paupaiz commited on
Commit
30a75b2
1 Parent(s): b9837b3

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +90 -88
README.md CHANGED
@@ -6,136 +6,138 @@ license: mit
6
 
7
  <!-- Provide a quick summary of the dataset. -->
8
 
9
- This dataset card aims to be a base template for new datasets. It has been generated using [this raw template](https://github.com/huggingface/huggingface_hub/blob/main/src/huggingface_hub/templates/datasetcard_template.md?plain=1).
10
 
11
  ## Dataset Details
 
 
 
 
12
 
13
  ### Dataset Description
14
 
15
- <!-- Provide a longer summary of what this dataset is. -->
 
16
 
17
-
18
-
19
- - **Curated by:** [More Information Needed]
20
- - **Funded by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
21
- - **Shared by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
22
- - **Language(s) (NLP):** [More Information Needed]
23
- - **License:** [More Information Needed]
24
-
25
- ### Dataset Sources [optional]
26
 
27
  <!-- Provide the basic links for the dataset. -->
28
 
29
- - **Repository:** [More Information Needed]
30
- - **Paper [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
31
- - **Demo [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
32
 
33
  ## Uses
34
 
35
  <!-- Address questions around how the dataset is intended to be used. -->
36
-
37
- ### Direct Use
38
-
39
- <!-- This section describes suitable use cases for the dataset. -->
40
-
41
- [More Information Needed]
42
-
43
- ### Out-of-Scope Use
44
-
45
- <!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the dataset will not work well for. -->
46
-
47
- [More Information Needed]
48
 
49
  ## Dataset Structure
50
 
51
  <!-- This section provides a description of the dataset fields, and additional information about the dataset structure such as criteria used to create the splits, relationships between data points, etc. -->
52
 
53
- [More Information Needed]
 
54
 
55
  ## Dataset Creation
 
56
 
57
- ### Curation Rationale
58
 
59
- <!-- Motivation for the creation of this dataset. -->
60
 
61
- [More Information Needed]
62
 
63
- ### Source Data
 
64
 
65
- <!-- This section describes the source data (e.g. news text and headlines, social media posts, translated sentences, ...). -->
66
 
67
- #### Data Collection and Processing
68
 
69
- <!-- This section describes the data collection and processing process such as data selection criteria, filtering and normalization methods, tools and libraries used, etc. -->
70
 
71
- [More Information Needed]
72
 
73
- #### Who are the source data producers?
 
74
 
75
- <!-- This section describes the people or systems who originally created the data. It should also include self-reported demographic or identity information for the source data creators if this information is available. -->
76
 
77
- [More Information Needed]
78
 
79
- ### Annotations [optional]
 
80
 
81
- <!-- If the dataset contains annotations which are not part of the initial data collection, use this section to describe them. -->
 
 
82
 
83
  #### Annotation process
84
 
85
  <!-- This section describes the annotation process such as annotation tools used in the process, the amount of data annotated, annotation guidelines provided to the annotators, interannotator statistics, annotation validation, etc. -->
86
-
87
- [More Information Needed]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
88
 
89
  #### Who are the annotators?
90
 
91
  <!-- This section describes the people or systems who created the annotations. -->
92
 
93
- [More Information Needed]
94
-
95
- #### Personal and Sensitive Information
96
-
97
- <!-- State whether the dataset contains data that might be considered personal, sensitive, or private (e.g., data that reveals addresses, uniquely identifiable names or aliases, racial or ethnic origins, sexual orientations, religious beliefs, political opinions, financial or health data, etc.). If efforts were made to anonymize the data, describe the anonymization process. -->
98
-
99
- [More Information Needed]
100
-
101
- ## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
102
 
103
- <!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
104
-
105
- [More Information Needed]
106
-
107
- ### Recommendations
108
-
109
- <!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
110
-
111
- Users should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the dataset. More information needed for further recommendations.
112
-
113
- ## Citation [optional]
114
 
