input
stringlengths 833
15.3k
| output
stringlengths 2
16
| instruction
stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 25 , 2009 through october 26 , 2014 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 25 , 2009 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/25/2009</td><td>10/31/2010</td><td>10/30/2011</td><td>10/28/2012</td><td>10/27/2013</td><td>10/26/2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>97.43</td><td>101.85</td><td>88.54</td><td>151.43</td><td>183.29</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>116.52</td><td>125.94</td><td>145.09</td><td>184.52</td><td>216.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>121.00</td><td>132.42</td><td>124.95</td><td>163.20</td><td>207.93</td></tr></table> dividends during fiscal 2014 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each . during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share . during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.08 . dividends declared during fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 totaled $ 487 million , $ 469 million and $ 438 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . $ 100 invested on 10/25/09 in stock or 10/31/09 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . and the rdg semiconductor composite index 183145 97 102 121 132 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .
Question: what is the change in value of an investment in the applied materials from 2009 to 2014?
| 83.29 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 25 , 2009 through october 26 , 2014 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 25 , 2009 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/25/2009</td><td>10/31/2010</td><td>10/30/2011</td><td>10/28/2012</td><td>10/27/2013</td><td>10/26/2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>97.43</td><td>101.85</td><td>88.54</td><td>151.43</td><td>183.29</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>116.52</td><td>125.94</td><td>145.09</td><td>184.52</td><td>216.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>121.00</td><td>132.42</td><td>124.95</td><td>163.20</td><td>207.93</td></tr></table> dividends during fiscal 2014 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each . during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share . during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.08 . dividends declared during fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 totaled $ 487 million , $ 469 million and $ 438 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . $ 100 invested on 10/25/09 in stock or 10/31/09 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . and the rdg semiconductor composite index 183145 97 102 121 132 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .
Question: what is the change in value of an investment in the applied materials from 2009 to 2014?
Answer: 83.29
Question: what is the change in value of an investment in the s&p500 from 2009 to 2014?
| 116.39 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 25 , 2009 through october 26 , 2014 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 25 , 2009 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/25/2009</td><td>10/31/2010</td><td>10/30/2011</td><td>10/28/2012</td><td>10/27/2013</td><td>10/26/2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>97.43</td><td>101.85</td><td>88.54</td><td>151.43</td><td>183.29</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>116.52</td><td>125.94</td><td>145.09</td><td>184.52</td><td>216.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>121.00</td><td>132.42</td><td>124.95</td><td>163.20</td><td>207.93</td></tr></table> dividends during fiscal 2014 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each . during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share . during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.08 . dividends declared during fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 totaled $ 487 million , $ 469 million and $ 438 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . $ 100 invested on 10/25/09 in stock or 10/31/09 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . and the rdg semiconductor composite index 183145 97 102 121 132 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .
Question: what is the change in value of an investment in the applied materials from 2009 to 2014?
Answer: 83.29
Question: what is the change in value of an investment in the s&p500 from 2009 to 2014?
Answer: 116.39
Question: what is the difference in the change of investment values?
| 33.1 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american , european and asia/pacific cruise guests over the past five years ( in thousands , except berth data ) : weighted- average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 ) global cruise guests ( 1 ) american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 )</td><td>globalcruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>north american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 )</td><td>european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 )</td><td>asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>425000</td><td>98650</td><td>20813</td><td>11641</td><td>6225</td><td>1474</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>432000</td><td>98750</td><td>21343</td><td>11710</td><td>6430</td><td>2045</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>448000</td><td>105750</td><td>22039</td><td>12269</td><td>6387</td><td>2382</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>469000</td><td>112700</td><td>23000</td><td>12004</td><td>6587</td><td>3129</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>493000</td><td>123270</td><td>24000</td><td>12581</td><td>6542</td><td>3636</td></tr></table> _______________________________________________________________________________ ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources . we use data obtained from seatrade insider , cruise industry news and company press releases to estimate weighted-average supply of berths and clia and g.p . wild to estimate cruise guest information . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) total berths include our berths related to our global brands and partner brands . ( 3 ) our estimates include the united states and canada . ( 4 ) our estimates include european countries relevant to the industry ( e.g. , nordics , germany , france , italy , spain and the united kingdom ) . ( 5 ) our estimates include the southeast asia ( e.g. , singapore , thailand and the philippines ) , east asia ( e.g. , china and japan ) , south asia ( e.g. , india and pakistan ) and oceanian ( e.g. , australia and fiji islands ) regions . north america the majority of industry cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 52% ( 52 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 2% ( 2 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . europe industry cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 27% ( 27 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . asia/pacific industry cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 25% ( 25 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . the asia/pacific region is experiencing the highest growth rate of the major regions , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america . competition we compete with a number of cruise lines . our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise line , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , p&o cruises , princess cruises and seabourn ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; and norwegian cruise line holdings ltd , which owns norwegian cruise line , oceania cruises and regent seven seas cruises . cruise lines compete with .
Question: what were the number of global cruise guests in 2016?
| 24000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american , european and asia/pacific cruise guests over the past five years ( in thousands , except berth data ) : weighted- average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 ) global cruise guests ( 1 ) american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 )</td><td>globalcruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>north american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 )</td><td>european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 )</td><td>asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>425000</td><td>98650</td><td>20813</td><td>11641</td><td>6225</td><td>1474</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>432000</td><td>98750</td><td>21343</td><td>11710</td><td>6430</td><td>2045</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>448000</td><td>105750</td><td>22039</td><td>12269</td><td>6387</td><td>2382</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>469000</td><td>112700</td><td>23000</td><td>12004</td><td>6587</td><td>3129</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>493000</td><td>123270</td><td>24000</td><td>12581</td><td>6542</td><td>3636</td></tr></table> _______________________________________________________________________________ ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources . we use data obtained from seatrade insider , cruise industry news and company press releases to estimate weighted-average supply of berths and clia and g.p . wild to estimate cruise guest information . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) total berths include our berths related to our global brands and partner brands . ( 3 ) our estimates include the united states and canada . ( 4 ) our estimates include european countries relevant to the industry ( e.g. , nordics , germany , france , italy , spain and the united kingdom ) . ( 5 ) our estimates include the southeast asia ( e.g. , singapore , thailand and the philippines ) , east asia ( e.g. , china and japan ) , south asia ( e.g. , india and pakistan ) and oceanian ( e.g. , australia and fiji islands ) regions . north america the majority of industry cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 52% ( 52 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 2% ( 2 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . europe industry cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 27% ( 27 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . asia/pacific industry cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 25% ( 25 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . the asia/pacific region is experiencing the highest growth rate of the major regions , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america . competition we compete with a number of cruise lines . our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise line , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , p&o cruises , princess cruises and seabourn ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; and norwegian cruise line holdings ltd , which owns norwegian cruise line , oceania cruises and regent seven seas cruises . cruise lines compete with .
Question: what were the number of global cruise guests in 2016?
Answer: 24000.0
Question: what was the number of european guests?
| 6542.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american , european and asia/pacific cruise guests over the past five years ( in thousands , except berth data ) : weighted- average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 ) global cruise guests ( 1 ) american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 )</td><td>globalcruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>north american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 )</td><td>european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 )</td><td>asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>425000</td><td>98650</td><td>20813</td><td>11641</td><td>6225</td><td>1474</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>432000</td><td>98750</td><td>21343</td><td>11710</td><td>6430</td><td>2045</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>448000</td><td>105750</td><td>22039</td><td>12269</td><td>6387</td><td>2382</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>469000</td><td>112700</td><td>23000</td><td>12004</td><td>6587</td><td>3129</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>493000</td><td>123270</td><td>24000</td><td>12581</td><td>6542</td><td>3636</td></tr></table> _______________________________________________________________________________ ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources . we use data obtained from seatrade insider , cruise industry news and company press releases to estimate weighted-average supply of berths and clia and g.p . wild to estimate cruise guest information . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) total berths include our berths related to our global brands and partner brands . ( 3 ) our estimates include the united states and canada . ( 4 ) our estimates include european countries relevant to the industry ( e.g. , nordics , germany , france , italy , spain and the united kingdom ) . ( 5 ) our estimates include the southeast asia ( e.g. , singapore , thailand and the philippines ) , east asia ( e.g. , china and japan ) , south asia ( e.g. , india and pakistan ) and oceanian ( e.g. , australia and fiji islands ) regions . north america the majority of industry cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 52% ( 52 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 2% ( 2 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . europe industry cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 27% ( 27 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . asia/pacific industry cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 25% ( 25 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . the asia/pacific region is experiencing the highest growth rate of the major regions , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america . competition we compete with a number of cruise lines . our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise line , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , p&o cruises , princess cruises and seabourn ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; and norwegian cruise line holdings ltd , which owns norwegian cruise line , oceania cruises and regent seven seas cruises . cruise lines compete with .
Question: what were the number of global cruise guests in 2016?
Answer: 24000.0
Question: what was the number of european guests?
Answer: 6542.0
Question: what is the difference?
| 17458.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american , european and asia/pacific cruise guests over the past five years ( in thousands , except berth data ) : weighted- average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 ) global cruise guests ( 1 ) american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 )</td><td>globalcruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>north american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 )</td><td>european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 )</td><td>asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>425000</td><td>98650</td><td>20813</td><td>11641</td><td>6225</td><td>1474</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>432000</td><td>98750</td><td>21343</td><td>11710</td><td>6430</td><td>2045</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>448000</td><td>105750</td><td>22039</td><td>12269</td><td>6387</td><td>2382</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>469000</td><td>112700</td><td>23000</td><td>12004</td><td>6587</td><td>3129</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>493000</td><td>123270</td><td>24000</td><td>12581</td><td>6542</td><td>3636</td></tr></table> _______________________________________________________________________________ ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources . we use data obtained from seatrade insider , cruise industry news and company press releases to estimate weighted-average supply of berths and clia and g.p . wild to estimate cruise guest information . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) total berths include our berths related to our global brands and partner brands . ( 3 ) our estimates include the united states and canada . ( 4 ) our estimates include european countries relevant to the industry ( e.g. , nordics , germany , france , italy , spain and the united kingdom ) . ( 5 ) our estimates include the southeast asia ( e.g. , singapore , thailand and the philippines ) , east asia ( e.g. , china and japan ) , south asia ( e.g. , india and pakistan ) and oceanian ( e.g. , australia and fiji islands ) regions . north america the majority of industry cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 52% ( 52 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 2% ( 2 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . europe industry cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 27% ( 27 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . asia/pacific industry cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 25% ( 25 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . the asia/pacific region is experiencing the highest growth rate of the major regions , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america . competition we compete with a number of cruise lines . our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise line , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , p&o cruises , princess cruises and seabourn ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; and norwegian cruise line holdings ltd , which owns norwegian cruise line , oceania cruises and regent seven seas cruises . cruise lines compete with .
Question: what were the number of global cruise guests in 2016?
Answer: 24000.0
Question: what was the number of european guests?
Answer: 6542.0
Question: what is the difference?
Answer: 17458.0
Question: what is the difference divided by the total global cruise guests in 2016?
| 0.72742 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the following table details the growth in global weighted average berths and the global , north american , european and asia/pacific cruise guests over the past five years ( in thousands , except berth data ) : weighted- average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 ) global cruise guests ( 1 ) american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 ) european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 ) asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>royal caribbean cruises ltd . total berths ( 2 )</td><td>globalcruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>north american cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 3 )</td><td>european cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 4 )</td><td>asia/pacific cruise guests ( 1 ) ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>425000</td><td>98650</td><td>20813</td><td>11641</td><td>6225</td><td>1474</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>432000</td><td>98750</td><td>21343</td><td>11710</td><td>6430</td><td>2045</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>448000</td><td>105750</td><td>22039</td><td>12269</td><td>6387</td><td>2382</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>469000</td><td>112700</td><td>23000</td><td>12004</td><td>6587</td><td>3129</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2016</td><td>493000</td><td>123270</td><td>24000</td><td>12581</td><td>6542</td><td>3636</td></tr></table> _______________________________________________________________________________ ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources . we use data obtained from seatrade insider , cruise industry news and company press releases to estimate weighted-average supply of berths and clia and g.p . wild to estimate cruise guest information . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) total berths include our berths related to our global brands and partner brands . ( 3 ) our estimates include the united states and canada . ( 4 ) our estimates include european countries relevant to the industry ( e.g. , nordics , germany , france , italy , spain and the united kingdom ) . ( 5 ) our estimates include the southeast asia ( e.g. , singapore , thailand and the philippines ) , east asia ( e.g. , china and japan ) , south asia ( e.g. , india and pakistan ) and oceanian ( e.g. , australia and fiji islands ) regions . north america the majority of industry cruise guests are sourced from north america , which represented approximately 52% ( 52 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 2% ( 2 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . europe industry cruise guests sourced from europe represented approximately 27% ( 27 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . asia/pacific industry cruise guests sourced from the asia/pacific region represented approximately 15% ( 15 % ) of global cruise guests in 2016 . the compound annual growth rate in cruise guests sourced from this market was approximately 25% ( 25 % ) from 2012 to 2016 . the asia/pacific region is experiencing the highest growth rate of the major regions , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america . competition we compete with a number of cruise lines . our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise line , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , p&o cruises , princess cruises and seabourn ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; and norwegian cruise line holdings ltd , which owns norwegian cruise line , oceania cruises and regent seven seas cruises . cruise lines compete with .
Question: what were the number of global cruise guests in 2016?
Answer: 24000.0
Question: what was the number of european guests?
Answer: 6542.0
Question: what is the difference?
Answer: 17458.0
Question: what is the difference divided by the total global cruise guests in 2016?
Answer: 0.72742
Question: what is that times 100?
| 72.74167 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
air mobility sales declined by $ 535 million primarily due to c-130j deliveries ( 12 in 2006 compared to 15 in 2005 ) and lower volume on the c-5 program . combat aircraft sales increased by $ 292 million mainly due to higher f-35 and f-22 volume , partially offset by reduced volume on f-16 programs . other aeronautics programs sales increased by $ 83 million primarily due to higher volume in sustainment services activities . operating profit for the segment increased 21% ( 21 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . operating profit increases in combat aircraft more than offset decreases in other aeronautics programs and air mobility . combat aircraft operating profit increased $ 326 million mainly due to improved performance on f-22 and f-16 programs . air mobility and other aeronautics programs declined $ 77 million due to lower operating profit in support and sustainment activities . operating profit for the segment increased 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased in both combat aircraft and air mobility . combat aircraft increased $ 114 million , mainly due to higher volume on the f-35 and f-22 programs , and improved performance on f-16 programs . the improvement for the year was also attributable in part to the fact that in 2005 , operating profit included a reduction in earnings on the f-35 program . air mobility operating profit increased $ 84 million , mainly due to improved performance on c-130j sustainment activities in 2006 . backlog decreased in 2007 as compared to 2006 primarily as a result of sales volume on the f-35 program . this decrease was offset partially by increased orders on the f-22 and c-130j programs . electronic systems electronic systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 11143</td><td>$ 10519</td><td>$ 9811</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1410</td><td>1264</td><td>1078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>21200</td><td>19700</td><td>18600</td></tr></table> net sales for electronic systems increased by 6% ( 6 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . sales increased in missiles & fire control ( m&fc ) , maritime systems & sensors ( ms2 ) , and platform , training & energy ( pt&e ) . m&fc sales increased $ 258 million mainly due to higher volume in fire control systems and air defense programs , which more than offset declines in tactical missile programs . ms2 sales grew $ 254 million due to volume increases in undersea and radar systems activities that were offset partially by decreases in surface systems activities . pt&e sales increased $ 113 million , primarily due to higher volume in platform integration activities , which more than offset declines in distribution technology activities . net sales for electronic systems increased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . higher volume in platform integration activities led to increased sales of $ 329 million at pt&e . ms2 sales increased $ 267 million primarily due to surface systems activities . air defense programs contributed to increased sales of $ 118 million at m&fc . operating profit for the segment increased by 12% ( 12 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 , representing an increase in all three lines of business during the year . operating profit increased $ 70 million at pt&e primarily due to higher volume and improved performance on platform integration activities . ms2 operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume on undersea and tactical systems activities that more than offset lower volume on surface systems activities . at m&fc , operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume in fire control systems and improved performance in tactical missile programs , which partially were offset by performance on certain international air defense programs in 2006 . operating profit for the segment increased by 17% ( 17 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased by $ 74 million at ms2 mainly due to higher volume on surface systems and undersea programs . pt&e operating profit increased $ 61 million mainly due to improved performance on distribution technology activities . higher volume on air defense programs contributed to a $ 52 million increase in operating profit at m&fc . the increase in backlog during 2007 over 2006 resulted primarily from increased orders for certain tactical missile programs and fire control systems at m&fc and platform integration programs at pt&e. .
Question: what is the backlog at the end of 2006?
| 19700.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
air mobility sales declined by $ 535 million primarily due to c-130j deliveries ( 12 in 2006 compared to 15 in 2005 ) and lower volume on the c-5 program . combat aircraft sales increased by $ 292 million mainly due to higher f-35 and f-22 volume , partially offset by reduced volume on f-16 programs . other aeronautics programs sales increased by $ 83 million primarily due to higher volume in sustainment services activities . operating profit for the segment increased 21% ( 21 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . operating profit increases in combat aircraft more than offset decreases in other aeronautics programs and air mobility . combat aircraft operating profit increased $ 326 million mainly due to improved performance on f-22 and f-16 programs . air mobility and other aeronautics programs declined $ 77 million due to lower operating profit in support and sustainment activities . operating profit for the segment increased 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased in both combat aircraft and air mobility . combat aircraft increased $ 114 million , mainly due to higher volume on the f-35 and f-22 programs , and improved performance on f-16 programs . the improvement for the year was also attributable in part to the fact that in 2005 , operating profit included a reduction in earnings on the f-35 program . air mobility operating profit increased $ 84 million , mainly due to improved performance on c-130j sustainment activities in 2006 . backlog decreased in 2007 as compared to 2006 primarily as a result of sales volume on the f-35 program . this decrease was offset partially by increased orders on the f-22 and c-130j programs . electronic systems electronic systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 11143</td><td>$ 10519</td><td>$ 9811</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1410</td><td>1264</td><td>1078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>21200</td><td>19700</td><td>18600</td></tr></table> net sales for electronic systems increased by 6% ( 6 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . sales increased in missiles & fire control ( m&fc ) , maritime systems & sensors ( ms2 ) , and platform , training & energy ( pt&e ) . m&fc sales increased $ 258 million mainly due to higher volume in fire control systems and air defense programs , which more than offset declines in tactical missile programs . ms2 sales grew $ 254 million due to volume increases in undersea and radar systems activities that were offset partially by decreases in surface systems activities . pt&e sales increased $ 113 million , primarily due to higher volume in platform integration activities , which more than offset declines in distribution technology activities . net sales for electronic systems increased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . higher volume in platform integration activities led to increased sales of $ 329 million at pt&e . ms2 sales increased $ 267 million primarily due to surface systems activities . air defense programs contributed to increased sales of $ 118 million at m&fc . operating profit for the segment increased by 12% ( 12 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 , representing an increase in all three lines of business during the year . operating profit increased $ 70 million at pt&e primarily due to higher volume and improved performance on platform integration activities . ms2 operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume on undersea and tactical systems activities that more than offset lower volume on surface systems activities . at m&fc , operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume in fire control systems and improved performance in tactical missile programs , which partially were offset by performance on certain international air defense programs in 2006 . operating profit for the segment increased by 17% ( 17 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased by $ 74 million at ms2 mainly due to higher volume on surface systems and undersea programs . pt&e operating profit increased $ 61 million mainly due to improved performance on distribution technology activities . higher volume on air defense programs contributed to a $ 52 million increase in operating profit at m&fc . the increase in backlog during 2007 over 2006 resulted primarily from increased orders for certain tactical missile programs and fire control systems at m&fc and platform integration programs at pt&e. .
Question: what is the backlog at the end of 2006?
Answer: 19700.0
Question: what about 2005?
| 18600.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
air mobility sales declined by $ 535 million primarily due to c-130j deliveries ( 12 in 2006 compared to 15 in 2005 ) and lower volume on the c-5 program . combat aircraft sales increased by $ 292 million mainly due to higher f-35 and f-22 volume , partially offset by reduced volume on f-16 programs . other aeronautics programs sales increased by $ 83 million primarily due to higher volume in sustainment services activities . operating profit for the segment increased 21% ( 21 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . operating profit increases in combat aircraft more than offset decreases in other aeronautics programs and air mobility . combat aircraft operating profit increased $ 326 million mainly due to improved performance on f-22 and f-16 programs . air mobility and other aeronautics programs declined $ 77 million due to lower operating profit in support and sustainment activities . operating profit for the segment increased 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased in both combat aircraft and air mobility . combat aircraft increased $ 114 million , mainly due to higher volume on the f-35 and f-22 programs , and improved performance on f-16 programs . the improvement for the year was also attributable in part to the fact that in 2005 , operating profit included a reduction in earnings on the f-35 program . air mobility operating profit increased $ 84 million , mainly due to improved performance on c-130j sustainment activities in 2006 . backlog decreased in 2007 as compared to 2006 primarily as a result of sales volume on the f-35 program . this decrease was offset partially by increased orders on the f-22 and c-130j programs . electronic systems electronic systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 11143</td><td>$ 10519</td><td>$ 9811</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1410</td><td>1264</td><td>1078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>21200</td><td>19700</td><td>18600</td></tr></table> net sales for electronic systems increased by 6% ( 6 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . sales increased in missiles & fire control ( m&fc ) , maritime systems & sensors ( ms2 ) , and platform , training & energy ( pt&e ) . m&fc sales increased $ 258 million mainly due to higher volume in fire control systems and air defense programs , which more than offset declines in tactical missile programs . ms2 sales grew $ 254 million due to volume increases in undersea and radar systems activities that were offset partially by decreases in surface systems activities . pt&e sales increased $ 113 million , primarily due to higher volume in platform integration activities , which more than offset declines in distribution technology activities . net sales for electronic systems increased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . higher volume in platform integration activities led to increased sales of $ 329 million at pt&e . ms2 sales increased $ 267 million primarily due to surface systems activities . air defense programs contributed to increased sales of $ 118 million at m&fc . operating profit for the segment increased by 12% ( 12 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 , representing an increase in all three lines of business during the year . operating profit increased $ 70 million at pt&e primarily due to higher volume and improved performance on platform integration activities . ms2 operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume on undersea and tactical systems activities that more than offset lower volume on surface systems activities . at m&fc , operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume in fire control systems and improved performance in tactical missile programs , which partially were offset by performance on certain international air defense programs in 2006 . operating profit for the segment increased by 17% ( 17 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased by $ 74 million at ms2 mainly due to higher volume on surface systems and undersea programs . pt&e operating profit increased $ 61 million mainly due to improved performance on distribution technology activities . higher volume on air defense programs contributed to a $ 52 million increase in operating profit at m&fc . the increase in backlog during 2007 over 2006 resulted primarily from increased orders for certain tactical missile programs and fire control systems at m&fc and platform integration programs at pt&e. .
Question: what is the backlog at the end of 2006?
Answer: 19700.0
Question: what about 2005?
Answer: 18600.0
Question: what is the difference
| 1100.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
air mobility sales declined by $ 535 million primarily due to c-130j deliveries ( 12 in 2006 compared to 15 in 2005 ) and lower volume on the c-5 program . combat aircraft sales increased by $ 292 million mainly due to higher f-35 and f-22 volume , partially offset by reduced volume on f-16 programs . other aeronautics programs sales increased by $ 83 million primarily due to higher volume in sustainment services activities . operating profit for the segment increased 21% ( 21 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . operating profit increases in combat aircraft more than offset decreases in other aeronautics programs and air mobility . combat aircraft operating profit increased $ 326 million mainly due to improved performance on f-22 and f-16 programs . air mobility and other aeronautics programs declined $ 77 million due to lower operating profit in support and sustainment activities . operating profit for the segment increased 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased in both combat aircraft and air mobility . combat aircraft increased $ 114 million , mainly due to higher volume on the f-35 and f-22 programs , and improved performance on f-16 programs . the improvement for the year was also attributable in part to the fact that in 2005 , operating profit included a reduction in earnings on the f-35 program . air mobility operating profit increased $ 84 million , mainly due to improved performance on c-130j sustainment activities in 2006 . backlog decreased in 2007 as compared to 2006 primarily as a result of sales volume on the f-35 program . this decrease was offset partially by increased orders on the f-22 and c-130j programs . electronic systems electronic systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 11143</td><td>$ 10519</td><td>$ 9811</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1410</td><td>1264</td><td>1078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>21200</td><td>19700</td><td>18600</td></tr></table> net sales for electronic systems increased by 6% ( 6 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . sales increased in missiles & fire control ( m&fc ) , maritime systems & sensors ( ms2 ) , and platform , training & energy ( pt&e ) . m&fc sales increased $ 258 million mainly due to higher volume in fire control systems and air defense programs , which more than offset declines in tactical missile programs . ms2 sales grew $ 254 million due to volume increases in undersea and radar systems activities that were offset partially by decreases in surface systems activities . pt&e sales increased $ 113 million , primarily due to higher volume in platform integration activities , which more than offset declines in distribution technology activities . net sales for electronic systems increased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . higher volume in platform integration activities led to increased sales of $ 329 million at pt&e . ms2 sales increased $ 267 million primarily due to surface systems activities . air defense programs contributed to increased sales of $ 118 million at m&fc . operating profit for the segment increased by 12% ( 12 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 , representing an increase in all three lines of business during the year . operating profit increased $ 70 million at pt&e primarily due to higher volume and improved performance on platform integration activities . ms2 operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume on undersea and tactical systems activities that more than offset lower volume on surface systems activities . at m&fc , operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume in fire control systems and improved performance in tactical missile programs , which partially were offset by performance on certain international air defense programs in 2006 . operating profit for the segment increased by 17% ( 17 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased by $ 74 million at ms2 mainly due to higher volume on surface systems and undersea programs . pt&e operating profit increased $ 61 million mainly due to improved performance on distribution technology activities . higher volume on air defense programs contributed to a $ 52 million increase in operating profit at m&fc . the increase in backlog during 2007 over 2006 resulted primarily from increased orders for certain tactical missile programs and fire control systems at m&fc and platform integration programs at pt&e. .
Question: what is the backlog at the end of 2006?
Answer: 19700.0
Question: what about 2005?
Answer: 18600.0
Question: what is the difference
Answer: 1100.0
Question: what is the backlog at the end of 2005?
| 18600.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
air mobility sales declined by $ 535 million primarily due to c-130j deliveries ( 12 in 2006 compared to 15 in 2005 ) and lower volume on the c-5 program . combat aircraft sales increased by $ 292 million mainly due to higher f-35 and f-22 volume , partially offset by reduced volume on f-16 programs . other aeronautics programs sales increased by $ 83 million primarily due to higher volume in sustainment services activities . operating profit for the segment increased 21% ( 21 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . operating profit increases in combat aircraft more than offset decreases in other aeronautics programs and air mobility . combat aircraft operating profit increased $ 326 million mainly due to improved performance on f-22 and f-16 programs . air mobility and other aeronautics programs declined $ 77 million due to lower operating profit in support and sustainment activities . operating profit for the segment increased 20% ( 20 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased in both combat aircraft and air mobility . combat aircraft increased $ 114 million , mainly due to higher volume on the f-35 and f-22 programs , and improved performance on f-16 programs . the improvement for the year was also attributable in part to the fact that in 2005 , operating profit included a reduction in earnings on the f-35 program . air mobility operating profit increased $ 84 million , mainly due to improved performance on c-130j sustainment activities in 2006 . backlog decreased in 2007 as compared to 2006 primarily as a result of sales volume on the f-35 program . this decrease was offset partially by increased orders on the f-22 and c-130j programs . electronic systems electronic systems 2019 operating results included the following : ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 11143</td><td>$ 10519</td><td>$ 9811</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1410</td><td>1264</td><td>1078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>21200</td><td>19700</td><td>18600</td></tr></table> net sales for electronic systems increased by 6% ( 6 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 . sales increased in missiles & fire control ( m&fc ) , maritime systems & sensors ( ms2 ) , and platform , training & energy ( pt&e ) . m&fc sales increased $ 258 million mainly due to higher volume in fire control systems and air defense programs , which more than offset declines in tactical missile programs . ms2 sales grew $ 254 million due to volume increases in undersea and radar systems activities that were offset partially by decreases in surface systems activities . pt&e sales increased $ 113 million , primarily due to higher volume in platform integration activities , which more than offset declines in distribution technology activities . net sales for electronic systems increased by 7% ( 7 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . higher volume in platform integration activities led to increased sales of $ 329 million at pt&e . ms2 sales increased $ 267 million primarily due to surface systems activities . air defense programs contributed to increased sales of $ 118 million at m&fc . operating profit for the segment increased by 12% ( 12 % ) in 2007 compared to 2006 , representing an increase in all three lines of business during the year . operating profit increased $ 70 million at pt&e primarily due to higher volume and improved performance on platform integration activities . ms2 operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume on undersea and tactical systems activities that more than offset lower volume on surface systems activities . at m&fc , operating profit increased $ 32 million due to higher volume in fire control systems and improved performance in tactical missile programs , which partially were offset by performance on certain international air defense programs in 2006 . operating profit for the segment increased by 17% ( 17 % ) in 2006 compared to 2005 . operating profit increased by $ 74 million at ms2 mainly due to higher volume on surface systems and undersea programs . pt&e operating profit increased $ 61 million mainly due to improved performance on distribution technology activities . higher volume on air defense programs contributed to a $ 52 million increase in operating profit at m&fc . the increase in backlog during 2007 over 2006 resulted primarily from increased orders for certain tactical missile programs and fire control systems at m&fc and platform integration programs at pt&e. .
Question: what is the backlog at the end of 2006?
Answer: 19700.0
Question: what about 2005?
Answer: 18600.0
Question: what is the difference
Answer: 1100.0
Question: what is the backlog at the end of 2005?
Answer: 18600.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.05914 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
freesheet paper were higher in russia , but lower in europe reflecting weak economic conditions and market demand . average sales price realizations for pulp decreased . lower input costs for wood and purchased fiber were partially offset by higher costs for energy , chemicals and packaging . freight costs were also higher . planned maintenance downtime costs were higher due to executing a significant once-every-ten-years maintenance outage plus the regularly scheduled 18-month outage at the saillat mill while outage costs in russia and poland were lower . manufacturing operating costs were favor- entering 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to be seasonally weaker in russia , but about flat in europe . average sales price realizations for uncoated freesheet paper are expected to decrease in europe , but increase in russia . input costs should be higher in russia , especially for wood and energy , but be slightly lower in europe . no maintenance outages are scheduled for the first quarter . ind ian papers includes the results of andhra pradesh paper mills ( appm ) of which a 75% ( 75 % ) interest was acquired on october 14 , 2011 . net sales were $ 185 million in 2012 and $ 35 million in 2011 . operat- ing profits were a loss of $ 16 million in 2012 and a loss of $ 3 million in 2011 . asian pr int ing papers net sales were $ 85 mil- lion in 2012 , $ 75 million in 2011 and $ 80 million in 2010 . operating profits were improved from break- even in past years to $ 1 million in 2012 . u.s . pulp net sales were $ 725 million in 2012 compared with $ 725 million in 2011 and $ 715 million in 2010 . operating profits were a loss of $ 59 million in 2012 compared with gains of $ 87 million in 2011 and $ 107 million in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 increased from 2011 primarily due to the start-up of pulp production at the franklin mill in the third quarter of 2012 . average sales price realizations were significantly lower for both fluff pulp and market pulp . input costs were lower , primarily for wood and energy . freight costs were slightly lower . mill operating costs were unfavorable primarily due to costs associated with the start-up of the franklin mill . planned maintenance downtime costs were lower . in the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be flat with the fourth quarter of 2012 . average sales price realizations are expected to improve reflecting the realization of sales price increases for paper and tissue pulp that were announced in the fourth quarter of 2012 . input costs should be flat . planned maintenance downtime costs should be about $ 9 million higher than in the fourth quarter of 2012 . manufacturing costs related to the franklin mill should be lower as we continue to improve operations . consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . consumer packaging net sales in 2012 decreased 15% ( 15 % ) from 2011 and 7% ( 7 % ) from 2010 . operating profits increased 64% ( 64 % ) from 2011 and 29% ( 29 % ) from 2010 . net sales and operating profits include the shorewood business in 2011 and 2010 . exclud- ing asset impairment and other charges associated with the sale of the shorewood business , and facility closure costs , 2012 operating profits were 27% ( 27 % ) lower than in 2011 , but 23% ( 23 % ) higher than in 2010 . benefits from lower raw material costs ( $ 22 million ) , lower maintenance outage costs ( $ 5 million ) and other items ( $ 2 million ) were more than offset by lower sales price realizations and an unfavorable product mix ( $ 66 million ) , lower sales volumes and increased market-related downtime ( $ 22 million ) , and higher operating costs ( $ 40 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2012 included a gain of $ 3 million related to the sale of the shorewood business while operating profits in 2011 included a $ 129 million fixed asset impairment charge for the north ameri- can shorewood business and $ 72 million for other charges associated with the sale of the shorewood business . consumer packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 3170</td><td>$ 3710</td><td>$ 3400</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>268</td><td>163</td><td>207</td></tr></table> north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2011 and $ 2.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits were $ 165 million ( $ 162 million excluding a gain related to the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2012 compared with $ 35 million ( $ 236 million excluding asset impairment and other charges asso- ciated with the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2011 and $ 97 million ( $ 105 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . coated paperboard sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting weaker market demand . average sales price realizations were lower , primar- ily for folding carton board . input costs for wood increased , but were partially offset by lower costs for chemicals and energy . planned maintenance down- time costs were slightly lower . market-related down- time was about 113000 tons in 2012 compared with about 38000 tons in 2011. .
