Datasets:

SINAI

/

MCE-Corpus

like 0

Follow

Grupo de investigación en Sistemas Inteligentes de Acceso a la Información (SINAI) de la Universidad de Jaén 13

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3816

Ana Belén Pacheco

Zoo

muchocine

Zoo does not judge, does not pose ideas, does not give options to the Viewer, the director assumes the normality of what it tells. It is long, boring and somewhat heavy because it does not create sympathy nor hatred for none of what appears on the screen. I'm staying with Equus.

Zoo is a rare film. It is not only the pseudo documentary format or disturbing topic which is, rather is the complete package.This small newspaper on a zoophilic (or group of them for is more correct terminológicamente speaking) explained with disturbing voices in off where, how and why is the love for animals born after the terrible death of one of them. Kenneth Pinyan died shortly after being brought to the emergency room of a hospital in Enumclaw, Washington, where traveling is one of the few States where crime is not considered. According to death certificates, he succumbed to internal injuries resulting from a perforation of colon. Began a police investigation that led to a farm. There were revealed videocassettes and DVD in which several men claimed sex with horses. The documentary, based on the testimony of one of the participants, has novice players to rebuild the vision of these practice account with much material of the events which occurred in 2005 as interviews of radio or television which helped to give the account entity and to accompany resource images which tend to aim at the lyric and poetic rather than the chabacano Act specifically zoophilic.The main problem of the narrative is that it is quite complicated to connect with the spectator despite trying to show the concerns of each of the protagonists of the story. It is difficult to justify or understand the bestiality or that encourages a person to change State to maintain relations with a horse. While in the tapes on adolescents or in the hands of Kevin Smith the thing may seem up fun take it seriously costs a little more. Comparing it with Peter Shaffer's Equus, play written in the 1970s revolutionized in due course to the public (and even still gave a couple of blows in the Assembly of this year) Zoo seems an exercise in college more carnal than anything else. Sex explicit appears little on screen but no one has objections in talk about it. En la obra de Shaffer made into a film by Sydney Lumet its protagonist prefers hurting animals aware of the relationship (which never comes to be carnal) is amoral. All the work is understood to the young man and his inner struggle coming to the end to understand his anguish. In Zoo never raises the possibility that stakeholders recognize that his behavior is questionable, it defends the difference and its freedom and motivation to go ahead because its director envisages that the existence of these practices is real and reasonable.Zoo does not judge, does not pose ideas, does not give options to the Viewer, the director assumes the normality of what it tells and precisely therein lies the controversy surrounding the film and its main Achilles heel. It is long (despite last an hour and ten minutes), boring and somewhat heavy because it does not create sympathy nor hate for anything of what appears on the screen. I'm staying with Equus.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/26

Doris

Memorias de una Geisha

muchocine

In reality, it is a story of love more than a miserable biography

The Asian cinema has become already what the whole of their countries of origin, into a giant. This week opens in Spain with great anticipation the adaptation of best-seller memoirs of a geisha. And is certainly a superproduction full-scale, above all by the fact that the head is that made Chicago (dot were Spielberg or Spike Jonze) and because the Bill is American. And in addition, includes in its cast to more flashy movie stars: Michelle Yeoh, Ziyi Zhang, Li Gong and Ken Watanabe. By the way, that only he is Japanese, because the great Yeoh was born in Malaysia and the other two in the Chinese millenarian. Curious. Also appear around Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa, Koji Yakusho, and Randall Duk Kim, surely they have seen in some other movie.The recreation of the Japan of the 1930s and 40 is fantastic, and that is all decorated less, I think, the gardens of the tea room, an explosion of colour and peace (Yes, the Zen philosophy me has invaded). And the story is almost epic. In fact, it is a love story rather than a miserable biography, which is well known that the own and real protagonist, Mineko Iwasaki, not congraciaba, so decided to write their own version later. It is interesting, however, contemplate how entrenched culture moves the everyday life of women since the girls are and how these are prepared to be the most desired and envidiadas. Because it also shows the greed and decrepitude which at one point invades the hearts of women. All very metaphorical, very rhetorical and highly decorated, as you can imagine. But however nice and without being heavy, that it is true that some Eastern productions sin of this.So, despite some other sober loose and the overwhelming and little Cape that is the development of the narrative occasionally (Incidentally, in voice-over, a very Resolutive resource), not to put too many objections to memoirs of a geisha. And since then, the actresses I liked once again. Pretty as they alone. Mr Watanabe is seen more, what going you to do.If you want to see something else this mysterious world, two Councils. My dear Moriarty has strongly recommended me you see Zatoichi, of the illustrious (says he) Takeshi Kitano. That, talking about another thing, back to see you soon in one of its more crazy facets, says Gadxeto blog. And one more thing: if they can contemplate a day most ancient Japanese traditions, as the ceremony of tea or the placement of a kimono (thanks to Sony). Nothing more.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2469

Victor Trujillo

Ladrones

muchocine

Predictable, somewhat ñoño indent with characters coming out of the imagination of the author and not the street. I went with all the hopes of a good Spanish movie and went home denying once again the Spanish film.

Slow, boring, snooty. How can shoot a film on "thieves" with so much music for Orchestra and only a Chase (and quite sad indeed)?. Too many slow cameras, sobran close-up and take more action and more script. A predictable script somewhat ñoño, with characters coming out of the imagination of the author and not the street. I went with all the hopes of a good Spanish movie and went home denying once again the Spanish film, bored and above gives them of "sophisticated".They did not impress in slow images, not impress the acting work or the nor of her, not impress the millions of stage-managed scenes that submitted to us by its director, and especially not impressed the love story, already somewhat taken with tweezers.I wonder what will be thinking the producers who opt for this kind of movies. Would have gone to see her?. When I left the cinema, I thought I was the only one dissatisfied. It is that "do not understand film", of course. Nor understood little more than 50 persons who "swarmed" room. Long, boring faces and more than one "go rollazo", and "go NAP I missed". That said, desesperanzadora, slow, boring and snooty. It is that "you do not know film Victor". It must be that.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/946

Caruco

Grbavica

muchocine

Perhaps we do end up with bent head, but vale spending 90 minutes of our lives.

Still lingers in my memory that tragic final scene of "Germany, year zero" (1948) Rossellini. With the emotion contained, in color, and leaving the procession to go inside, we run into this Bosnia and Herzegovina, year 11, a country under construction, marked by the still recent aftermath of a war that left more than 100,000 dead, nearly two million exiles and some 40,000 women raped by the ultranationalist Bosnian Serbs.And among its ruins, human, and real estate in this Germany of the postwar period, begins a reconstruction that will affect entire generations.Do not expect any film feast in "Grbavica", rather its images are grey and everyday, that go come and go in the neighborhood of Sarajevo that gives title to the film. This and the lament of a Director, Jasmila Ebanic debutant, that not even could get a 35 mm camera. and a laboratory that roll and make the post-production of the film."The price of a trip.""Grbavica" definitely not mark any new generation of moviegoers. It is made with more desire and commitment to media and imagination. It is the cry not for quiet, less sense on a violent past and a difficult coexistence, marked by humiliation and resentment.Its history is as simple as a mother, Esma (Mirjana Karanovic), widow of war, trying to do the impossible to collect 200 euros is worth a school trip for her daughter, Luna Mijovic (Sara), of twelve years. Do a fee that would go you to half price if he could certify that her husband is a? shahid?, a martyr of the war, but that she, by some mystery, can not get.And it is the story of a rebellious teenager with cause, Sara, he begins to notice the first effects of love in a script that, on the other hand, eludes the Vulgarisation of this aspect in which fall most of commercial production of consumption fast.Essentially portentosa is the interpretation of Esma, usual actress of Emir Kusturica, who can convey all the details of affection, weariness or outrage that entails. Especially in some revealing moments of his character.Thousands of Esmas.Esma, a still attractive widow, which nevertheless refuses to erotizar, as advised a him companion of the nightclub where he works, to attract men or clientele. ESMA, a dedicated mother, but that appears to not bear too well physical contact with his daughter, for instance, lying on the ground while playing, or when the girl decides to cut the nails. ESMA, a fragile woman but which reacts however enraged against her suitor, the bully Pelda (Leon Lucev), when he defends it of aggression, because she hates violence more than anything.And like her, thousands. Although only show us a few, which meet at a local in the neighborhood to try to exorcise nightmares that I hope none of us need to wake up ever."Lost between their faces, that girl of twelve years, delighted to have a gun in his hands, kissing for the first time to their noviete, but it also begins the painful path toward understanding, and that also means maturity.""Grbavica" is one of those movies that perhaps makes us put an end to the bent head, but it is worth spending 90 minutes of our lives.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/412

José Córdoba

Piratas del Caribe 2

muchocine

There is no substantial changes in tone with respect to the above, returning to repeat the same mistakes and others are accentuated.

Jack Sparrow is back and with the whole his troupe pirates, in this successful continuation of the film directed by Gore Verbinski two years ago. If one has to define it in one sentence, it would be "more of the same". There is no substantial changes in tone with respect to the above, returning to repeat the same mistakes and others are accentuated. His greater burden is excessive length for so little history, moreover, has no conclusion because he has shot together with the third party, who will come to be the piece of history that lacks it. Thus we have a film of more than two hours to which could perfectly remove him thirty minutes, because its central section becomes eternal, the not happen nothing really. It is a pity because the film starts well, with verve, with a scene in a really fun Cannibal Island, but from there, put the brakes to the rhythm and the plot and enters the monotony, that only leaves in its final stretch. Johnny Depp is fun, even more last lap than the first, but is what he asks his character so perfect, Orlando Bloom and Keira Knightley are as dull as of custom. However, best of the function, as already happened in the first, we found it in the villain role played by Bill Nighty, although it is an infographic creature half human half squid, perfectly created by ILM. Its action and the work of ILM is so perfect that we can distinguish in a fully digital creature to the old rokero of Love Actually. In an era where already nothing surprises us this turns into something very remarkable. The direction of Verbinski returns to be very effective and adequate, away from the excesses of all factory Bruckheimer productions. The script with very funny moments suffers from the problem of having split down the Middle, stretching the plot for two films, but lacks it content to fill the two and a half hours which takes the film. The worst aspect of the film, as well as in the first, returns to music excessive 30metre, out of tune, overwhelming, aggressive, too, that only manages to find tone in the comic scenes, but in general can cause headaches. It was composed by Hans Zimmer and five or six others in auto pilot mode, being the antithesis of the great work he did for the code da Vinci. Really little else to say, if you liked the first this you will like depending on the degree of requirement you have, if not you do not try. I enjoyed the first with nuances and this also, but with more stick still. The structure of the trilogy has as a clear model of the original trilogy of "The wars" but, unfortunately, is light, never better said, hehe.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/62

El mágico

Buenas noches y buena suerte

muchocine

Committed and controversial proposal

Second film directed by George Clooney (the first, "Confession of to dangerous mind" had a relative success of criticism but little reception from the audience), candidate to the Oscar in several areas, "Good night and good luck" is a committed and controversial proposal. If it is important, however, is a film concerning a particular moment of contemporary American history, happens in the 1950s and in it we will be witnesses of the anti-communist crusade led by Senator Joseph McCarthy with the House UN-American activities Committee. This Wisconsin Senator perpetrating an insane witch hunt that installs a heated in the United States debate, it is then when with the firm intention to communicate the facts and keep informed the public, Edward Murrow (impressive characterization of David Strathairn, strong candidate for his starring Oscar) and his journalistic of the CBS team, challenging the corporate and economic pressure to be able to examine the lies and scare tactics perpetrated by McCarthy during his hunt. The first thing to be said is that it is filmed in white and black (subtitling may be complicated to read, be warned!) and that "Good night and good luck" is armed with excellent material files and its narration has quite documentary basis, element that gives the tape a physiognomy that stands out it for its atmosphere and pace. The story is well armed, is agile, committed and respect the conventions of the time in which it occurred to strictly (the ads of the show are incredible), secondary are good (all correct, Clooney also nominated here) but what will remain to remind of this film are the lines which Murrow is going saying over the tape that they refer to the journalismthe role of politicians and their commitment as a citizen. Actor "Syriana" (also in billboard) now director top in Hollywood wanted to met this journalist and its value in a time where fight for the right of information is perceived as a chimera. "Good night and good luck" seems a self-centred and cut film at a time of American history, but it is the theme that is universal, the struggle of men committed to let the public know the truth of facts that cross his existence beyond the perceptible to the naked view.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/435

Nisuyaves

Clerks 2

muchocine

Long life to Dante and Randall though I very much fear that we will not come back to see more.Congratulations to Kevin Smith, often crack!

The big question was, does exceed the first after so long and is considered a cult movie? I imagine that many purists will say that no such and that which, but the truth is for me Yes. In all in the address quality, dialogues and characters (the brides of Randall, especially Rosario Dawson is tremendous (fits perfectly in the role despite being a star) and the Geek of the Burger). It may was that the intervention of Bob me waiting best, but well, he forgives her.Most notable is the same (and that is good) from the first, the conversations between the characters (mostly nonsensical or important, such as pregnancy or the war between the Lord of the rings and star wars). One of the best points of the movie is the explanation of Randall on the three movies of Peter Jackson, not to mention the farewell Dante.Jay and Bob as always, theirs, are followed exactly equal. Ben Affleck also appears in the form of cameo (hopeless era).Best in direction is top in black and white, as with the first movie at a time and with quality, and the end, I not betraying but yes advance is fucking great!Long life to Dante and Randall though I very much fear that we will not come back to see more.Congratulations to Kevin Smith, often crack!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/960

Rafa Martín

Happy feet

muchocine

George Miller wants to return to the good cane. Someone you a script to match.

The film needs to George Miller. If you want to get an idea of what is to be the best producer in the world in a time and place determined, I recommend the screening of two films of this extraordinary Australian director: Mad Max 2 and the oil of life. You can share a couple of features as his fellow countryman Peter Weir, including inability to biological make a bad movie, but unlike the second, much more focused on the characters, the sense of the epic of Miller knows no rival. It is not an intimate epic which we are accustomed the director of Master & Commander or single witness, but the great sense of entertainment that can be enjoyed on the big screen. By very children film than Happy Feet, and very bad that she feels in the stomach the tremendísimo downturn plaguing the film halfway through footage, when this film explodes (because that is what happens at certain times) reaches the level of classic animation, reasoned that the incredible images of Miller are complemented by an animation game. And when I say game, I say level a millimeter below musical Pixar.Parte, part adventure on snow, part ecological message, Happy Feet is the story of Mumble, son of Memphis and Norma Rae. As penguins emperors who are their parents (and here I creeré what tell me the movie because I have not simply, or slut), couples places Court through the songs. In the first scene of the film, Norma Rae, sliding between the penguins males to the rhythm of Kiss, Prince, is instantly subjugated by an impressive electric version of the Heartbreak Hotel of Presley (Jackman practically devours this film). The two fall in love, fornican off screen and lay an egg. It is a full scene of rhythm which marks the rest of the songs that appear throughout the footage: have the same energy and vitality to Moulin Rouge, but hellish epilepticus Assembly or the medley.On the verge of passing a bad drink.And vale which is a wonderful way to start a film, and predicts good omens, but is the second sequence that you have recorded in the retina: thousands of penguins male (females leave home during the winter to hunt) they guard the eggs, glued against each other while the elders of the clan shout words of encouragement, under an incredible storm at sunset. It is this the type of things that used to make Miller before, taking every opportunity to use its visual strength, and so create images of enormous power (hopefully many agree Mad Max, contemplating the lights of the refinery from atop a cliff before the fall overnight). Accompanied by epic choirs, it is really sensational, and it seems that he is about to escape from the genre of movie for kids, but not the case. And that, if you are that you like to involve you in depth with what you see in the film, is almost a disgrace to see what lies ahead.Thus, this type of impact not be repeated many times throughout the film: is too routine in the moment that becomes a metaphor for equality when we discovered that the son of Memphis and Norma Rae, Mumble, can not sing. It is its exceptional ability to dance tap which will become the engine of the film (what you're thinking: tries to sing, fails, throw you / will, discover world and returns done best Penguin). Despite the fact that it is a perfectly natural plot, begins to fall to lead halfway through the film, as soon as Mumble meets a clan of penguins. of the race "estereotipus cubanus" (experts in dance, clear.) (Because all the Cubans are experts in dance, right?) and it is not only predictable, but that is boring; include before the second great moment of the film, with all the penguins singing version George Michael in Wembley of the Somebody To Love, of Queen, is a reminder of bass that falls after the film. Fortunately, there are a few action scenes, including the attack of a terrifying Leopard seal (never thought that you would write something like "terrifying seal"), courtesy of the Spanish artist Miguel Angel forts, or the fight against a couple of hungry killer whales, which are very dynamic, and are very well made, but it is clear that Miller wants to take another path. The last twenty minutes show us, when the ecological message of the film and where, for the first time from it for a long time, someone has the eggs of integrating digital animation with characters of flesh and blood. Is it effective? Part: it is clear to see millions (literally) of penguins dancing at the same time, in the final scene of the film, it is a visual delight, and the coexistence between humans and animals is a simple, but powerful and well-intentioned message. But there is also something that just does not fit, and is that Miller completely changes the message of the film. If the second act is boring, the third is abrupt, seems another different movie, and changes the direction of the film almost radical shape (and get me the feeling that if Happy Feet collects $ 200 million will not be by what the film wants to count, but because children want to see dancing penguins).Breaking the track.However, the delight is there, despite the fact that the script of "painting with numbers" lastra to the film, its director raises the level above than expected, and even more. If only it would have found something more in what nail nails, we would be talking about the best film of the year, but seems that the pela remains the pela and that feed the children films as the iron giant is a thing of the past. Happy Feet is impressive to see how a National Geographic documentary, is animated in an exceptional way (Mumble movements were captured from the great tap dancer Savion Glover) but a film with aspirations may not include secondary infectos (Robin Williams lends his voice rather than one or two, but three damn bugs) or so forced and pointless action scenes. It's simple: George Miller wants to return to give the good cane. Someone you a script to match.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2402

Alex Largo

Déjà Vu

muchocine

Broadly speaking, we can only say that we we have a film with the seal of Bruckheimer, with all the good and bad that entails.

Jerry Bruckheimer has always opted for the entertainment, already know, Pirates (the Caribbean), Kings English (King Arthur), terrorists Patriots (the rock). And precisely terrorist Patriots is "Déjà Vu", although here the terrorist doesn't have even half of protagonism that Ed Harris in "the rock".The film begins in an interesting way, with an attack. Although the scene is good, I think they could have done a top job, although, truth, have never had in great esteem to Tony Scott, although that does not mean that the man deserves the wage.Then, all what comes later, almost exclusive subject of Denzel Washington, the eternal police. In fact, the first part of the film, before "Snow white", relies on Denzel so the Viewer does not lose interest in the film and Denzel us once again shows why always police. Because it does superbly.The second part of the movie, everything that comes after that Doug choose to avoid the attack and all deaths, makes the tape off interest. But that for the work of Washington and his co-stars, the tape more earn interest than correct direction of Scott and the script.The end, although it could have given more than itself (the character of the terrorist could have been used better) is good.One of the best things of the tape are the action scenes, which although not brilliant are really entertaining and never become heavy.Perhaps what most plays against the tape is, precisely, Déjà Vu. All this (frankly idiot) explanation of the space time is already taken with Tongs and does not convince anyone. Necessary to make the story fairly credible, although the writers could have been currado something better explanation, but as mine is not physics.Broadly speaking, we can only say that we we have a film with the seal of Bruckheimer, with all the good and bad that entails. Entertainment, nothing more. With the addition of a good cast (with the exception of Adam Goldberg) and an interesting story.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/783

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Storm

muchocine

The stridency of modernity in three acts entirely dispensable Garners however, condescension, even if it is only about the risk involved in this Europe with so much need of film that combines box office and critical.

Storm is a Swedish film that not directs Bergman which is so to say a pop group other than Abba and Roxette. Moreover, well it could have been Namibian or Belgian. Now the film has these things: that his arguments happen in a country abstract, decontextualized. As well (guess) any viewer can identify better with what it has.In Storm this (lawful) reflection marra: the couple protagonist embarks on a crusade which at times seems a Treaty of psychoanalysis and by others we see a metaphysical thriller deep Kantian principles. Or is. That the directors (two perpetrators of the event) will have bundled more than enough and, in the end, they have delivered a mass entertainment with pedigree of art and essay not enters through the eyes and that escapes (is my case, let's see, going over the years losing mental fortitude and can not stand three jets followed) by some brain gap that we not well closed.To me I was whole. It also took little. It could be the afternoon or mood or a symbiosis of both with a plus of prior labour fatigue. Storm is a disconcerting film, which does not mean bad altogether. Not it admits to clear any gender and dive without enthusiasm complex sea the abundant mini-géneros will be presenting by way of sophisticated fashion show. It is not concerned at any time by calling stylistic or narrativamente in any. Perhaps (for its deliberate lack of serious pretensions) do you not need.Storm is a creaking Mystic: maybe Swedish cinema post-Bergman is everything and the Nordic public is already tired of pastors that persuasions on faith and Sin in a farmhouse lost in a forest. Master Bergman, which to me bores me a lot, was the case. The fascination exerted by some of his portentous images (the dark streets, the camera dives, twisted on the pavement) does not save the film, but not they drag it to total oblivion. There are moments of cinema care: there are no two bunglers, but also shines the pulse of a steady hand who knows at all times what and in what order. This lack of clarity exhibition is, in my view, previsa the very succinct script.Interested in the hodgepodge between the naïve and the hardcore, this deadpan limbo of its complex (and abobada) plot. The style of Storm is his no-estilo. And that has a merit is the Swedish film or, as I say, Mozambique. We have the belief that history is not the fundamental attraction but there are other possibilities: we are more aware of not losing that reach port. Is that a symptom of a bad film? I have not clear at all. Do not rest you a charm, a picturesqueness, a certain artistic direction, a simple composition of the scene that brush a plot with a vocation for science fiction or modern thriller or horror, but some dialogue disarm my patience and produce me a huge intellectual anxiety that disturbs me hours later of seeing it.The stridency of modernity in three acts entirely dispensable Garners however, condescension, even if it is only because of the risk that is, in Sweden, in this Europe with so much need of film that combines box office and critical, making this film. Let us not, then, hard in excess, but in what to me it regarding promise not lie with viewing except that oblivion disturbs me or me again soft like a croissant at eight in the morning. Oh, and if someone sees and has more wisdom than I am to see if it explains me the storms that come and go and the ultimate meaning of the box of yore. I just need a psychoanalyst. Argentine, if possible.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2434

JLO

El señor de los anillos: Las dos torres

muchocine

A show that points and gives blank, which is unusual in the current Billboard. In short, if you want to know what is an epic adventure, here it is for you:

The Tolkien universe seems at first glance a unfathomable challenge both for its size and by their infinite sub-tramas and its many and varied characters. After seeing this film and direction performed therein Peter Jackson, it seems fairly easy to do or at least, the best way to achieve this. More incredible seems to be the same Jackson who began his career with Bad Taste (bad taste, 1988) a film gore-trash with the easy label of bizarre, but of sympathy and an improvisation at exaggerated doses now demonstrating a growth and maturity (with films of transition as heavenly creatures) little seen in Directors of her litter.So enjoyable returns to be the route for over three hours and peak action and adventures that will be briefly and further, improving the pace of the first. Jackson is faithful to the book again, taking the essence and discard (as in the first part) scenes that perhaps we would have liked to see but that would have made it even more Marathon than it was. The two towers starts to any action with one of the best (maybe the best) film beginning of the year. Welcome also the fact to have been filmed all three parties in continued owing to this his fluid narration, agile and effective, with excellent photography and other technical aspects.This time is more important with the passage of the footage guerrero-héroe Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen, measured and innocuous) and his many battles with his companions Legolas (Orlando Bloom) and the dwarf Gimli (John Davies) to the detriment of the long continuous journey of Frodo (Elijah Wood) and even the resurrected Gandalf (an as always excellent Ian Mc Kellen). Another advantage is having made the virtual Gollum (a being likable and obnoxious at the same time), a character functional in history and not a mere entertainment or escapism and for example of this, just one example: Jar Jar Binks.En only must include a tedious incidental music that emphasizes some dialogues already on their solemn and have wished a greater dose of humor, but really not necessary in this type of story. Surely will be compared until the tired with their contemporary Harry Potter and Star Wars taking them a body by the time both in implementation, effects and at maturity, but it will have to wait to give the final verdict to conclude all the sagas but saying is, already leads them a significant advantage. Interestingly in all these series the second parts are better than the first, as if needed Yes or Yes an introduction to then be able to evolve and delving into the history more clearly.A final battle without respite (and a real challenge to overcome in the third and final part) crowned a brilliant film in every sense, a spectacle that points and gives blank, which is unusual in the current Billboard. In short, if you want to know what is an epic adventure, here's to you: the Lord of the Rings: the two towers. Enjoy it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/986

José A. Peig

Eragon

muchocine

We are not going to waste time explaining the hows and whys. To say the least, and thus we are reassuring, Eragon blatantly copy clichés of other more fortunate productions, productions which also merit the category of classics in their field.

