input_seq2seq
stringlengths 40
578
| output_seq2seq
stringlengths 10
929
|
|---|---|
premise: People on bicycles waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: People on bicycles enjoy a conversation waiting for traffic. | neutral: Not all people enjoy conversation waiting for traffic. |
premise: People on bicycles waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: The people are trying to get to the convenience store across the street. | neutral: Not all people on bicycles are waiting at intersection are trying to get to the convenience store. |
premise: People on bicycles waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: People wait on traffic. | entailment: Waiting at an intersection implies wait on traffic. |
premise: People on bicycles waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: Some people on bikes are stopped at a junction. | neutral: Not all people on bicycles are stopped at a junction. |
premise: People on bicycles waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: People are waiting on foot. | contradiction: Intersections cannot be made a waiting area. |
premise: People on bicycles waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: There are bicyclists stopped at a road. | entailment: An intersection is a road. |
premise: People on bicycles waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: The people are sleeping. | contradiction: People on bicycles cannot be sleeping at the same time. |
premise: People on bicycles waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: The people are waiting for the movie to begin. | contradiction: Bicycles are not movies. |
premise: People on bicycles waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: More than one person on a bicycle is obeying traffic laws. | entailment: People imply more than one person. |
premise: People on bicycles waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: People are on mountain bikes. | neutral: Not all bicycles are mountain bikes. |
premise: People on bicycles waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: There are people on bicycles. | entailment: There are people on bicycles is a restatement of people on bicycles. |
premise: People on bicycles waiting at an intersection. hypothesis: People on bicycles speed through an intersection. | contradiction: People cannot be waiting and speeding at the same time. |
premise: A man with a red shirt is watching another man who is standing on top of a attached cart filled to the top. hypothesis: The cart is empty. | contradiction: A cart is either empty or filled. |
premise: A man with a red shirt is watching another man who is standing on top of a attached cart filled to the top. hypothesis: A man is giving another man a piggyback ride. | contradiction: One cannot do a piggyback ride in a cart filled to the top. |
premise: A man with a red shirt is watching another man who is standing on top of a attached cart filled to the top. hypothesis: A cart is full of items. | entailment: For a man to be standing on top of a filled cart, the cart must be full. |
premise: A man with a red shirt is watching another man who is standing on top of a attached cart filled to the top. hypothesis: A man is sleeping under a bench. | contradiction: Standing means the man is not sleeping. |
premise: A man with a red shirt is watching another man who is standing on top of a attached cart filled to the top. hypothesis: A man watches another man. | entailment: A man watches another man who is standing on a cart. |
premise: A man with a red shirt is watching another man who is standing on top of a attached cart filled to the top. hypothesis: A produce vendor is watched by a health department worker. | neutral: Not all health department workers wear red shirts. It can't be assumed someone standing on top of a attached cart filled to the top is a produce worker. |
premise: A man with a red shirt is watching another man who is standing on top of a attached cart filled to the top. hypothesis: Someone is on top of a cart full of items, while someone else observes. | entailment: Watching and observing have the same meaning. |
premise: A man with a red shirt is watching another man who is standing on top of a attached cart filled to the top. hypothesis: The man is watching a woman. | contradiction: If a man is watching another man he is not watching a woman. |
premise: A man with a red shirt is watching another man who is standing on top of a attached cart filled to the top. hypothesis: A merchant and his assistant are trying to determine how many products are in their cart. | neutral: Not all merchants wear red shirts. Not all coworkers are assistants. It can't be assumed someone is trying to determine how many products are in their cart by their position on top of a attached cart filled to the top. |
premise: A man with a red shirt is watching another man who is standing on top of a attached cart filled to the top. hypothesis: The cart is full of coal. | neutral: Not all carts are used to carry coal. |
premise: A man with a red shirt is watching another man who is standing on top of a attached cart filled to the top. hypothesis: A man is standing on top of a cart. | entailment: The man is standing on a cart filled to the top. |
premise: A man with a red shirt is watching another man who is standing on top of a attached cart filled to the top. hypothesis: The cart is filled to the top. | entailment: The cart is filled. |
