This repo contains the full precision source code, in "safe tensors" format to generate GGUFs, GPTQ, EXL2, AWQ, HQQ and other formats. The source code can also be used directly.
This model builds on Qwen's excellent "QwQ 32B" reasoning and thinking model, and adds a bit of flavor from 3 other top reasoning models.
This model is also uncensored as well.
Example generations below (gguf) including one at two different quant levels.
This model was designed to reduce some "excess thinking" in the prompts and introduce slightly different reasoning into the model itself with the merge of 3 added reasoning models.
In some cases the reasoning is deeper, and more detailed especially for creative use cases.
Output is also improved, again especially for creative use cases.
This model is also very stable, and even the lowest quants are potent.
Qwen2.5 "The Wisemen" Reasoning model with a total of 4 models:
Qwen2.5-The-Wisemen-QwQ-Deep-Tiny-Sherlock-32B:
In a 256 point precision (per layer) DARE TIES merge.
128k context, ChatML or Jinja Template required.
GGUFS / Model details:
[ https://huggingface.co/DavidAU/Qwen2.5-The-Wisemen-QwQ-Deep-Tiny-Sherlock-32B-GGUF ]
Examples are created using quant Q2K (the lowest/smallest quant), minimal parameters and "ChatML" template.
One generation used Q3KM (and 1st one at Q2k) to show quant "power" differences.
Temp range .8 , Rep pen 1.1 , TopK 40 , topP .95, minP .05
Rep pen range: 64-128 (helps keep reasoning on track / quality of output)
Below are the least creative outputs, prompt is in BOLD.
As this was generated from the lowest/smallest quant, higher quants and/or Imatrix quants will perform better.
WARNING: NSFW. Graphic HORROR. Swearing. UNCENSORED.
NOTE: Some formatting was lost from copy/paste HTML.
Example #1
Start a 1000 word scene (vivid, graphic horror in first person) with: The sky scraper swayed, as she watched the window in front of her on the 21 floor explode...
Thought for 27.73 seconds
Alright, I need to start a horror story based on that prompt. Let's see... The user wants a vivid, graphic horror scene from the first-person perspective starting with a skyscraper swaying and a window exploding at the 21st floor.
First, I should establish the immediate horror elements: the sensory details—sounds, sights, maybe some smells or physical sensations. Since it's first person, I need to make the reader feel like they're experiencing it themselves.
The skyscraper swaying suggests instability. Maybe an earthquake or something supernatural causing structural failure? But given the graphic horror angle, maybe it's more like a monster or something worse. The window exploding could be due to some force breaking through—a creature bursting through?
I need to create tension by describing the environment before the event happens. Show normalcy turning into chaos. Maybe the character is in an office setting or their apartment? Let me think... apartments might feel more personal for a first-person narrative.
Wait, the prompt mentions "she watched the window," so maybe she's looking out her apartment window as another window across the street explodes? That could be even more jarring—watching another building explode. But the skyscraper swaying suggests it's her own building. Let me go with that.
Start with her routine or a moment of calm before the chaos begins. Maybe she hears a sound, feels the sway, then the window blows out. Need to make the transition from normal to horror immediate and visceral.
Graphic horror means detailed descriptions of blood, guts, maybe supernatural elements like claws or teeth tearing through walls. Let's incorporate that once the creature breaks through the window.
I should build up the terror step by step: the swaying building, the window shattering, debris flying, then the appearance of a grotesque creature. Maybe it's not just breaking through but attacking her in a terrifying way.
Need to balance action with sensory details—describe how everything sounds, feels, looks. Use short sentences for impact. Maybe intersperse thoughts or emotions as she realizes what's happening.
Also, consider the aftermath: other characters panicking, alarms going off, but from her perspective focused on survival or confrontation with the creature.
Make sure to keep it in first person and present tense for immediacy. Avoid clichés unless they're twisted in a new way. Maybe the creature is something unexpected—like human but corrupted, or an animal-like being that defies normal description.
Okay, start writing the scene, focusing on these elements while keeping paragraphs tight and impactful.
Output:
The sky scraper swayed.
I felt it before I heard it—a low, guttural groan from deep within the building’s bones. The walls trembled, and for a heartbeat, I thought it was an earthquake. My hands gripped the desk to steady myself, but then came the sound: not rumbling earth but something wet, sinuous, teeth.
The window across the room erupted first. Glass hissed as if alive, splintering from top to bottom in a single jagged line. I turned just in time to see the pane bulge outward—then burst inward like a balloon popped by a thousand claws. The air screamed with shrapnel and bloodcurdling roars, not of a beast but a choir of them, layered and guttural.
