Datasets:

staghado

/

ArXiv-tables

like 2

1308.4565v2

\begin{table}[t] \centering {\fontsize{8}{6}\selectfont \setlength{\tabcolsep}{.1em} \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline (Setting) Algorithm /$p_r$ & 1 & 0.5 & 0.1 & 0.01 \\ \hline (Z1,S2) CoS (context is time) error $\%$ & 10 & 13.9 & 36.4 & 47.1 \\ \hline (Z1,S2) DCZA (context is time) error $\%$ & 4.8 & 4.8 & 16.3 & 56.6 \\ \hline \end{tabular} } \caption{Error percentages of CoS and DCZA as a function of $p_r$ (probability of receiving the label at each time slot) when context is time.} \vspace{-0.2in} \label{tab:errorperc} \end{table}

1308.4565v2

\begin{table}[t] \centering {\fontsize{8}{6}\selectfont \setlength{\tabcolsep}{.1em} \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline $\#$ of learners & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 \\ \hline CoS error $\%$ & 49.8 & 49.7 & 50.2 & 22.3 \\ \hline DCZA error $\%$ & 49.8 & 49.8 & 49.8 & 22.7 \\ \hline \end{tabular} } \caption{Error percentages of CoS and DCZA for learner 1, as a function of the number of learners present in the system.} \vspace{-0.2in} \label{tab:nlearn} \end{table}

1308.4565v2

\begin{table}[t] \centering {\fontsize{8}{6}\selectfont \setlength{\tabcolsep}{.1em} \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline d & error $\%$ & training $\%$ & selection (except training/exploration) $\%$ \\ & & of learners 2,3,4 & of learners 1,2,3,4 \\ \hline 0 & 0.9 & 0.27, 0.23, 0.16 & 52.9, 47, 0.1, 0\\ \hline 0.5 & 1 & 0.27, 0.23, 0.16 & 53, 47, 0, 0 \\ \hline 0.7 & 23.7 &0.27, 0.23, 0.16 & 100, 0, 0, 0\\ \hline \end{tabular} } \caption{Error and arm selection percentages as a function of calling cost} \vspace{-0.25in} \label{tab:callcost} \end{table}

1308.4565v2

\begin{table}[t] \centering {\fontsize{8}{6}\selectfont \setlength{\tabcolsep}{.1em} \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|} \hline (Setting) Algorithm & previous label (A1) & srcbytes (A2) & time \\ & is context & is context & is context \\ \hline (Z1,S1) CoS error $\%$ & 2.68 & 3.64 & 6.43 \\ \hline (Z1,S2) CoS error $\%$ & 23.8 & 42.6 & 29 \\ \hline \end{tabular} } \caption{Error percentages of CoS for learner 1, when learner 1 only sends its context information to the other learners.} \vspace{-0.3in} \label{tab:onlycontext} \end{table}

1308.4565v2

\begin{table}[t] \centering {\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.6} {\fontsize{8}{7}\selectfont \setlength{\tabcolsep}{.1em} \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline & \cite{breiman1996bagging, buhlmann2003boosting, lazarevic2001distributed, chen2004channel, perlich2011cross} & \cite{mateos2010distributed, kargupta1999collective} & \cite{zheng2011attribute} & This work \\ \hline Aggregation & non-cooperative & cooperative & cooperative & \rev{no} \\ \hline Message & none & data & training & data and label \\ exchange & & & residual & only if improves \\ & & & & performance \\ \hline Learning & offline/online & offline & offline & Non-bayesian \\ approach&&&& online\\ \hline Correlation & N/A & no & no & yes\\ exploitation & & & &\\ \hline Information from & no & all & all & only if improves \\ other learners & & & & accuracy \\ \hline Data partition & horizontal & horizontal & vertical & horizontal \\ &&&& and vertical \\ \hline Bound on regret, & no &no &no &yes - sublinear\\ convergence rate &&&&\\ \hline \end{tabular} } } \caption{Comparison with related work in distributed data mining.} \label{tab:comparison1} \vspace{-0.2in} \end{table}

2306.12964v1

\begin{table}[!t] \centering \caption{Tokens used in our framework.} \resizebox{0.48\textwidth}{!}{ \begin{tabular}{c|c} \toprule[1.5pt] Category & Examples \\ \midrule[1pt] Operators & \emph{CS-Log}, \emph{CS-Add}, \emph{TS-Mean}, \emph, $\dotsc$ \\ Features & \emph{\$open}, \emph{\$volume}, $\dotsc$ \\ Constants & $-30, -10, -5, -2, -1, -0.5, -0.01, 0.01, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 30$ \\ Time Deltas & $10d, 20d, 30d, 40d, 50d$ \\ Sequence Indicator & \emph{BEG}(begin), \emph{SEP}(end of expression) \\ \bottomrule[1.5pt] \end{tabular}} \label{tab:tokens} \end{table}

2103.02037v2

\begin{table}[h!] \caption{Tight binding parameters for h-BN} \begin{center} \begin{tabular}{||p{2cm}|p{2cm}|p{2cm}|p{2cm}|p{2cm}||} \hline $t_b$ (eV)& $t_n$ (eV)& $t_1$ (eV)& $t_2$ (eV)& $t_3$ (eV)\\ \hline \hline 2.46 & -2.55 & 2.16 & 0.04 & 0.08\\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{center} \label{Table1} \end{table}

2103.02037v2

\begin{table}[h!] \caption{Hubbard model parameters for graphene} \begin{center} \begin{tabular}{||p{2cm}|p{2cm}|p{2cm}|p{2cm}|p{2cm}||} \hline $t_C$ (eV)& $t_1$ (eV)& $t_2$ (eV)& $t_3$ (eV) & $U$ (eV)\\ \hline \hline 1.994 & 2.86 & -0.236 & 0.252 & 9.3\\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{center} \label{Table2} \end{table}

2201.11358v2

\begin{table}[ht] \centering \caption{An illustrative example of one-hot and target encoding methods over the same data sample.}\label{tab:encoding} \begin{tabular}{c|c|c} \textbf{Ethnic} & \textbf{Encoding} & \textbf{Label} \\ \hline African-American & 1 & 1 \\ Caucasian & $1/3$ & 1\\ Caucasian & $1/3$ & 0\\ Caucasian & $1/3$ & 0 \\ Hispanic & 0 & 0 \end{tabular} \caption*{$(a)$ Unregularized Mean Target Encoding} \end{table}

2110.01227v1

\begin{table}[hbt] \caption{Query instances} \begin{center} \begin{tabular}{|c|l l|} \hline \textbf{Task} & \multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textbf{Query}}\\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{\textbf{\textit{Data retrieval}}}\\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{\#1} & Q1a & Retrieve documents written in \textit{French} \\ % \hline & Q1b & Retrieve documents written in \textit{English} and edited in \textit{December} \\ %\hline & Q1c & Retrieve documents whose domains are \textit{math} or \textit{info}, written in \textit{English} \\&& and edited in \textit{2010}, \textit{2012} or \textit{2014} \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{\#2} & Q2a & Retrieve data files (documents or tables) containing the term \textit{university} \\ & Q2b & Retrieve data files containing the terms \textit{university}, \textit{science} or \textit{research}\\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{\#3} & Q3a & Retrieve the top 5 documents similar to any given document \\ & Q3b & Retrieve 5 tables joinable to table $t\_dc9442ed0b52d69c\_\_\_\_c11\_1\_\_\_\_1$\\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{\textbf{\textit{ Textual Document Analysis/Aggregation}}}\\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{\#4} & Q4a & Calculate documents scores w.r.t. the terms \textit{university} and \textit{science} \\ & Q4b & Calculate documents scores w.r.t. the terms \textit{university}, \textit{research}, \\ & & \textit{new} and \textit{solution}\\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{\#5} & Q5a & Retrieve documents concordance w.r.t. the terms \textit{university} and \textit{science} \\ & Q5b & Retrieve documents concordance w.r.t. the terms \textit{university}, \textit{science} \\ & & \textit{new} and \textit{solution} \\ \hline \multirow{1}{*}{\#6} & Q6a & Find top 10 keywords from all documents (stopwords excluded) \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{\#7} & Q7a & Run a PCA with documents merged by \textit{domains} \\ & Q7b & Run a 3-cluster KMeans clustering with documents merged by \textit{domains} \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{\textbf{\textit{Tabular Data Analysis/Queries}}}\\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{\#8} & Q8a & Retrieve all tuples from table $t\_e9efd5cda78af711\_\_\_\_c11\_1\_\_\_\_1$ \\ & Q8b & Retrieve tuples from table $t\_e9efd5cda78af711\_\_\_\_c11\_1\_\_\_\_1$ \\ & & whose column \textit{PROVINCE} bears the value \textit{BC} \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{\#9} & Q9a & Calculate the average of columns \textit{Unnamed: 12}, \textit{13}, and \textit{20} \\ & & from table $t\_356fc1eaad97f93b\_\_\_\_c15\_1\_\_\_\_1$ grouped by \textit{Unnamed: 2} \\ & Q9b & Run a left join query between tables $PED\_SK\_DTL\_SNF\_\_\_\_c7\_0\_\_\_\_1$ \\ & & and $t\_285b3bcd52ec0c86\_\_\_\_c13\_1\_\_\_\_1$ w.r.t. columns named \textit{SOILTYPE} \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{\#10} & Q10a & Run a PCA on the result of query \textit{Q9a} \\ & Q10b & Run a 3-cluster KMeans clustering on the result of query \textit{Q9a} \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{center} \label{tab:query.instances} \end{table}

1211.6177v6

\begin{table} \centering \begin{tabular}{|m{0.12\textwidth}|m{0.2\textwidth}|m{0.11\textwidth}|m{0.2\textwidth}|m{0.2\textwidth}|} \hline \textbf{Identifier index}& \textbf{Identifier (name of annotation)}&\textbf{Number of regions} &\textbf{Hierarchical?}& \textbf{Number of annotated voxels}\\ \hline 1 & {\ttfamily{’standard’}} & 209 & Yes & 49,742\\ \hline 2 & {\ttfamily{’cortex’}} & 40 & Yes & 11,862\\ \hline 3 & {\ttfamily{’standard+cortex’}} & 242 & Yes & 49,742\\ \hline 4 & {\ttfamily{’fine’}} & 94 & No & 22,882\\ \hline 5 & {\ttfamily{’big12’}} & 13 & No & 25,155 \\ \hline 6 & {\ttfamily{’cortexLayers’}} & 8 & No & 11,862 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Systems of annotations of the adult mouse brain in the digital version of the Allen Reference Atlas, at a resolution of 200 microns.} \label{annotationSystems} \end{table}

1809.06404v3

\begin{table}[h] \caption{The evaluation of reward learning on transfer learning tasks. Mean scores (higher the better) with standard deviation are presented over 5 trials.} \centering \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|c|}\hline Algorithm& States-Only & Pointmass-Maze & Crippled-Ant\\ \hline \hline %&&&&\\\hline \multirow{1}{*}{Expert}& N/A & $-4.98 \pm 0.29$ & $432.66 \pm 14.38$ \\ \hline \multirow{1}{*}{AIRL}& Yes & $-8.07 \pm 0.50$&$175.51 \pm 27.31$ \\ \hline \multirow{1}{*}{AIRL}& No & $-19.28 \pm 2.03$&$46.12 \pm 14.37$ \\ \hline \multirow{1}{*}{\textbf{EAIRL(Ours)}}& \textbf{No} & $\boldsymbol{-7.01 \pm 0.61}$& $\boldsymbol{348.43 \pm 43.17}$\\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{table}

2009.04756v2

\begin{table}[h!] \caption{Fault classes and known magnitudes (i.e., $\theta$ for multiplicative sensor faults and leakage diameters) represented in training data. Data from the leakage $f_{iml}$ have been collected from two known diameters of the orifice.} \label{tab:fault_modes} \centering \begin{tabular}{ccccccccc} \hline Fault Class & \multicolumn{8}{c}{Fault magnitudes} \\ \hline $ NF $ & \\ $ f_{ypim} $ & -20\%& -15\% & -10\% & -5\% & 5\% & 10\% & 15\% & \\ $ f_{ypic} $ & -20\% & -15\% & -10\% & -5\% & 5\% & 10\% & 15\% &\\ $ f_{ywaf} $ & -20\% & -15\% & -10\% & -5\% & 5\% & 10\% & 15\% & 20\%\\ $ f_{iml} $ & 4mm & 6mm\\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{table}

2009.04756v2

\begin{table}[h!] \caption{Comparison of mean values of distinguishability measure of fault detection as a function of fault size and used batch size when estimating pdfs.} \label{tab:Dij_varying_batch} \centering \footnotesize \begin{tabular}{ c | c c c c } \multicolumn{5}{c}{$\mathcal{D}_{fypic,NF}$} \\ \hline $\theta$ \textbackslash $N$ & 50 & 100 & 200 & 300 \\ \hline -20\% & 37.7 & 45.9 & 69.5 & 77.1 \\ -15\% & 23.7 & 27.8 & 39.7 & 43.0 \\ -10\% & 13.4 & 14.8 & 18.6 & 19.1 \\ -5\% & 7.7 & 7.2 & 7.0 & 6.6 \\ 5\% & 9.1 & 7.1 & 7.0 & 7.3 \\ 10\%& 17.0 & 14.9 & 18.3 & 20.9 \\ 15\%& 31.0 & 28.8 & 40.0 & 45.6 \\ \hline \end{tabular}\quad\quad\quad% \begin{tabular}{ c | c c c c } \multicolumn{5}{c}{$\mathcal{D}_{fypim,NF}$} \\ \hline $\theta$ \textbackslash $N$ & 50 & 100 & 200 & 300 \\ \hline -20\% & 9.5 & 9.4 &10.1 & 10.7 \\ -15\% & 6.7 & 6.5 & 6.8 & 7.1 \\ -10\% & 5.1 & 4.6 & 4.2 & 4.2 \\ -5\% & 2.6 & 2.2 & 1.8 & 1.6\\ 5\% & 3.2 & 2.8 & 1.7 & 2.3 \\ 10\%& 4.7 & 4.2 & 3.9 & 3.8 \\ 15\%& 6.3 & 6.0 & 6.0 & 6.1 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \vspace{0.3cm} \begin{tabular}{ c | c c c c } \multicolumn{5}{c}{$\mathcal{D}_{fywaf,NF}$} \\ \hline $\theta$ \textbackslash $N$ & 50 & 100 & 200 & 300 \\ \hline -20\% & 3.9 & 3.3 & 3.0 & 2.9 \\ -15\% & 3.7 & 3.1 & 2.6 & 2.4 \\ -10\% & 3.1 & 2.7 & 2.1 & 1.9 \\ -5\% & 2.4 & 2.0 & 1.8 & 1.6 \\ 5\% & 1.8 & 1.4 & 1.1 & 0.8 \\ 10\%& 2.2 & 1.9 & 1.4 & 1.1 \\ 15\%& 2.6 & 2.1 & 1.6 & 1.4 \\ 20\%& 3.0 & 2.5 & 2.1 & 2.0 \\ \hline \end{tabular}\quad\quad\quad% \begin{tabular}{ c | c c c c } \multicolumn{5}{c}{$\mathcal{D}_{fiml,NF}$} \\ \hline $\theta$ \textbackslash $N$ & 50 & 100 & 200 & 300 \\ \hline 4mm& 4.0 & 3.6 & 3.0 & 2.6 \\ 6mm& 6.9 & 6.7 & 6.4 & 5.8 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{table}

