Datasets:

SINAI

/

MCE-Corpus

like 0

Follow

Grupo de investigación en Sistemas Inteligentes de Acceso a la Información (SINAI) de la Universidad de Jaén 13

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/937

Txapulin

Borat

muchocine

At the height of the stupid Jackass.

I am one of those people that do not see fall who falls, not only by the downturn in quality have had since he left Wyoming, but because actually it happened wrong watching it; get me embarrassed attacks. Is it that Borat did not call me no entry. The idea of a man posing as a reporter for Kazakhstan touring United States with the idea of ridicule to his country and the visited country it was difficult to make me grace. You have some time curious, as the confusion of a turtle with a dog, and other revealing moments in certain ways of thinking American, as the statements of the cowboy in the rodeo against homosexuals, or sellers of weapons and cars or inmuten when Borat tells them that he wants them to kill Jews, anything to sell.But apart from that I would not want because if the movie were really a documentary made with hidden camera, imagine a camera shooting certain sequences reveal that all, or nearly all, is a complete farce. I am convinced that Pamela Anderson knows perfectly what her role in the film before the time of the autograph and that everything is prepared, like the Jewish assumptions that rent them a room. We will, it is a movie that I do not think anything and which is the alutura of the stupid Jackass.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2126

Alvaro Oliva

El retorno de los malditos

muchocine

The make-up and prostheses are the only thing that can save this movie, where everything is fairly simple, repetitive and unoriginal. Or the genre fans will be able to spend an afternoon entertaining with this return of the damned.

After the interesting remake of "the hills have eyes", directed by Alexander Aja, we have "The return of the damned", sequel that adds nothing and to take a step back in the genre again.The best without a doubt, is the teaser. Easy, simple and 100% effective, which while a southern music, the camera is supported in the desert. Then it passes one of the damned by dragging one of its victims, then see as another of the murderous strip one of the chains of the soil, and the camera is twisted, realizing that it is a subjective of the other victim.Therefore, which is why I understand that they have managed to "trick" to someone, as the script is quite unfortunate, as well as the start-up scene and other elements. Almost everything that the first part was virtues, Martin Weisz throws him down, with a simple story with some tasteless protagonists, in which ever you find affinity or empathy with monsters that leave a lot to be desired, and a film which is unsupported by any side.Not everything is the fault of the director. Wes Craven and his son Jonathan, are responsible for signing this "script", in which a group of military come to the mountains to deliver material to scientists and colleagues of the army, but upon arrival, are only uninhabited base. The cast is quite unknown, embodying some soldiers are not just very professional and expert, and who will have to manage them if they want to survive. The first flaw is that to be armed and be military, the public does not feel close to them, nor is put in its place. Just in case this was the case, we are presented with a range of characters that represent different aspects of society, including the anti-war soldier, mother, pretty girl, the Hispanic, African-American Sergeant, generous etc. In short, a sad campus, which was not thinking too much to the Craven in creating them. The make-up and prostheses are the only thing that can save this movie, where everything is fairly simple, repetitive and unoriginal. Or the genre fans will be able to spend an afternoon entertaining with this return of the damned.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/920

Cp

Déjà Vu

muchocine

The writer does not maintain a consistency in no time, the scenes are happening as you crave the Director, with the only justification that remain well, regardless of history.

Several days ago we had already gone to see Soraya and I, but not even I had motivated enough to write something about it. By that look so pessimistic, so that the film is a disappointment. Not at the level of director, the technical team or actors. In all such cases, is what you can expect anyone who has seen other films of Tony Scott and Denzel Washington. They work as normally do with their level of quality and the way they act or address to which we are accustomed. So that is a quite flexible film with action with Denzel doing his role as good (is the wrong, for other stories) and struggling to save the girl. Highlights are the performance of Val Kilmer, who is improving with age, the scene of the explosion (which we have already seen in the trailer), and how to shoot Scott. But all this is nothing, if everything build you on a defective basis. A time travel movie, camouflaged thriller, you need a solid script, without too many errors, or at least that go by connecting all the stories, the motivations of the characters and their actions of end fitting at the end. This is not the case. Seems the only writer thought to do a story of travel in time, where at the end the protagonist saves the girl, and if we have to do crap about it, including spoil all the previous history, because it is done and now this, what matters is that the film ends well. I am not going to get into the amount of crap on the theories of time travel, eye, not about the known science, but to the theories which have own tape. That is the problem, the writer, or the writing staff do not maintain a consistency in no time, scenes are happening as you crave the Director, with the only justification that remain well, regardless of history. A disaster, will. See Deja Vu I understand why so many millions of dollars are paid by a good script, increasingly more scarce.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1008

Silvia

Nueve vidas

muchocine

Perhaps not reach masterpiece owing to greater cohesion between the stories, but the advantage that the movie is that it makes sense that we we have a promising director when it comes to dive into the most intimate emotions of each.

Any person has a story to tell. In this film are nine stories: nine lives. In each episode, the finale is as an impact in the stomach, hit the conscience and leaves reflecting the Viewer. It is the narration, filmed in a single sequence of nine stories, nine fragments of life of nine women of ages, conditions and different personalities, but are essentially the same. Each one is a different situation, but that becomes its own emotional crossroads.Scraps of life of fifteen minutes each that make up a universal portrait of the female essence. A dive so deep in the woman's personality not could have got better that, as in this case, with close-ups that bring us closer to the characters, with a camera that accompanies and follows their movements and convert to the viewer at first-hand testimony of what is happening there. Sandra is an immigrant who spends his days locked up in prison and lives with the impotence of mired to embrace his little daughter. Diana (Robin Wright Penn), a pregnant woman who sees how his emotional stability stumbles to find with a past love. In the emotional reunion in the supermarket scene, affection seems to be reborn again between the couple, moreover, it is a feeling that not never left. Another parts shows the State of anxiety that suffers from a woman on the brink of a surgical operation, intense moment even manages to snatch a nervous smile to the Viewer. Love, pain, sex, death and loneliness, mingle in these stories being the expression of life itself. Although the set of stories is somewhat irregular, by the fact that some stories samples more developed than others, manages to keep up without just decay into the tape.With a mise en scene apparently sober but impeccable and a soft soundtrack like a caress, the director of things that say just by looking at her and son of writer Gabriel García Marquez once again as a wise connoisseur of feminine psychology confirms that has a special sensitivity to translate into images the human feeling. Perhaps not reach masterpiece owing to greater cohesion between the stories, but the advantage that the movie is that it makes sense that we we have a promising director when it comes to dive into the most intimate emotions of each.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2708

Iñaki Bilbao

Locos por el surf

muchocine

It is not, at all, masterpiece that some are saying there, but it is good, excellent in some moments, sparkling in much of the footage, and enjoyable throughout.

Funny comedy cartoons, with the world of the surf as the main theme.In it, in this amazing and competitive world, all kinds of characters, is: the Super champion, here stuffing of vanity, the young man who dreams of emulating his late Idol, the inseparable friend, a sparkling Brazilian chicken, the girl fell in love with. All pretty convencional.al least in story to the profile of the characters.That makes it very different from the rest of movies with dibus, is the technique employed to narrate the story. A technique which combines wisely the camera in hand, the flash-back, file images, filming type "Survivors on the island", and the wonderful shots in the water with these superb pranks made by surfers in its grandiose and powerful waves.The film is at all times very entertaining, if somewhat uneven in its pace.The beginning is very good and serves to masterfully portraying various characters, using a wonderful music to emphasize her. Later, and until the character of Geek appears in action, interest is growing and enjoys really.However, with the emergence of Geek, the tape becomes nostalgic and with a point of sentimentality that does not bother, but yes lastra vivid pace hitherto prevailed. Even the humor becomes somewhat and becomes a child (the peculiar tribe of cannibals), undoubtedly to meet (seems to me nda bad) to younger viewers. However, there are great moments, as when Geek attempts to teach Rocky a good surf board manufacturing process, how should be sanded wood. "A moment of rare intensity, carried out with great tenderness, passion and love for the job well done by oneself.""Crazy for the surf" is not, at all, the masterpiece that some are saying out there, but really it is good, excellent in some moments, sparkling in much of the footage, and enjoyable throughout.An animated film advisable for entertainment for the entire family.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3757

JLO

Cerdos salvajes

muchocine

Incredible by you where look. Not for the surprise of their unexpected achievements, but because it is impossible that a script so poor and with ideas for the comedy behind decades will filming.

Incredible movie where you look. Not for the surprise of their unexpected achievements, but because it is impossible that a script so poor and with ideas for the comedy behind decades will filming. And no doubt that the fact that it is realizable is because actors of the stature of John Travolta, Tim Allen, Martin Lawrence and exquisite secondary William H. Macy decided to make it.If we talk only about Travolta is worse, already a case apart. An actor who seems determined to accept everything that will pass nearby, roundly. More skinny, fat, fat again, that they seem to be interpretative variants. Choose a film well and three evil. Tarantino will be repentant of his revival? An artistic agent here!.Four fifties friends decide to leave their daily routines and venturing into bike by the roads Yankees to see it what them the destiny. His argument that is simplistically. But there is another way to exemplify it either.In this "film" education is not that one in the beginning of old age may their dreams despite the look escrutadora from the outside, if not that everything can be resolved. shock. And still losing fights. Do incredible mentioned above?.The salvageable are these amazing custom motorcycles, these beauties are the dream of anyone who ever has gone on two wheels. The true protagonists of the film. Some side well resolved, good gags (Marisa Tomei, Ray Liotta), the sympathy of the leading, good end crèditos, isn't enough to take off from mediocrity.The only salvageable joke is that the friend of actor Tim Allen (voice of the unforgettable Buzz Lighthyear) is called. Woody. Film that if oneself is not humor, is to launch to infinity and beyond.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2493

José A. Peig

Harry poter y el caliz de fuego

muchocine

The main setback in the style and the identity of the work is the mediocre display of director Mike Newell, superfluous and repetitive. Their close-ups and your lousy sense of rhythm (in fact, lacks visual rhythm) difficult to distinguish between his film and any Disney movie.

Goblet of fire is a story of conspiracy in which Harry Potter is the wizard of straw and the key piece for the achievement of a goal: the rebirth of Voldemort. The history displays various subhistorias, alternating sequences between a competition of magicians and the first conflicts in love and friendship. Whereas the saga as a whole, this gives confirms the evolution of the universe harrypotteriano from child towards the pre-adolescent. The characters grow, Hogwarts grows and becomes witness to progress towards adulthood, analogous to a few events that follow a pattern of drama "in crescendo" in space. We believe that the attribute more representative and remarkable of the saga is that progression of tones, from early childhood until puberty problematic. Seems its walls that enclose the landscape, the symbolism and the architecture of Hogwarts, the mysteries and events and surrounding valleys, is a reflection or metaphor of the insecurities, fears and hormonal changes in their human protagonists. It may not be very risky to say that, in future, the saga of Harry Potter will be interpreted as if it were a metaphor, in soap opera kistch key, on the passage of time and changes in the future.However, the fourth film returns to fall into the errors of the first. The structure is quite right, as we have said, underlies the central motif (conspiracy to resurrect Voldemort) of which the various sub-plots are constituent parts of it. What fails is the articulation of the various plots. Goblet of fire is a scattered and vague film because of the absence of some connectors to create a dramatic sense of set. In the course of minutes work disjointed pieces: Harry nightmares and his disagreements with his friend Ron, the flirtations of teenage love, competitions and tests to overcome, the conflict between teachers and other tics of the saga. Writer, in this case, wanted to develop too much information and in the end fails to the necessary cohesion between the pieces. And, specifically, do not get any of them to be interesting, except for the last twenty minutes, in a total of one hundred and fifty. How much untapped footage. The main setback in the style and the identity of the work is the mediocre display of director Mike Newell, superfluous and repetitive. Their close-ups and your lousy sense of rhythm (in fact, lacks visual rhythm) difficult to distinguish between his film and any Disney movie. And where deficiencies are most noticeable in the scene Summit - or which should have been scene Summit-, the return of Voldemort. On the one hand, confirm that Voldemort is a bad little chicha, and decaffeinated clear that little juice can be drawn with a very mediocre performance. It is a problem of mise en scene, first and foremost. In summary, very loose this fourth part of the adventures of the young Wizard, conspicuous only by sporadic anecdotes and moments. That Yes, the sinister end opens many unknowns that promise great emotions for the next adventure. We will be vigilant.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2145

Rafa Delgado

Descubriendo a los Robinsons

muchocine

A breath of fresh air in the meantime green ogre, easy joke computer generated, and so much sequel unnecessary Disney direct to DVD market.

Since a few years ago, Disney does not lift head. Their latest products non-Pixar, as 'Wild' or 'Chicken Little', left much to be desired, in addition to not create any expectation, as did their traditional animated films during their golden ages.Among so much frustration and so many unnecessary sequels direct to DVD market, little, little good product there has been ("Lilo and Stitch").The incorporation of Pixar Animation Studios to the factory of dreams of the tito Walt was the salvation of this, and the first result of this Union has been 'Discovering the Robinsons', which is not a Pixar film, but that it has teamed up with very grateful of Dios John Lasseter (creator of 'Toy Story') as an executive producer.Something that has been noticed much in the final result.I had no expectation with this film. Call me not care at all, in addition to beginning to loathe the kind of movies animated entirely by computer (which began with 'Shrek') which are detestably overblown and that contain only fools jokes and absurd, repetitive situations to "fail well".But, fortunately, in this case I was wrong, and I I have brought a very pleasant and unexpected surprise (and, who want to deceive, a breath of fresh air bienvenidísimo).'Discovering the Robinsons' can be many things: being too crazy at times (especially during the half, where he'll literally by the hills of Ubeda. see the episode of the Tyrannosaurus, passage that only serves to make children laugh), have some - few - gags do not pinch of grace, of some small up loose ends in the plot, and if even parochial (to what is the reference to Raphael?). However, all the above is clouded by its admirable and intelligent script (despite the small lagoons, perdonables to be a child title), for the fun and entertaining that comes to be, and to recover during the magnificent final minutes the best and most nostalgic spirit Disney (with the characteristic style of John Lasseter, who despite being an executive producer)(note his hand that has gone into the project).Technically it is not big deal. Okay, but it adds nothing new. or lack that makes you. The soundtrack, a delight.It's a great time, very well done and very enjoyable travel adventure: these plot twists in a certain point completely changes the impression which is given during the first half of the film. 100% recommended for the whole family, although the kids can that they Lien with so much (well, not many) temporary pradoja.Since then, Disney has given a great - and very grateful - step from the arduousness of 'Chicken Little'.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2410

Tito Chinchan

Transmorphers

muchocine

Tremendous Truñaco of a director need of resources and ingenuity, has decided to pull the pull of the original to sneak us this. Only recommend seeing "made" special effects, which are to die of laughter.

It was so quiet at home when my friend Benito Trujillo tells me that he has of the Transformers on DVD, that Yes, with subtitles. Very soon seemed to me, still not been released worldwide, but my friend Beni almost never lies. So I I quickly started to see her. Bad begins when I see that they destroy the Earth's atmosphere, and worse when I get the first shot of beam laser, painted with tempera on frame. Bad, bad.The film is an apocalyptic future, where after having contacted the aliens, they annihilated us (like hariamos us, nothing new). After 300 years hidden in the bowels of the Earth, humanity is ready to retake the planet, which is why out of the freezer to a type (round and round microwave). And that will, as you not have the end, just over me has been recorded.This film reminded me a friend who said "I sack me and if suck me it, because what I have won". Time ago I see no peculiar character. These smart people have brought to the shadow of Transformers, this truño of colossal dimensions. If some unsuspecting pica and she swallows it folded as a server. The argument no feet or head, special effects for die and the protagonists lironda monda. As a point, two curious things. On the one hand, that the protagonists are lesbians (nothing of lesbian sex, my readers pajilleros). And the other that when they shoot the shots with a Bic pen are painted (this had already said, but it is deadly and truthful).To sum up, tremendous truñaco of a director lacking resources and ingenuity, has decided to pull the pull of the original to sneak us this. Only recommend seeing "made" special effects, which are to die of laughter.What I could laugh with the worldly effects.Besitos.P.D: The final should be a tribute to Blade Runner, but as if I say that my balls are a homage to the monster of cookies (by the hairy, that everything must explain it).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2784

Natalia Eseverri

El ultimátum de Bourne

muchocine

Go see the Bourne últimatum, if it is that you like to enjoy a movie of action with constant tension, a good script and phrases of these sentenciadoras that leave you stone.

Lately I do more than complain about my boss. I did not know this facet jefera which is must always criticizing the employee for the minimum fault committed, more than anything to emphasize the degree of superiority which are before us. If that makes them happy, beyond them.The fact is that this aspect is hindering you enjoy my great radio moment and see that my dream slowly (even though my patience not hold it) will meet. Once I heard that careful what you wish, and do not so agree. In reality, it is more careful with what you dream because then when you look, what you want does not have the result that one expects.Am not going to let this woman do to go with bad side in the morning and not only by me, but by the people that every morning even if it is a little plug radio so I encourage them their cleaning, their work or that it simply entertains him and make them forget their problems a little while.I love to enjoy each step I do nothing else enter the study, when I go to organize my tiny desk with all the roles I have to announce (lost cats, blood donations, exhibition of reptiles urghh), then I'm thinking that songs are appropriate to start each block and that I want to hear, between means I have to put some obligation because people have to listen to everything and not only what to my I like.And so, one day and another, and the thing is that each time I costs less I get to go to work, I replaced by I wake up to have some fun with my radio.And please, go see the Bourne últimatum, if it is that you like to enjoy a movie of action with constant tension, a good script and phrases of these sentenciadoras that leave you stone. And I hope that many directors will account which not many punch Gets a better result for an action film. Mr Damon, this has been one of the best roles for refianzar his career, believe me.Now, women should look at your partner and seek that Bourne every man has inside, when you find it, enjoy it and make it appear more often.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3270

Naty Buqué

Rapado

muchocine

A small, almost amateur film but with a very strong itself, intelligent consciousness and, if it is too simple, is interesting as a preamble to what Rejtman did brilliantly then, with 'Silvia Prieto' and 'The magical gloves'.

Shaved, the first feature film of the Argentine Martín Rejtman, based on a self-titled story of his namesake book, is largely the genesis of his style unique, intelligent and extremely interesting, but quite amateur version without the humor that would mark his following films.The feature perhaps Rejtman film main is the creation of a diegesis not realistic (but not so far from the realism), with a code of action itself, for framing small stories with empty characters (not merely empty: there is an emptying as a result of a social context that crumbling social relations). This, in turn, with a sense of humor excruciating, built with sadly funny characters and dialogs (sort of shared monologues, where we talk about but it is not heard) underpinning.The humor does not appear in shaved. The characters have nothing to say or do, but this is not resolved, in his later films, with the humor that this pathos generated by stupid dialogues and that do not allow communication between those who argue. The film is much more explicitly sad, although never assume the code of the drama.The plot of the film moves not by the characters but by objects ranging, worthless, hand in hand, by all of them. Obviously eloquent about the pathetic consumer society in decadence that was the Argentina of the 1990s (moving objects are a clock, stolen motorcycles, counterfeits, pieces of video games that function as money), the film also speaks of a lost generation - not in the sense that no longer but that is not a heading.With a very good photography and camera moves, framing some desolate environments (houses of families of class average goings unless, desolate Buenos Aires streets), the film is aesthetically simple but careful. The same happens with the plot.In short, a small, almost amateur film but with a very strong itself, intelligent consciousness and, if it is too simple, is interesting as a preamble to what Rejtman did brilliantly then, in the same vein, with Silvia Prieto and the magical gloves.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/243

Jose Contreras

Scary movie 4

muchocine

How can pull themselves together in a single film the arguments of the war of the worlds, Million dollar baby and Saw without that Miss the thread?

How can pull themselves together in a single film the arguments of the war of the worlds, Million dollar baby and Saw without that Miss the thread? It is unimportant, because the viewer sees Scary movie does not seek a coherent argument, but a flurry of allusions. Other films include: the curse, the forest, Brokeback mountain. And two moments of television: the interview of Tom Cruise, and the scene of Bush reading a story in a nursery while attacking the twin towers. And, by the way, there is an allusion to the blogs.David Zucker is a veteran of film parody. He made his debut with his brother Jerry Zucker (Ghost) and Jim Abrahams in "Lands as you can" and repeated the success with "Top Secret". Took over in the third installment of Scary Movie and it is already preparing the fifth. The first two films Scary movie, by the way, I've not seen, are of Keenen Ivory Wayans. The fourth installment is the first I see because my prejudices. And that reminds me that I have to rent the above, because it is not negligible.Many jokes of Scary movie are of coarse salt, or "caca-teta - ass-fart-pis" as calls Javier Ocaña. But they do fulfill their function, separate us from the emotional strain that the movie itself could create. It is not going to see movies, but of making fun of the film. And in the parodic vocation, there is plenty of deconstruction. Those same elements that made us suffer, or engage in the original dismounted before our eyes so we can laugh, just like an actor that will remove the bloody mask so we were there trick.Says Noel Carroll in his book "Philosophy of terror" or paradoxes of the heart that we see movies of fear to immunize us against what we are scared. More reason to watch films ridiculing the fear. It is also dismantle other typical effects of the film, as the mythologization. During a movie actors reach seem Ethereal, why Zucker makes that Carmen Electra in the role of the blind of the forest within the Assembly that confuses a bathroom and do your needs in front of everyone, or that the father scared of the war of the worlds take advantage of one of the thunderous lightning to throw a fart. It's dismantling our sympathies towards these vulnerable beings, such as the Dakota Fanning of the war of the worlds which here takes all the hits. We like that they mistreat her because we have spent two hours suffering with Spielberg that will not happen anything.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3647

Heitor Pan

Beowulf

muchocine

Hopefully that Zemeckis completed his technical experimentation and then again we spend good time. Do for the moment, what we get clear with?Beowulf? is that Miss Jolie is still best of cartoon that in flesh and blood? already it is to say.

Robert Zemeckis is getting into a spiral of formal Précieuses absent of content is starting to become tiresome. I hope it is just the beginning of a stage, the results of experimentation that lead the director to put all his efforts in the technical part forgetting the fundamental part of a film, the story and I also hope it will solved over time.Something similar happened with the first games in which the desire to create something new gave extremely simple products. So just have to remember the first video game in history, consisting of a pair of bars that move vertically and a square ball. Although now that I think, what was of most addictive.Does not pass the same with the new film based on the technical "Performance capture", than in román paladino comes still record real actors, to then digitally capture your images and create a virtual character. Without any doubt, this mode of animation plus you can see in 3D in some rooms, is best of the film. Everything else, smells to mediocre.Zemeckis technique improves by leaps and bounds. What were simple drawings that resembled faces known here in "Polar express" happens to a new level. Expressions of the actors are very successful and all of them are easily unidentifiable. Ray Winstone, Angelina Jolie, Anthony Hopkins, Robin Wright-Penn and John Malkovich are converted into characters of legend, the Visual details are taken care of to the maximum and images in 3D rallan perfection. All this enables spectacular battles, impossible characters and epic scenarios, but everything blurs by the non-existent rhythm of the film.The story, taken from the most famous Anglo-Saxon epic poem, narrates the adventures of King Beowulf, obsessed hero by going down in history for his exploits and that's it. A battle at the beginning, another cortita in the middle and one at the end and the rest are dialogues without depth and pure and hard filled. Nothing makes us draw attention to the adventures of the characters except for the curiosity to see Angelina Jolie in 3D virtual tits.Make an epic movie is not to include a couple of mythological characters or legend, a few well choreographed fights and a hero grips and tormented. A minimum of history must be spinning parts of action if we want to achieve that the viewer he cares what the hero live or die. It may be the English poem which does not give for more, but still, a good writer should know separate the wheat from the chaff and fill, creatively, parties in white. If something has served me "Beowulf" is for realize me how good that I found the trilogy of "The Lord of the rings" or "300".Hopefully Mr Zemeckis completed his technical experimentation and again make us spend the good times of films like "Who framed Roger Rabbit?", "Forrest Gump" or "Back to the future" trilogy. For the moment, what we get clear with "Beowulf" is Miss Jolie even better cartoon that in flesh and blood which is already say.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4231

Oscar Martínez

Ahora o nunca

muchocine

Only notable performances by Nicholson and Freeman manage to save 'Now or never' from the boredom and the fussiness, in a sympathetic but relamida film.

This weekend comes to our bulletin boards, The bucket list, as always, faithfully translated by these lares as now or never.Directed by Rob Reiner and starring these two already Jurassic monsters of interpretation that are Jack Nicholson and Morgan Freeman alongside Sean Hayes, Rob Morrow, Beverly Todd, Alfonso Freeman, Rowena King, Serena Reeder and Hugh B. Holub, the film tells the story of two terminally ill patients, one of humble family and another billionaire, who decide to make a list with his last wishes a reality.Certainly, the golden years of the filmmaker Rob Reiner were anchored between the late 1980s and early 1990s, when between 1986 and 1992 lead titles account with me, the Princess Bride, when Harry met Sally, Misery and some good men. Since then, his career has been chopped, and the truth is that only these two actors with capital letters that are Jack Nicholson and Morgan Freeman fail to save his last film of the burning.Conceived as a drama with background of comedy (or vice versa), now or never works solely and exclusively by the good work of its two protagonists, able to get oil of an obvious script and some situations or joke or forcibly tear gas. And if now or never was starring two other actors, no doubt would be speaking a ñoña, simplistic, cheesy and quite vulgar movie in general terms.With a first third of footage in which now or never puts us in situation and in which we can enjoy of certain bis conatuses dramatic, turn to a thick film that is limited to a succession of totally predictable but not by them less funny gags and a sort of documentary of the wonders of the world, while the two protagonists are each roles already usual for all: Nicholson, the rogue ricachón and selfish, and Freeman, humble and full, besides being, how no, the voice of the Narrator.And, as you expect, you will learn each other. That's all.Luckily, the script passes to feet letter by the theological message, without claiming lecturing us (at least, not in excess), but does not escape the situations of easy tear. On the other hand, it should be insisting that the good work of its protagonists to now or never becomes a film pleasant view, entertaining and exceptional locations, managing to convey to the viewer the latent buenrollismo over your footage.On the other hand, one cannot complain that the Union of these two great actors has not produced a higher quality product and that, with a minimally original screenplay, the movie had given a lot more than itself.Entertaining movie to pass the time.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3670

Natalia Eseverri

Mr Brooks

muchocine

And if all dejaramos out that being of evil that supposedly cohabits with us? Remember it well.

We continuos with a new film that explores that malignant internal side of the supposed that we possess all humans. If in the strange that there is in me, explored the ability of a person harm, by avenge the loss of a loved one, this time the motivation is quite different, since Mr. Brooks acts killing other people for an addiction. But I rather think that it is a mere excuse to flee her boring and lonely life and become someone who can control their own destiny and that of others.Both Kevin Costner interpretations, who believe that it is one of the best roles of his career, because it shows to perfection as though you want to resist killing, you cannot avoid to do it again and that is transparent in their eyes and in their gestures, like the of William Hurt, who makes an alter ego to perfection and can play with the feelings and emotions of Mr Brooks as if handled a game of chess.What most impresses you is that you get for a moment to understand the motivations that lead to that person to do such things, and therefore it is also important to the character that you are excited to see and done a crime with it, because somehow you also te pica the curiosity, the anxiety that we know everything.The only downside is that some scenes are excessively long and makes you heavy history, but it's good a momentary thing.It is not that I have forgotten that Demi Moore is also, but it is that the duo protagonist the supersedes both on screen, that did me not need nor that appear.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1653

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Bosque de sombras

muchocine

What could have been and was not: a failed, although worthy, example film ruined by a dash vulgar, devoid of any claim.

