Datasets:

SINAI

/

MCE-Corpus

like 0

Follow

Grupo de investigación en Sistemas Inteligentes de Acceso a la Información (SINAI) de la Universidad de Jaén 13

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2777

Kiko de España

Plan de Vuelo (Desaparecida)

muchocine

"Flight plan: missing" has the privilege of being the first film that qualify with the note "Fucking shit", in what will be a resource "chanante" which I will apply to infumables films that put me between the eyes now.

This movie, if he had shot ten or twelve years ago would have been a luxury vehicle for Stallone, Schwarzenegger or Seagal, but now the shift is of Jodie.Si the horrible film of Robert Schwentke had of prota, Bruce Willis or Harrison Ford, at least have action and among the passengers would have at least a dozen "henchmen", but now the shift is of Jodie.Da shame of others at times (the incident with the Arabs)(, which as well as being out of place it contradicts the plot, at the end it turns out that Jodie had no reason and therefore lost the papers), falls into the ridiculous (the applause from the crew) and ends with the patience of the Viewer, which far from empathize with Jodie, just wants someone to do her silence with a good kick in the mouth (I do not even think of salad of hosts that I would give if I am in that) (flight, her sweats me to it whether or not it is batty)."I am not going to summarize the argument, because last night I slept fatal and I think that the fault lies with this"masterpiece"of the zafiedad.""Flight plan: missing" has the privilege of being the first film that qualify with the note "Fucking shit", in what will be a resource "chanante" which I will apply to infumables films that put me between the eyes from now (and which is equivalent to 0, for purists) A phrase: "Only has six years." People do things morbid with girls aged six.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2076

Patri

La ciencia del sueño

muchocine

Michel Gondry shows that not all the merit of forget you me it was in the script of Kaufman that he also has an impressive inner world.

In this film Gondry teaches us the two worlds in which the protagonist lives: that of dreams and the real, mixing them with a clever mounting which causes that the Viewer is at many times, as confused as the protagonist, played by Gael Garcia Bernal, to which I did not see in this role, perhaps because I'm used to see him in dramas and more "serious" films (Babel)(Do, amores Perros, bad education?), Gondry has discovered his comic vein but I noticed that can be a much more versatile interpreter than I imagined.The director, Michel Gondry, writes his own script, proving their worth as an artist and as the author of film. For the first time not so has written Charlie Kaufman, who had worked with in his two previous films, Human Nature and forget about me. I expected much of the science of sleep and I was disappointed, though not to be at the height of the previous Gondry film; also has a history of love as the main axis of the story, but unlike in forget me, here do not see the end of this story but the beginning; fears of Stephane, the protagonist, and so great insecurity that has him causing strange dreams and nightmares that confuses with reality.Best thing about this film for me, is the dreams in the World immerses us and which at times reminds me of the surrealism of Dalí, almost I see in this film a work of art, when that city paper houses and cars of cardboard, this water cellophane and paper bird, I feel as if you were in front of a painting charged life with the charm of the stop motionwho left to use because of the digital effects.I think that it is better to see it in the original version (although it is always better), as in the original it is spoken in French and English and is important because it also helps to increase the confusion of the protagonist, and the dubbing are lost some important things.The science of sleep makes people laugh and makes you dream of impossible things. Michel Gondry shows that not all the merit of forget you me was in the Kaufman screenplay but he also has an impressive inner world, I hope to make us enjoy with movies like this for a long time.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4327

Jaime Martínez

Los amantes del círculo polar

muchocine

The history reads similarly of the right than vice versa, as well as the name of its protagonists. You catch in his visual and dreamlike poetry full of strength and mystery, enigmas and coincidences, love and hatred.

"Lovers of the Arctic Circle" is the Summit of Julio Medem, and one of the shocking and EMA film in the last 15 years of the modern Spanish film. Imposing and majestic in all its levels and moments.A hypnotic and dazzling love story that revolves around the coincidences that encounter the protagonists; that is the best way to define this film.The film, told in the form of chapters, where you enter at the beginning of each of these, the name of the character that refers the chapter (point to favor already for mounting).A from there, we will see from their particular point of view as the action (thus observe two different one same fact views). And the magic begins soon. It begins at the time the first name appears on the screen - Otto-. When another name reappears on the screen - Ana - continues. The story of Otto and Ana, the story of two boys, the story of two children with names capicúas, matching the name of the Basque filmmaker - Medem - also capicúa do we have here the first chance of the film?The history reads similarly of the right than vice versa, as well as the name of its protagonists. The circle begins to draw in the first minutes of footage, to end up closing it perfectly in the face at the end of the film. Storytelling fulfils a circle, ending where it begins.Divided into three distinct parts (child, adolescent, adult), Medem get you involucres in history since the beginning (if not do these lost, odiarás). He wants you to feel what they feel the characters. Plays with you and random, you wrapped in a magic halo which do not want to flee, nor never escape. You catch in his visual and dreamlike poetry full of strength and mystery, enigmas and coincidences, love and hatred.Otto, Anna and a coincidence of fate (a bad ball released), do they know. The same accident (a newspaper) will be that you separate them.Separated for years, after living one of the most beautiful experiences that can live in the life (find the love of your life and live every moment with that person), meet again. They meet again but in a place completely unknown, a hidden and very pure place in the world, away from everything and everyone.Personally, if had to choose between one of the three main parts of the history, I would be with the child. That innocence, those Virgin feelings yet undiscovered, that magic inherent in the environment.The chances that occur them in children are truly amazing, the dream by everyone at some point in our lives. A shot to a ball with poor marksmanship that sneaks through the wall of the school, a paper plane that will stop at the foot of Ana, the love story that arises between the parents following the note of the paper plane (excellent not reveal that you put each one to imagine their perfect love phrase).Although if I had to highlight a key scene in the chances of players, it would be that of the stage in the plaza mayor of Madrid. Truly, you put the willies thinking that they are side by side, even only with rotated were; simply stunning (only you are want to shout them to the two, who are just behind). But its fate does not want that, the circle which began to draw has end up where he started, and was not.In the role of Otto, we have a somewhat tense Martínez Fele - perhaps the least notable of the film-. With a face that does not vary in practically all the footage, I think that it is the only character that isn't at the height of which requires the film. The figure of Otto requires more than what Fele Martínez may bring. A deeper than the "thesis" character is, and seems that not end it to understand.Child and adolescent making his same role a few years further back are much more natural. Also comment that the child of Otto (Peru Medem) is son in life real director July Medem.Por other side, in the role of Anne, is an unbeatable Nawja Nimri - as always. His voice provides the perfect tone which requires the film. Harmonious and poetic, rounded (as the circle) to perfection his performance with his tone of voice, leisurely and relaxing.Nancho Novo, which repeats with Medem after "Red squirrel" and "Earth", is more than correct in his role as father of Otto. The truth is that it is a multi-purpose, fitting perfectly both comedy and drama actor. Unfortunately, not given the importance it deserves, and seems that it finishes does not fit into the national film scene.And Maru Valdivielso is also very believable in her role as mother of Ana. With Nancho Novo, are a wonderful couple that complements perfectly, giving more realism even if possible to the film.Perfectly built and structured the characters, and superbly directed by Medem, the set of players rounded up the movie to the level of genius.As regards the technical section of the film, highlight the work of photography and editing. While it is true that mounting is not entirely novel, because the reference use the voiceover and various flashbacks to narrate past actions, possess a concentric structure that is taking shape to pass the minutes, as well as the choice of telling history under the subjective views of the protagonists make the work of the director of mountinga sample of elegance and virtuosity rarely seen before - especially in Spain-.tanto the choice of landscapes, of the filters used in camera and post-production, playing with bluish and cold tones (especially at the end of film in Finland) are exquisite and as opposed to the ardent love that exudes the protagonist couple.In the sound section, highlight (again) the collaboration of the fantastic Alberto Iglesias with Medem. Working together since "Cows", comes an exquisite music to our senses in "Lovers of the Arctic Circle" which fits perfectly with the action that takes place in every moment, marking the tone and the pace during the viewing.In short, we have a great love story told from the particular point of view by Julio Medem, magical and melancholy touches at the same time, developed in an environment where the life of the two characters with capicúas names are intertwined. An atmosphere full of chance and coincidences, where the destination is the true protagonist and not always gives us happy situations. The destination has a double face, joy and sadness, smiles and tears, life and death.An excellent work of the Basque filmmaker, which adds to the already-known as "Medem universe". A work that reflects perfectly innate human feelings and transforms them into pure visual poetry. Only Medem knows how to do that; He is a master to do so. If you don't like Medem, if you don't understand his films, if you get bored in the room, better forget about this. For the rest, prepare yourselves to enjoy like never before. Not do a preconceived idea. Watch it with the Mint opened and cleared more than ever, knowing that you're seeing a world recounted and built by July Medem.Con all summarized in his favour, majestic in all senses, is a film that transforms into everything a forced reference in the Spanish film of the 1990s. A real masterpiece that could give only us Medem. Thanks July.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2755

Kiko de España

Hostel

muchocine

90 minutes to forget a little tristísimo world that surrounds us, full of hardships, injustices and disappointments, seeing what the Yankees of Slovakia laugh. And the rest of the world.

Eli Roth conducted in 2002 "Cabin fever", one of the surprises of the last intelligent horror film.On that occasion a large number of young people suffer unspeakable to death in a horrible way in a cottage in the middle of nowhere.Seen the success of mouth ear had, and turned into a cult movie, now comes with a little more money and sponsored by the infallible Quentin Tarantino with "Hostel", that I saw, that it was one of the most anticipated titles of the season, and in which a number (not so) Youth suffers unspeakable to do die? in a horrible way in the middle of nowhere. And the movie doesn't disappoint. Or if?The case is that it is not so violent as they paint ("Passion" still has the top in sadism, gore and torture is concerned in the cinema of terror? 21st century) but it is fun as it was the earlier work.Notice to Mariners: is the movie with more good aunts and tits and ass with Thong (and without it) there is on the Bulletin Board. The argument is the least (not so I will gut, but in the background is another one of "those", already as you will see) and the first act could pass through the imaginary "American Pie: study trip", which does not exist, but that if there would be something like.There is a cameo appearance by Takashi Miike, the most gross of the moment, and will that think young people who, with summer just around the corner, believe in the interrail, or as balls type.The makeup effects are the work of the great Greg Nicotero, which better than get any movie in which there is currao, almost 100, the mirais in IMDB and flipais.The music of Franco-Giacomo Carbone is not bad (and at times, especially in the end credits), reminds of "psychosis".The director not innova nor is inventing flat "never ever made", fashionable in film today, but thank you that he does not walk with rodeos (although again, is not so wild as it should, to see if there is a director´s cut chachi) and that show us about subnormal characters with brain of penis that really matters to us a damn what happens to them.With a third act a little absurd, since during the two others look forward to seeing the torture chambers and then, when it arrives, it is running (or this will be a success that you cagas?), you can enjoy 100% and is missing one a couple of laughs, something that is appreciated, as well as the end, where the Viewer, an accomplice of the matter and infected by the dominant dementia, becomes another "of those" already what you will see.In summary, 90 minutes to forget a little tristísimo world that surrounds us, full of hardships, injustices and disappointments, seeing what the Yankees of Slovakia laugh. And the rest of the world. Do not you miss to the Slovak enfants.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2717

Iñaki Bilbao

El ultimátum de Bourne

muchocine

Action, which be charisma thriller. Although it is fast-paced and packed with good action, it is not less true that it hardly nothing more than that.

Third and, for now, last installment of the adventures and misadventures of Jason Bourne, the agent of the CIA suffered from amnesia, it desperately to discover who is in reality.It is for my taste, I do not know if the best looking strict quality film, but the more alive, more agile, the more adrenalítica, with many sequences that remove the hiccups, intense and vertiginous. Perhaps they are too many, this could be his only, but important downside.And it is that, at the end and out, although it is fast-paced and is filled with good action, it is no less true that it hardly nothing more than that. And as we know that, for many blows, shots, explosions, and above all tremendous milks that will stick and they hit you while driving being chased by the "shooter" on duty, who suffers Bourne, can never with him, ending being little more or less than an immortal being.That, in my view, take away credibility or at least likelihood. And stripping emotion and suspense because you know that it will go away with (although go leaving honest corpses on the road, as well as multitude of criminals) and that, although he hit shots and numerous beatings of karate in the body (superb the fight with the "shooter" of Tangier), although magullado, will go away and as much a bit lame and disheveled. This, in the cinema is idem, very spectacular, but has that you can not see from a merely realistic point.Moreover, because exactly like the second installment, also directed by Greengrass. And is, his films, if they provide with perspective, showing that they are identical in the form. Same level, same way of filming, with those affected levels of St. Vitus dance. Come on, not to say that you betray himself in their do different? work.But, anyway, which leaves a good taste in mouth the movie if you like full tapes action rampant (and not very reflective) and we will be waiting (seems to be that for quite some time) for the fourth installment. I do not I care to wait long because honestly I am now a little empachado of the such Bourne, shooters, traitors and his friends.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/399

José Córdoba

La noche de los girasoles

muchocine

The script is very weak and falls into the trap of its structure that wants to be enigmatic and surprising and becomes obvious and boring.

Me too lazy Spanish cinema. I lose faith in him because of both as soon as a film that worth seeing and is a big surprise, but in general I don't like, so I have chosen Spanish films to see in movies with dropper. I was curious to see this film, I had read good things about it and I thought, well let's give him a chance. Unfortunately I made a bad choice.The night of the sunflowers is a rural thriller, perhaps that would be the more correct definition, although the word thriller is very large. The film, narrated in a non-linear manner, presents a same story told from the points of view of the various characters involved in it. A priori, an approach if well not original, at least different, but that ends up being the most serious problem of the film. Tape tells the visit to a people of a group of speleologists (led by Carmelo Gómez) to investigate a newly discovered cave and try to find in her paintings which can be achieved that the economy of the town increased considerably. At its exit of the cave occurs an event to mark their lives. The film begins well, although with a horrible picture, the narrative has some tension until that happens the traumatic fact, towards the half of the footage, and from there the movie dies, dying, slowly. The characters that players had been hitherto disappear to make way for two others, both civil guard, who end up being the protagonists of the story in the last stretch. A clear error, because it is really more important that does not have the history of the first protagonists. In addition to having all the tension and practically solve the story half of the footage, the rest does not matter, rather bored and makes you look at the clock.In its look at the rural Spain, to the disappearance of villages, the movie succeeds and is stimulating, but as a thriller fails. The script is very weak and falls into the trap of its structure that wants to be enigmatic and surprising and becomes obvious and boring. Actors, with the exception of Carmelo Gómez and Celso Bugallo, not give much Yes, really, aren't credible, even though they aren't the worst of the film. The address shows an alarming lack of pace, very conspicuous in its final stretch. The picture is frightening, full of noise, without contrast. The music repetitive and without force as director only uses it when nobody is talking about, not know what to do with it.In short, a mistake. Although rather a disappointment because the film in its initial section pointing to something better than just being at the end. A new failure of Spanish cinema, to see whether Alatriste improves the picture.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2287

Ramón Besonias

Zodiac

muchocine

Portrait of an obsession. Zodiac escapes from the genre of assassins and policemen, decanting without objections by offering an almost documentary film cold although of disturbing plot.

When one sees this film suspicion that one of the possible reasons that could have led to our exhibitors to delay its release in many theaters in Spain is that - despite the expected by a spectator bit informed, or simply confident in the effective but crematística motivation of those who carried out the promotional trailers - are not dealing with one of those products with intelligent murderer to the Lecter and even more clever police on his hunt. Nothing further of what gives us Zodiac, whose long but superbly mounted footage is engaged only in thirty or forty minutes initial describe? without sanguinolencia or sadismos Visual, and Yes with a leisurely serenity that worries and even puts the willies (that's premeditated sadism!)-the murders of the Zodiac, based on real events that took place in California in the late 1960s.Five victims, four Cryptograms, letters to the press, live revelations to television, more than thirty years of research, some suspect but no detainee. A cocktail which had been to juicy scripts in the face of the box office if they had focused on the point of view of the murderer, or the dialectic of the police after the track of a clever criminal. But no, Fincher decides to bet - as did, but in a darker tone, Seven - by a dash more serene, classical if possible, which is weaving unhurried (as own research describes) a plot dyed false leads and hopeful signs we soon returning to move from a truth never fully clarified, and that only believed to arrive who perseveres, but leave in the way their private lives and their health.Zodiac escapes from the genus of murderers and police, decanting without objections by offering an almost documentary film cold although disturbing plot (centered on the obsession with Graysmith and Toschi, and cirrótico Avery), which analyzes the puzzle that those few rare men (i.e. risky for what his contemporaries concerned) seek to desmadejar, despite its difficulty, to name an elusive assassin with pretensions of showman of terror or Einstein of the puzzles. This option of Fincher bored fans of the police more and less bizarre (Lt. Callahan included), but will delight anyone (including who writes) expected a cinema research Pakula or Frankenheimer-70s style. Incidentally, the very discreet and always correct David Shire signed the soundtrack for Zodiac (so far Fincher is trust of Shore), as as it did with all the President's men, or the conversation (Coppola, 1974).This narrative discretion and that emotional estrangement not removed the creator of Seven us again to shrink the stomach in these excellent scenes of the murders, extraordinarily planned in order to leave us without breath waiting for the (fatal) outcome. Despite the coldness of the research process posed by the film, the pace is maintained and compels us to seek with their characters if it really is or not who believe the Zodiac killer. Now we do not know who is brutal in their crimes (that already almost forget the hour and a half of footage), but by the pure obsession to close the film in a certainty that we consuele. As it is to be expected, both the reality and the fiction are in this case dark and more disappointing than it expected.On the other hand, note the exciting cinematic references that paid Zodiac. In fact, the same movie revolves around fiction (the wishes, to be precise) as a trigger for human actions. Fincher's recreates the noveladas research on the book of the insightful cartoonist (and boy scout) Robert Graysmith (Jake Gyllenhaal again embroidering the role of Platypus, after that gem called Donnie Darko). The Zodiac killer works of projectionist in a cinema and was impressed by the movie the evil Zaroff (Pichel and Schoedsack, 1932), looking for more late recognition media through the press and television. Toschi (content and credible Mark Ruffalo) police just serving as a Muse of the dirty Eastwood Callahan or Bullit McQueen (could be the pistolón?).Fincher is pessimistic. Humans seek ghosts that may not exist, and at the end we are victims of our own passions, as the Zodiac killer, as three detectives, as the irascible character of Brad Pitt in Seven, like me, like you.The best: ** how to shoot the murders. ** levels air ciudad.* the scene of the encounter with the (alleged) proyeccionista.* the scene of the murder frustrated of the mother and her baby with this terrifying elipsis.* that start with item Easy To Be Hard, Three Dog Night, and a city lights, almost optimistic, single-family and teenagers that listen to Donovan or roses Lynn Anderson ballads and his Rose Garden.* caricature of the naked Yoko Ono and Lennon in the drafting.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/61

Ivan Sainz-Pardo

Buenas noches y buena suerte

muchocine

Spectacular pestiño where the tension and dramatic rigor are conspicuous by their absence

Some I odiaran without delay to attack a movie of el guapo Clooney, some not understanding the liberal and critical message of the tape, and others for not knowing appreciate the taste of a movie shot in black and white in the classical style, or for not giving up before its current recognition in Hollywood. The tension and dramatic rigor of the film are conspicuous by their absence. The camera effectively tells the story in black and white, but isn't "Schindler's list" or a lot less and, in this, the cinematographic language and the Mise en scene do not pass of mediocre.The actors do good they can with a flat, tedious and predictable script. David Strathairm poses very serious all the time, with adequate sobriety. Clooney appears very elegant, very correctito and nothing else. And the history between Robert Downey Jr. and Patricia Clarkson is so unnoticed, which does not reach another something that to be absurd. Actors smoke, that Yes, much, that we know that in the classic Bogart film already remained very well and also to try to go against, what better that exalt the tobacco in a society in which currently points to kick the habit.Television can be a tool to educate or to evade. Television is easy to handle. Already, Yes, and what? Therefore, nothing more. Or a dare to really portray the witch hunt, or the era Mc Carthy, or risk to address one critical sincere, serious or interesting about nothing at all. "Good night and good luck" is a spectacular pestiño. Which sat in the cinema by my side, after the first twenty minutes, slept like a baby and then survived the long-awaited final plugging your mp3. I envied for this reason, although I decided to deal me in until the end, even if only to be able to write about it today here. What huge disappointment with a film of which expected much more. The best, without doubt, was that, thank God, the ordeal did not exceed the hour and a half.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2461

Rafa Delgado

Harry Potter y la orden del Fénix

muchocine

That could have been, taking advantage of the powerful argument of the book, the best film of the saga of Harry Potter has become a small bluff, with a considerably Orgasmic final Fireworks.

Harry Potter and the order of the Phoenix is the longest book in the saga of the young magician (893 pages, are not feat), but however, his film adaptation has the footage more short movies inspired by the mythology created by J.K. Rowling.Y note an egg.Takes a regular in almost everything: the screenplay by Michael Goldenberg (debutant in Harry Potter) is poorly adapted, and the mediocrilla direction of David Yates (who will direct the next film, Harry Potter and the half-blood Prince) doesn't help much. It is full of incomprehensible facilones and resources that can be confused that does not know in advance the story (if up to me I had confused!), such as the creation of Dumbledore's army, the discovery of the room where the E.D. practiced, and obtaining the worst memory of Snape Harry. In addition, the pace is a disaster.I am aware that in a film adaptation will have to change many things, but there are some rather vital details of the book for the plot here have ignored completely. or be included without explaining what they are, only so that fans of the book say "Oh, this!", but first see them the film will stay with the face of moniato.Therefore, that Harry Potter and the order of the Phoenix is the most short film of the saga film, taking into account that the book is the longest, it seems to me an error. The plot is not well defined, and has even half of half of half of the tension and the bad feeling that they had in the book: not feel at any time that something big is brewing within the magical world (at least until near the end).Now, the final act, the part of the Ministry of magic, is a joy, and fairly faithful to the book.Struggles between good and bad wizards is a very enjoyable visual delirium, although there are shots in which is not absolutely nothing, and the final between two of the greatest wizards, it is very well done; very electrifying.This final act and some other things that I liked a lot (Luna Lovegood, Dolores Umbridge, the cestrals, the twins Weasley, the first ten minutes, the new design of the death eaters.), give the approved justito, but very sweet and sour.That could have been, taking advantage of the powerful argument of the book, the best film of the saga of Harry Potter has become a small bluff, with a considerably Orgasmic final Fireworks.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1460

Nobody's perfect

Tristram Shandy

muchocine

Winterbottom uses as an excuse the adaptation of the novel Laurence Sterne to stop telling a story of the film within the film, which offers a parodic vision without detract from the credibility.

Who go to the cinema to see an adaptation of the famous (more in England than in our country) and funny novel of nine volumes the life and opinions of Tristram Shandy, will be a disappointment. The film is not, at least in the content, a faithful translation to the screen of the book? very difficult objective by its peculiar character, everything is said. However, yes we can affirm that Witerbottom has grasped and reflected, in a way, the essence of this text of the 18th. As you already did literary work in its time, the cinematographic supposed parody and experimentation of conventional narrative structures.The film starts telling the story of the book, until you reach a second part in which the action moves to the own set of filming of the movie. It is then when we hear "cut!" and live assist the ins and outs of a real film: rivalry between stakeholders, funding problems, romances between the template, script changes? The English director leaves the film and opens us a door to his shooting, printing to the scenes a sense of ironic humor that arouses laughter in the audience.In both parts of the film is Steve Coogan who leads the cast. The actor carries with nearly the entire weight of the film, great in its double role of Tristram Shandy and self-centered and competitive actor that gives life in the shooting. Coogan co-starring with Rob Brydon - both had worked with Winterbottom in 24th hour party - some scenes of rivalry that not can soar to the category of mourning, if anything ridiculous duel, precisely because of this spoof character. As ridiculous and hilarious are many of the reflected, although entirely realistic scenes.Winterbottom, whose heterogeneous filmography so far varies between the mainstream and the underground shows with this production his more independent facet. Tristram Shandy is an author who film without being round, nor the first to address the topic of the film within the film (have done before an end made in Hollywood, the game of Hollywoodo or Ed Wood, only to mention some recent) provides quite a few great moments of humor. Crazy humor, as the reality itself, which on this occasion is that of a shooting.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1966

Iñaki Bilbao

Spiderman 3

muchocine

Okay to spend a ratillo (a little long for what counts, the truth), but left quite indifferent. So that, as it ends, it gives a little as if there will be a fourth part...

Entertaining third part of the adventures of Spider-man 3, directed by Sam Raimi.y the least good of the three.I'm not saying that it is the worst by the consideo which is not bad. Of course, what is clear is that it isn't as bad as many critics and bloggers are commenting out there, is not even bad. Only that it is the least fortunate of the three for different reasons.The first is that the formula is exhausted. It shows in a script where the fortunate situations not abound, there are somewhat repetitive dialogue that do not contribute anything to the action and the employee rate is very irregular, the final result being a mere hobby, forgettable shortly see. In this sense, does not seem nothing to the brilliant second part of Spider-man, where the character is offered us in a fascinating manner in their duality super-héroe - normal person, with all your questions, desires and human pain.Here we again offer this duality, but already without this patina epic just emotion, Yes with humorous notes, some good achieved, others a both streams.And is the best of this film are scenes where humor makes presencia.sin to provide an the protagonist. For example, the very funny character embodied by the likeable actor fetish of the director, Bruce Campbell, in the role of the maître of the restaurant where that left the protagonist with his girlfriend, with the pupils asking in marriage.And also, the descacharrante moment in which the Secretary of the head of the protagonist sends acústico-vibratorias to your table shaking to do what his wife he has entrusted to not be nervous.With regard to the action scenes, so irregular, with a first confrontation between Spider-man and his friend, excessively long and embarullado ex-mejor, and others better, with the "sand man" in liza.In short, I do not think that it would be worthwhile talking much more of this film. Okay to spend a ratillo (a little long for what counts, the truth), but left quite indifferent. So that, as it ends, gives a little as if there will be a fourth part (only signed three Raimi) or not. This is perhaps the worst thing that can be said about it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1189

Rafa Ferrer

Bienvenido a casa

muchocine

We must advocate from time to time for this film, and the film "made in Spain" is certainly a very good proposal

I said some weeks ago one of the regular columnists of the free newspaper DNA, which see Spanish film is laughing with our humor and enjoy our miseries, so perhaps the last film of David Trueba has served to feel identified with this proposal, given that starting from several points in common of a server with the story raised on the screenone already has an opinion quite contrary to what I have read about it on the tape.Samuel and Eva have been together 8 years (like a server and its media naranja), raised a life together (idem), and although still not have ceased to be a few kids have to deal with problems so far not even knew independently (idem), she more settled, firmer, with his feet on the Earth, (idem) and he a fucking disastera dreamer who thinks that everything can be fixed tomorrow and continues making things when it was a more than tender teen must face now a destination that almost you is upon (idem), if that join you an authoritarian mother almost would have the story of my life brought to the big screen, but can always resort to the views expressed in Filmaffinity (excellent site to which I owe an apology) and assess whether you deserve or do not go to see her.Once I have given you "sheet" step to comment a bit on the film, David Trueba composed a comedy (with some drops of drama), based on his own experience and starring Pilar López De Ayala and Alejo Sauras, the latter is pigeonholing in her television role as "son of the Sunia" and is difficult to separate him from this image, meanwhile Pilar López de Ayala begins to be with permission of many othersone of the most beautiful (and popular) faces the Spanish film, his appearances in the film are full of unique moments, and being even the "Fuller" of the film, their interventions leave maybe the tape of Trueba.La film is littered with cameo appearances, and from Neus Asensi, passing through many of the friends of Trueba (even the dog of his brother Ferdinand)It shows the "buenrollo" in the realization of the same; the splendid Concha Velasco, that looks so pretty and glamorous as yesteryear would need to mention. (Also turns the same day as I).Finally, there is that from time to time to advocate for this film, and the film "made in Spain" is certainly a very good proposal.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3684

Javier Saz

Naturaleza muerta

muchocine

The environment is imposed, the beauty of the images, frames, camera, music and sound for a living and indispensable work, movements almost seems it breathe by itself.