115
  <!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the dataset, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
116
-
117
- **BibTeX:**
118
-
119
- [More Information Needed]
120
-
121
- **APA:**
122
-
123
- [More Information Needed]
124
-
125
- ## Glossary [optional]
126
-
127
- <!-- If relevant, include terms and calculations in this section that can help readers understand the dataset or dataset card. -->
128
-
129
- [More Information Needed]
130
-
131
- ## More Information [optional]
132
-
133
- [More Information Needed]
134
-
135
- ## Dataset Card Authors [optional]
136
-
137
- [More Information Needed]
138
-
139
- ## Dataset Card Contact
140
-
141
- [More Information Needed]
 
6
 
7
  <!-- Provide a quick summary of the dataset. -->
8
 
9
+ Single-cell multiomics data collected from bone marrow mononuclear cells of 12 healthy human donors.
10
 
11
  ## Dataset Details
12
+ Multimodal data as a basis for benchmarking
13
+ "Developing machine learning methods for biological systems is complicated by the difficulty of obtaining ground truth. Typically, machine learning tasks rely on manual annotation (as in images or natural language queries), dynamic measurements (as in longitudinal health records or weather), or multimodal measurement (as in translation or text-to-speech). However, this is more complicated in the context of single-cell biology.
14
+ With single-cell data, annotation isn’t feasible. The data is noisy and not fully understood with descriptions of cell types evolving rapidly. Similarly, longitudinal measurement of all the RNA in a cell isn’t possible because the current measurement technologies involve destroying the cell. However, with multimodal single-cell data, we can now directly observe two layers of genetic information in the same cells. This provides an opportunity to use the fact these two sets of data were observed co-occurring in the same cells as ground truth. This is akin to the way that access to the same sentiment expressed in two languages provides ground truth for machine translation.
15
+ However, as these technologies are relatively new, most publicly available datasets are designed for exploration, not benchmarking. To set up a competition for multimodal single-cell data integration, we set out to create a fit-for-purpose benchmarking dataset."
16
 
17
  ### Dataset Description
18
 
19
+ - **Curated by:** Burkhardt DB, Lücken MD, Lance C, Cannoodt R, Pisco AO, Krishnaswamy S, Theis FJ, Bloom JM
20
+ - **License:** MIT
21
 
22
+ ### Dataset Sources
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
23
 
24
  <!-- Provide the basic links for the dataset. -->
25
 
26
+ - **Repository:** https://github.com/openproblems-bio
27
+ - **Paper:** https://datasets-benchmarks-proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2021/hash/158f3069a435b314a80bdcb024f8e422-Abstract-round2.html
 
28
 
29
  ## Uses
30
 
31
  <!-- Address questions around how the dataset is intended to be used. -->
32
+ Challenges included modality prediction, matching profiles from different modalities, and learning a joint embedding from multiple modalities.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
33
 
34
  ## Dataset Structure
35
 
36
  <!-- This section provides a description of the dataset fields, and additional information about the dataset structure such as criteria used to create the splits, relationships between data points, etc. -->
37
 
38
+ The training data is accessible in an AnnData h5ad file. More information can be found on AnnData objects here. You can load these files is to use the AnnData.read_h5ad() function.
39
+ The dataset was designed with a nested batch layout such that some donor samples were measured at multiple sites with some donors measured at a single site.
40
 
41
  ## Dataset Creation
42
+ Joint profiling of single-nucleus RNA and chromatin accessibility using the 10X Genomics Single Cell Multiome ATAC + Gene Expression Kit
43
 
44
+ #### Data Collection and Processing
45
 
46
+ <!-- This section describes the data collection and processing process such as data selection criteria, filtering and normalization methods, tools and libraries used, etc. -->
47
 
48
+ To facilitate exploring the data, each dataset has been preprocessed to remove low quality cells and doublets. The following sections detail this process for each data modality.
49
 
