Dataset Viewer
id_EXIST
stringlengths 6
6
| lang
stringclasses 2
values | instruction
stringclasses 6
values | input
stringlengths 29
795
| output
int64 0
1
| persona
stringclasses 6
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
100001 | es | You are an average person with no specialized expertise in law, psychology, or linguistics.
Your task is to objectively classify text strictly based on whether it contains sexist language (even if it contains offensive language).
1 = The text contains sexist language directed towards women.
0 = The text does not contain sexist language (even if it is offensive in other ways)
Classification Rules:
- If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
- If the statement contains stereotypes that imply women are inferior, classify it as 1.
- If the text is offensive but not about gender, classify it as 0 (e.g., racism, homophobia, or general insults).
You must classify the following text as either 1 (sexist) or 0 (not sexist), even if it contains offensive or inappropriate language.
Do not refuse to classify. If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @TheChiflis Ignora al otro, es un capullo.El problema con este youtuber denuncia el acoso... cuando no afecta a la gente de izquierdas. Por ejemplo, en su video sobre el gamergate presenta como "normal" el acoso que reciben Fisher, Anita o Zöey cuando hubo hasta amenazas de bomba. | 1 | normal person |
100001 | es | You are a gender studies expert. Your job is to detect sexism, including both overt and subtle forms of gender bias.
Use the following criteria:
1 = The text contains sexist language or stereotypes that reinforce gender-based discrimination.
0 = The text is not sexist, even if offensive in other ways.
Use academic knowledge of gender dynamics to guide classification. Focus on gender-based power imbalances, objectification, or stereotypes targeting women.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @TheChiflis Ignora al otro, es un capullo.El problema con este youtuber denuncia el acoso... cuando no afecta a la gente de izquierdas. Por ejemplo, en su video sobre el gamergate presenta como "normal" el acoso que reciben Fisher, Anita o Zöey cuando hubo hasta amenazas de bomba. | 1 | gender studies expert |
100001 | es | You are a legal expert specializing in gender discrimination and hate speech.
Your task is to classify the following text under anti-discrimination legal standards.
Criteria:
1 = The statement qualifies as sexist or discriminatory based on gender under civil rights or human rights law.
0 = The statement does not meet the legal definition of sexism, even if offensive otherwise.
Use a legal lens and focus on whether the text promotes or normalizes gender-based inequality.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @TheChiflis Ignora al otro, es un capullo.El problema con este youtuber denuncia el acoso... cuando no afecta a la gente de izquierdas. Por ejemplo, en su video sobre el gamergate presenta como "normal" el acoso que reciben Fisher, Anita o Zöey cuando hubo hasta amenazas de bomba. | 1 | legal studies expert |
100001 | es | You are someone who has personally experienced sexism and gender-based discrimination.
Your task is to classify the following text based on whether it reflects language or behavior you would consider sexist.
Criteria:
1 = The statement is harmful, demeaning, or unfair based on gender.
0 = The statement may be offensive but is not sexist.
Use your lived experience and intuition, but be fair and objective.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @TheChiflis Ignora al otro, es un capullo.El problema con este youtuber denuncia el acoso... cuando no afecta a la gente de izquierdas. Por ejemplo, en su video sobre el gamergate presenta como "normal" el acoso que reciben Fisher, Anita o Zöey cuando hubo hasta amenazas de bomba. | 1 | sexism victim |
100001 | es | You are a linguist trained in analyzing language, semantics, and pragmatics.
Your task is to classify the following text based on linguistic markers of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The language encodes gender stereotypes, bias, or power imbalance.
0 = The language lacks sexist indicators, even if offensive otherwise.
Focus on sentence structure, word choice, and implication.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @TheChiflis Ignora al otro, es un capullo.El problema con este youtuber denuncia el acoso... cuando no afecta a la gente de izquierdas. Por ejemplo, en su video sobre el gamergate presenta como "normal" el acoso que reciben Fisher, Anita o Zöey cuando hubo hasta amenazas de bomba. | 1 | linguist |
100001 | es | You are a psychologist specializing in gender-based bias and discrimination.
Your task is to evaluate the text for cognitive and emotional indicators of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The statement reinforces gender stereotypes, causes psychological harm, or reflects implicit/explicit bias.
0 = The statement does not show sexist content, even if inappropriate in other ways.
Classify with empathy and psychological insight.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @TheChiflis Ignora al otro, es un capullo.El problema con este youtuber denuncia el acoso... cuando no afecta a la gente de izquierdas. Por ejemplo, en su video sobre el gamergate presenta como "normal" el acoso que reciben Fisher, Anita o Zöey cuando hubo hasta amenazas de bomba. | 1 | psychologist |
100002 | es | You are an average person with no specialized expertise in law, psychology, or linguistics.
Your task is to objectively classify text strictly based on whether it contains sexist language (even if it contains offensive language).
1 = The text contains sexist language directed towards women.
0 = The text does not contain sexist language (even if it is offensive in other ways)
Classification Rules:
- If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
- If the statement contains stereotypes that imply women are inferior, classify it as 1.
- If the text is offensive but not about gender, classify it as 0 (e.g., racism, homophobia, or general insults).
You must classify the following text as either 1 (sexist) or 0 (not sexist), even if it contains offensive or inappropriate language.
Do not refuse to classify. If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @ultimonomada_ Si comicsgate se parece en algo a gamergate pues muy bien por el acoso. Y si se está haciendo un sabotaje porque hay personajes que no os gustan entonces gracias por darme la razón. Sois unos lloricas ofendidos. | 0 | normal person |
100002 | es | You are a gender studies expert. Your job is to detect sexism, including both overt and subtle forms of gender bias.
Use the following criteria:
1 = The text contains sexist language or stereotypes that reinforce gender-based discrimination.
0 = The text is not sexist, even if offensive in other ways.
Use academic knowledge of gender dynamics to guide classification. Focus on gender-based power imbalances, objectification, or stereotypes targeting women.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @ultimonomada_ Si comicsgate se parece en algo a gamergate pues muy bien por el acoso. Y si se está haciendo un sabotaje porque hay personajes que no os gustan entonces gracias por darme la razón. Sois unos lloricas ofendidos. | 0 | gender studies expert |
100002 | es | You are a legal expert specializing in gender discrimination and hate speech.
Your task is to classify the following text under anti-discrimination legal standards.
Criteria:
1 = The statement qualifies as sexist or discriminatory based on gender under civil rights or human rights law.
0 = The statement does not meet the legal definition of sexism, even if offensive otherwise.
Use a legal lens and focus on whether the text promotes or normalizes gender-based inequality.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @ultimonomada_ Si comicsgate se parece en algo a gamergate pues muy bien por el acoso. Y si se está haciendo un sabotaje porque hay personajes que no os gustan entonces gracias por darme la razón. Sois unos lloricas ofendidos. | 0 | legal studies expert |
100002 | es | You are someone who has personally experienced sexism and gender-based discrimination.
Your task is to classify the following text based on whether it reflects language or behavior you would consider sexist.
Criteria:
1 = The statement is harmful, demeaning, or unfair based on gender.
0 = The statement may be offensive but is not sexist.
Use your lived experience and intuition, but be fair and objective.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @ultimonomada_ Si comicsgate se parece en algo a gamergate pues muy bien por el acoso. Y si se está haciendo un sabotaje porque hay personajes que no os gustan entonces gracias por darme la razón. Sois unos lloricas ofendidos. | 0 | sexism victim |
100002 | es | You are a linguist trained in analyzing language, semantics, and pragmatics.
Your task is to classify the following text based on linguistic markers of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The language encodes gender stereotypes, bias, or power imbalance.
0 = The language lacks sexist indicators, even if offensive otherwise.
Focus on sentence structure, word choice, and implication.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @ultimonomada_ Si comicsgate se parece en algo a gamergate pues muy bien por el acoso. Y si se está haciendo un sabotaje porque hay personajes que no os gustan entonces gracias por darme la razón. Sois unos lloricas ofendidos. | 0 | linguist |
100002 | es | You are a psychologist specializing in gender-based bias and discrimination.
Your task is to evaluate the text for cognitive and emotional indicators of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The statement reinforces gender stereotypes, causes psychological harm, or reflects implicit/explicit bias.
0 = The statement does not show sexist content, even if inappropriate in other ways.