There are films that seeing them will they catch inevitably, this is the case of "Naturaleza muerta" ('Sanxia haoren', 2006).There are films that after seeing them grow in memory and their images are rooted forever, this is the case of the extraordinary film directed by Jia Zhang-ke.Cercana to the best films of Roberto Rossellini by starting a documentary reality for a fiction, as in "Rome, city abiet" or "Germany, year zero", the environment, the stage always surpasses fiction. "Naturaleza muerta" is a beautiful workstrange, powerful, alive, sad and beautiful. Different readings that do not have a greater or lesser importance in total if not belonging and form part of a single unit of itself as a work.The search for a father of her daughter, the search for a wife of her husband, the search in a dead place, somewhere in the process of disappearance, one goes in search of her past, she to break definitively with his.As the unstoppable advance of the policy of the Chinese Government with the creation of the three Gorges Dam condemning entire neighbourhoods, (reordenadas) ripped people from their lives. destruction to progress? And the consequences? No longer the consequences following the destruction if not the consequences during the destruction. Fiction to show a untold reality. A pervertidamente Westernized and materialistic culture. UFOs appearing on the horizon and buildings that take off from the ground.Made in high definition video, "Naturaleza muerta" is structured in three parts for telling us two simultaneous but not converging stories. The environment is imposed, the beauty of the images, frames, camera, music and sound for a living and indispensable work, movements almost seems it breathe by itself. (4 +)

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3583

Sandra Ríos

Bee movie

muchocine

It is a tape I recommend see paying attention closely to the details of each scene, without worrying about losing its loose narrative structure.

"Dye" Comic movie, look inevitable knowing the background, was handled with a lovely sutiliza. The comedian takes his great talent to satirize the natural human behaviour, to believe the only holder of the goods of nature. The creative capacity of Seinfeld to devise and lead us to that imaginary world of bees, is very large. We are many people on several occasions we think or invent in our minds how they think different animals: ants, cats, dogs, etc and Seinfield, knew how to do this perfectly carried nearest reality that we know on this aspect: the film. In addition to this mode get satisfy the dream of those who tend to create this kind of stories but they are reserved to the purely personal level. Really managed to capture in images as they believe the bees, which make the bees as they feel and see us as. Believing as bees, think like bees was a fundamental premise in the story that was accomplished fully.But becomes inevitable to compare it with the extraordinary film of Pixar, stiff competition from DreamWorks, "Ratatouille" (here read the criticism), which imposed a high point in the animation genre and since that I saw her anticipated that hardly could be achieved, at least for this year, something that overcame her such as Ratatouille masterfully combines technique with history, something lack you a Bee Movie. History of A bee stays on plot and story refers, because they have in a way so carefree that lost hilarity and cohesion, is easy to see how an event becomes another subtracting important explanations. What is more, I could even find a great physicist resemblance between the female cartoon characters of both tapes that caused me much curiosity and acumen. Do as I also wondered: will be that we will be taking the first steps to the stage where we will create true animated actresses? And I am not referring to the already created as Peggy, Deysi, etc. As to this I leave the photos so judge for yourself, also crazy that sounds everything is possible. Bee Movie has managed to raise after its premiere in United States on 2 November and today in various countries, a total of $ 137 million; While Ratatouille approached the 610 million, because something will be.History of a bee at the end I was having more emotion and charisma to narrate the plot and that is why wasn't me so appealing and complete, but probably will be part of the 3 finalists to compete award Oscar in this category thanks to its technical invoice. It is a tape I recommend see paying attention closely the details of every scene without worrying about losing its loose narrative structure.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2610

Bloody Will

Planet Terror

muchocine

This hour and a half of pure and simple savagery deserves a couple of mixed drinks accompanied by that friend who has all the ballots to finish in Carabanchel.

I must begin by saying that give an opinion of this film in the way that premiered in Spain is quite difficult. The botched the Weinstein brothers and the distributor have committed to split in two a product like?Do Grindhouse?, who had his grace to pass by double terror program, has finished with the sense that had to attend a festival of gore and guts that Robert Rodriguez and Tarantino had prepared for their unconditional.As always, the box office ends up being the main objective of all, and with the collapse of this invention in American theaters have thought about money we the Europeans. Will it pay in the future, that certainly outweigh.?Does Planet Terror?, as independent film, is a product of B series conceived from the outset to be so, without more script to go to maim and blowing his cast and finish through you the hand the face if you has spilled something. The story is so bad that it is made on purpose, actions are so bad that they are made to order. The special effects are so crude that they are made to order and blood is so false that it has been purchased in bulk in a whole hundred. With all that is fun for the most part, irreverent, and though it makes heavy towards the Middle, ends with an apotheosis end of fiestas, all very thing Rodriguez.A this point I do not know if I liked to be a hodgepodge of volume and spine, but it has all the ballots to be the most unbearable summer movie for a good number of unsuspecting viewers who do not know very well where they get and believe that they will see a few Undead to the Romero.Claro, the spark of all was in insert with fake trailers and compare it with the later?Death Proof? Tarantino. He had to see her knowing that we we have the two directors more personal in the Yankee picture: do as they please and as they want, and they can afford licences wishing. Do do with this scam split in two, trailers are still there, but seem to be stuck with a shoehorn, and when it ends the film you have that feeling that? I see cold at home for this?. ?Planet Terror? recover to this Robert Rodriguez from?Do open at dawn? and which had nothing to do with the most meticulous aesthetics of?No City?, but intended to give all the situations a point of absolute nonsense and an air of bad 1970s footage becomes vulgar when it has pulled out of context, and the context really, were the three hours of?Grindhouse?.It is the second film of the zombie genre that we are this summer (previously,? do 28 weeks later?), but the mutant zombies of Rodriguez in anything having to do with the rest. In addition to crumble very rapidly, the troperías committed by them are vomitivas, (care to Tarantino scene in the elevator) and with that I think that many people will be close to the cinema to see her. In this story there are no moral or lesson to be learned in life, only one dead after another. Do some situations, as I said before, make no sense, but do not need it because everything is a tribute to the bad films gave us the? exploitation? 70. The style is the of?Cleopatra Jones? and the bad ostia is Rodriguez.Los actors have done what they had to do: stop killing. They are basically stereotypes which puebla this premeditated slaughter, that we have the bad cabr ** (Josh Brolin), the military CA ^ ** (a spectacular Bruce Willis), the hero cool of the story (Freddy Rodriguez), the companion of the cool (Naveen Andrews) and the girl stripper and cale ** survives to everything, even to an amputation and its subsequent replacement by a submachine gun. Then there are las tontas which are falling like flies, including my hated Fergie, singer of?Black Eyed Peas? and seen in?Poseidon?. Do the script is a calamity that lines of dialogue are taken from the compendium of? more phrases than manidas? in the history of the cinema. It does not matter much, because the important thing is not what they say, but what it takes to open the mouth before they cut them any limb.Do continue talking about the film would finish telling the key scenes of the film and giving you your point, so I will finish by saying that?Planet Terror? It is a bad film of gore made wanting to be bad. There is an absurd accident and an aunt that triggered by his leg, do you think that we should take seriously something?. Al gore is abundant and everything put in this film, so if you don't like al gore did not go to see her because her you pondréis green, and knew what was in the jar. To this it must add all the violence that Rodriguez is a specialist mixed with drugs and sex (scene interruptus). If you are sitting in the armchair and start to lift eyebrows and turning the eyes do that c ** expected this?.Without showing my preference for a distillery or another, this hour and a half of pure and simple savagery deserves a couple of mixed drinks accompanied by that friend who has all the ballots to finish in Carabanchel.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/476

Nico

Clerks 2

muchocine

Bob, Dante and Randal created the most endearing family from the Adams.

Try talking about Clerks, or the film Kevin Smith in general, without recourse to the word "freak" is quite difficult but necessary. The term itself, at least as I handling it, implies that the person in question need not be aware of their rarities. For example, Pilar López de Ayala in Alatriste is a freak because it acts as if it were a remote control by a UFO and I doubt very much that is aware of the strangeness of his behavior. Instead, that two people of 30 years decide to work in a fast food chain and spend the day discussing life (trilogy of Star Wars front trilogy of the Lord of the rings) not only it seems to me freak but is one of the more "healthy" decisions that can be taken.Ignoring the dialogues (which is not that they are good or bad: are real) and the Visual scketchs (the tribute of the silence of the Lambs is brutal) Kevin Smith film sticks out of the media because at no time arises that his characters are a few immature, a few outcasts, or some memos. We would appreciate that, for once, the characters do not realize the absurdity of their way of life and at the end of the film to achieve its long-awaited "maturity". In Clerks 2 opposite: they reaffirm their positions and Jay, Bob, Dante and Randal created the most endearing family from the Adams. That's called being honest with oneself and the truth makes you leave the film ready to vomit to any fan of the Lord of the rings. It is a choice: can be a whiner as Tim "oh, I'm weird, I suffer by this and all my characters suffer the same as I" Burton or, directly, you can assume what you are and live happily in your world. And if someone you scratch you don't have go to do a bit of karting. I wish I had more people like Kevin Smith in the world.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2665

Dragon negro

Los 4 Fantásticos y Silver Surfer

muchocine

I hope that there is a third party dispatch of a director East and the team kick screenwriter and deal with the franchise anyone who knows us to give a more adult film and a better than that seen so far show.

Say that this sequel is better that its predecessor would tell a lot, because the truth is that it moves within the same patterns, affects the same failures and shortcomings and the only thing that improves are special, something most successful due to its greater budget effects. Despite the fact that its director Tim Story promised us that this second part was going to be much better, the truth is that had been a loose continuation of one already alone loose part.Our 4 protagonists move for invalid reasons, something that in the first part was more defined, and they militate here just to have stupid conversations with children's dialogues, Johnny Storm is still the same cool pools to before and in this sequel decides to conquer a cold soldier of the army that always gives you pumpkins until that discover that he also has its little heart, and are just falling in love with one of the many nonsense script redundant, the thing still in his shabby polispan costume and with their tantrums constant with Johnny that do not have any kind of grace already, Sue Richards makes more vase woman than anything else, and lives more worried about her wedding to save the world, you are superheroine, and eventually Reed Richards that seems to pass it better manufacturing junk and researching that you getting in bed with his wife, which is already a crime with the woman who has to this if he was concerned more save the world your wedding and is hiding from his wife, that everytime catches it investigating has a crisis of couple. A few characters who are a compendium of clichés very worn-out and boring and totally devoid of any interest.But the problem is not just that the characters are poorly defined and interpreted and flat profile, is the approach and development of the film also is plain and simple, lacks it pace and action, the family seem to a group of little than ever you get to pretend that they are able to save the world or anything by many powers that have and if add you the hair tomadura having to a Galactus in the final scene depicted as a giant hurricane, the result is much lower than expected and the feeling that, in other hands, the film would have given much more than if.I hope that if there is a third part dispatch of a director East and the team kick screenwriter and deal with the franchise anyone who knows us to give a more adult film and a better than that seen show up now, I think that the fantastic four deserve.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1935

Iñaki Bilbao

El hombre de Rio (L'homme de Rio)

muchocine

Enjoyable adventure film, very dynamic. In addition, there are beautiful landscapes, as it corresponds to the beautiful city of Rio de Janeiro, and other beautiful locations. A very enjoyable movie.

"An adventurer and a woman try to find a treasure hidden somewhere in the Brazil." "They are not the only ones who want to achieve and so are ready to everything."Very entertaining tape of action-adventure, one of the first of this type later starred the great Jean Paul Belmondo in abundant quantities. Thereby lost a great dramatic actor (which it was, as it demonstrated more than once), although viewers spend it pump with spectacular feats. This before us is enjoyable while it looks, and later forgettable, but it contains a frenetic pace that makes you pass it superbly.In addition, there are beautiful landscapes, as it corresponds to the beautiful city of Rio de Janeiro, and other beautiful locations. A very enjoyable movie.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2521

JLO

Los 4 Fantásticos y Silver Surfer

muchocine

The first was a kind of movie kitsch, playful and cheerful, amounting to an approved scraping by its naivety, rhythm and grace as a catchy pop song by radio. This new shows of the Fantastic 4 Silver Surfer, or becomes only a good guitar riff.

The expectation really wasn't much. The first was a kind of movie kitsch, playful and cheerful, amounting to an approved scraping by its naivety, rhythm and grace as a catchy pop song by radio. This new shows of the Fantastic 4 Silver Surfer, or becomes only a good guitar riff.Another scene of dance at the beginning (as in the ill-fated Spiderman 3, seems that dances are not going with the superheroes) and an anticlimática intro on the Reed-Sue relationship, anticipated us that we are facing a problem of rhythm and script.The same cast class B of the first part, does what it can with a ñoño script, which leaves no room for big surprises. In the spirit of an episode of any series of science fiction in the 1970s. Too little compared with the existential problems (and more rich) colleagues comiqueros like Batman and the same as artificial as clear contact lenses Spiderman.Todo and the blond hair from Jessica Alba, as Julian McMahon as the Dr.Doom (again this bad) and the eternal Stan Lee cameo in project marvelita.Marvel has a gallery of great characters untapped in the film, all of excellent personality: Punisher, Daredevil, Ghost Ryder, Elektra, Hulk, these same Fantastic 4 and now Silver Surfer. Films that disappoint by their lack of depth in the psyche of the heroes.If not for Raimi and his Spider-man, Blade 2, and some X-Men, Marvel would already be up. Although we are not naive and know what sends here is the box office and not the film quality.If it were not for the digital Silver Surfer (character powerful if any) we would be talking about an unhappy film. But Silver is. Even if it is only that.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2400

Jose Contreras

28 semanas después

muchocine

If the public has not applauded it is not the fault of the director, is that he was not advised that in addition to see zombies carníboros was going to need a tissue.

"28 days later" Danny Boyle was confesa or not, a film of zombies. The terror consisted of the same characters, which both ansíabamos they escape turned into zombies and suddenly wanted to be destroyed; It was that human feelings, compassion was a weakness, and the army, who had to save the healthy, was a danger.The zombies of Boyle put to test our Christian sensitivity. In his world, only survived the insensitive. Fresnadillo did not want to go further, as, indeed, we were waiting for. He wanted to humanize their monsters, and it has taken a step backwards. The protagonist falls prey to rabies and start hitting the walls. He is no longer with us, it is one of them, but Interestingly, the camera follows him. It is a subjective camera. Do you want Fresnadillo we identify with the patient? Not you quit? Boyle had not made that mistake.The innocents of this version are so afraid of zombies of the army. When the time comes, the soldiers receive the order to kill the human. Fresnadillo points to the objectification of a part of society, of the army, which is so easy to make guilty of anything. But the message of Boyle was much deeper because it pointed to the very essence of the human being. The family of the protagonist carries a genetic variant that is completely consistent surprises at the end, both the humanitarian as the tragedy. Fresnadillo has wanted to put into question the bleak message of survival over the love of neighbor and has wanted to sneak a positive message, as a choir of angels in the middle of the Texas Chainsaw Massacre. If the public has not applauded it is not the fault of the director, is that he was not advised that in addition to see zombies carníboros was going to need a tissue.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2170

Jeremy Fox

Descubriendo a los Robinsons

muchocine

A film that will not go down in history except as a stepping stone in the recovery of the Disney label.

It is curious that the best commercial time of animated cinema has coincided with the decline of the Disney, to the extent that it has been abandoned, by now, 2D traditional animation to embark in the competitive world of 3D animation.His first attempt was the flojísima "Chicken Little" and now comes the second: "Discovering a los Robinsons" (Meet the Robinsons), directed by Stephen j. Anderson. "The improvement is obvious.""Discovering the Robinsons" it tells the story of Lewis, a smart inventor of twelve years whose last and most ambitious project is the memory scanner, a machine that will help you to find his biological mother and to have a family again. Unfortunately, the evil Bowler Hat Guy steals your invention. But Lewis does not lose hope and meets a mysterious boy named Wilbur Robinson, proposed to our bewildered hero a trip in time to spend a day with Wilbur's eccentric family?The biggest problem of the film is that it offers nothing new and even reminds, at times, "Jimmy Neutron". To say in its favour, in reality, it is not intended to offer anything new. Only its makers claim is the do have a fun time to the audience. And you could say they get, although without enthusiasm.And entertaining because the film has two good virtues. The first of them is the proper rhythm, the narrative fluidity, which leads adventure in adventure without that transitions or the moments of rest seem forced.The second virtue, which possibly will be most remembered by the public at the end of the projection, is its villain. The villain of the function is a character really well built and a beautiful tribute to the wonderful Jack Lemmon in "The race of the century" or Pierre Nodoyuna of "Wacky" (clearly inspired by him). A character that, bad and stupid, makes nice and even endearing.No much more to comment on the film. Entertainment and a good villain. I think two elements are more than enough to see a film that will not go down in history except as a stepping stone in recovery (that will come) the label Disney. final evaluation of moonfleet.es: 5.5 out of 10.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3999

Sandavito

La boda de Tuya

muchocine

A sublime masterpiece based on real facts, half way between fiction and documentary.

Almost three months ago came to us a small great masterpiece in the form of Chinese drama: the wedding of yours. Brand new winner of the Golden bear in the 57 Edition of the Berlin Festival, reels the penalties of an average family in the huge and arid steppe North of China.Precedida Mongolian for its international success, this film which, otherwise, would be minority, seems to have garnered great success in theatres, with full after three months in poster. It is no wonder, since yours, embodied by the actress Nan Yu, whose latest work we'll see will be Speed Racer, the Wachowski brothers, and that has been winning awards since 2001, really moves. A sincere woman who is overwhelmed by the circumstances, have to take care of his family, especially her husband that was disabled in an accident, receives the news if still pastoring his flock and loading weight it can end as invalid as he. It is at the time when you should take the most difficult of his life decision: divorcing husband and find another man willing to load with her family and keep them all.That point of rotation so alien to our society, the investment of the values of the pyramid of Maslow accepted so easily (are the own husband and sister-in-law who encourages her search to another) one of the many elements that make the film so suggestive and attractive. It's have a life and a situation without artifice, without dramatismos, with this resignation and acceptance of who knows that if does not find another husband, or still not digging the pit until you find water, he will inevitably die. And still go ahead without shedding a tear. A plot and film reminiscent of the films of Zhang Yimou before that he fell into the megalomania of his latest productions, more in line with, for example, one less, or the long road home.The wedding of yours has a classic scheme of five acts and a simple and effective realization with a camera who exercises more than witness the omniscient observer which we have so used the current film scene. Wang Quan'an manages to convey the desolation of the enormous landscapes and subjects at the same time as delicate as polyandry or a kind of marriage prostitution for survival, and that far from the Happy Ending and more European, American reminds us that reality always surpasses fiction, and that after the ate partridges life goes on, and does not always have to be for good (as masterfully tells William Goldman in his novel the Princess Bride).An elegant atmosphere and truly nearby characters, many of which interpret real surviving steppe Mongol, which adds realism, flavored with a soundtrack precocious, those both yearn lately in the film, which not only does not hinder, that enrich the whole, confirmed the synergy to create a film that nobody should miss, a sublime masterpiece based on real facts, half way between fiction and documentary.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1981

JLO

El aviador

muchocine

With the pedigree that supports Scorsese in their espaldasor is difficult not to compare and judge it. Only you can add that the Aviator, is another example that we have one of the great film.

Howard Hughes, Aviator/director/entrepreneur eccentric and insane megalomania, could not find a better vehicle than a biopic done by another passionate as Martin Scorsese today. Also shares it the same excess of Hughes director in the almost three-hour, lavish scenarios, and arduous follow-up during twenty years of character and its rare psyche. Another success is focusing almost exclusively on his facet of Aviator rather than the obvious as a filmmaker.It is not true as it is judged, the be a film too impersonal. Throughout his extensive footage, note the hand of its director, both in him editing as in the treatment of color at different stages, with the inevitable grand scenes in his filmography.The Aviator is Scorsese his staff Ed Wood. The affection shown by its "creature", this conscious tribute car, makes it akin to the affection shown by Tim Burton in this film with his also alter ego. Howard Hughes during the Golden Hollywood, was a key figure both by his facet as director (the angels of hell, the outlaw), producer (Scarface) and the largest aviation pioneer. His obsessive disorder, the visceral fear of germs, and relations with its famous women, did the rest to be attractive to Martin.Su verbosity and violence, New York Gangsters visible flaws, not repeated them here Scorsese. The Aviator is stronger than its predecessor. If they are the fact of telling with passion - and stubbornness - American history. Di Caprio continues to pursue his acting growth, even if this is not the best of his career, but more than meets. It seems to stay halfway with regard to the interpretation of the old age of Hughes, problem of his eternal face of nene not aging or with the scruff and a thick beard. Katherine Hepburn, found in the skin, voice, claw and up the affectation of Cate Blanchett, a living synonym. The end is revealed as a debtor of Citizen Kane scene. Seems that our mothers and their memories, are a hard to beat in our psyche hurdle and could even replace the final phrase of the future, with the small and great word Rosebud.Con the pedigree that supports Scorsese on their backs (Taxi driver, raging bull, the last temptation of Christ, Casino) is difficult not to compare and judge it. Only you can add that the Aviator, is another example that we have one of the great film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/52

Tito Chinchan

Buenas noches y buena suerte

muchocine

George Clooney goes strong in the world of the direction, hopefully that does not stumble

Buff, hairs and hooks I still have after seeing the film. I can only say Viva Edward Murrow and the mother that bore! Wow, that peliculón.The film is set in the years 50 Americans, when Senator Josph McCarthy devoted his life to the famous "witch hunt", i.e. to pursue Communists for the homeland. On CBS, a presenter of a well-known television program decides that already okay so many abused by this man and welcomed by their bosses, plant you face McCarthy connect on the table (abuses). He and his team embark on an epic battle against the Senator that is easily extrapolated to any time in the history of mankind. And I am not counting more, that this must be seen.Fuck that peliculón, that exciting. For starters it is recorded in black and white, which helps you quickly get you into environment. The first minute is a little boring (lyrics) but from there, it is vibrating. You spend the entire film to suffer like a fool for the good of Murrow and his team, so the atmosphere that creates, plated. The picture is very good, with very accurate levels. And the devastating argument. Since then, a lesson of courage in an age in which the brave was them cut head. To highlight the excellent performance of the character that embodies to Murrow. Bad film and the truth is that I don't see you anything that you want to tell you.In short, a peliculón of scandal. But wins the Oscar is that scholars have no idea I (that I have seen almost all). If it would have shouted "Libeeeeertaaaaaaaad" at the end I die of éxtais.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4379

Cecil B. Demente

Los monstruos del terror

muchocine

One of the worst pastiches of monsters that have been ever filmed. The only thing that saves him from the burning is that camp tone and naive that is and that drops sympathetic.

The planet Ummo has counted, so his countrymen sent to earth the doctor Odo Varnoff evil with a mission to kill humanity and leave via free to move. As human beings are a superstitious and cowardly race, these squatters space plan is to relive the classic monsters of the films of the Universal and with your help, to dominate the world. So they cast hand of "Anthologie of the Monsters", an entertaining guide tombs and secret Crypts indicating the whereabouts of Dracula, the Wolf Man, the Mummy, the Golem and Frankenstein's monster. Mad doctor full time can be tiring, so the such Varnoff will take advantage of the night to do some sightseeing and purple watching the WTF are the land, something that will make you decide to form an army of massive slave at your service. This is a Spanish, German and Italian co-production, and asked me I; do for what the hell come together so many countries if this has less budget than the video for my communion? The film was shot in six days by three different directors, the Dracula name never appears in the film for not having to pay copyright, and the same goes for Frankenstein, which makeup the name and call it the monster of Faransan, but the worst part is the Golem, which at the end or leaves. The Wolf Man, as it could not be otherwise, is portrayed by Paul Naschy in one of his many incarnations of Waldemar Daninsky. As curiosity, say that the character of Waldemar has appeared in more than ten movies with different origins and motivations, and in different times and situations, but always keeping the face of Naschy and the curse of Lycanthropy. Returning to the film, the hyphen is awkward and full of artifice and pompous dialogues which actors recited as who reads the letter at a restaurant, the make-up and effects are crappy and ridiculous, which is greatly noted that Frankenstein faltering step and entrecerrados eyes that seems a drunk people, and that Mummy with aspect of Chinese that have chopped the bees. This may be, in short, one of the worst pastiches of monsters that have been ever filmed, and the only thing that saves him from the burning is that camp tone and naive that is and that drops sympathetic. The phrase: "we'll call her Ilanka, it will be the first of a group of beautiful women who blindly obey my orders."

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1257

Yojimbo

Cache Escondido

muchocine

Highly recommended to remove some cobwebs too correct movie of which we only tells that we see when paladeamos movies like this.

Michael Haneke, since it made Funny Games became one of the European Directors that I follow with more interest and this film became my favorite horror film. With this curriculum I cannot think another thing go to see his new film this Saturday at the mythical Alphaville. Missing 5 minutes for the meeting and my friends of 8 and a half had not opened yet, so I preferred to pay 6 euros and then tell the movie.Said and done. The room was 50 per cent of its capacity, something which surprised me pleasantly. And there only people with glasses of pasta. It begins the film and does so with a level that if you use any other director could tempt the instant insult. It is a fixed plane. The opening credits appear as who writes a post like this on your computer (of the most original I've seen: fast, simple and fulfilling his mission). And then it already begins the feast Haneke.Daniel Auteuil and Juliette Binoche, two heavyweights of the European cinema, pull their best weapons to please Haneke and the viewer in a new story of remorse and fear of floating in the air and can be reproduced on VHS (and not as in "The Ring"). What would you do if you receive tapes recorded from the outside of your House and teach you how sales and enter it, how to upload to the car, etc?? Is that a threat? And what is worse who does that? The uncertainty can go us mad.They say that fear comes from what is not known, but perhaps we should be afraid of what you are trying to confirm or know. Our mechanisms to rummage in our past and look for a logic perfectly manageable can have dire consequences (seems to be a phrase for the great Douglas Hal, but it has its intricacies) an ideal film for those who know that Haneke has no limits. An ideal film for those who want to be surprised by the lack of constraints of the films that end well. Or simply ending.Highly recommended to remove some cobwebs too correct movie of which we only tells that we see when paladeamos movies like this.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/868

Txapulin

El perfume

muchocine

I was not disappointed at all, but it left me with the question of what else would have brought me this film if I had not read the book.

