Datasets:

SINAI

/

MCE-Corpus

like 0

Follow

Grupo de investigación en Sistemas Inteligentes de Acceso a la Información (SINAI) de la Universidad de Jaén 13

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3989

Matías Cobo

American Gangster

muchocine

A film of high quality, denoting the wise firm behind she and Scott reconciles with your most demanding audience

The career of Ridley Scott wandering in recent years irregular terrain that seemed to predict the decline of his master. Except Gladiator, abultadamente award-winning in the 2001 Oscars but enmarcable in the tradition of the best epic film, tapes as A good year, the impostors or the Kingdom of heaven left barely glimpse the shadow of the filmmaker who coined myths of the eighties as Alien or Blade Ranner film. And for his resurgence has been employed in his latest work subgenera, such as mobsters or the police thriller, as addressed by other great conductors with magnificent results. Without going any further, Martin Scorsese ended its debt with the Oscar thanks to a film located between two themes with its excellent but master The Departed.American Gangster assumes no with respect the long tradition of tapes set in the mafia and baby also in typical universes of James Ellroy as the político-policial corruption. The protagonist of his last great film is also for Scott professional reunion with Russel Crowe. And his first collaboration with Denzel Washington, actor which continues to demonstrate its capabilities to interpret almost any role.The script of the film, that part of a true story, is structured as a parallel narrative of the lives of the two protagonists, the mobster Frank Lucas and Richie Roberts police. The lives of both run along similar paths but in opposite directions. While Richie must suffer in the beginning of his career the contempt of his teammates by not acclimate to the environment of entrenched police corruption, Lucas will build on the knowledge gained from his boss, an important leader of the mafia, to collect their witness to his death and prosper to become the biggest dealer of New York of the 70.Otro key to the rapid ascent of Lucas in the heroin trafficking business was the war. In Viet Nam, many soldiers became junkies that imported his addiction to his country. The heroin was the drug of fashion, which everyone wanted and should try to be cool. Lucas, aware of this growing demand, went straight to the coveted opiate-producing source. Put in the streets a heroin of high quality at a reasonable price with excellent conditions of import obtained by rinsing with senior political and military officials who facilitated her transport to EE.UU. directly from the own Vietnam.Muy different and probably more difficult was the road until the success of Richie. His incorruptable status earned him few friends and bad reputation in a police force corrupt to the core, but on the other hand, it enabled him lead a special anti-drug unit that would remove the large tentacles of a business in full swing.Needless to say, with Crowe and Washington in the starring roles, the artistic section is covered with excess solvency, even joins them the great work of the side that surround them. On the other hand, most New York City atmosphere, in the words of Ridley Scott, les was not easy given the distant which is now the current city, clean and orderly aesthetics up in neighborhoods taken by suburbs years ago, of the look worn and dirty that the film manages to recreate splendidly.Factors such as these, as well as the agile and entertaining narrative, make American Gangster a film of high quality, denoting the wise firm behind she and Scott reconciles with his more demanding public.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2134

Txapulin

Piratas del Caribe: En el Fin del Mundo

muchocine

This third part is slightly better than the second. The argument is still not take anywhere, but at least is something more linear and less convoluted. Action scenes are well resolved and others are pathetic.

I must admit that this third part is slightly better than the second. The argument is still not take anywhere, but at least is something more linear and less convoluted. Action scenes are well resolved and others are pathetic, like "wedding" in the midst of the battle of swords, and three hours of film is still excessive duration, though not to bore.It is appreciated that the character of Jack Sparrow recovers the charisma of the first part, starring a couple of excellent and surreal scenes with a multitude of Sparrows on stage simultaneously. The scene of the ship in the desert with rocks and crabs is precisely the best of the movie. Also the recovery of Barbossa, one of the best characters of the first part is a success. Of who I was expecting much more is of Chow Yun-Fat, who plays the captain Sao Feng, and in addition to having little charisma, in the movie looks rather little. And on the gracienta to put Keith Richards, then find something surplus, but it clashes not as much as I thought. What is stupid is the scene where appear nine big Pirates of the seas, not so much for the scene itself, which is grace by the characterization of each one of the pirates, his ships and his crew, but by its consequences: a supposedly incredibly big by the number of boats in disputed naval battle is nothing because the battlewithout ceasing to be spectacular, it waged only between the two main boats and others are pure comparsa. This kind of things, in addition to the main characters change sides as the wind blows and without any logical explanation is what makes the absurd argument.Moreover, it is a movie, just like its predecessors, of great plastic beauty, and here I include from the sets, makeup and costumes to the photography, special effects and the music. total, if like the two previous ones and want them to see three spectacular hours below: go and see without remorse, will be equal. By the way, they have, as in the first, there a nod at the end of the closing credits, if they want to wait ten minutes to leave the room, which does not come from here.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/939

Daniel Galindo

Happy feet

muchocine

Recommended and impeccable production since the interest lies not in the content but in the form of tell.

Almost all, young and old, will enjoy if they film looking this acidic review of the ugly duckling fable.Of the total number of spectators hang down viewers who hate the genre, because fall in Yes, the animals that populate this remote Antarctic landscape, love each other singing. And is not an isolated from a mingles subject, since love there is, and long.Leaving aside this point, notable aspect that affects the plot, do not tell us anything new. Still it's a recommended and impeccable production since the interest lies not in the content but in the form of tell. George Miller, after signing two titles Babe, the brave piglet and the Mad Max trilogy takes the classic story of the ugly duckling, changing ducks and cinemas other ducks more southern.It subjected to an intense work of digital animation, based on the work of professional dancers. The result keeps you inward looking for details: plumage, forms of ice, human gestures. The possibilities of the new movement capturing techniques are revolutionizing the industry of animation, becoming increasingly more it fine the barrier between the real world and the artificial, but we must not forget that each level takes days and even months of work.Online musical starring human, such as Moulin Rouge, the birds sing and lead us by land paid with an excess of moralina. Do each pingüinito? the emperors, not the? latinos?-has its song of the heart, although the protagonist has gone more bailón to Fred Astaire. Here is the difference, on which all the dilemmas of the story revolve. Not us it overlooked the burden of environmental criticism proposes Happy Feet, although not to the causes of the melting of the polar icecaps. That friend is responsible for Al Gore in an inconvenient truth.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1041

Ramón Balcells

La joven del agua

muchocine

The water is a pure sample of visual poetry, extreme originality, of not tear sensitivity and, first and foremost, a big step to the Filmography of this so-called genius M. Night Shyamalan.

So far no director as Mr Shyamalan had managed to create so much intrigue in the premieres of his films. As you can see, I do not mean that his films have suspense and be entertaining (that also are), but to the public, by far than his fans expected impatient its next release. And why is it? As for the reason that his films, so hypnotic, poetic and symbolic, you submerge into another world, a world created by himself. M. Night Shyamalan is unique.In his last film, the girl of water, carried out through a story that they explained their daughters before going to sleep, the symbolism is the protagonist, or rather the gender. It could qualify this beautiful movie as a story for adults totally symbolic and poetic with the fantasy genre backdrop background (or perhaps not so Fund.). I know it may seem a paranoia, but the girl of water is a real paranoia. Or rather, her could define, focusing on the director, as the film more Shyamalan personnel, although that is not to say that it is perfect. And as sample that is its most ambitious proposal, the director has decided to do just a cameo appearance (which in my opinion was better) but it appears already as secondary (and of course indispensable) player in the plot. You know that I do not like too explain of what they try to film critic, but I think that so then you can better understand what you explain (if it is that you have not seen yet), I will tell you the brief overview: Cleveland Heep, a man locked up in itself, traumatized by a terrible past and that he does not know (or can not) see the world around youfound one fortuitous day a nymph in the pool of the apartments in which works as a maintenance man. The strange relationship that develops between them after their encounter will be nosy by monstrous beings pretenderan prevent the beautiful nymph called Story back to their world, the world blue. I believe that all the other details and moments of the film (which are numerous) are better to see them, in a film, which has more see to listen, it is essential to see it from start to finish without knowing any kind of trap, secret or little detail.This is a film with a multitude of characters (all of them bright and ironically described). All of them provide small amounts of importance to history, so it makes it more complex and entertaining. The two protagonists, Paul Giamatti and Bryce Dallas Howard, both the side have been excellent private elections. Think timely attention to Jeffrey Wright (as the addict to crosswords), Bob Balaban (in the role of an unsympathetic and eccentric film critic), Sarita Choudhury (as the sister of the Shyamalan actor), Bill Irwin (as Mr. Leeds, that man who takes life in apartments), Cindy Leung (as the Chinese daughter of the mother who knows the history of the blue world) and the set of friends that don't stop smoking, although prohibited in his small apartment. Girl with water is full of memorable scenes, and therefore I decided to describe some of them (briefly if you can), the most significant of the film. I will begin with the start (if someone does not want to know details about the film that do not read the next paragraph): the film opens with a beautiful and totally symbolic splendidly followed by drawings that tell the story of the people of the water with the humans, who after being with them, decided to secede and worry about themselves. This introduction is what makes you enter in the movie, so if you don't like or you think simple and pathetic, most worth you not see more piece of film, not worth it. For those who the opening, worthy of children's stories, has excited les (like me), look at the following sequences that I will mention (without disclosing part of the outcome, this time is not surprise). Although it is not too important to the plot, the first image of Paul Giamatti trying to kill a bug that was introduced in the apartment of some South American inhabitants who are shouting as desperate to the alleged asquerosidad of the animal is, apart from ironic, a great re-examine, symbol of the man before the apparent small animal. The second sequence to feature is the first dialogue between Story and Cleveland, paused and full sensitivity. When the protagonist is immersed in the pool, or rather, the hidden world of the by then unknown Story, is a scene that appears to terror and scares, but instead what he wants to transmit is said discovery, a step more in the history of Story. Another significant sequence is that of Paul Giamatti will trying to fight against the enemies of Story, at the same time tells you the steps to be followed so not attacked by evil beings (do not go into details). But the best for me is the Cleveland healing the wounds of Story nothing more than with the heart. And finally, the flat end, with that blurry Giamatti by water from the pool that has changed my life. These scenes would be so much beauty without the brilliant director of photography Christopher Doyle (usual collaborator of Wong Kar Wai). M Night Shyamalan has mixed and embedded all the pieces of this complicated puzzle with the intention of saving the beautiful Maja, to create what can be called a happy end that rewards all. As I said before, you don't have a fixed genus. In girl with the water you can find Paul Giamatti making the clown imitating a child for him to tell a story (which by the way, makes it very well) and the following scene and the sequence following a fearsome perro-lobo who wants to eat who crosses his path. To which I wish to refer is the great mix of genres, with the dominant drama, created by the Indian director.This proposed risky also enjoys an excellent soundtrack (attention to the main theme) composed by James Newton Howard (always present in the films of director), a working Assembly and impeccable editing, Visual effects extraordinary (although they are unimportant), a more elaborate script and a witty address.The water is a pure sample of visual poetry, extreme originality, of not tear sensitivity and, first and foremost, a big step to the Filmography of this so-called genius M. Night Shyamalan. It is not perfect, and that is why I admire her. The stories have never been perfect and less those who depart from one makeshift.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3783

Carlos Giacomelli Puig

Mr Brooks

muchocine

Correct thriller double personalities and hunt down the killer, that despite its flaws does not let be a relatively atypical entertainment given the times.

Kevin Costner returns with a dark thriller that plays the role of a successful businessman and family guy night giving vent to their terrible desires of blood and death. Demi Moore will be the inspector responsible for attempting to stem the tide of evil crimes which leads to this Mr Brooks.Bruce a. Evans proposal cannot draw attention for several reasons. First and foremost, because it assumed the reunion of Costner and Moore with the public (in recent years, it is difficult to see films in which one of the two to be protagonist, and they usually do not have much success at the box office), but also because the concept that the film seemed to offer a priori wanted original, very different from the thrillers that have been released in recent years.When it comes to the truth, that originality is true only in part, is ultimately what "Mr. Brooks" not more than a two-hour series "Dexter" chapter. But it does not mean necessarily something negative.If you take a look at the latest films of this genre, it is not difficult to see how same pattern is has been repeated with increasingly more emphasis, both visually and mounting. I am referring to the "CSI" series. So great is the success of this, that the nearly all film premieres drink with increasingly more brazenness of it.However "Mr. Brooks" chooses to completely change the tone, which is why in advance already represents a breath of fresh air among so overused gender. Visual sobriety and the rejection of the videocliperos mounts already mean major progress, but it is that also likened to something so much quality as "Dexter" does not imply more downside than the consequent lack of personality. But although Evans constantly plays with falling into a bland plagiarism, manages to avoid it by providing his film of a basic element to distinguish it, which is also a great success for the same. I am referring to Marshall, character played by William Hurt an excellent which is the incarnation of the madness of the protagonist, a kind of demonic guardian angel, alter ego who is calling him to continue killing. Dialogues between him (cynical and stinging) and Costner are certainly the best of the film, then give this Ribbon of distinction much-needed.It is mainly through these dialogues (and any more that it maintains with other side) understand the mentality of Mr Brooks, tormented man (by some, rather than correct interpretation of Costner) which recognizes addicted to murder. You don't like, but you can not stop by far that I try dismay is increasing while trying to avoid symptoms of weakness to their loved ones.At a more general level, the script maintains a fluid and constant pace, and manages to entertain despite its slow development. It can accuse him, that Yes, the inclusion of a cluster of secondary stories stretched in excess that, ultimately, bring absolutely nothing to the history major and only serve to hinder the pace and not finish developing the personality of the protagonist.What we have, because it is a proper thriller double personalities and hunt down the killer, that despite its flaws of being a relatively atypical entertainment given the timing that they run, and therefore none negligible. The question that leaves around me by the head is if "Mr. Brooks" existed do not "Dexter".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/147

Alvaro Oliva

El hombre del tiempo

muchocine

Curious and interesting, movie will not reach around the world, as it was the case with?To purpose of Schimdt? and?Strange coincidences?

Gore Vervinski dares to this drama tragicomic after having passed the terror with The Ring (the signal), the adventure with Pirates of the Caribbean and the road movie with The Mexican. The interesting thing about this new proposal is that you it's a rather unusual film. Fails to convince at all, but it makes us think about many aspects of life. Nicolas Cage is a man who has much success in his work but his life is not very accomplished. You have problems with people, strangers that pull him food when they see him on the street, and the most important: with his family. Michael Caine plays his father (which is already an incentive) with which has a good, although complex relationship. Then are his sons, his ex-wife and the boyfriend. David Spritz (Nicolas Cage) is a local television time man, who can sign for one of the national channels, with the consequent increase in salary and luxuries that this entails. Up there either, but on the other hand is an apathetic, angry man, metepatas, a character that just dropping you well and that you feel compassion in many moments by inept that becomes. But not everything is bad in it, what happens that they will often twist situations. Tries to help his daughter, offering it different hobbies which she rejects altogether, for example. Archery. This hobby will become balm for all your problems and help you relate a little better with people, as it tends to be very angry with anyone who recognizes him and asked how will be the climate. It also tries to get back with his ex-wife but not he achieves success with their strategies. Vervinski also offers us the positive and negative of being a popular face side. So hard that it is the school when you're little and you amoldas not to the usual stereotypes, as it is the case with the daughter of Cage; and as well as the confidence and the actions to be done by our family. In short "The man of the time" is a curious and interesting, film will not reach around the world, as it was the case with "A propósito de Schimdt" and "Strange coincidences".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2565

Jose Contreras

Next

muchocine

Not premonitions were needed to demonstrate that he liked the girl. They had to Jessica Biel.

Spielberg said that you filming the film that you would like to see as a spectator, Tamahori, probably, you could say the same. What differentiates them is just that Tamahori is worst spectator.Nicholas Cage has a superpower that lets you know what will happen with two minutes in advance. It uses cover cheap Wizard's Hall, and occasionally gives a blow in a Las Vegas casino. The police seeks it to help them to prevent a catastrophe. He is looking for a girl who appeared in one of her premonitions. Its weak point is his humanity; It is not able to follow indifferent when it knows what will happen to someone else.The theme of the anticipation gives food for thought. One arises if the massacre of 11-M or 11-S could have been avoided with the advantage of two minutes. Perhaps a car accident. But we are not witnesses of many road accidents in life. Cage wants to meet the girl, approaching and she gives you long. So try to start another conversation. We discovered that the scene wasn't real; It was early, so you can fix it. A life with anticipations seems a virtual life, or Windows: all bugs can be repaired. There is no the blunders, the lapses, accidents or chance. Almost disappears entirely what one considered film.Police searching for Cage, which is logical, criminals also seek, and that bordering on abuse. Tamahori already had enough of our credulity with the history of the two minutes. It is not of Knights ask for more so we created criminals and also about that, if it's the girl, the magician anticipates so much in advance. Premonitions nor were needed to demonstrate that he liked the girl. They had to Jessica Biel.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2898

Agente Cooper

Death Proof

muchocine

A loco of the road walk loose and looks dam sexy (an attempt to summarize a film without sense and with little argument...)

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3638

Andrés Pons

Maniac

muchocine

Ultimately one of the summits of the decadent and sick gore.

The author of MANIAC COP dead or alive July 4 among others came to be one of the most brutal ever seen films.Shot almost in amateur mode which gives a rough look with a dirt so real that even thought if it was a SNUFF.A work that flies high above its scenes of death where he focuses on the figure of the killer (awesome JOE SPINELL Visto in rocky and the Godfather).A figure that degenerates gradually leading to a poetic ending shot with a strong force and adentandronos in a dark mind in an atrocious way. Even in spite of its low budget photography, music, decorados decorated stick well to this aura of nightmare being notable makeup giving realism to all its GORE scenes.If it were not enough acts the legendary CAROLINE MUNRO (Dracula 73 or Captain cronos).Ultimately one of the summits of the decadent and sick GORE.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1121

Jeremy Fox

Babel

muchocine

Well directed, well performed and it is sufficiently entertaining, but is far from being the masterpiece many trumpets. One thing are the intentions or the message, and quite another the artistic result.

"Heralded as the end of the trilogy of the tandem formed by Guillermo Arriaga and Alejandro González Iñárritu guionista-director pain, at last I could see what will be, in all probability, one of the most nominated films at the oscars this year.""Babel," tells us several interwoven stories which have an unfortunate accident as epicenter: some children in Morocco shoot and injure an American tourist (Cate Blanchett), who is travelling with her husband (Brad Pitt).I will say it bluntly: the film I like but I was disappointed. After all the positive reviews that had heard about her, praising her as great narrative exercise, poetry in images or great script expected me more. I'm glad that screenwriter and director have decided not to do more joint work because I believe that it is time that both fly separately before the start to be too repetitivosMe like the way of directing Iñárritu, and I agree that creates images of great beauty, also supported in a magnificent photography and a good soundtrack. He knows to create emotional and dramatic tension with very few elements in a scene; something essential in a good director.The actors are all superb, especially inspired Adriana Barraza in his role as caretaker of the sons of the American couple and Rinko Kikuchi as sordomuda. It is a pity that Spain the film is issued folded because it is not only sense the title, message, and many scenes but that, Furthermore, we lose a very important part of these interpretations. I believe that Franco is dead long enough so we'd us one of their first "cultural" laws without too many regrets, no?Turning to the issue before us, in my opinion the main problem is the script. It seems a good idea, that of the apparently non-event event, in a kind of butterfly effect, giving rise to all the events of the film, but I think that there are things that are too caught by the hairs.And I do not mean, only, that there are elements difficult to believe, that it is also a handicap in a film that is not sold as a fable (something which very well made "Crash", for example) but as a "realistic" and in-depth portrait about the problem of solitary confinement and lack of understanding. I mean that, in fact, the history of the Japanese has no a clear relationship with the central story but, in return, it may be the most harrowing of all and that most engages the Viewer. The director himself should be aware of this when booking the wonderful flat end of the function.It also seems that Gael Garcia Bernal's character doesn't make much sense and almost all of their actions seem inexplicable. I fear that both the character and their strange decisions are not anything other than a resource writer helpings to complicate the situation.In the field of the anecdotal comment that some problem must have Arriaga with masturbation because both his script for "The 3 burials of Melquiades Estrada" as in this case, the masturbation precedes the tragedy. There is some psychologist in the room?Ultimately, the film is well directed, well performed and it is sufficiently entertaining, but is far from being the masterpiece many trumpets. One thing are the intentions or the message, and quite another the artistic result.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/48

Tito Chinchan

Thai Dragon

muchocine

Much dislocation for so little East

Titus Chinchan will be turning into a critic of truth? With this film happened a very rare thing, given that instead of going for the flow of the aborregada mass that we are going to the movies in droves, I am against. Will this be the signal that need the frames for giving me the opportunity I hope? No, no, I see signs.The film is about a kid who lives in a community that is dedicated to pray and to live with elephants. They are part of a few warriors whose mission is to protect the legs of the elephant of the King (I think that was in antiquity), therefore raising elephants for the King. Total, in a contest of real elephants, steal them the elephant and a raised, what triggers in a bunch of hosts continued until that ends the film.World Society of physiotherapists warns that the vision of this film can cause contusions and dislocations to thousands. Therefore, the film itself is a little truño. The argument is not bad, a Thai chases from his native country to Sydney a couple of elephants, massacring everyone who is on its way. Does not seem bad idea is not original, but look good. But he has criminal things, like for example the photo collage. And is it intercalates photographic scenes that do not come to story in the middle of the fighting, which descentra much. The development is a little absurd as it is advancing the film to overflow on most Supreme stupidity in the climax. And fights have totally lost the freshness that showed in Ong Bak. Now there are only dislocations of all joints of the body. A couple of dislocations, whatever, but it is what happens throughout the film luxando Lords elbows, knees, ankles, etc. And the end, the apotheosis of the nonsense and the dislocations, especially the attack of the elephant, which is for stalks are.In short, dislocations to gogo for a film of medium hair he aimed high and it Star cochambrosamente on the floor.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1222

Yojimbo

Hécuba, un sueño de pasión

muchocine

A more oriented mitómanos documentary which is welcome.

This documentary is directed by José Luis López - Linares (winner of the Goya Award to best picture last year) and Arantxa Aguirre. For 80 minutes is a review of what it means to be an actor for the actors themselves. Anecdotes, truths such as temples and contradictions are the ingredient in this documentary, whose name takes of Greek mythology.Do Maribel Verdú, Enriqueta Carballeira, Marta Fernández Muro, Carmen Maura, Berta Riaza, Carlos Hipólito, Javier and Pilar Bardem, and my beloved Pilar López de Ayala, etc? they compose the Group of interviewees have their feelings in the beginning, how is "infected" with the virus of the interpretation and how to live each day a profession whose difficulty little can externalize until that you put in your shoes.Although the documentary knows little and has a good rhythm, I miss less testimonies of other people working with actors. As they say, they need other professionals (screenwriter, director) more to develop their profession, by what would be good have interviewed some filmmaker who turns especially with actors such as Almodóvar, for instance.Especially fun is that contrast of views on the vanity, a sin which only denies Maribel Verdú Guild of actors; the same happens with schools of interpretation, each defended by serving for much and others just the opposite.One of the criticisms made by the actors of this documentary to the public, i.e., to all of us, is that we soon forget them. And special mention to those actors who are in the world of interpretation for years and now have little opportunities. And if they have, they are not have been big stars and currantes in his moment of glory.However this documentary directors have not had the idea of putting names to multiple photographs of actors that we inserted, as well as headline some of the cinematic sequences that we see.A documentary focused on the mitómanos and people who believe that she has been infected with the virus of the interpretation that people close to the audiovisual sector, which will be, in any case, welcome the collection of testimonies.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/569

José Córdoba

Camaron

muchocine

It is an episodic film because it summarizes more than forty years of life in less than two hours of footage, it sweetens the character, she takes pity on him, so it seems that company never anything bad.

The film narrates the life of shrimp from his childhood so far that returns in the United States.UU. After being diagnosed with terminal cancer who ended up killing. The film is therefore part of the biographical genre, "biopic" as the Americans call it. Unfortunately not leaving its standards, falling into each and every one of the endemic ills of the genre.It is an episodic film because it summarizes more than forty years of life in less than two hours of footage, it sweetens the character, she takes pity on him, so it seems that company never anything bad. Shrimp appears drawn as a genius martyr, unable to do any harm. In addition the film, does not show the artist's creative process, just gives some strokes, but too limited, especially taking into account that shrimp was a revolutionary in the world of Flamenco. The characters appear and disappear over the footage, case of the of Veronica Sanchez who plays his wife, a character which is introducio in the middle of the footage, showing us love and the subsequent wedding, and disappears until almost the end of the footage. The characters are one-dimensional, as an example the first girlfriend of shrimp, a girl that only thing we know is that it is capricious, nothing more. The film is also continually seasoned with songs of the artist, but not using them to advance the film, which would be logical, but as scenes of performances by what has just looking like a great playback, with many media, but a playback, especially screeching differences in the quality of the sound when the characters sing. Interpretive level the movie is very good, although I do not think it fair prizes granted Jaenada by your interpretation, because it remains an imitation, a camouflage. Carlos Latre makes it continuously, to another level of agreement, and why not give awards. The original soundtrack, which also has, is unobtrusive and demonstrates once again how very few Spanish directors know make use of the original soundtrack.As positive, discover the music of shrimp, will seek his musical experiments that seem interesting, but unfortunately have little reflection in the film, which basically focuses on his drug problem, although displays it without claw, so the hell crossed the singer appears too anti-aliasing. Finally, a curious detail, the shortage of Roma actors in the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2963

Rafa Delgado

Eragon

muchocine

Eliminating all the - aburridísimas - sub-plots of the book is clearly 'Eragon' is a clear and descaradísimo plagiarism of ' Star Wars: Episode IV - A new hope ' to the 'The Lord of the Rings'. If Fox is up!!! xDDD.

I have no idea how I have been able to endure such crappy.It is poorly written: there is no trace whatsoever of development, evolution, background, whatever!, the characters, and relations between them are overly forced, little credible. And the Assembly, horrifying and confusing, does not help anything. Not to mention hundreds of details and basic and vital aspects of the "original" argument of the book have jumped. In addition, leaves in evidence Paolini, that eliminating all - aburridísimas - sub-plots of the book is clearly 'Eragon' is a clear and descaradísimo plagiarism of ' Star Wars: Episode IV - A new hope ' to the 'The Lord of the Rings'. If Fox is up!!! xDDDGeorge Lucas will be in his underworld, because if not I can not I explain.I of fifteen year old also used to write stories or fantastic novelitas, which the vast majority of them were also copiatas or a medley of films which by then brought me crazy, fruit of that same movie buff enthusiasm. The difference between a server and Paolini is that he has had the value of publish it, and a few parents willing to do so.But hey, there is talk of the movie, not the book: shit. The only thing that saves is Saphira (which, by the way, why grow fast taaaaaan in only one scene?) (O.o) and Jeremy Irons. Yes, which found me Ben Kenobi. ahem!, Brom, fucking great. Very cool special effects also. and already is. Buff! And on top is a trilogy! They will have the courage (daring, rather) to make the three?I pray that not.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2476

Tyler

28 semanas después

muchocine

The photo is cruel, and the script is little well-meaning, which makes this movie a true madness of the macabre, with anthologies scenes, superb gratuitous violence and blood to GLUGs.

