jackkuo commited on
Commit
07bffd2
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 2be9cbc

Add files using upload-large-folder tool

Browse files
This view is limited to 50 files because it contains too many changes.   See raw diff
Files changed (50) hide show
  1. 0NFIT4oBgHgl3EQf2ysh/content/tmp_files/2301.11378v1.pdf.txt +1298 -0
  2. 0NFIT4oBgHgl3EQf2ysh/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  3. 0dE2T4oBgHgl3EQfNAY2/content/tmp_files/2301.03730v1.pdf.txt +1402 -0
  4. 0dE2T4oBgHgl3EQfNAY2/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  5. 8NAyT4oBgHgl3EQfQvar/content/tmp_files/2301.00053v1.pdf.txt +1060 -0
  6. 8NAyT4oBgHgl3EQfQvar/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  7. 9NAyT4oBgHgl3EQf3Plu/content/tmp_files/2301.00765v1.pdf.txt +0 -0
  8. 9NAyT4oBgHgl3EQf3Plu/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  9. A9AzT4oBgHgl3EQfTPz-/content/tmp_files/2301.01248v1.pdf.txt +1421 -0
  10. A9AzT4oBgHgl3EQfTPz-/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  11. B9FAT4oBgHgl3EQfsh6e/content/tmp_files/2301.08659v1.pdf.txt +0 -0
  12. B9FAT4oBgHgl3EQfsh6e/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  13. BNAyT4oBgHgl3EQf4PoQ/content/tmp_files/2301.00781v1.pdf.txt +0 -0
  14. BNAyT4oBgHgl3EQf4PoQ/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  15. C9FRT4oBgHgl3EQfwjj-/content/tmp_files/2301.13639v1.pdf.txt +861 -0
  16. C9FRT4oBgHgl3EQfwjj-/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  17. CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/tmp_files/2301.02188v1.pdf.txt +251 -0
  18. CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +482 -0
  19. CtE0T4oBgHgl3EQfgQFr/content/tmp_files/2301.02415v1.pdf.txt +1457 -0
  20. CtE0T4oBgHgl3EQfgQFr/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  21. ENE0T4oBgHgl3EQfgwE0/content/tmp_files/2301.02421v1.pdf.txt +607 -0
  22. ENE0T4oBgHgl3EQfgwE0/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  23. FNE1T4oBgHgl3EQfWwTK/content/tmp_files/2301.03119v1.pdf.txt +1637 -0
  24. FNE1T4oBgHgl3EQfWwTK/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  25. FtAyT4oBgHgl3EQfSvdV/content/tmp_files/2301.00091v1.pdf.txt +1208 -0
  26. FtAyT4oBgHgl3EQfSvdV/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  27. INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/tmp_files/2301.03809v1.pdf.txt +617 -0
  28. INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +359 -0
  29. ItA0T4oBgHgl3EQfCP98/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  30. ItFAT4oBgHgl3EQfux4k/content/tmp_files/2301.08671v1.pdf.txt +2158 -0
  31. ItFAT4oBgHgl3EQfux4k/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  32. MNAzT4oBgHgl3EQfkf3z/content/tmp_files/2301.01534v1.pdf.txt +2225 -0
  33. MNAzT4oBgHgl3EQfkf3z/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  34. NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/tmp_files/2301.02685v1.pdf.txt +229 -0
  35. NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +151 -0
  36. P9E2T4oBgHgl3EQfVwcE/content/tmp_files/2301.03825v1.pdf.txt +2728 -0
  37. P9E2T4oBgHgl3EQfVwcE/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  38. P9FRT4oBgHgl3EQf6Tj7/content/tmp_files/2301.13676v1.pdf.txt +803 -0
  39. P9FRT4oBgHgl3EQf6Tj7/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  40. PNE4T4oBgHgl3EQfkQ1N/content/tmp_files/2301.05149v1.pdf.txt +1688 -0
  41. PNE4T4oBgHgl3EQfkQ1N/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  42. PdAzT4oBgHgl3EQfIvsJ/content/tmp_files/2301.01065v1.pdf.txt +1771 -0
  43. PdAzT4oBgHgl3EQfIvsJ/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  44. XdE1T4oBgHgl3EQfbwSy/content/tmp_files/2301.03177v1.pdf.txt +1908 -0
  45. XdE1T4oBgHgl3EQfbwSy/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  46. btFJT4oBgHgl3EQf9S1J/content/tmp_files/2301.11687v1.pdf.txt +3835 -0
  47. btFJT4oBgHgl3EQf9S1J/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  48. cdE2T4oBgHgl3EQfwgij/content/tmp_files/2301.04102v1.pdf.txt +1715 -0
  49. cdE2T4oBgHgl3EQfwgij/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt +0 -0
  50. htFMT4oBgHgl3EQf4DEU/content/tmp_files/2301.12450v1.pdf.txt +1882 -0
0NFIT4oBgHgl3EQf2ysh/content/tmp_files/2301.11378v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1298 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ MG-GNN: Multigrid Graph Neural Networks for Learning Multilevel Domain
2
+ Decomposition Methods
3
+ Ali Taghibakhshi 1 Nicolas Nytko 2 Tareq Uz Zaman 3 Scott MacLachlan 4 Luke N. Olson 2 Matt West 1
4
+ Abstract
5
+ Domain decomposition methods (DDMs) are pop-
6
+ ular solvers for discretized systems of partial dif-
7
+ ferential equations (PDEs), with one-level and
8
+ multilevel variants. These solvers rely on several
9
+ algorithmic and mathematical parameters, pre-
10
+ scribing overlap, subdomain boundary conditions,
11
+ and other properties of the DDM. While some
12
+ work has been done on optimizing these param-
13
+ eters, it has mostly focused on the one-level set-
14
+ ting or special cases such as structured-grid dis-
15
+ cretizations with regular subdomain construction.
16
+ In this paper, we propose multigrid graph neural
17
+ networks (MG-GNN), a novel GNN architecture
18
+ for learning optimized parameters in two-level
19
+ DDMs. We train MG-GNN using a new unsuper-
20
+ vised loss function, enabling effective training on
21
+ small problems that yields robust performance on
22
+ unstructured grids that are orders of magnitude
23
+ larger than those in the training set. We show
24
+ that MG-GNN outperforms popular hierarchical
25
+ graph network architectures for this optimization
26
+ and that our proposed loss function is critical to
27
+ achieving this improved performance.
28
+ 1. Introduction
29
+ Among numerical methods for solving the systems of equa-
30
+ tions obtained from discretization of partial differential equa-
31
+ tions (PDEs), domain decomposition methods (DDMs) are
32
+ a popular approach (Toselli & Widlund, 2005; Quarteroni
33
+ & Valli, 1999; Dolean et al., 2015). They have been exten-
34
+ sively studied and applied to elliptic boundary value prob-
35
+ lems, but are also considered for time-dependent problems.
36
+ 1Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Univer-
37
+ sity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 2Department of Computer
38
+ Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 3Scientific
39
+ Computing Program, Memorial University of Newfoundland
40
+ 4Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Memorial Univer-
41
+ sity of Newfoundland. Correspondence to: Ali Taghibakhshi
42
43
+ Schwarz methods are among the simplest and most popular
44
+ types of DDM, and map well to MPI-style parallelism, with
45
+ both one-level and multilevel variants. One-level methods
46
+ decompose the global problem into multiple subproblems
47
+ (subdomains), which are obtained either by discretizing
48
+ the same PDE over a physical subdomain or by projection
49
+ onto a discrete basis, using subproblem solutions to form a
50
+ preconditioner for the global problem. Classical Schwarz
51
+ methods generally consider Dirichlet or Neumann bound-
52
+ ary conditions between the subdomains, while Optimized
53
+ Schwarz methods (OSM) (Gander et al., 2000) consider
54
+ a combination of Dirichlet and Neumann boundary condi-
55
+ tions, known as Robin-type boundary conditions, to improve
56
+ the convergence of the method. Restricted additive Schwarz
57
+ (RAS) methods (Cai & Sarkis, 1999) are a common form
58
+ of Schwarz methods, and optimized versions of one-level
59
+ RAS has been theoretically studied by St-Cyr et al. (2007).
60
+ Two-level methods extend one-level approaches by adding
61
+ a (global) coarse-grid correction step to the preconditioner,
62
+ generally improving performance but at an added cost.
63
+ In recent years, there has been a growing focus on using
64
+ machine learning (ML) methods to learn optimized parame-
65
+ ters for iterative PDE solvers, including DDM and algebraic
66
+ multigrid (AMG). In Greenfeld et al. (2019) convolutional
67
+ neural networks (CNNs) are used to learn the interpola-
68
+ tion operator in AMG on structured problems, and in a
69
+ following study (Luz et al., 2020), graph neural networks
70
+ (GNNs) are used to extend the results to arbitrary unstruc-
71
+ tured grids. In a different fashion, reinforcement learning
72
+ methods along with GNNs are used to learn coarse-gird
73
+ selection in reduction-based AMG in Taghibakhshi et al.
74
+ (2021). As mentioned in Heinlein et al. (2021), when com-
75
+ bining ML methods with DDM, approaches can be catego-
76
+ rized into two main families, namely using ML within a clas-
77
+ sical DDM framework to obtain improved convergence and
78
+ using deep neural networks as the main solver or discretiza-
79
+ tion module for DDMs. In a recent study (Taghibakhshi
80
+ et al., 2022), GNNs are used to learn interface conditions
81
+ in optimized Schwarz DDMs that can be applied to many
82
+ subdomain problems, but their study is limited to one-level
83
+ solvers. Two-level domain decomposition methods often
84
+ converge significantly faster than one-level methods since
85
+ they include coarse-grid correction, but obtaining optimized
86
+ arXiv:2301.11378v1 [cs.LG] 26 Jan 2023
87
+
88
+ MG-GNN: Multigrid Graph Neural Networks for Learning Multilevel Domain Decomposition Methods
89
+ multilevel DDMs for general unstructured problems with
90
+ arbitrary subdomains remains an open challenge.
91
+ Graph neural networks (GNNs) extend learning based meth-
92
+ ods and convolution operators to unstructured data. Similar
93
+ to structured problems, such as computer vision tasks, many
94
+ graph-based problems require information sharing beyond
95
+ just a limited local neighborhood in a given graph. How-
96
+ ever, unlike in CNNs, where often deep CNNs are used with
97
+ residual skip connections to achieve long range information
98
+ passing, GNNs dramatically suffer depth limitations. Stack-
99
+ ing too many GNN layers results in oversmoothing, which
100
+ is due to close relation of graph convolution operators to
101
+ Laplacian smoothing (Li et al., 2018; Oono & Suzuki, 2019).
102
+ Oversmoothing essentially results in indistinguishable node
103
+ representations after too many GNN layers, due to informa-
104
+ tion aggregation in a large local neighborhood. Inspired by
105
+ the Unet architecture in CNNs (Ronneberger et al., 2015),
106
+ graph U-nets (Gao & Ji, 2019) were introduced as a rem-
107
+ edy for longe-range information sharing in graphs without
108
+ using too many GNN layers. Similar to their CNN counter-
109
+ parts, graph-Unet architectures apply down-sampling layers
110
+ (pooling) to aggregate node information to a coarser repre-
111
+ sentation of the problem with fewer nodes. This is followed
112
+ by up-sampling layers (unpooling, with the same number
113
+ of layers as pooling) to reconstruct finer representations of
114
+ the problem and allow information to flow back to the finer
115
+ levels from the coarser ones.
116
+ As mentioned in Ke et al. (2017), U-net and graph-Unet
117
+ architectures suffer from a handful of problems and non-
118
+ optimalities. In these architectures, scale and abstraction are
119
+ combined, meaning earlier, finer layers cannot access the in-
120
+ formation of the coarse layers. In other words, initial layers
121
+ learn deep features only based on a local neighborhood with-
122
+ out considering the larger picture of the problem. Moreover,
123
+ finer levels do not benefit from information updates until
124
+ the information flow reaches the coarsest level and flows
125
+ back to the finer levels. That is, the information flow has
126
+ to complete a full (graph) U-net cycle to update the finest
127
+ level information, which could potentially require multiple
128
+ conventional layers, leading to oversmoothing in the case of
129
+ graph U-nets. More recently, there has been similar hierar-
130
+ chical GNN architectures utilized for solving PDEs, such
131
+ as those proposed by Fortunato et al. (2022) and Li et al.
132
+ (2020). In each case, the architecture is similar to a U-net, in
133
+ terms in terms of information flow (from the finest to coars-
134
+ est graph and back), and there is no cross-scale information
135
+ sharing, making them prone to the aforementioned U-net
136
+ type problems.
137
+ To fully unlock the ability of GNNs to learn optimal DDM
138
+ operators, and to mitigate the shortcomings of graph U-
139
+ nets mentioned above, we introduce here a novel GNN
140
+ architecture, multigrid graph neural networks (MG-GNN).
141
+ MG-GNN information flow is parallel at all scales, mean-
142
+ ing every MG-GNN layer processes information from both
143
+ coarse and fine scale graphs. We employ this MG-GNN
144
+ architecture to advance DDM-based solvers by developing
145
+ a learning-based approach for two-level optimized Schwarz
146
+ methods. Specifically, we learn the Robin-type subdomain
147
+ boundary conditions needed in OSM as well as the overall
148
+ coarse-to-fine interpolation operator. We also develop a
149
+ novel loss function essential for achieving superior perfor-
150
+ mance compared to previous two-level optimized RAS. The
151
+ summary of contributions of this paper is as follows:
152
+ • Introduce a multigrid graph neural network (MG-
153
+ GNN) architecture that outperforms existing hierarchi-
154
+ cal GNN architectures and scales linearly with problem
155
+ size;
156
+ • Improve the loss function with theoretical guarantees
157
+ essential for training two-level Schwarz methods;
158
+ • Enforce scalability, leading to effective training on
159
+ small problems and generalization to problems that are
160
+ orders of magnitude larger; and
161
+ • Outperform classical two-level RAS, both as station-
162
+ ary algorithm and as a preconditioner for the flexible
163
+ generalized minimum residual (FGMRES) iteration.
164
+ 2. Background
165
+ In this section, we review one and two-level DDMs. Let Ω
166
+ be an open set in R2, and consider the Poisson equation:
167
+ −∆Φ = f,
168
+ (1)
169
+ where ∆ is the Laplace operator and f(x, y) and Φ(x, y)
170
+ are real-valued functions. Alongside (1), we consider inho-
171
+ mogeneous Dirichlet conditions on the boundary of Ω, ∂Ω,
172
+ and use a piecewise linear finite-element (FE) discretization
173
+ on arbitrary triangulations of Ω. In the linear FE discretiza-
174
+ tion, every node in the obtained graph corresponds to a
175
+ degree of freedom (DoF) in the discretization, and the set of
176
+ all nodes is denoted by D. The set D is decomposed into
177
+ S non-overlapping subdomains {D0
178
+ 1, D0
179
+ 2, . . . , D0
180
+ S} (where
181
+ the superscript in the notation indicates the amount of over-
182
+ lap; hence, the superscript zero for the non-overlapping
183
+ decomposition). The union of the subdomains covers the
184
+ set of all DoFs, D = ∪D0
185
+ i , so that each node in D is con-
186
+ tained in exactly one D0
187
+ i . Denote the restriction operator
188
+ for discrete DoFs onto those in D0
189
+ i by R0
190
+ i and the corre-
191
+ sponding extension from D0
192
+ i to D by (R0
193
+ i )T . Following
194
+ the FE discretization of problem, we obtain a linear system
195
+ to solve, Ax = b, where A is the global stiffness matrix.
196
+ For every D0
197
+ i , we obtain the subdomain stiffness matrix
198
+ as A0
199
+ i = R0
200
+ i A(R0
201
+ i )T . In the OSM setting, alternative def-
202
+ initions to this Galerkin projection for A0
203
+ i are possible as
204
+
205
+ MG-GNN: Multigrid Graph Neural Networks for Learning Multilevel Domain Decomposition Methods
206
+ noted below. To obtain the coarse-level representation of
207
+ the problem, let P ∈ RS×|D| be the piecewise-constant
208
+ interpolation operator that assigns every node in D0
209
+ i to the
210
+ i-th coarse node. The coarse-level operator is then obtained
211
+ as AC = P T AP.
212
+ The restricted additive Schwarz method (RAS) (Cai &
213
+ Sarkis, 1999) is an important extension to the Schwarz
214
+ methodology for the case of overlapping subdomains, where
215
+ some nodes in D belong to more than one subdomain. De-
216
+ noting the overlap amount by δ ∈ N, we define the sub-
217
+ domains Dδ
218
+ i for δ > 0 by recursion, as Dδ
219
+ i = Dδ−1
220
+ i
221
+
222
+ {j | akj ̸= 0 for k ∈ Dδ−1
223
+ i
224
+ }. For the coarse-grid interpo-
225
+ lation operator, P, each of the overlapping nodes is now
226
+ associated with multiple columns of P, which is typically
227
+ chosen as a partition of unity, with rows of P having equal
228
+ non-zero weights (that can be interpreted as the probability
229
+ of assigning a fine node to a given subdomain). The con-
230
+ ventional two-level RAS preconditioner is then defined by
231
+ considering the fine-level operator, MRAS, and the coarse-
232
+ level correction operator, C2-RAS, given by
233
+ MRAS =
234
+ S
235
+
236
+ i=1
237
+ ( ˜Rδ
238
+ i )T (Aδ
239
+ i )−1Rδ
240
+ i ,
241
+ (2)
242
+ C2-RAS = P(P T AP)−1P T ,
243
+ (3)
244
+ where Aδ
245
+ i = (Rδ
246
+ i )
247
+ T ARδ
248
+ i . The operator Rδ
249
+ i denotes restric-
250
+ tion for DoFs in D to those in Dδ
251
+ i while ˜Rδ
252
+ i is a modified
253
+ restriction from D to Dδ
254
+ i that takes nonzero values only for
255
+ DoFs in D0
256
+ i . The two-level RAS preconditioner is given
257
+ as M2-RAS = C2-RAS + MRAS − C2-RASAMRAS, with the
258
+ property that I − M2-RASA = (I − C2-RASA)(I − MRASA).
259
+ In the case of optimized Schwarz, the subdomain systems
260
+ (fine-level Aδ
261
+ i ) are modified by imposing a Robin bound-
262
+ ary condition between subdomains, writing ˜Aδ
263
+ i = Aδ
264
+ i + Li,
265
+ where Li is the term resulting from the Robin-type condi-
266
+ tion:
267
+ αu + ⃗n · ∇u = g(x),
268
+ (4)
269
+ where g denotes inhomogeneous data and ⃗n is the outward
270
+ unit normal to the boundary. The fine-level operator for
271
+ optimized Schwarz is then given by
272
+ MORAS =
273
+ S
274
+
275
+ i=1
276
+
277
+ ˜Rδ
278
+ i
279
+ �T �
280
+ ˜Aδ
281
+ i
282
+ �−1
283
+
284
+ i ,
285
+ (5)
286
+ where the choice of weight, α, in the subdomain Robin
287
+ boundary condition is a parameter for optimization. Simi-
288
+ larly, the method can be improved by optimizing the choice
289
+ of coarse-level interpolation operator, P, but this has not
290
+ been fully explored in the OSM literature. Similarly to
291
+ with RAS, we define the two-level ORAS preconditioner as
292
+ M2-ORAS = C2-RAS + MORAS − C2-RASAMORAS.
293
+ The work of Taghibakhshi et al. (2022) suggests a method
294
+ to learn Li for one-level ORAS. Here, we learn both Li
295
+ and P for two-level methods since, as later shown in Fig-
296
+ ure 7, the two-level methods are significantly more robust.
297
+ Furthermore, as we show in Section 5.2, while learning
298
+ both ingredients improves the performance, learning the
299
+ interpolation operator, P, is significantly more important
300
+ than learning Li’s in order to obtain a two-level solver that
301
+ outperforms classical two-level RAS.
302
+ 3. Multigrid graph neural network
303
+ The multigrid neural architecture (Ke et al., 2017) is an ar-
304
+ chitecture for CNNs that extracts higher level information in
305
+ an image more efficiently by cross-scale information shar-
306
+ ing, in contrast to other CNN architectures, such as U-nets,
307
+ where abstraction is combined with scale. That is, in one
308
+ multigrid layer, the information is passed between different
309
+ scales of the problem, removing the necessity of using deep
310
+ CNNs or having multilevel U-net architectures. Inspired
311
+ by Ke et al. (2017), we develop a multigrid architecture for
312
+ GNNs, enabling cross-scale message (information) passing
313
+ without making the GNN deeper; we call our architecture
314
+ Multigrid GNN, or MG-GNN. Figure 1 shows one layer of
315
+ the MG-GNN with two levels (a fine and a coarse level).
316
+ The input data to one layer of an MG-GNN has L different
317
+ graphs, from fine to coarse, denoted by G(ℓ) = (X(ℓ), A(ℓ)),
318
+ where A(ℓ) ∈ Rnℓ×nℓ and X(ℓ) ∈ Rnℓ×d are adjacency and
319
+ node feature matrices, respectively, and nℓ and d are the
320
+ number of nodes and node feature dimension in ℓ-th graph
321
+ for ℓ ∈ {0, 1, . . . , L − 1}, with ℓ = 0 denoting the finest
322
+ level. If the input graph does not have multiple levels, we
323
+ obtain the coarser levels recursively by considering a node
324
+ assignment matrix (clustering operator) R(ℓ) ∈ Rnℓ+1×nℓ,
325
+ for ℓ ∈ {0, 1, . . . , L − 2}:
326
+ X(ℓ+1) = R(ℓ)X(ℓ),
327
+ (6)
328
+ A(ℓ+1) = R(ℓ)A(ℓ)(R(ℓ))T .
329
+ (7)
330
+ We note that, in general, the assignment matrix Rℓ could
331
+ be any pooling/clustering operator, such as k-means clus-
332
+ tering, learnable pooling, etc. We denote R(ℓ→k) to be the
333
+ assignment matrix of graph level ℓ to level k (with ℓ < k),
334
+ which is constructed through R(ℓ→k) =
335
+ k−1
336
+
337
+ j=ℓ
338
+ R(j) (down-
339
+ sampling). To complement this terminology, we also define
340
+ R(k→ℓ) = (R(ℓ→k))T for ℓ > k (up-sampling), and for
341
+ the case of ℓ = k, the assignment matrix is simply the
342
+ identity matrix of dimension nℓ. The mathematical for-
343
+
344
+ MG-GNN: Multigrid Graph Neural Networks for Learning Multilevel Domain Decomposition Methods
345
+ 𝐶!
346
+ "
347
+ 𝐶#
348
+ "
349
+ 𝐶!
350
+ 𝐶#
351
+ Figure 1. One layer of MG-GNN. ci and c′
352
+ i denote the feature
353
+ dimensions of different levels before and after passing through an
354
+ MG-GNN layer, respectively.
355
+ malism of the m-th layer of the MG-GNN with L levels
356
+ is as follows: given all graphs feature matrices, X(ℓ)
357
+ m , for
358
+ ℓ ∈ {0, 1, . . . , L − 1}:
359
+ ˙Xℓ→k = F ℓ→k(X(ℓ)
360
+ m , X(k)
361
+ m , R(ℓ→k))
362
+ (8)
363
+ ˜X(ℓ)
364
+ m = [ ˙X0→ℓ∥ ˙X1→ℓ∥ . . . ∥ ˙Xk−1→ℓ]
365
+ (9)
366
+ X(ℓ)
367
+ m+1 = GNN(ℓ)( ˜X(ℓ)
368
+ m , A(ℓ))
369
+ (10)
370
+ where ∥ denotes concatenation, and GNN(ℓ) and F ℓ→ℓ
371
+ could be any homogeneous and heterogeneous GNNs, re-
372
+ spectively. For the case of ℓ ̸= k, we consider F ℓ→k to be
373
+ a heterogeneous message passing scheme between levels ℓ
374
+ and k, which is defined as follows. Consider any node v in
375
+ G(ℓ) and denote the row in X(ℓ)
376
+ m corresponding to the feature
377
+ vector of node v by xv. Then, F ℓ→k(X(ℓ)
378
+ m , X(k)
379
+ m , R(ℓ→k))
380
+ is given by
381
+ mv = gℓ→k
382
+
383
+
384
+ ω∈N (v)f ℓ→k(xv, xω, evω), xv
385
+
386
+ (11)
387
+ where evω is the feature vector of the edge (if any) connect-
388
+ ing v and ω, □ is any permutation invariant operator such
389
+ as sum, max, min, etc., and f ℓ→k and gℓ→k are learnable
390
+ multilayer perceptrons (MLPs). See Figure 2 for visualiza-
391
+ tion of up-sampling and down-sampling in MG-GNN. In
392
+ this study, we consider a two-level MG-GNN (see Figure 1)
393
+ and, for the clustering, we consider a k-means-based clus-
394
+ tering algorithm (best known as Lloyd’s algorithm) which
395
+ has O(n) time complexity and guarantees that every node
396
+ will be assigned to a subdomain (Bell, 2008; Lloyd, 1982))
397
+ in a connected graph. As mentioned earlier, the MG-GNN
398
+ architecture could alternatively use any pooling/clustering
399
+ method such as DiffPool (Ying et al., 2018), top-K pool-
400
+ ing (Gao & Ji, 2019), ASAP (Ranjan et al., 2020), SAG-
401
+ Pool (Lee et al., 2019), to name but a few. However, for
402
+ the case of this paper, since RAS (and therefore, ORAS)
403
+ necessitates every node in the fine grid be assigned to a
404
+ subdomain, we do not consider the aforementioned pooling
405
+ (clustering) methods.
406
+
407
+
408
+
409
+ Figure 2. Upsampling and downsampling in MG-GNN.
