Datasets:

SINAI

/

MCE-Corpus

like 0

Follow

Grupo de investigación en Sistemas Inteligentes de Acceso a la Información (SINAI) de la Universidad de Jaén 13

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4033

Rafa Ferrer

Alien vs Predator

muchocine

A crossover of 2 typical characters, a bunch of laborers wishing to kill them, a silly argument to the more not being able anything more is needed?

If I am sincere project called me not the least, and also did not have an excessive by the film curiosity, although it is true that this summer I've been to keep an eye on the series Alien and predator films for quite some time that I saw, go if exaggeration at least about 10 years old. Without a doubt, make a "Crossover" (mixture of two sagas) with two such emblematic characters of the FOX sci-fi film seemed a sovereign memez and once I saw that idiocy called "Freddy Vs Jason" I had to endure a mixture of torpor and desire to kill more than one. As well, here it almost repeated the same formula, flavored with cinema entertainment or action, as you can call both shapes and is very nearly the same, so we have the aliens if Lieutenant Ripley, look at her I have been throwing less during the hour and 20 min. footage and on the other hand to predators. In the middle to a bunch of suckers who wish that they loaded sooner are simple, stupid and mindless to the more not being able, go of those when you are loading you say!SIIII FIESSSTA! by that look that stupid tiparracos made in this kind of films, there is never any that you feel more or less identified. A soundtrack that blends in equal parts the two sagas, together but not riots music, that if. and a director Paul W.S. Anderson, that perhaps the best thing he has done in his life has been out with Milla Jovovich, why his filmography sucks as much as my socks after a football match room.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1606

Silvia Giner

Captivity

muchocine

This film is a failed and pathetic "attempt" to do something similar to the great saga of "Saw" Cutre-Luxe version.

This film is a failed and pathetic "attempt" to do something similar to the great saga of "Saw" Cutre-Luxe version. The director Roland Joffé (which prepares Singularity for 2008), presents this crappy as something "Trangresor" but in reality leaves muchisisisisimo to be desired. The argument has no feet or head and pisco games have nothing, are rather predictable, facilones. The interpretive cast is composed mostly by far side actors in his acting career.To Daniel Gillies you recall because the bridegroom is marine Chirsten Dunst in Spider-man, this is the most notable of this guy, whose interpretation is forced, little organic and nothing credible, but will the girl, Elisha Cuthbert, fuuuuu, it is so but so bad that almost get me a spasm in the middle of the film. In conclusion, if you don't want to waste your time and your money goes from this film papupérrimo. It is amazing as it continues still wasting budget in these shit movies, having both young director with talent that surely it would better.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1567

Emilio Calvo de Mora

El hombre de Laramie

muchocine

Western Shakespearean inspiration, emotional review of the ancient idea of revenge. A masterpiece of the western and one of the best performances of a secondary of luxury, Donald Crisp.

Anthony Mann westerns are epic in the manner in which are the Budd Boetticher. Both dominate the film script and generate suggestive imagery: the rider slightly drawn in an eerie landscape, the hero fatally marked by the overwhelming weight of the inevitable tragedy. The man from Laramie anticipates the western Clint Eastwood, who is the last director concerned dignify the genre. The argument refers to Anthology Film Noir where a man decides to investigate the reasons for it that does not require research: who sold weapons that some Indians bought to finish killing his brother. This story of revenge is not new: change the characters, sets, the score, but the plot cela the same traditions, the not mutated, pure essence where men are always pioneers and gracefully fighting injustices, which tend to be landowners who take outside lands that you paste your livestock or restless ira chieftains not consenting to a stranger passing through his plot. This is what makes James Stewart, who suffers an excessive punishment, an unnecessary humiliation. It is then when decided to put themselves at the service of Kate (Cathy O'Donnell) faced with the "waggoman" that atosiga.There the love affair, which is resolved in a unconventional way. Nor violence typical of the western, Mann stylized until reduced to a dry, minimal, concise and forceful expression we miss at fault. It engolosina not show evil, but all the escenas-clave are bathed in a rich sense of violence as the only viable solution.Filmed with a still balbucente cinemascope, the man from Laramie is a perfect example of film where the landscape is one protagonist, perhaps one more binding and decisive that the apparent and real. A masterpiece of the western and one of the best performances of a secondary of luxury, Donald Crisp.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1926

Iñaki Bilbao

Tu la letra, yo la música

muchocine

Not too much, because the movie is technically normalita, but their Wicker work and at the end leaves a more than acceptable taste. Nice romantic comedy, no more.

Nice comedy, more or less, not seeking more than the complicit in the viewer smile and think that the consigue.aunque cost a little.It is nice to spend the minutes, because the first third is somewhat static, just outlining the smiles and the characters are not yet defined. Somewhat hard to enter history, which seems to be nonsense.However, and this should not be to the credit of the script, little by little the thing takes shape, beginning the smiles and an undoubted mark of elegance and good work.This help a better definition of the gags, both verbal and physical, even those that happen off camera, as the awakening of Drew Barrymore under the piano of Grant. And an achievement is also the undoubted good chemistry between the two absolute protagonists, which may not seem more different, but which are complementary, undoubtedly because their characters are well profiled.Various minor characters, as the sister of the protagonist and her charming husband and, above all, the Manager of the protagonist, making it very well, even without articulate Word, contribute their bit to achieve an entertaining comedy romantic, who can forget altogether soon end the slide show, but it looks like while manages to entertain.Not too much, because the movie is technically normalita, but their Wicker work and at the end leaves a more than acceptable taste.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1998

Jose Contreras

Spiderman 3

muchocine

Raimi has confused the complexity with the excess. Instead of an hour and a half has shot more than two, rather than a villain has brought together three.

A friend tells me that reads the cartoons depicting, in the universe of superheroes, Spider-man the hero complex. That brings me to two conclusions, first, that the inconvenience of the movie are probably more available to Stan Lee, Sam Raimi, and the second, if intended to be complex, only stays in the attempt. Peter Parker is as complex as a sausage sandwich.Raimi has confused the complexity with the excess. Instead of an hour and a half has shot more than two, rather than a villain has brought together three. Sandman chases Spider-man because it is an outraged father. His friend Harry Osborn is a son in search of revenge which cannot comply with the will of his father. Venom is a photographer who competes with Peter Parker and hates Spider-man because he believes that he took the bride and the post. Almost all the bad guys are victims of some confusion, as the girl. That gives them the possibility of awakening of his self-deception but never before doing any dirty trick to Spider-man that feed their endless self-pity and justifies an action scene.Spider-man is a series where the transit between good and evil is not particularly complicated. Apart from the mistakes that everyone strives to commit, are external forces. The bad guys invent things that end up dominating them, as the Green Goblin, or Doc Oc. In this third installment appears a black clay which adheres to the victim and takes the worst that has inside. The Fund of "Spider-man" is that no one is bad, what happens is that a black hand, either in the form of chemical formula, or in the form of sticky engl is to blame that evil is habit. Young children they are worth those explanations to go pulling; politicians would love to have them to justify their blunders (who doubts that Aznar was abducted, either narcotizado by the pure of Bush when he signed the Pact of the Azores?); but would-be creators of complex heroes should be squeezing a little more brains.When the stellar engl takes over Spider-man and black dyed his suit, and his soul, the hero is transformed into a bad type. Which entails explaining to readers/viewers is a bad type. Evil is, according to Lee / Raimi in a provocative fringe and a casquivano, walk to the style of Travolta. It consists of paraded by a local fashion hugging the vampires and dance with frenzy as a flirt that leads his life in these slums. The property consists of the distressed look of Peter Parker, faithful as a lamb. Jerry Lewis was suffering the same dichotomy in "The Nutty Professor", when the ducks insecure teacher transformed into Buddy Love. Jim Carrey her suffering, either her enjoyed, in "The mask". All three share the same revulsion for this type of heroes in other theaters, a couple of streets below, will delight everyone.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4238

Francisco Bellón

Monstruoso

muchocine

Monstrous is a film of disasters which enjoy all those seeking a cinema without pretensions and spend a fun time that can give rise to a new way of dealing with a much-needed fresh and original ideas of gender.

A great and calculated strategy of promotion and marketing can work miracles, and become a taquillazo a film of low-budget (by American standards). The best example is the project of the Blair Witch, although Monstruoso is not far behind. Drawing the pull that are homemade videos that proliferate like mushrooms over the internet, the idea of Monstruoso, that besides original offers a special commercial hook, I had to translate sooner or later.And it is that it isn't more than a film of disasters in which the action is through the camera with which a few characters are recording the facts (as [REC] go no further). The truth is that the film is quite entertaining and decent, that is all a merit if takes into account the level of Hollywood palomitero film. The principle makes very long to introduce a few characters that are basically going to devote to running from one side to another throughout the city. It is obviously made on purpose to go creating the viewer curiosity and some anxiety to see the bug that gives title to the film and that is capable of causing destruction. Anyway you must concede that the protagonist is hexed, and that we must be very bad suertepara your girlfriend is going with another and a monster attack the city hours before travel to Japan and be appointed Vice President of something. In some of the most spectacular action scenes, the fact that the film is shot with the camera on his shoulder can significantly stun. The Visual effects are of good quality, and the monster, while little seen on screen, is very accomplished and is not disgusting or unpleasant.Monstrous is a film of disasters which enjoy all those seeking a cinema without pretensions and spend a fun time that can give rise to a new way of dealing with a much-needed fresh and original ideas of gender.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2139

Oscar Cantero

Entre mujeres

muchocine

One more among many romantic comedies that repeat over and over again sensibleros arguments.

I have never been excessively devoted to these American romantic comedies which are devoted to trying to reconcile the tear with laughter and sentiment, but since that begin all know that in the end, after a myriad of adventures, dimes and bickering, the protagonists end up together, with few exceptions.Although I must admit that I've always found curious the fact many of the great successes of the contemporary cinema from this genre extremely simple, repetitive and a little (or a lot) speech.Among women not you can frame is exactly in it, it is one of those movies where the story as a whole is of little importance and the weight of the script relies on the particularities and interactions between the various characters. Something similar to the style of Woody Allen, but bridging the gap between him and Jon Kasdan (writer and director), that even being a more than acceptable and contrasting author, does not reach the levels of brightness and dynamism in the dialogues that exhibits the New Yorker. The film narrates the adventures of a young man who aims to be a writer and who after a traumatic break-up with his girlfriend, moves to live in his grandmother's House, where the relationship with the neighbouring family soon cause a great impact on the life of the protagonist. The truth is that the film is not much, not noted anything, interpretations are rather ramplonas, and show a Meg Ryan surpassed by the role and Adam Brody too tear; disappointing by rácana and short, the appearance of Elena Anaya. The soundtrack, which saves many productions of this kind, nor gives the size. In general, except small flashes, mediocrity is the prevailing note.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2684

Silvia Giner

El ultimátum de Bourne

muchocine

Totally recommended for those who are fans of the saga or very enthusiastic of the action movies, certainly if you are a gourmet not go to see her.

Undoubtedly one of the most anticipated films of this year to close a "round" saga that has kept us in check since 2002 thanks to a perfect combination, palomiteros Tony Gilroy scripts and interpretation by HardBoy Matt Damon.Paul Greengrass repeats address as it already did in "The Bourne Supremacy" but for my taste this time makes it better than the previous. I do not know if it is because we finally know all the details, but this film is that I like most about the saga. Is that by now it has ended but I am sure that when run out ideas in hollywood again doing another type "Bourne Returns" or something.The man with more head of the star system. Matt Damon, is very well in his role. To me this guy even Capito I love. Nostalgia that'm me no longer the boy who was, and is that our boy has already 37 añazos (officers, insurance that is older, all are removed years already know.) and you are noticing the wrinkles. The next thing we'll see Matty is "Margaret" directed by Kenneth Lonergan (Gangs of New York) and co-starring the ugly Anna Paquin. Another interesting thing is the new "Youth Without Youth" Coppola movie whose premiere will also be during 2007. The next thing see you in 2009.The Bourne Ultimatum, is a totally recommended film for those who are fans of the saga or very enthusiastic of action films, since then if you're a gourmet not go to see her. In my case, I expected less than what I found. When it seemed that this story was no longer able to entertain us, not only get but that beat expectations. The pace is perfect, has its necessary moments of pause and a fast-paced action that never disappoints or is pre-match.Warning: Cinema popcorn, but of forced step.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4279

Ivan Villamel

Transformers

muchocine

With a job that only offers the scene of action as a source of flattery towards the film, or the interest that can cause the physical attractiveness of the actors, and above all, the actresses, nothing can save the product of the most resounding suspense.

On the occasion of DVD output to the new blockbuster Michael Bay today, I have encouraged me to take a look with some sweats cold that roamed my column before the atavistic fear that produce me the majority of films of the Sr.Bay (entire mediocrity except the sympathetic, and little more, two parts of two cops rebels). I have even done the purpose of evading any intention to seek a meaning to the film, and simply get carried away by a forgetful, passenger entertainment and make me disconnect a little both acting, technical analysis or any other type of trial of quality on the film, adding to all my doses of popcorn and coca cola, as it should be with a product as well. As well, despite my good intentions, and really promise that I've tried, again the cold sweat has taken hold of me, this new attack in the form of Michael Bay.Desde film visionando a good start rhythm of pure action, clear that any attempt to find a movie with a minimum sense of the narrative pace would be a utopiashowing Michael Bay with this Transformers what an aspiring filmmaker should never do to learn to tell a story. Everything happens at an abrupt, illogical and absurd, pace with several stories crossed in different parts of the planet just by crossing the most illogical way and impossible to view in recent months on a screen. A plot and narrative confusion which is absolute nonsense.We will never know nor if the script really exists or is a mere excuse for certain more limited than Stallone in a Shakespearean drama actors give rein to his shameful performance. All this is framed in a story that really is ridiculous, about two races of robots alien (the good and the bad, as simple as that) who seek on Earth an object that will give you the ultimate power to some, or will protect the universe to the other.With regard to those actors that teem by the film, say that of course, as good mediocre Hollywood blockbuster (and Yes, I think that it there are good, but not this one in particular) used different actors of various strata to satisfy all kinds of audiences, starting with the beautiful faces of television advertisement essential in any work (sic) of Bay as the beautiful Megan Fox and Rachael Taylor, or his male version with Tyrese Gibson, Josh Duhamel shedding testosterone by every pore of his body (to the delight of the girls), and adding young actors as the promising Shia Lebouf, in this film is perhaps of little salvageable, or actors of some standing that one wonders that demons do in this void, such as John Voight and John Turturro (simply painful East last). Mention apart for that irritating black actor named Anthony Anderson and their corresponding appearance in every movie of this kind. Truth that if Megatron I was going directly to this without think about me so.Little more than add, horrible narration, awful script, stupid dialogues everywhere, and little to save from such nonsense. If we add lasting exaggerated for the little story that counts, we have the most absolute nullity film.In an effort to find something positive, say that Bay is a virtue (perhaps the only), which is to create set pieces of efficacy proven in the action scenes, the best of the film no doubt those last 20 minutes in which the high budget sees really justified their investment, with a clash between robots that remove the hiccups in certain scenes.Ultimately, with a job that only offers the scene of action as a source of flattery towards the film, or the interest that can cause the physical attractiveness of the actors, and above all, the actresses, nothing can save the product of the most resounding suspense. All of this are analyzed from the prism of film as art, or at least decent entertainment, because of course is, there will always be who to a film that is limited to stun the Viewer to avoid that you or even ask what you are showing, you find some appeal. A server.NO.Little more than add, by budget, intentions, and excessive ambition, the worst movie of the year by far.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3133

José Antonio Bermúdez

Derecho de familia

muchocine

Burman repeated film, telling us a new story that is always the same. The director transits in the dangerous territory of the routine. Adopt the same structure that has given him success.

In the words of its director, Daniel Burman, family law is the film that closes its particular trilogy, started with waiting for the Messiah (2000) and continued with the well-known El arm party (2003).Well, what is the common thread of these three films? The search for identity of its protagonist, always played by the Uruguayan actor Daniel Hendler. The definition of the identity through the paternal figure and as a result, the paterno-filial relationship. In all three films, the father represents the greatest obstacle for the protagonist. And inevitably, the relationship with his father marks his present. In the new film by Burman, the process goes by "wanting to be a father". So, how to escape to the model of parenting adopted? Through a process of maturity, described in family law.In this way, the latest film by Burman is the more adult. With a tone of daily comedy, director us into the world of Dr. Ariel Perelman (Hendler), a young lawyer who works in the Office of poor and absent. His father (played by Arturo Gotetz), also a lawyer, it is also called Dr. Perelman. Unlike his son, were mimicking their environment without engaging with customers. And Ariel the more tries to be another, most resembles his father. There is a fact which will mark the life of Ariel. He meets Sandra (played by Julieta Díaz) and they have a son.Then opens a process of maturity. That which is far from the confusion of becoming father even without knowing be son. The inherited road and the chosen merge in a same fate: the construction of parenthood. Ariel wants to distance itself from the model of parenting he inherited from his father, but how? There is a moment in which Dr. Perelman, father of Ariel, will change its attitude, will show more caring, more involved with their affective relationships. A misterio.todo an earthquake for Ariel.Burman repeated film, telling us a new story that is always the same. The director transits in the dangerous territory of the routine. Adopt the same structure that has given him success. He walks away brave directors of his generation, such as Lisandro Alonso, Lucrecia Martel or, indeed, Martín Rejtman. FAMILY law is not surprising. More of the same: paterno-filiales relations as a problem to the personal fulfillment of the son (insurmountable the invasions of barbarians by Denys Arcand). They are rescued Hendler and Julieta Díaz's performances, and we are still waiting for a step forward in its Director, as that surprising TODAS LAS AZAFATAS VAN to Heaven (2001), his best movie to date.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1297

Jose Contreras

Noche en el museo

muchocine

His figures not wrecking you the Museum has to investigate about them: have to learn history, paleontology, natural sciences. Culture becomes, with this formula, a survival kit.

Films as "Night at the Museum", or "Jurassic Park" and books like "The Da Vinci Code" want to approach the world of mass tastes and culture. Do something similar to the MOM that adds cream to the yogurt that does not want to eat the child. The danger is that the child will stay with the cream and leave the yogurt. Many will leave the film without remembering Attila, the Romans or the old West, and remember that the Tyrannosaurus moving the tail like a poodle. Which, on the other hand is an incredible success.Who has seen the trailer for "Night at the Museum" already known throughout the film. Ben Stiller is working on night duty and discovers that the Museum back to life when it becomes night, cowboys miniatures, miniatures of Romans, the figure of wax Theodor Roosevelt, the skeleton of the Tyrannosaurus, the statue of the island of Java, an African jungle, guardians of the mummy of a Pharaoh, Attila and his Huns four. What is explaining to our rational minds such wonder? In addition, course, the desire that all us devour something strange happens when we are forced to go to a Museum and we die of boredom. The film does not offer the explanation to very advanced footage, appears confident that the show can sustain long time without explanation, and it is right.The welfare of the movie spirit consists of convincing us that museums are valuable, and that culture does something, against all the evidence offered by the television in the opposite direction. The game intends to prove it is ingenious. Ben Stiller has to keep in order the Museum if you don't want that they fired. His figures not wrecking you the plant has to investigate about them: have to learn history, paleontology, natural sciences. Culture becomes, with this formula, a survival kit. It becomes something terribly concrete, a kind of round of questions and answers, more akin to a television contest to a book of truth. But the idea works.Even a dramatic arc, the protagonist has an evolution. With so many accessories, no wonder that it has been a taquillazo. Ben Stiller is a loser fails to a permanent job and his son asks him why is not like the others. The journey is, for him, demonstrate that it is special. The side, real or figures, menudean filled with complaints and problems. And the second success of construction is the way that the plot has answer for everyone. Not let or one just forgotten.Perhaps the film is not a good argument to demonstrate how useful are the museums. To my me reaffirms that they are a suckling pig, because everything that happens only happens in the movies. But what does get a snapshot of the sensation is a riot and tranquility which was reached after negotiations with everyone. After connecting.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2805

Berto

Ratatouille

muchocine

The younger members of the House will be that they will enjoy and spend it pipe with our new friend Remy. In honor of the truth, is one of the best movies of the summer. If you have not yet seen I recommend that you go to see her.

Today I will talk about a film of one of my favorite genres, animation. This film is titled Ratatouille, and has been produced for Disney by Pixar Animation Studio. Just to know that it is a Pixar production, we can only imagine that it is a well made movie, full of Visual effects and very colorful, as were other films outputs from the same study as Cars, Finding Nemo, the Incredibles or Toy Story.La story takes US to France, more specifically to Paris where a rat (a simple rat)(, name Remy) has a natural talent for the kitchen, she dreams of becoming a great Chef, on his way he meets a clean ducks and clumsy dishes for the kitchen, Linguini, that by joining forces, the two will be able to become the best chef of all France through critique of the most feared critic cuisine of the country in my opinion, the film is a bit longdo, are almost 2 hours, and this is excessive for an animated film that is impossible to achieve the same rhythm throughout the entire film, despite not achieving a great success at the box office, I believe that technically beat his films? rival? as the Simpsons, or third Shrek. It can put you some stick, as it makes no any joke aimed at an adult audience as its competitors, but I think can forgive you. As all Pixar films is a moral, and is the forward and strive to exceed our limits and achieve our dreams.In conclusion say the younger members of the House are those who most enjoy and pipe to spend it with our new friend Remy. In honor of the truth, is one of the best movies of the summer. If you have not yet seen I recommend that you go to see her.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3067

Francisco Bellón

La gran estafa

muchocine

The great scam is a film that makes true honor to its title, already that anyone who goes to see her will feel cheated

There are titles which deeply marked the evolution of the work which give name, either positively or negatively. In the film, the art of holder has subverted altogether, becoming one mere element of the marketing of the film. Many of these titles are misleading, designed with the sole purpose of attracting an audience different from which is intended for the film. And it is always the incomparable work of translation of the distributors. An example of a couple of years ago is to change eternal shine of an immaculate mind by forget of my!Despite everything, put a title as the great scam is dangerous, because it can generate scathing comments from the respectable, especially at the end of the projection. Lasse Hallström takes revived interest in the figure of magnate Howard Hughes to tell us the story of a man who misled the world at the expense of the eccentric millionaire. At first glance, one minor issue for a filmmaker who has made works as memorable as the rules of House of the cider or Atando Cabos. It is a pity to see how Hollywood fagocita a majority of directors who come to their doors, making them mere comparsas. Turning to the great scam, the film has a boot more than decent, interesting to the viewer with a good pace and good be Hallström. However, as this modern Rascal is immersing in his own lying, the tape is becoming increasingly heavy and slow. All this coupled with the fact of knowing the outcome from the outset (there is even a scene that telegraphy own final) the plot to lose interest. Richard Gere for his part is not very convincing, despite being a role tailor-made.The great scam is a film that makes true honor to its title, already that anyone who goes to see her will feel cheated. Worst of all is that the film follows the descending line of Hallström started with A life ahead and Casanova.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3095

Francisco Bellón

La Señal

muchocine

The signal is first and foremost a Ricardo Darín tribute to the memory of Eduardo Mignogna, and also is a good example that you can nowadays also make film noir

On 6 October (coincidentally a day after the commercial release of the signal in Spain) will comply with a year of the death of the Argentine filmmaker Eduardo Mignogna. She kept the script adapted his own novel, film that was to star in his friend Ricardo Darín as posthumous legacy. And as homage to Mignogna, Darín accepted the challenge to co-direct it with Martin Hodara.Se is rare to see a film noir plot set in the 1950s that it comes not from United States, or at least will be set there. Kid Corbalán (Ricardo Darín) is a mediocre detective that one day receives a Commission from a mysterious woman named Gloria (Julieta Díaz). Without realizing it has, Corbalán is in the midst of a settling of accounts between mafias and personal vendettas. From the first scenes the viewer checks that Ricardo Darín has learned from great filmmakers with which he has worked, and incurs the typical faults of the beginner. Very is achieved the setting of the film (notably his photograph almost in black and white), with an aroma to classic film noir that intoxicated the senses of any good lover of the seventh art self-respecting. However, and despite Darín and Hodara manage print to film the power and intensity needed, the story itself has slight ups and downs. And how not, Ricardo Darín actor returns to give us another interpretation simply master, and is easy to imagine him as a companion of misadventures of greats like Humphrey Bogart. The work of Diego Peretti, coming out of a risky way rather than airy record change is also very good.The signal is first and foremost a Ricardo Darín tribute to the memory of Eduardo Mignogna, and also is a good example that you can nowadays also make film noir (see the good German), and that this is not exclusive heritage of Hollywood.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2048

Txapulin

Zodiac

muchocine

The last film by David Fincher, director excited Seven promises what is not, and that is his major problem.

The last film by David Fincher, director excited Seven promises what is not, and that is his major problem. Both his trailer, as its synopsis, and the background of the director (basically the aforementioned Seven), as the first hour of footage, they argue that we we have a whodunit, a film in which that some cops try to discover the identity of a mysterious killer.Seven was amazing at the time by its solid script in relation to the seven deadly sins and the sordid deaths appearing therein, but neither was a classic whodunit, the murderer appears quite before the end of the film, which surprisingly, ends not with the discovery of the identity of the murderer, but by solid rounding of the structure of the script.But Zodiac is not surprising. Moreover, does not want to surprise or it pretends. To make matters worse lasts nearly three hours when I already half guess the murderer and we know that that's not going to be the important thing, not strange to the people in the film end sick of the last hour of footage. Go warned, I think, therefore, to see this movie. It is not a movie for police to catch a murderer, they tend more to be a kind of pseudodocumental, or a dramatization of an actual police investigation. From one point in the movie the important thing is not who is the killer, but the obsession of (certain) police and (some) journalists to discover it, and that is what us portrays here. We have therefore a film of characterizations, both setting and interpretations.The historical setting is very successful. It can be more or less easy to find costumes and hairstyles of the 1960s and 1970s, but the flat broad of a changing San Francisco over the past two decades are incredible. The interpretations are more adjusted, they are well Mark Ruffalo as the COP responsible for the research, and Robert Downey Jr., that although lately it makes similar roles (see A Scanner Darkly), and something will be, is not bad. Jack Gyllenhaal, on the other hand, I think that is the most complex character and does not give the size.Total for a three-hour movie set in the 1970s, is now Spielberg Munich, which, besides the fact that it is also very well done, relates facts of much greater significance, both historical for the characters. In any case, for those who go warned, Zodiac is not any bad film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3817

Ana Belén Pacheco

La Huella

muchocine

The film is quite mediocre, unoriginal but it has fantastic actors in the leading roles. Despite his strenuous efforts in few moments get attract viewers that they end up losing the interest.