Question: what was the total amount of the north american consumer packaging net sales in 2012, in millions?
| 2000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
freesheet paper were higher in russia , but lower in europe reflecting weak economic conditions and market demand . average sales price realizations for pulp decreased . lower input costs for wood and purchased fiber were partially offset by higher costs for energy , chemicals and packaging . freight costs were also higher . planned maintenance downtime costs were higher due to executing a significant once-every-ten-years maintenance outage plus the regularly scheduled 18-month outage at the saillat mill while outage costs in russia and poland were lower . manufacturing operating costs were favor- entering 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to be seasonally weaker in russia , but about flat in europe . average sales price realizations for uncoated freesheet paper are expected to decrease in europe , but increase in russia . input costs should be higher in russia , especially for wood and energy , but be slightly lower in europe . no maintenance outages are scheduled for the first quarter . ind ian papers includes the results of andhra pradesh paper mills ( appm ) of which a 75% ( 75 % ) interest was acquired on october 14 , 2011 . net sales were $ 185 million in 2012 and $ 35 million in 2011 . operat- ing profits were a loss of $ 16 million in 2012 and a loss of $ 3 million in 2011 . asian pr int ing papers net sales were $ 85 mil- lion in 2012 , $ 75 million in 2011 and $ 80 million in 2010 . operating profits were improved from break- even in past years to $ 1 million in 2012 . u.s . pulp net sales were $ 725 million in 2012 compared with $ 725 million in 2011 and $ 715 million in 2010 . operating profits were a loss of $ 59 million in 2012 compared with gains of $ 87 million in 2011 and $ 107 million in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 increased from 2011 primarily due to the start-up of pulp production at the franklin mill in the third quarter of 2012 . average sales price realizations were significantly lower for both fluff pulp and market pulp . input costs were lower , primarily for wood and energy . freight costs were slightly lower . mill operating costs were unfavorable primarily due to costs associated with the start-up of the franklin mill . planned maintenance downtime costs were lower . in the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be flat with the fourth quarter of 2012 . average sales price realizations are expected to improve reflecting the realization of sales price increases for paper and tissue pulp that were announced in the fourth quarter of 2012 . input costs should be flat . planned maintenance downtime costs should be about $ 9 million higher than in the fourth quarter of 2012 . manufacturing costs related to the franklin mill should be lower as we continue to improve operations . consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . consumer packaging net sales in 2012 decreased 15% ( 15 % ) from 2011 and 7% ( 7 % ) from 2010 . operating profits increased 64% ( 64 % ) from 2011 and 29% ( 29 % ) from 2010 . net sales and operating profits include the shorewood business in 2011 and 2010 . exclud- ing asset impairment and other charges associated with the sale of the shorewood business , and facility closure costs , 2012 operating profits were 27% ( 27 % ) lower than in 2011 , but 23% ( 23 % ) higher than in 2010 . benefits from lower raw material costs ( $ 22 million ) , lower maintenance outage costs ( $ 5 million ) and other items ( $ 2 million ) were more than offset by lower sales price realizations and an unfavorable product mix ( $ 66 million ) , lower sales volumes and increased market-related downtime ( $ 22 million ) , and higher operating costs ( $ 40 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2012 included a gain of $ 3 million related to the sale of the shorewood business while operating profits in 2011 included a $ 129 million fixed asset impairment charge for the north ameri- can shorewood business and $ 72 million for other charges associated with the sale of the shorewood business . consumer packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 3170</td><td>$ 3710</td><td>$ 3400</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>268</td><td>163</td><td>207</td></tr></table> north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2011 and $ 2.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits were $ 165 million ( $ 162 million excluding a gain related to the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2012 compared with $ 35 million ( $ 236 million excluding asset impairment and other charges asso- ciated with the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2011 and $ 97 million ( $ 105 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . coated paperboard sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting weaker market demand . average sales price realizations were lower , primar- ily for folding carton board . input costs for wood increased , but were partially offset by lower costs for chemicals and energy . planned maintenance down- time costs were slightly lower . market-related down- time was about 113000 tons in 2012 compared with about 38000 tons in 2011. .
Question: what was the total amount of the north american consumer packaging net sales in 2012, in millions?
Answer: 2000.0
Question: and what were the total consumer packaging sales in that year?
| 3170.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
freesheet paper were higher in russia , but lower in europe reflecting weak economic conditions and market demand . average sales price realizations for pulp decreased . lower input costs for wood and purchased fiber were partially offset by higher costs for energy , chemicals and packaging . freight costs were also higher . planned maintenance downtime costs were higher due to executing a significant once-every-ten-years maintenance outage plus the regularly scheduled 18-month outage at the saillat mill while outage costs in russia and poland were lower . manufacturing operating costs were favor- entering 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to be seasonally weaker in russia , but about flat in europe . average sales price realizations for uncoated freesheet paper are expected to decrease in europe , but increase in russia . input costs should be higher in russia , especially for wood and energy , but be slightly lower in europe . no maintenance outages are scheduled for the first quarter . ind ian papers includes the results of andhra pradesh paper mills ( appm ) of which a 75% ( 75 % ) interest was acquired on october 14 , 2011 . net sales were $ 185 million in 2012 and $ 35 million in 2011 . operat- ing profits were a loss of $ 16 million in 2012 and a loss of $ 3 million in 2011 . asian pr int ing papers net sales were $ 85 mil- lion in 2012 , $ 75 million in 2011 and $ 80 million in 2010 . operating profits were improved from break- even in past years to $ 1 million in 2012 . u.s . pulp net sales were $ 725 million in 2012 compared with $ 725 million in 2011 and $ 715 million in 2010 . operating profits were a loss of $ 59 million in 2012 compared with gains of $ 87 million in 2011 and $ 107 million in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 increased from 2011 primarily due to the start-up of pulp production at the franklin mill in the third quarter of 2012 . average sales price realizations were significantly lower for both fluff pulp and market pulp . input costs were lower , primarily for wood and energy . freight costs were slightly lower . mill operating costs were unfavorable primarily due to costs associated with the start-up of the franklin mill . planned maintenance downtime costs were lower . in the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be flat with the fourth quarter of 2012 . average sales price realizations are expected to improve reflecting the realization of sales price increases for paper and tissue pulp that were announced in the fourth quarter of 2012 . input costs should be flat . planned maintenance downtime costs should be about $ 9 million higher than in the fourth quarter of 2012 . manufacturing costs related to the franklin mill should be lower as we continue to improve operations . consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . consumer packaging net sales in 2012 decreased 15% ( 15 % ) from 2011 and 7% ( 7 % ) from 2010 . operating profits increased 64% ( 64 % ) from 2011 and 29% ( 29 % ) from 2010 . net sales and operating profits include the shorewood business in 2011 and 2010 . exclud- ing asset impairment and other charges associated with the sale of the shorewood business , and facility closure costs , 2012 operating profits were 27% ( 27 % ) lower than in 2011 , but 23% ( 23 % ) higher than in 2010 . benefits from lower raw material costs ( $ 22 million ) , lower maintenance outage costs ( $ 5 million ) and other items ( $ 2 million ) were more than offset by lower sales price realizations and an unfavorable product mix ( $ 66 million ) , lower sales volumes and increased market-related downtime ( $ 22 million ) , and higher operating costs ( $ 40 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2012 included a gain of $ 3 million related to the sale of the shorewood business while operating profits in 2011 included a $ 129 million fixed asset impairment charge for the north ameri- can shorewood business and $ 72 million for other charges associated with the sale of the shorewood business . consumer packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 3170</td><td>$ 3710</td><td>$ 3400</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>268</td><td>163</td><td>207</td></tr></table> north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2011 and $ 2.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits were $ 165 million ( $ 162 million excluding a gain related to the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2012 compared with $ 35 million ( $ 236 million excluding asset impairment and other charges asso- ciated with the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2011 and $ 97 million ( $ 105 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . coated paperboard sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting weaker market demand . average sales price realizations were lower , primar- ily for folding carton board . input costs for wood increased , but were partially offset by lower costs for chemicals and energy . planned maintenance down- time costs were slightly lower . market-related down- time was about 113000 tons in 2012 compared with about 38000 tons in 2011. .
Question: what was the total amount of the north american consumer packaging net sales in 2012, in millions?
Answer: 2000.0
Question: and what were the total consumer packaging sales in that year?
Answer: 3170.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total sales did that total amount represent?
| 0.63091 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
freesheet paper were higher in russia , but lower in europe reflecting weak economic conditions and market demand . average sales price realizations for pulp decreased . lower input costs for wood and purchased fiber were partially offset by higher costs for energy , chemicals and packaging . freight costs were also higher . planned maintenance downtime costs were higher due to executing a significant once-every-ten-years maintenance outage plus the regularly scheduled 18-month outage at the saillat mill while outage costs in russia and poland were lower . manufacturing operating costs were favor- entering 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to be seasonally weaker in russia , but about flat in europe . average sales price realizations for uncoated freesheet paper are expected to decrease in europe , but increase in russia . input costs should be higher in russia , especially for wood and energy , but be slightly lower in europe . no maintenance outages are scheduled for the first quarter . ind ian papers includes the results of andhra pradesh paper mills ( appm ) of which a 75% ( 75 % ) interest was acquired on october 14 , 2011 . net sales were $ 185 million in 2012 and $ 35 million in 2011 . operat- ing profits were a loss of $ 16 million in 2012 and a loss of $ 3 million in 2011 . asian pr int ing papers net sales were $ 85 mil- lion in 2012 , $ 75 million in 2011 and $ 80 million in 2010 . operating profits were improved from break- even in past years to $ 1 million in 2012 . u.s . pulp net sales were $ 725 million in 2012 compared with $ 725 million in 2011 and $ 715 million in 2010 . operating profits were a loss of $ 59 million in 2012 compared with gains of $ 87 million in 2011 and $ 107 million in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 increased from 2011 primarily due to the start-up of pulp production at the franklin mill in the third quarter of 2012 . average sales price realizations were significantly lower for both fluff pulp and market pulp . input costs were lower , primarily for wood and energy . freight costs were slightly lower . mill operating costs were unfavorable primarily due to costs associated with the start-up of the franklin mill . planned maintenance downtime costs were lower . in the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be flat with the fourth quarter of 2012 . average sales price realizations are expected to improve reflecting the realization of sales price increases for paper and tissue pulp that were announced in the fourth quarter of 2012 . input costs should be flat . planned maintenance downtime costs should be about $ 9 million higher than in the fourth quarter of 2012 . manufacturing costs related to the franklin mill should be lower as we continue to improve operations . consumer packaging demand and pricing for consumer packaging prod- ucts correlate closely with consumer spending and general economic activity . in addition to prices and volumes , major factors affecting the profitability of consumer packaging are raw material and energy costs , freight costs , manufacturing efficiency and product mix . consumer packaging net sales in 2012 decreased 15% ( 15 % ) from 2011 and 7% ( 7 % ) from 2010 . operating profits increased 64% ( 64 % ) from 2011 and 29% ( 29 % ) from 2010 . net sales and operating profits include the shorewood business in 2011 and 2010 . exclud- ing asset impairment and other charges associated with the sale of the shorewood business , and facility closure costs , 2012 operating profits were 27% ( 27 % ) lower than in 2011 , but 23% ( 23 % ) higher than in 2010 . benefits from lower raw material costs ( $ 22 million ) , lower maintenance outage costs ( $ 5 million ) and other items ( $ 2 million ) were more than offset by lower sales price realizations and an unfavorable product mix ( $ 66 million ) , lower sales volumes and increased market-related downtime ( $ 22 million ) , and higher operating costs ( $ 40 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2012 included a gain of $ 3 million related to the sale of the shorewood business while operating profits in 2011 included a $ 129 million fixed asset impairment charge for the north ameri- can shorewood business and $ 72 million for other charges associated with the sale of the shorewood business . consumer packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 3170</td><td>$ 3710</td><td>$ 3400</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>268</td><td>163</td><td>207</td></tr></table> north american consumer packaging net sales were $ 2.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 2.5 billion in 2011 and $ 2.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits were $ 165 million ( $ 162 million excluding a gain related to the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2012 compared with $ 35 million ( $ 236 million excluding asset impairment and other charges asso- ciated with the sale of the shorewood business ) in 2011 and $ 97 million ( $ 105 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . coated paperboard sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting weaker market demand . average sales price realizations were lower , primar- ily for folding carton board . input costs for wood increased , but were partially offset by lower costs for chemicals and energy . planned maintenance down- time costs were slightly lower . market-related down- time was about 113000 tons in 2012 compared with about 38000 tons in 2011. .
Question: what was the total amount of the north american consumer packaging net sales in 2012, in millions?
Answer: 2000.0
Question: and what were the total consumer packaging sales in that year?
Answer: 3170.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total sales did that total amount represent?
Answer: 0.63091
Question: and what was this same percentage representation of these north american packaging net sales in 2011?
| 0.67385 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to consolidated financial statements gains and losses on financial assets and financial liabilities accounted for at fair value under the fair value option the table below presents the gains and losses recognized as a result of the firm electing to apply the fair value option to certain financial assets and financial liabilities . these gains and losses are included in 201cmarket making 201d and 201cother principal transactions . 201d the table below also includes gains and losses on the embedded derivative component of hybrid financial instruments included in unsecured short-term borrowings and unsecured long-term borrowings . these gains and losses would have been recognized under other u.s . gaap even if the firm had not elected to account for the entire hybrid instrument at fair value . the amounts in the table exclude contractual interest , which is included in 201cinterest income 201d and 201cinterest expense , 201d for all instruments other than hybrid financial instruments . see note 23 for further information about interest income and interest expense . gains/ ( losses ) on financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value under the fair value option year ended december in millions 2012 2011 2010 receivables from customers and counterparties 1 $ 190 $ 97 $ ( 97 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>gains/ ( losses ) on financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value under the fair value option year ended december 2012</td><td>gains/ ( losses ) on financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value under the fair value option year ended december 2011</td><td>gains/ ( losses ) on financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value under the fair value option year ended december 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>receivables from customers andcounterparties1</td><td>$ 190</td><td>$ 97</td><td>$ -97 ( 97 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other secured financings</td><td>-190 ( 190 )</td><td>-63 ( 63 )</td><td>-227 ( 227 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unsecured short-term borrowings2</td><td>-973 ( 973 )</td><td>2149</td><td>-1455 ( 1455 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unsecured long-term borrowings3</td><td>-1523 ( 1523 )</td><td>2336</td><td>-1169 ( 1169 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other liabilities and accrued expenses4</td><td>-1486 ( 1486 )</td><td>-911 ( 911 )</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other5</td><td>-81 ( 81 )</td><td>90</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ -4063 ( 4063 )</td><td>$ 3698</td><td>$ -2908 ( 2908 )</td></tr></table> 1 . primarily consists of gains/ ( losses ) on certain reinsurance contracts and certain transfers accounted for as receivables rather than purchases . 2 . includes gains/ ( losses ) on the embedded derivative component of hybrid financial instruments of $ ( 814 ) million , $ 2.01 billion , and $ ( 1.49 ) billion as of december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively . 3 . includes gains/ ( losses ) on the embedded derivative component of hybrid financial instruments of $ ( 887 ) million , $ 1.80 billion and $ ( 1.32 ) billion as of december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively . 4 . primarily consists of gains/ ( losses ) on certain insurance contracts . 5 . primarily consists of gains/ ( losses ) on resale and repurchase agreements , securities borrowed and loaned and deposits . excluding the gains and losses on the instruments accounted for under the fair value option described above , 201cmarket making 201d and 201cother principal transactions 201d primarily represent gains and losses on 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value 201d and 201cfinancial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , at fair value . 201d 150 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what was the change in the total gains/ ( losses ) on financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value from 2017 to 2018?
| -7761.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to consolidated financial statements gains and losses on financial assets and financial liabilities accounted for at fair value under the fair value option the table below presents the gains and losses recognized as a result of the firm electing to apply the fair value option to certain financial assets and financial liabilities . these gains and losses are included in 201cmarket making 201d and 201cother principal transactions . 201d the table below also includes gains and losses on the embedded derivative component of hybrid financial instruments included in unsecured short-term borrowings and unsecured long-term borrowings . these gains and losses would have been recognized under other u.s . gaap even if the firm had not elected to account for the entire hybrid instrument at fair value . the amounts in the table exclude contractual interest , which is included in 201cinterest income 201d and 201cinterest expense , 201d for all instruments other than hybrid financial instruments . see note 23 for further information about interest income and interest expense . gains/ ( losses ) on financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value under the fair value option year ended december in millions 2012 2011 2010 receivables from customers and counterparties 1 $ 190 $ 97 $ ( 97 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>gains/ ( losses ) on financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value under the fair value option year ended december 2012</td><td>gains/ ( losses ) on financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value under the fair value option year ended december 2011</td><td>gains/ ( losses ) on financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value under the fair value option year ended december 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>receivables from customers andcounterparties1</td><td>$ 190</td><td>$ 97</td><td>$ -97 ( 97 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>other secured financings</td><td>-190 ( 190 )</td><td>-63 ( 63 )</td><td>-227 ( 227 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unsecured short-term borrowings2</td><td>-973 ( 973 )</td><td>2149</td><td>-1455 ( 1455 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>unsecured long-term borrowings3</td><td>-1523 ( 1523 )</td><td>2336</td><td>-1169 ( 1169 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other liabilities and accrued expenses4</td><td>-1486 ( 1486 )</td><td>-911 ( 911 )</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other5</td><td>-81 ( 81 )</td><td>90</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ -4063 ( 4063 )</td><td>$ 3698</td><td>$ -2908 ( 2908 )</td></tr></table> 1 . primarily consists of gains/ ( losses ) on certain reinsurance contracts and certain transfers accounted for as receivables rather than purchases . 2 . includes gains/ ( losses ) on the embedded derivative component of hybrid financial instruments of $ ( 814 ) million , $ 2.01 billion , and $ ( 1.49 ) billion as of december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively . 3 . includes gains/ ( losses ) on the embedded derivative component of hybrid financial instruments of $ ( 887 ) million , $ 1.80 billion and $ ( 1.32 ) billion as of december 2012 , december 2011 and december 2010 , respectively . 4 . primarily consists of gains/ ( losses ) on certain insurance contracts . 5 . primarily consists of gains/ ( losses ) on resale and repurchase agreements , securities borrowed and loaned and deposits . excluding the gains and losses on the instruments accounted for under the fair value option described above , 201cmarket making 201d and 201cother principal transactions 201d primarily represent gains and losses on 201cfinancial instruments owned , at fair value 201d and 201cfinancial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , at fair value . 201d 150 goldman sachs 2012 annual report .
Question: what was the change in the total gains/ ( losses ) on financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: -7761.0
Question: and what was that change from 2016 to 2017?
| 6606.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report 59 consolidated results of operations this following section provides a comparative discussion of jpmorgan chase 2019s consolidated results of operations on a reported basis for the three-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . factors that related primarily to a single business segment are discussed in more detail within that business segment . for a discussion of the critical accounting estimates used by the firm that affect the consolidated results of operations , see pages 149 2013 154 of this annual report . revenue year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>investment banking fees</td><td>$ 6190</td><td>$ 7087</td><td>$ 5526</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>principal transactions</td><td>10894</td><td>9796</td><td>-10699 ( 10699 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lending- and deposit-related fees</td><td>6340</td><td>7045</td><td>5088</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>asset management administrationand commissions</td><td>13499</td><td>12540</td><td>13943</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>securities gains</td><td>2965</td><td>1110</td><td>1560</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>mortgage fees and related income</td><td>3870</td><td>3678</td><td>3467</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>credit card income</td><td>5891</td><td>7110</td><td>7419</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other income</td><td>2044</td><td>916</td><td>2169</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>noninterest revenue</td><td>51693</td><td>49282</td><td>28473</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>net interest income</td><td>51001</td><td>51152</td><td>38779</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total net revenue</td><td>$ 102694</td><td>$ 100434</td><td>$ 67252</td></tr></table> 2010 compared with 2009 total net revenue for 2010 was $ 102.7 billion , up by $ 2.3 billion , or 2% ( 2 % ) , from 2009 . results for 2010 were driven by a higher level of securities gains and private equity gains in corporate/private equity , higher asset management fees in am and administration fees in tss , and higher other income in several businesses , partially offset by lower credit card income . investment banking fees decreased from 2009 due to lower equity underwriting and advisory fees , partially offset by higher debt underwriting fees . competitive markets combined with flat industry-wide equity underwriting and completed m&a volumes , resulted in lower equity underwriting and advisory fees ; while strong industry-wide loan syndication and high-yield bond volumes drove record debt underwriting fees in ib . for additional information on investment banking fees , which are primarily recorded in ib , see ib segment results on pages 69 201371 of this annual report . principal transactions revenue , which consists of revenue from the firm 2019s trading and private equity investing activities , increased compared with 2009 . this was driven by the private equity business , which had significant private equity gains in 2010 , compared with a small loss in 2009 , reflecting improvements in market conditions . trading revenue decreased , reflecting lower results in corporate , offset by higher revenue in ib primarily reflecting gains from the widening of the firm 2019s credit spread on certain structured and derivative liabilities . for additional information on principal transactions revenue , see ib and corporate/private equity segment results on pages 69 201371 and 89 2013 90 , respectively , and note 7 on pages 199 2013200 of this annual report . lending- and deposit-related fees decreased in 2010 from 2009 levels , reflecting lower deposit-related fees in rfs associated , in part , with newly-enacted legislation related to non-sufficient funds and overdraft fees ; this was partially offset by higher lending- related service fees in ib , primarily from growth in business volume , and in cb , primarily from higher commitment and letter-of-credit fees . for additional information on lending- and deposit-related fees , which are mostly recorded in ib , rfs , cb and tss , see segment results for ib on pages 69 201371 , rfs on pages 72 201378 , cb on pages 82 201383 and tss on pages 84 201385 of this annual report . asset management , administration and commissions revenue increased from 2009 . the increase largely reflected higher asset management fees in am , driven by the effect of higher market levels , net inflows to products with higher margins and higher performance fees ; and higher administration fees in tss , reflecting the effects of higher market levels and net inflows of assets under custody . this increase was partially offset by lower brokerage commissions in ib , as a result of lower market volumes . for additional information on these fees and commissions , see the segment discussions for am on pages 86 201388 and tss on pages 84 201385 of this annual report . securities gains were significantly higher in 2010 compared with 2009 , resulting primarily from the repositioning of the portfolio in response to changes in the interest rate environment and to rebalance exposure . for additional information on securities gains , which are mostly recorded in the firm 2019s corporate segment , see the corporate/private equity segment discussion on pages 89 201390 of this annual report . mortgage fees and related income increased in 2010 compared with 2009 , driven by higher mortgage production revenue , reflecting increased mortgage origination volumes in rfs and am , and wider margins , particularly in rfs . this increase was largely offset by higher repurchase losses in rfs ( recorded as contra- revenue ) , which were attributable to higher estimated losses related to repurchase demands , predominantly from gses . for additional information on mortgage fees and related income , which is recorded primarily in rfs , see rfs 2019s mortgage banking , auto & other consumer lending discussion on pages 74 201377 of this annual report . for additional information on repurchase losses , see the repurchase liability discussion on pages 98 2013101 and note 30 on pages 275 2013280 of this annual report . credit card income decreased during 2010 , predominantly due to the impact of the accounting guidance related to vies , effective january 1 , 2010 , that required the firm to consolidate the assets and liabilities of its firm-sponsored credit card securitization trusts . adoption of the new guidance resulted in the elimination of all servicing fees received from firm-sponsored credit card securitization trusts ( which was offset by related increases in net .
Question: what portion ot total net revenue is generated by noninterest revenue in 2009?
| 0.49069 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report 59 consolidated results of operations this following section provides a comparative discussion of jpmorgan chase 2019s consolidated results of operations on a reported basis for the three-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . factors that related primarily to a single business segment are discussed in more detail within that business segment . for a discussion of the critical accounting estimates used by the firm that affect the consolidated results of operations , see pages 149 2013 154 of this annual report . revenue year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>investment banking fees</td><td>$ 6190</td><td>$ 7087</td><td>$ 5526</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>principal transactions</td><td>10894</td><td>9796</td><td>-10699 ( 10699 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lending- and deposit-related fees</td><td>6340</td><td>7045</td><td>5088</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>asset management administrationand commissions</td><td>13499</td><td>12540</td><td>13943</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>securities gains</td><td>2965</td><td>1110</td><td>1560</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>mortgage fees and related income</td><td>3870</td><td>3678</td><td>3467</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>credit card income</td><td>5891</td><td>7110</td><td>7419</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other income</td><td>2044</td><td>916</td><td>2169</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>noninterest revenue</td><td>51693</td><td>49282</td><td>28473</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>net interest income</td><td>51001</td><td>51152</td><td>38779</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total net revenue</td><td>$ 102694</td><td>$ 100434</td><td>$ 67252</td></tr></table> 2010 compared with 2009 total net revenue for 2010 was $ 102.7 billion , up by $ 2.3 billion , or 2% ( 2 % ) , from 2009 . results for 2010 were driven by a higher level of securities gains and private equity gains in corporate/private equity , higher asset management fees in am and administration fees in tss , and higher other income in several businesses , partially offset by lower credit card income . investment banking fees decreased from 2009 due to lower equity underwriting and advisory fees , partially offset by higher debt underwriting fees . competitive markets combined with flat industry-wide equity underwriting and completed m&a volumes , resulted in lower equity underwriting and advisory fees ; while strong industry-wide loan syndication and high-yield bond volumes drove record debt underwriting fees in ib . for additional information on investment banking fees , which are primarily recorded in ib , see ib segment results on pages 69 201371 of this annual report . principal transactions revenue , which consists of revenue from the firm 2019s trading and private equity investing activities , increased compared with 2009 . this was driven by the private equity business , which had significant private equity gains in 2010 , compared with a small loss in 2009 , reflecting improvements in market conditions . trading revenue decreased , reflecting lower results in corporate , offset by higher revenue in ib primarily reflecting gains from the widening of the firm 2019s credit spread on certain structured and derivative liabilities . for additional information on principal transactions revenue , see ib and corporate/private equity segment results on pages 69 201371 and 89 2013 90 , respectively , and note 7 on pages 199 2013200 of this annual report . lending- and deposit-related fees decreased in 2010 from 2009 levels , reflecting lower deposit-related fees in rfs associated , in part , with newly-enacted legislation related to non-sufficient funds and overdraft fees ; this was partially offset by higher lending- related service fees in ib , primarily from growth in business volume , and in cb , primarily from higher commitment and letter-of-credit fees . for additional information on lending- and deposit-related fees , which are mostly recorded in ib , rfs , cb and tss , see segment results for ib on pages 69 201371 , rfs on pages 72 201378 , cb on pages 82 201383 and tss on pages 84 201385 of this annual report . asset management , administration and commissions revenue increased from 2009 . the increase largely reflected higher asset management fees in am , driven by the effect of higher market levels , net inflows to products with higher margins and higher performance fees ; and higher administration fees in tss , reflecting the effects of higher market levels and net inflows of assets under custody . this increase was partially offset by lower brokerage commissions in ib , as a result of lower market volumes . for additional information on these fees and commissions , see the segment discussions for am on pages 86 201388 and tss on pages 84 201385 of this annual report . securities gains were significantly higher in 2010 compared with 2009 , resulting primarily from the repositioning of the portfolio in response to changes in the interest rate environment and to rebalance exposure . for additional information on securities gains , which are mostly recorded in the firm 2019s corporate segment , see the corporate/private equity segment discussion on pages 89 201390 of this annual report . mortgage fees and related income increased in 2010 compared with 2009 , driven by higher mortgage production revenue , reflecting increased mortgage origination volumes in rfs and am , and wider margins , particularly in rfs . this increase was largely offset by higher repurchase losses in rfs ( recorded as contra- revenue ) , which were attributable to higher estimated losses related to repurchase demands , predominantly from gses . for additional information on mortgage fees and related income , which is recorded primarily in rfs , see rfs 2019s mortgage banking , auto & other consumer lending discussion on pages 74 201377 of this annual report . for additional information on repurchase losses , see the repurchase liability discussion on pages 98 2013101 and note 30 on pages 275 2013280 of this annual report . credit card income decreased during 2010 , predominantly due to the impact of the accounting guidance related to vies , effective january 1 , 2010 , that required the firm to consolidate the assets and liabilities of its firm-sponsored credit card securitization trusts . adoption of the new guidance resulted in the elimination of all servicing fees received from firm-sponsored credit card securitization trusts ( which was offset by related increases in net .
Question: what portion ot total net revenue is generated by noninterest revenue in 2009?
Answer: 0.49069
Question: what is the noninterest revenue in 2010?
| 51693.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report 59 consolidated results of operations this following section provides a comparative discussion of jpmorgan chase 2019s consolidated results of operations on a reported basis for the three-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . factors that related primarily to a single business segment are discussed in more detail within that business segment . for a discussion of the critical accounting estimates used by the firm that affect the consolidated results of operations , see pages 149 2013 154 of this annual report . revenue year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>investment banking fees</td><td>$ 6190</td><td>$ 7087</td><td>$ 5526</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>principal transactions</td><td>10894</td><td>9796</td><td>-10699 ( 10699 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lending- and deposit-related fees</td><td>6340</td><td>7045</td><td>5088</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>asset management administrationand commissions</td><td>13499</td><td>12540</td><td>13943</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>securities gains</td><td>2965</td><td>1110</td><td>1560</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>mortgage fees and related income</td><td>3870</td><td>3678</td><td>3467</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>credit card income</td><td>5891</td><td>7110</td><td>7419</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other income</td><td>2044</td><td>916</td><td>2169</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>noninterest revenue</td><td>51693</td><td>49282</td><td>28473</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>net interest income</td><td>51001</td><td>51152</td><td>38779</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total net revenue</td><td>$ 102694</td><td>$ 100434</td><td>$ 67252</td></tr></table> 2010 compared with 2009 total net revenue for 2010 was $ 102.7 billion , up by $ 2.3 billion , or 2% ( 2 % ) , from 2009 . results for 2010 were driven by a higher level of securities gains and private equity gains in corporate/private equity , higher asset management fees in am and administration fees in tss , and higher other income in several businesses , partially offset by lower credit card income . investment banking fees decreased from 2009 due to lower equity underwriting and advisory fees , partially offset by higher debt underwriting fees . competitive markets combined with flat industry-wide equity underwriting and completed m&a volumes , resulted in lower equity underwriting and advisory fees ; while strong industry-wide loan syndication and high-yield bond volumes drove record debt underwriting fees in ib . for additional information on investment banking fees , which are primarily recorded in ib , see ib segment results on pages 69 201371 of this annual report . principal transactions revenue , which consists of revenue from the firm 2019s trading and private equity investing activities , increased compared with 2009 . this was driven by the private equity business , which had significant private equity gains in 2010 , compared with a small loss in 2009 , reflecting improvements in market conditions . trading revenue decreased , reflecting lower results in corporate , offset by higher revenue in ib primarily reflecting gains from the widening of the firm 2019s credit spread on certain structured and derivative liabilities . for additional information on principal transactions revenue , see ib and corporate/private equity segment results on pages 69 201371 and 89 2013 90 , respectively , and note 7 on pages 199 2013200 of this annual report . lending- and deposit-related fees decreased in 2010 from 2009 levels , reflecting lower deposit-related fees in rfs associated , in part , with newly-enacted legislation related to non-sufficient funds and overdraft fees ; this was partially offset by higher lending- related service fees in ib , primarily from growth in business volume , and in cb , primarily from higher commitment and letter-of-credit fees . for additional information on lending- and deposit-related fees , which are mostly recorded in ib , rfs , cb and tss , see segment results for ib on pages 69 201371 , rfs on pages 72 201378 , cb on pages 82 201383 and tss on pages 84 201385 of this annual report . asset management , administration and commissions revenue increased from 2009 . the increase largely reflected higher asset management fees in am , driven by the effect of higher market levels , net inflows to products with higher margins and higher performance fees ; and higher administration fees in tss , reflecting the effects of higher market levels and net inflows of assets under custody . this increase was partially offset by lower brokerage commissions in ib , as a result of lower market volumes . for additional information on these fees and commissions , see the segment discussions for am on pages 86 201388 and tss on pages 84 201385 of this annual report . securities gains were significantly higher in 2010 compared with 2009 , resulting primarily from the repositioning of the portfolio in response to changes in the interest rate environment and to rebalance exposure . for additional information on securities gains , which are mostly recorded in the firm 2019s corporate segment , see the corporate/private equity segment discussion on pages 89 201390 of this annual report . mortgage fees and related income increased in 2010 compared with 2009 , driven by higher mortgage production revenue , reflecting increased mortgage origination volumes in rfs and am , and wider margins , particularly in rfs . this increase was largely offset by higher repurchase losses in rfs ( recorded as contra- revenue ) , which were attributable to higher estimated losses related to repurchase demands , predominantly from gses . for additional information on mortgage fees and related income , which is recorded primarily in rfs , see rfs 2019s mortgage banking , auto & other consumer lending discussion on pages 74 201377 of this annual report . for additional information on repurchase losses , see the repurchase liability discussion on pages 98 2013101 and note 30 on pages 275 2013280 of this annual report . credit card income decreased during 2010 , predominantly due to the impact of the accounting guidance related to vies , effective january 1 , 2010 , that required the firm to consolidate the assets and liabilities of its firm-sponsored credit card securitization trusts . adoption of the new guidance resulted in the elimination of all servicing fees received from firm-sponsored credit card securitization trusts ( which was offset by related increases in net .
Question: what portion ot total net revenue is generated by noninterest revenue in 2009?
Answer: 0.49069
Question: what is the noninterest revenue in 2010?
Answer: 51693.0
Question: what about the total net revenue?
| 102694.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report 59 consolidated results of operations this following section provides a comparative discussion of jpmorgan chase 2019s consolidated results of operations on a reported basis for the three-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . factors that related primarily to a single business segment are discussed in more detail within that business segment . for a discussion of the critical accounting estimates used by the firm that affect the consolidated results of operations , see pages 149 2013 154 of this annual report . revenue year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2010 2009 2008 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>investment banking fees</td><td>$ 6190</td><td>$ 7087</td><td>$ 5526</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>principal transactions</td><td>10894</td><td>9796</td><td>-10699 ( 10699 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lending- and deposit-related fees</td><td>6340</td><td>7045</td><td>5088</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>asset management administrationand commissions</td><td>13499</td><td>12540</td><td>13943</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>securities gains</td><td>2965</td><td>1110</td><td>1560</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>mortgage fees and related income</td><td>3870</td><td>3678</td><td>3467</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>credit card income</td><td>5891</td><td>7110</td><td>7419</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other income</td><td>2044</td><td>916</td><td>2169</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>noninterest revenue</td><td>51693</td><td>49282</td><td>28473</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>net interest income</td><td>51001</td><td>51152</td><td>38779</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>total net revenue</td><td>$ 102694</td><td>$ 100434</td><td>$ 67252</td></tr></table> 2010 compared with 2009 total net revenue for 2010 was $ 102.7 billion , up by $ 2.3 billion , or 2% ( 2 % ) , from 2009 . results for 2010 were driven by a higher level of securities gains and private equity gains in corporate/private equity , higher asset management fees in am and administration fees in tss , and higher other income in several businesses , partially offset by lower credit card income . investment banking fees decreased from 2009 due to lower equity underwriting and advisory fees , partially offset by higher debt underwriting fees . competitive markets combined with flat industry-wide equity underwriting and completed m&a volumes , resulted in lower equity underwriting and advisory fees ; while strong industry-wide loan syndication and high-yield bond volumes drove record debt underwriting fees in ib . for additional information on investment banking fees , which are primarily recorded in ib , see ib segment results on pages 69 201371 of this annual report . principal transactions revenue , which consists of revenue from the firm 2019s trading and private equity investing activities , increased compared with 2009 . this was driven by the private equity business , which had significant private equity gains in 2010 , compared with a small loss in 2009 , reflecting improvements in market conditions . trading revenue decreased , reflecting lower results in corporate , offset by higher revenue in ib primarily reflecting gains from the widening of the firm 2019s credit spread on certain structured and derivative liabilities . for additional information on principal transactions revenue , see ib and corporate/private equity segment results on pages 69 201371 and 89 2013 90 , respectively , and note 7 on pages 199 2013200 of this annual report . lending- and deposit-related fees decreased in 2010 from 2009 levels , reflecting lower deposit-related fees in rfs associated , in part , with newly-enacted legislation related to non-sufficient funds and overdraft fees ; this was partially offset by higher lending- related service fees in ib , primarily from growth in business volume , and in cb , primarily from higher commitment and letter-of-credit fees . for additional information on lending- and deposit-related fees , which are mostly recorded in ib , rfs , cb and tss , see segment results for ib on pages 69 201371 , rfs on pages 72 201378 , cb on pages 82 201383 and tss on pages 84 201385 of this annual report . asset management , administration and commissions revenue increased from 2009 . the increase largely reflected higher asset management fees in am , driven by the effect of higher market levels , net inflows to products with higher margins and higher performance fees ; and higher administration fees in tss , reflecting the effects of higher market levels and net inflows of assets under custody . this increase was partially offset by lower brokerage commissions in ib , as a result of lower market volumes . for additional information on these fees and commissions , see the segment discussions for am on pages 86 201388 and tss on pages 84 201385 of this annual report . securities gains were significantly higher in 2010 compared with 2009 , resulting primarily from the repositioning of the portfolio in response to changes in the interest rate environment and to rebalance exposure . for additional information on securities gains , which are mostly recorded in the firm 2019s corporate segment , see the corporate/private equity segment discussion on pages 89 201390 of this annual report . mortgage fees and related income increased in 2010 compared with 2009 , driven by higher mortgage production revenue , reflecting increased mortgage origination volumes in rfs and am , and wider margins , particularly in rfs . this increase was largely offset by higher repurchase losses in rfs ( recorded as contra- revenue ) , which were attributable to higher estimated losses related to repurchase demands , predominantly from gses . for additional information on mortgage fees and related income , which is recorded primarily in rfs , see rfs 2019s mortgage banking , auto & other consumer lending discussion on pages 74 201377 of this annual report . for additional information on repurchase losses , see the repurchase liability discussion on pages 98 2013101 and note 30 on pages 275 2013280 of this annual report . credit card income decreased during 2010 , predominantly due to the impact of the accounting guidance related to vies , effective january 1 , 2010 , that required the firm to consolidate the assets and liabilities of its firm-sponsored credit card securitization trusts . adoption of the new guidance resulted in the elimination of all servicing fees received from firm-sponsored credit card securitization trusts ( which was offset by related increases in net .
