question
stringlengths
57
372
answer
stringlengths
77
1.64k
snippet
stringlengths
265
2.04k
answerMistral
stringlengths
94
2.29k
question_answerMistral_llama
stringlengths
62
1.18k
question_answerMistral_gemma
stringlengths
50
1.05k
question_answerMistral_falcon
stringlengths
32
2.51k
reverse_answer_answerMistral_gemma
stringlengths
72
1.08k
reverse_answer_answerMistral_falcon
stringlengths
13
3.34k
reverse_answer_answerMistral_llama
stringlengths
14
2.26k
question_emb
stringlengths
16.4k
16.6k
snippet_emb
stringlengths
16.4k
16.6k
answer_emb
stringlengths
16.4k
16.6k
answerMistral_emb
stringlengths
16.4k
16.6k
question_answerMistral_llama_emb
stringlengths
16.4k
16.6k
question_answerMistral_gemma_emb
stringlengths
16.4k
16.6k
question_answerMistral_falcon_emb
stringlengths
16.4k
16.6k
reverse_answer_answerMistral_gemma_emb
stringlengths
16.4k
16.6k
reverse_answer_answerMistral_falcon_emb
stringlengths
16.3k
16.6k
reverse_answer_answerMistral_llama_emb
stringlengths
16.4k
16.6k
question_answerMistral_llama_cos
float64
0.94
1
question_answerMistral_gemma_cos
float64
0.93
1
question_answerMistral_falcon_cos
float64
0.88
1
question_answerMistral_cos_mean
float64
0.93
1
question_snippet_similarity
float64
0.84
0.99
iaa_fleiss_kappa
float64
0
1
question_reconstruction_llama_error
float64
0
0.04
question_reconstruction_gemma_error
float64
0
0.05
question_reconstruction_falcon_error
float64
0
0.07
question_reconstruction_error_mean
float64
0
0.04
case_alignment_reverse_gen
float64
0.93
1
gold_standard_cos
float64
0.9
1
cos_mean_case_alignment_score
float64
0.94
1
cos_mean_diff
float64
0
0.09
case_alignment_diff
float64
0
0.05
cos_mean_case_alignment_diff
float64
0
0.08
question_bm25_score_mean
float64
2.33
3.92
question_rouge_score_mean
float64
0.33
2.31
question_bleu_score_mean
float64
0.01
2.16
case_alignment_gold_standard
float64
0.94
1
iaa_fleiss_kappa_agreement
float64
0
1
iaa_fleiss_kappa_disagreement
float64
0
1
"In the case of Nasr v NRMA Insurance [2006] NSWSC 1018, why was the plaintiff's appeal lodged out o(...TRUNCATED)
"In Nasr v NRMA Insurance [2006] NSWSC 1018, the plaintiff's appeal was lodged out of time because t(...TRUNCATED)
" 3 The plaintiff claims that he was overseas when the Local Court struck out his case against the N(...TRUNCATED)
"The plaintiff, Mr. Nasr, lodged his appeal out of time in the case of Nasr v NRMA Insurance [2006] (...TRUNCATED)
"What reasons did Mr. Nasr provide for the delay in lodging his appeal, and why did the court declin(...TRUNCATED)
