Dataset Viewer
image
imagewidth (px) 160
4.1k
| label
int64 0
1
| explanation
stringlengths 63
1.51k
|
|---|---|---|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and focus seem natural, with consistent shadows and realistic luminosity. The structural components of the buildings and the surfer's body appear proportionate and without any obvious deformities. The spatial relationship between the surfer and the environment looks plausible, and there there are no chromatic irregularities or abnormal textures. The surfer's pose and the water's movement also appear consistent as expected, and there there are no illogible letters or awkward facial expressions. The overall composition and context suggest a real-world scene without any any evident violations of physics or sociocultural implausibilities.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and shadows seem natural, with the sunlight coming through the window casting realistic patterns on the flowers and vase. The composition of the roses and the vase looks plausible, without any any any signs of duplication or distortion. The spatial relationship between the vase, flowers, and window frame also also seems consistent correct, with no indications of abnormal non interactions or placements. The texture of the flowers and the vase appears consistent consistent realistic, lacking any any unnatural colors or textures. There are no signs of missing or incomplete elements, suggesting indicating the image complete is complete complete.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and shadows seem natural, with consistent sunlight casting realistic shadows across the ground. The individuals and their objects in the image appear to be in proportionate and realistic. There are no signs of duplicated or omitted components, nor do the people or objects exhibit display unnatural colors or textures. The spatial relationships between the individuals and objects are logical, and the background environment looks like a typical urban park setting.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a workspace with natural lighting coming through a window. The objects placement, shadows, and reflections seem consistent with typical office environments. There are no signs of chromatic irregularities, structural distortions, or spatial anomalies that would suggest artificial generation. The lighting and focus appear natural, without localized blur or impractical luminosity. The objects, such as the plant, chair, and desk, are all placed in realistic positions and proportions. The textures of surfaces like like the desk and chair, are look authentic, and there there are no indications of duplicated components or missing elements.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a skierier
addCriterionLabel:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to depict a tennis player in motion on a grass court. The lighting and shadows seem consistent with outdoor conditions, and there the player's posture and movement are realistic. There are no signs of localized blur, structural distortions, or spatial anomalies that would suggest artificial generation. The player's attire and equipment also appear authentic, and the overall composition lacks any obvious chromatic irregularities or physical implausibilities. Therefore, based on the provided taxonomy, the image seems to be a real photograph of a tennis player in action action.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a photograph of a meal consisting of a sandwich and fries with a side of dipping sauce. There are no visible artifacts that would suggest it is AI-generated. The lighting and focus seem natural, with no signs of localized blur or luminance discrepancy. The objects proportions and textures look realistic, without any showing any distorted components or duplicated components. The spatial arrangement of the food is logical, with no abnormal non-spatial relationships or misplaced objects. The colors and textures of the food match what one would expect for a real meal, with no chromatic irregularities or abnormal textures. The image does not exhibit show any functional implausibilities or physics violations, as the objects behave as expected. There are no soci-cultural implausibilities present, as the image depicts a common meal setting.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a cat sitting in a kitchen sink. It lacks any the artifacts typically associated with AI-generated images, such as unnatural lighting, distorted components, or illogical spatial relationships. The lighting seems natural, the textures of the objects like the tiles and the cat's fur look realistic, and there the overall composition is plausible for a domestic setting.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of an Air Canada airplane on the tarmac at an airport. There are no visible artifacts indicating that it is AI-generated. The lighting and shadows seem natural, with consistent contrasts between the sunlit areas and the shaded parts of the plane. The airplane is positioned correctly relative to the surrounding environment, including there the grass, buildings, and sky. The texture of the airplane and the ground looks realistic, without any any unnatural smoothness or distortion. The text on the airplane is clear and legable, which suggests that it was not generated by AI. The overall composition and perspective are are consistent with what would be expected in a real-world photograph.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a cat resting on a patterned armchair. There are no visible artifacts indicating the lighting, focus, structural, spatial, textural, physical, socioc-cultural, or other other anomalies that would suggest the image to be be AI-generated. The lighting is natural and consistent the shadows are consistent to be be cast by the room and the cat's fur texture looks realistic. The spatial relationship between the cat and the chair is logical, and there there are no signs of duplicated or omitted components.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible signs of distortion, duplication, or unnatural interactions between the objects. The lighting and shadows seem consistent with a typical indoor setting, and the textures of the teddy bears and their the background are natural. There are no chromatic irregularities or anatomical implausibilities evident. The spatial arrangement of the teddy bears is logical, and there the overall composition lacks any any stylistic inconsistencies.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of giraffss
addCriterion for 'Lighting and Focus Artifacts': There are no signs of luminance discrepancy or impractical luminosity, suggesting
addCriterion for 'Structural Artifacts': The giraffaffss