Question: what portion ot total net revenue is generated by noninterest revenue in 2009?
Answer: 0.49069
Question: what is the noninterest revenue in 2010?
Answer: 51693.0
Question: what about the total net revenue?
Answer: 102694.0
Question: what portion is generated by noninterest revenue?
| 0.50337 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of an adverse liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and geopolitical and macroeconomic conditions . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company-specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons and over different stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal liquidity stress metrics that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . pursuant to the federal reserve board 2019s final rule regarding lcr disclosures , effective april 1 , 2017 , citi began to disclose lcr in the prescribed format . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2017</td><td>sept . 30 2017</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 446.4</td><td>$ 448.6</td><td>$ 403.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>364.3</td><td>365.1</td><td>332.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 82.1</td><td>$ 83.5</td><td>$ 71.3</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased year- over-year , as the increase in the hqla ( as discussed above ) more than offset an increase in modeled net outflows . the increase in modeled net outflows was primarily driven by changes in assumptions , including changes in methodology to better align citi 2019s outflow assumptions with those embedded in its resolution planning . sequentially , citi 2019s lcr remained unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . prescribed factors would be required to be applied to the various categories of asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2017 , it will need to evaluate a final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2018 . citi expects that the nsfr final rules implementation period will be communicated along with the final version of the rules. .
Question: what was the hqla in excess of net outflows at the end of 2017?
| 82.1 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of an adverse liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and geopolitical and macroeconomic conditions . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company-specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons and over different stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal liquidity stress metrics that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . pursuant to the federal reserve board 2019s final rule regarding lcr disclosures , effective april 1 , 2017 , citi began to disclose lcr in the prescribed format . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2017</td><td>sept . 30 2017</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 446.4</td><td>$ 448.6</td><td>$ 403.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>364.3</td><td>365.1</td><td>332.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 82.1</td><td>$ 83.5</td><td>$ 71.3</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased year- over-year , as the increase in the hqla ( as discussed above ) more than offset an increase in modeled net outflows . the increase in modeled net outflows was primarily driven by changes in assumptions , including changes in methodology to better align citi 2019s outflow assumptions with those embedded in its resolution planning . sequentially , citi 2019s lcr remained unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . prescribed factors would be required to be applied to the various categories of asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2017 , it will need to evaluate a final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2018 . citi expects that the nsfr final rules implementation period will be communicated along with the final version of the rules. .
Question: what was the hqla in excess of net outflows at the end of 2017?
Answer: 82.1
Question: what was the balance at the end of 2016?
| 71.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of an adverse liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and geopolitical and macroeconomic conditions . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company-specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons and over different stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal liquidity stress metrics that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . pursuant to the federal reserve board 2019s final rule regarding lcr disclosures , effective april 1 , 2017 , citi began to disclose lcr in the prescribed format . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2017</td><td>sept . 30 2017</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 446.4</td><td>$ 448.6</td><td>$ 403.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>364.3</td><td>365.1</td><td>332.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 82.1</td><td>$ 83.5</td><td>$ 71.3</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased year- over-year , as the increase in the hqla ( as discussed above ) more than offset an increase in modeled net outflows . the increase in modeled net outflows was primarily driven by changes in assumptions , including changes in methodology to better align citi 2019s outflow assumptions with those embedded in its resolution planning . sequentially , citi 2019s lcr remained unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . prescribed factors would be required to be applied to the various categories of asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2017 , it will need to evaluate a final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2018 . citi expects that the nsfr final rules implementation period will be communicated along with the final version of the rules. .
Question: what was the hqla in excess of net outflows at the end of 2017?
Answer: 82.1
Question: what was the balance at the end of 2016?
Answer: 71.3
Question: what is the net difference?
| 10.8 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of an adverse liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and geopolitical and macroeconomic conditions . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company-specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons and over different stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal liquidity stress metrics that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . pursuant to the federal reserve board 2019s final rule regarding lcr disclosures , effective april 1 , 2017 , citi began to disclose lcr in the prescribed format . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2017</td><td>sept . 30 2017</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 446.4</td><td>$ 448.6</td><td>$ 403.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>364.3</td><td>365.1</td><td>332.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 82.1</td><td>$ 83.5</td><td>$ 71.3</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased year- over-year , as the increase in the hqla ( as discussed above ) more than offset an increase in modeled net outflows . the increase in modeled net outflows was primarily driven by changes in assumptions , including changes in methodology to better align citi 2019s outflow assumptions with those embedded in its resolution planning . sequentially , citi 2019s lcr remained unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . prescribed factors would be required to be applied to the various categories of asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2017 , it will need to evaluate a final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2018 . citi expects that the nsfr final rules implementation period will be communicated along with the final version of the rules. .
Question: what was the hqla in excess of net outflows at the end of 2017?
Answer: 82.1
Question: what was the balance at the end of 2016?
Answer: 71.3
Question: what is the net difference?
Answer: 10.8
Question: what was the starting value?
| 71.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of an adverse liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and geopolitical and macroeconomic conditions . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company-specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons and over different stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal liquidity stress metrics that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . pursuant to the federal reserve board 2019s final rule regarding lcr disclosures , effective april 1 , 2017 , citi began to disclose lcr in the prescribed format . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2017</td><td>sept . 30 2017</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 446.4</td><td>$ 448.6</td><td>$ 403.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>364.3</td><td>365.1</td><td>332.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 82.1</td><td>$ 83.5</td><td>$ 71.3</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased year- over-year , as the increase in the hqla ( as discussed above ) more than offset an increase in modeled net outflows . the increase in modeled net outflows was primarily driven by changes in assumptions , including changes in methodology to better align citi 2019s outflow assumptions with those embedded in its resolution planning . sequentially , citi 2019s lcr remained unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . prescribed factors would be required to be applied to the various categories of asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2017 , it will need to evaluate a final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2018 . citi expects that the nsfr final rules implementation period will be communicated along with the final version of the rules. .
Question: what was the hqla in excess of net outflows at the end of 2017?
Answer: 82.1
Question: what was the balance at the end of 2016?
Answer: 71.3
Question: what is the net difference?
Answer: 10.8
Question: what was the starting value?
Answer: 71.3
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.15147 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 . the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 208.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base rates</td><td>10.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>8.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2004 deferrals</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>price applied to unbilled electric sales</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2004 net revenue</td><td>$ 239.0</td></tr></table> the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 . the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector . the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors . the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 . the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset . the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively . the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. .
Question: what was the 2004 net revenue?
| 239.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 . the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 208.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base rates</td><td>10.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>8.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2004 deferrals</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>price applied to unbilled electric sales</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2004 net revenue</td><td>$ 239.0</td></tr></table> the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 . the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector . the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors . the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 . the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset . the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively . the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. .
Question: what was the 2004 net revenue?
Answer: 239.0
Question: what was the 2003 net revenue?
| 208.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 . the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 208.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base rates</td><td>10.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>8.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2004 deferrals</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>price applied to unbilled electric sales</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2004 net revenue</td><td>$ 239.0</td></tr></table> the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 . the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector . the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors . the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 . the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset . the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively . the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. .
Question: what was the 2004 net revenue?
Answer: 239.0
Question: what was the 2003 net revenue?
Answer: 208.3
Question: what was the difference?
| 30.7 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 . the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 208.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base rates</td><td>10.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>8.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2004 deferrals</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>price applied to unbilled electric sales</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2004 net revenue</td><td>$ 239.0</td></tr></table> the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 . the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector . the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors . the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 . the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset . the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively . the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. .
Question: what was the 2004 net revenue?
Answer: 239.0
Question: what was the 2003 net revenue?
Answer: 208.3
Question: what was the difference?
Answer: 30.7
Question: what was the value for volume/weather?
| 8.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 . the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 208.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base rates</td><td>10.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>8.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2004 deferrals</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>price applied to unbilled electric sales</td><td>3.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>0.6</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2004 net revenue</td><td>$ 239.0</td></tr></table> the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 . the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector . the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors . the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 . the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset . the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively . the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. .
Question: what was the 2004 net revenue?
Answer: 239.0
Question: what was the 2003 net revenue?
Answer: 208.3
Question: what was the difference?
Answer: 30.7
Question: what was the value for volume/weather?
Answer: 8.3
Question: what is the ratio of volume/weather to the difference in revenue?
| 0.27036 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
guaranteed by the company with guarantees from the joint venture partners for their proportionate amounts of any guaranty payment the company is obligated to make ( see guarantee table above ) . non-recourse mortgage debt is generally defined as debt whereby the lenders 2019 sole recourse with respect to borrower defaults is limited to the value of the property collateralized by the mortgage . the lender generally does not have recourse against any other assets owned by the borrower or any of the constituent members of the borrower , except for certain specified exceptions listed in the particular loan documents ( see footnote 7 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k ) . these investments include the following joint ventures : venture ownership interest number of properties total gla thousands ) recourse mortgage payable ( in millions ) number of encumbered properties average interest weighted average ( months ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>venture</td><td>kimco ownership interest</td><td>number of properties</td><td>total gla ( in thousands )</td><td>non- recourse mortgage payable ( in millions )</td><td>number of encumbered properties</td><td>average interest rate</td><td>weighted average term ( months )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>kimpru ( a )</td><td>15.0% ( 15.0 % )</td><td>60</td><td>10573</td><td>$ 920.4</td><td>39</td><td>5.53% ( 5.53 % )</td><td>23.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>riocan venture ( b )</td><td>50.0% ( 50.0 % )</td><td>45</td><td>9307</td><td>$ 642.6</td><td>28</td><td>4.29% ( 4.29 % )</td><td>39.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>kir ( c )</td><td>48.6% ( 48.6 % )</td><td>54</td><td>11519</td><td>$ 866.4</td><td>46</td><td>5.04% ( 5.04 % )</td><td>61.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>big shopping centers ( d )</td><td>50.1% ( 50.1 % )</td><td>6</td><td>1029</td><td>$ 144.6</td><td>6</td><td>5.52% ( 5.52 % )</td><td>22.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>kimstone ( e ) ( g )</td><td>33.3% ( 33.3 % )</td><td>39</td><td>5595</td><td>$ 704.4</td><td>38</td><td>4.45% ( 4.45 % )</td><td>28.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>cpp ( f )</td><td>55.0% ( 55.0 % )</td><td>7</td><td>2425</td><td>$ 112.1</td><td>2</td><td>5.05% ( 5.05 % )</td><td>10.1</td></tr></table> ( a ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with prudential real estate investors . ( b ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with riocan real estate investment trust . ( c ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with certain institutional investors . ( d ) represents the company 2019s remaining joint venture with big shopping centers ( tlv:big ) , an israeli public company ( see footnote 7 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k ) . ( e ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with blackstone . ( f ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with the canadian pension plan investment board ( cppib ) . ( g ) on february 2 , 2015 , the company purchased the remaining 66.7% ( 66.7 % ) interest in the 39-property kimstone portfolio for a gross purchase price of $ 1.4 billion , including the assumption of $ 638.0 million in mortgage debt ( see footnote 26 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k ) . the company has various other unconsolidated real estate joint ventures with varying structures . as of december 31 , 2014 , these other unconsolidated joint ventures had individual non-recourse mortgage loans aggregating $ 1.2 billion . the aggregate debt as of december 31 , 2014 , of all of the company 2019s unconsolidated real estate joint ventures is $ 4.6 billion , of which the company 2019s proportionate share of this debt is $ 1.8 billion . as of december 31 , 2014 , these loans had scheduled maturities ranging from one month to 19 years and bear interest at rates ranging from 1.92% ( 1.92 % ) to 8.39% ( 8.39 % ) . approximately $ 525.7 million of the aggregate outstanding loan balance matures in 2015 , of which the company 2019s proportionate share is $ 206.0 million . these maturing loans are anticipated to be repaid with operating cash flows , debt refinancing and partner capital contributions , as deemed appropriate ( see footnote 7 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k ) . .
Question: as of december 31, 2014, what was the company 2019s proportionate share of debt from the aggregate debt of all unconsolidated real estate joint ventures?
| 1.8 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
guaranteed by the company with guarantees from the joint venture partners for their proportionate amounts of any guaranty payment the company is obligated to make ( see guarantee table above ) . non-recourse mortgage debt is generally defined as debt whereby the lenders 2019 sole recourse with respect to borrower defaults is limited to the value of the property collateralized by the mortgage . the lender generally does not have recourse against any other assets owned by the borrower or any of the constituent members of the borrower , except for certain specified exceptions listed in the particular loan documents ( see footnote 7 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k ) . these investments include the following joint ventures : venture ownership interest number of properties total gla thousands ) recourse mortgage payable ( in millions ) number of encumbered properties average interest weighted average ( months ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>venture</td><td>kimco ownership interest</td><td>number of properties</td><td>total gla ( in thousands )</td><td>non- recourse mortgage payable ( in millions )</td><td>number of encumbered properties</td><td>average interest rate</td><td>weighted average term ( months )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>kimpru ( a )</td><td>15.0% ( 15.0 % )</td><td>60</td><td>10573</td><td>$ 920.4</td><td>39</td><td>5.53% ( 5.53 % )</td><td>23.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>riocan venture ( b )</td><td>50.0% ( 50.0 % )</td><td>45</td><td>9307</td><td>$ 642.6</td><td>28</td><td>4.29% ( 4.29 % )</td><td>39.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>kir ( c )</td><td>48.6% ( 48.6 % )</td><td>54</td><td>11519</td><td>$ 866.4</td><td>46</td><td>5.04% ( 5.04 % )</td><td>61.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>big shopping centers ( d )</td><td>50.1% ( 50.1 % )</td><td>6</td><td>1029</td><td>$ 144.6</td><td>6</td><td>5.52% ( 5.52 % )</td><td>22.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>kimstone ( e ) ( g )</td><td>33.3% ( 33.3 % )</td><td>39</td><td>5595</td><td>$ 704.4</td><td>38</td><td>4.45% ( 4.45 % )</td><td>28.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>cpp ( f )</td><td>55.0% ( 55.0 % )</td><td>7</td><td>2425</td><td>$ 112.1</td><td>2</td><td>5.05% ( 5.05 % )</td><td>10.1</td></tr></table> ( a ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with prudential real estate investors . ( b ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with riocan real estate investment trust . ( c ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with certain institutional investors . ( d ) represents the company 2019s remaining joint venture with big shopping centers ( tlv:big ) , an israeli public company ( see footnote 7 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k ) . ( e ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with blackstone . ( f ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with the canadian pension plan investment board ( cppib ) . ( g ) on february 2 , 2015 , the company purchased the remaining 66.7% ( 66.7 % ) interest in the 39-property kimstone portfolio for a gross purchase price of $ 1.4 billion , including the assumption of $ 638.0 million in mortgage debt ( see footnote 26 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k ) . the company has various other unconsolidated real estate joint ventures with varying structures . as of december 31 , 2014 , these other unconsolidated joint ventures had individual non-recourse mortgage loans aggregating $ 1.2 billion . the aggregate debt as of december 31 , 2014 , of all of the company 2019s unconsolidated real estate joint ventures is $ 4.6 billion , of which the company 2019s proportionate share of this debt is $ 1.8 billion . as of december 31 , 2014 , these loans had scheduled maturities ranging from one month to 19 years and bear interest at rates ranging from 1.92% ( 1.92 % ) to 8.39% ( 8.39 % ) . approximately $ 525.7 million of the aggregate outstanding loan balance matures in 2015 , of which the company 2019s proportionate share is $ 206.0 million . these maturing loans are anticipated to be repaid with operating cash flows , debt refinancing and partner capital contributions , as deemed appropriate ( see footnote 7 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k ) . .
Question: as of december 31, 2014, what was the company 2019s proportionate share of debt from the aggregate debt of all unconsolidated real estate joint ventures?
Answer: 1.8
Question: and what was that aggregate debt?
| 4.6 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
guaranteed by the company with guarantees from the joint venture partners for their proportionate amounts of any guaranty payment the company is obligated to make ( see guarantee table above ) . non-recourse mortgage debt is generally defined as debt whereby the lenders 2019 sole recourse with respect to borrower defaults is limited to the value of the property collateralized by the mortgage . the lender generally does not have recourse against any other assets owned by the borrower or any of the constituent members of the borrower , except for certain specified exceptions listed in the particular loan documents ( see footnote 7 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k ) . these investments include the following joint ventures : venture ownership interest number of properties total gla thousands ) recourse mortgage payable ( in millions ) number of encumbered properties average interest weighted average ( months ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>venture</td><td>kimco ownership interest</td><td>number of properties</td><td>total gla ( in thousands )</td><td>non- recourse mortgage payable ( in millions )</td><td>number of encumbered properties</td><td>average interest rate</td><td>weighted average term ( months )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>kimpru ( a )</td><td>15.0% ( 15.0 % )</td><td>60</td><td>10573</td><td>$ 920.4</td><td>39</td><td>5.53% ( 5.53 % )</td><td>23.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>riocan venture ( b )</td><td>50.0% ( 50.0 % )</td><td>45</td><td>9307</td><td>$ 642.6</td><td>28</td><td>4.29% ( 4.29 % )</td><td>39.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>kir ( c )</td><td>48.6% ( 48.6 % )</td><td>54</td><td>11519</td><td>$ 866.4</td><td>46</td><td>5.04% ( 5.04 % )</td><td>61.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>big shopping centers ( d )</td><td>50.1% ( 50.1 % )</td><td>6</td><td>1029</td><td>$ 144.6</td><td>6</td><td>5.52% ( 5.52 % )</td><td>22.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>kimstone ( e ) ( g )</td><td>33.3% ( 33.3 % )</td><td>39</td><td>5595</td><td>$ 704.4</td><td>38</td><td>4.45% ( 4.45 % )</td><td>28.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>cpp ( f )</td><td>55.0% ( 55.0 % )</td><td>7</td><td>2425</td><td>$ 112.1</td><td>2</td><td>5.05% ( 5.05 % )</td><td>10.1</td></tr></table> ( a ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with prudential real estate investors . ( b ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with riocan real estate investment trust . ( c ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with certain institutional investors . ( d ) represents the company 2019s remaining joint venture with big shopping centers ( tlv:big ) , an israeli public company ( see footnote 7 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k ) . ( e ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with blackstone . ( f ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with the canadian pension plan investment board ( cppib ) . ( g ) on february 2 , 2015 , the company purchased the remaining 66.7% ( 66.7 % ) interest in the 39-property kimstone portfolio for a gross purchase price of $ 1.4 billion , including the assumption of $ 638.0 million in mortgage debt ( see footnote 26 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k ) . the company has various other unconsolidated real estate joint ventures with varying structures . as of december 31 , 2014 , these other unconsolidated joint ventures had individual non-recourse mortgage loans aggregating $ 1.2 billion . the aggregate debt as of december 31 , 2014 , of all of the company 2019s unconsolidated real estate joint ventures is $ 4.6 billion , of which the company 2019s proportionate share of this debt is $ 1.8 billion . as of december 31 , 2014 , these loans had scheduled maturities ranging from one month to 19 years and bear interest at rates ranging from 1.92% ( 1.92 % ) to 8.39% ( 8.39 % ) . approximately $ 525.7 million of the aggregate outstanding loan balance matures in 2015 , of which the company 2019s proportionate share is $ 206.0 million . these maturing loans are anticipated to be repaid with operating cash flows , debt refinancing and partner capital contributions , as deemed appropriate ( see footnote 7 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k ) . .
Question: as of december 31, 2014, what was the company 2019s proportionate share of debt from the aggregate debt of all unconsolidated real estate joint ventures?
Answer: 1.8
Question: and what was that aggregate debt?
Answer: 4.6
Question: what portion, then, of this aggregate debt did that proportional share one represent?
| 0.3913 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
guaranteed by the company with guarantees from the joint venture partners for their proportionate amounts of any guaranty payment the company is obligated to make ( see guarantee table above ) . non-recourse mortgage debt is generally defined as debt whereby the lenders 2019 sole recourse with respect to borrower defaults is limited to the value of the property collateralized by the mortgage . the lender generally does not have recourse against any other assets owned by the borrower or any of the constituent members of the borrower , except for certain specified exceptions listed in the particular loan documents ( see footnote 7 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k ) . these investments include the following joint ventures : venture ownership interest number of properties total gla thousands ) recourse mortgage payable ( in millions ) number of encumbered properties average interest weighted average ( months ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>venture</td><td>kimco ownership interest</td><td>number of properties</td><td>total gla ( in thousands )</td><td>non- recourse mortgage payable ( in millions )</td><td>number of encumbered properties</td><td>average interest rate</td><td>weighted average term ( months )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>kimpru ( a )</td><td>15.0% ( 15.0 % )</td><td>60</td><td>10573</td><td>$ 920.4</td><td>39</td><td>5.53% ( 5.53 % )</td><td>23.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>riocan venture ( b )</td><td>50.0% ( 50.0 % )</td><td>45</td><td>9307</td><td>$ 642.6</td><td>28</td><td>4.29% ( 4.29 % )</td><td>39.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>kir ( c )</td><td>48.6% ( 48.6 % )</td><td>54</td><td>11519</td><td>$ 866.4</td><td>46</td><td>5.04% ( 5.04 % )</td><td>61.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>big shopping centers ( d )</td><td>50.1% ( 50.1 % )</td><td>6</td><td>1029</td><td>$ 144.6</td><td>6</td><td>5.52% ( 5.52 % )</td><td>22.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>kimstone ( e ) ( g )</td><td>33.3% ( 33.3 % )</td><td>39</td><td>5595</td><td>$ 704.4</td><td>38</td><td>4.45% ( 4.45 % )</td><td>28.7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>cpp ( f )</td><td>55.0% ( 55.0 % )</td><td>7</td><td>2425</td><td>$ 112.1</td><td>2</td><td>5.05% ( 5.05 % )</td><td>10.1</td></tr></table> ( a ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with prudential real estate investors . ( b ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with riocan real estate investment trust . ( c ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with certain institutional investors . ( d ) represents the company 2019s remaining joint venture with big shopping centers ( tlv:big ) , an israeli public company ( see footnote 7 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k ) . ( e ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with blackstone . ( f ) represents the company 2019s joint ventures with the canadian pension plan investment board ( cppib ) . ( g ) on february 2 , 2015 , the company purchased the remaining 66.7% ( 66.7 % ) interest in the 39-property kimstone portfolio for a gross purchase price of $ 1.4 billion , including the assumption of $ 638.0 million in mortgage debt ( see footnote 26 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k ) . the company has various other unconsolidated real estate joint ventures with varying structures . as of december 31 , 2014 , these other unconsolidated joint ventures had individual non-recourse mortgage loans aggregating $ 1.2 billion . the aggregate debt as of december 31 , 2014 , of all of the company 2019s unconsolidated real estate joint ventures is $ 4.6 billion , of which the company 2019s proportionate share of this debt is $ 1.8 billion . as of december 31 , 2014 , these loans had scheduled maturities ranging from one month to 19 years and bear interest at rates ranging from 1.92% ( 1.92 % ) to 8.39% ( 8.39 % ) . approximately $ 525.7 million of the aggregate outstanding loan balance matures in 2015 , of which the company 2019s proportionate share is $ 206.0 million . these maturing loans are anticipated to be repaid with operating cash flows , debt refinancing and partner capital contributions , as deemed appropriate ( see footnote 7 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this form 10-k ) . .
Question: as of december 31, 2014, what was the company 2019s proportionate share of debt from the aggregate debt of all unconsolidated real estate joint ventures?
Answer: 1.8
Question: and what was that aggregate debt?
Answer: 4.6
Question: what portion, then, of this aggregate debt did that proportional share one represent?
Answer: 0.3913
Question: and what was the combined total of both debts, in billions?
| 6.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 65 liquidity and capital management liquidity risk has two fundamental components . the first is potential loss assuming we were unable to meet our funding requirements at a reasonable cost . the second is the potential inability to operate our businesses because adequate contingent liquidity is not available . we manage liquidity risk at the consolidated company level ( bank , parent company and nonbank subsidiaries combined ) to help ensure that we can obtain cost-effective funding to meet current and future obligations under both normal 201cbusiness as usual 201d and stressful circumstances , and to help ensure that we maintain an appropriate level of contingent liquidity . management monitors liquidity through a series of early warning indicators that may indicate a potential market , or pnc-specific , liquidity stress event . in addition , management performs a set of liquidity stress tests over multiple time horizons with varying levels of severity and maintains a contingency funding plan to address a potential liquidity stress event . in the most severe liquidity stress simulation , we assume that our liquidity position is under pressure , while the market in general is under systemic pressure . the simulation considers , among other things , the impact of restricted access to both secured and unsecured external sources of funding , accelerated run-off of customer deposits , valuation pressure on assets and heavy demand to fund committed obligations . parent company liquidity guidelines are designed to help ensure that sufficient liquidity is available to meet our parent company obligations over the succeeding 24-month period . liquidity-related risk limits are established within our enterprise liquidity management policy and supporting policies . management committees , including the asset and liability committee , and the board of directors and its risk committee regularly review compliance with key established limits . in addition to these liquidity monitoring measures and tools described above , we also monitor our liquidity by reference to the liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) which is further described in the supervision and regulation section in item 1 of this report . pnc and pnc bank calculate the lcr on a daily basis and as of december 31 , 2018 , the lcr for pnc and pnc bank exceeded the fully phased-in requirement of 100% ( 100 % ) . we provide additional information regarding regulatory liquidity requirements and their potential impact on us in the supervision and regulation section of item 1 business and item 1a risk factors of this report . sources of liquidity our largest source of liquidity on a consolidated basis is the customer deposit base generated by our banking businesses . these deposits provide relatively stable and low-cost funding . total deposits increased to $ 267.8 billion at december 31 , 2018 from $ 265.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 driven by growth in interest-bearing deposits partially offset by a decrease in noninterest-bearing deposits . see the funding sources section of the consolidated balance sheet review in this report for additional information related to our deposits . additionally , certain assets determined by us to be liquid as well as unused borrowing capacity from a number of sources are also available to manage our liquidity position . at december 31 , 2018 , our liquid assets consisted of short-term investments ( federal funds sold , resale agreements , trading securities and interest-earning deposits with banks ) totaling $ 22.1 billion and securities available for sale totaling $ 63.4 billion . the level of liquid assets fluctuates over time based on many factors , including market conditions , loan and deposit growth and balance sheet management activities . our liquid assets included $ 2.7 billion of securities available for sale and trading securities pledged as collateral to secure public and trust deposits , repurchase agreements and for other purposes . in addition , $ 4.9 billion of securities held to maturity were also pledged as collateral for these purposes . we also obtain liquidity through various forms of funding , including long-term debt ( senior notes , subordinated debt and fhlb borrowings ) and short-term borrowings ( securities sold under repurchase agreements , commercial paper and other short-term borrowings ) . see note 10 borrowed funds and the funding sources section of the consolidated balance sheet review in this report for additional information related to our borrowings . total senior and subordinated debt , on a consolidated basis , decreased due to the following activity : table 24 : senior and subordinated debt . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 33.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>issuances</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>calls and maturities</td><td>-6.8 ( 6.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>-.1 ( .1 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 30.9</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of liquid assets?
| 22.1 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 65 liquidity and capital management liquidity risk has two fundamental components . the first is potential loss assuming we were unable to meet our funding requirements at a reasonable cost . the second is the potential inability to operate our businesses because adequate contingent liquidity is not available . we manage liquidity risk at the consolidated company level ( bank , parent company and nonbank subsidiaries combined ) to help ensure that we can obtain cost-effective funding to meet current and future obligations under both normal 201cbusiness as usual 201d and stressful circumstances , and to help ensure that we maintain an appropriate level of contingent liquidity . management monitors liquidity through a series of early warning indicators that may indicate a potential market , or pnc-specific , liquidity stress event . in addition , management performs a set of liquidity stress tests over multiple time horizons with varying levels of severity and maintains a contingency funding plan to address a potential liquidity stress event . in the most severe liquidity stress simulation , we assume that our liquidity position is under pressure , while the market in general is under systemic pressure . the simulation considers , among other things , the impact of restricted access to both secured and unsecured external sources of funding , accelerated run-off of customer deposits , valuation pressure on assets and heavy demand to fund committed obligations . parent company liquidity guidelines are designed to help ensure that sufficient liquidity is available to meet our parent company obligations over the succeeding 24-month period . liquidity-related risk limits are established within our enterprise liquidity management policy and supporting policies . management committees , including the asset and liability committee , and the board of directors and its risk committee regularly review compliance with key established limits . in addition to these liquidity monitoring measures and tools described above , we also monitor our liquidity by reference to the liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) which is further described in the supervision and regulation section in item 1 of this report . pnc and pnc bank calculate the lcr on a daily basis and as of december 31 , 2018 , the lcr for pnc and pnc bank exceeded the fully phased-in requirement of 100% ( 100 % ) . we provide additional information regarding regulatory liquidity requirements and their potential impact on us in the supervision and regulation section of item 1 business and item 1a risk factors of this report . sources of liquidity our largest source of liquidity on a consolidated basis is the customer deposit base generated by our banking businesses . these deposits provide relatively stable and low-cost funding . total deposits increased to $ 267.8 billion at december 31 , 2018 from $ 265.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 driven by growth in interest-bearing deposits partially offset by a decrease in noninterest-bearing deposits . see the funding sources section of the consolidated balance sheet review in this report for additional information related to our deposits . additionally , certain assets determined by us to be liquid as well as unused borrowing capacity from a number of sources are also available to manage our liquidity position . at december 31 , 2018 , our liquid assets consisted of short-term investments ( federal funds sold , resale agreements , trading securities and interest-earning deposits with banks ) totaling $ 22.1 billion and securities available for sale totaling $ 63.4 billion . the level of liquid assets fluctuates over time based on many factors , including market conditions , loan and deposit growth and balance sheet management activities . our liquid assets included $ 2.7 billion of securities available for sale and trading securities pledged as collateral to secure public and trust deposits , repurchase agreements and for other purposes . in addition , $ 4.9 billion of securities held to maturity were also pledged as collateral for these purposes . we also obtain liquidity through various forms of funding , including long-term debt ( senior notes , subordinated debt and fhlb borrowings ) and short-term borrowings ( securities sold under repurchase agreements , commercial paper and other short-term borrowings ) . see note 10 borrowed funds and the funding sources section of the consolidated balance sheet review in this report for additional information related to our borrowings . total senior and subordinated debt , on a consolidated basis , decreased due to the following activity : table 24 : senior and subordinated debt . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 33.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>issuances</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>calls and maturities</td><td>-6.8 ( 6.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>-.1 ( .1 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 30.9</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of liquid assets?
Answer: 22.1
Question: what was the value of securities available for sale?
| 63.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 65 liquidity and capital management liquidity risk has two fundamental components . the first is potential loss assuming we were unable to meet our funding requirements at a reasonable cost . the second is the potential inability to operate our businesses because adequate contingent liquidity is not available . we manage liquidity risk at the consolidated company level ( bank , parent company and nonbank subsidiaries combined ) to help ensure that we can obtain cost-effective funding to meet current and future obligations under both normal 201cbusiness as usual 201d and stressful circumstances , and to help ensure that we maintain an appropriate level of contingent liquidity . management monitors liquidity through a series of early warning indicators that may indicate a potential market , or pnc-specific , liquidity stress event . in addition , management performs a set of liquidity stress tests over multiple time horizons with varying levels of severity and maintains a contingency funding plan to address a potential liquidity stress event . in the most severe liquidity stress simulation , we assume that our liquidity position is under pressure , while the market in general is under systemic pressure . the simulation considers , among other things , the impact of restricted access to both secured and unsecured external sources of funding , accelerated run-off of customer deposits , valuation pressure on assets and heavy demand to fund committed obligations . parent company liquidity guidelines are designed to help ensure that sufficient liquidity is available to meet our parent company obligations over the succeeding 24-month period . liquidity-related risk limits are established within our enterprise liquidity management policy and supporting policies . management committees , including the asset and liability committee , and the board of directors and its risk committee regularly review compliance with key established limits . in addition to these liquidity monitoring measures and tools described above , we also monitor our liquidity by reference to the liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) which is further described in the supervision and regulation section in item 1 of this report . pnc and pnc bank calculate the lcr on a daily basis and as of december 31 , 2018 , the lcr for pnc and pnc bank exceeded the fully phased-in requirement of 100% ( 100 % ) . we provide additional information regarding regulatory liquidity requirements and their potential impact on us in the supervision and regulation section of item 1 business and item 1a risk factors of this report . sources of liquidity our largest source of liquidity on a consolidated basis is the customer deposit base generated by our banking businesses . these deposits provide relatively stable and low-cost funding . total deposits increased to $ 267.8 billion at december 31 , 2018 from $ 265.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 driven by growth in interest-bearing deposits partially offset by a decrease in noninterest-bearing deposits . see the funding sources section of the consolidated balance sheet review in this report for additional information related to our deposits . additionally , certain assets determined by us to be liquid as well as unused borrowing capacity from a number of sources are also available to manage our liquidity position . at december 31 , 2018 , our liquid assets consisted of short-term investments ( federal funds sold , resale agreements , trading securities and interest-earning deposits with banks ) totaling $ 22.1 billion and securities available for sale totaling $ 63.4 billion . the level of liquid assets fluctuates over time based on many factors , including market conditions , loan and deposit growth and balance sheet management activities . our liquid assets included $ 2.7 billion of securities available for sale and trading securities pledged as collateral to secure public and trust deposits , repurchase agreements and for other purposes . in addition , $ 4.9 billion of securities held to maturity were also pledged as collateral for these purposes . we also obtain liquidity through various forms of funding , including long-term debt ( senior notes , subordinated debt and fhlb borrowings ) and short-term borrowings ( securities sold under repurchase agreements , commercial paper and other short-term borrowings ) . see note 10 borrowed funds and the funding sources section of the consolidated balance sheet review in this report for additional information related to our borrowings . total senior and subordinated debt , on a consolidated basis , decreased due to the following activity : table 24 : senior and subordinated debt . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 33.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>issuances</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>calls and maturities</td><td>-6.8 ( 6.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>-.1 ( .1 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 30.9</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of liquid assets?