2203.12808v4

\begin{table}[h] \centering \renewcommand\arraystretch{1.5} \resizebox{\linewidth}{!}{ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} % \hline % & Basis functions for $g(\cdot)$ function \\ \hline $\mathcal{V}_0$ & \makecell{$\{\texttt{exper,expersq,black,south,smsa,smsa66,} \texttt{reg1,reg2,reg3,reg4,reg5,reg6,reg7,reg8}\}$} \\ \hline $\mathcal{V}_1$ & \makecell{$\mathcal{V}_0\cup\texttt{nearc4}\cdot\{1, \texttt{exper}, \texttt{expersq}, \texttt{black},\texttt{south}, \texttt{smsa}, \texttt{smsa66}\}$} \\ \hline $\mathcal{V}_2$ & \makecell{$\mathcal{V}_0\cup\texttt{nearc4}\cdot\{1, \texttt{exper}, \texttt{expersq}, \texttt{black},\texttt{south}, \texttt{smsa}, \texttt{smsa66}, \texttt{reg1}, \texttt{reg2}, \texttt{reg3}, \texttt{reg4},\texttt{reg5}, \texttt{reg6}, \texttt{reg7}, \texttt{reg8}\}$} \\ \hline \end{tabular}} \caption{\small Definitions of $\mathcal{V}_0, \mathcal{V}_1$ and $\mathcal{V}_2$, which are used to approximate $g(\cdot)$.} %and required as inputs for Algorithm \ref{algo: TSCI selection}.} %$\mathcal{V}_0$ includes all baseline covariates; $\mathcal{V}_1$ includes $\mathcal{V}_0$ and the interaction of the IV \texttt{nearc4} and six most important covariates in the first stage. For $\mathcal{V}_2$, we further include the interactions of the IV with the remaining covariates which are the full set of regional dummies. } \label{tab:basis real data} \end{table}

1607.03765v1

\begin{table}[!h!] \tiny \centering \caption{List of descriptors. Point = real scalar; Int = interval data; Hist = histogram data} \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l} \cline{1-3} \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\textbf{Descriptor}} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\textbf{Nature}} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{\textbf{Legend}} & \\ \cline{1-3} Area & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Point} & Lesion area & \\ \cline{1-3} Perimeter & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Point} & Lesion perimeter & \\ \cline{1-3} EquivDiameter & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Point} & Equivalent diameter & \\ \cline{1-3} Eccentricity & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Point} & Eccentricity & \\ \cline{1-3} MinMaxAxisLength & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Int} & Major and minor interval axis & \\ \cline{1-3} AsymmXY & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Int} & Shape asymmetry & \\ \cline{1-3} AsymmCelebiA1 & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Point} & Alternative shape asymmetry & \\ \cline{1-3} AsymmCelebiA2 & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Point} & Alternative shape asymmetry & \\ \cline{1-3} AsymmXYRed & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Int} & Red asymmetry & \\ \cline{1-3} AsymmXYGreen & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Int} & Green asymmetry & \\ \cline{1-3} AsymmXYBlue & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Int} & Blue asymmetry & \\ \cline{1-3} MagloZoneExt & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Hist} & Pixel average intensity within external section & \\ \cline{1-3} MagloZoneMid & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Hist} & Pixel average intensity within middle section & \\ \cline{1-3} MagloZoneInt & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Hist} & Pixel average intensity within internal section & \\ \cline{1-3} Degradation1 & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Hist} & Color degradation & \\ \cline{1-3} Degradation2 & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Hist} & Alternative color degradation & \\ \cline{1-3} Degradation3 & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Hist} & Alternative color degradation & \\ \cline{1-3} Degradation4 & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Hist} & Alternative color degradation & \\ \cline{1-3} Degradation5 & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Hist} & Alternative color degradation & \\ \cline{1-3} Degradation6 & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Hist} & Alternative color degradation & \\ \cline{1-3} Compactness & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Point} & Compactness index & \\ \cline{1-3} MinMaxBorderDist & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Int} & Minimum and maximum distance border bari-center & \\ \cline{1-3} RappBorderDist & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Point} & Ratio between minimum and maximum distance border bari-center & \\ \cline{1-3} VectorDistNorm & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Hist} & Distances border bari-center & \\ \cline{1-3} CVBorderDist & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Point} & Coefficient of variation distance border bari-center & \\ \cline{1-3} IntBord1 & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Hist} & Border interruption & \\ \cline{1-3} IntBord2 & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Hist} & Alternative border interruption & \\ \cline{1-3} IntBord3 & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Hist} & Alternative border interruption & \\ \cline{1-3} IntBord4 & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Hist} & Alternative border interruption & \\ \cline{1-3} IntBord5 & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Hist} & Alternative border interruption & \\ \cline{1-3} IntBord6 & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Hist} & Alternative border interruption & \\ \cline{1-3} IntBord7 & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Hist} & Alternative border interruption & \\ \cline{1-3} Smoothness & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Point} & Smoothness index & \\ \cline{1-3} Solidity & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Point} & Solidity index & \\ \cline{1-3} \end{tabular} \label{descr} \end{table}

2111.08507v1

\begin{table}[h] \centering \begin{tabular}{| m{5cm} | m{3cm} | m{3cm} |} \hline \textbf{Data} & \textbf{Elbow Method} & \textbf{BIC} \\\hline RNASeq (5 points) & - & 15*\\\hline RPF (5 points) & - & - \\\hline TE (5 points) & 5 & 17* \\\hline \end{tabular} \caption{Optimal K for different datasets, K-Means} \label{tab:KMeanstable} \end{table}

2111.08507v1

\begin{table}[h] \centering \begin{tabular}{| m{5cm}| m{5cm} |} \hline \textbf{Data} & \textbf{BIC} \\\hline RNASeq (5 points) & 13*\\\hline RPF (5 points) & 8* \\\hline TE (5 points) & 16* \\\hline \end{tabular} \caption{Optimal K for different datasets, HMMs} \label{tab:HMMTable} \end{table}

2111.08507v1

\begin{table} \centering \begin{tabular}{|p{3cm}|p{3cm}|p{3cm}|p{3cm}|} \hline & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{\textbf{Accuracy for Clusters}} \\\hline \textbf{Algorithm} & \hspace{1.35cm}\textbf{4} & \hspace{1.35cm}\textbf{5} & \hspace{1.35cm}\textbf{6} \\\hline K-Means & \hspace{0.95cm}56.52\% & \hspace{0.95cm}48.35\% & \hspace{0.95cm}41.61\% \\\hline GMMs & \hspace{0.95cm}58.40\% & \hspace{0.95cm}53.11\% & \hspace{0.95cm}50.31\%\\\hline HMMs & \hspace{0.95cm}68.72\% & \hspace{0.95cm}79.45\% & \hspace{1.45cm}-\\\hline \end{tabular} \caption{Performance evaluation for all algorithms*} \label{tab:Comparison4} \end{table}

2111.08507v1

\begin{table}[h] \centering \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|} \hline \textbf{Covariance} & \textbf{Description} & \textbf{Parameters} \\ \hline Full & \pbox{20cm}{\hspace{0.1cm}\\Each component has its own \\ general covariance matrix\\} & \small $\frac{KD(D+1)}{2}$ \\ \hline Diagonal& \pbox{20cm}{\hspace{0.1cm}\\Each component has a\\ diagonal covariance matrix\\} & $KD$\\ \hline Spherical & \pbox{20cm}{\hspace{0.1cm}\\Each component \\ has a single variance\\} & $K$\\ \hline Tied & \pbox{20cm}{\hspace{0.1cm}\\All components share the\\ same general covariance matrix\\} & $\frac{D(D+1)}{2}$\\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Covariance Settings for GMM} \label{tab:GMM_Cov} \end{table}

2402.17219v1

\begin{table}[htb!] \caption{\textbf{The statistics on well-known Defi projects that have been attacked.}} \label{E} \centering \begin{tabular}{l|l|l} \hline \hline \makebox[0.15\textwidth][l]{\textbf{Project Name} } & \makebox[0.15\textwidth][l]{\textbf{Attacking Time}} & \makebox[0.1\textwidth][l]{\textbf{Loss}} \\ \hline Balancer & 2020.06.28 & \$0.5 Million \\ \hline MakerDAO & 2020.03.12 & \$9 Million \\ \hline ChainSwap & 2021.07.11 & \$4.8 Million \\ \hline Burgerswap & 2021.05.28 & \$7.2 Million \\ \hline bZx-V2 & 2020.09.15 & \$8.1 Million \\ \hline bZx-V1 & 2020.02.17 & \$9.4 Million \\ \hline Akropolis & 2020.11.12 & \$2 Million \\ \hline EasyFi & 2021.04.20 & \$80 Million \\ \hline Eminence Finance & 2020.09.29 & \$15 Million \\ \hline JulSwap & 2021.05.28 & \$0.7 Million \\ \hline Furucombo & 2020.09.29 & \$15 Million \\ \hline Harvest Finance & 2020.10.26 & \$33.8 Million \\ \hline Grim Finance & 2021.12.19 & \$30 Million \\ \hline Indexed Finance & 2021.10.14 & \$16 Million \\ \hline Lendf.Me & 2020.04.18 & \$25 Million \\ \hline Nerve & 2021.11.15 & \$8 Million \\ \hline Origin & 2020.11.17 & \$7 Million \\ \hline Oypn & 2020.08.04 & \$0.37 Million \\ \hline PancakeBunny & 2021.05.20 & \$47.1 Million \\ \hline PAID Network & 2021.03.05 & \$160 Million \\ \hline Pickle Finance & 2020.11.22 & \$20 Million \\ \hline Poly Network & 2021.08.10 & \$611 Million \\ \hline Popsicle & 2021.08.04 & \$25 Million \\ \hline Rari Capital & 2022.04.30 & \$90 Million \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} \end{table}

2105.14564v1

\begin{table} \normalsize \begin{center} \caption{The top 5 features selected from ISCX VPN-NonVPN and NIMS Datasets}\label{tab3} \begin{tabular}{|| c | l | c | l ||} \hline \textbf{ID} & \multicolumn{1}{||c|}{\textbf{ISCX}} & \textbf{ID} & \multicolumn{1}{c||}{\textbf{NIMS}}\\ \hline\hline 0 & duration & 16 & duration\\ 5 & max-fiat & 10 & max-fiat\\ 6 & max-biat & 14 & max-biat\\ 7 & mean-fiat & 9 & mean-fiat\\ 8 & mean-biat & 13 & mean-biat\\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{center} \end{table}

1908.06402v1

\begin{table}[!bt] \caption{Description of features.} \begin{center} \begin{tabular}{|p{2.3cm}|p{5.7cm}|} %\begin{tabular}{|cp{3cm}|cp{9cm}|} \hline \textbf{Feature name} & \textbf{Description} \\\hline $>$1000 h exp & Player has more than 1000 hours of experience. \\\hline Gender & Gender of a player. 0 is a woman, 1 is a man. \\\hline Kill Death Ratio & Number of player's kills divided by number of player's death in a session \\\hline Age & Age of a player. \\\hline lean\_back & Portion of time when player leans to the back of the chair. \\\hline med\_acc\_x\_std & Median value of the floating standard deviation within 1-second window for $x$-component of accelerometer. The same for $y$ and $z$ components and gyro. \\\hline moving\_acc\_x & Proportion of time when floating standard deviation of $x$ component of accelerometer is 3 times more than median. In other words, player actively moves along $x$ axis. \\\hline moving\_gyro\_x & The same as moving\_acc\_x, but player actively rotates along $x$-axis. \\\hline moving\_death\_acc\_x & Proportion of time during 1 second after death when person actively moving. The same for gyro, other components and events.\\\hline \end{tabular} \label{factors_description} \end{center} \end{table}

1908.06402v1

\begin{table}[!bt] \caption{Features selected using AIC.} \begin{center} \begin{tabular}{|p{2.9cm}|p{0.7cm}|p{4cm}|} \hline \textbf{Feature name} & \textbf{Coef.} & \textbf{Possible sense}\\\hline moving\_death\_gyro\_x & -0.17 & How often after the death player quickly leans back (or opposite, get close to a monitor).\\\hline moving\_shootout\_gyro\_z & -0.16 & How often during the shootout player spins on the chair.\\\hline moving\_death\_gyro\_y & -0.07 & After the death player changes a posture.\\\hline moving\_shootout\_acc\_y & -0.07 & How often during the shootout player approaches or move away from monitor.\\\hline med\_gyro\_y\_std & 0.03 & How intensely player moves in a chair.\\\hline moving\_acc\_x & 0.05 & How often player moves along the table.\\\hline moving\_acc\_y & 0.11 & How often player approaches or move away from a monitor.\\\hline med\_gyro\_x\_std & 0.42 & How intensely player wiggles to a monitor.\\\hline \end{tabular} \label{aic_features} \end{center} \end{table}

1908.06402v1

\begin{table}[!bt] \caption{Scores for the machine learning algorithms.} \begin{center} \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline & Accuracy & ROC AUC & Log Loss \\\hline Logistic regression & 0.71 & 0.86 & 0.60 \\\hline SVM & \textbf{0.78} & 0.85 & 0.84 \\\hline Random forest & 0.77 & \textbf{0.88} & \textbf{0.46} \\\hline k-nearest neighbors & 0.77 & 0.73 & 5.59 \\\hline Naive Bayes & 0.76 & 0.69 & 5.50 \\\hline Gaussian process & 0.71 & 0.86 & 0.60 \\\hline \end{tabular} \label{scores} \end{center} \end{table}

1703.07608v5

\begin{table}[htpb] \centering \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline {\bf exploration method} & {\bf expected episodes to learn} \\ \hline optimal & $\Theta(N)$ \\ pure exploitation & $\infty$ \\ myopic & $\infty$ \\ dithering & $\Theta(2^N)$ \\ % curiosity-driven & $\Theta(N^2)$ \\ optimistic & $\Theta(N)$ \\ randomized & $\Theta(N)$ \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Expected number of episodes required to learn an optimal policy for Example \ref{ex:grid}.} \label{tab:grid} \end{table}

2312.05346v1

\begin{table}[H] \centering \caption{Feature Columns Description (Bored Ape Yacht Club)} \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Feature Category} & \textbf{Feature} & \textbf{Description} \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{Market} & volume\_eth\_lag1 & daily market volume (ETH) \\ \cline{2-3} & price\_p5\_eth\_lag1 & daily 5-percentile price (ETH) \\ \cline{2-3} & price\_max\_eth\_lag1 & daily highest price (ETH) \\ \cline{2-3} & price\_min\_eth\_lag1 & daily minimum (floor) price (ETH)\\ \hline \multirow{8}{*}{Traits \& Rarity} & rarity\_rank & rarity rank measured by OpenRarity \\ \cline{2-3} & Background\_count & number of items with the same \textit{Background} trait \\ \cline{2-3} & Mouth\_count & number of items with the same \textit{Mouth} trait \\ \cline{2-3} & Eyes\_count & number of items with the same \textit{Eyes} trait\\ \cline{2-3} & Fur\_count & number of items with the same \textit{Fur} trait \\ \cline{2-3} & Clothes\_count & number of items with the same \textit{Clothes} trait \\ \cline{2-3} & Earring\_count & number of items with the same \textit{Earring} trait \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{Last Trade} & last\_trade\_timediff & time since the last time this item was traded \\ \cline{2-3} & last\_trade\_price & price at the last time this item was traded\\ \hline \end{tabular} \label{tab: feature_columns} \end{table}