It could be another movie of visitors stuck in a spiral of violence in a hostile atmosphere full of locals wicked, but is in other rural thriller coined by all the conventions of the genre. Smells like Sam Peckinpah (straw dogs) and also gives whiff John Boorman (Deliverance), although there is no blatant plagiarism and is all in evidence shows respect and tribute to these two masters of cinema, but Bosque de sombras (The backwoods) lastra a script of an amazing precarious taking into consideration almost craftsmanship of a director (Koldo Serra) who spoils his work and it is of a quality without saying: shines photography, acting appearance and a sort of location for foreign that we didn't have news in the recent national cinema.The argument we punished a slow exacerbates: is not an appetizing delinquencies on which rest some Wicker of the script. We all have certain of the direction on which to tack the fabric. Partly because we have seen straw dogs, or perhaps because the work of writing has not been so to the height as everything else. Or an absolutely great Gary Oldman (who wins integers in this little in his career, but in his filmography of quality role) get that we can get more involved in the film. Well-stocked to use clichés that populate the genre, Bosque de sombras no cares in retouch them, lead them to their land. Stylistic patterns are filmed with superb style: is one very pleasantly impressed by the light (there are scenes that are attached to the memory after seeing the movie), but desastra the whole with a noise that encorajina us because we would like to (is my case) that the tape contained other merits to get fully where points: towards a round film in a rookieyou look at what most difficult subject. Jorge Sánchez-Cabezudo succeeds in its exquisite the night of the sunflowers, already criticized on these pages.This rugged and dry portrait on violence and incommunicado detention ends up Suomi their undeniable successes with an also rugged and dry finish where we do not know more and (jobs to be fascinated by the plot) rather than it would like. This lack of information does not help that the review is more golosa in beautiful adjectives and joining this unfortunate inventory of great films (without hypocrisy) (some almost masterpieces) die from any reviewed bleeding, a bug in the screws which means that the building come down just at the moment that we were more enjoying his climbing. To highlight the presence of Lluis Homar in State of grace in the role of vengeful garrulo surrounded by morons garrulos. The three films that I know (La mala educación, Los Borgia and it) show a huge job and a future (and already has the man his years) to consider.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/777

Dragon negro

Saw 3

muchocine

It accuses the lack of surprise. Well thought out and successful, although the final surprise is rather weak in comparison with the previous installments.

New installment of the serial killer known as Puzzle that follows where we stayed in the second part. Puzzle is bedridden in a dying bed and his assistant which is responsible for preparing the tests whose first victims will be among others the police that in part II pursued the murderer. Puzzle hours are few, but still have time for a last game while it kidnapped a doctor to keep it alive during this.The third part of Saw accused the lack of surprise and impress the Viewer, that tests are nothing more than the same has already seen with slight modifications and some failures of imagination this time. The film runs between two lines argued them, the man caught and faced various tests, and the murderer about to die in bed and the care that carry you out the doctor, under threat of death clear. Thus this second line is the most interesting and which arouses more curiosity to know if Puzzle will survive or not.Large doses of blood and violence back to be present and are already the House brand, but I said, that already they do not impress both and have lost this capacity surprise and cause the bad feeling that they gave in the first and second part of which still hurts if I remember the hole full of syringes. All the pieces of the film just fitting in a puzzle, the murderer does not leave any loose, nothing is the result of random, it is all part of a grand master plan that has just developed as he laid down. As such the film is well intended and achieved, although the final surprise is rather weak in comparison with the previous installments. But, in spite of its many flaws, the film entertains and appeal to all who enjoyed other deliveries. In addition, his great collection at the box office has assured a fourth installment in the face of next year, we Saw for a while.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4037

Andrés Pons

La Serpiente y el Arcoiris

muchocine

Why the snake and the arco iris is a rare bird in the trajectory of the author decanting a much more mature script, a more developed staging, notable means that help in the Visual scalping to offer a beautiful dish on their picture with elegance in all technical aspects where beautiful landscapes are one trump card in all the elegance that is breathed from the foreground.

A strange title especially if takes into account of who signed and at the time that took place. Again I repeat strange being of WES CRAVEN that despite being one of the key names in the genre, his filmography adorns not serious titles with a terror developed particularly in the more youthful area where its greatest merits is restricted.Nightmare on ELM STREET was its greater recognition as well as provide a key character in the scene of horror with the figure of FREDDY KRUEGER, played by ROBERT ENGLUND. The SCREAM saga gave again boost his career especially in the face of the box office not quite critically.Low-quality titles bloating his work as for example the basement of fear, deadly friend, 100,000 volts of horror etc.In its early days it surprises with works of extreme violence in the last House on the left or the hills have ojos.¿Pero all these titles have in common? I think that its brutal beginnings it took party for the exploitation of the time with films troop a good degree of torture, revenge, violations and of course GORE along with sex, in the other group comes to the edible merchantability for adolescents. Everything always focused on easy grossing exploitation.Why the snake and the arco iris is a rare bird in the trajectory of the author decanting a much more mature script, a more developed staging, notable means that help in the Visual scalping to offer a beautiful dish on their picture with elegance in all technical aspects where beautiful landscapes are one trump card in all the elegance that is breathed from the foreground.If it were little CRAVEN risks in the 1980s where the ZOMBIE Cannibal raged in all productions of series b changing the optics to delve into the VOODO being of form is the subgenre to its beginnings of for example I walked with a ZOMBIE. The always excellent BILL PULLMAN leads the cast with his usual charisma in one of her first roles, time then jump to stardom in participations of success as INDEPENDENCE DAY or as dormías.A horror film brilliant well above the average of its author that maybe flojee a little credible final act.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2080

JLO

Reservoir dogs

muchocine

From his opera prima Tarantino you can like it or not, but you never will leave indifferent. In Reservoir Dogs clearly already marked his particular and personal style that later made him famous.

The irruption of Quentin Tarantino film was a breath of fresh air as a slap to the anesthetized mainstream cinema. From his first film you may like or not, but you never will leave indifferent. In Reservoir Dogs clearly already marked his particular and personal style that later made him famous. A film that begins with the phrase: "Like a virgin is about a girl that he met a guy with a big cock"? It is a serious thing. The robberies or the so-called "homages" not distract the narration, but derived in new situations, in the known hyper anecdote of their passage by the video club, but unlike that steals for stealing, they enrich their film to the point of to his ceaseless parade of taste class B (Madonna, Japanese gangsters films, music and 70's series)not bother us and on the contrary, we are charming tastes.The breakdown of time which would later make famous Pulp Fiction is already present with the plus that is about a robbery that never looks (noblesse oblige: this was already in the great The Killing of Stanley Kubrick). Quentin takes forward its stories through banal dialogues become irresistible, crossed by a rare freedom? as the total absence of women - and with much wave by her seduction constant even in insignificant details, as these black suits parodied and appropriate style. But the base which supports Reservoir Dogs and the own Quentin - is in cash and his tremendous mounting. Assembly which shines the same way here that in Pulp Fiction and even, in the two parts of Kill Bill failed. Do as an example, the sequence of the false story of Tim Roth, far the best role for his fetish of this first stage actor, who then call for the Four Room episode is also which opens and closes Pulp Fiction.Los frenetic flashbacks never? or few times - were better used both by your information agility that gives the story tale. Reservoir Dogs is their vision of how should re - make movies so often seen in the beloved video club as a teenager. Not to mention its soundtrack, today already a classic total. His subsequent to Pulp Fiction film is as irregular as any child of neighbour. Rumors of their future projects do not show any improvement. To enjoy this new classic, re-read that review seemed so pleasant as the first time. Equally and with what has been already done, Quentin belongs forever to the Pantheon of the elect.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2398

José A. Peig

Cartas desde Iwo Jima

muchocine

The main flaw of the film lies in its scheme, too discursive and repetitive, raised as a brilliant representation of Japan on the beaches of Iwo Jima, but superfluous drama to the end and all, always comes back on them? tics? without developing a story that can be deployed its complexities.

"The need to identify with a flag, with an army representative and defender of the ideals system of life, to reaffirm with a uniform and democracy acts by a group of boys who, much to his regret, makes them prisoners of this network of myths and symbols." "Victims, nothing less, the screeching, despair, manipulation and the hypocrisy of society which lost to his friends on the battlefield, what really cared."These words define part of the spirit of "Flags of our fathers" - and that already published in his day - first installment of the diptych on the war and their meanings, and it complemented with letters from Iwo Jima, a free and personal project of this prodigious called filmmaker Clint Eastwood, could say overly ambitious by claim to be something like this as the final "testament" on the second world war, and on the tragedy of the war itself, by deploying two positions and perspectives: American culture as opposed to the Japanese culture. We talk about two military cultures, with peculiar characteristics each of them patriotic values and the duty of the soldier.The contrast between the two cultures finds its best expression in different attitudes and values: for Americans - go the text to opens the comment-, still being victims of the myths of the war premium first and foremost individualism, friendship and family. The country is the monster that are revered. A tribute of bitter taste, seen through the eyes of Eastwood. Instead, for the Japanese soldiers, the collectivity and the motherland are above any other consideration. My personal beliefs are the beliefs of my country, said at one point the character more representative of the film, in a scene which the Japanese military facing the American aristocracy. We come to mean by this that the diptych of the battle on Iwo Jima contains - among other things of equal or greater calibre - a speech about two cultures, two communities that are organized and face the war holding values and divergent reasons.However, the common factor is predominant ultimately: others suffer the same fear to not return to meet with loved ones, death, loneliness, the raw violence. Eastwood dissects and "naked" to the military of both factions to leave the common to all humanity to become authentic protagonist of the war story. Beyond of divergent cultures, humanity converges in a same pain and same expectations. Thus we believe that they will be valued in the future these two films that have so little enthusiasm aroused to day, without ceasing to be a valuable document on various topics of enormous significance for our time.Little more needs to be said: Eastwood is limited to exhibit - without further or develop with too much, it must be said - the values of the hierarchy in the Japanese military code, the sacrifice and the cold discipline of the kamikazes. The approach to the main characters this free all Manichaeism, and although one can speak of absence of topics - because any, and in addition we seem quite inevitable-, is an intimate approach without sensibleros excesses. Everything is stark reality and strong sample of unavoidable psychological and physical tension inherent in war, supported by superb performances, actually the actors are splendid in their respective roles.Apart from the possible topics, the main flaw of the film lies in its scheme, too discursive and repetitive, raised as a brilliant representation of the drama ran up on the beaches of Iwo Jima, but superfluous to the end and all, always comes back on the same "tics" without developing a story that can be deployed its complexities. That is, it is a narrative too schematic, a mere exhibition without any dynamism, and this is what makes slightly less than "Flags of our fathers", as it introduces the analysis towards a revelation of bitter self-criticism in a circular progression that leads to the reason that justifies all the footage.Here we have a product more "stretched", to lead the buried cards to hide the feelings, the vulnerability incompatible with iron discipline that only pursues a collective goal, to the detriment of the love to the friend, the family, the beloved wife. That underground in the form of hidden letters beneath the Earth, humanity contrasts - but converges - with military uniforms lying on the sand, as we see in the recent levels of "Flags of our fathers". In one case and in the other, what emerges and reveals is the vulnerability and feeling human in the midst of the battle.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/260

Hombre Lobo

Las colinas tienen ojos

muchocine

Absolutely unmissable film with images which must have done to the American censors falling from the Chair

The hills have eyes (2006) was defined by Richard Roeper (the second most popular film of United States critic) as "an ugly piece of splatter-porn". It is the kind of movie in which your girlfriend leaves you, the type of tape to which people refer when it leaves the multiplex, furious, saying "but if I come to the cinema to have a good time". If this does not convince you to go to see her, I don't know that it can work, because without doubt are dealing with the terror of the year piece. The Gaul Alexandre Aja has not only understood perfectly what makes great original Wes Craven film that brings this concept to the absolute limits.At the beginning, Aja displays the history making almost a copy of the original Craven, following exactly the same storyline of a family who suffers from an "accident" in the hills again Mexico is attacked by a horde of mutant cannibals. Differences between the subtle (apart from the geographical location and the fact that the accident is caused on this occasion) is the greater emphasis on this occasion in the origin of mutants: the harmful effects of the product of decades of atomic test radiation. However, the similarities just in the moment in which the Carter family is finally his deformed pursuers dam. The brutal attack is shown by Aja in splendor, without reserve or a detail, and abuse suffered by women Carter at the hands of their attackers is, in my opinion, very difficult to endure, especially an image in particular that must have made American censors falling from the Chair. These details are not free, only showing us the savagery of the mutants (which on this occasion, thanks to the unique work of Greg Nicotero and Howard Berger, seem to actually mutants, special mention for the new and spectacular Pluto, and forgive me Michael Berryman) may Aja show what is undoubtedly the essential point: the reaction of the protagonist family. After all (and here is where it shows the effectiveness of this remake) really horrible movie is not the suffering of those who die, but what happens to those who survive, the bestiality that arises in those seemingly timid beings who must choose between death and become authentic inhuman monsters. AJA twists and expresses this idea in the figure of the timid Democratic that everyone mocked and ending converted in a beast covered with blood and thirsty for revenge, whose actions are to make matters worse accompanied with an epic music that makes one, as public, do not know if the director is doing a chant or a critique of bestiality. It's funny, in addition, be garnish this with a somewhat jingoistic profile (the American flag becomes here a cynical instrument of destruction). You can make this a trip of my pot, but now that I know that the father of Alexandre Aja is a notable politician of French socialism, I'm not so sure.Another huge success of this remake is what refers to their antagonists. The new mutants in the hills have eyes, apart from its repulsive ugliness, are real animals who have been deprived almost entirely of dialogue (something which in my opinion due to the original). In addition, their numbers already not confined only to a family clan (though Billy Drago makes a great Jupiter in a brief cameo) but that its history extends to mythological levels in what for me is the best sequence of the film: a visit to a ghost town inhabited by the race of cannibals and their offspring. This, coupled with agoraphobia that produces this immense and hot desert of which there is no possible exit, and that tremendous final table of survivors, makes this an absolutely unmissable film. And I wonder: what Alexandre Aja can do in the future? Whatever it is, it will have to see it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3398

Jesus Lens

Las 13 Rosas

muchocine

Brings together the compendium of vices and misery that have become our homeland cinematography best repellent for the Viewer: Manichean, boring, poor and is incredibly poorly written, performed worse and worse directed.

Dear Bomarzo: Do you know when finished to note that "The thirteen roses" is bad guts?Then at the end, when the platoon fired on the girls, and relieved, I thought for my himself that goodness, that it was time that was hungry and, finally, a rich ham and melted cheese sandwich could eat me. It's like the of the "Jeanne d'Arc" of Luc Besson, when they finally beat him fire the Jovovich, I applauded to break my hands.Sorry to begin this letter with what might seem a boutade without grace or, even worse, a lack of respect for the memory of those thirteen girls, vilely assassinated by the Francoist Government at the end of the Civil War. But it is not. Contempt for his report, in any case, is given by a painful and shameful film, whose viewing causes embarrassment.It goes without saying that seems special to our cinema to continue diving in important events in our history, as do the cinemas around the world. And I don't care to continue the same Civil war movies that Americans roll cyclically films about the Viet Nam or the Mundial.Pero War II, please, that the resulting product has a minimum of decorum, anything to "The thirteen roses" does not reach or to rub. We started with a start when two girls, uploaded on a stage, are trying to encourage the masses in his Republican zeal. The sequence has so much realism that seems performed by a cast of Famóbil Clicks and transmits the same emotion that a catalogue of Ikea.Y, from there, all the same. Characters that appear and disappear if we know or who they are or what painted on screen, a few design fascists resembling Armani models, a Manichaeism and a simplicity as long that you did not see on a screen. and the interrogation sequences? If Jack Bauer lifted his head.In fact, they say evil tongues that the strike of the writers in the United States.UU. It has been motivated, precisely, by having seen "The thirteen roses", demanding that the word "Script" disappears from credits that appear in its place, the legend "Pamphlet", "Cobblers" or "Sinvergonzonería".Is that I'm writing, I'm Recalling moments of the film, and I am turning even more that while he saw. The sequence in jail, splashing water to the severe prison officer. The mother running after the truck.Finally, dear Bomarzo, the road to hell is paved with good intentions, that the tragic history of thirteen Red Roses worth be told, but that this monstrosity perpetrated by Emilio Martínez Lázaro, disservice makes to his memory, and even more skinny to the recovery of historical memory dignified and respectful. And, as film, of course, is a new torpedazo in the flotation of Spanish film line, "Las 13 rosas" brings together the compendium of vices and misery that have turned to our cinematography patria in the best repellent for the Viewer: Manichean, boring, poor and is incredibly poorly written, performed worse and worse directed. "Las 13 rosas"as well as being a fraud and a fiasco, a disappointment, a scam and a penalty is, in a Word, a pigswill.Dear Bomarzo: are what we talking?With all love, OTF-outraged Patón.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2172

JLO

El diario de Ana Frank

muchocine

Claustrophobic, almost without foreign and using a couple of sets, despite the two hours and a half of duration the narrative is agile, using with intelligence and restraint the voiceover and avoiding at all times the melodrama.

The film is based on the famous diary written by Anne Frank during his stay in a room in Amsterdam, hidden with her family and other Jews escape the nazis during World War II. Living together for almost three years (12/6/42 to 4/8/44) of eight persons in equal conditions and in a very small space, they did that all kinds of situations, enriched by the pristine and lively look of the teenager emerge look Ana.Esa full of strength and passion that Ana had in his life and his art was very moved by director George Stevens (Shane)(, Giant), which allows the viewer empathy with all the characters by equal (done that it does not occur with the reading of the book), and a fidelity to the text which in this case is too positive.Claustrophobic, almost without foreign and using a couple of sets, despite the two hours and half narrative is agile, using with intelligence and restraint the voiceover and avoiding the melodrama at all times, as in the end where occurs the detention of persons, giving class of poetry and good taste. Despite being made almost fifteen years after the publication of the book, is less explicit than that concerning the sexuality of the protagonist, practically non-existent in the film beyond a hint or a kiss, although we agree that the book is not very bold to these times, worse much for the time.Other high points are firstly, the excellent photography of William C. Mellor, an intense black and white and beautiful game of contrasts, visible even in the photos that accompany the text. The music of Alfred Newman, overloaded, but used in small doses. The actions are also good and couples, highlighting Joseph Schildkraut as Anne's father, Anne's own (Millie Perkins) and the recognizable Shelley Winters as Mrs Van Daan, character which seems to lead, by his interpretation and characteristics, the mother of Stanley Kubrick's Lolita. The diary of Anne Frank produces the same feeling of rootlessness, resignation and tension than other films that deal with the same subject, showing the concentration camps, located without clash - perhaps less spectacular but no less felt - to the best contemporary exponents of the genre: Roman Polanski's the pianist and the list of Schindler of Steven Spielberg.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1832

Luis Zueco

Salvador

muchocine

In conclusion a stupendous film that reminds us that there are many reasons why living but also many ideas which worth dying.

I have seen this movie in my house again, went to see the film in his day, and follows pareciendome an excellent film. And it is not only because the plot, the excellent performance deDaniel Brühl of the actresses who performed the role of her sisters, a better every day Tristan Ulloa, Leonor Watling (one of my weaknesses), Ingrid Rubio (a totally wasted by Spanish Cinema actress) and a great Leonardo Sbaraglia.La photography and the recreation of these years in which the dictatorship started to give blows is very good. For my best part is the initial, where is Catania as formed the anarchist group, MIL, that is reprehensible in his acts (still have to live in those years to better understand), in his ideas is certainly understandable, and in his struggle, his courage and his audacity to remain outside the scope of the entire police apparatus of Franco.Una time in the x'cacelDaniel Brühl and Leonardo Sbaraglia rise the interpretative level to very high levels. Brilliant transformation of the second, basketball in the courtyard of the jail, talks,. But a scene that makes the movie is the arrival of the executioner of the garrote vil and the final scene of his execution. Cruel, scary and infinitely sad and real.Relationship with Leonor Watling is interesting, but the really important relationship has been with Ingrid Rubio. As I said one of the best and least used of Spanish cinema, that good it is.In conclusion a stupendous film that reminds us that there are many reasons why living but also many ideas which worth dying.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1264

Jesus Lens

Apocalypto

muchocine

Things should not be as Mel Gibson in his fantastic e impressive film. There are cultural and geographical history, temporary inconsistencies. But, personally, I feel like, I am not going to the cinema to receive lessons from history.

It is true. Things should not be as Mel Gibson in his fantastic e impressive film. There are cultural and geographical history, temporary inconsistencies. But, personally, I feel like, I am not going to the cinema to receive lessons from history. So are magazines, newspapers Sunday supplements and, better still, teachers!, which in the film have an excellent tool with which support, complete and illustrate their lectures.To me, when I go to the cinema, what I like is to put me squarely in the history that I hook me excited and make me have a good time, embedded in what I have from the screen. And "Apocalypto", certainly amply meets it from the first until the last frame.The visual ability of Mel Gibson is portentosa. The type takes the film got into vein, such is its ability to transmit sensations through their films. And as a Philo has found that talk of lost cultures, repressed mutinous movements to blood and fire, heroic personal and love for the family, lost and forgotten languages. It is therefore by exploiting based on well. And it is doing beautifully.Rhythm. That would be the expression that best define this "Apocalypto", whose story takes place in a temporary spectrum so concentrated, just a couple of days, that leaves you breathless. It's like that "Last Mohican", which Gibson's movie has a multitude of Parallels, you right exhausted seeing everything what ran Daniel Day Lewis & Co. In "Apocalypto", the characters run and jump all the time, a fashion which, in view of the start of the latest 007, seems that trend will mark in the coming months.More film references in this "Apocalypto": Tarzan and the African porters that fell by the cliffs and, of course, "the planet of the apes" original. And "Mad Max", of course, with its apocalyptic message, never better said. We are witnessing a brutal clash of cultures in which the noble savage faces some formidable warriors, perfect allegory of what is happening today on so many armed conflicts which would be idle to reel off. And we are witnessing a realistic recreation of what it could be big cities Mayan (or Aztec?), with its pyramids and their bloody rituals, desmembramientos and included beheadings.All this, again, cash with a pace and at a breakneck speed. I liked stakeholder, protagonists and secondary. I liked the start-up scene, costumes and feathers headdresses and the beads. I liked how the duels are resolved. I loved the escape, including jaguar. I was struck by the first foreboding encounter in the forest and I enjoyed hunting, laughter, tales and overnight in the village.Come on, that I liked everything, from beginning to end. I understand that the excesses of violence can empachar the more sensitive palates, but unfortunately, the history of mankind is tinged with blood. Specialists in Mesoamerica have pissed and criticize a certain lack of historical accuracy. Indigenous associations are mosqueadas because the vision of natives is negative. However, lovers are in luck because "Apocalypto" is simply a peliculón.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/573

Ana

A scanner darkly

muchocine

It captures the sense of a graphic novel and an epic futuristic at the same time. I can't wait to see her again. It is that Linklater released another movie this year incredible?Do Fast Food Nation?, my expectations are huge

Based on the personal experiences of Philip k. Dick (Blade runner) with drugs, this film is a wonderful hypnotic trance. Animated with a process of rotoscoping, the film builds its own visual language which lies in a magical point between photography and the animation; the real and the imaginary. Between life and the dream as was the subject of "To waking life", the previous project with this style of director Richard Linklater. Once again achieved an extraordinary experience both in the narrative and Visual, as the film should be.In these times, it is difficult to push the boundaries of imagination. We have seen so much that we have a sarcastic and detached from the future and life look. Why it works very well to talk about science fiction this work prefer to place in the near future. Everything you pose perfectly fit the neurotic life style of the era of terror in which we live and we know that technology is advancing so fast. Few elements of high technology in the film no longer exist. Except, of course, the decoder guise of identity that used the police to be unrecognizable. This element is the Summit of the visual style and at the same time captures the central theme of the film. Bob Actor (Keanu Reeves), an undercover agent, must monitor their own lives through a system of espionage by video; Since that has been implicated in the world of drugs that supposedly is doing him the guerra.¿Estamos so separated from ourselves that we can not recognize us? And if someone or something can see everything about me, including all personal information, does arrive to know who I am? I get to know myself? Or who looks through the mirror makes it in the dark, just as I see my own life? The title of the film comes from that phrase of Corinthians "we now see by mirror in dark;" but then we will see face to face: now I know in part; "but then shall know as I am known", updated at the age of bar codes.Develop a particular language would have no value if it were not forged to say something. Here he presents an important document of the problematic of identity today. In addition to not get lost in the Nebula, this film is full of humor and real and sincere dialogues. Above all the Group of jonkis with paranoia walk at home. Linklater to tested because it makes a sharp ear in "Before sunrise/suset"(Antes_deel_amanecer/atardecer) and "Dazed and confused" for sincere talks that resonate with certainties. Complex characters with dishes outstanding wash, i.e. real and this world. Actors enrich these characters, particularly Robert Downey Jr. The fact that humor works owes much to the naturalness of the rhythms of the cast.Captures the sense of a graphic novel and an epic futuristic, at the same time without leaving out to the black humor environment to paranoia. I can't wait to see her again. It is incredible that Linklater released another movie this year "Fast Food Nation", my expectations are enormous.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/421

Darthz

La joven del agua

muchocine

A film that runs along the inner world of each spectator. a more open way of seeing life and the roles that each develop or could develop; a message written in the subconscious of a beautiful music and a great beginning.

Originality is always short, and even more ingenuity. And this happens with Shymalan, that we are going to see a film, and even though we know his tricks, know as his characters and his inner world always drive to questions that it has to be done covering the show, we are surprised. And at least to me, held me captive. They are simple stories told of how at first glance may seem complicated, and not is more than a Union of small details and references on our world and the other, the largest, the imaginative, which recreates in his films. With "The girl in the water" it brings us to Earth a story, a legend, a nymph and his rocky road to return to their world. A film that runs along the inner world of each spectator who really gets into the role in the film, which accepts that more is a philosophical way to film a horror film, as the majority of the people to know the main thing believes. It is the eternal return to the question of who you are, or what role do you think that you have in this world; the enthusiasm of knowing the world boring and stereotypic can change through the imagination and the desire, the desire to make good movies, show the world what you want without being drawn by the unbridled and stupid mass. We will bring this time, the director, a more open way of seeing life and the roles that each develop or could develop; a message written in the subconscious of a beautiful music and a great start, and likewise with the end of the film, a message that does not come rather than say how to evade us ridiculous flatness of the world, with this final message, the Seagull flying above all, slowly losing by the mantle that covers us day and night: while there is life, there is hope.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4184

Rafa Ferrer

Orgullo y prejuicio

muchocine

A work to discover, that it is not flagging in their 2 hours of footage.

I'm not a fan of this type of film, moreover, do not know why the films produce me a unsustainable sense of sopor, although it is also true that as we left the cinema to see "Atonement" 2, almost to the time (we know that "Two sleeping in the same mattress become the same opinion") entered us an irremediable desire of seeing the first film as director Joe Wright, the (umpteenth) adaptation of the works of Jane Austen, "Pride and prejudice" and how the are putting on canal + each 2 by 3 (six) than better movie to see a Saturday this afternoon.On the other hand, once again, I refer to the evidence, it seems that Joe Wright has also become, not only a precedent, but also a style when it comes to his films, and is that compared with his next film you notice certain parallels that range from (quite similar) levels to the careful selection of music and it is that both are composed by Dario Marianelli. Another obvious dominant note in both is the absolute presence of Keira Knightley which I slowly managed to separate from "Pirates of the Caribbean"; and sights that cost me, because sometimes get me the stupid habit of setting a character to an actor and there is no way to take him off of him. Important also interpretations of Rosamund Pike, which knew of many films, Donald Sutherland, who do really well, as "father of the creatures" and above all Matthew Macfadyen, an actor to which known really little but makes credible and justifiable, his role as Mr.Darcy. Apart from the costume, ambiance and especially photography, with these landscapes that leave one with his mouth open and eyes as dishes, I have to say my wife will love it and after a couple of viewings made with special DVD, quite careful editing and it emulates the original book of Austen.Una work to discoverIt is not flagging in their 2 hours of footage.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3641

Calaf

Bee movie

muchocine

Entertaining movie, which will not go down the history of animation, but that will make you smile to taste without stridency.