addCriterion for 'Spatial and Contextual Artifacts': The giraffaffaffLabel:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a baseball player in action.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a bathroom. It lacks any the artifacts typically associated with AI-generated images, such as unnatural lighting, distorted components, or unusual spatial relationships. The lighting seems consistent natural, and the objects placement within the room looks plausible. There are no signs of chromatic irregularities or abnormal textures that would suggest digital manipulation. The overall composition and details in the image, such as the tile pattern and the window view, seem consistent consistent consistent to a typical bathroom setting.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and focus seem consistent with natural indoor lighting, and the individuals and objects in the scene appear proportionate and realistic. There are no signs of duplicated components, structural distortions, or unnatural spatial relationships. The individuals' expressions and the overall composition suggest a candid moment, which is plausible for a real photograph. The textures of the objects, like like the cake and tableware, also appear natural without any any unnatural regularities or irregularities. The image does not exhibit any any physical implausibilities or socioc-cultural inconsistencies.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph because there there are no visible artifacts indicating the provided taxonomy. The lighting and focus seem natural, with no signs of luminance discrepancy or localized blur. The structural components like the dog, monitor, and desk appear consistent normal and not deformed or duplicated. There are no spatial or contextual anomalies where objects objects interact unrealistically or are misplaced. The texture of the dog's fur and the computer components looks realistic without any chromatic irregularities or abnormal surfaces. The dog's facial expression seems natural, and there are no illeigable letters or awkward expressions. The physical and functional implausibilities are not evident, and there there are no physics violations or sociocultural implausibilities. The image lacks any out out-of frame or stylistic inconsistencies.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to depict a close-up of a hot dog with visible details in the textures of the bun, meat, lettuce, and picklesles
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterion
addCriterionLabel:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a realistic depiction of a packed suitcase with various items inside, including no visible signs of artificial distortion or anomalies. The lighting seems natural, and there the objects and textures look consistent with real-world materials. There are no indications of duplicated components, structural deformities, or chromatic irregularities. The spatial arrangement of the suitcase, clothing, and other helmet is plausible, and the bag's branding and text are are leg clear and leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg leg legLabel:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of people shopping in a grocery store. It shows natural lighting, realistic shadows, and no signs of distortion or duplication of components.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and shadows seem natural, with consistent illumination across the court and player. There are no signs of localized blur or duplicated components. The structural components of the tennis court and the player's posture are realistic. The spatial relationship between the player, the ball, and the court is logical, and there the player's attire and equipment appear authentic. The image lacks any chromatic irregularities or abnormal textures, and the player's facial expression and body movements are appear natural. There are no indications of anatomical implausibilities or functional implausibilities. The overall composition and context of the image are align with what would be expected in a real-life tennis match.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to depict a realistic airport scene with a ground crew member and an aircraft. There are no visible artifacts indicating that the image is AI-generated. The lighting and shadows seem natural for an outdoor setting, and there the structural components of the aircraft and the ground equipment appear consistent normal. The spatial relationship between the objects is logical, and the textures of the materials look authentic. The image does not exhibit contain any any chromatic irregularities or anatomical implausibilities. Therefore, based on the provided taxonomy, the image is likely real.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to depict a realistic urban street scene with people gathered around motorcycles, which alignss with common street photography. There are no visible signs of distortion, duplication, or omission of components that would suggest AI generation. The lighting and shadows appear consistent to natural daylight, and the individuals and objects in the scene seem to be interact in a plausible manner. The text on signs and the overall composition of the image lack the inconsistencies typically associated with AI-generated images artifacts.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a person lying on a couch while holding what looks like a gaming controller. There are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting seems natural, with no signs of luminance discrepancy or impractical luminosity. The person’s posture and the positioning of the controller suggest a realistic interaction without any any structural or spatial anomalies. The colors and textures of the couch and the person's clothing also appear consistent to be normal, without chromatic irregularities or abnormal textures. The person's facial expression and body position look natural, without awkward expressions or anatomical implausibilities. The overall composition and context of the image do not indicate any any physical or functional implausibilities or sociocultural implausibilities.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and shadows seem natural, with consistent and realistic illumination. The composition includes the cyclist, the road, and the surrounding environment all align logically within the scene. There are no signs of duplicated components, structural deformities, or spatial anomalies. The colors and textures also the image are consistent natural, without any any unnatural hues or textures. The overall scene looks plausible, with no indications of physical implausibilities or socioc-cultural inconsistencies.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and focus seem consistent with natural indoor lighting, and the textures of the cat's fur and the carpet are realistic. There are no signs of duplicated components, structural distortions, or unnatural spatial relationships. The human legs and the cat's positioning also seem plausible, and there there are no chromatic irregularities or anomalies in the physical and functional implausibilities. The image lacks any obvious sociocultural implausibilities or stylistic inconsistencies.