Frankly, it is bad but it is not so bad. Say what is bad but until vomitivas dimensions. It is an insult to the Viewer, it is a putada.Maybe what is happening is that you enter us the neuro as the genre of epic fantasy is one of our two or three favorite film genres. And I stress "film" because I've always thought that epic fantasy, if it is well made, has a greater power of fascination represented on the screen than in the written letter. But not, but seriously, but esto.pero esto.pero esto.pero this what is?. Ye, for the donkey you are asking for pears to del olmo. It is Christmas, pardillo, cinema one adventure very much in the use of these dates of magic and illusion. Opportunistic product that lands star in a bad historical moment. We stress the historical context.But, damn, boy this (bad actor, what asco's uncle) blonde makes crumbs with dragons and nymphs has followed Luke Skywalker and Frodo Baggins, two characters of luxury for the fantástico-épico genus, authentic Archetypes of the adventure film such as Odyssey and metaphor for our lives, of good entertainment film, ostia. Because, come on, do not fuck with me, or Marc Hamill Elijha Wood were great actors, nor nor interpreted especially complex characters, but how well-defined and represented were in an environment of ideals, hazards, and profiles of a splendid characterisation and sense of how wonderful, allowing even than two characters flat as folios have ease, the dimension of the real and true development along an adventure that goes from point A to point B. (more) (afternoon or more early we hincaremos him the tooth, under the point vision of "Images and words", the saga of George Lucas and Peter Jackson trilogy, and they give me chills only of thinking in the resultado.y how much we have to learn). Hey, Eragon entertains, right?. Shit. Why?. Because that is the worst thing, so the bad vomitous entertains us. And you have a fitting end to the end and all, than it is to tell a story for children. But "E.T" was not something that same, and "The Goonies"?. Exact, here comes the tragedy. That one and the other are the same but Eragon nobody will be agreed within twenty years and "The Goonies" and "E.T", around thirty, still selling like the rosquilletas in successive editions and being revised with permanent I enjoy year after year. Those were the times of good cinema innocent, for children and parents, but done with a heart at the height of the illusions and live magic in everyone, adults and children. Children and parents today deserve the same. Eragon could be a more than passable work distractora in dates of illusion, but is such the unwillingness and lack of talent...absence of.?. No, it is not, that is the worst thing. Not me I think that talent is over. The effectiveness and ability to James Cameron or Richard Donner, both equipped with a modest master of entertainment film, is not so difficult to achieve. Let us not talk of Spielberg, an individual with film in the veins that, in specific cases, was able to raise it to anthologies, mystical, proportions even. It is is is that you watch that it has bémoles. and I me cago in tó. what I talking about Spielberg, Donner and Cámeron?. Nostalgia. We grew up with them and thanks to their small jewels of recreational and leisure movie fan sensibility, today many love the film throughout its range or route that quality is concerned, since Mel Gibson to Ingmar Bergman, from Roland Emmerich up M. Night Shyamalan and everything what we throw. Come, we relax. And seriously, "Eragon" meets justito in its role of Christmas film, can be seen with pleasure has its good moments, I would venture to say that it is correct and honest because it gives what it promises. The uneducated Viewer - cinefilamente speaking - enough. But there is a canon established and known to all those who we love and mamamos Luke Skywalker or Frodo Baggins. Not I am assessing Eragon based on stupid comparisons with "The Lord of the rings" or "Star Wars" (because such a comparison would be stupid). We are pointing out the difference between what is well done and what not this well done in the field of fantasy and epic or the sword and brujeria or as you want to call it.We are not going to waste time explaining the hows and whys. To say the least, and thus we are reassuring, Eragon blatantly copy clichés of other more fortunate productions, productions which also merit the category of classics in their field. Behind this plagiarism there is some uniqueness. Blame already know who he is. Stefen December?, to be devoted to something else. Work­the, to crack her.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/565

Natalia Eseverri

Click

muchocine

Click has the problem that happens to most of the comedies, if you like Adam Sandler, as it is my case, you love, and if not, not worth going to see.

There are many times that people ask me why I go often to the cinema and sometimes not is to answer, simply say that I like to spend the afternoon in a room imaginandome every one of the stories that appear on the screen and putting me in each of the worlds and perspectives that alli is offered me. In short, a metaphorical response plan and spiritual that I can not argue when I spend five dollars to see crap that is not worth the trouble and that nasty I leave thinking that me them it could have spent in a jersey that I would spend that cursed winter Barcelona.But on Monday, again remember why cinema is so important in my life, I am not going to dwell much to not tire you, but my Odyssey to find floor is not proving as satisfactory as you might expect, is perfectly at first it would not find, I have to look far, compare prices and qualities and everything else, but when you awake an illusion and a shit of site as it is the Bank you truncates in five minutes, the truth is that it ends with the most beautiful smiles and the congratulations and illusions that a person could have.So that Monday afternoon, needed to clear me and better site than a film and there we had to go to click, a comedy by Adam Sandler, which I will now analyse in depth but notice how important that was in my life that insignificant film, that the first thing that appeared on my face when I left the room was again a smile and a slight but promising hope that everything eventually will do well and I lograré as a workaround. So to all those detractors on the big screen that consider that a waste of money is to go on weekends to watch a movie, I can tell you that sometimes those five euros you can change the life or not, not what, but at least they help to make it more beautiful and I that love him every day.As for the movie, Click has the problem that happens to most of the comedies, if you like Adam Sandler as it is my case you love and if not not worth going to see. Never can be in term medium, it has such as extreme touches in their gags and its ironies, that it was impossible to stay unnoticed, you like or you don't like.In my case, I love but also seems to me that it is appreciated that a person committed to a kind of cinema and take it out without being influenced by the fashion of the moment and with the sole purpose of making people laugh and have important things that happen in everyday life.As always, it is accompanied by a nice actress such as Kate Beckinsale which is spectacular in this comic branch and relies on a story very common but that thanks to the gags and the development of the plot itself makes it constantly fun and also that you feel reflected although overly counts in some of the things that it represents.The downside of the film is that you going of fun moments to dramatic moments in a matter of minutes and perhaps would have been more convenient to rationalize this dramatic burden so that the story would have been more fluid and the viewer would have followed her more easily. I prefer not to mention David Haselhoff, judge for yourself when you see. And by the way where is Rob Schneider? I was not able to see it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3019

Alvaro Oliva

Death Proof

muchocine

It will delight the good lovers of the talks, the stories something geeks and good film, because if something knows how to make Tarantino (so far), is good cinema.

Quentin Tarantino returns to movie theatres, with a jewel that has divided audiences and critics. As it can be deduced, I am among those who have been left to fascinate with its new proposal, with its clear style, and even more so when it has Kurt Russell as the protagonist. Yes, the husband of Goldie Hawn (and father of Kate Hudson) is one of my favorite actors, and see him in "Death Proof", with his car to the test of death, is a point that impairs the balance.Taking this film as a unique (to come separated from "Planet Terror"), I have to say that Tarantino presents the same story twice, which are two groups of girls which are subjected to the macabre game of the "Mike specialist", although with different results.While I most liked the first one, the second is not to get lame, that both are filled with magnificent dialogues, clear references and winks moviegoers, and memorable characters.Another point that makes me tilt the balance, and I do not know if many will be noticed, is the appearance of the shirt which leads Jack Burton (Kurt Russell) in "Blow to the Chinese small", great masterpiece by John Carpenter, and appears a few seconds in the bar manager of Warren (the own Tarantino, who in addition to acting has been commissioned to photograph)(, like Rodriguez in "Planet Terror").The action scenes have a very great importance in the film, but unlike "Kill Bill (volume 1)", in which action abounded in detriment of the dialogues, "Death Proof" gives us these discussions tarantinianas, in which a myriad of topics, with prose as only the director of "Pulp Fiction" knows write. Attention to Kurt Russell reciting you the poem to "Butterfly" Vanesas Ferlito, talks of the girls in the car and in the bar, the great Michael Parks and her son "number 1" in the hospital cafeteria scene "Reservoir Dogs" touch to the scene about sex in which Rosario Dawson seems to embody her role as teenager in "Kids" againLarry Clark, or conversations between "specialist Mike" and Pam (Rose McGowan) prior to show her that your car does honor to the title of the film.There are people that has been unhappy and it is bored, while it is true that the version we have seen in Spain is the extended (because of the incomprehensible far to destroy "Grindhouse", that should be seen in all its glory, and this is with "Planet Terror" and the fake trailers that created for the project), but even so, "Death proof" will delight the good lovers of the talks, the stories something geeks and good film, because if something knows how to make Tarantino (so far), is good cinema.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/388

Verolindapechocha

Monster house

muchocine

Monster House had been very well as one of the Amazing Stories of the 1980s Spielberg, but not a long of this century.

The main reason to see Monster House (2006), or the House of the scares, as it has been titled in Spanish, was the Steven Spielberg production credit. After all, the fabulous animated film Shrek occurred under the signature of DreamWorks, when the company was owned by Mr. Spielberg. And with that expectation ahead, Monster House is just regular.The story is about the House of an elderly neighbor grump who comes to life and wants to put an end to all forms of life in the neighborhood. And for all forms of life we refer to the three pre-teens protagonists, since apparently the animators they forgot that more than three people live in a neighborhood.The humanization of the House is great, that I will not cut credit. And I suppose it would have been much better to see (hear) with the original voice of Kathleen Turner, but I had to see it dubbed. The character of the macabre elder, Mr Nebbercracker, also highlights. But the creatures. Oh, the creatures (Yes, those of the poster, the protagonists, Heroes). They seemed poorly raised, enforced and unfriendly. Hardly, if one is not identified with the heroes can well enjoy the film.Monster House had been very well as one of the Amazing Stories of the 1980s Spielberg, but not a long of this century. Above all, coming after the very successful premieres of Cars and neighbors invaders, fences that you were very high.Another executive producer of Monster House is the sidekick of Spielberg, Robert Zemeckis, who has very good as Forrest Gump or the Naúfrago movies and some very bad as Gothika or the House of wax. So both names in the credits, although extremely promising, can lead us also to the disappointment. Nothing is guaranteed in the 7th. art.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3002

Emilio Calvo de Mora

El ultimátum de Bourne

muchocine

More than recommended tape of action. Greengrass prints the appropriate pace, the plot does not lose time on useless issues and Damon, in his role, serves modern action hero with sobriety, without excesses. Nor do I believe that he knew.

Valuable of this blockbuster is that it does not fool the viewer and poses a direct intrigue, refugee in a series of codes that facilitate the understanding of the complete series. Bourne is not the hero of the traditional western ambushed a reality that surpasses him: is Shane nor William Munny, vulnerable and sensitive adults gunmen still relevant resources of bully made them fearsome. The plot of the trilogy leads the story upside down. Bourne flees not from the past: what he wants is to understand it. The plot is more complex than usual in these cases, but either need a crash course in semiotics or a closet full of Cahiers du Cinema in native language. Bourne, a correct Matt Damon, is the James Bond of this 21st century, the action hero oo7 could have been case that his writers had covered the stories of a more careful invoice. Here there is bad and there are good: the difference from similar doneness cinema is that it ensures the fidelity of the Viewer (in the style of 24, the exceptional series television or even Collateral, the last great thriller) thanks to a fine of causes and ups and downs warp, pieces well-organized whose sole purpose is to dilate the outcome and entertain, and how, during the proposed trip.Detailed biographical reconstruction of the murderer Bourne offers a greedy itinerary: journey almost half the world to complete the puzzle. Nothing new, but what fascinates in this installment (and to a lesser extent in the previous two) is the stubborn pursuit of truth, the epic breath that infused the argument of heroic connotations and us friendship with an ambiguous character, past reprehensible, but honestly compelled to find its name, its history, the reasons for which kills and it is sought to make him kill.Without respite, the droves of action scenes complies with more than the usual ration of technically perfect, eye-catching images to new American cinema, needed a loyal clientele who pay the entry and buy on the way, the enormous flood of merchandising to use us customary.In these times of terror alerts and abstruse cybernetic stories of viruses and Trojans Imperial (the jungle 4.0) touches the domestic closeness of the series, his melodramatic indisimulada vocation. The Bourne Ultimatum is a recommended film that sees burdened its primacy in these rankings of best films of the year by being included in a genre often ignored, which turns confidently to make box office and sounding box. I have contributed with taste.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1017

Oscar Cantero

Nueve reinas

muchocine

An original history of scammers that combines the social denunciation with the entertainment, with a perfect Assembly between the two which makes it an important attraction for the Viewer.

Aware of that may sound repetitive to have read any other written mine on Argentine cinema, I again insist that the serious economic crisis in the country has served to spur the filmmakers, which has greatly exacerbated his wit and transmission capacity, on the basis of his argument in many cases something derived from that juncture. While at other times the issue is exposed harshly and leaving little room to smile (e.g. in El Polaquito), here is the issue with major bloating, so while frame in the dramatic genre, also has touches of comedy.Nine Queens narrates the story of two con men medium hair to them occurs a unique opportunity to sell a valuable collection of stamps to a mobster on the verge of being deported from the country. And it does so in a tone of extreme drama, using sometimes a subtle irony to glimpse the influence Spanish in the economic situation of the country. But it does without it note too, in specific details such as the fact that in many scenes showing own crisis scenarios (people agolpada against a bank intervened to try to recover their savings), appears just beside a Telefónica running a toda mecha Office. Or that the mafioso who are about to expel from the country by corrupt politicians and appropriating huge amounts of money also is, as they say, gallego.In addition to being a film denouncing the situation of the Argentina again, it is a tape that entertains, arouses curiosity by the original of the Wiles and tricks used to fleece the people, and that starts on many occasions the smile of the Viewer.Also at times resorted to symbolism, as in the scene (don't worry that what I am about to say has any relevance in the argument, it is not spoiler) that while travelling one of the protagonists in a subway car, a kid offers travelers prints in exchange for a donation, and the scammer raises the possibility of choosing between fifty pesos (about 15 euros) and a car of toy you just bought; the boy, after looking at the car, with bright eyes take the ticket: the need is higher than the whims of children of another child who has had to do more before time.But not all lights; Sometimes it gets a little predictable, and seems they wanted to give a touch of Hollywood, weighed part of this characteristic and charming Argentine pace. In any case, is a good film, which as usual, went through Spain with lower impact of the well-deserved. But that, unfortunately, is most common.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2857

Andrés Pons

Cabeza de muerte

muchocine

One of the best comedies released in recent years. If not the you take seriously you can paste a good laugh.

It is is one of the best comedies released in recent years, what is really worrying is that it was intended to be a horror film.Because the Irish PADDY BREATCHNACH author among other absurdities as BLOW DRY, apparently it took happy mushrooms to build an argument quite incredible, more surprising is to get funding to film a story of hanging that roam giving screams in the middle of nowhere. Four kids removed from television more than frightened seems that they wonder what balls I am shooting?.To hide break us the eardrums music at full speed, as bad as the director, cast, script and everything in general.If not the you take seriously you can paste a good laugh. A 3.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2697

Bruji

Ratatouille

muchocine

With the intention? limpérrima? inherent in these products, intelligent humor that characterizes his writers and the continuous references to the classics of animation, the Pixar returns to win the game.

An effective career of Fund of irregular home, care, development and an apotheosis outcome. With the intention to "limpérrima" inherent in these products, intelligent humor that characterizes his writers and the continuous references to the classics of animation, the Pixar returns to win the game. At times, the spectator forgets that, in Paris, are the rats which cooked.At this point in the film, little trusts this servant of the good intentions that accompany the American creators of the new school when they focus their stories away from its borders. A mistrust which, in his day, was widely justified with titles like my great wedding Greek (Joel Zwick, 2,002), Lost in Translation (the daughter of 2003) or under the Sun of Tuscany (Audrey Wells, 2003). And it is that, after a wacky comedy, Miss Coppola and a delicious romantic tale, revealing rebellion did transcend, to shame, the topical and distorted image given by Americans of the various peoples and cultures visited. All this, of course, seasoned with a great sense of humor (humor), that names "fool capirote" to one that does not understand.I am afraid that the custom has come to "Dibujilandia". We know that a desktop, in which the trajectory of the talks is unknown came out extraordinary titles such as bug's life, monsters, Inc. and Finding Nemo; and more than likely, however much it to strive in mislead the Distributor, that arose the history of the rat Cook of a walk through the fields of Mars. Only already are in charge of dressing the dish so that on our next visit to Paris, we refrain to call a master host that lurks its innumerable gardens "rat".RA-ta-tuí, as they require us to pronounce in Spanish, because its clumsy beginnings two fashion film, rescued from the best classics, to be, in recent years, painfully used. He is voice-overs and a lengthy flashback which justifies the story of the protagonist rodent. Also to a dangerous approach to one of the titles of the competition, neighbors invaders of noticeably inferior to the Pixar productions quality, brilliance and depth. Exceeded the unpromising home, missing the annoying voice of French accent in off and forgetting that the story is due to some facts of the past, the narrative structure takes a perfect linearity enabling the deployment of the magic. The studied faces of eyes always human, able to excite those who already lost last dandelion milk, creating fun and intelligent situations, the continuous references to lovers and exemplary lessons, will do the rest; to accommodate an apotheosis end with a declaration of principles of required reading for the criticones. By the way, appreciate a slight variant of Chaplin famously said, "If you institutions on what you leave behind, will not see what you have before". We are witnessing the bizarre flight of a restaurant, that reminds us of the adventure of the crab Sebastian with the Palace Cook. We discovered the "lower depths" of the French capital, after having known from the heights, thanks to the Hunchback of Notre Dame. We understand the danger involved in entering other unbeknownst fascinating worlds, and the importance of the family, inheritance of Ariel. We know a peculiar fairy godmother, who, at all times, trying to do we understand the true meaning of the word "self-esteem". We wonder if "there is a better place to dream that you Paris", while looking at the movie in white and black that replaces the operatically runway with a railway station, in which, possibly, Ilsa and Rick gave a last goodbye. We return to the banks of the Seine, in which all say I Love You to the rhythm of a beautiful soundtrack that an American devoted to Paris. And we got to worship a neat and hackneyed, rat with bland face of Coco of Sesame, giving testimony that "great artists can come from anywhere".All of which, leads us to the conviction that, with or without double intentions and/or spirit of mockery, the "adults screenwriters" have much to learn dibus designers. In the end, "anyone can cook!".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2841

Rafa Ferrer

El señor de la guerra

muchocine

At the end of a strange feeling of coldness crosses the body of the Viewer.

Once completed the movie have been walking through the network in search of opinions and is that when this has just one stays cold, cone, who does not know to say and do not know where start, it is true that it is very well shot and that transmits (little, the truth), Nicolas Cage is in his typical role as always and that both Jared Letto (which I remember as the "Panic room" of Fincher Raoul) and Bridget Moynahan "women vase" in a role intended for Monica Bellucci, ah! Ethan Hawke I forgot, but it is coming out so little that it is normal that one forget completely of him.With screenplay and direction by Andrew Nicoll (the author of the script for "The truman show" "S1M0NE" and "The terminal") that the truth is that I quite like it, the film is "something sosita".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3986

Rafa Ferrer

Olvídate de mí

muchocine

Finally, a beautiful film with a staff of excellent actors Kirsten Dunst, Mark Ruffalo, Elijah Wood, Tom wilkinson... and with a soundtrack of dreamy...

The producer FOCUS has presented some time this part some of the best films I've had occasion to see, theirs are titles as "Lost in translation" "21 grams" and now this "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind" directed by Michael Gondry known for my as the director of one or another music video including Bjork and also by his opera prima "Human Nature" a comedy quite fun. If to this we add you the talents of Charlie Kaufman screenwriter and director of many of the best films I've seen in a long time we have a guaranteed success.And to loop the loop my favorite actor, Jim Carrey, is true that Carrey will not leave anyone indifferent, or hate you or you love, has no medium term, can not be 50% with him, and there are two "Jim Carrey's" comic actor of films as "The mask" "Two very stupid fools" and the more recent "like God" or quasi-dramatic actor of tapes as "Man on" "the moon" "The Truman show" "The Majestic" and this that brings us.For me one of the best movies of 2004, tape, undoubtedly is a masterpiece, with an opening of impressive credits, after 10 min. Movie Flipalo! With a theme of Beck "Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometimes" course appears on the soundtrack, and the touch that Carrey gives its interpretation is a sad man, abandoned, broken, torn apart. All have suffered to a greater or lesser extent a sentimental break and we can put on the skin of Joel (Jim Carrey) when he sees that you can not forget Clementine (an excellent Kate Winslet) and even though in principle struggle to remove the mind realizes that the love he feels for her is much stronger than any rancor. Truth is of those movies that you finish see and you have left the heart in a fist, with tears in his eyes, also actors speak in a tone of voice low, almost whispering and everything you say you burn fire in the mind, if I had to stay with some of the phrases I heard I would be with this: "How innocent virgins are happy!"The world forgetting by the forgotten world: eternal shine of a perfect mind."Each prayer accepted and each with resignation". Tremenda! Had I been goose bumps to hear her.Finally, a beautiful film with a staff of excellent actors Kirsten Dunst, Mark Ruffalo, Elijah Wood, Tom wilkinson. and with a soundtrack of your dreams. In addition to what I have already said.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3287

Txapulin

Stardust

muchocine

This film has been a real surprise. Expected me a child movie full of special effects and familiar faces and I found a rather youthful film with an adult and ironic humor that reminds "The Princess Bride".

This film has been a real surprise. Expected me a child movie full of special effects and familiar faces, just to hang out, and I found a rather youthful movie, Yes, full of special effects and familiar faces, but with a very successful history, good characters well interpreted, and ironic humour reminiscent of another fairy tale of humor: the Princess Bride. When seeing the letters at the end, I saw that the film is based on a novel by Neil Gaiman, for a moment crossed me wires and thought that it was the same author that the Princess Bride, but, the latter is not William Goldman, and are of different generations. The novel the Princess Bride is 1973 and the novel Stardust is 1997, and guess that the latter owes a lot to the first. It tells the story of a character born from the relationship between two different worlds. on the one hand the village of Wall, which, as its name indicates, is close to a wall which marks the boundary between England and the imaginary world of Faery, where is the Kingdom of Stormhold. You only need to mislead the guardian of the wall to enter the world where witches and the princes are fighting and killing among them to achieve immortality or the reign. Immortality comes if you get the heart of a star, and the reign will be for one of the heirs to find a flying and elusive diamond that has been lost among the stars. Both elements converge in Yvaine, the character of Claire Danes, who will be prosecuted by the ambitious throughout the film, including the protagonist, who also want a star for handing over her to his beloved, only that in this case the circumstances will change radically.The film is littered with stars (in Hollywood, in this case), although they are mostly in supporting roles. Michelle Pfeiffer is a witch in search of eternal youth. This woman you must put the same makeup when you old witch where rejuvenates, because it is equal to that in the witches of Eastwick, and that twenty years ago. Robert de Niro is an ambiguous pirate captain (mmmm for what sounds like?) of a flying boat which will collect rays of storm. Peter O'Toole (which is everywhere lately) is the dying King of Stormhold. One of his sons is Rupert Everett. Ian McKellen (who is also on all sides) is the Narrator. And the beautiful (that not so good actress) Claire Danes in the role of shooting star. The rest of performers are less known.On the film itself, the film elements not highlighted, but it is because they are at the service of the story, not to highlight, as it should be. The sets and costumes are very well. The special effects are good when they are funds or 3D models, but they sing the effects 2D (smoke, fire, refulgencias, etc.). The music is markedly epic, so much that it almost calca and mixes part of Pirates of the Caribbean and the Lord of the rings. As I have said, the brighter is the script, the story full of very good details of humor, that does not prevent adult references sex, and the definition of the characters, and a rhythm and a plot that converge in a beautiful final fairy tale so magical as original.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4087

Iñaki Bilbao

Caramel

muchocine

Endearing though something little film co-produced between Lebanon and France.

Endearing though something little co-produced film between Lebanon and Francia.Y when I say little is not because do not like, that he liked in the past Donostia (2007) International Film Festival, winning the popular and prestigious awards of youth and the public, but because, really, it is not very good to say, at least not as good as they could indicate such awards.But it is heart-warming, is full of sympathetic characters, nearly all of them positive, and the script plays several important issues, all of them relating to the situation of women in Lebanon and in the Arab world in general.Plays the theme of the liberation of women, of their difficulties to find work, of its place in the macho society, with its outdated but rooted customs, such as who should get Virgin to marriage.Drama and humor combine well, although the movie as I say is somewhat scarce in the technical section.A nice picture that hooked to the public. Something will be, I'm not saying that no, although to my me disappointed somewhat, sobre all because I saw the last day of the Festival, precisely in the "Winner of the award to the youth and public" section. And of course, if you see after learning that has won these two prestigiosísimos Awards, you stay a piece.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2642

Kiko de España

Isi Disi: Alto voltaje

muchocine

Unbearable hodgepodge of the comic pair less evenly and less comic on the national scene. Cannot be a film with Arévalo in the 21st century.

I swallow the unbearable hodgepodge of the comic pair less couple and fewer comic on the national scene.Often cluster of nonsense this sequel without imagination, without a script. and without locations (!), approximately 90% of the footage is indoors.Directs this time Miguel Angel Lamata, who had debuted with the most entertaining (though equally bad) one of zombies.In the end, the director and his team have seen Zoolander and the two movies of Wayne´s world and a bit of comedy USA type Dodgeball to shoot an infumable film that lasts 85 minutes (thank God) and has no any kind of estructura.¿Montaje? Removed, removed.Cannot be a film with Arévalo in the 21st century.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4341

Emilio Martín Luna

No es Pais para viejos

muchocine

It is not round, but, for me, is a great movie, displays that good cinema with little can be done, and that the important thing is a good idea and people with quality about to translate it.

