Datasets:

haritzpuerto

/

the_pile_00_OpenWebText2

like 0

Article content Human behavior has a tremendous impact on investing — more so than most realize — and one of our biggest weaknesses is the tendency to constantly compare and contrast ourselves to others. [np_storybar title=”Follow Financial Post” link=””] We apologize, but this video has failed to load. tap here to see other videos from our team. Try refreshing your browser, or Three signs bubbles are brewing again in the market — and one of them has wheels Back to video • Twitter • Facebook [/np_storybar] For example, a 1995 study by the Harvard School of Public Health indicated that people will forgo a stronger income scenario in favour of a weaker one as long as it meant earning more than their neighbours. Unfortunately, many in the investment world are keenly aware of this and will structure their marketing efforts accordingly. As a result, you have a compounding of momentum or trends in the market as investors buy at or near market tops for fear of not doing as well as or better than others. For the same reason, investors piled into technology stocks in 2000 with only the promise of earnings in some distant future, and into housing-related investments in 2007 that were backstopped by very low incomes.

Monday's are never fun...except when it's West Ham Q&A day and that's exactly what it is today! To say there is a lot going on in the world of West Ham wouldn't quite be true as, in all honesty, its been fairly quiet. Last week, there was transfer movement on a couple of fronts and the club also sealed the free transfer of Ryan Fredericks from Fulham on a four-year deal. There is still little to no progress on moves for Felipe Anderson and Marlon Santos, while the Hammers were also dealt a disastrous injury blow in Barcelona. In training with Argentina, Manuel Lanzini ruptured his anterior cruciate ligament in his right knee and football.london understands that it's a whole lot worse than first feared and the attacking midfielder could miss the entire 2018/19 season in a worse case scenario. That will no doubt impact on Manuel Pellegrini's transfer plans for the remainder of the window, with any moves now unlikely to happen until after the World Cup. (Image: FILIPPO MONTEFORTE/AFP/Getty Images) We also had news from the continent on Monday about where West Ham are set to be based for ten days of their pre-season tour this summer, more of which you will find out about later in the live blog. So, sit back, relax and enjoy our weekly Q&A with Hammers wrtier Sam Inkersole, where he will answer questions posed to him on his Twitter account, which you can follow @Sam_InkersoleTM Keep up to date with the latest news, features and exclusives from football.london via the freefootball.london app for iPhone and Android. Available to download from the App Store and Google Play.

Benjamin Lok describes how the robot butt sensors work 2:26 Prostate exams are potentially-life saving. But the process of getting one can be nerve-racking — both for the doctor and the patient. A group of scientists from Drexel University and the Universities of Wisconsin and Florida are hoping to assist with that. They've designed a robot to help medical students give better prostate exams. The robot's name is "Patrick" and he's an interactive butt. Professor Benjamin Lok "Patrick is part of a simulation where students get to practice prostate exams," lead researcher and University of Florida professor Benjamin Lok explains to As It Happens guest host Tom Harrington. "The simulator itself is a piece of plastic and around the anus area is a foam, rubbery material. It's anatomically correct, and inside, they have placed a prostate so that they can actually feel what a prostate would feel like." But the physical examination is actually the last part of the training process. Initially, students start using the simulator to work on their beside manner. "Students have to talk to Patrick for about five to eight minutes," the University of Florida professor says. "They work on their social skills. They try to obtain a patient history, but also have to work through anxiety that Patrick's having." A student interacting with "Patrick" (Courtesy of Andrew Robb, University of Florida) As the interview progresses — and the student realizes that Patrick needs a prostate exam — Patrick becomes quite hesitant to proceed. Lok says the robot will say, "Do you really have to do this? I don't understand why we have to do this right now." Once Patrick is convinced, the student begins the examination. "We can show you in real-time, as you're doing the exam... whether you're pressing all the regions and if you're pressing with enough pressure," Lok continues. The sensor displays traffic light-style signals of green, yellow or red depending on the appropriate pressure applied. "That helps educate the user and what a good prostate exam should feel like," he says. But why not have Patrick yell or respond in a more human-like way? Lok says they thought about doing this, but for freshmen medical students, that would increase the level of anxiety. "We want the system to provide positive experiences, where they can get good feedback but also help reduce some of the anxiety before they first practice on what are often called standardized patients, which are called actors." Many medical schools pay professional actors who are specially trained to receive numerous prostate exams by students. However, as you might imagine, there are a limited number of actors willing to do this. Postate exam program, "Patrick" (Courtesy of Andrew Robb, University of Florida) Like a pilot who practices in a simulator before actually flying a plane, Lok hopes Patrick will serve the same purpose for medical students. "You can make mistakes with Patrick and start over, that's one of the advantages of a simulator." Patrick is currently being used by medical students at the University of Florida and Drexel University. Lok hopes the technology will be used in more medical schools across the United States.

A&E’s hit reality TV show was ensnared in controversy after its star’s controversial comments about gays and African-Americans A record-setting reality show appears to be paddling in the wrong direction as its fifth season gets underway. Citing data from Nielsen, Variety reports that just 6.65 million viewers watched Wednesday night’s episode of Duck Dynasty on A&E. That’s down from the 8.5 million who tuned into last week’s season premiere. The ratings are the lowest for an original episode of the show since December 2012. Duck was ensnared in controversy late last year when star Phil Robertson made derogatory remarks about gays and African Americans. The show focuses on a family that made a fortune on duck-hunting accessories. Its fourth-season premiere was the most-watched cable reality TV episode in history, attracting 11.77 million viewers. Last year, it was the second most watched cable TV program overall, after AMC’s Walking Dead. [Variety]

But something is happening here and you don’t know what it is Do you, Mr, Jones? (Bob Dylan, 1965) Rulers seldom know what’s happening, do they? They have the intelligence apparatus and their party politicos feeding them whatever the powerful like to hear, but the assessment of the people can be in delicious discord. Atal Bihari Vajpayee ordered elections early because his India was shining. He paid the price. Through cries of policy paralysis and corruption, Manmohan Singh went in expecting to be reasonably rewarded. After all, his government had delivered a nearly 7-8% (9-10% by today’s yardstick) rate of growth over most of his ten-year period, unprecedented for a democracy. Yet, the result was a shock. What was common between the two governments – covering a period of about 16 years of elite section boy-scout optimism – was bubbly talk for much of the time by economists, policy wonks, and the World Bank and the IMF. In the end, the politics probably turned on a less talked about variable: jobless growth, which analysts hadn’t troubled themselves with. In the strapped situation of lukewarm private sector investment we are in today, and the major employment-generating informal economy sector having taken a hit since demonetisation, no analyst or political planner can afford to overlook jobless growth. Pakora growth, a close enough synonym, staring the country in the face is hardly a pleasing outcome after four years of “game-changing” economics, no matter how combatively BJP chief Amit Shah defended it in his maiden speech in the Rajya Sabha. Young Indians of any class, on whose shoulders rides the much-vaunted promise of the demographic dividend, are not amused. Rampant joblessness is a feature the Modi sarkar shares with the governments of Vajpayee and Singh. Alas, what it does not share with their time in office is a long patch of striking expansion of the economy. Also Read Not to put too fine a point on it, we now find ourselves stuck in a time of creeping pessimism, although international capital has done its best to talk up the India story through friendly statements issued by the IMF and the World Bank that the Modi regimes perversely quotes all the time, though it only has to look around to find the truth. What’s worse, India is slipping when the US and Europe have recovered and when the international price of oil is still in benign territory. The dim economic outlook is likely to impose a cut-and-run political strategy on the prime minister, although MPs in general, not just of the ruling party, do not like their term cut short. For Modi, an early election is, therefore, likely to be a political compulsion. In this respect, his story is different from that of Vajpayee’s. The latter had chosen to go to the country early of his own volition in order to seize what his advisors thought might be a bright moment. The contrast in circumstances Modi finds himself in has been accentuated by the morale-sapping defeat in the recent by-elections in Rajasthan. Ordinarily, losing by-elections is not the end of the world, although ruling parties frequently coast to easy victories in them. However, the BJP lost every one of the 16 Assembly segments that make up the Lok Sabha constituencies of Alwar and Ajmer. That is a lot of territory to lose in one go and should be a distinct worry for the saffron party. Rajasthan has an old and active RSS network, which in recent times was lubricated through political and social actions of the Hindutva variety, most notably cow vigilante actions. But none of this counted with the voter. The “secular” realm – jobs, prices, the economy, living conditions – trumped the world of perverse ideas delivered slickly through clever propaganda disseminated not just by fanatical Hindutva outfits but also a section of the fawning media. Assembly elections in Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Chhatisgarh are due in December this year and the Lok Sabha poll should in the normal course be held in April-May, 2019. However, when the prognosis for the BJP in these states is none too bright – and remember the bad news began to pour in from Modi’s the home state Gujarat, where BJP’s win was so tenuous that the party cannot even celebrate it – and the Rajasthan results hammered home a bitter truth, can the prime minister risk holding the Lok Sabha election after a potentially weak showing in three BJP-ruled states? This will be the singular consideration guiding the prime minister if he decides to go to the country early, not some high-intentioned thinking on the presumed benefits to the country of holding parliament and state polls simultaneously. The year 2017 began brilliantly for Modi and Amit Shah with a staggering win in Uttar Pradesh. But the year ended on a sobering note on account of the factors that became evident first in Gujarat and then in Rajasthan – rampant joblessness, farmers’ plight, the woes of the working classes in the ‘rurban’ areas and in cities proper. If a week is a long time in politics, a year is an eternity. Anand K. Sahay is a journalist who lives and works in New Delhi.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) will clinch victory in the first-in-the-nation primary in New Hampshire, according to a CNN projection, powered by his strength among blue-collar, younger and more liberal voters.

Following the airport shooting, Steube doubled down on his view that license holders ought to bring guns into venues like airports, claiming that gun-free zones are more likely to be targeted by shooters. In fact, most major airports are not gun-free zones, as they have armed and unarmed security personnel. In addition, several studies show the vast majority of mass shootings do not occur in gun-free zones. In his book, "Rampage Nation," Louis Klarevas of the University of Massachusetts found that 93 of 111 mass shootings from 1966 to 2015 occurred in zones in which guns were not prohibited.

Adventure Time, Mission Impossible, The A-Team, Harry Potter and the new Ghostbusters are about to land on LEGO Dimensions. Images of the new additions were picked up by users on /r/LEGO, the source of which seems to be early listings on the Mexican version of Amazon. This pretty much breaks the street date of a LEGO Dimensions announcement which is supposed to happen today (June 9th). The game already features characters, locations, items and more from popular franchises such as DC Comics, Back To The Future and Scooby-Doo. Adventure Time was already slated to be a LEGO Ideas official set, so it’s appearance on the subreddit wasn’t such a shock. Mission Impossible and The A-Team, on the other hand, are a complete surprise here. That being said, we still really like these new additions and would love to play them… if it wasn’t for the fact that the game, in any iteration, has still not been released in South Africa. It was initially released north of the equator on September 27th, so local interested parties have been waiting for it for quite sometime. Hopefully it’ll arrive here soon. We can dream… UPDATE 09/06: Thanks to an official trailer made for E3, we now know that the above leaks are all official. To make the news even better (and to empty your wallet even more), E.T., The Goonies, Gremlins, Teen Titans GO!, Knight Rider and even Sonic will be appearing in the game at a future date. [Source – /r/ LEGO

NEW YORK (CBSNewYork) — A fight between two roommates inside a homeless shelter in Harlem turned deadly Friday morning. It happened inside a shelter for men with alcohol, drug and mental health problems at 149 W. 132nd St., which is run by the nonprofit Bowery Residents Committee. Police said the two men got into a dispute in their fifth-floor apartment using kitchen knives, CBS2’s Brian Conybeare reported. Police say the two roommates pulled out kitchen knives during a dipute. A 44-year-old was killed, and a 39-year-old was critically injured. No charges had been filed as of Friday evening. A shelter resident, who did not want to give his name, said he heard the fight just after 7 a.m. and that it sounded like somebody fell out of bed. “I heard something go boom,” the man said, adding that he does not feel safe in the shelter. Neighbors told CBS2 the block is home to at least three different homeless shelters, and some say the shelter where the incident happened is a constant source of trouble. “Anytime there’s an ambulance, a fire engine or a police car, we are worried that something happened, and unfortunately now something really bad happened, and that’s scary,” said Francesco Fabba, who has lived on the block since 2009. He pointed to empty liquor bottles littering the sidewalk as evidence of the ongoing trouble and fear shelter residents cause. “We try to cope as much as we can with that,” Fabba said. “Maybe you try to walk on this side of the street and not that side, depends on who’s outside the building,” he added. Others on the gentrifying street, which includes million-dollar brownstones, say the shelter residents don’t frighten them, that they’re just regular people struggling with mental health issues and trying to get some help. “Most of them are very kind to me,” said neighbor Moneke Coates. “I’ve never felt threatened.” Coates said the shelter was there long before a new wave of wealthier people moved in. “It’s just that they want them out of here,” she said. “It doesn’t look good for them.” Community activist Iesha Sekou understands both sides, but said the city needs more affordable housing and the homeless system needs to do more screening. “Mental illness has to definitely be addressed before people are going into shelters,” Sekou said. “We have to assess whether or not there is a danger to other people.” The Bowery Residents Committee would not go on camera. In an email statement to CBS2, the organization said that it is saddened by what happened.

Over every mountain there is a path, although it may not be seen from the valley I'm now taking commissions, if you're interested in some high quality terrain PM me. WorldPainter (for creating the map) Chunky (for rendering the map) Thanks for stopping by, if you enjoyed this submission please consider leaving a diamond! The sweeping sunset of the Roughhew Rocks is deceiving. The mountain becomes beautiful, the forests become picturesque and the rugged rocks look tamed. Even the birds sing a loud song heard far and wide over the coastal rocks. Don't be fooled, you're not safe. The beauty is the danger, one feels so safe, so alive, so free in Roughhew. But the same cannot be said for the human. Only two people have escaped Roughhew alive, and the thousands that are enticed here each season are slain. Some say it is nature that kills them, others say it's haunted, some claim the beauty was too much for them. While nobody knows the cause of death of these people there is one thing that cannot be disputed - this region has the highest rate of death in all the land.I like this map but I found it incredibly difficult to get nice renders of it. As such it marks the first map I've made where the cover photo is from the ground rather than a top down isometric view. This map I changed normal smooth stone for rock, a combination of stone and cobblestone, to create a rougher and more rugged terrain and I'm pleased with how it turned out. I also used gravel in the valleys to show heavy erosion and an unstable land, despite the towering mountain looming over it.I used the following tools to create this map:

HONG KONG — July 4th may be a holiday for Americans, but in China it is the eve of nationwide release of “Man Of Tai Chi,” the feature directing debut of Keanu Reeves. That’s a big deal for the Canadian star and part of a giant screen success story for China. In addition to the film’s July 5 release in an initial 1,600 conventional digital theaters, “Man Of Tai Chi” has also been re-mastered to a large screen format with IMAX DMR technology. IMAX insiders report that the picture has no edits or narrative differences from the conventional version, other than by now standard reworked image and sound enhancements. The film is one of the first Chinese-language movies (it is actually in Mandarin, Cantonese and English) to be made in China by a North American and is a genuine made-in-China co-venture involving China Film Group, Wanda Media, Village Roadshow Pictures Asia, and Universal Pictures. The contemporary action-drama was shot in Beijing and Hong Kong and is described as “the spiritual journey of a young martial artist,” who is lured into the dark world of underground combat with promises of money, glamour and power. It has also been getting a lot of heat as the star has put in thousands of air miles touring the major cities of the Middle Kingdom and doing promo work at the recent Beijing, Shanghai and Cannes festivals. The giant screen brand has been popular with China’s status-obsessed new middle classes. Chinese audiences are willing to pay hefty premium prices for the giant screen and amped up sound systems. So popular that more movies are being made or converted for the format and that earlier this year IMAX quietly dropped its previous policy of just showing a single title on each screen. “Man of Tai Chi” will have to compete for screen space with “Man of Steel,” and by Variety’s count it appears to be getting play at some 116 venues in its opening frame. Chinese, and to a lesser extent Korean, producers have been the keenest non-Hollywood film-makers to embrace IMAX presentation and in Sept 2012 leading local studio Huayi Brothers pacted with IMAX to deliver a minimum of seven future movies in IMAX format. More than half a dozen Chinese films have been made or converted into IMAX, four flowing from Huayi; the Feng Xiaogang-directed “Aftershock” and “1942,” and the Stephen Fung comedy action pair “Tai Chi Zero” and “Tai Chi Hero.” Other studios have also jumped in: CFG with “The Great Revival;” Bona Film Group with Tsui Hark’s “Flying Swords of Dragon Gate;” and the Jackie Chan production-starring vehicle “CZ12,” which Huayi released. IMAX is a huge commercial success story in China. As of March this year, the company had 110 screens in operation in China, compared with just 10 in 2010. That makes China IMAX’s second biggest territory behind the US and its top international location. China has witnessed some of the most gargantuan orders for new screens. While cinema chains in other territories have ordered IMAX screens in ones and twos, Dalian Wanda in March 2011 put in an order for 75 screens. In Nov 2012 South Korea’s CGV booked 15 IMAX screens for its expanding Chinese theater circuit. With some 120-plus giant screens committed or under construction in China, IMAX has branch offices in both Beijing and Shanghai and last year launched a dedicated Chinese-language website. (Clifford Coonan in Beijing also contributed to this story.)

South Africa’s top financial institutions have recommend in a new report that whistle-blowing be rewarded in an environment of growing corruption and mismanagement. The 2018 Financial Markets Review, published by the South African Reserve Bank (SARB), in conjunction with Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA), noted that international cases of misconduct in wholesale financial markets have focused the attention of regulators and market participants on measures to strengthen standards of market practice; and increase the accountability of financial institutions and individuals for the ethos and conduct of business. “Following the global financial crisis of 2007–08, it was observed that senior executives and senior managers in many financial intuitions had a laissez-faire attitude towards corporate governance principles and risk culture within their institutions,” the Reserve Bank said. “The international focus on strengthening codes and standards in light of misconduct scandals means that South Africa cannot afford to be complacent,” it said. As a result, South Africa’s financial sector authorities – National Treasury, the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) and the FSCA established the Financial Markets Review Committee (FMRC) to develop recommendations to reinforce conduct standards in wholesale financial markets. The report would focus on specific tools to strengthen the implementation and governance of conduct standards by market participants; and areas where changes to financial markets legislation and associated subordinate legislation are required to support a new conduct framework. Recommendations by Treasury in the Financial Markets Review, include, among other things, that regulators consider implementing a programme that rewards whistle-blowers for providing information about substantial misconduct in financial markets that leads to a successful enforcement action with monetary sanctions. The report noted that in more opaque markets, whistle-blowers who inform regulators of suspected instances of misconduct can be a vital source of information to support regulation against misconduct. “Market regulators can incentivise market participants to provide such information by ensuring that necessary protections are in place so that no retaliation is taken against a whistle-blower for disclosure of information and, in certain circumstances, monetary rewards are provided,” it said. In the UK, the report highlighted that banks, building societies, large investment firms and insurers are required to establish and maintain an independent whistle-blowing channel through which staff may make disclosures. These firms are also required to appoint a senior individual as a whistle-blowers’ champion to ensure the effectiveness of the whistle-blowing arrangements. In the US, the Securities and Exchanges Commission (SEC) has established a whistle-blower programme in terms of which the SEC is authorised to pay an award of between 10% and 30% of amounts collected if an eligible whistle-blower voluntarily provides original information that leads to a successful enforcement action with monetary sanctions exceeding $1 million. In terms of whistle-blower protection, under the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act), “no employer may discharge, demote, suspend, threaten or harass, directly or indirectly, or in any other manner discriminate against, a whistle-blower in the terms and conditions of employment because of any lawful act done by the whistle-blower”. An individual may bring a private right of action in federal court against his/her employer for such retaliation. In addition, the SEC may bring an enforcement action against a company for violation of these anti-retaliation provisions, the report stated. In South Africa, Treasury pointed out that whistle-blowers are protected by legislation. “The Protected Disclosures Act 26 of 2000 makes provision for employees to report unlawful or irregular conduct by employers and fellow employees while providing protection for employees who blow the whistle.” “The Act provides such protection for any disclosure made in good faith by an employee who reasonably believes that the information disclosed, and any allegation contained in it, is substantially true, and who does not make the disclosure for purposes of personal gain, excluding any reward payable in terms of any law.” Read: The 10 biggest complaints on SA’s anti-corruption hotline

The Indian supermarket will add 4,000 square feet to its current space. View Full Caption DNAinfo/Katie Honan JACKSON HEIGHTS — Indian grocery store Patel Brothers is planning a renovation and expansion at its 74th Street location that will feature a larger produce section and wider aisles, according to its manager. The 7,000-square-foot store, which opened at 37-27 74th St. in 1984, will grow by another 4,000 square feet by taking over the former Mumbai Grill next door, manager Dapash Patel said. The owners wanted to create more space in the busy supermarket, which is known for its authentic Indian groceries, spices and imported food. "This is too small," Patel said. "It's getting a little crowded." The expansion should be finished in August, and will create wider aisles and a larger produce department and frozen food aisle, according to Patel. The store will stay open during construction, and its existing space will also be renovated once the expansion is complete, he said. The Patel brothers opened their first supermarket in 1974 in Chicago, and now have 53 locations across the country.