I read on one occasion when they were shooting the film that Michael Caine confessed that he was tired of that Jude Law won the pan base to destroy his films playing him. Therefore agreed with the eyes closed the Remake of the footprint in which reserved the role had earlier played Sir Lawrence Olivier as dignity in 1972 production directed by Joseph l. Mankiewicz and leaving the address common friend Kenneth Branagh. It seemed to be a perfect plan, more if it should be that which is at the beginning of the tape.The footprint is not so fresh, so round and as entertaining as the original. Normally the remakes tend to have these glitches that seem so fantastic to the public that is unknown to them, in this case even the public to know the original has managed to get bored. The penalty is the new, pseudo alopécico Jude this intends to be a serious actor after the fiasco of the last years but seems to be that either the box office or critical have not the slightest intention to grant him the benefit of the doubt while watching the latest movies presented can not culpr anyone from the disaster that isn't himself. Modest fund-raising in the film both in England and in Spain. Not only by the stench of several remakes that tirelessly stars if not for the unquestionable theatrical mood of the same. A young actor, hairdresser person in the mansion of an illustrious writer of success to negotiate with him the divorce from his wife is now loving. Soon the handsome suitor will be tempted by the old man to get money at the expense of faking a robbery, this will start a terrible game where each will have to figure out how to win his peculiar sets and where the money, ambition and ambiguity will have a predominant role.The film is quite mediocre, unoriginal but it has fantastic actors in the leading roles. Despite his strenuous efforts in few moments get attract viewers that they end up losing interest in a story that becomes slow, unoriginal and quite predictable.At least this was a good thing, Kenneth Branagh decided that next year his Hamlet in the West End has the face of Mr Law, perhaps thanks to the theatre get lift head and recover the interpretation and the attraction that had a day.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1991

Iñaki Bilbao

El hombre de Kiev (The Fixer)

muchocine

The script of Dalton Trumbo, without fissures, and rich in nuances. Superb dialogues. A film which is worth seeing for many reasons. Great film, splendidly directed by John Frankenheimer.

"A Jew, tired of the life that leads, because it doesn't work, has abandoned his wife, because she could not have children." It is directed towards the capital. There he meets Cossacks treated without mercy to the Jews. One day, he sees in the middle of the street a drunk man about to die frozen. This helps and saves the life. In gratitude gives you work and shelter. However it is an anti-Semite. One day, a foreman of the anti-Semitic denounces him as a child killer. "It starts for him a struggle for its survival". "Exceptional release in Metrocolor." Accused of a horrific ritual crime, a man stands against injustice. "A real-life event inspires the most dramatic and absorbing film stories."Thus prayed the advertising of the program of the new Teatro Circo de Cartagena, back in November of 1970.Estupenda splendidly directed by John Frankenheimer. It is very good and entertaining, although quite strong and cruel. Performers highlight their qualities, merit chapter besides the great Alan Bates, with a real creation of his character. It was nominated for an Academy Award for this work. Brilliant photography and setting. The script of Dalton Trumbo, without fissures, and rich in nuances. Superb dialogues. A film which is worth seeing for many reasons.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2448

Silvia Giner

Ladrones

muchocine

The movie is slow, sleeping and pretentious. Poor Juan José has behind him the weight of a failed movie what however in other hands, could have been a great movie.

Film label crappy Danger where is spoken of love, a mother, a girl, to a memory.I will try to be brief. Jaime Marques Olarreaga directs this stinky film with so little talent that I believe that if my little brother had charge of the direction, the result at least it would be bearable.The movie is slow, sleeping and pretentious. Poor Juan José has behind him the weight of a failed movie what however in other hands, could have been a great movie. The script lacks chicha, but everything that is argument think it has pull. The goal to achieve is that the Viewer is excited in such way that leave the cinema trying to steal wallets pq everyone who creates the director has overwhelmed it. However, what you want is to end the visual torture as soon as possible. I say that it is pretentious by Jaime Marquis tries to uses a pseudo-poético language through their images fails, is a tedious pace, slow.Reviewing the direction of actors, I have to say that they are all fatal, and when this happens it is the fault of the director, so is that an intensive cursito in coaching with Augusto Fernandes Argentina I recommend Jaime from here (which not Fernandez), because it is difficult that Juan José is loose interpretation.María Valverde that I loved in the Borgia, click here also and is that this girl when it comes to scripting, slow rhythms cadenciados intentions pulling to dramatic, always shows the same face and clear and tired. Ay! Maria Maria that see you the plumerillo with Juanjo, the girl was shaking and was not played XD. We are going I also temblaría to the irreverent Juan josé dust Ballesta.Me liked the soundtrack and Juan José (idyllic until the esquizofrénia), the rest in the trash.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/302

Jesus Lens

El señor de la guerra

muchocine

It shows a scary world, but that is there. Five hours by plane from our comfortable lives.

We writing a few weeks ago that the American cinema is living a glorious moment in such a way that many of the great films of the time are showing an admirable level of analysis of this society globalized in which we live and a stimulating political commitment to the cause of truth, freedom and justice. "Lord of war", written and directed by Andrew Niccol, represents a step further, another link in a chain that we forwarded to recent films like "Syriana", "Munich", "Crash" or "good night and good luck". Where are the weapons with which millions of people walk wars every day, to entire width and length of the world? That is the question. And as cynically tells in first person the character played by Nicolas Cage, it is not a trivial matter.The film starts with a powerful and impactful sequence that shows the path followed by a bullet since it is not only a piece of metal on a machine of assembling unless it is embedded in the head of a poor African kid, splashing it all blood. At that point, all spectators we look back in the seat. and we took not already off the eyes of the screen during the two hours of projection.Among the best finds of the film is the point of view adopted by Niccol. And may have chosen a third impersonal and analytical person that escrutara, Deus ex machina, an arms dealer activities; opts for a more complicated but much more stimulating solution: giving voice to the despicable character in first person. Gives voice to a sinister dealer which, moreover, is the absolute protagonist of the story. A drug dealer that the audience hates and despises, of course, but which also he is a certain sympathy and to a point of admiration for his coolness, their professionalism, their determination and their capacity to succeed even in the most complicated situations.Nicolas Cage, an actor that has never been my devotion santo, is superb in its recreation of the cynical businessman that conquers the woman of their dreams through a clever ploy that tries to convince himself that his activity is not as bad as others think, it is justified with the "If did it not I""", do any other ", which makes a mockery of all that you are trying to leave him to step and comes to avenge cruel and ruthlessly of their enemies.""Lord of war" shows us a scary world, but that is there. Five hours by plane from our comfortable lives. All African sequences, Liberia and Sierra Leone, dreamy, very harsh, shocking, are masterfully shot, transmitting all the horror describing already Conrad in "Heart of darkness".An excellent film that puts the finger in the wound of one of the most distressing situations we face in the world today. "As says the character played by Ethan Hawke, the real weapons of mass destruction are not atomic or hydrogen, but the AK 47 bombs, the popular Kalashnikovs, these goat horns, so simple, until the kids can be real butchers with them.""Lord of war" is based on an excellent script that brings you a smile, a moment later, left you her frozen face, turned into a grimace of fear. A script full of memorable phrases - "the bullets change more Governments than the votes"-, Manichaean whatsoever and with an apotheosis end which, fortunately, is at the height of the rest of the film. A film that forces you to constantly talk to your Companion's armchair, to make comments and Apostilles, which annoys you, you turn on and you upsets. "Lord of war", in short, is one of those movies that, passing in a sigh, invited talk, reflect, discuss and think. Nothing less.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/806

Tito Chinchan

Vente a ligar al Oeste

muchocine

Alfredo Landa runaway. The argument is pretty weak, but as entertainment for a Saturday afternoon movie is very suitable.

Spanish Cinema finds its shelter in the television program "Film de Barrio", that every week brings us the newest of those years in which Alfredo Landa was a ligón persecutor of Swedish. With stop or Carmen Seville, the essence of the program remains intact, and brings us juicy movies that we could not see in any other way. Viva cinema of neighborhood and the mother that bore.The film is about Benito, a sad guarda-agujas you want to climb on the bandwagon of the Western films that were recorded at the time in Almería. The designs of the destination make it achieve its objective and there, with tenacity, luck and Iberian male extract is getting a hole in this crazy world of the western.Saturday afternoon, get out of the NAP and get the fabric to see film of neighborhood is a Russian roulette which not everyone dares to play. I did and I took this one, rather than one of Joselito. I have to admit that the movie I liked, rather than die of laughter, but I had as a dwarf. On the one hand, Alfredo Landa, which is of the finest actors that we have been able to have throughout history. And I say that seriously. The deployment of media is doing here is spectacular, always limited by the script. We also have other greats like José Sacristán or Chanquete (before he died) that has a tremendous momentazo. Not to miss the scene where wall deer speaks.In short, the argument is pretty weak, but as entertainment for a Saturday afternoon movie is very appropriate. And for all the family. Alfredo Landa runaway.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3436

Estesoyo

Spiderman 3

muchocine

This Spider-man is a hero for children, dull and infantiloide, and convenient to see below the teletubbies. Only lacks it the hug at the end. But that guy more bland by God!

Taking advantage of the output in dVd of the film touches review the big premiere of the season. This spider-truño of Sam Raimi continued in the descending line of quality that we already tries to get from its first part. I am not clear whether it is a child or directly a scam. For my part zero insurance.Another two hours and peak of continuous truño. If we make memory, the first part had first half an hour really good, with a presentation of characters quite adjusted to the comic. and little else. In the second at least we have a bad with charisma (with the great Alfred Molina) and a tremendous scene (which stops as a mono-rail can) and again little else. But this third already has nothing to what power grab. There not bad with charisma Summit moments. even the own Peter Parker makes it unbearable.But the truth is for now while I don't expect none of Sam Raimi, an individual who works better as commercial that as director. He began making gore and has ended up selling his soul to the industry. Already it had fogueado with television series for children, type Hercules and his cheerful company (series that good are very to do with your children from 8 years, it must be said). But now released to the blockbuster series Spider-man, which threatens us with go and go until exhaustion, makes water everywhere.First the story. Damn, they are super heroes and may not be very deep, but more than two hours should have something with a bit of criterion, not confined to amass characters who change sides as if change of jacket. Explain a bit what happens usually is not bad, Sammi. The argument is unfortunate and is dedicated to stun the Viewer: the man of sand looks good but then is bad and at the end that he regrets. then the Goblin is bad, then you lose memory, then bad again and good end until it dies. the black spidy is bad so when he has no powers. The relationship between them not achieved and with each one seems that it could have been something more.Then the special effects. go Uncle effects shit. Even my 4 year old daughter realizes that is a cartoon. It is very poorly made. And the action let alone. All the while receiving blows against pipes. Clonk! He fights the man of sand. clonk. he fights the Goblin. clonk. with the black spidy. clonk. a fucking healthy pipe in all New York must not be. That Yes, all stood as if nothing, total, such as super heroes. Fights are too confusing and do not contribute anything. I personally bored me quite during all the action. Finally the characters. While it is true that they usually do not have too much depth here the loop is crimp and they are quite flat and linear until exhaustion. That Spider-man has it very thought... becomes unbearable because of the believed that has it, that if the bride is sad because not triumphed. therefore throughout the film unbearably sad and ñoña. If someone has doubts of what is a linear character and only flat development has to do is film. Very bad, and the characters are emetics. The actors adapt perfectly to the role doing a really bad job, it is high time to renew the faces of the players, because from now no longer have apart from worsening.This Spider-man is a hero for children, dull and infantiloide, and convenient to see below the teletubbies. Only lacks it the hug at the end. But that guy more bland by God!, in the comics at least has some sense of humor, but in the movies is a terrible truño. And the trouble is that we are going to continue to endure so long, that despite everything he has been one of the successes of the season.The thing is so bad that scared thinking how it will continue to deteriorate in the next part.Summary: history does not interest, the characters induce me disgust and effects are shit. guess the result.Score: Zero stars (0 / 5)

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1660

Evasee

Concursante

muchocine

Contestant is a desgarrada and vitriólica criticism of the economic system and the banks and the plot hooks you, with a history that is both macabre and ironically funny. Film fun, intelligent and done here.

Last Thursday I went to the preview of the contestant film, kindly invited by however friend and executive producer Xavier Villaverde, author inter alia of the great "13 bells" or "Finisterre".You know my deep animosity towards much of the Spanish film or Spanish music (well, does not know it but now yes) motivated in large part by a whole class of clunkers (subsidised a large majority) with which flood us the billboards and radio ora Yes, ora also. When a story is good, when the script is good and also the actors are great it happens that we have a good movie like this. Contestant is a desgarrada and vitriólica criticism of the economic system and the banks and the plot hooks you, with a history that is both macabre and ironically funny.Production and above all the post-production (digital, which gives some moments of the film a dreamlike atmosphere) are very collected, and (I'm going to say is not pejorative, but I say this as a compliment) makes that at times you feel to believe that what you are seeing is a harbinger of Audi. Of those that you like to see, that they consider not you idiot? Mr Sbaraglia borda, his role as poor wretched, unable to handle what comes on top is good, and he exalts. Myriam Gallego his wife is great, and of Chete Lera, little can be decír. I always thought that it is one of the best players in the world. Luis Zahera also is that secondary, likeable and bastard that makes each of their inroads made very funny moments.Some foreign are shot here in A Coruña and its sea, its foreign and its Sun, manage to be a perfect counterpoint to the gray and rainy images of the city, or the Bank. The music is another great success, media times, or the hardest guitarreos, even the electronics fit perfectly with the story. Maybe can blame you it stretches a tad in excess the end but my modest understanding, is something that overshadows not a job very well done. Film fun, intelligent and done here.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/309

Calaf

Extraños en un tren

muchocine

You can not miss this round history where there are many of the virtues that led to the categóría of genius to the prolific British Alfred Hitchcock

Although I saw many years ago, I'm back to review and enjoy one of the masterpieces of Alfred Hitchcock, although I promise to start little by little comment to genius, not all his filmography (directed 53 films) but more than 30 titles available, helped of the magnificent book that gave me a friend (thanks!) on the British filmmaker.I find it difficult to talk about this film without comment or support me in some of his scenes, so if they have not seen, I recommend you to see (is a real wonder of intrigue and narrative perfection, with a multitude of memorable levels), and then read what comes next.Although Hitchcock was known as the master of suspense, it is more than the narrative technique. In this film is not extra or a plane, which is executed and filmed with brilliance and perfect calculation. The beginning is already promising. A long travelling focusing the shoes of the two protagonists, (already describing in more detail of the imaginable to them) that they lie and face on a train (after this setback shows us their faces).After this encounter, Hitchcock already attracts our attention with the histrionic tie of the Bruno character in a poetic interpretation (thus labelled Truffaut in his famous book interview with the filmmaker it) by Robert Walker, diseñana by the own Hitch. most memorable scenes. The murder of the wife of the character Guy Haines (in a loose interpretation in my view of the actor Farley Granger, that virtually repeats character of La Soga) seen through the reflection of glasses fall from the murdered.Or how the director does to look almost in the only way possible in Bruno in the middle of a crowd of people watching a tennis match: all will turn right head left him less.Or how Bruno strangles virtually with the look to the character played by the daughter of the director: Patricia Hitchcock (see photo with the father), in a prominent role secondary, not necessary for the story, but that brings so much, as another daughter with glasses of Senator Morton. In this film we see once more how Hitchcock raises questions that the viewer would be faced with a certain situation, and then gives you an answer, more or less convincing, but that leaves you satisfied. An example: when the bride of Guy begins to sense that something is happening asks him how he convinced Bruno to kill his wife. After clarifying Guy that was not the case, that Bruno is an unbalanced that is making him blackmail, she asks the question that the Viewer may have had in mind: why did not turn to the police, or why not entrusted in it from the beginning? Response that offers Guy: why, have to think like you you thinking in a principle? Which was unbeknownst in crime?Another feature of the filmmaker. The game with the Viewer. There is a certain point in that Guy calls Bruno and tells her that he has changed of opinion and that wants to put an end to all this, assassinating Bruno wants to the father. He then goes to the House of the father of Bruno. Hitchcock does not give a single track of if it has really decided this and has taken this option, so playing with the public. Finally we am relieved to see that just wanted to notify the parent of the grave danger that runs with his son, unbalanced.Another admirable virtue: the coherence of vision of the camera. If Hitchcock presents a scene with two characters talking about and one of them is sitting and the other standing, the usual plane - contraplano in the dialogue of the two makes it with a plane crushed (from above) and with another contrapicado (from below). These flat contrapicados are special taste in director, as used up to focus from below his characters when down a staircase for example.Again mentioning the book of Truffaut, he said this Alfred filming scenes of killings as if they were scenes of love, and vice versa. It is perhaps somewhat exaggerated, but in this case clearly prefers to the villain of the piece, treated with benevolence and exquisiteness, as when burning the balloon of an annoying child in the amusement park. It makes us identify with Bruno in this ugly action.More memorable scenes: the recovery of the fallen lighter to a culvert by Bruno. How is it able to create suspense in such action? Get well.Or the magnificent final sequence of the runaway guy alive, with that fight between the hooves of the horses of the same (great). Apparently, he acknowledged it was played with the type that should crawl under it to stop it. He said that if had reared its head. is it would have not forgiven him.It can be ridiculous to criticize something, that the va radiating the game of tennis to do so for all the public presence (including players) meeting with comments as such or which is playing well or poorly, or is risking. in the end. do I had to put some sticks not?That who not been seen, not to be missed this round history where there are many of the virtues that led to the categóría of genius to the prolific British Alfred Hitchcock.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1468

Caruco

Juegos secretos

muchocine

Todd Field maintains its ground intact, but very estimable and putting in scene at least three major issues, linking them between if and involving their characters in them.

Three (are they supposed) respectable mothers and housewives in a park seen in the distance and, if it is necessary, with a prismatic, the sexual object of his desires, a burly and attractive father who comes to the place with his son. Although its presence to the peat and excited, they will never cross the barrier of decency to even engage in four words with him.Another character, an expolicia frustrated by a mistake of the past (Gregg Edelman), also notes to a wrongfully with a history of pedophilia (Jackie Earle Haley). But he does it with no intention; with the self-imposed mission to make note that it is monitored, and even pour lapidary painted in his garden or threaten you personally if you feel it is appropriate. Yes that feels (socially) legimitizado to cross the barrier with that strange even to violate their personal space.From one extreme to another, so that us is allowed and what not; who we are and what they would like to be and to have, the second film of Todd Field moves. A portrait so cold as conclusive of the day to day of a typical urbanization American, the beings that inhabit, anomalies, desires and frustaciones.And makes taking a pulse that oscillates between the Sam Mendes of "American beauty" and the best Todd Solondz, stopping at the most bizarre behaviour of his creatures. Splashing in addition his story with humor so estóico as sharp, by unexpected, it resembles the Wes Anderson.Madame Bovary guiña you to Spielberg.Entre as much reference, Todd Field maintains its intact ground: eyes, silences, empty or found complicity; also of respectable beings who dare, forced or not, to cross the line of the inappropriateness or directly as punishable moral or legal action.And makes it doing a not perfect film: lengthened in your footage, with a narrator in unnecessary off, sometimes leading its proposal to average gas. But very estimable and putting in scene at least three major issues, linking them between if and involving their characters in them.The first is: the pursuit of happiness is an act of rebellion, subversion, against the rules, and may also cause pain to beloved or nearby persons. This is for Sarah Pierce (Kate Winslet), a mother and mistress of House, as a modern Madame Bovary, discover the delights of adultery to fill the gap of a marriage and a husband that already only shares roof and daughter.It is for the disoriented Brad Adamson (Patrick Wilson), trapped in a State of children unable to devote his time to work on something that not fancy you, permanent, and relegated to the shade of his beautiful wife (Jennifer Connelly), which takes the pants, and the money, at home.And it is also for Ronald (Jackie Earle Haley), another adult in a mind not so child already and Yes sickly, spoiled by his understanding mother (excellent Phyllis Somerville), living in own jail for its uncontrollable sexual deviation, paedophilia, and retained by the bars of a community that feels threatened by the presence of this predator of children. It includes a sequence with an excruciating nod to the daily Spielberg.Sublevaciones "shark".Second issue: our defects, defects and limitations allow us being the person we would really like? Until that point we are guilty of not having achieved what we believe we deserve? Thus suffer their characters, included the expolicia or the child molester.Experiences, the circumstances, the destination, the others influence, but it also springs to mind the fable of the Scorpion and the frog, where the nature of each is important even if it means to sink us in our misery.For example, a secondary character, Sheila, played by Jane Adams (which seems just out of the "Happiness" of Todd Solondz), wanders briefly for a couple of scenes. And it does coincide with the quote blind, through an announcement of the press, with the child molester Ronald. After that he invite her kindly, and within the warm brightness of a restaurant, to "share something sweet", we turn to night and a car outside. There, Sheila feel not the "sweetness" of a dessert, but also the inevitable and bitter "sting" of his short-lived couple.The happiness that is haye while we are installed in that comfort, stripped of responsibilities, which offers children, time in which where everything seems to be possible. "With what leads us to the third issue: childhood, not always successful ability to ripen, and the inexorable passage of time.""Secret games" opens with images of porcelain figures reminiscent of the children, the old and what us clings to the past; and with flat details of watches with their sounds and needle marking the transcruso of seconds, minutes, years?. Later, there will be a (vain) Act to destroy these as ornamental as symbolic objects. There will also be some more uprising attempt, but in the end (almost) everything will continue as.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3763

Alex Largo

Ratatouille

muchocine

Altogether a great animated film (from beginning to end) that will delight all those who are dignen to take a look.

The downside of not having time is that, one day, as who does not want the thing, you are writing the critique of a movie you saw in August. That sad is the world.What went, "Ratatouille", the movie about a rat called Remy and his funny goal in life: be Cocinero.La film usa its asset have a crazy starting point, fresh and perfect throughout the film and without abuse, because every minute that passes it surprises us with a scene that makes us twist in the seat (of laughter)(refers).Without a doubt the movie is a great "made in Pixar" joy after Cars. Film that although accurate and entertaining kept from being a pure visual product completely hollow to telling the same story we have been listening to for years.But good. Let's go by parts: the address: it is more than obvious that Brad Bird passes as a dwarf, and what is more admirable, that makes the public what happens as a dwarf.Screenplay: round, although not brilliant (but little lacking) reinvents himself and try not to fall (and almost succeeds) in some stupid clichés and trite jokes.Characters: (say the characters because server has not been able to do a fair assessment of the voices in the original version) are perhaps those more salsa give the tape, they congenian very fast with the viewer making has this enjoy as nice.Soundtrack: without a doubt a great soundtrack of always correct Michael Giacchino that accompanies the film without stridency and without removing protagonism to the images.Animation: is responsible for both the characters and the story are as good as they are. Undoubtedly the Pixar is exceeded (although in a less spectacular way) with this tape with the most impressive scenes (Cars was pure consumption shitty fast) have seen in relation to animation in recent years. From this magnificent and funny principle on the farm, through the flight by pipes to all and each one of the scenes that we are witnessing in Paris. altogether a great animated film (from beginning to end) that will delight all those who are dignen to take a look.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/738

Marta

Hijos de los hombres

muchocine

It is not a masterpiece not invented anything new. However, even so, it is an interesting and entertaining film which is worth seeing.

A pleasant surprise. I had read that "Children of men" promised more than what gave and, frankly, was expecting something rather disappointing - admit that the posters influence me. However, I found myself with a well made, exciting movie and had a very interesting history, although it was not the most original of the world. By 2027, in a future that suffers the consequences of pollution and violence, Britain has become an extremely repressive and totalitarian State in which all immigrants are deported. 18 Years ago that took place the last birth of the world, and the entire population attends helplessly at the end of humanity. In these circumstances, a pregnant woman will be a treasure that everyone will want to get. As well, from this approach, "Children of men" chronicles the journey of this woman to the place in which may be his son safe and become the last hope of the human beings. The film has a futuristic aesthetic or a completely happy ending. On the contrary, it is eerily close and familiar. Unfortunately, stays a little lame in the portrait of the "bad", that leaves no clear why they are so bad and are typical stereotypes who seek this woman could be persiguendo the secret documents from the Pentagon or the microchip of the mysterious company on duty. To counter, featuring two spectacular scenes. On the one hand, a Chase filmed in impressive manner (who would say that something as common as this would come to the attention?) and, on the other, a few minutes, somehow, summarizing all the film: the passage of the protagonist with his newborn baby among a crowd of people who stop shooting to hear crying to contemplatemute, the creature, and that continue killing immediately after. "Children of men" is not a masterpiece not invented anything new. However, it is still an interesting and entertaining film which is worth seeing.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/617

Iñigo

La fuente de la vida

muchocine

Traveling between the limits of shame and fascination.

