Datasets:

SINAI

/

MCE-Corpus

like 0

Follow

Grupo de investigación en Sistemas Inteligentes de Acceso a la Información (SINAI) de la Universidad de Jaén 13

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4286

José A. Peig

John Rambo

muchocine

It exposes brutality without nuances or euphemistic valuations, what makes it a harrowing film both in its subject matter and the Mise en scène, especially due to the magnificent photography that collects all the infernal impulse of the Burmese jungle.

Sylvester Stallone has done his small and personal masterpiece without repair in sensitivities or prejudices about his character. You have chosen an expression close to the so-called "gore" (splatter) film to impress the audience with one of the best representations of war horror that we have seen in recent years (playing in excess with the theatrics and hubris, everything is said), which reaffirms the idea of brutality that characterizes the myth, and from there eliminates any type of apologetics soflama. A succinct script - many unwary confound simple with simple, what going you to do - focusing on the essence of the character and the violence surrounding it. Patria, rights, justice, revenge, loyalty.Virtually non-existent words in the script, and appearing in the mind of the Viewer as well as concepts (prejudice) from suggested in the images that speak of the Warrior essentially. But why the Warrior has no answer. The Warrior simply acts according to his nature - which cannot escape-, and violence is a fait accompli before which just react or die.Because of this, in principle, the Sylvester Stallone film is a cheater product because not even dares to raise a debate on the need - or not - to use violence. Situations set out leave no other alternative than the make use of violence or die, there is no possible choice and consequently the violence of Rambo is justified per are. In its apparent simplicity, we find the absence of apologetics. And this environment of violence inevitable is the ideal to put the warrior who never kills a country or on behalf of an ideology, but - as verbatim remains that in the movie--and motivated in a moral imperative that pushes it to give free rein to their savagery in defence of the oppressed. In this case, a group of missionaries (pacifists well-meaning but ignorant of the reality of the war), and in particular the female protagonist that represents the idealism of the action against oppression, and his hopeful address ends up causing the disguised empathy in John Rambo, whose introversion and taciturn character make that we continue looking deadpan, even though it has always defined by their silence. Realizing, in some action sequences filmed camera in hand have nothing to envy to the moments efectistas and most impressive of Saving Private Ryan (heh, if it is work of Spielberg is hiper-realista film, if it is work of Stallone.hasta say it's a bad film), although occasionally also remembers the bad Paul Greengrass. In any case, here the documentary style results in a continuum of space and time which fulfils two functions: recreation (with a few ups and downs) of an avorágine of electrifying through violence, very powerful charged sequences of dramatic intensity in which the viewer recognizes the victim and executioner, which can be identified with the victim without that there is need to develop more developed characters (and again emphasise the virtues of a dash centered in) Essentials. (It is important that the viewer understands the situation in a relentless deployment of violence intended to culminate in ninety minutes). And on the other hand, the integration of the personaje-icono in the reality of the events. The prologue documentary that shows images of the conflict in Burma Announces and introduces the Viewer to the hell of which John Rambo is a crucial piece in its resolution. With regard to the alleged Manichaeism in the characterization of characters, we return to the above. Taking into account the type of situations that are exposed in the film (situations designed on the basis of an intention or narrative purpose) - the essential Division into victims and executioners - talk of Manichaeism is out of place. Manichaeism is the simplification of the human dimension faced with achieving some political purpose, moral or aesthetic, supporting or rejecting an end or another by the dichotomy between "good" and "bad". But John Rambo is a completely visceral story; on varmints to dismember their victims in a pure and simple action film. Live for nothing, or die for something. Continuing with the essence of the icon, the ancient mysticism of the hero, and its best expression, blows on the incandescent iron, while the Warrior reaffirms its nature than any country or individual. Before the slackness of the life of a loser, the struggle for those who still believe in something. After the final massacre, a few planes idling underscore the connection between Rambo and the female protagonist, this bleak crossing of glances which confirms the vision of the warrior to hell as a true home. The end evokes the beginning of First Blood, closing the circle. He has fulfilled his destiny, the hero goes in search of his origins. They sound like the first chords of the original score of Jerry Goldsmith, and the viewer who has understood the beauty that hides this underrated personaje(desde_estas_páginas_hemos_intentado_arrojar_algo_de_luz_en_los_últimos_días,_esperamos_que_todo_no_sea_en_vano) feel the knot in throat saw Solitaire, for the first time, walking towards a predetermined place. Film, ultimately, far more atonal than it seems. Is like saying: to survive will have to commit these savagery when estes in war zone, or if the war comes to the door of your House. It exposes brutality without nuances or euphemistic valuations, what makes it a harrowing film both in its subject matter and the Mise en scène, especially due to the magnificent photography that collects all the infernal impulse of the Burmese jungle.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1117

Francisco Bellón

El truco final (The Prestige)

muchocine

Last trick (the Prestige) is, broadly, a more than acceptable film of intrigue, despite its excessive length not bored to anyone, but it will be remembered as one minor by Christopher Nolan work.

Christopher Nolan is an atypical cinematographer for the times, in which people try to not get out of the way we have marked, and do what is expected of us. This rule applies to many filmmakers, distinguished by voluntarily in any genre in particular, which isn't necessarily a bad thing. But there are a few with each new job trying to do something different to the above, and there are those who in addition to try, succeed. Christopher Nolan belongs to this last group.But it must also be said that the ability of Hollywood producing projects with a similar at the same time theme is amazing, and what better example than two feature films on magicians as the magician and the Final trick (the Prestige). Alfred Borden (Christian Bale) and Robert Angier (Hugh Jackman) are two magicians that since young people have competed among themselves. A tragic fact definitely face them, and neither of them can rest until you find the final trick that impose. Taking the novel by Christopher Priest, Nolan performs an intense portrait of human obsession and the destruction that entails. The British filmmaker takes the story, with its particular narrative transforms it, makes it yours, and as if it were a conjurer, gives the back completely in the third Act, the prestige. The Final trick (the Prestige) has a great start, but towards the middle of the tape, it declines slightly, and fails to go back at any time. It is also true that some things seem forced, that there are several blurred characters (especially that of Scarlett Johansson) who seem to be merely decorative elements. Perhaps the worst flaw in the film is predictable that comes back in the second half, as the big final surprises are easily guessed by smart viewers. For its part, the interpretations are good, although excels Hugh Jackman, who performs his best work (with the Scoop) to date.Last trick (the Prestige) is, broadly, a more than acceptable film of intrigue, despite its excessive length not bored to anyone, but it will be remembered as one minor by Christopher Nolan work.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/459

Jose Contreras

Separados

muchocine

He could have aspired to imitate one of the comedies of Spencer Tracy and Katharine Hepburn, but lacks class.

The problem of "Separated" is who tells the story of separation. The has it, and gives the version of the American male unable to grow, which is something similar to the Spanish male, but with greater purchasing power. That is why I am not interested. Only interested me the version of the girl, Jennifer Aniston. His version on the billiard table, a boyfriend who only knows playing video games as a fifteen year old, which treads not the kitchen if it does not fall the way bath. I am interested in the version of the girl because the story is truth, one feels that what would have happened. The trouble is that you one also senses that are telling to her badly.The last time they told me so bad story was "The man of the time". There Nicolas Cage says that his wife left him because he forgot to buy tartar sauce. Vince Vaughn in a unbeatable prodigy of introspection and analysis comes to the conclusion that their relationship broke down because he bought three lemons instead of twelve. All it is known that the woman is unable to forgive such things by nature. However and though it may be difficult to understand, the character of Vaughn is proud of shrewd is. Forced to live on the same floor, she looks for other appointments, but he does not fall into the trap of jealousy and camela candidates, which should be worthy of applause. This man leads his life as one of their games, scoring points.The film could have aspired to imitate one of the comedies of Spencer Tracy and Katharine Hepburn, but lacks class. Comedy, is also lacking the exception of the first sequence in which are known and he plays everything to get an appointment. The end points a brochazo of good literature, it seems a final written by Quim Monzó. The trouble is all there is in the middle.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/576

Tito Chinchan

Shinobi

muchocine

Incomprehensible rolls of honour, impossible amorios and codes of assassins. There are dead and action, but very soft and flavored talks to kill boredom.

The honour in Japan is the host, and makes that much shock in Western culture. For example, if your shit it at work, quickly looking for thousand excuses before acknowledge the error, pataleas, insult, biting, throw you the blame to another, etc. There are able to commit suicide by mistake, by washing his image and his honor, as well as his family. In Spain the politicians could do that right? By the way, this had a prequel game arcade, of remarkable success, despite how difficult that was.The film is about Romeos and Julietas are two different villages that are not too well in Japanese. For the amusement of the Emperor, the King or Chief of not is what, they have to take their five best warriors and kill each other. So coincidentally by each side one of the members is one of the lovers (Teruel, silly it, fool him). And come to jump until make only one standing.With this argument we imagine a movie action, flying Japs and things as well. Much to my regret I tell you that no, that the movie is incomprehensible rolls of honour, impossible amorios and codes of assassins. There are dead and action, but very soft and flavored talks to kill boredom. And then there's nothing of chicha, things are going very linear and the end scares of gilipollesco that is. By the way, it reminded me to another movie of the genus, now I do not remember which was.To sum up, roll, rollae, that decline in Latin.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2880

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Los ojos del mal

muchocine

Mediocre version of already seen too many times: pointless and forgettable, with great moments (the home) and aesthetic of disturbed expensive videoclip.

The eyes of evil is not sordid. Nor it establishes strong references to the classic film of the genre and is limited to exploit with Audacity and bombastic advertising apparatus sobada history of body count, i.e. the casual group which is on the site made a mistake at the wrong time and the extraordinarily gifted psychopath to collect corpses. Don't look for the gentle reader characters of depth, compelling reasons to justify the bad milk of the murderer or a secondary story that raises the idea that the writer is sufficiently aware of the noble material moulding. Horror has given glory to the history of cinema, but these times of intellectual distress, public engolosinado with the morbid, sparsely tanning depart mental laziness and demand, what beautiful verb, quality in what you pay and what voluntarily - we assume - assists, which abounds is the fast food film, to which we have already referred once. Fast food burdened by the uncomfortable feeling that the organizers of the roost take the Viewer as a perfect asshole. Does not reach all the blood River in frames of this monstrosity salvageable at times, although inevitably destined to oblivion. The height of the matter is that Dan Madigan, writer of the almost-crappy before us, is officiating and master of ceremonies of the American WWF wrestling, and up is produced by a subsidiary company of a chain in the industry. Then we cannot ask much. The man has been left to carry and has written a blowout Libretto by topics. There is the choral group doomed to extermination, the clueless architect whose mother castradora and disturbed Christianity desconfiguró you the hard drive when it was an infant it is delicate and prometedoramente civic and human. We also find the arsenal predictable scenes gore dazzle more since that the Saw franchise opened again the veda closed by Michael Myers or the series Italian balance of video store Z.The aftertaste teenager has made with the until now little relieved resource to go to some prisoners that rehabilitated an abandoned hotel: slasher with an abundance of twisted scenes sonrojarían Hannibal Lecter in fasting and non-technical effectively whooping the Decalogue of the genre. The choice of the mammoth Kane, born in Madrid, by the way, guarantees the physical tension, but the director, Gregory Dark, formerly fajado in porn films, makes it decay into the half of the tape stretch, losing what is, in my opinion, a major boot. Nothing: a broken illusion. The rest of the footage is boring, seasoned by Agile movements of camera and correct setting - missing over a given managed budgets - and some that another gracieta that disarms the sick in the stomach and painted us a light smile on the cable-stayed face.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/773

Jeremy Fox

Gojira (Godzilla)

muchocine

Sympathetic and endearing film that has perhaps lost strength over the years but remains entertaining and very dignified.

One of my old outstanding accounts with the cinema of entertainment that I both defend was the mythical "Japan under the terror of the monster" of Ishirô Honda, better known today as "Godzilla" or "Gojira", the film that created one of the most enduring myths of Japanese and universal film.It is not necessary to tell anyone that the tape is the fight in Japan against a radioactive monster that emerges from the depths of the sea because of the nuclear tests. It is not of more is that let us consider for a moment what he had assumed this film in its time.If it is not too early to make films about the attacks of September 11, 2001 in New York we are proposing in this 2006 in which we still live. Well, "Godzilla" is a film made in 1954, only 9 years after the massacres of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which killed some 200,000 people (according to the most optimistic versions) and a few months after the nuclear accident of Castle Bravo/Daigo Fukuryū Maru. It very difficult to not think about the emotional impact that due presumably to the Japanese see again its cities destroyed and radioactive, even if in a monster film. The impact that the Atomic trauma brought the art of Japan abroad, particularly in his later film is also logical.Leaving aside those issues, I have to admit that the beginning of the tape, in the opening credits appear on an austere black background while it sounds the magnificent soundtrack of Akira Ifukube, the steps and the roar of Godzilla's Fund, get me the willies (view the trailer to check it). In fact the first half-hour film I quite like, has great rhythm and presents the story in a very effective way.The second half an hour for me is the failure of the film, since it deviates a bit from his way into minor characters is not that they pantry but should have been engaging differently in history. Thus, the pace is a little broken and interest lapses with regard to the beginning of the movie. Fortunately, it revived again under the exciting final climax. It is at the time when the anti-nuclear allegation becomes more evident and retains all its current.Ultimately a sympathetic and endearing film that has perhaps lost strength over the years but remains entertaining and very dignified.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1290

Verolindapechocha

Diamante de sangre

muchocine

I take my hat to DiCaprio who has been working very well (infiltrated) in recent times. An actorazo that shines as the diamond around which the story revolves.

Blood diamond (2006) is a peliculón unforgettable performances of Leonardo DiCaprio as Danny Archer, a bright African mercenary, Jennifer Conelly as Maddy Bowen, a fierce journalist which seeks to contribute to a better world and Djimon Hounsou, as Solomon Vandy, a simple and good family man who became embroiled in the civil war in his country.Really, I take my hat to DiCaprio who has been working very well (infiltrated) in recent times. An actorazo that shines as the diamond around which the story revolves.I admit being very ignorant about the multiple crises in the African continent, by their own free will. I live in a country so full of crisis (Peru) which distressed me know that in other parts of the world things happen as or more terrible than my homeland and worse, I can not do anything about. But it is a selfish attitude, I know. Fortunately there are films committed as blood diamond, that help make these problems that nobody wants to see more visible.The action takes place in Sierra Leone, one of the countries affected by the civil war financed just by mining. "The rings of commitment that dream brides of America financed the deaths of thousands."In America, it's bling bling. But out here it's bling bang "Solomon Vandy is the proud father of day, an intelligent child that attends the school and who has a promising future, until the rebel (RUF) fraction takes by assault its people." The mother and daughter end up in a refugee camp, Dia is forced to join the rebel armed group and Solomon is forced to work in a mine of diamonds for rebels, where a good day is a rare pink diamond (much more valuable than common diamonds). That diamond will change their fate because it will be coveted by all parties, including the smuggler Danny Archer, with whom will pair and friendship throughout the film.Another character that is introduced into the life and heart of Danny is the journalist Maddy, who seeks to make a difference with their work. It will be essential to recover the pink diamond.Solomon is looking for his family, Danny seeks diamond and Maddy looks for a good story. To achieve its objectives the three (unlikely friends) must join in a risky adventure A highly recommended film!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2579

Tito Chinchan

Los energéticos

muchocine

Amazing film of the most famous comedy trio of the 1970s and 1980s in Spain. Suffers from what you suffer all that they start pretty well but as we are approaching the same resolution, all makes water and loses completely North. Still, highly recommended, and even today.

Long time did not see a movie of the caspoteca, and is my medium Zucchini does not see nothing more than women in leather and pathetic dialogues where I see deep social and political criticism and overflowing irony. Well, maybe some women in leather also see, but in anecdotal way. Incidentally, the film background of my baby is already greater than the Spaniard environment.The film is about two families of deep Spain, the Bellotos and the Mondongos. They disputed since before the civil war the property from a well in the middle of a wasteland where only graze goats. One day, in the middle of one of their usual disputes by the above comes to them news posed to take away the land to a nuclear power plant in them. So they begin a series of protests that have such an impact that the Arabs, the Government and the Americans are interested in buy them "his fame".That pleasantly surprised to find this film in my particular caspoteca, which had not made any case so far. It has a start very critic made "the two Spains" fighting for the most insignificant (a well that no one uses or shares). Cane follows giving corrupt politicians only engaged in enriching themselves. Then put us the petrodolares and dollars them Americans, you get the worst of people. And finally tells us that being good is not it reached anywhere and the roost so move them, those who have no scruples. All this dotted with women in leather everywhere (which I remember most seeing) and impudent touching to brighten up the male pupil (the female can fall to the ground of the fright).In short, surprising movie of the most famous comedy trio of the 1970s and 1980s in Spain. Suffers from what you suffer all that they start pretty well but as we are approaching the same resolution, all makes water and loses completely North. Still, highly recommended, and even today.Pity about the end, otherwise it would be almost the best.Besitos.P.D: Anecdotally, I think that it is the first to leave silicone in breasts.Pd2: The scene of the self-destruction of the tape is "Made in Ibañez".P.D.3: And the dialogue of the room of the brothel is delusional.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/11

Ivan Sainz-Pardo

Cinderella Man

muchocine

Manichean tape and thousand times viewed

Cinderella Man is like eating a Whopper with cheese. One knows exactly what is going to eat. Who know the bread, the meat, and all the prefabricated ingredients. You know what is going to know every bite.We find ourselves with a film that respects step by step and academicism the a, b, c of Hollywood cinema. There is one moment that actually surprised or escape parameters merely standard. A bad, very bad, a good very good that will represent and will carry the alleged fighting spirit required to embody again an inexhaustible wrestler to achieve the American dream.The ingredients are not included nor mixed with the intention of innovate nor please directly to the public tanning or demanding, but to cover the expectations desired by those who ultimately sharing the Oscars. Thus repeats the formula of "Seabiscuit" (repeating and copying so its virtues and defects), but this time without horse race and the scene of the great American economic depression. Boxing as the main theme to the "Rocky" and "One Million Dollar Baby", where returns to join the director and protagonist of "A beautiful mind". It is not that I do not like the Whopper with cheese, to the you upside down, but it is that I I eat them with such gusto with both boredom and the pleasure lasts only vaguely until the fourth bite. Russel Crowe acts very well, without leaving not what we are accustomed, which is already fairly. Very remarkable scene in which, descending to hell, has to go begging to the Federation that, in better times, had been part being a renowned Boxer.Though Russel Crowe not I can remove the head a film former that I recommend and where this really incredible, "Break Stomper" (1992). Renée Zellweger, therefore, finally, his face always with that so retorcidito lip. She does more or less what we are accustomed, even though it is not of my devotion and I believe that the couple does not work at all.I liked much Paul Giamatti, who outboard his histrionic supporting role.The setting, on the other hand, this very successful, as you might expect from a million dollar production of the Universal. Although one does not end to believe quite some dramatic excesses and we are faced with situations and dialogues dulzones and wrapped on clichés of those that only Americans are allowed to make over and over again. Ron Howard, who is usually empachar in his films with dulce de leche with sugar added and cream extra, here performs a right direction and get one film more than correct about courage and overcoming, with some moments of great cinema. The boxing scenes are really exciting, even already always knowing what will be the result. You know, a little and you have fun playing only join the Monopoli.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1540

Mala Besta

Voces en la noche

muchocine

Somewhat flojilla but compensates with its duration, which is appreciated at a time in which even ads spend two hours. Recommended for listeners of?Talk to mention?

Seems to be an axiom in the world of cinema that says that all the films in which Robin Williams comes out with a beard are good, and all that comes without beard are "The Bicentennial Man". In "Voices in the night" Williams leads two-day beard.The film tells a simple story. A radio announcer homosexual, Gabriel (Robin Williams), whose programme reads his own stories, receive the daily manuscript of a boy of fourteen, Pete (Rory Culkin), which details the sexual abuse that has suffered during his childhood. His social assistant and new mother adoptive Donna (Toni Collette) is recommended as therapy, and Gabriel is so impressed by the book a telephone friendship that engage. But one day the boyfriend of the announcer begins to suspect that Donna and Pete may be the same person, so Gabriel begins the investigation. The succinct script, with very few characters and barely the hour and a half, is in general quite care. While dressing thriller, mona stays, and except for very specific moments there is never a sense of restlessness or suspense about the fate of the protagonist. That Yes, manages to always maintain the interest until you reach the end, which is a little disappointing, mainly because it's not too inconclusive, and given that the film not looks much cry by a sequel, is not well understood which is the objective of an open end.Is true that the movie is based on a real event, and I guess that it is why he pretend to be faithful to the same, but it is film, not a news. If Michael Moore do what pleases with reality, I do not know why Patrick Stettner not could have taken a license or two to give a little more than packing to the last minutes of "Voices in the night".The visual style of the film is much appreciated. A very upscale scenes and a pretty well-kept compositions, especially in treatment of light it regards. So much that as the minutes go through and the plot is picking up some slightly darker dyes, so also does the lighting, and there comes a time when it seems that all levels are illuminated by a match. Sometimes it is suggestive and others, simply do not see a cucumber.The weight of the film falls almost altogether on Robin Williams and Toni Collette. Williams meets to perfection; far from "Patch Addams", its interpretation is quite restrained and also the character is quite adequate, with that air of fragility and these kilillos has caught with a detoxification cure. Toni Collette, on the other hand, despite not being a bad actress, has a character too complex, and that also have given a somewhat ridiculous teeth, what removed you enough realism to their interpretation. Sandra Oh is also passed by the film, but nor is long or paints much either.Finally, a somewhat flojilla movie but it compensates with its duration, which is appreciated at a time in which to ads spend two hours. Recommended for listeners of "Loose talk".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/757

Jesus Lens

Ficción

muchocine

Movies like?Do fiction?, however, are to remain in the memory of viewers. A film that leaves poso.

"In the city" by Cesc Gay. I don't know that demons have stuck this litany in the head, those six words which, as cyclical as continuous, come me to mind. I know that they refer to a film, very lauded and annotated; and a Director, young and greatly valued. But nothing more. I've seen, nor I know what will be the movie or its author. If is it something.The case is that it has just been released "Fiction", the last movie of Gay, which has also attracted applause from critics. And I went to see her, to a session slut, thinking if not should have seen before that happy "in the city". Come on, that he did not know if Cesc is one of those self-referring authors who, to catch them the item, you must have followed since the beginning of his career.But not. At all. Although by the issues raised in "Fiction"? the relationship of two hardened urbanites that coincide in a kind of creativo-espiritual retirement in the Catalan Pyrenees? It may seem that we are before the bucolic reverse of a film entitled "in the city", that is, can be enjoyed and savored with true delectation, even without knowing anything about the previous work by the author.And is that we we have one of those movies small and intimate, seemingly simple, they talk about banalities such as life, art, creation, faithfulness, love, betrayal, friendship, commitment and a long etcetera as long are the various possibilities offered by relationships of humans in a society as complex and contradictory as the Spanish from the beginning of twenty-first century.And, best of all, the major success, talent and ability of Gay resides in talking about all these far-reaching issues, which in other hands would have tended towards the bombast and the engolamiento of a pristine, crystal clear, simple form and without pretensions, without rhetoric or estentóreas proclamations, without empty rhetoric, paraphernalia without free ornaments.Throughout the film, obviously, things happen. But they are things of every day. For example, the four protagonists leave the mountain, distance themselves and the two more inexperienced are lost. What could have given rise to an Odyssey of suffering, overcoming, drama and others; Gay solves with an astonishing naturalness: lost both quietly descend and the fall of night reach a signposted path that leads them towards a mountain refuge and a village. As it has started to rain, staying at the shelter where, still uncomfortable, spend the night good.Naturalness. These is the key to the story. A naturally in abundance, in characters, in his dialogues, in their relations with their reactions. Characters of flesh and blood, taken from a reality that Gay, screenwriter and director, knows how to capture and describe perfectly. And is there a fact in the history and lived by the author: the sentimental failure of friends and acquaintances who, being young parents, throw down the drain their relationships.It does not have the realistic film of great predicament, today. However, films such as "Fiction", paradoxical title, you reconcile with these morsels of reality with these natural notes that persist over time. Where the spectacular special effects today, tomorrow are child's play, esas-mega productions which now command a huge media interest will be grass of oblivion. Films such as "Fiction", however, are to stay in the memory of the spectators, to be part of the sentimental and cultural heritage of this our society, and as it is the case, for example, with moral tales of Rohmer, who both reminded me this "fiction" that, with the passing of the hours, it is gaining in strength. A film that leaves poso.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/439

Jose Contreras

Corrupción en Miami

muchocine

Film to put their characters to the neck and to involve the Viewer. And it is that Michael Mann isn't David Mammet, does intellectual pastimes that we admire it from afar.

Miami Vice begins with the end of another film that has no shot. Miami police had infiltrated the band of traffickers of Jose Yero and murderous band infiltrators and their families. The principle is devastating because Miami Vice is of as Sonny and Ricardo will do the same and we know how he can finish. The tension is whether going to do better or not.Sonny and Ricardo (Farrell and Foxx) are two detectives who have to impersonate traffickers. That scammers films the plot like is mislead the other. To achieve this they have to travel to Haiti. But Michael Mann isn't David Mammet, does intellectual pastimes that we admire it from afar. Mann makes film to put their characters to the neck and to involve the Viewer. The film throws to walk when what is at stake is the cunning.John Nash, the protagonist of "A beautiful mind", became famous with his theory of games, which is little more or less, as the game play the protagonists. Life is like a game, one always has the option to cooperate, or of betraying to the contrary. A model can be traced according to the strategy follows one in each hand. The good-natured cooperates always, but they betray him. The resentful cooperates until they betray him once and then never again. The conclusion of Nash, if I remember correctly, was the most profitable strategy of the perverse. As uncooperative it never does not lose nor a. What Mann tells Nash is that the winner is not which takes them all, which WINS is that confident.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2603

Silvia Giner

Harry Potter y la orden del Fénix

muchocine

On the basis that "could not concetrarme completely in the movie", this new delivery seems very forced, so many things are that have wanted to translate that the pace is abrupt and at times bland.

After watching Daniel Radcliffe in Equus (play by Peter Shaffer, in which protagonist) naked, and with that tail between legs it is certainly hard to believe that it is once again Harry Potter. Let us not forget that the Potter is aimed at children and as such his characters even if they have an evolution and maturation, always keep that veil Heinberg (minimum how), clear that in the case of Daniel, such an "appliance" removes completely the veil. So it is that you on the basis that "could not concetrarme completely in the movie", this new release seems very forced, so many things are that have wanted to translate that the pace is abrupt and at times bland. At least I do not have enjoyed this film both in the past and that we had a Helena Bonham Carter (God I love) and Evanna Lynch (Luna Lovegood plays) as sinister touch of this installment (don't know if you you realize that increasingly is pulled more sinister item, introducing characters Dark).For my best thing about this film is it "without a doubt", Evanna Lynch (August 16, 1991) is an Irish actress of 1, 52 m of height. She plays Luna Lovegood in the fifth part of the Harry Potter film series. In the auditions for the role, he defeated 15,000 applicants. Even before given the role, was already a big fan of Harry Potter; This is his debut on the big screen, my God and that debut, is undoubtedly a future replacement of Helena Bonham Carter and we'll see if new musa Tim Burton along with others of his style as Chirstina Ricci. Only to see it already it is worth going to the cinema.For the rest, the visual theme remains spectacular, as the excellent production which are already being a seal in the saga. The world of Potter nevertheless continues to be fascinating.David Yates, director of this delivery, will also direct the next Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince which began filming in September of this year and intends to release at the end of 2008. With the exception of the protagonists, the rest of the cast is not confirmed. If you think that this stayed here were wrong because in 2010 we can attend at the end of the saga: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, moment in which the artistic careers of young Portas will fall sharply for some time.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/467

Lara Croft

Transamerica

muchocine

Road classic movie with characters well deep, geographically speaking, and grotesque in its description.