2312.05346v1

\begin{table}[H] \centering \caption{List of Hyperparameters and Importance with Respect to Validation Loss.} \begin{tabular}{l|c|c} \hline \textbf{Config Parameter} & \textbf{Importance} & \textbf{Correlation} \\ \hline kernel size & .427 & -.102 \\ learning rate & .356 & .055 \\ filters & .100 & .008 \\ units & .087 & -.091 \\ dropout & .030 & -.098 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \label{tab:cnn_hyperparam} \end{table}

2002.10853v1

\begin{table}[!htbp] \begin{subtable}[h]{0.45\textwidth} \centering \begin{tabular}{|l|l|} \hline States: & Reward: \\ \hline Object Front & -1 \\ \hline Object Left & -1 \\ \hline Object Right & -1 \\ \hline Object Back Left & -1 \\ \hline Object Back Right & -1 \\ \hline Object Back Left \& Back Right & -1 \\ \hline Nothing Detected & 1 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{States \& Rewards} \label{task_1_SR} \end{subtable} \hfill \begin{subtable}[h]{0.45\textwidth} \centering \begin{tabular}{|l|} \hline Actions: \\ \hline Forwards \\ \hline Up Left \\ \hline Up Right \\ \hline Back Left \\ \hline Back Right \\ \hline Backwards \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Actions} \label{task_1_A} \end{subtable} \caption{States, Rewards and Actions of Task 1} \end{table}

2002.10853v1

\begin{table}[!htbp] \begin{subtable}[b]{0.45\textwidth} \centering \begin{tabular}{|l|l|} \hline States: & Reward: \\ \hline Target Far Left & 5 \\ \hline Target Far Center & 5 \\ \hline Target Far Right & 5 \\ \hline Target Close Left & 10 \\ \hline Target Close Center & 10 \\ \hline Target Close Right & 10 \\ \hline Object Front & -10 \\ \hline Object Left & -10 \\ \hline Object Right & -10 \\ \hline Nothing Detected but last seen Left & -1 \\ \hline Nothing Detected but last seen Right & -1 \\ \hline Nothing Detected & -5 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{States \& Rewards} \label{task_2_SR} \end{subtable} \hfill \begin{subtable}[b]{0.45\textwidth} \centering \begin{tabular}{|l|} \hline Actions: \\ \hline Forwards \\ \hline Up Left \\ \hline Up Right \\ \hline Back Left \\ \hline Back Right \\ \hline Backwards \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Actions} \label{task_2_A} \end{subtable} \caption{States, Rewards and Actions of Task 2} \end{table}

2002.10853v1

\begin{table}[!htbp] \begin{subtable}[b]{0.45\textwidth} \centering \begin{tabular}{|l|l|} \hline States: & Reward: \\ \hline Target Far Left & 5 \\ \hline Target Far Center & 5 \\ \hline Target Far Right & 5 \\ \hline Target Close Left & 10 \\ \hline Target Close Center & 20 \\ \hline Target Close Right & 10 \\ \hline Object Front & -10 \\ \hline Object Left & -10 \\ \hline Object Right & -10 \\ \hline Nothing Detected but last seen Left & -10 \\ \hline Nothing Detected but last seen Right & -10 \\ \hline Nothing Detected & -10 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{States \& Rewards} \label{task_3_SR} \end{subtable} \hfill \begin{subtable}[b]{0.45\textwidth} \centering \begin{tabular}{|l|} \hline Actions: \\ \hline Forwards \\ \hline Up Left \\ \hline Up Right \\ \hline Backwards \\ \hline Turn Around Axis (Clockwise) \\ or Forwards (50\% chance) \\ \hline Turn Around Axis (Counter-Clockwise) \\ or Forwards (50\% chance) \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Actions} \label{task_3_A} \end{subtable} \caption{States, Rewards and Actions of Task 3} \end{table}

1903.07854v1

\begin{table} \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{-2pt} \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{-5pt} \caption{ Performance of policies trained with different algorithms} \label{table7} \begin{center} \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.1mm}{ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline \multirow{2}{*}{Method} & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{Reaching task} & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{Grasping object task} \\ \cline{2-5} & success rate & distance error $(m)$ & success rate & distance error $(m)$\\ \hline GAIL-demo & $0.98\pm0.02$ &${0.03\pm0.01 }$ &$0.95\pm0.02$ &${0.02\pm0.003 }$ \\ \hline GASIL & $0.42\pm0.08$ &${0.20\pm0.07}$ & $0.03\pm0.03$ &${0.25\pm0.06}$\\ \hline PP0 & $0$ &${1.70\pm0.12}$ & $0$ &${1.53\pm0.08}$ \\ \hline HGAIL(ours) & $0.98\pm0.02$ &${1.05\pm0.03}$ & $0.95\pm0.03$ &${0.03\pm0.002}$\\ \hline HGAIL-no & $0.01\pm0.01$ &${0.62\pm0.27}$ & $0.02\pm0.02$ &${1.49\pm0.04}$\\ \hline \end{tabular}} \end{center} \end{table}

1903.07854v1

\begin{table}[h] %\caption{ Comparing policies performance with different training methods} %\label{table1} %\begin{center} %\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|} %\hline %Method & Success rates & Distance errors ($m$) \\ %\hline %GAIL-demos\cite{c9} & $0.98\pm0.02$ &${0.03\pm0.004 }$ \\ %\hline %GASIL\cite{c43} & $0.62\pm0.07$ &${0.16\pm0.07}$ \\ %\hline %PP0\cite{c44} & $ 0.38\pm0.14$ &${0.18\pm0.12}$ \\ %\hline %HGAIL(ours) & $0.98\pm0.02$ &${0.03\pm0.01}$ \\ %\hline %HGAIL-no & $0.26\pm0.05$ &${0.62\pm0.27}$ \\ % %\hline %\end{tabular} %\end{center} %\end{table}

1903.07854v1

\begin{table}[h] \caption{ Performance of policies trained with curriculum learning mechanism or not} \label{table2} \begin{center} \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|} \hline Method & Success rates & Distance errors ($m$) \\ \hline Curriculum learning & $0.98\pm0.02$ &${0.03\pm0.01}$ \\ \hline No curriculum learning & $0.49\pm0.17$ &${0.16\pm0.05}$ \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{center} \end{table}

1903.07854v1

\begin{table}[h] \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{0pt} \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{0pt} \caption{ Performance of policies trained with different hindsight transformation} \label{table3} \begin{center} \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|} \hline Hindsight transformation & Success rates & Distance errors ($m$) \\ \hline Future & $0.99\pm 0.01$ &${0.04\pm 0.01}$ \\ \hline Final & $0.31\pm 0.17$ &${0.18\pm 0.05}$ \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{center} \end{table}

1012.0269v1

\begin{table} \centering \begin{tabular}{| l |p{8cm}|} \hline \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\R function} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Description}\\ \hline \code{f.analyzeFMRI.gui()} & Starts an \R/TclTk based GUI to explore, using the \pkg{AnalyzeFMRI} package functions, an fMRI data set stored in ANALYZE format. \tabularnewline \hline \code{f.icast.fmri.gui()} & The GUI provides a quick and easy to use interface for applying spatial or temporal ICA to fMRI data sets in NIFTI format.\tabularnewline \hline \code{f.plot.volume.gui()} & TclTk GUI to display functional or structural MR images. This GUI is useful for instance to display the results performed with \code{f.icast.fmri.gui()}.\tabularnewline \hline \code{f.read.header(file)} & Reads ANALYZE or NIFTI (\texttt{.hdr} or \texttt{.nii}) header file. The format type is automatically detected by first reading the magic field. \tabularnewline \hline \code{f.read.volume(file)} & Reads ANALYZE or NIFTI image file and puts it into an array. Automatic detection of the format type. \tabularnewline \hline \code{f.write.analyze(mat,file,...,)} & Stores the data in ANALYZE format: creation of the corresponding \texttt{.img/.hdr} pair of files. \tabularnewline \hline \code{f.write.nifti(mat,file,size,...)} & Stores the data in NIFTI format: creation of the corresponding \texttt{.img/.hdr} pair of files or single \texttt{.nii} file. \tabularnewline \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Seven main functions of our package with their description.\label{table1}} \end{table}

1709.03854v1

\begin{table} \begin{tabularx}{\columnwidth}{ | l | >{\raggedright\arraybackslash} X | >{\raggedright\arraybackslash} X | } \hline \textbf{Short name} & \textbf{Name} & \textbf{Parameter settings} \\ \hline ctree & Conditional trees & min\_split=20, min\_bucket=7\\ \hline rtree & Regression trees & min\_split=20, min\_bucket=7\\ \hline cforest & Random forest (with conditional trees) & n\_trees=500, min\_split=20, min\_bucket=7\\ \hline rforest & Random forest & n\_trees=500, min\_split=20, min\_bucket=7\\ \hline gbm & Generalized boosted regression & n\_trees=100, depth=1, CV=no, min\_obs\_node=10\\ \hline fnn & k-Nearest neighbor & k=1\\ \hline earth & Adaptive regression splines (earth) & (as default)\\ \hline glmnet & Regularized GLM & (as default)\\ \hline ridge & Penalized ridge regression & (as default)\\ \hline lm & Multiple linear regression & (as default)\\ \hline pcr & Principal component regression & (as default)\\ \hline plsr & Partial least squares & (as default)\\ \hline rsm & Response surface regression & (as default)\\ \hline rvm & Relevance vector machine & Kernel=RBF, nu=0.2, epsilon=0.1\\ \hline ksvm & Support vector machines & Kernel=RBF, nu=0.2, epsilon=0.1\\ \hline ksvmfp & Support vector machines with Tanimoto kernel & Kernel=Tanimoto\\ \hline nnet & Neural networks & size=3\\ \hline nneth2o & Neural networks using H2O library & layers=2, size layer 1 = 0.333* n\_inputs, layer 2 = 0.667*n\_inputs\\ \hline \end{tabularx} \caption{List of baseline QSAR algorithms. Abbreviations: n\_trees: number of trees; min\_split: minimum node size allowed for splitting; min\_bucket: minimum size of the bucket. k: number of neighbours; depth: search depth; CV: cross-validation; min\_obs\_node: minimum number of observations per node; RBF: radial basis function with nu (spread) and epsilon (scale) parameters; size: number of neurons in the hidden layer; n\_inputs: length of the input vector.} \label{table:baseline-qsar-algos} \end{table}

1709.03854v1

\begin{table}[t] \begin{tabularx}{\columnwidth}{ | >{\raggedright\arraybackslash} X | >{\raggedright\arraybackslash} X | >{\raggedright\arraybackslash} X | >{\raggedright\arraybackslash} X |} \hline & Basic set of descriptors (43) & All descriptors (1447) & FCFP4 fingerprint (1024) \\ \hline Original dataset & basicmolprop (not used) & allmolprop (not used) & fpFCFP4 \\ \hline Missing value imputation & basicmolprop.miss & allmolprop.miss & (no missing values) \\ \hline \end{tabularx} \caption{Names of the generated dataset representations. } \label{table:Dataset Representations} \end{table}

1709.03854v1

\begin{table} \begin{tabularx}{\columnwidth}{ | l | >{\raggedright\arraybackslash} X | } \hline Feature & Description \\ \hline multiinfo & Multiple information (also called total correlation) among the random variables in the dataset. \\ \hline mutualinfo & Mutual information between nominal attributes X and Y. Describes the reduction in uncertainty of Y due to the knowledge of X, and leans on the conditional entropy $H(Y|X)$.\\ \hline nentropyfeat & Normalised entropy of the features which is the class entropy divided by log(n) where n is the number of the features.\\ \hline mmeanfeat & Average mean of the features.\\ \hline msdfeat & Average standard deviation of the features.\\ \hline kurtresp & Kurtosis of the response variable.\\ \hline meanresp & Mean of the response variable.\\ \hline skewresp & Skewness of the response variable.\\ \hline nentropyresp & Normalised entropy of the response variable.\\ \hline sdresp & Standard deviation of the response.\\ \hline aggFCFP4fp (1024 features) & Aggregated fingerprints and normalized over the number of instances in the dataset.\\ \hline \end{tabularx} \caption{Dataset meta-features (Examples).} \label{table:dataset-meta-features} \end{table}

1709.03854v1

\begin{table}[h] \centering \begin{tabularx}{\columnwidth}{ | l | >{\raggedright\arraybackslash} X | } \hline Feature & Description \\ \hline Aliphatic index & The Aliphatic index~\cite{IKAI1980} is defined as the relative volume occupied by aliphatic side chains (Alanine, Valine, Isoleucine, and Leucine). It may be regarded as a positive factor for the increase of thermo stability of globular proteins.\\ \hline Hydrophobicity & Hydrophobicity is the association of non-polar groups or molecules in an aqueous environment which arises from the tendency of water to exclude non-polar molecules \cite{IUPAC}.\\ \hline Boman index & This the potential protein interaction index proposed by Boman~\cite{boman2003}. It is calculated as the sum of the solubility values for all residues in a sequence~\cite{peptides}. \\ \hline Hydrophobicity (38 features) & Hydrophobicity is the association of non-polar groups or molecules in an aqueous environment which arises from the tendency of water to exclude non-polar molecules \cite{IUPAC}. We estimated 38 variants of hydrophobicity.\\ \hline Net charge & The theoretical net charge of a protein sequence as described by Moore~\cite{moore1985}.\\ \hline Molecular weight & Ratio of the mass of a molecule to the unified atomic mass unit. Sometimes called the molecular weight or relative molar mass \cite{IUPAC}.\\ \hline Isoelectric point & The pH value at which the net electric charge of an elementary entity is zero. (pI is a commonly used symbol for this kind-of-quantity, however more accurate symbol is pH(I)) \cite{IUPAC}. \\ \hline Sequence length & A number of amino acids in a protein sequence. \\ \hline Instability index & The instability index was proposed by (Guruprasad, 1990). A protein whose instability index is smaller than 40 is predicted as stable, a value above 40 predicts that the protein may be unstable.\\ \hline DC groups (400 features) & The Dipeptide Composition descriptor~\cite{protr2015,bhasin2004} captures information about the fraction and local order of amino acids.\\ \hline \end{tabularx} \caption{Drug targets meta-features (Examples).} \label{table:drug-target-meta-features} \end{table}

1806.07846v1

\begin{table} \caption{\label{tbl:cifar10} Accuracy results for CIFAR-10 Dataset with different network sizes.} \centering \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline Number of Conv Channels & fp32 & int8 KANJI \\ \hline (16, 16, 32) & 77.3\% & 78.5\% \\ \hline (32, 32, 64) & 80.8\% & 81.9\% \\ \hline (48, 48, 96) & 83.1\% & 83.0\% \\ \hline (64, 64, 128) & 84.2\% & 83.7\% \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{table}