**Question:** Why was Mr. Nasr's appeal lodged out of time in this case?
"What were the grounds of Mr Nasr's appeal against the NRMA and why was his case denied procedural f(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nMr. Nasr's appeal was lodged out of time because the summons was filed seven months out (...TRUNCATED)
"Mr Nasr took these steps to ensure that the NRMA properly adjudicated his claim and to lodge his ap(...TRUNCATED)
"Mr. Nasr provided the following reasons for the delay in lodging his appeal:\n\n1. He was overseas (...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.0003663391980808228, 0.10694155842065811, 0.16223549842834473, 0.13185618817806244, 0.27726718(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.04459015652537346, 0.09297605603933334, 0.028804287314414978, -0.21957169473171234, 0.156894385(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.024238958954811096, 0.07126660645008087, 0.09102443605661392, 0.015993520617485046, 0.021830486(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.04276175796985626, 0.13825446367263794, 0.025396494194865227, -0.15696653723716736, 0.069174587(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.05652689188718796, 0.1623169183731079, -0.04481109231710434, -0.10202887654304504, 0.0487960614(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.04794885963201523, 0.11806745082139969, 0.09589329361915588, 0.08791603893041611, 0.3890654742(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.004248026758432388, 0.12622183561325073, -0.00202866829931736, -0.12343667447566986, 0.17889750(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.03598306328058243, 0.12869733572006226, 0.0728679746389389, -0.11022508889436722, 0.11955417692(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.028088370338082314, 0.11432040482759476, 0.04609527438879013, -0.14193257689476013, 0.077818870(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.025502875447273254, 0.13688918948173523, 0.019526619464159012, -0.13823476433753967, 0.18159255(...TRUNCATED)
0.979332
0.978745
0.965755
0.974611
0.934373
1
0.012844
0.013804
0.021744
0.016131
0.976194
0.971635
0.975403
0.002976
0.00303
0.003768
2.381852
0.72517
0.251545
0.979225
1
0
"In the case of R v NGUYEN [2001] NSWCCA 334, what was the relationship between the Appellant and Mr(...TRUNCATED)
"In the case of R v NGUYEN [2001] NSWCCA 334, the Appellant testified that Mr Nguyen was her cousin (...TRUNCATED)
" 29 The Appellant also gave evidence that she had permitted Mr Nguyen to live in the flat for about(...TRUNCATED)
"The Appellant in the case of R v NGUYEN [2001] NSWCCA 334 testified that Mr. Nguyen was her cousin (...TRUNCATED)
"What reasons did the Appellant give for not taking any further steps to prevent Mr. Nguyen's heroin(...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What was the relationship between the Appellant and Mr. Nguyen, and what was the natu(...TRUNCATED)
"What were the Appellant's reasons for allowing Mr. Nguyen to live in her flat, knowing that he was (...TRUNCATED)
"Based on the snippet, the relationship between the Appellant and Mr. Nguyen was close, as he was he(...TRUNCATED)
"The Appellant's reasons for allowing Mr. Nguyen to live in her flat, knowing that he was involved i(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: According to the Appellant, she took no further steps to prevent Mr. Nguyen's heroin dealin(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.08504614979028702, -0.040588248521089554, 0.06860177963972092, -0.11192915588617325, 0.3815904(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.06939397007226944, 0.11543332785367966, 0.03368489444255829, -0.19513584673404694, 0.1284731626(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.06652369350194931, 0.11187534779310226, 0.042015690356492996, -0.18254075944423676, 0.179011270(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.06905581802129745, 0.14738279581069946, 0.04028267785906792, -0.08468975126743317, 0.2557866871(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.04779791086912155, 0.1554633527994156, 0.011323737911880016, -0.021953273564577103, 0.313867688(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.06003870442509651, 0.009793898090720177, -0.028728771954774857, 0.03174230083823204, 0.2698802(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.022539369761943817, 0.05732125788927078, -0.014875277876853943, -0.011340445838868618, 0.406157(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.02014191634953022, 0.1404910832643509, 0.04373046010732651, -0.15852978825569153, 0.23043689131(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.05041845887899399, 0.2117733657360077, 0.011177603155374527, -0.15611869096755981, 0.3991479575(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.07141483575105667, 0.1608009934425354, -0.03159695863723755, -0.11406334489583969, 0.1897477358(...TRUNCATED)
0.980555
0.98566
0.982856
0.983024
0.885211
1
0.013798
0.010224
0.012151
0.012058
0.955687
0.974323
0.969355
0.008701
0.024322
0.004968
2.333333
0.737596
0.283802
0.980009
1
0
"In the case of Moore v Scenic Tours Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 237, what was the court's decision regardi(...TRUNCATED)
"In the case of Moore v Scenic Tours Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 237, the court decided to dismiss the moti(...TRUNCATED)
"Medium Neutral Citation: Moore v Scenic Tours Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 237 Hearing dates: 27 February 2(...TRUNCATED)
"The court in the case of Moore v Scenic Tours Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 237 dismissed the motion to rest(...TRUNCATED)
"What was the court's reasoning for dismissing the motion to restrain the law firm from acting on be(...TRUNCATED)
