question
string | answer
string | snippet
string | answerGenerated
string | temperature
float64 | model
string | question_answerGenerated_llama
string | reverse_answer_answerGenerated_llama
string | question_answerGenerated_falcon
string | reverse_answer_answerGenerated_falcon
string | question_answerGenerated_mistral
string | reverse_answer_answerGenerated_mistral
string | judge_answer_answerGenerated_llama
string | judge_answer_answerGenerated_falcon
string | judge_answer_answerGenerated_mistral
string | question_emb
string | snippet_emb
string | answer_emb
string | answerGenerated_emb
string | question_answerGenerated_falcon_emb
string | question_answerGenerated_llama_emb
string | question_answerGenerated_mistral_emb
string | reverse_answer_answerGenerated_llama_emb
string | reverse_answer_answerGenerated_falcon_emb
string | reverse_answer_answerGenerated_mistral_emb
string | judge_answer_answerGenerated_llama_emb
string | judge_answer_answerGenerated_falcon_emb
string | judge_answer_answerGenerated_mistral_emb
string | gold_standard_cos
float64 | question_answerGenerated_falcon_cos
float64 | question_answerGenerated_llama_cos
float64 | question_answerGenerated_mistral_cos
float64 | judge_answer_answerGenerated_falcon_cos
float64 | judge_answer_answerGenerated_llama_cos
float64 | judge_answer_answerGenerated_mistral_cos
float64 | ILRSim
float64 | answer_judge_cos_mean
float64 | question_snippet_similarity
float64 | question_reconstruction_falcon_error
float64 | question_reconstruction_llama_error
float64 | question_reconstruction_mistral_error
float64 | ILRError
float64 | question_bm25_score_mean
float64 | question_rouge_score_mean
float64 | question_bleu_score_mean
float64 | question_alignment
float64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
"What was the Petitioner's claim regarding his suspension and subsequent demobilization in the Supre(...TRUNCATED) | "In the Supreme Court case SC/FR/Application No 556/2010, the Petitioner, Ekanayake Udaya Kumara Eka(...TRUNCATED) | "services were suspended on 06.03.1999 on an incident of shooting, where the Petitioner alleged, tha(...TRUNCATED) | "answer:\n\nThe Petitioner alleged that he was falsely implicated in an incident of shooting and was(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | gemma | What was the reason for the Petitioner's demobilization as stated in the answer? | "answer: The reason for the Petitioner's demobilization as stated in the answer is that he was false(...TRUNCATED) | What were the grounds for the Petitioner's suspension and demobilization? | "The grounds for the Petitioner's suspension and demobilization were the alleged shooting incident a(...TRUNCATED) | "What actions did the Petitioner take after being acquitted of attempted murder charges and being su(...TRUNCATED) | "After being acquitted of attempted murder charges in 2008, the Petitioner appealed to the National (...TRUNCATED) | "answer: According to the Petitioner, his suspension and subsequent demobilization were in violation(...TRUNCATED) | "The petitioner claimed that he was falsely implicated in a shooting incident and was suspended. Aft(...TRUNCATED) | "The Petitioner in the Supreme Court case SC/FR/Application No 556/2010 claimed that his services we(...TRUNCATED) | "[-6.571317195892334, 0.39870285987854004, -1.90718412399292, -0.5415419340133667, 1.229317903518676(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.574007987976074, -0.04678218439221382, -0.25955966114997864, -0.30942171812057495, 1.1342109441(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.7558934688568115, 0.3601875603199005, -0.5701442956924438, -0.9291650056838989, 1.2229053974151(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.9255571365356445, -0.08086246252059937, -0.4684944748878479, -0.8922548294067383, 0.78345471620(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.106407165527344, 2.0979132652282715, -1.2964725494384766, -1.7233177423477173, -0.2077039778232(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.717922687530518, 1.7909492254257202, -1.7532427310943604, -1.1596627235412598, 0.10420492291450(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.4951090812683105, 1.729684591293335, -0.9695169925689697, -1.360302209854126, 0.518360912799835(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.551676273345947, 0.31192857027053833, -0.3317365348339081, -0.5933700799942017, 1.2100852727890(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.368740081787109, 0.6360921859741211, -0.09366334229707718, -0.9101722836494446, 1.6460812091827(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.305347919464111, 