The own Darren launches in the presentation of his new film the same warning I'll send everyone to read this text and is interested in "The Fountain": If you expect to see a new "Requiem for a dream" or another "Pi", best leaves the room.And which alerts is not traitorous. To view a movie of such spirit must go predisposed, prepared to open the mind without complexes. Pray even several sentences. Relaxation. Meditation. Whatever we want. But never prejudge.Without to obviate all valid clichés for these purposes, my opinion goes in several directions. They sometimes intersect, others collide. Some of them move away from the rest and not return. Many have heady power, other repulsive. Difficult task let someone be a slight idea, when one really not know what to say. Not bad? Not good? Maybe regular? Neither one nor the other. All that and nothing of the sort.Requires that we just let everything to one side and that we try to deepen the message, complex formally, that Aronofsky wants us to launch. Maybe the message it will have to start us. There will not be another option. The rest? When the end credits appear.The director of "pi" is a very high risk creating this film. He exhibits not only the hardness of the criticism, but that much of the public only sees travelling circus nonsense.Six years led him to complete the project. Six long years in which the world of the film and his own have advanced by leaps. There enough time for Brad Pitt (one of the actors in the initial Squad) long, so the stratospheric budget be reduced considerably, so reject projects such as "Batman Begins"? and so people are aburriera and mandara him to collect mushrooms. What was said. High risk. And more for a director with so little experience, although pampered by critics and covered by the public. Double-edged for the ego of Aronofsky.Ego that fires up close to the forbidden limits, creating a film so pretentious as lysergic, exciting, epic, mind-blowing and dangerously close to the exposure of the scariest ridiculous in the history of the cinema.Emotions confronted again. To see how the bald future of Hugh Jackman climbs the tree as a monkey if it were. To see how the mystical tone of the film seems to escape from the hands at times. See how the epic air seeks, is intended and magnified with face-to-face abuse of music (on the other hand, excellent) and impressive visual effects. To see how Rachel Weisz (currently director partner) moves from the precious to just right thing, like a slightly cardboard Hugh Jackman. Although sufficient for what we want to have more general that detailed.But also, confronted as I say, to see a few scenes so sweeping and so lifts. By suffer a love so strong, tragic and inevitable story so closely. By a very interesting issue as tricky for a nothing free in the background. And to make us forced participants and reflect. As the film of truth, good cinema.Thus, if you do not strive to understand the film, there is no film. You'll only see sequences of nonsense, well disguised as aesthetic, formal and musically, but nonsense out of some understanding to the end and all.Seeking think (Hugh Jackman) in each of their times, is what we constantly seek us throughout history. Eternal life, that damn "chalice" that heals and protects, seen that element from the religious (or cultural) perspective as appropriate.And most importantly. Looking for an escape, flee the so feared death. To heal the cancer of his beloved, but for own benefit also. But you can not escape from the inevitable, nor can find what does not exist. And if for some reason it existed? would it be what we believe? Do would be Xibalba continuum star reborn or the acceptance of the death and disappearance? Would be the eternal SAP tree which gives us life or give us death/life making us be inevitable part of our planet?While I think remains irascible and his madness is going more in the search for the drug stop cured his wife's terminal cancer (parallelism that can establish both its present and its future), she makes time which has accepted his death. Decision-making simply as a logical continuation, and all you want is her husband finished it what was left unfinished. To understand to move forward. It is the only way to survive and understand: accept death as an inseparable part of our being, as life itself.But think denies its reality, do not accept it. The pain is very strong, the frustration and the loss of his beloved invade his soul. It is blind. You must seek out blindly, through intuition and knowledge.Thus the roots of the tree remain upright (unforgettable scenes of the future in which are Hedgehog the beautiful tree). We can die in peace.Nevertheless, again faced sensations appear before me.It is true that is basically a message a both moralist, that what we know perfectly. But the packaging is very attractive if you let you carry. And they say that everything is invented in the film? least the way of telling it. And the film before us may be everything, but it is also exciting and innovative.If you try to take you seriously, do ignore monkeys climbing trees, several esperpénticas situations and excesses formal or esoteric, mystical, and forget that treatment of the soundtrack reminds of "the young of the water" Shyamalan by excessive abuse of the same to enlarge the epic nature of the film (pretentious?), you will surely get to understand the reason for its existenceyour search and its reflection. It will make you feel part of it. To the best up leaves you open-mouthed.You can guess even another fine resemblance. Formally, there is a light approach to the poetry of Tarkovsky (involuntary or voluntary?), obviously with a much simpler and less metaphysical background. But by far that Aronofsky will never be Tarkovsky. Or much less.Ultimately, and leaving aside ideas/associations of the film, en tus manos is describing the film as impressive, interesting or ridiculous. do awful, pretentious, shameful, beautiful, revealing? You have the last word.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2501

Oscar Cantero

Ciudad del silencio

muchocine

American hypocrisy in its purest form, from the hand of the cynic par excellence of this side of the Atlantic, Antonio Banderas.

Don't feel special filia by the cinema of social complaint, because it is usually an interested complaint that does not show the reality of things, but what interests in the face of a box office or knows what interests. If above Antonio Banderas is put out there, the degree of credibility that I deserve decreases even more. City of silence recounts the tragic events that for years affect Ciudad Juarez, where it seems that you a business political oligarchy campa to rampant and thousands of women are killed without that nobody seems to have or the slightest interest to clarify the crimes.This complaint, as is often common in American cinema, is presenting us to an almost wild Mexico as opposed to a civilized and magnificent United States. While it is true that it refers to corruption on both sides of the border, you do differently good, as if they were normal in the case of Mexicans, accepted, while it is something special to happen in the country that electrocute convicts or simply imprisons them indefinitely and without trial.Jennifer Lopez is still as bland and anticipada that always, and now it continues to believe that having the back in place and suffice also for films. Flags, little to say; Once again it makes Mexican on a film that distills hypocrisy on all four sides.Because I will not be who argue that they worry about Mexican women working in subhuman conditions, but so far its only measure has been staying with the money have brought you to a film that exploits the drama. Incidentally, what is the film itself is unstructured, boring, lack of pace and heavy watch. Once again, the "based on true facts" that appears at the beginning, was a bad omen.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3467

Jeremy Fox

Promesas del Este

muchocine

The script is bold, amazing, perfect, but need a director of talent and the Summit of his inspiration to create a so round like this work.

Two years ago, David Cronenberg was surprised friends and strangers out, apparently, his usual film and premiering that for many, myself included, was his best movie to date: "A history of violence". After that I was wondering if Cronenberg thought continue betting for this type of film or, as did David Lynch after "A true story" (his best film), would return to a more closed cinema that left happy fans.Fortunately for him and for all Cronenberg has opted for the first roads and it has given us with "Eastern promises" (Eastern Promises) another wonder that well could be considered part of a diptych composed it and the aforementioned "A history of violence".Since the beginning the film shows signs of greatness. Within five minutes have presented us to the main characters, the situation which will cause all the history and the city in which occurs the action; a multicultural London filled with sordid and gloomy corners, more akin to Jack the Ripper than to the postcards.Cronenberg and his screenwriter, Steven Knight, we introduce in the underworld that beats under the best-known London and show us what happens when hairdressers or restaurants close their doors. A rarefied and inquitante world that fits, in the background, with Cronenberg's lifetime, although many of its fans do not know realize.All this is possible in just 100 minutes by the narrative concision of a Cronenberg is impeccable and the existence of a perfect script that is a real gift for the director and some actors who, moreover, are in State of grace.Vincent Cassel composed a frightening and pathetic unbalanced at the time which is, in my opinion, the best interpretation of which I have seen him.Armin Mueller-Stahl returned to the place that it deserves, and demonstrates the good actor that is, to create a frightening character without fuss. His smile or the simplest of questions coming out of his mouth ("does a newspaper?") serve to produce chills in the Viewer.Naomi Watts is in his line and becomes gradually one of the essential of our time.But above all, I would like to highlight a Viggo Mortensen which demonstrates that the prodigy who performed in "A history of violence" was not result of chance. His performance is memorable. Its simple form of look or move make him appear fearful or sensitive according to the occasion and without apparent effort. A shame that festivals, critics and many fans do not know appreciate not histrionic performances because the actor deserves all the recognition of the world.Cronenberg returns to make it clear that the world of violence and the emergence of this in the life of ordinary people is an issue that will as ring finger and adapts perfectly to his way of filming. Why is both capable of shooting one of the fights more brutal and shocking in the history of the cinema (as well as sounds), as of a shoot loaded of an immense nothing sentimental tenderness.Well it is true that, as I said, the script is bold, amazing, perfect, but need a director of talent and the Summit of his inspiration to create a so round like this work.If above is Howard Shore and it consists a wonderful soundtrack, can not ask you more function.Final rating: 10 out of 10

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3085

Rafa Delgado

Driving Lessons

muchocine

Driving Lessons is an interesting proposal that just however resulting in a deflate terribly disappointing.

Driving Lessons is an interesting proposal that just however resulting in a deflate terribly disappointing. The film is worn in a very uneven manner and ends up being equally tasteless (and sometimes boring) than the character protagonist (Rupert Grint), with a plot not ending interest or connect with the spectator. Fortunately the direction of Jeremy Brock makes Driving Lessons a minimally passable film by the hairs with a thankfully ligerita pace. Something in which notable interpretations of Laura Linney (for a change) and a huge Julie Walters (Oscar) also have a lot to say.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/312

Jesus Lens

Brokeback mountain

muchocine

Laudable intentions of its authors are not backed by the power of a solid and solvent film

How to go to "Brokeback mountain" free of prejudices, with everything what has rained since the latest Ang Lee film, even before submit (and triumph) at the Venice Festival?If the Cowboys gay, that if gay western, that if the affectionate cowboys, that if Queer West, etc. Before going through the box office, the truth, I was biased in favour of this film. First because the western is my favorite film genre (with the series noir, that Yes) and, secondly, because in a world full of rude maromos passed the life in the middle of the mountains, alone or with companies of cows and sheep, it is reasonable to think that affects the inclinations are escalating, confirmed and consumed in the heat of the fireAfter taking a cup of steaming coffee under a clear and starry sky.The most acute and ingenious commentators have been wondering all these weeks on what I would have said John Wayne before the first western gay in the history of the cinema. But, well thought, what lacked them in relations between the great Wayne and, for example, Robert Mitchum and James Caan in "El Dorado" to be considered gay? Except the carnal consummation, rather little.But let's leave psychosexual issues and begin to talk about cinema. And the truth, cinematically speaking, "Brokeback mountain" far from being a great movie, even if it is politically incorrect to say so.It starts well. Presentation of characters and character, approach the situation, beautiful images, a spectacular photography, landscapes of dream, the emergence of desire, the consummation. Not bad. It is not that the actors are a prodigy of naturalness precisely, but the film can be seen.After the return to civilization, the thing still progressing properly. A society intolerant and repressive, doubts, cowardice to accept with the head and acts that send the heart and gonads, marriage as a way of escape and normalization, etc. However, from that point, Ang Lee starts giving so many laps to the same matter that the audience ends up dizzy and somewhat boring.As happens in so many movies these past ten to fifteen years, to "Brokeback mountain" it is extra footage. In ninety minutes, the classical hour and a half, the film could have been round. Approach, knot and outcome, especially when the original narrative material that part of the script is a short story and not a novelón of eight hundred pages. But not. Ang Lee has decided to recreate the (bad) luck of the players and no ends to finish the story, which is twisted on itself until the boredom.Therefore, "Brokeback mountain" leads to more fatigue than scandal in the Viewer. The first hour of footage, notable, is declining to stay in a quite scraping enough. Laudable intentions of its authors, his committed, necessary and admirable speech in favor of a standardization and public acceptance of homosexual relations, unfortunately, is not supported by the strength of a solid and solvent film. Critics and members of the Academy of Hollywood, that Yes, they seem willing to continue playing its Chairman lousy morale, rewarding the history of the gay Cowboys, but it not approaching, not even close, the depth and Majesty of the just born "M$ B" last year. The truth, having been premiered a prodigy as a "Crash" (precisely directed by screenwriter of the film by Clint Eastwood), showered with prizes of "Brokeback Mountain" seems excessive and unjustified. Hopefully the time put each in its place.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/634

Jeremy Fox

Vete de mi

muchocine

Poorly topped script that opens paths not closed, features characters that do not contribute anything and let in the absolute lack of definition to others.

It lacked references about this movie but its roster of actors and the fact of being an almost novel director (must support those who start) I decided to go to see her. "Without being a major error, I have to admit that it wasn't a satisfying experience."Does "Vete de MI", directed by Víctor García León tells the following story (extracted from the press kit): Santiago (Juan Diego) has never been protagonist of nothing? or from theatre, or cinema? not even for their own lives. But Santiago never thought that it would accommodate his slob son William (Juan Diego Botto) for a few days at home both change their lives? As was to be expected, the main dish of the function are the interpretations. Juan Diego offers a recital of the reasons why is considered one of the great actors of our country and winner, for this role, the San Sebastian Festival silver shell. At his side, Juan Diego Botto, without being bad, does not offer anything special because of a little and poorly defined character. In general, the rest of the actors gives the stature, especially Cristina Plazas by its naturalness and its serene beauty that become, for me, the discovery of the film.Everything else seems failed because of a poorly topped script that opens paths that not closes, features characters that do not contribute anything and that it leaves on the absolute lack of definition to others that we fail to know his motivations for doing what they do. For example, the character of Rosa María Sardá adds nothing to the story.It is very difficult to overcome the burden of a hyphen as well and the director, co-author of the screenplay with Jonás Trueba, fails. His style is sober and intends to not draw attention but that, with a bad script, as do the Hara-Kiri before the public. Nevertheless, I would like to believe that there are grounds for hope: the direction of actors is good, there are situations that could give lot of well developed game and also, there is a clear desire to offer an adult film for mature audiences.That Yes, while we look for triumph through boring low-budget tapes and no hook, as it is the case, it seems to me difficult away the crisis that permanently, seem threatening to our cinema.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1024

Victor Trujillo

Happy feet

muchocine

Tremendous, corny and ecosensibilizado suckling pig. Happy feet is a movie without hook and with very little personality.

Mother of God and the beautiful love that can that they are taking with the pinguinito this. And that I do not have kids if I played not, buy some muñequito I crappy dancer Penguin.Found me a tremendous suckling pig this film. The first time I almost sleep. Much dancing, much rattle and an argument more seen than the goals of the Malta Spain. And it is that on top of not having originality argument is repetitive, oozes moralina and smells of rotten fish. None of the scenes are saved. The songs are almost all in English and can make sense in the language of Shakespeare, but for Spanish-speakers of middle-level that they have no idea of English, the musical in this regard enhances in no time the pace of the film, or the sensitivity of the characters.If the script is bad, the design of the sets and characters nor story. The sky in many moments you notice it is drawn from a National Geographic documentary, fuck aren't even able to currar a sky? Except for the part that humans are mixed with the penguins, the rest is totally forgettable. Of the best penguins we don't talk, because they can not have chosen a more bland and monochromatic animal to make a film of nenes.Happy feet is a movie without hook and with very little personality. Despite the final blow, which makes you shudder at times, it is very painful to devote three thirds of the footage to persecutions and pinguiniles edges to give a pildorita of environmentalist message. Do not go to see her.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1358

Yojimbo

Inside deep throat

muchocine

This documentary serves to raise many interesting aspects and all associated with morality. But the question to discuss it emerges me having seen this documentary is: be free is watch porn or watch porn?

Great documentary, brilliantly (in line with the already commented on Robert Evans), on one of the milestones in the history of the cinema: Deep Throat (deep throat).This documentary shows this porn movie as a turning point for a revolution or a sexual rebellion and as a complaint about the constant danger that hangs over the freedom of expression (though I think that it would be more correct to speak of freedom to dry).Porn, as he relates this movie, is the platform for many filmmakers to get fast money and get some kind of experience. And many are in the current cinematography as Barry Sonnenfeld or Wes Craven, which comes in this documentary "confessing" to having more than one film X.Sin however this documentary serves to raise many interesting aspects and all related all morals: not only openly advocates freedom of doing porn (bringing this film on several occasions and so naive as martyr and hero of the crusade), but about freedom to see it.Obviously demonize these "film preferences" is ridiculous and only favors to the rest of humanity feel curious and him a vote of confidence, especially when it is something new.However tells, with more modesty, half-hearted and less enthusiasm the negative entailed a revolution: mobsters who benefited from the situation, opportunists who do not hesitate to support this movement to then become radical and reactionary (in this case the feminists, the worst macho there) and the enthronement of normal people like popular Heroes of the cause and the sheet to then forget them as soon as elected.This documentary even look with nostalgia the first days of porn against industry that exists now. It also comes to question the moral change or how morality could interfere with other freedoms. And is a criticism (for a change) to American morality, as drops, currently the same laws antiobscenidad of the Nixon.Sin era embargo no longer curious that most criticisms against the USA comes from them themselves (also are best known), an act of freedom itself that some practice just when it suits them, as well as here.It is priceless to see this documentary Arthur Sommer discussions with his wife, Terry, marriage which led at the time that project the movie and a film. As many other theaters that earned lots of money with that film, both received threats from the mafia for not giving them a tithe of their benefits.And for lovers of the technical and so that they see that any means is valid to do a job depending on its nature, this documentary was filmed in format Mpeg IMX.But the question to discuss it emerges me having seen this documentary is: be free is watch porn or watch porn?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3759

Andrés Pons

La cólera del infierno

muchocine

Trying to sneak an argument to the Romeo and Juliet, go to know what were the writers to create such parida, the minimum budget is evident in a few technical effects that resemble the amateur, is again destroys a small classic as on previous occasions.

At the end of the 1980s one of the great magicians of the effects of make-up and special STAN WILSON I collaborate in countless films of success "CONSTANTINE, TERMINATOR 3, BIG FISH" among so many others, performed his greatest success as a director in a bit prolific career in that branch.I am referring to Covenant of blood which had one of the big players of serie b and the fantastic LANCE HENRIKSEN who reached great popularity with his work in the alien series or television with MILENNIUN which continues to work piece in small productions.Without being a wonder an attractive film for its great atmosphere and above all by the appearance of PUMPKINHEAD turned out one of the most bloody bugs of the unforgettable ALIEN-like GORE.All the virtues of that small success were ruined with several continuations of video-club meat. Carried out in any way they are typical sagas that are created in an attempt to get four peel using the name of a cult film.We arrived at the 2007 with the release on DVD of a new party, the fourth if I not wrong directed by the horrible HURST MICHAEL author among other barbarities of the dawn of the ZOMBIES. Repeat LANCE Henriksen as commercial insert surrounded by pseudo-actores coming out of small series.Trying to sneak an argument to the Romeo and Juliet, go to know what were the writers to create such parida, the minimum budget is evident in a few technical effects that resemble the amateur, is again destroys a small classic as on previous occasions. See examples of howls and HELLRAISER who were notable works of the most visceral horror played to lose in its subsequent sequels.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2612

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Paris, Texas

muchocine

Fascinating exercise introspection among the western crespuscular and melodrama... A master work of the film.

Road movie: the sun beats the head of Travis, which takes a ridiculous hat and a suit of sad and scruffy Executive. Do not know who he is: like almost everyone. He is alone and fatigue desert stripped of heroism, decommissioned this virile epic that returning from nothing, from hell, to resolve the unknowns that not cleared before the flight. Hell is also the city and ne of your dreams: Travis, a Harry Dean Stanton incomensurable, is an amnesiac John Wayne, a peaceful gunman seeking pin reward in tree, taciturn such, burned for lifetime gross and pathetic, but avoided to find again and gather the threads that it not anudó and are still agitatedoblivious to the biography of its owner, the carcinogenic wind of the desert of Texas. Errático, does not travel by land, not deal with sidewalks and roads, crappy motels of secondary roads and dramatic landscapes that seem not to comfort the vista ever: what makes Travis is go inward, discover in his Stakhanovite journey of citizen pure and fascinated by the uncertainty of not knowing. Or is it that we, seemingly sane and masters of our destiny, we know who we are?Poorly negotiated film except in its final stretch when the words are truly accurate. They speak before, during the journey of Travis to his redemption, images, which are portentous as rarely seen in recent cinema.Around them, as a cloak of serenity, the music by Ry Cooder, a fascinating soundtrack which is matrimonia perfectly with the history of losses and failures, random and forgiveness that Sam Shepherd, an author very unjustly undervalued, adapts that Wenders made his best film. A master work of the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/842

Rafa Ferrer

Dead or alive

muchocine

Like all those that have peeled the thumbs, giving the command at home, playing the game in which the film is based.

Umpteenth adaptation to the big screen of a video game and is that Hollywood, yesteryear, dream factory has become a kind of sponge or funnel through which passes any item to be taken to the big screen, this step see adaptations of "Tetris" or "Pac-man" film format, but time to time.This leads, is the adaptation of a fighting game, where are feminists that "divided the Cod" somehow so what happens on screen, where all the narrative power take it 4 females, and is the only potential is admire (and also babear) its more than desirable good physical, as it is hard to convey the vulgar expression to literary format "are more good than the bread with Pate the herd".Corey Yuen, author of tapes of action as "Transporter 2", "the monk" or the Eastern "So Close" (which I strongly recommend), signed the film, to the delight of the fans of the game, and action cinema lovers and fight. Where this roster of faces, from Devon Aoki ("To all gas 2" view), Jaime Pressly, view in "the dirty history of dirty Joe, Sarah Carter (who many remember the series"Smallville"as the perfidious Alice), and Eric Roberts in a few hours so extremely low, to see him fight in the few fight scenes where causes the largest of laughternot because the man fought badly, that commitment puts, but because it is already higher for similar atrocities.In short, the film will like all those that have peeled the thumbs, giving the command at home, playing the game on which is based the film at home (I have understood that movements of the actresses are quite well inspired in their virtual models on screen), the rest will therefore like see meat (fresh) and little elseforgettable, if it were not for females.(*) Peel, giving and House in the same paragraph uy uy uy.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3151

Oscar Cantero

El ataque de los muertos sin ojos

muchocine

A B movie Spanish, made with limited means but that manages to maintain the interest of the Viewer, despite their obvious technical poverty.

Look where it is now that I'm on vacation in the newspaper, has occurred to me, since my exile conileño volunteer, get to see films of the so-called serie B, but with the particularity of being the 1970s Spanish. In this way I came to me with a title that brings together almost all the characteristics of the genre. Namely: blood, guts, shouts, spirits and other things I will surely forget. They could not miss, being Spanish, their majestic female teaching a bit of pechuguilla and muslamen.The attack of the dead without eyes, who thus baptized to the creature in 1973, based on a base which is curiously today cutting today, as the lynching of an entire people is the Knights Templar who lived in a monastery in the area, because of alleged heretics and demonic practices which developed. Centuries later, will return from their graves to raze the village.Obviously, from the technical point of view, the film leaves a lot to be desired, although the story is not bad and has some interest, so it does not become so decadent as the subgenus Z. It also contributes to this outstanding interpretation of Fernando Sancho, along with the rest of the cast contributing to alleviate, in good part, the extreme poverty of the special effects.Without reaching the height of other films of the genre such as the fall of the House of Usher, the attack of the dead without eyes is an acceptable film useful for the entertainment and which might well envy many of the decadent productions that nowadays flood movie theaters.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1817

Rafa Ferrer

Alpha Dog

muchocine

Cassavetes, is already of night court, as in his filmography are titles ranging from the classic "Delta Force" to the unbearable "diario de Noa", it is now distancing itself with this film, which today is the most boring movie I remember in a long time...

Lately they are very fashionable off-road managers, and it is that there is no longer a director to be devoted and a type of cinema in particular and, like churros do all films in series, no, now managers make an and thousand tapes different, any cut by the same pattern, understand, that as human beings they are, they have to pay the mortgage, as any child of neighbour who boasts, and hence the filmic diversity, but come on, about Cassavetes, it is already night court, since that titles that we find in his filmography ranging from the classic "Delta Force" to the unbearable "diario de Noa", it is now distancing itself with this film, which today is the most boring movie I remember in a long time.We started with a Bruce Willis caracterizadísimo and unrecognizable, where after layers of latex and airbrush see actor of "The glass jungle" as the local drug capo, then we have Sharon Stone, which, applying the same this is a mother who in a flashback almost captures us what happened, after Emile Hirsch as a rapper camel, after them Ben Foster (perhaps the best of the film)(, although quite overact) and Justin Timberlake, which after two movies you still being on screen quite lost.The script is confusing, boring, slow and little real, when it is assumed that you want to capture reality through the pores, but no, fails, everything is so easily recognizable, that one can recognize the tape a thousand similar films (go no further "Wonderland" which starred Val Kilmer.).The use of split screen is useless, since the Division points to the same, and nothing different, view it 2 times, come on, that is "chuli" and overprinting of the time, witnesses and such is indifferent.A crappy fledged now I understand why has taken so long to release.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/511

Silvia Giner

Tristán e Isolda

muchocine

The movie is good, unpretentious and finally after although Iseult of wanting to vomit, the movie fulfills its purpose of entertain.

Tristan & Isolde is one of those infumables stories of love that my my stolen the heart and although it is full of all the topicazos and american screen play of hollywood I have to admit that I enjoyed as a dwarf (in the background I will shit XD).The story is based on a Chanson de Geste which even has come to represent in theaters, ballets. i.e. the Director not to discover us anything new, even there are legends that cross this love affair with the adventures of King Arthur, where it is said that Tristan was one of the brave knights of the round table, only exceeded by Lancelot.La movie, made me entertaining. Well dressing rooms and locations even have epic moments, soundtrack that goes unnoticed and the big moment arrives to speak of.The actors, God, as James Franco, sisi, that chavalín makes friends with Peter Parker in Spider-man, son of the Green Goblin who will end up inheriting the role of antagonist has grown. My God the kid looks like musculito, Shales, carita, will a babes in power and I say this already is significant pq approximately 4 years ago that any guy calls my attention. and this has done. We have a more adult, improved, picarón, weeping, James enamorado.confieso I am fascinated (James I invite you to the fair XDDD). and can say of Isolde? I have consulted the trajectory of this actress and it can be described as trivial or if non-existent or completely empty of interesting projects, will that if I had offered to my paper would have been better. Isolde passes without penalty or glory by a movie of love in which their lack of chemistry with his partener is almost "insulting", for not commenting that the creature is absolutely tasteless, has bags on the eyes and seems the mother of Tristan rather than his love interest. Patetic. how not may have chemistry with James? Well perhaps it is that it is deeply believed and asshole, often with the handsome guys and more, if they are actors and whether or not. fijensé in the scene in which Tristan and Isolde are in the cabin and she heals him the wound with a hunguento moment in which plays the abdomen of James and this looks (not from the character but from the same from James Franco) with picaresque sum (a time when I thought vibrate as a quinceañera stupid) as telling, what baby, that I am good question?, by God.Do one thing that would highlight as garrafal failure and is que.¿nadie her explained to James as walking through medieval men? they were warriors, safe, strong men. I say walk of the actor seems a University guaperas in plan "I'm the King of the girls" but in any case its attitude as a warrior is credible. (What I'm sorry James, you know that I love you but there her you cagaste).Would a reflection. have been a better Darth Vader James Franco? My answer is Yes. We'll discuss this later.Amen all this my assessment of the movie is good, unpretentious and finally after although Iseult of wanting to vomit, the movie fulfills its purpose of entertain. Although there will always be silly like me who emerge love of Tristan.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3084

José A. Peig

La fuente de la vida

muchocine

In conclusion, therefore, The Fountain, no longer a curiosity with its sporadic successes, even a certain beauty with good intentions. But, finally, making an effort we can imagine the same story with the same nuances and mystical references without resorting to a “ hard ” of their postcards.