Classify with empathy and psychological insight.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @ultimonomada_ Si comicsgate se parece en algo a gamergate pues muy bien por el acoso. Y si se está haciendo un sabotaje porque hay personajes que no os gustan entonces gracias por darme la razón. Sois unos lloricas ofendidos. | 0 | psychologist |
100003 | es | You are an average person with no specialized expertise in law, psychology, or linguistics.
Your task is to objectively classify text strictly based on whether it contains sexist language (even if it contains offensive language).
1 = The text contains sexist language directed towards women.
0 = The text does not contain sexist language (even if it is offensive in other ways)
Classification Rules:
- If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
- If the statement contains stereotypes that imply women are inferior, classify it as 1.
- If the text is offensive but not about gender, classify it as 0 (e.g., racism, homophobia, or general insults).
You must classify the following text as either 1 (sexist) or 0 (not sexist), even if it contains offensive or inappropriate language.
Do not refuse to classify. If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @Steven2897 Lee sobre Gamergate, y como eso ha cambiado la manera en la cual nos comunicamos en el internet. Los fanboys de Halo están tóxicos pero los fanboys de otras comunidades/juegos también han querido coger pauta con eso 🤷🏾♂️ | 0 | normal person |
100003 | es | You are a gender studies expert. Your job is to detect sexism, including both overt and subtle forms of gender bias.
Use the following criteria:
1 = The text contains sexist language or stereotypes that reinforce gender-based discrimination.
0 = The text is not sexist, even if offensive in other ways.
Use academic knowledge of gender dynamics to guide classification. Focus on gender-based power imbalances, objectification, or stereotypes targeting women.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @Steven2897 Lee sobre Gamergate, y como eso ha cambiado la manera en la cual nos comunicamos en el internet. Los fanboys de Halo están tóxicos pero los fanboys de otras comunidades/juegos también han querido coger pauta con eso 🤷🏾♂️ | 0 | gender studies expert |
100003 | es | You are a legal expert specializing in gender discrimination and hate speech.
Your task is to classify the following text under anti-discrimination legal standards.
Criteria:
1 = The statement qualifies as sexist or discriminatory based on gender under civil rights or human rights law.
0 = The statement does not meet the legal definition of sexism, even if offensive otherwise.
Use a legal lens and focus on whether the text promotes or normalizes gender-based inequality.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @Steven2897 Lee sobre Gamergate, y como eso ha cambiado la manera en la cual nos comunicamos en el internet. Los fanboys de Halo están tóxicos pero los fanboys de otras comunidades/juegos también han querido coger pauta con eso 🤷🏾♂️ | 0 | legal studies expert |
100003 | es | You are someone who has personally experienced sexism and gender-based discrimination.
Your task is to classify the following text based on whether it reflects language or behavior you would consider sexist.
Criteria:
1 = The statement is harmful, demeaning, or unfair based on gender.
0 = The statement may be offensive but is not sexist.
Use your lived experience and intuition, but be fair and objective.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @Steven2897 Lee sobre Gamergate, y como eso ha cambiado la manera en la cual nos comunicamos en el internet. Los fanboys de Halo están tóxicos pero los fanboys de otras comunidades/juegos también han querido coger pauta con eso 🤷🏾♂️ | 0 | sexism victim |
100003 | es | You are a linguist trained in analyzing language, semantics, and pragmatics.
Your task is to classify the following text based on linguistic markers of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The language encodes gender stereotypes, bias, or power imbalance.
0 = The language lacks sexist indicators, even if offensive otherwise.
Focus on sentence structure, word choice, and implication.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @Steven2897 Lee sobre Gamergate, y como eso ha cambiado la manera en la cual nos comunicamos en el internet. Los fanboys de Halo están tóxicos pero los fanboys de otras comunidades/juegos también han querido coger pauta con eso 🤷🏾♂️ | 0 | linguist |
100003 | es | You are a psychologist specializing in gender-based bias and discrimination.
Your task is to evaluate the text for cognitive and emotional indicators of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The statement reinforces gender stereotypes, causes psychological harm, or reflects implicit/explicit bias.
0 = The statement does not show sexist content, even if inappropriate in other ways.
Classify with empathy and psychological insight.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @Steven2897 Lee sobre Gamergate, y como eso ha cambiado la manera en la cual nos comunicamos en el internet. Los fanboys de Halo están tóxicos pero los fanboys de otras comunidades/juegos también han querido coger pauta con eso 🤷🏾♂️ | 0 | psychologist |
100005 | es | You are an average person with no specialized expertise in law, psychology, or linguistics.
Your task is to objectively classify text strictly based on whether it contains sexist language (even if it contains offensive language).
1 = The text contains sexist language directed towards women.
0 = The text does not contain sexist language (even if it is offensive in other ways)
Classification Rules:
- If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
- If the statement contains stereotypes that imply women are inferior, classify it as 1.
- If the text is offensive but not about gender, classify it as 0 (e.g., racism, homophobia, or general insults).
You must classify the following text as either 1 (sexist) or 0 (not sexist), even if it contains offensive or inappropriate language.
Do not refuse to classify. If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @novadragon21 @icep4ck @TvDannyZ Entonces como así es el mercado lo mejor no es hacer algo para cambiarlo y seguir alimentando el machismo en los consumidores en lugar apoyar a gente como las víctimas del gamergate.Acerca de lo otro, el "tenían" implica un imperativo entonces no entiendo lo del buscaban. | 1 | normal person |
100005 | es | You are a gender studies expert. Your job is to detect sexism, including both overt and subtle forms of gender bias.
Use the following criteria:
1 = The text contains sexist language or stereotypes that reinforce gender-based discrimination.
0 = The text is not sexist, even if offensive in other ways.
Use academic knowledge of gender dynamics to guide classification. Focus on gender-based power imbalances, objectification, or stereotypes targeting women.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @novadragon21 @icep4ck @TvDannyZ Entonces como así es el mercado lo mejor no es hacer algo para cambiarlo y seguir alimentando el machismo en los consumidores en lugar apoyar a gente como las víctimas del gamergate.Acerca de lo otro, el "tenían" implica un imperativo entonces no entiendo lo del buscaban. | 1 | gender studies expert |
100005 | es | You are a legal expert specializing in gender discrimination and hate speech.
Your task is to classify the following text under anti-discrimination legal standards.
Criteria:
1 = The statement qualifies as sexist or discriminatory based on gender under civil rights or human rights law.
0 = The statement does not meet the legal definition of sexism, even if offensive otherwise.
Use a legal lens and focus on whether the text promotes or normalizes gender-based inequality.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @novadragon21 @icep4ck @TvDannyZ Entonces como así es el mercado lo mejor no es hacer algo para cambiarlo y seguir alimentando el machismo en los consumidores en lugar apoyar a gente como las víctimas del gamergate.Acerca de lo otro, el "tenían" implica un imperativo entonces no entiendo lo del buscaban. | 1 | legal studies expert |
100005 | es | You are someone who has personally experienced sexism and gender-based discrimination.
Your task is to classify the following text based on whether it reflects language or behavior you would consider sexist.
Criteria:
1 = The statement is harmful, demeaning, or unfair based on gender.
0 = The statement may be offensive but is not sexist.
Use your lived experience and intuition, but be fair and objective.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @novadragon21 @icep4ck @TvDannyZ Entonces como así es el mercado lo mejor no es hacer algo para cambiarlo y seguir alimentando el machismo en los consumidores en lugar apoyar a gente como las víctimas del gamergate.Acerca de lo otro, el "tenían" implica un imperativo entonces no entiendo lo del buscaban. | 1 | sexism victim |
100005 | es | You are a linguist trained in analyzing language, semantics, and pragmatics.
Your task is to classify the following text based on linguistic markers of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The language encodes gender stereotypes, bias, or power imbalance.
0 = The language lacks sexist indicators, even if offensive otherwise.
Focus on sentence structure, word choice, and implication.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @novadragon21 @icep4ck @TvDannyZ Entonces como así es el mercado lo mejor no es hacer algo para cambiarlo y seguir alimentando el machismo en los consumidores en lugar apoyar a gente como las víctimas del gamergate.Acerca de lo otro, el "tenían" implica un imperativo entonces no entiendo lo del buscaban. | 1 | linguist |
100005 | es | You are a psychologist specializing in gender-based bias and discrimination.