Answer: 22.1
Question: what was the value of securities available for sale?
Answer: 63.4
Question: what is the sum?
| 85.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 65 liquidity and capital management liquidity risk has two fundamental components . the first is potential loss assuming we were unable to meet our funding requirements at a reasonable cost . the second is the potential inability to operate our businesses because adequate contingent liquidity is not available . we manage liquidity risk at the consolidated company level ( bank , parent company and nonbank subsidiaries combined ) to help ensure that we can obtain cost-effective funding to meet current and future obligations under both normal 201cbusiness as usual 201d and stressful circumstances , and to help ensure that we maintain an appropriate level of contingent liquidity . management monitors liquidity through a series of early warning indicators that may indicate a potential market , or pnc-specific , liquidity stress event . in addition , management performs a set of liquidity stress tests over multiple time horizons with varying levels of severity and maintains a contingency funding plan to address a potential liquidity stress event . in the most severe liquidity stress simulation , we assume that our liquidity position is under pressure , while the market in general is under systemic pressure . the simulation considers , among other things , the impact of restricted access to both secured and unsecured external sources of funding , accelerated run-off of customer deposits , valuation pressure on assets and heavy demand to fund committed obligations . parent company liquidity guidelines are designed to help ensure that sufficient liquidity is available to meet our parent company obligations over the succeeding 24-month period . liquidity-related risk limits are established within our enterprise liquidity management policy and supporting policies . management committees , including the asset and liability committee , and the board of directors and its risk committee regularly review compliance with key established limits . in addition to these liquidity monitoring measures and tools described above , we also monitor our liquidity by reference to the liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) which is further described in the supervision and regulation section in item 1 of this report . pnc and pnc bank calculate the lcr on a daily basis and as of december 31 , 2018 , the lcr for pnc and pnc bank exceeded the fully phased-in requirement of 100% ( 100 % ) . we provide additional information regarding regulatory liquidity requirements and their potential impact on us in the supervision and regulation section of item 1 business and item 1a risk factors of this report . sources of liquidity our largest source of liquidity on a consolidated basis is the customer deposit base generated by our banking businesses . these deposits provide relatively stable and low-cost funding . total deposits increased to $ 267.8 billion at december 31 , 2018 from $ 265.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 driven by growth in interest-bearing deposits partially offset by a decrease in noninterest-bearing deposits . see the funding sources section of the consolidated balance sheet review in this report for additional information related to our deposits . additionally , certain assets determined by us to be liquid as well as unused borrowing capacity from a number of sources are also available to manage our liquidity position . at december 31 , 2018 , our liquid assets consisted of short-term investments ( federal funds sold , resale agreements , trading securities and interest-earning deposits with banks ) totaling $ 22.1 billion and securities available for sale totaling $ 63.4 billion . the level of liquid assets fluctuates over time based on many factors , including market conditions , loan and deposit growth and balance sheet management activities . our liquid assets included $ 2.7 billion of securities available for sale and trading securities pledged as collateral to secure public and trust deposits , repurchase agreements and for other purposes . in addition , $ 4.9 billion of securities held to maturity were also pledged as collateral for these purposes . we also obtain liquidity through various forms of funding , including long-term debt ( senior notes , subordinated debt and fhlb borrowings ) and short-term borrowings ( securities sold under repurchase agreements , commercial paper and other short-term borrowings ) . see note 10 borrowed funds and the funding sources section of the consolidated balance sheet review in this report for additional information related to our borrowings . total senior and subordinated debt , on a consolidated basis , decreased due to the following activity : table 24 : senior and subordinated debt . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 33.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>issuances</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>calls and maturities</td><td>-6.8 ( 6.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>-.1 ( .1 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 30.9</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of liquid assets?
Answer: 22.1
Question: what was the value of securities available for sale?
Answer: 63.4
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 85.5
Question: what is the liquid asset value?
| 22.1 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 65 liquidity and capital management liquidity risk has two fundamental components . the first is potential loss assuming we were unable to meet our funding requirements at a reasonable cost . the second is the potential inability to operate our businesses because adequate contingent liquidity is not available . we manage liquidity risk at the consolidated company level ( bank , parent company and nonbank subsidiaries combined ) to help ensure that we can obtain cost-effective funding to meet current and future obligations under both normal 201cbusiness as usual 201d and stressful circumstances , and to help ensure that we maintain an appropriate level of contingent liquidity . management monitors liquidity through a series of early warning indicators that may indicate a potential market , or pnc-specific , liquidity stress event . in addition , management performs a set of liquidity stress tests over multiple time horizons with varying levels of severity and maintains a contingency funding plan to address a potential liquidity stress event . in the most severe liquidity stress simulation , we assume that our liquidity position is under pressure , while the market in general is under systemic pressure . the simulation considers , among other things , the impact of restricted access to both secured and unsecured external sources of funding , accelerated run-off of customer deposits , valuation pressure on assets and heavy demand to fund committed obligations . parent company liquidity guidelines are designed to help ensure that sufficient liquidity is available to meet our parent company obligations over the succeeding 24-month period . liquidity-related risk limits are established within our enterprise liquidity management policy and supporting policies . management committees , including the asset and liability committee , and the board of directors and its risk committee regularly review compliance with key established limits . in addition to these liquidity monitoring measures and tools described above , we also monitor our liquidity by reference to the liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) which is further described in the supervision and regulation section in item 1 of this report . pnc and pnc bank calculate the lcr on a daily basis and as of december 31 , 2018 , the lcr for pnc and pnc bank exceeded the fully phased-in requirement of 100% ( 100 % ) . we provide additional information regarding regulatory liquidity requirements and their potential impact on us in the supervision and regulation section of item 1 business and item 1a risk factors of this report . sources of liquidity our largest source of liquidity on a consolidated basis is the customer deposit base generated by our banking businesses . these deposits provide relatively stable and low-cost funding . total deposits increased to $ 267.8 billion at december 31 , 2018 from $ 265.1 billion at december 31 , 2017 driven by growth in interest-bearing deposits partially offset by a decrease in noninterest-bearing deposits . see the funding sources section of the consolidated balance sheet review in this report for additional information related to our deposits . additionally , certain assets determined by us to be liquid as well as unused borrowing capacity from a number of sources are also available to manage our liquidity position . at december 31 , 2018 , our liquid assets consisted of short-term investments ( federal funds sold , resale agreements , trading securities and interest-earning deposits with banks ) totaling $ 22.1 billion and securities available for sale totaling $ 63.4 billion . the level of liquid assets fluctuates over time based on many factors , including market conditions , loan and deposit growth and balance sheet management activities . our liquid assets included $ 2.7 billion of securities available for sale and trading securities pledged as collateral to secure public and trust deposits , repurchase agreements and for other purposes . in addition , $ 4.9 billion of securities held to maturity were also pledged as collateral for these purposes . we also obtain liquidity through various forms of funding , including long-term debt ( senior notes , subordinated debt and fhlb borrowings ) and short-term borrowings ( securities sold under repurchase agreements , commercial paper and other short-term borrowings ) . see note 10 borrowed funds and the funding sources section of the consolidated balance sheet review in this report for additional information related to our borrowings . total senior and subordinated debt , on a consolidated basis , decreased due to the following activity : table 24 : senior and subordinated debt . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 33.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>issuances</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>calls and maturities</td><td>-6.8 ( 6.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>-.1 ( .1 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 30.9</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of liquid assets?
Answer: 22.1
Question: what was the value of securities available for sale?
Answer: 63.4
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 85.5
Question: what is the liquid asset value?
Answer: 22.1
Question: what is that divided by the prior sum of values?
| 0.25848 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
stock performance graph the following performance graph compares the cumulative total return ( including dividends ) to the holders of our common stock from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007 , with the cumulative total returns of the nyse composite index , the ftse nareit composite reit index ( the 201call reit index 201d ) , the ftse nareit healthcare equity reit index ( the 201chealthcare reit index 201d ) and the russell 1000 index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , as applicable . we have included the nyse composite index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the nyse . we have included the other indices because we believe that they are either most representative of the industry in which we compete , or otherwise provide a fair basis for comparison with ventas , and are therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance . the figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2002</td><td>12/31/2003</td><td>12/31/2004</td><td>12/31/2005</td><td>12/31/2006</td><td>12/31/2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ventas</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 206</td><td>$ 270</td><td>$ 331</td><td>$ 457</td><td>$ 512</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nyse composite index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 151</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 200</td><td>$ 217</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>all reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 181</td><td>$ 196</td><td>$ 262</td><td>$ 215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>healthcare reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 186</td><td>$ 189</td><td>$ 273</td><td>$ 279</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>russell 1000 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 188</td></tr></table> ventas nyse composite index all reit index healthcare reit index russell 1000 index .
Question: what was the difference between the value of the nyse composite index in 2007 and 2002?
| 117.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
stock performance graph the following performance graph compares the cumulative total return ( including dividends ) to the holders of our common stock from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007 , with the cumulative total returns of the nyse composite index , the ftse nareit composite reit index ( the 201call reit index 201d ) , the ftse nareit healthcare equity reit index ( the 201chealthcare reit index 201d ) and the russell 1000 index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , as applicable . we have included the nyse composite index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the nyse . we have included the other indices because we believe that they are either most representative of the industry in which we compete , or otherwise provide a fair basis for comparison with ventas , and are therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance . the figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2002</td><td>12/31/2003</td><td>12/31/2004</td><td>12/31/2005</td><td>12/31/2006</td><td>12/31/2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ventas</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 206</td><td>$ 270</td><td>$ 331</td><td>$ 457</td><td>$ 512</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nyse composite index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 132</td><td>$ 151</td><td>$ 166</td><td>$ 200</td><td>$ 217</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>all reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 181</td><td>$ 196</td><td>$ 262</td><td>$ 215</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>healthcare reit index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 186</td><td>$ 189</td><td>$ 273</td><td>$ 279</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>russell 1000 index</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 145</td><td>$ 154</td><td>$ 178</td><td>$ 188</td></tr></table> ventas nyse composite index all reit index healthcare reit index russell 1000 index .
Question: what was the difference between the value of the nyse composite index in 2007 and 2002?
Answer: 117.0
Question: how much does that difference represent in relation to the 2002 value?
| 1.17 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
note 18 2013 earnings per share ( eps ) basic eps is calculated by dividing net earnings attributable to allegion plc by the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding for the applicable period . diluted eps is calculated after adjusting the denominator of the basic eps calculation for the effect of all potentially dilutive ordinary shares , which in the company 2019s case , includes shares issuable under share-based compensation plans . the following table summarizes the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share calculations: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted-average number of basic shares</td><td>95.0</td><td>95.1</td><td>95.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares issuable under incentive stock plans</td><td>0.7</td><td>0.9</td><td>1.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average number of diluted shares</td><td>95.7</td><td>96.0</td><td>96.9</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2018 , 0.1 million stock options were excluded from the computation of weighted-average diluted shares outstanding because the effect of including these shares would have been anti-dilutive . note 19 2013 net revenues net revenues are recognized based on the satisfaction of performance obligations under the terms of a contract . a performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer control of a distinct product or to provide a service , or a bundle of products or services , to a customer , and is the unit of account under asc 606 . the company has two principal revenue streams , tangible product sales and services . approximately 99% ( 99 % ) of consolidated net revenues involve contracts with a single performance obligation , which is the transfer of control of a product or bundle of products to a customer . transfer of control typically occurs when goods are shipped from the company's facilities or at other predetermined control transfer points ( for instance , destination terms ) . net revenues are measured as the amount of consideration expected to be received in exchange for transferring control of the products and takes into account variable consideration , such as sales incentive programs including discounts and volume rebates . the existence of these programs does not preclude revenue recognition but does require the company's best estimate of the variable consideration to be made based on expected activity , as these items are reserved for as a deduction to net revenues over time based on the company's historical rates of providing these incentives and annual forecasted sales volumes . the company also offers a standard warranty with most product sales and the value of such warranty is included in the contractual price . the corresponding cost of the warranty obligation is accrued as a liability ( see note 20 ) . the company's remaining net revenues involve services , including installation and consulting . unlike the single performance obligation to ship a product or bundle of products , the service revenue stream delays revenue recognition until the service performance obligations are satisfied . in some instances , customer acceptance provisions are included in sales arrangements to give the buyer the ability to ensure the service meets the criteria established in the order . in these instances , revenue recognition is deferred until the performance obligations are satisfied , which could include acceptance terms specified in the arrangement being fulfilled through customer acceptance or a demonstration that established criteria have been satisfied . during the year ended december 31 , 2018 , no adjustments related to performance obligations satisfied in previous periods were recorded . upon adoption of asc 606 , the company used the practical expedients to omit the disclosure of remaining performance obligations for contracts with an original expected duration of one year or less and for contracts where the company has the right to invoice for performance completed to date . the transaction price is not adjusted for the effects of a significant financing component , as the time period between control transfer of goods and services is less than one year . sales , value-added and other similar taxes collected by the company are excluded from net revenues . the company has also elected to account for shipping and handling activities that occur after control of the related goods transfers as fulfillment activities instead of performance obligations . these activities are included in cost of goods sold in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income . the company 2019s payment terms are generally consistent with the industries in which their businesses operate . the following table shows the company's net revenues for the years ended december 31 , based on the two principal revenue streams , tangible product sales and services , disaggregated by business segment . net revenues are shown by tangible product sales and services , as contract terms , conditions and economic factors affecting the nature , amount , timing and uncertainty around revenue recognition and cash flows are substantially similar within each of the two principal revenue streams: .
Question: what is the difference between the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2018 and 2017?
| -0.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
note 18 2013 earnings per share ( eps ) basic eps is calculated by dividing net earnings attributable to allegion plc by the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding for the applicable period . diluted eps is calculated after adjusting the denominator of the basic eps calculation for the effect of all potentially dilutive ordinary shares , which in the company 2019s case , includes shares issuable under share-based compensation plans . the following table summarizes the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share calculations: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted-average number of basic shares</td><td>95.0</td><td>95.1</td><td>95.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares issuable under incentive stock plans</td><td>0.7</td><td>0.9</td><td>1.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average number of diluted shares</td><td>95.7</td><td>96.0</td><td>96.9</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2018 , 0.1 million stock options were excluded from the computation of weighted-average diluted shares outstanding because the effect of including these shares would have been anti-dilutive . note 19 2013 net revenues net revenues are recognized based on the satisfaction of performance obligations under the terms of a contract . a performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer control of a distinct product or to provide a service , or a bundle of products or services , to a customer , and is the unit of account under asc 606 . the company has two principal revenue streams , tangible product sales and services . approximately 99% ( 99 % ) of consolidated net revenues involve contracts with a single performance obligation , which is the transfer of control of a product or bundle of products to a customer . transfer of control typically occurs when goods are shipped from the company's facilities or at other predetermined control transfer points ( for instance , destination terms ) . net revenues are measured as the amount of consideration expected to be received in exchange for transferring control of the products and takes into account variable consideration , such as sales incentive programs including discounts and volume rebates . the existence of these programs does not preclude revenue recognition but does require the company's best estimate of the variable consideration to be made based on expected activity , as these items are reserved for as a deduction to net revenues over time based on the company's historical rates of providing these incentives and annual forecasted sales volumes . the company also offers a standard warranty with most product sales and the value of such warranty is included in the contractual price . the corresponding cost of the warranty obligation is accrued as a liability ( see note 20 ) . the company's remaining net revenues involve services , including installation and consulting . unlike the single performance obligation to ship a product or bundle of products , the service revenue stream delays revenue recognition until the service performance obligations are satisfied . in some instances , customer acceptance provisions are included in sales arrangements to give the buyer the ability to ensure the service meets the criteria established in the order . in these instances , revenue recognition is deferred until the performance obligations are satisfied , which could include acceptance terms specified in the arrangement being fulfilled through customer acceptance or a demonstration that established criteria have been satisfied . during the year ended december 31 , 2018 , no adjustments related to performance obligations satisfied in previous periods were recorded . upon adoption of asc 606 , the company used the practical expedients to omit the disclosure of remaining performance obligations for contracts with an original expected duration of one year or less and for contracts where the company has the right to invoice for performance completed to date . the transaction price is not adjusted for the effects of a significant financing component , as the time period between control transfer of goods and services is less than one year . sales , value-added and other similar taxes collected by the company are excluded from net revenues . the company has also elected to account for shipping and handling activities that occur after control of the related goods transfers as fulfillment activities instead of performance obligations . these activities are included in cost of goods sold in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income . the company 2019s payment terms are generally consistent with the industries in which their businesses operate . the following table shows the company's net revenues for the years ended december 31 , based on the two principal revenue streams , tangible product sales and services , disaggregated by business segment . net revenues are shown by tangible product sales and services , as contract terms , conditions and economic factors affecting the nature , amount , timing and uncertainty around revenue recognition and cash flows are substantially similar within each of the two principal revenue streams: .
Question: what is the difference between the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2018 and 2017?
Answer: -0.3
Question: what is the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2017?
| 96.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
note 18 2013 earnings per share ( eps ) basic eps is calculated by dividing net earnings attributable to allegion plc by the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding for the applicable period . diluted eps is calculated after adjusting the denominator of the basic eps calculation for the effect of all potentially dilutive ordinary shares , which in the company 2019s case , includes shares issuable under share-based compensation plans . the following table summarizes the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share calculations: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted-average number of basic shares</td><td>95.0</td><td>95.1</td><td>95.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares issuable under incentive stock plans</td><td>0.7</td><td>0.9</td><td>1.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average number of diluted shares</td><td>95.7</td><td>96.0</td><td>96.9</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2018 , 0.1 million stock options were excluded from the computation of weighted-average diluted shares outstanding because the effect of including these shares would have been anti-dilutive . note 19 2013 net revenues net revenues are recognized based on the satisfaction of performance obligations under the terms of a contract . a performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer control of a distinct product or to provide a service , or a bundle of products or services , to a customer , and is the unit of account under asc 606 . the company has two principal revenue streams , tangible product sales and services . approximately 99% ( 99 % ) of consolidated net revenues involve contracts with a single performance obligation , which is the transfer of control of a product or bundle of products to a customer . transfer of control typically occurs when goods are shipped from the company's facilities or at other predetermined control transfer points ( for instance , destination terms ) . net revenues are measured as the amount of consideration expected to be received in exchange for transferring control of the products and takes into account variable consideration , such as sales incentive programs including discounts and volume rebates . the existence of these programs does not preclude revenue recognition but does require the company's best estimate of the variable consideration to be made based on expected activity , as these items are reserved for as a deduction to net revenues over time based on the company's historical rates of providing these incentives and annual forecasted sales volumes . the company also offers a standard warranty with most product sales and the value of such warranty is included in the contractual price . the corresponding cost of the warranty obligation is accrued as a liability ( see note 20 ) . the company's remaining net revenues involve services , including installation and consulting . unlike the single performance obligation to ship a product or bundle of products , the service revenue stream delays revenue recognition until the service performance obligations are satisfied . in some instances , customer acceptance provisions are included in sales arrangements to give the buyer the ability to ensure the service meets the criteria established in the order . in these instances , revenue recognition is deferred until the performance obligations are satisfied , which could include acceptance terms specified in the arrangement being fulfilled through customer acceptance or a demonstration that established criteria have been satisfied . during the year ended december 31 , 2018 , no adjustments related to performance obligations satisfied in previous periods were recorded . upon adoption of asc 606 , the company used the practical expedients to omit the disclosure of remaining performance obligations for contracts with an original expected duration of one year or less and for contracts where the company has the right to invoice for performance completed to date . the transaction price is not adjusted for the effects of a significant financing component , as the time period between control transfer of goods and services is less than one year . sales , value-added and other similar taxes collected by the company are excluded from net revenues . the company has also elected to account for shipping and handling activities that occur after control of the related goods transfers as fulfillment activities instead of performance obligations . these activities are included in cost of goods sold in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income . the company 2019s payment terms are generally consistent with the industries in which their businesses operate . the following table shows the company's net revenues for the years ended december 31 , based on the two principal revenue streams , tangible product sales and services , disaggregated by business segment . net revenues are shown by tangible product sales and services , as contract terms , conditions and economic factors affecting the nature , amount , timing and uncertainty around revenue recognition and cash flows are substantially similar within each of the two principal revenue streams: .
Question: what is the difference between the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2018 and 2017?
Answer: -0.3
Question: what is the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2017?
Answer: 96.0
Question: how much does that difference represents in relation to the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2017?
| -0.00312 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
note 18 2013 earnings per share ( eps ) basic eps is calculated by dividing net earnings attributable to allegion plc by the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding for the applicable period . diluted eps is calculated after adjusting the denominator of the basic eps calculation for the effect of all potentially dilutive ordinary shares , which in the company 2019s case , includes shares issuable under share-based compensation plans . the following table summarizes the weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share calculations: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted-average number of basic shares</td><td>95.0</td><td>95.1</td><td>95.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>shares issuable under incentive stock plans</td><td>0.7</td><td>0.9</td><td>1.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average number of diluted shares</td><td>95.7</td><td>96.0</td><td>96.9</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2018 , 0.1 million stock options were excluded from the computation of weighted-average diluted shares outstanding because the effect of including these shares would have been anti-dilutive . note 19 2013 net revenues net revenues are recognized based on the satisfaction of performance obligations under the terms of a contract . a performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer control of a distinct product or to provide a service , or a bundle of products or services , to a customer , and is the unit of account under asc 606 . the company has two principal revenue streams , tangible product sales and services . approximately 99% ( 99 % ) of consolidated net revenues involve contracts with a single performance obligation , which is the transfer of control of a product or bundle of products to a customer . transfer of control typically occurs when goods are shipped from the company's facilities or at other predetermined control transfer points ( for instance , destination terms ) . net revenues are measured as the amount of consideration expected to be received in exchange for transferring control of the products and takes into account variable consideration , such as sales incentive programs including discounts and volume rebates . the existence of these programs does not preclude revenue recognition but does require the company's best estimate of the variable consideration to be made based on expected activity , as these items are reserved for as a deduction to net revenues over time based on the company's historical rates of providing these incentives and annual forecasted sales volumes . the company also offers a standard warranty with most product sales and the value of such warranty is included in the contractual price . the corresponding cost of the warranty obligation is accrued as a liability ( see note 20 ) . the company's remaining net revenues involve services , including installation and consulting . unlike the single performance obligation to ship a product or bundle of products , the service revenue stream delays revenue recognition until the service performance obligations are satisfied . in some instances , customer acceptance provisions are included in sales arrangements to give the buyer the ability to ensure the service meets the criteria established in the order . in these instances , revenue recognition is deferred until the performance obligations are satisfied , which could include acceptance terms specified in the arrangement being fulfilled through customer acceptance or a demonstration that established criteria have been satisfied . during the year ended december 31 , 2018 , no adjustments related to performance obligations satisfied in previous periods were recorded . upon adoption of asc 606 , the company used the practical expedients to omit the disclosure of remaining performance obligations for contracts with an original expected duration of one year or less and for contracts where the company has the right to invoice for performance completed to date . the transaction price is not adjusted for the effects of a significant financing component , as the time period between control transfer of goods and services is less than one year . sales , value-added and other similar taxes collected by the company are excluded from net revenues . the company has also elected to account for shipping and handling activities that occur after control of the related goods transfers as fulfillment activities instead of performance obligations . these activities are included in cost of goods sold in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income . the company 2019s payment terms are generally consistent with the industries in which their businesses operate . the following table shows the company's net revenues for the years ended december 31 , based on the two principal revenue streams , tangible product sales and services , disaggregated by business segment . net revenues are shown by tangible product sales and services , as contract terms , conditions and economic factors affecting the nature , amount , timing and uncertainty around revenue recognition and cash flows are substantially similar within each of the two principal revenue streams: .
Question: what is the difference between the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2018 and 2017?
Answer: -0.3
Question: what is the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2017?
Answer: 96.0
Question: how much does that difference represents in relation to the weighted-average number of diluted shares of 2017?
Answer: -0.00312
Question: and how much does that represents in 100 basis (percent)?
| -0.3125 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
arconic and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and various states and foreign jurisdictions . with a few minor exceptions , arconic is no longer subject to income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2006 . all u.s . tax years prior to 2016 have been audited by the internal revenue service . various state and foreign jurisdiction tax authorities are in the process of examining arconic 2019s income tax returns for various tax years through 2015 . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31,</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 18</td><td>$ 7</td><td>$ 8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for tax positions of the current year</td><td>12</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>14</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with tax authorities</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expiration of the statute of limitations</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 28</td><td>$ 18</td><td>$ 7</td></tr></table> for all periods presented , a portion of the balance at end of year pertains to state tax liabilities , which are presented before any offset for federal tax benefits . the effect of unrecognized tax benefits , if recorded , that would impact the annual effective tax rate for 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 would be approximately 6% ( 6 % ) , 7% ( 7 % ) , and 4% ( 4 % ) , respectively , of pretax book income . arconic does not anticipate that changes in its unrecognized tax benefits will have a material impact on the statement of consolidated operations during 2017 ( see tax in note l for a matter for which no reserve has been recognized ) . it is arconic 2019s policy to recognize interest and penalties related to income taxes as a component of the provision for income taxes on the accompanying statement of consolidated operations . in 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , arconic did not recognize any interest or penalties . due to the expiration of the statute of limitations , settlements with tax authorities , and refunded overpayments , arconic recognized interest income of $ 1 in 2015 but did not recognize any interest income in 2016 or 2014 . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the amount accrued for the payment of interest and penalties was $ 2 and $ 1 , respectively . s . receivables sale of receivables programs arconic has an arrangement with three financial institutions to sell certain customer receivables without recourse on a revolving basis . the sale of such receivables is completed through the use of a bankruptcy remote special purpose entity , which is a consolidated subsidiary of arconic . this arrangement provides for minimum funding of $ 200 up to a maximum of $ 400 for receivables sold . on march 30 , 2012 , arconic initially sold $ 304 of customer receivables in exchange for $ 50 in cash and $ 254 of deferred purchase price under this arrangement . arconic has received additional net cash funding of $ 300 for receivables sold ( $ 1758 in draws and $ 1458 in repayments ) since the program 2019s inception , including $ 100 ( $ 500 in draws and $ 400 in repayments ) in 2016 . no draws or repayments occurred in 2015 . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the deferred purchase price receivable was $ 83 and $ 249 , respectively , which was included in other receivables on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . the deferred purchase price receivable is reduced as collections of the underlying receivables occur ; however , as this is a revolving program , the sale of new receivables will result in an increase in the deferred purchase price receivable . the net change in the deferred purchase price receivable was reflected in the ( increase ) decrease in receivables line item on the accompanying statement of consolidated cash flows . this activity is reflected as an operating cash flow because the related customer receivables are the result of an operating activity with an insignificant , short-term interest rate risk. .
Question: what was the difference in the deferred purchase price receivables from 2015 to 2016?
| -166.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
arconic and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and various states and foreign jurisdictions . with a few minor exceptions , arconic is no longer subject to income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2006 . all u.s . tax years prior to 2016 have been audited by the internal revenue service . various state and foreign jurisdiction tax authorities are in the process of examining arconic 2019s income tax returns for various tax years through 2015 . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31,</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 18</td><td>$ 7</td><td>$ 8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for tax positions of the current year</td><td>12</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>14</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with tax authorities</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expiration of the statute of limitations</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 28</td><td>$ 18</td><td>$ 7</td></tr></table> for all periods presented , a portion of the balance at end of year pertains to state tax liabilities , which are presented before any offset for federal tax benefits . the effect of unrecognized tax benefits , if recorded , that would impact the annual effective tax rate for 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 would be approximately 6% ( 6 % ) , 7% ( 7 % ) , and 4% ( 4 % ) , respectively , of pretax book income . arconic does not anticipate that changes in its unrecognized tax benefits will have a material impact on the statement of consolidated operations during 2017 ( see tax in note l for a matter for which no reserve has been recognized ) . it is arconic 2019s policy to recognize interest and penalties related to income taxes as a component of the provision for income taxes on the accompanying statement of consolidated operations . in 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , arconic did not recognize any interest or penalties . due to the expiration of the statute of limitations , settlements with tax authorities , and refunded overpayments , arconic recognized interest income of $ 1 in 2015 but did not recognize any interest income in 2016 or 2014 . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the amount accrued for the payment of interest and penalties was $ 2 and $ 1 , respectively . s . receivables sale of receivables programs arconic has an arrangement with three financial institutions to sell certain customer receivables without recourse on a revolving basis . the sale of such receivables is completed through the use of a bankruptcy remote special purpose entity , which is a consolidated subsidiary of arconic . this arrangement provides for minimum funding of $ 200 up to a maximum of $ 400 for receivables sold . on march 30 , 2012 , arconic initially sold $ 304 of customer receivables in exchange for $ 50 in cash and $ 254 of deferred purchase price under this arrangement . arconic has received additional net cash funding of $ 300 for receivables sold ( $ 1758 in draws and $ 1458 in repayments ) since the program 2019s inception , including $ 100 ( $ 500 in draws and $ 400 in repayments ) in 2016 . no draws or repayments occurred in 2015 . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the deferred purchase price receivable was $ 83 and $ 249 , respectively , which was included in other receivables on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . the deferred purchase price receivable is reduced as collections of the underlying receivables occur ; however , as this is a revolving program , the sale of new receivables will result in an increase in the deferred purchase price receivable . the net change in the deferred purchase price receivable was reflected in the ( increase ) decrease in receivables line item on the accompanying statement of consolidated cash flows . this activity is reflected as an operating cash flow because the related customer receivables are the result of an operating activity with an insignificant , short-term interest rate risk. .
Question: what was the difference in the deferred purchase price receivables from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: -166.0
Question: what was the value in 2015?
| 249.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
arconic and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and various states and foreign jurisdictions . with a few minor exceptions , arconic is no longer subject to income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2006 . all u.s . tax years prior to 2016 have been audited by the internal revenue service . various state and foreign jurisdiction tax authorities are in the process of examining arconic 2019s income tax returns for various tax years through 2015 . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31,</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of year</td><td>$ 18</td><td>$ 7</td><td>$ 8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions for tax positions of the current year</td><td>12</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>14</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with tax authorities</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>expiration of the statute of limitations</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>foreign currency translation</td><td>-</td><td>-</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>balance at end of year</td><td>$ 28</td><td>$ 18</td><td>$ 7</td></tr></table> for all periods presented , a portion of the balance at end of year pertains to state tax liabilities , which are presented before any offset for federal tax benefits . the effect of unrecognized tax benefits , if recorded , that would impact the annual effective tax rate for 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 would be approximately 6% ( 6 % ) , 7% ( 7 % ) , and 4% ( 4 % ) , respectively , of pretax book income . arconic does not anticipate that changes in its unrecognized tax benefits will have a material impact on the statement of consolidated operations during 2017 ( see tax in note l for a matter for which no reserve has been recognized ) . it is arconic 2019s policy to recognize interest and penalties related to income taxes as a component of the provision for income taxes on the accompanying statement of consolidated operations . in 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , arconic did not recognize any interest or penalties . due to the expiration of the statute of limitations , settlements with tax authorities , and refunded overpayments , arconic recognized interest income of $ 1 in 2015 but did not recognize any interest income in 2016 or 2014 . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the amount accrued for the payment of interest and penalties was $ 2 and $ 1 , respectively . s . receivables sale of receivables programs arconic has an arrangement with three financial institutions to sell certain customer receivables without recourse on a revolving basis . the sale of such receivables is completed through the use of a bankruptcy remote special purpose entity , which is a consolidated subsidiary of arconic . this arrangement provides for minimum funding of $ 200 up to a maximum of $ 400 for receivables sold . on march 30 , 2012 , arconic initially sold $ 304 of customer receivables in exchange for $ 50 in cash and $ 254 of deferred purchase price under this arrangement . arconic has received additional net cash funding of $ 300 for receivables sold ( $ 1758 in draws and $ 1458 in repayments ) since the program 2019s inception , including $ 100 ( $ 500 in draws and $ 400 in repayments ) in 2016 . no draws or repayments occurred in 2015 . as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , the deferred purchase price receivable was $ 83 and $ 249 , respectively , which was included in other receivables on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet . the deferred purchase price receivable is reduced as collections of the underlying receivables occur ; however , as this is a revolving program , the sale of new receivables will result in an increase in the deferred purchase price receivable . the net change in the deferred purchase price receivable was reflected in the ( increase ) decrease in receivables line item on the accompanying statement of consolidated cash flows . this activity is reflected as an operating cash flow because the related customer receivables are the result of an operating activity with an insignificant , short-term interest rate risk. .
Question: what was the difference in the deferred purchase price receivables from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: -166.0
Question: what was the value in 2015?
