Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
# | |
# distutils/version.py | |
# | |
# Implements multiple version numbering conventions for the | |
# Python Module Distribution Utilities. | |
# | |
# $Id$ | |
# | |
"""Provides classes to represent module version numbers (one class for | |
each style of version numbering). There are currently two such classes | |
implemented: StrictVersion and LooseVersion. | |
Every version number class implements the following interface: | |
* the 'parse' method takes a string and parses it to some internal | |
representation; if the string is an invalid version number, | |
'parse' raises a ValueError exception | |
* the class constructor takes an optional string argument which, | |
if supplied, is passed to 'parse' | |
* __str__ reconstructs the string that was passed to 'parse' (or | |
an equivalent string -- ie. one that will generate an equivalent | |
version number instance) | |
* __repr__ generates Python code to recreate the version number instance | |
* _cmp compares the current instance with either another instance | |
of the same class or a string (which will be parsed to an instance | |
of the same class, thus must follow the same rules) | |
""" | |
import re | |
import warnings | |
import contextlib | |
def suppress_known_deprecation(): | |
with warnings.catch_warnings(record=True) as ctx: | |
warnings.filterwarnings( | |
action='default', | |
category=DeprecationWarning, | |
message="distutils Version classes are deprecated.", | |
) | |
yield ctx | |
class Version: | |
"""Abstract base class for version numbering classes. Just provides | |
constructor (__init__) and reproducer (__repr__), because those | |
seem to be the same for all version numbering classes; and route | |
rich comparisons to _cmp. | |
""" | |
def __init__(self, vstring=None): | |
if vstring: | |
self.parse(vstring) | |
warnings.warn( | |
"distutils Version classes are deprecated. " | |
"Use packaging.version instead.", | |
DeprecationWarning, | |
stacklevel=2, | |
) | |
def __repr__(self): | |
return "{} ('{}')".format(self.__class__.__name__, str(self)) | |
def __eq__(self, other): | |
c = self._cmp(other) | |
if c is NotImplemented: | |
return c | |
return c == 0 | |
def __lt__(self, other): | |
c = self._cmp(other) | |
if c is NotImplemented: | |
return c | |
return c < 0 | |
def __le__(self, other): | |
c = self._cmp(other) | |
if c is NotImplemented: | |
return c | |
return c <= 0 | |
def __gt__(self, other): | |
c = self._cmp(other) | |
if c is NotImplemented: | |
return c | |
return c > 0 | |
def __ge__(self, other): | |
c = self._cmp(other) | |
if c is NotImplemented: | |
return c | |
return c >= 0 | |
# Interface for version-number classes -- must be implemented | |
# by the following classes (the concrete ones -- Version should | |
# be treated as an abstract class). | |
# __init__ (string) - create and take same action as 'parse' | |
# (string parameter is optional) | |
# parse (string) - convert a string representation to whatever | |
# internal representation is appropriate for | |
# this style of version numbering | |
# __str__ (self) - convert back to a string; should be very similar | |
# (if not identical to) the string supplied to parse | |
# __repr__ (self) - generate Python code to recreate | |
# the instance | |
# _cmp (self, other) - compare two version numbers ('other' may | |
# be an unparsed version string, or another | |
# instance of your version class) | |
class StrictVersion(Version): | |
"""Version numbering for anal retentives and software idealists. | |
Implements the standard interface for version number classes as | |
described above. A version number consists of two or three | |
dot-separated numeric components, with an optional "pre-release" tag | |
on the end. The pre-release tag consists of the letter 'a' or 'b' | |
followed by a number. If the numeric components of two version | |
numbers are equal, then one with a pre-release tag will always | |
be deemed earlier (lesser) than one without. | |
The following are valid version numbers (shown in the order that | |