To the rhythm of productions of today, animated films and taking into account that every time it is more difficult to surprise, Bee Movie entertains and makes you have a good time, that Yes, without being nothing out of this world.The worst is the story itself, flojita and based on facts that collide a little, as almost always intended to save communication between bugs (either bees or mice) and human.The part of jokes concerning the world of bees, work fairly well, the clever word games and quite funny phrases, joined by some cameos, like Ray Liotta or Sting, who have his grace.Visually, spectacular, although technically, it is assumed that always go to more, the action sequences are well shot, with magnificent landscapes of Central Park flights, as well as the activity within the hive.As for characters, a little poor, but enough to sustain itself.Squeaking me, (as it is the case in many American films) that ego centrism that are erected spokespersons and protagonists, until for blooming flowers from around the world and repopulating Central Park, they save the planet.In the final analysis. Witty at times, smile with more than one laugh, for children and adults, but not only for some or for others, what makes staying a bit in no man's land.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3243

Tito Chinchan

Operación Mata-Hari

muchocine

Film about swindlers which are caught in a Web of international espionage. It is not too advisable, since it is quite loose and humor remain distant. Only the pair of main actors gives you a speck of interest.

Lovers anonymous meeting, 9 am. "Good morning, my name is Tito Chinchan and recognize that." "I like Gracita Morales." This woman's voice makes me laugh a lot, also reminds me my sister-in-law, her it imitates to perfection and I rio twice. Bad thing is that I had never seen a whole film, and I certainly finished dizzy. Although everything is allowed to women that said "the señoooorito" with that rintintín never matched.The film is about a black man that has a microalgo and kill you anything else start the film. Another black takes the witness until he meets a pair of con artists of middling (José Sazatornil and Gracita Morales). Since that time, we have a comedy of persecutions and shot with hundreds of young girls in bí-kí-ní (that would say the great Saza) in the agony of the Franco regime. It smacks of moral relaxation on all four sides.I have the toddler so accustomed to see these gems of films on Sunday morning that accommodates up already to see with one hand below the diaper. Pity that in this the censors of the caudillo still not allowed the joy felpudiana years later. The story is pretty bad, with a sobreactuado Saza and a Gracita without payload fairing that save from the wreck to the footage. It becomes quite heavy, despite being very it cortita, although it has nice moments. I only stay with the phrase tontez "your kisses must know chocolate" of an actor of great similar to Martinez the facade while trying to kiss the exotic actress. Well, and explains when not drugs.In short, film about swindlers which are caught in a Web of international espionage. It is not too advisable, given that it is quite loose and humorous points remain distant. Only the pair of main actors gives you a speck of interest. It would be better to have called "operation Bí-kí-ní".kisses.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2072

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Flores rotas

muchocine

Commendable for its insightful portrayal of the loneliness of a wealthy, retired, donjuan who returns to the past to find a meaning to life.

Broken flowers is an existential road movie, an intimate catalogue of emotional adventures of an autobiographical languid, deep, conscious of their marginality (such as the own Jim Jarmursch) and embarked in the very noble and worthy task to seek a child who does not know and who has news for a letter pink that it makes you remember the women he loved and who will return to find it. This mild mcguffin encourages a zany neighbor fond of detective investigations, which just convincing him to leave the ostracism of his idyllic life encapullada and perfect, except because the last girlfriend has left him, which only is altered by the missive fuse of the plot.Very few acting records of Murray, for whom the director wrote the screenplay, favor the delinquencies of the trip: its introspective decline, its ability to exasperate our wishes for action be speeded up, Jarmusch is not interested in classical patterns but it feels more comfortable (Night on earth, what more splendid film) in small episodes that are assembling so, in the end, complete a unit that turns out to be the film that we are watching. Murray makes a Mimetic extension of its work in Lost in translation. His solitude is reflected in the kitsch of his home, in his retirement, in a peculiar way to understand their relationship with the world. Don Johnston, as away of romances, living lover placid retirement donjuanesca, makes the journey back to its past with the perspective that nothing of what it finds should be amended in excess its natural habitats, its sophisticated hi-fi, his large home for solo usufruct. Except the neighbour with pretensions of Sam Spade, all the characters in these broken flowers are individuals defeated by routine, adocenados, romantically immature, as the own Johnston, whose girlfriend (Julie Delphy) he has made precisely for this reason. Other brides, the old ones, are evidence that the world revolves and that no was better last time especially because already autumn Heartthrob who has returned ever found traces of what was a love of youth but sad, when not pathetic, women to the same edge of the vital disenchantment. Gives equally whatever widow sexy with his Lolita Haze to lap (great and little exploited Sharon Stone), the ex-hippy now happily inserted in the job chain, the ill-tempered repellent or, finally, lesbian concerned about animal rights (my always beloved Jessica Lange). Oh, forgot the girlfriend spread.Broken flowers is independent film, although I still am not sure what is this to say. About the independence I say this because it viscerally away from another film worked in its commercial representation, his need to please over other artistic considerations. It is also literary film, and that they have very clear what is: forged from the word cinema, written with the caress of a goldsmith who reinvent the nineteenth-century novel once a terrifying fire her would have deleted all libraries, private funds and the wide and always alien world libraries. Goldsmith is Jarmusch: their material is not entirely linguistic. As a good filmmaker, knows to suggest with a travelling (in the beginning) that coming as well as use glances, minimalist records of their actors and actresses to achieve what, on occasions, the Word does not reach. That is the magic of cinema. This is a charm. By this miracle life is always beautiful, but all have from time to time to navigate murky waters and the days are left herrumbrar by the stale air of the routine and the tedium. I do not speak in the first person. Necessarily.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4351

Moebius

Laura

muchocine

"Laura" meant stardom for several names now immortal on celluloid, and is a title to highlight in this splendid film noir genre.

Rouben Mamoulian had been removed from the project. Any director enough Prestige was available. He was the producer, a Viennese of nearly forty years, who took over the direction of the film. His experience was not too abundant: a few minor films had alternated with works on Broadway since he emigrated from Austria, fleeing the nazi madness. His name was Otto Preminger, and Laura was intended to be the movie that launched him to stardom, as it did with the two protagonists of the film, Gene Tierney and Dana Andrews.Un ironic and hard detective of police, McPherson, was responsible for investigating the murder of a famed publicist, Laura Hunt. In his wheel of interrogation of suspects attends the House of Waldo Lydecker, a brilliant and hedonistic radio columnist who is has characterized by a great interest in the black Chronicle. Through his statement we UNGASS in the time to learn about the history of Laura and the events leading up to his death.Long ago a young Laura tries to Lydecker to be advertising for a pen. Bothered during their lunch by the impetuous young writer her dispatches in a bad way. However, he was impressed by the personality of the beautiful girl. Later he will attend her work to apologize and accept the offer of the publicist. It will be the beginning of a long friendship that Lydecker (much older than her) will become a protective and fatherly figure, the feelings of Lydecker to Laura will be increasingly confused.At a party Laura meets Shelby Carpenter, a ruined and vividor landowner is supported under the protection of the Mrs Ann Treadwell, a woman of good position which is in love with Carpenter. However, after meeting Laura, Carpenter attempts to seduce without much success at first, until that past time will be instructing to make wedding plans. Lydecker, who despises Carpenter, try by all means prevent the wedding, coming to reveal Laura a relationship that keeps the Gigolo with a young model who works in the same agency of Miss Hunt. Doubting whether or not to break the commitment, Laura retreats to his home. Shortly thereafter, a Friday, Laura calls Lydecker cancelling an appointment for dinner that had that same night. Some hours later discovered his body.After all this detective plot hides a great secret, a hidden fact that will turn the plot in the most unexpected moment. Detective McPherson will be discovering a complicated tangle of romantic relationships, feelings, jealousy and emotional games in which is will be complicating is a total way, to the point that will be obsessed with the portrait of the deceased Laura, discovering that the magnetism of this woman is so powerful that persists even after his death. With such convoluted tangle of interests and half-truths as plot printed in a quick script and brilliant lines of dialogue, and a flawless direction, Laura is its own right one of the great titles of the film noir, containing traditions of the genre (starting with the work of Agatha Christie) and elements of previous tapes such as the Maltese Falcon and is linked to later as the intricate Hitchcock.El Vertigo films script (although seen today maybe not what) (so much) stands out by its vibrant fabric in the regular line of the whodunnit and that kind of phrases ("do not use stylus, I use a goose feather dipped in poison") that turn the classic film noir into a really delicious genus. On the other hand, Otto Preminger builds the facts in a clear and concise way, without beating about the Bush, a style that however kept being usual at the time. Aided by a splendid picture, Preminger surrounds the tape of an oneiric halo, especially in certain shots of Gene Tierney, whose beauty, on the other hand, is portrayed in sublime form Laura.As I have already said, the film elevated Tierney and Andrews to the category of big stars. Laura Hunt is one of the definitive roles of the Tierney, (I never tire of saying it) wonderful creature that makes me think that God exists. Laura his stage charisma and its port are captured on the screen as rarely managed to do so; In addition, the interpretation of the actress reaches Captivate as captive to the scathing Lydecker. For its part, Dana Andrews (for many years thought that it would be a woman!) also stands out as the typical gambling and foul-mouthed detective of the genre; Although it cannot be compared with Detective portraits of the great Bogart, the good of Andrews knew to live up to the occasion and give his character a hook good enough to collect role in certain key scenes. Vincent Price, who plays the womanizer Carpenter, comes out unscathed with his usual charisma; While his character is too ungrateful to shine with their own light, its mere presence is enough to remind us of the great actor who was this man. Mrs Treadwell, the admirer of Carpenter, has the face of Judith Anderson, the unforgettable Lady Rebecca keys. Impossible overcome or further match a role as well, but his unflappable face perfectly adapts to his role in the film.A separate chapter deserves Clifton Webb, an actor imposed by Preminger for greater tantrum of the all-powerful Darryl f. Zanuck, who the homosexuality of the aristocratic Webb should remove you the dream. Luckily for the film, Zanuck and the own Webb, returning to the cinema after an exile that dated back to the beginning of talkies, Preminger rescued you that he interpreted the bifid dandy Lydecker. Clifton Webb is simply immeasurable, and fits into the role as elegantly as they do fit suits. Theirs are the best quotes of the film, as well as most of the scenes in which it participates. A ten for him.Another element of the film that has remained in memory is the main theme of the same, also titled "Laura" and composed by David Raksin. Although personally to me tells me much, can not deny is a beautiful composition, and many insurance moviegoers who have among their favorite.Laura meant stardom for several names now immortal on celluloid, and is a title to highlight in this splendid film noir genre.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1152

Caruco

La Caja Kovak

muchocine

Does Alfred Hitchcock entering in?The twilight?. Thus could be defined the new proposal of the film excrítico Daniel Monzón.

Alfred Hitchcock entering "The twilight zone" (The twilight zone). The new proposal for the excrítico of film Daniel Monzón putting in serious distress and treats a novelist science fiction, David Norton (Timothy Hutton), could be defined as well while it rests in Mallorca.Un fatal fan, a fateful melody, suicide inexpicable of the people around him and a labyrinthine conspiracy orchestrated by the own monsoon and screenwriter Javier Guerricaechevarría, who takes borrowed from Alex Iglesia.Apasionado and simpatiquísimo in personDaniel Monzón, as director, had left me open-mouthed, by bad that was!, with "The heart of the Warrior". On the other hand, his previous title, cleptómana comedy "The biggest robbery never told" possessed a ritmazo, execution and brilliant performances.A model of comedy, if not outside who, for reasons of work, were also exactly 25 minutes, the last of the film, which I saw. You have to see what you earn some movies with a short montage!.A box of surprises.So imagínenese my willingness to confront me with this new proposal and all its length of almost 2 hours. But here, hete we encounter before a film so careful as elegant invoice, a pace paused but not weary and with a less predictable script of what one might assume.And this despite the fact that not all the shackles of los cabos always loose are credible in this puzzle game, who knows even resolve the sequences of increased tension, and in the interior of the coves of the Drac with a dignísima correction (this handkerchief entangled in the motor of a boat!).I think that this invention starring Lucia Jimenez and Timothy Hutton, you like more to that Rod Serling to Hitchcock. Worst thing is that despite ingenious of some of his ideas, it is the feeling of a forgettable product. But it is in film, or recovering it in DVD, would not escape this opportunity to check that the filmmakers here also know good storytelling flavored mystery.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1961

Rafa Ferrer

Robocop

muchocine

When it was nano? do if I wondered were my favorite movies you answered without thinking twice that the?Batman? Tim Burton (another great visual jewel) and the first film by Verhoeven. Almost like back to my childhood.

Absolutely blown away I left when alla by year 1987 discovered the visual wonder of Paul Verhoeven truth is when it was "nano" if I wondered were my favorite movies you answered without thinking twice that "Batman" from Tim Burton (another great visual jewel) and the first film by Verhoeven and now that taking advantage of than the Robocop trilogy has fallen into my hands the trilogy on DVD have chosen the first installment (la) (best of all) to watch again. Say that perhaps no me has excited as I was thrilled at the time, although there are phrases that I know from memory of the tape as "there is a new type in the city, is called Robocop" or almost at the end of the film when he faces "the bad" and says "do I wanted?" Hehe, that flipe! Great interpretations of Peter Weller and Nancy Allen on the other hand would continue in the saga as companion of Murphy (aka Robocop) however only Weller made the first of the films, and was then replaced, although I always you I've seen somewhere that another film not have been able to I forget this role that marked my childhood. The main theme of the film is also one authentic past, and although the film is repeated endlessly (perhaps that is) fails to empalagar at any time an almost epic melody that excellently accompanies the action of the film by Paul Verhoeven.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3314

Francisco Bellón

El Asesinato de Jesse James por el Cobarde Robert Ford

muchocine

It is a film reference in the final months of 2007, and offers the possibility of enjoying one of the best performances of the year, a Brad Pitt who deservedly won the Volpi Cup at the Venice Film Festival, and is presented as a serious candidate to the Oscar's.

There are few figures in United States that are well-known and are part of the popular culture of its society as Jesse James. For many, the Bushranger feared and reputed a disillusioned idealist who continued a losing war of the 19th century, for others. What is sure is that its about forged a legend and myth, that have survived to our days.The film has led on many occasions the life of Jesse James to the big screen, so Andrew Dominik decided to give the story a new approach, distancing themselves from the best-known facet of James and focusing on his last months of life. It does not through the eyes of the mythical Bushranger, but that you do from the perspective of the man that ended with the legend. Based on the novel by Ron Hansen, the assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford is an approach to the man that was behind the myth, showing his more human side, but also their miseries and turn dark and tormented. At a leisurely pace, without being tired or bored, Dominik goes telling the viewer a story exciting hooked from the beginning and able to maintain attention despite its more than two hours and a half of duration. But beyond the achievements of Dominik emerges the omnipresent figure of Brad Pitt, who performed an extraordinary composition full of nuances which consolidates as one of the finest actors of the time. Casey Affleck and Sam Rockwell performed at the same time very good jobs.The assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford is a film reference in the final months of 2007, and offers the possibility of enjoying one of the best performances of the year, a Brad Pitt who deservedly won the Volpi Cup at the Venice Film Festival, and is presented as a serious candidate to the Oscar's.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/742

Jeremy Fox

Hijos de los hombres

muchocine

One of the most overwhelming beautiful films of the year. A touching futuristic fable, lasts, shocking at times, and which can continue talking for hours out of the film.

If only a few days ago I spoke of the great fable about our past made by Guillermo del Toro, now it is the turn to another Mexican director who in turn created a brilliant fable of our future.Based on the novel by P.D. James, "Sons of the men" (Children of Men) immerses us in the world of 2027, where wars and terrorism are only part of the problem. The greatest tragedy of humanity is that women have lost their ability to have children. 18 Years ago that does not originate any human being and, therefore, the species is endangered?One of the main virtues of the tape is that when I say that it immerses us in the world of the future I mean exactly that. During the almost two hours that the film lasts, and that by the way they spend in a sigh, the spectator lives in this world. He is fully aware of the tragedy of the lack of babies on the planet and the importance that born one. In this way, fully understands the hopeless nihilism of Theo (a magnificent Clive Owen), the desperate struggle of Julian (the always brilliant Julianne Moore) and the descreída hope to change the world of Jasper (Michael Caine that already nobody doubts it, is one of the great).Several are the elements used by Alfonso Cuarón to put us both in the history. The first of these is a brilliant address artistic, credible and very realistic, retains many similarities with today's world but clearly outlines the differences to help the Viewer to imagine better what has happened between now and the future.Another important element is the special way of filming the movie, with a predilection for the camera in hand and the plano-secuencia that give some moments a semi-documentary tone that provides an exciting and frightening verism. Obviously this would not be possible without the imposing work of Emmanuel Lubezki, cinematographer who already you will must an oscarAñádase to what a beautiful soundtrack, fitted like a glove to every moment of the film, and that goes from the "Bring on the Lucie" of John Lennon to the brilliantly appropriate "Kindertotenlieder" of Gustav Mahler.El result: one of the most overwhelming beautiful films of the year. A touching futuristic fable, lasts, shocking at times, and which can continue talking for hours out of the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2584

Ramón Balcells

Harry Potter y la orden del Fénix

muchocine

It would have been a real crappy if it would have worried the sub-plots of teenagers and he had quit this dreamlike and terrifying part that characterizes both. Perhaps fails to the mastery of the third part, but yes I think it is the second best in the series.

When premiered Harry Potter and the prisoner of Azkaban everyone looked forward thinking film saga of the young English magician had matured since it was darker, more adult and intelligent than the previous two of Columbus (the first, however, I liked quite). Alfonso Cuarón, therefore, marked a new stage, that soon faded with the infant and weak quarter, of Mike Newell. Fortunately, as we all expected, the fifth installment again that style that Cuarón left marked, leaving children's arguments and focusing on what really matters, gloomy. I think that Harry Potter and the order of the Phoenix would have been a real crappy if it would have worried the sub-plots of teenagers and he had quit this dreamlike and terrifying part that characterizes both. Perhaps fails to the mastery of the third part (the script is what most reeling), but yes I think it is the second best in the series.It is not as irregular as the Newell's (or less!), but notes several times that there something is missing. The biggest problem is that they have tried reducing 800-odd penalties pages in a two-hour and little (this is the shortest of the saga film, also). And this reduction, despite being generally correct, lacks some (somewhat secondary) plots to follow the thread throughout the film. Anyone who reads the fifth book I am well insurance that would take it from beginning to end, but who has not yet done so will cost a little more. Even and thus the script not just be quite well, as several times the film is repeated and leaves other loose frames unfinished resolved (as the "gags" Filch, who are too repetitivios and the already boring end). This would be his biggest mistake, but without doubt, Harry Potter and the order of the Phoenix has many more successes than failures. The second and final flaw that I find is his cast. It is not that the players are wrong, is that they look not so much like pudiésen. And that, in part, is because of David Yates, the director. Especially the side that barely have time to say a couple of phrases (the characters of Lupin, Bellatrix Lestrange, Nimphadora Tonks, Moody and even the already not as secondary Lord Voldemort, who only appears in the final part, and not too much). At least the young protagonists are the focus of the film, so yes appear often, and the new and excellent incorporation, Imelda Staunton looks like any other character. But I shall leave it to the cast later. Only comment that the tape missing minutes, both to eliminate entire complete argument that secondary actors look as in the previous installments. I forgot to comment that there are a couple of scenes that could have been refined enough, such as the death of Sirius (all know that right? died,) or the final battle, which could have been lengthened several minutes more, since it is somewhat confusing and too short.But as I said, the result of this film is more than satisfactory, so I shall begin to comment on the aspects which have most attracted me. First of all, highlight the setting. The darkness and the whole tenebrosidad is more appealing, for me, this movie. Also highlight the technical section, which no wonder or the least receiving a nomination for the Oscar next year. There are a lot of scenes unforgettable (and more emotional all common thing which I think is great) and that in addition they resemble how the book reflected them: the struggle between Voldemort and Dumbledore, while missing some minutes to be spectacular; Dolores Umbridge forcing write to Harry with his pen; the kiss between the magician and Cho Chang, much more daring than I expected; Harry dizzy while the Weasley brothers escape and the public applauds them, and consequent Hermione look (this girl becoming best acts); Snape and Oclumancia lectures (pity that flash-back that you all know has changed of place in the film and is too short); Harry teaching her "Army" to exercise the most dangerous magic, in that room very well reflected on the book; everything related to the Ministry of magic (very attentive to the asensor-cabina); Harry nightmares, very well made; and many more scenes which I can not remember exactly. It is clear that Harry Potter and the order of the Phoenix has really prodigious sequences, but I must also highlight various technicalities as photography (very, very good and intelligent), excellent music by John Williams, suitable for each of the scenes, and the always outstanding effects, this time does not exceed such uncontrolled way in the fourth and are very well placed (look at the brother of Hagrid).As discussed above, the cast of the film not just take. Moreover, virtually all secondary (with the exception of Dumbledore, Umbridge and Arthur Weasley) are quite untapped, because they are only a few minutes and don't have time for reciting witty dialogues, as they did (all) in the Cuarón. Ralph Fiennes (Lord Voldemort), nor appearing too (only in the final part), just fight and drop screams, so no you can see his terrifying appearance at all (as it did in the fourth). However, there is an actress that looks like none, and this is Imelda Staunton, who plays Dolores Umbridge, the new Inquisitor for Howarts is out of danger and more disciplined, although this do so in their own way. His performance is superb, full of nuances and looks that only she can do. It gives up more fear than the own Voldemort, punishments are terribly unpleasant and voice (in English) is priceless. She is the strong point of the film, which does not fall at any time. As usual, the trio protagonist just does not get it wrong, but I think that Emma Watson and Rupert Grint are even better than Radcliffe, which remains the same agonies as always, even when not so bad (like many young actors today). Other young people have good moments (pay attention to the new addition, Evanna Lynch, perhaps the girl that does best), and especially Michael Gambon, as great as always. Nor would like to mention the actions of Emma Thompson (his scene is one of the more emotional) or Robbie Coltrane (very good, but also short appearances in the cabin and the forest). To end, say that the incredible opening of the film leaves that the Potter family (uncles and his cousin) will look as well as the third, showing their cold, arrogant and distant you facets. Harry Potter and the order of the Phoenix is a good movie, full of magic and darkness, and, moreover, is entretenidísima. Some small plots have been changed (or deleted) of the book, it is somewhat repetitive and many side do not appear enough (some seem even cameos), but her however, put in second place after Cuarón, either by its enormous ability to catch the Viewer by its elegant design of production, for being more adult, by the tenebrosidad of the set or the grandiose Imelda Staunton. Those who have not read the book they are very attentive and think that here things are missing, and those who have done, enjoy both as you did with Azkaban.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3512

Francisco Bellón

Beowulf

muchocine

Beowulf is a milestone in the evolution and development of digital animation, but as a film is really bland and dull, lacks the grandeur of the epic tale adapted surprisingly

Following the release of Beowulf, are few voices suggesting that this is the future of cinema, which is the beginning of a new conception of what is the film itself. Perhaps so, but when opened Final Fantasy also said the same six years have passed since then, and with the exception of Robert Zemeckis, the film remains what it was.First and foremost, Beowulf is a visual prodigy showing in all its splendor the almost unlimited capacity of digital animation, and certainly will become a reference movie for that reason. However, Beowulf, as movie leaves much to be desired, and is that you being the adaptation of an epic tale, history lacks completely of greatness and precisely epic elements. On the other hand, it goes without all the usual Sanctimony of Hollywood, and is a tape of the characteristics of Beowulf, in order to be credible, requests shouts the director shows the rawness of a battle and is not concerned in search for the perfect Pirouette so that the hero is not see the shames (ridiculous scene where they exist). Against such background, lost interest very quickly, and the only thing to keep the audience in suspense is perhaps the so expected, marketed and publicized appearance of the character of Angelia Jolie, separate mojigaterías, one of the Summit of the digital animation in the film.Beowulf is a milestone in the evolution and development of digital animation, but as film is really bland and dull, lacks the grandeur of the epic tale adapted surprisingly.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4334

Iñaki Bilbao

La noche de los diablos

muchocine

Inspired, more harm than good in a play, nothing less, Leo Tolstoy, where were these mysterious and terrifying creatures: the Wurdalak.Sin however, the film is rather boring, quite slow and with few moments of dramatic intensity.

"At a place away from the Russian steppe, comes a businessman in the city, which bears a timber business." He wants to meet with another man to reach an agreement and carry your company great amount of wood.Bundled before two paths, he extends his car by the worst of them, when it is night. At any given time you think to see a woman wandering the roads and almost hit him. Suddenly not viewed, but the crankcase of the car has been seriously damaged.Wandering through the forest, it is a strange family composed of the grandfather, three children, a beautiful daughter and the fascinating widow of another son who just bury."You must spend the night with them, learning that the woman believed to see in reality is one witch, a not dead, a Wurdalak, which seeks someone alive to become one like her".Criticism always said of her that, although mediocre, was superior to many of hair that were made back then in the early 1970s. And it may be true, but it is still rather poor. Inspired, more harm than good in a play, nothing less, Leo Tolstoy, where were these mysterious and terrifying creatures: the Wurdalak.Sin however, the film is rather boring, quite slow and with few moments of dramatic intensity. At all times it seems that something truly good visual impact of terror, there is even content, but the truth is that they go through the minutes and the sense of loss of time is increasing.Only the first twenty minutes, until that a flash-back us back to the Russian steppe, are fine. We still don't know what awaits us and the presentation of the protagonist is eye-catching and very mysterious. But, except scenes such as the confrontation between the grandfather and the Wurdalak or the end of the film, which is not bad but it is not bad, the rest is sometimes mediocre and others simply silly.The special effects seen today are ridiculous, although in those days they were fine, but since we saw "A man lobo-americano in London" above seems rather sloppy.Very beautiful Teresa Gimpera and Agostina Belli and convincing Gianni Garko, an Italian actor who his famous character "Sartana" gave immense popularity, but him typecast, think, seriously, because it had a higher than average quality. Ah! And this comment should be subject to the copy that I saw, that is, which issued by a Spanish payment channel. Most likely it was, apart from a copy in a pretty bad state, with streaks and all, I guess it was the version that premiered in Spain. It is well known that some co-productions between Spain and some foreign country had the particularity that, in other countries aired complete. In Spain, however, is mutiliaba when there were increases tone, i.e., erotic. or very violent scenes. The full version of this film and that some will be lucky enough to see, perhaps, but I speak of that I saw that Yes, seemed quite cut.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2692

Ivan Sainz-Pardo

Ovejas Asesinas

muchocine

Sheep killer part of a horny idea which not are you gets no party and positioned to the final product as a mere anecdote, a film more than serie B of the lot.

Necessarily be leaving the brain at home and also attend in the company the film in order to enjoy this film. It is not capable of surprise or show originality at any time and get approved because it offers more or less what it promises, although always without going beyond imitate with a talented effrontery films of the same genre. Jonathan King has resigned to fear and suspense and opted for the traditional gore with comic overtones, so that we can enjoy of the desparrame of guts, of female genital mutilation and laugh with some humorous moments, but above all can comment and laugh, for that it be accompanied, bad that is in the movie.Also, if we tired it, we can play to try to hit that another film reminds us of this scene and where we saw this one, because the truth is that "The black sheep" is quite boring on numerous occasions despite its restrained footage. Explicit references to the great and also New Zealand "Braindead" by Peter Jackson, time of match and propeller aircraft to the "Indiana Jones" and so one after another.Sheep killer part of a horny idea which not are you gets no party and positioned to the final product as a mere anecdote, a film more than serie B of the lot.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2619

Jesus Lens

Los Simpson: La Película

muchocine

Everything that happens in the movie is incredible. If you get to think about the amount of things that go from the first to the last frame, is to flip it. The amount of winks, jokes and laughing.