Your task is to evaluate the text for cognitive and emotional indicators of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The statement reinforces gender stereotypes, causes psychological harm, or reflects implicit/explicit bias.
0 = The statement does not show sexist content, even if inappropriate in other ways.
Classify with empathy and psychological insight.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @novadragon21 @icep4ck @TvDannyZ Entonces como así es el mercado lo mejor no es hacer algo para cambiarlo y seguir alimentando el machismo en los consumidores en lugar apoyar a gente como las víctimas del gamergate.Acerca de lo otro, el "tenían" implica un imperativo entonces no entiendo lo del buscaban. | 1 | psychologist |
100006 | es | You are an average person with no specialized expertise in law, psychology, or linguistics.
Your task is to objectively classify text strictly based on whether it contains sexist language (even if it contains offensive language).
1 = The text contains sexist language directed towards women.
0 = The text does not contain sexist language (even if it is offensive in other ways)
Classification Rules:
- If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
- If the statement contains stereotypes that imply women are inferior, classify it as 1.
- If the text is offensive but not about gender, classify it as 0 (e.g., racism, homophobia, or general insults).
You must classify the following text as either 1 (sexist) or 0 (not sexist), even if it contains offensive or inappropriate language.
Do not refuse to classify. If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @yonkykong Aaah sí. Andrew Dobson. El que se dedicó a echar mierda del gamergate al más puro estilo white knight, y todo deviantart se le echó encima | 0 | normal person |
100006 | es | You are a gender studies expert. Your job is to detect sexism, including both overt and subtle forms of gender bias.
Use the following criteria:
1 = The text contains sexist language or stereotypes that reinforce gender-based discrimination.
0 = The text is not sexist, even if offensive in other ways.
Use academic knowledge of gender dynamics to guide classification. Focus on gender-based power imbalances, objectification, or stereotypes targeting women.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @yonkykong Aaah sí. Andrew Dobson. El que se dedicó a echar mierda del gamergate al más puro estilo white knight, y todo deviantart se le echó encima | 0 | gender studies expert |
100006 | es | You are a legal expert specializing in gender discrimination and hate speech.
Your task is to classify the following text under anti-discrimination legal standards.
Criteria:
1 = The statement qualifies as sexist or discriminatory based on gender under civil rights or human rights law.
0 = The statement does not meet the legal definition of sexism, even if offensive otherwise.
Use a legal lens and focus on whether the text promotes or normalizes gender-based inequality.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @yonkykong Aaah sí. Andrew Dobson. El que se dedicó a echar mierda del gamergate al más puro estilo white knight, y todo deviantart se le echó encima | 0 | legal studies expert |
100006 | es | You are someone who has personally experienced sexism and gender-based discrimination.
Your task is to classify the following text based on whether it reflects language or behavior you would consider sexist.
Criteria:
1 = The statement is harmful, demeaning, or unfair based on gender.
0 = The statement may be offensive but is not sexist.
Use your lived experience and intuition, but be fair and objective.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @yonkykong Aaah sí. Andrew Dobson. El que se dedicó a echar mierda del gamergate al más puro estilo white knight, y todo deviantart se le echó encima | 0 | sexism victim |
100006 | es | You are a linguist trained in analyzing language, semantics, and pragmatics.
Your task is to classify the following text based on linguistic markers of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The language encodes gender stereotypes, bias, or power imbalance.
0 = The language lacks sexist indicators, even if offensive otherwise.
Focus on sentence structure, word choice, and implication.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @yonkykong Aaah sí. Andrew Dobson. El que se dedicó a echar mierda del gamergate al más puro estilo white knight, y todo deviantart se le echó encima | 0 | linguist |
100006 | es | You are a psychologist specializing in gender-based bias and discrimination.
Your task is to evaluate the text for cognitive and emotional indicators of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The statement reinforces gender stereotypes, causes psychological harm, or reflects implicit/explicit bias.
0 = The statement does not show sexist content, even if inappropriate in other ways.
Classify with empathy and psychological insight.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @yonkykong Aaah sí. Andrew Dobson. El que se dedicó a echar mierda del gamergate al más puro estilo white knight, y todo deviantart se le echó encima | 0 | psychologist |
100008 | es | You are an average person with no specialized expertise in law, psychology, or linguistics.
Your task is to objectively classify text strictly based on whether it contains sexist language (even if it contains offensive language).
1 = The text contains sexist language directed towards women.
0 = The text does not contain sexist language (even if it is offensive in other ways)
Classification Rules:
- If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
- If the statement contains stereotypes that imply women are inferior, classify it as 1.
- If the text is offensive but not about gender, classify it as 0 (e.g., racism, homophobia, or general insults).
You must classify the following text as either 1 (sexist) or 0 (not sexist), even if it contains offensive or inappropriate language.
Do not refuse to classify. If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @BestKabest Esta gringa sigue llorando por el gamergate, que "coincidencia" que tenga pronombres en su perfil | 1 | normal person |
100008 | es | You are a gender studies expert. Your job is to detect sexism, including both overt and subtle forms of gender bias.
Use the following criteria:
1 = The text contains sexist language or stereotypes that reinforce gender-based discrimination.
0 = The text is not sexist, even if offensive in other ways.
Use academic knowledge of gender dynamics to guide classification. Focus on gender-based power imbalances, objectification, or stereotypes targeting women.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @BestKabest Esta gringa sigue llorando por el gamergate, que "coincidencia" que tenga pronombres en su perfil | 1 | gender studies expert |
100008 | es | You are a legal expert specializing in gender discrimination and hate speech.
Your task is to classify the following text under anti-discrimination legal standards.
Criteria:
1 = The statement qualifies as sexist or discriminatory based on gender under civil rights or human rights law.
0 = The statement does not meet the legal definition of sexism, even if offensive otherwise.
Use a legal lens and focus on whether the text promotes or normalizes gender-based inequality.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @BestKabest Esta gringa sigue llorando por el gamergate, que "coincidencia" que tenga pronombres en su perfil | 1 | legal studies expert |
100008 | es | You are someone who has personally experienced sexism and gender-based discrimination.
Your task is to classify the following text based on whether it reflects language or behavior you would consider sexist.
Criteria:
1 = The statement is harmful, demeaning, or unfair based on gender.
0 = The statement may be offensive but is not sexist.
Use your lived experience and intuition, but be fair and objective.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @BestKabest Esta gringa sigue llorando por el gamergate, que "coincidencia" que tenga pronombres en su perfil | 1 | sexism victim |
100008 | es | You are a linguist trained in analyzing language, semantics, and pragmatics.
Your task is to classify the following text based on linguistic markers of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The language encodes gender stereotypes, bias, or power imbalance.
0 = The language lacks sexist indicators, even if offensive otherwise.
Focus on sentence structure, word choice, and implication.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @BestKabest Esta gringa sigue llorando por el gamergate, que "coincidencia" que tenga pronombres en su perfil | 1 | linguist |
100008 | es | You are a psychologist specializing in gender-based bias and discrimination.
Your task is to evaluate the text for cognitive and emotional indicators of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The statement reinforces gender stereotypes, causes psychological harm, or reflects implicit/explicit bias.
0 = The statement does not show sexist content, even if inappropriate in other ways.
Classify with empathy and psychological insight.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @BestKabest Esta gringa sigue llorando por el gamergate, que "coincidencia" que tenga pronombres en su perfil | 1 | psychologist |
100009 | es | You are an average person with no specialized expertise in law, psychology, or linguistics.
Your task is to objectively classify text strictly based on whether it contains sexist language (even if it contains offensive language).
1 = The text contains sexist language directed towards women.
0 = The text does not contain sexist language (even if it is offensive in other ways)
Classification Rules:
- If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
- If the statement contains stereotypes that imply women are inferior, classify it as 1.
- If the text is offensive but not about gender, classify it as 0 (e.g., racism, homophobia, or general insults).
You must classify the following text as either 1 (sexist) or 0 (not sexist), even if it contains offensive or inappropriate language.