Making a memory exercise, I come all films of the Coen brothers, different to the norm, of varied genres, films based on atypical places and diverse characters. A film different therefore with seal itself, for good or bad, the Coens are faithful to his origins and his films always have the classic aúrea that distinguish them from the average of independent American cinema (if you can call movies indie which make the Coens, perhaps less budget). Ultimately a film, whose films are most cult, El Gran Lebowski, Barton Fink, death among the flowers and the great Fargo, are a good sample of the talent in the direction of these brothers (although in most is his brother Joel which directs and Ethan is responsible for the screenplay). Now this month of February we will be his latest creation, the multi No Country for Old Men, praised by the critical American and very serious contender to win the Oscar for best foreign film (although who cares awards.)also in its cast have to Javier Bardem in a great role and it will report no less recognition of both praise and awards.After seeing the close-up, the prologue with the voice of Tommy Lee Jones, comes to mind the three burials of Melquiades Estrada, southern USA, border with Mexico Earth, desiertos.para start the photography is fantastic, you permeates the heat in the area, creates an uncomfortable land and so makes it you feel your address, long flat, many silences and (varied) characters as real as you take a stroll through Texas. The plot is simple well linked, perhaps somewhat slow for the public of a foot used to action even if you have a meaningless, and perhaps it could show somehow light and fluid, but then wouldn't the Coen.El distribution of first order, special mention for Josh Brolin, reborn as a serious actor, Tommy Lee Jones sensational, credible, thoughtful. A Bardem eats the camera as a ruthless killer, a man with principles (though go principles that spends) it gets you very afraid and produces a tension without equal, he and his "weapon" clear. I would also like to mention the actress Kelly Mc Donald, which get little on screen, but seems very successful as the wife of Llewelyn Moss (Brolin). The story is fragmented into three parts: flight Llewelyn, the search for the murderer and the investigation of our police (Tommy Lee) and van alternating during the duration of the film, and as said before perhaps not with a 1920x1080p my I like so in some time slows down the pace.It is not round, but, for me, is a great movie, shows that good cinema with little can be done, and that the really important thing is a good idea and people with quality around them to translate it, and the Coens, will get their way, because they have done another classic which will mark the beginning of year and will have their reward in the advertising campaign of awards.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3548

Kiko de España

Flipado sobre ruedas

muchocine

Hot Rod will be in the Top 5 comedies this year just. Plenty of references, rhythm and anthological jokes. The USA comedy is in spate. Yuhú!

Hot Rod is a classic. It is again the same old story (very sandleriano that collect money doing the donkey to save the life of a be hated! for so continue whoring in the future) but works like never before.Is directed by Akiva Schaffer, curtidísimo on SNL and starring Andy Samberg, comic gradually made a hole in the show and created this peculiar universe between Napoleón dynamite and Ron Burgundy.La movie comes to mind of Lorne Michaels and Will Ferrell, okay?, and is designed to make "burst of laughter" (sentence of my memories of video store)(I just rescued.) the Footloose generation / Karate Kid based on, as say Sr.Toldo, pocho humor. And for that it uses much mythical songs of Europe. Varias.SI tell you that Bill Hader (who will be in the long-awaited Tropic Thunder) is SUPER and there is a scene that Will Arnett is like probably start babear. And the title of the post is by a stunning scene that saw what didn't let's see colleague, where is my car? While this last pending complete revision.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4165

Ana Belén Pacheco

Posdata: te quiero

muchocine

The tape is irregular and tries to insert comedy and drama with ups and downs in the script. Is a product, unfortunately, surplus.

American comedies are all equal. It's fascinating as they also manage to attract world-class actors to make them. PS I Love You is a clear example. With a later Hilary Swank and a fashion gGrard Butler the thing has safe box office. Also given that it was shot in just 45 days it is easy to insert between major productions.Gerard plays Gerry, an adorable Irishman who is married to Holly. After an escenita of anger and uncredited Gerry dies of a tumor. But Gerry is a great guy and has decided to leave letters to his wife to help her overcome her loss. Each of them has specific instructions to meet the new Holly post-Gerry and end up with PS. I Love You (PS, I love) that gives title to the tape and rescued from novel by Cecelia Ahern.La tape is irregular and tries to insert comedy and drama with ups and downs in the script. His main actress does not believe what makes any scene and seems to be clear that the field of the tragicomedy not goes with it. Gerard Butler makes desperate attempts between Leonidas and the Phantom of the Opera wearing Palm and singing in almost all of his scenes.Is a product, unfortunately, surplus.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3156

Rafa Ferrer

High School Musical

muchocine

I'm not an expert on music, just would like to say that I did not like, it bored me greatly and I prefer me you chop a bee have to swallow this kind of movies.

I have never liked "real image" in Disney films, perhaps, exceptions such as "Mary Poppins", "My friend the fantásma" or "Herbie" always I have bored as an Oyster, to the other side of the Moon from Mickey Mouse, so when last Friday, my wife began to see this film, I, revolcado on the couchas a result of a gastronteritis, the only thing I did was change slightly on side, listening, meditanto and almost contemplating the last round pot of Disney; already we have the typical Teen film, accompanied by a soundtrack glib, which hopes to sell (and that it will sell) discs and more discs, and where actors, chavalitos cut by the same pattern of Justin Timberlake or Hillary Duff, take part of the singer voice (never better said) of the plot, calcada sometimes Grease (a which fails or to the bottom of the shoes), or West Side Story (ahem), and intends to keep the kids glued to the screen.Anyway, I'm not an expert on music, just would like to say that I did not like, it bored me greatly and I prefer me you chop a bee have to swallow this kind of movies.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1934

Marta

El jefe de todo esto

muchocine

Von Trier satirises the film process, labour relations and appearances in a hilarious movie, with absurd dialogues, strange characters and disparate situations.

I guess that there is no better time to talk about "The Chief of all this" the day of the worker. The last film by Lars Von Trier premiered in Spain revolves around a company whose owner decides to hire an actor to make go through the real boss, that he has hidden his office employees. And this time isn't a great drama of those to which we are accustomed to the Danish director, but just the opposite. Laughed I not remember having so much film in a very long time. Von Trier satirises the film process, labour relations and appearances, possibly in a much more autobiographical way so that I can appreciate. And it does so by absurd dialogues, strange characters and disparate situations. A risky bet, that could have given rise to a stupid movie filled with topics and easy jokes and that, however, it turns out to be a hilarious comedy with many unexpected twists. Between the obsession of the actor to make each of his sentences in a historical interpretation, Chief cocoon with pint of good-natured (and Peter, "Family guy" voice in the Spanish dub), the cries of the Icelandic entrepreneur and the rarities of the Office as a whole, "The Chief of all this" not too has to envy to the Coen brothers or Woody Allen comedies. Of course, Lars Von Trier does not remain quiet if you do not experience. What she has already made clear with the dogma "Idiots" or the scenarios of "Dogville" and "Manderlay", among other things. On this occasion, there are who can bother you that the director has dared to interrupt the action with their explanations on the narrative structure of the comedy in voice-over, or forget voluntarily camera, giving rise to those curious frames. To me, personally, I like these jueguecitos that break the monotony of the image and give a more fresh air to the final result. It is very likely that "The Chief of all this" is not valued and deserves to go down in history as one minor in the Filmography of the director works, lost among its large, deep dramones. It is not that they look me bad movies, but when I saw Emily Watson, Björk and Nicole Kidman play the same role of "poor defenseless individual before cruel and powerful society", I cannot help but start thinking that Von Trier is a little tiresome, who knows only shoot the same over and over again and that its main objective is to demonstrate his mastery when it comes to suffering the Viewer. Work such as this do not lose hope that is capable of much more.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3755

Iñaki Bilbao

Deseo, Peligro

muchocine

Estimable Ang Lee film, linking thriller and Eroticism in an attractive and suffocating peculiar love story.

Good Ang Lee film, returns to demonstrate his heterodoxy in genres, changing from one to another as likes the story you want to tell in pictures.On this occasion, get a good product thanks to a measured and studied screenplay, fruit of Eileen Chang and James Schamus.La story, superbly manufactured from the formal point of view, with a perfect atmosphere thanks to a commendable and easy task for make-up, costumes, hairdresser, a surround soundtrack conducted by Alexandre Desplat and art direction, both indoors and outdoorsIt has a classic and at the same time modern taste. Classic on the modus narrative, taking his time to show the various characters and their psychological evolution through the past and modern time as regards the steamy sex scenes, amazing in a conventional Asian cinematography.All this leads to a footage that could brand of excessive, not in vain lasts longer than two hours and a half. But it must be said that it not tired at all and interest not only not lapses over the footage but is on the rise. But it is true that the final part stretches a poquillo more thing due, but not too.Interpretations are vital in this more than estimable film which, let us remember, won the Golden Lion in Venice last. Both Tony Leung, as introverted as we usually see him and Wei Tang, in a role that no doubt it brings them, very demanding in all aspects.Without a doubt, "I, danger" is not the masterpiece that any / as they say, but it is an important work, which is completely worthwhile and has excellent scenes, hard to forget, as frank with Hsiao floor, the former friend of the Chief of the command, so to speak. "Scene which is not original as much drink of the most remembered"Curtain Rasgada", master Hitchock.""Desire, danger", an estimable thriller with juicy scenes of sex, perhaps at the end may be disappointing to some viewers and say at the end of the same as "then go for it". And is that the end is the most realistic as possible, but not the taste of the majority, probably.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3824

Carlos Giacomelli Puig

Dragon Wars

muchocine

They are only saved the twenty minutes of spectacular struggle in L.A., which although quite remind "Tranformers", still working a charm, having fun like few. Too bad that it is completely insufficient.

Hyung-rae Shim writes and directs an epic story in which everything has a place: a curse, dragons and giant snakes, and the U.S. Army.Journalist Ethan discovers one of his recordings it seems a giant reptile scales. He is immediately family, remember how small saw something similar in an antiques shop, in which its owner explained that the same Ethan was the protagonist of a myth which is repeated every five hundred years. According to legend, two giant snakes, a good and another bad, leave their caches to catch up with a girl that generation after generation is born a dragon mark on his shoulder. She contains the necessary element for the snake to find earlier is transformed into a dragon and reach the Kingdom of heaven where he remained for the next five hundred years. or something like that.The idea of placing a struggle between dragons and army in a city so impressive as it is Los Angeles in advance was a stimulating proposal. Feeling that he confirmed to watch spectacular trailers circulating in the network, where cuttings as reflected in some special effects, eye-catching and very careful. Even the argument might be, how much less, curious, to adapt a legend of sur-coreana culture to the present day. Unfortunately, the end result is a real disappointment, because there is no where to take "D-War".There are many bugs that embrutecen the film, in the majority of its aspects. The actions are all deplorable, with special reference to Jason Behr (Ethan) and Robert Forster (who plays the owner of the antiquarian and mentor of the protagonist). I don't know what would be thinking of casting directors, although well is true in a movie so neither is seeking work oscarizables. Another important burden is the entire Assembly. Flat cut meaningless, flash-backs of flash-backs (at the beginning especially) that are not only ridiculous, if not making it one to lose the head, are just a couple of examples of the visual gibberish that we are witnessing. They are only saved a couple of shots in which, through clumsy zooms and quivering filming, you get some (impossible) realism, as if it were a documentary.But where is more emponzoña "Dragon Wars" in his script. Empty and little stimulant, moves around all the clichés of popcorn cinema by resorting to absurd situations that have no feet or head (see the time that boy and girl Kiss, having known only few hours before and with a giant snake chasing them) and constant references to "Jurassic Park" or "King Kong". It is impossible to take this movie seriously, but is that even without doing so, we cannot accept such absurdities.The truth is that this film both promised, at the end only are they saved the twenty minutes of spectacular struggle in L.A., which although quite remind "Tranformers", still working a charm, having fun like few. Too bad that it is completely insufficient. Do not lose time.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3358

Ana Belén Pacheco

Mi Hermano Es Hijo Único

muchocine

For those who want to know with what you will find is my brother is only son is a species of?Tell me? with all its virtues and defects. In fact more virtues than faults.

Accio is a young man without direction. Small leaves, family chagrin, the seminar returning home where he realizes that siblings are appreciated and loved him. Soon find a way to feel integrated in a world which seems that it spins much faster than himself. He enlisted in the neo-fascist party by the influence of a family while his brother Manrico leads the leftist revolutions and leads social movements and strikers from his small town (Latin, fifty kilometres south of Rome).The ideology but the camadarería will get that both do not lose their ties over politics or love Accio professed towards his brand new and successful older brother's girlfriend. Accio soon after their journey Mussolinesco realizes social implications and the actions of its movement give a twist to his life linking it over to Manrico and of course the bride from East looking for family recognition which never comes. Accio is a touching character who lives in the shadow of a brilliant and charismatic brother and that is lost during the entire film until at the end get found himself (in the most literal sense of the word). But if there is something that characterizes the characters is that they are true to themselves. Once I heard an idea that could be summed up the vital political journey of any medium Spanish: "We are all idealistic until the 1940s." "Then we are right-wing or start looking to be idealistic and stupid at the same time." Let's say that Accio is consistent with the time that live you and like many others opt for the inverse way already to 1960s and 70 (which are set in the tape) had political repercussions in Italy very similar to the Spanish. As he himself admits at times "a fascist nella famiglia é comodo".For those who want to know with what you will find is my brother is only son is a species of "Tell me" with all its virtues and defects. In fact more virtues than faults. Thanks to the success achieved in Italy and the festivals that have been reaching our rooms and help that finally another movie poster that share its protagonists, Romanzo Criminale, release in our country in January of next year. THE movie data: Is a very free of the "fasciocomunista" novel adaptation (Il Fasciocomunista), Antonio Pennacchi Ramakrishna 5 Donatello awards from 11 nominations and public Un Certain Regard. Cannes Film Festival ' European Film Festival 07Sevilla. Section Oficial.Fue No. 1 at the box office in Italy, with EUR 8 million of revenue in less than a month

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2639

Tito Chinchan

Los chulos

muchocine

Yet another film of this Spanish comedy duo, with a facing the demon Esteso Pajares Pius. Social criticism on the Spain of the Egyptians (that the left hand doesn't know what the right) decorated with typical topics and, of course, tits and ass.

If this were the bulls, we could say that there is a good sign. Three women in porretas in submissive positions, Ozores mafia smiling white suit, and lofts with the face of a giant fart be enduring. Not to mention Ricardo Merino, Juanito Navarro, Alfonso del Real, María Isbert and Jenny Llada (do not know anything, which I assume it is despelotará). They are no longer posters like these, which summarized us perfectly what we are going to see. Pity. the film is about a businessman in the sector of Vice and the so-called fornication Felix Rebolledo (Esteso), who decides to open a House of mental and physical relaxation in a village of the deep Spain. As we know that you have to be good with the forces of the same, through bribes, good carnal, either tangible, get have them all eating of his hand. But ete here the problem, which appears a such Arcadius (Pajares), nephew of the Bishop (Juanito Navarro), who has been expelled from the seminar by excess of Pius. It quickly leads a rebellion against the local festivals, supported by the women of the living forces.Give joy to your body Macarena, which your body is pa to give joy and good thing. Eehhhh, Macarena, ajú!. This has nothing to do, but as the film does rhyme or reason, because it is consistent. Let's start with the script, quite sencillote as it should be. Ozores wants that catch Pajares in unseemly position, so it covers of tits and ass to see if pica. It is rumored Pajares required doubles for this type of scenes, given that in the essay he preñó three. The action is fast-paced, from tit to tit, get us some chistecillo and enjoyable joke. And rare is that the end is very consistent with the rest of the film.In short, yet another film of this Spanish comedy duo, with a facing the demon Esteso Pajares Pius. Social criticism on the Spain of the Egyptians (that the left hand doesn't know what the right) decorated with typical topics and, of course, tits and ass.Good material for the visual.kisses.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2791

Rafa Ferrer

Sólo tu

muchocine

Sincere designed comic so early on in which Tomei character looking for that dream "Damon Bradley", we also have curiosity to know and expect it to be so ideal for her as it thinks that it can be.

This week that, for the gigs, I sleep when the hens, my wife is using to see this kind of film which I only do not gives me hives, but which also bores me as an Oyster; Perhaps, I have to admit with a certain amount of shame that this, like some other film more, are few tapes but not get to love me, I like somehow, and it is that, although the argument is always, there are certain doses of originality, as well as a Marisa Tomei and Robert Downey Jr in a permanent state of grace.The tape, one of those movies of desktop that you can find in any television channel shift, is a sincere devised so that from the beginning in which Tomei character looking for that dream "Damon Bradley", we also have curious to know and expect it to be so ideal for her as it thinks that it can be.On the other hand, the staff side is quite "curiosete" (change to Nice), from Billy Zane, rather than stay as bald as a server, Bonnie Hunt, sister or mother of exception in countless feature films, and the Portuguese Joaquim de Almeida, in the era (talk about a tape dated 13 years ago) in which both Almeida and many other Portuguese actors crossed the pond with direction to the States.En end, it hurts to admit with some embarrassment, but I like and I don't mind to see it wherever it falls at home DVD.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1375

Jeremy Fox

Diamante de sangre

muchocine

His great triumph is the film as an allegation have been raised without forgetting of quality film-making

Dear Mr Edward Zwick: you don't know who I am I am and probably never know never. I'm just a poor goer that goes to you with the firm intention to offer you my most sincere apologies. Apologies I think necessary because for months, I have argued that you wasn't the right director to carry out a project with a theme and a very attractive actors.A few days ago, thanks to the kindness of Warner Bros. Spain and the mediation of muchocine.net, had the opportunity of seeing "Blood diamond" (Blood Diamond). My initial expectations, find me with a correct film devoid of force not could have been more wrong.Always blamed you to his films a lack of passion which, in my view, was necessary for the stories that shows: "Legends of the fall" was the great work which should have been halfway and another, to a lesser extent because their script seems lower, it could be said of "The last samurai". Don't me wrong, they are good movies, but they are not great films.In contrast, "Blood diamond"? This is cinema of truth. There they showed you all the passion that the film required. Perhaps his style is not so striking and recognizable as Spielberg and Scorsese; you are more invisible to the Viewer, but this time has given the best of himself and has managed to bring out the best in others (something very important in a director).It is true that help a great script by Charles Leavitt, entering fully on the essentials of the subject treat, without wasting time on unnecessary explanations. A script that explains the characters perfectly. A script without phrases more or less. A nearly perfect script that, perhaps, only you pantry two or three pages final (although I may not be annoying). But we destripemos nothing, that you never know who we can be reading.I congratulate you, Mr Zwick, because I believe that its actors have never been so well. The three main actors are great actors and that they are good is not difficult, it is true, but what worthwhile is not that they are good but what good are. Djimon Hounsou and Leonardo DiCaprio are incredible live their roles and make them us live, they fill the screen in an interpretative duel in height in which us Smash in the face so far that can reach a human being, albeit for very different reasons.I set aside to a Jennifer Connelly, forgotten in the awards this year, which is as well as fellow and has even greater role than I expected. To make matters worse, his scenes with DiCaprio are pure chemistry, something very difficult to see today in the cinema because it is often forgotten that the chemistry is something that comes from the brain, is the result of intelligence and cannot be achieved simply with join two hot body and show some skin. And you know, the writer knows that his actors know it; Why DiCaprio and Connelly throw sparks in this confrontation that remain among the most radical pragmatism and idealism more combative. I know I repeat myself but I can't find another way of saying it: the actors in your film eat the screen.Could tell the wonderful photography Eduardo Serra, soundtrack James Newton Howard, impressive sound or the Assembly of a Steven Rosenblum at the third maybe wins the oscar; they are all very important part in the creation of some of the most memorable action scenes of recent years.What I would be very difficult to explain, Mr Zwick, is exciting to me was his film, the heartbreaking and emotional are some of their scenes or to what extent enjoyed and suffered at the same time, seeing this portrait of what have done you to Africa for everyone. All this without feeling, at any time, that were selling me a pamphlet.Because that success in the initial approach is its great triumph: the movie as an allegation have been raised without forgetting to do whatever you have to do; film quality.Therefore, thank you Mr Zwick and we again apologize for my lack of confidence.Sincerely: Jeremy Fox.PD: If you ask my opinion, I would give his film a 9.5 on 10.PD 2: I know, he has not asked me my opinion, but the lovers are so hubristic.PS 3: in moonfleet.es can see the poster in the film Spanish if it is of interest.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1813

Rafa Ferrer

Campeonato mundial FIFA 2006

muchocine

This documentary, with a narrator of exception briefly summarizes us the best matches of all selections, with special interest in the final phase, where the drama of the semi-finals joins the lottery of the penalty. Football to tutti-plen.

Lately the DVD market is not surprising with quite juicy sports pitches, and it is that, for the football fans, the world presents a great event that happens every 4 years (come on, like the Olympics) and where the best football players come together to make life more fun (or more suffered) as you see.This documentary, with a narrator of exception, (the great 007, do not speak of Daniel Craig, but Pierce Brosnan), briefly summarizes us the best matches of all selections, with special interest in the final phase, where the drama of the semi-finals joins the lottery of the penalty.A tape that can not miss on the shelf of any amateur sport King, and that will delight all those who we had to suffer the world in "The sixth" acompado of Andrés Montes and SALIIIINAAASSS!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/848

Rafa Ferrer

The Queen

muchocine

Once we see a the film adaptation of the life, works and miracles of our Royal family?

On my recent visit to London, was one of the films was premiered this "The Queen", remember the uproar that caused the characterization of Helen Mirren as Queen Elizabeth, everytime someone lifted his head and saw the poster in London's "TheatreLand" district.The film, which tells the terrible events that occurred in London following the death of Diana of Wales, puts us in the sights, the British Royal family, both Prime Minister Tony Blair and his wife Cherie; characterized as a curious and anti-royalist woman who pushes or causes a feeling of uneasiness in her husband.Interpretive level, Helen Mirren as borda, both in their gestures, postures, and gestures and makes us believe that we are to the real Queen, and not to an actress, also James Cromwell as the Duke of Edinburgh, is superb, perhaps, is distracted, curious and more concerned with 4 jets by the difficult situation that the Royal House was living at the timeI don't want to forget about the actor who gives life to the Prince Charles of England, Alex Jennings, dealt with their children suffer as little as possible and leaving aside his exacerbante passion for another woman, doing what a future King to do.Stephen Frears, composed a portrait pretty well shot, where images of the news and the real life of the Princess of Wales, along with the authentic scenarios where all development, aid to the full likelihood of the story.I imagine that many of her you viewing have thought will ever see a the film adaptation of the life, works and miracles of our Royal family? In short, an impressive recreation of an almost as famous as our family, not the real Royal family but the House.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3261

Ramón Balcells

El espía

muchocine

A correct spy film that adds nothing new to the genre cinema, but which nevertheless unfolds successfully, especially with the incredible performance of Chris Cooper, an actor who always must be taken into account.

During the history of the American cinema we have seen real wonders about espionage, either the master or frenetismos as the own Bourne, of a more modern era. Seeing the spy I noticed that there is a justified reason why has to do this film. It is our incunvencia process of the Robert Hanssen espionage? Lol As well, with that phrase so loved and hated by some as the "based on a true story", the film of Bill Ray is sold as such, a story that happened, and that unfortunately a few we are interested in. However, the film, leisurely pace and without just action, able to keep as footage of dialogue (which rather than deep thinking) and finds a (slow) point not just disturb the Viewer.It is topical in much of the content, but does not intend to show it. Several of his scenes are enviably original, but apparent senzillez. It is not so much what you see but those looks and intimate conversations that make the spy film, rather than espionage, intellectual. It is not, nor much less, what was this wonderful second film of Robert de Niro. Fails, not even, the level of the Jason Bourne trilogy, but it has something that others do not have, something difficult to describiri, quiet, cosy cold and dry. This, also, is a clear portrait to that life so boring and dangerous spies, who play their lives as overlooking weapons. Your script is senzillo (which not bad). Does not bring anything new and interesting film spies, but that Yes, account events paused and intelligent way.The cast looks very satisfactorily, mainly the great (far side) Chris Cooper, that cooprotagoniza the film with the young Ryan Phillippe, who saw that he was already a good actor in the great Crash. Both are harmonized in a great way, form a duo interesting and very well written dialogues. Probably a little recurrence of talks between them, but this would be a minor problem. And, above all, do not forget the final moment, where both show his charisma with just looks. A true success. Although the secondary Laura Linney must not detract from, because its interpretation is, as usual, excellent.A correct spy film that adds nothing new to the genre cinema, but which nevertheless unfolds successfully, especially with the incredible performance of Chris Cooper, an actor who always must be taken into account.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/575

Jose Contreras

Serpientes en el avión

muchocine

Snakes are flooding the plane in amount disproportionate, Carnival, sometimes almost makes you smile by the size of the nonsense...

To have fun with "Snakes on a plane" should make a small effort. You have to go to the movies forgetting something between the 1970s disaster films that it has shot and now. The film does not have the credibility that asks the viewer today day, so only I can recommend to the nostalgic.I understand that bloggers took part in the decisions of the producers. I wonder if they gave him that air so delusional gore. The film begins as an episode of holidays at sea, with a parade of characters going to travel and suffer in the flight. Each one is marked with easy to remember conflict and completely cartonpiedra. Snakes are flooding the aircraft in an amount disproportionate, Carnival, sometimes almost makes you smile by the size of the nonsense you have in front of the eyes. It is the plan of a mobster who wants to kill a witness who will testify against him. It is the least. If you are still able to have fun with the airports, and forget the parody that he was made the Zucker, or with tarantulas, Piranhas and other monsters, just stop calling plausibility for an hour and half and take part in the Festival.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/623

Kiko de España

Infiltrados

muchocine

Again I recover from blow the trust that was lost with Gangs... and The Aviator.

Scorsese has become. Impressive, his best work from one of our. Pace, tension, offal.It is fast-paced, spectacular, has a masterful interpretations (huge Wahlberg) and up the old Jack Gets the line as it did from Mars Attacks!Attention to the mounting of the movie, and as looks to move the camera friend Martin, and the prologue to the outcome. Once again regain the trust that was lost with Gangs coup. The Aviator.Para see and review and to see again. A lesson in cinema. The best thriller of the year. The first Oscar as director to the Director of Taxi Driver, Goodfellas or wild Bull? A piece of 9.PD: it would still have to digest it a little more, but my serious problems IMAGÉNICOS I have gotten into a booth and while I write these lines, three large fonts, with moustache and accent of the South (of America) shout behind me. Adds a keyboard shit and delete!, me piro for House. Greetings to all.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/706

Marta

El diablo viste de Prada

muchocine

The history is absurd, and the characters are completely unrealistic. Neither writer nor director had very clear what they wanted to tell.

