metadata
base_model: Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-m
library_name: sentence-transformers
metrics:
- cosine_accuracy@1
- cosine_accuracy@3
- cosine_accuracy@5
- cosine_accuracy@10
- cosine_precision@1
- cosine_precision@3
- cosine_precision@5
- cosine_precision@10
- cosine_recall@1
- cosine_recall@3
- cosine_recall@5
- cosine_recall@10
- cosine_ndcg@10
- cosine_mrr@10
- cosine_map@100
- dot_accuracy@1
- dot_accuracy@3
- dot_accuracy@5
- dot_accuracy@10
- dot_precision@1
- dot_precision@3
- dot_precision@5
- dot_precision@10
- dot_recall@1
- dot_recall@3
- dot_recall@5
- dot_recall@10
- dot_ndcg@10
- dot_mrr@10
- dot_map@100
pipeline_tag: sentence-similarity
tags:
- sentence-transformers
- sentence-similarity
- feature-extraction
- generated_from_trainer
- dataset_size:568
- loss:MatryoshkaLoss
- loss:MultipleNegativesRankingLoss
widget:
- source_sentence: >-
What measures did the device manufacturer take to protect individuals from
unwanted tracking?
sentences:
- >-
Tailored to the target of the explanation. Explanations should be
targeted to specific audiences and clearly state that audience. An
explanation provided to the subject of a decision might differ from one
provided to an advocate, or to a domain expert or decision maker.
Tailoring should be assessed (e.g., via user experience research).
43
NOTICE &
EXPLANATION
WHAT SHOULD BE EXPECTED OF AUTOMATED SYSTEMS
The expectations for automated systems are meant to serve as a blueprint
for the development of additional
technical standards and practices that are tailored for particular
sectors and contexts.
Tailored to the level of risk. An assessment should be done to determine
the level of risk of the auto -
- >-
7
• A device originally developed to help people track and find lost items
has been used as a tool by stalkers to trackvictims’ locations in
violation of their privacy and safet y. The device manufacturer took
steps after release to
protect people from unwanted tracking by alerting people on their phones
when a device is found to be movingwith them over time and also by
having the device make an occasional noise, but not all phones are
ableto receive the notification and the devices remain a safety concern
due to their misuse.
8
- >-
-
sonable expectations in a given context and with a focus on ensuring
broad accessibility and protecting the public from especially harm
-
ful impacts. In some cases, a human or other alternative may be re -
quired by law. You should have access to timely human consider -
ation and remedy by a fallback and escalation process if an automat -
ed system fails, it produces an error, or you would like to appeal or
contest its impacts on you. Human consideration and fallback should be
accessible, equitable, effective, maintained, accompanied by appropriate
operator training, and should not impose an unrea
-
- source_sentence: >-
Why is ongoing monitoring and mitigation important for automated systems
after deployment?
sentences:
- >-
-
test its impacts on you
Proportionate. The availability of human consideration and fallback,
along with associated training and
safeguards against human bias, should be proportionate to the potential
of the automated system to meaning -
fully impact rights, opportunities, or access. Automated systems that
have greater control over outcomes, provide input to high-stakes
decisions, relate to sensitive domains, or otherwise have a greater
potential to meaningfully impact rights, opportunities, or access should
have greater availability (e.g., staffing) and over
-
sight of human consideration and fallback mechanisms.
Accessible. Mechanisms for human consideration and fallback, whether
in-person, on paper, by phone, or
- >-
algorithmic discrimination, avoid meaningful harm, and achieve equity
goals.
Ongoing monitoring and mitigation. Automated systems should be regularly
monitored to assess algo -
rithmic discrimination that might arise from unforeseen interactions of
the system with inequities not accounted for during the pre-deployment
testing, changes to the system after deployment, or changes to the
context of use or associated data. Monitoring and disparity assessment
should be performed by the entity deploying or using the automated
system to examine whether the system has led to algorithmic discrimina
-
- >-
The expectations for automated systems are meant to serve as a blueprint
for the development of additional
technical standards and practices that are tailored for particular
sectors and contexts.
Ongoing monitoring. Automated systems should have ongoing monitoring
procedures, including recalibra -
tion procedures, in place to ensure that their performance does not fall
below an acceptable level over time,
based on changing real-world conditions or deployment contexts,
post-deployment modification, or unexpect -
- source_sentence: >-
What should be included in the measurement of the impact of risks
associated with automated systems?
sentences:
- >-
104
48
HUMAN ALTERNATIVES,
CONSIDERATION, AND
FALLBACK
WHAT SHOULD BE EXPECTED OF AUTOMATED SYSTEMS
The expectations for automated systems are meant to serve as a blueprint
for the development of additional
technical standards and practices that are tailored for particular
sectors and contexts.