After the expectation caused by the excessive delay in its release, Transamerica is a stick in the wheel of good intentions. Anyone who is predisposed to recommend or mention it favourably and/or sugestionado will find the somewhat difficult task. It is true that the character who plays Felicity Huffman is a challenge of creation. Hence, I assume that the successful and award-winning star of Desperate housewives has chosen it. What is more, watching the credits one appreciates its increased commitment to read that her husband (William Macy) is the producer of the story. As well as many other times confessed that you let pass errors (or horrors) in pursuit of enjoy the story without much criticism, with Transamerica it was no easy task. My "good" vision is usually given to cases of a deep interest in history more than how it is told, or by his beloved characters. In this case no winks I could find anywhere. Concluding in a road movie classic with well deep, geographically speaking characters, and grotesque in its description. When Bree (Huffman) a transsexual to days of your desired change of sex her contact from jail a son who did not know, product of an adventure in the University, the visit to the operating room he gets. Her therapist must not you operate to resolve their conflicts with the paternity. A long way to Los Angeles, various byways in the route to visit his family included and logical friction with a teenager to know the status of Bree and their identity. I must admit that if this road movie would have been filmed anywhere else except United States my feeling to see her is had approached over the wishes of the debutant director Duncan Tucker than to exasperation that I finally felt. Perhaps either by seeing it too or for reasons personal but commonplaces and worn-out stereotypes of inland from United States managed to exasperate me.As a sign of study and characterization of character, Transamerica is a recommended product to view and surprise with the bigotry that Felicity Huffman plays Bree. Already a priori one presupposes it opposite. Now if you thought seeing her because her recommended Catherine Dlugi and that is more than enough then please do not: there is a nude male frontal! Without offending the intelligence of anyone, I am obliged to make this clarification given the amount of expressions of surprise and anger I heard in the room. Much unsuspecting Viewer in the end does nothing to disrespect us the rest.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/594

Oscar Cantero

Crank

muchocine

Film entertaining, dynamic and certainly enchant the lovers of unpretentious action cinema.

Mark Neveldine and Brian Taylor are responsible for the screenplay and the direction of Crank, a film that chronicles the adventures of a Hitman who decides to retire to share the life with his girlfriend just when inject you a poison that would cause death unless he stays in constant motion. Carreras, abuses, shoving screams and jumps fill the eighty-seven minutes it occupies. As you can see, a film that part of these premises, with this simple plot, can not aspire rather than to entertain, to have a fun time doing the improbable and grotesque its unique flag. Jasón Statham (Transporter, chaos) is one of the new action films today, since that usually portraying the typical hero cool, rude, relating despot, aggressive, rude and riotous, seasoned with a dash of elegance in the form of expensive suit, prevailing in the current film. Surrounding him tour throughout the history, and the appearance of the rest of the characters is merely timely. Statham saves certain solvency with the responsibility of carrying on his shoulders the bulk of the script (guioncito), although aided by a fast-paced soundtrack and a few games of House that although at times they are excessively abrupt, they help to imbue the viewer the sensation of distress experienced by the protagonist. Crank is a dreamlike Entelechy, a fantasy to which he has tried to give a touch of realism; But despite all is bad at all. Obviously, if we stick to the formal definition of good movie, we can not fit it there, but yes is what a film entertaining, dynamic and it certainly enchant the lovers of unpretentious action cinema.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3864

Moebius

Infierno de cobardes

muchocine

Hell of cowards is an essential film to understand the evolution of Clint Eastwood both as a filmmaker as author of westerns.

Lake, a village that has made his fortune through mining, is a God-fearing people, although if someone they fear more to Stacey Bridges and his two cousins, bandits about to leave prison after serving a year of conviction. They have good reason to not fall asleep at night in Lake. Some fear the wrath of Bridges. Others, knowing of his guilt, fear the wrath of Dios.Tras directing his first feature film, Play Misty For Me, Clint Eastwood returned to encased a revolver to shoot the story of a gunman with a thirst for revenge. The influence of Leone was still very evident, and the Eastwood character barely kept differences with "The man without a name" that had been popularized in the so-called dollar trilogy. The poncho had been left behind, but the enigma and the sardonic smile remained there.However, the unknown of Eastwood already shows signs of what will be the later gunmen of the actor and director. If with Leone the gunman was a hero as dirty as their enemy and that works the stranger who comes to town for its own benefit, in hell of cowards hidden their motives, although they will be be more personal. The old unknown Leone appears especially in the first half hour of the film; There you have noting coffins and facing three guardians, or "seducing" two ladies of the town: the bitch that trafficking be Madam and women's consciousness trapped in a miserable place.As the film progresses rogue Court gunman is yielding to the dark man, the avenging angel. Are you propose or not, Eastwood was taking a step beyond the harmonica of until that his time has come. But we can not only see the past of the Californian in the film. In a sketch of what we might see later in the magnificent without forgiveness, the director confronts his gunman with the past in the middle of the flames under a night sky. Hell of cowards not just bandits and revenge. As interesting as the final duel or more if cabe is the duel that keeps the stranger with the small town. Having left defenseless to the city before Stacey and his men, the gunman known powerful. And it is then when Eastwood brings us the hand to a walk through a village which is said to be God-fearing, but that after your Windows and doors are only greed and hypocrisy. In his drawers in their wallets in their business, they hide the guilt, the burden of a dead. A sound comes to them in their dreams horizon distorted by heat appears on horseback the stranger, riding in pursuit of final retribution. A disturbing sound accompanies this ghostly vision until the rider becomes visible. It is then when the soundtrack begins to drop their notes while the gunman rides to Town Lake. Before the stunned eyes of his countrymen the stranger rides unperturbed by the main street. His apparent cold blood only breaks (as well as music) when he hears the restallido of a whip. A sound that the city holds a bitter memory.Hell of cowards is a duel with pistols and portrays a corrupt society that moves only by its economic interests, and whose prosperity is tainted blood (does refer Eastwood to any society in particular?) (That each draw their conclusions). The stranger does not forget this last, and will do that in due course.If the relationship of the gunman with the inhabitants of Lake is of pure contempt, two characters are crucial and cause some disconcerting attitudes of the man without a name. They are the two figures which could perhaps have justification to save the burning, but who at certain times the stranger will not hesitate to make it go wrong. The first is Mordecai, a dwarf that in sight well soon the importance of that alien, putting at your disposal. After your interested attitude however there is some appreciation for the quick silent shooter, that it will award naming her small friend Mayor and sheriff of Lake. When Mordecai asked who will give the order to fire before the arrival of the villains, the alien responds: "You do". A subtle joke about the gunman? The second character is Sarah, the woman in the hotel, the only person in the village who tried to help the old sheriff. But it ended up crushing the will of her husband, so the new master of the city not forgive you pass by his bed. Still, Mordecai as Sarah go well unemployed the subtle and terrible time revenge painted in red of a ghostly outsider emerged from the sands of the desert, and to which they return after having fulfilled his fatal mission. Hell of cowards is an essential film to understand the evolution of Clint Eastwood both as a filmmaker as author of westerns.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3592

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Luz de Domingo

muchocine

Cloying at times. Sober, at times. Astonishing at times. Boring, at times. Garci is Garci: a man with a path and a professional ethic technological bomb-proof. It deserves, however, worth going into their game.

José Luis Garci is an endearing character. Endearing to the way in which it is Christmas or an autumn walk to the fall of the evening. Garci is one of those men that you can confess your cinephiles without this millstone nor top you Geek of the day. You can drop you that Douglas Sirk has given you wonderful nights on television (blockbusters forty years ago that he stopped to the German master program) or indie film, this invention of the majors to demonstrate to the unwary that are modern, giving you creeps, rash and cholera limited access. Garci listens to you as a good father and is even possible that believe you the Vice of Italian neorealism (which didn't have no bloody idea) or of the nouvelle vague (that you sounded to Marlon Brando putting butter in the ass his plump girlfriend). Garci (follow the thread) can make you understand already forever the magic of the cinema above the film as an industry. And this not so never ever thought and you content with going to the movies, take the time and come out with a bobalicona smile in the face and five euros less in the portfolio. His how great cinema is illuminated the squalid landscape of film information in the idiot box, but morality and the use of good practices banned smoking as a gangster of the RKO and planted to RTVE and took his film, his love for cinema and its always witty (and sometimes invited Plast, see the ínclito Prada De) hometo liven up the Sunday afternoons around a fireplace and a soft jazz good Fund. Garci (already conclude this apologetic Introit) like always. His film falls well also. His classicism, his genuine vision of the made aesthetic can be seen and there is even a label (a recognizable authorship) that permeates dialogues, photography and soundtrack.So the filmmaker José Luis Garci is clear that he has a language (grammar, read in connection with the premiere of the grandfather years ago) and a detectable universe. Azorín, Galdós, Baroja, Clarín, Pérez de Ayala, Delibes and similar provided his prose of bells to the speculation of this man, which draws films with some regularity. Films that inevitably smell to Hollywood, red carpet and canijos, when not invisible Goyas.Garci cinema, in the words of a friend, is stale and perfect, languid and allowed, boring and perfect. The perfect is mine. The problem (mine at least) is not Garci: I am.Light of Sunday, his last tape, is a pure play, a rich recreation in detail of the tyranny of early 20th century in the deep Spain, a story of impossible love, violence rustic - in the manner of Peckinpah in straw dogs or more head-on Deliverance of Boorman, no excessive difference - exerted by gentlemen of people. It is a pure work, without folds language, but I don't know if the purity is important to art or, on the contrary, these modern times, aupados in Vertigo, enfebrecidos by love of money and the unfortunately insensitive to the talent if talent not requires visual pirotecnica, scripts with trick in the last line or assassins in series with knowledge of quantum mechanics and ease in Kant and Renaissance poetrythey do not require Garci movies. It is possible. Until the own Garci (read in some newspaper) you want to see the film as a kind of western rural, castizo, Hispanic and chewed in the light of a bagpipe. The error is in me, curious reader: in the extension of my phobias made public and not projected on the screen. Garci makes Garci as James Bond takes life with Bond girls and permission to kill and fornicate on distant islands of the financial path. Its gap is analog, as we have said, the open road is nineteenth-century which goes on to say that it is not actually breaking ground but - film to movie - you are entering in an admirable and to some extent legitimate time warp, that took him to what we have said: to Sirk, Preminger to Cukor, to all the formidable movies made to be enjoyed by future generationsadmire and consider this - pixel, digital, impeccable in the technical aspect, but orphan of soul - him fails nor to the first roll of coiling.I thought seeing the grandfather in all this and somehow tell here now. This review - except for the strictly temporary detail of the film - could be for the great film of a great Fernando Fernán-Gómez, escaped already knew him or where. The folletín has become: today, at least, has become. Characters abismados in their sorrows and sparsely salvables, worlds of a rusticity resistant movement, players in State of grace (Carlos Larrañaga, who did not remember except for loose scenes of zapping pink, is Goya, I do not know if it is much or little). Light of Sunday (precious title) does not fool any of their two potential audiences: who knows what and which has no idea who he is Garci and to what extent is able to amaze us or suffocate us-based table stretcher, time stamps and impostados dialogues. The film, a lengthy flashback, is - in the background, perhaps in the background - a breath of fresh air inside. Curious paradox: the old ilumiando what's new, the outburst classic imposing his patron to the modern feeling. Perhaps why light of Sunday deserves more of what (I'm sure) will receive. People, these two hypothetical public, are already tired of the variegated ordinary television, never better written folletín. People will not realize the scope of this proposal, its climate rupture within its stagnation, and that (in the light of these already described times) is not the order of the day. The rhythm is right, the texture of the images cloying, but suits the passage of those events that recounts. However, I imagine that the story will continue: you walk Garci already looking for another folletín of time and looking for landscapes, urban of the 19th century in the 21st and expensive locations that express what they Galdós thought. Don't have to go far: just pull filmography, plug the DVD and see his work. The story of the film is reventona of people that has not done anything other than the same movie. I open floor. Garci is the national candidate for the award.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2212

Jose Contreras

Oceans 13

muchocine

If you feel something in the pit of the stomach so happy seeing all the friends of Soderberg you don't have to worry. Arcades is called. And it happens when just the film.

The actors in the series Ocean? s have a reputation for fun with the shooting and then promoting the movie. They spoke of it in Cannes with the same irony that if end of inventing, themselves, the irony. They resemble the characters from this book "FISH" which explains, inspirandose in the sublime example of a fishmonger, which are the rules to remember to make the work climate positive and not a dumping ground for energy. Fame is, at times, a perfidious damsel that gives her favors to whom deserves them less (the lamentation is true for both the book and the film).Danny Ocean trilogy consists of stories of fortunes that change of hand, millionaires and sympathetic men who deserve to be so. In the first 11, Clooney's character and Andy García competed in the field of the ingenuity of the money and, above all, in the heart of Julia Roberts. In the second they came to Europe to play with a European thief who all meaba further, the dollar or the euro? The third runs along the well-trodden path of revenge.Soderbergh transmits his camaraderie with the cast and also with the public. His style is to treat us as equals, why not wasted our time. Practice the ellipsis as an an accomplice who doesn't want to bother us. It is worth thank you, above all, if one owns the video-club that will be indispensable for all those who want to understand what has happened.Tunnelling machines, factories of dice, computer programs that read in the pupil if a winner has cheated. An irrepressible inclination there is in Soderberg to be epatados, with the magnificence of the casinos in Las vegas, either with the sophistication of the methods of the thieves of Las Vegas casinos. One of the parts needed for the coup, the factory of dice, suffers a strike of workers. For the protagonists the most unexpected surprise is discovering the ridiculousness of the amount of the sum of all labour claims by a picket. It is comforting to know as is the repampinfla all and lives the rest of mortals. It comes very close to how much we care about the rest of mortals as they live.If you feel something in the pit of the stomach so happy seeing all the friends of Soderberg you don't have to worry. Arcades is called. And it happens when just the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1032

Ramón Balcells

Happy feet

muchocine

Great tape animation with ecological message included and some impressive musical numbers. No doubt, we have the best film of animation of the year.

After seeing Al Gore defending the environment, one remains somewhat restless to know what is happening exactly in our world. I at least felt this feeling of concern, so I was like "amazed" before this smash we cause humans with Happy Feet, though in a more lively manner (sorry for double fun so little here, but is that not were I go nothing more). George Miller, director of several films failure (for me, at least), as the oil of life or Babe, a brave pig, invites us to this wonderful animated film with a moral message that is more than clear. This time they are not little pigs they appear penguins, while also leaving other animals of the glacial area such as Antarctica. One could say that Happy Feet is a mixture of the story of the ugly duckling and the film Free Willy that precisely displays topics as interesting as the rejection to be different and ecology. The film, in short, tells the story of a penguin who was born different, without knowing sing and who later reject it for this same problem. During the journey in search of something, better find other penguins that make you know that he is better than you think and it is worth follow and stop band to anyone that does not accept it as it is. The protagonist, rather than be able to sing her has to dance, which is not well seen in the world of penguins. So after rejection and the trip again in search of his beloved Gloria and seeking their happiness. From here it is when things start to get complicated and everything is changing until you reach a limit in which the protagonists see as they are human (for them, alien). Besides, the film features several tremendously entertaining musical numbers, of which one puts you goose bumps. Dances, most of them with tap dance, have a delicious pace and are not (most of them) heavy. For my the best of them is the final, although on playback (who has seen already I mean) is also excellent. So Happy Feet could be also called "ecological musical". But on the other hand, the film the animation of the film is also incredible, by what does that even you feel more comfortable seeing it (attention to the sequence where the ice is breaking and the pieces are chasing penguins). Although the script, that is to say, it is not no wonder, since half of the film presents a more or less significant drop that stops the incredible pace that had by then. Although then recovers it in a special way, with a magnificent dance as a whole (of all the penguins). So if we destacáramos something, it would be his incredible animation and not the script itself. In short, Happy Feet is a great tape of animation with ecological message included and some impressive musical numbers. No doubt, we have the best film of animation of the year.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/92

Marta

El castillo ambulante

muchocine

History fascinating and full of fantasy

For quite some time that did not see the film a film that I like. I would like to say that I liked really. Also long enough that he hoped the premiere of "Howl's moving Castle" (or "Howl's Moving Castle, or" howl no ugoku shiro ""), the last film by Hayao Miyazaki. Friday her they premiered, on Friday I saw nothing more return from the Congress, and now I cannot make long that I do not see a movie really liked me.First of all, a few details: when speaking of this man often mentioned as "the creator of Heidi or Marco". Or mentioned you, because for some years (especially thanks to "Princess Mononoke" and "The journey of spirited away") has begun to be known to the general public (among which I include myself). As you can see on my list, "The journey of spirited away" is one of my favorite movies. In 2002, he won the Golden bear at the Berlin Film Festival - making it, I believe, in this award-winning animated film, first and in 2003 won the Oscar for the best animated film.However, having said that, I am continuing. "The journey of spirited away" is a magical film, where each scene is a surprise. In fact, and as well he told me Guizmo at the time, is a species of "Alice in the country of wonders" to the Japanese. The first time I saw I liked, that when he finished me he upset not to continue with the story. For that reason, it had high hopes for "Howl's moving Castle" and as usual when you expect much of something, a little bit of fear that decepcionara me. Luckily, it wasn't like that. In an article by Supernovapop leo that the film "has been described as one minor part of the career of Miyazaki works". The truth, I have no idea of who has been able to say something, and it is not a subjective opinion, because any case, is nominated for the Oscar.En say what they say, "Howl's moving Castle" is a fascinating and full of fantasy story. You never know what is going to happen next, and this is a pleasure. As regards the protagonists, what should I say? The demon Calcifer, turnip-headed scarecrow, the Witch of the Landes and the own Sophie, converted into old woman, are great characters.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/792

Elena Suárez

Dead or alive

muchocine

Laminated good aunts who put a few beatings of scandal. Insufferably bad and boring. Better wait to see her on television.

There are certain types of films targeting, mostly teenagers who all you can ask them is that they do you have a fun time and, of course, have no intention of conducting a history of quality. But, of course, there are limits to everything even when you not pretend to make a good movie.Based on a series of video games, DOA does not introduce any shred of personality about this genre that has more than one film and that could be summed up in one simple phrase: laminated good aunts who put a few beatings of scandal.Previously as is we had made suffer with the same genus but starring men who loved to anabolic above all things (I think that it is not necessary to indicate examples because in our safe minds that looming us more than one title). Well, it is necessary to supplement this base with some elements if you want to be you something curious: an acid humour, good action scenes, an elaborate end? Finally, some touch to enable a simplistic story to you spend time entertaining, as it was the case with the film version of the mythical series "Charlie's Angels".However, DOA does none of this, which is why, it is insufferably bad and boring. Pay to see her is a real steal. Better wait to see her on television (this type of movies abound too often in some national chains).And stating that I have not spoken of macho that can reach this type of icons (the Acme in this regard would the acrid starring Lara Croft in the film by Angelina Jolie, known also for being one of the best products marketing not only Hollywood but also people superbuena and superpija organizations also called NGO? s).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2495

Rafa Ferrer

Los 4 Fantásticos y Silver Surfer

muchocine

Painful until exhaustion, this completely made for the child audience, and went again and again through the same "modus operandi" saw us at the cinema 80's when we were small.

Now comes this mediocre sequel to another film also mediocre, although I admit that the first delivery came to amuse and entertain, this 2nd delivery there by where take it, though, for my own disappointment, we will get a 3rd party, insofar as this tape has raised what cost in just 3 days of display, part "of guilt" has it that it was rated in the USA "for all ages"so parents with their tender shoots populated cinemas to see the adventures of "The fantastic four".The tape, painful until exhaustion, this completely made for children, and we went again and again through the same "modus operandi" saw us at the cinema 80's when we were small, and it is that of so predictable, bland and poorly conducted is the tape, one cannot stop thinking that you are kidding and that Marvel executives, they have assigned the rights more thinking about the fortunón of $$ that will lead from the sale of merchandise, that by which the tape whether or not a success (which if it has been).Few things can stand out as "good" or that is worth perhaps contemplate the excellent realization CGI of "Silver wake", since the rest, much argument, as scenes of action such as soundtrack, as proceedings are extremely bad, and, although I always qualify as a grateful stomach capable of viewing anything, in this case, it is not so, and I've pulled "bufando" and cursing during much of the footage.The argument, is predictable and badly facing, pointless and bland, action scenes soundtrack falls into the same chords as the first, but who cares its dubious quality?, actions nuanced, although they rub in some moments in humor of "blow and with one blow", almost always performed to ensure that "the nanos" with what they see on screen, in short, a tape debtor other MARVEL hits such as "The Punisher", "Daredevil", "Elektra".In short, the tape I would love if I had 6 years, pity it takes almost 25 more.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1798

Antoni Messa

Inland empire

muchocine

The molluga looks patrinada. The pertufole is sintrapiño, while the glotasa of the pergalota glota. Ultimately, Inland Empire, is the barñofla in plastrullo. Fails to plastruflete, but almost.

Against all odds, Inland Empire, the last film of David Lynch has premiered on our screens. And the truth is that, pernobulando the percullato, be debillofla in parnasio. Lynch was in the idimorlasa of the termáfogo barnaflea. Noñela bows in the catrica of the jabugo. Butrofé and cremafosa are atirloplan in the muplasta; sudden muplasta of the crofeguina. Apliculla in the prefetrá.David Lynch, Inland Empire, the escrofolla cromaña. And the tropoña. His sirlesio is frunoso, but not incrote. Two paña ñeña ñuñote; Ñapa: ñapote. To do so, is Laura Dern truqueña mocretulla. And are cropicuta the cropa proca, breticulando the crupote, the pacrasia and, occasionally, the llandriga. Napra mocrosa furfella Mocre. But this dobluga the cruña of the ñopro and is merofutre the corprulla, with the help of the percutafle, the alsina and the bisofre.In addition, esprentañufla the corprilobio of the irlatrefos, amusagando towards the pespotre of the sófrago. Exceptional maprulla of ingroluentos merfallafles, where the pasaplonio of the marsuplio surplolopia to the fabrasa of William H. Macy. Pericrotasa of the bislabé of the refollo to the cralutrendo, but spinning by ñecaplote farlasia. Tomatrafo encotrilla: the virlotué. Aplegrote in grapunta of the grañota and the promilloso. Tomoso and pastroso as well as bluñeque. The reñé of the callostro in the oprisade the most purreglostro. Astrufe in the pagotra.Jeremy Irons to the greñasa crepalla of the trupastro of Lynch; the muquitra of the frenastia, colgasa and fregolla. Peñaremolla the flasa. And the flasio, the responja. Comisodé of lumiflasa, the blasa. PASIO vermeña, that the day is nuflasio. Corcoya of the moya, the moyasa and the moyasón. But, despite this, the fribelote is alcafresio. Quiet, but aquirulotre with the pechulongras. Parpalluga.la molluga looks patrinada. The pertufole is sintrapiño, while the glotasa of the pergalota glota. Papró and cafrune are unnecessary in the retrucote tromoya. Moñafla incadelasa. And the bardagí morafré. The riverola mutinga was esnifolla with her barulla. Although lacueva is matrova in the carcavona of the pollastre rustiflo and is infrula: "Moraviyá the mollariña of the babote and the lavisa!". Contenetre of the pasamotre of the Castollafra to the conillastres; the great Castollafra of casolla, the llapa castrolla and the llapete. Mirlonga abastra of the trolocuense of Lynch. The arbolla is golla and something else, but little.Ultimately, Inland Empire, is the barñofla in plastrullo. Fails to plastruflete, but almost.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1371

Matías Cobo

Campamento Jesús

muchocine

One is embarrassed by those children who applies cruel brainwashed and forced to follow, with suffering, the desquiciados principles of this new formula of Western fundamentalism.

Imagine that one day, while watching the news or documentary from the history channel, assists perplexed to the homogeneous and radical formation of the Hitler youth or in the present tense, some Muslim children trained by Taliban. Probably think it's horrible to educate in this way to the innocent mind of a child still in the throes of training, and also think to do would be impossible the implementation of similar tactics among children and adolescents in our 'advanced and democratic' societies. But if you are lucky enough to be able to view the clairvoyant and splendid documentary Jesus camp (Jesus Camp), nominated for an Oscar for his category this year above him seems more debatable.The documentary by Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady is shot in the United States.UU. and focusing on the rampant and powerful citizens community created around the Evangelical Church. Specifically, the film narrates how are recruited children for about 10 years and lower ages for the encampment of North Dakota, Kids of fire, directed by Becky Smith. Once there, one presence, with no less perplexity to the above view the initial recruitment phase, how these children are being raised in 'alleged' Christian values with the more radical religious fundamentalism practices.They urge to regain control of his country, to the cry that are soldiers of Christ, to avoid 'pollution' from non-Christian ethnicities such as Muslim or otherwise. They worship which step of Holy week a photograph of President Bush (declared follower of Evangelicals) and ask Jesus that you enlighten this to put the entire nation under Dios ("one nation under God"). These messages are presented in spectacular 'shows' similar to a concert, with light and sound effects, some children who come to enter into a trance at the moment Summit of the Act. It is crying live tear when they pray and repent of their sins, or is how their bodies convulse as if diese them St. Vitus dance when the Holy Spirit will be joining them.But the documentary goes beyond, and shows how after all this religious movement, there is a manifest interest in hoarding the political control of the country's main institutions. Indeed this, and no other, the main message that machaconamente repeated in much of acts of cerebral centrifuge, asking for vote way outright for groups of power similar to which leads Bush in the White House. Thus, these religious 'shows' refers more power and to identify the enemy (those who did not embrace the faith, i.e., different) to homogenize society on their evangelical principles. So there are many differences between movements such as this and, for example, others as Aryan supremacy.In the documentary, the counterpoint to this group put him from the influential radio show Ring of Fire, by Robert f. Kennedy Jr. and Mike Papantonio. In space warns about the brutal growth of this movement, which reaches between 80 and 100 million noteamericanos. Allegedly this group knows how the constitutional separation of State and religion and how take advantage of the tender minds of children to spread his message of division between generations.Completed the documentary, one forgives, between hallucination and dread, about the fact that someone with similar ideas is the President of the leading power in the world. But, above all, one is embarrassed by those children who applies cruel brainwashed and forced to follow, with suffering, the desquiciados principles of this new formula of Western fundamentalism.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1217

Yojimbo

Pequeña miss sunshine

muchocine

Do is part of those independent movies that already atufan, that are no longer as indies, which should better be called of? under budget?.

They said that this film was the very best of the year. And advertising in media also. And as good supposedly independent movie, has to sell the typical scheme of rare family, with stereotypical characters wrapped in a simple one situation posed to a personal challenge and a vital lesson.The movie that a girl wants to go to a talent contest and accompany him in a dilapidated van his grandfather, choreographer and druggie, his protective mother, his teenage brother who hates everyone, his uncle in gay suicide and behind the wheel, a ridiculous father obsessed with success could be summed up.This short tale to the O.T. is part of those independent movies that already tufan, which are no longer so indies, which should better be called "under budget", which already have commercial and well-known actors trying to prove new things to gain popularity but it is that only make characters unfriendly or exaggerated so that they look at them. Of little outstanding, Steve Carell, which is the interpretive challenge of the movie that more is appreciated, in addition to being one of the better defined characters. The other roles are not more than the typical scheme of independent movie that wants to be appreciated as such. As in a history of Brooklyn still well, the moralina and moral from this film is so blatant and less elaborate than if any another film with marketing to the beast would be qualified americanada, reactionary or even facade.Come on, that this film, for me, is a perfect proof that how marketing of the "indie", marketing at the end, get some sector of public, supposedly indie, to dispose in praise, when it is nothing more than an interesting comedy with three good moments, some another sparkling dialogue and a couple of notable details.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2575

Caty

Alejandro Magno

muchocine

A film entirely on the lot. Good special effects and good costume, but the script makes water everywhere and the characters are not located.

