label
int64
0
4
cleaned_text
stringlengths
5
368
2
Since the movie is based on a Nicholas Sparks best seller you know death is lurking around the corner just waiting to spoil things
1
Bottomrung New Jack City wannabe
1
Fincher takes no apparent joy in making movies and he gives none to the audience
1
It 's mildly amusing but I certainly ca n't recommend it
3
Nicholas Nickleby celebrates the human spirit with such unrelenting Dickensian decency that it turned me LRB horrors RRB
2
into Scrooge
1
Fear Dot Com is more frustrating than a modem that disconnects every seconds
1
Full of flatulence jokes and mild sexual references Kung Pow
1
is the kind of movie that 's criticproof simply because it aims so low
0
May cause you to bite your tongue to keep from laughing at the ridiculous dialog or the ohso convenient plot twists
1
There are just too many characters saying too many clever things and getting into too many pointless situations
0
Where 's the movie here
2
A dark dull thriller with a parting shot that misfires
1
Lacking substance and soul Crossroads comes up shorter than Britney 's cutoffs
1
Cassavetes thinks he 's making Dog Day Afternoon with a cause but all he 's done is to reduce everything he touches to a shrill didactic cartoon
0
Buries an interesting storyline about morality and the choices we make underneath such a mountain of clichés and borrowed images that it might more accurately be titled Mr Chips off the Old Block
1
Although sensitive to a fault it 's often overwritten with a surfeit of weighty revelations flowery dialogue and nostalgia for the past and roads not taken
0
It 's so badly made on every level that I 'm actually having a hard time believing people were paid to make it
1
In the real world an actor this uncharismatically beautiful would have a résumé loaded with credits like Girl in Bar # ''
1
although this idea is new '' the results are tired
3
I 'm guessing the director is a magician
1
After all he took three minutes of dialogue seconds of plot and turned them into a minute movie that feels five hours long
1
An unencouraging threefold expansion on the former MTV series accompanying the stunthungry dimwits in a random series of collected gags pranks pratfalls dares injuries etc
0
In its own way Joshua is as blasphemous and nonsensical as a Luis Buñuel film without the latter 's attendant intelligence poetry passion and genius
0
an appalling Ace Ventura ' ripoff that somehow manages to bring together Kevin Pollak former wrestler Chyna and Dolly Parton
1
If any of them list this credit ' on their resumes in the future that 'll be much funnier than anything in the film
0
The only entertainment you 'll derive from this choppy and sloppy affair will be from unintentional giggles several of them
1
Puportedly Based on True Events '' a convolution of language that suggests it 's impossible to claim that it is Based on a True Story '' with a straight face
0
a plotline that 's as lumpy as twoday old porridge the filmmakers ' paws sad to say were all over this unbearable '' project
3
Tambor and Clayburgh make an appealing couple he 's understated and sardonic she 's appealingly manic and energetic
1
Both deserve better
1
that the true story ' by which All the Queen 's Men is allegedly inspired '' was a lot funnier and more deftly enacted than what 's been cobbled together onscreen
0
Is there a group of more selfabsorbed women than the mother and daughters featured in this film
1
I do n't think so
1
Nothing wrong with performances here but the whiney characters bugged me
1
Not a stereotype is omitted nor a cliché left unsaid
0
Another week another grossout college comedy ugh
1
A battle between bugeye theatre and deadeye matinee
0
The movie is virtually without context journalistic or historical
1
What 's worse is that Pelosi knows it
1
instead go rent Shakes The Clown '' a much funnier film with a similar theme and an equally great Robin Williams performance
1
If the title is a Jeopardy question then the answer might be How does Steven Seagal come across these days ''
0
or maybe How will you feel after an minute ripoff of The Rock with action confined to slomo gun firing and random glassshattering ''
0
The appeal of the vulgar sexist racist humour went over my head or considering just how low brow it is perhaps it snuck under my feet
1
The story really has no place to go since Simone is not real she ca n't provide any conflict
1
Firsttime director João Pedro Rodrigues ' unwillingness to define his hero 's background or motivations becomes more and more frustrating as the film goes on
0
Interview '' loses its overall sense of mystery and becomes a TV episode rather than a documentary that you actually buy into
1
Unfaithful ' cheats on itself and retreats to comfortable territory
1
Too bad
0
Thoughtless random superficial humour and a lot of very bad Scouse accents
1
Plays like one of those conversations that Comic Book Guy on The Simpsons '' has
2
Juwanna Mann ''
1
No thanks
1
Wewannour money back actually
2
Newcomer helmer Kevin Donovan is hamstrung by a badly handled screenplay of what is really an amusing concept a hightech tux that transforms its wearer into a superman