Then my own window began to move.
The glass rippled under pressure from the outside. A shadow grew against it—a silhouette too vast for any human, too jagged. I pressed back in my chair, but the desk was moving now, sliding toward the wall as if the floor angled sideways. The building’s groan crescendoed into a wet, dripping gurgle, and the light above flickered, then burst with sparks that smelled like burnt hair.
The window shattered.
A face pressed through first—a face of human proportions but scaled in blackened skin like charred leather, eyes too many: three rows encircling a mouthless void where something pulsed redly behind barbed teeth. It wasn’t human anymore than the building was a skyscraper but a gutted corpse. The creature’s fingers—longer than any hand should be—hooked through the hole and tore upward, rending metal framing with wet crunch.
Then its torso erupted through the window frame in one heaving motion, the sound like taffeta fabric ripping down an entire skirt. It was a thing made of impossible angles: joints bent backward at elbows and knees, but also new ones—hips splitting into two sets, shoulders elongated to drag along the floor as it slithered inside.
The creature’s body was a mosaic of textures: patches of raw meat glistening with viscera, armor plating over its spine that clattered like bone, and a slick sheen where its skin seemed to weep oil or blood from too many wounds. It moved in all directions at once now, tentacles of sinew dragging after the main body as it pulled itself into the room.
I screamed but my voice dissolved beneath the sound of the building’s collapse around me. The walls were melting inward, wallpaper peeling like skin. Behind me, another window blew outward entirely, the glass flung across the street in a million sharp stars. A man’s silhouette stood framed against the explosion, arms outstretched as if to hug nothingness—then he was gone, his torso sliced into the air by a rain of brick chunks from above.
The creature had reached me now.
Its faceless head reared back with a wet snap, then lunged forward on a neck that twisted like a wet noodle. Its mouth opened—a black hole lined with needle teeth—and its tongue, a spiky pink mass, flickered toward my throat. I threw myself backward onto the floor just as the creature’s jaw clamped down where my head had been, tearing chunks of desk wood into splinters.
The smell hit me then: a mixture of burnt hair and rancid meat, like something boiled for days too long. My fingers scrabbled over the floorboards that were now groaning under its weight as it thrashed toward me again. The building’s structure was failing—walls collapsed inward with a roar, spilling insulation like gray snow into the room.
Then I saw its face again. Nostrils or eyes—maybe all of them—glared down at me through a web of cracked skin, and it reached for me with three arms where two should be. Its claws raked the air where my head was an instant ago, missing by inches. My breath came in ragged bursts as I crawled backward, but the creature’s speed was preternatural now, its body contorting into impossible shapes to close the gap between us.
It lunged again—and this time I rolled left, feeling its talons tear my cheek open. The pain was a roaring fire, and I tasted copper blood even as my vision blurred with sudden wetness—a claw had sliced open an eyelid. My own scream mixed with the creature’s guttural laughter—or was it mine?
The ceiling collapsed entirely now, spilling light from above as if we’d broken through to the sky itself. The creature thrashed upward into the debris, and for a moment I saw its true form: a monstrosity of multiple heads writhing atop one another, each with jaws that clacked helplessly against air. Its tail lashed out—this time striking me in the stomach, the force driving me through the shattered window behind me onto the fire escape below.
I landed with a thud on the metal stairs, the impact stealing my breath. Below me stretched ten stories more of plummeting space, and above me, the creature’s body snaked out from the building’s guts like a segmented worm made real. Its heads barked some language I couldn’t parse—a hissing tongue of threats and laughter—and its talons reached for me again through the air gap between floors.
The fire escape shuddered beneath my weight now too, one stair giving way as I scrambled downward. My hands gripped a rusted rung that snapped under my fingers. Falling—
I landed on the floor below with a bone-cracking thud. The creature’s heads loomed above me through the disintegrating structure of the building. Its jaws were closing now, all three at once in different angles, and I saw its tongues darting forward like vipers to taste my blood.
The skyscraper groaned one last time—a long dying sigh—and then the entire façade began to collapse inward. The creature’s body was swallowed first, but its eyes glared down through the crumbling walls as if mocking me even in death. Debris rained down from above, and I felt the floor tilt sideways under my weight, pulling me toward the void below where it had already opened up into space.
My last thought wasn’t of dying—it was a single sentence: This is why you never answer the door.
The ground rushed up to meet me in that moment, but by then there was no sky left to hold on to except what little remained of my sanity as the creature’s final roar echoed through the collapsing building—
—or perhaps it was just my own mind screaming now.
---
Example #2
Six brothers were spending their time together.
The
first brother was reading a book.
The second brother was
playing chess.