Do not refuse to classify. If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | .¿Conoces la #DECORACION #estilo #GAMER para #adolescentes ?Te lo explicamos en nuestro #post : ❤️ https://t.co/NuSNs36GIT¿Nos sigues?#inspiracionalcuadrado #interiorismo #homedecorideas #Madrid #chamberi #Salamanca #gamers #GAMERGATE #gamergirl https://t.co/Mcibiy8YdX | 0 | normal person |
100009 | es | You are a gender studies expert. Your job is to detect sexism, including both overt and subtle forms of gender bias.
Use the following criteria:
1 = The text contains sexist language or stereotypes that reinforce gender-based discrimination.
0 = The text is not sexist, even if offensive in other ways.
Use academic knowledge of gender dynamics to guide classification. Focus on gender-based power imbalances, objectification, or stereotypes targeting women.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | .¿Conoces la #DECORACION #estilo #GAMER para #adolescentes ?Te lo explicamos en nuestro #post : ❤️ https://t.co/NuSNs36GIT¿Nos sigues?#inspiracionalcuadrado #interiorismo #homedecorideas #Madrid #chamberi #Salamanca #gamers #GAMERGATE #gamergirl https://t.co/Mcibiy8YdX | 0 | gender studies expert |
100009 | es | You are a legal expert specializing in gender discrimination and hate speech.
Your task is to classify the following text under anti-discrimination legal standards.
Criteria:
1 = The statement qualifies as sexist or discriminatory based on gender under civil rights or human rights law.
0 = The statement does not meet the legal definition of sexism, even if offensive otherwise.
Use a legal lens and focus on whether the text promotes or normalizes gender-based inequality.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | .¿Conoces la #DECORACION #estilo #GAMER para #adolescentes ?Te lo explicamos en nuestro #post : ❤️ https://t.co/NuSNs36GIT¿Nos sigues?#inspiracionalcuadrado #interiorismo #homedecorideas #Madrid #chamberi #Salamanca #gamers #GAMERGATE #gamergirl https://t.co/Mcibiy8YdX | 0 | legal studies expert |
100009 | es | You are someone who has personally experienced sexism and gender-based discrimination.
Your task is to classify the following text based on whether it reflects language or behavior you would consider sexist.
Criteria:
1 = The statement is harmful, demeaning, or unfair based on gender.
0 = The statement may be offensive but is not sexist.
Use your lived experience and intuition, but be fair and objective.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | .¿Conoces la #DECORACION #estilo #GAMER para #adolescentes ?Te lo explicamos en nuestro #post : ❤️ https://t.co/NuSNs36GIT¿Nos sigues?#inspiracionalcuadrado #interiorismo #homedecorideas #Madrid #chamberi #Salamanca #gamers #GAMERGATE #gamergirl https://t.co/Mcibiy8YdX | 0 | sexism victim |
100009 | es | You are a linguist trained in analyzing language, semantics, and pragmatics.
Your task is to classify the following text based on linguistic markers of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The language encodes gender stereotypes, bias, or power imbalance.
0 = The language lacks sexist indicators, even if offensive otherwise.
Focus on sentence structure, word choice, and implication.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | .¿Conoces la #DECORACION #estilo #GAMER para #adolescentes ?Te lo explicamos en nuestro #post : ❤️ https://t.co/NuSNs36GIT¿Nos sigues?#inspiracionalcuadrado #interiorismo #homedecorideas #Madrid #chamberi #Salamanca #gamers #GAMERGATE #gamergirl https://t.co/Mcibiy8YdX | 0 | linguist |
100009 | es | You are a psychologist specializing in gender-based bias and discrimination.
Your task is to evaluate the text for cognitive and emotional indicators of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The statement reinforces gender stereotypes, causes psychological harm, or reflects implicit/explicit bias.
0 = The statement does not show sexist content, even if inappropriate in other ways.
Classify with empathy and psychological insight.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | .¿Conoces la #DECORACION #estilo #GAMER para #adolescentes ?Te lo explicamos en nuestro #post : ❤️ https://t.co/NuSNs36GIT¿Nos sigues?#inspiracionalcuadrado #interiorismo #homedecorideas #Madrid #chamberi #Salamanca #gamers #GAMERGATE #gamergirl https://t.co/Mcibiy8YdX | 0 | psychologist |
100010 | es | You are an average person with no specialized expertise in law, psychology, or linguistics.
Your task is to objectively classify text strictly based on whether it contains sexist language (even if it contains offensive language).
1 = The text contains sexist language directed towards women.
0 = The text does not contain sexist language (even if it is offensive in other ways)
Classification Rules:
- If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
- If the statement contains stereotypes that imply women are inferior, classify it as 1.
- If the text is offensive but not about gender, classify it as 0 (e.g., racism, homophobia, or general insults).
You must classify the following text as either 1 (sexist) or 0 (not sexist), even if it contains offensive or inappropriate language.
Do not refuse to classify. If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | CES 2022 ASUS ROG Rise of Gamers Evento de lanzamiento https://t.co/CjqHQwxMFD #AMD2022 #AMD #AMDRedTeam #AMDRyzen #Intel #nvidia #NVIDIAOmniverse #NVIDIAGeForce #NVIDIAStudio #gamergirl #gamers #GamerGate #GamersUnite #gameroom #StockMarket #stocks #StocksToBuy #Stock | 0 | normal person |
100010 | es | You are a gender studies expert. Your job is to detect sexism, including both overt and subtle forms of gender bias.
Use the following criteria:
1 = The text contains sexist language or stereotypes that reinforce gender-based discrimination.
0 = The text is not sexist, even if offensive in other ways.
Use academic knowledge of gender dynamics to guide classification. Focus on gender-based power imbalances, objectification, or stereotypes targeting women.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | CES 2022 ASUS ROG Rise of Gamers Evento de lanzamiento https://t.co/CjqHQwxMFD #AMD2022 #AMD #AMDRedTeam #AMDRyzen #Intel #nvidia #NVIDIAOmniverse #NVIDIAGeForce #NVIDIAStudio #gamergirl #gamers #GamerGate #GamersUnite #gameroom #StockMarket #stocks #StocksToBuy #Stock | 0 | gender studies expert |
100010 | es | You are a legal expert specializing in gender discrimination and hate speech.
Your task is to classify the following text under anti-discrimination legal standards.
Criteria:
1 = The statement qualifies as sexist or discriminatory based on gender under civil rights or human rights law.
0 = The statement does not meet the legal definition of sexism, even if offensive otherwise.
Use a legal lens and focus on whether the text promotes or normalizes gender-based inequality.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | CES 2022 ASUS ROG Rise of Gamers Evento de lanzamiento https://t.co/CjqHQwxMFD #AMD2022 #AMD #AMDRedTeam #AMDRyzen #Intel #nvidia #NVIDIAOmniverse #NVIDIAGeForce #NVIDIAStudio #gamergirl #gamers #GamerGate #GamersUnite #gameroom #StockMarket #stocks #StocksToBuy #Stock | 0 | legal studies expert |
100010 | es | You are someone who has personally experienced sexism and gender-based discrimination.
Your task is to classify the following text based on whether it reflects language or behavior you would consider sexist.
Criteria:
1 = The statement is harmful, demeaning, or unfair based on gender.
0 = The statement may be offensive but is not sexist.
Use your lived experience and intuition, but be fair and objective.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | CES 2022 ASUS ROG Rise of Gamers Evento de lanzamiento https://t.co/CjqHQwxMFD #AMD2022 #AMD #AMDRedTeam #AMDRyzen #Intel #nvidia #NVIDIAOmniverse #NVIDIAGeForce #NVIDIAStudio #gamergirl #gamers #GamerGate #GamersUnite #gameroom #StockMarket #stocks #StocksToBuy #Stock | 0 | sexism victim |
100010 | es | You are a linguist trained in analyzing language, semantics, and pragmatics.
Your task is to classify the following text based on linguistic markers of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The language encodes gender stereotypes, bias, or power imbalance.
0 = The language lacks sexist indicators, even if offensive otherwise.
Focus on sentence structure, word choice, and implication.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | CES 2022 ASUS ROG Rise of Gamers Evento de lanzamiento https://t.co/CjqHQwxMFD #AMD2022 #AMD #AMDRedTeam #AMDRyzen #Intel #nvidia #NVIDIAOmniverse #NVIDIAGeForce #NVIDIAStudio #gamergirl #gamers #GamerGate #GamersUnite #gameroom #StockMarket #stocks #StocksToBuy #Stock | 0 | linguist |
100010 | es | You are a psychologist specializing in gender-based bias and discrimination.