410
+ 4. Optimization problem and loss function
411
+ In this section, we denote the ℓ2 norm of a matrix or vector
412
+ by ∥ · ∥ and the spectral radius of matrix T by ρ(T). Our
413
+ objective is to minimize the asymptotic convergence factor
414
+ of the two-level ORAS method, defined as minimizing ρ(T),
415
+ where T = I−M2-ORASA = (I−C2-ORASA)(I−MORASA)
416
+ is the error propagation operator of the method. Since T
417
+ is not necessarily symmetric, ρ(T) is formally defined as
418
+ the extremal eigenvalue of T T T. As discussed in Wang
419
+ et al. (2019), numerical unsuitability of backpropagation
420
+ of an eigendecomposition makes it infeasible to directly
421
+ minimize ρ(T). To this end, Luz et al. (2020) relax the
422
+ spectral radius to the Frobenius norm (which is an upper
423
+ bound for it), and minimize that instead. However, for
424
+ the case of optimizing one-level DDM methods, the work
425
+ in Taghibakhshi et al. (2022) highlights that the Frobenius
426
+ norm is not a “tight” upper bound for ρ(T), and considers
427
+ minimizing a relaxation of ρ(T) inspired by Gelfand’s for-
428
+ mula, ∀K∈N
429
+ ρ(T) ≤ ∥T K∥
430
+ 1
431
+ K = supx:∥x∥=1(∥T Kx∥)
432
+ 1
433
+ K .
434
+ We present a modified version of the loss function intro-
435
+ duced by Taghibakhshi et al. (2022) and, in Section 5.3, we
436
+ show the necessity of this modification for improving the
437
+ two-level RAS results.
438
+ Consider the discretized problem with DoF set D of size
439
+ n, decomposed into S subdomains, Dδ
440
+ 1, Dδ
441
+ 2, . . . , Dδ
442
+ S with
443
+ overlap δ. The GNN takes D, its decomposition, and a
444
+ sparsity pattern for the interface values and that of the inter-
445
+ polation operator as inputs and its outputs are the learned
446
+ interface values and interpolation operator (see Appendix B
447
+ for more discussion on inputs and outputs of the network):
448
+ P (θ), L(θ)
449
+ 1 , L(θ)
450
+ 2 , . . . , L(θ)
451
+ S
452
+ ← ψ(θ)(D).
453
+ (12)
454
+ where ψθ denotes the GNN, and θ represents the learnable
455
+ parameters in the GNN.
456
+ We obtain the modified two-level ORAS (Optimized
457
+ Restricted Additive Schwarz) operator by using the
458
+ learned coarse grid correction operator, Cθ
459
+ 2-ORAS
460
+ =
461
+ P (θ) �
462
+ (P (θ))T AP (θ)�−1 �
463
+ P (θ)�T , and the fine grid oper-
464
+ ator, M (θ)
465
+ ORAS from (12). The associated 2-level error propa-
466
+
467
+ MG-GNN: Multigrid Graph Neural Networks for Learning Multilevel Domain Decomposition Methods
468
+ gation operator is then given by T (θ) = (I−C(θ)
469
+ 2-ORASA)(I−
470
+ M (θ)
471
+ ORASA).
472
+ In order to obtain an approximate measure of ρ(T (θ)) while
473
+ avoiding eigendecomposition of the error propagation ma-
474
+ trix, similar to Taghibakhshi et al. (2022), we use stochas-
475
+ tic sampling of
476
+ ���
477
+
478
+ T (θ)�K���, generated by the sample set
479
+ X ∈ Rn×m for some m ∈ N, given as
480
+ X = [x1, x2, . . . , xm], ∀j xj ∼ Rn uniformly, ∥xj∥ = 1,
481
+ (13)
482
+ where each xj is sampled uniformly randomly on a unit
483
+ sphere in Rn using the method introduced in Box (1958).
484
+ We then define
485
+ Y (θ)
486
+ K
487
+ =
488
+ �����
489
+
490
+ T (θ)�K
491
+ x1
492
+ ���� ,
493
+ ����
494
+
495
+ T (θ)�K
496
+ x2
497
+ ���� , . . . ,
498
+ ����
499
+
500
+ T (θ)�K
501
+ xm
502
+ ����
503
+
504
+ .
505
+ (14)
506
+ Note that
507
+ ���
508
+
509
+ T (θ)�K xj
510
+ ��� is a lower bound for
511
+ ���
512
+
513
+ T (θ)�K���.
514
+ Taghibakhshi et al. (2022) use L(θ) = max(Y (θ)
515
+ K ) as a
516
+ practical loss function. However, for large values of K, this
517
+ loss function suffers from vanishing gradients. Moreover,
518
+ as we show in Section 5.3, employing this loss function
519
+ results in inferior performance of the learned method in
520
+ comparison to two-level RAS. To overcome these issues,
521
+ we define Z(θ)
522
+ k
523
+ = max((Y (θ)
524
+ k
525
+ )
526
+ 1
527
+ k ) for 1 ≤ k ≤ K to arrive
528
+ at a new loss function,
529
+ L(θ) = ⟨softmax(Z(θ)), Z(θ)⟩ + γtr
530
+
531
+ (P (θ))T AP (θ)�
532
+ ,
533
+ (15)
534
+ where Z(θ) =
535
+
536
+ Z(θ)
537
+ 1 , Z(θ)
538
+ 2 , . . . , Z(θ)
539
+ K
540
+
541
+ , 0 < γ is an ad-
542
+ justable constant, and tr(M) is the trace of matrix M.
543
+ Adding the term tr((P (θ))T AP (θ)) is inspired by energy
544
+ minimization principles, to obtain optimal interpolation op-
545
+ erators in theoretical analysis of multilevel solvers (Xu,
546
+ 1992; Wan et al., 1999). In Section 5.3, we show the signifi-
547
+ cance of this term in the overall performance of our model.
548
+ Nevertheless, for the first part of the new loss function (15),
549
+ we prove that it convergence to the spectral radius of the er-
550
+ ror propagation matrix in a suitable limit. First, we include
551
+ two lemmas:
552
+ Lemma 1. For x, y ∈ R, with 0 ≤ y ≤ x and any K ∈ N,
553
+ x
554
+ 1
555
+ K − y
556
+ 1
557
+ K ≤ (x − y)
558
+ 1
559
+ K
560
+ Proof. See Lemma 3 from Taghibakhshi et al. (2022).
561
+ Lemma 2. For any nonzero square matrix T ∈ Rn×n,
562
+ k ∈ N, ϵ, ξ > 0, and 0 < δ < 1, there exists M ∈ N
563
+ such that for any m ≥ M, if we choose x1, x2, . . . , xm
564
+ uniformly random from {x ∈ Rn | ∥x∥ = 1}, and Z =
565
+ max{∥T kx1∥
566
+ 1
567
+ k , ∥T kx2∥
568
+ 1
569
+ k , . . . , ∥T kxm∥
570
+ 1
571
+ k } then, with a
572
+ probability of at least (1 − δ), the following hold:
573
+ 0 ≤ ∥T k∥
574
+ 1
575
+ k − Z ≤ ϵ,
576
+ (16)
577
+ ρ(T) − ξ ≤ Z.
578
+ (17)
579
+ Proof. The left side of the first inequality is achieved by
580
+ considering the definition of matrix norm, i.e. for any 1 ≤
581
+ i ≤ m, ∥T kxi∥ ≤
582
+ sup
583
+ ∥x∥=1
584
+ ∥T kx∥ = ∥T k∥, then taking
585
+ the kth root of both sides. For the right side of the first
586
+ inequality, consider the point x∗ ∈ {x ∈ Rn | ||x|| = 1}
587
+ such that ∥T kx∗∥ = sup
588
+ ∥x∥=1
589
+ ∥T kx∥ (such a point exists since
590
+ Rn is finite dimensional). Let S be the total volume of the
591
+ surface of an n dimensional unit sphere around the origin,
592
+ and denote by ˜S the volume on this surface within distance
593
+ ˜ϵ of the point x∗ in the ℓ2 measure, for ˜ϵ =
594
+ ϵ
595
+ ∥T k∥
596
+ 1
597
+ k . Let
598
+ m ≥ M1 >
599
+ log(δ)
600
+ log
601
+
602
+ 1− ˜
603
+ S
604
+ S
605
+ �, then, since 0 < δ < 1, we have:
606
+ P(∥x∗ − xi∥ > ˜ϵ, ∀i) =
607
+
608
+ 1 −
609
+ ˜S
610
+ S
611
+ �m
612
+ ≤ δ
613
+ (18)
614
+ Therefore, with probability of at least (1−δ), there is one xi
615
+ within the ˜ϵ neighborhood of x∗ on the unit sphere. Without
616
+ loss of generality, let x1 be that point. Using Lemma 1 and
617
+ the reverse triangle inequality, we have
618
+ ��T kx∗��
619
+ 1
620
+ k −
621
+ ��T kx1
622
+ ��
623
+ 1
624
+ k ≤
625
+ ���T kx∗�� −
626
+ ��T kx1
627
+ ��� 1
628
+ k
629
+
630
+ ��T k��
631
+ 1
632
+ k ∥x∗ − x1∥
633
+ 1
634
+ k ≤ ∥T k∥
635
+ 1
636
+ k ˜ϵ = ϵ
637
+ (19)
638
+ which finishes the proof for the right side of the first inequal-
639
+ ity.
640
+ For the second inequality, since ρ(T) ≤ ∥T k∥
641
+ 1
642
+ k , choose
643
+ M2 such that, with probability 1 − δ, (16) holds for ϵ =
644
+ ∥T k∥
645
+ 1
646
+ k − ρ(T) + ξ > 0. Rearranging (16) then yields (17)
647
+ for any m ≥ M = max{M1, M2}.
648
+ We next state the main result on optimality.
649
+ Theorem 3. For any nonzero matrix T, ϵ > 0, and
650
+ δ
651
+ <
652
+ 1, there exist M, K
653
+
654
+ N such that for any
655
+ m
656
+ >
657
+ M, if one chooses m points, xj, uniformly
658
+ at random from {x
659
+
660
+ Rn | ∥x∥
661
+ =
662
+ 1} and defines
663
+ Zk = max{∥T kx1∥
664
+ 1
665
+ k , ∥T kx2∥
666
+ 1
667
+ k , . . . , ∥T kxm∥
668
+ 1
669
+ k }, then
670
+ Z = (Z1, Z2, . . . , ZK) satisfies:
671
+ P (|⟨softmax(Z), Z⟩ − ρ(T)| ≤ ϵ) > 1 − δ.
672
+ (20)
673
+ Proof. Since
674
+ ρ(T)
675
+
676
+ ∥T k∥
677
+ 1
678
+ k
679
+ for
680
+ any
681
+ k
682
+ and
683
+ limk→∞ ∥T k∥
684
+ 1
685
+ k = ρ(T), for any 0 < α, there exists
686
+ K∗ ∈ N such that for any k > K∗, 0 ≤ ∥T k∥
687
+ 1
688
+ k −ρ(T) < α.
689
+
690
+ MG-GNN: Multigrid Graph Neural Networks for Learning Multilevel Domain Decomposition Methods
691
+ Take 0
692
+ <
693
+ α
694
+ <
695
+ min{ ϵ
696
+ 2, log( e−ϵ(ϵ+ρ(T ))
697
+ ϵ
698
+ 2 +ρ(T )
699
+ )}, let u
700
+ =
701
+ max{ max
702
+ 1≤k≤K∗{∥T k∥
703
+ 1
704
+ k }+α, ρ(T)+2α}, ˜δ = 1−(1−δ)
705
+ 1
706
+ K ,
707
+ and take K > max{
708
+ K∗(ueu−(ρ(T )+α)eρ(T )+α)
709
+ eρ(T )−ϵ(ϵ+ρ(T )−(ρ(T )+α)eα+ϵ), K∗}.
710
+ Note that, by the choice of α, we have ρ(T)+α < ρ(T)+ ϵ
711
+ 2
712
+ and eα+ϵ <
713
+ ρ(T )+ϵ
714
+ ρ(T )+ ϵ
715
+ 2 , which (along with the choice of u)
716
+ guarantees a positive K. By Lemma 2, for any 1 ≤ i ≤ K∗
717
+ and K∗ < j ≤ K, there exists ni, nj ∈ N such that:
718
+ P(ρ(T) − ϵ ≤ Zi ≤ u) > 1 − ˜δ
719
+ for m > ni,
720
+ (21)
721
+ P(ρ(T) − ϵ ≤ Zj ≤ ρ(T) + α) > 1 − ˜δ
722
+ for m > nj.
723
+ (22)
724
+ For any 1 ≤ k ≤ K, take nk independent points on unit
725
+ sphere so that the above inequalities are satisfied for all
726
+ k. Note that this can be achieved by taking M =
727
+ K
728
+
729
+ k=1
730
+ nk.
731
+ Since the points for satisfying equations (21) and (22) are
732
+ chosen independently, for any m > M, with probability of
733
+ at least
734
+ K�
735
+ k=1
736
+ (1 − ˜δ) = 1 − δ, we have ρ(T) − ϵ ≤ Zk for all
737
+ 1 ≤ k ≤ K. Consequently:
738
+ − ϵ =
739
+ (ρ(T) − ϵ)
740
+ K
741
+
742
+ i=1
743
+ eZi
744
+ K
745
+
746
+ i=1
747
+ eZi
748
+ − ρ(T) ≤
749
+ K
750
+
751
+ i=1
752
+ ZieZi
753
+ K
754
+
755
+ i=1
756
+ eZi
757
+ − ρ(T)
758
+ (23)
759
+ = ⟨softmax(Z), Z⟩ − ρ(T)
760
+ (24)
761
+ ≤ uK∗eu + (K − K∗)(ρ(T) + α)eρ(T )+α
762
+ Keρ(T )−ϵ
763
+ − ρ(T)
764
+ (25)
765
+ = K∗(ueu − (ρ(T) + α)eρ(T )+α)
766
+ Keρ(T )−ϵ
767
+ + (ρ(T) + α)eα+ϵ − ρ(T) ≤ ϵ,
768
+ (26)
769
+ where the last inequality is obtained by the choice of K.
770
+ In addition to these properties of the loss function, we now
771
+ show that obtaining the learned parameters using our MG-
772
+ GNN architecture scales linearly with the problem size.
773
+ Theorem 4. The time complexity to obtain the optimized
774
+ interface values and interpolation operator using our MG-
775
+ GNN is O(n), where n is the number of nodes in the grid.
776
+ Proof. Every in/cross-level graph convolution of the MG-
777
+ GNN has linear complexity. This must be the case when the
778
+ graph convolution is a message passing scheme due to the
779
+ sparsity in finite-element triangulations. For the case that
780
+ the graph convolution is a TAGConv layer, we have y =
781
+ �L
782
+ ℓ=1 Gℓxℓ + b1n, where xℓ ∈ Rn are the node features,
783
+ L is the node feature dimension, b is a learnable bias, and
784
+ Gℓ ∈ Rn×n is the graph filter. In TAGConv layers, the
785
+ graph filter is given as Gℓ = �J
786
+ j=0 gℓ,jM j, where M is
787
+ the adjacency matrix, J is a constant, and gℓ,j are the filter
788
+ polynomial coefficients. In other words, the graph filter it
789
+ is a polynomial in the adjacency matrix M of the graph.
790
+ Moreover, the matrix M is sparse, hence obtaining M j has
791
+ O(n) computation cost, resulting in full TAGConv O(n)
792
+ time complexity. Moreover, for both the interface value
793
+ head and the interpolation head of the network, the cost of
794
+ calculating edge feature and the feature networks are O(n),
795
+ resulting in overall O(n) cost of MG-GNN.
796
+ 5. Experiments
797
+ 5.1. Training
798
+ We train each model on 1000 grids of sizes ranging from
799
+ 800–1000 nodes. The grids are generated randomly as a
800
+ convex polygon and using PyGMSH (Schl¨omer, 2021) for
801
+ meshing its interior. The subdomains are generated using
802
+ Lloyd clustering on the graph (Bell, 2008), the subdomain
803
+ overlap is set to one, and the weights of the edges along
804
+ the boundary determine the interface value operators, L(θ)
805
+ i .
806
+ As shown in the interpolation head of the network in Ap-
807
+ pendix B Figure 11, the weight of the edges connecting the
808
+ coarse and fine grids determine the interpolation operator.
809
+ In our case, the edges between the coarse and fine grids
810
+ connect every fine node to the coarse node corresponding to
811
+ its own subdomain and its neighboring subdomains. Alter-
812
+ natively, every fine node could connect only to the coarse
813
+ node corresponding to its subdomain but, as we discuss in
814
+ Section 5.3, this significantly impacts the performance of
815
+ the model. Moreover, each row of the interpolation operator,
816
+ P (θ), is scaled to have sum of one, as would be the case
817
+ for classical interpolation operators. Figure 3 shows several
818
+ example training grids.
819
+ The model is trained for 20 epochs with batch size of 10
820
+ using the ADAM optimizer (Kingma & Ba, 2014) with a
821
+ fixed learning rate of 5 × 10−4. For the full discussion on
822
+ model architecture, see Appendix B and Figure 11. For the
823
+ loss function parameters introduced in Section 4, we use
824
+ K = 10 iterations and m = 100 samples. We developed
825
+ our code1 using PyAMG (Bell et al., 2022), NetworkX (Hag-
826
+ berg et al., 2008), and PyTorch Geometric (Fey & Lenssen,
827
+ 2019). All training is executed on an i9 Macbook Pro CPU
828
+ with 8 cores. In the training procedure, we aim to mini-
829
+ mize the convergence of the stationary algorithm and, as
830
+ described in Section 4, we develop a loss function to achieve
831
+ this goal by numerically minimizing the spectral radius of
832
+ 1All code and data for this paper is at https://github.
833
+ com/JRD971000/Code-Multilevel-MLORAS/ (MIT li-
834
+ censed).
835
+
836
+ MG-GNN: Multigrid Graph Neural Networks for Learning Multilevel Domain Decomposition Methods
837
+ Figure 3. Training grid examples with about 1k nodes.
838
+ Figure 4. Test grid example with about 7.4k nodes.
839
+ the error propagation matrix. In practice, optimized RAS
840
+ methods are often used as preconditioners for Krylov meth-
841
+ ods such as FGMRES; as shown in Appendix A, the trained
842
+ models using this procedure also outperform other baselines
843
+ when used as preconditioners for FGMRES. Directly train-
844
+ ing to minimize FGMRES iterations would require using
845
+ FGMRES in the training loop and backpropagation through
846
+ sparse-sparse matrix multiplication (Nytko et al., 2022),
847
+ which is left for future studies.
848
+ We evaluate the model on test grids that are generated in
849
+ the same fashion as the training grids, but are larger in size,
850
+ ranging from 800 to 60k DoFs. An example of a test grid is
851
+ shown in Figure 4.
852
+ 5.2. Interface values and interpolation operator
853
+ As mentioned in the Section 4, to optimize two-level RAS,
854
+ one could optimize the parameters in the interface condi-
855
+ tions (2) and/or the interpolation operator (3). For one-level
856
+ RAS, on the other hand, there is no interpolation operator
857
+ (since there is no coarse grid), leaving only the interface
858
+ values to optimize, as was explored in Taghibakhshi et al.
859
+ (2022) and St-Cyr et al. (2007). To compare the importance
860
+ of these two ingredients in the two-level RAS optimization,
861
+ we compare three different models. Each of these models
862
+ is trained as described in Section 5.1; however, one of the
863
+ models (labeled “interface”) is trained by only learning the
864
+ interface values (ignoring the interpolation head of the net-
865
+ work), and using classical RAS interpolation to construct
866
+ T (θ). Another model, which we label “interpolation”, only
867
+ learns the interpolation operator weights, and uses zeros for
868
+ interface matrices L(θ)
869
+ i
870
+ to construct T (θ). The other model
871
+ uses both training heads (see Figure 11), learning the inter-
872
+ 103
873
+ 104
874
+ Grid size
875
+ 25
876
+ 50
877
+ 75
878
+ 100
879
+ 125
880
+ Stationary iterations
881
+ Interface
882
+ RAS
883
+ Interpolation
884
+ Ours (both)
885
+ Figure 5. Effect of learning interface values, interpolation operator,
886
+ or both on stationary iterations.
887
+ face values and the interpolation operator. We compare the
888
+ performance of these models with classical RAS in Figure 5
889
+ as a stationary algorithm, and in Figure 9 as a preconditioner
890
+ for a Krylov method, FGMRES.
891
+ The results show that learning the interpolation operator is
892
+ more important in optimizing the 2-level RAS. Intuitively,
893
+ the coarse-grid correction process in (3) plays an important
894
+ role in scaling performance to large problems, due to its
895
+ global coupling of the discrete DOFs. The interpolation
896
+ operator is critical in achieving effective coarse-grid cor-
897
+ rection. On the other hand, the interface values are local
898
+ modifications to the subdomains (see (2)), that cannot (by
899
+ themselves) make up for a poor coarse-grid correction pro-
900
+ cess. Learning both operators clearly results in the best
901
+ performance in Figures 5 and 9, where the interpolation
902
+ operator can be adapted to best complement the effects of
903
+ the learned interface values.
904
+ 5.3. Loss function and sparsity variants
905
+ We first compare five variants of our method with the RAS
906
+ baseline, as shown in Figures 6 and 9. The main model
907
+ is trained as described in Section 5.1 with the loss func-
908
+ tion from Section 4. All but one of the variants only dif-
909
+ fer in their loss function, and share the rest of the details.
910
+ The variant labeled “Max loss” is trained with the loss
911
+ function from Taghibakhshi et al. (2022). The variant la-
912
+ beled “Max+Trace loss” is trained with the loss function
913
+ from Taghibakhshi et al. (2022) plus the γtr(P T AP) term.
914
+ Similarly, the variant labeled “Softmax loss” is trained by re-
915
+ moving the γtr(P T AP) part from the loss function in (15).
916
+ For the last variant, we restrict the sparsity of the interpola-
917
+ tion operator to that obtained by only connecting every fine
918
+ node to its corresponding coarse node, labelled “DDM stan-
919
+ dard sparsity”, and trained using the loss function from (15).
920
+
921
+ MG-GNN: Multigrid Graph Neural Networks for Learning Multilevel Domain Decomposition Methods
922
+ RAS
923
+ Softmax+Trace loss (ours)
924
+ Max loss
925
+ Max+Trace loss
926
+ Softmax loss
927
+ DDM standard sparsity
928
+ 40
929
+ 60
930
+ 80
931
+ Avg stationary iterations
932
+ Figure 6. Effect of every ingredient in the model on average station-
933
+ ary iterations. All three variants outperforming the RAS baseline
934
+ are utilizing modifications introduced in this paper (see (15)) com-
935
+ pared to the “Max loss” from Taghibakhshi et al. (2022).
936
+ As shown in Figure 6, the learned operator using this variant
937
+ achieves worse performance than the baseline RAS. This
938
+ is partly because, for this variant, the constraint on unit row
939
+ sums of the interpolation operator effectively removes most
940
+ of the learned values, since many rows of interpolation have
941
+ only one nonzero entry in this sparsity pattern.
942
+ To show the effectiveness of the coarse-grid correction and
943
+ the learned operator, we also compare two-level RAS and
944
+ our two-level learned RAS (MLORAS 2-level) with one-
945
+ level RAS and one-level optimized RAS from Taghibakhshi
946
+ et al. (2022) in Figures 7 and 10.
947
+ 5.4. Comparison to Graph U-net and number of layers
948
+ In this section, the performance of Graph U-net and MG-
949
+ GNN with different numbers of layers is studied. Figures 8
950
+ and 10 show the performance of each of the models as
951
+ stationary iterations and preconditioners for FGMRES, re-
952
+ spectively. For a fair comparison, the MG-GNN and graph
953
+ U-nets that share the same number of layers also have the
954
+ same number of trainable parameters. As shown here, the
955
+ best performance is achieved with 4 layers of MG-GNN, and
956
+ MG-GNN strictly outperforms the graph U-net architecture
957
+ with the same number of layers.
958
+ 6. Conclusion
959
+ In this study, we proposed a novel graph neural network
960
+ architecture, which we call multigrid graph neural network
961
+ (MG-GNN), to learn two-level optimized restricted additive
962
+ Schwarz (optimized RAS or ORAS) preconditioners. This
963
+ 103
964
+ 104
965
+ Grid size
966
+ 102
967
+ 103
968
+ Stationary iterations
969
+ RAS 1-level
970
+ MLORAS 1-level
971
+ RAS 2-level
972
+ MLORAS 2-level (ours)
973
+ Figure 7. Comparison of stationary iterations of 2-level methods
974
+ with 1-level methods from Taghibakhshi et al. (2022).
975
+ 2
976
+ 4
977
+ 6
978
+ 8
979
+ Number of layers
980
+ 45
981
+ 50
982
+ 55
983
+ Avg stationary iterations
984
+ Graph U-net
985
+ MG-GNN (ours)
986
+ Figure 8. Average stationary iterations of graph U-net and MG-
987
+ GNN with different number of layers on the test set.
988
+ new MG-GNN ensures cross-scale information sharing at
989
+ every layer, eliminating the need to use multiple graph con-
990
+ volutions for long range information passing, which was a
991
+ shortcoming of prior graph network architectures. More-
992
+ over, MG-GNN scales linearly with problem size, enabling
993
+ its use for large graph problems. We also introduce a novel
994
+ unsupervised loss function, which is essential to obtain im-
995
+ proved results compared to classical two-level RAS. We
996
+ train our method using relatively small graphs, but we test
997
+ it on graphs which are orders of magnitude larger than the
998
+ training set, and we show our method consistently outper-
999
+ forms the classical approach, both as a stationary algorithm
1000
+ and as an FGMRES preconditioner.
1001
+ References
1002
+ Bell, N., Olson, L. N., and Schroder, J.
1003
+ PyAMG: Al-
1004
+ gebraic multigrid solvers in python. Journal of Open
1005
+ Source Software, 7(72):4142, 2022.
