Papers
arxiv:2412.08905

Phi-4 Technical Report

Published on Dec 12
· Submitted by akhaliq on Dec 13
#1 Paper of the day
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

We present phi-4, a 14-billion parameter language model developed with a training recipe that is centrally focused on data quality. Unlike most language models, where pre-training is based primarily on organic data sources such as web content or code, phi-4 strategically incorporates synthetic data throughout the training process. While previous models in the Phi family largely distill the capabilities of a teacher model (specifically GPT-4), phi-4 substantially surpasses its teacher model on STEM-focused QA capabilities, giving evidence that our data-generation and post-training techniques go beyond distillation. Despite minimal changes to the phi-3 architecture, phi-4 achieves strong performance relative to its size -- especially on reasoning-focused benchmarks -- due to improved data, training curriculum, and innovations in the post-training scheme.

Community

Paper submitter

Screenshot 2024-12-12 at 8.41.06 PM.png

so its no longer "tiny llms that punch above their weight", its just "small" 14B models?

This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.

The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API

Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!

If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space

You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend

This comment has been hidden

Thanks for thorough description of various synthetic pipelines!
I have a question about filtering QA pairs. How to apply majority voting to LLM answers?
When the answer is an option it's straightforward, but for open question it won't work.

·
Paper author

good question, plurality sampling is mainly beneficial in the scope of higher-reasoning math/science questions and so you can often use another LLM agent to extract some final answer in a specific format, find the majority and fairly compare.

Sign up or log in to comment

Models citing this paper 1

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2412.08905 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2412.08905 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 40