input
stringlengths 833
15.3k
| output
stringlengths 2
16
| instruction
stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|
notes to consolidated financial statements guarantees of subsidiaries . group inc . fully and unconditionally guarantees the securities issued by gs finance corp. , a wholly-owned finance subsidiary of the group inc . has guaranteed the payment obligations of goldman , sachs & co . ( gs&co. ) , gs bank usa and goldman sachs execution & clearing , l.p . ( gsec ) , subject to certain exceptions . in november 2008 , the firm contributed subsidiaries into gs bank usa , and group inc . agreed to guarantee the reimbursement of certain losses , including credit-related losses , relating to assets held by the contributed entities . in connection with this guarantee , group inc . also agreed to pledge to gs bank usa certain collateral , including interests in subsidiaries and other illiquid assets . in addition , group inc . guarantees many of the obligations of its other consolidated subsidiaries on a transaction-by- transaction basis , as negotiated with counterparties . group inc . is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under its subsidiary guarantees ; however , because these guaranteed obligations are also obligations of consolidated subsidiaries , group inc . 2019s liabilities as guarantor are not separately disclosed . note 19 . shareholders 2019 equity common equity dividends declared per common share were $ 2.25 in 2014 , $ 2.05 in 2013 and $ 1.77 in 2012 . on january 15 , 2015 , group inc . declared a dividend of $ 0.60 per common share to be paid on march 30 , 2015 to common shareholders of record on march 2 , 2015 . the firm 2019s share repurchase program is intended to help maintain the appropriate level of common equity . the share repurchase program is effected primarily through regular open-market purchases ( which may include repurchase plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 ) , the amounts and timing of which are determined primarily by the firm 2019s current and projected capital position , but which may also be influenced by general market conditions and the prevailing price and trading volumes of the firm 2019s common stock . prior to repurchasing common stock , the firm must receive confirmation that the federal reserve board does not object to such capital actions . the table below presents the amount of common stock repurchased by the firm under the share repurchase program during 2014 , 2013 and 2012. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions except per share amounts</td><td>year ended december 2014</td><td>year ended december 2013</td><td>year ended december 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common share repurchases</td><td>31.8</td><td>39.3</td><td>42.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average cost per share</td><td>$ 171.79</td><td>$ 157.11</td><td>$ 110.31</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total cost of common share repurchases</td><td>$ 5469</td><td>$ 6175</td><td>$ 4637</td></tr></table> total cost of common share repurchases $ 5469 $ 6175 $ 4637 pursuant to the terms of certain share-based compensation plans , employees may remit shares to the firm or the firm may cancel restricted stock units ( rsus ) or stock options to satisfy minimum statutory employee tax withholding requirements and the exercise price of stock options . under these plans , during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , employees remitted 174489 shares , 161211 shares and 33477 shares with a total value of $ 31 million , $ 25 million and $ 3 million , and the firm cancelled 5.8 million , 4.0 million and 12.7 million of rsus with a total value of $ 974 million , $ 599 million and $ 1.44 billion . under these plans , the firm also cancelled 15.6 million stock options with a total value of $ 2.65 billion during 2014 . 170 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .
Question: what is the total cost of common share repurchases in 2014?
Answer: 5469.0
Question: what about in 2013?
| 6175.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to consolidated financial statements guarantees of subsidiaries . group inc . fully and unconditionally guarantees the securities issued by gs finance corp. , a wholly-owned finance subsidiary of the group inc . has guaranteed the payment obligations of goldman , sachs & co . ( gs&co. ) , gs bank usa and goldman sachs execution & clearing , l.p . ( gsec ) , subject to certain exceptions . in november 2008 , the firm contributed subsidiaries into gs bank usa , and group inc . agreed to guarantee the reimbursement of certain losses , including credit-related losses , relating to assets held by the contributed entities . in connection with this guarantee , group inc . also agreed to pledge to gs bank usa certain collateral , including interests in subsidiaries and other illiquid assets . in addition , group inc . guarantees many of the obligations of its other consolidated subsidiaries on a transaction-by- transaction basis , as negotiated with counterparties . group inc . is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under its subsidiary guarantees ; however , because these guaranteed obligations are also obligations of consolidated subsidiaries , group inc . 2019s liabilities as guarantor are not separately disclosed . note 19 . shareholders 2019 equity common equity dividends declared per common share were $ 2.25 in 2014 , $ 2.05 in 2013 and $ 1.77 in 2012 . on january 15 , 2015 , group inc . declared a dividend of $ 0.60 per common share to be paid on march 30 , 2015 to common shareholders of record on march 2 , 2015 . the firm 2019s share repurchase program is intended to help maintain the appropriate level of common equity . the share repurchase program is effected primarily through regular open-market purchases ( which may include repurchase plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 ) , the amounts and timing of which are determined primarily by the firm 2019s current and projected capital position , but which may also be influenced by general market conditions and the prevailing price and trading volumes of the firm 2019s common stock . prior to repurchasing common stock , the firm must receive confirmation that the federal reserve board does not object to such capital actions . the table below presents the amount of common stock repurchased by the firm under the share repurchase program during 2014 , 2013 and 2012. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions except per share amounts</td><td>year ended december 2014</td><td>year ended december 2013</td><td>year ended december 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common share repurchases</td><td>31.8</td><td>39.3</td><td>42.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average cost per share</td><td>$ 171.79</td><td>$ 157.11</td><td>$ 110.31</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total cost of common share repurchases</td><td>$ 5469</td><td>$ 6175</td><td>$ 4637</td></tr></table> total cost of common share repurchases $ 5469 $ 6175 $ 4637 pursuant to the terms of certain share-based compensation plans , employees may remit shares to the firm or the firm may cancel restricted stock units ( rsus ) or stock options to satisfy minimum statutory employee tax withholding requirements and the exercise price of stock options . under these plans , during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , employees remitted 174489 shares , 161211 shares and 33477 shares with a total value of $ 31 million , $ 25 million and $ 3 million , and the firm cancelled 5.8 million , 4.0 million and 12.7 million of rsus with a total value of $ 974 million , $ 599 million and $ 1.44 billion . under these plans , the firm also cancelled 15.6 million stock options with a total value of $ 2.65 billion during 2014 . 170 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .
Question: what is the total cost of common share repurchases in 2014?
Answer: 5469.0
Question: what about in 2013?
Answer: 6175.0
Question: what is the net change among these years?
| -706.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to consolidated financial statements guarantees of subsidiaries . group inc . fully and unconditionally guarantees the securities issued by gs finance corp. , a wholly-owned finance subsidiary of the group inc . has guaranteed the payment obligations of goldman , sachs & co . ( gs&co. ) , gs bank usa and goldman sachs execution & clearing , l.p . ( gsec ) , subject to certain exceptions . in november 2008 , the firm contributed subsidiaries into gs bank usa , and group inc . agreed to guarantee the reimbursement of certain losses , including credit-related losses , relating to assets held by the contributed entities . in connection with this guarantee , group inc . also agreed to pledge to gs bank usa certain collateral , including interests in subsidiaries and other illiquid assets . in addition , group inc . guarantees many of the obligations of its other consolidated subsidiaries on a transaction-by- transaction basis , as negotiated with counterparties . group inc . is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under its subsidiary guarantees ; however , because these guaranteed obligations are also obligations of consolidated subsidiaries , group inc . 2019s liabilities as guarantor are not separately disclosed . note 19 . shareholders 2019 equity common equity dividends declared per common share were $ 2.25 in 2014 , $ 2.05 in 2013 and $ 1.77 in 2012 . on january 15 , 2015 , group inc . declared a dividend of $ 0.60 per common share to be paid on march 30 , 2015 to common shareholders of record on march 2 , 2015 . the firm 2019s share repurchase program is intended to help maintain the appropriate level of common equity . the share repurchase program is effected primarily through regular open-market purchases ( which may include repurchase plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 ) , the amounts and timing of which are determined primarily by the firm 2019s current and projected capital position , but which may also be influenced by general market conditions and the prevailing price and trading volumes of the firm 2019s common stock . prior to repurchasing common stock , the firm must receive confirmation that the federal reserve board does not object to such capital actions . the table below presents the amount of common stock repurchased by the firm under the share repurchase program during 2014 , 2013 and 2012. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions except per share amounts</td><td>year ended december 2014</td><td>year ended december 2013</td><td>year ended december 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common share repurchases</td><td>31.8</td><td>39.3</td><td>42.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average cost per share</td><td>$ 171.79</td><td>$ 157.11</td><td>$ 110.31</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total cost of common share repurchases</td><td>$ 5469</td><td>$ 6175</td><td>$ 4637</td></tr></table> total cost of common share repurchases $ 5469 $ 6175 $ 4637 pursuant to the terms of certain share-based compensation plans , employees may remit shares to the firm or the firm may cancel restricted stock units ( rsus ) or stock options to satisfy minimum statutory employee tax withholding requirements and the exercise price of stock options . under these plans , during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , employees remitted 174489 shares , 161211 shares and 33477 shares with a total value of $ 31 million , $ 25 million and $ 3 million , and the firm cancelled 5.8 million , 4.0 million and 12.7 million of rsus with a total value of $ 974 million , $ 599 million and $ 1.44 billion . under these plans , the firm also cancelled 15.6 million stock options with a total value of $ 2.65 billion during 2014 . 170 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .
Question: what is the total cost of common share repurchases in 2014?
Answer: 5469.0
Question: what about in 2013?
Answer: 6175.0
Question: what is the net change among these years?
Answer: -706.0
Question: what is the total cost of common share repurchases in 2013?
| 6175.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to consolidated financial statements guarantees of subsidiaries . group inc . fully and unconditionally guarantees the securities issued by gs finance corp. , a wholly-owned finance subsidiary of the group inc . has guaranteed the payment obligations of goldman , sachs & co . ( gs&co. ) , gs bank usa and goldman sachs execution & clearing , l.p . ( gsec ) , subject to certain exceptions . in november 2008 , the firm contributed subsidiaries into gs bank usa , and group inc . agreed to guarantee the reimbursement of certain losses , including credit-related losses , relating to assets held by the contributed entities . in connection with this guarantee , group inc . also agreed to pledge to gs bank usa certain collateral , including interests in subsidiaries and other illiquid assets . in addition , group inc . guarantees many of the obligations of its other consolidated subsidiaries on a transaction-by- transaction basis , as negotiated with counterparties . group inc . is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under its subsidiary guarantees ; however , because these guaranteed obligations are also obligations of consolidated subsidiaries , group inc . 2019s liabilities as guarantor are not separately disclosed . note 19 . shareholders 2019 equity common equity dividends declared per common share were $ 2.25 in 2014 , $ 2.05 in 2013 and $ 1.77 in 2012 . on january 15 , 2015 , group inc . declared a dividend of $ 0.60 per common share to be paid on march 30 , 2015 to common shareholders of record on march 2 , 2015 . the firm 2019s share repurchase program is intended to help maintain the appropriate level of common equity . the share repurchase program is effected primarily through regular open-market purchases ( which may include repurchase plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 ) , the amounts and timing of which are determined primarily by the firm 2019s current and projected capital position , but which may also be influenced by general market conditions and the prevailing price and trading volumes of the firm 2019s common stock . prior to repurchasing common stock , the firm must receive confirmation that the federal reserve board does not object to such capital actions . the table below presents the amount of common stock repurchased by the firm under the share repurchase program during 2014 , 2013 and 2012. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions except per share amounts</td><td>year ended december 2014</td><td>year ended december 2013</td><td>year ended december 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common share repurchases</td><td>31.8</td><td>39.3</td><td>42.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average cost per share</td><td>$ 171.79</td><td>$ 157.11</td><td>$ 110.31</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total cost of common share repurchases</td><td>$ 5469</td><td>$ 6175</td><td>$ 4637</td></tr></table> total cost of common share repurchases $ 5469 $ 6175 $ 4637 pursuant to the terms of certain share-based compensation plans , employees may remit shares to the firm or the firm may cancel restricted stock units ( rsus ) or stock options to satisfy minimum statutory employee tax withholding requirements and the exercise price of stock options . under these plans , during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , employees remitted 174489 shares , 161211 shares and 33477 shares with a total value of $ 31 million , $ 25 million and $ 3 million , and the firm cancelled 5.8 million , 4.0 million and 12.7 million of rsus with a total value of $ 974 million , $ 599 million and $ 1.44 billion . under these plans , the firm also cancelled 15.6 million stock options with a total value of $ 2.65 billion during 2014 . 170 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .
Question: what is the total cost of common share repurchases in 2014?
Answer: 5469.0
Question: what about in 2013?
Answer: 6175.0
Question: what is the net change among these years?
Answer: -706.0
Question: what is the total cost of common share repurchases in 2013?
Answer: 6175.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| -0.11433 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters recent sales of unregistered securities during the fourth quarter of 2003 , aes issued an aggregated of 20.2 million shares of its common stock in exchange for $ 20 million aggregate principal amount of its senior notes . the shares were issued without registration in reliance upon section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) under the securities act of 1933 . market information our common stock is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( 2018 2018nyse 2019 2019 ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for our common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2003 first quarter</td><td>high $ 4.04</td><td>low $ 2.72</td><td>2002 first quarter</td><td>high $ 17.84</td><td>low $ 4.11</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second quarter</td><td>8.37</td><td>3.75</td><td>second quarter</td><td>9.17</td><td>3.55</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>third quarter</td><td>7.70</td><td>5.91</td><td>third quarter</td><td>4.61</td><td>1.56</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>9.50</td><td>7.57</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>3.57</td><td>0.95</td></tr></table> holders as of march 3 , 2004 , there were 9026 record holders of our common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends under the terms of our senior secured credit facilities , which we entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , we are not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , under the terms of a guaranty we provided to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project , we are precluded from paying cash dividends on our common stock if we do not meet certain net worth and liquidity tests . our project subsidiaries 2019 ability to declare and pay cash dividends to us is subject to certain limitations contained in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements that our project subsidiaries are subject to . see item 12 ( d ) of this form 10-k for information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans. .
Question: combined, what was the high and low price for 2003 q1?
| 6.76 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters recent sales of unregistered securities during the fourth quarter of 2003 , aes issued an aggregated of 20.2 million shares of its common stock in exchange for $ 20 million aggregate principal amount of its senior notes . the shares were issued without registration in reliance upon section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) under the securities act of 1933 . market information our common stock is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( 2018 2018nyse 2019 2019 ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for our common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2003 first quarter</td><td>high $ 4.04</td><td>low $ 2.72</td><td>2002 first quarter</td><td>high $ 17.84</td><td>low $ 4.11</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second quarter</td><td>8.37</td><td>3.75</td><td>second quarter</td><td>9.17</td><td>3.55</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>third quarter</td><td>7.70</td><td>5.91</td><td>third quarter</td><td>4.61</td><td>1.56</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>9.50</td><td>7.57</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>3.57</td><td>0.95</td></tr></table> holders as of march 3 , 2004 , there were 9026 record holders of our common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends under the terms of our senior secured credit facilities , which we entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , we are not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , under the terms of a guaranty we provided to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project , we are precluded from paying cash dividends on our common stock if we do not meet certain net worth and liquidity tests . our project subsidiaries 2019 ability to declare and pay cash dividends to us is subject to certain limitations contained in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements that our project subsidiaries are subject to . see item 12 ( d ) of this form 10-k for information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans. .
Question: combined, what was the high and low price for 2003 q1?
Answer: 6.76
Question: and the average of these values?
| 3.38 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds . ( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) . ( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service . the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 . entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term debt . ( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 lease obligation and entergy louisiana 2019s acquisition of the equity participant 2019s beneficial interest in the waterford 3 leased assets and for further discussion of the grand gulf lease obligation . ( e ) this note does not have a stated interest rate , but has an implicit interest rate of 7.458% ( 7.458 % ) . ( f ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 57 million at entergy louisiana and $ 34 million at system energy , and long-term doe obligations of $ 182 million at entergy arkansas , and includes debt due within one year . fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 15 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades . the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2016 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 307403</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 828084</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 724899</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>$ 795000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>$ 1674548</td></tr></table> in november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction . as part of the purchase agreement with nypa , entergy recorded a liability representing the net present value of the payments entergy would be liable to nypa for each year that the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants would run beyond their respective original nrc license expiration date . in october 2015 , entergy announced a planned shutdown of fitzpatrick at the end of its fuel cycle . as a result of the announcement , entergy reduced this liability by $ 26.4 million pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement . in august 2016 , entergy entered into a trust transfer agreement with nypa to transfer the decommissioning trust funds and decommissioning liabilities for the indian point 3 and fitzpatrick plants to entergy . as part of the trust transfer agreement , the original decommissioning agreements were amended , and the entergy subsidiaries 2019 obligation to make additional license extension payments to nypa was eliminated . in the third quarter 2016 , entergy removed the note payable of $ 35.1 million from the consolidated balance sheet . entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2017 . entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2018 . entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through june 2018 . capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .
Question: what is the sum of long term debt due in 2017 and 2018?
| 1135487.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ( a ) consists of pollution control revenue bonds and environmental revenue bonds , some of which are secured by collateral first mortgage bonds . ( b ) these notes do not have a stated interest rate , but have an implicit interest rate of 4.8% ( 4.8 % ) . ( c ) pursuant to the nuclear waste policy act of 1982 , entergy 2019s nuclear owner/licensee subsidiaries have contracts with the doe for spent nuclear fuel disposal service . the contracts include a one-time fee for generation prior to april 7 , 1983 . entergy arkansas is the only entergy company that generated electric power with nuclear fuel prior to that date and includes the one-time fee , plus accrued interest , in long-term debt . ( d ) see note 10 to the financial statements for further discussion of the waterford 3 lease obligation and entergy louisiana 2019s acquisition of the equity participant 2019s beneficial interest in the waterford 3 leased assets and for further discussion of the grand gulf lease obligation . ( e ) this note does not have a stated interest rate , but has an implicit interest rate of 7.458% ( 7.458 % ) . ( f ) the fair value excludes lease obligations of $ 57 million at entergy louisiana and $ 34 million at system energy , and long-term doe obligations of $ 182 million at entergy arkansas , and includes debt due within one year . fair values are classified as level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in note 15 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades . the annual long-term debt maturities ( excluding lease obligations and long-term doe obligations ) for debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2016 , for the next five years are as follows : amount ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 307403</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>$ 828084</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>$ 724899</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>$ 795000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>$ 1674548</td></tr></table> in november 2000 , entergy 2019s non-utility nuclear business purchased the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants in a seller-financed transaction . as part of the purchase agreement with nypa , entergy recorded a liability representing the net present value of the payments entergy would be liable to nypa for each year that the fitzpatrick and indian point 3 power plants would run beyond their respective original nrc license expiration date . in october 2015 , entergy announced a planned shutdown of fitzpatrick at the end of its fuel cycle . as a result of the announcement , entergy reduced this liability by $ 26.4 million pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement . in august 2016 , entergy entered into a trust transfer agreement with nypa to transfer the decommissioning trust funds and decommissioning liabilities for the indian point 3 and fitzpatrick plants to entergy . as part of the trust transfer agreement , the original decommissioning agreements were amended , and the entergy subsidiaries 2019 obligation to make additional license extension payments to nypa was eliminated . in the third quarter 2016 , entergy removed the note payable of $ 35.1 million from the consolidated balance sheet . entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy texas , and system energy have obtained long-term financing authorizations from the ferc that extend through october 2017 . entergy arkansas has obtained long-term financing authorization from the apsc that extends through december 2018 . entergy new orleans has obtained long-term financing authorization from the city council that extends through june 2018 . capital funds agreement pursuant to an agreement with certain creditors , entergy corporation has agreed to supply system energy with sufficient capital to : 2022 maintain system energy 2019s equity capital at a minimum of 35% ( 35 % ) of its total capitalization ( excluding short- term debt ) ; .
Question: what is the sum of long term debt due in 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 1135487.0
Question: what is that divided by 1000?
| 1135.487 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 30 , dec 31 , dec 26 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended ( in millions )</td><td>dec 302017</td><td>dec 312016</td><td>dec 262015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 22110</td><td>$ 21808</td><td>$ 19018</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-15762 ( 15762 )</td><td>-25817 ( 25817 )</td><td>-8183 ( 8183 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>-8475 ( 8475 )</td><td>-5739 ( 5739 )</td><td>1912</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2127 ( 2127 )</td><td>$ -9748 ( 9748 )</td><td>$ 12747</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities . for 2017 compared to 2016 , the $ 302 million increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes to working capital partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items and lower net income . tax reform did not have an impact on our 2017 cash provided by operating activities . the increase in cash provided by operating activities was driven by increased income before taxes and $ 1.0 billion receipts of customer deposits . these increases were partially offset by increased inventory and accounts receivable . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2017 compared to 2016 were $ 2.9 billion higher due to higher income before taxes , taxable gains on sales of asml , and taxes on the isecg divestiture . we expect approximately $ 2.0 billion of additional customer deposits in 2018 . for 2016 compared to 2015 , the $ 2.8 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to adjustments for non-cash items and changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income . the adjustments for non-cash items were higher in 2016 primarily due to restructuring and other charges and the change in deferred taxes , partially offset by lower depreciation . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; and proceeds from divestitures and cash used for acquisitions . our capital expenditures were $ 11.8 billion in 2017 ( $ 9.6 billion in 2016 and $ 7.3 billion in 2015 ) . the decrease in cash used for investing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to higher net activity of available-for sale-investments in 2017 , proceeds from our divestiture of isecg in 2017 , and higher maturities and sales of trading assets in 2017 . this activity was partially offset by higher capital expenditures in 2017 . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to our completed acquisition of altera , net purchases of trading assets in 2016 compared to net sales of trading assets in 2015 , and higher capital expenditures in 2016 . this increase was partially offset by lower investments in non-marketable equity investments . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of short-term and long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock through employee equity incentive plans . the increase in cash used for financing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to net long-term debt activity , which was a use of cash in 2017 compared to a source of cash in 2016 . during 2017 , we repurchased $ 3.6 billion of common stock under our authorized common stock repurchase program , compared to $ 2.6 billion in 2016 . as of december 30 , 2017 , $ 13.2 billion remained available for repurchasing common stock under the existing repurchase authorization limit . we base our level of common stock repurchases on internal cash management decisions , and this level may fluctuate . proceeds from the sale of common stock through employee equity incentive plans totaled $ 770 million in 2017 compared to $ 1.1 billion in 2016 . our total dividend payments were $ 5.1 billion in 2017 compared to $ 4.9 billion in 2016 . we have paid a cash dividend in each of the past 101 quarters . in january 2018 , our board of directors approved an increase to our cash dividend to $ 1.20 per share on an annual basis . the board has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.30 per share of common stock for q1 2018 . the dividend is payable on march 1 , 2018 to stockholders of record on february 7 , 2018 . cash was used for financing activities in 2016 compared to cash provided by financing activities in 2015 , primarily due to fewer debt issuances and the repayment of debt in 2016 . this activity was partially offset by repayment of commercial paper in 2015 and fewer common stock repurchases in 2016 . md&a - results of operations consolidated results and analysis 37 .
Question: what was the value of cash provided by operating activities in 2017?
| 22110.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 30 , dec 31 , dec 26 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended ( in millions )</td><td>dec 302017</td><td>dec 312016</td><td>dec 262015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 22110</td><td>$ 21808</td><td>$ 19018</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-15762 ( 15762 )</td><td>-25817 ( 25817 )</td><td>-8183 ( 8183 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>-8475 ( 8475 )</td><td>-5739 ( 5739 )</td><td>1912</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2127 ( 2127 )</td><td>$ -9748 ( 9748 )</td><td>$ 12747</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities . for 2017 compared to 2016 , the $ 302 million increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes to working capital partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items and lower net income . tax reform did not have an impact on our 2017 cash provided by operating activities . the increase in cash provided by operating activities was driven by increased income before taxes and $ 1.0 billion receipts of customer deposits . these increases were partially offset by increased inventory and accounts receivable . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2017 compared to 2016 were $ 2.9 billion higher due to higher income before taxes , taxable gains on sales of asml , and taxes on the isecg divestiture . we expect approximately $ 2.0 billion of additional customer deposits in 2018 . for 2016 compared to 2015 , the $ 2.8 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to adjustments for non-cash items and changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income . the adjustments for non-cash items were higher in 2016 primarily due to restructuring and other charges and the change in deferred taxes , partially offset by lower depreciation . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; and proceeds from divestitures and cash used for acquisitions . our capital expenditures were $ 11.8 billion in 2017 ( $ 9.6 billion in 2016 and $ 7.3 billion in 2015 ) . the decrease in cash used for investing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to higher net activity of available-for sale-investments in 2017 , proceeds from our divestiture of isecg in 2017 , and higher maturities and sales of trading assets in 2017 . this activity was partially offset by higher capital expenditures in 2017 . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to our completed acquisition of altera , net purchases of trading assets in 2016 compared to net sales of trading assets in 2015 , and higher capital expenditures in 2016 . this increase was partially offset by lower investments in non-marketable equity investments . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of short-term and long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock through employee equity incentive plans . the increase in cash used for financing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to net long-term debt activity , which was a use of cash in 2017 compared to a source of cash in 2016 . during 2017 , we repurchased $ 3.6 billion of common stock under our authorized common stock repurchase program , compared to $ 2.6 billion in 2016 . as of december 30 , 2017 , $ 13.2 billion remained available for repurchasing common stock under the existing repurchase authorization limit . we base our level of common stock repurchases on internal cash management decisions , and this level may fluctuate . proceeds from the sale of common stock through employee equity incentive plans totaled $ 770 million in 2017 compared to $ 1.1 billion in 2016 . our total dividend payments were $ 5.1 billion in 2017 compared to $ 4.9 billion in 2016 . we have paid a cash dividend in each of the past 101 quarters . in january 2018 , our board of directors approved an increase to our cash dividend to $ 1.20 per share on an annual basis . the board has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.30 per share of common stock for q1 2018 . the dividend is payable on march 1 , 2018 to stockholders of record on february 7 , 2018 . cash was used for financing activities in 2016 compared to cash provided by financing activities in 2015 , primarily due to fewer debt issuances and the repayment of debt in 2016 . this activity was partially offset by repayment of commercial paper in 2015 and fewer common stock repurchases in 2016 . md&a - results of operations consolidated results and analysis 37 .
Question: what was the value of cash provided by operating activities in 2017?
Answer: 22110.0
Question: what was the value in 2016?
| 21808.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 30 , dec 31 , dec 26 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended ( in millions )</td><td>dec 302017</td><td>dec 312016</td><td>dec 262015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 22110</td><td>$ 21808</td><td>$ 19018</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-15762 ( 15762 )</td><td>-25817 ( 25817 )</td><td>-8183 ( 8183 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>-8475 ( 8475 )</td><td>-5739 ( 5739 )</td><td>1912</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2127 ( 2127 )</td><td>$ -9748 ( 9748 )</td><td>$ 12747</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities . for 2017 compared to 2016 , the $ 302 million increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes to working capital partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items and lower net income . tax reform did not have an impact on our 2017 cash provided by operating activities . the increase in cash provided by operating activities was driven by increased income before taxes and $ 1.0 billion receipts of customer deposits . these increases were partially offset by increased inventory and accounts receivable . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2017 compared to 2016 were $ 2.9 billion higher due to higher income before taxes , taxable gains on sales of asml , and taxes on the isecg divestiture . we expect approximately $ 2.0 billion of additional customer deposits in 2018 . for 2016 compared to 2015 , the $ 2.8 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to adjustments for non-cash items and changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income . the adjustments for non-cash items were higher in 2016 primarily due to restructuring and other charges and the change in deferred taxes , partially offset by lower depreciation . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; and proceeds from divestitures and cash used for acquisitions . our capital expenditures were $ 11.8 billion in 2017 ( $ 9.6 billion in 2016 and $ 7.3 billion in 2015 ) . the decrease in cash used for investing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to higher net activity of available-for sale-investments in 2017 , proceeds from our divestiture of isecg in 2017 , and higher maturities and sales of trading assets in 2017 . this activity was partially offset by higher capital expenditures in 2017 . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to our completed acquisition of altera , net purchases of trading assets in 2016 compared to net sales of trading assets in 2015 , and higher capital expenditures in 2016 . this increase was partially offset by lower investments in non-marketable equity investments . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of short-term and long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock through employee equity incentive plans . the increase in cash used for financing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to net long-term debt activity , which was a use of cash in 2017 compared to a source of cash in 2016 . during 2017 , we repurchased $ 3.6 billion of common stock under our authorized common stock repurchase program , compared to $ 2.6 billion in 2016 . as of december 30 , 2017 , $ 13.2 billion remained available for repurchasing common stock under the existing repurchase authorization limit . we base our level of common stock repurchases on internal cash management decisions , and this level may fluctuate . proceeds from the sale of common stock through employee equity incentive plans totaled $ 770 million in 2017 compared to $ 1.1 billion in 2016 . our total dividend payments were $ 5.1 billion in 2017 compared to $ 4.9 billion in 2016 . we have paid a cash dividend in each of the past 101 quarters . in january 2018 , our board of directors approved an increase to our cash dividend to $ 1.20 per share on an annual basis . the board has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.30 per share of common stock for q1 2018 . the dividend is payable on march 1 , 2018 to stockholders of record on february 7 , 2018 . cash was used for financing activities in 2016 compared to cash provided by financing activities in 2015 , primarily due to fewer debt issuances and the repayment of debt in 2016 . this activity was partially offset by repayment of commercial paper in 2015 and fewer common stock repurchases in 2016 . md&a - results of operations consolidated results and analysis 37 .
Question: what was the value of cash provided by operating activities in 2017?
Answer: 22110.0
Question: what was the value in 2016?
Answer: 21808.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
| 302.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 30 , dec 31 , dec 26 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended ( in millions )</td><td>dec 302017</td><td>dec 312016</td><td>dec 262015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 22110</td><td>$ 21808</td><td>$ 19018</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-15762 ( 15762 )</td><td>-25817 ( 25817 )</td><td>-8183 ( 8183 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>-8475 ( 8475 )</td><td>-5739 ( 5739 )</td><td>1912</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2127 ( 2127 )</td><td>$ -9748 ( 9748 )</td><td>$ 12747</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities . for 2017 compared to 2016 , the $ 302 million increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes to working capital partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items and lower net income . tax reform did not have an impact on our 2017 cash provided by operating activities . the increase in cash provided by operating activities was driven by increased income before taxes and $ 1.0 billion receipts of customer deposits . these increases were partially offset by increased inventory and accounts receivable . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2017 compared to 2016 were $ 2.9 billion higher due to higher income before taxes , taxable gains on sales of asml , and taxes on the isecg divestiture . we expect approximately $ 2.0 billion of additional customer deposits in 2018 . for 2016 compared to 2015 , the $ 2.8 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to adjustments for non-cash items and changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income . the adjustments for non-cash items were higher in 2016 primarily due to restructuring and other charges and the change in deferred taxes , partially offset by lower depreciation . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; and proceeds from divestitures and cash used for acquisitions . our capital expenditures were $ 11.8 billion in 2017 ( $ 9.6 billion in 2016 and $ 7.3 billion in 2015 ) . the decrease in cash used for investing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to higher net activity of available-for sale-investments in 2017 , proceeds from our divestiture of isecg in 2017 , and higher maturities and sales of trading assets in 2017 . this activity was partially offset by higher capital expenditures in 2017 . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to our completed acquisition of altera , net purchases of trading assets in 2016 compared to net sales of trading assets in 2015 , and higher capital expenditures in 2016 . this increase was partially offset by lower investments in non-marketable equity investments . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of short-term and long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock through employee equity incentive plans . the increase in cash used for financing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to net long-term debt activity , which was a use of cash in 2017 compared to a source of cash in 2016 . during 2017 , we repurchased $ 3.6 billion of common stock under our authorized common stock repurchase program , compared to $ 2.6 billion in 2016 . as of december 30 , 2017 , $ 13.2 billion remained available for repurchasing common stock under the existing repurchase authorization limit . we base our level of common stock repurchases on internal cash management decisions , and this level may fluctuate . proceeds from the sale of common stock through employee equity incentive plans totaled $ 770 million in 2017 compared to $ 1.1 billion in 2016 . our total dividend payments were $ 5.1 billion in 2017 compared to $ 4.9 billion in 2016 . we have paid a cash dividend in each of the past 101 quarters . in january 2018 , our board of directors approved an increase to our cash dividend to $ 1.20 per share on an annual basis . the board has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.30 per share of common stock for q1 2018 . the dividend is payable on march 1 , 2018 to stockholders of record on february 7 , 2018 . cash was used for financing activities in 2016 compared to cash provided by financing activities in 2015 , primarily due to fewer debt issuances and the repayment of debt in 2016 . this activity was partially offset by repayment of commercial paper in 2015 and fewer common stock repurchases in 2016 . md&a - results of operations consolidated results and analysis 37 .
Question: what was the value of cash provided by operating activities in 2017?
Answer: 22110.0
Question: what was the value in 2016?