At our best, we motivate ourselves every day to get dressed and go to work or school. Although there are larger incentives at work, it's our own volition that powers us through our innumerable daily tasks. If we could learn to control the motivational centers of our brains that drive volition, would it lead us toward healthier, more productive lives? Using a new brain imaging strategy, Duke University scientists have now taken a first step in understanding how to manipulate specific neural circuits using thoughts and imagery. The technique, which is described in the March 16 issue of the journal Neuron, is part of a larger approach called 'neurofeedback,' which gives participants a dynamic readout of brain activity, in this case from a brain area critical for motivation. "These methods show a direct route for manipulating brain networks centrally involved in healthy brain function and daily behavior," said the study's senior investigator R. Alison Adcock, an assistant professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences and associate director of the Center for Cognitive Neuroscience in the Duke University Institute for Brain Sciences. Neurofeedback is a specialized form of biofeedback, a technique that allows people to monitor aspects of their own physiology, such as heart rate and skin temperature. It can help generate strategies to overcome anxiety and stress or to cope with other medical conditions. Neurofeedback has historically relied on electroencephalography or EEG, in which patterns of electrical activity are monitored noninvasively by electrodes attached to the scalp. But these measures provide only rough estimates of where activity occurs in the brain. advertisement In contrast, the new study employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which measures changes in blood oxygen levels, allowing more precisely localized measurements of brain activity. Adcock's team has been working on ways to use thoughts and behavior to tune brain function for the past eight years. In this time, they've developed tools allowing them to analyze complex brain imaging data in real time and to display it to participants as neurofeedback while they are in the fMRI scanner. This study focused on the ventral tegmental area (VTA), a small area deep within the brain that is a major source of dopamine, a neurochemical well known for its role in motivation, experiencing rewards, learning, and memory. According to Adcock's previous research, when people are given incentives to remember specific images, an increase in VTA activation before the image appears predicts whether the participants are going to successfully remember the image. External incentives like money work well to stimulate the VTA, but it was unclear whether people could exercise this area on their own, said co-author Jeff MacInnes, a postdoctoral researcher in Adcock's lab. advertisement In the new study, the team encouraged participants in the scanner to generate feelings of motivation -- using their own personal strategies -- during 20-second intervals. They weren't able to raise their VTA activity consistently on their own. But when the scientists provided participants with neurofeedback from the VTA, presented in the form of a fluctuating thermometer, participants were able to learn which strategies worked, and ultimately adopt more effective strategies. Compared to control groups, the neurofeedback-trained participants successfully elevated their VTA activity. Participants reported using a variety of different motivational strategies, from imagining parents or coaches encouraging them, to playing out hypothetical scenarios in which their efforts were rewarded, said co-author Kathryn Dickerson, a postdoctoral researcher in Adcock's group. The self-generated boost in VTA activation worked even after the thermometer display was removed. Only the participants who had received accurate neurofeedback were able to consistently raise their VTA levels. "Because this is the first demonstration of its kind, there is much still to be understood," Adcock added. "But these tools could offer benefits for everyone, particularly those with depression or attention problems." The neurofeedback training also activated other regions involved in learning and experiencing rewards, confirming that, at least in the short term, the brain changes its activity more broadly as a result of neurofeedback, Dickerson said. Adcock said one caveat of the study is that the team has not tested whether the neurofeedback drove changes in behavior. The group is working on those studies now and also plans to conduct the same study in participants with depression and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This research was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (MH9743, MH100764), the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Esther A. & Joseph Klingenstein Fund, and the Dana Foundation.

Slapp straff, men mister lappen Ungdommene som ble tatt i hasjaksjonene i Fana la alle kortene på bordet. Cannabisbruken de innrømmet i avhør, brukes nå til å ta fra dem lappen. Publisert Publisert 16. august 2014 LA KORTENE PÅ BORDET: Dette er noen av bildene politiet fant på mobiltelefonene til dem som ble pågrepet i cannabisaksjonene. Bildet i midten er fra et beslag politiet gjorde i forkant av aksjonene. Foto: POLITIET Denne artikkelen er over seks år gammel Flere av ungdommene som ble tatt i hasjaksjonene i Bergen sør i februar i år har mistet retten til å føre motorvogn. Det skjer etter at det i midten av juni i år dumpet et brev ned i postkassen til flere av dem. — I avhør skal De ha opplyst at De har røyket marihuana, omtrent annenhver helg, i forbindelse med fest. (...) Det at De har brukt marihuana over en lengre periode, fra 2013 til 2014, vitner om at deres bruk ikke er forenlig med å inneha førerretten til motorvogn. På denne bakgrunn har politiet skjellig grunn til å tro at De har et rusproblem og således ikke fyller kravene til helse som kreves for å inneha retten til å føre førerkortpliktig motorvogn, står det i ett av brevene fra Fellesforvaltningsenheten til Hordaland politidistrikt. Det skal være et titall ungdommer som nå har mistet sertifikatet. Flere av dem har hyret inn advokat for å bestride saken. - Ingen heksejakt Det er også flere som har ønsket å kjøre opp til lappen, som ikke får lov av førerkortkontoret. Også det er en følge av cannabisbruken de har innrømmet i avhør. Ifølge Morten Ørn, stasjonssjef ved Bergen Sør politistasjon, er det ikke snakk om noen koordinert aksjon for å frata dem som ble pågrepet førerkortet. — Det er en administrativ sak som går parallelt med Tidlig ute-prosjektet, sier han. De fleste av ungdommene som ble pågrepet, fikk påtaleunnlatelse mot at de gjennomførte det forebyggende programmet. Tre ganger på to år Jurist Kirsti Fürstenberg ved Forvaltningsavdelingen sier de tar utgangspunkt i håndhevingsinstruksen fra Politidirektoratet og en dom fra Borgarting lagmannsrett når de avgjør om en person skal miste førerretten som følge av en bekymringsmelding. — Så gjøres det en skjønnsmessig helhetsvurdering i hvert tilfelle. Vi går konkret inn i hvert tilfelle og ser gjennom dokumentene vi har. I dommen fra lagmannsretten, som legges til grunn for tilbakekallelsen av førerretten, står det at én overtredelse i året ikke er tilstrekkelig for å tibakekallelse. «To kan være det men formuleringen flere tyder på at det må være minst tre overtredelser i løpet av siste par år», står det i dommernes tolkning av Vegtrafikkloven. Tar ikke hensyn til lovlighet Før ungdommene mistet lappen, fikk de et forhåndsvarsel fra Forvaltningsenheten. Deretter fikk de 14 dager på seg med å komme med informasjon de mener er relevant for saken. — Det er mange som kommer med uttalelser. Det inngår som en del av sakens dokumenter, og blir en del av helhetsvurderingen, sier Fürstenberg, som igjen understreker at det gjøres en skjønnsmessig vurdering i hvert tilfelle, og at hun uttaler seg på generelt grunnlag. Forvaltningsenheten tar ikke hensyn til lovligheten av rusmiddelet som benyttes, når det gjelder vurderingen av edruelighet. — Vi ser på en konkret helhetsvurdering av ruseffekten, sier Fürstenberg. Alkohol = narkotika I prinsippet kan dermed alkoholbruk og narkotikabruk dermed behandles likt med tanke på om man får beholde førerkortet. — Det vi må vurdere er om bruken tilsier en økt risiko i trafikken. For å få sertifikatet tilbake, må ungdommene vise til dokumentert rusfrihet i ett år. — Det blir en konkret vurdering i hvert tilfelle, men de må sannsynliggjøre edruelighet. Det er opp til personen selv og skaffe bevis for dette, gjerne fra lege, sier hun. Økning i førerkortbeslag Fra 1. januar til 5. august i år, har politiet i Hordaland fattet 644 vedtak om tilbakekallelse av førerretten. 550 av disse vedtakene kommer som følge av vedtak fattet av fylkesmannen, mens 94 av dem er på bakgrunn av saker politiet selv har initiert. Samme periode i fjor, var det totalt 578 vedtak, og bare 34 av dem kom på bakgrunn av saker politiet selv initierte. — Vi ser at antallet egeninitierte saker går opp etter at vi innførte den nye metodikken. Det er et mer strømlinjeformet system, som vi er glade for, sier Ane Kvaal, politiinspektør og leder for forvaltningsenheten i Hordaland-politiet. Nytt prosjekt Det som har skjedd i mellomtiden, er nemlig at politiet har implementert prosjektet Forebygging gjennom forvaltning. Det er i praksis en ny struktur for å fange opp meldinger fra politiets egne ansatte om personer hvor det er grunn til å tro at vedkommende ikke lenger fyller vilkårene for å inneha en tillatelse fra politiet. Kvaal er forsiktig med å tilskrive det nye prosjektet all æren for at antallet vedtak som følge av egeninitierte saker går opp. — Økningen kan jo skyldes at politiet har blitt flinkere til på melde fra, eller at det finnes flere personer som ikke burde ha førerkort. Men det er vanskelig med sikkerhet å si hva sammenhengen er. Vet du noe om saken? Send MMS/SMS til 2211, eller skriv e-post Publisert Publisert: 16. august 2014 16:51 Oppdatert: 16. august 2014 18:15

Writing my last blog post really got me thinking about that guy and all the crazy things we done. The more I thought about it, the more memories came flooding back and I decided that this blog has been a little too sad/awkward so far and anyone reading must think I’ve had a whole bunch of horrible experiences. It’s about time I chronicled the peaks of my journey so far and this guy is definitely a peak. In fact, I almost peak myself just thinking about him. We met in a field. I was there “camping” with friends. There were no tents. Our trip basically involved trekking into a little patch of woodland on a farm outside of town and getting really drunk/high and having sex round a badly made campfire. It was surprisingly fun. I hadn’t been for a few months because I had actually fallen pregnant there, made it nearly three months into the pregnancy and miscarried. The dad wanted nothing to do with me and I hadn’t told my mum. So instead of facing up to the tragedy and going to hospital, I decided that going back and getting high in conception field was a better idea. I was clearly a child genius. I hated the entire night. I hadn’t been around for months, I didn’t feel like I belonged anymore and I secretly resented everyone around the campfire for not being a little more sensitive to my situation. I was just a little ball of anger in the corner, curled up in a giant “goth” hoodie and unable to even look at the bush in which I had regretfully created life in a drunken fumble. I was starting to see this entire thing for what it really was. Irresponsible and moronic. That’s when he showed up. He looked like an angel in the firelight. He was ballsy and arrogant yet he noticed right away that I wasn’t right. He was the only person that night to ask me if I was ok and he was the only one I hadn’t met before. Don’t get me wrong, he was hardly playing the role of my saviour but there was something about him, beyond the air of arrogance, that just drew me in. I could tell that he also hated the whole “drinking in the woods” scene. At one point he asked me to go home with him but I said no, having just suffered the consequences of losing the only good thing to come out of my last drunken encounter. Everyone got drunk and stripped to their pants except me. There was a lot of jumping over the fire and running around nearly naked. It was fun to watch actually. He played guitar by the fire as we got high until the sun came up and it was just us two left. The night ended with him spooning me on the muddy floor and in the morning, he left with my number and my story. He said I needed reminding of what life is really about and that I was going about it the wrong way in those muddy woods. If I’m honest I expected it to end there, I was broken and he was very aware of how hot he was. I didn’t see why he’d bother with a girl so obviously damaged. But he did. A week later, he calls me and invites me round for pizza and beer at his flat. I don’t know why I went but I did. There was something about his attitude towards life that appealed to me at that time in my life. I’d just miscarried my drunken regret, I was just about to sit important exams, my friends were horrible people and I was self-harming badly. I walked into that guy’s flat a broken mess and by the time we were over, I’d turned my life around and discovered who I really was. One day, I’ll thank him for that. Anyways, back on track with the sex part of “sex blog”. He was a serial charmer and holy god, he was good at it. He made me dinner, we got high and he listened to me as I told him more about how I’d gotten to be where I was in life. Not to mention that he was unbelievably sexy. Before long, he was helping me out of my oversized slipknot hoodie and I had forgotten entirely about my new found chastity. He kissed away all of my resistance with a style of kissing I have since adopted myself, passionate with a lot of lip but no tongue. I was mesmerised and more turned on than I’d ever been before. For once, I wasn’t having sex for attention, for reassurance, for control. I was driven entirely by lust and I loved it. Now, when we were at the campsite the previous week he’d told me that he’d always been insecure about his small penis. He genuinely seemed so down about it which really didn’t match his personality at all as he oozed confidence. At the time, I was flattered that he’d confided in me about it and hadn’t thought much of it. However, as he knelt between my legs about to unveil his tiny penis I was suddenly filled with dread. I was terrified that if I didn’t at least pretend to have the time of my life, his complex would be worsened and I didn’t wanna do that to him. So as he was about to pull off his (very tight and very sexy) boxers, I braced myself for a shrivelled little thing to greet me. Now, the room was dimly lit and I’d been wearing jeans so I had no idea what was about to pop out. It turns out he’d lied about his penis being tiny purely because he liked the look on girls’ faces when they came face to face with what I can only describe as the most perfect penis I’ve ever seen after expecting something insignificant. How deviously twisted of him. I found it hilarious, personally. It definitely tickled me pink. What followed was literally life-changing sex. His tongue gave me tingles in places I didn’t even know could tingle and he done things with his penis that I have never been able to replicate since. It was raw, carnal and rough. I’d been with dominant guys before but I’d always felt like ultimately, I was in control. Not this time. He truly owned every part of me that night and I loved it. He held me down and teased me until I begged and then kept teasing. A few hours in, he’d turned me from a timid and sad girl into a ferocious sex toy and I had never felt so alive. I spent that night acting purely upon selfish impulses and the desire for new sensations rather than thought and logic like usual. He was exactly what I needed to wake me up from the pit of teenage angst I’d fallen into. I went home aching everywhere and grinning ear to ear. I was hooked. I was back the next day and he knew I would be. This time I thought I was ready for him, that I knew what was coming but I’d soon learn that would never be the case with this one. He loved pushing boundaries and was inherently unpredictable. This time we had shower sex and he found it hilarious that I was unable to stay standing when I orgasmed. The next time he tied me up with duct tape and teased me for hours. I just kept coming back for more. Soon I started skipping school to spend time with him. We had high sex, drunk sex,, rough sex, morning sex, slow sex, half asleep sex, angry sex, and ultimately sad sex. It didn’t take me long to convince my immature self that I loved this boy. He’d woken me up from my sadness and I soon confused this new found happiness and emotion with love. I wanted him to myself and even then it was apparent that he was untameable. One time I showed up at his place with fresh cuts on my legs. He was so disappointed. He’d spent weeks building my confidence, teaching me to stop wearing my heart on my sleeve and now I’d relapsed. This was when he really turned my life around. He took me shopping, made me try on girly clothes instead of the usual baggy black clothes I usually wore. He bought me my first lingerie corset-suspender set and my first vibrator (Hamish). He took me to his flat, dressed me up in the lingerie and went over every inch of my body telling me what he found sexy about it. He cuddled me after sex and told me about his view of life, about how I was way too young to be carrying so much bitterness and sadness around on my sleeve. How I’d regret missing out on being young when I’m older. Then he played his guitar and sung his own songs naked (honestly). Since that night I have never cut myself on purpose again. We continued our whirlwind romance. He sneaked me into pubs despite both of us being underage, his charm got him served easily. I tried my first shot with him. He took me to his favourite shop – a little vintage place outside of the city centre. He taught me how to roll a joint and we’d fall asleep during high sex, him still inside me. He encouraged me to help myself along during sex and I had the most powerful orgasms I’d ever had doing that. I starred in my very first sex video with him. I tried anal for he first time after he tied me up with my stockings, gagged me and used my vibrator on me. I found out all of my limits with him and loved every second and every time he pushed me just a little bit further. He pushed me to look for who I really was but despite all of the sweet and sexy things he’d do for me I knew deep down he wasn’t just mine. He refused to commit, he saw other girls and didn’t keep in regular contact. I hated it and pushed for commitment. Then, he found out he was gonna be a dad. He’d gotten some other girl pregnant. I was upset but in my stupid teenage infatuation, I stayed with him. Then I walked in on him and that other girl and that’s where my last post starts. It wasn’t how I’d hoped it would end but by that stage I’d grown in confidence so much that I’d realised that he had given me all I needed to get by on my own. He was a wild one and had no plans for the future and had a baby on the way. I had just aced all of my exams and my future was whatever I wanted it to be. Limitless. The girl went on to have a baby boy. He now has a 4 year old son and last I heard was selling drugs and in a band. He texted me later on and asked if I wanted to have another threesome with him and the baby’s mum or wanted any drugs. I said no and that’s the last I ever heard of the wild boy who taught me how to push boundaries and to be proud of my own body and what I can do with it.

For the Democratic Party, a pliant and friendly news media is both a blessing and a curse. On the one hand, the corporate press's eagerness to rehabilitate Democratic officials after even the most shameful and despicable acts has made it possible for some of the party’s worst actors to maintain political power with relative ease. Then again, the news media’s reflexively and reliably soft coverage of left-wing lawmakers has made the chief benefactors of this cozy relationship both soft and complacent. Democratic officials and candidates have been lulled into a false sense of security, ignoring or forgetting the benefits that come with being tempered by a thorough, brutal vetting. The downside to the corporate media’s mostly hands-off approach to covering Democratically aligned lawmakers was never clearer than it was during the Feb. 19 primary debate in Las Vegas, Nevada. Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who spent much of the evening having his entrails ripped out by his 2020 opponents and paraded around the stage, managed to get in one good blow against Sen. Bernie Sanders, going after the Vermont lawmaker for his conspicuous wealth. “What a wonderful country we have,” said the former mayor. “The best-known socialist in the country happens to be a millionaire with three houses. What did I miss here?” “Well,” an irate Sanders said, “You'll miss that I work in Washington, house one. ” Bloomberg interjected, “That's the first problem.” “Live in Burlington, house two,” the senator continued. The former mayor interrupted again, “That's good.” “And like thousands of other Vermonters, I do have a summer camp. Forgive me for that. Where is your home? Which tax haven do you have your home?” Sanders demanded, hopelessly losing the exchange. “New York City, thank you very much,” Bloomberg said to applause, “and I pay all my taxes.” The most remarkable thing about the exchange is not that Sanders was so easily baited by Bloomberg into making a sloppy, blindly angry defense but that it marked the first time in the 2020 campaign season that anyone, Democrat, reporter, or debate moderator, pressed the 2020 Democratic primary front-runner to reconcile his own considerable fortune with his core message of confiscating wealth from business owners. How did Sanders make it through nine debates without a fellow Democrat or debate moderator asking him to respond to the most obvious criticism he will face should he go up against Trump? The 2016 election was a “takers versus makers” election. It is astonishing, then, that it took for a 2020 Democratic primary candidate who is not even on the ballot in Nevada or South Carolina to ask the millionaire socialist senator about his three houses. I guess that is what happens when you schedule all your primary debates with only friendly news networks. This gets to the precise problem of the too-friendly relationship between the Democratic Party and the corporate media. It is a double-edged sword that allows terrible men to weather what should be career-ending scandals and missteps but also leads to their entire party getting lazy and soft. Not having to worry about a tough, combative press is how you get incidents such as the 2020 Democratic front-runner being totally unprepared to answer the most obvious criticism of his campaign. If Sanders's disastrous handling of Bloomberg's no-brainer broadside is a portent of things to come, the general election meat grinder will be a straight-up bloodbath for Democrats.