1806.07846v1

\begin{table} \caption{\label{tbl:other} Accuracy results with VGG for CIFAR-100 and tiny-imagenet dataset.} \centering \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|} \hline Data set & fp32 & int8 KANJI \\ \hline CIFAR-100 top1 & 59.5\% & 59.6\% \\ \hline CIFAR-100 top3 & 77.9\% & 77.4\% \\ \hline tiny-imagenet top1 & 42.0\% & 42.0\% \\ \hline tiny-imagenet top3 & 60.0\% & 60.1\% \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{table}

1806.07846v1

\begin{table} \caption{\label{tbl:norm} Different image pre-processing operators.} \centering \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline Image Pre-Processing Operator & Input Dependence & Memory Overhead & Runtime Overhead \\ \hline $per\_image\_standardization$ & Yes & Low & High \\ \hline $mean.binaryproto$ & No & High & Low \\ \hline $batch\_norm$-like & No & Low & Low \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{table}

1806.07846v1

\begin{table} \caption{\label{tbl:quant} Network accuracy on CIFAR-10 with different image pre-processing and quantization.} \centering \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|} \hline Input Pre-Processing & Quantization & Accuracy \\ \hline $per\_image\_standardization$ & None (fp32) & 81.2\% \\ \hline $per\_image\_standardization$ & 8-bit asymmetric & 81.2\% \\ \hline $mean.binaryproto$ & None (fp32) & 81.5\% \\ \hline $mean.binaryproto$ & 8-bit, symmetric & 81.5\% \\ \hline $batch\_norm$-like & None (fp32) & 81.8\% \\ \hline $batch\_norm$-like & KANJI & 81.9\% \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{table}

2304.00129v1

\begin{table}[ht!] \vspace{-1.0em} \center \footnotesize \setlength\tabcolsep{1.0pt} \begin{tabular}{ |c|c|c| } \hline \textbf{Symbol} & \textbf{Definition} & \textbf{Default} \\ \toprule \hline $s$, $p$, $w$ & \# DPs, \# power and eigen iterations & 6, 10, 5 \\ \hline $\psi$ + $\alpha$ = $\rho$ & \# PCs + oversampling = \# components & 4 + 4 = 8 \\ \hline $\zeta*$, $\zeta$, $d$ & Optimized cost, cost, approx. degree & -, -, 31 \\ \hline $m, n, n_i$ & \# features, \# samples tot. \& at DP$_i$ & $2^8$, 6144, $2^{10}$ \\ \hline $\mathcal{N}$, $\lambda$ & Ring dim., \# available levels & $2^{14}$, 7 \\ \hline $R_Q$ & Plain/Ciphertext domain & - \\ \hline %$\Delta$, $mc$ & Plaintext scale, chain of moduli & -\\ \hline $\bm{c}$ & encrypted vector/ fresh ciphertext with & -\\ & $\bm{c}=(\bm{c}_{0}, \bm{c}_{1}) \in R^{2}_{Q_{L}}$ %$= \{\bm{c}, L, \Delta \}$ & \\ \hline $\bm{\tilde{p}}\in R_{Q_{L}}$, $sk,\ pk$ & plaintext, secret \& public keys & -, -, -\\ \hline $t$, $\bullet$ & $\bm{c}$ capacity, dot product & $2^{13}$, -\\ \hline $\bm{M}^{(a \times b)}$, $\bm{\tilde{N}}^{(b \times c)}$ & Generic encrypted and cleartext matrices & -, - \\ \hline $\bm{M}[i,j]$, $\bm{v}[i]$ & Matrix/vector elem. at index $(i,j)$/$i$) & -, - \\ \hline \end{tabular} \vspace{-0.5em} \caption{\small{\textbf{Glossary of Symbols and Their Default Values in \sys.}}} \label{tab:symbols} \vspace{-0.5em} \end{table}

2307.11788v3

\begin{table}[h] \centering \begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c|c|c} & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{Class} & & \\ \hline Complexity & $-$ & $\circ$ & $+$ & $\diameter$ word count & vocabulary size \\ \Xhline{2\arrayrulewidth} Low & 34\% & 18\% & 48\% & 4.9 & 913 \\ \hline Moderate & 37\% & 17\% & 46\% & 18.4 & 1608 \end{tabular} \caption{Data class distribution of both generated datasets encompassing roughly 1000 sentences each.} \label{tab:DataDistribution} \end{table}

2205.15104v1

\begin{table} \centering \caption{Patient demographics of final study cohort.}\label{table_demographics_1} \vspace{-2mm} \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|l|} \hline Demographics & Total & Death & Survival\\ \hline \hline Patients & 19414 & 1892 & 17522\\ {\bfseries Gender} & & &\\ Female & 8582 & 879 & 7703\\ Male & 10832 & 1013 & 9819\\ {\bfseries Ethnicity} & & &\\ Caucasian & 13706 & 6021 & 7685\\ African American & 1447 & 801 & 646\\ Asian & 445 & 174 & 271\\ Hispanic/Latino & 604 & 249 & 355\\ Others/Unknown & 3212 & 1337 & 1875\\ \hline \end{tabular} \vspace{-2mm} \end{table}

2205.15104v1

\begin{table} \centering \caption{Admission age and length of stay of final study cohort.}\label{table_demographics_2} \vspace{-2mm} \begin{tabular}{|l|ccc|ccc|} \hline & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{\textbf{Admission age (years)}} & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{\textbf{Length of 1st ICU stay (days)}}\\ \hline & Total & Death & Survival & Total & Death & Survival\\ \hline \hline Count & 19414 & 1892 & 17522 & 19414 & 1892 & 17522 \\ Mean & 64.83 & 68.56 & 64.42 & 6.82 & 9.46 & 6.53 \\ Std & 17.09 & 16.15 & 17.14 & 7.50 & 8.90 & 7.28 \\ Min & 15.19 & 16.47 & 15.19 & 2.00 & 2.01 & 2.00 \\ Max & 90.00 & 90.00 & 90.00 & 153.93 & 97.30 & 153.93 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \vspace{-2mm} \end{table}

2404.07452v1

\begin{table}[h] \centering \caption{Performance results on our proposed framework RiskLabs from different baseline models.} \scalebox{1.0}{ \begin{tabular}{lccccc|c|c} \toprule \textbf{Model} & \textbf{$\overline{MSE}$} & \textbf{$MSE_3$} & \textbf{$MSE_7$} & \textbf{$MSE_{15}$} & \textbf{$MSE_{30}$} & \textbf{$VaR$} & \text{Multi-Task}\\ \midrule Classical Method & 0.713 &1.710 & 0.526 & 0.330 & 0.284 & / & $\otimes$ \\ LSTM & 0.746 &1.970 & 0.459 & 0.320 & 0.235 & / & $\otimes$ \\ MT-LSTM-ATT & 0.739 &1.983 & 0.435 & 0.304 & 0.233 & / & $\otimes$ \\ HAN & 0.598 &1.426 & 0.461 & 0.308 & 0.198 & / & $\otimes$ \\ MRDM & 0.577 &1.371 & 0.420 & 0.300 & 0.217 & / & $\otimes$ \\ HTML & 0.401 &0.845 & 0.349 & 0.251 & \textbf{0.158} & / &$\checkmark$ \\ GPT-3.5-Turbo & 2.198 & 2.152 & 1.793 & 2.514 & 2.332 & 0.371 & $\checkmark$ \\ \midrule \textbf{RiskLabs} & \textbf{0.324} & \textbf{0.585} & \textbf{0.317} & \textbf{0.233} & 0.171 & \textbf{0.049} & $\checkmark$ \\ \bottomrule \end{tabular}} \label{tab:overall_performance} \end{table}

2404.07452v1

\begin{table}[h] \centering \caption{Ablation Study: performance results of different modules.} \scalebox{1.0}{ \begin{tabular}{lccccc|c} \toprule \textbf{Module} & \textbf{$\overline{MSE}$} & \textbf{$MSE_3$} & \textbf{$MSE_7$} & \textbf{$MSE_{15}$} & \textbf{$MSE_{30}$} & \textbf{$VaR$} \\ \midrule Audio + Text & 0.373 & 0.645 & 0.362 & 0.280 & 0.204 & 0.131 \\ Audio + Text + Analysis & 0.357 & 0.627 & 0.335 & 0.267 & 0.199 & 0.057 \\ Audio + Text + Analysis + VIX & \textbf{0.324} & \textbf{0.585} & \textbf{0.317} & \textbf{0.233} & \textbf{0.171} & \textbf{0.049} \\ \bottomrule \end{tabular}} \label{tab:ablation} \end{table}

2107.13132v2

\begin{table}[] \centering \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline & n. epochs & s. epochs & frontier size & penalty & max depth & lr & batch size \\ \hline Synthetic & 10 & 10 & 30 & 0.01 & 2 & 0.0002 & 32 \\ \hline CalMS21 & 6 & 10 & 8 & 0.01 & 5 & 0.001 & 256 \\ \hline Basketball & 8 & 8 & 30 & 0.01 & 3 & 0.002 & 128 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Hyperparameters for program learning. n. epochs and s. epochs represent the number of neural and symbolic epochs respectively, where the neural epoch is for the neural heuristic. lr is the learning rate.} \label{tab:hyperparams_prog} \end{table}

2107.13132v2

\begin{table}[] \centering \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline & epochs & z dim & h dim & RNN dim & adv. dim & disc. cap. & cont. cap. & lr \\ \hline Synthetic & 50 & 4 & 16 & 16 & 8 & 0.6 & - & 0.0002 \\ \hline CalMS21 & 30 & 8 & 256 & 256 & 8 & 0.69 & 10 & 0.0001 \\ \hline Basketball & 20 & 8 & 128 & 128 & 8 & 0.6 & 4 & 0.02 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Hyperparameters for VAE training. The batch size is the same as the ones for program learning in Table~\ref{tab:hyperparams_prog}.} \label{tab:hyperparams_vae} \end{table}

2406.03603v1

\begin{table}[ht] \centering \caption{Ablation study on positive and negative calibration in \Cref{eq:muc_obj} regarding the average gap over metrics on CIFAR-10 and MoCo with forgetting ratio 10/50\%. For example, ``w/o + w/'' means \emph{AC} without negative calibration but with positive calibration. } \label{tab:ablation} \vspace{5pt} \begin{tabular}{c|cccc} \toprule \textbf{Ratio} & \textbf{w/ + w/} & \textbf{w/o + w/} & \textbf{w/ + w/o} & \textbf{w/o + w/o} \\ \hline 10\% & \textbf{0.92} & 1.25 & 1.95 & 2.70 \\ 50\% & \textbf{2.00} & 4.12 & 3.75 & 6.45 \\ \bottomrule \end{tabular}% \end{table}

2310.06221v1

\begin{table}[htb] \caption{List of common math notations. } \centering \begin{tabular}{|c||l|} \hline % \textbf{Symbols} & \textbf{Descriptions} \\ \midrule \hline $[n]$ & the set $\{1, ..., n\} $ \\ \hline $\|\cdot\|_1$ & $l_1$ norm of a matrix or a vector \\ \hline $\|\cdot\|_2$ & $l_2$ norm of a matrix or a vector \\ \hline $\|\cdot\|_F$ & the Frobenius norm of a matrix \\ \hline $\mathbf{1}_n$ & $n$-dimensional vector with all 1 \\ \hline $\mathbf{0}_n$ & $n$-dimensional vector with all 0 \\ \hline $\mathbf{1}_{m\times n}$ & $m$-by-$n$ matrix with all 1 \\ \hline $\mathbf{0}_{m\times n}$ & $m$-by-$n$ matrix with all 0 \\ \hline $I_n$ & identity matrix with shape $n\times n$ \\ \hline $V_{(i,j)}/V_{ij}$ & the value at $i$-th row and $j$-th column of a matrix $V$ \\ \hline $V_{k, (i,j)}$ & the value at $i$-th row and $j$-th column of a matrix $V_k$ \\ \hline $\*v_{(i)}/\*v_{i}$ & $i$-th value for a vector $\*v$ \\ \hline $\*v_{k, (i)}$ & $i$-th value for a subscripted vector $\*v_{k}$ \\ \hline $\langle \*u, \*v \rangle$ & inner-production between $\*u$ and $\*v$ \\ \hline $V^{\dagger}$ & Moore-Penrose inverse of matrix $V$ \\ \hline % & \\ \hline % $A$ & Adjacency Matrix \\ \hline % \rule{0pt}{2pt}$\Dot{A}$ & Normalized Adjacency Matrix \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{table}

2011.10097v1

\begin{table} \centering \caption{Model parameters} \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|} \hline & PNMM&SLMM \\ \hline $\eta$ & 0.500& 0.500 \\ \hline $\beta$ & 0.100& 0.100 \\ \hline $\lambda$ & 0.500& 0.500 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \label{table5:par_pnmm} \end{table}

1410.3169v1

\begin{table}[!h] \caption{$+$ vs. X} \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline Features& Bins&Sens.&Spec.& Max Errors \\ \hline PLH &No& 99.00\% &98.63\% &1.37\%\\ \hline MLPCA& No& 87.90\%& 95.67\%& 12.10\% \\ \hline MLSA& No& 99.37\%& 99.30\% &0.70\%\\ \hline PLH &10 & 89.13\% & 94.67\% &10.87\% \\ \hline MLPCA& 10 & 84.23\% &93.60\% &15.77\%\\ \hline MLSA &10& 98.23\% &98.63\% &1.77\%\\ \hline \end{tabular} \label{table:plusXtable} \end{table}

1410.3169v1

\begin{table}[!h] \caption{$+$ vs. Y} \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline Features& Bins&Sens.&Spec.& Max Errors \\ \hline PLH &No& 89.23\% &92.93\% &10.77\%\\ \hline MLPCA& No& 87.83\% & 94.23\% & 12.17\% \\ \hline MLSA& No& 93.90\% & 97.50\% & 6.10\%\\ \hline PLH &10 & 85.87\% & 97.23\% & 14.13\% \\ \hline MLPCA& 10 & 82.27\% & 91.33\% & 17.73\%\\ \hline MLSA &10& 93.93\% & 98.87\% & 6.07\%\\ \hline \end{tabular} \label{table:plusYtable} \end{table}

1410.3169v1

\begin{table}[!h] \caption{$+$ vs. Triple} \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline Features& Bins&Sens.&Spec.& Max Errors \\ \hline PLH &No& 99.73\% & 99.43\% & 0.57\%\\ \hline MLPCA& No& 86.67\% & 96.80\% & 13.33\% \\ \hline MLSA& No & 99.83\% & 99.93\% & 0.17\% \\ \hline PLH &10 & 99.97\% & 99.77\% & 0.23\% \\ \hline MLPCA& 10 & 86.43\% & 95.27\% & 13.57\%\\ \hline MLSA &10& 99.97\% & 99.97\% & 0.03\% \\ \hline \end{tabular} \label{table:plustripletable} \end{table}