50
+ Preprocessing of gene expression (GEX)
51
+ In this dataset, gene expression was measured using 3’ capture of nuclear RNA as described in the 10X Multiome Product Guide. Note, not all RNA is found in the nucleus. Comparisons of nuclear and cytosolic RNA have been previously reported (e.g. Bakken 2018; Abdelmoez 2018) as have comparisons of single-nucleus and single-cell RNA sequencing (Lake 2017).
52
 
53
+ For gene expression data, cells were filtered based on mitochondrial content, UMI counts per cell, and genes detected per cell. Size factors were then calculated using scran and stored in adata.obs["size_factors"].
54
 
55
+ Counts were then normalized per cell by divided the UMI counts by the size factors. Original counts are stored in adata.layers["counts"]. The size factor normalized counts are stored in adata.X.
56
 
57
+ Finally, normalized counts are log1p transformed. These normalized counts are stores in adata.layers["log_norm"].
58
 
59
+ More information about best practices for single-cell analysis can be found here.
60
 
61
+ Preprocessing of ATAC
62
+ The chromatin accessibility data acquired by ATAC-seq as part of the 10X Multiome protocol was processed using Signac. Quality control, dimensionality reduction and translating peaks to gene activity scores was performed using Signac, following the authors’ instructions. After loading the peak-by-cell matrix, counts were binarized to only represent an accessible versus non-accessible state of each region. Cells were then filtered based on 5 quality control metrics comprising the total number of fragments, the enrichment of fragments detected at transcription start sites (TSS), the fraction of fragments in peak regions compared to peak-flanking regions, the fraction of peaks blacklisted by the ENCODE consortium, and the nucleosome signal, which describes the length distribution of fragments which is expected to follow the length of DNA required span across one nucleosome or multiples of it.
63
 
64
+ Since ATAC data is sparser than gene expression data, peaks were included if they were accessible in at least 15 cells.
65
 
66
+ Finally, the data was binarized by setting all values >0 to 1 and stored in adata.X. Raw UMI counts for each peak can be found in adata.layers["counts"].
67
 
68
+ Preprocessing of protein abundance (ADT)
69
+ The protein data was measured using the TotalSeq™-B Human Universal Cocktail, V1.0 of 134 cell surface markers and 6 isotype controls. The isotype controls are stored in adata.obsm["isotype_controls"]. These controls do not target any human proteins and their expression should be considered background.
70
 
71
+ The ADT protein measurements were run through quality control based on the total number of ADTs (ranging from 1100-1200 to 24000 across samples), the number of proteins captured in each cell (with a lower limit of 80) and the ADT count of the 6 isotype controls summed up in each cell (ranging from 1 to 100).
72
+
73
+ Since the total number of captured ADTs is limited, absolute ADT counts appear to be lower if highly abundant proteins are present. To account for this effect, normalization was performed using the centered log ratio (CLR) transformation. CLR counts are stored in adata.X and the raw counts are stored in adata.layers["counts"].
74
 