I came to this movie with two completely personal problems. First, I have just read me the book and second, that the movie was filmed in the city where I was born (Barcelona) and where I live (Girona). I moved the movie compared to the book and looking for locations, respectively, and thus there is no who enters fully into the movie.Saving these problems, that the movie does not have any blame, the film is very good. As adaptation is sufficiently faithful to the book, and the few changes, I think that they are good choices. Shortens the part where Jean-Baptiste Grenouille, the protagonist, he spends years of solitude in a cave in a mountain, it is accentuated his murderous nature and aspects strictly film, as the performances, music, photography and the atmosphere, are excellent. Perhaps failure in abuse of the Narrator, who is too present, and explains things for those who have read the book are obvious and that perhaps they would be better only insinuadas.Total, that to be a long-awaited movie I was not disappointed at all, but I left with the question of what else would have brought me this film if I had not read the book and if it had been filmed in places that I knew not.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2971

José A. Peig

Jungla de cristal 3: La venganza

muchocine

A tape fun at times, well done, but lacks dramatic force and real ingenuity that goes beyond efectistas beats in a script full of tacos and vulgar claims for little demanding audiences.

The hallmark of Die Hard was John McClane, hero improvised in unexpected situations. The precedents were still the same idea, and in particular the second already was a bland repetition and the beast of the masterpiece of John McCtiernan. It had its logic rescue the hero and placing it in new circumstances. This time no longer in place and wrong time, but in his city together with the colleagues and weekend hangovers. As always, McClane a normal type, but the plot, in this case, does not seem intended for the character in question, and indeed, the screenplay for this film suffered several modifications due to the theft of ideas towards other similar productions. The home is quite overwhelming, someone claimed the presence of McClane while blackmailing by placing bombs. Soon comes in Zeus, character played by Samuel l. Jackson, sour character and an acid sense of humor that will collide against the no less deadpan vehemence of John McClane. Simon says.A macabre guessing game that allows to establish a triple chemistry between the duo McClane-Zeus and the cynical coldness of Simon (Jeremy Irons). In this area, say the script presents a wit and a fluidity that, at least, it works pretty well in the case of an action film encorsetado film genre that hardly can offer us something creative or worthwhile from an aesthetic and intellectual perspective.In reality, little offers the film apart from the dramatic scenes and the correct implementation of McCtiernan, which manages to keep pace in a story that extends for too many minutes to tell us a story too simple and worthy of any typical pigswill gender (a story suitable for filming a bad sequel to the "Lethal weapon" series). Dialogues are reduced to things as ".the of I do not touch the balls you put lightning in the ass" or "I'll put the truck in the ass" or "am like the duracell muñequito.". Be that as it may, it seems that these expressions have penetrated in an important sector of the spectators, and described as "ingenious script" to what is nothing to be funny in an area of serie B, and in case of necessity of vacuous entertainment for not squeezing the fontanel. History, as we have said, simple, predictable, repeated the idea of the first jungle. Like Hans Grubber, Simon feigns psychotic ideals to mislead and cover up a robbery. The plot then divided the action in different sub-actions which are stretched and often lose intensity due to excess of superfluous details, and that is the main problem of the film; a poorly structured script - by what have too you and what lacks - posed various actions (the persecution of McClane on the one hand, that of Zeus on the other, the theft of the federal Reserve Bank of New York, and school under threat of bomb) without articulate them in a dramatic all cohesive. Precisely, lacks it dramatic incentives that will do justice to the vicissitudes of McClane, which in its two precedents were always involved a commendable dramatic tension. Or think a product worthy of Steven Seagal or Stallone more humanized and portrayed by Bruce sum Willis.En hero, tape fun at times, well done, but there is a lack of dramatic force and real ingenuity that goes beyond efectistas beats in a script full of tacos and vulgar claims for little demanding audiences.John McClane in the first Die Hard of McCtiernan meant to raise a genus with a tendency towards mediocrity as it is that of action cinema, to the epic and Crafts category. McCtiernan returned to take the lead and brought us the harsh reality. As already discussed, Die Hard is a film miracle, and the genre of action - twenty years later - still expecting a response that will do him justice. Because we insist, masterpieces which have slum to a specific genre have not to be revered and back to them, but to get closer to them or, in the best of chances, be overcome.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1023

Silvia Giner

Infiltrados

muchocine

Do set at a time?Mafia? the old Boston, infiltrators strengthens on our screens with considerable success. One of the best films of this unfortunate? cinematically? talking about 2006.

The powerful Warner Bros., brings us a talented hand of maestro Scorsese remake (spare all that can be said of this man, that the foundations of cinema is tottering with only mentioning his name already) and with a sensational cast: Leonardo DiCaprio, Matt Damon, Jack Nicholson and Alec Baldwin. With both renowned of medium was frankly difficult shit her.Set in a "Mafia" of the old Boston time, infiltrators strengthens on our screens with considerable success. One of the best films of this unfortunate "cinematically" speaking 2006.El that was handsome Hollywood (Dicaprio) child is a versatile, demonstrating that if it is a star it is not only because of his physique, something which I'm deeply glad that this guy is a crack of the interpretation acting him despite who gets upset. Accompanied by a sensational Nicholson and Damon to rise to the occasion, create an exciting mafia triangle.In this film, the script takes prominence, thanks to William Monahan (the Kingdom of heaven). The verbiage that defend the characters comes to complicated to the extent that you have to take a breath to continue the dialogue (in VOS).Little or nothing is against infiltrators. Highly recommended even if you do not like the mafia film, it is worth seeing her and live this tension which was created and is maintained throughout the plot.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3913

Andrés Pons

30 días de oscuridad

muchocine

In short a typical film of action and horror that is at least bearable by their superb technical effects, even if you have to load with a few expressionless protagonists.

The great graphic novel written by STEVE NILES and illustrated by BEN TEMPLESMITH. In those moments where that kind of illustrations at the maximum peak of popularity her only film premiere could be a matter of time.DAVID SLADE that comes from success with his opera prima HARD CANDY, the macabre game where the hood ate the Wolf is responsible for carrying out a less risky production to be given a succulent box office.The cast already leaves me cold with the bland JOSH HARTNETT "SIN CITY, THE FACULTY" and the no less mediocre MELISSA GEORGE seen recently in tourists.Two pretty faces that certainly do not represent nowhere near some action heroes faced a horde of blood thirsty monsters.Unless the director has talent to wrap the environment on an unhealthy picture accompanied by good makeup effects and special that puts you in an entertaining plot.Is to thank the nothing concealed brutality of vampires, better forget about the referent romantic of these creatures because these only have desire to kill.Anyway the final part is fully topical with an ending modelled to the bucket 2 that the Lord of the bull you should not minimum grace.In short a typical film of action and horror that is at least bearable by their superb technical effects even if you have to load with a few expressionless protagonists.Highlight that he is responsible for the production the popular author of infernal possession or Spider-man SAM RAIMI.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/411

José Córdoba

Superman returns

muchocine

The result is disappointing. The intention to recover the spirit of the original has been on its surface, in its aesthetic, but not in the fun, adventurous sense of the first.

For me, the Richard Donner Superman is the best superhero movie that has shot because it combines two essential things for me: showmanship and entertainment. In recent years the genre has taken a turn towards darker areas, which have ended up making him a more serious than fun genus. This is not really bad, and films like Batman Begins or Spiderman 2, seem highly recommended, but it does not mean that you take less fun, entertainment and humor that distilled Superman, increased in their increasingly worse sequels.Bryan Singer, director of this new version of Superman, has stated in many interviews that his objective was to continue the work done by Donner for the first and second parte(que_fue_rerodada_en_un_70%_por_Richard_Lester), not wanting to be a rupture in the style of Batman Begins. In addition the original music composed by John Ottmann was going to include themes of the original soundtrack composed by John Williams, among them, how not, the departure of Superman. A movement upstream taking into account recent heroes like Batman have changed of representative item up to three times. For all this, he was eager to see the film, despite my maxim of never see anything with expectations in mind.The result, in my opinion, it is disappointing.The intention to recover the spirit of the original has been on its surface, in its aesthetic, but not in the fun, adventurous sense of the first. Thus, from an aesthetic point of view, the film is a very faithful continuation of designs that made John Barry for the film by Donner. This aesthetic moves even to the choice of the actor who plays Superman, the unknown Brandon Routh, of astonishing resemblance to Christopher Reeve and that comes, surprisingly, well standing in comparison. Unfortunate funny tone has been left aside. We have a solemn film, extremely serious, focused, especially in the recreation of characters and their relationships, see how it feels to Superman after returning to Earth and see his beloved Lois Lane (a gorgeous Kate Bosworth, which is less aggressive than Margot Kidder from the original) has one son and is in love with another manto demonstrate why the world needs Superman. Plot in general much resembles the original and is dangerously close to the remake. The villain of the function is provided by Kevin Spacey as Lex Luthor, and complies with the actor, but he notices, to the film, limited. Singer who did not want any actor rubbing histrionic, even Frank Langella as Perry White. Therefore all reactions are smaller and the villain is less fun/threatening, Gene Hackman in the original light years. Luthor also appears rodedado of some henchmen devoid of any personality and that become worst film, making me miss Otis or Tessmacher.En Miss balance positive direction of Singer, elegant as always. Also the scenes of action, just a couple, also they are very well shot and involve, though all CGI. The picture manages to recreate the original, turning it a bit darker and is really remarkable. The soundtrack only say that Ottmann isn't Williams and, despite not being a bad music, only manages to make you vibrate when inserted flashes or develops the original themes from Williams, that Yes the new theme of love is really beautiful.The film also seems made for the sole purpose of laying the groundwork for a follow-up once already we have all presented characters and pointed, somewhat conflicts as the first part of Spiderman.Un detail, the film, as it has already happened other times with Singer (see X-Men), appears to be much cheaper than what it has cost (about 200 million dollars)which makes it less spectacular than expected.In short, Superman Returns is a decent film that is taken too seriously to itself, resulting in solemn and therefore, away from the spirit of adventure and entertainment pure and simple that guided the original Superman. A penalty.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3941

Ramón Balcells

Alien vs Predator 2

muchocine

It is bad to say enough is enough and contains dialogues that seem taken from the telefilm cheaper history topics abound as they had never done in another film.

After reading reviews that described alien vs. Predator as disastrous, never thought that he would go to see the second part, or even that it would do so. Unfortunately, this sequel exists, done not too hopeful for the science fiction film. It is probably a little better than its predecessor, but Alien vs Predator 2 is too weak to be considered a film. If anything, it could be issued in telivisión, and thus would play perfectly as a film of serie B, but I don't know who had the idea to distribute it as one blockbuster either. It is bad to say enough is enough and contains dialogues that seem taken from the telefilm cheaper history topics abound as they had never done in another film (look at the storyline of the young lovers, quite pathetic). The script is practically non-existent, seems to be written as according to the March, and the villain (human) character it has much less expressive than the Alien or the Predator (excessively cumbersome the fight between these two end). Yes, is a very tacky tacky film (look also at the closing credits), with unforgettable phrases such as "the Government is never wrong" or an end to spare more than "bad" history adolescent teen. And it would have been much better if he had quit as thought I that would end with the helicopter with the last surviving crashing. In short, a huge hodgepodge, made no hint of grace and truly pathetic interpretations. That Yes, contains a couple of scenes quite frightening and not too bad. Better avoid you it, they will come out winning.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4193

Heitor Pan

Los Crímenes de Oxford

muchocine

Those who go to see?The Oxford murders? forgetting who is the director, just ready to be carried away by the game, you will enjoy a first class, with surprising twists and delicious characters Cluedo.

"The perfect crime is not one that remains unresolved, but that is solved with a false culprit".The great (in various senses) Alex de la Iglesia change log, thematic and country to serve us a product of pure entertainment, in the style of the Dan Brown novels, with a strange crime related to mathematics, a few suspects enough freaks and dialogue laden with conspiracy theories, pseudo-filosóficas and strokes visions of humor mark of the House.Martin (Elijah Word) is a brilliant student of mathematics that flies from America to London that Professor Seldom (John Hurt), a recognized eminence, oversee his doctorate. Although at first, their different views on the science and the life separated them, the murder of Martin, intimate friend of Seldom home, they will join them in the search for the guilty.The successive deaths and some notes left by the killer with obvious mathematical connotations, seem to relate to the old teacher in crimes, initiating an intellectual battle between the persecuted and their captors.The different visions of reality of the two protagonists, the plot become a dialectical game in which each tries to convince the other of his ideas. The romantic and idealistic vision of Martin, who believes that there are absolute ideas, immutable universal truths from which we can understand both nature as human behavior collides frontally against the cynicism of the Professor Seldom, convinced that at the end random is one of the bases of life, which you can never trust or get to analyze. Can the flapping of a butterfly cause a hurricane on the other side of the world?The movie kept me almost unblinking throughout his life, sometimes by rapid dialogues, with mirrors and linked contrarréplicas, others by trying to discover the tracks of the Church it is leaving, who committed the murder and few others, by the overwhelming beauty of Leonor Watling, who left for posterity a scene in apron that happens to my Gallery of fetishes of for life.Alex de la Iglesia puts a breaking point for its cinematography, regardless of almost all their characteristic ICT to serve a film more academic, to put it in some way. For me this does not imply nor much less a step backwards or a betrayal to his film, but a search for new ways, new challenges, new images.In addition, serves as "The Oxford murders" of the Church for some feats at a technical level, as the false flat sequence (usease, a flat long, seemingly uncut sequence) that reminded me of how it is filmed "The rope", Alfred Hitchcock, in which the director presents the characters related to a wonderful choreography.Perhaps the only time in which the film squeaking is in relations of Martin with the female characters, too TThe, perhaps in an attempt to not distract attention to the central plot and not extend the footage unnecessarily in a work that is pure entertainment, without more pretensions.Anyway, those who go to see "The Oxford murders" forgetting who is the director, just ready to be carried away by the game, you will enjoy a first class, with surprising twists and delicious characters Cluedo. Who aims to solve the mystery?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3186

Silvia Giner

Las 13 Rosas

muchocine

Touching story of 13 women executed unjustly. These women whose memory has not erased the history were as "Las 13 Rosas", Martinez-Lazaro recovers these facts becoming one of the films of the year.

This is the touching story of 13 women who you had to live a harsh reality after the Spanish Civil War. Almost all minors, were unjustly executed on 5 August 1939 in the walls of the cemetery of the Almudena. These women whose memory has not deleted the history, they were remembered as "Las 13 Rosas" and Martinez-Lazaro retrieves these facts into what certainly will be one of the films of the year.Las 13 Rosas, from my point of view is the peak of Emilio Martinez-Lazaro, the definitive work. Directed with a taste of exquisite and accompanied by Original Soundtrack (by Roque Baños) that perfectly complements the satellite and you moved to a world full of textures, colors and even smells.These girls had not committed any crime or offence except be affiliated to the Socialistaslo youth which seems that you served as an excuse for generating unrealistic reasons and be carried to a Council of war that would judge them unfairly accusing them of events which had not carried out without testing and depuñes have been subjected to imprisonment and harsh police interrogations. The end of all this was to give a lesson to the whole society to persuade that not revelera against the established regime.Account director, who at any time has tried to be faithful to the fact real taking as point of view for the film turn their characters more in heroines, victims. For this reason and that would have been unbearable on screen, has not wanted to show the details of the horror suffered by these girls. So then proceeded to make a synthesis that would allow the story to fit with the footage.It is a drama film which you gets into the soul deeply. The art direction is outstanding, but I still like I Veronica Sanchez, overshadowed by a unstoppable and majestic Pilar López de Ayala and Marta Etura. It is absolutely transducer, everything plays it like, except certain nuances, is as saw the same character forever but in different situations of a life itself. And to make matters worse accompanied by Fran Perea which not paste or glue and reminds us how not to "Los Serrano", a total prick in an artistic piece that if it were not for these two, we could describe as perfect.Special mentions for that fabulous actor, magno and regio Asier Etxeandía starred a stellar moment when he plays the main theme of the film in French. Also for the rightly rescued Goya Toledo that brings the most out of your character and demonstrating an important interpretative maturity.On this occasion I will let the issue of the ages of some actresses because the result is really so good it deserves the penalty sacríficar the credibility of youth.To watch movies as Las 13 Rosas, you can breathe with some relief thinking that "at last something decent in the middle of the precarious and pathetic picture of the Spanish film" we are starting to make good movies and shows, this film.As I said at the beginning we are dealing with a very meticulous film, locations and costumes I've loved, I've tried to remove all possible faults and only I found Verónica Sánchez skirt was crooked in a sequence, but it is otherwise a totally successful and well documented costume. (Congratulations Lena Mossum).Absolutely recommended film, I think that it is the very best you are going to see this year in the Spanish scene.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2544

Caty

Magnolia

muchocine

Magnolia becomes one of the best works of 1999 (and see this year was prolific), as well as my conviction that this film will become, over the years, one of the great classics of cinema.

After surprise half a world with the excellent "Boogie Nights", the young director Paul Thomas Anderson, was a challenge to front, that persons who had vibration with the previous film, find in Magnolia something really stimulating, writing an innovative and complex script that counts the events in the lives of nine people during a period of twenty-four hours in the city of Los Angeles. In this regard, Magnolia begins in a manner less original. In its opening sequence, in a rather ingenious way, it addresses three narratives of deaths that have incredible coincidences. From this point, the tape delve into the lives of the characters, creating a tangible expectation of discovering as everyone in the viewer they intertwine at the end of the story.The greatest feat of Paul Thomas Anderson is perhaps its ability to achieve the Viewer to be involved with all the figures which cross the screen. Interspersed with various frames, the director manages to maintain a steady pace. Thus, at the same time we accompany Earl Partridge his convalescent dying of terminal cancer, we discovered that his wife is stuck in a kind of "crusade" of self-destruction by having misled for years to her husband. In the Middle, we get to know Frank T.J. Mackey, a "guru" of self-help that teaches insecure males to flirt. Meanwhile, we are informed, that, in reality, Frank is the son of Earl (which they find out the nurse in the second, Phil, at the behest of the dying). In addition, Jimmy Gator, the presenter of a programme you extensive starring gifted children - including the small Stanley, always under pressure from his father-. Gator is the father of Claudia, a young woman brutally hooked to cocaine at the same time and that by chance know the sensitive police officer Jim Kurring. And can we not forget Donnie Smith, who in his childhood was one of the great stars of the Gator program? and this is only the beginning, friends.With a gallery of characters so interesting, it would be injustísimo to highlight a single performance, because the distribution of Magnolia is fully competent: If on the one hand we have Philip Seymour Hoffman, whose look of kindness and understanding is exciting, on the other hand have Tom Cruise in one of the best roles of his career, intense and exaggerated. Do on the other hand, John C. Reilly shows us that he deserved a place in Hollywood to keep a perfect chemistry with the talented Melora Walters? and at the same time that the young Jeremy Blackman demonstrates a talent in the making, the veteran Jason Robars rubrica one of the most intense roles of his extensive career. We have also always competent William H. Macy, who is representing an individual pathetic and confused with your own feelings. The only disappointment, in my opinion, is that of Julianne Moore(y_mira_que_esta_actriz_me_suele_gustar_casi_siempre), which starts the hysterical tape and will deflate slowly.With 188 minutes of footage, Magnolia not weary, because there is always something to look at the screen. Always intriguing, the film has two scenes worthy of praise: the first occurs when Jason Robards remembers his first wife and regrets the mistakes made in the past, doing a poignant speech at the same time that all the characters through their own moments of difficulty. The second is even more exciting if it should be, since it represents the climax of the suffering experienced by all, that just linking to sing a single song.Full of messages, the beautiful script of Anderson, emphasizes issues such as love and the disappointments, the complicated relations between parents and children? and are, to name just two issues of this superb film.For me, in conclusion, Magnolia becomes one of the best works of 1999(y_mira_que_este_año_fue_prolífico), as I am convinced that this film will become, over the years, one of the great classics of cinema.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2947

Naty Buqué

Zodiac

muchocine

The film can be read, rather than as the terrible and terrorizing story of a murderer very, very bad, as a reflection on the media and the role they and the information in a modern and hiperglobalizada society.

One can not standing up to the DVD to see this movie without thinking "I'll see a Fincher film, I'll see a Fincher film" (emotion) or even "want to see the fight club / Seven" (choose your favourite). Well, that's a shit, because it is and see the new Wong Kar Wai wait in a spirit of love. Or end of read in search of lost time and expected that Proust has had time to write something else. Conclusion: One should not be so demanding.So I'm going to forget about the past of Fincher, and I will remember Zodiac, at the earliest, in the context of the genre to which it belongs. Zodiac is a very good police-thriller about crazy Yankees gutting people.The film, which is long, is true (and while it is obviously cut off by all parties and the little signs of "x" later go faster than the end credits) follows the story of a murderer "serial" (the series is not so obvious) over a few years who do not can grab, basically, because it does not move under any pattern nor have any mobile to kill people.The interesting thing about the film, which is not noted for revolutionizing the cinematographic language in any sense at least, lies, first, in the constant tension generated not so much with the prior suspense murder scene but in an atmosphere of strangeness is not confined to the space of the crime that expands throughout the film, even in its moments of humor and calm. And also follows when you apagaste the TV.On the other hand, the film Dodge all the clichés that fall systematically the police/trhillers on serial killers. First, the murderer is not an invincible genio-loco who commits murders following a pattern that has more to do with quantum physics than with the victims. The type makes mistakes, lies, shows certain weaknesses, platitudes in his personality. It will be crazy, but he is human. Secondly, I'm going to subtly say to not ruin the end, the detective is not an idealized character nor the justice and truth necessarily succeed. But neither triumphs crime. The film also avoids the typical structural bipolarity of the film. There is a good and a bad: there is a killer course (perhaps two, or only a madman who has been awarded crimes), a number of suspects that can not be discarded entirely, people who claims to be the Zodiac but obviously isn't the police, press, a kid who is interested in the case and wants to solve it, and there is a power struggle between them, and there are bureaucracies that suspend the alleged justice or the possibility of accessing a supposed truth. And the story is taking different points of view, which is very interesting because, adding the end (which I will not tell), everything contributes to a very strong and quite radical reflection on the possibility of knowledge and certainty of justice.The film leaves a feeling of uncertainty (redundancy), something that is diluted. The murderer cannot exist, they may be two accomplices, or he/they could have not only committed crimes but also awarded others who have not committed, or have been only awarded unsolved crimes. The killer can only be a specific order of speeches that he collects and organizes knowledge, the description and the award of a group of crimes. The film can be read, rather than as the terrible and terrorizing story of a murderer very but very bad, as a reflection on the media and the role they play and information in a modern and hiperglobalizada society, or even, as a reflection on the idea of truth (the film does not use, as they tend to do all of this genus)one thing that is the truth and is a person and should be getting it. The truth is not evidence that moves, changes of place between the characters, as a power. (It does this tranquility to the Viewer.)I mean, the film adds to the paranoia that persecutes these Yankees of "there are assassins loose everywhere" but that on the other hand, functions as a critique and a deep reflection on how this phenomenon and what place occupy different institutions therein. Finally, as one no minor detail, I thank Mr Fincher avoid me the very easy and free little blood-filled scenes.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1969

Rafa Ferrer

Darwin Awards (Muertes de risa)

muchocine

It entretiende, fun and like, apart from entertaining his approach and know laugh of something as serious as death.

Dramatic comedy film directed by Finn Taylor, in her second film after ten years of drought in the direction. Starring Joseph Fiennes, who knows how to carry all the weight of the comical with Winona Ryder, which becomes you see so expléndida on screen.The truth is that the tape, at times a little is chorra, but manages to play with the comical of the spectator and at other times start some another smile in the audience, it is also true to the bullshit of deaths I have come to remind the saga of teen horror "Final destination", where the only thing that was worth was the way to die, to more chorra and far-fetched better.Accompany these two a huge number of side, such as David Arquette, Chris Penn, Julianna Margulies as well as Juliette Lewis, in this film than in with a light touch of SERIE B and low-budget film, achieved in a short space of footage leave with a good feeling and a pleasant taste.It entretiende, fun and like, apart from entertaining his approach and know laugh of something as serious as death.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3429

Kiko de España

The Birthday

muchocine

Lynch, SciFi "of tó life" and many bad host in a sadly cursed movie in the film Spanish. A delusion that needs an audience willing to be carried away.

Review The Birthday, the movie of Eugenio Mira, and me happened it big. I have to admit that when I saw her for the first time it was Virgin (very very very Virgin) and I saturated both for good and for evil.View the edition published on dvd by Versus (re) discover an intense, imaginative and absolutely hilarious film filled with flat sequences, bizarre characters, Lynch, Scifi50's and racing a little to Buñuel. But racing.All these references give the perfect film, so credible atmosphere as Donnie Darko Amen to retrieve for the big screen to Corey Feldman, a compelling reason to not miss the film now that her we can buy in the Court English. A delicious madness which thank you view it at home because I remember the climax in the movie theater with the volume at full blast and it still hurts the ears. The flat end is a joy.PS: I remember that the version screened at the sample of the Palafox was in real-time. Let us not forget that the movie are the minutes rare 117 of the life of Norman Forrester. The dvd is a correct "cut" of 96'.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1554

Lady Winter

The host

muchocine

An interesting and innovative Bong leads with good pulse and approach best eye cinematógrafico, that hooks quickly and offers, in addition to a good time, much think about what.

Imagínen a good morning a gruesome monster emerge from the sewers of the city and begins to Prime with our neighbours. "Nothing new under the Sun"? We think? "now come the special forces of the army, or a calloused and heroic police officer, or a giant robot that will save the day". That have become accustomed us the action and horror films. But here's the boy prodigy of the Korean film, Bong Joon-ho - who already offered his depressing vision of terror in the held Memories of Murder - to ask ourselves: is really that what would happen? When the golpée disaster: who will be really there to protect us?Gang - du Park is a loser with few lights that works at the snack bar of his father at the Bank of the River Han, in where the inhabitants of Seoul enjoyed a pleasant summer day. Both are visited by Hyun-seo, the teenage daughter of Gang-du: he wants it with madness, but his work as a father "and head of the family" leaves much to be desired, despite his attempts to please her as the save every penny to win to buy a mobile generation. While Gang-Du is the service, the weekenders warn a strange form hanging from one of the bridges; moments later, a monstrous creature has emerged from the river and campa to rampant hunting down the panicking bystanders. Gang-du, desperate, can see only as the beast drags Hyun-Seo with them.It is surprising how the film deals with the theme of the monster: parodying her and chopping it from the first moment. The transition between the knowledge of fondly manners family Park and the irruption of the monster is so abrupt that cause, in a first moment, disbelief. Against all the precepts of the suspense, the monster is shown in its entirety from the outset. To design it seem to have attended before biological criteria that the dread: the monster is simply an antropófaga whale with legs, nothing terrifying jaw of the Tyrannosaurus or the babeantes jaws of the Alien. The quality of the animation underscores that impression of watching something too real as to enter the game from the movie monsters. In the first minutes of the film, all topics (including the heroic American soldier) will come down.The film will continue in a bittersweet tone, mixture of tragedy and comedy. The reunion of the brothers of Gang-Du (a licensed alcoholic unemployed with revolutionary past and a sharpshooter of arc fails to pass the bronze) before the supposed funeral altar of Hyun-Seo is paradigmatic: four relatives are twisted pain on the floor while they hit each other and the flashes of the journalists riddled you. The family Park is maintained by the Government in quarantine while authorities alarmed about a virus allegedly transmitted by the monster. However, a call from Hyun-Seo will make them know that she is alive, captive in the lair in which the creature stored their prey. In the face of general indifference, the family Park must join overcome his own frustrations, sacrifice everything to deal with both the monster and greed and hypocrisy of a society that leaves a montage directed from the highest level to manipulate. An interesting and innovative Bong leads with good pulse and approach best eye cinematógrafico, that hooks quickly and offers, in addition to a good time, much think about what.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4206

Carlos Giacomelli Puig

Monstruoso

muchocine

Cloverfield is a spectacular divertimento, which unlike other get uncomfortable with hyperrealism which entails being recorded by way of home video. The penalty is that we have already seen "[Rec]" and "The Host"...