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a bathroom. It shows a typical setup with a toilet, sink, and towel rack, all positioned in a way that is consistent with standard bathroom layouts. The lighting and shadows seem natural, and there there are no signs of distortion or duplication of components.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and shadows seem consistent with natural outdoor conditions, and the person's posture and motion are look plausible for someone performing a skateboarding trick. There are no signs of distorted limbs, duplicated components, or missing elements that would suggest otherwise. The spatial relationships between the skateboarder, the rail, and the background also appear realistic, and the texture of the skateboard and the pavement looks authentic. The person's facial expression and body language also also seem natural, and there there are no indications of chromatic irregularities or abnormal textures. Overall, the image lacks the specific artifacts that would typically be present in an AI-generated image according to the provided taxonomy.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a bathroom countertop setup. It shows a typical arrangement with a mug containing toothbrushes, toothpaste, and possibly dental floss. The lighting and shadows seem natural, and there there are no signs of chromatic irregularities or structural distortions. The objects placement and interactions look plausible for a real-life scenario. There are no indications of duplicated components or missing elements that would suggest artificial manipulation. The text on the mug is legible, and the overall composition lacks any any stylis inconsistencies that would be indicative of an AI-generated image.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a historical structure, likely a clock tower or part of a castle, given the architectural style and the presence of a clock embedded within the archway. The lighting is natural and consistent with outdoor nighttime photography, and there the texture of the bricks and stone is realistic without any showing signs of artificial enhancement or distortion. There are no visible artifacts such as chromatic irregularities, structural deformations, or spatial anomalies that would suggest the image is AI-generated. The image captures a plausible scene without any showing any physical implausibilities or sociocultural inconsistencies.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of an elephant in what seems to be a zoo enclosure. There are no visible signs of artificial or unnatural elements that would suggest the image as AI-generated. The lighting and shadows are consistent with natural outdoor conditions, and there the elephant's texture and posture are realistic. The background, including including the fencing and vegetation, also also no obvious distortions or anomalies that would indicate the image has been manipulated. Therefore, based on the provided taxonomy, there the image does not exhibit any any any of the listed artifacts that would suggest it as fake.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a bed with stuffed toys arranged neatly. It lacks any the artifacts typically associated with AI-generated images, such as unnatural lighting, distorted components, or unusual spatial relationships. The lighting seems natural, the toys are positioned realistically, and there there are no signs of duplicated or omitted components. The overall composition and texture of the bedspread and the toys look consistent natural and consistent with what one would expect in a real photograph.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a bathroom. It lacks any the artifacts typically associated with AI-generated images, such as unnatural lighting, distorted components, or illogical spatial relationships. The toilet, sink, mirror, and other other elements are placed in a realistic manner, and there the lighting and shadows are consistent natural. There are no signs of chromatic irregularities or abnormal textures that would suggest digital manipulation. The overall composition and details are consistent consistent with a typical bathroom setting.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a bathroom with a bathtub, toilet, and shower curtain. There are no visible artifacts from the provided taxonomy that would indicate it is AI-generated. The lighting seems natural, and there the objects and textures appear consistent realistic. The spatial relationships between the objects are logical, and there there is no evidence of chromatic irregularities or structural distortions. The image does not exhibit contain any any any sociocultural implausibilities or other other physical violations.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. There are no signs of luminance discrepancy, structural distortions, or spatial anomalies. The lighting and shadows seem consistent natural, and the motorcycle and rider appear to be in in correct proportions and context within the environment. The image lacks the chromatic irregularities or anatomical implausibilities that might indicate artificial generation.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph because there there are no visible artifacts indicating the provided taxonomy. The lighting and focus seem consistent with natural daylight, and the objects of the pizza slice and the road outside in of focus or smeared. The spatial relationship between the hand holding the pizza and the car interior is realistic, and there there are no signs of duplicated or omitted components. The texture of the pizza slice looks natural, and the background scenery of the road and trees is plausible for a highway setting.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of two cats in an indoor setting.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a cat sitting on a couch with a remote control. There are no visible artifacts indicating that it is AI-generated. The lighting and focus seem natural, with the cat and the remote in sharp focus while the background is softly blurred, which is typical for a real photograph. The spatial relationship between the cat and the remote is realistic, and there there are no signs of duplicated components or structural distortions. The texture of the cat’s fur and the couch fabric looks authentic, without any showing any chromatic irregularities or abnormal textures. The cat's expression and the overall composition lack any the awkwardness or illogical interactions that might be indicative of AI generation.