premise: A man with a red shirt is watching another man who is standing on top of a attached cart filled to the top. hypothesis: The men are outside. | neutral: It can't be assumed someone is outside. |
premise: A man with a red shirt is watching another man who is standing on top of a attached cart filled to the top. hypothesis: A man eats octopus. | contradiction: If a man is standing on top of a cart he does not eat octopus. |
premise: A man with a red shirt is watching another man who is standing on top of a attached cart filled to the top. hypothesis: A man is standing on a cart full of groceries. | neutral: Not all carts carry groceries. |
premise: A boy is drinking out of a water fountain shaped like a woman. hypothesis: A male is getting a drink of water. | entailment: The boy is a male and water comes from a fountain. |
premise: A boy is drinking out of a water fountain shaped like a woman. hypothesis: A sculptor takes a drink from a fountain that he made that looks like his girlfriend. | neutral: Not everyone taking a drink from a water fountain is the sculptor. Not all sculptures shaped like a woman look like a girlfriend. |
premise: A boy is drinking out of a water fountain shaped like a woman. hypothesis: A man is drinking lemonade from a glass. | contradiction: A man is not a boy. Lemonade is not water. |
premise: three bikers stop in town. hypothesis: cars stop in town. | neutral: Cars do not necessarily stop when bikers stop. |
premise: three bikers stop in town. hypothesis: Bikers stop in towns. | entailment: three bikers implies bikers. |
premise: three bikers stop in town. hypothesis: A town has witnessed the arrival of three bikers. | entailment: The town witnessed the bikers in town. |
premise: three bikers stop in town. hypothesis: Thoes bikers are slowing down. | neutral: Slowing down does not mean bikers will stop. |
premise: three bikers stop in town. hypothesis: The bikers are riding Harley's. | neutral: Not all bikers ride Harley's. |
premise: three bikers stop in town. hypothesis: Three bikers are going 100 mph. | contradiction: If bikers stop they are not going 100 mph. |
premise: three bikers stop in town. hypothesis: The bikers breathe water. | contradiction: There can be more, less or equal to three bikers. |
premise: three bikers stop in town. hypothesis: Bikers stop for gas. | entailment: if bikers stop for gas the bikers have to stop to get gas. |
premise: three bikers stop in town. hypothesis: Three bicyclists are riding in a pack. | neutral: Three bikers does not imply riding in a pack. |
premise: three bikers stop in town. hypothesis: There is a very angry dog. | contradiction: Bikers are not a dog. A dog is not bikers. |
premise: three bikers stop in town. hypothesis: Three bikers are taking a rest in the town. | neutral: To stop does not imply taking a rest. |
premise: three bikers stop in town. hypothesis: The bikers are in the town. | entailment: Bikers who stop in town are also in the town. |
premise: three bikers stop in town. hypothesis: A group of bikers are in the street. | entailment: three bikers constitutes a group of bikers. |
premise: three bikers stop in town. hypothesis: The bikers didn't stop in the town. | contradiction: There can be less than, more than or equal to three bikers. Bikers either stop or don't stop in town. |
premise: three bikers stop in town. hypothesis: Five bikers are riding on the road. | contradiction: There are either three or five bikers. |
premise: Two people loading brush on a trailer attached to a truck. hypothesis: A man is carrying a canoe to the water. | contradiction: A man does not have to be one of the two people. |
premise: Two people loading brush on a trailer attached to a truck. hypothesis: A couple of people are loading brush onto a trailer that is attached to a truck. | entailment: Two people constitutes a couple of people. |
premise: Two people loading brush on a trailer attached to a truck. hypothesis: Two people loading brush on a trailer attached to a truck so they can go camping and burn it. | neutral: Loading brush onto a trailer does not imply it is to go camping and burn it. |
premise: A man with a beard, wearing a red shirt with gray sleeves and work gloves, pulling on a rope. hypothesis: a bearded man pulls a rope. | entailment: If the man has a beard and is pulling on a rope, it is likely he is the same bearded man pulling the rope. |
premise: A man with a beard, wearing a red shirt with gray sleeves and work gloves, pulling on a rope. hypothesis: A bearded man is pulling a rope at work. | neutral: It cannot be inferred that the man is at work. |
premise: A man with a beard, wearing a red shirt with gray sleeves and work gloves, pulling on a rope. hypothesis: A man pulls on a rope. | entailment: pulls on a rope is simply pulling on a rope reworded. |
premise: A man with a beard, wearing a red shirt with gray sleeves and work gloves, pulling on a rope. hypothesis: The man was on the job trying to move some equipment. | neutral: Pulling on a rope does not imply trying to move some equipment. |
premise: A man with a beard, wearing a red shirt with gray sleeves and work gloves, pulling on a rope. hypothesis: a man pulls his beard. | contradiction: Rope and beard are two different things to be pulling at the same time. |