would be obtained by sorting according to the supplied cmp function): | |
0.4 0.4.0 (these two are equivalent) | |
0.4.1 | |
0.5a1 | |
0.5b3 | |
0.5 | |
0.9.6 | |
1.0 | |
1.0.4a3 | |
1.0.4b1 | |
1.0.4 | |
The following are examples of invalid version numbers: | |
1 | |
2.7.2.2 | |
1.3.a4 | |
1.3pl1 | |
1.3c4 | |
The rationale for this version numbering system will be explained | |
in the distutils documentation. | |
""" | |
version_re = re.compile( | |
r'^(\d+) \. (\d+) (\. (\d+))? ([ab](\d+))?$', re.VERBOSE | re.ASCII | |
) | |
def parse(self, vstring): | |
match = self.version_re.match(vstring) | |
if not match: | |
raise ValueError("invalid version number '%s'" % vstring) | |
(major, minor, patch, prerelease, prerelease_num) = match.group(1, 2, 4, 5, 6) | |
if patch: | |
self.version = tuple(map(int, [major, minor, patch])) | |
else: | |
self.version = tuple(map(int, [major, minor])) + (0,) | |
if prerelease: | |
self.prerelease = (prerelease[0], int(prerelease_num)) | |
else: | |
self.prerelease = None | |
def __str__(self): | |
if self.version[2] == 0: | |
vstring = '.'.join(map(str, self.version[0:2])) | |
else: | |
vstring = '.'.join(map(str, self.version)) | |
if self.prerelease: | |
vstring = vstring + self.prerelease[0] + str(self.prerelease[1]) | |
return vstring | |
def _cmp(self, other): # noqa: C901 | |
if isinstance(other, str): | |
with suppress_known_deprecation(): | |
other = StrictVersion(other) | |
elif not isinstance(other, StrictVersion): | |
return NotImplemented | |
if self.version != other.version: | |
# numeric versions don't match | |
# prerelease stuff doesn't matter | |
if self.version < other.version: | |
return -1 | |
else: | |
return 1 | |
# have to compare prerelease | |
# case 1: neither has prerelease; they're equal | |
# case 2: self has prerelease, other doesn't; other is greater | |
# case 3: self doesn't have prerelease, other does: self is greater | |
# case 4: both have prerelease: must compare them! | |
if not self.prerelease and not other.prerelease: | |
return 0 | |
elif self.prerelease and not other.prerelease: | |
return -1 | |
elif not self.prerelease and other.prerelease: | |
return 1 | |
elif self.prerelease and other.prerelease: | |
if self.prerelease == other.prerelease: | |
return 0 | |
elif self.prerelease < other.prerelease: | |
return -1 | |
else: | |
return 1 | |
else: | |
assert False, "never get here" | |
# end class StrictVersion | |
# The rules according to Greg Stein: | |
# 1) a version number has 1 or more numbers separated by a period or by | |
# sequences of letters. If only periods, then these are compared | |
# left-to-right to determine an ordering. | |
# 2) sequences of letters are part of the tuple for comparison and are | |
# compared lexicographically | |
# 3) recognize the numeric components may have leading zeroes | |
# | |
# The LooseVersion class below implements these rules: a version number | |
# string is split up into a tuple of integer and string components, and | |
# comparison is a simple tuple comparison. This means that version | |
# numbers behave in a predictable and obvious way, but a way that might | |
# not necessarily be how people *want* version numbers to behave. There | |
# wouldn't be a problem if people could stick to purely numeric version | |
# numbers: just split on period and compare the numbers as tuples. | |
# However, people insist on putting letters into their version numbers; | |
# the most common purpose seems to be: | |
# - indicating a "pre-release" version | |
# ('alpha', 'beta', 'a', 'b', 'pre', 'p') | |
# - indicating a post-release patch ('p', 'pl', 'patch') | |
# but of course this can't cover all version number schemes, and there's | |
# no way to know what a programmer means without asking him. | |
# | |
# The problem is what to do with letters (and other non-numeric | |
# characters) in a version number. The current implementation does the | |
# obvious and predictable thing: keep them as strings and compare | |
# lexically within a tuple comparison. This has the desired effect if | |
# an appended letter sequence