1006
+ doi: 10.21105/
1007
+
1008
+ MG-GNN: Multigrid Graph Neural Networks for Learning Multilevel Domain Decomposition Methods
1009
+ joss.04142. URL https://doi.org/10.21105/
1010
+ joss.04142. (code is MIT licensed).
1011
+ Bell, W. N. Algebraic multigrid for discrete differential
1012
+ forms.
1013
+ PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-
1014
+ Champaign, 2008.
1015
+ Box, G. E. A note on the generation of random normal
1016
+ deviates. Ann. Math. Statist., 29:610–611, 1958.
1017
+ Cai, X.-C. and Sarkis, M. A restricted additive Schwarz
1018
+ preconditioner for general sparse linear systems. SIAM
1019
+ Journal on Scientific Computing, 21(2):792–797, 1999.
1020
+ Dolean, V., Jolivet, P., and Nataf, F.
1021
+ An introduction
1022
+ to domain decomposition methods. Society for Indus-
1023
+ trial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia,
1024
+ PA, 2015. ISBN 978-1-611974-05-8. doi: 10.1137/1.
1025
+ 9781611974065.ch1.
1026
+ Du, J., Zhang, S., Wu, G., Moura, J. M., and Kar, S.
1027
+ Topology adaptive graph convolutional networks. arXiv
1028
+ preprint arXiv:1710.10370, 2017.
1029
+ Fey, M. and Lenssen, J. E. Fast graph representation learning
1030
+ with PyTorch Geometric. In ICLR Workshop on Represen-
1031
+ tation Learning on Graphs and Manifolds, 2019. (code
1032
+ is MIT licensed).
1033
+ Fortunato, M., Pfaff, T., Wirnsberger, P., Pritzel, A., and
1034
+ Battaglia, P. Multiscale meshgraphnets. arXiv preprint
1035
+ arXiv:2210.00612, 2022.
1036
+ Gander, M., Halpern, L., and Nataf, F. Optimized Schwarz
1037
+ methods. In Proceedings of the 12th International Con-
1038
+ ference on Domain Decomposition, pp. 15–27. ddm.org,
1039
+ 2000.
1040
+ Gao, H. and Ji, S. Graph u-nets. In ICML, pp. 2083–2092.
1041
+ PMLR, 2019.
1042
+ Greenfeld, D., Galun, M., Basri, R., Yavneh, I., and Kim-
1043
+ mel, R. Learning to optimize multigrid PDE solvers.
1044
+ In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.
1045
+ 2415–2423. PMLR, 2019.
1046
+ Hagberg, A., Swart, P., and S Chult, D. Exploring net-
1047
+ work structure, dynamics, and function using networkx.
1048
+ Technical report, Los Alamos National Lab.(LANL), Los
1049
+ Alamos, NM (United States), 2008. (code is BSD li-
1050
+ censed).
1051
+ Heinlein, A., Klawonn, A., Lanser, M., and Weber, J. Com-
1052
+ bining machine learning and domain decomposition meth-
1053
+ ods for the solution of partial differential equations—a
1054
+ review. GAMM-Mitteilungen, 44(1):e202100001, 2021.
1055
+ Ke, T.-W., Maire, M., and Yu, S. X. Multigrid neural archi-
1056
+ tectures. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Com-
1057
+ puter Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 6665–6673,
1058
+ 2017.
1059
+ Kingma, D. P. and Ba, J. Adam: A method for stochastic
1060
+ optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
1061
+ Lee, J., Lee, I., and Kang, J. Self-attention graph pooling.
1062
+ In ICML, pp. 3734–3743. PMLR, 2019.
1063
+ Li, Q., Han, Z., and Wu, X.-M. Deeper insights into graph
1064
+ convolutional networks for semi-supervised learning. In
1065
+ AAAI, 2018.
1066
+ Li, Z., Kovachki, N., Azizzadenesheli, K., Liu, B., Stuart,
1067
+ A., Bhattacharya, K., and Anandkumar, A. Multipole
1068
+ graph neural operator for parametric partial differential
1069
+ equations. Advances in Neural Information Processing
1070
+ Systems, 33:6755–6766, 2020.
1071
+ Lloyd, S. Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Trans-
1072
+ actions on Information Theory, 28(2):129–137, 1982.
1073
+ Luz, I., Galun, M., Maron, H., Basri, R., and Yavneh, I.
1074
+ Learning algebraic multigrid using graph neural networks.
1075
+ In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.
1076
+ 6489–6499. PMLR, 2020.
1077
+ Nytko, N., Taghibakhshi, A., Zaman, T. U., MacLachlan,
1078
+ S., Olson, L. N., and West, M. Optimized sparse matrix
1079
+ operations for reverse mode automatic differentiation.
1080
+ arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.05159, 2022.
1081
+ Oono, K. and Suzuki, T. Graph neural networks exponen-
1082
+ tially lose expressive power for node classification. arXiv
1083
+ preprint arXiv:1905.10947, 2019.
1084
+ Quarteroni, A. and Valli, A. Domain decomposition methods
1085
+ for partial differential equations. Numerical Mathematics
1086
+ and Scientific Computation. The Clarendon Press, Oxford
1087
+ University Press, New York, 1999. ISBN 0-19-850178-1.
1088
+ Oxford Science Publications.
1089
+ Ranjan, E., Sanyal, S., and Talukdar, P. Asap: Adaptive
1090
+ structure aware pooling for learning hierarchical graph
1091
+ representations. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference
1092
+ on Artificial Intelligence, volume 34, pp. 5470–5477,
1093
+ 2020.
1094
+ Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T. U-net: Con-
1095
+ volutional networks for biomedical image segmentation.
1096
+ In International Conference on Medical Image Comput-
1097
+ ing and Computer Assisted Intervention, pp. 234–241.
1098
+ Springer, 2015.
1099
+ Schl¨omer, N. pygmsh: A Python frontend for Gmsh, 2021.
1100
+ URL https://github.com/nschloe/pygmsh.
1101
+ (GPL-3.0 License).
1102
+
1103
+ MG-GNN: Multigrid Graph Neural Networks for Learning Multilevel Domain Decomposition Methods
1104
+ St-Cyr, A., Gander, M. J., and Thomas, S. J. Optimized
1105
+ multiplicative, additive, and restricted additive Schwarz
1106
+ preconditioning. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing,
1107
+ 29(6):2402–2425, 2007.
1108
+ Taghibakhshi, A., MacLachlan, S., Olson, L., and West, M.
1109
+ Optimization-based algebraic multigrid coarsening using
1110
+ reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information
1111
+ Processing Systems, 34, 2021.
1112
+ Taghibakhshi, A., Nytko, N., Zaman, T., MacLachlan,
1113
+ S., Olson, L., and West, M. Learning interface condi-
1114
+ tions in domain decomposition solvers. arXiv preprint
1115
+ arXiv:2205.09833, 2022.
1116
+ Toselli, A. and Widlund, O.
1117
+ Domain decomposition
1118
+ methods—algorithms and theory, volume 34 of Springer
1119
+ Series in Computational Mathematics. Springer-Verlag,
1120
+ Berlin, 2005.
1121
+ ISBN 3-540-20696-5.
1122
+ doi: 10.1007/
1123
+ b137868.
1124
+ Wan, W. L., Chan, T. F., and Smith, B.
1125
+ An energy-
1126
+ minimizing interpolation for robust multigrid methods.
1127
+ SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 21(4):1632–1649,
1128
+ 1999.
1129
+ Wang, W., Dang, Z., Hu, Y., Fua, P., and Salzmann, M.
1130
+ Backpropagation-friendly eigendecomposition. Advances
1131
+ in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019.
1132
+ Xu, J. Iterative methods by space decomposition and sub-
1133
+ space correction. SIAM Review, 34(4):581–613, 1992.
1134
+ Ying, Z., You, J., Morris, C., Ren, X., Hamilton, W., and
1135
+ Leskovec, J. Hierarchical graph representation learning
1136
+ with differentiable pooling. Advances in Neural informa-
1137
+ tion processing systems, 31, 2018.
1138
+
1139
+ MG-GNN: Multigrid Graph Neural Networks for Learning Multilevel Domain Decomposition Methods
1140
+ A. FGMRES plots
1141
+ In Section 5, in Figures 5 to Figure 8, the performance of the methods was evaluated by considering the convergence
1142
+ of stationary iterations. Here, we present another possible evaluation criterion, assessing the number of iterations to
1143
+ convergence for the preconditioned systems using FGMRES, a standard Krylov method. The following figures are analogous
1144
+ to those provided in the main paper, and demonstrate that our method also achieves superior results compared to other
1145
+ methods, and that the MG-GNN architecture outperforms graph U-nets.
1146
+ 103
1147
+ 104
1148
+ Grid size
1149
+ 30
1150
+ 40
1151
+ 50
1152
+ FGMRES iterations
1153
+ Interface
1154
+ RAS
1155
+ Interpolation
1156
+ Ours (both)
1157
+ RAS
1158
+ Softmax+Trace loss (ours)
1159
+ Max loss
1160
+ Max+Trace loss
1161
+ Softmax loss
1162
+ DDM standard sparsity
1163
+ 30.0
1164
+ 32.5
1165
+ 35.0
1166
+ 37.5
1167
+ 40.0
1168
+ 42.5
1169
+ 45.0
1170
+ Avg FGMRES iterations
1171
+ Figure 9. Left: Effect of learning interface values, interpolation operator, or both on FGMRES iterations. All three variants outperforming
1172
+ the RAS baseline are utilizing modifications introduced in this paper (15) compared to the “Max loss” from Taghibakhshi et al. (2022).
1173
+ Right: Effect of every ingredient in the model on average FGMRES iterations.
1174
+ 103
1175
+ 104
1176
+ Grid size
1177
+ 50
1178
+ 100
1179
+ 150
1180
+ FGMRES iterations
1181
+ RAS 1-level
1182
+ MLORAS 1-level
1183
+ RAS 2-level
1184
+ MLORAS 2-level (ours)
1185
+ 2
1186
+ 4
1187
+ 6
1188
+ 8
1189
+ Number of layers
1190
+ 35.5
1191
+ 36.0
1192
+ 36.5
1193
+ 37.0
1194
+ 37.5
1195
+ 38.0
1196
+ Avg FGMRES iterations
1197
+ Graph U-net
1198
+ MG-GNN (ours)
1199
+ Figure 10. Left: Comparison of FGMRES iterations of 2-level methods with 1-level methods from Taghibakhshi et al. (2022). Right:
1200
+ Average FGMRES iterations of graph U-net and MG-GNN with different number of layers on the test set.
1201
+
1202
+ MG-GNN: Multigrid Graph Neural Networks for Learning Multilevel Domain Decomposition Methods
1203
+ B. Model architecture
1204
+ Inputs and outputs:
1205
+ The model takes any unstructured grid as its input, which consists of the node features, edge features,
1206
+ and adjacency matrix of both the fine and coarse grids. Every node on the fine level has a binary feature, indicating whether
1207
+ it lies on the boundary of a subdomain. Fine level edge features are obtained from the discretization of the underlying PDE,
1208
+ A, and the adjacency matrix of the fine level is simply the sparsity of A. Similar attributes for the coarse level are obtained
1209
+ as described in Section 3, Equations (6) and (7), and Lloyd aggregation has been used for obtaining subdomains throughout.
1210
+ The outputs of the model are the learned interface values and the interpolation operator.
1211
+ We use node and edge preprocessing (3 fully connected layers of dimension 128, followed by ReLU activations, in the
1212
+ node and feature space, respectively) followed by 4 layers of MG-GNN. For GNN(ℓ) in (10) and F ℓ→ℓ in (8), we use a
1213
+ TAGConv layer (Du et al., 2017) and, for F ℓ→k with ℓ ̸= k, we use a heterogeneous message passing GNN as shown in
1214
+ Equation (11). Specifically, we choose summation as the permutation invariant operator in (11) and, for the MLPs, we use
1215
+ two fully connected layers of size 128 with ReLU nonlinearity for f ℓ→k and gℓ→k(x, y) = x.
1216
+ Following the MG-GNN layers, the network will split in two heads, each having a stack layer (which essentially concatenates
1217
+ the features of nodes on each side of every edge) and an edge feature post-processing (see Figure 12 for details). The edge
1218
+ weights between the coarse and fine level are the learned interpolation operator weights, and the edge values along the
1219
+ subdomains in the fine level are the learned interface values. The upper head of the network has a masking block at the end,
1220
+ which masks the edge values that are not along the boundary, hence only outputting the learned interface values. The overall
1221
+ GNN architecture for learning the interpolation operator and the interface values is shown in Figure 11.
1222
+ Edge Feature Post-
1223
+ processing
1224
+ Learned interface
1225
+ edges
1226
+ Dnode : Node features
1227
+ Dedge : Edge features
1228
+ Masking
1229
+ Stack
1230
+ MG-GNN
1231
+ MG-GNN
1232
+ 4 Blocks
1233
+ Edge Feature Pre-
1234
+ processing
1235
+ Coarse Grid
1236
+ Fine Grid
1237
+ Edge Feature Post-
1238
+ processing
1239
+ Learned interpolation
1240
+ weights
1241
+ Stack
1242
+ Edge feature flow
1243
+ Edge feature
1244
+ Fine node feature
1245
+ Edge
1246
+ Fine node
1247
+ Node feature flow
1248
+ Coarse node
1249
+ Coarse node feature
1250
+ Node Feature Pre-
1251
+ processing
1252
+ Figure 11. GNN architecture used in this study.
1253
+
1254
+ MG-GNN: Multigrid Graph Neural Networks for Learning Multilevel Domain Decomposition Methods
1255
+ ����������������
1256
+ ����
1257
+ ����
1258
+ ����
1259
+ ����
1260
+ ����
1261
+ ���������
1262
+ ��������
1263
+ �������
1264
+ �������
1265
+ �������
1266
+ ������
1267
+ ���������������
1268
+ �������������
1269
+ Edge Feature
1270
+ Postprocessing
1271
+ Learned interface
1272
+ edges
1273
+ Dnode : Node features
1274
+ Dedge : Edge features
1275
+ Masking
1276
+ Stack
1277
+ HGNN
1278
+ HGNN
1279
+ 4 Blocks
1280
+ Edge Feature
1281
+ Preprocessing
1282
+ Coarse Grid
1283
+ Fine Grid
1284
+ Edge Feature
1285
+ Postprocessing
1286
+ Learned interpolation
1287
+ weights
1288
+ Stack
1289
+ Edge feature flow
1290
+ Edge feature
1291
+ Fine node feature
1292
+ Edge
1293
+ Fine node
1294
+ Node feature flow
1295
+ Coarse node
1296
+ Coarse node feature
1297
+ Figure 12. Edge feature post-processing block.
1298
+
0NFIT4oBgHgl3EQf2ysh/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
0dE2T4oBgHgl3EQfNAY2/content/tmp_files/2301.03730v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1402 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Learning to Perceive in Deep Model-Free Reinforcement
2
+ Learning
3
+ Gonçalo Querido
4
+ Instituto Superior Técnico
5
+ Lisbon, Portugal
6
7
+ Alberto Sardinha
8
+ INESC-ID & Instituto Superior
9
+ Técnico & PUC-Rio
10
+ Lisbon, Portugal
11
12
+ Francisco Melo
13
+ INESC-ID & Instituto Superior
14
+ Técnico
15
+ Lisbon, Portugal
16
17
+ ABSTRACT
18
+ This work proposes a novel model-free Reinforcement Learning
19
+ (RL) agent that is able to learn how to complete an unknown task
20
+ having access to only a part of the input observation. We take inspi-
21
+ ration from the concepts of visual attention and active perception
22
+ that are characteristic of humans and tried to apply them to our
23
+ agent, creating a hard attention mechanism. In this mechanism,
24
+ the model decides first which region of the input image it should
25
+ look at, and only after that it has access to the pixels of that region.
26
+ Current RL agents do not follow this principle and we have not
27
+ seen these mechanisms applied to the same purpose as this work.
28
+ In our architecture, we adapt an existing model called recurrent
29
+ attention model (RAM) and combine it with the proximal policy op-
30
+ timization (PPO) algorithm. We investigate whether a model with
31
+ these characteristics is capable of achieving similar performance
32
+ to state-of-the-art model-free RL agents that access the full input
33
+ observation. This analysis is made in two Atari games, Pong and
34
+ SpaceInvaders, which have a discrete action space, and in CarRac-
35
+ ing, which has a continuous action space. Besides assessing its
36
+ performance, we also analyze the movement of the attention of
37
+ our model and compare it with what would be an example of the
38
+ human behavior. Even with such visual limitation, we show that
39
+ our model matches the performance of PPO+LSTM in two of the
40
+ three games tested.
41
+ KEYWORDS
42
+ Reinforcement Learning, Model-Free, Attention Mechanism, Hard
43
+ Attention, Active Perception, Visual Attention
44
+ 1
45
+ INTRODUCTION
46
+ In our everyday lives, even though we are constantly being flooded
47
+ with visual stimuli, we do not give the same importance to ev-
48
+ erything in our field of view. Instead, we focus on small regions
49
+ that attract us the most. In those moments, we take advantage of a
50
+ cognitive process called visual attention [4]. Unconsciously, we in-
51
+ terpret those regions and extract meaning from them using another
52
+ mental process named perception [15]. The combination of both
53
+ these processes allows us to solve complex tasks because, from all
54
+ the visual information we receive, we filter the most important to
55
+ perform our activities and not pay attention to irrelevant elements
56
+ in our surroundings.
57
+ Current Reinforcement Learning (RL) models, even though they
58
+ achieve excellent performance in a broad range of tasks, do not
59
+ follow this behavior typical of humans. For example, when learning
60
+ to play a video game, RL algorithms typically process the whole
61
+ input image, giving the same importance to every region of the
62
+ input game frame. Such design results in models that rely on large
63
+ convolutional neural networks (CNNs) that process a large number
64
+ of pixels, making the model take too long to train, requiring high
65
+ computational power, and potentially limiting their applicability [8].
66
+ To keep the training time reasonable, images are often preprocessed
67
+ to reduce the size of the input, losing some of its details. Using these
68
+ low-resolution images can hamper the models from completely
69
+ understanding what is present in their input, which lowers their
70
+ performance [19].
71
+ To overcome these limitations, in this paper we contribute the
72
+ first RL architecture that implements an attention mechanism sim-
73
+ ilar to the one humans have. Applying such a mechanism allows
74
+ the model to only process the pixels it perceives as the most useful,
75
+ which makes it much more computationally efficient and able to
76
+ use the original images without resizing them.
77
+ Attention mechanisms such as the one described above recently
78
+ started appearing in the literature, but none of them were applied to
79
+ the same purpose as this work. The closest to our work is, perhaps,
80
+ the model proposed by Mnih et al., called recurrent attention model
81
+ (RAM) [12], which implements the same attention mechanism we
82
+ use in our work in the context of image classification. The authors
83
+ introduce the concept of glimpse, a retina-like representation of a
84
+ portion of an image centered around a location 𝑙. The region of the
85
+ image around 𝑙 has high resolution; regions further away from 𝑙
86
+ have increasingly lower resolution. Such representation is crucial
87
+ to the performance of the agent and is what makes the complexity
88
+ of the model not dependent on the size of the input images. Instead,
89
+ it depends on the size of the glimpses. The RAM paper uses four
90
+ networks: one responsible for extracting the glimpses from an im-
91
+ age and learning features from them; a Long Short Term Memory
92
+ (LSTM) network that builds an internal representation of the envi-
93
+ ronment combining the information from all the previous glimpses;
94
+ one network responsible for the classification of the image received,
95
+ and another that chooses the coordinates of the next glimpse.
96
+ There is also a number of other models that apply different types
97
+ of attention mechanisms. For example, the work of Tang et al. [18]
98
+ is an example of an RL agent that is capable of achieving top perfor-
99
+ mance in games such as CarRacing [9] and DoomTakeCover [14].
100
+ Their agent starts by dividing the input video frame into patches,
101
+ assigning a level of importance to each one of them. Then, it selects
102
+ the 𝐾 most important patches and extracts features from them. This
103
+ information is later used by a controller which selects the actions to
104
+ take. Although this model only has around 3600 parameters, since
105
+ it is trained using a computational intensive evolutionary strategy
106
+ called Covariance-Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES),
107
+ it takes a long time to train.
108
+ arXiv:2301.03730v1 [cs.LG] 10 Jan 2023
109
+
110
+ In this paper, we address the following research questions:
111
+ (1) Is it possible to attain state-of-the-art performance in com-
112
+ plex control tasks with limited (but active) perception?
113
+ (2) Is there any similarity between the attention movements of
114
+ the model and human behavior?
115
+ To address these questions, the paper proposes a novel architecture
116
+ that combines a glimpse-based attention mechanism with a model-
117
+ free reinforcement learning algorithm (PPO). Our results show our
118
+ model can match the performance of PPO+LSTM in two of the
119
+ three games tested while processing a significantly smaller number
120
+ of pixels from the input images. Our model has fewer training
121
+ parameters than its vanilla counterparts and is, therefore, more
122
+ efficient than existing models that apply attention mechanisms.
123
+ In the remainder of this paper, we go over the modifications we
124
+ have made to the RAM [12] architecture, showing how our model
125
+ compares against multiple versions of the PPO algorithm when
126
+ playing video games such as Pong, SpaceInvaders, and CarRacing.
127
+ In the end, we analyze the movement of the attention of our model
128
+ and compare it with what would be an example of human behavior.
129
+ 2
130
+ BACKGROUND
131
+ This section introduces the core concepts and notation used in the
132
+ remainder of the document.
133
+ 2.1
134
+ Active Perception and Attention
135
+ The concept of active perception was defined by Bajcsy as the intel-
136
+ ligent acquisition of information about an environment in order to
137
+ understand it better [2]. In comparison to a passive perception agent
138
+ that statically senses its environment and takes actions accordingly,
139
+ an active perception agent can improve its performance by actively
140
+ moving its sensors to better reason about its environment [10].
141
+ In artificial intelligence, active perception models can be imple-
142
+ mented using deep learning methods such as CNNs [10]. Since the
143
+ selection of what an agent should sense can take inspiration from
144
+ the human visual attention process, an attention mechanism can
145
+ be used to replicate such behavior. In machine learning, attention
146
+ is a technique that consists in choosing which parts of the input
147
+ are the most important, resulting in more computational power
148
+ being allocated to them. In the literature [6, 20, 21], we can find
149
+ two categories of attention mechanisms:
150
+ • Soft attention: is a mechanism that splits the input into
151
+ multiple parts, assigning a weight to each one of them. The
152
+ weights represent the importance associated with each por-
153
+ tion of the image, and since this model is differentiable, they
154
+ can be updated using backpropagation.
155
+ • Hard attention: is a mechanism where the model does
156
+ not go through some parts of its input because the neu-
157
+ ral network itself stochastically decides which are the parts
158
+ it should pay attention to. However, this mechanism is not
159
+ differentiable but can be trained using RL.
160
+ The model from Tang et al. [18] used a soft attention mechanism,
161
+ while in our work, we use a hard attention mechanism.
162
+ 2.2
163
+ Reinforcement Learning
164
+ In RL, an agent interacts with its environment and learns, by trial
165
+ and error, an action-selection rule (a policy) that maximizes the
166
+ agent’s reward over time.
167
+ In our problem, the agent does not have full observability of
168
+ the environment, so the best mathematical framework to formally
169
+ represent this problem is a Partially Observable Markov Decision
170
+ Process (POMDP). A POMDP is defined as a tuple (S, A, Z, P, O,𝑟),
171
+ where S is a discrete set of states, A is a discrete set of actions,
172
+ Z is a discrete set of observations, P(𝑠′ | 𝑠,𝑎) represents the tran-
173
+ sition probability of going from state 𝑠 to 𝑠′ performing action 𝑎,
174
+ O(𝑧 | 𝑠′,𝑎) represent the probability of receiving the observation 𝑧,
175
+ while being in state 𝑠′ after taking action 𝑎, and 𝑟 (𝑠,𝑎) is the reward
176
+ function 𝑟 : S × A → R.
177
+ In our work, we decided to propose a model-free RL architecture
178
+ instead of a model-based. We did not choose the latter because
179
+ we decided to understand first if an RL model was capable of hav-
180
+ ing good performance with such visual restriction while having
181
+ a simpler, model-free approach. Building a complete model of the
182
+ environment while just seeing a region of it, is another challenge
183
+ that we leave for future work. Since we made that decision, our
184
+ agent is not able to know either the transition probabilities P or
185
+ the reward function 𝑟 of the environment. Therefore, it has to learn,
186
+ explicitly by trial and error, the optimal policy 𝜋 : H → Δ(A),
187
+ which is a mapping from the history of past observations to a dis-
188
+ tribution over actions. One way of learning that policy is using an
189
+ actor-critic policy-gradient method. This algorithm learns a param-
190
+ eterized policy (an actor) and estimates a value function (a critic).
191
+ For our problem, we need two actors: one to learn the action policy
192
+ 𝜋𝜃 (𝑎 | 𝑧) (Actor), and the other to learn the policy 𝜋𝜇 (𝑙 | 𝑧) that
193
+ chooses the coordinates of the image to look at (Locator).
194
+ The specific actor-critic method used in this work was the PPO
195
+ algorithm, presented by Schulman et al. [17]. PPO is simpler than
196
+ other policy gradient methods, well-studied, and was already tried
197
+ alongside the RAM architecture [22]. For these reasons, we decided
198
+ to have it as the base of our model.
199
+ In PPO, we alternate between interacting with the environment
200
+ to get data and updating the policy using stochastic gradient ascent.