Who was this Alexander the great and why is so important from the historical point of view?. This is a question that many people will be when you are finished watching the film after attending life in the Macedonian conqueror film directed by Oliver Stone. Why was Alexander a military strategist so bright? What it differed it from the other generals of his time? What were your dreams, aspirations and frustrations? Why does it aroused so much fascination among his followers? In its attempt to humanize an important historical figure, the screenplay written by Stone, Longipedunculata Kalogridis and Christopher Kyle, get barely portray the character as an insecure and weeping subject whose sole purpose military was reaching the end of the world. Yes, there are references to his concern for culturally unifying East and West, but this is in the background, giving this place a "geographical" curiosity and a desire to avenge the death of his father, allegedly entrusted by King Darius of Persia.Comenzando already with a grotesque historical error, Alexander has, as one of its major failings, poor narration by Ptolemyplayed by Anthony Hopkins, although they serve to summarize the viewer various facts that would occupy hours of projection, explanations of Ptolemy fail thanks to the inexplicable events selection by the three writers who simply ignore most of the key incidents in the formation of the nature of the character. An example: despite having been responsible for almost all of the education of Alexander, Aristóteles is only seen in one scene, in which seems more concerned to justify - for the public - the future relationship between the protagonist and his friend Hefestion, than in teaching the young.More that later, after illustrate the conflict of Alexander at being divided between the political machinations of the mother and the brutality of the father, the film jumps eight years in time, preventing the Viewer to see, for example, participation essential of the hero somewhere that another battle next to King Filipo, when their ability to conceive strategies was revealed. The battles, mounted in a somewhat confusing way, can even impress thanks to the air intakes and the use of a huge number of extras, but unquestionably pale if compared with similar sequences seen in "The return of the King", for example. On the other hand, the second battle contains the level more beautiful of the tape: one in which Alexander, mounted the horse Bucephalus, is facing an enemy that is on an elephant. Hitting in rescuing the admiration that Alexander felt by Achilles (which included the love of Achilles by Patroclo). Unless the film has the value not hide what was between the protagonist and Hephaestion, as happened in Troy, where Patroclo was transformed into the "Cousin" of Achilles, naturally portraying relationships between two men of the time (the concept of homosexuality simply didn't exist). Stone includes various levels in which we see soldiers kissing during feasts and Orgies, but inexplicably acobarda when dealing with Alexander. If it is clear that Hephaestion (portrayed in a manner too archetypal) and the main character they love, but they do not give a paltry kiss in the projection. On the other hand, the sex scene of the hero with the beautiful Roxana, is shown in wild form, reaching the point of ridicule, thanks to the exaggeration in the interpretation of Rosario Dawson. But accuse Dawson of exaggeration becomes an injustice if we compare his character with Angelina Jolie, passing the film alternating two looks: seductive sorceress and villain stars. Apart from that, the simple fact that they try to pass as mother of Colin Farell (is only one year more greater than the real-life), is enough reason for not see you sense to his election as Olympia. Val Kilmer is the only convinces with its character, leaving the interpretation of Farrell in something very normalito with the same tone of voice throughout the film and a histrionics that exceeds normal.Finally, Oliver Stone reveals a disappointing tendency to melodrama than I ever had observed in his works anteriore s-basta count the number of times a character shouts a novel "NOOOOO" during the slide.Therefore, and in my opinion, a film entirely on the lot. Good special effects and good costume, but the script makes water everywhere and the characters are not located.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2070

Rafa Ferrer

Trainspotting

muchocine

A tape of cult, pending for more than one... Perhaps one of my favorite movies, this second film from Danny Boyle, starring an unknown (at the time) Ewan Mcgregor, role that you throw fame, both to him as Robert Carlyle.

First of all wanted to start with: choose life, choose a job, choose a career, choose a family, choose a big television that you cagas, choose washing machines, cars, compact disc and can opener electric equipment. Choose the salt, low cholesterol and dental insurance, choose to pay mortgages to fixed interest, choose a flat, you choose your friends. Choose sports clothing and suitcases to game, choose to pay in installments a suit brand in a wide range of fucking fabrics, choose DIY and wondering who pussy you are on Sunday morning, choose to sit on the couch to see tele-concursos that dull the mind and crush the spirit while you filled your mouth fucking junk food, choose rot you oldcagando you and pissing you above, in a miserable asylum, remain a burden for the Brats selfish and made dust that you've created to replace you, choose your future, choose life.Perhaps one of my favorite movies, this second film from Danny Boyle, starring an unknown (at the time) Ewan Mcgregor, role that you throw fame, both to him as Robert Carlyle. Perhaps this film, although it has an air gamberrete and rebel, along with "Requiem for a dream" along with "Diary of a rebel" would be the trilogy should see many Brats that begin to flirt with the joints a day, another day with the "tripis" and at the end just falling into the "jaco". Personally, find me a movie that starts awesome to see how everything goes twisting, with quite hard scenes (won't reveal anything although I guess that 90% of you the you have seen) and with some hilarious scenes. Now there is a very good DVD release for the movie lovers, only has one catch!He says comes a poster and a lie! (so you walk with eye). Anyway, that if to this we add an acojonante soundtrack, with themes of Brian Eno, Iggy Pop, Lou Reed, Underworld, New Order and even Damon Albarn can say that we we have a movie!ALMOST PERFECT!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/536

Daniel Galindo

Vete de mi

muchocine

Knowing that in an unfair manner, the title will pass unnoticed in the stream of releases on the Bulletin Board, we can only strongly recommend attending this homemade war as an observer in no man's land.

Ingredients to make a good cake: three solid actors, a conflict situation and a director with accurate look ready to roll without brake to interpretive flow. Join the idea that there is no argument more interesting than life itself, so the actors are puppets in a little theater which we know well. One of them takes the role that receives the slaps on the face of the other two. It is Juan Diego, which makes us believe that you dealing with the situation posed you, because it even has occasion to focus on acids winks to the theatre and the leisure industry. This is a bittersweet film of parents and children: is the second Director of the pupil by José Luis García Sánchez and trace a problem of enormous proportions when a child decides to occupy the House of his father. A from there, the existence of pathetic as we know it, with their misery, grace, and their successes, which also cause laughter. Few tapes exude a humor so subtle and real as this exercise featuring a not so young compulsive liar and an adult whose life falls apart, or arranged, as you look at it. The melodramatic tone connects with the idea of fun is responsible for the more unfortunate that glory excellent? his debut as Director and screenwriter. Meta-Theater Gallery of secondary characters supports the comic moments, but beyond this, their reactions are all stunned witness logics. We are too: see how the family, unstructured once, is dissects member to Member, the head of the family including lover. The naturalistic, realistic, approach is not diluted until the end, with a curious and suggestive sequence that we will not give more details. It is of course veteran Sevillian actor who now is the role of father lost in its principles. It supports almost the entire weight of the footage, without forgetting the plot skeleton designed by Jonás Trueba. Knowing that in an unfair manner, the title will pass unnoticed in the stream of releases on the Bulletin Board, we can only strongly recommend attending this homemade war as an observer in no man's land.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1504

Florinda Chic

El último rey de Escocia

muchocine

The film by Kevin MacDonald is very entertaining, surround, shocking and even at one point has a harrowing twist in the line of the Midnight Express. With all this needless to say, that I recommend it strongly.

The last King of Scotland comes to join these particular memories of Africa that Hollywood is making in order to sell popcorn and step, denouncing abuses faced by the continent's Western society: the constant gardener, blood diamond and Hotel Rwanda.Sin however, this story is distancing itself from the others. In all the films mentioned above, there is a more or less seasoned hero who at one point or another of the film becomes aware Savior of mankind. The last King of Scotland, is not only a monstrous work interpretive Whitaker, also is the story of a Faust sold his soul to the devil for little more than solid mulatas, swimming pool and bottles of Dom Perignon. The seller is a Scottish doctor - who plays lost adrenalítico, James McAvoy - no sign of heroism and irreproachable conduct, ultimately, one of our. This character we see him desvirgar his innocence as he falls into the clutches of the erotic power of that purchase, Idi Amin, and see you the overnight become his physician, psychoanalyst, Director and above all jester.The figure of the tyrant dictator mad, megalomaniac and child and mental horny buddy, I can not think another actor who could have done better than Whitaker. And even to the surprise of his fans, get the Agent Scully, i.e. Gillian Anderson, which I recently saw also splendid and poking fun at herself in Tristram Shandy, the last of Winterbottom.La film by Kevin MacDonald is very entertaining, envelope, shocking and even at one point has a harrowing twist in the line of the Midnight Express. With all this needless to say, that I recommend it strongly, because although you have never heard talk of Idi Amin, and you import a radish African dictatorships, the history is not at all distant and is a magnificent film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/765

Daniel Galindo

Los fantasmas de Goya

muchocine

Milos Forman have a rather biased look at the complex Spain of late 18th century. It does so through a film also troubled and quite irregular.

You can be accused of lacking reliable reality but he defends argued that told a story, not the history with capital letters. Not going to see a portrait of the artist as he did Carlos Saura Goya in Bordeaux or, saving discrepancies, Bigas Luna in Volaverunt. Francisco de Goya takes second place: is not the protagonist but the witness of a few facts that during the first few minutes get hooked to then lose interest and consistency, for unnecessary dalliances.Da same be Javier Aguirresarobe behind photography, costumes have been designed by Yvonne Blake costume (with Oscar and 4 Goyas) or that it rodase in locations where the past comes alive. The libretto, the spinal column, weakens by an excess of Manichaeism: have good ones, which are until they cease to be so; the bad, the inquisitors, come to recognize the ineffectiveness of its methods.It has two distinct parts. On the second half flies the bird of the folletín, not without some burlesque tone, logically without trying it: the transformation of the character of Bardem hard to believe; Portman has good moments, by repetitive, are heavy. It appears that the protagonists are encorsetados in their characters, more concerned about not disappoint his followers with one film. Those who give life to historical portraits - Stellan Skarsgard as Goya - Swedish are delimited by the sight of the more literate; the rest, rather, José Luis Gómez is the one who walks with ease, despite incredible testing. Milos Forman (Amadeus, Valmont) is recreating past drawing parallels with the present. Here has tried to condense many aspects, too many and not very well yarn, a stage in our history which we were unable to capitalize. Challenge for a foreign director that passes a priori to be more critical and be more interested in the story than the patriotic. After the thrill is the impertinence by contextualizing the plot with topics in the style of Hollywood, emerging Spain that want to see, as well as Memoirs of a Geisha showed Japan through Western eyes. After the drubbing comes the defense because we must not be attributed to a filmmaker roles that do not correspond, as Professor of history.As product can work with luxurious sequences as containing an engraving process. And we are sure that we were not wrong in saying that you like more outside our borders that inside, where more than one is has been imagining the movie that could have been so juicy human material. We are still eager to enter through the cinema in a pictorial universe as varied, but you will have to agree with the purists: the paintings in the Museum.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2333

Antoni Messa

Historia de un crimen

muchocine

If they already saw in his day Truman Capote, not give them laziness facing this new vision. A parallel vision but with very different elements. Do not miss. Neither better nor worse than its predecessor: simply a brilliant film.

The film world is sometimes funny, not to say absurd. Years and years without approaching ever a bizarre figure of the defunct Truman Capote for which, with one blow and with little more than one year apart, have released a couple of titles that, apart from having the writer as a character, discusses the process of construction of A blood cold, one of the best regarded as works of contemporary literature and was taken to the big screen, by Richard Brooks.A in the late 1960s and masterfully, regret that the production of the two films was almost parallel, the first to arrive was Truman Capote, an excellent recreation of that phase of the writer why, Philip Seymour Hoffman, would get the Oscar for best actor because of his unforgettable creation. Just last Friday premiered history of a crime, the pathetic Spanish translation of Infamous, a much more subtle title and that, moreover, in its attractive opening credits, allows its director Douglas McGrath, a curious chanza with the aforementioned word that by removing one of its consonants, manages a witty portrait on the bipolarity of the character of Truman Capote. So, I Famous (famous Yo), with the emergence of the "n", then becomes InFamous (infamous).The comparison between the two films is inevitable since both indisputable way, looking for the same, although the treatment and final intentions are quite different. The two depart from the same fact: the discovery by Capote, a story in the New York Times, which reported the brutal murder of a family of farmers, and the fascination it awoke in the writer. While Truman Capote was quite cold and distant with his characters, a crime story seems to clothe them much more, at the time its Director wields his courage courage to draw the writer as a being somewhat Manichaean, individualistic and ill with arrogance. His relationship with one of the two accused to the crime - who was interrogated to obtain personal data for its novel, clearly demonstrates such a description, since it scales between attraction and falsehood.But where the film better moves in two very specific aspects and which, in general, dominates a tone of comedy may remember, on many occasions, in the style of humor used by Woody Allen in similar situations. First is the satirical way of presenting to the snobbish intelligentsia of New York in the 1960s, a group of elitist pedants quibble, in their own way and in his universe, were not more than a circle of porteras chafardeando in a hairdressing salon. And, secondly, in the humorous game perpetrated by Douglas McGrath with the presence of a type as unique as Truman Capote in the middle of the small enclave of this America deep in which occurred the bloody crime; an America not just understand the mode and the gestures of the writer and who, in his eyes, turns into a kind of Martian just arrived from another planet.History of a crime is an elegant, witty, funny and crude; very crude. A perfectly orchestrated product that, by its treatment becomes a wonderful complement of Truman Capote, its predecessor title, and in which English Toby Jones, giving life to the renowned American novelist, has nothing to envy to the November Seymour Hoffman. Personally, I would say that Jones emphasizes less exaggerated gestures of the character and is physically, even rather similar to the real. And there, next to this man often and, at times, both infamous, is she: a Sandra Bullock able to accept new challenges in your career and bring them forward with high note. Giving life to Nelle Harper Lee, author of to kill a Mockingbird and intimate friend of Capote, the Bullock is surprising and overwhelming, and atypical work, just giving an intimate dimension to a woman that, ultimately, was the only person able to understand the ambitions of the writer and the obsession of this by creating a new type of journalism.If they already saw in his day Truman Capote, not give them laziness facing this new vision. A view parallel but with very different elements and that, above all, escarba in the creative and psychological difficulty of an author for wanting to always overcome his earlier work. A perfect congregation between comedy and melodrama in which, at the same time, it can recover the presence, among others, actors of the stature of Sigourney Weaver, Isabella Rosellini, Jeff Daniels or the very James Bond (Daniel Craig), here converted into Perry Smith, one of the two criminals who were sentenced to the death penalty.Do not miss. Neither better nor worse than its predecessor: simply a brilliant film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3345

Ramón Besonias

American Gangster

muchocine

Can blacks play to be gangsters?

The genre of gangsters (if it is that you can be described as well) has inherited much the Lair of the western by the nostalgia of universes that do not already belong in the modern world, but that attract our attention, either for freedom and desparpajo with which their heroes campan at ease outside the law, or cloudy coherence of their codes of honorsometimes sensible and moral which he runs with magnificence the so-called civilized world (the Godfather is the emblem of this trend of gender).Is why American gangster begins with a scene in which a tired and skeptical "Bumpy" Johnson, confesses to his driver and successor Frank Lucas (Denzel Washington) be surprised by the new world that will leave, without moral or personal relations, dominated by large international corporations. "The good old days are gone.""Bumpy" Johnson really existed (as almost all those who populate the plot of the film), and therein inspire the black Godfather in the films Shaft in the 1970s. Johnson embodies the gangster principles, with a sort of Robin Hood to the poor of Harlem. But in addition to this, "Bumpy" Johnson became an icon for the black community to dare to compete with the white mafia of Italian origin. In fact the character protagonist, Frank Lucas, though he does not possess the spirit of his predecessor and more moves by the simple motto of you eat or you eat, does serve during the tape as an emblem of black power. In any other scene of drops this thesis, and is not difficult to see how the film opts for introducing, though slightly, the racial clash in the gangster world of the 1970s.But don't think the viewer that American gangster offers a cinema to the Spike Lee. Scott, like signal of more or less unequal factory premium visual spectacle to the narrative depth (ya, know about Blade Runner); If anything is allowed to dress a superficial background of social conflict, epic flavored Serpico (in regards to the character of the COP Richie Roberts) and a true whiff to the typical American eulogy of the man himself. And if you press me, travels parallel to the recent Zodiac, playing to the dialectic between the police (of personal life disordered but moral professional flawless) and the gangster (of personal life peaceful but moral dubious) in addition, American Gangster does not add to the genus major reforms beyond a touch of paint marked by a smart pace, not decaying despite his footage, and an excellent technical invoice. They are not few virtues for a product that doesn't disappoint to who look for a time. But that any Navigator be swayed by the songs of siren song of the promotional merchandising, which proclaims American gangster as a new masterpiece of the genre, to the height of the Padrino.American gangster contains significant gaps of script, while 157 minutes give to much. No profiling with solidity character more childish doctrine of the saved who can deflate the possibilities of providing the set of an epic or a lyricism Yes possessing other great works of the genre. The main character, starring a nothing credible Denzel Washington (force Yes seen in tapes like training day), contrasts with the sharper profile of Russell Crowe in a well nuanced role and edges. Highlights some coup d ' script, such as the scene in the bar with the brothers, to surprise a viewer delivered to what waiting is in the end a juicy narrative boiling, not to the Scarface Brian de Palma, but at least.American gangster he notices not knowing very well what wants to be Mayor. It starts well, delineating the biography of an interesting character, but the script is soon diluted in Fuzzy lines that emulate other similar works, but that level it to mediocrity. And I say mediocrity because it looks the intention of Scott to offer an outstanding, classical history that says now.The final scene indicates the search of filmmaker (as also tried it unsuccessfully Scorsese with its Gangs of New York) of a discourse on the nature of the violence in their country, especially that caused by poverty which plunged to African-Americans, displacing the bleak territory of delinquency and marginalization, but in the end is silenced by White America, that which was sent their boys to die in Viet Nam. To this is added, the widespread corruption that zanganea around all Mafia order (especially the drug business), exemplified here by police.American gangster not excited. You can amaze at times, taste of fragmented scenes more or less well resolved and showy manner, but does not offer the dramatic intensity nor the internal coherence of the Yes are touched other works of the genre. Which writes suspicion that Scott is too concerned about like, and that is a task that works with products of epic light but effective as a Gladiator, but not here. American gangster Scott wants to play to be Coppola, combined with the visual mastery of a Brian de Palma, but comes a hybrid to fit best.Noteworthy is the obsession of the character by seeming to be a white which goes unnoticed among many, and how he complains to his brother his racial attire. These scenes amply outlined us more disturbing reflection of the film. If you want to be a racial gangster, at most you will get is to sweep the streets with your dirty body. If you travistes you Rico white, you can then enter the game (if whites you make clear). That is why the resolution of the plot could not be less than ironic. Judge for yourselves.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2109

José Antonio Bermúdez

300

muchocine

awake 300 spectators. Because any brave proposal creates controversy. For now, Snyder is on the right track. A filmmaker of the new century.

Zack Snyder with his second film proposes a cinematic experience. It is not a novel experience but, rather, brave. And as often happens in the world of cinema, any type of differential value has to face, fortunately, the controversy. 300 baby of two important references of the last film of the 20th century: Matrix and Gladiator. From the visual, the virtual, the accelerated narrative discourse and music. the Wachowski Brothers film. On the other hand, the recovery of the epic film under the prism of Ridley Scott; talented director that opened new horizons with Alien and Blade Runner. how to tell the same story (we are talking about battles, Gladiator, historical episodes, revenge, heroes.) but from the perspective of the new century, in which the audience has grown with different values and from the visual, it has fueled video game and advertising (not forgetting the music video clip).Matrix was the first formal proposal and revolutionized the scene. Gladiator was the surprise. A classic story from modernity. Followed fashion, exploiting you the boom of the genus, with Troy and Alexander the great. And as often happens, when exploited more than enough coxswain the thing it stalls. These two films provided nothing already met. In any case, they stirred up the interest of those who wanted to relive past experiences. The same happened with without forgiveness, the recovery of the western, or saving private Ryan, new war exploits.The next step gives Snyder with 300. Specialist, to date, update genera. His previous film was one of zombies: the dawn of the dead. Now in 300 revitalizes the epic film through a speech well known for thirtysomethings enthusiasts (ultimately the public of this type of film): the comic. Snyder has drunk from the comic book and moves it to the screen. It does so in the hands of the work of Frank Miller. To bear in mind that the next production of Snyder is another comic, Watchmen's Alan Moore.El cinema, purely commercial, ran out of stories and industry resorted to an inexhaustible source of superheroes of Marvel and Dc. It now remained to delve into this post-modern comic, more well of antiheros, such as that proposed by Miller (remember the adaptation of Sin City). The visual over the speech. Aesthetics as a discourse. Virtual reality becomes the main protagonist. The special effects in the service of the creation of new worlds. The Anatomy of the action goes beyond the screen. The marginalization of any talk of political or ideological. I, at least, do not see. A satire? It may be. awake 300 spectators. Because any brave proposal creates controversy. For now, Snyder is on the right track. A filmmaker of the new century.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2896

Plissken

Death Proof

muchocine

Excellent new lesson from film of the best American director of the moment.

With 'Death Proof', Tarantino does more than (re) influencing their common places from the start: ambiguous, when no delinquents moral characters; action measured sparingly (except 'Kill Bill vol. 1', clear); soundtrack and atmosphere that referred to the 70's, without locating the story in that decade; and most importantly, the flag of his film: the dialogues. Endless, inconsequential, trivial, "cool", bizarre, and of course, essential to understand the characters that trigger them. We know something of Joe Cabot that not reveals its authoritarian anger to 'Reservoir Dogs'? We guess to understand that Jules Winfield forgive life to two half morons thieves if before we not learned of his intention to leave everything? Would the revenge of the bride the same magnitude if soon not hear, own voice of Bill, the reasons which had to destroy his life?The argument of 'Death Proof', true, is summarized in a line: crazy steering wheel stalk incautas young and pursues them until death. This anorexic synopsis allows Tarantino to do what pleases with the Slasher genre, and unlike his colleague Rodriguez avoids clone others regarding the gender. Breaks the initial premise of 'Grindhouse' (at the bottom, first, and in the form below) and Bill almost two hours of references to all the films that he is interested in, but in the way that he likes: through the dialogues. Yes, endless, inconsequential, trivial, "cool", bizarre and essential to understand the characters that trigger them. Can you shorten? Of course. But do is renounce its main feature as an author. Or not the conversation about Madonna at startup 'Reservoir Dogs' can cut and the film "understand perfectly"?With regard to technical level, Tarantino, simply doesn't know to do a vulgar movie. A first part in accordance with the crappy spirit of the project gives way to a second part a lot more stylized, but both leave patent power of the cinematographic vision of the director. And no need for CGI, or epatantes levels from a helicopter. It's start-up scene, use of color and originality of the points of view choose. The persecution of cars is a good example of the visual capacity of of Knoxville, but not the only one in the film. Notable high debut of Tarantino as director of photography.And in regard to actors, Excel a huge Kurt Russell, able to give the two sides of his character without problems, and the almost-rookie Zoe Bell, double for Uma Thurman in 'Kill Bill' action; both give a tremendous charisma to his characters at key moments, not easy mission by contradictory nature (and pathetic moments) by fierce competition from the rest of females of the second and the first. Very large, also, the as usual Michael and James Parks in a small but important role, because with its funny dialogue (again the dialogue) allow Tarantino return to rethink the exciting game that has been proposed from the outset, but with new cards and close the main plot of the film.And I know that many it seem empty, and many seem an autohomenaje, and many others that Tarantino is no longer what it was. I left excited about film, humming the song credits, laughing at me still the excellent end, agreeing the dance of Vanessa Ferlito, trying to retain all those details that I still liking this guy film. Mainly, the dialogues.Excellent new lesson from film of the best American director of the moment. a 9'5.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2200

Bruji

Diario de un escándalo

muchocine

Do do in this story, we find ourselves (not may be!) with a recurring voice in off and with the employment of? the no less socorridos - flashbacks, fashionable? and so bad used - in the film of recent years, especially in reference to tailored scripts.

Diary of a scandal? at least to the Spanish public - is not more than the Chronicle of a long-announced event and, with all luxury of details, destripado. A continuous process of advertising absurdities that lead us to a film that already nothing surprising, even the promotional poster of "woman against woman", usual stance of feminists of ABBA, a Barbra Streisand album cover, and why not say it? a clear plagiarism of the aesthetic Almodóvar. The precise adjective that is capable of expressing what trailers editors could do with some films has yet to be invented. They are supposed to be the first only the advance of the latter, never the abridged version of these. Ultimately, it is about selling an illusion without disclosing its contents.In the event that we discussed today, resorting to the term "barbarism" would be insufficient. This trailer is not limited to show some desubicadas images, highlight an effective phrase and conclude with a couple of associative indications. There is much more. Let's say that the whole of the argument is extensively detailed in a meticulous story, carried out in impeccable chronological order. The few álgidas scenes that does not emit (namely dos), would be known thanks to its four nominations to the Oscars, and the synopsis official (featuring thirteen lines) is responsible for clarifying the doubts of the confused. A nothing elegant way to banish the goddess surprise, that the lovers idolatramos.Do to get into this "tale of friendships and sexual poisoning" (as defined by its director), we are (not may be!) with a recurring voice in off and with the employment of? the no less socorridos - flashbacks, fashionable? and so bad used - in the film of recent years, especially in reference to tailored scripts. Without being Billy Wilder, Richard Eyre apply both techniques with extreme neatness, stood well above the contemporary filmmakers (we can think at Todd Field). A virtuosity that is appreciating in the direction of actors, in the resolution of dramatic scenes, excellent configuration of a perfect thriller and masterly treatment that tackles burning issues, such as the harshness of solitude, self-destructive life trajectories that derive from certain reprehensible behavior and irrationality that surrounds all kinds of falling in love.However, it is easy perceived the presence of a factor that clashes, which leads to the unreality of the events and reducing the credibility of the story. An aspect which comes from the adaptation of the novel. In Zoë Heller's book, the story is narrated in the first person, is a daily newspaper, which is why all the situations and characters are covered with absolute subjectivity, through the eyes of Barbara Covett. To transform the original text into screenplay by initiative of the own Patrick Marber, disappears the storyteller, creating a vacuum to try to rebuild the psychological characteristics of the rest of the characters. None of them looms with precision and the injured gran is Sheba Hart, the true protagonist, that looks blurred to collect life of its own outside the newspaper. His candor, the ingenuity with which faces adversity, the unit which contrasts with a Bohemian past invented by writer and, above all, the absence of a basic instinct of family protection is unlikely. Despite this, both female performances are unforgettable. It is possible that the great Dame Judi Dench, Lady of the British Empire, deservedly awarded in film, theatre and television, winning an Oscar for an appearance of just eight minutes in Shakespeare in Love (John Madden, 1,998), is always remembered for the role of Barbara, chilling Professor high school. Cate Blanchett, for its part, will be to give life to the unmatched Katherine Hepburn in the Aviator (Martin Scorsese, 2,004).In any case, their nominations were properly justified. Not so much the best adapted screenplay, or the soundtrack. The first, for the reasons discussed above, and the second to be impertinent in a harrowing story in itself.And, like all urban legend? so you can refer to this cluster of misfortunes, excess of coincidences, flurry of misfortunes coming together in a single person and at the same time-, the present will not be exempt from exemplary morals. Occur to me two. Who reveals a secret of disproportionate dimensions, becomes slave to his confidant, remained at the mercy of the good or bad will of his master. Before the juncture of pervert or be seduced by the glances, devoid of evil, in a tender bite, we will always choose take a withdrawal in time, which, according to popular wisdom, is the prelude to a victory.It would suffice with a "call me when you happy eighteen"... or thirty. Okay, they are still immature, you leave in forty and pico?.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2264

Hombre Lobo

Hostel 2

muchocine

Not only satisfies the expectations of all those who we enjoy with the first part, but it meets merits to please even those who crucified.