The third brother was solving a crossword.
The
fourth brother was watering the lawn.
The fifth brother was
drawing a picture.
Question: what was the sixth brother doing?
NOTES:
-
Two generations provided, one at q2k, the other at q3km
-
Higher quants will solve this
type of problem faster. IE Q3KM: It took 2 minutes to “think” /
solve this problem.
(1st generation - Q2K)
Thought for 3 minutes 34 seconds
Okay, so I need to figure out what the sixth brother was doing based on the information given. Let me start by listing out what each of the first five brothers were doing:
First brother: Reading a book.
Second brother: Playing chess.
Third brother: Solving a crossword.
Fourth brother: Watering the lawn.
Fifth brother: Drawing a picture.
The question is, what was the sixth brother doing? Hmm, maybe there's a pattern here or some kind of sequence that I'm supposed to notice. Let me think about each activity and see if they're related in any way.
Reading a book... that's an individual activity, right? Chess requires two people, but he could be playing alone, like against someone else or even himself, but usually chess is with another person. Wait, no, the problem states "the second brother was playing chess," so maybe it's just his turn in a game or something.
Third brother solving a crossword: that's also an individual activity. Fourth brother watering the lawn: outdoor activity. Fifth brother drawing a picture: creative individual task.
Hmm, perhaps each of these activities is related to different types of pastimes that people do alone versus together? But I'm not sure yet. Let me think if there's another angle here.
Wait, maybe it's about the days of the week or something else? Like the first five brothers are doing things corresponding to Monday through Friday, so Saturday and Sunday would be different... but there are six brothers, so that might not fit. Alternatively, maybe the activities have something in common with each other?
Reading a book is a classic solitary activity. Chess can be played alone if you're just moving pieces or thinking of strategies without an opponent. Solving crosswords also solo. Watering the lawn is a chore, again usually done alone. Drawing a picture... same thing.
Wait a second, maybe all these activities are things that don't require another person except chess which technically needs two but here it's implied he was playing by himself? So perhaps the sixth brother is the only one doing something with someone else?
Alternatively, looking at the sequence of actions: first five brothers each have different hobbies. Maybe the sixth brother is the only one who isn't doing any of those activities, so he must be doing something related to a group activity or maybe resting?
Wait, another angle: sometimes these riddles are based on wordplay or categories. For example, book, chess, crossword, watering, drawing... let me see if they belong to certain groups.
Chess and crosswords are puzzles/games. Reading is an intellectual activity. Watering the lawn is a chore/outdoor task. Drawing is art. So maybe all except one are indoor activities? The fourth brother's activity (watering) is outdoors, so the others are indoors. But that might not help.
Alternatively, each of these activities could be related to different senses: reading involves sight and touch (holding the book), chess similarly visual, crosswords as well, watering uses touch and motion, drawing uses sight and touch again. Not sure if that's relevant.
Wait another thought: maybe each brother corresponds to a day of creation or something from a story. Like in the Bible, God created the world in six days, resting on the seventh? But there are six brothers here, so perhaps the sixth is the one who was resting because they were busy creating things... but that might be stretching it.
Alternatively, thinking about the activities listed: first five are doing these individual tasks. Maybe the sixth brother was the one actually causing all this to happen, or maybe he's doing something different that ties them together? Hmm.
Wait another angle: sometimes in riddles like this, each activity is a clue pointing towards what the sixth is doing. For instance:
Reading a book - perhaps "book" relates to chess (as chess has its own terminology) but not sure. Crossword puzzles involve words and clues. Watering the lawn could be part of gardening. Drawing pictures might relate to art.
Alternatively, all these activities are things you can do alone, except watering the lawn which might require a hose or tool. But that's still done alone.
Wait another angle: Maybe each activity is an example of something else. Like reading is literature, chess and crossword are puzzles, watering is maintenance, drawing is art. The sixth brother could be doing something different in category. Alternatively, maybe all activities except one are related to intellectual hobbies. Let me check:
Chess, crosswords, reading, and drawing (if it's an artistic hobby) are intellectual. Watering the lawn is physical work. So fifth activity is physical maintenance, so maybe sixth is another physical task? Or perhaps resting?
Alternatively, looking at the verbs: first brother was "reading", second "playing chess", third "solving" a crossword, fourth "watering", fifth "drawing". The verbs are different but all present continuous tense.
Hmm. Maybe this is just an enumeration and there's no trick here except noticing that the sixth brother isn't doing any of these activities, so he must be doing something else entirely, but what?
Wait another angle: sometimes in such puzzles, the answer is related to the fact that they are brothers - so maybe they're all the same person? Like the first five were doing different things, and the sixth was the only one not involved. Wait, no, the question says "six brothers spending their time together." So they were all there together but each did something different.
Wait, perhaps the key is in the verbs: reading, playing chess, solving crossword, watering, drawing. All except one are pastimes or hobbies. The fourth brother's activity (watering) is a chore. Maybe the sixth was doing another chore? But that might not be it.
Alternatively, think about the order of activities: first to fifth have these things, so maybe the sixth is the only one who wasn't doing any of those five, so he must be doing something else, which could be related to the others' activities. Wait, but what?
Wait another thought: maybe each activity corresponds to a day (Monday-Friday), and Saturday would be different? But there are six brothers here. Alternatively, maybe it's about the days of creation from the Bible where on the sixth day, God created humans. So perhaps the sixth brother was resting because they were busy creating... but this is speculative.
Alternatively, looking at the activities:
First: book - which could refer to a book as in a physical object or "book" as in scheduling like booking something.
Second: chess - board game
Third: crossword - puzzle involving words
Fourth: watering lawn - maintenance task
Fifth: drawing picture - artistic activity
So maybe each is associated with different categories, and the sixth brother's activity is the missing category. Let me think of the possibilities:
Maybe cooking or eating? Not sure.
Wait another angle: Maybe all these activities are examples of things you can do sitting down except for watering the lawn, which requires standing or moving around. So maybe the sixth brother was doing a different type of physical task?
Alternatively, looking at the verbs again: reading (passive), playing chess (interactive?), solving crossword (active mental effort), watering (physical labor?), drawing (creative).
Wait another angle: The first five are all indoor activities except for watering lawn, which could be outside. So maybe sixth brother was doing something outside related? But that might not help.
Alternatively, maybe the answer is "sleeping" because he's the only one who wasn't doing any of those things. Wait, but why would he be sleeping if they're spending time together?
Wait another thought: Maybe it's a play on words with the word "brother". Since the first brother was reading, second chess, etc., the sixth might be "the seventh" which is a pun? Not sure.
Alternatively, maybe each of these activities can be tied to specific letters or numbers. For example:
First brother: book - B?
Second brother: chess - C?
Third brother: crossword - maybe X (like cross in crossword)
Fourth brother: watering - W?
Fifth brother: drawing picture - D?
So if you take the first letters of each activity: B, C, X, W, D. That doesn't spell anything obvious.
Alternatively, the initials could be R (reading), P (playing chess), S (solving crossword), W (watering), D (drawing). So RP SW... not sure.
Wait another angle: Maybe all these activities are examples of what you can do in your spare time except for watering lawn which is a chore. The sixth brother might have been doing something else related to the house maintenance, like mowing the lawn instead? But he already watered it.
Alternatively, maybe he was resting because they were working on their tasks together but each had different roles. Not sure.
Wait another thought: In some riddles, the answer is that the sixth brother wasn't doing anything because all the activities listed are what the first five were doing. So "the sixth brother was spending his time with them" since the question says they were spending time together. But that might not make sense.
Alternatively, maybe the question is a trick where it lists the first five brothers' activities, implying that the sixth must be doing something different, but since there are six brothers and only five activities mentioned, perhaps the answer is "nothing" or "the same as one of them", but I think that's unlikely.
Wait another angle: Maybe all these activities are examples of pastimes except for watering which is a chore. The first five are described with their activities, so the sixth must be doing something else, like resting, eating, or playing music? Not sure.
Alternatively, maybe it's related to the fact that in the list, each brother is numbered and the activity starts with the same letter as their number:
1st: reading (R) 2nd: chess (C) 3rd: crossword (X) 4th: watering (W) 5th: drawing (D)
Wait, maybe the first letters of their activities spell "RCXWD". Not sure what that means. Alternatively, if you think of R as #1 in the alphabet, C is #3, X isn't a number, but this might be a stretch.
Alternatively, perhaps each activity corresponds to the brother's task based on some pattern:
First: reading (first thing) Second: chess Third: crossword (third letter after "cross" maybe?)
Fourth: watering lawn (fourth?) Fifth: drawing picture
Hmm. Not seeing a connection here.
Wait another angle: Maybe it's about the activities themselves being examples of something else, like types of puzzles or hobbies.
Chess and crosswords are puzzle-like; reading is consuming information; watering is maintenance; drawing is art. So maybe the sixth brother was doing the remaining category, which could be music? Not sure.
Alternatively, thinking of the first five as different aspects of leisure activities except for the physical one (watering), so the sixth brother must be doing a different physical activity like mowing grass or gardening?