I don't know why, I don't do more to do reviews that aim to convince me that "the Devil Wears Prada" is a good movie, funny, with good characters and an interesting critique towards the world of fashion, when it is not anything like that. At all. For starters, the history is absurd, and the characters are completely unrealistic. Screenwriter Aline Brosh McKenna has tried to adapt the novel by Lauren Weisberger removing important aspects and adding others that have no feet or head. Just to give an example: say your co-worker is a nasty being that you insult and you despise continuously. Let's say that you want you a lot to make a trip of company, which at last moment gets sick and your boss ordered you to go in his place. Someone would feel guilty? But what kind of 'moral dilemma' is that? Come on, man. Do not you learn anything in your work? The solution is simple: Ponte brand clothing and everything will be much better. Soon you will begin to respond to the phone safely and you can even look at your teammates, hitherto despised you, over the shoulder. The truth not I saw very clear that alleged 'criticism' of the film. And nor is it just the opposite; rather, it appears that neither writer nor director had very clear what they wanted to tell. Obviously I do not think that anyone thought this was going to be something inteligentísimo, but it is not especially fun. Many other comedies this style give thousand turns. Really, I fail to understand all those views that they praise.I agree. For some reason, seeing on the screen 'transformations in Swan' always they are entertaining, and Meryl Streep and Stanley Tucci quite raise the bar, but that fails to save the final result of "the Devil Wears Prada", which is flat, predictable and simplistic. Better to spend the money on the book, which, without being a masterpiece, is, at least, much more coherent.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4237

Plissken

Sweeney Todd

muchocine

There are so many virtues of 'Sweeney Todd' the result is a spectacular musical returns us to the Burton more wild since the 1990s.

They have out there that Tim Burton took much time behind to adjust the most macabre musical by Stephen Sondheim, ' Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street', and seen the result one cannot deny that the waiting was worth. Above all to the director himself, that puts all the meat in the grill to sign his most gross film since its already brutísima ' Mars Attacks!'.The story is faithful to the musical almost at foot juntillas: Benjamin Barker, formerly a naive Barber, returns to his native London after fifteen years imprisoned for a crime he did not commit under a new identity: Sweeney Todd. Returning to his old barbershop, discover everything you had him has been snatched, and machine a vendetta against the corrupt judge that led to his disgrace. With the help of Nellie Lovett, a dark panadera, and its knife razor silver, Sweeney Todd will trigger an orgy of blood that will become more and more ruthless, reaching guilty and innocent alike.With 'Sweeney Todd', Tim Burton shows that it is one of the few Directors of Hollywood can leave aside the timidity and moral or family conventions that dominate the contemporary American cinema. The original work was an example of how evil, cynicism and amorality campan at ease by modern society, but the tricky thing was to bring that feeling of rot to the big screen in times of political correctness and self-censorship. The small miracle has acted so the Californian director, that will have happened it in big filming the degollinas of the deranged evil Barber and his repulsive accomplice.And speaking of accomplices: if John Carpenter has Kurt Russell, Tim Burton has Johnny Depp. His alter ego on screen since the days of 'Edward Manostijeras' is at home playing Sweeney Todd, brilliantly with his obsession to slopes. A new freak to add to his long list, with the exception that it can be which will serve in tray Oscar who is persecuting his entire career. And along with Depp is Helena Bonham Carter, facing the mirror perfectly Depp with a Mrs Lovett in the fine line that separates the unconditional love of the mass murder (of bread). Also include Alan Rickman and Timothy Spall as the villains of the function, and an unrecognizable Sacha Baron Cohen and a very young Ed Sanders effectively underpin the very high level of adaptation.Closing the chapter of praise, stresses (once again in the Burton film) the gloomy and oppressive atmosphere of the nineteenth-century London in charge of the legendary Dante Ferretti and the grim picture of Dariusz Wolski (see their records and tell me if Tim Burton did not choose well to his collaborators). All elements will be joining the original music of Sondheim, and the result is a spectacle of luxury at all levels.But not everything in 'Sweeney Todd' works. The big problem in adapting a musical film consists of correctly measuring the percentage of "musicality" that will have the film, and in this case Tim Burton has sinned to be too faithful to the original. For a long time that it did not see a musical so musical (easily 90% of the role is sung), and although most of the numbers are bright and are perfectly engaging in the plot, there are times where it is inevitable to feel out the sinister and hooligan spirit of the same. In particular attract attention the moments in which appear the other couple protagonist of the story, that in the musical must fulfil the role of "lyrical moments" and as a counterweight to the black adventures of Todd, but appearing in the film as downtime that, to make matters worse, result up irrelevant to the main plot.Even so, there are so many virtues of 'Sweeney Todd' the result is a spectacular musical returns us to the Burton more wild since the 1990s. Pity about the tasteless couple co-star. A 8'5.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/967

Oscar Cantero

El extraño

muchocine

Subtlety in details, superb performance and a magnificent setting showing talent neither be bought nor sold.

The truth is that I feel a little intimidated when I think that I shall make a critique of a directed and starring film who is my particular Olympus of celluloid with Joseph Cotten and Jack Nicholson. Orson Welles was a strange, Bohemian, Maverick, eventually fought with all the American film industry, which was virtually ousted by ultraprogresista ideology in a United States dominated by Semitic and conservative capital. The stranger belongs to its golden age, next time Citizen Kane and the third man (feel chills only to write these titles), shortly before that his enthusiasm for Spain take you to spend great seasons in our country together with one of his great friends, Antonio Ordóñez, on whose farm lie the remains of the great filmmaker.In the strange, Welles plays a nazi that after the war leads a quiet life under a false name in a village of America, and that a "Hunter" located in large part thanks to the fans to the clocks of the former SS, he occupies his time free to fix the Bell Tower of the town clock. Charles Rankin is the name under which hides Franz Kindler, and which will seek to catch Mr Wilson, which gives life a monster of the interpretation, as it was Edward G. Robinson. The characterizations of the characters reach insurmountable heights in the dark and gloomy appearance of Welles or the affability of the detective Wilson, who comes to make some friends with the orondo and nice clerk of the warehouse, which in turn uses to obtain some information. This contributes to the tempo of the film is slow, but at the same time dynamic in a difficult combination of factors that rarely are. The simple details of the way in which the Nazi pursuer convinces the real identity of Kindler is a subtlety unmatched. All this without forgetting the rest of the cast that shines also to a high level (especially Loretta Young, the ignorant and naive wife of the ruthless criminal). But in any case, and remain outstanding in this section, the interpretation is not the most important thing of this film.From the technical point of view it is also impeccable, and used often chopped and contrapicados of images, with a superb management of lighting and shadows, creating an atmosphere of tension and suspense of enormous intensity. These "ventures" with a depth of full script of second readings and political messages are make the stranger (also known in Spain as the alien) in a real masterpiece and inevitable reference to subsequent productions of similar Court, framed in what came to be called Film Noir (film noir).I am aware that I've done an enthusiasm disproportionate in these lines, but the fascination that has always exerted on me Orson Welles prevent me from moderate me when he is. And especially if we are talking about a wonder as this film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/812

Lara Croft

Infiltrados

muchocine

The departed is the film most overrated of the year. With good performances Yes, but without atmospheres or commitment.

Who compare infiltrators with good guys should see her again. The departed is the film most overrated of the year. With good performances Yes, but without atmospheres or commitment.The perfect Edition of Scorsese, Thelma Schoonmaker, right hand makes it worth every scene alone, but the speed with which the scenes occur does not create the necessary environment for the engagement of the viewer with some of the characters. They are very short and full (but full) scenes often unnecessary dialogues.Nicholson returns to give us one of his runaway, hysterical and unsafe characters. Di Caprio is showing signs of his talent not so easy to sprout, Scorsese sees in him the successor of De Niro and gives much free rein to develop his character. Damon does not hold with his impeccable smile to convince to be a mafia compromised in Boston and police Whalberg always in pose, never hesitant. The characters are one-dimensional, impossible to give a full figure, positioning them in spaces that give them motivation and/or reasons for doing what they do. Their actions are because they are, without place to meditate the why.The rat walking along the balcony scene clearly shows the concept which has Scorsese on the public (do American perhaps?). All easy, served in tray, clear. A film with great actors (stars), understandable and it did not disappoint in terms of action shots (blood). A critical Oscar.La film has not been charitable with "Marty" lately and is time to offset the malostratos. If to this we add an impeccable casting and grossing soundtrack, we face one of the films with more nominations for the awards ceremony in February 2007.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/642

Yul B.

Hijos de los hombres

muchocine

Film very good, a director at dazzling rise to glory, which will probably be among the best this year, but that has lacked a boil to be a masterpiece.

This is one of those few films that moves so unconventional paths in the Hollywood industry that needs to be analysed and matured once past the end credits.The conclusion that takes after the shock causes?Children of men? It is that Alfonso Cuarón has shot a film visually spectacular and realistic, moral tragic, although with hopeful ending, which forces you to reflect possible seriamente.¿Es that we agree so much decadence, and that this will lead us to a world so apocalyptic?, there will be no salvation in this chaos?.Do despite the full continent of the film, it has a number of shortcomings in the content that causes you to lose the qualification of? masterpiece?. Do do stays in? good?; Although that's remarkable considering the numerous film disappointments that we are experiencing in recent years.?Children of men?, based on a novel by the writer P.D.James, reflects a future scares. And puts it too next: in the year 2.027; in a barely recognizable London and in a time where the human race has lost the ability to procreate and faces extinction fight between the deepest misery.The only way of survival seems lost on the death of the youngest person in the world, a boy of 18 years. However, there is still a last breath of hope for the planet: the surprising existence of a pregnant woman, an immigrant that different circumstances Theo Faron (Clive Owen), a former activist emotionally crushed, will have to help to bring safe and anarchists groups guerrillas who want the baby for pure political interest.It is evident that the picture, sound, and the scenic setting and musical of the film are impressive, touching the genius. Do not saw anything like from?Saving soldier Ryan?.Cuarón masterfully exhibits an eerily real future, with devastating and shocking visual references of the most terrible phenomena socio-political of our century (terrorism, immigration and environmental crimes), whose effects we see on a daily basis, already gradually in the worldwide television news in images.How to shoot the scenes with long flat sequence, camera on his shoulder, resource in the beginning of the film may be sickening, but which then becomes vital to narrate the agonizing journey of the protagonists contributes to the realism.The ultimate expression of this reality is achieved in a somewhat disconcerting detail: a splash of blood in the House as a result of a street confrontation between the British army and the guerrillas. A very dramatic license that has a drawback: removed you the scene perfectly (was supposed that that detail would occur only in the case that a reporter was recording the incident along with the protagonist).To much accumulation of veracity chaotic and frenzied agony is appreciated before that exist during the film small moments of peace and rest, intermingled with scenes that take place in places represented with images placid, clean and quiet. Even the curious insistence of Cuaron to maintain the character of Theo tormented with shoes and his feet during your break you evades the harsh reality that is displayed.Do do do do as it can be seen, the words? realistic?,? real?,? realism? and? reality? they occur along this criticism. However, it's an adjective that could only be granted to the visual part of the film. Almost the rest of its components, he said, some fragments of the script, certain dialogues and practically most of the performances, are equally artificial, predictable and absurd, that the footage of any low category thriller.This fails the tape, unfortunately, fact that causes you to lose a step on his way to immortality.Focusing on the cast, only that is saved is Michael Caine that his role as Jasper, a last laps hippy friend of Theo borda. The other main actors are mere vehicles of the scenery, including Clive Owen, showing one dramatic charge less than his previous roles in this film.Julianne Moore is passable as the leader of an illegal organization that defends the rights of refugees. And Clare-Hope Ashitey, pregnant woman, plays its role without fanfare.In summary, a very good film, a director at dazzling rise to glory, which will probably be among the best this year, but that has lacked a boil to be a masterpiece.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/127

Jango Fett

Ice age 2 el deshielo

muchocine

Film flat, bland, without hardly argument and bad jokes

Ice Age was a great box office success and I think a large group of fans on this saga and saga I say because Ice Age 2 will not last. However, I do not belong to this group of fans and I can hardly understand the success of these movies. Ice Age 2 is a simplistic film, with very mild jokes and even some very bad times and with a very low plot burden. The biggest problem of the film is that it works as several comics together without much relationship between them, gives the impression that in the studies of this movie they said "Let's do a movie about the thaw, that everyone does a short on the subject and then join them" and this is the impression, because many of the scenes are totally unrelated to the plot of the movie. Another big problem of Ice Age 2 is that they have become to fall again on the same stone with one, the best of the movie is the squirrel (or go to know that it is this bug) that he goes looking for his Acorn, his appearance in the movie will be about six or seven times as intervals from the rest of the film, and curiously the best two of these scenes have been chosen as trailers to promote it. In the saga Ice Age rather than resorting to fast for the trailers images as they do in most films, they pick up a scene completely, put the credits at the beginning and at the end and we have trailer. This makes you start the movie and say "This already I've seen" and the truth, I do not like much this marketing technique that used to Ice Age. And new also another error that is repeated, is that the movie is totally superficial, not play just any dramatic history as they usually do in other productions of animation, see Shrek or Finding Nemo. As this happened in one, now in two is ignored almost completely abandoned history of a female mammoth who joins the team and of the obviously are trying to introduce a love story that really gives us absolutely equal, gives us equal to that she has been abandoned or have to separate from the group or whatever, and is that the movie as I say is totally flat, do not have that sentimental touch that have most animation movies. Anyway in Ice Age 2 also becomes visible that these studies are only trying to imitate the large and not to develop their own style as they did Pixar or PDI, which is why that many characters or situations resemble other productions already views. They have even tried to introduce a music number that turns out to be disastrous at least after dubbing, would be seen in original version to check it, but it is likely that it would be just as bad, as again it seems that one of the animators said that he was going to make a musical short and what they have gotten in the movie, so works like Ice Age 2. As regards animation things have not changed much, because the characters are well done but funds are extremely ugly, in fact this was very open to criticism in one, but as this is going on the melting because it is likely that they could create landscapes green and spectacular white and flat as in the first installment and indeed this make in one of the first scenes that is when it starts melting. However it seems then that the animators got tired of work and all the scenarios are land, is not much more than paint Brown ice. In short, Ice Age 2 is in my opinion a film flat, bland, without hardly argument and with bad jokes, but is certainly going to be a box office hit for the second time. If you liked the first, you will like the second, but not bother going to see, because both are equal and commit the same errors.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1255

Yojimbo

Freaks

muchocine

Mr Browning gives us to understand that many times the real monsters are not those freaks, but do normal?.

To get the day with classic this weekend I set out for Freaks, Tod Browning.Algo encouraged to see is its duration, barely at the time.The story is simple but is recounted with great skill, and simplicity (perhaps the two things go together). The dvd Edition contains a special introduction of the director that informs the viewer the nature of the term freak and his world as a collective that supports each other and who feels offended as a whole when one is despised.Precisely on that relates the story: in a circus full of attractions, particularly attract attention which are referred to as freaks or those who has unusual physical deformities.The story focuses on Hans and Frieda, a pair of dwarves who commit themselves to marry, but crosses in half the beauty of Cleopatra, a beautiful trapeze artist that Maddens Hans and turns him into a puppet. Everything flows into a cruel story of manipulation, contempt and revenge.The best of the film, and perhaps more appalling, is the parade of people mutilated and deformed. But the most impressive thing is that they are able to integrate masterful way in an argument of fiction like this.It is inevitable to compare the so-called "freaks" of that time with the current. Today the characters presented in the film would be handicapped or diminished psychic or physical and would be in very bad taste to them a commercial claim. Today we are more sophisticated and the "freaks" of today are those that make more nonsense, either because they are as Forrest Gump or want to be it; There are (or were) public forums such as the semaphore or Martian Chronicles supposed they were covered by an intended environment of equality, to all those rare people with mental problems or desire to succeed with any outrageous. But nothing further from the truth, because they were not confessed circuses for the public mockery and derision. Even "freak" is used as a distinctive feature and with pride for those who want to distinguish themselves from the rest of mortals in customs, habits, hobbies or alleged knowledge and experiences.Perhaps, and if it were not a too easy conclusion, Mr Browning gives us to understand that many times the real monsters are not those freaks, but do normal?.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3770

Emilio Calvo de Mora

1408

muchocine

After a momentous start, it drops to a desenlance awkward, hopelessly untapped. Even so, entertains. Or my movie buff corazoncito, steeped in Christmas, ho ho ho, have been light and is porous as a Magdalene in a cafe.

Stephen King is an inexhaustible hotbed of arguments. In a sense, King makes the demanding reader of literature forgive its (often smear of rush and poorly refined) form in style and logistical resources and gives up without hesitation in the background to this formidable barque of stories that we are well accustomed. Why 1408 is Stephen King to 100%: because the film inherits the vices and the successes of the master of horror short narrative and proposed, in a format more television than film, an orgiastic and recommended income in fear, in the certainty that everything that surrounds us can conjure up against us and make us suffer the most intolerable hell.Order fantastic entertainment has been severely strained by the quality of the products it intended to recover as a genre worthy and relevant. It is not that this room 1408 is going to substantially change this evidence, but helps greening a style of doing things which made it more wisely than anything else while we not contemplábamos. More consistent to the story to what Hitchcock or an episode of midnight Twilight Zone to the feature film that can come very long tape entertains a lot, teaches his letters as soon as start and never stealing the spectator the feeling to be attending an entertaining and intriguing tour de force between a screenwriter (King) overheated imagination(, background) and reality, always plumbate, always paid to the routine and lukewarm to manipulate, alter, decompose, sometimes rot.It is not, despite what was written, an outstanding film. We even give a remarkable. Convinces the innocence of his proposal, with its precious metalwork domestic, for his indisimulado effort to open new chapter in the hypothetical Manual of Terror in the 21st century, book forcibly reviled, enfangado Hostel, Saw, and other chabacanas inquiries in the morbid and the lust of the stump and the entrails hanging from a chandelier lamp. Why 1408 produces us that Nice blushing cheeks: by not resorting to clichés and return to the classics, to the Nice - and we are talking about terror - tape that we left cheerful while we delivered.When everything could enlist in the parody, the movie takes flight and takes really seriously. The story of the writer in low hours who decides to specialize in disassemble esoteric renditions of haunted rooms, urban legends sound difficult to digest and several spells and discovers that the religion which denies has sanctuary, altar and up rigorous officiating (a measured here John Cusack) is nothing more than the history of the priest King, used when you want the writer as alter ego, as passion of his irregular but attractive hero work. Mikael Hafstrom runs without frills, without establishing a personal way and without falling into clichés that could have burdened the end result being at all times an aseptic worker, an efficient Manager of the material that has fallen between hands and is not at all negligible.Armed of good intentions, is lost in traps that angry gourmet of these rare dishes between the dreams and the Kafkaesque fantasy, seen what skill should be to get out of these three parameters something that hook and does not fall in frivolities, cursiladas or poor exercise of teen horror coated transcendence. Until the end removes any possibility of ambiguity - blessed, sometimes - and disarm us the fabulation to which we have been subjected for eighty minutes. He comes to tell that Milton has truly been in paradise and to prove it he has brought a rose.How naive we believe.How nice that is the cinema.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3479

Francisco Bellón

La Sombra del Reino

muchocine

The shadow of the Kingdom is just another patriotic film made to morale in society American, it tells a story with heroes and villains in the purest style of Hollywood.

From the first years of life of the film there have been films whose primary function was to exalt the patriotic values of the society, and this has not only given in United States. There is more to do the bulk of the film which took place in the post-war Spain and in the first years of the dictatorship. But yes it is true that the American is the case clearer made propaganda film.After the brutal attacks of 11 September, and after leaving spend time so the society cicatrizase his wounds and cure your pain, Hollywood has found a real patriotic Philo in terrorism. The shadow of the Kingdom tells the investigation following a savage attack on a residential complex for Americans in Saudi Arabia. From the beginning, the film openly shows his cards, and is not masking his patriotic speech. The script is quite simple, vulgar, devoid of all credibility and very predictable. The American agents are portrayed as if they were superheroes, who must do their work in appalling conditions, in addition to addressing the indifference or hostility of local authorities. But as it could not be less, no lack of the character of the local police who agreed with the arguments of our heroes, and to follow the tradition, from the outset well known what will be their fate. The film has two parts well differentiated, the first research type CSI, while the second is filled with well resolved action sequences, that Yes.The shadow of the Kingdom is just another patriotic film made to morale in society American, it tells a story with heroes and villains in the purest style of Hollywood. The problem is that in real life not distinguishes so clearly the good from the bad, and everything related to middle and United States is much more complex that it showing the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4244

Plissken

H6 Diario de un asesino

muchocine

That the success of the carnet is proven by points, they should move this concept to other areas, as the film. Sad, sad, that a film is thus carried out.

That the success of the carnet is proven by points, they should move this concept to other areas, as the film. As it is seen that anyone can be reached with a script or whatever under his arm, even accessing the ICAA (upon the recommendation of some buddy) aid and direct a film, what less than that perpetrated a fudge remove a few points, and not let him go two chestnuts followed. And if you do, remove it from circulation. Cinematically speaking, of course.This delusion comes to the thread of ' H6: Diary of a serial killer ', the directorial debut of the young Majorcan artist Martín Garrido Baron, who as in the web of the film indicated, "with only 9 years he began to paint, and at 17 already exhibited his first work in a gallery, which makes almost a prodigy of the image".Viva humility.'H6: Diary of a serial killer ' premiered with a Conatus of controversy to renege friend Garrido of the final assembly of the film, throwing pests of producers for not having included the 45 minutes long testimonials of doctors, guards and you go to know more about the character. From here I thank the producers in question that I avoid 45 minutes more of ordeal, because the film lasts 90 endless, dull, absurd, old and at times hilarious minutes, more than enough to get an idea of the prodigious Mr Garrido.El argument is simple: Antonio Frau (hilarious Fernando Acaso) kills his girlfriend and spent fourteen years in prison, after which he married a woman vase, inherits his aunt Encarna pension (insane scene dedicated to receive inheritance of his lawyer) and begins to do the work for which has been "elected" by a "superior being" (Florentino Pérez?): kidnap, rape, and cut prostitutes, leaving everything collected in a meticulous diary, as it did at the beginning of the 20th century his idolHenry Landrú. SPOILERS (as if someone were her to see) the first problem is the script, perpetrated by Martín Garrido, Sr. on the basis of a character that mistreats and kills her partner after just three minutes of footage, jumps to that same character, fourteen years later, become a psychopath who says himself in the voiceover, is called to be "the chosen" to purify and sacrifice some few women of dissolute life. Someone said "character development"? For what, if you've already shown that he was a murderer at age 28?Later makes it happen, again and again, by the same situation: I draw someone, I would like to eat, I kill. Invariably, all their victims go through this modus operandi. The third intimate dinner you get loose laughter.But there's more: marries it an (laughable Mª José Bausá) jamona of 35 tacos which leads years pulling a married doctor, and that by leaving the House of his parents is ready to marry this element out of the bag. The jamona also spoke in voice-over, has three scenes of bed and they do not kill. Live at the boarding house with her husband and tortured prostitutes without knowing anything, and his best phrase in the movie is:-this Board makes me bad of the nervous system.More: when it comes to film, appears a police inspector (played, so to speak, by the very same Martín Garrido, Sr.) of which knew nothing, which also speaks in "off" and discover the murderer with a ticket of the first victim of Fernando Acaso (absurd Alejo Sauras, lasts three minutes and says six phrases). The "case" resolves to the first row that make the Board, already takes criminal mind.And to end with the hyphen: the murderer, in the end, is that he had devised a plan to become a psycho-killer superstar, covered with the proceeds from the rights of his diary (halfway with his wife jamona) and get to Venezuela as soon as they soltaran you from the asylum. The one chosen was a humbug! When he spoke in "off" with himself, it was autoengañando! A twist of worthy of Bryan Singer screenplay, will. Pathetic writer and actor, this Martin Garrido, Sr.Y I have left to the end to this artist, this "prodigy of the image", Martín Conectado, Jr. kid, for my part three tips from my humble knowledge of the environment:-when you desnivelas the frame, usually get sense of confusion, imbalance, Madness (test to see 'Dogs of straw', Sam Peckinpah, for example). But when you desnivelas the framing in 75% of the levels, get sense of that were shooting with a tripod without bubble, or drunken-rhythm in a sequence does not mean to put plans for a tenth of a second in a conversation of the kind "would have worked much?" Likewise, if you will display the number of five murders, five of a total of 18 who committed the element, at least varies a bit of House, that the third bored already a little-if at the end you are going to copy to other (Lynch, Fincher, McNaughton.), or attempt to position it at least, don't go by the life of "prodigy of the image", man. All copy, but when we artistillas give penalty.Sad, sad, that a film is thus carried out.A 2, for some time in some of the prostitutes and give less would be to give him notoriety.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2376

Natalia Eseverri

Ladrones

muchocine

Thieves is undoubtedly one of the best visually better made films I've seen in my life. A good choice to be impress by Spanish films.