0
Should n't have been allowed to use the word new '' in its title because there 's not an original character siuation or joke in the entire movie
1
Often silly and gross but it 's rarely as moronic as some campus grossout films
1
The advantage of a postapocalyptic setting is that it can be made on the cheap
1
Any rock pile will do for a set
0
Reign of Fire has the disadvantage of also looking cheap
2
Britney 's performance can not be faulted
1
Lucy 's a dull girl that 's all
1
I admire it and yet can not recommend it because it overstays its natural running time
0
It 's a bad sign when you 're rooting for the film to hurry up and get to its subjects ' deaths just so the documentary will be over but it 's indicative of how uncompelling the movie is unless it happens to cover your particular area of interest
1
Stephen Earnhart 's documentary is a decomposition of healthy eccentric inspiration and ambition wearing a cloak of unsentimental straightforward text when it 's really an exercise in gross romanticization of the delusional personality type
0
A semiautobiographical film that 's so sloppily written and cast that you can not believe anyone more central to the creation of Bugsy than the caterer had anything to do with it
0
The movie barely makes sense with its unbelievable naïveté and arbitrary flashbacks
2
Pumpkin struts about with courage '' pinned to its huckster lapel while a yellow streak a mile wide decorates its back
0
Build some robots haul 'em to the theatre with you for the late show and put on your own Mystery Science Theatre tribute to what is almost certainly going to go down as the worst and only killer website movie of this or any other year
0
has about \/th the fun of its spry predecessor but it 's a rushed slapdash sequelforthesake ofasequel with less than half the plot and ingenuity
1
It 's tough to tell which is in more abundant supply in this woefully hackneyed movie directed by Scott Kalvert about street gangs and turf wars in Brooklyn stale cliches gratuitous violence or empty machismo
1
Gooding and Coburn are both Oscar winners a fact which as you watch them clumsily mugging their way through Snow Dogs seems inconceivable
1
At every opportunity to do something clever the film goes right over the edge and kills every sense of believability all you have left is a nosurprise series of explosions and violence while Banderas looks like he 's not trying to laugh at how bad it
0
pitiful slapdash disaster
0
A DOA dud from frame one
1
Jawdroppingly superficial straining to get by on humor that is not even as daring as John Ritter 's glory days on Three 's Company
3
There are plenty of scenes in Frida that do work but rarely do they involve the title character herself
1
Although God Is Great addresses interesting matters of identity and heritage it 's hard to shake the feeling that it was intended to be a different kind of film
2
The dark and bittersweet twist feels strange as things turn nasty and tragic during the final third of the film
1
Firsttimer John McKay is never able to pull it back on course
0
Distances you by throwing out so many red herrings so many false scares that the genuine ones barely register
1
Godard uses his characters if that 's not too glorified a term as art things mouthpieces visual motifs blanks
1
The movie generates plot points with a degree of randomness usually achieved only by lottery drawing
0
A predictable manipulative stinker
1
The story passes time until it 's time for an absurd finale of twisted metal fireballs and revenge
2
Eastwood winces clutches his chest and gasps for breath
3
It 's a spectacular performance ahem we hope it 's only acting
0
The movie suffers from two fatal ailments a dearth of vitality and a story that 's shapeless and uninflected
1
It 's just weirdness for the sake of weirdness and where Human Nature should be ingratiating it 's just grating
3
An ambitiously naturalistic albeit halfbaked drama about an abused innercity autistic teen
0
once she lets her love depraved leads meet LRB Denis ' RRB story becomes a hopeless unsatisfying muddle
2
The dose is strong and funny for the first minutes anyway after that the potency wanes dramatically
2
The people in ABC Africa are treated as docile mostly wordless ethnographic extras
1
What 's really sad is to see two Academy Award winning actresses LRB and one Academy Award winning actor RRB succumb to appearing in this junk that 's TV sitcom material at best
3
No doubt the star and everyone else involved had their hearts in the right place
1
Where their heads were is anyone 's guess
1
Call me a cynic but there 's something awfully deadly about any movie with a lifeaffirming message
0
A gratingly unfunny groaner littered with zerodimensional unlikable characters and hackneyed threadbare comic setups
3
Got some good organic character work lots of obvious political insights and little room for engaging imaginative filmmaking in its nearly  \/ hour dissipated length
1
A painfully slow clicheridden film filled with more holes than Clyde Barrow 's car