Answer: 249.0
Question: what is the difference divided by the 2015 value?
| -0.66667 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
investments prior to our acquisition of keystone on october 12 , 2007 , we held common shares of keystone , which were classified as an available-for-sale investment security . accordingly , the investment was included in other assets at its fair value , with the unrealized gain excluded from earnings and included in accumulated other comprehensive income , net of applicable taxes . upon our acquisition of keystone on october 12 , 2007 , the unrealized gain was removed from accumulated other comprehensive income , net of applicable taxes , and the original cost of the common shares was considered a component of the purchase price . fair value of financial instruments our debt is reflected on the balance sheet at cost . based on current market conditions , our interest rate margins are below the rate available in the market , which causes the fair value of our debt to fall below the carrying value . the fair value of our term loans ( see note 6 , 201clong-term obligations 201d ) is approximately $ 570 million at december 31 , 2009 , as compared to the carrying value of $ 596 million . we estimated the fair value of our term loans by calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require to assume our obligations . the upfront cash payment , excluding any issuance costs , is the amount that a market participant would be able to lend at december 31 , 2009 to an entity with a credit rating similar to ours and achieve sufficient cash inflows to cover the scheduled cash outflows under our term loans . the carrying amounts of our cash and equivalents , net trade receivables and accounts payable approximate fair value . we apply the market approach to value our financial assets and liabilities , which include the cash surrender value of life insurance , deferred compensation liabilities and interest rate swaps . the market approach utilizes available market information to estimate fair value . required fair value disclosures are included in note 8 , 201cfair value measurements . 201d accrued expenses we self-insure a portion of employee medical benefits under the terms of our employee health insurance program . we purchase certain stop-loss insurance to limit our liability exposure . we also self-insure a portion of our property and casualty risk , which includes automobile liability , general liability , workers 2019 compensation and property under deductible insurance programs . the insurance premium costs are expensed over the contract periods . a reserve for liabilities associated with these losses is established for claims filed and claims incurred but not yet reported based upon our estimate of ultimate cost , which is calculated using analyses of historical data . we monitor new claims and claim development as well as trends related to the claims incurred but not reported in order to assess the adequacy of our insurance reserves . self-insurance reserves on the consolidated balance sheets are net of claims deposits of $ 0.7 million and $ 0.8 million , at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . while we do not expect the amounts ultimately paid to differ significantly from our estimates , our insurance reserves and corresponding expenses could be affected if future claim experience differs significantly from historical trends and assumptions . product warranties some of our mechanical products are sold with a standard six-month warranty against defects . we record the estimated warranty costs at the time of sale using historical warranty claim information to project future warranty claims activity and related expenses . the changes in the warranty reserve are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance as of january 1 2008</td><td>$ 580</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>warranty expense</td><td>3681</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>warranty claims</td><td>-3721 ( 3721 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance as of december 31 2008</td><td>540</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>warranty expense</td><td>5033</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>warranty claims</td><td>-4969 ( 4969 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 31 2009</td><td>$ 604</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in warranty reserve balance from 2008 to 2009?
| 64.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
investments prior to our acquisition of keystone on october 12 , 2007 , we held common shares of keystone , which were classified as an available-for-sale investment security . accordingly , the investment was included in other assets at its fair value , with the unrealized gain excluded from earnings and included in accumulated other comprehensive income , net of applicable taxes . upon our acquisition of keystone on october 12 , 2007 , the unrealized gain was removed from accumulated other comprehensive income , net of applicable taxes , and the original cost of the common shares was considered a component of the purchase price . fair value of financial instruments our debt is reflected on the balance sheet at cost . based on current market conditions , our interest rate margins are below the rate available in the market , which causes the fair value of our debt to fall below the carrying value . the fair value of our term loans ( see note 6 , 201clong-term obligations 201d ) is approximately $ 570 million at december 31 , 2009 , as compared to the carrying value of $ 596 million . we estimated the fair value of our term loans by calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require to assume our obligations . the upfront cash payment , excluding any issuance costs , is the amount that a market participant would be able to lend at december 31 , 2009 to an entity with a credit rating similar to ours and achieve sufficient cash inflows to cover the scheduled cash outflows under our term loans . the carrying amounts of our cash and equivalents , net trade receivables and accounts payable approximate fair value . we apply the market approach to value our financial assets and liabilities , which include the cash surrender value of life insurance , deferred compensation liabilities and interest rate swaps . the market approach utilizes available market information to estimate fair value . required fair value disclosures are included in note 8 , 201cfair value measurements . 201d accrued expenses we self-insure a portion of employee medical benefits under the terms of our employee health insurance program . we purchase certain stop-loss insurance to limit our liability exposure . we also self-insure a portion of our property and casualty risk , which includes automobile liability , general liability , workers 2019 compensation and property under deductible insurance programs . the insurance premium costs are expensed over the contract periods . a reserve for liabilities associated with these losses is established for claims filed and claims incurred but not yet reported based upon our estimate of ultimate cost , which is calculated using analyses of historical data . we monitor new claims and claim development as well as trends related to the claims incurred but not reported in order to assess the adequacy of our insurance reserves . self-insurance reserves on the consolidated balance sheets are net of claims deposits of $ 0.7 million and $ 0.8 million , at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . while we do not expect the amounts ultimately paid to differ significantly from our estimates , our insurance reserves and corresponding expenses could be affected if future claim experience differs significantly from historical trends and assumptions . product warranties some of our mechanical products are sold with a standard six-month warranty against defects . we record the estimated warranty costs at the time of sale using historical warranty claim information to project future warranty claims activity and related expenses . the changes in the warranty reserve are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance as of january 1 2008</td><td>$ 580</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>warranty expense</td><td>3681</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>warranty claims</td><td>-3721 ( 3721 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance as of december 31 2008</td><td>540</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>warranty expense</td><td>5033</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>warranty claims</td><td>-4969 ( 4969 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 31 2009</td><td>$ 604</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in warranty reserve balance from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 64.0
Question: what was the value in 2008?
| 540.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
investments prior to our acquisition of keystone on october 12 , 2007 , we held common shares of keystone , which were classified as an available-for-sale investment security . accordingly , the investment was included in other assets at its fair value , with the unrealized gain excluded from earnings and included in accumulated other comprehensive income , net of applicable taxes . upon our acquisition of keystone on october 12 , 2007 , the unrealized gain was removed from accumulated other comprehensive income , net of applicable taxes , and the original cost of the common shares was considered a component of the purchase price . fair value of financial instruments our debt is reflected on the balance sheet at cost . based on current market conditions , our interest rate margins are below the rate available in the market , which causes the fair value of our debt to fall below the carrying value . the fair value of our term loans ( see note 6 , 201clong-term obligations 201d ) is approximately $ 570 million at december 31 , 2009 , as compared to the carrying value of $ 596 million . we estimated the fair value of our term loans by calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require to assume our obligations . the upfront cash payment , excluding any issuance costs , is the amount that a market participant would be able to lend at december 31 , 2009 to an entity with a credit rating similar to ours and achieve sufficient cash inflows to cover the scheduled cash outflows under our term loans . the carrying amounts of our cash and equivalents , net trade receivables and accounts payable approximate fair value . we apply the market approach to value our financial assets and liabilities , which include the cash surrender value of life insurance , deferred compensation liabilities and interest rate swaps . the market approach utilizes available market information to estimate fair value . required fair value disclosures are included in note 8 , 201cfair value measurements . 201d accrued expenses we self-insure a portion of employee medical benefits under the terms of our employee health insurance program . we purchase certain stop-loss insurance to limit our liability exposure . we also self-insure a portion of our property and casualty risk , which includes automobile liability , general liability , workers 2019 compensation and property under deductible insurance programs . the insurance premium costs are expensed over the contract periods . a reserve for liabilities associated with these losses is established for claims filed and claims incurred but not yet reported based upon our estimate of ultimate cost , which is calculated using analyses of historical data . we monitor new claims and claim development as well as trends related to the claims incurred but not reported in order to assess the adequacy of our insurance reserves . self-insurance reserves on the consolidated balance sheets are net of claims deposits of $ 0.7 million and $ 0.8 million , at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . while we do not expect the amounts ultimately paid to differ significantly from our estimates , our insurance reserves and corresponding expenses could be affected if future claim experience differs significantly from historical trends and assumptions . product warranties some of our mechanical products are sold with a standard six-month warranty against defects . we record the estimated warranty costs at the time of sale using historical warranty claim information to project future warranty claims activity and related expenses . the changes in the warranty reserve are as follows ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance as of january 1 2008</td><td>$ 580</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>warranty expense</td><td>3681</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>warranty claims</td><td>-3721 ( 3721 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance as of december 31 2008</td><td>540</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>warranty expense</td><td>5033</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>warranty claims</td><td>-4969 ( 4969 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance as of december 31 2009</td><td>$ 604</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in warranty reserve balance from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 64.0
Question: what was the value in 2008?
Answer: 540.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.11852 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 8 . goodwill and in-process research and development ( continued ) the company has no accumulated impairment losses on goodwill . the company performed a step 0 qualitative assessment during the annual impairment review for fiscal 2015 as of october 31 , 2014 and concluded that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the company 2019s single reporting unit is less than its carrying amount . therefore , the two-step goodwill impairment test for the reporting unit was not necessary in fiscal 2015 . as described in note 3 . 201cacquisitions , 201d in july 2014 , the company acquired ecp and ais and recorded $ 18.5 million of ipr&d . the estimated fair value of the ipr&d was determined using a probability-weighted income approach , which discounts expected future cash flows to present value . the projected cash flows from the expandable catheter pump technology were based on certain key assumptions , including estimates of future revenue and expenses , taking into account the stage of development of the technology at the acquisition date and the time and resources needed to complete development . the company used a discount rate of 22.5% ( 22.5 % ) and cash flows that have been probability adjusted to reflect the risks of product commercialization , which the company believes are appropriate and representative of market participant assumptions . the carrying value of the company 2019s ipr&d assets and the change in the balance for the year ended march 31 , 2015 is as follows : march 31 , ( in $ 000 2019s ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>march 31 2015 ( in $ 000 2019s )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions</td><td>18500</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign currency translation impact</td><td>-3789 ( 3789 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 14711</td></tr></table> note 9 . stockholders 2019 equity class b preferred stock the company has authorized 1000000 shares of class b preferred stock , $ .01 par value , of which the board of directors can set the designation , rights and privileges . no shares of class b preferred stock have been issued or are outstanding . stock repurchase program in november 2012 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $ 15.0 million of its common stock . the company financed the stock repurchase program with its available cash . during the year ended march 31 , 2013 , the company repurchased 1123587 shares for $ 15.0 million in open market purchases at an average cost of $ 13.39 per share , including commission expense . the company completed the purchase of common stock under this stock repurchase program in january 2013 . note 10 . stock award plans and stock-based compensation stock award plans the company grants stock options and restricted stock awards to employees and others . all outstanding stock options of the company as of march 31 , 2015 were granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant . outstanding stock options , if not exercised , expire 10 years from the date of grant . the company 2019s 2008 stock incentive plan ( the 201cplan 201d ) authorizes the grant of a variety of equity awards to the company 2019s officers , directors , employees , consultants and advisers , including awards of unrestricted and restricted stock , restricted stock units , incentive and nonqualified stock options to purchase shares of common stock , performance share awards and stock appreciation rights . the plan provides that options may only be granted at the current market value on the date of grant . each share of stock issued pursuant to a stock option or stock appreciation right counts as one share against the maximum number of shares issuable under the plan , while each share of stock issued .
Question: what was the ending balance of ipr&d assets as of 12/31/15?
| 14711.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 8 . goodwill and in-process research and development ( continued ) the company has no accumulated impairment losses on goodwill . the company performed a step 0 qualitative assessment during the annual impairment review for fiscal 2015 as of october 31 , 2014 and concluded that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the company 2019s single reporting unit is less than its carrying amount . therefore , the two-step goodwill impairment test for the reporting unit was not necessary in fiscal 2015 . as described in note 3 . 201cacquisitions , 201d in july 2014 , the company acquired ecp and ais and recorded $ 18.5 million of ipr&d . the estimated fair value of the ipr&d was determined using a probability-weighted income approach , which discounts expected future cash flows to present value . the projected cash flows from the expandable catheter pump technology were based on certain key assumptions , including estimates of future revenue and expenses , taking into account the stage of development of the technology at the acquisition date and the time and resources needed to complete development . the company used a discount rate of 22.5% ( 22.5 % ) and cash flows that have been probability adjusted to reflect the risks of product commercialization , which the company believes are appropriate and representative of market participant assumptions . the carrying value of the company 2019s ipr&d assets and the change in the balance for the year ended march 31 , 2015 is as follows : march 31 , ( in $ 000 2019s ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>march 31 2015 ( in $ 000 2019s )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions</td><td>18500</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign currency translation impact</td><td>-3789 ( 3789 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 14711</td></tr></table> note 9 . stockholders 2019 equity class b preferred stock the company has authorized 1000000 shares of class b preferred stock , $ .01 par value , of which the board of directors can set the designation , rights and privileges . no shares of class b preferred stock have been issued or are outstanding . stock repurchase program in november 2012 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $ 15.0 million of its common stock . the company financed the stock repurchase program with its available cash . during the year ended march 31 , 2013 , the company repurchased 1123587 shares for $ 15.0 million in open market purchases at an average cost of $ 13.39 per share , including commission expense . the company completed the purchase of common stock under this stock repurchase program in january 2013 . note 10 . stock award plans and stock-based compensation stock award plans the company grants stock options and restricted stock awards to employees and others . all outstanding stock options of the company as of march 31 , 2015 were granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant . outstanding stock options , if not exercised , expire 10 years from the date of grant . the company 2019s 2008 stock incentive plan ( the 201cplan 201d ) authorizes the grant of a variety of equity awards to the company 2019s officers , directors , employees , consultants and advisers , including awards of unrestricted and restricted stock , restricted stock units , incentive and nonqualified stock options to purchase shares of common stock , performance share awards and stock appreciation rights . the plan provides that options may only be granted at the current market value on the date of grant . each share of stock issued pursuant to a stock option or stock appreciation right counts as one share against the maximum number of shares issuable under the plan , while each share of stock issued .
Question: what was the ending balance of ipr&d assets as of 12/31/15?
Answer: 14711.0
Question: and the foreign currency translation impact?
| 3789.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 8 . goodwill and in-process research and development ( continued ) the company has no accumulated impairment losses on goodwill . the company performed a step 0 qualitative assessment during the annual impairment review for fiscal 2015 as of october 31 , 2014 and concluded that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the company 2019s single reporting unit is less than its carrying amount . therefore , the two-step goodwill impairment test for the reporting unit was not necessary in fiscal 2015 . as described in note 3 . 201cacquisitions , 201d in july 2014 , the company acquired ecp and ais and recorded $ 18.5 million of ipr&d . the estimated fair value of the ipr&d was determined using a probability-weighted income approach , which discounts expected future cash flows to present value . the projected cash flows from the expandable catheter pump technology were based on certain key assumptions , including estimates of future revenue and expenses , taking into account the stage of development of the technology at the acquisition date and the time and resources needed to complete development . the company used a discount rate of 22.5% ( 22.5 % ) and cash flows that have been probability adjusted to reflect the risks of product commercialization , which the company believes are appropriate and representative of market participant assumptions . the carrying value of the company 2019s ipr&d assets and the change in the balance for the year ended march 31 , 2015 is as follows : march 31 , ( in $ 000 2019s ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>march 31 2015 ( in $ 000 2019s )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions</td><td>18500</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign currency translation impact</td><td>-3789 ( 3789 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 14711</td></tr></table> note 9 . stockholders 2019 equity class b preferred stock the company has authorized 1000000 shares of class b preferred stock , $ .01 par value , of which the board of directors can set the designation , rights and privileges . no shares of class b preferred stock have been issued or are outstanding . stock repurchase program in november 2012 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $ 15.0 million of its common stock . the company financed the stock repurchase program with its available cash . during the year ended march 31 , 2013 , the company repurchased 1123587 shares for $ 15.0 million in open market purchases at an average cost of $ 13.39 per share , including commission expense . the company completed the purchase of common stock under this stock repurchase program in january 2013 . note 10 . stock award plans and stock-based compensation stock award plans the company grants stock options and restricted stock awards to employees and others . all outstanding stock options of the company as of march 31 , 2015 were granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant . outstanding stock options , if not exercised , expire 10 years from the date of grant . the company 2019s 2008 stock incentive plan ( the 201cplan 201d ) authorizes the grant of a variety of equity awards to the company 2019s officers , directors , employees , consultants and advisers , including awards of unrestricted and restricted stock , restricted stock units , incentive and nonqualified stock options to purchase shares of common stock , performance share awards and stock appreciation rights . the plan provides that options may only be granted at the current market value on the date of grant . each share of stock issued pursuant to a stock option or stock appreciation right counts as one share against the maximum number of shares issuable under the plan , while each share of stock issued .
Question: what was the ending balance of ipr&d assets as of 12/31/15?
Answer: 14711.0
Question: and the foreign currency translation impact?
Answer: 3789.0
Question: considering this impact, what was the value of assets?
| 10922.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 8 . goodwill and in-process research and development ( continued ) the company has no accumulated impairment losses on goodwill . the company performed a step 0 qualitative assessment during the annual impairment review for fiscal 2015 as of october 31 , 2014 and concluded that it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the company 2019s single reporting unit is less than its carrying amount . therefore , the two-step goodwill impairment test for the reporting unit was not necessary in fiscal 2015 . as described in note 3 . 201cacquisitions , 201d in july 2014 , the company acquired ecp and ais and recorded $ 18.5 million of ipr&d . the estimated fair value of the ipr&d was determined using a probability-weighted income approach , which discounts expected future cash flows to present value . the projected cash flows from the expandable catheter pump technology were based on certain key assumptions , including estimates of future revenue and expenses , taking into account the stage of development of the technology at the acquisition date and the time and resources needed to complete development . the company used a discount rate of 22.5% ( 22.5 % ) and cash flows that have been probability adjusted to reflect the risks of product commercialization , which the company believes are appropriate and representative of market participant assumptions . the carrying value of the company 2019s ipr&d assets and the change in the balance for the year ended march 31 , 2015 is as follows : march 31 , ( in $ 000 2019s ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>march 31 2015 ( in $ 000 2019s )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions</td><td>18500</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign currency translation impact</td><td>-3789 ( 3789 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 14711</td></tr></table> note 9 . stockholders 2019 equity class b preferred stock the company has authorized 1000000 shares of class b preferred stock , $ .01 par value , of which the board of directors can set the designation , rights and privileges . no shares of class b preferred stock have been issued or are outstanding . stock repurchase program in november 2012 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $ 15.0 million of its common stock . the company financed the stock repurchase program with its available cash . during the year ended march 31 , 2013 , the company repurchased 1123587 shares for $ 15.0 million in open market purchases at an average cost of $ 13.39 per share , including commission expense . the company completed the purchase of common stock under this stock repurchase program in january 2013 . note 10 . stock award plans and stock-based compensation stock award plans the company grants stock options and restricted stock awards to employees and others . all outstanding stock options of the company as of march 31 , 2015 were granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant . outstanding stock options , if not exercised , expire 10 years from the date of grant . the company 2019s 2008 stock incentive plan ( the 201cplan 201d ) authorizes the grant of a variety of equity awards to the company 2019s officers , directors , employees , consultants and advisers , including awards of unrestricted and restricted stock , restricted stock units , incentive and nonqualified stock options to purchase shares of common stock , performance share awards and stock appreciation rights . the plan provides that options may only be granted at the current market value on the date of grant . each share of stock issued pursuant to a stock option or stock appreciation right counts as one share against the maximum number of shares issuable under the plan , while each share of stock issued .
Question: what was the ending balance of ipr&d assets as of 12/31/15?
Answer: 14711.0
Question: and the foreign currency translation impact?
Answer: 3789.0
Question: considering this impact, what was the value of assets?
Answer: 10922.0
Question: and converted into the millions?
| 10922000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
we measure cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities reduced by expenditures for property additions . we use this non-gaap financial measure of cash flow to focus management and investors on the amount of cash available for debt repayment , dividend distributions , acquisition opportunities , and share repurchases . our cash flow metric is reconciled to the most comparable gaap measure , as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 1758</td><td>$ 1595</td><td>$ 1008</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions to properties</td><td>-533 ( 533 )</td><td>-594 ( 594 )</td><td>-474 ( 474 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash flow</td><td>$ 1225</td><td>$ 1001</td><td>$ 534</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>year-over-year change</td><td>22.4% ( 22.4 % )</td><td>87.5% ( 87.5 % )</td><td>-</td></tr></table> year-over-year change 22.4 % ( % ) 87.5 % ( % ) year-over-year changes in cash flow ( as defined ) were driven by improved performance in working capital resulting from the benefit derived from the pringles acquisition , as well as changes in the level of capital expenditures during the three-year period . investing activities our net cash used in investing activities for 2012 amounted to $ 3245 million , an increase of $ 2658 million compared with 2011 primarily attributable to the $ 2668 acquisition of pringles in capital spending in 2012 included investments in our supply chain infrastructure , and to support capacity requirements in certain markets , including pringles . in addition , we continued the investment in our information technology infrastructure related to the reimplementation and upgrade of our sap platform . net cash used in investing activities of $ 587 million in 2011 increased by $ 122 million compared with 2010 , reflecting capital projects for our reimplementation and upgrade of our sap platform and investments in our supply chain . cash paid for additions to properties as a percentage of net sales has decreased to 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) in 2012 , from 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) in 2011 , which was an increase from 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) in financing activities in february 2013 , we issued $ 250 million of two-year floating-rate u.s . dollar notes , and $ 400 million of ten-year 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) u.s . dollar notes . the proceeds from these notes will be used for general corporate purposes , including , together with cash on hand , repayment of the $ 750 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) u.s . dollar notes due march 2013 . the floating-rate notes bear interest equal to three-month libor plus 23 basis points , subject to quarterly reset . the notes contain customary covenants that limit the ability of kellogg company and its restricted subsidiaries ( as defined ) to incur certain liens or enter into certain sale and lease-back transactions , as well as a change of control provision . our net cash provided by financing activities was $ 1317 for 2012 , compared to net cash used in financing activities of $ 957 and $ 439 for 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the increase in cash provided from financing activities in 2012 compared to 2011 and 2010 , was primarily due to the issuance of debt related to the acquisition of pringles . total debt was $ 7.9 billion at year-end 2012 and $ 6.0 billion at year-end 2011 . in march 2012 , we entered into interest rate swaps on our $ 500 million five-year 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 , $ 500 million ten-year 4.15% ( 4.15 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2019 and $ 500 million of our $ 750 million seven-year 4.45% ( 4.45 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 . the interest rate swaps effectively converted these notes from their fixed rates to floating rate obligations through maturity . in may 2012 , we issued $ 350 million of three-year 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes , $ 400 million of five-year 1.75% ( 1.75 % ) u.s . dollar notes and $ 700 million of ten-year 3.125% ( 3.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes , resulting in aggregate net proceeds after debt discount of $ 1.442 billion . the proceeds of these notes were used for general corporate purposes , including financing a portion of the acquisition of pringles . in may 2012 , we issued cdn . $ 300 million of two-year 2.10% ( 2.10 % ) fixed rate canadian dollar notes , using the proceeds from these notes for general corporate purposes , which included repayment of intercompany debt . this repayment resulted in cash available to be used for a portion of the acquisition of pringles . in december 2012 , we repaid $ 750 million five-year 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes at maturity with commercial paper . in february 2011 , we entered into interest rate swaps on $ 200 million of our $ 750 million seven-year 4.45% ( 4.45 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 . the interest rate swaps effectively converted this portion of the notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in april 2011 , we repaid $ 945 million ten-year 6.60% ( 6.60 % ) u.s . dollar notes at maturity with commercial paper . in may 2011 , we issued $ 400 million of seven-year 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes , using the proceeds of $ 397 million for general corporate purposes and repayment of commercial paper . during 2011 , we entered into interest rate swaps with notional amounts totaling $ 400 million , which effectively converted these notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in november 2011 , we issued $ 500 million of five-year 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) fixed rate u . s . dollar notes , using the proceeds of $ 498 million for general corporate purposes and repayment of commercial paper . during 2012 , we entered into interest rate swaps which effectively converted these notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in april 2010 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock amounting to $ 2.5 billion during 2010 through 2012 . this three year authorization replaced previous share buyback programs which had authorized stock repurchases of up to $ 1.1 billion for 2010 and $ 650 million for 2009 . under this program , we repurchased approximately 1 million , 15 million and 21 million shares of common stock for $ 63 million , $ 793 million and $ 1.1 billion during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . in december 2012 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock amounting to $ 300 million during 2013 . we paid quarterly dividends to shareholders totaling $ 1.74 per share in 2012 , $ 1.67 per share in 2011 and $ 1.56 per share in 2010 . total cash paid for dividends increased by 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2012 and 3.4% ( 3.4 % ) in 2011 . in march 2011 , we entered into an unsecured four- year credit agreement which allows us to borrow , on a revolving credit basis , up to $ 2.0 billion . our long-term debt agreements contain customary covenants that limit kellogg company and some of its subsidiaries from incurring certain liens or from entering into certain sale and lease-back transactions . some agreements also contain change in control provisions . however , they do not contain acceleration of maturity clauses that are dependent on credit ratings . a change in our credit ratings could limit our access to the u.s . short-term debt market and/or increase the cost of refinancing long-term debt in the future . however , even under these circumstances , we would continue to have access to our four-year credit agreement , which expires in march 2015 . this source of liquidity is unused and available on an unsecured basis , although we do not currently plan to use it . capital and credit markets , including commercial paper markets , continued to experience instability and disruption as the u.s . and global economies underwent a period of extreme uncertainty . throughout this period of uncertainty , we continued to have access to the u.s. , european , and canadian commercial paper markets . our commercial paper and term debt credit ratings were not affected by the changes in the credit environment . we monitor the financial strength of our third-party financial institutions , including those that hold our cash and cash equivalents as well as those who serve as counterparties to our credit facilities , our derivative financial instruments , and other arrangements . we are in compliance with all covenants as of december 29 , 2012 . we continue to believe that we will be able to meet our interest and principal repayment obligations and maintain our debt covenants for the foreseeable future , while still meeting our operational needs , including the pursuit of selected bolt-on acquisitions . this will be accomplished through our strong cash flow , our short- term borrowings , and our maintenance of credit facilities on a global basis. .
Question: what was the sum of the cash flows for 2011 and 2012?
| 2226.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
we measure cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities reduced by expenditures for property additions . we use this non-gaap financial measure of cash flow to focus management and investors on the amount of cash available for debt repayment , dividend distributions , acquisition opportunities , and share repurchases . our cash flow metric is reconciled to the most comparable gaap measure , as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 1758</td><td>$ 1595</td><td>$ 1008</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions to properties</td><td>-533 ( 533 )</td><td>-594 ( 594 )</td><td>-474 ( 474 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash flow</td><td>$ 1225</td><td>$ 1001</td><td>$ 534</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>year-over-year change</td><td>22.4% ( 22.4 % )</td><td>87.5% ( 87.5 % )</td><td>-</td></tr></table> year-over-year change 22.4 % ( % ) 87.5 % ( % ) year-over-year changes in cash flow ( as defined ) were driven by improved performance in working capital resulting from the benefit derived from the pringles acquisition , as well as changes in the level of capital expenditures during the three-year period . investing activities our net cash used in investing activities for 2012 amounted to $ 3245 million , an increase of $ 2658 million compared with 2011 primarily attributable to the $ 2668 acquisition of pringles in capital spending in 2012 included investments in our supply chain infrastructure , and to support capacity requirements in certain markets , including pringles . in addition , we continued the investment in our information technology infrastructure related to the reimplementation and upgrade of our sap platform . net cash used in investing activities of $ 587 million in 2011 increased by $ 122 million compared with 2010 , reflecting capital projects for our reimplementation and upgrade of our sap platform and investments in our supply chain . cash paid for additions to properties as a percentage of net sales has decreased to 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) in 2012 , from 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) in 2011 , which was an increase from 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) in financing activities in february 2013 , we issued $ 250 million of two-year floating-rate u.s . dollar notes , and $ 400 million of ten-year 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) u.s . dollar notes . the proceeds from these notes will be used for general corporate purposes , including , together with cash on hand , repayment of the $ 750 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) u.s . dollar notes due march 2013 . the floating-rate notes bear interest equal to three-month libor plus 23 basis points , subject to quarterly reset . the notes contain customary covenants that limit the ability of kellogg company and its restricted subsidiaries ( as defined ) to incur certain liens or enter into certain sale and lease-back transactions , as well as a change of control provision . our net cash provided by financing activities was $ 1317 for 2012 , compared to net cash used in financing activities of $ 957 and $ 439 for 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the increase in cash provided from financing activities in 2012 compared to 2011 and 2010 , was primarily due to the issuance of debt related to the acquisition of pringles . total debt was $ 7.9 billion at year-end 2012 and $ 6.0 billion at year-end 2011 . in march 2012 , we entered into interest rate swaps on our $ 500 million five-year 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 , $ 500 million ten-year 4.15% ( 4.15 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2019 and $ 500 million of our $ 750 million seven-year 4.45% ( 4.45 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 . the interest rate swaps effectively converted these notes from their fixed rates to floating rate obligations through maturity . in may 2012 , we issued $ 350 million of three-year 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes , $ 400 million of five-year 1.75% ( 1.75 % ) u.s . dollar notes and $ 700 million of ten-year 3.125% ( 3.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes , resulting in aggregate net proceeds after debt discount of $ 1.442 billion . the proceeds of these notes were used for general corporate purposes , including financing a portion of the acquisition of pringles . in may 2012 , we issued cdn . $ 300 million of two-year 2.10% ( 2.10 % ) fixed rate canadian dollar notes , using the proceeds from these notes for general corporate purposes , which included repayment of intercompany debt . this repayment resulted in cash available to be used for a portion of the acquisition of pringles . in december 2012 , we repaid $ 750 million five-year 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes at maturity with commercial paper . in february 2011 , we entered into interest rate swaps on $ 200 million of our $ 750 million seven-year 4.45% ( 4.45 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 . the interest rate swaps effectively converted this portion of the notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in april 2011 , we repaid $ 945 million ten-year 6.60% ( 6.60 % ) u.s . dollar notes at maturity with commercial paper . in may 2011 , we issued $ 400 million of seven-year 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes , using the proceeds of $ 397 million for general corporate purposes and repayment of commercial paper . during 2011 , we entered into interest rate swaps with notional amounts totaling $ 400 million , which effectively converted these notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in november 2011 , we issued $ 500 million of five-year 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) fixed rate u . s . dollar notes , using the proceeds of $ 498 million for general corporate purposes and repayment of commercial paper . during 2012 , we entered into interest rate swaps which effectively converted these notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in april 2010 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock amounting to $ 2.5 billion during 2010 through 2012 . this three year authorization replaced previous share buyback programs which had authorized stock repurchases of up to $ 1.1 billion for 2010 and $ 650 million for 2009 . under this program , we repurchased approximately 1 million , 15 million and 21 million shares of common stock for $ 63 million , $ 793 million and $ 1.1 billion during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . in december 2012 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock amounting to $ 300 million during 2013 . we paid quarterly dividends to shareholders totaling $ 1.74 per share in 2012 , $ 1.67 per share in 2011 and $ 1.56 per share in 2010 . total cash paid for dividends increased by 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2012 and 3.4% ( 3.4 % ) in 2011 . in march 2011 , we entered into an unsecured four- year credit agreement which allows us to borrow , on a revolving credit basis , up to $ 2.0 billion . our long-term debt agreements contain customary covenants that limit kellogg company and some of its subsidiaries from incurring certain liens or from entering into certain sale and lease-back transactions . some agreements also contain change in control provisions . however , they do not contain acceleration of maturity clauses that are dependent on credit ratings . a change in our credit ratings could limit our access to the u.s . short-term debt market and/or increase the cost of refinancing long-term debt in the future . however , even under these circumstances , we would continue to have access to our four-year credit agreement , which expires in march 2015 . this source of liquidity is unused and available on an unsecured basis , although we do not currently plan to use it . capital and credit markets , including commercial paper markets , continued to experience instability and disruption as the u.s . and global economies underwent a period of extreme uncertainty . throughout this period of uncertainty , we continued to have access to the u.s. , european , and canadian commercial paper markets . our commercial paper and term debt credit ratings were not affected by the changes in the credit environment . we monitor the financial strength of our third-party financial institutions , including those that hold our cash and cash equivalents as well as those who serve as counterparties to our credit facilities , our derivative financial instruments , and other arrangements . we are in compliance with all covenants as of december 29 , 2012 . we continue to believe that we will be able to meet our interest and principal repayment obligations and maintain our debt covenants for the foreseeable future , while still meeting our operational needs , including the pursuit of selected bolt-on acquisitions . this will be accomplished through our strong cash flow , our short- term borrowings , and our maintenance of credit facilities on a global basis. .
Question: what was the sum of the cash flows for 2011 and 2012?