**Question:** What was the question asked regarding the snippet?
"What was the outcome of the motion to restrain the law firm from acting on behalf of the plaintiff (...TRUNCATED)
"**Answer:**\n\nThe question asked regarding the snippet was \"What was the question asked regarding(...TRUNCATED)
"In the case of Moore v Scenic Tours Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 237, the New South Wales Supreme Court dis(...TRUNCATED)
"Based on the snippet provided, the court dismissed the motion to restrain the law firm from acting (...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.012077927589416504, 0.06227419152855873, 0.04145142063498497, 0.07274756580591202, 0.0448586381(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.04243961721658707, 0.13026335835456848, 0.04479347914457321, -0.0012712064199149609, 0.0394926(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.0332767590880394, 0.18894906342029572, 0.04761788249015808, -0.12202084064483643, -0.2026218175(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.028329122811555862, 0.12515893578529358, 0.032949455082416534, -0.08255927264690399, -0.017248(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.009624791331589222, 0.03374277427792549, 0.03132430091500282, 0.11610398441553116, 0.0267874654(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.03966948762536049, -0.15995003283023834, 0.06714841723442078, 0.07015089690685272, 0.3911329507(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.04325485974550247, 0.035579927265644073, 0.06068386510014534, 0.1289452165365219, 0.0586062781(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.04269411042332649, 0.00933108665049076, 0.050970420241355896, -0.09052462875843048, -0.01547861(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.012302925810217857, 0.12125586718320847, 0.019789088517427444, -0.14327162504196167, -0.0408551(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.041436899453401566, 0.12915894389152527, 0.05952158570289612, -0.1547723412513733, -0.121378831(...TRUNCATED)
0.995793
0.953754
0.99507
0.981539
0.948017
0.333333
0.002732
0.029785
0.003331
0.011949
0.98433
0.985493
0.982934
0.003954
0.003143
0.002558
2.599369
0.84117
0.689288
0.981187
0.333333
0.666667
"What were the circumstances and outcomes of the case Inspector Phillip Estreich v Hannas Civil Engi(...TRUNCATED)
"In the case of Inspector Phillip Estreich v Hannas Civil Engineering Pty Ltd and Afram Hanna [2009](...TRUNCATED)
" CITATION: Inspector Phillip Estreich v Hannas Civil Engineering Pty Ltd and Afram Hanna [2009] NSW(...TRUNCATED)
"In the case of Inspector Phillip Estreich v Hannas Civil Engineering Pty Ltd and Afram Hanna [2009](...TRUNCATED)
"What penalties were imposed on the defendants in the case of Inspector Phillip Estreich v Hannas Ci(...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What was the primary issue addressed in the case of Inspector Phillip Estreich v Hann(...TRUNCATED)
"What were the specific measures taken by the company in response to the 2009 occupational health an(...TRUNCATED)
"Based on the snippet, the primary issue addressed in the case of Inspector Phillip Estreich v Hanna(...TRUNCATED)
"In response to the 2009 occupational health and safety incident with CITATION: Inspector Phillip Es(...TRUNCATED)
"Based on the snippet provided, the penalties imposed on the defendants in the case of Inspector Phi(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.11757989972829819, 0.1397070586681366, -0.07622575014829636, 0.05730852857232094, 0.3640895187(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.08082069456577301, 0.11443843692541122, -0.054568201303482056, -0.10235697776079178, 0.4022037(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.08575639128684998, 0.1753290444612503, -0.03559712693095207, -0.2507128119468689, 0.1801237314(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.06653670966625214, 0.1462382674217224, -0.024560343474149704, -0.2098364531993866, 0.259325295(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.21259614825248718, 0.22271737456321716, -0.10194529592990875, -0.05313323438167572, 0.31194424(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.1259813755750656, 0.1183081716299057, -0.055219486355781555, 0.0561365969479084, 0.38973432779(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.04547448083758354, 0.25697797536849976, -0.06959806382656097, -0.17775295674800873, 0.00901653(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.09171745181083679, 0.1437901109457016, -0.016593707725405693, -0.17512409389019012, 0.28824007(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.02295535057783127, 0.2186359018087387, -0.10712263733148575, -0.15643824636936188, 0.0680142566(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.08329097181558609, 0.257514625787735, -0.038420844823122025, -0.1536881923675537, 0.1316043138(...TRUNCATED)