0.39465540647506714, -0.3206123113632202, -0.687759280204773, 0.93660593032836(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.560011386871338, 0.47340717911720276, -0.22698882222175598, -0.3577481508255005, 1.027952790260(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.331733703613281, 0.08240574598312378, -0.41056889295578003, -0.4211800992488861, 0.334666341543(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.756859302520752, -0.0946953222155571, -0.5188606977462769, -0.6070696711540222, 1.3861874341964(...TRUNCATED) | 0.988026 | 0.949537 | 0.943686 | 0.976208 | 0.979772 | 0.977847 | 0.994622 | 0.956477 | 0.98408 | 0.979679 | 3.907962 | 4.156322 | 1.801781 | 3.288688 | 2.840327 | 0.924197 | 0.152199 | 0.956477 |
"What were the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in the case SC Appeal No. 44/2(...TRUNCATED) | "The questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in the case SC Appeal No. 44/2011 were: (...TRUNCATED) | "IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA SC Appeal No. 44/2011 E.P.A.(...TRUNCATED) | "The provided text does not specify the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in th(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | gemma | What was the judgment of the High Court of Ampara in the case SC Appeal No. 44/2011? | "Answer: The judgment of the High Court of Ampara in the case SC Appeal No. 44/2011 was decided in f(...TRUNCATED) | What is the issue with the judgment of the High Court of Ampara in the case SC Appeal No. 44/2011? | "The issue with the judgment of the High Court of Ampara in the case SC Appeal No. 44/2011 is that i(...TRUNCATED) | "What are the specific legal issues that were granted leave to appeal in the case SC Appeal No. 44/2(...TRUNCATED) | "The specific legal issues that were granted leave to appeal in the case SC Appeal No. 44/2011 are n(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted in SC Appeal No. 44/2011 are:\n\(...TRUNCATED) | "In SC Appeal No. 44/2011, the questions of law for which leave to appeal was granted were whether t(...TRUNCATED) | "Based on the provided snippet, there is no explicit mention of the questions of law for which leave(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.1045098304748535, 1.5813641548156738, -2.440389394760132, -0.25929784774780273, -0.028894837945(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.168522357940674, 0.3823243975639343, -0.015953535214066505, -0.08127425611019135, 2.36300253868(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.729677200317383, 1.2383532524108887, -1.5435361862182617, -0.588904619216919, 1.210461497306823(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.171180248260498, 0.6325909495353699, -2.788182258605957, 0.10817927867174149, -1.25040459632873(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.73927903175354, 0.651790976524353, -2.1911094188690186, -0.14640842378139496, 0.856172144412994(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.9982547760009766, 0.0621810145676136, -3.051539659500122, -0.16225369274616241, 0.6555871367454(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.057984828948975, 1.1071871519088745, -1.9175366163253784, 0.052734460681676865, 0.6421882510185(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.2248096466064453, 0.7149386405944824, -1.774817943572998, -0.3214181661605835, 0.69147431850433(...TRUNCATED) | "[-1.8255316019058228, 0.7350217700004578, -1.9151780605316162, -0.3154316544532776, 0.5367124080657(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.1234631538391113, 1.1060446500778198, -1.615701675415039, -0.533845841884613, 0.209884196519851(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.384599685668945, 1.4680941104888916, -1.0656685829162598, -1.2223174571990967, 0.76407182216644(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.791624546051025, 1.6842654943466187, -1.8324607610702515, -0.9262635707855225, 0.86588603258132(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.133641242980957, 1.1906745433807373, -1.4304687976837158, -0.5804616808891296, -0.2228817790746(...TRUNCATED) | 0.964528 | 0.954551 | 0.962458 | 0.99095 | 0.980108 | 0.975466 | 0.962185 | 0.96932 | 0.972586 | 0.93867 | 3.398747 | 2.474638 | 0.71976 | 2.197715 | 2.600543 | 1.299294 | 0.939635 | 0.96932 |