Answer: 2226.0
Question: what is the value of cash flows in 2010?
| 534.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
we measure cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities reduced by expenditures for property additions . we use this non-gaap financial measure of cash flow to focus management and investors on the amount of cash available for debt repayment , dividend distributions , acquisition opportunities , and share repurchases . our cash flow metric is reconciled to the most comparable gaap measure , as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 1758</td><td>$ 1595</td><td>$ 1008</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions to properties</td><td>-533 ( 533 )</td><td>-594 ( 594 )</td><td>-474 ( 474 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash flow</td><td>$ 1225</td><td>$ 1001</td><td>$ 534</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>year-over-year change</td><td>22.4% ( 22.4 % )</td><td>87.5% ( 87.5 % )</td><td>-</td></tr></table> year-over-year change 22.4 % ( % ) 87.5 % ( % ) year-over-year changes in cash flow ( as defined ) were driven by improved performance in working capital resulting from the benefit derived from the pringles acquisition , as well as changes in the level of capital expenditures during the three-year period . investing activities our net cash used in investing activities for 2012 amounted to $ 3245 million , an increase of $ 2658 million compared with 2011 primarily attributable to the $ 2668 acquisition of pringles in capital spending in 2012 included investments in our supply chain infrastructure , and to support capacity requirements in certain markets , including pringles . in addition , we continued the investment in our information technology infrastructure related to the reimplementation and upgrade of our sap platform . net cash used in investing activities of $ 587 million in 2011 increased by $ 122 million compared with 2010 , reflecting capital projects for our reimplementation and upgrade of our sap platform and investments in our supply chain . cash paid for additions to properties as a percentage of net sales has decreased to 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) in 2012 , from 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) in 2011 , which was an increase from 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) in financing activities in february 2013 , we issued $ 250 million of two-year floating-rate u.s . dollar notes , and $ 400 million of ten-year 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) u.s . dollar notes . the proceeds from these notes will be used for general corporate purposes , including , together with cash on hand , repayment of the $ 750 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) u.s . dollar notes due march 2013 . the floating-rate notes bear interest equal to three-month libor plus 23 basis points , subject to quarterly reset . the notes contain customary covenants that limit the ability of kellogg company and its restricted subsidiaries ( as defined ) to incur certain liens or enter into certain sale and lease-back transactions , as well as a change of control provision . our net cash provided by financing activities was $ 1317 for 2012 , compared to net cash used in financing activities of $ 957 and $ 439 for 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the increase in cash provided from financing activities in 2012 compared to 2011 and 2010 , was primarily due to the issuance of debt related to the acquisition of pringles . total debt was $ 7.9 billion at year-end 2012 and $ 6.0 billion at year-end 2011 . in march 2012 , we entered into interest rate swaps on our $ 500 million five-year 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 , $ 500 million ten-year 4.15% ( 4.15 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2019 and $ 500 million of our $ 750 million seven-year 4.45% ( 4.45 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 . the interest rate swaps effectively converted these notes from their fixed rates to floating rate obligations through maturity . in may 2012 , we issued $ 350 million of three-year 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes , $ 400 million of five-year 1.75% ( 1.75 % ) u.s . dollar notes and $ 700 million of ten-year 3.125% ( 3.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes , resulting in aggregate net proceeds after debt discount of $ 1.442 billion . the proceeds of these notes were used for general corporate purposes , including financing a portion of the acquisition of pringles . in may 2012 , we issued cdn . $ 300 million of two-year 2.10% ( 2.10 % ) fixed rate canadian dollar notes , using the proceeds from these notes for general corporate purposes , which included repayment of intercompany debt . this repayment resulted in cash available to be used for a portion of the acquisition of pringles . in december 2012 , we repaid $ 750 million five-year 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes at maturity with commercial paper . in february 2011 , we entered into interest rate swaps on $ 200 million of our $ 750 million seven-year 4.45% ( 4.45 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 . the interest rate swaps effectively converted this portion of the notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in april 2011 , we repaid $ 945 million ten-year 6.60% ( 6.60 % ) u.s . dollar notes at maturity with commercial paper . in may 2011 , we issued $ 400 million of seven-year 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes , using the proceeds of $ 397 million for general corporate purposes and repayment of commercial paper . during 2011 , we entered into interest rate swaps with notional amounts totaling $ 400 million , which effectively converted these notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in november 2011 , we issued $ 500 million of five-year 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) fixed rate u . s . dollar notes , using the proceeds of $ 498 million for general corporate purposes and repayment of commercial paper . during 2012 , we entered into interest rate swaps which effectively converted these notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in april 2010 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock amounting to $ 2.5 billion during 2010 through 2012 . this three year authorization replaced previous share buyback programs which had authorized stock repurchases of up to $ 1.1 billion for 2010 and $ 650 million for 2009 . under this program , we repurchased approximately 1 million , 15 million and 21 million shares of common stock for $ 63 million , $ 793 million and $ 1.1 billion during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . in december 2012 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock amounting to $ 300 million during 2013 . we paid quarterly dividends to shareholders totaling $ 1.74 per share in 2012 , $ 1.67 per share in 2011 and $ 1.56 per share in 2010 . total cash paid for dividends increased by 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2012 and 3.4% ( 3.4 % ) in 2011 . in march 2011 , we entered into an unsecured four- year credit agreement which allows us to borrow , on a revolving credit basis , up to $ 2.0 billion . our long-term debt agreements contain customary covenants that limit kellogg company and some of its subsidiaries from incurring certain liens or from entering into certain sale and lease-back transactions . some agreements also contain change in control provisions . however , they do not contain acceleration of maturity clauses that are dependent on credit ratings . a change in our credit ratings could limit our access to the u.s . short-term debt market and/or increase the cost of refinancing long-term debt in the future . however , even under these circumstances , we would continue to have access to our four-year credit agreement , which expires in march 2015 . this source of liquidity is unused and available on an unsecured basis , although we do not currently plan to use it . capital and credit markets , including commercial paper markets , continued to experience instability and disruption as the u.s . and global economies underwent a period of extreme uncertainty . throughout this period of uncertainty , we continued to have access to the u.s. , european , and canadian commercial paper markets . our commercial paper and term debt credit ratings were not affected by the changes in the credit environment . we monitor the financial strength of our third-party financial institutions , including those that hold our cash and cash equivalents as well as those who serve as counterparties to our credit facilities , our derivative financial instruments , and other arrangements . we are in compliance with all covenants as of december 29 , 2012 . we continue to believe that we will be able to meet our interest and principal repayment obligations and maintain our debt covenants for the foreseeable future , while still meeting our operational needs , including the pursuit of selected bolt-on acquisitions . this will be accomplished through our strong cash flow , our short- term borrowings , and our maintenance of credit facilities on a global basis. .
Question: what was the sum of the cash flows for 2011 and 2012?
Answer: 2226.0
Question: what is the value of cash flows in 2010?
Answer: 534.0
Question: what is the sum of all 3 years?
| 2760.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
we measure cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities reduced by expenditures for property additions . we use this non-gaap financial measure of cash flow to focus management and investors on the amount of cash available for debt repayment , dividend distributions , acquisition opportunities , and share repurchases . our cash flow metric is reconciled to the most comparable gaap measure , as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 1758</td><td>$ 1595</td><td>$ 1008</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions to properties</td><td>-533 ( 533 )</td><td>-594 ( 594 )</td><td>-474 ( 474 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>cash flow</td><td>$ 1225</td><td>$ 1001</td><td>$ 534</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>year-over-year change</td><td>22.4% ( 22.4 % )</td><td>87.5% ( 87.5 % )</td><td>-</td></tr></table> year-over-year change 22.4 % ( % ) 87.5 % ( % ) year-over-year changes in cash flow ( as defined ) were driven by improved performance in working capital resulting from the benefit derived from the pringles acquisition , as well as changes in the level of capital expenditures during the three-year period . investing activities our net cash used in investing activities for 2012 amounted to $ 3245 million , an increase of $ 2658 million compared with 2011 primarily attributable to the $ 2668 acquisition of pringles in capital spending in 2012 included investments in our supply chain infrastructure , and to support capacity requirements in certain markets , including pringles . in addition , we continued the investment in our information technology infrastructure related to the reimplementation and upgrade of our sap platform . net cash used in investing activities of $ 587 million in 2011 increased by $ 122 million compared with 2010 , reflecting capital projects for our reimplementation and upgrade of our sap platform and investments in our supply chain . cash paid for additions to properties as a percentage of net sales has decreased to 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) in 2012 , from 4.5% ( 4.5 % ) in 2011 , which was an increase from 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) in financing activities in february 2013 , we issued $ 250 million of two-year floating-rate u.s . dollar notes , and $ 400 million of ten-year 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) u.s . dollar notes . the proceeds from these notes will be used for general corporate purposes , including , together with cash on hand , repayment of the $ 750 million aggregate principal amount of our 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) u.s . dollar notes due march 2013 . the floating-rate notes bear interest equal to three-month libor plus 23 basis points , subject to quarterly reset . the notes contain customary covenants that limit the ability of kellogg company and its restricted subsidiaries ( as defined ) to incur certain liens or enter into certain sale and lease-back transactions , as well as a change of control provision . our net cash provided by financing activities was $ 1317 for 2012 , compared to net cash used in financing activities of $ 957 and $ 439 for 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the increase in cash provided from financing activities in 2012 compared to 2011 and 2010 , was primarily due to the issuance of debt related to the acquisition of pringles . total debt was $ 7.9 billion at year-end 2012 and $ 6.0 billion at year-end 2011 . in march 2012 , we entered into interest rate swaps on our $ 500 million five-year 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 , $ 500 million ten-year 4.15% ( 4.15 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2019 and $ 500 million of our $ 750 million seven-year 4.45% ( 4.45 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 . the interest rate swaps effectively converted these notes from their fixed rates to floating rate obligations through maturity . in may 2012 , we issued $ 350 million of three-year 1.125% ( 1.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes , $ 400 million of five-year 1.75% ( 1.75 % ) u.s . dollar notes and $ 700 million of ten-year 3.125% ( 3.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes , resulting in aggregate net proceeds after debt discount of $ 1.442 billion . the proceeds of these notes were used for general corporate purposes , including financing a portion of the acquisition of pringles . in may 2012 , we issued cdn . $ 300 million of two-year 2.10% ( 2.10 % ) fixed rate canadian dollar notes , using the proceeds from these notes for general corporate purposes , which included repayment of intercompany debt . this repayment resulted in cash available to be used for a portion of the acquisition of pringles . in december 2012 , we repaid $ 750 million five-year 5.125% ( 5.125 % ) u.s . dollar notes at maturity with commercial paper . in february 2011 , we entered into interest rate swaps on $ 200 million of our $ 750 million seven-year 4.45% ( 4.45 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes due 2016 . the interest rate swaps effectively converted this portion of the notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in april 2011 , we repaid $ 945 million ten-year 6.60% ( 6.60 % ) u.s . dollar notes at maturity with commercial paper . in may 2011 , we issued $ 400 million of seven-year 3.25% ( 3.25 % ) fixed rate u.s . dollar notes , using the proceeds of $ 397 million for general corporate purposes and repayment of commercial paper . during 2011 , we entered into interest rate swaps with notional amounts totaling $ 400 million , which effectively converted these notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in november 2011 , we issued $ 500 million of five-year 1.875% ( 1.875 % ) fixed rate u . s . dollar notes , using the proceeds of $ 498 million for general corporate purposes and repayment of commercial paper . during 2012 , we entered into interest rate swaps which effectively converted these notes from a fixed rate to a floating rate obligation through maturity . in april 2010 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock amounting to $ 2.5 billion during 2010 through 2012 . this three year authorization replaced previous share buyback programs which had authorized stock repurchases of up to $ 1.1 billion for 2010 and $ 650 million for 2009 . under this program , we repurchased approximately 1 million , 15 million and 21 million shares of common stock for $ 63 million , $ 793 million and $ 1.1 billion during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . in december 2012 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing us to repurchase shares of our common stock amounting to $ 300 million during 2013 . we paid quarterly dividends to shareholders totaling $ 1.74 per share in 2012 , $ 1.67 per share in 2011 and $ 1.56 per share in 2010 . total cash paid for dividends increased by 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) in 2012 and 3.4% ( 3.4 % ) in 2011 . in march 2011 , we entered into an unsecured four- year credit agreement which allows us to borrow , on a revolving credit basis , up to $ 2.0 billion . our long-term debt agreements contain customary covenants that limit kellogg company and some of its subsidiaries from incurring certain liens or from entering into certain sale and lease-back transactions . some agreements also contain change in control provisions . however , they do not contain acceleration of maturity clauses that are dependent on credit ratings . a change in our credit ratings could limit our access to the u.s . short-term debt market and/or increase the cost of refinancing long-term debt in the future . however , even under these circumstances , we would continue to have access to our four-year credit agreement , which expires in march 2015 . this source of liquidity is unused and available on an unsecured basis , although we do not currently plan to use it . capital and credit markets , including commercial paper markets , continued to experience instability and disruption as the u.s . and global economies underwent a period of extreme uncertainty . throughout this period of uncertainty , we continued to have access to the u.s. , european , and canadian commercial paper markets . our commercial paper and term debt credit ratings were not affected by the changes in the credit environment . we monitor the financial strength of our third-party financial institutions , including those that hold our cash and cash equivalents as well as those who serve as counterparties to our credit facilities , our derivative financial instruments , and other arrangements . we are in compliance with all covenants as of december 29 , 2012 . we continue to believe that we will be able to meet our interest and principal repayment obligations and maintain our debt covenants for the foreseeable future , while still meeting our operational needs , including the pursuit of selected bolt-on acquisitions . this will be accomplished through our strong cash flow , our short- term borrowings , and our maintenance of credit facilities on a global basis. .
Question: what was the sum of the cash flows for 2011 and 2012?
Answer: 2226.0
Question: what is the value of cash flows in 2010?
Answer: 534.0
Question: what is the sum of all 3 years?
Answer: 2760.0
Question: what is the average cash flow per year?
| 920.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from the sale of these notes was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the 201ccredit agreement 201d ) . the credit agreement provides for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into this credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the company has the ability to increase the size of the credit agreement by up to an additional $ 300 million , subject to the receipt of lender commitments and other conditions . the credit agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding will be due and payable on august 5 , 2013 . the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , 2011 ; however , the available borrowing rate on a one month , u.s . dollar denominated borrowing would have been 1.05 percent . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of 60 percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 679 million of which $ 36 million was used as of december 31 , 2011 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2011 2010 other , weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 , 2010 33 24 total $ 33 $ 24 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2011 , total indebtedness was 43 percent of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross-default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 212 million , $ 189 million and $ 201 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . in december 2008 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase 1.5 million 44 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 2010</td><td>33</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total</td><td>$ 33</td><td>$ 24</td></tr></table> notes to the consolidated financial statements at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from the sale of these notes was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the 201ccredit agreement 201d ) . the credit agreement provides for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into this credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the company has the ability to increase the size of the credit agreement by up to an additional $ 300 million , subject to the receipt of lender commitments and other conditions . the credit agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding will be due and payable on august 5 , 2013 . the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , 2011 ; however , the available borrowing rate on a one month , u.s . dollar denominated borrowing would have been 1.05 percent . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of 60 percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 679 million of which $ 36 million was used as of december 31 , 2011 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2011 2010 other , weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 , 2010 33 24 total $ 33 $ 24 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2011 , total indebtedness was 43 percent of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross-default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 212 million , $ 189 million and $ 201 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . in december 2008 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase 1.5 million 44 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .
Question: what were total interest payments in 2010?
| 189.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from the sale of these notes was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the 201ccredit agreement 201d ) . the credit agreement provides for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into this credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the company has the ability to increase the size of the credit agreement by up to an additional $ 300 million , subject to the receipt of lender commitments and other conditions . the credit agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding will be due and payable on august 5 , 2013 . the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , 2011 ; however , the available borrowing rate on a one month , u.s . dollar denominated borrowing would have been 1.05 percent . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of 60 percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 679 million of which $ 36 million was used as of december 31 , 2011 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2011 2010 other , weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 , 2010 33 24 total $ 33 $ 24 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2011 , total indebtedness was 43 percent of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross-default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 212 million , $ 189 million and $ 201 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . in december 2008 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase 1.5 million 44 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 2010</td><td>33</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total</td><td>$ 33</td><td>$ 24</td></tr></table> notes to the consolidated financial statements at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from the sale of these notes was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the 201ccredit agreement 201d ) . the credit agreement provides for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into this credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the company has the ability to increase the size of the credit agreement by up to an additional $ 300 million , subject to the receipt of lender commitments and other conditions . the credit agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding will be due and payable on august 5 , 2013 . the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , 2011 ; however , the available borrowing rate on a one month , u.s . dollar denominated borrowing would have been 1.05 percent . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of 60 percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 679 million of which $ 36 million was used as of december 31 , 2011 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2011 2010 other , weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 , 2010 33 24 total $ 33 $ 24 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2011 , total indebtedness was 43 percent of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross-default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 212 million , $ 189 million and $ 201 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . in december 2008 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase 1.5 million 44 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .
Question: what were total interest payments in 2010?
Answer: 189.0
Question: what were they in 2009?
| 201.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from the sale of these notes was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the 201ccredit agreement 201d ) . the credit agreement provides for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into this credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the company has the ability to increase the size of the credit agreement by up to an additional $ 300 million , subject to the receipt of lender commitments and other conditions . the credit agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding will be due and payable on august 5 , 2013 . the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , 2011 ; however , the available borrowing rate on a one month , u.s . dollar denominated borrowing would have been 1.05 percent . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of 60 percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 679 million of which $ 36 million was used as of december 31 , 2011 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2011 2010 other , weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 , 2010 33 24 total $ 33 $ 24 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2011 , total indebtedness was 43 percent of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross-default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 212 million , $ 189 million and $ 201 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . in december 2008 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase 1.5 million 44 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 2010</td><td>33</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total</td><td>$ 33</td><td>$ 24</td></tr></table> notes to the consolidated financial statements at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from the sale of these notes was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the 201ccredit agreement 201d ) . the credit agreement provides for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into this credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the company has the ability to increase the size of the credit agreement by up to an additional $ 300 million , subject to the receipt of lender commitments and other conditions . the credit agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding will be due and payable on august 5 , 2013 . the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , 2011 ; however , the available borrowing rate on a one month , u.s . dollar denominated borrowing would have been 1.05 percent . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of 60 percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 679 million of which $ 36 million was used as of december 31 , 2011 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2011 2010 other , weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 , 2010 33 24 total $ 33 $ 24 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2011 , total indebtedness was 43 percent of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross-default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 212 million , $ 189 million and $ 201 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . in december 2008 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase 1.5 million 44 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .
Question: what were total interest payments in 2010?
Answer: 189.0
Question: what were they in 2009?
Answer: 201.0
Question: what is the net change in values?
| -12.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from the sale of these notes was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the 201ccredit agreement 201d ) . the credit agreement provides for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into this credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the company has the ability to increase the size of the credit agreement by up to an additional $ 300 million , subject to the receipt of lender commitments and other conditions . the credit agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding will be due and payable on august 5 , 2013 . the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , 2011 ; however , the available borrowing rate on a one month , u.s . dollar denominated borrowing would have been 1.05 percent . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of 60 percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 679 million of which $ 36 million was used as of december 31 , 2011 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2011 2010 other , weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 , 2010 33 24 total $ 33 $ 24 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2011 , total indebtedness was 43 percent of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross-default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 212 million , $ 189 million and $ 201 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . in december 2008 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase 1.5 million 44 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 2010</td><td>33</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total</td><td>$ 33</td><td>$ 24</td></tr></table> notes to the consolidated financial statements at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from the sale of these notes was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the 201ccredit agreement 201d ) . the credit agreement provides for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into this credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the company has the ability to increase the size of the credit agreement by up to an additional $ 300 million , subject to the receipt of lender commitments and other conditions . the credit agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding will be due and payable on august 5 , 2013 . the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , 2011 ; however , the available borrowing rate on a one month , u.s . dollar denominated borrowing would have been 1.05 percent . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of 60 percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 679 million of which $ 36 million was used as of december 31 , 2011 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2011 2010 other , weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 , 2010 33 24 total $ 33 $ 24 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2011 , total indebtedness was 43 percent of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross-default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 212 million , $ 189 million and $ 201 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . in december 2008 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase 1.5 million 44 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .
Question: what were total interest payments in 2010?
Answer: 189.0
Question: what were they in 2009?
Answer: 201.0
Question: what is the net change in values?
Answer: -12.0
Question: what was the 2009 value?
| 201.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from the sale of these notes was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the 201ccredit agreement 201d ) . the credit agreement provides for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into this credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the company has the ability to increase the size of the credit agreement by up to an additional $ 300 million , subject to the receipt of lender commitments and other conditions . the credit agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding will be due and payable on august 5 , 2013 . the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , 2011 ; however , the available borrowing rate on a one month , u.s . dollar denominated borrowing would have been 1.05 percent . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of 60 percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 679 million of which $ 36 million was used as of december 31 , 2011 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2011 2010 other , weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 , 2010 33 24 total $ 33 $ 24 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2011 , total indebtedness was 43 percent of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross-default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 212 million , $ 189 million and $ 201 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . in december 2008 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase 1.5 million 44 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 2010</td><td>33</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total</td><td>$ 33</td><td>$ 24</td></tr></table> notes to the consolidated financial statements at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from the sale of these notes was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the 201ccredit agreement 201d ) . the credit agreement provides for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into this credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the company has the ability to increase the size of the credit agreement by up to an additional $ 300 million , subject to the receipt of lender commitments and other conditions . the credit agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding will be due and payable on august 5 , 2013 . the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , 2011 ; however , the available borrowing rate on a one month , u.s . dollar denominated borrowing would have been 1.05 percent . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of 60 percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 679 million of which $ 36 million was used as of december 31 , 2011 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2011 2010 other , weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 , 2010 33 24 total $ 33 $ 24 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2011 , total indebtedness was 43 percent of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross-default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 212 million , $ 189 million and $ 201 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . in december 2008 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase 1.5 million 44 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .
Question: what were total interest payments in 2010?
Answer: 189.0
Question: what were they in 2009?
Answer: 201.0
Question: what is the net change in values?
Answer: -12.0
Question: what was the 2009 value?
Answer: 201.0
Question: what is the net change divided by the 2009 value?
| -0.0597 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
changes in our performance retention awards during 2009 were as follows : shares ( thous. ) weighted-average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( thous. )</td><td>weighted-averagegrant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at january 1 2009</td><td>873</td><td>$ 50.70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>449</td><td>47.28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-240 ( 240 )</td><td>43.23</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td><td>53.86</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2009</td><td>1060</td><td>$ 50.88</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 22 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years . a portion of this expense is subject to achievement of the roic levels established for the performance stock unit grants . 5 . retirement plans pension and other postretirement benefits pension plans 2013 we provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through qualified and non-qualified ( supplemental ) pension plans . qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment , with specific reductions made for early retirements . other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) 2013 we provide defined contribution medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees . these benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are plan amendment effective january 1 , 2010 , medicare-eligible retirees who are enrolled in the union pacific retiree medical program will receive a contribution to a health reimbursement account , which can be used to pay eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses . the impact of the plan amendment is reflected in the projected benefit obligation ( pbo ) at december 31 , 2009 . funded status we are required by gaap to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and opeb plans as an asset or liability . the funded status represents the difference between the pbo and the fair value of the plan assets . the pbo is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants , including the effect of assumed future salary increases . the pbo of the opeb plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation , as the present value of the opeb liabilities is not affected by salary increases . plan assets are measured at fair value . we use a december 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans. .
Question: what was the amount of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards?
| 22.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
changes in our performance retention awards during 2009 were as follows : shares ( thous. ) weighted-average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( thous. )</td><td>weighted-averagegrant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at january 1 2009</td><td>873</td><td>$ 50.70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>449</td><td>47.28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-240 ( 240 )</td><td>43.23</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td><td>53.86</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2009</td><td>1060</td><td>$ 50.88</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 22 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years . a portion of this expense is subject to achievement of the roic levels established for the performance stock unit grants . 5 . retirement plans pension and other postretirement benefits pension plans 2013 we provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through qualified and non-qualified ( supplemental ) pension plans . qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment , with specific reductions made for early retirements . other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) 2013 we provide defined contribution medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees . these benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are plan amendment effective january 1 , 2010 , medicare-eligible retirees who are enrolled in the union pacific retiree medical program will receive a contribution to a health reimbursement account , which can be used to pay eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses . the impact of the plan amendment is reflected in the projected benefit obligation ( pbo ) at december 31 , 2009 . funded status we are required by gaap to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and opeb plans as an asset or liability . the funded status represents the difference between the pbo and the fair value of the plan assets . the pbo is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants , including the effect of assumed future salary increases . the pbo of the opeb plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation , as the present value of the opeb liabilities is not affected by salary increases . plan assets are measured at fair value . we use a december 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans. .
Question: what was the amount of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards?
Answer: 22.0
Question: and converted to the ten millions?
| 22000000.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
changes in our performance retention awards during 2009 were as follows : shares ( thous. ) weighted-average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( thous. )</td><td>weighted-averagegrant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at january 1 2009</td><td>873</td><td>$ 50.70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>449</td><td>47.28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-240 ( 240 )</td><td>43.23</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td><td>53.86</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2009</td><td>1060</td><td>$ 50.88</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 22 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years . a portion of this expense is subject to achievement of the roic levels established for the performance stock unit grants . 5 . retirement plans pension and other postretirement benefits pension plans 2013 we provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through qualified and non-qualified ( supplemental ) pension plans . qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment , with specific reductions made for early retirements . other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) 2013 we provide defined contribution medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees . these benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are plan amendment effective january 1 , 2010 , medicare-eligible retirees who are enrolled in the union pacific retiree medical program will receive a contribution to a health reimbursement account , which can be used to pay eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses . the impact of the plan amendment is reflected in the projected benefit obligation ( pbo ) at december 31 , 2009 . funded status we are required by gaap to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and opeb plans as an asset or liability . the funded status represents the difference between the pbo and the fair value of the plan assets . the pbo is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants , including the effect of assumed future salary increases . the pbo of the opeb plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation , as the present value of the opeb liabilities is not affected by salary increases . plan assets are measured at fair value . we use a december 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans. .
Question: what was the amount of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards?
Answer: 22.0
Question: and converted to the ten millions?
Answer: 22000000.0
Question: so what was the annual compensation expense for the remaining unvested performance retention awards?
| 16923076.92308 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
skyworks solutions , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) maintained a valuation allowance of $ 47.0 million . this valuation allowance is comprised of $ 33.6 million related to u.s . state tax credits , of which $ 3.6 million are state tax credits acquired from aati in fiscal year 2012 , and $ 13.4 million related to foreign deferred tax assets . if these benefits are recognized in a future period the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets will be reversed and up to a $ 46.6 million income tax benefit , and up to a $ 0.4 million reduction to goodwill may be recognized . the company will need to generate $ 209.0 million of future united states federal taxable income to utilize our united states deferred tax assets as of september 28 , 2012 . deferred tax assets are recognized for foreign operations when management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be recovered during the carry forward period . the company will continue to assess its valuation allowance in future periods . as of september 28 , 2012 , the company has united states federal net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $ 74.3 million , including $ 29.5 million related to the acquisition of sige , which will expire at various dates through 2030 and $ 28.1 million related to the acquisition of aati , which will expire at various dates through 2031 . the utilization of these net operating losses is subject to certain annual limitations as required under internal revenue code section 382 and similar state income tax provisions . the company also has united states federal income tax credit carry forwards of $ 37.8 million , of which $ 30.4 million of federal income tax credit carry forwards have not been recorded as a deferred tax asset . the company also has state income tax credit carry forwards of $ 33.6 million , for which the company has provided a valuation allowance . the united states federal tax credits expire at various dates through 2032 . the state tax credits relate primarily to california research tax credits which can be carried forward indefinitely . the company has continued to expand its operations and increase its investments in numerous international jurisdictions . these activities will increase the company 2019s earnings attributable to foreign jurisdictions . as of september 28 , 2012 , no provision has been made for united states federal , state , or additional foreign income taxes related to approximately $ 371.5 million of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries which have been or are intended to be permanently reinvested . it is not practicable to determine the united states federal income tax liability , if any , which would be payable if such earnings were not permanently reinvested . the company 2019s gross unrecognized tax benefits totaled $ 52.4 million and $ 32.1 million as of september 28 , 2012 and september 30 , 2011 , respectively . of the total unrecognized tax benefits at september 28 , 2012 , $ 38.8 million would impact the effective tax rate , if recognized . the remaining unrecognized tax benefits would not impact the effective tax rate , if recognized , due to the company 2019s valuation allowance and certain positions which were required to be capitalized . there are no positions which the company anticipates could change within the next twelve months . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : unrecognized tax benefits . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at september 30 2011</td><td>$ 32136</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases based on positions related to prior years</td><td>9004</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>increases based on positions related to current year</td><td>11265</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases relating to lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at september 28 2012</td><td>$ 52380</td></tr></table> page 114 annual report .
Question: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits as of september 28, 2012?
| 52380.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
skyworks solutions , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) maintained a valuation allowance of $ 47.0 million . this valuation allowance is comprised of $ 33.6 million related to u.s . state tax credits , of which $ 3.6 million are state tax credits acquired from aati in fiscal year 2012 , and $ 13.4 million related to foreign deferred tax assets . if these benefits are recognized in a future period the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets will be reversed and up to a $ 46.6 million income tax benefit , and up to a $ 0.4 million reduction to goodwill may be recognized . the company will need to generate $ 209.0 million of future united states federal taxable income to utilize our united states deferred tax assets as of september 28 , 2012 . deferred tax assets are recognized for foreign operations when management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be recovered during the carry forward period . the company will continue to assess its valuation allowance in future periods . as of september 28 , 2012 , the company has united states federal net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $ 74.3 million , including $ 29.5 million related to the acquisition of sige , which will expire at various dates through 2030 and $ 28.1 million related to the acquisition of aati , which will expire at various dates through 2031 . the utilization of these net operating losses is subject to certain annual limitations as required under internal revenue code section 382 and similar state income tax provisions . the company also has united states federal income tax credit carry forwards of $ 37.8 million , of which $ 30.4 million of federal income tax credit carry forwards have not been recorded as a deferred tax asset . the company also has state income tax credit carry forwards of $ 33.6 million , for which the company has provided a valuation allowance . the united states federal tax credits expire at various dates through 2032 . the state tax credits relate primarily to california research tax credits which can be carried forward indefinitely . the company has continued to expand its operations and increase its investments in numerous international jurisdictions . these activities will increase the company 2019s earnings attributable to foreign jurisdictions . as of september 28 , 2012 , no provision has been made for united states federal , state , or additional foreign income taxes related to approximately $ 371.5 million of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries which have been or are intended to be permanently reinvested . it is not practicable to determine the united states federal income tax liability , if any , which would be payable if such earnings were not permanently reinvested . the company 2019s gross unrecognized tax benefits totaled $ 52.4 million and $ 32.1 million as of september 28 , 2012 and september 30 , 2011 , respectively . of the total unrecognized tax benefits at september 28 , 2012 , $ 38.8 million would impact the effective tax rate , if recognized . the remaining unrecognized tax benefits would not impact the effective tax rate , if recognized , due to the company 2019s valuation allowance and certain positions which were required to be capitalized . there are no positions which the company anticipates could change within the next twelve months . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : unrecognized tax benefits . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at september 30 2011</td><td>$ 32136</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases based on positions related to prior years</td><td>9004</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>increases based on positions related to current year</td><td>11265</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases relating to lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at september 28 2012</td><td>$ 52380</td></tr></table> page 114 annual report .
Question: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits as of september 28, 2012?
Answer: 52380.0
Question: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits as of september 30, 2011?
| 32136.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
skyworks solutions , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) maintained a valuation allowance of $ 47.0 million . this valuation allowance is comprised of $ 33.6 million related to u.s . state tax credits , of which $ 3.6 million are state tax credits acquired from aati in fiscal year 2012 , and $ 13.4 million related to foreign deferred tax assets . if these benefits are recognized in a future period the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets will be reversed and up to a $ 46.6 million income tax benefit , and up to a $ 0.4 million reduction to goodwill may be recognized . the company will need to generate $ 209.0 million of future united states federal taxable income to utilize our united states deferred tax assets as of september 28 , 2012 . deferred tax assets are recognized for foreign operations when management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be recovered during the carry forward period . the company will continue to assess its valuation allowance in future periods . as of september 28 , 2012 , the company has united states federal net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $ 74.3 million , including $ 29.5 million related to the acquisition of sige , which will expire at various dates through 2030 and $ 28.1 million related to the acquisition of aati , which will expire at various dates through 2031 . the utilization of these net operating losses is subject to certain annual limitations as required under internal revenue code section 382 and similar state income tax provisions . the company also has united states federal income tax credit carry forwards of $ 37.8 million , of which $ 30.4 million of federal income tax credit carry forwards have not been recorded as a deferred tax asset . the company also has state income tax credit carry forwards of $ 33.6 million , for which the company has provided a valuation allowance . the united states federal tax credits expire at various dates through 2032 . the state tax credits relate primarily to california research tax credits which can be carried forward indefinitely . the company has continued to expand its operations and increase its investments in numerous international jurisdictions . these activities will increase the company 2019s earnings attributable to foreign jurisdictions . as of september 28 , 2012 , no provision has been made for united states federal , state , or additional foreign income taxes related to approximately $ 371.5 million of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries which have been or are intended to be permanently reinvested . it is not practicable to determine the united states federal income tax liability , if any , which would be payable if such earnings were not permanently reinvested . the company 2019s gross unrecognized tax benefits totaled $ 52.4 million and $ 32.1 million as of september 28 , 2012 and september 30 , 2011 , respectively . of the total unrecognized tax benefits at september 28 , 2012 , $ 38.8 million would impact the effective tax rate , if recognized . the remaining unrecognized tax benefits would not impact the effective tax rate , if recognized , due to the company 2019s valuation allowance and certain positions which were required to be capitalized . there are no positions which the company anticipates could change within the next twelve months . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : unrecognized tax benefits . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at september 30 2011</td><td>$ 32136</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases based on positions related to prior years</td><td>9004</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>increases based on positions related to current year</td><td>11265</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases relating to lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at september 28 2012</td><td>$ 52380</td></tr></table> page 114 annual report .
Question: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits as of september 28, 2012?
Answer: 52380.0
Question: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits as of september 30, 2011?
Answer: 32136.0
Question: what was the change in value?
| 20244.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
skyworks solutions , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) maintained a valuation allowance of $ 47.0 million . this valuation allowance is comprised of $ 33.6 million related to u.s . state tax credits , of which $ 3.6 million are state tax credits acquired from aati in fiscal year 2012 , and $ 13.4 million related to foreign deferred tax assets . if these benefits are recognized in a future period the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets will be reversed and up to a $ 46.6 million income tax benefit , and up to a $ 0.4 million reduction to goodwill may be recognized . the company will need to generate $ 209.0 million of future united states federal taxable income to utilize our united states deferred tax assets as of september 28 , 2012 . deferred tax assets are recognized for foreign operations when management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be recovered during the carry forward period . the company will continue to assess its valuation allowance in future periods . as of september 28 , 2012 , the company has united states federal net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $ 74.3 million , including $ 29.5 million related to the acquisition of sige , which will expire at various dates through 2030 and $ 28.1 million related to the acquisition of aati , which will expire at various dates through 2031 . the utilization of these net operating losses is subject to certain annual limitations as required under internal revenue code section 382 and similar state income tax provisions . the company also has united states federal income tax credit carry forwards of $ 37.8 million , of which $ 30.4 million of federal income tax credit carry forwards have not been recorded as a deferred tax asset . the company also has state income tax credit carry forwards of $ 33.6 million , for which the company has provided a valuation allowance . the united states federal tax credits expire at various dates through 2032 . the state tax credits relate primarily to california research tax credits which can be carried forward indefinitely . the company has continued to expand its operations and increase its investments in numerous international jurisdictions . these activities will increase the company 2019s earnings attributable to foreign jurisdictions . as of september 28 , 2012 , no provision has been made for united states federal , state , or additional foreign income taxes related to approximately $ 371.5 million of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries which have been or are intended to be permanently reinvested . it is not practicable to determine the united states federal income tax liability , if any , which would be payable if such earnings were not permanently reinvested . the company 2019s gross unrecognized tax benefits totaled $ 52.4 million and $ 32.1 million as of september 28 , 2012 and september 30 , 2011 , respectively . of the total unrecognized tax benefits at september 28 , 2012 , $ 38.8 million would impact the effective tax rate , if recognized . the remaining unrecognized tax benefits would not impact the effective tax rate , if recognized , due to the company 2019s valuation allowance and certain positions which were required to be capitalized . there are no positions which the company anticipates could change within the next twelve months . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : unrecognized tax benefits . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at september 30 2011</td><td>$ 32136</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases based on positions related to prior years</td><td>9004</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>increases based on positions related to current year</td><td>11265</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases relating to lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at september 28 2012</td><td>$ 52380</td></tr></table> page 114 annual report .
Question: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits as of september 28, 2012?
Answer: 52380.0
Question: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits as of september 30, 2011?
Answer: 32136.0
Question: what was the change in value?