Answer: 21808.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
Answer: 302.0
Question: what was the 2016 value?
| 21808.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 30 , dec 31 , dec 26 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended ( in millions )</td><td>dec 302017</td><td>dec 312016</td><td>dec 262015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 22110</td><td>$ 21808</td><td>$ 19018</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used for investing activities</td><td>-15762 ( 15762 )</td><td>-25817 ( 25817 )</td><td>-8183 ( 8183 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities</td><td>-8475 ( 8475 )</td><td>-5739 ( 5739 )</td><td>1912</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ -2127 ( 2127 )</td><td>$ -9748 ( 9748 )</td><td>$ 12747</td></tr></table> operating activities cash provided by operating activities is net income adjusted for certain non-cash items and changes in assets and liabilities . for 2017 compared to 2016 , the $ 302 million increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to changes to working capital partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items and lower net income . tax reform did not have an impact on our 2017 cash provided by operating activities . the increase in cash provided by operating activities was driven by increased income before taxes and $ 1.0 billion receipts of customer deposits . these increases were partially offset by increased inventory and accounts receivable . income taxes paid , net of refunds , in 2017 compared to 2016 were $ 2.9 billion higher due to higher income before taxes , taxable gains on sales of asml , and taxes on the isecg divestiture . we expect approximately $ 2.0 billion of additional customer deposits in 2018 . for 2016 compared to 2015 , the $ 2.8 billion increase in cash provided by operating activities was due to adjustments for non-cash items and changes in working capital , partially offset by lower net income . the adjustments for non-cash items were higher in 2016 primarily due to restructuring and other charges and the change in deferred taxes , partially offset by lower depreciation . investing activities investing cash flows consist primarily of capital expenditures ; investment purchases , sales , maturities , and disposals ; and proceeds from divestitures and cash used for acquisitions . our capital expenditures were $ 11.8 billion in 2017 ( $ 9.6 billion in 2016 and $ 7.3 billion in 2015 ) . the decrease in cash used for investing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to higher net activity of available-for sale-investments in 2017 , proceeds from our divestiture of isecg in 2017 , and higher maturities and sales of trading assets in 2017 . this activity was partially offset by higher capital expenditures in 2017 . the increase in cash used for investing activities in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to our completed acquisition of altera , net purchases of trading assets in 2016 compared to net sales of trading assets in 2015 , and higher capital expenditures in 2016 . this increase was partially offset by lower investments in non-marketable equity investments . financing activities financing cash flows consist primarily of repurchases of common stock , payment of dividends to stockholders , issuance and repayment of short-term and long-term debt , and proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock through employee equity incentive plans . the increase in cash used for financing activities in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to net long-term debt activity , which was a use of cash in 2017 compared to a source of cash in 2016 . during 2017 , we repurchased $ 3.6 billion of common stock under our authorized common stock repurchase program , compared to $ 2.6 billion in 2016 . as of december 30 , 2017 , $ 13.2 billion remained available for repurchasing common stock under the existing repurchase authorization limit . we base our level of common stock repurchases on internal cash management decisions , and this level may fluctuate . proceeds from the sale of common stock through employee equity incentive plans totaled $ 770 million in 2017 compared to $ 1.1 billion in 2016 . our total dividend payments were $ 5.1 billion in 2017 compared to $ 4.9 billion in 2016 . we have paid a cash dividend in each of the past 101 quarters . in january 2018 , our board of directors approved an increase to our cash dividend to $ 1.20 per share on an annual basis . the board has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.30 per share of common stock for q1 2018 . the dividend is payable on march 1 , 2018 to stockholders of record on february 7 , 2018 . cash was used for financing activities in 2016 compared to cash provided by financing activities in 2015 , primarily due to fewer debt issuances and the repayment of debt in 2016 . this activity was partially offset by repayment of commercial paper in 2015 and fewer common stock repurchases in 2016 . md&a - results of operations consolidated results and analysis 37 .
Question: what was the value of cash provided by operating activities in 2017?
Answer: 22110.0
Question: what was the value in 2016?
Answer: 21808.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
Answer: 302.0
Question: what was the 2016 value?
Answer: 21808.0
Question: what is the net change divided by the 2016 value?
| 0.01385 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
december 2016 acquisition of camber and higher volumes in fleet support and oil and gas services , partially offset by lower nuclear and environmental volumes due to the resolution in 2016 of outstanding contract changes on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract . segment operating income 2018 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , was $ 32 million , compared to operating income of $ 21 million in 2017 . the increase was primarily due to an allowance for accounts receivable in 2017 on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract and higher income from operating investments at our nuclear and environmental joint ventures , partially offset by one time employee bonus payments in 2018 related to the tax act and lower performance in fleet support services . 2017 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was $ 21 million , compared to operating income of $ 8 million in 2016 . the increase was primarily due to improved performance in oil and gas services and higher volume in mdis services following the december 2016 acquisition of camber , partially offset by the establishment of an allowance for accounts receivable on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract in 2017 and the resolution in 2016 of outstanding contract changes on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract . backlog total backlog as of december 31 , 2018 , was approximately $ 23 billion . total backlog includes both funded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is contractually obligated by the customer ) and unfunded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is not currently contractually obligated by the customer ) . backlog excludes unexercised contract options and unfunded idiq orders . for contracts having no stated contract values , backlog includes only the amounts committed by the customer . the following table presents funded and unfunded backlog by segment as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>december 31 2018 funded</td><td>december 31 2018 unfunded</td><td>december 31 2018 total backlog</td><td>december 31 2018 funded</td><td>december 31 2018 unfunded</td><td>total backlog</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ingalls</td><td>$ 9943</td><td>$ 1422</td><td>$ 11365</td><td>$ 5920</td><td>$ 2071</td><td>$ 7991</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>newport news</td><td>6767</td><td>4144</td><td>10911</td><td>6976</td><td>5608</td><td>12584</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>technical solutions</td><td>339</td><td>380</td><td>719</td><td>478</td><td>314</td><td>792</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total backlog</td><td>$ 17049</td><td>$ 5946</td><td>$ 22995</td><td>$ 13374</td><td>$ 7993</td><td>$ 21367</td></tr></table> we expect approximately 30% ( 30 % ) of the $ 23 billion total backlog as of december 31 , 2018 , to be converted into sales in 2019 . u.s . government orders comprised substantially all of the backlog as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . awards 2018 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2018 , was approximately $ 9.8 billion . significant new awards during the period included contracts for the construction of three arleigh burke class ( ddg 51 ) destroyers , for the detail design and construction of richard m . mccool jr . ( lpd 29 ) , for procurement of long-lead-time material for enterprise ( cvn 80 ) , and for the construction of nsc 10 ( unnamed ) and nsc 11 ( unnamed ) . in addition , we received awards in 2019 valued at $ 15.2 billion for detail design and construction of the gerald r . ford class ( cvn 78 ) aircraft carriers enterprise ( cvn 80 ) and cvn 81 ( unnamed ) . 2017 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was approximately $ 8.1 billion . significant new awards during this period included the detailed design and construction contract for bougainville ( lha 8 ) and the execution contract for the rcoh of uss george washington ( cvn 73 ) . .
Question: what was the operating income in 2017?
| 21.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
december 2016 acquisition of camber and higher volumes in fleet support and oil and gas services , partially offset by lower nuclear and environmental volumes due to the resolution in 2016 of outstanding contract changes on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract . segment operating income 2018 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , was $ 32 million , compared to operating income of $ 21 million in 2017 . the increase was primarily due to an allowance for accounts receivable in 2017 on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract and higher income from operating investments at our nuclear and environmental joint ventures , partially offset by one time employee bonus payments in 2018 related to the tax act and lower performance in fleet support services . 2017 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was $ 21 million , compared to operating income of $ 8 million in 2016 . the increase was primarily due to improved performance in oil and gas services and higher volume in mdis services following the december 2016 acquisition of camber , partially offset by the establishment of an allowance for accounts receivable on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract in 2017 and the resolution in 2016 of outstanding contract changes on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract . backlog total backlog as of december 31 , 2018 , was approximately $ 23 billion . total backlog includes both funded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is contractually obligated by the customer ) and unfunded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is not currently contractually obligated by the customer ) . backlog excludes unexercised contract options and unfunded idiq orders . for contracts having no stated contract values , backlog includes only the amounts committed by the customer . the following table presents funded and unfunded backlog by segment as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>december 31 2018 funded</td><td>december 31 2018 unfunded</td><td>december 31 2018 total backlog</td><td>december 31 2018 funded</td><td>december 31 2018 unfunded</td><td>total backlog</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ingalls</td><td>$ 9943</td><td>$ 1422</td><td>$ 11365</td><td>$ 5920</td><td>$ 2071</td><td>$ 7991</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>newport news</td><td>6767</td><td>4144</td><td>10911</td><td>6976</td><td>5608</td><td>12584</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>technical solutions</td><td>339</td><td>380</td><td>719</td><td>478</td><td>314</td><td>792</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total backlog</td><td>$ 17049</td><td>$ 5946</td><td>$ 22995</td><td>$ 13374</td><td>$ 7993</td><td>$ 21367</td></tr></table> we expect approximately 30% ( 30 % ) of the $ 23 billion total backlog as of december 31 , 2018 , to be converted into sales in 2019 . u.s . government orders comprised substantially all of the backlog as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . awards 2018 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2018 , was approximately $ 9.8 billion . significant new awards during the period included contracts for the construction of three arleigh burke class ( ddg 51 ) destroyers , for the detail design and construction of richard m . mccool jr . ( lpd 29 ) , for procurement of long-lead-time material for enterprise ( cvn 80 ) , and for the construction of nsc 10 ( unnamed ) and nsc 11 ( unnamed ) . in addition , we received awards in 2019 valued at $ 15.2 billion for detail design and construction of the gerald r . ford class ( cvn 78 ) aircraft carriers enterprise ( cvn 80 ) and cvn 81 ( unnamed ) . 2017 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was approximately $ 8.1 billion . significant new awards during this period included the detailed design and construction contract for bougainville ( lha 8 ) and the execution contract for the rcoh of uss george washington ( cvn 73 ) . .
Question: what was the operating income in 2017?
Answer: 21.0
Question: how much did this change from 2016?
| 13.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
december 2016 acquisition of camber and higher volumes in fleet support and oil and gas services , partially offset by lower nuclear and environmental volumes due to the resolution in 2016 of outstanding contract changes on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract . segment operating income 2018 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , was $ 32 million , compared to operating income of $ 21 million in 2017 . the increase was primarily due to an allowance for accounts receivable in 2017 on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract and higher income from operating investments at our nuclear and environmental joint ventures , partially offset by one time employee bonus payments in 2018 related to the tax act and lower performance in fleet support services . 2017 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was $ 21 million , compared to operating income of $ 8 million in 2016 . the increase was primarily due to improved performance in oil and gas services and higher volume in mdis services following the december 2016 acquisition of camber , partially offset by the establishment of an allowance for accounts receivable on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract in 2017 and the resolution in 2016 of outstanding contract changes on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract . backlog total backlog as of december 31 , 2018 , was approximately $ 23 billion . total backlog includes both funded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is contractually obligated by the customer ) and unfunded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is not currently contractually obligated by the customer ) . backlog excludes unexercised contract options and unfunded idiq orders . for contracts having no stated contract values , backlog includes only the amounts committed by the customer . the following table presents funded and unfunded backlog by segment as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>december 31 2018 funded</td><td>december 31 2018 unfunded</td><td>december 31 2018 total backlog</td><td>december 31 2018 funded</td><td>december 31 2018 unfunded</td><td>total backlog</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ingalls</td><td>$ 9943</td><td>$ 1422</td><td>$ 11365</td><td>$ 5920</td><td>$ 2071</td><td>$ 7991</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>newport news</td><td>6767</td><td>4144</td><td>10911</td><td>6976</td><td>5608</td><td>12584</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>technical solutions</td><td>339</td><td>380</td><td>719</td><td>478</td><td>314</td><td>792</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total backlog</td><td>$ 17049</td><td>$ 5946</td><td>$ 22995</td><td>$ 13374</td><td>$ 7993</td><td>$ 21367</td></tr></table> we expect approximately 30% ( 30 % ) of the $ 23 billion total backlog as of december 31 , 2018 , to be converted into sales in 2019 . u.s . government orders comprised substantially all of the backlog as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . awards 2018 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2018 , was approximately $ 9.8 billion . significant new awards during the period included contracts for the construction of three arleigh burke class ( ddg 51 ) destroyers , for the detail design and construction of richard m . mccool jr . ( lpd 29 ) , for procurement of long-lead-time material for enterprise ( cvn 80 ) , and for the construction of nsc 10 ( unnamed ) and nsc 11 ( unnamed ) . in addition , we received awards in 2019 valued at $ 15.2 billion for detail design and construction of the gerald r . ford class ( cvn 78 ) aircraft carriers enterprise ( cvn 80 ) and cvn 81 ( unnamed ) . 2017 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was approximately $ 8.1 billion . significant new awards during this period included the detailed design and construction contract for bougainville ( lha 8 ) and the execution contract for the rcoh of uss george washington ( cvn 73 ) . .
Question: what was the operating income in 2017?
Answer: 21.0
Question: how much did this change from 2016?
Answer: 13.0
Question: and the percentage increase during this time?
| 1.625 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
december 2016 acquisition of camber and higher volumes in fleet support and oil and gas services , partially offset by lower nuclear and environmental volumes due to the resolution in 2016 of outstanding contract changes on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract . segment operating income 2018 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , was $ 32 million , compared to operating income of $ 21 million in 2017 . the increase was primarily due to an allowance for accounts receivable in 2017 on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract and higher income from operating investments at our nuclear and environmental joint ventures , partially offset by one time employee bonus payments in 2018 related to the tax act and lower performance in fleet support services . 2017 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was $ 21 million , compared to operating income of $ 8 million in 2016 . the increase was primarily due to improved performance in oil and gas services and higher volume in mdis services following the december 2016 acquisition of camber , partially offset by the establishment of an allowance for accounts receivable on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract in 2017 and the resolution in 2016 of outstanding contract changes on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract . backlog total backlog as of december 31 , 2018 , was approximately $ 23 billion . total backlog includes both funded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is contractually obligated by the customer ) and unfunded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is not currently contractually obligated by the customer ) . backlog excludes unexercised contract options and unfunded idiq orders . for contracts having no stated contract values , backlog includes only the amounts committed by the customer . the following table presents funded and unfunded backlog by segment as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>december 31 2018 funded</td><td>december 31 2018 unfunded</td><td>december 31 2018 total backlog</td><td>december 31 2018 funded</td><td>december 31 2018 unfunded</td><td>total backlog</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ingalls</td><td>$ 9943</td><td>$ 1422</td><td>$ 11365</td><td>$ 5920</td><td>$ 2071</td><td>$ 7991</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>newport news</td><td>6767</td><td>4144</td><td>10911</td><td>6976</td><td>5608</td><td>12584</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>technical solutions</td><td>339</td><td>380</td><td>719</td><td>478</td><td>314</td><td>792</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total backlog</td><td>$ 17049</td><td>$ 5946</td><td>$ 22995</td><td>$ 13374</td><td>$ 7993</td><td>$ 21367</td></tr></table> we expect approximately 30% ( 30 % ) of the $ 23 billion total backlog as of december 31 , 2018 , to be converted into sales in 2019 . u.s . government orders comprised substantially all of the backlog as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . awards 2018 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2018 , was approximately $ 9.8 billion . significant new awards during the period included contracts for the construction of three arleigh burke class ( ddg 51 ) destroyers , for the detail design and construction of richard m . mccool jr . ( lpd 29 ) , for procurement of long-lead-time material for enterprise ( cvn 80 ) , and for the construction of nsc 10 ( unnamed ) and nsc 11 ( unnamed ) . in addition , we received awards in 2019 valued at $ 15.2 billion for detail design and construction of the gerald r . ford class ( cvn 78 ) aircraft carriers enterprise ( cvn 80 ) and cvn 81 ( unnamed ) . 2017 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was approximately $ 8.1 billion . significant new awards during this period included the detailed design and construction contract for bougainville ( lha 8 ) and the execution contract for the rcoh of uss george washington ( cvn 73 ) . .
Question: what was the operating income in 2017?
Answer: 21.0
Question: how much did this change from 2016?
Answer: 13.0
Question: and the percentage increase during this time?
Answer: 1.625
Question: between 2017 and 2018 what was the difference in operating income for the technical solutions segment?
| 11.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
december 2016 acquisition of camber and higher volumes in fleet support and oil and gas services , partially offset by lower nuclear and environmental volumes due to the resolution in 2016 of outstanding contract changes on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract . segment operating income 2018 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2018 , was $ 32 million , compared to operating income of $ 21 million in 2017 . the increase was primarily due to an allowance for accounts receivable in 2017 on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract and higher income from operating investments at our nuclear and environmental joint ventures , partially offset by one time employee bonus payments in 2018 related to the tax act and lower performance in fleet support services . 2017 - operating income in the technical solutions segment for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was $ 21 million , compared to operating income of $ 8 million in 2016 . the increase was primarily due to improved performance in oil and gas services and higher volume in mdis services following the december 2016 acquisition of camber , partially offset by the establishment of an allowance for accounts receivable on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract in 2017 and the resolution in 2016 of outstanding contract changes on a nuclear and environmental commercial contract . backlog total backlog as of december 31 , 2018 , was approximately $ 23 billion . total backlog includes both funded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is contractually obligated by the customer ) and unfunded backlog ( firm orders for which funding is not currently contractually obligated by the customer ) . backlog excludes unexercised contract options and unfunded idiq orders . for contracts having no stated contract values , backlog includes only the amounts committed by the customer . the following table presents funded and unfunded backlog by segment as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( $ in millions )</td><td>december 31 2018 funded</td><td>december 31 2018 unfunded</td><td>december 31 2018 total backlog</td><td>december 31 2018 funded</td><td>december 31 2018 unfunded</td><td>total backlog</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ingalls</td><td>$ 9943</td><td>$ 1422</td><td>$ 11365</td><td>$ 5920</td><td>$ 2071</td><td>$ 7991</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>newport news</td><td>6767</td><td>4144</td><td>10911</td><td>6976</td><td>5608</td><td>12584</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>technical solutions</td><td>339</td><td>380</td><td>719</td><td>478</td><td>314</td><td>792</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total backlog</td><td>$ 17049</td><td>$ 5946</td><td>$ 22995</td><td>$ 13374</td><td>$ 7993</td><td>$ 21367</td></tr></table> we expect approximately 30% ( 30 % ) of the $ 23 billion total backlog as of december 31 , 2018 , to be converted into sales in 2019 . u.s . government orders comprised substantially all of the backlog as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 . awards 2018 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2018 , was approximately $ 9.8 billion . significant new awards during the period included contracts for the construction of three arleigh burke class ( ddg 51 ) destroyers , for the detail design and construction of richard m . mccool jr . ( lpd 29 ) , for procurement of long-lead-time material for enterprise ( cvn 80 ) , and for the construction of nsc 10 ( unnamed ) and nsc 11 ( unnamed ) . in addition , we received awards in 2019 valued at $ 15.2 billion for detail design and construction of the gerald r . ford class ( cvn 78 ) aircraft carriers enterprise ( cvn 80 ) and cvn 81 ( unnamed ) . 2017 - the value of new contract awards during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , was approximately $ 8.1 billion . significant new awards during this period included the detailed design and construction contract for bougainville ( lha 8 ) and the execution contract for the rcoh of uss george washington ( cvn 73 ) . .
Question: what was the operating income in 2017?
Answer: 21.0
Question: how much did this change from 2016?
Answer: 13.0
Question: and the percentage increase during this time?
Answer: 1.625
Question: between 2017 and 2018 what was the difference in operating income for the technical solutions segment?
Answer: 11.0
Question: and the growth rate during this time?
| 0.52381 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
2022 expand client relationships - the overall market we serve continues to gravitate beyond single-application purchases to multi-solution partnerships . as the market dynamics shift , we expect our clients and prospects to rely more on our multidimensional service offerings . our leveraged solutions and processing expertise can produce meaningful value and cost savings for our clients through more efficient operating processes , improved service quality and convenience for our clients' customers . 2022 build global diversification - we continue to deploy resources in global markets where we expect to achieve meaningful scale . revenues by segment the table below summarizes our revenues by reporting segment ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ifs</td><td>$ 4630</td><td>$ 4525</td><td>$ 3809</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gfs</td><td>4138</td><td>4250</td><td>2361</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate and other</td><td>355</td><td>466</td><td>426</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total consolidated revenues</td><td>$ 9123</td><td>$ 9241</td><td>$ 6596</td></tr></table> integrated financial solutions ( "ifs" ) the ifs segment is focused primarily on serving north american regional and community bank and savings institutions for transaction and account processing , payment solutions , channel solutions , digital channels , fraud , risk management and compliance solutions , lending and wealth and retirement solutions , and corporate liquidity , capitalizing on the continuing trend to outsource these solutions . clients in this segment include regional and community banks , credit unions and commercial lenders , as well as government institutions , merchants and other commercial organizations . these markets are primarily served through integrated solutions and characterized by multi-year processing contracts that generate highly recurring revenues . the predictable nature of cash flows generated from this segment provides opportunities for further investments in innovation , integration , information and security , and compliance in a cost-effective manner . our solutions in this segment include : 2022 core processing and ancillary applications . our core processing software applications are designed to run banking processes for our financial institution clients , including deposit and lending systems , customer management , and other central management systems , serving as the system of record for processed activity . our diverse selection of market- focused core systems enables fis to compete effectively in a wide range of markets . we also offer a number of services that are ancillary to the primary applications listed above , including branch automation , back-office support systems and compliance support . 2022 digital solutions , including internet , mobile and ebanking . our comprehensive suite of retail delivery applications enables financial institutions to integrate and streamline customer-facing operations and back-office processes , thereby improving customer interaction across all channels ( e.g. , branch offices , internet , atm , mobile , call centers ) . fis' focus on consumer access has driven significant market innovation in this area , with multi-channel and multi-host solutions and a strategy that provides tight integration of services and a seamless customer experience . fis is a leader in mobile banking solutions and electronic banking enabling clients to manage banking and payments through the internet , mobile devices , accounting software and telephone . our corporate electronic banking solutions provide commercial treasury capabilities including cash management services and multi-bank collection and disbursement services that address the specialized needs of corporate clients . fis systems provide full accounting and reconciliation for such transactions , serving also as the system of record. .
Question: what was the change in revenues generated by the fis segment from 2016 to 2017?
| 105.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
2022 expand client relationships - the overall market we serve continues to gravitate beyond single-application purchases to multi-solution partnerships . as the market dynamics shift , we expect our clients and prospects to rely more on our multidimensional service offerings . our leveraged solutions and processing expertise can produce meaningful value and cost savings for our clients through more efficient operating processes , improved service quality and convenience for our clients' customers . 2022 build global diversification - we continue to deploy resources in global markets where we expect to achieve meaningful scale . revenues by segment the table below summarizes our revenues by reporting segment ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ifs</td><td>$ 4630</td><td>$ 4525</td><td>$ 3809</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gfs</td><td>4138</td><td>4250</td><td>2361</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate and other</td><td>355</td><td>466</td><td>426</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total consolidated revenues</td><td>$ 9123</td><td>$ 9241</td><td>$ 6596</td></tr></table> integrated financial solutions ( "ifs" ) the ifs segment is focused primarily on serving north american regional and community bank and savings institutions for transaction and account processing , payment solutions , channel solutions , digital channels , fraud , risk management and compliance solutions , lending and wealth and retirement solutions , and corporate liquidity , capitalizing on the continuing trend to outsource these solutions . clients in this segment include regional and community banks , credit unions and commercial lenders , as well as government institutions , merchants and other commercial organizations . these markets are primarily served through integrated solutions and characterized by multi-year processing contracts that generate highly recurring revenues . the predictable nature of cash flows generated from this segment provides opportunities for further investments in innovation , integration , information and security , and compliance in a cost-effective manner . our solutions in this segment include : 2022 core processing and ancillary applications . our core processing software applications are designed to run banking processes for our financial institution clients , including deposit and lending systems , customer management , and other central management systems , serving as the system of record for processed activity . our diverse selection of market- focused core systems enables fis to compete effectively in a wide range of markets . we also offer a number of services that are ancillary to the primary applications listed above , including branch automation , back-office support systems and compliance support . 2022 digital solutions , including internet , mobile and ebanking . our comprehensive suite of retail delivery applications enables financial institutions to integrate and streamline customer-facing operations and back-office processes , thereby improving customer interaction across all channels ( e.g. , branch offices , internet , atm , mobile , call centers ) . fis' focus on consumer access has driven significant market innovation in this area , with multi-channel and multi-host solutions and a strategy that provides tight integration of services and a seamless customer experience . fis is a leader in mobile banking solutions and electronic banking enabling clients to manage banking and payments through the internet , mobile devices , accounting software and telephone . our corporate electronic banking solutions provide commercial treasury capabilities including cash management services and multi-bank collection and disbursement services that address the specialized needs of corporate clients . fis systems provide full accounting and reconciliation for such transactions , serving also as the system of record. .
Question: what was the change in revenues generated by the fis segment from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 105.0
Question: and what is this change as a portion of those revenues in 2016?
| 0.0232 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
2022 expand client relationships - the overall market we serve continues to gravitate beyond single-application purchases to multi-solution partnerships . as the market dynamics shift , we expect our clients and prospects to rely more on our multidimensional service offerings . our leveraged solutions and processing expertise can produce meaningful value and cost savings for our clients through more efficient operating processes , improved service quality and convenience for our clients' customers . 2022 build global diversification - we continue to deploy resources in global markets where we expect to achieve meaningful scale . revenues by segment the table below summarizes our revenues by reporting segment ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ifs</td><td>$ 4630</td><td>$ 4525</td><td>$ 3809</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gfs</td><td>4138</td><td>4250</td><td>2361</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate and other</td><td>355</td><td>466</td><td>426</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total consolidated revenues</td><td>$ 9123</td><td>$ 9241</td><td>$ 6596</td></tr></table> integrated financial solutions ( "ifs" ) the ifs segment is focused primarily on serving north american regional and community bank and savings institutions for transaction and account processing , payment solutions , channel solutions , digital channels , fraud , risk management and compliance solutions , lending and wealth and retirement solutions , and corporate liquidity , capitalizing on the continuing trend to outsource these solutions . clients in this segment include regional and community banks , credit unions and commercial lenders , as well as government institutions , merchants and other commercial organizations . these markets are primarily served through integrated solutions and characterized by multi-year processing contracts that generate highly recurring revenues . the predictable nature of cash flows generated from this segment provides opportunities for further investments in innovation , integration , information and security , and compliance in a cost-effective manner . our solutions in this segment include : 2022 core processing and ancillary applications . our core processing software applications are designed to run banking processes for our financial institution clients , including deposit and lending systems , customer management , and other central management systems , serving as the system of record for processed activity . our diverse selection of market- focused core systems enables fis to compete effectively in a wide range of markets . we also offer a number of services that are ancillary to the primary applications listed above , including branch automation , back-office support systems and compliance support . 2022 digital solutions , including internet , mobile and ebanking . our comprehensive suite of retail delivery applications enables financial institutions to integrate and streamline customer-facing operations and back-office processes , thereby improving customer interaction across all channels ( e.g. , branch offices , internet , atm , mobile , call centers ) . fis' focus on consumer access has driven significant market innovation in this area , with multi-channel and multi-host solutions and a strategy that provides tight integration of services and a seamless customer experience . fis is a leader in mobile banking solutions and electronic banking enabling clients to manage banking and payments through the internet , mobile devices , accounting software and telephone . our corporate electronic banking solutions provide commercial treasury capabilities including cash management services and multi-bank collection and disbursement services that address the specialized needs of corporate clients . fis systems provide full accounting and reconciliation for such transactions , serving also as the system of record. .
Question: what was the change in revenues generated by the fis segment from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 105.0
Question: and what is this change as a portion of those revenues in 2016?
Answer: 0.0232
Question: in that year of 2017, what was the amount from the gfs segment?
| 4138.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
2022 expand client relationships - the overall market we serve continues to gravitate beyond single-application purchases to multi-solution partnerships . as the market dynamics shift , we expect our clients and prospects to rely more on our multidimensional service offerings . our leveraged solutions and processing expertise can produce meaningful value and cost savings for our clients through more efficient operating processes , improved service quality and convenience for our clients' customers . 2022 build global diversification - we continue to deploy resources in global markets where we expect to achieve meaningful scale . revenues by segment the table below summarizes our revenues by reporting segment ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ifs</td><td>$ 4630</td><td>$ 4525</td><td>$ 3809</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gfs</td><td>4138</td><td>4250</td><td>2361</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate and other</td><td>355</td><td>466</td><td>426</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total consolidated revenues</td><td>$ 9123</td><td>$ 9241</td><td>$ 6596</td></tr></table> integrated financial solutions ( "ifs" ) the ifs segment is focused primarily on serving north american regional and community bank and savings institutions for transaction and account processing , payment solutions , channel solutions , digital channels , fraud , risk management and compliance solutions , lending and wealth and retirement solutions , and corporate liquidity , capitalizing on the continuing trend to outsource these solutions . clients in this segment include regional and community banks , credit unions and commercial lenders , as well as government institutions , merchants and other commercial organizations . these markets are primarily served through integrated solutions and characterized by multi-year processing contracts that generate highly recurring revenues . the predictable nature of cash flows generated from this segment provides opportunities for further investments in innovation , integration , information and security , and compliance in a cost-effective manner . our solutions in this segment include : 2022 core processing and ancillary applications . our core processing software applications are designed to run banking processes for our financial institution clients , including deposit and lending systems , customer management , and other central management systems , serving as the system of record for processed activity . our diverse selection of market- focused core systems enables fis to compete effectively in a wide range of markets . we also offer a number of services that are ancillary to the primary applications listed above , including branch automation , back-office support systems and compliance support . 2022 digital solutions , including internet , mobile and ebanking . our comprehensive suite of retail delivery applications enables financial institutions to integrate and streamline customer-facing operations and back-office processes , thereby improving customer interaction across all channels ( e.g. , branch offices , internet , atm , mobile , call centers ) . fis' focus on consumer access has driven significant market innovation in this area , with multi-channel and multi-host solutions and a strategy that provides tight integration of services and a seamless customer experience . fis is a leader in mobile banking solutions and electronic banking enabling clients to manage banking and payments through the internet , mobile devices , accounting software and telephone . our corporate electronic banking solutions provide commercial treasury capabilities including cash management services and multi-bank collection and disbursement services that address the specialized needs of corporate clients . fis systems provide full accounting and reconciliation for such transactions , serving also as the system of record. .
Question: what was the change in revenues generated by the fis segment from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 105.0
Question: and what is this change as a portion of those revenues in 2016?
Answer: 0.0232
Question: in that year of 2017, what was the amount from the gfs segment?
Answer: 4138.0
Question: and what were the total consolidated revenues?
| 9123.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
2022 expand client relationships - the overall market we serve continues to gravitate beyond single-application purchases to multi-solution partnerships . as the market dynamics shift , we expect our clients and prospects to rely more on our multidimensional service offerings . our leveraged solutions and processing expertise can produce meaningful value and cost savings for our clients through more efficient operating processes , improved service quality and convenience for our clients' customers . 2022 build global diversification - we continue to deploy resources in global markets where we expect to achieve meaningful scale . revenues by segment the table below summarizes our revenues by reporting segment ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ifs</td><td>$ 4630</td><td>$ 4525</td><td>$ 3809</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gfs</td><td>4138</td><td>4250</td><td>2361</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>corporate and other</td><td>355</td><td>466</td><td>426</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total consolidated revenues</td><td>$ 9123</td><td>$ 9241</td><td>$ 6596</td></tr></table> integrated financial solutions ( "ifs" ) the ifs segment is focused primarily on serving north american regional and community bank and savings institutions for transaction and account processing , payment solutions , channel solutions , digital channels , fraud , risk management and compliance solutions , lending and wealth and retirement solutions , and corporate liquidity , capitalizing on the continuing trend to outsource these solutions . clients in this segment include regional and community banks , credit unions and commercial lenders , as well as government institutions , merchants and other commercial organizations . these markets are primarily served through integrated solutions and characterized by multi-year processing contracts that generate highly recurring revenues . the predictable nature of cash flows generated from this segment provides opportunities for further investments in innovation , integration , information and security , and compliance in a cost-effective manner . our solutions in this segment include : 2022 core processing and ancillary applications . our core processing software applications are designed to run banking processes for our financial institution clients , including deposit and lending systems , customer management , and other central management systems , serving as the system of record for processed activity . our diverse selection of market- focused core systems enables fis to compete effectively in a wide range of markets . we also offer a number of services that are ancillary to the primary applications listed above , including branch automation , back-office support systems and compliance support . 2022 digital solutions , including internet , mobile and ebanking . our comprehensive suite of retail delivery applications enables financial institutions to integrate and streamline customer-facing operations and back-office processes , thereby improving customer interaction across all channels ( e.g. , branch offices , internet , atm , mobile , call centers ) . fis' focus on consumer access has driven significant market innovation in this area , with multi-channel and multi-host solutions and a strategy that provides tight integration of services and a seamless customer experience . fis is a leader in mobile banking solutions and electronic banking enabling clients to manage banking and payments through the internet , mobile devices , accounting software and telephone . our corporate electronic banking solutions provide commercial treasury capabilities including cash management services and multi-bank collection and disbursement services that address the specialized needs of corporate clients . fis systems provide full accounting and reconciliation for such transactions , serving also as the system of record. .
Question: what was the change in revenues generated by the fis segment from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 105.0
Question: and what is this change as a portion of those revenues in 2016?
Answer: 0.0232
Question: in that year of 2017, what was the amount from the gfs segment?
Answer: 4138.0
Question: and what were the total consolidated revenues?