Few films of recent years have been so beloved and defenestradas as a Hostel (2006), the second tape of the protégé of Tarantino, Eli Roth. The more benevolent her described as grossly exploitative, misogynist and xenophobic, which surprisingly much in these times in which so easily entroniza dandruff of the 1970s (perhaps is that we only want this type of tapes as something already last but not we have the courage to accept its existence today). However, were not few those who think that Hostel was one of the best bets of horror of the past year, one in which Essentials was not the amount of guts and hemoglobin released on screen, but what he meant with that particular violence, exposure of a sub-mundo of neglect and depredations was hiding behind the appearance of refined most of Western "civilization"as well as a black man I descojono made with very bad grapes. This Slovak hostel where the rich paid to torture young boys kidnapped at least thematically, is the equivalent of our time to what was then the rural 70s slasher, puteado today until the tired.But even many of them love the film were in agreement that if something is not needed was a second part. Given the particular conditions of the history, it seemed impossible that Eli Roth could draw the manga a worthy sequel. With this in mind I entered the theater, and frankly I could not be more wrong. Hostel 2 (2007) not only satisfies the expectations of all those who we enjoy with the first part, but it meets merits to please even those who crucified.No surprises as to the argument, because the scheme is largely repeated: rather than a trio of boys, this time the victims of the Slovak hostel are three American girls art students who are drawn to a supposed Spa will be where the pieces of fun for a group of millionaires eager to torture. The difference is that, on this occasion, history will be also shown us from the point of watched sadistic participants of the "Elite Hunting", especially two American millionaires who travel to Europe from the East willing to move to the "next level". It is this plot twist that gives the film a look that its predecessor lacked, and that apart from hondar in this decadent world of sadism of wardrobe, leads to the tape to completely new land. The homage to the European horror film could not be clearer, not only as regards certain sequences that replicate the work of the genus explotativo from the old world, but by the presence of former stars of the caspoteca European as Luc Merenda and Edwige Fenech diva, as well as the surprise appearance and nothing concealed by Ruggero Deodato (director of Holocaust Canibal (1980))(, another of those movies beloved/hated) in which is probably the best cameo in this year.All the other elements of the first part are there, from the increasingly bizarre methods of torture (attention to the tribute to the Countess Elizabeth Bathory) until this gang of crappy kids that you wouldn't want to be found. But what remains is that desparpajo before violence had been shown to Eli Roth in his previous films. In contrast to what we are accustomed to seeing, charcuterie in this story is beloved by the constant game that makes it. Also (and this is definitely something not so common) is good to see that the violence in a movie is not an ornament gotten shoehorn and intended for the enjoyment of the less privileged sector (intellectually at least) of the room but is an integral part of the history and the style of what you want to tell. Perhaps that is what differentiates Hostel and its sequel of hundreds of tapes of torture psychopaths who have endured in recent years. My only conclusion is that those who have enjoyed the first part have a thousand reasons to not miss this tape, but on the other hand, those who have hated should also hold and check with Roth we have a guy that you know what you do and that, sooner than you think, it might surprise us with a masterpiece.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3425

Iñaki Bilbao

Leones por Corderos

muchocine

Very estimable political Ribbon, which deals in a credible manner a topical.

Excellent movie, well directed by Robert Redford, the pair that performed by himself and a group of few but great actors/actresses.Eminently political film, which deals with a matter of the most topical, important for security on the planet with moderation and good tone. The goings of American policy with regard to the performance of their troops in the armed conflict Irak-Afganistán (which already you can add with any intention to Iran and its apparently real nuclear threat), left expressed credible and truthful, taking past and present, data that reveal the dark bastard interests of the U.S. Government. And to express it, Redford tells it in three aspects, three additional phases. Of a boy, a student at a University, thanks to world events occurring continuously, has lost the illusion in a better world where peace and justice prevail, unchecking the personal struggle that could contribute their bit in solve it.The second aspect make it up the two soldiers, old and very bright students of the University who have a rosy future, earned thanks to their efforts, prefer to take party enlisting in a war in which do not believe, but which they consider should take part in an act of social responsibility towards their homeland.And the third, the Senator and journalist, where we see with clarity the perverse connections between politics and the press, with politicians trying win her favors to have its collusion and have easier the blessing of their unsuspecting citizens who certainly mangonearán without any shame.All that counted in only slightly more than an hour and a half, so the script cannot be measured and adjusted, rich in good dialogues and, as I said before, excellent performances.A very estimable movie, that help to reflect on an issue of vital importance, making it a very fun way and nothing Manichean. It promotes free thinking and personal integrity, against wolves that threaten the confident lambs

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1272

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Lemming

muchocine

Brioso cinematic spectacle of raw digestion. Everything becomes, says of this very decent work of Moll, in a vacuum device in between the dreams and the real impostada Crazy Horse of fable and the social test to the donkey.

My ignorance in the Zoological field not repaired in the lemmings are a rodents that inhabit the Arctic tundras. Nor that carried his small back the legend that suicidaban mass. The film that takes its name from this animal, about which we hear is in a pipe, as the title is a comedy with dramatic purple (which isn't it) or a drama with comedic overtones. The invading lemming is the metaphor of the complex network of relationships that keeps a marriage stable and normal attending, among the astonishment and indignation, the clashes of another couple, their bosses, which autoinvitan to a dinner. In French cinema, the approach is not new: it's termination of a way of life and the faint but painful evidence of otherwise, less pleasant, necessarily more pungent and hostile, nests in any corner, Crouching, to waiting to occupy the space in which earlier, nowhere near, imagined to be. Theatricality is very forced very à la française, coligiendo that we are going to attend the pomp of the decline of a bourgeoisie prone, desasosegada always a tension that sometimes, generates a tremendous violence. The script desajusta of topics when it embraces, without blushing, fantasy, imagination spurred by this phantom lemming that has come from the tundra and has settled in the talks, in the desserts in all machinery and bizarre of this artifact of raw digestion, but interesting and valuable to bolster the idea that European cinema is great and can move away from American billswithout renouncing a brioso film show. There are some scenes in real action: more action in many call the mobile Van Damme.Moll, the German director of which we knew Harry, a friend who loves you, is not Claude Chabrol. Neither the now relevant Haneke. Moll is the hidden lemming in the pipe: lurks in the go world of the tubes which share with us a House and spits (the verb is acid and carefully designed) a comedy him/her, dazzling at times, archetypal in its resolution, disconcerting in all long footage offered to us.The blackness of the plot, the heightened thriller that goes on below and the metaphysical nightmare that suspends all action in a bizarre dream or fiction idea becomes an autoindulgente proposal for style, never Candida, grows more and more twisting, is taken by a rugged superposition of layers under which nestsunchanged, the seed of the disease that is destroying civilized tradition of the European family. Dinner enrarecidas like this had given in a Woody Allen in State of grace a comedy just as him/her, but aditamentada with a more accessible but equally corrosive humor. Everything becomes, says of this very decent work of Moll, in a vacuum device in between the dreams and the real impostada Crazy Horse of fable and the social test to the donkey.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1530

Rafa Ferrer

Ciudad del silencio

muchocine

Tremendous in all its splendor, a tape that does not leave anyone indifferent and that it should be compulsory viewing.

Am curious to J - what a role (and almost a record) deferential to which we are accustomed, leaving this time was the last environment glamorous romantic comedies that, fortunately or unfortunately, we are accustomed, juntandose with our most international "Antoniou", a tape that could be perfectly on the "alternative" side of the film more serious and rigorous, with this film, who plays a theme as real as life itself, in which the hardness of it leaves us out during good part of the footage.It is not easy to play a topic which tells the tape of Gregory Nava, since there are many interests at stake, on the one hand, the multinationals that have led their companies to produce cheaper the more best Mexico, (those $5 paid per hour of work the "maquiladoras"), then see how Mexico does nothing to prevent the systematic of innocent women massacre; It is not something that has been invented for the film, is something sadly real, hundreds of women die raped in Mexico after leaving work, it is hard, paradoxical in the times in which we are, but so.Sorry for the roll, but so intense tape, can not let go, and even highlight the presence of our Juan Diego Botto, also on screen, sharing images (and others) with Jennifer Lopez Finally, tremendous in all its splendor, a film that does not leave anyone indifferent and that it should be compulsory viewing.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/794

JohnTrent

Saw 3

muchocine

Its creators have been allowed to carry by the merely conformist, possibly to knowing that you do not have to do much to bring the film back to be a considerable success at the box office.

Do if in recent years there has been a series of terror that has managed to unite to the general public? both fans to the genre as those who are not interested in too - with the box-office success and the opinion of some sectors of criticism, this has been the start by "Saw". And is that, now that the third installment hits theaters we can see how the expectation has not decreased and that, far from threatening to leave hit the fans, their scores in certain pages are not negligible (IMDB: 6.6;) Film affinity: 6.1), although there are admittedly in decline with respect to the two previous installments. It is not for less, since this third installment is the weaker of the three, as well as demonstrate a lack of ideas is charged even in the pace of the plot. Despite this, the film does path of the $ 80 million in United States? and its budget has been a 10.Los background of the psychopath.In 2004, with a budget of only $ 1.2 million, the young director James Wan won with his second film, "Saw", one of the "sleeper" of the season and one of the most profitable movies in a long time. Is that, their 102 million dollars collected around the world gave good proof that the public was increasingly accepting truculenta terror? although, to tell the truth, this first installment was rather little explicit - after the somewhat bland Decade of the nineties. "The film also became a big hit in DVD market and was quickly created a considerable Legion of fans to his around, impatiently awaiting the new torture than Jigsaw (the murderer of the puzzle) had designed for the new victims of their game."Saw "a few months later get"Saw 2"(spectacular) example of shooting at high speed." Change to the director, James Wan, by (the also little known) Darren Lynn Bousman and the budget, despite being somewhat larger, continued to be negligible; 5 million dollars. The success of this sequel was even greater to that of the first delivery, calculating its fundraising world in $ 152 million. The film, for its part, eliminated the factor surprise of its precedent for entering roads purely gore (always within certain trading patterns). Augmented the torture, the cruelty of the same and the number of characters that are inflingidas, its makers left the cards on the table for the next installment.And became the third.Thus, one year after the second installment, already have in theaters the new continuation of the series, to be sure, again directed by Darren Lynn Bousman and in which he has also participated as an executive producer, also having something to do with in the script, James Wan, which has not helped too to save the downturn in quality with respect to the two previous ones that happened to comment below. And it is that, if the sequel worked well by accumulation, without presenting news especially interesting, in this third comes them, in part, the shot backfires. In his eagerness to loop the loop the plot in both the visual, perpetrators? emphasizing the writers, i.e. the same Darryl Lynn Bousman and James Wan - propose us a game more unhealthy if it should be that in the second, even with some component hallucinatory, more dirty than expected, but far from functioning as it should ends becoming, by lack of ideas certainly in an artifact partly hollow and wrong tack, which definitely is too a notorious neglect to advance the series with some work.So is the feeling, as it advances the plot, that the script is not going nowhere, that the characters do not stop having one greater than a monigote personality of fair and that presumably dynamic rhythm that you want to give not this extensive plot holes and therefore interest slippages.It is likely that they read my (somewhat) enthusiast criticizes close of "the Texas Chainsaw Massacre: the origin" a few days ago do not well understand my position before a film, "Saw 3", which is not far too much of what we proposed in the visual and narrative, among other things, the new proposal of the psychopath headed by leather face family.The case is that, since to give explanations, "the Texas Chainsaw Massacre: the origin", although not more than an entertainment without more work by its makers add more gore to one plot thousandfold told previously, it has an overwhelming pace at almost all times and, above all, a few characters that, at least for which this writes? I am referring to the psychopaths, not girls victims - have a malevolent charisma and effectiveness on screen that, although manages to be so settled, be effective at all times, unlike the little interesting character of Amanda, aprendiza the murderer of the puzzle, that not trasfiere far the madness and the well made histrionics of the psychopaths of worship has given the genre. Jigsaw? Well, as the second part returns to be very interesting. Several torture.If there is something that really will resist the passage of deliveries of this saga, that are torture. In the film we are dealing with are more twisted, bloody and unhealthy that so far, with the difference that are worse dosificadas in the plot. Likewise, no longer exists a real interest in the person which you happen, they simply serve as macabre divertimento for al gore addicted. And here is where I want to go, because with this new installment the saga begins to have some aroma to the unhealthy and dirty gore of the eighties. They are moments such as the cranial operation, filmed in close-up and with some fairly explicit moments, which I took directly to "Re animator" and his bad baba to show, without having to provide explanations of any kind, gruesomeness everywhere, but the most obvious case would be the mini classic entitled "Maniac" (without lead to mistakes, because that only the final climax of the unhealthy work produced more bad feeling that the saga of "Saw" Board).The visual style used to display the atrocities is once again the same. The "look" videoclipero is added to a fast-paced montage which always leads us from one side to another of the victim. So, and without losing detail, can go? in few seconds, that if - as an arm is being fractured, like a hand this being Circumstellar in a pot containing acid or as a type of his body starts several "piercing" of considerable size. All this with the unique and clear intention of seeing where the public expects another "Saw" each passing year can achieve.When we got to the end, the typical and expected plot twist makes more clear if what said above; its creators have been allowed to carry by the merely conformist, possibly to knowing that you do not have to do much to bring the film back to be a considerable success at the box office. Said twist without being surplus if it is lengthened in excess in a succession of "flash back" that tell us something that was already understood from the outset.A never-ending saga.Today, and if there were doubts, confirmed that we can speak of "Saw" as the saga of terror that picks up the relay to the once very successful "Nightmare on Elm Street" or "Friday the 13th". Is the new series which, when it begins to fail at the box office, will continue his tour of the video club or more distributions limited within the cinemas, but always giving benefits for very badly that go things, because if something has a saga "Saw" as a developer is that with two hard can be very profitable things (learn a little those who carry the Spanish film) and that there is nothing like creating an icon do pop within the genre?Jigsaw - so the Legion of fans of the character, as well as with Freddy or Jason - beyond the viewing."Do so far, and as already announced a few days ago in criticism of"Them", this French horror film makers are already confirmed to be after the cameras"Saw 4"and?"Saw 5 ".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3751

Ramón Balcells

El silencio antes de Bach

muchocine

The silence before Bach belongs to that kind of film of freely expressive, very rare nowadays, which through long and suggestive planes teaches us more than with an eternal dialogue. A work of art.

The Thursday night was fortunate to attend the preview of the silence before Bach (Die Stille vor Bach), the new film by Pere Portabella. Seventeen years ago celebrated filmmaker (which was rewarding to greet him) not placed after the cameras to make a feature film, and one wondered what would have done after so long. As well, this new project is a personal view on the influence of music in society over the years, taking as a reference to the composer Johann Sebastian Bach, the real teacher that you marked a before and an after. Lacks in any film, Portabella, a storyline: relies mainly on a succession of images to the rhythm of the music (this, certainly, is not a simple accompaniment: is the true protagonist). It's an approximation to a Europe marked by the culture and pure beauty. His memorable images delve us into a world known to all, but portrayed, here, impeccable and elegantly, as only few filmmakers could do. Portabella gives us a completely atypical cultural lesson, marked by a slow pulse (doom9), recreated with a no less common argument, with Interwoven stories, which the filmmaker little cares that they have any sense. The silence before Bach belongs to this type of cinema of freely expressive, to a very rare movies nowadays, which through long and suggestive planes teaches us more than with an eternal dialogue. And that is the unique and suggestive dialogue from the film which takes place in a bar of road, probably one of the many strengths of this magnificent work.The film opens with an image on white extremely risky, which is preceded by a tour by an empty room. We see, once finished traveling, a player piano that moves with an air of freedom throughout the room, who plays and "dances" single. Without doubt, a great start that indicates perfectly what we find: a free tour of several places that have the music as a point in common, sensuality expressed in images. It has a special starting point, which starts as just, blank. We assume, then, that this table aims to show us all this wonder, a set full of expressiveness and feelings. This is certainly a film to enjoy and be carried away, a trip that probably not carried anywhere, but in which you've had a tremendous time. Within its apparent inconexión, the various stories that occur, in addition to having the music in common, have the same slow when it comes to be counted, a delicacy and beauty that exceed the limits of the current film.This is a totally anti-commercialism proposal, a real demonstration that current Spanish film can give much more than itself, leaving orphanages in band. Possibly one of the projects, not only most daring and beautiful year-round, also of the best. Portabella's isn't exactly where everyone goes to see; Moreover, it is exclusively dedicated to minority audiences, then understand or want to understand the film as something more than a simple story with argument with three distinct parts. As I said, the silence before Bach doesn't have a clear beginning or a development highlighted nor a final like any other. It has none of these characteristics, and why I think it is a work of genuine courage, based on the power of images and music.A wonderful film not suitable for the incodicionales of popcorn and who enjoy with American nonsense: is intended, no doubt, those who want to witness something very new, adult, distant everything what they are accustomed to seeing. A real achievement that will remain in my memory over the years, due to its incredible sensuality and beauty of its contents. We must thank to Pere Portabella by leaving us take on such huge, risky, mysterious and extraordinary work of art.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1854

Tito Chinchan

Harry poter y el caliz de fuego

muchocine

I was expecting too much for the little that I found. Possibly, if you're going with moderate expectations, you'll see a peliculón (as my medium kiwi) but if you go with large illusions, you will be slightly squashed. In addition I it has become short.

My small chicks, the tito Chinchan will give a d.o. for free, just for reading this criticism. If you want to go to the cinema, Tuesday is an ideal day. About 30 people, were seeing Europe's largest screen so only us has lacked the blanket to be at home. The downside is that the service is far and that he can't stop. In addition my medium kiwi has not left me see the movie in gayumbos not be why.The film is about one year in Hogarts, the fourth, in which Harry already have hairs in some pubic area and Hermione have left you breasts. Begins with the world of quidich competition (as written), in which some strange events do not finish as expected (no, not kill Spain in the quarter of irregular way, more rare I mean). This year in Hogarts seems that they do not give classes, given that other students in two foreign colleges have come, a French girls school which release petals of flowers by walking and other rough Nordic more gross than a "Guillemot". And that is all about.I will not say that the film is the darkest and the most adult of all, given that says it all over the world. What if I say this is the one to less magic. It is not not have large doses of special effects, which you have everywhere, is that it has no worldly magic. To not appear only in class, don't these tricks which gave it a very magical air films. The usual characters do not have almost appearances, or Hagrid, Professor, Professor Severus or almost none. Focuses almost entirely on Harry, Hermione and a new teacher who has an eye for everything to 100. Moreover, incredible landscapes and amazing, special effects of scandal (the scene of the Dragon will be difficult to match) and an incomparable environment. But I is not over fill.In short, I expect much for the little that I found. Possibly, if you're going with moderate expectations, you'll see a peliculón (as my medium kiwi) but if you go with large illusions, you will be slightly squashed. In addition I it has become short.kisses.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/795

Marta

Scoop

muchocine

You are not among the best films of Woody Allen, but outperforms many of its most recent comedies and part, without doubt, the best film of humor that can be seen today.

The downside of having a career as Woody Allen is that you've put yourself the bar very high. It is difficult to please everyone after peliculones as "Annie Hall" or the more recent "Match Point". That being said, it is clear that a work which exit losing in this comparison, can perfectly overcome many of the films competing against it on the Bulletin Board. That is exactly what happens to "Scoop". Despite not being among the best films of the director New York, it beats many of his most recent comedies, such as "Everything else" or "Desmontando a Harry", and part, without doubt, the best film of humor that can be seen today.In "Scoop" Allen repeated London backdrop and returns to join intrigue and comedy as it already did in "Manhattan murder mystery". Although he fails to reach the level of the latter - which is, in my opinion, among his best works, returns to tell an interesting story form fun and ingenious, with witty dialogues and the rest of elements typical of his films. Scarlett Johansson is a young student of journalism that investigates a possible murderer from the information giving you a ghost. Yes, a ghost. Well, it is not the first time that this man plays with the absurd, nor much less, right? And the truth is that we would appreciate seeing her in a role other than bellezón, while not one of his best performances. For its part, Woody Allen returns to put in front of the camera to accompany it in its investigations and interpret, course, curious kind of always the same role. Those who hate the Woody Allen movies because it leaves Woody Allen hate also, clear. The rest will enjoy her, provided that they do not intend to director capable of beating itself everytime it launches something new. And those who still do not know - if it is someone - can have a good time in cinema with a comedy different from what is often seen regularly. The truth is that I am already expecting the next.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/563

Matías Cobo

La increíble historia de Caperucita Roja

muchocine

With the already usual winks to the musical, this comedy Adventures is not a luxury in the visual but did provide some good moments of laughter and fun.

Changing times and the classic stories for children follow them. Film, with successful films such as Shrek, has been able to get enough out of this update of tales incardinated in our collective imagination. If multiple versions of this classic have deambulado between the moral of sexual Court by Perrault and the happy ending of the Brothers Grimm, this film advocates a less dramatic and more like an action-adventure approach to the mission impossible with Matrix ramalazos. Even judging from the structure of the script, the tape keeps certain concomitancias with Hercule Poirot stories born from the pen of Agatha Christie. Do in the case of the incredible but true story of little Red Riding Hood, the detective Nicky Croac exert alter ego of the famous Belgian researcher and the four protagonists of the tale?Red Riding Hood, Wolf, Grandma and the woodcutter? they would be the four suspects will bring the facts different visions.All hide after Yes amazing stories: Riding Hood is not the happy girl that delivers delicious sweets from their grandmother, they get bored in an increasingly solitary forest; the grandmother, after his portrayal of venerable old Baker, hides his facet of recidivism risk extreme sports specialist; the Wolf is an investigative reporter who uses disguise to discover news facts; and the lumberjack is a Tyrolean aspiring actor who rehearses his role of Cutter logs for the 'casting' of an advertisement. But none of them lie. The insightful Nicky Croac must gather the pieces of the puzzle spread for each of the four stories to solve the mystery about the theft of the recipes for sweets has been forced to close most of the forest pastry.With the already usual winks to the musical, this comedy Adventures is not a luxury in the visual but did provide some good moments of laughter and fun. And witness how the revision of the stories always receives the direct influence of our society today, so impregnated by omnipresent media culture.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4137

Patri

American Gangster

muchocine

American Gangster is an interesting film and it has quality, however, leaves the feeling of that could have been much better if Ridley Scott had not conformed with the formal quality and would have gone a little further.

In the 1970s a man named Frank Lucas became one of the biggest gangsters dealing with drug that brought directly from Viet Nam, the film account the real history of this gangster and detective who captured him.Ridley Scott has directed this film about a black mobster of the 1970s in New York City, the quality of the film is very high in terms of forms, and that is the problem, which is perhaps too "formal", follows the rules of the genre to strictly and not leaves nothing to innovation.The interpretations are perfect, both Russell Crowe and Denzel Washington are perfectly their roles. The character played by Denzel Washington is a mobster who with his family is loving, polite, correct and however is able to kill with one shot point-blank in the street in broad daylight the day a person; the other protagonist is the police played by Russell Crowe, who also has a "double life" by calling it somehow, because in his work is the most honest of all and yet his personal life is nothing short of disastrous. This duality of the characters is very well worn in the film.The film can accuse you of it has a principle very slow and too fast end, something that some will like it and others not, as is my case. I would have liked that the relationship between the police and the gangster is caught when the end it had developed more, however is resolved with four strokes which lead us directly to the end.American Gangster is an interesting film and it has quality, however, leaves the feeling of that could have been much better if Ridley Scott had not conformed with the formal quality and would have gone a little further.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/197

Dover157

El código Da Vinci

muchocine

Simple, entertaining and palomitera movie made to become the taquillazo of the season

It is difficult to understand this film and its criticism without having previously read the book. But I will try to analyze it from the point of view film. But I have to say that except for some licenses not be you can brand not be faithful to the book.A film without more pretenciones than the sell and entertain the mass avida político-religiosas conspiracies that raise blisters between the more conservative. why this story is so controversial still fiction?, why the churches of the world are tear vestments with a history of many that stain the name of these institutions? Here is this very popular saying "When the River sounds, water bears" while the story is completely fictional, may that its historical context is not so much.So apart from the raised controversy, to my personally has degraded me nor I am pleased to a masterpiece. A simple, entertaining and palomitera movie made to become the taquillazo of the season. The director, Ron Howard, plasma with quite master pages of the book by Dan Brown. showing much of the scenarios where it develops the plot, some of which like the louvre Museum with great clarity and fidelity.Who is read the book can be seen with MIME and detail to managed to capture the essence of these places, the real protagonists of the film.And speaking of protagonists, one of the black spots of the film are precisely these, intoxicated by the charisma of the side. We have a deadpan Tom Hanks who has failed to capture the essence of his character, a Audrey Taotou remembered by all as the fragile "Amelie", which is its role in excess, Jean Reno in the role of Benzu Fache totally correct and credible, Ian Mckellen in the role of Sir Teabing highly rewarding but something jester and especially Paul Bettany in the role of Silas where demonstrates his talents of actor for one of the roles more difficult to film.The narrative action, the metric and the pulse of the film is chord in the 131 minutes that lasts for mixing between if flashbacks, both historical and personal, in order to better understand the context in which develops all the story. But sinning a script caught with tweezers and adapted, as far as possible, the phrases most famous book. Although there is to thank him that he has respected the different languages spoken in the history, in post of an adaptation more reliable of the book, but reassured because all have subtitles.On the other hand we have the band sound, wonderful as all compositions of Hans Zimmer, although it does not reach the height of previous scores of this great composer.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1220

Tito Chinchan

Apocalypto

muchocine

Epic film about the Mayan culture, recorded in maya with the intention of diverting the attention that almost nothing happens. Interesting, sometimes thrilling, sometimes sleeping, that is sure to not leave anyone indifferent.

This Mel Gibson makes some very strange things. First it makes Braveheart and freezes us the blood libeeeertaaaad coup. Later, she tells us the end of the Bible in the original languages and with more blood than in Kill Bill. And now comes to tell things of the Mayans, and as he likes to complicate the issue, makes us the film authentic Maya. Luckily they speak little.The film is about a Mayan village living happy without knowing that they are going to fall over. Overall, a bad day discover the inhabitants of another village, which has been destroyed by do not know who. Shortly after, these also destroyed them, being captured as slaves. Since that time, all Jaguar claw obsession is to escape from captivity to return with his family.The summary of the movie I noticed account that passes almost nothing in the two well long hours that lasts. For starters, the film is recorded in original Maya. If, in truth, in maya. What already pulls back. The script is good, but is that nothing happens. They pick up the village and try to escape, albeit with little enthusiasm. And when it seems that you're going to sleep, it ends. Being fair, I have to say that action becomes at times exciting, that produce you curious see if it saves or not. The landscapes are amazing, and the ambiance is very successful. That Yes, on the Mayans learn shortly, that not explained as he said once they were so advanced. Oh, and put rare names.In short, epic film about the Mayan culture, recorded in maya with the intention of diverting the attention that almost nothing happens. Interesting, sometimes thrilling, sometimes sleeping, that is sure to not leave anyone indifferent.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2760

Enrique Colmena

El Club de los Suicidas

muchocine

To the black humor must have very good hand: master Rafael Azcona knows a lot of that. But Roberto Santiago does not.