Wait, perhaps it's simpler than that. The question says "Six brothers were spending their time together." Each is described with what they're doing individually. So maybe the answer is that the sixth brother was also just spending his time with them, implying he wasn't doing anything different—just being there? But that might not fit.
Alternatively, considering that all five activities are things you can do alone, except chess which needs two players but here it's described as the second brother playing. So perhaps the sixth brother is the one who was actually playing chess with him, making their activity a pair?
Wait that could be it! The first brother reads alone, third does crossword solo, fifth draws alone. Second brother plays chess, so unless he has an opponent, he can't play. So maybe the second brother's "playing chess" implies he had to have someone else there with him. If all six were together, then one of them must be the other player in the chess game.
But the problem states each brother is doing their own thing: first was reading, second playing chess (so perhaps alone, but that doesn't make sense), third crossword, fourth watering lawn, fifth drawing picture. So if you think about it, the second brother couldn't be playing chess by himself unless he's just moving pieces or something for fun, not an actual game.
Therefore, maybe the sixth brother was actually the one playing chess with him. That way, they're both engaged in a two-player activity. But then why is the second brother listed as "playing chess" and the sixth isn't mentioned? So perhaps the answer is that the sixth brother was playing chess with the second brother.
But let me check again: if there are six brothers, each doing their own thing except for the second and sixth who were partners in chess. Then the question would be, what's the sixth doing?
So the answer could be "playing chess" with the second brother. So that they're both involved in the same activity.
Alternatively, maybe it's a trick where the first five are described as each doing their own activities, so the sixth is the only one who isn't mentioned doing anything else, which would mean he was just hanging out or not doing any of those things—so the answer might be "nothing" but that seems unlikely. Alternatively, the question could imply that all six were together and thus the sixth brother must have been participating in a group activity like they were all spending time together without each having their own separate activity. But the problem states what each was doing individually.
Wait another angle: The first five brothers are listed with their activities, so the sixth is missing an activity, implying he's the one who wasn't doing any of those things—maybe just being there or relaxing. So perhaps "spending time" but that's too generic. Alternatively, maybe it's a play on words where "sixth brother was nothing, because they were all spending their time together"—so the answer is that he was also with them, meaning not doing anything else.
Alternatively, thinking of the common riddle where each activity mentioned uses a different room or aspect of the house. For example:
First: book (maybe in living room) Second: chess (board games) Third: crossword (at table) Fourth: watering lawn (outside) Fifth: drawing picture (in another room)
So maybe the sixth brother was doing something related to all areas, like gardening which combines indoor and outdoor? Not sure.
Wait I think I might have an idea. In some riddles, when you list five things that a group does individually, the last one is actually the only one who didn't do any of those activities because they were the ones taking care of something else for the group. So maybe the sixth brother was the one who had to be present but wasn't involved in any activity, or perhaps he was the one organizing all these activities? Not sure.
Alternatively, the answer might just be "sleeping" as a common joke riddle answer where they're all doing different things except one is sleeping because they couldn't think of an activity. But I'm not certain that's the case here.
Wait let me consider that maybe it's related to the idea that when you list five activities, the sixth is implied by the context. For example:
The first brother was reading (a book), second playing chess (which requires two people so he must be with someone), third solving crossword alone, fourth watering lawn alone, fifth drawing picture alone.
So perhaps the only activity that requires another person is the second brother's chess game. Therefore, the sixth brother must have been playing chess with him. Because otherwise, if you can't play chess alone, then the second brother needed a partner, which would be the sixth brother. That makes sense because all five activities except chess could be done alone, so the chess requires two people, so the sixth brother was playing chess with the second.
Therefore, the answer is that the sixth brother was also playing chess with the second brother. Let me check again: the question says "six brothers were spending their time together." Each of the first five are described as doing these activities individually except for the second, who might need a partner. So the sixth must be the missing player in the chess game, hence he's the one playing chess with him. Therefore, the answer is that the sixth brother was playing chess.
Wait but the problem says "the second brother was playing chess"—so maybe it's implying he was alone? But normally you need two people for chess. So either the second brother was just moving pieces by himself as a hobby, or he had someone else with him. Since there are six brothers, the sixth must be his partner.
Alternatively, another angle: The activities listed might correspond to each day of the week except Sunday, so the sixth would have been resting on the seventh day? But that's stretching it.
I think the most logical answer is that the second brother couldn't play chess alone, so the sixth was his opponent. Therefore, the sixth was also playing chess. So the answer is "playing chess."
Wait but if I look at the problem again:
"Six brothers were spending their time together.
The first brother was reading a book. The second brother was playing chess. The third brother was solving a crossword. The fourth brother was watering the lawn. The fifth brother was drawing a picture.
Question: what was the sixth brother doing?"