Answer: 9123.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total did that amount represent?
| 0.45358 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
segment includes awe and our share of earnings for our investment in ula , which provides expendable launch services to the u.s . government . space systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 9409</td><td>$ 9105</td><td>$ 9202</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1289</td><td>1171</td><td>1187</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>13.7% ( 13.7 % )</td><td>12.9% ( 12.9 % )</td><td>12.9% ( 12.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog atyear-end</td><td>$ 18900</td><td>$ 17400</td><td>$ 20300</td></tr></table> 2016 compared to 2015 space systems 2019 net sales in 2016 increased $ 304 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , compared to 2015 . the increase was attributable to net sales of approximately $ 410 million from awe following the consolidation of this business in the third quarter of 2016 ; and approximately $ 150 million for commercial space transportation programs due to increased launch-related activities ; and approximately $ 70 million of higher net sales for various programs ( primarily fleet ballistic missiles ) due to increased volume . these increases were partially offset by a decrease in net sales of approximately $ 340 million for government satellite programs due to decreased volume ( primarily sbirs and muos ) and the wind-down or completion of mission solutions programs . space systems 2019 operating profit in 2016 increased $ 118 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2015 . the increase was primarily attributable to a non-cash , pre-tax gain of approximately $ 127 million related to the consolidation of awe ; and approximately $ 80 million of increased equity earnings from joint ventures ( primarily ula ) . these increases were partially offset by a decrease of approximately $ 105 million for government satellite programs due to lower risk retirements ( primarily sbirs , muos and mission solutions programs ) and decreased volume . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were approximately $ 185 million lower in 2016 compared to 2015 . 2015 compared to 2014 space systems 2019 net sales in 2015 decreased $ 97 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , compared to 2014 . the decrease was attributable to approximately $ 335 million lower net sales for government satellite programs due to decreased volume ( primarily aehf ) and the wind-down or completion of mission solutions programs ; and approximately $ 55 million for strategic missile and defense systems due to lower volume . these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 235 million for businesses acquired in 2014 ; and approximately $ 75 million for the orion program due to increased volume . space systems 2019 operating profit in 2015 decreased $ 16 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased approximately $ 85 million for government satellite programs due primarily to increased risk retirements . this increase was offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 65 million for commercial satellite programs due to performance matters on certain programs ; and approximately $ 35 million due to decreased equity earnings in joint ventures . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . equity earnings total equity earnings recognized by space systems ( primarily ula ) represented approximately $ 325 million , $ 245 million and $ 280 million , or 25% ( 25 % ) , 21% ( 21 % ) and 24% ( 24 % ) of this business segment 2019s operating profit during 2016 , 2015 and backlog backlog increased in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to the addition of awe 2019s backlog . backlog decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to lower orders for government satellite programs and the orion program and higher sales on the orion program . trends we expect space systems 2019 2017 net sales to decrease in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2016 , driven by program lifecycles on government satellite programs , partially offset by the recognition of awe net sales for a full year in 2017 versus a partial year in 2016 following the consolidation of awe in the third quarter of 2016 . operating profit .
Question: what was net sales in 2015?
| 9105.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
segment includes awe and our share of earnings for our investment in ula , which provides expendable launch services to the u.s . government . space systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 9409</td><td>$ 9105</td><td>$ 9202</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1289</td><td>1171</td><td>1187</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>13.7% ( 13.7 % )</td><td>12.9% ( 12.9 % )</td><td>12.9% ( 12.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog atyear-end</td><td>$ 18900</td><td>$ 17400</td><td>$ 20300</td></tr></table> 2016 compared to 2015 space systems 2019 net sales in 2016 increased $ 304 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , compared to 2015 . the increase was attributable to net sales of approximately $ 410 million from awe following the consolidation of this business in the third quarter of 2016 ; and approximately $ 150 million for commercial space transportation programs due to increased launch-related activities ; and approximately $ 70 million of higher net sales for various programs ( primarily fleet ballistic missiles ) due to increased volume . these increases were partially offset by a decrease in net sales of approximately $ 340 million for government satellite programs due to decreased volume ( primarily sbirs and muos ) and the wind-down or completion of mission solutions programs . space systems 2019 operating profit in 2016 increased $ 118 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2015 . the increase was primarily attributable to a non-cash , pre-tax gain of approximately $ 127 million related to the consolidation of awe ; and approximately $ 80 million of increased equity earnings from joint ventures ( primarily ula ) . these increases were partially offset by a decrease of approximately $ 105 million for government satellite programs due to lower risk retirements ( primarily sbirs , muos and mission solutions programs ) and decreased volume . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were approximately $ 185 million lower in 2016 compared to 2015 . 2015 compared to 2014 space systems 2019 net sales in 2015 decreased $ 97 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , compared to 2014 . the decrease was attributable to approximately $ 335 million lower net sales for government satellite programs due to decreased volume ( primarily aehf ) and the wind-down or completion of mission solutions programs ; and approximately $ 55 million for strategic missile and defense systems due to lower volume . these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 235 million for businesses acquired in 2014 ; and approximately $ 75 million for the orion program due to increased volume . space systems 2019 operating profit in 2015 decreased $ 16 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased approximately $ 85 million for government satellite programs due primarily to increased risk retirements . this increase was offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 65 million for commercial satellite programs due to performance matters on certain programs ; and approximately $ 35 million due to decreased equity earnings in joint ventures . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . equity earnings total equity earnings recognized by space systems ( primarily ula ) represented approximately $ 325 million , $ 245 million and $ 280 million , or 25% ( 25 % ) , 21% ( 21 % ) and 24% ( 24 % ) of this business segment 2019s operating profit during 2016 , 2015 and backlog backlog increased in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to the addition of awe 2019s backlog . backlog decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to lower orders for government satellite programs and the orion program and higher sales on the orion program . trends we expect space systems 2019 2017 net sales to decrease in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2016 , driven by program lifecycles on government satellite programs , partially offset by the recognition of awe net sales for a full year in 2017 versus a partial year in 2016 following the consolidation of awe in the third quarter of 2016 . operating profit .
Question: what was net sales in 2015?
Answer: 9105.0
Question: and in 2014?
| 9202.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
segment includes awe and our share of earnings for our investment in ula , which provides expendable launch services to the u.s . government . space systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 9409</td><td>$ 9105</td><td>$ 9202</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1289</td><td>1171</td><td>1187</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>13.7% ( 13.7 % )</td><td>12.9% ( 12.9 % )</td><td>12.9% ( 12.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog atyear-end</td><td>$ 18900</td><td>$ 17400</td><td>$ 20300</td></tr></table> 2016 compared to 2015 space systems 2019 net sales in 2016 increased $ 304 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , compared to 2015 . the increase was attributable to net sales of approximately $ 410 million from awe following the consolidation of this business in the third quarter of 2016 ; and approximately $ 150 million for commercial space transportation programs due to increased launch-related activities ; and approximately $ 70 million of higher net sales for various programs ( primarily fleet ballistic missiles ) due to increased volume . these increases were partially offset by a decrease in net sales of approximately $ 340 million for government satellite programs due to decreased volume ( primarily sbirs and muos ) and the wind-down or completion of mission solutions programs . space systems 2019 operating profit in 2016 increased $ 118 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2015 . the increase was primarily attributable to a non-cash , pre-tax gain of approximately $ 127 million related to the consolidation of awe ; and approximately $ 80 million of increased equity earnings from joint ventures ( primarily ula ) . these increases were partially offset by a decrease of approximately $ 105 million for government satellite programs due to lower risk retirements ( primarily sbirs , muos and mission solutions programs ) and decreased volume . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were approximately $ 185 million lower in 2016 compared to 2015 . 2015 compared to 2014 space systems 2019 net sales in 2015 decreased $ 97 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , compared to 2014 . the decrease was attributable to approximately $ 335 million lower net sales for government satellite programs due to decreased volume ( primarily aehf ) and the wind-down or completion of mission solutions programs ; and approximately $ 55 million for strategic missile and defense systems due to lower volume . these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 235 million for businesses acquired in 2014 ; and approximately $ 75 million for the orion program due to increased volume . space systems 2019 operating profit in 2015 decreased $ 16 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased approximately $ 85 million for government satellite programs due primarily to increased risk retirements . this increase was offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 65 million for commercial satellite programs due to performance matters on certain programs ; and approximately $ 35 million due to decreased equity earnings in joint ventures . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . equity earnings total equity earnings recognized by space systems ( primarily ula ) represented approximately $ 325 million , $ 245 million and $ 280 million , or 25% ( 25 % ) , 21% ( 21 % ) and 24% ( 24 % ) of this business segment 2019s operating profit during 2016 , 2015 and backlog backlog increased in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to the addition of awe 2019s backlog . backlog decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to lower orders for government satellite programs and the orion program and higher sales on the orion program . trends we expect space systems 2019 2017 net sales to decrease in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2016 , driven by program lifecycles on government satellite programs , partially offset by the recognition of awe net sales for a full year in 2017 versus a partial year in 2016 following the consolidation of awe in the third quarter of 2016 . operating profit .
Question: what was net sales in 2015?
Answer: 9105.0
Question: and in 2014?
Answer: 9202.0
Question: what was the difference between these two years?
| -97.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
segment includes awe and our share of earnings for our investment in ula , which provides expendable launch services to the u.s . government . space systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 9409</td><td>$ 9105</td><td>$ 9202</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1289</td><td>1171</td><td>1187</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>13.7% ( 13.7 % )</td><td>12.9% ( 12.9 % )</td><td>12.9% ( 12.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog atyear-end</td><td>$ 18900</td><td>$ 17400</td><td>$ 20300</td></tr></table> 2016 compared to 2015 space systems 2019 net sales in 2016 increased $ 304 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , compared to 2015 . the increase was attributable to net sales of approximately $ 410 million from awe following the consolidation of this business in the third quarter of 2016 ; and approximately $ 150 million for commercial space transportation programs due to increased launch-related activities ; and approximately $ 70 million of higher net sales for various programs ( primarily fleet ballistic missiles ) due to increased volume . these increases were partially offset by a decrease in net sales of approximately $ 340 million for government satellite programs due to decreased volume ( primarily sbirs and muos ) and the wind-down or completion of mission solutions programs . space systems 2019 operating profit in 2016 increased $ 118 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2015 . the increase was primarily attributable to a non-cash , pre-tax gain of approximately $ 127 million related to the consolidation of awe ; and approximately $ 80 million of increased equity earnings from joint ventures ( primarily ula ) . these increases were partially offset by a decrease of approximately $ 105 million for government satellite programs due to lower risk retirements ( primarily sbirs , muos and mission solutions programs ) and decreased volume . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were approximately $ 185 million lower in 2016 compared to 2015 . 2015 compared to 2014 space systems 2019 net sales in 2015 decreased $ 97 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , compared to 2014 . the decrease was attributable to approximately $ 335 million lower net sales for government satellite programs due to decreased volume ( primarily aehf ) and the wind-down or completion of mission solutions programs ; and approximately $ 55 million for strategic missile and defense systems due to lower volume . these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 235 million for businesses acquired in 2014 ; and approximately $ 75 million for the orion program due to increased volume . space systems 2019 operating profit in 2015 decreased $ 16 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased approximately $ 85 million for government satellite programs due primarily to increased risk retirements . this increase was offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 65 million for commercial satellite programs due to performance matters on certain programs ; and approximately $ 35 million due to decreased equity earnings in joint ventures . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . equity earnings total equity earnings recognized by space systems ( primarily ula ) represented approximately $ 325 million , $ 245 million and $ 280 million , or 25% ( 25 % ) , 21% ( 21 % ) and 24% ( 24 % ) of this business segment 2019s operating profit during 2016 , 2015 and backlog backlog increased in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to the addition of awe 2019s backlog . backlog decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to lower orders for government satellite programs and the orion program and higher sales on the orion program . trends we expect space systems 2019 2017 net sales to decrease in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2016 , driven by program lifecycles on government satellite programs , partially offset by the recognition of awe net sales for a full year in 2017 versus a partial year in 2016 following the consolidation of awe in the third quarter of 2016 . operating profit .
Question: what was net sales in 2015?
Answer: 9105.0
Question: and in 2014?
Answer: 9202.0
Question: what was the difference between these two years?
Answer: -97.0
Question: and the specific value for 2014 again?
| 9202.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
segment includes awe and our share of earnings for our investment in ula , which provides expendable launch services to the u.s . government . space systems 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 9409</td><td>$ 9105</td><td>$ 9202</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1289</td><td>1171</td><td>1187</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>13.7% ( 13.7 % )</td><td>12.9% ( 12.9 % )</td><td>12.9% ( 12.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog atyear-end</td><td>$ 18900</td><td>$ 17400</td><td>$ 20300</td></tr></table> 2016 compared to 2015 space systems 2019 net sales in 2016 increased $ 304 million , or 3% ( 3 % ) , compared to 2015 . the increase was attributable to net sales of approximately $ 410 million from awe following the consolidation of this business in the third quarter of 2016 ; and approximately $ 150 million for commercial space transportation programs due to increased launch-related activities ; and approximately $ 70 million of higher net sales for various programs ( primarily fleet ballistic missiles ) due to increased volume . these increases were partially offset by a decrease in net sales of approximately $ 340 million for government satellite programs due to decreased volume ( primarily sbirs and muos ) and the wind-down or completion of mission solutions programs . space systems 2019 operating profit in 2016 increased $ 118 million , or 10% ( 10 % ) , compared to 2015 . the increase was primarily attributable to a non-cash , pre-tax gain of approximately $ 127 million related to the consolidation of awe ; and approximately $ 80 million of increased equity earnings from joint ventures ( primarily ula ) . these increases were partially offset by a decrease of approximately $ 105 million for government satellite programs due to lower risk retirements ( primarily sbirs , muos and mission solutions programs ) and decreased volume . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments , were approximately $ 185 million lower in 2016 compared to 2015 . 2015 compared to 2014 space systems 2019 net sales in 2015 decreased $ 97 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , compared to 2014 . the decrease was attributable to approximately $ 335 million lower net sales for government satellite programs due to decreased volume ( primarily aehf ) and the wind-down or completion of mission solutions programs ; and approximately $ 55 million for strategic missile and defense systems due to lower volume . these decreases were partially offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 235 million for businesses acquired in 2014 ; and approximately $ 75 million for the orion program due to increased volume . space systems 2019 operating profit in 2015 decreased $ 16 million , or 1% ( 1 % ) , compared to 2014 . operating profit increased approximately $ 85 million for government satellite programs due primarily to increased risk retirements . this increase was offset by lower operating profit of approximately $ 65 million for commercial satellite programs due to performance matters on certain programs ; and approximately $ 35 million due to decreased equity earnings in joint ventures . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were approximately $ 105 million higher in 2015 compared to 2014 . equity earnings total equity earnings recognized by space systems ( primarily ula ) represented approximately $ 325 million , $ 245 million and $ 280 million , or 25% ( 25 % ) , 21% ( 21 % ) and 24% ( 24 % ) of this business segment 2019s operating profit during 2016 , 2015 and backlog backlog increased in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to the addition of awe 2019s backlog . backlog decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to lower orders for government satellite programs and the orion program and higher sales on the orion program . trends we expect space systems 2019 2017 net sales to decrease in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2016 , driven by program lifecycles on government satellite programs , partially offset by the recognition of awe net sales for a full year in 2017 versus a partial year in 2016 following the consolidation of awe in the third quarter of 2016 . operating profit .
Question: what was net sales in 2015?
Answer: 9105.0
Question: and in 2014?
Answer: 9202.0
Question: what was the difference between these two years?
Answer: -97.0
Question: and the specific value for 2014 again?
Answer: 9202.0
Question: so what was the change as a percentage of the original value?
| -0.01054 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american , european and asia/pacific cruise guests over the past five years ( in thousands , except berth data ) : weighted- average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 ) global cruise guests ( 1 ) american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 )</td><td>globalcruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>north american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 )</td><td>european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 )</td><td>asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>425000</td><td>98650</td><td>20813</td><td>11641</td><td>6225</td><td>1474</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>432000</td><td>98750</td><td>21343</td><td>11710</td><td>6430</td><td>2045</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>448000</td><td>105750</td><td>22039</td><td>12269</td><td>6387</td><td>2382</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>469000</td><td>112700</td><td>23000</td><td>12004</td><td>6587</td><td>3129</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>493000</td><td>123270</td><td>24000</td><td>12581</td><td>6542</td><td>3636</td></tr></table> _______________________________________________________________________________ ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources . we use data obtained from seatrade insider , cruise industry news and company press releases to estimate weighted-average supply of berths and clia and g.p . wild to estimate cruise guest information . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) total berths include our berths related to our global brands and partner brands . ( 3 ) our estimates include the united states and canada . ( 4 ) our estimates include european countries relevant to the industry ( e.g. , nordics , germany , france , italy , spain and the united kingdom ) . ( 5 ) our estimates include the southeast asia ( e.g. , singapore , thailand and the philippines ) , east asia ( e.g. , china and japan ) , south asia ( e.g. , india and pakistan ) and oceanian ( e.g. , australia and fiji islands ) regions . north america the majority of industry cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 52% ( 52 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 2% ( 2 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . europe industry cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 27% ( 27 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . asia/pacific industry cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 25% ( 25 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . the asia/pacific region is experiencing the highest growth rate of the major regions , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america . competition we compete with a number of cruise lines . our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise line , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , p&o cruises , princess cruises and seabourn ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; and norwegian cruise line holdings ltd , which owns norwegian cruise line , oceania cruises and regent seven seas cruises . cruise lines compete with .
Question: what is the net change in weighted-average supply of berths market ed globally from 2012 to 2016?
| 68000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american , european and asia/pacific cruise guests over the past five years ( in thousands , except berth data ) : weighted- average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 ) global cruise guests ( 1 ) american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 )</td><td>globalcruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>north american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 )</td><td>european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 )</td><td>asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>425000</td><td>98650</td><td>20813</td><td>11641</td><td>6225</td><td>1474</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>432000</td><td>98750</td><td>21343</td><td>11710</td><td>6430</td><td>2045</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>448000</td><td>105750</td><td>22039</td><td>12269</td><td>6387</td><td>2382</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>469000</td><td>112700</td><td>23000</td><td>12004</td><td>6587</td><td>3129</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>493000</td><td>123270</td><td>24000</td><td>12581</td><td>6542</td><td>3636</td></tr></table> _______________________________________________________________________________ ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources . we use data obtained from seatrade insider , cruise industry news and company press releases to estimate weighted-average supply of berths and clia and g.p . wild to estimate cruise guest information . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) total berths include our berths related to our global brands and partner brands . ( 3 ) our estimates include the united states and canada . ( 4 ) our estimates include european countries relevant to the industry ( e.g. , nordics , germany , france , italy , spain and the united kingdom ) . ( 5 ) our estimates include the southeast asia ( e.g. , singapore , thailand and the philippines ) , east asia ( e.g. , china and japan ) , south asia ( e.g. , india and pakistan ) and oceanian ( e.g. , australia and fiji islands ) regions . north america the majority of industry cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 52% ( 52 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 2% ( 2 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . europe industry cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 27% ( 27 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . asia/pacific industry cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 25% ( 25 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . the asia/pacific region is experiencing the highest growth rate of the major regions , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america . competition we compete with a number of cruise lines . our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise line , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , p&o cruises , princess cruises and seabourn ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; and norwegian cruise line holdings ltd , which owns norwegian cruise line , oceania cruises and regent seven seas cruises . cruise lines compete with .
Question: what is the net change in weighted-average supply of berths market ed globally from 2012 to 2016?
Answer: 68000.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.16 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
table of contents index to financial statements item 3 . legal proceedings . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable . part ii price range our common stock trades on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d . the range of closing price information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on february 16 , 2012 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq global select market was $ 32.65 . holders there were 41 holders of record of our common stock as of february 16 , 2012 . dividend policy we initiated a regular quarterly dividend in the fourth quarter of 2009 . during 2010 and 2011 , we paid quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.07 per share and $ 0.09 per share , respectively . in january 2012 , our board of directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.11 per share payable on march 1 , 2012 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on february 16 , 2012 . any future declaration and payment of dividends will be at the sole discretion of the company 2019s board of directors . the board of directors may take into account such matters as general business conditions , the company 2019s financial results , capital requirements , contractual , legal , and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends to the company 2019s stockholders or by the company 2019s subsidiaries to the parent and any such other factors as the board of directors may deem relevant . recent sales of unregistered securities item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011:</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1 2011 to march 31 2011</td><td>$ 24.19</td><td>$ 19.78</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>april 1 2011 to june 30 2011</td><td>$ 25.22</td><td>$ 21.00</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>july 1 2011 to september 30 2011</td><td>$ 30.75</td><td>$ 23.41</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>october 1 2011 to december 31 2011</td><td>$ 31.16</td><td>$ 24.57</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2010:</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>january 1 2010 to march 31 2010</td><td>$ 16.20</td><td>$ 13.25</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>april 1 2010 to june 30 2010</td><td>$ 17.40</td><td>$ 13.45</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>july 1 2010 to september 30 2010</td><td>$ 17.30</td><td>$ 12.39</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>october 1 2010 to december 31 2010</td><td>$ 20.93</td><td>$ 16.93</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the total quarterly cash dividends per quarter in 2010 and 2011?
| 0.16 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
table of contents index to financial statements item 3 . legal proceedings . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable . part ii price range our common stock trades on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d . the range of closing price information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on february 16 , 2012 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq global select market was $ 32.65 . holders there were 41 holders of record of our common stock as of february 16 , 2012 . dividend policy we initiated a regular quarterly dividend in the fourth quarter of 2009 . during 2010 and 2011 , we paid quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.07 per share and $ 0.09 per share , respectively . in january 2012 , our board of directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.11 per share payable on march 1 , 2012 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on february 16 , 2012 . any future declaration and payment of dividends will be at the sole discretion of the company 2019s board of directors . the board of directors may take into account such matters as general business conditions , the company 2019s financial results , capital requirements , contractual , legal , and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends to the company 2019s stockholders or by the company 2019s subsidiaries to the parent and any such other factors as the board of directors may deem relevant . recent sales of unregistered securities item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011:</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1 2011 to march 31 2011</td><td>$ 24.19</td><td>$ 19.78</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>april 1 2011 to june 30 2011</td><td>$ 25.22</td><td>$ 21.00</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>july 1 2011 to september 30 2011</td><td>$ 30.75</td><td>$ 23.41</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>october 1 2011 to december 31 2011</td><td>$ 31.16</td><td>$ 24.57</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2010:</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>january 1 2010 to march 31 2010</td><td>$ 16.20</td><td>$ 13.25</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>april 1 2010 to june 30 2010</td><td>$ 17.40</td><td>$ 13.45</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>july 1 2010 to september 30 2010</td><td>$ 17.30</td><td>$ 12.39</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>october 1 2010 to december 31 2010</td><td>$ 20.93</td><td>$ 16.93</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the total quarterly cash dividends per quarter in 2010 and 2011?
Answer: 0.16
Question: what is the total variation in stock price from april 1, 2011 to june 30, 2011?
| 4.22 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
other taxes decreased in 2001 because its utility operations in virginia became subject to state income taxes in lieu of gross receipts taxes effective january 2001 . in addition , dominion recognized higher effective rates for foreign earnings and higher pretax income in relation to non-conventional fuel tax credits realized . dominion energy 2002 2001 2000 ( millions , except per share amounts ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions except pershare amounts )</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating revenue</td><td>$ 5940</td><td>$ 6144</td><td>$ 4894</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating expenses</td><td>4520</td><td>4749</td><td>3939</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income contribution</td><td>770</td><td>723</td><td>489</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>earnings per share contribution</td><td>$ 2.72</td><td>$ 2.86</td><td>$ 2.07</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>electricity supplied* ( million mwhrs )</td><td>101</td><td>95</td><td>83</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gas transmission throughput ( bcf )</td><td>597</td><td>553</td><td>567</td></tr></table> * amounts presented are for electricity supplied by utility and merchant generation operations . operating results 2014 2002 dominion energy contributed $ 2.72 per diluted share on net income of $ 770 million for 2002 , a net income increase of $ 47 million and an earnings per share decrease of $ 0.14 over 2001 . net income for 2002 reflected lower operating revenue ( $ 204 million ) , operating expenses ( $ 229 million ) and other income ( $ 27 million ) . interest expense and income taxes , which are discussed on a consolidated basis , decreased $ 50 million over 2001 . the earnings per share decrease reflected share dilution . regulated electric sales revenue increased $ 179 million . favorable weather conditions , reflecting increased cooling and heating degree-days , as well as customer growth , are estimated to have contributed $ 133 million and $ 41 million , respectively . fuel rate recoveries increased approximately $ 65 million for 2002 . these recoveries are generally offset by increases in elec- tric fuel expense and do not materially affect income . partially offsetting these increases was a net decrease of $ 60 million due to other factors not separately measurable , such as the impact of economic conditions on customer usage , as well as variations in seasonal rate premiums and discounts . nonregulated electric sales revenue increased $ 9 million . sales revenue from dominion 2019s merchant generation fleet decreased $ 21 million , reflecting a $ 201 million decline due to lower prices partially offset by sales from assets acquired and constructed in 2002 and the inclusion of millstone operations for all of 2002 . revenue from the wholesale marketing of utility generation decreased $ 74 million . due to the higher demand of utility service territory customers during 2002 , less production from utility plant generation was available for profitable sale in the wholesale market . revenue from retail energy sales increased $ 71 million , reflecting primarily customer growth over the prior year . net revenue from dominion 2019s electric trading activities increased $ 33 million , reflecting the effect of favorable price changes on unsettled contracts and higher trading margins . nonregulated gas sales revenue decreased $ 351 million . the decrease included a $ 239 million decrease in sales by dominion 2019s field services and retail energy marketing opera- tions , reflecting to a large extent declining prices . revenue associated with gas trading operations , net of related cost of sales , decreased $ 112 million . the decrease included $ 70 mil- lion of realized and unrealized losses on the economic hedges of natural gas production by the dominion exploration & pro- duction segment . as described below under selected information 2014 energy trading activities , sales of natural gas by the dominion exploration & production segment at market prices offset these financial losses , resulting in a range of prices contemplated by dominion 2019s overall risk management strategy . the remaining $ 42 million decrease was due to unfavorable price changes on unsettled contracts and lower overall trading margins . those losses were partially offset by contributions from higher trading volumes in gas and oil markets . gas transportation and storage revenue decreased $ 44 million , primarily reflecting lower rates . electric fuel and energy purchases expense increased $ 94 million which included an increase of $ 66 million associated with dominion 2019s energy marketing operations that are not sub- ject to cost-based rate regulation and an increase of $ 28 million associated with utility operations . substantially all of the increase associated with non-regulated energy marketing opera- tions related to higher volumes purchased during the year . for utility operations , energy costs increased $ 66 million for pur- chases subject to rate recovery , partially offset by a $ 38 million decrease in fuel expenses associated with lower wholesale mar- keting of utility plant generation . purchased gas expense decreased $ 245 million associated with dominion 2019s field services and retail energy marketing oper- ations . this decrease reflected approximately $ 162 million asso- ciated with declining prices and $ 83 million associated with lower purchased volumes . liquids , pipeline capacity and other purchases decreased $ 64 million , primarily reflecting comparably lower levels of rate recoveries of certain costs of transmission operations in the cur- rent year period . the difference between actual expenses and amounts recovered in the period are deferred pending future rate adjustments . other operations and maintenance expense decreased $ 14 million , primarily reflecting an $ 18 million decrease in outage costs due to fewer generation unit outages in the current year . depreciation expense decreased $ 11 million , reflecting decreases in depreciation associated with changes in the esti- mated useful lives of certain electric generation property , par- tially offset by increased depreciation associated with state line and millstone operations . other income decreased $ 27 million , including a $ 14 mil- lion decrease in net realized investment gains in the millstone 37d o m i n i o n 2019 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t .
Question: what was the net change in operating revenue from 2001 to 2002?
| -204.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
other taxes decreased in 2001 because its utility operations in virginia became subject to state income taxes in lieu of gross receipts taxes effective january 2001 . in addition , dominion recognized higher effective rates for foreign earnings and higher pretax income in relation to non-conventional fuel tax credits realized . dominion energy 2002 2001 2000 ( millions , except per share amounts ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions except pershare amounts )</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating revenue</td><td>$ 5940</td><td>$ 6144</td><td>$ 4894</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating expenses</td><td>4520</td><td>4749</td><td>3939</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income contribution</td><td>770</td><td>723</td><td>489</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>earnings per share contribution</td><td>$ 2.72</td><td>$ 2.86</td><td>$ 2.07</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>electricity supplied* ( million mwhrs )</td><td>101</td><td>95</td><td>83</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gas transmission throughput ( bcf )</td><td>597</td><td>553</td><td>567</td></tr></table> * amounts presented are for electricity supplied by utility and merchant generation operations . operating results 2014 2002 dominion energy contributed $ 2.72 per diluted share on net income of $ 770 million for 2002 , a net income increase of $ 47 million and an earnings per share decrease of $ 0.14 over 2001 . net income for 2002 reflected lower operating revenue ( $ 204 million ) , operating expenses ( $ 229 million ) and other income ( $ 27 million ) . interest expense and income taxes , which are discussed on a consolidated basis , decreased $ 50 million over 2001 . the earnings per share decrease reflected share dilution . regulated electric sales revenue increased $ 179 million . favorable weather conditions , reflecting increased cooling and heating degree-days , as well as customer growth , are estimated to have contributed $ 133 million and $ 41 million , respectively . fuel rate recoveries increased approximately $ 65 million for 2002 . these recoveries are generally offset by increases in elec- tric fuel expense and do not materially affect income . partially offsetting these increases was a net decrease of $ 60 million due to other factors not separately measurable , such as the impact of economic conditions on customer usage , as well as variations in seasonal rate premiums and discounts . nonregulated electric sales revenue increased $ 9 million . sales revenue from dominion 2019s merchant generation fleet decreased $ 21 million , reflecting a $ 201 million decline due to lower prices partially offset by sales from assets acquired and constructed in 2002 and the inclusion of millstone operations for all of 2002 . revenue from the wholesale marketing of utility generation decreased $ 74 million . due to the higher demand of utility service territory customers during 2002 , less production from utility plant generation was available for profitable sale in the wholesale market . revenue from retail energy sales increased $ 71 million , reflecting primarily customer growth over the prior year . net revenue from dominion 2019s electric trading activities increased $ 33 million , reflecting the effect of favorable price changes on unsettled contracts and higher trading margins . nonregulated gas sales revenue decreased $ 351 million . the decrease included a $ 239 million decrease in sales by dominion 2019s field services and retail energy marketing opera- tions , reflecting to a large extent declining prices . revenue associated with gas trading operations , net of related cost of sales , decreased $ 112 million . the decrease included $ 70 mil- lion of realized and unrealized losses on the economic hedges of natural gas production by the dominion exploration & pro- duction segment . as described below under selected information 2014 energy trading activities , sales of natural gas by the dominion exploration & production segment at market prices offset these financial losses , resulting in a range of prices contemplated by dominion 2019s overall risk management strategy . the remaining $ 42 million decrease was due to unfavorable price changes on unsettled contracts and lower overall trading margins . those losses were partially offset by contributions from higher trading volumes in gas and oil markets . gas transportation and storage revenue decreased $ 44 million , primarily reflecting lower rates . electric fuel and energy purchases expense increased $ 94 million which included an increase of $ 66 million associated with dominion 2019s energy marketing operations that are not sub- ject to cost-based rate regulation and an increase of $ 28 million associated with utility operations . substantially all of the increase associated with non-regulated energy marketing opera- tions related to higher volumes purchased during the year . for utility operations , energy costs increased $ 66 million for pur- chases subject to rate recovery , partially offset by a $ 38 million decrease in fuel expenses associated with lower wholesale mar- keting of utility plant generation . purchased gas expense decreased $ 245 million associated with dominion 2019s field services and retail energy marketing oper- ations . this decrease reflected approximately $ 162 million asso- ciated with declining prices and $ 83 million associated with lower purchased volumes . liquids , pipeline capacity and other purchases decreased $ 64 million , primarily reflecting comparably lower levels of rate recoveries of certain costs of transmission operations in the cur- rent year period . the difference between actual expenses and amounts recovered in the period are deferred pending future rate adjustments . other operations and maintenance expense decreased $ 14 million , primarily reflecting an $ 18 million decrease in outage costs due to fewer generation unit outages in the current year . depreciation expense decreased $ 11 million , reflecting decreases in depreciation associated with changes in the esti- mated useful lives of certain electric generation property , par- tially offset by increased depreciation associated with state line and millstone operations . other income decreased $ 27 million , including a $ 14 mil- lion decrease in net realized investment gains in the millstone 37d o m i n i o n 2019 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t .
Question: what was the net change in operating revenue from 2001 to 2002?