Da den fynske optiker Finn Juncker tog til Senegal for at være med til at uddele brugte briller til befolkningen, var han opfyldt af idealisme og entusiasme. Fem år senere måtte han sande, hvor vanskeligt det kan være at hjælpe andre. Finn Juncker har et freelance-optikerfirma. Med udgangspunkt i Fåborg arbejder han også i Albertslund, i Malaga og i Grønland, og i perioder har han arbejdet i Senegal. Det sidste for egen regning. Det afrikanske eventyr begyndte, da han så en annonce i bladet Optikeren, hvor man søgte optikere til et projekt om brugte briller til befolkningen i Senegal. Projektet gik ud på, at indsamle brugte briller i Danmark. Brillerne blev renoveret og repareret af tidligere alkoholikere og narkomaner på et behandlingshjem i Nykøbing Falster og herefter sendt til Senegal. Bag projektet stod en dansk sygeplejerske. Hun søgte to optikere, en sygeplejerske mere og en medhjælper. I 1998 rejste disse fire, inklusive Finn Juncker, til Senegal. De skulle selv betale rejsen og opholdet, og de måtte bruge deres sommerferie på det. - Vi boede i lerhytter hos de lokale og sov på gulvet, og vores tre daglige måltider bestod af ris, som vi selv skulle betale for. Vi havde også udgifter til chauffør og benzin. Vi var der knap tre uger, og vi foretog 200 synsprøver og udleverede 150 par briller hver dag. Folk var kommet gående flere dagsmarcher for at få briller. Desværre kom der også mange blinde og folk med grå stær, som håbede, at vi kunne kurere dem. Det var hårdt at være vidne til. Men de mange, vi kunne hjælpe, var hele rejsen værd, fortæller Finn Juncker. Kort efter projektets start søgte den ledende sygeplejerske om midler hos Danida. Omkring en halv million kr. blev bevilget til de tre år, projektet skulle løbe. Det var nu et Danida-projekt. Nogle af pengene gik til at få senegalesere til Danmark, hvor Finn Juncker oplærte dem, så de kunne fungere som optikere hjemme og således overtage danskernes arbejde. Der gik tre år på denne måde. Finn Juncker brugte to-tre uger hvert år af sin sommerferie på at arbejde som optiker i Senegal, og om vinteren oplærte han senegalesere i Danmark. Men økonomien knirkede. - Der var et eller andet helt galt. Vi betalte alt for meget for den mad, vi spiste, dvs. ris, og alt for meget for benzin og til chaufførens løn. Målt med lokale alen. F.eks. var det den danske stats kilometertakst, der blev anvendt, når vi skulle køre ud og betjene befolkningen. Men brillerne blev leveret, og behovet var stort. Så vi betalte, beretter Finn Juncker. De var jævnligt ude for en del ubehagelige hold-ups ved forskellige checkpoints af krigere med maskingeværer. Området var plaget af uro, og det var ikke ufarligt at bevæge sig omkring dernede. Da projektet udløb efter tre år, opfordrede Finn Juncker tre optikere, han kendte som folk med hjertet på rette sted, til at tage med ham til Senegal i sommerferien og videreføre det påbegyndte arbejde. Han kontaktede folkene i Senegal og fortalte, at et hold på fire danske optikere med et læs briller var klar til at tage af sted på egen hånd. Det vil sige uden Danida-midler. Optikerne ville ikke kunne betale de samme summer til senegaleserne som hidtil for mad og transport. Da kølnedes interessen mærkbart hos senegaleserne, og de fire optikere kom aldrig af sted. Men Finn Juncker er gjort af stædigt stof. Han havde lært en gambianer at kende, som var indehaver af en brillebutik i Gambia, men som ikke var uddannet optiker. De to indgik en forretningsaftale om kompagniskab. Finn Juncker skulle lære ham op og hjælpe ham i gang som partner i foretagenet. Det gik også fint. Finn Juncker uddannede gambianeren i hans butik og havde medbragt en hel del kostbare måleinstrumenter til synsprøver. Meningen var, at gambianeren skulle købe måleinstrumenterne for de penge, han solgte briller for, men han ville hellere købe biler. Da Finn Juncker forklarede ham, at han gerne ville have sine måleinstrumenter tilbage, tilkaldte gambianeren politiet og bildte betjentene ind, at Finn Juncker havde foræret ham instrumenterne. Finn Juncker måtte opgive at få sine instrumenter igen. En ekstra bitter krølle på det eventyr var, at Finn Juncker i Danmark forgæves kæmpede med skattevæsnet, der ikke ville anerkende hans rejse som forretning og udgifterne i den forbindelse som fradragsberettiget. - Jeg indså, at det var slut. Min indsats og mine penge var tabt. De senegalesere, vi havde lært op som optikere her i Danmark, har aldrig fået lov at praktisere i Senegal. Jeg må sige, at jeg har fået et temmelig desillusioneret syn på ulandsstøtte. Pengene går i de forkerte lommer. Og vores projekt er desværre ikke enestående. Det er kendetegnende for en række afrikanske lande, at nogle få magtfulde høvdinge sidder på alt, og de er villige til at gå langt for at få del i støttemidlerne. De bruger pengene til deres egen familie, til at sende deres børn på dyre skoler, til rejser og luksus. Det var situationen omkring brilleprojektet, og det var grunden til, at vi skulle betale så meget for mad og kørsel. Tilbage står tusindvis af fattige og syge, som kunne have været hjulpet ofte for et forholdsvis beskedent beløb, siger Finn Juncker. Han har ikke fortrudt sin indsats i Afrika, men han er skuffet og ærgerlig. Sin trang til at gøre nytte og hjælpe andre får han så udløb for i Grønland.

Introduction Mark J. Terrill/Associated Press Though some have argued that the crowded G.O.P. primary debates would improve if they were more, and not less, of a circus, many critics have lamented the lack of substantive policy discussion by presidential candidates. What changes could be made to the debate formats to make them more substantive?

The Harper government is looking for security experts to help harden federal buildings in the Ottawa area against threats, including possible terror-related attacks. Public Works posted a tender Wednesday asking for professionals to conduct so-called threat risk assessments “to identify employees and assets that need protection, analyze threats against them, assess the current risk, and recommend safeguards.” The review will cover all federally owned or leased buildings in the Ottawa area and may include bridges, dams and other structures, says the document. The posting follows the Oct. 22 shootings at Parliament Hill, which exposed numerous security gaps, as well as the government’s recent claims that Canada is a target for ISIS and related groups based in the Middle East. Grade every deficiency The list of potential risks cited in the material includes terrorism, demonstrations, environmental threats and others, and the tender requires inspections of all elements of buildings, including the siting of washrooms and how the exteriors of buildings are illuminated. The consultants are to grade every deficiency up to the highest level, described as a “condition of vulnerability which exists which may be exploited by opportunistic person(s) or organizations with hostile objectives.” A lone gunman managed to penetrate deep into the Centre Block of the House of Commons on Oct. 22 before being gunned down in a hallway metres from the prime minister and dozens of other politicians. RCMP called in the Ontario Provincial Police to review the security failings exposed by the incident, and their report is expected to be handed down shortly.

It was a Pink Burn-out YO!PS - anyone else see the creator pot-hole on lane 2 there...You can fall in there and they'll never find you!

MANILA (Reuters) - Philippine security forces on Saturday killed a foreign national and his female companion who were suspected of being connected to a militant group supporting Islamic State, police officials said, two days after the group’s leader was also killed. The foreigner, believed to be Pakistani and identified as Abu Naila, resisted arrest and attempted to throw a grenade while a police and military team was conducting a manhunt in Sarangani province, Chief Superintendent Cedrick Train, a police regional director, said. They were conducting an operation against members of the militant Ansar Al-Khilafah Philippines (AKP), one of a handful of small groups that have pledged allegiance to Islamic State and blamed for years of unrest in the Philippine south. On Thursday, police chief Ronald dela Rosa said security forces had effectively broken the backbone of AKP with the killing of its leader, Mohammad Jaafar Maguid, and the arrest of his three AKP colleagues. He has warned of “retaliation” by other AKP members and said security forces were on full alert as Filipino Catholics are set to celebrate the feast of the Black Nazarene, with millions of devotees expected to join processions on Monday in several parts of the country, including Manila. Authorities have linked Maguid’s group to several crimes ranging from arson and murder to bombings. Regional police spokesman Romeo Galgo said they were still verifying the nationality of the foreigner killed on Saturday. “Officers were forced to fire at the suspects when the grenade was lobbed at them,” Train said. President Rodrigo Duterte has warned against Islamic State taking root in the southeast Asian country, saying it needed to avoid “contamination”.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) regained his previously held second place position, according to an Economist/YouGov poll released Wednesday, amplifying the ongoing battle between the Vermont senator and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), who remain neck and neck. Economist/YouGov surveyed 1,500 U.S. citizens (1,111 of whom are registered voters) August 17–20 and asked Democrat primary voters, “If the Democratic presidential primary or caucus in your state were held today, who would you vote for?” Of the Democrat primary voters surveyed, 22 percent chose Joe Biden (D), with Sanders falling just three points behind with 19 percent support. Warren fell to third place with 17 percent support, a significant contrast from last week’s poll, which showed the Massachusetts senator in a statistical tie for first place with Biden: National Democratic Primary: Biden 21 (-1 in a week) Warren 20 (+4) Sanders 16 (+3) Harris 8 (-) O'Rourke 5 (+3) Buttigieg 5 (-3) Booker 2 (+1) Gabbard 2 (-1) Bennet 1 Castro 1 Gillibrand 1 Klobuchar 1 Steyer 1 Williamson 1 Yang 1@TheEconomist /@YouGov https://t.co/WbnJkHHkG7 — Political Polls (@PpollingNumbers) August 14, 2019 This week’s poll showed Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) in fourth place with eight percent support, followed by Mayor Pete Buttigieg (D) and Beto O’Rourke (D) with seven percent and three percent, respectively. The remaining candidates garnered two percent support or less. Twelve percent of voters said they are “not sure” who they will vote for. The poll’s margin of error is+/- 2.6 percent when adjusted for weighting and +/- 3 percent for registered voters. More good news comes for Sanders in terms of the perception of his electability. While most Democrats – 65 percent – view Biden as the most electable candidate, Sanders saw a bump from last week’s poll, jumping from 52 percent to 59 percent. Warren maintained her status, with 57 percent of respondents saying she could “probably beat” President Trump. This poll echoes the Morning Consult poll released Monday, showing Sanders in second place with 20 percent support. As Breitbart News reported: A Morning Consult poll – stemming from interviews with 17,115 Democrat-leaning registered voters August 12–18 – shows Sanders reclaiming his previously held second place position with 20 percent support. While he is still 11 points behind Biden, who has 31 percent support, the Vermont senator is still five points ahead of his closest challenger Warren, who garnered 15 percent support. The survey affirms the storyline of Sen. Kamala Harris’s (D-CA) freefall from the first tier, garnering nine percent support. She is followed by Mayor Pete Buttigieg (D) who has five percent support, and Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ), Beto O’Rourke (D), and Andrew Yang (D), who all received three percent support. The remaining candidates garnered one percent support or less. The margin of error is +/- one percent. The current Real Clear Politics average shows Biden in first place with 28.8 percent support, followed by Sanders in second place with 16 percent support, and Warren in third with 15.4 percent support.

N. American home video distributor announces Spring 2012 release The North American home video distributor Discotek announced on Tuesday that it licensed the first season of the Lupin the 3rd television anime series for release on DVD next spring. The first season consists of the first 23 episodes of the Lupin the 3rd television series. Director Hayao Miyazaki of Ghibli fame directed 14 episodes in the first season. The second season of Lupin the 3rd was previously licensed by Geneon Entertainment USA and aired on Cartoon Network's Adult Swim block. Monkey Punch's original manga began serialization in 1967 and features Lupin the Third, the great nephew of gentleman thief Arsène Lupin. He is routinely pursued by Investigator Zenigata while attempting to steal priceless items and woo women. The manga was adapted into numerous movies, including a Detective Conan crossover special and most recently Lupin III: The Last Job in 2010.

This article is from the archive of our partner . WikiLeaks has a track record of friction with the media organizations it collaborates with, and in the latest example of that, it rubbed The Associated Press the wrong way simply by identifying the news organization as a collaborator. The Syria Files, a massive dump of 2.4 million internal Syrian government emails WikiLeaks released Thursday, initially listed the AP among the organization's "collaborators" on the release. But, as Huffington Post's Michael Calderone reported Thursday, the link to AP was later removed from the collaborators list on WikiLeaks' site. AP spokesman Paul Colford confirmed to The Atlantic Wire that it was AP that asked to be removed from the list. "It was their characterization of what was going on that was inaccurate. It wasn’t a characterization that we asked them to make," he said. Colford explained that WikiLeaks gave AP an advance look at the Syria Files, as do many organizations hoping to generate possible stories, but, as Colford says, "to make it appear as if that rises to the level of us being a collaborator with WikiLeaks is a few miles different." It's not the first time WikiLeaks has driven off media organizations it considered collaborators. The antisecrecy organization really did work cooperatively with outlets like The New York Times and The Guardian in some of its early data dumps like the diplomatic cables it released in 2010. But eventually it fell out with them, and started listing smaller news organizations as collaborators.