75
  #### Annotation process
76
 
77
  <!-- This section describes the annotation process such as annotation tools used in the process, the amount of data annotated, annotation guidelines provided to the annotators, interannotator statistics, annotation validation, etc. -->
78
+ Metadata
79
+ More information about the features are available in the .var and .obs DataFrames of each object.
80
+
81
+ Gene expression observation metadata
82
+ The GEX adata objects have the following columns:
83
+
84
+ .obs.index - The cell barcode for that observation with the batch label appended.
85
+ .obs["n_genes_by_counts"] - The number of genes with at least 1 count in a cell.
86
+ .obs["pct_counts_mt"] - Percent of UMI counts mapped to mitochondrial genes.
87
+ .obs["n_counts"] - Number of UMIs detected in the cell
88
+ .obs["n_genes"] - Number of genes detected in the cell
89
+ .obs["size_factors"] - The estimated size factor for the cell. See OSCA Ch. 7 - Normalization
90
+ .obs["phase"] - The cell cycle phase for each cell as calculated by scanpy.tl.score_genes_cell_cycle
91
+ .obs["leiden_final"] -
92
+ .obs["atac_ann"] - The cell type annotation of the cell from the joint ATAC data
93
+ .obs["cell_type"] - The cell type annotation of the cells from the GEX data
94
+ .obs["pseudotime_order_GEX"] - The diffusion pseudotime annotation for the developmental trajectories annotated in the data.
95
+ .obs["batch"] - The batch from which the cell was sampled. Format is s1d1 for Site 1 Donor 1.
96
+ For more info on how the QC metrics were calculated, consult scanpy.pp.calculate_qc_metrics
97
+
98
+ Gene expression feature metadata
99
+ The GEX adata.var DataFrames have the following columns:
100
+
101
+ .var.index - Ensembl Gene Names for each gene
102
+ .var["gene_ids"] - Ensembl Stable IDs used to uniquely track genes whose Gene Names may change over time.
103
+ .var["feature_types"] - Denotes the each feature as a gene expression feature. Should be GEX for all genes
104
+ .var["genome"] - The Genome Assembly used for read mapping.
105
+ .var["n_cells-[batch]"] - The number of cells in [batch] in which the gene was detected.
106
+ .var["highly_variable-[batch]"] - Whether the gene was determined to be highly variable in [batch]
107
+ ATAC observation metadata
108
+ The ATAC adata.obs DataFrames have the following columns:
109
+
110
+ .obs.index - The cell barcode for that observation with the batch label appended.
111
+ .obs["nCount_peaks"] - The number of peaks detected in the cell.
112
+ .obs["atac_fragments"] - Number of UMI counts in the cell (both in and not in peaks)
113
+ .obs["reads_in_peaks_frac"] - Fraction of UMIs in peaks
114
+ .obs["blacklist_fraction"] - Fraction of UMIs in Encode Blacklisted regions
115
+ .obs["nucleosome_signal"] - The nucleosome signal, which describes the length distribution of fragments which is expected to follow the length of DNA required span across one nucleosome or multiples of it
116
+ .obs["phase"] - The cell cycle phase for each cell as calculated by scanpy.tl.score_genes_cell_cycle
117
+ .obs["leiden_final"] -
118
+ .obs["rna_ann"] - The cell type annotation of the cell from the joint RNA data
119
+ .obs["cell_type"] - The cell type annotation of the cells from the ATAC data
120
+ .obs["pseudotime_order_ATAC"] - The diffusion pseudotime annotation for the developmental trajectories annotated in the data.
121
+ .obs["batch"] - The batch from which the cell was sampled. Format is s1d1 for Site 1 Donor 1.
122
+ For more info on how the QC metrics were calculated, consult the Signac documentation.
123
+
124
+ ATAC feature metadata
125
+ The ATAC adata.var DataFrames have the following columns:
126
+
127
+ .var.index - Genomic coordinates for each ATAC peak that are directly related to the reference genome, and include the chromosome name*, start position, and end position in the following format: chr1-1234570-1234870.
128
+ .var["feature_types"] - Denotes the each feature as a gene expression feature. Should be ATAC for all peaks
129
+ .var["n_cells-[batch]"] - The number of cells in [batch] in which the peak was detected.
130
+ *For the curious, chromosome names like KI270726.1 represent scaffold that are either unlocalized or unplaced (see Genome Assemblies from Ensembl)
131
+
132
+ There is also information about the observations in the .obs DataFrame of each AnnData object.
133
 
134
  #### Who are the annotators?
135
 
136
  <!-- This section describes the people or systems who created the annotations. -->
137
 
138
+ Burkhardt DB, Lücken MD, Lance C, Cannoodt R, Pisco AO, Krishnaswamy S, Theis FJ, Bloom JM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
139
 
140
+ ## Citation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
141
 
142
  <!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the dataset, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
143
+ https://datasets-benchmarks-proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2021/hash/158f3069a435b314a80bdcb024f8e422-Abstract-round2.html