The moment where Homer gets up, pissed, in the middle of a film by scratch and Pica and says do not understand why an entry of cinema has paid to see something that could have tasted free at home, turning towards the camera and calling pringá you to all those who were in the film, marks the style of a hilarious filmNice, acid, scathing and scoundrel, which is exactly what we always expect the yellow family.I not follow regularly the Simpsons on TV, which did not have very clear if something particularly important had happened in Springfield in recent years it conditional me viewing of the film. But not. Everything seemed to be equal: Moe, Homer, Bart, the tontita of Lisa, Marge pragmatics, the detestable Burns, etc.Therefore, to enjoy playing. To enjoy seeing an EE.UU. txaranga and tambourine, always lucid eyes of Matt Groening, by evil that is, you can always go to worse. The protagonists? In addition to the usual - that in a display of script, leave all - it is the lavish and all-powerful President of the United States, Arnie; and or subject so concerned about the environment that could be a paranoid transcript of the argument relates to the Gore.Y, as not, above the theme star of all agendas in the world: climate change. Watch the heavy environmentalists take years and years giving grilled with global warming, the ozone layer and the melting of the poles. Because now, suddenly, ranks high on the agendas of everyone in the world is? or is intended to be - someone.And Groenning does not lose occasion of sticking the finger in the eye of both enrollao welfare, Homer becoming an environmental cuasiterrorista, Springfield in a sort of town of South deep American, with its akelarres and hangings. There is a flight to paradise lost, a love story, a tremendous confusion of personality, the return of the hero.Everything that happens in the movie is incredible. If you get to think about the amount of things that go from the first to the last frame, is to flip it. The amount of winks, jokes and laughing.For example, do commented something about the poster that appears at one point, with the legend "Hillary 2008"? And without any kind of criticism, a single frame of subliminal advertising.And, in the end, because all so happy, joyful and festive. The bet to move the series to the big screen has left either to a Groenning which remains in a State of grace and that, possibly, see reinforced ratings of his series on television around the world.They deserve.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1766

Iñaki Bilbao

El hombre atrapado (Man Hunt)

muchocine

It has undoubted narrative force and its climax is surround, thanks mainly to the impressive photography in black and white. First openly anti-Nazi film of Fritz Lang.

"A Hunter moved to Germany with the intention to hunt some deer, for example." A day is at the top of a hill the figure of Adolf Hitler, he points with his telescopic but not shoot because it is not a murderer. However at that moment is captured and tortured by the Gestapo. "He escapes and returns to London, where will continue to persecuted."Interesting film of Fritz Lang, the first of his films that played the thematic antinazi openly. It has undoubted narrative force and its climax is surround, thanks mainly to the impressive photography in black and white, very suggestive, and ominous shadows. The staging is superb. However, and perhaps therefore as bleak, is a both opresora insofar as that might be to some ugliness Viewer. But the tape like to be admirably narrated and a pace expressing that reaches passionate at times. Well Joan Bennett, excellent as always.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2020

Tyler

Los amantes del círculo polar

muchocine

The film by Medem has no pace, it is corny, amanerado, forced, long, silly and boring. Nobody believed those so stupid characters.

Well, consideration for this (sorry) Basque director is well known Spanish in our country.If you look at his filmography will be an absolute obsession is his person for being "different", as that which is called "original". None of his movies is conventional or tries to be, quite the contrary, his filmography is a huge pretentiousness. An intention to draw attention to and talk about the world and change it. By that his movies are like pieces of life and analysis of the human psyche. Pretentious that can reach this director is incredible.The film that we are talking about, "The lovers of the Polar circle" is possibly one of the most boring, pretentious, stupid and pretentious history movies.Without a storyline, it shows different moments in the life of Otto and Ana, since that they are small until they are older. There is no history, only moments. without ningñun kind of plot or momentum. He is and do you interesting with many jumps in time "because it", without any reason. The thing of telling a story in non-chronological order is all very well, but has to be about something. look at Tarantino, Nolan, Ritchey. his movies are jumps in time reasoned by own narrative of the story. It has to be counted as well to have a complete sense. "Perfect robbery", "Countess barefoot". films that do what they do because they have to do. The film by Medem has no pace, it is corny, amanerado, forced, long, silly and boring. Nobody believed those so stupid characters. It's like a movie about "Cool". The movie does not know where to start, has no approach or conclusion, tries to be, by the way, an exercise in novedosidad. Medem is of these managers who believe that being original is the most important thing. In the film there is no rules... breaking them is good, look for new things. No friend, the film is something much more closed. At the time of writing there are things that are going to mass. And this is the case.A script that you can remove and put things and does not change anything. It is as if it weren't on anything. Or you discover anything or not. Medem is believed to be the most important thing tell at the moral level, and fills the tape of quotations, phrases and existential talks that lead nowhere. Anything physical happens.A failed movie. boring and nonsense, I'll take the words of Carlos Boyero (with which I am not always agree) "is a pseudorománica bullshit".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2634

Bruji

Planet Terror

muchocine

Rightly, bad. Divertidamente vomit. Absolutely brilliant. Robert Rodriguez leaves us one of those lies that have always contributed to enlarge the film.

Rightly, bad. Divertidamente vomit. Absolutely brilliant. The exact point in which the impossible, anomalous, Chavacano and absurd converge at the counter of the casquero, to unleash that another way of understanding the film which is the series B. Without a doubt, the film that only Robert Rodriguez could conceive, understand and shoot without fear to lose its prestige as a filmmaker.The Grindhouse project is a tribute to the American cinemas which, in the 1970s and 1980s, projected low-budget films. Those that, according to Robert Rodriguez, "had good ideas, but lacked the means to materialise". I guess to them that, later, began to populate the first albaceteños video-club, who was assiduous. It is composed of two films, which we discussed today and Quentin Tarantino's Death Proof, among which are inserted four fictional trailers of films signed by usual genre directors such as Eli Roth, Rob Zombie and Edgar Wright, and the own Rodríguez., non-existent in reality, the invention is not new, nor when is about to make a parody of horror films, see (or better, not) stupid saga Scary Movie; or when a homage to the double session is proposed. Let us remember that in 1978 Stanley Donen filmed Movie, Movie, consisting of two other films, a drama that revolves around a boxer, title dynamite hands, and a musical called the beauties of Baxter, 1,933; precisely, to honor the double session of the cinema of the 1930s.In countries like Britain, United States, or Australia, the Grindhouse lot Debuts complete; in the rest of the world, it is decomposed, because we would "not we understand this type of format". When is the truth that, to understand until we understand that we will have to pay double for what others have acquired in a two for one, and that, under the guise of its extended duration, one tries to justify his dramatic failure at the box office.In this way, and waiting for the exciting pursuit of car that promises the history of Tarantino, we are left with the genius written, directed, photographed, mounted and "music" by Robert Rodriguez, the idea that only he could conceive, understand and filming, and that will keep the viewer out of orbit since the appearance of Machete, to be unspeakable in version X, until the culminating moment in which a go gó of disco fires with a machine gun being false leg.At all times, Planet Terror is intended to be a series B horror film, and succeeds thanks to the effects of digitization that they simulate the damaged celluloid, with frames that are striped and spotted, with the loss of color and sound, aderezados by an infernal Assembly, if you are interested in. Similarly, both the argument based on improvised heroes fighting against an army of zombies as characters, pursue identical goal; reaching the misplacement of the scroll issue 4, that in Spanish cinema would have never lost. But in the midst of this soundtrack of poor quality, that picture impossible, their repetitive and intentionally painful, dialogues of the indecent atmosphere that recreates external flat assumptions gathered under economic hardship, emerges "useless number 12 talent" to make way for a brilliant script, a careful editing and special effects that have little to do with the Grindhouse that pays homage.Against the typical scenes drawn from those unforgettable movies, decidedly bad, we love so much in the past, in which "the good", empty look, was detained when he tried to save the world, and the cable of an electric saw is always desenchufaba to avoid the massacre; We find the sequence Summit filmed George Romero in 1968, the achievement of a truck to escape from those infected, and the fuel pump that breaks out in the air. We also recognize in the blue eyes, Bloodshot, of untold tears of the scared blonde (Marley Shelton), situations that Giorgio Ferroni invented for Teresa Gimpera (the night of the Devils, 1,972).To configure the rest of the cast, as did the producers of night of the living dead, but for different reasons; Rodriguez becomes surround its nearest surroundings. Some relatives (his son and his nieces, the twin Kangaroo), the members of the technical team make-up (the veteran artist Tom Savini), and his collaborators and friends, leaving the roles actors for actors from television series, Rose McGowan (charmed) and Freddy Rodriguez (to six feet under). It is interesting to check the insistence that shows Tarantino, the last of the classics by Ava Gardner.Puede to be true, that "to the goals they will force when we talk about them", but is a fact that the bruja-metralleta already is an incono of the fantasy genre, and that Robert Rodriguez is not only removed a thorn to shoot a zombie, but that leaves us one of those lies that have always contributed to enlarge the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3843

Ana Belén Pacheco

August Rush (El Triunfo de un Sueño)

muchocine

It could be defined as a simple and emotional musical story suitable for all audiences.

As a lover of music, nearly so much as the film, any proposal that is able to unify both arts seems very attractive why, despite the terrible poster who used distributors in Spain for August Rush, could not pass the opportunity to see things so shocking as the guitar shock or delight me with songs performed by the selfsame Jonathan Rhys Meyers (that same thing put you Henry VIII of grunge with equal) (success) Freddie Highmore, is Evan (aka August Rush) an orphan who is able to see and hear music everywhere. In addition to the music he argues that you listen to the voices of their parents and therefore decides to escape to fetch them. Will soon discover a special talent to play instruments, inherited, even without knowing it, of their parents, that will develop as a way to find them.The film actually does not enjoy an exceptional quality and possibly if we remove the musical numbers would be little more than a pleasant chapter of a children's series (very frame looking for his mother) but the combination it really alluring and magical in equal parts by the three protagonists: Freddie Highmore (seen in finding Neverland and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory)Keri Russell (which finally lifts head very decently) and Jonathan Rhys Meyers (which I will not add anything else because it would clearly sound biased). It could be defined as a simple and emotional musical story suitable for all audiences.The major slump of the film comes from the hand of the unclassifiable Robin Williams as always sobreactuado and unbearable in a sort of pseudo trip to Oliver Twist as "the magician" an exploitative child musical eccentric (because of course, a child prodigy of eleven had put an end to a troubadour of fair) who teaches him to exploit the musical talent playing in the street. This part of the story is absolutely and even get to do heavy (not only by the presence of the said actor) not worthy a final result correct and quite entertaining.Attention to Terrence Howard, who plays the wizard of minors because everything portends that she will be his year cinematically speaking.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3017

Bloody Will

Sin reservas

muchocine

New example of misleading media promotion. ?No reservations? It is a dramón in his first 45 minutes, and an unclassifiable genus in the rest. If you want to laugh, or at least smile, this is not that looking.

If anyone wondered where was the romantic comedy of this autumn, which continue to seek, and I do not say because 'No reservations' is good or bad, is that it is simply not a romantic comedy.New example of misleading media promotion. 'Unreserved' is a dramón in his first 45 minutes, and an unclassifiable genus in the rest. If you want to laugh, or at least smile, this is not that looking.Perhaps we can approach more closely to what this movie is if I apuntillo that its director is Scott Hicks, who ten years ago captivated us with 'Shine' and his co-star isn't Mr. Eckhart, but Abigail Breslin, the girl of 'Little Miss Sunshine' who here has lost a few pounds, the truth. Also, we have a remake of 'Bella Martha', German film of 2001, and that seems to be (I have not seen) has suffered a renewed worthy of Hollywood, IE: doesn't look like anything.I must admit that I am very frequent to see romantic comedies, and 'Serendipity' is one of the best I've seen in years, but in 'No reservations' I had a good part of the footage waiting for the comedy began, and in the end I gave up: despite a couple of very captivating scenes, the rest is basically depressing. Kate (Zeta-Jones) is a chef in a restaurant in New York, addicted to his work and perfectionist in their dishes. When the trip that his sister and his niece to the City turns into tragedy should take charge of Zoe (Breslin), and adjust their care with their work, rather complicated when assigned as Assistant to Nick (Eckhart), a chef quite eccentric and radically different from its form see the kitchen.What we had sold so far in trailers and television spots was the relationship between Zeta-Jones and Eckhart perfect, and a kind of history to the 'first rivals-after lovers'. Well, I'm not saying it's not part of the film, but certainly it occupies at most half an hour and its development is not only predictable, but that its protagonists become authentic slug. Now, when we discovered that this is a family drama and change the chip, everything is somewhat better.I will not cheat, and situations live characters are the mandatory when there is a girl orphaned and one boyfriend more than sympathetic, but what makes it special and avoids to be an acrid product are two of his actors.Performances by Abigail Breslin and Aaron Eckhart again be outstanding. Both earn more and more sympathy. You can have next to such I mujo (Jesus said is of fish without facial gesture) as Catherine Zeta-Jones make best, but it is inevitable that the two eat Mrs. Douglas, who seems lost in the screenplay and signed a performance worthy of a cheap telefilm. Patricia Clarkson, as head of the protagonist, has only scenes, which is why I am going to avoid the waste of a very charismatic actress.With both dish to the novelle cuisine and presentation worthy of Ferrán Adrià, 'Unreserved' is me has antojado more as a 'take away', where you consume food without distinguishing the ingredients very well, and which in the end strips container knowing that you thou only when there is no more remedy.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1369

Yojimbo

El reino de los cielos

muchocine

A very decent see show but to followers of Scott may be a disappointment, as it is my case.

Ridley Scott (sold in insulting manner as "The director of Gladiator" as if the general public knew not the director of Blade Runner or Alien) has chosen an interesting story with an anachronistically modern treatment and a completely repellent character at the hands of Orlando Bloom. With the excuse that the original installation was 3 hours and 40 minutes and that will come out on dvd next year, Scott has released the version in theaters and feels precisely that there are problems of mounting: too many things in a short time. And worst of all, many nuances of characters that enrich the story for sure that they are in the hour and a half we'll see next year.Except Bloom (its presence gives well on screen and the character, but not his acting ability), the rest of the players are fine. Special mention to Eva Green (have to lavish more on the screens!)Although Scott has the healthy habit of recreating a realistic giant scenarios, some digital maps sing. The music, another element that I expected something outstanding, stays in an anecdote, that the main theme of Gregson Williams "adorns" several sequences, leaving the rest of the movie on incidental issues, some issue with vocals (very good), and the "incomprehensible" inclusion of a theme from the soundtrack of "Hannibal" and another of "the Warrior No. 13 ″ of Jerry Goldsmith." Gives the impression that Scott was not too satisfied with the work of Harry Gregson Williams.En short, a very decent show to see but that for fans of Scott may be a disappointment, as it is my case. It is a film of epic adventures without "chicha or another".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4307

Jaime Martínez

Casino

muchocine

Scorsese directs and runs well. After a lengthy introduction of characters, he hoped a rhythm and frantic Assembly, where the greatest achievement consist not bore to the public despite his extensive footage.

While watching Casino, he could not find Parallels and commonalities with a work by the late Ted Demme. I am referring to the unjustly undervalued, Blow. Someday will analyse Blow, that shocked me a lot your viewing, and still regard her as one of my favorite movies. But let's go back to what we are discussing and replace the game in casinos worldwide by drug trafficking, and have two extremely similar works. Yes, I know that Blow (2001) is the later Casino (1995), but I have not been able to stop find similarities between the two. From the escalation of posts in an illegal organization, until the betrayal of your best friend, through the pu ** of your wife that only cares your money and the situation with the small daughter. Up a musical theme is repeated in both films. Two tapes have found me very similar, with De Niro as Depp, Sharon Stone as Pe Cruz and Joe Pesci as Jordi Mollà. It seems that Casino Scorsese wanted to film he both likes and better given in directing. After two works which away a bit of the context that it was Martin, I am referring to the Cape fear, and especially the age of innocence, Scorsese takes the film to better do. Casino can be understood as a sequel to Goodfellas, but ends up being a rehash excessively long (almost 3 hours duration) full of clichés of the genre where adds nothing new. What good? That Scorsese directs and runs well. And does it so with dignity and as one of the greats. After a lengthy introduction of characters, he hoped a rhythm and frantic Assembly, where the greatest achievement consist not bore to the public (Although everything I have seen over and over again) despite its extensive footage. De Niro is sublime as always, and with such contrapicados that makes you is Martin patent who carries the weight of the film. Sharon Stone is simply amazing as she the truth. And who say Joe Pesci, exceeding (was already difficult) outweigh its role in one of our reintrerpretándose if same as bully without a brain. Just brutal. Bright and luminous photography, get truly convey the lifestyle of Las Vegas, and these enhanced levels of the casino are simply great. Finally, what I liked most has been the final scene where we see to the rhythm of The house of the rising sun by The Animals, the slaughter of some members. It reminded me also a lot at the end of the godfather I, when Al Pacino indirectly running his revenge while he remains at the baptism of his nephew. Too many coincidences right? Despite everything, a work complete and very well directed by Scorsese albeit at medium bellows if compared to Goodfellas, the basic pillar of the next Scorsese filmography to Taxi driver and raging bull. For my taste of course.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2669

Kiko de España

Arma Fatal (Hot Fuzz)

muchocine

In short, one of the best films of the year and probably the best comedy. The wait has been worth.

Already he hold no more. After seeing a handful of times Spaced and Shaun of the dead I discovered that I could not wait until almost October to see Hot Fuzz, so even before the possible press pass (which must go if or especially if it is one of the dandies) I bought the American dvd conveniently subtitled into Spanish. And he started Hot Fuzz. Wright likes the fast as well as the classic, and what begins as a police comedy becomes a film of Agatha Christie without forgetting that they are few, very few, directors / writers which translate as effectively couple problems. If they have 15 years doing well not going to begin to get worse now. And follows the tone of pleasant comedy, with infinite influences all acquired genres and for having. until that becomes Cluedo. And the thing improved because, let us not forget, Edgar Wright & Cia have created one of the most cojonudos Grindhouse trailers fake: Don't. It is clear that with Hot Fuzz had time to spare to prepare it and that means that there is blood in HF. No insulting quantities but which there is is spectacular. Metalengüaje of quality and maybe more like (ratites) with Kiss Kiss Bang Bang than with Shaun of the dead. In short, one of the best films of the year and probably the best comedy. The wait has been worth.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1552

Rafa Ferrer

Bosque de sombras

muchocine

It is a pity that this foreign Garrulos Vs CC with an inconclusive end, where it does not delve into the motivations of others.

Koldo Serra (famous for his short film "The Witch's train") performs here his directorial debut in feature film, with this film, set in the year 1978, in a rural setting, at least be to congratulate on his debut, many others fail (or arriving) to that.A thriller that drinks from many sources, (everyone cites "Straw dogs" and "Deliverance") so the argument and the history is not only overly theatrical, very predictable in some cuts of the same.I quite liked the change of plane, in many of the images where the camera with a lens change moves from a character to another, be a bullshit, but my I liked.On the other hand, lately underway fashion include some well-known actors in films "made in spain" so make the sale to other countries easier and more bearable for the tape, one of the problems with which the Spanish film for distribution.It is a pity, that this Garrulos Aliens Vs CC with a final unfinished, which do not get to delve into the motivations of others, and where we have so little information about the motivations of the characters, one has them invent and Imagine getting something clear of it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/396

Kiko de España

Monster house

muchocine

Forget the Green OGRE so overrated, or endangered animals or wild zoos: Monster House is the best animated movie in years.

You remember when you had twelve years and saw for the first time an amazing gang? Or when you were sixteen and went to the cinema to see lost boys? Well I if I remember, and I remember the sensations I had watching these movies, and what fun that was the film then. That's the word that explains what is Monster House: fun.Animated horror movie macabre enough for acongojar to a small criaturita of the Lord, full of detallazos and, above all, good film, becomes an instant classic from the first viewing.Fortunately, and following the criterion of Amblin (Zemeckis and Spielberg produced, only this time producing well), there is no "stars" in the dub, there are actors, and it is appreciated that also it they have been carried out in the Spanish version. Original voices, to Steve Buscemi, Maggie Gyllenhaal (you know who it is, her character is just), Jason Lee (brief role, but as cool.) (It was also the smug of the Incredibles) or Jon Heder providing his voice to a geek that has little to envy to its Napoleón Dinamita. And and you will see that big is Kathleen Turner doing. well, now what you will see.Seriously, not let pass the opportunity to see a movie of truth, only be animated. Forget the Green OGRE so overrated, or endangered animals or wild zoos: Monster House is the best animated movie in years. It was explained above. A 9.PD: Yeah, the incredible is also a 9, but Aladdin is the best movie of cartoon history!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2467

Bruji

Un engaño de lujo

muchocine

With a couple star of luxury, a coherent plot, and development with its frequent references to mythical titles of the seventh art, "Prix Hors" is, without a doubt, one of the best comedies of the year.

Tunisian Pierre Salvadori amounts to class warfare the ironic fight of sexes popularized Ernst Lubitsch, achieving an accurate ridicule of el universo masculino, inheritance of Hawks. Powerful reasons which require repair in this fresh comedy French, evocative of mythic American cinema titles, and driven by a couple protagonist of exception.The difference between a tribute and a plagiarism is, fundamentally, managers who practice the first, responsible, explicitly recreate situations reminiscent of the past. They are these films winks that are much appreciated. The plagiarist, for their part, are engaged in mask ancient scripts following the vanguard Word. There is no doubt that Salvadori, - who, on numerous occasions stated his admiration by master Lubitsch, coming to be regarded as the devil said No as "a perfect film"-, belongs to the Honorable category. His latest work, a delicious comedy with classical dyes, is a good proof of this.Prix hors (something like Carísimo!) is one of those movies that get the attention of the Viewer from the opening credits. The rotating sombrillita belongs to a technique that would be mainly used in American comedies of the 1960s. A claim, however, that was not exclusive to this genre, only have to remember the prodigious home created Saul Bass for Anatomy of a murder (Otto Preminger, 1,959).The romantic comedy formula (paragraph that, improperly, parking is this tape) begins and ends with the chance encounter that occurs between the protagonists. A succeeded in Manhattan in which Cinderella (Gad Elmaleh) soon becomes pumpkin. A new "muñequita of luxury", Pretty modern Woman, that persecutes its Richard Gere.A from this time, the story starts an upward trajectory, looking for the classics, manages to satisfy the movie fan memory. From breakfast at Tiffany's (Blake Edwards, 1,961), with the implicit note of cruelty which contained the story of Truman Capote, until the freshness that only reaches the impossible dreams that we met on holiday in Rome (William Wyler, 1953). We follow a well marked out path in each bend, makes us to marvel. From how to marry A Millionaire (Jean Negulesco, 1,953) until the peculiar "petit déjeuner" served on the Gallic coast, the tribute paid to the beautiful sites of Nice, which both reminds that Delmer Daves made the eternal city in more beyond the Amor.De Fund, the famous battle of sexes it proliferate in the comedies of the 1930s and 1940selevated to class warfare; and the tendency to ridicule the male universe, legacy of Howard Hawks, which reached its maximum expression with the girlfriend Era of 1949. However, the final set far, a lot of what we know by a "film round". It yearns for an effective soundtrack, Councillor of the highlights of the plot; a point of depth in the dialogues, the existence of sharp and witty phrases that feed the script of Benoît Graffin; the creation of new situations that not eternicen initials; and, why not? the inclusion of some memorable frame that had known to exploit the beauty of the lead actress. The scene in testers of clothes, with a close up of the back of a sophisticated black evening gown, clear tribute to Audrey Hepburn, is a good attempt that fails to complete.In any case, with a couple star of luxury, a coherent plot, and development with its frequent references to mythical titles of the seventh art, Prix Hors is, without a doubt, one of the best comedies of the year.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3201

Ana Belén Pacheco

Mr Brooks

muchocine

The penalty is that with Mr Brooks does not give you a remote control in order to pass fast camera that you're not interested at all. And it is that this film is very slow, so much that it seems that Kevin Costner and Demi Moore have been infected and their acts and actions are slow.

I don't like leaving the film thinking that I lost the time. Why I try to fix me at least one good thing of each film to justify viewing but it will cost me with this. The penalty is that with Mr Brooks does not give you a remote control in order to pass fast camera that you're not interested at all. And it is that this film is very slow, so much that it seems that Kevin Costner and Demi Moore have been infected and their acts and actions are slow.Mr Brooks is a brilliant business man with a family that seems perfect. But in his spare time he has a peculiar hobby, is addicted to assassinate couples. Although there was a time in which made it very often seems now ready to quit but events will force to kill at least twice more against their will.There are two things that do not convince me. The first is the director bored with classic and levels unnecessary to making the boring history and decides to go crazy in the final gunfight breaking the aesthetic black and sober himself had been raised to create, the other is Marshall, his own Jiminy cricket as quite unoriginal schizophrenic resource Marshall is much more fun and charismatic than Brooks and in fact much more readyPerhaps they should have opted to change the real character and the fictional and the experiment would be the sea of interesting.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3733

Francisco Bellón

La Búsqueda: El Diario Secreto

muchocine

The search: The secret diary is an entertaining adventure unpretentious film provided that the viewer decides to take her a joke, because seriously judged, you have so many inconsistencies and barbaric acts that would not be where take it.

When we talk about an adventurer, a search of treasures, everyone comes to the memory the figure of a man with a whip and a hat. From this idea, we are now to a Nicolas Cage which seems to always go with a brush, and which is capable of anything without his studied quiff lose consistency.Ben Gates is back, and for all those that this name does not tell them anything, it is the character of the search (fortunately in Disney Spain are aware that the title of the first part here national treasure have liked nothing). This time our hero starts a crusade by returning his family the good name, retrieve his girl, demonstrate the maloso which is the character of Ed Harris, all without disheveled or lose that so supposedly youth air. The best thing you can do to go see the search is minded to take her to messing, in order to thus spend a fun time, rather than the film itself, by the number of atrocities being committed. Only brief appearances of the character of Helen Mirren given to the movie moments of genuine humor, more than all the antics of a Nicolas Cage last thread (regrettable the argument with Diane Kruger at Buckingham Palace). What most annoying of the tape (apart from your script riddled with errors and brabuconerías) is the patriotic exaltation that makes Americans, with some esperpénticos and surreal moments of values, history and spirit. We know that anyone with two fingers of forehead and a vase in the hands can go through the Office of the Queen of England as Peter by his house.The search: The secret diary is an entertaining adventure unpretentious film provided that the viewer decides to take her a joke, because seriously judged, you have so many inconsistencies and barbaric acts that would not be where take it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3914

Ivan Villamel

La Sombra del Cazador

muchocine

A film that is only based on some formal skill by the director and charismatic performance of the three protagonists, being the rest of the story extremely predictable.

American cinema we are accustomed to move extremely Manichean way truthful stories to the big screen, or perhaps it would be more fair to say partially adjusted to reality, to lecture us about alleged values that go beyond any approach morally self-critical and direct their gaze outward, or staying to mean (or sometimes not even that) not condescending look towards their own defects and errors.The new New York Richard Shepard film delves into a story based on an article by Scott K.Anderson on impunity freedom of certain war criminals in the former Yugoslavia, in this case, one of the most dangerous, nicknamed "El Zorro" and which no one seems to know his whereabouts.The plot of the film is precisely the pursuit by some journalists as dangerous character, being a unique opportunity for all of them, but especially for Simon (Richard Gere), reach the absolute glory in a world so as to consume people in the maelstrom of dependence on immediate results. Simon was fired and malvive in wars throughout the world as a mercenary of the information, while his old House, Duck (Terrence Howard), is dragged by complicity and empathy into this new adventure, despite having a job ideal and devoid of all physical risk. To them they were joined by Benjamin (Jesse Eisenberg), the son of a powerful boss of the chain for which working Duck. During his trip to "El Zorro", in which he will discover not only the immediacy of the news is at stake, will live various setbacks and deverán put their lives at risk to achieve such feat.The work of Shepard in the direction slightly dignifies a film whose screenplay, written by the same director, shows an absolute inconsistency, being a history full of topics. The staging is more than correct technically, although without fanfare, but are common throughout the film business resolutions which compensate for that mediocre script, one of those cases where the ability of the creator (although in this case nor goes far beyond the simple technical correction) out front of decent form a product with a more elaborate script, and less given to embellishment or inconsistencies in tone or the development of the action, would have been much more satisfactory. Scared thinking it would have happened if in addition, the director of the function would have been same shabbiness that history developed.It is no coincidence that Shepard previously directed at this "The shadow of the Hunter", a highly recommended film desmitificador as "Matador", where already showed signs of an interesting ability to narrate through the Mise en scène, thing lately it seems that it has disappeared in the vast majority of American directors.Is also remarkable, and a point in its favour, the effective work of the three main actors, both Howard and Eisenberg show complicity possibly worthy of recommendation for all those films that tried and failed it, with moments that demonstrate involvement by both actors, still somewhat expected a player so gifted as Terrence Howard, but being a surprise in the case of Jesse Eisenberg, whose participation anécdotica (one per irrelevant) and another for secondary in two popular films of terror as "The curse" and "The forest" (under the orders of Wes Craven and M.Night Shyamalan respectively), did not presage that ease and reliability that shows us in the role of reporter new inexperienced. The work of Richard Gere, an actor that never excite me, but surprisingly for a server, stands in this new film a character with charisma, who knows how to transmit that disillusioned tone that is assumed to someone that had everything, and no longer has anything I leave to the end. A verdader surprise. The rest of the actors better not speak, because there are cases of the police of the UN name Boris, who is representing repetitive tics of the ignorant and stupid character until exhaustion, or the reserved role actress Diane Kruger, which makes so little credible that look scruffy and lower class requiring role especially demented.In addition, as I said before, the tone Word acquires a particularly relevant meaning in this new film of the Gere Buddhist. There is a worrying contrast, by their intentions and results, gap between what it purports to tell the film and the tone of the story. While the story is dramatic dyes, as it could not be otherwise taking into account that we are talking about the history of a war criminal, furthermore there is background a grandiosely and sarcastic tone that throws negates any intention to strike a balance in the account. Resulting in bad taste many contrasts of a scene to another, or by resorting to the most well-worn scenes of this type of production (such as the meeting in the mountains between the character of Simon and a former colleague). Also, halfway through the film, the film happens to be a history of reporters in pursuit of the news, to revenge perpetrated by Simon, which it does rather than seek a blow that in advance already matched this thriller with elements of the urban western (three men hunting for another, with a reward of 5 million dollars for his head).All this, together with an extremely anticlimactic end and little in keeping with it requiring the story, and not counting the obvious and innocent vision by American cinema of its more obscure organizations, give us as a result a film that is only based on some formal skill by the director and charismatic performance of the three protagoniststhe rest of the extremely predictable and lacking history of any depth or reporting of events and characters, so they required. A film that despite having the gift of the passenger entertainment, involves a certain burden that prevents or even empathize with history. A film failed and therefore a real shame.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/891

Jose Contreras

Ratónpolis

muchocine

The cartoons are most human creations giving us cinema. Roddy, with its luxury Mansion is a perfect example of solitude.