AA Türkiye, Cumhurbaşkanlığı sisteminin kabul edildiği 16 Nisan referandumu sonrası ilk defa sandık başına gitti. 56 milyonu aşkın seçmen, cumhurbaşkanı ve 600 milletvekilini belirlemek üzere tek zarfta iki pusulayla oyunu hem yurt içinde hem de yurt dışında kullandı. Oy kullanma işleminin 17.00'de sona ermesinin ardından cumhurbaşkanlığı ve milletvekili seçimleri için yurt dışından ilk sonuçlar gelmeye başladı. HABERTÜRK'ÜN SEÇİM ÖZEL CANLI YAYININI İZLEMEK İÇİN TIKLAYINIZ... YENİ SİSTEMDE NE GİBİ DEĞİŞİKLİKLER OLACAK? 16 Nisan 2017 halkoylamasıyla kesinleşen yeni hükümet sistemi kapsamında bir dizi değişiklik ilk kez uygulanacak. Bazı partiler ilk kez pusulada görülecek şekilde ittifakla seçime girdi. 16 Nisan referandumu ile gerçekleşen Anayasa değişikliği, partili cumhurbaşkanına imkân tanıdığı için bazı cumhurbaşkanı adayları, aynı zamanda partisinin genel başkanı olarak kendi belirlediği milletvekili aday listeleriyle seçmenin önüne çıktı. Başbakanlık ise artık yok... İşte ülke ülke yurtdışı seçim sonuçları... CUMHURBAŞKANI SEÇİMİ ALMANYA FEDERAL CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 1.638 Toplam Seçmen : 1.443.585 Açılan Sandık : 395 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 24,11 Kullanılan Oy : 121.814 Geçerli Oy : 120.409 Katılım Oranı : % 35,62 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 64,97 78.227 Muharrem İnce : % 22,5 27.097 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 9,09 10.950 Meral Akşener : % 2,65 3.185 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,59 708 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,2 242 AMERİKA BİRLEŞİK DEVLETLERİ Toplam Sandık : 114 Toplam Seçmen : 106.301 Açılan Sandık : 17 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 14,91 Kullanılan Oy : 3.966 Geçerli Oy : 3.950 Katılım Oranı : % 25,93 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 74,1 2.927 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 12,38 489 Meral Akşener : % 7,34 290 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 5,29 209 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,58 23 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,3 12 ARNAVUTLUK CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 2 Toplam Seçmen : 1.350 Açılan Sandık : 2 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 100 Kullanılan Oy : 471 Geçerli Oy : 469 Katılım Oranı : % 34,89 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 52,67 247 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 32,62 153 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 7,46 35 Meral Akşener : % 5,33 25 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 1,28 6 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,64 3 AVUSTRALYA Toplam Sandık : 53 Toplam Seçmen : 46.764 Açılan Sandık : 9 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 16,98 Kullanılan Oy : 176 Geçerli Oy : 175 Katılım Oranı : % 3,04 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 62,86 110 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 17,71 31 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 12 21 Meral Akşener : % 4 7 Doğu Perinçek : % 2,29 4 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 1,14 2 AVUSTURYA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 124 Toplam Seçmen : 106.657 Açılan Sandık : 50 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 40,32 Kullanılan Oy : 16.573 Geçerli Oy : 16.398 Katılım Oranı : % 38,32 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 72,01 11.808 Muharrem İnce : % 16,76 2.748 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 8,3 1.361 Meral Akşener : % 1,73 284 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 1,03 169 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,17 28 AZERBAYCAN CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 7 Toplam Seçmen : 5.742 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % NaN 0 Meral Akşener : % NaN 0 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % NaN 0 Selahattin Demirtaş : % NaN 0 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % NaN 0 Doğu Perinçek : % NaN 0 BAHREYN KRALLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 2 Toplam Seçmen : 1.376 Açılan Sandık : 2 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 100 Kullanılan Oy : 686 Geçerli Oy : 685 Katılım Oranı : % 49,85 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 74,01 507 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 17,96 123 Meral Akşener : % 5,11 35 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 2,34 16 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,29 2 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,29 2 BELÇİKA KRALLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 136 Toplam Seçmen : 142.463 Açılan Sandık : 30 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 22,06 Kullanılan Oy : 16.249 Geçerli Oy : 16.026 Katılım Oranı : % 51,73 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 74,57 11.950 Muharrem İnce : % 15,18 2.433 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 6,48 1.038 Meral Akşener : % 2,54 407 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,97 155 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,27 43 BİRLEŞİK ARAP EMİRLİKLERİ Toplam Sandık : 6 Toplam Seçmen : 6.525 Açılan Sandık : 1 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 16,67 Kullanılan Oy : 363 Geçerli Oy : 362 Katılım Oranı : % 28,01 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 72,93 264 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 19,61 71 Meral Akşener : % 3,59 13 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 3,31 12 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,55 2 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0 0 BOSNA HERSEK Toplam Sandık : 4 Toplam Seçmen : 2.463 Açılan Sandık : 1 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 25 Kullanılan Oy : 310 Geçerli Oy : 309 Katılım Oranı : % 50,41 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 62,78 194 Muharrem İnce : % 26,54 82 Meral Akşener : % 7,77 24 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 1,62 5 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 0,97 3 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,32 1 BULGARİSTAN CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 15 Toplam Seçmen : 7.604 Açılan Sandık : 11 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 73,33 Kullanılan Oy : 925 Geçerli Oy : 921 Katılım Oranı : % 16,05 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 56,24 518 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 28,01 258 Meral Akşener : % 8,25 76 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 5,97 55 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 1,09 10 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,43 4 BÜYÜK BRİTANYA VE KUZEY İRLANDA BİRLEŞİK KRALLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 124 Toplam Seçmen : 99.250 Açılan Sandık : 53 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 42,74 Kullanılan Oy : 14.141 Geçerli Oy : 14.018 Katılım Oranı : % 33,6 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 51,95 7.283 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 23,89 3.349 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 21,14 2.963 Meral Akşener : % 2,5 351 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,29 41 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,22 31 CEZAYİR DEMOKRATİK HALK CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 2 Toplam Seçmen : 1.477 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % NaN 0 Meral Akşener : % NaN 0 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % NaN 0 Selahattin Demirtaş : % NaN 0 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % NaN 0 Doğu Perinçek : % NaN 0 ÇEK CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 1 Toplam Seçmen : 1.367 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % NaN 0 Meral Akşener : % NaN 0 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % NaN 0 Selahattin Demirtaş : % NaN 0 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % NaN 0 Doğu Perinçek : % NaN 0 ÇİN HALK CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 8 Toplam Seçmen : 2.260 Açılan Sandık : 6 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 75 Kullanılan Oy : 595 Geçerli Oy : 593 Katılım Oranı : % 40,48 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 57,34 340 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 26,14 155 Meral Akşener : % 7,59 45 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 5,9 35 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 1,85 11 Doğu Perinçek : % 1,18 7 DANİMARKA KRALLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 33 Toplam Seçmen : 35.196 Açılan Sandık : 10 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 30,3 Kullanılan Oy : 3.823 Geçerli Oy : 3.614 Katılım Oranı : % 35,86 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 52,05 1.881 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 19,76 714 Muharrem İnce : % 15,8 571 Meral Akşener : % 11,51 416 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,64 23 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,25 9 FİNLANDİYA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 8 Toplam Seçmen : 5.688 Açılan Sandık : 3 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 37,5 Kullanılan Oy : 773 Geçerli Oy : 772 Katılım Oranı : % 36,24 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Selahattin Demirtaş : % 41,58 321 Muharrem İnce : % 34,84 269 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 20,08 155 Meral Akşener : % 2,98 23 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,39 3 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,13 1 FRANSA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 330 Toplam Seçmen : 340.751 Açılan Sandık : 135 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 40,91 Kullanılan Oy : 60.996 Geçerli Oy : 60.256 Katılım Oranı : % 44,67 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 64,59 38.922 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 18,26 11.001 Muharrem İnce : % 14,68 8.844 Meral Akşener : % 1,69 1.020 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,65 394 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,12 75 GÜNEY AFRİKA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 1 Toplam Seçmen : 1.093 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % NaN 0 Meral Akşener : % NaN 0 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % NaN 0 Selahattin Demirtaş : % NaN 0 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % NaN 0 Doğu Perinçek : % NaN 0 GÜRCİSTAN CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 2 Toplam Seçmen : 1.799 Açılan Sandık : 1 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 50 Kullanılan Oy : 248 Geçerli Oy : 248 Katılım Oranı : % 28,15 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 45,16 112 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 42,34 105 Meral Akşener : % 9,68 24 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 2,82 7 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0 0 Doğu Perinçek : % 0 0 HOLLANDA KRALLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 355 Toplam Seçmen : 260.264 Açılan Sandık : 159 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 44,79 Kullanılan Oy : 44.582 Geçerli Oy : 44.109 Katılım Oranı : % 36,25 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 72,72 32.076 Muharrem İnce : % 18,21 8.032 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 5,46 2.407 Meral Akşener : % 2,79 1.230 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,68 301 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,14 63 IRAK CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 3 Toplam Seçmen : 3.421 Açılan Sandık : 1 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 33,33 Kullanılan Oy : 31 Geçerli Oy : 30 Katılım Oranı : % 3,4 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 43,33 13 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 40 12 Meral Akşener : % 13,33 4 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 3,33 1 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0 0 Doğu Perinçek : % 0 0 İRAN İSLAM CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 3 Toplam Seçmen : 1.082 Açılan Sandık : 3 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 100 Kullanılan Oy : 282 Geçerli Oy : 281 Katılım Oranı : % 26,06 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 40,57 114 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 35,94 101 Meral Akşener : % 11,39 32 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 7,83 22 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 2,49 7 Doğu Perinçek : % 1,78 5 İRLANDA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 3 Toplam Seçmen : 2.238 Açılan Sandık : 1 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 33,33 Kullanılan Oy : 310 Geçerli Oy : 310 Katılım Oranı : % 41,55 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 66,13 205 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 17,42 54 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 11,61 36 Meral Akşener : % 4,52 14 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,32 1 Doğu Perinçek : % 0 0 İSPANYA KRALLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 4 Toplam Seçmen : 3.568 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % NaN 0 Meral Akşener : % NaN 0 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % NaN 0 Selahattin Demirtaş : % NaN 0 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % NaN 0 Doğu Perinçek : % NaN 0 İSRAİL DEVLETİ Toplam Sandık : 4 Toplam Seçmen : 4.969 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % NaN 0 Meral Akşener : % NaN 0 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % NaN 0 Selahattin Demirtaş : % NaN 0 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % NaN 0 Doğu Perinçek : % NaN 0 İSVEÇ KRALLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 34 Toplam Seçmen : 38.879 Açılan Sandık : 7 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 20,59 Kullanılan Oy : 2.170 Geçerli Oy : 2.158 Katılım Oranı : % 27,12 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 42,82 924 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 33,27 718 Muharrem İnce : % 19,65 424 Meral Akşener : % 3,8 82 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,42 9 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,05 1 İSVİÇRE KONFEDERASYONU Toplam Sandık : 98 Toplam Seçmen : 98.929 Açılan Sandık : 35 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 35,71 Kullanılan Oy : 15.427 Geçerli Oy : 15.297 Katılım Oranı : % 43,57 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 35,92 5.494 Muharrem İnce : % 32,17 4.921 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 28,45 4.352 Meral Akşener : % 2,62 401 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,51 78 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,33 51 İTALYA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 15 Toplam Seçmen : 15.496 Açılan Sandık : 4 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 26,67 Kullanılan Oy : 1.885 Geçerli Oy : 1.870 Katılım Oranı : % 45,18 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 45,4 849 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 28,82 539 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 21,82 408 Meral Akşener : % 3,48 65 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,27 5 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,21 4 JAPONYA Toplam Sandık : 4 Toplam Seçmen : 3.863 Açılan Sandık : 2 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 50 Kullanılan Oy : 856 Geçerli Oy : 843 Katılım Oranı : % 44,35 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Selahattin Demirtaş : % 40,33 340 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 37,25 314 Muharrem İnce : % 19,57 165 Meral Akşener : % 2,14 18 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,36 3 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,36 3 KANADA Toplam Sandık : 39 Toplam Seçmen : 28.095 Açılan Sandık : 16 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 41,03 Kullanılan Oy : 4.195 Geçerli Oy : 4.176 Katılım Oranı : % 28,3 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 53,11 2.218 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 27,3 1.140 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 15,4 643 Meral Akşener : % 3,42 143 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,48 20 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,29 12 KATAR DEVLETİ Toplam Sandık : 6 Toplam Seçmen : 3.394 Açılan Sandık : 6 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 100 Kullanılan Oy : 1.432 Geçerli Oy : 1.427 Katılım Oranı : % 42,19 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 60,13 858 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 29,22 417 Meral Akşener : % 5,19 74 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 4,7 67 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,56 8 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,21 3 KAZAKİSTAN CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 6 Toplam Seçmen : 4.568 Açılan Sandık : 2 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 33,33 Kullanılan Oy : 358 Geçerli Oy : 355 Katılım Oranı : % 24,47 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 53,8 191 Muharrem İnce : % 31,83 113 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 6,76 24 Meral Akşener : % 6,48 23 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,85 3 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,28 1 KIRGIZ CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 2 Toplam Seçmen : 2.331 Açılan Sandık : 2 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 100 Kullanılan Oy : 843 Geçerli Oy : 827 Katılım Oranı : % 36,16 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 58,52 484 Muharrem İnce : % 21,4 177 Meral Akşener : % 12,33 102 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 5,44 45 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 2,06 17 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,24 2 KOSOVA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 2 Toplam Seçmen : 1.666 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % NaN 0 Meral Akşener : % NaN 0 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % NaN 0 Selahattin Demirtaş : % NaN 0 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % NaN 0 Doğu Perinçek : % NaN 0 KUVEYT DEVLETİ Toplam Sandık : 1 Toplam Seçmen : 1.912 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % NaN 0 Meral Akşener : % NaN 0 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % NaN 0 Selahattin Demirtaş : % NaN 0 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % NaN 0 Doğu Perinçek : % NaN 0 KUZEY KIBRIS TÜRK CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 60 Toplam Seçmen : 106.446 Açılan Sandık : 9 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 15 Kullanılan Oy : 5.880 Geçerli Oy : 5.830 Katılım Oranı : % 36,83 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 50,81 2.962 Muharrem İnce : % 36,31 2.117 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 7,72 450 Meral Akşener : % 4,72 275 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,22 13 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,22 13 LÜBNAN CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 6 Toplam Seçmen : 4.759 Açılan Sandık : 3 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 50 Kullanılan Oy : 870 Geçerli Oy : 855 Katılım Oranı : % 36,57 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 94,5 808 Muharrem İnce : % 3,27 28 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 1,29 11 Meral Akşener : % 0,94 8 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0 0 Doğu Perinçek : % 0 0 LÜKSEMBURG BÜYÜK DÜKALIĞI Toplam Sandık : 22 Toplam Seçmen : 778 Açılan Sandık : 6 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 27,27 Kullanılan Oy : 2.457 Geçerli Oy : 2.440 Katılım Oranı : % 1170 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 61,31 1.496 Muharrem İnce : % 22,75 555 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 14,06 343 Meral Akşener : % 1,27 31 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,33 8 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,29 7 MACARİSTAN Toplam Sandık : 2 Toplam Seçmen : 2.156 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % NaN 0 Meral Akşener : % NaN 0 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % NaN 0 Selahattin Demirtaş : % NaN 0 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % NaN 0 Doğu Perinçek : % NaN 0 MAKEDONYA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 4 Toplam Seçmen : 2.518 Açılan Sandık : 4 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 100 Kullanılan Oy : 645 Geçerli Oy : 642 Katılım Oranı : % 25,62 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 58,41 375 Muharrem İnce : % 29,13 187 Meral Akşener : % 6,54 42 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 5,14 33 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,78 5 Doğu Perinçek : % 0 0 MALTA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 1 Toplam Seçmen : 678 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % NaN 0 Meral Akşener : % NaN 0 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % NaN 0 Selahattin Demirtaş : % NaN 0 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % NaN 0 Doğu Perinçek : % NaN 0 MISIR ARAP CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 2 Toplam Seçmen : 1.486 Açılan Sandık : 1 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 50 Kullanılan Oy : 273 Geçerli Oy : 271 Katılım Oranı : % 22,86 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 56,46 153 Muharrem İnce : % 33,21 90 Meral Akşener : % 5,54 15 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 2,58 7 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 1,85 5 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,37 1 MOLDOVA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 1 Toplam Seçmen : 573 Açılan Sandık : 1 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 100 Kullanılan Oy : 167 Geçerli Oy : 163 Katılım Oranı : % 29,14 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 44,17 72 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 40,49 66 Meral Akşener : % 7,98 13 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 7,36 12 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0 0 Doğu Perinçek : % 0 0 NORVEÇ KRALLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 12 Toplam Seçmen : 8.676 Açılan Sandık : 6 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 50 Kullanılan Oy : 1.411 Geçerli Oy : 1.407 Katılım Oranı : % 32,53 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 49,54 697 Muharrem İnce : % 25,44 358 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 19,9 280 Meral Akşener : % 3,55 50 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 1,42 20 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,14 2 ÖZBEKİSTAN CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 1 Toplam Seçmen : 866 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % NaN 0 Meral Akşener : % NaN 0 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % NaN 0 Selahattin Demirtaş : % NaN 0 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % NaN 0 Doğu Perinçek : % NaN 0 POLONYA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 3 Toplam Seçmen : 3.980 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % NaN 0 Meral Akşener : % NaN 0 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % NaN 0 Selahattin Demirtaş : % NaN 0 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % NaN 0 Doğu Perinçek : % NaN 0 ROMANYA Toplam Sandık : 8 Toplam Seçmen : 6.819 Açılan Sandık : 3 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 37,5 Kullanılan Oy : 917 Geçerli Oy : 914 Katılım Oranı : % 30,51 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 44,97 411 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 33,81 309 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 15,75 144 Meral Akşener : % 4,49 41 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,55 5 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,44 4 RUSYA FEDERASYONU Toplam Sandık : 14 Toplam Seçmen : 11.350 Açılan Sandık : 3 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 21,43 Kullanılan Oy : 850 Geçerli Oy : 848 Katılım Oranı : % 27,48 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 58,25 494 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 24,53 208 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 9,79 83 Meral Akşener : % 6,49 55 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,47 4 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,47 4 SIRBİSTAN CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 1 Toplam Seçmen : 571 Açılan Sandık : 1 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 100 Kullanılan Oy : 187 Geçerli Oy : 187 Katılım Oranı : % 32,75 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 63,64 119 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 23,53 44 Meral Akşener : % 6,95 13 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 4,28 8 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 1,07 2 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,53 1 SİNGAPUR CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 1 Toplam Seçmen : 647 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % NaN 0 Meral Akşener : % NaN 0 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % NaN 0 Selahattin Demirtaş : % NaN 0 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % NaN 0 Doğu Perinçek : % NaN 0 SUDAN CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 2 Toplam Seçmen : 924 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % NaN 0 Meral Akşener : % NaN 0 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % NaN 0 Selahattin Demirtaş : % NaN 0 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % NaN 0 Doğu Perinçek : % NaN 0 SUUDİ ARABİSTAN KRALLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 20 Toplam Seçmen : 23.552 Açılan Sandık : 3 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 15 Kullanılan Oy : 932 Geçerli Oy : 921 Katılım Oranı : % 26,48 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 49,4 455 Muharrem İnce : % 45,71 421 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 1,95 18 Meral Akşener : % 1,85 17 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,98 9 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,11 1 TAYLAND KRALLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 1 Toplam Seçmen : 883 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % NaN 0 Meral Akşener : % NaN 0 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % NaN 0 Selahattin Demirtaş : % NaN 0 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % NaN 0 Doğu Perinçek : % NaN 0 TÜRKMENİSTAN Toplam Sandık : 6 Toplam Seçmen : 1.576 Açılan Sandık : 6 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 100 Kullanılan Oy : 488 Geçerli Oy : 486 Katılım Oranı : % 30,96 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 50,21 244 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 35,6 173 Meral Akşener : % 7,82 38 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 4,12 20 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 2,06 10 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,21 1 UKRAYNA Toplam Sandık : 4 Toplam Seçmen : 3.557 Açılan Sandık : 2 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 50 Kullanılan Oy : 422 Geçerli Oy : 421 Katılım Oranı : % 30,47 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 49,88 210 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 30,64 129 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 9,74 41 Meral Akşener : % 8,79 37 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,48 2 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,48 2 UMMAN SULTANLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 2 Toplam Seçmen : 1.218 Açılan Sandık : 1 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 50 Kullanılan Oy : 246 Geçerli Oy : 245 Katılım Oranı : % 40,39 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 71,02 174 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 24,08 59 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 3,27 8 Meral Akşener : % 1,22 3 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,41 1 Doğu Perinçek : % 0 0 ÜRDÜN HAŞİMİ KRALLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 2 Toplam Seçmen : 1.940 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % NaN 0 Meral Akşener : % NaN 0 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % NaN 0 Selahattin Demirtaş : % NaN 0 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % NaN 0 Doğu Perinçek : % NaN 0 YENİ ZELANDA Toplam Sandık : 1 Toplam Seçmen : 812 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % NaN 0 Meral Akşener : % NaN 0 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % NaN 0 Selahattin Demirtaş : % NaN 0 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % NaN 0 Doğu Perinçek : % NaN 0 YUNANİSTAN CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 14 Toplam Seçmen : 11.055 Açılan Sandık : 13 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 92,86 Kullanılan Oy : 896 Geçerli Oy : 888 Katılım Oranı : % 9,08 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı Muharrem İnce : % 55,18 490 Recep Tayyip Erdoğan : % 23,31 207 Selahattin Demirtaş : % 17,12 152 Meral Akşener : % 3,83 34 Temel Karamollaoğlu : % 0,45 4 Doğu Perinçek : % 0,11 1 MİLLETVEKİLİ GENEL SEÇİMİ ALMANYA FEDERAL CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 1.638 Toplam Seçmen : 1.443.585 Açılan Sandık : 359 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 21,92 Kullanılan Oy : 106.361 Geçerli Oy : 105.168 Katılım Oranı : % 34,66 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 63,5 66.785 AK PARTİ : % 54,75 57.582 MHP : % 7,59 7.987 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 19,85 20.874 CHP : % 15,92 16.743 İYİ PARTİ : % 3,29 3.463 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 0,64 675 HÜDA PAR : % 0,16 173 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,17 180 HDP : % 13,18 13.864 DİĞER : % 2,94 3.087 AMERİKA BİRLEŞİK DEVLETLERİ Toplam Sandık : 114 Toplam Seçmen : 106.301 Açılan Sandık : 16 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 14,04 Kullanılan Oy : 3.772 Geçerli Oy : 3.755 Katılım Oranı : % 26,45 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 9,77 367 AK PARTİ : % 10,68 401 MHP : % 1,81 68 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 58,03 2.179 CHP : % 52,17 1.959 İYİ PARTİ : % 12,06 453 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 1,15 43 HDP : % 20,88 784 DİĞER : % 0,43 16 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,19 7 HÜDA PAR : % 0 0 ARNAVUTLUK CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 2 Toplam Seçmen : 1.350 Açılan Sandık : 1 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 50 Kullanılan Oy : 186 Geçerli Oy : 186 Katılım Oranı : % 27,56 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 42,47 79 AK PARTİ : % 32,26 60 MHP : % 8,06 15 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 43,55 81 CHP : % 31,18 58 İYİ PARTİ : % 8,6 16 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 3,76 7 HÜDA PAR : % 0 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 1,08 2 HDP : % 12,9 24 AVUSTRALYA Toplam Sandık : 53 Toplam Seçmen : 46.764 Açılan Sandık : 10 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 18,87 Kullanılan Oy : 650 Geçerli Oy : 648 Katılım Oranı : % 9,53 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 35,8 232 AK PARTİ : % 32,25 209 MHP : % 2,93 19 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 43,98 285 CHP : % 36,88 239 İYİ PARTİ : % 6,48 42 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 0,31 2 HÜDA PAR : % 0 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,93 6 HDP : % 19,29 125 AVUSTURYA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 124 Toplam Seçmen : 106.657 Açılan Sandık : 41 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 33,06 Kullanılan Oy : 14.102 Geçerli Oy : 13.958 Katılım Oranı : % 39,55 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 71,87 10.032 AK PARTİ : % 63,1 8.807 MHP : % 7,74 1.081 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 15,53 2.168 CHP : % 11,18 1.561 İYİ PARTİ : % 2,71 378 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 1,28 178 HDP : % 12,11 1.691 DİĞER : % 0,16 22 HÜDA PAR : % 0,17 24 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,15 21 AZERBAYCAN CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 7 Toplam Seçmen : 5.742 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 AK PARTİ : % NaN 0 MHP : % NaN 0 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 CHP : % NaN 0 SAADET PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 İYİ PARTİ : % NaN 0 HÜDA PAR : % NaN 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 HDP : % NaN 0 BAHREYN KRALLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 2 Toplam Seçmen : 1.376 Açılan Sandık : 2 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 100 Kullanılan Oy : 686 Geçerli Oy : 683 Katılım Oranı : % 49,85 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,59 4 HDP : % 10,83 74 DİĞER : % 6,44 44 BELÇİKA KRALLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 136 Toplam Seçmen : 142.463 Açılan Sandık : 25 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 18,38 Kullanılan Oy : 12.745 Geçerli Oy : 12.583 Katılım Oranı : % 48,7 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 74,49 9.373 AK PARTİ : % 63,62 8.005 MHP : % 9,92 1.248 HÜDA PAR : % 0,16 20 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,18 23 HDP : % 9,71 1.222 DİĞER : % 0,44 55 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 9 1.133 CHP : % 10,4 1.309 İYİ PARTİ : % 3,48 438 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 1,06 133 BİRLEŞİK ARAP EMİRLİKLERİ Toplam Sandık : 6 Toplam Seçmen : 6.525 Açılan Sandık : 1 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 16,67 Kullanılan Oy : 363 Geçerli Oy : 361 Katılım Oranı : % 28,01 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 20,78 75 AK PARTİ : % 16,62 60 MHP : % 3,88 14 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 66,48 240 CHP : % 54,29 196 İYİ PARTİ : % 11,91 43 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 0 0 HÜDA PAR : % 0 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,28 1 HDP : % 12,47 45 BOSNA HERSEK Toplam Sandık : 4 Toplam Seçmen : 2.463 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 AK PARTİ : % NaN 0 MHP : % NaN 0 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 CHP : % NaN 0 SAADET PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 İYİ PARTİ : % NaN 0 HÜDA PAR : % NaN 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 HDP : % NaN 0 BULGARİSTAN CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 15 Toplam Seçmen : 7.604 Açılan Sandık : 11 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 73,33 Kullanılan Oy : 925 Geçerli Oy : 922 Katılım Oranı : % 16,05 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 29,28 270 AK PARTİ : % 24,19 223 MHP : % 4,88 45 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 60,09 554 CHP : % 43,17 398 İYİ PARTİ : % 15,4 142 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 1,41 13 HÜDA PAR : % 0 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,11 1 HDP : % 10,52 97 BÜYÜK BRİTANYA VE KUZEY İRLANDA BİRLEŞİK KRALLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 124 Toplam Seçmen : 99.250 Açılan Sandık : 46 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 37,1 Kullanılan Oy : 12.198 Geçerli Oy : 12.068 Katılım Oranı : % 33,4 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 21,21 2.560 AK PARTİ : % 18,19 2.195 MHP : % 2,88 348 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 29,14 3.517 CHP : % 24,62 2.971 İYİ PARTİ : % 3,96 478 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 0,46 55 HÜDA PAR : % 0,17 21 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,29 35 HDP : % 47,8 5.768 DİĞER : % 1,38 167 CEZAYİR DEMOKRATİK HALK CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 2 Toplam Seçmen : 1.477 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 AK PARTİ : % NaN 0 MHP : % NaN 0 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 CHP : % NaN 0 SAADET PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 İYİ PARTİ : % NaN 0 HÜDA PAR : % NaN 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 HDP : % NaN 0 ÇEK CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 1 Toplam Seçmen : 1.367 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 AK PARTİ : % NaN 0 MHP : % NaN 0 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 CHP : % NaN 0 SAADET PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 İYİ PARTİ : % NaN 0 HÜDA PAR : % NaN 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 HDP : % NaN 0 ÇİN HALK CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 8 Toplam Seçmen : 2.260 Açılan Sandık : 6 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 75 Kullanılan Oy : 595 Geçerli Oy : 590 Katılım Oranı : % 40,48 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 16,95 100 AK PARTİ : % 23,05 136 MHP : % 3,73 22 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 54,92 324 CHP : % 39,15 231 İYİ PARTİ : % 13,22 78 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 1,86 11 HÜDA PAR : % 0 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,51 3 HDP : % 16,61 98 DİĞER : % 1,02 6 DANİMARKA KRALLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 33 Toplam Seçmen : 35.196 Açılan Sandık : 10 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 30,3 Kullanılan Oy : 3.657 Geçerli Oy : 3.628 Katılım Oranı : % 34,31 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 53,94 1.957 AK PARTİ : % 45,89 1.665 MHP : % 7,52 273 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 14,36 521 CHP : % 11,03 400 İYİ PARTİ : % 2,98 108 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 0,28 10 HÜDA PAR : % 0,03 1 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,28 10 HDP : % 31,09 1.128 DİĞER : % 0,3 11 FİNLANDİYA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 8 Toplam Seçmen : 5.688 Açılan Sandık : 3 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 37,5 Kullanılan Oy : 774 Geçerli Oy : 774 Katılım Oranı : % 36,29 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı HÜDA PAR : % 0,26 2 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,26 2 HDP : % 52,58 407 DİĞER : % 0,13 1 FRANSA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 330 Toplam Seçmen : 340.751 Açılan Sandık : 100 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 30,3 Kullanılan Oy : 43.544 Geçerli Oy : 43.007 Katılım Oranı : % 42,56 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 64,84 27.886 AK PARTİ : % 56,3 24.212 MHP : % 7,91 3.402 HÜDA PAR : % 0,08 36 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,18 79 HDP : % 21,65 9.311 DİĞER : % 1,03 445 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 10,12 4.354 CHP : % 9,64 4.145 İYİ PARTİ : % 1,94 835 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 0,59 252 GÜNEY AFRİKA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 1 Toplam Seçmen : 1.093 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 AK PARTİ : % NaN 0 MHP : % NaN 0 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 CHP : % NaN 0 SAADET PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 İYİ PARTİ : % NaN 0 HÜDA PAR : % NaN 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 HDP : % NaN 0 GÜRCİSTAN CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 2 Toplam Seçmen : 1.799 Açılan Sandık : 1 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 50 Kullanılan Oy : 249 Geçerli Oy : 247 Katılım Oranı : % 28,26 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 44,13 109 AK PARTİ : % 33,6 83 MHP : % 9,72 24 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 46,15 114 CHP : % 33,6 83 İYİ PARTİ : % 11,34 28 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 0,81 2 HÜDA PAR : % 0 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0 0 HDP : % 9,72 24 HOLLANDA KRALLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 355 Toplam Seçmen : 260.264 Açılan Sandık : 148 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 41,69 Kullanılan Oy : 38.663 Geçerli Oy : 38.322 Katılım Oranı : % 33,19 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 72,63 27.833 AK PARTİ : % 61,67 23.634 MHP : % 10,52 4.032 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 16,98 6.508 CHP : % 12,39 4.747 İYİ PARTİ : % 3,46 1.326 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 0,98 377 HÜDA PAR : % 0,08 31 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,19 71 HDP : % 9,38 3.593 DİĞER : % 0,75 286 IRAK CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 3 Toplam Seçmen : 3.421 Açılan Sandık : 1 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 33,33 Kullanılan Oy : 31 Geçerli Oy : 31 Katılım Oranı : % 3,4 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 38,71 12 AK PARTİ : % 38,71 12 MHP : % 0 0 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 51,61 16 CHP : % 35,48 11 İYİ PARTİ : % 16,13 5 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 0 0 HÜDA PAR : % 3,23 1 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0 0 HDP : % 6,45 2 İRAN İSLAM CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 3 Toplam Seçmen : 1.082 Açılan Sandık : 3 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 100 Kullanılan Oy : 283 Geçerli Oy : 282 Katılım Oranı : % 26,16 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı HDP : % 15,25 43 DİĞER : % 0,35 1 CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 29,08 82 AK PARTİ : % 28,72 81 MHP : % 6,74 19 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 33,33 94 CHP : % 26,95 76 İYİ PARTİ : % 15,96 45 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 3,9 11 HÜDA PAR : % 0,35 1 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 1,42 4 İRLANDA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 3 Toplam Seçmen : 2.238 Açılan Sandık : 1 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 33,33 Kullanılan Oy : 310 Geçerli Oy : 310 Katılım Oranı : % 41,55 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 17,1 53 AK PARTİ : % 13,87 43 MHP : % 2,9 9 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 55,81 173 CHP : % 43,87 136 İYİ PARTİ : % 11,29 35 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 0,65 2 HÜDA PAR : % 0,32 1 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,32 1 HDP : % 26,45 82 İSPANYA KRALLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 4 Toplam Seçmen : 3.568 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 AK PARTİ : % NaN 0 MHP : % NaN 0 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 CHP : % NaN 0 SAADET PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 İYİ PARTİ : % NaN 0 HÜDA PAR : % NaN 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 HDP : % NaN 0 İSRAİL DEVLETİ Toplam Sandık : 4 Toplam Seçmen : 4.969 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 AK PARTİ : % NaN 0 MHP : % NaN 0 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 CHP : % NaN 0 SAADET PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 İYİ PARTİ : % NaN 0 HÜDA PAR : % NaN 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 HDP : % NaN 0 İSVEÇ KRALLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 34 Toplam Seçmen : 38.879 Açılan Sandık : 6 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 17,65 Kullanılan Oy : 1.948 Geçerli Oy : 1.930 Katılım Oranı : % 28,4 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 43,58 841 AK PARTİ : % 36,01 695 MHP : % 7,25 140 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 18,81 363 CHP : % 13,89 268 İYİ PARTİ : % 4,4 85 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 0,47 9 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,1 2 HDP : % 37,41 722 DİĞER : % 0,1 2 İSVİÇRE KONFEDERASYONU Toplam Sandık : 98 Toplam Seçmen : 98.929 Açılan Sandık : 24 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 24,49 Kullanılan Oy : 10.163 Geçerli Oy : 10.085 Katılım Oranı : % 41,92 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 37,58 3.790 AK PARTİ : % 31,84 3.211 MHP : % 5,39 544 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 20,49 2.066 CHP : % 16,46 1.660 İYİ PARTİ : % 3,42 345 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 0,56 56 HÜDA PAR : % 0,15 15 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,26 26 HDP : % 41,13 4.148 DİĞER : % 0,4 40 İTALYA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 15 Toplam Seçmen : 15.496 Açılan Sandık : 2 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 13,33 Kullanılan Oy : 891 Geçerli Oy : 886 Katılım Oranı : % 40,65 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 27,09 240 AK PARTİ : % 24,15 214 MHP : % 2,82 25 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 36,68 325 CHP : % 30,36 269 İYİ PARTİ : % 5,98 53 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 0,23 2 HÜDA PAR : % 0,34 3 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,11 1 HDP : % 35,78 317 JAPONYA Toplam Sandık : 4 Toplam Seçmen : 3.863 Açılan Sandık : 1 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 25 Kullanılan Oy : 304 Geçerli Oy : 303 Katılım Oranı : % 31,5 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 38,94 118 AK PARTİ : % 34,32 104 MHP : % 3,96 12 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 20,79 63 CHP : % 14,85 45 İYİ PARTİ : % 4,62 14 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 1,32 4 HÜDA PAR : % 0 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,33 1 HDP : % 39,93 121 KANADA Toplam Sandık : 39 Toplam Seçmen : 28.095 Açılan Sandık : 15 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 38,46 Kullanılan Oy : 4.128 Geçerli Oy : 4.106 Katılım Oranı : % 31,81 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 27,81 1.142 AK PARTİ : % 24,18 993 MHP : % 3,36 138 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 42,3 1.737 CHP : % 35,53 1.459 İYİ PARTİ : % 5,87 241 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 0,56 23 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,15 6 HDP : % 28,54 1.172 DİĞER : % 1,12 46 HÜDA PAR : % 0,07 3 KATAR DEVLETİ Toplam Sandık : 6 Toplam Seçmen : 3.394 Açılan Sandık : 4 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 66,67 Kullanılan Oy : 968 Geçerli Oy : 963 Katılım Oranı : % 42,83 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 29,18 281 AK PARTİ : % 24,3 234 MHP : % 4,67 45 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 56,18 541 CHP : % 44,86 432 İYİ PARTİ : % 9,97 96 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 0,73 7 HÜDA PAR : % 0 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,31 3 HDP : % 14,33 138 KAZAKİSTAN CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 6 Toplam Seçmen : 4.568 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 AK PARTİ : % NaN 0 MHP : % NaN 0 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 CHP : % NaN 0 SAADET PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 İYİ PARTİ : % NaN 0 HÜDA PAR : % NaN 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 HDP : % NaN 0 KIRGIZ CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 2 Toplam Seçmen : 2.331 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 AK PARTİ : % NaN 0 MHP : % NaN 0 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 CHP : % NaN 0 SAADET PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 İYİ PARTİ : % NaN 0 HÜDA PAR : % NaN 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 HDP : % NaN 0 KOSOVA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 2 Toplam Seçmen : 1.666 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 AK PARTİ : % NaN 0 MHP : % NaN 0 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 CHP : % NaN 0 SAADET PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 İYİ PARTİ : % NaN 0 HÜDA PAR : % NaN 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 HDP : % NaN 0 KUVEYT DEVLETİ Toplam Sandık : 1 Toplam Seçmen : 1.912 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 AK PARTİ : % NaN 0 MHP : % NaN 0 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 CHP : % NaN 0 SAADET PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 İYİ PARTİ : % NaN 0 HÜDA PAR : % NaN 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 HDP : % NaN 0 KUZEY KIBRIS TÜRK CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 60 Toplam Seçmen : 106.446 Açılan Sandık : 10 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 16,67 Kullanılan Oy : 6.487 Geçerli Oy : 6.419 Katılım Oranı : % 36,57 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 50,58 3.247 AK PARTİ : % 42,02 2.697 MHP : % 7,59 487 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 36,3 2.330 CHP : % 27,2 1.746 İYİ PARTİ : % 8,35 536 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 0,65 42 HÜDA PAR : % 0,02 1 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,14 9 HDP : % 12,76 819 DİĞER : % 0,2 13 LÜBNAN CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 6 Toplam Seçmen : 4.759 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 AK PARTİ : % NaN 0 MHP : % NaN 0 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 CHP : % NaN 0 SAADET PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 İYİ PARTİ : % NaN 0 HÜDA PAR : % NaN 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 HDP : % NaN 0 LÜKSEMBURG BÜYÜK DÜKALIĞI Toplam Sandık : 22 Toplam Seçmen : 778 Açılan Sandık : 2 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 9,09 Kullanılan Oy : 1.060 Geçerli Oy : 1.048 Katılım Oranı : % 1514,29 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 61,45 644 AK PARTİ : % 48,85 512 MHP : % 12,02 126 HÜDA PAR : % 0,1 1 HDP : % 16,98 178 DİĞER : % 7,25 76 MACARİSTAN Toplam Sandık : 2 Toplam Seçmen : 2.156 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 AK PARTİ : % NaN 0 MHP : % NaN 0 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 CHP : % NaN 0 SAADET PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 İYİ PARTİ : % NaN 0 HÜDA PAR : % NaN 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 HDP : % NaN 0 MAKEDONYA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 4 Toplam Seçmen : 2.518 Açılan Sandık : 4 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 100 Kullanılan Oy : 645 Geçerli Oy : 643 Katılım Oranı : % 25,62 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 59,56 383 AK PARTİ : % 52,72 339 MHP : % 6,53 42 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 31,73 204 CHP : % 20,53 132 İYİ PARTİ : % 6,38 41 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 4,67 30 HÜDA PAR : % 0,16 1 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,47 3 HDP : % 8,09 52 MALTA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 1 Toplam Seçmen : 678 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 AK PARTİ : % NaN 0 MHP : % NaN 0 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 CHP : % NaN 0 SAADET PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 İYİ PARTİ : % NaN 0 HÜDA PAR : % NaN 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 HDP : % NaN 0 MISIR ARAP CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 2 Toplam Seçmen : 1.486 Açılan Sandık : 1 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 50 Kullanılan Oy : 273 Geçerli Oy : 272 Katılım Oranı : % 22,86 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 55,88 152 AK PARTİ : % 52,21 142 MHP : % 2,94 8 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 34,93 95 CHP : % 22,43 61 İYİ PARTİ : % 9,56 26 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 2,94 8 HÜDA PAR : % 0 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,37 1 HDP : % 8,82 24 MOLDOVA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 1 Toplam Seçmen : 573 Açılan Sandık : 1 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 100 Kullanılan Oy : 167 Geçerli Oy : 164 Katılım Oranı : % 29,14 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 40,24 66 AK PARTİ : % 35,37 58 MHP : % 4,88 8 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 45,12 74 CHP : % 32,93 54 İYİ PARTİ : % 10,98 18 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 0,61 1 HÜDA PAR : % 0 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0 0 HDP : % 14,63 24 NORVEÇ KRALLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 12 Toplam Seçmen : 8.676 Açılan Sandık : 5 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 41,67 Kullanılan Oy : 1.209 Geçerli Oy : 1.203 Katılım Oranı : % 33,44 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 49,88 600 AK PARTİ : % 45,72 550 MHP : % 3,82 46 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,25 3 HDP : % 25,77 310 DİĞER : % 0,08 1 ÖZBEKİSTAN CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 1 Toplam Seçmen : 866 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 AK PARTİ : % NaN 0 MHP : % NaN 0 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 CHP : % NaN 0 SAADET PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 İYİ PARTİ : % NaN 0 HÜDA PAR : % NaN 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 HDP : % NaN 0 POLONYA CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 3 Toplam Seçmen : 3.980 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 AK PARTİ : % NaN 0 MHP : % NaN 0 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 CHP : % NaN 0 SAADET PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 İYİ PARTİ : % NaN 0 HÜDA PAR : % NaN 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 HDP : % NaN 0 ROMANYA Toplam Sandık : 8 Toplam Seçmen : 6.819 Açılan Sandık : 2 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 25 Kullanılan Oy : 571 Geçerli Oy : 568 Katılım Oranı : % 28,49 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 33,1 188 AK PARTİ : % 29,23 166 MHP : % 3,52 20 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 39,26 223 CHP : % 30,11 171 İYİ PARTİ : % 7,92 45 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 0,7 4 HÜDA PAR : % 0 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,18 1 HDP : % 27,46 156 RUSYA FEDERASYONU Toplam Sandık : 14 Toplam Seçmen : 11.350 Açılan Sandık : 2 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 14,29 Kullanılan Oy : 497 Geçerli Oy : 495 Katılım Oranı : % 24,1 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 23,84 118 AK PARTİ : % 17,78 88 MHP : % 5,86 29 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 52,93 262 CHP : % 40,4 200 İYİ PARTİ : % 11,11 55 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 1,41 7 HÜDA PAR : % 0 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,61 3 HDP : % 22,63 112 SIRBİSTAN CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 1 Toplam Seçmen : 571 Açılan Sandık : 1 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 100 Kullanılan Oy : 187 Geçerli Oy : 187 Katılım Oranı : % 32,75 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 24,06 45 AK PARTİ : % 17,11 32 MHP : % 5,88 11 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 57,75 108 CHP : % 42,78 80 İYİ PARTİ : % 13,37 25 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 0,53 1 HÜDA PAR : % 0,53 1 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,53 1 HDP : % 17,11 32 SİNGAPUR CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 1 Toplam Seçmen : 647 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 AK PARTİ : % NaN 0 MHP : % NaN 0 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 CHP : % NaN 0 SAADET PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 İYİ PARTİ : % NaN 0 HÜDA PAR : % NaN 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 HDP : % NaN 0 SUDAN CUMHURİYETİ Toplam Sandık : 2 Toplam Seçmen : 924 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 AK PARTİ : % NaN 0 MHP : % NaN 0 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 CHP : % NaN 0 SAADET PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 İYİ PARTİ : % NaN 0 HÜDA PAR : % NaN 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 HDP : % NaN 0 SUUDİ ARABİSTAN KRALLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 20 Toplam Seçmen : 23.552 Açılan Sandık : 3 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 15 Kullanılan Oy : 932 Geçerli Oy : 920 Katılım Oranı : % 26,48 Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % 49,89 459 AK PARTİ : % 45,22 416 MHP : % 4,35 40 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % 39,67 365 CHP : % 36,52 336 İYİ PARTİ : % 1,96 18 SAADET PARTİSİ : % 1,09 10 HÜDA PAR : % 0 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % 0,22 2 HDP : % 10,22 94 TAYLAND KRALLIĞI Toplam Sandık : 1 Toplam Seçmen : 883 Açılan Sandık : 0 Açılan Sandık Oranı : % 0 Kullanılan Oy : 0 Geçerli Oy : 0 Katılım Oranı : % NaN Oy Oranı Oy Sayısı CUMHUR İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 AK PARTİ : % NaN 0 MHP : % NaN 0 MİLLET İTTİFAKI : % NaN 0 CHP : % NaN 0 SAADET PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 İYİ PARTİ : % NaN 0 HÜDA PAR : % NaN 0 VATAN PARTİSİ : % NaN 0 HDP : % NaN 0 TÜRKMENİSTAN