If we look at the strict meaning of the metaphor and allegory, we can see that the use that may be made of these two forms of figuration depends on the intention and the means of expression used to create them. In literature, the metaphor served to establish a comparison using words, to represent an abstraction or idealization of the real and concrete object.The metaphor not only beautifies the language of the word, it adds a dimension of meaning, a way of looking at the world. Recalling that cinema and literature are two different languages, different resources to be used to create the Idea of the artist, The Fountain raises doubt as to whether the set of representations that we see on the screen is the work of a poet or a demiurge dramatic and vacuous. The difference between being creative and wanting to move from ready.The central theme of the work is the anguish against disease and the proximity of death, with hackneyed collateral issues that reinforce the dramatic impulse in a story about a doctor whose beloved suffers from a tumor, which pushes him to the desperate search for a cure to the disease. The story is simple and, in addition, simple, for the simple reason that it narrated - already by itself nothing original - concludes with a very trite moral at this stage. When you narras a very schematic and stereotypical story, what matters is not the story itself, but how to tell the story. From there, Darren Aronofsky decided to expand the number of representations from the base of a referent (the story of the doctor and the sick beloved) real, creates a metaphor (the history of the conquerors sent by Queen Elizabeth of Spain) and an allegory (the history of which is found in the "cosmic egg" along with the tree of life), according to the adánico myth. (Her Eva is the disturbing image of the beloved in the real world, and the same tree of life symbolizes the life of the beloved and the hope of defeating death).There are - as it can not be otherwise - correspondence between the reference real and the two figures. The story of the conquistadors is the "metaphorization" (too obvious and explicit, fix the reader that the same "Eva" stresses the need for complete the writing of the book to make the eternal love) conflict between the doctor and your co-workers in their fight to find a cure to diseases. The representation of the man in the cosmos and next to the tree of life is the allegory that expresses love and fear losing the beloved. If the loved person dies and want to overcome the fear and suffering for such loss, the only way is the transcendence, a State of being that it is expressed in Mannerist and topical way in the image of the "Buddha" which rises beyond the "cosmic egg" (transcendence of the self), which gives rise to a new life in which there is no fear of death and love eternalizes the memory.The metaphor of the conquerors concludes with the discovery of the same tree of life, the motif common to the three representations. The hero drinks its juice and dies when his own body has grown plant life. It is the representation (image) explicit of a sentence (Word) also explicitly said earlier: death may be a creative act, dying to be born to a new life. Triple redundancy, the capacity for synthesis is conspicuous by its absence. That a film is divided into three levels of representation relating to a different meaning order does not imply any complexity. What is more, and the current case of Aronofsky is the best example, redundancy produces simplification. That, in any case, serves to create beautiful postcards that are nothing more than a copy of artwork already seen in any Tome "New age", which is a scam for unwary spectators. Density of concepts and structures does not imply complexity, we insist. However, we do not dare to say that it is a pretentious film, with risk to mistake. No Vemos in the work of Aronofsky a point of honesty, a point of simplicity, to put it in some way. Tells the story of the doctor and creates stories parallel (metaphors) to add a touch of depth to its history, although the "depth" is misleading, vale as free experiment. But there is no depth because it is pure schematic redundant, as we have already explained.Following on from the start, the history of the cinema has shown that his way of creating metaphors or allegories not consists of introducing segments adjacent to result in a same fundamental meaning (is a blunder that cries out to heaven) and create unnecessary Parallels. In film, the image of the real reference is worth by itself and the metaphorical idea can be created from it. See the case of 2001, Space Odyssey, by Stanley Kubrick, masterful allegory based on a formulation on the human destiny on a cosmic scale. Or Dogville, Lars Von Trier, who manages to represent different levels and States of social life and the whole of humanity with minimum resources. SYNTHESIS, gentlemen, synthesis.In conclusion, therefore, The Fountain, no longer a curiosity with its sporadic successes, even a certain beauty with good intentions. But, finally, making an effort we can imagine the same story with the same nuances and mystical references without resorting to a "hard" of their postcards. It was enough to boost psychological States and the development of the story of love and fear of death in the benchmark real without resorting to unnecessary and explicit metaphorical images. But, of course, is much more difficult to do, and less comfortable. That is the capacity for synthesis, trait inherent to the true artist of the image.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3975

Oscar Martínez

Mortadelo y Filemón: Misión Salvar la Tierra

muchocine

Instead of mission: save the Earth, this surplus sequel should have been entitled mission: sink further national cinema or mission: kill the film.

This 25 January, and in commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the comic strip created by Francisco Ibáñez, premieres Mortadelo y Filemón. Mission: save the Earth, directed by Miguel Bardem Javier Fesser replacing and with Edu Soto, Pepe Viyuela, Berta Ojea, Mariano Venancio, Janfri Coronado, Carlos Santos, Emilio Gavira and Carmen Ruiz as protagonists.Coinciding with a major drought, a group of thugs proposes to eliminate the water reserves left in the Earth. The best secret agents in the world urgently meet, but do not have no clue. To make things worse, the evil Botijola plan to undermine that meeting, thus ending all actors. Its intention is to convert the drink that bears his name in the replacement of the water. To this end, it will try to also kidnap Professor effect. However, there are two things that Botijola did not. On the one hand, effect, before being kidnapped, hid the pieces of his invention in different historical moments, using the time machine. On the other hand, there are two international players who have not attended the saboteada meeting, they will become the only hope for the world. Mortadelo y Filemón will have to put aside their disputes to return to the action, with the invaluable help of Ophelia and following the designs of the Super. rather than mission: save the Earth, this surplus sequel should have been entitled mission: sink further national cinema or mission: kill the film. As it happened with the first installment, the adventures of these mythical characters of the printed paper have been altered to become a sort of absolutely despicable homeland freak their gags. And is that enough doubt that someone who has been raised with the comic strips of Ibáñez found the slightest grace to this peñazo of film, in which have place to imitations of the cuñaooo!.!.!Far is the memory of graphic humor of stories as the Chapeau the Esmirriau or similar, in a boring to kill movie and that is sometimes closer to aberrations in the f.b.i. (Frikis Buscan annoy) that line in the early work of the previous director, Javier Fesser, as the short film the tlompeta secdleto or the curious El milagro de P. Tinto. I speak of the previous director because the hand of Miguel Bardem is not appreciated anywhere, while maintaining the same aesthetic and style than its predecessor, the only thing salvageable from a film that broadly is certainly better to forget.Just a couple of gags can save its something more than a hundred minutes of footage, as the cameo of Toni Albà imitating the King - as does every week in the great Polònia- and some more. The rest, despicable, included the digitized dog Bush, completely expendable and lacking in grace, and that pulls on the floor general computation of special effects more than worthy broadly. Even Edu Soto ago let us miss the previous mort, Benito Pocino.Un insulting the intelligence and what is worse, to strips of Ibáñez.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2156

Patri

Doce hombres sin piedad

muchocine

To see the viewer feels like one of those twelve men who have in their hands the life of a boy of 18 years.

This film manages to convey what you intend to, it is intense and suffocating, that is why it is set on the hottest day of the year, we see almost all the characters sweating and then gets on top to rain to create an atmosphere of oppressive humid heat. This seems an unimportant detail, to my seems quite important, because if one day solitude and normal film would not be equal.Apart from this, we have 12 characters locked in a room, it is everything we have throughout the film, there is no change of scenario, except when they go to the service. To see the viewer feels like one of those twelve men who have in their hands the life of a boy of 18 years, they must decide whether he is innocent or guilty and everyone is convinced that is blame, less one, the character of Henry Fonda (which is spectacular), he has a reasonable doubt and from thereIt will try to convince others that cannot be taken lightly a decision like that.The characters are very well shaped, each one has a personality perfectly marked and that influences their views and the reasons that have to give their verdict.The camera moves lead us from one place to another room as if were there with them passing heat and deciding if a boy lives or dies; the close-ups that bring us closer to the psychology of the characters, this is a film of characters, is of the actors, only and exclusively yours and we must say that we all do very well and endure the close-up excellently are abundant and that isn't easy.With this film Sidney Lumet indicates that a very good film can be done with little money and few resources.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3466

Jeremy Fox

The invasion

muchocine

It is more of the same. Both gives me if they are aliens as if they are zombies, the scene of the protagonist escaping desperate to a horde of monsters humanoid that run like the devil, I start to have very view.

Before entering matter I would like to make it clear that I have nothing against the realization of remakes. It is a phenomenon that occurs from the beginning of the film and will not stop producing precisely now that the imagination is conspicuous by its absence. That said, I think that the least that you can demand that a remake is a look different to the same story or an update of the original elements. I.e., because we are going to do the same thing that made others before, at least do it otherwise.Therefore, despite the fact that there are two really good previous versions and that might seem already excessive the realization of a fourth version of the same subject, Oliver Hirschbiegel directorial choice gave the sensation of being motivated by the search for a new approach to history.I don't know if it would be by the novelty of the approach of Hirschbiegel but the fact is that, once its mounting, the producers decided to hire the Wachowski brothers to make some changes in the script and James McTeigue to direct additional scenes. Among others a total change in the end and a few scenes of action (sounds bad, yes).I do not know how it would be the initial Assembly of Hirschbiegel but change it, for having done something different, seems to me a good idea. Such things do not usually work and this time wasn't going to be different.Because if a problem is "Invasion" (The invasion) is that it is more of the same. Both gives me if they are aliens as if they are zombies, the scene of the protagonist escaping desperate to a horde of monsters humanoid that run like the devil, I start to have very view.Of little use that Nicole Kidman and Daniel Craig are equal to expected in them, because the failure of the movie is to have no soul. He too notices has been comeback and the final result is totally unbalanced and is topped with certain clumsiness.Gives the impression that the idea of the matter was to reflect on whether the loss of our humanity is too high a price to pay in exchange for not having wars or poverty (priceless seeing Bush giving his hand to Chavez) but this reflection is dropped without deepening the slightest therein, with intention to give the film a philosophical packaging thatin fact, it lacks.It is curious that "first version" has more than 50 years and is much more bold and has a message more radical than the film before us.On the positive side it should be mention that the film is entretenidilla and boredom does not take possession of the Viewer. Of course this is a poor consolation to decide to spend 6 euros at the entrance of the cinema.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/329

Tito Chinchan

Don erre que erre

muchocine

The work peak of Paco Martínez Soria. Tremendous peliculón for evenings of boredom and torpor

Well, so you may see that a critic of posh like me (medium hair for others) lives of its readers, I decided to oiros. It could have followed with author movies that you like so much, or criticisms of Bulgarian melodramas that you dazzle, but let's take a small twist. As the week is long and the films I see you not always interested, let's return to those films that all and all you have seen. To see if you animais and discussed a little about Spanish film classics. To start and go preparing for what can this be, we have what many consider peak of Paco Martínez Soria, so to enjoy the work. By the way, the stars for these special cases system has changed, as you can see.The film is Don Rodrigo, a man going to the Bank to collect 257 pesetas. Total, that at the time of the cashier transaction - Don Rodrigo a mugger enters the Bank and gets everything inside, including its 257 pesetas. After a bit of fuss and sofocones, Don Ricardo discovers that scoundrels workers of the entity do not want him to return their 257 pesetas because is lan when removed because they were not owned by the Bank. This begins an odyssey that surprise you the classical, with Don Ricardo unleashed that shows the values of perseverance and that justice WINS always.Don Paco Martínez Soria sausager in the costume of the noble Don Ricardo gross to defend the rights of people on foot in the Spain of the skin of a bull. Fight against giants to achieve what the desires, their longed 257 pesetas. On the way he loses more than that amount, but what is fair is fair. Well, this is a tremendous peliculón for evenings of boredom and torpor. The argument hooks from the outset by its strength and forcefulness, addition to get everyone Don Ricardo and want that justice will prevail. Situations affecting this nice gentleman Spanish are more wild, including a crazy hunt. A time peak, for me, is when a guard fine you and to recognize you want to remove the fine and the flatly refuses. Surprise your scream "Libeeeeeertaaaaaad" of Braveheart. Only lacked a Spain Viva full lung.In short, we seen anachronistically, have a light film to help us take the siesta ritmillo, but outside by the honking (cries) that stuck during all of it. If you see at the time, critical tremendous society (come on, I say, that I am not so old for having lived that time). Four stronger gold, not narrowly reaching total dandruff.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3157

Rafa Ferrer

High School Musical 2

muchocine

A crappy show that again will raise a good jug of $ on DVD and will refresh the ailing economy of the House of mouse Mickey, who not lift head, except for tontunas like these, or brilliant "daughter" Pixar movies.

The first part of this Disney film that not only collection (DVD, that we are talking about a television tape), us $ and also sold anything from merchandising that pulled the market with the nombrecito "High School.", I thought it was a sovereign stupidity, but, as Disney has seen the goose that lays the golden egg by in this comedy teen teen, and since my wife is a fan of this type of film, the second installment had to see it (would like to or not).Again, and as I said at the time, we we have a laughable show that, disguised as a clumsy musical, puts the kids (cut by the same patron) in this farce of "popularity" and stupidity made in USA.Clear of facile songs, the insistent rhythm, and the loving crap of the actors on screen, do the rest, honestly, I think it is a crappy show that again will raise a good jug of $ on DVD and will refresh the ailing economy of the House of mouse Mickey, who not lift head, except for tontunas like these or great movies of her "daughter" Pixar. Sé to adolescents, fans of the series in the world, not only will remember of me, and my entire family, deeming me snob, asshole and other stories, eye, not I blame them, but to know that there are 100,000 better than this, and best musical Bill.And see the song of the first delivery, that of "We're soaring, flying." seems to me a beautiful theme.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2582

Hombre Lobo

Turistas

muchocine

Provide or not a good, bad image or real of the gentilicio of Brazil doesn't really matter: the fear of everything that is not "our home" is perfectly embodied.

Three Americans, an Australian, two English and two Swedes traveling backpacker Brazil. After a night in a lost paradise beach with easy sex and alcohol, they wake up realizing they have drugged and robbed of their belongings. After a few hours of anguish, are starting to disappear one by one. It does not take long for will realize that they have been the vícitimas of a trap set by locals, and its first worlders lives are at stake.To read the synopsis of tourists (2006) becomes evident why many her rated as a Hostel (2006) of the poor: both were in billboard (at least in the United States) more or less during the same period, and both saddled with a fairly similar initial situation: tourists from the first world in strange lands and, suddenly, it face to locals for its survival. However, despite the fact that they share a same premise and, in some ways, the same "message", the truth is that the two films are very different. While the Eli Roth film wallows in a horrifying "Theatric" more typical of a horror of the whole film life, tourists points more towards a realistic sample that best expresses the verisimilitude of your scenario. Not always succeeds, but almost.And it is that for me, at least, the greatest achievement of the film lies in those sequences that can feel the real situation. During the first half hour was a bright and spacious natural paradise where you can access all kinds of pleasures, becomes a desolate trap surrounded by an oppressive jungle. That piece in which the protagonists, stripped and dams of anguish, walk the streets of a village Brazilian plunged into misery follows an immensely real flavor. What is a decoration nor a set; the people through which passes the camera is real by %, as it is the people inhabiting it. Provide or not a good, bad image or real of the gentilicio of Brazil doesn't really matter: the fear of everything that is not "our home" is perfectly embodied.Unfortunately the tape is not always maintained in these paths. Those passages in which abandons his realism aren't very interesting. The villain of the story, for example, is so bad that it becomes cartoonish, and even has a (completely absurd and surplus) scene in which punishes one of his henchmen and he delves into the grounds of the supervillanía of the comic. On the other hand, the final sequence of the underwater persecution, if well very effective and claustrophobic, not seems to be very in tune with the rest of the tape, although I acknowledge that worked out particularly well with me.What wants to tourists is very clear: show a moral fable of retribution on the meat of those "predators" of the first world that, although innocent, receive theirs by the outside world that have used for decades. This point her certainly matches with Hostel, only that here the moral is too explicit and on top of that is literally explained in the main and most unpleasant scene of offal of the footage. It also shows which is why they have to kidnap the young visitors, one I daresay not here although you can easily guess from the beginning. But despite all these flaws, we talk about a highly recommended tape. It is not nowhere near a movie without bugs (its aesthetic, as I noted then, is sometimes inconsistent, and the reactions of certain characters are by little credible moments), but has very successful sequences that make it a respectable entry into this sub-genre of "dead tourists", bringing it beyond the typical and hackneyed story of psychopaths preying young innocent and unsuspecting. In the end, is appreciated some originality in these times in which this kind of movies are produced like hotcakes for the "enjoyment" of the staff.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1730

Enrique Colmena

Tara Road

muchocine

Do pleasant to see almost always, is a comforting though perhaps film too pacatus in its approach, reminiscent of bursts of a recently made movie? in the manner of the BBC?.

Sometimes not understood why some movies, with all ballots to enjoy an acceptable commercial career, staying on the shelves of the distributors. It is the case of this "Tara Road", a film that, without being nothing another Thursday, it is clear that may interest to a particular audience, mostly middle-aged or even something more, because it raises issues that are close to them, and is also served by a handful of known actors (MacDowell, Rea, Olivia Williams of "The sixth sense"). However, has taken two years to reach the Spanish screens, when any anti-commercialism bullshit (and without artistic value, is understood) opens on time. The film of the Scottish Gilles MacKinnon, shot in Ireland and United States with not only Irish performers and Yankees, but also Germans (Jean-Marc Barr), it raises in a mixture which is not, fortunately, be the usual macedonia decaffeinated with bits and pieces from different parts of Europe which all too often perpetrated on our continent. The plot revolves around two dramas: one, the terrifying, absolute tragedy of the death of the only teenage son in a well-placed Yankee family; the other, the trauma of separation, prior adultery and even stem out of wedlock, of an Irish couple in theory all happiness. Of these tragedies "tour de force" part of the film, the exchange of houses between the two affected, allowing them to rediscover themselves in a few environments so different from his usual, assuming that exchange more than a mere change of Habitat: also oxygenates their lives and gives them something so live. Nice to see almost always, is a comforting though perhaps film too pacatus in its approach, that reminds bursts of a recently made movie "in the manner of the BBC".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/984

Silvia

En la ciudad

muchocine

In the city is the story of how little that sometimes we know although we convivamos together: how us deceive ourselves about our lives and how to deceive others to make our lives a little easier or just pride.

Barcelona. A big city that hides a multitude of small stories. In this urban scenario, a group of friends open us the doors of their homes and their lives to leave us to witness what happens to them in their day to day. Characters that silent much more than what they say. Characters that show much less than hide. It is the story of one group of thirtysomethings friends who are daily, share all their experiences but that hide an important part of their lives: their most private feelings. Only the viewer will be witness of everything: their lies, secrets, hidden desires and infidelities.Eduard Fernández (member of the cast of Alatriste) - and that won Goya Award as best supporting actor for his role in this film - embodies the character of Mario, a tormented type who suspects that his wife, Sara, (Vicenta N?)(Dongo) tricks and who will fight throughout the film to try to confirm your doubts.Irene (Monica López) shows an attitude of rejection and avoids seeing her friend of faculty that is reunited after years without being. Their marriage does not work while her husband Manu (beloved Chisco) constantly strive to satisfy their desire.Tomás (Alex Brendemünl) also hides something: its relationship with a minor, which on top of that is the niece of his friend Mario. And finally, Sofia (María Pujalte) dam of a relationship with a Frenchman whose posturing tries to constantly justify against the demáspor not be like a spiteful.The story full of deceptions reminds Tapas, although in the latter drama is disguised as comedy in an attempt to downplay the issue. In the city is the story of how little that sometimes we know although we convivamos together: how us deceive ourselves about our lives and how to deceive others to make our lives a little easier or just pride. Easy to empathize with these characters because, at the end and all, as como dice says one of the protagonists: "we all have secrets, huh?".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/719

José A. Peig

Un buen año

muchocine

Here is heard, from beginning to end, gnashing of predictable, trite, rehash, topical, schematic, plumbous. A very simple story with some very simple resources.

The truth is that it is irritating - but that irritating muuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuy - spend two hours watching as harmless as this product. I say harmless because implicit and explicit you intend to claim certain things and wants to communicate a well-intentioned message, and hence put the stop by Mannerist of the matter. Often smell. Or often pile of shit, should I write with knife fingers instead of the calm tapping with which I am about to comment on the last film by Ridley Scott (I think is the same that made the incredible "Alien", the very interesting "the Duelists" or the "Blade Runner" classic, but I'm no longer sure of anything). Let the truisms and move on to something else, butterfly, it looks that has milk the affair.Story about a materialistic banker (man, clear). History on a child cuatro-ojos with an air of gilipollas integral (because what are educating the sacred rules of competitiveness, will not take all the blame and leave a margin for its pristine innocence) that it reaches adult and turns into a consolidated comprehensive asshole (I do not mean with bad faith, I simplifico a little things to go more quickly). They spend a few quarters of an hour, will occur a few graciosillas things, a little league, takes any reprimand, relive his childhood, has a moment of doubt, just the movie and integral asshole remains asshole integral but not so much. Gets a bit of the fold with risk to stay out forever (because the good aunt that has been caught not for less, go) and see the other girl taking a bath of grapes.Sometimes, in cinema it is possible to make a good movie with a script or a schema of ideas is summarized in three sentences, but here is heard, from beginning to end, gnashing of predictable, trite, rehash, topical, schematic, plumbous. A very simple story with some very simple resources. We have a character that goes from a point A to a point B, but apart from that the Viewer already knows the end (because it is a story that have told us the million times), the character not runs on its own, but that he is trapped in his predictable cliché. There is no progression, there is the more minimal ability to make credible the character played by Russell Crowe can choose the other option. Because it is a character, as I have said, without life, without this dimension of the human real. This doesn't cause both a bad script, but the same idea which part: Mannerist, giving and predictable. And if level script not to throw rockets, because there is no where cogerla.¿Hay subtlety?. No there is dramatic force in the "transition" from the central character?. No (or not many). Is a comedy of manners with "bodacious" which exercise aperspectivista from a pattern of crystalline and smooth realism? No. (I hear chuckle) photography, staging, the music, they provide some enjoyable time (and the assholes that salen.brrrrrrrrwww). There who want to save her attending these technical aspects (and testosterónicos), as they have done with the futuristic truño of Alfonso Cuarón, but where no there, there. It is sad that even large makers are falling into the same garbage. Or will they were right that, already for quite some time, say that Ridley Scott is and has always been a bluff. What desire I have revise Blade Runner.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3858

Heitor Pan

Lejos de ella

muchocine

Sarah Polley performed a reading of the feelings of a couple who leads a life sharing their stocks when they are forced to take drastic action when Alzheimer's disease began to take their toll in the memories of her.

How much would be willing to sacrifice for love? And I do not speak of that youthful, passionate and torn love one experiences in the early stages of adulthood, but leisurely, secure and complete love rarely found to spend more than half a lifetime with a person. The time in which the company of the other is needed, in which the silences are comfortable and comfortable with the idea that one of the two disappear escuece strongly in much deeper from the bowels. That time in which risky Follies have moved to better life and that the best plan for an afternoon is to listen to the voice of the couple reading thousand times read, under a blanket, while you think about the present and forget the future.Probably all to check the same box of the test. If somebody manages to find this kind of relationship, I would be willing to sacrifice everything for the sake of the other half. But and if that sacrifice is risking to be forgotten? Do and if the best for one or one who love passes away of oneself? And if the happiness of your companion is the bitter unhappiness of oneself?Sarah Polley, superb actress and usual in filmographies as Isabel Coixet or Atom Egoyan, performed a reading of the feelings of a couple who leads a life sharing their stocks when they are forced to take drastic action. Alzheimer's disease began to take their toll on memories of Fiona, and although it takes a rapid awareness of the situation and tries to live with his ailing memory, there comes a time when the situation becomes complicated and dangerous. It is at that moment when she takes the determination of entering a specialized residency, trying to save his partner of a load of lifetime.Grant, her husband, is not at all in agreement and, although I would prefer be he who loved his wife, cannot be denied to their wishes. The problem arises when the rules of residence forcing the patient to stay 30 days without receiving visits for a correct adaptation to the new life. How many memories is able to erase the disease in that period of time?The story then focuses on how Grant faces this new stage of your life. Feelings of loneliness and sadness of a man with a calm character, struggling to hold on to his media naranja to memories that share. In the sacrifice which is prepared to carry out by the happiness of his wife. In the sense of guilt that lurks to errors that could commit into a relationship of more than half a lifetime.At times the plot lapses and narration slows down becoming slightly tedious, perhaps by the fact that the story is based on a short story that Polley, also responsible for the screenplay fails to expand uniformly, or perhaps due to the shortcomings that often assumed an opera prima. However, these moments of downturn are compensated with incredible force, which beat the viewer in the middle of the chest without tear gas tricks or scenes with excess sugar.These moments of great emotional intensity, they are thanks to the two main, immense actors in the construction of two extremely human characters, with strong and defined personalities that lead the story in natural and paused. Julie Christie and Gordon Pinsent are the best of a debut which shows that Sarah Polley has enough charisma and sensitivity to expect of it an interesting evolution behind the camera.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2250

Bruji

Carta a tres esposas

muchocine

What is really surprising in the narration of the different stories, drawn perpendicular, is the vision which casts on the enigmatic central character and the refusal by Mankiewicz to explicitly deal with infidelity.

"Dear Debby, Lora Mae and Rita..."Following the advice of Louis Mayer, Joseph l. Mankiewicz "gateó much before starting to walk". Which means that, before heading, he did important work of production for the Metro, and became entrenched as one of the best writers of the 1930s, cultivating all genres and stressing as dialoguista. The prestigious "crawling" earned him the recognition of the Hollywood of the era, earning a nomination to the Oscar as a producer of George Cukor Philadelphia stories and another for the Skippy script in 1931. his first film after the cameras, the castle of Dragonwyck, arrives in 1.946 ill the ironic, delicate, elegant and subtle Erns Lubitsch; starting with her a meteoric and successful career which turns him into the essential filmmaker that never conceived a good movie without the livelihood of a solid story. Their own words: "the difference between real life and the movies is that a script has to make sense." "Life not".Sense, irony, sarcasm, humour and charm come together in this delicious comedy of 1949, which obtained its first two Oscars (screenplay and direction). Then come titles mythical in the history of cinema, as the nude Eve (won other two statuettes), the Countess barefoot or the footprint, its last footage.In a letter to three wives, adaptation of a short story by John Klempner, the authors contemporaries, - committed to incorporate voices in off in their films, find a masterful lesson on how to apply them. As it can be seen from this excellent reference, this, basically, is limited to the introduction of scenes, by channeling the argument and defining the backstory of the characters. At any time the omnipresent narration competes with images or subtract them protagonism. Know how to intervene and, above all, when not doing so. Its mission is complete, never interrupt or lead. Without a doubt, the balance did not reach the acclaimed Todd Field to spoil the games Secretos.Otro of the greatest attractions of this film adaptation lies in the successful use of the flashback, used by the demands emanating from the own script. According to the novel, Addie Rose do not attend the annual picnic of charity, failing her three best friends. Failing that, it makes them get a farewell letter, which, Furthermore, informs you that it has escaped with the husband of one of them!. The three protagonists recall their marital lives in order to find out the terrible truth: with what?. Another extraordinary film lesson that justifies the choice of a particular technique for needs resulting from the production, not by the mere whim to do so; attitude very taste of current Directors.On the other hand, the roster of actors than the most optimistic expectations. Linda Darnell expressions are memorable; the apparent frivolity of Jeanne Crain, plausible; and the interpretation of Ann Sothern, embodying the prototypical American worker at the end of the 1940s, unbeatable. Meanwhile, the male replica is not expected, being represented by the cautious and accurate work of Jeffrey Lynn, magnificent debut of Paul Douglas and the invaluable stage presence of the unspeakably good Kirk.El master touch is rounded up with some frames which oblige love cinema (the glances that direct the three wives to the phone booth as the ship moves away), with implausible situations designed to provoke laughter from the most demanding Viewer (starring the radio sponsors unusual dinner), scenes equipped with a touching dramatic load (the desperate monologue that shows the transformation of Debby), an impressive photography in black and white that diffuses smoke cigarettes, a retailer and mimosa art direction and the exquisite dialoguesimpossible and unthinkable in any recent film.But what really surprised in the narration of the different stories, drawn perpendicular, perhaps, is the vision which casts on the enigmatic central character and the refusal by Mankiewicz to explicitly deal with infidelity. About as significant as easy to explain aspects. We must only think that Addie is nothing more than the touch of care requiring the asleep loves the illusion that prevents the sentimental apathy. Something that, ignoring the warning will be heard at the beginning, which clearly has much to do with me... or with you.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2534

Alvaro Oliva

Shrek Tercero

muchocine

The originality and freshness that meant?Shrek? We are left in a very distant place with regard to this third installment.