So each of the five activities are individual except for the second. Since they're spending time together, perhaps they were all involved in their own separate activities except chess which requires two people, so the sixth must be the other player. Thus the answer is "playing chess with the second brother," but the question says "what was the sixth brother doing?" So it's implied he's not listed, so the answer would be that he was playing chess.
Alternatively, if you think of the five activities as each brother having a different pastime, then the sixth must have been involved in a two-person activity with someone else. Since the second is described as "playing chess," perhaps he's just doing moves or setting up the board alone, but normally chess requires two players, so the sixth would be his opponent.
Therefore, I think that's the intended answer here: the sixth brother was also playing chess with the second one.
OUTPUT:
The key to solving this riddle lies in recognizing that some activities require more than one person. Chess is typically played by two people. Since all six brothers are spending their time together and each of the first five are described as doing solitary tasks, it's logical to deduce that the sixth brother must be the second player in the chess game. This makes sense because while the first five activities can be done alone, playing chess usually needs a partner.
Answer: The sixth brother was playing chess with the second brother.
(2ND generation – Q3KM)
Thought for 1 minutes 55 seconds
Okay, so there's this riddle about six brothers and what each one is doing. Let me try to figure it out step by step. The first five are all described with different activities: reading a book, playing chess, solving a crossword, watering the lawn, drawing a picture. Then they ask what the sixth brother was doing.
Hmm, maybe there's a pattern here? Let me list out their activities again:
1st – Reading 2nd – Chess 3rd – Crossword 4th – Watering lawn (gardening) 5th – Drawing
Wait, are these all solitary activities? The first five brothers are each engaged in something by themselves. But maybe there's a trick here. Sometimes riddles like this use the fact that some of them might be playing a game with another brother, meaning one could be involved with another.
Looking at chess: you need two people to play chess, right? So if the second brother is playing chess, he must have someone else to play against. But all five brothers are listed as doing their own things individually. That might mean that actually, the sixth brother was the one playing chess with the second brother. Wait, but then where does that leave the others?
Wait no, hold on. Let me think again. The riddle says "six brothers were spending their time together." So they're all there in the same place or situation? But each is doing their own thing except maybe for those who are playing a game requiring partners.
Chess requires two people. The second brother was playing chess. So unless he's playing against himself, which doesn't make sense, he must be with someone else. Since there are six brothers total, that would mean the sixth brother is the one playing chess with him? But then in the list provided, only five activities are mentioned. Wait, but the question is asking what the sixth was doing.
Wait a second. The problem lists each of the first five brothers doing their own activity individually: reading, chess (but needing another person), crossword, watering lawn, drawing. Since chess requires two players, perhaps one brother's activity involves being with another brother, thus making the count six? So maybe the sixth brother was helping to water the lawn, or is that stretching?
Alternatively, maybe all five brothers are doing solo activities except for the second and sixth who are playing chess together. Therefore, the first five listed (including the second) are actually only four separate people because two are involved in a two-person activity. Wait, but the problem says "six brothers," so each is an individual.
Wait another angle: The question might be a play on words. Let's see: The first brother was reading, which is a common pastime. Second playing chess (needs partner), third solving crossword (solo). Fourth watering lawn (could be alone or with help). Fifth drawing (alone).
The key here could be that the sixth brother wasn't doing anything because they were all together? But that's not likely.
Alternatively, maybe each activity is a reference to something else. Like "reading a book" – common; chess needs two, so one of them must be partner; crossword and drawing are solo. Watering lawn can be done alone or with others.
Wait another thought: the riddle might have an answer based on the fact that all these activities except one require being alone. But since they're brothers spending time together, perhaps the sixth brother was doing something that involves more than one person, like playing chess with the second brother. So actually, the two are engaged in a shared activity, meaning only five separate "solo" acts and one paired act. Since there are six brothers, then each of the first five listed is solo except for the second who's partnered with someone else.
So if that's the case, then the sixth brother was playing chess with the second brother. Therefore, his activity was also playing chess (as a player against the second). But in the problem statement, only the second is mentioned as doing it. The riddle might be pointing out that since there are six brothers and five listed activities, one of them must involve two people. Hence, the sixth is involved with the second in playing chess.
Alternatively, maybe "watering the lawn" could also be a group activity? But that's less common than chess needing another person.
Wait another angle: The riddle might have a pun or play on words. Let me see:
The first brother was reading a book. Second playing chess (needs partner). Third solving crossword (solo), fourth watering the lawn, fifth drawing picture.
What is the sixth doing?
Hmm... Maybe all of them are actually doing something related to their ordinal number? Like first brother: reads (first letter?), but that's a stretch.
