Update README.md

README.md

@@ -132,14 +132,14 @@ test_dataset = test_dataset.map(speech_file_to_array_fn)
 # Preprocessing the datasets.
 # We need to read the audio files as arrays
 def evaluate(batch):
-\tinputs = processor(batch["speech"], sampling_rate=16_000, return_tensors="pt", padding=True)
+\\tinputs = processor(batch["speech"], sampling_rate=16_000, return_tensors="pt", padding=True)
 
-\twith torch.no_grad():
-\t\tlogits = model(inputs.input_values.to(DEVICE), attention_mask=inputs.attention_mask.to(DEVICE)).logits
+\\twith torch.no_grad():
+\\t\\tlogits = model(inputs.input_values.to(DEVICE), attention_mask=inputs.attention_mask.to(DEVICE)).logits
 
-\tpred_ids = torch.argmax(logits, dim=-1)
-\tbatch["pred_strings"] = processor.batch_decode(pred_ids)
-\treturn batch
+\\tpred_ids = torch.argmax(logits, dim=-1)
+\\tbatch["pred_strings"] = processor.batch_decode(pred_ids)
+\\treturn batch
 
 result = test_dataset.map(evaluate, batched=True, batch_size=8)
 
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ print(f"CER: {cer.compute(predictions=predictions, references=references, chunk_
 
 **Test Result**:
 
-My model may report better scores than others because of some specificity of my evaluation script, so I ran the same evaluation script on other models (on 2021-04-21) to make a fairer comparison.
+In the table below I report the Word Error Rate (WER) and the Character Error Rate (CER) of the model. I ran the evaluation script described above on other models as well (on 2021-04-21). Note that the table below may show different results from those already reported, this may have been caused due to some specificity of the other evaluation scripts used.
 
 | Model | WER | CER |
 | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- |