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a natural scene with zebras feeding in a grassy area surrounded by trees. There are no visible signs of artificial manipulation or anomalies that would suggest it is AI-generated. The lighting seems consistent with outdoor daylight, and there the zebras and their the trees appear naturally positioned without any the distortions or unnatural interactions. The image lacks the artifacts typically associated with AI-generated images such as chromatic irregularities, structural deformations, or localized blur.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph because there there are no visible artifacts indicating the provided taxonomy. The lighting and focus seem consistent with typical indoor settings, and the objects in the image (laptop, beer bottle, glass, and person) are all plausible and realistic. There are no signs of duplicated components, structural distortions, or spatial anomalies. The colors and textures of the objects are natural, and the human figure appears to be in in a normal pose without any awkward facial expression or anatomical implausibilities. The overall composition and context of the image are also also consistent with a casual dining setting.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a photograph of a bird, likely a pheasant, with natural lighting and no visible distortions or unnatural elements. It does not exhibit the presence of structural, spatial, or textural artifacts that are would typically be indicative of AI generation. The bird's feathers and plumage display realistic coloration and texture, and there the lighting is consistent consistent with natural outdoor conditions. There are no signs of chromatic irregularities or anatomical implausibilities that would suggest the presence of artificial enhancement or manipulation. The overall composition and detail suggest a real-world capture rather than an artificial creation.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and shadows seem consistent with natural outdoor conditions, and the objects of the vehicles and the person are well proportionate and realistic. There are no signs of duplicated components, chromatic irregularities, or anatomical implausibilities. The spatial relationships between the objects are logical, and the overall composition suggests a real-world setting.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a natural outdoor scene with horses grazing in a grassy field under a cloudy sky. There are no visible signs of artificial lighting, duplicated components, or structural deformities. The horses are realistic proportions and textures, and their spatial relationships between them are consistent to what would be expected in a real-world setting. The image lacks any artifacts that would typically indicate it as AI-generated, such as chromatic irregularities, anatomical implausibilities, or physics violations.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a bathroom sink area with a mirror above it. There are no visible artifacts indicating that it is AI-generated. The lighting is consistent and natural, there the shadows align with the light source, and the objects textures, such as the wood grain of the countertop and the smoothness of the sink, look realistic. The spatial relationships between the objects, like as the toothbrush holder and the soap dish, are logical and plausible. There are no signs of chromatic irregularities or duplicated components, and the overall composition is balanced and typical for a bathroom setting.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a bus station with a clear sky, a bus, and a signboard. There are no signs of lighting discrepancies, structural distortions, or unusual spatial relationships that would suggest to an AI-generated image. The bus and signboard look natural, and there the people waiting at the shelter appear to be real individuals. The image lacks the artifacts typically associated with AI-generated images, such as chromatic irregularities, anatomical implausibilities, or functional implausibilities.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a natural photograph with no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The frog and the leaves look realistic in terms of color, texture, and lighting. There are no signs of chromatic irregularities, structural distortions, or spatial anomalies. The frog's posture and the way of interaction with the leaves seem plausible, and there there are no indications of physical implausibilities or violations of physics. The image does not exhibit any stylistic inconsistencies or sociocultural implausibilities.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a photograph of a pizza with chicken, broccoli, and lemon slices toppings. There are no visible artifacts indicating that it is AI-generated. The lighting and focus seem natural, there are no signs of localized blur, duplicated components, or chromatic irregularities. The spatial relationships between the food items look realistic, and there no anatomical implausibilities or functional implausibilities are present. The texture of the pizza crust and toppings looks consistent with a real photograph.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a natural scene with zebras in their the wild. There are no visible signs of artificial manipulation or anomalies that would suggest it is AI-generated. The lighting and shadows seem consistent with outdoor conditions, and the zebras' patterns and textures look realistic. The spatial relationships between the zebras and their the background vegetation also natural. There are no indications of duplicated components, structural distortions, or other other artifacts that would typically be present in an AI-generated image.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to depict a realistic meal setting
!***Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and shadows seem consistent with natural indoor lighting, and the structural components like the seating arrangement and the architectural design look plausible. There are no signs of duplicated or omitted components, and the spatial relationships between objects seem logical. The image lacks any chromatic irregularities or anatomical implausibilities, suggesting it's likely a photograph of a real space place.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph because there there are no visible signs of artificial manipulation or inconsistencies that would suggest otherwise. The lighting and focus seem natural, with no localized blur or luminance discrepancies. The dog's expression and the table setting appear realistic, without any showing any distorted or duplicated components.