Roberto Santiago the previous effort in the direction, "The longest penalty in the world", resulted in a reasonable commercial impact (more than five million euros: who catch them today in the Spanish film, think more than one!), but with one more than discreet acceptance from critics. With that success, at least in the aspect of the Peel, Santiago has launched his second feature film, but does not seem to have made much progress. For the occasion suited again (because the film has already done so on several occasions) a novel by Robert l. Stevenson, "The suicide club", which is certainly not one of his most exciting works; prefer, of course, its legendary "The treasure island" and "Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde". Santiago raises the possibility of giving a group of depressed for several reasons, gathered around a group led by a psychologist therapy with serious problems of self-esteem, founding, in the manner of the novel stevensoniana one of them brings a club in which weekly touch you one die and kill him. The idea seems to work, until our protagonist eyebrow in his efforts to kill, find a new illusion. To the black humor must have very good hand: master Rafael Azcona knows a lot of that. But Roberto Santiago not: a story like this requires a touch of sinister humor that make us smile with complicity; It must necessarily be intelligent humour, and there on the screenplay of Santiago, and less on its rather pedestrian realization, glimpses of this. Some sequences to Martian fuer have his grace (cf. the ambulance at the burger bar scene, or the erotic event between Laurel and psychologist), but in general the Viewer, it will delivered, costs work stretching up the corners of the lips. Mention apart for the interpretive cast: Fernando Tejero confirms what we temíasmos: always plays the same role, whatever its character, and when it does not, as is the case with the gay "Film days" deployed boom, even worse; Lucía Jiménez is also confirming that it enjoys an inexplicable predicament between criticism, far superior to his diminished talent; Luis Callejo, anonymous face usually doomed to hard characters or outside the law, as a result of their baleful mug, gives her character a very personal tone; but all them eaten them with potatoes (and see that it is well advised, with these mollas?) Juanma Cifuentes, a new face, at least for which subscribes, but with an interpretative capacity only comparable to the many pounds over his bones that supports. All a discovery this Juanma, excellent comic vis, and with a rare ability to tell more merluzos dialogues with an astonishing naturalness. Do so, although East "club of suicide" has been a chestnut, at least we found one of those wonderful supporting actors (do because el bueno de Cifuentes it not imagined as the protagonist, given the limitations of its physical?) given by Spanish film worthy of a better than our cinematography frequently?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1746

Alex Largo

300

muchocine

Well, pretty good. A good film in which spend the money, which, in addition to being spectacular, heroic, amazing, etc, is very entertaining. But lacks? something? getting to be very good. A pity.

Remember a film that you have enjoyed, but that would have left them a strange feeling? Not be if I can explain. Do I refer to a film that is not outstanding, but that rather than excite them them to left something? I do not know? as of? "If, very well," but that basically know that something that you do not know very well what is and thus not him you've finished catch lacks it? "that".Is that not is. The movie I liked, and I enjoyed. But? lacks it something. What is it? I believe that it is the set of some things. Let's go by parts.As regards the direction of Snyder, well, good. Quite good, more than correct. Anyone can throw in face to this man that the way in which the film is shot is bad. It has style. Although perhaps is something does videoclipera? But very correct. Perhaps at times abused of certain resources, such as slow and the quick-slow-quick-slow, but as they do not compliment too, not arriving to become an ordeal.The battles are very well shot (although occasionally not so well mounted), it is obvious that they have been eager to shoot them. The film is almost in its 60% battles. And although is it missing something more dialog, the battles are very entertaining.As actors? Well the truth, no is who could say that they do wrong. Each and every one of the actors (although some sobreactúen sometimes) very well carry out their duties. Above all Gerard Butler (the Phantom of the Opera) and Lena Headey (the Brothers Grimm). The first splendid as King Leonidas, knowing give the character of a force and a charisma that make the character falls well to the public (also because it is one of the few characters that are not as a goat). The second fulfills its task far, although in somewhat dull occasions, but usually (especially in the final stretch) excellent.In the script? The dialogues are very scarce. Although not to the extent of "Apocalypto". But occasionally they miss at fault, that the film relies too much on images.For the special effects? Therefore it sobre valued. Although no one with two front toes may say are bad, occasionally are something? loose (will the Wolf, some landscapes, rhinos?). I do not understand how people can marvel at these special effects when we see other far superior. But still they give the film a very particular aesthetic, and more importantly, almost calcada to the comic.Posts to speak, I would like to comment on the (poor) responsible for make-up work. Although in the vast majority of cases right, in others, quite false (as it happens with the character of Ephialtes, or some of the many deformed that appear in the film). The soundtrack, quite rightly, conforms perfectly with the images, in an outstanding way. And the most machaconas parties are here justified given the large amount of scenes of battle.With regard to the controversy of the "attack on Iranian culture"? then? I thought that they exaggerated? but not. Do while the film is not intended to be historically faithful, show to Iranian culture as something "effeminate", not be? something? Well, the best thing is that you fijéis in the photo above, where Xerxes (the bad) "tontea" with Leonidas (was supposed that it is negotiating, but after seeing the film, I have not so clear). Already, Yes, it seems a cavalcade saccade gay (more specifically of the float of the Drag Queen), why I said that the film is historically rigorous (or so intended, as I have already said). Why no be taken too seriously in this regard. For this reason I advise: that nobody is going to see the movie thinking that going to see a faithful account of the battle of Thermopylae, that is in the history books, the film tells is all fiction.As for the film as well, in general. Well, well, pretty good. A good film in which spend the money, which, in addition to being spectacular, heroic, amazing, etc, is very entertaining. But missing "something" to become very good. A pity. As for those who claim it is a masterpiece and other work. well say that they are a bit exaggerated. The movie is good. but until that point?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4373

Tito Chinchan

Dragon Wars

muchocine

Film about two serpientazas that Chase through history a woman to become Dragon, which the mate. Special effects of Cape tail, explosions, bugs everywhere, impossible battles, etc. do argument? What else does?

Director: Hyung-rae ShimDuración: short, and becomes short. Na more than an hour and a half.Release date: March 1, 2008 do you remember a game table for many years ago that was called "The Empire Cobra"? They were three heroes that had to come to the island of cobra, going through each desert, or fire or ice. Then they came for the cobra, and if you looked at killed them. It was quite entertaining, unless you were the cobra silly character as none. That if the figure mantel horrors. What is this nostalgia treinteña attack? Therefore that it come out in this movie, the cobra and his cousin. I promise you.The film is about two large snakes such as the gas pipeline that comes from Algeria they have to sacrifice a girl of 20 years to become a dragon. One is bad and one good. Total, than the girl suffers an accident that nobody suspected in 1500 and item is postponed. But as we all have several lives, 500 years later resurrected the girl (converted into another, come on, who reincarnated) and again begins the dance of snakes. In an advertisement for pharmacies.Few movies lately are these with bug. It seems that it is a risky and brave gamble, given that daring you to remove the bug in frame 2 and that he bears much of the weight of the proceedings it is. The script is not wonderful, but we have two snakes, a deadly army, some flying bugs that Miss fire, some bugs that roam with missile launchers, helicopters, tanks, etc. is space to put all this and also give a profound script? No, and thank you. This is pure entertainment. For which you like, great.In short, film about two serpientazas that Chase through history a woman to become Dragon, which the mate. Special effects of Cape tail, explosions, bugs everywhere, impossible battles, etc. do argument? What else does? More bugs, this is war.Recommended to see one of bugs that don't stop fighting and destroy everything.Besitos.P.D: What wonderful surprise film.Pd2: It has their winks to the Lord of the rings and their battles, Transformers and bring Battlefield Earth, spirited away which equals the Dragon and King Kong for his scene of skyscrapers.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1797

Antoni Messa

El buen pastor

muchocine

A well-intentioned but failed, film in which Robert De Niro, despite placing the camera in a brilliant manner, has forgotten give life to their characters. Or rather, the character; Edward Wilson.

More than 13 years have passed to Robert De Niro, from the splendid A history of the Bronx, reinsert it behind a camera. Thirteen years that, in addition to continue playing, has dedicated has collect specific information in order to be able to film the good Shepherd, a film showing, among other topics, the birth of the CIA.The film focuses, first of all, Edward Wilson, a peculiar and man of few words who gives life Matt Damon and for whose construction have been inspired - in a manner very free - in the figure of Jesus James Angelton, the true founder of the CIA. The inexpressiveness and the usual sosería in the actor have become the unique traits that define the personality of such Wilson, a cold, extremely meticulous and (accidentally) Machiavellian type.The good Shepherd starts in April 1961, just after the failed Bay of Pigs invasion; a military operation frustrated clear ideology anti-Castro and orchestrated by the CIA; an intervention which sparked all kinds of suspicions in the minds of the American President, the by the then newly-elected John f. Kennedy. From this point, De Niro will miss hand (abusively) of the technique of flash back to take a sober and extensive look at the existence of the aforementioned Edward Wilson, one of the agents directly involved in the case. An extensive and excessive revision, of more than two hours and a half of duration, which will have place all kinds of facts, both of his private life of his actions as a government spy.A festival Matt Damon that it will delight the most staunch followers of the actor and that, in equal parts, it irritará to those who? as to a server - you do not find the trick to it. And it is that there is not a single scene in which the man does not appear; a detail, the latter partly quite logical, that everything happens through the sieve of his gaze. But my whole look, and due to his "required" stay on screen, another actor with various interpretive resources would have given more to the film and the character entity.Luck at least to alleviate somewhat the overdose Damon, you can enjoy the large campus of side excellent that surround the protagonist of the Bourne case. Some of them very blurred in their roles; other unused too long; but everyone, from the first to the last (except for one little credible Angelina Jolie), fulfilling its work effectively.Narrative delinquencies is one of the determining factors when it comes to prosecute a product which, without much loss of time unjustified, could condense into just a couple of hours. A little more than nerve and agility would have helped better digestion. And it is that this lack of verve and the slowness with which faces certain passages are contrasted, in part, with the amount of gaps, loose and not very well resolved episodes leaves along its length.It is undeniable that De Niro, despite its laudable commitment to inform the viewer of the beginnings of the CIA, has more care the visuals to the descriptive. Taking into account that the tape runs over almost three decades different (from before the start of the second world war until after the Bay of pigs incident), can be described as excellent the thoroughness with which has taken care of the aesthetic and scenographic background details. In this respect, it is not surprising that tiquismiquis of Francis Ford Coppola is credited as Executive Producer: everyone knows your desire, almost sickly, Coddling the final image to unthinkable ends.Distrust and secrecy: two concepts which define perfectly, everything that surrounds the protagonist of the good Shepherd; a well-intentioned but failed, film in which Robert De Niro, despite placing the camera in a brilliant manner, has forgotten give life to their characters. Or rather, the character; Edward Wilson, its almost unique character.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3241

Jesus Lens

Promesas del Este

muchocine

Tremendous and extraordinary film by David Cronenberg. Film noir of the best invoice, tough, direct and uncompromising. And in only ninety-six minutes, which, for the times, is quite an achievement.

It had been but very well received on the festival circuit, so the expectation was high, not in vain, the previous RAID by David Cronenberg in the black genre, "A history of violence", turned out to be an undisputed masterpiece.With "Eastern promises", the veteran filmmaker repeated with the chameleonic Viggo Mortensen, referring in this noir which, personally, I love so much. But in this case, instead of traveling to the United States.UU. It does so to a theoretically multicultural London in that, however, as many and as varied cultures coexist, but without mixing or integrate with those around them. As the Russians, for example, in this film comprising a separate group, a mafia exclusive and inclusive, a family full of rituals, symbols, keys, and relationships of the most complex, dense and variegated. And therefore the subtitled VO of the Russian dialogues gives importance to one film postmodern, faithful reflection of the complicated globalized world in that live. "Promises of the East" in a masterly film which, on the basis of the discovery of an intimate diary, escarba in the miseries of a society corrupted to the bone marrow. And it does so without moralina, without be discursive, without being giving. Through a black as tar and rough like sandpaper paper history, Cronenberg film makes a shocking denunciation of trafficking of white and the hell that awaits so many Slavic youth who come to Western Europe convinced that will find paradise. And makes it more difficult to Cronenberg: denounce these facts through the simple tell one story, narrating events that make illuminate a truth that is shows crudely in the eyes, frame to frame, without speeches or proclamations, telar sentimentality or maniqueístas dulcificaciones.We have a story with many protagonists, represented by actors in State of grace. Starting with Viggo Mortensen, who a few days ago they were expelled from a London restaurant by the earmarks of Russian mafioso who had. That had gotten into the role, we will. A Naomi Watts radiant, but obscured by rain in London and in the darkness of the locations which the director has chosen to tell a story certainly grim and gloomy.It is Vincent Cassel, enfant terrible of French cinema, which outboard to the hysterical character of homosexual locked in a closet with doors of oak and steel, but, above all, is the sober, unsettling and terribly wonderful Armin Müller-Stahl, playing the godfather of the Zakone V Vory, the Russian Mafia. Perhaps the best of the film is the sequence in which the Watts is known for the first time. On the one hand, Bewitched. On the other hand. Note that something strange there's. And even so, he falls under the influence of the friendly old man who runs an ethnic restaurant cuisine delicious Russian dishes, that cares for his son and defends their cultural roots. Atracción-repulsión. Admiración-ASCO. As in the also impressive "The music box", that the subsidiary paternal dialectic that develops between the character played by Müller-Stahl and his daughter, a sensational Jessica Lange reached unusual levels of interest and excitement.And it is, of course, the sequence of the sauna, clear. We give the word to the Canadian director: "violence is violence..." It is always bloody. "When we are talking about violence, talk of human bodies, the destruction of human bodies and then what you have to show is that they are bodies against bodies." should be more explicit? Sensitive souls, rotate the face, with noticeable grimaces of repulsion. Garantizado.Tremenda and extraordinary film by David Cronenberg. Film noir of the best invoice, tough, direct and uncompromising. And in only ninety-six minutes, which, for the times, is quite an achievement.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2973

Andrés Pons

Halloween El Origen

muchocine

Becomes to assassinate the work of Carpenter with a first part that is a prequel impoverished development with topics always shattered family and the second with murders to the rhythm of music video.

Director John Carpenter must ask itself what I did to deserve this? With the previous remakes perpetrated for the greater glory of two of his major works "the fog and assault" on Precinct 13. Apparently they shot to destroy the originals, if that was not the intention is as came out.It seemed that it could run better luck on halloween, first hired a director caused a great impression with his earlier work. Of course Rob Zombie was based in the world of authors of gender with the credentials of the House of the thousand corpses and sequel.Above a cast full of great performers known for the fan. People like BRAD DOURIF "Spontaneous combustion" KEN FOREE "Zombie", ADRIENNE BARBEAU "La Niebla" or the great Malcolm MCDOWELL "Clockwork Orange" in addition to SID HAIG and others seen in the previous films of the director. More than one are rubbing their hands with the result.Because gentlemen stop rubbing them because it becomes to assassinate the work of Carpenter with a first part that is a prequel of impoverished development with topics always shattered family. My mother drug, my father is a drunk, so I put the mask it and begin to kill.The second part are simply murders at rate of video-clip, all too fast, without the slightest edge plot. A Myers most lethal but losing great planning levels and the anguish that aired the original.The best is undoubtedly the quality of the always outstanding Malcom McDowell otherwise it might have been spared. A 3.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4333

Cecil B. Demente

La terza Madre

muchocine

The expected end of the saga of the three mothers is not the return of the giallo as they wanted us to believe, if not another handful of Earth in his tomb. Sad what they have done, hear.

The work of reconstruction of a street next to the cemetery of Viterbo allow the discovery of an enigmatic URN. The URN refers to the Museum of art ancient Rome where works the archaeologist Sarah Mandy (Asia Argento captivating) under the command of Giselle, viceconservadora of this institution. Drawn by curiosity opened the URN, finding the same inside a series of mysterious objects. What they don't know is that they just released from his confinement to Mater Lachrymarum, the return of this beautiful but terrible sorceress brings chaos to the world and leads the Italian capital to the apocalyptic point where the psychic powers of the young American student are the only hope for defeating the last of the witches which starred in the two previous films.If I were Homer Simpson abofetearía with a glove to Dario Argento and tell what "demand satisfaction" (that or it would take me a couple of Duff's and would try to forget about the whole), but as I am not, I complain style grandfather Simpson.Hay many directors who lose their direction, to corroborate there are Tim BurtonRidley Scott and Brian De Palma. The history of Dario Argento is no different, years ago he lives of renda of his early works, which has lost the favor of critics and the public, and has accommodated as old glory. That is why we want to sell this movie as a return to the origins, something he also did Kevin Smith in his time with the second part of Clerks and that went pretty well.SUSPIRIA (1977) and Inferno (1980) are the first deliveries of the hitherto unfinished trilogy of the three mothers and two undisputed masterpieces. The expected end of the saga, however, is not the return of the giallo as they wanted us to believe, if not another handful of Earth in his tomb. Unfortunate what has done, hear. The movie is bad if alone, although I suppose that if its predecessors were not sorted as if they were not so full of strength and beauty, would give less tirri the thing. But it is Mr Argento that they are there, and would be much to see them because it seems that it is the only one that has forgotten.In this third installment has put more characters, more foreign, more screenplay and more light of those two previous boards, thus breaking any kind of link with them (less is more, Mr Argento, and you should know it). If they are breathing an atmosphere of nightmare where the murderer was a supernatural and unknown figure who moved outside the laws of physics, this evil is very visible and very physical, especially because it has some tits you shit and gets balls environment throughout the film. The movie in general has a shabby appearance and videoclubero, the plot is more banal and vision that transmits the tape on the apocalypse is pretty pimp (with many points in common with what come to be the Ramblas of Barcelona a Saturday night). But the worst, what makes that I go up the colors and you want to go out to the balcony to smoke without pressing before the pause, are the ghostly moments with Daria Nicolodi. Very strong Mr Argento (you've seen Ghost, right?). Is the disaster that only comes to head such an analogy of the same caliber; that gruesome sequel of the 2001 Kubrick.La phrase: "Mother!" "Mother, you've come!"

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3534

Sandra Ríos

Diario de un escándalo

muchocine

The final seal of this film is determined by his music and so they used an important composer, Philip Glass, characterized for being manimalista when composing his scores.

This film to come out of Billboard this week ending in country, and that in the majority of other countries was released between March and April of this year with the exception of United States; was a film nominated for 4 Academy Awards; Best actress, Dame Judi Dench, best supporting actress, Cate Blanchett, best adapted screenplay and Best Original score. Although it won none of these awards, recognition through them is more than deserved.Diary of a scandal is a film adaptation of the novel with the same name published in 2001 by Zoë Heller. The film is directed by Richard Eyre, known for its Iris 2001 film, winner of several awards, including the Oscar and Golden Globe, which also starred Judi Dench. Like the majority of tapes that are adaptations of a novel, the more difficult for its director was to simplify what has been considered a novel dense, in a script that covers everything contains it over their pages. Diaries of a scandal, is a rugged of a teacher, hard, dry and rough narrative whose obsession towards his best friend; also Professor, and the secrets that both hide, carried thinking, schemed and handle various situations. Judi Dench, Barbara, who narrates and turn intrepreta writes the history. Their role is certainly exceptional. Another Professor, is Sheba Hart, starring Cate Blanchett, who in his interior, hides a terrible love story; After support romance with a student of only 15 years. Of course Blanchett, turns out to be the perfect companion in the great performance by Dench. In fact confirm both nominations in the past Oscar.No doubt that there are many positive aspects of this movie; for example, without seeing me the novel, the adaptation of the script for me, is accurate, it is a film that keeps you waiting all the time, which is very well defined the beginning, development and end, that they are very well taken. All this accompanied by a perfect setting for the tape, with a photography and lighting very well achieved. And to accomplish this, they used two important elements; the scenario was mostly recorded on the outskirts of a coastal region of London (Eastbourne), and on the other hand, the majority of its scenes were recorded with hand-held camera, which allows to give spontaneity of movements. The final seal of this film is determined by their music, and in doing so they used an important composer, Philip Glass, characterized for being manimalista when composing their scores; i.e., it uses few sentences that are repeated. Among the works featured in the film are: El Thruman Show (1996), the hours (2002), Opera (2003) and the illusionist (2006).I reiterate that this is a very good tape, which tells the obsession of a teacher, after his solitude; authentic reflection of nowadays living residents of large cities. Diary of a scandal has been catalogued sensationalist, because in fact his title does honor to its theme. A scandal of vast proportions, but that for nothing is far from the reality.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1353

Tito Chinchan

Dreamgirls

muchocine

That you do not cheat, is a musical. Notepad, huid, fainting, fingid whatever before going to see this if you don't like musicals. In addition, as we always like big donkey walk or not to walk, the abominable volume can make us bleed by the ears.

I have to admit that although the film has seemed an infumable truño, sing as God. Well, as God when you want to say something to voices, why go roars are girls. Also I have to admit, in Spain we don't have singers as well, or if we have them, the start shit Eclipse them (this has nothing to do, but there is).The film is about three girls of color (of rather mulato color) that they lose a contest of song promises, but earn a manager that must be launched them to stardom. For now, get to act doing the vocals of a singer of fashion, but the ambition of these three girls stays there. So a lie with one another with the same, one with the other and thus, singing and giving the subject passes the peliculilla.These things I go through watch movies without knowing what they will. It is that nothing happens for nothing all the time, rather than sing these young girls and Eddie Murphy. And it is that as they spend all the time preselection, then not you can pass nothing. The synopsis I have told until the last ten minutilla, to give it some emotion. And of course, if make English to understand the songs, perhaps we could climb on the bandwagon of the action. But as we stayed in My tailor is rich (which comes meaning my namesake the Richi) not because we learned anything.In short, that you do not cheat, is a musical. Notepad, huid, fainting, fingid whatever before going to see this if you don't like musicals. In addition, as we always like big donkey walk or not to walk, the abominable volume can make us bleed by the ears.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2932

Rafa Delgado

Planet Terror

muchocine

A thug full of guts surprisingly digestible, quite fun and enjoyable, with a very acceptable rate, and great sense of humor.

Finally, the two segments of Grindhouse premiere in our country (and most of Europe) separated. Although appreciated the Grindhouse stamp on the posters by Aurum, sorry, it is not the same but at least I I can not think that the Weinstein brothers have come away with: cheating Europeans by dividing the product invented by Robert Rodriguez and Quentin Tarantino, and earn twice to paste in the English-speaking territories. A business round.Finally, the last, is past, and now get to see these two tributes from Robert Rodriguez and Quentin Tarantino to the cheap and crappy B-movies, and Z, Planet Terror and Death Proof.Yo and saw Planet Terror and I had a fairly well. As I am not an expert in the Filmography of Rodriguez, I can not say or compare much, but Planet Terror is not bad. It is a full of guts surprisingly digestible, quite fun and enjoyable, thug with a very acceptable rate, and great sense of humor. It is both times to exceed the fine line that separates a film Disney and fun, a Scary Movie laughing glib and child.But good. There are creates Rodriguez a micro universe quite funny, peculiar and bizarre, that I am not surprised nothing to the bud of Texas (which I like very well, despite Spy Kids and other chungueces that has come to shoot) would like to revisit.Not recommended for those who take too seriously the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/716

Hombre Lobo

La matanza de Texas: el origen

muchocine

It is one of the worst films of terror that we had this year, from its memez of script up to the obvious shortcomings of talent of a director to know the reasons for which this saga has worked completely.

There is a whole range of options when choosing the arguments of why the Texas Chainsaw Massacre: origin (2006) is one of the worst films of terror that we had this year, from its memez of script (that adds absolutely nothing to the universe created by the original Tobe Hooper) until the obvious shortcomings of talent of a director to know fully the reasons for which this saga has worked for more than thirty years, to say nothing of shameful greed of a producer (Michael Bay, who more?) that seems willing to milking this cow until the last drop. However, the most overwhelming reason to discard this film is its unrestrained arrogance in trying to explain the origin of something that did not need to be explained in the first place. The tape of Jonathan Liebesman (prequel to the remake of the 2003) solves this with a couple of empty phrases which allude to the child Rodeo in the hope of giving birth "icon of terror" self-conscious and blatant.And worst of all is that, as in the as it was the case with his previous film, Darkness Falls (2003), the first minutes of Liebesman are not at all bad: a dirty and uncomfortable sequence in which we see a woman giving birth in the middle of a slaughterhouse to a deformed child. The child is obviously our friend Thomas Hewitt, who will later grow to become the architect Leatherface. Thirty years later, when the closure of the slaughterhouse has ordered economic death of the people and our friend and his family are left without their main source of income, he began the massacre itself. These first minutes, in which the character of r. Lee Ermey (no doubt the best of the film) "becomes" sheriff Hoyt and does his declaration of intent family never go hungry, it is the highest point of all the footage, just before the tape is released into a tailspin to the slasher territory and shamelessly go through each of the clichés normally attributed to him. However, in this case such self-consciousness is even more pathetic, that as this one prequel (occurred three years before the release of Marcus Nispel) is known from the first frame how is going to end. Hence any emotional investment one can make the victims characters is, entry, wasted. The film then becomes a festival of excesses of free design but with pasta, conceived and executed as a vulgar geek-show prefabricated for the average subscriber of Fangoria and anyone wishing to basically completely banalized offal.At first you might think that the original Tobe Hooper was little more than that, but nothing is further from the truth. Apart from the fact that its excesses were genuinely original beyond by 1974, the original film based his horror not so much blood (which wasn't much) but the portrait of the America people refused to see: one of a backyard full of ignorance, poverty and excessive violence. And still, nothing of what was in that movie was free. This prequel remake throws all of that. An example makes it more clear that none: the scene in which the protagonist is tied to a Chair and forced to witness the Hewitt family dinner scene that will no doubt know all is a direct reference to the original film. As well, in the original scene that made sense and raison d ' être, while here it has none, is merely a pop reference first, and secondly of a sample of free sadism by the characters. I could give many reasons most of the repetitive, predictable and unlikely that is each of the sequences of the film. It violent? Certainly, but that is no longer any merit in a genre where Rob Zombie, Alexandre Aja and Eli Roth have become names known to all. The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: the origin is totally bobalicona, superfluous and useless. Pass it without any remorse.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3439

Jesus Lens

Adiós pequeña, adiós

muchocine

A very good film which proves that the genus black and criminal is the best and most appropriate vehicle for filming social realism and do so with emotion, but without sentimentality. With pace, but without pyrotechnics. With talent. With so much talent.

Much has been concomitancias that the plot of "goodbye, little, goodbye" has with the history of the Mc Cann: a girl blonde who disappears without a trace, the pressure of the media, the police action, etc, etc. And yet a see view the wonderful film directed by surprising Ben Affleck, the subsequent conversation led us towards other paths, which also have to do with children and with other news ranging more than the Mc Cann and on which won't talk about, for now, to not condition to anyone viewing of "Goodbye"", small, goodbye", originally titled "Gone, baby, gone".Ben Affleck, that already won at the time the Oscar for best screenplay for his libretto on the indomitable Will Hunting, has based on a known novel by Dennis Lehane to typing a superb handful of pages that tell us a terrible story, but in a measured and adjusted to the maximum way.We are in Boston. A girl has disappeared. Or she has been kidnapped. I remember that, when studying English in school, in the famous book by Arthur Newton, had a passage in which the reckless boy left his car on the street, and when I went back to collect it, it was gone. Paragraph ended with an expressive "It's gone". I remember that I translated it as "Gone", but the Professor interrupted me. Had to translate it as "They have taken him".And it is that, as the film is responsible for show, it is not the same, one "gone" than another. However, early on there, both the police and parents, convinced that the girl has been kidnapped, so the creature aunt hires a young couple of local detectives to investigate on their own, apart from the police, given that you know all the people in the neighborhood. This form of gambling den in den of interview in interview, two detectives are peeling multiple layers of the onion at a point of no return. And up there can tell because the argument serves as a perfect mechanism of watchmaking, with turns and twists in the plot, so unexpected and surprising as, finally, logical and reasonable.Benefits of the film: many. The hyperrealist atmosphere of a Boston marginal, ugly, outlets and outskirts. The most crappy bars in the world. The more dirty and asocial in the universe tipejos.Characters, perfect combination between primary and secondary, with the always sober, credible and magnetic Morgan Freeman and Ed Harris, carry the entire weight of a film that, while there is shooting, fire, blood and violence, never there was action, in the sense that we are used in Hollywood films. It's a dry, stark, violence that hurts.And it is this vast penalty flowing from the screen. A photograph and a design of production feístas, dark, turbid. Some stony faces. Some cool conversations. All in "goodbye, little, goodbye" oozes despair, bitterness and a huge sense of broken dreams of defeat, of abandonment.A very good film, in the style of "Seven" or "Mystic river"-that "goodbye, little, goodbye" both shares in addition to the paternity of Dennis Lehane - shows that the genus black and criminal is the best and most appropriate vehicle for filming social realism and do so with emotion, but without sentimentality. With pace, but without pyrotechnics. With talent. With so much talent.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2799

Ripham

Hijos de los hombres

muchocine

Totally recommended, a science fiction, not as science and perhaps not fiction. You love all those who like films of near future, “ without naves ”.