"Again we get the friendly green OGRE wrapped in another adventure surrounded by his entourage, consisting of ass and cat with boots.""Shrek the third" low level reached with previous proposals, the story suffers some ups and downs resented the overall structure, but even so, Chris Miller shows very interesting parts, such as recruitment by charming in the tavern of the "stripped", or bad very bad of classic tales, or its presentation as a café theatre actor. The dream of Shrek becoming father, the subplot of donkey and puss in boots, the deathbed of the King, and some other sequences make approaching up the rooms to see this film not in vain, but the more demanding will feel a bit disappointed with this adventure.The effects are still roaring, managing to create some very good kingdoms, and some put into scenes by way of Theatre (final Act) very achieved, so in that aspect encandilarán viewers.The soundtrack this formed by Harry Gregson-Williams songs composed for the occasion, as well as a number of songs which complement this work.Ultimately, the originality and freshness was "Shrek" we have a very distant place with regard to this third installment.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3798

Heitor Pan

The Nanny Diaries (Diario de una Niñera)

muchocine

A study of the customs of the upper-class New Yorker serving principals to dissect a family where not working mothers are unable to take time for a child that grows in the arms of the nannies.

I believed that I was going to see a romantic comedy and is that no, advertisers, the creators of trailers or my own prejudices, I had cheated. Everything seemed that he wore until the genre: Scarlett Johansson in his most lovable version, cares for the child of a wealthy family while he falls in love with the good guy on duty, in this case Chris Evans, the human torch of "fantastic four". All this out of a novel usamericana written by females, the type of which parieron to Bridget Jones and the protagonists of "sex in New York". But all this was going a little further. Perhaps not too, but it is enough to have "A nanny diaries" more into account than in principle thought.Annie Braddock just graduating in anthropology and about to dive into the world of work, it is somewhat lost. His mother pushes her to you to succeed in life and become a woman powerful and self-sufficient, without making the mistakes that she has been able to fall and this is to abandon the utopian idea of anthropology and entering the business world.By chance Annie is an easy road, that passes by postponing any drastic decision about their future while performs a job easy and very well-paid, the nanny for one of the shoots of the typical wealthy family of the Upper East Side. So begins a study of the customs of the upper class New York serving the directors Shari Springer Berman and Robert Pulcini to dissect a family (it seems that) typical in these environments, with no working mothers who are unable to take time for a child that grows in the arms of the babysitter, while trying to please a husband that divides their interests between absorbent work and the lovers who are falling by the way.So the film is flowing between the situation comedy and family drama, aided by a few actors in absolute State of grace. Paul Giamatti and Laura Linney embody precisely this couple desencantada with life, which lives in the face of the Gallery, discusses cries at home while it exhibits the perfect smile at parties of society and becomes completely from a child with obvious emotional shortcomings. Linney outboard to the cool, elegant and neurotic Madam X and Paul Giamatti comes to be much more scary than many psychopaths of axe in hand in the role of Mr X, a cynical, distant and paid type of himself. Incredible camaleónica ability of this actor, which is revealing steady as one of the best side in recent times.Resultonas and comic scenes are alternating with social denunciation of this aseptically so that only the usamericanos are capable of achieving. Both the protagonist, a Scarlett Johansson that moves well in almost any environment, like the rest of side, read the aforementioned Chris Evans, singer Alicia Keys or the Donna Murphy television carry out their duties, making that the outcome will be very entertaining to perfection.So the film passes without a single but until the end, where the strange gland prevents American filmmakers finish off an argument with a bittersweet ending, returns to act. Walt Disney syndrome strikes again and it seems that the Yankee Viewer will suffer severe seizures if a movie left some storyline without his desired happy ending or if in a movie of science fiction or intrigue left something without explaining. So, finally, everyone learns the lesson and the lives of all pass by much more yellow tiles than when they started.Pity that they do not apply this to reality.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2031

JLO

Alejandro Magno

muchocine

He was accused of too long when the short life of the conqueror would give, at least, for a miniseries.

All features always vital Oliver Stone film are delineated in the monumental - in every sense - Alexander the great (only Alexander in the original). That Yes, it is a "anesthetized" Stone. The camera nervous and self-centered that characterizes his style and praising "smaller" films but valuable as killers by nature and way without return, conspicuous by their absence.Alexander is a logical choice for an adept filmmaker to the great biopics: JFK, Nixon, The Doors, Larry Flynt, Commander. If we add to these filmic dating others of the value of platoon and born on July 4, the rejection that generates your film becomes incomprehensible critical. Grandiose? Pedantic? It is not the film that same?It begins in the 323 before Christ, telling the life of the Conqueror of 90% of the then known world. Historians say that Alexander was so great, that the conquests of Julius Caesar or a Napoleón are reduced to "a short walk in the Park". Reading makes Stone is historically correct, but in appearance, is done without passion. They are unusual sensitivity to the time of Alexander and his excessive ambition, but not his gift of command and its animal ferocity. The battles are bland, dull and unclear, seem to be a mere pretext that fail to save a very good montage. American critique her shattered unjustifiable - leaving aside the policy by Oliver on Fidel Castro - still fresh documentary reasons. He was accused of too long when the short life of the conqueror would give, at least, for a miniseries. The voiceover of the Hopkins character is needed by the amount of events narrated, if not everything would lose clarity. I will not refer to the problematic homosexual so much commotion caused in the North, because it would delay twenty years. Beyond them. Of course it has faults. Olympia (does Jolie Farrel MOM?) never aging, the music of Vangelis is unbearable by the cheesy and by highlight "serious" scenes, Val Kilmer seems a whim of the director (what weighs?), the film loses strength at the end and we arrived at his big, big mistake: Alexander is a character too big for the three gestures of Colin Farrel.El human profile of the hero, the scene of his wound next to his horse and an elephant, the inclusion at the wrong time of the death of his father, his photography and visual richness, rescued Alexander of mediocrity and her located in an imaginary space defined by Spartacus in its roof, but higher than the contemporary and subvaloradas Troy, Gladiator and 300.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3285

José A. Peig

Stardust

muchocine

We have the happy moment of discovering a little gem that stands out from the thriving mediocrity that has prevailed in the most recent fantasy film.

Stardust proposes a fiction that develops halfway between two worlds, and plays with the viewer through the ruse of crossing genres and tones. Stardust is a libérrima joke of evasion; the mode when it starts (a decrease from the stars) and sequence with which completed the story (an upgrade to the same sidereal space), and taking into account the profiles and the variables that define the crux of the narrative, we have a sample of how the fantasy film argues in its own laws, where anything goes and everything is credible always and when the creators of the work in question have been able to form a coherent idea in what refers to the tone and meaning. Stardust is one of these pieces need not be justified nor develop an argument with hairs and signals so that the viewer can enter in the game. It is, in itself, a game of imagination in the service of the Viewer.Film in Bruges, Princes and princesses, sword, magic, strange beings, happy ending. With these ingredients, the logical thing is to come up with a bland and predictable product. If we attend a basic rule in the art of narration, it teaches us that always we dip ingredients common to a model or subgenre, but importantly recombinarlos and build profiles with the pulse of the creator, who returns to the archetypal land to raise his wand and leave there a singular impression. It may be a failed film Stardust, you notice that it could have been much more versatile in all its parts, but we have the happy moment of discovering a little gem that stands out from the thriving mediocrity that has prevailed in the most recent fantasy film.As we have already said, the story is not original, but Matthew Vaughn film has two very important virtues: the construction of characters, even being planted on a stereotype, these have their own personality and possess adequate at its end aesthetic and playful freshness. The narrative is surprisingly agile, takes full advantage of the elements of healthy comedy and irony to build relations between characters, situations and the varied elements of visual, but careful imagery, Yes, at least, quite concise, tailored to the needs of the story, regardless - in general terms - habitual abuse of special effects. This blend of fantasy, love, irony and satire, works and also manages to escape with solvency aimed towards the sentimental scenes: where it is approaching the danger of falling into "cakes" field, the script and structure save the moment with the extravagant gesture of some of his landscapes or funniest characters. To highlight the Robert de Niro and Michelle Pfeiffer, which look a histrionics that, in this case, fits perfectly with the overall tone of the work. In fact, we could define Stardust as a histrionic fantasy style with right themselves.Your main problem is excess footage, another usual ballast in productions of the style. In the background appear characters, passages and dispensable dialogues, that do that - especially in ecuador of the narration - the dominant fluidity lost in dramatic depth and then is when the story is dispersed unnecessarily. Fortunately, in the last stretch recovery pulse, with a hilarious final duel. And, finally, despite being a product quite "sui generis", is as delicious as the traditional fairy tale, while delivering his strangeness without that is heard to clench the pretentious attempt. Pure sympathy and conviviality.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1942

Jose Contreras

Tu la letra, yo la música

muchocine

A film like this not should have been dubbed. Perhaps even should have been exported. I've seen in Spanish and it just works.

Hugh Grant plays a star of the pop fall in disgrace. The actor lacks little to put a face to that ineffable thing that Oscar Wilde wanted to catch in their sentences, the charm ("It is absurd to divide people into good and bad.") ("People are either charming or tedious.") Drew Barrimore makes dead woolly. Since the left dress faralai helpless aliens has specialized in the role of neurotic girl that is so easy to take care.I understand that we tired a bit pedantic commentator that recommends us to see the film in English, when what they want is not that we see it in English but we know that he knows English. But it is that a film like this not should have been dubbed. Perhaps even should have been exported. I've seen in Spanish and it just works. The singer and the regadora of plants have five days to compose a song, and nothing else in the world than a les. Things are little by little known, and every detail is adding in a small crimping to the lyrics of the song. What is between them has to do with its past, but also with this poem. For this reason, when they begin to launch the same in the Spanish version, the Viewer cannot otherwise shy away. And when Hugh Grant sings his song one can not be thrill with the verse: "I love you despised the fact, that you? ve killed all of my plants," because hardly has time to read in passing under the leg of the piano.I would like to explain me with this rodeo criticism, a little harsh I read everywhere. The film is not worse than other fun of Hugh Grant comedy "Big kid" or "Notting Hill" for example. The film is intended as a climax that the characters come after Polish verses. The viewer of a dubbed copy sees them reach that moment like a pair of automatons who must comply with the producer, and give a kiss to hastily before the fall of the iron curtain.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2793

Rafa Ferrer

Uno para todas

muchocine

Attempts to, in some way have certain doses of drama, but they become a little muggy, and it seems that at times the misfortunes seem Prime is (and that way) with the protagonists, without separating summer fresh comedieta drama.

On the desktop of the channel + I found this comedy (one more), light, starring a cast of actresses quasi unknown and where especially noted the presence of America Ferrera fashionable in USA now for the adaptation of "Betty la fea" and hit the jump to the movies with "truth women have curves".The argument and its approach is curious, although note too its transfer of novel to screenplay, indeed, that this kind of books of "separate stories" and that both like girls, here materializes in a bland movie but a "handful" of $ giving rise to a sequel with almost the same cast which grossed at the box office.Attempts to, in some way have certain doses of drama, but become a little muggy, and although in all the houses are cooked beans, or, rather, problems have all, here it seems that at some moments the misfortunes seem Prime is (and that way) with the protagonists, without separating summer fresh comedieta drama.In short, although there are who branded it's 8th wonder of the world, to my found me "one of many" forgettable film style.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4319

Ethan

Ha nacido una estrella

muchocine

Does the director chains a wonderful travelling of round-trip with the impressive number?The Man That Got Away?, where Judy Garland sings with a torrent of voice and gets to the highest point of his career.

"Never second parts were good." That at least they say for films that are sequels or remakes. Let's talk about an exception that proves the rule; Let's talk about "A star is born" George Cukor. It's a based tape in which he made - and wrote, William a. Wellman in 1937. He narrated the story of Norman Maine, an actor in decline and alcoholic who discovered Vicki Lester, a young promise that later married (Fredric March and Janet Gaynor in the original movie, James Mason and Judy Garland in which concerns us); everything is twisted when Norman's career was coming to an end and had no choice but to get used to be the shadow of Vicki. That film seemed difficult to overcome, given the success and the numerous awards garnered, however, seventeen years later, producer Sydney Luft tried a new project designed to relaunch the career of his wife; the career of Judy Garland. Although this objective failed - due to other factors - the end result was excellent and we can now say that it is one of the best films in the history. And all thanks to its director. George Cukor was facing his first musical and also had to perform in the new Cinemascope. Both challenges them resolved with note not only because of its known ability to the direction of actors and actresses-, but also for the perfect handling of the camera and the excellent inclusion in the plot of the musical numbers. Sequences as the second encounter between Norman and Vicki are an example of the personal form was Cukor understand the film. The director chains a scene in a night club - a wonderful travelling of round-trip with James Mason searching for actress and smoking as a locomotive, with the impressive number "The Man That Got Away", where Judy Garland sings with a torrent of voice and manages to get - in the opinion of many, to the highest point of his career. Wherever I see "Has born a star" term thinking same thing: "It is curious what it resembles Cukor Minnelli". It is that there are many elements in this film resemble the best Vincente Minnelli, and I don't mean only the use of the color red or the brilliance of the choreography and the decorations, but the use of the script speculate; the method of "narrating dancing"; and psychological treatment of the characters. In the number "Born in a Trunk", Vicki sees herself in a film as the protagonist of a film where he sings and dances to tell the story of his life. It is the film within the film, but it is also a new form of narration. The sequence follows very closely the modern style that began with the final ballet of "An American in Paris" ("An American in Paris" of Vincente Minnelli, 1951). However, in the number "Someone at Last", Cukor reaches further than Minnelli. Here Judy Garland uses lamps, plants, tables and other objects of the Hall of his house to represent an imaginary journey where moves from Paris to Brazil passing through China. The denunciation of the environment that gives them eat also is another point in common between the two directors. For Vicki day in large studies can not be more frustrating: nobody seems to care her face - in fact, in his first role insist that do not see you the face-; It is lost between sets and screens where all kinds of films are planned or are trapped--literally--by the system when it is entangled in a kind of revolving door. The symbolism of this type is continuous in the footage, but it is also the similarity or cross-checking with real-life. Thus, the personal situation at the Judy Garland - consumed by drugs - time seemed too close to Norman Maine in fiction or, if see him otherwise, that Judy embodies a young woman who began her career crashes too with the fact that this film was the last of the actress as a protagonist, with success among critics and public. The last one, Yes, but also the best.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2563

El mágico

Cocalero

muchocine

At the beginning, "Grower" seems one documentary... But with the evolution of the course we give account that Landes managed to capture something historic: the coming to power of a common subject, outside of the traditional Bolivian aristocratic stablishment.

In general, while I see documentaries, I try, or avoid commenting on the blog, simply because they do not in general have massive and people seek primarily to the film as a refuge to entertain. Costs, therefore, if they are not familiar with the genre to make time to see documentaries, even up to me, I see a few cost me! On that basis, you will wonder, after such introduction. For what to read criticism of "Grower"? It seems to me that this proposal of Alejandro Landes is more than a classic documentary. Landes is writer, born in Brazil, raised in Ecuador and graduate in the U.S., a restless spirit that after participating in the production of "Oppenheimer presents" (the American TV show) decided to follow the last months prior to national elections in Bolivia, where competing with serious chances of victory a singular character. "Grower" is, then, a tour about the rise to power of Bolivian President Evo Morales. Landes accompanies portable camera in hand, to Evo in multiple places in your country in political acts, intimacy with their colleagues and friends, in the heavy fighting with the right and the military in each media exposure. At the beginning, "Grower" seems one documentary. But with the evolution of the course we give account that Landes managed to capture something historic: the arrival to power of a common subject, outside the Bolivian traditional aristocratic stablishment and popular phenomenon that was for that people achieve this fact. From the point of view of the edition of the tour, it is full of funny moments, (wit that makes Evo leadership military on respect for the hierarchies is anthological especially in the context in which da!), offers many spaces for rest and reflection (comments from the candidate to Senator alternate slope of Morales are very interesting) and there are clear enough in the picture showing the society. Perhaps Landes not implied at the time in which accompanies Evo that his material would have a momentous and historic value by the conjuncture encountering, but the truth is that this proposal contains many elements of interest that bring it to be a more massive than others traditional product of the genre. Beyond of your political ideology, "Grower" attempts to plot the moment prior to the consecration of a popular leader, but not just any leader, but a citizen of aymara origin Socialist arriving for the first time in the history of Latin America President supporting values of integration and respect for the pluraridades that exist in their land and with the hefty task reintegrate Bolivia to a framework of economic stability that urgently needed. By Landes (who now resides in Buenos Aires), very intelligent people of Hoyts by including it in its programming (had much impact on the BAFICI of this year) and congratulations people of INCAA Tita Merello by its new projection equipment (not know him) and the image quality with which plays in an acceptable size copy DVD which had. A very interesting product to learn more about political roots and brotherhood, "Coca", great debut of Landes.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3718

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Next

muchocine

There is no way possible term, there is no bondado; one of the most demoledoramente "bad" movies this chronicler of his vices could be seen in their few years of cinematic experience. Are you clear?

Being rigorous, Next lays some of the more harmful vices that plague the current cinema or, moving away for once defeatist tone that will substantiate this Misty review, film checked into the Hollywood and prevented in the company of sweeping to victory at box office, contribute little or nothing to the memory of any moderately intelligent film lover and above allEnter the market of the DVD so much or more than the proceeds in movie theaters. I do not know the cause and maybe me not strive too much in search for her, but strikes me as very complicated task to write about what amazes me and me trying to pleasure (write about the pure Excellence) and instead, I go the fingers as nerve lizards when I touch (today is the pleasant day) heaping abuse on a product of obvious or already direct and nauseabundamente bad mediocrity. Infected by all possible evils and any more than my NAP Wednesday laziness makes me not reach now, Next plays with the advantage of not be breaking any cultural law, but should skirt the crime and the case that in the future some public quality inspection agency (CPI, ja) Decides to veto or warning on the cover of the terrible evil that can cause your consumptionNext is the formidable Golden Palm of absolute chaos and the bear of platinum in terms of annihilation of everything that smacks of simplicity, clairvoyance, quality, in short, those things that make life journeys through most soft paths and all us put hair on end and the soul assertive when we see nice things on a screen. The like, common sense and beauty, abstract concepts absent in this embarrassing hodgepodge as an anal intercourse in a farce of the brothers Alvarez Quintero.Podemos to fine-tune the configuration of the Colt of linguistic torture by recourse to a topic or two hundred, but for once it will be a topic (or 200) convenient: our friend Nicolas Cage is already-fondón, can spare you four films per year and that of young and still has reaños and capacity to lift flight and redirect a career that has had interesting moments (Leaving Las Vegas) or even any indisimuladamente good (Adaptation). You lack the man a role which redeems it, but will cost much erase our memory, so sweet, so bombastic when wants to, disasters motorized with burning skull or fortune-tellers to trial as the here of clumsy and dimwitted portrait.Next despreocupa of narrative coherence and attends a very laughable argument, so fragilísimo without blushing and mild, so to bad post, one thinks, armed with a bag of good intentions, that Lee Tamahori (Warriors of yore, his best film); Mulholland Falls, the Brigade of the hat, on the good side and XXX: State of emergency or in disaster muladar) wished with all his neozelandesas forces fall as low enough as to take off there and do something decent. Ah, the height of the blunder is to leave my beloved Julianne Moore. There already unraveled me all the purposes of Temperance and I thought seriously not expose me too much, give death certificate and not to attend a function of such vilification. Everything is by the good times that has given me this wonderful actress, also - like many - casualty of this worldly Vice which are the bitches and the stable job.Next is not even bad by itself, but that precise pecados ajenos contest to formulate the already muscular his own. The diviner who sees the near future (two absurd minutes of precognition) persists in not being a hero to the use and recites adages of zen transcendence for Buttering- and carried halfway the cot - compulsory Lady, which do not need us to emphasise that it is concupiscible moza, carita mona and more dazed in the roll of film as a seminarian in a bang gang at Cannes (Jessica Biel). It must be difficult to make the gallant you around, while sticky and delicate, attentive and overflowing in mimes, a magician of supernatural powers in whose hand is to save the world (us included) or - let me semantic excess - send everything to the Holy shit. Parentheses: I have to open my page - neglected lately — a corner in which you click the worst films of the history of cinema: the efforts made and turned into pure churro.Next (still digging) has already submitted credentials and it is postulated in all nominations more grenades. The spectacle of the cinema - noble art, noble art - has taken this intriguing path: becomes disgusted to serious industry and embraces with freshness of brothel to the occasionally decent mercantislismo disguised as art, adult or teen entertainment, delivering a generous dose of tedium. You could have written a brief authorities bla bla warn of the dangers associated with the consumption of this product., but it can not go one hand and just as well. The video shops live, after all, this: of trash, of remnants of palomitero balance which only shows the progress of technology and the quality of the new TVs, with its colorínes and its assorted pack of connections. I, at the time, I'm thinking about my self-esteem, I open wide the Windows of the chest and leave out the demon of masochism. He sneaks and has been remoloneando by my soul since I started to face such nonsense. Go, bastard

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2826

Robgordon

Death Proof

muchocine

A fabulous closure for this carousel of damaged reels, veneration of extinct genera, cachondeo, winks and intentional failure of continuity, comprising "Grindhouse" with "Planet Terror"

There are several films in "Death Proof", a film that Tarantino appears to have felt like a fish in water, giving rein to their more sickly fixations, its high level of fetish and the constants of his film.On the one hand we find in "Death Proof" film of the Tarantino of always, which we all know. The rescuer Tarantino of myths of Hollywood that years ago were all, the man with an enviable ability to recover forgotten that music heard now, they sound wonderful, the enfant terrible of Hollywood who enjoys writing lengthy dialogues on unexpected topics.That Tarantino exists, and much, in this part of "Grindhouse". Girls are the protagonists of these dilated talks born from the mind of Quentin, and this is precisely how it starts the film with the endless figure of Sydney Tamiia Portier, Jordan Ladd (daughters of Sydney and Cheryl Ladd, respectively) and Vanessa Ferlito and similarly will begin the second block (with change of actors included) that, "Death Proof" is clearly divided.If the Viewer is capable of entering the game of those long dialogues on women and guns, sex, the movies of the 1970s or the cars, their enjoyment of "Death Proof" is garantizadísimo and shall be complete. Certainly, by moments, the extreme length of the verbiage tarantiniana around a table, can go to tire, but quiet, it will soon take action that will prevent with one blow, any mood of yawn.The overwhelming presence of Kurt Russell and his character, the "specialist" Mike, is another of the great successes of Tarantino, expert in casting and already recovered Travolta or Pam Grier on previous occasions. Let us not forget that the was the Carpenter Pliskeen of "1997"; "Rescue in New York", MacReady in Jack Burton "Blow to the Chinese small" or "Thing". All a myth of the 80, which now receives a role for its fair measure and for his gallery of glorious heroes and antiheros.In this work, full of easily recognizable elements for the follower of the director of "Pulp Fiction" and which is not, and following the line marked by the spirit of grindhouse, Tarantino is allowed the luxury of skillfully, mix between all its obsessions, a slasher and a very clear and declared homage to the cinema of the 1970sfull of car chases and doubles and film specialists, that made it possible. As two films in one, marked by the QuentinEn stretch of the slasher, Tarantino universe introduces the character of the "specialist Mike", recreates (recurring in his filmography) female feet, delights us with the careful selection of music, ranging from Jack Nitzsche to T-Rex, passing by The Coasters, (or perhaps not you has bitten the curiosity by the Group Dave Dee?)(Do, Dozy, Beaky, Mick & Tich, following the story of Pete Townsend tells Poitier?) and with another dance, the "Butterfly" for framing within his filmography. An atypical film with serial killer where the deadly weapon is a car and that closes with a comic dialogue between Michael Parks and James Parks, the two policemen Texans that already appeared in "Kill Bill" or "Open until dawn".In its next stretch, Tarantino passes to other paths. With its particular tribute to "point zero limit" and other setenteras genus tapes that Tarantino reverence. Here, pointed on the specialists of cinema and its current decline and its rise as a result of special effects, takes body, via Zoe Bell, actress specialist (and double for Uma Thurman in "Kill Bill") in that scene, the most colossal and the best ride of the film, in which women are placed at the height of "Stunt Mike". Rosario Dawson, Mary Elizabeth Winstead and Tracie Thorns accompany revenge, in which there is a long time (perhaps too much) dialogue around a table and for the sexual thoughts of the protagonists (very for "nenas"), but that will give way to a remarkable Chase.A fabulous closure for this carousel of damaged reels, veneration of extinct genera, cachondeo, winks and intentional failure of continuity, comprising "Grindhouse" with "Planet Terror". Two works (though conceived as a single) tremendously entertaining and few claims where reign the casqueria and the messing and offer an exercise in style, although it is not, at all, novel, are grateful for being rare these days.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3178

Kiko de España

Los Cronocrímenes

muchocine

It is a very risky Pirouette as effective, so terrifying as fun. Trapped in time, Memento, Twilight zone, Phillip k. Dick, Prime, Mad doctors, black comedy, eroticism and dry hosts. Everything you need.