An automated system should provide demonstrably effective mechanisms to
opt out in favor of a human alterna -
tive, where appropriate, as well as timely human consideration and
remedy by a fallback system, with additional
human oversight and safeguards for systems used in sensitive domains,
and with training and assessment for any human-based portions of the
system to ensure effectiveness.
- >-
collection and use is legal and consistent with the expectations of the
people whose data is collected. User experience research should be
conducted to confirm that people understand what data is being collected
about them and how it will be used, and that this collection matches
their expectations and desires.
- >-
-
surement of the impact of risks should be included and balanced such
that high impact risks receive attention and mitigation proportionate
with those impacts. Automated systems with the intended purpose of
violating the safety of others should not be developed or used; systems
with such safety violations as identified unin
-
tended consequences should not be used until the risk can be mitigated.
Ongoing risk mitigation may necessi -
tate rollback or significant modification to a launched automated
system.
18
SAFE AND EFFECTIVE
SYSTEMS
WHAT SHOULD BE EXPECTED OF AUTOMATED SYSTEMS
The expectations for automated systems are meant to serve as a blueprint
for the development of additional
- source_sentence: >-
What measures should be taken to avoid "mission creep" when identifying
goals for data collection?
sentences:
- >-
narrow identified goals, to avoid "mission creep." Anticipated data
collection should be determined to be strictly necessary to the
identified goals and should be minimized as much as possible. Data
collected based on these identified goals and for a specific context
should not be used in a different context without assessing for new
privacy risks and implementing appropriate mitigation measures, which
may include express consent. Clear timelines for data retention should
be established, with data deleted as soon as possible in accordance with
legal or policy-based limitations. Determined data retention timelines
should be documented and justi
-
fied.
- >-
with more and more companies tracking the behavior of the American
public, building individual profiles based on this data, and using this
granular-level information as input into automated systems that further
track, profile, and impact the American public. Government agencies,
particularly law enforcement agencies, also use and help develop a
variety of technologies that enhance and expand surveillance
capabilities, which similarly collect data used as input into other
automated systems that directly impact people’s lives. Federal law has
not grown to address the expanding scale of private data collection, or
of the ability of governments at all levels to access that data and
leverage the means of private collection.
- >-
additional technical standards and practices that should be tailored for
particular sectors and contexts. While
existing laws informed the development of the Blueprint for an AI Bill
of Rights, this framework does not detail those laws beyond providing
them as examples, where appropriate, of existing protective measures.
This framework instead shares a broad, forward-leaning vision of
recommended principles for automated system development and use to
inform private and public involvement with these systems where they have
the poten-tial to meaningfully impact rights, opportunities, or access.
Additionall y, this framework does not analyze or
- source_sentence: >-
What types of data are considered sensitive according to the context
provided?
sentences:
- >-
Provide the public with mechanisms for appropriate and meaningful
consent, access, and
control over their data
Use-specific consent. Consent practices should not allow for abusive
surveillance practices. Where data
collectors or automated systems seek consent, they should seek it for
specific, narrow use contexts, for specif -
ic time durations, and for use by specific entities. Consent should not
extend if any of these conditions change; consent should be re-acquired
before using data if the use case changes, a time limit elapses, or data
is trans
-
- >-
and home, work, or school environmental data); or have the reasonable
potential to be used in ways that are likely to expose individuals to
meaningful harm, such as a loss of privacy or financial harm due to
identity theft. Data and metadata generated by or about those who are
not yet legal adults is also sensitive, even if not related to a
sensitive domain. Such data includes, but is not limited to, numerical,
text, image, audio, or video data. “Sensitive domains” are those in
which activities being conducted can cause material harms, including
signifi
- >-
that data to inform the results of the automated system and why such use
will not violate any applicable laws.
In cases of high-dimensional and/or derived attributes, such
justifications can be provided as overall
descriptions of the attribute generation process and appropriateness.
19
SAFE AND EFFECTIVE
SYSTEMS
WHAT SHOULD BE EXPECTED OF AUTOMATED SYSTEMS
The expectations for automated systems are meant to serve as a blueprint
for the development of additional
technical standards and practices that are tailored for particular
sectors and contexts.
