Hugging Face's logo
Yi Cui's picture
12 17 1

Yi Cui

onekq
kornif's profile picture DhanushTutu's profile picture ramanbansal's profile picture
·
https://onekq.ai

AI & ML interests

Benchmark, Code Generation Model

Recent Activity

posted an update about 13 hours ago
Qwen made good students, DeepSeek made a genius. This is my summaries of their differentiations. I don't think these two players are coordinated but they both have clear goals. One is to build ecosystem and the other is to push AGI. And IMO they are both doing really well.
replied to their post about 13 hours ago
The performance of deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b is abysmal. I know Qwen instruct (not coder) is quite poor on coding. As such, I have low expectation on other R1 repro works also based on Qwen instruct too. https://huggingface.co/collections/onekq-ai/r1-reproduction-works-67a93f2fb8b21202c9eedf0b This makes it particularly mysterious what went into QwQ-32B? Why did it work so well? Was it trained from scratch? Anyone has insights about this? https://huggingface.co/spaces/onekq-ai/WebApp1K-models-leaderboard
updated a model about 13 hours ago
onekq-ai/OneSQL-v0.1-Qwen-32B-GGUF
View all activity

Organizations

MLX Community's profile picture ONEKQ AI's profile picture

onekq's activity

posted an update about 13 hours ago
view post
Post
376
Qwen made good students, DeepSeek made a genius.

This is my summaries of their differentiations. I don't think these two players are coordinated but they both have clear goals. One is to build ecosystem and the other is to push AGI.

And IMO they are both doing really well.
  • 1 reply
·
replied to their post about 13 hours ago
view reply

Ah I see. Thanks!

Still the blogpost didn't mention what the base model is (if any).
updated a model about 13 hours ago
published a model 1 day ago
updated 2 models 1 day ago
replied to their post 1 day ago
view reply

Cool! I will check it out.

What I meant by switching is this. Sometimes I'm not satisfied with ChatGPT answer, and realized it needs to think harder. So I switched to o1 and asked again, and most of the times the answer gets better. Then I asked a simple follow-up question which o1 overanalyzed. Then I had to switch back to gpt-4o. I don't actually have the foresight which model fits my question the best. I only know it after I read the answer which is too late.

Now imagine a conversation with a human expert. A human can do such switching remarkably well, hence a cool conversation. This can be actually a metric to read the mileage of an applicant.
updated a collection 1 day ago
posted an update 2 days ago
view post
Post
1351
The performance of deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b is abysmal. I know Qwen instruct (not coder) is quite poor on coding. As such, I have low expectation on other R1 repro works also based on Qwen instruct too. onekq-ai/r1-reproduction-works-67a93f2fb8b21202c9eedf0b

This makes it particularly mysterious what went into QwQ-32B? Why did it work so well? Was it trained from scratch? Anyone has insights about this?
onekq-ai/WebApp1K-models-leaderboard
  • 3 replies
·
updated a Space 2 days ago
published 2 models 2 days ago
updated a Space 2 days ago
updated 2 models 3 days ago
posted an update 3 days ago
view post
Post
714
A bigger and harder pain point for reasoning model is to switch modes.

We now have powerful models capable of either system I thinking or system II thinking, but not both, much less switching between the two. But humans can do this quite easily.

ChatGPT and others push the burden to users to switch between models. I guess this is the best we have now.
  • 2 replies
·
posted an update 6 days ago
view post
Post
3223
QwQ-32B is amazing!

It ranks below o1-preview, but beats DeepSeek v3 and all Gemini models.
onekq-ai/WebApp1K-models-leaderboard

Now we have such a powerful model that can fit into a single GPU, can someone finetune a web app model to push SOTA of my leaderboard? 🤗
  • 1 reply
·
posted an update 8 days ago
view post
Post
544
From my own experience these are the pain points for reasoning model adoption.

(1) expensive and even worse, slow, due to excessive token output. You need to 10x your max output length to avoid clipping the thinking process.

(2) you have to filter thinking tokens to retrieve the final output. For mature workflows, this means broad or deep refactoring.

1p vendors (open-source and proprietary) ease these pain points by manipulating their own models. But the problems are exposed when the reasoning model is hosted by 3p MaaS providers.