201
+ In every policy update, this policy gradient method guarantees that
202
+ the difference between the new policy and the old policy is small,
203
+ which prevents the algorithm from having a high variance during
204
+ training. Having the probability ratio
205
+ 𝑟𝑡 (𝜃) = 𝜋𝜃 (𝑎𝑡 | 𝑠𝑡)
206
+ 𝜋𝜃old (𝑎𝑡 | 𝑠𝑡)
207
+ (1)
208
+ and ˆ𝐴𝑡, an estimator of the advantage function at timestep 𝑡,
209
+ PPO maximizes the following surrogate objective:
210
+ 𝐿𝐶𝐿𝐼𝑃 (𝜃) = ˆE𝑡
211
+
212
+ min(𝑟𝑡 (𝜃) ˆ𝐴𝑡, clip(𝑟𝑡 (𝜃), 1 − 𝜖, 1 + 𝜖) ˆ𝐴𝑡)
213
+
214
+ (2)
215
+ where 𝜖 is a hyperparameter. The clipping prevents large policy
216
+ updates and penalizes the probability ratio 𝑟𝑡 (𝜃) when it tries to
217
+ move far away from 1.
218
+ 2
219
+
220
+ 3
221
+ GLIMPSE-BASED ACTOR-CRITIC (GBAC)
222
+ In this section, we introduce a novel model called Glimpse-Based
223
+ Actor-Critic (GBAC) that combines a hard attention mechanism
224
+ with a model-free RL algorithm. When compared to other RL mod-
225
+ els, GBAC processes much fewer pixels, and its training parameters
226
+ do not depend on the size of the input, which makes it more effi-
227
+ cient.
228
+ In our problem, the game environment 𝐸 gives, at each timestep,
229
+ a frame 𝑠𝑡 of the game. Since our model cannot have access to
230
+ all the information of 𝑠𝑡, it has to select only a portion of it to
231
+ be its observation 𝑧𝑡. That observation has the coordinates 𝑙𝑡−1 =
232
+ (𝑥𝑡−1,𝑦𝑡−1) that were chosen by the model in the previous timestep.
233
+ During its interaction with 𝐸, our agent has to learn the best policy
234
+ 𝜋𝜃 (𝑎𝑡 | 𝑧𝑡) that selects the action 𝑎𝑡 to be performed in the game.
235
+ While doing this, the model also has to understand which regions of
236
+ 𝑠𝑡 have the most valuable information and learn a policy 𝜋𝜇 (𝑙𝑡 | 𝑧𝑡)
237
+ to choose the set of coordinates (𝑥𝑡,𝑦𝑡) to be taken in the next
238
+ timestep.
239
+ As we have seen in Section 2.2, this problem can be seen as an
240
+ instance of a POMDP. In our case, the observations the agent takes
241
+ are represented by the glimpses, and the history of past interactions
242
+ with the environment is stored in the hidden state of two LSTMs.
243
+ When combining the memory, the current glimpse, and the previ-
244
+ ously chosen location, the LSTMs have all the information needed
245
+ to learn the policies that select the actions and the locations to take
246
+ next.
247
+ 3.1
248
+ Architecture
249
+ The architecture of RAM [12] was the basis for our proposal, as a
250
+ result, we present it in Figure 1 and will briefly describe it next.
251
+ Action
252
+ Network
253
+ Location
254
+ Network
255
+ Core
256
+ Network
257
+ +
258
+ Glimpse Network
259
+ Figure 1: Architecture of RAM. Image adapted from the orig-
260
+ inal paper of Mnih et al. [12]
261
+ Every timestep, RAM receives the game frame 𝑠𝑡 and a set of
262
+ coordinates 𝑙𝑡−1. Its Glimpse Network takes a glimpse 𝑧𝑡 centered
263
+ at 𝑙𝑡−1 and extracts features, not only from 𝑧𝑡, which are repre-
264
+ sented in Figure 1 by 𝑘𝑡, but also from 𝑙𝑡−1. Using fully connected
265
+ layers the two features are merged into the vector 𝑔𝑡. Next, this
266
+ vector is fed to an LSTM, the Core Network, which stores all the
267
+ previous information from the glimpses and the coordinates chosen,
268
+ building its internal memory ℎ𝑡. After that, ℎ𝑡 is the input for two
269
+ other networks, the Action Network and the Location Network,
270
+ which are also fully connected layers that select the next action 𝑎𝑡
271
+ and coordinates 𝑙𝑡, respectively. Since the Location Network was
272
+ non-differentiable, it was trained using the policy gradient method
273
+ REINFORCE, while the other components used backpropagation.
274
+ After the presentation of RAM, some papers proposing improve-
275
+ ments to the image classification capabilities of the model were
276
+ written, such as the publications of Ba et al. [1] and Zuur [22]. After
277
+ the presentation of our architecture, we will describe which refine-
278
+ ments we took into consideration and how we have adapted them
279
+ to our problem.
280
+ Glimpse
281
+ Network
282
+ Action
283
+ Network
284
+ Location
285
+ Network
286
+ Figure 2: Overview of the architecture of the Glimpse-Based
287
+ Actor-Critic
288
+ Figure 2 presents an overview of the GBAC architecture. We
289
+ start by receiving a game frame 𝑠𝑡 and the set of coordinates 𝑙𝑡−1
290
+ our agent chose at the end of the previous timestep. The Glimpse
291
+ Network saves into 𝑘𝑡 the features extracted just from the glimpse
292
+ taken from 𝑠𝑡 and centered at 𝑙𝑡−1. After that, the vector 𝑘𝑡 is used
293
+ as the input of the Action Network. This network outputs not only
294
+ the action 𝑎𝑡 the agent will take next, but also an estimate 𝑣𝑡 of
295
+ the value function. 𝑘𝑡 is also used by the Location Network, which
296
+ merges it with the features extracted from the location 𝑙𝑡−1 to select
297
+ the next location coordinates 𝑙𝑡. In opposition to RAM, instead of
298
+ doing this merging for the input of both networks, we only do it
299
+ for the Location Network.
300
+ We now present the key refinements of RAM that we took into
301
+ consideration to address our problem. To start, we followed Ba et
302
+ al. [1] and added a CNN to the Glimpse Network (represented in
303
+ Figure 3) because it was necessary for the model to extract better
304
+ features from the video frames. As one of the experiments done by
305
+ Zuur [22] suggested, we also found that it was beneficial to provide
306
+ separate inputs for the Action and Location Networks (Figure 2).
307
+ Therefore, the configuration which performed best was the one
308
+ that fed to the Action Network only the features (𝑘𝑡) extracted
309
+ from the glimpse, and to the Location Network the vector resultant
310
+ from the merge between 𝑘𝑡 and the features extracted from 𝑙𝑡−1.
311
+ Still with this idea of separating the processes of choosing the next
312
+ action and the next glimpse coordinates, we added an extra LSTM,
313
+ making the Action Network and the Location Network use their
314
+ separate LSTM (Figures 4 and 5). This separation destroyed the
315
+ need for having an explicit Core Network like in RAM, avoiding
316
+ the mix of information that is necessary for each task and allowing
317
+ us to fine-tune the parameters for each LSTM. The last change we
318
+ made was the selection of PPO instead of REINFORCE to train the
319
+ model since it achieves better results in harder environments [22]
320
+ and we found it simpler to train. This change meant that in each
321
+ timestep, our Action Network also needed to make a prediction 𝑣𝑡
322
+ about the quality of performing the action 𝑎𝑡 in the current state
323
+ of the environment.
324
+ 3.1.1
325
+ Glimpse Network. The Glimpse Network, represented in Fig-
326
+ ure 3, is the module responsible for extracting from the game frame,
327
+ 3
328
+
329
+ ====the region the agent chose to focus its attention. With the image
330
+ coordinates 𝑙𝑡−1 chosen in the previous timestep, this network ex-
331
+ tracts an observation 𝑧𝑡 from 𝑠𝑡, which is called a glimpse. This
332
+ glimpse can have multiple patches, each having double the size
333
+ of the previous. For example, Figure 3 presents a glimpse with
334
+ three patches. However, to simulate peripheral vision, all the larger
335
+ patches are downscaled to the dimension of the smallest. That
336
+ smallest patch will have the highest resolution, making it the focal
337
+ point. Regarding the other patches, the larger they are, the further
338
+ away they are from the focus point, so the lower their resolution
339
+ is. When compared to the original image, this process results in a
340
+ vector with fewer pixels.
341
+ After rescaling, the resultant vector passes through a set of con-
342
+ volutional layers and a fully connected layer to extract a vector of
343
+ features 𝑘𝑡. The number of convolutional layers and their respective
344
+ kernel sizes and stride are changed depending on the size of the
345
+ glimpse.
346
+ CNN
347
+ Figure 3: Detailed diagram of the Glimpse Network of GBAC
348
+ During this work, we assumed that the glimpses are always
349
+ squares. If the coordinates of 𝑙𝑡 make a patch catch pixels that are
350
+ out of the bounds of 𝑠𝑡, that patch will be moved in order to fit
351
+ inside the frame. This mechanism proved to achieve better results
352
+ than simply filling the pixels out of bounds with a value.
353
+ 3.1.2
354
+ Action Network. The Action Network, depicted in Figure 4, is
355
+ responsible to choose the game action 𝑎𝑡 the agent should perform
356
+ in each timestep. Since we chose an actor-critic algorithm to train
357
+ GBAC, the Action Network also estimates the value function, which
358
+ helps the agent to understand if it is performing well or not.
359
+ In this network, its LSTM saves the information 𝑧𝑡 extracted pre-
360
+ viously from the glimpse and combines it with its hidden memory
361
+ ℎ𝑔
362
+ 𝑡−1, which stores all the information gathered in earlier timesteps
363
+ to build an internal representation of the game environment. The
364
+ new hidden state ℎ𝑔
365
+ �� is fed to two fully connected layers, the Actor
366
+ and the Critic, that output the action 𝑎𝑡 and the value 𝑣𝑡, respec-
367
+ tively.
368
+ 3.1.3
369
+ Location Network. The Location Network, illustrated in Fig-
370
+ ure 5, is the module behind the hard attention mechanism and is
371
+ responsible to choose the image coordinates 𝑙𝑡 where the agent
372
+ should look in the next timestep. Those coordinates are sampled
373
+ from a truncated normal distribution whose mean is given by this
374
+ network, being the standard deviation a fixed value.
375
+ In order to choose the mean value, the Location Network has
376
+ a neural network that extracts features from the coordinates 𝑙𝑡−1,
377
+ LSTM
378
+ Actor
379
+ Critic
380
+ 128
381
+ 128
382
+ Figure 4: Detailed diagram of the Action Network of GBAC
383
+ merging them with the features 𝑘𝑡. The resultant vector 𝑔𝑡 is then
384
+ used to update the internal state of an LSTM. Its internal state ℎ𝑙
385
+ 𝑡 is
386
+ fed to the Locator, which is a neural network with two fully con-
387
+ nected layers and ReLU and Tanh activation functions, respectively.
388
+ The Locator chooses the mean value used in the truncated normal
389
+ distribution from which the next set of coordinates 𝑙𝑡 is extracted.
390
+ LSTM
391
+ Locator
392
+ 256
393
+ 640
394
+ Figure 5: Detailed diagram of the Location Network of GBAC
395
+ Since this model only uses a small portion of an image, its com-
396
+ plexity is not dependent on the size of the input image but rather
397
+ on the size of its glimpses. This can be an advantage if the model
398
+ has to handle large images.
399
+ 3.2
400
+ Training
401
+ The training process of our model is very similar to the one pre-
402
+ sented by Schulman et al. in the PPO paper [17]. We follow the
403
+ suggestions they proposed, and the only difference is that we have
404
+ two policy losses, instead of just one. Like PPO, our model alternates
405
+ between interacting with the environment to get new information
406
+ and updating both its policies with that new data.
407
+ When exploring the environment, in each timestep, the model
408
+ saves the action and coordinates of the glimpse it chose, the value
409
+ function estimated by the critic, the reward received from the game,
410
+ and a flag that indicates if the current episode has finished.
411
+ After a predetermined number of timesteps, the model uses the
412
+ collected data to update its policies. For both policies, we use the
413
+ "surrogate" objective already presented in Section 2.2:
414
+ 𝐿𝐶𝐿𝐼𝑃𝜋 (𝜃) = ˆE𝑡
415
+
416
+ min(𝑟𝜋
417
+ 𝑡 (𝜃) ˆ𝐴𝑡, clip(𝑟𝜋
418
+ 𝑡 (𝜃), 1 − 𝜖, 1 + 𝜖) ˆ𝐴𝑡)
419
+
420
+ (3)
421
+ where 𝜖 is a hyperparameter and the advantage function ˆ𝐴𝑡 is
422
+ computed recurring to Generalized Advantage Estimation [16].
423
+ 4
424
+
425
+ ==Besides the two policy losses, the objective has two more terms:
426
+ an entropy bonus 𝐵 that promotes the exploration of the environ-
427
+ ment, and the squared-error loss of the value function, 𝐿𝑉 𝐹
428
+ 𝑡
429
+ . With
430
+ these additions, the objective’s formula is the following:
431
+ 𝐿𝑡 (𝜃) = ˆE𝑡
432
+
433
+ 𝐿𝐶𝐿𝐼𝑃a
434
+ 𝑡
435
+ (𝜃) + 𝐿𝐶𝐿𝐼𝑃g
436
+ 𝑡
437
+ (𝜃) − 𝛼𝐿𝑉 𝐹
438
+ 𝑡
439
+ (𝜃) + 𝛽𝐵[𝜋𝑎](𝑠𝑡)
440
+
441
+ (4)
442
+ where 𝛼 and 𝛽 are coefficients. Note that the entropy bonus is
443
+ only calculated for the action policy, not for both policies. Adding
444
+ the same bonus for the location policy did not seem to improve the
445
+ results, thus we decided to keep the objective simpler.
446
+ 4
447
+ EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION
448
+ In this chapter, we present all the experiments that enabled us
449
+ to test our model, establishing which base PPO algorithm is the
450
+ fairest choice to compare our model with, and discovering which
451
+ size of the glimpses gives better results. In the end, we have all the
452
+ information necessary to answer the questions in Section 1.
453
+ 4.1
454
+ Evaluation Process
455
+ 4.1.1
456
+ Game Environments. In order to measure the performance
457
+ of GBAC and compare it against the state-of-the-art RL agents, we
458
+ selected three game environments with different characteristics.
459
+ The first two are both games from the Atari 2600 and have a discrete
460
+ action space, while the third, is CarRacing [9] from OpenAI Gym [3]
461
+ and has a continuous action space. We tried to select three games
462
+ that were not the easiest ones available and that required the agents
463
+ to learn different sets of skills, such that we could see how they
464
+ were capable to adapt to each type of task.
465
+ In order to obtain the best performance in the Atari games, we
466
+ used the same environment modifications proposed by Mnih et
467
+ al. [13] and Machado et al. [11], thus leading to better results for
468
+ these games. Those modifications are well accepted and used in the
469
+ literature. For example, we resize the original frame from 210x160
470
+ to 84x84 pixels, clip the rewards, and scale the pixel values to [0, 1].
471
+ 4.1.2
472
+ Comparison Models. We decided to compare GBAC with
473
+ three different versions of PPO. The first one is the original PPO
474
+ agent presented by Schulman et al. [17] because it was used as
475
+ the base for our model. However, since our implementation uses
476
+ LSTMs in its architecture and the version of PPO with an LSTM
477
+ is also quite common in the RL literature, we decided to choose
478
+ the PPO+LSTM agent for comparison as well. The third version of
479
+ PPO we used is a modification of the PPO+LSTM algorithm where
480
+ the restriction of only using a small portion of the game frame
481
+ was imposed. But, different from GBAC, the coordinates where the
482
+ agent looks are chosen completely randomly. This allows us to test
483
+ if the perception mechanism implemented in our model is better
484
+ than one that makes its choices randomly.
485
+ The PPO implementation used in this work was not the original
486
+ one provided by Schulman et al. [17] in OpenAI Baselines [5], but
487
+ rather a revised implementation presented by Shengyi et al. [7] that
488
+ closely follows the performance of the original. This implementa-
489
+ tion provides many versions of PPO including one with an LSTM.
490
+ To make the PPO agents capable of playing the selected games, we
491
+ added to their architecture a CNN with the same layout as the one
492
+ presented in the DQN paper [13].
493
+ By comparing GBAC with the first two versions of PPO, we can
494
+ discover if it is possible to achieve state-of-the-art performance
495
+ playing video games, despite having a limited (but active) percep-
496
+ tion of the environment, which was our first question.
497
+ 4.1.3
498
+ Evaluation Metrics. Evaluating RL models is never a straight-
499
+ forward task due to their high variance. For this reason, during
500
+ training and testing, we average the episodic return each agent
501
+ achieved over the last 100 episodes.
502
+ In training, Pong, SpaceInvaders, and CarRacing learned dur-
503
+ ing 15 million, 20 million, and 5 million timesteps, respectively.
504
+ Then, the agent that achieved the best performance over the last
505
+ 100 episodes is tested for another 100 episodes. For each configura-
506
+ tion, the results are always the average over three runs and their
507
+ respective standard deviations are also presented.
508
+ Seeding is another aspect that can have an impact on the per-
509
+ formance of the agent. Certain seeds can make the agent perform
510
+ significantly better or worse. Thus, in each run, the seed used in
511
+ the environment is chosen arbitrarily.
512
+ Regarding the policy that chooses the locations of the glimpses,
513
+ in order to understand if our model learns a behavior that resembles
514
+ the human vision, we analyze the evolution of the policy throughout
515
+ the training phase and present a visual representation of the results.
516
+ This is the information we need to answer our second question.
517
+ Now that the entire evaluation process is detailed, we present,
518
+ in the next sections, the results we obtained.
519
+ 4.2
520
+ Base Models Selection
521
+ In contrast to one of the Atari optimizations proposed by Mnih et
522
+ al. [13] and Machado et al. [11], our model does not perform better
523
+ when the original image is resized. In fact, it never learned a way to
524
+ beat its adversary in Pong when a glimpse smaller than the resized
525
+ size of 84x84 was used. This meant that with that setup, we could
526
+ not take advantage of the glimpse’s structure because the model
527
+ needed the entire image to perform well, which does not follow the
528
+ restriction of our problem. An explanation for this result can be the
529
+ fact that since the glimpses taken by GBAC have multiple patches
530
+ that end up being resized to a lower resolution, and the input frame
531
+ fed to the model was also resized, the loss in information might be
532
+ so much that our agent is not capable of solving the game.
533
+ Therefore, to make the comparisons fair, we decided that the
534
+ base PPO models should also use the entire image as input. In order
535
+ to discover how much this decision could impact the performance
536
+ of the base agents when playing the two Atari games, we studied
537
+ the difference in performance between using the original 210x160
538
+ image and the resized 84x84 input. In CarRacing, since the original
539
+ image is just 96x96, we decided not to compare the base models with
540
+ a resized version of the input. In addition, since GBAC uses LSTMs,
541
+ we compared PPO with PPO+LSTM to find out if they perform any
542
+ differently.
543
+ In Table 1, we show the training and testing performances that
544
+ PPO and PPO+LSTM had when using either the full image frame
545
+ or the resized input. The results shown do not allow us to conclude
546
+ with absolute certainty that one way is better than the other. In
547
+ Pong, there are not any significant differences in performance either
548
+ in regular PPO or in PPO+LSTM. In SpaceInvaders, for the regular
549
+ PPO, the agent that uses the full image achieves average returns that
550
+ 5
551
+
552
+ PongNoFrameskip-v4
553
+ SpaceInvadersNoFrameskip-v4
554
+ CarRacing-v0
555
+ Model
556
+ Full Img.
557
+ Max. Train Avg.
558
+ Test Avg.
559
+ Max. Train Avg.
560
+ Test Avg.
561
+ Max. Train Avg.
562
+ Test Avg.
563
+ PPO
564
+ No
565
+ 21.00 ± 0.01
566
+ 20.98 ± 0.02
567
+ 2090.00 ± 254.16
568
+ 2013.07 ± 244.56
569
+
570
+ -
571
+ PPO
572
+ Yes
573
+ 20.91 ± 0.11
574
+ 20.83 ± 0.13
575
+ 2261.90 ± 295.87
576
+ 2221.62 ± 201.31
577
+ 867.16 ± 6.64
578
+ 824.31 ± 8.04
579
+ PPO + LSTM
580
+ No
581
+ 20.11 ± 0.25
582
+ 20.00 ± 0.31
583
+ 1182.57 ± 259.03
584
+ 1077.63 ± 245.82
585
+ -
586
+ -
587
+ PPO + LSTM
588
+ Yes
589
+ 20.03 ± 0.23
590
+ 19.85 ± 0.39
591
+ 900.20 ± 79.16
592
+ 812.58 ± 111.51
593
+ 783.62 ± 11.58
594
+ 659.73 ± 24.42
595
+ Table 1: Comparison between the training and testing performance of PPO and PPO+LSTM, using a resized frame (84x84) of
596
+ the input and also the full game frame (210x160)
597
+ are around 200 points better than the agent that resizes the input.
598
+ This result indicates that, for this game, some useful information
599
+ is lost during the resizing of the image. However, for the model
600
+ that uses PPO+LSTM, the opposite is verified. Since the size of the
601
+ LSTMs was the same in both cases, this suggests that for the full
602
+ image, the LSTM needed to be bigger because it could extract better
603
+ data from fewer pixels.
604
+ From the same table, when comparing the PPO agent against
605
+ PPO+LSTM for the same type of input, we can see that the use of an
606
+ LSTM deteriorates the performance of the agent. Having in mind
607
+ that in the PPO game, a match ends when a player reaches 21 points
608
+ and the reward of the agent is the difference between the points
609
+ scored and scored against, the difference between the two models is
610
+ marginal. It only means that, on average, the PPO+LSTM agent let
611
+ the opponent score one point, while PPO did not. In SpaceInvaders,
612
+ the performance drops by half, which is a significant reduction.
613
+ In CarRacing, there is also a drop in performance, even though it
614
+ is less accentuated than in SpaceInvaders. The major difference
615
+ between the PPO and PPO+LSTM models is that the former uses
616
+ a stack of four frames as input, while the latter receives just one
617
+ frame at a time, counting on its LSTM to discover and store the
618
+ information that is useful to the agent. Therefore, in SpaceInvaders
619
+ and in CarRacing, the LSTM is not able to store all the information
620
+ needed, like the velocity and direction of the objects from the game,
621
+ which would allow the agent to perform better.
622
+ In short, from these results, we cannot conclude that using the
623
+ resized frame is better than using the full frame, and since our
624
+ model utilizes the full image, in order to make the comparisons
625
+ fairer, with as many equal variables as possible, from here onwards,
626
+ we will be referring to the version that uses an LSTM and the entire
627
+ frame as input when mentioning the base model.
628
+ 4.3
629
+ GBAC Performance Analysis
630
+ In this section, we study not only the impact that different sizes of
631
+ glimpses and different numbers of patches have on the performance
632
+ of our agent but also how the best configuration performs against
633
+ the three versions of PPO.
634
+ In our architecture, each glimpse can have one or more patches.
635
+ Since we stipulated that each new patch has double the size of the
636
+ previous, increasing the number of patches results in glimpses with
637
+ a smaller focus region. This means that if we want glimpses with
638
+ two patches, the largest possible size for the smallest patch is 80x80,
639
+ with three patches it will be 40x40, and with four patches 20x20.
640
+ The higher the number of patches, the larger the "peripheral vision"
641
+ of our model. Nonetheless, this increase in information comes with
642
+ the price of it not being as detailed as the portions of the image
643
+ closer to the focal point.
644
+ With this in mind, besides their architectures, using glimpses
645
+ with just one patch makes our model no different from the base
646
+ PPO agents. Therefore, the results from the agents that use glimpses
647
+ with one patch are just useful to compare the two architectures,
648
+ and to discover how large the input image has to be, in order for
649
+ the agent to maintain its performance. Therefore, the results that
650
+ are relevant to understand the performance of our model are the
651
+ ones given by configurations that use more than one patch.
652
+ 4.3.1
653
+ Pong. In relation to the Atari game Pong, Table 2 presents
654
+ the maximum training average and the testing performance of the
655
+ three PPO versions, as well as the best glimpse size for each number
656
+ of patches of our agent. Since the returns for this game are bounded
657
+ between -21 and +21, when analyzing the performance of all the
658
+ agents, we can see that one of three scenarios occurred: the agent
659
+ learned how to beat its adversary and ended up with scores close to
660
+ +20; the agent did not manage to learn anything useful, resulting in
661
+ scores around -19; or the timesteps were not enough for the agent
662
+ to learn a good policy so it achieved a score between the previous
663
+ two.
664
+ PongNoFrameskip-v4
665
+ Model
666
+ Glimpse
667
+ Max. Train Avg.
668
+ Test Avg.
669
+ PPO
670
+ -
671
+ 20.91 ± 0.11
672
+ 20.83 ± 0.13
673
+ PPO+LSTM
674
+ -
675
+ 20.03 ± 0.23
676
+ 19.85 ± 0.39
677
+ GBAC
678
+ 1p, 160x160
679
+ 7.61 ± 10.42
680
+ 6.95 ± 10.89
681
+ GBAC
682
+ 2p, 80x80
683
+ 7.15 ± 20.80
684
+ 6.64 ± 21.14
685
+ GBAC
686
+ 3p, 40x40
687
+ 20.06 ± 0.44
688
+ 19.82 ± 0.88
689
+ GBAC
690
+ 4p, 20x20
691
+ -14.86 ± 5.39
692
+ -15.77 ± 4.82
693
+ PPO Random
694
+ 3p, 40x40
695
+ -19.87 ± 0.05
696
+ -20.16 ± 0.11
697
+ Table 2: Training and testing performance in Pong
698
+ Regarding the glimpses with one patch, our agent did not manage
699
+ to achieve scores near +20 with the larger glimpse consistently
700
+ because, in two of the three runs, the agent was still improving its
701
+ performance when the timesteps finished. Therefore in this game,
702
+ our agent was not capable of matching the performances of PPO.