28 Days later was the film of "zombies" (but they were not) what version of Steven Spielberg's "The war of the worlds" film based on extraterrestrial invasions.Realism wholesomeness, echo from a point of view physical and primary, the movie took the issue seriously and was not taking the hair to the characters (which on the other hand does not have why be bad) If you imagine the months following the fine "The war of the worlds" also have an entertaining film. As well, "28 weeks later" mra as it would be London 28 weeks after the infection of the virus of the ira.The approach is simple and the movie too, and that is something of which you have to learn the film. simple. The movie is nearly perfect if it isn't already. I believe that it will become a classic as well as its predecessor. Not be if it is better or worse, and I don't care about, I think are pelisque debian exist, the perfect sequel and prequel to the perfect. I.e. it is not an unnecessary sequel to learn pasta that I gave the first, no, this movie had to happen. I wanted to know that it would happen after the first move.Danny Boyle decided not he directed, was too busy with "SUNSHINE", and he sought out someone saw the very correct "intact" and hit the touch to the compatriot our Juan Carlos Fresnadillo, that after several meetings he decided to access taking as a condition to tweak the script, Boyle was agree... and the thing started. Luckily.The movie has a fucking great rhythm with a morbid realization, necessary thing, the camera is infected, it's almost more from the point of view of the infection that's not infection. Influenced by the first but not like that, "28 weeks later" is more brutal, more violent, more kooky.It has little to do with horror from now, because it is not made as a horror movie, is more like a science fiction as possible. as a version to the beast of "JURASSIC Park".It is terror, but it doesn't. It has a touch almost of that film that is towards in the 1980s in Germany or Italy or USA. The MONDO film, extreme violence. The little care with what is said, the little responsibility with what he sees.Even though and that many smart people say, it has nothing to do with the war of Iraq. people see absurd Parallels. It is a movie, point. A fucking great movie that people who make films must learn.The secuenciacon that opens the movie is masterful, to learn from it, study it, watching. The rhythm is vibrating from the beginning, but has required moments of rest. rest not without tension, is as a bacterial film, as a biochemical weapon as that release in the movie. You feel great seeing it is not these films that leave you bad body. As part of the infection, the film is infection.The photo is cruel, and the script is little well-meaning, which makes this movie a true madness of the macabre, with anthologies scenes, superb gratuitous violence and blood to GLUGs.In addition to a nihilistic view of man as a waste of the Earth. actually, I think we should all die, diseases are actually necessary to put an end to part of humanity once. That one thinks when he sees the movie.A movie that is worth more than we think, a fucking great film and a flat finish that gives meaning to everything.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1618

Alvaro Oliva

Paris je t'aime

muchocine

In Paris, Je T´aime shows love in different ways, featuring and embodied by characters of different nationalities and ethnic groups. Ultimately the film is presented as an interesting option, which will satisfy the lovers of Paris and of the multiple stories.

Love has been a source of inspiration in all fields of art, numerous films do as the protagonist, and many people it craves and seeks idealizes.Paris is known as the city of love, and why they have decided to make a choral work in which eighteen directors show a district of the French capital, with love as a central axis of their stories. Movies with several stories have always I attracted, while it is true that a balance between all of them is very difficult, and only great managers, based on good scripts manage to achieve this.In Paris, Je T´Aime can find several small jewels, which are far above the rest of shorts that make up this journey through the city of the Eiffel Tower. In this small group can include the parts of Tom Tykwer ("Run, Lola, run", "perfume"), Alfonso Cuarón ("children of men"), Oliver Schmitz, the Coen brothers, Gus Van Sant and Wes Craven, although if I have to stay with one, starring Natalie Portman, takes the cake.Various stories about love, that will come to each differently, making some us closer than others. In Paris, Je T´aime shows us love in different ways, featuring and embodied by characters of different nationalities and ethnic groups, and between all them we find actors of the stature of Natalie Portman, Nick Nolte, Steve Buscemi, Bob Hoskins and Elijah Wood to name a few.Ultimately the film is presented as an interesting option, which will satisfy the lovers of Paris and of the multiple stories.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/392

Raccord

Clerks 2

muchocine

It is a film about topics so corny and trodden as the power of friendship and true love. Kevin has nothing new that bring in these aspects and the film as such becomes predictable and sweetened.

The action takes place ten years later the story told in Clerks. The grocery store where Dante and Randal working fire. They find a new job in a burger bar, but keep the same relaxed discipline of work. Dante is going to move to Florida with his girlfriend, so his friend Randal and Becky, his boss, decided to offer a last day of work will hardly forget.Kevin Smith seems to have only partly abandoned the thug and iconoclastic film of his youth and have been covered in more mature grounds, but without much imagination gala. The main plot tells of a love triangle and a few friends that are separated. What the hell? It is a film about topics so corny and trodden as the power of friendship and true love. Kevin has nothing new that bring in these aspects and the film as such becomes predictable and sweetened. Rosario Dawson sobreactúa throughout the film and Brian O?Halloran, the protagonist, plays a completely passive and tedious.The visual style of Kevin Smith has always been characterized by being very flat, and Clerks II proves again: there are more elaborate frames, many more close-ups and up some shots with a crane, but gives the feeling of being an aspect little care and your address has no personality. Instead, which has always stood out is the hilarious dialogues House brand, that in Clerks II there are some of the best examples of the career of the Director of New Jersey, combined with others that are not so.It is when they come into action side wonderful, with the essential Jay and silent Bob, where Clerks is really fun. Talks about the Lord of the rings or the Transformers, mingle with the Bible or hilarious arguments loudly on the racist insults. Although most amused me was the wonderful climax, drunkenness and sex between species included.A romantic comedy with touches of bright irreverence. Shares many traits with the films more pastry of Kevin Smith, with its beginnings, but entertaining anyway and the fans will enjoy it a lot.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3496

Ana Belén Pacheco

La camarera

muchocine

Delicious film more entertaining to most of the comedies in poster still being a romantic tragicomedy fledged and sweeter than Chocolat.

More than three months ago some friends began to eat me head on a movie I had seen so-called Waitress about a waitress who was adept at making cakes of different types depending on the inspiration of his own State of mind and putting the names more implausible and colorful of the experiences that made him create them.I recognize that when someone gets so much enthusiasm for good or for evil I'll stick with the mantra and now that the film is about to be released in Spain I have to indoctrinate readers about the need to visit the rooms to see this delicious sweeter than Chocolat film more entertaining to most of the comedies in poster still being a romantic trajicomedia in every rule.Jenna has a talent for his work which not only couple make "Feet" delicious if not for attracting the sympathy of all those who surround him. When he discovers she is pregnant realizes that her desire to flee her husband will be slightly disrupted. Trapped in a depressing marriage in a mediocre work and waiting for a child who doesn't want to gradually begins to understand that life can be accompanied by good things in the most unexpected places.Two of their successes to part of the script are its two protagonists will be the sea of television: Keri Russell (Felicity) and Natha Fillion (Firefly) whose chemistry and grace is indescribable. Sundace brought to the public of street thing which was logical but at the same time surprising that it's a modest, small but very meticulous and manufactured tape with much love. The recipe proposed by Adrienne Shelly (Director and screenwriter) had no waste. Written while he was in her eighth month of pregnancy the Director could thus giving life to a real, confusing, reckless character and in search of happiness that causes the empathy of any viewer instantly.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/436

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Desayuno en Plutón

muchocine

These two hours and little film know, let's see, what going you to do, little. I have no doubt that some festival with pretensions of self-promotion quickly given a stardom which does not deserve.

Neil Jordan is a competent director left convinced by the cinema of Hollywood (interview with the vampire), but that looks askance (with heart) to a film of roots, which some call copyright, although it would have such great fabric baste I marchamo.In this installment, he rummages in the Ireland that was born and, without shying away from political reflection, explores in the melodrama direct and unambiguous. As Jordan is not Douglas Sirk, the film stays halfway because he abused the clichés and hence in excess to the commonplace, to the dramatic space that the viewer has visited too many times.What we see is a Ireland of catalogue, who ruminates the provincial NAP of tranquillity. What threatens this brittle stillness is the character of Cillian Murphy, born man, but vocationally female, who prefers to be called kitten and it devotes his turbada life to find the mother she knew not. Time will be in this sentimental journey of lost identities for political Ireland (ANGER, found neighbors, street riots) also take his particular universe of topics.Everything is very fast and shines above the narrative set, a precise soundtrack and a sober acting composition which, although sobreactuado, Cillian Murphy, who remember Batman begins or in this monstrosity of abductions in the already outdated aircraft Wes Craven, give packaging a difficult character.Breakfast on Pluto is a melodrama with touches of comedy that we cannot call tragicomedy entirely as humour that presents is dark, sordid, sometimes. It has in music (I insist) an invaluable ally. Punk rock to Haëndel of the local folklore to disco music. Until Bryan Ferry has his perverse slip by more signs.It seems, to the way in which Tarantino modeled his scripts, Jordan would like to the turns of history to drink of the soundtrack of the movie. In fact, Patricia "Kitten" Braden, the character of Murphy, lives for those songs and guide its growth as a person throughout the footage.Came me to the memory the game of tears, better movie than this, signed also by Jordan. Both deal with cross-dressing. Both portray the terrorist violence. Here everything has been in a tone lower, effeminate to the sweet, but tender at times.Liam Neeson as selfless and courageous priest and Stephen Rea (a fixed Jordan) as the little traditional magician embroider, in my opinion, their characters. In short, the gentle reader has a mottled Behaviorism practical ration on the Bulletin Board and also, behold the absolute magic of cinema, a fun bit of film European, burdened by the traces of the American neighbour, so thief, so loved, so our.I have no doubt that some festival with pretensions of self-promotion quickly given a stardom which does not deserve, but nor criticaríamos in excess. There is so much trash and sold with so much complacency that these two hours and little film know, let's see, what going you to do, little. Tonight I will see with skirts and crazy. It has nothing to do with the writing, but I miss Jack Lemmon and Tony Curtis.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1422

Ramón Balcells

En busca de la felicidad

muchocine

The film is quite good, although it has a primary flaw: lacks it personality.

There are ways and ways, views and opinions. Gabriele Muccino, director of in search of happiness, doesn't seem to have, with this film, nor a way to clear or clear personal opinions. It is not that it is criticizing the film bad not. The film is quite good, although it has a primary flaw: lacks it personality. Perhaps others think that it may be one of the most poignant, tragic and personal films year-round. My opinion is as follows: This personality added provides, only, the star of the film (in all senses) that: Will Smith. So what here has its own life is the actor protagonist and not the film that appears. And then, I might add: in search of happiness is a correct history based on the same always, dream American, and interpretive weighing on it if he was he would not absolutely nothing. how many times have seen a film that addresses the theme of the American dream? Tens. Have we how many times have seen Will Smith doing a poignant performance? Never. So, in short, say that the film in question is quite irregular. A story everybody knows how (and not when) will end. And everyone I refer to all those that realize how simple it is the idea of Muccino. Is it that there is no original screenwriters in Hollywood, even though people say that not be them comes nothing but remakes? Speaking of writers, I think that it would have been great the election of Paul Haggis, simply because it would have provided her with force and originality to the story. It is also true that it is based on a real event (how not!) and that it is sometimes difficult to write a script about an event that already happened with innovative touches. But it is that here, except the magic square, there is not a single scene with innovative air. In short, that it could have benefited much more. Apart from this defect of originality, in search of happiness has other weak points: the film depicts certain aspects of a somewhat repetitive form, as for example, the scenes in which the protagonist loses the machine to sell.But after renumbered all of these negative features, I must admit that the film has also, quite a few positive things. First of all, and without exception, appoint Mr Will Smith, which gives us his best performance to date, endowed with wit, charisma, realism and emotion. Their appearances, which appear during the footage are always pleasant to see, like the dialogues that engaged, superbly written. So the weight of in search of happiness falls, undoubtedly, in the hands of this, now, his Excellency actor named Will Smith. The penalty is that the other side actors don't is look so much like him, although I have to say that their interpretations are, nor much less, bad. Both Tandie Newton, playing the role of mother endowed with an incredible drama (although to me, personally, I do not like as it is treated), as Jaden Smith, which he plays the son of Smith in the reality and fiction in an exceptional way, they offer us some brilliant performances, although a little scarce.In short, say that in search of happiness (The Pursuit of Happyness - what great detail the of the and!-) is a very correct film with overcoming oneself and the American dream as a strength within the theme, and an interpretative jewel: Will Smith. I don't know if it deserves the Oscar, but certainly the nomination Yes.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1531

Rafa Ferrer

300

muchocine

A masterpiece to be seen with all your senses.

Frank Miller was the recorded blood battle of Thermopylae and fire since his childhood saw the film "The lion of Sparta" (The 300 Spartans, 1962), which was one of his major influences of childhood, by what where deemed qualified to do so, decided to provide its own interpretation of that fact in a graphic novel that I recommend strongly reading. Zack Snyder, where is his second film after "Dawn of the dead" composed here his best work, leaving the same footprint left on a Robert Rodriguez with his "Sin City" server, translate, in real image and if a shred of problem the world of the comic (or graphic novel for scholars) to the big screenZack Snyder succeeds, leaving all the characters and the environment's role in a film difficult to forget, and that we like to watch over and over again.The tape never falters, conversely, the almost 2 hours of footage are an absolute pleasure for all the senses; mention separate interpretations of Gerard Butler (great as King Leonídas), the unknown bellisima Lena Headey, the always remembered as "Faramir" David Wenham, as well as Dominic West as the perfidious Theron, almost I forget "bellismo" Rodrigo Santoro with a make-up reminiscent of the mythical Ru-paul. In addition highlight the band Sonora of Tyler Bates, brilliant in its composition, although in some moments have epic sonorities reminiscent of "Gladiator" or "Trojan" and is the shadow of both tape is long for this kind of film.Digital effects on the tape are almost one character, since the film has been shot in BlueScreen, then adding the "yellow" brightness of the comic, as blood, that inhabits the screen giving that fictional and dramatic air that looks so well in the patido seats.In short, a masterpiece that it should look with all the senses.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2548

JLO

Ruby y Quentin

muchocine

Ruby & Quentin. They are the highlights of the film by its good chemistry together, but there really is much more to highlight.

Here is all very French. Director, actors, location, aires. Action comedy with the also French times, light years from the tax model Yankee for good and for evil.But this stereotype or cliché, also tells us everything you need to know. Francis Veber made your little pretentious and always friendly address with its characteristics of simplicity of script, mounting and thickness in general.Similar to his previous although less accomplishments effective - dinner of the fools, the closet - where everything runs without problem but with perhaps little emotion. Full of gags, as smart as slow, resembling the character performs Gérard Depardieu - Ruby-in a convincing performance and with the interpretative variety which we are accustomed in his choice of roles. Cannot be said the same of Jean Reno, which while is not bad seems trapped by the character of cold and lethal killer who made it famous in the perfect killer (Luc Besson, 1994), called lion and that still lurking it in all implementation to date with some slight variation (remember Ronin, Godzilla, etc). Also they are the highlights of the film by its good chemistry together, but there really is much more to highlight. To finish and if I may, here is the last common place: light, enjoyable entertainment. and forgettable in hours.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2058

Oscar Cantero

El camino de los ingleses

muchocine

A crude attempt to play the chord of the viewer using topics and arguments of an endiosado fool

The Camino de los ingleses is one of those movies that is called copyright, supposed that they transcend the purely aesthetic to attempt to explore the people inside and do emerge feelings that invite reflection. I have nothing against it.But if the product is a repellent petulance and an absolute lack of style that seeks only the self at the expense of ridicule somehow girl home and portray her in an insulting manner, then that Director bothers me. I am Andalusian and I can assure anyone that the social portrait that Banderas intends to do does not match what was or is Andalusia, and that this alleged sensitivity which tries to convey is that, a simple pretentious attempt of a man that constantly needs to demonstrate that it complies with all the stereotypes expected of a celebrity that combines the luxury and successful life with left-wing ideals that generally only remember with advertising campaign paid for by the Junta de Andalucía of medium.Although it is not my intention to judge him as a person, that among other things, I have nothing against him, but it bothers me that it is used in a crude manner the feel of a quite punished people already by hurtful stereotypes. If above becomes a slow, dull chestnut and at times grotesque, even worse.I expected more of all the senses, as director and Andalusian flags. Although if you look at his career, nor should be surprised that the result has been this monstrosity.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4178

Hombre Lobo

Halloween El Origen

muchocine

The failures and successes of the remake of Zombie are respectively, due to their desire to pay homage to one of his idols and the use of an employment history for further digging in his personal aesthetic.

These hours will not be anyone who has not already come to Halloween (2007) by Rob Zombie, one of the most eagerly awaited films of 2007 (at least of the visitors of this page) and finally finished by brand new in Spain earlier this year. Treatment that this director has given to one of the most celebrated films of John Carpenter has proven to be fairly decent, although well below what he achieved with his two previous films. The failures and successes of the remake of Zombie are respectively, due to their desire to pay homage to one of his idols and the use of an employment history for further digging in his personal aesthetic.Because the best this new Halloween, is undoubtedly the first half, in which Rob Zombie used the story of the origins of Michael Myers and his insane psychopath to write another chapter in this great Chronicle of the white trash that already had outlined with their previous tapes. It certainly uses a lot of topics (abusive stepfather, unable to mother and an oppressive atmosphere full of violence and humiliation), but these never seemed exaggerated or explotativos; on the contrary, they are perfectly consistent with the thematic universe of the director, stressing the image of this androgynous child whose pleasure in the suffering of others is the only way of escape to a reality in which he is always the weakest and fool them that surround him. From there the film evolves to narrative pulse that occurs between Michael and Sam Loomis psychiatrist (character who is here much better used and developed in the original film), a man who, like the public, seek to understand the reasons for the behavior of Michael and what hides behind their willingness to kill. With the passing of the years this test be a sterile search, and after escape from the asylum where have locked you (in a very unpleasant sequence even by the standards of Rob Zombie), Michael returns to its former suburb of Haddonfeld to sow death among its inhabitants.In this second half is where the Zombie film loses much of its strength; as he has said on countless occasions, does not this second half of Halloween but summarize the original film except for slight differences (among them a greater number of casualties), with what, one might ask what has become of the delicate introspective look which the director had shown us. At the end, as Sam Loomis discovers, it is that the madness of Michael Myers has no explanation beyond violence as a unique expression of emotionality. But here the director has sinned a great excess, because I don't think they are necessary two hours of film to reach this conclusion. However, despite these flaws, should remove the hat before the way as Rob Zombie has dissected the slasher genre stripping completely and offering its most basic aspects to the extent that the same killer takes off voluntarily the mask to show veneration towards the final girl facing the. Also the relationship with sex typical of these masked psychopaths here has its explanation: this film girls use their sexuality as an element of humiliation and ridicule, starting with the unbearable sister of Michael and ending with the no less nerve-wracking friends of Laurie Strode. The interesting thing is that, with all this, Rob Zombie is not doing a tribute to the "myth" of Michael Myers, but on the contrary: it is destroying, in the same way that a child destroys a clock that opens to see how it works. This is the long prologue explícativo killing machine and the fact that, unlike the Carpenter film, this version not leaves open the possibility of a sequel (a key detail that the difference of almost all the rest of the genre). At the end, the Charter of love that Rob Zombie and his friends (is impressive the amount of luminaries of the terror and the B series walk through this film) have written to the original work of JC is burdened by excessive footage and also excessive reverence to the master (not only in what refers to the second half but also to the use of the original theme song)(, which here seem to not fit too well), but is without doubt one of those good remakes, one that is worth see to appreciate the work of someone who has not only been Halloween, but that it also understood. As always, there will be discrepancies in the final result, but the difference is that here appreciates the tone of a true artist.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1441

Tito Chinchan

Pulse

muchocine

American horror film Japanese-style on a virús which seeks to steal the life of human beings to thus get one of their own. Much fear does not give, but the idea can leave you thinking awhile.

I'm going to venture me with this movie, given that all indications are that it is a remake of another Japanese who had no great fame in the West and a clever Director has decided to bring her here. Aesthetics and the theme is 100% Japanese, with those bad white face that you suck the blood. By the way, has who copied whom? The bad characters is equal to the Dementors from Harry Potter.La film is about a group of kids, of those bodies ten, with extensive knowledge of computer science. Total, one of them, who knows more is attacked by a nosequé makes that it will be putting purple until appears his girlfriend and this commits suicide. And the thing continues, with the TV warning of a new virus that is transmitted by the computer, the palm and even toasters. And coming to the end is not God, that this should be a criticism of the society in which we live, where lost humanism of frias relations towards personal and impersonal relationships of the computer. Or I know I know, I learned well.Nothing, this is a hell. They say it is a film of fear, but gives three scares predecidos coming from a Chan-Chan that takes away the fear. Well, I have to admit that if I am in the first scene I shit there same, but since the seat did not happen from a mere "sustito Uy". The plot is curious, with a virus that travels by computers and that goes out to steal the life has no human beings. So, until I would even say I have a Matrix touch. The actors are very well see, but do not understand how they do not go naked unnecessary or similar. Actors are not very much, I do not vibrate, of course.In short, film america of terror to the Japanese style on a virús which seeks to steal the life of human beings for this way to get one of their own. Much fear does not give, but the idea can leave you thinking awhile.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2297

Berto

Habitación sin salida

muchocine

It serves to hang out if you are able to accept the countless holes in the script, but it does not stand a minimally serious analysis. Norman Bates would be the hands to the head.

This seems to the ugly truth is putting out House in USAmérica. You trying to get you by those of eight-lane highways, or the first diversion you take you are part of the menu of Caradecuero. And this is to say nothing of the motels road, shelter (and often grave) of unwary travelers. Then the couple in divorce proceedings formed by David Fox (Luke Wilson) and Amy (Kate Beckinsale), does not seem to take into account the wisdom that is reflected in the film, because they not only get a strange desert road, and let a stranger makes them a few odd in the engine, but they end up spending the night in a seedy Highway motel run by Mason (Frank Whaley) in which are the only guestswhich they discover when they see a few tapes in his room where there are recorded torture and murders committed in that room. What follows varies a bit between the "run, run, that you get", and "now you see me, now I don't, and you will see the leap that you paste when it appears". Curious thing about this case is that the players are not completely stupid (well, she did until near the end), although the real merit is the erratic behavior of the bad turn, that suggests if the Marx Brothers are not hide under the mask. The best of the movie the claustrophobic atmosphere of the room is enhanced thanks to the fixed cameras installed in it, although as too much imagination would require to develop an hour and a half movie in a closed room, soon the thing becomes a slasher of the corrientitos. Actors chillan and bleed as it is assumed that they should do so, and Luke Wilson, also has the advantage of not being his brother Owen, what makes it infinitely more bearable than the colleague from raids of Ben Stiller. Is Beckinsale doubt whether is a great actress, or is that she has a face of disgust of itself, but I tend towards the latter. It serves to hang out if you are able to accept the countless holes in the script, but it does not stand a minimally serious analysis. Norman Bates would be the hands to the head.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/626

José A. Peig

Hijos de los hombres

muchocine

Do often gives the impression of not going beyond a visual spectacle, which comes to be a plagiarism of the so-called style - in many sequences-? hiper-realista? executed by Spielberg.

When the letters of the conclusion are and you you have to swallow so many images on characters in chaotic circumstances created by human violence in the near future - and eerily similar to the immediate present - could not fit another way than the instinct of praise addressed to this filmmaker named Alfonso Cuarón, who has already demonstrated a striking style visual in their great contribution to the saga of Harry Potter.Si started out thereall goes well. We have an overwhelming visual recreation of an apocalyptic world that justifies himself and becomes credible almost from the first minutes of the narration without offering an explanatory foreword, on the basis of a table in which the protagonist is situated in the Centre of a group of people referred to in the television the news concerning the death of the youngest of the humanclosing a cycle and increase the collective depression of a world trapped in his absence of expectations for posterity.That same character will die before the new seed, opening the way to hope, and comes to the storyline that leads us along the journey, used effectively, and denotes the good work in the structure by the director and his writers. Without a doubt, the aesthetic embodiment, the creation of an apocalyptic atmosphere, and the varied assortment of human profiles that guarantee a minimum poetic breath to a technically impeccable product, but that too often gives the impression not to go beyond a visual spectacle, which comes to be a plagiarism of the style called "hiper-realista" executed by Spielberg with all kinds of means and tricks of artillery in "Saving private Ryan" - in many sequences.The strength at the visual level and honesty in the development of the idea are notable, certainly, but at the end is an aftertaste to emptiness, because as indicated above: there is something else in this film other than an overwhelming staging?. In the stratum of the characters and the relationships between them, as already has been mentioned before, there is variety in the type of characters but the fact is that the story delves not none of them nor ends curdling the appropriate epic and dramatic tone in any of the situations developed (peca to omit the explanation of some facts and motivations)(for example, the viewer never gets to know the meaning of "human project," the ultimate goal of the adventure). It would seem that the representation of the different profiles is credible and works as idea of hitch a narrative choral on chaos lived in a community who are fighting for the survival of civilization or the ideal individuals, but the gaze of Cuarón on this set is too warm, not stressed enough the beat that whole dramatic human in a story about groups human being discussed between the fightthe inevitable defeat in appearance and the hope represented by elegiac tone and its symbolic, the cries of the baby for a few moments, manages to silence screams and bombs which is possibly the most substantial scene.Conclusion, if "Children of men" has failed to be a great movie is by the coldness and the warmth with which deals with the human drama of Fund, despite its excellent virtues in the technical realization.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4321

Alvaro Oliva

Monstruoso

muchocine

To sum up?Monstrous? includes the stories always but told otherwise, and time, this makes it a novelty.

J.J. Abrams returns to give us shows his talent and great business vision is, which is that "Cloverfield", here translated as "Monstruoso", tells the story of always but in a "different" way, or at least not so common.The shadow of "The Blair Witch project" continues to bite, and recently what we have seen in "Rec", and I guess that we will see "Quarentine" (the remake of it). Well, taking such a scheme, "Monstrous" presents us with a group of friends and how they live a creature attack to New York City, specifically in Manhattan. All told from the subjective point of them, a video camera will be who let us them see what is happening.The first moments of the film, after the first tremor, have a great realism, which relies on the idea that are having a new terrorist attack, and clear, that we can stay away, but the protagonists live very close to ground zero of the 11-S, so they have that feeling very present.In addition to the aforementioned film, we can find references to "28 weeks later", "Godzilla" and "The Host". In the acting section, Matt Reeves (Felicity) leads to unknown faces, which help to give more credibility to the story.Good sound, and special effects support and sustain this story, in which there is also time for the courage and love. The antagonist of the story, the Monster does not appear clearly, something that helps create more suspense and provokes the curiosity of the Viewer. Also the style and the chosen point of view make that we can stay eager to further explanation, but what is this proposal, which is not counted in the traditional way, and if you have seen "The Blair Witch Project", you can get an idea of what you're going to find you. In short, "Monstrous" encompasses the stories always but told otherwise, and time, this makes it a novelty.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2808

El vengador toxico

Ratatouille

muchocine

He is not a film of laughter as it could have been Shrek, but of a kind comedy with funny moments. A chapeau to Pixar by this wonder.