"What were the key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016(...TRUNCATED) | "In Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016, the Supreme Court addressed the following key legal issues: (...TRUNCATED) | "1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 S.C(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The text does not describe the key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Numb(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | gemma | "Question: What legal issues were addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/20(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: According to the provided answer, the Supreme Court addressed the legal issues of constitut(...TRUNCATED) | What is the key legal issue addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016? | "The key legal issue addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 is the con(...TRUNCATED) | "What are the key legal issues being addressed in Supreme Court Appeal No. 8/2016, as described in t(...TRUNCATED) | "The key legal issues being addressed in Supreme Court Appeal No. 8/2016, as described in the provid(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The key legal issues addressed by the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 w(...TRUNCATED) | "In Case Number S.C Appeal No. 8/2016, the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka addressed several legal issues(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court case number S.C. Appeal No. 8/2016 was a dispute between two parties identified a(...TRUNCATED) | "[-6.0436248779296875, 0.507752537727356, -2.447779893875122, 0.701023519039154, 0.3876902759075165,(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.476231098175049, 0.1891508251428604, -0.18056555092334747, -0.08787747472524643, 2.360222578048(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.419314384460449, 1.6304776668548584, -1.9899556636810303, -1.0699834823608398, 0.51286542415618(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.98577356338501, 0.8408442139625549, -2.9449682235717773, 0.22580137848854065, -0.57292860746383(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.508997440338135, 0.41932204365730286, -2.704942226409912, 1.1138087511062622, 0.690361320972442(...TRUNCATED) | "[-6.3404154777526855, 1.1340529918670654, -2.7471866607666016, 0.5381278395652771, 0.45219597220420(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.3836750984191895, 0.9294747114181519, -2.070077419281006, 0.3197406828403473, 0.100705362856388(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.223681449890137, 1.381490707397461, -2.2711188793182373, -0.10247976332902908, -0.1409120857715(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.702629566192627, 0.7481474876403809, -1.8482894897460938, 0.329534113407135, 0.3142856061458587(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.608729362487793, 1.2585153579711914, -1.4406708478927612, -0.21180608868598938, -0.276862442493(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.2192816734313965, 1.4672155380249023, -1.2244200706481934, -0.674017071723938, 0.48750397562980(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.672337055206299, 0.574379563331604, -0.5366499423980713, -0.7557428479194641, 0.029252097010612(...TRUNCATED) | "[-2.6956512928009033, 0.7526388764381409, -1.4159877300262451, -1.3391168117523193, 0.3148921132087(...TRUNCATED) | 0.979243 | 0.994076 | 0.992953 | 0.978972 | 0.973018 | 0.975389 | 0.971308 | 0.988667 | 0.973238 | 0.929295 | 0.40612 | 0.65479 | 1.269636 | 0.776849 | 2.333333 | 1.913203 | 1.363532 | 0.988667 |
"What was the main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Su(...TRUNCATED) | "The main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Cou(...TRUNCATED) | "The Petitioner in this appeal is seeking to set aside the judgment of the High Court of Colombo by (...TRUNCATED) | "Based on the snippet, the main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 (...TRUNCATED) | 1 | gemma | "What was the basis on which the Ceylinco Insurance argued that the arbitrators had no jurisdiction (...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The basis on which the Ceylinco Insurance argued that the arbitrators had no jurisdiction t(...TRUNCATED) | "What is the issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme (...TRUNCATED) | "The issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Court of(...TRUNCATED) | "What was the key dispute in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 at the Supre(...TRUNCATED) | "The key dispute in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 at the Supreme Court (...