703
+ With two patches, the results were slightly better than the previous
704
+ because the standard deviation is much higher. The model achieved
705
+ a score of around +19 in two of the three runs. Using three patches,
706
+ GBAC was capable of matching the performance of the PPO+LSTM
707
+ agent, consistently beating its opponent by 21-1. The difference to
708
+ the regular PPO agent, only means that our agents let the opponent
709
+ 6
710
+
711
+ score a point, while the other did not. After seeing the results until
712
+ this point, we might think that the performance keeps improving
713
+ while we increase the number of patches of each glimpse. However,
714
+ this is not the case when we look at the scores achieved using four
715
+ patches. The size of the patches was so small that our model was
716
+ not capable of achieving a performance of +20 in, at least, one of
717
+ the three runs, which was true in any of the previous results.
718
+ Regarding the PPO agent that took glimpses at random locations,
719
+ we see that it performed very poorly, not being able to learn an
720
+ optimal policy to play Pong. Therefore, we can say that, in this
721
+ game, choosing good glimpse locations matters.
722
+ 4.3.2
723
+ SpaceInvaders. Table 3 shows the training and testing results
724
+ of all the agents for the SpaceInvaders game.
725
+ SpaceInvadersNoFrameskip-v4
726
+ Model
727
+ Glimpse
728
+ Max. Train Avg.
729
+ Test Avg.
730
+ PPO
731
+ -
732
+ 2261.90 ± 295.87
733
+ 2221.62 ± 201.31
734
+ PPO+LSTM
735
+ -
736
+ 900.20 ± 79.16
737
+ 812.58 ± 111.51
738
+ GBAC
739
+ 1p, 160x160
740
+ 741.45 ± 392.54
741
+ 607.42 ± 287.84
742
+ GBAC
743
+ 2p, 80x80
744
+ 444.18 ± 40.78
745
+ 341.47 ± 25.71
746
+ GBAC
747
+ 3p, 40x40
748
+ 596.50 ± 182.35
749
+ 544.43 ± 166.79
750
+ GBAC
751
+ 4p, 20x20
752
+ 439.72 ± 26.27
753
+ 378.00 ± 28.70
754
+ PPO Random
755
+ 3p, 40x40
756
+ 516.62 ± 60.59
757
+ 467.38 ± 50.53
758
+ Table 3: Training and testing performance in SpaceInvaders
759
+ Starting with the results of our model for one patch, we found
760
+ that this time, the average score of GBAC was closer to the one
761
+ achieved by the PPO+LSTM agent. However, when considering the
762
+ results for the glimpses with two patches, the performance dropped
763
+ almost by half. With three patches, GBAC achieves the best perfor-
764
+ mance when considering the use of more than one patch. Nonethe-
765
+ less, the model is not able to match the performance achieved when
766
+ it used the bigger glimpse with just one patch. With four patches,
767
+ we have the same decrease in performance, already seen in Pong.
768
+ However, this time it was not as severe and slightly beat the results
769
+ from two patches while having the smallest standard deviation in
770
+ both training and testing of any of the experiments.
771
+ In this game, our model was not capable of matching the per-
772
+ formance of the PPO+LSTM agent, however, we still consider it
773
+ an interesting result, considering the viewing restrictions of our
774
+ problem. While processing 86% fewer pixels than PPO+LSTM (4.800
775
+ vs. 33.600) in each timestep, GBAC only had a performance drop of
776
+ 33%.
777
+ In this game, the random agent has a performance that is on par
778
+ with our model, which possibly means that in SpaceInvaders the
779
+ location of a glimpse is not that important. One possible reason
780
+ behind this proximity could be the fact that, in this game, GBAC
781
+ can pay attention to a lot more things that can improve the return
782
+ received from the environment. As opposed to Pong, where our
783
+ agent only had three objects (two paddles and one ball) to keep
784
+ track of.
785
+ 4.3.3
786
+ CarRacing. Lastly, Table 4 shows the performance that GBAC
787
+ and the other agents achieved during training and testing, when
788
+ playing the CarRacing game, which has a game frame of size 96x96.
789
+ CarRacing-v0
790
+ Model
791
+ Glimpse
792
+ Max. Train Avg.
793
+ Test Avg.
794
+ PPO
795
+ -
796
+ 867.16 ± 6.64
797
+ 824.31 ± 8.04
798
+ PPO+LSTM
799
+ -
800
+ 783.62 ± 11.58
801
+ 659.73 ± 24.42
802
+ GBAC
803
+ 1p, 96x96
804
+ 815.12 ± 5.75
805
+ 660.02 ± 69.38
806
+ GBAC
807
+ 2p, 40x40
808
+ 694.50 ± 107.94
809
+ 641.11 ± 57.42
810
+ GBAC
811
+ 3p, 20x20
812
+ 676.82 ± 84.89
813
+ 564.00 ± 56.42
814
+ PPO Random
815
+ 2p, 40x40
816
+ 622.41 ± 17.89
817
+ 589.87 ± 13.19
818
+ Table 4: Training and testing performance in CarRacing
819
+ Like in the other two games, here, the largest glimpse size is
820
+ also the one that achieves the better result for a glimpse with one
821
+ patch. In addition, this time our model was capable of matching
822
+ the performance of the PPO+LSTM agent in testing and beating it
823
+ during training. For two patches, the achieved results maintained
824
+ the performance seen in testing when using one patch, even though
825
+ the score in training decreased and had a much higher standard de-
826
+ viation. With three patches, which in CarRacing was the maximum
827
+ number we tested, we start to see the performance drop slightly.
828
+ In this game, GBAC was capable of maintaining its performance
829
+ across all number of patches, which is a good result since the scores
830
+ closely match the PPO+LSTM agent.
831
+ Regarding the PPO agent with random glimpses, the perfor-
832
+ mance difference is again not that far behind our model. Since the
833
+ generated track occupies a good portion of the image, it may be eas-
834
+ ier for the random model to select good actions from every glimpse
835
+ it receives.
836
+ From this study, we can conclude that even when using the entire
837
+ frame (glimpses with one patch) the performance of our model
838
+ is capable of matching the performance of PPO+LSTM, although
839
+ not consistently. This shows our architecture could compete with
840
+ PPO+LSTM if we did not impose our restrictions. Additionally,
841
+ we discovered that the performance of GBAC does not increase
842
+ linearly with the number of patches. It reaches a point where the
843
+ information lost with the reduction of the glimpse size is more
844
+ significant than the information gained with the addition of another
845
+ patch. The optimal number of patches is three for the Atari games
846
+ and two for CarRacing. Those numbers of patches proved to be
847
+ the right balance between having a patch size that discarded the
848
+ irrelevant information, allowing the model to just focus on the most
849
+ important, and not being too small such that after rescaling the
850
+ large patches, it was still possible to understand what was present
851
+ in the "peripheral vision" of the agent. Finally, we saw that in most
852
+ cases, the largest glimpse size possible for each number of patches
853
+ is the one that produces the best results. In CarRacing, for two and
854
+ three patches this was not the case, and the sizes 48x48 and 24x24,
855
+ respectively, did not give the best results, even though they were
856
+ very close.
857
+ An important fact we should mention is that, since the com-
858
+ plexity of our model is independent of the size of the input, we
859
+ can achieve these results with a model that, in the Atari games,
860
+ has 15% fewer total training parameters (∼1.7M vs. ∼2.0M) than
861
+ the PPO+LSTM model, and almost the same number has PPO. In
862
+ CarRacing, since the actions are continuous, the model is bigger,
863
+ but it still has 10% fewer parameters than PPO+LSTM (∼2.2M vs.
864
+ 7
865
+
866
+ (a) Pong 40x40 Glimpse
867
+ (b) Pong Heatmap
868
+ (c) SpaceInvaders 40x40 Glimpse
869
+ (d) SpaceInvaders heatmap
870
+ Figure 6: Frames with glimpses of 3 patches and heatmaps representing the number of times during an episode that the agent
871
+ chose a specific set of image coordinates to be the center of the glimpse, for the Pong and SpaceInvaders games respectively
872
+ ∼2.5M) and only more 70k than PPO. If we use bigger environments
873
+ having frames with many more pixels, this difference between the
874
+ number of training parameters required will only keep increasing.
875
+ 4.4
876
+ Glimpse Movements Analysis
877
+ After discovering how GBAC performs against the other models, it
878
+ is also important to understand how the location of its glimpses is
879
+ evolving throughout training and which behavior the model finds
880
+ outs to be the best. While making this analysis, we also compare
881
+ the agent’s decisions with the choices we would consider when
882
+ playing the games.
883
+ Regarding the regions that our best agents chose to look at during
884
+ the episodes, we can see in Figure 6b and Figure 6d that, for the
885
+ Atari games, their distribution is relatively similar in both games.
886
+ In SpaceInvaders, our agent keeps its focus near the center of the
887
+ image, while in Pong, it chooses locations slightly upwards from
888
+ the center. In general, the distribution of locations in both games
889
+ has more choices closer to the center and becomes more sparse the
890
+ further they are from it.
891
+ Having the focus point almost near the center of the image, as
892
+ we can see in Figure 6b, means that, in Pong, the agent gets the
893
+ location of each paddle from its "peripheral vision" (Figure 6a). We
894
+ think that this choice is different from what a human would select
895
+ to focus on in this particular game. We believe that a human would
896
+ pay more attention to the position of its own paddle and the ball.
897
+ In relation to SpaceInvaders, in our opinion, the choices are much
898
+ closer to what a human would do because the agent keeps its focus
899
+ on the lower rows of enemies (Figure 6c), which are the ones that
900
+ need to be destroyed first.
901
+ Regarding Car Racing, our model presents quite unusual be-
902
+ havior during the training process. It starts similarly to the other
903
+ two games with a circular normal distribution for the location co-
904
+ ordinates (Figure 7a). However, after a few training epochs, that
905
+ distribution starts dispersing over multiple parts of the entire image,
906
+ ending up with the region shown in Figure 7b, creating some kind
907
+ of borders, which constrain the choice of coordinates, and that do
908
+ not correspond to the limits of the image. This last behavior is the
909
+ one that is present in the best solution at the end of training.
910
+ In our opinion, even though in two of the three games, our model
911
+ does not follow exactly what we think is the human vision behavior
912
+ when playing those video games, we would need a more systematic
913
+ (a) Beginning of training
914
+ (b) Middle of training
915
+ Figure 7: Heatmaps representing the evolution of glimpse
916
+ locations in the CarRacing game
917
+ way of analyzing the regions that we select to focus our attention,
918
+ using, for example, an eye-tracking device, to better compare the
919
+ agent’s behavior in relation to humans.
920
+ 5
921
+ CONCLUSION
922
+ This work proposed a solution for the problem of an agent that
923
+ has limited vision, and for that reason, besides deciding which
924
+ action it has to take in the environment, it also has to choose which
925
+ part of the environment it should look at. To solve this problem,
926
+ we proposed GBAC, a model that combines a glimpse-based hard
927
+ attention mechanism with a model-free RL algorithm.
928
+ We started by proving that, for some games like Pong and CarRac-
929
+ ing, our model is already capable of achieving similar performance
930
+ to the PPO version that more closely resembles our model, that is,
931
+ the variant that also uses an LSTM. On other games like SpaceIn-
932
+ vaders, a drop in performance is verified, with means, there still
933
+ is room for improvement. We finished concluding that our model
934
+ does not necessarily choose the same regions of the image that we
935
+ selected to look at when we played the video games ourselves. Only
936
+ in SpaceInvaders we considered this was verified. In addition, in
937
+ CarRacing, we are not able to explain the reason behind the unusual
938
+ behavior of our model.
939
+ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
940
+ This work was partially supported by Portuguese national funds
941
+ through Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) under projects
942
+ 8
943
+
944
+ 4
945
+ 20
946
+ 40
947
+ 3
948
+ 60
949
+ 2
950
+ 80
951
+ 0
952
+ 20
953
+ 40
954
+ 60
955
+ 808
956
+ 20
957
+ 6
958
+ 5
959
+ 40
960
+ 4
961
+ 60
962
+ m
963
+ 2
964
+ 80
965
+ 0
966
+ 20
967
+ 40
968
+ 60
969
+ 80
970
+ 0口U
971
+ 50
972
+ 5
973
+ 4
974
+ 100
975
+ 3
976
+ 150
977
+ 2
978
+ 200
979
+ 0
980
+ 50
981
+ 100
982
+ 150分然4
983
+ 50
984
+ 100
985
+ 2
986
+ 150
987
+ 200
988
+ 0
989
+ 50
990
+ 100
991
+ 150UIDB/50021/2020 (INESC-ID multi-annual funding), PTDC/CCI-
992
+ COM/5060/2021 (RELEvaNT), PTDC/CCI-COM/7203/2020 (HOTSPOT).
993
+ In addition, this research was partially supported by the Air Force
994
+ Office of Scientific Research under award number FA9550-22-1-0475
995
+ and an EU Horizon 2020 project (TAILOR) under GA No. 952215.
996
+ REFERENCES
997
+ [1] Jimmy Ba, Volodymyr Mnih, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. 2015. Multiple Object
998
+ Recognition with Visual Attention. In 3rd International Conference on Learning
999
+ Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, May 7-9, 2015, Conference Track
1000
+ Proceedings.
1001
+ [2] Ruzena Bajcsy. 1988. Active perception. Proc. IEEE 76, 8 (1988), 966–1005.
1002
+ [3] Greg Brockman, Vicki Cheung, Ludwig Pettersson, Jonas Schneider, John Schul-
1003
+ man, Jie Tang, and Wojciech Zaremba. 2016. OpenAI Gym.
1004
+ [4] Charles E. Connor, Howard E. Egeth, and Steven Yantis. 2004. Visual Attention:
1005
+ Bottom-Up Versus Top-Down. Current Biology 14, 19 (2004), R850–R852.
1006
+ [5] Prafulla Dhariwal, Christopher Hesse, Oleg Klimov, Alex Nichol, Matthias Plap-
1007
+ pert, Alec Radford, John Schulman, Szymon Sidor, Yuhuai Wu, and Peter Zhokhov.
1008
+ 2017. OpenAI Baselines. https://github.com/openai/baselines.
1009
+ [6] Saman Ghaffarian, João Valente, Mariska van der Voort, and Bedir Tekinerdogan.
1010
+ 2021. Effect of Attention Mechanism in Deep Learning-Based Remote Sensing
1011
+ Image Processing: A Systematic Literature Review. Remote Sensing 13, 15 (2021).
1012
+ [7] Shengyi Huang, Rousslan Fernand Julien Dossa, Antonin Raffin, Anssi Kanervisto,
1013
+ and Weixun Wang. 2022. The 37 Implementation Details of Proximal Policy
1014
+ Optimization. In ICLR Blog Track. https://iclr-blog-track.github.io/2022/03/25/
1015
+ ppo-implementation-details/
1016
+ [8] Angelos Katharopoulos and Francois Fleuret. 2019. Processing Megapixel Im-
1017
+ ages with Deep Attention-Sampling Models. In Proceedings of the 36th Interna-
1018
+ tional Conference on Machine Learning (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research,
1019
+ Vol. 97). PMLR, 3282–3291.
1020
+ [9] Oleg Klimov. 2016. CarRacing-v0. https://gym.openai.com/envs/CarRacing-v0/
1021
+ [10] Elijah S. Lee. 2021. Active Perception with Neural Networks. arXiv preprint
1022
+ arXiv:2109.02744 (9 2021). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2109.02744
1023
+ [11] Marlos C. Machado, Marc G. Bellemare, Erik Talvitie, Joel Veness, Matthew
1024
+ Hausknecht, and Michael Bowling. 2018. Revisiting the Arcade Learning Envi-
1025
+ ronment: Evaluation Protocols and Open Problems for General Agents. Journal
1026
+ of Artificial Intelligence Research 61, 1 (jan 2018), 523–562.
1027
+ [12] Volodymyr Mnih, Nicolas Heess, Alex Graves, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. 2014.
1028
+ Recurrent Models of Visual Attention. In Proceedings of the 27th International
1029
+ Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Montreal, Canada) (NIPS’14,
1030
+ Vol. 2). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2204–2212.
1031
+ [13] Volodymyr Mnih, Koray Kavukcuoglu, David Silver, Andrei A. Rusu, Joel Veness,
1032
+ Marc G. Bellemare, Alex Graves, Martin Riedmiller, Andreas K. Fidjeland, Georg
1033
+ Ostrovski, Stig Petersen, Charles Beattie, Amir Sadik, Ioannis Antonoglou, Helen
1034
+ King, Dharshan Kumaran, Daan Wierstra, Shane Legg, and Demis Hassabis. 2015.
1035
+ Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature 518, 7540
1036
+ (2015), 529–533.
1037
+ [14] Philip Paquette. 2016.
1038
+ DoomTakeCover-v0.
1039
+ https://gym.openai.com/envs/
1040
+ DoomTakeCover-v0/
1041
+ [15] Daniel L. Schacter, Daniel Todd Gilbert, Daniel M. Wegner, and Bruce M. Hood.
1042
+ 2016. Psychology (2nd european ed.). Palgrave. 133 pages.
1043
+ [16] John Schulman, Philipp Moritz, Sergey Levine, Michael I. Jordan, and Pieter
1044
+ Abbeel. 2015. High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advan-
1045
+ tage Estimation. 4th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR
1046
+ 2016 - Conference Track Proceedings (6 2015).
1047
+ [17] John Schulman, Filip Wolski, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alec Radford, and Oleg Klimov
1048
+ Openai. 2017.
1049
+ Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms.
1050
+ arXiv preprint
1051
+ arXiv:1707.06347 (7 2017). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1707.06347
1052
+ [18] Yujin Tang, Duong Nguyen, and David Ha. 2020.
1053
+ Neuroevolution of Self-
1054
+ Interpretable Agents. In Proceedings of the 2020 Genetic and Evolutionary Com-
1055
+ putation Conference (Cancún, Mexico) (GECCO ’20). Association for Computing
1056
+ Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 414–424.
1057
+ [19] Vajira Thambawita, Inga Strümke, Steven A. Hicks, Pål Halvorsen, Sravanthi
1058
+ Parasa, and Michael A. Riegler. 2021. Impact of Image Resolution on Deep
1059
+ Learning Performance in Endoscopy Image Classification: An Experimental
1060
+ Study Using a Large Dataset of Endoscopic Images. Diagnostics 11, 12 (2021).
1061
+ [20] Feng Wang and David M. J. Tax. 2016. Survey on the attention based RNN model
1062
+ and its applications in computer vision. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.06823 (1 2016).
1063
+ https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1601.06823
1064
+ [21] Xiao Yang. 2020. An Overview of the Attention Mechanisms in Computer Vision.
1065
+ Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1693, 1 (dec 2020), 012173.
1066
+ [22] Marcel Zuur. 2019. Deep Reinforcement Learning of Active Sensing Strategies with
1067
+ POMDPs. Master’s thesis. Radboud University - Faculteit der Sociale Wetenschap-
1068
+ pen.
1069
+ 9
1070
+
1071
+ A
1072
+ EXTENDED RESULTS
1073
+ PongNoFrameskip-v4
1074
+ SpaceInvadersNoFrameskip-v4
1075
+ No. Patches
1076
+ Glimpse Size
1077
+ Max. Train Avg.
1078
+ Test Avg.
1079
+ Max. Train Avg.
1080
+ Test Avg.
1081
+ 1
1082
+ 160
1083
+ 7.61 ± 10.42
1084
+ 6.95 ± 10.89
1085
+ 741.45 ± 392.54
1086
+ 607.42 ± 287.84
1087
+ 1
1088
+ 150
1089
+ -18.96 ± 1.67
1090
+ -19.32 ± 1.38
1091
+ 384.43 ± 72.19
1092
+ 338.45 ± 59.50
1093
+ 1
1094
+ 140
1095
+ -18.93 ± 1.80
1096
+ -19.36 ± 1.47
1097
+ 386.50 ± 75.94
1098
+ 347.08 ± 99.27
1099
+ 1
1100
+ 130
1101
+ -19.92 ± 0.04
1102
+ -20.19 ± 0.03
1103
+ 330.76 ± 77.16
1104
+ 265.00 ± 53.71
1105
+ 1
1106
+ 120
1107
+ -19.86 ± 0.04
1108
+ -20.06 ± 0.05
1109
+ 343.98 ± 137.35
1110
+ 273.00 ± 113.99
1111
+ 1
1112
+ 110
1113
+ -19.89 ± 0.11
1114
+ -20.22 ± 0.08
1115
+ 381.66 ± 85.91
1116
+ 340.12 ± 77.90
1117
+ 1
1118
+ 100
1119
+ -19.89 ± 0.05
1120
+ -20.24 ± 0.11
1121
+ 321.91 ± 51.51
1122
+ 256.78 ± 77.16
1123
+ 1
1124
+ 90
1125
+ -19.65 ± 0.42
1126
+ -19.90 ± 0.36
1127
+ 285.76 ± 61.01
1128
+ 214.35 ± 23.69
1129
+ 1
1130
+ 80
1131
+ -19.90 ± 0.01
1132
+ -20.28 ± 0.05
1133
+ 244.53 ± 7.94
1134
+ 190.83 ± 26.97
1135
+ 1
1136
+ 70
1137
+ -18.47 ± 1.30
1138
+ -18.88 ± 1.08
1139
+ 243.08 ± 23.85
1140
+ 186.83 ± 19.25
1141
+ 1
1142
+ 60
1143
+ -19.89 ± 0.05
1144
+ -20.16 ± 0.09
1145
+ 232.95 ± 17.10
1146
+ 214.58 ± 13.55
1147
+ 1
1148
+ 50
1149
+ -19.63 ± 0.54
1150
+ -19.80 ± 0.56
1151
+ 251.46 ± 33.61
1152
+ 190.62 ± 22.40
1153
+ 1
1154
+ 40
1155
+ -19.93 ± 0.04
1156
+ -20.19 ± 0.11
1157
+ 218.78 ± 2.93
1158
+ 163.42 ± 14.12
1159
+ 1
1160
+ 30
1161
+ -19.95 ± 0.03
1162
+ -20.17 ± 0.17
1163
+ 221.73 ± 4.20
1164
+ 170.33 ± 21.35
1165
+ 1
1166
+ 20
1167
+ -19.75 ± 0.32
1168
+ -20.11 ± 0.25
1169
+ 244.51 ± 4.90
1170
+ 203.97 ± 23.26
1171
+ 1
1172
+ 10
1173
+ -19.87 ± 0.07
1174
+ -20.23 ± 0.06
1175
+ 238.90± 15.14
1176
+ 188.23 ± 32.58
1177
+ 2
1178
+ 80
1179
+ 7.15 ± 20.80
1180
+ 6.64 ± 21.14
1181
+ 444.18 ± 40.78
1182
+ 341.47 ± 25.71
1183
+ 2
1184
+ 70
1185
+ -6.68 ± 22.92
1186
+ -6.99 ± 22.80
1187
+ 371.68 ± 58.30
1188
+ 296.10 ± 36.34
1189
+ 2
1190
+ 60
1191
+ -19.86 ± 0.05
1192
+ -20.27 ± 0.18
1193
+ 371.21 ± 6.30
1194
+ 350.15 ± 10.13
1195
+ 2
1196
+ 50
1197
+ -16.72 ± 5.48
1198
+ -17.17 ± 5.20
1199
+ 283.81 ± 76.94
1200
+ 217.58± 62.06
1201
+ 2
1202
+ 40
1203
+ -19.91 ± 0.03
1204
+ -20.19 ± 0.07
1205
+ 252.58 ± 22.31
1206
+ 194.52 ± 26.93
1207
+ 2
1208
+ 30
1209
+ -17.24 ± 2.34
1210
+ -17.52 ± 2.43
1211
+ 248.98 ± 5.78
1212
+ 208.03 ± 7.23
1213
+ 2
1214
+ 20
1215
+ -19.87 ± 0.07
1216
+ -20.17 ± 0.16
1217
+ 241.50 ± 10.81
1218
+ 190.52 ± 31.40
1219
+ 2
1220
+ 10
1221
+ -19.91 ± 0.06
1222
+ -20.24 ± 0.09
1223
+ 243.51 ± 5.16
1224
+ 209.43 ± 32.67
1225
+ 3
1226
+ 40
1227
+ 20.06 ± 0.44
1228
+ 19.82 ± 0.88
1229
+ 596.50 ± 182.35
1230
+ 544.43 ± 166.79
1231
+ 3
1232
+ 30
1233
+ -10.99 ± 10.42
1234
+ -11.80 ± 9.05
1235
+ 274.38 ± 5.24
1236
+ 212.07 ± 34.62
1237
+ 3
1238
+ 20
1239
+ -19.92 ± 0.01
1240
+ -20.12 ± 0.10
1241
+ 293.12 ± 28.46
1242
+ 228.63 ± 28.06
1243
+ 3
1244
+ 10
1245
+ -19.93 ± 0.03
1246
+ -20.35 ± 0.39
1247
+ 251.60 ± 12.27
1248
+ 194.13 ± 31.28
1249
+ 4
1250
+ 20
1251
+ -14.86 ± 5.39
1252
+ -15.77 ± 4.82
1253
+ 439.72 ± 26.27
1254
+ 378.00 ± 28.70
1255
+ 4
1256
+ 10
1257
+ -19.86 ± 0.05
1258
+ -20.23 ± 0.08
1259
+ 297.45 ± 9.98
1260
+ 252.77 ± 13.72
1261
+ Table 5: Training and testing performance of every glimpse size for every number of patches tested in Pong and SpaceInvaders.
1262
+ 10
1263
+
1264
+ CarRacing-v0
1265
+ No. Patches
1266
+ Glimpse Size
1267
+ Max. Train Avg.
1268
+ Test Avg.