Thieves is undoubtedly one of the best visually better made films I've seen in my life.Each scene has a special meaning which is not discussed with words, but that airs everything what you want to say through the eyes and the gestures of the characters, and above all of his music, that explains everything what is happening to the perfection.It is a dramatic story in which Juan José Ballesta plays a young man who has managed to survive through theft from tiny well and wants to rebuild their lives, leaving the juvenile Centre. A challenge that fails to get that society still judged him by acts of its past and again found that urge to live, when he discovers a girl tries to steal a disc in a shop and help that they caught him not.From there, develops a precious relationship which goes explaining as it is the art of stealing and you really realize how easy that we neglect our things, so far that steal, then you return to put precautions unless you forget and you return to steal. Often loop.Both crossbow and María Valverde interpretations are extraordinary, seems to lie listening crossbow to speak in interviews that seems a kid, then when you see him playing so difficult characters you falls the soul to the ground and see you fact a man. And especially not you you can lose the magnetism of these two with their gaze. Simply amazing.A good choice to be impress by Spanish films.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/300

Oscar Cantero

Poseidon

muchocine

If we stay with the moments of fast-paced action, is a film that could be described as even enjoyable. If we value the whole, is not more than another pufo? transatlantic?.

You can already imagine what must be to celebrate a night of new year on Board of a luxurious ocean liner. Because these are the Poseidon passengers when a tidal wave sweeps the boat and puts it, literally, legs (or keel) up. The few who do survive, decide in principle follow the advice of the captain expected ransom, but later join Jofn Dylan, who has begun a solitary quest in pursuit of survival through the mass of iron in which the ship has been converted. Directed by Wolfgang Petersen (Troy, the perfect storm) and starring a broad cast among which are (not for artistic quality but for screen time) Josh Lucas (road to glory, an unfinished life) and Kurt Russell (Sky High, Vanilla Sky), Poseidón is one of these new versions (prefer this definition to the bombastic anglicism remake) fashionable now in Hollywood and that basically consists of take a movie of thirty years ago and then back towithout contributing anything new, and even a little distorted the original. "The Poseidon Adventure", in 1972 headed by Ronald Neame and interpreted the always excellent Gene Hackman, this version is much poorer in the development of the script and in the Assembly of characters, empty most of them and barely worked. Undeniable is that Yes, the wealth and quality of special effects, the only raison d ' être of the film.It is fair to acknowledge the intensity and spectacular nature of some scenes, accompanied by a good soundtrack which adds to the sensations that it transmit the film. If we stay with the moments of fast-paced action, Poseidón is a film which could be described as even enjoyable. That Yes, if we value the whole, is nothing more than another "transatlantic" pufo.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1601

Ramón Besonias

La ciencia del sueño

muchocine

The science of sleep has put their expectations in the presentation of animated frames that plastificaran the inner world of the character with imagination and optimism, but fails. Rather, it stuns, disconcerting and SAPs.

Long live the disruption! This proclaims that judgment the character soñambulista who plays with solvency? but the truth is that to look like alelado it should not be the very Stalislavski - Mexican Gael García Bernal, is not just a fleeting remnant that accompanies this stew of pseudoníricas images that is the science of sleep. No, it is something more, it is a statement of intent by a Michel Gondry released the excellent scripts Charlie Kaufman had attended him so far with one genius that manifest in the master forget about me! and at the bottom and deranged (but with a personal logic) Human nature. And it is that in the science of sleep everything seems disorganized, as a collage pasted randomly through a pastiche of frames mounted without criterion. Do as much who wants to Gondry, nobody ends up believing the more or less imaginative world? thing up I doubt - the duermevelas of the protagonist. Instead, the proposal to set crumble with ease, giving the feeling that one has attended a meeting of naïfs scenes (that's the word: naive), which of course not just sojourns at any port. Perhaps believed the director presenting numerous dislocated images and depicting the emotional world of the young lovers, the viewer would be hallucinating film and waving Palms in the air. Not enough, Gondry, is not enough.Indeed, it is curious that end enjoying more of the woodyalleniano character of the co-worker, a fun Alain Chabat, that of-already at the end of the agonizing film - Odyssey of the troubled Stephane. And it is that you better a goat on a ridge than clouds flying. The science of sleep has put their expectations in the presentation of animated frames that plastificaran the inner world of the character with imagination and optimism, but fails. Rather, it stuns, disconcerting and SAPs.There are moments that lifted the film, but that lasts a blowing. As I have already said, Chabat and his dialogues are gold, as they are silver first daydreams of Gael. The pelotuda and fellow couple geek is sympathetic, serving as a counterpoint to the pragmatic Chabat. Does Charlotte Gainsbourg? to eat at the scene of the party, with this mini sesentera - as if nothing happens between dream and dream of your agilipollao can partner? The rest is cardboard, papier-mâché and cotton. Who expect to return to the universe of forget me! You will feel disappointed. Nowhere near approaching him. It would be like comparing the cut and paste pre-school with a Chagal.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3821

Rafa Ferrer

Saw 4

muchocine

Lords of Lions Gate, not bludgeon his saga franchise nor his goose eggs of gold, disappointing and without contributing anything to the saga, or to the development of the same, without motivation, empty... it can tell more negative words in so little space?

As said at the time when I saw both "Saw" as "Saw 2" as the third installment "Saw 3", while the first seemed like an excellent film, who saved the ass and current accounts to a small producer as Lions Gate had thinking about launching it directly to DVD for rental and that avatars of fate decided to release in the 2004 theatrical Halloween, the rest have been shifting thanks to the good reputation (and excellent taquillaje), and while the first was an experiment that was excellent (as already mentioned), the rest have been order to its predecessor, and demonstrating that with little, you can make (or raise) far without great efforts, neither actors nor effects, leaving, I might add, to the audience with the mouth open with a final very style that likes to get mNight Shyamalan (but in shabby), and making the mouth of the teenagers who would do the rest.Sincerely did not have any type of bet towards this fourth installment, especially when I started to read and verify that criticism her put as the worst in the series, so I waited for DVD and!Voila! an evening without having nothing better to do I I started to see her; and once more my opinion joins the most, while the film delves into the aspects of the life of Jigsaw, as if of a vulgar Hannibal Lecter tell the reasons that led him to become the murderous serial killer that today they tell us their films, after explaining these reasons the film is lost in a thousand byways without sensewhich they do not serve anything, and where a "anyone can be the murderer of the Puzzle" seems the leitmotif of the same, on the other hand, traps, which in the early tapes were not only curious but rightly cruel, are transformed into mere crap, which ever is easier to RID, and left again to the viewer with very bad taste in mouth (for the time lost in viewing) and few wanting more.In terms of actors, all unknown and side of multitude of series, none are seen delivered, all lost, without providing, without expecting anything, and without showing the "bad feeling" that is supposed to move on screen, mention besides that show in some moments to Jigsaw, as a sort of avenging hero, and not as a cursed and bloody murderer.Finally, if the saga continues down this path, for my part is the last film that I see, already has happened with other deliveries in the horror film, where I parked movies and I refused in round to keep watching for new releases. Lords of Lions Gate, not bludgeon his saga franchise nor his goose eggs of gold, disappointing and without contributing anything to the saga, or to the development of the same, without motivation, empty. can one say more negative words in so little space?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/648

Alberto Concepción

El viento que agita la cebada

muchocine

The successes that defects are more numerous... Personal reflection overcomes his slow pace

To Ken Loach is called 'committed director' for his films of social character, such as 'Raining Stones'. Many are advocates, while others tend to criticize the lack of objectivity in his films, or rather, the feeling of being too notorious is his position. I cannot have an opinion too valuable because 'The wind that shakes the barley' is the first film that I see of the acclaimed English filmmaker, but I advocate that any position or vision to make a film: the film is art, and as such, must be personal. It is the diversity of all where wealth, which is why I think that filmmakers have to bring his vision, whether or not objective. That tape like less (or more) is independent. The tape shows us, with historical views that could be somewhat contentious for some, the birth of the Irish Republican Army, IRA. We are in the closed and green Ireland of 1920, in rural areas where lives the British 'invasion', where reigns the resignation and rabies. Although the reflection of the time, customs and way of life is good, highlights of the film is the confrontation between the own Irish, staged in numerous passages of the film: the reason for the origin of the conflict in their personal positions, and the absurdity of certain decisions. While 'The wind that shakes the barley' contains typical elements (tear moments perhaps something intentional or avoidable), does not deserve to be branded as well: its virtues are more numerous than the defects, among them could draw a somewhat irregular rhythm, or rather, unnecessarily slow sometimes. But far from being pretentious, the film achieves one (again) reflection in the Viewer, beyond the real plot, coming to ask if it has both changed the way of thinking of a century ago with the actual.o even with the centuries. The interpretive section at the head with the chameleonic and always correct Cillian Murphy seconded by a group of actors not too known to the general public, each fulfilling its role. The picture and the rest of the technical aspect accompany, without being an astonishing visual beauty, although not has become overshadowed by the rest of strengths of Loach. The problem of 'The wind that shakes the barley' is probably the feeling of not being entirely original, running times; but, avoiding prejudices and with some predisposition, one enjoys the film. Like it or not, objectively the result is done bueno.de, already won the Palme d'Or at the last Cannes Festival. Something will be.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4256

Ivan Villamel

Monstruoso

muchocine

An exceptional work, which reformulates the code generic and narrative, to offer us a catastrophic film with being antidiluviano of through, showing us the double readings of a society slave of new technologies.

After sweeping to victory at the American box office during its first weekend (46 million dollars in four days), the new sample of multimedia entertainment guru JJ Abrams, an absolute genius of binomial entertainment-marketing for the film and American television comes to our screens. A creator, that beyond the quality of their projects, which may like it or not (though to a server you earned from long ago), knows to build the paraphernalia and the expectation to create each new project he undertakes a sociological phenomenon. In its new proposal as a producer, which leaves the baton of leadership to his close collaborator Matt Reeves, introduces us squarely in an exciting game where the generic conventions of thinner, giving rise to a history that transcends beyond the screen to point directly to the technological obsession of our society in the 21st century.The argument, so cleverly hidden during the pre-production of the film, shows us the feast of despedidad of a young New York name Rob, since him has emerged a promising job as Vice President of a company headquartered in Japan. After showing us, camera in hand, loving squabbles between some characters at this crowded party, a mysterious tremor puts on alert all them, thinking that this is perhaps an earthquake, or even a terrorist attack. From that moment, his next few hours will be Vertigo, trying to leave with life of hell in which the island of Manhattan has become by the attack of a stranger be.As discussed above, in the Chair of director Matt Reeves, a director which only had as baggage above the direction of television episodes and some forgettable screenplay for conventional films of action ("alert maximum 2") sits. That is why it will be difficult to find out if the true architect of the final product is himself or his popular producer, moreover, after seeing some pictures of filming where it seems that the less, the film was shot two-handed. In any case, the Mise en scene of the film, contrary to what may seem due to the semi-documentary style of the story, is one of the great strengths of the film, where Reeves gets something that many tried to (and even justified) before leaving Midway, use this adrenalítico camera movement to interior of the characters and their anguish personal portrait mode. Here at Cloverfield (aka "Monstruoso"), this axiom acquires its absolute perfection, getting Reeves that confusing and dizzying scenes are directly related with that feeling of loss of characters, on the other hand, being clear and concise those which must describe attacks or flat General (not to mention master dramatic scenes in their intimacy as the reaction of Rob after the call of her concerned mother). This brilliant visual work is accompanied by a tremendously effective script, in which, by removing a couple of turns of dubious credibility as a military permit civilians head-on at your own pace through the affected area, each of the shares takes place with the narrative rhythm right, alien to any narrative debt that creates an obsession to lengthen the story (little more than their acertadísimos 80 min of footage)contributing therefore to make still more credible the agony and terrifying experience faced by our troubled protagonists.These protagonists are played by actors little popular impact the vast majority (perhaps Mikel Vogel, for her performance in the remake of "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre", the most well-known). Which does not mean, that demonstrate a solvency beyond doubt, resulting as real as life itself in its characterizations, and perfect when it comes to translate on-screen desperation or more primary emotions.On the other hand, it is impossible to deny the film effective and powerful help media possessing, thing that is perhaps the main reason for which certain American means, in a very superficial way, have been used as a weapon against this brilliant film. Creating even false indirectly related Web sites with aspects of the film, to how to create false clues, does more than increase the worth of the proposal, beyond the limited view of certain media retrograde, stagnated in the past that will never return, and which JJ Abrams knows RID to clear samples to accept the future of multimedia art with enthusiasm. Creating even false myspace places on the characters in the film (and logically, anyone can search for the network), or protective activist groups of the environment (which who knows if they will have relation to be shown in the film).Buried beneath that aspect of simple catastrophic film with Monster of through, hide multiple readings at the risk of pass unnoticed by less smart viewers. For starters, the film is the best ever shot sample on the paranoia of American society after the terrorist attacks of 9-11, penetrating by way of documentary on a metaphorical sample of reality within the fiction, not only for its visual style, but even because it must not forget that what we are seeing on the screen, is not more than the evidence of what has happened in the area formerly called Manhattanby way of visual testimony of the terrifying tragedy occurred. This fact is shown on-screen alternating personal recollections filmed in previous days by the same videotape, a tremendously effective trick to create the necessary contrast between quiet and superficially concerned life of these privileged somethings, and the stark realiadad who played them live later. This intrusion into the intimacy of this group of friends, leaves us another interesting reflection on new media that dominate our lives, where anything must be filmed to be a crushing credibility. Where "The Blair Witch Project" was looking for a notable analysis of the essence of fear as myth embedded in the popular imagination, or "REC" with respect to the power of the intrusion of the media in any area of our lives, "Cloverfield" (aka "Monstruoso") goes far beyond these two successful productions that come to mind of irretrievably (still lower than the new proposal of Abrams) (by far), resulting in one of the best fantasy films of the last five years without a doubt productions. A film whose growing tension is masterfully (unlike the two, where obvious pace gaps prevented them from even more transcend gender), with set truly anthology pieces that will go to the history of the genre, such as the attack of the residual beings of the big monster in the corridors of the metro, shot with an MBA who scares of the reached perfection (and reminds the master scene that we all remember the "aliens" of) (Cameron), or go no further, scenes of absolute macabre beauty, such as the scene of the ghostly chariot driven by a horse without fixed direction (a picture suggestive to say enough is enough). Mention apart in this respect for the scene of the rescue in that semiderruido skyscrapers and only holding in another which is still standing, a modern tower of babel which stands imposing with the intention that has always had the man reach the sky, and that on this occasion becomes death trap (with echoes of that popular film called "The Colossus in flames").In short, a work unique, at the risk of being misunderstood, he reformulates synchronizing codes and narrative, to offer us a catastrophic film with being antidiluviano of half as excuse to move double readings of a society technologies slave. Simply masterful.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3567

Rafa Ferrer

The Ten

muchocine

A surprise at the moment has no release date at Spain.

As with "Paris Je't Aime", or the more recent "Manuale De Amore" (1 and 2), now in "The Ten" We also find a film based on short stories, I like the idea of parody every commandment and post to it would have a parody quite logic, I like how the writers have broken the head in, with all the characters, weaving them together, to achieve as well as comic situations, all together in the film.It is true that some stories are made well and others seem to be more, on the other hand, is normal in this type of movies where everything as I have already said, sometimes requires more, than less.On the other hand, the cast, headed by Jessica Alba, Winona Ryder (this girl has always had these Pectoral?), Gretchen Mol, Famke Janssen, Oliver Platt and Liev Schreiber, Justin Theroux, bring this packaging the protagonists need, with special attention to the 2 musical numbers at the end, where all the protagonists appear singing as "better you know do it".A surprise at the moment has no release date at Spain.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2352

Alvaro Oliva

Hostel 2

muchocine

The atmosphere and the beauty of the locations are the most striking aspect of this so-called torture?Hostel 2?, which we hope will not be continued.

He was not eager to see the new proposal by Eli Roth, but inertia took me to see it. My previous feelings were confirmed. The film is bad, pretty bad. On the basis of a scheme similar to the previous one, instead of being directed by three guys, now are females that know what is being tortured and afraid. By means of a beautiful woman, the girls accept going to a spa in Slovakia, and of course, we know what will happen. The innovation of this sequel is that Roth shows us the side two torturers, two American rich to see for the first time in the ranks of the elite hunting.A from there, topics and more topics involved in a script, if you can call, do not understand how they did not rewrite, since it leaves much to be desired.The best: some blows black comedy, which takes place at the end of the film and who is starring these little devils in "Hostel" calling gum tourists.It is curious as to the protagonist being treated with excessive respect, not be get to see either in bikini (and that is a Spa), and instead show us many other things. There are some cameos and references in "Hostel 2" that deserve mention, such as the Elisabeth Bathory on. As for the actors, none that particularly stands out.The atmosphere and the beauty of the locations are the most striking aspect of this torture called "Hostel 2", which hopefully does not have continued.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2727

Francisco Bellón

Caótica Ana

muchocine

Caótica Ana is a film that does honor to its title, a chaotic and frenetic journey that confuses the spectator, and in which Julio Medem is not recognized anywhere.

The day that were confirmed preparations for the filming of Caótica Ana was a great day for the Spanish film. We recuperábamos to one of our largest creators, Julio Medem, plunged into a deep depression, among other reasons, by savage persecution which underwent by certain sectors of the political and public life by his documentary the Basque ball: the skin against the Piedra.El film by Julio Medem is difficult to describe, since that symbolic, poetic elements and even magicalthey have always been very present in his films. But Caótica Ana is situated one step beyond. The story tells of the life of Ana (Manuela Vellés), a young artist who arrived in Madrid to make their dreams reality. However, Ana saves power, a hidden danger in your subconscious in his peaceful life in Ibiza could suppress, but which is now coming out afloat. Julio Medem is one of the most personal authors of Spanish cinema, and to understand his works and appreciate them, have to be carried away by its history and its characters. With Caótica Ana does not pass the same, even though the Viewer do your part, is impossible to connect with the characters or less with the journey of protagonist, Ana and its chaos. As it is advancing the film, the trip becomes a frantic free fall that drags the audience to unexpected places, in which nothing makes sense. The tape is full of symbols and metaphors, but on this occasion rizan curl in such a way that nobody is able to accept them or let alone understand them. The entire film is narrated through a countdown, which makes the public feel as if it was the protagonist of a bad dream that wants to wake up as soon as possible. Never recognizes the style by Julio Medem, a dark and suffocating, atmosphere with some really unpleasant and unbecoming of the San Sebastian film sequences. What do abound are the nod to earlier, like sex and Lucia, or directors as John Ford. For its part, Manuela Vellés performs a very natural work, although he cannot hide his clear lack of interpretative skills.Caótica Ana is a film that does honor to its title, a chaotic and frenetic journey that confuses the spectator, and in which Julio Medem is not recognized anywhere. It's a very intimate and personal travel for the director, certainly very necessary, and which we hope exit strengthened to cope with their upcoming projects.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2702

Rafa Ferrer

¿Por qué se frotan las patitas?

muchocine

Funny musical, and that we always complain about the "capacaidismo" of the Spanish film, we will give a small (and also concise) vote of confidence to this tape.

When I was in the "The young Jane Austen" press pass I found in the film that this film (directed by Álvaro Begines, vocalist of the mythical "not tread on me that I have flip flops", and that it reserves a small cameo) I went back to re-release, something curious and little given in Spain, come on, I do not know any tape (if someone knows what you tell me now or street forever) which has rereleased after the success at the box office.A musical comedy, "The other side of the bed" which starred, among others a great Lola Herrera (and I do that this woman had "parked and kind" as a TV actress), Raúl Arévalo (a discovery in "dark blue almost black"), Antonio Dechent, and Carlos Alvarez-Novoa.No I can say that I liked, that has not disappointed me, but if it is true that, as you can read in your poster, with lyrics by Eva Hache (have sought people from film and television to put opinions, rather than always critics), leaves you with a smile from ear to ear, and look, now that I'm going through a time a little "plof" does not hurt a film that smart you face and you get a bit of laughter to the front.On the musical side, of course, as I have already said, we are facing that, a musical comedy, highlights from "aserejé", to songs of Camilo sixth or Andrés Calamaro, as well as the relieved "I am rebel" that same applies for a broken for a tattered.Honestly, it is a curious thing, and that we always complain about the "capacaidismo" of the Spanish film, we will give you a small (and also concise) vote of confidence to this tape, incidentally, helped me to discover the Aslandticos, singing the main theme of the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2154

Patri

Adaptation (El ladron de orquideas)

muchocine

In the movie itself we are witnessing the process of creation of the same script, a script impressively well tied and built in a very intelligent way.

Adaptation is directed by Spike Jonze, but the true star of this film is the screenwriter, something unusual, but it's not any screenwriter, is Charlie Kaufman, screenwriter known for movies and forget about me, as being John Malkovich or Human Nature, all of them uniquely original.Kaufman commissioned to do an adaptation of the book "The thief of orchids", and from there begins the film, we see all the difficulties that happens to make that script, until he decides to seek help from his brother, and included himself and the aforementioned brother in the script, then, will we see narrating the beginning of the filmwhich has been the beginning of the film that we're seeing, so we see him write the screenplay for the film that we are watching and is a real crazy! Therein lies the genius of this film.This is much more than cinema within cinema, is a stunning twist back, impressed by the ability to tell different stories: the Kaufman and his brother writing the script, of the writer Susan Orlean writing the book and that of John Laroche is the writer in his book account, could have been an authentic gibberish, but get that the Viewer is not lost.Nicholas Cage makes its best performance since Leaving Las Vegas, portraying Charlie Kaufman and Donald Kaufman, his brother, are two opposing characters, and it must not be easy to interpret two very different characters in the same film, pity that Cage be devoted to do anything interesting films such as the phantom rider, or other easily notable action films.Meryl Streep always is fantastic, and here is not less, portraying the writer Susan Orlean, whose character takes a turn along with the story, going from being a writer in love with the flowers, to be an adulteress, killer and drug addict! It seems that the author seemed very original as they had adapted his book and it did not bother her at all to submit it in this way because all of this did not happen in reality.Chris Cooper, who took an Oscar for this performance, is also another pretty good actor and often choose films in which works very well, in American Beauty was really impressive, here plays the Orchid thief who gives title to the book, a character in my opinion very interesting and that is much better understood when explained certain aspects of its past.A true privilege is put us in mind of Charlie Kaufman and attend his ramblings and thoughts when confronted with a script. And what about the script? In the movie itself we are witnessing the process of creation of the same script, a script impressively well tied and built in a very intelligent way.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/65

Jose Contreras

Los tres entierros de Melquiades Estrada

muchocine

The only thing it lacks, to be more intense, is that we knew better to Snagglepuss

The first film that directed Tommy Lee Jones is guaranteed by a script by Guillermo Arriaga. This is something we should support rather than celebrate. A screenwriter who has written the script of "loves dogs" and "21 grams" can not tell a story without adding tricks to demonstrate how knows. I recommend that they withstand the principle with the monerías of temporal disorder because then enters into flour.Tommy Lee Jones plays Pete, an American who befriends a back wet without papers called Melquiades Estrada. It is the dead of the first scene. Pete find out who killed him, plot a revenge and kidnaps him. The Viewer does not know that he wants to do with Melquiades killer and murderer nor.Most striking of this story is that the protagonist has the qualities of the bad guys in all films: has a fixed idea. While the bad happens what happens to good: has the possibility to change and learn an important lesson. This round of nut to the topics makes a special film. A film worthy of see.The only thing that is missing to be more intense, is that we knew better to MILTIADES, which cogiéramos you we just love that it takes Tommy Lee Jones. But there was no time. With so much time juggling, the writer had no time to do their job.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1168

Jeremy Fox

Banderas de nuestros padres

muchocine

A great film that does but note that Eastwood is at its best as director.

Already disregarded a priori, due to its title, by many to be not taken the trouble to see it or find out, it has come to our country "Flags of our fathers" Clint Eastwood.Como as it is known, is the first part of a diptych, complete with "Letters from Iwo Jima" and aims to tell the story of the battle of Iwo Jima from American and Japanese point of view.In fact, the battle and everything that surrounds to the placement of the protagonist of the famous photo of Joe Ronsenthal flag are not, you would expect coming from Eastwood, but a pretext to tell us otherwise.Tells us the screenplay by William Broyles, Jr. and Paul Haggis, based on the book by James Bradley and Ron Powers, is a story about how Governments built false heroes and how you use them for their own purposes. And as such, could not be clearer: the Governments care them a pepper people or even much less the truth.But it is also a story about another kind of heroism: that of loyalty to your peers that you can do to give your life for them, not for your country. Showing the other side of the coin, the human side, Eastwood composed an ode to the fellowship.Recurrre so, moving voluntarily and clearly model "Saving private Ryan" with which some her compare mistakenly, to nothing confusing time jumps that allow us not tire us never, nor of the United States or of the field of battle scenes. Thanks to this structure, the film starts quickly, which would have been impossible had they been told in a linear fashion.Because, I repeat, the war is not more than an excuse for what Eastwood we want to count. "Flags of our fathers" much closer is thematically "The man who shot Liberty Valance" that of "Saving private Ryan". In fact, references to John Ford (director of the aforementioned masterpiece) come to be evident in a scene with a rocking chair, metaphor fordiana of family unity, in the foreground for a few seconds. Needless to say, that the direction of Eastwood is so elegant as always.Posts to seek the tickling to the film we can argue that, while all stakeholders met to perfection, there is no any wonderful performance that stands out above the others. But the truth is that there are two explanations to this: the first is that we are in a choral film where would not have much sense that some highlight on others and the second is that I had the misfortune to see the dubbed film (if we are that fold better in the world I don't want to imagine how will be the worst).The way of introducing the character of James Bradley, son of John "doc" Bradley (Ryan Phillippe), protagonist of a scene is also a bit strange a tad forced that it seems to be there with the purpose of making us cry (and indeed did with me).But leaving aside these small defectillos, it's a great film that does but note that Eastwood is at its best as director.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/272

Jose Contreras

Cars

muchocine

Create an imaginary able to challenge this desire of glory the sense has more value than it seems.