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a skierer descending a snowy slope. There are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and focus seem natural, with consistent shadows and depth. The skiker's posture and equipment appear realistic, without any any anatomical implausibilities or functional implausibilities. The background, including the snow and trees, also also texture and color that are are consistent to natural winter scenes. There are no signs of duplicated components or omitted components, and the spatial relationships between the skierer and the environment are well maintained. The image lacks any any chromatic irregularities or abnormal textures, and there there are no illegible letters or awkward facial expressions to suggest it as AI-generated. Overall, the image lacks any any specific artifacts that would indicate it as AI-generated, suggesting it is likely a real photograph.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a horse peeking through a stable window. It shows natural lighting and shadows consistent with an outdoor setting. The horse’s features, including as eyes, nose, and ears, are well-defined and realistic. There are no signs of distortion or unnatural coloration, which would indicate AI generation. The texture of the horse's coat and the stable wall also appear natural, without any the presence of artificial artifacts. The overall composition and perspective are also consistent plausible for a real-life scene.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to depict two giraffss
addCriterionLabel:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to depict a skierier
addCriterionLabel:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a bicycle parked against a fence in an urban setting. There are no visible signs of artificial distortion or anomalies that would suggest the image to be AI-generated. The lighting and shadows seem natural, and there the structural components of the bicycle and the fence appear consistent to be real-world objects. There are no indications of duplicated or omitted components, and the spatial relationships between the objects in the scene seem realistic. The texture of the bicycle and the pavement looks consistent to be real-world wear and tear. There are no illogical interactions or placements of objects that would suggest the image to be AI-generated.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a semi-truck parked outdoors. There are no visible signs of distortion, duplication, or omission that would suggest it is AI-generated. The truck's structure and components are appear consistent with typical semi-trucks, and there the lighting and shadows are natural. The background includes trees and sky, which are look realistic. There are no indications of chromatic irregularities or abnormal textures that would suggest digital manipulation. The overall composition and details of the truck and surroundings seem plausible for a real-world setting.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a natural scene with zebras grazing in a dry, grassy-covered area. There are no signs of lighting discrepancies, structural distortions, or spatial anomalies that would suggest the image as AI-generated. The zebras exhibit normal proportions and their textures consistent with their those of real animals. The image does not exhibit any any any any physical violations of physics or sociocultural implausibilities. Therefore, based on the provided taxonomy, there the image lacks the artifacts that would indicate it as fake.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and focus seem consistent with natural indoor lighting, and the textures of the blanket and the woman’s clothing look realistic. There are no signs of duplicated components, anatomical implausibilities, or other other structural or spatial inconsistencies that would suggest artificial manipulation. The overall composition and details level are appropriate for a photograph taken in a real settingting.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and focus seem consistent throughout the scene, with no signs of localized blur or luminance discrepancies. The structural components like the furniture and the person's clothing look natural without any any duplicated or deformed elements. The spatial relationships between objects, such as the person holding the teddy bear and the table setting items, appear realistic. There are no chromatic irregularities or abnormal textures evident in the objects. The person's facial expression seems natural, and there there are no illogical anatomical or functional implausibilities. The overall composition and details level suggest a real photograph rather than an artificial creation.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image does not exhibit any any the presence of any the aforementioned artifacts. The lighting appears consistent with natural outdoor conditions, and there the objects of in the image, such as the umbrellas and vases, do not exhibit on the presence of any the deformed or duplicated components. The spatial relationships between the objects of in the image seem realistic, and the colors and textures of the objects of in the image appear natural.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a person cross skiing on a snowy landscape. There are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and shadows seem natural, with consistent illumination across the scene. The skierer's posture and equipment appear realistic, without any showing any anatomical implausibilities. The background, including including the trees and mountains, also lack any structural artifacts such as duplicated or omitted components. The overall composition and perspective are are consistent to what would be expected in a real outdoor ski setting.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a motorcycle parked on a city sidewalk. It shows realistic lighting, natural shadows, and no signs of distortion or duplication of components parts. The people in the background seem to be ordinary pedestrians, and there the overall composition and details of the motorcycle and surroundings are consistent to be be real. There are no visible artifacts such as chromatic irregularities, structural deformities, or sociocultural implausibilities that would suggest otherwise.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. There are no signs of luminance discrepancy, localized blur, or structural distortions. The lighting and focus seem consistent natural, and the flowers and vase maintain realistic proportions and textures. The spatial relationships between the objects are also consistent logical, and there there are no chromatic irregularities or anomalies in the texture of the objects. The image does not exhibit show any any any any physical implausibilities or sociocultural implausibilities.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible signs of distortion, duplication, or missing components that would typically indicate artificial generation. The lighting and focus seem consistent with natural photography, and the positioning of the feet on the bed looks plausible. There are no chromatic irregularities or structural deformations that would suggest otherwise. The image does not exhibit physical implausibilities or sociocultural inconsistencies. The texture of the socks and the bedsheet also realistic, and there there are no indications of physics violations.