JTA: The Candidates’ Stances on Israel Report by JTA: “Ahead of the Iowa caucus: A Jewish guide to the presidential candidates” On Monday, Iowans will gather to launch the 2016 presidential election with an arcane ritual — the caucus. In living rooms and meeting halls throughout the state, caucus-goers will group themselves into clusters according to which presidential candidate they favor. By the end of the day, two real-life winners will emerge: not a “leader in the polls,” not a “likely front-runner,” but the Democrat and Republican who will have secured Iowa’s delegation to the parties’ respective conventions in the summer. Iowa’s delegates, which come as a bloc, account for just 1 percent or so of the national total. But their selections will be the first substantive results in what has been a raucous and unpredictable campaign, rife with speculation, especially on the Republican side. A week and a day later, voters in New Hampshire will cast ballots in a more straightforward process, and by the late hours of Feb. 9, the race will truly be on – with the media in hot pursuit. At JTA, the question is what it has been for nearly a century: What does all this mean for the Jews? In that spirit, here’s a look at the leading candidates – their Jewish friends, family, advisers and donors, their stances on Israel and their Jewish-related controversies. THE REPUBLICANS Donald Trump, 68, real estate magnate, reality TV star Jewish cohorts Trump’s daughter, Ivanka, is married to Jared Kushner, the Jewish publisher of the New York Observer and, like her, the child of a real estate magnate. She underwent an Orthodox conversion before marrying, and the couple are raising their children Jewish. Donald Trump, a billionaire with a natural gift for generating free publicity, has yet to tap major donors, but given his New York origins and his professional fields – real estate and show business – it’s not surprising that some of his closest associates are Jewish. One of his leading proxies in the media is Michael Cohen, the Trump Organization’s Jewish executive vice president. Stance on Israel Trump, who as a negotiator made his name playing his cards close to the chest, declined last month to commit to recognizing all of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, explaining that doing so could preempt any bid for Israeli-Palestinian peace. That earned him boos at the Republican Jewish Coalition presidential forum. This month, he said he would move the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem. Like the other GOP candidates, he does not like the Iran deal, but he is one of several who has refused to say he would scrap it outright. He also wondered at the RJC event whether Israel has the “commitment” to make peace. Controversy Trump’s Republic Jewish Coalition forum appearance made headlines less for his refusal to embrace right-wing pro-Israel doctrine than for his joshing with the audience about how skilled everyone in the room was at making money. He likes compliments, and has retweeted flattery, even when it seemingly comes from white supremacists. He has also slipped a couple Nazi symbols into tweets, before pulling the posts down and claiming oversights. He has also achieved the neat trick of uniting pretty much the entire Jewish spectrum in condemnation of his proposals to ban Muslim entry into the United States, shut down some mosques and create a Muslim registry. READ: When it comes to Jewish ties, no GOP candidate trumps Trump Ted Cruz, 45, Texas senator Jewish cohorts Much has been written in recent days about the four billionaires funding Cruz’s insurgent candidacy; none of them are Jewish. But Sheldon Adelson, the casino magnate and GOP kingmaker, says he and his wife have yet to settle on a candidate, and while Adelson favors Marco Rubio, Miriam Adelson favors Cruz. Cruz has not shied from cultivating Jewish fundraisers. He made headlines last spring when, despite his strongly conservative bona fides, he met with two Jewish and gay hoteliers. The “gay” part is what made headlines, but the hoteliers’ pro-Israel interests is what led to the meeting. Cruz’s point man in the Jewish community is Nick Muzin, a rising young political player and an Orthodox Jew. Stance on Israel Cruz says he would scrap the Iran nuclear deal and move the embassy to Jerusalem as soon as he enters office. He says he also would invite Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to attend his first State of the Union address. Cruz has cultivated the pro-Israel right, appearing at Zionist Organization of American events and organizing an anti-Iran rally on Capitol Hill last summer. Controversy Cruz has taken to bashing neoconservatives, blaming them for for overseas interventions – including the Iraq War – that he says have weakened America. He also has insistently disparaged “New York values.” Some see his references to both groups – neoconservatives and New Yorkers – as coded attacks on the Jews. His supporters cry nonsense, saying his issue is with policy and values. READ: Ted Cruz aims to liberate GOP from ‘crazy’ neoconservatives Marco Rubio, 44, Florida senator Jewish cohorts Norman Braman, a South Florida car retailer, has been Rubio’s principal backer since his days in the Florida Legislature and employs Rubio’s wife, Jeanette Rubio, at his family’s charitable foundation. Sheldon Adelson is said to favor Rubio, although he has yet to commit, and late last year, Rubio secured the backing of Paul Singer, a hedge fund billionaire who is deeply involved in pro-Israel funding. As far as those neocons Cruz is running away from, Rubio says bring them on and seeks their advice. He has consulted with prominent Jewish thinkers and Republican administration veterans Elliott Abrams, Robert Kagan and Eric Edelman. He also has met with Henry Kissinger, President Richard Nixon’s secretary of state. Stance on Israel Rubio says he would move the embassy to Jerusalem and scrap the Iran deal. His campaign website has an Israel page, and it faithfully reflects right-wing pro-Israel talking points. Controversy Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the Jewish chair of the Democratic National Committee, slammed Rubio for attending a fundraiser at the home of Harlan Crow, who collects Nazi art. Rubio fired back with outrage of his own, and by most accounts came out on top in the exchange. READ: Rubio pledges Israel trip would be first presidential visit abroad Jeb Bush, 62, former Florida governor Jewish cohorts More than any other candidate, Bush has garnered the support of the Jewish Republicans who backed his brother President George W. Bush. Among donors, these include Fred Zeidman, a Texas businessman, and Mel Sembler, a Florida real estate magnate. Jeb Bush’s advisers include some of the most senior Jewish veterans of the second Bush administration, including former Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff and former Attorney General Michael Mukasey. Stance on Israel Bush also has said he will move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, but like several candidates who strongly oppose the Iran nuclear deal, he says it would likely be too late to scrap it by the time the next president assumes office. Controversy Bush raised conservative pro-Israel hackles when he named his father’s secretary of state James Baker as an adviser. Baker has clashed with Israel and the Jewish community. It didn’t help when within a month of coming on board with Jeb Bush, Baker addressed J Street, the liberal Jewish Middle East policy group, and extolled the virtues of pressuring Israel. Bush has said that while he values Baker’s deep reservoirs of experience – overall, the George H. W. Bush presidency is considered a foreign policy success story – he does not look to him for Israel advice. READ: On foreign policy, Jeb Bush navigates between brother and father Ben Carson, 64, retired neurosurgeon, best-selling author Jewish cohorts Among Carson’s foreign policy advisers is George Birnbaum, who served as chief of staff for Netanyahu during his first term, from 1996 to 1999, and has been a partner to Arthur Finkelstein, the GOP public relations guru and political wizard who also has advised Netanyahu. In speaking of anyone advising Carson, especially on foreign policy, there is an enormous caveat: He does not like taking advice, and some of his advisers have, on the record, called him out on it – extraordinary, if not unprecedented, during a presidential campaign. Stance on Israel Carson has said he will abandon the Iran deal and has accused the Obama administration of abandoning Israel. But in real time, he seems less than familiar with the country and the challenges it faces. At the Republican Jewish Coalition forum, he mangled the pronunciation of “Hamas,” making it sound like “hummus.” More substantively, the speech he delivered – awkwardly, from notes – appeared to suggest that if only Fatah and Hamas learned to get along, peace would be achievable. Controversy Carson earned rebukes from much of the Jewish establishment last year when he suggested that gun control was in part responsible for the Holocaust. He refused to stand down. READ: Ben Carson is a Seventh-day Adventist. Here’s why it matters John Kasich, 63, Ohio governor Jewish cohorts Kasich has friends of longstanding in Ohio’s Jewish community, including Brad Kastan, a financial advisor; Albert Ratner, the scion of a family of Ohio real estate magnates; Gary Heiman, a textile industry executive, and Jay Schottenstein, whose family is listed as the 100th most wealthy by Forbes for its fashion business. The state’s governor delivered an emotional eulogy at the 2014 funeral of Gordon Zacks, heir to a footwear fortune and a prominent pro-Israel advocate who hosted Kasich on an Israel tour. A congressman from 1983-2001, Kasich is friendly with Natan Sharansky, the former Soviet dissident and now the chairman of the Jewish Agency for Israel, and frequently drops his name. Kasich pushed for the building of a Holocaust memorial in Columbus, the state capital. Stance on Israel Kasich, like the other Republicans in the race, has blamed the Obama administration for the tensions between the governments; unlike many of the others, he has not committed to moving the embassy to Jerusalem, and has said that scrapping the Iran nuclear plan would be foolish, however misbegotten it is. Controversy Kasich, addressing the Republican Jewish Coalition forum, delivered an encomium to Jewish friendship that may have seemed in place among his many Jewish friends in Ohio, but that raised eyebrows as trading in stereotypes – however flattering — in a national setting. “My mother told me one time, I was a very young man, she said, ‘Johnny if you want to look for a very good friend, get somebody who’s Jewish,’” he said. He has also proposed creating a “Department of Judeo-Christian Values,” while struggling to explain what that means, and has taken to berating Jewish reporters about their shul attendance. Chris Christie, 53, New Jersey governor Jewish cohorts C’mon – he’s from Jersey! Seriously, Christie’s best-known Jewish connection is also notorious for being the wealthiest Jewish Wall Streeter who does not give to Jewish causes: Hedge Fund billionaire Steven A. Cohen, who is one of Christie’s national finance chairmen. Other national finance chairmen include Jeff Fox of St. Louis, whose father, Sam Fox, was a major George W. Bush backer and a past chairman of the Republican Jewish Coalition; and Bill Kilberg of the Washington suburbs in northern Virginia, a major donor to the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Stance on Israel Christie, like every other GOP candidate, says Obama has poisoned the relationship, and this month promised that one of his first acts as president would be to squirrel Netanyahu away for a weekend and let him vent about the previous eight years. He has said he would also ask his aides how best to get out of the Iran nuclear deal. Controversy Christie, speaking in Las Vegas in 2014 to the Republican Jewish Coalition, used the term “occupied territories.” Mort Klein, the Zionist Organization of America president, upbraided him for the heresy on the spot, and later the same day, Christie apologized to Adelson, whose Venetian resort hotel was the venue for the event. THE DEMOCRATS Bernie Sanders, 74, Vermont senator Jewish cohorts Sanders is Jewish and spent time on a kibbutz with his first (Jewish) wife, although which kibbutz, no one has been able to determine, despite arduous efforts by Jewish journalists. Not long after his Israel sojourn, Sanders moved to Vermont, where he became best friends with two Jewish guys – philosopher Richard Sugarman [who is, reportedly, an “unapologetic Zionist” who is , “left of center on every issue ‘except Israel’.”] and Huck Gutman, a professor of literature at the University of Vermont with a fondness for Yehuda Amichai [an Israeli poet who fought in several of Israel’s wars]. Stance on Israel Since his days as mayor of Burlington in the 1980s, Sanders has been unstinting both in his criticism of Israel’s policies toward the Palestinians and his support of Israel’s right to exist and defend itself. He backed the Iran nuclear deal. Controversy Sanders’ older brother, Larry, based in Oxford, England, last year tweeted “yes” to whether he supports the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, or BDS, against Israel and favors dismantling Israel’s weapons of mass destruction. Bernie Sanders’ campaign won’t comment, but, brothers, right? [Much more at Where does Bernie Sanders, the Jewish candidate for president, stand on Israel? At a town hall in Cabot, Vermont, during last summer’s Gaza war, a constituent commended Sanders for not signing onto a Senate resolution that solely blamed Hamas for the conflict, but wondered if he would “go further.” “Has Israel overreacted? Have they bombed U.N. facilities? The answer is yes, and that is terribly, terribly wrong,” Sanders said. “On the other hand – and there is another hand – you have a situation where Hamas is sending missiles into Israel – a fact – and you know where some of those missiles are coming from. They’re coming from populated areas; that’s a fact. Hamas is using money that came into Gaza for construction purposes – and God knows they need roads and all the things that they need – and used some of that money to build these very sophisticated tunnels into Israel for military purposes.” Hecklers interrupted, some shouting epithets. “Excuse me, shut up, you don’t have the microphone,” Sanders said. “You asked the question, I’m answering it. This is called democracy. I am answering a question and I do not want to be disturbed.” As mayor of Burlington, Vermont, in 1988, Sanders was asked if he backed then-candidate for president Jesse Jackson’s support for the Palestinians during the first intifada. Sanders excoriated what he depicted as Israeli brutality as well as Arab extremism. “What is going on in the Middle East right now is obviously a tragedy, there’s no question about it. The sight of Israeli soldiers breaking the arms and legs of Arabs is reprehensible. The idea of Israel closing down towns and sealing them off is unacceptable,” he said at a news conference, according to video unearthed by Alternet writer Zaid Jilani. “You have had a crisis there for 30 years, you have had people at war for 30 years, you have a situation with some Arab countries where there are still some Arab leadership calling for the destruction of the State of Israel and the murder of Israeli citizens.” Sanders said the United States should exercise the prerogative it has as an economic power. “We are pouring billions of dollars in arms into Arab countries. We have the clout to demand they and Israel, who we’re also heavily financing, to begin to sit down and work out a sensible solution to the problem which would guarantee the existence of the State of Israel and which would also protect Palestinian rights,” he said.] READ: The Jewish Bernie Sanders only Vermonters know Hillary Rodham Clinton, former secretary of state, former senator from New York, former first lady Jewish cohorts Like Trump, Clinton has a Jewish son-in-law, Marc Mezvinsky, an investment banker whose mother, Marjorie Margolies-Mezvinsky, then a Democratic congresswoman from Pennsylvania, provided the critical vote in 1993 that passed President Bill Clinton’s first budget. In Clinton’s world, with its layers of loyalties, this is as tight as it gets. [Chelsea’s father-in-law was served five years in prison for a “Nigerian” scam]. Bill and Hillary Clinton were accruing Jewish fans even before they moved to Arkansas as a couple. Bill Clinton had a Jewish fan base as the state’s governor and attracted Jewish supporters when he ran for president in 1992, many who remain loyal to Hillary Clinton. She also has cornered the party’s Jewish fundraisers, and her rival for Jewish loyalty in 2009, Barack Obama, has given his blessing to his Jewish supporters to back Clinton this election. Her most prominent backer may be Haim Saban, the Israeli-American entertainment magnate. One of her closest and most loyal advisers is Martin Indyk, whom she met during her husband’s presidential campaign when Indyk headed the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a think tank he had spun off from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Indyk, a veteran of the failed Israeli-Palestinian peace efforts of both the Clinton and Obama administrations, is now vice president at the Brookings Institution. Stance on Israel Clinton has ties with Israel dating back to her days as first lady of Arkansas, when she adopted an Israeli early education program for the state. Since quitting as Obama’s first secretary of state, she has broadly embraced his quest for Israeli-Palestinian peace as well as his Iran policy – indeed, she now credits herself as one of the architects of both policies – but she has also emphasized subtle differences. Clinton has suggested she was not comfortable with making settlements a key point of contention between the Obama and Netanyahu governments, and she says she would closely monitor Iran’s compliance with the nuclear deal. Controversy Despite her closeness to Israel, Clinton’s decades in the spotlight mean every inflection has come under microscopic examination. Paul Fray, who managed her husband’s failed 1974 congressional race, says she called him a “f—ing Jew bastard” on election night, although he also acknowledges the Clintons did not know at the time that he was one-eighth Jewish. The Clintons deny any such exchange. Clinton was the first official in her husband’s government to speak openly about the prospect of a Palestinian state. As first lady, Clinton embraced Suha Arafat, the wife of the late PLO leader Yasser Arafat, after Suha Arafat delivered a speech accusing Israel of poisoning children. Clinton, who was listening to a simultaneous translation, claims she missed that passage. When last year, Clinton’s private emails were dumped as part of an investigation into her privacy practices while she was secretary of state, it was revealed that one of her Jewish advisers, Sidney Blumenthal, to whom she remains fiercely loyal, kept sending her anti-Israel screeds by his son, Max. Clinton occasionally complimented Max Blumenthal’s writing to Sidney – but there is no evidence she took any of his son’s advice. READ: Throughout Hillary Clinton’s life and career, US Jews have been close at hand THE UNLIKELYS Rick Santorum, former Republican Senator for Pennsylvania, talked Iran sanctions way before it was fashionable, but on Muslims, is even more prone than Trump to sweeping generalizations. Carly Fiorina, the former Hewlett Packard CEO, and a Republican, at times sounds like she has Netanyahu on speed dial, but has also been in the sticky position of defending HP sales to Iran. Mike Huckabee, the former Republican Arkansas governor, is perhaps the candidate who has most frequently visited Israel, leading tours there for evangelical Christians. He is also probably the most pronouncedly opposed candidate to a two-state solution, and is unafraid of Holocaust metaphors to attack his opponents. Jim Gilmore, the former Virginia governor, a Republican, answered the kishkes question and also took a crash course on Holocaust films. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., began his congressional career calling for cuts in defense assistance to Israel, but then got himself some Talmud study. Martin O’Malley, the former Democratic governor of Maryland, signed bills sanctioning Iran and conditioning business with a French rail company on its accounting for its Nazi-era collaboration. He is backed by Howard Friedman, a past American Israel Public Affairs Committee president.