1269
+ 1
1270
+ 96
1271
+ 815.12 ± 5.75
1272
+ 660.02 ± 69.38
1273
+ 1
1274
+ 90
1275
+ 675.12 ± 84.89
1276
+ 607.46 ± 39.81
1277
+ 1
1278
+ 80
1279
+ 741.03 ± 112.73
1280
+ 534.56 ± 72.77
1281
+ 1
1282
+ 70
1283
+ 747.12 ± 103.91
1284
+ 258.70 ± 274.03
1285
+ 1
1286
+ 60
1287
+ 692.40 ± 121.21
1288
+ 546.35 ± 40.01
1289
+ 1
1290
+ 50
1291
+ 559.05 ± 19.45
1292
+ 361.30 ± 73.27
1293
+ 1
1294
+ 40
1295
+ 539.68 ± 11.35
1296
+ 485.85 ± 9.80
1297
+ 1
1298
+ 30
1299
+ 187.67 ± 136.04
1300
+ 32.64 ± 81.82
1301
+ 1
1302
+ 20
1303
+ 155.15 ± 77.05
1304
+ 152.99 ± 75.43
1305
+ 1
1306
+ 10
1307
+ 138.51 ± 88.40
1308
+ 128.90 ± 94.17
1309
+ 2
1310
+ 48
1311
+ 748.70 ± 74.90
1312
+ 544.58 ± 132.04
1313
+ 2
1314
+ 40
1315
+ 694.50 ± 107.94
1316
+ 641.11 ± 57.42
1317
+ 2
1318
+ 30
1319
+ 616.74 ± 84.43
1320
+ 347.20 ± 243.31
1321
+ 2
1322
+ 20
1323
+ 465.76 ± 74.51
1324
+ 375.30 ± 164.83
1325
+ 2
1326
+ 10
1327
+ 161.44 ± 36.96
1328
+ 145.80 ± 48.40
1329
+ 3
1330
+ 24
1331
+ 700.53 ± 28.06
1332
+ 472.35 ± 295.73
1333
+ 3
1334
+ 20
1335
+ 676.82 ± 84.89
1336
+ 564.00 ± 56.42
1337
+ 3
1338
+ 10
1339
+ 545.18 ± 92.57
1340
+ 509.85 ± 70.74
1341
+ Table 6: Training and testing performance of every glimpse size for every number of patches tested in CarRacing.
1342
+ B
1343
+ ALGORITHMS HYPERPARAMETERS
1344
+ Hyperparameter
1345
+ Value(s)
1346
+ PPO
1347
+ Advantage normalization
1348
+ True
1349
+ Annealing learning rate
1350
+ True
1351
+ Batch size
1352
+ [1024, 2048]
1353
+ Clipping coefficient - action
1354
+ [0.1, 0.2]
1355
+ Clipping coefficient - location
1356
+ 0.2
1357
+ Clipped value loss
1358
+ True
1359
+ Entropy coefficient
1360
+ [0.01, 0]
1361
+ GAE lambda
1362
+ 0.95
1363
+ Gamma
1364
+ 0.99
1365
+ Grayscale
1366
+ True
1367
+ Learning rate - action
1368
+ [2.5e-4, 3e-4]
1369
+ Learning rate - location
1370
+ 3e-5
1371
+ Locator normal distrib. variance
1372
+ 0.1
1373
+ Maximum gradient clipping norm
1374
+ 0.5
1375
+ Minibatch size
1376
+ [256, 64]
1377
+ No. environments
1378
+ [8, 1]
1379
+ No. minibatches
1380
+ [4, 32]
1381
+ No. steps
1382
+ [128, 2048]
1383
+ Optimizer
1384
+ Adam
1385
+ Update k epochs
1386
+ [4, 10]
1387
+ Value function coefficient
1388
+ 0.5
1389
+ Glimpse
1390
+ Glimpse scale
1391
+ 2
1392
+ Glimpse FC layer size
1393
+ [384, 512]
1394
+ Location FC layer size
1395
+ 256
1396
+ LSTM size
1397
+ 128
1398
+ No. glimpses
1399
+ 1
1400
+ Table 7: List of parameters used in GBAC, in the Atari games and CarRacing, respectively
1401
+ 11
1402
+
0dE2T4oBgHgl3EQfNAY2/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
8NAyT4oBgHgl3EQfQvar/content/tmp_files/2301.00053v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1060 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ arXiv:2301.00053v1 [gr-qc] 30 Dec 2022
2
+ MNRAS 000, 1–8 (2022)
3
+ Preprint 3 January 2023
4
+ Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0
5
+ Time delay induced by plasma in strong lens systems
6
+ Gennady S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan1,2★ and Oleg Yu. Tsupko1†
7
+ 1Space Research Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya 84/32, Moscow 117997, Russia
8
+ 2National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), Kashirskoe Shosse 31,
9
+ Moscow 115409, Russia
10
+ Accepted XXX. Received YYY; in original form ZZZ
11
+ ABSTRACT
12
+ If the gravitational lens is surrounded by non-homoheneousplasma, in addition to the vacuum
13
+ gravitational deflection, chromatic refraction occurs. Also, the speed of signal propagation
14
+ decreases compared to vacuum. In this article, we investigate analytically the time delay in
15
+ the case of gravitational lensing in plasma, focusing on strong lens systems. We take into
16
+ account the following contributions: geometric delay due to trajectory bending in the presence
17
+ of both gravity and plasma; potential delay of the ray in the gravitational field of the lens;
18
+ dispersion delay in the plasma due to decrease of speed of light signal in the medium. We
19
+ consider singular isothermal sphere as a model of gravitational lens, and arbitrary spherically
20
+ symmetric distribution of surrounding plasma. For this scenario, plasma corrections for the
21
+ time delay between two images are found in compact analytical form convenient for estimates.
22
+ We discuss also the possible influence of the plasma on the value of the Hubble constant,
23
+ determined from observations of the time delay in strong lens systems.
24
+ Key words: gravitational lensing: strong – plasmas
25
+ 1
26
+ INTRODUCTION
27
+ As one of its effects, gravitational lensing results in a time delay of
28
+ the rays compared to unlensed propagation. In strong lens systems
29
+ with multiple images, different images have different delays, and
30
+ the time delay between images can be measured. Observations of
31
+ the time delay make it possible to determine the Hubble constant.
32
+ If the gravitational lens is surrounded by non-homogeneous
33
+ plasma, chromatic refraction occurs, in addition to the vacuum grav-
34
+ itational deflection.1 As a result, various chromatic effects can be
35
+ expected (see next Section for a description of the state of research).
36
+ Also, the speed of signal propagation decreases compared to vac-
37
+ uum. This manifests itself, for example, in the measured time delay
38
+ of the signal at different radio frequencies from pulsars in the inter-
39
+ stellar medium.
40
+ The time delay between images in presence of plasma around a
41
+ ★ E-mail: [email protected] (GSBK); ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-
42
+ 0002-2981-664X
43
+ † E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] (OYuT); ORCID iD:
44
+ https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2159-8350
45
+ 1 It should be noted that even if the plasma is homogeneous, i.e., there
46
+ is no refraction, the deflection of light will be different from the vac-
47
+ uum and chromatic. This issue has been discussed in detail in our pa-
48
+ pers (Bisnovatyi-Kogan & Tsupko 2009, 2010; Tsupko & Bisnovatyi-Kogan
49
+ 2013), and the corresponding corrections have been calculated. A similar
50
+ effect will be observed in other media with dispersion (Tsupko 2021). Usu-
51
+ ally these corrections are less than the corrections connected with refraction,
52
+ and in the present paper we neglect them. For more details, see our review
53
+ (Bisnovatyi-Kogan & Tsupko 2017).
54
+ gravitational lens (that is, with the simultaneous influence of gravity
55
+ and the plasma medium) has not yet been widely discussed in the
56
+ literature. Combined effect of plasma and weak gravitational field
57
+ on propagation of signals was considered in Muhleman & Johnston
58
+ (1966). They discussed the signal delay at radio frequencies in solar-
59
+ corona plasma, in relation to earlier suggested Shapiro’s experiment
60
+ (Shapiro 1964). See also Muhleman, Ekers & Fomalont (1970).
61
+ Much later, already after creation of the developed gravita-
62
+ tional lens theory, the time delay in the case of gravitational lensing
63
+ in plasma has been briefly discussed by Er & Mao (2014). They have
64
+ modeled the strong lens system and, in particular, numerically esti-
65
+ mated the time delay between images and considered its influence
66
+ on measuring of the Hubble constant value. A related discussion is
67
+ presented in the article of Er, Yang & Rogers (2020). The authors
68
+ consider the time delay for the light propagation in the plasma, i.e.
69
+ do not consider gravitational effects.2 They take into account both
70
+ 2 To avoid confusion, we would like to remind that three different concepts
71
+ should be distinguished: (i) conventional vacuum gravitational lensing, in
72
+ which the deflection angle is determined by the gravitational deflection of
73
+ rays by massive objects in vacuum, for example, Einstein’s formula for small
74
+ angles; (ii) diverging plasma lensing, in which the deflection is caused by
75
+ refractionoflightrays oncompact plasmainhomogeneties (nogravity effects
76
+ here); (iii) gravitational lensing in presence of plasma, in which the weak
77
+ or strong deflection of light due to gravity is combined with the chromatic
78
+ deflection in the plasma. Effects of gravity and plasma can be completely
79
+ separated only for weak deflection case. For strong gravity regime (not
80
+ considered in this article), self-consistent approach should be applied, see
81
+ Section 2 for more details.
82
+ © 2022 The Authors
83
+
84
+ 2
85
+ G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan and O. Yu. Tsupko
86
+ the dispersion delay and plasma geometric delay. A detailed com-
87
+ parison of vacuum gravitational lensing and plasma lensing (notion
88
+ used for refraction on compact plasma inhomogeneities, Clegg et al
89
+ (1998); Tuntsov et al (2016); Vedantham et al (2017); Dong et al
90
+ (2018); Er, Yang & Rogers (2020)) is presented in the article of
91
+ Wagner & Er (2020). Just recently, the effects of plasma on the time
92
+ delay for strongly lensed fast radio bursts has been investigated by
93
+ Er & Mao (2022), where both gravitational and plasma effects are
94
+ taken into account; see also Kumar & Beniamini (2022).
95
+ In this article, we investigate the time delay in the case of grav-
96
+ itational lensing in plasma, focusing on strong lens systems. We
97
+ consider this subject completely analytically and find compact ex-
98
+ pressions for plasma corrections which are convenient for making
99
+ estimates. By ’strong lens system’ and ’strong lensing’, we mean
100
+ here a observational situation where a gravitational lens produces
101
+ multiple images. To model such systems found in observations, it is
102
+ always sufficient to use the deflection angle in the weak deflection
103
+ approximation. Therefore, the notion ’strong lensing’ should not
104
+ be confused with ’strong deflection lensing’ or ’strong field lens-
105
+ ing’ by compact objects where the deflection angles are large and
106
+ can produce higher-order images (e.g., Tsupko & Bisnovatyi-Kogan
107
+ 2013).
108
+ In a weak deflection approximation, the total deflection angle
109
+ can be calculated as the sum of vacuum gravitational deflection, and
110
+ contribution of the refractive plasma deflection. In this approxima-
111
+ tion, the time delay of lensed ray (relative to the undeflected straight
112
+ line ray) can be presented as a sum of the following contributions:
113
+ geometric delay due to trajectory bending in the presence of both
114
+ gravity and plasma; potential delay of the ray in the gravitational
115
+ field of the lens; dispersion delay in the plasma due to decrease of
116
+ speed of light signal in the medium; see also Er & Mao (2022).
117
+ We calculate the time delay between two images in the follow-
118
+ ing scenario: gravitational lens is given by the singular isothermal
119
+ sphere (SIS) model, while the plasma component is given by arbi-
120
+ trary spherically symmetric distribution. Plasma corrections to the
121
+ image positions and the time delay are found in a compact analytical
122
+ form. We discuss also a possible influence of plasma effects on the
123
+ value of the Hubble constant, determined from observations of the
124
+ time delay in strong lens systems.
125
+ The paper is organized as follows. Next Section is a brief
126
+ overview of the current state of research of gravitational lensing in
127
+ plasma. In Section 3 we present the general expression for the time
128
+ delay under considered approximations. In Section 4, the plasma
129
+ corrections for the image positions in case of SIS lens are calculated.
130
+ In Section 5, the plasma corrections for the time delay for SIS lens
131
+ are found. In Section 6 we present the example of application of our
132
+ formulas. Section 7 is our Conclusions.
133
+ 2
134
+ STUDIES OF GRAVITATIONAL LENSING IN
135
+ PLASMA: BRIEF REVIEW OF RESEARCH
136
+ The simplest approach for considering gravitational lensing in
137
+ plasma is to use the linearized approximation, when both vacuum
138
+ gravitational deflection and refraction in an inhomogeneous plasma
139
+ aresmall, andtwodeflectionanglesarewrittencompletelyseparated
140
+ from each other. Such method was considered in Bliokh & Minakov
141
+ (1989). The same way of deflection angle calculation was used for
142
+ numerical modelling of different effects in strong lens systems by
143
+ Er & Mao (2014) and for investigation of microlensing effect in
144
+ plasma by Tsupko & Bisnovatyi-Kogan (2020); Sun, Er & Tsupko
145
+ (2022). The discussion of different scenarios is also presented in se-
146
+ ries of papers of Bisnovatyi-Kogan & Tsupko (2009, 2010, 2015).
147
+ In the current paper we are also working in such approximation for
148
+ calculation of the deflection angle.
149
+ If a more accurate account of plasma effects is neces-
150
+ sary, due to physical conditions of the problem, a self-consistent
151
+ approach should be used. This means that the total deflec-
152
+ tion angle (determined by gravity and plasma) should be de-
153
+ rived from the same theory. The propagation of rays in the
154
+ curved space in presence of a medium was considered by Synge
155
+ (1960) and Perlick (2000), see also Bičák & Hadrava (1975) and
156
+ Kulsrud & Loeb (1992). On the basis of Synge’s equations, the
157
+ deflection angle of ray in presence of both gravity and plasma
158
+ has been investigated in the weak deflection approximation by
159
+ Bisnovatyi-Kogan & Tsupko (2009, 2010, 2015). In particular, it
160
+ has been shown that even in a homogeneous plasma where there
161
+ is no refraction, the gravitational deflection angle differs from the
162
+ vacuum one. Calculation of the deflection angle of light rays in
163
+ plasma media up to higher order terms in expansion by plasma
164
+ and gravity have been made in the works of Crisnejo and Gallo
165
+ with coathours (Crisnejo & Gallo 2018; Crisnejo, Gallo & Rogers
166
+ 2019; Crisnejo, Gallo & Jusufi 2019). For a weak deflection in
167
+ the Kerr metric, see Morozova, Ahmedov & Tursunov (2013) and
168
+ Crisnejo, Gallo & Jusufi (2019).
169
+ The exact expression for the deflection angle for a ray propaga-
170
+ tion in a gravitational field in the presence of plasma, was first found
171
+ in the monograph of Perlick (2000). The expression was derived for
172
+ the motion in the equatorial plane of Kerr black hole. In the arti-
173
+ cle of Tsupko & Bisnovatyi-Kogan (2013), the positions of higher-
174
+ order images (Darwin 1959; Virbhadra & Ellis 2000; Bozza et al
175
+ 2001; Perlick 2004; Bisnovatyi-Kogan & Tsupko 2008, 2017) were
176
+ calculated analytically when lensed by the Schwarzschild black
177
+ hole in a homogeneous plasma. An important contribution to the
178
+ subject has been made in a series of articles by Rogers (2015,
179
+ 2016, 2017a,b), where various effects near compact objects have
180
+ been considered. Recently, spatial dispersion of light rays prop-
181
+ agating through a plasma in Kerr space-time was investigated
182
+ in Kimpson, Wu & Zane (2019a), see also Kimpson, Wu & Zane
183
+ (2019b). The exact expression for the deflection angle in gravita-
184
+ tional field in presence of arbitrary medium with a spherical sym-
185
+ metry was found by Tsupko (2021).
186
+ Recent
187
+ studies
188
+ of
189
+ gravitational
190
+ lensing
191
+ in
192
+ plasmas
193
+ in
194
+ the
195
+ strong
196
+ gravity
197
+ regime
198
+ are
199
+ also
200
+ focused
201
+ on
202
+ the
203
+ shadow (Falcke, Melia & Agol 2000; Cunha & Herdeiro 2018;
204
+ Perlick & Tsupko 2022) of black holes. The influence of the
205
+ plasma medium on the propagation of rays and on the size
206
+ and shape of the black hole shadow was calculated for the
207
+ Schwarzschild black hole in Perlick, Tsupko & Bisnovatyi-Kogan
208
+ (2015),
209
+ and
210
+ for
211
+ the
212
+ Kerr
213
+ black
214
+ hole
215
+ in
216
+ Perlick & Tsupko
217
+ (2017), see also subsequent papers Huang, Dong & Liu (2018);
218
+ Yan (2019); Babar et al (2020); Badía & Eiroa (2021, 2022);
219
+ Chowdhuri & Bhattacharyya (2021); Li et al (2022); Zhang et al
220
+ (2022); Briozzo, Gallo & Mädler (2022). The light propagation in
221
+ plasma (incl. separability of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation and black
222
+ hole shadow) was considered in a general case of axially symmetric
223
+ and stationary spacetime by Bezděková, Perlick & Bičák (2022).
224
+ Interesting results are obtained by Briozzo & Gallo (2022)
225
+ who have generalized the approximate formula of Beloborodov
226
+ (2002) for gravitational bending of light near compact objects by
227
+ including plasma corrections. Diffraction of the light by the gravity
228
+ of the Sun and the solar corona is discussed by Turyshev & Toth
229
+ (2019a,b). For propagation of light through magnetized plasma in
230
+ presence of gravity see Breuer & Ehlers (1980), Breuer & Ehlers
231
+ MNRAS 000, 1–8 (2022)
232
+
233
+ Time delay induced by plasma in strong lens systems
234
+ 3
235
+ (1981a),
236
+ Breuer & Ehlers
237
+ (1981b),
238
+ Broderick & Blandford
239
+ (2003a), Broderick & Blandford (2003b). For some other re-
240
+ cent
241
+ studies
242
+ see
243
+ Schulze-Koops, Perlick & Schwarz
244
+ (2017),
245
+ Javed, Abbas & Övgün
246
+ (2019),
247
+ Sárený and Balek
248
+ (2019),
249
+ Matsuno (2021), Chainakun, Watcharangkool & Young (2022);
250
+ Guerrieri & Novello (2022). Review of different plasma ef-
251
+ fects, incl. strong lens systems and shadow is presented by
252
+ Bisnovatyi-Kogan & Tsupko
253
+ (2017).
254
+ Recently,
255
+ Crisnejo et al
256
+ (2022); Crisnejo (2022); Ulla (2022) have considered strong lens
257
+ systems given by singular isothermal ellipsoid and have studied the
258
+ plasma effects analytically using perturbative approach.
259
+ Plasma lensing studies have been also carried out in Clegg et al
260
+ (1998), Tuntsov et al (2016), Cordes et al (2017), Vedantham et al
261
+ (2017), Dong et al (2018). In a series of papers of Er and
262
+ Rogers (Er & Rogers 2018; Rogers & Er 2019; Er & Rogers 2019;
263
+ Er, Yang & Rogers 2020), the formalism of gravitational lensing has
264
+ been successfully applied to consider different models of plasma
265
+ lenses. Interesting discussion and comparison of vacuum gravita-
266
+ tional lensing and plasma lensing can be found in the paper of
267
+ Wagner & Er (2020).
268
+ 3
269
+ TIME DELAY IN THE CASE OF SIMULTANEOUS
270
+ PRESENCE OF GRAVITY AND PLASMA: GENERAL
271
+ EXPRESSION
272
+ In this Section, we will consider the time delay in presence of both
273
+ gravitational lens and plasma. We write the total deflection angle of
274
+ light ray as the sum of vacuum gravitational deflection and refractive
275
+ plasma deflection:
276
+ ˆ훼 = ˆ훼푔푟푎푣 + ˆ훼푟푒 푓 푟 ;
277
+ ˆ훼푔푟푎푣, ˆ훼푟푒 푓 푟 ≪ 1 .
278
+ (1)
279
+ Both angles are assumed to be small and independent on each other.
280
+ Effects of gravity and plasma are taken into account in the linear
281
+ order only, all mixed and higher-order terms are neglected here.
282
+ Working in the same order of approximation, we take into
283
+ account the following contributions in time delay, as compared to
284
+ straight-line propagation in vacuum in absence of gravity:
285
+ (i) the geometric delay Δ푡푔푒표푚 associated with additional path
286
+ length due to the bending of the trajectory in the presence of both
287
+ gravity and plasma;
288
+ (ii) the potential delay Δ푡 푝표푡 of the ray caused by time re-
289
+ tardation of the ray while moving in the gravitational field of the
290
+ lens;
291
+ (iii) the dispersion delay Δ푡푑푖푠푝 in the plasma associated with
292
+ a decrease of the signal velocity in the medium.
293
+ This approach can be compared with the vacuum gravitational
294
+ lensing case (when geometrical and potential delays are taken into
295
+ accound) and plasma lensing case (when geometrical and dispersive
296
+ delay are used).
297
+ We assume spherical symmetry of both the lens and the sur-
298
+ rounding plasma. Therefore, one-dimensional variables can be used
299
+ in the lens equation and the time delay expressions. Note that in
300
+ general case, positions of source and images are described by two
301
+ dimensional quantities in the source plane and lens plane, corre-
302
+ spondingly. However, for axially symmetric cases, it is possible to
303
+ switch to one-dimensional values in the lens equation which will be
304
+ now defined in the plane where all rays forming images are located
305
+ (plane of picture in Fig.1).
306
+ The geometrical delay is (e.g., Schneider, Ehlers & Falco
307
+ 1992;
308
+ Schneider, Kochanek & Wambsganss
309
+ 2006;
310
+ Figure 1. (COLOR ONLINE)Standard scheme of gravitational lensing. The
311
+ light ray from the distant source at the angular position 훽 is deflected by the
312
+ lens at the angle ˆ훼 and comes to the observer at the angle 휃. Primary image
313
+ is denoted as 휃+, and secondary image as 휃−. 퐷푑 is the distance between
314
+ the lens and the observer, 퐷푠 defines the distance between the distant source
315
+ and the observer, and 퐷푑푠 is the distance between the source and the lens.
316
+ Congdon & Keeton 2018; Dodelson 2017):
317
+ Δ푡푔푒표푚(휃) = 1 + 푧푑
318
+
319
+ 퐷푑퐷푠
320
+ 퐷푑푠
321
+ (휃 − 훽)2
322
+ 2
323
+ .
324
+ (2)
325
+ Here 훽 is the angular position of the source, 휃 is the position of
326
+ the image, 푧푑 is the redshift of the lens, 퐷푖 are angular diameter
327
+ distances (Fig.1). The form of expression (2) is universal in the
328
+ sense that it can be used for deflection caused by any physical rea-
329
+ son. It is used not only in vacuum gravitational lensing but also
330
+ in plasma lensing (Er, Yang & Rogers 2020; Wagner & Er 2020).
331
+ The importance of the geometric delay in comparison with poten-
332
+ tial delay was discussed in our paper (Tsupko et al 2020), see also
333
+ Hackmann & Dhani (2019).
334
+ The potential delay is (e.g., Schneider, Ehlers & Falco 1992;
335
+ Schneider, Kochanek & Wambsganss
336
+ 2006;
337
+ Congdon & Keeton
338
+ 2018; Dodelson 2017):
339
+ Δ푡 푝표푡 (휃) = −1 + 푧푑
340
+
341
+ 퐷푑퐷푠
342
+ 퐷푑푠
343
+ 휓(휃) + const .
344
+ (3)
345
+ Here 휓(휃) is the deflection potential (Schneider, Ehlers & Falco
346
+ 1992; Schneider, Kochanek & Wambsganss 2006) (lens potential,
347
+ Congdon & Keeton (2018)) that depends on the mass distribution
348
+ in the lens and is defined so that its gradient gives the deflection
349
+ angle:
350
+ 휶 = ∇휓,
351
+ where
352
+ 휶 = 퐷푑푠
353
+ 퐷푠
354
+ ˆ휶 .
355
+ (4)
356
+ The dispersive delay is considered here for cold non-
357
+ magnetized plasma with the refractive index 푛:
358
+ 푛2 = 1 −
359
+ 휔2푝
360
+ 휔2 ,
361
+ 휔2
362
+ 푝 = 4휋푒2
363
+ 푚푒
364
+ 푁푒 ,
365
+ (5)
366
+ where 휔푝 is the plasma electron frequency, 휔 is the photon
367
+ frequency (locally measured), 푚푒 and 푒 are the electron mass
368
+ MNRAS 000, 1–8 (2022)
369
+
370
+ 4
371
+ G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan and O. Yu. Tsupko
372
+ and charge, 푁푒 is the electron number density in plasma. Work-
373
+ ing in the linearized approximation with separated gravitational
374
+ and plasma terms, we can neglect the change of photon fre-
375
+ quency due to the gravitational field (gravitational redshift) in
376
+ the terms containing plasma. Note that this cannot be neglected
377
+ if it is necessary to calculate the plasma effects more precisely,
378
+ for example, when finding corrections to the vacuum gravita-
379
+ tional deflection due to the presence of homogeneous plasma
380
+ (Bisnovatyi-Kogan & Tsupko 2009, 2010), or in case of black hole
381
+ shadow calculation (Perlick, Tsupko & Bisnovatyi-Kogan 2015;
382
+ Perlick & Tsupko 2017, 2022). In addition, if one is interested in
383
+ the frequency of observation 휔0, the following relation must be
384
+ taken into account: 휔 = (1 + 푧푑) 휔0, where 푧푑 is the lens redshift,
385
+ see, e.g., Crisnejo et al (2022); Cordes et al (2017).
