dedup-isc-ft-v107-score
float64
0.32
1
uid
stringlengths
32
32
text
stringlengths
0
32.5k
paper_id
stringlengths
1
14
original_image_filename
stringlengths
5
222
0.438123
f8c24a847018493d805d4420e8f3e815
Ω(t_0)
2012.14776
mod3_w1-1000_cl-09_00.jpg
0.426944
ad6ea954064f4f92aab97805094570c1
Ω(t_15)
2012.14776
mod3_w1-1000_cl-09_15.jpg
0.439669
a6d379d50b2748b2b4b936a4c9033604
Ω(t_30)
2012.14776
mod3_w1-1000_cl-09_30.jpg
0.450998
9c9b0d0de0324fdc8c7c65312a9e9710
Ω(t_40)
2012.14776
mod3_w1-1000_cl-09_40.jpg
0.431058
c953c3ae570f4a0d9e0829ee8729208d
Model 3.
2012.14776
mod3_w1-1000_cl-09_40_3D.jpg
0.444819
13399ab1864b459a9f7db3fbec67e18f
Ω(t_0)
2012.14776
mod4_w1-100_cl-00_00.jpg
0.506225
253c6b2388f84c139d589d5eaee51345
Ω(t_15)
2012.14776
mod4_w1-100_cl-00_15.jpg
0.49392
df2d4e2bb2464ee79ea86aa817d8bb74
Ω(t_30)
2012.14776
mod4_w1-100_cl-00_30.jpg
0.494464
066c049a752c417d88765db36bca562d
Ω(t_40)
2012.14776
mod4_w1-100_cl-00_40.jpg
0.472695
453cebc4ede541dca1596b30f06a0206
Model 4.
2012.14776
mod4_w1-100_cl-00_40_3D.jpg
0.459017
ec96b5f7dc30417fb728646b22e679b6
Ω(t_0)
2012.14776
mod4_w1-100_cl-09_00.jpg
0.455763
632b33febde04e3c84ac19335317fe36
Ω(t_15)
2012.14776
mod4_w1-100_cl-09_15.jpg
0.475686
113ef1cb169b4370be1cd16921377ef1
Ω(t_30)
2012.14776
mod4_w1-100_cl-09_30.jpg
0.486568
5acc068801d640228539fdda416348db
Ω(t_40)
2012.14776
mod4_w1-100_cl-09_40.jpg
0.468366
7414fe59471b4ecfabdf53bd37c78631
Model 4.
2012.14776
mod4_w1-100_cl-09_40_3D.jpg
0.473761
269eaba7ad094f95880815fbc7e8fa2f
Interior flat surface that represent the cavity sequences.
2012.14776
soc_plane.jpg
0.38958
5b4b54f3ef9145a4b3507f923cc409cd
A Snapshot from MD simulations of a dense solution of M=50 ring polymers N=256 beads long within a box of size L=50 σ with periodic boundaries. B The dynamical entanglement analysis (DEA) proposed in this work probes the correlation between displacements Δr_i(t,t_0)=r_i(t_0+t)-r_i(t_0) and Δr_j(t,t_0)=r_j(t_0+t)-r_j(t_0) of two polymers i and j at lag-time t while recording their initial relative position r_ij(t_0)=r_j(t_0) -r_i(t_0). The correlation tensor H(t,r) (Eq. (<ref>)) encodes the propensity of two polymers at relative position r to display correlated motion at timescale t.
2012.14777
panel-4point-sketch.jpg
0.448607
191f980dc6334bbba409d9961d3c1df7
2D slice of the vector field v(t,r)= H(t,r) ·e_x for ring and linear polymers N=512 beads long at the lag-time (A-B) t = 10^4 τ_0 and (C-D) t = τ_R=τ_0 N^2 ≃ 26 10^4 τ_0. Note that the vectors are scaled up or down for visualisation purposes: (A) × 2.5 (B) × 20 (C) × 0.125 (D) × 1. The circles are drawn using the average size R_g of the polymers as radii and note that the plots are normalised by the size of the box, which is different for ring and linear systems (see Table I in SI).
2012.14777
panel1-new-new.jpg
0.455128
54f7bc0f6dfd4e99bc4640aa3f0b4e7a
Spatio-temporal evolution of dynamical cooperativity χ(t ,r/R_g). This figure shows the spatial profile of χ(t,r) at fixed lag-times: (A) t= 10^3 τ_0, (B) t =10^4 τ_0, (C) t= 0.1 τ_R= 0.1 τ_0 N^2 and (D) t= τ_R = τ_0 N^2. Notice that the lag-times in (C) and (D) are N dependent, hence the larger χ(t, r) values for longer chains. The maximum length-scale here is L/2 due to the periodic boundary conditions and is equivalent to 2R_g in our simulations.