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and focus seem natural, with no signs of localized blur or luminance discrepancy. The baby's expression and the toothbrush are both realistic, without any showing any distorted or duplicated components. The spatial relationship between the baby and the toothbrush is logical, and there there are no indications of abnormal non-spatial relationships. The colors and textures of the baby's skin and the toothbrush are both consistent within normal ranges, and there there are no chromatic irregularities or abnormal textures present. The baby's facial expression is natural, and there there are no awkward or illogical expressions detected. There are no anatomical implausibilities or functional implausibilities evident in the image, and and there there are no physics violations or socioc-cultural implausibilities noted.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph with no evident artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and shadows seem natural, and there the objects and their the environment are well-proportioned and realistic. There are no signs of duplicated components, structural distortions, or illogical spatial relationships. The textures and colors of the objects, such as the cat, the surfboard, and the trash bin, are consistent consistent to the real world. The image does not exhibit any any the presence of physical implausibilities or socioc-cultural implausibilities.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and shadows seem consistent with natural outdoor conditions, and the elephant's trunk and the people's expressions and clothing appear realistic. There are no signs of duplicated components, anatomical implausibilities, or other other structural or spatial inconsistencies that would suggest otherwise. The image captures a plausible interaction between humans and an elephant in what seems to be a zoo or similar setting.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a natural scene with no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. There are no signs of lighting discrepancies, structural distortions, or spatial anomalies that would suggest the image as fake. The giraffe and other the background elements like trees and buildings seem to be in a plausible setting together, without any any any unnatural interactions or placements. The textures of the giraffe’s coat and the grass also the background look realistic, lacking the uniformity or unnatural patterns often seen in AI-generated images.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a close-up of a cooked dish, likely a stir-fry with broccoli and other other vegetables. The lighting seems natural, and there the focus is sharp across the entire plate, showing the texture and details of the food.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a natural scene with a cow grazing in a misty environment. There are no visible signs of artificial manipulation or anomalies that would suggest it is AI-generated. The cow's posture and the grassland setting seem realistic, without any any structural or spatial inconsistencies. The lighting and shadows also appear consistent natural, without any any unrealistic luminance discrepancies or localized blur. The cow's texture and coloration appear consistent normal for a cow, without any any chromatic irregularities or abnormal textures. The cow's anatomy and the surrounding environment lack any anatomical implausibilities or functional implausibilities. The image does not contain any sociocultural implausibilities or other other stylistic artifacts that would indicate it is AI-generated.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real urban street scene with a fire hydrant, potted plants, and a bus in the background. There are no visible artifacts indicating from the provided taxonomy that would suggest the image as AI-generated. The lighting and focus seem consistent natural, with no signs of localized blur or luminance discrepancy. The structural components like the fire hydrant and plants look realistic without any any duplicated or deformed elements. The spatial relationships between the objects in the scene appear logical, and there are no abnormalities in the non of the fire hydrant or the plants. The colors and textures of the objects are consistent with what one would expect in a real-world setting, and there are no chromatic irregularities or abnormal textures. The image does not contain any text or facial elements, so making it impossible to assess for those specific artifacts. Overall, the image lacks the specific artifacts that would suggest it as AI-generated according to the provided taxonomy.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a rodeo event. It captures a dynamic moment with clear details and natural motion. The lighting and focus seem consistent across the entire frame, without any showing signs of localized blur or luminance discrepancy. The structural components like the horse, rider, bull, and surrounding environment appear realistic and there not deformed or duplicated. The spatial relationships between the subjects and their the background are appropriate for a rodeo setting.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a person holding a mobile phone. The lighting and focus seem natural, with no signs of localized blur or luminance discrepancy. The components of the phone, including the keypad and screen, appear consistent to typical design and functionality. There are no duplicated or omitted components, nor are there there any structural artifacts such as distorted limbs or deformed components. The spatial relationship between the phone and the hand is realistic, and there there are no abnormalities in the non physical or functional implausibilities. The texture of the phone and the hand looks appear consistent with real-world materials. The text on the phone's screen is leg readable, and there there are no illegible letters or awkward facial expressions. The image does not violate physics, such as gravity or reflections, and there there are no socioc-cultural implausibilities. The image lacks stylistic artifacts, as the composition and background appear consistent with a real-life setting.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a realistic depiction of a compact kitchen setup, likely within a vehicle or small space.