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The main issue in the case before the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of(...TRUNCATED) | "The main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Cou(...TRUNCATED) | "The main issue in the case SC Appeal 101/05 SC Spl LA 201/05 HC /ARB 1961/04 before the Supreme Cou(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.954717636108398, 0.7106057405471802, -3.3969335556030273, -0.5380931496620178, 1.22669184207916(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.65217399597168, 0.308517724275589, -0.7459054589271545, -1.3655107021331787, 1.576403021812439,(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.787191867828369, 0.003993350081145763, -2.242114782333374, -0.513694167137146, 1.45078086853027(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.587933540344238, 0.2312852144241333, -2.6044044494628906, -0.34754154086112976, 0.1596664190292(...TRUNCATED) | "[-6.423748970031738, 0.795989990234375, -2.851139783859253, -0.3037831783294678, 1.4314844608306885(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.7758243083953857, 2.0890088081359863, -2.2901716232299805, -1.8106446266174316, -0.566454172134(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.851411819458008, 0.5375774502754211, -2.920661449432373, -0.6670829057693481, 1.287907481193542(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.758293628692627, 1.8115813732147217, -1.2556365728378296, -1.7872486114501953, 0.11550108343362(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.919397830963135, 0.17120172083377838, -2.3253955841064453, -0.26478272676467896, 0.956489443778(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.891656398773193, 0.7479601502418518, -1.5782299041748047, -1.1253836154937744, 0.77941715717315(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.179236888885498, 1.6667523384094238, -1.9228990077972412, -1.3376747369766235, 0.09820247441530(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.926959037780762, 0.07289648056030273, -2.590100049972534, 0.043595775961875916, 0.8491041064262(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.319334983825684, 0.2766965925693512, -2.019596576690674, -0.8162456154823303, 0.978959679603576(...TRUNCATED) | 0.987623 | 0.997368 | 0.920078 | 0.996382 | 0.987691 | 0.958008 | 0.993846 | 0.971276 | 0.979848 | 0.959739 | 0.233761 | 6.793754 | 0.360777 | 2.462764 | 2.348449 | 1.539585 | 1.131839 | 0.971276 |
"Who were the judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/20(...TRUNCATED) | "The judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 were D(...TRUNCATED) | "1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA --------------------------(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | gemma | What were the names of the judges who heard the Supreme Court case mentioned in the snippet? | "Answer: The names of the judges who heard the Supreme Court case mentioned in the snippet are Dr. S(...TRUNCATED) | What is the verdict of the Supreme Court in the case number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009? | "The verdict of the Supreme Court in the case number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 is as follows:\n\n1. The(...TRUNCATED) | What is the identities of the judges presiding over the Supreme Court case S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009? | "The judges presiding over the Supreme Court case S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 are Dr. Shirani A. Bandaran(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/200(...TRUNCATED) | "In Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009, the judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Sr(...TRUNCATED) | "The judges on the judicial panel for the Supreme Court in Case Number S.C. Appeal No. 2/2009 were D(...TRUNCATED) | "[-6.369625568389893, 0.6717339754104614, -2.7437803745269775, 0.2955779433250427, 0.297206014394760(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.386004447937012, 0.4499155879020691, -0.21355421841144562, -0.2219020426273346, 2.0872073173522(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.882360458374023, 0.11078283190727234, -0.9724130630493164, -0.6351401209831238, 0.5715597867965(...TRUNCATED) | "[-6.153138637542725, -0.12408749014139175, -1.7030810117721558, -0.8399791717529297, 0.665696740150(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.590275287628174, 0.8986712694168091, -3.024259328842163, 0.563174843788147, 0.3411896824836731,(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.5295186042785645, 1.5784832239151, -2.70326828956604, -2.1613450050354004, -1.893188714981079, (...TRUNCATED) | "[-6.310258388519287, 0.8347178101539612, -2.3385820388793945, -0.0911799818277359, 0.08548722416162(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.723226070404053, 0.16605359315872192, -1.7114064693450928, -1.4149917364120483, 0.7661433815956(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.7776899337768555, 0.6574350595474243, -1.2966675758361816, -0.8458360433578491, -0.373973369598(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.753503799438477, 0.10134705901145935, -1.1427637338638306, -0.6193673610687256, 0.6851594448089(...TRUNCATED) | "[-6.2958984375, 0.173308327794075, -1.3582420349121094, -0.7826720476150513, 0.785812497138977, -0.(...TRUNCATED) | "[-6.500588417053223, 0.10650204867124557, -0.9927710890769958, -0.6465796828269958, 1.8912771940231(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.882360458374023, 0.11078283190727234, -0.9724130630493164, -0.6351401209831238, 0.5715597867965(...TRUNCATED) | 0.988266 | 0.987508 | 0.912821 | 0.984746 | 0.976191 | 0.992498 | 1 | 0.961691 | 0.989563 | 0.933259 | 1.135194 | 6.139322 | 1.363088 | 2.879201 | 2.497315 | 1.235088 | 0.532908 | 0.961691 |
"What criteria did the Respondents rely on to counter the Petitioner's claim in the case SC APPLICAT(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008, the Respondents relied on the marking scheme annexed to t(...TRUNCATED) | "SPMDC than the 15th Respondent. In particular, he contended that the Petitioner was not awarded any(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe Respondents in the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008 relied on the marking scheme an(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | gemma | "What were the criteria in contention in the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008 regarding the award o(...TRUNCATED) | "Based on the provided snippet, the criteria in contention in the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008 (...TRUNCATED) | "What is the relevant experience of the petitioner in the position of Director of SPMDC, based on th(...TRUNCATED) | "The relevant experience of the petitioner in the position of Director of SPMDC, based on the inform(...TRUNCATED) | "What are the specific criteria in the marking scheme P6, annexed to the Petitioner's petition in ca(...TRUNCATED) | "The specific criteria in the marking scheme P6, which the Respondents are relying on to determine t(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: According to the snippet, the Respondents relied on the marking scheme annexed to the Petit(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008, the Respondents relied on the criteria of direct relevant(...TRUNCATED) | "The Respondents in the case SC APPLICATION (FR) 524/2008 countered the Petitioner's claim by relyin(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.8940799236297607, 1.5689473152160645, -2.1548850536346436, 0.08410318195819855, 0.9122244715690(...TRUNCATED) | "[-7.141401290893555, 0.6751269698143005, -1.280078649520874, -0.2057342678308487, -0.10061816126108(...TRUNCATED) | "[-6.603332996368408, 0.7013333439826965, -1.627237319946289, -0.13144320249557495, 0.06291703134775(...TRUNCATED) | "[-7.200081825256348, 0.8809481859207153, -2.0793025493621826, -0.36444222927093506, 0.0800123661756(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.895126819610596, 1.9649606943130493, -1.931789517402649, -0.6819294095039368, 0.065782099962234(...TRUNCATED) | "[-6.485975742340088, 0.6901563405990601, -2.4194819927215576, -0.7128751277923584, 0.10658942908048(...TRUNCATED) | "[-7.089556694030762, 0.8051405549049377, -1.7460225820541382, -0.32225319743156433, 0.0391859076917(...TRUNCATED) | "[-7.257765769958496, 0.5753647685050964, -2.3729724884033203, -0.11598381400108337, -0.408928692340(...TRUNCATED) | "[-6.107005596160889, 1.008315920829773, -1.2130950689315796, -0.2885119318962097, -0.08851155638694(...TRUNCATED) | "[-6.508640289306641, 0.9920128583908081, -1.593332290649414, -0.3898482918739319, -0.83085799217224(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.903765678405762, 0.7914100289344788, -1.6417940855026245, -0.6344508528709412, -0.2200109511613(...TRUNCATED) | "[-6.4449462890625, 0.36674952507019043, -1.8042246103286743, 0.876847505569458, 0.7088459730148315,(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.384443283081055, 1.1818246841430664, -1.2507108449935913, -0.3468700349330902, -0.0508269965648(...TRUNCATED) | 0.990762 | 0.950071 | 0.975124 | 0.978836 | 0.989914 | 0.984649 | 0.989616 | 0.96801 | 0.98806 | 0.967126 | 3.252163 | 2.36424 | 1.595679 | 2.404027 | 2.420945 | 0.679654 | 0.24861 | 0.96801 |