Despite funny are the stories of Pixar, its protagonists always pose serious problems that can be stated as something like "what place I take I in the world?". "Toy Story 2" posed if Buddy wanted to be a toy or object of exhibition, the "Bugs" comicos had to decide if they were going to be clowns or heroes in "Buscando a Nemo" Nemo has to choose between a tank and an ocean, in "The Incredibles", Mr Parr has to decide between being an insurance agent or a superhero. Lightning McQueen, the protagonist of Cars, has to choose between the selfish life of triumph, and friendship.Lightning McQueen seems above all to the Buddy of "Toy Story 2". In a world like ours so mindlessly obsessed with fast television fame is an act of courage to defend the anonymous life of townspeople. To Mr incredible asked his wife why she wanted to do things by him. What sense does the lone hero? In a Pixar film the hero is always the friendship.McQueen is poised to Los Angeles to win the piston Cup that will make you famous when he/she loses at the legendary Route 66 and then forgotten radiator Springs Village. Forced by the Court to perform social tasks by an infringement, McQueen will meet a group of neighbors that has nothing to do with his own world. Sally Carrera, the girl, Luigi and Guido, two Italian cars who admire only the Ferrari, Mate, the horny of the place, which has fun scaring, tractors, and the mysterious Doc Hudson. Each character has something that makes them endearing and something that ties it to the lost people. McQueen will be descubriendolo little by little. Does radiator Spring something for him? Is there anything more important than fame? Many criticise American cinema his obsession for the triumph. Therefore, create an imaginary able to challenge this desire of glory the sense of a film has more value than it seems.The new invention of Pixar is valid by all the human background and dazzling for all the expressive vehicle which has been used to transmit it: nostalgia for the 1950s, double readings, coche-persona, tractor-vaca, marks, progress, the objectification of the competitions, the recreation of a world made for cars.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/138

Pablo

Hostel

muchocine

Film gore correct policticamente disappointed by a little attractive and fairly simple plot

Wrapped under the mantle of Tarantino Presents comes to us a tape of the director of Cabin Fever which seeks to transport us to the dirtiest human instincts via a very well filmed horror film but with a fairly weak script. "We are facing the second film as Eli Roth director, inspired by real events that a coversación surguierón with his friend Harry Knowles (webmaster of Aintitcoolnews.com)."We were talking about the more sickly things that could be found on the Internet. Something that was beyond the already usual fatal accident skateboard or about those two girls Japanese vomiting each at the mouth of the other in a bathtub when Harry I spend a link to a website where for only $10,000, in Thailand, anyone who were willing you could join a room"give him a loaded pistol and provide another human being to kill him".Roth had the revelation of creating a film in which three students begin to make backpack tourism until that without realizing account are victims of a murky business which consists of torturing to death a human being for a substantial amount of money.After being a day talking with his friend Quentin Tarantino, Eli finished telling him the new approach of his film. Tarantino reportedly "went crazy". "Quentin is an animated person, and never had seen him so excited for something." Do you said something as well as:? damn! You have to write that script! It is the most fucking terrifying idea I have heard in a long time for a film of fear! "Leave aside everything with what you are now, and start to write that script but already."Inspired by the enthusiasm of Tarantino, Roth disconnected the phone, shut down the mail, locked herself in the Office and began frantically writing. "He called Quentin every two or three days, when I atascaba at some point in history, and he understandably reassured me and told me that he was going in the right direction or helped me move forward," remember Roth. "It was amazing to have someone like him as a sounding board". I found myself writing twenty pages daily. "He could not stop."Finally we can say that Eli to created a film gore correct policticamente in which the marketing and distribution of this create in the viewer a few spirits who are disappointed with a little attractive and fairly simple plot. The first half-hour reminds the American Pie films, the Femina emerging are only saved from this first part which are a real treat for the eyes. The torture scenes are very small and barely spent all its potential, also most of the scenes that announce the official posters do not go into the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1338

Plissken

Miguel y William

muchocine

The blunder of the indent of Inés Paris is put the focus on Leonor, the true protagonist, and forget for too many minutes the two authors, engaged side comedians of a hors d'oeuvres pulling to vulgar comparsas.

Miguel de Cervantes, born in 1564, died in 1616. William Shakespeare, born in 1547, died in 1616. 'Miguel and William', Spanish production that starts in London in the year of Grace's. 1500?Anyway, maybe I'm wrong. Or maybe Agnes Paris, its Director and writer, we want to make it clear in advance that the proposal is to play to apparent anachronism, as it already did with the same character in ' Shakespeare in love'. What matters is that the starting point is interesting: Will Shakespeare travels to Castile in pursuit of his love interest Leonor, betrothed to the powerful Duke of Obando. There he will fight please its nothing less than with Miguel de Cervantes, in a journey that will serve to give both the best of themselves as writers.And taking into account that the film struggles, and much, to stand out from the seedy tone of the Spanish comedy in recent years, one would expect a duel of wits between these two central characters with the excuse of the Lady in question. But the blunder of the indent of Inés Paris is put the focus on Leonor, the true protagonist, and forget for too many minutes the two authors, engaged side comedians of a hors d'oeuvres pulling to vulgar comparsas.Thus, what started as a fun attempt to anachronistic comedy with modern characters in an ancient world, has just developed as 'Celeste is not a color', more or less. Leonor (squishy and very llorona Elena Anaya) is independent women and owner of their destination, but which protects tooth and nail his virginity (?); Shakespeare (tiresome Will Kemp) is a guiri buffoon who just wants to write comedies, and devotes his time to declare lover of Leonor and, meanwhile, to throw the yew trees to medium female cast. Miguel de Cervantes (Juan Luis Galiardo shutdown) is a tax-collector married and disenchanted with the writing that falls in love with Eleanor to the hear verses that he believes it. The Duke de Obando (guiñolesco José María Pou) is jealous and nasty, promised that welcomes in his castle to the two suitors of Eleanor (?). Others, because of filling: Malena Alterio makes his Bethlehem of 'Here no hay quien viva' take a leap of 400 years in time and like the Cinderella sister; Geraldine Chaplin, buf, how bad will be the thing to do what it does here; the only one that deserves special mention is Miriam Giovanelli, the girl of the unforgettable short 'already not walking' of Luiso Berdejo, and he wins here to others by a landslide, with a role more absurd, just base presence on screen. The best of the film, no doubt.Then there is the alleged strong point of the film, literary references. Some are subtle and work within the narrative. Others are stuck to shoehorn for whatever you have read 'Don Quixote', 'Othello', 'much ado about nothing' or 'Richard III' to recognize and say "ja - ja, I know where it comes that", without bothering to integrate them into the plot. In my opinion, is the another weak point of the film, not to exploit this resource to fund.Finally, as much claim to sophisticated comedy and there are so many details of brush in a film of Ozores (two pisados zurullos, a fart, two lovers retozando and a third woman under the same bed, a dwarf, an aunt bathing). The difference is that Ozores with absolute conviction, and Agnes Paris makes it because if not it does not boot the smile of the staff.In the technical section, correct setting (although noticeable limitations, especially in the boot in London and the horrendous pictures of time), photography pulling normalita and topical music (flamenquito/medieval mix).We still do not give signs of intelligence above the average in the patriotic comedy. To see if 'Cinema days' (the film, not the vehicle for showcasing of Antonio Gasset) got up the flight. A 4.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1959

Daniel Galindo

Pudor

muchocine

Without kind wink and with great courage, the brothers Tristan and David Ulloa made their debut in the direction with an interesting intimate look at the tumultuous relationship between castaways of the same family.

With honesty and modesty come into the stronghold of emotional decay and bad odor. Forgive me this play on words with meanings of the term that gives title to the tape, but is that it summarizes rightly the expedition carried out these debutantes? if forget the short cycle - the territory of intimate and individual.They say that actors that are passed to the address have a special optics, a different way of tackling a project. Although many risk with an own story (Laura Mañá and sex) by compassion; Federico Luppi and steps; Carlos Iglesias and Un Franco, 14 pesetas) others are supported by outside texts that endorse. It is the case of Tristán Ulloa that taps into the novel by Santiago Roncangliolo and the technical expertise of his brother David to lift the variegated and claustrophobic microuniverso of Pudor.La camera becomes our peephole to pry on the Habitat of some lost beings naked before our eyes. In the transition from paper to screen not fleeing of the drama, but also fall into the tedium of those who rejoice in the misfortunes of others, digging into wounds. Do (common) sense and sensibility (Special), in a way nothing subtle but not bleeding too much, giving glimpses of hope.Between the clouds sneaks some ray of sunshine along with simile, we open the umbrella and we took refuge under the shower of movies on the family, that object of research which have experienced so many filmmakers: Ettore Scola (family), Sam Mendes (American beauty), Ang Lee (the ice storm). They seem to inspire the Ulloa brothers to get a side of voyeur combined with a performance supported on the pillars of the suspense and lightweight surrealism separating them from the more typical costumbrismo.As the naturalist who observes the beasts, we are approaching a wounded family on which flutter vultures waiting for one fail. Elvira Mínguez, Nancho Novo and the young Natalia Rodriguez are backed by a well-chosen cast: Celso Bugallo, Joaquin Climent and Nuria González. And turning to the pair of responsible, one runs while the other performs, why is as well the direction of actors not found errors in photography, music and the Assembly. In other words, the perfect tandem that we hope more movies.We reserve a final point and they are devoted to the stage: Gijón. It's a necessary flight of the foci of shooting usual, Madrid and Barcelona. Beings who, despite living together, are alone and are airtight roam its streets. Fable or reality?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3106

Iñaki Bilbao

Padre nuestro

muchocine

Very hard drama, something conventional technique, but with great force. It is not that he regarded as an excellent film, but has much strength and hypnotic results in some moments.

Very hard drama that has as a starting point the history already seen in "Ecstasy", Mariano Barroso and Federico Luppi and Javier Bardem, although Zalla not done on purpose, surely even he has not seen the Spanish movie.In this new occasion, Zalla takes other paths much more dramatic to narrate a story of uprooting, search for the own identity, where the lies and misunderstandings are currency.Perhaps conventional film in the form of roll, but atypical by its harshness, harsh and detachment to the will of the Viewer, which sees astonished how destroy the lives of the aching characters, and without that can do anything help them.A few truthful interpretations, achieved climax of the streets of New York's disadvantaged neighborhoods (Brooklyn specifically), and nothing complacent argument, they make "Our father", a very worthy and honest film that already at the last Sundance international film festival won the Jurado.Explosivo Grand Prix Assembly and a frenetic pace for a sad and desolate history where the best and worst feelings of humankind are present in continuous conflict.It is not that he regarded as an excellent film, but has much strength and hypnotic results in some moments. Exquisite photography.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3962

Monica Jordán

Expiación: Más Alla de la Pasión

muchocine

Atonement is an interesting film that removes the sensitivity but above all leads to reflection on the art and a form of storytelling that is already exhausted. Expiatory Metaliteratura.

In recent years many directors have submitted a critical and/or hesitant view on the capacity of the cinema as a means of showing the reality/truth through his films. This debate, which is more characteristic of the documentary film, has reached the fiction at a historic moment in which double truths of the Governments policy is confused with the tricks and mounts the media, a situation that has achieved many filmmakers to exercise a reflection on the medium of cinema as a lawful system or no expression of reality and evidence with the theme of Iraq. But let us be clear: No, the film does not show reality, or even when he tries. Entire film, whether or not documentary, carries intrinsic manipulation that begins with the selection of the Mise en scène and continues with the delimitation of the framing. Accepted the impossibility of the concept of Objectivism in the film, it is worth being aware of the immense power of manipulations (not pejoratively understood but as selection and construction of a film) on the public. Not in vain, Eisenstein spent his career making films for political campaign purposes or Hollywood, before the growth of European presence in their ranks, decided to carry out the famous witch hunt to annihilate any subliminal messages unpatriotic (or declassified) in his scripts. On this basis and looking for reflection, appeared this year in billboard films as Zodiac, David Fincher posed by the impossibility of finding the truth in his speech, or movie before us, Atonement, posed with a goal-literary exercise something similar but of a lighter and less honest way.Speaking of Atonement could talk about clean of its staging, correctness of their performances (including Saoirse Ronan above all the adult cast), of what is striking in its work of sound (possibly the most interesting at the formal level of the entire film) or do Don? Wright to become blockbusters English novels. But the really interesting thing about Atonement is its reflection (somewhat late in the footage perhaps) about two of the functions of art (literary or film): How can capture and manipulate reality; and how through it the author can find himself.During the film, structured into three parts, it introduces us to Briony, a teenager with much imagination after finding his sister in an embarrassing position, entering a world of lies in which all suffer the consequences. This first part in which the photographic and scenic ghost of pride and prejudice flies over the work of Wright, is where sits us the lie as a strategic level to understand the rest of the film. From then on, all represent truths which deshilan one to one as a result of the child lie of the young. So we enter a more gloomy sequel in which war and the concept of the real take prominence through an incredible plane on the beach in which Wright seems to echo Bazin and his theory of the plane realistic sequence. So forget all lie to enter the world of the raw, real and pessimistic that will leave you already in the third part in which a new twist of reality makes us want to revisit all seen until then.Atonement proposes the viewer a decision-making responsibility about what what is exposed (be it literature, movies or news) and at the same time taking art as a means of atonement for the author. This second function of art which complete the meta-literary power of this work, but now it has presented to us in his images version, containing everything is that strength of the original paper.Even so, if something noteworthy about Joe Wright is his excellent literary taste and his accurate mise en scene, something that serves to continue living the film with more than decent results. Atonement is an interesting film that removes the sensitivity (at the end and the place is a story of love that is interrupted by an injustice) but above all leads to reflection on the art and a form of storytelling that is already exhausted. Because I am sorry to say, for all those who want to see a romantic story to use, that Atonement comes to an end for those who leave you ice cream by its sobriety, his sincerity and his little film magic. Already played that film put the batteries (albeit adapting novels) and started to show some skepticism about all those romantic stories with which flooded us the screens.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/402

Oscar Cantero

Corrupción en Miami

muchocine

Spectacular chases, shootings, some sensuality and a (slight) pinch of script are the ingredients with them intend to sell us the return of these sleepless and anachronistic police.

In the early 1980s were few who resisted this pair of dubious taste in clothes police that interpreted Don Johnson and Philip Michael Thomas. It was enough to look out the window in desktop schedule to hear the tune of Miami Vice in the nearby houses. Its original approach, coupled with that then only existed two television channels, motivated their audiences were millions in our country. More than twenty years later, Michael Mann, creator of the series, moved to the big screen to your detective James "Sonny" Crocket and Ricardo Tubbs, represented this time by Colin Farell and Jaime Foxx. The action begins when these two "garments" learn that several people have been killed by a blow from the high areas. In an effort to clarify the matter, will be involved in truss complexes of international drug traffickers, which will lead to a huge risk that the protagonists will take with the stoicism of the fictional characters. Spectacular chases, shootings, some sensuality and a (slight) pinch of script are the ingredients with them intend to sell us the return of these sleepless and anachronistic police. I know that we are in an era in which the scarcity of original ideas encourages the American film industry to transform old series into films, case also of Charlie's Angels or the Avengers, but I think that Don Johnson and his partner are still deeply rooted in the memory of most, and that this can make us feel certain disenchantment with new performers. That Yes, makes grace find the Spaniard Luis Tosar portraying a Hispanic offenders of the American suburbs. Mediocre.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3139

Ana Belén Pacheco

Shootem up

muchocine

The tape said it is the vehicle for the personal showcasing for walk and Clive Owen is the only player with enough straight face eating carrots and continue hitting shots even in full sexual intercourse and not seem ridiculous.

You know that feeling in the stomach boa when sales of the film? That gives you want to take a bazoca and kill half the world? The euphoria when you finished to see for the first time Matrix? The extreme satisfaction after 300? More or less is the impression which reveals Shoot'em Up!. After hour and peak that only you see shots and deaths of fancy shapes and impossible choreographies you realize that although the pieces do not jibe at all you do not mind that you've released so much adrenaline as if you had struggled to win back Troy. That's why you takes a while to realize that there is no script. I do not mean that it is bad, if not non-existent. At least a dozen pages can complete the lines uttered on screen (and if we remove the blocks and curses are in no more than five). And then you realize that it is normal because the argument is childish and Basic. Mr. Smith suffering from perpetual anger meddles in alien Crossfire to save a pregnant woman. Just "inheriting" the baby and pursued by thugs without knowing the reason. The funny thing is that I think that any viewer cares the reason for persecution and violence towards the child while they continue dying in the screen average of thirty men at least for shooting. On his way the "eventual nanny" and bad very bad. The characters are nothing more than archetypes exaggerated and therefore its simplicity makes them understandable and bright without the need to get you into their motivations. The tape said it is the vehicle for the personal showcasing for walk and Clive Owen is the only player with enough straight face eating carrots and continue hitting shots even in full sexual intercourse and not seem ridiculous. I can't imagine another actor seriously rictus and British accent doing what makes Clive. On the side of the bad Paul Giamatti that is labeled as a great actor though at the moment I regard effective and reliable: If you need to make laugh get you and if it has to be bad seems it. And as not the note "sexual" (non sensual) in the hands of the universal Italian: Monica Bellucci. It only takes 86 minutes so it is impossible that it becomes long because there are no breaks between a scene of action and the next, very much in the style of John Woo.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/754

Francisco Bellón

Los fantasmas de Goya

muchocine

The film isn't at the height. The screenplay by Milos Forman and Jean-Claude Carrière is quite weak and bland, unfortunately scratching into vulgarity.

The year 2006 will be remembered in Spanish film, above anything else, as the year of the great historical productions. On the big screen have been portrayed the century 15th, 16th, 17TH, 18th and 19th, the rise and decline of the largest empire in history, and the final sunset of another of the great empires has been humanity. Returning to the film field, this year also has been shown Spanish cinema can seduce a Director such as Milos Forman (one of the few filmmakers alive with two Academy Award for the best direction) and a star of worldwide as Natalie Portman.Los ghosts of Goya us dips at times turbulent and turbulent, while in Europe the new ideas and thoughts opened step at any price and under the protection of armsin Spain there was the ancien régime and the Inquisition still retained the old ideologies, frightening the people. Inés (Natalie Portman) is the daughter of a wealthy merchant, who poses as a model for Francisco de Goya (Stellan Skarsagard). Due to the fanaticism of the Inquisition, Agnes is arrested and falsely accused of heresy. Brother Lorenzo (Javier Bardem), Member of the Inquisicón, which he paints Goya, tries to intercede in favour of Agnes, falling for her. With so many expectations as it has generated Goya's ghosts, fulfil them all would be an effort really Titanic, and in honor of the truth, it must be said that the film is not the height. The screenplay by Milos Forman and Jean-Claude Carrière is quite weak and bland, unfortunately scratching into vulgarity. All the strength that could boast the film, taking into account such as Milos Forman as a filmmaker and the greatness of the figure to portray, is conspicuous by its absence.Despite failed plot, Goya's ghosts is a brilliant technical Bill that stand out especially Javier Aguirresarobe photography and the artistic direction of Edward Hidalgo. Above all, stand out interpretations of a superlative Javier Bardem, a solid and convincing Stellan Skarsgard, and one suffered and human Natalie Portman, capable of transmitting all the suffering of his character in Goya's ghosts. Although comparisons are odious, it is also inevitable that you come one to head this superb work by Carlos Saura (especially in the visual aspect) is Goya in Bordeaux. Goya's ghosts is a film that visually is a delight for the public, but which it fails the primary livelihood of any cinematographic work: a good story behind it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/253

Cp

El señor de la guerra

muchocine

Much criticism of American cinema, but while movies here are stupid there have movies like this

Is who the villain of the piece? Or maybe that you've still not seen. Then, do not do case of film critics that you talk about the pace of the action of the characters, and other topics, which as it is not a minority Iranian movie, was not lowering to extol. They are actors in Hollywood, famous, handsome and sold many tickets. But who have had the courage to accept a script against your own country (so clearly, the film attacks hard to the USA and its Government) without being a Michael Moore film, that if cool, this cool, and European critics applaud, when it isn't more than canned demagoguery, but changing the political sign, although it is still cheap and stylish short made in demagogy it uses. A film, almost documentary, where the excuse of the life of an arms dealer, is the hook to catch us and continue listening to a real summary of atrocities and absurdities that have crossed our planet these thirty years, while we did you case, something which incidentally, also tells us the film. It may not be a wonder, and not stop 30 minutes to explain to us in detail by that character trauma child hates the Strawberry ice cream, but for that you already have those movies that you recommend your film critic. Here are going to a class of history and politics, when your thought that you were going to watch a movie.A detail. In all written and filmed trash that surrounds us, the phrase: based on a true story, appears at the beginning, to achieve an effect on the Viewer. In this case, it comes at the end. Your thought that this were exaggerations of a few writers. No, boy, welcome to the real world, and without red pill.Much criticism of American cinema, but while here are movies stupid to launder money, on the other side of the Ocean have movies like Syriana or Lord of war, which may not be artistic wonders, but they tell us stories about how is our world, without giving us a moral judgment, without telling us who is the villain, just show us the reality, so that each one can decide it, provided that it does not need a mental nurse, this clear, that if not, better resort to Moore or Bush, depending on your creed politician. who is the villain of the piece? If you've not seen it, think that the protagonist, or the evil African dictator, and better not stop reading until you see her. If you have seen, maybe you think the same, or maybe you're agree with me. The villain is the woman from the dealer. One that does not question, does not look, does not challenge, to live in a Fifth Avenue penthouse with a high gear life, etc, etc. But that is it outraged when they put him in front of their noses, and she gets naked, refusing to put their garments paid for by the blood, but that even with all the evidence front, you do not report the traffic of weapons, but it is followed by the security forces, and leaves her husband when this is imprisoned, not before. That character, are almost all in our society.As for the film. Best thing is the thoughts of Yuri Orlov, the arms dealer, played by Nicholas Cage, who accompany us and guide us, or its dialogues with the character of Ethan Hawke, the policeman who chases him, a whole class of real policy. But also the moments of black, very black, almost sadistic humor, that appear during the film. Publicized as almost a comedy, when a black girl, in the middle of the night of Liberia asked Orlov if his amputated arm will return to grow, or many other scenes well, confused who expected a Rambo movie (also mentioned, XD) I do not think that they laugh much.In short: Better to understand our world, unless you like reading, then you have a lot of books that tell you what is happening in the world, and those who drink this film (for example, diamonds bloody Greg Campbell, to name one). Nevertheless, a quick and entertaining way to learn above all this.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/146

Alvaro Oliva

Azuloscurocasinegro

muchocine

This is one of those movies that make people who hates? Spanish film will have to be shut up

Last week I could see dark blue almost black, and the truth is that I saw twice by different circumstances. The first of these was last Tuesday of April 11, which I as anyone, went through box office and when I was doing some shopping, I saw a missed call. Upon entering the room, the cinema manager told me that I had called, which is next Friday was going to come Daniel Sánchez Arévalo to present the film with its subsequent Symposium, and so soon. Then on Tuesday I saw for the first time and I loved it. Later I will put my criticism.On Friday I went to go I loved again, Daniel came to present it later disappearing back to appear halfway through film and sit in a row. I was very curious because I had read the post or news (as want you to call) that he had written on his page, detailed as the other day I had gotten at a meeting of a neighborhood cinema to return to view and observe the spectators. Do so that there I was, watching the observer than as well says, - I am that goes to the movies with popcorn and coke? that of course he accompanied viewing.Subsequently held a symposium in which Daniel commented on various aspects of his film and on the current film scene. It is funny and at the same time "sad" that programmes such as Buenafuente and others, lacking this director and some of their players to talk about the film by the fact of not being "famous". Because as stressed the Sánchez Arévalo, the public of these programs is quite akin to that has dark blue almost black, which is why there is a range of almost two million viewers which could be interested and come to see the film, but of course, do not appear in these programs so that opportunity is lost.Well then I'll put the criticism, but first of all, and although I have nothing to do, thank Daniel that he spearheaded to Santander for submission. There are many people who know the figure of Daniel Sánchez Arévalo, but before this opera prima already we had encandilado with other small jewels: his shorts. Dark blue almost black takes the characters of physics II, although by no means forgotten situations and aspects that made him grow as a director, so it includes parts of the world he created in his previous works: Express, Gol, prophylaxis and the guilt of the Mountaineer.This is one of those movies that make people who "hates" Spanish film will have to be shut, or at least you can say that you don't like but not typical that is shit, because this opera prima is nearly masterful.Daniel as a good writer that is, has been able to dosage and make that dark blue almost black us encandile and make us laugh and cry with a few characters human and very close. Characters that we can find in any city or even our closest circles. Urban stories that give the possibility to prove that film there more than explosions and assaults, and allowing the actors enjoy with characters that are going to grow and explore several records.From a sensational Quim Gutiérrez through Marta Etura, Raúl Arévalo, Manuel Morón, Antonio de la Torre, Ana Wagener to Héctor Colomé. No doubt a spectacular cast, that although a lot of people it seems unknown, now start you to be familiar.There are many people who say if a movie is good or bad according to what have found them, in part is logical, but also have that appreciation must be meet and pay attention to many other aspects that form the product just to see.Based on all this, dark blue almost black, is confirmed as a good film, although I dare qualified excellent (one of the best of the year, and that we are in April) that the people vibrates with the film, do not believe that no one be indifferent and who isn't immersed with the characters and their experiences there is. In addition to that, already at a technical level, the direction of the "Rookie" Arévalo is very sensible. Planning, use of the camera, their limited movements, of escuadres them you, the music, the art direction, casting, ultimately to everything that must be borne in mind that the House does not fall, is taken afloat and in what way. The truth is that if with his next movie call or raise the level achieved with this, we have a director that can give much to the Spanish film and the seventh art in general.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1999

JLO

La Piscina

muchocine

Slow, slowly but without potholes as almost all of the French film, a thriller intelligent without excluding the public, with a hook in the form of final twist.