386
+ With usual assumption, 휔 ≫ 휔푝, one finds:
387
+ 푛 ≃ 1 −
388
+ 휔2푝
389
+ 2휔2 = 1 − 2휋푒2
390
+ 푚푒휔2 푁푒 ,
391
+ (6)
392
+ and for delay of ray in plasma in comparison with vacuum propa-
393
+ gation we write:
394
+ Δ푡 = 1
395
+
396
+
397
+ � 1
398
+ 푛 − 1
399
+
400
+ 푑푙 ≃
401
+ 2휋푒2
402
+ 푐푚푒휔2 푁푖푛푡 ,
403
+ (7)
404
+ where
405
+ 푁푖푛푡 =
406
+
407
+ 푁푒푑푙 .
408
+ (8)
409
+ Here 푁푖푛푡 is the projected electron density along the line of sight,
410
+ usually referred to as the dispersion measure DM. Together with the
411
+ cosmological factor we find finally:
412
+ Δ푡푑푖푠푝 = 1 + 푧푑
413
+
414
+ 2휋푒2
415
+ 푚푒휔2 푁푖푛푡 .
416
+ (9)
417
+ As a result, the formula for the time delay becomes (see also
418
+ Er, Yang & Rogers (2020), Er & Mao (2022)):
419
+ Δ푡(휃) = 퐷Δ푡
420
+
421
+ � 1
422
+ 2 (휃 − 훽)2 − 휓(휃)
423
+
424
+ + 1 + 푧푑
425
+
426
+ 퐾푒
427
+ 2휔2 푁푖푛푡 (|휃|) ,
428
+ (10)
429
+ where we use a notation 퐾푒 ≡ 4휋푒2/푚푒. The variable
430
+ 퐷Δ푡 = (1 + 푧푑) 퐷푑퐷푠
431
+ 퐷푑푠
432
+ (11)
433
+ is known as time-delay distance (Suyu et al 2010, 2018).
434
+ The formula (10) is general in the sense that any distribution
435
+ of gravitating mass in the lens can be considered (which defines
436
+ the function 휓(휃) together with the deflection angle, according
437
+ to eq.(4)) and any spherically symmetric distribution of surround-
438
+ ing plasma given by 푁푒 and 푁푖푛푡 (|휃|) can be used. We also note
439
+ that the dispersive term is present both in homogeneous and not-
440
+ homogeneous plasma, but it is not related to correction to gravita-
441
+ tional deflection in homogeneous plasma discussed in the Introduc-
442
+ tion.
443
+ With the simultaneous presence of gravity and plasma, the
444
+ geometric delay has a curious feature. Gravity and plasma compete
445
+ with each other, acting in opposite directions. Therefore, if the angle
446
+ of gravitational deflection and the angle of refraction exactly cancel
447
+ each other for some image, the trajectory becomes straight and the
448
+ geometric delay for this image can be equal to zero.
449
+ 4
450
+ PLASMA CORRECTIONS TO THE IMAGE
451
+ POSITIONS IN THE CASE OF SIS LENS
452
+ In this Section, we analytically calculate the plasma corrections to
453
+ image positions in strong lens system.
454
+ The simplest model suitable for description of lensing by a
455
+ galaxy or cluster is the singular isothermal sphere (SIS). For this lens
456
+ model we have the following density profile 휌푔푟푎푣, the deflection
457
+ angle ˆ훼푔푟푎푣, the Einstein radius 휃퐸 and the deflection potential
458
+ 휓(휃):
459
+ 휌푔푟푎푣 (푟) =
460
+ 휎2
461
+ 2휋퐺푟2 ,
462
+ ˆ훼푔푟푎푣 = 4휋 휎2
463
+ 푐2 ,
464
+ (12)
465
+ 휃퐸 = 4휋
466
+ � 휎
467
+
468
+ �2 퐷푑푠
469
+ 퐷푠
470
+ ,
471
+ 휓(휃) = 휃퐸 |휃| .
472
+ (13)
473
+ Here
474
+
475
+ is
476
+ the
477
+ velocity
478
+ dispersion.
479
+ For
480
+ more
481
+ de-
482
+ tails,
483
+ see,
484
+ e.g.,
485
+ Schneider, Ehlers & Falco
486
+ (1992),
487
+ Schneider, Kochanek & Wambsganss (2006), Dodelson (2017),
488
+ Congdon & Keeton (2018). For analytical studies of plasma effects
489
+ in strong lens systems with singular isothermal ellipsoid lens, we
490
+ refer to Crisnejo et al (2022); Crisnejo (2022); Ulla (2022).
491
+ We assume also that the gravitating lens is surrounded by
492
+ non-homogeneous spherically symmetric plasma, which leads to
493
+ the refractive deflection ˆ훼푟푒 푓 푟 of light ray. Our subsequent cal-
494
+ culations are appropriate for arbitrary law of plasma distribution.
495
+ In such an approach it becomes possible to: neglect the mass of
496
+ plasma particles, or take into account the gravity created by them.
497
+ In Sec.6 we will consider the example when the gravitating mass is
498
+ given by dark matter particles together with plasma particles, and
499
+ there is the additional refractive deflection on this plasma. Alterna-
500
+ tively, in frame of our approach, one could completely neglect the
501
+ contribution of plasma particles to total gravitating mass.
502
+ Having the deflection angle ˆ훼 in (1) as the function of impact
503
+ parameter 푏, we write 푏 = 퐷푑 ·|휃| and introduce the reduced angle
504
+ as
505
+ 훼(|휃|) = 퐷푑푠
506
+ 퐷푠
507
+ ˆ훼(퐷푑·|휃|) =
508
+ (14)
509
+ = 퐷푑푠
510
+ 퐷푠
511
+ ˆ훼푔푟푎푣 (퐷푑·|휃|) + 퐷푑푠
512
+ 퐷푠
513
+ ˆ훼푟푒 푓 푟 (퐷푑·|휃|) .
514
+ Here the expression 퐷푑 ·|휃| is the argument of the functions.
515
+ With the gravitational deflection angle ˆ훼푔푟푎푣 from (12) and
516
+ the Einstein angular radius 휃퐸 from (13), we find:
517
+ 훼(|휃|) = 휃퐸 − 퐵휔(|휃|) .
518
+ (15)
519
+ Here, for convenience, we have introduced the function
520
+ 퐵휔(|휃|) = − 퐷푑푠
521
+ 퐷푠
522
+ 훼푟푒 푓 푟 (퐷푑·|휃|) ,
523
+ (16)
524
+ which is positive for density profiles falling with radius and diverg-
525
+ ing refractive deflection. By physical meaning, 퐵휔(|휃|) is the re-
526
+ fractive deflection angle normalized by the distances ratio 퐷푑푠/퐷푠
527
+ and taken with opposite sign. Similar notation was used in our
528
+ previous paper (Tsupko & Bisnovatyi-Kogan 2020).
529
+ To correctly describe negative 휃, we write the lens equation
530
+ as (e.g., Suyu 2012; Schneider, Kochanek & Wambsganss 2006;
531
+ Tsupko & Bisnovatyi-Kogan 2020):
532
+ 훽 = 휃 − 훼(|휃|) 휃
533
+ |휃| .
534
+ (17)
535
+ MNRAS 000, 1–8 (2022)
536
+
537
+ Time delay induced by plasma in strong lens systems
538
+ 5
539
+ Finally, we have the lens equation with both gravitational and
540
+ refractive contributions as
541
+ 훽 = 휃 − 휃퐸
542
+
543
+ |휃| + 퐵휔(|휃|) 휃
544
+ |휃| .
545
+ (18)
546
+ In order to solve the lens equation completely analytically, we
547
+ will further also assume that the plasma effect is small compared to
548
+ gravity:
549
+ | ˆ훼푟푒 푓 푟 | ≪ | ˆ훼푔푟푎푣 | .
550
+ (19)
551
+ This leads to condition:
552
+ 퐵휔(|휃|) ≪ 휃퐸 .
553
+ (20)
554
+ With the condition (20), the equation (18) can be solved per-
555
+ turbatively. To do this, we introduce a bookkeeping parameter 휀
556
+ associated with plasma terms, expand on it in a series, and at the
557
+ end we will put it equal to unity. The equation (18) can be written
558
+ as
559
+ 훽 = 휃 − 휃퐸
560
+
561
+ |휃| + 휀퐵휔(|휃|) 휃
562
+ |휃| ,
563
+ (21)
564
+ and we look for a solution in the form of
565
+ 휃 = 휃 (0) + 휀 휃 (1) .
566
+ (22)
567
+ The zero-order term is a vacuum solution, and the first-order term
568
+ describes a linear correction due to plasma presence.
569
+ For 휃 > 0, the equation (21) becomes:
570
+ 훽 = 휃 − 휃퐸 + 휀퐵휔(휃) .
571
+ (23)
572
+ Substituting (22) into (23), we find for angular position 휃+ of the
573
+ primary image:
574
+ 휃 (0)
575
+ +
576
+ = 휃퐸 + 훽 ,
577
+ (24)
578
+ 휃 (1)
579
+ +
580
+ = −퐵+ ,
581
+ where 퐵+ ≡ 퐵휔(휃 (0)
582
+ + ) = 퐵휔(휃퐸 + 훽) ,
583
+ (25)
584
+ 휃+ = 휃퐸 + 훽 − 퐵+ .
585
+ (26)
586
+ Similarly, for the secondary image (휃− < 0) we find:
587
+ 휃 (0)
588
+
589
+ = −휃퐸 + 훽 ,
590
+ (27)
591
+ 휃 (1)
592
+
593
+ = 퐵− ,
594
+ where 퐵− ≡ 퐵휔(|휃 (0)
595
+ − |) = 퐵휔(휃퐸 − 훽) ,
596
+ (28)
597
+ 휃− = −휃퐸 + 훽 + 퐵− .
598
+ (29)
599
+ Solutions
600
+ of
601
+ zero-order
602
+ (vacuum)
603
+ are
604
+ known
605
+ from
606
+ the
607
+ literature
608
+ (Schneider, Ehlers & Falco
609
+ 1992;
610
+ Schneider, Kochanek & Wambsganss
611
+ 2006;
612
+ Dodelson
613
+ 2017;
614
+ Congdon & Keeton 2018). Here we find first-order plasma correc-
615
+ tions analytically. The secondary image exists only for 훽 < 휃퐸, as
616
+ can be seen from Eq.(27). With 훽 → 휃퐸, magnification factor of
617
+ secondary image goes to zero, and it disappears after 훽 becomes
618
+ bigger than 휃퐸, see, e.g., Dodelson (2017) for SIS lens in vacuum.
619
+ 5
620
+ TIME DELAY BETWEEN TWO IMAGES IN CASE OF
621
+ SIS LENS IN PRESENCE OF PLASMA
622
+ In this Section, we analytically calculate the time delay between
623
+ primary and secondary images for SIS lens surrounded by plasma.
624
+ With substitutions of Eq.(13), the general expression (10) for the
625
+ time delay becomes:
626
+ Δ푡(휃) = 퐷Δ푡
627
+
628
+ � 1
629
+ 2 (휃 − 훽)2 − 휃퐸 |휃|
630
+
631
+ + 1 + 푧푑
632
+
633
+ 퐾푒
634
+ 2휔2 푁푖푛푡 (|휃|) .
635
+ (30)
636
+ In order to find expressions for the time delay for a particu-
637
+ lar image, we must substitute the expressions (26) and (29) found
638
+ earlier. After substitution into (30), we keep terms of the first order
639
+ in plasma. By this way, we find the plasma corrections to all three
640
+ terms in (30). By coincidence, for this model of lens, linear plasma
641
+ corrections for geometrical and potential terms of time delay ex-
642
+ actly cancel each other. This happens because with the inclusion
643
+ of the plasma, the light deflection becomes smaller and ray goes
644
+ closer to the lens, so the geometric delay decreases but the potential
645
+ delay increases, and for this particular distribution of matter two
646
+ corrections are of the same magnitude but opposite signs. Finally,
647
+ for primary image we have:
648
+ Δ푡+ = 퐷Δ푡
649
+
650
+
651
+ −1
652
+ 2휃2
653
+ 퐸 − 휃퐸 훽
654
+
655
+ + 1 + 푧푑
656
+
657
+ 퐾푒
658
+ 2휔2 푁푖푛푡 (휃퐸 + 훽) ,
659
+ (31)
660
+ whereas for secondary image:
661
+ Δ푡− = 퐷Δ푡
662
+
663
+
664
+ −1
665
+ 2휃2
666
+ 퐸 + 휃퐸 훽
667
+
668
+ + 1 + 푧푑
669
+
670
+ 퐾푒
671
+ 2휔2 푁푖푛푡 (휃퐸 − 훽) .
672
+ (32)
673
+ Time delay between images is:
674
+ Δ푡+ − Δ푡− = 퐷Δ푡
675
+
676
+ (−2휃퐸 훽) +
677
+ (33)
678
+ + 1 + 푧푑
679
+
680
+ 퐾푒
681
+ 2휔2 [푁푖푛푡 (휃퐸 + 훽) − 푁푖푛푡 (휃퐸 − 훽)] .
682
+ Until now, we have only assumed that 훽 < 휃퐸 (in order for the
683
+ SIS lens to produce a secondary image). Let us now additionally
684
+ assume that 훽 ≪ 휃퐸. This will allow us to significantly simplify
685
+ the formulas.
686
+ First, we write approximately:
687
+ Δ푁푖푛푡 (휃퐸 + 훽) − Δ푁푖푛푡 (휃퐸 − 훽) ≃ 2훽 푑푁푖푛푡
688
+ 푑휃
689
+ ����휃=휃퐸
690
+ .
691
+ (34)
692
+ Second, we remind that the deflection angle for the pho-
693
+ ton
694
+ with
695
+ unperturbed
696
+ motion
697
+ along
698
+ 푧-axis
699
+ is
700
+ written
701
+ as
702
+ (Bisnovatyi-Kogan & Tsupko 2009, 2010, 2015):
703
+ ˆ훼푟푒 푓 푟 (푏) = 퐾푒
704
+ 2휔2
705
+
706
+
707
+ −∞
708
+ 휕푁
709
+ 휕푏 푑푧 .
710
+ (35)
711
+ Then, for positive 휃, we write 푏 = 퐷푑휃, and make the following
712
+ transformation:
713
+ 1 + 푧푑
714
+
715
+ 퐾푒
716
+ 2휔2 2훽 푑푁푖푛푡
717
+ 푑휃
718
+ = 1 + 푧푑
719
+
720
+ 2훽 퐷푑 ˆ훼푟푒 푓 푟 =
721
+ (36)
722
+ = 1 + 푧푑
723
+
724
+ 퐷푑퐷푠
725
+ 퐷푑푠
726
+ 퐷푑푠
727
+ 퐷푠
728
+ ˆ훼푟푒 푓 푟 2훽 = − 퐷Δ푡
729
+
730
+ 퐵(|휃|) 2훽 .
731
+ Finally, we find the compact expression for time delay between
732
+ primary and secondary images of SIS lens surrounded by plasma:
733
+ Δ푡+ − Δ푡− = − 퐷Δ푡
734
+
735
+ 2훽 [휃퐸 + 퐵휔(휃퐸)] .
736
+ (37)
737
+ MNRAS 000, 1–8 (2022)
738
+
739
+ 6
740
+ G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan and O. Yu. Tsupko
741
+ Here 퐷Δ푡 is given by Eq.(11), the variable 휃퐸 is the vacuum Einstein
742
+ radius of SIS lens (13), and the function 퐵휔 is defined in Eq.(16),
743
+ where ˆ훼푟푒 푓 푟 is supposed to be known as the function of 푏.
744
+ Measuring the time delay between images allows one to
745
+ determine the Hubble constant. Lens parameters from right-
746
+ hand side of Eq.(37) are found from observations and mod-
747
+ elling of the lens system. Time-delay distance (11) is in-
748
+ versely proportional to Hubble constant (Refsdal 1964; Schneider
749
+ 1985; Schneider, Kochanek & Wambsganss 2006; Suyu et al 2010;
750
+ Wong et al 2020):
751
+ 퐷Δ푡 ∝ 1
752
+ 퐻0
753
+ .
754
+ (38)
755
+ As a result, the value of Hubble constant estimated from time de-
756
+ lay measurements becomes a bit bigger if the plasma presence is
757
+ taken into account. It should be noted however that results may vary,
758
+ because here the simple model is considered, where plasma correc-
759
+ tions to geometrical and potential terms are exactly cancelled. In
760
+ more realistic models, the result will depend on signs and contribu-
761
+ tions of plasma corrections in all three terms of time delay.
762
+ In order to determine the Hubble constant, we need to measure
763
+ the time delay (Δ푡+ −Δ푡−) between images. All values (except 퐷Δ푡)
764
+ in the right-hand side of the eq.(37) are found from modeling the
765
+ mass distribution in the lens based on observational data. Thus,
766
+ from eq.(37), the time delay distance 퐷Δ푡 can be calculated, and,
767
+ correspondingly, we are able to find the Hubble constant 퐻0. See,
768
+ e.g., Suyu et al (2018).
769
+ 6
770
+ EXAMPLE OF CALCULATION
771
+ Let us write the corresponding formulas for non-homogeneous
772
+ plasma with power-law number density:
773
+ 푁(푟) = 푁0
774
+ �푟0
775
+
776
+ � 푘
777
+ ,
778
+ (39)
779
+ where
780
+ 푁0 = const, 푟0 = const, 푘 = const > 1 .
781
+ (40)
782
+ In order to calculate the refractive deflection ˆ훼푟푒 푓 푟 (푏) by for-
783
+ mula (35), one needs to substitute 푟 = (푏2 + 푧2)1/2, take a
784
+ partial derivative by 푏 and then integrate on 푧. It results in
785
+ (Bisnovatyi-Kogan & Tsupko 2009, 2010, 2015; Bliokh & Minakov
786
+ 1989):
787
+ ˆ훼푟푒 푓 푟 (푏) = − 퐾푒
788
+ 휔2
789
+ √휋 Γ
790
+
791
+
792
+ 2 + 1
793
+ 2
794
+
795
+ Γ
796
+
797
+
798
+ 2
799
+
800
+ 푁0
801
+ �푟0
802
+
803
+ � 푘
804
+ ,
805
+ (41)
806
+ with Γ-function
807
+ Γ(푥) =
808
+
809
+
810
+ 0
811
+ 푡푥−1푒−푡 푑푡 .
812
+ (42)
813
+ Correspondingly, the function 퐵휔(|휃|) which characterizes the
814
+ plasma influence is:
815
+ 퐵휔(|휃|) = 퐷푑푠
816
+ 퐷푠
817
+ 퐾푒
818
+ 휔2
819
+ √휋 Γ
820
+
821
+
822
+ 2 + 1
823
+ 2
824
+
825
+ Γ
826
+
827
+
828
+ 2
829
+
830
+ 푁0
831
+
832
+ 푟0
833
+ 퐷푑 ·|휃|
834
+ � 푘
835
+ .
836
+ (43)
837
+ For example, for 푘 = 2 we have:
838
+ ˆ훼푟푒 푓 푟 (푏) = − 퐾푒휋
839
+ 2휔2 푁0
840
+ �푟0
841
+
842
+ �2
843
+ ,
844
+ (44)
845
+ 퐵휔(|휃|) = 퐷푑푠
846
+ 퐷푠
847
+ 퐾푒휋
848
+ 2휔2 푁0
849
+ 푟2
850
+ 0
851
+ 퐷2
852
+ 푑|휃|2 .
853
+ (45)
854
+ As a numerical example, let us consider SIS lens with density
855
+ distribution (12) at redshift 푧푑 = 0.5 and the source at some further
856
+ redshift. Corresponding value of 퐷푑 is calculated with the following
857
+ cosmological parameters: 퐻0 = 70 (km/s)/Mpc, Ω푚0 = 0.3, ΩΛ0 =
858
+ 0.7. Distances 퐷푠 and 퐷푑푠 are not specified. With typical value
859
+ 휎 = 200 km/s we find:
860
+ 휃퐸 = 1.15′′ 퐷푑푠
861
+ 퐷푠
862
+ .
863
+ (46)
864
+ Let us consider the simplest case. The distribution of gravi-
865
+ tating matter is given by (12), and we assume that the plasma has
866
+ the same (up to constant coefficient) distribution as the rest of the
867
+ matter, see Bisnovatyi-Kogan & Tsupko (2010):
868
+ 푁(푟) = 휌푔푟푎푣 (푟)
869
+ 휅푚푝
870
+ .
871
+ (47)
872
+ Here coefficient 휅 ≃ 6 characterizes the contribution of plasma
873
+ particles in comparison with other components of matter; 푚푝 is
874
+ the proton mass. For more details, see Eq.(61) and Eq.(62) in
875
+ Bisnovatyi-Kogan & Tsupko (2010).
876
+ Refractive deflection produced by inhomogeneous plasma with
877
+ number density (47) equals to (Bisnovatyi-Kogan & Tsupko 2010):
878
+ ˆ훼푟푒 푓 푟 (푏) = −1
879
+ 4
880
+ 퐾푒
881
+ 휅푚푝
882
+ 휎2
883
+ 퐺휔2푏2 .
884
+ (48)
885
+ Correspondingly, according to Eq.(16), the function 퐵휔(|휃|)
886
+ which characterizes the plasma influence is:
887
+ 퐵휔(|휃|) = 1
888
+ 4
889
+ 퐷푑푠
890
+ 퐷푠퐷2
891
+
892
+ 퐾푒
893
+ 휅푚푝
894
+ 휎2
895
+ 퐺휔2|휃|2 .
896
+ (49)
897
+ With the frequency of the observation 휈0 = 327 × 106 Hz, we
898
+ write 휔0 = 2휋휈0 and 휔 = (1 + 푧푑) 휔0, and find:
899
+ 퐵휔(휃퐸) = 0.000054′′ 퐷푑푠
900
+ 퐷푠
901
+ .
902
+ (50)
903
+ The rays forming the images have impact parameter of the
904
+ order of 푏 = 휃퐸 퐷푑. At given values of other parameters, we obtain
905
+ that near the lens the ray passes through the number density 푁푒 of
906
+ about 0.5 cm−3. For bigger plasma densities, the bigger values of
907
+ plasma influence can be expected. See, e.g., Er & Mao (2014) who
908
+ have considered the number densities about 10 cm−3.
909
+ 7
910
+ CONCLUSIONS
911
+ (i) The time delay in strong lens systems surrounded by plasma envi-
912
+ ronment is investigated in analytical way. We take into account three
913
+ components of the time delay, as compared to straight-line propaga-
914
+ tion: the geometrical delay, the potential delay in the gravitational
915
+ field, dispersion delay in the plasma. See Eq.(10).
916
+ (ii) Strong lens system is modelled by the singular isothermal
917
+ sphere model. Plasma refractive deflection is taken into account
918
+ in the form of small correction to gravitational deflection. Plasma
919
+ corrections to image positions are found analytically, see Eqs. (26),
920
+ (29). The effect is negligibly small in the optical range, but can be
921
+ more significant in the radio range.
922
+ MNRAS 000, 1–8 (2022)
923
+
924
+ Time delay induced by plasma in strong lens systems
925
+ 7
926
+ (iii) Analytical expression is derived for the time delay be-
927
+ tween two images in case of SIS lens surrounded by arbitrarily
928
+ distributed spherically symmetric plasma, see Eq.(37). This allows
929
+ one to estimate simply the plasma effects for the particular lens.
930
+ (iv) If the difference in image positions in different bands
931
+ is observable for lens under consideration, this indicates that the
932
+ plasma effects need to be taken into account in the lens modeling
933
+ and further applications.
934
+ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
935
+ This article is partially supported by the Russian Foundation for
936
+ Basic Research, project No. 20-52-12053.
937
+ DATA AVAILABILITY
938
+ Data availability is not applicable to this article as no new data were
939
+ created or analysed in this study.
940
+ REFERENCES
941
+ Babar G. Z., Babar A. Z. and Atamurotov F., 2020, European Phys. J. C, 80,
942
+ 761
943
+ Badía J., Eiroa E. F., 2021, Phys. Rev. D, 104, 084055
944
+ Badía J., Eiroa E. F., 2022, preprint (arXiv:2210.03081)
945
+ Bezděková B., Perlick V. and Bičák J., 2022, Journal of Mathematical
946
+ Physics, 63, 092501
947
+ Bičák J., Hadrava P., 1975, A&A, 44, 389
948
+ Bisnovatyi-Kogan G. S., Tsupko O. Yu., 2008, Astrophysics, 51, 99
949
+ Bisnovatyi-Kogan G. S., Tsupko O. Yu., 2009, Gravitation and Cosmology,
950
+ 15, 20
951
+ Bisnovatyi-Kogan G. S., Tsupko O. Yu., 2010, MNRAS, 404, 1790
952
+ Bisnovatyi-Kogan G. S., Tsupko O. Yu., 2015, Plasma Phys. Rep., 41, 562
953
+ Bisnovatyi-Kogan G. S., Tsupko O. Yu., 2017, Universe, 3, 57
954
+ Bliokh P. V., Minakov A. A., 1989, Gravitational Lenses. Naukova Dumka,
955
+ Kiev (in Russian)
956
+ Bozza V., Capozziello S., Iovane G., Scarpetta G., 2001, Gener. Relativ.