On the occasion of the Rob (Michael Stahl-David) trip to Japan, his friends decide to prepare a party surprise of farewell, which come to among others his recent ex-girlfriend Beth (Odette Yustman), his brother Jason (Mike Vogel), or his best friend Hud (T.J. Miller), this last charge in addition to record everything in his video camera.Suddenly, a shock paralyzes the feast. The average Manhattan lights turn off, a few seconds a terrible explosion in the city stands.Thus begins a struggle for survival, something unknown, hungry to escape. monstrous.Mix between "Godzilla" and "The project of the Witch of Blair" (as well his producer, JJ Abrams), "Cloverfield" is a more than interesting proposal that despite return to the (outdated) attack on major cities in charge of monsters of all kinds, for the umpteenth time brings breath of fresh air to the genre, creating a turning point that for a server would have been much more impressive of not having seen "[Rec]" and "The diary of the dead".Since then, it is not at the plot level where the revolution. Matt Reeves film through all clichés of movie monsters, the argument, the truth, therefore rather predictable and simpleton.But being shot in camera in hand, as with the fantastic film of Balagueró and Plaza, provokes in the viewer a spiral of sensations more intense, as the monster in this occasion is delegated to a background, and is much more important what happens to the Group of protagonists. Indeed, images we have of the creature are quick and confusing, tenths of a second in which the camera, while running looking for refuge, focused upwards and lets us see a shade, or a profile, but never (until the end) we have a detailed image of your body. In the same way that "Signals", for example, the feeling of insecurity causes not knowing very well what it is attacking. This is what we hear and, therefore, imagine, what frightens us.But without a doubt, the most important achievement of "Cloverfield" is realism which emerges despite the impossibility of the situation as of the plot. Unlike "The Host", or the aforementioned "Godzilla", on this occasion no heroes or epic moments. Engaged with the protagonists (and everyone in general) is simply to help each other escape unharmed. In fact, even one could say that it is quite anticlimática, avoiding at all times impossible scenes and americanadas gestas.They certainly help its spectacular special effects. For example, the fall of buildings after the initial attack are a realism that cannot fail to recall the collapse of the twin towers.And is that in the end, "Cloverfield" is not if not a metaphor, a personification of the terror with which us (and the world) live after that fateful 11-S.Es precisely the monster itself which has just disappointing. Is not that it is wrong, it is not much less, if not that has been both him and is his mysticism throughout the film (as they pass the minutes are seeing it with a little more detail, down to the last minute, that we can finally see a map with all luxury of details) and what has preceded himjust knowing a little, resulting in a simple hodgepodge between "The Host", "Godzilla", and "Starship Troopers".Even so, and despite a last scene something free and shameful, "Cloverfield" is a spectacular divertimento, which unlike other catastrophic blockbusters get uncomfortable with hyperrealism which entails being recorded by way of home video. The penalty is that we have already seen "[Rec]" and "The Host", because if we would not be talking about no doubt a real before and after in the genre.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2810

Kiko de España

Going to pieces

muchocine

Approved by nostalgia and recover some huge point, but they could have a little careful above all on the part of Catholic protests and censorship. For the nostalgic.

The photographer of the panic and psychosis inciaron the genre, at least according to the documentary Going to pieces, very entertaining but a tad empty, because of what they are chiefly is to praise a genus that has given us glorious moments: Halloween, Viernes13, burning, Prom night, My bloody Valentine, Camp Blood. the total slasher, with all the good and all the bad things you have; his classics with their exploiteds. Wes Craven, Rob Zombie, Sean S. Cunningham, journalists, critics and a young Roger Ebert putting the leg to the bottom (file, I guess that today fall you the face of shame to say the nonsense stated of the genre at the time) are some of the witnesses of the rise and fall of the slasher.It is entertaining, but as you have not seen any of the movies you are screwed, because it is a documentary filmed based on spoilers.Approved by nostalgia and recover some huge point, but they could have a little careful above all on the part of Catholic protests and censorship. For the nostalgic.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2594

Bruji

Next

muchocine

With a legacy development of Femme Fatale of De Palma and a perfect open outcome, their multiple successes get hide the continuing inconsistency of an obsolete script.

Excellent tape action in which only compliment the pelucón of Cage and, in not few moments, sobreactuada interpretation of Moore. With a legacy development of Femme Fatale of De Palma and a perfect open outcome, their multiple successes get hide the continuing inconsistency of an obsolete script.They can not deny. The USA worship be in constant and imminent danger, and the public loves it. Even dare to assure that those yearn times of the cold war in which a tangible enemy of USSR name was always willing to undermine their vast Empire. When, at last, this happens (Fortunately, only in the best theaters), and the nuclear alert extends to Southern California, from San Diego to Los Angeles; all doubts about the potential incompetence of their Government, are met; the security forces are declared ineffective and insufficient, and a lone (on this occasion, guessed in Las Vegas) manages to save the Humanidad.Con so ridiculous, outdated and absurd plot, collected based on a novel by Philip k. Dick, inspiring of great movie titles like Blade Runner (Ridley Scott, 1982), challenge Total (Paul Verhoeven, 1990) or Minority Report (); Tamahori amply meets the fundamental objectives of the best action genre. Agility in the narrative structure - which soon dispenses with a voice that does not need-, spectacular scenes and a development of rapid pace that creates and maintains the tension; tucked behind political safety an accurate soundtrack and some well-intentioned interpretations, are the main advantages of this production of considerable budget. Although undoubtedly its greatest success lies in the ability of the filmmaker, proven irreproachable and impeccable in the way of directing, to alleviate the many inconsistencies of the script. It matters little that the FBI focused all its efforts to locate the wizard of the 39 steps, rather than attempting to dismantle a gang of international terrorists of mobile and origin unknown, if this relentless persecution is drawn with brilliance. Nothing is concerned the shameful cellular mitosis which undergoes the protagonist, nor his bizarre way of avoid the danger, if after the cameras is one of the best craftsmen of our time.The result translates into a notable exercise of pure entertainment, for an hour and a half, has the virtue of invading the senses of the spectator, preventing him blinking, seducing you from the first frame, forcing him to archive the inconsistent unreality of an exploited argument and up - who knows? - the reality of its existence.Within the cast, we find a reviled, reviled, and often mistreated by critics, Nicolas Cage. An actor who always did what came to him in WINS, producer of his own films, which is at that point that can afford the luxury of making his cloak a sayo. It is not alone in doing so, does perhaps was not Robert De Niro "The father of Ella"?. Julianne Moore, the eternal promise that never ends shine, is convincing when his roles involve not transcendence; to fall apart if you know that your interpretation will be object of praise. Surprisingly, his naturalness in the hand that rocks the cradle, as well as its ridiculous atavism in Lejos del Cielo, or his overacting unconscionable in Las Horas.Jessica Biel, for its part, will achieve a perfect interpretation in its task of good aunt, altruistic master of an Indian reservation, whose charms will not leave indifferent.And, as "know the future remains spontaneity", "freedom means responsibility" and "beauty is the sum of the parts working together in such a way that no required add or alter anything", is possible? and even likely - that this movie manages to make us forget the matters. at least for the next two minutes. Who said that this is not the film?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4081

Javier G. Pasamón

Habitación sin salida

muchocine

The tape, although entertaining, committing some unforgivable errors: abuse of the close-up, play with the spectator, trying to create tension so vulgar and dramatic, the improbability and predictability.

There is no doubt that the horror genre is one of the hardest in the times. Every year we have the misfortune of having to endure products of the more chusquero drink in excess of superior works, without owning any interest for the avid Viewer. And that would be the case of the tape in question, because not only it brings nothing new to the genre but that above at any time the viewer can empathize with the protagonists, by importing a real green pepper happens them or stop moving, and that has crime.Putting on record of the few lights in a script filled with well-worn situations, the relationship between the protagonists: Luke Wilson and Kate Beckinsale, is already taken with pins and ultimately very badly built. Since those initial minutes that seem to be there to present his personal and loving situation - topic among topics within the (bad) current thriller - and during the rest of the footage, both the character of Luke Wilson as the Beckinsale are pure stereotypes of by-products to which we are accustomed the tireless and dubious quality Screen Gems, subsidiary of Sony Pictures.A part of the bad construction of the characters, tension and enemies (rather than unsettle, arriving in hastiar the viewer thirsty something decent), the direction of the Hungarian Antal, certainly leaves to be desired. That not only there is not one thing original or worth mentioning in his speech, but above the Ribbon has one of the endings precipitated more implausible and the crappy dessert a humble servant has been suffering in a movie theater.Following Antal, giving cane here believe "Room no exit (Vacancy)" could have been an estimable tape if I had one iota of risk and more dusty gore (see to see if the director Rob Zombie!) and part of the blame we are in the realization of the brother of Puskás. We agree that this project was a Commission aimed at box office with little to negotiate, but that does not mean that you can not get a poquillo of oil to the matter. And is that tape committing some of the things that I hate and not forgive more: abuse of the close-up, play with the spectator, trying to create tension so vulgar and easy, the improbability and predictability.However, the tape is entertaining and enjoyable, but too predictable and glib. The enemy (s) is discovered immediately, is unattractive for lovers of the genre and we still wonder why it takes so much to Act (well, of course, but the film would last 30 minutes). Everything is very unrealistic and poor but above and to make matters worse it isn't a nice Ribbon. What could have been an interesting tape around the snuff phenomenon and the possibilities that gives a room of an isolated motel, the solution of escape via the dialogue between them or through the display continued the tape looking for tests or methods and a hostile enemy lurking nearby, finally gets a very conventional tapemore close to the style of films such as "Never play with strangers" (John Dahl, 2001) that of other more interesting (than not good) as a "Thesis" of our Alejandrito.La photography of the film carried out by Polish Sekula shows grim environments certainly improved lighting, nothing to do with the work of other early operators such as Darius Khondji, or Harris Savides, which appear to move with better ease and precision in sordid and dark environments. With regard to the score of Paul Haslinger, very typical and little talented.The film should have opted for the psychological thriller rather than by the game of cat and mouse. This is his great failure, its stereotyped approach, knot and outcome, looking for a surprise and a shock never arriving because the mechanisms for achieving them are pure theatrical cheap.Another piece of the genre to rule out of our collection of jewels of suspense-terror. But good friends, do not worry, because we were always wonderful classical tapes, those of the Hammer or contemporary works of filmmakers of the caliber of Fincher, Shyamalan or by some underrated Rob Zombie. Hopefully the proportion of current genre cinema quality was the reverse: every ten films, notable eight. But we all know that, sadly, nowadays is a utopia.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3278

Francisco Bellón

Stardust

muchocine

Stardust is a fun, and exciting film that will enjoy as nice to anyone who wants to enter without prejudice in a story not taken seriously if same.

Fantasy cinema experienced a boom since Peter Jackson broke the box office around the world with the adaptation of the Lord of the rings. In Hollywood they interpreted it as a sign of the potential of the genre, and if there are not, the Chronicles of Narnia, Eragon, the six signs of light, all of them, with strong influences from the films of Jackson.Ahora it is the turn to Stardust, movie that adapts the work of Neil Gaiman, tells how a small village in England in the 19th century is separated from a magical world by a wall. Tristan (Charlie Cox), crosses the magical world to pick up a fallen star and thus be able to marry Victoria (Sienna Miller). However, upon arriving, he meets that the fallen star named Yvaine (Claire Danes), which must protect from a wicked witch (Michelle Pfeiffer). One of the main virtues of Stardust is that not taken seriously if same, giving Matthew Vaugh a tone quite attractive autoparodia. Also has its good dose of humor, and pure at this point, it is impossible not to mention the character of a Robert DeNiro giving vent to his comic vis. But taken seriously, the story is interesting and has all the ingredients for a good tape of entertainment. Stardust captures the viewer's attention from the first moment, and the intensity and pace of the film not decay at any time despite its long duration. At the technical level, it is very successful, and interpretive level, all actors perform to a high level.Stardust is a fun, and exciting film that will enjoy as nice to anyone who wants to enter without prejudice in a story not taken seriously if same. It is far from the levels of the Lord of the rings, but it clearly improves the rest of fantastic films made in its wake.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1299

Caruco

13 tzameti

muchocine

Deserves its distinction for his portrayal of a (sub) cold world and immutable, full of dirty games, unfortunately, even demasiadado with reality.

His number is 13 but numbers, have all to become a cult film, if it is that already it is not. "Tzameti" is this issue in Georgian; "do do a tribute from the director, newcomer Géla Babluani, its grounding in this co-production with France, and wander with this title throughout the world, with a stop in Hollywood, where the Americans are already thinking to create your particular? remake?.""13 Tzameti" is like a Quentin Tarantino to the poor, or a Roman Polanski reminiscing its beginnings to submergirse in the most twisted of the mind.If your presentation is somewhat disappointing, and delinquent to change the crux of the plot drags us towards the total angustía. A feeling increased with the picture in white and black and almost thirty minutes of footage that not only placed his terrified protagonist (Georges Babluani), a young worker of 22 years, drenched in sweat and in the crosshairs of a macabre bet, but also the same Viewer as if he had a loaded gun pointing him in the temple.An unforgiving world.Get easy money carries enormous risks is as true as there are mob with the limits of moral trastocados in search of strong feelings.The longing of each and the precariousness of others become human lives mere pieces or pawns, or "13 Tzameti" in any war. Maybe that it is it recreate too in his home with all kinds of characters that appear and disappear, with these looks, and games of persecutions and forgetfulness. Do do also that music has a tone? amateur?, more appropriate for a short film, reinforcing the idea that its proposal is somewhat stretched.But before the shortage of means, and the abundance of some of the results, this game of horror by the uncanny and the weaknesses of human nature, well deserves its distinction for his portrayal of a (sub) cold world and immutable, full of dirty games, unfortunately, even demasiadado with reality. And step that serves to make Eli Roth, and his "Hostel," take good note, or so that the Tenerifian Juan Carlos Fresnadillo maintain "intact" its capability to create more movies.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2089

Oscar Cantero

Piratas del Caribe: En el Fin del Mundo

muchocine

A worthy end to a trilogy that has resurrected a genus which was dead and buried for decades.

The adventures of Captain Jack Sparrow has been one of the more recent decades followed, and have revitalized a genus which for decades had remained in a latent state, by decision of the large studies that viewers will most unimaginable way.The first installment of this series, Pirates of the Caribbean: the curse of the Black Pearl, was so unexpected as overwhelming success. Skillfully directed by Gore Verbinski, he knew how to Captivate a wide spectrum of public, and soon became a reference for other type of similar productions. The continuation of this first film, Caribbean Pirates: dead man's chest, was able to retain, already without the factor of surprise on their side, the spirit and the spectacle of the first. And now, just a year after the second part, comes Pirates of the Caribbean: the end of the world, which closes the successful trilogy. Although it starts with a pace a little slow and hesitant, indeed soon recover the pulse of the previous two and becomes another film full of strength, vibrating and able to excite the Viewer. Johnny Depp returns to demonstrate that it has few rivals when it comes to portraying colorful characters, and outboard of the role of the cowardly and amanerado, but charming, Jack Sparrow. Orlando Bloom meets more than in his role, while Keira Kneightley (would be a pity if it withdraws from the film really) is impeccable in his role as class wealthy but rebel girl. Excellent photography and its already known and catchy soundtrack, complete a production that will delight fans. As a curiosity, to say that on this occasion appears Keith Richards, guitarist of the rolling stones and one of the references of Depp, in the role of father of the pirate.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/383

El vengador toxico

Piratas del Caribe 2

muchocine

One of the films of adventures more entertaining and fun of the past years.

Finally we have here the continuation of the adventures of Jack Sparrow (Johnny Depp). The great taquillazo of 2006 is on the screens. I guess that almost everything that read this her there will be seen, so I'm going to avoid putting the synopsis.The first thing I have to say is that Pirates of the Caribbean seemed to me one of the films of adventures more entertaining and fun of the past years. To give you an idea, I could give on this blog of 4 star 4 and a half if catches me good. Making this clear, I have to say that this is much lower. It is not a bad film, but it is that the bar was very high.The movie is entertaining. I have heard people at the beginning has been heavy. No, I think need to try to draw an argument and that not everything is action and shots. It is true that the part of the cannibals may be totally unnecessary, but me you are booted smiles who have then there.But well, then comes action, in spades. I've also seen in an interview that not have been used many digital special effects for what gets used. Because I do not know who can believe that, by computer effects abound everywhere. You know, one of those movies that you think should see it on the big screen.Also I like to walk a lot of topicazos of the stories of pirates and adventures of childhood stuff when you were not looking for a meaning to everything: appear cannibals, witches (there are moments in which thought it was within the game of Monkey Island), the profundidades(os_dejo_aquí_la_reseña_deel_kraken_en_la_wikipedia) monsters, the Dutch Errante (with his review review of wikipedia), the patent of corso. All mixed to the good random.Now the comparisons with the first, i.e., what weakens. The bad guys are bad and already, where is the sense of humor that makes a memorable adventures bad? Nothing, or a little bit. The first Captain Barbosa had wonderful moments (or all the credit was Geoffrey Rush?). At least it seems that we will see in the third.The special effects were not so perfect as other times. I do not know if it is due to that the water is always more difficult, but the scenes of the kraken, when they were fast did not believe them me. Moving the tentacles to all milk and what seemed to me is. that they were not real. Also the destruction of ships, the more fast, less credible. However when the action was human speed (tentacles moving slowly, cautiously) Yes it seemed more real, except for the confrontation with Sparrow.En the first film, the action scenes often were at that point so hard that he is staying in a light (light) credibility bordering ridicule, but without transferring it. It is that that may not be true but you not squeaking. Here are a few scrapes Tales: the escape of the bonfire of Sparrow, the duel between Will Turner (Orlando Bloom) and the ex-comodoro on the Ferris wheel, when the Dutch Errante dives with Will Turner hidden in the figurehead. It's like the struggles of Elizabeth (Keira Knightley) crewed Jones. I think that he has learned to fight and keeps them at Bay, even with the changes of flying swords, but why has to kill two pirates backs nailing them swords below the armpits, so to the remangillé?Jack Sparrow was the King of the first, mysterious, enigmatic, ambiguous moral, with those andares, its entry into the port at the beginning was glorious. But it was more, was Captain Jack Sparrow, with resources amazing, ingenuity and skill to leave more TThe situations. In this we have the gait, ambiguous morality (the hero Fund), the humor. but we have lost the ingenuity and cunning out of desperate situations. The flight of the bonfire is a slapstick, not a plan. And the escape from jail, which implies an ingenious plan, us is not shown.As a note to please, here Elizabeth proves not a noble soul, and this ambiguity I like. You give party in the next.And I have spoken several times of the next. The first was a movie with a beginning and an end. It has a beginning, but not an end. stays halfway (missing "continuará"). And it has bothered me enough, I expected a full movie, that lasts two and a half hours. One last thing, after the closing credits there is a scene of seconds, but is not very significant. As well as the first that was to see the live monkey (which by the way, is present in this)

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2525

Tito Chinchan

The Queen

muchocine

As film I finished like, since it is more a documentary with actors. It is interesting if you want to know a little about the Palace life of the residents of the island, but catches us as very distant in the skin of a bull. In addition, it is politically correct.

Cuín, I've seen you give The queen, ja, ja, if I don't do this baleful wit, bust and filled it all viscera and more guts. In a less humorous tone, these films of Kings and Queens I put bad milk. Think a so-and-so, unborn son of another guy who was the son of another guy to infinity and beyond, has more privileges than my son burned me the blood. It is said.The film is about a timely moment in the history of the United Kingdom, the entry into the Government of Tony Blair and the death of Diana, Princess of Wales. Tells us how you lived these moments in Palace, reluctant to any public display of pain over the death of one, and lived it as the people, jaleado by its new ruler.Not be what well tell you. The film is not that it is well or badly, is rather documentary roll. The characters are quite well characterized physically, but not is if they are psychological as well. We assume that if. The atmosphere that recreates, seen mostly from the point of view of the Queen, is very aseptic, with a very cold Queen, advised by his centenarian mother. No, but as the Queen is so bad, what a gem they have. On the other hand, Tony is very close to the people, taking advantage of the refund to win over the people.In short, as film I finished like, since it is more a documentary with actors. It is interesting if you want to know a little about the Palace life of the residents of the island, but catches us as very distant in the skin of a bull. In addition, it is politically correct.It is going to take the time and little else.kisses.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1043

Ramón Balcells

Piratas del Caribe 2

muchocine

Anyway, a too zacchia, noisy and excessive special effects-laden adventure film in which there are not even intrigues.

The famous phrase "second parts were never good" the simple meeting. Yes, it is true that there are plenty of second parts que són infumables, but there are others who, on the basis of a first good delivery, follow the pace and quality of its predecessor. But as you adored, this is not the case of Caribbean Pirates: dead man's chest. Very simple is this phrase, in this case is true. If in the first part, the curse of the Black Pearl, the protagonists were amount of noise and Visual effects, at this resumed remain it. Not nothing has changed, just the story, although it is already much say. It is a film based on a script by the simplest and absurd (look at the scene of struggle formed by the trio of Depp-Bloom-Davenport, look like clowns in a PC game). Anyway, again I can say that this is a fun but totally empty tape (such as the recently criticized the shadow of suspicion). It is a film of summer.Part of a rather attractive idea (a debt of blood with a man Octopus), but Mr Verbinski has not taken her advantage well. The tape is extremely long, and finally as just, with an open end, it would have been more appropriate to that last much less. Although I'm not saying that this end is worse footage, not. You could say is the best of the movie with Johnny Depp. The default is the following question: what is a long movie to make then there is no sure end? Shall not speak of the argument, not by simple, but because I guess that with so much advertising you will know where the thing goes. I will only comment on the script seems untapped, although you may not believe that it is a great idea. It is only attractive.So yes I can highlight is the fun, but too expresiveness, much to do so on purpose, performance by Johnny Depp. It is a role, an untapped hair, but that is at least original. Today we will find few characters of blockbusters that mimic the style of a rock singer and in this case it is Keith Richards. I find it very risky. And there is at least a good evil (I mean his performance): Bill Nighy (Love Actually old rocker). It has a very difficult role. Has to admit that the villains of this trilogy of pirates have been very successful: in the first installment, together again to Depp, which stood out was the great Geoffrey Rush; in this second, Nighy plays a disgusting man Octopus; and in a not yet released third evil, nothing more and nothing less, than Chow Yun-Fat. The rest of the cast not include anyone more. Both the dull Orlando Bloom and the beautiful, but sometimes deadpan Keira Knightley don't give the size. Anyway, a too zacchia, noisy and excessive special effects-laden adventure film in which there are not even intrigues. Everyone knows what in that lucky chest, although it is at least not money (very common thing in adventures of pirates). The money you have spent on production.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3782

Javier Martínez

La quimera del oro

muchocine

Do Chaplin said that he would like to be remembered for this film, was his girl pampered above possibly best and most revolutionary tapes as?Modern times? or more emotional as?Limelight?.

What is true for a type that was not only a great director, but also a great actor, a great producer, a great musician, a great writer, .? I do not believe that there has been no comprehensive one in the history of cinema. The only can do you shadow (and distance) is the great Orson Welles. This film cost a fortune at the time and almost ruins to Chaplin. It was perfectionist until sickly ends, what did they had to shoot shots over and over again until they were to their liking. But the truth is that you worth. Chaplin said that he would like to be remembered for this film, was his Darling above possibly best and most revolutionary as "Modern times" or more emotional as "Limelight" tapes.Charlie contracted the fever of gold and part to Alaska in search of a future better. When it is found that not all the mountain is oregano is trapped in a cabin in the middle of nothing with a murderer and a Hunter hungry Size XXL. I don't want to tell more, see it, your eyes become accustomed to the purity of the film in black and white, enjoy all these gags, the banquet-based, the dancing shoes of the rolls of the hurricane, the bear, everything. It is a comic epic, this man dressed as a tramp made the misfortunes of his time humor, people went to the Chambers and forgot of wars, famines, of dolores. Incarnate in him, in that poor Devil incapable of harming anyone, at the bubbler in the hands of fate were.I don't know if I do well to qualify "The gold rush" as humorous. It has adventures, romances, crying, philosophy, it is simply perfect and made practically only.Finally I leave the scene where dinner his boots, masterful parody of a time where so many wars managed to almost 80% of the world's population thought imitate it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2574

Caty

Olvídate de mí

muchocine

Carrey inhibits all his comic energy to the role of a man attracted and repelled by the free spirit of Winslet at the same time. Amazing and very original.

Amazing film of the multifaceted and histrionic actor Jim Carrey (which has as many detractors as followers), which makes us to demonstrate that it does something rather than to make gestures, exaggerated in front of a camera. It tells the story of Joel Barish, a writer who one day rises and meets the situation that his ex-girlfriend Clementine (Kate Winslet) has gone to a clinic that erase you the memories of her relationship with him. Angry with the news, Joel decides to undergo the same procedure and erase memories of his relationship with her. in full "blanking" of these memories he repent and decides he does not want to forget that piece of his life with another person. It is at this point where starts real surrealism of the film, with Joel trying in every possible way flee within their own mind with Clementine. The argument we have Patrick (Elijah Wood), which serves as the clinic worker, and drawing on the memories of Barish, tries to conquer Clementine, which has fallen in love with Stan (Mark Ruffalo) Assistant and worker along with Dr. Mierzwiak (Tom Wilkinson). Then we can also see Kristen Dunst as Mary, who is the receptionist of the clinic, and that at the end of the movie is going to play a decisive role in the argument.The film is divided into two "realities", one is in the quarter of Joel Barish, where Stan and Patrick, together with the subsequent visit of Mary, make a party with the food and the drink of Joel lasts while the procedure of erasing memories. Patrick just confessing he fell of Clementine to display the memories of her on Joel. The thing is complicated when, as we have mentioned before, the patient is resisting the process and they need the help of Dr. Mierzwiak. That brings us to a second reality, in the minds of Joel.Conforme memories of Clementine disappear, the given account that is going to miss her much and then tries desperately to save her memories in places of his life in which she never was present.One of the rather argued parts of the film is when the characters are not known and are discovered yet again because there is something that attracts them. Carrey inhibits all his comic energy to the role of a man attracted and repelled by the free spirit of Winslet, who changes his way of seeing life as you change your hair color at the same time. We also highlight Wilkinson, which gives the doctor a calm intelligence almost makes us forget the dreadful machine borra-recuerdos of his invention.Even with this plot with very superficial touches of science fiction, "forget about of my!" not surrenders to the ease of special effects. Its strong points are the characters, very well built and very well interpreted.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/820

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Borat

muchocine

Borat is a mediocre film, to be objective, but necessary. Viewing is essential as a useful exercise to document on aspects of American culture that we do not know.