British is not even remotely a boring film. In fact, it is a hilarious movie. But it has a few minutes that stays without bellows. Enough to uncover a detail.Roddy is a spoiled mouse of a wealthy London family. The family goes on vacation and he stays alone. An unexpected visit and an accident led him to give his bones in the sewers of the city. Then he meets Rita, a ratoncita who runs away from a mobster from a Ruby. The mafioso finds and steals Ruby, but Roddy helps you escape and signed a pact with her; She will help you get home and he shall pay for the work. Now comes the downturn in the film. The mafia continues to pursue her because the girl has been a cable that he needs for his evil plans.It is a blunder that small, Mann, and only lasts a few minutes. But it was also avoidable. The movie requires frenzy, so start with a Ruby, but when the bad get the Ruby should give you another excuse to the good continue escaping. Only need a man exit the stage and asked on his knees that we not go because he has another number. The spectators didn't want excuses to be there sitting, viewers thought that we were a few invisible witnesses something important. When the excuses become poor and they tell that they are excuses, viewers discovered that we are there in that uncomfortable seat, discovered that a man is trying to distract us with anything. We can even imagine giving laps in the lead, working extra hours at night to fill the next page of the script. It is then when you look at the clock.The cartoons are most human creations giving us cinema. Roddy, with its luxury Mansion is a perfect example of solitude. It has things but he has no family, is like an isolated millionaire, or equal to the great child of Hugh Grant. All the adventure which has lived serves to make us have a good time with us, but also to raise his life and make a good decision.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1136

Jose Contreras

El truco final (The Prestige)

muchocine

The question may be: will you expect or you do not expect an end like this? If you expected is that you're a very smart guy. And not to mention if you expected from the outset: a genius.

The question may be: will you expect or you do not expect an end like this? If you expected is that you're a very smart guy. And not to mention if you expected from the outset: a genius. Since they stopped publishing the magazine "Kabbalah", people need movies like this to say the list is.I'm not ready, I do not know much of geometry, nor much of history, as the Sam Cooke song, but there are characters that I fall well. The character of Hugh Jackman I liked when I wanted to return the insult. It was interesting when it becomes the only thread that moves his life rivalry. It is then lost.The problem of these directors as brain as Nolan is that they put the history in the service of an idea of a trick. Posts to choose, I prefer the trick of "The illusionist" which is at the service of the story. And I also liked much "the illusionist". The only thing I can say in favour of Nolan is known to tell a complicated story. It is a story in three times that hide a surprise, and however does not lose the Viewer.Michael Caine's character is that of the wise, he guided the Magi and explains what is the prestige. It is the third part of the trick, which returns the magic to the reality, which makes it again appear sanity. The Prestige is the part that lacks to the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3180

Jesus Lens

El Orfanato

muchocine

Go to the cinema as quickly as possible to see already that's some blowout, sure, funny that goes and tells them something about the story. Or, for that matter, the end. Do or make comparisons to other films with that?The orphanage? It can be related.

Heard out of the film: "I thought it was going to be another españolada, but the Jimmy came to see her on Friday and told me that she was p. mother." what a pity having to continue listening to things as well, but the youth of this country still thinks that Spanish Cinema is, in general, sucks. Good, youth, maturity and senescence: with few exceptions (Amenábar), the Spanish renegamos our film until it was necessary that Almodóvar triumph first in France and then in Hollywood before being recognized in Spain. sad Lo of the matter is that when you leave a "The orphanage", rather than speak well of the Spanish film, the thing is shipped with that gloomy "does not seem a Spanish film"Perhaps the phrase that has most contributed to that this long weekend the rooms of cinema that projected the film of Bayonne have been packed and that, at the end of it, to be heard some and shy aplausos.¿Por what, suddenly, the Spanish spectators come en masse and in droves (seems that "The orphanage" figures will be record after their first weekend of exhibition) to see According to what Spanish films?We could start by saying that the genre of horror and suspense is a trump card in favour, but does not guarantee success, as Jaume Balagueró could testify. In this case, that Yes, we are before an exemplary horror film, a film of book, with its scares, repullos, stress, anxiety, fear and several surprises. The fact that the protagonist does not undress, is also an asset in favour of complicity with an audience, especially the women, being tired of our actresses have to leave in full refocile, at least a couple of times for film. In this case, a Belén Rueda at all erotic, in addition to not teach nor Frida of meat, is extraordinary.In addition, actors are understood when speaking. They vocalize instead of mumble phrases loose and disjointed, as if they had a sock inside the mouth or walked half drugged and drunken. And sound effects, impressive. A film, as well as seen, heard, with what that going to the cinema was converted back to a good experience. In addition, see a movie of fear with the full House, cool more.We have a film that seems a film and not a stretched version of the soap opera fashion. A careful design of production, an extraordinary staging and, above all, a solid history of. well, we will not say what. That Yes, advice of friend, go to the cinema as quickly as possible to see already that's some blowout, sure, funny that goes and tells them something about the history. Or, for that matter, the end. Or will they make comparisons to other films with which "The orphanage" can be related.Therefore, go as quickly as possible the film to enjoy terrorizing a great film which, however, not do I know if it will ultimately convince the Academy more elderly hollywodiense sector, whose hearts not pass it very well with this orphanage full of surprises.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1946

Dragon negro

Spiderman 3

muchocine

We have the weaker of the saga film, Raimi, seeing it come that this would be his last delivery, has decided to cook us a plate with too many ingredients and seasoned in excess that one is you just indigestando.

Excessive, this was the word that could not stop repeating me while watching the new installment of the saga of trepamuros, excessive. And it is that Raimi, seeing it come that this would be his last installment of the saga, has decided to cook us a plate with too many ingredients and seasoned in excess to one just indigestando. The large number of plots and characters not allow to taste each one of them as it should be and everything just forming a potingue did not finish digesting very well.Loving conflicts between Peter Parker and Mary Jane just does not work, the evolution of the character of Harry Osborn is more than little credibility, the transformation of Peter Parker in a dark being is ridiculous and the man of sand and its involvement in the life of Parker almost better not talk because he is loaded the essence of the character and virtually all the saga. Somewhat better resolved this aversion of Eddie Brock to Parker, perhaps better conducted plot of all the more believable.One of the weaknesses of the film lies in the humorous part which so well had managed to take the previous installments, these small touches of humor that this time are too child, these dances on the street and the bar scene are Palm. Although the opening scene of j. j. Jameson this pretty well and the emergence of the great Bruce Campbell is one of the best moments of the film. Something that has failed me here is also the music, for example when Peter and Harry fight sounds like a horrible music that does not fit at all with the scene.Surely tell that the spectacular nature of this very successful film, but you want to tell you, found me much better resolved and worked against Octopus fights than any of these, which are solved too quickly, the camera moves at such speed that barely enough time to see much and end up becoming somewhat repetitive, we return to the excessivemany fights but as a whole they know little and are wanting to taste with a little more detail the scenes against the man of sand or poison. And return again to repeat the same pattern of the previous films already, turning again to Mary Jane in victim of the villains and has again be saved already bored and he tired, one expected something more original this time, besides being the worse to straighten the situation of the three.The question I am asking me then is because no film has split in two, each with a different villain and leading the new Green Goblin during these changing and developing everything a little better and not so hasty way, the two way shot simultaneously, gave what they want us to be here for this and more, because it not do then well and not this way that surely not settle many.The result is that we we have the film weaker of the saga, which has more concessions with regard to the merchantability, that the excess of characters is a burden that is not resolved well because it does not give for more. Dress him seen more than one because you will not see so bad that for a future delivery, that is sure that it will, I opted for a different creative team and with a new character's vision, that perhaps for better and perhaps worse, at this point would be appreciated.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1923

Silvia Giner

La fuente de la vida

muchocine

I cried, I have fallen in love, has seduced me. Absolutely great, round film.

The source of life comes to our screens to leave us speechless. A dogma faith that makes movie full of poetry and spirituality with a magical graphic show that will not leave indifferent.As its name suggests, this film uses the myth of "The source of life" or "tree of life" to tell us a sad and real story that mixes passionately with a spiritual plane and another fantastic giving as a result a full of mysticism and pain moraleja.At the end we are what we are and are not yet ready to drink the eternal SAP of the tree of life, our spirit is too poor and our attempts to pursue what we want are powerless. Only the soul can raise us up to the dignity of being touched by the universe and our internal peace, love is one of the tools to achieve that and impotence a barrier in the road that leads to the goal.Wonderful work of Hugh Jackman and in general of all stakeholders (including monkeys). I believe that our beloved Wolverine begins to separate from its viz superhero with enough talent, and is that this man is going to give that talk, by the way, that in 2008 we can enjoy it again in this role that Wolverine will be released. But calm that is Hugh for a while, then slopes as well as it has 6 more movies and a pilot for a TV series, tremendous actor gentlemen.We must certainly thank the film writer and director Darren Aronofsky this wonder that has given us, we did not expect less after the bombing that was "Requiem for a dream" which he directed and wrote. This guy is definitely decanting by experimental and it is certain that your bets are bold and offending. Great talent of Darren, I think that it is demonstrated.I want to highlight "The Fountain" the ability to repeat several times the same without bore it is very complicated, but achieves it. Both the BSO and many sequences are repetitive, but however never are heavy, slow or repetitive, but absolutely delicious and intoxicating. I cried, I have fallen in love, has seduced me. Absolutely great, round film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3116

José A. Peig

Perversidad

muchocine

We apply the maxim that, in cinema, there are films that look good and are really bad, and vice versa. Or films which are an exponent of good cinema, but without being as much as it suggests the appearance.

In line with the title given in the Spanish translation, this classic by Fritz Lang (1945) offers a brilliant exhibition of the perverse nature of the lie, perversion covering different orders of social life, as illustrated by the film: conjugal love (fake love, fake vulnerability, need or selfishness), the idyllic love, friendship and professional work. On the one hand, Christopher Cross, cowardly unhappy that aspires to win the love of a sensual beauty based on lies. On the other hand, the cruel intelligence of Kitty and Johnny, lie by material interests. Finally, all these characters will become victims of the same manipulations network created by themselves. The bonhomie of Chris (Edward g. Robinson) is the starting point used by Lang to narrate a descent into the personal hell of a man who is a victim of his own stupidity. In any case, the best trump card of the film is its consistency and plot solidity, since get express development from absolute benevolence to the final crime without stop being credible. to a certain extent. In addition, the splendid black and white photography transmits suffocation and the sordidness of an oppressive, consistent atmosphere with the psychological stifling of the central character.Every time we there is less doubt that "classic" is not a synonym for "masterpiece". The "classic" implies a tradition against which nothing can do and, certainly, this film has virtues rather than sufficient so that justified his status as model (a classic, after all, is a model from which work towards an optimal film creation). Say that it is a masterpiece, or it reaches the required state of perfection, it is an error.The central character of the story does not stop being a cliché of bonhomie and exaggerated ease to be carried away by the rubber-stamp Sham acts or unfair manipulation. And although it can be argued that such bonhomie corresponds to a profile real (i.e. within its fundamental features containing nuances that give multidimensional nature of genuine humanity) in a film in which the author tries to explain us the emotional and moral decline of a human being still a way too trite to place excessive emphasis on the stereotype of "good person victim of the cruelty of their fellows".On the other side, Joan Bennett and his spouse, also follow a pattern of evil topical and predictable. In fact, precisely because of the excess of clichés, the plot and conclusion of this film are very predictable because it shows that Lang uses the antagonisms to lead to dramatic resolution; who perpetrated the crime are not "bad", but the representative of a caricature of bonhomie (stress about "cartoon"). This, interestingly, could be understood as a virtue, but what it does is put in evidence the pursued theatrical, the simplistic and topical character of a speech that isn't at the height of the depth to which aims, or is it supposed to work. We apply the maxim that, in cinema, there are films that look good and are really bad, and vice versa. Or films which are an exponent of good cinema, but without being as much as it suggests the appearance.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2859

Ramón Balcells

Death Proof

muchocine

Yes, note the involvement with Planet Terror by imitating the B series or as call (the production design and Assembly are excellent), but think that this guy has gone too, towards its own way, and that seems phenomenal.

There are essences, there are customs and talents which one you can catch or rather not. With these two masterpieces titled Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction, Quentin Tarantino left marked a seal that vanished over the following years. However, there were personal habits that not them forgot, although that pure essence of his first two works already not was palpable both. Lost their initial identity in a rational manner. Now, thanks to a buddy Grindhouse, has had the opportunity (or intelligence) back to its beginnings, creating an own history, a brutality sealed in each one of their frames by the unmistakable identity of the director himself. And is that to me, as announced in the first sentence, this guy amazes me, I caught, and therefore Death Proof seems a brilliant film tarantiniano bestieza. If the two Kill Bill were a mere exercise (which not bad) on the martial arts and step on the easternmost revenge, his new job is a realistic portrait of two groups of girls and pass a vision less human, but most masculine, a man obsessed with them. Is that his film is a film dialogue, apparently empty, with depth quasi non-existent, but always with the metaphorical question next hidden behind of are cars, attractive women or guns: in what world we are living? At first sight this question I ask may seem somewhat simple, inclusio too global. But focusing and analyzing this moral background, we can see that in Death Proof life these eight girls quotidiana is treated with sensitivity (not ordinary but realistic) which is later trastocada by the current world of the sick, of the obsessive maniacs that much abound in this not so healthy planet in which we live. The metaphor, therefore it is in these two conflicting worlds (who come to play únicmanete by be outdated), of the female group, crazy and that carpe diem to all time, and that killer male, gross and direct, without just heart and too much intelligence cold. And it is more likely is that you think that this is bullshit, an exaggeration to all gas (never better said). But guys, if you see a film, wherever one as Quentin, of course, can not go with the intention, by seemingly very simple and silly that seems, that this is a simple and funny bullshit. There to see, standing and reasoning. And if you still thinking that what I say is useless, this entertainment is much more than a mere entertainment, we do not like the movies of Quentin Tarantino. Why only think that Death Proof is a simple tribute to those movies B where cars and girls abounded in abundance? Why not stop and think that maybe is something else? Certainly I, and perhaps only I would describe this film as a labour-intensive and very, very worked, made exclusively for the director and some few fans (I do not know, but necessarily myself in them) who see his film as something more than a simple blunder made to laugh (cry of laughter), have fun and leave the film saying "How cool!". And is that in this deep and bloody fun about friendship, you can find numerous winks to the film tarantiniano (their own Manias, say), whether it is the tone of the recommandations of Rosario Dawnson making reference to the already mythical whistles of Kill Bill, the close-ups of plants of female feet, the short sequence converted to black and white (that Yes)(, has no sense whatever his intention) or already very common talks of groups of friends in a bar (still remember this impeccable first sequence of Reservoir Dogs, with a simply perfect extensive dialogue). Here the script was also written by Tarantino, and may be noted that, despite his initial plan very simple view (psycho chases a group of impressive young girls), inside it can extract much, much juice. And this is where play dialogues, covering almost half of the film. In the first story, darker (hence putting it at night), talks among the Group of girls (and some that another boy) are incredibly realistic, quotidianas, though sometimes a bit false and disproportionate, note that point seriously, and so dark, that fear that something happens that (he) keeps them us more strained (and therefore to the public) of that something happens, that the evil Stuntman Mike destroze to pieces sooner or later that the beautiful blonde that comes in the bar (memorable dialogue with it, by the way). Also begins to witness that comic air (perhaps with a more ironic, not as black humor) that little by little you will maintain more tension. At the Summit of the first chapter, is when Tarantino turn on the engine and leaves us all paralyzed, with a head-on collision (I say this literally!) absolutely brutal, with a sequence impeccably mounted and repeated four times from different angles. Then takes to fill that gap between the two stories with a no less sparkling conversation between two policemen of Texas (father and son) that stands out most is where the plane sequence than the absurdity of the content (although you laugh also). Then comes the second (or third, if you want) part of Death Proof, showing that radical change with respect to the characters. Here, already more clear the matter, our protagonist returns to the adventures and you intend to pursue another group of striking funny girls. Is then when, very cleverly, director us approaching the life of these four very different girls but that we fall so well (and what mad are!). Here they are, the obsesas and him, initially with spirits but then defeated, is the victim. Personally, attracts me most this second story, because that with this top in black and white, the supermarket scene, consequent dialogue at the bar (absolutely delicious), the appearance of the talented and excellent Zöe Bell, the purchase of the car and the dazzling and perfect pursuit (with final taconazo included), one can not be left only with words. If the first part was a brutal and no doubt also excellent and striking operands, the second you choose to increase this madness (on both sides, sexually speaking) and make us believe that what we are seeing is a film, pure and simple, of Quentin Tarantino. Recognize that also are the Palm eight which are certainly in a State of grace and a hilarious Kurt Russell and less crazy unrelated phrases as splendid as that drops in the first bar. And not to forget not all musical themes, highlighting the already unforgettable Down in Mexico of The Coasters.Creo that Death Proof, is more than a tribute and the final episode of this Grindhouse, the audacity of Tarantino for coming back to do what he likes, expel this so personal essence and already step make a brief appearance no less memorable. Yes, note the involvement with Planet Terror by imitating the B series or as are called (certainly, the production design and Assembly are excellent, with these changes of tone and the shredded on the screen made on purpose), but I think (or at least I can see) that this guy has gone too, towards their own path, and that seems phenomenal. It is that no one must forget that we we have a Quentin Tarantino film, and that can be seen even with your eyes closed. It is not his best film, but yes it is truly personal, and that is what really matters.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1183

Manel Juanico

El truco final (The Prestige)

muchocine

The development is too confusing, the screenwriter, hoping to solve everything in the end, confuses the viewer through tricks, bad tricks I would say.

The feeling that with which I was at the end of this film is strange. On the one hand he liked, it has very interesting things, address is very good, Christopher Nolan is a great director, despite having led one of the worst movies I've seen in my life, Insomnia. As usual in the current film see the problem of always, the script, that lame too. The development is too confusing, the screenwriter, hoping to solve everything in the end, confuses the viewer through tricks, bad tricks I would say. This confusion is present throughout the film and many now quite uncomfortable because you think that not you you are learning from the film. To be the story told through flashbacks, the confusion is even greater, especially for people who are not accustomed to watch movies party in pieces and displayed after the form in which the writer wants to. I personally felt during many moments of totally lost footage, and the truth, I do not think that a film as it is is well liar to the viewer in this way.In the actions they would like to express my dissatisfaction with Christian Bale, making one of the worst roles of his career, completely out of place, false and lacking in expression, for more INRI dubber of this actor is bad really. As for the rest nothing to highlight correct, Michael Caine does well but personally I do not like that actor. David Bowie little acts but do well although it would like to have seen in original version to see it otherwise.Another thing that I did not like anything is the setting, the recreation of the era, until it wasn't a good bit of the film didn't know if they were in the 1960s, in the early 20th century or in the middle of the 19, therefore more confusion for the Viewer. The dressing rooms not help a lot, pretty bad in this aspect also.There are many things that had been changed from this film, if development not liked, the end has seemed hasty and foolish, and especially the last two seconds could being saved, painful truth. In short, a movie of science fiction which should be taken as such. Surely one of the problems might not expect you watch science fiction movies, I expected something different, I do not know, in my opinion could have been a great movie but he has been frustrated by, or a bad script, or be based on a novel not just work carried to the cinema. During the projection was spinning at the head about how I had developed the film and seemed much better that that in the end they carried out, clear that that is already very personal, but it had that feeling all the time, as thinking that they were wrong by doing so.There is a part that found me totally ridiculous, there is a moment in that, to do a trick, the actor interprets Hugh Jackman looking for a double. Curiously in a short time are in a tavern to a guy that is nailed him, so nailed him portraying if same, a chorrada without any sense. To find a double you can take months, make hundreds of auditions, is not in one day, and less so nailed one to you who you really. IMHO could have taken another actor, someone with a mild resemblance and then cut the same hair, dress him like, or fudge it, whatever before catch the same actor.Disappointing only halfway, at least it is entertaining and has some hits. With a second viewing you can earn. or losing absolutely everything. not be if risk I...

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/182

Alvaro Oliva

La Plaga (Slither)

muchocine

Serie B lovers can enjoy the show proposed by Gunn

Returns the B series of the hand of James Gunn, a scriptwriter who outperformed in the recent dawn of the dead, and which has taken some references for his directorial debut: "The plague". Carpenter, Cronenberg and own Rosemary are a spring that Gunn has absorbed, which monster of the film, to show us this lineup produced, as a good genre film, in a typical village of the deep America, with the typical characters and typical development. In his favour I have to say that it was a little distance, giving a different touch of comical and making the characters, despite not ceasing to be so, have slightly different behaviors. The pattern is clear: a meteorite arrives carrying an extraterrestrial creature that needs a body to be able to propagate. After that a massive Legion of alien slugs will try to seize the village by its inhabitants, among which are the Chief of police and the beautiful protagonist to prevent this from happening. No doubt one of the highlights are its special effects, in mixed digital effects with the prosthetic, reaching an interesting atmosphere.In short, nobody is going to find innovative things in a movie from the start shows us his touch and his homage to the B series, so lovers of this genre can enjoy the show proposed by Gunn.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/356

Jeremy Fox

La joven del agua

muchocine

Great fantasy film that will delight all fans of Shyamalan film and horrorizará to his detractors. They lose it.

This time M. Night Shyamalan presents a tale, a tale with nymphs, fantastic, good and bad animals. And it does so with a fidelity to his style which is commendable. For some time, the director us has been presenting impossible that we had already seen other times but narrated stories with a naturalness and realism that has made them more credible than ever before. He does not have fantastic stories in a fantasy universe, but it tells us fantastic stories perfectly nestled in our real world. Its originality is not in these stories, but in the eyes which projected onto them.Change only requests us that we create and if one is not able to accept its plot premises should not go see their movies, the same way that if one does not accept that a man can fly should not go to see "Superman Returns".As I say, the film is Shyamalan in its purest form and again the framing is a capital importance. But not only that, also what is outside table is chosen very carefully. A typical detail of Shyamalan film is to show us a seemingly bland plane whose greatest mystery is just what we do not see on screen. Nor need the director, supported in a beautiful score by the usual James Newton Howard to his appointment with the emotion and there are a couple of scenes in which isn't hard to drop a tear (or more, if you're an emotional pirate like myself). That Yes, that emotion is compensated with a humor that makes an appearance more often than on other occasions. Possibly this is a formula chosen to help make more palatable the fantasy tone of the tape but it has made me want to see how desenvolvería Shyamalan in the most complicated of the genera.It is not something that is usually mentioned but Shyamalan usually get brilliant interpretations of its actors. Is true that Paul Giamatti has already been a few years wow everyone and don't have to prove anything to anyone, but is a joy to see him carry the weight of the film with a character more complex than expected apparently in the trailers. Both Bryce Dallas Howard, featuring his eyes more than many other actors with a thousand words, as other side offer the best of themselves.Perhaps as negative points I would say that there is eventually resolved with some precipitation and that the script is basically something simpleton. In any case it is not surprising that we are, simply, to a story for reading in bed (but how well cash!). I tell you, certainly not exempt from certain morals that surely not like some but I find it more natural.I don't want to lengthen my comment (attention to the portrait makes the film critics) too so I summarize by saying that it seems to me a great fantasy film that will delight all fans of Shyamalan film and horrorizará to his detractors. They lose it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1421

Ramón Balcells

Bobby

muchocine

Bobby is a magnificent film, without hardly important failures, with an absolutely brilliant ensemble cast and a direction and a script that deserve a big aplasuo. Follow thus, Emilio!

As you have seen, I will film in cinema. Tomorrow, will certainly go to see secret games and Sunday blood diamond. And yesterday, he played Bobby, directed by Emilio Estevez. First of all, to say that we we have a magnificent film, with more than good intentions and a cast, that certainly deserves to receive the name of outstanding.Talk about policy, ladies and gentlemen, is very, very difficult. Or rather: portray the American policy in a cinema screen is incredibly complicated. One can express their views through the absolute patriotism (behold films such as Braveheart, Mel Gibson) either show his more democratic side as, in this case, Emilio Estévez. I, personal and obviously I decanted by the ideals of the second, and that is why I have enjoyed (especially in its final part) with Bobby, the film more mature (and famous), from quite little, great director.Though one, also, can portray their political thoughts focusing only on the events, or by adding to the political plot a series of stories Dakar with a mildly political message each. And Estévez, to finish, the film uses two aspects with their respective importance: the assassination of Robert f. Kennedy and the lives of each one of the people who were in the hotel where he died. And this, the truth is that it only does that improve the quality of the film. Moreover, leaving the traditional structure of a film about a political event, band begins narrating everything that happened the day before, and, to conclude, the assassination, giving way to a totally wonderful Kennedy speech (in off). So we have a screenplay, written by Estévez, quite incredible, written to measure, almost perfect. Perhaps the only judgment that would find you would be that slight downturn in rhythm in the middle of the footage or the bias given to the stories, though perhaps it takes reason counting more some than others, because they are of utmost importance and more profitable.All good film script deserves a good deal. And behold, probably the best deal of the year. Say that each of the performers appearing on Bobby is sublime, but I would especially highlight some: Anthony Hopkins, showing his great interpretive skills, for the umpteenth time, and here, playing the role of a veteran Butler of the hotel, which has experienced many important moments in history; Sharon Stone, leaving crossing legs and absurd sequels, getting into one of the more elaborate roles of the script and offering us a matchless performance; William H. Macy, playing a not very common in his filmography, because he plays the owner of the hotel, with a lover by in the Middle; Christian Slater, oddly enough, is splendid. Although his role is not pleasant, the interpretation which gives us is incredible; Laurence Fishburne, in one of his best roles, giving life to a chef with a personality and morality that exceed normal. Probably the character that I liked most; Freddy Rodriguez, also, in its best performance, full of sensitivity and, at the same time, security; Lindsay Lohan, definitely the best role that has made to date. Its role is charming, brave, risky, full of passion, etc; Helen Hunt as a couple of Martin Sheen. Both are splendid, although their roles do not have too much depth (and this is precisely what you want to achieve the director); and all the others, as I have said, are also splendid, as Demi Moore (although either you believe it), own Emilio Estévez, Elijah Wood, Brian Geraghty and Shia LaBeouf (those who take a joint over), Nick Cannon, Heather Graham or Jacob Vargas (the Mexican who fights with Fishburne in the kitchen).Apart from the impressive script and the outstanding cast, Bobby presents some technical aspects as unbeatable. Since the perfectionist photography, carried out by Michael Barrett, the amazing Assembly, made with precision and rhythmic sense. Also highlights the music of Mark Isham, although I prefer the song Never gonna break my faith (nominated for a Golden Globe).In short, we could say that Bobby is a magnificent film, without just bugs important, with an absolutely brilliant ensemble cast and a direction and a script that deserve a big aplasuo. Follow thus, Emilio!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2748

José A. Peig

Los puentes de Madison

muchocine

Here yes there are humanity and complex decisions, dynamism and a suggestive in several directions narrative, provided that what we circunscribamos in the field of the human being in its debate between vulnerability and the value of being something more than what the inertia of society imposes on us.