957
+ Gravit., 33, 1535
958
+ Breuer R. A., Ehlers J., 1980, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 370, 389
959
+ Breuer R. A., Ehlers J., 1981a, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 374, 65
960
+ Breuer R. A., Ehlers J., 1981b, A&A, 96, 293
961
+ Briozzo G., Gallo E., 2022, preprint (arXiv:2206.14598)
962
+ Briozzo G., Gallo E., Mädler T., 2022, preprint (arXiv:2211.05620)
963
+ Broderick A., Blandford R., 2003a, MNRAS, 342, 1280
964
+ Broderick A., Blandford R., 2003b, Ap&SS, 288, 161
965
+ Beloborodov A. M., 2002, ApJ, 566, L85
966
+ Chainakun P., Watcharangkool A., Young A. J., 2022, MNRAS, 512, 728
967
+ Chowdhuri A., Bhattacharyya A., 2021, Phys. Rev. D, 104, 064039
968
+ Clegg A. W., Fey A. L., Lazio T. J. W., 1998, ApJ, 496, 253
969
+ Congdon A. B., Keeton C., 2018, Principles of Gravitational Lensing: Light
970
+ Deflection as a Probe of Astrophysics and Cosmology, Springer Inter-
971
+ national Publishing
972
+ Cordes J. M., Wasserman I., Hessels J. W. T., Lazio T. J. W., Chatterjee S.,
973
+ and Wharton R. S., 2017, ApJ, 842, 35
974
+ Crisnejo G., Gallo E., 2018, Phys. Rev. D, 97, 124016
975
+ Crisnejo G., Gallo E., Boero E. F., and Moreschi O., 2022 (to appear)
976
+ Crisnejo G., Gallo E., Jusufi K., 2019, preprint (arXiv: 1910.02030)
977
+ Crisnejo G., Gallo E., Rogers A., 2019, Phys. Rev. D, 99, 124001
978
+ Crisnejo G., 2022, Influencia de plasmas astrofísicos en la desviación de
979
+ la luz, PhD Thesis, advisor Emanuel Gallo, Universidad Nacional de
980
+ Córdoba
981
+ Cunha P. V. P. and Herdeiro C. A. R., 2018, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 50, 42
982
+ Darwin Ch., 1959, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A,
983
+ Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 249, 180
984
+ Dodelson S., 2017, Gravitational Lensing, Cambridge University Press,
985
+ Cambridge, UK
986
+ Dong L., Petropoulou M., Giannios D., 2018, MNRAS, 481, 2685
987
+ Er X., Mao S., 2014, MNRAS, 437, 2180
988
+ Er X., Mao S., 2022, MNRAS, 516, 2218
989
+ Er X., Rogers A., 2018, MNRAS, 475, 867
990
+ Er X., Rogers A., 2019, MNRAS, 488, 5651
991
+ Er X., Yang Y.-P., Rogers A., 2020, ApJ, 889, 158
992
+ Falcke H., Melia F., and Agol E., 2000, ApJ, 528, L13
993
+ Guerrieri A., Novello M., 2022, Class. Quantum Gravity, 39, 245008
994
+ Hackmann E. and Dhani A., 2019, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 51, 37
995
+ Huang Y., Dong Y.-P., Liu D.-J., 2018, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 27, 1850114
996
+ Javed W., Abbas J., and Övgün A., 2019, Phys. Rev. D, 100, 044052
997
+ Kimpson T., Wu K., Zane S., 2019a, MNRAS, 484, 2411
998
+ Kimpson T., Wu K., Zane S., 2019b, MNRAS, 486, 360
999
+ Kulsrud R. and Loeb A., 1992, Phys. Rev. D, 45, 525
1000
+ Kumar P., Beniamini P., 2022, preprint (arXiv: 2208.03332)
1001
+ Li Q., Zhu Y., Wang T., 2022, The European Physical Journal C, 82, 2
1002
+ Matsuno K., 2021, Phys. Rev. D, 103, 044008
1003
+ Morozova V. S., Ahmedov B. J., Tursunov A. A., 2013, Ap&SS, 346, 513
1004
+ Muhleman D. O., Ekers R. D., Fomalont E. B., 1970, Phys. Rev. Lett., 24,
1005
+ 1377
1006
+ Muhleman D. O., Johnston I. D., 1966, Phys. Rev. Lett., 17, 455
1007
+ Perlick V., 2000, Ray Optics, Fermat’s Principle and Applications to General
1008
+ Relativity. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany
1009
+ Perlick V., 2004, Living Rev. Relativ., 7, 9
1010
+ Perlick V., Tsupko O. Yu., 2017, Phys. Rev. D, 95, 104003
1011
+ Perlick V., Tsupko O. Yu., 2022, Physics Reports, 947, 1
1012
+ Perlick V., Tsupko O. Yu., Bisnovatyi-Kogan G. S., 2015, Phys. Rev. D, 92,
1013
+ 104031
1014
+ Refsdal S., 1964, MNRAS, 128, 307
1015
+ Rogers A., 2015, MNRAS, 451, 17
1016
+ Rogers A., 2016, preprint (arXiv:1611.00076)
1017
+ Rogers A., 2017a, MNRAS, 465, 2151
1018
+ Rogers A., 2017b, Universe, 3, 3
1019
+ Rogers A., Er X., 2019, MNRAS, 485, 5800
1020
+ Sárený M., Balek V., 2019, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 51, 141
1021
+ Schneider P., 1985, A&A, 143, 413
1022
+ Schneider P., Ehlers J., Falco E., 1992, Gravitational Lenses (Springer-Verlag
1023
+ Berlin Heidelberg)
1024
+ Schneider P., Kochanek C. S., Wambsganss J., 2006, Gravitational Lensing:
1025
+ Strong, Weak and Micro, Swiss Society for Astrophysics and Astronomy
1026
+ Series: Saas-Fee Advanced Courses, Number 33, Springer, Berlin
1027
+ Schulze-Koops K., Perlick V., Schwarz D. J., 2017, Class. Quantum Gravity,
1028
+ 34, 215006
1029
+ Shapiro I. I., 1964, Phys. Rev. Lett., 13, 789
1030
+ Sun J., Er X., Tsupko O. Yu., 2022, preprint (arXiv:2211.13442)
1031
+ Suyu S. H., 2012, MNRAS, 426, 868
1032
+ Suyu S. H., Chang T.-C., Courbin F., and Okumura T., 2018, Space Science
1033
+ Reviews, 214, 91
1034
+ Suyu S. H., Marshall P. J., Auger M. W., et al, 2010, ApJ, 711, 201
1035
+ Synge J. L., 1960, Relativity: the General Theory. North-Holland Publishing
1036
+ Company, Amsterdam
1037
+ Tsupko O. Yu., Bisnovatyi-Kogan G. S., 2013, Phys. Rev. D, 87, 124009
1038
+ Tsupko O. Yu., Bisnovatyi-Kogan G. S., Rogers A. and Er X., 2020, Class.
1039
+ Quantum Grav. 37, 205017
1040
+ Tsupko O. Yu., 2021, Phys. Rev. D, 103, 104019
1041
+ Tsupko O. Yu., Bisnovatyi-Kogan G. S., 2020, MNRAS, 491, 5636
1042
+ Tuntsov A. V., Walker M. A., Koopmans L. V. E., et al, 2016, ApJ, 817, 176
1043
+ Turyshev S. G., Toth V. T., 2019a, Journal of Optics, 21, 045601
1044
+ Turyshev S. G., Toth V. T., 2019b, Phys. Rev. D, 99, 024044
1045
+ UllaT. A., 2022, Efectos deentornos plasmáticos enel régimen de lentegrav-
1046
+ itacional fuerte, Undergraduate Thesis, advisor Emanuel Gallo, Univer-
1047
+ sidad Nacional de Córdoba
1048
+ Vedantham H. K., Readhead A. C. S., Hovatta T., et al, 2017, ApJ, 845, 90
1049
+ Virbhadra K. S., Ellis G. F. R., 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 62, 084003
1050
+ Wagner J., Er X., 2020, preprint (arXiv:2006.16263)
1051
+ Wong K. C., Suyu S. H., Chen G. C.-F., et al, 2020, MNRAS, 498, 1420
1052
+ MNRAS 000, 1–8 (2022)
1053
+
1054
+ 8
1055
+ G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan and O. Yu. Tsupko
1056
+ Yan H., 2019, Phys. Rev. D, 99, 084050
1057
+ Zhang Z., Yan H., Guo M., Chen B., 2022, preprint (arXiv:2206.04430)
1058
+ This paper has been typeset from a TEX/LATEX file prepared by the author.
1059
+ MNRAS 000, 1–8 (2022)
1060
+
8NAyT4oBgHgl3EQfQvar/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
9NAyT4oBgHgl3EQf3Plu/content/tmp_files/2301.00765v1.pdf.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
9NAyT4oBgHgl3EQf3Plu/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
A9AzT4oBgHgl3EQfTPz-/content/tmp_files/2301.01248v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1421 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Capturing near-field circular dichroism enhancements from far-field measurements
2
+ Jorge Olmos-Trigo,1, 2, ∗ Jon Lasa-Alonso,1, 2 Iker G´omez-Viloria,2 Gabriel Molina-Terriza,1, 2, 3 and Aitzol Garc´ıa-Etxarri1, 3
3
+ 1Donostia International Physics Center, Paseo Manuel de Lardizabal 4, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.
4
+ 2Centro de F´ısica de Materiales, Paseo Manuel de Lardizabal 5, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain.
5
+ 3IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Mar´ıa D´ıaz de Haro 3, 48013 Bilbao, Spain.
6
+ Molecular Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy faces significant limitations due to the inherent weakness
7
+ of chiroptical light-matter interactions. In this view, resonant optical antennas constitute a promising solution
8
+ to this problem since they can be tuned to increase the CD enhancement factor, fCD, a magnitude describing
9
+ the electromagnetic near-field enhancement of scatterers associated with a given helicity. Here, we derive an
10
+ exact multipolar expansion of fCD, which is valid to deduce the integrated near-field CD enhancements of chiral
11
+ molecules in the presence of scatterers of any size and shape under general illumination conditions. Based on
12
+ our analytical findings, we show that the near-field fCD factor can be related to magnitudes that can be computed
13
+ in the far-field, i.e., the scattering cross-section and the helicity expectation value. Moreover, we show that in
14
+ the case of lossless cylindrically symmetric samples, the near-field fCD factor can be inferred experimentally
15
+ only from two far-field measurements at specific scattering angles. Our contribution paves the way for the
16
+ experimental characterization of devices capable of enhancing molecular CD spectroscopy.
17
+ Chirality is a geometrical property of objects which are not
18
+ superimposable with its mirror image. Chiral objects are ubiq-
19
+ uitous in nature. Many organic molecules, such as glucose and
20
+ most biological amino acids, are chiral. Not to mention the
21
+ DNA double helix, which, in its standard form, always twists
22
+ like a right-handed screw [1].
23
+ In the pharmaceutical industry, chiral specificity is criti-
24
+ cal because opposite enantiomers, i.e., mirror pairs of chiral
25
+ molecules, can have beneficial or detrimental biological ef-
26
+ fects on our organism depending on their handedness. Perhaps
27
+ the most representative case of this is the so-called “Thalido-
28
+ mide tragedy” which took place during the late 50s [2].
29
+ Thalidomide was extensively prescribed to pregnant women
30
+ due to its benefits in alleviating nausea. Instead, this drug
31
+ prevented the proper growth of the fetus [3]. The outcome
32
+ was that thousands of infants were born with severe congenital
33
+ malformations. That fatality occurred because Thalidomide is
34
+ a chiral molecule that was marketed as a 50/50 mixture of R
35
+ and S enantiomers. While the S enantiomer is effective in alle-
36
+ viating nausea, the R enantiomer is toxic. Thus, drugs consist-
37
+ ing of chiral molecules may indeed have different therapeutic
38
+ or toxicological effects.
39
+ Even if they share the same atomic composition, enan-
40
+ tiomer pairs are indistinguishable when measuring their scalar
41
+ molecular properties.
42
+ Their chiral nature is revealed only
43
+ when interacting with other chiral entities.
44
+ In electromag-
45
+ netism, the most common chiral observable is helicity [4].
46
+ Chiral molecules show a preferential absorption for fields of
47
+ opposite helicities (left or right-handed polarized waves with
48
+ helicity eigenvalues of σ = ±1, respectively). In a conven-
49
+ tional Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy setup, a chiral
50
+ molecular solution is sequentially illuminated by fields of op-
51
+ posite helicities, and the total transmitted power is recorded
52
+ for each case. The CD signal is then computed by taking the
53
+ difference between these two power measurements in trans-
54
+ mission. However, the inherent weakness of chiroptical re-
55
+ sponses strongly limits the sensitivity of CD spectroscopy.
56
57
+ Optical antennas, designed to control the properties of
58
+ light [5], are promising candidates to enhance the spectro-
59
+ scopic signals of chiral samples. The underlying phenomenon
60
+ is that optical antennas can be engineered to enhance elec-
61
+ tromagnetic fields while preserving the electromagnetic helic-
62
+ ity [6–8]. Many works have explored optical antennas [9–11]
63
+ and metasurfaces, namely, flat planar arrays of optical anten-
64
+ nas, made of metallic [12–14] or/and high refractive index
65
+ materials [15, 16] for enhanced chiral sensing [17, 18]. Ex-
66
+ amples of such works can be found, for instance, in the ultra-
67
+ violet [19], visible [20–26] or near -and far-infrared spectral
68
+ range [27–33]. Moreover and quite recently, optical cavities
69
+ have been also proposed as efficient platforms for enhanced
70
+ chiral sensing [34–36].
71
+ However, researchers rely exclusively on numerical meth-
72
+ ods to design enhanced chiral sensing devices, as capturing
73
+ the vector character of the near-field contribution can be chal-
74
+ lenging. Here, we derive an exact multipolar expansion of fCD,
75
+ which is valid to deduce the integrated near-field CD enhance-
76
+ ments of chiral molecules in the presence of scatterers of any
77
+ size and shape under general illumination conditions. From
78
+ our analytical results, we show that fCD is proportional to
79
+ the scattering cross-section and the helicity expectation value,
80
+ which are experimentally measurable magnitudes in the far-
81
+ field. In addition to this, we also show that for lossless and
82
+ cylindrically symmetric scatterers, it is possible to infer the
83
+ fCD factor only with two far-field measurements: the extinc-
84
+ tion cross-section and the helicity density at specific scattering
85
+ angles.
86
+ To describe the excitation of chiral molecules, we adopt the
87
+ formalism introduced by Tang and Cohen [37]. The CD signal
88
+ of a chiral molecule under the illumination of a well-defined
89
+ helicity field (σ = ±1) can be computed in vacuum as
90
+ CDinc(r) = −4
91
+ ε Im{G}Cσ
92
+ inc(r),
93
+ (1)
94
+ where G is the chiral polarizability of the molecule and Cσ
95
+ inc(r)
96
+ is the incident local density of optical chirality [38],
97
+
98
+ inc(r) = kε
99
+ 2 Im{Eσ
100
+ inc(r)·ZHσ
101
+ inc
102
+ ∗(r)}.
103
+ (2)
104
+ arXiv:2301.01248v1 [physics.optics] 3 Jan 2023
105
+
106
+ 2
107
+ Here, k is the radiation wavevector, ε is the electric per-
108
+ mittivity of the medium and Z =
109
+
110
+ µ/ε its electromagnetic
111
+ impedance. Moreover, Eσ
112
+ inc(r) and Hσ
113
+ inc(r) refer to incident
114
+ electromagnetic fields with well-defined helicity [39] (see Ap-
115
+ pendix A 1 for more details).
116
+ In the presence of achiral antennas (see Fig. 1) and in
117
+ the helicity basis [40], the total electromagnetic fields can
118
+ be generally written as Eσσ′
119
+ tot (r) = Eσσ′
120
+ sca (r) + Eσ
121
+ inc(r)δσσ′.
122
+ Here Eσσ′
123
+ sca (r) is the scattered electromagnetic field written in
124
+ terms of the electromagnetic modes with well defined helic-
125
+ ity σ′ = ±1 (see Appendix A 2 for more details). In analogy
126
+ with Eq. (1), we can express the total CD signal of a chiral
127
+ molecule in the presence of an achiral optical antenna as [41]
128
+ CDtot(r) = −4
129
+ ε Im{G}Cσ
130
+ tot(r) = k
131
+ 2Im{G} ∑
132
+ σ′=±1
133
+ σ′|Eσσ′
134
+ tot (r)|2.
135
+ (3)
136
+ We seek to maximize CDtot(r) with Eq. (3). However, such
137
+ enhancements cannot be achieved through G since it is a fixed
138
+ chiral molecular parameter that cannot be engineered upon
139
+ illumination. In contrast, the total density of optical chiral-
140
+ ity, Cσ
141
+ tot(r), can be tuned to enhance light-matter interactions
142
+ and thus, increase the sensitivity of CD spectroscopy [42].
143
+ To get a deeper insight into the total density of optical chi-
144
+ rality, let us split Cσ
145
+ tot(r) into three contributions; namely,
146
+
147
+ tot(r) = Cσ
148
+ inc(r)+Cσ
149
+ sca(r)+Cσ
150
+ int(r), with
151
+
152
+ inc(r) = σ|Eσ
153
+ inc(r)|2,
154
+ (4)
155
+
156
+ sca(r) = |Eσ+
157
+ sca (r)|2 −|Eσ−
158
+ sca (r)|2,
159
+ (5)
160
+
161
+ int(r) = 2σRe{Eσ
162
+ inc
163
+ ∗(r)·Eσσ
164
+ sca (r)}.
165
+ (6)
166
+ It is experimentally challenging to place enantiomers at
167
+ will, namely, at a desired spatial coordinate r. Accordingly,
168
+ it is more convenient to introduce an averaged expression of
169
+ the local CD enhancement factor that gives insight into how
170
+ efficient the nanoantenna might be at enhancing CD spec-
171
+ troscopy [31]. To that end, let us first integrate both Eq. (1)
172
+ and Eq. (3) over an imaginary sphere of radius r surrounding
173
+ the achiral antenna to calculate then the ratio between these
174
+ integrals, namely,
175
+ fCD =
176
+ � CDtot(r)dS
177
+ � CDinc(r)dS = 1+
178
+ � Cσ
179
+ sca(r)dS+
180
+ � Cσ
181
+ int(r)dS
182
+ � Cσ
183
+ inc(r)dS
184
+ ,
185
+ (7)
186
+ where dS = r2 sinθdϕdθ. To compute Eq. (7), we need the
187
+ orthogonality relations that the incident and scattered elec-
188
+ tromagnetic fields satisfy when written in terms of the mul-
189
+ tipoles with well-defined helicity. Fortunately, these can be
190
+ derived from Jackson’s book in its third edition [43] (see Ap-
191
+ pendix B 1 for the explicit derivation). Now, by considering
192
+ these relations, and after some algebra (see Appendix B 2 for
193
+ more details), we arrive at
194
+ fCD = 1+
195
+ ˜Cσ
196
+ sca + ˜Cσ
197
+ int
198
+ ˜Cσ
199
+ inc
200
+ ,
201
+ (8)
202
+ FIG. 1.
203
+ Scattering process in which an incident field with well-
204
+ defined helicity (red beam with σ = +1) impinges on an achiral an-
205
+ tenna, represented by a glossy cube. Both R-and-S Thalomide enan-
206
+ tiomers are also depicted close to the achiral antenna.
207
+ where
208
+ ˜Cσ
209
+ inc = σ ∑
210
+ lm
211
+ |Cσ
212
+ lm|2Gjl jl,
213
+ (9)
214
+ ˜Cσ
215
+ sca = σ ∑
216
+ lm
217
+ |Cσ
218
+ lm|2Re{almblm∗}Ghlhl,
219
+ (10)
220
+ ˜Cσ
221
+ int = σ ∑
222
+ lm
223
+ |Cσ
224
+ lm|2Re{(alm +blm)G jlhl}.
225
+ (11)
226
+ Here ˜C denotes the average of C over a spherical surface, alm
227
+ and blm are the so-called electric and magnetic scattering coef-
228
+ ficients of an arbitrary sample while Cσ
229
+ lm denotes the incident
230
+ coefficients characterizing the nature of the wave. Moreover,
231
+ G flgl = 1
232
+ 2
233
+
234
+ 2 f ∗
235
+ l (u)gl(u)+ 1
236
+ u2
237
+
238
+ ∂u
239
+
240
+ uf ∗
241
+ l (u) ∂
242
+ ∂u (ugl(u))
243
+ ��
244
+ .
245
+ (12)
246
+ Here G flgl is a scalar function that depends on spherical Bessel
247
+ and Hankel functions. In particular, we may have {fl,gl} =
248
+ {jl, jl},{ jl,hl},{hl,hl}, jl and hl being the spherical Bessel
249
+ and Hankel functions, respetively [43]. Moreover, notice that
250
+ u = kr is the radius of the imaginary sphere, normalized by
251
+ λ/2π, surrounding the object where the averaging integral is
252
+ performed. For more details, please check Appendix B 1.
253
+ Equation (8), together with Eqs. (9)-(12), is the first main
254
+ result of this paper. These equations describe the integrated
255
+ CD enhancement in the presence of scatterers of any size and
256
+ shape under the excitation of fields with well-defined helicity.
257
+ Our results overcome previous approximations, such as the
258
+ widely used system of a circularly-polarized plane-wave illu-
259
+ minating dipolar objects [22–33]. Thus, our findings may find
260
+ applications in chiral sensing and chiral spectroscopy tech-
261
+ niques beyond the current state-of-the-art.
262
+ At this point and for didactic purposes, we provide the steps
263
+ to find fCD around any optical antenna, which can be organized
264
+ as follows:
265
+ 1. First, we need the solution of the electromagnetic fields
266
+ under the illumination of a well-defined helicity beam.
267
+ These can be obtained by any Maxwell’s solver [44].
268
+
269
+ AAL3
270
+ FIG. 2. Circular dichroism enhancements for a multipolar sphere
271
+ under the illumination of a circularly polarized plane-wave. a) fCD
272
+ (exact) and b) fCD − ˜Cσ
273
+ int/ ˜Cσ
274
+ inc (scattering). Here u = x + δx, with
275
+ δx ≪ 1, being x = ka the optical size and m the index contrast.
276
+ 2. Then, we project in the far field the exact solution of the
277
+ electromagnetic fields scattered by the object to obtain
278
+ the scattering coefficients (see Eq. (9.123) in Jackson’s
279
+ book in its third edition [43]). For convenience, we pro-
280
+ vide in Appendix C the conversion between our scatter-
281
+ ing coefficients alm and blm to the ones employed in
282
+ Jackson’s book. Also notice that for spherical objects,
283
+ we might use Mie’s theory to directly jump to step 3.
284
+ 3. Finally, we can compute fCD via Eq. (8), together with
285
+ Eqs. (9)-(12).
286
+ As an illustrative example of the abovementioned recipe,
287
+ we depict the exact expression of fCD for a sphere sustain-
288
+ ing several multipoles under plane-wave illumination (see
289
+ Fig. 2a)). Moreover, we also depict in Fig. 2b) the scattering
290
+ contribution to fCD. That is, fCD − ˜Cσ
291
+ int/ ˜Cσ
292
+ inc. In fact, we infer,
293
+ by comparing Fig. 2a) with Fig. 2b), that the exact solution of
294
+ fCD can be fairly approximated to just scattering in near-field,
295
+ namely, fCD ∼ 1+ ˜Cσ
296
+ sca/ ˜Cσ
297
+ inc. Now, we understand the validity
298
+ of this approximation based on the following facts:
299
+ • On mathematical grounds, and according to Eq. (B3),
300
+ it can be checked that Ghlhl ≫ |G jlhl| for u < l. That
301
+ is, fundamental properties of spherical Bessel functions
302
+ dictate that the scattering contribution dominates over
303
+ the interference term for u < l.
304
+ • On physical grounds, we notice that there are no strong
305
+ resonances of the l-th multipole for u > l. For example,
306
+ dipolar and quadrupolar resonances typically arise for
307
+ u < 1 and 1 < u < 2, respectively [45].
308
+ At this point, we will delve into Eq. (10), which approxi-
309
+ mates the efficiency of an optical antenna to enhance the fCD
310
+ factor, as it has just been previously explained. In particu-
311
+ lar, let us examine its physical meaning when just one mul-
312
+ tipole order (electric and magnetic) contributes to the opti-
313
+ cal response of the antenna. In this regard, it is essential to
314
+ note that the one multipole approximation includes the most
315
+ studied scenario by the nanophotonic community devoted to
316
+ enhanced chiral sensing: a circularly polarized plane wave in-
317
+ cident on dipolar objects [22–33]. Now, when the scattering
318
+ can be described by just one multipole order, l, Eq. (10) reads
319
+ ˜Cσ
320
+ sca = σGhlhl
321
+ m=l
322
+
323
+ m=−l
324
+ |Cσ
325
+ lm|2Re{almblm∗},
326
+ (13)
327
+ By inspecting Eq. (13), we notice that ˜Cσ
328
+ sca is proportional
329
+ to the interference between the electric and magnetic scatter-
330
+ ing coefficients Re{almblm∗}. Now, let us introduce the nor-
331
+ malized (and unit-less) electromagnetic helicity expectation
332
+ value, which reads [46–48]
333
+ ⟨Λ⟩ =
334
+
335
+
336
+
337
+ |Eσ+
338
+ sca |2 −|Eσ−
339
+ sca |2�
340
+ dΩ
341
+
342
+
343
+
344
+ |Eσ+
345
+ sca |2 +|Eσ−
346
+ sca |2�
347
+ dΩ.
348
+ (14)
349
+ Computing ⟨Λ⟩ in the case in which the optical response can
350
+ be described by a single multipolar order l [46–48], we obtain
351
+ ⟨Λ⟩ = 2σ
352
+ ∑m |Cσ
353
+ lm|2Re{almblm∗}
354
+ ∑m |Cσ
355
+ lm|2 (|alm|2 +|blm|2) = σ ∑m |Cσ
356
+ lm|Re{almblm∗}
357
+ k2σsca
358
+ ,
359
+ (15)
360
+ where σsca is the scattering cross section [49]. At this point,
361
+ we notice that the expression for ˜Cσ
362
+ sca resembles ