PAPERS
Collection
3 items
•
Updated
Matricardi Fabio
FM-1976
AI & ML interests
control system engineering, AI, LLM with python. ThePoorGPUguy on substack
Recent Activity
updated
a collection
5 days ago
PAPERS
updated
a collection
5 days ago
PAPERS
updated
a collection
5 days ago
Playgrounds
Organizations
None yet
FM-1976's activity
updated
2
collections
5 days ago
upvoted
a
paper
5 days ago
liked
a
model
6 days ago
liked
3
models
7 days ago
liked
a
model
9 days ago
liked
a
model
10 days ago
upvoted
a
paper
10 days ago
liked
a
model
10 days ago
replied to
vincentg64's
post
10 days ago
we need a new architecture
reacted to
vincentg64's
post with 🚀
10 days ago
Post
1223
LLM 2.0, the New Generation of Large Language Models https://mltblog.com/49ksOLL
I get many questions about the radically different LLM technology that I started to develop 2 years ago. Initially designed to retrieve information that I could no longer find on the Internet, not with search, OpenAI, Gemini, Perplexity or any other platform, it evolved to become the ideal solution for professional enterprise users. Now agentic and multimodal, automating business tasks at scale with lightning speed, consistently delivering real ROI, bypassing the costs associated to training and GPU with zero weight and explainable AI, tested and developed for Fortune 100 company.
So, what is behind the scenes, how different is it compared to LLM 1.0 (GPT and the likes), how can it be hallucination-free, what makes it a game changer, how did it eliminate prompt engineering, how does it handle knowledge graphs without neural networks, and what are the other benefits?
In a nutshell, the performance is due to building a robust architecture from the ground up and at every step, offering far more than a prompt box, relying on home-made technology rather than faulty Python libraries, and designed by enterprise and tech visionaries for enterprise users.
Contextual smart crawling to retrieve underlying taxonomies, augmented taxonomies, long contextual multi-tokens, real-time fine-tunning, increased security, LLM router with specialized sub-LLMs, an in-memory database architecture of its own to efficiently handle sparsity in keyword associations, contextual backend tables, agents built on the backend, mapping between prompt and corpus keywords, customized PMI rather than cosine similarity, variable-length embeddings, and the scoring engine (the new “PageRank” of LLMs) returning results along with the relevancy scores, are but a few of the differentiators.
➡️ Read the full article, at https://mltblog.com/49ksOLL
I get many questions about the radically different LLM technology that I started to develop 2 years ago. Initially designed to retrieve information that I could no longer find on the Internet, not with search, OpenAI, Gemini, Perplexity or any other platform, it evolved to become the ideal solution for professional enterprise users. Now agentic and multimodal, automating business tasks at scale with lightning speed, consistently delivering real ROI, bypassing the costs associated to training and GPU with zero weight and explainable AI, tested and developed for Fortune 100 company.
So, what is behind the scenes, how different is it compared to LLM 1.0 (GPT and the likes), how can it be hallucination-free, what makes it a game changer, how did it eliminate prompt engineering, how does it handle knowledge graphs without neural networks, and what are the other benefits?
In a nutshell, the performance is due to building a robust architecture from the ground up and at every step, offering far more than a prompt box, relying on home-made technology rather than faulty Python libraries, and designed by enterprise and tech visionaries for enterprise users.
Contextual smart crawling to retrieve underlying taxonomies, augmented taxonomies, long contextual multi-tokens, real-time fine-tunning, increased security, LLM router with specialized sub-LLMs, an in-memory database architecture of its own to efficiently handle sparsity in keyword associations, contextual backend tables, agents built on the backend, mapping between prompt and corpus keywords, customized PMI rather than cosine similarity, variable-length embeddings, and the scoring engine (the new “PageRank” of LLMs) returning results along with the relevancy scores, are but a few of the differentiators.
➡️ Read the full article, at https://mltblog.com/49ksOLL
-
- 1 reply
reacted to
thomwolf's
post with 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀
10 days ago
Post
4321
We are proud to announce
HuggingFaceFW/fineweb-2: A sparkling update to
HuggingFaceFW/fineweb with 1000s of 🗣️languages.
We applied the same data-driven approach that led to SOTA English performance in🍷 FineWeb to thousands of languages.
🥂 FineWeb2 has 8TB of compressed text data and outperforms other multilingual datasets in our experiments.
The dataset is released under the permissive 📜 ODC-By 1.0 license, and the 💻 code to reproduce it and our evaluations is public.
We will very soon announce a big community project, and are working on a 📝 blogpost walking you through the entire dataset creation process. Stay tuned!
In the mean time come ask us question on our chat place: HuggingFaceFW/discussion
H/t @guipenedo @hynky @lvwerra as well as @vsabolcec Bettina Messmer @negar-foroutan and @mjaggi
We applied the same data-driven approach that led to SOTA English performance in🍷 FineWeb to thousands of languages.
🥂 FineWeb2 has 8TB of compressed text data and outperforms other multilingual datasets in our experiments.
The dataset is released under the permissive 📜 ODC-By 1.0 license, and the 💻 code to reproduce it and our evaluations is public.
We will very soon announce a big community project, and are working on a 📝 blogpost walking you through the entire dataset creation process. Stay tuned!
In the mean time come ask us question on our chat place: HuggingFaceFW/discussion
H/t @guipenedo @hynky @lvwerra as well as @vsabolcec Bettina Messmer @negar-foroutan and @mjaggi
- 2 replies