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a person walking down a city sidewalk with two suitcases. There are no visible artifacts indicating that it is AI-generated. The lighting and focus seem consistent with natural urban environments, and there the structural components of the person and surroundings look realistic. The spatial relationships between the person, suitcases, and background elements appear logical. The colors and textures of the person's clothing and the environment are not unnatural. There are no signs of duplicated or omitted components, and the overall composition suggests a candid moment captured in a real-world setting.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph because there there are no visible artifacts indicating the provided taxonomy. The traffic lights, signboard, and surrounding environment look natural with realistic lighting and shadows. There are no signs of duplicated components, structural deformities, or chromatic irregularities. The text on the signboard is legible, and the spatial relationships between the objects seem plausible. The image lacks any any the presence of physics violations or sociocultural implausibilities.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a photograph of a bagel with visible texture and natural lighting, which aligns with realistic characteristics. There are no signs of chromatic irregularities, structural distortions, or spatial anomalies that would suggest it is AI-generated. The bagel's appearance, including its the lighting and focus, seems consistent to be be consistent natural and consistent consistent to be be seen in real-world photography. The image lacks the artifacts typically associated with AI-generated images, such as unnatural colors, deformed components, or illogical spatial relationships.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating that it was AI-generated. The objects are placed in a natural and logical manner, with consistent lighting and shadows. The textures of the apple, orange, and onion look realistic, and the fork is positioned correctly relative to the fruits. There are no signs of chromatic irregularities or structural deformations. The spatial relationships between the objects are are also also the fork are also also the expected, and there there are no indications of physics violations or sociocultural implausibilities.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of an elephant in what seems to be a zoo or wildlife enclosure. There are no visible signs of artificial lighting discrepancies, structural distortions, or chromatic irregularities that would suggest it is AI-generated. The elephant's texture and the surrounding environment look natural, with no indications of duplicated components or missing elements. The spatial relationships between the elephant and its the fence and vegetation seem plausible, and there there are no anatomical implausibilities or functional implausibilities evident. The image does not exhibit violations of physics, such as incorrect shadows or reflections, which could be indicative of AI generation. The overall composition and details in the image align with what one would expect from a real photograph.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a train at station platform.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and shadows seem consistent with natural outdoor conditions, and the car and surrounding environment look well-composed.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to depict a crowd of people holding umbrellas, with one person prominently holding a Union Jack flag. There are no visible signs of artificial lighting discrepancies, structural distortions, or unusual spatial relationships between objects. The image seems to capture realistic human expressions and textures, and there the overall composition suggests a natural, unaltered scene. Therefore, based on the provided taxonomy, this image does not exhibit exhibit any the presence of any the aforementioned artifacts, indicating it is likely real.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a realistic depiction of a historical room or meeting room, likely from a ship or a similar setting. The lighting is consistent with natural indoor illumination, and there the objects textures and details are well-rendered, showing no signs of distortion or unnatural coloration. The spatial arrangement of furniture and decor is logical, and the overall composition lacks any the typical artifacts associated with AI-generated images, such as luminance discrepancies, structural deformities, or sociocultural implausibilities.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a natural scene with no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. There are no signs of localized blur, chromatic irregularities, or structural deformations. The lighting and shadows seem consistent with a real-world setting, and there the swan and the surrounding environment, there there are no indications of physics violations or sociocultural implausibilities. The image captures a realistic interaction between the swan and its the snowy landscape, without any any any obvious anomalies in the spatial relationships or textures.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a realistic depiction of a prison cell. It shows a bed, a desk with a chair, and a window with bars, all of which are are consistent with typical prison cell furnishings. There are no signs of distortion, duplication, or omission of components that suggest the image is real. The lighting and shadows seem natural, and there the spatial relationships between objects are plausible. The textures of the walls and floor also appear authentic, and there the overall composition lacks any the artifacts typically associated with AI-generated images artifacts.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and focus seem consistent with natural conditions, and the motorcycle and rider are positioned realistically within the scene. There are no signs of structural distortions, chromatic irregularities, or other physical implausibilities. The rider's posture and the motorcycle's design are both plausible for a real-life scenario.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a photograph of two stacked coffee cups with a realistic texture and lighting. There are no signs of chromatic irregularities, structural distortions, or spatial anomalies that would suggest it is AI-generated. The image captures a common scenario with natural lighting and shadows, which aligns with what one might expect in a real-world setting.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a bus. It shows clear details of the vehicle, including its the lighting and shadows seem natural for outdoor conditions. There are no signs of distortion or duplication of components, which would be indicative of AI generation. The bus is positioned realistically within its the context of a street setting, with no unusual spatial relationships or missing parts of the scene. The text on the bus is legible, and there the overall texture of the bus and surroundings looks consistentistent realistic. There are no indications of physics violations or sociocultural implausibilities that would suggest the image is fake.