What a surprise! It was only rumours of this movie, and the book of P.D.James have not read, with which it had no very clear with what I was going to find. And I find a good movie with a brilliant and chilling atmosphere. The England of the 2027 the world towards destruction, domination of the most overwhelming, militarized and xenophobic right, is terrifying …. and horribly credible, might not be so distant future. The scene in which the refugee camp you completely surrounds.The story is very good, original (although that one may think it is another apocalyptic) and surprising, with a component of mysticism, in what less relevant is the earlier and the later, what is really important is the situation, not the facts.Clive Owen is the perfect actor for the role of Theo, which is great, and the performance is necessary. The role of Julianne Moore surprised me (appears as headliners). The side are luxury, but what you can expect if you have in your template to Michael Caine as an old hippie.All this aderezamos it with a good address, makes nearly two hours of film you balls and pass in an instant. The scene of the bus is wonderful.In short, totally recommended, a science fiction, not as science and perhaps not fiction. You love all those who like films of near future, “ without naves ”.And the end, I loved it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/905

Moriarty

The holiday

muchocine

Something good from this tangle of vague attempts to reach our hearts?. Yes. A decent soundtrack, some not clear glimpses out of the script and any game without outline with the subconscious. And that's it.

We, oh surprise, have a navideño-amoroso hybrid and supposedly funny (?). The Holiday (vacation) is a squishy, topical, predictable and surplus production. With all the commas. And most unforgivable of all is that the talent pulled away is hefty. It is better to know it from the beginning, because although their appearance could remind recent successes of the type of Closer or even in another dimension, Love Actually (marketing does wonders), the viewer should be aware that you will not find with anything like that. Even in one-tenth.To begin with, the script lacks novelty (something common, so it might not be so serious). Two girls lovelorn and wanting to get away from its former undesirable partners, one residing in Los Angeles - Cameron Diaz - and the other in a small village near London - Kate Winslet - contact coincidentally (or causally) via the Internet and decide to exchange their homes during the Christmas holidays. Foreshadow you well, I to Boston and you to California, curiously in the Filmography of the Director, in modern plan but without the game of identities. Do without? chicha?, will.In just two weeks given time to overcome the trauma, to know new people and how not, to return to fall in love with. Until the pointer, the poor, manages to be happy. It is the effectiveness of a script by slightly more than two hours has been stretched without mercy. The iteration of the crucial arguments in addition to the history becomes a sort of carousel that never ceases to turn on itself. If the viewer has not heard to the fourth or fifth mention of that, for example, one of the girls was deceived by her boyfriend, it is left to pay attention, at least in the two minute. Somewhat likely thank you, among other things, to the tiresome overacting of all and each of the cast members that, instead get into his role, appear to move by him as if from a transaction is involved. Abundant light interpretation, and although this is not necessarily pejorative, some gags are really completely absurd to the Bridget Jones; absurd and unnecessary. If they had at least taken with an homage? I serious? the unforgettable Classics (telephone misunderstanding), the catastrophe would have never triggered. What waste.Do or everything is perhaps a lack of overall motivation compounded by cruel feelings crossing: seductive guapo - Jude Law - with pretty millionaire and? mona? do sentimental with? clown? Shorty - Black - Jack. Typical. The fact is that these four actors have worked throughout their careers more than acceptable, but certainly did not have a good day when they were shooting The Holiday. A penalty. As it is also the only salvageable plot, with many references to the film, goal with shoehorn. It wasn't difficult, yet endearing Eli Wallach was the most credible.Even we have come to believe the plight of personal law, as also we did, despite everything, with Penépole cross in back, with a daughter, certainly not think yours. The general conclusion is clear: Nancy Meyers didn't know what to do, if a drama, a mess or a pastelada, which it thus mixed everything. Some result, it gives them no, at least now. Something good from this tangle of vague attempts to reach our hearts?. Yes. A decent soundtrack, some not clear glimpses out of the script and any game without outline with the subconscious. And that's it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2118

Bruji

El retorno de los malditos

muchocine

Never were second parts good?. Not so painful.

Never were second parts good?. Not so painful. The new nightmare of Wes Craven - predictable, simple and indigesta - conspicuous by the self-destruction of their dialogues, by the absence of originality and inconsistency in the script, by the inconsistency of their characters. And you make the mistake of doing without the only intelligent elements of the series were not other than dogs.Locate the reader. The return of the damned is the first sequel to the hills have eyes of Alexandre Aja, which, in turn, is a remake of the hills have eyes of Wes Craven, which, to his own, took another sequel, the hills have eyes 2. Too many eyes, so far, totaling four films, three directors and four writers. Come on, the nightmare goes to night terror.Do with the clear influence of the massacre of Texas, in 1977, the Carter family visit some ancient mines of silver in the middle of the desert, to be attacked? it is unknown why - by a repulsivamente repellent things. A wildly original story at that time that, arrival at the moment opportune and censored in several countries, it becomes a cult movie, catapulting to fame to its young director. Eight years later, the survivors of the massacre (the dog and some more) returning to the scene to configure a completely forgettable, improper of the acclaimed master of the horror film. In 2006, Aja, an expert in terrifying remakes? that already prepares for Piranha 1978 - resorted to night of the living dead of 1,968 to explain the repulsivo-repelente phenomenon, and La Noche and La Matanza to realize the presence of the new Carter in New Mexico family. The result satisfies those who are unaware that you it's a remake, the gore soft lovers, to fans of the genre and the critics, which considers it the best film of the year. So far, all happy, nerviosicos perdíos jumping into the seats, screaming with closed eyes and vomiting in the bucket of popcorn.In this way, taking advantage of the good reception of the mutant bugs among new generations of moviegoers, the Craven (father and son) improvise an attractive script for adolescents, which dispenses with the family environment that characterizes the saga and relies on archetypal characters coming out of Scream. Between the clumsy mini platoon of recruits ducks and novices, not miss the boy handsome without brain, Lieutenant Ripley in the Earth, the head of brave Turkish Mission, funny bastard, the friendly goonie and that it is not known what makes in this story. Of course, it would not be a sequel with eyes if not mainstreamed into the cast to the young mother who takes the brunt.Sitting the bases, only there to cause a fire to distract, to try to reach the top of Iwo Jima without Beach and develop an adventure in Fraguel Rock singing the song of the ten Negritos. On this occasion, with nine soldiers who went to explore, one was lost and eight are to remain.Do the "interesting" script, filled with unimaginable bug (remember the timely suicide of the Colonel), gets in the hands of a skilled director at dizzy with the House that AVID of viscera, you forsake the close-ups, los suaves retimes and sound effects for? more than scare - bother. Meanwhile, the torturadora soundtrack not accompanied, but that pursues; the surprise factor is non-existent, the forced touches of humor, ridiculous; and the message issued, americanamente devastating. And it is the largest of the pacifists becomes quarrelsome cruel when the occasion requires. Violence, is (therefore), sometimes justified and they manifest as well.Gone, far behind, was the genius of Wes Craven? director of the last House on the left (based on the spring of the maiden of Bergman), awarded in Sitges, creator of Freddy Krueger - to give way to the orgy of blood and sand that opens the door to all kinds of excursions to the sector 16, Final destination in unwary tourists. The current box-office success you can follow many more hills with eyes to the detriment of the less worthy of quality indication.Definitely, Hollywood is not right to make war on the phantom menace to the already consolidated Japanese horror film. Even with their heaviest artillery.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2959

Rafa Delgado

Death Note

muchocine

It is absolutely disappointing and disheartening a story so interesting and so exquisitely well thought-out as the 'Death Note' be missed the most in its film adaptation.

'Death Note' has been without a doubt the countdown phenomenon that stronger has stuck in the country of the rising sun in recent years. Its original and addictive plot has caught many mangaka throughout all this time. An army of followers has emerged and that has noticed. especially in the portfolio of the creators and editors, seeing the percal, adapted in record time in a fabulous anime manga. But, no doubt, those who were more receptive to that hunger were those of Warner Bros.. Japan, which quickly put the batteries and premiered in 2006, the year 'Death Note' par excellence, two films based on the manga by Takeshi Obata and Tsugumi Ôba. is absolutely disappointing and disheartening that a story so interesting and so exquisitely well thought-out as the 'Death Note' be missed the most in its film adaptation.Directed by Shusuke Kaneko, 'Death Note' has a few characters desdibujados to the core, without any notion of soul and charisma, simple caricatures of what was we presented in the manga or the anime. Mere ghosts wandering, expressionless to say enough is enough (Tatsuya Fujiwara or Asaka Seto reach the Nirvana of the caradeparedismo), who are unable to connect with the spectator at any time. It is terribly sad that transmit thousand times a monigote computer generated as it is the shinigami Ryuuk (which, incidentally, sings La Traviata from Moon.), not their own cast.But that is not the main failure of this film. Really serious is that as adaptation it is really painful. While I watched it, I put in the situation of someone who hasn't heard of 'Death Note' in his life, and I was wondering if it really diagnosed something. It seems that someone you were counting the manga or the anime so very on top, without just going into details that, while they may seem insignificant, are vital.Well, this film lacks the true essence of 'Death Note', and is positioned as a simple complement (and nod to the fans) to the entire universe being built around the phenomenon.The pace of the film, sometimes frantic and sometimes tedious as a day without the internet, does not help.Nevertheless, highlight the work of direction in the final minutes of the film, very correct and vibrant. though arriving late. Also the work done by Ken'ichi Matsuyama as L, the rival of the main character, Yagami Light, who captures with a resounding and rewarding success to the character. And in conclusion, to underline the prologue of the film: with L (for a change), best of all, no doubt.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1747

Pruden Rodríguez

Epic movie

muchocine

Out of the expensive film long, looks askance, remorse and an intense debate about whether or not some "puntazo" that rights worth. I did not see it.

Take time to make this criticism. Moreover, take time to read this criticism, is a great way to waste time. But perhaps a server, resquemoroso, resentful, hurt and somewhat embarrassed, can seek the apology at one of those inherent to the man needs: the share the worst of life with others.Error number one: get carried away. You know, always is the fault of others. That if Scary Movie was not bad, that if I want to laugh a bit, that if there is nothing better to do tonight. I find a thousand excuses, you could even argue that he was drunk (or that he wanted to be, I do not remember well), but the case is that the 6.50? It was worth the entry passed to other hands, perhaps wiser than the mine.Error number two: see it. One enters little waiting. outings. Maybe 3 "extemely"? A couple of gags for the memory? Some of these nonsense over time seem more funny? But nothing at all. The time was passing and I refused to lay me, to stretch your legs and enjoy a good sueñecito (as did fellow from next door). I wanted to endure. Six euros are well worth a little patience. With the expected 3 "extemely" the thing remained in two euros for "point". Today did not go wrong change. However, they did not. Not even a triple on the Horn.It would enter into details, but I would be doing a disservice to whom read me. This time things were going from parody of epic films: Pirates of the Caribbean, Superman, the Chronicles of Narnia, Charlie and the chocolate factory. Four orphans come in Gnarnia and try to defeat the White Witch. By the way go crossing with others (now a pirate, now a magician.) and finally. I don't know, neither remember nor care too much. The worst is not that it lacks argument (no one asked that), what is serious is that not even attempting to parody of such films, ridicule them, find the funny side. It's like a rehash of sequences of one and another, always staying about to make grace. The few moments that deserve a smile are those in which uses the sophisticated resource "give a blow to another", which ultimately is as old as cinema.Add to this discomfort at seeing so much untapped money (not mine, of the budget for the production of both stage and both costumes) and the unfortunate moments videocliperos (got to thinking that any retransmission of MTV had cast) and get a real waste of film. Out of the expensive film long, looks askance, remorse and an intense debate about whether or not some "puntazo" that rights worth. I did not see it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2435

Oscar Cantero

El despertar del amor

muchocine

An attempt of mixing several genres that has become a disaster no feet or head and that he is not sense even though you try to.

With the only reference being a film set in the Austro-Hungarian Empire and in full pre-war era I Sabbath viewing of the awakening of love, a work of the British John Irvin, who many remember for the Fourth Angel or silent when the trumpets.The film tells the story of a female boarding school, away from any population, in which girls are educated rigidly from small for the sole purpose of turning them in ballet dancers.Mixing a large number of parallel stories, playing the dismissal, without clarifying anything at any time and with a lack of narrative amazing resources, the awakening of love is one of those movies that are half way between homosexual claim drama, suspense, historical (pseudo) gender and a host of them, resulting in the end a disconcerting productsomewhat absurd that it does not close any of the stories that opens and ends clarify in any of its aspects.Narrated with a tone that at times is an extreme hardness, unnecessarily lengthens unpleasant scenes, while take away time that could make is to understand something of this nonsense, in that time, the characters or nothing at all, they are able to assemble.Perhaps the only thing salvageable and notable from burning, are interpretations of its protagonists, including Jacqueline Bisset, appearing as head of distribution without being in a disservice to his dilates career management; because the reality is that in a film so, deeper behind included one in the credits, better.Finally, say that the recreation of scenarios is not bad, although excessively grim. A pilonga chestnut bored to the painted.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1503

Dragon negro

El Motorista Fantasma (Ghost Rider)

muchocine

With this Ghost Rider, Johnson makes it clear that, as much as you like superheroes, that does not mean that you know to make good movies about them.

Director Mark Steven Johnson likes making superhero films has been demonstrated, began with Daredevil in the direction, in a film that wasn't no wonder but saved from the burning through a few details. He had no so lucky with his screenplay of Electra and Rob Bowman perpetrated a real hodgepodge of film. Now, with this Ghost Rider, Johnson, who writes and directs, makes it clear that, as much as you like superheroes, that does not mean that you know to make good movies about them.We start with a full script of topics with the typical story of the superhero, as he gets his powers, the story of impossible love, trauma of the protagonist, learning skills, fighting with the bad guys, etc. Okay it is what it is and it cannot be much more, but at least if that can make good fact and provide details, talks and motivations that make the plot flowing, coherent and distinct, which in this case there is, moreover, there are scenes of ridiculous and meaningless, others stuck with shoehorn and some sonrojantes phrases. Then have a Nicolas Cage is as an actor of penalty and get a pathetic performance making palurdo sometimes and ridiculous chulito other. We continue with one of the points that should have been the Fort of the film and not just convincing, are the special effects. The blazing skull should have been more terrifying, dirty and dark, we give more fear in short and seem more real, although it must be admitted that the fire made effect. Then there is a little developed and some spectacular action scenes saving only some scene of the rider on his bike.A shame a character that could have given much game with a different approach, just been wasted in a film with so little substance is expect that not to give the opportunity to Johnson shooting a sequel, that this man is devoted to something else and stop already martirizar with films of superheroes are not equal.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3744

Rafa Ferrer

Matrimonio Compulsivo

muchocine

The Farrelly brothers have entered into a spin, producing year after year a film more cumbersome, less elaborate, and where, despite some excellent first minutes, the thing starts to deflate more and more, until you reach the unexpected.

When I went to see, "Love in game" I realized that the Farrelly brothers had dropped the ready, and that after "Two very stupid fools" and the mega-hit "something happens with Mary" as well as the sympathetic "Love blind" cutrez they had entered into a spin, producing year after year a film more cumbersome, less elaborate, and where, despite some excellent first minutesthe thing starts to deflate more and more, until you reach the unexpected.Is true that Ben Stiller owes much to the Farrelly, thanks to them and to the film that starred with them alongside Cameron Diaz is today one of the stars of the comedy of our days, but both to make fools of ourselves over and over again? (and see that in "Something happens with Mary" it makes baskets). Add Malin Akerman, the incredible father of Stiller, Jerry, apart from Michelle Monaghan, and the final cameo of Eva Longoria, all together, but not scrambled in a tape, which of course I did not like anything, but that nothing, nothing.And where few things are saved from burning, and it is that, the absurd humor of the farrelly makes this time one finished the mosqueado projection, and not wanting to see his next comedy.Go week of bad movies I've been!And van.!PS: Did not know so many sexual positions, I will have to ask the RRMM "Kamasutra" and study it carefully.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3978

Oscar Martínez

Expiación: Más Alla de la Pasión

muchocine

Technically perfect, but totally devoid of soul.

Atonement is the new film by Joe Wright, director of pride and prejudice, and his second collaboration with Keira Knightley. In addition to British actress, the film features cast James McAvoy, Saoirse Ronan, Romola Garai, Vanessa Redgrave, Brenda Blethyn, Juno Temple, Patrick Kennedy and Benedict Cumberbatch.Basada in Ian McEwan's novel, the film begins in England a day of 1935, the hottest of the year. Despite the growing threat of World War II, Briony Tallis and her family live as authentic privileged in his enormous Victorian Gothic mansion. The entire family gathers for the weekend, but the oppressive heat and the emerging repressed emotions create a underground sense of danger. Briony, a writer in the making, is a girl with lots of imagination. A series of catastrophic misunderstandings makes that you accused Robbie Turner, the son of the housekeeper and lover of her sister Cecilia, of a crime he did not commit. The accusation destroys the nascent love between Robbie and Cecilia, in addition to dramatically change the course of their lives.Divided into three segments of irregular length, Atonement has received great praise from international critics, fact that has granted nothing more and nothing less than seven Golden Globe nominations. Unfortunately, at least to me seem, I must say that the new collaboration between director Joe Wright and actress Keira Knightley is not precisely to throw rockets.As I said, the film is divided into three clearly differentiated parts, the first of which is undoubtedly the most precocious and extensive, with an atmosphere truly worthy of mention and a very well-conducted dilated plateamiento, as well as being the only time in which the love affair between the two protagonists, trigger for the coming events, has something of true passion through their veins.After that, Keira Knightley disappears during almost all the rest of the footage, focusing the plot on the wander of James McAvoy Europe besieged by the Third Reich: is in this second part, despite its great setting of a London destroyed by the Blitzkrieg, where the film makes water, diluted in a nonsense which aims to delve into the tyrannical fate suffered by the (the) protagonist (s) due to a child's tantrum. Already in the final leg, the third excerpt puts us at present, where a now elderly Briony Tallis confesses his sins of youth and argues why in his novel, in a somewhat watered-down twist but that manages to wake up the spectator of the tedium of the central section of the film.So, Atonement, which the distributor of turn has added to the bombastic tagline from beyond the passion, it is a great film adaptation, with an atmosphere, clothing and photography worthy of mention, as well as the excellent soundtrack to Dario Marianelli, but whose story is completely alleged passion that should erect as a leitmotif of the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3174

Rafa Ferrer

Concursante

muchocine

It is sad to be poor, but better than rico since then... A tape, which, will join all those that, like "Wall Street" and "Arms of women", will be in economy classes.

Before you begin, a little thinking that I do before starting to reel off the ins and outs of the film, for today, in this world in which we live, of wretched work and expensive mortgages, and as much as we pray and want to put a candle to S.Pancracio, is better to be poor than rich, and is having pasta, such is the development story of the tape that today brings usIt is shit, it is better to be poor and unhappy, that rich and can Feliz? With the flock of vultures there out there, waiting to get you the livers with the best of smiles.Leonardo Sbaraglia, actor who I esteem, interpret here, after an excessive narration (me bored movies where the Narrator has so many things that not little has to guess and delve into the same.), the story of an eccentric Professor of economics that winning a contest wrecks, to not keep the costs of the awards received, we see his metamórfosis (excellent performance), until that gets completely crazy.On the other hand we have a staff of secondary, led by Fernando Cayo (just as bad as in the recent "the orphanage"), Chete Lera, which always makes the same role, or the tiny group of television actors of the day.I do not like his narration, mixing the agenda, trying to toggle between reality and dreams and where one he is a strange face, failing to understand that he is counting at any time of the footage; striking that hardly there are soundtrack, 2 or 3 items and stop you have.Ultimately while waiting and predictable at the outset fails to stir consciences, pity in a movie where one attempts to deepen the dangers of being rich or poor, and must enjoy, as noses, of what one has in hand.A tape, which, will join all those that, like "Wall Street" and "Arms of women", will be in economy classes, more than Keynes for another thing to mention.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/989

Jose Luis

Hijos de los hombres

muchocine

A tape it brings something new to science fiction, proving that not only gender is made to deploy special effects. A work master, futuristic but realistic, painful but very enjoyable.

Visions film about the end of the world there are many and of all kinds, from nuclear disasters, deadly epidemics, even the most improbable as alien invasions and robotic rebellion. But that suggested in children of men, is one of the most realistic and creepy that I've seen in a long time? And if the man is his own executioner? and that perhaps if one day the human species loses the ability to playback? As such the person young man of the world is 18 years old, no more babies or children across the globe and schools are abandoned buildings and thing of the past? If you lived in a world where there is no hope and know that every day you live humanity is dying? Scary isn't it?Much more if we consider that the story takes place in the near future, the 2027, and the world is in crisis with outbreaks of generalized violence; do one day like any other, humanity cries the death of Diego, the world youngest person, Theo (Clive Owen) walking desolate without hope, until his ex-wife gets in touch with him to ask a very important favor: to help you get a permit to transport a young woman into a city in conflict? a young woman who is miraculously pregnant.A script concise, direct, intelligent and brilliant; goes us to this scene of desolation, focusing only on the human point of view, where they are not scientific to explain us reasons women can not pregnant, or tests that they are carried out to resolve the crisis, nor military us explaining that most of the cities of the world are involved in endless conflicts. On the contrary, we see through the eyes of ordinary people, like us, are you not interested in listening to medical explanations, who prefer to evade the issue and try to forget that. An exact script which small doses will revealing us the complete picture that is the world, which gives us a moment of joy before that, with infinite cruelty, we restriegue in the face that this is not a happy film.The picture is borne by Emmanuel Lubezki, one of the most talented Mexicans from the scope of the film, who we have come to beautiful images, this time undertakes to portray the chaos, with the expression of the word, recreated by an excellent production design, masterfully, detailing both the time and the mood of the film; every street is crowded trash, each wall is striped and on the verge of collapse.This year, the three Directors Mexican, best-known worldwide have released one tape, Guillermo del Toro (El Laberinto del Fauno), Guillermo Arriaga (Babel), Alfonso Cuarón (children of men), and on the basis of these three tapes, I can assure you, that the most talented of them all is Cuarón, who with this excellent staging reaffirms as a directorwho alongside the brilliant technical aspects gives your tapes with a deep emotional and thematic. Carrying out this time, tape it brings something new to science fiction, proving that not only gender is made to deploy special effects and that can address such serious issues as the expected loss of humanity, symbolized by the lack of children worldwide.When I was a kid, me ill and I had to inject, my mother approached me a pillow and told me that her it bite very hard to not feel so much pain, there were several moments in this film that I wanted to have a pillow to bite her, as in the pesadillesca and long, long sequence, in which the protagonists have to cross a city in war, in which the camera almost flush with the floor moves, like the characters, hiding where possible, even blood splatters the screen and far from "correct" detail, the drops of blood are there to make us more painful sight.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/155

Ivan Sainz-Pardo

V de Vendetta

muchocine

Poorly lit, without rhythm, pretentious, with a few pathetic dialogues, failed, full of cliches, boring and even shameful in many moments

With both comics fan and both Geek Superhero in the network, I much fear that this criticism I sent to hell for non-moderns and the anti-cools. But friends, I can't help but write that "V for Vendetta" to my seemed "truly a mierdetta" Yes, me I have not read the comic of Allan Moore, I hardly spent the "Mortadelos and filemones", "Spiderman", "Superlopez" and "Jabato", but no matter. I went to the cinema and tried to entertain me without instruction manual.What I found was an uncle pedantic, escaped from gatherings of Garci, disguised as a Fox and a mask. A film pretentious, poorly lit, without rhythm, with a few pathetic dialogues, failed, full of cliches, boring and even shameful in many moments.As action movie, am disappointed. Too little chicha and anything novel. (The lovers of films about authoritarian futures with a good accióncoreografiada "Matrix" style, I recommend "Equilibrium".)As a superhero movie, anda closer "Catwoman", "Daredevil" or "Scooby-Doo", that of "Superman", "Darkman", "The Raven", "Batman" or company. Special effects do not feature at all. The camera work and the Mise en scene is little more than regularcita, flooded flat media and short, with machines of smoke on the side working without rest and offering general whiff to study. As I said before, you cannot find a look original or novel, despite having sent to paint everything what appears in grey and black screen. "Sin City", bet much more boldly, for instance just to the other side.As for the music. buff. even I prefer before the musical call techno of "Blade".The actors, well, inform that Natalie Portman is also very good with such shaved hair and Sidney Oconnor. John Hurt is always very angry and a TV and others, basically, passing out there. The love story is stuck at the end all, of obliquely and is not believe nor the screenwriter, director, nor the Wachowski brothers in the production.History is an assortment of intentions, a pastiche from "beauty and the beast", "The Fox", "the Phantom of the opera", "The fight club", "The count of Monte Cristo", any of the numerous existing and less original on authoritarian future productions, and "Bamby". Come on, silly.Everything is predictable, languid and almibarado. Everything is so incredibly absurd, so unlikely and so inexpensive boring, some scenes are up comic without trying it. As the shameful escenita hesprecióoooon and all those other numerous flashbacks which catapulted us shame others, without any mercy, levels in which we discovered, suddenly, in the film pressing strong, very strong teeth. And where on top, so they give us everything ridiculously masticadito. Or as all those scenes where the visual prima always on common sense and reason, and where Moreover, if it cannot explain already nothing else then because not matter.Moments such as where there is to believe so, without more, that that gentleman, disguised by obligation, and in search and capture in a militaristic, dictatorial and police state, manages to manufacture 300,000 masks and layers, and, in addition, send also to each particular House, every Office and den of England alone, without removing the mask and without that caught it. Or having to watch as our fellow countryman entertains forming a figurine that draws its logo V-shaped with the help of 10,000 piececitas of Domino (that told them), to only then topple remain alone, in the best style "dominoday", and for his unique jamaipanese enjoyment. And so everything, one after another, gentlemen. And Yes, already is that black guy is supposedly a hero, and there is always a certain amount of fantasmada in these films, but here, many times these acts have also a weight specific to the central plot. It causes neither more nor less than a revolution, and I only would like to sell me the move more intelligently and Curran. (As in the "Club de Lucha", since you mentioned it before) But no, here there are only unexplained attacks without dead, in the style of precious Fireworks illuminating the balconies and under the music of Tchaikovsky. Just have at our disposal a cúmulode images and inconsistent actions and tramas fotocopiadas.¿Y as sold all this then? Well, because we add an attack in London and to be precisely on the subway, then talk a little pseudo-philosophically on the symbolism of overthrow representative buildings, four phrases more supposedly witty and style "the ideals are bulletproof," a little obliquely and another little bit of germ warfare, avian flu and then already everything is supposedly fashionable and also, we have to favour all a mass of incrédulosque believe and will defend this project as a modern, bold and innovative. In short, a complete disappointment of film. No wonder nothing to the two brothers of Matrix have decided, at the last minute, spongers is better his second Assistant. Can anything be done even worse than the aftermath of Matrix? Yes, friends, you can. Of course you can.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/67

Guille

Brokeback mountain

muchocine

Love, what is love, there is no vestige

I reaffirm my comments that I made in my blog about this film. On what is love, I saw nothing more than looks and sensations that lead the romantic vehicle along the routes of the passion. Passion and desire are components of love but just alone are not the love.The master Ang Lee, director of the film, wanted to pay tribute to nature traditional history in a bucolic environment full of stunning scenery. The intimate music for guitar and folk-country meet its task to move the Viewer on the other side of the screen.However this does not help turn Brokeback Mountain, a love story. Love is not a force of nature: the story of the relationship between Ennis Del Mar and Jack Twist proposed as the backbone of the argument does not evidence any sign of love.If we follow chronologically the story of friendship of the two cowboys, we firstly, that gets a normal coexistence between co-workers to a meeting without that mediate a process of conversations or emotional approaches to prepare what is supposed to be that it will be a love affair. We do not know what is falling in love, but a mutual attraction. Once already "known", each married a good woman that founded separate families. In those years he was not well regarded to be gay, but it was not compulsory to marry; they could you have followed singles, and maintain a great freedom to organize its meeting calendar. Repressive society forced them to marry? Since the first villain in the history of the western (1903) to Clint Eastwood, killer desperate in "The unforgivable" (1992), matrimoniar it or get a girl was not an imperative, even customary for the western legends.The thing is that marriage and family, and keeping sexual relations with their wives, each "x" months under the guise family are still seeing that will hunt.What most caught my attention is that in all that time none of the Cowboys never shows the slightest interest in the life of one on his wife, children. throughout the existence of the "beloved" is like a negligible break between each encounter that is sexual hinted from each approach that does not have an interpersonal Exchange which tell us that you there is something more than "caresses". Looks brilliantly performed by the actors are not telepathic conversation.The Cowboys want to be alone, without that none of the actual circumstances of the personal environment of each might affect those encounters so idyllic nevertheless evasion. In fact, things degrade when Ennis has to deal with his daughter when his wife leaves him. Jack refuses to his friend fulfills its obligations of father and "break". In addition, when Jack passes time without seeing Ennis makes his encounters with another subject. In short, there is sexual attraction and passion. The dramatic action of the play is the fight against wind and tide to move the relationship, which would be the romantic. But love, what is love that well could "seek the happiness of being loved", there is no vestige.Although interpretations of Heath Ledger and j. Gyllenhaal are excellent, the packaging is too caramel to be credible. Especially humiliating is the treatment of his wives, specifically soul, victims of a double life full of lies and contempt for their own family. In my opinion what truly subverts in this film is not the fascist genre of westerns, but what is the love of couple and family (the black beast of sesentaiocheros liberation movements).Finally, being indulgent with my own aesthetic enjoyment, this story is a romance with little love, much of telenovelesco (where the beauty of the heroines and the heroínos aim to justify any inconsistency) and that it smells too cazapremios. I do not mean to offend my gay friends, but I do not think that this film should become its paradigm of love story. So I still prefer Sunday Bloody Sunday (1971) by Schlesinger.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1128

Bloody Will

Banderas de nuestros padres

muchocine

The film is designed to become a classic, while I doubt if this will be the part of the duo Iwo Jima it is most remarkable memory.