Answer: -204.0
Question: what was operating revenue in 2001?
| 6144.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
other taxes decreased in 2001 because its utility operations in virginia became subject to state income taxes in lieu of gross receipts taxes effective january 2001 . in addition , dominion recognized higher effective rates for foreign earnings and higher pretax income in relation to non-conventional fuel tax credits realized . dominion energy 2002 2001 2000 ( millions , except per share amounts ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions except pershare amounts )</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating revenue</td><td>$ 5940</td><td>$ 6144</td><td>$ 4894</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating expenses</td><td>4520</td><td>4749</td><td>3939</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income contribution</td><td>770</td><td>723</td><td>489</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>earnings per share contribution</td><td>$ 2.72</td><td>$ 2.86</td><td>$ 2.07</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>electricity supplied* ( million mwhrs )</td><td>101</td><td>95</td><td>83</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gas transmission throughput ( bcf )</td><td>597</td><td>553</td><td>567</td></tr></table> * amounts presented are for electricity supplied by utility and merchant generation operations . operating results 2014 2002 dominion energy contributed $ 2.72 per diluted share on net income of $ 770 million for 2002 , a net income increase of $ 47 million and an earnings per share decrease of $ 0.14 over 2001 . net income for 2002 reflected lower operating revenue ( $ 204 million ) , operating expenses ( $ 229 million ) and other income ( $ 27 million ) . interest expense and income taxes , which are discussed on a consolidated basis , decreased $ 50 million over 2001 . the earnings per share decrease reflected share dilution . regulated electric sales revenue increased $ 179 million . favorable weather conditions , reflecting increased cooling and heating degree-days , as well as customer growth , are estimated to have contributed $ 133 million and $ 41 million , respectively . fuel rate recoveries increased approximately $ 65 million for 2002 . these recoveries are generally offset by increases in elec- tric fuel expense and do not materially affect income . partially offsetting these increases was a net decrease of $ 60 million due to other factors not separately measurable , such as the impact of economic conditions on customer usage , as well as variations in seasonal rate premiums and discounts . nonregulated electric sales revenue increased $ 9 million . sales revenue from dominion 2019s merchant generation fleet decreased $ 21 million , reflecting a $ 201 million decline due to lower prices partially offset by sales from assets acquired and constructed in 2002 and the inclusion of millstone operations for all of 2002 . revenue from the wholesale marketing of utility generation decreased $ 74 million . due to the higher demand of utility service territory customers during 2002 , less production from utility plant generation was available for profitable sale in the wholesale market . revenue from retail energy sales increased $ 71 million , reflecting primarily customer growth over the prior year . net revenue from dominion 2019s electric trading activities increased $ 33 million , reflecting the effect of favorable price changes on unsettled contracts and higher trading margins . nonregulated gas sales revenue decreased $ 351 million . the decrease included a $ 239 million decrease in sales by dominion 2019s field services and retail energy marketing opera- tions , reflecting to a large extent declining prices . revenue associated with gas trading operations , net of related cost of sales , decreased $ 112 million . the decrease included $ 70 mil- lion of realized and unrealized losses on the economic hedges of natural gas production by the dominion exploration & pro- duction segment . as described below under selected information 2014 energy trading activities , sales of natural gas by the dominion exploration & production segment at market prices offset these financial losses , resulting in a range of prices contemplated by dominion 2019s overall risk management strategy . the remaining $ 42 million decrease was due to unfavorable price changes on unsettled contracts and lower overall trading margins . those losses were partially offset by contributions from higher trading volumes in gas and oil markets . gas transportation and storage revenue decreased $ 44 million , primarily reflecting lower rates . electric fuel and energy purchases expense increased $ 94 million which included an increase of $ 66 million associated with dominion 2019s energy marketing operations that are not sub- ject to cost-based rate regulation and an increase of $ 28 million associated with utility operations . substantially all of the increase associated with non-regulated energy marketing opera- tions related to higher volumes purchased during the year . for utility operations , energy costs increased $ 66 million for pur- chases subject to rate recovery , partially offset by a $ 38 million decrease in fuel expenses associated with lower wholesale mar- keting of utility plant generation . purchased gas expense decreased $ 245 million associated with dominion 2019s field services and retail energy marketing oper- ations . this decrease reflected approximately $ 162 million asso- ciated with declining prices and $ 83 million associated with lower purchased volumes . liquids , pipeline capacity and other purchases decreased $ 64 million , primarily reflecting comparably lower levels of rate recoveries of certain costs of transmission operations in the cur- rent year period . the difference between actual expenses and amounts recovered in the period are deferred pending future rate adjustments . other operations and maintenance expense decreased $ 14 million , primarily reflecting an $ 18 million decrease in outage costs due to fewer generation unit outages in the current year . depreciation expense decreased $ 11 million , reflecting decreases in depreciation associated with changes in the esti- mated useful lives of certain electric generation property , par- tially offset by increased depreciation associated with state line and millstone operations . other income decreased $ 27 million , including a $ 14 mil- lion decrease in net realized investment gains in the millstone 37d o m i n i o n 2019 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t .
Question: what was the net change in operating revenue from 2001 to 2002?
Answer: -204.0
Question: what was operating revenue in 2001?
Answer: 6144.0
Question: what is the net change over the 2001 operating revenue?
| -0.0332 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2003 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 5/08 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/03 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>global payments</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p information technology</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>may 31 2003</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>may 31 2004</td><td>137.75</td><td>118.33</td><td>121.98</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>may 31 2005</td><td>205.20</td><td>128.07</td><td>123.08</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>may 31 2006</td><td>276.37</td><td>139.14</td><td>123.99</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>may 31 2007</td><td>238.04</td><td>170.85</td><td>152.54</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>may 31 2008</td><td>281.27</td><td>159.41</td><td>156.43</td></tr></table> issuer purchases of equity securities in fiscal 2007 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program that authorized the purchase of up to $ 100 million of global payments 2019 stock in the open market or as otherwise may be determined by us , subject to market conditions , business opportunities , and other factors . under this authorization , we have repurchased 2.3 million shares of our common stock . this authorization has no expiration date and may be suspended or terminated at any time . repurchased shares will be retired but will be available for future issuance. .
Question: what is the value of global payments in 2014?
| 137.75 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2003 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 5/08 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/03 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>global payments</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p information technology</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>may 31 2003</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>may 31 2004</td><td>137.75</td><td>118.33</td><td>121.98</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>may 31 2005</td><td>205.20</td><td>128.07</td><td>123.08</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>may 31 2006</td><td>276.37</td><td>139.14</td><td>123.99</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>may 31 2007</td><td>238.04</td><td>170.85</td><td>152.54</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>may 31 2008</td><td>281.27</td><td>159.41</td><td>156.43</td></tr></table> issuer purchases of equity securities in fiscal 2007 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program that authorized the purchase of up to $ 100 million of global payments 2019 stock in the open market or as otherwise may be determined by us , subject to market conditions , business opportunities , and other factors . under this authorization , we have repurchased 2.3 million shares of our common stock . this authorization has no expiration date and may be suspended or terminated at any time . repurchased shares will be retired but will be available for future issuance. .
Question: what is the value of global payments in 2014?
Answer: 137.75
Question: what is that less 100?
| 37.75 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2003 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 5/08 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/03 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>global payments</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p information technology</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>may 31 2003</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>may 31 2004</td><td>137.75</td><td>118.33</td><td>121.98</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>may 31 2005</td><td>205.20</td><td>128.07</td><td>123.08</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>may 31 2006</td><td>276.37</td><td>139.14</td><td>123.99</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>may 31 2007</td><td>238.04</td><td>170.85</td><td>152.54</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>may 31 2008</td><td>281.27</td><td>159.41</td><td>156.43</td></tr></table> issuer purchases of equity securities in fiscal 2007 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program that authorized the purchase of up to $ 100 million of global payments 2019 stock in the open market or as otherwise may be determined by us , subject to market conditions , business opportunities , and other factors . under this authorization , we have repurchased 2.3 million shares of our common stock . this authorization has no expiration date and may be suspended or terminated at any time . repurchased shares will be retired but will be available for future issuance. .
Question: what is the value of global payments in 2014?
Answer: 137.75
Question: what is that less 100?
Answer: 37.75
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.3775 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements when they are determined uncollectible . such determination includes analysis and consideration of the particular conditions of the account . changes in the allowances were as follows for the years ended december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1</td><td>$ 24412</td><td>$ 22505</td><td>$ 28520</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year increases</td><td>8028</td><td>17008</td><td>16219</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs net of recoveries and other</td><td>-12034 ( 12034 )</td><td>-15101 ( 15101 )</td><td>-22234 ( 22234 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31</td><td>$ 20406</td><td>$ 24412</td><td>$ 22505</td></tr></table> functional currency 2014as a result of changes to the organizational structure of the company 2019s subsidiaries in latin america in 2010 , the company determined that effective january 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of its foreign subsidiary in brazil is the brazilian real . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by the subsidiary in brazil are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in equity . the change in functional currency from u.s . dollars to brazilian real gave rise to an increase in the net value of certain non-monetary assets and liabilities . the aggregate impact on such assets and liabilities was $ 39.8 million with an offsetting increase in accumulated other comprehensive income during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . as a result of the renegotiation of the company 2019s agreements with grupo iusacell , s.a . de c.v . ( 201ciusacell 201d ) , which included , among other changes , converting iusacell 2019s contractual obligations to the company from u.s . dollars to mexican pesos , the company determined that effective april 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of certain of its foreign subsidiaries in mexico is the mexican peso . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by those subsidiaries in mexico are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in equity . the change in functional currency from u.s . dollars to mexican pesos gave rise to a decrease in the net value of certain non-monetary assets and liabilities . the aggregate impact on such assets and liabilities was $ 33.6 million with an offsetting decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income . the functional currency of the company 2019s other foreign operating subsidiaries is also the respective local currency . all assets and liabilities held by the subsidiaries are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable fiscal reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates . the cumulative translation effect is included in equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and are the result of transactions of a subsidiary being denominated in a currency other than its functional currency . cash and cash equivalents 2014cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand , demand deposits and short-term investments , including money market funds , with remaining maturities of three months or less when acquired , whose cost approximates fair value . restricted cash 2014the company classifies as restricted cash all cash pledged as collateral to secure obligations and all cash whose use is otherwise limited by contractual provisions , including cash on deposit in reserve accounts relating to the commercial mortgage pass-through certificates , series 2007-1 issued in the company 2019s securitization transaction and the secured cellular site revenue notes , series 2010-1 class c , series 2010-2 class c and series 2010-2 class f , assumed by the company as a result of the acquisition of certain legal entities from unison holdings , llc and unison site management ii , l.l.c . ( collectively , 201cunison 201d ) . .
Question: what was the balance as of 12/31/12?
| 20406.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements when they are determined uncollectible . such determination includes analysis and consideration of the particular conditions of the account . changes in the allowances were as follows for the years ended december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1</td><td>$ 24412</td><td>$ 22505</td><td>$ 28520</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year increases</td><td>8028</td><td>17008</td><td>16219</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs net of recoveries and other</td><td>-12034 ( 12034 )</td><td>-15101 ( 15101 )</td><td>-22234 ( 22234 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31</td><td>$ 20406</td><td>$ 24412</td><td>$ 22505</td></tr></table> functional currency 2014as a result of changes to the organizational structure of the company 2019s subsidiaries in latin america in 2010 , the company determined that effective january 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of its foreign subsidiary in brazil is the brazilian real . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by the subsidiary in brazil are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in equity . the change in functional currency from u.s . dollars to brazilian real gave rise to an increase in the net value of certain non-monetary assets and liabilities . the aggregate impact on such assets and liabilities was $ 39.8 million with an offsetting increase in accumulated other comprehensive income during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . as a result of the renegotiation of the company 2019s agreements with grupo iusacell , s.a . de c.v . ( 201ciusacell 201d ) , which included , among other changes , converting iusacell 2019s contractual obligations to the company from u.s . dollars to mexican pesos , the company determined that effective april 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of certain of its foreign subsidiaries in mexico is the mexican peso . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by those subsidiaries in mexico are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in equity . the change in functional currency from u.s . dollars to mexican pesos gave rise to a decrease in the net value of certain non-monetary assets and liabilities . the aggregate impact on such assets and liabilities was $ 33.6 million with an offsetting decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income . the functional currency of the company 2019s other foreign operating subsidiaries is also the respective local currency . all assets and liabilities held by the subsidiaries are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable fiscal reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates . the cumulative translation effect is included in equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and are the result of transactions of a subsidiary being denominated in a currency other than its functional currency . cash and cash equivalents 2014cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand , demand deposits and short-term investments , including money market funds , with remaining maturities of three months or less when acquired , whose cost approximates fair value . restricted cash 2014the company classifies as restricted cash all cash pledged as collateral to secure obligations and all cash whose use is otherwise limited by contractual provisions , including cash on deposit in reserve accounts relating to the commercial mortgage pass-through certificates , series 2007-1 issued in the company 2019s securitization transaction and the secured cellular site revenue notes , series 2010-1 class c , series 2010-2 class c and series 2010-2 class f , assumed by the company as a result of the acquisition of certain legal entities from unison holdings , llc and unison site management ii , l.l.c . ( collectively , 201cunison 201d ) . .
Question: what was the balance as of 12/31/12?
Answer: 20406.0
Question: and as of 12/31/11?
| 24412.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements when they are determined uncollectible . such determination includes analysis and consideration of the particular conditions of the account . changes in the allowances were as follows for the years ended december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1</td><td>$ 24412</td><td>$ 22505</td><td>$ 28520</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year increases</td><td>8028</td><td>17008</td><td>16219</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs net of recoveries and other</td><td>-12034 ( 12034 )</td><td>-15101 ( 15101 )</td><td>-22234 ( 22234 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31</td><td>$ 20406</td><td>$ 24412</td><td>$ 22505</td></tr></table> functional currency 2014as a result of changes to the organizational structure of the company 2019s subsidiaries in latin america in 2010 , the company determined that effective january 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of its foreign subsidiary in brazil is the brazilian real . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by the subsidiary in brazil are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in equity . the change in functional currency from u.s . dollars to brazilian real gave rise to an increase in the net value of certain non-monetary assets and liabilities . the aggregate impact on such assets and liabilities was $ 39.8 million with an offsetting increase in accumulated other comprehensive income during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . as a result of the renegotiation of the company 2019s agreements with grupo iusacell , s.a . de c.v . ( 201ciusacell 201d ) , which included , among other changes , converting iusacell 2019s contractual obligations to the company from u.s . dollars to mexican pesos , the company determined that effective april 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of certain of its foreign subsidiaries in mexico is the mexican peso . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by those subsidiaries in mexico are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in equity . the change in functional currency from u.s . dollars to mexican pesos gave rise to a decrease in the net value of certain non-monetary assets and liabilities . the aggregate impact on such assets and liabilities was $ 33.6 million with an offsetting decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income . the functional currency of the company 2019s other foreign operating subsidiaries is also the respective local currency . all assets and liabilities held by the subsidiaries are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable fiscal reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates . the cumulative translation effect is included in equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and are the result of transactions of a subsidiary being denominated in a currency other than its functional currency . cash and cash equivalents 2014cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand , demand deposits and short-term investments , including money market funds , with remaining maturities of three months or less when acquired , whose cost approximates fair value . restricted cash 2014the company classifies as restricted cash all cash pledged as collateral to secure obligations and all cash whose use is otherwise limited by contractual provisions , including cash on deposit in reserve accounts relating to the commercial mortgage pass-through certificates , series 2007-1 issued in the company 2019s securitization transaction and the secured cellular site revenue notes , series 2010-1 class c , series 2010-2 class c and series 2010-2 class f , assumed by the company as a result of the acquisition of certain legal entities from unison holdings , llc and unison site management ii , l.l.c . ( collectively , 201cunison 201d ) . .
Question: what was the balance as of 12/31/12?
Answer: 20406.0
Question: and as of 12/31/11?
Answer: 24412.0
Question: and what was the difference between these two values?
| -4006.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements when they are determined uncollectible . such determination includes analysis and consideration of the particular conditions of the account . changes in the allowances were as follows for the years ended december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1</td><td>$ 24412</td><td>$ 22505</td><td>$ 28520</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year increases</td><td>8028</td><td>17008</td><td>16219</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs net of recoveries and other</td><td>-12034 ( 12034 )</td><td>-15101 ( 15101 )</td><td>-22234 ( 22234 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31</td><td>$ 20406</td><td>$ 24412</td><td>$ 22505</td></tr></table> functional currency 2014as a result of changes to the organizational structure of the company 2019s subsidiaries in latin america in 2010 , the company determined that effective january 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of its foreign subsidiary in brazil is the brazilian real . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by the subsidiary in brazil are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in equity . the change in functional currency from u.s . dollars to brazilian real gave rise to an increase in the net value of certain non-monetary assets and liabilities . the aggregate impact on such assets and liabilities was $ 39.8 million with an offsetting increase in accumulated other comprehensive income during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . as a result of the renegotiation of the company 2019s agreements with grupo iusacell , s.a . de c.v . ( 201ciusacell 201d ) , which included , among other changes , converting iusacell 2019s contractual obligations to the company from u.s . dollars to mexican pesos , the company determined that effective april 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of certain of its foreign subsidiaries in mexico is the mexican peso . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by those subsidiaries in mexico are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in equity . the change in functional currency from u.s . dollars to mexican pesos gave rise to a decrease in the net value of certain non-monetary assets and liabilities . the aggregate impact on such assets and liabilities was $ 33.6 million with an offsetting decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income . the functional currency of the company 2019s other foreign operating subsidiaries is also the respective local currency . all assets and liabilities held by the subsidiaries are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable fiscal reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates . the cumulative translation effect is included in equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and are the result of transactions of a subsidiary being denominated in a currency other than its functional currency . cash and cash equivalents 2014cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand , demand deposits and short-term investments , including money market funds , with remaining maturities of three months or less when acquired , whose cost approximates fair value . restricted cash 2014the company classifies as restricted cash all cash pledged as collateral to secure obligations and all cash whose use is otherwise limited by contractual provisions , including cash on deposit in reserve accounts relating to the commercial mortgage pass-through certificates , series 2007-1 issued in the company 2019s securitization transaction and the secured cellular site revenue notes , series 2010-1 class c , series 2010-2 class c and series 2010-2 class f , assumed by the company as a result of the acquisition of certain legal entities from unison holdings , llc and unison site management ii , l.l.c . ( collectively , 201cunison 201d ) . .
Question: what was the balance as of 12/31/12?
Answer: 20406.0
Question: and as of 12/31/11?
Answer: 24412.0
Question: and what was the difference between these two values?
Answer: -4006.0
Question: and the value for 2011 specifically?
| 24412.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements when they are determined uncollectible . such determination includes analysis and consideration of the particular conditions of the account . changes in the allowances were as follows for the years ended december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1</td><td>$ 24412</td><td>$ 22505</td><td>$ 28520</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year increases</td><td>8028</td><td>17008</td><td>16219</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs net of recoveries and other</td><td>-12034 ( 12034 )</td><td>-15101 ( 15101 )</td><td>-22234 ( 22234 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31</td><td>$ 20406</td><td>$ 24412</td><td>$ 22505</td></tr></table> functional currency 2014as a result of changes to the organizational structure of the company 2019s subsidiaries in latin america in 2010 , the company determined that effective january 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of its foreign subsidiary in brazil is the brazilian real . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by the subsidiary in brazil are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in equity . the change in functional currency from u.s . dollars to brazilian real gave rise to an increase in the net value of certain non-monetary assets and liabilities . the aggregate impact on such assets and liabilities was $ 39.8 million with an offsetting increase in accumulated other comprehensive income during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . as a result of the renegotiation of the company 2019s agreements with grupo iusacell , s.a . de c.v . ( 201ciusacell 201d ) , which included , among other changes , converting iusacell 2019s contractual obligations to the company from u.s . dollars to mexican pesos , the company determined that effective april 1 , 2010 , the functional currency of certain of its foreign subsidiaries in mexico is the mexican peso . from that point forward , all assets and liabilities held by those subsidiaries in mexico are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates and the cumulative translation effect is included in equity . the change in functional currency from u.s . dollars to mexican pesos gave rise to a decrease in the net value of certain non-monetary assets and liabilities . the aggregate impact on such assets and liabilities was $ 33.6 million with an offsetting decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income . the functional currency of the company 2019s other foreign operating subsidiaries is also the respective local currency . all assets and liabilities held by the subsidiaries are translated into u.s . dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the applicable fiscal reporting period . revenues and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates . the cumulative translation effect is included in equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and are the result of transactions of a subsidiary being denominated in a currency other than its functional currency . cash and cash equivalents 2014cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand , demand deposits and short-term investments , including money market funds , with remaining maturities of three months or less when acquired , whose cost approximates fair value . restricted cash 2014the company classifies as restricted cash all cash pledged as collateral to secure obligations and all cash whose use is otherwise limited by contractual provisions , including cash on deposit in reserve accounts relating to the commercial mortgage pass-through certificates , series 2007-1 issued in the company 2019s securitization transaction and the secured cellular site revenue notes , series 2010-1 class c , series 2010-2 class c and series 2010-2 class f , assumed by the company as a result of the acquisition of certain legal entities from unison holdings , llc and unison site management ii , l.l.c . ( collectively , 201cunison 201d ) . .
Question: what was the balance as of 12/31/12?
Answer: 20406.0
Question: and as of 12/31/11?
Answer: 24412.0
Question: and what was the difference between these two values?
Answer: -4006.0
Question: and the value for 2011 specifically?
Answer: 24412.0
Question: and the percentage change during this time?
| -0.1641 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
consolidated income statement review our consolidated income statement is presented in item 8 of this report . net income for 2012 was $ 3.0 billion compared with $ 3.1 billion for 2011 . revenue growth of 8 percent and a decline in the provision for credit losses were more than offset by a 16 percent increase in noninterest expense in 2012 compared to 2011 . further detail is included in the net interest income , noninterest income , provision for credit losses and noninterest expense portions of this consolidated income statement review . net interest income table 2 : net interest income and net interest margin year ended december 31 dollars in millions 2012 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31dollars in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest income</td><td>$ 9640</td><td>$ 8700</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net interest margin</td><td>3.94% ( 3.94 % )</td><td>3.92% ( 3.92 % )</td></tr></table> changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields , interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid , and noninterest-bearing sources of funding . see the statistical information ( unaudited ) 2013 average consolidated balance sheet and net interest analysis and analysis of year-to-year changes in net interest income in item 8 of this report and the discussion of purchase accounting accretion of purchased impaired loans in the consolidated balance sheet review in this item 7 for additional information . the increase in net interest income in 2012 compared with 2011 was primarily due to the impact of the rbc bank ( usa ) acquisition , organic loan growth and lower funding costs . purchase accounting accretion remained stable at $ 1.1 billion in both periods . the net interest margin was 3.94% ( 3.94 % ) for 2012 and 3.92% ( 3.92 % ) for 2011 . the increase in the comparison was primarily due to a decrease in the weighted-average rate accrued on total interest- bearing liabilities of 29 basis points , largely offset by a 21 basis point decrease on the yield on total interest-earning assets . the decrease in the rate on interest-bearing liabilities was primarily due to the runoff of maturing retail certificates of deposit and the redemption of additional trust preferred and hybrid capital securities during 2012 , in addition to an increase in fhlb borrowings and commercial paper as lower-cost funding sources . the decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets was primarily due to lower rates on new loan volume and lower yields on new securities in the current low rate environment . with respect to the first quarter of 2013 , we expect net interest income to decline by two to three percent compared to fourth quarter 2012 net interest income of $ 2.4 billion , due to a decrease in purchase accounting accretion of up to $ 50 to $ 60 million , including lower expected cash recoveries . for the full year 2013 , we expect net interest income to decrease compared with 2012 , assuming an expected decline in purchase accounting accretion of approximately $ 400 million , while core net interest income is expected to increase in the year-over-year comparison . we believe our net interest margin will come under pressure in 2013 , due to the expected decline in purchase accounting accretion and assuming that the current low rate environment continues . noninterest income noninterest income totaled $ 5.9 billion for 2012 and $ 5.6 billion for 2011 . the overall increase in the comparison was primarily due to an increase in residential mortgage loan sales revenue driven by higher loan origination volume , gains on sales of visa class b common shares and higher corporate service fees , largely offset by higher provision for residential mortgage repurchase obligations . asset management revenue , including blackrock , totaled $ 1.2 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 . this increase was primarily due to higher earnings from our blackrock investment . discretionary assets under management increased to $ 112 billion at december 31 , 2012 compared with $ 107 billion at december 31 , 2011 driven by stronger average equity markets , positive net flows and strong sales performance . for 2012 , consumer services fees were $ 1.1 billion compared with $ 1.2 billion in 2011 . the decline reflected the regulatory impact of lower interchange fees on debit card transactions partially offset by customer growth . as further discussed in the retail banking portion of the business segments review section of this item 7 , the dodd-frank limits on interchange rates were effective october 1 , 2011 and had a negative impact on revenue of approximately $ 314 million in 2012 and $ 75 million in 2011 . this impact was partially offset by higher volumes of merchant , customer credit card and debit card transactions and the impact of the rbc bank ( usa ) acquisition . corporate services revenue increased by $ .3 billion , or 30 percent , to $ 1.2 billion in 2012 compared with $ .9 billion in 2011 due to higher commercial mortgage servicing revenue and higher merger and acquisition advisory fees in 2012 . the major components of corporate services revenue are treasury management revenue , corporate finance fees , including revenue from capital markets-related products and services , and commercial mortgage servicing revenue , including commercial mortgage banking activities . see the product revenue portion of this consolidated income statement review for further detail . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 39 .
Question: what was the change in the non interest income from 2011 to 2012?
| 0.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
consolidated income statement review our consolidated income statement is presented in item 8 of this report . net income for 2012 was $ 3.0 billion compared with $ 3.1 billion for 2011 . revenue growth of 8 percent and a decline in the provision for credit losses were more than offset by a 16 percent increase in noninterest expense in 2012 compared to 2011 . further detail is included in the net interest income , noninterest income , provision for credit losses and noninterest expense portions of this consolidated income statement review . net interest income table 2 : net interest income and net interest margin year ended december 31 dollars in millions 2012 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31dollars in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest income</td><td>$ 9640</td><td>$ 8700</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net interest margin</td><td>3.94% ( 3.94 % )</td><td>3.92% ( 3.92 % )</td></tr></table> changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields , interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid , and noninterest-bearing sources of funding . see the statistical information ( unaudited ) 2013 average consolidated balance sheet and net interest analysis and analysis of year-to-year changes in net interest income in item 8 of this report and the discussion of purchase accounting accretion of purchased impaired loans in the consolidated balance sheet review in this item 7 for additional information . the increase in net interest income in 2012 compared with 2011 was primarily due to the impact of the rbc bank ( usa ) acquisition , organic loan growth and lower funding costs . purchase accounting accretion remained stable at $ 1.1 billion in both periods . the net interest margin was 3.94% ( 3.94 % ) for 2012 and 3.92% ( 3.92 % ) for 2011 . the increase in the comparison was primarily due to a decrease in the weighted-average rate accrued on total interest- bearing liabilities of 29 basis points , largely offset by a 21 basis point decrease on the yield on total interest-earning assets . the decrease in the rate on interest-bearing liabilities was primarily due to the runoff of maturing retail certificates of deposit and the redemption of additional trust preferred and hybrid capital securities during 2012 , in addition to an increase in fhlb borrowings and commercial paper as lower-cost funding sources . the decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets was primarily due to lower rates on new loan volume and lower yields on new securities in the current low rate environment . with respect to the first quarter of 2013 , we expect net interest income to decline by two to three percent compared to fourth quarter 2012 net interest income of $ 2.4 billion , due to a decrease in purchase accounting accretion of up to $ 50 to $ 60 million , including lower expected cash recoveries . for the full year 2013 , we expect net interest income to decrease compared with 2012 , assuming an expected decline in purchase accounting accretion of approximately $ 400 million , while core net interest income is expected to increase in the year-over-year comparison . we believe our net interest margin will come under pressure in 2013 , due to the expected decline in purchase accounting accretion and assuming that the current low rate environment continues . noninterest income noninterest income totaled $ 5.9 billion for 2012 and $ 5.6 billion for 2011 . the overall increase in the comparison was primarily due to an increase in residential mortgage loan sales revenue driven by higher loan origination volume , gains on sales of visa class b common shares and higher corporate service fees , largely offset by higher provision for residential mortgage repurchase obligations . asset management revenue , including blackrock , totaled $ 1.2 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 . this increase was primarily due to higher earnings from our blackrock investment . discretionary assets under management increased to $ 112 billion at december 31 , 2012 compared with $ 107 billion at december 31 , 2011 driven by stronger average equity markets , positive net flows and strong sales performance . for 2012 , consumer services fees were $ 1.1 billion compared with $ 1.2 billion in 2011 . the decline reflected the regulatory impact of lower interchange fees on debit card transactions partially offset by customer growth . as further discussed in the retail banking portion of the business segments review section of this item 7 , the dodd-frank limits on interchange rates were effective october 1 , 2011 and had a negative impact on revenue of approximately $ 314 million in 2012 and $ 75 million in 2011 . this impact was partially offset by higher volumes of merchant , customer credit card and debit card transactions and the impact of the rbc bank ( usa ) acquisition . corporate services revenue increased by $ .3 billion , or 30 percent , to $ 1.2 billion in 2012 compared with $ .9 billion in 2011 due to higher commercial mortgage servicing revenue and higher merger and acquisition advisory fees in 2012 . the major components of corporate services revenue are treasury management revenue , corporate finance fees , including revenue from capital markets-related products and services , and commercial mortgage servicing revenue , including commercial mortgage banking activities . see the product revenue portion of this consolidated income statement review for further detail . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 39 .
Question: what was the change in the non interest income from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 0.3
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that income in 2011, in percentage?
| 0.05357 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
backlog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments . backlog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months . backlog by reportable segment as of october 25 , 2015 and october 26 , 2014 was as follows : 2015 2014 ( in millions , except percentages ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions except percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>silicon systems</td><td>$ 1720</td><td>55% ( 55 % )</td><td>$ 1400</td><td>48% ( 48 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>applied global services</td><td>812</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>775</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>display</td><td>525</td><td>16% ( 16 % )</td><td>593</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>energy and environmental solutions</td><td>85</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td><td>149</td><td>5% ( 5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3142</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>$ 2917</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> applied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or order cancellations . customers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties . delays in delivery schedules or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations . manufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies that are used to manufacture systems . applied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including germany , israel , italy , singapore , taiwan , the united states and other countries in asia . applied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products , including some systems being completed at customer sites . although applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible . accordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers . applied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ensuring quality and performance of parts. .
Question: what was the change in the backlog from 2014 to 2015?
| 225.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
backlog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments . backlog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months . backlog by reportable segment as of october 25 , 2015 and october 26 , 2014 was as follows : 2015 2014 ( in millions , except percentages ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions except percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>silicon systems</td><td>$ 1720</td><td>55% ( 55 % )</td><td>$ 1400</td><td>48% ( 48 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>applied global services</td><td>812</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>775</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>display</td><td>525</td><td>16% ( 16 % )</td><td>593</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>energy and environmental solutions</td><td>85</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td><td>149</td><td>5% ( 5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3142</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>$ 2917</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> applied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or order cancellations . customers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties . delays in delivery schedules or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations . manufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies that are used to manufacture systems . applied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including germany , israel , italy , singapore , taiwan , the united states and other countries in asia . applied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products , including some systems being completed at customer sites . although applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible . accordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers . applied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ensuring quality and performance of parts. .
Question: what was the change in the backlog from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: 225.0
Question: and what was that backlog in 2014?
| 2917.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
backlog applied manufactures systems to meet demand represented by order backlog and customer commitments . backlog consists of : ( 1 ) orders for which written authorizations have been accepted and assigned shipment dates are within the next 12 months , or shipment has occurred but revenue has not been recognized ; and ( 2 ) contractual service revenue and maintenance fees to be earned within the next 12 months . backlog by reportable segment as of october 25 , 2015 and october 26 , 2014 was as follows : 2015 2014 ( in millions , except percentages ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions except percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>silicon systems</td><td>$ 1720</td><td>55% ( 55 % )</td><td>$ 1400</td><td>48% ( 48 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>applied global services</td><td>812</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>775</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>display</td><td>525</td><td>16% ( 16 % )</td><td>593</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>energy and environmental solutions</td><td>85</td><td>3% ( 3 % )</td><td>149</td><td>5% ( 5 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3142</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>$ 2917</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> applied 2019s backlog on any particular date is not necessarily indicative of actual sales for any future periods , due to the potential for customer changes in delivery schedules or order cancellations . customers may delay delivery of products or cancel orders prior to shipment , subject to possible cancellation penalties . delays in delivery schedules or a reduction of backlog during any particular period could have a material adverse effect on applied 2019s business and results of operations . manufacturing , raw materials and supplies applied 2019s manufacturing activities consist primarily of assembly , test and integration of various proprietary and commercial parts , components and subassemblies that are used to manufacture systems . applied has implemented a distributed manufacturing model under which manufacturing and supply chain activities are conducted in various countries , including germany , israel , italy , singapore , taiwan , the united states and other countries in asia . applied uses numerous vendors , including contract manufacturers , to supply parts and assembly services for the manufacture and support of its products , including some systems being completed at customer sites . although applied makes reasonable efforts to assure that parts are available from multiple qualified suppliers , this is not always possible . accordingly , some key parts may be obtained from only a single supplier or a limited group of suppliers . applied seeks to reduce costs and to lower the risks of manufacturing and service interruptions by selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts ; monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers ; maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts ; qualifying new parts on a timely basis ; and ensuring quality and performance of parts. .
Question: what was the change in the backlog from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: 225.0
Question: and what was that backlog in 2014?
Answer: 2917.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2014 backlog, in percentage?
| 0.07713 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) pro forma disclosure 2014the company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no . 123 , as amended by sfas no . 148 , and has presented such disclosure in note 1 . the 201cfair value 201d of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model . the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted during 2004 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 7.05 , $ 6.32 , and $ 2.23 per share , respectively . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>approximate risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.23% ( 4.23 % )</td><td>4.00% ( 4.00 % )</td><td>4.53% ( 4.53 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected life of option grants</td><td>4 years</td><td>4 years</td><td>5 years</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility of underlying stock ( the company plan )</td><td>80.6% ( 80.6 % )</td><td>86.6% ( 86.6 % )</td><td>92.3% ( 92.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected volatility of underlying stock ( atc mexico and atc south america plans )</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>expected dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> voluntary option exchanges 2014in february 2004 , the company issued to eligible employees 1032717 options with an exercise price of $ 11.19 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant . these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in august 2003 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options ( having an exercise price of $ 10.25 or greater ) to purchase 1831981 shares of its class a common stock . the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option . no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date . in may 2002 , the company issued to eligible employees 2027612 options with an exercise price of $ 3.84 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant . these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in october 2001 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options to purchase 3471211 shares of its class a common stock . the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding most of the company 2019s executive officers , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option . no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date . atc mexico holding stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc mexico subsidiary ( atc mexico plan ) . the atc mexico plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc mexico . the atc mexico plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 360 shares , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc mexico 2019s capital structure . during 2002 , atc mexico granted options to purchase 318 shares of atc mexico common stock to officers and employees . such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 10000 per share . the exercise price per share was at fair market value as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request . the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . as described in note 10 , all outstanding options were exercised in march 2004 . no options under the atc mexico plan were granted in 2004 or 2003 , or exercised or cancelled in 2003 or 2002 , and no options were exercisable as of december 31 , 2003 or 2002 . ( see note 10. ) .