"What was the defendant-appellant-appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the Distri(...TRUNCATED) | "The defendant-appellant-appellant argued that he had prescriptive title to the land and the right t(...TRUNCATED) | "Learned President’s Counsel for the respondents contended that the respondents, being the plainti(...TRUNCATED) | "answer:\n\nThe defendant-appellant-appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the Dist(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | gemma | "What was the respondents' argument regarding the defendant-appellant's claim to the land in the Dis(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: According to the snippet, the respondents' argument was that they had traced their title to(...TRUNCATED) | "What is the appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the District Court of Negombo c(...TRUNCATED) | "The appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the District Court of Negombo case is t(...TRUNCATED) | "What were the arguments made by the defendant-appellant in the District Court of Negombo case regar(...TRUNCATED) | "The defendant-appellant in the District Court of Negombo case argued for his right to the land base(...TRUNCATED) | "answer: According to the snippet, the defendant-appellant-appellant's argument in the District Cour(...TRUNCATED) | "The defendant-appellant's argument regarding his right to the land in the District Court of Negombo(...TRUNCATED) | "The appellant argued that he had prescriptive title to the land in question, known as Muthurajawela(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.623962879180908, 1.768197774887085, -2.331298589706421, -1.0637396574020386, -0.139985904097557(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.1737241744995117, 0.9211351275444031, -0.9971815347671509, -2.312808036804199, 0.54532456398010(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.716269493103027, 1.4724750518798828, -0.8133770823478699, -1.7765257358551025, 0.66652828454971(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.0603766441345215, 1.3045504093170166, -0.856937825679779, -1.760780930519104, 0.780234694480896(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.2510600090026855, 2.0305631160736084, -1.561193585395813, -0.9093908071517944, 0.24670813977718(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.9618594646453857, 1.6501981019973755, -2.639725685119629, -1.532017469406128, -0.58704721927642(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.1062703132629395, 2.3983919620513916, -1.8177077770233154, -2.0084798336029053, 0.0343900471925(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.376436233520508, 0.4610268473625183, -1.2347522974014282, -1.8854665756225586, 0.17794647812843(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.1851515769958496, 0.3378659784793854, -0.26723361015319824, -1.8531768321990967, 0.534361958503(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.269289016723633, 1.2851656675338745, -0.516967236995697, -1.882502555847168, 0.3323886692523956(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.236265182495117, 1.5013070106506348, -1.053146481513977, -1.8076668977737427, 0.854352116584777(...TRUNCATED) | "[-2.2323014736175537, 0.3007661998271942, -0.9685955047607422, -2.2139430046081543, 0.6338467001914(...TRUNCATED) | "[-2.798630714416504, 0.9486615657806396, -0.6813982725143433, -1.8463352918624878, 0.43484717607498(...TRUNCATED) | 0.99046 | 0.992416 | 0.993042 | 0.982039 | 0.973474 | 0.990639 | 0.99213 | 0.989165 | 0.985414 | 0.957902 | 0.486555 | 0.43572 | 1.020482 | 0.647586 | 2.339072 | 1.784127 | 1.459845 | 0.989165 |
"What was the Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the P(...TRUNCATED) | "In Case Number SC Appeal 13/2016, the Supreme Court disagreed with the position taken by the Court (...TRUNCATED) | "She may have acted on cumulative provocation, still for all, it cannot be counted as sudden provoca(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | gemma | "What is the Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the Pe(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the Pe(...TRUNCATED) | "What is the proper interpretation of the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the Pen(...TRUNCATED) | "The proper interpretation of the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the Penal Code (...TRUNCATED) | "What is the correct interpretation of section 297 of the Penal Code regarding the Accused-Appellant(...TRUNCATED) | "Based on the provided snippet and question, it appears that the Accused-Appellant is being tried un(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer: The Supreme Court's stance on the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 297 of the Pe(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court held that the Appellant's act of committing the alleged offence cannot be classif(...TRUNCATED) | "The Supreme Court did not directly answer the