0.992464
0.992854
0.935957
0.973759
0.946212
1
0.004515
0.004281
0.038377
0.015724
0.958444
0.97325
0.966101
0.000508
0.018582
0.007149
2.333333
1.102844
0.756524
0.977026
1
0
"In the case of Ruddock v Vadarlis [2001] FCA 1329, what was the argument of the Commonwealth regard(...TRUNCATED)
"In Ruddock v Vadarlis [2001] FCA 1329, the Commonwealth argued that habeas corpus did not apply as (...TRUNCATED)
" 206 It was submitted for the Commonwealth that habeas corpus did not lie as the rescuees were not (...TRUNCATED)
"In the case of Ruddock v Vadarlis [2001] FCA 1329, the Commonwealth argued that habeas corpus did n(...TRUNCATED)
"What was the legal argument made by the Commonwealth in the case of Ruddock v Vadarlis, and how did(...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** Does the partial restraint of the rescuees in the case of Ruddock v Vadarlis [2001] F(...TRUNCATED)
"What is the proper legal interpretation of the given snippet and answer in regards to habeas corpus(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nThe partial restraint of the rescuees in the case of Ruddock v Vadarlis [2001] FCA 1329 (...TRUNCATED)
"Based on the facts of the case, it appears that the rescuees were subject to a limitation on their (...TRUNCATED)
"response: The legal argument made by the Commonwealth in the case of Ruddock v Vadarlis was that ha(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.01746833324432373, 0.06606607139110565, 0.03263052925467491, -0.010489691980183125, 0.263523787(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.008194215595722198, 0.13192377984523773, 0.10420765727758408, -0.27155768871307373, 0.156668558(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.021606242284178734, 0.14894305169582367, 0.08684991300106049, -0.23653370141983032, 0.061510808(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.003887610975652933, 0.17086707055568695, 0.06080015376210213, -0.2752988636493683, 0.079257100(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.08705347776412964, 0.09575843065977097, 0.042329806834459305, -0.08672532439231873, 0.073749542(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.06634479761123657, -0.01694791205227375, -0.01693645305931568, -0.0019406115170568228, 0.21591(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.02554403990507126, 0.0858248695731163, 0.05752665549516678, -0.1255095899105072, 0.159770891070(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.0028462535701692104, 0.15325358510017395, 0.06345609575510025, -0.20415326952934265, 0.02200262(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.010893688537180424, 0.16145993769168854, 0.07019402831792831, -0.259082555770874, 0.21740478277(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.05342341959476471, 0.15204885601997375, 0.04781614616513252, -0.25457772612571716, 0.1358436048(...TRUNCATED)
0.989583
0.986069
0.963118
0.97959
0.945968
1
0.006376
0.008678
0.023438
0.012831
0.979729
0.988014
0.97966
0.008424
0.006507
0.008354
2.333333
0.781769
0.43553
0.986236
1
0
When did the Poisons List Amendment Order 2012 come into effect in Tasmania?
"The Poisons List Amendment Order 2012 in Tasmania took effect on the day its making was notified in(...TRUNCATED)
"Poisons List Amendment Order 2012 I make the following order under section 15(1) of the Poisons Act(...TRUNCATED)
"The Poisons List Amendment Order 2012 came into effect on May 9, 2012, in Tasmania. The effective d(...TRUNCATED)
"What was the effective date of the Poisons List Amendment Order 2012 in Tasmania, according to the (...TRUNCATED)
**Question:** What is the effective date of the Poisons List Amendment Order 2012?
What is the effective date of the Poisons List Amendment Order 2012?