2012.14777
panel2-chi4-NEW.jpg
0.417628
4a6fcca71f804c438fb84a486d0ffe9c
Spatial average of the dynamical correlation, Ξ(t), for (A) rings and (B) linear chains. The scaling for rings, ∼ t^2/7 and ∼ t^1/4 are obtained from Eq.(<ref>) with d_f=3 (crumpled globule) and d_f=5/2 (Cates-Deutsch crossover <cit.>, see SI), respectively. For linear chains our calculation agrees with the classical reptation picture which predicts Ξ(t)∼ t^1/2 (see Eq.(<ref>)).
2012.14777
panel3-Xe.jpg
0.47347
73c65a1cde28431a9185c0daff501d86
Displacement correlations display a topology-dependent behaviour. We compare χ(t,r) (Eq. (<ref>)) for (A) ring and (B) linear chains against time for increasing distances r/R_g and for fixed polymer length N=512. In the figure, τ_s represents the self-diffusion time of the polymers, i.e. g_3(τ_s)≡ R_g^2 (see SI for g_3(t) curves), τ_c = τ_0 N_e^-1/3N^7/3 the longest conformational relaxation time for rings and τ_R = τ_0 N^2 the Rouse time. Notice the non-monotonic behaviour of χ(t,r) at short length-scales that is peculiar for rings and indicating that the number of entanglements changes in time in systems of rings.
2012.14777
panel_chi4_vs_time_MAIN.jpg
0.461289
25215f4a19c146c8b38b6e69a159fdff
The sets of axioms E_ for semilattices (left), E_ for S-semimodules (right) and E_' for their distributivity (bottom).
2012.14778
cc_by_4-0.jpg
0.485239
ce017e24134e45988b85feb0b91353ac
The structure of our proposed model, which is based on Transformer structure. Our proposed masks are utilized in the Multi-Head Attention of Dialogue-Level Encoder and are illustrated for 3 types: (a)conventional, (b)Intra-Speaker and (c)Inter-Speaker masks. The fusing methods include Attention, (i)Add, and (ii)Concatenation.
2012.14781
ERC3.jpg
0.464139
d8f249c257424c2abbf74e42a6e023e8
The results of models with different blocks. wF1 for IEMOCAP; mF1 for MELD.
2012.14781
abl2.jpg
0.413524
7120bdfa3d11421a964fa3e8d645f2de
Heatmaps of attention from fusing method and self-attention of Intra-, Inter-Speaker Blocks for the targeted utterances (whose speakers are marked in yellow). Labels of utterances are tagged below the utterances. Predictions of TRMSM and TRM are marked in green for correctness and red for mistake.
2012.14781
case1.jpg
0.424671
da451e8901084078bb9d5c14425399a3
(a) illustrates a conversation clip of 3 speakers and the utterance in yellow frame is selected as a targeted utterance; (b) and (c) illustrate the relation graphs of u3, u4, u5 in different dependencies.
2012.14781
fig1.jpg
0.564717
ba0b0787033b4f60ab937525b057ab34
The F1 score on every emotion class by TRMSM-Att and TRM. (a)-(c) for IEMOCAP; (d)-(f) for MELD.
2012.14781
r1.jpg
0.389421
fff67fc3795c4c819d4ab3f95a5ec389
wF1 of TRMSM-Att and DialogueGCN with different ranges of context. all means using global context.
2012.14781
win2.jpg
0.454932
e992f95f07fb468e9e716f53c757b356
Concentration index (C) vs M_r for central galaxies (magenta circles) and satellites (cyan squares).
2012.14782
C_Mr.jpg
0.372225
3c005a81c2d4412a9cd1bc28db9a50cc
Examples of galaxy systems images with double interactions
2012.14782
dobe_int.jpg
0.456855
282595644d8a4286bf04e78ace787811
Examples of galaxy systems images with different classification: Systems without interaction (left),interaction between satellites (middle) and interaction with main galaxy (right). The inbox in middle panel shows a zoom to the interacting satellites.
2012.14782
example_2.jpg
0.43334
23fd7760b04346b7936b113406444280
Distribution of D_n(4000) spectral index and Log(SFR/M_*) for central galaxies in systems without interaction (red solid) and systems with interaction between satellites or with main galaxy (blue dotted) and control sample (shaded).