New York (CNN Business) On Sunday, Ford will announce what is possibly the biggest change ever in the 55-year history of the Mustang. The automaker will unveil a vehicle bearing the Mustang brand that's not a two-door car. Called the Ford Mustang Mach-E, it's a fully electric crossover SUV that will wear the Mustang's chrome pony. Ford has apparently learned from brands like Porsche, Lamborghini and Jeep that even ardent fans will forgive the use of a brand name on a once-unthinkable type of vehicle. That's as long as the new vehicle maintains some core aspects of the original and as long as the original vehicle that made the brand carries on as well. Ford provided this teaser image of the crossover SUV before Sunday's launch. For instance, Porsche fans were once outraged by the Cayenne SUV . But because Porsche still makes sports cars like the 911 and the Cayenne can credibly claim to be "the Porsche of SUVs," the brand remains strong. Likewise, Jeep has been able to make crossover SUVs that will rarely leave pavement as long as those crossovers are available in tough "Trail Rated" versions and Jeep keeps making the ultra-rugged Wrangler. Read More

Story highlights Toys "R" Us Canada is searching for a new chief play officer Alex Thorne, 13, is stepping down (CNN) Retirement isn't usually part of a growing child's life, but Alex Thorne's life is far from ordinary. Come December 31, Alex will not only be celebrating his 14th birthday, he's stepping down from his position as chief play officer for Toys "R" Us Canada. Alex, of Pickering, Ontario, became the fourth kid to take the job of CPO after winning a competition in 2013 organized by the Canadian division of the toy company. During his tenure, Alex has played with "hundreds and hundreds" of toys, deciding what's hot and what's not in toys targeting all age groups and genders. Alex Thorne has held the tough job of chief play officer for Toys "R" Us Canada. "There are some toys I test that are really for toddlers so, personally, they don't appeal to me. But I can definitely see how I would like them if I was younger," he said. Read More

British scientists have identified a way in which Salmonella, the bacteria that cause typhoid fever and gastroenteritis, inactivate immune defenses in human cells. One way in which human cells fight off infections is by engulfing the smaller bacterial cells and then attacking them with toxic enzymes contained in small packets called lysosomes. Lysosomes constantly need to be replenished with fresh enzymes that are generated from a factory within human cells. These enzymes are carried from the factory along a dedicated transport pathway. After dropping off new enzymes at lysosomes, the transport carriers are sent back to the factory to pick up new enzymes. A study, published in the journal Science, shows that Salmonella protects itself from this attack by depleting the supply of toxic enzymes. The researchers found that after Salmonella bacteria have been engulfed by the cell, but before they are killed, Salmonella injects a protein that prevents the cell from recycling the transport carriers between the factory and the lysosome. This means that Salmonella effectively cuts off the supply line of the enzymes that would otherwise kill it. As a result, the enzymes get re-routed out of the cell and the lysosomes lose their potency. Salmonella is then able to exploit the disarmed lysosomes by feeding off the nutrients they contain. “This seems to be a very effective way for these harmful bacteria to interfere with our cell’s defense mechanisms, and then exploit the defective lysosomes to their own benefit,” explained Prof David Holden of the Imperial College London’s Department of Medicine and MRC Center for Molecular Bacteriology and Infection, senior author of the study. “Our challenge now is to understand in greater detail how the injected Salmonella protein works at the molecular level, and to exploit our findings to develop more effective vaccines. This is especially important since many Salmonella strains are now resistant to antibiotics,” Prof Holden concluded. _______ Bibliographic information: Kieran McGourty et al. Salmonella Inhibits Retrograde Trafficking of Mannose-6-Phosphate Receptors and Lysosome Function. Science, vol. 338, no. 6109, pp. 963-967; doi: 10.1126/science.1227037

Retro futuristic UI/Data design concept inspired by sci-fi movies and video games of the 80’s based off the Swiss grid system.

Democrat Andrew Gillum is the first black nominee from any major party for governor of Florida. | Mike Stocker/South Florida Sun-Sentinel via AP elections Gillum hits back at Trump after president calls him ‘a thief’ Tallahassee Mayor and Florida gubernatorial candidate Andrew Gillum hit back at President Donald Trump on Monday, after Trump called Gillum a “thief” in an inflammatory tweet. “In Florida there is a choice between a Harvard/Yale educated man named @RonDeSantisFL who has been a great Congressman and will be a great Governor - and a Dem who is a thief and who is Mayor of poorly run Tallahassee, said to be one of the most corrupt cities in the Country!” Trump tweeted on Monday morning, without providing any evidence of crimes. Soon after, Gillum called out Trump on Twitter. “On Twitter there is a choice between having the courage to @ the person you are trash talking, or not. @realDonaldTrump is howling because he’s weak. Florida, go vote today.” On Twitter there is a choice between having the courage to @ the person you are trash talking, or not. @realDonaldTrump is howling because he's weak. Florida, go vote today. https://t.co/I8uOokptJA — Andrew Gillum (@AndrewGillum) October 29, 2018 The race for Florida’s governor is one of several nationally watched elections this November. Gillum is the first black nominee from any major party for governor of Florida, and discussions of race and corruption have figured prominently in the election. Trump’s tweet comes as a federal corruption probe circles Tallahassee, and DeSantis has frequently accused Gillum of improperly receiving gifts while mayor. Morning Score newsletter Your guide to the permanent campaign — weekday mornings, in your inbox. Email Sign Up By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. DeSantis has been accused of exploiting coded racist language during his campaign, and Gillum accused Republicans of thinly veiled racist language when tying him to the corruption probe. DeSantis has also been criticized for failing to disclose all records related to more than $145,000 in taxpayer money he used to fund travel as a congressman, the Naples Daily News reported.

Splendid Superslut Practices A Rock Hard Sausage In Her Gash. A domme of virtuous dt displays all nestling’s were given and will get pummeled through a massive sausage.