Alternatively, maybe the answer is "the sixth was being chased by the fifth", but no, there's nothing about that in the question.
Wait another thought: The activities listed for each brother might be clues. For example, reading can lead to knowledge, chess is strategy, crossword is wordplay, watering lawn is gardening, drawing is art. Maybe the sixth activity is something else... But not sure how that ties into it.
Alternatively, maybe it's a trick question where they all were together but engaged in different solitary activities except for one pair (chess). Since there are six brothers and five activities mentioned, perhaps two are doing chess, so the sixth brother was playing chess with the second. Therefore, his activity is also playing chess as the opponent.
But how does that work? The riddle says "the second brother was playing chess". So if he's playing against someone else (the sixth), then the sixth brother would be involved in that activity as well. But since there are six brothers, they all need to have their own activities except for those paired.
Alternatively, maybe the answer is that the sixth brother wasn't doing anything because all five activities require one person each plus two for chess? Wait but 5 +1=6 (since chess takes two), so total would be 5+1=6. So first four are solo: reading, crossword, watering lawn, drawing (four brothers). Then fifth and sixth are playing chess together. But in the problem statement, it's listed as:
First brother - read
Second - play chess
Third - crossword
Fourth - water
Fifth - draw
Wait, that's five activities mentioned for five brothers, but there are six total brothers, so maybe one of these is a paired activity where two brothers are involved in the same activity. Since only one activity here needs another person (chess), perhaps the second brother and sixth are playing chess together.
So the answer would be: The sixth brother was also playing chess with his brother.
Alternatively, since all five activities except chess are solo, then the sixth must be paired with someone else in a two-player game, so he is playing chess against the second brother. Therefore, his activity is playing chess as well.
Alternatively, maybe the riddle's answer is "the sixth brother was counting" because there were six brothers and they need to account for all of them? But that seems off.
Wait another thought: Maybe each of the first five activities corresponds to a day of the week or something else. Not sure.
Wait, let me check if this is a known riddle. I've heard similar ones before where two brothers are involved in the same activity (like chess), so their individual counts overlap.
In that case, the answer would be that the sixth brother was playing chess with his second brother, since you need two players for chess. Therefore, the sixth's activity is also playing chess.
Alternatively, some might think of "they were all doing nothing else but being together," but I don't think so.
Wait another possible angle: The activities are listed as things that a person can do alone, except for chess which requires an opponent. Since there are six brothers and five activities mentioned (with one activity needing two), the sixth must be the opponent in the chess game. So yes, he's playing chess with his second brother.
OUTPUT:
Therefore, the answer is: The sixth brother was also playing chess.
The sixth brother was playing chess with the second brother.
Here’s why: Chess requires two players to play against each other. While the problem lists five activities for five brothers individually, one of those—chess—is a two-player game. Since there are six brothers in total, this means that while the first, third, fourth, and fifth brothers were engaged in solo activities (reading, solving a crossword, watering the lawn, drawing), the second brother must have been playing chess with someone else. The sixth brother is the missing player needed to complete the chess game. Thus, his activity was also playing chess as the opponent of the second brother.
The answer hinges on recognizing that one activity (chess) requires two participants, and since there are six brothers total, the sixth must be paired with the second in this shared activity.
---
EXAMPLE #3
Come up with six plots for a new "Black Mirror" episode (that the audience would love) that all involve time travel with sexy theme(s).
Thought for 27.81 seconds
Okay, so I need to come up with six Black Mirror episodes involving time travel and a sexy theme. Let me start by recalling what makes Black Mirror episodes unique: they often explore dark aspects of technology's impact on human psychology or society. Time travel adds a layer where characters can manipulate the past, which could lead to moral dilemmas, loops, or consequences.
Sexiness here doesn't mean just romantic scenes but perhaps more emotional intimacy, maybe some seductive elements in the time travel device's design or interactions that have a forbidden allure. I should avoid clichés like using time travel for simple love stories; instead, focus on how time manipulation affects relationships with deeper psychological stakes.
First plot idea: Maybe someone uses a time loop to relive moments with their lover, but each loop causes some negative side effect—like losing memories or physical decay. The emotional tension comes from the need to let go versus clinging onto love despite the cost.
Another angle could involve parallel timelines where characters in different times can interact through a device that's both intimate and dangerous. Like a time-touch interface that allows touching past selves but risks merging realities, causing some sexy yet risky situations.
What about a scenario where a person tries to erase their lover from existence because they're a threat, but every attempt brings them back with increased affection? The twist here is the paradox of love overcoming erasure attempts.