Increasingly more and more we expect from Mr. Clint Eastwood. Who we were going to say that that dirty Harry would become everything a landmark film in the 21st century. Pointing ways, back in 92 with the multioscarizada "Without pardon", Eastwood has managed to give his career a crescendo effect, with peak in "Million Dollar Baby", and culminating in the ambitious project of Iwo Jima to date: "Flags of our fathers", which lands first, and the next "Letters from Iwo Jima" which will come later.After brush these records go to the point: "Flags" is designed to become a classic, while I doubt if this will be the part of the duo Iwo Jima it is most remarkable memory. From the first frame up the last Eastwood looks the most moving war film of recent years, and this not be war, but by having the most petty of the Yankees feeling to battle the 2nd World War: the need for heroes at all costs. As a result, a patriotic film, with a portion of the history of America that is not is if everyone will be interested.Really, when I began to see the film didn't know exactly what I would be the director, if be scenes of fighting cruel style of "Saving private Ryan", or the scars of war in unfortunate beings as "The Hunter". Both schemes are interwoven in "Flags", and I have to say that it does in a masterful way. Flashbacks, a story-teller, phony interviews, all which allow Eastwood to move of forward towards back and vice versa, to finally complete the story in a way perfect. "Flags of our fathers" tells the story of the six men who, on the Hill of Iwo Jima, in the heat of the 2nd World War, placed the American being immortalized flag of for life. Conviritiéndose photography in an icon of war, 4 of them will return to the United States for a promotional tour in search of funding for the war. The memories of fallen comrades, and the difficulty of erecting in "famous" for nothing will change the course of their lives.I must confess that I was surprised pleasantly to find me in the middle of the plot with a so fierce critique of American society that raises to the heavens to people that really does nothing. It does not mean that the six men who flew the flag were on vacation, but that really was placed in battle, nor were killed while put, or anything like risk, something that, disregarding completely the American history, made me special grace.Thus, my favorite scenes are the three soldiers doing everything a "tour" show to get people to buy war bonds. The relationship so cold that it unites them, despite having shared dead in combat, and John Slattery, the figure of the "manager", ruthless, selfish and all an execrable individual, gives a dimension to the film that makes the soldiers little known, without to lose at the same time the most emotional of his weakness, side very difficult to accomplish when it is assumed that there must be more violence of medio.¿Todo is so good?, then not. Although together the entire fabric is perfectly embedded, interpretations fail to the quality of the script. On the basis that, from the beginning, I find it hard to distinguish Hank of Harlon, Doc and no-be-who-more with both hull up to eyebrows, Ryan Phillipe is too stiff, Paul Walker we hardly distinguished, Jamie Bell has little screen time and who has more dramatic weight in the film, the Indian Adam Beach, no outboard precisely. On the other hand the footage again, is excessive for what counts. They are 2 hours and 15 minutes, and vale that "Pirates 2 lasts longer, but who said that" Pirates 2 was short. "" As always, it's best to launch a film with intentions of Oscar with a worthy of Oscar footage. However at times the action relantiza unnecessarily.Those who go looking for a war without mercy movie are going to leave the room very disappointed. Perhaps there lie its failure at the box office. The public believed that he saw viscera and blood, and Eastwood in fact shows much more heart.What does I'm sure is, which a precedent like this, "Letters form Iwo Jima" it will be excellent, because Eastwood turn away from so much flag and patriotic sentiment to focus on the Japanese vision of the conflict, and that, in the hands of this director is something I don't want to lose me.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/446

Kiko de España

Las colinas tienen ojos

muchocine

Thrills, surprises, (much) gore (but much much) and, especially in the final stretch, cutting that will always more and leadership that lapses not a single second.

Ovation (more than one) in the room for the new point of French that will save the genre. With "High voltage" single was warm, who was going to say, right? AJA has won in narrative, getting an hour of footage in which load tension with an inhuman atmosphere making putting full Viewer in the plot for a second part b-r-u-t-a-l which, literally, there is no puppet head.A (wonderful) thing is happening in the genus, especially with the remakes. In recent years we have seen a facelift face rather than correct abodes of fear, notable Texan and outstanding resurrections of dead killings. The hills have eyes 2006 enters into the latter category. An overwhelming prologue which seems to take place on a reddish planet and appropriations that scary give the kick-off of a movie that can be enjoyed in crescendo and in which Mr. Nicotero leaves his signature every five minutes.Thrills, surprises, (much) gore (but much much) and, especially in the final stretch, cutting that will always more and leadership that lapses not a single second. Mention apart for the prodigious Tomandandy soundtrack and the arid photography Maxime Alexandre. Curious name, serves to define the film, "Maximum Alexandre". 9.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2362

Oscar Cantero

La condesa rusa

muchocine

A movie in which the lack of rhythm and feeling bedevil a good script and a unique historic atmosphere.

They tend to fascinate a priori the films which are set in other times and places with environments and very different to the usual European and American environments. The charm and the capacity of seduction of Asian countries, with their decadent appearance from the beginning of the last century, is undeniable, but always attempt this does not prevent me to comment on the film with equanimity and justice due to any critical judgement.The Russian Countess is a production that brings together the features previously mentioned, which is compounded by the presence of a Ralph Fiennes always correct, and to a lesser extent that of Natasha Richardson, being merely anecdotal and irrelevant of Vanessa Redgrave.La film chronicles the experiences of an American diplomat blinded by an accident, and that manages to fulfill his dream of opening a nightclubat the head of which he placed to a former Russian Countess exercising prostitution after leaving so idealized exiled by the Bolshevik revolution that Russia have some and that so many lives cut short.The good atmosphere and a dash more or less interesting, not enough however to achieve a rounded product, because the lack of pace and ability to connect with the spectator are barriers clearly attributable to a James Ivory that usually suffer from a lack of feeling. Although it is difficult, there is a compromise between the coldness and the sentimentality, and there is where the capacity of the director should weigh more to achieve it.From the technical point of view, it is more than correct. Without fanfare, but correct.In any case, is a film entertaining, well finished, that this lack of feeling and rhythm depriving themselves of a better rating, but it used to have more or less fun.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/494

Bloody Will

Mi super ex novia

muchocine

He could have stayed even as a film of infantil-familiar Court, but the sex scene wild revientamuros become prohibitive and uncomfortable for children.

If the director Ivan Reitman tried to become funny the phenomenon of superheroes on screen, we could say that it has not come to pass. "Ghostbusters" and "Kindergarten COP" gave him success. With "Junior" or "Evolution" it proved the bitterness of the box office failure and with it, as well I reported last week, it has been found with the thud of the year.It is not for less. This crossing of "Superman" with "Fatal attraction" is predictable from start to finish, and could not assure you that you are going to laugh at not being able, because this comedy is so easy to digest and forget. Reitman attends what more result you gave with "Ghostbusters": comedy with special effects, however lacks something basic: actors and history that carry it forward.The way in which Matt (Luke Wilson) and G-Girl (Uma Thurman) are known has no feet or head, is rather absurd. As their relationship develops it is even more absurd, and really the Thurman not becomes crazy unless they cut with it, so the reason to break the boy's are really pathetic. Finally, all forced to reach that hopes to the Viewer: a jealous and spiteful superheroine with a simple mortal, which moreover Pyrrha by another (Anna Faris).A from there perhaps starts the most interesting and funny to say the least, of the film, but ends up diluting in something more convoluted with a lex luthor of all one hundred and even more, a fitting end for a Superman of all one hundred.Uma Thurman was the only one who could save this film. Draws a new Glenn Close with that nasty giving who has been musa Tarantino. But of course, if you put it to Luke Wilson, which has the same expressive collection of vases of Planeta DeAgostini, nothing can be done. This actor is horrible in every film that participates, and begins to be a cheap solution when you can not hire Owen Wilson. Anna Faris is your online: flat encephalogram.What you want I say more, this is not "Alatriste" or "Memento". It could have stayed even as a movie infantil-familiar Court, but the sex scene wild revientamuros become prohibitive and uncomfortable for the menores.¿Es to recommend?, well, as they used to say in a comment of "Alatriste", in the film is cool, there are popcorn, and for whom it is autonomous will make you to forget the day October 20 must be palmar VAT. If you go with the idea of paying off the ticket price, I assure you that in two months will be in your cashier of DVDs for rent.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1557

Rafa Ferrer

Ant bully

muchocine

Tape quite achieved animation which will bring a dose of tolerance to the kids of the thing, with a story that could have given more if, but that entertains.

This is a tape that had to have gone to see in press pass, just have been my "baptism of fire" in the film premieres, however, a family problem that not worth noting, prevented me from seeing her at the time, and taking advantage of already on DVD today now, I've taken a ratillo to do so.The film that brings us is a prodigy of animation, well looked in some way to the already legendary "Antz" (Antz), recalls more than anything by the design of the characters; these ants that more resemble crabs than to those summer animals that eat us the omelette when we picnic snack.One of the things more complicated to do in animation (say it experts not me), is water, in this movie the feeling of the liquid element is very successful, and in the scenes where this is leading, the sense of reality is amazing.Lately I am fairly disillusioned with the dubbing, which has imposed fashion that "good turn" are those who put the voices to the characters, not like in the USA, where, for example, Nicolas Cage, Julia Roberts, or Meryl Streep, were responsible for putting voices in this film; Spain have been Carmen Maura and Anabel Alonso (which already has experience with the "Buscando a Nemo" Dory) charge to voice 2 of the protagonists, and I break a lance for the 2, since they do it really well, and it is not difficult to forget that they appear on screen.There are 2 things that I liked the film, and it is that, although the idea of the plot is promising, the characters and the story are too seen, see, I mean, the story is good, and helps children to be tolerant with others and with the environment, that given the current situation, need, but, the characters are too linear, bad very bad, very good good. Is true that we cannot ask a Shakespearean drama, a child tape but.In short, that I get more we: A tape of quite achieved animation that will bring a dose of tolerance to the kids of the thing, with a story that could have given more if, but that entertains.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1003

Dragon negro

Arthur y los Minimoys

muchocine

Luc Besson can handle the action, and here proves again the film while maintaining a hectic pace without hardly rest.

Luc Besson directs this film based on his own books in what he says will be his last foray into film as director, although some rumors suggest it could return to after the cameras to direct its sequel. It tells us this film the story of Arthur, a boy who lives with his grandmother in a House away from the people whose parents have it rather abandoned and their only consolation is live fantasies thanks to the books of travel and inventions of his grandfather by Africa. But the tranquility will be threatened when she discovers that due to the debts of the grandmother to maintain the House they will be evicted within forty-eight hours. Arthur will put all his efforts in search of a treasure hidden by his grandfather, but doing so will have to travel to the tiny world of the Minimoys.La film blend live action with action in the form of drawings by computer totally coherently and perfectly complemented the one on the other. And it is precisely in is last where it generates all the more thrilling action and where Arthur will live great adventures, with an animation achieved every detail and a character design really achieved, you can see hair and freckles very well profiled in the face of the protagonists and the Princess is really beautiful, one of the most beautiful women's faces seen in animation.Luc Besson can handle the action, and here proves again the film while maintaining a hectic pace without hardly rest. At most we can blame you some slippage of script, especially that of the rope of the knife that fairly sings, but generally maintains a good level.Despite being directed to a child audience, Arthur and the Minimoys is perfectly enjoyable for all ages and is without doubt one of the film's animation of the year along with Monster House and Cars, failing even to see Happy Feet.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2165

Patri

María Antonieta

muchocine

Great moments as the dinner of the Kings with the noise of the crowd of Fund are overshadowed by the rest of the film, which at the end leaves the feeling of that could have been much better.

The third film by Sofia Coppola is a film very irregular, alternating scenes of one great movie with others that are really painful, in part due to the music. In this film the music is something that cannot be avoided because it draws attention to the use made of it at certain times, a modern music in a film set in the 18th century is a risky bet, and at times the result is good, but the rest of the film, the music thumping andcommonly, said "not paste or glue".It is clear that Sofia is a Director brave and special, as he was already evident in Lost In Translation and the Virgin suicides, not intended to stay in the conventional forms of cinema, but that he likes to experiment, and print their own style in his films, something that makes you earn points as a filmmaker, although it sometimes risk both the result leaves much to be desired. Great moments as the dinner of the Kings with the noise of the crowd of Fund are overshadowed by the rest of the film, which at the end leaves the feeling that it could have been much better, although it is right to reflect the type of life of pre-revolutionary French monarchy, with its luxury and ostentation while people are dying of hunger. The viewer understands and it identifies with the situation of the young Queen, I did not know another kind of life and perhaps time was not aware that there was an entire people that did not have what to eat, something that has some parallels with the current situation in the world, where the first world people live full of luxuries and comforts while millions of people are dying of hunger unless we do nothing to remedy it outside the Palace.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/485

Kiko de España

La máquina de bailar

muchocine

The best safe since the day of the beast (or the first stream) and Jose Corbacho which is a child of the great whore and passes it big.

Ten years ago, the Farrelly brothers signed, always under my humble opinion, his magnum opus: go couple of idiots (Kingpin) now, a decade later, Óscar Aibar, director of the comiquera (ydifícil) quagmire and the wonderful flying saucers, pays tribute to the American piece with this covert remake which is the fun (but a tad long, almost two hours) the machine dancing.Let's say that the production of buddy Segura what to Kingpin wasps nest was the assault on Precinct 13. And it works because it has a photograph an excellent cast, with this great actor Jordi Vilches, the best safe since the day of the beast (or the first stream) and Jose Corbacho, which is a child of the great whore and passes it big and overwhelming (in charge of Teo Delgado).I am surprised in a positive way the Americanization of this type of comedy, ranging from the aforementioned brothers Farrelly to the most recent Dodgeball or the benchwarmers, passing through tributes to Karate Kid, Gremlins, or even lifetime (crappy) Delta Force type action cinema (or Sudden death), these hand in hand with the always fun Enrique Villén. And the eye of the Tiger, of course.Surprise Bárbara Muñoz, completely credible in the role of megapija Raritan. Nacho Vigalondo has a funny cameo without being a movie cameos. Come on, isn't a Wilder but you throw a few laughs.A 6´5. PS: Living the philosophy of cheap movies.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/836

Tito Chinchan

Nicky, la aprendiz de bruja

muchocine

The script is quite childish, what does not mean that her they can see adults. The animations are still very good, and the curious characters.

I can only learn me already the name of Miyazaki, given that I've seen many of his films and I liked all. This type makes a film of which I alucinan, committed, perfect pictures and wonderful scripts. Not be that it happens to me lately, I think my Paraguayan media has changed me the deodorant or something, but I am a wobbly I cannot.The film is about Nicky, a small witch who, according to tradition, leaving her parents at age 13. Grab your cat Yiyi, the old broom from her mother, and part to another town to continue his studies of witchcraft. After a series of adventures, it ends in a large coastal city, which will cost you adapt a little.Nicky comes from an idyllic world, where all are respected and want to. His arrival in the big city is a critique of modern society, in which prevails the trampling on others. Not that it is a movie highly critical, but Miyazaki always leaves his strokes of moralizing, which never wrong. The script is quite childish, what does not mean that her they can see adults. The animations are still very good, and the curious characters. Yiyi cat, which is funny monda deserves special mention (my God, that expressions say, saquenme this ñoñismo). The only that I put to the film is the end, is that suddenly the artists ran the pencil and the director said "already I don't buy more, until where we arrived". If not, I fail.In short, a delightful recording that satisfacirá (encandilará) to the adults stayed in Heidi. Adolescents will seem a FAG (with forgiveness) and the kids will love. You decide.kisses.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/992

Rafa Ferrer

Volver

muchocine

Great movie, good work of Pedro Almodovar. I would especially highlight with Pé, (extremely attractive in this film), the role of Carmen Maura and is that from beginning to end, he manages to get the meat of chicken, also Blanca Portillo.

I must admit that Almodovar is not of my devotion and that except for "Talk to her" most of the films of the manchego director seem "supinos conaza" (almost always) cut in the same pattern, and where the intensity and narrative rhythm just being always the same dramatic elevations which by H or (b) appeal to the same in each of the samples of his cinematography; However, and as has already happened with the penultimate film of Peeeedroooo, (as said Pé, which in this film becomes her actress fetíche), has bedeviled me from beginning to end, and is that many are the years of my childhood which I spent in summer at home of my grandmother (in a village in Toledo) and where customsmodus operandi, and strange female behaviors, so well know translate Almodovar in this, his latest film.It could start to desvaratar in one thousand and one stories, things that happen in some scenes of the film and which remind me of "my people", but no, I will not do, I note only those "machine gun kisses" which gives the character of Blanca Portillo to all that is close and I well remember my aunts and my grandmother.I would especially highlight with Pé, (extremely attractive in this film), the role of Carmen Maura is that from beginning to end, it manages to get the meat of chicken, also Blanca Portillo, perhaps the more "catheter" of women onscreen, and is that "you think" perfectly his role, Lola Dueñas (which already sensed a bright future in "Mar Adentro" of Amenabar) also do wellThis aunt clueless and curious that there are in all family, Johana Cobo quite normalita, the truth, perhaps in a few years and based on roles to be the creature matures cinematically.In end, great movie, good work of Pedro Almodovar and enormous envy gives me in viewing see return to Carmen as a mother, that would I that back mine suddenly home!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/749

Rafa Ferrer

Saw 3

muchocine

Little, to say nothing has to contribute to the genre, a simple bluff fledged.

"Saw" thought me one of the best films of horror and intrigue of last winter, after its success in the U.S. (funny surprise for a product intended for video which premiered by chance and that has filled the coffers of the independent production company "Lions Gate"), logically came the sequel and now his third (and soon his fourth), far worse than the original tapewhere the first half an hour, with an opening of film that recalls the original stresses and where one prepares for another good recital of "bait". Perhaps the drawback that I see in this third part, is that you one, after the start prepares for a resolution again at the height of the first, and in this, with a fairly obvious simplicity leaves us with the long teeth (Yes, there will be a fourth part) waiting for that in the next tape we it have something else, because in this after much lightheaded Partridge, little, to say nothing, we return to count. Tramposilla (as it can not be otherwise) with a narrative structure divided into two simple scenarios, and a roster of actors productions of a pair of $, finally, that the fans of the first will enjoy again with the adventures of Jigsaw, but little to say nothing has to contribute to the genre, a simple bluff fledged. That if, have managed to not look the suckling pig roasted with equal desire than before with a couple of images and a couple of noises.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2931

Rafa Delgado

Sigo como Dios

muchocine

A tontorrón festival of topical familioedulcorados that adds absolutely nothing to the adult world, but who enjoy Yes or Yes children.

In summer of 2003 was released throughout the world like God (or Bruce Almighty, which is as it would have to be called if the Lords that "translate" the titles had deigned to respect the original title), a film directed by Tom Shadyac (director of authentic pastries as a compulsive liar, Patch Adams, or Dragonfly: the shadow of the dragonfly, but also of genius as Ace Ventura)(: Pet detective), which starred Jim Carrey, Jennifer Aniston and Morgan Freeman doing himself. I.e. Dios.La film had its successful comic points, and was funny despite the cloying Catholic aura that wrapped around, but was literally to hell to become half the typical and unbearable comedy romantic desktop, predictable to say enough is enough.Since God was a success, and quickly confirmed the sequel, but there were difficulties with the cast, since Jim Carrey could not repeat because he was busy with other projects (which were then canceled.) and, if there was no Jim Carrey, obviously (and fortunately) there would be Jennifer Aniston, no continuation of the plot established in like God. So Tom Shadyac came up with the idea of exploiting a character which, a priori, seemed interesting, and was pulled out of the sleeve a story around it. It was nothing more and nothing less than Evan Baxter, in like God gave life now known Steve Carrell.En Sigo as God (or Evan Almighty. continue with titles invented.), Evan Baxter has just been elected nothing more and nothing less than Congressman and moves of Buffalo with his family, to live in a residential area of Northern Virginia. Once there, his life suffers a major turnaround when Dios (Morgan Freeman, how not) orders him to build an Ark, because the flood is coming.The result ends up being little more than disheartening. The tape is boring and makes rather little grace. 95% Of gags and jokes or humorous situations, are children's and clear of facile (to Carrell makes you want to kill him when he does that "do the dance"). And to make matters worse, it happens something more serious than its predecessor: it becomes a typical and repelentemente family comedy easy moralina, and to political and ecological. In addition, the history is absurd nonsense: God announces a deluge, and assigned to Evan Baxter to build an Ark, while a couple of copies of each species are arriving to the place where it will build the piece of pot. At the end (and eye because this can be considered SPOILER), the flood does not exist as such, and one jeto checkered is left to wonder what's the fuss for absolutely nothing.A tontorrón festival of topical familioedulcorados that adds absolutely nothing to the adult world, but who enjoy Yes or Yes children. A pure and simple crossover between as God, Vaya Santa Claus!, and an inconvenient truth.The only thing salvageable from my point of view, the Visual effects (which, although they sing occasionally with the bugs, the Tutuki Splash part seems quite successful) y. credits end, friendly and fun.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1211

Elena Suárez

Atrapa el fuego

muchocine

Misuse of time in the narrative, as well as the provision of information unnecessary and heavy, becomes a real folletín a quasi-interesting biography.

Many of the mistakes that we see today in film, have a common denominator: the false account that a good content is enough, forgetting something that can even be more interesting: a care and attractive continent. Because Lords if I choose between a ready man, and one that in addition to being intelligent has the appearance of Eric Bana, because so we are going to cheat, it will be that the I prefer the second.Jokes aside, when a viewer goes to the movies not only wants a story attractive you for whatever reason but that, in addition, want to be her know count (do not forget that even the best joke can be marred by a bland Muttley). This foreword is irrelevant to talk about the film "Catch the fire", which relates us the hardships that anyone can suffer in a dictatorial State, in this case, it's a humble black workers during apartheid. Patrick Chamusso, our protagonist, is not the result of fiction, but that the film is based on the real life of this South African who became a hero after his entry into the African National Congress (then resistance movement, now party political).So far, the thing might seem interesting, however, misuse of time in the narrative, as well as the provision of information unnecessary and heavy, becomes a quasi-interesting biography a real folletín with certain aftertaste to SOAP. To begin with, too much too much material which teaches us that Patrick was a beautiful person, with half of images would have believed me it. As much images of tortured to spare and in which not is informs us of his time locked (does a day, a week, a month?) On the other hand, only have material on income of Patrick in the ANC (and this is not an aspect as to sum it up in any military ditty). In short, too melodramatic accent and little order in the narrative structure. And I record I have not spoken on the photographs of the end credits (the actor and the real character in a hug?) (No comments).As for the actors, highlights the emergence of one of the illuminated ones of this century (and see that there are few: Bono, Susan Sarandon, Angelina Jolie, Pilar Bardem, Joaquín Sabina). We talk about the thinking good Tim Robbins, a character that has made history in the last celebration of international solidarity Madrid Film Festival with phrases as deep as "my intention was to support the festival, not leave in photos with right-wing politicians". "I feel that I have used." With barbaric acts like this, about the words. Incidentally, Mr. Robbins when you come to my country to speak on matters of policy should be documented a little more, especially if you are going to talk about a subject as sensitive as terrorism. Finally, how I love these self-appointed enlightened on the left that clean ass with tissue paper!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1362

Yojimbo

Coach Carter

muchocine

It is certainly not a movie for personal use. And if not, how can we explain that an American movie ends up with a defeat of the protagonists? in extremis?

Based on facts (although sometimes little credible). Coach Carter is the story of Ken Carter, a player and coach of renown that happens to teach to a disastrous basketball team. And when there is chaos there to put a little order, the character of Samuel l. Jackson imposes it by establishing respect and discipline. And the first point that distinguishes this film is funny its initiative: by signing a contract to train them. A contract in which undertake to logical and understandable basic rules: get minimum notes, attend classes and sit in the first ranks wear a tie. This last point can already be the perfect excuse for some mendrugo to qualify for "facha". Well mendrugo, I recommend that you keep not reading, you shalt enfermito: P funny Lo of the film is that the inevitable but necessary "self-improvement" history is not with too much Manichaeism. It does not carry situations extreme where many viewers we miss the hands to the head or rebufamos of disbelief and boredom by knowing in advance what will happen. This film is a tad different.Despite multiple claims racial (and racist) in some cases, be welcomed personal progression of the team and some of its players, their "tripping" with the early successes and the consequences entailed by see you get something.But basketball is not the subject of the film, but the personal fulfillment. It is not about winning, as well confused the coach at one point in the film, but earn merits to improve our lives and have more opportunities. It is clear that the setting can remain a little distant, but is can draw good lessons from this story. While there he portrayed a horrific education when in slums a high percentage of youth ends in jail or dead, merely arise not to follow a life which is practically already given is a challenge. And a challenge for many other people who may be in the same situation but not in the same circumstances.It is certainly not a movie for personal use. And if not, how can we explain that an American movie ends up with a defeat of the protagonists "in extremis"? Normally it is upside down? is not it?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1300

Matías Cobo

Banderas de nuestros padres

muchocine

The main problem with the film, and that lastra to the dessert, is little harmony on the pace of the story because of a poorly structured temporary jumps.