Pixar returns to the attack after the small fiasco that turned out to be Cars (in comparison with the previous wonders of the House). As in this type of movies one tends to compare them with previous ones, I will say that in my place the masterpiece from Pixar is finding Nemo. And in this case I must say that they have managed to return to the level of that film.In every Pixar movie you expect the best of animation by computer (remains ahead of others) and it could not be less. Although I have the impression that not give everything they can about as realism to continue looking like a cartoon. Because the scenes that stand out as the eddies in the sewer or rain on the cobblestones of Paris, seem so real? that in the end have been a stamp indicating that real images have not been used or "capture of movement". It is impressive in the three years that have passed since Nemo as the realism of the water has increased so much.But let the technical aspects, which have continued to be bright in the Incredibles and Cars on the side. Always gives me bad spine when an animated film is announced through the stars appearing as actors/dubbers, as if they are not delivering anything (is not always so, eye). And as usual, Pixar has not done, despite having big players in English, such as Ian Holm, or Peter or?Toole (okay, are not stars).The script is a very clever piece that, like Nemo (since I know I repeat myself) animals interacting with humans, but do not speak, but that humans treat them as it would be usual, until the protagonist Gets a communication.Remy is a rat of field that has a delicate sense of taste and smell. This makes that the garbage sifted his father and other family (the clan) is very unsatisfactory. Therefore it is sometimes slips into the kitchen of the farm where can give free rein to your desires, and there met the greatest chef of France, the great Gusteau recipes. Do all goes well until one day?.I love how it handles the communication between humans and rats. Humans see them as disgusting vermin that are, pursue them, seek to kill them? only Remy (that so it have drawn blue) will succeed in entering the world of haute cuisine.He is not a film of laughter as it could have been Shrek, but of a kind comedy with funny moments (umpteenth reference to Nemo), which are the typical characters Jesters, embittered bad (the chef Skinner and the critic Ego), and other conventions of the genre. But do not believe in any case adults do they heavy or they think that "this already I've seen". A chapeau to Pixar by this wonder.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3239

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Killing America

muchocine

Disturbed vision of America deep, not overly inspired, but sincere. PECA of predictable, gets carried away by reasoning already learned in lots of similar tapes. Video store resource for afternoon rain at home. This is already something.

A desastrada children can mark a whole life. Said it Sigmund Freud and tried it in own meat Maculey Culkin and Drew Barrymore, Joselito and a friend of mine that still, to its thirty and peak years has not seen the light of wisdom and the sparkling of the sanity bombillitas. Killing America rests his disturbed breath on this evidence of manual of psychology. The story of the two brothers that fatigue secondary roads with the perseverance of the greedy psychopath of corpses is contaminated in a history of one nihilistic sediment more than evident, but we are not dealing with any Treaty of human behavior or Douglas Sirk is behind the camera. These times of relative and moral distress consent revisions of classic patterns atufadas by simple, obvious and legitimate way of doing box while shocked staff. I doubt very much that Killing America is a profitable experiment. It is a temperamental movie road, a telefilm of programmable quality at night, safe from mojigatas minds or spirits of weak Constitution, and not because the guts of their content offends or enroll with effrontery Al Gore so in fashion but because they are taken for granted by known for accepted, ways of living and behaviour are not sufficiently justified. The violence that the brothers protagonists not argues with enough weight. The flood of dead that are entailed footage unsettles at a point in which already not us affects another body or the way the murderers get rid of evidence and the feeling of guilt. There. Lasts, to their benefit, little: seventy minutes well taken. Tires against the stubborn collection of disasters that perlan those (few) minutes. The pilgrimage towards the nirvana of redemption has, in the final stretch, an ethereal descent, a foray into the epidermis of love, but until love acquires macabre letters and we are witnessing between the shock and the indifference, equally, the spectacle made in USA of the decline of their empire. Or is not what the title alludes? Them have not very clear: seems to me that stays one always halfway. With desire of seeing more and eager of not that this hint of deliberately avant-garde film ends, stop the player (Yes, has been already taken domestic meeting of video store) and go into the street to walk.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1846

Jesus Lens

Tu la letra, yo la música

muchocine

A movie, in the end, as well-intentioned as suavona, innocent, aseptic and calm. A film that is not boring, sees without displeasure and forgotten two minutes out of the film.

Hugh Grant, he joked in the presentation of this film before the media, about his role in it: "It was a little drunk when I accepted." Do not know what's true and what of exaggerated in such an assertion, but the truth is that the good of Hugh has gone le a couple in interpreting that former star 1980s poppie coming unless.Hairstyles, the outfits, the dances and the cutrez of his artistic life in the 21st century are more pathetic and endearing at the same time we have seen on a cinema screen in recent years.The truth is that only therefore by the character of Grant, it is worth seeing the film. For this reason. and for little more. The crazy character of Drew Barrymore, in the line of the great romantic destroyers in the history of cinema, beasts of my girl and surroundings, adds nothing new to a type of character more trite and sobado than the bust of Ava Gardner. The character of the sister of Drew, however, is of the most funny thing, so female dominatrix crazy hysterical fan.History and the plot, as well built as light in his criticism of the great divas of music today, Cristinas Aguileras and Shakiras are mostly white glove: a musician without inspiration and any girl who passed by there and helps you to compose a song for the great Star of the moment: Cora, which conveniently, destroy her looking for immediate success and the recognition of some fans thatfrom music, they just want to see dance star.And arises the spark between the musician and the girl, and they enchant, and fall in love and. good, I believe that any reader would be able, without having seen the film, anticipate everything what will happen until that come the opening credits. Since then, if the reader usually travels by bus, already you know more than very well what awaits you with this "you the letter y yo music", a perfect example of cinema to see on a plane, or at home, a winter Sunday afternoon.Film soft, without edges causing laughter with some acidic of the Hugh Grant character replicas and smile with his light criticism of the current model of culture of the show in which we operate, including Affairs-basurera. I've missed, that Yes, some shots outside more of New York and its streets and cafes, Madison Square Garden and others. Too little budget?A movie, in the end, as well-intentioned as suavona, innocent, aseptic and calm. A film that is not boring, sees without displeasure and forgotten two minutes out of the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/145

David

Tirante el blanco

muchocine

The only good thing is what dominates this director: nude scenes

Last night went to the cinema to see the movie of strained the white (Tirant the Blanc) of Vicente Aranda. I had to go to the Yelmo Cineplex cinemas, therefore in the Abaco not was, so I went to the competition lol. Truth I expected much more of that movie, only with the beginning already left me with bad taste in the mouth, as the only good thing is always that dominates this director: the scenes of nudity.A start with anticipation for the film and a decor that noticed that it was decorated, pure and hard, little care that aspect. later battles them, bad, very bad. I expected more action on them and only saw carnage of horses (blood rain) and four espadazos that seemed school teach you when to cross swords and give mandobles. Very terrible truth, little well-kept battles.The more characteristic, see Rafael Amargo as great Turkish Chief, the truth is that when I saw him, he had a good resemblance, but only fit it in that gave me that you marked some dance as a great dancer that is.Special mention to Victoria Abril, well she online of his roles, teaches everything, starts with a recital of mat for our strained and later the breasts and to end up naked fully permissible doubt is its strong .esas scenes exploits them as nadie.ya is public encasillada.el knows and says it.Conclusion say there is a scene of the film I was marked. to not reveal the film will tell you not details but know is known to be something erotic. the scene where all help Tirant the Blanc to "sex" (that I think is the word that defines that scene) prevented their legs are broken, brought in camilla, turned...carried the Princess Carmesina, in missionary position with a maid, acting mamporrera and all pushing the Tirantlo towards inside and out so that you can desvirgar to the sweet Carmesina full of lust. do not give more details of why you reach this limit, because it only much of the film and although something is mala.bueno honestly, pretty bad, you laugh situations, some very shocking and hilarious.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1258

Yojimbo

Cineastas contra magnates

muchocine

The director becomes a collection of United anédoctas counted horns a documentary with a very interesting topic.

One of the Spanish documentary desire to see was filmmakers against magnates, whose inmemorizable name website, discovers us that he is a part of 2 documentaries on the same subject. The other: filmmakers in action."Rehearsal" deals with the treatment of films once completed. A lesson superbly documented on various image formats, the barrabasadas made in screening both in film and television, some technical customs harmful to the artistic health of the film as the colored films, etc? In this section do not have any hits, and very instructive for those who want to know something more of the technical aspect of cinema.However the supine clumsiness of the director makes a documentary with a very interesting topic in a collection of rare United anédoctas to horns, as if write on their blog every 15 days and then put all the post row to make a book. Suddenly, jump to the heart of the documentary: the lack of respect for the work of the director in a film. And that's when it becomes a boring, redundant and radical pastiche. And that which only lasts and a half, but boring to the stones.This sectarian documentary to the core not only focuses on the director as a single, all-powerful God of the film, but that producers do not exist, and if there are Americans, with much money and eager to destroy the way most ruin movies. The impressive collection of testimonies and interviews which brings together this long does Stanley Donen, Berlanga, Woody Allen, John Houston (Burt Lancaster?) not only is not an attractive, but that the director, Carlos Benpar, manages to turn them into a slab: don't know the substance of speech of any edit. It seems that he wants to boast of having achieved record such illustrious guests, but only reveals his clumsiness as director to not know what to choose fragments. That Yes, the most delirious is José María Nunes, a genuine radical madman.It also has "patches" of fiction who try to illustrate the concept of "the artist is everything and all it does is untouchable". In short, a plea against the industry, in favour of the cinema, of the conservation of the creative purity but it is a product of dishonest and inconsistent to 100%, that if we are going to talk about purity, I do not understand why to the gorgeous storyteller, Marta Belmonte (best film), the bends when the rest of speakers busts so horrifyingly symphonies them. Infumable. The director of "this" is quite clear: the head is Dios.Y because only the title betrays its intention: filmmakers (intention of magnificence) against Magnates (bad bad bad).I (we) however wonder: who needs more who: filmmaker mogul or Tycoon filmmaker?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2861

Kiko de España

La Jungla 4.0

muchocine

Boring, long and with a villain that makes McClane looks like history, the jungle hijoputa 4th is the worst possible sequel.

About cyberterrorists attack EEU and U and the Government sends a COP to look for a hacker. From there they await us cent thirty minutes of film blue, and that's because Len Wiseman makes blue films. And boring.If the movie entitled Total chaos and the COP responded to the name of Harry Jones would approve it far-fetched to have a couple of molona action scenes. It would probably also have blood. But not. The movie is titled the jungle 4.0 and the madero is John McClane. And that get me to the balls.Boring, lengthy (one minute longer than the first, but you know what I'm saying, right?) and a villain that makes McClane looks like history, the jungle hijoputa 4th is the worst possible sequel, adds absolutely nothing and what is worse, is loaded the hallmarks of the series.McClane seems Jeff Talley and does not carry straps and Yes t-shirt, Talley is by the hair. We moved from Sam Zeus Jackson to Justin Long, fails to plug into the character and worst of all comes with action: in the jungle 1 him bursting head to Mr Takagi in the meeting room; in the second part McClane took a look at CigarroPuro's Porky's and the third they start an uncle in half etc.There are blood if any character is cut and point. And it has thousand dead times. And spare you half an hour. And it's boring.Len Wiseman is the guy who directed Underworld and shows it in a couple of scenes, that here there is peña flying. It is the disappointment of the season and only the good a (forced) sentence which would be the best COP in the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3007

James Wallestein

Halloween El Origen

muchocine

The film knows on numerous occasions to do tribute to the John Carpenter film and the screenplay, making numerous winks, and even adapting their plot in a very similar and reliable way. I take my hat off to this phenomenal and intense work of Rob Zombie.

I know some I wil by fingers fat of the feet of the top of a mast of a boat verlero. But is what I say and I say why, and more taking into account that I am a fan of John Carpenter, of his entire champion which I venero and his unforgettable night of Halloween that I've seen countless times, but this precula-remake is higher without a doubt to the original. For me the histrionic director Rob Zombie, eccentric and wild like few others, has reached a point of maturity and talent already very clear, forgetting their previous films mix of theatre, antics and gore. Take charge of a film as the night of Halloween was not feat. We are talking about a classic among the classics between modern horror movies, so having so many fans and fans, after 29 years garnering admiration, worshipers and critical love, reinventing the franchise, and most classic which originated was not easy. Rob Zombie focused this remake raised a number of very interesting questions posed by the original. What can encourage a child to kill his sister? Because that is what we see in the original film. In the remake, she kills sister, her boyfriend and his father. Michael Myers is a young girl who lives in a home broken, dysfunctional, full of misery, insults, violence, humiliation and pain. The child does not much shelter at school where is mistreated and persecuted by abusive partners. Michael explodes in this hell in which they live thousands of people to their regret, and unfold your mind. He first meets his frustration killing animals, something that relaxes you. These attacks of violence make her feel better. Why then he kills a fellow of the College brutally in a clearing in a forest to sticks. Then massacred anyone there in his house, but it leaves to the baby alive. We see that Michael is not a nutty narcoticized or silent. It is a sensitive child, with the mind broken and very bitter. He is then arrested by the police. Admitted to a psychiatric centre. How a child was going to be a lot of years silent and staring out a window?This prequel tells us of a paterno-filial relationship between Dr. Loomis and Michael. The doctor understands that Michael apparently is a good child, kind-hearted and until something shy. But know that it contains a dark and wild side that splits in two to be a mask, which is its dark, uncontrollable and homicidal side. The mother of Michael is next to the child trying to help you. But after a visit session child brutally attack a nurse, degollando her. After that tragedy and four deaths, Michael Myers is declared a high risk. The mother looks like the brain of the child has been bursting, has burned it a fuse, possessed by the dark side, and then enters in a State of shock, staying silent and until something stunned. The broken mother by family tragedy and his life commits suicide at home hitting a shot. The child grows and becomes a bicharraco which has not entered by a door, played by actor Tyler Mane, a wrestler in lucha libre, of 2.03 metres in height. And here begins the film the night of Halloween, taking about an hour to tell us why Michael Myers is the monster that is, their motivations and why massacred his family. Just in the middle of the film begins the film by John Carpenter, who of course, with the current cinematic language the duration of the original film, 91 meters, would be either very long or very slowly, by hand is counted as the stories are now and that means greater pace and plot density. Why the second half of Halloween is quite rightly condense all the old film by John Carpenter. At that point I did not destriparé too many things that I have uncovered many on the first hour of film, but I will say that it is excellent and vibrant. Michael Myers is a homicidal and almost mythological Monster at the height of the original, leaving all their past incarnations in a lot of sequelae of diverse luck in the shit. The film knows on numerous occasions to do tribute to the John Carpenter film and the screenplay, making numerous winks, and even adapting their plot in a very similar and reliable way, but knows also take their points of departure and originality not clashing, to give an interest added to the film. The film has many impressive moments. The tension is bestial and murders are very realistic and hard. The murder of the child are chilling. Wayne Toth make-ups are impressive. Is that John Carpenter film is elegant and mysterious, and that blood (despite several deaths) is conspicuous by its absence. But this remake - prequel has notable amount of gore and visual hardness, but I think that they are adequate. The film is raised as a trilogy if this succeeds, by which all actors have signed by three films in their contracts. Hopefully Rob Zombie makes them all and have the level of quality of this powerful film that to me I loved during their nearly two-hour. A new modern classic without a doubt. Despite having been hacked by internet you are having some excellent collections in the USA, the film deserve without doubt. I take my hat off to this phenomenal and intense work of Rob Zombie. Not you the Miss!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4174

Heitor Pan

Hacia rutas salvajes

muchocine

In addition to music and careful photography of the film, notes in a resounding manner main actor Emile Hirsch, that bears the weight of the film magnificent way, makes us see life in a way much more clean and private prejudices.

I imagine Sean Penn as a visceral kind that is guided by emotions rather than the head. A man that acts by impulses, able to embark on any adventure if you it is filled with truth. So imagine as well by his way of acting, put on paper, often offering heartfelt, deep and extreme interpretations by its ability to transform, by his eyes halfway between the sadness of who has seen many things and the determination of who does not stop at nothing or to anyone.Also it gives me that image in his role as director, just embarking on those projects that falls, leading to the screen stories with which it identifies and choosing actors representing how clear his alter ego on the screen. It happened with the obsessed detective, played by Jack Nicholson in "The oath" and the same here, with the younger Emile Hirsch, in the evocative and ecological "towards wild"routes.Christopher McCandless is a young intelligent and bounced with the society in which he lives. Did not understand their parents, a couple obsessed with money and labour that are barely supported each other and also includes a system that cancels out the individuality and rewards the materialism. His rooted idealism will take you to change its entry into the University for the start of an internal search, breaking any tie of social conformism. To do so, donate practically all of its studies to an NGO Fund and decided, begins a journey that will try to survive on its own in the countryside.As I said at the beginning, the film shows that Sean Penn is in love with the story and, paradoxically, this fact lastra narration at certain times in a clear way. Penn tries to reach the Viewer as much information as possible, leaving nothing in the pipeline, adding to their images of an alive nature and wild and the adventures of the protagonist, a voiceover with the thoughts of Christopher and his sister that, in my view, slows down the narrative, becoming her at times too guided. His loyalty to the original novel prevents you from leaving the global vision in the hands of simple images and own intuition of the spectator, wanting to take it by the mental path that he himself had drawn up at the reading.At other times, however, the film runs fluid mode and then is when the director shows its full potential, in these passages in which simply leaves the camera observed the protagonist in his quest, without trying to influence or indoctrinate. In those moments in which words are not needed, it dazzles a careful soundtrack with the worn and powerful voice of Eddie irons, leader of the rock band Pearl Jam and composer of some topics in perfect harmony with the spirit of the film.In addition to music and careful photography of the film, notes in a resounding manner main actor Emile Hirsch, that bears the weight of the film so magnificent, portraying a character charismatic and charming, a type without evil makes us see life in a way much more clean and private prejudices.Also drew me attention to the sensual role of Kristen Stewart, the girl who we saw pass them straws with Jodie Foster in "Panic room", which has grown to become a teenager with a look of serene wild perversity.To conclude, in its two hours and twenty of footage, "towards wild routes" get the purpose of thinking to the public what are things that are worthwhile in a life that we we're losing sensations as atavistic as necessary. Although maybe that we also thought in less time.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1326

Francisco Bellón

Miguel y William

muchocine

Ines Paris paid with Miguel and William profound tribute to the two largest geniuses of world literature.

The comedy has always been one of the most cultivated in the Spanish film genres, and indeed, some of the greatest works of our cinematography are comedies. Through them, many of the larger Spanish filmmakers have developed their ingenuity, some dodging censorship under the innocence of laughter.However, in recent years, comedy is a rare bird in the national scene, with the exception the uncouth and rude examples that predominate in the genus worldwide. Daniela Fejerman and Inés Paris have been responsible for two of the best comic works of recent years, and now comes the first work solo of one of them, Agnes Paris. First and foremost, Agnes Paris honors with Miguel and William a deep two elders geniuses of world literature, two privileged minds of the Siglo de Oro: Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra and William Shakespeare. It does imagining a hypothetical encounter between the two, at the beginning of the 16th century, I find that it will be possible thanks to Eleanor (Elena Anaya), daughter of a wealthy merchant, looking for an author to write a work for her and thus to fulfill his wish of becoming an actress. Despite the general tone of comedy which has Michael and William, Inés Paris is also a portrait of the Castilla grim and dominated by religion and superstition, where women were regarded as second-class citizens; In short, an outline of that full of misgivings newly unified Kingdom with Aragon, the embryo of the Spain that we know today. In this aspect, is inevitable comparison with some great Super production era, located a century later in time, and let to the understanding of each what movie comes out victorious in the lid. Turning to the tape, it's a relative comedy, with some very humorous moments, although it is those who are with a permanent smile, sometimes bittersweet. Miguel and William is a proposed fresh and different from the typical stories prefabricated about great authors of that Hollywood cinema era we used to give. The script is flexible and original, and one of their greatest strengths are constant references to the not yet written works of the two literary geniuses. The film has good pace, as it requires a comedy, and its precise footage makes that not become heavy at any time. The technical aspects are very careful, among which highlights a great art direction, which makes credible historical reenactment. Between an excellent cast (what about José María Pou or Geraldine Chaplin), highlights a radiant, fresh and fun Elena Anaya, confirming his great interpretive skills, and Juan Luis Galiardo, than anything more come fills the screen, and is impossible to imagine someone more in the skin of the one-armed man of Lepanto. It also draws attention to Carolina Lapausa, young actress tanned in the theatre which will give much to talk about in the future. Miguel and William is an entertaining film, that will make the viewer have a very nice time, but that above all serves as a great tribute to two geniuses who, coincidentally, died the same day of the same month, in the same year. And as I wrote one of them, well is it just well.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/767

Silvia Giner

Saw 3

muchocine

New torture and new aparatejos, complicated and repulsive at the same time with the scoop to meet first hand the authentic workshop of creation of puzzle.

In the same line as the previous ones, this 3rd part of the series, which began as a revelation of the genre of psychological terror, now discover us a possible end for some, and a window on another new sequel for others.Again puzzle shows us the side more psychopath of his mind, this time more predictable than previously, although until the end does not reveal its true intention.Perhaps this installment is the weaker of the three, but not why it free of extreme moments in the purest style saw and touching as not that point gore who has served as inspiration to other titles such as Hostel (which incidentally released soon its 2nd part).Ay recognize that strong point, met it with the first installment and to overcome that feeling after seeing the movie, it was very difficult. I Saw has marked a way of doing a mass product, a product that is sold and bought with a success which could not be repeated if a 4th sequel of al gore.If you liked the previous ones, going to leave happy to see this film, but not surprised. The valuation in general is good but not excellent as it was the case in the first film. The actors are very but very credible and scenarios are very curious. New torture and new aparatejos, complicated and repulsive at the same time with the scoop to meet first hand the authentic workshop of creation of puzzle.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3170

Andrés Pons

El Orfanato

muchocine

A mixture of Poltergueist, the end of the ladder, suspense or the recent the other, terror of classical which is technically overwhelming in all its aspects, but the script is known memory.

A debutante whose limited experience is some video clips for artists of middling type camela, not dream never have so many means for a debut.Thanks to Guillermo del toro who lives his best time after the overwhelming success of the laberinto del fauno young Bayonne was a unique opportunity.Began to advertise the film as if it were the panacea of contemporary horror, it was said that in dogs I boot no less than ten minutes of applause. It starts to comment on possible nominations for the Academy Awards. Even is already chosen by the Spanish Academy to compete for them for the award for best foreign language film.With so much criticism over overwhelmed one must be aimed at the film hungry discover a monumental work or a new genius of the genus.What particularly just discovered is that Marketing managers are the real geniuses because the orphanage is only one film of haunted houses.A mixture of POLSTERGUEIST, the end of the ladder, suspense or the recent the other, terror of classical which is technically overwhelming in all its aspects, but the script is known memory. The beats of music to announce the known shock is not an invention of this film the truth. Bethlehem wheel demonstrates once again after offshore which is good actress and the once magnificent GERALDINE CHAPLIN "Unforgettable in doctor zhivago" returns to perform a role that clears the grotesque ridicule.Ultimately the orphanage is a horror film classic Bayonne where shows have expertise to create certain moments of tension and is technically quite laudable. Though of course it is not the masterpiece that we sell and I think even less as a whole to other works of similar characteristics.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1632

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Scoop

muchocine

Comedy light, certainly smaller, although fresh, pleasant, full of hilarious dialogues, frothed that complicity that Woody Allen has only with his loyal army of supporters.

What Woody Allen has been committed is not a comedy that came you before round: is a missile with direct lacitos to the flotation line of society British Welfare, which is to be the aristocracy with shareholdings in Philharmonic associations and little or no taste for remangar prejudices and avenir to fraternise with the flat greywith the working class people that get to work and has no idea of Henry Moore (there is one at a table given by the artist himself) or of 18th century harpsichords... And makes deliberate and so flippantly because East Scoop (scoop, in English) is first and foremost, a perfect entertainment, a vehicle for showcasing for Scarlett Johannsson (increasingly more carnal, resounding in their gestures and in his presence) and a return to confidence in a great director who is justice this humble rebuke, not him leaving things as we would like (A made in Hollywood ending)(Everything else or middling crooks are mediocre) with the outstanding exception of Match Point (curiously) away from writing humorous and housed in the drama cuasifilosófico.The English upper classes are the Allen shows us: which still lowered to laugh with comedian (the third wizard got to detective or tanker Woody Allen borda) while do them tricks of letters in a "typical english garden" which is not missing nor labyrinth Rococo tables for the tea of the five.The abundance of gags excuse the lightness of the plot: a young aspiring American journalist that passes one season in London receives a ultratumba confidence: the identity of the murder of the tarot, plaguing London killing prostitutes in black and short hair. The accused is a man of success, son of a Lord, phlegmatic in its modernity, astonished at the spontaneity of who, in search of clues that diluciden the truth about the murders, just falling for the investigated object, as she is well recognized.The mess does not guarantee laughter: Woody Allen does not claim to such a thing. His humor (has always been so) is linguistic, solidly anchored in the solvency of its language, that scavenging complicity with a spectator already familiar with their twists and completely dedicated to his peculiar way of understanding life. Scoop, in this sense, is not murder mystery Maniatan, which is certainly debtor, but gives us the wonderful opportunity to recover that time between the traditional and film that involves going to the cinema (I unfortunately have seen in dvd format) and let us go by the occurrences of this geniecillo New York. Scoop is one minor work, no doubt. Those who wield its lightness are not lacking in arguments, but Woody Allen can do another Scoop this year and this scribe will soon attend the premiere. In the Kingdom of the blind the one-eyed man is King and this innocent (in appearance) comedy of situation that Allen gives after the punch at the table which was Match say point abounds in anthologies scenes that could well have crept into more tronío tapes. There is no shortage even those winks moviegoers as his: fatal Acheron, the boat with the dead and the uncompromising Lair of Woody Allen film of Bergman, who has never left him at all.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/552

Ibán Manzano

Xmen3

muchocine

Ratner does not need to seek nothing more bullets than there are drawn, but is unable to free them all the necessary party.

Brett Ratner, like Brian Singer, has read the comic book series X-Men, but it is more than likely that you also enjoyed, have molado you and has thrilled with them. Ratner does not need to seek nothing more bullets than there are drawn, but is unable to get them everything the party needed, because it is obvious that as little is much worst director to Brian Singer.Puede thank that major virtue of X-Men 3, the final decision is that when it starts already is started: Singer endowed to the history of more ambitious readings and at least moderately intelligent, which at the same time sought some dramatic load characters. Ratner, perhaps incapable of both, directly enters the action after a brief prologue (as bright as necessary) to develop which paradoxically is the best argument of the three, but also the most untapped step. The vision of Ratner on X-Men is summarized in this time there are many more mutants (too many) but we imported some menosX Men 3 offers confusion and chaos to develop all its narrative plots, but the legacy of its two predecessors is still powerful, even intermittently the final decision is allowed some potentísimos moments, in fact the best of the trilogy, as it is the succession of their three big climax: the kiss between Jane and Cyclops, the duel telequinético, or the lifting of the Brooklyn Bridge, even if on the contrary the end runs, in comparison, something loose. X Men-3 closes the series with a furious and unbridled vision but equally or more entertaining, as well as continue to allow other interpretations more serious, which for the moment at least I do not have too many wanted to find.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2950

Tito Chinchan

La Jungla 4.0

muchocine

Film of an analog hero in a digital world. Call, dialogues testorénicos and technology, mixed, shaken and cocteleado. Pure fun.