Question: what is the the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted in 2003?
| 6.32 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) pro forma disclosure 2014the company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no . 123 , as amended by sfas no . 148 , and has presented such disclosure in note 1 . the 201cfair value 201d of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model . the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted during 2004 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 7.05 , $ 6.32 , and $ 2.23 per share , respectively . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>approximate risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.23% ( 4.23 % )</td><td>4.00% ( 4.00 % )</td><td>4.53% ( 4.53 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected life of option grants</td><td>4 years</td><td>4 years</td><td>5 years</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility of underlying stock ( the company plan )</td><td>80.6% ( 80.6 % )</td><td>86.6% ( 86.6 % )</td><td>92.3% ( 92.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected volatility of underlying stock ( atc mexico and atc south america plans )</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>expected dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> voluntary option exchanges 2014in february 2004 , the company issued to eligible employees 1032717 options with an exercise price of $ 11.19 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant . these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in august 2003 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options ( having an exercise price of $ 10.25 or greater ) to purchase 1831981 shares of its class a common stock . the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option . no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date . in may 2002 , the company issued to eligible employees 2027612 options with an exercise price of $ 3.84 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant . these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in october 2001 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options to purchase 3471211 shares of its class a common stock . the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding most of the company 2019s executive officers , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option . no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date . atc mexico holding stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc mexico subsidiary ( atc mexico plan ) . the atc mexico plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc mexico . the atc mexico plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 360 shares , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc mexico 2019s capital structure . during 2002 , atc mexico granted options to purchase 318 shares of atc mexico common stock to officers and employees . such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 10000 per share . the exercise price per share was at fair market value as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request . the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . as described in note 10 , all outstanding options were exercised in march 2004 . no options under the atc mexico plan were granted in 2004 or 2003 , or exercised or cancelled in 2003 or 2002 , and no options were exercisable as of december 31 , 2003 or 2002 . ( see note 10. ) .
Question: what is the the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted in 2003?
Answer: 6.32
Question: what about 2002?
| 2.23 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) pro forma disclosure 2014the company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no . 123 , as amended by sfas no . 148 , and has presented such disclosure in note 1 . the 201cfair value 201d of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model . the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted during 2004 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 7.05 , $ 6.32 , and $ 2.23 per share , respectively . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>approximate risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.23% ( 4.23 % )</td><td>4.00% ( 4.00 % )</td><td>4.53% ( 4.53 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected life of option grants</td><td>4 years</td><td>4 years</td><td>5 years</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility of underlying stock ( the company plan )</td><td>80.6% ( 80.6 % )</td><td>86.6% ( 86.6 % )</td><td>92.3% ( 92.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected volatility of underlying stock ( atc mexico and atc south america plans )</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>expected dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> voluntary option exchanges 2014in february 2004 , the company issued to eligible employees 1032717 options with an exercise price of $ 11.19 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant . these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in august 2003 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options ( having an exercise price of $ 10.25 or greater ) to purchase 1831981 shares of its class a common stock . the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option . no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date . in may 2002 , the company issued to eligible employees 2027612 options with an exercise price of $ 3.84 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant . these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in october 2001 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options to purchase 3471211 shares of its class a common stock . the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding most of the company 2019s executive officers , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option . no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date . atc mexico holding stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc mexico subsidiary ( atc mexico plan ) . the atc mexico plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc mexico . the atc mexico plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 360 shares , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc mexico 2019s capital structure . during 2002 , atc mexico granted options to purchase 318 shares of atc mexico common stock to officers and employees . such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 10000 per share . the exercise price per share was at fair market value as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request . the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . as described in note 10 , all outstanding options were exercised in march 2004 . no options under the atc mexico plan were granted in 2004 or 2003 , or exercised or cancelled in 2003 or 2002 , and no options were exercisable as of december 31 , 2003 or 2002 . ( see note 10. ) .
Question: what is the the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted in 2003?
Answer: 6.32
Question: what about 2002?
Answer: 2.23
Question: what is the difference in weighted average fair values between these years?
| 4.09 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) pro forma disclosure 2014the company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of sfas no . 123 , as amended by sfas no . 148 , and has presented such disclosure in note 1 . the 201cfair value 201d of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the black-scholes option pricing model . the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted during 2004 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 7.05 , $ 6.32 , and $ 2.23 per share , respectively . key assumptions used to apply this pricing model are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>approximate risk-free interest rate</td><td>4.23% ( 4.23 % )</td><td>4.00% ( 4.00 % )</td><td>4.53% ( 4.53 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected life of option grants</td><td>4 years</td><td>4 years</td><td>5 years</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility of underlying stock ( the company plan )</td><td>80.6% ( 80.6 % )</td><td>86.6% ( 86.6 % )</td><td>92.3% ( 92.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected volatility of underlying stock ( atc mexico and atc south america plans )</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>expected dividends</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> voluntary option exchanges 2014in february 2004 , the company issued to eligible employees 1032717 options with an exercise price of $ 11.19 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant . these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in august 2003 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options ( having an exercise price of $ 10.25 or greater ) to purchase 1831981 shares of its class a common stock . the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding the company 2019s executive officers and its directors , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option . no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date . in may 2002 , the company issued to eligible employees 2027612 options with an exercise price of $ 3.84 per share , the fair market value of the class a common stock on the date of grant . these options were issued in connection with a voluntary option exchange program entered into by the company in october 2001 , where the company accepted for surrender and cancelled options to purchase 3471211 shares of its class a common stock . the program , which was offered to both full and part-time employees , excluding most of the company 2019s executive officers , called for the grant ( at least six months and one day from the surrender date to employees still employed on that date ) of new options exercisable for two shares of class a common stock for every three shares of class a common stock issuable upon exercise of a surrendered option . no options were granted to any employees who participated in the exchange offer between the cancellation date and the new grant date . atc mexico holding stock option plan 2014the company maintains a stock option plan in its atc mexico subsidiary ( atc mexico plan ) . the atc mexico plan provides for the issuance of options to officers , employees , directors and consultants of atc mexico . the atc mexico plan limits the number of shares of common stock which may be granted to an aggregate of 360 shares , subject to adjustment based on changes in atc mexico 2019s capital structure . during 2002 , atc mexico granted options to purchase 318 shares of atc mexico common stock to officers and employees . such options were issued at one time with an exercise price of $ 10000 per share . the exercise price per share was at fair market value as determined by the board of directors with the assistance of an independent appraisal performed at the company 2019s request . the fair value of atc mexico plan options granted during 2002 were $ 3611 per share as determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . as described in note 10 , all outstanding options were exercised in march 2004 . no options under the atc mexico plan were granted in 2004 or 2003 , or exercised or cancelled in 2003 or 2002 , and no options were exercisable as of december 31 , 2003 or 2002 . ( see note 10. ) .
Question: what is the the weighted average fair values of the company 2019s options granted in 2003?
Answer: 6.32
Question: what about 2002?
Answer: 2.23
Question: what is the difference in weighted average fair values between these years?
Answer: 4.09
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 1.83408 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
projected payments relating to these liabilities for the next five years ending december 31 , 2012 and the period from 2013 to 2017 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 980</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>1185</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>978</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>1022</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>1425</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013 - 2017</td><td>$ 8147</td></tr></table> ( 18 ) concentration of risk the company generates a significant amount of revenue from large customers , however , no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenue or total segment revenue in the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 . financial instruments that potentially subject the company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents and trade receivables . the company places its cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions and , by policy , limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up the company 2019s customer base , thus spreading the trade receivables credit risk . the company controls credit risk through monitoring procedures . ( 19 ) segment information upon completion of the certegy merger , the company implemented a new organizational structure , which resulted in a new operating segment structure beginning with the reporting of first quarter 2006 results . effective as of february 1 , 2006 , the company 2019s operating segments are tps and lps . this structure reflects how the businesses are operated and managed . the primary components of the tps segment , which includes certegy 2019s card and check services , the financial institution processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis and the operations acquired from efunds , are enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international businesses . the primary components of the lps segment are mortgage information services businesses , which includes the mortgage lender processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis , and the former lender services , default management , and information services segments of fis . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what is the value of projected payments in 2009?
| 1185.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
projected payments relating to these liabilities for the next five years ending december 31 , 2012 and the period from 2013 to 2017 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 980</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>1185</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>978</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>1022</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>1425</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013 - 2017</td><td>$ 8147</td></tr></table> ( 18 ) concentration of risk the company generates a significant amount of revenue from large customers , however , no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenue or total segment revenue in the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 . financial instruments that potentially subject the company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents and trade receivables . the company places its cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions and , by policy , limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up the company 2019s customer base , thus spreading the trade receivables credit risk . the company controls credit risk through monitoring procedures . ( 19 ) segment information upon completion of the certegy merger , the company implemented a new organizational structure , which resulted in a new operating segment structure beginning with the reporting of first quarter 2006 results . effective as of february 1 , 2006 , the company 2019s operating segments are tps and lps . this structure reflects how the businesses are operated and managed . the primary components of the tps segment , which includes certegy 2019s card and check services , the financial institution processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis and the operations acquired from efunds , are enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international businesses . the primary components of the lps segment are mortgage information services businesses , which includes the mortgage lender processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis , and the former lender services , default management , and information services segments of fis . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what is the value of projected payments in 2009?
Answer: 1185.0
Question: what is the value in 2008?
| 980.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
projected payments relating to these liabilities for the next five years ending december 31 , 2012 and the period from 2013 to 2017 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 980</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>1185</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>978</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>1022</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>1425</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013 - 2017</td><td>$ 8147</td></tr></table> ( 18 ) concentration of risk the company generates a significant amount of revenue from large customers , however , no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenue or total segment revenue in the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 . financial instruments that potentially subject the company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents and trade receivables . the company places its cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions and , by policy , limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up the company 2019s customer base , thus spreading the trade receivables credit risk . the company controls credit risk through monitoring procedures . ( 19 ) segment information upon completion of the certegy merger , the company implemented a new organizational structure , which resulted in a new operating segment structure beginning with the reporting of first quarter 2006 results . effective as of february 1 , 2006 , the company 2019s operating segments are tps and lps . this structure reflects how the businesses are operated and managed . the primary components of the tps segment , which includes certegy 2019s card and check services , the financial institution processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis and the operations acquired from efunds , are enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international businesses . the primary components of the lps segment are mortgage information services businesses , which includes the mortgage lender processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis , and the former lender services , default management , and information services segments of fis . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what is the value of projected payments in 2009?
Answer: 1185.0
Question: what is the value in 2008?
Answer: 980.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
| 205.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
projected payments relating to these liabilities for the next five years ending december 31 , 2012 and the period from 2013 to 2017 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 980</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>1185</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>978</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>1022</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>1425</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013 - 2017</td><td>$ 8147</td></tr></table> ( 18 ) concentration of risk the company generates a significant amount of revenue from large customers , however , no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenue or total segment revenue in the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 . financial instruments that potentially subject the company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents and trade receivables . the company places its cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions and , by policy , limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up the company 2019s customer base , thus spreading the trade receivables credit risk . the company controls credit risk through monitoring procedures . ( 19 ) segment information upon completion of the certegy merger , the company implemented a new organizational structure , which resulted in a new operating segment structure beginning with the reporting of first quarter 2006 results . effective as of february 1 , 2006 , the company 2019s operating segments are tps and lps . this structure reflects how the businesses are operated and managed . the primary components of the tps segment , which includes certegy 2019s card and check services , the financial institution processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis and the operations acquired from efunds , are enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international businesses . the primary components of the lps segment are mortgage information services businesses , which includes the mortgage lender processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis , and the former lender services , default management , and information services segments of fis . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what is the value of projected payments in 2009?
Answer: 1185.0
Question: what is the value in 2008?
Answer: 980.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
Answer: 205.0
Question: what was the 2008 value?
| 980.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
projected payments relating to these liabilities for the next five years ending december 31 , 2012 and the period from 2013 to 2017 are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>$ 980</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>1185</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>978</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>1022</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>1425</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013 - 2017</td><td>$ 8147</td></tr></table> ( 18 ) concentration of risk the company generates a significant amount of revenue from large customers , however , no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenue or total segment revenue in the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 . financial instruments that potentially subject the company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents and trade receivables . the company places its cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions and , by policy , limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up the company 2019s customer base , thus spreading the trade receivables credit risk . the company controls credit risk through monitoring procedures . ( 19 ) segment information upon completion of the certegy merger , the company implemented a new organizational structure , which resulted in a new operating segment structure beginning with the reporting of first quarter 2006 results . effective as of february 1 , 2006 , the company 2019s operating segments are tps and lps . this structure reflects how the businesses are operated and managed . the primary components of the tps segment , which includes certegy 2019s card and check services , the financial institution processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis and the operations acquired from efunds , are enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international businesses . the primary components of the lps segment are mortgage information services businesses , which includes the mortgage lender processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis , and the former lender services , default management , and information services segments of fis . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what is the value of projected payments in 2009?
Answer: 1185.0
Question: what is the value in 2008?
Answer: 980.0
Question: what is the net change in value?
Answer: 205.0
Question: what was the 2008 value?
Answer: 980.0
Question: what was the percent change, or growth rate?
| 0.20918 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
hr solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 2111</td><td>$ 1267</td><td>$ 1356</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>234</td><td>203</td><td>208</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>16.0% ( 16.0 % )</td><td>15.3% ( 15.3 % )</td></tr></table> in october 2010 , we completed the acquisition of hewitt , one of the world 2019s leading human resource consulting and outsourcing companies . hewitt operates globally together with aon 2019s existing consulting and outsourcing operations under the newly created aon hewitt brand . hewitt 2019s operating results are included in aon 2019s results of operations beginning october 1 , 2010 . our hr solutions segment generated approximately 25% ( 25 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2010 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : consulting services : 2022 health and benefits advises clients about how to structure , fund , and administer employee benefit programs that attract , retain , and motivate employees . benefits consulting includes health and welfare , executive benefits , workforce strategies and productivity , absence management , benefits administration , data-driven health , compliance , employee commitment , investment advisory and elective benefits services . 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , investment consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration . 2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries . 2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management . outsourcing services : 2022 benefits outsourcing applies our hr expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services . our model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions . 2022 human resource business processing outsourcing ( 2018 2018hr bpo 2019 2019 ) provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and record and manage talent , workforce and other core hr process transactions as well as other complementary services such as absence management , flexible spending , dependent audit and participant advocacy . beginning in late 2008 , the disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets created significant uncertainty in the marketplace . weak economic conditions globally continued throughout 2010 . the prolonged economic downturn is adversely impacting our clients 2019 financial condition and therefore the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate . while we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and putting .
Question: what was the revenue in 2010?
| 2111.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
hr solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 2111</td><td>$ 1267</td><td>$ 1356</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>234</td><td>203</td><td>208</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>16.0% ( 16.0 % )</td><td>15.3% ( 15.3 % )</td></tr></table> in october 2010 , we completed the acquisition of hewitt , one of the world 2019s leading human resource consulting and outsourcing companies . hewitt operates globally together with aon 2019s existing consulting and outsourcing operations under the newly created aon hewitt brand . hewitt 2019s operating results are included in aon 2019s results of operations beginning october 1 , 2010 . our hr solutions segment generated approximately 25% ( 25 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2010 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : consulting services : 2022 health and benefits advises clients about how to structure , fund , and administer employee benefit programs that attract , retain , and motivate employees . benefits consulting includes health and welfare , executive benefits , workforce strategies and productivity , absence management , benefits administration , data-driven health , compliance , employee commitment , investment advisory and elective benefits services . 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , investment consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration . 2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries . 2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management . outsourcing services : 2022 benefits outsourcing applies our hr expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services . our model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions . 2022 human resource business processing outsourcing ( 2018 2018hr bpo 2019 2019 ) provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and record and manage talent , workforce and other core hr process transactions as well as other complementary services such as absence management , flexible spending , dependent audit and participant advocacy . beginning in late 2008 , the disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets created significant uncertainty in the marketplace . weak economic conditions globally continued throughout 2010 . the prolonged economic downturn is adversely impacting our clients 2019 financial condition and therefore the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate . while we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and putting .
Question: what was the revenue in 2010?
Answer: 2111.0
Question: and in 2009?
| 1267.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
hr solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 2111</td><td>$ 1267</td><td>$ 1356</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>234</td><td>203</td><td>208</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>16.0% ( 16.0 % )</td><td>15.3% ( 15.3 % )</td></tr></table> in october 2010 , we completed the acquisition of hewitt , one of the world 2019s leading human resource consulting and outsourcing companies . hewitt operates globally together with aon 2019s existing consulting and outsourcing operations under the newly created aon hewitt brand . hewitt 2019s operating results are included in aon 2019s results of operations beginning october 1 , 2010 . our hr solutions segment generated approximately 25% ( 25 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2010 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : consulting services : 2022 health and benefits advises clients about how to structure , fund , and administer employee benefit programs that attract , retain , and motivate employees . benefits consulting includes health and welfare , executive benefits , workforce strategies and productivity , absence management , benefits administration , data-driven health , compliance , employee commitment , investment advisory and elective benefits services . 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , investment consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration . 2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries . 2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management . outsourcing services : 2022 benefits outsourcing applies our hr expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services . our model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions . 2022 human resource business processing outsourcing ( 2018 2018hr bpo 2019 2019 ) provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and record and manage talent , workforce and other core hr process transactions as well as other complementary services such as absence management , flexible spending , dependent audit and participant advocacy . beginning in late 2008 , the disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets created significant uncertainty in the marketplace . weak economic conditions globally continued throughout 2010 . the prolonged economic downturn is adversely impacting our clients 2019 financial condition and therefore the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate . while we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and putting .
Question: what was the revenue in 2010?
Answer: 2111.0
Question: and in 2009?
Answer: 1267.0
Question: so how much did this value change between the two years?
| 844.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
hr solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 2111</td><td>$ 1267</td><td>$ 1356</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>234</td><td>203</td><td>208</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>16.0% ( 16.0 % )</td><td>15.3% ( 15.3 % )</td></tr></table> in october 2010 , we completed the acquisition of hewitt , one of the world 2019s leading human resource consulting and outsourcing companies . hewitt operates globally together with aon 2019s existing consulting and outsourcing operations under the newly created aon hewitt brand . hewitt 2019s operating results are included in aon 2019s results of operations beginning october 1 , 2010 . our hr solutions segment generated approximately 25% ( 25 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2010 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : consulting services : 2022 health and benefits advises clients about how to structure , fund , and administer employee benefit programs that attract , retain , and motivate employees . benefits consulting includes health and welfare , executive benefits , workforce strategies and productivity , absence management , benefits administration , data-driven health , compliance , employee commitment , investment advisory and elective benefits services . 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , investment consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration . 2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries . 2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management . outsourcing services : 2022 benefits outsourcing applies our hr expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services . our model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions . 2022 human resource business processing outsourcing ( 2018 2018hr bpo 2019 2019 ) provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and record and manage talent , workforce and other core hr process transactions as well as other complementary services such as absence management , flexible spending , dependent audit and participant advocacy . beginning in late 2008 , the disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets created significant uncertainty in the marketplace . weak economic conditions globally continued throughout 2010 . the prolonged economic downturn is adversely impacting our clients 2019 financial condition and therefore the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate . while we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and putting .
Question: what was the revenue in 2010?
Answer: 2111.0
Question: and in 2009?
Answer: 1267.0
Question: so how much did this value change between the two years?
Answer: 844.0
Question: and the specific value for 2009 again?
| 1267.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
hr solutions . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31,</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 2111</td><td>$ 1267</td><td>$ 1356</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>234</td><td>203</td><td>208</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margin</td><td>11.1% ( 11.1 % )</td><td>16.0% ( 16.0 % )</td><td>15.3% ( 15.3 % )</td></tr></table> in october 2010 , we completed the acquisition of hewitt , one of the world 2019s leading human resource consulting and outsourcing companies . hewitt operates globally together with aon 2019s existing consulting and outsourcing operations under the newly created aon hewitt brand . hewitt 2019s operating results are included in aon 2019s results of operations beginning october 1 , 2010 . our hr solutions segment generated approximately 25% ( 25 % ) of our consolidated total revenues in 2010 and provides a broad range of human capital services , as follows : consulting services : 2022 health and benefits advises clients about how to structure , fund , and administer employee benefit programs that attract , retain , and motivate employees . benefits consulting includes health and welfare , executive benefits , workforce strategies and productivity , absence management , benefits administration , data-driven health , compliance , employee commitment , investment advisory and elective benefits services . 2022 retirement specializes in global actuarial services , defined contribution consulting , investment consulting , tax and erisa consulting , and pension administration . 2022 compensation focuses on compensatory advisory/counsel including : compensation planning design , executive reward strategies , salary survey and benchmarking , market share studies and sales force effectiveness , with special expertise in the financial services and technology industries . 2022 strategic human capital delivers advice to complex global organizations on talent , change and organizational effectiveness issues , including talent strategy and acquisition , executive on-boarding , performance management , leadership assessment and development , communication strategy , workforce training and change management . outsourcing services : 2022 benefits outsourcing applies our hr expertise primarily through defined benefit ( pension ) , defined contribution ( 401 ( k ) ) , and health and welfare administrative services . our model replaces the resource-intensive processes once required to administer benefit plans with more efficient , effective , and less costly solutions . 2022 human resource business processing outsourcing ( 2018 2018hr bpo 2019 2019 ) provides market-leading solutions to manage employee data ; administer benefits , payroll and other human resources processes ; and record and manage talent , workforce and other core hr process transactions as well as other complementary services such as absence management , flexible spending , dependent audit and participant advocacy . beginning in late 2008 , the disruption in the global credit markets and the deterioration of the financial markets created significant uncertainty in the marketplace . weak economic conditions globally continued throughout 2010 . the prolonged economic downturn is adversely impacting our clients 2019 financial condition and therefore the levels of business activities in the industries and geographies where we operate . while we believe that the majority of our practices are well positioned to manage through this time , these challenges are reducing demand for some of our services and putting .
Question: what was the revenue in 2010?
Answer: 2111.0
Question: and in 2009?
Answer: 1267.0
Question: so how much did this value change between the two years?
Answer: 844.0
Question: and the specific value for 2009 again?
Answer: 1267.0
Question: so what was the percentage change?
| 0.66614 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
cash and a commitment to fund the capital needs of the business until such time as its cumulative funding is equal to funding that we have provided from inception through the effective date of the transaction . the transaction created a new joint venture which does business as comercia global payments brazil . as a result of the transaction , we deconsolidated global payments brazil , and we apply the equity method of accounting to our retained interest in comercia global payments brazil . we recorded a gain on the transaction of $ 2.1 million which is included in interest and other income in the consolidated statement of income for the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2014 . the results of the brazil operation from inception until the restructuring into a joint venture on september 30 , 2013 were not material to our consolidated results of operations , and the assets and liabilities that we derecognized were not material to our consolidated balance sheet . american express portfolio on october 24 , 2013 , we acquired a merchant portfolio in the czech republic from american express limited for $ 1.9 million . the acquired assets have been classified as customer-related intangible assets and contract-based intangible assets with estimated amortization periods of 10 years . paypros on march 4 , 2014 , we completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding stock of payment processing , inc . ( 201cpaypros 201d ) for $ 420.0 million in cash plus $ 7.7 million in cash for working capital , subject to adjustment based on a final determination of working capital . we funded the acquisition with a combination of cash on hand and proceeds from our new term loan . paypros , based in california , is a provider of fully-integrated payment solutions for small-to-medium sized merchants in the united states . paypros delivers its products and services through a network of technology-based enterprise software partners to vertical markets that are complementary to the markets served by accelerated payment technologies ( 201capt 201d ) , which we acquired in october 2012 . we acquired paypros to expand our direct distribution capabilities in the united states and to further enhance our existing integrated solutions offerings . this acquisition was recorded as a business combination , and the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values . due to the timing of this transaction , the allocation of the purchase price is preliminary pending final valuation of intangible assets and deferred income taxes as well as resolution of the working capital settlement discussed above . the purchase price of paypros was determined by analyzing the historical and prospective financial statements . acquisition costs associated with this purchase were not material . the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocation ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 271577</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer-related intangible assets</td><td>147500</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contract-based intangible assets</td><td>31000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired technology</td><td>10700</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fixed assets</td><td>1680</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets</td><td>4230</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>466687</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-38949 ( 38949 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 427738</td></tr></table> the preliminary purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill , included in the north america merchant services segment , of $ 271.6 million . such goodwill is attributable primarily to synergies with the services offered and markets served by paypros . the goodwill associated with the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets and the contract-based intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 13 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 7 years. .
Question: for the acquired technology segment, what was the expected annual amortization expense, in thousands?
| 1528.57143 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
cash and a commitment to fund the capital needs of the business until such time as its cumulative funding is equal to funding that we have provided from inception through the effective date of the transaction . the transaction created a new joint venture which does business as comercia global payments brazil . as a result of the transaction , we deconsolidated global payments brazil , and we apply the equity method of accounting to our retained interest in comercia global payments brazil . we recorded a gain on the transaction of $ 2.1 million which is included in interest and other income in the consolidated statement of income for the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2014 . the results of the brazil operation from inception until the restructuring into a joint venture on september 30 , 2013 were not material to our consolidated results of operations , and the assets and liabilities that we derecognized were not material to our consolidated balance sheet . american express portfolio on october 24 , 2013 , we acquired a merchant portfolio in the czech republic from american express limited for $ 1.9 million . the acquired assets have been classified as customer-related intangible assets and contract-based intangible assets with estimated amortization periods of 10 years . paypros on march 4 , 2014 , we completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding stock of payment processing , inc . ( 201cpaypros 201d ) for $ 420.0 million in cash plus $ 7.7 million in cash for working capital , subject to adjustment based on a final determination of working capital . we funded the acquisition with a combination of cash on hand and proceeds from our new term loan . paypros , based in california , is a provider of fully-integrated payment solutions for small-to-medium sized merchants in the united states . paypros delivers its products and services through a network of technology-based enterprise software partners to vertical markets that are complementary to the markets served by accelerated payment technologies ( 201capt 201d ) , which we acquired in october 2012 . we acquired paypros to expand our direct distribution capabilities in the united states and to further enhance our existing integrated solutions offerings . this acquisition was recorded as a business combination , and the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values . due to the timing of this transaction , the allocation of the purchase price is preliminary pending final valuation of intangible assets and deferred income taxes as well as resolution of the working capital settlement discussed above . the purchase price of paypros was determined by analyzing the historical and prospective financial statements . acquisition costs associated with this purchase were not material . the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocation ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 271577</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer-related intangible assets</td><td>147500</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contract-based intangible assets</td><td>31000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired technology</td><td>10700</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fixed assets</td><td>1680</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets</td><td>4230</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>466687</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-38949 ( 38949 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 427738</td></tr></table> the preliminary purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill , included in the north america merchant services segment , of $ 271.6 million . such goodwill is attributable primarily to synergies with the services offered and markets served by paypros . the goodwill associated with the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets and the contract-based intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 13 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 7 years. .
Question: for the acquired technology segment, what was the expected annual amortization expense, in thousands?
Answer: 1528.57143
Question: and what was the sum of this segment and the contract-based intangible assets one?
| 41700.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
cash and a commitment to fund the capital needs of the business until such time as its cumulative funding is equal to funding that we have provided from inception through the effective date of the transaction . the transaction created a new joint venture which does business as comercia global payments brazil . as a result of the transaction , we deconsolidated global payments brazil , and we apply the equity method of accounting to our retained interest in comercia global payments brazil . we recorded a gain on the transaction of $ 2.1 million which is included in interest and other income in the consolidated statement of income for the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2014 . the results of the brazil operation from inception until the restructuring into a joint venture on september 30 , 2013 were not material to our consolidated results of operations , and the assets and liabilities that we derecognized were not material to our consolidated balance sheet . american express portfolio on october 24 , 2013 , we acquired a merchant portfolio in the czech republic from american express limited for $ 1.9 million . the acquired assets have been classified as customer-related intangible assets and contract-based intangible assets with estimated amortization periods of 10 years . paypros on march 4 , 2014 , we completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding stock of payment processing , inc . ( 201cpaypros 201d ) for $ 420.0 million in cash plus $ 7.7 million in cash for working capital , subject to adjustment based on a final determination of working capital . we funded the acquisition with a combination of cash on hand and proceeds from our new term loan . paypros , based in california , is a provider of fully-integrated payment solutions for small-to-medium sized merchants in the united states . paypros delivers its products and services through a network of technology-based enterprise software partners to vertical markets that are complementary to the markets served by accelerated payment technologies ( 201capt 201d ) , which we acquired in october 2012 . we acquired paypros to expand our direct distribution capabilities in the united states and to further enhance our existing integrated solutions offerings . this acquisition was recorded as a business combination , and the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values . due to the timing of this transaction , the allocation of the purchase price is preliminary pending final valuation of intangible assets and deferred income taxes as well as resolution of the working capital settlement discussed above . the purchase price of paypros was determined by analyzing the historical and prospective financial statements . acquisition costs associated with this purchase were not material . the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocation ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 271577</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer-related intangible assets</td><td>147500</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contract-based intangible assets</td><td>31000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired technology</td><td>10700</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fixed assets</td><td>1680</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets</td><td>4230</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>466687</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-38949 ( 38949 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 427738</td></tr></table> the preliminary purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill , included in the north america merchant services segment , of $ 271.6 million . such goodwill is attributable primarily to synergies with the services offered and markets served by paypros . the goodwill associated with the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets and the contract-based intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 13 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 7 years. .
Question: for the acquired technology segment, what was the expected annual amortization expense, in thousands?
Answer: 1528.57143
Question: and what was the sum of this segment and the contract-based intangible assets one?
Answer: 41700.0
Question: including the customer-related intangible assets, what becomes this sum?
| 189200.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
cash and a commitment to fund the capital needs of the business until such time as its cumulative funding is equal to funding that we have provided from inception through the effective date of the transaction . the transaction created a new joint venture which does business as comercia global payments brazil . as a result of the transaction , we deconsolidated global payments brazil , and we apply the equity method of accounting to our retained interest in comercia global payments brazil . we recorded a gain on the transaction of $ 2.1 million which is included in interest and other income in the consolidated statement of income for the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2014 . the results of the brazil operation from inception until the restructuring into a joint venture on september 30 , 2013 were not material to our consolidated results of operations , and the assets and liabilities that we derecognized were not material to our consolidated balance sheet . american express portfolio on october 24 , 2013 , we acquired a merchant portfolio in the czech republic from american express limited for $ 1.9 million . the acquired assets have been classified as customer-related intangible assets and contract-based intangible assets with estimated amortization periods of 10 years . paypros on march 4 , 2014 , we completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding stock of payment processing , inc . ( 201cpaypros 201d ) for $ 420.0 million in cash plus $ 7.7 million in cash for working capital , subject to adjustment based on a final determination of working capital . we funded the acquisition with a combination of cash on hand and proceeds from our new term loan . paypros , based in california , is a provider of fully-integrated payment solutions for small-to-medium sized merchants in the united states . paypros delivers its products and services through a network of technology-based enterprise software partners to vertical markets that are complementary to the markets served by accelerated payment technologies ( 201capt 201d ) , which we acquired in october 2012 . we acquired paypros to expand our direct distribution capabilities in the united states and to further enhance our existing integrated solutions offerings . this acquisition was recorded as a business combination , and the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values . due to the timing of this transaction , the allocation of the purchase price is preliminary pending final valuation of intangible assets and deferred income taxes as well as resolution of the working capital settlement discussed above . the purchase price of paypros was determined by analyzing the historical and prospective financial statements . acquisition costs associated with this purchase were not material . the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocation ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 271577</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer-related intangible assets</td><td>147500</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contract-based intangible assets</td><td>31000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired technology</td><td>10700</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fixed assets</td><td>1680</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets</td><td>4230</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>466687</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-38949 ( 38949 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 427738</td></tr></table> the preliminary purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill , included in the north america merchant services segment , of $ 271.6 million . such goodwill is attributable primarily to synergies with the services offered and markets served by paypros . the goodwill associated with the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets and the contract-based intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 13 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 7 years. .
Question: for the acquired technology segment, what was the expected annual amortization expense, in thousands?
Answer: 1528.57143
Question: and what was the sum of this segment and the contract-based intangible assets one?
Answer: 41700.0
Question: including the customer-related intangible assets, what becomes this sum?
