update

example_data_definition_1.json

@@ -1,91 +1,91 @@
 {
   "main_profile": {
     "VISION": {
-      "score": "LOW",
+      "score": "56",
       "summary": "Sees the ‘big picture’ and maintains line of sight"
     },
     "INTEGRITY": {
-      "score": "LOW",
+      "score": "39",
       "summary": "Genuine, honest and straightforward. Authentic"
     },
     "AUTHORITY": {
-      "score": "LOW",
+      "score": "49",
       "summary": "Takes charge of situations; controls and directs"
     },
     "INFLUENCE": {
-      "score": "LOW",
+      "score": "41",
       "summary": "Affects how others think and feel without control or direction"
     },
     "IDEATION": {
-      "score": "LOW",
+      "score": "44",
       "summary": "Generates original and/or innovative ideas; makes unexpected connections"
     },
     "OPPORTUNISM": {
-      "score": "LOW",
+      "score": "55",
       "summary": "Alert to opportunity; prepared to seize opportunities"
     },
     "CONFIDENCE": {
-      "score": "LOW",
+      "score": "29",
       "summary": "Self-belief/confidence across different domains"
     },
-    "DRIVE": {
-      "score": "HIGH",
+    "Proactivity": {
+      "score": "38",
       "summary": "Strong desire to accomplish goals. Propensity to act decisively and get things done."
     },
     "DISCIPLINE": {
-      "score": "LOW",
+      "score": "41",
       "summary": "Planned rather than spontaneous behaviour. Attention to detail and accuracy. Organises and plans to achieve goals"
     },
     "AGILITY": {
-      "score": "LOW",
+      "score": "44",
       "summary": "Switches easily between different cognitive processes. Comfortable with ill-defined problems and situations. Adaptable and constructive."
     },
     "RESILIENCE": {
-      "score": "LOW",
+      "score": "44",
       "summary": "Remains calm and optimistic under pressure. Perseveres in the face of adversity. Recovers from setbacks."
     }
   },
   "red_flag": {
-    "HUBRIS": {
-      "score": "HIGH",
+    "PROUD": {
+      "score": "45",
       "summary": "Conceit and self-importance. Overestimation of knowledge and/or ability in respect of tasks. Misplaced belief in unique or exceptional abilities"
     },
-    "MERCURIAL": {
-      "score": "HIGH",
+    "UNPREDICTABLE": {
+      "score": "64",
       "summary": "Given to sudden changes of mood, behaviour or direction. Given to unconventional or strange behaviour or beliefs. Difficult to predict and/or surprising."
     },
-    "DOMINANT": {
-      "score": "HIGH",
+    "FORCEFUL": {
+      "score": "53",
       "summary": "Forceful, insistent, domineering. Hostile and argumentative. Unyielding in the face of evidence or argument."
     },
-    "MACHIAVELLIAN": {
-      "score": "HIGH",
+    "CALCULATING": {
+      "score": "55",
       "summary": "Deliberate deceitfulness in the pursuit on one’s interest; acting in bad faith. Ruthless pursuit of own interests regardless of considerations of right or wrong. General distrust of the motives of others; attribution of bad faith."
     }
   },
   "motivation": {
     "Purpose": {
-      "score": "High",
+      "score": "50",
       "summary": "The sense of meaningfulness and direction in one\"s work or activities. It is the intrinsic motivation derived from believing that one’s efforts contribute to a larger goal or vision."
     },
     "Mastery": {
-      "score": "High",
+      "score": "36",
       "summary": "The drive to improve and excel in a skill or field. It reflects the desire to gain expertise, proficiency, and competence through learning and practice."
     },
     "Ownership": {
-      "score": "High",
+      "score": "19",
       "summary": "The feeling of responsibility and control over one’s work or tasks. It involves having a personal stake in outcomes and the autonomy to make decisions."
     },
     "Connection": {
-      "score": "High",
+      "score": "48",
       "summary": "The sense of belonging and interpersonal relationships within a group or organization. It includes feeling valued, understood, and supported by others."
     },
     "Reward": {
-      "score": "High",
+      "score": "44",
       "summary": "The external incentives and recognition received for one’s efforts. It encompasses financial compensation, bonuses, promotions, and other tangible benefits."
     },
     "Power": {
-      "score": "High",
+      "score": "68",
       "summary": "The capacity to influence others and effect change. It relates to having authority, control, and the ability to shape decisions and outcomes within an organization or group."
     }
   },

prompts.json

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
             "### Questions ###",
 
             "1. Write an overall short summary with the title: \"Profile summary (You)\" of the profile consider different traits and scores of that individual. When answering this question, address the individual directly using 'you' instead of their name. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores.",
-            "2. Analyze only the Main Profile and Red Flags Profile. Identify key strengths, weaknesses(area for development), and potential risks (In Bullet Points with headers, for example: Vision (High) and Influence (High),.....,etc., do not output scores) with the title:  \"STRENGTHS\", \"AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT\" for main profile and \"RISKS\" for red flag, considering the relationship between trait scores i.e. what the combination of scores tells us. in {{INDIVIDUAL_NAME}}'s professional role in the leadership context, considering relationship between trait scores i.e. what do the combination of scores tell us; If no Red Flags have HIGH, remove the Risks section, do not care about the risk if the socre is AVERAGE or LOW. When answering this question, address the individual directly using \"you\" instead of their name. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores. Do not include any Motivation Profiles in this section.",
+            "2. Analyze only the Main Profile and Red Flags Profile. Identify key strengths, areas for development, and potential risks under the headings \"STRENGTHS\", \"AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT\", and \"RISKS\" using bullet points. Consider the relationships between trait scores and what their combinations indicate about {{INDIVIDUAL_NAME}}'s professional role in a leadership context. Include only traits ≥ 67 in STRENGTHS; if none are ≥ 67, then include traits ≥ 50. Place traits < 50 in AREAS FOR DEVELOPMENT. For RISKS, include only Red Flag traits ≥ 67 and remove the \"RISKS\" section if there are none. Do not include any Motivation Profiles. When answering, address the individual directly using \"you\" instead of their name, and ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on their scores.",
             "3. Analyze only the Motivation profile (In Bullet Points with headers (High Motivation, Average Motivation, Low Motivation), each header should have the trait analysis Reward, Connection,.....) with the title: \"Motivation (You)\". When answering this question, address the individual directly using 'you' instead of their name. Ensure traits are ordered from highest to lowest based on the scores.",
             "Your response for each question should be very indepth and professional and organized under clear headings, with each point supported by specific examples from the {{INDIVIDUAL_NAME}}'s profiles and provide the individual at least 5 points for each question. Remember do not write any conclusion and do not disclose the bio, age, occupation, and PII."
         ],