"Answer:\n\n**Answer:** The effective date of the Poisons List Amendment Order 2012 is the day on wh(...TRUNCATED)
The effective date of the Poisons List Amendment Order 2012 is 2 May 2012.
"According to the Poisons List Amendment Order 2012, the effective date of the order in Tasmania is (...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.06846010684967041, -0.035387828946113586, 0.062468208372592926, -0.050980549305677414, 0.11660(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.00844112690538168, 0.0903647169470787, 0.06246873736381531, 0.045808542519807816, 0.0234867930(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.002015224192291498, -0.005921447649598122, 0.03900168091058731, 0.1328190565109253, 0.046219814(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.009906460531055927, 0.18662844598293304, 0.05802128463983536, 0.11787749826908112, 0.079941377(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.017397325485944748, -0.03534916788339615, 0.01044896338135004, 0.1501135230064392, 0.126141801(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.04128264635801315, -0.06549788266420364, 0.019136959686875343, 0.23552711308002472, 0.30102643(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.049138106405735016, -0.02900760993361473, 0.010857900604605675, 0.13777630031108856, 0.3311774(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.05315874516963959, 0.09538991004228592, 0.014043020084500313, 0.23648260533809662, -0.055764697(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.05675357207655907, 0.006338371895253658, -0.058891814202070236, 0.3084104359149933, 0.12668555(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.02665405534207821, -0.014968331903219223, 0.002174926223233342, 0.0935763567686081, -0.0704666(...TRUNCATED)
0.988102
0.982624
0.98798
0.986236
0.924724
1
0.007704
0.011773
0.00774
0.009073
0.98347
0.98646
0.984853
0.000225
0.001474
0.001607
2.543021
1.098401
0.703794
0.984945
1
0
"Who were the defendants in the case Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Letten (No 2(...TRUNCATED)
"In the case Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Letten (No 24) [2014] FCA 1322, the (...TRUNCATED)
"SIMMS INVESTMENTS PTY LTD (ACN 093 504 511) Sixteenth Defendant SY21 RETAIL PTY LTD (ACN 107 874 56(...TRUNCATED)
"The defendants in the case Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Letten (No 24) [2014](...TRUNCATED)
"What were the names of the thirty-one companies involved in the Australian Securities and Investmen(...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What was the number of defendants in the case Australian Securities and Investments C(...TRUNCATED)
What is the name of the remaining twenty-one companies in the list?
"Answer:\n\nThe provided text lists a total of 32 defendants in the case Australian Securities and I(...TRUNCATED)
"The remaining twenty-one companies in the list are:\n\n1. ADINA RISE PTY LTD (ACN 089 906 543)\n2. (...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: The names of the thirty-one companies involved in the Australian Securities and Investments(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.08566290140151978, 0.005661445669829845, 0.025685343891382217, -0.06884199380874634, 0.0119843(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.12700963020324707, 0.04454556480050087, 0.04385078698396683, -0.047216951847076416, 0.40648281(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.12857508659362793, 0.03182358294725418, 0.18165874481201172, 0.01023795735090971, 0.3259906172(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.05313272401690483, 0.029014242812991142, 0.04247133061289787, -0.03972123935818672, 0.42215684(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.06189342960715294, 0.02922031469643116, 0.07643873989582062, -0.06541713327169418, -0.00030476(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.016164056956768036, -0.007860084064304829, 0.05774880573153496, -0.03118894249200821, 0.044903(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.07429882884025574, 0.01883171685039997, 0.1333150565624237, 0.040004655718803406, 0.0278632361(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.08181998878717422, 0.013954353518784046, 0.0828661397099495, 0.014587813057005405, -0.08883466(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.057696469128131866, 0.0581023283302784, 0.027789469808340073, -0.020936191082000732, 0.2132903(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.1513095498085022, 0.15008778870105743, 0.17574968934059143, 0.0012401778949424624, 0.207417488(...TRUNCATED)