Every little goes a louver that seduces everyone with a different, alien to orthodoxy, film based on original parameters, thinly based on a sublime irreverence. Reminded me Woody Allen's Zelig or Reservoir dogs of Tarantino.Ambas, in its own way, created a way of making films has given noble products and infamous for the greater glory of the greedy box office new formulas that make box. Borat I don't see a finding as outstanding as many want to see. There is a glimpse of these signs of genius in their eighty minutes long. Borat is a grandiose and bombastic guignol of today's American society and escrute with a crude and nothing complacent look of both with knowledge, the way of life yankee and gives us a little rigorous, but accurate, analysis in his casposa derision of the times that we have had to live.The miseries of these sons of Bush, which voted you and which not, explicit admirably in this film. Look vitriólica, politically incorrect, disarms all caring idea of American culture that we can possess: it forces us to consider that the world is unfortunately ruled by such subjects and the such Borat, impeccably played by the British comedian Sacha Baron Cohen, stays, in fact, halfway, because he could have gone (if possible) further still and teach the shames of a country more viciously, with more contempt.Borat is a mediocre film, to be objective, but necessary. Viewing is imposed as a useful exercise to document on aspects of American culture that we do not know and that Michael Moore, that came to mind in several sections of the film, is not to expose as much sharpness, do coarse Humor? With all safety. Vast. Up untold heights. Worst dirty have seen, and at least on this occasion the mock object is fully supported as a subject mofable. PS: refrain souls of blush on the cheeks and little desire to see an ugly film, that not bad. Ugly. Ugly.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3742

Rafa Ferrer

Encantada: La Historia de Giselle

muchocine

They will enjoy, us aguantaremos, and we will have another tape which talk about Christmas right?

I start being condescending, and recognizing that although I have bored me almost from the min. 1 film, feminists, as a general rule, from 6 up to 99 years, who have entered the room, leaving their adult side out, have enjoyed almost as much as a "pig in a quagmire," for my part, I have no other choice that yawning, half asleep, and endure, time and peak that lasts this new animation Christmas Disney.Admito that both swath (between the actors and their animated counterparts there is a similar care) and the Alan Menken score, has been how little that I liked the tape; where, or shines Susan Sarandon (appears so little on screen that you almost forget to be part of the cast), Patrick Dempsey, James Marsden and Timothy Spal, as always (these last 2, up in the soup to see them), perhaps, would save the freshness of Amy Adams, perfect in his role as stupid and bobalicona Disney Princess, as well as the Nice digital squirrel, and that is where, in Disney films, special effects, although care, the order of the day.I imagine that Disney, seeing as well that has worked the film at the box office (where 50% are companions consorts.), will be a sequel, a line of toys and 150,000 merchandising products, and is that, otherwise not, but in the House of Mickey Mouse, sell the movies is the best they can do.On the other hand, I love watching as the city of New York, once again (well sell the city, cohones!) becomes a character more than the film, why not take example elsewhere in the world?Finally, they will enjoy, us aguantaremos, and we will have another tape which talk about Christmas right?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/25

Vsancha

Jarhead

muchocine

One of the best anti-bélicas films from the metallic jacket

The latest film by Sam Mendes (winner of the Academy Award for best director for American Beauty) not disappointed, Jarhead is at the same level as his earlier work. In this, his new work, stresses above all in the way to tell the tale, it away entirely from above that we have seen in any war film. Mendes returns to show the more human side of the characters as it already did in "Road to perdition" and makes him do in "Jarhead", which is not a war film in itself, at least not the concept I war film, is a drama about a naive soldier innocently enters the army and that every day that passes regrets having done so masterfully. Leaves behind his life, family, friends, girlfriend, I work? something that will cost to recover because of his experience in the war. It is inevitable think "Metal jacket" Stanley Kubrick when one sees the beginning of the film. The style of the film recalls much more to European war films (see Stalingrad, enemy at the gates?) where it is given more importance to relations between the soldiers than to the war conflict itself. Highlight, once again in a movie of Mendes, the impeccable technical aspect, the picture returns to be great, with those perfect images of the desert. The direction of Mendes returns to be perfect, camera is where it should be, is not dramatic nor looking for shocking scenes type saving private Ryan, perhaps even the history tells Mendes, on the soldiers and the war is more impressive than any scene of saving private Ryan. The BSO again magnificent, perfectly accompanies the film, initially when I heard some themes before seeing the film, not identified him with a war film, but then in the film fit perfectly and make a round film Jarhead. The performances, the casting is phenomenal but I must highlight the main Jake Gyllenhaal (Donnie Darko), which makes a deep and complex, almost perfect performance and which reflects his feelings perfectly at all times. Jamie Foxx gives life to the sergeant major Sikes, a non-commissioned officer who feels comfortable being what it is, a professional soldier. And also a great convincing performance as Peter Sarsgaard. No doubt Jarhead is one of the best anti-bélicas films that have been filmed from "Metallic jacket" and that we can identify its anti-war message with works by the likes of "Without quiet on the Western Front" or "Paths of glory". A film which shows the stupidity of the war, as they have evolved the wars, where now fight "at a distance" where you don't see the face of the enemy and where soldiers are trained as killing machines and at the end their unique shots are open-air fruit of his frustration. Soldiers who live unforgettable experiences, leave behind all his life and then there is no possible return will always remain a cabezabote whatever you do. This is especially seen in one of the final scenes when a veteran of the Viet Nam gets on the bus when they get home, receiving them as not received you and as they see what they will turn with the passage of the years. His life will always be linked those moments lived with your classmates in the trenches with a few classmates who become brothers, "blood brothers". Welcome to the suck!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/940

Txapulin

Renaissance

muchocine

An interesting experiment that less complex and more understandable structure with a script would have been better.

I saw this film in the Art Futura, and it seems that it has no release date yet in Spain, although in France months ago is on DVD. The first surprise I took is that the supposed "original version" that we passed was in English, and the closing credits featured Daniel Craig (Yes, the new Bond), Catherine McCormack, Jonathan Price and Ian Holm. I surprised because I thought that this movie like A Scanner Darkly was filmed and later rotoscopeada, but no, the movie is in 3D, using motion capture for movements and a special renderer that creates the black and white effect. If we go to the page of the wikipedia of the movie, we see that Daniel Craig only has done the voices in English, a such Patrick Floersheim, French voice and Robert Dauney movements. Nothing more and nothing less than three actors for a same character. The effect is visually, awesome, although just tired the view.The movie is like a futuristic James Bond, no wonder the choice of the voice of Craig for the English version. In the year 2054 scientists seem to have discovered the fountain of eternal youth, and a company wants to keep the secret to use it for their own benefit. Our protagonist, inspector Karas discovers things that the company will try to avoid that they come to light.The plot is complex and is explained in a somewhat confusing way, and, despite the amount of (good) action (impressive persecution of cars to the Bank of the Seine) and that does not pass 1 h 40 ′, made me long. The use of the technique of black and white in maximum contrast (i.e., no grayscale) seems just as free as the Rotoscoping in A Scanner Darkly. But accepting the technique as a novelty in the world of 3D animation, I want something more. Also, it must be said that there is a restricted use of the grey (in transparencies, for example) and some colors perfectly justified in certain moments of the movie.An interesting experiment that less complex and more understandable structure with a script would have been better.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/165

Silvia

En tierra de hombres

muchocine

The interpretation of Charlize Theron became the epicenter of the film and makes it worth waiting to see the predictable end

The mines are not for women. or that is what they believe the men of North Country when back in the eighties, they begin to working women in the mine of that region. However, there appears Charlize Theron to prove otherwise. "Land of men" is the film that nominates Charlize Theron for the Academy Award for best main actress, for the second consecutive year. The interpretation of Theron in this film returns to pleasantly surprise after his transformation into "Monster", tape in which he played a prostitute and assassin, sentenced to death in 2002. In this new drama, the actress embodies the character of Josey M'aimes, a battered mother of two children who returns to his hometown after leaving her husband and decides to work in the mine because the craft he reported more money than anyone else. Of course, the fact that women work in the mine isn't appropriate in the traditional North Country people by what the character of Josey confronts with his parents (Richard Jenkins and Sissi Spacek) and fellow of the mine, who see their jobs threatened by women and downloaded their iras with sexual assault and humiliation to her companions. But the character of Charlize Theron is not resigned and struggle to ensure respect for their rights by presenting a lawsuit against his superiors by his indifference to the harassment suffered by women at the mine. Josey counted with the support of their peers for filing the demand, a judicial action that became the first joint demand ("class action", in English) by sexual harassment, and ending by modifying legislation in all America. three plot lines intertwine in the Indent at three different times: the trial, problems in the mine suffered by the protagonist and the adolescents in the town are displayed Alternativelyas the statement as a witness of Josey unfolds. At the end of the film - pretty predictable - bind three times the script pretty fluently. Abuse, sexual abuse, unmarried mothers, degenerative diseases, problems generates international between father/daughter or mother/son, kidnapping of children conflict undoubtedly seeking play the chord of spectator, which is why in this film there is no room for comedy. Another weak point may be the fact that perhaps because of the enormous amount of characters that appear in the film, it is impossible that all of them appear perfectly psychologically outlined. The interpretation of Charlize Theron, instead, has become the epicenter of the film and makes it worth waiting to see the predictable end.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/556

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Serpientes en el avión

muchocine

Fast film food in its purest form. A solemnity bad movie. I escuece when we see it and escuece hours later when we wonder what dark reasons we move, on occasions, to betray our faithfulness to the good movies.

If by something we must remember snakes on the plane in the future will be for his back more that the same film in itself. Esfast film food in its purest form: a pizza four stations that we eat in a serious den, but we devour with gluttony because, besides the fact that hungry, move us lower passions, not comentables vices. We all have, at bottom, an aftertaste cuasimasoquista to see film garbage, and along the way, enjoy of its pathos, of his resignation accepted quality. Snakes on a plane is a solemnity bad film. I escuece when we see it and it escuece hours later when we wonder what dark reasons we move, on occasions, to betray our fidelity to the good cinema, cinema who says things and tells them in Nice shape, with beauty.The back to which I refer is his trap, the starting point for their misleading script as it turns out, dear reader of this page of cinema, which nobody has written the screenplay has been written by all. That is, New Line Cinema, parents of the monstrosity, the novel perpetraton idea dig screenwriter in the network, offer bits of the film that the surfer, true depository of the ruthless machinery of Hollywood, contributes his bread crumb or his entire according to want to bar, as wit.They were blogs, and not the narrative ability of a kind locked in the attic of his house, which discussed the puzzle of the plot, although missing pieces and those that are are manidas, oxidized, eaten by a lethal rust. If this is the way that they will go the shots in the cinema of the future, I head back to the glorious past, which both pleasure it has given to my concerns. Back to the classics and to those who, not so, exude honesty, wanting to check a decent product that can entertain (the film is many things, but above all is entertainment). Snakes on the plane will be remembered by his back door (I insist) and because our Elsa Pataky, blonde Bonbon that Garci knew how to take advantage of Ninette, appears in three loose of the footage in its first USA.Plethoric youth of adrenaline that wants to be dumped to a roller coaster of ophidia assassins in a unusual framework (! a plane!) will be satisfied their demands. Others, which come, young or talluditos with more than one finger in front and three quarters of mastermind to not admit that they fooled them with so much effrontery, not go to the Chamber: not dilapidarán euros of sacrifice.If we explain exclusion the bizarre apparatus of marketing that secunda, snakes on the plane had entered directly on the shelves of the video shops in neighborhood, along with Jackie Chan, Steven Seagal and that muscular Pleiad of actors of fifth category that thicken their accounts with foxes viewers that do not ask much something as serious as it is the cinema. We ignore if aware of a this draught pigswill swallowing irreparable mode affect the palate of the teenager who is her swallow, without French fries or half a litre of coca-cola light.There is even a snake that sneaks under the skirts of a sleeping Lady, between dream and dream, think see your fantasies clitoridianas served. Here (in this metaphor of the crude) the true symbol of this thing. I do not know if forgive to Samuel l. Jackson, who I really dazzled in Pulp Fiction, which I loved in Jackie Brown (ay Tarantino, that you are at all), but the hand opens single and $ fall like manna from heaven for the ignorant. Up Anaconda, another serie B neighborhood video store, entertained me more. It will be by Jennifer Lopez.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/186

Pablo

Psicosis

muchocine

Nothing returned to be the same and most importantly, no one returned to be equal.

There are millions of horror films a year. In fact, most are copies of copies of remakes of yesteryear. But that concerns us, reinvented the genre. Nothing returned to be the same and most importantly, no one returned to be equal. At no time do deny that this is one of the most overvalued Hitch, but just as happened with the Beatles the public connected in a special way, and when that happens, everything becomes a fantastic folly.Let memory, the great success which marked psychosis was due more to marketing that the novelty of the invention, this confused structure of script that left the Viewer without half of film the protagonist was still shocking. The public perceived as well a kind of horror that they had never before experienced in a cinema, a terror into the unknown, no one had no idea which would be the next move of the master of suspense. And it is that studying in detail the film one realizes that the protagonist of the novel is the terror in its pure State. The absence of a face that blame for the evil that is happening in the Bates Motel was that from the outset intended to the director, that as they tend to say, there is no greater fear that which is unknown. Simple and stunning scenes of acuchillamientos are to freeze us blood to the rhythm of this disturbing music which becomes owner of our nervous control and makes us forget bugs so incomprehensible as the fact that while Marion (Janet Leigh) this being stabbed in the shower is not a single spot of blood on the knife. If I had to do a brief overview of the plot for all those who have not yet had the pleasure of seeing her I would say that the film tells the story of a young malversadora who comes to the Bates motel with $40,000. Paragraph here is the have to do with a strange owner and her dominant mother.I remember the first time I visualicé the movie I loved it, was something avant-garde and to my liking, still retained his classic touch. Something that certainly makes it a unique piece. And although in years following its premiere published sequels that would attempt to profit through the successes of the original never reach him nor to the sole of the shoes (Psycho II / III Psycho / Psycho IV). Salvadorans as it is the case with most of the sagas of terror, if they see a character succeeds so they squeezed to the maximum, systematically destroying the charm and mystery that possessed. Even being one of the best films of all time, this was not free of a remake, so fashion are in modern times due to the lack of imagination and the compulsive need to acquire income. This fact denotes as currently the industry prevails over art. In conclusion I would like to refer to the soundtrack, which, in my opinion is one of the most memorable of the genre along with the glow.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1944

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Spiderman 3

muchocine

Spider-Man 3 uses a palomitero speech modern, embedded in epic battles and very convincingly reduced by an overwhelming paraphernalia of special effects, but it decays purely dramatic machinery, in the challenge of mixing with meridiana credibility the operative part and the theatrical script, which sometimes seems pobretón, devoid of verve.

Case that cinema had not implemented his financial eye in the comic, it would have survived another hundred years and a good handful of enthusiasts of all ages unconditional fidelity, would have earned but there not prospeccione Philo than Hollywood and Spiderman is one spectacular enough as to make the franchise of the character of Stan Lee promises to become parents to their teenage viewers and who knows if in the end come to the cinema with their children. As to me has happened to me, except that I sucked in the last 1970s comics and even hurt me check how wonderful black and white became a bright color. So this self-confessed fan of the trepamuros gets carried away by the charm and the fabulation and will write that Spider-Man 3 is a good film: as the previous ones were. To following I become the Spider-man mutated in bad Spider-man and under the rating: Spider-Man 3 is a mediocre film. If proceed in this moral discount insurance just with what perhaps, ultimately, I item: that Spider-Man 3, the expected film, the movie buff joy of this bred scribe to the smell of the ink of the Marvel Comics Group, is a bad film, but (do not confuse) height a lot entertainment. Mesmerizing choreography of flights and fighting blind me not to recognize the fabric weighs theirs and that there is a moment in which we can not withstand dramatic pressure of three empestillados mortal enemies to burst the head Peter Parker. The Green Goblin, the sand man and the terrifying Venom, that leaves little and deserves a separate chapter, will be fulfilled joys the child and adolescent public, fascinated by the noisy fanfare of these heroes with powers that materialize their dreams, bedeviled by the gloomy reverse force, but in this installment they fatigue, they overwhelm, they finish off the patience of adult audiences based on call infographics, which does not take long to realize that is not attending a serious film (the way of life of others or letters from Iwo Jima or the twilight of the gods) but a modern Opera buffa that mixes without excess drama, the comic vein and fast-paced action. This cinema popcorn so gratifying contains traces of cinema of quality, absorbent images that are going to love to any gourmet of the seventh art: the birth of Sandman is fabulous, lyrical, filmed with the indispensable contribution of technology but with artisan taste and even MIME. Raimi is a fan of the series and has even admitted that the creation of one of the wicked (the such Venos) has been particularly enjoyable. All this operatic bombast lowers to Nice pastiche: their brand is none other than the distraction, the singular commitment of cajole to the respectable for 150 minutes and leave the room shrunk, overwhelmed and, above all, delighted to have had those minutes to enjoy the absolute glory cinema (b) incorporated in a budget of very generous-series. In the middle of all this embrollo of heroes and villains, masks and punches, opens to nudges a love story that view advertising, feared I longer and, at the end, not the founding purpose of the story has tangled. The more deadpan Kirsten Dunst gives the classic Mary Jane a tragic profile does not convince, but nor is there a decent script so the moza grip to the text and give credible key. Love and action cinema have never matrimoniado well. There is no film of action melodramas that exhibits to the Sirk as there is no film of King Vidor, who keeps between his findings epic adventures or scenes encrusted inmarcesible heavy-handedness of the fists of the hero of the day. This is the life. Or the film. Hybridize disparate genres is not easy task and Sam Raimi, who performs in the dynamic part, lost his disquisition on the unbearable lightness of the hero. Also American, enthroned to the iconography of the bars and stars and worshipped as ever by the hypnotized parish of locals pasmados by the undeniable charm of our neighbor and friend Spiderman.Que Peter Parker is idiotizado by his new costume of pop icon enables that Raimi, attentive observer of the psychology of the hero proppiana, slow the Vertigo of roofs and cobwebs to write a supposedly deep speech of the circumstances of the value, loss of identity and also the conquest of compassion. This almost Shakespearean Hank of values and concepts, theoretical filigree that sometimes it is bland and other excessively heavy, would make the delights of a Freud of these times, that would be the metaphorical figure of the suit which removes evil and rises it to the paroxysm of acrobatic delight with great eyes (that's my harvest, not Freudian lucubration).Anyway, I returned the film and I'm back resolutely happy. Not asking for one these uppercase distractions feed cinefilia - so have this night some ration of Orson Welles already prepared on dvd. I nor Chase to find the absolute joy and that the review is inflated praise. I write with that feeling pleasant to have fulfilled a task and have not come excessively damaged in the company. I feared, I insist that I am a confessed fan of Spidey, which turned my admiration, my devotion, my natural inclination to forgive any excess that weighted my desire and my vices, and almost nothing of the sort happened. The franchise is solidly based in the perfect script for the dollar: Columbia has spared no even one single. Cares well little glorious magazines of the bouquet and the critical blogger/Cyber wrecking in general based on murderous prose the virtues of your product.To me I thought that Spider-man we have for a while. And post to compare Harry Potter does not have great face fool that highlights Tobey Maguire in some shameful (by ridiculous, dances including) pieces of the film. Or maybe Harry, condemned by an Incubus of the three to the fourth, da best face of memo.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/190

Jose Luis

Misión imposible 3

muchocine

Another tape that Tom Cruise will look, where ironically, which he wears is Philip Seymour Hoffman

At this point almost no one remembers that some decades ago a television program called mission: impossible, had a great impact of hearings to show a group of characters to solve team a series of operations, which as its name indicated were virtually impossible. And this owe it to Tom Cruise, who had the caprichito buy rights and turn it into a tape which was sent to the devil the original concept and that only served to show off its qualities of Star Hollywood. The first two tapes had a good commercial success of course, doubling the already if fat bank accounts of Tom and allowed him to perform the third tape, that supposedly closes the trilogy.Mission impossible 3, occurs in a different world that existed when the previous film in the series appeared, a world in which no longer exist the twin towers, which is why the meaning of the theme changed dramatically and is seen with new eyes. But that is not the only change from mission impossible II the date the audiovisual language of the genre is to modified and advanced, especially thanks to some series television as 24 and Lost. What is other intelligent send call to j. j. Abrams, that applied you to the tape the Vertigo of a good chapter of lost and although in the first instance we can say that it did and I believe an entertaining tape, we must also say that at times also it seems that is this seeing some chapter melcochero of a melcochera novel. Put that Abrams occurred to him humanizing the main character and adding one part romantic, so now Ethan and try to save the world, must keep secret his work to your partner and try to lead a normal life. So on top of being a secret agent who travels the world fighting evil, you have to take out the garbage every night. And although in general the tape runs fine, recovers a little teamwork supposed is the essence of the original concept and presents an extraordinary quite memorable scene within the genre, bridge, this is one of those movies that not cares about seem credible and instead one has to agree to concessions that requestsso that one can swallow the story that the characters can die and revive at the whim, learn self defense in seconds and that a team can enter and invade. The Vatican! Scene it is curious, as the Vatican, one of the themes of another summer film the Da Vinci Code, which by the way was very well in Cannes.En end another tape that Tom Cruise will look, where ironically, which he wears is Philip Seymour Hoffman as a villain of luxury, proving once more which is a great actor, to give life credibly to an arms dealer, that seem to only speaking in monosyllables.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/129

Jose Luis

Rosario Tijeras

muchocine

By killing a man cobra 1,000,000 and bedtime with the one million and a penny

Say the gringos that current actresses mas sexis are Scarlett Johansson, Angelina Jolie, Jessica Alba, Jessica Simpson, Keira Knightley and Halle Berry. But I think that now need to consider a new actress that competes in beauty with all of them, Knights, they present Flora Martínez who from today should be remembered for his excellent work in Rosario Tijeras. And it is not only a beautiful and exuberant women, is also a brilliant actress who captures the protagonist of the film, with such force, justice, accuracy and soul, which makes the film completely credible. A Colombian actress to the fact everything from soap operas, theater in the U.S. and cinema. An actress told as the author of the novel on which is based the tape; "Flora made me feel and believe that she was the real Rosario Tijeras". They say that Rosario is the Queen of Colombia assassins. That he has killed thousands of men. That by killing a man cobra 1,000,000 and bedtime one million and a penny, because like her same says, is more difficult to love to kill. They say that their victims gives them a kiss before killing them, because she believes that any garbage deserves something before you go. They say that he has ever loved. And she said that only half of all this is truth.Based on the successful novel of the same name by author Jorge Franco, Emilio Maillé directs his first feature film after a long list of documentaries produced in different countries including France, where he resides since long ago. Making a profound, moving, heartbreaking though beautiful tape. Shaping life in the slums of the a mythical Medellin, Colombia, where the hope, the love, the passion coexist with violence and misfortune. A complex city captured with all justice and not just as a violent scenario, bajouna excellent picture that it gives us unforgettable images. The well adapted screenplay mixes perfectly the tragedy with a subplot sexy and enjoyable, you come to Rosario and helps you better understand and enjoy the film more. And while the third act is slow and repetitive, the film worth much, supported always with good performances by a multicultural cast consisting of the Colombian Manolo Cardona, Unax Ugalde Spanish and Mexican Rodrigo Oviedo. The single sequence of the ritual in the wake of one of the characters is too memorable to show clearly the Latin way of seeing life and death, a collection of desperate attempts to cover the death feast with joy, crowning the sequence with the incredible and unforgettable the streptease scene. A powerful, strong, tape that moves and it hurts, but strangely becomes love. A sample of that Latin American cinema has much rope for a while. Although the majority of viewers will only be attracted by the erotic poster (in that aspect either, nobody leave disappointed).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4105

Luna

La banda nos visita

muchocine

The directorial debut of Eran Kolirin has already achieved many awards but the most important award that has already garnered is the give the viewer something what thinking and a history of which enjoy.

The journey of a band of musicians of the Egyptian police to Israel serves as a pretext for telling us another trip less concrete and more profound: the journey through the life of each one of the characters. We discovered on the experiences of each one of the characters that many times our history is parallel and similar or can serve as a help to others that we are on the road.Lost in a small Israeli town by various avatars of fate, the charity of some locals make them to spend the night indoors. It happens more in history. Apparently. Because after this surface as simple Eran Kolirin, also author of the screenplay, has managed to count much more in his debut as a film director. With the mastery of the domain of small things, Kolirin tells us about how these musicians influence and feed to the parishioners, and as the lugareñs also influence and make it evolve to these musicians. Ultimately Kolirin focuses on the richness of human relationships and gift us with a small moral: every human being has something to offer us.The actors are well chosen and embroider his interpretation, filled with life sentences of a realistic and careful script.KOLIRIN has opted for a sober realization, without technical fanfare, and with an abundance of flat media and Americans to make more realistic and close this story. Its stylish get hilarious moments and other truly emotional and tender.Hard and rough picture of Shai Goldman that compels us to deepen the apparent harshness of characters to discover his inner garden is also particularly good. It is also very successful (and some truly memorable moments) music composed by Habib Shadah, which immerses us almost without noticing and without stridency in the history.No doubt it's a film that we must not miss in 2008. Not only the viewers are able to appreciate its beauty but that criticism and the juries of many festivals has already awarded numerous awards in this co-production between Israel, France and EE.UU. It has garnered awards of the Academy cinema in Cannes isrealí took the award "A certain regard", its director took the prize for best director revelation at the European film awards, has been the award for best film in Tokyo and in our country got done in 52 international film week of Valladolid with the prize Novel the best director and best screenplay. They are certainly not the only awards that will reap. But from my point of view, the most important award that has already garnered is the give the viewer something what thinking and a history of which enjoy.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2044

Iñaki Bilbao

Zodiac

muchocine

A good movie, very estimable, need to see quiet and calm, unhurried. Otherwise it might seem overly long and somewhat tedious at times.

Very interesting film of intrigue, based on notorious facts, adaptation of the book who wrote one of its protagonists, the cartoonist of the newspaper of San Francisco who became obsessed with the case.Because that is one of the real issues of the film: the obsession.An obsession that led to a human being to unravel one of the greatest mysteries of modern criminal research, of the mysterious serial killer who terrorized San Francisco in late 1960s and first half of the 1970s.Obsession, as shown on the tape, led him to lose family stability and his work as a cartoonist.But he could not stop to know the truth. Up, as he says and is checked at the end of the film: be in front of the murderer, staring him in the eyes. The film is quite good, although it is not, in any way, the masterpiece that is saying there. Fail you and spare you so some things.The best is undoubtedly its beginning and its end. The first half hour, where are three murders (terrible of the Lake), and not only one as recently said an acquaintance, and I suppose, respected national critic (once again spoke a critic in a newspaper without having seen the film, and they go.).And the last is also great half an hour, with the artist as absolute protagonist in his terrifying visit to the former film projectionist, the defendant in prison, and the policeman who led for years the case (here is used, with intelligence, humor).However, there in the middle are many, I would say that too many dialogues, fact that denotes a comprehensive, rigorous and very careful script. A work of impeccable research, however, much longer film. Well, maybe not much, because it is possible to have the appropriate duration which is exposed, but could well be out of history a large number of spectators who action like more than the explanation.Good performances, especially in charge of Robert Downey Jr, which leaves less than what I would have liked to me, I am a fan of him, and John Carroll Lynch as the more than possible suspect. Exquisite setting, acrisolada photography and a wise Assembly, especially in the first and last quarter of the film.In short, a good movie, very estimable, that need to see quiet and calm, unhurried. Otherwise it might seem overly long and somewhat tedious at times.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/987

Jose Luis

Casino Royale

muchocine

A new Bond, one more realistic that will help to keep the saga live for a long time.