Flags of our fathers is not the new instant classic of Eastwood which many had hoped. Offers moments isolated magnificent film, war scenes as spectacular as raw (the footsteps of Spielberg is perceptible in them), an elegant photograph of shadows to Million Dollar Baby style and sound accompaniment of the parsimonious notes of the own Eastwood. But the film as a whole does not offer as many good movies as the quoted work or the Mystic River excellent carats. The possibility of a rapid recovery should be at least even through letters from Iwo Jima, a proposal of starting more original to take the unusual point of view of the American war contender.The tape assumes a fairly conventional narrative pattern: the son of one of the soldiers who posed for the famous photo of Joe Rosenthal crawls the role played by his father and his companions in the war of the Pacific and, in particular, after the historical snapshot. In his research for his book discover the bleak truth buried by time and the silence of the protagonists of the facts. And you ascertain how this photo was turned into a banner by the military establishments in order to raise funds for a war that was leaving exhausted the national coffers. Also see how the image of three soldiers reluctantly in the case of two of them, was used for a mammoth marketing campaign war in which there were no objections to lie, exaggerate and, above all, disrespect the memory of comrades fallen in combat.Thus the tape offers a critical discourse in the revision of the promotional campaign, but, above all, intended to pay homage to those who fought in that Sangria which was the island of Iwo Jima campaign. So the sparkling images of the soldiers converted to rock stars during his pilgrimage across the country have a dark and bloody underside: of countless casualties of beardless unable to overwhelm the Japanese soldiers. The main problem with the film, and that lastra to the dessert, is little harmony on the pace of the story because of a poorly structured temporary jumps. Thus, when the film delves into the drama of the triumphal return of the three soldiers, we return suddenly to the horror of the war that's when in when they supervenes them to each of them. And these two temporal dimensions, in addition, adds a third: that of the present tense with the son of the soldier 'Doc' Bradley (Ryan Phillippe) interviewing war veterans for his book. Therefore, although it does turn out to be interesting, the penultimate proposal of Eastwood (of greater budget of his career as director) isn't blessed by his mastery of recent times. Perhaps letters from Iwo Jima (nominated for the Academy Award for best film) to return the best version of the director of San Francisco.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2689

Tito Chinchan

Cuando ruge la marabunta

muchocine

Classic mistreated by the passage of the years on a legion of ants that wipe out a plot of South America. Becomes something heavy around the middle of the film, with unlikely situations and dialogues have been very outdated. But no one can remove the vitola of classic.

Many times we are very permissive with films that have a certain number of years, with the treacly textures or impossible costumes. If these films were made in our time, the critical abalanzaría on them as hyenas in a television documentary. Even so, they retain this stale charm that has made classics. If not, tell me you, what was to be a classic film of ants that shows at times the same level of ants by attacking, or it spends more than one hour until referred to rush. This is cinema.The film is about a white woman who travels to South America to inform her husband, since he had married by proxy. Her ideal death, arrives to meet with a powerful landowner who has stolen the River hectares of land to cultivate cocoa. But the meeting is not entirely satisfactory, inexplicably, given that rather than kill as they kill cockroaches, they enzarzan in discussions about the honour and not be more. It was already the end of the film, the largest force known by those lands, rush, begins to get closer to their crops.My mother-in-law, that film bonanza. When I said see the ants, I remembered vaguely two things, I spent when the ants build rafts with leaves to cross the river and tension which was in black and white. Nothing else see that it was in Technicolor was afraid that the tension was not the same. And, indeed, nothing to do. The tráfago over the years has given on all sides to this movie turned into classic. To begin with, is not understood as a type in the jungle for years not abalance on his wife and does not leave the room until that ants are nibbling the faucets. I understand that special effects are crappy and I do not go for anything with them. That Yes, to draw eight times the same plane, at various points in the film is a bit of nose.In short, classic mistreated by the passage of the years on a legion of ants that wipe out a plot of South America. Becomes something heavy around the middle of the film, with unlikely situations and dialogues have been very outdated. But no one can remove the vitola of classic.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3245

Francisco Bellón

Quiéreme

muchocine

Love me is a totally recommended film for lovers of sentimentaloide melodrama, that they will enjoy and cry in equal parts.

Although it sounds like a cliché, in many cases the reality outperforms the fiction. And for which does not create it, there are plenty of examples, one that most caught attention was the US Government hired Hollywood writers to make write them fantastic attacks and to prepare for them.But not always there to go far to find an example, and what happened to the girl by Cristina Valdivieso, protagonist of love me, is good proof of this. The film tells the story of Pancho (Darío Grandinetti), a cincuentón that meets a girl, her granddaughter (Cristina Valdivieso), when her mother, Lucia (Kira Miró), sends his father victim of despair. Pancho seek his daughter and trying to help her, and at the same time do the same with her granddaughter. Love me is a story of characters, feelings, emotions, which tends to soft and free melodrama with great ease. Beda Docampo Feijóo has failed to establish the boundaries between sincere emotion and the cheap pasteleo that just making your tape. Furthermore, the script is somewhat weak and little credibility, and has some details that border ludicrous (in the pejorative sense), as the dialogue between the characters of Luis Brandoni and Dario Grandinetti. Precisely, the work of Argentine actor is most notable throughout the film, but also deserves mention an emaciated Ariadna Gil. love me is a totally recommended film for lovers of sentimentaloide melodrama, that they will enjoy and cry in equal parts. The rest of viewers, better abstain, except for those who want to see Ariadna Gil emulating Rita Hayworth in Gilda.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/797

Jose Contreras

Borat

muchocine

Maybe that the film gave the stroke, but it should not be taken as a novelty. The rednecks crowd screens since the film is film, and this is not the sharpest.

Americans love the rednecks. American cinema is full of rednecks. ET, for example is a space both. Elliot and his sister passed it pipe showing the American roll. Also, taught it to Terminator, Crocodile Dundee, Johnny 5, thousands of robots, aliens, elves, Martians, clones, beings fallen from a nest. There is nothing that an American Viewer likes more than see an ignorant learning the customs of America La version espanola of the both is that of rogue. Cinema Spanish, especially the 1960s, preferred to the rogue. It is the same story, but told from another point of view. The has the both and the account to other rednecks. LeBlanc, Landa, feigned to be fools to fleece rich abroad. Traveling to other countries I discovered that they have the same mythology that we in the 1960s. In Cuba, many films now laugh at naive tourists, of us, who we now are like the Yankees.Borat is a mixture of the two points of view. Borat makes a tour of America inviting us to laugh their ignorance of his inferiority in the developed world: does not distinguish a cup of a lavavo toilet, masturbating on the street and makes their needs in the gardens. The rich can laugh here. But on the other hand it is a false naive. We know that it is taking the hair to each of the Americans that interview, we know that it is not the fool pretending to be: an American Senator offers a piece of cheese and then explains that it is made with milk of his wife, in a society dinner asks if he can bring a friend and invites an ordinary prostitute. Those who live in poor countries may laugh here.Maybe that the film gave the stroke, but it should not be taken as a novelty. The rednecks crowd screens since the film is film, and this is not the sharpest. He has saved funds of production using only to ordinary people and has not squandered neurons filling meters of film with scenes of coarse humor, or looking for the scandal in the vulgar like our domestic both, Santiago Segura.La blend of reality and fiction (respondents don't know that camera that focuses on them is a stupid patochada), resembles the interviewers "Who fall fall". If this film wanted to be something else that rubbish would have to have entered the game so well handled by this television program engage in complicity with respondents, rather than grossly mistreat them. Borat has only complicity with the audience, which, it seems, is on track to achieve a handsome box office.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4023

Sandra Ríos

Soy leyenda

muchocine

Late rose, filled with hope as extreme situations are an absurdity that reveal only the mere commercial interest to bring sequels.

Once again and for the third time, leads to the giant screen the science fiction novel by Richard Matheson, with same name, which was established in 1954. At that time Matheson built a highly interesting, futuristic novel in which imagine the terrible situation that would be the last man on Earth in the late 1970s and in los Angeles, California due to the extermination of its inhabitants by a deadly virus. Viruses that make it a species of vampires or zombies.The first film who wanted to bring this story to the big screen in 1964 was "The last man on Earth" Italy. A film which featured an adaptation of the screenplay of the own Matheson, which is that most resembles the novel and which truly explore and closely reflects the aspect psicólogico of the central character. Not too distant to this first production, in 1971, carried out the second movie called "The last man alive", also known as "Omega Man". This has been the version away almost entirely from the original novel that bothered much to fans of the book. Many qualified her unfortunate and little bright in terms of history and technique. Indeed, that revising broadly, because the reality is that I not resist finish it, this version is a reference point for not to mention.This latest version that managed to disappoint such point to write about her late because I saw her the day of its premiere, I can not measure it under the eye of what was the first adaptation. In I am Legend there is a noticeable evolution of its main character and vampires. The mode of Defense are no longer mirrors, cuttings and the chains of garlic, they see all the time in the last man on Earth, but weapons, what is undoubtedly a success. Although the version vampirezca created by computer for this version in some scenes is irritating and I'd rather stay with the last prototype of this beings, created in the film "30 days of night".I am Legend focuses on how the last man on Earth after 3 years of living in solitude, has adapted to its environment and spends his hours hunting animals, sending press releases have if someone hears it, exercising in half or better "over" military aircraft (heh, heh, heh) and defending in the nights of the monsters that the rest of the humans have become. A coexistence that will envelop the audience in the psychological aspect of the character through looks limp, the sadness of a notoriously exhausted face and the use of moderate but little explanatory flashbacks in comparison to the real story, unless it comes to comply with such objective actually. Unlike the first based on the novel, there are no dilemmas for sure, there is no real crisis situations, there is no deep fears, nor crying nor explosive laughter of the last man on Earth involving one in feelings of deep emotion, thought and morality caracterísiticos of psychological tapes.Unlike the novel, there is a longstanding relationship with a dog German Shepherd named Abbey in real life, which aims to generate a false emotion in the viewer more than anything else, but that without refute it did, because the performance of this little animal is exceptional and get compungir the heart, thanks to its final destination. However are these innovations in history, with its final part which does not convinced me and by which evidence a somewhat tiresome tabloid and commercial interest.The problem here is not the performance of Will Smith, nor the desire because made his debut her young daughter of 7 years, Willow Smith, because there is no dispute the enormous effort made to build his character, discipline had to do so, which included down around 10 kilos and intense physical training to be more slender. Indeed, thanks to their interpretation and the enormous and undeniable charisma that has the tape is not worse. Nor it falls on the diseñora of production which took an enormous amount of work to build in the middle of a real scenario of the size of a city like New York, absolutely and incredibly desolate streets where weeds and wild animals are the Kings. This is the point that can be enjoyed the tape, its more actractivo and was a great achievement using real scenarios, which include places where had never before allowed filming that they reflected good shape, thanks to photography, should also be mentioned, in the final product. Nor is the rhythm, which incidentally is very good, nor the narrative structure.It's definitely the adaptation of the script that was provided, that at times tug of war and leaves show "silly" details in history, gaps that are not looked after. At this point I return his end we talked about in the beginning. A hopeful ending that reflects more a desire to generate or leave the expectations a sequel, to the desire to be consistent with the critical situation in a man to stay almost alone without many possibilities for subsistence. See more a desire to create this history to a "hero" disguised as a legend who saved us, resulting in Jesus, life for us.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/123

JPastor

Firewall

muchocine

Where they have gone into the movies as?Games of war?, I pushed to get into this?

I just got back to House after seeing, invited by McAfee, "Firewall", the new film of Harrison Ford in which the prota makes computer security expert. Poor Harrison not too gives the pego as a freak, but is that the majority of the characters are pretty crappy. We have the unforgettable Robert Patrick (T1000) that seems to have aged 50 years, to Paul Bettany wrong malísimo that not paste or glue (at any time seems to say "I'm a ghost!") ("I'm a ghost!" as if Russell were ahead) and a cast that does not convince. The rest of the bunch of bad are a few flojeras, and an uncle of 60 years can with one half of age in a physical confrontation (in fact, with two) is not too credible. The truth is that the argument is not bad, but the movie is a little truño of life. I wanted to leave a couple of highlights to the end: to "hack" the system (call it somehow), Indiana (I do say?) Directing? I say? (Harrison) is mounted a scanner of last generation with a fax/multifunction Reader toolbar and an iPod mini. I have no idea how pussy connects one to the other (the port of the helmets of the iPod is not a port of entry, and not seen welding nothing to the proprietary Apple connector) but the thing shoots incredible way: collect 10000 account numbers of the Bank (through the screen to which the reader the scanner bar is stuck at an incredible speed) and stored in the hard disk of the iPod in the form of images. It then passes by an OCR application and ready, we have account numbers perfectly registered in our laptop. That, and the collar the dog GPS (which have them Hayles, eye) are two of the technical pillars of the plot of the movie. No comment. Buf. By the way, the movie leaves Windows XP everywhere, except (I think) in a small moment in which Harrison suddenly introduces a couple of lines through a command-line to boast how controls configuring routers that found me, so at first glance, Linux, although I'm just wrong. Where have gone to the movies "War games", which propelled me into this?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/350

Marta

Verano en Berlin

muchocine

A simple story of those movies that is worth seeing rather than her removed from theaters.

I admit that I have a certain weakness for German films. The streets, the houses. remind me of the time I lived there, and I tend to see with good eyes. However, that is not the only reason why I left to see "Summer in Berlin" with the feeling of seeing a good movie for those who often go unnoticed and is fortunate to have not let slip. It is a simple story about the relationship between two friends and the small problems that can appear in the daily life of any person. This may seem easy, isn't it at all. How portray the everyday without being boring? How not just the obvious? Director Andreas Dresen manages with the help of the two actresses protagonists, the viewer comes to be interested by the lives of these two women, at the same time is that of so many others. Maybe, these small moments portrayed with great skill: the tasks as a carer for the elderly of Nike or the fruitless search for Katrin work (with those stupid personnel selection methods). The worst, the simplicity of some characters, - especially of the man which is interposed between the two - that cause that the overall impression of the film is not as good as what could have been. In any case, one of those movies that is worthwhile to see before her removed from theaters. And lucky you have projections in original version in your cities.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/133

Chuchi

V de Vendetta

muchocine

You can get to like even to those who do not read comics

Provided that we are going to see a movie based on a comic we fear that they have changed many things for the original. Later, depending on the quality of the film we can be more or less comfortable in the seat, and it is that if the movie is good always concessions can be made. This is what I think happens with "V for Vendetta". At the time I di graphic novel a note of 9'5, the highest of which I have taken from this blog on movies, books or comics that have enjoyed (or not). And in fact, I expressed my doubts about what might come out on the big screen.As well, my movie I liked, and much; Despite some negative reviews that I had read out there went forward to film. And while it is not as good as the comic (it was very difficult, admit it) Yes it is entertaining. I have to say that the character of V hooked me from the first moment, and while they change some things on the comic (not desvelaremos what) at many times the things happen as seen in the work of Alan Moore. Obviously, omitted a number of details that would have been very well, and in other cases has been very on tiptoe, which gives the film an excessive speed (its main drawback). And it is that in a matter of two hours they narrate to us facts that occur throughout a year. In addition, without solution of continuity, or abysmally type "three months later" constantly, that had Yes, slowed the emotion.The performance of Natalie Portman to my I liked, and I think that this is her you can desencasillar of her role as Amidala definitely. Shocking, and impressive especially since the spectacular "shaved". Hugo Weaving, the remembered Matrix agent Smith or Elrond in 'The Lord of the Rings'. because the truth is that it was very difficult to interpret a role where not seen the face in no time. Their gestures should be expressive enough to convey the desired emotions, and it succeeds. That Yes, we must say that it would have been very well see the original version to listen to his intonation, his voice. but it is at least the dubbing is very good. Really, get what is sought, by far: get excited, get involved with a guy who is retarded but that arouses sympathy from the beginning.On the other hand, I can tell you that I saw the film with people who had not read the comic and film caught them in offside in this pair of unexpected twists paste during the plot, he surprised really, so this film can get to like even to those who do not read comics.Highlight two things to finish: it shows the hand of the Wachowski despite not directing, even with the famous "Matrix effect" sometime. But in my not caused laughter which seems to have been caused to other persons. On the contrary, I took it as a nod, and in addition, do not abuse it. And the soundtrack to Dario Marianelli has seemed very good to the film. Thrilled in the moments that should do it. well, I've already done with her.In short, it does not reach the comic, but I liked it much. So I I do between the 7'5 and 8. I'll be benevolent, not as some university professors.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3998

Andrés Pons

Los Crímenes de Oxford

muchocine

That is a well served dish where there's the long enigmas, suspicion and numerous dangers that makes you have a good time without great pretensions.

Alex of the Church adapted the famous novel of Argentine Guillermo Martínez in a film that pretends to be another attempt of international shuttle after the nonsense that turned out to be PERDITA DURANGO. So the filmmaker surrounds two interpreters prestigious with the young face of ELIJAH WOOD that does not eat a thread from the Ring trilogy, accompanies the veteran and unforgettable star of man elephant JHON HURT, female presence rests with the Spanish Leonor WATLING so sexy as always, seen in our cinema hits as they are sea or talk to her.It is certainly an order where Alex practically denies his label that characterizes him to sign his film academic and less risky. Similar in some respects to the DA VINCI code though it may be much more entertaining, is a Thriller of the lot where we miss cynical humor or bad milk present in other works of the Basque, nothing to do with the community and the day of the beast for example although you must assess you in its fair measure. That is a well served dish where there's the long enigmas, suspicion and numerous dangers that makes you have a good time without great pretensions.We will see that as it works on the international market which is where mostly going for this product.Technically notable in all its aspects, performers are no more.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/530

Alvaro Oliva

La máquina de bailar

muchocine

A history quite dull and simple, which despite having a couple of good moments, not leaves a good taste in mouth. It is a failed comedy that will not delight the public, except the worshipers of Santiago Segura and some other very complacent Viewer.

The truth is that the new production of Santiago Segura has a good hook: he. From there and with a trailer made me want me by this new proposal, I approached the room for what I thought was going to be an interesting comedy, but nothing further from the truth. The film of Oscar Aibar becomes a history quite dull and simple, which despite having a couple of good moments, does not leave us a good taste as us happened in previous proposals of the director of Evilio.Y one of those good times, is the starring actor and Cantabrian director Nacho Vigalondo. As a cameo and in the same underground games room which developed shock (his last film), embodies the leader of a group of fairly macarras snobs. The truth is that it is a good point of the film and more when he had no knowledge of its existence.Johnny (Santiago Segura) is another character that can provide us with a smile, but which always meets and far is Enrique Villén in a very small role.Alongside these players we have the main cast consisting of Jordi Vilches, Bárbara Muñoz Eduardo García as members of the team that will face Championship machine dance, and finally a José Corbacho become a jealous son of a bitch, well played.As defects, say that those who have played once with the "carpet" which gives us the playstation and know what is the topic, will find that he agree not for nothing his dance steps with what appears on the screen of the game, except in cases where show inserts flat machine details revealing the results and points that are getting. For small (or large) this bug, the truth seems is who might have tried to correct otherwise, from learning some theme of the game to perform the choreography or masking it more, and I say this because the choreography and the steps that mark are very professional (some made by doubles to only see the feet, but others can appreciate how the actors have had to learn to move and coordinate their movements).Ultimately "Dancing machine" is a failed comedy that will not delight the public, except the worshipers of Santiago Segura and some other very complacent Viewer.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2246

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Black snake moan

muchocine

Unaffordable tape blues and sweat, little teaching redencíones and topics of the deep Southern American, whereas pelmaza and unlikely since their first minutes.

Probably this tape to join without difficulty that famous adage of anonymous author who asked to make difficult virtue because Black snake Mena is a curious movie, at least, and is also different. Curiosity and the difference do not make good movies but are grateful when overwhelm us with taquillazos of foreseeable resolution and flat ingenuity. It is also a picture of customs, a picturesque portrait of the American South with coarse brushstrokes of primitive blues touched dry stick, born of the soul and sung with enough pain as to make it credible. There it is possible to be born all possible interest by Black snake Mena, although there will be who pay seat to see the obviously of Christina Ricci in a role of risk, but grateful and in which performs superbly: a fierce nymphomaniac has no meat that lend it and lampa by being crucified by any berraco bar bar to throw. Or to the Samuel l. Jackson boring until today - when was her last decent film? -that recreates a character depressed, closed, housed in the placid nebula of the blues and recalling the happy times when he played them on stage and was happily married. These two characters, marked by fate, movingly dragged by the miseries of life and almost no resources to overcome, are the only thing salvageable from the film, which is already fairly. To her around, a script embarrassing, impossible to believe, laboriously weary during a footage always too long, excessive.Let's bear in mind one thing: If a blues lasts three minutes, a film that recreates, in essence, a blues should be a short or a mini-corto or a clip of those files that occupy quasi-infinities of youtube. No, specifically, a movie, a feature film, as I said before. There is a moment in which we are saturated in history, soaked, tired of the girl with uterine fury is wallow with anyone because of his addiction to sex. The bluesman makes therapist, psychologist, father and guru to remove it from his slavery venerea and put again to pay to the society and be rewarded by this. Already. I would add - creates that damaged anything telling this small detail of props - as perpetrated by the old bluesman recovery methods is not tying the girl to a radiator and hoped that the "monkey" go and appeases the Vertigo of the meat. This absurd mix of guitar strummings and sweat will irritate more than one, I know. It's gonna bother who go to the cinema to watch movies. It is a mere display of brilliant performances, well mounted atmospheres and a great planning on mounting. Its says there is no script or which seems that it aspires to be it fails both lost in a shipwreck of great intentions, but vacant results. Conspirators in taking forward an irregular, strange, never credible company is, in any case, respect for a director, Craig Brewer, blues and formidable choice of actors in State of grace. They had done a music video for any new song of Robert Cray or my beloved B.B. King and this would have been the audiovisual coup of the year. At least on MTV. The music is the cure. The blues is the cure, who sang John Lee Hooker accompanied by Santana in a piece that I have started background to write this review with more motivation.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3850

Luna

Interview

muchocine

Acting duel of Steve Buscemi and Sienna Miller in Interview.

Interview is the fourth film of Buscemi, one of the actors fetish of such emblematic as Jim Jarmush, Tarantino directors or the Coen brothers. In this case Buscemi chooses to adapt a script of the late Theo Van Gogh, as well as surrounded by the team that usually meet Theo, included his director of photography Thomas Kist. Not just there the similarities, Buscemi opts for the same style of realization that Van Gogh: three cameras in hand and a few free actors to improvise in this acting duel between Buscemi and Miller.Tras two weeks of trial, nine days of filming and an approach in three acts which Steve Buscemi felt that he needed the history, get a result that is a real time bomb. A stage combat, a contest between two characters, where nothing is what it seems and that can only be a winner. In the words of Buscemi "is a war for power from the dialogue." The action takes place in one night, a journalist enshrined and intellectual has to do an interview for a famous actress, but choose vacuos projects and clamoring. Despite the reluctance of the journalist, we will discover that this actress has many facets.Career as actor Buscemi did that the blonde actress so superficial as it seems get him/herself and Sienna Miller a credible and successful, performances where the viewer discovers that neither Buscemi is a journalist so intellectual nor Miller.History speaks of the world of appearances and the world celebrity from a perspective that the viewer will find extremely interesting. The narrative unfolds with good pace and freshness and after many turns still holds a final surprise the Viewer.While following Theo Van Gogh style has given increased importance to the freshness of the performances and improvisations, the warm lighting of Thomas Kist underlines the history with the fair dose of glamour and becomes the perfect partner of the narration.Buscemi's upcoming projects for the 2008 and 2009 are as an actor, but no doubt with this film he discovers as a filmmaker with its own voice, and a director whose path must be followed.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/608

Alvaro Oliva

World Trade Center

muchocine

Boring and predictable story that us splatters with continuous flashbacks and parallel actions, as the footage moves sleeping way.

Oliver Stone returns to behind the camera to narrate the fatal events that occurred on September 11, 2001. The special thing of this proposal is that it focuses on two members of the port police that they were trapped and they were rescued alive. Starting a home right, with a presentation of the attack which is almost the best of the film, Stone shows the experiences of a group of policemen led by John Mcloughlin, Nicolas Cage, who go to one of the towers of the World Trade Center to try to help, but after a few minutes login, have the misfortune that the building will collapse on top of themas all we saw in the chilling images that gave us television. From this point, the film is set in a live of the families of the two affected, who are wondering if their husbands and fathers are (respectively) live without. These roles are Maria Bello as the wife of Cage and Maggie Gyllenhall of Michael Peña. As you can guess, their characters are quite typical women distraught by his party and by theirs, police trapped beneath hundreds of rubble waiting for getting help and giving mutual support to not fall asleep, fearing not wake up if they do. Because of this, the screenplay by Andrea Berloff becomes a boring and predictable story that us splatters with continuous flashbacks and parallel actions, as the footage moves sleeping way. A fact which surprised me and I see no justification, is the fact that Maria Bello takes why those so cantosas blue contact lenses, do not know if there will be any rationale for this, because in any other of his performances has resorted to this. Let these anecdotes to continue with World Trade Center, and say the new Oliver Stone movie is not surprising for any site, which obviously has some very good moments and arriving in the chord of the spectator, as when you Will Jimeno (Michael Peña) asks the rescue team to act more quickly to help McLoughlin with its consequent result, but apart from that and some more, we find others fully exposing the viewer of his armchair, making that smiles and comments raise about the sound of the screen, and a clear example of this is the appearance of Jesus Christ in one of the hallucinations of final Jimeno.En a faithful account of what lived the two survivors, but that cinematically leaves much to be desired and that it might have been differently, although he had to slightly alter the events, because although hard to say so, the film is focused to the public and not to the delight of the director exclusively.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1993

Rafa Ferrer

H6 Diario de un asesino

muchocine

During good part of the footage and only I could breathe calm when appeared the final credit titles. Pathetic, not it can be summarized more in less...

I had not sat to read any criticizes the movie that brings us today, after seeing their pathetic way to promote themselves, I said, come hard with her sére not and given that this week I'm going to see some Spanish to another tape, let's give him a chance...Before entering field (little, so we are going to cheat) and after investigating a little by the network, I will say that after the painful promotion of the tape is the advertising agency Kanzaman, "expert" (see quotes) in advertising American tapes shot in Spain, and has the dubious honour of turn into shit everything he touches (go)(, as a King midas in reverse), his or rather, our, are the promotion of tapes so pathetic and painful as "The Kingdom of heaven", "Basic instinct II", "Sexy Beast", "Sahara". so no wonder up his screenwriter has repudiated the same indent of the tape.Finally, as they say in "yellow humour" new programmes to the nougat!!! The tape already begins badly, and is that, I do not know you, but when I see an assault a woman, but know that it is false, I get very bad host, I can not, and although I know that I usually have an acid humor and which ever kidding on the subject, believe me, everything is façade. As well, the tape already begins evil, but not only that, but that the stupid pint of telefilm starring 2 familiar faces of the small screen, without hardly decorated, so dark that I had to change more than once lit the hire of the monitor to appreciate something, trying to lay chair where there, with unnecessary and lacking planes of meaningless, both cinematic and narrative, and thousand and one experpetos, turn this film into a pathetic spectacle that should not be seen more than a few minutes, in honor of the truth I will say that I click the arrow keys on my remote control > during much of the footage and I could only breathe calm when appeared the final credit titles.Honestly, not I see the logic to spend money to do this shit of film, and then we complain that the Spanish film is in crisis.