Answer: 189200.0
Question: and how much does this final sum represent in relation to the total assets acquired segment, in percentage?
| 0.40541 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the target awards for the other named executive officers were set as follows : joseph f . domino , ceo - entergy texas ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) ; hugh t . mcdonald , ceo - entergy arkansas ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) ; haley fisackerly , ceo - entergy mississippi ( 40% ( 40 % ) ) ; william m . mohl ( 60% ( 60 % ) ) , ceo - entergy gulf states and entergy louisiana ; charles l . rice , jr . ( 40% ( 40 % ) ) , ceo - entergy new orleans and theodore h . bunting , jr . - principal accounting officer - the subsidiaries ( 60% ( 60 % ) ) . the target awards for the named executive officers ( other than entergy named executive officers ) were set by their respective supervisors ( subject to ultimate approval of entergy 2019s chief executive officer ) who allocated a potential incentive pool established by the personnel committee among various of their direct and indirect reports . in setting the target awards , the supervisor took into account considerations similar to those used by the personnel committee in setting the target awards for entergy 2019s named executive officers . target awards are set based on an executive officer 2019s current position and executive management level within the entergy organization . executive management levels at entergy range from level 1 thorough level 4 . mr . denault and mr . taylor hold positions in level 2 whereas mr . bunting and mr . mohl hold positions in level 3 and mr . domino , mr . fisackerly , mr . mcdonald and mr . rice hold positions in level 4 . accordingly , their respective incentive targets differ one from another based on the external market data developed by the committee 2019s independent compensation consultant and the other factors noted above . in december 2010 , the committee determined the executive incentive plan targets to be used for purposes of establishing annual bonuses for 2011 . the committee 2019s determination of the target levels was made after full board review of management 2019s 2011 financial plan for entergy corporation , upon recommendation of the finance committee , and after the committee 2019s determination that the established targets aligned with entergy corporation 2019s anticipated 2011 financial performance as reflected in the financial plan . the targets established to measure management performance against as reported results were: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>minimum</td><td>target</td><td>maximum</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>earnings per share ( $ )</td><td>$ 6.10</td><td>$ 6.60</td><td>$ 7.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating cash flow ( $ in billions )</td><td>$ 2.97</td><td>$ 3.35</td><td>$ 3.70</td></tr></table> operating cash flow ( $ in billions ) in january 2012 , after reviewing earnings per share and operating cash flow results against the performance objectives in the above table , the committee determined that entergy corporation had exceeded as reported earnings per share target of $ 6.60 by $ 0.95 in 2011 while falling short of the operating cash flow goal of $ 3.35 billion by $ 221 million in 2011 . in accordance with the terms of the annual incentive plan , in january 2012 , the personnel committee certified the 2012 entergy achievement multiplier at 128% ( 128 % ) of target . under the terms of the management effectiveness program , the entergy achievement multiplier is automatically increased by 25 percent for the members of the office of the chief executive if the pre- established underlying performance goals established by the personnel committee are satisfied at the end of the performance period , subject to the personnel committee's discretion to adjust the automatic multiplier downward or eliminate it altogether . in accordance with section 162 ( m ) of the internal revenue code , the multiplier which entergy refers to as the management effectiveness factor is intended to provide the committee a mechanism to take into consideration specific achievement factors relating to the overall performance of entergy corporation . in january 2012 , the committee eliminated the management effectiveness factor with respect to the 2011 incentive awards , reflecting the personnel committee's determination that the entergy achievement multiplier , in and of itself without the management effectiveness factor , was consistent with the performance levels achieved by management . the annual incentive awards for the named executive officers ( other than mr . leonard , mr . denault and mr . taylor ) are awarded from an incentive pool approved by the committee . from this pool , each named executive officer 2019s supervisor determines the annual incentive payment based on the entergy achievement multiplier . the supervisor has the discretion to increase or decrease the multiple used to determine an incentive award based on individual and business unit performance . the incentive awards are subject to the ultimate approval of entergy 2019s chief executive officer. .
Question: in the year of 2011, by what amount did the operating cash flow fall short from the target one?
| 221.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the target awards for the other named executive officers were set as follows : joseph f . domino , ceo - entergy texas ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) ; hugh t . mcdonald , ceo - entergy arkansas ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) ; haley fisackerly , ceo - entergy mississippi ( 40% ( 40 % ) ) ; william m . mohl ( 60% ( 60 % ) ) , ceo - entergy gulf states and entergy louisiana ; charles l . rice , jr . ( 40% ( 40 % ) ) , ceo - entergy new orleans and theodore h . bunting , jr . - principal accounting officer - the subsidiaries ( 60% ( 60 % ) ) . the target awards for the named executive officers ( other than entergy named executive officers ) were set by their respective supervisors ( subject to ultimate approval of entergy 2019s chief executive officer ) who allocated a potential incentive pool established by the personnel committee among various of their direct and indirect reports . in setting the target awards , the supervisor took into account considerations similar to those used by the personnel committee in setting the target awards for entergy 2019s named executive officers . target awards are set based on an executive officer 2019s current position and executive management level within the entergy organization . executive management levels at entergy range from level 1 thorough level 4 . mr . denault and mr . taylor hold positions in level 2 whereas mr . bunting and mr . mohl hold positions in level 3 and mr . domino , mr . fisackerly , mr . mcdonald and mr . rice hold positions in level 4 . accordingly , their respective incentive targets differ one from another based on the external market data developed by the committee 2019s independent compensation consultant and the other factors noted above . in december 2010 , the committee determined the executive incentive plan targets to be used for purposes of establishing annual bonuses for 2011 . the committee 2019s determination of the target levels was made after full board review of management 2019s 2011 financial plan for entergy corporation , upon recommendation of the finance committee , and after the committee 2019s determination that the established targets aligned with entergy corporation 2019s anticipated 2011 financial performance as reflected in the financial plan . the targets established to measure management performance against as reported results were: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>minimum</td><td>target</td><td>maximum</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>earnings per share ( $ )</td><td>$ 6.10</td><td>$ 6.60</td><td>$ 7.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating cash flow ( $ in billions )</td><td>$ 2.97</td><td>$ 3.35</td><td>$ 3.70</td></tr></table> operating cash flow ( $ in billions ) in january 2012 , after reviewing earnings per share and operating cash flow results against the performance objectives in the above table , the committee determined that entergy corporation had exceeded as reported earnings per share target of $ 6.60 by $ 0.95 in 2011 while falling short of the operating cash flow goal of $ 3.35 billion by $ 221 million in 2011 . in accordance with the terms of the annual incentive plan , in january 2012 , the personnel committee certified the 2012 entergy achievement multiplier at 128% ( 128 % ) of target . under the terms of the management effectiveness program , the entergy achievement multiplier is automatically increased by 25 percent for the members of the office of the chief executive if the pre- established underlying performance goals established by the personnel committee are satisfied at the end of the performance period , subject to the personnel committee's discretion to adjust the automatic multiplier downward or eliminate it altogether . in accordance with section 162 ( m ) of the internal revenue code , the multiplier which entergy refers to as the management effectiveness factor is intended to provide the committee a mechanism to take into consideration specific achievement factors relating to the overall performance of entergy corporation . in january 2012 , the committee eliminated the management effectiveness factor with respect to the 2011 incentive awards , reflecting the personnel committee's determination that the entergy achievement multiplier , in and of itself without the management effectiveness factor , was consistent with the performance levels achieved by management . the annual incentive awards for the named executive officers ( other than mr . leonard , mr . denault and mr . taylor ) are awarded from an incentive pool approved by the committee . from this pool , each named executive officer 2019s supervisor determines the annual incentive payment based on the entergy achievement multiplier . the supervisor has the discretion to increase or decrease the multiple used to determine an incentive award based on individual and business unit performance . the incentive awards are subject to the ultimate approval of entergy 2019s chief executive officer. .
Question: in the year of 2011, by what amount did the operating cash flow fall short from the target one?
Answer: 221.0
Question: and what was that target cash flow?
| 3.35 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the target awards for the other named executive officers were set as follows : joseph f . domino , ceo - entergy texas ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) ; hugh t . mcdonald , ceo - entergy arkansas ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) ; haley fisackerly , ceo - entergy mississippi ( 40% ( 40 % ) ) ; william m . mohl ( 60% ( 60 % ) ) , ceo - entergy gulf states and entergy louisiana ; charles l . rice , jr . ( 40% ( 40 % ) ) , ceo - entergy new orleans and theodore h . bunting , jr . - principal accounting officer - the subsidiaries ( 60% ( 60 % ) ) . the target awards for the named executive officers ( other than entergy named executive officers ) were set by their respective supervisors ( subject to ultimate approval of entergy 2019s chief executive officer ) who allocated a potential incentive pool established by the personnel committee among various of their direct and indirect reports . in setting the target awards , the supervisor took into account considerations similar to those used by the personnel committee in setting the target awards for entergy 2019s named executive officers . target awards are set based on an executive officer 2019s current position and executive management level within the entergy organization . executive management levels at entergy range from level 1 thorough level 4 . mr . denault and mr . taylor hold positions in level 2 whereas mr . bunting and mr . mohl hold positions in level 3 and mr . domino , mr . fisackerly , mr . mcdonald and mr . rice hold positions in level 4 . accordingly , their respective incentive targets differ one from another based on the external market data developed by the committee 2019s independent compensation consultant and the other factors noted above . in december 2010 , the committee determined the executive incentive plan targets to be used for purposes of establishing annual bonuses for 2011 . the committee 2019s determination of the target levels was made after full board review of management 2019s 2011 financial plan for entergy corporation , upon recommendation of the finance committee , and after the committee 2019s determination that the established targets aligned with entergy corporation 2019s anticipated 2011 financial performance as reflected in the financial plan . the targets established to measure management performance against as reported results were: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>minimum</td><td>target</td><td>maximum</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>earnings per share ( $ )</td><td>$ 6.10</td><td>$ 6.60</td><td>$ 7.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating cash flow ( $ in billions )</td><td>$ 2.97</td><td>$ 3.35</td><td>$ 3.70</td></tr></table> operating cash flow ( $ in billions ) in january 2012 , after reviewing earnings per share and operating cash flow results against the performance objectives in the above table , the committee determined that entergy corporation had exceeded as reported earnings per share target of $ 6.60 by $ 0.95 in 2011 while falling short of the operating cash flow goal of $ 3.35 billion by $ 221 million in 2011 . in accordance with the terms of the annual incentive plan , in january 2012 , the personnel committee certified the 2012 entergy achievement multiplier at 128% ( 128 % ) of target . under the terms of the management effectiveness program , the entergy achievement multiplier is automatically increased by 25 percent for the members of the office of the chief executive if the pre- established underlying performance goals established by the personnel committee are satisfied at the end of the performance period , subject to the personnel committee's discretion to adjust the automatic multiplier downward or eliminate it altogether . in accordance with section 162 ( m ) of the internal revenue code , the multiplier which entergy refers to as the management effectiveness factor is intended to provide the committee a mechanism to take into consideration specific achievement factors relating to the overall performance of entergy corporation . in january 2012 , the committee eliminated the management effectiveness factor with respect to the 2011 incentive awards , reflecting the personnel committee's determination that the entergy achievement multiplier , in and of itself without the management effectiveness factor , was consistent with the performance levels achieved by management . the annual incentive awards for the named executive officers ( other than mr . leonard , mr . denault and mr . taylor ) are awarded from an incentive pool approved by the committee . from this pool , each named executive officer 2019s supervisor determines the annual incentive payment based on the entergy achievement multiplier . the supervisor has the discretion to increase or decrease the multiple used to determine an incentive award based on individual and business unit performance . the incentive awards are subject to the ultimate approval of entergy 2019s chief executive officer. .
Question: in the year of 2011, by what amount did the operating cash flow fall short from the target one?
Answer: 221.0
Question: and what was that target cash flow?
Answer: 3.35
Question: what percentage, then, did that amount represent in relation to it?
| 65.97015 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the target awards for the other named executive officers were set as follows : joseph f . domino , ceo - entergy texas ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) ; hugh t . mcdonald , ceo - entergy arkansas ( 50% ( 50 % ) ) ; haley fisackerly , ceo - entergy mississippi ( 40% ( 40 % ) ) ; william m . mohl ( 60% ( 60 % ) ) , ceo - entergy gulf states and entergy louisiana ; charles l . rice , jr . ( 40% ( 40 % ) ) , ceo - entergy new orleans and theodore h . bunting , jr . - principal accounting officer - the subsidiaries ( 60% ( 60 % ) ) . the target awards for the named executive officers ( other than entergy named executive officers ) were set by their respective supervisors ( subject to ultimate approval of entergy 2019s chief executive officer ) who allocated a potential incentive pool established by the personnel committee among various of their direct and indirect reports . in setting the target awards , the supervisor took into account considerations similar to those used by the personnel committee in setting the target awards for entergy 2019s named executive officers . target awards are set based on an executive officer 2019s current position and executive management level within the entergy organization . executive management levels at entergy range from level 1 thorough level 4 . mr . denault and mr . taylor hold positions in level 2 whereas mr . bunting and mr . mohl hold positions in level 3 and mr . domino , mr . fisackerly , mr . mcdonald and mr . rice hold positions in level 4 . accordingly , their respective incentive targets differ one from another based on the external market data developed by the committee 2019s independent compensation consultant and the other factors noted above . in december 2010 , the committee determined the executive incentive plan targets to be used for purposes of establishing annual bonuses for 2011 . the committee 2019s determination of the target levels was made after full board review of management 2019s 2011 financial plan for entergy corporation , upon recommendation of the finance committee , and after the committee 2019s determination that the established targets aligned with entergy corporation 2019s anticipated 2011 financial performance as reflected in the financial plan . the targets established to measure management performance against as reported results were: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>minimum</td><td>target</td><td>maximum</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>earnings per share ( $ )</td><td>$ 6.10</td><td>$ 6.60</td><td>$ 7.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating cash flow ( $ in billions )</td><td>$ 2.97</td><td>$ 3.35</td><td>$ 3.70</td></tr></table> operating cash flow ( $ in billions ) in january 2012 , after reviewing earnings per share and operating cash flow results against the performance objectives in the above table , the committee determined that entergy corporation had exceeded as reported earnings per share target of $ 6.60 by $ 0.95 in 2011 while falling short of the operating cash flow goal of $ 3.35 billion by $ 221 million in 2011 . in accordance with the terms of the annual incentive plan , in january 2012 , the personnel committee certified the 2012 entergy achievement multiplier at 128% ( 128 % ) of target . under the terms of the management effectiveness program , the entergy achievement multiplier is automatically increased by 25 percent for the members of the office of the chief executive if the pre- established underlying performance goals established by the personnel committee are satisfied at the end of the performance period , subject to the personnel committee's discretion to adjust the automatic multiplier downward or eliminate it altogether . in accordance with section 162 ( m ) of the internal revenue code , the multiplier which entergy refers to as the management effectiveness factor is intended to provide the committee a mechanism to take into consideration specific achievement factors relating to the overall performance of entergy corporation . in january 2012 , the committee eliminated the management effectiveness factor with respect to the 2011 incentive awards , reflecting the personnel committee's determination that the entergy achievement multiplier , in and of itself without the management effectiveness factor , was consistent with the performance levels achieved by management . the annual incentive awards for the named executive officers ( other than mr . leonard , mr . denault and mr . taylor ) are awarded from an incentive pool approved by the committee . from this pool , each named executive officer 2019s supervisor determines the annual incentive payment based on the entergy achievement multiplier . the supervisor has the discretion to increase or decrease the multiple used to determine an incentive award based on individual and business unit performance . the incentive awards are subject to the ultimate approval of entergy 2019s chief executive officer. .
Question: in the year of 2011, by what amount did the operating cash flow fall short from the target one?
Answer: 221.0
Question: and what was that target cash flow?
Answer: 3.35
Question: what percentage, then, did that amount represent in relation to it?
Answer: 65.97015
Question: and in that year, what can be concluded to have been the actual operating cash flow?
| 3.34978 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
in the fourth quarter of 2002 , aes lost voting control of one of the holding companies in the cemig ownership structure . this holding company indirectly owns the shares related to the cemig investment and indirectly holds the project financing debt related to cemig . as a result of the loss of voting control , aes stopped consolidating this holding company at december 31 , 2002 . other . during the fourth quarter of 2003 , the company sold its 25% ( 25 % ) ownership interest in medway power limited ( 2018 2018mpl 2019 2019 ) , a 688 mw natural gas-fired combined cycle facility located in the united kingdom , and aes medway operations limited ( 2018 2018aesmo 2019 2019 ) , the operating company for the facility , in an aggregate transaction valued at approximately a347 million ( $ 78 million ) . the sale resulted in a gain of $ 23 million which was recorded in continuing operations . mpl and aesmo were previously reported in the contract generation segment . in the second quarter of 2002 , the company sold its investment in empresa de infovias s.a . ( 2018 2018infovias 2019 2019 ) , a telecommunications company in brazil , for proceeds of $ 31 million to cemig , an affiliated company . the loss recorded on the sale was approximately $ 14 million and is recorded as a loss on sale of assets and asset impairment expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . in the second quarter of 2002 , the company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $ 40 million , after income taxes , on an equity method investment in a telecommunications company in latin america held by edc . the impairment charge resulted from sustained poor operating performance coupled with recent funding problems at the invested company . during 2001 , the company lost operational control of central electricity supply corporation ( 2018 2018cesco 2019 2019 ) , a distribution company located in the state of orissa , india . the state of orissa appointed an administrator to take operational control of cesco . cesco is accounted for as a cost method investment . aes 2019s investment in cesco is negative . in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas for approximately $ 40 million . the company acquired an additional 16.79% ( 16.79 % ) of songas for approximately $ 12.5 million , and the company began consolidating this entity in 2002 . songas owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania . in december 2002 , the company signed a sales purchase agreement to sell 100% ( 100 % ) of our ownership interest in songas . the sale of songas closed in april 2003 ( see note 4 for further discussion of the transaction ) . the following tables present summarized comparative financial information ( in millions ) of the entities in which the company has the ability to exercise significant influence but does not control and that are accounted for using the equity method. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of and for the years ended december 31,</td><td>2003</td><td>2002 ( 1 )</td><td>2001 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenues</td><td>$ 2758</td><td>$ 2832</td><td>$ 6147</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1039</td><td>695</td><td>1717</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income</td><td>407</td><td>229</td><td>650</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>current assets</td><td>1347</td><td>1097</td><td>3700</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>noncurrent assets</td><td>7479</td><td>6751</td><td>14942</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>1434</td><td>1418</td><td>3510</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>noncurrent liabilities</td><td>3795</td><td>3349</td><td>8297</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>stockholder's equity</td><td>3597</td><td>3081</td><td>6835</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes information pertaining to eletropaulo and light prior to february 2002 . in 2002 and 2001 , the results of operations and the financial position of cemig were negatively impacted by the devaluation of the brazilian real and the impairment charge recorded in 2002 . the brazilian real devalued 32% ( 32 % ) and 19% ( 19 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively. .
Question: what was the implied total value of medway power limited, based on the ownership stake sold and the deal value?
| 312.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
in the fourth quarter of 2002 , aes lost voting control of one of the holding companies in the cemig ownership structure . this holding company indirectly owns the shares related to the cemig investment and indirectly holds the project financing debt related to cemig . as a result of the loss of voting control , aes stopped consolidating this holding company at december 31 , 2002 . other . during the fourth quarter of 2003 , the company sold its 25% ( 25 % ) ownership interest in medway power limited ( 2018 2018mpl 2019 2019 ) , a 688 mw natural gas-fired combined cycle facility located in the united kingdom , and aes medway operations limited ( 2018 2018aesmo 2019 2019 ) , the operating company for the facility , in an aggregate transaction valued at approximately a347 million ( $ 78 million ) . the sale resulted in a gain of $ 23 million which was recorded in continuing operations . mpl and aesmo were previously reported in the contract generation segment . in the second quarter of 2002 , the company sold its investment in empresa de infovias s.a . ( 2018 2018infovias 2019 2019 ) , a telecommunications company in brazil , for proceeds of $ 31 million to cemig , an affiliated company . the loss recorded on the sale was approximately $ 14 million and is recorded as a loss on sale of assets and asset impairment expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . in the second quarter of 2002 , the company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $ 40 million , after income taxes , on an equity method investment in a telecommunications company in latin america held by edc . the impairment charge resulted from sustained poor operating performance coupled with recent funding problems at the invested company . during 2001 , the company lost operational control of central electricity supply corporation ( 2018 2018cesco 2019 2019 ) , a distribution company located in the state of orissa , india . the state of orissa appointed an administrator to take operational control of cesco . cesco is accounted for as a cost method investment . aes 2019s investment in cesco is negative . in august 2000 , a subsidiary of the company acquired a 49% ( 49 % ) interest in songas for approximately $ 40 million . the company acquired an additional 16.79% ( 16.79 % ) of songas for approximately $ 12.5 million , and the company began consolidating this entity in 2002 . songas owns the songo songo gas-to-electricity project in tanzania . in december 2002 , the company signed a sales purchase agreement to sell 100% ( 100 % ) of our ownership interest in songas . the sale of songas closed in april 2003 ( see note 4 for further discussion of the transaction ) . the following tables present summarized comparative financial information ( in millions ) of the entities in which the company has the ability to exercise significant influence but does not control and that are accounted for using the equity method. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of and for the years ended december 31,</td><td>2003</td><td>2002 ( 1 )</td><td>2001 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenues</td><td>$ 2758</td><td>$ 2832</td><td>$ 6147</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating income</td><td>1039</td><td>695</td><td>1717</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net income</td><td>407</td><td>229</td><td>650</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>current assets</td><td>1347</td><td>1097</td><td>3700</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>noncurrent assets</td><td>7479</td><td>6751</td><td>14942</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities</td><td>1434</td><td>1418</td><td>3510</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>noncurrent liabilities</td><td>3795</td><td>3349</td><td>8297</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>stockholder's equity</td><td>3597</td><td>3081</td><td>6835</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes information pertaining to eletropaulo and light prior to february 2002 . in 2002 and 2001 , the results of operations and the financial position of cemig were negatively impacted by the devaluation of the brazilian real and the impairment charge recorded in 2002 . the brazilian real devalued 32% ( 32 % ) and 19% ( 19 % ) for the years ended december 31 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively. .
Question: what was the implied total value of medway power limited, based on the ownership stake sold and the deal value?
Answer: 312.0
Question: converted to the hundred millions?
| 312000000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of options exercised ( i.e . the difference between the market price at exercise and the price paid by the employee to exercise the options ) during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 46.6 million , $ 99.2 million and $ 130.6 million , respectively , and the total amount of proceeds received by the company from exercise of these options during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 61.5 million , $ 122.6 million and $ 200.1 million , respectively . a summary of the company 2019s restricted stock unit award activity as of october 29 , 2016 and changes during the fiscal year then ended is presented below : restricted stock units outstanding ( in thousands ) weighted- average grant- date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>restrictedstock unitsoutstanding ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted-average grant-date fair valueper share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at october 31 2015</td><td>2698</td><td>$ 47.59</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>units granted</td><td>1099</td><td>$ 51.59</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>restrictions lapsed</td><td>-905 ( 905 )</td><td>$ 44.30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-202 ( 202 )</td><td>$ 50.34</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at october 29 2016</td><td>2690</td><td>$ 50.11</td></tr></table> as of october 29 , 2016 , there was $ 112.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share- based awards comprised of stock options and restricted stock units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted- average period of 1.4 years . the total grant-date fair value of shares that vested during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately $ 62.8 million , $ 65.6 million and $ 57.4 million , respectively . common stock repurchases the company 2019s common stock repurchase program has been in place since august 2004 . in the aggregate , the board of directors has authorized the company to repurchase $ 6.2 billion of the company 2019s common stock under the program . the company may repurchase outstanding shares of its common stock from time to time in the open market and through privately negotiated transactions . unless terminated earlier by resolution of the company 2019s board of directors , the repurchase program will expire when the company has repurchased all shares authorized under the program . as of october 29 , 2016 , the company had repurchased a total of approximately 147.0 million shares of its common stock for approximately $ 5.4 billion under this program . an additional $ 792.5 million remains available for repurchase of shares under the current authorized program . the repurchased shares are held as authorized but unissued shares of common stock . as a result of the company's planned acquisition of linear technology corporation , see note 6 , acquisitions , of these notes to consolidated financial statements , the company temporarily suspended the common stock repurchase plan in the third quarter of 2016 . the company also , from time to time , repurchases shares in settlement of employee minimum tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock units or the exercise of stock options . the withholding amount is based on the employees minimum statutory withholding requirement . any future common stock repurchases will be dependent upon several factors , including the company's financial performance , outlook , liquidity and the amount of cash the company has available in the united states . preferred stock the company has 471934 authorized shares of $ 1.00 par value preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . the board of directors is authorized to fix designations , relative rights , preferences and limitations on the preferred stock at the time of issuance. .
Question: what was the change in the total grant-date fair value of shares vested from 2015 to 2016?
| -2.8 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of options exercised ( i.e . the difference between the market price at exercise and the price paid by the employee to exercise the options ) during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 46.6 million , $ 99.2 million and $ 130.6 million , respectively , and the total amount of proceeds received by the company from exercise of these options during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 61.5 million , $ 122.6 million and $ 200.1 million , respectively . a summary of the company 2019s restricted stock unit award activity as of october 29 , 2016 and changes during the fiscal year then ended is presented below : restricted stock units outstanding ( in thousands ) weighted- average grant- date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>restrictedstock unitsoutstanding ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted-average grant-date fair valueper share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at october 31 2015</td><td>2698</td><td>$ 47.59</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>units granted</td><td>1099</td><td>$ 51.59</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>restrictions lapsed</td><td>-905 ( 905 )</td><td>$ 44.30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-202 ( 202 )</td><td>$ 50.34</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at october 29 2016</td><td>2690</td><td>$ 50.11</td></tr></table> as of october 29 , 2016 , there was $ 112.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share- based awards comprised of stock options and restricted stock units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted- average period of 1.4 years . the total grant-date fair value of shares that vested during fiscal 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately $ 62.8 million , $ 65.6 million and $ 57.4 million , respectively . common stock repurchases the company 2019s common stock repurchase program has been in place since august 2004 . in the aggregate , the board of directors has authorized the company to repurchase $ 6.2 billion of the company 2019s common stock under the program . the company may repurchase outstanding shares of its common stock from time to time in the open market and through privately negotiated transactions . unless terminated earlier by resolution of the company 2019s board of directors , the repurchase program will expire when the company has repurchased all shares authorized under the program . as of october 29 , 2016 , the company had repurchased a total of approximately 147.0 million shares of its common stock for approximately $ 5.4 billion under this program . an additional $ 792.5 million remains available for repurchase of shares under the current authorized program . the repurchased shares are held as authorized but unissued shares of common stock . as a result of the company's planned acquisition of linear technology corporation , see note 6 , acquisitions , of these notes to consolidated financial statements , the company temporarily suspended the common stock repurchase plan in the third quarter of 2016 . the company also , from time to time , repurchases shares in settlement of employee minimum tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock units or the exercise of stock options . the withholding amount is based on the employees minimum statutory withholding requirement . any future common stock repurchases will be dependent upon several factors , including the company's financial performance , outlook , liquidity and the amount of cash the company has available in the united states . preferred stock the company has 471934 authorized shares of $ 1.00 par value preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . the board of directors is authorized to fix designations , relative rights , preferences and limitations on the preferred stock at the time of issuance. .
Question: what was the change in the total grant-date fair value of shares vested from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: -2.8
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that fair value in 2015, in percentage?
| -0.04268 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during 2009 , we classified the atlantic star as held for sale and recognized a charge of $ 7.1 million to reduce the carrying value of the ship to its fair value less cost to sell based on a firm offer received during 2009 . this amount was recorded within other operating expenses in our consolidated statement of operations . we determined the fair market value of the atlantic star as of december 31 , 2010 based on comparable ship sales adjusted for the condition , age and size of the ship . we have categorized these inputs as level 3 because they are largely based on our own assump- tions . as of december 31 , 2010 , the carrying amount of the atlantic star which we still believe represents its fair value was $ 46.4 million . the following table presents a reconciliation of the company 2019s fuel call options 2019 beginning and ending balances as follows ( in thousands ) : fair value fair value measurements measurements using significant using significant unobservable unobservable year ended december 31 , 2010 inputs ( level 3 ) year ended december 31 , 2009 inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options fuel call options balance at january 1 , 2010 $ 9998 balance at january 1 , 2009 $ 2007 2007 2007 2007 2014 total gains or losses ( realized/ unrealized ) total gains or losses ( realized/ unrealized ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 2010 balance at january 1 2010</td><td>fairvalue measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options $ 9998</td><td>year ended december 31 2009 balance at january 1 2009</td><td>fairvalue measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options $ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total gains or losses ( realized /unrealized )</td><td>-</td><td>total gains or losses ( realized /unrealized )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>included in other income ( expense )</td><td>-2824 ( 2824 )</td><td>included in other income ( expense )</td><td>-2538 ( 2538 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements</td><td>24539</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements</td><td>12536</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transfers in and/or ( out ) of level 3</td><td>-31713 ( 31713 )</td><td>transfers in and/or ( out ) of level 3</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>balance at december 31 2009</td><td>$ 9998</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at thereporting date</td><td>$ -2824 ( 2824 )</td><td>the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held atthe reporting date</td><td>$ -2538 ( 2538 )</td></tr></table> the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 2824 ) the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 2538 ) during the fourth quarter of 2010 , we changed our valuation technique for fuel call options to a market approach method which employs inputs that are observable . the fair value for fuel call options is determined by using the prevailing market price for the instruments consisting of published price quotes for similar assets based on recent transactions in an active market . we believe that level 2 categorization is appropriate due to an increase in the observability and transparency of significant inputs . previously , we derived the fair value of our fuel call options using standard option pricing models with inputs based on the options 2019 contract terms and data either readily available or formulated from public market informa- tion . the fuel call options were categorized as level 3 because certain inputs , principally volatility , were unobservable . net transfers in and/or out of level 3 are reported as having occurred at the end of the quarter in which the transfer occurred ; therefore , gains or losses reflected in the table above for 2010 include fourth quarter fuel call option gains or losses . the reported fair values are based on a variety of factors and assumptions . accordingly , the fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instru- ments and long-lived assets that could have been realized as of december 31 , 2010 or december 31 , 2009 , or that will be realized in the future and do not include expenses that could be incurred in an actual sale or settlement . derivative instruments we are exposed to market risk attributable to changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices . we manage these risks through a combi- nation of our normal operating and financing activities and through the use of derivative financial instruments pursuant to our hedging practices and policies . the financial impact of these hedging instruments is pri- marily offset by corresponding changes in the under- lying exposures being hedged . we achieve this by closely matching the amount , term and conditions of the derivative instrument with the underlying risk being hedged . we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes . we monitor our derivative positions using techniques including market valuations and sensitivity analyses. .
Question: what was the value of purchase issuances and settlements at the end of 2010?
| 24539.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during 2009 , we classified the atlantic star as held for sale and recognized a charge of $ 7.1 million to reduce the carrying value of the ship to its fair value less cost to sell based on a firm offer received during 2009 . this amount was recorded within other operating expenses in our consolidated statement of operations . we determined the fair market value of the atlantic star as of december 31 , 2010 based on comparable ship sales adjusted for the condition , age and size of the ship . we have categorized these inputs as level 3 because they are largely based on our own assump- tions . as of december 31 , 2010 , the carrying amount of the atlantic star which we still believe represents its fair value was $ 46.4 million . the following table presents a reconciliation of the company 2019s fuel call options 2019 beginning and ending balances as follows ( in thousands ) : fair value fair value measurements measurements using significant using significant unobservable unobservable year ended december 31 , 2010 inputs ( level 3 ) year ended december 31 , 2009 inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options fuel call options balance at january 1 , 2010 $ 9998 balance at january 1 , 2009 $ 2007 2007 2007 2007 2014 total gains or losses ( realized/ unrealized ) total gains or losses ( realized/ unrealized ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 2010 balance at january 1 2010</td><td>fairvalue measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options $ 9998</td><td>year ended december 31 2009 balance at january 1 2009</td><td>fairvalue measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options $ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total gains or losses ( realized /unrealized )</td><td>-</td><td>total gains or losses ( realized /unrealized )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>included in other income ( expense )</td><td>-2824 ( 2824 )</td><td>included in other income ( expense )</td><td>-2538 ( 2538 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements</td><td>24539</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements</td><td>12536</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transfers in and/or ( out ) of level 3</td><td>-31713 ( 31713 )</td><td>transfers in and/or ( out ) of level 3</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>balance at december 31 2009</td><td>$ 9998</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at thereporting date</td><td>$ -2824 ( 2824 )</td><td>the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held atthe reporting date</td><td>$ -2538 ( 2538 )</td></tr></table> the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 2824 ) the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 2538 ) during the fourth quarter of 2010 , we changed our valuation technique for fuel call options to a market approach method which employs inputs that are observable . the fair value for fuel call options is determined by using the prevailing market price for the instruments consisting of published price quotes for similar assets based on recent transactions in an active market . we believe that level 2 categorization is appropriate due to an increase in the observability and transparency of significant inputs . previously , we derived the fair value of our fuel call options using standard option pricing models with inputs based on the options 2019 contract terms and data either readily available or formulated from public market informa- tion . the fuel call options were categorized as level 3 because certain inputs , principally volatility , were unobservable . net transfers in and/or out of level 3 are reported as having occurred at the end of the quarter in which the transfer occurred ; therefore , gains or losses reflected in the table above for 2010 include fourth quarter fuel call option gains or losses . the reported fair values are based on a variety of factors and assumptions . accordingly , the fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instru- ments and long-lived assets that could have been realized as of december 31 , 2010 or december 31 , 2009 , or that will be realized in the future and do not include expenses that could be incurred in an actual sale or settlement . derivative instruments we are exposed to market risk attributable to changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices . we manage these risks through a combi- nation of our normal operating and financing activities and through the use of derivative financial instruments pursuant to our hedging practices and policies . the financial impact of these hedging instruments is pri- marily offset by corresponding changes in the under- lying exposures being hedged . we achieve this by closely matching the amount , term and conditions of the derivative instrument with the underlying risk being hedged . we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes . we monitor our derivative positions using techniques including market valuations and sensitivity analyses. .
Question: what was the value of purchase issuances and settlements at the end of 2010?