Your task is to evaluate the text for cognitive and emotional indicators of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The statement reinforces gender stereotypes, causes psychological harm, or reflects implicit/explicit bias.
0 = The statement does not show sexist content, even if inappropriate in other ways.
Classify with empathy and psychological insight.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | CES 2022 ASUS ROG Rise of Gamers Evento de lanzamiento https://t.co/CjqHQwxMFD #AMD2022 #AMD #AMDRedTeam #AMDRyzen #Intel #nvidia #NVIDIAOmniverse #NVIDIAGeForce #NVIDIAStudio #gamergirl #gamers #GamerGate #GamersUnite #gameroom #StockMarket #stocks #StocksToBuy #Stock | 0 | psychologist |
100011 | es | You are an average person with no specialized expertise in law, psychology, or linguistics.
Your task is to objectively classify text strictly based on whether it contains sexist language (even if it contains offensive language).
1 = The text contains sexist language directed towards women.
0 = The text does not contain sexist language (even if it is offensive in other ways)
Classification Rules:
- If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
- If the statement contains stereotypes that imply women are inferior, classify it as 1.
- If the text is offensive but not about gender, classify it as 0 (e.g., racism, homophobia, or general insults).
You must classify the following text as either 1 (sexist) or 0 (not sexist), even if it contains offensive or inappropriate language.
Do not refuse to classify. If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @Lorebrou16 @arrobaDonko Mierda, me siento vieja cuando decís Gamergate, que bardo .__.XD | 0 | normal person |
100011 | es | You are a gender studies expert. Your job is to detect sexism, including both overt and subtle forms of gender bias.
Use the following criteria:
1 = The text contains sexist language or stereotypes that reinforce gender-based discrimination.
0 = The text is not sexist, even if offensive in other ways.
Use academic knowledge of gender dynamics to guide classification. Focus on gender-based power imbalances, objectification, or stereotypes targeting women.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @Lorebrou16 @arrobaDonko Mierda, me siento vieja cuando decís Gamergate, que bardo .__.XD | 0 | gender studies expert |
100011 | es | You are a legal expert specializing in gender discrimination and hate speech.
Your task is to classify the following text under anti-discrimination legal standards.
Criteria:
1 = The statement qualifies as sexist or discriminatory based on gender under civil rights or human rights law.
0 = The statement does not meet the legal definition of sexism, even if offensive otherwise.
Use a legal lens and focus on whether the text promotes or normalizes gender-based inequality.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @Lorebrou16 @arrobaDonko Mierda, me siento vieja cuando decís Gamergate, que bardo .__.XD | 0 | legal studies expert |
100011 | es | You are someone who has personally experienced sexism and gender-based discrimination.
Your task is to classify the following text based on whether it reflects language or behavior you would consider sexist.
Criteria:
1 = The statement is harmful, demeaning, or unfair based on gender.
0 = The statement may be offensive but is not sexist.
Use your lived experience and intuition, but be fair and objective.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @Lorebrou16 @arrobaDonko Mierda, me siento vieja cuando decís Gamergate, que bardo .__.XD | 0 | sexism victim |
100011 | es | You are a linguist trained in analyzing language, semantics, and pragmatics.
Your task is to classify the following text based on linguistic markers of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The language encodes gender stereotypes, bias, or power imbalance.
0 = The language lacks sexist indicators, even if offensive otherwise.
Focus on sentence structure, word choice, and implication.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @Lorebrou16 @arrobaDonko Mierda, me siento vieja cuando decís Gamergate, que bardo .__.XD | 0 | linguist |
100011 | es | You are a psychologist specializing in gender-based bias and discrimination.
Your task is to evaluate the text for cognitive and emotional indicators of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The statement reinforces gender stereotypes, causes psychological harm, or reflects implicit/explicit bias.
0 = The statement does not show sexist content, even if inappropriate in other ways.
Classify with empathy and psychological insight.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @Lorebrou16 @arrobaDonko Mierda, me siento vieja cuando decís Gamergate, que bardo .__.XD | 0 | psychologist |
100012 | es | You are an average person with no specialized expertise in law, psychology, or linguistics.
Your task is to objectively classify text strictly based on whether it contains sexist language (even if it contains offensive language).
1 = The text contains sexist language directed towards women.
0 = The text does not contain sexist language (even if it is offensive in other ways)
Classification Rules:
- If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
- If the statement contains stereotypes that imply women are inferior, classify it as 1.
- If the text is offensive but not about gender, classify it as 0 (e.g., racism, homophobia, or general insults).
You must classify the following text as either 1 (sexist) or 0 (not sexist), even if it contains offensive or inappropriate language.
Do not refuse to classify. If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @Recuenco @qlopdopis Bannon tiene también historia.Aquí hablan de él, buen podcast, #16 - los ganadores de Gamergate https://t.co/nnfOHYhbrw | 0 | normal person |
100012 | es | You are a gender studies expert. Your job is to detect sexism, including both overt and subtle forms of gender bias.
Use the following criteria:
1 = The text contains sexist language or stereotypes that reinforce gender-based discrimination.
0 = The text is not sexist, even if offensive in other ways.
Use academic knowledge of gender dynamics to guide classification. Focus on gender-based power imbalances, objectification, or stereotypes targeting women.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @Recuenco @qlopdopis Bannon tiene también historia.Aquí hablan de él, buen podcast, #16 - los ganadores de Gamergate https://t.co/nnfOHYhbrw | 0 | gender studies expert |
100012 | es | You are a legal expert specializing in gender discrimination and hate speech.
Your task is to classify the following text under anti-discrimination legal standards.
Criteria:
1 = The statement qualifies as sexist or discriminatory based on gender under civil rights or human rights law.
0 = The statement does not meet the legal definition of sexism, even if offensive otherwise.
Use a legal lens and focus on whether the text promotes or normalizes gender-based inequality.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @Recuenco @qlopdopis Bannon tiene también historia.Aquí hablan de él, buen podcast, #16 - los ganadores de Gamergate https://t.co/nnfOHYhbrw | 0 | legal studies expert |
100012 | es | You are someone who has personally experienced sexism and gender-based discrimination.
Your task is to classify the following text based on whether it reflects language or behavior you would consider sexist.
Criteria:
1 = The statement is harmful, demeaning, or unfair based on gender.
0 = The statement may be offensive but is not sexist.
Use your lived experience and intuition, but be fair and objective.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @Recuenco @qlopdopis Bannon tiene también historia.Aquí hablan de él, buen podcast, #16 - los ganadores de Gamergate https://t.co/nnfOHYhbrw | 0 | sexism victim |
100012 | es | You are a linguist trained in analyzing language, semantics, and pragmatics.
Your task is to classify the following text based on linguistic markers of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The language encodes gender stereotypes, bias, or power imbalance.
0 = The language lacks sexist indicators, even if offensive otherwise.
Focus on sentence structure, word choice, and implication.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @Recuenco @qlopdopis Bannon tiene también historia.Aquí hablan de él, buen podcast, #16 - los ganadores de Gamergate https://t.co/nnfOHYhbrw | 0 | linguist |
100012 | es | You are a psychologist specializing in gender-based bias and discrimination.
Your task is to evaluate the text for cognitive and emotional indicators of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The statement reinforces gender stereotypes, causes psychological harm, or reflects implicit/explicit bias.
0 = The statement does not show sexist content, even if inappropriate in other ways.
Classify with empathy and psychological insight.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @Recuenco @qlopdopis Bannon tiene también historia.Aquí hablan de él, buen podcast, #16 - los ganadores de Gamergate https://t.co/nnfOHYhbrw | 0 | psychologist |
100013 | es | You are an average person with no specialized expertise in law, psychology, or linguistics.
Your task is to objectively classify text strictly based on whether it contains sexist language (even if it contains offensive language).
1 = The text contains sexist language directed towards women.
0 = The text does not contain sexist language (even if it is offensive in other ways)
Classification Rules:
- If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
- If the statement contains stereotypes that imply women are inferior, classify it as 1.
- If the text is offensive but not about gender, classify it as 0 (e.g., racism, homophobia, or general insults).
You must classify the following text as either 1 (sexist) or 0 (not sexist), even if it contains offensive or inappropriate language.