Talent: set of faculties or both artistic and intellectual capacities. Person very intelligent or remarkable in any science or activity. Synonyms: reason, intellect, wit-Talentoso: has talent and ingenuity. Synonym: Nacho Vigalondo. Cronocrimenes (I put the tilde) is as effective, so terrifying as risky Pirouette as fun and the proposal more fresh and less "Spanish" in a long time seeking something that contestant or The Birthday also sought, a little refresh the patriotic picture.A man who accidentally travels to the past and meets itself. A naked girl in the middle of a forest. A strange indivuduo with the face covered by a pink bandage. A disturbing mansion on the slope of a hill. Pieces of an unpredictable puzzle that lead to an unusual form of crime. Who is the murderer? Who the victim?Sounds like a topicazo, but it is really difficult to talk about the film without gutting her, so I will just say that Karra Elejalde convinces me, amuses me and I moved (although this to a lesser extent, of course) as Hector and that loads without problem with the movie to their backs, despite take a long time according to his own words, to understand the story. No wonder!Could not win the jackpot, but best screenplay in the official section that it is up to this twisted story that could take place in a hypothetical Memento almost lands in Springfield and he is supported by the Fantastic Fest of Austin.Me seems that crush her would be a mistake because it plays in the same league as the piropeada Prime and with the same precarious means "the mathematicians" manages to a much more pleasant and honest workingand above all thanks to a fascinating, twisted approach with adequate doses of humor azabache marks the House to not enjoy.Perhaps at last I third loose throttle a bit, but I think that it is necessary.We hope that the expectation which has been created in Sitges open the doors to the national, more complicated than the international distribution. and that the remake. And these touches of giallo.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/13

Javier Moreno

Harry poter y el caliz de fuego

muchocine

Interesting adaptation of the novel by Rowling

No. This time I will use a film as a pretext to expose my ideas or thoughts not more insane/rational/foolish. This time, and I swear before the sacred Lovecraft Necronomicon, I will talk about the film itself (for the first time and hoping to not serve as precedent), although it's obvious that I prefer a movie make me reflect on any aspect that it is appointment. Maybe someday talk about everything which means the series of Rowling novels (walks that I have things to talk about) a less mythological perspective and more profound.Am assuming that I am a genuine fan of the books, I love them, find me the very best that has come in fantasy, with a main character really interesting and tormented at all levels by all its morphisms is implying. Delivery of the basis, as when adapting a book to the big screen, what interests me less is its possible fidelity or not (although it would be a real hypocritical if you deny that I it a damn). Birth of the basis, as what more I like to see in an adaptation, we see reflected in images which books I suggested with words.After these premises, indicated as a prelude, the adaptations of Columbus seemed quite interesting, in accordance with what the books tell and reflecting on images everything you enjoyed in each of the two volumes brought to the big screen by director only at home. Also I would like to indicate, that the third movie, directed by Alfonso Cuaron, albeit at technical level I found rather surprising (except for that anorexico werewolf), I ended up not convince, but it defrauded me a lot, because I did not see the spirit of the novel reflected on the screen. Rowling can tell he loves the movie and thousand things more, but if to my get me a cheque for 10 million of dollars on the table, I say if necessary that God exists by far to betray all the novel implied.With these brief reviews, and as stated, after the fiasco with Harry Potter and the prisoner of Azkaban, I have gone to the cinema, without any information (not wanted to feel me influenced to any level, nor predisposed to feel disappointed, nor predisposed to feel satisfied) to see the fourth film of the orphaned Wizard. Which I found in the movie?, well not much, what more me to surprised is a book of 650 pages, even having ignored certain passages, have been more correctly synthesized in 150 minutes of film, I found a director Mike Newell (Director among others of four weddings and a funeral, and a priori the least suitable for a movie like this), which managed to move the global idea that inspired the novel to 35 mm. Amazing without a doubt. Also I found with a few individuals represented in the previous movies the characters of the novels acting minimally, while Daniel Radcliffe has less talent than the spider which finding Moody launches the unforgivable curses. Long - inevitable - visual effect, absolutely appalling and excellent occasions (with particular reference to the Hungarian colacuerno), good narrative pace, and some scenes that required of more footage (especially the attack of the mortifagos, which with great left his entrance onstage, one wants much more). In the USA the film been qualified PG-13, in Spain PG-7. Well, it is true that it is very dark (something on the other part heir to the spirit of the novel - and I am repeating with the fucking spirit-), has "terrific" moments like the aforementioned appearance of the mortifagos in the quidditch World Cup and has funny moments. This is the movie, fans more radical Harry Potter will her love, the fans more purists repudiated, among the less radical there will be people that likes and another to which leave indifferent, and to not have read the novels because them seem entertaining. I, that being a follower of the books, prefer to place me in a term means, nor as incredible as I'm reading out there, nor as bad as it could be expected coming from the director that comes. An interesting film which in my view improves a lot fiasco Cuarón. all forms, in 20 years, we will see if the film saga of the London magician continues being remembered or be forgotten more absolute. It will be worth seeing it, if I can think fast... I am among those who think that films not aguantarán the passage of time as if will make it the novels.Finally, recommendations for the producers, the orden del fenix forget David Yates and contratad to Guillermo del Toro, for the half blood prince I yet by a Shane Carruth (director of Prime) and for the seventh book, even without having it read, Darren Aronofsky, which a time most claim the urgent release of The fountain, that server, since he saw Requiem for a dream, craving see this director's third masterpiece as destroyer.PS: If no Aronofsky, a Takashi Miike serious tremendous.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1693

Josini

Hannibal: El origen del mal

muchocine

The bad go accompanied to the cinema is not always you choose what you want to see. So this time went back to having to endure two hours (over these bad movies last always two hours) of mediocre and commercial success.

The bad go accompanied to the cinema is not always you choose what you want to see. So this time went back to having to endure two hours (over these bad movies last always two hours) of mediocre and commercial success.I think that they want to impose by law one minimum quota of European films in cinemas. Retailers argue against that would lead them to ruin, because roughly the European cinema does not more than seven percent of the benefits. Hollywood instead expressly makes the kind of movies that kids demand and therefore gives a lot of money. This is an obvious reality, and the consequence is that supposedly all those who love the cinema of quality, especially film buffs like me, we should rejoice.I am a very atypical spectator, I think. When I decide, I know what they'll see, and nobody I tima. Get it first sniffing in the history, and thus I see films whose subject I am interested in. I do not often choose films by actors or their archetypes. You do with Gary Cooper, but is dead (as everyone knows, Gary Cooper is in heaven). Secondly control a bit of managers who are good and those who are of the lot, it is very simple, the bad is I have no head for more than me marketinicen. In the third and last place, when cuando dudo I doubt I can pull criticism, always with a bit of care because the critics are also human and, as such, have their tastes, as well as their patterns in many cases.This simple methodology I've fought for example torrent and its sequels, movies that copied the reason for American success. And I have also enjoyed of Ridley Scott's Gladiator or Gungs of New York of Scorsese, proving that Hollywood can do good works if, the problems is that normally does not want to (will simply make a pigswill Burger that everyone eats).I believe in free competition of ideas, so it seems wrong this measure. I do not obstacles though they seem to have sense, job well done can go adding little by little and reverse the situation, you only need the intelligence of the Viewer. And of course, if you want the powerful to consumistas and not freethinkers, then give the public what it wants. Moreover, I believe that the public not to give him what he wants or what expected, but what you want to give. Only thus move a little thinking cells.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1278

Verolindapechocha

Déjà Vu

muchocine

Déjà vu is a film that can ignore. The story is nonsense with time travel impossible.

Déjà vu (2006) is a film that can ignore. The story is nonsense with time travel impossible. The film begins with a ferry crowded marine celebrating with their families the Mardi Gras. Suddenly, boom, exploited and killed almost all (another excellent idea for terrorists). Denzel Washington plays the agent assigned to the case. In the process of research, he discovers the corpse of a burnt woman, however, it does not belong to the explosion. More or less that falls for the corpse, strange as it sounds, all of course can be attributed to the title of the film. Finally, also by chance he discovers that another team of agents, led by a cachetonízimooo Val Kilmer has a time machine, which can record video the past, exactly 4 days and 6 hours ago, not more, not less, and only that. And thus begins to get more and more pastrula history, because Denzel of course wants to stop the terrorist (it is only one, not an organization, simply a crazy "Patriot" played by James Caviezel) and save the girl, changing the destination and the present. Yes are still interested in seeing the film to do so, but not stating that in EBC were not advised of a loose story where you look.Strange that good actors have accepted to participate in the project. Denzel, why do you did?Ah, to all this, the used scenario is New Orleans, as a sort of tribute to the victims of Hurricane Katrina, even many of the survivors of the disaster, participated in the production as extras.The director graciosito, Tony Scott, was sent to a pole that read: "Malcolm X, Jesus Christ, and Jim Morrison: Deja Vu." "How Can We Fail?"My opinión: Still, you failed:(

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2772

Kiko de España

Un buen día lo tiene cualquiera

muchocine

Alien tragicomedy that despite being full of vitality is more bitter than sweet and confirms that Santiago Lorenzo has an extraordinary talent without budgets and with an interesting script. Lorenzo returns to break my heart.

What good stories counter is Santiago Lorenzo! A decade after MOM is boba returns to theaters to tell us the story of two characters played by two serious candidates for the Goya: Arturo, a wretched who loses everything (brilliant Diego Martín) and Onofre (dazzling Juan Antonio Quintana), an old man who participates in the project "Second youth" and that for 40? monthly provides "a home" youth troop care minimum.The movie is an alien tragicomedy that is more bitter than sweet despite being full of vitality and confirms that Santiago Lorenzo has an extraordinary talent without budgets and with an interesting script and a handful of players in State of grace makes it possible to the miracle.I hope to not have to wait another ten years to see his third movie.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1193

Rafa Ferrer

Batman begins

muchocine

Highly recommended film for all the fans of bat man, that if not recommended to minors...

Difficult without a doubt is that Christopher Nolan films such as "Memento" on their backs and "Insomnia" both two masterpieces of contemporary cinema, make the new release (the 5th already) of the bat man a simplistic and mediocre film (miresen history of Daredevil, Elektra, The punisher or the worst of all.) (CATWOMAN).Nolan made a good film that delves into the youth of the hero of Gotham, a city less Gothic that which proposed us Burton in the first two Batman (the Schumacher step refer!)(Hala!), with an excellent roster of the actors, even though Bale take the lead and is "that gets" in the role of Bruce Wayne / Batman.En two hours and peak of projection gives time to all, to see the reasons why the young Wayne builds his life on the way to revenge the death of his parents and their true motivations, and as happens to be victim to executioner of all those who break the law in Gotham, his city.But, of course, all that glitters is not gold and yet there than other negative part, for example mounting fast action scenes, poorly coordinated and poorly focused, there is no detail and in the dark trying to hide the shortcomings of these, perhaps the only negative note.In short, a highly recommended film for all the fans of bat man, that if not recommended to minors.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1586

Nobody's perfect

Teresa, el cuerpo de Cristo

muchocine

Ray Loriga gets back behind the camera after ten years to give us a correct portrait of our more usual mystique. Portrait not excited and either adds nothing new.

Teresa, the body of Christ brings nothing new beyond show us a few bleeding sores more and carnal interpretation (and not both for the Episcopal Conference has been the cry in the sky? and never better said - as has done it) of love, here of the nun Teresa towards a God incarnated in the body of a Cristo-mancebo passion. Warning: who go with intention of seeing flesh, little goes to see - if anything Intuit - Paz Vega. Even so, the story of the adventures of this atypical nun of cradle, since enter as arrogant novice until he founded her own convent under the "old"rule is not tedious, even is entertaining at times. Moreover, Loriga tells us that Teresa de Cepeda y Ahumada was a woman in love with until the death of God, intelligent, rebel and campaigner, party, had visions and Bill. While it is true that this last is more surprising, these are all things that we already knew of the portrayed. Is missing, on the other hand, his facet as literary creator? which the director goes tiptoe-not in vain the work of Santa Teresa is considered Summit within the lyric of the Siglo de Oro Spanish.The pistol from my brother had been so far the only foray into the world of cinema by the author Ray Loriga as director. As the other (as writer), however, has written the screenplays for the seventh day (Carlos Saura) and absent (Daniel Calparsoro), and participated in meat Trémula (Pedro Almodóvar). In this production of Vicente Gómez also exercises the functions of writer: written by himself, he takes you to the screen. Note, however, that transfer of the text to the image the masterful help of cinematographer José Luis Alcaine, as well as the art of costume designer Eiko Ishioka, winner of an Oscar for Dracula, and support in the music of Ángel Illarramendi. Perhaps all these elements that get that this film will not be in mediocre, but not raised, only for this reason, in the category of "a good movie". As photography is concerned, the indiscriminate succession of pictorial compositions of pre-Raphaelite Court can lead to boredom to the Viewer. Abusive succession of pictures, adequate to see in an art gallery, not so much perhaps in a cinema.Paz Vega as Santa Teresa is contained. The role requires. But he notices. We are witnessing a contained interpretation Yes, forcibly contained. The guess little comfortable in the skin of the Mystic. The rest of actors complete the cast of the movie, master most. Side more or less usual our film as Álvaro de Luna, José Luís Gómez or Manuel Morón. They note that they have craft and art. The part of secondary female get worse stop: Geraldine Chaplin and Leonor Watling, each making Geraldine Chaplin and Leonor Watling, respectively.As a CODA, not I refuse to mention two sentences in the film refer to the own Santa Teresa: "Endemoniada not, but all engolfada of God", said by herself, and "is ascent of prayer", commented by the always magisterial Eusebio Poncela (what a shame that her role is so short).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2244

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Me siento rejuvenecer

muchocine

Masterpiece of comedy and inspection, a gem of a film. His extravagance, its absurd logic and its high sense of dialogs remain in the memory of the movie buff.

Howard Hawks said that the real drama is terribly near a comedy which has usually been one genre minor in the history of cinema and even literature. The payroll of filmmakers who have dedicated their talents to the "screwball comedy" going own hawks to Lubitsch, passing by Leo McCarey, Gregory LaCava, Billy Wilder, Frank Capra, George Cukor and Preston Sturges and actors that have immortalized this crazy film, powerful visual gags and dizzying parliaments were Jack Lemmon, Cary Grant, Katherine Hepburn, Walter Matthau, Charles CoburnMarilyn Monroe or Gary Cooper. I am rejuvenate is a masterpiece of comedy and inspection, a gem of a film. His extravagance, its absurd logic and its high sense of dialogs remain in the memory of the movie buff. This light operetta of monkeys running acetate half and alchemists of eternal youth is the quintessence of the genre along with the bringing up baby, also of Hawks and with similar cast. In a Cary Grant is an introverted University professor who lives to rebuild a dinosaur skeleton and raise money for the Museum which governs. In I feel rejuvenate, Grant is a removed and chief scientist who creates to have found the formula for eternal youth, although reality confesses that he has been Rodolfo, the monkey of the Indies, primate impersonator, to activity with test tubes and flasks, giving with the Holy Grail of eternal life. Hecht, Lederer and Diamond, which would then be narrative escort by Billy Wilder in his best works, produced a fabulous script that would have been delighted to Darwin and, under rope, showing with irony, the future of science and the inevitable interference in the business world to take advantage of their progress and make cash at their expense. The title in English (Monkey Business, business of monkeys) introduces openly the parade guignolesco, bufo and sexy of the plot. A prudish Marilyn Monroe, sandwiched in a narrow skirt until coronary stranglehold leaves that her tits, pointing to infinity with those times fasteners, so open and pujados, steal you (plane to plane) any interest in what he says. Then there is the scene in which plant his leg against the timorous Bernaby Fulton teacher that he appreciated the quality of the socks that he himself has invented. "Miss Laurel I was teaching their acetates", Lisp Grant before that the BREW manufactured by the chimpanzee makes rejuvenate, get to ride in a convertible Monroe or skate as a child. These age regressions lead to all actors displayed their most circus records. Up the own Charles Coburn, impeccable, always goose when Ginger Rogers, become girl - I add that never ceased to be it - gets a fish below the belt. Crazy Rhythm, the continuous zarandeo of implausible situations, but here logics become engine of fast-paced action, which does not let you breathe. In these times, in the film made now that it touched us to enjoy, there are some Hawks?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3568

Andrés Pons

Baxter

muchocine

Baxter sees the world as it is cruel and inhumane, behaving in the same way.

Anyone think that this is the film seen on several occasions with dog, either family film "LASSIE, partners and Hounds" or terror as CUJO, ROTWEILLER".Nothing to do because here the shots go by completely opposite destinations in a fable that humanizes the dog protagonist becoming one human being again.We are seeing from the drama, comedy or classical cinema of horror to animal emotions transmitted from smiles to tears through hatred.Because BAXTER sees the world as it is cruel and inhumane, behaving in the same form. Each family bring new emotions, feeling us witnesses every word thanks to a script with iron fist, a masterpiece of a hardness that shocked, that you catch in this spiral of characters to the limit, with a bottom that you stuck hopeless forever.Inexplicably director end lost by not returning to work.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2943

El mágico

El ultimátum de Bourne

muchocine

Classical action of our times, excellently filmed by Paul Greengrass film. Pure entertainment.

This is undoubtedly the consecrating role of Matt Damon. Beyond that has been rewarded with his friend Ben Affleck for his writing in "Good Will Hunting" with an Oscar, Damon is not a writer of weight in the industry. If it is, without a doubt a versatile actor whose talent lies in the ability to adapt to the skin of any subject you can imagine (and I am not exaggerating at all), it is flexible, dominates your body and its mark is of total commitment with each interpretation. He has done many supported by favorable impact at the box office works, ("The talented Mr Ripley", "Syriana", "The Departed", and recently "The good shepard"), but however the massive global comes with this, his saga. The story already know, is Jason Bourne who returns to action when two journalists investigating the missing CIA Treadstone section are removed under mysterious circumstances in an attempt to erase the last pieces of the puzzle of its past. We know those who follow the story, which Bourne shows the dark side of American security agencies and ruthless in its role to defend what they believe are legitimate interests of his fellow citizens. The victim has been (or not, will have to see the end to find out!) of a nefarious agenda of brainwashing that transformed it into a killing machine. Now, when the services they learn the news of its existence appears in "The Guardian" (famous English tabloid that specializes in research notes), will begin to pursue, control, monitor, and eventually eliminate anyone to contact Bourne, to neutralize any political implication of the Treadstone program (which made of Jason, who Jason is, a perfect spy)given that it is not what is said to be "politically correct" (!). Damon is Bourne, from head to toe. Feel and breathe like him, transmits the bewilderment and the strength of its presence even during the time it is silent meditating (that is worth seeing). This ex-spy without past will try by all means accessing information that different connections bring him to discover who is and how he came to be who is now. On this trip, the fight against the bad guys will be fierce and ingenious every moment of the way. "Appear several familiar faces of the second part (well the ensemble of the roles of Joan Allen and the enigmatic Julia Stiles, who make an exact contribution to the plot), and as always, there will be persecutions incredible, both on foot and vehicle, shots, explosions, murders, etc.""Bourne: the ultimatum" is a classical action film of our time, excellently filmed by Paul Greengrass (who also made the previous), well-known director among us also by the very good "United 93". This filmmaker you passionate about the almost permanent use of a nervous and intense camera to make us feel at the epicenter of the action. Greengrass he cares that its viewers are part of the visual deployment and integrates them through cut, multiple levels and outlets on movement that add tension to the general frame of the plot. Does not reach the superlatives levels of "Live free or die hard - 4.0" (perhaps a little less deployment, perhaps.), but is there. It is a magnificent proposal for pure entertainment, with the only caveat that much of what appears in this third part, has already appeared, as well as his characters evoke much history, with which should have already seen the previous thus enjoying more. You must not miss it at this point in the year, they must not be more than four films of this genre that reached the rating of outstanding on our blog. Do tell: what time are you going to go today? You do not have to miss it!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3262

Kiko de España

Stardust

muchocine

The best movie of magical adventures I've seen in my life. Not hate me for such an assertion, but Stardust seems almost perfect and a wise choice for a first date bar movie. Endearing.

I do not like the Princess Bride, Willow, Legend, Conan, Conan Returns (kidding), Hook, dark glass, inside the labyrinth or the anillera trilogy I swallowed in film because she had to see it.Let's say I have a problem with the swords and the magical worlds. Let's say that they touch me the eggs almost as much as the movies of time with the wonderful exception of Marie Antoinette. Let's say that now pass by your head a host of insults towards myself and especially my ability to analyze a movie as Stardust.No is so hard: Stardust feel me great.I enjoyed as a child in the pass in Sitges this tale full of bad English host and more balanced than any of the films that I quote above and Pirates of the Caribbean (which I've only seen the first chapter, forgive me Ironcita) Stardust is the total, resounding, definitive, confirmation of Matthew Vaughn, who had already left in Layer Cake enough samples of criterion as to trust in this adaptation of a Gaiman little serious, which is the to my I like.Bruges, brothers who do not hesitate to kill between them for a Kingdom, Knights, star shaped girl with fake British accent and above all, humour in abundance during cent thirty minutes.But there will be controversy. There will be who argumentará De Niro is a caricature of himself and that only try to imitate another recent film pirata-payaso.Believe me, De Niro passes better gatewayed at its last, let me tell eleven latest movies playing captain Shakespeare, a rude piratón with a secret Charlie Cox convinces me (and how!) as Tristan, the prologue with the guardian of the wall (and its evolution) is hilarious and nothing, I repeat, nothing, makes screeching perfectly oiled from a grandiose epic that hinge, as almost all the large offending movies (see Grindhouse) of recent years, fails at the box office in a precipitous manner in favour of "pure cinema" titles such as wild pigs or hour Tip 3. I shit in the mother that gave birth.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3193

Ana Belén Pacheco

Ho Voglia Di Te

muchocine

It renounced the spirit of the Step of the first film to close a story that promised to be interesting and more mature than its predecessor, which achieved with a certain dignity until you reach the last quarter of an hour of footage.

They say that second parts were never good. Be a continuation does not have to necessarily mean that it is bad, but in this case is to implement less. Ho Voglia Di Te takes place a couple of years after the events narrated in Tre Metri Sopra Il Cielo when Step returns from United States and is reunited with his friends, enemies, and ghosts of the past by those who fled the country. It also has as origin the Maccio literary writing while in this case is more evil than an asset. He soon meets a mysterious girl that starts a relationship while he tries to fix his life putting your goals in order, found a job and starts an adult life that has been postponed for years. The misfortune of Ho Voglia Di Te is undoubtedly its forced, forced and abrupt more complacent than satisfactory outcome. He renounced the spirit of the Step of the first film and fits in an aburguesada fairly mediocre solution to close a story that promised to be interesting and more mature than its predecessor and which get some dignity until you reach the last quarter of an hour of footage with this "taken from the manga twist" that could have been saved with a.With the new director disappears the voiceover of the radio replacing with a perfect soundtrack with the names of the Italian song today and also resigns to the crazed of motorbike racing to put in place proper camera and levels little risky. Indeed if something peca is little ambitious already that with his characters players that had already captivated to the public could have put more meat in the grill. DATA on the película:fecha of Italy premiere: 9 March 2007No has been dubbed into Spanish or released in our country.It is the continuation of Tre Metri Sopra Il Cielo

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3719

José A. Peig

Soy leyenda

muchocine

Anyway, after scares and intelligent management of suspense we find the greater simplicity in a regrettable final concentration of clichés to all levels of narration. This is certainly to fall back and not be able to lift ever, hear.

And back again with the zombie theme. The first deliberate waste of Robert Rodriguez, then "invasion" (we have not yet seen but we have been told that it is very bad), and could then fun with plagiarism of realistic terror in REC, and now this religious dyes scheme set in an apocalyptic context. And is that nothing there is worse for a film that be just that: a scheme. It will Smith embodies a scientist obsessed with his desire to be the Savior of civilization. The portrait of his solitude among the remains of a decrepit New York becomes claim to delve into topics as the involution to barbarism and our sacred vulnerability before the death of God in a world of assassins, although its resources stagnate in a schematic expression of such solitude (depth of field in flat long that isolate the central character)(, more the sensationalism of the sound tricks). It is also true that the Mise en scène, aided by a cloudy picture and in accordance with the psychological state of the protagonist, gets at times capturing the attention of the Viewer to create a stifling atmosphere.It was difficult that a film with a very brilliant realization could decline as it does from the second segment, concluding the most predictable way. The portrait of loneliness becomes a messianic moral conclusion that we have seen many times in much more suggestive that this stories. Digitisation of humans and infected animals is a mistake, because computer graphics drowns the human dimension of the same, more resembling a herd of creatures of the underworld that humans stripped of his soul and destined to the abyss of madness (that was the best material to talk about isolation to two bands and the context appropriate for its marked link to science fiction).Anyway, after scares and intelligent management of suspense we find the greater simplicity in a regrettable final concentration of clichés to all levels of narration. This is certainly to fall back and not be able to lift ever, hear.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3141

Ana Belén Pacheco

Resident Evil Extincion

muchocine

Resident Evil does not convince. It is more of the same or even worse. Try to twist to surprise even Viewer accustomed to more elaborate spins and a little less hackneyed scripts.

Alice is now a kind of genetic experiment as his peculiar blood can serve to the Umbrella Corporation to include the T virus when it has already infected half a world. While Jesiqkyytacyyti City survivors flee to Alaska is the only corner without infecting the not dead they will attack your caravan as well as the interests of Umbrella. I took the first separate as innocent entertainment. The second began to tire me but is with the third installment when I I planto.Resident Evil does not convince. It is more of the same or even worse. Try to twist to surprise even Viewer accustomed to more elaborate spins and a little less hackneyed scripts. Its main virtue is that at least misleading not because that essentially gives what is supposed to be that it should be: a lot of surrealist fights hand-to-hand. Disappointing is the new Umbrella monstrosity both computer graphics and charisma. Next to Milla Jovovich (so haughty and little actress as always) are two heavyweights best-known for his television roles for his unfortunate performances on the big screen: Oded Fehr (Sleeper Cell or the Mummy) and Ali Larter (Heroes or Final destination) between all of them trying to navigate this tape that is doomed to collapse.This Film directed by Russell Mulcahy (producer of the three installments), and produced by Paul Anderson (director of laprimera and screenwriter of all deliveries). With this background we could not expect major changes in content and approach.It seems that this installment is based on one of the most popular games in the series "Code Veronica" that takes place in the desert and where infected crows appear for the first time but the originality for me end there. In any case we should expect to see that they think fans of video games that are you been attending rooms comes to a third party and that it has been confirmed that there will be a fourth.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/271

Tito Chinchan

Asterix y los vikingos

muchocine

Too focused on the smaller, lacks the acid humor of Asterix. Older possibly is bored a lot.

I dislike the gratuitous violence, and much less in movies that are supposed to be for children. While watching the film comics remembered mentally and if it is true, they are violent, but it is a very innocent violence which rather hints. But when passed the comics to film things change quite. Already happened with Mortadelo y Filemón and it has happened with this. To give an example, the scene in which raining down teeth of Roman Legionary is not something you want that you store in the retina of my toddler.The film is a new visitor arrives to the better-known village of indomitable Gauls. This is the son of a great warrior, so his father entrusts to the villagers, and especially to Asterix and Obelix, make him a man. But the kid is not be what is considered a brave man. WIMP and WIMP will have to pass an ordeal to become a true Gallic Warrior. On the other hand, a tribe of Vikings come to Gaul seeking the secret of flight, who believe to be in fear.The truth is that the film, in the eyes of a somewhat infantiloide adult, is a little roll. The script already know the comics, although they have added you characters and have been mixed concepts of other stories. The plot is easy to follow, clearly delimiting the good and the bad. The drawings are correct and quite passable animation. But I finished not like, given that it is very lacking in the acid humor of Asterix. I personally think that it is too focused on children. But for these, better get the old tapes of Miyazaki, free from violence and evil.In short, to spend an hour with children in the film. Although older possibly is bored a lot.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/709

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Infiltrados

muchocine

Shines for his handling of the time: the boot platonically with Gimme Shelter, the Rolling Stones principia already where you going to go the abundant shots, brioso movies, movies with text, hypnotic film.