2012.14782
histdnSFR_c.jpg
0.416901
40892932e4f24038b02508ad54a35ebf
Distribution of D_n(4000) spectral index and Log(SFR/M_*) for satellite galaxies in systems without interaction (red solid) and systems with interaction between satellites or with main galaxy (blue dotted) and control sample (shaded).
2012.14782
histdnSFR_sat.jpg
0.494385
83462c8c997a48e58708f0e0e74f4ea5
Fraction of galaxies with M_u-M_r and M_g-M_r smaller than the median of the sample for central galaxies in systems without interaction (red solid) and systems with interaction between satellites or with main galaxy (blue dotted) and control sample (shaded).
2012.14782
rate_gr_ur_c.jpg
0.457223
c9335f2fcbb842ee95c57fd7a35b4078
Fraction of galaxies with Mu-Mr and Mg- Mr lower than the median of the sample for satellite galaxies in systems without interaction (red solid) and systems with interaction between satellites or with main galaxy (blue dotted) and control sample (shaded).
2012.14782
rate_gr_ur_s.jpg
0.470695
f5b1519dd6124602beff27f43902f35a
Fraction of galaxies with Log(SFR/M_*) higher and D_n(4000) lower than the median of the sample for central galaxies in systems without interaction (red solid) and systems with interaction between satellites or with main galaxy (blue dotted) and control sample (shaded).
2012.14782
ratesfr_dn_c.jpg
0.451712
f7f53fe51aa2440fa78ef1c8eb7e9c2e
Fraction of galaxies with Log(SFR/M_*) higher and D_n(4000) lower than the median of the sample for central galaxies in systems without interaction (red solid) and systems with interaction between satellites or with main galaxy (blue dotted) and control sample (shaded)
2012.14782
ratesfr_dn_s.jpg
0.487577
792f43e1c6284cd7aefa2dcfc557cc8e
Top: Left: Total star formation rate (SFR_c+SFR_1+SFR_2) as a function of total stellar mass (M^*_c+M^*_1+M^*_2) for systems of galaxies without interaction (solid) and systems with interaction between satellites or with main galaxy (dotted). Centre: Star formation rate SFR_c as a function of stellar mass M^*_c for central galaxies. Right: Total star formation rate (SFR_1+SFR_2) as a function of total stellar mass (M^*_1+M^*_2) for satellite galaxies. Bottom: same analysis for SFR normalised to M*.
2012.14782
sfr_mtotal_mc_ms1.jpg
0.423365
40802c3e0b8b47ebb75d13daf169a987
Visual examples of inaccurate segmentation. From left to right, it shows the timeframe, ground truth, prediction of the proposed approach, and the difference between ground truth and prediction. LV, MYO, and RV are marked in red, green, and blue, respectively.
2012.14785
bad.jpg
0.381012
d7e178b050f94905b0bcabf0a576e043
Visual examples of accurate segmentation. From left to right, each column shows the timeframe, ground truth, prediction of the proposed approach, and the difference between ground truth and prediction. LV, MYO, and RV are marked in red, green, and blue, respectively.
2012.14785
good.jpg
0.403767
bb6eb68cd0594c5a86a7e14793b7313f
Histogram distribution of MRI from different clinical centers. Center 1, center 2, and center 3 are marked in blue, orange, and green, respectively. Note that MRI scanners used in both center 2 and center 3 is from the same vendor, while that in center 1 is different.
2012.14785
hist.jpg
0.426387
5611af39b5c8477585bb4f8da21b8a82
The procedure of label propagation.
2012.14785
label.jpg
0.458392
74e59ae0a0344a45b84338238a938c11
The pipeline of our method.
2012.14785
overview.jpg
0.399734
4ac2d3e5d9e543d58a3fa528f201c0ab
Attention-based Deep Learning model for the detection of lexical stress errors.
2012.14788
architecture_new2.jpg
0.46595
76d8c13f18d2438895b166162bb1e1f7
Top: forced-alignment mapping between phonemes and frames for the word 'garage'. Middle: Frame-to-syllable attention weights matrix. Bottom: (Sub)Phoneme-to-syllable attention weights matrix.
2012.14788
garage_word_frame_and_phonene_level_atts.jpg
0.443014
ea73278d8f1d44edbed5ecd4acbb6dea
Precision-recall curves for evaluated systems.