There are actors that are guarantee of success when it comes to choosing a film, at least in our humble home. For example, the largest is Robert De Niro, that makes my hair like hooks to hang a Guernika each of them only mention it. Then there are others who I direis are not actors, such as the of the current Governor of California (not me pillais partiendome a phalanx by writing its name) that I love all of his films. Without more. And on the road between these two major, is Bruce Willis. Impressive, both primary and secondary.The film is about about John McClane, a COP in New York, which is assigned to a simple mission, to police station to carry a computer hacker. In these, a terrorist group is killing the latter, so it starts a flurry of call, shots, persecutions, etc, around an all-out terrorist attack based on global connectivity and the unit that has the modern society of telecommunications and informatics.Let's see, the movie begins rather well, not you've sat in the armchair and have already died some few. The theme I like, with a solid technological script. As the thing is advancing, started to make a few of waters, but as the mamporriano level increases exponentially, so nothing happens. We have the usual boasting of John McClane who, along a joke of patterns, does overwhelm the testosterone in the room. What can we say bad? I nothing.In short, film of an analog hero in a digital world. Call, dialogues testorénicos and technology, mixed, shaken and cocteleado. Pure fun.Besitos.P.D: Certainly the plane scene is a passivity, but what else does?Pd2: The use of special effects is not the usual. I would say that the majority of scenes are specialists, what gives added value, at least for me.P.D.3: Vale, the sentence of the analog hero is not mine, but to have been like a gentleman? Hahaha.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/846

Caruco

Casino Royale

muchocine

James Bond abandoned its charming and elegant forms to become a tipejo barriobajero, thuggish and rude, but still well continuous being impressive to be brandishing a weapon or wearing Tuxedo.

Strong Agarrénse! The new Bond has a full replica, peeled and great, cry that is already film history, at least for me. I do not desvelaré anything else, but it takes place in a sequence that will also be very dolorasamente remembered, above all, by men, because it hits exactly there, where it most hurts!And now I must mention another phrase that is not mine. Belongs to the critic Paul Arendt of the BBC: "the first thing is first: Craig is not a good Bond." It's a great Bond! "Specifically, it is a 007 as conceived it Ian Fleming". I love this critic! (Good!) (Don't get me wrong).And third praise, I don't know what the writers have taken is shaken or beaten, but not only is one of the best action games ever seen on a screen but also because it is truffle of brilliant and witty dialogues. And the plot is not that it is especially complicated, but has the sufficient unnerving twists.The direction of Martin Campbell, filmmaker already hardened in the necessities of 007, is effective, and the last thing you want to a Bond product is the director, and not the character, who imposes his universe and personality. But who wait the same Bond, the same characters, the same archetypes, characteristics or the same? gadgets? as always, it will be halfway. Do for a start, one of the brands of the Bond factory, the? teaser?, avoids the typical spectacular time for hooking us and in return gives us the time in which the most famous secret agent gets the "two zeros before", the licence to kill. The images, in black and white, very harsh; strong mounting and dialogues, short. They are a foretaste of what is to come.Without forgiveness.Announcing a change in the evolution of the series, and these are specified in a darker treatment of the characters, but above all in the fact that James Bond abandoned its charming and elegant forms to become a tipejo barriobajero, thuggish and coarse, but ever as well continuous being impressive to be brandishing a weapon or wearing Tuxedo.Yes, his face is animal, primary and wild. Don't miss the answer that gives a waiter when you ask as you prefer the Martini, and is a huge nasty.For years many commented that Bond, and so he was so devised as Ian Fleming, was not a hero but also a cold and ruthless killer. And so is the composition of Daniel Craig, a rough, but with class and taste, and no trusts or of its shadow.Why to kill as he does in all his films have to be thus a devil roundly, without a place in his heart for feelings, nor his soul for the remordiento site, as evidenced by William Bill?Will Munny?, or may be, in the Clint Eastwood teacher work that is "without forgiveness" (1992). And one of the writers is Paul Higgis ("Crash"), signatory of the libretti of "Million dollar baby" or "Flags of our fathers", of Eastwood.Lo that is already more realistic is another sing. Bond is able to pass through walls or undergo one "desfibriliación" (!), in one of the most tense sequences of the film. But Bond was always the opposite of the spies of John Le Carré. As a reflection of its time, no longer of the cold war or save the world but also that the background is terrorism, one of the scourges that are of most concern, and enparanoian, the current world. And the villain role, though several appear, it is also vulnerable. His name is Le Chiffre (Mads Mikkelsen), a banker who plays cards money from their clients, terrorist. every penny!And there are two pieces of females between the Bond girls: Solange (Caterina murine), who wears what it can in the few scenes that give; and Vesper Lynd (Eva Green), in total chemistry of hatred and attraction with Daniel Craig. Bond, also arrives to discover which means the letter "M" (interpreted by the charismatic Judi Dench, jumping pass the chronological order of the superiors of the British agent). Never comes it to disclose on screen, but I swear that it means "Mother" (i.e., "mother").And he cited the principle a memorable phrase, but there are other great moments as the persecution between a building in construction of Madagascar to a saltimbanqui (Sebastian Foucam, one of the personajes-hallazgo of the film), which are pure Vertigo; or the last (of defeat and victory, and vice versa) glances between Bond and the terrorist of the airport.There is another special dialogue during the presentation, on a plane, between Bond and Vesper. She is a Treasurer of the State which must give a very high sum of money so the spy faced, before and behind a table of Poker, with Le Chiffre. "Here's the money!", breaks it. And Bond, rather than reply, exclaims, referring to it: "Every penny!". As this new Bond worth it. Is it perfect? Of course not. It is extremely flawed!.?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1334

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Memento

muchocine

Polymorphic, quite intelligent, constructive, great film.

Movies with plot lines apparently dispersed in the end converge have never been my movie fan devotion santo: occasionally, the director just delivering with greater vigor to the formal pirotecnica than to refined and consistent thread natural things.Pulp fiction did the miracle of my reconciliation with that film divergences, looks that cross and revoked destinations just affiliated with the same narrative structure.Christopher Nolan in Memento is a recommended exercise of rewinding to know, at the end of the movie, what happened at the beginning. Far that this resource probably unnecessary, excessive ballast the final result of the film, here it catapult it to absolute levels of dramatic depth so that Memento is not conceived unless everything is so so abrupt.This abolition of the temporary line sits on the very nature of the character: Leonard Shelby (a dedicated Guy Pierce) suffers from a disease that makes him impossible to remember more recent events. This reality fractured in the mind of Leonard is the fractured reality of film: his obsession with dismantling the chronological level and fatigue to the Viewer (blessed fatigue) with a puzzle of Cartesian aesthetics closer to the literature of Cortázar as of the writing of the most utilitarian Hollywood.Go to the topic of the narrative deslavazamiento, insist too much in his amnesia as engine of criminal investigation, is subtracting hits, underestimate a very elaborate exercise in composition which leaves the obvious open fields, the doubts necessary so that no evidence is blunt and all agree to the fragile territory of speculation: we do not know for sure if the murderer (John g.) dies everytime Leonard da with a John G., but better not to reveal more of the plot, which is sufficiently esquinada, intelligent and perverse to catch our attention (and then our surrender without conditions) during these two more than recommended hours of film.Hybrid film between the eighties video and film noir of school, Memento is the Chronicle of a moral imbalance, the history of a revenge (the wife of Leonard is murdered and raped). Was filmed in a short month and despite receiving an excessive number of poor reviews (remarked the fact the plot hubbub prevented acquire a sharp knowledge of where was the story, which I felt was obstacle for take the film seriously as I wrote at the beginning of this review), won the battle of the public and is today, so few years after its premiere, cult film by the very original in its approach.Only we who lost, writes Jorge Luís Borges masterfully. Leonard has the physical object of photography, epidermal writing he better of prontuario actions: the routine as a method of composition of the reality. And such an inventory of resources must, in addition, guide you through the tangle of the (bizarre, polyhedral) research that leads to reveal us reason why we have at the beginning of the film a man with his head open and who was the murderer and rapist of his wife resulting than at the end (or principle) warned that perhaps (and I'm not counting anything relevant) everything is a Baroque puzzle in which the Editor knows in advance that the missing piece not It is on the table, but in his pocket.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/518

Rafa Ferrer

Mi super ex novia

muchocine

Get together two totally antagonistic concepts: the romantic comédia and superhero movies in a single concept. A good proposal for all those we will see these movies "husband Consort" as pig for slaughter.

Ivan Reitman manages to unite two totally antagonistic concepts (the romantic comédia and superhero movies) in a single concept, a tape of entertainment for all ages, just so you can understand much Puritan touch on the tape (sex with clothes?), the tape begins on an exceptional basis, a pity his change of pace in the last half-hour, which becomes a tad "unbearable".Interpretive level highlights a Uma Thurman in State of grace, a kind of "Supergirl" which in his Alter-ego resembles a female version of Clark Kent, and since her role in Tarantino's "Kill Bill", is one of the muses of 90% of the male population; While Luke Wilson, is not at the height, not even achieved copar low expectations you can have to see him on screen, Anna Faris, its online, as in the "Scary Movie's" but slightly more restrained.Few special effects (incréible for a film of this magnitude), are quite achieved, and the music accompanies beautifully every minute of footage, in short, a good proposal for all those we will see these movies "husband Consort" as pig for slaughter.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1819

Yul B.

Cerdos salvajes

muchocine

For some time I not laughed out loud in the cinema, but I do not take it as good. It is a film of the lot.

I am an approved high for this film. For some time I not laughed out loud in the cinema, and that is not easy to get a public tired of cheap comedietas.You know the Act of faith that I had to see this film. I have assumed that everything that smacks of Travolta is essential viewing for marital prescription and?Wild pigs. With a couple? from wheels? It would not be an exception.But this time I have not suffered so much. Conversely, at various times of the film I was about to throw me to the ground of laughter; and stating that I was not the only one, because the reaction of the rest of the public of the room, including my santa, was completely synchronized to each gag and each mess Quartet protagonist that it was prepared to cause such hilarious effect.However, despite the compliments that I just throw, I do not take it as a good movie. It has undesirable gaps in script, bad few situations and dialogues of the sea bream (which attributed in part to the unexplained loose dubbing), that break in a sharp way the good vibes in general transmitting the footage.For starters, the presentation of the main characters is very clumsy and without spark of grace, a detail that makes it start on the wrong foot. I think that aimed to its director, Walt Becker, is to teach with some humor to the viewer the life so boring to have Doug (Tim Allen), Woody (John Travolta), Bobby (Martin Lawrence) and Dudley (William H. Macy) which want to evade making a journey in 7 days bike by the country; and my personally not sack me or a smile.Does this unfortunate start made me fear a meltdown because expected that were going to swallow us one?Norbit? in power, or what is the same, a film that makes you grace to its director and his team more direct (for rally), and to no one else.But its course changes just when it begins the journey of our biker. From great scenes that make you laugh until no more power there occur (in which for my absolute protagonist is the character of Dudley), which reassures (at times), with other sequences that make cry of how bad they are, matter that keeps you on alert for a possible bajonazo of the divertimento.Do do these ups and downs, often changing the pace of the mood of the spectator, he placed this film the title of King of the movies? heap?. Not because is it more? heap? in all, but because raises a little head as all of them. It will convert effortlessly in a fun, endless passes television clasicón, ideal for evenings dumb pipes and camilla table skirt.If you had to rate each of the four? floats? These notes would be the role of 1 to 10.Tim Allen, I put a 3. Completely out of place, recently and literally eaten by the interpretation of the rest of the band. Often portraying Santa Claus him has diminished its artistic powers.To John Travolta, a 5 raspao; Do have seen you more loose and best comic vis in less profitable products as?Do look who's talking?, as amazing as?Do Pulp Fiction?, or as indifferent as?Be Cool?. That Yes, are we put the willies of emotion when go you the legs to dance (in a scene his character Woody Dudley teaches a few steps to conquer a girl, the eternally attractive Marisa Tomei).Martin Lawrence, I give a 4 high. It takes little to walk that thug style which has been exhibited in his films blockbuster (?)Do thief police?,?Is this grandmother a danger? or?(Do two policemen rebel?). I saw low way, and a little fondón, do not know if it's because it was the script that overweight.And, finally, William H. Macy, a 9. Great, the soul of the film; the best scenes they have left him it. Personified clumsiness performed so absolutely elegant. Here has proven me to be a SUV.Outside this group, I would stress to Ray Liotta, with that face of pimp who has provided that it scares. Ideal in his role as biker thug eager to free-for-all.Done the review end of rigor I can only say one thing: throw toss the viewing of this film, and if you have to go to see her try to enjoy it to the fullest forgiving the shortcomings that I have mentioned, because you going to laugh to mogollon.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3091

Tito Chinchan

Sicko

muchocine

Essential documentary about the health system of the most powerful country on the planet. I am sure that the President of the Government displays it the next time that being told that social security is wrong with Spain.

This Michael Moore that appears in the poster I guess he is the twin brother of which we know. Either the "fotochó" Lord had overtime in the Office, not what is. Watch I like work to me of this type. And looks that I liked the documentary, Gee. Although they have shocked me things as fat as Americans (I still impressed), that trip to Cuba (which in other times would have burned you their compatriots at the stake) that distills Castro propaganda, and this distorted view of countries that us shows. But hey, nothing serious.The documentary is about the U.S. health care system. Starts giving a vision of people who don't have insurance to go to what if they do. Gives an overview of the entire system, and compares it to other countries, such as France. Great Britain, Canada or Cuba, leaving a terrible reality in the most powerful country in the world. You can die at the door of the hospital, and you can even get to die outside one of these, as you do not have money. Terrible.estoy overwhelmed after these two hours with the increasingly orondo Moore. Overwhelmed and outraged by the images I've seen. It is true that Michael played much with the feelings of the Viewer, getting in the skin of cases, perhaps ends, of people with limit situations. So what? If you want to make a documentary that cale in the people, have to do what they see, feel involved, touch them the fiber and boil with rage (maybe I've gone, but remained very Braveheart). As was done here with traffic campaigns. In the same way.In short, essential documentary about the health system of the most powerful country on the planet. I am sure that the President of the Government displays it the next time that being told that social security is wrong with Spain. Addresses a few issues that makes you scream with chest enchido of pride, Viva Spain and all their national entities (eye)!!Uff, by empathy, about the 18-month-old baby has made me cry like a Magdalene.Besitos.P.D: I have to stop writing criticism in the half hour after seeing the films, I glow. Not so much as Michael Moore, which would seem Hulk ruining clothes, lol.Pd2: The last pie has a commentary on a type of a website that worth the documentary only by seeing it. In my view.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1031

Tito Chinchan

La alianza del mal

muchocine

Peliculilla of action and half afraid, correct and good special effects which can be seen quite well. Too bad actors past age, that things could have been much better. Hey, and it is well small.

In my eternal fight against the trailers of the films, I must say that this called me attention to many things. To start one blowing him raises the skirt to a mocica that spends less on panties that I in quiff. Useasé, sex which always like. Then special effects cool car stamping against a truck. Okay, all right. So with these premises, I started to see it, come on, with a bad omen that things would be bad. And no, not what it seemed.The film's four kids under the age of dad (of those who have pipes eggs hairs but trying to convince us that are less) that descend from four of the five families of children of Ipswich. Apparently at the age of thirteen are powers of these malignant, but upon reaching the eighteen that becomes the repanocha and they are nearly invincible. In what they expect to arrive that happy moment, they begin to go unexplained things in the village, so suspect they themselves.In itself, what is the movie I entertained enough, passing a good time. It has enough special effects, without exceeding useless, with a script allowing to follow. The actors do not too bad, especially for what I expect of a simple viewing of the poster. In the plain negative, a few things. On the one hand that have already mentioned your age, given that these have seventeen years in each leg, and this kills me with potatoes. And on the other hand that have taken four effeminate cachitas that are far much of what we expect as the Alliance of evil. No, evil seems like more "first and hairy", right?In short, peliculilla of action and half afraid, correct and good special effects which can be seen quite well. Too bad actors past age, that things could have been much better. Hey, and it is well small.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2893

Cp

El ultimátum de Bourne

muchocine

Very good for the connoisseurs of the previous installments, and much better than the rest of the Billboard of action, for all others. Hopefully after a break we have new Jason Bourne movies.

First distinction. There are two types of person watching this movie. Those who saw the first two and which not. For the first film is a continuation of the previous two, and we cannot justify his script is much easier, or at least history not be overly complicated. If we just this film, seems to be simply a Chase at full speed, without just history, and where we do not understand very well by the things that happen. But well, rare will be the audience that goes to see her without having enjoyed the previous.As I have seen the previous two, I liked the movie. I agree that history is no more than an extension of the previous, and almost more an epilogue. Maybe I'm wrong, but it does not give the impression of being an error, but it has been raised so. Obviously, after the great level of previous installments, third weakens a bit in comparison, but even seeing it as a separate film, continues to draw a great advantage to the rest of the tapes of action that we currently have.We again have a realistic and coherent film where the bad guys also think and they are good ideas, and the protagonist is achieving its objectives for so doing even better, or with the help of a little luck. Again, very well directed, and alternate the wildest moments with your camera, others where the more general image allows you to follow the action without any problems. There are who criticizes electric Chamber movements in fighting hand-to-hand, and Yes, I agree that allow that Matt Damon seems much more fast and lethal, but they have already become a brand of films. If Greengrass used these movements also in the shootings and the persecutions of cars, I like nothing, but as a sign of fighting melee, close and brutal, I admit that I love. As actors, again perfectly, although in this case, script shortage leaves us with a bad new that we barely got a glimpse, and that perhaps is the greatest sin of the film. In such stories, the figure of the bad is essential, and the better villain is the Algerian murderer, which does not say a word just, but always draws attention when this on screen. Also reappear other brands in the series such as scenarios in European cities and persecutions of credible cars, although brought to the limit of the possibilities, as well as any other electronic gadget and some trick of Bourne to mislead their pursuers. Finally, I can't help but quote the Matt Damon, that when asked by the Bond films, please do not hesitate to respond, that James Bond would one of the bad guys in the Bourne series, becoming our imagination a cameo of Daniel Craig.En summary, very good for the connoisseurs of the previous installments, and much better than the rest of the Billboard of action, for all others. Hopefully after a break we have new Jason Bourne movies.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1034

Ramón Balcells

Hijos de los hombres

muchocine

A masterpiece full of shocking sequences (I forgot to mention the explosion of the principle) and interpretations that rub or reach perfection. Alfonso, we thank you for giving us such wonderful.

There are times that a story can seem so real that it seems that you're experiencing the same moments that the protagonists. This is the case of children of men, a futuristic tape that shows how, in the year 2027, is born, after 18 years, the first child. It is clear that is a masterful film, full of absolutely stunning planos-secuencia (the picture is carried out, nothing more and nothing less than by Emanuel Lubezki), brilliant performances and a flawless script (based on the novel by P.D.James). Are you has of mention to Alfonso Cuarón for having given this cinematic gem.The argument base is simply brutal. Not only the base, not, but all together. The argument of children of men is, symbolically, a trip to hope. And it is that the film is told as a journey, so it makes, not only more beautiful, but also more interesting it. In reality, each one's life is a journey, and this I think is what you want us to count Cuarón. in this case, the journey begins with a series of actors really disconcerting: Clive Owen (the protagonist of the function, as well as show us that you know walk with sandals, showing its most dramatic and human facet), Julianne Moore (who did not get too)(, but you get completely into his character, thanks to his great performance), Michael Caine (what about this wonderful actor who here plays a hippie who will be a great help for the protagonist), Chiwetel Ejoifor, Pam Ferris (the evil Director of the school of Matilda) and the unknown but brilliant in his role, Clare-Hope Ashitey (his middle name is done on purpose?). With this cast, it is normal that realism is even greater, since actors give us the best of themselves.The film has many really memorable sequences. One of them, more than a sequence is a chapter, is that in which Owen, Ashitey and Ferris infiltrate in the field of refugee immigrants be able to access the boat that will take them to the human project. Another, no doubt, is the getaway car that does not boot. It is also necessary to mention such as dense dialogues between Owen Moore and Caine. And finally, the splendid end. Absolutely incredible.Cuarón speaks of humanity. Speaks of hope, of pain, of children, of pessimism, an apocalyptic future of a terrorized society, of political forces. This is one of those movies that have more or less everything. There are directors who know how to mix so many items at the same time (such as Cuarón), there are others that do not. Mexican director manages to create a totally overwhelming human speech. I would say that with few more, knows to show images of human philosophy. Children of men each actor plays, not only its role, but a symbolism. Note: Owen represents the company; The past Moore; Caine philosophy; and hope Ashitey.One of the best moments, as I have said before, the film is that in which Jasper (Caine) explains to Theo (Owen) the reason for the disappearance of children and the theory that the human project exists. The phrases that Jasper said have everything.In short, a masterpiece full of shocking sequences (I forgot to mention the explosion of the principle) and interpretations that rub or reach perfection. Alfonso, we thank you for giving us such wonderful.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4247

Oscar Martínez

Pozos de ambición

muchocine

Wells of ambition is a hyperrealist spiritual involution inversely proportional to the social evolution of atmosphere kubrickiana for total showcasing of an immeasurable Daniel Day-Lewis.

Directed by Paul Thomas anderson and starring Daniel Day-Lewis, Paul Dano, Kevin J.. O'Connor, Ciarán Hinds and Russell Harvard, There will be blood, translated here - this time Yes have been taste - as wells of ambition, is nominated for eight Oscars and already has in his possession a globe of Oro.Basada in the novel Oil! Upton Sinclair, the film is an epic story about family, faith, power and oil, which takes place on the border of California at the end of the 19th century. Wells of ambition is a chronicle of the life and times of Daniel Plainview, happens to be a miserable miner who has to bring forward a single son, an oil magnate. One day a Plainview comes a mysterious murmur on a city to the West where a sea of oil oozes towards the outside, and there goes with his son, H.W. to try his luck in the dusty Little Boston. This paltry city, where the only possible fun revolves around the Church directs the charismatic preacher Eli Sunday, Plainview and H.W. give his stroke of luck. But now that the Fortune begins to smile les, nothing will ever again be the same: conflicts arise and all human values - love, hope, community, faith, ambition and even the bond between father and son - are exposed to corruption, deception and the flow of oil.Señor@s, we have before us the title should be the Oscar for best film and Best Actor by far, with forgiveness of this another genius of the Coen brothers that tomorrow I will see for the second time. And it is ambition wells, recalling some unfortunate comments lost by this humble blog, film is capitalized.Having previously directed titles as diverse as Boogie nights, Magnolia or Punch drunk love, Paul Thomas Anderson brings a mammoth production of 158 minutes for absolute showcasing of Daniel Day-Lewis. With a photograph austere although replete with beautiful and arid panoramic and with a plot that could remind us of a sort of dark giant, Wells tells ambition the degradation of the human being through the power, and makes it a doubly worthwhile way: firstly, because it shows us that corruption of the soul through several characters who evolve hand in hand, and secondly because achieves that, like the protagonists, the viewer not is knows the fatal consequences of such degradation unless it is already too late.Done and structured as a biography, ambition wells offers us an inversely proportional spiritual involution social evolution, as it said, reflected both the Reverend young from the Church of the third day Eli Sunday, whose different friction over decades are without a doubt the best of the film and the character of Daniel Plainview. Thus, wells of ambition stands as a cruel portrait of human greed, a heartbreaking all human scourges canvas framed in the extremely Puritan society of the United States of century.But, if there is something else that worth mentioning wells of ambition to separate its exciting although dense history and that, for a server, it is the best interpretation of Daniel Day-Lewis to date, it is the atmosphere kubrickiana that pervades the entire film by Paul Thomas Anderson: since the texture of his photography to his strident and disturbing soundtrackuntil his unorthodox sequence end.Finally, for a server, a small wonder with aftertaste classic.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1265

Caruco

Apocalypto

muchocine

I believe that this type just invent a new (sub) genre: gore-historical. It will be a bocazas and an alcoholic, but by many heads to roll, other than her own. How filmed this guy!

Me I am still shaking up weeds, cleaning the mud to me, taking away some another splash of blood and, above all, the smell of (human) meat decomposition.I've seen "Apocalypto" and is that Mel Gibson is so beast. I also believe that this type just invent a new (sub) genre: gore-historical.With "Braveheart" already warned at the time that the battle scenes contain flat durillos, and is that at that time they were very gross; and in "The passion of the Christ" finally gave rein to his side more unleashed. Both Mad Max have run you into the head and body!And has created a (sub) genre again with a couple of co?! First making his characters speak in any ancient Mayan type dialect (which gets you you filled in time and place); and then showing the violence without recreate it, as more primitive and real, that reminds us that human are thus of animals, and that our ancestors, is here, in Scotland or the pre-Columbian America, were even more because his arms were perhaps less sofisdicadas.This is not to mention that with a budget of about $ 50 million it recreates a world of a late 15th century, when other directors, for example, Nancy Meyers, need double only to furnish the comfortable homes of their two protagonists in "Holiday". Heads rolling.The result would delight Truffaut in "The noble savage" (1969), and Terrence Malick, for his idyllic vision of the primitive, naive, pure community and in perfect harmony with nature; and all of this utopian world ravaged by wars in the name of progress and civilization.Also would agree even to the very Stallone and Schwarzenegger, because both the Dutch in predator (1987) as to the Johnny Rambo's "Rambo" (1982) jump les a lagrimilla of emotion when he saw this intrepid "jaguar claw" so convincingly played by Rudy Youngblood.Y is expected that you fill with enthusiasm also fans of adventure and action, and good film, because "Apocalypto" is a great movie that hooked from beginning to end. Shot in an admirable manner, relying above all on the image and striking party of plasticity even with the color of the paintings that cover the bodies of slaves: white for the job, blue for the sacrifice.Am not going to reveal anything, not even the type of nails are spent Aboriginal sewing wounds. What better discover for yourselves, but yes I leave that (human) meat decomposition flavored so well it corresponds with the vision of an empire in decline, the instinct of survival and also with the hope as an illusion which can never be defeated.It will be a bocazas and an alcoholic, but by many heads to roll, other than her own. How filmed this guy!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2623

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Ratatouille

muchocine

Fascinating exercise of film of great height that, without being her masterpiece many critics (read the Introit of the review) believe see, becomes the best movie of the summer: inapelablemente.

4.3.1The work of the critic is easy in more than one sense. We risk very little, and however usufructuamos a position located above those who submitted their work and his person in our view. We prosper thanks to negative criticisms, which are fun when you enter and when is the lee.2Pero the stark truth critics must face is that, in general terms, the production of average garbage is more valuable than what our articles are intended to point out. However, sometimes the critic truly risks something, and this happens on behalf and in defense of something nuevo.3Anoche I experienced something new, an extraordinary meal made by someone unique and unexpected. Say that this dish and its chef put to test my preconceptions would be tantamount to committing a gross underestimation, when the truth is that both were able to touch the depths of my ser.4Antes of this event, I never hid my disdain for Chef Gusteau's motto: "anyone can cook". But, I realize, just now I understand his words. Not anyone can become a great artist, but a great artist do come from anywhere.Anton Ego, the critical gastronómicoPor all that, even if only to see this character, must go to the movies and enjoy two hours of an exceptional animated banquet, a blatantly commercial gimmick, written and designed to engolosinar to the child and youth, plataea but covered with a patina of unquestionable adult honesty. It is not enough that the animation techniques are amazing. That action Cup good part of the footage. There are occasions in which this reliable and expected arsenal of cinematographic benefits do not guarantee a round film (Cars, put for example), but Ratatouille is a fascinating exercise in film of great height that, without being her masterpiece many critics (read the Introit of the review) believe see, becomes the best movie of the summer, time of weak favors entertainment intelligent and usually nourished of pastelazos without (Next) possible defence or Classics (by repetitive) artifacts of great acceptance and minor aesthetic integrity (the fantastic 4, Harry Potter, the jungle.)All that sweet lightness which is attributed a priori films orchestrated for the benefit of the child racket exists in Ratatoille. It has the outstanding merit of matrimoniar form harmonious and almost imperceptible (that is another point in their favor) the brochazo of universally accepted cartoon and the subliminal line of lucid text, well built and, above all, educational. It is the film that would have made Frank Capra have enjoyed these times of impeccable technique. And James Stewart would have excited in the armchair. (Now UB-40 song assumes a new significance).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2319

Dragon negro

Transformers

muchocine

Transformers is, despite their defectillos, a great movie of action and effects, fun and entertaining and above all that can be seen and you can enjoy cinema of evasion in its purest form but that it holds under its own weight.