From the beginning the new the 007 adventure Casino Royale, you know different, the traditional shot toward the camera that can be seen in all previous tapes in the first few seconds is absent, only to surprise, minutes later, when they tell us the genesis of this shot is to this day the personal brand of the legendary spy. These kinds of surprises this fills the tape number 21 James Bond.Claro that, when you make any move, ends losing something or rediscovering things that one believed lost and that perhaps is what happens with the move that made the producers and director of the film, who give us a new bond, after closing a cycle with another day to dienow is returning to the beginning, on the basis of the first novel written by Ian Fleming on the super agent and presenting us with a bond more young, novice, impulsive and therefore one more human, one that is wrong and that bleeds, as any mortal.The tape begins when Bond completed the requirements to become a 00 agent, i.e. to have licence to kill and he is given his first mission, capture a terrorist who roams somewhere in Africa, which will give you the clue to a banker of terrorists has become a millionaire thanks to acts of terrorism more cruel in recent times, but to stop him, Bond will have to overcome it, not using force, if not their skills for the poker.By what this time, is not surprising, that some of the scenes more weather of the film are carried out on the table in a casino, relying on the work of the actors to create a tension that will keep the Viewer to the edge of your seat, as well as the successful good and intelligent action sequences, that inject you adrenaline to the tape.But perhaps the main ingredient that detonates the exciting adventure is the performance of Daniel Craig, who focuses not only on posing and modeling the esmoking, if not to give to each scene the fair measure, that transforms it a persecutor and murderer beggarly to a seductive, a cynical rival, or a man torn between good and evil and finally lost in the love of a womanso much that it threatens to leave his life of martinis and weapons to one side.Judi Dench as M, this back, printing his style as the head of Bond, willing to keep it at Bay to as place. Eva Green is the Bond girl, who far from being a spy, is an ordinary accountant with the mission to avoid Bond wasted the money from the Government, but with the charm necessary to carry the Spy to his doom.Although the director Martin Campbell, tries to put serious towards the end, lengthening and resulting the third act and thus weakening the closure, succeeds in creating a realistic Ribbon, which away from the action and technological fantasy cheap, gives a new air to the saga, which will undoubtedly help to keep alive for 20 new movies or more.Only left me a question for filmmakers: where the Earth were the silhouettes of naked women in the opening sequence of titles?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/601

Ricardo Marquina

The dead pit

muchocine

I personally recommend it especially because the distressing atmosphere is very well achieved.

Twenty years ago the Chief doctor of a psychiatric hospital discovered that his protege was experiencing extra officially with their patients, creating aberrant monstrosities. The Chief doctor kills his protégé and buried him with his creations in an abandoned wing of the hospital. Time passes, twenty years are nothing, and enter a mysterious girl, suffering from induced amnesia in the hospital. His admission coincides with an earthquake which, coincidentally, opens the pit where the malevolent doctor and their zombies psychopaths have spent the past two decades.Directed by Brett Leonard ("the grass cutter") this film of 1989, called Spain "The pit of death", meets all the premises to spend a slum night and poligonera in our favorite sofa. Hilarious characters, ochentera aesthetics, music in the purest style Out Run, zombies destripa innocent, gore, occasional, cruel and wasteful, bad very bad, hero and a pretty girl that corretea in panties almost the entire film.The "buts"? the Serie-B classic: poor production, objectionable interpretations, implausible, and hackneyed argument dubbing insultante.ya know. That Yes, this her recommend personally, especially by the distressing atmosphere is very well achieved, making us give some other start in our Throne. hooks and orangeade for all!

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1622

Ramón Besonias

El último rey de Escocia

muchocine

In the heart of darkness. While we hope that another future movie amend the flat, I stay with the less histrionic, but much more the quiet American, Philip Noyce adult...

Some calling southern Lebanon of biopic? that extended term applied to the genre that recreates (and recreating) in the life of more or less famous characters for the popular imagination - the last King of Scotland, name that we disclose, for those who still have not seen the film, as entirely misguided, although pityingly where. The last King of Scotland scales around the passive (but main) character that plays much soulless unknown James MacAvoy, a Scottish doctor who comes to Uganda? fled the ties of her aristocratic family - willing to help the impoverished people in a bleak hospital (except for the more than obvious attractions of this kind of Lady Chatterley, performed by ex-teniente Scully), and just particular doctor to dictator Idi Amin (a prodigious Whitaker) and privileged witness of their desaguisados.And isn't that why not continue taking one final of having attended a biopic printing. Seems it, but rather because the interpretation of Whitaker overshadows all film matter close to miles away. This actor is that he comes and scares, I I assure you. But even though the defects of casting or script have reappointing the rest, the last King of Scotland raises more as a trip to the interior of the darkness surrounding the terrifying Ugandan dictator, and by extension, to all dictatorial power which, as a black hole, absorbs and devours his baffled Court of Marauders which Saturno. In fact, the film is based on a novel by the British writer Giles Foden and half portrays his experiences and impressions during his long stay in Uganda (lived there from age five).Who does not remember, Idi Amin came to power in 1971 through a coup d ' état against Milton Obote corrupt. He found support from numerous countries and media, which saw in him the hope to become a prosperous country, Uganda and of course away from communism of its predecessor (as worrying for the US Government). But soon revealed that the lamb was a wolf of sharp teeth: was murdering his political enemies and obsessed with persecutory Manias and paranoid visions. The height of the absurd happens when, before the stunned eyes of the international community, the country expelled 50,000 Asians, putting against their neighbours, or offering help in the kidnapping of an Airbus of the airline company Air France by members of the Organization for the liberation of Palestine. It is then when the stories (terrifying all) on their folly they multiply between exiles and carried Amin to exile in Saudi Arabia. He will still die in 2003 without a trial to restore the dignity of civilian victims left by the way.The film outline, through the role of each character, different political positions before the excess of the dictator. From the marriage of doctors wary by experience of any salvapatrias with pretensions of Redeemer, to the pragmatic and skeptical British Ambassador, who criticizes with cynicism the inertia of the people while maintaining their privileged position of neocolonizador; and going through the idealistic but hopeful work of the ill-fated Minister of health, or the suicide need for peace of the doctor of the hospital.But it is in the character of the Scottish where the film could have come out of a mediocrity that places between the varied lot of similar products on the fascination by the luminous fabric that adorns and disguises the power. An excellent interpretation is not enough when the weight of the fabric weighs on the figure of the disciple, (not so unconscious) aspiring teen viewer of false political honesty of Amin. The young and intelligent doctor, Nicholas Garrigan, looms as a child's father, shot out of the oppressive arms of his family (all doctors by inheritance genetic, I guess), to live with uppercase and eat snacks a world unknown and choose randomly, as all the options that are presented during the film. His unconsciousness and superficial way will make you an accomplice of a political regime believed honest and exciting not for deep ideals, but by the inertia of their own need for new sensations. Why is left as soon entice with the treats offered by the dictator, and why nail without shame its bajeras in the exotic bones of one of the concubines, boring by domestic exile to which her husband her subject. It is almost incredible, or at least unlikely, that suddenly he awakens his conscience and realizes the Kennel that has gotten. The script? in which incidentally coparticipa Peter Morgan (lyricist of the wonderful and fresh The Queen) - makes us sneak this awakening the tragic and terrible death of the concubine, accelerating developments towards its unusual and final, only tolerable Hollywood as imperfect metaphor of the consequences of the interventionist policy made in USA.The character that plays Gillian Anderson is presented as well as the other side of the emotional and political currency which could (but was not) choose if it had been in the hospital in the town. In a final scene to see how the character of the Scottish young aims (as if a ghost were) the bus in which the young doctor runs away from a dangerous for anyone who will be foreign Uganda. But it is late. Even late to believe us that end only suitable for bad so-called solidarity film loving blind.While we hope that another future movie amend the flat, I stay with the less histrionic, but much more the quiet American, Philip Noyce adult. And of course with the unique and implacable gardener, of Fernando Meirelles. Incidentally, a recommendable soundtrack.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2537

Rafa Ferrer

Cuestión de pelotas

muchocine

What the film is entertaining, the trouble is that most of the fun points over and over again shown them in trailers

Very curious is that in the USA they of sports and!He hala time-tested film on the subject! Well, is that in the magazine TIME devoted you a cover to the "Dodgball" which is nothing more and nothing less than that game so stupid that all have played once when we were small in the courtyard of the school and of course, producers eager for films, in this 2004 who walks a little short film, decided to make a film on the subject.Ben Stiller think that he makes films like hotcakes and I wonder will this man out of the sets have their own life? her Vince Vaughn has starred along with his colleague from fatigue (that bad I like this guy from the remake of "Psycho") resulting in the typical movie to see with friends with a few cans of beer and pizzas and debt of the cinema of the Farrelly brothers (scatological humor and cochinote) to 120% what the tape is to entertain, the trouble is that most of the fun points over and over again shown them in trailers (asi) (if you have already seen these you have seen the best of the film).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4162

Berto

Alien vs Predator 2

muchocine

Film of remarkable entertainment, which exceeds in length to its loose first part giving the viewer what he wants and preached with the title of the film and that augurs a new series of films of this already new franchise.

Everything pointed relative disaster that was the first installment of what can now be considered a new saga would not get get a second installment of this confrontation between two of the alien races more deadly and at the same time most interesting film mythology of all time. The case is that although I do not like neither critics nor to public, above all by its zero resemblance to the series of comics from which drinks its sources, keeping more than any film of two sagas which it joins, or what is the same, if it gives sufficient benefits squeeze it until that is nothing to remove. For this second part already not told with the director of the first part, Paul W.S Anderson, immersed in the direction of the third installment of the Resident Evil, left his post to the Brothers Strause, special effects experts and promised to satisfy the fans with what all had expected, clashes between the two races, human dead everywhere and a story that could remind a bit to origin of the history of the comic.On the basis of these premises must be said that in this case the directors have right of full, because that is what we offer in this film, a small village in the deep America, full of bait for two races, and all this seasoned by fights between the aliens and predator that comes to hunt them.The argument begins exactly where just the top, although no need seeing to find out what happens. After the introduction to put us in a situation, the film focuses on introducing us to the protagonists, typical archetypes among which we will find the Sheriff of the town, the rebel of the people back after being in jail for something that did and trying to redirect to his younger brother, which follows the same steps. We also have, as no, aunt buenorra that at one point in the film you will need to remove clothing (foreground endless of his included rear) for enjoyment of the hormonado Viewer that clutter the room, and as opposed to this stereotype also have out there the military who returns to his home to try to continue with their lives. Obviously throughout the life of the people is threatened by the arrival of the Aliens, which camparan rampant at the city, eating and using to raise all the humans that are on the way, while the predator because there is only one, the alone is enough to put an end to all, try by all means to take forward an aberration created by nothing more start the moviea Predalien, fruit of the events of the first film.Starting from there to go to the movies knowing exactly what we are going to see, the film not disappointed in no time, has some very good special effects, and the truth is a joy to see how campan rampant land at these two creatures. The only bad thing that could highlight is that the action scenes are mostly very hastily shot and from very closely, which means that in the majority of the fights, you only get to distinguish a mass report of arms, blades, tails and braids, and that until that not a bit away the camera fails know what is exactly happening in the fight.Actors therefore quite Jessi, and that for a film of these features this pretty well. There is no any moderately known, with what is clearly the protagonists are exclusively those that give the title to the film.Ultimately, film of remarkable entertainment, which exceeds in length to its loose first part and that augurs well for a new series of films, under so well that it has worked around the world, and that if improve a little more formulates it can get a very interesting film especially for both Aliens and predators fansamong which I myself.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2351

Alvaro Oliva

Oceans 13

muchocine

That nobody intends to find stories or transcendental themes?Ocean´s thirteen? It is what it is, pure entertainment accompanied by a gang of big and famous actors, surrounded by luxury, money and much picaresque.

Steven Soderbergh is back with the third part of the adventures of Danny Ocean and his. On this occasion, the boys of George Clooney have the mission to avenge the honour of his colleague Reuben at nothing less than Al Pacino. To this "Godfather", so together we return to see familiar faces, including fellow of mafia and range as Andy Garcia. The feminine touch is borne by the always interesting and suggestive Ellen Barkin.Sin more objective than trying to settle scores with Pacino, boys (and Soderbergh) give us a film entertaining, in which we can contemplate its different tricks to carry out its mission.Different scenes that show different situations, some of them with great comic content as the stage in the Mexican factory and the revolt which is organized, or stormy stay responsible for giving the score to the casino. That nobody intends to find stories or transcendental themes, "Ocean´s thirteen" is what it is, pure entertainment accompanied by a gang of big and famous actors, surrounded by luxury, money and much picaresque.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/278

Tito Chinchan

Los managers

muchocine

Nice comedy to see without more pretensions than the spend a good time with great scenes and tremendous nonsense

Wow, that fear of film. Nothing more and nothing less that Fran Perea, teenage singer-songwriter ja, ja, ja (just kidding) and Paco León, supported by two side classic Spanish cinema, Enrique Villén and Fran Tallafé. Not be as I'm daring to see Spanish film. And the fact is that then we see beads of having a good time as the Calentito, but in others we collide with the sides of the bed and its child melon and have to run. That uncertainty over bad. Anyway, luckily here Sancho Gracia and María Jiménez, that sure loose some bastez.The film is about Maca and Rena, two cuarentones without profession or benefit that seeking to make the pitch that we all dream in life. By a twist of fate, they try to access the programme of Lauren Postigo, which does not leave them enter, but where they discover that the good in this life is to be the manager of the artist. So they are with two kids (roll tow) that have good paint. These are Pipo and David, Paco León and Fran Perea respectively. So join in a strange Quartet, dragging on summer terraces and bingos, until that they encounter "La Rota" (María Jiménez) who sees something special in them.Well, it's with the Spanish films should grab with smoking paper. Let's see, the film is the easy divertimento we like around here. Drugs, sympathetic types, easy tune, sex (more real insunuado), strange scripts, etc. And this has it all. The beginning is very promising, given that there are good actors. The problem is that, throughout Spanish film who boasts, have a moment of Supreme stupidity all give us telling it's patriotic film. And the truth that tired. Damn, have to Sancho Gracia, María Jiménez, two major luxury, much material to put them in the rubbish of the American military base. That should not be, man. Incidentally, since I liked, given that it is of facilitator them, that you sit and you see with a giggle in the mouth. Up even sticks a canutito to be in line with the theme.In short, nice comedy to see without more pretensions than the spend a good time with great scenes and tremendous nonsense.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4293

Jaime Martínez

This is England

muchocine

Excellent suggestive and honest portrait of England in the 1980s. We see the progressive personal and cultural maturation of a boy of 12 years that will lead to a change of innocence to experience.

Excellent suggestive and honest portrait of England in the 1980s. Under the context of the depressed English political situation, where the war of the Maldives has ended a few months ago and Margaret Thatcher continued to rule with an iron, a 12-year-old boy hand feels welcome in a peculiar group of youth of the movement skinhead who then began to spread in the districts of England. British, very committed to the story, director has managed to reflect perfectly the life of a child rejected at school and accepted by a skinhead group. Pure social English film far removed from which we are accustomed always controversial Ken Loach. Divided into two parts, the first comic and made to perfection after a brilliant presentation of the characters, and a second which nests too in the drama and social realism to affect the sensitive vein of the Viewer; It keeps the interest thanks to the simplicity with which the director will little by little humming all the elements of the film and at the same time we see the progressive personal and cultural maturation of a boy of 12 years that will lead to a change of innocence to experience. Are you missing face the absence of some major characters in the face at the end of the film where its history disappears and does not return to know nothing more than them; as well as the mother figure, passing on tiptoe to the physical and psychological transformation of his son. Special mention deserves the small actor Thomas Turgoose (winner of the best actor award novel of 2006 British Independent Awards) that makes the film at all times and a - too - sobreactuado Stephen Graham as a racist skinhead. Social and human x-ray full of drama, with a strong and crude picture of England in the 1980s. Excellent atmosphere, music and interpretation for a tape that will like to stakeholders by social issues and its human background. With some of the best initial credit titles I've seen this last year (as well as the music that runs through all the footage), This is England, well-deserved winner of the award for best film at the British Independent Awards, becomes a pleasure for the senses and one of the 15 best films of 2007.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/479

Alberto Concepción

King Kong

muchocine

And if this film is memorable for something, it's to make us believe the unbelievable, or at least come to understand the feelings are trying to convey

The morning after the night in which the return of the King won 11 Oscars, Peter Jackson was already preparing the pre-production of King Kong. The classical version of this film was seen by Jackson when he was 8 years old, and since then has been obsessed with the topic. Once achieved fame (and money) enough so the producer of turn him bend everything I like, he decided to make the film "in his way" (recall that years ago, before the Lord of the Rings trilogy, the project began but eventually cancelled for frustration of Jackson).The result was nothing more (and nothing less) than a real waste of digital technique, a considerably long (around 3 hours) movie in which action and feelings are mixed leaving a product, at least, memorable.The beginning of the film focuses on tell us how are the characters that appear in the film. We are in New York, at the time of the great depression, and we find Ann Darrow (Naomi Watts), an actress that is left without work, to which known by "chance" filmmaker Carl Denham (Jack Black), whom the producers intend to leave without continuing the filming of his movie. This offers you the role of the actress to Darrow once the initial abandoned the project, and both embark, with Jack Driscol (Adrien Brody), which is the screenwriter of the film of Denham, another actor and his team on a journey through the ocean to a hidden Island, uninhabited suspected. And all this, unbeknownst to him none of the passengers of the ship.Arriving at the island, Darrow is kidnapped by some natives, that offer as a sacrifice to a huge creature, our "Dear" gorilla Kong, no doubt, main protagonist of the film. All decide to go in search of Miss Darrow, especially Driscoll, who has started an affair. The problem is that our Kong is also in love with Miss Darrow. At first glance the argument is unlikely to us, however, Jackson manages to make us believe possible. The detail with which has done to Kong, a huge beast of more than 8 meters, is worthy of praise. The gestures, the looks. they manage to make us, as it progresses the film on the skin of the Gorilla: makes us (almost) believe that he is a person.The search for Miss Darrow occupies almost half of the film, and is full of action scenes, which really come to be heavy due to the continuous succession of bugs of all kinds (from centipede mutant dinosaurs, bats or huge slugs), and shortly after to the respite that leave. These are fights and more fights of all kinds between Kong struggling to save Darrow from the clutches of the dinosaurs, or the rest of characters against insects and other animals of enormous proportions. Without doubt, the movie could have been made shorter not including these scenes, than at a single point get tired.The interpretation of Naomi Watts is quite right, although it is not extraordinary. Jack Black, despite being known for comedy roles, manages to get into the role and fulfil its responsibilities as greedy and self-centered filmmaker who thinks only of money and the success of his film. Adrien Brody also get approved in its action, but neither is the role given to more showcasing of this great actor. The rest of characters not noted none above another, although the presence of Jamie Bell (Jimmy in the film), actor remembered for being the child of "Billy Elliot" deserves special mention. The rest of the cast is composed by Thomas Kretschmann (Captain Englehorn), Colin Hanks - son of Tom Hanks-(Preston), Kyle Chandler (Bruce Baxter) and Andy Serkis (who already played Gollum in the Lord of the rings) "interprets" again to Kong (in addition to the Cook of the ship).The recreation of the New York of the great depression is excellent, the scenes of action are very successful, although at times too much computer technique, as I have said before, tired. The picture is very good (could not be less having shot the film in New Zealand) and recall levels, and how to shoot that much to the Lord of the rings, because Peter Jackson has since put his signature on the screen with their magnificent "typical" displacements of camera. And if outside little, Jackson added a few touches of humor to the film, that far from being absurd, or extent, make more fun viewing.By the end I left Kong, who, as I mentioned earlier, is the true protagonist of the film. Not been few spectators at the end of the film have felt grief and sadness by the well-known unfortunate outcome for the gorilla. At the beginning it shows the beast, the animal, but over the course of the film, we get (and the work of Jackson has much to say in this) see their more human side, their sentimientos.y understand them, even put us in his place, and get to wanting to make him "who gets the girl". Such is the point to which arrives (again, within the implausible history), there are several scenes between the own Kong and Ann Darrow, great feeling.And if this film is memorable for something, it's to make us believe the unbelievable, or at least come to understand the feelings are trying to convey. And to achieve this on an animal that is nothing more than a huge Gorilla, was made by Peter Jackson.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2646

Jesus Lens

Ratatouille

muchocine

?Ratatouille? It is a beautiful song to tolerance, understanding and coexistence, peaceful and creative, with a finish so superb that rarely has given me so much punishment is completed a film and the cinema lights are lit.

"It was created out of necessity." Because it is a way of understanding life, live and express themselves. "As a chef I don't understand my work without investigating, inquire into the restless spirit that defines the human being."Writes it this Quique Dacosta, factotum of El Poblet, one of the most famous restaurants in our country and, by extension, in the whole world. But if they ask him, sure that his words would be subscribed by the very Gousteau, the celebrated Parisian chef with name of submarine commander and gastronómico-revolucionarios desires.And, of course, would be subscribed by Remy, the protagonist of this masterpiece entitled "Ratatouille" rat. And well write "rat" because the protagonist of the last Pixarada not in a nice little mouse, a sympathetic Micky Mouse or a cute Hamster. No. The protagonist of this film is a rat hairy, ugly and repulsive. What shows that Pixar does not be walking with nonsense or with half-measures, which should be very clear ideas and a self-confidence bomb-proof for the arriesgadísima decision to become the protagonist of a film to a rat.Having said which, pay once to the wonderful story of "Ratatouille" and kneel before a film that is prodigious from his boot, old-style of the wildest cartoons of hinojos? this adorable snowing kills - the sequence of the flight of rats by underground channels, pure adrenaline unleashed. And, later, the tenderness. And the message about radical otherness, on the claim of the other, which is different. And on the value, the recognition, the love for the well done work, the love for the craft, the recovery of children, solidarity, family, teamwork.It is incredible what has "Ratatouille". And, above all, it is incredible how account you. It is a narrative prodigy. And the ability to convey emotions. And that Paris, more real than the truth. And that kitchen, these stews that can practically smell. And these side. And those winks. And the perfect combination of humor, love, friendship, passion, anger, etc. And these rats. Let us not forget those rats who run, climb, jump and climb. Some rats that sometimes give disgust, sometimes cause laughter. And tenderness. And, above all, respect. Respect for all those beings that being different, are there. On our side. On the floor of the side. In the bar where breakfast. In the streets that we walk. "Ratatouille" is a beautiful hymn to tolerance, understanding and coexistence, peaceful and creative, with a finish so superb that rarely has given me so much punishment is completed a film and the cinema lights are lit.The question is simply, when it comes out on DVD Edition for collectors?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1250

Yojimbo

Deseando amar

muchocine

A love story late, accidental and prohibited. Rather, autoprohibida, which can be the greatest difficulty that you find.

They had told me that if a love story not viewed Brokeback Mountain, I would not for love. Before this ruling categorically and agorera, someone with whom I agree (surprisingly) in cinematographic tastes, recommended me this film fervently. Already had in mind to see some of the so revered Wong Kar Wai, but their enthusiasm (and because I usually trust his opinion) managed to give him some preference.Since or for one or for another.Love is a game director. Initially, the accuracy of the Mise en scène, the presentation of characters and bases envelope which is going to spin the story are put on the table in an exemplary manner, but to the 28 minute film is confusing and it takes many turns without giving clues. From a dinner, the film becomes subtle and great excitement: play love, rebuild a love, interpret sequences of a relationship that was not warned and in which there were two victims who have joined. Both live a love caused by an infidelity. But they have in mind not be as Adulterers who have joined them. This will be a problem. As big as the love they profess.I can understand that this movie is of those films that you hate or worship. And that they make a director at one of worship or in any rule author. I I'm in the middle and do not intend to pay tribute to neither sink nor the film director with permission of both recommendations (who loved the film). Do not liked anything tics of the director, getting fades to black every few minutes, carrying out sweeps in an intimate sequence, getting musical moments sometimes meaningless and that they remembered moments "El Corte Inglés"? ICT style I took off much of what narraba.¿A their favor? It is a late, accidental and forbidden love story. Rather, autoprohibida, which can be the greatest difficulty that you find.If I have to stay with some of the film is the phrase of the female character: "Paying attention you realize things." That is why some don't notice many, although we carry sunglasses.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4208

Victor Bilbao

Cold Mountain

muchocine

"Cold Mountain" is a pleasure for the eyes as well as ears because there are precious of great lyricism dialogs, although they alternate with the brutality and cruelty of the war, any war.

It could Mountain is a small but beautiful place of the South of the Unidos.Todo States the world is very attached. One day arrives a new pastor with his daughter, a beautiful woman. He falls and is met by a young handsome and hardworking.The hardly speaks so not given well.When they are about to reach more, he must go to war that has occurred between the North and the South. Before leaving, she gives her a book and a photograph of him. It will always take it with him. "Wounded in the war it desertará to return with her, who is undergoing economic hardship because of the damn war."You've told me that barely days after he remembered his name. "Oh, Inman, more than three years have passed and I still remember his name."Beautiful and unforgiving film anti-war framed at the time of the American civil war, although it might well have happened in any other place and time.Renée Zellweger fell the Charles Frazier book because there was many twigs to make a great film and endorses a role Bonbon. Moreover. And Anthony Minghella has done so.Directed with master hand, with a spectacular mise en scene thanks to a beautiful compositions with great depth of field, a superb photograph that highlights the rugged places in Romania where shots were filmed foreign (most), and some brilliant performances, especially intense of Jude Law and Renee Zellweger, without forgetting to Nicole Kidman.El film walk with steady at all times handstopping when you have to stop and being strong and agile when the situation requires. Thus, one might think that it has an irregular rhythm, but it is not true.It has the pace at which the various events that will occur when the protagonist ask and even require. "And if it is long, that is more defect that can be found, because it tells the long and difficult journey of a hamano until you reach home, and that requires time to tell.""Cold Mountain" is an excellent western with elements of various genres within it, not little recalls to the quest of the hero Ulysses on his trip to his beloved Itaca, where his beloved Penelope awaits. "In addition to all of this is appreciated the large amount of excellent actors involved in the film, even in very small roles.""Cold Mountain" is a pleasure for the eyes as well as ears because there are precious of great lyricism dialogs, although they alternate with the brutality and cruelty of the war, any war (in this sense is particularly significant the episode of Nathalie Portman).An excellent film that never ceases to be an impressive story that leaves honda footprint.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/613

Yul B.

El laberinto del fauno

muchocine

I am a rare bug between such excellence, but I risk to say with sincerity and respect the rest of criticism, that this film has disappointed me quite, at the risk of having to leave the country and go into hiding.