This could be the reverse of the previous film commentary. If that was intended to be a complex black film focused on impulsiveness and the irrational, here we have a history of spiritual love with claims of creating complex human actions that lead to a positive message about happiness and life. Let's say there are two ways to evaluate this film. First, and in response to his unmistakable tone of sentimental romance, would be a repletito tale of topics around the relationships that cause an embolism of the irritation you between one see so much escenita romanticona, so many lagrimitas and other hosts in vinegar: Meryl Streep and Eastwood to the beat launching miraditas, with dialogue full of clichés about unsatisfied women and free solitaire that dare not love what by nobility spirit can never be yours. And there throw the couple throughout the film taking beers, preparing the lunch and dinner, walking through the field, cut flowers, brushing the legs and caressing your shoulders. I love you, do not want you to, I either, I also, but do not dare because I have family waiting for me. bla bla bla bla. At the end - tachaaaaaaan - true love it fixes everything, family is the best thing in the world and must strengthen the ties of fraternity grounded in a pure honesty that seeks the happiness of the beloved beings. Been global: a telefilm corny, conservative, Mannerist, false, prescindible.puajj, puajjj, puajjj.No, no, no, baby, here is showing the difference between the "cabezacuadrada" that goes from smartass and objective look of what us is representing. As bit would be a brilliant melodrama that would demonstrate the ideological prejudices of a large sector of public and critics: i.e. those who before any film in which the family or the lofty patriotic values appear with a certain relevance, react off of immature, conservative, giving, Mannerist and other crap. Recently we have seen this with World Trade Center; moms, dads, sons and hermanos.y crucecitas. Anyway, do not confuse the intentional pamphlets, with depictions that show social and human reality as much as appear crosses, military with crosses, lovers that give crosses to remember, families who are reconciled before made pickpockets. Because in such cases - and in the case - what we have is the emotional, spiritual and symbolic reality of a society. Punto y aparte. With "The bridges of madison county" one can feel the infinite mystery of distances in a love affair which, with humility and heartbreaking honesty, breaks (or renewed, reborn, reconciles) a scheme of beliefs and routines: will not mention what schema is broken (or renewing) in the case of Francesca as too obvious, but yes stop the eyes of my spirit in this Bohemian photographer who travels the roads with pulse free and uprootedTherefore the immensity of this character forged most of the mystery and he is the true soul of history. Who originally wanted - to half unconsciousness - presenting himself as a loner invulnerable not needing a home and a family to escape from fear, will finally recognize his own trap, her fear, her inadvertent falsehood that suppresses the desire to possess, to recognize the true love that is deserved. That love with detachment, that confidence from loneliness and bonhomie. What is born and dies where they end and begin the dirt roads that lead to the bridge of the encounter eternal, of love that will always be a new chance, even in the distance that separates a dreamer locked up in his role as housewife and the prisoner of their uprooting hermit. It is throbbing infinity of possibilities afforded by the love that fills all the space between each of the Poles, gives a flavour of importance to life. Here yes there are humanity and complex decisions, dynamism and a suggestive in several directions narrative, provided that what we circunscribamos in the field of the human being in his debate between vulnerability and the value more than what the inertia of society marks and imposes on us.Sensitive and honest love story in a flawless film in its first part: the development of the nascent spiritual link that cometh between the two protagonists is anthology. Then pass more topical, although understandable passages, and the narration loses something of bellows, but the last of all narrated consequences have a stunning resolution in the last section, waste of humanity and feelings and the image that best expresses the core of the conflict and the love: that Clint Eastwood in the rain, lanky, vulnerable and strong, which offers his last look and his last smile of understanding and hope, and the cross hanging from the rear-view mirror that drew the last chance Francesca, whose tears seem to want to compete with rain. That's sensitivity and lyricism without vain pretensions that choke the honest course of history.Here there are also dads, moms, sons, brothers and patriotic values. In the end, the family is reinforced and cohesive, but under a bath of spirituality, hard at the crossroads between alternatives of enjoyment for life, by nearby humans and that in the distance give us the true life. That - in this case - it is not conservative nor simplistic pamphleteering, is a real humanity and a beautiful film craft.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3179

Kiko de España

Rec

muchocine

The best Spanish horror movie in a long time. Live fear. The perfect mix between (spoiler!) The project of the Witch of Blair and 28 days later.

REC scares. Narrates a day's work in while you sleep (disturbing title for a show), show TV presents Angela Spain direct style and on this occasion it approaches the fire brigade of Barcelona, with whom will spend a night of guard accompanied by Paul and your camera principal witness to say the absolute protagonist, that camera and terror are live this history Portas.Entry the night received a call to attend the fall of an elderly woman, but what awaits there is fucking hell unleashed.Of course the film bears resemblance to the project of the witch, but only of the perspective. In that movie the characters know that walking involved and here Angela expected as much a pet rescue. Balagueró and Plaza join forces to create with style, great claw and total credibility.And like the witch project that has a climax a-T - E-R-R-A-D-O-RAplausos at the end and a hilarious then press conference also with applause.I applauded.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4302

Jaime Martínez

Inland empire

muchocine

Abstain-loving people of classicism and the basic narrative approach, knot and outcome; There's nothing of that, the classical is obvious and is destroyed, giving way to the new concepts of modern cinema.

First of all, may I begin my particular vision of Inland Empire with a few words of its director, David Lynch, when searching for funding to finish filming his last work: I told them two things, I'm shooting on digital video and I do not know what I'm doing.With two balls Lynch; more impossible sincerity. And not content with that, ended his argument by saying: never saw a whole. I only saw holes. A lot of them. But that I was not concerned. It happened me an idea for a scene and then filming her. I occurred another, and her filming. He didn't even know how could relate each other. Is true that after Mulholland Drive, expect much again from the Sr.Lynch; and as always happens in these cases, expected just disappointing. Inland Empire has a undeniable visual, harrowing, dark and sinister power. It is a visual spectacle unmitigated, seasoned with a touch of mystery and despair so your mind retuerza and try to get a more or less logical explanation of what is happening. But on the contrary happened with Mulholland Drive, this explanation fails never, or at least I didn't the see. But I've already discussed above in Mulholland Drive, i.e. the universe Lynch and Lynch is not Michael Bay, so they abandon all hope of matching in the work. If with Mulholland Drive, Lynch laid the foundations of the new era of postmodern cinema, breaking all the canons of narrative structure up date you, with Inland Empire has taken one further step, it has spawned a new cinema, has elevated his original idea to the maximum power. It has done what they wanted and as wanted. And he has wanted to do some extensive three-hour, spread over an hour of more or less logic and two hours of disjointed scenes (in) communicated through doors that open us step to parallel realities, to changes in temporary space where mixed us the yesterday, today and tomorrow. Film inside the film, that is what has been proposed but altering the concept of reality and mixing it to infinity. Laura Dern, the basic pillar and character envelope behind the film is supernatural, adapting to every scene perfectly, and closing an interpretation of how complex and credible. Just great. It is technically perfect. With an excellent digital image, with the virtues and shortcomings that this entails, gives us a dirty and dark, grainy texture and artificial image photography, but as well is in the film. Thanks to the digital Lynch allows to play with the camera to suit, deform and adapt the image of thousand forms. The most striking in Lynch is the visual power of its images, capable of loading of concern, mystery and even fear oppressive and distressing spaces. During the viewing, we have hundreds of first, finest levels where we will see pores, stains and any type of damage on the skin of the actors. A montage of lights, where they emphasize the blue and Red (is Lynch) generating a sense of disquieting proximity with the protagonist. In short, exceptional postmodern film from Lynch that breaks with all and like more unconditional fans. Abstain-loving people of classicism and the basic narrative approach, knot and outcome; There's nothing of that, the classical is obvious and is destroyed, giving way to the new concepts of modern cinema. Rest you two points from Mulholland Drive by its excessive length and have not understood the message I wanted to convey Lynch; 100 % Although I have very clear that he himself knows, and not be laughing right now me and all his fans. Still, bravo David.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2184

Silvia Giner

Yo soy la juani

muchocine

Many relied not on his perverse and fornicadora mind was capable of representing the youth of the suburbs with such success that it could be entertaining and credible, but the truth is, as has done it.

When Bigas Luna submitted its draft "Yo soy la Juani" there was more than one to endure the laughter. But I knew that Bigas us would not leave indifferent and is we like it or not, is one of the greats. Many relied not on his perverse and fornicadora mind was capable of representing the youth of the suburbs with such success that it could be entertaining and credible, but the truth is, as has done it.This film you may like or not (there is a whiff to auteur, but of course if not was this would be a clear American taquillazo) but the truth is that the movie is unique, targeted and very very pampered.Best of all is logically Verónica Ehegui, discovery of the filmmaker whose fame discover new full of claw and talented actresses. Veronica will be if leave it, a great actress.Equally commendable is the interpretation of Dani Martín (the canto del Loco) and is this guy without being an actor, the truth is that it is better than many players in the same profile had been, congratulations Dani.A my is a movie that I liked, as it does not, meet many requirements to make it interesting. First bet for novice actors, more than 95% of the shit Spanish directors do not have the cojones to do second, is a topical issue (do though bland clear?) and third makes it adapting their art in the service of the script, which many do not respect, believing very great and then spoil the movie. Ay! I forget a fourth point, perfectly portrays the reality of many morons (including myself of course) marching to the capital to "artists", I thank God that fled the celebrity and I have not found in those cases in which found the Juani but the truth is that is how it isWhen you start?There to congratulate the "Yo Soy la Juani" creative because (as they say in my land "of the pelleja") he has gone out with all the Look & Feel of the project. Sobresaliente.Lo I'm going to claim of this film is that the end is absolutely decadent, absurd, empty and stupid. Not liked at all and I think that he is loaded all the good things I mentioned earlier.I'm the Juani and it is on sale on DVD.Do to Bigas Luna, ask apologies for not accepting this role, but well I never liked for my? and on the other hand to encourage you to continue discovering people and giving them opportunities because if he does not he, Oh my God, Oh my God take us confesados.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2322

Florinda Chic

Last Days

muchocine

This feeling of a movie I like a posteriori know it is strange, but I do that recommend it. Although patience, armed with eight hours of sleep of rigor and the lemon between teeth mentioned.

Candy and Tideland, films on Billboard with drug addicts from through, joins from Friday Last Days. Gus Van Sant makes a film in which a depressed rock singer wanders its unwillingness to live and his distaste a rickety House. An effort for the viewer that should purchased with the entry a lemon to suck during viewing and avoid the cabezada their images and zero action produce.Really when I came out to see Michael Pitt as Kurt Cobain in the days leading up to his death I wanted to recreate Elephant with the filmmaker and his team. However, rested the film because I now like, seems to me that as I've seen a few times in the film it portrays what is vital passivity of an addict and its surroundings.The character of Pitt - that at no time the tape you referred as the singer of Nirvana - a huge pity and it is easy to empathize with him in spite of the obvious distance between him and the rest of mortals. Do wanders, wild…… barely pronounced Word and her? friends? less that they take advantage of him and him depart from a kick when they see him on the floor.This feeling of a movie I like a posteriori know it is strange, but I do that recommend it. Although patience, armed with eight hours of sleep of rigor and the lemon between teeth mentioned. Gus has taken it to be calmly and scripts run with the same Cadence than if the whole team would become tranquimazin.Mr Van Sant has put part of his experience when he became a celebrity among his friends, following the success of Drugstore Cowboy and My own private Idaho - two peliculones. As Cobain bought a house in which is acoplaban all. Jope and this has happened to me and I'm not a star, so in the next, nothing of sofa bed.Special attention to the soundtrack with a song written for the occasion by the blond ephebe protagonist: Death to birth. Also features the track Venus in furs of The Velvet Underground.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1094

Rafa Marin

Banderas de nuestros padres

muchocine

Despite some puzzling initial point and some blow with the flash forwards and flashbacks that are something boring, the film is gaining strength and has a masterful last third.

Him does not fail the pulse to the old Clint, but perhaps we are spoiled and we ask that each film is overcome himself. After a brilliant acting career where he was happily accused of reactionary and quasi-fascist, and a directorial career which already promised interesting works in his first chills at night, the old and wise Eastwood is unanimously accepted as the last great classic live enjoying, despite its already advanced age, the privilege to continue leading and directing very well. However, in this film have won him the hand three factors: first, the aesthetics of the war, how the war was filmed and how color war, which has an inescapable debt, as I imagine her will in the future all war films, with the marvelous opening sequence of saving private Ryan by Steven Spielbergproducer of this flags of our fathers, and, it seems, the director who was going to bring it to fruition in the first instance. The second factor is that the structure narrative, jumps in time and space, the desire to do almost documentary film (and there is no more to see actual photographs of the capture of Iwo Jima and the amazing resemblance of actors with the soldiers of truth that interpret, and MIME of the Mise en scène, from the color of the Earth to the details of bandages)(, misconception, even dogs) almost could have given more court and best narrative expressiveness in a television miniseries, as we saw, and we saw very well, in Band of Brothers. The third factor is that, like good film of war, the characters are confused, tries all stained and dirty and injured, all almost adolescent and the script to make a tribute to the six soldiers who raised the historical flag, twice, and only you can do it with three of them, the survivors, at the end only show some interest in the figure of the Indian soldier Ira Hayesthat had already been the subject of a biopic starring Tony Curtis, the sixth hero, none other than in 1961. That the performance of any of the three central characters is outstanding remains enough merits to the film. However, despite some puzzling initial point and some blow with the flash forwards and flashbacks that are something boring, the film is gaining strength and has a masterful last third. Eastwood spared no scenes of hardness, but not on the battlefield (do will be we all too accustomed to the gore?), but in scenes of everyday life: the family of the true soldier hoisted the flag and is ignored in perpetuity in the photo and the tributes; the encounter with another mother and crying of the Indian in her arms; latent racism (at that time the Indians even had the right to vote) and the alcohol as a remedy; and, above all, once finished the war, return to the mediocrity of life for some characters that never were heroes and have to suffer in meat ignorance and alienation. As already without forgiveness, neither the press nor the politicians go too well standing in the eyes of Eastwood. As part of a diptych which will be complemented in a few months with letters from Iwo Jima, shot in Japanese and from Japanese side, is curious here barely see the enemy, always hidden in bunkers, committed suicide in the caves or attacking at night. Perhaps you have to wait to see how the old Clint rounds out his vision of this fierce battle of history, and his version of the other no-héroes, but human beings at the end and all, who fought for the flags of other parents.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1292

JohnTrent

Apocalypto

muchocine

Apocalypto is a remarkable film that not outstanding. Not excited, but it works perfectly. It has one effective mechanism, which is none other than the of any machine with the pieces well incorporated.

Mel Gibson, as a person, is quite incomprehensible. He is a man determined to be the worst: misogynist, racist, religious conservative ultra or homofogo are some things visible in his personality or, at least, in some of his interviews or acts in public being exposed by their inadequate words. Now, if we enter to evaluate Gibson as a filmmaker, film director, things change considerably. And it is that this tipejo is, in fact, one of the best directors that we have at present, in addition to an author like the top of a pine of the few remaining today in American commercial cinema. Possibly, next to the great but hated by many M.Night Shyamalan, one of the few hopes that we have to think than film, away from remakes, sequels and prequels you, you can bring movies involving an artistic risk, a surprising creativity and moments of cinema in capital letters without having to pull the wrong assumed pedantry of other better considered (1).It all started with a short film entitled "The man without a face", of which I remember little. It was only later with a masterpiece called "Braveheart" when it began to be taken seriously as a director, beyond his facet of grossing star. The real boom came with "The passion of Christ", a film which garnered criticism many-colored but that swept around the world making it in a real social phenomenon. Apart from her commercial success, this film already left us see its Director to a guy with clear ideas about their film, marked violence and passion, as well as a dazzling visual style that leave no one indifferent. Gibson became author and gave us another masterpiece home with prejudice by many.Now, with "Apocalypto" is confirmed as the author definitely as a differentiating label marked by a particular vision of cinema and the world (2).Note that Mel Gibson likes to talk about the human suffering through torture (3) and, if "the passion of Christ" this suffering was the basis for all the footage, in "Apocalypto" not far behind. Death, in the form of Wild Hunt, greets us from the first minute of film. It is here when we see a group of Maya, among them the protagonist, pursue an animal by the jungle to hunt him. Act later, one of them eats his testicles guided by a joke of his companions, to ensure that, in this way, you can overcome their sexual problems.Shortly after entering scene the villains of the story or, at least, the more savage and ruthless people of the history. Its intention is none other than killing the village of the protagonist and the few survivors remaining take them to their village to exterminate them through a ritual in which give their hearts to one God (which is none other than the Sun) to thus quench your thirst. Quickly, and without much more, the film will become a spectacle of action that has nothing to envy to mythical as "Rambo" or "Predator" tapes. One violent hunting the man who will bring some time spectacular and disarmingly made in the best traditions of the genre. All with a compact and (almost) perfect rhythm. It is true that, between the intentions of its director, not this tell us one hundred by hundred and a historical film, although don't forget details of all kinds, even though some are of dubious credibility. Therefore, which Gibson intended, especially since the second half of the story, is to offer us an epic story of action and adventure. And in this, is not wrong at all. "Apocalypto" provokes the viewer with its gore unleashed and without complexes, with its dazzling landscapes and his photography, occasionally, master. Giddy for their concept of the cine-espectáculo with a touch of true author so recognizable and surprised by the characterization of the characters work, careful selection of casting and the risk assumed from his own pocket to invest an amount close to $ 50 million (some say more) to carry out a talkie in the Mayan language and with unknown actors tomostly dealt with true native. In the end, "Apocalypto" balance with around 50 million dollars at the box office of United States and seems to be one even greater interest in Europe, where he began to give that talk by his violence and provocation, as was the case with "The passion of Christ", although on a lesser scale. "And this, while not spectacular, are expected figures, or even more, for a film that involves both risk and that we are discussing but that, as often happens with good cinema of author, knows how to sell through the name of your manager, which is already reason for visit to the cinema for many fans or, in any case, people wanting to check where can get with each new film.""Apocalypto" is a remarkable film that not outstanding. Not excited, but it works perfectly. It has one effective mechanism, which is none other than the of any machine with the pieces well incorporated. Come on, you have to work without problems. And is that watching movies like this, one you assail doubts about how certain levels, can shoot about how someone can create an atmosphere so hyper realistic and credible on a cavilación so difficult and controversial. In the end, this is the film of a director who knows what is hands and which camera does shake the pulse. That is why we can see in "Apocalypto" great moments of cinema without the pretentious games or falling into absurd that hamper the pace. Gibson is going to the grain and doesn't let us escape until they have spent two hours. And, returning to M.Night Shyamalan, it's two of the few directors who can be found at present, within the commercial film, that have the gift of shoot and write with innate ease, with a conspicuous devotion to cinema and what each level means. Ultimately, two directors that go hand in hand, in their respective styles, to create film quality without cumbersome lands that bathing the screen of tedium, who know how to combine the rhythm with the leisurely tone them without leaving the attempt frog, and who understand that, like other arts cinema, needs a heart when we want to do something really comes and impact to the audience. Another thing is the answer that many give them.(1) What can someone explain me why we applaud everything he does, for example, Christopher Nolan, go no further "The final trick", when the huge difference of quality and work between that film and "Apocalypto" or "The passion of the Christ" is obvious? Agreement, is matter of taste. Even so, it shows the work of a creator, someone really aware with what makes and his way to tell. I, as much as I try, can't see these virtues in the flat and empty Nolan.(2) For Mel Gibson, the world seems to be a hard and full of evil place. The violence comes from religion, of the mandates of the people unleashed in madness at the mercy of a few supposed superiors, whether worldly or supernatural. That is why "Apocalypto" continues to offer us a vision of the world that not too far from the current reality.(3) In "The man without a face" torture interior and exterior of a man destroyed by his horrible face Serbia to articulate surface fears of humans in the form of torture, one of the primary, our own; In "Braveheart" William Wallace ended up being tortured to death by fighting against the tyranny of those supposedly superior beings who before spoke; "The passion of Christ" made up the perfect explanation in images of torture par excellence of the story: that of Christ for humanity.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4348

Moebius

Por un puñado de dólares

muchocine

After a resounding success in Italy the film succeeded throughout Europe. A lawsuit by Kurosawa stalled its release in North America. Clint Eastwood returned to the sets of Rawhide without knowing it for much of the world was already a star of Westerns.

In 1964 Clint Eastwood co-starred with Eric Fleming series Rawhide, which chronicled the adventures of two cowboys and their transport of cattle from one place to another. For years had tried good luck in the film, looking for that great role given to know. He had worked on films of the talking Mule Francis, in serie B as Tarantula films or inexpensive westerns as Ambush at Cimarron Pass, classified by the actor himself as "the worst of his career". Although Rawhide gave him enough money to keep together with his wife, artistically the inexperienced and impulsive Rowdy Yates role not him yielded nothing. Eastwood took notice how to do different managers who were going through it, although obviously the moment that it became after the camera still was far in the shooting of the series. By the time I had to search for the way out of the vicious circle of television. Surely he would have never imagined that that opportunity was waiting on the other side of the Atlantic, in old Europe, where a renewed Westerns and orondo Italian director were about to change life.The birth of the subgenre known as spaghetti western occurred before that director Sergio Leone was even raised to shoot a film of this genre. For when the Italian decided to shoot a story set in the old American West, around 25 western films had been shot in Italy by directors and Italian teams (including the father of the own Leone, Vincenzo). But the work of Leone marked a turning point: even with few resources, the director managed to compose a magnificent piece that site of the majority of films above, not only by having higher quality, but by an enjoy a treatment different, very personal, close to the "westerns" mature as Solo at the danger.Since the 1950s the co-productions between Italy, Spain and Germany were very frequent. The main reason for such collaboration was to reduce costs and ease to take economic risks of any film that was carried out. One method was renewed when Samuel Bronston landed in Spain to a series of diverse gender megaproducciones. Bronston brought money and American equipment, built studios, sets, and, even more important, the Hollywood method carried Spain. A whole series of technicians and filmmakers were formed under the tutelage of Bronston. And this was a hugely important breeding ground for the step that would give Leone in his career. Spain was the perfect place to shoot a western: had the landscapes, the media and technicians. And entire villages dedicated to the film industry. At the beginning of the 1960s the scenery was prepared. Only needed a story.The western, as myth, had been abandoned by Americans themselves. The genre remained, but in 1963 it represented 9 per cent of the total number of productions in Hollywood. Each time was less profitable, and the big studios producers preferred other types of stories. The creators of the invention had left him to his fate. The witness should be picked up by others. Artists and filmmakers from other countries, who had grown up watching westerns in film, and who had drunk of the sources of John Ford and the rest of major Hollywood directors. And the history that should serve as inspiration for the start of the trilogy of the dollar came from the most unexpected place: the far East.Director of Yojimbo (mercenary), Akira Kurosawa Japanese, acknowledged the influence that the western had in shooting the film. Among other factors and reasons, Kurosawa appropriated the imagery of the far west of the Hollywood of the cowboys and the lone heroes myth, and sifted it to adapt it to the conscious and the history of the Japan. He adapted a detective novel (Red Harvest by Dashiell Hammett), her moved to the medieval Japan and her shot in the western manner, as if it words– deep roots with Samurai instead of with gunmen.Sergio Leone found in the mercenary history that you were looking for. While he saw in the film he decided to adapt the story and turn it into a western. Thus closed the circle: a history of gangsters becomes a story of Samurai to end up being a story of gunmen in the far West. The myth was revisionado over and over again. Leone said always to be "translated" into Italian, rather than simply copy the Kurosawa film. However, after the premiere, Kurosawa (quite rightly) sued Leone by have copied his film without acquiring any right or have mediated some conversation. The courts gave him the reason, and Kurosawa and his partners saw a 15% of the total of the collection of the film and the exclusive rights of the film in Taiwan, Japan and Corea.El main character of the film, the stranger, the man with no name, it should be played by an American. Leone had in mind Henry Fonda as his outsider: expected a surprise effect that would cause sensation. However, the agent of Fonda is not even deigned teach the script that Leone had sent him. Leone sought then to James Coburn, but was too expensive. Later, Charles Bronson turned down the role, stating that the script was "simply the worst thing I have ever read". However, later said: "what then I did not understand is that the script was that mattered." "It was the way in which he was set to direct what would be the difference". Leone finally found their man in one a young promise "empty eyes" appeared that it could fit into the role. His name was Clint Eastwood. Apparently, Leone seemed not very convinced, but the possibility of the cache of the actor to rise in the coming months convinced the producers that Eastwood should be the man. Tonino Valerii, Assistant director of Leone, said: "Not remember Leone said never really 'yes' to Clint Eastwood". Instead, Eastwood, interested in the script, if accepted the offer of Leone. It also contributed the desire for his wife to spend a holiday in Spain and Italia.Eastwood is not only devoted to portraying the stranger, also helped to design it. He bought the black pants in a shop of Hollywood Boulevard. The hat did in Santa Monica, and apparently his famous poncho acquired it in Spain. Also his idea was the constantly having a cigar in his mouth. Also said its characteristic look and those entornados eyes were product of the Sun and the lights of high voltage is used for lighting.Leone, who had already worked on Spain earlier at the beginning of his career, made his Westerns Almeria (and also the mountains of Madrid and Burgos). Many of the sites for his scenes already knew of his previous visits. Others arose by chance while traveling, and others emerged after the search for locations. But the truth is that the dollar trilogy and Spain were inextricably linked.The last characteristic element of the trilogy in discord was the music. Ennio Morricone, who had been a classmate of Leone, was not the first choice of director. Sergio Leone was not impressed by the earlier work of Morricone and met the composer after being pressured by the producers. However, he decided to give it a try.Under the direction of Italian Eastwood began developing thus interpret that it has become their particular label: scantiness of words, hissing voice, tone off, a glacial look which over the years has become really expressive and a sly smile became a rogue that although he killed in the back we fell sympathetic to his ruthless gunslinger. With Leone he also learned that a low budget may be enough to make a great movie, and there was another film out of Hollywood where you could kill someone on the same plane and where a director could really make his movie.Once the Eastwood filming he returned to North America believing that he had rolled an Italian western third of which he would not hear talk and who had reported an amount of acceptable money and holidays in Europe for his wife. Meanwhile, in Italy, changed the name of Il Magnifico Straniero to the final for a fistful of dollars, while the actor was warned of this (so that when the first reviews were published in the United States believed that this was another film). After a resounding success in Italy the film succeeded throughout Europe. A lawsuit by Kurosawa stalled its release in North America. Clint Eastwood returned to the sets of Rawhide without knowing it for much of the world was already a star of Westerns.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1090

Oscar Cantero

Candida

muchocine

Candida has a natural talent and charisma wishing many stars endiosadas and drunk of a glory for himself more media than film. And Guillermo Fesser has been able to exploit that quality. Go to if did it.