Yesterday I had the opportunity of attending the European premiere of the latest film from Michael Bay, Transformers, in the Auditori of Sitges. First of all there is to say that Transformers faced, personally, the challenge to be above other major blockbuster productions that have been presented this year as Spider-man 3 and Pirates of the Caribbean 3 which have been two disappointments, it is very difficult not what I had, but apart from that I had to convince and view once, I can only say that Transformers Yes convinces and is that palomitera film of great special effects and action were expected to view.The film focuses on the character of Shia LaBeouf, apart from carrying other parallel stories, but who carry the weight of history will be its character, whose tatatarabuelo was discovered in the Arctic a great giant robot, a secret that will make you suffer the consequences in the present. His character is the typical flacucho Institute in love with the popular girl, but far from being the standard Peter Parker, here we see as no doubt stand up to the players on the team and espabilar for your account when necessary. Little takes to appear the first Transformer at a military base in the desert and sown chaos in a spectacular scene of destruction, the first of a few to the length of the film. The fight will focus on finding the cube of the spark of life and see who can do with it.Combines large doses of action and spectacular effects, best seen in what we have year and I doubt very much that are overcome, with large doses of humor that really make you drop more than one laugh. The plot unfolds in parallel in three or four lines argue them that they combine perfectly without being over any of them. LaBeouf carries the weight of the film with some dignity and has left me pleasantly surprised and eager to see their role in Indiana Jones 4 where already I have no doubt that it will do really well. Just manages to be eclipsed by John Turturro in the role of an agent of the Government most chulito and past very insane thread. The girl, Megan Fox isn't bad and his character moves away slightly from the typical girl placed vase to make nice, which is to be welcomed.All this is fine, but is not at all a round film, and is that we must not forget where we are and that this is a family film and for a mainstream, and that is noted in the, at times, excessive jokes and ridiculous situations carried the limit to win the favor of the smallest. A humor that has times is excessive and that at times he can talk the talk of the rest of the film, but all in all is forgiven. The other weak point from my point of view is the design of the robots, which have never been to my liking and always have preferred classical designs. Transformations are fast and quite chaotic with much movement on all sides that does not let you see where everything goes, robots are too nimble and fast for the size they have, and resemble too much between them, to such an extent that it sometimes costs to recognize which is even a Decepticon and what an Autobot. But just assumed this point remains enjoy fights and action, successful and improsionante, and with some scene in slow motion that leaves the mouth open.The music accompanies the film very well and we have since epic melodies, the arrival of the Autobots is superb, with music writing when it comes to the turn of the battles.Transformers is a great movie of action and effects, fun and entertaining despite its defectillos, and above all that can be seen and you can enjoy, not intended to be an americanada as often happens in these productions and has a fast-paced rhythm that barely lapses during his two hours and peak duration, cinema of evasion in its purest form, but that it holds under its own weight.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/424

Kiko de España

La joven del agua

muchocine

Great film genre (fantasy, it is understood) filmed as if it were a story.

M has done again it. Man, not reached the excellent results of the protected, but is fighting with signals in my Top 3 Shyamalan particular (the second is forest). Demonstrates once again that it is the best composing levels, then filming them and giving suspense to any story that comes to mind. I am not going to tell you anything about the movie to not make you a predetermined idea of the film, but it is a wonderful film genre (fantasy, it is understood) filmed as if it were a story (that is). It is a tale. With the successes and the shortcomings that entails. Poignant Paul Giamatti, excellent girl Howard and the highest cast of side of M to date. This time, the usual paper reserves the director has far more relevance than usual, but no matter, not at odds with his character. How to clash, if he has written? Wonderful image which gives the film critics (are) and perhaps lame to say the least, the usual humor of his movies, that if in this film works on occasion, slashing forced elsewhere. And have three (or four) resolutions. (To no end) Anyway, Shyamalan is vigorous in the direction, and music orchestrated by the usual James Newton Howard is outstanding. We must see it. 8.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2345

José Córdoba

Shrek Tercero

muchocine

Shrek the third is a unnecessary film, by the mere fact of making money; the formula is exhausted, the worn-out characters, the weary writers.

Something bad happens to a comedy when the two songs with greater importance in its plot are bars initials of Live and Let Die by Paul and Linda McCartney and 9 of Damien Rice, which is not exactly the joy of the orchard.Gives too lazy comment on a movie like this, so I did not expend many words. Shrek the third is a unnecessary film, by the mere fact of making money; the formula is exhausted, the worn-out characters, the weary writers. There is no life in the film, is an inert product for 90 minutes. Everything that happens is predictable and without grace, even for children who are targeted. Technically it is more of the same, there is no innovation, it saves even in that aspect. It has nor the irreverence (albeit with many nuances) from the first, or spoof the second tone. Finally a horror, that does not serve or for children to spend a good time (proven) film. And the worst is that they have already given the green light to the fourth and fifth part.In summary, huid of the plague.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/244

Ivan Sainz-Pardo

El señor de la guerra

muchocine

Risky, thoughtful, virtuous, necessary and really fabulous work

With brand new press pass, I went to see, during morning hours, this film without knowing too much about it. The films, they reach the viewer or definitely are on the way. "Lord of war", in my case, has managed to dent. I has overwhelmed, entertaining and I enjoyed generously from the outset.Begins with an absolutely brilliant sequence, summarizing, during the opening credits, the overall intention of his footage. One amazing subjective from a bullet, since its manufacture until to get to snatch the life to a human being. Its director, Andrew Niccol is responsible for the "Gattaca" inspiradísima, who wrote also "El Show de Truman" and "The terminal". In this case it faces here a script very complicated for his risky and controversial subject. Few were not American producers that ran before such a project, and much of the funding has come from foreign producers.There are several points that made the purported success of this project, a mission almost impossible: A plot that he flirts with the documentary, despite being mere fiction and that, at the same time get apabullar in the visual section. The mixture of both formats is never an easy task and the result, when it works, is something that, to me, personally, I wonder. Similar theme, but as a mere documentary, we got more than one year ago the shocking and essential "Darwin's nightmare".Another difficult point is to get away with a plot-driven by a voice. I guess that negative criticism may arrive precisely at this point. I think in this case it works, at least it not at odds and it not thumping, which is already fairly. Another section is the of trying to achieve the necessary empathy with a protagonist who is a real son despicable bastards and unscrupulous does not hesitate a second trample, buy and sell up to his own family to get lionize in a trade as morally respectable, as it is that of illegal arms trafficking and the financing of wars and massacres in half the world. This character is Yuri Orlov (Nicolas Cage), a character inspired by five characters supposedly real that here one only. A Ukrainian victim of the American dream, which already once in New York in the eighties, get transformed into a powerful and respected billionaire thanks to his talents on the international black market weapons. An atrocious and destructive character able to move mountains with only blinking and which recognize right away, because it represents these white men that already warned us before Michael Moore in his books and in his documentaries. And precisely what terrifies us is really feeling this strange empathy with the character, and get to understand their motivations and their arguments: "tobacco companies also mercadean with death and are not persecuted" "And if my business is not currently illegal enough to stop me, because who make the laws in the world are my best customers or my bosses" "what more does?"", if I desaparezco, come immediately another at my place" and thus, Yuri, where terrified, his wife, an international model which it worried buy as if only a luxury Jewelry Diamond was, asked please abandon once and for all the business, this responds: "Can not, because this really I feel very well".And also we recognize immediately in the wife of Yuri, (Bridget Mohynahan) prostituida by the luxuries, for the money, for the material, but at the same time, single and bereaved personally, as any real character on our consumerist society, materialistic and capitalist. And then this brother of Yuri, (Jared Leto) embodying the role on the other side of the coin of this modern society, of the "American Dream", as a victim more as doll broken and addicted to drugs, witness and participant in the Yuri bloody business, as millionaire, so corrupted like him and so empty inside. And this elitist world power and exacerbated luxury comes in contrast with the portrait of a third world helpless, rotten and hungry, victim of wars, disease and misery. Victims of their own dictators, customers of exception of the black market and the globalizing spoliation of the multinational Western. Ethan Hawk portraying a police Interpol which, tireless, this time it's pursuing and arresting Yuri. A species of Jiminy cricket that symbolizes our moral conscience, a species of rare, impotent bug in its tenacious fighting for a lost cause.There will be those who perhaps see here a slow or boring film. For me, it's a risky, thoughtful, virtuous, necessary and really fabulous work. The music is careful, the script still works despite not reaching the stature of "Scarface" or "Goodfellas" and visual invoice is much better that notable, it full of symbologies and black humor. Ultimately, one of the best films I have seen in recent years. A nice discovery with a single but, I have not done.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/407

Red Stovall

Clerks 2

muchocine

Smith has made his second best film and removing to Rosario Dawson, has written the best and more affectionate updating possible for its mythical characters.

After a film too "geek" even more radical fans?Do do Jay and Silent Bob Bob?, and a soft and conservative comedy family?Does Jersey Girl?, which fell on the topic of "Dad never came to the role of the cole," Kevin Smith was at a crossroads. ?Clerks II?, is undoubtedly the best way to regain the attention and lost followers. There are many expectations raised with this film. Meet them Kevin Smith? Almost?Do first, can say that?Clerks II? It has more than one memorable dialogue and more than one thug joke that, surely, will be remembered. For example, the discussion about what trilogy is better, if the of?The Lord of the rings? or?Star Wars?. Or the politically incorrect debate about whether calling someone a "slave of shit" is racist or not. Lapidary phrases and irreverent humor that manage to sustain a film of irregular rhythm. Of course, each entered in pounds O Brian?Halloran and Jeff Anderson still have that same chemistry in the first part.The problem comes by the side of the construction of the story and the character of Rosario Dawson. ?Clerks? It was a respond very cleverly linked anecdotes succession to conclude with a concise and powerful reflection on two characters unable to take charge of his life. In this second part, the characters remain dependent eleven years later, and the central plot are the efforts of the protagonist, Dante, to try to change his life. This change in life is to go to Florida with his girlfriend while parents of this paid a flat and portraying Dante to work in a car washing business. Does the problem lies not only in what little appeal of this perspective? and his girlfriend, Jennifer Schwalbach, wife of the director in real life? but, moreover, we see that his boss, Rosario Dawson, and Dante have a strange sentimental story behind. Does chemistry between O Brian?Halloran and Rosario Dawson is null. This could be to forgivable, despite its lack of verisimilitude, since we know that the name and the extremely good aspect of the actress were an asset that could not dispense with Smith if he wanted to attract viewers to the box office with more than the fame of the original film. The problem is that Kevin Smith, as well as at the worst moments of?Chasing Amy?, gets involved in lengthy and deep dialogue terribly sobreexplicativos. The pace stops, the tone of comedy lost and Kevin Smith, as any clumsy writer, dedicated to making explicit dramatic conflicts. All triple of what should be hard and one wondered where is that Kevin Smith who, disguised as "Silent Bob" in the first part, was able to solve everything with a lapidary phrase. Do anyway, it seems that this is what Kevin Smith meant by "maturity", and that the disastrous legacy of?Chasing Amy? and?Jersey Girl? leave note in the film we are discussing now. But we must not be so hard. ?Clerks 2? It tells the story of two characters who, eleven years later, have failed to do anything with their lives, and this, by force, should be noted. The lightness of?Clerks? It is no longer repeatable. If you want something, better view?Do marching?, a debtor film of?Clerks? of which I spoke, located in a burger bar (do scenario, where, interestingly enough, takes place?)Clerks 2? (do homage to the homenajeador?). Having said that, "deep" dialogs are not so many nor sink both the film. Even, occasionally, Kevin Smith manages to remove melodramatismo to many times placing them in hilarious scenes or rounding them with really good jokes. Even more: If had lasted half, the final discussion between Dante and Randal scene is full of successes, interesting reflections, and gives the key to enjoy?Clerks 2?: a romantic comedy gay (or Brian?)Halloran and Jeff Anderson want more than either of the two and any girl) where the character of Rosario Dawson is an absolute and impostado pad. The problem is that it seems that, for the director of?Does Jersey Girl?, maturity can only come by the way of the marriage and parenthood. E equal to that I said this about Eduardo Noriega when writing about?Do do Alatriste?, have to say about this awesome woman: often sacrifice marry Rosario Dawson.Y Yes, I know this is getting into ideological issues of each, and that Kevin Smith has every right to think very conservative? it is, although it garnish his proclamations of nerd jokes?. The problem comes when this conservatism leads you to make clumsy, fake, script decisions impeding the pace and that make you want to wait for the next moment in which Randal, Jay and Silent Bob make a new cafrada.The final balance, in short, is positive. Kevin Smith has made his second best film and removing to Rosario Dawson, has written the best and more affectionate updating possible for its mythical characters. The final sequence, surely, even to those who, at the time we enjoy with?Clerks?. I would even say more: I am surprised is not produce a big applause, as also deserves it the fun opening scene. ?Clerks? was a single film that will not return, although it was true that he deserved to be among the films more overvalued in the history of the cinema, but?Clerks II? It is what is called aging with dignity.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3629

Dario Lavia

Perversidad

muchocine

Fritz Lang addresses a thorny issue and gives that speak to public, critics and censors.

Is it possible to make two films with identical ingredients and that both are different? One year Fritz Lang had offered one of his masterpieces of the American period, THE WOMAN IN THE WINDOW (the woman of the table-1944), and the next proposed take their same elements to make an adaptation of the novel "La Chienne" (1931) of Fouchardiere Georges (which had been brought to the screen by Jean Renoir). So starts the story with the timid bank employee Chris Cross (Edward g. Robinson), which leaves a dinner of coworkers in which of the Chief gift him a watch for 25 years of service and stumbles upon what appears to be a damsel in distress (Joan Bennett). Of course, the mature man is fascinated as a teenager of the sympathy of the young, which indeed is bride of a street malviviente (Dan Duryea) who kisses her and slaps alike (its cafiolo). The situation soon becomes subject of tango: she is shown as complacent and begins to ask for money, a Department for live, subtracts it his paintings (Cross is describe painter) and sells them. Again have a candid, manipulated (and even having) Robinson by the circumstances of the fate but largely by the vagaries of the beautiful Joan Bennett (also becomes "woman in painting"). Again, the villain is Dan Duryea and again has bow and straw hat. However, here ends the equivalence between both films of Lang. The tone of the film is not entirely seriously (in a timely manner a crime ends with all possible air comedy), and the course of history is clearly tragic and realistic (as opposed to La table woman who was joyful and dreams). There are memorable characters ("the deceased husband of the table" seems to preanunciar a common situation of the Italian comedy of the 1950s), sharp dialogues and own the most sordid melodrama German pesadillescos and tense climates. And also a milestone, which is to be the first film in which a crime remains unpunished (which in turn joined the modus operandii for the aforementioned murder earned Lang various problems with censorship). Will be the director confessing of an old crime of passion? If that is the case, after the flow of topics, emotions and situations of both films, we believe that we can give you forgiveness.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1130

Kahzrrak

Eragon

muchocine

And now comes the required question: and if someone tells me that he has not read the book nor wants to do this?, because in that case the film you'll love, because as the basis of the script is good, for those who do not know all that missing, going you to like.

And, as it could not be otherwise, here came I talking about this palícula. Now recall that I spoke at the time of this book (and, if not, look in Yo Geek in April 2006) and put it through the roof: in fact the book was pretty good (nothing like the Lord of the rings, but books like that there is only one). Perhaps that is why the film has seemed so mediocre. We return again to an important issue: who can think sum up such book in one hour and forty minutes?. History in armchair loses a lot strength: let you explain a lot of things. Poorly represented characters (what Paolini village lost in the horns the úrgalos? from the Elf when appears half in love with Eragon?. and goes on and on), not to mention the "peazo" throne that has Galbatorix.Tampoco explains where Durza does, the name of the Dragon is prefixed by Eragon, not be invented it (in fact, in the book is given some importance to the name)(, as that was the name of a very famous Dragon in the history of Paolini), not to mention that Saphira constantly leads the opposite to Eragon (and of course, is not "what you say blonde," as they say in the film). Let's talk about something else: to anyone who has not read the book know where does the power of magic?: I won't say here if someone even has intention of reading the book, which is one of the things that make the book to have consistency and, in fact it will be important in the second part(: anyway, if unto someone was curious, to ask me in the section "comments" and will reply you). In short, that the script has been quite bungler.And now comes the required question: and if someone tells me that he has not read the book nor wants to do this?, because in that case the film you'll love, because as the basis of the script is good, for those who do not know all that missing, going you to like.Another point: talk about the place where the vardenos are hidden: we must recognize that the mental image writer (Christopher Paolini) left in my mind of such a place, not correspond at all to the scenario in which the battle of the end of the film then unfolds! (I know, the vardenos lived in a kind of 'hollow mountain', not in a kind of Valley with a shabby wooden Middle bridge).In summary: If you've not read the book, probably the movie you like. If you've already read the book, probably the film also you like, but will be quite disappointed in comparison to how one makes you vibrate.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2478

José A. Peig

Harry Potter y el prisionero de Azkaban

muchocine

Spare not missing anything in the course of the narrative. Even in the scenes on magical teachings, screenwriter and director managed to prevent were spare parts of filling - a defect common to the two previous deliveries - and work here integrated into the main reasons: the mystery of Sirius Black, the Dementors and fears of Harry Potter.

Alfonso Cuarón is a filmmaker who uses a striking aesthetic, likes to play with the images and create planos-secuencias of great visual strength, or diverse frames that go from lírico-colorista to an ochre dark and macabre, emphasizing sometimes tragic situation with subtle expression. There is a fairly widespread misconception that defines it as "author" or "independent" director. But this is a mistake. It is true that film what counts is the singular vision of a creator who creates your world through the eye of the camera. However, a complete aesthetic works requires something more you framing suggestive and imaginative. Or combine in a balanced way the continent (images, framing, mounting, levels, chromatic resources, art direction, etc.) with the content (topics, development of characters and history, emotional connection, etc). With all this we come to say that Cuarón is a skilled and creative filmmaker in the Mise en scène, but weak when the question is to a regular and strong outline its dramatic look, the content of the story. In this same booklet explained that children of men is a sweeping visual spectacle, but too weak and irregular in the construction of a human set and a truly unique content. The prisoner of Azkaban is another example of the same. Cuarón maximized the potential of the universe "harrypotteriano": plays with images with remarkable lyrical sensitivity, Hogwarts is an ideal space to display the visual imagination and it shows that the filmmaker is in its sauce, creates images based on the circumstances without Miss or a single element; a flower Withers to the passage of the sinister Dementors, fall leaves a happy tree on depth of field which culminates with the castle of Hogwarts, introduces us to the paradoxes of time through a flat stream that runs through the bowels of a large mechanical clock. More that a strong Narrator, Cuarón is engaged in painting pictures taking advantage of the orography of the world of Hogwarts.Con a particular visual style is not forged a masterpiece. The root of the problem may not be in the work of J.K Rowling both the profile of the filmmaker. Taking into account that we are in the third installment, go 140 minutes to discover that Harry Potter had a godfather who was believed guilty but then is that he is innocent (go man), and that the real culprit is the rat of Ron, is fairly insubstantial. The plot and history are too flimsy to conclude that we we have a great fantastic film, despite the strength that give off many of his images and the laudable attempt to Cuarón to achieve a progression regarding the two previous films. It is intended that the third act the Potter saga acquires a darker tone, with testosterone making mischief in the budding teen age of its protagonists. We see Harry or Hermione hitting punching drop some other typical cry of acne, faced his uncle and the teachers, but with these gestures is she cannot talk of further development or complexity of the characters since they constitute the leitmotif on which basis a distinction with respect to the previous, but we cannot talk of any development. The only thing that could have saved the pitfall of a story so flimsy and repetitive with respect to provided in his two preceding (change of a child tone to a more teenager tone does any progression if history and context does not encourage the development of the characters itself.) Make sure the reader that the film insists on the subject of always: search by part of Harry, of the past and his real family), would be that Cuarón achieved to make your visual expressiveness was in an adequate match of the dramatic content of the history. But to this end, the gaze of Cuarón is too cold and impersonal. No mistake: Cuaron offers us a genuine look and staff own the universe "harrypotteriano" (from their physical elements and mitopoéticos), through its implementation in scene the environment and landscape. But is vulgar and repetitive in the flat dramatic: Harry, Hermione, Ron, and the remaining human background of the story, follow the same basic patterns in its precedents, are anecdotal and added costumes to the visual style, without consistency between this and that. And so there is no way to balance the product. Why "the Chamber of secrets" is a much more complete and balanced in its different strata film. Columbus is not - nor pretends to be him - an independent filmmaker. His sober style, following the classicism of Spielberg, combined quite well the expression and visual design with a story of mystery and Gothic horror very close to their characteristics.Cuarón, instead try to create poetry and Visual flourishes, but lacks the genius they possess the true authors of the seventh art: the ability to make visual poems inherent - concordant, sequential, parallel - to the deep beat the dramatic content or the meanings of the story. And what criteria used film critic to differentiate one from the other? How could prove that Cuarón visual resources are not properly conjugated with dramatic content?. Here we talked about the hermeneutics of art. It is somewhat intuitive, there are no fixed rules, it cannot be explained in ten lines. In any case, any spectator attentive and endowed with the necessary intuitive ability will see itself that "prisoner of Azkaban" is, at the bottom, and despite appearances, a film failed in relation to its claims.The magnificent use of the structure is its best asset, in any case. This is a film in which not enough or lack nothing in the course of the narrative. Even in the scenes on magical teachings (the classroom and the teachers), screenwriter and director managed to prevent were spare parts of filling - a defect common to the two previous deliveries - and work here integrated into the main reasons: the mystery of Sirius Black, the Dementors and fears of Harry Potter.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1081

Berto

Candida

muchocine

A movie for a laugh us and as not to cast any it tears, this woman's life has not been a bed of roses, but it is worth going to see.

The history of Candida could be any woman wrestler that life has given countless clubs and dislikes, who has been compelled to move forward by his sons, a struggle for survival.The film tells the life of Candida and their children, a mug, a misguided daughter, a drug addict and a schizophrenic, four jewels will, but she always gives the face by them and tries to help them until the end. This film reflects the life of a slum of Madrid and of the typical building "officially protected" as the protagonist tells us, we must highlight the performance of Candida, for my splendid, while almost no it can read or write, showing, as he has done throughout his life, that, with effort, everything is possible. The cast is headed by the protagonist Candida Villar which embodies if same, for my does a great job and also had to make a big effort to learn scripts. Then this Raúl Peña which gives life to the Candida, Javi, drug addict son whose goal in life is to be a singer, but the drug is always in the middle. This series as A step forward or SMS, actor on the small screen dares in this film with a difficult to interpret as the politoxicomano role.Another of the protagonists is George Bosh, giving life, in a way different to the reality, to William Fresser. Paul, Jorge Bosh, it is a news presenter who has the good fortune to find in his life with Candida, which makes him see the small things in life. Finally I must mention the characters where Candida will clean, the owners of these homes; to the marquises, the doorman of the building or the writer, giving the film more touches of humor. To highlight the soundtrack, because both choose to start and finish a song performed by David Broza and the great Jorge Drexler on the little things, those that Candida is only to see the people.Only say that it is a film for a laugh us and as not to cast any it tears, that this woman's life has not been a bed of roses, but it deserves going to see her.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/451

Kiko de España

Supersonic man

muchocine

Supersonic Man needs no phone booths, just has to push a button of your reloj-calculadora to one euro and say: that the strength of the galaxies is with me. CCU!

This Spanish film supposed homeland response to the "Superman" Donner. Where do I start? Kronos is a masked alien who carries a black fardahuevos and is sent to Earth by a distant relative of Jor - the. Flies with a song of Abba (or almost) and the credits are as phosphorescent that shit is not read.When it reaches the Earth calls Paul and has moustache. A very bad man named Dr.Gulik (clavadito to Captain Kirk of Star Trek, he dresses like, combs is equal and has the same fucking complexion) kidnaps a scientist from the elderly to steal a formula. This uses a robot that is a mixture of the robot bad Robocop and Inigo of great Hermano.Supersonic Man should avoid it.Our hero, so that I could see, is invincible. unless you legolpeen in the neck by surprise, that lets you KO (!), like fly in circles and made overwhelming demonstration of power. opening doors. CCU!Supersonic Man needs no phone booths, just has to push a button of your reloj-calculadora to one euro and say: that the strength of the galaxies is with me. CCU! Oh, I forgot. If you are at the bottom of the sea, enclosed in a SAC and surrounded by sharks file, can also speak!!The first (and trapidantes) five minutes, in which occurs the attack and kidnapping, seem to be one of those infomercials Pascual who gave for years on TV. The bad launch rays leiser.As it is Spanish and takes place (i.e. a) in New York, all the bad guys are called Harrison, Peterson, Harrison, or any other name that ends in On.Sale Quique Camoiras. There is a drunk that comes everytime there to do a typical joke. Quique Camoiras is great in his cameo making jokes of stuttering, high comedy. There is a fight of the old, which are cool, just missing Terence Hill and Bud Spencer.El bad is so bad that quote Shakespeare or Julius Caesar (I mean that he cites the two phrases, not to stay with them in a pub) Supersonic Man lifts tractors of papier-mache being written Acme on the side. The battle against the robot, spectacular climax, resolves the Supersonic Man. giving a flying kick.Might I be so for days, three pages of notes for the movie. Worse even than "UV" but infinitely more fun. A 2. (But you spend a fucking).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4228

Bruji

En el valle de Elah

muchocine

Do following in the footsteps of?Flags of our fathers?, Paul Haggis returns to show the power of a snapshot in times of war.