Answer: 24539.0
Question: what was the value at the end of 2009?
| 12536.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during 2009 , we classified the atlantic star as held for sale and recognized a charge of $ 7.1 million to reduce the carrying value of the ship to its fair value less cost to sell based on a firm offer received during 2009 . this amount was recorded within other operating expenses in our consolidated statement of operations . we determined the fair market value of the atlantic star as of december 31 , 2010 based on comparable ship sales adjusted for the condition , age and size of the ship . we have categorized these inputs as level 3 because they are largely based on our own assump- tions . as of december 31 , 2010 , the carrying amount of the atlantic star which we still believe represents its fair value was $ 46.4 million . the following table presents a reconciliation of the company 2019s fuel call options 2019 beginning and ending balances as follows ( in thousands ) : fair value fair value measurements measurements using significant using significant unobservable unobservable year ended december 31 , 2010 inputs ( level 3 ) year ended december 31 , 2009 inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options fuel call options balance at january 1 , 2010 $ 9998 balance at january 1 , 2009 $ 2007 2007 2007 2007 2014 total gains or losses ( realized/ unrealized ) total gains or losses ( realized/ unrealized ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 2010 balance at january 1 2010</td><td>fairvalue measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options $ 9998</td><td>year ended december 31 2009 balance at january 1 2009</td><td>fairvalue measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options $ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total gains or losses ( realized /unrealized )</td><td>-</td><td>total gains or losses ( realized /unrealized )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>included in other income ( expense )</td><td>-2824 ( 2824 )</td><td>included in other income ( expense )</td><td>-2538 ( 2538 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements</td><td>24539</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements</td><td>12536</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transfers in and/or ( out ) of level 3</td><td>-31713 ( 31713 )</td><td>transfers in and/or ( out ) of level 3</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>balance at december 31 2009</td><td>$ 9998</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at thereporting date</td><td>$ -2824 ( 2824 )</td><td>the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held atthe reporting date</td><td>$ -2538 ( 2538 )</td></tr></table> the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 2824 ) the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 2538 ) during the fourth quarter of 2010 , we changed our valuation technique for fuel call options to a market approach method which employs inputs that are observable . the fair value for fuel call options is determined by using the prevailing market price for the instruments consisting of published price quotes for similar assets based on recent transactions in an active market . we believe that level 2 categorization is appropriate due to an increase in the observability and transparency of significant inputs . previously , we derived the fair value of our fuel call options using standard option pricing models with inputs based on the options 2019 contract terms and data either readily available or formulated from public market informa- tion . the fuel call options were categorized as level 3 because certain inputs , principally volatility , were unobservable . net transfers in and/or out of level 3 are reported as having occurred at the end of the quarter in which the transfer occurred ; therefore , gains or losses reflected in the table above for 2010 include fourth quarter fuel call option gains or losses . the reported fair values are based on a variety of factors and assumptions . accordingly , the fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instru- ments and long-lived assets that could have been realized as of december 31 , 2010 or december 31 , 2009 , or that will be realized in the future and do not include expenses that could be incurred in an actual sale or settlement . derivative instruments we are exposed to market risk attributable to changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices . we manage these risks through a combi- nation of our normal operating and financing activities and through the use of derivative financial instruments pursuant to our hedging practices and policies . the financial impact of these hedging instruments is pri- marily offset by corresponding changes in the under- lying exposures being hedged . we achieve this by closely matching the amount , term and conditions of the derivative instrument with the underlying risk being hedged . we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes . we monitor our derivative positions using techniques including market valuations and sensitivity analyses. .
Question: what was the value of purchase issuances and settlements at the end of 2010?
Answer: 24539.0
Question: what was the value at the end of 2009?
Answer: 12536.0
Question: what was the net change?
| 12003.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during 2009 , we classified the atlantic star as held for sale and recognized a charge of $ 7.1 million to reduce the carrying value of the ship to its fair value less cost to sell based on a firm offer received during 2009 . this amount was recorded within other operating expenses in our consolidated statement of operations . we determined the fair market value of the atlantic star as of december 31 , 2010 based on comparable ship sales adjusted for the condition , age and size of the ship . we have categorized these inputs as level 3 because they are largely based on our own assump- tions . as of december 31 , 2010 , the carrying amount of the atlantic star which we still believe represents its fair value was $ 46.4 million . the following table presents a reconciliation of the company 2019s fuel call options 2019 beginning and ending balances as follows ( in thousands ) : fair value fair value measurements measurements using significant using significant unobservable unobservable year ended december 31 , 2010 inputs ( level 3 ) year ended december 31 , 2009 inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options fuel call options balance at january 1 , 2010 $ 9998 balance at january 1 , 2009 $ 2007 2007 2007 2007 2014 total gains or losses ( realized/ unrealized ) total gains or losses ( realized/ unrealized ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 2010 balance at january 1 2010</td><td>fairvalue measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options $ 9998</td><td>year ended december 31 2009 balance at january 1 2009</td><td>fairvalue measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options $ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total gains or losses ( realized /unrealized )</td><td>-</td><td>total gains or losses ( realized /unrealized )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>included in other income ( expense )</td><td>-2824 ( 2824 )</td><td>included in other income ( expense )</td><td>-2538 ( 2538 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements</td><td>24539</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements</td><td>12536</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transfers in and/or ( out ) of level 3</td><td>-31713 ( 31713 )</td><td>transfers in and/or ( out ) of level 3</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>balance at december 31 2009</td><td>$ 9998</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at thereporting date</td><td>$ -2824 ( 2824 )</td><td>the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held atthe reporting date</td><td>$ -2538 ( 2538 )</td></tr></table> the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 2824 ) the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 2538 ) during the fourth quarter of 2010 , we changed our valuation technique for fuel call options to a market approach method which employs inputs that are observable . the fair value for fuel call options is determined by using the prevailing market price for the instruments consisting of published price quotes for similar assets based on recent transactions in an active market . we believe that level 2 categorization is appropriate due to an increase in the observability and transparency of significant inputs . previously , we derived the fair value of our fuel call options using standard option pricing models with inputs based on the options 2019 contract terms and data either readily available or formulated from public market informa- tion . the fuel call options were categorized as level 3 because certain inputs , principally volatility , were unobservable . net transfers in and/or out of level 3 are reported as having occurred at the end of the quarter in which the transfer occurred ; therefore , gains or losses reflected in the table above for 2010 include fourth quarter fuel call option gains or losses . the reported fair values are based on a variety of factors and assumptions . accordingly , the fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instru- ments and long-lived assets that could have been realized as of december 31 , 2010 or december 31 , 2009 , or that will be realized in the future and do not include expenses that could be incurred in an actual sale or settlement . derivative instruments we are exposed to market risk attributable to changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices . we manage these risks through a combi- nation of our normal operating and financing activities and through the use of derivative financial instruments pursuant to our hedging practices and policies . the financial impact of these hedging instruments is pri- marily offset by corresponding changes in the under- lying exposures being hedged . we achieve this by closely matching the amount , term and conditions of the derivative instrument with the underlying risk being hedged . we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes . we monitor our derivative positions using techniques including market valuations and sensitivity analyses. .
Question: what was the value of purchase issuances and settlements at the end of 2010?
Answer: 24539.0
Question: what was the value at the end of 2009?
Answer: 12536.0
Question: what was the net change?
Answer: 12003.0
Question: what was the 2009 value?
| 12536.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during 2009 , we classified the atlantic star as held for sale and recognized a charge of $ 7.1 million to reduce the carrying value of the ship to its fair value less cost to sell based on a firm offer received during 2009 . this amount was recorded within other operating expenses in our consolidated statement of operations . we determined the fair market value of the atlantic star as of december 31 , 2010 based on comparable ship sales adjusted for the condition , age and size of the ship . we have categorized these inputs as level 3 because they are largely based on our own assump- tions . as of december 31 , 2010 , the carrying amount of the atlantic star which we still believe represents its fair value was $ 46.4 million . the following table presents a reconciliation of the company 2019s fuel call options 2019 beginning and ending balances as follows ( in thousands ) : fair value fair value measurements measurements using significant using significant unobservable unobservable year ended december 31 , 2010 inputs ( level 3 ) year ended december 31 , 2009 inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options fuel call options balance at january 1 , 2010 $ 9998 balance at january 1 , 2009 $ 2007 2007 2007 2007 2014 total gains or losses ( realized/ unrealized ) total gains or losses ( realized/ unrealized ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 2010 balance at january 1 2010</td><td>fairvalue measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options $ 9998</td><td>year ended december 31 2009 balance at january 1 2009</td><td>fairvalue measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options $ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total gains or losses ( realized /unrealized )</td><td>-</td><td>total gains or losses ( realized /unrealized )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>included in other income ( expense )</td><td>-2824 ( 2824 )</td><td>included in other income ( expense )</td><td>-2538 ( 2538 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements</td><td>24539</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements</td><td>12536</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transfers in and/or ( out ) of level 3</td><td>-31713 ( 31713 )</td><td>transfers in and/or ( out ) of level 3</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>balance at december 31 2009</td><td>$ 9998</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at thereporting date</td><td>$ -2824 ( 2824 )</td><td>the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held atthe reporting date</td><td>$ -2538 ( 2538 )</td></tr></table> the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 2824 ) the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 2538 ) during the fourth quarter of 2010 , we changed our valuation technique for fuel call options to a market approach method which employs inputs that are observable . the fair value for fuel call options is determined by using the prevailing market price for the instruments consisting of published price quotes for similar assets based on recent transactions in an active market . we believe that level 2 categorization is appropriate due to an increase in the observability and transparency of significant inputs . previously , we derived the fair value of our fuel call options using standard option pricing models with inputs based on the options 2019 contract terms and data either readily available or formulated from public market informa- tion . the fuel call options were categorized as level 3 because certain inputs , principally volatility , were unobservable . net transfers in and/or out of level 3 are reported as having occurred at the end of the quarter in which the transfer occurred ; therefore , gains or losses reflected in the table above for 2010 include fourth quarter fuel call option gains or losses . the reported fair values are based on a variety of factors and assumptions . accordingly , the fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instru- ments and long-lived assets that could have been realized as of december 31 , 2010 or december 31 , 2009 , or that will be realized in the future and do not include expenses that could be incurred in an actual sale or settlement . derivative instruments we are exposed to market risk attributable to changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices . we manage these risks through a combi- nation of our normal operating and financing activities and through the use of derivative financial instruments pursuant to our hedging practices and policies . the financial impact of these hedging instruments is pri- marily offset by corresponding changes in the under- lying exposures being hedged . we achieve this by closely matching the amount , term and conditions of the derivative instrument with the underlying risk being hedged . we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes . we monitor our derivative positions using techniques including market valuations and sensitivity analyses. .
Question: what was the value of purchase issuances and settlements at the end of 2010?
Answer: 24539.0
Question: what was the value at the end of 2009?
Answer: 12536.0
Question: what was the net change?
Answer: 12003.0
Question: what was the 2009 value?
Answer: 12536.0
Question: what is the net change divided by the 2009 value?
| 0.95748 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during 2009 , we classified the atlantic star as held for sale and recognized a charge of $ 7.1 million to reduce the carrying value of the ship to its fair value less cost to sell based on a firm offer received during 2009 . this amount was recorded within other operating expenses in our consolidated statement of operations . we determined the fair market value of the atlantic star as of december 31 , 2010 based on comparable ship sales adjusted for the condition , age and size of the ship . we have categorized these inputs as level 3 because they are largely based on our own assump- tions . as of december 31 , 2010 , the carrying amount of the atlantic star which we still believe represents its fair value was $ 46.4 million . the following table presents a reconciliation of the company 2019s fuel call options 2019 beginning and ending balances as follows ( in thousands ) : fair value fair value measurements measurements using significant using significant unobservable unobservable year ended december 31 , 2010 inputs ( level 3 ) year ended december 31 , 2009 inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options fuel call options balance at january 1 , 2010 $ 9998 balance at january 1 , 2009 $ 2007 2007 2007 2007 2014 total gains or losses ( realized/ unrealized ) total gains or losses ( realized/ unrealized ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 2010 balance at january 1 2010</td><td>fairvalue measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options $ 9998</td><td>year ended december 31 2009 balance at january 1 2009</td><td>fairvalue measurements using significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) fuel call options $ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total gains or losses ( realized /unrealized )</td><td>-</td><td>total gains or losses ( realized /unrealized )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>included in other income ( expense )</td><td>-2824 ( 2824 )</td><td>included in other income ( expense )</td><td>-2538 ( 2538 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements</td><td>24539</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements</td><td>12536</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transfers in and/or ( out ) of level 3</td><td>-31713 ( 31713 )</td><td>transfers in and/or ( out ) of level 3</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2010</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>balance at december 31 2009</td><td>$ 9998</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at thereporting date</td><td>$ -2824 ( 2824 )</td><td>the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held atthe reporting date</td><td>$ -2538 ( 2538 )</td></tr></table> the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 2824 ) the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in other income ( expense ) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date $ ( 2538 ) during the fourth quarter of 2010 , we changed our valuation technique for fuel call options to a market approach method which employs inputs that are observable . the fair value for fuel call options is determined by using the prevailing market price for the instruments consisting of published price quotes for similar assets based on recent transactions in an active market . we believe that level 2 categorization is appropriate due to an increase in the observability and transparency of significant inputs . previously , we derived the fair value of our fuel call options using standard option pricing models with inputs based on the options 2019 contract terms and data either readily available or formulated from public market informa- tion . the fuel call options were categorized as level 3 because certain inputs , principally volatility , were unobservable . net transfers in and/or out of level 3 are reported as having occurred at the end of the quarter in which the transfer occurred ; therefore , gains or losses reflected in the table above for 2010 include fourth quarter fuel call option gains or losses . the reported fair values are based on a variety of factors and assumptions . accordingly , the fair values may not represent actual values of the financial instru- ments and long-lived assets that could have been realized as of december 31 , 2010 or december 31 , 2009 , or that will be realized in the future and do not include expenses that could be incurred in an actual sale or settlement . derivative instruments we are exposed to market risk attributable to changes in interest rates , foreign currency exchange rates and fuel prices . we manage these risks through a combi- nation of our normal operating and financing activities and through the use of derivative financial instruments pursuant to our hedging practices and policies . the financial impact of these hedging instruments is pri- marily offset by corresponding changes in the under- lying exposures being hedged . we achieve this by closely matching the amount , term and conditions of the derivative instrument with the underlying risk being hedged . we do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or other speculative purposes . we monitor our derivative positions using techniques including market valuations and sensitivity analyses. .
Question: what was the value of purchase issuances and settlements at the end of 2010?
Answer: 24539.0
Question: what was the value at the end of 2009?
Answer: 12536.0
Question: what was the net change?
Answer: 12003.0
Question: what was the 2009 value?
Answer: 12536.0
Question: what is the net change divided by the 2009 value?
Answer: 0.95748
Question: what is that number times 100?
| 95.74825 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
31 , 2015 , the price was r$ 218/mwh . after the expiration of contract with eletropaulo , tiet ea's strategy is to contract most of its physical guarantee , as described in regulatory framework section below , and sell the remaining portion in the spot market . tiet ea's strategy is reassessed from time to time according to changes in market conditions , hydrology and other factors . tiet ea has been continuously selling its available energy from 2016 forward through medium-term bilateral contracts of three to five years . as of december 31 , 2016 , tiet ea's contracted portfolio position is 95% ( 95 % ) and 88% ( 88 % ) with average prices of r$ 157/ mwh and r$ 159/mwh ( inflation adjusted until december 2016 ) for 2016 and 2017 , respectively . as brazil is mostly a hydro-based country with energy prices highly tied to the hydrological situation , the deterioration of the hydrology since the beginning of 2014 caused an increase in energy prices going forward . tiet ea is closely monitoring and analyzing system supply conditions to support energy commercialization decisions . under the concession agreement , tiet ea has an obligation to increase its capacity by 15% ( 15 % ) . tiet ea , as well as other concession generators , have not yet met this requirement due to regulatory , environmental , hydrological and fuel constraints . the state of s e3o paulo does not have a sufficient potential for wind power and only has a small remaining potential for hydro projects . as such , the capacity increases in the state will mostly be derived from thermal gas capacity projects . due to the highly complex process to obtain an environmental license for coal projects , tiet ea decided to fulfill its obligation with gas-fired projects in line with the federal government plans . petrobras refuses to supply natural gas and to offer capacity in its pipelines and regasification terminals . therefore , there are no regulations for natural gas swaps in place , and it is unfeasible to bring natural gas to aes tiet ea . a legal case has been initiated by the state of s e3o paulo requiring the investment to be performed . tiet ea is in the process of analyzing options to meet the obligation . uruguaiana is a 640 mw gas-fired combined cycle power plant located in the town of uruguaiana in the state of rio grande do sul , commissioned in december 2000 . aes manages and has a 46% ( 46 % ) economic interest in the plant with the remaining interest held by bndes . the plant's operations were suspended in april 2009 due to the unavailability of gas . aes has evaluated several alternatives to bring gas supply on a competitive basis to uruguaiana . one of the challenges is the capacity restrictions on the argentinean pipeline , especially during the winter season when gas demand in argentina is very high . the plant operated on a short-term basis during february and march 2013 , march through may 2014 , and february through may 2015 due to the short-term supply of lng for the facility . the plant did not operate in 2016 . uruguaiana continues to work toward securing gas on a long-term basis . market structure 2014 brazil has installed capacity of 150136 mw , which is 65% ( 65 % ) hydroelectric , 19% ( 19 % ) thermal and 16% ( 16 % ) renewable ( biomass and wind ) . brazil's national grid is divided into four subsystems . tiet ea is in the southeast and uruguaiana is in the south subsystems of the national grid . regulatory framework 2014 in brazil , the ministry of mines and energy determines the maximum amount of energy that a plant can sell , called physical guarantee , which represents the long-term average expected energy production of the plant . under current rules , physical guarantee can be sold to distribution companies through long- term regulated auctions or under unregulated bilateral contracts with large consumers or energy trading companies . the national system operator ( "ons" ) is responsible for coordinating and controlling the operation of the national grid . the ons dispatches generators based on hydrological conditions , reservoir levels , electricity demand and the prices of fuel and thermal generation . given the importance of hydro generation in the country , the ons sometimes reduces dispatch of hydro facilities and increases dispatch of thermal facilities to protect reservoir levels in the system . in brazil , the system operator controls all hydroelectric generation dispatch and reservoir levels . a mechanism known as the energy reallocation mechanism ( "mre" ) was created to share hydrological risk across mre hydro generators . if the hydro plants generate less than the total mre physical guarantee , the hydro generators may need to purchase energy in the short-term market to fulfill their contract obligations . when total hydro generation is higher than the total mre physical guarantee , the surplus is proportionally shared among its participants and they are able to make extra revenue selling the excess energy on the spot market . the consequences of unfavorable hydrology are ( i ) thermal plants more expensive to the system being dispatched , ( ii ) lower hydropower generation with deficits in the mre and ( iii ) high spot prices . aneel defines the spot price cap for electricity in the brazilian market . the spot price caps as defined by aneel and average spot prices by calendar year are as follows ( r$ / . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>spot price cap as defined by aneel</td><td>534</td><td>423</td><td>388</td><td>822</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average spot rate</td><td>-</td><td>94</td><td>287</td><td>689</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the average spot rate in 2015?
| 287.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
31 , 2015 , the price was r$ 218/mwh . after the expiration of contract with eletropaulo , tiet ea's strategy is to contract most of its physical guarantee , as described in regulatory framework section below , and sell the remaining portion in the spot market . tiet ea's strategy is reassessed from time to time according to changes in market conditions , hydrology and other factors . tiet ea has been continuously selling its available energy from 2016 forward through medium-term bilateral contracts of three to five years . as of december 31 , 2016 , tiet ea's contracted portfolio position is 95% ( 95 % ) and 88% ( 88 % ) with average prices of r$ 157/ mwh and r$ 159/mwh ( inflation adjusted until december 2016 ) for 2016 and 2017 , respectively . as brazil is mostly a hydro-based country with energy prices highly tied to the hydrological situation , the deterioration of the hydrology since the beginning of 2014 caused an increase in energy prices going forward . tiet ea is closely monitoring and analyzing system supply conditions to support energy commercialization decisions . under the concession agreement , tiet ea has an obligation to increase its capacity by 15% ( 15 % ) . tiet ea , as well as other concession generators , have not yet met this requirement due to regulatory , environmental , hydrological and fuel constraints . the state of s e3o paulo does not have a sufficient potential for wind power and only has a small remaining potential for hydro projects . as such , the capacity increases in the state will mostly be derived from thermal gas capacity projects . due to the highly complex process to obtain an environmental license for coal projects , tiet ea decided to fulfill its obligation with gas-fired projects in line with the federal government plans . petrobras refuses to supply natural gas and to offer capacity in its pipelines and regasification terminals . therefore , there are no regulations for natural gas swaps in place , and it is unfeasible to bring natural gas to aes tiet ea . a legal case has been initiated by the state of s e3o paulo requiring the investment to be performed . tiet ea is in the process of analyzing options to meet the obligation . uruguaiana is a 640 mw gas-fired combined cycle power plant located in the town of uruguaiana in the state of rio grande do sul , commissioned in december 2000 . aes manages and has a 46% ( 46 % ) economic interest in the plant with the remaining interest held by bndes . the plant's operations were suspended in april 2009 due to the unavailability of gas . aes has evaluated several alternatives to bring gas supply on a competitive basis to uruguaiana . one of the challenges is the capacity restrictions on the argentinean pipeline , especially during the winter season when gas demand in argentina is very high . the plant operated on a short-term basis during february and march 2013 , march through may 2014 , and february through may 2015 due to the short-term supply of lng for the facility . the plant did not operate in 2016 . uruguaiana continues to work toward securing gas on a long-term basis . market structure 2014 brazil has installed capacity of 150136 mw , which is 65% ( 65 % ) hydroelectric , 19% ( 19 % ) thermal and 16% ( 16 % ) renewable ( biomass and wind ) . brazil's national grid is divided into four subsystems . tiet ea is in the southeast and uruguaiana is in the south subsystems of the national grid . regulatory framework 2014 in brazil , the ministry of mines and energy determines the maximum amount of energy that a plant can sell , called physical guarantee , which represents the long-term average expected energy production of the plant . under current rules , physical guarantee can be sold to distribution companies through long- term regulated auctions or under unregulated bilateral contracts with large consumers or energy trading companies . the national system operator ( "ons" ) is responsible for coordinating and controlling the operation of the national grid . the ons dispatches generators based on hydrological conditions , reservoir levels , electricity demand and the prices of fuel and thermal generation . given the importance of hydro generation in the country , the ons sometimes reduces dispatch of hydro facilities and increases dispatch of thermal facilities to protect reservoir levels in the system . in brazil , the system operator controls all hydroelectric generation dispatch and reservoir levels . a mechanism known as the energy reallocation mechanism ( "mre" ) was created to share hydrological risk across mre hydro generators . if the hydro plants generate less than the total mre physical guarantee , the hydro generators may need to purchase energy in the short-term market to fulfill their contract obligations . when total hydro generation is higher than the total mre physical guarantee , the surplus is proportionally shared among its participants and they are able to make extra revenue selling the excess energy on the spot market . the consequences of unfavorable hydrology are ( i ) thermal plants more expensive to the system being dispatched , ( ii ) lower hydropower generation with deficits in the mre and ( iii ) high spot prices . aneel defines the spot price cap for electricity in the brazilian market . the spot price caps as defined by aneel and average spot prices by calendar year are as follows ( r$ / . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>spot price cap as defined by aneel</td><td>534</td><td>423</td><td>388</td><td>822</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average spot rate</td><td>-</td><td>94</td><td>287</td><td>689</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the average spot rate in 2015?
Answer: 287.0
Question: what about in 2014?
| 689.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
31 , 2015 , the price was r$ 218/mwh . after the expiration of contract with eletropaulo , tiet ea's strategy is to contract most of its physical guarantee , as described in regulatory framework section below , and sell the remaining portion in the spot market . tiet ea's strategy is reassessed from time to time according to changes in market conditions , hydrology and other factors . tiet ea has been continuously selling its available energy from 2016 forward through medium-term bilateral contracts of three to five years . as of december 31 , 2016 , tiet ea's contracted portfolio position is 95% ( 95 % ) and 88% ( 88 % ) with average prices of r$ 157/ mwh and r$ 159/mwh ( inflation adjusted until december 2016 ) for 2016 and 2017 , respectively . as brazil is mostly a hydro-based country with energy prices highly tied to the hydrological situation , the deterioration of the hydrology since the beginning of 2014 caused an increase in energy prices going forward . tiet ea is closely monitoring and analyzing system supply conditions to support energy commercialization decisions . under the concession agreement , tiet ea has an obligation to increase its capacity by 15% ( 15 % ) . tiet ea , as well as other concession generators , have not yet met this requirement due to regulatory , environmental , hydrological and fuel constraints . the state of s e3o paulo does not have a sufficient potential for wind power and only has a small remaining potential for hydro projects . as such , the capacity increases in the state will mostly be derived from thermal gas capacity projects . due to the highly complex process to obtain an environmental license for coal projects , tiet ea decided to fulfill its obligation with gas-fired projects in line with the federal government plans . petrobras refuses to supply natural gas and to offer capacity in its pipelines and regasification terminals . therefore , there are no regulations for natural gas swaps in place , and it is unfeasible to bring natural gas to aes tiet ea . a legal case has been initiated by the state of s e3o paulo requiring the investment to be performed . tiet ea is in the process of analyzing options to meet the obligation . uruguaiana is a 640 mw gas-fired combined cycle power plant located in the town of uruguaiana in the state of rio grande do sul , commissioned in december 2000 . aes manages and has a 46% ( 46 % ) economic interest in the plant with the remaining interest held by bndes . the plant's operations were suspended in april 2009 due to the unavailability of gas . aes has evaluated several alternatives to bring gas supply on a competitive basis to uruguaiana . one of the challenges is the capacity restrictions on the argentinean pipeline , especially during the winter season when gas demand in argentina is very high . the plant operated on a short-term basis during february and march 2013 , march through may 2014 , and february through may 2015 due to the short-term supply of lng for the facility . the plant did not operate in 2016 . uruguaiana continues to work toward securing gas on a long-term basis . market structure 2014 brazil has installed capacity of 150136 mw , which is 65% ( 65 % ) hydroelectric , 19% ( 19 % ) thermal and 16% ( 16 % ) renewable ( biomass and wind ) . brazil's national grid is divided into four subsystems . tiet ea is in the southeast and uruguaiana is in the south subsystems of the national grid . regulatory framework 2014 in brazil , the ministry of mines and energy determines the maximum amount of energy that a plant can sell , called physical guarantee , which represents the long-term average expected energy production of the plant . under current rules , physical guarantee can be sold to distribution companies through long- term regulated auctions or under unregulated bilateral contracts with large consumers or energy trading companies . the national system operator ( "ons" ) is responsible for coordinating and controlling the operation of the national grid . the ons dispatches generators based on hydrological conditions , reservoir levels , electricity demand and the prices of fuel and thermal generation . given the importance of hydro generation in the country , the ons sometimes reduces dispatch of hydro facilities and increases dispatch of thermal facilities to protect reservoir levels in the system . in brazil , the system operator controls all hydroelectric generation dispatch and reservoir levels . a mechanism known as the energy reallocation mechanism ( "mre" ) was created to share hydrological risk across mre hydro generators . if the hydro plants generate less than the total mre physical guarantee , the hydro generators may need to purchase energy in the short-term market to fulfill their contract obligations . when total hydro generation is higher than the total mre physical guarantee , the surplus is proportionally shared among its participants and they are able to make extra revenue selling the excess energy on the spot market . the consequences of unfavorable hydrology are ( i ) thermal plants more expensive to the system being dispatched , ( ii ) lower hydropower generation with deficits in the mre and ( iii ) high spot prices . aneel defines the spot price cap for electricity in the brazilian market . the spot price caps as defined by aneel and average spot prices by calendar year are as follows ( r$ / . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>spot price cap as defined by aneel</td><td>534</td><td>423</td><td>388</td><td>822</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average spot rate</td><td>-</td><td>94</td><td>287</td><td>689</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the average spot rate in 2015?
Answer: 287.0
Question: what about in 2014?
Answer: 689.0
Question: what is the net change?
| -402.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
31 , 2015 , the price was r$ 218/mwh . after the expiration of contract with eletropaulo , tiet ea's strategy is to contract most of its physical guarantee , as described in regulatory framework section below , and sell the remaining portion in the spot market . tiet ea's strategy is reassessed from time to time according to changes in market conditions , hydrology and other factors . tiet ea has been continuously selling its available energy from 2016 forward through medium-term bilateral contracts of three to five years . as of december 31 , 2016 , tiet ea's contracted portfolio position is 95% ( 95 % ) and 88% ( 88 % ) with average prices of r$ 157/ mwh and r$ 159/mwh ( inflation adjusted until december 2016 ) for 2016 and 2017 , respectively . as brazil is mostly a hydro-based country with energy prices highly tied to the hydrological situation , the deterioration of the hydrology since the beginning of 2014 caused an increase in energy prices going forward . tiet ea is closely monitoring and analyzing system supply conditions to support energy commercialization decisions . under the concession agreement , tiet ea has an obligation to increase its capacity by 15% ( 15 % ) . tiet ea , as well as other concession generators , have not yet met this requirement due to regulatory , environmental , hydrological and fuel constraints . the state of s e3o paulo does not have a sufficient potential for wind power and only has a small remaining potential for hydro projects . as such , the capacity increases in the state will mostly be derived from thermal gas capacity projects . due to the highly complex process to obtain an environmental license for coal projects , tiet ea decided to fulfill its obligation with gas-fired projects in line with the federal government plans . petrobras refuses to supply natural gas and to offer capacity in its pipelines and regasification terminals . therefore , there are no regulations for natural gas swaps in place , and it is unfeasible to bring natural gas to aes tiet ea . a legal case has been initiated by the state of s e3o paulo requiring the investment to be performed . tiet ea is in the process of analyzing options to meet the obligation . uruguaiana is a 640 mw gas-fired combined cycle power plant located in the town of uruguaiana in the state of rio grande do sul , commissioned in december 2000 . aes manages and has a 46% ( 46 % ) economic interest in the plant with the remaining interest held by bndes . the plant's operations were suspended in april 2009 due to the unavailability of gas . aes has evaluated several alternatives to bring gas supply on a competitive basis to uruguaiana . one of the challenges is the capacity restrictions on the argentinean pipeline , especially during the winter season when gas demand in argentina is very high . the plant operated on a short-term basis during february and march 2013 , march through may 2014 , and february through may 2015 due to the short-term supply of lng for the facility . the plant did not operate in 2016 . uruguaiana continues to work toward securing gas on a long-term basis . market structure 2014 brazil has installed capacity of 150136 mw , which is 65% ( 65 % ) hydroelectric , 19% ( 19 % ) thermal and 16% ( 16 % ) renewable ( biomass and wind ) . brazil's national grid is divided into four subsystems . tiet ea is in the southeast and uruguaiana is in the south subsystems of the national grid . regulatory framework 2014 in brazil , the ministry of mines and energy determines the maximum amount of energy that a plant can sell , called physical guarantee , which represents the long-term average expected energy production of the plant . under current rules , physical guarantee can be sold to distribution companies through long- term regulated auctions or under unregulated bilateral contracts with large consumers or energy trading companies . the national system operator ( "ons" ) is responsible for coordinating and controlling the operation of the national grid . the ons dispatches generators based on hydrological conditions , reservoir levels , electricity demand and the prices of fuel and thermal generation . given the importance of hydro generation in the country , the ons sometimes reduces dispatch of hydro facilities and increases dispatch of thermal facilities to protect reservoir levels in the system . in brazil , the system operator controls all hydroelectric generation dispatch and reservoir levels . a mechanism known as the energy reallocation mechanism ( "mre" ) was created to share hydrological risk across mre hydro generators . if the hydro plants generate less than the total mre physical guarantee , the hydro generators may need to purchase energy in the short-term market to fulfill their contract obligations . when total hydro generation is higher than the total mre physical guarantee , the surplus is proportionally shared among its participants and they are able to make extra revenue selling the excess energy on the spot market . the consequences of unfavorable hydrology are ( i ) thermal plants more expensive to the system being dispatched , ( ii ) lower hydropower generation with deficits in the mre and ( iii ) high spot prices . aneel defines the spot price cap for electricity in the brazilian market . the spot price caps as defined by aneel and average spot prices by calendar year are as follows ( r$ / . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>spot price cap as defined by aneel</td><td>534</td><td>423</td><td>388</td><td>822</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average spot rate</td><td>-</td><td>94</td><td>287</td><td>689</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the average spot rate in 2015?
Answer: 287.0
Question: what about in 2014?
Answer: 689.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -402.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| -0.58345 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
31 , 2015 , the price was r$ 218/mwh . after the expiration of contract with eletropaulo , tiet ea's strategy is to contract most of its physical guarantee , as described in regulatory framework section below , and sell the remaining portion in the spot market . tiet ea's strategy is reassessed from time to time according to changes in market conditions , hydrology and other factors . tiet ea has been continuously selling its available energy from 2016 forward through medium-term bilateral contracts of three to five years . as of december 31 , 2016 , tiet ea's contracted portfolio position is 95% ( 95 % ) and 88% ( 88 % ) with average prices of r$ 157/ mwh and r$ 159/mwh ( inflation adjusted until december 2016 ) for 2016 and 2017 , respectively . as brazil is mostly a hydro-based country with energy prices highly tied to the hydrological situation , the deterioration of the hydrology since the beginning of 2014 caused an increase in energy prices going forward . tiet ea is closely monitoring and analyzing system supply conditions to support energy commercialization decisions . under the concession agreement , tiet ea has an obligation to increase its capacity by 15% ( 15 % ) . tiet ea , as well as other concession generators , have not yet met this requirement due to regulatory , environmental , hydrological and fuel constraints . the state of s e3o paulo does not have a sufficient potential for wind power and only has a small remaining potential for hydro projects . as such , the capacity increases in the state will mostly be derived from thermal gas capacity projects . due to the highly complex process to obtain an environmental license for coal projects , tiet ea decided to fulfill its obligation with gas-fired projects in line with the federal government plans . petrobras refuses to supply natural gas and to offer capacity in its pipelines and regasification terminals . therefore , there are no regulations for natural gas swaps in place , and it is unfeasible to bring natural gas to aes tiet ea . a legal case has been initiated by the state of s e3o paulo requiring the investment to be performed . tiet ea is in the process of analyzing options to meet the obligation . uruguaiana is a 640 mw gas-fired combined cycle power plant located in the town of uruguaiana in the state of rio grande do sul , commissioned in december 2000 . aes manages and has a 46% ( 46 % ) economic interest in the plant with the remaining interest held by bndes . the plant's operations were suspended in april 2009 due to the unavailability of gas . aes has evaluated several alternatives to bring gas supply on a competitive basis to uruguaiana . one of the challenges is the capacity restrictions on the argentinean pipeline , especially during the winter season when gas demand in argentina is very high . the plant operated on a short-term basis during february and march 2013 , march through may 2014 , and february through may 2015 due to the short-term supply of lng for the facility . the plant did not operate in 2016 . uruguaiana continues to work toward securing gas on a long-term basis . market structure 2014 brazil has installed capacity of 150136 mw , which is 65% ( 65 % ) hydroelectric , 19% ( 19 % ) thermal and 16% ( 16 % ) renewable ( biomass and wind ) . brazil's national grid is divided into four subsystems . tiet ea is in the southeast and uruguaiana is in the south subsystems of the national grid . regulatory framework 2014 in brazil , the ministry of mines and energy determines the maximum amount of energy that a plant can sell , called physical guarantee , which represents the long-term average expected energy production of the plant . under current rules , physical guarantee can be sold to distribution companies through long- term regulated auctions or under unregulated bilateral contracts with large consumers or energy trading companies . the national system operator ( "ons" ) is responsible for coordinating and controlling the operation of the national grid . the ons dispatches generators based on hydrological conditions , reservoir levels , electricity demand and the prices of fuel and thermal generation . given the importance of hydro generation in the country , the ons sometimes reduces dispatch of hydro facilities and increases dispatch of thermal facilities to protect reservoir levels in the system . in brazil , the system operator controls all hydroelectric generation dispatch and reservoir levels . a mechanism known as the energy reallocation mechanism ( "mre" ) was created to share hydrological risk across mre hydro generators . if the hydro plants generate less than the total mre physical guarantee , the hydro generators may need to purchase energy in the short-term market to fulfill their contract obligations . when total hydro generation is higher than the total mre physical guarantee , the surplus is proportionally shared among its participants and they are able to make extra revenue selling the excess energy on the spot market . the consequences of unfavorable hydrology are ( i ) thermal plants more expensive to the system being dispatched , ( ii ) lower hydropower generation with deficits in the mre and ( iii ) high spot prices . aneel defines the spot price cap for electricity in the brazilian market . the spot price caps as defined by aneel and average spot prices by calendar year are as follows ( r$ / . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>spot price cap as defined by aneel</td><td>534</td><td>423</td><td>388</td><td>822</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average spot rate</td><td>-</td><td>94</td><td>287</td><td>689</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the average spot rate in 2015?