Almost ten years ago now, I had the opportunity to meet personally to the components of the duo rubber foam, on the occasion of the presentation of a book on internet for clumsy when this network was incipient in Spain. Since childhood he had followed them and I had always liked his humor of cut surreal, full of wit and sarcasm, and so different from the my nearest usually by my status as proud Cadiz that exercises such.El Milagro de P. Tinto seemed like a huge breath of fresh air, by their diverse characters, bizarre scenarios and revolutionary approach. This combination of factors will confer a very special nature. The case of Candida is different. Here, Candida is the Sun around which revolves the entire film. This good woman, whose character has her own real name, dreams about having a small house in America, and thanks to their efforts of Celestite, manages to reach him. Wit based on the simplicity of the dialogues, bright at the same time that intelligible for everyone is the main feature of this film. Observe the way of function of this lady is prevalent in interest on any other aspect of the film. Single achieved what many big stars fail, she is fill the screen and make the rest of the cast and the purely cinematic issues languidezcan. And is that although it may seem exaggerated, Fesser defined perfectly to this woman, without academic training, when he said that having access to appropriate studies, surely today I would be sitting on a bench of Congress maybe isn't a masterpiece, but the pleasure of seeing a simple and endearing lady as Candida, offset by more than the almost five dollars that today I have stuck by the entrance.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1442

Tito Chinchan

La gran evasión

muchocine

Essential film war semi, which shows greater leakage of prisoners which took place during the second world war. Dynamic, intriguing, tense, emotional, personal, with thousands of small stories that have made it one of the best films of all time.

If I have not seen this movie 20 times I have not seen any time, and this has been the first that I've finally seen the opening scene. Not be why, but that entry into the concentration camp had never passed through my retina. Also this time I I have heard that it is based on a real event, with which the hairs as usual hooks have become hairs as beams of skyscrapers. That wonderful film.The film is about a modern concentration camp during World War II. It fall all military prisoners who have been captured and recaptured many times, i.e., experetos in fugues. According to the philosophy of the Chief in command, they have gotten all the apples rotten in a basket. So the prisoners decide, guided by a natural leader, make more flight that was never made, to achieve that Nazi troops lose time searching for them, instead of fighting on the front.This film is of the few of the second world war which does not show cruelties and horrors of war and concentration camps. Shows a friendly face of the war, with some very innocent nazis who rub the absolute candor. On the other hand, the allies are astute and intelligent mostly, with a great sense of honor and duty. Perhaps too much Candida vision which gives, but certainly a tremendous film. A terrific cast, with a real story that puts the willies and calls the epic, manages to keep the tension for almost three hours, something not easy to do.In short, essential film war semi, which shows greater leakage of prisoners which took place during the second world war. Dynamic, intriguing, tense, emotional, personal, with thousands of small stories that have made it one of the best films of all time.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3372

Tito Chinchan

Cube Zero

muchocine

Prequel "The cube" that explains a bit of what is going one. If you have not seen the first, not be what are you waiting for. If you've seen her and you liked it, see also this, more of the same. And if he didn't like you, becomes long.

We are going with this prequel of the suffocating Cube, that more than one bad night made me pass. In this case speak a sort of prequel, but I say unto you first or are you occurring see rather than the original, as I it out the surprises of the initial. I do not remember too well the two previous installments, but if I have the impression that this and the original are quite better than the mental straw of the hypercube. And that I liked.The film is about a pair of operatives working as watchmen of the large cube, seeing as die that it fall. One of them, the youngest, spends the day questioning elements of their work, while the other does no more than rebuke him. On the other hand, within the large cube, a series of characters trying to survive by opening doors and face the dangers threatening them. Quite suffocating.A film born directly to fatten the ranks of the video store on the corner a priori cannot bring anything good (unless is a porn, of course). But as the above seemed very interesting, because given a chance. This has been given a touch enough gore to ratites, perhaps to wake us up (the beginning is to turn off the DVD and go for a walk). The atmosphere created is just as claustrophobic as always, but double, given that you feel that feeling both prisoners and jailers. And the good thing about this is that you will explain you things. That if you not pass the film removing defects, that if you will not get bored.In short, prequel "The cube" that explains a bit of what is going one. If you have not seen the first, not be what are you waiting for. If you've seen her and you liked it, see also this, more of the same. And if he didn't like you, becomes long.I liked it and angustió me, objective achieved.Besitos.P.D: And how were going to rooms with the door in the ceiling? Thousands of absurd questions such as these will attack him. Arrear a güiscazo to kill neurons, ignore me.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2701

Ramón Balcells

Los 4 Fantásticos y Silver Surfer

muchocine

I have no choice but to not rent, buy or get the first part of the fantastic four. Lucky that this second is minimally entertaining and has some good moments (the rest are truly shameful).

Horrified was when began the film, with such tremendously bad gags and that impossible production design. I must admit that as it progresses the film I've entertained, but also recognize that, in reality, is a real crappy. And therefore what I summarize in 4 points, which are few. And that I have not seen the first, who say that it is peor.1. The characters, however much that Mr. Story we want to try to show, there is not a shred of personality, and sometimes release each phrase which is to burn them, choke them, leave them stone or wish they become invisible. Or the beautiful Jessica Alba, which here seems more a Barbie cute Nancy Callahan in Sin City, get me to decant for one of these fantastic four. And therefore chosen as the best character to Silver Surfer (despite offer us some truly pathetic scenes - not because of him, also must say-), either because it is new or because so many stupid things like everyone else does. And also let it run to the Victor (of Nip Tuck). 2. The script is one of the worst ever written. It has no sense, neither maintains nor grace. Dialogs are simply pathetic, with some of them you get even feel embarrassed. And what is that Chinese wedding? They will be tacky! This story is really of the simplest I have seen in my life, and look that director is named as it is called. 3. The film itself is more flat than a sheet of carpaccio. At times try belong to this type of movies that are interested in the visual and leave to part the content and the moral, and then walks with bullshit like some I can not mention and claiming to be "deep" or dramatic. Decepcionante.4. and finally, I not want to leave it so, so bad, because there is something that it caught my attention: Visual effects. The truth is that nowadays all these sci-fi blockbusters have an incredible technical section, and I guess that thanks to him many of them are saved from being authentic shit (an obvious example would be the film in question).So I have no choice but to not rent, buy or get the first part of the fantastic four. Lucky that this second is minimally entertaining and has some good moments (this is truly shameful), as London or the forest. And wouldn't let me others four points, this time all positive: the first, Doug Jones as Silver Surfer (in reality this surfboard is a tacky, and I apologize to the fans of the character); the second, special effects; the third, the music of John Ottman; and the fourth, which is relatively short.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/98

Tito Chinchan

Casanova

muchocine

A light comedieta for those stupid days

Penalty which has not made this film Pajares, that since then we enfrentariamos to a rejoice and a folleteo and a license from the first frame. And of course, it is that you see the poster and it airs a miss with the back and you think "I tell the missus that we will see this and everybody's happy". And ends you're thinking "ande are topless ladies!". And it is that, apparently, love and nudes are like oil and water for American filmmakers.The film is about Casanova, the most flirtatious of all time (after Pajares, I insist). It begins with him old telling us a little of his life. NA, normal, that if beat in duel with one, if saved in extremis from the gallows, that if trajina to a nun, who was trajina to another, that if to another, that if to another. Poor man, would you dry up the cord. Then the film is twisted and aims towards a love that he has and that rejects him. And that, until the most handsome, cannot resist it.Well, let's see. As I expect little, me has pleased the film. The atmosphere seems very good, with its impossible costumes (in particular is the Duke) and selected and outdated dialogues. He has an air of modernity, because but would be unbearable. But the film itself is not hooked. To begin with, show us old Casanova, so you know that it does not die. Then, as we move forward, we can clearly see how will end matched all remaining points. But since then, can be seen much better than others on the Billboard. In short, a light comedieta for those stupid days.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/297

Jose Contreras

Ella es el chico

muchocine

All the criticism I've read of this film agree that is rubbish, which prevents me from completely say what think of it, i.e., the sensational, entertaining and stimulating that seems

Viola, you can not break me, tells his ex-boyfriend, nobody breaks for football. But Viola thinks that football is a good reason to stop this guy. He is a liar who alone tells him that she plays well and publicly tells him that he can not play as a boy. Viola needs to know a man as it is. And on the other hand she believes that you can play football as well as a man. Viola can get two things when his brother escape from home two weeks and she ranks in the male boarding school. Thanks to his disguise of chico, Viola has access to the Sancta Sanctorum: on the one hand can inform men from within, without having to endure the costume are placed in front of the girls. On the other hand you can train on the men's soccer team.More fun "She is the boy" is to see the girl trying to disguise what is, perhaps because it lays bare an inevitable truth that we're not the same.The comedies of Shakespeare, and this more, are always stories of love that bind. Viola, the protagonist, is the glue of all couples. The handsome, Duke, takes three years sighing for the beauty, but achieves nothing; the beauty, Daphne, has come out with all the boys but remains the same of sad, the ugly girl in the story does not come out with anyone because you have the ugly label. All missing something, and it seems that Viola has a magic wand. Daphne lets you read one of the poems of Sebastian by mistake. In his role as man has an appointment with the ugly and it ceases to be ugly. Seems able to even join their parents. It is a girl if they put it in a convent makes it a matrimonial Agency.All the criticism I've read of this film agree that is rubbish, which prevents me from completely say what think of it, i.e., the sensational, entertaining and stimulating that I think. Sometimes critics are like the nutritionists, priests, doctors, Governments, prohibit you all you like.Francisco Mariner: the comical is limited to the predictable the girl's plight when he has to go to the showers or when her voice betrays. Roberto Piorno: She is the boy is the proptotípica posh teenage, corny and romantic comedy that House as well usually with the tastes of the American public of that age.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4349

Moebius

La muerte tenía un precio

muchocine

The film premiered in large rooms, was expected as a new event, and was a resounding success. It tripled in Italy the most box office film figures.

After the resounding success of for a fistful of dollars, everyone expected a sequel. Pressures on Leone to shoot a new western were becoming greater, although he tried to carry out a different project. As he himself said, they seemed to challenge him, and nobody seemed confident that he could shoot something other than a western. However, others who knew him claim that their refusal to shoot a sequel due to its eternal fear of failure, and that, although in reality yes willing to shoot another film of the same genre, he feared greatly that this time the film does not work. Finally, which apparently led to the sequel was the contract that Leone had signed to be able to move forward with a fistful of dollars. According to this contract, Leone was still filming another film for the same company. However, Leone found a lawyer, Alberto Grimaldi, which offered better conditions for shooting his film. Although it had no history, the director already had a title, Per a few piú dollars, apparently a kind of joke relating to producers who worked on by a fistful of dollars.Meanwhile, Clint Eastwood was still working on the TV series Rawhide, and a fistful of dollars still had not reached the North American cinemas. While Sergio Leone started again several contacts to tell with some of their favorite actors (Henry Fonda, Lee Marvin) to Eastwood was offered $50,000 to that is enfudara of new guns and he wore his old poncho and interpreted to the main Bounty Hunter, known in some versions as Manco. Eastwood agreed. The villain would be played by Gian Maria Volontè, who already had participated in the previous film. After much searching the actor for the second Bounty Hunter, Colonel Mortimer, Leone found in an old photo of a film magazine to its Mortimer. According to Leone, the man in the picture seemed "a Barber of South Italy", but also had "Hawk nose and the eyes of Van Gogh". The name of the actor was Lee Van Cleef.La movie, I had more budget, was also more complex in its approach, with small flashbacks and various nuances, but still had all the ingredients for a fistful of dollars, although in more quantity: the irony of Eastwood, the close-up of eyes, characteristic music of Ennio Morricone, and a rather unusual principle: a plane of a Valley, and off-screen hear different sounds: someone whistling, a cigar that glows, a rifle loaded and shot that knocks down a rider that passes. The death had a price began in impressive form, and featured her first character, the Manco, without even appear on screen: just a whistle and smoking a cigarette so that we know who it is. In the next scene, a Bible will give way to the second Bounty Hunter, Colonel Mortimer.La chemical between Eastwood and Van Cleef it proved effective, and they were memorable both endured their revolvers giving kicking and fighting as two children on the street. Eastwood repeated in its role as the gunman with a little talkative and quick hand three-day beard, although on this occasion was perhaps less cynical, but keep its irony and his primary motivation remains money. The smile of Eastwood rogue had in death had priced its big debut. Also said that the leisurely manner of speaking of Eastwood began to appear in this film, during the sessions of dubbing in Rome. It has pointed out that it was inspired by his Italian dubber, Enrico Maria Salerno. Other sources, such as the former actor, Sondra Locke, claim that it is based on the way of talking about Marilyn Monroe.El film premiered in large rooms, was expected as a new event, and was a resounding success. It tripled in Italy figures of the most box office film, and while the film was sold to abroad, some North American producers who had come to meet with screenwriter Luciano Vincenzone in situ checked the enthusiastic reaction of the public to the film. There and then began to take shape the film that completed the "dollar trilogy". Meanwhile, taking advantage of his stay in Rome, Eastwood took to participate in a film coral before returning to the United States and return to the shooting of Rawhide.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/18

Eugenio

Doom

muchocine

What bad is the nostalgia

Now is when left as a geek to say. I liked a lot!!! Above all, sure, when the camera gets in the foreground as it was the game. Ainss, what memories. The only thing I missed is that it became immortal mode and advanced punching. Although it does in part.Okay, first of all, the movie is bad, very bad. But the nostalgia I can. Especially when it gets in first person, of course. the rest no longer a cocktail of hundreds and hundreds of action films that we have seen on many other occasions, fills the topics of these films (attitudes, components of the Group and similar, topical that I love by the way). If you liked, to give a couple of examples predator and Aliens, the return, this film follows that route (although does not, not even close to the results of those), is a film that I call "bug hunt", there are bugs and kill them. Neither more nor less. The attempt to make one of the most interesting characters to have problems with a woman that are in the scientific complex (no, it is not what you think, it is her sister) continues to be a failed attempt, because, frankly, what is less important in the film is family relations as the protagonists, mola is hunting bugs. and in that sense, if with the exception of the scenes in the foreground (and not to be here excessive, everything must be said), is quite short. Apart from certain situations as the appearance of a scientist do not know very well where does when the complex should be evacuated, but come on. Apart from these small details.Ehmm, vale, for the majority of the readers of this blog would not even mildly interesting, but pussy. the nostalgia. ainss

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1202

Rafa Ferrer

Pequeños grandes héroes

muchocine

A tape as weak and irrelevant, that will make you yawning while you slept 15 hours

Inconsequential infantiloide film that covered in the purest "moralina Disney" trying to add "super-hero" tapes, and is the film recalls, among other a: "The fantastic four", "X-Men", "Sky High" and even "The Incredibles" of Pixar.Es a shame that a few showy decorations have been accompanied by some special effects (more than anything CGI) quite simplistic, on the other hand, the originality of the script falls under its own weight, (or perhaps is that everything is already created), even the ridiculous names of superheroes that form this group ZP (do Tengrá something to do with the film President? hehe).The characters seem to made thinking in merchandising, a sale of dolls, mugs, t-shirts, etc. I'm sorry by Tim Allen, but a type which I fell well, starts result me weary tapes like these, accompanied once more of Spencer Breslin, who seems that it likes to do over and over again the same role; by the way, I discovered Kate Mara that I liked much more than the rest of the casting, a pity that Chevy Chase has returned to the cinema with this film, by the way Courtney Cox is has operated chest?Finally, tape as weak and irrelevant, it will make you yawning while you slept 15 hours.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2957

Rafa Delgado

Nana

muchocine

As a curious addition to the universe of the countdown, there it is. As a completely independent film, fails.

One of the sleeves I enjoy most lately, is 'Nana', and at the end to see his film version in flesh and blood, I can only say that I am disappointed alarmingly.The fact is that this "film", "adaptation" of the fabulous Ai Yazawa manga, has shown me that 'Nana' is only compatible with the universe of the countdown, as to delve into the film to fail miserably. or the universe of 'Nana' or those responsible for the boring and incomplete script of the long before us.Everything is quite mediocrillo: most of the sequences are little more than "anti-cinematográficas" with a totally insipid fixed sequences without music, where the mounting is disastrous, and the word movie looks everywhere. Only a couple of few sequences are saved for this, and are the sequence of the farewell of Ren in the train and the last song of the concert of the Trapnest.El cast is penalty. Not only are fatal characterized, but that casting is pretty inappropriate for an adaptation of a manga where abound men and women seemingly attractive and guapetes in the face. Ren and Shin, among others, NO SON NI DE COÑA Ren and Shin. Nana Osaki that appears is the Coca-Cola Light of evil, and Nobu and Yasu lack completely overflowing personality that enjoyed in the manga. And Junko and Kyosuke? ANDEANDARÁN!The only people that give the paste moderately are Nana Komatsu, Leila, Sachiko and Shôji. Ah! Do not save what nobody is in the performances. All very little College Theater and quite cumbersome, so as a function of cosplayers that little Act.As adaptation, regular. The essence 'Nana' is there, but is very missed and no sense of humor none, as if it has the manga. In addition, is a victim of the newly-invented-for-a-server "syndrome Alatriste": wants to cover taaaantas things (volumes), history is just going from the hands, and quite bundles. That it is good that I am reading the manga, if not I do not think that I have learned much.I came to the same conclusions as to the "live action" of 'Death Note': as a complement curious of the universe of the countdown, there is. As a completely independent film, which is what I appreciate in these cases, fails.And now finally, as the only element remarkable to 100 percent, the soundtrack.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2675

José A. Peig

El ultimátum de Bourne

muchocine

It will be to understand cinema lovers as an art, for those who are tired of old roads and the dramatic visual treatment as not creative, is a hodgepodge of which better flee as he runs away from a plague.

Look at what we have become. The search for Bourne and a trilogy about the origin and identity compressed in a format of action / spy film, ends with this phrase three films to tell almost the same thing three times, with which we have one of the products more blatantly stiffs who have been. When we arrived at the "the end", the joke is so irritating as predictable. In fact, we have one of the worst in the history of film Trilogies.The story itself offers nothing original, and this is particularly striking in the last minutes of a tape that had close the circle with a grade higher or complementary to already exposed in his two preceding, and not return to reiterate the implicit ideas, because what you do is say verbatim what they already knew (what I knew any spectator that has provided a minimum of attention). If the schematic had already mella in the previous installment, here is a ' fundamental problem: all scenes of action - "here you hide and you get here", "you think I'm there but I'm here", etc. - they are exactly the same, the writers always use the same structure to design situations, and the only purpose is the create spectacular scenes depicted with the bombastic pulse of the camera by Paul Greengrasswhich gives rise to a purely dramatic visual impact devoid of authentic sense of narrative; a narrative is set with the pace of new emotional and/or ideological States on the characters, or with the discovery of new data binding to reinterpret the byways or motives underpinning the history. I.e., that each sequence devised establish a progression on the previous.There are many ways to build a narrative, but what we cannot do is confined to a chain of scenes to each one more spectacular and extensive (look at how action sequences, are stretched symptom course that the writers do not know what address the footage), and let the information essential for the last ten minutes. And above, to know what already we knew. Some filmmakers and writers need someone explain to narrate is to synthesize and make progress towards the outcome, not on disperse and outlined.In short, and if what it is looking for a bit of entertainment, the film can satisfy fans of the genre. It will be to understand cinema lovers as an art, for those who are tired of old roads and the dramatic visual treatment as not creative, is a hodgepodge of which better flee as he runs away from a plague.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/241

Caty

Ultravioleta

muchocine

It is not only bad of solemnity in its approach, but that, for the first time in my film buff journey I meet a film that, could not tell exactly his synopsis.

I thought that I had seen everything. He believed that any film, bad that it were, could make me bring Manus again to the cabeza.pero you see, Madam!, I was wrong from part to part. Ultraviolet is not only bad of solemnity in its approach, but that, for the first time in my film buff journey I am with a film that, dear readers, not could tell exactly his synopsis.They say that it is more easy to talk about a bad film of a buena.pero definitely in my case is not so. I must admit that when I left the cinema he was eager to be able to complain about all of it, but as it has happened other times (by jemplo, when I saw "Timeline"), difficult to talk about something that you have not enjoyed in good absoluto.pero, hairs to the sea and here we go.Ultraviolet, in principle and without having seen anything of her, as a brief trailer is another film of these bleak future due to illness, of wars, of pollution. and I am not going to deny that as a general rule they fascinate me, mostly because they know join social critique of why humanity reaches the moment that comes with a quite interesting action point (we have most excellent examples as Matrix)(, Blade Runner, Equilibrium, the Terminator Saga.) but Ultraviolet has overcome all fear when using these elements in an inappropriate way. Normally, when these two elements not marry perfectly (as in the above examples), always we can stay either with the apocalyptic and moralistic argument or with the well posed action entretenida.en film, the argument simply does not exist, and the action is extremely absurd. In teoría(y_digo_en_teoría_porque_en_la_práxis_difiero_totalmente), the story that exposes us to the Distributor is as follows: at the end of the 21st century comes a group of human beings with a genetic mutation created by a virus. As there are more infected people fear of the Government increases and those infected are treated as to marginalized, they were being subjected to gruesome evidence and put in quarantine. The Government has taken the determination to put an end to them, but a woman with a terrible past is determined to prevent it: beautiful and lethal Violet...And now comes the sound JA! that this servant them delivering in the face to those who have drafted this paragraph. Here comes mine. (Attention: contains details reveladores-si is there something to reveal - the "argument") At the end of the 21st century and without apparent reason there is a new disease in the world who does not know or where has left or what. and people will and spreads. Physicians stand with the power to better control the population. Ultraviolet in theory is one of the "infected", a lady that changes color of hair as Jorge Vestrynge of political party, and that seizes the weapon that can kill humans? You'll end up with the hemófagos?(to know), she leaves a child. Children don't know why awakens in her a maternal feeling and aunt insists, against his companions and his enemies on save him?.The child dies. Appears in the middle of all this a few guys who call themselves "Chinois de Sangre" or quienes(para_qué_explicar_lo,_¿verdad,_señores_guionistas?) we know a bad very bad in the end is that it is also hemófago and the typical hero marginalized semi in love with the character of the Jovovich. The child, in the end, is that he is alive. Do not ask me how. Point and ball.I must admit that when I saw that the director was Kurt Wimmer, the same of the unfairly defenestrada by publishers "Equilibrium" and appearing therein currant William Fitchner as actor secundario(uno_de_mis_favoritos), I thought that maybe I would find something like the famous cult film before named and not distributed in Spain for mysterious reasons. But it is the day Kurt Wimmer accepted roll "it" wasn't very Catholic, of course.Dialogues: topical, empty, devoid of any reasoning or linguistically correct approach. Not even the presence of William Fitchner(actor_fetiche_de_Wimmer) manages to save the muebles.y the truth, with similar script, little can do the actors.Action: as said earlier, grossly absurd. He tired at times due to excess. Is at odds with the argument, it is unpleasant and nothing is beautiful ver(que_ael_menos,_ese_consuelo_nos_quedaría), but that above, computer effects are evil deeds. Badly made. I've seen B-movies with best digital work that Ultraviolet.La music: Repetitiva, tiresome, and a bad shadowing of "Equilibrium". With the difference that here, no sense none or accompanied. At the best of times, it passes unnoticed, in the worst, you overwhelmed. In short, a totally forgettable film in its many facets, a blur in the career of the Jovovich and Wimmer, and a waste of time if you thought have see it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/17

Verolindapechocha

El jardinero fiel

muchocine

Three good reasons to watch this movie

"The constant gardener" is based on the book of the same name, written by John le Carré, famous English writer who has already brought to the big screen other novels of espionage, as "The tailor of Panama" (2001), starring Pierce Brosnan.Hay three good reasons to see this película:1. Director: Fernando Meirelles, who was nominated for the Academy Award for his magnificent "city of God" (2003) (a film like this, based on a book). 2. The protagonists: the excellent British actors Ralph Fiennes (the English patient, 1996) and Rachel Weisz (the Mummy, 1999). 3. The issue: the serious charges against the world's pharmaceutical industry, which performs its tests using the most vulnerable humans on the planet and therefore the more "disposable": the poor of the African continent, the perfect humanillos of the Indies. In this case, children, which makes the complaint more hawkish.Long ago, when I was working in the area of communication of the International Red Cross, I was surprised a note as well press issued in Geneva entitled something as "not international donations of medicines for the third world". "The Red Cross became crazy", I thought, but reading the contents of the note I realized the reason for your request: most donations consist of past drugs that would cause more harm than relief. Watching "The constant gardener" I me realize that the problem goes beyond past medicines, but that involves medicines in test for the major pandemics that are coming to us.Perhaps seeing the numbers, cold and calculadoramente, currently deaths from these tests, prevent millions of deaths more in the future. But who are these industries mafias to decide on thousands of lives?In a moment of the film, the protagonist asks why pharmaceutical companies make their tests directly in human and replied you that because it is easier to correct than prevent, also that in that way, be they advanced to other laboratories in the competition. A strong enough denunciation.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2650

Rafa Ferrer

Ratatouille

muchocine

The story is nice, like large and small (do although they ended up getting tired when the party as more humane and less? does Mousetrap?) and as they have captured the French capital is of complete hallucinates.

I had many hopes placed in this new installment of Pixar, although I must admit that when I learned of the proposal that this time brought us the team of John Lasseter, imagined that little (say nothing) could count the lives of a rodent in a kitchen, and once again, view once, my opinion may not be more favourable.The story is nice, like large and small (though they ended up getting tired when the party as more humane and less "buzzard") and as they have captured the French capital is of complete hallucinates, especially when I was just a year and see their animations are more realistic and convincing as possible.Pixar is again exceeded what digital animation is concerned, although still not overcome its unfinished business, (humans are still looking like rubber instead of flesh and blood), although again the effects of water (so hard to find in digital animation) as well as the fur of the rodents are quite achieved.It is true that the movie has a change of pace rather curious towards the middle of the footage where one wonders if history comes to more or simply stays there, braking in time, fortunately appears that Pixar realized the "mess" and printed to film more rapidly towards the end of the same, by the way, that no one forget the short project before the movie because it is amazing.The score that Michael Giacchino, is quite good, by true Giacchino is this becoming usual in scores of Pixar, bringing this time certain cuts afrancesados music typical of comedy.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/685

Silvia Giner

Hijos de los hombres

muchocine

Not intended to be a science fiction to use film, but it has really lacked a little more risk, the director would have to have contributed something to his film rather than simply adapt a great book.

Children of men, is an adaptation of the novel by science fiction writer P.D. James, like the film, narrates the anarchy that has plunged the world, in the not too distant future (2027) result of infertility women and consequently the imminent extinction of humans. Everything from the eyes and experiences of Theo, an ex-activista which will be involved in a dangerous mission, almost without thinking about it, a mission on which depends the future of humanity. Clive Owen (Theo), manly actor that we have seen in other titles such as "Arthurian" or more recently "Hidden Plan", again to seduce us with its organic interpretation in this film. I have to say, that the weight of the plot falls on their shoulders and holds it very decently, I think it was not a role for any actor, it was the profile of a hero, only Clive could hold in their eyes the time and space while walking between soldiers supporting the mother and her baby, only he can achieve that lookthat says it all without saying absolutely nothing. As an alternative to Clive, Russell Crowe, would have been a good option.I must point out that the effects (see fair labor scene frames in which the child is dragged outside the womb of his mother, the realism achieved), are very achieved. All scenes of the war are shot in very elegant and real, difficult thing when war comes, that some directors tend to exaggerate and dramatize too much, making losing importance to other things. Tension is maintained throughout the entire film, with blows of reality. Although mixed notes of humor, the slap of reality again over and over again, waking you from a possible happy ending.Open final in which could guess metal laughter, come from the interior of a ship "Tomorrow", the standard of the human project which will return the fertility to women and repoblará our world, meaning, that finally the girl is brought to where it was intended to be carried and the Mission has been a success.Highlight the great results of the steady-Cam, although despite all positive to my particularly the film not just me convince. I expected much more than one title which has been in a "quite normal". Not intended to be a science fiction to use film, but it has really lacked a little more risk, the director would have to have contributed something to his film rather than simply adapt a great book. In the trajectory of the director, Alfonso Cuarón, Mexican cradle figure prominently, the production of el laberinto del fauno (curiously enough endings of both titles seemed related) recently and the direction of Harry Potter and the prisoner of Azkaban (that's funny, another adaptation), and "Y tu mamá also", of which he wrote the screenplay. This occasion Cuarón, guioniza, directs and monta "Children of men" who before expectations has become a disappointment.I had fun especially, Michael Caine, with his "finger Buscar", I think that it has built a character that could represent the anti-hero, but since then very comical.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4369

Sandra Ríos

Ahora o nunca

muchocine

If it hadn't been for the presence and genius Morgan Freeman and Jack Nicholson this tape would be easily forgotten.