As the best "Missing" Jack Lemmon, Tommy Lee Jones looking for his son in a moving tape that blends the complexity of the police thriller with a certain portrait on generational differences. Following in the footsteps of "Flags of our fathers", Paul Haggis returns to show the power of a snapshot in times of war. "...""And, with five stones, King Saul sent David to fight against the giant Goliat in the Valley of Elah." in an interview prior to the 2006 Oscar ceremony, the Canadian director Paul Haggis said that the worst thing that can be done to a filmmaker is said of one of his films which was"nice". "What I want - he added - is to make the controversy to jump to the street and create dissension". Go, from this diary, my most sincere congratulations November screenwriter, since that is an aim fully complied with from the moment in which his film cross American borders. Away from them, know the history that gives title to this tape, it involves trying to discover, from the outset, who will be the David in the Valley of Elah with sky the stars of the European Union. In this quest, the reflection of the Biblical character ventures into the figure of a young policeman, challenging the lack of respect and the malicious comments from peers, knows to redirect an investigation for sake of the faithful fulfillment of employment that does not consider professional career, get to the truth. It looms up in wasteful courage of a father that combining intuition and cunning to not falter, manages to defeat the devious heights of bureaucracy. But what no screenwriter, producer or director of holiday at sea can pretend is to show the European Viewer that David is the American soldier who is sent by his country's Government "to bring democracy to an unclean territory", without resources or experience, to return with the broken life. It should not be confused. Or to the cinema or to American society it covers them already the eternal mantra of the Viet Nam, in which nineteen year olds entered a contest like all others and pointless, to descend to about hell in those who never asked to be. The American troops stationed in Iraq are professionals, and no Government mismanagement (which, undoubtedly, is the origin of evil), any society that allows the performance of the first giving his confidence in the polls, no personal status, they serve as excuses for anything. Nor to star shameful snapshots collected during wartime that configured one of the plots that govern the argument. Simply cannot justify the unjustifiable, and allow you we closer to the lambs defined by Robert Redford on his latest tape (Lions for Lambs, 2007). Of course, experience in the Valley of Elah, as well as incomplete, would be failed if not had managed to look in multiple directions in which makes it an expert knowledge of human nature, with their actions and reactions expressed in the intimate gathering of intense moments and solemn sequences, inheritance of the Eastwood teacher. The tree does not contemplate the profusion of a forest, insistently, launched depth charges to the whole, the wake that buried myths and invests symbols learned in flags of our fathers. Haggis, which us seems more relevant after the keyboard than after the cameras, opted for the classic realization of abundant American planes, linear structure in the development of the narrative, perfect back-story of the well shaped characters, introduction of successful flashbacks. And surprise dosage information through distorted images that are collected by the camera of a mobile phone, sometimes owners of a rallante realism in the mockumentary technique. It does not exempt the typical American topics which reach to the script in the complex phase of the police investigation, headed by the most absolute inefficiency, that it leads to the emergence of individual interventions. Close to the history of Costa-Gavras (Missing, 1982), to portray the society from a different generational perspectives. Denunciadora, to the purest style of Crash of the inter-racial problems. Prosperous and generous in the scenes of action and a memorable soundtrack; the major asset of the Valley lies in its powerful cast in the outstanding performances of the eternal Tracker Tommy Lee Jones of the always perfect Susan Sarandon. Thus, by joining to the unsurpassed Charlize Theron in his claim that "everyone thinks of everything", and with the conviction that "not should send heroes to places such as Iraq", nor to any other site; predict - not without reservations - the latest creation by Haggis will reflect those who still lions still believe.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2556

Rafa Ferrer

Locos por el surf

muchocine

Just a summer surprise that as an excuse to always take the kids to the movies, we can see the biggest and amazed at well done that is.

Both a server and another critic Muchocine.net who accompanied me to the press pass we went quite disheartened to this media, in fact, in some moments pass us burlábamos the recent fashion to films with penguins (animal I love), but it appears a persistent lack of ideas in the industry, in fact at some point confundiamos Happy Feet and cute penguins of Madagascar with these other birds actors.However, once starts the tape, with the soundtrack of Greenday one begins to quickly feel in tune with the protagonists, to fall in history, already laughing over and over again (with strange and nothing stupid jokes), with everything what we have on screen.Already commented that neat animation of water, as the fur of the penguins touches both the realism and the most perfect perfection, and is, there is no doubt that the liquid element is perhaps the most dificl translated as animation digital is concerned, times are moving is a lot, no doubt.History, with its final moralina is well reflected, and the characters have all something to tell us, from Cody the protagonist until Nice chicken surfer accompanying, sometimes made us smile in others make us shudder us and even detract from our eyes, well, we all have in one way or another our heart.Just a summer surprise that as an excuse to always take the kids to the movies, we can see the biggest and amazed at well done that is.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/266

Bloody Will

Las colinas tienen ojos

muchocine

It is perhaps the best version that has become of a horror film in the last five years, no doubt the horror film with a capital of the summer

Certainly, when a few years ago Wes Craven directed this film, I doubt very much that would be influenced by getting a hit at the box office. Previously, this type of film, fear and bloody, had a very specific audience. Now tries to open the fork as much as possible, so that an adult, as well as a 16 years old kid going gang to the movies to see. The spark that had the original version is lost and becomes a palomitero product for those who has stomach, clear.Of course this version of "The hills have eyes" is infinítamente superior to the version of "The massacre of Texas", and that joke was "The House of wax", here nobody cut hair, and occasionally touches the brutality (Aaron Stanford covered with blood), but that does not make it an essential film. That Yes, is the horror film with a capital of the summer, no doubt.If you like blood to GLUGs, going to enjoy, because here the liquid runs with an extreme joy. The story is easy: ua family en route through the desert to California just by taking a shortcut that takes them to an area inhabited by humans altered by nuclear radiation who only know how to kill, rape or cut each unhappy which is crossed on his way. Well, father, mother, teen, teenage daughter, eldest daughter, husband of eldest daughter and baby make up this pretty absent-minded family as divertimento for such children of his mother. The cast is full of side recurring, such as Aaron Stanford (Pyro of the "X-Men"), Emilie Ravin (Claire from "Lost"), Kathleen Quinlan ("Apollo 13 ″") or Ted Levine ("memoirs of a Geisha"), and at least the director Uwe Boll. It is a stranger Alexandre Aja, which has sweetened the original.There are two minutes of footage the director cut to be able to be rated R in the USA. I would like to know that they will, but probably the DVD will include them as extras. If they are more beasts than some of the scenes of the final Assembly, I prefer not to see them. This movie is not boring, but if disturbing, sometimes unpleasant, but perhaps it is because to be so acosumbrados to versions light and descafeinadas terror productions, has been a success at the box office in the USA. No wonder it is perhaps the best version that has a horror film made in the last five years. Even so, and as I said before, you can avoid running to see her to the cinema and wait its premiere on DVD to get close to a cushion, or even pause to avoid spontaneous indigestion.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3440

Francisco Bellón

Luz de Domingo

muchocine

Sunday light is the weaker film José Luis Garci has signed over several years, not being this obstacle so proved us once again his extraordinary mastery of the language and cinematic storytelling.

The film, like life, is full of injustices big and small, and one of them is that not is measured with the same yardstick. You can also pass by circumstances extraneous to the same film, a filmmaker or an actor fall into misfortune or subjected to swingeing and unjustified attacks. This has happened to one of our greatest conductors such as José Luis Garci, who remember won the first Oscar for the film Spanish makes a whopping 27 years.With light Sunday, Garci is closed call "Asturian trilogy", which began with the magnificent You are the One followed by an even more extraordinary story of a kiss. And to be honest, with similar precedents, Domingo light is situated in an absolutely unequal confrontation that has just clearly losing. That does not mean that, regardless, Sunday light is not a good movie, whose main defect are the ups and downs in its history. The most critical Garci will be honing knives, but this defect not can preparations are you only to him, because if the history of Pérez de Ayala was adventures, he has still managed to significantly improve. And it is that the story gains integers in the moments in which speaks of the tyranny, while low in the most romantic sequences, occasionally reaching the kitsch. The loss of intensity may also be due in part to the presence of Paula Echevarría, yet softer and less interpretative qualities than Elsa Pataky. The counterpoint put him about Alfredo Landa and Carlos Larrañaga, master that fill the screen in each appearance, starring in a stage duel of height in the sequences that coincide together. The technical work of the tape is simply magnificent, from the picture of Raúl Pérez Cubero to the artistic direction of Gil Parrondo. And above all, the extraordinary leadership of José Luis Garci, who many should criticize less and learn more about him.Sunday light is the weaker film José Luis Garci has signed over several years, not being this obstacle so proved us once again his extraordinary mastery of the language and cinematic storytelling.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3064

Andrés Pons

La extraña que hay en tí

muchocine

I think it is not surprising to say that Neil Jordan carries out its work with the great Office assumed but little more, good photography and a technically immaculate film that suffers from a very little credible script.

We return to one of the most hackneyed themes of the film in its history, the eye for an eye, the vengeance is treated from serie b more exploited either male or female violence sex, TRILLER A CRUEL PICTURE, Filmography of CHARLES BRONSON, etc.Not everything is serie b but then for example in is occasion presents us a director of first level "Irish NEIL JORDAN signatory of wonderful titles, in the company of wolves, the crying game" starring a star recently specialized in roles of strong women that the latest releases of JODIE FOSTER is facing all kinds of dangers. The room of panic or flight plan gave greatest hits.The side include TERRENCE HOMARD "The revelation of CRASH" or MARY STEENBURGEN "PHILADELPHIA".I think it is not surprising to say that NEIL JORDAN carries out its work with the great Office assumed but little more, good photography and a technically immaculate film that suffers from a very little credible script.The transformation that suffers the character of FOSTER not believes the own actress be a fearful woman ending after a couple of crimes being a mixture of CLINT EASTWOOD and CHARLES BRONSON with sententious phrases included. How will quietly shooting happily through the streets where does not appear or only one agent of the law and nobody sees is really science fiction.Later topics, a witness who refuses to discover it, the police actually is pleased that someone clean the streets. Precisely the best moments are when FOSTER not wielding the gun, his radio monologues have great strength. Unfortunately, the set is totally failed and even very boring moments.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2028

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Domino

muchocine

Telefilm loose budget which does not deserve to be included in the Filmography of this man. Finally and after he made the fire of revenge and the great red tide. Love at point-blank range on my altar of weaknesses, occupies a prominent place.

It has already opened the Circus: pass, see, sit, enjoy the Vertigo and out conveniently discounted concerns, manumitidos stubborn routine machinery, comfortably installed in the deception. Cinema has always been a fabulous factory of deception. There are films that produce a greater certainty that the lie has occupied our senses and that, in the end, we have swallowed a tremebundo roll, a playful Epiphany of fireworks, a three-dimensional celebration of noise. This is Tony Scott, a magician of the noise. Below late, sharp, the fury, the pulse of a director too often ninguneado, but vigilant jealous of an ancestral form of making films, the show a hypnotic spectacle, a real party of barracks of fair. Its suggestive images Fireworks is still luxurious, but then nothing is left or is so little time, severe judge, just deleting profiles (first) and those dazzling images (later).Scott is a Baroque author, but his hyperbolic warp of concepts and forms not seduces as I would like or as his talent would suspect because the film of this director is a tiresome, very lyrical wit sobreimpregnado, Yes, but become the abuse in a parody in a cartoon not reaching the grotesque, although round it and is not difficult to predict that drowned therein to the satisfaction absolute for the Legion of fans who has eventually.Many shots, the abundant load of adrenaline, light eroticism and the frenetic sense of rhythm make Domino a work one hundred percent Tony Scott. The history of the eventful life of Domino Harvey suits this tsunami of technical tricks, of aesthetic videoclipera of pop resonance. Writes Richard Kelly, writer of the cult of Donnie Darko tape, but what attracts is the psychedelic movement of the camera, that seems touched by the numen of the mescaline put the protagonists. Mickey Rourke wins the admiration of the owner of the seat because it's credible: more by his look of pimp with bad milk that for its efforts to make us see that there is still an actor inside your brain crushed by boxing and narcotic drugs.Christopher Walken is Christopher Walken which is nothing new, but we thank him always. This accelerated biopic should be viewed with complete lack of cinematographic requirements: as a disk of the ear of Van Gogh hear when we have already been in Dark Side of the Moon. I don't know if I can explain. There is time for everything. If not there, should waive the gentle reader of this excessive exercise of ego kept.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4176

Carlos Giacomelli Puig

El hombre con rayos X en los ojos (The man with X-ray eyes)

muchocine

Original and risky (for the time), which includes several genera, and consisting of some moments of fun more fused with each other terribly cumbersome.

The classic debate of the topic of the superpowers: if I have them, do I take them to good, or just the opposite? In this film, Dr. James Xavier (Ray Milland) discovers a drops that give her X-ray eyes, and can thus see through anything put you in front.In his case, no doubt, you want to use the gift to see through skin and meat of their patients. It should not be forgotten that the film is 1963, and technical resources that were available at that time were rather more limited than now.As always, before a character equipped with benign powers that improves the human condition (at whatever level), is humanity itself who rejects him. It is something that the pupils of Professor Xavier (I mean this time Charles, of the X-Men), Spider-Man, or the very American Justice League, happens to them from almost the first moment of its existence. The causes can be many, but primarily tends to be out of fear or envy. Who wouldn't want be invisible, climb the walls, or faster than a bullet?The trigger in "the man with" is simple. A patient is about to be operated by one of the most renowned doctors of the hospital. However, when our James notes it, he discovers that the diagnosis is wrong, and that requires another type of treatment. He saves the life, but it is obvious that entering the brava in an operating room, making a cut where it isn't, having crippled the doctor to convince him, is not too well seen, and when called to meet with his superior, makes an unfortunate and terrible mistake. The Tin of Thunder is now open. From now on you will have to earn a living secretly, in circuses, and using false names ("pass and see Mentalo, man who reads the mind").But that is not the only problem facing our unfortunate hero. The human soul, full of good intentions, is still easily corruptible. Erotic power here takes all its meaning. With a drop of the drops (which by the way, the same doctor calls it "X", remainder of the beater) get to see through a role. Two, through the clothes. With three of the walls. And so on. So that what begins as an experiment just becoming an addiction without limits, until the point to destroy the pupils and turn itself into a genuine threat.In the final section of the film, the protagonist gets to see the insides of the universe, and is a vision that can not stand, so far as boot, in the last frame of the film, the eyes. There are things for which humanity is not yet ready.As for the film itself, "X: The Man with the X-Rays Eyes" is 1963 and Roger Corman (known as one of the most sparing directors to make films), therefore relatively poor visually (attention to the skeletons at the feast: does not move even one, while in fact they are in full and hyperactive bellacon). That Yes, the colouring is amazing anytime. It is an original bet and risky (for the time), which includes several genera, and consisting of some moments of fun more fused with each other terribly cumbersome. It is very short (less than one hour and a quarter) and is determined with solvency by a mythical and tanning director at Serie B.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4170

Carlos Giacomelli Puig

John Rambo

muchocine

The savagery which proposes Sly is so free violent entertainment as absolutely brilliant. Hour and a half of pure fun that Yes, very, very tainted blood.

After a long pause (over 15 years), Sylvester Stallone returns to tie the Red bow on the front in what is the fourth installment of "Rambo". As it already did recently with "Rocky Balboa", Sly is also responsible for writing and directing the roost.In a paragraph landscape of Thailand, Rambo WINS life hunting snakes to be sold to circuses and tourist attractions of the area. His life passes quietly until that a group of missionaries hires him to take up river to Burma, because they intend to distribute medication to one of peoples who suffer from attacks of the fearsome army of the place. As you would expect, the group is captured, so the heroic soldier, together with a group of mercenaries hired to do so, must return to take up machine gun and machete to rescue them.Few will certainly not be who come to this proposal with the few eyebrows were raised. What can offer at this point a fourth part of something so already by themselves exhausted and overcome by the passage of years? And lest we forget, the good of Sly has already sixty-two years, will not be too withered to these trotes?Well, the answer to the first question is as simple as opposed: everything and nothing.Nothing, because if what one expects from a film so is a minimum of plot coherence, or the slightest existence of a fairly elaborate script, you can go from long of it. It is completely impossible to take "John Rambo" seriously, because in that way it could be seen even an attack for the seventh art.Plot rather than predictable, flat and absurdly archetypal characters, deliberately Manichean situations, are just some of the constants of the film that will surely put the willies to anyone who contributes to this.But it is that this movie is aimed at those who also understand film as entertainment, those who know how to distinguish between art and entertainment, because ultimately embraces them both equally. Go, who know how to enjoy a good session palomitera.Because the savagery which proposes Sly is so free violent entertainment as absolutely brilliant. "Hour and a half of pure fun that Yes, very, very stained blood.""John Rambo" is a survival as in days gone by, with very good good and bad very bad, with incredible and exciting shot action scenes with strong pulse, and the is not perceived shame when it comes to decapitate, open channel, strangle, violate, or to blow up human bodies.For a long time that American cinema dared not brand new products so we (the most recent test are in the sweetened "4.0 jungle"), but it is that "John Rambo" does not stop to be an update of the 1980s action film, goes much further, becoming a show totally gore to meet even the early work of Peter Jackson or Sam Raimi as hemoglobin refers. Prodigy is achieved thanks to a few special effects extremely visceral, able to turn any extra who appears on screen (literally) in a rain of blood and guts.As to whether Stallone is capable of keeping the rate or not, suffice to say that half of dialogues with the other actors are reduced to monosyllabic with eyes glassy and lost in the horizon. But what more gives? John Rambo has become more explicitly violent and ruthless than ever, and that is what really matters.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1245

Yojimbo

Bienvenido a casa

muchocine

I had more than one incentive to see this movie: Pilar López de Ayala was the first of them.

I had more than one incentive to see this movie: Pilar López de Ayala was the first of them. And it was inescapable, it would be anyway. Then it was the good Office of David Trueba as a screenwriter and a cast that promised. So why not see her? I think they are more than sufficient reasons and for many, quite powerful.Making the sentence of the director case "lately we are approaching the film with too much data, with the film seen in advance, and we need to eliminate the value of names, approaching the films with the senses and not with the trajectory of the people, and judging the film as the opening credits more", what I will write about the movie will be this: the film is a comedy urban, labor, and philosophical. It is a generational portrait, a story about the transition to the adult world: responsibilities, friendships, life partner, etc? and see how life in those moments. Humor is a very present, in addition to being the most successful and the most grateful. Filosófico-poético part - pessimistic is the weaker a movie part, but not the quality or the good time that makes you spend it lowers. One highly recommended film.Welcome home is a great title very well used in this film, but much better applied to real life, where many welcome to good movies like this.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/507

Silvia Giner

Misión imposible 3

muchocine

In general and in the style of the series, I think this is the best of the three.

At this stage of the game nobody will wait to see a normalita movie right? I must confess I follower of the series and deeply disappointed with the 2nd delivery, which seemed pathetic not to mention the infumable peleita with the motorcycle-style Power Rangers.Pero to those who like me were left with bad taste in the mouth, I have to encourage them to see the 3rd part is very but very well.Let's see gentlemen, if you are going to see any of deliveries of I do not expect to find films "Real" that this kind of Screen Play has a lot of fantastic. This is a caption that I have addressed all the buds that went to the premiere of MI-II in the "Palacio de la Música" (Madrid) and did not stop laughing and make comments on high such as "come fuck thats a fantasmada". OK friends, will be a fantasmada or not, but what is certain is that if I want to see social realism I'm going to see "The Monday a Sun" and not a film, commercial, product of masses and we already know that it is highly exaggerated.That said, I come: MI - III which fortunately not directed the Sr.Woo. It is perhaps the most human of the three installments. The actors are all very well. Descrubrimos part one time more, repeat, "Humana" of the IMF (impossible mission force) Agency and since then we discover the true side of our prota (already it was time) which is very interesting and novel. Heads that are wrong, the value of friendship (as beautiful), the struggle for an ideal.I did not like anything the beginning type Tarantino that what happens when this kind of technique is not used well is that you get a crappy, which is in my opinion what is loaded you movie and when you see her you know why. But in general and in the style of the series, I think this is the best of the three.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3927

Iñaki Bilbao

Juego sucio

muchocine

Film sound master Hitchcock and a good film, no doubt.

"In the early 1930s England, a new rich wants to lend their land to an old marriage who promised to let them in the House." However, the wealthy has changed your mind because you want all the lands around in order to build factories. So will pollute the above-mentioned lands.The old couple attends the Patriarch of a family there installed since time immemorial and they ask for help. "Since that time, will begin to be made by almost all the people involved in the process, a game of how dirty that will stain your hands forever".Film sound master Hitchcock and a good film, no doubt.Premiered, and circuits almost almost of arthouse in 1982, reportedly in a retrospective of the genius in his English stage.Note that it is a play, even in the recitation of certain interpreters, which is genuinely endearing. But it is well done and contains various notes forms and methods used throughout his career have nowadays where can envision.The best example of this is the long and excellent scene of the auction of the land where you want the wealthy build factories that pollute the environment. There is an intensity out of the ordinary, only with looks and gestures, getting a difficult to overcome tension climax. And all this, let us not forget, in the year 1931.Por else, be well remains at all times entertaining and at times even passionate.In its should what I have already said, there are times that some performers declaman and force the voice and gestures as if they were in the theater, something to as did Fernando Fernán Gómez in the excellent "The voyage to nowhere".To highlight the superb performance (there are some point that also sobreactuúa) of the masterful and always missed protagonist of our "Calabuch", by Berlanga, Edmund good Gwenn.Una movie you can see today, seventy-three years after its completion, without disappoint the least.That Yes, I am very sorry I can not help it, think anyone that sees in screen continues live, all performers some time ago already died.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/364

Emilio Calvo de Mora

United 93

muchocine

Meticulous, precise, desalambicado cinema of winks to your business efficiency, but necessary.

The machinery of Hollywood has no mercy with the blood of their children. When we are witnessing, disturbed, shocked to the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center, knew that he would soon appear a film narrase, between the restraint that deserves respect for the victims and some daring to make the proper nod to the box office, the ups and downs of the very serious events on board the aircraft.They have been slow, but here it is, along with the 11-S project, Word Trade Center, given birth by Oliver Stone, so excessive always with the history of his country, Platoon, JFK, Nixon, although in this case, as we have said, eaten by an unusual meekness, clean edges and sincere, objective almost, in the narrative discourse.The hard candy deal with this film is awarded to Paul Greengrass, director of the blockbuster the Bourne myth, but also architect of films more draught social like Omagh or Bloody Sunday, films who also narrated real developments in the most violent Ireland. What obvious Yes Greengrass is the pamphlet: does not fall into any dogmatism, does not look for the easy tear, does not insist on the brutality of the terrorists. What does and, in my opinion, very accurately, is a thanks still life of the victims, whose tragic end we know nothing else turned off the lights in the projection room.Flight 93 United Airlines became the fourth damaged aircraft in the 11-s. know nothing for sure on the experience of its occupants. There are telephone conversations now exits to the light, but nothing that can be considered truthful. Greengrass, screenwriter of the matter, wheel a worthy documentary.The succulent catastrophic Philo raised by American cinema over the past three decades has, inadvertently, a sad milestone in this United 93, although well would be that it was not well and show that we are witnessing is not but pure fiction, narrative figurative. Concise script, Greengrass pulls a virtually unknown cast. This cultural decontamination suits your message: that what we see is a crude brochazo of recent history, perhaps the less manageable by the American people.Those seeking thrills, have in this film his movie. One of them: one based on arguments that are very directly themselves, even though the flight is American and all know that Hollywood, when touch you your chord is a major film school. Meticulous, precise, desalambicado cinema of winks to your business efficiency, but necessary.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1078

Mary Carmen Rodriguez

Babel

muchocine

It is not only one of the great films of the year, the best end of year film that we could get, but that is one of the best films of recent years, you hit, you removed, you move.

Alejandro González Iñárritu presents Babel, the third episode of the trilogy about the human soul, after the excellent Amores Perros (passion) and 21 grams (loss) two tapes that its own right have become representatives of the best films of recent years. This episode talks about the incommunicado detention and the compassion and new director faces their characters to the tragedy and connect directly or indirectly.In Babel fortuitous shot is the core of the story, an American couple formed by Susan and Richard (Cate Blanchett and Brad Pitt) carried out a tourist trip by Morocco to try to overcome a crisis, two Moroccan children playing with a rifle and they shoot at a bus wounding Susan, meanwhile, in United States the nanny, an immigrant Mexican (Adriana Barraza)want to attend the wedding of his son which takes place in Mexico, as the accident happened in Morocco has made it impossible to find a substitute, you risk with children cross the border in the company of his nephew (Gael García Bernal), finally in Tokyo, Chieko a young deaf (Rinko Kikuchi), traumatized by her mother's suicide, looking for a man to lose his virginity and discovers that his father is being already investigated that the rifle It was owned by him. This tape live in five languages, English, French, Spanish, Arabic and Japanese so see it dubbed version would lose its meaning so here recommend search projections that are in original version.The origin.Babel not only closes a trilogy, but that means the end of the relationship between two of the geniuses who have emerged in recent years that are responsible for a way of making films that has influenced other filmmakers, on the one hand, the director Alejandro González Iñárritu and on the other the screenwriter Guillermo Arriaga. The official reason, Arriaga wants to fly solo and switch to the direction, the unofficial reason, González Iñárritu has had enough of the writer that requires to be present throughout the creative process of a film, from now we will have to see how González Iñárritu wheel without the support of the scripts of Arriaga and how the writer unfolds after the cameras.As in Amores Perros and 21 grams, González Iñárritu returned to disestablishment mounting history making a puzzle but to a lesser extent than in their previous titles something that was just thanking. But still beating the Viewer to show as few tear of the characters, I will give three examples but there are many more, Richard the character played by Brad Pitt in the hospital with his woman's life hanging by a thread and talking on the phone with her little boy and trying unsuccessfully to avoid crying, Amelia, the Mexican babysitter on the verge of exhaustion trying to seek help to cross the border with fatal consequences, and finally Cheiko trying to keep his first sexual encounter with the police that investigates his father. Also returns to prove that it is an excellent director of actors, if in Amores Perros, we discovered Gael García Bernal and showed us the Canarian Goya Toledo is a superb and missed actress like few and made three great actors of the stature of Sean Penn, Naomi Watts and Benicio del Toro shimmering as they had never done in 21 gramsin Babel it brings together three consecrated stars such as Gael García Bernal, Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett, with virtually unknown actors such as the Mexican Adriana Barraza or Japanese Rinko Kikuchi and with non-professional actors as children causing Moroccans of the accident, all of them make an extraordinary job, protruding Barraza, Kikuchi and an impressive Brad Pitt who moves from her first scenea simple conversation partner on the terrace of a bar, has never been better.The despair.Since last may, date in which Babel was presented at the Cannes Festival, where González Iñárritu won the award for best director, was eager to watch this movie and saw no time in which reached our billboards, now that I've finally seen I noticed that has been worth the wait because no doubt Babel is not just one of the great films of the yearthe best final year film that we could receive, but it is one of the best films of recent years, you hit, you removes, moves you and tells you that everyone on this planet is interconnected and that to accept that we must learn to communicate.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2899

Naty Buqué

El perfume

muchocine

The film adapts very well Süskind novel in several ways. It is a very successful film without being - or try to be - revolutionary or even rupture, and excellent aesthetic care.

If the perfume, Tom Twykwer, fails to be a great movie to my taste, (because of eccentricities, rants, something to really draw attention to in the narrative level and the fall in some other cliché in the script - that did not appear in the novel-; certain setting errors that occasionally bothered), would get annoying and pettifogging if not assume that it is a 1-very successful film(((, without being - or try to be so - revolutionary and even rupture, 2-excellent in aesthetic care, above all in what it does to a) camera, b) election and characterization of actors and c) choice / creation of locations - even at this level if, as I said, some that another error.1-the film very adaptable Süskind novel in several ways. Firstly, the voiceover adds, moves and deepens the story without becoming unbearably recurrent and abusive. The Narrator, on the other hand, does a great job. Secondly, times are very well measured, and the film, covering a period of time and a series of very large incidents, never bored, never rushing, never lacks or enough you information. Thirdly, there is a great deal of respect but not blind, dogmatic for the novel, which is faithfully followed, with the necessary changes for optimum adaptation to the screen (and fidelity I am only interested in the level of ethics and not the reproduction of everything that happens, clear). What is important, I think, is not betray what says the work, or, do, do so explicitly. ((The novel, in this sense, no appeals to a negative moral evaluation of the murderer, and that seems to me that it is respected in the adaptation).2-a) beyond the beauty of certain levels and, above all, of certain camera moves, there is a very interesting use of the same (parallel to the use of certain literary resources on the novel)((, what is eloquent about the success of the adaptation): the camera as subjective, but in this case, not reproducing what the character sees but transforming, as in a delirium sinestésico, what it smells like in image b) another success in an adaptation not stupidly tied to the original: the protagonist of Süskind is ugly, horrible, deformed and disgusting. The film, without being a beauty, it is a normal guy - up with some attractive-, except for a slight limp when walking. It is true that this is a step backwards in the inquiry that makes the text about the beauty, but however, it seems to say the film that Grenouille anyway is ugly because it is poor. And that is also interesting. Por_otro_lado, the beauty of the girls is also very well achieved: without being perfect, have a particular beauty, hypnotic. c) the House of the perfumer in the middle of the bridge and the popular market levels are fa-bu-lo-sos (errors, today we are good, better not to mention).And add another point, perhaps not on the film but as proof of the excellent aesthetic care of the film: the posters. Very different each other, all beautiful, are also a great - and laudable, because nothing have to do with ideological hegemony or economic domain - marketing tactic.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1683

Matías Cobo

300

muchocine

Voluntarily away all realism and assuming completely present in the comic-style, 300 offers two hours of bloody battles, artistic forcible any limbs and heads, but, first and foremost, a surprising visual result.