Derived data sources tracked and reviewed carefully. Data that is
derived from other data through
model-index:
- name: SentenceTransformer based on Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-m
results:
- task:
type: information-retrieval
name: Information Retrieval
dataset:
name: Unknown
type: unknown
metrics:
- type: cosine_accuracy@1
value: 0.7677725118483413
name: Cosine Accuracy@1
- type: cosine_accuracy@3
value: 0.8862559241706162
name: Cosine Accuracy@3
- type: cosine_accuracy@5
value: 0.9241706161137441
name: Cosine Accuracy@5
- type: cosine_accuracy@10
value: 0.981042654028436
name: Cosine Accuracy@10
- type: cosine_precision@1
value: 0.7677725118483413
name: Cosine Precision@1
- type: cosine_precision@3
value: 0.29541864139020535
name: Cosine Precision@3
- type: cosine_precision@5
value: 0.1848341232227488
name: Cosine Precision@5
- type: cosine_precision@10
value: 0.0981042654028436
name: Cosine Precision@10
- type: cosine_recall@1
value: 0.7677725118483413
name: Cosine Recall@1
- type: cosine_recall@3
value: 0.8862559241706162
name: Cosine Recall@3
- type: cosine_recall@5
value: 0.9241706161137441
name: Cosine Recall@5
- type: cosine_recall@10
value: 0.981042654028436
name: Cosine Recall@10
- type: cosine_ndcg@10
value: 0.8716745978729181
name: Cosine Ndcg@10
- type: cosine_mrr@10
value: 0.8371304445948993
name: Cosine Mrr@10
- type: cosine_map@100
value: 0.838229587684564
name: Cosine Map@100
- type: dot_accuracy@1
value: 0.7677725118483413
name: Dot Accuracy@1
- type: dot_accuracy@3
value: 0.8862559241706162
name: Dot Accuracy@3
- type: dot_accuracy@5
value: 0.9241706161137441
name: Dot Accuracy@5
- type: dot_accuracy@10
value: 0.981042654028436
name: Dot Accuracy@10
- type: dot_precision@1
value: 0.7677725118483413
name: Dot Precision@1
- type: dot_precision@3
value: 0.29541864139020535
name: Dot Precision@3
- type: dot_precision@5
value: 0.1848341232227488
name: Dot Precision@5
- type: dot_precision@10
value: 0.0981042654028436
name: Dot Precision@10
- type: dot_recall@1
value: 0.7677725118483413
name: Dot Recall@1
- type: dot_recall@3
value: 0.8862559241706162
name: Dot Recall@3
- type: dot_recall@5
value: 0.9241706161137441
name: Dot Recall@5
- type: dot_recall@10
value: 0.981042654028436
name: Dot Recall@10
- type: dot_ndcg@10
value: 0.8716745978729181
name: Dot Ndcg@10
- type: dot_mrr@10
value: 0.8371304445948993
name: Dot Mrr@10
- type: dot_map@100
value: 0.838229587684564
name: Dot Map@100
SentenceTransformer based on Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-m
This is a sentence-transformers model finetuned from Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-m. It maps sentences & paragraphs to a 768-dimensional dense vector space and can be used for semantic textual similarity, semantic search, paraphrase mining, text classification, clustering, and more.
Model Details
Model Description
- Model Type: Sentence Transformer
- Base model: Snowflake/snowflake-arctic-embed-m
- Maximum Sequence Length: 512 tokens
- Output Dimensionality: 768 tokens
- Similarity Function: Cosine Similarity
Model Sources
- Documentation: Sentence Transformers Documentation
- Repository: Sentence Transformers on GitHub
- Hugging Face: Sentence Transformers on Hugging Face
Full Model Architecture
SentenceTransformer(
(0): Transformer({'max_seq_length': 512, 'do_lower_case': False}) with Transformer model: BertModel
(1): Pooling({'word_embedding_dimension': 768, 'pooling_mode_cls_token': True, 'pooling_mode_mean_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_max_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_mean_sqrt_len_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_weightedmean_tokens': False, 'pooling_mode_lasttoken': False, 'include_prompt': True})
(2): Normalize()
)
Usage
Direct Usage (Sentence Transformers)
First install the Sentence Transformers library:
pip install -U sentence-transformers
Then you can load this model and run inference.