Francois Ozon French has everything to become a controversial director: ignored by critics of his country (unclassifiable according to them), a voluble and uneven work until almost marginal, and if was bit, avowed homosexual. What is the true Ozon? Do of the interesting Sitcom, Regarde la mer or the empty 8 women?.The pool is on the other hand, all virtues. It is an amalgam that mixes the best of its director. Slow, slowly but without potholes as almost all of the French film, a thriller intelligent without getting to exclude the public, with a hook in the form of final twist - dreams - not annoying and only makes reaffirm all narrated, where other directors fail miserably.Holidays of a writer (saturated, prudish and amoral as it is Sarah) and their holiday at a weekend home, are the pretext for confrontation with Julie, the daughter of his publisher (spirited, also amoral and unprejudiced) and the meeting of things lost in your life - or never found - as the desire, freedom and sex.Excellent all stakeholders, mainly the female roles: the great Charlotte Rampling (old Filmography of the director known) with a beautiful naked included to its more than sixty years. Las palmas them takes the provocative Ludivine Sagnier, who guides the story with their audacity and beauty. We'll see if its next move, Ozon reveals your true being.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4344

Oscar Martínez

Sweeney Todd

muchocine

A work of worship although somewhat slow in their execution, which lies directly along The Rocky Horror Picture Show' and 'The Phantom of the paradise' on bizarre musical refers.

Directed by Tim Burton and starring Johnny Depp, Helena Bonham Carter, Alan Rickman and Sacha Baron Cohen, Timothy Spall, among others, Sweeney Todd: the evil Barber of Fleet Street has won two Golden Globes, opting instead to three statuettes, a musical based on the work of Stephen Sondheim and Hugh Wheeler.Sweeney Todd tells the story of Benjamin BarkerHe is imprisoned because of a false accusation of Judge Turpin, only proposed staying with his wife and daughter. The return of unfair captivity, Barker returns looking for his family, but discovers that his wife committed suicide after that Turpin would like to take advantage of it and maintained captive his daughter. Then, Benjamin Barker changed his name to Sweeney Todd, returns to his old barbershop and begins plotting his revenge. To do so, it complotará with Mrs. Lovett, the lonely owner of the premises located below the barbershop. In the bloody revenge, she will find a way to revive his meat pastries business.That Tim Burton is a single director and which, therefore, drag a number of unconditional supporters, is nothing new. Through titles as mythical as Eduardo Manostijeras, Bitelchus, nightmare before Christmas (despite not being the director) or Sleepy Hollow, the Californian filmmaker has created a unique universe that combines the Gothic, the bizarre, the romantic and gloomy. In fact, when has avoided such aesthetics (read Mars attacks!, planet of the apes or the wonderful Ed Wood and Big fish), Burton has not gone as well as I would like to by what the return to this neo-Gothic aesthetic with Johnny Depp in the lead heralded an acknowledgement a resounding success.In general terms, we could say that Sweeney Todd is a good movie, although neither by far the best Tim Burton: despite all their awards and nominations, the excellent reviews it has received from the American press, and despite the fact that the sixth collaboration between Depp and Burton contains all the ingredients to become a new classicThere is something that ends not materialize and that something is its duration.With a length of nearly two hours, this dark Broadway musical adaptation may exasperate anyone who is not familiar with the universe Burton, because its starting slow in excess in a succession of very successful although somewhat cansinas musical permutations, especially because of the almost total lack of prose over the tape. Sweeney Todd is therefore a beautiful film with a fun although perhaps plot too predictable and whose main handycap lies, ironically, with its musical base, despite contain certainly brilliant moments.Already the fact that Sweeney Todd is nominated to the best costume design, Best Actor and best art direction, and it is not the best soundtrack, says a lot of which have been priorities of Tim Burton at the time of making the film. And it is that the only thing that differentiates Sweeney Todd of, for example, genius as the bride corpse or nightmare before Christmas, not animation, neither the plot nor the setting, but forty minutes of footage.On the other hand, if something worth mentioning of Sweeney Todd, is undoubtedly its production design and artistic, as always address, beautifully executed and carefully designed, moving to a Downtown grim and spellbinding London presented with a flat sequence simply master, while a server you mentioned somehow that Coppola use in Dracula during the phase licántropa of Oldman. And it is that if something is a master Tim Burton, in bizarre and oniric worlds at the same time extremely beautiful and romantic.In short, I will say that Sweeney Todd is a good movie in general terms, a sort of Sleepy hollow merged with The Rocky Horror Picture Show which contains great achievements and a plastic, on the other hand, regular beauty already in the Tim Burton film, but placed perhaps an excess of duration or, rather, a slowdown because of an abuse of their musical numbersas you look.Nevertheless, viewing essential.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4377

Iñaki Bilbao

EL BARCO DE LOS LOCOS (Ship of the Fools, the) 1965

muchocine

Interesting film of Stanley Kramer, almost always motivated to tell human stories, with dyes socio-political.

"Few dates of start of World War II, a large ship, with people of all countries, especially natural Germany, begin a journey linking between them."There are all colors, single divorced Mrs in life you are looking for a partner for the rest of his days, the pair of lovers of different social class, a pro-nazi German Jewish among them there will be their dimes and bickering."" This is add some 600 Spanish workers who worked in Cuba, bind to them, suffering an excess of passengers the ship"."-You is the more German I've met in my life. But don't realize the danger posed by the new party?-No, of course, that does not. We are in Germany and a half million of German Jews. What will you do with us, kill us all? "." Interesting film of Stanley Kramer, almost always motivated to tell human stories, with dyes socio-political.Here does the same, using the method of the successful "intrigue in the grand hotel", only that on a ship as a place where human feelings more found and bitter can give CITES causing a host of emotional ups and downs.The film is irregular in its development, being a very interesting times and slightly less. It depends on who are the characters, because these vary widely from each other, according to his personality.Thus, characters of the physician aboard, incarnated by Óskar Werner, or the lady who sees how away his youth, embodied by the great Vivien Leigh, are very interesting, as well as the of José Ferrer, magnificent in its role of pro-nazi German, who feels contempt for Jews and other people "of evil living".If, however, other characters, as the sixteen year-old girl that nobody out to dance and even of the young who must take care of at all times of his greedy Uncle are dispensable.There are intimate moments of great emotion, as when the doctor caresses you hair to Simone Signoret or great dialogues and situations, such as those that take place between Michael Dunn and Jewish German seller.Broadly, okay, but has somewhat excessive duration and some elements, like the external sets are not credible, noticing in excess cardboard stone, though after writing this last I get into imdb and I read that "won an Academy Award in the best art direction section!)." Well, I have not had good eye on this. Although I am still saying the same thing. I imagine that it refers to the decorations in interiors, Amen that it is not the same see a movie in the cinema than on TV.Also has a little too schematic drawing and something devious, of as / Spanish bailadores ACE, resulting in the end be a cool whores and their prostitutes.It is not bad and there are good interpretations, but is below many of its good author, among other things, and is my personal opinion, by influence on the dangers of the time nazismo.una past many years.It is very easy to talk about what already happened twenty years earlier, but good thing would have been to do something at the time. As my father says: "After seeing the balls to the cricket all we know is male". Then that.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1591

Francisco Bellón

Teresa, el cuerpo de Cristo

muchocine

It started with the band's controversial film of the season, and however stays in a portrait meapilas that well could have been made forty years ago, with censorship in full swing.

We have met with the Church kind reader. And after this small tribute to Miguel de Cervantes, there is to say that if it is difficult to make a film about religious subjects today without offending anyone, so too speak of it without hurting any kind of sensibility. For more centuries that have past by more theoretically evolved to be the human being, there are certain topics that will always cause controversy, and religion, whatever, is one of them. And if a it tape religious put you a title so striking and provocative as Teresa: the body of Christ, already have served a good serving of controversy, which will mean a greater expectation from the audience at the same time.Ten years after his first film, Ray Loriga returns the address to show us from a theoretical new point of view to Santa Teresa de Jesús, a key figure in the history of the Catholic Church. Loriga intended to bring the viewer a character well known to all, both books of history and previous films, with a fresh and new vision, away to Saint Theresa of pure mysticism and showing his human and carnal side. However, Teresa: the body of Christ moves away from the commercial and initial intention of Loriga, offering insight into blessed and prudish character; rather than portraying a woman with lights and shadows, and their struggle, the filmmaker conducts a purely hagiographic portrait. Also it must be said that one of the keys of the step to the posterity of Santa Teresa was his literary work, and such work appears on the tape in a disgraceful background. The script, part of which the own verses of Santa Teresa, make it up (in a surreptitious manner) is flat and devoid of feeling. The direction of Loriga is lousy, slow until exhaustion, and lacking any notion of what the film rhythm, which happily contributes its nefarious installation. Ray Loriga cares more than the visual aspect of his work that the story itself, and that happens invoice from the opening sequence. There are a number of scenes, the daydreams of Santa Teresa, in which the tape stripe as ludicrous. The only positive aspects of so ineffable title are costume design and photography of José Luis Alcaine, really merit taking into account the desire of its director to make colorful pictures in motion. Best of the tape, is certainly the interpretation contained of Paz Vega, showing all her natural acting ability with a brutal change of registration and sober.Teresa: The body of Christ started with the band's controversial film of the season, and however stays in a portrait meapilas that well could have been made forty years ago, with censorship in full swing. Perhaps some critics should form a secret Inquisition, in which we would act moved to preserve the good name of the film, leading to works such as this to his well-deserved fate: the purifying fire.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/177

Vsancha

Psicosis

muchocine

Hitchcock leads me to where you want to, as you want and when you want to, a real lesson in how create a magnificent horror film

There are films that if they are already a myth of cinema, although there are people who strive to get sequels and remakes. Psychosis is a myth of the cinema with a beginning and an end, masterfully made by Alfred Hitchcock, although as I said some try to get money by the genius of another showing his lack of ideas. I had the pleasure of seeing her for the first time this summer and it was amazing, films with too much fame and much recognition usually them have some reluctance to see them and I think many expectations about the film which can to end disappointed, with psychosis not occurred, I was foolishly watching the screen during the footage of the film. Hitchcock leads me to where it wants, as you want and when you want to, a real lesson in how create a magnificent horror film without having to show anything explicit only hinting.A perfect script with a soundtrack that perfectly accompanies the film creating a climax is magnificent. It's great from the beginning, with the McGuffin of the theft of the money, with the arrival at the motel and until the end. With the legendary Norman Bates (beautifully played by Anthony Perkins) and that mysterious motel with that terrifying Fund House, an argument that has been copied to the satiety or maybe is not that it has been copied if not that psychosis is the perfection of the suspense film, has it all. With mythical scenes such as the shower, which I was not surprised because of the numerous times that they have put it on television, a real bitch. Little more I can say I this movie has that not been said already, a landmark in cinema of psychopaths, an authentic masterpiece of essential viewing.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3232

Kiko de España

Redacted

muchocine

Hard as a rock and cruel as the news. Palm return to hell and everything remains the same.

Redacted is 2.0 iron hearts. It is based on real events and tells how American soldiers raped a 15 year-old girl in Iraq killed his family and then burned his body. It is not a comedy, no.The director of works so fascinating and captivating as the ghost of paradise or Carrie gives a return of nut to the approach of the film in Viet Nam to continue showing the world rotten in which we live, where seems to be no room for sanity, dignity and humanity through a speech in common with many of the titles seen in the edition of Sitges40the live news camera. In addition to Palm shows news, websites and newspapers of hand of the peloton, forming a narrative set as experimental as fascinating and disturbing. As Viet Nam Eriksson (that poignant Michael J Fox departed for his roles as "niñato") will be here another soldier with remorse that will uncover the scandal, McCoy, that as in the other film resulting Ripper with a final speech that makes goose bumps.If we didn't have enough with the recreation of the assumptions made the director ends the movie with a real photo gallery saved for the end a frightening image which causes the viewer suffers more than the account and leave the cinema with an idea too clear what happened. Courageous and provocative, as in the good old days.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/370

Tito Chinchan

Pepito piscinas

muchocine

The film is very bad, but the appearances of Tip and Coll are essential viewing.

As a child I wanted to see this film, not because me it fascinase the argument nor the big players, not even by the suggestive poster, much less. If not to discover what referred my family when in closed circles, while we were in pools or beaches commented by the bajini mira to pepito pools goes out there and everyone is dying of laughter at the sight of a bathing suit type cojón - outside and a man more cool than an eight. That time, my mother.The film is a man (don Fernando Esteso) which is a well-known car salesman. Its scope of action are the swimming pools and the boités with surprising results, especially that can't swim. By accidents of fate, one day discovers launched seductive networks a girl to run a rallie on the Costa del Sol. That more you want? If we have cars, women, beach, erostismo, Estesismo and more.So yes, I would like to a little more, that the thing is too weak. And it is that the script is very, very flojote, with a criminal outcome. In positive terms, it has a soundtrack of the caspismo Summit, created exclusively for the film. From time to time appear Tip and Coll, without having nothing to do with development and come to mind, giving you a great point that saves the bonfire to the final product. Special attention to the scene which Tip sell you a car to Coll, masterful. And look at that boy didn't understand the humor of these gentlemen, but when I saw this movie almost I fall of the Chair.In short, the film is very bad, but the appearances of Tip and Coll are essential viewing. It has more myth than film.PS: "give me cream in the buttocks says Tip to Coll both sausages in their black suits".Pd2: I do not understand by that if they wanted to make a special Tip and Coll, put you all the roll of film of adorno.P.D.3: Fuck in the scene driving a Mercedes, what you see is the national I, which has changed slightly, specifically at the edges which is now full of homes. Things.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1987

Oscar Cantero

La sombra de nadie

muchocine

A film of suspense and terror that get startled the old way, without having to resort to the viscera and blood.

The shadow of nobody is a film of suspense and terror to the old-fashioned. It is not based its upheavals in the viscera or noises, but the recreation of situations that create atmospheres of tension which van in crescendo until that happens what has to happen. or not. This second work of Pablo Malo delves into the dark and gloomy environments we see in cold winter sun, and sharpens them much more, something that makes the supernatural theme of the plot. Framed within a rural, typical of the Pyrenees from the end of the 1960s people, the result is a film that keeps the interest of the Viewer from the beginning until the end, and allowing is you enjoy him for several aspects, such as that of a well-crafted script, complex personal relationships, some wonderful and of course landscapesa central thread worked and concise, although by no means simple.Grosso modo, the story is told the adventures of a teacher coming into a retired village to take a sabbatical because of an important labour mishap. In the municipality there is a female boarding school in which a girl has died recently, but apparently still loitering there. Interactions between the characters are immediate and intense, and although you run the risk of being repetitive, I must influence the ability to transmit sensations without dialogues with this film.On the downside, the excessive darkness of many levels and a not entirely round ending. In any case, the virtues that defects are larger and more numerous.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3885

Francisco Bellón

Interview

muchocine

Interview is a fierce, biting and acidic critique to the world of the star-system, frivolous and interests surrounding it and everything what generates as a result.

For those who are dedicated to the film information, a movie like Interview we are happy for several reasons. First of all, we like to see our alter ego film singing the forties a Hollywood diva. But fortunately, all stars as the character of Sienna Miller, nor all the informants are like the character portrays Steve Buscemi. No, they are much worst on each side.And it is that although it hurts us, at the end an interview not just remain but a clash between two people with completely opposite objectives. This is another reason why we like a film as Interview, that it leads to the general public a history (distorted and taken to the extreme, that Yes) of every day for many of us. Full of references and tributes to the late Theo Van Gogh (the fan in this ridiculous restaurant, that detonating truck of history), author of the tape version Steve Buscemi. Buscemi shows the side more wild and competitive of the human being in a theoretically as civilized as the film industry and journalism environment. It is the strange way in which these two characters face, two selfish cynics who are such for which, what makes it different to Interview. And the magnificent interpretative duel between a Sienna Miller who signs their best work to date, and an actorazo of the likes of Steve Buscemi, as large as ignored by the scene to criticize in Interview.Interview is a fierce, biting and acid criticism to the world of the star-system, frivolous and interests surrounding it and everything what generates as a result. And for those who we live closely, although our alter ego is not very well stopped, seeing a movie that shows all the magnificent decadence surrounding the celebrities we are happy.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/306

Calaf

Cars

muchocine

It isn't at the height of previous works of the company, but it is worthwhile to enjoy it on the big screen

This afternoon I have been the last production of the marriage finally well agreed between Diney and the famous company of Pixar animation. The boy fish ate the great. And I liked, perhaps because it has entered a field so far not used to Pixar as he was more mature than previous productions audiences. It is curious that another King of animation, DreamWorks, with successes led to a not so child audience (the Prince of Egypt, Antz, Shrek...) has played in my view in his last movie, neighbors invaders, precisely to the sin of child.I have read poor reviews, as the of Theophilus, that missing humour, more action, and see the moralina for the kids too hard. I however am tired of Visual coasters, why have enjoyed Cars, because it has a central development without tumult, without laps of Bell, with settled characters who know how to convey morals curiously seen also in neighbors invaders: the importance of the friendship of the family; only here through the nostalgia of a better time spent (in the form of people abandoned by the construction of a motorway) which we should rescue while the protagonist rescues himself of his hubris, learning to work as a team.But first let me down, and yes it is true that isn't precisely a hilarious film of half smile I flipé with each song, the passages of road and the beautiful technical invoice, as well as with some moments of the end, with enough emotion to go to taste of cinema.It isn't at the height of previous works of the company, such as the Toy Story, monsters, Inc. and the Incredibles, but it is worthwhile to enjoy it on the big screen, though one creates this type of movies is to do it at home with the nephews.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3898

Kiko de España

Matrimonio Compulsivo

muchocine

Kind of remake improved blind love, The heartbreak kid is proof that we are still the Farrelly and that together with the factory Apatow is overpopulation of superheroes from more acojonante laughter in the history of cinema.

The heartbreak kid is the best movie of the Farrelly (which closed its trilogy of perfect comedies after Kingpin and something happens with Mary) in a long time.Managers shed his soft side, that side tontuna which ruined almost all of its recent proposals (except may that stuck to you), to give us ration and average of bad taste and canine humor. To make us laugh and grief in equal parts and to forget any shred of normalcy and correction, yuppie!Eddie Cantrow is a Bachelor wretched spent time with his father's seventy-seven years (Jerry Stiller giving free rein to his wild side) and with his colleague jerk always, one of these secondary (and in this movie there are a handful of them) that only the Farrelly are capable of creating for the screen.After a five year relationship that ended in nothing, he falls for a perfect girl at first sight, that he married a few weeks and begins heading to honeymoon Mexico. A moon of honey which will become a nightmare so real and full of bad taste destroyer that hurts, as it should be.Compulsive marriage has been de much of the criticism and the American public for not being fun: don't forget that there either they laugh with the Woody Allen movies or just love with the John Carpenter, so after reading the reviews and reviews of the movie already I knew (and I was not wrong) that probably I would meet a peli1 - quite cerda2 - enough amoral3 - quite enhanced remake of blind love largaEspecieThe heartbreak kid is proof that we are still the Farrelly and that together with the Apatow factory form the overpopulation of superheroes from more acojonante laughter of the history of the Cine.Y despite being one hundred fifteen minutes passes as a sigh thanks in part to these wonderful soundtracks of the brothers, that you sneak up to the VenegasPD Juliet: See credits

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/263

Jeremy Fox

Cars

muchocine

Pixar stays true to his style, and proof of this is the hectic pace that has the movie from the first second.

A few days ago in the morning I went to the cinema UGC Ciné Cité of Madrid to see "Ultraviolet". Upon arrival, my surprise and joy were capitalized to discover that a preview of "Cars", the new and highly anticipated had film from Pixar. Unfortunately I had no essential invitation to enter. But behold, Providence in the form of friendly Lady, nice and with an entry of over did the miracle of let me see the movie (I have to highlight also the kindness of workers of cinema that sent back me the money from the entrance).Once sitting in my armchair and before seeing the film I could enjoy the teaser trailer of "Ratatouille", that on the big screen is a joy, and "The man Orchestra" short film that Pixar always shows before their movies and rigor that deserves comment apart.But let's go to the grain. "Cars", directed by John Lasseter and Joe Ranft (emotive homage to the deceased film director during the closing credits), account history of Lightning McQueen, young and successful racing car which by avatars of the destination and on the eve of the race of his life, is lost and trapped in a village on the route 66.Me would like to stress that dubbing does not seem as awful as I expected after hearing the news about the famous that doblarían some characters. Such eventually famous appear rather little and not come to bother too much, although I would have loved to see in original version to enjoy the voices of Owen Wilson, and above all, Paul Newman. Temáticamente the film is quite topical: cocky and selfish character that falls in an environment different from the usual and has to learn to be better. Along the way he discovers the importance of true friendship and the power of love. Fund, the typical singing the honesty and the beauty of the traditional village life with accelerated sophistication of the modern world (in this case symbolized by the racing world).But there is something that you cannot be denied to Pixar is that each new production manages to beat the previous visually. They are world leaders in animated 3D film and difficult it will be to lose his throne if they have to compete with films majas but lacking brilliance as "Neighbors invaders" (see critical) or "Ice Age 2" (see critical). If in "Buscando a Nemo", those responsible for Pixar reflected as never the marine environment now have decided by asphalt and races, with equally brilliant results.Pixar stays true to his style, and proof of this is the hectic pace that has the movie from the first second, which makes it one of the most entertaining films of this year. Nor are lacking the emotional moments than not sensibleros. And it is that occasionally the camera movements and images reach beauty and perfection that excited alone. All this seasoned, as it could not be otherwise, the humor brand of the House and with the waste of imagination to create a world that is like ours but which is inhabited exclusively by car.It is true that it does not reach the spectator as other tapes of Pixar. This may be because it is not so easy to feel identified with a car as a superhero or a fish (although saying sounds so ridiculous) or to that feeling of déjà vu that has the story. But all that gives just because once the projection, one leaves the film with a smile from ear to ear and with the conviction of having passed one of the year's funniest moments in a movie theater. And to raise the hand that can boast of having released a film as well in recent times.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/339

Alvaro Oliva

Aullidos

muchocine

Another of so many genre films coming to our screens but rightly have a few characters of flesh and blood.

At first I thought that it was a remake of howls, Joe Dante, but appears to be no, and that only it's translation, as in original version title is The Breed. moving away the werewolves, in this howls creatures do not stop being ferocious dogs who have been exposed to some experiments. The argument is fairly typical: a group of friends are going to spend a few days at a cabin in the middle of a "deserted" island. Will be suddenly tells that they are not as alone as they believe, and that man's best friend is milling in the vicinity.Wes Craven, an institution, produces this film directed by Nick Mastendrea, one of his pupils, and that surprised me, that on this occasion there are characters that are not mere mindless puppets. If we were already in Scream Williamson and Craven given guidelines and analysed the clichés of the horror film, showing us how always the female character climbs the stairs rather than out the door in howls the characters think and Act, which as it stands the courtyard is quite welcome. It is true that the argument is quite simple but not let us relax, keeping a good pulse and a very successful pace, once has completed the presentation of characters, Yes, that may be too long, but nonetheless interesting. Michelle Rodriguez leads the cast together to Oliver Hudson, son of Goldie Hawn and to which we have seen in the series Dawson grows. Together with the actors are the other protagonists, dogs. There to congratulate the team of training because the truth have achieved an excellent job.In final howls of Wes Craven is one of many genre films coming to our screens but rightly have a few characters of flesh and blood, they think and behave as we all believe that we would do in real life.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3214

Ana Belén Pacheco

3:10 to Yuma

muchocine

It is a good film in the West, it has all the elements to be, has good actors, good script, some nice secondary but focuses both on the figure of Ben Wade that sometimes or with great effort can steal a scene Crowe.

Dan Evans (Christian Bale), which is stiff pasta decides to volunteering to deliver to the dangerous outlaw Ben Wade (Russell Crowe), the objective is to be on time on the train from 3: 10 that will take him to prison in Yuma but members of his band is not going to be easy.Now am going to recognize my illiteracy and despite having seen much Western classic never saw the 1957 version with Glenn Ford. Rain of tomatoes for me, rectificaré, I have it on the list of things to do. Without knowing the original say that Yuma 3:10To, still no official date of premiere in Spain) is a little slow.A two-hour movie based on two shootings can do. There is no way to unite a footage so beast with so little action. It is a good film in the West, it has all the elements to be, has good actors, good script, some nice secondary but focuses both on the figure of Ben Wade that sometimes or with great effort can steal a scene Crowe. Christian Bale (between Batmans seen you very desmejorado) nor of Ben Foster (who me resembles strangely Vincent Cassell of Blueberry) give the replica and work well. Perhaps that is what saves the tape, its director James Mangold knows do their job and made the film with efectivismo and precision without any error to attribute that technically and visually it is perfect.Much I have read about the resurgence of the genre thanks to the not inconsiderable box office of this tape. But I do not think that he repeated the success in Europe and I do not think that a public accustomed to rapid consumption cinema is ready to return to films of the fifties/sixties but that only time will tell.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3549

Ramón Balcells

Redacted

muchocine

This mockumentary belonged to that style of films made to an audience that will see something risky, something that touches them and conciencíe. Do not miss.