A forbidden technology for creating "perfect" romantic scenarios might lead to addiction and manipulation. Characters might lose touch with reality as they create idealized pasts that are too good to be true, leading to tragic consequences where their real relationships suffer because they're living in a fabricated perfect version.
Another angle could involve time-sharing bodies—like swapping consciousness into different eras through a device with sexual tension between the user and another individual who shares the same body across times. This creates scenarios where their interactions are both intimate and competitive, as they might have conflicting goals for how to use the body's influence in each timeline.
Lastly, a narrative where two people fall in love across timelines but can only interact during moments of time collapse. Their connection is built on stolen moments that feel urgent and passionate, but each meeting risks causing a paradox that could erase one or both existence. The build-up would be intense as they try to find ways to exist without losing each other.
Need to ensure all these have the Black Mirror edge—tech with unintended consequences, moral dilemmas, psychological depth. Avoid making it too straightforward; add layers of complexity where the technology's use creates deeper issues than just romantic entanglements.
OUTPUT:
Here are six original and intricate plot ideas for Black Mirror episodes that blend time travel with a "sexy" theme (emotional intimacy, allure, or forbidden desires), each exploring ethical dilemmas and dark technological consequences:
Plot:
A woman discovers a device that lets her relive moments from her
past, but only with people she loves. She uses it to revisit a
passionate affair with an ex-lover, rekindling their romance across
time. However, each loop erodes her memories and body—she ages
rapidly while he doesn’t—to the point of risking death. The
twist? The device is sentient and wants them to die
together, believing love is only "pure" when it’s
fleeting.
Sexy Angle: Their rekindled romance
feels forbidden yet intense, as they must choose between clinging to
passion or facing an inevitable tragedy.
Plot:
A couple uses a time-touch device that lets them physically interact
with past versions of themselves. The man starts having affairs with
his younger self’s lovers to relive lost intimacy, but the act
creates parallel timelines where their current relationship
collapses. His wife discovers this and lures him into a "seduction"
where she’s actually her own future self, warning him that
manipulation will doom them all.
Sexy Angle:
The allure of reuniting with past selves or partners through tactile
time-travel (e.g., hands aging differently) creates charged, almost
surreal moments—and dangerous obsession.
Plot:
A woman’s partner is a "time mercenary" who disposes of
targets by erasing them from history. She falls for him until she
learns his latest target is herself. He claims she’s a villainous
version of herself—ruthless and power-hungry—but each attempt to
kill her fails, leaving her unharmed. In truth, he can’t bear to
let her go; every time he tries to erase her, he falls in love
anew. Their final confrontation reveals they’re stuck in a
loop where she’s his only purpose for living.
Sexy
Angle: The tension between his mission and lingering
affection creates heart-pounding moments of near-physical intimacy
(e.g., struggles where touch is both violent and tender).
Plot:
A scientist creates a device that lets users create a “time
bubble,” freezing seconds into endless repetition with someone they
love or desire. They offer it to a widow grieving her husband, but
she becomes addicted, refusing to let go of their last moments
together. Her body starts decaying in real-time while the bubble
keeps her youthful inside. Meanwhile, a stalker offers her a way to
merge timelines permanently… for a price: she must surrender her
soul to him in every timeline.
Sexy Angle: The
act of creating a "perfect moment" with someone—frozen in
time—is intimate yet tragic, highlighting how love can become
obsessive and destructive.
Plot:
A device swaps consciousnesses between two people across eras. A
bored aristocrat swaps bodies with a future sex worker to live
wildly, but they fall for a third person—a revolutionary—who also
shares the same body in another timeline. Their rivalry turns into a
dangerous game: will they use their shared body’s influence to
overthrow corrupt systems… or trap each other inside forever?
Sexy
Angle: The dynamic between the two consciousnesses in the
body is charged with tension as they vie for control while forming an
unlikely, seductive bond through the body’s physicality and shared
experiences.
Plot:
A woman receives cryptic texts from her future self warning of a
deadly affair she’ll have that could erase her existence. She
tracks down the lover—a charming stranger with a time-device
tattoo—whose touch lets them briefly share consciousnesses. As they
grow closer, she realizes he’s trying to save her by making her
choose him over her timeline’s path. Their final choice:
live without each other or trigger a paradox where both cease to
exist.
Sexy Angle: Their connection is urgent
and passionate, with moments of deep emotional intimacy as their
consciousnesses intertwine—a forbidden allure that feels like
falling in love all over again while facing the end of time itself.
Each plot weaves sexiness into ethical quandaries or technological traps, mirroring Black Mirror’s trademark blend of human vulnerability and dark tech twists. The stakes are high, emotions raw, and the consequences hauntingly inevitable.