premise: A man with a beard, wearing a red shirt with gray sleeves and work gloves, pulling on a rope. hypothesis: a bearded man is pulling a car with his teeth. | contradiction: Pulling a rope is different than pulling a car. |
premise: A man with a beard, wearing a red shirt with gray sleeves and work gloves, pulling on a rope. hypothesis: a man competes in a rope pulling contest. | neutral: Pulling on a rope does not imply competing in a rope pulling contest. |
premise: A man with a beard, wearing a red shirt with gray sleeves and work gloves, pulling on a rope. hypothesis: A man is trying to pull his car out of a lake. | neutral: Pulling on a rope does not imply trying to pull a car out of a lake. |
premise: A man with a beard, wearing a red shirt with gray sleeves and work gloves, pulling on a rope. hypothesis: The man was clean shaven. | contradiction: One with a beard is not clean shaven. |
premise: A man with a beard, wearing a red shirt with gray sleeves and work gloves, pulling on a rope. hypothesis: A bearded man is pulling on a rope. | entailment: A bearded man is simply a man with a beard reworded. |
premise: A man with a beard, wearing a red shirt with gray sleeves and work gloves, pulling on a rope. hypothesis: A man is dragging a sled behind him. | neutral: Pulling on a rope does not imply dragging a sled behind. |
premise: A man with a beard, wearing a red shirt with gray sleeves and work gloves, pulling on a rope. hypothesis: A man in a swimsuit, swings on a rope. | contradiction: A red shirt with gray sleeves is not the same as a swimsuit. |
premise: A man with a beard, wearing a red shirt with gray sleeves and work gloves, pulling on a rope. hypothesis: A man is wearing a black shirt. | contradiction: A red shirt is not black. |
premise: A man with a beard, wearing a red shirt with gray sleeves and work gloves, pulling on a rope. hypothesis: A man is pulling on a rope. | entailment: pulling on a rope means pulling on a rope. |
premise: A man with a beard, wearing a red shirt with gray sleeves and work gloves, pulling on a rope. hypothesis: The man is able to grow a beard. | entailment: a man having a beard implies that he is able to grow a beard. |
premise: A man with facial hair and a red and gray shirt tugging on a piece of rope. hypothesis: A man is naked on the bed. | contradiction: One with a red and gray shirt cannot be naked. |
premise: A man with facial hair and a red and gray shirt tugging on a piece of rope. hypothesis: A man is wearing a red and gray shirt. | neutral: A man with a red and gray shirt does imply a man is wearing a red and gray shirt. |
premise: A man with facial hair and a red and gray shirt tugging on a piece of rope. hypothesis: A man has facial hair. | entailment: a man with facial hair is simply a man has facial hair reworded. |
premise: A middle-aged oriental woman in a green headscarf and blue shirt is flashing a giant smile. hypothesis: The middle aged oriental woman is watchingt v. | contradiction: One is not usually flashing a giant smile while watching tv. |
premise: A middle-aged oriental woman in a green headscarf and blue shirt is flashing a giant smile. hypothesis: A middle aged oriental woman in a green headscarf and blue shirt is flashing a giant smile. | entailment: middle-aged and middle aged are both equally correct ways of conveying the same message. |
premise: A middle-aged oriental woman in a green headscarf and blue shirt is flashing a giant smile. hypothesis: The middle aged oriental woman is very happy. | neutral: Flashing a giant smile does not necessarily imply someone is very happy. |
premise: An Asian woman in a blue top and green headscarf smiling widely as another woman rows a boat in the background. hypothesis: An Asian woman is happy because she found money on the ground. | neutral: Smiling widely does not imply she found money on the ground. |
premise: An Asian woman in a blue top and green headscarf smiling widely as another woman rows a boat in the background. hypothesis: An Asian woman is smiling at while another lady is rowing. | entailment: another woman rows a boat is simply another lady is rowing reworded. |
premise: An Asian woman in a blue top and green headscarf smiling widely as another woman rows a boat in the background. hypothesis: An Asian woman is running from a dog. | contradiction: Smiling widely is not done while running from a dog. |
premise: A boat worker securing line. hypothesis: A worker is doing something to a boat. | entailment: a boat worker securing a line tells us that he is doing something to the boat. |
premise: A boat worker securing line. hypothesis: The boat worker is swimming in the ocean. | contradiction: One cannot be securing line while swimming. |
premise: A boat worker securing line. hypothesis: The boat worker works hard to establish the line. | neutral: Just because a boat worker is securing the line does not mean he is working hard. |
premise: A small girl with a necklace is swimming. hypothesis: A small girl with a necklace is swimming in a pool. | neutral: Sentence 1 doesn't indicate that the small girl is swimming in a pool. |
premise: A small girl with a necklace is swimming. hypothesis: A fat girl is diving off the edge. | contradiction: A small girl is not the same as a fat girl. |
premise: A small girl with a necklace is swimming. hypothesis: A small girl with a necklace is in the water. | entailment: The girl is swimming in the water. |