0.990963
0.991322
0.963896
0.98206
0.901485
1
0.005517
0.005374
0.021803
0.010898
0.966364
0.974002
0.974212
0.008059
0.00355
0.00021
2.634128
1.124238
0.677438
0.962813
1
0
"What changes were made in the amendment AD/BAe 146/104 Amdt 1 to the British Aerospace BAe 146 Seri(...TRUNCATED)
"The amendment AD/BAe 146/104 Amdt 1 to the British Aerospace BAe 146 Series Aeroplanes Airworthines(...TRUNCATED)
" British Aerospace BAe 146 Series Aeroplanes AD/BAe 146/104 Amdt 1 (continued) This Amendment chang(...TRUNCATED)
"The amendment AD/BAe 146/104 Amdt 1 to the British Aerospace BAe 146 Series Aeroplanes Airworthines(...TRUNCATED)
"What is the purpose of the amendment AD/BAe 146/104 Amdt 1 to the British Aerospace BAe 146 Series (...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What was the purpose of the amendment AD/BAe 146/104 Amdt 1 to the British Aerospace (...TRUNCATED)
"What is the purpose of the amendment to the British Aerospace BAe 146 Series Aeroplanes AD/BAe 146/(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\n**Answer:** The purpose of the amendment AD/BAe 146/104 Amdt 1 to the British Aerospace (...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: The purpose of the amendment to the British Aerospace BAe 146 Series Aeroplanes AD/BAe 146/(...TRUNCATED)
"Based on the snippet provided, the purpose of the amendment AD/BAe 146/104 Amdt 1 to the British Ae(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.025116290897130966, 0.12175457924604416, -0.05700297653675079, 0.11501921713352203, 0.37309274(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.03459291532635689, 0.19331340491771698, -0.0032489695586264133, 0.10117129981517792, 0.0888159(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.009509784169495106, 0.1387748122215271, -0.06456981599330902, 0.13208189606666565, 0.219330579(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.013616404496133327, 0.1965288519859314, -0.02114257588982582, 0.029453443363308907, 0.083923712(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.03103114664554596, 0.13436226546764374, -0.04630453139543533, 0.17150624096393585, 0.367349892(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.027825310826301575, 0.09074018150568008, -0.07819399982690811, 0.23722133040428162, 0.36720567(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.03930201381444931, 0.15817755460739136, -0.011510973796248436, 0.08024728298187256, 0.234241575(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.0707186684012413, 0.12182115763425827, -0.0739588737487793, 0.2057250738143921, 0.1723953336477(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.013508575968444347, 0.19938836991786957, -0.0004882921930402517, -0.04549127444624901, 0.021474(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.06645219773054123, 0.16946972906589508, -0.029907353222370148, 0.08526611328125, 0.100768119096(...TRUNCATED)
0.99636
0.993476
0.986259
0.992032
0.97417
0.333333
0.002113
0.003931
0.008054
0.004699
0.990255
0.991223
0.991143
0.000809
0.001358
0.00008
2.348954
1.469838
1.152222
0.991613
0.666667
0.333333
"What is the landlord's general obligation under section 63 of the Act in the case of Anderson v Arm(...TRUNCATED)
"In the case of Anderson v Armitage [2014] NSWCATCD 157, under section 63 of the Act, a landlord in (...TRUNCATED)
"reasons for decision 1The applicant leased premises from the respondent. The fixed term of the resi(...TRUNCATED)
"The landlord's general obligation under section 63 of the Act in the case of Anderson v Armitage [2(...TRUNCATED)
"Question: What is the landlord's general obligation under section 63 of the Act in the case of Ande(...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What is the landlord's general obligation under section 63 of the Act in the case of (...TRUNCATED)
"What is the Tribunal's power to order a landlord to repair and maintain their residential premises,(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nAccording to section 63 of the Act in the case of Anderson v Armitage [2014] NSWCATCD 15(...TRUNCATED)