More than a film, is a return, a refund of the retirement trust. Gangs of New York was a spectacle as bombastic as ersatz on the beginnings of a city and the birth of their clans. The Aviator was a tour de force of dramatic, a biopic, skimmed hagiography of the glamour of an era and a character. Infiltrators is a tape sewn with the remnants of all the previous films of the Italian-American master, but the remnants are yours and this time he has made exquisite wastebasket with delivery, with very high flights and the result is amazing.Are not dealing with the masterpiece that was one of our own, which talked about the same thing, but it is the best tape, to my mind, this boring and weakling film year. Shines for his handling of the time: the boot platonically with Gimme Shelter, the Rolling Stones principia already where you going to go the abundant shots, brioso movies, movies with text, hypnotic film. Also shines because Scorsese is a fabulous stories counter: it has always been. What matters is that the events that make up the literary text are explained more clearly to the viewer and it is not thrown to a roller coaster of side stories who bring nothing to the story itself, a trilogy hongkonesa on gangs swept Asia.Para this shine, Scorsese not abused the soundtrack: confined to go dropping songs while they are subordinate in excess images as it had in Casino or the already mentioned one of our or as masterfully does Tarantino. Attention powerfully an Irish theme attacked by a band of hardcore metal that sounds like two or three times in the central part of the film. The primary attention of the director is starting from a ground zero of the feelings, thus referred you in press conferences that we saw on television. That ground zero emotion allows an epic metaphysics, a bewildering exercise of absolute resignation to any religious reference. God does not exist. It is not. Left at all and now look them from above, extremely attentive to the disagreements of all these types his whimsical hand threw them into the world.Scorsese is obsessed by violence in the human condition. Physical violence and also the most complex level of semantic violence. All of his films (this one in a very high level) are configured as vehicles for research of that obsession. The end (which not is here revealed) makes everything in place and takes the phrase with which opens this fantastic guignol of truth and the deception. "Before", it has a voiceover at the beginning of the film, "had the Church, which was a way for us to us". And now only campa rampant at the Mafia with their household God, with its tiny demiurge, who is a Jack Nicholson made a cabronazo perfect, histrionic, supercharged ego, hyperbolic, but compelling and daunting. The perfect father.Do not close this opinion without mentioning Leonardo di Caprio, a great actor that has been already recognized by directors such as Spielberg and Scorsese, that require constantly. You ache to see onwards these folders glued to the chest of the adolescents of Institute exhibited, flirty and Ladino, the face of Leonardo when he was the King of the world. Now have to Orlando Bloom.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/546

Plissken

Sheitan

muchocine

Enjoyable if you not compare it with recent summits of the genus

Sheitan is the Persian name for Satán. And it is also the name of the hip hop group punkorro listen to the protagonists in the movie called. 'Sheitan' (2006), first foray into length short French film maker Kim Chapiron which has counted with some godfathers of exception: Vincent Cassel (Executive producer and star of the show) and Monica Bellucci, nothing less.The film focuses on recent clichés fantasy film, and especially of the francophone. A group of young men lost in the French countryside (on Christmas Eve, once again) are witnesses of bizarre acts perpetrated by the no less bizarre inhabitants of the lost village.The argument should leave it there, although those who have already enjoyed more than recommended 'Calvaire' of the Belgian Fabrice Du Welz, 'The House of 1,000 corpses', playful directorial debut of Rob Zombie, or any of the films of the current 'number one' of the genre, Alexandre AJA, know by where they are going to go the shots. Too, perhaps.The hipervitaminado rhythm of 'Sheitan' works until the feeling of "déjà vu" prevent surprise with the history, unless the song moments walking towards the umpteenth re-release of 'Texas Chainsaw Massacre'. The function is only animated by the presence of the winding and completely hypnotic Roxane Mesquida, my particular discovery throughout the film, and above all by a guiñolesco and pasadísimo of laps Vincent Cassel. Otherwise, simply correct young "malotes" endangered, and sufficiently disturbing the "rednecks" French as to give bad roll. In terms of art and photography, new shows French of what you can do with four hard and visual talent, the style of the appointed AJA and Du Welz, although he is sometimes guilty of "astonishing".Sin_embargo, when the film navigates towards the more routine routine, that ubiquitous third act of "correcalles" of the American teenage slashers, Chapiron holds for us horny last six minutes that work almost alone, which makes you think that) the seventy initial minutes were filling; (and B) well look, it wasn't so bad, and addition is small, and in addition I have fun.By the way, like 'Calvaire', 'Sheitan' also comes loaded with religious, but less subtle symbolism. And could even be a theological re-reading the always clear. That step face Monsieur Chapiron if, I. Enjoyable if you not compare it with recent summits of the genre. A 6.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3899

Ivan Villamel

Sympathy for lady vengeance

muchocine

Building exceptional, once again, its director shows up to point a great creator can innovate through the start-up scene and storytelling, a major filmmaker

On a few occasions you will see a server surrender unconditionally to the qualities as filmmaker of any director in the times, thing very difficult given the difficulties that are usually find all of them when it comes to shooting on creative freedom, be slaves of fashion or the tastes of the public to reach a particular strip of spectators. But there is still film-makers which, for one reason or another, in this case a privileged position within an emerging cinematography as the Korean, they can express themselves freely. Park Chan Wook has always been my devotion santo, inevitably, film after film has marked me and made me hope about the future of cinema, at the risk of seems too risky. It could not be less in the conclusion of his particular trilogy on vengeance, a new sample of the film of Mr Chan wisdom Wook.En this time history takes us to a Korean prison, in which serving Lee Geum-Ja for thirteen years, due to the death of a child which the own Lee Geum had kidnapped. Once out of jail, we follow their first steps in freedom, as he gets a job at a bakery and plans revenge on the man responsible for his imprisonment, which is none other than Choi Min-Sik ("Oldboy") playing the Sr.Baek, a teacher of primary school, with dark secrets about several missing children, and even the daughter had Lee Geum, and was forced to divest it because of him.Park Chan-Wook takes us back to land frequented earlier in his sublime work, those in which the redemption, revenge, and the poetic justice give hand to form again, an explosive cocktail in its final result. This narrated with a dramatic progression commendable, only slow by these flashbacks they remember Lee Geum in jail of women, which, incidentally, has a theatrical tone that I do not know if it is adjusted to the reality of the Korean women's prisons, but resulting from oppression that exudes the screen and supported in the angled framing of its directorIt transmits the feeling in an impeccable way. This dramatic progression reaches its climax in the final part of the story, in which the moral ambiguity seizes the film to reach one of the most poetic end of all his work, and reminiscent, greatly to the end of Oldboy in its visual elements, especially the purity of her snows, in contrast with the long and tortuous road to redemption by our heroine (do?), as a final release.In the technical section, it must be said, that as usual, the brilliance and formal staging of this genius of the image which is Park Chan Wook, seizes each and every one of the scenes. These extraordinary close-ups that give intensity to the story, without resulting to nothing forced or free of charge, or the aforementioned frames angled of constant oppression, full of edges, as the emotions of the characters in his films, becomes, once again in his film, an element as important or more than own narration, advancing in the story precisely from this perfection. All together of course, with his particular sense of humor, always as black and Chan-Wook always know to exploit as well. Sequences as the of the execution final, that is a negrísima sunset the day of any kind of vengeful film, always from this so reburying humorous and ironic distancing, or the dream of the execution of a Baek dog-shaped (actually significant), they give us an idea for where is heading the film towards a magical realism mixed with a sense of very black humorreaching sometimes the discomfort sought by its director to cover everything with a series of religious elements as the purity of the soul, the destination or the redemption. Even allows the luxury of resorting to certain visual resources of great originality and why not leaving to be ironic, cited as an example the scene of sex on the table, and as with own sway of bodies emerges from beneath the table written banner to display on screen time of condemnation of the girl that carries such activitybright once again.Many scenes remain in the retina of the spectator over the footage, including that bright scene of the attack in the alley, with some echoes to the scene of the massive fight between Oldboy, resulting in this most violent time if it is to be dry and direct, unceremoniously, by way of operatic Greek tragedy. It is just one example of the amount of details and nuances that arise from the work of this great creator, resorting once again to the intensity of the colors as visual track of the lively or vital State of the characters, with vague images that are not in vain in the history.If to all this we add an excellent acting job, even for the most minor characters (perfect group of parents in the final scene), we will find ourselves with a film that closes brilliantly the particular and revealing trilogy of vengeance initiated by Park Chan Wook with "Sympathy for MR.""Vengeance" (containing one of final curricula more cruelly emotional that a server recalls, stirring me stomach caused concern), a somewhat lower this work "Sympathy for Lady Vengeance" because it contained half an hour in its somewhat confusing history knot, but that on the contrary, was even more painfully dramatic which is before us today. Above both lies which precisely in the Middle chronologically, is the masterpiece of Korean cinema (and world probably) "Oldboy", for which this subscribes, the best film of the last ten years.The only but will find fans unaccustomed to this type of Korean cinema, is precisely the fact that the narrative occasionally is heading towards a film elipsis that makes certain scenes to jump from one to others without going to a conventional narrative, something that in my opinion, does no more than enrich the narration, by very contradictory as it may seem. Despite this can be a small burden for certain type of public not accustomed to this common resource in the Asian cinema.Ultimately, building exceptional, once again, its director shows up to point a great creator can innovate through the start-up scene and storytelling, a major filmmaker, at the expense of repeating myself, but that has already proven his career (go no further recent and commented here "I m a Cyborg, but that's Ok") which is a privileged director and a breath of fresh air on the world scene.Absolutely essential.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2783

Kiko de España

Crash

muchocine

So cool isn't. Haggis wheel well (she is 50 years old and works with Eastwood), but is not any genius: is the creator of the series "Walker Texas Ranger".

For a time this part come producing in Hollywood stories that seem to want to laugh of people. Robert Altman directed 1993 "Vidas cruzadas" (Short cuts) and the choral film fever began to invade us.The Altman film lasted three horazas as the putative daughter which came six years after the hand of Paul Thomas Anderson, "Magnolia". They were two great films. In 2003, Alejandro González Iñárritu conned us them all with "21 grams", a kind of "hagoloquequieroconmipelo" film version."I personally believe that"21 grams"is made with descartes of" loves dogs ", seems a bad sequel, those that do not know well if they are second parts, remakes, autohomenajes or who is I.""21 grams" was the plot of a movie of desktop, and script editing was horrible and the picture came to load. The hate you almost as much as "Strange coincidences" movie of last year which offended me but that very much.On this occasion, Paul Haggis, writer of "Million Dollar Baby", he debuted with grace at first, before time to stumble and fall in a succession of clichés that comes to despair at the end.The plot involves a series of characters (a couple of cops, a locksmith and his daughter, a family of Apus, a marriage rico da equal, because everyone has a thousand and one moves later or sooner face each other) in the now routine movie in media res.I am getting sick that the choral tapes have to have an accident as a link (Iñárritu takes 2 of 2 and I think that the new is also on there.) and having to endure stupid situations (that the Bullock on the stair slip) to stay afloat of difficult to give during resolution premises.It has interesting moments, such as boot, with a flat interesting sequence, and the criminal act of the couple of buddy renegríos. What happens is that it is anticlimática and does not surprise you at any time. Not never know what happens to many characters and the "21 grams" rubs ridicule in extreme situations (is really so difficult not to ridicule the supposed death that chains all?.)Not thrilled, and worst of all is that at the end, when you bromeas with the "ahorá fall frogs in the sky" it is about to pass. Finally, say that not so cool is. Haggis wheel well (she is 50 years old and works with Eastwood), but is not any genius: is the creator of the series "Walker Texas Ranger".And it ends with a theme of Stereophonics that paste not or glue.Best regards.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1564

Jesus Lens

La vida de los otros

muchocine

When finished the projection of?The life of others?, in a movie theater filled with unusually for a German film, became one of those special and unique silences which predict a 30metre standing ovation.

When he had completed the screening of "The lives of others", in an unusually full cinema for a German film, became one of those special and unique silences which predict a 30metre ovation, in which all had participated willingly and relax. someone that would break the fire have there been.Said it Sacai, nothing more appear uncredited: "is one of those movies that you just want to applaud". Effectively. "The huge and long peliculón Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck (Flo onwards) not only happens in a whisper but that you indeed, reconciles with the good things of life.""The lives of others" is an immersive, Lung free, in the reality of a Germany of the East very close in time. When we hear talk of films about the cold war, Checkpoint Charlie and the iron curtain, we are accustomed to being in ByN, that tell exciting stories of spies, harassment and non-stop action. But the reality of the Socialist Germany in the nearby 1980s presents as much less glamorous and more menacing and gloomy in the film of Flo.Una Word, a concept plan about all the protagonists: blacklist. We are between the intellectual forefront of German Theatre modernity. And arise the suspicions. Is it possible that Georg Dreyman, one of the great cultural icons of German socialism is so good, so pure and so loyal to the regime as it appears? The mediocre, to Ascend, use a very effective technique: sow doubts and spreading shit on all those around him, in a way that the foul layer of fog that contribute to to its around can disguise their own inability and its odor. And that is what makes one of the capitostes of the Stasi, the dreaded secret police German: put under surveillance to Dreyman. Let's see what happens.And so, the relationship between the security guard, Captain Gerd Wiesler, an official expert; and the guarded and his girlfriend, a famous actress, begins to be more contradictory. And changing. And ambivalent. And again contradictory. And fascinating. And beautiful. And tragic. And many other things and feelings generated by the viewing of a fantastic and hypnotic film that speaks to us of a past time, but who is there to the other side of the remains of a wall. And in the minds of many, many people.Indeed, the film of Flo has much to do with that other, equally fascinating film by Francis Ford Coppola: "The conversation". Both are formally austere, but a draught and a transcendence that show the film without being boring, can be much more than a hobby or an entertainment for kids. A fascinating film thesis, which suggest can be done without plúmbeos speeches. Without launch viscera against the Viewer, you can get this not blinking for two hours and a half. Without free pyrotechnics you can get shock of neurons in a few spectators who, when offered quality film products, respond and come to see them. Come from where you come.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3263

Jack Torrance

Hatchet

muchocine

It is sad that in only the two and a half minutes of the false "Thanksgiving" trailer for Eli Roth has more sarcasm, affection and knowledge of the Slasher that throughout the film by Adam Green.

Considered by many specialist sites such as one of the films to take into account in this 2007, the independent Hatchet has been released in the United States in small distribution circuits. An exhibition limited for a film of relative under budget, which has sold very well as a tribute to the Slashers of the eighties, with the series Friday the 13th as a standard. Hatchet tries to impersonate a return to forms and spirit of tapes as the killer of Rosemary, burning, or The Prom Night, but any connoisseur of the subgenre quickly realizes that there is no link with them except the stubbornness of their creators for attempting to present your product in this way.A tribute with irony and true love to the genus seek, first, a stylistic approach appropriate, using their lack of budget as an element in their favor. It is sad that in only the two and a half minutes of the false "Thanksgiving" trailer for Eli Roth has more sarcasm, affection and knowledge of the Slasher that throughout the film by Adam Green. Hatchet is raised as a psycho-splatter the old-fashioned, but their characters, situations, script or formal aspect seem taken from any film created for the American video market. There is no spark in potentially funny situations and those who have (very) occasionally, are repeated until exhaustion. Once seen the grace, film stops working and they start endless tedious situations. In a film of this kind, deliberately bad?, various incompetences in exchange for a bit of fun world can forgive. What happens is that when a 80 minute film should expect 50 so that something begins to happen, it fails something important.There is no character development, any especially funny situation. anything. When it comes to the time of the appearance of Victor Crowley, supernatural killer function, one is too boring as that it cares to see to be deformed destroying the odious characters of forms more wild than one can imagine. But even al gore is well shot. The effects are very good, old-style, but shooting them is flat, without passion and so amateur as the rest of the film. In conclusion. Hatchet is a tedious journey of 80 minutes shot without style or profession. For more irritation, short its end abruptly, in a feint to try to leave the Viewer without knowing which will happen. Get only the sensation of thymus reaches dangerous levels. Very laudable in its attempt to parody films bloody and bad, taking the path of irony and pitorreo, but when you do not offer a product that will improve in any aspect to the movies that you want to emulate, it is better to stay at home.Of course, not rely on the many and effusive criticism that will receive pages websites, Blogs and other specialized media.Hatchet is not the Slither of films of serial killers, not even this at the height of the worst sequels in the series of the Hockey mask. Well was maybe yes of the Octava.¿o the ninth?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1938

Oscar Cantero

Retrato de una obsesión

muchocine

Once again mixes facts with fiction, running the risk of confusing the one with little knowledge of the events of what is true and what not.

Portrait of an obsession is a tribute to the famous American photographer Diane Arbus, in this dangerous and ambiguous genre that combines in a manner somewhat reckless historical facts contrasted with fantasies of a screenplay.In particular, it tells the eventful and controversial love story of a reporter's family wealthy with a satrap and anarchic arrogant neighbor who introduces in the lower depths and leads her to hobnob with all kinds of asocial and marginalized individuals. Nicole Kidman is an actress with a significant amount of records, what makes it feel comfortable in this type of roles, while Robert Downey Jr. shines with their own light on this occasion, giving good sample that recently takes good the time spent outside of jail or the courts. One of the great Remora which may have this film is the intention of the Distributor to try to present it as a pure thriller, drawing on tricks like change the poster or give it a Spanish name has no similarity with their original, Fur. On the technical side, the film is quite correct, with an appropriate use of the close-ups and silences. In any case, portrait of an obsession at times, slashing vulgarity in his argument, and lacks the thrust, the efugios and the absorption capacity of the viewer that should have to be considered a good movie. Anyway, the worth of the protagonist Duo may be sufficient reason for deciding to dedicate a little more than two hours covering their footage.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1310

Verolindapechocha

Banderas de nuestros padres

muchocine

I do not think that it is the best of any of the two, but it is a good film, especially if you're a fan of the war genre and you like e.g. La Delgada red line.

Flags of Our Fathers (2006) translated in Peru as the conquest of the Honor and Spain, more literally, as the flags of our fathers is the first part of an interesting proposal of director Clint Eastwood to tell the story of the battle of Iwo Jima (vital in World War II) from two points of view: the United States, which corresponds to this film and the Japanesethat befits the film letters from Iwo Jima.Miren the image of the poster. How many times have seen this image? I guess that many, then EE.UU. It is full of monuments that represent. I think that this photo of a group of soldiers working together to put the flag on a hill just take on Iwo Jima, is as famous as the first man on the Moon by placing the American flag. And both pictures have been accused of being mere mounts to the collective control and increasing the patriotic feeling. And it is that the images are so powerful.Flags of Our Fathers tells the story about is image and its protagonists through the voice of one of his sons, the son of the soldier nurse, John "doc" Bradley, played by Ryan Phillipe (crimes of the mind).Without like me nothing the war genre, I think that is a very good film, with characters well built and powerful and violent images, that show us as war has more victims than those who die in it.The film is based on the bestseller of James Bradley and Ron Powers that when Clint Eastwood read wanted turned into film. However, the rights had already been acquired by Steven Spielberg. After a while Eastwood and Spielberg crossed in a 2004 Oscar afterparty and Spielberg agreed to shoot the film as a producer if Eastwood was Director. And when Eastwood proposed filming the Japanese version of the matter also agreed. Good things can happen when two great together.I do not think that it is the best of any of the two, but it is a good film, especially if you're a fan of the war genre and you like e.g. La Delgada red line. For my part, I think that I will not see the counterpart, letters from Iwo Jima.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3682

Oscar Martínez

El Orfanato

muchocine

A good film despite its many references, but neither much less is the wonder that have tried to sell us with its promotional bombardment.

Produced by Guillermo del Toro, the path traveled so far by the orphanage before even of the approval of the public has been truly spectacular. First of all, the film, directed by a novel director as Juan Antonio Bayona and starring Belén Rueda in the title role, accompanied by Fernando Cayo, Géraldine Chaplin, Roger Prince and Mabel Rivera was chosen to inaugurate the present edition of the Sitges Festival, and makes only a few days, named official candidate to the Oscar on behalf of our country.The orphanage tells the story of Laura, a woman who returns with his family to the orphanage in which grew from girl with the intention of opening a residence for disabled children. The new environment arouses the imagination of his son, which begins to be carried away by increasingly intense fantasy games. They are concerned to Laura over its increasingly, to the point where comes to think that there is something in the House is threatening his family. She comes up with something extraordinary and, despite the fact that she is a woman with very clear principles, his universe falters questioning everything in what believed. do both trumpeting deserves the orphanage? The truth is that not.The film, despite having a beautiful Bill, offers absolutely nothing we have not seen since a thousand times, extolling a plot with echoes to movies like Poltergeist, the island of the dead or even, why not, White noise, an aesthetic hitchcockiana and locations on the line of films as The haunting. But, undoubtedly, if there is a film whose comparison is odious with the directorial debut of Juan Antonio Bayona, that is each other. And it is that the orphanage cannot fail to remind us in many ways to the genius of Alejandro Amenábar, because bebe avidly it both aesthetic and arguably.Odious comparisons aside, one must recognize certain merits of the orphanage.As I said, the film has a beautiful Bill, even though it lacks the drama that many had promised and that, supposedly, made it into something more than a simple supernatural horror film. On the other hand, Belén Rueda performed a remarkable performance, eirigiéndose as soul of the film, largely because the rest of interpretations do not cease to be almost anecdotal, as Géraldine Chaplin, who must appear at least in ten minutes of footage in a sequence, joking aside, it appears to be taken from fourth Milenio.Aunque, for a server, the biggest problem of the orphanage is its lack of personality, and is that the movie has been done in a way so academic, as Orthodox, that anyone could have signed the title, especially the own Guillermo del Toro. In addition, add the film of Juan Antonio Bayona fails to create at any time real moments of tension, except in specific occasions thanks to certain usual but always efectistas turns and, as usual with this kind of films, with twenty minutes of footage one already can guess how to finish the story.Finally, a recommended film, but that does not provide anything new.I am a 6'5 sopbre 10.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/423

Kiko de España

Los calientabanquillos

muchocine

This barrabasada is intended to be, and I think that a (deserved) tribute succeeds, to the real freak.

Napoleón dynamite, Gigolo and Finch join together to play baseball against children aged twelve. With that argument, most scholars won't see this movie or on television a morning drinking beer with nothing to do, but see you where, I I I passed big. Dennis Dugan, director of the Happy Gilmore enorrme and other Sandlerianos vehicles (Adam Sandler, refers, that it produces here), as well as the misunderstood and hilarious Evil Woman (three idiots and a witch.) Her I bought on dvd. (I'm a freak?) He gives his personal touch. (that does it.) (Beyond the Farrelly) this barrabasada is intended to be, and I think that a (deserved) tribute succeeds, to the real freak.I laughed my seeing how the great John Lovitz (still I am laughing at his ANTHOLOGICAL Hitlerian gag of rats to the race) gives life to a billionaire with too much free time. I really liked. Not everything will be qualité. I give you a 7.PD: Nick Swardson, multifóbico brother of the character of David Spade, a discovery. We'll see soon accompanying Chief Ferrell in Blades of Glory.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1237

Yojimbo

Firewall

muchocine

Firewall is not the last film by Richard Loncraine, but the last adventure of Harrison Ford.

Firewall is not the last film by Richard Loncraine, but the last adventure of Harrison Ford. And it is what sells. And what if he sells. Someone like Ford has guaranteed a minimum of public who want to see him in full form and doing what they know to do to perfection: interpret.In this case it is a computer expert responsible for the security systems of a bank that is about to merge with another large company.The trouble begins when a bad maloso incarnated by a great Paul Bettany, examines the lives of him and his family to kidnap them and control them better and thus be able to take advantage of knowledge of Stanfield (Ford).The film is based on the kidnapping and blackmail to a main character who is willing to do it to protect his family. However, the patience of the protagonist reaches a limit and the same reason why becomes victim becomes his trump card to win. It has some resemblance with rescue, we. And that is when we see Harrison that we wanted and we were waiting for. Accompanies Virginia Madsen making wife; from between cups it is already requested. And with good reason. The script is also riddled with moderately clever situations and with a more refined but effective cruelty that take a few good actors with utmost credibility.Although the technical aspect of the film will probably be unlikely (Malaciencia can have a post), the message of the film is quite clear: the firewall without human control does not help. The technology can be used in thousands of ways and can help us to achieve thousands of things, but always end up in the hands of the humans. Unless is fulfilled the prophecy of Terminator.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4104

Javier G. Pasamón

Pequeña miss sunshine

muchocine

The perfect definition of the film would be telefílmica tragicomedy. Typical film that both like at Sundance and so little to the cultivated spectator. An example of bad independent cinema.

and this is the film of the year? Juas! In part, and although not reaching those limits, I pointed to the case of the film-nonsense "Monster", a telefilm that was intended to impersonate an indie film, when in reality, was full of mediocrity on all sides, including realization and performances, I am among those who think that the overacting of Theron is so monstrous as her character.Do not be fooled, "little Miss Sunshine', is not or the jewel which intend to sell, not even a good independent film;" It is nice, but little else. Also that a server still does not understand how this telefilm (Yes, because complies with many of the parameters that characterize them) has been able to achieve important awards in festivals of a supposed prestigious as Sundance or San Sebastian and what one takes you to rethink as they are configured the jury of festivals, because lately they seem to be not isolated cases (see a few years ago as "directors" as Michael Moore earned the Palme d'Or) (in Cannes snatching her injustísimamente to Park Chan-Wook or go no further, about this last year in Sitges, a list of winners or Christ understood in some sections).Going back to our "Dear" pinicula, the same if it isn't more than a road-movie, with an exaggerated style semi-indie, with camera in hand and all that stuff, they are fine if they are used to give a touch documentalist or realistic to the plot, see the exemplary use of the camera in hand in some sections of the excellent "being John Malkovich" or "Children of men", but Miss Sunshine are trying to trick the viewer that you see a gem of those indie sea of cool, when in reality, we are dealing with a telefilm of desktop, sympathetic but full of clichés, with extremely stereotypical characters and moments of most forced and implausible.And I think that the problem of this small production, is that is created and conceived as a Hollywood film, if I not mistaken, so is designed, and if they press me much, intended for the oscars or the ISA, because it contains more than one section extremely academic and oscaril aftertaste (and that has crime in a production that gives them groundbreaking indie).Also wanted to remind, that fabulous music from the film, is not properly a score (the part of M. Danna if), rather a virtually calcada variant of a disk of the fantastic Russian band DeVotchka, something like what did in his day Yann Tiersen with "Amélie" and his album previously released. The fact is that, Liev Schrieber already made use of this great band's music in the highly recommended "Everything is illuminated", with Elijah Wood's character.Apart from the tremendous and numerous failures that one has seen in a first viewing, not everything is evil in this small not great work, because it has characters geeks, poorly built and very untapped in some cases, but with some charm. They are not credible, their reactions are forced and not give the pego as "family dodgy Yankee of those that are broken and destroyed that there is little to do", but they fall in sympathy, that Yes, little else. The right end, gives a bit of hooliganism to the tape (already you needed after some mediocre 99 minutes) and resorted to a completely unexpected musical number that gives a touch of quality to the tape, because, with it, it calls into question all the previous footage and clearly expresses the nonsense of the trip itself, but you have served for many things (including rid of grandfather cocaínomano, or which the Nietzschean silent, after talk and already it can express and "discover" horrifying is the world and how bad that everything goes. what a novelty, dude!).Most remarkable of the film, the only thing should be, is so curious metaphor of the van, which should go up is all torn once, because they are all characters that are always at the limit of losing the last "train of life". They have up to life, must adapt and above all be accepted as they are. Self-esteem is the solution. It is the only success at level plot of the film, along with the final majo.Following in my zeal to discredit works tremendously overvalued, see my 'beloved' "Infiltrated" by Scorsese, "Little Miss Sunshine" squeaking me, and when something squeaking, as they would say here in catalunya, Malament rai!. Characters not be the cree or the Holy Pope, the role of the mother, so lacking in importance, adds absolutely nothing to the set, the roles of Kinnear (Incidentally, portraying if same as always) and his father are very poorly taken, badly constructed and inverosimiles. The rest, more or less on this path, therefore leads me to say that the small is that I most has fallen by grace, the more natural of all and that gives an overview to the rest, although without going clear and that pass in an indie film, sends eggs!.Something that surprised me very negatively, is untapped which is the character of Steve Carell, thought that between him and the boy would be a link of education or of deep reflection, and I find banal conversations and moments disappointing, and that Steve does not hurt, but of course, when you have a character so poor when could be very rich in nuances, and with less details a Seat Panda, little can be done.Formally, have not found me anything out of this world, what is more, I think that it follows the line of a cheap telefilm, but with actors in A series (or I think xD), because convinced me only the scenes of the trip with the bridges, which is not too original if we see some other roadmovie or video clips and little else.Anyway, little more can be said, only what I think child, therefore, nothing adult, nor in their approach or in their characters, and the worst is that it claims to be it and there is nothing that I remove more than proportion that a work has one iota of pretentiousness to achieve depth of absolute emptiness. That is something qualitative infimamente, wanting to be politically incorrect so gullible shaped, fails to fairly commendable results.Message for the defenders of the film: Lapidar me or take me to the stake if they want to, but these are my humble and incendiary views on film so justito. I want to tell you, I did not like and uds the over-value, feel me fabulous, this year plays this year that comes as another garbage of Ron Howard. This is the life.Luckily I always we remain Solondz, Payne or PTA among other true masters of the indie film, which make truth, not telefilms film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2715

Caty

La tierra de los muertos vivientes

muchocine

The land of the living dead is more than a horror film, is also a highly politicized speech and a sign of warning to the society and the directions it is taking.