premise: a skateboarder skates in the pool. hypothesis: A skate swims in the pool. | contradiction: As one skates they cannot also swim. |
premise: a skateboarder skates in the pool. hypothesis: A skater is in the pool. | entailment: A skateboarder is a skater. |
premise: a skateboarder skates in the pool. hypothesis: A skater grinds on the lip of the pool. | neutral: Sentence 1 indicates simply that the skateboarder skates in the pool, not that he necessarily grinds or that he is on the lip of the pool. |
premise: A couple, who appear to be Indian or Pakistani, walk on a path beside a body of water, the mother carrying a child in a diaper, the father wrapped in a blanket with the logo of the humanitarian organization "Save the Children.". hypothesis: A man is wrapped in a UNICEF blanket. | contradiction: "Save the Children" and UNICEF are not the same organization. |
premise: A couple, who appear to be Indian or Pakistani, walk on a path beside a body of water, the mother carrying a child in a diaper, the father wrapped in a blanket with the logo of the humanitarian organization "Save the Children.". hypothesis: A couple carrying a child are walking along water. | entailment: A couple carrying a child is walking along a body of water,. |
premise: A couple, who appear to be Indian or Pakistani, walk on a path beside a body of water, the mother carrying a child in a diaper, the father wrapped in a blanket with the logo of the humanitarian organization "Save the Children.". hypothesis: An Indian couple is seeking refuge with a humanitarian organization. | neutral: Sentence 1 indicates that the couple appear Indian or Pakistani, not that the couple is definitely Indian. Also, just because the father is wrapped in a blanket with the logo of a humanitarian organization does not necessarily imply that the couple is seeking refuge from that organization. |
premise: There is a woman holding a baby, along with a man with a save the children bag. hypothesis: A group of people are possing for an add. | entailment: The people are posing for a save the children add. |
premise: There is a woman holding a baby, along with a man with a save the children bag. hypothesis: A man and a woman are hoding their son. | neutral: Nothing in Sentence 1 indicates that the baby is the son of the woman or man. |
premise: There is a woman holding a baby, along with a man with a save the children bag. hypothesis: A man is watching an airplane. | contradiction: No information about watching an airplane was included. |
premise: A family with a baby, the father is wearing a save the children sign. hypothesis: Three adults are pictured. | contradiction: Usually families have two adults and a baby was mentioned. |
premise: A family with a baby, the father is wearing a save the children sign. hypothesis: A man is wearing something with writing on it. | entailment: The something with writing on it is a Save The Children's side. |
premise: A family with a baby, the father is wearing a save the children sign. hypothesis: A woman is holding a baby. | neutral: Sentence 1 does not indicate that the woman is holding the baby or even that there is a woman in the family. |
premise: A foreign family is walking along a dirt path next to the water. hypothesis: they are riding a bike. | contradiction: Walking was mentioned, not riding a bike. |
premise: A foreign family is walking along a dirt path next to the water. hypothesis: People are walking next to a lake. | neutral: Sentence 1 does not indicate that the referenced water is a lake. |
premise: A foreign family is walking along a dirt path next to the water. hypothesis: A foreigner group of cousins hike along a trail next to a stream. | neutral: Sentence 1 does not indicate the family is a group of cousins, does not indicate that the walk is a hike (typically more strenuous), does not indicate that the dirt path is an established trail, and does not indicate that the water is a stream. |
premise: A foreign family is walking along a dirt path next to the water. hypothesis: A foreign family walks by a dirt trail along a body of water. | entailment: The family is walking along a body of water. |
premise: A foreign family is walking along a dirt path next to the water. hypothesis: The family is admiring the water. | entailment: The family is admiring the water while being next to the water. |
premise: A foreign family is walking along a dirt path next to the water. hypothesis: The people are driving a car on the freeway. | contradiction: It said walking and a dirt path, not driving a car on the freeway. |
premise: A foreign family is walking along a dirt path next to the water. hypothesis: A family of foreigners swims in the water. | contradiction: The family cannot walk along a dirt path while it swims in the water. |
premise: A foreign family is walking along a dirt path next to the water. hypothesis: they are trying not to fall in the water. | neutral: Sentence 1 does not indicate the family is trying not to fall in the water, simply that they are walking next to it. |
premise: A foreign family is walking along a dirt path next to the water. hypothesis: A group of locals run on a dirt trail next to a frozen stream. | contradiction: Locals cannot be a foreign family. |
premise: A foreign family is walking along a dirt path next to the water. hypothesis: A family of foreigners walks by the water. | entailment: The family is walking the dirt path next to the water. |