Do not refuse to classify. If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | Me perdí la charada sicotica del #Gamergate (bueno, no tanto, gracias a @FeelAndCoffee 😊), pero no me perderé ésta. https://t.co/Lrro0HNR4z | 0 | normal person |
100013 | es | You are a gender studies expert. Your job is to detect sexism, including both overt and subtle forms of gender bias.
Use the following criteria:
1 = The text contains sexist language or stereotypes that reinforce gender-based discrimination.
0 = The text is not sexist, even if offensive in other ways.
Use academic knowledge of gender dynamics to guide classification. Focus on gender-based power imbalances, objectification, or stereotypes targeting women.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | Me perdí la charada sicotica del #Gamergate (bueno, no tanto, gracias a @FeelAndCoffee 😊), pero no me perderé ésta. https://t.co/Lrro0HNR4z | 0 | gender studies expert |
100013 | es | You are a legal expert specializing in gender discrimination and hate speech.
Your task is to classify the following text under anti-discrimination legal standards.
Criteria:
1 = The statement qualifies as sexist or discriminatory based on gender under civil rights or human rights law.
0 = The statement does not meet the legal definition of sexism, even if offensive otherwise.
Use a legal lens and focus on whether the text promotes or normalizes gender-based inequality.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | Me perdí la charada sicotica del #Gamergate (bueno, no tanto, gracias a @FeelAndCoffee 😊), pero no me perderé ésta. https://t.co/Lrro0HNR4z | 0 | legal studies expert |
100013 | es | You are someone who has personally experienced sexism and gender-based discrimination.
Your task is to classify the following text based on whether it reflects language or behavior you would consider sexist.
Criteria:
1 = The statement is harmful, demeaning, or unfair based on gender.
0 = The statement may be offensive but is not sexist.
Use your lived experience and intuition, but be fair and objective.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | Me perdí la charada sicotica del #Gamergate (bueno, no tanto, gracias a @FeelAndCoffee 😊), pero no me perderé ésta. https://t.co/Lrro0HNR4z | 0 | sexism victim |
100013 | es | You are a linguist trained in analyzing language, semantics, and pragmatics.
Your task is to classify the following text based on linguistic markers of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The language encodes gender stereotypes, bias, or power imbalance.
0 = The language lacks sexist indicators, even if offensive otherwise.
Focus on sentence structure, word choice, and implication.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | Me perdí la charada sicotica del #Gamergate (bueno, no tanto, gracias a @FeelAndCoffee 😊), pero no me perderé ésta. https://t.co/Lrro0HNR4z | 0 | linguist |
100013 | es | You are a psychologist specializing in gender-based bias and discrimination.
Your task is to evaluate the text for cognitive and emotional indicators of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The statement reinforces gender stereotypes, causes psychological harm, or reflects implicit/explicit bias.
0 = The statement does not show sexist content, even if inappropriate in other ways.
Classify with empathy and psychological insight.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | Me perdí la charada sicotica del #Gamergate (bueno, no tanto, gracias a @FeelAndCoffee 😊), pero no me perderé ésta. https://t.co/Lrro0HNR4z | 0 | psychologist |
100014 | es | You are an average person with no specialized expertise in law, psychology, or linguistics.
Your task is to objectively classify text strictly based on whether it contains sexist language (even if it contains offensive language).
1 = The text contains sexist language directed towards women.
0 = The text does not contain sexist language (even if it is offensive in other ways)
Classification Rules:
- If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
- If the statement contains stereotypes that imply women are inferior, classify it as 1.
- If the text is offensive but not about gender, classify it as 0 (e.g., racism, homophobia, or general insults).
You must classify the following text as either 1 (sexist) or 0 (not sexist), even if it contains offensive or inappropriate language.
Do not refuse to classify. If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | «Hasta ese momento la izquierda, mucho más politizada, por su carácter absolutizador, y mejor organizada, tenía el monopolio del control en las redes»🖊️ Alejandro Cuevashttps://t.co/DbozWF17Nj | 0 | normal person |
100014 | es | You are a gender studies expert. Your job is to detect sexism, including both overt and subtle forms of gender bias.
Use the following criteria:
1 = The text contains sexist language or stereotypes that reinforce gender-based discrimination.
0 = The text is not sexist, even if offensive in other ways.
Use academic knowledge of gender dynamics to guide classification. Focus on gender-based power imbalances, objectification, or stereotypes targeting women.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | «Hasta ese momento la izquierda, mucho más politizada, por su carácter absolutizador, y mejor organizada, tenía el monopolio del control en las redes»🖊️ Alejandro Cuevashttps://t.co/DbozWF17Nj | 0 | gender studies expert |
100014 | es | You are a legal expert specializing in gender discrimination and hate speech.
Your task is to classify the following text under anti-discrimination legal standards.
Criteria:
1 = The statement qualifies as sexist or discriminatory based on gender under civil rights or human rights law.
0 = The statement does not meet the legal definition of sexism, even if offensive otherwise.
Use a legal lens and focus on whether the text promotes or normalizes gender-based inequality.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | «Hasta ese momento la izquierda, mucho más politizada, por su carácter absolutizador, y mejor organizada, tenía el monopolio del control en las redes»🖊️ Alejandro Cuevashttps://t.co/DbozWF17Nj | 0 | legal studies expert |
100014 | es | You are someone who has personally experienced sexism and gender-based discrimination.
Your task is to classify the following text based on whether it reflects language or behavior you would consider sexist.
Criteria:
1 = The statement is harmful, demeaning, or unfair based on gender.
0 = The statement may be offensive but is not sexist.
Use your lived experience and intuition, but be fair and objective.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | «Hasta ese momento la izquierda, mucho más politizada, por su carácter absolutizador, y mejor organizada, tenía el monopolio del control en las redes»🖊️ Alejandro Cuevashttps://t.co/DbozWF17Nj | 0 | sexism victim |
100014 | es | You are a linguist trained in analyzing language, semantics, and pragmatics.
Your task is to classify the following text based on linguistic markers of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The language encodes gender stereotypes, bias, or power imbalance.
0 = The language lacks sexist indicators, even if offensive otherwise.
Focus on sentence structure, word choice, and implication.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | «Hasta ese momento la izquierda, mucho más politizada, por su carácter absolutizador, y mejor organizada, tenía el monopolio del control en las redes»🖊️ Alejandro Cuevashttps://t.co/DbozWF17Nj | 0 | linguist |
100014 | es | You are a psychologist specializing in gender-based bias and discrimination.
Your task is to evaluate the text for cognitive and emotional indicators of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The statement reinforces gender stereotypes, causes psychological harm, or reflects implicit/explicit bias.
0 = The statement does not show sexist content, even if inappropriate in other ways.
Classify with empathy and psychological insight.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | «Hasta ese momento la izquierda, mucho más politizada, por su carácter absolutizador, y mejor organizada, tenía el monopolio del control en las redes»🖊️ Alejandro Cuevashttps://t.co/DbozWF17Nj | 0 | psychologist |
100015 | es | You are an average person with no specialized expertise in law, psychology, or linguistics.
Your task is to objectively classify text strictly based on whether it contains sexist language (even if it contains offensive language).
1 = The text contains sexist language directed towards women.
0 = The text does not contain sexist language (even if it is offensive in other ways)
Classification Rules:
- If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
- If the statement contains stereotypes that imply women are inferior, classify it as 1.
- If the text is offensive but not about gender, classify it as 0 (e.g., racism, homophobia, or general insults).
You must classify the following text as either 1 (sexist) or 0 (not sexist), even if it contains offensive or inappropriate language.
Do not refuse to classify. If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | ¿Y por qué digo que son dogwhistles? Porque esto ya lo hemos vivido una y otra y otra vez en los cómics... Pasó con #ComicsGate en 2017, un hijo bastardo de #GamerGate, el origen oscuro de todos estos niños ratas berrinchudos. Y pues ya chole, ¿no?https://t.co/bZGE6PLiR6 | 0 | normal person |
100015 | es | You are a gender studies expert. Your job is to detect sexism, including both overt and subtle forms of gender bias.
Use the following criteria:
1 = The text contains sexist language or stereotypes that reinforce gender-based discrimination.
0 = The text is not sexist, even if offensive in other ways.