Answer: 20244.0
Question: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits as of september 30, 2011?
| 32136.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
skyworks solutions , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) maintained a valuation allowance of $ 47.0 million . this valuation allowance is comprised of $ 33.6 million related to u.s . state tax credits , of which $ 3.6 million are state tax credits acquired from aati in fiscal year 2012 , and $ 13.4 million related to foreign deferred tax assets . if these benefits are recognized in a future period the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets will be reversed and up to a $ 46.6 million income tax benefit , and up to a $ 0.4 million reduction to goodwill may be recognized . the company will need to generate $ 209.0 million of future united states federal taxable income to utilize our united states deferred tax assets as of september 28 , 2012 . deferred tax assets are recognized for foreign operations when management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be recovered during the carry forward period . the company will continue to assess its valuation allowance in future periods . as of september 28 , 2012 , the company has united states federal net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $ 74.3 million , including $ 29.5 million related to the acquisition of sige , which will expire at various dates through 2030 and $ 28.1 million related to the acquisition of aati , which will expire at various dates through 2031 . the utilization of these net operating losses is subject to certain annual limitations as required under internal revenue code section 382 and similar state income tax provisions . the company also has united states federal income tax credit carry forwards of $ 37.8 million , of which $ 30.4 million of federal income tax credit carry forwards have not been recorded as a deferred tax asset . the company also has state income tax credit carry forwards of $ 33.6 million , for which the company has provided a valuation allowance . the united states federal tax credits expire at various dates through 2032 . the state tax credits relate primarily to california research tax credits which can be carried forward indefinitely . the company has continued to expand its operations and increase its investments in numerous international jurisdictions . these activities will increase the company 2019s earnings attributable to foreign jurisdictions . as of september 28 , 2012 , no provision has been made for united states federal , state , or additional foreign income taxes related to approximately $ 371.5 million of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries which have been or are intended to be permanently reinvested . it is not practicable to determine the united states federal income tax liability , if any , which would be payable if such earnings were not permanently reinvested . the company 2019s gross unrecognized tax benefits totaled $ 52.4 million and $ 32.1 million as of september 28 , 2012 and september 30 , 2011 , respectively . of the total unrecognized tax benefits at september 28 , 2012 , $ 38.8 million would impact the effective tax rate , if recognized . the remaining unrecognized tax benefits would not impact the effective tax rate , if recognized , due to the company 2019s valuation allowance and certain positions which were required to be capitalized . there are no positions which the company anticipates could change within the next twelve months . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in thousands ) : unrecognized tax benefits . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>unrecognized tax benefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at september 30 2011</td><td>$ 32136</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increases based on positions related to prior years</td><td>9004</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>increases based on positions related to current year</td><td>11265</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>decreases relating to lapses of applicable statutes of limitations</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at september 28 2012</td><td>$ 52380</td></tr></table> page 114 annual report .
Question: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits as of september 28, 2012?
Answer: 52380.0
Question: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits as of september 30, 2011?
Answer: 32136.0
Question: what was the change in value?
Answer: 20244.0
Question: what was the value of unrecognized tax benefits as of september 30, 2011?
Answer: 32136.0
Question: what was the percent change?
| 0.62995 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
management 2019s discussion and analysis 130 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report wholesale credit portfolio the wholesale credit environment remained favorable throughout 2013 driving an increase in commercial client activity . discipline in underwriting across all areas of lending continues to remain a key point of focus , consistent with evolving market conditions and the firm 2019s risk management activities . the wholesale portfolio is actively managed , in part by conducting ongoing , in-depth reviews of credit quality and of industry , product and client concentrations . during the year , wholesale criticized assets and nonperforming assets decreased from higher levels experienced in 2012 , including a reduction in nonaccrual loans by 39% ( 39 % ) . as of december 31 , 2013 , wholesale exposure ( primarily cib , cb and am ) increased by $ 13.7 billion from december 31 , 2012 , primarily driven by increases of $ 11.4 billion in lending-related commitments and $ 8.4 billion in loans reflecting increased client activity primarily in cb and am . these increases were partially offset by a $ 9.2 billion decrease in derivative receivables . derivative receivables decreased predominantly due to reductions in interest rate derivatives driven by an increase in interest rates and reductions in commodity derivatives due to market movements . the decreases were partially offset by an increase in equity derivatives driven by a rise in equity markets . wholesale credit portfolio december 31 , credit exposure nonperforming ( d ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 , ( in millions )</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loans retained</td><td>$ 308263</td><td>$ 306222</td><td>$ 821</td><td>$ 1434</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans held-for-sale</td><td>11290</td><td>4406</td><td>26</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loans at fair value ( a )</td><td>2011</td><td>2555</td><td>197</td><td>265</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loans 2013 reported</td><td>321564</td><td>313183</td><td>1044</td><td>1717</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>derivative receivables</td><td>65759</td><td>74983</td><td>415</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>receivables from customers and other ( b )</td><td>26744</td><td>23648</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total wholesale credit-related assets</td><td>414067</td><td>411814</td><td>1459</td><td>1956</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>lending-related commitments</td><td>446232</td><td>434814</td><td>206</td><td>355</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total wholesale credit exposure</td><td>$ 860299</td><td>$ 846628</td><td>$ 1665</td><td>$ 2311</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>credit portfolio management derivatives notional net ( c )</td><td>$ -27996 ( 27996 )</td><td>$ -27447 ( 27447 )</td><td>$ -5 ( 5 )</td><td>$ -25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives</td><td>-14435 ( 14435 )</td><td>-15201 ( 15201 )</td><td>na</td><td>na</td></tr></table> receivables from customers and other ( b ) 26744 23648 2014 2014 total wholesale credit- related assets 414067 411814 1459 1956 lending-related commitments 446232 434814 206 355 total wholesale credit exposure $ 860299 $ 846628 $ 1665 $ 2311 credit portfolio management derivatives notional , net ( c ) $ ( 27996 ) $ ( 27447 ) $ ( 5 ) $ ( 25 ) liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives ( 14435 ) ( 15201 ) na na ( a ) during 2013 , certain loans that resulted from restructurings that were previously classified as performing were reclassified as nonperforming loans . prior periods were revised to conform with the current presentation . ( b ) receivables from customers and other primarily includes margin loans to prime and retail brokerage customers ; these are classified in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheets . ( c ) represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives used to manage both performing and nonperforming wholesale credit exposures ; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under u.s . gaap . excludes the synthetic credit portfolio . for additional information , see credit derivatives on pages 137 2013138 , and note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . ( d ) excludes assets acquired in loan satisfactions. .
Question: what is the net value change in loans reported from 2012 to 2013?
| 8381.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
management 2019s discussion and analysis 130 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report wholesale credit portfolio the wholesale credit environment remained favorable throughout 2013 driving an increase in commercial client activity . discipline in underwriting across all areas of lending continues to remain a key point of focus , consistent with evolving market conditions and the firm 2019s risk management activities . the wholesale portfolio is actively managed , in part by conducting ongoing , in-depth reviews of credit quality and of industry , product and client concentrations . during the year , wholesale criticized assets and nonperforming assets decreased from higher levels experienced in 2012 , including a reduction in nonaccrual loans by 39% ( 39 % ) . as of december 31 , 2013 , wholesale exposure ( primarily cib , cb and am ) increased by $ 13.7 billion from december 31 , 2012 , primarily driven by increases of $ 11.4 billion in lending-related commitments and $ 8.4 billion in loans reflecting increased client activity primarily in cb and am . these increases were partially offset by a $ 9.2 billion decrease in derivative receivables . derivative receivables decreased predominantly due to reductions in interest rate derivatives driven by an increase in interest rates and reductions in commodity derivatives due to market movements . the decreases were partially offset by an increase in equity derivatives driven by a rise in equity markets . wholesale credit portfolio december 31 , credit exposure nonperforming ( d ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 , ( in millions )</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td><td>december 31 , 2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>loans retained</td><td>$ 308263</td><td>$ 306222</td><td>$ 821</td><td>$ 1434</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans held-for-sale</td><td>11290</td><td>4406</td><td>26</td><td>18</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loans at fair value ( a )</td><td>2011</td><td>2555</td><td>197</td><td>265</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loans 2013 reported</td><td>321564</td><td>313183</td><td>1044</td><td>1717</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>derivative receivables</td><td>65759</td><td>74983</td><td>415</td><td>239</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>receivables from customers and other ( b )</td><td>26744</td><td>23648</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total wholesale credit-related assets</td><td>414067</td><td>411814</td><td>1459</td><td>1956</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>lending-related commitments</td><td>446232</td><td>434814</td><td>206</td><td>355</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total wholesale credit exposure</td><td>$ 860299</td><td>$ 846628</td><td>$ 1665</td><td>$ 2311</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>credit portfolio management derivatives notional net ( c )</td><td>$ -27996 ( 27996 )</td><td>$ -27447 ( 27447 )</td><td>$ -5 ( 5 )</td><td>$ -25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives</td><td>-14435 ( 14435 )</td><td>-15201 ( 15201 )</td><td>na</td><td>na</td></tr></table> receivables from customers and other ( b ) 26744 23648 2014 2014 total wholesale credit- related assets 414067 411814 1459 1956 lending-related commitments 446232 434814 206 355 total wholesale credit exposure $ 860299 $ 846628 $ 1665 $ 2311 credit portfolio management derivatives notional , net ( c ) $ ( 27996 ) $ ( 27447 ) $ ( 5 ) $ ( 25 ) liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives ( 14435 ) ( 15201 ) na na ( a ) during 2013 , certain loans that resulted from restructurings that were previously classified as performing were reclassified as nonperforming loans . prior periods were revised to conform with the current presentation . ( b ) receivables from customers and other primarily includes margin loans to prime and retail brokerage customers ; these are classified in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheets . ( c ) represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives used to manage both performing and nonperforming wholesale credit exposures ; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under u.s . gaap . excludes the synthetic credit portfolio . for additional information , see credit derivatives on pages 137 2013138 , and note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . ( d ) excludes assets acquired in loan satisfactions. .
Question: what is the net value change in loans reported from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 8381.0
Question: what is the percent change from 2012 to 2013?
| 0.02676 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
stock performance graph the following graph compares the most recent five-year performance of alcoa 2019s common stock with ( 1 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae index and ( 2 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae materials index , a group of 27 companies categorized by standard & poor 2019s as active in the 201cmaterials 201d market sector . such information shall not be deemed to be 201cfiled . 201d five-year cumulative total return based upon an initial investment of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 with dividends reinvested alcoa inc . s&p 500 ae index s&p 500 ae materials index dec-'10 dec-'11 dec-'12 dec-'14 dec-'15dec-'13 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>alcoainc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 57</td><td>$ 58</td><td>$ 72</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 aeindex</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>118</td><td>157</td><td>178</td><td>181</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 aematerials index</td><td>100</td><td>90</td><td>104</td><td>130</td><td>139</td><td>128</td></tr></table> s&p 500 ae index 100 102 118 157 178 181 s&p 500 ae materials index 100 90 104 130 139 128 copyright a9 2016 standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . source : research data group , inc . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) .
Question: what was the investment on the alcoainc . in 2014?
| 107.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
stock performance graph the following graph compares the most recent five-year performance of alcoa 2019s common stock with ( 1 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae index and ( 2 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae materials index , a group of 27 companies categorized by standard & poor 2019s as active in the 201cmaterials 201d market sector . such information shall not be deemed to be 201cfiled . 201d five-year cumulative total return based upon an initial investment of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 with dividends reinvested alcoa inc . s&p 500 ae index s&p 500 ae materials index dec-'10 dec-'11 dec-'12 dec-'14 dec-'15dec-'13 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>alcoainc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 57</td><td>$ 58</td><td>$ 72</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 aeindex</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>118</td><td>157</td><td>178</td><td>181</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 aematerials index</td><td>100</td><td>90</td><td>104</td><td>130</td><td>139</td><td>128</td></tr></table> s&p 500 ae index 100 102 118 157 178 181 s&p 500 ae materials index 100 90 104 130 139 128 copyright a9 2016 standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . source : research data group , inc . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) .
Question: what was the investment on the alcoainc . in 2014?
Answer: 107.0
Question: and what was it in 2013?
| 72.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
stock performance graph the following graph compares the most recent five-year performance of alcoa 2019s common stock with ( 1 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae index and ( 2 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae materials index , a group of 27 companies categorized by standard & poor 2019s as active in the 201cmaterials 201d market sector . such information shall not be deemed to be 201cfiled . 201d five-year cumulative total return based upon an initial investment of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 with dividends reinvested alcoa inc . s&p 500 ae index s&p 500 ae materials index dec-'10 dec-'11 dec-'12 dec-'14 dec-'15dec-'13 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>alcoainc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 57</td><td>$ 58</td><td>$ 72</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 aeindex</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>118</td><td>157</td><td>178</td><td>181</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 aematerials index</td><td>100</td><td>90</td><td>104</td><td>130</td><td>139</td><td>128</td></tr></table> s&p 500 ae index 100 102 118 157 178 181 s&p 500 ae materials index 100 90 104 130 139 128 copyright a9 2016 standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . source : research data group , inc . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) .
Question: what was the investment on the alcoainc . in 2014?
Answer: 107.0
Question: and what was it in 2013?
Answer: 72.0
Question: how much, then, does the 2014 investment represent in relation to the 2013 one?
| 1.48611 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
stock performance graph the following graph compares the most recent five-year performance of alcoa 2019s common stock with ( 1 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae index and ( 2 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae materials index , a group of 27 companies categorized by standard & poor 2019s as active in the 201cmaterials 201d market sector . such information shall not be deemed to be 201cfiled . 201d five-year cumulative total return based upon an initial investment of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 with dividends reinvested alcoa inc . s&p 500 ae index s&p 500 ae materials index dec-'10 dec-'11 dec-'12 dec-'14 dec-'15dec-'13 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of december 31,</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>alcoainc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 57</td><td>$ 58</td><td>$ 72</td><td>$ 107</td><td>$ 68</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 aeindex</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>118</td><td>157</td><td>178</td><td>181</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 aematerials index</td><td>100</td><td>90</td><td>104</td><td>130</td><td>139</td><td>128</td></tr></table> s&p 500 ae index 100 102 118 157 178 181 s&p 500 ae materials index 100 90 104 130 139 128 copyright a9 2016 standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . source : research data group , inc . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) .
Question: what was the investment on the alcoainc . in 2014?
Answer: 107.0
Question: and what was it in 2013?
Answer: 72.0
Question: how much, then, does the 2014 investment represent in relation to the 2013 one?
Answer: 1.48611
Question: and what is the difference between this value and the number one?
| 0.48611 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements in connection with the firm 2019s prime brokerage and clearing businesses , the firm agrees to clear and settle on behalf of its clients the transactions entered into by them with other brokerage firms . the firm 2019s obligations in respect of such transactions are secured by the assets in the client 2019s account as well as any proceeds received from the transactions cleared and settled by the firm on behalf of the client . in connection with joint venture investments , the firm may issue loan guarantees under which it may be liable in the event of fraud , misappropriation , environmental liabilities and certain other matters involving the borrower . the firm is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under these guarantees and indemnifications . however , management believes that it is unlikely the firm will have to make any material payments under these arrangements , and no material liabilities related to these guarantees and indemnifications have been recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition as of december 2016 and december 2015 . other representations , warranties and indemnifications . the firm provides representations and warranties to counterparties in connection with a variety of commercial transactions and occasionally indemnifies them against potential losses caused by the breach of those representations and warranties . the firm may also provide indemnifications protecting against changes in or adverse application of certain u.s . tax laws in connection with ordinary-course transactions such as securities issuances , borrowings or derivatives . in addition , the firm may provide indemnifications to some counterparties to protect them in the event additional taxes are owed or payments are withheld , due either to a change in or an adverse application of certain non-u.s . tax laws . these indemnifications generally are standard contractual terms and are entered into in the ordinary course of business . generally , there are no stated or notional amounts included in these indemnifications , and the contingencies triggering the obligation to indemnify are not expected to occur . the firm is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under these guarantees and indemnifications . however , management believes that it is unlikely the firm will have to make any material payments under these arrangements , and no material liabilities related to these arrangements have been recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition as of december 2016 and december 2015 . guarantees of subsidiaries . group inc . fully and unconditionally guarantees the securities issued by gs finance corp. , a wholly-owned finance subsidiary of the group inc . has guaranteed the payment obligations of goldman , sachs & co . ( gs&co. ) and gs bank usa , subject to certain exceptions . in addition , group inc . guarantees many of the obligations of its other consolidated subsidiaries on a transaction-by- transaction basis , as negotiated with counterparties . group inc . is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under its subsidiary guarantees ; however , because these guaranteed obligations are also obligations of consolidated subsidiaries , group inc . 2019s liabilities as guarantor are not separately disclosed . note 19 . shareholders 2019 equity common equity dividends declared per common share were $ 2.60 in 2016 , $ 2.55 in 2015 and $ 2.25 in 2014 . on january 17 , 2017 , group inc . declared a dividend of $ 0.65 per common share to be paid on march 30 , 2017 to common shareholders of record on march 2 , 2017 . the firm 2019s share repurchase program is intended to help maintain the appropriate level of common equity . the share repurchase program is effected primarily through regular open-market purchases ( which may include repurchase plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 ) , the amounts and timing of which are determined primarily by the firm 2019s current and projected capital position , but which may also be influenced by general market conditions and the prevailing price and trading volumes of the firm 2019s common stock . prior to repurchasing common stock , the firm must receive confirmation that the federal reserve board does not object to such capital actions . the table below presents the amount of common stock repurchased by the firm under the share repurchase program. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions except per share amounts</td><td>year ended december 2016</td><td>year ended december 2015</td><td>year ended december 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common share repurchases</td><td>36.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>31.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average cost per share</td><td>$ 165.88</td><td>$ 189.41</td><td>$ 171.79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total cost of common share repurchases</td><td>$ 6069</td><td>$ 4195</td><td>$ 5469</td></tr></table> 172 goldman sachs 2016 form 10-k .
Question: what is the common equity dividends declared per common share in 2016?
| 2.6 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements in connection with the firm 2019s prime brokerage and clearing businesses , the firm agrees to clear and settle on behalf of its clients the transactions entered into by them with other brokerage firms . the firm 2019s obligations in respect of such transactions are secured by the assets in the client 2019s account as well as any proceeds received from the transactions cleared and settled by the firm on behalf of the client . in connection with joint venture investments , the firm may issue loan guarantees under which it may be liable in the event of fraud , misappropriation , environmental liabilities and certain other matters involving the borrower . the firm is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under these guarantees and indemnifications . however , management believes that it is unlikely the firm will have to make any material payments under these arrangements , and no material liabilities related to these guarantees and indemnifications have been recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition as of december 2016 and december 2015 . other representations , warranties and indemnifications . the firm provides representations and warranties to counterparties in connection with a variety of commercial transactions and occasionally indemnifies them against potential losses caused by the breach of those representations and warranties . the firm may also provide indemnifications protecting against changes in or adverse application of certain u.s . tax laws in connection with ordinary-course transactions such as securities issuances , borrowings or derivatives . in addition , the firm may provide indemnifications to some counterparties to protect them in the event additional taxes are owed or payments are withheld , due either to a change in or an adverse application of certain non-u.s . tax laws . these indemnifications generally are standard contractual terms and are entered into in the ordinary course of business . generally , there are no stated or notional amounts included in these indemnifications , and the contingencies triggering the obligation to indemnify are not expected to occur . the firm is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under these guarantees and indemnifications . however , management believes that it is unlikely the firm will have to make any material payments under these arrangements , and no material liabilities related to these arrangements have been recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition as of december 2016 and december 2015 . guarantees of subsidiaries . group inc . fully and unconditionally guarantees the securities issued by gs finance corp. , a wholly-owned finance subsidiary of the group inc . has guaranteed the payment obligations of goldman , sachs & co . ( gs&co. ) and gs bank usa , subject to certain exceptions . in addition , group inc . guarantees many of the obligations of its other consolidated subsidiaries on a transaction-by- transaction basis , as negotiated with counterparties . group inc . is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under its subsidiary guarantees ; however , because these guaranteed obligations are also obligations of consolidated subsidiaries , group inc . 2019s liabilities as guarantor are not separately disclosed . note 19 . shareholders 2019 equity common equity dividends declared per common share were $ 2.60 in 2016 , $ 2.55 in 2015 and $ 2.25 in 2014 . on january 17 , 2017 , group inc . declared a dividend of $ 0.65 per common share to be paid on march 30 , 2017 to common shareholders of record on march 2 , 2017 . the firm 2019s share repurchase program is intended to help maintain the appropriate level of common equity . the share repurchase program is effected primarily through regular open-market purchases ( which may include repurchase plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 ) , the amounts and timing of which are determined primarily by the firm 2019s current and projected capital position , but which may also be influenced by general market conditions and the prevailing price and trading volumes of the firm 2019s common stock . prior to repurchasing common stock , the firm must receive confirmation that the federal reserve board does not object to such capital actions . the table below presents the amount of common stock repurchased by the firm under the share repurchase program. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions except per share amounts</td><td>year ended december 2016</td><td>year ended december 2015</td><td>year ended december 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common share repurchases</td><td>36.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>31.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average cost per share</td><td>$ 165.88</td><td>$ 189.41</td><td>$ 171.79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total cost of common share repurchases</td><td>$ 6069</td><td>$ 4195</td><td>$ 5469</td></tr></table> 172 goldman sachs 2016 form 10-k .
Question: what is the common equity dividends declared per common share in 2016?
Answer: 2.6
Question: what about in 2015?
| 2.55 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements in connection with the firm 2019s prime brokerage and clearing businesses , the firm agrees to clear and settle on behalf of its clients the transactions entered into by them with other brokerage firms . the firm 2019s obligations in respect of such transactions are secured by the assets in the client 2019s account as well as any proceeds received from the transactions cleared and settled by the firm on behalf of the client . in connection with joint venture investments , the firm may issue loan guarantees under which it may be liable in the event of fraud , misappropriation , environmental liabilities and certain other matters involving the borrower . the firm is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under these guarantees and indemnifications . however , management believes that it is unlikely the firm will have to make any material payments under these arrangements , and no material liabilities related to these guarantees and indemnifications have been recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition as of december 2016 and december 2015 . other representations , warranties and indemnifications . the firm provides representations and warranties to counterparties in connection with a variety of commercial transactions and occasionally indemnifies them against potential losses caused by the breach of those representations and warranties . the firm may also provide indemnifications protecting against changes in or adverse application of certain u.s . tax laws in connection with ordinary-course transactions such as securities issuances , borrowings or derivatives . in addition , the firm may provide indemnifications to some counterparties to protect them in the event additional taxes are owed or payments are withheld , due either to a change in or an adverse application of certain non-u.s . tax laws . these indemnifications generally are standard contractual terms and are entered into in the ordinary course of business . generally , there are no stated or notional amounts included in these indemnifications , and the contingencies triggering the obligation to indemnify are not expected to occur . the firm is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under these guarantees and indemnifications . however , management believes that it is unlikely the firm will have to make any material payments under these arrangements , and no material liabilities related to these arrangements have been recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition as of december 2016 and december 2015 . guarantees of subsidiaries . group inc . fully and unconditionally guarantees the securities issued by gs finance corp. , a wholly-owned finance subsidiary of the group inc . has guaranteed the payment obligations of goldman , sachs & co . ( gs&co. ) and gs bank usa , subject to certain exceptions . in addition , group inc . guarantees many of the obligations of its other consolidated subsidiaries on a transaction-by- transaction basis , as negotiated with counterparties . group inc . is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under its subsidiary guarantees ; however , because these guaranteed obligations are also obligations of consolidated subsidiaries , group inc . 2019s liabilities as guarantor are not separately disclosed . note 19 . shareholders 2019 equity common equity dividends declared per common share were $ 2.60 in 2016 , $ 2.55 in 2015 and $ 2.25 in 2014 . on january 17 , 2017 , group inc . declared a dividend of $ 0.65 per common share to be paid on march 30 , 2017 to common shareholders of record on march 2 , 2017 . the firm 2019s share repurchase program is intended to help maintain the appropriate level of common equity . the share repurchase program is effected primarily through regular open-market purchases ( which may include repurchase plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 ) , the amounts and timing of which are determined primarily by the firm 2019s current and projected capital position , but which may also be influenced by general market conditions and the prevailing price and trading volumes of the firm 2019s common stock . prior to repurchasing common stock , the firm must receive confirmation that the federal reserve board does not object to such capital actions . the table below presents the amount of common stock repurchased by the firm under the share repurchase program. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions except per share amounts</td><td>year ended december 2016</td><td>year ended december 2015</td><td>year ended december 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common share repurchases</td><td>36.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>31.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average cost per share</td><td>$ 165.88</td><td>$ 189.41</td><td>$ 171.79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total cost of common share repurchases</td><td>$ 6069</td><td>$ 4195</td><td>$ 5469</td></tr></table> 172 goldman sachs 2016 form 10-k .
Question: what is the common equity dividends declared per common share in 2016?
Answer: 2.6
Question: what about in 2015?
Answer: 2.55
Question: what is the total dividends declared in these two years?
| 5.15 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements in connection with the firm 2019s prime brokerage and clearing businesses , the firm agrees to clear and settle on behalf of its clients the transactions entered into by them with other brokerage firms . the firm 2019s obligations in respect of such transactions are secured by the assets in the client 2019s account as well as any proceeds received from the transactions cleared and settled by the firm on behalf of the client . in connection with joint venture investments , the firm may issue loan guarantees under which it may be liable in the event of fraud , misappropriation , environmental liabilities and certain other matters involving the borrower . the firm is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under these guarantees and indemnifications . however , management believes that it is unlikely the firm will have to make any material payments under these arrangements , and no material liabilities related to these guarantees and indemnifications have been recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition as of december 2016 and december 2015 . other representations , warranties and indemnifications . the firm provides representations and warranties to counterparties in connection with a variety of commercial transactions and occasionally indemnifies them against potential losses caused by the breach of those representations and warranties . the firm may also provide indemnifications protecting against changes in or adverse application of certain u.s . tax laws in connection with ordinary-course transactions such as securities issuances , borrowings or derivatives . in addition , the firm may provide indemnifications to some counterparties to protect them in the event additional taxes are owed or payments are withheld , due either to a change in or an adverse application of certain non-u.s . tax laws . these indemnifications generally are standard contractual terms and are entered into in the ordinary course of business . generally , there are no stated or notional amounts included in these indemnifications , and the contingencies triggering the obligation to indemnify are not expected to occur . the firm is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under these guarantees and indemnifications . however , management believes that it is unlikely the firm will have to make any material payments under these arrangements , and no material liabilities related to these arrangements have been recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition as of december 2016 and december 2015 . guarantees of subsidiaries . group inc . fully and unconditionally guarantees the securities issued by gs finance corp. , a wholly-owned finance subsidiary of the group inc . has guaranteed the payment obligations of goldman , sachs & co . ( gs&co. ) and gs bank usa , subject to certain exceptions . in addition , group inc . guarantees many of the obligations of its other consolidated subsidiaries on a transaction-by- transaction basis , as negotiated with counterparties . group inc . is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum payout under its subsidiary guarantees ; however , because these guaranteed obligations are also obligations of consolidated subsidiaries , group inc . 2019s liabilities as guarantor are not separately disclosed . note 19 . shareholders 2019 equity common equity dividends declared per common share were $ 2.60 in 2016 , $ 2.55 in 2015 and $ 2.25 in 2014 . on january 17 , 2017 , group inc . declared a dividend of $ 0.65 per common share to be paid on march 30 , 2017 to common shareholders of record on march 2 , 2017 . the firm 2019s share repurchase program is intended to help maintain the appropriate level of common equity . the share repurchase program is effected primarily through regular open-market purchases ( which may include repurchase plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 ) , the amounts and timing of which are determined primarily by the firm 2019s current and projected capital position , but which may also be influenced by general market conditions and the prevailing price and trading volumes of the firm 2019s common stock . prior to repurchasing common stock , the firm must receive confirmation that the federal reserve board does not object to such capital actions . the table below presents the amount of common stock repurchased by the firm under the share repurchase program. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions except per share amounts</td><td>year ended december 2016</td><td>year ended december 2015</td><td>year ended december 2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>common share repurchases</td><td>36.6</td><td>22.1</td><td>31.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average cost per share</td><td>$ 165.88</td><td>$ 189.41</td><td>$ 171.79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total cost of common share repurchases</td><td>$ 6069</td><td>$ 4195</td><td>$ 5469</td></tr></table> 172 goldman sachs 2016 form 10-k .
Question: what is the common equity dividends declared per common share in 2016?
Answer: 2.6
Question: what about in 2015?
Answer: 2.55
Question: what is the total dividends declared in these two years?
Answer: 5.15
Question: what about the total dividends declared from 2014 to 2016?
| 7.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the following is a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the year : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>unrecognized tax benefit 2014january 1 2008</td><td>$ 7928</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ansoft unrecognized tax benefit 2014acquired july 31 2008</td><td>3525</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases 2014tax positions in prior period</td><td>2454</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross decreases 2014tax positions in prior period</td><td>-1572 ( 1572 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross increases 2014tax positions in current period</td><td>2255</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions due to a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-1598 ( 1598 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>changes due to currency fluctuation</td><td>-259 ( 259 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>-317 ( 317 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>unrecognized tax benefit 2014december 31 2008</td><td>$ 12416</td></tr></table> included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2008 are $ 5.6 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate . also included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2008 are $ 5.0 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would result in a decrease to goodwill recorded in purchase business combinations , and $ 1.9 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would result in adjustments to other tax accounts , primarily deferred taxes . the company believes it is reasonably possible that uncertain tax positions of approximately $ 2.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 will be resolved within the next twelve months . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense . related to the uncertain tax benefits noted above , the company recorded interest of $ 171000 during 2008 . penalties recorded during 2008 were insignificant . in total , as of december 31 , 2008 , the company has recognized a liability for penalties of $ 498000 and interest of $ 1.8 million . the company is subject to taxation in the u.s . and various states and foreign jurisdictions . the company 2019s 2005 through 2008 tax years are open to examination by the internal revenue service . the 2005 and 2006 federal returns are currently under examination . the company also has various foreign subsidiaries with tax filings under examination , as well as numerous foreign and state tax filings subject to examination for various years . 10 . pension and profit-sharing plans the company has 401 ( k ) /profit-sharing plans for all qualifying full-time domestic employees that permit participants to make contributions by salary reduction pursuant to section 401 ( k ) of the internal revenue code . the company makes matching contributions on behalf of each eligible participant in an amount equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the first 3% ( 3 % ) and an additional 25% ( 25 % ) of the next 5% ( 5 % ) , for a maximum total of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) of the employee 2019s compensation . the company may make a discretionary profit sharing contribution in the amount of 0% ( 0 % ) to 5% ( 5 % ) based on the participant 2019s eligible compensation , provided the employee is employed at the end of the year and has worked at least 1000 hours . the qualifying domestic employees of the company 2019s ansoft subsidiary , acquired on july 31 , 2008 , also participate in a 401 ( k ) plan . there is no matching employer contribution associated with this plan . the company also maintains various defined contribution pension arrangements for its international employees . expenses related to the company 2019s retirement programs were $ 3.7 million in 2008 , $ 4.7 million in 2007 and $ 4.1 million in 2006 . 11 . non-compete and employment agreements employees of the company have signed agreements under which they have agreed not to disclose trade secrets or confidential information and , where legally permitted , that restrict engagement in or connection with any business that is competitive with the company anywhere in the world while employed by the company ( and .
Question: what was the value in unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2008?
| 12416.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the following is a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the year : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>unrecognized tax benefit 2014january 1 2008</td><td>$ 7928</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ansoft unrecognized tax benefit 2014acquired july 31 2008</td><td>3525</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases 2014tax positions in prior period</td><td>2454</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross decreases 2014tax positions in prior period</td><td>-1572 ( 1572 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross increases 2014tax positions in current period</td><td>2255</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions due to a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-1598 ( 1598 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>changes due to currency fluctuation</td><td>-259 ( 259 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>-317 ( 317 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>unrecognized tax benefit 2014december 31 2008</td><td>$ 12416</td></tr></table> included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2008 are $ 5.6 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate . also included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2008 are $ 5.0 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would result in a decrease to goodwill recorded in purchase business combinations , and $ 1.9 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would result in adjustments to other tax accounts , primarily deferred taxes . the company believes it is reasonably possible that uncertain tax positions of approximately $ 2.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 will be resolved within the next twelve months . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense . related to the uncertain tax benefits noted above , the company recorded interest of $ 171000 during 2008 . penalties recorded during 2008 were insignificant . in total , as of december 31 , 2008 , the company has recognized a liability for penalties of $ 498000 and interest of $ 1.8 million . the company is subject to taxation in the u.s . and various states and foreign jurisdictions . the company 2019s 2005 through 2008 tax years are open to examination by the internal revenue service . the 2005 and 2006 federal returns are currently under examination . the company also has various foreign subsidiaries with tax filings under examination , as well as numerous foreign and state tax filings subject to examination for various years . 10 . pension and profit-sharing plans the company has 401 ( k ) /profit-sharing plans for all qualifying full-time domestic employees that permit participants to make contributions by salary reduction pursuant to section 401 ( k ) of the internal revenue code . the company makes matching contributions on behalf of each eligible participant in an amount equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the first 3% ( 3 % ) and an additional 25% ( 25 % ) of the next 5% ( 5 % ) , for a maximum total of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) of the employee 2019s compensation . the company may make a discretionary profit sharing contribution in the amount of 0% ( 0 % ) to 5% ( 5 % ) based on the participant 2019s eligible compensation , provided the employee is employed at the end of the year and has worked at least 1000 hours . the qualifying domestic employees of the company 2019s ansoft subsidiary , acquired on july 31 , 2008 , also participate in a 401 ( k ) plan . there is no matching employer contribution associated with this plan . the company also maintains various defined contribution pension arrangements for its international employees . expenses related to the company 2019s retirement programs were $ 3.7 million in 2008 , $ 4.7 million in 2007 and $ 4.1 million in 2006 . 11 . non-compete and employment agreements employees of the company have signed agreements under which they have agreed not to disclose trade secrets or confidential information and , where legally permitted , that restrict engagement in or connection with any business that is competitive with the company anywhere in the world while employed by the company ( and .
Question: what was the value in unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2008?