Komend jaar moet het de Piratenpartij eindelijk lukken om de felbegeerde Tweede Kamerzetel binnen te halen. Dat is het algemene gevoel bij het tweedaagse congres dit weekeinde van de partij. “Er is nu echt meer aandacht voor privacy dan een paar jaar geleden”, zegt Dave Borghuis uit Enschede, die zondag een plekje op de kandidatenlijst hoopt te krijgen. Hij noemt de namen van Edward Snowden en Julian Assange, die op de shirts van menig Piraat langskomen. De partij heeft zich ook verbreed, vindt Borghuis. “Ons programma is inmiddels breder dan dat van de PVV”. Een andere troefkaart: lijsttrekker Ancilla van de Leest. Dit 31-jarige voormalig fotomodel trad de afgelopen maanden al veelvuldig op in de media en “kan ons verhaal goed voor het voetlicht brengen”, aldus Borghuis. Vlak voor aanvang zijn in evenementencentrum NUtrecht de voorbereidingen op het congres van de Piratenpartij Nederland nog in volle gang. Een klein clubje vrijwilligers versiert kraampjes met donkerpaarse Piratenvlaggen. Links in een hoekje zitten een aantal jongens achter hun laptops mee te doen aan een hackathon, een online evenement waarin softwareontwikkelaars ideeën uitwisselen. Het is voor het eerst in haar zesjarige geschiedenis dat de Piratenpartij een heus partijcongres organiseert. De partij, die zich met name profileert op privacy en digitale veiligheid, doet bij de Tweede Kamerverkiezingen van maart aanstaande voor de derde keer een gooi naar een zetel. Bij de verkiezingen van 2010 en 2012 kwam de partij, die internationaal in verschillende (regio)parlementen is vertegenwoordigd, stemmen tekort. De Piraten kregen vier jaar geleden ruim 30.000 stemmen, wat toen bijna de helft was van het aantal stemmen dat nodig was voor een zetel. In 2014 slaagde de partij erin een zetel te winnen in stadsdeel Amsterdam-West en kreeg daarmee voor het eerst een vertegenwoordiger in de Nederlandse politiek. Maar in de huidige landelijke peilingen staat de partij op nul zetels. Rien Zilvold Op het congres komen op deze eerste dag naar schatting zo’n honderd tot honderdvijftig man af. De partij heeft bij aanvang van het congres 917 leden. Onder de aanwezigen zijn allerlei soorten mensen: mannen op leeftijd met brillen en lang haar - types die je wellicht bij de Piratenpartij verwacht - en vooral veel jonge mensen, van hacker tot student. Er zijn allerlei workshops en lezingen over onderwerpen zo divers als het vrijhandelsverdrag TTIP, illegaliteit en het octrooirecht. Verder stelden de leden aan het einde van de zaterdag het verkiezingsprogramma vast, waarna - hoe kan het anders - Piraatbier wordt gedronken. ‘Voor een vrije informatiesamenleving’ Dat programma focust inderdaad sterk op privacy en digitale burgerrechten. De Piratenpartij wil een verbod op de ongevraagde verkoop van persoonlijke informatie, het stopzetten van preventief fouilleren en minder cameratoezicht. Het bestuur moet transparanter worden gemaakt door het openbaar maken van alle overheidsdocumentatie en de partij, die de slogan ‘Voor een vrije informatiesamenleving voert’, wil meer rechtstreekse invloed van de burger op de politiek door online inspraakfora en burgertoppen. De Piraten zijn verder voor het hervormen van het auteursrecht en staan ook voor een zeer liberaal drugsbeleid en willen legalisering van softdrugs en regulering van de productie en handel in andere drugs. Opinieonderzoeker Peter Kanne, werkzaam voor peilingbureau I&O Research, denkt dat de Piratenpartij met hun thema’s “een onderstroom in de samenleving te pakken hebben”. Hij zegt in een telefoongesprek daags voor het congres dat de partij zeker een zetel kan halen, maar denkt dat zij “een digitale ramp nodig hebben om door te breken”. “Mensen voelen de gebrekkige digitale veiligheid te weinig aan den lijve”, aldus de onderzoeker. Dat de partij vooral om één onderwerp draait is juist goed volgens Kanne, die wijst op partijen als 50Plus en de Partij voor de Dieren. Maar een breed thema als digitale veiligheid is niet altijd even makkelijk te politiseren, zegt Kanne. “Je hebt ook een leider nodig die dat in goede soundbites kan vatten”. ‘Crisis achter de rug’ Die taak is de komende maanden weggelegd voor de in juni gekozen lijsttrekker Ancilla van de Leest. Zij kreeg een paar weken geleden haar vuurdoop toen het partijbestuur uit onvrede over haar leiderschapsstijl opstapte en lid werd van Forum voor Democratie, de nieuwe partij van publicist Thierry Baudet. Van de Leest kreeg het verwijt het partijbestuur buitenspel te zetten en alles binnen de partij met haar eigen vertrouwelingen te bepalen. De lijsttrekker wuift de kritiek op het congres weg. “Zij zijn gevraagd te vertrekken, we hebben dit probleem met z’n allen opgelost. Deze crisis is achter de rug”, aldus Van de Leest in een interview op het congres. De lijsttrekker heeft zin in de campagne en denkt dat drie Kamerzetels haalbaar is en gaat uit van minstens één. “Het is vooral zaak onze achterban te mobiliseren en dat we ons verder richten op mensen die nu niet stemmen omdat ze teleurgesteld zijn in de huidige politiek.” Kanne geeft de mediagenieke Van de Leest een goede kans. “Het is wel zaak de Piraten nu de rijen sluiten, je moet niet blijven ruziën. Anders kun je als kleine partij wel inpakken.”

Save on the full suite 65% discount 10 engines 22 expansions Arm yourself with the full arsenal. Buy or upgrade to all of our non-subscription engines, effects, and expansions and SAVE MORE THAN 65%

Check out our new site Makeup Addiction add your own caption add your own caption add your own caption add your own caption add your own caption add your own caption add your own caption add your own caption add your own caption add your own caption add your own caption Sees city government tweet about dui checkpoint Sends out mass text alerting stoner friends

The Ghosts of Flight 191 Judith and Sheldon Wax were local literary figures — she an author, he a top editor at Playboy. Forty years ago this month, they and 269 other people boarded a plane to Los Angeles. What happened next haunts Chicago to this day. As the plane plunged downward, it kept rotating — past the point of perpendicular, 112 degrees now — toward a sickening almost belly-up position. Twenty seconds into the flight, Dillard’s earlier decision to decrease speed — as called for in such emergencies — had unintentionally put the plane into a stall. Slowly, the plane began to rotate to the left 60 degrees, then a full 90 degrees, as the seat-belted passengers tilted atop one another. In the tower, Rucker was less understated. “Look at this! Look at this!” he shouted to others in the control room, his voice captured on his headset radio. “He blew up an engine! Equipment. We need equipment. He blew an engine.” Knowing he’d lost one of his three engines but unable to see precisely what had happened, Dillard slowed the aircraft and put it into a steep climb. For a few moments, the wings leveled, and then … Watching from an O’Hare tower, Edward Rucker, the air traffic controller charged with tracking 191’s departure, had noticed something both extraordinary and terrifying just before takeoff: The jet’s left engine had broken loose, tumbled over one of the wings, then smashed onto the runway with a bounce and a skid. A failure analyst for Standard Oil, Warke was also a shutterbug. He had his 35 mm camera on his lap, figuring he might snap a few photos of planes taking off. Spotting Flight 191 starting its run, he brought the camera to his eye. As the jumbo jet accelerated, he saw a flash, followed by a trail of white smoke pouring from the plane as it neared liftoff. What was that? he wondered. Did that jet just hit a vehicle? Something had happened. The jet, now almost 7,000 feet down the runway, heaved itself sluggishly into the air. Warke started clicking his camera. For a few moments, it looked like everything was OK. The jet’s wings leveled as it climbed to a few hundred feet. But when it began to bank severely, Warke knew the plane was damaged and in trouble. He could barely speak. Almost simultaneously, on a runway nearby, William Warke’s flight was touching down. From his window seat, he watched the landscape spool by: the crisscrossing runways and darting luggage trucks, the beacon-waving ground crew, earmuffs clamped to their heads. At 3:01 p.m., the DC-10 paused for an incoming plane. A minute later, Walter Lux, the 52-year-old captain, got the go-ahead to take off: The DC-10’s engines whined to life, the metallic shriek rising and falling like the revving of an enormous dental drill. Eleven minutes behind schedule for a 2:45 p.m. departure, the plane pushed back from the gate, then bumped across the bridge spanning O’Hare’s access road. The plane nosed its way to the end of its assigned runway, 32 Right, and there stood trembling with restrained power. In addition to Shel and Judy, two other Playboy staffers had decided to take American Flight 191 that afternoon. One was Mary Sheridan, a director with the company’s international publications division. The other was fiction editor Vicky Chen Haider. It would be one of first times she’d be away from her 1-year-old son, Sean, who was with her husband, Syed, visiting family in Texas. Also on the flight: music manager Leonard Stogel, who handled the Cowsills and Tommy James and the Shondells, among other groups; scientist Itzhak “Ben” Bentov, inventor of the steerable cardiac catheter; and Francis Gemme, president of Children’s Press in Chicago. And so it was on a clear, bright Friday that the couple arrived at O’Hare International Airport. They checked their bags, walked together to Gate K-5, and, along with 256 other passengers, buckled into their bucket seats, which were arranged mostly in rows of nine, broken up by two aisles, in the wide-bodied jumbo jet. “Watch,” he replied. “It just makes me nervous. I think this is an invention we could do without.” Shel wasn’t as nervous about flying as his wife, but he wasn’t entirely comfortable either, despite having frequently made the trip from Chicago to L.A. to huddle with Hef and scout new writing talent. He confessed as much to Tribune columnist Bob Greene, whom Shel once ran into on a flight home. When the captain would click on his mic and invite passengers to watch the takeoff on a closed-circuit screen at the front of the cabin, as American Airlines did in those days, Shel would look away. Ensconced in a Victorian townhouse on North Cleveland Avenue, they were not a socialite couple. The closest they came was Judy’s lunches at the Brewery on Broadway with a group of friends who called themselves — “with conscious irony” — the Old Girls’ Network. Nor did the Waxes consider themselves a literary power couple — though Shel saw his position as managing editor at Playboy, where “he was a traffic cop over a bunch of very talented, unruly editors” as his dream job, says Barbara Nellis, one of those editors. He had joined the magazine in 1960, at the start of its heyday, working as an associate editor before becoming managing editor in 1972. The day of the L.A. flight, Shel, ever scrupulous, called one of the Playboy staffers, David Standish, just before leaving for the airport, a last-second prodding of the articles editor to make deadline on a story. They were married within two years. He was cerebral: “His idea of passionate declaration is, ‘I like you more than life itself,’ ” wrote Judy. She, on the other hand, ran hot, given at times to “virulent attacks of sentimentality.” For one of the couple’s annual Valentine’s Day parties, she dressed their dog as Cupid. For herself, she created a red-and-white ruffle-necked dress, complete with an “under-the-bosom sash that cries out for Tricia Nixon.” Shel (“my wise-ass valentine”) suggested hanging her in the window so guests could play “Guess Which Is the Hostess and Which Are the Draperies.” They had met in 1949 when Judy was an 18-year-old freshman at Syracuse University and Shel was a senior, a 22-year-old ex-GI from Brooklyn “whose eyebrows,” Judy marveled, “looked just like Tyrone Power’s.” They were in love from the start, partly because of their shared intellectual tastes. (“Went out with someone WONDERFUL! His name is Sheldon Wax, and we talked about Khafke all evening!” Judy wrote on a postcard to her mother, apparently too excited to spell the absurdist novelist’s name correctly.) Judith Wax, snooper, mother, dreamer, wore a bob with bangs that framed a face bearing a resemblance to one of her contemporaries, Jane Fonda. “Voracious, greedy, insatiable, in the best sense of those words” is how one friend characterized her. And no doubt those qualities drew Sheldon to her. His silvered hair was habitually combed to the side, and his thick eyebrows and plump mustache contributed to his perpetual expression of wry amusement, which matched his buttoned-up, old-school, Elements of Style inclination. Shel, 51, could not have been more delighted by his wife’s late-blooming success as a writer. She scored big with her very first effort: a Chaucerian send-up of the Watergate scandal called “The Waterbury Tales.” Original and cleverly cutting, the piece was published in both Time and the New Republic, as well as newspapers around the country. She suddenly found herself in demand as an essayist, writing for publications ranging from the New York Times to Newsweek. The month before her trip to Los Angeles, she’d published the second of two articles for Chicago about her adventures as a serial eavesdropper, showcasing her witty, dexterous prose. “You’d hate dining out with me,” she wrote. “I am, it seems, consigned by an obsessional neurosis to go through life with my ear as the next table’s centerpiece.” Not to worry. Judy would go, despite feeling sick and despite suffering from a fear of flying so bad that her “head trembled,” as she described it, from takeoff to landing. This was too important. For the better part of two decades, she had longed to be a writer. Being a “hearthkeeper” (Judy’s word) and raising her two children, Claudia and Paul, had consumed much of her time. But it was her self-doubt that had kept her from doing, she stated in Starting in the Middle, “what I most feared, desperately wanted, and never had the nerve to try.” It had been only five years since she’d taken the leap: At age 42, when her son joined the Hare Krishna movement and her daughter went to college, Judy “went to the typewriter,” as she put it. Thus, the gentle encouragement of her friend Christine Newman over the phone that Thursday night: “You should go.” Newman would be there. A fact-checker at Playboy who would later work as a literary editor at Chicago magazine, Newman had booked a morning flight from Chicago to L.A. to beat the long registration lines and get the lay of the land before the conference started in the afternoon. Judith Wax felt under the weather. It was an unfortunate bit of timing, given her plans for the following afternoon, Friday, May 25, 1979. Along with her husband, Sheldon, she was taking a trip to Los Angeles for the American Booksellers Association convention, one of the biggest publishing events of the year. More important to her, she was not going as a plus-one of her beloved Shel, who, as managing editor of Playboy magazine, made the trip each year. At 47, she was going as a bona fide author with a bona fide hit of her own. Her first book, the memoir Starting in the Middle (a rumination on middle age that “polishes the pearls of anxiety,” as Kirkus Reviews described it), had been published just a few weeks earlier and had already earned a measure of commercial and critical success. Having ascended the local bestsellers list, it was beginning to attract national attention. Bidding for paperback rights had begun. In a frozen corner of a park at an intersection in Des Plaines, he stood blowing into his hands before a knee-high wall made of bricks, each of which bore a name — his friends, some of them. In the distance, blue-gray against the gauzy white of a February day, the long body of a passenger jet floated up like a phantom, nosing its way into the pale sky, climbing, climbing, and vanishing. But the man, hands in his pockets now, was looking down and didn’t notice. He was a ghost, in a way, the walking dead. Only he wasn’t dead, though he should have been, or would have been but for his own prescience. Laurence Gonzales was part of a new breed hired at Playboy — young, brash, aggressive. He wore bell-bottoms and open shirts, long hair and sideburns, a look that nettled Sheldon Wax — he of the crisply ironed white shirt and tie and the by-the-book grammar and the original “men’s entertainment” ethos that had formed the foundation of Hugh Hefner’s empire — but also amused him. “We all smoked dope and wore jeans,” recalls Standish, another in that group. “We were pushing for harder stories and pushing against Vietnam and [pressing for articles about] the sexual revolution and a lot of social and cultural issues that all of us in our early to mid-20s believed in.” Shel, he says, “would just look at us like, Oh God. But we were performing well enough that he liked our work. He just didn’t love our style.” Gonzales arrived as a 24-year-old staff writer in 1972, the year Shel became managing editor, and climbed the ladder to become articles editor. He left Playboy in 1978 to pursue writing full-time but still had a close relationship with the magazine and continued to write for it. In fact, it was Shel who urged Gonzales, who was 31 by now, to join him at the L.A. book conference. And Gonzales had good reason: His first book, Jambeaux, a novel loosely based on his experiences as a musician, was coming out that fall. Before Gonzales committed, however, he did what he always did: He looked up what type of jet they’d be flying. While at Playboy, Gonzales had become fascinated with airplane disasters — in particular, two involving McDonnell Douglas’s DC-10. One, just outside Paris in 1974, killed all 346 on board after a cargo door blew out, collapsing the cabin floor and severing the hydraulics that allowed the pilots to steer. A similar blowout had happened two years earlier, though that crippled plane was able to land. Gonzales’s interest stemmed from his father, Federico, the son of a Mexican immigrant who served as a B-17 bomber pilot during World War II. When the wing of his plane was shot off by German antiaircraft fire, 27,000 feet up in the air, he miraculously survived the crash, though most of his bones were broken and he was taken prisoner. His son was nevertheless drawn to the cockpit and started flying in 1973 — two years before he wrote his first piece on aviation safety for Playboy. He even trained as an instructor but never bothered to take the certification test. So the de facto expert’s response to Shel when he learned that Flight 191 was a DC-10? “I’m not going to get on that plane.” “You’ve been reading too much crap,” Shel said. What Gonzales had been reading about the DC-10 was not crap. Specifically, he’d learned how McDonnell Douglas was in dire financial straits and had set up an incentive program to save money at virtually any cost. No thanks. He’d stay home. That Friday afternoon in May 1979, Gonzales was giving a former Playboy colleague a lift when the first news report came over the radio: A plane had crashed not far from O’Hare. Gonzales raced home and turned on the television to discover that it was an American Airlines flight bound for Los Angeles. The fire was still raging at the crash site, a field in Des Plaines just behind a trailer park. “Holy shit,” Gonzales blurted to his wife. And then: “Was that the flight that Shel and Judy and Vicky and Mary were on?” Gonzales grabbed his car keys. Christine Newman, already in Los Angeles, was oblivious to the crash for much of the day — so much so that she didn’t notice that conference organizers had quietly taken down a poster for Judy’s book. When she finally made it to her hotel room, she turned on the TV. The images flickered by in an unending stream of horror: firefighters and rescue workers walking through a hellscape of smoking rubble, small red, yellow, and black flags flapping from four-foot-high metal stakes marking bodies and pieces of bodies. She felt a wave of shock, panic, disbelief, nausea, “like I was going insane,” she says. “When they started rolling the list of victims on TV, I just went berserk.” Judy. Shel. Dead. It just couldn’t be. The next thought: her parents. They would be wondering if she was on the flight. She picked up the hotel phone and dialed them in Tennessee. No, she told them, she had taken an earlier flight. She was alive. Flags marked the location of crash victims as firefighters searched the wreckage. Photo: Jay Needleman/Chicago Tribune Rushing to the scene in his BMW, Gonzales went first to the trailer park. News helicopters hovered overhead while rescue workers stood helplessly and ambulances waited for the nonexistent injured. Metal shards and flames had leveled one of the trailers, and Gonzales spotted a massive piece of the fuselage, taller than he was, in the middle of the street. A police car pulled up near him. Gonzales produced a press pass. “I’m here to report on this,” he told the officers. It was the truth. Already he knew he would be writing about the disaster. “Well, get in,” one of the officers said. “We’ll take you over to the crash site.” Soon, Gonzales was gazing out at what had once been a verdant field of grass and scrub oak and cornflowers, now a 100-yard-wide swath of scorched earth that looked like it had been leveled by a napalm strike. He spotted the half-collapsed husk of one of Flight 191’s engines, the silver and white of the turbine charred black. He saw the wheel assembly, likewise seared and smoldering. Mayor Jane Byrne described the crash scene as “probably the worst thing I’ve ever seen.” The smell of burning jet fuel and flesh, “like ancient lamp oil and burned insulation,” he would later write, filled his nostrils. Fire engines, their hoses deployed, appeared and vanished like giant red ghosts in the smoke. Every emergency vehicle within 50 miles must be here, he thought. By now, the fire was under control. He stayed just on the fringe, looking in disbelief and wondering, for the first time, how many had died on this spot. Hundreds. Including his friends. All there. In newsrooms around the country, the numbers coming in were grim: The crash had killed all 258 passengers and 13 crew members on board and two more people on the ground. It was the worst aviation accident in U.S. history and remains so today. Three months later, long after investigators had recovered the fragments they needed, Gonzales returned to the crash site. No grass had grown there. Thousands of pounds of kerosene will do that. “If you look closely,” he wrote in Playboy, “you can see that thousands upon thousands of pieces of white wire are embedded in the rich, black mud that sticks to your shoes as you walk along. The strands are buried deeply, as if by unimaginable force, and when you pull on them, bits of metal come out of the ground. … There are rivets and bolts, nuts and doublers and a few hefty remnants as big as a man’s hand. Suddenly, it dawns on you that this is not merely a bald, scarred patch of mud.” It was a gravesite. Gonzales collected a few pieces. Not for himself. For Syed Haider, the husband of his friend Vicky, one of those bodies marked by a stake topped with a little flag. With all the horrors and tragedies that befall cities around the world, few such events remain seared in our memories. And so for many, the crash of Flight 191 may not be as indelible as, say, the Oklahoma City bombing or Hurricane Katrina. But for Chicagoans who were here then, it was traumatizing — and still haunts those directly affected. Jane Byrne, Chicago’s mayor at the time and one of the first officials on the scene, described it as “probably the worst thing I’ve ever seen.” “Sometimes you scream in silence,” Greene wrote in the Tribune three days after the crash. “Sheldon Wax … was a nice man, and I am trying not to think about the fact that he is not a living man anymore, but a collection of wretched, anonymous body parts sealed in a bag in a hangar at O’Hare that is serving as a temporary morgue.” In the days and weeks that followed, the city mourned. Memorial services were held. At one of them, five days after the crash, more than 300 people packed the Arts Club of Chicago, then housed at 109 East Ontario Street, to honor Judy and Sheldon Wax. Among them, Arthur Kretchmer, Playboy’s editorial director, paid tribute to Shel’s quirks, including how he was always singing the first stanza — and only the first stanza — to the jazz standard “The Carioca” at work: Say, have you seen a Carioca? It’s not a foxtrot or a polka It has a little bit of new rhythm, a blue rhythm that sighs Stanley J. Hallet, a Methodist minister who was friends with the couple, read a memo penned by Shel, subject line “Bureau of Missing Persons,” that seemed to perfectly capture his wryness: “Gee willikers, gang, here I am being beaten about the head because of the mountain of overtime charges the magazine has piled up due to lateness and when I look around in the morning for someone to discuss them with, I wind up talking to myself. Not that I don’t find the conversation brilliant, but I’d much prefer other voices in the room.” The memo ends: “You’d be surprised to discover how clean the air is at that hour.” A friend of Judy’s, Pat Rahmann, recalled her love of writing and a line she wrote that particularly struck Rahmann: “You can’t catch a disease worse than loneliness.” And then, closing the ceremony, a poem by Judy’s daughter, Claudia — “To My Mother and Father” — was read: In one unutterable second you have vanished and left me with more than I could want to have when knowing that I look a bit like both of you is suddenly enough Over the next few months, investigators pieced together what went wrong with Flight 191, including why the jet, capable of being flown with only two of its three engines, nonetheless went down after just 31 seconds in the air. The investigation culminated with the release of an accident report by the National Transportation Safety Board four days before Christmas of that year. Sabotage was ruled out. As was pilot error. Lux and Dillard had followed emergency procedures to the letter. As Gonzales would describe in his piece for Playboy, NTSB investigators concluded that the cause was a shortcut by American Airlines mechanics. Specifically, after an across-the-fleet replacement of a faulty engine pylon, they had used a forklift to reconnect engines to their wings, when a more precise crane was needed. The forklift, however, was faster and therefore cheaper. NTSB investigators concluded that the cause was a shortcut American Airlines mechanics had taken reattaching an engine. Eight weeks before the crash, workers had used a forklift on Flight 191’s left engine. Over time, with the vibrations of each flight, the extra stress from the procedural shortcut caused a small crack in the flange securing the engine to the wing. The crack eventually grew to nearly 13 inches. When the plane reached takeoff speed that day, the engine simply snapped off, rolling up and over the left wing. In the process, it ripped away part of the leading edge of the wing, cutting the hydraulic lines and power to vital instruments in the cockpit, including communications with the control tower and, most crucially, the stall warning. Had Lux and Dillard known the plane was stalling, they could have increased its speed the moment it began to roll, rather than following standard protocol, which called for them to slow the aircraft. During subsequent NTSB testing, not one of 13 pilots in simulations re-creating the circumstances was able to save the plane. In the aftermath, all U.S. DC-10 jets were grounded until the issues could be addressed. Eventually, McDonnell Douglas, which merged with Boeing in 1997, ended production of the jets because of a lack of demand. Laurence Gonzales at the memorial wall near the crash site Photo: Lucy Hewett The man, breath smoking, crunched through the snow to the northwest corner of Lee Street and Touhy Avenue. His hair was white now, and he wasn’t quite sure he was in the right place, but the longtime investigative journalist would not be discouraged. He wound up finding what he was looking for: the low wall of bricks bearing the names of the dead from Flight 191. It had been nearly 40 years since he’d stood on the edge of the field northwest of Runway 32R, driven the streets of the trailer park, noted the place where the grass no longer grew. But scarcely a day had gone by that he had not given thought to what happened here. The brick wall — half hidden by trees, the plaque at its center reading “We Remember Flight 191” — had appeared only relatively recently. It had taken more than 30 years for someone to come up with the idea, then two years of lobbying by an assistant principal and students in the 2010 sixth-grade class at Decatur Classical School in West Rogers Park to get the memorial approved. The assistant principal’s parents had been on the flight. The man, now 71, tried to find the bricks bearing the names of Judith and Sheldon Wax, but they were hidden by frozen snow. It was enough for him to be near the site. Feel it. Again. Still, it hit him. His name could easily have been on a brick. But he wasn’t thinking about that now, nor the flight that moved past overhead, just south of him, big enough, it seemed, to reach out and touch. The plane kept rising and then vanished.