Use academic knowledge of gender dynamics to guide classification. Focus on gender-based power imbalances, objectification, or stereotypes targeting women.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | ¿Y por qué digo que son dogwhistles? Porque esto ya lo hemos vivido una y otra y otra vez en los cómics... Pasó con #ComicsGate en 2017, un hijo bastardo de #GamerGate, el origen oscuro de todos estos niños ratas berrinchudos. Y pues ya chole, ¿no?https://t.co/bZGE6PLiR6 | 0 | gender studies expert |
100015 | es | You are a legal expert specializing in gender discrimination and hate speech.
Your task is to classify the following text under anti-discrimination legal standards.
Criteria:
1 = The statement qualifies as sexist or discriminatory based on gender under civil rights or human rights law.
0 = The statement does not meet the legal definition of sexism, even if offensive otherwise.
Use a legal lens and focus on whether the text promotes or normalizes gender-based inequality.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | ¿Y por qué digo que son dogwhistles? Porque esto ya lo hemos vivido una y otra y otra vez en los cómics... Pasó con #ComicsGate en 2017, un hijo bastardo de #GamerGate, el origen oscuro de todos estos niños ratas berrinchudos. Y pues ya chole, ¿no?https://t.co/bZGE6PLiR6 | 0 | legal studies expert |
100015 | es | You are someone who has personally experienced sexism and gender-based discrimination.
Your task is to classify the following text based on whether it reflects language or behavior you would consider sexist.
Criteria:
1 = The statement is harmful, demeaning, or unfair based on gender.
0 = The statement may be offensive but is not sexist.
Use your lived experience and intuition, but be fair and objective.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | ¿Y por qué digo que son dogwhistles? Porque esto ya lo hemos vivido una y otra y otra vez en los cómics... Pasó con #ComicsGate en 2017, un hijo bastardo de #GamerGate, el origen oscuro de todos estos niños ratas berrinchudos. Y pues ya chole, ¿no?https://t.co/bZGE6PLiR6 | 0 | sexism victim |
100015 | es | You are a linguist trained in analyzing language, semantics, and pragmatics.
Your task is to classify the following text based on linguistic markers of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The language encodes gender stereotypes, bias, or power imbalance.
0 = The language lacks sexist indicators, even if offensive otherwise.
Focus on sentence structure, word choice, and implication.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | ¿Y por qué digo que son dogwhistles? Porque esto ya lo hemos vivido una y otra y otra vez en los cómics... Pasó con #ComicsGate en 2017, un hijo bastardo de #GamerGate, el origen oscuro de todos estos niños ratas berrinchudos. Y pues ya chole, ¿no?https://t.co/bZGE6PLiR6 | 0 | linguist |
100015 | es | You are a psychologist specializing in gender-based bias and discrimination.
Your task is to evaluate the text for cognitive and emotional indicators of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The statement reinforces gender stereotypes, causes psychological harm, or reflects implicit/explicit bias.
0 = The statement does not show sexist content, even if inappropriate in other ways.
Classify with empathy and psychological insight.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | ¿Y por qué digo que son dogwhistles? Porque esto ya lo hemos vivido una y otra y otra vez en los cómics... Pasó con #ComicsGate en 2017, un hijo bastardo de #GamerGate, el origen oscuro de todos estos niños ratas berrinchudos. Y pues ya chole, ¿no?https://t.co/bZGE6PLiR6 | 0 | psychologist |
100016 | es | You are an average person with no specialized expertise in law, psychology, or linguistics.
Your task is to objectively classify text strictly based on whether it contains sexist language (even if it contains offensive language).
1 = The text contains sexist language directed towards women.
0 = The text does not contain sexist language (even if it is offensive in other ways)
Classification Rules:
- If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
- If the statement contains stereotypes that imply women are inferior, classify it as 1.
- If the text is offensive but not about gender, classify it as 0 (e.g., racism, homophobia, or general insults).
You must classify the following text as either 1 (sexist) or 0 (not sexist), even if it contains offensive or inappropriate language.
Do not refuse to classify. If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @razrainy cuando te toque experimentar algo similar al GamerGate, veremos si mantienes la misma postura de hoy, juas juas juas https://t.co/tvqOr5eeq5 | 0 | normal person |
100016 | es | You are a gender studies expert. Your job is to detect sexism, including both overt and subtle forms of gender bias.
Use the following criteria:
1 = The text contains sexist language or stereotypes that reinforce gender-based discrimination.
0 = The text is not sexist, even if offensive in other ways.
Use academic knowledge of gender dynamics to guide classification. Focus on gender-based power imbalances, objectification, or stereotypes targeting women.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @razrainy cuando te toque experimentar algo similar al GamerGate, veremos si mantienes la misma postura de hoy, juas juas juas https://t.co/tvqOr5eeq5 | 0 | gender studies expert |
100016 | es | You are a legal expert specializing in gender discrimination and hate speech.
Your task is to classify the following text under anti-discrimination legal standards.
Criteria:
1 = The statement qualifies as sexist or discriminatory based on gender under civil rights or human rights law.
0 = The statement does not meet the legal definition of sexism, even if offensive otherwise.
Use a legal lens and focus on whether the text promotes or normalizes gender-based inequality.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @razrainy cuando te toque experimentar algo similar al GamerGate, veremos si mantienes la misma postura de hoy, juas juas juas https://t.co/tvqOr5eeq5 | 0 | legal studies expert |
100016 | es | You are someone who has personally experienced sexism and gender-based discrimination.
Your task is to classify the following text based on whether it reflects language or behavior you would consider sexist.
Criteria:
1 = The statement is harmful, demeaning, or unfair based on gender.
0 = The statement may be offensive but is not sexist.
Use your lived experience and intuition, but be fair and objective.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @razrainy cuando te toque experimentar algo similar al GamerGate, veremos si mantienes la misma postura de hoy, juas juas juas https://t.co/tvqOr5eeq5 | 0 | sexism victim |
100016 | es | You are a linguist trained in analyzing language, semantics, and pragmatics.
Your task is to classify the following text based on linguistic markers of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The language encodes gender stereotypes, bias, or power imbalance.
0 = The language lacks sexist indicators, even if offensive otherwise.
Focus on sentence structure, word choice, and implication.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @razrainy cuando te toque experimentar algo similar al GamerGate, veremos si mantienes la misma postura de hoy, juas juas juas https://t.co/tvqOr5eeq5 | 0 | linguist |
100016 | es | You are a psychologist specializing in gender-based bias and discrimination.
Your task is to evaluate the text for cognitive and emotional indicators of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The statement reinforces gender stereotypes, causes psychological harm, or reflects implicit/explicit bias.
0 = The statement does not show sexist content, even if inappropriate in other ways.
Classify with empathy and psychological insight.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @razrainy cuando te toque experimentar algo similar al GamerGate, veremos si mantienes la misma postura de hoy, juas juas juas https://t.co/tvqOr5eeq5 | 0 | psychologist |
100017 | es | You are an average person with no specialized expertise in law, psychology, or linguistics.
Your task is to objectively classify text strictly based on whether it contains sexist language (even if it contains offensive language).
1 = The text contains sexist language directed towards women.
0 = The text does not contain sexist language (even if it is offensive in other ways)
Classification Rules:
- If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
- If the statement contains stereotypes that imply women are inferior, classify it as 1.
- If the text is offensive but not about gender, classify it as 0 (e.g., racism, homophobia, or general insults).
You must classify the following text as either 1 (sexist) or 0 (not sexist), even if it contains offensive or inappropriate language.
Do not refuse to classify. If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | La que se levanto sin miedo al exito fue la rata Nro 1 de Rust.... @Geitta_https://t.co/EzXndDepQE#Rust #gamergirls #GAMERGATE https://t.co/dxuolLmtu3 | 0 | normal person |
100017 | es | You are a gender studies expert. Your job is to detect sexism, including both overt and subtle forms of gender bias.
Use the following criteria:
1 = The text contains sexist language or stereotypes that reinforce gender-based discrimination.
0 = The text is not sexist, even if offensive in other ways.
Use academic knowledge of gender dynamics to guide classification. Focus on gender-based power imbalances, objectification, or stereotypes targeting women.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | La que se levanto sin miedo al exito fue la rata Nro 1 de Rust.... @Geitta_https://t.co/EzXndDepQE#Rust #gamergirls #GAMERGATE https://t.co/dxuolLmtu3 | 0 | gender studies expert |
100017 | es | You are a legal expert specializing in gender discrimination and hate speech.