Answer: 287.0
Question: what about in 2014?
Answer: 689.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -402.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: -0.58345
Question: what about the net change from 2015 to 2016?
| -193.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
31 , 2015 , the price was r$ 218/mwh . after the expiration of contract with eletropaulo , tiet ea's strategy is to contract most of its physical guarantee , as described in regulatory framework section below , and sell the remaining portion in the spot market . tiet ea's strategy is reassessed from time to time according to changes in market conditions , hydrology and other factors . tiet ea has been continuously selling its available energy from 2016 forward through medium-term bilateral contracts of three to five years . as of december 31 , 2016 , tiet ea's contracted portfolio position is 95% ( 95 % ) and 88% ( 88 % ) with average prices of r$ 157/ mwh and r$ 159/mwh ( inflation adjusted until december 2016 ) for 2016 and 2017 , respectively . as brazil is mostly a hydro-based country with energy prices highly tied to the hydrological situation , the deterioration of the hydrology since the beginning of 2014 caused an increase in energy prices going forward . tiet ea is closely monitoring and analyzing system supply conditions to support energy commercialization decisions . under the concession agreement , tiet ea has an obligation to increase its capacity by 15% ( 15 % ) . tiet ea , as well as other concession generators , have not yet met this requirement due to regulatory , environmental , hydrological and fuel constraints . the state of s e3o paulo does not have a sufficient potential for wind power and only has a small remaining potential for hydro projects . as such , the capacity increases in the state will mostly be derived from thermal gas capacity projects . due to the highly complex process to obtain an environmental license for coal projects , tiet ea decided to fulfill its obligation with gas-fired projects in line with the federal government plans . petrobras refuses to supply natural gas and to offer capacity in its pipelines and regasification terminals . therefore , there are no regulations for natural gas swaps in place , and it is unfeasible to bring natural gas to aes tiet ea . a legal case has been initiated by the state of s e3o paulo requiring the investment to be performed . tiet ea is in the process of analyzing options to meet the obligation . uruguaiana is a 640 mw gas-fired combined cycle power plant located in the town of uruguaiana in the state of rio grande do sul , commissioned in december 2000 . aes manages and has a 46% ( 46 % ) economic interest in the plant with the remaining interest held by bndes . the plant's operations were suspended in april 2009 due to the unavailability of gas . aes has evaluated several alternatives to bring gas supply on a competitive basis to uruguaiana . one of the challenges is the capacity restrictions on the argentinean pipeline , especially during the winter season when gas demand in argentina is very high . the plant operated on a short-term basis during february and march 2013 , march through may 2014 , and february through may 2015 due to the short-term supply of lng for the facility . the plant did not operate in 2016 . uruguaiana continues to work toward securing gas on a long-term basis . market structure 2014 brazil has installed capacity of 150136 mw , which is 65% ( 65 % ) hydroelectric , 19% ( 19 % ) thermal and 16% ( 16 % ) renewable ( biomass and wind ) . brazil's national grid is divided into four subsystems . tiet ea is in the southeast and uruguaiana is in the south subsystems of the national grid . regulatory framework 2014 in brazil , the ministry of mines and energy determines the maximum amount of energy that a plant can sell , called physical guarantee , which represents the long-term average expected energy production of the plant . under current rules , physical guarantee can be sold to distribution companies through long- term regulated auctions or under unregulated bilateral contracts with large consumers or energy trading companies . the national system operator ( "ons" ) is responsible for coordinating and controlling the operation of the national grid . the ons dispatches generators based on hydrological conditions , reservoir levels , electricity demand and the prices of fuel and thermal generation . given the importance of hydro generation in the country , the ons sometimes reduces dispatch of hydro facilities and increases dispatch of thermal facilities to protect reservoir levels in the system . in brazil , the system operator controls all hydroelectric generation dispatch and reservoir levels . a mechanism known as the energy reallocation mechanism ( "mre" ) was created to share hydrological risk across mre hydro generators . if the hydro plants generate less than the total mre physical guarantee , the hydro generators may need to purchase energy in the short-term market to fulfill their contract obligations . when total hydro generation is higher than the total mre physical guarantee , the surplus is proportionally shared among its participants and they are able to make extra revenue selling the excess energy on the spot market . the consequences of unfavorable hydrology are ( i ) thermal plants more expensive to the system being dispatched , ( ii ) lower hydropower generation with deficits in the mre and ( iii ) high spot prices . aneel defines the spot price cap for electricity in the brazilian market . the spot price caps as defined by aneel and average spot prices by calendar year are as follows ( r$ / . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>spot price cap as defined by aneel</td><td>534</td><td>423</td><td>388</td><td>822</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average spot rate</td><td>-</td><td>94</td><td>287</td><td>689</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the average spot rate in 2015?
Answer: 287.0
Question: what about in 2014?
Answer: 689.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: -402.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
Answer: -0.58345
Question: what about the net change from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: -193.0
Question: what percentage change is from 2015 to 2016?
| -0.67247 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information our common stock has been traded on the new york stock exchange ( 2018 2018nyse 2019 2019 ) under the symbol 2018 2018exr 2019 2019 since our ipo on august 17 , 2004 . prior to that time there was no public market for our common stock . the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low bid price for our common stock as reported by the nyse and the per share dividends declared : dividends high low declared . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>high</td><td>low</td><td>dividends declared</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>period from august 17 2004 to september 30 2004</td><td>$ 14.38</td><td>$ 12.50</td><td>$ 0.1113</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended december 31 2004</td><td>14.55</td><td>12.60</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended march 31 2005</td><td>14.30</td><td>12.55</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended june 30 2005</td><td>14.75</td><td>12.19</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>quarter ended september 30 2005</td><td>16.71</td><td>14.32</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended december 31 2005</td><td>15.90</td><td>13.00</td><td>0.2275</td></tr></table> on february 28 , 2006 , the closing price of our common stock as reported by the nyse was $ 15.00 . at february 28 , 2006 , we had 166 holders of record of our common stock . holders of shares of common stock are entitled to receive distributions when declared by our board of directors out of any assets legally available for that purpose . as a reit , we are required to distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our 2018 2018reit taxable income 2019 2019 is generally equivalent to our net taxable ordinary income , determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid , to our stockholders annually in order to maintain our reit qualifications for u.s . federal income tax purposes . unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds on june 20 , 2005 , we completed the sale of 6200000 shares of our common stock , $ .01 par value , for $ 83514 , which we reported in a current report on form 8-k filed with the securities and exchange commission on june 24 , 2005 . we used the proceeds for general corporate purposes , including debt repayment . the shares were issued pursuant to an exemption from registration under the securities act of 1933 , as amended. .
Question: what was the dividends declared from 8/17/04 to 9/30/04?
| 0.2275 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information our common stock has been traded on the new york stock exchange ( 2018 2018nyse 2019 2019 ) under the symbol 2018 2018exr 2019 2019 since our ipo on august 17 , 2004 . prior to that time there was no public market for our common stock . the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low bid price for our common stock as reported by the nyse and the per share dividends declared : dividends high low declared . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>high</td><td>low</td><td>dividends declared</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>period from august 17 2004 to september 30 2004</td><td>$ 14.38</td><td>$ 12.50</td><td>$ 0.1113</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended december 31 2004</td><td>14.55</td><td>12.60</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended march 31 2005</td><td>14.30</td><td>12.55</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended june 30 2005</td><td>14.75</td><td>12.19</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>quarter ended september 30 2005</td><td>16.71</td><td>14.32</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended december 31 2005</td><td>15.90</td><td>13.00</td><td>0.2275</td></tr></table> on february 28 , 2006 , the closing price of our common stock as reported by the nyse was $ 15.00 . at february 28 , 2006 , we had 166 holders of record of our common stock . holders of shares of common stock are entitled to receive distributions when declared by our board of directors out of any assets legally available for that purpose . as a reit , we are required to distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our 2018 2018reit taxable income 2019 2019 is generally equivalent to our net taxable ordinary income , determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid , to our stockholders annually in order to maintain our reit qualifications for u.s . federal income tax purposes . unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds on june 20 , 2005 , we completed the sale of 6200000 shares of our common stock , $ .01 par value , for $ 83514 , which we reported in a current report on form 8-k filed with the securities and exchange commission on june 24 , 2005 . we used the proceeds for general corporate purposes , including debt repayment . the shares were issued pursuant to an exemption from registration under the securities act of 1933 , as amended. .
Question: what was the dividends declared from 8/17/04 to 9/30/04?
Answer: 0.2275
Question: and the yearly dividend declared?
| 0.91 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information our common stock has been traded on the new york stock exchange ( 2018 2018nyse 2019 2019 ) under the symbol 2018 2018exr 2019 2019 since our ipo on august 17 , 2004 . prior to that time there was no public market for our common stock . the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low bid price for our common stock as reported by the nyse and the per share dividends declared : dividends high low declared . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>high</td><td>low</td><td>dividends declared</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>period from august 17 2004 to september 30 2004</td><td>$ 14.38</td><td>$ 12.50</td><td>$ 0.1113</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended december 31 2004</td><td>14.55</td><td>12.60</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended march 31 2005</td><td>14.30</td><td>12.55</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended june 30 2005</td><td>14.75</td><td>12.19</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>quarter ended september 30 2005</td><td>16.71</td><td>14.32</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended december 31 2005</td><td>15.90</td><td>13.00</td><td>0.2275</td></tr></table> on february 28 , 2006 , the closing price of our common stock as reported by the nyse was $ 15.00 . at february 28 , 2006 , we had 166 holders of record of our common stock . holders of shares of common stock are entitled to receive distributions when declared by our board of directors out of any assets legally available for that purpose . as a reit , we are required to distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our 2018 2018reit taxable income 2019 2019 is generally equivalent to our net taxable ordinary income , determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid , to our stockholders annually in order to maintain our reit qualifications for u.s . federal income tax purposes . unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds on june 20 , 2005 , we completed the sale of 6200000 shares of our common stock , $ .01 par value , for $ 83514 , which we reported in a current report on form 8-k filed with the securities and exchange commission on june 24 , 2005 . we used the proceeds for general corporate purposes , including debt repayment . the shares were issued pursuant to an exemption from registration under the securities act of 1933 , as amended. .
Question: what was the dividends declared from 8/17/04 to 9/30/04?
Answer: 0.2275
Question: and the yearly dividend declared?
Answer: 0.91
Question: and the high for the quarter ended 3/31/05?
| 14.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information our common stock has been traded on the new york stock exchange ( 2018 2018nyse 2019 2019 ) under the symbol 2018 2018exr 2019 2019 since our ipo on august 17 , 2004 . prior to that time there was no public market for our common stock . the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low bid price for our common stock as reported by the nyse and the per share dividends declared : dividends high low declared . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>high</td><td>low</td><td>dividends declared</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>period from august 17 2004 to september 30 2004</td><td>$ 14.38</td><td>$ 12.50</td><td>$ 0.1113</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended december 31 2004</td><td>14.55</td><td>12.60</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended march 31 2005</td><td>14.30</td><td>12.55</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended june 30 2005</td><td>14.75</td><td>12.19</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>quarter ended september 30 2005</td><td>16.71</td><td>14.32</td><td>0.2275</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended december 31 2005</td><td>15.90</td><td>13.00</td><td>0.2275</td></tr></table> on february 28 , 2006 , the closing price of our common stock as reported by the nyse was $ 15.00 . at february 28 , 2006 , we had 166 holders of record of our common stock . holders of shares of common stock are entitled to receive distributions when declared by our board of directors out of any assets legally available for that purpose . as a reit , we are required to distribute at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our 2018 2018reit taxable income 2019 2019 is generally equivalent to our net taxable ordinary income , determined without regard to the deduction for dividends paid , to our stockholders annually in order to maintain our reit qualifications for u.s . federal income tax purposes . unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds on june 20 , 2005 , we completed the sale of 6200000 shares of our common stock , $ .01 par value , for $ 83514 , which we reported in a current report on form 8-k filed with the securities and exchange commission on june 24 , 2005 . we used the proceeds for general corporate purposes , including debt repayment . the shares were issued pursuant to an exemption from registration under the securities act of 1933 , as amended. .
Question: what was the dividends declared from 8/17/04 to 9/30/04?
Answer: 0.2275
Question: and the yearly dividend declared?
Answer: 0.91
Question: and the high for the quarter ended 3/31/05?
Answer: 14.3
Question: so what was the yearly dividend as a percentage of the quarterly high?
| 0.06364 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
zimmer biomet holdings , inc . 2015 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) interest to the date of redemption . in addition , the merger notes and the 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) senior notes due 2021 may be redeemed at our option without any make-whole premium at specified dates ranging from one month to six months in advance of the scheduled maturity date . between the closing date and june 30 , 2015 , we repaid the biomet senior notes we assumed in the merger . the fair value of the principal amount plus interest was $ 2798.6 million . these senior notes required us to pay a call premium in excess of the fair value of the notes when they were repaid . as a result , we recognized $ 22.0 million in non-operating other expense related to this call premium . the estimated fair value of our senior notes as of december 31 , 2015 , based on quoted prices for the specific securities from transactions in over-the-counter markets ( level 2 ) , was $ 8837.5 million . the estimated fair value of the japan term loan as of december 31 , 2015 , based upon publicly available market yield curves and the terms of the debt ( level 2 ) , was $ 96.4 million . the carrying value of the u.s . term loan approximates fair value as it bears interest at short-term variable market rates . we have entered into interest rate swap agreements which we designated as fair value hedges of underlying fixed- rate obligations on our senior notes due 2019 and 2021 . see note 14 for additional information regarding the interest rate swap agreements . we also have available uncommitted credit facilities totaling $ 35.8 million . at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , the weighted average interest rate for our long-term borrowings was 2.9 percent and 3.5 percent , respectively . we paid $ 207.1 million , $ 67.5 million and $ 68.1 million in interest during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . 13 . accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income oci refers to certain gains and losses that under gaap are included in comprehensive income but are excluded from net earnings as these amounts are initially recorded as an adjustment to stockholders 2019 equity . amounts in oci may be reclassified to net earnings upon the occurrence of certain events . our oci is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments , unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges , unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities , and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions on our defined benefit plans . foreign currency translation adjustments are reclassified to net earnings upon sale or upon a complete or substantially complete liquidation of an investment in a foreign entity . unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges are reclassified to net earnings when the hedged item affects net earnings . unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are reclassified to net earnings if we sell the security before maturity or if the unrealized loss is considered to be other-than-temporary . amounts related to defined benefit plans that are in oci are reclassified over the service periods of employees in the plan . the reclassification amounts are allocated to all employees in the plans and , therefore , the reclassified amounts may become part of inventory to the extent they are considered direct labor costs . see note 15 for more information on our defined benefit plans . the following table shows the changes in the components of oci , net of tax ( in millions ) : foreign currency translation hedges unrealized gains on securities defined benefit . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>cash flow hedges</td><td>unrealized gains on securities</td><td>defined benefit plan items</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance december 31 2014</td><td>$ 111.8</td><td>$ 70.1</td><td>$ -0.4 ( 0.4 )</td><td>$ -143.4 ( 143.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>oci before reclassifications</td><td>-305.2 ( 305.2 )</td><td>52.7</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td><td>-30.6 ( 30.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassifications</td><td>2013</td><td>-93.0 ( 93.0 )</td><td>2013</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance december 31 2015</td><td>$ -193.4 ( 193.4 )</td><td>$ 29.8</td><td>$ -0.6 ( 0.6 )</td><td>$ -164.8 ( 164.8 )</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the balance of cash flow hedges at the end of 2015?
| 29.8 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
zimmer biomet holdings , inc . 2015 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) interest to the date of redemption . in addition , the merger notes and the 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) senior notes due 2021 may be redeemed at our option without any make-whole premium at specified dates ranging from one month to six months in advance of the scheduled maturity date . between the closing date and june 30 , 2015 , we repaid the biomet senior notes we assumed in the merger . the fair value of the principal amount plus interest was $ 2798.6 million . these senior notes required us to pay a call premium in excess of the fair value of the notes when they were repaid . as a result , we recognized $ 22.0 million in non-operating other expense related to this call premium . the estimated fair value of our senior notes as of december 31 , 2015 , based on quoted prices for the specific securities from transactions in over-the-counter markets ( level 2 ) , was $ 8837.5 million . the estimated fair value of the japan term loan as of december 31 , 2015 , based upon publicly available market yield curves and the terms of the debt ( level 2 ) , was $ 96.4 million . the carrying value of the u.s . term loan approximates fair value as it bears interest at short-term variable market rates . we have entered into interest rate swap agreements which we designated as fair value hedges of underlying fixed- rate obligations on our senior notes due 2019 and 2021 . see note 14 for additional information regarding the interest rate swap agreements . we also have available uncommitted credit facilities totaling $ 35.8 million . at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , the weighted average interest rate for our long-term borrowings was 2.9 percent and 3.5 percent , respectively . we paid $ 207.1 million , $ 67.5 million and $ 68.1 million in interest during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . 13 . accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income oci refers to certain gains and losses that under gaap are included in comprehensive income but are excluded from net earnings as these amounts are initially recorded as an adjustment to stockholders 2019 equity . amounts in oci may be reclassified to net earnings upon the occurrence of certain events . our oci is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments , unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges , unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities , and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions on our defined benefit plans . foreign currency translation adjustments are reclassified to net earnings upon sale or upon a complete or substantially complete liquidation of an investment in a foreign entity . unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges are reclassified to net earnings when the hedged item affects net earnings . unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are reclassified to net earnings if we sell the security before maturity or if the unrealized loss is considered to be other-than-temporary . amounts related to defined benefit plans that are in oci are reclassified over the service periods of employees in the plan . the reclassification amounts are allocated to all employees in the plans and , therefore , the reclassified amounts may become part of inventory to the extent they are considered direct labor costs . see note 15 for more information on our defined benefit plans . the following table shows the changes in the components of oci , net of tax ( in millions ) : foreign currency translation hedges unrealized gains on securities defined benefit . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>cash flow hedges</td><td>unrealized gains on securities</td><td>defined benefit plan items</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance december 31 2014</td><td>$ 111.8</td><td>$ 70.1</td><td>$ -0.4 ( 0.4 )</td><td>$ -143.4 ( 143.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>oci before reclassifications</td><td>-305.2 ( 305.2 )</td><td>52.7</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td><td>-30.6 ( 30.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassifications</td><td>2013</td><td>-93.0 ( 93.0 )</td><td>2013</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance december 31 2015</td><td>$ -193.4 ( 193.4 )</td><td>$ 29.8</td><td>$ -0.6 ( 0.6 )</td><td>$ -164.8 ( 164.8 )</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the balance of cash flow hedges at the end of 2015?
Answer: 29.8
Question: what about the balance of foreign currency translation?
| -193.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
zimmer biomet holdings , inc . 2015 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) interest to the date of redemption . in addition , the merger notes and the 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) senior notes due 2021 may be redeemed at our option without any make-whole premium at specified dates ranging from one month to six months in advance of the scheduled maturity date . between the closing date and june 30 , 2015 , we repaid the biomet senior notes we assumed in the merger . the fair value of the principal amount plus interest was $ 2798.6 million . these senior notes required us to pay a call premium in excess of the fair value of the notes when they were repaid . as a result , we recognized $ 22.0 million in non-operating other expense related to this call premium . the estimated fair value of our senior notes as of december 31 , 2015 , based on quoted prices for the specific securities from transactions in over-the-counter markets ( level 2 ) , was $ 8837.5 million . the estimated fair value of the japan term loan as of december 31 , 2015 , based upon publicly available market yield curves and the terms of the debt ( level 2 ) , was $ 96.4 million . the carrying value of the u.s . term loan approximates fair value as it bears interest at short-term variable market rates . we have entered into interest rate swap agreements which we designated as fair value hedges of underlying fixed- rate obligations on our senior notes due 2019 and 2021 . see note 14 for additional information regarding the interest rate swap agreements . we also have available uncommitted credit facilities totaling $ 35.8 million . at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , the weighted average interest rate for our long-term borrowings was 2.9 percent and 3.5 percent , respectively . we paid $ 207.1 million , $ 67.5 million and $ 68.1 million in interest during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . 13 . accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income oci refers to certain gains and losses that under gaap are included in comprehensive income but are excluded from net earnings as these amounts are initially recorded as an adjustment to stockholders 2019 equity . amounts in oci may be reclassified to net earnings upon the occurrence of certain events . our oci is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments , unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges , unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities , and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions on our defined benefit plans . foreign currency translation adjustments are reclassified to net earnings upon sale or upon a complete or substantially complete liquidation of an investment in a foreign entity . unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges are reclassified to net earnings when the hedged item affects net earnings . unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are reclassified to net earnings if we sell the security before maturity or if the unrealized loss is considered to be other-than-temporary . amounts related to defined benefit plans that are in oci are reclassified over the service periods of employees in the plan . the reclassification amounts are allocated to all employees in the plans and , therefore , the reclassified amounts may become part of inventory to the extent they are considered direct labor costs . see note 15 for more information on our defined benefit plans . the following table shows the changes in the components of oci , net of tax ( in millions ) : foreign currency translation hedges unrealized gains on securities defined benefit . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>cash flow hedges</td><td>unrealized gains on securities</td><td>defined benefit plan items</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance december 31 2014</td><td>$ 111.8</td><td>$ 70.1</td><td>$ -0.4 ( 0.4 )</td><td>$ -143.4 ( 143.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>oci before reclassifications</td><td>-305.2 ( 305.2 )</td><td>52.7</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td><td>-30.6 ( 30.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassifications</td><td>2013</td><td>-93.0 ( 93.0 )</td><td>2013</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance december 31 2015</td><td>$ -193.4 ( 193.4 )</td><td>$ 29.8</td><td>$ -0.6 ( 0.6 )</td><td>$ -164.8 ( 164.8 )</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the balance of cash flow hedges at the end of 2015?
Answer: 29.8
Question: what about the balance of foreign currency translation?
Answer: -193.4
Question: what is the sum of these two elements?
| -163.6 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
zimmer biomet holdings , inc . 2015 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) interest to the date of redemption . in addition , the merger notes and the 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) senior notes due 2021 may be redeemed at our option without any make-whole premium at specified dates ranging from one month to six months in advance of the scheduled maturity date . between the closing date and june 30 , 2015 , we repaid the biomet senior notes we assumed in the merger . the fair value of the principal amount plus interest was $ 2798.6 million . these senior notes required us to pay a call premium in excess of the fair value of the notes when they were repaid . as a result , we recognized $ 22.0 million in non-operating other expense related to this call premium . the estimated fair value of our senior notes as of december 31 , 2015 , based on quoted prices for the specific securities from transactions in over-the-counter markets ( level 2 ) , was $ 8837.5 million . the estimated fair value of the japan term loan as of december 31 , 2015 , based upon publicly available market yield curves and the terms of the debt ( level 2 ) , was $ 96.4 million . the carrying value of the u.s . term loan approximates fair value as it bears interest at short-term variable market rates . we have entered into interest rate swap agreements which we designated as fair value hedges of underlying fixed- rate obligations on our senior notes due 2019 and 2021 . see note 14 for additional information regarding the interest rate swap agreements . we also have available uncommitted credit facilities totaling $ 35.8 million . at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , the weighted average interest rate for our long-term borrowings was 2.9 percent and 3.5 percent , respectively . we paid $ 207.1 million , $ 67.5 million and $ 68.1 million in interest during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . 13 . accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income oci refers to certain gains and losses that under gaap are included in comprehensive income but are excluded from net earnings as these amounts are initially recorded as an adjustment to stockholders 2019 equity . amounts in oci may be reclassified to net earnings upon the occurrence of certain events . our oci is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments , unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges , unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities , and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions on our defined benefit plans . foreign currency translation adjustments are reclassified to net earnings upon sale or upon a complete or substantially complete liquidation of an investment in a foreign entity . unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges are reclassified to net earnings when the hedged item affects net earnings . unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are reclassified to net earnings if we sell the security before maturity or if the unrealized loss is considered to be other-than-temporary . amounts related to defined benefit plans that are in oci are reclassified over the service periods of employees in the plan . the reclassification amounts are allocated to all employees in the plans and , therefore , the reclassified amounts may become part of inventory to the extent they are considered direct labor costs . see note 15 for more information on our defined benefit plans . the following table shows the changes in the components of oci , net of tax ( in millions ) : foreign currency translation hedges unrealized gains on securities defined benefit . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>cash flow hedges</td><td>unrealized gains on securities</td><td>defined benefit plan items</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance december 31 2014</td><td>$ 111.8</td><td>$ 70.1</td><td>$ -0.4 ( 0.4 )</td><td>$ -143.4 ( 143.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>oci before reclassifications</td><td>-305.2 ( 305.2 )</td><td>52.7</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td><td>-30.6 ( 30.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassifications</td><td>2013</td><td>-93.0 ( 93.0 )</td><td>2013</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance december 31 2015</td><td>$ -193.4 ( 193.4 )</td><td>$ 29.8</td><td>$ -0.6 ( 0.6 )</td><td>$ -164.8 ( 164.8 )</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the balance of cash flow hedges at the end of 2015?
Answer: 29.8
Question: what about the balance of foreign currency translation?
Answer: -193.4
Question: what is the sum of these two elements?
Answer: -163.6
Question: what about the sum of the balance of unrealized gains on securities is added?
| -164.2 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
zimmer biomet holdings , inc . 2015 form 10-k annual report notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) interest to the date of redemption . in addition , the merger notes and the 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) senior notes due 2021 may be redeemed at our option without any make-whole premium at specified dates ranging from one month to six months in advance of the scheduled maturity date . between the closing date and june 30 , 2015 , we repaid the biomet senior notes we assumed in the merger . the fair value of the principal amount plus interest was $ 2798.6 million . these senior notes required us to pay a call premium in excess of the fair value of the notes when they were repaid . as a result , we recognized $ 22.0 million in non-operating other expense related to this call premium . the estimated fair value of our senior notes as of december 31 , 2015 , based on quoted prices for the specific securities from transactions in over-the-counter markets ( level 2 ) , was $ 8837.5 million . the estimated fair value of the japan term loan as of december 31 , 2015 , based upon publicly available market yield curves and the terms of the debt ( level 2 ) , was $ 96.4 million . the carrying value of the u.s . term loan approximates fair value as it bears interest at short-term variable market rates . we have entered into interest rate swap agreements which we designated as fair value hedges of underlying fixed- rate obligations on our senior notes due 2019 and 2021 . see note 14 for additional information regarding the interest rate swap agreements . we also have available uncommitted credit facilities totaling $ 35.8 million . at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , the weighted average interest rate for our long-term borrowings was 2.9 percent and 3.5 percent , respectively . we paid $ 207.1 million , $ 67.5 million and $ 68.1 million in interest during 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . 13 . accumulated other comprehensive ( loss ) income oci refers to certain gains and losses that under gaap are included in comprehensive income but are excluded from net earnings as these amounts are initially recorded as an adjustment to stockholders 2019 equity . amounts in oci may be reclassified to net earnings upon the occurrence of certain events . our oci is comprised of foreign currency translation adjustments , unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges , unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities , and amortization of prior service costs and unrecognized gains and losses in actuarial assumptions on our defined benefit plans . foreign currency translation adjustments are reclassified to net earnings upon sale or upon a complete or substantially complete liquidation of an investment in a foreign entity . unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges are reclassified to net earnings when the hedged item affects net earnings . unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are reclassified to net earnings if we sell the security before maturity or if the unrealized loss is considered to be other-than-temporary . amounts related to defined benefit plans that are in oci are reclassified over the service periods of employees in the plan . the reclassification amounts are allocated to all employees in the plans and , therefore , the reclassified amounts may become part of inventory to the extent they are considered direct labor costs . see note 15 for more information on our defined benefit plans . the following table shows the changes in the components of oci , net of tax ( in millions ) : foreign currency translation hedges unrealized gains on securities defined benefit . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>cash flow hedges</td><td>unrealized gains on securities</td><td>defined benefit plan items</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance december 31 2014</td><td>$ 111.8</td><td>$ 70.1</td><td>$ -0.4 ( 0.4 )</td><td>$ -143.4 ( 143.4 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>oci before reclassifications</td><td>-305.2 ( 305.2 )</td><td>52.7</td><td>-0.2 ( 0.2 )</td><td>-30.6 ( 30.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassifications</td><td>2013</td><td>-93.0 ( 93.0 )</td><td>2013</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance december 31 2015</td><td>$ -193.4 ( 193.4 )</td><td>$ 29.8</td><td>$ -0.6 ( 0.6 )</td><td>$ -164.8 ( 164.8 )</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the balance of cash flow hedges at the end of 2015?
Answer: 29.8
Question: what about the balance of foreign currency translation?
Answer: -193.4
Question: what is the sum of these two elements?
Answer: -163.6
Question: what about the sum of the balance of unrealized gains on securities is added?
Answer: -164.2
Question: and the total if the balance of defined benefit plan items is included?
| -329.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2010 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company's common stock versus the standard and poor's s&p 500 retail index ( "s&p 500 retail index" ) and the standard and poor's s&p 500 index ( "s&p 500" ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 31 , 2010</td><td>december 31 , 2011</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>o'reilly automotive inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 148</td><td>$ 213</td><td>$ 319</td><td>$ 419</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 retail index</td><td>100</td><td>103</td><td>128</td><td>185</td><td>203</td><td>252</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 113</td><td>$ 147</td><td>$ 164</td><td>$ 163</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the value of an investment in $&p500 in 2010?
| 100.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2010 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company's common stock versus the standard and poor's s&p 500 retail index ( "s&p 500 retail index" ) and the standard and poor's s&p 500 index ( "s&p 500" ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 31 , 2010</td><td>december 31 , 2011</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>o'reilly automotive inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 148</td><td>$ 213</td><td>$ 319</td><td>$ 419</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 retail index</td><td>100</td><td>103</td><td>128</td><td>185</td><td>203</td><td>252</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 113</td><td>$ 147</td><td>$ 164</td><td>$ 163</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the value of an investment in $&p500 in 2010?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what about in 2011?
| 100.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2010 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company's common stock versus the standard and poor's s&p 500 retail index ( "s&p 500 retail index" ) and the standard and poor's s&p 500 index ( "s&p 500" ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 31 , 2010</td><td>december 31 , 2011</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>o'reilly automotive inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 148</td><td>$ 213</td><td>$ 319</td><td>$ 419</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 retail index</td><td>100</td><td>103</td><td>128</td><td>185</td><td>203</td><td>252</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 113</td><td>$ 147</td><td>$ 164</td><td>$ 163</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the value of an investment in $&p500 in 2010?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what about in 2011?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what change in value does this represent?
| 0.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2010 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company's common stock versus the standard and poor's s&p 500 retail index ( "s&p 500 retail index" ) and the standard and poor's s&p 500 index ( "s&p 500" ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 31 , 2010</td><td>december 31 , 2011</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>o'reilly automotive inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 148</td><td>$ 213</td><td>$ 319</td><td>$ 419</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 retail index</td><td>100</td><td>103</td><td>128</td><td>185</td><td>203</td><td>252</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 113</td><td>$ 147</td><td>$ 164</td><td>$ 163</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the value of an investment in $&p500 in 2010?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what about in 2011?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what change in value does this represent?
Answer: 0.0
Question: what is the value of an investment in $&p500 in 2010?
| 100.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2010 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company's common stock versus the standard and poor's s&p 500 retail index ( "s&p 500 retail index" ) and the standard and poor's s&p 500 index ( "s&p 500" ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company/index</td><td>december 31 , 2010</td><td>december 31 , 2011</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>o'reilly automotive inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 148</td><td>$ 213</td><td>$ 319</td><td>$ 419</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 retail index</td><td>100</td><td>103</td><td>128</td><td>185</td><td>203</td><td>252</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 113</td><td>$ 147</td><td>$ 164</td><td>$ 163</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the value of an investment in $&p500 in 2010?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what about in 2011?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what change in value does this represent?
Answer: 0.0
Question: what is the value of an investment in $&p500 in 2010?
Answer: 100.0
Question: what roi does this represent?
| 0.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|