After many years, George a. Romero (who revolutionized horror with his film "The night of the living dead"), came back with a new twist to his idea of the creatures than the rose to stardom: the zombies, and this time, taking on their side all the technological advances that the never had and helped quite this new delivery. Its protagonists the zombies are still slow, but so wild and butchers as always were in the hands of this director. Unlike the current films of the genre, Romero films are much more visceral and violent death is something more painful and more frightening, and that is one of the greatest merits of the director.In this installment, the Earth continues ever more dominated by zombies, and few humans who still resist, are confined in cities, which have become major fiefs enclosed by walls electrified and defended by armies. In the Centre of the city, in a luxurious Tower, are the rich, living isolated from the poor, who live close to the walls. Is the supply to these cities (food, clothing, etc.) carried out by highly trained and militia armed, in surrounding cities dominated by the dead? but things start to get complicated when one of the undead begins to reason, and initiates a kind of "revolution". What has changed with regard to previous films of the director is the degree of maturity of Romero, their dead are not just a few wild human flesh eaters, they begin to unite as a social class, who decides to fight, leaving advance only by issues of instinct, moving forward objectives. They learn to use weapons in their killings, making them more dangerous than they already were.Within militias, have the person concerned Cholo (John Leguizamo) and the honest Riley (Simon Baker), which have concepts completely different from how to deal with the zombies and about his own life in the city: while that Cholo dreams of moving to an apartment with the elite, Riley thought to flee to the North, where the man lived not ever and therefore free of undead? but on two of them, the character more interesting is developed by Dennis Hopper, of Kaufmann, owner of the tower where the rich live and which controls everything. This character represents the role of the economic elites and rich in contrast to the gross and severe reality of poverty and the misery that the vast majority of the world has to live. Phrases like "your will never be one of us" (this Cholo when he tells her that he wants to buy an apartment in the Tower) are perfect examples of how companies and countries try to mainly to the most poor.My conclusion on the works of Romero is that the man is not destroyed by the zombies, but by situations that originates the same human being: the deaths of the film are the result of acts performed by the same man and that happens in all films of the director. The proportion of four zombies portrayed in the film by humans is a sign that men are having an absolute success in his intentions of self-destruction. The main message is that we are immersed in a constant "bestialización", in a process of individualization ever more absurd, where on the other hand, the zombies become one, going to live in society.The land of the living dead is more than a horror film, is also a highly politicized speech and a sign of warning to the society and the directions it is taking.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/979

Enrique Colmena

El perfume

muchocine

Version with packaging, well narrated and performed, even a Dustin Hoffman we know have a tendency to the overacting.

The novel by Patrick Suskind "perfume" is one of the big titles of masses of 20th century literature; published in 1985, was an almost instant success, mainly because its subject matter was really innovative and stimulating: the history of an inclusero, born in the 18th century, equipped with Orleans of an unparalleled sense olfactory, what will use out of the hell of misery to which his humble cot had been confined to him; but the obsession to achieve the final perfume, one that would be able to go crazy love anyone who perceive it, also, will be in addition to the sense of his life, the need to kill to get it, obtaining each Virgin woman's body the essence of the thirteen basic perfumes. The director, the German Tom Tykwer, was announced a few years ago with its certainly more than funny and groundbreaking "run, Lola, run" (whose poor digestion by some, it is true, has spawned some other Monster; see, for example, "Crank: poison in the blood"), has become now the adapter film based on a novel that has had more boyfriends in the last two decades. Even the own Stanley Kubrick came from among their projects before his death. Did not win anything with imagine what could have done the perfectionist maniac (but to which adore both) of Kubrick with this juicy literary material; better to stick with what presents Tykwer, who is a very solid adaptation, perhaps sometime too much debt in the original text (does this voice, which, especially in the beginning, does not do any favors to the cinematographic language: another thing is it is very difficult to explain the story without resorting to it?), but in any case a version with packagingwell narrated and performed even by a Dustin Hoffman who we know has a tendency to the overacting, and more in a European production like this, in which he is the only star of global dimension. Tykwer leaves the most difficult subject that arise from the novel, how graceful offer images of odors, allowing the word of Suskind, in the literary reader Magin, columbrar the most extraordinary fragrances. The director and his writers opt for the formula to show the effects of these effluents, since stricto sensu aromas can be displayed: the discovery of the Nirvana by the protagonist to smell its first female on the streets; the total and absolute orgy from the scene of the alleged execution of the murderer; the physical eventual demise, the closest thing to a bride in search of love. It is not bad formula, especially until that Odoroma, that invention of joke that took John Waters manga already makes the stack years, is not sophisticated enough? Another thing is that, perhaps for the sake of not receiving restrictive qualifications of the censors, the authors of the film have opted a pudibundez in the nude certainly shocking: while the bodies inánimes of the thirteen maidens, and hundreds of naked bodies appear in a square in the penultimate scene appear, what is sex itself does not appear virtually nonefor which has been resorted to more characteristic of buskers to actors or Extras acrobatics? Finally, the rampant Sanctimony, in cases like this is more striking than the presence, with total naturalness of sex of those that appear on the screen.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3698

Andrés Pons

Night of the Demons

muchocine

A script that repeated step by step all the rules of these films showing a good catalogue of ass, tits, sex, some gore, humor, action and characters we know from memory: the tough guy, the virginal girl, the Gothic, the banner or the clueless shift.

The night of the demons in his Spanish title was one of the most popular films of the 1980s, a real success of video store that I originated a couple of sequels.Specialist KEVIN TENNEY to a couple of years earlier triumph with WICTHBOARD diabolical game said this way are both second consecutive which undoubtedly entrenched it in the series b. A shame that his career deflate with little entity in the notable works the peacemaker or forbidden basement.Among a cast of little-known names highlighted one of the great Queens of the genus view LINNEA QUIGLEY sexy in crepozoides or fun night of zombies among many others.A script that repeated step by step all the rules of these films showing a good catalog of ass, tits, sex, something GORE, Humor, action and characters that everyone we knows memory, i.e. the tough guy, the virginal girl, Gothic, the banner or the clueless on duty.That certainly makes it different between many products cut by the same employer are really notable technical aspects to the budget which is usually handled in these productions.Makeup, music, photography and a simply great credit titles coupled with a good rhythm of the action at all times is achieved a form of entertainment in a fun film that knows what he wants to give and gives it with a note of series b more sympathetic of the 1980s.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/335

Tito Chinchan

Los liantes

muchocine

Another film jewel of this trio of luxury, that view forward may cause more laughs than any current comedy.

They are no longer posters as the yesteryear. Synthesis of the movie in that small box. Esteso and Pajares tied by a few wives with a roulette as the background table. We already know that it will play. And below, for those who were not aware, Roulette, a beach, and a comic drawing of the fashionable couple pursue two young girls. But with the exception that are the Spanish deck cards. Boundless subtlety from the poster.The film is about a few types, Amador (Pajares), Fidel (Esteso) and Eduardo (Ozores) that survive in the Costa del Sol messing people. They spend the whole day scheming on the best scam, until that happens the definitive thymus is Amador overlook a man elephant (which gives lucky roulette players) and a millionaire you part of your winnings. All conveniently dotted with women in balls and refined comments that more can we ask?Well, again joins the climactic trio of dandruff in Spanish to give birth to a film that hardly will go down in the annals of history. The beginning is very good, very funny and witty scenes. To highlight the nonsense of the tunnel of washing, that seemed very good to me. Then the thing goes Lachey, as they come to the casino, with cruel on crossed and similar jokes. The end rectifies a little astray which had taken, but not too much. It has many jokes, grumosos most, sexist, racist and in bad taste, but with its funny point. In addition, a number of women seem to bare more than unnecessary naked, touching everywhere do not if not reinforce the storyline of the film.In short, another film jewel of this trio of luxury, that view forward can cause more laughs than any current comedy. And there are young girls in cuericos. Besitos.P.D: "I this see it blond, because I see it very black" they say while they despelotan two girls to make them the photo of the driver's license.Pd2: Many references policies there is, I was very surprised.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2632

Dragon negro

Planet Terror

muchocine

Planet Terror is like a bad joke that always explain with your friends and that always makes grace and understood among that small group who knows that going while the rest of people looks strange and are wondering where her pussy this grace if the joke is old and bad.

They already warned us that the GrindHouse project was intended to recover the essence and spirit of the films of serie B, and since then that Robert Rodriguez has succeeded with this first film that has reached us. Planet Terror tells us as a species of virus begins to infect the population becoming a human blood thirsty zombies, we, the typical movie of zombies, but in this case as last thread and so absurd that one cannot applaud such audacity to make a bizarrada so much fun like this.And is that if something is Planet Terror is that at no time taken seriously if same, and the director takes the opportunity to get scenes of action, already not impossible, but completely unthinkable, dialogues to which more jam and some memorable phrases stuck with shoehorn and meaningless, and above all a mise en scene and a deliberately crappy and homemade special effects. Until the actors acting badly on purpose, and also note that it has a couple of memorable cameos.Such prospect one not surprising that the commercial failure has been sound and is Planet Terror is like a bad joke that always explain with your friends and that always makes grace and understood among that small group who knows that going while the rest of people looks strange and are wondering where her pussy this grace if the joke is old and bad. So is this film a bad joke that only fans to the genre will know understand, find grace and enjoy it as what is a bad film, but which in reality is not, because that is what you want to be, and here is where lies his greatness. It is clear, that which it approaches the film without much idea of what going to see and expects to see a topical action or horror film and is confronted with such nonsense, because it is normal to not make him or fucking grace, and is that surely not he has learned that goes the joke.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1188

Kiko de España

María Antonieta

muchocine

Good. He said that you history or better said, the story is unimportant. This will of parties, champagne, strawberries, dogs and excesses in general, not forget that it begins with a punk theme. Epopca.

Marie Antoinette is a movie by Sofia Coppola. The Virgin suicides and Lost in translation were movies of Sofia Coppola.¿No said you nothing? Not you they liked? It then passes the French Queen, because it is more of the same.When do you Ding, (to my did me, especially the second), you will spend it great watching the show of "girl do woman?" which marks the pair Coppola/Dunst at the expense of the historical personaje.¿Recordais Clueless (out of wave)? Because Marie Antoinette are you feel much: it is the story of a rich and capricious girl to which all give a shit and thinks only of hairdressers and shoemakers. And well endowed Swedish soldiers, heroes of war to be.At historic level the film NO APORTA absolutely nothing, but is that the story is unimportant in the film. And I thank you, despite the two hours because, do you imagine a Marie Antoinette of, for example, Anthony Minghella, with its 214 minutes?Good. He said that you history or better said, the story is unimportant. This will of parties, champagne, strawberries, dogs and excesses in general, not forget that it begins with a punk theme (by the way, I love its beginning and its end) and with a map of the Dunst you entering a desire to get off the seat and skip the screen...Shows that the movie does not go anything which will take an hour and peak in show as it bored the Queen and then in a seen and unseen events precipitate using an ellipsis as heavy, especially that of the birth of their offspring.The case is that I I I passed big during the greater part of the footage because I like as tells me things this woman specialist in placing the camera next to the vetanilla of all car or wagon, either in Japan or at Versailles, or because it uses music in an exemplary fashion and leaving a few all-star lying on the floor, the Parrot. I'm not going to deny that the burst of Marie Antoinette. "Marie Antoinette farmer" is about to throw rushing everything, but it is then it recovers. And I love the end. UPS, that it had already said.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3447

Tito Chinchan

Pitch Black

muchocine

Film about a guy named Riddick that falls on a planet where darkness brings some bugs to picnic. Extremely original, it leaves open many doors in the face to sequels and prequels, which makes semi cult film. Very recomedable.

Vin Diesel this has me fried. Mira that my medium Zucchini does not like these movies of guys grips, but it turns out that this guy if. That if very well, is that if patatin if potatoes. Continue making movies, I I take a plane and escupo you in the eyes (not pretendereis two hosts that you stick to the handles of this makes me a knot). Heh, heh, certainly me are cool movies of this bag of muscles.The film is about one more distant future, in which a shipload of settlers which are directed toward a take on the left ass falls on a more arid than the monegros planet. In "travelers" is also a serial killer named Riddick, and a bounty hunter that leads the way to prison. Total, which once reach the planet see than the previous settlers - geologists came out too hasty, given the two Suns light do be never at night and that there is a kind of Giant Anteaters that give something of resentment.What most surprised of this film is its originality, with its toquecillo of fear, its share of humor, its good dose of action and the baton which can establish the principle of "who come alive?". Vin Diesel is within these grips actors, of those who operate better, with always very similar roles, in which fits perfectly. I like that he invents a world and outlines it, leaving things in the air in order to make other stories concerning this sinister place. It has a bug of these script, as for example bugs that go years without eating suddenly die of starvation, but more serious things we have swallowed.In short, film about a guy named Riddick that falls on a planet where the dark scary light given out some bugs to picnic. Extremely original, it leaves open many unknowns facing sequels and prequels, which makes semi cult film. Highly recommended.Besitos.P.D: Mola mazo tron, which read years ago.Pd2: I do not understand how he had so few viewers.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/295

Bloody Will

La sombra de la sospecha

muchocine

He had seen hundreds and hundreds of times in other films of the own Douglas, or the last of Harrison Ford, it begins to make merits to be bland in this decade.

The worst enemy of this film is the release date. Premiered in the USA in may, and better you iria the box office if you driving in October here in Spain. Have they decided no, and I think that you did you a favor?.I'm going to go: Michael Douglas is Pete Garrison, a veteran agent of the secret service responsible for the safety of the omipotente Mr. President of the USA, but when it is discovered that there is a "mole" within the body of agents, everyone is suspicious of everyone, and the Garrison agent desfallecerá to find the traitor. All this, along with the veteran agent run also Kiefer Sutherland, director of research at the service, and Eva Longoria, rookie agent recommended by the protagonist. Kim Basinger plays the first lady, who doesn't have much to say in this plot.The truth is that it is difficult to anticipate more argument, because the little "surprise factor" which owns the film, takes place precisely in the first 30 minutes. I'm going to be good and not chafaré the movie if someone decides to see her (best when Miss in the plus). But if you notice the following: from the half hour, nothing. And I say nothing because the rest of the film had already seen. He had seen hundreds and hundreds of times in other films of the own Douglas, or the last of Harrison Ford, it begins to make merits to be bland in this decade. And hey, you also her haven't seen, because the plot, after those early surprises of the principle, becomes a succession of situations that have been recreated endlessly by the film, and even the TV movies on Saturdays at 15: 30 of Antena 3. Nothing helps, by the way, that its director who carried the "Swat" screen "The men of Harrelson", that really seems a masterpiece next to it, and therefore repeats identical scheme of action, and in some moments, even in the history.I am not going to say that I like Michael Douglas, but I must say that in this film returns to drawing the same character in "Ni una palabra" and even that "Perfect crime", and with this I mean that their faces and gestures of concern or anger are identical in all these films. It is already very far away his impeccable "Wall Street" Gordon Gekko, and is that with the time Douglas has lost the charisma to finish playing characters very, but very flat.Perhaps the best is Kiefer Sutherland. Of this kind if I can say that I never liked. Up made me hate "Line Mortal", however I I've swallowed each and every one of the episodes of "24". While it is true that here Sutherland takes the protagonist of the series, Jack Bauer, and so calca to detail, is therefore truer that it makes a tontorrón to which Mr. Douglas will give a lesson of how being a good American secret service agent. At least it is the only when you wielding the gun makes it without resemble Woody Allen.De females what to say. As always, when a film comes to rest, and secret agents all ladies are intended to mourn the death of the hero or at palmarla as soon as possible so the prota copper revenge to the beast. Here not even that. "Eva Longoria, hiperfamosa to be the Sra Solis on"Desperate housewives"as well as megarepetidos cosmetic spots", appears in the film to attract unwary that they are created will wear outfits like that it looks in the TV series, and that they will see something pissed that their presence on screen share is lower than knowledge in Geophysics of Van Damme. Of Kim Basinger better not think. Were it not for, in my opinion, overrated "L.A. confidential" this woman would be now announcing on TV sauna belts at 5 in the morning. Say your paper, simply, there is no role.When said at the beginning that best release in October, I was just referring to one plot at base requeteconocida and some interpretations rather than manidas, seems to me difficult that you can raise some minimally acceptable at this time for this type of americanadas.The penalty is that if I was premiered in October and surrounded by Spanish films, is lining!.! The film is as well.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4365

elprimerhombre

Taxi driver

muchocine

Each sequence, stage or level deserves a punto y aparte. The camera uses slow travelling and camera moves that only an author as Scorsese could make.

Elprimerhombre and Columbia Pictures presented to Robert de Niro in Taxi Driver, directed by Martin Scorsese. Of the penumbra, as emerged from the darkness, appears between smoke which dissipates the taxi of Travis Bickle (De Niro). If you want to carry them to the Bronx, Brooklyn or Harlem, they only have to climb your taxi. Let yourself be carried away by such as beautiful drawings of New York shot from the same car and relax with great soundtrack of Bernard Herrmann. "All the animals out at night." Whores, macarro, thugs, ladybugs, lesbians, drogatas, junkies. Sick, corrupt. "One day rain of truth and will clean this scum off the streets." (Actual words of the voiceover of Travis Bickle). In principle, to run a film must be knot, development and outcome, i.e., that every time something that impacts the Viewer, to invite him to stay in his seat, always without losing the thread of the story happens. And this movie not only manages this, but goes far beyond. Paul Schrader, the author of the plot, gives us a script subtly structured, with findings to the 10 minutes to half an hour, about the 50 minute and before reaching the final. Each sequence, stage or level deserves a punto y aparte. The camera uses slow travelling and camera moves that only an author as Scorsese could make. He himself appears in the film twice: the first time watching seated to Cybill Shepherd, who is Betsy, the girl that invites Bickle to leave at the beginning of the film, and the second time being a client of Binckle. This role should have done another actor but in the end it was not possible and decided to do it himself. "Solitude I has followed all my life, everywhere." In bars, in cars, on the sidewalks, stores, everywhere. There is no escape. I am the lonely man of God "("God's_Lonely_Man",_es_una_obra_de_Thomas_Wolfe)." During the film, the character of Binckle is going crazy, is changing into something that is scary. Days after having bought a 44 Magnum, a 38 short, a Colt 25 automatic and a Walther 380, she faces in the mirror, as if he retara to someone telling him: "are You talking to me?." You talking to me? "(" do I say to me?...")"("Do I say to me?"). From that scene, people often imitate De Niro gesticulating and saying that, as Javier Bardem in the mouth movie. Paul Schrader made the script in a rather critical moment of his life. He had separated from his wife and had no where to live. He slept in his car or once at home of his ex-girlfriend. I didn't know what to do with his life. Then came up the character of the taxi driver as a metaphor for the loneliness of man. He chose the name of Travis Bickle because it has a point poetic and hard at the same time. "Travis" comes from the English term "travel", as a wandering. And "Bickle" comes from "bicker", which means "discuss". In short, this movie is huge and a unique experience. You're sad or happy, looking at these images you transported to another world, another kind of life. If for me, I could see this film today again, but I will leave to spend time. Sure that I like even more the next time. And, do a favor, see in subtitled original version. Bernard Herrmann, composer, known especially for the music for films by Hitchcock as Vertigo or psychosis, died at the end of the recording of this soundtrack. This film just recalling his figure. A greeting!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1151

Emilio Calvo de Mora

María Antonieta

muchocine

Tristísima loneliness of the Queen becomes Crassus experiment result eccentric. The vicissitudes of the argument, in short, nor convince: lost in the sewing of the costumes in the brightness of the lamps.

What speaks in Marie Antoinette is the glorious preamble of the French Revolution, a milestone in the history of mankind, episode where the reason debate his bitter fight against his monsters, but language by Soffia Coppola traviste Convention, they trivialize and stands as a vulgar fireworks show that, in other hands petardería, it had been a symphony with an orchestral mass overwhelming, sublime, with its artifice, coherent, lyric. There is nothing that in this exercise of the daughter of the master marketing Francis Ford. Marie Antoinette is not, however, a bad film. Alone in the dark, I had unbearable sin or capricho de see makes a few nights, it is big sumo. The pseudobiográfico film of this girl turned into Queen from their Waltz Austria until the burning Paris of ideas sacrifice psychological depth of characters, by strength, rich, for the sake of provoking (and succeeds) with doses mayestáticas glamour, as if everything out, deviniese a long (two hours) video to MTV as that great of Queen called It's a hard life.Kirsten Dunst, infante, the Queen is willful, delicately chic, abandoned as a Chair refined in a classroom presentation, never better written, happily unstable in their world of protocols, wigs and costumes of 50 kilos, efficient under his hairstyle of printing.The character, lowered to banal adorno, attends to a coming and going of time tables, seasoned by a unusual wire music, provocative and enjoyable, but clearly inappropriate.Is not, under any circumstances, an update a day (necessary) the gender even though we have placed so many hopes in the confidence that Soffia Coppola, view Lost in translation, was going to make a film of greater nombradía, limited to build a unbearable by baroque painting of time, without background in the latest commercial cinema, made with Audacity, but wrongheaded, subordinating it all to the sound of sequinsto the appalling Palace that we see a thousand times, shot in disconcerting and beautiful angles. Tristísima loneliness of the Queen, his escoramiento to a modern profile of fémina submitted by strict conventions of society, is in Crassus experiment result eccentric. The vicissitudes of the argument, in short, nor convince: lost in the sewing of the costumes in the brightness of the lamps.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3746

Ana Belén Pacheco

La vida es bella

muchocine

A gem that the longer is more enjoy.

I like to say that Roberto Benigni is the Italian Tom Hanks. I guess it may sound crazy but if we start to analyze it coldly the thing makes sense. Both were the real precursors of comedy in their countries, were tapes of success which marked a whole generation and were imitated by comedians coming. With the 1990s decided to become serious and Hanks found papers that would give prestige and Oscars and Benigni played along by also placing behind the camera. I.e. life is Bella is the Forest Gump of Begnini.En Europe we laughed not of war. They say that to see things in perspective there must be many years and while on World War II dramas and action tapes are well seen and enjoyed some popularity by making fun of Jews massacred by the Holocaust seemed very risky.Life is Bella is a species of fairy tale with a moral. It's a comedy sui generis which Guido tries to stay in the field of concentration for his son, Giouse, pass much lighter inventing games and stories. I admit that there are few things that I love in life is beautiful. It is a tape that distills some magic in overwhelming of any alleged guerra.por realism and the brutality his wife Nicoletta Braschi plays Dora, or Principessa as the flame affectionately.And clear the awards did not wait. There is still marked on the retinae the face of terror of the poor Steven Spielberg that was little fortunate to sit in the seat prior to the Italian comic when it decided to celebrate her Oscar for best actor jumping on the public. An Oscar deserved but controversial because Benigni portraying if same as demonstrated in his subsequent speech where many gave thanks for our mediocre and moderate English.The penalty is after life is beautiful decided plagiarizing himself, and of course, the public is stupid but there is a limit and about Pinochio (never released in Spain) and the Tiger and the snow we ended up convince that perhaps the Italian Tom Hanks going big this filmmaking with uppercase. At least left us this gem that the longer is more enjoyable.PS. I will not fail to tell an anecdote about the germ of the idea of Begnini. At the press conference for the presentation of the "EL train DE LA VIDA", released several years despupero that came out the same year 98. He is a French Jewish people that with the imminent arrival of the nazis decide to do pass by Germans and cross Europe to a safe place. Oddly does not have much that see the tone, the action and narrated adventure if they have mucos commonalities with La Vida es Bella. When asked about the similarities its director explained that in his attempt to get funding sent his screenplay to Begnini and even offered a role in the film, this turned him down, two years wrote, starred in and directed the life is beautiful. If you enjoyed the work of Benigni, please, I encourage you to seek this French production which is equally fun but also corrects errors of Sanctimony and floral ornaments of the Italian. I believe that you will enjoy.