question regarding the Court of Appeal's interpretati(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.8459954261779785, 1.4566702842712402, -1.9976872205734253, 0.2736140787601471, 0.52739590406417(...TRUNCATED) | "[-2.463759422302246, 1.0138517618179321, -1.6918749809265137, -0.7761945128440857, 0.42014330625534(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.504812479019165, 0.07753840833902359, -0.6134682297706604, 0.1334613710641861, 0.34470954537391(...TRUNCATED) | "[-2.566725254058838, 1.2574864625930786, -1.6066561937332153, -0.22517938911914825, 0.1384576261043(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.0378313064575195, 1.8901435136795044, -1.656295895576477, -0.21398629248142242, 0.1172265559434(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.637444019317627, 1.63259756565094, -1.7430734634399414, 0.342890202999115, 0.6461913585662842, (...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.120359182357788, 1.3408799171447754, -1.904427409172058, -0.2361610233783722, -0.12717391550540(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.019118309020996, 0.9549530744552612, -1.3834285736083984, 0.22485387325286865, 0.42055478692054(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.847358465194702, 0.4831332266330719, -1.3407000303268433, 0.30214542150497437, 0.62460553646087(...TRUNCATED) | "[-1.1832941770553589, 1.0530601739883423, -0.87503981590271, -0.2626422941684723, 0.303284019231796(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.139982223510742, 1.1333075761795044, -1.6324574947357178, -0.2915537357330322, 0.39975786209106(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.246272325515747, 1.0311243534088135, -1.4182207584381104, -1.037198543548584, -0.00901814550161(...TRUNCATED) | "[-1.2626221179962158, 1.0510601997375488, -1.3100075721740723, -0.3645898103713989, 0.1381077021360(...TRUNCATED) | 0.98983 | 0.980584 | 0.998013 | 0.971451 | 0.984463 | 0.990321 | 0.989497 | 0.983349 | 0.988094 | 0.958524 | 1.54675 | 0.181558 | 2.288814 | 1.339041 | 2.356056 | 1.592322 | 1.36496 | 0.983349 |
"In the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, what was the main issue in (...TRUNCATED) | "In the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, the main issue in the case (...TRUNCATED) | "have fulfilled the requirements of the Circular P3. If not for the restrictions contained in P4B an(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 in the Supreme Court of the Democra(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | gemma | "What is the main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 according to the snippet provided in t(...TRUNCATED) | "main issue: The main issue in the case is the violation of the fundamental rights of the petitioner(...TRUNCATED) | "What is the distance from the school to the petitioners' residence and why was the admission to the(...TRUNCATED) | "The distance from the school to the petitioners' residence is 1.2 kilometers. The reason for the ad(...TRUNCATED) | "What was the reason for the denial of admission to Mahamaya Vidyalaya for the children of the petit(...TRUNCATED) | "The denial of admission to Mahamaya Vidyalaya for the children of the petitioners was due to the re(...TRUNCATED) | "answer: The main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 was the interpretation of Circular P3 (...TRUNCATED) | "In the Supreme Court of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, the main issue in the case (...TRUNCATED) | "The main issue in the case SC FR Application 41/2016 in the Supreme Court of the Democratic Sociali(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.09332799911499, 0.5369220972061157, -1.0765575170516968, -0.8517875075340271, 1.148682236671447(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.005329132080078, 0.41072142124176025, -0.5137366652488708, -1.741467833518982, -0.1318543851375(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.537060022354126, 0.9560176730155945, -0.9879475235939026, -1.5288935899734497, -0.1058184579014(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.790957450866699, 1.2496302127838135, -1.660454273223877, -0.8293373584747314, -1.04370188713073(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.648149490356445, 0.722766637802124, -1.5092360973358154, -2.8623595237731934, -0.92165488004684(...TRUNCATED) | "[-7.017192840576172, 0.8353865146636963, -3.053110122680664, -0.30649447441101074, -0.2216876149177(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.120098114013672, 0.7734730839729309, -3.072554349899292, -1.4319994449615479, -0.28784242272377(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.527496814727783, 