Frank Miller, renewer of the comic book in the late 1980s and one of the consecrated geniuses of the ninth art along with the legend of the Alan Moore graphic novel, begins to envision a new future for the pairing to vignettes and celluloid are starring in recent years: "with 'Without City' and '300' arises a kind of hybrid film." I love the energy that provides animation. And that, coupled with the visceral impact of the actors, manages a good combination. (?) It could be a long 'affair' which has become marriage. (?) Earlier, normal was that comics expoliasen. They kept the name, but the 'movie' could go up by a parody of the comic book. "It is time for my trade out of the jungle and take its place alongside other art forms".I would add to the words of Miller that within this boom of translations of the comics to the movies might be a gradation to the already established in the comics for years: separating the adult comic strip from the rest of comic books aimed at a mainstream of heterogeneous ages. Thus, if on the one hand, they would be created mainstreams to destroy the box office with titles like Spiderman, Superman or Batman, on the other would suitable for adults only tapes based on cult comics such as the upcoming Watchmen, the sequel to Sin City and this 300. The objectives of both types, given the disparate financing requiring some and others, are very different: while some pursue considerable income that transcend the generated only by the film, the others, without renouncing the commercial success, born from the respect to the substance and form of the adapted work. And it is likely that they are much more profitable in the long run, judging by their content budgets.Without going any further, this adaptation of the succinct 300 comic has had a budget of around EUR 49 million and has already garnered 100 million in its first ten days of exhibition in North American cinemas. But in addition, focusing on strictly cinematic aspects, the result of this 'adaptación-traslación' is spectacular. Visual and arguably, the Ribbon is a calque of the mythical Miller comic. Shot entirely on the merits of a blue screen, used as a canvas to which then add creative funds arising from a Mac, the film captures perfectly the main virtues of the comic: the magnification of heroism in the battle of Thermopylae between a handful of hardened Spartans against the huge army of the Persian Empire.Voluntarily away all realism and assuming completely present in the comic-style, 300 offers two hours of bloody battles, artistic forcible any limbs and heads, but, first and foremost, a surprising visual result than the apt director Zack Snyder (the dawn of the dead, Watchmen?) has the primary responsibility. It is also faithful to the discursive line maintained during the comic book: the stubborn resistance of Sparta against the unstoppable Persian expansion was the last hope that democracy and freedom citizen perviviesen in Greece. This 300 is a risky play that Snyder could only have initialled so successfully. You would recommend to those who are willing to embark on an emotional epic tale with an absolutely innovative aesthetic and without waiting for any concession to the conventions of the genre.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/699

Tito Chinchan

Cabeza de perro

muchocine

The history feature has no interest too. In fact almost nothing happens throughout the film, and if it was not Mr crossbow, this would be an infumable truño.

Today I read a magazine these youth came out in front the Juan José Ballesta this, and made him a very funny interview. Among the pearls that came to say, one was "I signed autographs up in tits", although it has made me more funny one that said "Assume Me his cock watching my movies". I guess that this not be her there will be tronchado.The movie is Samuel who is 18 years old and a very rare brain disease, epilepsy type. Parents you have always had overprotected, rightly, but upon reaching the age of majority decides to go with her cousin to the beach. Total, that whatever appears in the capital living alone and adapting to life without parents. And the thing goes on between voice-overs rather caused.Look, the movie not be or criticize. In fact almost nothing happens throughout the film, and if it was not Mr crossbow, this would be an infumable truño. But as leaving him because the thing has its pass. History that have is not too interested, it's just the life of a kid that has the problem that in the head, but otherwise they are always of housing, work and sex or love problems. The theme of voice-overs, as I have already said, usually I like a lot, seems to me very abusive and stole the little pace he could have the film. On the positive side, the role of the grandfather that appears, I also note that found me a very good job. But nothing, the movie is funny but little else.In short, a typical Spanish film movie that adds much and would not leave see too well. Few things saved it from burning.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4221

José A. Peig

Rambo (Acorralado II)

muchocine

A good film that preserves the values and the uniqueness of the character, strong in technical resources, but somewhat irregular and rough.

Pure action and also war cinema unceremoniously film. Let's start with a proposal and a reflection; We are subject to the discretion of the blog, here are not worth the personal tastes, but objectively assess (heh, laugh you, who writes this will take their idealism to death), if analyzed film has — or non - artistic and intellectual values, moreover, should be put them in their corresponding value. Action movies don't like very much around here, and we maintain that - in general - is the film genre in the US is more difficult encontrarle.valores, transcendence. There are film miracles as Die Hard, but the rest seems (seem, illusion, chimera) a thing of artillery, noises and stereotypical characters. Okay, still not we have explored to fund this genre. And this blog is intended to be a great adventure of knowledge. Adelante.First Blood was a drama of hostilities physical and psychological violence that eclosionaba in a crushing of American society, and strongly critical view against the military institution. Bad aren't the homelands (all have one, like Rambo, Bohemian Wanderer very reluctantly) but that there is no place for the wisdom and sacrifice of a human being in such patriotic. This second part of the saga returns to put Rambo in a world that may never be part. Happy dialogue that closes the story: love a country, Yes. Die for him, Yes (the good soldier), but always and when part of a country (read part of a society, this goes to the us who have problems with the meaning and the value implicit in certain words used in according to what contexts), then say so, always and when part of a society involves more than economic interestspropaganda, lameculísticos (sorry). The value of human life, the consideration for the weak, with the surplus marginalized. Does anyone still believe that Rambo is a "tough guy"?. Then you see this movie without prejudice and will realize the fallacies that beside the point of this icon have been said. Rambo is a totemic explosion of brute force and savagery in the service of worthy causes. In this film is dedicated to kill and/or scare military, whether American or Russian (while protecting the locals). No matter the nationality nor the color, but the moral principles. Perhaps in this lies the deeper critique of the Western establishment: do not want symbols, or technology tip or propaganda apparatus if they are not grounded in moral and spiritual principles.Forget the blood and the value and leave it in the hands of technology. There is no action without an instinctive mind to Rambo. Marshal Murdock controls the machine, times have changed. Rambo is back just in the heart of the jungle, and has to survive the war, a war of silence, there are no enemies declared in a game of interests between the capitalist and Communist machinery. Rambo contrasts his mind (and its spiritual values) to the cold cruelty of technology (attention to the sequence in which Rambo destroys the great computer of the Marshal, symbolic act in which the Warrior reaffirms its superiority and contempt on the machine). We return to meet the struggle between civilization and wild romanticism.And following the exploration of the features that explain the magnetism of the iconic Apollonian body and long hair, if in the analysis of First Blood we accusation to the archetype of the hostile savage claiming historical roots, the kinematics and the body language of Rambo reminds us the mysticism of the American Indian, the romantic idea as akin to the counter-cultural movements; in this sense, essential to the sequence of the hero armed with the bow and the arrow running next to a waterfall, and then appears from the right part of the image the Thai military that soon begins to shoot against the run. After hiding among the rocks, are witnessing the most fulminant gesture: taking advantage of the nervousness of his rival - has run out of shrapnel - Rambo emerges from the rocks, it rises with the arch and his arrow points and stares at his rival, and this want - and this is crucial - but you can not shoot at the goal: the serene lip of the hero that paralyzes the mood of the rival and nullifies all their defenses. What matters is the mind. Subjectivity?. Non merluzos, review the scene in question and will see that the magnetism of the hero is expressed in the same film material. And not confuse us. Rambo is an icon imbued with a terse Primitivism (potentially ridiculous depending on the mental patterns of each, or simple and plain indifference), but in no way it is pointless if we look at the image (an imperturbable warrior that dominates the opponent from his personal power) and words (the mind is more important than the machine). And in another order of things, we're before a movie at the technical level is almost perfect. Soundtrack, photography, ideal, while it is true that the first third suffers from the dispensable minutes Assembly and pace. But above all highlight the perfect choreography of explosions, strategies, succinct of a script in which the action and look are sufficient to define the tension, and to which he attended in their last 25 minutes approximately. War films and anthology action cinema. To put the character in the circumstance of absolute solitude, betrayed by the Americans, mistreated by the Russians, losing her only friend, return to find the loser and the lone hero who rebels against the world: the bow and arrow, instinct and intelligence, Mentalism and technology: hatching of the total Warrior and final expression of the icon. Supervivencia.para survive the war must be converted into war. This frasecita - sometimes causing hilarity - it wasn't a whim of the writer. The last 25 minutes of the film are perfect exposure in the potential speech act. Once again, it is the romanticism of the individual in the minority that manages to win over the majority, but it is not a representative of the institution (or the country), but a defender of the values, the oppressed, the forgotten.Crude and one-dimensional characters. Manichaeism?. No, let's see, here there is no American Russian and good Thai and bad bad. Here are all bad less Rambo and the victims of the system. Being a film action and built above the foundation of a lone hero, supposed Manichaeism is reduced to a minimum. Almost unavoidable, in addition. And if you why this film is Manichean, we take the "masterpieces" of John Ford or Howard Hawks (which often narrated stories about lonely and forgotten heroes in a bad environment very bad) and say it loud and clear. No doubt the boorishness of the characters is a hangover - like description and development of friendship between Rambo and his collaborator is pretty flimsy-, but recognize that since his scheme and essential intention was no place for too many acrobatics. Not ask del olmo pears. It is not a great film, the scheme is a repetition of his predecessor (here is punished much that the sequels repeated theme and scheme, by that of creativity.), and beyond the remarkable expression of timeless icon is a very simple war story. Anyway, this is action cinema, Paul Greengrass and Michael Bay could learn something. George Pan Cosmatos camera is the model of precision synthesis at the level that shows action, explosions, the faces of the characters (the emotion that arises in the battle), the appropriate tempo and the transition from sequence to sequence. And Yes, everything you knew about Rambo was definitely lie. How will Rambo live?. Every day. This is the free spirit of the beatnick. And in General, a good film that preserves the values and the uniqueness of the character, strong in technical resources, but somewhat irregular and rough.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/373

Oscar Cantero

Piratas del Caribe 2

muchocine

Good film, with moderate doses of humor; is entertaining and spectacular, which minimizes the effect of certain plot holes

I always thought that it is perfectly possible to unite commercial and artistic. We must get rid of these topics that incite us to think that a film of action-adventure, full of vibrant scenes, cannot be cinematically laudable. Similarly, the masterpieces nor have to respond to the stereotype of long and boring film, convoluted plot and difficult to understand for most. Do not mean that this second installment of Pirates of the Caribbean is a work master, nor much less, but it is a quite acceptable production, which in no way inferior to its predecessor and that the improvement in some aspects (budget increase is noticeable).This time Jack Sparrow is facing a kind of demonic pirate that has contracted a debt to be paid with his soul eternal slavery, unless he can find the way out of the impasse. The only way to get rid of punishment as impious will recover "dead man's chest", and this will certainly meet again all his former colleagues. Along the way you realize that times change and that perhaps the eccentric Buccaneers like him are not more than anachronistic characters and endangered. Johnny Depp and Keira Knightley made a magnificent job, while Orlando Bloom, once again, shows a hieratismo and an inexpressiveness reach of very few. Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead man's chest is a good movie, with moderate doses of humor; It is entertaining and spectacular, which minimizes the effect of certain plot holes. Its two and a half hours of footage are not heavy at all. The ínclito Captain Sparrow sail again, to the delight of his fans. Fans including myself, I must confess, I am.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1669

Florinda Chic

Tristram Shandy

muchocine

Irreverent comedy of Winterbottom who from the outset not call deception to those who create that they will see an accurate adaptation of the book of stars.

?This is the story of a cock and a bull. This is del toro of my father, the cock now is her teach?. So begins an irreverent comedy of Winterbottom who from the outset not call deception to those who believe that they will see an accurate adaptation of the book of Sterne.Porque to Tristram Shandy (A cock and bull story to)?Life and opinions of Tristram Shandy? It was inadaptable with its nine volumes and its long inner dialogues seen it coming. So Winterbottom makes his libérrima version where the confessions and intimate thoughts of the character which give the film its name are unimportant, giving way to an excellent comedy film within the film.And the result is excellent. The film immerses us in the ups and downs of the filming of the adaptation where, in all, the dwarves begin to grow shortly after start. The rivalry between the leading actor - Steve Coogan - and the secondary candidate - Rob Brydon-provide the best moments of the movie with a few talks - between surrealism and Dada - which are really great, discussing from the height of their boots until the color of their teeth.Winterbottom - how non - it is slightly in excess of some situations - too eccentric - and performed tributes, winks, cinematic autosatisfacciones - or what you want call - every movie wig and crinoline who has been viewing and it liked, leaving a very comic/pedantic set. But note that making this film so it has been better than the make-up artist of 9 songs and that he knows of what he speaks, making an excellent exercise of criticism to me is seems autobiographical.But if something found me striking is that the director of 24 hour party people committing a sacrilege to me unforgivable. Jump to the Bullfighter an unwavering standard of cinema, include in the soundtrack emblematic items of other films! In particular: eight and a half (8 1/2) - Fellini-Barry Lyndon - Kubrick - and the draughtsman's contract - Peter Greenaway-. This touched me but it would listen to the book of Stern fans, that if any of Proust of these also must be plenty. That said, Winterbottom is a licentious.PS: Curious comment that the interview that supposedly makes Steve Coogan in the film is a real journalist of the New York Times who came to the filming for interviewing Winterbottom on 9 songs.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3876

Ivan Villamel

Mr Brooks

muchocine

An absolutely mediocre film, with a television bill impersonal and lacking nerve narrative, with a script that is lost in parallel stories that never end of of flow with fluidity, a flat realization and a horrible Assembly.

In the times, in which the thriller has now joined the list of genres seen through a vacuous aestheticism (except Honorable exceptions, that there always are), the intention of Bruce Evans, director of this "Mr.Brooks" failed, is clear from the close-up of the film, a way of making films, to create a film look looking back in time to recover. But all good intentions definitely drag a difficult burden of drop, due to the film before us resorted to worst tics of a thriller than a server type remember you those samples of suspense from the beginning of 1990s, as given to the television bill. Influences of which I will talk about below.First of all, the plot of the film, we placed on the skin of Earl Brooks, a successful businessman, owner of a terrible secret, has an addiction to the assassination, disease he believes had left behind until that one day, after two years without killing, returns to his mind, and does so in the form of demonstration material, physical in their eyes, his alter-ego, the party criminal if same, name Marshall, which in those small demons of the wrong so common that appear on the shoulder of the more crazy cartoons, although in this case materialized as a dark character, incitement le to commit more murders. When an unusual forgetfulness in it, forget one small detail in a scene of the crime, a photographer he blackmailing to to witness one of his murders in situ (which by the way, Brooks had promised if same not to perform again), so pena denounce him and end up behind bars. Starts a game dangerous for both characters, adding to the argument the persecution by an agent of the law (and rich for more INRIA), name Tracy Atwood, which Brooks begins to feel a certain admiration. To make it even more convoluted argument, the daughter of Brooks returns home with a dark and terrible secret.As discussed above, any element of the film is its fair point of balance and it does precisely the work of Bruce Evans trás cameras. Filmmaker more seasoned in the field of the script to the direction (not in vain his first and last film to date goes back to the year 1992, and it was the irrelevant "Kuffs poli by chance"), Evans knows not how to adapt to requiring the film and pinning hopes. In the field of the script, also had been extremely irregular, being responsible for pseudo-documentary the interesting "Starman" (directed by John Carpenter) and especially his great work to date, "Account with me", one of the best (if not the best) films on friendship in adolescence performed to date. On the contrary, be responsible for memeces as the story of "Cutthroat island" (if you have some slight interest, is not precisely by the horrendous script) or "of jungle jungle", subtract any shred of credibility in this filmmaker returned to the fold of the address.To a server, the film you greatly reminded those thrillers of early 1990s, popular among the general public, despite having a television bill that missed any claim to make a film lasting overland. Even so, the influence on the tone, the private tension and condescending look with the amoral characters (in a tremendously superficial way why) of that time thrillers as "Bad influences", "The hand that rocks the cradle" or "Rio Salvaje", all of them of Curtis Hanson (filmmaker who Luckily, then evolved giving rise to one very interesting director)(, albeit with a tendency to decline in his career again), or the now-forgotten films Joseph Ruben, like "Sleeping with the enemy" or "The good son", me are obvious in a supposedly aseptic and supposedly minimalist tone in the Mise en scène.It is a pity that the final product is not at all a film satisfactory, more than anything because the starting point, the interesting manifestation of the dark side of the mind of Brooks, could have been shot with more subtlety and effectiveness, instead, becomes one character of the film, and that plays against the credibility of the story. Another interesting aspect a priori was the game that gave the criminal mind of the seemingly perfect man, as a reflection on the dark side that everyone tends to, or should, hide, as opposed to its pristine presentation in society, and even family. All these transcendent aspirations of the film do not work none of them, due to an abrupt narrative pace, with parallel stories that far from enriching the film, only make to create a narrative confusion, which works more catch-up and looking for the alleged charisma on screen of Kevin Costner and Demi Moore (really mediocre in its work both), a narrative that catches the viewer with narrative pulse, thing which the film lacks completely.Bruce Evans lacks at all of a sunset in convincing scene, not even a narrative pulse or visually enthusiast, everything is cold and distant, with a convoluted and absurd script that takes the characters to the less questionable decisions, a wildly mediocre film in its final outcome. Contributes to this not too much elements which collide quite on the plot of the film, only then we can understand that condescending look, even in the final resolution of the story, a killer as Mr.Brooks, while giving rein to the reactionary concept of the family which has in places like which produces this film still unacceptable (and is not the first time that we can suffer in American productions)(, not to forget the only truly negative aspect who presided over "Embarrassing mess") the mere fact of asking a young girl abortion, in a display of fanaticism and handling than any mind open and thinking. Kill what you want if you have good heart, but you never ask you not to have a child still a young girl or teenager, really irritating.The work of actors does not help much to improve the film, rather than nothing since both Costner and Demi Moore are limited to put faces of indifference (the little credible cited pressure of Demi Moore in the parking lot, incredibly mediocre Mr.Smith character), resulting in slightly better, although not much, William Hurt as manifestation of the personality criminal Brooks or Dane Cook as discoverer of the "art" of the assassination new fan.In short, a film absolutely mediocre, with a television bill impersonal and lacking nerve narrative (despite being a genus given to this as it is the thriller), with a script that is lost in parallel stories which have never just flow with fluidity, a flat realization and a horrible Assembly (without going any further, the terrible Assembly of side events at the scene of the crime Recalling Brooks steps by the incarnate agent by) Demi Moore, is confusing and terribly mediocre), giving rise also to more characteristic of a misunderstood modernism scenes (scene of persecution by the stairs, without sound and electronic music, should be nominated for worst scene of action of the year), that of a sober and powerful film. A bland piece that although to be entertaining at times, gives rise to obvious defects in all the elements that make it up. Totally dispensable and irrelevant.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2330

Iñaki Bilbao

Crónicas

muchocine

Not reached all its objectives, but improves the first work of its author and thought-provoking. Interesting, but irregular tape of social denunciation with the excuse of a / a psicho-killer.

Irregular second film of its director, who to denounce the power of the press, journalists, and more specifically of the TV, always manipulative, is based on a real event that happened years earlier.And do it with a tremendous, very hard, start the attempt of the lynching. Then subdues everything and start the tricks of the two protagonists, tricks always based on lies and manipulation. All this will reach to fellow reporter, honest people who want to know the truth. But the other, even if you want the same, also wished success, reach the final. And peligrará the truth, he peligrará with his action the tranquility and peace of the good people of the place and others distant.It is well reflected in the film, although perhaps moments in that, without that decay interest, yes low intensity. And it is that with a very powerful start, it is normal that you download then. Something dangerous and that not always goes well.Esforzadas interpretations, with a John Leguizamo speaking quite well the Spanish, a Spanish who had to learn it fairly quickly because from the age of three lives in Los United States and their natural language is English.Damián Alcázar lives her role with the solvency that characterizes him and our Leonor Watling is as natural as it is usual.An interesting film that does not reach all their goals, but improves the first work of its author and thought-provoking.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1323

Noa

María Antonieta

muchocine

"Marie Antoinette" is a delight for the senses, a merit for this undervalued work.

If a trilogy on human pain, "Marie Antoinette" was closed with "Babel", gets the snap (not is if final) of the intimate trio of Sofia Coppola. Women looking for its identity, its role in the world.The Coppolina leads to sweeping passions and fierce hatred. But let us not forget that it marked a milestone in modern cinema, makes what pleases (Yes, thanks in part to his surname) and moves in their sauce telling the stories want you.His film is essentially contemplative, a film of images and sensations, which almost always to the pretentiousness by his pose gafapasta and trend it is cool, kitsch, psychedelic and other chachiguays words, but below this apparent superficiality of plastic beauties and semilíricas visions is a space for human feeling, that causes us a strange attraction to their characters and stories that they have.With "Marie Antoinette" the Hijísima to discover us the other side of the historical figure of the Queen Consort of France, leaving outside Palace historical events that were taking place on the eve of the revolution. It aims to that we live in Versailles with a timeless adolescent educated between cottons.The film starts in Austria when Marie Antoinette is moved to France with just 14 years to enter into marriage with the WIMP of Louis XVI. Already in Versailles, must adapt to mode of Palace life, where pomposity, the luxury and the waste of whims is provide on a regular basis. In the meantime see how he is unable to provide an heir to the Crown because of her husband (marriage takes several years to accomplish). Meanwhile the young will enjoy all the luxuries afforded in the company of a small Court of bad reputation makes the times of colleagues in raids in celebrations of champagne and strawberries, appetizing cakes, cut letters, majestic dresses and expensive shoes, hence his nickname as "Madame deficit". The packaging of this brave and controversial film is overwhelming, the art direction, sets, costumes, make-up, hairdressing. everything is sublime.Is my opinion about the movie will cause several fainting and many hurtful laughter but to my Mari Sofi convinces me, I like the stories you want to convey, that, Yes, the film is quite snobbish or I I swear by shoelaces in broken my Converse All Star white and empty of historical interior fittings to call biopic, but not empty of content that precious narrative moments abound, and therefore good film (see the ellipsis of the tables, the balcony scene or sequence of the end). I liked "Marie Antoinette", although not to throw rockets of pleasure, free corsets, historical figure he portrays brave to innovate in the Mise en scène, I like because Sofia Carmina Coppola continues sensations, not as timeless and successful as his major work "Lost in Translation", but get that his "Marie Antoinette" is a delight for the senses, a merit for this undervalued work. long live the cock!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4219

Jose Contreras

4 meses, 3 semanas y 2 días

muchocine

The history of abortion fires at the heart of the regime, and the atmosphere does not leave puppet head.

In the 1990s the rate of crime in the United States declined markedly. Many mayors wanted to attribute success to their police measures. But an economist, David Levitt, proposed an expliacion less jactanciosa and more controversial. Levitt said that the crime rate dropped 20 years after the decriminalization of abortion. There are fewer unwanted children, society had less prone citizens into marginality, and the curve is noticed when these individuals were adults, i.e., twenty years later. The assertion makes in his book "Freakonomics" that I recommend to everyone.Consider if a similar case can look for in Europe. Ceausescu forbade abortion (and contraceptives) from 1966 until 1989 when he lost the playoff. And the country has a significant crime rate. If Levitt is right, the curve noted Americans should note in Romania from the theoretical 2009.Menos Levitt, Mungiu extends for a college girl of 22 years needing an abortion in the last years of the Communist Romania. The film takes to boot. Mungiu wants us to know how many penalidades supposed in their country to get a brand of tobacco or a hotel room, before displaying the sacrifice was an abortion.The costumbrist fresco works like clockwork, joining the main story accusations. The history of abortion fires at the heart of the regime, and the atmosphere does not leave puppet head. If I wanted to give the coup de grace, Mungiu should have delved into what it leads to these two desperate housewives to put in the hands of a doctor without scruples. That tragedy was waiting to the pregnant woman with a child in a society like that.The friend of the pregnant woman, Otilia, supports the weight of the drama throughout the session. It handles the details, it gives the face, he sacrificed as needed. One wonders that it takes her to do something like this, one deconfía even of so much goodness until that birthday takes her to the House of the parents of her boyfriend. Then glimpse what inside. You want to know if someone will do the same for her.The flat sequence have become an occasion to dazzle the Viewer. The last flat sequence overwhelming that I saw, the "Atonement", shows an army of men who seek, sing and cry on a French beach. Mungiu used, at first to show the nest of a Communist student residence, and at the end to join the ups and downs of the protagonist in a suffocating approach. These two flat epics, the discussion with the doctor, and the stationary camera at the meeting in the parents House are the stylistic flourish to an undeniable work. A topic so excruciating he deserved a narrative talent as unusual as which has shown Mungiu.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2309

Francisco Bellón

Un engaño de lujo

muchocine

The first minutes of A deception of luxury do not predict the worst disaster, but halfway the film turns and back into an acceptable product of entertainment.

There are few film genres as old as the romantic comedy, which theoretically simple to produce, films are cheap, and they generally work well at the box office. Another thing is that the writers repeated the same pattern until the satiety and do not offer a small novelty. The blame is not yours, who by the less some try, but in the romantic comedy is all done.Jean (Gad Elmaleh) works as a waiter in a large hotel in the French Riviera. One night he meets Irène (Audrey Tautou), a beautiful fortune seekers fell in love with. Get to conquer her to pretend to be a rich heir, but when Irène discovers his true identity he rejects. Jean does not give up, and to regain her decides to invest all his savings to try to keep it. The first minutes of A deception of luxury do not predict the worst disaster, but halfway the film turns and back into an acceptable product of entertainment. The script is not the height of the originality, although if he had started from the premise of the two caza-fortunas, the tape would have earned significantly. The comic moments we must seek them with magnifying glass, although there are a couple of really funny scenes that are the exception that proves the rule. The film shows a blatant lack of pace, essential in any comedy, although fortunately Pierre Salvadori not shows signs of sadism to the not recreate the romantic moments. As for the actors, Gad Elmaleh completely overshadows an Audrey Tautou who performs a bland, bland, unconvincing performance. In fact, it is easier to imagine to Joan Laporta uploaded in the Cibeles celebrating the title of League for Real Madrid than to Audrey Tautou as a sly and seductive fortune seekers.A luxury deception fortunately isn't the typical romantic comedy, although it has most of the shortcomings inherent in the genre, which could however have been a fun and enjoyable film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3591

José A. Peig

La brújula dorada

muchocine

It is not simple enough that children can understand it, nor nor uses the dramatic and symbolic items with sufficient intensity and capacity of fascination and to capture the attention of adult audiences.