2012.14788
precision_recall_plot.jpg
0.478364
38311cf6fa2d48419e2915cf407c02ed
2012.14790
ANAL_Gtasks_sprodic.jpg
0.483734
11b5963a9bc043be8b6743203c29fc9c
2012.14790
ANAL_enhance_polling.jpg
0.434663
887fae5c861e4071b1dd49fd5efbfa09
2012.14790
ANAL_off.jpg
0.447031
a350a2a02d2343848283d3ef7b0b814f
2012.14790
ANAL_on.jpg
0.479368
de6fad51b5394bf99e5f1d6ad42f9979
2012.14790
ANAL_period_poll.jpg
0.458486
2dfa180a15074bd3b895ce67ed0d84d4
Experimental and model results for a case study with a period of 50 ms at two ambient temperatures and workloads.
2012.14790
Case_Study_Whole_2.jpg
0.454995
7e906de7975a42f693869096c40b93f4
A generic periodic power signal.
2012.14790
Periodic_Power_Signal.jpg
0.450435
cfc8f748b53a4b1381647c843d750d16
Power signal of the cores for (a) case I: in-phase, and (b) case II: out-of-phase.
2012.14790
Theorem4_2.jpg
0.403421
2f04cdc18b9d4c0681977e9db268484a
Temperature profiles of in-phase and out-of-phase cases for a (a) two-core and (b) three-core system. (Blue lines represent the temperature of the cores in in-phase and other colors represent temperature of the cores in out-of-phase states.)
2012.14790
Theorem4_3.jpg
0.522092
b2ff4f034088456ead2eb8b7aea56e5d
Comparison of temperature (a) increase and (b) decrease between in-phase and out-of-phase cases.
2012.14790
Theorem4_4.jpg
0.447235
c6fc267dcd3c428490fd0294d3595594
Current, steady state, and average temperature profiles.
2012.14790
Theta.jpg
0.390173
65a94a0d133c4d04aa2599cb4047abdd
2012.14790
board_30period.jpg
0.407599
26f3cf8b951c418bb83e3b0eeb5698ca
2012.14790
board_serverutil.jpg
0.456124
5b978d9cf45c418896f706f5831f5108
2012.14790
board_serverutilization.jpg
0.426729
6446b079c01041069c99d586476a6210
2012.14790
busy_wait.jpg
0.388844
13cb5816fa654db08bf6753a582883af
2012.14790
cs_temp033.jpg
0.416611
88a4b784b25849ac9c6b159a57a09964
2012.14790
cs_temp100.jpg
0.447396
5e7ae8dd28e74747b2a43eb365d1cfe5
2012.14790
cs_time033.jpg
0.475562
505ccd365dd748bba130ea1d0fa90273
2012.14790
cs_time100.jpg
0.471256
f7b4029390184e308a769ccc44fd500d
2012.14790
def.jpg
0.460485
760e8164ec544d3da597d12e58114007
Experimental environment using furnace.
2012.14790
furnace2.jpg
0.496169
f5e130357c9a4535aced652bcca1a823
Task execution with a GPU segment.
2012.14790
gpu_mdl.jpg
0.513364
efe5808bfde349d39dc6fb9b92991343
Example of adjacency graph of a quad-core CPU.
2012.14790
graph1.jpg
0.434992
9b644b96542b4876af2084bcf1c3267c
Example of adjacency graph of a quad-core CPU.
2012.14790
graph3.jpg
0.517857
d99e6fc8502d45e7a78988178475287d
Final adjacency graph of a quad-core CPU.
2012.14790
graph4.jpg
0.474345
4b565ac6a653436084e534837fa01921
The worst-case scenario for CPU-GPU handover delay with a CPU polling server. When a GPU request with E_i is chosen from the GPU waiting queue for execution, it experiences the delay highlighted in blue boxes.
2012.14790
handover.jpg
0.480713
6c3c9b74afa3430f8aec414bbe635bb6
MSE of CPU cores from all setting in different cases.
2012.14790
mse_allcases.jpg
0.494664
c1a3602b7da949649e09b14de9312f34
2012.14790
nobusy_wait.jpg
0.500789
3a2cec9da9924403a86215b37f148d08
2012.14790
non-over.jpg
0.388616
287548d316cf4214bc4b5e8b3ce140b8
The maximum temperature of big cores in the Exynos 5422 captured by FLIR A325sc IR camera in the operating frequency of 1.4 GHz without heat sink.
2012.14790
observe_1400mhz.jpg
0.474542
e85ee543a50643f9b8b16c6d21633d3b
2012.14790
ovr.jpg
0.476293
266c6ff119264bbb922d57cee6fb2251
Search space for the idle server settings.
2012.14790
range.jpg
0.486375
c14287c2469144129022eec7a6b838ec
Parameter Estimation Scheme
2012.14790
scheme_new.jpg
0.434161
7b70a909eb384b8cacc5f398bce1350b
2012.14790
sprdc.jpg
0.582842
9e1df3e3bac14965bb916a2693a07d48
Workload execution pattern in the steady state.