1410.3169v1

\begin{table}[!h] \caption{X vs. Y} \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline Features& Bins&Sens.&Spec.& Max Errors \\ \hline PLH &No& 95.20\% & 98.93\% & 4.80\%\\ \hline MLPCA& No& 79.17\% & 93.77\% & 20.83\% \\ \hline MLSA& No& 99.97\% & 100.00\% & 0.03\% \\ \hline PLH &10 & 94.67\% & 97.77\% & 5.33\% \\ \hline MLPCA& 10 & 81.50\% & 94.80\% & 18.50\%\\ \hline MLSA &10& 99.97\% & 99.97\% & 0.03\% \\ \hline \end{tabular} \label{table:XYtable} \end{table}

1410.3169v1

\begin{table}[!h] \caption{X vs. Triple} \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline Features& Bins&Sens.&Spec.& Max Errors \\ \hline PLH &No& 89.13\% & 92.03\% & 10.87\%\\ \hline MLPCA& No& 90.00\% & 92.53\% & 10.00\% \\ \hline MLSA& No& 94.20\% & 98.30\% & 5.80\% \\ \hline PLH &10 & 89.50\% & 93.90\% & 10.50\% \\ \hline MLPCA& 10 & 92.60\% & 93.30\% & 7.40\% \\ \hline MLSA &10& 95.00\% & 98.73\% & 5.00\%\\ \hline \end{tabular} \label{table:Xtripletable} \end{table}

1410.3169v1

\begin{table}[!h] \caption{Y vs. Triple} \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline Features& Bins&Sens.&Spec.& Max Errors \\ \hline PLH &No& 98.17\% & 100.00\% & 1.83\%\\ \hline MLPCA& No& 92.70\% & 91.37\% & 8.63\% \\ \hline MLSA& No& 99.23\% & 100.00\% & 0.77\%\\ \hline PLH &10 & 97.47\% & 100.00\% & 2.53\% \\ \hline MLPCA& 10 & 95.77\% & 87.57\% & 12.43\%\\ \hline MLSA &10& 99.13\% & 100.00\% & 0.87\%\\ \hline \end{tabular} \label{table:Ytripletable} \end{table}

1410.3169v1

\begin{table}[!h] \caption{One Side vs. Both Sides} \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline Features& Bins&Sens.&Spec.& Max Errors \\ \hline PLH &No& 92.17\%& 99.73\%& 7.83\%\\ \hline MLPCA& No& 66.17\%& 86.03\%& 33.83\% \\ \hline MLSA& No& 95.93\%& 98.73\% &4.07\%\\ \hline PLH &10 & 91.67\%& 99.73\%& 8.33\% \\ \hline MLPCA& 10 & 68.60\%& 83.97\%& 31.40\%\\ \hline MLSA &10& 95.13\%& 98.73\%& 4.87\%\\ \hline \end{tabular} \label{table:sidestable} \end{table}

1410.3169v1

\begin{table}[!h] \caption{LIDAR} \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline Features& Bins&Sens.&Spec.& Max Errors \\ \hline PLH &No& 92.80\% & 74.04\% & 25.96\%\\ \hline MLPCA& No& 94.28\% & 98.86\% & 5.72\% \\ \hline MLSA& No& 94.90\% & 98.56\% & 5.10\% \\ \hline PLH &10 & 92.98\% & 78.04\% & 21.96\% \\ \hline MLPCA& 10 & 95.05\% & 99.06\% & 4.95\%\\ \hline MLSA &10& 95.69\% & 99.14\% & 4.31\% \\ \hline \end{tabular} \label{table:LIDARtable} \end{table}

2404.12355v2

\begin{table}[t!] \centering \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline Equation type & Generator \\\hline Heat&\multirow{5}{*}{Method of Line}\\ Klein-Gordon&\\ Sine-Gordon&\\ Porous medium &\\ Cahn-Hilliard&\\\hline Diff-React&\multirow{3}{*}{PDEBench \cite{takamoto2022pdebench}}\\ Viscous Conservation&\\ Inviscid Conservation&\\\hline Advection&\multirow{2}{*}{Exact solution defined by IC}\\ Wave&\\\hline Kdv&Fourier Spectral Method \cite{Kdvsolver}\\\hline Fokker-Planck&Matrix Numerical Method \cite{fplancksolver}\\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Solvers for different types of equations} \label{tab:Generator} \end{table}

2404.12355v2

\begin{table}[t] \centering \caption{\textbf{Optimizer hyperparameters.}} \label{tab:optim_hyper} \begin{tabular}{l l | l l } \toprule Learning rate & $10^{-4}$ & Weight decay & $10^{-4}$\\ Scheduler & Inverse square root & Warmup steps & 10\% of total steps\\ Batch size per GPU & 512 & Gradient norm clip & 1.0\\ Data loss weight $\alpha$ & 5.0 & Symbol loss weight $\beta$ & 1.0\\ \bottomrule \end{tabular} \end{table}

2109.00984v2

\begin{table}[h] \setlength{\tabcolsep}{4pt} \rowcolors{2}{gray!25}{white} \resizebox{\linewidth}{!}{ \begin{tabular}{lcl} \toprule \bf Function & \bf Function name(s) & \bf Description\\ \midrule Absolute & \texttt{abs} & Multiply value by its sign.\\ Addition & \texttt{add}, \texttt{+} & Each party adds their shares.\\ Argument of maximum & \texttt{argmax} & Perform pairwise comparisons or tree reduction.\\ Argument of minimum & \texttt{argmin} & Perform pairwise comparisons or tree reduction.\\ Average pooling & \texttt{avg\_pool2d} & Each party computes the average pooling of its share.\\ Batch normalization & \texttt{batchnorm} & Batch normalize values using summation, division, and variance functions.\\ Binary AND & \texttt{and}, \texttt{\&} & Compute using binary Beaver protocol.\\ Binary cross-entropy & \texttt{binary\_cross\_entropy} & Compute using logarithm, multiplication, and addition functions.\\ Binary XOR & \texttt{xor}, \texttt{\^} & Each party XORs it shares.\\ Clone & \texttt{clone} & Each party clones their share.\\ Comparison & \texttt{>=}, \texttt{<=}, \texttt{=}, \texttt{ge}, \texttt{le}, \texttt{eq} & To compare to $0$, convert to binary secret share and inspect most significant bit.\\ Concatenation & \texttt{cat} & Each party concatenates their shares.\\ \multirow{-2}{*}{Convolution} & \multirow{-2}{*}{\texttt{conv1d}, \texttt{conv2d}} & \shortstack[l]{If filter is public, each party convolves its share.\\If filter is private, compute using Beaver protocol.}\\ Cosine & \texttt{cos} & Approximate using repeated-squaring method.\\ Cross-entropy & \texttt{cross\_entropy} & Compute using softmax, logarithm, multiplication, and division functions.\\ Cumulative sum & \texttt{cumsum} & Each party computes cumulative sum of values in its share.\\ Division & \texttt{div}, \texttt{/} & If divisor is public, divide shares by value and correct for wrap-around errors.\\ Dot product & \texttt{dot} & Multiply all elements and sum results.\\ \multirow{-2}{*}{Dropout} & \multirow{-2}{*}{\texttt{dropout}} & \shortstack[l]{Each party multiplies their share with dropout mask.\\Dropout mask is not encrypted.}\\ Error function & \texttt{erf} & Approximate using Maclaurin series.\\ Exponent & \texttt{exp} & Approximate using limit approximation.\\ Flatten & \texttt{flatten} & Each party flattens their share.\\ Flip & \texttt{flip} & Each party flips their share.\\ Hard tangent & \texttt{hardtanh} & Compute using comparison, multiplication, and addition functions.\\ Logarithm & \texttt{log} & Approximate using higher-order modified Householder method.\\ Log-softmax & \texttt{log\_softmax} & Compute using exponentiation, maximum, summation, and addition functions.\\ \multirow{-2}{*}{Matrix multiplication} & \multirow{-2}{*}{\texttt{matmul}} & \shortstack[l]{If one matrix is public, each party matrix-multiplies its share.\\If both matrices are private, compute using Beaver protocol.}\\ Maximum & \texttt{max} & Compute argmax as one-hot vector; compute dot product with input.\\ Max pooling & \texttt{max\_pool2d} & Compute maximum value.\\ Mean & \texttt{mean} & Each party computes mean of its share.\\ Minimum & \texttt{min} & Compute argmin as one-hot vector; compute dot product with input.\\ \multirow{-2}{*}{Multiplication} & \multirow{-2}{*}{\texttt{mul}, \texttt{*}} & \shortstack[l]{If multiplier is public, each party multiplies its share with the\\multiplier. If multiplier is private, use Beaver protocol.}\\ Multiplexing & \texttt{where} & Multiply first value by binary mask; add second value multiplied by inverse mask.\\ Negation & \texttt{neg} & Each party negates their share.\\ Norm & \texttt{norm} & Compute using the square, sum, and square root functions.\\ Outer product & \texttt{ger} & Perform multiplication of each pair of elements.\\ Padding & \texttt{pad} &Each party pads their share.\\ Permute & \texttt{permute} & Each party permutes their share. Indexes are not encrypted.\\ Product & \texttt{prod} & Multiply all elements in the input.\\ \multirow{-2}{*}{Power} & \multirow{-2}{*}{\texttt{pow}, \texttt{pos\_pow}} & \shortstack[l]{For positive powers, multiply in log-domain and exponentiate.\\For negative powers, compute reciprocal and evaluate positive power.}\\ Reciprocal & \texttt{reciprocal} & Approximate using Newton-Rhapson iterations.\\ ReLU & \texttt{relu}, \texttt{relu6} & Compare values with $0$, and multiply values by the resulting mask.\\ Reshaping & \texttt{reshape}, \texttt{view} & Each party reshapes their share.\\ Rolling & \texttt{roll} & Each party rolls their share.\\ \multirow{-2}{*}{Scattering} & \multirow{-2}{*}{\texttt{scatter}} & \shortstack[l]{Each party scatters one share into the other share.\\Indexes are not encrypted.}\\ \multirow{-3}{*}{Selection} & \shortstack{\texttt{gather},\\ \texttt{index\_select},\\ \texttt{narrow}, \texttt{take}} & \multirow{-3}{*}{Each party selects part of their share. Indexes are not encrypted.}\\ Sigmoid & \texttt{sigmoid} & Compute using the exponential and reciprocal functions.\\ Sign & \texttt{sign} & Compare value with $0$, multiply by $2$, and subtract $1$.\\ Sine & \texttt{sin} & Approximate using repeated-squaring method.\\ Softmax & \texttt{softmax} & Compute using exponentiation, maximum, summation, and reciprocal functions.\\ Square & \texttt{square} & Compute using Beaver protocol.\\ Square root & \texttt{sqrt} & Approximate using Newton-Rhapson iterations.\\ Squeezing & \texttt{squeeze} & Each party removes dimensions with size $1$ from their share.\\ Stacking & \texttt{stack} & Each party stacks their shares.\\ Subtraction & \texttt{sub}, \texttt{-} & Each party subtracts their shares.\\ Summation & \texttt{sum} & Each party sums all values in its share.\\ Tangent & \texttt{tanh} & Perform linear transformation of sigmoid value of output.\\ Trace & \texttt{trace} & Each party sums all diagonal elements of their share.\\ Transpose & \texttt{t}, \texttt{transpose} & Each party transposes their share.\\ Unsqueezing & \texttt{unsqueeze} & Each party adds dimensions with size $1$ to their share.\\ Variance & \texttt{var} & Compute using square, addition, and subtraction functions.\\ \bottomrule \end{tabular} } \caption{Overview of all functions on tensors implemented in \crypten{}.} \label{tab:functions_detail} \end{table}

2303.06183v2

\begin{table}[H] \begin{center} \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline Event & Type & $\phi^e(t, I)$ & New individual \\ \hline Birth & $b$ & $\delta_{(t, \infty, X)}$ & $ \tau^b =t, \; X \sim k^b(t,I,\d x)$\\ \hline Entry & $en$& $\delta_{(\tau^b, \infty, X)}$ & $(\tau^b, X) \sim k^{en}(t,\d s, \d x)$ \\ \hline Death/Exit & $d$ & $\delta_{(\tau^b, t,x)} - \delta_{(\tau^b, \infty, x)}$ & {$\tau^d = t$} \\ \hline Swap & $s$ & $\delta_{(\tau^b, \infty , X)} - \delta_{(\tau^b, \infty, x)}$ & $ X \sim k^s(t,I,\d x)$\\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{center} \caption{Events action} \label{TableEvAction} \end{table}

2102.09340v1

\begin{table}[!t] \caption{The preprocessing Reuters-21578 dataset} \label{table_6} \centering \begin{tabular}{|m{40pt}<{\centering}|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline Tasks& \multicolumn{2}{c|}{people vs. places}& \multicolumn{2}{c|}{orgs vs. people}& \multicolumn{2}{c|}{orgs vs. places}\\ \hline Feature dimension& \multicolumn{2}{c|}{4562}& \multicolumn{2}{c|}{4771} &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{4415}\\ \hline \hline Source vs. Target& people& places& orgs& people& orgs& places\\ \hline Number of samples& 1077& 1077& 1237& 1208& 1016& 1043\\ \hline Number of positive samples& 428 &456& 588 &587& 428& 456\\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{table}

2102.09340v1

\begin{table} \scriptsize \caption{The text classification accuracy (\%) with different kernel functions} \label{table_8} \centering \begin{tabular}{| m{18pt}<{\centering} | m{18pt}<{\centering} | m{18pt}<{\centering} | m{21pt}<{\centering} | m{18pt}<{\centering} | m{20pt}<{\centering} | m{21pt}<{\centering} | m{18pt}<{\centering} |} \hline Dim& IGLDA (poly) &IGLDA (rbf) &IGLDA (Cauchy)& IGLDA (exp) & SDLK-IGLDA (rbf) &SDLK-IGLDA (Cauchy) & SDLK-IGLDA (exp)\\ \hline \hline 5& 55.8979& 51.7047 &51.5692& 51.4485& 56.3695& \textbf{57.3630}& 56.3045\\ 10& 60.9694 &51.5339& 52.5998& 46.2117& 61.5135& \textbf{63.4169}& 61.5970\\ 20& 59.3110 &52.0204& 52.9155 &47.5859& 59.5173& \textbf{60.4550}& 58.4215\\ 30& 57.1365 &51.8217& 53.2126& 45.7753& 57.5859& \textbf{58.3565} &56.6202\\ \hline Average& 58.3287& 51.7702& 52.5743& 47.7554& 58.7466& \textbf{59.8979}& 58.2358 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{table}

