Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet
image
imagewidth (px)
375
640
label
int64
1
1
explanation
stringclasses
10 values
1
Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and focus seem consistent with natural conditions, and the structural components of the buildings and the surfer's posture align with realistic expectations. There are no signs of chromatic irregularities, anatomical implausibilities, or other other physical inconsistencies that would suggest otherwise. The spatial relationships between the surfer, the surfboard, and the background scenery also appear natural, and there are no duplicated or omitted components that would indicate a lack of attention to detail.Label:Real
1
Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and shadows seem natural, with the sunlight coming through the window casting realistic patterns on the flowers and vase. The composition of the roses and the vase looks organic, without any any signs of distortion or unnatural repetition. The spatial relationship between the vase, flowers, and window frame also seems plausible, and there there there are no indications of missing or incomplete elements. The texture of the flowers and the vase appears consistent to what one would expect in a photograph of real objects.Label:Real
1
Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and shadows seem natural, with consistent sunlight casting realistic shadows across the ground. The individuals and their objects in the scene appear proportionate and there there is no evidence of duplicated or omitted components. The spatial relationships between the people and objects are logical, and the textures of clothing and skateboards look authentic. There are no signs of chromatic irregularities or illogical anatomical or functional implausibilities. The overall composition and context suggest a candid moment captured in a public space, which is plausible and does not indicate any the presence of sociocultural implausibilities.Label:Real
1
Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a workspace with natural lighting coming through a window. The objects placement, shadows, and reflections seem consistent with typical office environments. There are no signs of chromatic irregularities, structural distortions, or otherom artifacts that would suggest the image as AI-generated. The lighting and focus appear natural, without any luminance discrepancies or localized blur. The spatial relationships between objects are plausible, and there there are no indications of physics violations or sociocultural implausibilities. The textures and colors of the objects, such as the plant leaves and the desk surface, look realistic, lacking the unnatural appearance often seen in AI-generated images.Label:Real
1
Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a skierier addCriterionLabel:Real
1
Reason: The image appears to depict a tennis player in motion on a grass court. The lighting and shadows seem consistent with natural outdoor conditions, and there the player鈥檚 posture and movement are realistic for a tennis serve. There are no signs of localized blur, structural distortions, or chromatic irregularities that would suggest artificial generation. The player's clothing and equipment also appear authentic, and the overall composition lacks any obvious physical implausibilities or sociocultural inconsistencies.Label:Real
1
Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a meal consisting of a sandwich and fries with a side of dipping sauce. There are no visible signs of distortion, duplication, or omission of components that would suggest it is AI-generated. The lighting and focus seem consistent, with natural shadows and textures that are are typical of a real photograph. The spatial relationships between the food and the plate also are also correctly aligned, and there there are no chromatic irregularities or anomalies in the texture of the food or the plate. The overall composition and detail of the food and the plate are are consistent with what one would expect in a real-life setting.Label:Real
1
Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a cat sitting inside a kitchen sink. It lacks any the artifacts typically associated with AI-generated images, such as unnatural lighting, distorted components, or illogical spatial relationships. The lighting seems natural, the textures of the objects like the tiles and the cat's fur look realistic, and there the overall composition is plausible for a domestic setting.Label:Real
1
Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of an Air Canada airplane on the tarmac at an airport. There are no visible artifacts indicating from the provided taxonomy that would suggest it is AI-generated. The lighting and shadows seem natural, there does not exhibit any localized blur or structural distortions, and the spatial relationships between the airplane and its surroundings appear realistic. The airplane's texture and colors are consistent with typical aircraft paint jobs, and there there is no evidence of illegible text or awkward facial expressions. The image does not violate physical laws, nor does it contain sociocultural implausibilities. The overall composition and details in the image are consistent with what one would expect from a real photograph.Label:Real
1
Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a cat resting on a patterned armchair. There are no visible artifacts indicating the lighting, focus, structural, spatial, text, physical, physical, or sociocultural implausibilities. The cat's fur texture, the chair's fabric pattern, and the overall composition suggest natural and realistic qualities without any any any inconsistencies or anomalies typically associated with AI-generated images artifacts.Label:Real
README.md exists but content is empty.
Downloads last month
35