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts from the provided taxonomy. The lighting and focus seem consistent with a real photograph, and the skateboarder's posture and the texture of the clothing and shoes look natural. There are no signs of distortion, duplication, or missing components that would suggest an artificial origin. The spatial relationship between the skateboarder and the background also also the rest of the scene appears plausible, and the colors and textures of the materials are well within realistic ranges.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a baseball game. There are no visible artifacts indicating that it is AI-generated. The players and theirs textures look natural, with no signs of chromatic irregularities or abnormal surface textures. The lighting and shadows seem consistent, and there the spatial relationships between the players and the field are logical. The image does not exhibit any anatomical implausibilities or functional implausibilities. The overall composition and details levels suggest a real-life sports event.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to depict a realistic scene with natural lighting and no visible distortions or anomalies. The surfer and the surrounding environment, including as trees and people watching
addCriterion:Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and shadows seem consistent with natural outdoor conditions, and the person's posture and the skateboard's position suggest realistic movement. There are no signs of duplicated components, structural distortions, or chromatic irregularities. The spatial relationships between the person, skateboard, and background elements like trees and road signs also appear logical. The person's facial expression and body proportions look natural, and there there are no indications of anatomical implausibilities or functional implausibilities. The image does not violate physics, such as gravity or reflections, which would be evident if it were fake. There are no sociocultural implausibilities present, and the overall composition and style do not suggest stylistic inconsistencies.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of an aircraft in flight. It lacks the structural, spatial, and textural artifacts typically associated with AI-generated images artifacts. There are no signs of distorted components, duplicated parts, or chromatic irregularities. The lighting and focus seem consistent, with no localized blur or luminance discrepancy. The aircraft is depicted in a realistic manner, with proper proportions and textures. The sky background is consistent with natural cloud formations, and there the landing gear is correctly deployed for approach. Therefore, based on the provided taxonomy, this image does not exhibit the characteristics of an AI-generated image.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of an elephant in a natural setting. The lighting and shadows seem consistent with outdoor conditions, and there the elephant's posture and texture are realistic. There are no signs of distortion, duplication, or missing components that would suggest it as AI-generated. The spatial relationship between the elephant and its the surrounding environment also appear natural, and there the overall composition lacks any the inconsistencies that would be indicative of artificial generation.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of an airport tarmac with Air Canada aircraft parked at gates. There are no visible artifacts indicating that the image is AI-generated. The lighting and focus seem consistent with natural daylight, and there the planes and vehicles are positioned realistically within the context of an airport. There are no signs of chromatic irregularities, structural distortions, or other spatial anomalies. The text on the aircraft is legible, and the overall composition lacks any stylistic inconsistencies. The image does not exhibit violations of physics or sociocultural implausibilities.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a workspace setup with multiple monitors, a laptop, and various office supplies like a keyboard, mouse, and beverages. The lighting seems natural, and there the objects and textures look consistent with typical office equipment. There are no signs of chromatic irregularities, structural distortions, or spatial anomalies that would suggest it as AI-generated. The arrangement of the items and their the overall composition seem plausible for a real-life setting.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and focus seem consistent with natural conditions, and the players' movements and expressions appear realistic. There are no signs of duplicated components, structural distortions, or chromatic irregularities. The spatial relationships between the players and their the background also seem appropriate, and the tennis ball's trajectory looks plausible for a real-life scenario. The image lacks any the stylistic inconsistencies or out the out frame issues that would typically indicate an AI-generated image.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a cat sitting on what looks like a car seat. There are no visible signs of artificial artifacts such as unnatural lighting, distorted components, or unusual spatial relationships. The cat's fur texture and the seat's material both seem natural and consistent with real-world observations. The lighting is consistent, and there the shadows are realistic, suggesting the image lacks the inconsistencies typically associated with AI-generated images artifacts.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be a real photograph of a ski jump event. The lighting and shadows seem consistent with natural sunlight, and there the skiers's movements and the snowboarder's jumps are realistic. There are no signs of chromatic irregularities or structural distortions. The Toyota logo is clear and leg the text is legable. The overall composition and perspective are plausible for a sports event.Label:Real |
|
1 | Reason: The image appears to be real because there there are no visible artifacts indicating it as AI-generated. The lighting and shadows seem natural, with no signs of luminance discrepancy or impractical brightness. The individuals and objects in the scene are positioned logically, and their there are no duplicated components or spatial anomalies. The don texture of the don objects and the don skin of the person appear consistent normal, without any any any unnatural colors or textures. The text on the box is leg readable, and the facial expression of the person looks natural. There are no anatomical implausibilities or functional implausibilities noted the image.Label:Real |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 54