2107.01238v1

\begin{table} \small \centering \begin{tabular}{|c|l|c|c|c|c} \hline \textbf{Week} & \textbf{Topic} & \textbf{Exp. Acc. ORQ} & \textbf{Acc. ORQ} & \textbf{Acc. MCQ} \\ \hline \hline 1 & Basics & 1.00 & 1.00 & 1.00\\ 2 & Perceptrons & 0.98 & 0.98 & 0.98\\ 3 & Features & 0.86 & 0.86 & 0.89\\ 4 & Logistic regression & 0.86 & 0.86 & 0.90\\ 5 & Regression & 0.97 & 0.97 & 0.97\\ 6 & Neural networks I & 1.00 & 1.00 & 1.00\\ 7 & Neural networks II & 0.97 & 0.97 & 0.98\\ 8 & Convolutional neural networks & 0.84 & 0.86 & 0.89\\ 9 & Recurrent neural networks & 1.00 & 1.00 & 1.00\\ 10 & State machines and MDPs & 0.94 & 1.00 & 1.00\\ 11 & Reinforcement learning & 1.00 & 1.00 & 1.00\\ 12 & Decision trees & 1.00 & 1.00 & 1.00\\ \hline & Overall average over topics & 0.95 & 0.96 & 0.97\\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Accuracy achieved using our system for each topic taught in MIT's Introduction to Machine Learning course, 6.036. Our system demonstrates an overall average expression accuracy (percent of correct expressions) of 95\% and value accuracy (percent of correct values) of 96\% for open response questions (ORQ), and accuracy (percent of correct values) of 97\% for multiple-choice questions (MCQ), achieving grade A performance in real-time.} \label{tab:results} \vspace{-20pt} \end{table}

2107.01238v1

\begin{table} \small \centering \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Topic} & \textbf{Question} & \textbf{Answer} \\ \hline \hline Basics & Compute the magnitude of $[10, 10, 1]$. & $14.18$ \\ \hline Perceptrons & If the decision boundary of a classifier is $\theta$, where $\theta =$ & $4$ \\ & $(4, 1)$, how does it classify point $p$, where $p = (2, -4)$? & \\ \hline Features & A point $1$ has label $1$. Compute the margin of a classifier & $2$ \\ & on this point. Let the $\theta$ of the classifier be $-1$ and the $\theta_0$ & \\ & of the classifier be $-1$. & \\ \hline Logistic & If we have $x = (0, -1)$, $\theta = (1, -2)$, and $\theta_0 = -3$, then & $-1$ \\ Regression & what is the result of $\theta x + \theta_0$? & \\ \hline Regression & If we let $\theta = 1$ and $\lambda = 0.5$, what is the mean squared error & $2.25$ \\ & of the given points $[(2, 0), (1, 1)]$? & \\ \hline Neural & Neurons A and B take inputs $4$ and $2$ with weights $2$ and & $20.5$\\ Networks I & $1$, respectively. Neuron A has offset $0.5$ and neuron B has & \\ & offset $1$. Neuron C takes in the output of A and B with & \\ & weights $1$ and $3$, respectively, and with offset $3$. What is & \\ & the output? & \\ \hline Neural & Compute the ReLU output of neuron C which takes the & $1.5$ \\ Networks II & output of neuron A with weight $1$ and neuron B & \\ & with weight $2$ and offset $1$. Neuron B has input $0$ and & \\ & offset $1$. Neuron A has input $-1$ and offset $2$ with offset & \\ & $0.5$. & \\ \hline Convolutional & What is the minimum number of padding needed to & $8$ \\ Neural & maintain the same output size if the input image is $50$ & \\ Networks & by $50$ and the filter is $17$ by $17$? & \\ \hline State Machines & Consider the input $x_t = [7, 14, 13, 10]$ to a state machine & $56$\\ and Markov & with equations $s_t = f(s_{t-1}, x_t)$ and $y_t = g(s_t)$. Compute $y_4$ & \\ Decision & if our initial conditions are $s_0 = 2$, $f(s_{t-1}, x_t) =$ & \\ Processes & $\max(s_{t-1}, x_t)$, and $g(s_t) = 4s_t$. & \\ \hline Reinforcement & Let $q = 2$. After Q learning, what is $q$ if $a = 0.3$ and $t = 8$? & $3.8$ \\ Learning & & \\ \hline Recurrent & Let $s_0 = 1.5$, $w = 1.5$, and $x = [1, 0, 2]$. Compute $s_3$ if $s_t =$ & $9.31$\\ Neural & $w*s_{t-1} + x_t$. & \\ Networks & & \\ \hline Decision & Consider a 1D classification line on a 2D plane. There is a & $0.90$ \\ Trees & total of $46$ points, $30$ of which are on the right and the & \\ & rest on the left of the boundary. $5$ points on the left are & \\ & classified positive. What is the entropy of the left region? & \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{A sample question from each of the machine learning course topics and the answer generated by our model.} \label{results:examples} \vspace{-24pt} \end{table}

2107.01238v1

\begin{table}[h!] \small \centering \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Topic} & \textbf{Question} & \textbf{Multiple Choice Options} & \textbf{Output} \\ \hline \hline Regression & Let $1$ be the optimal $\theta$ by mean & $[-0.24, -2.24, -0.64, -53.9]$ & $[-0.24]$ \\ & squared error. Given the data & & \\ & points $[(0, 0), (1, -1), (2, y)]$ and & & \\ & $\lambda = 1$, compute the value of $y$. & & \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Multiple-choice question and answers. An example of the questions given to the model, the answers generated by the adversarial generator, and the output answers made by the model in order of the appearance. Note that the final value in output is the correct answer of the question, and the answering stops once the models achieves the correct answer. The correct answer is selected in the first attempt.} \label{tab:input-output-examples_mc} \end{table}

2107.01238v1

\begin{table} \centering \small \begin{tabular}{|c|l|} \hline Question & A neural network has input $x_1$ with weight $w_1$ that goes into neuron $A$.\\ & Neuron $A$ also has input $\textit{OA}$ that has weight $w_{\textit{OA}}$. Neuron $C$ inputs\\ & the output of neuron $A$ with weight $w_{\textit{AC}}$. Neuron $C$ also has input $\textit{OC}$\\ & that has weight $w_{\textit{OC}}$. Neurons output the sum of the products of each\\ & input with their respective weight. at has weight $w_{\textit{OA}}$. Neuron $C$ inputs\\ & the output of neuron $A$ with weight $w_{\textit{AC}}$. Neuron $C$ also has input $\textit{OC}$\\ & that has weigh $w_{\textit{OC}}$. Neurons output the sum of the products\\ & of each input with their respective weight. What is the output of\\ & neuron $C$ if $x_{1} = 2$, $w_{1} = 1$, $\textit{OA} = 0.5$, $w_{\textit{OA}} = 2$, $w_{\textit{AC}} = 1$, $\textit{OC} = 1$,\\ & and $w_{\textit{OC}} = 3$?\\ \hline Answer & $(\textit{OA}*w_{\textit{OA}})*w_{\textit{AC}} + \textit{OC}*w_{\textit{OC}} = (0.5 * 2) * 1 + 1 * 3 = 4$\\ \hline Expression & 1. $(\textit{OA}*w_{\textit{OA}})$\\ Hints & 2. $(\textit{OA}*w_{\textit{OA}})*w_{\textit{AC}}$\\ & 3. $\textit{OC}*w_{\textit{OC}}$\\ \hline Value & 1. $0.5 * 2 = 1$\\ Hints & 2. $(0.5 * 2) * 1 = 1$\\ & 3. $1 * 3 = 3$\\ \hline Example & For an example where $\textit{OA} = 8, w_{\textit{OA}} = 9, w_{\textit{AC}} = 3, \textit{OC} = 2, w_{\textit{OC}} = 4$:\\ Hints & 1. $8 * 9 = 72$\\ & 2. $(8 * 9) * 3 = 216$\\ & 3. $2 * 4 = 8$\\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Example questions and hints generated by our model.} \label{tab:results_perceptrons} \end{table}

2107.01238v1

\begin{table} \small \centering \begin{tabular}{|c|l|c|c|c|} \hline \textbf{Week} & \textbf{Topic} & \textbf{Our Model} & \textbf{Our Model without GNN} & \textbf{GPT-3} \\ \hline \hline 1 & Basics & 1.00 & 0.50 & 0.00\\ 2 & Perceptrons & 1.00 & 0.95 & 0.20\\ 3 & Features & 0.65 & 0.50 & 0.00\\ 4 & Logistic regression & 0.70 & 0.50 & 0.20\\ 5 & Regression & 1.00 & 0.75 & 0.10\\ 6 & Neural networks I & 1.00 & 0.95 & 0.00\\ 7 & Neural networks II & 1.00 & 0.90 & 0.00\\ 8 & Convolutional neural networks & 0.90 & 0.95 & 0.00\\ 9 & Recurrent neural networks & 1.00 & 1.00 & 0.20\\ 10 & State machines and MDPs & 1.00 & 1.00 & 0.10\\ 11 & Reinforcement learning & 1.00 & 1.00 & 0.00\\ 12 & Decision trees & 1.00 & 0.90 & 0.00\\ \hline & Overall average over topics & 0.94 & 0.83 & 0.07\\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{A comparison of the ORQ performance of our model vs. our model without GNN vs. GPT-3.} \label{tab:baseline} \vspace{-20pt} \end{table}

2107.01238v1

\begin{table}[!htb] \centering \small \begin{tabular}{|l|c|} \hline \textbf{Basic Questions} & \textbf{Answer} \\ \hline \hline 1. Compute the magnitude of $[3, 12]$. & $12.37$ \\ \hline 2. If $x = [16, 4, 9]$, what is $||x||$? & $18.79$ \\ \hline 3. Find the Euclidean length of $[7, 0, 1]$ . & $7.07$ \\ \hline 4. Compute the magnitude of $[10, 10, 1]$. & $14.18$ \\ \hline 5. What is the magnitude of the vector $[0, 7]$? & $7$ \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Example basic questions and answers generated by our model.} \label{tab:results_basics1} \end{table}

2107.01238v1

\begin{table} \centering \small \begin{tabular}{|l|c|} \hline \textbf{Perceptrons Questions} & \textbf{Answer} \\ \hline \hline 1. If the decision boundary of a classifier is $\theta$, where $\theta = (4, 1)$, how & $4$ \\ does it classify point $p$, where $p = (2, -4)$? & \\ \hline 2. How does a classifier with decision boundary $\theta$ classify a point $p$ if & $-16$ \\ $\theta = (2, 4)$ and $p = (0, -4)$? & \\ \hline 3. What is the most number of mistakes made by the perceptron algorithm & $2704$ \\ if $13$ is the maximum magnitude of a point in the dataset and the dataset & \\ has a margin of $4$ to the separator. & \\ \hline 4. Determine if the following two classifiers represent the same hyperplane, & $1$ \\ $[0, 1, 1]$ and $[0, 1, 1]$. If so, return $1$, and return anything else otherwise. & \\ \hline 5. A classifier has a decision boundary where $\theta = (1, 0)$. What value does & $3$ \\ it classify $p$, where $p = (3, 0)$? & \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Example perceptrons questions and answers generated by our model.} \label{tab:results_perceptrons1} \end{table}

2107.01238v1

\begin{table} \centering \small \begin{tabular}{|l|c|} \hline \textbf{Features Questions} & \textbf{Answer} \\ \hline \hline 1. What is the margin of a classifier with $\theta = -1$ and $\theta_0 = -6$ on a & $-6$ \\ point $0$ with label $1$? & \\ \hline 2. What is the loss for the data point $(0, -1)$ if we use NLL. Let $\theta = 2$ & $-0.69$ \\ and $\theta_0 = 0$. Also use natural log where the base is $2.71828$. & \\ \hline 3. A point $1$ has label $1$. Compute the margin of a classifier on this & $2$ \\ point. Let the $\theta$ of the classifier be $-1$ and the $\theta_0$ of the classifier be $-1$. & \\ \hline 4. Given the values for $\theta = 2$ and $\theta_0 = 1$, compute the NLL loss on the & $-0.31$ \\ data point $(-1, 0)$. Use log base $e$ of $2.71828$ for the log. & \\ \hline 5. What does the sigmoid function return when you pass into it $1$? Hint: & $0.73$ \\ have $e = 2.71828$. & \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Example feature questions and answers generated by our model.} \label{tab:results_features} \end{table}

2107.01238v1

\begin{table} \centering \small \begin{tabular}{|l|c|} \hline \textbf{Logistic Regression Questions} & \textbf{Answer} \\ \hline \hline 1. What is the result of $\theta x + \theta_0$ if $x = (-1, 0)$, $\theta = (0, -1)$, and $\theta_0 = 3$? & $3$ \\ \hline 2. Let $\theta = (1, -1)$, $\theta_0 = 2$, and $x = (-1, 0)$. Compute $\theta x + \theta_0$. & $1$ \\ \hline 3. If you let $\theta = 1$ and $\eta = 0.05$, what is the updated $\theta$ value after one & $1$ \\ gradient descent step if the loss function is given by $( 0 \times \theta + 3)^2$ ? & \\ \hline 4. If we have $x = (0, -1)$, $\theta = (1, -2)$, and $\theta_0 = -3$, then what is the & $-1$ \\ result of $\theta x + \theta_0$? & \\ \hline 5. What is the value of $\theta x + \theta_0$ if $x = (-1, 0)$, $\theta = (-1, 0)$, and $\theta_0 = -3$? & $-2$ \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Example logistic regression questions and answers generated by our model.} \label{tab:results_logistic_regression} \end{table}

2107.01238v1

\begin{table} \centering \small \begin{tabular}{|l|c|} \hline \textbf{Regression Questions} & \textbf{Answer} \\ \hline \hline 1. If $f(\theta) = (3 \times \theta + 3)^{2}$ and $\theta = 4$ what is $f(\theta)$? & $225$\\ \hline 2. Given $\theta = 3$ and $\lambda = 1$, compute the mean squared error with the data & $19.5$ \\ points $[(2, 0), (2, 5)]$. & \\ \hline 3. With $\lambda = 1$, the optimal $\theta = 1$. If the data points are $[(0, 1), (1, 2),$ & $0.27$ \\ $(2, y)]$, what is the value of $y$? The optimal $\theta$ is computed by mean & \\ squared error. & \\ \hline 4. If we let $\theta = 1$ and $\lambda = 0.5$, what is the mean squared error of the given & $2.25$ \\ points $[(2, 0), (1, 1)]$? & \\ \hline 5. If $f(\theta)$ is $(7 \times \theta + 8)^2$, what is $f(\theta)$ when $\theta = 15.4$? & $13409.64$ \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Example regression questions and answers generated by our model.} \label{tab:results_regression} \end{table}

2107.01238v1

\begin{table} \centering \small \begin{tabular}{|l|c|} \hline \textbf{Neural Networks II Questions} & \textbf{Answer} \\ \hline \hline 1. A ReLU is applied to the output of neuron C, which takes in outputs & $15.5$ \\ from neurons A with weight $wAC = 1$ and B with weight $wBC = 2$ and & \\ offset $oC = 1$. Neuron A takes in value $x1 = 4$ with weight $w1 = 1$ and & \\ offset value $oA = 0.5$. Neuron B takes in input $x2 = 4$ with an offset of $1$. & \\ \hline 2. A neural network has inputs $x1 = 4$ with weight $2$ and $x2 = 2$ with & $16.5$ \\ weight $1$ and offset value $oA = 0.5$. Neuron B inputs $x2$ with offset $1$. & \\ Neuron C takes in the output of neurons A and B with offsets $wAC = 1$ & \\ and $wBC = 2$, respectively. Neuron C has offset value $oC = 2$ and & \\ applies a ReLU on its output. Compute the output. & \\ \hline 3. Neuron C is the output neuron which applies a ReLU on its output and & $6$ \\ neuron A is the input neuron to a neural network. Compute the output of a & \\ neural network with the given architecture and inputs. Neuron C takes in & \\ the offset value $oC = 2$ with weight $wOC = 3$. Neuron C takes in the output& \\ of neuron A with weight $wAC = 1$. Neuron A takes in the input value & \\ $x1 = 0$with weight $w1 = 2$ and offset value $oA = 0.5$ and offset weight & \\ $wOC = 3$. & \\ \hline 4. Neurons A and B take inputs $2$ and $1$ with weights $2$ and $1$, respectively. & $10.5$ \\ Neuron A has offset $0.5$ and neuron B has offset $1$ . Neuron C takes in the & \\ output of A and B with weights $1$ and $2$, respectively, and with offset 2. & \\ Neuron C also applies a ReLU on its output. What is the output? & \\ \hline 5. Compute the ReLU output of neuron C which takes the output of neuron & $1.5$ \\ A with weight $1$ and neuron B with weight $2$ and offset $1$. Neuron B has & \\ input $0$ and offset $1$. Neuron A has input $-1$ and offset $2$ with offset $0.5$. & \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Example neural network questions and answers generated by our model.} \label{tab:results_neural_networks_2} \end{table}