2012.14790
theorem3.jpg
0.531492
e941ca30c0474fe2a53cf2e415dc56fa
Criticality mode change diagram
2012.14790
trans.jpg
0.398028
af5598fe9b2d470a9df6135c6dba1e60
Architecture of DAM3.
2012.14791
DAM3_Architecture_N3.jpg
0.386118
e5b9996b14fd4263af3d2cea341bc072
The IR of the memories of DAM3 compared with that of SAM-kNN on the Weather dataset.
2012.14791
IR_Weather_Final.jpg
0.393336
f74c5833e16543afbeb9a7d1d87a94b8
The number of removed and transferred instances from the LTM to WM and vice versa for DAM3, compared with the number of removed inconsistent instances from LTM for SAM-kNN, on the Weather dataset.
2012.14791
Memory_inconsistency_DAM3_SAMkNN5.jpg
0.473491
767581f38e5a4d349bc2d674a478e0e4
Critical difference diagram for the post-hoc Bonferroni-Dunn test.
2012.14791
cd_diagram4.jpg
0.431623
111af4a83c4a428fb18517ae96b317a7
The size of all memories with respect to the minority and majority classes for both models DAM3 and SAM-kNN, on the Weather dataset.
2012.14791
memory_size_Final2.jpg
0.469692
ff93884052fa4159ac7c3f279f3da8d0
Illustration of retroactive interference problem in a dual-memory model. (a) the red star instance is the most recent instance in the STM. Its neighborhood (indicated by the green dashed circle) is defined by the maximum distance of consistent instances (i.e., instances with the same class: red) in its neighborhood (k=5). (b) state of the LTM at t, the affected area (indicated by the green dashed circle) centered at the new point's location. (c) state of the LTM at t+1, where (the majority of) the previously stored instances have been removed due to inconsistency with the new information of the STM.
2012.14791
retroactive_interference_N2.jpg
0.467138
600c831d1c8c46d3b0c8cc24e97ad3a8
Resolving the retroactive interference using a working memory incorporated into a multi-memory model. (a) state of the STM at time point t; the red star point denotes the most recent instance in the STM. (b) state of the LTM and WM at time point t; there are four inconsistent instances in the LTM and four consistent instances in the WM. (c) consistent instances (in red) and inconsistent instances (in blue) with respect to the most recent instance. (d) state of the LTM and WM at the time point t+1; the inconsistent instances in the LTM are exchanged with the consistent instances in the WM.
2012.14791
three-m_model2.jpg
0.430509
fb4db91fdae54842860d739dcdaee9bd
trs partitioning of BQTerrace frame #4, computed with slice clustering.
2012.14792
Rect_clustering.jpg
0.408146
ed304a8e05ac4f9ab8452c21e2853a49
Proposed solution flowchart.
2012.14792
algo_flow.jpg
0.497829
5aa70da97d854da59889d0bfb35f55b5
Tiles combined with 4 rs. rs labeled from A to D.
2012.14792
slice_tile.jpg
0.500046
850b8757a8854c5282a74d5c5d62ee55
Grid of 4 tiles. Tiles labeled from 0 to 3
2012.14792
slice_tile_hevc.jpg
0.478719
80cc2d26579e4024a56167f9a634792a
Block diagram of the complete Variable Frame-Rate (VFR) coding scheme.
2012.14796
figure1.jpg
0.414956
3e0ee2d2005d49d1b4f20d8a072cf5de
Subjective test BTC structure for DSCQS evaluation method.
2012.14796
figure10.jpg
0.437588
e33903d008874991b2cc76cc67f314d0
Frame-rate decisions of the VFR algorithm for test set sequences.
2012.14796
figure11.jpg
0.417116
8235d8d5de714b72b6472de2d9b7e8c3
Mean Opinion Score values with 95% confidence intervals for test set sequences and subjectively tested frame-rates.
2012.14796
figure12.jpg
0.395595
42f5b37017234e7e957e253b0b45a3d4
Example of GOP structures of size 16 for a) source HFR 120 fps content and b) VFR with different frame-rates for each 4-frame chunk.
2012.14796
figure14.jpg
0.580068
4ea2fc159a8249cb96a59c8bd3437ac1
Overall prediction scheme with cascaded binary RF classifiers.
2012.14796
figure2.jpg
0.423885
560e74d0350e4ed7999df1359918d26f
Basic Test Cell (BTC) for the SDSCE evaluation method.
2012.14796
figure3.jpg