Simply devastating last and unrecognizable RAID film the great Brian de Palma. While us has taught master's degree with some sublime untouchables or left indifferent with an unattractive dalia, already veteran director of the famous Scarface changes fully register to offer a truly stunning mockumentary, hard as a stone. Is entitled Redacted, which give the following meanings: "Edit or prepare to publish a corrected document that uncomfortable, confidential or personal information has been stolen." "Describe documents in which censorship has been committed". Yes, truly terrible and unjust is this Assembly that many bring between hands for not bringing to light certain atrocities. And this is the reality in which we live? Unfortunately, and well known by some (not all), Yes. Palm as a thousand directors, has transmitted to the public a plea against the war by something such as film, something which I think is necessary and very intelligent; but certainly has done something even more meritorious, and risk to such an extent that we ourselves want to cover us us eyes to see that images, because despite being, many of us, aware that occurs in Iraq, can not bear the raw and hard reality happening several kilometres. Nor is it our fault, but the true essence of the message that has been sent to us by the director.This mockumentary belonged to that style of films made to an audience that will see something risky, something that touches them and conciencíe. Palma makes a virtuoso travel, brutal and baffling at various times, to place the viewer in a world apparently known. There are many scenes, dialogues and Redacted pictures which we dipped in a naughty and manipulative universe: the stark reality. And the message I want to send is none other than the absolute recommendation for anyone who cares, although it may not improve the world in which we live. Do not miss.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4155

José A. Peig

En el valle de Elah

muchocine

Do great movie, honda and rich in dramatic records, depicted with sobriety and Cadence, without artifice vacuos that so often tends melodrama? Sung?.

In the valley of Elah is a film which refers to issues already mentioned in this booklet in relation to two films dissected and put your finger in the wound of our turbulent present: the creation of myths that subjugate and deform reality (flags of our fathers, Clint Eastwood), and in the consciousness disturbance caused by new media audiovisual registration (the strange there is en TI)(, Neil Jordan).The film opens with images of war in Iraq - reproduced on a computer screen - transmitting the disturbing feeling not to apprehend a reality evasive, misleading. Search for Hank (Tomme Lee Jones) runs two strata Visual and plot they build an x-ray of the lost son (the recordings and the data of the police investigation). Such a search involves a damning review and deconstruction of the values and myths played in Hank: Army, sacrifice, homeland, democracy, symbolized in the flag which reverses its position in that journey since the beginning until an end which is a declaration of defeatism, which is understood as a profound criticism of the foreign policy of the current Government USA, but transcends the easy use of the pacifist pamphlet.After a process of demystification, reality - always subject to distortion of the images and data - which we see through the TV or any of the modern audiovisual supports, ends up revealing their secrets. It is particularly significant that only Hank manages to be aware of the meaning of the recordings sent by his son when research data allow to know the real criminals. What we see on television or on the Internet is subject to our beliefs, a view backed by the set of dogmas that give a sense and a justification to the homeland. And yet there is no war heroes, because we all fear. Goodbye to the myths, ideological support that, undoubtedly comes from the hand of Clint Eastwood, collaborator of Paul Haggis, and above all because the message is the same as we saw in flags of our fathers.The pain before the truth has a great expression in the eyes of Tomme Lee Jones, actor who manages to handle each dramatic outline in a temperate manner and in accordance with the essence of the work: moral degeneration in a syncopated narrative that combines urban drama with notes pertaining to a pessimistic view of humans. The almost monochrome photography makes the same bleak austerity expressed in a script that gives voice to the characters and meaning to the silences is represented on stage. The greatest tragedy lies in what is not said. As we can see, great movie, deep and rich in dramatic records, depicted with sobriety and Cadence, without artifice vacuos that so often tends "toned" melodrama.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1719

Nüx

Time

muchocine

For those who, like me, you think that recently Asians are aren't doing the clip too much, this film will only confirm you that hypothesis, when not make matters worse.

I am going to tell you a little bit of a film which you've put the label of "criticism of Billboard", but that will make some months it was released in Spain. The movie in question is the Korean Time.Para who, like me, you believe that recently Asians are aren't doing the clip too much, this film won't but confirm you this scenario, when not make matters worse. Programs like yellow Humor will become small travesurillas showcases compared the psychopathies showing in Time. It all starts when the protagonist of the film undergo a cosmetic surgery operation to restructure their facial features, it expected to thus recover the passion lost with your partner. This is not an isolated case, multitude of aesthetic centres are engaged today desorientalizar traits, trend that seems to me a terrible embarrassing, therefore denotes not only the shortcomings of self-esteem of this people and surface of its society, but it also implies deny and despise roots that, not olidemos, go back to more than three thousand years old.This film reflects that criticism to degenerate current Eastern civilization from the point of view of one of its members, which is why, I think, should be taken into account as true, not wanting to say it, nor much less, which has not tended to exaggeration. But this is essentially a film of feelings. Some also exaggerated and surrealists jealousy intermingle with a sickly love to get to the key to the film: the eternal dissatisfaction of the human being. Participants join in a cyclic repetition of scope of objectives and subsequent disappointment, but which, far from the vision of cycle setting out my "Hellenes", it is not retroalimentativa, they, on the contrary, it is self-destructive.Addition to the room of the pathologically paranoid protagonist is suspicious and worryingly similar to mine, also noted as a curiosity the erotic beauty and special symbolism of the sculpture park that the characters create culture to come. This Park contributes largely to the nice picture of the film.Magnificent interpretations of the two main actors deserve more than this mention, but well, it is here said. After seeing them is inevitable to ask whether it is possible to interpret the psychology of a madman as well without being it. I doubt that this dilemma, seasoned with the horrifying and bloody images of operations, let me sleep tonight. And here I can (and want to) say of this interesting film which, however, gets surreal in one or another aspect.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2832

Bruji

Death Proof

muchocine

After the direct reference to films as point limit zero, La Indecente Mary or Larry the madman, movie fan memory drags us into cult titles such as Christine or the devil on wheels.

Excessive passion to lead shown by the Director of Tennessee, its proven movie fan militancy and its vast film culture, ranging from the series up the Z transform a slasher of the seventies in the attractive argument to fascinara to filmmakers such as Carpenter or Spielberg. Death Proof is the contribution of Quentin Tarantino to the Grindhouse project and a tribute to his own filmography.I guess that one of the direct consequences of having released two films comprising Grindhouse separately, and marketed them as "standard products", has been the flood of protests voiced by viewers on the "poor quality" of Planet Terror; that, surely, has led to the emergence of a funny "note of company" in some cinemas, according to which "the flaws showing Death Proof are intentional". Easier would have been explained from the beginning, that both are part of a tribute to low-budget films which, in the 1970s, swarm by American screening rooms. Once made the warning, it is important to know that multiple technical shortcomings that accompany these productions, (Death Proof and Planet Terror), not undermine quality to the final outcome of the same. The loss of sound, the striped frames, intervals that are offered in black and white and the disastrous Assembly, are only a mere fact anecdotal, and another of the many genius that characterize two stories, in many respects, perfect.To look seriously at Death Proof, must take into account that deal with the films of Quentin Tarantino is not an easy task. Entering it, involves twinning, inevitably, the difficulty with the utmost of respect. Above its readiness for the B series, his tribute to cheap films karatekas, of his tendency to the creation of situations, in appearance, absurd, and its obstinacy for drawing characters, in not few occasions, unrealistic; a unique film wisdom, which covers all genres, is and culminates in a style unmistakable, impossible to find in contemporary cinema. His original way of directing, the inclusion of unstructured scripts, Scorsese inheritance; the recreation of impeccable usual scene implementations of Kurosawa, and the obsession with details, make a filmmaker of risk, with courage to the limit, only comparable to that always demonstrated the Welles himself. There is no doubt that Tarantino is one of the few great remaining.The trouble with "the big" is that, sometimes, licensed a joke to lovers and give them with one of those stories that can only look with benevolence knowing the prior work of its directors are allowed. Remember that even Huston took advantage of a holiday by the Mediterranean to the seventh art an unspeakable parody of the Maltese Falcon entitled the mockery of the devil; and this, just prior to publicize the bastards without glory, seemed the right time to not shoot seriously. Fortunately, that is not the case with Death Proof and, once again, Tarantino returns to show their worth, to surprise, to revolutionize the tedious film scene.What starts as a typical bloody crimes, a 1970s slasher film, soon becomes attractive argument to fascinara to directors such as Carpenter or Spielberg. After the direct reference to films as point limit zero, La Indecente Mary or Larry the madman, movie fan memory drags us into cult titles such as Christine or the devil on wheels. If this applies the "Tarantino touch", the success is assured. The master definition of characters, some of them, drawn with only two strokes; endless dialogues, that only in the best classical stories manage to capture the viewer's attention; the profusion of details, which are its irreplaceable place in the resolution of the outcome; the continuous winks to lovers of cinema, and Spanish viewers (remember the posters of movies starring Charo López); explicit references taken from Pulp Fiction, Jackie Brown and Kill Bill, made in Death Proof one of the best films of the year.To remember, the bet of the filmmaker for the massage on the feet, the delight that produce you mobile phones, incitement to the reading, the bright yellow, weapons women taking and playback. For the glory of the film, the shooting of one of the best cars in its history persecutions. To his followers, the tireless search for volume two.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/786

Bloody Will

El ilusionista

muchocine

"The illusionist" is an impressive film that lacks the three deadly sins of the current Hollywood: pretentiousness, scripts made in the fourth bathroom and divos as only solid part of the film.

"That crude copy" I said to myself when I saw the poster for "The illusionist" a few days of launching the first pics of "The Prestige". Edward Norton, Jessica Biel and Paul Giamatti. "That so strange distribution", ask me again. Total, my entire predisposition to not pass a as revenge of advance premiere with a theme that my beloved Nolan due embroidery. "Do result: sometimes I am asshole?""The illusionist" is a stunning film. Perhaps you equipareis to name such an "excellent" but that is not what I mean. The way in which the story in the film is flawless. It does flow, and as such, keeps you in constant attention to what happens on screen. It's like one of those books that will cost you leave them despite having the eyes as brótolas. Nothing seems misplaced, and will find her how and why rather than leaving the end credits, something that is very complicated in the current film.Directed by Neil Burger, whose first film "Interview with the Assassin" I have read, the film is the adaptation of a Steven Millhauser story about a magician in the Vienna of the Victorian era. Shot entirely in the Czech Republic, "The illusionist" has managed to finish the consistency of your script with a few fabulous foreign. All the recreations, included the theatre where the wizard protagonist acts every night, are unbeatable. What I mean by all this corny litany is the atmosphere that has managed to recreate the director you wraps both or more as the story that counts. Of such history better know right and necessary. Fear gives me mention some scenes of the film, simply wonderful, that you agradeceréis keep you in the dark to see it, because every step and every event is as unexpected as the previous. A magician, (Edward Norton), a lady (Jessica Biel), and a somewhat neurotic police (Paul Giamatti). Their lives are interlinked to an unconventional ending.Sorpresón gives me Paul Giamatti. After having wanted to give two you born in "La Joven water", a Victorian aupa Grissom gives me. His performance as a policeman who is torn between licking ass or serve the law is as simple as genial, and they should make a spin-off for him only.Edward Norton does not surprise me, because this guy is good wherever you are. Tell me a single film is not where more than right. Jessica Biel just there to say that his interpretation is not visibly below their partners, and that there is much in a film where the duel Norton-Giamatti is anthological.The villain is Rufus Sewell? if not. One of the actors most villains has incarnated, and that makes in specialist. His drawing of a King without ethics or moral adds more attuned to the main chorus and that is why, as I have said, the result is rounded over not being able to.You already vendréis to tell me some which is shit, but "The illusionist" lacks the three deadly sins of the current Hollywood: pretentiousness, scripts made in the fourth bathroom and divos as only solid part of the film. Is a romantic tale (abstain "A todo Gas" fan), with good very good and bad very bad, and as says its motto: "Nothing is what it seems"?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4123

Patri

Sweeney Todd

muchocine

The film is a real Marvel, a vibrant, exciting, musical with aroma to classic musical and also old horror film, a mixture of music, blood, and black humor with a twisted touch of Tim Burton.

Finally came the new work of Tim Burton, the director of the "personal and dark unierso", something which already has become topic of both repeat it, but that is true, its staff work full theaters of fantasy, black humour and an Impressionist view of stories that fit.Sweeney Todd is a tormented Barber who returns to London with desire for revenge, after having been imprisoned unjustly by a judge who wanted to quitare in the middle to stay with his wife and daughter.It is based on a musical of Stephen Sodheim, one of the most important authors of musical theatre, in turn, the story of Sweeney Todd is based on several stories and legends of the 19th century that spoke of a murderous Barber, sometimes says that it can be based on real events, but it has not been demonstrated.The film is a real Marvel, a vibrant, exciting, musical with aroma to classic musical and also old horror film, a mixture of music, blood, and black humor with a twisted touch of Tim Burton.Johnny Depp is simply great, demonstrating once again the piece of the good connection that exists between him and Tim Burton and actor which isbeing the perfect alter ego of the director on the screen; on this occasion shows that in addition to being good actor can sing, and makes it quite well, like Helena Bonham Carter, according to Tim Burton, was the most difficult level singing role, but is up to, forming a dark and perfect Duet with Johnny Depp.Sweeney Todd is one of the best films that have been in recent years and unique with a vibrant and powerful soundtrackworthy of the best of the musicals and brilliantly performed by all actors.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2621

Dragon negro

Ratatouille

muchocine

Ratatouille is a classic of the factory from viewing as they already are Toy Story, Finding Nemo and the Incredibles.

Pixar proves once again, and with astonishing ease, the because it is the Queen of the cinema of digital animation, no longer by a visual quality increasingly achieved, but also by the quality of his scripts, which confirms again that the comedy in the classic style is still possible without having to fall into the easy joke or be irreverent and also makes it clear that it can be emotional and extol values such as love, friendship, family, or personal improvement aside from the typical characteristic of Disney.A ñoñeria through the steps of a very special rata attended the pursuit of a dream, the chef, achieved through a human being a loser who suddenly see their fate change to become of the overnight in an expert chefa reputation to immediately come big and that will jeopardize the team formed by the two inseparable since that one depends on the other. Exceptional success story which involves the relationship between these two characters and as establishing the communication between the two, although it would have been easier to opt for a more traditional path, the bet here taken is risky, but also brings consistency to the film and a different point of view.Punto y aparte is the technical and visual quality of the film where Pixar manages to overcome again and outweigh the "harder still" posed by each film. One of the major challenges was to represent food and meals of realistically, texture, color, form and movement. And go if it does, although not abused, if we can see numerous vegetables such as onions, celery, potatoes, and more, all them almost real and clearly defined, as well as cooked dishes, sauces, etc. Perhaps the unfinished even to get some more realism in people, instead of opt out so cartoony faces, I guess it will come someday that will be making an animated film where the human characters come to seem real.After that with Cars the Pixar flojeara a little, very little, this Ratatouille again to study at the top and its director Brad Bird as one of the best directors of animation at the moment. Ratatouille is a classic of the factory from viewing as they already are Toy Story, Finding Nemo and the Incredibles.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3738

Iñaki Bilbao

Battle for Haditha

muchocine

Film necessary about the war of Iraq, but not convincing at all.

"Haditha (Iraq), November 19, 2005." Iraqi insurgents bombed a convoy of us marines and kill the officer most appreciated by his comrades. Incensed by this loss, his young companions carried out a brutal reprisal. Their violent house searches have as a result the massacre of 24 people, many of whom are women and children, tragic victims of war who are unable to control. The marines are also victims: are attacked, injured and forced to respond the way you have taught them. But, when events occur at high speed and in circumstances of extreme stress, one can accuse assassination to the marines who were in the line of fire? "."Interesting film of Nick Broomfield, which is worth seeing, above all, for its undeniable documentary value on a true, sadly remembered fact and which still colea, given the similarities between this fact narrated and many others that are repeating in the war of Iraq, from November 2005 until today.Therefore has the value of the current, because still the human being has not learned to value human life, or to be able to curb barbarity which nests in the hearts of people, at least in certain emotional strés, or superseded by the more Miraflores situations circumstances where morals, ethics or other positive emotional connotations, merman to violence that is palpable and even lives in the environment.However, and beyond all this, I repeat you cannot be denied, we are witnessing, in general terms to a film not many strictly cinematographic virtues.The technique employed in many scenes, the camera on his shoulder, aims to empower the tape of a documentary stamp, to make everything more credible, more realistic. I'm not saying that it fails, but there isn't a good staging and the script lacks depth, being all too evident.The interpreters, real marines who fought at Iraq, do quite well, especially which plays simpar Cape Ramirez. But given her, at least, moral and psychological complexity would have been better that carried you out a professional actor, as seen in the scene that, finally, speaking evil of war, their superiores.un little late for what is ago and orders do men at his command. Hero, killer? This question in the film is. It can be trying to answer this question with a dilemma, to a controversy, but as it looks great in the beautiful final sequence, the man, as individual, equipped with rationing, is ultimately responsible for what you do. It almost always has the door open to act in one way or another. There are some good action scenes, as the key moment of the explosion of the vehicle of the marines and the immediate response, but also others that are not understood very well, been quite false, as when the aforementioned Cape Ramirez le tends hand a woman who, because of his responsibility, you just become a widow.Anyway, that very well and laudable the pretension of denunciation of some embarrassments, which hopefully not repeat never, but not is a good film, it is much improved in all aspects. I don't know if the general public will convince you.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/916

Kiko de España

Brick

muchocine

You have to enter the game. If you can, you will enjoy as long ago. Fun but dense, slow but fast, original but a photocopy. Very good film today.

You have to enter the game. If you can, you will enjoy as long ago. If not, can finish leaving the room (that happens by doubt between Brick and why rubbing the legs?) Brick, the directorial debut of Rian Johnson is a conglomerate of noir by which they poke Houston, Welles, Hawks, Chandler and Hammett and leads one of the kids of things about Martians, i.e. of an experiment. And the experiment turns out to be a noir of the of all life, with his fatal woman, his criminal in the shadow, his private detective as hard as the rock and his Intelligent Assistant and a constantly present in the film Chinatown (see the knife attack and the strips in the nose of the protagonist) in Brick there is also a little elephantwith his AUL (film school where he studied the director) their teenage freaks and, above all, with his filming: 20 days. During this time Johnson banned the cast viewing of the gangster film, but if recommended them reading Hammett or Chandler and seen the results the kids broke squarely in her both as the director himself.I say above that you have to enter it from the beginning, because it may be shocking (although I don't know the reason, anything can happen in a movie, not is it that?), because see American Pie kids acting as Lords of Chinatown (for example) can catch you by surprise.A major success of the film is to demonstrate that, first and foremost, these characters, both the (anti) heroes such as criminals, are students of Institute living with their parents and that, in addition to the obvious pressure by the drug trafficking and murder (are criminals) have to worry about the lack of attendance, and that is fun, original and surprising.The truth is all you need high school is the Institute and the students, because the dialogues and situations are 100% Noir, becoming at times as dense as any other peli gender of fifty or sixty years ago. Understandable is that the tape could see in Sitges, because it is so pure (speaking of noir), which seems to scifi, such forms of talk (are you sure you want to be sure?) and these methods: the universe of Brick is a particular MicroWorld that the director has invented and is as real as absurd (the mother of The Pin serving milk "friends" of his son)(the head of studies talking about the protagonist as if they were in a police station rather than in the Office of the school.)The actors are great, especially that revelation who is Joseph Gordon-Levitt, which creates a Brendan that little has to envy to Sam Spade, a "strips" dim-witted nerd looking but that resources and stubbornness is almost a machine to kill, something normal on the other hand, because if not possibly end underground. Lucas Haas is The Pin, the man behind the crime, a character a little excessive, but fundamental, represents a connection between the world that creates the director and ours in a way that can not even the protagonist, that we only see the alarm clock of your home: The Pin lives with his mother and in the basement has a room where plays the role of godfather of the mafia of the kids in their twenties.Emile de Ravin (lost, they the hills have eyes) is the character that triggers the events and Nora Zehetner is the femme fatale. Shaft, I mean Richard Roundtree portraying the head of studies. A movie fun but dense, slow but fast, original but a photocopy. Very good film today. A 8´75.PD: very bad Alphaville theaters despite the "redesign".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2169

Emilio Calvo de Mora

El buen pastor

muchocine

Portrait of the people in whose hands the fate of the world was but that could not govern himself.

Or God or the King, the case is that there is an army of anonymous servers faithful, priests or shoemakers, mercenaries who sacrifice the personal life, its intimate avatars, his honest desire to be happy in this world, to serve a necessarily high reality which, in the De Niro film is the homeland, the bars and stars, the cluster of ethical codes that make up the invisible frame on which underpins our society.What is the good Shepherd isn't the CIA and its origins, is not a prospecting on the roots of espionage in the United States or is at least not únicamento that: it is a long, failing, story about the gray and almost always little appreciated weight of the officer, who is, after all, is delivered in body and soul to the slow movementdesigned, meticulously designed pieces on the Board in the world. The character of Matt Damon, Edward Wilson, is the quintessence of the essential pawn, that soldier that meets not only the orders but that this obedience is a kind of intimate relevance that makes you, without hesitation, sacrificing marriage, children and life. There is no moral dilemmas in the evolution of the character: the Shoemaker of the King, as in a beautiful piece of the film are appointed spies, dehumanizing his soul, her clothes with the Vertigo of the work and the loyalty to a cause always necessarily more important than their small desires and their small domestic life. The CIA was formed originally by fundamentalists of good social class, white, not necessarily Catholics, but cultured, aristocratic and saved to safeguard a dark principle of homeland that les has been inculcated from childhood, when they already principian the values for which then they will be recruited and placed at the service of the cause. De Niro Gets the finger in the wound, but it does not hurt. It contains. Prefers reasoning nature of the Shepherd, his status as invisible guide a herd unprotected before the emotional shortcomings of its mission, its amoral acceptance of a destination and the abandonment of everything that goes beyond the broad lines of this company. All those sewers of the State, significantly the true good Shepherd, they must contain hundreds of stories that De Niro would have been able to use to offer a colorful spectacle of film of spies and we have no doubt that vividly, but he opts for the emotional plane, and without giving up certain moments of acute thriller, gives the viewer a powerful portrait of a country, yours, although there is a fascinating comment Wilson makes an Italian-American (played by a great, as always, Joe Pesci) who attacks him with the idea that all marginal groups have something in their hearts: the Jews have the tradition; Blacks, music; the Italians, family. But what have Americans? And have to America... and a vast expanse of world subjected to his ideological and commercial dictation. There is even one scene crucial that, for Christmas, all clustered around the tree and the consensual happiness, some sing "You've got the whole world in your hands / you have the whole world in your hands", the classic piece of the american songbook, while Wilson and a Colonel departen with damped whispers about the fate of the world and what part should be moved so that the game continues.Ambiguous, grey, bland, the character of Damon, their records on screen, are perfect. They embuten with mastery in the suit ironing of the official Wilson, ranging from a corridor to another, occupying offices, traveling the world to end only, fulfilled duty and the sense of the world, despite his effort, does not turn as you do for any of his efforts and their expertise. The terseness of his staging is important for history: their classic encuadros, its slow visual jewelry, its fabulous setting. What is no longer perhaps not so convenient is history itself - here De Niro has one lower fault - which weakens due to excessive footage (167 minutes) and the ambitious of a number of interesting stories construction but they end abruptly and they not coagulate in the plot the film unit. Perhaps because of this it is not a masterpiece but only a good or very good film.De Niro, in this second RAID behind the camera, has given us a very brave, honest, classic film by the way that I understand some film of the years 40 and 50 obviaban any commercial concession and only allowed licenses that reincidieran in the film itself. Isn't this film now is brewing thinking the Viewer, what you want and how to give it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3756

JLO

La boda

muchocine

Winner of the Golden Lion at the Venice festival in that year, is a sign of good cinema, not inconsiderable in these times.

Mira Nair, Director of the multi and exquisite Salaam Bombay! 1988, brings us a film between fiction and reality about the life and story of a punjabi family - Los Velma - by five relations that are weaving without haste, within a typical family of the region with its costumbrismos and problems. Filmed in thirty days with consecrated actors both rookies, tries to capture the present poor of the India within a society strongly clinging to its roots in the past, both culturally and in his fierce religion.Infidelity, marriage by arrangement, statutory, the parent-child relationship and above all the love they are portrayed with credibility and realism, stories well, although something pasteurized in tone, is believed to be in this case but looks for Hollywood and its so attractive that all market influences it and is, in these parts also. With striking scenes by the alien and with all the colorful of Hindu culture, with an excellent soundtrack that surprises in a comedia-dramática that could define manners. The most salient are the characters well delineated, strong, being the high point and the nexus of family guy, played by Naseeruddin Shah, recently named best Indian actor. The Director uses tab the melancholy and the disenchantment of the streets of New Delhi (his hometown) and manages to portray her mixing admiration with a hint of compassion accompanied all of excellent photography. Small and large film at the same time, is no surprise in particular reviewing the Filmography of the Director. Winner of the Golden Lion at the Venice festival in that year, is a sign of good cinema, not inconsiderable in these times.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/7

Victor Trujillo

El internado

muchocine

Hodgepodge of terror French

Fuck that crappy of boarding school. The movie does not begin badly and the presentation of the main character, which is undoubtedly the orphanage, an impressive House in the countryside, is very precocious, full of nuances and with too much light for a film of this genre. The House scares at first sight and the courtyard surrounding nor falls short; they were the most important ingredient to make a good horror movie, but what they have missed. Surprised the good French production and surprised the beauty of the main protagonist, but not these. The script is a humbug, passes through several stages that range from more to less and ultimately ends bored. Be grateful that if that have not resorted to the sangraza and the various viscera to give "more afraid", a resource that is already seen but running in house of wax.The key scene of the boarding school is when it arrives from the lift to the white room. It is so predictable, resources are so basic that seems a calque of thousand films and at the point the final peak more than be scary, laugh. A pity because the boarding school began very well but in the end is long and boring.