Papers
arxiv:2308.11432

A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents

Published on Aug 22, 2023
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Autonomous agents have long been a prominent research focus in both academic and industry communities. Previous research in this field often focuses on training agents with limited knowledge within isolated environments, which diverges significantly from human learning processes, and thus makes the agents hard to achieve human-like decisions. Recently, through the acquisition of vast amounts of web knowledge, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in achieving human-level intelligence. This has sparked an upsurge in studies investigating LLM-based autonomous agents. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of these studies, delivering a systematic review of the field of LLM-based autonomous agents from a holistic perspective. More specifically, we first discuss the construction of LLM-based autonomous agents, for which we propose a unified framework that encompasses a majority of the previous work. Then, we present a comprehensive overview of the diverse applications of LLM-based autonomous agents in the fields of social science, natural science, and engineering. Finally, we delve into the evaluation strategies commonly used for LLM-based autonomous agents. Based on the previous studies, we also present several challenges and future directions in this field. To keep track of this field and continuously update our survey, we maintain a repository of relevant references at https://github.com/Paitesanshi/LLM-Agent-Survey.

Community

Reading this paper felt very informative, until I read on page 15 a summary about the ToolfFormer paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.04761) that seemed off to me.

The summary sounds quite convincing, but I know ToolFormer, and it is not "an LLM-based tool transformation system". I don't care which parts of this survey are AI generated, but now I wonder how many hallucinations I have learned on the first 15 pages, and I have difficulties to continue reading the survey :(

The survey has almost 800 citations and seemed awesome before I came accross the ToolFormer summary. Has anyone else read the survey and can tell me whether the ToolFormer summary was a one-off "RAG error"?

·

I expected the authors to ignore my critical email, but they responded very quickly and kindly:

  • the paper is almost fully human written, very few parts have been rewritten by AI
  • since the author's main focus was on the general paper structure like the agent framework and the agent applications, they did not catch the mistake
  • they are now carefully double checking the paper and will update a new version in the next two days.

Many thanks to the authors, who really deserve all the citations they have received.

Sign up or log in to comment

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2308.11432 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2308.11432 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 1

Collections including this paper 3