from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
# Download from the 🤗 Hub
model = SentenceTransformer("sentence_transformers_model_id")
# Run inference
sentences = [
'What types of data are considered sensitive according to the context provided?',
'and home, work, or school environmental data); or have the reasonable potential to be used in ways that are likely to expose individuals to meaningful harm, such as a loss of privacy or financial harm due to identity theft. Data and metadata generated by or about those who are not yet legal adults is also sensitive, even if not related to a sensitive domain. Such data includes, but is not limited to, numerical, text, image, audio, or video data. “Sensitive domains” are those in which activities being conducted can cause material harms, including signifi',
'Provide the public with mechanisms for appropriate and meaningful consent, access, and \ncontrol over their data \nUse-specific consent. Consent practices should not allow for abusive surveillance practices. Where data \ncollectors or automated systems seek consent, they should seek it for specific, narrow use contexts, for specif -\nic time durations, and for use by specific entities. Consent should not extend if any of these conditions change; consent should be re-acquired before using data if the use case changes, a time limit elapses, or data is trans\n-',
]
embeddings = model.encode(sentences)
print(embeddings.shape)
# [3, 768]
# Get the similarity scores for the embeddings
similarities = model.similarity(embeddings, embeddings)
print(similarities.shape)
# [3, 3]
Evaluation
Metrics
Information Retrieval
- Evaluated with
InformationRetrievalEvaluator
Metric | Value |
---|---|
cosine_accuracy@1 | 0.7678 |
cosine_accuracy@3 | 0.8863 |
cosine_accuracy@5 | 0.9242 |
cosine_accuracy@10 | 0.981 |
cosine_precision@1 | 0.7678 |
cosine_precision@3 | 0.2954 |
cosine_precision@5 | 0.1848 |
cosine_precision@10 | 0.0981 |
cosine_recall@1 | 0.7678 |
cosine_recall@3 | 0.8863 |
cosine_recall@5 | 0.9242 |
cosine_recall@10 | 0.981 |
cosine_ndcg@10 | 0.8717 |
cosine_mrr@10 | 0.8371 |
cosine_map@100 | 0.8382 |
dot_accuracy@1 | 0.7678 |
dot_accuracy@3 | 0.8863 |
dot_accuracy@5 | 0.9242 |
dot_accuracy@10 | 0.981 |
dot_precision@1 | 0.7678 |
dot_precision@3 | 0.2954 |
dot_precision@5 | 0.1848 |
dot_precision@10 | 0.0981 |
dot_recall@1 | 0.7678 |
dot_recall@3 | 0.8863 |
dot_recall@5 | 0.9242 |
dot_recall@10 | 0.981 |
dot_ndcg@10 | 0.8717 |
dot_mrr@10 | 0.8371 |
dot_map@100 | 0.8382 |
Training Details
Training Dataset
Unnamed Dataset
- Size: 568 training samples
- Columns:
sentence_0
andsentence_1
- Approximate statistics based on the first 568 samples:
sentence_0 sentence_1 type string string details - min: 11 tokens
- mean: 19.09 tokens
- max: 36 tokens
- min: 22 tokens
- mean: 118.73 tokens
- max: 160 tokens
- Samples:
sentence_0 sentence_1 What is the purpose of the AI Bill of Rights mentioned in the context?
BLUEPRINT FOR AN
AI B ILL OF
RIGHTS
MAKING AUTOMATED
SYSTEMS WORK FOR
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
OCTOBER 2022When was the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights published?
BLUEPRINT FOR AN
AI B ILL OF
RIGHTS
MAKING AUTOMATED
SYSTEMS WORK FOR
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
OCTOBER 2022What is the purpose of the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights published by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy?
About this Document
The Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights: Making Automated Systems Work for the American People was
published by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy in October 2022. This framework was
released one year after OSTP announced the launch of a process to develop “a bill of rights for an AI-powered
world.” Its release follows a year of public engagement to inform this initiative. The framework is available
online at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights
About the Office of Science and Technology Policy
The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) was established by the National Science and Technology - Loss:
MatryoshkaLoss
with these parameters:{ "loss": "MultipleNegativesRankingLoss", "matryoshka_dims": [ 768, 512, 256, 128, 64 ], "matryoshka_weights": [ 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 ], "n_dims_per_step": -1 }
Training Hyperparameters
Non-Default Hyperparameters