implies something "post-release": | |
# eg. "0.99" < "0.99pl14" < "1.0", and "5.001" < "5.001m" < "5.002". | |
# | |
# However, if letters in a version number imply a pre-release version, | |
# the "obvious" thing isn't correct. Eg. you would expect that | |
# "1.5.1" < "1.5.2a2" < "1.5.2", but under the tuple/lexical comparison | |
# implemented here, this just isn't so. | |
# | |
# Two possible solutions come to mind. The first is to tie the | |
# comparison algorithm to a particular set of semantic rules, as has | |
# been done in the StrictVersion class above. This works great as long | |
# as everyone can go along with bondage and discipline. Hopefully a | |
# (large) subset of Python module programmers will agree that the | |
# particular flavour of bondage and discipline provided by StrictVersion | |
# provides enough benefit to be worth using, and will submit their | |
# version numbering scheme to its domination. The free-thinking | |
# anarchists in the lot will never give in, though, and something needs | |
# to be done to accommodate them. | |
# | |
# Perhaps a "moderately strict" version class could be implemented that | |
# lets almost anything slide (syntactically), and makes some heuristic | |
# assumptions about non-digits in version number strings. This could | |
# sink into special-case-hell, though; if I was as talented and | |
# idiosyncratic as Larry Wall, I'd go ahead and implement a class that | |
# somehow knows that "1.2.1" < "1.2.2a2" < "1.2.2" < "1.2.2pl3", and is | |
# just as happy dealing with things like "2g6" and "1.13++". I don't | |
# think I'm smart enough to do it right though. | |
# | |
# In any case, I've coded the test suite for this module (see | |
# ../test/test_version.py) specifically to fail on things like comparing | |
# "1.2a2" and "1.2". That's not because the *code* is doing anything | |
# wrong, it's because the simple, obvious design doesn't match my | |
# complicated, hairy expectations for real-world version numbers. It | |
# would be a snap to fix the test suite to say, "Yep, LooseVersion does | |
# the Right Thing" (ie. the code matches the conception). But I'd rather | |
# have a conception that matches common notions about version numbers. | |
class LooseVersion(Version): | |
"""Version numbering for anarchists and software realists. | |
Implements the standard interface for version number classes as | |
described above. A version number consists of a series of numbers, | |
separated by either periods or strings of letters. When comparing | |
version numbers, the numeric components will be compared | |
numerically, and the alphabetic components lexically. The following | |
are all valid version numbers, in no particular order: | |
1.5.1 | |
1.5.2b2 | |
161 | |
3.10a | |
8.02 | |
3.4j | |
1996.07.12 | |
3.2.pl0 | |
3.1.1.6 | |
2g6 | |
11g | |
0.960923 | |
2.2beta29 | |
1.13++ | |
5.5.kw | |
2.0b1pl0 | |
In fact, there is no such thing as an invalid version number under | |
this scheme; the rules for comparison are simple and predictable, | |
but may not always give the results you want (for some definition | |
of "want"). | |
""" | |
component_re = re.compile(r'(\d+ | [a-z]+ | \.)', re.VERBOSE) | |
def parse(self, vstring): | |
# I've given up on thinking I can reconstruct the version string | |
# from the parsed tuple -- so I just store the string here for | |
# use by __str__ | |
self.vstring = vstring | |
components = [x for x in self.component_re.split(vstring) if x and x != '.'] | |
for i, obj in enumerate(components): | |
try: | |
components[i] = int(obj) | |
except ValueError: | |
pass | |
self.version = components | |
def __str__(self): | |
return self.vstring | |
def __repr__(self): | |
return "LooseVersion ('%s')" % str(self) | |
def _cmp(self, other): | |
if isinstance(other, str): | |
other = LooseVersion(other) | |
elif not isinstance(other, LooseVersion): | |
return NotImplemented | |
if self.version == other.version: | |
return 0 | |
if self.version < other.version: | |
return -1 | |
if self.version > other.version: | |
return 1 | |
# end class LooseVersion | |