Delhi metro services on Blue line briefly disrupted after girl jumps in front of approaching train: DMRC india Updated: Mar 22, 2019 14:36 IST Metro services on the Blue line was briefly disrupted on Friday after a girl allegedly jumped in front of an approaching train at Noida sector 16 station, Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) said. “Delay in service between Noida Electronic City and Dwarka Sector 21 after a girl jumped in front of an approaching train at Noida sector-16 heading towards Dwarka at around 10.45 am,” a DMRC spokesperson said. Services on all other lines remained unaffected, he said. “I could not make it to office on time since the metro services on my route was delayed for about 20 minutes,” said a commuter.

Απ’ τα ξημερώματα της Δευτέρας ήταν στην Αθήνα κι αφότου πέρασε τις ιατρικές εξετάσεις και υπέγραψε το νέο του συμβόλαιο, ήταν η ώρα να ανακοινωθεί η απόκτηση του Μπούι απ’ τον Παναθηναϊκό. Όπως κι έγινε, με τον Ολλανδό άσο να αποτελεί και τυπικά το νέο μεταγραφικό απόκτημα των πράσινων, που θα παίξει στην χώρα μας μέχρι το επόμενο καλοκαίρι ως δανεικός απ’ τη Γιουβέντους. Η ανακοίνωση της ΠΑΕ: «Η ΠΑΕ Παναθηναϊκός ανακοινώνει τη συμφωνία της με τον Ουασίμ Μπούι. Ο Ολλανδός μέσος θα αγωνιστεί στην ομάδα μας τη νέα σεζόν, όντας δανεικός από την Γιουβέντους». «Είμαι πολύ χαρούμενος που θα παίξω για ένα τόσο σημαντικό Σύλλογο όπως ο Παναθηναϊκός, έχω λοιπόν μεγάλο κίνητρο και θα δώσω τα πάντα για να βοηθήσω την ομάδα να πετύχει τους στόχους της στο τέλος της σεζόν αλλά και να βελτιωθώ κι εγώ ακόμα περισσότερο σε προσωπικό επίπεδο», ήταν τα πρώτα λόγια του Μπούι, μετά την υπογραφή του συμβολαίου του.

Tulsi Gabbard, 2020 presidential candidate, is closing in on the number of donations that she needs in order to qualify to participate in the Democratic debates. As of March 20, 2019, she has 40,456 donations, which leaves her needing just a little less than 25,000 more donations to participate in the DNC debates. In total, as of March 20, she needs 24,544 more donations in order to qualify for the debates. In a phone call with volunteers on March 18, Gabbard shared that they had 38,000 donors so far, Daniel Clark shared. Clark is a volunteer for Tulsi Gabbard and was also a delegate for Bernie Sanders in 2016. He ran for Congress in 2020. Just two days after Gabbard’s campaign shared the news, that number of donations that she had received had already increased by more than 2,000. The updated donation number has also been confirmed by Status Coup. Clark also noted in his video that Gabbard needs 65,000 unique donors, not donations, and she’s already met (or is close to meeting) the 20 state threshold that the DNC also requires. People interested in donating to Gabbard’s campaign can donate directly on her website here. Contribution amounts start at $5, but you can change the amount if you wish to donate more or less than the suggested amounts. The donations made at that link are through ActBlue and will be directed to Gabbard’s campaign. However, personal checks can also be mailed to Gabbard at: Tulsi Now, PO Box 75255, Kapolei, HI, 96707. Here’s a graphic being shared that shows just how many donations Gabbard’s campaign still needs. The DNC has changed the debate rules this year and is going to limit its presidential debates to 20 candidates, Politico reported. In order to qualify for the first debate, candidates must receive donations from 65,000 people in at least 20 states, FiveThirtyEight reported. This includes a minimum of 200 different donors in at least 20 states, NBC News clarified. Candidates can also qualify by polling with at least 1 percent in three “qualifying” polls. Previously the DNC relied solely on polling, but is changing the rules due to the large number of candidates this time around. If more than 20 candidates meet this requirement, then the DNC will give preference to candidates who meet both polling and fundraising requirements. Then the field will be further limited to those who are polling the highest, followed by those with the most unique donors, NBC noted. The first debate will be in June. As a result of these new rules, Gabbard has asked for donations as small as $1 in order for her to meet the debate requirements. The first debate in June will be hosted by NBC, MSNBC, and Telemundo. The second debate in July will be hosted by CNN. The debates may feature back-to-back nights with candidates separated into two groups, but only a total of 20 will be able to participate, The Hill noted. You can stay updated on Tulsi Gabbard news written by this article’s author by joining the email list here and choosing the Bernie Sanders and Tulsi category.

View Transcript Transcript Wally The Economist. Dilbert: I wonder if you'll win the Nobel Prize for Economics. Man: There is no "Nobel Prize for Economics," you idiot! You mean The Sveriges Riksbank Prize In Memory of Alfred Nobel. Dilbert; Do we know you? Man: I'm Dick, from the Internet. Everyone knows me.

French luxury group Kering and Alibaba Group have established a joint task force to fight against counterfeiting on Alibaba’s online marketplaces. The deal, which was agreed last week, will see Kering drop its lawsuit against Alibaba and Alipay, the Ant Financial subsidiary that is part of Alibaba Group. Kering, which owns the luxury fashion brands Gucci and Saint Laurent, launched the legal action in 2015 accusing Alibaba of being complicit in the sale of counterfeit goods on its websites. This partnership will see the two companies work together to protect intellectual property in a bid to “provide the best consumer experience and a trusted environment”. According to a statement, “the companies have established a joint task force with the purpose of collaborating fully, exchanging useful information, and working closely with law enforcement bodies to take appropriate action against infringers of Kering’s brands identified with Alibaba’s advanced technology capabilities". Kering said it will continue to “vigorously enforce” the intellectual property rights of its brands “against individuals and third parties responsible for the production, distribution and sale of unauthorized materials in China and throughout the world”. The move comes in the same week that Kering’s Saint Laurent brand announced it would sell its products on Farfetch’s Greater China platform, which has launched in partnership with Alibaba rival JD.com. Farfetch has made clear that the ecommerce platform’s commitment to protecting brand’s intellectual property was a key factor behind its decision to partner with JD.com. The task force is the latest in a string of anti-counterfeiting initiatives launched by Alibaba, which includes the Alibaba Anti-Counterfeiting Alliance (AACA) which was established in partnership with brands such as Louis Vuitton, Swarovski, Samsung and Mars. Alibaba recently claimed it seized more than three billion yuan of counterfeit goods in 2016, a figure more than double that of the previous year.

A yellow police tape marks the crime scene at a poultry processing plant in Jalan Batu Maung, Penang, where a family of four were shot dead at 2.45am today. ― Picture courtesy of the Penang police GEORGE TOWN, July 13 ― A family of four, including a two-year-old boy, was shot dead in an early morning incident at a poultry processing factory on Jalan Batu Maung here today. Penang police Criminal Investigation Department (CID) chief Datuk Razaruddin Husain identified the victims as factory owner Toh Hock Choon, 50; his wife Tan Saw Sim, 55; and Tan’s son Chung Wah Thong. The toddler was Chung’s son. Razaruddin told reporters at the crime scene that the incident is believed to have happened about 2.45am, following an altercation between the factory owner and another stepson aged 32. The senior policeman believed the suspect shot the three adults first and turned on the child later when he came to check the commotion. “We believe when he shot the three victims, the two-year-old heard the commotion and came down the stairs where he too was shot,” he said. Malay Mail Online was able to obtain a recording of the news conference at the crime scene. Razaruddin said the police only knows the toddler by his nickname, Ah Bee, at the moment, and are looking to find his mother who lives in George Town. Initial investigations revealed that the suspected killer may be a drug addict and often argued with the victims. “A CCTV recording showed the suspect rummaging through things in the factory premises before he got into an argument with his stepfather,” Razaruddin said. “We believe he wanted to get money to get more drugs,” he added. A total of 11 bullet casings were found at the scene, and police believe 11 shots were fired at close range. The police have mounted a massive search for the suspect who is believed to be armed with a 9mm semi-automatic weapon. “He is believed to have shot the victims with the semi-automatic weapon and escaped in a Toyota Hilux with the plate number PLJ 7392,” Razaruddin said. He said patrol cars have been deployed in a massive hunt for the armed suspect and the borders have also been alerted. He appealed to the public to come forward if they have any information on the incident or the suspect. Editor’s note: An earlier report stated the child’s gender as female instead of male and has since been corrected. Malay Mail Online apologises for the mistake.

"Ryan got six months probation and five public work days," a source told Radar. "He has random drug tests in between." Edwards, 30, showed up to Red Bank City Court in a pink button-down shirt without his supportive wife Mackenzie by his side. The legal trouble started when Maci Bookout 's baby daddy was hit with a citation on March 12, 2017. Police pulled him over during a traffic stop for expired registration. During the stop, an officer saw a hypodermic needle in an open backpack on the passenger seat "I asked Edwards if he had any medical conditions and he replied, 'No,'" the citation obtained from Red Bank City Court read. "I then asked why he had a hypodermic needle in his backpack and he replied, 'I don't know.' I told them that the vehicle will be searched and he should inform me if there are more and Edwards replied, 'Yes, probably." Cops confiscated 14 hypodermic needles, one of which was loaded with heroin, and a bag with a dark substance inside. "I asked Edwards what it was and he replied, 'It's heroin and I have a problem.'" Authorities also recovered two silver spoons with residue on them and a scale. The heroin was weighed and found to be 1.8 grams. He was issued a misdemeanor citation for simple possession of heroin, possession of paraphernalia and expired registration. He pled guilty to the simple possession of heroin charge. He was sentenced to 11 months and 29 days in jail. The sentence was suspended upon payment of a $750 fine and good behavior. He was ordered to take drug screenings for six months. The possession of drug paraphernalia and expired registration offenses were dismissed. He entered rehab for heroin use after he was caught on camera slurring his words and falling asleep at the wheel while driving to his May wedding to wife Mackenzie. Edwards and wife have claimed he has remained sober since the stint But then on March 27, 2018, he was arrested for petition to revoke, which means breaking probation. Radar exclusively revealed he failed a court-ordered drug test on January 17, 2018. He tested positive for opiates and morphine in a urine sample. Edwards' drug of choice heroin is classified as an opiate "He failed the scheduled drug test," a source told Radar. "That is why they charged him with Petition to Revoke."

ニュース 2016年01月01日 2016年に年女となる、1992年の申年生まれのグラビアアイドルたち。サルといえば、動物園のショーなどで愛嬌とひょうきんさで人々を楽しませてくれるが、それと同じようにグラビア界の申年女子たちも、持ち前のサービス精神で今年もファンを盛り上げてくれそうだ。 今年24歳となるグラドルの代表格的な存在といえば、篠崎愛だろう。昨年デビュー10周年を迎えた彼女は、愛くるしい顔立ちと似つかわしくない迫力満点のバストで「最強のロリ巨乳」とも呼ばれて高い人気を誇る。昨年は、もともと定評のあった歌唱力を生かして歌手活動も本格化させ、ソロ歌手としてアルバムをリリースした。テレビCMで伸びやかな歌声を披露した巨乳ナース姿が目に焼きついている人も多いことだろう。 篠崎はSNSへの投稿もマメで、プライベート感あふれるセクシーな自画撮り画像のほか、深夜にラーメンやカツ丼を食べる様子をアップした「飯テロ写真」も好評。豊満なスタイルが絶賛される彼女らしいファンサービスには今年も期待したいところだ。 そんな篠崎とはタイプが違い、175センチという高身長で大人びた魅力を放つのが、染谷有香だ。スレンダーなスタイルながらGカップという迫力のある胸を持つ彼女は「エロデカいグラドル」と言われ、グラビア界でもこれまでになかなかいなかった逸材として人気と知名度を高めている。 2015年は、多数のバラエティ番組にゲスト出演したほか、深夜のグラドル育成番組『ドラマ！7人のアイドルゴーゴー！』（テレビ朝日系）でドSキャラを発揮した染谷。ドスのきいた低い声で共演したグラドルたちを罵倒する姿にM心をくすぐられた男子も多かったようで、「染谷ちゃんに怒られたい」などの声が相次いだ。しかし、そんな個性とは裏腹に、雑誌のインタビューなどでは「男性との経験が1度もないんです」とバージンを公言しており、処女厨と呼ばれる人々からも注目を集める存在だ。

Die ursprünglich aus Südamerika stammenden Tiere verursachen erhebliche Schäden auf Raps und Getreideflächen. Vergrämungsversuche zeigten bisher keine Erfolge. Deshalb hatte das Biosphärenreservatsamt Schaalsee-Elbe wiederholt einen Antrag des Kreisbauernverbandes auf eine Manipulation der Gelege genehmigt. Dazu wurden die frisch gelegten noch gelben Eier teilweise mit Paraffin überzogen oder angebohrt. „Die aktuelle Entwicklung ist für mich Anlass prüfen zu lassen, ob weitere Möglichkeiten bestehen, mit denen wir dem Populationsanstieg entgegenwirken können“, so der Minister für Landwirtschaft und Umwelt Dr. Till Backhaus.

ES News email The latest headlines in your inbox twice a day Monday - Friday plus breaking news updates Enter your email address Continue Please enter an email address Email address is invalid Fill out this field Email address is invalid You already have an account. Please log in Register with your social account or click here to log in I would like to receive lunchtime headlines Monday - Friday plus breaking news alerts, by email Update newsletter preferences Travellers lost nearly 1,000 items on the Tube — including golf clubs, shoes and underwear — during the busiest weekend of Christmas celebrations last year, data shows. Analysis showed 949 items were lost on the London Underground in two days, ranging from credit cards and wallets to hats and mobile phones. Partygoers are being urged to be careful of their belongings this weekend, as people finish work for the festive break. Today is widely known as Mad Friday — traditionally the last working Friday before Christmas when thousands of revellers go to pubs and bars. Data obtained from Transport for London by the home insurance company Policy Expert shows people lost 200 debit and credit cards, 62 hats, 54 mobile phones, 47 purses and wallets and three passports. Other lost items included footwear, which was found at Bond Street, earrings, which were lost at Cockfosters, and ear muffs at Rayners Lane. Underwear was left behind in Wood Green, while two golf clubs, 32 scarves and four suitcases also went missing. The stations where most items were lost last year were Hammersmith, Oxford Circus and King’s Cross. In total, just 120 items were claimed back. Adam Powell, Policy Expert’s operations director, said: “Thousands of people will celebrate the start of the Christmas break in the capital this weekend and whilst there is no need to dampen the festive spirit, Mad Friday revellers should keep a close eye on their personal belongings. “We carry hundreds of pounds of belongings on us when we go out and it could be an expensive ordeal should they disappear down the gap. Making sure you have away-from-home cover included in your home insurance policy can give you peace of mind that if something does go missing, you won’t be out of pocket.” Mad Friday, also known as Frantic Friday, is one of the busiest nights for the emergency services. On the equivalent Friday last year paramedics received 300 calls per hour. The emergency services usually station extra staff on the streets in anticipation.

Because of the extreme temperatures of exhaust systems, we do not recommend J-B Weld for use on exhaust manifolds and catalytic converters. Nor do we recommend the product for repairs within the combustion chamber. However, in areas where the continuous temperature is less than 450º F, we do recommend our HighHeat epoxy putty stick.