2107.01238v1

\begin{table} \centering \small \begin{tabular}{|l|c|} \hline \textbf{Convolutional Neural Networks Questions} & \textbf{Answer} \\ \hline \hline 1. An image $I$ has length $5$ and filter $F$ has length $2$, what is the length & $4$\\ of the result of applying $F$ to $I$? & \\ \hline 2. The row of an image $[1, 1, 1]$ has a filter $[0, 3, 0]$ applied to it. What is & $3$ \\ the resulting value if they both align? & \\ \hline 3. What is the minimum number of padding needed to maintain the same & $8$ \\ output size if the input image is $50$ by $50$ and the filter is $17$ by $17$? & \\ \hline 4. Given that there are $22$ inputs to a zero-padded max pooling layer and & $11$ \\ a stride length of $2$, compute the number of output units if we also know the & \\ pooling filter size of $3$? & \\ \hline 5. What is the length of the output when we use an image of length $52$ & $24$ \\ and a filter of length $5$ if we use a stride length of $2$? & \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Example convolutional neural network questions and answers generated by our model.} \label{tab:results_convolutional_neural_networks} \end{table}

2107.01238v1

\begin{table} \centering \small \begin{tabular}{|l|c|} \hline \textbf{Recurrent Neural Networks Questions} & \textbf{Answer} \\ \hline \hline 1. Consider a very simple RNN, defined by the following equation: & $0.525$\\ $s_t = w*s_{t-1} + x_t$. Given $s_0 = 0$, $w = 0.1$, and $x = [0.25, 0.5]$, & \\ what is $s_2$? & \\ \hline 2. An RNN is defined as $s_t = w*s_{t-1} + x_t$. If $s_0 = 1$, $w = 1$, and & $5$\\ $x = [2, 2, 0]$, what is $s_3$? & \\ \hline 3. What is the RNN result $s_2$ if $s_0 = 2$, $w = 0$, and $x = [9, 5]$ if & $5$\\ we let $s_t = w*s_{t-1} + x_t$? & \\ \hline 4. We define an RNN as $s_t = w*s_{t-1} + x_t$. What is $s_2$ if $s_0 = 3$, & $3.75$\\ $w = 0.5$, and $x = [2, 2]$? & \\ \hline 5. Let $s_0 = 1.5$, $w = 1.5$, and $x = [1, 0, 2]$. Compute $s_3$ if & $9.31$\\ $s_t = w*s_{t-1} + x_t$. & \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Example recurrent neural network questions and answers generated by our model.} \label{tab:results_recurrent_neural_networks} \end{table}

2107.01238v1

\begin{table} \centering \small \begin{tabular}{|l|c|} \hline \textbf{State Machines and MDP Questions} & \textbf{Answer} \\ \hline \hline 1. Let a state machine be described with the equations $s_t = $ & $18$\\ $f(s_{t-1}, x_t)$ and $y_t = g(s_t)$, where $x_t$ is the input. If $s_0 = 6$, &\\ $f(s_{t-1}, x_t) = \max(s_{t-1}, x_t)$, and $g(s_t) = s_t$, what is the output &\\ $y_3$ after the inputs $[16, 9, 18]$? & \\ \hline 2. If we have a state machine, defined as $s_t = f(s_{t-1}, x_t)$ and & $0$\\ $y_t = g(s_t)$, where $x_t$ is the input, what is the output $y_3$ &\\ if we have $s_0 = 14$, $f(s_{t-1}, x_t) = \max(s_{t-1}, x_t)$, $g(s_t) = 0s_t$, & \\ and we input $[14, 15, 9]$? & \\ \hline 3. Consider the input $x_t = [7, 14, 13, 10]$ to a state machine with & $56$\\ equations $s_t = f(s_{t-1}, x_t)$ and $y_t = g(s_t)$. Compute $y_4$ &\\ if our initial conditions are $s_0 = 2$, $f(s_{t-1}, x_t) = \max(s_{t-1}, x_t)$, & \\ and $g(s_t) = 4s_t$. & \\ \hline 4. A state machine is defined by the equations $s_t = f(s_{t-1}, x_t)$ & $51$\\ and $y_t = g(s_t)$. Given the conditions $s_0 = 7$, $f(s_{t-1}, x_t) = $ & \\ $\max(s_{t-1}, x_t)$, and $g(s_t) = 3s_t$, compute $y_5$ if the input is & \\ $x_t = [17, 4, 14, 2, 16]$. & \\ \hline 5. What is the output $y_5$ of a state machine with equations & $76$ \\ $s_t = f(s_{t-1}, x_t)$ and $y_t = g(s_t)$, conditions $s_0 = 10$, $f(s_{t-1}, x_t) = $ &\\ $\max(s_{t-1}, x_t)$, and $g(s_t) = 4s_t$, and input $x_t = [19, 17, 5, 9, 18]$? &\\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Example state machines and MDP questions and answers generated by our model.} \label{tab:results_state_machines_mdps} \end{table}

2107.01238v1

\begin{table} \centering \small \begin{tabular}{|l|c|} \hline \textbf{Reinforcement Learning Questions} & \textbf{Answer} \\ \hline \hline 1. What is the updated Q value of a tuple (s, a) if $q = 7$, the $a = 0.1$, & $6.9$\\ and $t = 6$? & \\ \hline 2. If $q = 8$, what is its updated value after applying Q learning if & $7.6$\\ $a = 0.1$ and $t = 4$? & \\ \hline 3. Let $q = 2$. After Q learning, what is $q$ if $a = 0.3$ and $t = 8$? & $3.8$\\ \hline 4. If $a = 0.4$ and $t = 10$, what is the Q learning value after applying & $7.6$\\ one tuple (s, a) if $q = 6$? & \\ \hline 5. After applying Q learning to $q = 4$, what is its value? Let the & $8.8$\\ $t = 10$ and $a = 0.8$. & \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Example reinforcement learning questions and answers generated by our model.} \label{tab:results_reinforcement_learning} \end{table}

2107.01238v1

\begin{table}[!htb] \centering \begin{tabular}{|p{3cm}|p{7cm}|l|} \hline \multicolumn{1}{|c}{Topic} & \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{Question/Multiple Choice Options} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Our Model's Answers} \\ \hline \hline Basics & \specialcell{\textbf{Question:} What is the magnitude of the \\ vector $[1, 6, 4]$? \\ \textbf{Answer Options:} $[8, 4.12, 2.38, 1.41]$} & $[1.41]$ \\ \hline Perceptrons & \specialcell{\textbf{Question:} Do the two classifiers $[0, 1, 0]$ \\ and $[2, 2, 0]$ represent the same \\ hyperplane? Return $1$ if true and \\ anything else otherwise. \\ \textbf{Answer Options:} $[230.0, -40.0, 23.2, $ \\ $20.0]$} & $[-40, 23.2, 20]$ \\ \hline Features & \specialcell{\textbf{Question:} Consider the point $(0, 2)$, the \\ $\theta = 2$ and the $\theta_0 = 1$. What is the NLL \\ loss? Use natural log, where the base is \\ $2.71828$. \\ \textbf{Answer Options:} $[-0.02, 0.69, 2.06,$ \\ $1.06]$} & $[0.69]$ \\ \hline Logistic regression & \specialcell{\textbf{Question:} Given a function $(2 \theta - 2)^2$, \\ calculate the value of the function after \\ one gradient descent update if $\theta = 1$ and \\ $\eta = 0.01$. \\ \textbf{Answer Options:} $[\infty, 0.1, 0.41, 0]$} & $[0.1, 0.41, 0]$ \\ \hline Regression & \specialcell{\textbf{Question:} Let $1$ be the optimal $\theta$ by \\ mean squared error. Given the \\ datapoints $[(0, 0), (1, -1), (2, y)]$ and \\ $\lambda = 1$, compute the value of $y$. \\ \textbf{Answer Options:} $[-1.61, -0.28, -0.24$ \\ $-0.83]$} & $[-0.24]$ \\ \hline \specialcell{Neural \\ networks I} & \specialcell{\textbf{Question:} If we have a neural network \\ layer with $20$ inputs and $200$ outputs, \\ how many weights (including biases) are \\ needed to describe each connection? \\ \textbf{Answer Options:} $[32000, 80000, 64000,$ \\ $8000]$} & $[64000, 32000, 8000]$ \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Examples of the questions given to the model, the answers generated by the evaluator, and the output answers made by the model in order of the appearance. Note that the final value in output is the correct answer of the question, and the answering stops once the models achieves the correct answer.} \label{tab:input-output-examples_mc1} \end{table}

2107.01238v1

\begin{table}[!htb] \small \centering \begin{tabular}{|p{3cm}|p{7cm}|l|} \hline \multicolumn{1}{|c}{Topic} & \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{Question/Multiple Choice Options} & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{Our Model's Answers} \\ \hline \hline \specialcell{Neural \\ networks II} & \specialcell{\textbf{Question:} Neuron C is the output \\ neuron which applies a ReLU on its \\ output and neuron A is the input neuron \\ to a neural network. Compute the output \\ of a neural network with the given \\ architecture and inputs. Neuron C takes \\ in the offset value $oC = 1$ with weight \\ $wOC = 3$. Neuron C takes in the output \\ of neuron A with weight $wAC = 1$. \\ Neuron A takes in the input value \\ $x1 = -1$ with weight $w1 = 2$ and offset \\ value $oA = 0.5$ and offset weight \\ $wOC = 3$. \\ \textbf{Answer Options:} $[3, 2.63, 0, 1.5]$} & $[3, 2.63, 1.5]$ \\ \hline \specialcell{Convolutional \\ neural \\ networks} & \specialcell{\textbf{Question:} Using a stride length of $2$, \\ what is the output from applying a filter \\ of length $7$ to an image of length $52$? \\ \textbf{Answer Options:} $[2.2, 25, 22.75, 23]$} & $[23]$ \\ \hline \specialcell{Recurrent \\ neural \\ networks} & \specialcell{\textbf{Question:} An RNN is defined as \\ $s_t = w \times s_{t-1} + x_t$. If $s_0 = 2$, $w = 1$, and \\ $x = [0.25, 0.5]$, what is $s_2$? \\ \textbf{Answer Options:} $[2.75, 0.95, 1.75, 2.63]$} & $[1.75, 0.95, 2.63, 2.75]$ \\ \hline \specialcell{State \\ machines and \\ MDPs} & \specialcell{\textbf{Question:} A state machine is defined by \\ the equations $s_t = f(s_{t-1}, x_t)$ and \\ $y_t = g(s_t)$. Given the conditions $s_0 = 16$, \\ $f(s_{t-1}, x_t) = \max(s_{t-1},x_t)$, and \\ $g(s_t) = 0 * s_t$, compute $y_3$ if the input is \\ $x_t = [8, 7, 9]$. \\ \textbf{Answer Options:} $[9.6, 0, 12.8, 40]$} & $[40, 0]$ \\ \hline \specialcell{Reinforcement \\ learning} & \specialcell{\textbf{Question:} Let $q = 9$. After Q learning, \\ what is $q$ if $a = 0.1$ and $t = 4$? \\ \textbf{Answer Options:} $[3.1, 8.7, 8.5, 8.95]$} & $[8.7, 8.95, 3.1, 8.5]$ \\ \hline Decision trees & \specialcell{\textbf{Question:} What is the entropy of the \\ left side of a region containing $27$ points \\ where the plane has $45$ points in total \\ and $4$ points on the left \\ are positive? \\ \textbf{Answer Options:} $[0.61, 0.299, -0.52, $ \\ $0.297]$} & $[-0.52, 0.61]$ \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Examples of the questions given to the model, the answers generated by the evaluator, and the output answers made by the model in order of the appearance. Note that the final value in output is the correct answer of the question, and the answering stops once the models achieves the correct answer. Thus a single numbers was correct on the first try and longer lists required more attempts.} \label{tab:input-output-examples_mc2} \end{table}

2107.01238v1

\begin{table}[!htb] \centering \small \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|} \hline \textbf{Incorrect Questions} & \textbf{Answer} & \textbf{Solution}\\ \hline \hline 1. Given the values for $\theta = 2$ and $\theta_0 = 1$, compute the & $-0.31$ & $-0.05$ \\ NLL loss on the data point $(-2, 0)$. Use log base $e$ of $2.71828$ & & \\ for the log. & & \\ \hline 2. Consider the point $(2, 2)$, the $\theta = 2$ and the& $3.98$ & $4.99$ \\ $\theta_0 = 1$. What is the NLL loss? Use natural log, where the & & \\ base is $2.71828$. & & \\ \hline 3. Given a loss function, $(-2\theta+3)^4$, for gradient descent, & $2.4$ & $0.4$ \\ compute the updated $\theta$ value after one gradient descent step. & & \\ Let $\theta = 2$ and $\eta = 0.05$. & & \\ \hline 4. The optimal $\theta$ value computed by mean squared error is $1$ & $-0.345$ & $2.75$ \\ using the datapoints $[(0, -1), (1, -2), (2, y)]$. If $\lambda = 0.5$, what & & \\ is $y$? & & \\ \hline 5. Compute the value returned from aligning the filter $[1, 4, 1]$ & $21$ & $18$ \\ to the image $[1, 4, 1]$ on top of one another. & & \\ \hline 6. What is the length of the result from applying $F$ to $I$ if $F$ & $34$ & $74$ \\ has length $17$ and $I$ has length $90$? & & \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Example questions our model incorrectly answers, its answer, and the solution to the question.} \label{tab:results_incorrect} \end{table}