From the first seconds - that mimic the beginning of the Fellowship of the ring, part of the successful trilogy by Peter Jackson - check that, unfortunately, once again we have a brand product, prefabricated to try to repeat the commercial effect based on a few formulas, which recipe for a sure success. New Line bet again by a épico-fantástica history of literary origin, this time tinged with a philosophical, already not so digestible cut for audiences of any age and condition, contrary to the story of Frodo and the ring. Without dare to make forecasts, of course - see the result as a whole - would not be strange to see how the bet sinks and becomes a commercial for a product that dramatic failure for months was announced as the beginning of a trilogy designed to leave a significant mark on the movie fan and popular culture. The content of the story is interesting and has the ingredients all fantastic epic must have, but the narrative fails altogether. Lyra Belaqua embodies the journey of the hero, essential in the cinema of fantastic adventures, as it forces the canon established from the best exponents with an effective outcome: the contraataca(Irvin_Kershner,_1980) Empire or even the aforementioned community of the ring (Peter Jackson, 2001), or within the labyrinth (Jim Henson, 1986). The key is to make the spectator to be involved in the journey of the protagonists, with all the playful, dramatic or symbolic elements that tend to enrich this kind of stories, at the same time, have made the film the best means to express universal reasons through the playful spirit of adventure (literature is an art which has also given excellent results in this area)(, but by reason of saving time, the film is much more accessible to the vast majority of the public). The canon does not establish an inviolable rule, but a sign of the singularity in a specific narrative intention, a compass that leads us to recognize - arguably - what is well done and it is not well done, something that in the end the passage of time shows us, surpassing the test of subjectivity. The Golden Compass has an excellent production design, good use of photography and the contrasts between spaces of a Victorian architecture and the geographies of a desert of ice. The story aims to become allegory on the control of information (the truth), and this is the best weapon of the powers that be. Raises an opposition between freedom and authority inconsistent and very questionable (do have to accept, because Yes, that only can be free to destroy the authority?), inspired by the Catholic institution to represent the sinister guardians of the secret (do?). The interrelationship between parallel universes defines part of the enigma and the situation that the adventurers must amend in next installments. A world of fascinating and visually represented effectively theme, but to which Chris Weitz can't give soul. The dramatic articulation does not exist, but a set of spare parts (lousy use of mounting and irregular rhythm) which, although well sorted for the narration can continue smoothly, appear too half-hearted and fleeting, there is a common thread to concentrate the attention to that small heroin - and its antagonistic - grasp of the hand to the viewer and can it engage in the adventure. And one problem still serious: the own lack of definition of the product. It is not simple enough that children can understand it, nor nor uses the dramatic and symbolic items with sufficient intensity and capacity of fascination and to capture the attention of adult audiences. Ultimately, only results in a bland pastiche, an excellent idea desaprovechada, which only saves some turbid stream, interesting chemistry in the relationship between Lyra and the polar bear and minimal hope that can trace the flight in the two films that are missing.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4067

Rafa Ferrer

La guerra de los mundos

muchocine

One of these films to enjoy on the big screen.

For a long time that a film not let me completely perplexed in the cinema, such as dishes and wide open mouth, eyes and repeating over and over again a thousand exclamations.Spielberg manages to get the bad feeling in the body, spend the entire film bereaved by what appears on the screen and put us in the role of Ray and his daughter (priceless performance of Dakota Fanning), perhaps I see two weak points in the film, one the speed with which it ends, it is true that the entire film is a pure climax and that little is ultimately to contribute, but the resolution is too simplistic, not liked the appearance of the son "as he does not want the thing".Finally, another of those movies to be enjoy on the big screen.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2719

Oscar Cantero

El ultimátum de Bourne

muchocine

Worthy end to a trilogy that reinvents a genre as exciting as incomprehensibly relegated in the charts.

There are times that one is facing the sequel to a film with the illusion that it is, the less of a quality similar to the first. In the event that we are discussing today, I must admit that although the Bourne Identity not excited me, I was quite entertaining, back in 2002. Why two years later I hurried to watch its sequel, hoping to learn a little more of the enigmatic existence of Bourne, that boy who gives life always correct and already close to quarantine Matt Damon. However, I left quite disappointed and thinking that the topic of second parts were never good is one of those who they least hierra. On the other hand, the third installment has seemed rather more complete than the second.Perhaps due to the fact that management team headed by Paul Greengrass, which gives obvious have learned from their mistakes and offers to the public a product close and dynamic, leaving aside the artistic claims to focus on entertainment, that at the end and all is what most expect when you go to see a movie of this Court has held on this occasion.In any case, the fact of having succeeded in closing a trilogy that well could have stayed at one or two parties sufficiently well with some dignity cannot be to the credit of the study. This, in addition to the aforementioned Damon, contributes the rest of a balanced cast, featuring Albert Finney. Instead, the film should are the excessive lengthening of the plot, the fact that it is extremely predictable and claim impact forms rather than the bottom.In any case, it's an acceptable film to deal with the beginning of the end of the summer of 2007.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/935

José Córdoba

El perfume

muchocine

A stimulating, very attractive, film with an excellent invoice and a great story which perhaps lacks depth.

Comment on a film as the Perfume, the new work by the German filmmaker Tom Tykwer, is a difficult task. Since its publication in the mid-1980s, the work written by the also German Patrick Süskind has become one of the most sold and books dear history, with a huge Legion of fans, in addition to having livestock inadaptable fame. I would like to have me read the book before seeing the movie because I believe that it is necessary, not to analyze the film strictly but because subsequent reading of the novel is inevitably marked by the memory of the film adaptation. On the other hand, the prior reading of a novel often damage the viewing of his celluloid version, because our desires are usually seen disappointed. During the history of the cinema, we have witnessed countless adaptations, which usually meet much more entity has the most failed novel tends to be the film version and vice versa. Thus, films such as the godfather or shark outweigh to novels that suit, both in quality and in the memory of the people, while others such as La history forever are failed and insufficient in comparison with its literary original. A separate case would be the code da Vinci, then a novel which was supposed by many (not by me) little more than a script ready to be adapted in soon, became a film tedious and unpleasant, although that itself extremely faithful to the book, as screenwriter only bothered to adapt the novel to the film field.Thus, with so many previous negatives, Tykwer film had the losing and fortunately did not happen, because although I can not compare it with the novel, the German film is very estimable and satisfactory, with an excellent Bill and not dependent on the original text.The Perfume narrates the life of Jean Baptiste Grenouille, a young orphan in the 16th century holder of a sense of special smell France. We are witnessing its birth and growth, while you go for an owner to another and discovers and develops its amazing capacity for odors, until finally discover a perfume which becomes obsessed.They say those who have read the novel, which the author get you stay that describes in the book, using only the words and the power of the imagination. Tykwer also get something similar to basis of enhancing other two senses: sight and hearing. Thus, the director is set much details, making very close levels, maximizing what we see on screen, as wanting us to show its essence. While music, composed among others by the director himself is ethereal and obsessive, very inspired and with inspiradísimos moments. Tykwer approach in general is very classic, flat long and leisurely mounting, without resorting to the saturation. It also splatters the narrative with some oniric Visual moments, making more fluid the narration in a film that lasts about two hours and a half. The address only falters in the film's most controversial scene: the orgy orchestrated by la Fura dels Baus. This sequence is surprising and unexpected, but failed in its resolution.The script on the other hand, while it is not outstanding, does have the virtue of being 100% film, without paying excessive tolls on the translation of the novel. The positive level highlights the presentation of characters, drawn well are and in the negative, perhaps, the shallow waters. We never come to understand to Grenouille, the motor of their actions and the viewer has to put something on your side, not too, to complete certain gaps.Level performances Ben Whisaw meets more than in his difficult role of Grenouille, as well as the beautiful Rachel Hurd-Wood as his object of desire (though does not have too much scope to adequately develop the character beyond his imposing physical presence). Two stars Dustin Hoffman and Alan Rickman function also comply with its tasks, especially the first, because her character has a greater weight and the physical matter of the American actor is well suited. While Rickman can do little with the character.The technical sections are excellent, excelling the artistic direction (which gets you forget that the film is shot largely in Barcelona), such as music, magnificent, one of the best works of the year no doubt.In short the Perfume is a stimulating, very attractive movie with an excellent invoice and a great story which perhaps lacks depth.A final highlight detail is that the film is a co-production of several countries, Spain between them, running as few times usually do this kind of products, which are highly affected by tensions between the various producers.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3569

Emilio Calvo de Mora

El caso Welles

muchocine

Thriller on paedophiles, urban Avengers and poetic justice just not surprised by bored of your proposal...

The murky thriller scales between introspection to the Bergman - tormented characters that express without language the edges of his troubled soul - and the usual ration of clichés that perlan thriller standard - characters whose past matters little. The murky thriller delve into the morality of this dirty epic, in the nature of human behavior. You care more about the origin of the problem as its solution. So is the personaje-enganche of this thriller muddier than thriller that gives Richard Gere the opportunity to redeem himself of tasteless slips and the sambenito irreconcilable with oblivion which is being (be, who knows) icon the star-system, hombre-objeto around good actor that, occasionally, is. The pursuer of psychopaths who interprets has finished become a kind of calibration obsessive, in a surly and asocial official who has become his profession a crusade that is own investment, hero, champion, standard and, above all, ambiguous executive arm. Rugged of the script for the case Welles (disturbed behaviour, paedophiles, escorados of the rule in general) is his Director (Andrew Lau or Wai Keung Lau, Hong Kong of the already known and overvalued three author parts of Internal affairs, Scorsese infiltrators microbial) a methodical author, striving to have a history of sex criminals and impossible redemptions to the American. Akin to Seven in its stormy aspect in her purulent epidermis, the Wells case brings a new mechanics in the thriller of mystical inspiration (the pursuer become that which pursues), a closed, distant, aesthetic approach articulated by the tiresome (sometimes) Didactics of bleak and unbalanced federal agent that interprets a meritorious Gere, that only seems happy (so to speak) when track tracksit scrutinises the crime scenarios or confirms the unshakeable nature of evil. Welles is also a film of modest claims, despite its cast. The portrait of the private life of the dedicated staff moves the predictable - and here almost non-existent - portrait of the private life of the psychopaths on duty, are not sufficiently drawn or (even) blotted, devoid of narrative autonomy. All that makes that the footage becomes heavy. The demons inside of the conjurado to render justice clouding its mission and arrumban it to another Crusade: their own, that of a lost man, struggling Mills, vaguely spurred by the nobility, but gap to simple and dark revenge

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3842

Silvia Giner

American Gangster

muchocine

In the "supposedly" country of opportunities where you can be who you want and at a historic moment where the mafia is facing major changes, "modernization" runs this story that transforms the dreams.

The 2007 closes with one of the best games of this year. American Gangster, directed by Ridley Scott master one of my favorite directors and one of the most loyal to his actors are turned in fetishes of the interpretation by repeating experiences in his various films. And if there is an actor that Ridley is addict that is Russell Crowe. This actor that is like good wine (the older is better is), has an admirable ability to create an authentic universe within each character. Each character has their tiks, way of speaking, andar.este man is one of the greats. What about their co-stars Denzel Washington is an authentic animal before the camera and Chiwetel Ejiofor begins to solidify his career, all these players have something in common and is "what have achieved" cinematically speaking is the product of many years of effort and withstand recondition on the face. Ridley has consecrated as they deserve through of several of his films and now returns them to unite with a truly spectacular interpretive result. A 10 for all stakeholders; Side, transfigurations special, are all sobervios. The interesting thing about this story is not what tells us about the gangsters, but as you can get to reach and to truncate the American dream. In the "Supposedly" country of opportunities where you can be who you want and at a historic moment where the mafia is facing the biggest changes "Modernization" runs this story that actually transforms personal dreams and realities in nightmares. In this film as in the Filmography of the director, his magical form of the story is full of magic in every one of their frames and that is precisely what has your interest from beginning to end. Fair dose of action, impoverished photography and a horrifyingly ugly miss Puerto Rico are some of the notable things negatively of the film. It is true hell, as it can be a Miss Puerto Rico with this skin and that face, in short it is very ugly. In conclusion highly recommended movie. Churchill at War, Body of Lies, and Factor X are the films that Ridley premiering in 2008 and you can guess who are sharing?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4186

Andrés Pons

John Rambo

muchocine

The film gives what is expected of the no frills art from the beginning into a spiral of savage violence that fans will appreciate.

STALLONE seemed doomed to oblivion after failures of caliber of the protector, killers, GET CARTER, specialist etc.No doubt the veteran performer and director kept an ACE in the manga who apparently knows playing with success. Recoveries of two mythical characters in the decades of the 1970s and 1980s where Kingdom with RAMBO and ROCKY. Last year gave the stroke with the new delivery of the Boxer why returns to try to repeat experience with RAMBO where again is in charge of everything, direction, script, production and of course the interpretation.Accompanies it JAMES BROLIN signed for the hit series hotel, of course you are not going to ask this film a developed script, great performances, nor much less well defined characters. This is RAMBO and all that spare, come back with a very characteristic of the 1980s dirty action with blood to baskets something which undoubtedly serves to make fans delight Al Gore.The film gives what is expected of the no frills art from the beginning into a spiral of savage violence that fans will appreciate.Again I repeat that this is RAMBO anyone who wants to see film of high rank to be a cycle of WOODY ALLEN.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1708

Cp

300

muchocine

After so much criticism and disqualify her, at the end was what I expected, spectacular, visually stunning, fun, entertaining, and even epic at times.

Because I liked it. After so much criticism and disqualify her, at the end was what I expected, a film of heroic fantasy, that takes names, legends and history situations, to mount a fable. It is spectacular, visually stunning, trying to give an epic and heroic touch to the story. It is not a realistic film, it's not like it would be a Greek peasant with fire a few years later, exaggerating or just telling what the believed to be real. We can say that defending democracy and that women can say, is too contemporary, but well, Leonidas is the perfect hero, not only for the vision of the time, but for the viewer of today. It is hard, but fair, with a funny touch, and while it loses the original voice, Gerald Butler is perfect, and seems able to eat to Brad Pitt, I say Achilles, easily. The rest, because the bad guys have to be bad, bad, and my favorite, Dominic West, (McNulty!). The Persians, well, are masses of cannon fodder, with some enemy of final phase, but always shot in a very spectacular way. The truth is that the film seems to last only one hour, and worth watching her, provided that you know what you are going to see. It is a magnificent spectacle, and whoever else, has the television series Rome. To my I like both, and not there may be nothing more different, but both stay glued to the seat.Do but of course, have to leave dozens of wonderful critics, that speak of a movie where low the mask of the immortals Persians is there in reality? Orcs, as if it was really a disguised attempt of unseen forces and conspiracy to convince the poor innocent minds in the world, that we must fight against the Persians, or Iranian, which obviously is what thought Miller to write the story. I have read on different sites, 300 is francino (where?), who despises the Athenians (no, if the Spartans would speak well of them), that the Spartans are soldiers yankees (in reality, the yankees would be the Persians, well-equipped, with money and numerical superiority, but good) as overly handles are the Spartans (and nobody protests that are handsome!) is a film only to entertain and amuse (that is a category of cinema)(, at least for me, as respectable as the rest, to have fun to the public can be as difficult as convey a message, or more) or that the Persians were indeed wonderful Pathfinder, respectful and kind (already in antiquity the conquests were not bloody, mania of seeing things from our point of view) to emphasize how bad that really were the Spartans (no worse than many others)(, and even better than quite a few).In short, is a film of action and fantasy, of good and bad, funny, entertaining, and even epic at times, enjoy.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/433

Yojimbo

United 93

muchocine

This film is a lesson of many things: how to make a brave but respectful, film how to be based on actual facts without overshadow the film with ideologies, of how adapt film rules and further exciting.

Adapting facts to the cinema is conflicting. Much more when they are recent and have changed the story. 9/11 Is a date that we all in our memory. In the information society, we see how we were attacked in the most unexpected way. And how the agony and anger at the time made us react. However making a starring film which already are not present is something that requires, as well explains Paul Greengrass in a small making of, sensitivity, approval of families and based on the facts that are known. With this delicate work of the director, and knowing that I had to make a movie, the result does justice to both tasks: faithfully portray the time and get a great movie.Why this film which portrays what happened in flight United 93, the fourth plane of 9/11 that crashed without achieving its objective, is a large container of so many lessons to be learned. The documentary treatment of this film gives us a role of spectators with "special pass". Their reality ficcionada, starring many of those (which not actors) of that day we gets fully into uncertainty, doubt and fear that the worst can happen. The only problem is that viewers know that it will happen the worst.The structure of the film is a function of the chronology of events. Abandon altogether the standards in which the presentation, situation being and Division of history into acts have a certain number of pages of script. That is why many people feel baffled or bored during the first hour and ten minutes. It seems that nothing happens. However the hidden tension in the tranquility is something that becomes clear in the talks of drivers and military personnel. And then gives way to a brutal half-hour, taquicárdica and emotional that it destroys our false hopes of "happy end". Climax and end at the same time.This film is a lesson of many things: how to make a brave but respectful, film how to be based on actual facts without overshadow the film with ideologies, of how adapt film rules and follow exciting and, above all, how to fight until the end for our lives and our freedom should be a natural attitude in us. Quiet, this phrase is not accompanied by the American flag. It is the greatness of the film. Simply. Greengrass has succeeded with this film change the film similar to the attacks in which relies changed our history.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/669

Caruco

La dalia negra

muchocine

A film cold and empty, whose soul emerges from time to time and where the form prevails over a dispersed and dreary content. No doubt?The Black Dahlia?, version De Palma, desconcertará both to his detractors (many) as (few) advocates.

The obsession of Brian De Palma by the stairs, and the scenes starring Mia Kirshner, whether same a short film inserted in another major. This, most any movie fan reference, and a pair of beautifully planned sequences is the only thing that interested me in the new film from the director of "The untouchables".An operation nostálgico-cinéfila to revive the spirit of classic film noir of the 1940s, as fans, know adapts the famous James Ellroy novel inspired by the rugged case for the murder of a young aspiring actress, Betty Short (Mia Kirshner), nicknamed "the Black Dahlia" by a journalist.The convoluted plot, and all this is one of the characteristics of film noir, links with other sub-plots, full of sex and crimes, to give us practically of the development dedectivesco of the argument and force us to focus our gaze on the description of more squalid and the ambiguity of his characters. A material, at first glance, perfect for De Palma, who seems to take seriously this to "we", because it manages to let within minutes of projection of interest us for what happens on screen.Do do contributes mightily to this its? miscasting? ("allocation errors") in which De Palma, part of its turgid camera movements, is also a (involuntary) specialist. Remember this adaptation of "The bonfire of the vanities" with Tom Hanks, Bruce Willis and Melanie Griffith, where no actor seemed the proper character.? The same applies here.Instead, the styling of De Palma manifests itself in splendor in the celebrated level sequence which links the discovery of the corpse of "the Black Dahlia" with a shootout. And also in a tense sequence with the two male protagonists in stairs of snail (in the style of "The untouchables").Also surprised that (grotesque) flat sequence developed in house objective (as if the camera were the eyes of the own Viewer) entering the mansion of the Linscott and presenting us with their eccentric tenants. Remember that one of the few films, and the most remembered, entirely made in "subjective camera" was "The Lady of the Lake" (Lady in the lake, Robert Montgomery, 1946). do and this fixation of Palm down the stairs? These appear in abundance. Made in one of the first scenes that their trio protagonist, Kay Lake (Scarlett Johansson), Bucky (Josh Hartnett) and Lee Blanchard (Aaron Eekhart) meets for the first time at the foot of a white staircase.Here are a framework for static meeting and transition. Because then we will see that Bucky and Blanchard, former boxers of completely opposite characters, "fire" and "ice", become inseparable friends, are the police inspectors, and Kay, the wife of Blanchard, and one? femme fatale? do in version? light?, will come to form an almost idyllic triangle.The stairs, with a nod to "Vertigo" or the "The Battleship Potemkin", have turned to De Palma in a perfect space to create suspense and play fears, as the aforementioned sequence of tension with Bucky and Blanchard in the spiral staircase.But it also serves to display the barriers between the characters. As the scene where Bucky regards Kay while you stripping in her room, above on the stairs, (an "object" prohibited by the wife of his best friend).But the set is pure artifice. A film cold and empty, whose soul emerges from time to time and where the form prevails over a dispersed and dreary content. Without a doubt "The Black Dahlia", version of Palm, desconcertará both to his detractors (many) as (few) advocates.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1872

Emilio Calvo de Mora

La vida de los otros

muchocine

Thriller rather than chronic politics, although in the end the impression comes from having attended an existential drama to a melodrama of universal, Immortals, Greek, Shakespeare and classical dyes.

The downside of distrust is that it does not brake: once it has been launched, it is impossible to stop his Vertigo, his voracious inquina, her cancer slow. Something happens in this film. The Socialist dictatorship of the now defunct Democratic Republic of Germany lived 40 grey years of distrust, microphones hidden in plugs and bureaucrats converted in spies. The Stasi, a KGB improvised after the ruins of the second world war, became an implacable instrument of surveillance. The number of suicides at that time was very high: both the administrative hierarchy forbade the publication of these statistics.Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck writes without involving too much: he warns more in favour of not lose the thread of the film than thriller bear witness a political Chronicle. Its history, admirable, moving, is the story of every soldier at some point in the war: sentimentality toward each other, the fragility of its doctrinaire and awareness of the conflictual nature of his adversary. The guard understands the futility of its surveillance, but travel ranging from harassment to the redemption destroys homes and ruins the future of a country.I'm not a fan of the film: has perhaps been sold with an excess of fanfare. I understand that you arrabatese the Oscar to my amanda laberinto del fauno. Being both dramatic films with a political background, the German raises a number of readings and makes a more sober use of cinematographic material. When del Toro is Baroque and visually triumphalist, Henckel von Donnersmarck requires only an amazingly precise script, which never takes unexpected turns and a so huge problem that deals with care and elegance: the abduction of the liberty of a people, censorship as the only notary public today, fear as routine to face the unbearable Vertigo of decadence.And the art, the beauty, the word high to its most beautiful altar, hanging over the lives of all the characters. The playwright with a conscience Socialist, but disgusted of the barbarity of the regime, actress that lives, icon of rebelliousness, suspected of encouraging the sympathies of the undecided or ignorant, with media and its scenic desparpajo and (above all) the Stasi agent, the military to monitor the lives of others and that ends, which reverse syndrome of Stockholmcongraciado to the alien cause, indelibly disarmed of his hatred and manumitido of all forms of violence. That is, poetizado.The end of the film is very beautiful. Understand in detail the matters that the film is going to pose. And get one film with a huge weight in the conscience and the tranquility of that art, beauty, love or as we like to call it triumphs over ideas. They counted here, the history of the GDR, are not too different from those experienced in this our Spain of the post-war period. That also made me in my thoughts. And it was raining out of the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1945

Ramón Balcells

Sunshine

muchocine

A film innovative, eccentric, irregular, masterly in its last two minutes and really surprising.

We have a film innovative, eccentric, irregular, masterly in its last two minutes and really surprising. Sunshine, directed by the always original Danny Boyle (Trainspotting, 28 days later, etc) is, above all, a kind of experiment, formulated with safety, curious, above all, perhaps, if we talk about its theme, not us may seem the height of originality. Yes, so far nobody (that I know) had directed a film from a trip to the Sun to make it explode and, thus, produce light for a humanity that is running out, but isn't that what is, so to speak, less innovative, but its plot structure, full of clichés and innovations at the same time, igualadamente. Although it can resemble incredibly, at certain moments, this masterpiece of Ridley Scott, all and this drawback, the film in question get get with it and ultimately prove spectacular.Think bold orally communicate, more poetic that commercial, more strange and minimalist which, for example, that of Scott film, thing that does not mean it, Sunshine, better than Alien. Am not going to go into comparisons, but did make it very clear that both films have several points in common, as for example some of the relations between the crew (here are nine and not seven, or eight?) or the transformation of one of them in something extremely unpleasant (here occurs at the end and at the other by principle. great Ian Holm!). As I said, the film of Boyle is something less commercial, although perhaps I'm wrong, because many scenes are really worked with computer and when the film opts towards the end, its simple and poetic aspect is burned by the very light of the Sun and becomes, suddenly, a horror film style more gore. Perhaps this is its main fault, the pass, no reason, one gender to another. The rest is, as I said, great.Let's start with his elaborate script, carried out by Alex Garland. Leaving band detail that I have just mentioned, the beginning of the footage is appalling and when it ends is when the work is more exciting, exhausting and intense (impressive frozen Syndey image). It has a clear, precise structure, a topical hair, perhaps, although it never presents considerable pace slippages or plot flaws that highlight. Perhaps it is not a great script, those that impact by the master are, by its perfection, but nor is it for those who do not say nothing, completely lacking personality. But personality here have Danny Boyle, the director of the film, Sunshine, which manipulates and move all the threads, which, unfortunately, is wrong in some cases, but who knows how to rectify some of the scenes showing us more beautiful ever views, such as the already mentioned located in Sydney, Cillian Murphy's viewing of very, very close, the light of the Sun or when Rose Byrne and latter maintain a delicate dialogue. I will not forget, either, the scene of the death of one of the main characters, which suffers from a "slight" damage to her leg. That Yes, sometimes the film loses quality, or rather originality, since special effects appear, and in abundance, which worsens, mainly, the acting showcasing.Another aspect very important film, totally remarkable, would be their interpretations. Say that Cillian Murphy is not so well (say OK, so of Oscar) as in breakfast on Pluto, but which however gets that credible and to some extent their interpretation is moving. His role is one of those who are alienated from the outside world and seeking a way out, a hope. Also note Rose Byrne, in the most exciting interpretation of all. It is as if say, the melancholy of the group. Then there are others that make more than good work, as Cliff Curtis (which will become the worst enemy of the Group), Michelle Yeoh (along with Gong Li, the Eastern actress more listed in the United States, and not so, worst actress) or Chris Evans (perhaps this the best role of her career, good, if we can say career).And not to forget me some spectacular special effects that help and at the same time prevent make the film look with regard to artistic quality and not a splendid picture and really good frames, except these "slightly" recuperated appearing at the end of the film, when it becomes an absurd adventure of terror. The music of Alwin Kuchler is also notable. As you can see, what stands out in Sunshine is its ability to tell the story, rather than the technical sections.A good film, able to satisfy both young people and adults and that, above all, not disappoint lovers of science fiction. That Yes, those who expect a sort of adventure in a spaceship without any moral background or social criticism, better that they move away, because the film from Danny Boyle is not appropriate, then. The film from Danny Boyle, in some way, is a contrast between the original and topical, being majority first thing.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1795

Rafa Ferrer

Diario de un escándalo

muchocine

An almost theatrical film. For a long time not he enjoyed both the presence of Judi Dench on screen now, and accompanied by a no less excellent cast Cate Blanchett, Bill Nighy, without any makeup.

For a long time not he enjoyed both the presence of Judi Dench on screen, now, and the cast with a no less excellent Cate Blanchett, Bill Nighy, without any makeup (I becomes rare after seeing "carapulpeado" in the saga of "Pirates"), in this film, almost theatrical, that could well happen by one of these telefilms which broadcast on any television channel in desktop.Both actresses carry the weight of the film, accompanied in the baton of Phillip Grass with a score that marks a dramatic pattern at all times, especially liked the voice of Dench narrating the events, so as that Blanchett has a child with Down syndrome, for server, the most precious children of the planet.They say that an actress makes her good work when it manages to transfer his interpretation on the screen, Dench succeeds at all times, giving life to this disgusting Hag, bitter, deranged and desquiciante, at all times.During the projection I thought a story I read since some years ago, of a similar event to which recounts the tape what happened in the USA, I desvelaré no more, not enter in the area of the plot to be discovered, to not break the magic of the film.Curiously the poster reminds the Almodovar film "Talk to her", I leave only a moral, and it is that paper also speaks, sadly, but speaks.