Answer: 12416.0
Question: what was the value in unrecognized tax benefits at the start of 2008?
| 7928.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the following is a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the year : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>unrecognized tax benefit 2014january 1 2008</td><td>$ 7928</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ansoft unrecognized tax benefit 2014acquired july 31 2008</td><td>3525</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases 2014tax positions in prior period</td><td>2454</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross decreases 2014tax positions in prior period</td><td>-1572 ( 1572 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross increases 2014tax positions in current period</td><td>2255</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions due to a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-1598 ( 1598 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>changes due to currency fluctuation</td><td>-259 ( 259 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>-317 ( 317 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>unrecognized tax benefit 2014december 31 2008</td><td>$ 12416</td></tr></table> included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2008 are $ 5.6 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate . also included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2008 are $ 5.0 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would result in a decrease to goodwill recorded in purchase business combinations , and $ 1.9 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would result in adjustments to other tax accounts , primarily deferred taxes . the company believes it is reasonably possible that uncertain tax positions of approximately $ 2.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 will be resolved within the next twelve months . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense . related to the uncertain tax benefits noted above , the company recorded interest of $ 171000 during 2008 . penalties recorded during 2008 were insignificant . in total , as of december 31 , 2008 , the company has recognized a liability for penalties of $ 498000 and interest of $ 1.8 million . the company is subject to taxation in the u.s . and various states and foreign jurisdictions . the company 2019s 2005 through 2008 tax years are open to examination by the internal revenue service . the 2005 and 2006 federal returns are currently under examination . the company also has various foreign subsidiaries with tax filings under examination , as well as numerous foreign and state tax filings subject to examination for various years . 10 . pension and profit-sharing plans the company has 401 ( k ) /profit-sharing plans for all qualifying full-time domestic employees that permit participants to make contributions by salary reduction pursuant to section 401 ( k ) of the internal revenue code . the company makes matching contributions on behalf of each eligible participant in an amount equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the first 3% ( 3 % ) and an additional 25% ( 25 % ) of the next 5% ( 5 % ) , for a maximum total of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) of the employee 2019s compensation . the company may make a discretionary profit sharing contribution in the amount of 0% ( 0 % ) to 5% ( 5 % ) based on the participant 2019s eligible compensation , provided the employee is employed at the end of the year and has worked at least 1000 hours . the qualifying domestic employees of the company 2019s ansoft subsidiary , acquired on july 31 , 2008 , also participate in a 401 ( k ) plan . there is no matching employer contribution associated with this plan . the company also maintains various defined contribution pension arrangements for its international employees . expenses related to the company 2019s retirement programs were $ 3.7 million in 2008 , $ 4.7 million in 2007 and $ 4.1 million in 2006 . 11 . non-compete and employment agreements employees of the company have signed agreements under which they have agreed not to disclose trade secrets or confidential information and , where legally permitted , that restrict engagement in or connection with any business that is competitive with the company anywhere in the world while employed by the company ( and .
Question: what was the value in unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2008?
Answer: 12416.0
Question: what was the value in unrecognized tax benefits at the start of 2008?
Answer: 7928.0
Question: what is the difference in values?
| 4488.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the following is a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits for the year : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>unrecognized tax benefit 2014january 1 2008</td><td>$ 7928</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ansoft unrecognized tax benefit 2014acquired july 31 2008</td><td>3525</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases 2014tax positions in prior period</td><td>2454</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross decreases 2014tax positions in prior period</td><td>-1572 ( 1572 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross increases 2014tax positions in current period</td><td>2255</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions due to a lapse of the applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-1598 ( 1598 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>changes due to currency fluctuation</td><td>-259 ( 259 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>-317 ( 317 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>unrecognized tax benefit 2014december 31 2008</td><td>$ 12416</td></tr></table> included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2008 are $ 5.6 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate . also included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits at december 31 , 2008 are $ 5.0 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would result in a decrease to goodwill recorded in purchase business combinations , and $ 1.9 million of tax benefits that , if recognized , would result in adjustments to other tax accounts , primarily deferred taxes . the company believes it is reasonably possible that uncertain tax positions of approximately $ 2.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 will be resolved within the next twelve months . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense . related to the uncertain tax benefits noted above , the company recorded interest of $ 171000 during 2008 . penalties recorded during 2008 were insignificant . in total , as of december 31 , 2008 , the company has recognized a liability for penalties of $ 498000 and interest of $ 1.8 million . the company is subject to taxation in the u.s . and various states and foreign jurisdictions . the company 2019s 2005 through 2008 tax years are open to examination by the internal revenue service . the 2005 and 2006 federal returns are currently under examination . the company also has various foreign subsidiaries with tax filings under examination , as well as numerous foreign and state tax filings subject to examination for various years . 10 . pension and profit-sharing plans the company has 401 ( k ) /profit-sharing plans for all qualifying full-time domestic employees that permit participants to make contributions by salary reduction pursuant to section 401 ( k ) of the internal revenue code . the company makes matching contributions on behalf of each eligible participant in an amount equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the first 3% ( 3 % ) and an additional 25% ( 25 % ) of the next 5% ( 5 % ) , for a maximum total of 4.25% ( 4.25 % ) of the employee 2019s compensation . the company may make a discretionary profit sharing contribution in the amount of 0% ( 0 % ) to 5% ( 5 % ) based on the participant 2019s eligible compensation , provided the employee is employed at the end of the year and has worked at least 1000 hours . the qualifying domestic employees of the company 2019s ansoft subsidiary , acquired on july 31 , 2008 , also participate in a 401 ( k ) plan . there is no matching employer contribution associated with this plan . the company also maintains various defined contribution pension arrangements for its international employees . expenses related to the company 2019s retirement programs were $ 3.7 million in 2008 , $ 4.7 million in 2007 and $ 4.1 million in 2006 . 11 . non-compete and employment agreements employees of the company have signed agreements under which they have agreed not to disclose trade secrets or confidential information and , where legally permitted , that restrict engagement in or connection with any business that is competitive with the company anywhere in the world while employed by the company ( and .
Question: what was the value in unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2008?
Answer: 12416.0
Question: what was the value in unrecognized tax benefits at the start of 2008?
Answer: 7928.0
Question: what is the difference in values?
Answer: 4488.0
Question: what is the percent change during the year?
| 0.56609 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
under the terms of the ansys , inc . long-term incentive plan , in the first quarter of 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , the company granted 100000 , 92500 and 80500 performance-based restricted stock units , respectively . vesting of the full award or a portion thereof is based on the company 2019s performance as measured by total shareholder return relative to the median percentage appreciation of the nasdaq composite index over a specified measurement period , subject to each participant 2019s continued employment with the company through the conclusion of the measurement period . the measurement period for the restricted stock units granted pursuant to the long-term incentive plan is a three-year period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant . each restricted stock unit relates to one share of the company 2019s common stock . the value of each restricted stock unit granted in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was estimated on the grant date to be $ 33.16 , $ 32.05 and $ 25.00 , respectively . the estimate of the grant-date value of the restricted stock units was made using a monte carlo simulation model . the determination of the fair value of the awards was affected by the grant date and a number of variables , each of which has been identified in the chart below . share-based compensation expense based on the fair value of the award is being recorded from the grant date through the conclusion of the three-year measurement period . on december 31 , 2012 , employees earned 76500 restricted stock units , which will be issued in the first quarter of 2013 . total compensation expense associated with the awards recorded for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 2.6 million , $ 1.6 million and $ 590000 , respectively . total compensation expense associated with the awards granted for the years ending december 31 , 2013 and 2014 is expected to be $ 2.2 million and $ 1.2 million , respectively. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>assumption used in monte carlo lattice pricing model</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2011 and 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.16% ( 0.16 % )</td><td>1.35% ( 1.35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>0% ( 0 % )</td><td>0% ( 0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility 2014ansys stock price</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td><td>40% ( 40 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected volatility 2014nasdaq composite index</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>expected term</td><td>2.80</td><td>2.90</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>correlation factor</td><td>0.75</td><td>0.70</td></tr></table> in accordance with the merger agreement , the company granted performance-based restricted stock units to key members of apache management and employees , with a maximum value of $ 13.0 million to be earned annually over a three-fiscal-year period beginning january 1 , 2012 . additional details regarding these awards are provided within note 3 . 14 . stock repurchase program in february 2012 , ansys announced that its board of directors approved an increase to its authorized stock repurchase program . under the company 2019s stock repurchase program , ansys repurchased 1.5 million shares during the year ended december 31 , 2012 at an average price per share of $ 63.65 , for a total cost of $ 95.5 million . during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , the company repurchased 247443 shares at an average price per share of $ 51.34 , for a total cost of $ 12.7 million . as of december 31 , 2012 , 1.5 million shares remained authorized for repurchase under the program . 15 . employee stock purchase plan the company 2019s 1996 employee stock purchase plan ( the 201cpurchase plan 201d ) was adopted by the board of directors on april 19 , 1996 and was subsequently approved by the company 2019s stockholders . the stockholders approved an amendment to the purchase plan on may 6 , 2004 to increase the number of shares available for offerings to 1.6 million shares . the purchase plan was amended and restated in 2007 . the purchase plan is administered by the compensation committee . offerings under the purchase plan commence on each february 1 and august 1 , and have a duration of six months . an employee who owns or is deemed to own shares of stock representing in excess of 5% ( 5 % ) of the combined voting power of all classes of stock of the company may not participate in the purchase plan . during each offering , an eligible employee may purchase shares under the purchase plan by authorizing payroll deductions of up to 10% ( 10 % ) of his or her cash compensation during the offering period . the maximum number of shares that may be purchased by any participating employee during any offering period is limited to 3840 shares ( as adjusted by the compensation committee from time to time ) . unless the employee has previously withdrawn from the offering , his accumulated payroll deductions will be used to purchase common stock on the last business day of the period at a price equal to 90% ( 90 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock on the first or last day of the offering period , whichever is lower . under applicable tax rules , an employee may purchase no more than $ 25000 worth of common stock in any calendar year . at december 31 , 2012 , 1233385 shares of common stock had been issued under the purchase plan , of which 1184082 were issued as of december 31 , 2011 . the total compensation expense recorded under the purchase plan during the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 710000 , $ 650000 and $ 500000 , respectively . table of contents .
Question: what is the sum of compensation expense associated with the awards granted for 2013 and 2014?
| 3.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
under the terms of the ansys , inc . long-term incentive plan , in the first quarter of 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , the company granted 100000 , 92500 and 80500 performance-based restricted stock units , respectively . vesting of the full award or a portion thereof is based on the company 2019s performance as measured by total shareholder return relative to the median percentage appreciation of the nasdaq composite index over a specified measurement period , subject to each participant 2019s continued employment with the company through the conclusion of the measurement period . the measurement period for the restricted stock units granted pursuant to the long-term incentive plan is a three-year period beginning january 1 of the year of the grant . each restricted stock unit relates to one share of the company 2019s common stock . the value of each restricted stock unit granted in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was estimated on the grant date to be $ 33.16 , $ 32.05 and $ 25.00 , respectively . the estimate of the grant-date value of the restricted stock units was made using a monte carlo simulation model . the determination of the fair value of the awards was affected by the grant date and a number of variables , each of which has been identified in the chart below . share-based compensation expense based on the fair value of the award is being recorded from the grant date through the conclusion of the three-year measurement period . on december 31 , 2012 , employees earned 76500 restricted stock units , which will be issued in the first quarter of 2013 . total compensation expense associated with the awards recorded for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 2.6 million , $ 1.6 million and $ 590000 , respectively . total compensation expense associated with the awards granted for the years ending december 31 , 2013 and 2014 is expected to be $ 2.2 million and $ 1.2 million , respectively. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>assumption used in monte carlo lattice pricing model</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2011 and 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>0.16% ( 0.16 % )</td><td>1.35% ( 1.35 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>0% ( 0 % )</td><td>0% ( 0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected volatility 2014ansys stock price</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td><td>40% ( 40 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>expected volatility 2014nasdaq composite index</td><td>20% ( 20 % )</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>expected term</td><td>2.80</td><td>2.90</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>correlation factor</td><td>0.75</td><td>0.70</td></tr></table> in accordance with the merger agreement , the company granted performance-based restricted stock units to key members of apache management and employees , with a maximum value of $ 13.0 million to be earned annually over a three-fiscal-year period beginning january 1 , 2012 . additional details regarding these awards are provided within note 3 . 14 . stock repurchase program in february 2012 , ansys announced that its board of directors approved an increase to its authorized stock repurchase program . under the company 2019s stock repurchase program , ansys repurchased 1.5 million shares during the year ended december 31 , 2012 at an average price per share of $ 63.65 , for a total cost of $ 95.5 million . during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , the company repurchased 247443 shares at an average price per share of $ 51.34 , for a total cost of $ 12.7 million . as of december 31 , 2012 , 1.5 million shares remained authorized for repurchase under the program . 15 . employee stock purchase plan the company 2019s 1996 employee stock purchase plan ( the 201cpurchase plan 201d ) was adopted by the board of directors on april 19 , 1996 and was subsequently approved by the company 2019s stockholders . the stockholders approved an amendment to the purchase plan on may 6 , 2004 to increase the number of shares available for offerings to 1.6 million shares . the purchase plan was amended and restated in 2007 . the purchase plan is administered by the compensation committee . offerings under the purchase plan commence on each february 1 and august 1 , and have a duration of six months . an employee who owns or is deemed to own shares of stock representing in excess of 5% ( 5 % ) of the combined voting power of all classes of stock of the company may not participate in the purchase plan . during each offering , an eligible employee may purchase shares under the purchase plan by authorizing payroll deductions of up to 10% ( 10 % ) of his or her cash compensation during the offering period . the maximum number of shares that may be purchased by any participating employee during any offering period is limited to 3840 shares ( as adjusted by the compensation committee from time to time ) . unless the employee has previously withdrawn from the offering , his accumulated payroll deductions will be used to purchase common stock on the last business day of the period at a price equal to 90% ( 90 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock on the first or last day of the offering period , whichever is lower . under applicable tax rules , an employee may purchase no more than $ 25000 worth of common stock in any calendar year . at december 31 , 2012 , 1233385 shares of common stock had been issued under the purchase plan , of which 1184082 were issued as of december 31 , 2011 . the total compensation expense recorded under the purchase plan during the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 710000 , $ 650000 and $ 500000 , respectively . table of contents .
Question: what is the sum of compensation expense associated with the awards granted for 2013 and 2014?
Answer: 3.4
Question: what is the average per year?
| 1.7 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>pmi</td><td>pmi peer group ( 1 )</td><td>s&p 500 index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>$ 108.50</td><td>$ 122.80</td><td>$ 132.40</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>$ 106.20</td><td>$ 132.50</td><td>$ 150.50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>$ 120.40</td><td>$ 143.50</td><td>$ 152.60</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2016</td><td>$ 130.80</td><td>$ 145.60</td><td>$ 170.80</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>$ 156.80</td><td>$ 172.70</td><td>$ 208.10</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year , except reynolds american inc . was removed following the completion of its acquisition by british american tobacco p.l.c . on july 25 , 2017 . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
Question: what was the change in the pmi's share price from 2012 to 2013?
| 8.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>pmi</td><td>pmi peer group ( 1 )</td><td>s&p 500 index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>$ 108.50</td><td>$ 122.80</td><td>$ 132.40</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>$ 106.20</td><td>$ 132.50</td><td>$ 150.50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>$ 120.40</td><td>$ 143.50</td><td>$ 152.60</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2016</td><td>$ 130.80</td><td>$ 145.60</td><td>$ 170.80</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>$ 156.80</td><td>$ 172.70</td><td>$ 208.10</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year , except reynolds american inc . was removed following the completion of its acquisition by british american tobacco p.l.c . on july 25 , 2017 . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
Question: what was the change in the pmi's share price from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 8.5
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to that price in 2012?
| 0.085 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>pmi</td><td>pmi peer group ( 1 )</td><td>s&p 500 index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>$ 108.50</td><td>$ 122.80</td><td>$ 132.40</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>$ 106.20</td><td>$ 132.50</td><td>$ 150.50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>$ 120.40</td><td>$ 143.50</td><td>$ 152.60</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2016</td><td>$ 130.80</td><td>$ 145.60</td><td>$ 170.80</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>$ 156.80</td><td>$ 172.70</td><td>$ 208.10</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year , except reynolds american inc . was removed following the completion of its acquisition by british american tobacco p.l.c . on july 25 , 2017 . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
Question: what was the change in the pmi's share price from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 8.5
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to that price in 2012?
Answer: 0.085
Question: and in the two years subsequent to this period, what was the change in the price of that share?
| 14.2 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>pmi</td><td>pmi peer group ( 1 )</td><td>s&p 500 index</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>$ 108.50</td><td>$ 122.80</td><td>$ 132.40</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>$ 106.20</td><td>$ 132.50</td><td>$ 150.50</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2015</td><td>$ 120.40</td><td>$ 143.50</td><td>$ 152.60</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2016</td><td>$ 130.80</td><td>$ 145.60</td><td>$ 170.80</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>$ 156.80</td><td>$ 172.70</td><td>$ 208.10</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year , except reynolds american inc . was removed following the completion of its acquisition by british american tobacco p.l.c . on july 25 , 2017 . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .
Question: what was the change in the pmi's share price from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 8.5
Question: and how much did this change represent in relation to that price in 2012?
Answer: 0.085
Question: and in the two years subsequent to this period, what was the change in the price of that share?
Answer: 14.2
Question: what is this change as a portion of the 2014 price?
| 0.13371 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
after reviewing earnings per share and operating cash flow results against the performance objectives in the above table , the personnel committee set the entergy achievement multiplier at 140% ( 140 % ) of target . under the terms of the executive incentive plan , the entergy achievement multiplier is automatically increased by 25 percent for the members of the office of the chief executive ( including mr . denault and mr . smith , but not the other named executive officers ) , subject to the personnel committee's discretion to adjust the automatic multiplier downward or eliminate it altogether . in accordance with section 162 ( m ) of the internal revenue code , the multiplier which entergy refers to as the management effectiveness factor is intended to provide the committee , through the exercise of negative discretion , a mechanism to take into consideration the specific achievement factors relating to the overall performance of entergy corporation . in january 2009 , the committee exercised its negative discretion to eliminate the management effectiveness factor , reflecting the personnel committee's determination that the entergy achievement multiplier , in and of itself without the management effectiveness factor , was consistent with the performance levels achieved by management . the annual incentive award for the named executive officers ( other than mr . leonard , mr . denault and mr . smith ) is awarded from an incentive pool approved by the committee . from this pool , each named executive officer's supervisor determines the annual incentive payment based on the entergy achievement multiplier . the supervisor has the discretion to increase or decrease the multiple used to determine an incentive award based on individual and business unit performance . the incentive awards are subject to the ultimate approval of entergy's chief executive officer . the following table shows the executive and management incentive plans payments as a percentage of base salary for 2008 : named exeutive officer target percentage base salary 2008 annual incentive award . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>named exeutive officer</td><td>target</td><td>percentage base salary</td><td>2008 annual incentive award</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>j . wayne leonard</td><td>120% ( 120 % )</td><td>168% ( 168 % )</td><td>$ 2169720</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>leo p . denault</td><td>70% ( 70 % )</td><td>98% ( 98 % )</td><td>$ 617400</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>richard j . smith</td><td>70% ( 70 % )</td><td>98% ( 98 % )</td><td>$ 632100</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>e . renae conley</td><td>60% ( 60 % )</td><td>102% ( 102 % )</td><td>$ 415000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>hugh t . mcdonald</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>$ 160500</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>joseph f . domino</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>72% ( 72 % )</td><td>$ 230000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>roderick k . west</td><td>40% ( 40 % )</td><td>80% ( 80 % )</td><td>$ 252000</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>haley fisackerly</td><td>40% ( 40 % )</td><td>46% ( 46 % )</td><td>$ 125700</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>theodore h . bunting jr .</td><td>60% ( 60 % )</td><td>117% ( 117 % )</td><td>$ 400023</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>carolyn shanks</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>72% ( 72 % )</td><td>$ 229134</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>jay a . lewis</td><td>40% ( 40 % )</td><td>60% ( 60 % )</td><td>$ 128505</td></tr></table> while ms . shanks and mr . lewis are no longer ceo-entergy mississippi and principal financial officer for the subsidiaries , respectively , ms . shanks continues to participate in the executive incentive plan , and mr . lewis continues to participate in the management incentive plan as they remain employees of entergy since the contemplated enexus separation has not occurred and enexus remains a subsidiary of entergy . nuclear retention plan some of entergy's executives , but not any of the named executive officers , participate in a special retention plan for officers and other leaders with special expertise in the nuclear industry . the committee authorized the plan to attract and retain management talent in the nuclear power field , a field which requires unique technical and other expertise that is in great demand in the utility industry . the plan provides for bonuses to be paid over a three-year employment period . subject to continued employment with a participating company , a participating employee is eligible to receive a special cash bonus consisting of three payments , each consisting of an amount from 15% ( 15 % ) to 30% ( 30 % ) of such participant's base salary. .
Question: what is the highest annual incentive award in 2008?
| 2169720.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
after reviewing earnings per share and operating cash flow results against the performance objectives in the above table , the personnel committee set the entergy achievement multiplier at 140% ( 140 % ) of target . under the terms of the executive incentive plan , the entergy achievement multiplier is automatically increased by 25 percent for the members of the office of the chief executive ( including mr . denault and mr . smith , but not the other named executive officers ) , subject to the personnel committee's discretion to adjust the automatic multiplier downward or eliminate it altogether . in accordance with section 162 ( m ) of the internal revenue code , the multiplier which entergy refers to as the management effectiveness factor is intended to provide the committee , through the exercise of negative discretion , a mechanism to take into consideration the specific achievement factors relating to the overall performance of entergy corporation . in january 2009 , the committee exercised its negative discretion to eliminate the management effectiveness factor , reflecting the personnel committee's determination that the entergy achievement multiplier , in and of itself without the management effectiveness factor , was consistent with the performance levels achieved by management . the annual incentive award for the named executive officers ( other than mr . leonard , mr . denault and mr . smith ) is awarded from an incentive pool approved by the committee . from this pool , each named executive officer's supervisor determines the annual incentive payment based on the entergy achievement multiplier . the supervisor has the discretion to increase or decrease the multiple used to determine an incentive award based on individual and business unit performance . the incentive awards are subject to the ultimate approval of entergy's chief executive officer . the following table shows the executive and management incentive plans payments as a percentage of base salary for 2008 : named exeutive officer target percentage base salary 2008 annual incentive award . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>named exeutive officer</td><td>target</td><td>percentage base salary</td><td>2008 annual incentive award</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>j . wayne leonard</td><td>120% ( 120 % )</td><td>168% ( 168 % )</td><td>$ 2169720</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>leo p . denault</td><td>70% ( 70 % )</td><td>98% ( 98 % )</td><td>$ 617400</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>richard j . smith</td><td>70% ( 70 % )</td><td>98% ( 98 % )</td><td>$ 632100</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>e . renae conley</td><td>60% ( 60 % )</td><td>102% ( 102 % )</td><td>$ 415000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>hugh t . mcdonald</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>$ 160500</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>joseph f . domino</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>72% ( 72 % )</td><td>$ 230000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>roderick k . west</td><td>40% ( 40 % )</td><td>80% ( 80 % )</td><td>$ 252000</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>haley fisackerly</td><td>40% ( 40 % )</td><td>46% ( 46 % )</td><td>$ 125700</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>theodore h . bunting jr .</td><td>60% ( 60 % )</td><td>117% ( 117 % )</td><td>$ 400023</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>carolyn shanks</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>72% ( 72 % )</td><td>$ 229134</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>jay a . lewis</td><td>40% ( 40 % )</td><td>60% ( 60 % )</td><td>$ 128505</td></tr></table> while ms . shanks and mr . lewis are no longer ceo-entergy mississippi and principal financial officer for the subsidiaries , respectively , ms . shanks continues to participate in the executive incentive plan , and mr . lewis continues to participate in the management incentive plan as they remain employees of entergy since the contemplated enexus separation has not occurred and enexus remains a subsidiary of entergy . nuclear retention plan some of entergy's executives , but not any of the named executive officers , participate in a special retention plan for officers and other leaders with special expertise in the nuclear industry . the committee authorized the plan to attract and retain management talent in the nuclear power field , a field which requires unique technical and other expertise that is in great demand in the utility industry . the plan provides for bonuses to be paid over a three-year employment period . subject to continued employment with a participating company , a participating employee is eligible to receive a special cash bonus consisting of three payments , each consisting of an amount from 15% ( 15 % ) to 30% ( 30 % ) of such participant's base salary. .
Question: what is the highest annual incentive award in 2008?
Answer: 2169720.0
Question: what about the lowest?
| 125700.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
after reviewing earnings per share and operating cash flow results against the performance objectives in the above table , the personnel committee set the entergy achievement multiplier at 140% ( 140 % ) of target . under the terms of the executive incentive plan , the entergy achievement multiplier is automatically increased by 25 percent for the members of the office of the chief executive ( including mr . denault and mr . smith , but not the other named executive officers ) , subject to the personnel committee's discretion to adjust the automatic multiplier downward or eliminate it altogether . in accordance with section 162 ( m ) of the internal revenue code , the multiplier which entergy refers to as the management effectiveness factor is intended to provide the committee , through the exercise of negative discretion , a mechanism to take into consideration the specific achievement factors relating to the overall performance of entergy corporation . in january 2009 , the committee exercised its negative discretion to eliminate the management effectiveness factor , reflecting the personnel committee's determination that the entergy achievement multiplier , in and of itself without the management effectiveness factor , was consistent with the performance levels achieved by management . the annual incentive award for the named executive officers ( other than mr . leonard , mr . denault and mr . smith ) is awarded from an incentive pool approved by the committee . from this pool , each named executive officer's supervisor determines the annual incentive payment based on the entergy achievement multiplier . the supervisor has the discretion to increase or decrease the multiple used to determine an incentive award based on individual and business unit performance . the incentive awards are subject to the ultimate approval of entergy's chief executive officer . the following table shows the executive and management incentive plans payments as a percentage of base salary for 2008 : named exeutive officer target percentage base salary 2008 annual incentive award . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>named exeutive officer</td><td>target</td><td>percentage base salary</td><td>2008 annual incentive award</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>j . wayne leonard</td><td>120% ( 120 % )</td><td>168% ( 168 % )</td><td>$ 2169720</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>leo p . denault</td><td>70% ( 70 % )</td><td>98% ( 98 % )</td><td>$ 617400</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>richard j . smith</td><td>70% ( 70 % )</td><td>98% ( 98 % )</td><td>$ 632100</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>e . renae conley</td><td>60% ( 60 % )</td><td>102% ( 102 % )</td><td>$ 415000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>hugh t . mcdonald</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>$ 160500</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>joseph f . domino</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>72% ( 72 % )</td><td>$ 230000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>roderick k . west</td><td>40% ( 40 % )</td><td>80% ( 80 % )</td><td>$ 252000</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>haley fisackerly</td><td>40% ( 40 % )</td><td>46% ( 46 % )</td><td>$ 125700</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>theodore h . bunting jr .</td><td>60% ( 60 % )</td><td>117% ( 117 % )</td><td>$ 400023</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>carolyn shanks</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>72% ( 72 % )</td><td>$ 229134</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>jay a . lewis</td><td>40% ( 40 % )</td><td>60% ( 60 % )</td><td>$ 128505</td></tr></table> while ms . shanks and mr . lewis are no longer ceo-entergy mississippi and principal financial officer for the subsidiaries , respectively , ms . shanks continues to participate in the executive incentive plan , and mr . lewis continues to participate in the management incentive plan as they remain employees of entergy since the contemplated enexus separation has not occurred and enexus remains a subsidiary of entergy . nuclear retention plan some of entergy's executives , but not any of the named executive officers , participate in a special retention plan for officers and other leaders with special expertise in the nuclear industry . the committee authorized the plan to attract and retain management talent in the nuclear power field , a field which requires unique technical and other expertise that is in great demand in the utility industry . the plan provides for bonuses to be paid over a three-year employment period . subject to continued employment with a participating company , a participating employee is eligible to receive a special cash bonus consisting of three payments , each consisting of an amount from 15% ( 15 % ) to 30% ( 30 % ) of such participant's base salary. .
Question: what is the highest annual incentive award in 2008?
Answer: 2169720.0
Question: what about the lowest?
Answer: 125700.0
Question: what is the difference among the highest and the lowest annual incentive award?
| 2044020.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
after reviewing earnings per share and operating cash flow results against the performance objectives in the above table , the personnel committee set the entergy achievement multiplier at 140% ( 140 % ) of target . under the terms of the executive incentive plan , the entergy achievement multiplier is automatically increased by 25 percent for the members of the office of the chief executive ( including mr . denault and mr . smith , but not the other named executive officers ) , subject to the personnel committee's discretion to adjust the automatic multiplier downward or eliminate it altogether . in accordance with section 162 ( m ) of the internal revenue code , the multiplier which entergy refers to as the management effectiveness factor is intended to provide the committee , through the exercise of negative discretion , a mechanism to take into consideration the specific achievement factors relating to the overall performance of entergy corporation . in january 2009 , the committee exercised its negative discretion to eliminate the management effectiveness factor , reflecting the personnel committee's determination that the entergy achievement multiplier , in and of itself without the management effectiveness factor , was consistent with the performance levels achieved by management . the annual incentive award for the named executive officers ( other than mr . leonard , mr . denault and mr . smith ) is awarded from an incentive pool approved by the committee . from this pool , each named executive officer's supervisor determines the annual incentive payment based on the entergy achievement multiplier . the supervisor has the discretion to increase or decrease the multiple used to determine an incentive award based on individual and business unit performance . the incentive awards are subject to the ultimate approval of entergy's chief executive officer . the following table shows the executive and management incentive plans payments as a percentage of base salary for 2008 : named exeutive officer target percentage base salary 2008 annual incentive award . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>named exeutive officer</td><td>target</td><td>percentage base salary</td><td>2008 annual incentive award</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>j . wayne leonard</td><td>120% ( 120 % )</td><td>168% ( 168 % )</td><td>$ 2169720</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>leo p . denault</td><td>70% ( 70 % )</td><td>98% ( 98 % )</td><td>$ 617400</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>richard j . smith</td><td>70% ( 70 % )</td><td>98% ( 98 % )</td><td>$ 632100</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>e . renae conley</td><td>60% ( 60 % )</td><td>102% ( 102 % )</td><td>$ 415000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>hugh t . mcdonald</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>$ 160500</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>joseph f . domino</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>72% ( 72 % )</td><td>$ 230000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>roderick k . west</td><td>40% ( 40 % )</td><td>80% ( 80 % )</td><td>$ 252000</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>haley fisackerly</td><td>40% ( 40 % )</td><td>46% ( 46 % )</td><td>$ 125700</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>theodore h . bunting jr .</td><td>60% ( 60 % )</td><td>117% ( 117 % )</td><td>$ 400023</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>carolyn shanks</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>72% ( 72 % )</td><td>$ 229134</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>jay a . lewis</td><td>40% ( 40 % )</td><td>60% ( 60 % )</td><td>$ 128505</td></tr></table> while ms . shanks and mr . lewis are no longer ceo-entergy mississippi and principal financial officer for the subsidiaries , respectively , ms . shanks continues to participate in the executive incentive plan , and mr . lewis continues to participate in the management incentive plan as they remain employees of entergy since the contemplated enexus separation has not occurred and enexus remains a subsidiary of entergy . nuclear retention plan some of entergy's executives , but not any of the named executive officers , participate in a special retention plan for officers and other leaders with special expertise in the nuclear industry . the committee authorized the plan to attract and retain management talent in the nuclear power field , a field which requires unique technical and other expertise that is in great demand in the utility industry . the plan provides for bonuses to be paid over a three-year employment period . subject to continued employment with a participating company , a participating employee is eligible to receive a special cash bonus consisting of three payments , each consisting of an amount from 15% ( 15 % ) to 30% ( 30 % ) of such participant's base salary. .
Question: what is the highest annual incentive award in 2008?
Answer: 2169720.0
Question: what about the lowest?
Answer: 125700.0
Question: what is the difference among the highest and the lowest annual incentive award?
Answer: 2044020.0
Question: what is the second highest annual incentive award?
| 632100.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
after reviewing earnings per share and operating cash flow results against the performance objectives in the above table , the personnel committee set the entergy achievement multiplier at 140% ( 140 % ) of target . under the terms of the executive incentive plan , the entergy achievement multiplier is automatically increased by 25 percent for the members of the office of the chief executive ( including mr . denault and mr . smith , but not the other named executive officers ) , subject to the personnel committee's discretion to adjust the automatic multiplier downward or eliminate it altogether . in accordance with section 162 ( m ) of the internal revenue code , the multiplier which entergy refers to as the management effectiveness factor is intended to provide the committee , through the exercise of negative discretion , a mechanism to take into consideration the specific achievement factors relating to the overall performance of entergy corporation . in january 2009 , the committee exercised its negative discretion to eliminate the management effectiveness factor , reflecting the personnel committee's determination that the entergy achievement multiplier , in and of itself without the management effectiveness factor , was consistent with the performance levels achieved by management . the annual incentive award for the named executive officers ( other than mr . leonard , mr . denault and mr . smith ) is awarded from an incentive pool approved by the committee . from this pool , each named executive officer's supervisor determines the annual incentive payment based on the entergy achievement multiplier . the supervisor has the discretion to increase or decrease the multiple used to determine an incentive award based on individual and business unit performance . the incentive awards are subject to the ultimate approval of entergy's chief executive officer . the following table shows the executive and management incentive plans payments as a percentage of base salary for 2008 : named exeutive officer target percentage base salary 2008 annual incentive award . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>named exeutive officer</td><td>target</td><td>percentage base salary</td><td>2008 annual incentive award</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>j . wayne leonard</td><td>120% ( 120 % )</td><td>168% ( 168 % )</td><td>$ 2169720</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>leo p . denault</td><td>70% ( 70 % )</td><td>98% ( 98 % )</td><td>$ 617400</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>richard j . smith</td><td>70% ( 70 % )</td><td>98% ( 98 % )</td><td>$ 632100</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>e . renae conley</td><td>60% ( 60 % )</td><td>102% ( 102 % )</td><td>$ 415000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>hugh t . mcdonald</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>$ 160500</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>joseph f . domino</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>72% ( 72 % )</td><td>$ 230000</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>roderick k . west</td><td>40% ( 40 % )</td><td>80% ( 80 % )</td><td>$ 252000</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>haley fisackerly</td><td>40% ( 40 % )</td><td>46% ( 46 % )</td><td>$ 125700</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>theodore h . bunting jr .</td><td>60% ( 60 % )</td><td>117% ( 117 % )</td><td>$ 400023</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>carolyn shanks</td><td>50% ( 50 % )</td><td>72% ( 72 % )</td><td>$ 229134</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>jay a . lewis</td><td>40% ( 40 % )</td><td>60% ( 60 % )</td><td>$ 128505</td></tr></table> while ms . shanks and mr . lewis are no longer ceo-entergy mississippi and principal financial officer for the subsidiaries , respectively , ms . shanks continues to participate in the executive incentive plan , and mr . lewis continues to participate in the management incentive plan as they remain employees of entergy since the contemplated enexus separation has not occurred and enexus remains a subsidiary of entergy . nuclear retention plan some of entergy's executives , but not any of the named executive officers , participate in a special retention plan for officers and other leaders with special expertise in the nuclear industry . the committee authorized the plan to attract and retain management talent in the nuclear power field , a field which requires unique technical and other expertise that is in great demand in the utility industry . the plan provides for bonuses to be paid over a three-year employment period . subject to continued employment with a participating company , a participating employee is eligible to receive a special cash bonus consisting of three payments , each consisting of an amount from 15% ( 15 % ) to 30% ( 30 % ) of such participant's base salary. .
Question: what is the highest annual incentive award in 2008?
Answer: 2169720.0
Question: what about the lowest?
Answer: 125700.0
Question: what is the difference among the highest and the lowest annual incentive award?
Answer: 2044020.0
Question: what is the second highest annual incentive award?
Answer: 632100.0
Question: what is the difference among the first two highest annual incentive award?
| 1537620.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|