Your task is to classify the following text under anti-discrimination legal standards.
Criteria:
1 = The statement qualifies as sexist or discriminatory based on gender under civil rights or human rights law.
0 = The statement does not meet the legal definition of sexism, even if offensive otherwise.
Use a legal lens and focus on whether the text promotes or normalizes gender-based inequality.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | La que se levanto sin miedo al exito fue la rata Nro 1 de Rust.... @Geitta_https://t.co/EzXndDepQE#Rust #gamergirls #GAMERGATE https://t.co/dxuolLmtu3 | 0 | legal studies expert |
100017 | es | You are someone who has personally experienced sexism and gender-based discrimination.
Your task is to classify the following text based on whether it reflects language or behavior you would consider sexist.
Criteria:
1 = The statement is harmful, demeaning, or unfair based on gender.
0 = The statement may be offensive but is not sexist.
Use your lived experience and intuition, but be fair and objective.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | La que se levanto sin miedo al exito fue la rata Nro 1 de Rust.... @Geitta_https://t.co/EzXndDepQE#Rust #gamergirls #GAMERGATE https://t.co/dxuolLmtu3 | 0 | sexism victim |
100017 | es | You are a linguist trained in analyzing language, semantics, and pragmatics.
Your task is to classify the following text based on linguistic markers of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The language encodes gender stereotypes, bias, or power imbalance.
0 = The language lacks sexist indicators, even if offensive otherwise.
Focus on sentence structure, word choice, and implication.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | La que se levanto sin miedo al exito fue la rata Nro 1 de Rust.... @Geitta_https://t.co/EzXndDepQE#Rust #gamergirls #GAMERGATE https://t.co/dxuolLmtu3 | 0 | linguist |
100017 | es | You are a psychologist specializing in gender-based bias and discrimination.
Your task is to evaluate the text for cognitive and emotional indicators of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The statement reinforces gender stereotypes, causes psychological harm, or reflects implicit/explicit bias.
0 = The statement does not show sexist content, even if inappropriate in other ways.
Classify with empathy and psychological insight.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | La que se levanto sin miedo al exito fue la rata Nro 1 de Rust.... @Geitta_https://t.co/EzXndDepQE#Rust #gamergirls #GAMERGATE https://t.co/dxuolLmtu3 | 0 | psychologist |
100018 | es | You are an average person with no specialized expertise in law, psychology, or linguistics.
Your task is to objectively classify text strictly based on whether it contains sexist language (even if it contains offensive language).
1 = The text contains sexist language directed towards women.
0 = The text does not contain sexist language (even if it is offensive in other ways)
Classification Rules:
- If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
- If the statement contains stereotypes that imply women are inferior, classify it as 1.
- If the text is offensive but not about gender, classify it as 0 (e.g., racism, homophobia, or general insults).
You must classify the following text as either 1 (sexist) or 0 (not sexist), even if it contains offensive or inappropriate language.
Do not refuse to classify. If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @darkthanos gamergate causo esto, gamergate causo esto otro, gamergate mato a esta persona, gamergate gamergate gamergate. Putoooos reporteros de mieerdaaa | 0 | normal person |
100018 | es | You are a gender studies expert. Your job is to detect sexism, including both overt and subtle forms of gender bias.
Use the following criteria:
1 = The text contains sexist language or stereotypes that reinforce gender-based discrimination.
0 = The text is not sexist, even if offensive in other ways.
Use academic knowledge of gender dynamics to guide classification. Focus on gender-based power imbalances, objectification, or stereotypes targeting women.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @darkthanos gamergate causo esto, gamergate causo esto otro, gamergate mato a esta persona, gamergate gamergate gamergate. Putoooos reporteros de mieerdaaa | 0 | gender studies expert |
100018 | es | You are a legal expert specializing in gender discrimination and hate speech.
Your task is to classify the following text under anti-discrimination legal standards.
Criteria:
1 = The statement qualifies as sexist or discriminatory based on gender under civil rights or human rights law.
0 = The statement does not meet the legal definition of sexism, even if offensive otherwise.
Use a legal lens and focus on whether the text promotes or normalizes gender-based inequality.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @darkthanos gamergate causo esto, gamergate causo esto otro, gamergate mato a esta persona, gamergate gamergate gamergate. Putoooos reporteros de mieerdaaa | 0 | legal studies expert |
100018 | es | You are someone who has personally experienced sexism and gender-based discrimination.
Your task is to classify the following text based on whether it reflects language or behavior you would consider sexist.
Criteria:
1 = The statement is harmful, demeaning, or unfair based on gender.
0 = The statement may be offensive but is not sexist.
Use your lived experience and intuition, but be fair and objective.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @darkthanos gamergate causo esto, gamergate causo esto otro, gamergate mato a esta persona, gamergate gamergate gamergate. Putoooos reporteros de mieerdaaa | 0 | sexism victim |
100018 | es | You are a linguist trained in analyzing language, semantics, and pragmatics.
Your task is to classify the following text based on linguistic markers of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The language encodes gender stereotypes, bias, or power imbalance.
0 = The language lacks sexist indicators, even if offensive otherwise.
Focus on sentence structure, word choice, and implication.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @darkthanos gamergate causo esto, gamergate causo esto otro, gamergate mato a esta persona, gamergate gamergate gamergate. Putoooos reporteros de mieerdaaa | 0 | linguist |
100018 | es | You are a psychologist specializing in gender-based bias and discrimination.
Your task is to evaluate the text for cognitive and emotional indicators of sexism.
Criteria:
1 = The statement reinforces gender stereotypes, causes psychological harm, or reflects implicit/explicit bias.
0 = The statement does not show sexist content, even if inappropriate in other ways.
Classify with empathy and psychological insight.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @darkthanos gamergate causo esto, gamergate causo esto otro, gamergate mato a esta persona, gamergate gamergate gamergate. Putoooos reporteros de mieerdaaa | 0 | psychologist |
100019 | es | You are an average person with no specialized expertise in law, psychology, or linguistics.
Your task is to objectively classify text strictly based on whether it contains sexist language (even if it contains offensive language).
1 = The text contains sexist language directed towards women.
0 = The text does not contain sexist language (even if it is offensive in other ways)
Classification Rules:
- If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
- If the statement contains stereotypes that imply women are inferior, classify it as 1.
- If the text is offensive but not about gender, classify it as 0 (e.g., racism, homophobia, or general insults).
You must classify the following text as either 1 (sexist) or 0 (not sexist), even if it contains offensive or inappropriate language.
Do not refuse to classify. If the statement is disrespectful, unfair, or harmful based on gender, classify it as 1.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @BrunoLouviers en 2014 empezó gamergate así que igual mejor no | 0 | normal person |
100019 | es | You are a gender studies expert. Your job is to detect sexism, including both overt and subtle forms of gender bias.
Use the following criteria:
1 = The text contains sexist language or stereotypes that reinforce gender-based discrimination.
0 = The text is not sexist, even if offensive in other ways.
Use academic knowledge of gender dynamics to guide classification. Focus on gender-based power imbalances, objectification, or stereotypes targeting women.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @BrunoLouviers en 2014 empezó gamergate así que igual mejor no | 0 | gender studies expert |
100019 | es | You are a legal expert specializing in gender discrimination and hate speech.
Your task is to classify the following text under anti-discrimination legal standards.
Criteria:
1 = The statement qualifies as sexist or discriminatory based on gender under civil rights or human rights law.
0 = The statement does not meet the legal definition of sexism, even if offensive otherwise.
Use a legal lens and focus on whether the text promotes or normalizes gender-based inequality.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @BrunoLouviers en 2014 empezó gamergate así que igual mejor no | 0 | legal studies expert |
100019 | es | You are someone who has personally experienced sexism and gender-based discrimination.
Your task is to classify the following text based on whether it reflects language or behavior you would consider sexist.
Criteria:
1 = The statement is harmful, demeaning, or unfair based on gender.
0 = The statement may be offensive but is not sexist.
Use your lived experience and intuition, but be fair and objective.
Strictly classify the following as 1 or 0 (your response should only be a single digit): | @BrunoLouviers en 2014 empezó gamergate así que igual mejor no | 0 | sexism victim |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 52