eval_strategy
: stepsper_device_train_batch_size
: 20per_device_eval_batch_size
: 20num_train_epochs
: 10multi_dataset_batch_sampler
: round_robin
All Hyperparameters
Click to expand
overwrite_output_dir
: Falsedo_predict
: Falseeval_strategy
: stepsprediction_loss_only
: Trueper_device_train_batch_size
: 20per_device_eval_batch_size
: 20per_gpu_train_batch_size
: Noneper_gpu_eval_batch_size
: Nonegradient_accumulation_steps
: 1eval_accumulation_steps
: Nonetorch_empty_cache_steps
: Nonelearning_rate
: 5e-05weight_decay
: 0.0adam_beta1
: 0.9adam_beta2
: 0.999adam_epsilon
: 1e-08max_grad_norm
: 1num_train_epochs
: 10max_steps
: -1lr_scheduler_type
: linearlr_scheduler_kwargs
: {}warmup_ratio
: 0.0warmup_steps
: 0log_level
: passivelog_level_replica
: warninglog_on_each_node
: Truelogging_nan_inf_filter
: Truesave_safetensors
: Truesave_on_each_node
: Falsesave_only_model
: Falserestore_callback_states_from_checkpoint
: Falseno_cuda
: Falseuse_cpu
: Falseuse_mps_device
: Falseseed
: 42data_seed
: Nonejit_mode_eval
: Falseuse_ipex
: Falsebf16
: Falsefp16
: Falsefp16_opt_level
: O1half_precision_backend
: autobf16_full_eval
: Falsefp16_full_eval
: Falsetf32
: Nonelocal_rank
: 0ddp_backend
: Nonetpu_num_cores
: Nonetpu_metrics_debug
: Falsedebug
: []dataloader_drop_last
: Falsedataloader_num_workers
: 0dataloader_prefetch_factor
: Nonepast_index
: -1disable_tqdm
: Falseremove_unused_columns
: Truelabel_names
: Noneload_best_model_at_end
: Falseignore_data_skip
: Falsefsdp
: []fsdp_min_num_params
: 0fsdp_config
: {'min_num_params': 0, 'xla': False, 'xla_fsdp_v2': False, 'xla_fsdp_grad_ckpt': False}fsdp_transformer_layer_cls_to_wrap
: Noneaccelerator_config
: {'split_batches': False, 'dispatch_batches': None, 'even_batches': True, 'use_seedable_sampler': True, 'non_blocking': False, 'gradient_accumulation_kwargs': None}deepspeed
: Nonelabel_smoothing_factor
: 0.0optim
: adamw_torchoptim_args
: Noneadafactor
: Falsegroup_by_length
: Falselength_column_name
: lengthddp_find_unused_parameters
: Noneddp_bucket_cap_mb
: Noneddp_broadcast_buffers
: Falsedataloader_pin_memory
: Truedataloader_persistent_workers
: Falseskip_memory_metrics
: Trueuse_legacy_prediction_loop
: Falsepush_to_hub
: Falseresume_from_checkpoint
: Nonehub_model_id
: Nonehub_strategy
: every_savehub_private_repo
: Falsehub_always_push
: Falsegradient_checkpointing
: Falsegradient_checkpointing_kwargs
: Noneinclude_inputs_for_metrics
: Falseeval_do_concat_batches
: Truefp16_backend
: autopush_to_hub_model_id
: Nonepush_to_hub_organization
: Nonemp_parameters
:auto_find_batch_size
: Falsefull_determinism
: Falsetorchdynamo
: Noneray_scope
: lastddp_timeout
: 1800torch_compile
: Falsetorch_compile_backend
: Nonetorch_compile_mode
: Nonedispatch_batches
: Nonesplit_batches
: Noneinclude_tokens_per_second
: Falseinclude_num_input_tokens_seen
: Falseneftune_noise_alpha
: Noneoptim_target_modules
: Nonebatch_eval_metrics
: Falseeval_on_start
: Falseeval_use_gather_object
: Falsebatch_sampler
: batch_samplermulti_dataset_batch_sampler
: round_robin
Training Logs
Epoch | Step | cosine_map@100 |
---|---|---|
1.0 | 29 | 0.7800 |
1.7241 | 50 | 0.8242 |
2.0 | 58 | 0.8382 |
Framework Versions
- Python: 3.10.12
- Sentence Transformers: 3.1.1
- Transformers: 4.44.2
- PyTorch: 2.4.1+cu121
- Accelerate: 0.34.2
- Datasets: 2.19.2
- Tokenizers: 0.19.1
Citation
BibTeX
Sentence Transformers
@inproceedings{reimers-2019-sentence-bert,
title = "Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks",
author = "Reimers, Nils and Gurevych, Iryna",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
month = "11",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084",
}
MatryoshkaLoss
@misc{kusupati2024matryoshka,
title={Matryoshka Representation Learning},
author={Aditya Kusupati and Gantavya Bhatt and Aniket Rege and Matthew Wallingford and Aditya Sinha and Vivek Ramanujan and William Howard-Snyder and Kaifeng Chen and Sham Kakade and Prateek Jain and Ali Farhadi},
year={2024},
eprint={2205.13147},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.LG}
}
MultipleNegativesRankingLoss
@misc{henderson2017efficient,
title={Efficient Natural Language Response Suggestion for Smart Reply},
author={Matthew Henderson and Rami Al-Rfou and Brian Strope and Yun-hsuan Sung and Laszlo Lukacs and Ruiqi Guo and Sanjiv Kumar and Balint Miklos and Ray Kurzweil},
year={2017},
eprint={1705.00652},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CL}
}