Jack Nicholson was said about this film: "are the things you do in life, which you most sorry, not that you do" and might say then that this is the phrase that contains the deepest sense who can it be now or never as it resulted in Spain or before starting as it did in my country. This American comedy has already made its premiere in the majority of countries and was quite chart in the United States even came to occupy the first place at the box office, something which seems exaggerated to me after seeing a tape. Today to managed to collect a little more $ 80 million with his low-budget of around 45 million.There is an undeniable magic tape despite the simplicity of its history and great modesty of its production. Obviously the main cause of this magic are the two "mega" actors Jack Nicholson and Morgan Freeman and the fact of seeing them reunited for the first time. The second thing is the intention, to some extent successful, generate comedy at the expense of one of the diseases most fatal today and that makes them vulnerable from the youngest of beings to the more old, from the weakest to the more strong, thus turning it into a universal, intimate, story that touches the fibers and that more than one could be identified.The interesting thing about the film is the dialogue underpinning these two monsters of the performance, because the rest details and elements can completely ignore. Dialogues are entertaining, funny and put us to think and reflect on the decisions we take or which fail to take in our lives. The Bucket List, name is original, of those tapes which we comfort the soul, make us dream and manage us to make out the skin to the point almost make us cry. Another of the interesting things about the film is seeing as it maintains throughout its length, between the thin line that separates this plot of the tragic and the comic without really reach exceed some of them, allowing in this way, that of a real and painful topic as it is cancerRemove us some accounts shy and respectful laughs.But there are things that are not also operated in this film as e.g. mounting much of his scenes that are enforced and quite unrealistic, subtracting the importance enough to be considered a good tape with uppercase B. Nor is there a waste of intelligent dialogues, which should not be confused with a waste, that Yes, but genius hand Nicholson to know "how to say" a few dialogues simple so that they sound as such. In fact, this feature is easily palpable because right in the moments that were proposed, they manage to make you laugh, cry or unfortunate viewers.There is not much to really say about this film that we could call as a typical American film which tries to earn some money that is saved by the fact of bringing together the two oscarizados actors, but sins by his exaggerated modesty and lack of caution to take care of many details in their scenes.I wonder: what will have been of this film but had benefited from the participation of these two actors? They noticed the amount of times I mentioned at Freeman and Nicholson in this post? That is not more than the evidence that they are the only really important engine that makes taking forward this film. I confess that the enjoyment in my innermost subjectivity and that his 1: 37 min passed relatively quickly.Before leaving, it is simply pleasant, relaxed tape that can be seen.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/629

Ana

Infiltrados

muchocine

The movie lasts two hours and a half but there is no time to take breath. Note the mastery of Scorsese and love for cinema.

The duality of the character told in two parallel lives. Two guys out of the Police Academy. One becomes police but is actually an infiltration of the Irish mafia. The other they close the doors to be police unless they accept impersonate gangster to inform them about Frank Costello (Jack Nicholson), but do not offer any support and for being a very secret situation even kept a file on him. It is a complicated plot. As it can be inferred that the two stories together in a point: the girl. Well, that is the only thing predictable. The movie lasts two hours and a half but there is no time to take breath.The film is never boring and takes an abrupt rhythm. The scenes are cut without a breath of dead air. But with Supreme ability to show what is necessary so that the history is understood, and sits. Play much with the form without losing balance. The plot is quite complicated and there are many characters, but does not lose you. That if there is to be careful.The film is violent. Very violent, but not too much. Although I accept that I have weakness by the mafia. And even if I dislike it exaggerated violence, when it comes to organized crime it is different. Especially because it's more about the character, the desperate to survive. When it makes perfect sense crash a beer mug someone on the head or grab fist, because it is violence born of correct an injustice that though this good is not the nature human. The first time that Frank Costello meets the character of Matt Damon is going to be his protégé covert has about 10 years; and Frank tells him: "At your age told us that you can become thief or police." "What I am saying is this, when you point with a loaded revolver, what difference is there?"Infiltrators is not a politically correct film, it is just the opposite. Probably it is not offending any group of people. But if you intend to show all the faces of corruption could not be otherwise. It is so authentic and proper as the soundtrack of anglicized with Irish bagpipes.The character of Leonardo DiCaprio is in a truly desperate situation. And it shows but his hands never tremble. The police doesn't offer any guarantee and it is obvious that at any time they could gut. You don't have anyone and she cannot sleep. DiCaprio embodies it with subtlety. Is the height, and this along with Jack Nicholson suit grey Leopard tie, content but obsessive.In a moment, but only a moment, this film came to remember me Cidade de Deus (city of God), which is the best movie I've seen in recent times. You can not say it is Goodfellas, but it is very good. Note the mastery of Scorsese and love for cinema.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3208

José A. Peig

Blade runner

muchocine

A whole risked that Ridley Scott managed to combine with harmony and great visual sense, reflecting a world from which emanate the loneliness and melancholy, moments close to the dreams and the expressionist stroke.

They were few critics that have failed to appreciate the difficulty Scott to tell a simple story with simplicity. On the basis of the appraisal on their day made by Diego Galán (diario El País, February 2, 1983), we again noted the imperative claims of the role of film critic as someone that, first and foremost, must have the capacity of understanding required more beyond appearances and judgments made lightly. Despite this, and curiously, consider that the statement of Galán is not entirely misguided, and partly explains why spent several years before Blade Runner took the plaudits.Firstly, he noted a feature of the film which, in the view of many critics, is the main defect and the most obvious. Blade Runner, indeed, tells a simple story, but at no time is that there are difficulties in a fluid narrative and a structured script so confined to expose what is essential. The dialogues are scarce, often the gesture, the look and the framing that draws the position of a character in solitude to live in a decadent world, have greater narrative relevance that the words, and this indicates that we we have a mainly visual film. Put another way, the continent is dominated on the content. It seems that Ridley Scott is more concerned with creating atmospheres and beauticians images than to develop the psychology of the characters, the relationship between them, and the background of the story. There where, apparently, there is an imbalance between form and substance, in fact, there is a perfect synchrony between scenario and staging, between the (concise despite his extravagance) visual space, with its cadences and rhythms, and the history of the main characters, which runs also rhythmic and pace slow, as a tear which is slowly falling, until the end.Broadly speaking, therefore the visual imagery executed by this filmmaker at the service of the poetics of the story, with the sadness and the loneliness that are themselves. It is at this point where can better understand the comment of Diego Galán, for whom the self-absorption of Scott would lead to excessive use of the flat long, visual density, the repetitive Word, the sluggishness that often manifest the development of sequences. All this hinders a story that - a suppose - could dispense with both contemplative shantytowns. Simplicity is always a couple virtue with the complexity. Why, despite their "flaws" film triumphs by the comprehensive existing conjunction between all parties. No embargo. why we think that dialogs are somewhat tasteless?. Indeed, except specific cases, and if the shortage of dialogues outside little, the words spoken by the characters (even the voiceover) not reveal much more than what the image expresses itself, especially in the scenes that describe the relationship between Deckard and Rachael. Do the test, remove the volume to the device and you will see that the expression of the eyes and gestures are sufficient to know what is brewing in the scene. This is called cinema in its purest form. The dialogues, in short, follow a concise scheme to the millimetre, an adjacent reinforcing - when the situation requires - the meaning of the image.Even the most celebrated statement, and that to a greater extent it has risen to the film to the category of myth and paradigm, we can serve to exemplify this trait: I have seen things that you could not even imagine. . The focus of the expressions of Rutger Hauer and Harrison Ford, the first sitting in a manner similar to the "Lotus posture" and the second defeated and surprised by the unexpected attitude of the rival, in the context of what has happened previously, more the symbolic element of the Dove flying free after the death of Nexus six, constitute the essential meaning of the passage: the exaltation of life through death accepted by the replicant. The Nexus six words are an ornament, an addition that embellishes an image already on its beautiful and narrative validity. We insist, remove the voice and check yourselves (but do not forget, if they can, to open the channel of the soundtrack, masterful musical composition by Vangelis that expresses all the tragic lyricism in each sequence). After Kubrick, Ridley Scott renewed the genre of science fiction to elevate it to a State worthy of Shakespeare and Nietzsche. Images from the start, refinery fires and a confusion of lights and sounds that are covered by an eye, look, see consciousness (and flow of feelings and emotions that that implies), fundamental leitmotif in the course of the film, along with the significance of remembrance. Life is memory, we are our memories. Memory, in this case, generated with the image of the photographs.We have already discussed the importance of the expressiveness of eyes over any dialogue. And it is that, in this film, the eyes are the heart of the characters and the universe represented. If consider six Nexus as the personification of the spirit of the work, the gaze of the whole remaining is at odds to the Messianic look and mystic quasi of Nexus, the eye that contains everything and which, in the end, said the merit and the sense of its existence on the fact of seeing: I have seen things that you... Therefore, the eye as a symbolic element (see also the OWL of Tyrell), life and personal wealth is built with the variety of sensations and Visual perceptions, idea very coherent with the richness of textures that Scott immerses us in a fascinating world full of contrasts, between the reverie and decay, synthesis of futurism, antiquity and tradition. Let's see: I've seen attack ships on fire more than Orion. I've seen shine rays (c) in the dark near the Tanhauser gate. . Here we see Nexus as the conscious look that has internalized his experience of the world to become soul, his way of loving the world and, hence, to life. If the love of Nexus for life exceeds the undefined and Deckard vacuum it is precisely, because the conscience of Nexus covers more extensions and depths.No one better that he knows that the fear of death is a powerful instrument of slavery, as no one in the film cries, in the way that he does, for his dead friends.This leads us to the Nexus rebellion against the creator, metaphor of the human condition. I've equipped with eyes to see the world, the ability to generate feelings to love him, but the time is insufficient. Give me eternal life. But the creator imposes its laws, and the rebel Angel decides to kill the creator destroying his undeserved ability to see. You are not worthy of your creation. After the huge lenses of glass eyes. The expression on the face of Nexus reveals his pain by the fact of life.As we see, there is much symbolism and many references to the Judeo-Christian mythology (not to mention nor those hands punched by "nails of Christ"). Perhaps in this aspect is where most deteriorates the work, by the excessive mysticism in a tale of science fiction that did not need to refer to the religious symbols so explicitly. And in another order of things, and related to an earlier comment, excess footage because of the renascence in the purely aesthetic intention represents a setback to the smooth and concise narrative. In any case, this aspect is not Resolutive by numerous variables hermeneutics which they influence their assessment, and, accordingly, we do not consider that you harm to all parties that, synthesized into a coherent whole, they have created a perfect work. The debate, without more is open. The sentimental relationship between Deckard and Rachael can also be a critical point in the story, it seems an element forced with the mere purpose of stress the psychological crossroads of Deckard. And that is the necessary role played by Rachael: the element that embodies or motivating to a greater extent the moral and emotional dilemma of the Hunter of droids.Blade Runner, also, as a synthesis of universes and cross-genres. Film Noir, science fiction, the western, the almost medieval Gothic in the fortress of Tyrell, a risky set but that Ridley Scott managed to combine with harmony and great visual sense, reflecting a world from which emanate the loneliness and melancholy, moments close to the dreams and the expressionist stroke. Too bad that she cannot live. But who lives?. Where find the line that separates the human of the cybernetic? If what matters is the conscience of see, love and remember, some sense of the world and the rules of the game that Deckard has been forced to play? Isn't he a replicant?. We are Replicants until we have shown that we are human.All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in the rain. It is time to die.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2798

Kiko de España

Los Renegados del Diablo

muchocine

Rob Zombie is better director than musician. After the great House of the thousand corpses and while hope their particular version of the classic John Carpenter Halloween review, in the form of director´s cut, his second work.

Rob Zombie is better director than musician. After the great House of the thousand corpses and while hope their particular version of the classic John Carpenter Halloween review, in the form of director´s cut, his second work.Three minutes shorter than the version released in theaters the movie is, as not, dirty, cruel, bloody and full of dust. Boot, the first nearly fifteen minutes, credits included, are pure Peckinpah but not only by the frozen frame, no, not we go wrong. Share with the old master pleasure by the ambiguous by the anti-hero characters, although here the anti-hero is a Satanic family of serial killers.And it is in danger. The story of revenge from a madero (genius William Forsythe) brother of the poli died in the best sequence of the prequel original leaves in its infancy of father courage, what happens that this estimated worst consequences. Before that, memorable dialogue between police and film critic that gives title to this chronicle.Unforgettable Sid Haig and above all a mansónico (or mansoniano) Bill Moseley. And those jeans of Sheri Moon. With a mad desire to see Halloween, do be in Sitges?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2663

Plissken

Planet Terror

muchocine

Rodriguez has a brutal budget (and takes it), and although work on make a bad movie, just leaving a hilarious "qualité" macarrada.

Beginning of the film: as a reaction to the foolish trailer for 'Machete', several loud sound from every corner of the room. Ten minutes of projection of 'Planet Terror': some people start to stir in their seats to nibble their glasses of soda or nailing killer looks to her partner, probably responsible for that are seeing that piece of garbage instead of the of the Bourne that. Half an hour of 'Planet Terror' screening: six or seven couples leave room between arcades and looks of disgust to the rest of the attendees.I love when a filmmaker achieves its purpose.Robert Rodriguez honors with 'Planet Terror' his particular casposas movies from zombies, on the one hand, and the action movies of bottom shelf video store, on the other. And it is all a look greenish, crappy, crappy so that it knows to be part of this project called 'Grindhouse' which, unfortunately, has not worked as the Weinstein Bros.. They hoped. But in my opinion, not needed: 'Planet Terror' is a magnificent film casposa luxury, to the chagrin of the absent-minded summer Viewer.The synopsis can be behind any Record Vision cover (thinking they were those who brought 'Reservoir Dogs' Spain) or one of these movies of the Cannon: "A mysterious plague threatens the quiet existence of a small Texan town. '"The Wray', a mysterious trucker, and Cherry Darling, an explosive go-go dancer, are the last hope for the terrified inhabitants. "Draining corpses, action and explosions in abundance in a film that you will not forget!"Thus, Rodríguez manages a great divertimento soaked gore's references to the genre, but with a shade more eighties than setentero: starting with the parade of old glories ("Grass cutter" Jeff Fahey, Michael Biehn "Terminator", Carlos "El Mariachi" Gallardo, Cheech Marin.) and continuing with the badass tone "Delta Force" at its beginning. Later, the zombie gore takes over the narration between funny lapidary phrases, mutilation and explosions without ton haphazardly; and in its final stretch, the delirium of the paramilitary plot and the myth of the flight of the few survivors to paradise lost. All this between buckets and buckets of blood, pus, and other fluids. And Furthermore, a couple really charismatic protagonist (magnetic Rose McGowan and Freddy Rodríguez) and a brilliant Marley Shelton, even on the edge of absurdity. 'Planet Terror' doesn't offer neither more nor less than the same already offered 'The Bronx warriors', 'The day of the dead' or any of those small new posts of late 1970s and early 1980s: action, blood and a free sex scene. What happens is that Rodriguez has a brutal budget (and take advantage of it), and although work on make a bad movie, just coming out a hilarious "qualité" macarrada.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2270

Iñaki Bilbao

Corazones solitarios (Lonely Hearts)

muchocine

Interesting work, which deals with a real criminal history that has already inspired some other films. It is not bad, being entertaining at all times.

Interesting work, which deals with a real criminal history that has already inspired some other films. It is not bad, being entertaining at all times. Performers do well, especially Salma Hayek and James Gandolfini.La atmosphere is perfect (the action takes place shortly after the end of World War II).However, I do not liked much to say, since the history of the two criminals already had seen before, narrated from another point of view, in "Deep crimson", Arturo Ripstein, with the surprise and my personal interest in the plot, was rather diluted.It is true, however, that "Lonely Hearts" is not a remake because the script deals with the story from the points of view, both the pair of criminals, and the couple of policemen that tenaciously follow the track.And interesting parallelism, the points in common, which have in common some characters that are not, on the other hand, more different from one another. I am referring to the abominable character of Salma Hayek and the tormented police soberly interpreted by John Travolta.Esta dichotomy is well reflected, above all in the interrogation scene.Punishment, in my opinion, is that the development of the story fails to be as efficient as its presentation, as its inception, truly impressive. Their first minutes, the presentation of the film, are the best, while duran credits. Then it is irregular, although technically is impeccable.The realization, rather conventional, is what makes this work does not reach the altitude that certainly deserved. But entertaining enough, although you can ask you more.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2590

Rafa Ferrer

Planet Terror

muchocine

It was perhaps the 2 tape that compose the film that most interest me produced, and is that the image of Rose McGowan (the already mythical Paige Matthews of "Charmed") with a machine gun instead of one of his legs, and I woke up some morbid fascination and curiosity, feel an extraordinary precedent in a movie, cumbersome and scurfy which deserves the penalty not be forgotten.

It was perhaps the 2 tape that compose the film that most interest me produced, and is that the image of Rose McGowan (the already mythical Paige Matthews of "Charmed") with a machine gun instead of one of his legs, and I woke up some morbid fascination and curiosity.Say that in "Grindhouse" is taken care of everything from their non-existent trailers to the blurred image of the celluloid, everything smells like that roñoso film of continuous session that many have enjoyed in our childhood, this double programme where it was possible to mix any film and view from the afternoon until the evening, reenganchando with what he had not been able to see.Rodriguez made up a debtor partly from his previous work film (I am referring to the excellent "Sin City" where the cameo appearances occur everywhere, and it is that the appearances of Bruce Willis as well as Tarantino (the other architect of this tape), an extraordinary precedent in a movie, cumbersome/scurfy which deserves the penalty not be forgotten; by the way), before that I forget, can also enjoy, even if only in a couple of scenes from the presence of Stacy Ferguson, singer of the "Black Eyes Peas", giving life to a "jamona" appearing on the tape.The author of "El Mariachi" (among others), filled with the gore tape uncut is, indeed at times is more comic than tragic, or disgusting as the offal appears over and over again on screen, without the minor hint of concern towards the audience to jelly and is pleased with the destripada meat appearing everywhere.Apart from Rose McGowan, will certainly not happen to the annals of cinema with his interpretation, but if with his physique, notably Freddy Rodriguez, with his character of Wray, a hero of action, of yore, the style of Van Damme, Stallone and company.Particularly worrying is the role of Marley Shelton, with a face of horror/terror during much of the footage, and that the presence of the camera just Rodriguez with her large blue eyes comes as ring to the finger.Something that we will lose in Spain, by the way, is the lack of rolls (which here is obvious, ridiculous and even funny) annul the possibility to follow the argument so that one has to imagine (or believe) that tell us, without having seen previously.Simply great, brilliantly simple.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/640

Mario

El laberinto del fauno

muchocine

It is clear that I am not objective with Guillermo del Toro, but even so, I believe that I am able to say that the laberinto del fauno is his best work so far.

With some filmmakers it happens? with many not the truth, but occasionally movie premieres typical director you know you did not disappoint. Not I am referring to those who have made the great masterpieces of the twentieth century? the same that later arrastraran in unfortunate projects, because Hollywood is well - and that you fail over and over again, perhaps because the degree of demand is too high. Rather speak of this caste of artisans of class media that normally maintain a level of consistent quality in all of his films; in my opinion, Guillermo del Toro belongs to that school of film buffs who always adhere to, which are able to deal with a big hollywodiense and carry the day out and at the same time make room for more personal achievements.Eager to spend a good time and trust that does not disappoint me, I went the premiere to see the laberinto del fauno, one of these projects in turn more staff that arise in black and boys vampire demon. Filmed in the mother tongue of the Mexican and euros and pesos rather than dollars, William returned to the pseudo-universo already raised in the spine of the devil, which is around the Spanish civil war - either before, during or after - and that both had pleased me in its previous edition. Everything pointed to a good session of popcorn? that could not wait was to find me with one of the best films of fantasy genre that I've seen in a long time.El laberinto del fauno is, above all, a story. A story of love and death, of tenderness and violence, that combines fantasy and reality as if a Martini with vodka were (not busy) the combination of a dream world with the stark reality is magnificent, the fantastic journey of Ophelia (the girl protagonist) with the maquis rough fight the fascist regime recently implanted in Spain we intercalamos throughout the film. Both arguments are interwoven and enjoy a power amazing, wanting to in each case, as a viewer, that action will not end to change the third.On the side of the mundane a magnificent Jordi López represents the typical archetype of the military fascist and Franco. Strong and strict, devoid of any kind of scruples when occasion requires and severe even with their loved ones; a real bastard that fills the belly of lamb while it decides to grant a single Primer of rationing to every family dependants. Do do the topic works perfectly, because every story requires of a? bad?, and Captain Vidal is a perfect son of a bitch. Many of the hiperviolentas sequences which stars give a great intensity to the story, intensity that I do not know until that point would have been possible if the roll had spoken in English.One of the strengths of the tape is the emotional part, concerns emerge during the footage: you feel the powerlessness of the massacred maquis, are aware of the suffering of some characters, you leave take the magical world that runs the girl and get to claim revenge on more than one occasion. Moments like the starring the stuttering guerrilla are simply excellent and make succeed the film where wrecked the Devil's backbone, that was a horror story that did not fear, in this occasion we encounter a fable that it excites. Much blame for this her have the actors, whom I greatly emphasize the doctor (Alex Angulo) and the maid (Maribel Verdú) while on this occasion are you not tits - which embroider their roles, being the Doctor, protagonist of one of the most exciting moments of the length.The technical Bill for the film is really impeccable, at the level of any Yankee production. The special effects are the best I've seen, combining digital technology with a traditional component of costumes, make-up and props. The Faun? who gives life Doug Jones, who interpreted to Abe Sapiens Hellboy - it is especially successful and some creatures, such as which has eyes on the palms of the hands are amazing. An example of know-how. On the other hand, the music, composed by Javier Navarrete, also charged prominence as it progresses the tape seizing virtually it towards the end.Definitely, and bearing in mind that I enjoyed a by-product as Blade II by the hand of the fat of beards (especially listening to their comments on off) is clear that I am not objective with Guillermo del Toro, but even so, I think that I am prepared to say that the laberinto del fauno is his best work so far, and that it is probably not the last.To finish only I ask that you remember the moral of this story: and is that obey, so no more? not have to be correct, at least not always?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3339

Rafa Ferrer

Trabajo basura

muchocine

If your job is boring you, if you are of your head until the very, and you do not believe that nothing there is worse than your life, take a look at the film, worth, and you will not regret.

Many times I say tape needs a 2 ° viewing, to appreciate nuances, or find things that one, the first time he saw the film, he missed, this tape I can do another thing that recommend that second occasion, I remember the first time I saw her, was still a pipiolo (99 year) and although it worked, not caught all the nuances of the tapeI remember that I stayed with a couple of nuances, on the one hand the Jennifer Aniston relationship with the protagonist (that the film to be based on a daily comic strip was a "cantoso added" you can not see.) and on the other as you did the impossible life poor Milton (played by Stephen Root), who is the protagonist of the comic strip "Office Space" which gives name in V.O. film.Now, many years after its first screening, with a job each day has me more tired, and a life in common with a person, one from a completely different to the previous point, sees the tape many more malice, the character that, much more inept shows highest arrives in the company (something that happens far too often)(, where heads and leaders are always much more inept than the employees.), ugly work situation, which in this country today we also (calls charge X, that there will be one to make your work in half of what your desire.), or stupid moments but not power, encompass and compose a tape that is worth rediscovering, and that if the "romantic" part may be spent better than best, after all, and as I have already said, is an added cantoso to exploit a Jennifer Aniston newly discovered as Rachel on FRIENDS (paper repeats in 90% of the tapes stars).In short, If your job is boring you, if you are of your head until the very, and you do not believe that nothing there is worse than your life, take a look at the film, worth, and you will not regret.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3169

Rafa Ferrer

La Jungla 4.0

muchocine

At times it becomes predictable, namely, the good, the bad, a sheet of spikes that will happen? You don't have to wait long, for guess what, the "bad" vehicle is a truck where eventually the tape then?

At the time, when I saw "Casino Royale", the new adventures of the new 007 said and I quote "could go through any other tape action, if it were not for the endless 007 franchise", change the 007 franchise by the of "Die Hard" (his name in V.O.) and we have cleared the equation, and it is that, we have one tape of action thatstarred, again by Bruce Willis, who after his success in this saga hartó to make movies of this nature, and accompanied by Justin Long, a kid who has left less more in this join stars on screen, and to that end up seeing up in the soup.The plot briefly inspired by an article in a magazine (Hey or novels are needed in this film.), we should go with the times, revolves around a group of terrorists computer (French, has bad sitting them at the States France has not its French arm in the subject of Iraq), which are intended to make the chaos theory already made by Jeff Goldbum in "Jurassic Park" child's playcompared with which want to rolling these in Washington also true that computer is "a tad ghost" and is that, for a server that passes much of their working day surrounded by "idems" is not believed many of the things that covered in the broader computing, appears on the screen, very conception of unreality that one is trying to, and intends to put in situation.It is impossible to see this scene and not drop!AMOS COME YAAAA! , and it is that, in this type of film you have to be with mind ready to receive all kinds of FANTASIES animated of yesterday and today.By Bruce Willis not only if they spend the years, but also the kilos, and is already more and breaking in some scenes with face of "can not with my life", on the other hand, and seeing the good make the character who plays Mary Elizabeth Winstead (onscreen daughter) one thinks a good Spin Off starring Baby Mclanegive ideas to this world of Hollywood, lacking in them.Once more the music returns to be, once again, what wrong accompanies the films of recent, blasting action, and descordinada, okay, I understand that teenagers are who paid their entry to see so great show, but it is that one just with earache of so much noise that he intends to be music.Many times we complain that in the American cinema, treat the Viewer as if it were foolish, explaining again and again things, however, in this film is just the opposite, that that is 10 min. already there is a shootout, and we have got ourselves into "into flour", but had not been better to explain the deaths of the first minutes? Especially funny are 2 references to the latest action film aficionado will find on screen, a terminator (his figure detonates the bomb the home of Justin) and another to Spawn, (a failure at the box office, contained in which Mclane starts "accidentally" an arm).Timothy Olyphant fails at any time to be a villain of entity, does not reach or the height of bitumen to its predecessors, Maggie Q does not pass to the typical villain vase and Kevin Smith (lately in any tape self-respecting) here makes a brief, almost fleeting appearance, which just adds nothing in the plot, as well as the excellent product placement of "Microsoft" and Xbox, with this covert advertising of the Gears of Wars, who appears in scene 2 times and almost without coming to story.At times it becomes predictable, namely, the good, the bad, a sheet of spikes that will happen? You don't have to wait long, for guess what, the "bad" vehicle is a truck where eventually the tape then? A LITTLE OF ORIGINALITY, BY TOUTATIS!Anyway, in short, DISAPPOINTING, DISAPPOINTING, very DISAPPOINTING.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/233

Raccord

Factotum

muchocine

Another film which is announced as a faithful reflection of the life of a writer of so-called? damned?, and is half way.

Too politically correct. One expects to find with syphilis, drunkenness, and anthologies fights in bars, and well, there is a bit of everything, but very decaffeinated. The film is not entirely bad, though it is a bit slow. The best, Matt Dillon.Vuelve to occur. And they are two in a month. Another film Announces as a faithful reflection of the life of a writer of the so called "cursed", and who stays in the medium on the way. On this occasion it's adapted to the screen, a free version of the life of Charles Bukowsky, so free that in fact, change you the name. An allegation of personal improvement of the social corsets, a reflection of the bronco and Bohemian world is more that emerged the best pages of Bukowsky. They try not to glorify the figure of the eternal loser, but simply to portray it with pastel colors. There are so many beautiful people, in my view, also subtracts claw to the environments you want to represent. Anyway, it is pretty good, and there are moments of pathos reaching thrill the Viewer. Another feature that takes interest in the movie are horrendous sentences in voice-over, that they resemble the worst without city, trying to seem very profound and poetic, but they sound like joke. In conclusion, American independent cinema and this already seems worryingly endemic in many of this "genus", with more than TV Antena 3 that of cinema made with boldness and desire to provoke.