"The Tribunal's power to order a landlord to repair and maintain their residential premises includes(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: According to section 63 of the Act, the landlord has a general obligation to provide and ma(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.09319578111171722, -0.13046200573444366, 0.00762961758300662, -0.12560681998729706, 0.31736707(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-5.527406756300479e-05, 0.1046440452337265, 0.009086770005524158, -0.2227761149406433, 0.18964935(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.01749117113649845, 0.0715373083949089, 0.018030237406492233, -0.3027338981628418, 0.1809018850(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.006145460996776819, 0.07225177437067032, 0.01391155831515789, -0.27005746960639954, 0.146654203(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.054895829409360886, -0.056107789278030396, 0.012093987315893173, -0.15142101049423218, 0.33417(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.09423781931400299, -0.14442646503448486, 0.005439306143671274, -0.07275751233100891, 0.3269521(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.03530285879969597, 0.003889513900503516, -0.05950829014182091, -0.21547093987464905, 0.11853924(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.02363516204059124, 0.03773748502135277, 0.030957264825701714, -0.2139890193939209, 0.064740382(...TRUNCATED)
"[[0.01378774456679821, 0.17380695044994354, 0.03846839442849159, -0.29698818922042847, -0.021899338(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.0007221409468911588, 0.11292801797389984, 0.03430282697081566, -0.3061939775943756, 0.15941068(...TRUNCATED)
0.994863
0.996462
0.979939
0.990422
0.891401
0.333333
0.003321
0.002353
0.013027
0.006233
0.992015
0.999087
0.991218
0.008665
0.000234
0.007869
2.333333
1.454557
1.075998
0.991781
0.333333
0.666667
"What were the two certifications contained in the Certificate in the case of Pauga v Samoa [2022] F(...TRUNCATED)
"In the case of Pauga v Samoa [2022] FCA 1097, the Certificate contained two certifications. The fir(...TRUNCATED)
"7 The Certificate contains two certifications. First, a certification that the documents attached t(...TRUNCATED)
"The two certifications contained in the Certificate in the case of Pauga v Samoa [2022] FCA 1097 we(...TRUNCATED)
"Based on the given snippet and answer, what question would you generate?\n\nPlease select the most (...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What certifications are contained in the Certificate in the case of Pauga v Samoa [20(...TRUNCATED)
"What is the purpose of the certification on the Certificate in relation to the documents attached t(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nThe Certificate in Pauga v Samoa [2022] FCA 1097 contains two certifications. The First (...TRUNCATED)
"The purpose of the certification on the Certificate in relation to the documents attached to the ce(...TRUNCATED)
Please select the most appropriate answer from the options given above.
"[[-0.07983172684907913, 0.08828240633010864, -0.039624329656362534, 0.010801390744745731, 0.1059562(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.01783875934779644, 0.1476828157901764, -0.0011109636398032308, -0.262604296207428, 0.274291306(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.05386558920145035, 0.18499450385570526, -0.025180522352457047, -0.14034762978553772, 0.1490638(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.03359609469771385, 0.1777743697166443, -0.012064019218087196, -0.22350484132766724, 0.13830994(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.0027258421760052443, 0.13586987555027008, 0.01912335306406021, -0.07275882363319397, 0.2196722(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.09192892909049988, 0.08308981359004974, -0.013772123493254185, 0.08536810427904129, 0.12760521(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.016226695850491524, 0.1297474056482315, 0.00322076678276062, -0.15252427756786346, 0.181490197(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.009077548049390316, 0.17503897845745087, -0.0019598626531660557, -0.10229574143886566, -0.0579(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.03268185257911682, 0.21056506037712097, 0.06857191026210785, -0.24489770829677582, 0.050270583(...TRUNCATED)
"[[-0.03368709981441498, -0.025241263210773468, 0.06496678292751312, 0.09407897293567657, -0.3680351(...TRUNCATED)
0.967291
0.993028
0.976264
0.978861
0.912217
1
0.020124
0.004469
0.01559
0.013394
0.966454
0.9901
0.972658
0.011239
0.006052
0.017442
2.333638
1.242462
0.723649
0.972506
1
0
README.md exists but content is empty.
Downloads last month
34