2107.01238v1

\begin{table}[!htb] \centering \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{Description} & \textbf{Text}\\ \hline \hline Question & Let $s_0 = 0$, $w = 1.5$, and $x = (2, 2, 0)$. Compute $s_3$ if \\ & $s_t = w * s_{t-1} + x_t$. \\ \hline Template & Let $s_0 = \{a\}$, $w = \{b\}$, and $x = \{c\}$. Compute $s_{|\{c\}|}$ if \\ & $s_t = w * s_{t-1} + x_t$. \\ \hline Paraphrased Template & An RNN is defined as $s_{t} = w*s_{t-1} + x_{t}$. If $s_{0}$ is $\{a\}$, $w$ is $\{b\}$, \\ & and $x$ is $\{c\}$, what is $s_{|\{c\}|}$?\\ \hline Paraphrased Question & An RNN is defined as $s_{t} = w*s_{t-1} + x_{t}$. If $s_{0}$ is $0$, $w$ is $1.5$, \\ & and $x$ is $(2,2,0)$, what is $s_{3}$?\\ \hline Augmentation & An RNN is defined as $s_{t} = w*s_{t-1} + x_{t}$. If $s_{0}$ is $1$, $w$ is $0.5$, \\ & and $x$ is $(0.25, 0.25)$, what is $s_2$?\\ \hline Expression & $s_{3} = w * (w * (w * s_{0} + x_1) + x_2) + x_3$ \\ \hline Values & $s_{3} = 1.5 * (1.5 * (1.5 * 0 + 2) + 2) + 0$ \\ \hline Answer & 7.5 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{An example of converting an original question into a new one containing different values and phrasing. Note that $| \cdot |$ represents taking the length of the input.} \label{tab:data_augmentation} \end{table}

2107.01238v1

\begin{table}[!htb] \centering \small \begin{tabular}{|l|c|} \hline \textbf{Hyperparameters} & \textbf{T5 Transformer}\\ \hline Learning rate & 1e-4 \\ Batch size & 32 \\ Epochs & 25 \\ Number of embeddings & 100 \\ Number of hidden layers & 512 \\ Number of layers & 3 \\ Number of heads & 8 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \caption{Hyperparameters of the T5 Transformer.} \label{tab:hyperparameters} \end{table}

1811.12629v4

\begin{table}[!ht] \begin{adjustwidth}{-2.25in}{0in} % Comment out/remove adjustwidth environment if table fits in text column. \centering \caption{\label{tab:6}{\bf Summary of the evaluation dataset.}} \begin{tabular}{ |c|c|c| } \hline \empty & representation & count\\ \hline $SUBJECT\_ID$ & integer: IDs ranging from 2 to 99,999 & 30,000 \\ \hline $GENDER$ & binary: 0 for female and 1 for male & 17,284/12,716 \\ \hline $AGE\_GROUP$ & binary: 0 for ages less than or equal to 65 and 1 for greater & 13,947/16,053 \\ \hline $MORTALITY$ & binary: 0 for survival and 1 for expired & 20,841/9,159 \\ \hline $DRUGS$ & binary: 0 for not prescribed to patients and 1 for prescribed & 2814 dimensions \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{adjustwidth} \end{table}

1811.12629v4

\begin{table}[!ht] \begin{adjustwidth}{-2.25in}{0in} % Comment out/remove adjustwidth environment if table fits in text column. \centering \caption{\label{tab:7}\bf {Example rows and columns of DRUGS.}} \begin{tabular}{ |c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c| } \hline SUBJECT$\_$ID & D5W & Heparin Sodium & Nitro-glycerine & Docusate Sodium & Insulin & Atropine Sulphate & ...\\ \hline ... & ...&...&...&...&...&...&... \\ \hline 9 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & ... \\ \hline 10 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & ... \\ \hline 11 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 1 & 0 & ... \\ \hline 12 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & ... \\ \hline 13 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & ... \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{adjustwidth} \end{table}

1811.12629v4

\begin{table}[!ht] \begin{adjustwidth}{-2.25in}{0in} % Comment out/remove adjustwidth environment if table fits in text column. \centering \caption{\label{tab:1}\bf IID scenario: 10-fold cross validation results with varying $C$ and $E$.} \begin{tabular}{|P{1cm}|P{0.7cm}|P{3.0cm}|P{2.3cm}|P{3.0cm}|P{2.3cm}|P{1cm}|} \hline \multirow{2}{*}{$C$}&\multirow{2}{*}{$E$}&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{FedAvg}&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{LoAdaBoost}&\multirow{2}{*}{$p$-value} \\ \cline{3-6} & & AUC & average epochs & AUC & average epochs & \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{10\%} & 5 & 0.7891+-0.0002 & 75 & 0.7940+-0.0001 & 68 & 0.03\\ \cline{2-7} &10& 0.7876+-0.0010 & 100 & 0.7900+-0.0007 & 73 & 0.03 \\ \cline{2-7} &15& 0.7897+-0.0006 & 75 & 0.7907+-0.0010 & 52 & 0.03\\ \hline 20\% & 5 & 0.7905+-0.0003 & 75 & 0.7971+-0.0005 & 69 & 0.03 \\ \hline 50\% & 5 & 0.7903+-0.0003 & 80 & 0.7932+-0.0005 & 75 & 0.03\\ \hline 100\% & 5 & 0.7888+-0.0002 & 75 & 0.7887+-0.0003 & 72 & 0.78\\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{adjustwidth} \end{table}

1811.12629v4

\begin{table}[!ht] \begin{adjustwidth}{-2.25in}{0in} % Comment out/remove adjustwidth environment if table fits in text column. \centering \caption{\label{tab:2}\bf Non-IID scenario: 10-fold cross validation results with varying $\alpha$ and $\beta$.} \begin{tabular}{|P{0.7cm}|P{1.0cm}|P{3.0cm}|P{2.3cm}|P{3.0cm}|P{2.3cm}|P{1cm}|} \hline \multirow{2}{*}{$\beta$}&\multirow{2}{*}{$\alpha$}&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{FedAvg with data sharing}&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{LoAdaBoost with data sharing}&\multirow{2}{*}{$p$-value} \\ \cline{3-6} & & AUC & average epochs & AUC & average epochs & \\ \hline \multirow{3}{*}{1\%} & 10\% & 0.7842+-0.0016 & 40 & 0.7916+-0.0015 & 36 & 0.03\\ \cline{2-7} &20\% & 0.7954+-0.0012 & 40 & 0.8016+-0.0015 & 35 & 0.03 \\ \cline{2-7} &30\% & 0.8167+-0.0011 & 40 & 0.8203+-0.0011 & 34 & 0.03\\ \hline 2\% & 10\% & 0.7913+-0.0010 & 40 & 0.7984+-0.0008 & 35 & 0.03 \\ \hline 3\% & 10\% & 0.8033+-0.0010 & 40 & 0.8063+-0.0010 & 34 & 0.03 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{adjustwidth} \end{table}

1811.12629v4

\begin{table}[!ht] \begin{adjustwidth}{-2.25in}{0in} % Comment out/remove adjustwidth environment if table fits in text column. \centering \caption{\label{tab:3}\bf Non-IID scenario: 10-fold cross validation results with varying $C$.} \begin{tabular}{|P{1cm}|P{3.0cm}|P{2.3cm}|P{3.0cm}|P{2.3cm}|P{1cm}|} \hline \multirow{2}{*}{$C$}&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{FedAvg with data sharing}&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{LoAdaBoost with data sharing}&\multirow{2}{*}{$p$-value} \\ \cline{2-5} & AUC & average epochs & AUC & average epochs & \\ \hline 10\% & 0.7842+-0.0016 & 40 & 0.7916+-0.0015 & 36 & 0.03 \\ \hline 20\% & 0.7869+-0.0008 & 50 & 0.7893+-0.0005 & 46 & 0.03 \\ \hline 50\% & 0.7831+-0.0005 & 40 & 0.7877+-0.0006 & 35 & 0.03 \\ \hline 100\% & 0.7609+-0.0004 & 40 & 0.7900+-0.0003 & 35 & 0.03 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{adjustwidth} \end{table}

1811.12629v4

\begin{table}[!ht] \begin{adjustwidth}{-2.25in}{0in} % Comment out/remove adjustwidth environment if table fits in text column. \centering \caption{\label{tab:4}\bf Summary of the eICU dataset.} \begin{tabular}{ |c|c|c| } \hline \empty & representation & count\\ \hline $PATIENT\_UNIT\_STAY\_ID$ & integer: six-digit patient ID & 22,500 \\ \hline $HOSPITAL\_ID$ & integer: hospital IDs ranging from 63 to 458 &45 \\ \hline $MORTALITY$ & binary: 0 for survival and 1 for expired & 21393/1107 \\ \hline $DRUGS$ & binary: 0 for not prescribed to patients and 1 for prescribed & 1399 dimensions \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{adjustwidth} \end{table}

1811.12629v4

\begin{table}[!ht] \begin{adjustwidth}{-2.25in}{0in} % Comment out/remove adjustwidth environment if table fits in text column. \centering \caption{\label{tab:5}\bf Evaluation on eICU data: 10-fold cross validation results.} \begin{tabular}{|P{3.5cm}|P{5.0cm}|P{2.5cm}|P{2.3cm}|P{1.2cm}|} \hline data distribution & method & AUC & average epochs & $p$-value \\ \hline \multirow{2}{*}{IID} & FedAvg & 0.5693+-0.0057 &400&\multirow{2}{*}{0.03} \\ \cline{2-4} & LoAdaBoost &0.6057+-0.0077& 262 & \\ \hline \multirow{4}{*}{non-IID} &FedAvg& 0.6512+-0.0043& 300& \multirow{2}{*}{0.03}\\ \cline{2-4} &LoAdaBoost& 0.6548+-0.0048& 271& \\ \cline{2-5} &FedAvg with data-sharing& 0.6253+-0.0088& 350& \multirow{2}{*}{0.03}\\ \cline{2-4} &LoAdaBoost with data-sharing& 0.6412+-0.0065& 272& \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{adjustwidth} \end{table}

1812.00564v1

\begin{table}[htbp] \centering \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Method} & \textbf{100 Clients} & \textbf{500 Clients} \\ \hline \textbf{Large Batch SGD} & 29.4 TFlops & 5.89 TFlops \\ \hline \textbf{Federated Learning} & 29.4 TFlops & 5.89 TFlops \\ \hline \textbf{SplitNN} & 0.1548 TFlops & 0.03 TFlops \\ \hline \end{tabular} \vspace{1em} \caption{Computation resources consumed per client when training CIFAR 10 over VGG (in teraflops) are drastically lower for SplitNN than Large Batch SGD and Federated Learning.} \vspace{-1.8em} \end{table}

1812.00564v1

\begin{table}[!htbp] \centering \begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|} \hline \textbf{Method} & \textbf{100 Clients} & \textbf{500 Clients} \\ \hline \textbf{Large Batch SGD} & 13 GB & 14 GB \\ \hline \textbf{Federated Learning} & 3 GB & 2.4 GB \\ \hline \textbf{SplitNN} & 6 GB & 1.2 GB \\ \hline \end{tabular} \vspace{1em} \caption{Computation bandwidth required per client when training CIFAR 100 over ResNet (in gigabytes) is lower for splitNN than large batch SGD and federated learning with a large number of clients. For setups with a smaller number of clients, federated learning requires a lower bandwidth than splitNN. Large batch SGD methods popular in data centers use a heavy bandwidth in both settings.} \end{table}

2109.01374v1

\begin{table}[tb] \caption{Query workload} \begin{center} \begin{tabular}{|c|l|} %\textbf{ Workload} & \textbf{AURA-PMI} & \textbf{AUDAL-Bench-1} & \textbf{AUDAL-Bench-2}\\ %\hline % \textbf{Order} & \textbf{Query statement} \\ % \hline \hline \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\textbf{\textit{Data retrieval queries}}} \\ \hline %\hline 1 & Retrieve documents written in English and edited in December \\ \hline 2 & Retrieve objects (tables or documents) containing the terms ``big'' and ``data'' \\ \hline 3 & Retrieve objects with terms ``big'', ``data'', ``document'' and ``article'' \\ \hline 4 & Retrieve 3 tables, joinable to any table. \\ \hline 5 & %Calculate document scores w.r.t. the terms ``big'' and ``data'' Retrieve 5 most similar documents to a given document\\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\textbf{\textit{Textual content analysis}}} \\ \hline 6 & Calculate document scores w.r.t. the terms ``big'', ``data'', ``article''\\ & and ``document'' \\ \hline 7 & Extract a concordance from documents using the terms ``data'' and ``ai'' \\ \hline 8 & Extract a concordance from documents using the terms ``data'', ``ai'' ``article'' \\ & and ``paper'' \\ \hline 9 & Find top 10 keywords from all documents \\ \hline 10 & Run a 3-cluster KMeans clustering on documents grouped by month \\ \hline 11 & Run a PCA analysis on documents grouped by month. \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\textbf{\textit{Tabular content analysis}}} \\ \hline 12 & Run a join query between two tables \\ \hline 13 & Run a join query between two tables while averaging all numerical values \\ & and aggregating by any categorical column. \\ \hline 14 & Run a 3-cluster KMeans clustering on the result of \textit{query 12} \\ \hline 15 & Run a PCA on the result of \textit{query 12}. \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{center} \label{tab:queries} \end{table}

2109.01374v1

\begin{table}[hbt] \begin{minipage}{.5\textwidth} \caption{Query response time (ms)} \begin{center} \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|} %\textbf{ Workload} & \textbf{AURA-PMI} & \textbf{AUDAL-Bench-1} & \textbf{AUDAL-Bench-2}\\ \hline \textbf{Query} & \textbf{AURA-PMI} & \textbf{Artificial} \\ & \textbf{dataset} & \textbf{dataset} \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{\textbf{\textit{Data retrieval queries}}} \\ \hline %\hline Query 1 & 194 & 653 \\ \hline Query 2 & 108 & 207 \\ \hline Query 3 & 143 & 305 \\ \hline Query 4 & 59 & 81 \\ \hline Query 5 & 51 & 79 \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{\textbf{\textit{Textual content analysis}}} \\ \hline Query 6 & 85 & 117 \\ \hline Query 7 & 169 & 198 \\ \hline Query 8 & 62 & 92 \\ \hline Query 9 & 4,629& 188,199\\ \hline Query 10 & 1,930 & 26,969 \\ \hline Query 11 & 1,961& 26,871 \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{\textbf{\textit{Tabular content analysis}}} \\ \hline Query 12 & 71 & 37 \\ \hline Query 13 & 61 & 12 \\ \hline Query 14 & 174 & 144 \\ \hline Query 15 & 670 & 520 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \end{center} \label{tab:results1} \end{minipage}% This must go next to `\end{minipage}` \begin{minipage}{.5\textwidth} \begin{center} \caption{Raw data vs. metadata size (GB)} \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|} %\textbf{ Workload} & \textbf{AURA-PMI} & \textbf{AUDAL-Bench-1} & \textbf{AUDAL-Bench-2}\\ \hline \textbf{System} & \textbf{AURA-PMI} & \textbf{Artificial} \\ & \textbf{dataset} & \textbf{dataset} \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{\textbf{\textit{Raw data}}} \\ \hline - & \textbf{6.2} & \textbf{62.7} \\ \hline \hline \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{\textbf{\textit{Metadata}}} \\ \hline Neo4J & 0.9 & 2.0 \\ \hline SQLite & 0.003 & 1.7 \\ \hline MongoDB & 0.28 & 3.4\\ \hline ElasticSearch & 1.6 & 27.6\\ \hline \textbf{Total }& \textbf{2.8} &\textbf{34.7} \\ \hline \hline \end{tabular} \end{center} \label{tab:results2} \end{minipage} \end{table}