I have overwhelmed all the criticisms circulating in blogs, portals and forums moviegoers referring to this film. Her they describe as "masterpiece", "risky", "the best film of Guillermo del Toro", or "it is going to be the winner of the 2007 Oscar for best film of non-English speaking safe". And as to the interpretations of its actors, rise them to the category of "great" or "sublime", with an unforgettable Sergi López. I am a rare bug between such excellence, but I risk to say with sincerity and respect the rest of criticism, that this film I quite disappointed.Am assuming that the promotion of the tape (Jesus said be trailers) is totally misleading. It only shows the fantastic part of the story, forgetting (can that intentionally) what really reflected in this film: a passage in the history with a capital of Spain, specifically after the civil war, "softened" with a tale of fairies, princesses and strange creatures. Up the same poster of the film confuses with those letters in the "Harry Potter" style.Ultimately, that to really find out what the film, and it does not lead to deception, was essential to have read at least before the first paragraphs of the official synopsis. After reading the rest of this overview, we will be a global idea of what features the film, although we continue to believe that this is a fantasy story located in a clever and different way at a turbulent time in Spanish history.Nothing further from the truth. Who go to see this movie is going to find with the umpteenth and charisma film about the war Spanish Civil (explicit miseries included), in which for scarcely half an hour of the two that lasts us transports to a fanciful and unreal world as cruel and interested as the real world which is reflected in it. For some parents, abstain from taking your children to see her because of child there's nothing.Promotional deceptions aside, I think that this film has been short for expectations. It is true that the picture and music are very good, and the script is acceptable, but Guillermo del Toro is able to create fantastic worlds best and more far-reaching than that seen in?The Laberinto del Fauno?. Having to deal only in 120 minutes two complex stories, reality and fantasy, although related, it is only possible to be brief, rapid and direct, so should not be excessively extend in flourishes.Perhaps it would have been more effective, and even dramatic, that the fantasy world that we see it would have locked up more footage and had traveled roads more edulcorados than the one shown, to create a strong contrast with the real world, represented in a very cruel, violent and bloody way. But of course, then this product not had signed of the Toro.En regards the main cast of the film, for my taste include interpretations of Ivana Baquero, the girl protagonist (although in some scenes may seem a bit repellent), the of Maribel Verdú (in the incredible line of his later works, this time with appropriate thin) and Alex Angulo, although the latter has had other work with better results. The Ariadna Gil seems very normalita, pulling to mediocre, and that of Doug Jones, as the Faun, adds nothing new.In regards to Sergi López, here I going to throw around my neck: the encounter significant but not remarkable. Its interpretation is based in the visual, and in this regard, López has built an evil sadistic, bloodthirsty and unscrupulous; But why we cannot think that you it's the best villain in the history of the Spanish cinema.The evil is reflected in other aspects, and when Captain Vidal did not commit atrocities which explicitly teaches us, the character is portrayed correctly, as one among all.By cash, qualify this film of "regular", at the risk of having to leave the country and go into hiding.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/341

Yul B.

Piratas del Caribe 2

muchocine

Authentic adventure film that, although it slightly resembles the first installment and weakens in its infancy, will leave you wanting more. The third part of the saga is expected to be presented.

I am sure that more than one crucificará me by what I say below, though I hope a bit of indulgence.Going beyond: the film has seemed very good, but I only liked his second hour and quarter. The first 75 minutes found me very weak for the expected (and desired). For this reason I will divide my criticism in two very different parts, as it is the hour (and fourth) valued.Before that it was appropriate to recall what the argument of "Pirates of the Caribbean: the chest of the dead man": the Hunter pirates Lord Cutler Beckett (Tom Hollander) of the East India Trading Company, and Captain Jack Sparrow (Johnny Depp) are obsessed about the so-called dead man chest. According to legend, who possesses this chest can control terrifying pirate Davy Jones (Bill Nighy), the master of the depths of the sea. This precious object, Beckett intends to exterminate until the last pirate of the Caribbean and dominate the port trade, with Sparrow tries to get rid of the debt that has slope with Jones to avoid doomed until eternity to a life in his service. Both used to Will Turner (Orlando Bloom) and Elizabeth Swann (Keira Knightley) to achieve his goal. But to reach the chest it is necessary to overcome numerous dangers that none ever would have imagined.The story about the role is promising; However, once implemented, it sank by the bow, and insulting and spectacular floats by the stern. The first hour and a quarter.The (inevitable) need to chain the first installment of the franchise with the second, and the excessive length which has been used for this, has seriously harmed this part of the tape, which the continuity between both films seem forced.In the majority of the aftermath, it is vital to remind the viewer how and what are the characters of the original tape to place them on the new plot. Sometimes, the temporal difference between the release of the original film and its sequel or sequels is minimal (one-year or maximum year and a half), with which the Viewer remembers perfectly to those characters, and therefore the footage you need to use to place them on the new adventure is reduced.However, in this case, has been roughly 3 years between: the curse of the Black Pearl and the chest of the dead man; so, it was inevitable to refresh the memory to the public about the previous adventures of Jack Sparrow, Will Turner and Elizabeth Swann. Unless one has spent the DVD of the first installment of both see it, or one of those fans that has embraced the Caribbean pirates Marathon organized by several cinemas in the country (project two films consecutively).But did not require that memory be extended both. During the first sixty minutes they are remembered and cited events in the first film in a way too spaced. Once reached the 75 initial minutes, approximately, it is when really begins the new adventure.On the other hand, there are too many preliminary. I guess that it is that in this second installment is already have three devoted Hollywood stars, namely Johnny Depp, Orlando Bloom and Keira Knightley, while the first only was Depp. Therefore, the producers of the film and its director Gore Verbinski have been forced to to more pitch them all, so their corresponding fans can enjoy more each of them.For all that I have explained above, this part of the tape becomes eternal, and one becomes impatient waiting to see when the action begins.The second hour and a quarter.Here is where the tomato starts. Spectacular, disturbing, with pace and many surprises I can not reveal.This is what I wanted to see I (and surely more than one of you) during the footage.In this part of the film been tapped absolutely everything that could give this new adventure. And, on top, has been reserved for this time the best, and most impressive and amazing movie: the KRAKEN, a giant octopus that sweeps any ship in which Jack Sparrow is found (or anything of his clothing).I have been fascinated this second hour and a quarter. He didn't want to end. And above, has a piece of end, who you going to fall back. Surprise perfect to link to the third (and final?) installment of the Pirates of the Caribbean, and that leaves you wanting more, and more, and still more.By this second time I put the film a rating of "very good".And by the interpretations of all actors throughout the film. You can not forget any of the main: Johnny Depp is the genuine and authentic Jack Sparrow. I do not see any other actor to moving ahead with this role with both success and genius. Although we already know very well the character, and this causes you to lose the magic of his discovery, Depp continues on the same line of interpretation that has enshrined as one of the most relevant, eccentric and influential Hollywood actors. Without him this film would be quite another.Orlando Bloom goes one step further in his career to consider him as an outstanding interpreter. The role of Will Turner has expanded and has allowed to deploy their various interpretative facets (which from what I've seen are quite a few and surprisingly varied). Mix the moments of drama and comedy with great skill, and that has favoured to be recognized as the great movie Heartthrob, beating the classics.Keira Knightley is attractive, sensual and the time, very warlike. Her role as Elizabeth Swann has also expanded and increased number of scenes have been given for herself; so he has been able to take advantage of them, and he has shown his talent of actress with grace and passion.But is that the rest of the cast is equally superb: Bill Nighy as the terrifying Davy Jones, even though his face is full of tentacles; Tom Hollander as Lord Cutler Beckett ruthless; and, as no, Kevin McNally, in its magnificent line as the Gibbs inseparable companion of Sparrow, and the crazy couple of pirates formed by Lee Arenberg (Pintel) and Mackenzie Crook (Ragetti), now more witty and wacky. And some others that I intentionally left unnamed to not reveal surprises.In short, a genuine adventure film that, although it slightly resembles the first installment and weakens in its infancy, will leave you wanting more. The third part of the saga is expected to be presented.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/6

Victor Trujillo

La casa de cera

muchocine

Offal, terror and wax to equal parts

After insufferable first half an hour, House of wax begins to heat, never better said, and we start to "delight" with al gore most disgusting horror I've seen long ago. It is the beginning of the movie, with a few characters more flat than the brain scanner of Mariah Carey and an American spark laugh laughing your Juanito Navarro. House of wax begins to take shape after 40 minutes more or less when one of the dumb blonde of the group comes to track the bad smell in the forest. The start becomes grotesque and surreal when after out of a quagmire of blood which she herself could have come perfectly, the boys find a hand buried between the sangraza and the skins. Then makes appearance in the movie the third brother slaughterer with cheroki tuneao shit until the flag, a role that the minds of thinking bineuronal will soon identify as "the bad guy".Until that time the movie is rather laugh than terror. But it gets serious when appear in scene the two brothers of the ghost town, and the scenes are becoming increasingly more intense as al gore and a few details that I leave you descubráis.Fuck me mareé when one of them pronounced famously said "don't worry, we're going to get out," not you the Miss because that scene is really acojonante. As also acojonante is when burning the House of wax that by what I have understood in the shooting was wax of truth, something noted in screen.Anyway, that when sales of the film is appreciated and you don't know if re-submitted to your worst enemy or return to see her but without cover your face lol

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/193

Leuzor

El código Da Vinci

muchocine

After seeing the film you won't want to learn more about Da Vinci nor of his works

There is no give much back to the plot: Robert Langdom is a scholar of the old symbolism and is entangled in the murder of the teacher of the Priory by Opus Dei, behind hide many intrigues on the offspring of Jesus and the dark intentions of the Iglesia.La film fails to arouse the interest of the viewer or much less aspires to become a "taquillazo" and is that pace becoming boring at times and when it loses accelerates gives you time to process and understand what it is trying to show. He simply drowned in expectations and in famita of the "Da Vinci Code".Robert Langdom "Hanks" starts the film with an audiciencia presenting religious symbols to demonstrate that many things are not what they seem to be asking what this symbol? and when you try to think no time because less than half a second to the answers already are listed. And Sophie remains Amelie a simple spectator. To escape the plane SILAS not protest-no one remembers lost friends. At least his grandfather was not his grandfather.After seeing the movie, you won't want to learn more about Da Vinci nor of his works.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2477

Iñaki Bilbao

La suerte de Emma

muchocine

Sober melodrama that perfectly combines the drama and humor.

Nice love story between an attractive campesina needed money, and a desperate man who knows will not live long cancer afflicting.The film is entertaining at all times thanks to a smart script, great performances and an impeccable technical work.The music is pretty (beautiful final credit titles song), and photography is beautiful.The footage is the ideal, containing love, pain, sadness and tenderness, well dose and combined.The characters are endearing, especially police pretender of the protagonist.Its end, however, is very predictable, as it is known from the beginning, always, is clear, that is know to add two and two. Although, certainly, this is not the most important thing or impede the good work carried out until then. Everything is emotional and tender and thus be no wonder, is very beautiful, dignified and honest, leaving a very taste. It was long, almost until the end of the Festival of Donostia, leading the audience award.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/144

Jorge

Cache Escondido

muchocine

The videos are "the gaze of the other", the "other" us spy and frightens us

Rare film for us Argentines, that we do not have on hand so the problems of racial discrimination as some European countries but does not seem to casual to appear today, after the conflict in the French suburbs. In this way, the film can be interpreted as an allegory. Placing us: what are the videos? What role play and what they can represent for this family? The videos are "the gaze of the other". The "other" us spy and frightens us, we do not know from where and what he sees or what he saw.The fear arises from guilt of the protagonist and his wife, in the allegory is the white, wealthy and bourgeois, society front to the "other", to the marginalized of African origin living in the suburbs. The first indication gives it almost Street fight with the young black rider in terms of delivering a beating to the protagonist, who after insults and bluster, opt to avoid the lawsuit with a request for forgiveness by the wife. The second clue is the distrust of the white boy to his mother. There are several others. Note all developing a suffocating atmosphere, which is why is not, as it is not the "other" which filmed, but that is always present and his presence is felt. The white family does not want to have the "other"; her distracted from their chores of your life which you are entitled, he intimidated, but the State, the police, can not help to remove it off porque.el "Other" he hasn't done anything. There is no reason for the police to intervene. If there is an aggressor, it is the protagonist. Drawings remind the child conflict between the white and the Algerian, where there was a perdidoso and a winner. Who loses is the Algerian, son of those who came to post-war Europe to work on the reconstruction and remained there as kelpers, as second-class citizens. This generation was lost, had no education for economic integration and the result is clear to see in the small, squalid Department Majid, in contrast to the cold and comfortable housing in the white family. Majid grew up to his son without resentment or oblivion but could not survive the depression of its marginalized generation that saw progress, comfort and culture? from the outside. His death becomes effective in front of his child executioner. His blood is mixed, is confused with the Rooster which earned him expulsion of the House of culture and progress. The Rooster? the French Rooster announcing tomorrow, progress and advancement. dies degollado like Majid, whose parents were killed in the Seine by whites during the conflict with Algeria. There was no progress, there was no integration for them, only death; gallo did not sing for them. Does the final scene shows the children of actors out of the school, talking? That could solve the enigma of the videos and can be a new Rooster that sings for both, always and when they go together to the school; always let the other be another one another alien, faced, but that recognizes it as equal part of a society still indebted.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/419

Ana

Clerks 2

muchocine

As this film says a lot without going beyond, and it can only be valuable if you see by what it is and you laugh much.

I saw a couple of years later released, as you must see Clerks: video and with friends. This film not impressive by its cinematography, but by the pace of his dialogues and his humor. Two guys that they are not going anywhere and twelve years later we have the second part. Definitely not to be seeing Clerks to appreciate this, but it is ideal.While these guys are not models to emulate they have incredible conversations and a sense of the peculiar humour. Of course they speak mostly about sex with morbidity and deviations, but also on film. On the difference between grow with the mythology of Star Wars versus the story of the Lord of the rings. Only by that comment worth throughout the film. Kevin Smith manages to satirize his characters without reducing them, why is a sincere reflection on life and not a mockery.It has moments that are perhaps too sugary and sentimentalistas, but who knows needs them to withstand ametralladoramente funny from the rest. Although it may not seem it say something about live in mediocrity, and change the romantic dreams by sensible things. Love and friendship is based on another person to be able to see you as you are and capture your essence. As this film says a lot without going beyond, and it can only be valuable if you see by what it is and you laugh much.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1147

Tito Chinchan

El truco final (The Prestige)

muchocine

Long film about the goings of wizards, it would be surprising if simply incredibly had translated the original title. Even so, the final product is of very high quality, despite the slippages in the pace at which we amuerman.

Hi, for some time that I it was not anodadado to the title of a film. It is this called in English "The prestige", whose translation may be "The prestige". Okay, so it is already is to say what is already sold pescao. Because they have had to change the name to fuck us the surprise ending. It reminds me the movie the fear that "The son of the Rosamary" should have called and it was called "The seed of the devil", when it could well have been "the Mary Rose is the has the devil follao". Seeing is believing.The film's two apprentices of Mage which are separated by things that happen. Well, for things that happen and that one makes something that other sit as a kick in the testicles themselves. Total, they are mounted on their own, but as they are the best two of London (and in Europe and in the whole world) devoted part of its efforts to bitching to another. Indeed, nothing more to start it seems that one kills the other drowning him, that I had forgotten. Heh, heh.I have to admit that, for a change, not I learned too well. The use of the flashback kills me completely, and spends half movie changing its aspect to bitching to another, because I do not hear. But as my medium Zucchini if he finds me guide with wisdom. The first thing is to comment that the movie is long, and is long. Also as you know that at the end there is a tremendous Fireworks (which does not lock) because you you spend the time thinking about what it will be. The atmosphere is more than correct, and the plot is very successful. I was pleasantly surprised by the inclusion of Nikola Tesla, and know that the magicians of the time were engineers who rode them all the sheds.In short, long film about the goings of wizards, it would be surprising if simply incredibly had translated the original title. Even so, the final product is of very high quality, despite the slippages in the pace at which we amuerman.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2015

Tyler

Pequeña miss sunshine

muchocine

This script is internal action, but physical movement. You should learn from it Spaniards and Argentines, and stop doing so extremely boring movies.

"Little Miss Sunshine" has possibly one of the best scripts for the last year. And I don't mean in terms of content, that also, but in terms of his technique.The movies of internal action such as this, are much more difficult to write. In addition to much more boring to do so. A good few times script is entertaining to read it, because it is not made for that, is made to be read. "Little Miss Sunshine" has much work of script, dialogues and characters triangulation, about it works this movie. Use a lot of sub-plots to move a main plot "must lead to this girl in the competition".The screenwriter Michael Arndt, knows this very well. And mounts its structure on these relationships, doing something quite frantic trip. These characters live on the verge of their own lives. The script is to study it, its structure and frames, regardless of the moral content or not having. It is a rounded script, as the of "the Fisher King". Work a script so frantic about family relationships is very difficult, you have to have very good characters to make it work. I imagine that Mr Ardnt had to spend hours writing the lives of each one of them, trying to it were interesting and consistent, and thinking that it was going to put everyone in a van to make a long trip. I had to have much material so that it does not aburriese. And it gets more than. It gives a lesson in how to write.The movie is fun but sometimes something ñoña, which you forget and forgive as the rest.Greg Kinnear is one of his best roles, and Steve Carrell this huge in her role as suicidal mad homosexual.Alan Arkin is another issue. It is a lesson of what it is to act.Abigail Breslin, the girl, makes it great in a role that, contrary to what it seems, is quite difficult. Playing a thousand million times better than the backward mental of Jennifer Hudson in "Dreamgirls".Everything is going to hell, he is very pessimistic, but unlike many movies, it gives a positive vision of pessimism.The directors are two, a couple from the videoclip, which here forget paraphernalia to give us a good story.Then say that here the people will not see Spanish film by the budget of our movies. I don't think that "Little Miss Sunshine" was very expensive. Only esque tien a great script, unlike the vast majority of our movies that are antifísicas.This script is internal action, but physical movement. You should learn from it Spaniards and Argentines, and stop doing so extremely boring movies.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1848

Cp

Shooter: El Tirador

muchocine

What serious critics call a fascistoid movie, quite rightly, that advocates the eye for an eye, carry weapons such as right to defend themselves and go to the mountains and distrust of the federal Government.

Expected before going to the movies, because basically what found me, a movie-style action tapes and shots of the 80's, where the protagonist, disillusioned veteran of war is called out on a mission for his country, betrayed, and decides to take revenge for that have killed his dog (literal!, joke, but literally) fighting against a corrupt and full of incompetent system. Up there, perfect. A hard, very hard, protagonist is injected artisan serum alone, than loose very funny lapidary phrases, that falls in love with the girl, with his eyes (do not gave time more, so it would be by looking? well, or by the abdominal muscles, so deny it) that is finding characters that's so exaggerated, are very fun, and especially kill their enemies easily. And that is the greatest failure of the film. In the 80 see as Governor Arnorld eliminated bad twenty per minute was good, but in this era post-bourne, the truth is that I'd rather see something more realistic, and already posts with a good script, clear.In the end, what serious critics call a fascistoid movie, quite rightly, that advocates the eye for an eye, carry weapons such as right to defend themselves and go to the mountains and distrust of the federal Government. But that's not all. If you've been at it, boy, I am afraid that you are an izquierdosillo lounge, you think not much. By that? Because that to find a film that criticizes so clearly the Bush Government, large corporations of the oil, the international hypocrisy, to as treat Africa and poor countries, and as the army and American intelligence services are at the service of large corporations and their interests must be traced back to Syriana. Intermingled with the first speech, constantly find pearls of wisdom, especially at the mouth of the bad (which are very, very bad) making it clear that we live in a world where globalization unbridled capitalism allows Rumsfeld say in public that not Iraq they invaded by oil and not be lynched. Anyway, after this, should be a partnership between United Left and the anti-federales mountain in Montana, but already.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/697

Radon

El corral

muchocine

It is worth going to see it with them if only to see the faces of surprise, laughter and his gestures when appears the evil coyote.

This same have later been in the cinema watching this film. Once again turn tales of animation for all ages to cargrse to the paternal or maternal figure, which does not seem too correct being viewing by young children, but in the end we're going to do, all blame Bambi.Partiendo that history tries to transmit the values given by others and thinking on others rather than oneselfthe idea that animals take human skills when humans don't realize it is original. What it is not entirely clear is the cisco form with the cattle. On the one hand we have a handful of cows that have lost the horns, so either terneritos or cow adult. For more auction is that cows can be males (as the protagonist of the story, Otis, a very male cow that is walking around on two legs with their udders hanging and if horns) or females that is normal.On the basis of which we can make a mess to the more small to close to cows, Bulls, the horns and the animals can walk on two legs, I think it is worth going to see it with them if only to see the faces of surprise, laughter and his gestures when appears the evil coyote.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1263

Tito Chinchan

Atrapa el fuego

muchocine

Drama on apartheid based on the life of a real person. It is not mourn or severely hurt the soul, if not a biography that shows us how human beings can transform.

That bad I have in view, that thought was Will Smith of the poster, and is a type that no know. Well, at least this error led me to meet my quota of monthly dramas without much tear and nasal moqueo.The film is about Patrick Chamusso, a black man living in South Africa during apartheid. He works at a refinery and has managed to become foreman, as well as having a wife that she wants to and two precious daughters. Even dedicated his free time to train some kids to soccer. This hobby, together with another that is not the case, led him to be suspected of terrorism by which it is treated as such. So great was that rolled it became an icon of the liberation of South Africa, I say no more.Good, good, a dramita to start the week. I have to say that, despite being a drama, I liked the movie. It has excessively harsh scenes and does not leave a feeling too bad. Isn't that the thing is loose if that isn't treated with less harshness than it could be. To highlight the work of Tim Robins, which comes the role of bad things like ring to the finger. And, as always, I love that this is a real case and that at the end leave the Lord (you know that does not die) real alongside actor. We could say that it is a hymn to freedom.In short, drama on apartheid based on the life of a real person. It is not mourn or severely hurt the soul, if not a biography that shows us how human beings can transform.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/753

Albert Puyuelo

The Queen

muchocine

Drama on the situation of decadence through which pass all the monarchs today. Frears plays with delicate issues that tend to be abused by the yellow press.

Get to our screens The Queen, a production of United Kingdom with a very British flavour. So much so that it focuses on a small stage which passed their monarchs. Specifically, this film tells us what happened after the death of Lady Di, when the pedia English population to his Queen to make a public display of pain. One of the key characters in this short historical period was the newly elected Tony Blair, who here plays magnificently Michael Sheen. Its role is compelling from start to finish, something which is absolutely essential, because he is the connection of all the characters. Although it is only really a puppet and it seems babear kiss the hand of the Queen, his figure lets air where there. For this reason, with another actor who had not been able to reach the level of Sheen, it is possible that the fabulous interpretation of the Queen of England does Helen Mirren, had not served anything.What tells us here Stephen Frears hardly will be of interest to the general public. The relationship between the Queen and members of their families, or with his chamberlán and other lackeys, becomes a bit repetitive. Of agreement that the life of a monarch outsole to be very monotonous, but it did not lack that laid out in the film. If the history of Lady Di and his relationship with the Royal family does not interest us, or we know it very well, might not hook us the plot of The Queen. But there are enough elements added for taste. The monarchy is represented intelligently, with very subtle ironies, but without never falling into the realm of comedy. It is a drama about the situation of decadence through which pass all the monarchs today and that, in this respect, it will please any Democrat. Stephen Frears touches gently topics that tend to be abused by the yellow press, and even sandwiched images of actual recordings with fictitious videos to explain the key moments.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/983

Silvia

La noche de los girasoles

muchocine

A story that makes us reflect on the coincidences, bad luck, how you can change lives in a single night and how many people's lives can change following a single circumstance or as a result of the actions of a single person.

The night of the sunflowers is an original rural suspense story, set in a quiet village in which seems that it nothing ever happens. It is the story of a night in which the lives of some characters changed completely after living an extreme situation that marks all in one way or another. A film of intrigue, of police suspense in the wake of a murder in which a series of coincidences are involved a group of people unknown among them.Pedro (Mariano Alameda) and Stephen (Carmelo Gómez) are two cavers arriving in a village in a mountain area to explore a cave. The bride of Stephen, Gabi, accompanies them up there but does not come with them and decides to wait in a nearby spot, at the foot of the mountain. But when the espeolólogos return, they find Gabi dam of an anxiety attack. As soon as they have the opportunity, the boys decide to take revenge on the person who has frightened to Gabi but mistakenly kill another individual that has the misfortune of appearing at the wrong time.The story is structured in a puzzle in which parts are slowly fitting throughout history. Each chapter of the story leads for a label that can give us clues about its protagonists (the man in the motel, the cavers, the man of the way) and does not follow a linear order but that the director plays to explain the story by leaps in time or flashbacks so that the story is told from all points of view of the different characters. However, despite knowing the end of some sequences, the interest of the Viewer to know how the story remains intact. The plot is fully explained but left some loose. The director knows dosed tension throughout history even though it is from the turning point involving the murder when the viewer never ceases to surprise and not left to guess about what is happening. The shortage of light helps foster that intriguing atmosphere, in a manner achieved an environment where everything seems possible.Apart from a suspense film, it's a drama of development of characters and even a costumbrista history reflects the concern peoples by its almost inevitable abandonment. The directorial debut of Jorge Sánchez-Cabezudo Spanish has as protagonists with Carmelo Gómez, Judith Diakhate, Celso Bugallo, Manuel Morón, Mariano Alameda and Vicente Romero. Interpretations are notable as a whole, but perhaps the most disturbing role it embodies the Chief of police (Celso Bugallo). The character of the Chief of police is located in the dilemma of choosing between acting according to dictates his professional ethics or according to their own interests.The filmmaker explained in an interview that interested him much further in the psychological development of the characters: "they are ordinary characters faced with extreme situations, and perhaps one of the major objectives of the film is precisely the consider how that ordinary people can result in a situation so complicated and dramatic;" What are the circumstances, and the psychological, personal and emotional mechanisms that lead to do what they do and above all justified in their actions to continue living. "It is not a film of good and bad, it is a very human characters.A story that makes us reflect on the coincidences, bad luck, how you can change lives in a single night and how many people's lives can change following a single circumstance or as a result of the actions of a single person. A drama that leaves an aura of sadness, fatalism, because what is narrated from the fiction can bring much to our reality.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2207

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Pasión de los fuertes

muchocine

The film is a perfect example to explain that does not know what is the western. One of the best western in the history of cinema.

The strong passion is anti-western: Ford dismisses set his talent in the pure action, although this comes at the time and set the epic and tragic tone of the genus. Nor is it a western Baroque: the economy of means and the absence of artifice gives an unusual poetic splendor, subordinate to the conquest of ideals and the romanticism of the birth of a nation. Because Ford has that: the founding of a country, the progressive laws seat that they will govern and living conditions for settlers believe a folklore, enabling the cult a religion and, above all, susbscriban the stereotype of a nation, because the United States of America are born with Wyatt Earp and these characters on the back of the fatalityherding animals by dusty landscapes and forging legends where the heroes obey strict codes of honor. The film is a perfect example to explain that it does not know what is the western: appearing in nothing and peoples who live around the tavern where the bar bars are endless and the whisky is the entertainment of the dispossessed and those who lampan for a better future; Sheriffs with a strict severe of duty and a well established moral integrity; pianists who come to be juke-box of the time. Passion of the strong (My darling Clementine) is, on the other hand, duel of the Titans, the time of handguns, Tombstone, duel at OK Corral or Wyatt Earp: are all the same movie. John Ford is the freest of the primordial argument version, which departs from the script and staged the socio-political vision of a man who invented, in their own way, a genre, the western. Tombstone, the anthological people, to whom Bob Dylan dedicated an accelerated immortal blues, is this Ford Tombstone. Henry Fonda is Wyatt Earp, the farmer that random and revenge become sheriff. Doc Holliday, the surgeon tormented, conflictive and continuous process of personal redemption is Victor Mature. And John Ford, of course, has the wit and sensitivity of violence become poetry, subvert an argument necessarily agile and prone to action in an intimate table of customs, in a beautiful portrait of a nascent society, where men killed and died by trivial matters and where the law was a conversation between Knights acodados in the bar of a bar.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/516

Dragon negro

Shinobi

muchocine

The film entertains and appeal to lovers of gender feudal loving of the manga, and Japanese although the film, as we have said, is half in all its goals.

