Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -127,25 +127,20 @@ After exensive grid search, supervised fine tuning of Llama 3.1-8B with LORA+ re
|
|
127 |
|
128 |
## Evaluation
|
129 |
|
130 |
-
<!-- This section describes the evaluation protocols and provides the results. -->
|
131 |
|
132 |
-
|
133 |
-
|
134 |
-
#### Testing Data
|
135 |
-
|
136 |
-
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card if possible. -->
|
137 |
-
|
138 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
139 |
-
|
140 |
-
#### Factors
|
141 |
|
142 |
-
|
|
|
143 |
|
144 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
146 |
-
#### Metrics
|
147 |
|
148 |
-
<!-- These are the evaluation metrics being used, ideally with a description of why. -->
|
149 |
|
150 |
[More Information Needed]
|
151 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
128 |
## Evaluation
|
129 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
131 |
+
#### Metrics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
133 |
+
Since the fine-tuned model is designed to summarize newly learned data, ROUGE and BERTScore metrics were measured on a sample of 50 manually crafted questions. The reference answers were constructed during the creation of the training and evaluation sets.
|
134 |
+
Given that GPT-4-turbo was already used in this context, I did not compare my model against it. Instead, I chose to compare it against the following models:
|
135 |
|
136 |
+
| Metric | quantum-research-bot-v1.0 | Meta-Llama-3.1-8B | gemini-1.5-pro |
|
137 |
+
|:------------------|:---------------------------|:--------------------|:------------------|
|
138 |
+
| **BERTScore F1** | 0.5821 | 0.3305 | 0.4982 |
|
139 |
+
| **ROUGE-1** | 0.6045 | 0.3152 |0.5029 |
|
140 |
+
| **ROUGE-2**| 0.4098 | 0.1751 | 0.3104 |
|
141 |
+
| **ROUGE-L**| 0.5809 | 0.2902 | 0.4856 |
|
142 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
145 |
[More Information Needed]
|
146 |
|