1.6618881225585938, -1.789684772491455, -0.5214461088180542, 0.350785374641418(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.666231632232666, 1.1746816635131836, -0.7440311312675476, -1.3946452140808105, -0.6033473610877(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.1637964248657227, 0.3803764283657074, -1.5041732788085938, -1.6604642868041992, -0.876489520072(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.7131803035736084, 1.1877012252807617, -1.6693001985549927, -0.7962636947631836, -0.473484784364(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.260167360305786, 1.2078979015350342, -0.959345817565918, -1.7146140336990356, -0.12315669655799(...TRUNCATED) | "[-3.048596143722534, 0.9640716314315796, -1.623526930809021, -1.4344284534454346, 0.299779206514358(...TRUNCATED) | 0.980573 | 0.937206 | 0.957312 | 0.960101 | 0.992856 | 0.984292 | 0.990623 | 0.951539 | 0.989257 | 0.948555 | 4.059293 | 3.299512 | 2.136139 | 3.164981 | 2.475879 | 0.853272 | 0.436894 | 0.951539 |
"What were the preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the case SC Appeal No(...TRUNCATED) | "In the case SC Appeal No. 85/2004, the Petitioners-Respondents raised two preliminary objections: ((...TRUNCATED) | "Counsel for the Petitioners-Respondents (hereinafter referred to as the Respondents) moved to raise(...TRUNCATED) | "Answer:\n\nThe preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in the case SC Appeal N(...TRUNCATED) | 1 | gemma | "Question: What was the basis of the preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in(...TRUNCATED) | "Based on the provided snippet, the basis of the preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Re(...TRUNCATED) | "What is the proper procedure for resolving disputes between the petitioners and the respondents in (...TRUNCATED) | "The proper procedure for resolving disputes between the petitioners and the respondents in light of(...TRUNCATED) | "What were the specific Rules of the Supreme Court Rules, 1990 cited by the Petitioners-Respondents (...TRUNCATED) | "The Petitioners-Respondents raised two preliminary objections in SC Appeal No. 85/2004 based on the(...TRUNCATED) | "Based on the provided snippet, the preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents in (...TRUNCATED) | "The preliminary objections raised by the Petitioners-Respondents are that the appeal is time-barred(...TRUNCATED) | "The Petitioners-Respondents raised two preliminary objections in SC Appeal No. 85/2004. The first o(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.69058084487915, 1.5133038759231567, -2.881528615951538, 0.0759059339761734, 0.3102544844150543,(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.035001277923584, 0.41113972663879395, -0.3038419783115387, -0.9485644698143005, 0.9069325327873(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.012033462524414, 0.640648365020752, -1.144421935081482, -0.4610355794429779, 0.7444230914115906(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.649969577789307, 0.9057018160820007, -1.8955177068710327, -0.4505027234554291, 0.53247439861297(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.28448486328125, 0.5656035542488098, -1.356959342956543, -1.462664008140564, 0.6553133726119995,(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.3871541023254395, 1.448189616203308, -2.970917224884033, -0.3862459063529968, 0.171528786420822(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.475643157958984, 0.7047001719474792, -3.012907028198242, -0.8553863167762756, 0.661018610000610(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.035248279571533, 0.6974828839302063, -1.2752517461776733, -0.5269970297813416, 0.37621706724166(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.568425178527832, -0.3162766098976135, -0.6095357537269592, -1.1710400581359863, 0.2245573997497(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.260504245758057, 0.8785515427589417, -0.7956997156143188, -1.1757268905639648, 0.35510826110839(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.657387733459473, 0.7983837723731995, -1.4129741191864014, -0.34580013155937195, 0.4107292294502(...TRUNCATED) | "[-5.096688270568848, 0.6402507424354553, -1.091208815574646, -0.7063536047935486, 0.461968034505844(...TRUNCATED) | "[-4.9597601890563965, 0.8672448992729187, -0.38742196559906006, -0.638779878616333, 0.6776053309440(...TRUNCATED) | 0.986892 | 0.960305 | 0.988903 | 0.986973 | 0.98285 | 0.995209 | 0.991747 | 0.978727 | 0.989936 | 0.964794 | 2.967285 | 0.926982 | 0.91571 | 1.603325 | 2.333333 | 1.266175 | 0.783365 | 0.978727 |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 55