In 1614, the Shinobi are ninjas with special magical abilities that make them superior to the common man. The Shinobi are trained from small in two small villages, Kouga clan and the Iga clan and are staunch enemies from long ago. The two villages live in peace because the Emperor banned the war between them, but decide now facing two villages in order to choose a successor to the throne the outcome of the match. Each village will elect five of his best warriors who will face on a whim of the emperor. Gennosuke of the Kouga and Oboro, the Iga, are two young men who fell in love in the time of peace and now capitanearan two teams that face, the destination takes them to the fight between them and they must choose between love or death. Shinobi, based on the popular manga, continues to be another of those movies of the feudal Japan dressed with fantastic dyes, because their Samurai possess different powers that make them special. The film part of a quite simple argument and despite the complicated names and initial history credits one quickly enters the plot and understands it, and also the film is aimed more towards action than to large filosofadas to which we are accustomed the Japanese, which are two points in its favour. But the film is missing something that just does not work and is its inability to move and that we identify with the characters. Already alone the love story to the Romeo and Juliet is lack of spark and naturalness everywhere, battles are well but without being all spectacular could be wait and one is left with wanting more, it shows a limited budget, of course. The lack of good and bad, none of the two clan can be defined as such, the Viewer does not end of siding with either of the two sides, with which the battles he fail to involve him and left quite indifferent. Villages resemble Naruto, with children train Ninjas, warriors remember superheroes, X-Men with some of their powers and even Spider-man when they nodding hanging by a thread. The film entertains and like the Japanese feudal genre lovers and lovers of manga, although the film, as we have said, is half in all its goals, the fight scenes are unable to move, the love story just does not work and the film itself fails, except counted as the final moments, get you in the history.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3281

Francisco Bellón

El sueño de Cassandra

muchocine

Cassandra´s Dream is one of the more loose of all films of Woody Allen, who uses themes already exploited in Match Point, Scoop, or offences and misdemeanours.

True to its autumnal appointment, comes the new Woody Allen film in a year in which precisely the figure of New York filmmaker has been one of the most giving that talk. And it is that without doubt the filming of the project Spanish of Allen (who will take title Vicky Cristina Barcelona) has created a great expectation, that will significantly benefit the commercial Cassandra´s Dream.En race this new work, Allen returns to play some of the themes already played in his previous works, Match Point and Scoop (although this was a comedy)(it still very much in mind the murder and its consequences). On this occasion, two brothers who for various reasons urgently needed a large amount of money, are facing the decision to achieve their dreams if they accept to kill a person. Woody Allen remains Woody Allen, i.e. Cassandra´s Dream is a film that possesses an excellent Bill, but however it is not at the height of the filmography from the New York filmmaker. The script uses the recurring questions (murder, ethical and moral issues, the fault, repentance) in the recent film of Allen, becoming the development of history and their own it plot something tired and repetitive. Even calls attention to one of the female characters is an actress with a desire to succeed, as Scarlett Johansson in Match Point. The interpretive level of the tape is one of their greatest virtues, with Ewan McGregor and Colin Farrell simply extraordinary, that accompanies a no less brilliant Tom Wilkinson, and Hayley Atwell, genuine revelation of the film.Cassandra´s Dream is one of the more loose of all films of Woody Allen, who uses themes already exploited in Match Point, Scoop, or offences and misdemeanours. In the film only we can recognize the usual ingenuity of Allen, lost among so much philosophical digression.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1225

Yojimbo

Glengarry Glenn Ross

muchocine

A Bible of interpretation and a remarkable film that sometimes leaves us with an open mouth.

Recently, in the already closed Daily Prices of La Coruña, I had the opportunity to acquire this film in its only Edition on dvd. Her he had been hired at the time and it had proved to be one of the worst editions on dvd that he had seen. It would be unfair if not say that it looks to be one of the first films in this format. Why has no subtitles in Castilian (although the audio in English) or not (amazing) extras the role of skip chapters during the film. Still, for the price that I purchased her worth.James Foley had hand in a surprising and very young cast. Does are obviously talking about a film of 1992: Jack Lemmon was still a second maturity, Ed Harris had hair, Al Pacino seemed a newly licensed dandy, a teenage "climbs" Kevin Spacey, Alec Baldwin had received the first fascicles of "how to do cabronazo in the film"?But we should not forget the guru that you probably gathered all: David Mamet.El great playwright and author of emblematic plays and admirable cinematographic works (many based on those scripts) is the main protagonist. Both the construction and the dialogues are a masterfully structured vehicle to give us insight into nothing dogmatic but if cruel and oppressive of absorbent and ruthless can be live to work. The great works are distinguished by simplicity, see how something humble can be great and apparently hasn't cost work carried out. This is Mamet. In this film all the characters, even glib statements, are nothing more than a metaphor. There is a great salesman that seems that doesn't sell, others instead of selling to customers sold big tradeoffs between them in order to achieve what you should do based on "suckers" and some damn chips with data from potential buyers who put in check the values of a few "greyhounds" that must be the goal rather than his third post will make them lose the job.A great movie and a great original work that lays bare all gotten manipulations and having all the dirty tricks that we can use in times of despair.With Foley collaborated Juan Ruiz Anchia, that great patriotic director of photography fully settled in USA that brings the lights and shadows of this work and a discrete James Newton Howard.Una masterpiece for those who want to learn more about how do dialogues, a Bible of interpretation and a remarkable film that sometimes leaves us with an open mouth and a smile of "fuck""go peliculón".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2091

José A. Peig

Piratas del Caribe: En el Fin del Mundo

muchocine

Do not know if future generations will discover any beauty or innovation worthy of worship in this medley of styles Kitsch, immortal classics and typical universes of the pop era, but for now it seems that it is not.

Now it is fashionable do Trilogies, which does not have why be neither good nor bad, but at least we have clear that the third is the key and it will depend on the value to be attributing to this trilogy. Even more so when the episode that remains in the middle (the chest of the dead man) does much more than the being a bridge between the first and third part, depicting the true knot of history and that already showed us that the freshness and simplicity of the first installment could degenerate into a deslavazado, unbalanced and irregular "show" Baroque. "Pirates of the Caribbean", as a trilogy, is really a trilogy about the pirates, seeing the result?. Do not we think also a strange mix between the romantic figure of the pirate and the buffoonish cartoon of the pirate? Exaltation or ridicule on the archetype of the pirate? And care when it is said that Verbinski trilogy "has revived the genre of pirates" (to begin with, the "gender of pirates" don't exist as such), as shantytowns, the phantasmagoria, quirky humor and not always lucky, epic drama and other dyes, are taken to such extremes in his third installment to be to start thinking in different and varied approaches. Calls powerfully the attention the neglect and the ease with which many critics and commentators are eligible to the franchise as "palomitero film", or "film for all audiences". Entertaining film?. That was worth for "The curse of the Black Pearl". From "Dead man's chest" this has become another thing. And now, at the end of the world, attending the "movements" of the plot - which is twisted to the mind of the Viewer by the abuse of "movements" in the history of the characters, not because the plot is complex-. really someone could believe that 168 minutes you can be "entertained" the Viewer, especially teenagers who are supposed is directed the product?. Lol At first glance, the pirates trilogy becomes an unclassifiable expression of the more gross masses film industry operation, a desperate attempt to find the genuine and original in a time where it seems that everything is already invented, especially in the area of family movies, entertainment, adventures. But the result is unclassifiable does not mean that it is original, can mask a product deeply failed in its latest claims. Most importantly, the problem is the mixture of textures, blend does not respond to the needs and attributes of the adventure film. Also responds to the needs and attributes of the public. Or is that we are satisfied with four antics of the jester Sparrow and the visual in the battles delight with the suggestive power of some passages thanks to the successes in the artistic design?. Mixture that lacks a reason beyond a claim to be very specific. Along the 168 minutes we encounter frames that almost referred to the minimalist art, gestures and Dreamscapes, Daliniano surrealism at times seems an experimental film. The schizophrenia which looks doomed Sparrow in the hell of David Jones is puzzling, especially because it is not entirely located in the inherent in the character context. Of course, that a free pirate little or nothing can do with a boat settled in the desert, with horizons and to go to any part. But we all know that Sparrow is a solo adventurer and his schizophrenia cannot be justified by isolation, because that is their natural condition. Every geek can justify the scene to your tastes, but - intuitively - critic detects easily to the scenes of Sparrow in the hell of David Jones (and why is supposed to be the hell of David Jones of that form and not another? does have something to do, in fact, with the character?) are a capricious "hard" with the pretension of originality in flag. In addition, Jack Sparrow has always been a jester, what we have been saying since the first installment, but in these scenes derides the character maybe already excessive degree. The Phantasmagoria is still present in the mythical motives of the world represented, in this case, we see some suggestive pictures of the dead souls wandering under the surface of the sea or visit on the boats, towards a hell of Dante who here has the name of David Jones. The father of Elizabeth is one of the pilgrims to the death, and his farewell - the way in which disappears from the story - may be shocking. The world of the Pirates of the Caribbean is dark and sinister, is no longer a fantasy film, but a sequence of oneiric passages in which, at times, reappears the disneyano spirit. True the dreamlike texture was already in its predecessor, but it accumulates here almost scene after scene, including that battle final in a sea that is no longer the sea, is a nightmare in the form of aquatic spiral that makes shooting ships supporting the feuding sea adventurers, and the issue is not trivial as the strange feeling spread by the circle movement breaks with the conventional schemes at the time of film epic battles. Not lacking imagination nor in the scene in which the Black Pearl and its crew go of the world of the dead to the "real" world. When the Sun falls on the world of the dead, the boat is placed upside down, beneath the surface, to put right on the surface of the real world, when leaving the Sun this (is a scene so original that it can not be defined in writing, we must see it.) Point. ). As simple and evocative as suggestive and striking in the visual embodiment of Verbinski. Never be could benefit both film of a Disneyland attraction. Then appears such goddess Calypso, caught in a mortal body because of a pact between the members of the pirate Guild, which turns out to be the lost love of David Jones. Baroque, accompanied mythologies, circus humor, poetry, surrealism, tales from the underworld, oniric dreams. Movie Pirates in classic plan?. If Michael Curtiz lift head. The plot of "In the end of the world" is that already intuíamos: the final battle in which the pirates play the survival against the new order of Lord Beckett. But it is not so simple; on several occasions the characters go from one side to another, and not attentive spectator can lose with much movement. And what is worse, it is a movement not sustained on plot bases (or, if there are, are poorly developed and therefore the Viewer cannot understand why Will Turner done now and then the other and then about more than. film of entertainment?, bah) but on the need to stretch the product to achieve the 168 minutes. Fashion are the blockbusters of long duration (the fault is Peter Jackson and New Line) and we must put it in the drawer in the size appropriate based on the predominant industrial model. The third had to be the expired and should be given three hours of show. In the end. It was also predictable, we encounter the narrative saturation: too many characters, too many variables, too many themes introduced. There are so many situations and characters to develop not delves into none of them (to be more precise, not end to define its role in the scheme), just an outline fast to go fast and running towards the final half-hour, single space footage endowed with meaning and narrative meaning. The rest are mostly poorly explained vicissitudes that only make the role, as we have already mentioned, of go stretching product. Fortunately, several of these incidents not are exempt of inventiveness and imagination, from time to time we run into powerful images fruit of a splendid scene, and the presence of Jack Sparrow, although perhaps in this third installment since start to be too repetitive in his gestures and its forms, always saves time and recover part of the original freshness. These same defects already existed in "Dead man's chest", and we discussed at the time, but there were a pass due to his condition of episodio-puente. Here the harmful effect of saturation and the hasty narrative ends up stifling much of the content, and the consequences are more serious. However, in his favour, there is to say that successive "betrayals", "movements", "changes of side" of the characters, respond to its nature, or the very nature of the pirate world: the pirate is selfish and seeks to own profit. No one here has scruples if what is to achieve the goal, despite who is. Hence the constant flow of decisions and changes of direction. The idea itself is consistent and fits well with this pirate universe, but the exhibition of motives and emotional tone of the characters is so disjointed that ends by saturate the information that can reach the Viewer. This produces an effect; comes a time in which nothing matters now and can only surrender to the visual spectacle to see how everything ends, but lacks it the dramatic force and a properly exposed human deployment. David Jones was a character that they could have gotten much party, but your profile is blurred between the whirlwind of structural and narrative disruption. Orlando Bloom, which is presumed Resolutive hero, shows that it has no charisma to embody this hero. However, ultimately, the trilogy closes in a correct and logical manner, too much logic perhaps, therefore doesn't glimmer for the surprise (funny is that this product is meant to be so original in its blend of textures and instead is so little innovative in the conclusion of the story). David Jones always represent the eternal alma en pena of melancholy, the hell of the tormented love: in his last moments of life, pronounced the name of his beloved let his body drop and is integrated with the sea, which previously had also integrated the goddess of the sea, Calypso, and so, symbolically, the two lovers meet in the ocean of eternity. Will Turner redeems the crew of the Flying Dutchman and offers his love heart to be the new captain and King of the seas. Elizabeth, solitary heroin next to the seashore, where the heart of Turner and reminded her lover while he otea horizons and dreams of pirate adventures. Jack Sparrow is heading. The flat end where we see him get away in pursuit of the Sun, solo between the immensity of the sea and traveling on a small sailboat, with a map in hand, thinking about his next adventure (does the eternal youth?), is the exact representation of what always has meant and has become it an icon of the current film, beyond of his jester skills. In fact, closes a cycle and returns to the starting point. There will be a fourth installment, who doubts it. In short, more than an unclassifiable product "at the end of the world" is a reflection of the current time within the film industry trade, which aims to innovate modernising old myths and schemes using new formulas. But if not we take care of the structure, the structuring and the sense of narrative, by very good are ideas that we have on the table, the final product, with its bombast of media and elements, stagnates in the undefined, without defining its objectives (George Lucas committed the same sin in his new Galactic trilogy, but that we'll talk another day.). Hence the decline of the trilogy Pirates of the Caribbean, which started very well and might be the current equivalent to what at the time were Star Wars and Indiana Jones. Do not know if future generations will discover any beauty or innovation worthy of worship in this medley of styles Kitsch, immortal classics and typical universes of the pop era, but for now it seems that it is not.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3987

José Antonio Bermúdez

XXY

muchocine

The film deals with a subject unknown to most of the public. Therein lies their courage. But it goes no further. Not deepens, it stays on the surface of relations.

The identity has become the main theme of the Argentine cinema. And it is that identity has a very important socio-historical weight. Get in the skin of hundreds, thousands, of children stolen during the dictatorship military adopting them as a prize for his patriotism. These children of the disappeared in recent years, with the essential work of the Grandmothers of Mayo, have been rediscovered with its past, with their identity synonymous with freedom. Quite an achievement for an Argentine society which, in this case, has become model to follow. So films ranging from the later official history the Kamchatka stop there, as well as countless documentaries as representative as the BLONDES.The identity is definitely installed in contemporary Argentine cinema. And it makes covering a wide range of stories. Note: EL ABRAZO PARTIDO (where is my father), born and raised (lost, without identity), LUNA DE AVELLANEDA (I was born in this neighborhood), EL OTRO (the search of identity), the dead (recover my identity) the list is endless. A last case speaks of sexual identity: XXY.The hermaphrodite, which has the two sexes. The first film of the hitherto writer Lucía Puenzo, tells the story of Alex, a teenager of 15 years who was born with what doctors call genital ambiguity. The parents of Alex escape from Buenos Aires, and his daughter becomes a phenomenon in the people. Now, adolescence, Alex must decide which sex to have, who.The film deals with a subject unknown to most of the public. Therein lies their courage. But it goes no further. Not deepens, it stays on the surface of the relationship between Alex and Álvaro, son of a friend of the parents of Alex. The epicentre not power, but blurs the internal conflict of Alex (played by the young Inés Efron), his relationship with his father (played by Ricardo Darín), with the comunidad.todo is small, ridiculous, as if it were a movie. In line with the development of history, the end fades, betting on the interest of the public, with a moralizing tone than attentive to the intelligence of the Viewer.The identity once again in Argentine cinema. The film travels to the Oscars and the Goya. Now question is (it is an open discussion) by the identity of the latest (new) Argentine cinema. XXY responds to the formula of the presentable film to any festival and award. Today that is the sole purpose of the film is done in Argentina. An identity problem.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/256

Robgordon

La casa del lago

muchocine

New snapshot of American romantic drama, governed by the same rules and common topics you

Since their first minutes of footage, this new drama romantic "made in america" reminds us specifically to "City of Angels" and generally that "modus operandi" which has the yankee film to tell us one of romances. "Even the fact of being directed by Argentine Alejandro Agresti, makes"The Lake House"that something, that bit of personality, which he differs from films like for example"message in a bottle"and carer.""The Lake House" is a story of impossible love. But in these times, the impossibility of love on the big screen should have a fantastic touch. Nothing of poems of love with characters that are searched and not found by chance, luck and destinations. "The Lake House", as also was "City of Angels" (with whom he has numerous points in common) are love stories with fantastic pretext, a mixture fuck in clips and usually evident gaps in his scripts little to analyze them. "Far away is not to love for logical reasons and verosimiles seen in"Letter from an unknown woman"(wonder of the seventh art) or without going beyond in" lovers of the polar circle "by Julio Medem, masterpiece of the loving misfortunes.""The Lake House" is the debut Hollywood by Alejandro Agresti, director of "the wind what" or "El sueño de Valentin". He joins Walter Salles or Fernando Meirelles, directors of South America are cared for in the North to make products in its industry. Furthermore, "The Lake House" means the on-screen reunion of (one entered in years and some that another kilo) Sandra Bullock and Keanu Reeves, twelve years after finding a bus without the possibility of brake.The story told in the film tells of two lonely characters (Bullock and Revees) that maintain correspondence between the two through a mailbox located in a House on a Lake, where the two lived. Presumably witty, is that they are written at the same time but live in different years, exactly with two years of distance between them, which means a burden for her, ever increasing love.That plot excuse is the base to show us the love they profess Sandra and Keanu, and the tricky thing will be that can see. A usual manoeuvre of the American romantic drama, seeking rapid effect on the Viewer, of impotence by the amorous encounter. An excuse plot is not, nor much less, original Hollywood, "The Lake House" is another remake, in this case a Korean tape of the year 2000 titled "Siworae" and known throughout the world as "Il Mare".However, "The Lake House" takes place without penalty or glory during his footage, with flat inconsequential lurking songs accompanied by abuse and a constant feeling of tragic victimism in its protagonists (notably Bullock). There are numerous close-ups of Sandra Bullock, which consists a sad character as little expressive. The side are of low status and participation and we found Christopher Plummer to doing the same role that makes four or five times each year, in different films. A film that not clear a pinch of personality. In addition, it is preferable to not enter in the game of spatio-temporal of the film approaches, because you will find so many gaps in script. Do Porque.¿no could be Sandra Bullock known location and the State of Reeves in 2006, only to find his name in the guide of phones or even write it in Google, as this is a well-known architect that easily will appear in the search engine?. Instead Bullock if that it explores on the day on which he died the father of this or any other irrelevant data. That makes the Ribbon can extend at the 1: 40 minutes that lasts. "In other words, in the logical, just it would happen the minute of footage way.""The Lake House" is, therefore, a new sample of making American romantic drama, governed by the same rules and common topics, regardless of whether its director is imported in Africa, Latin America or Europe, denoting that from time to time imposed by the large producers and need of a film as well that offer the Viewer.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/712

Vsancha

Pequeña miss sunshine

muchocine

Film friendly, sincere and fun but at the same time hard, macabre capable of moving from a smile to a laugh easily, a story of a few losers winners.

Its simplicity is its beauty, many will say that it is one film about dysfunctional family seen thousand times, but little Miss Sunshine has something else that makes it special, something difficult to explain, but you catch the end of film. I insist on that little Miss Sunshine after seeing her leave you a certain sense of let-vu and that may it seem to many films we have seen previously, but has something special that makes during the entire duration of the film so you spend really well, a rather nice time that with the passage of the minutes and the end is a feeling which increases and after seeing her I firmly believe that it is due to his peculiar characters that conform the family Hoover, a mother struggling because everything is perfect within the family nucleus, a father that is dedicated to selling methods of self-help being a total loser, the uncle who tried suicide, teen asqueado by what surrounds it, which has the largest Idol Nietzsche and does not speak to achieve its goal, the grandfather that gives you heroin and maintains a peculiar and enchanting relationship with his granddaughterwhich is the to be presented to the beauty contest on a crazy journey will be involved all members of the family. The film is very appealing aesthetically, with a very colorful picture and an elegant address in the debut of the couple of novice directors Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris. The actors that give life to all and each of the members of the family are great, stressing over the role of the small Abigail Breslin and a brilliant Steve Carrell. It's a film friendly, sincere and fun but at the same time hard, macabre capable of moving from a smile to a laugh easily, a story of a few losers winners. A kick in the mouth to the American dream, to the desire for victory and the cult of beauty, an ode to normalcy and a film that reminds us what subjective is something like the success or triumph.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1231

Yojimbo

The woodsman

muchocine

Surprising debut and a great occasion to reward Bacon with the Oscar, but if already not honored a transsexual, imagine you nominate a pederast.

Some actors have a healthy habit of investing their megasueldos in miniproducciones as stars (beyond, of course) in films who believe more interesting and will bring them more professional satisfaction.An example is Kevin Bacon, executive producer of The Woodsman (here the lumberjack: P), directed by another Director, in this case debutante, with great tact and sensitivity, Nicole Kasell.El argument, more thorny: a pederast is reintegrated into society.Since then Bacon could have been chosen a role and a less controversial topic, but that adds a point of interest and a lot of discomfort for what the film may contain. However good feel of the Director, as Niki Karo in the land of men, in this case fails to load the inks but neither redeems the character. That if you know create a tension without an explicit description that will make the Viewer is feared the worst. Or what about Bacon, accompanied by his wife in real life, Kyra Sedgwick, is the best of the film. All his work is the epicenter of a well conducted history and some times very uncomfortable, emotional and even full of rage and anger. They also have weird appearances Mos Def (of 16 streets) and Benjamin Bratt as a close relative.The film also portrays how can be the "reintegration" of a subject as this film, which not only already tries to be invisible to the rest of the world by his own guilt and remorse, but that some people leave you in peace and not make more difficult their existence with continuous rumors and gossip. Separate point is to rebuild a life, especially if you have had family. And, perhaps worst of all, check if it is able to again do something terrible to a boy or a girl. None of these elements is ignored in the film, which can be described as courageous.Surprising debut and a great occasion to reward Bacon with the Oscar, but if already not honored a transsexual, imagine you nominate a pederast.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/84

Caro

Transamerica

muchocine

Great performance by Felicity Huffman

I have no words to describe this film is simply great. Felicity does a great job and shows the great actress that is and why has taken all these awards (the Oscar it has to win), I had only seen in desperate housewives and the change of registration I loved and if you see the film in VO can be seen much more. Plus: the same as the bends in the series has been commissioned to put the voice in the film, not puts serious enough, at first a little bit her, but then you forget. The first half hour is a bit slow, but once they gradually develop the stories of the characters stay hooked in this world. Say also that I like more the American tagline that have been Spain; Life is more than the sum of its parts.Bree, before Stan, is about to get the authorization to undergo sex change operation, but receives the call from a guy who claims to be his son. Her psychiatrist tells him that he must know the boy before signing the authorization. Bree reluctantly agrees to go to New York to get the kid in jail, although bail is $ 1, Toby is not No Angel, with 17 years trapichea with drugs and he has been arrested for prostitution. The kid convinces him to take him to Los Angeles, where will be porn actor, and buy a car. The journey is full of incidents and lies. Bree has not told that it is his true father and less is actually a man (he said that it is the Church of the potential father) and Toby just discovering his secret. Although initially he reacts badly, ends by accepting to Bree. A hippie steals the car and leaves them stranded on the road without more clothes than carrying it implementation. In a bar, Bree League with a man that leaves them in Phoenix, in Bree.La parents house mother fatal reacts to see her daughter, but the rest of the family does not seem to have any problem (especially the sister). When he confesses to them that Toby is her son, the mother begins to treat him superbly, and even wants to stay to live with them as a condition to pay the airfare to Bree that he arrives late for his operation. Bree finally tells it to Toby who is actually and fatal, reacts to give him a punch in the eye. Already in Los Angeles, Bree is operated, but that day is not the happiest of his life, Miss less Toby.Lo better without a doubt is the great performance by Felicity Huffman. Many of the phrases "my body may be still in process, but there is nothing wrong with my soul". The transsexual blonde and friends. The mother of Bree

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1968

Taliesin

Spiderman 3

muchocine

Respect that Sam Raimi was approached by Spider-man in the first delivery has been diluted in the ego of a director become accustomed to doing things in their own way. The result is an excessive film in many respects, that entertains in the boot and makes you ask the hour at the end.

I'm not a connoisseur to bottom of Spider-man, but enough as to knowing that a character with 45 years of history has passed through many hands and that each one of them has shaped to suit. This means that a Spider-man, there is but many and very different, but all share a profile that Yes belongs to the character and not for the writer or artist turn. And I say this because Sam Raimi has led to film his vision of Spider-man and, like it or not its adaptation, fidelity to the comic is not what most despite the hour to talk about Spider-Man 3. What happens is that if Spider-man fans were quite satisfied with the first installment, I fear that many will be they trinan with the third.The main problem of Spiderman 3 is the respect with which Raimi approached the character has faded after three films in the ego of a director become accustomed to doing things in their own way. The result is an excessive film in almost every aspect: the footage (140 minutes), the amount of enemies, the maniqueismo of the very eighties superheroes, fighting impossible and Tobey Maguire making the clown for longer than necessary. All of this confirms that Raimi has opted for a movie with lots of action and a simple one plot, rather than by an approach to more adult themes, to which a character like Spider-man is very used. It gives the impression that the director has already tired of the spider and says goodbye with a final Fireworks that hides a big empty plot.Presented in this film venom and the Sandman, this character to be the most interesting difference. It is left wanting the lizard, sure we'll see in Spider-man 4, and Gwen Stacy begins to flirt with Parker. But the worst is the change that suffers from Peter Parker when he wears the symbiote. Usually alelado reporter turns an as Nicks Rivers of Val Kilmer in Top Secret. Grace would have been nice if it had lasted five minutes and so we would leave in acceptable if the thing had reached ten. The problem is that if the thing reaches the quarter of an hour, including a number of dance of our friend and neighbor, we have already arrived at the ridiculous more absolute. Yes, we learned that the black suit makes a redomado bastard, do not need to insist.In short, Spiderman 3 is a film starts being entertaining and at the end the hour just asking. Like the South Park movie, is larger, longer and, unfortunately, uncut. Sam Raimi gives us everything and in large quantities, except moderation and a really interesting script. In the end, everything is a succession of scenes without a glue clear between them, it does not mean him missing footage, but quite the opposite. It is true that there are flashes of what could have been an interesting film, but tried to please all audiences, I am afraid that he has angered some and left cold to others. In short, to see and forget.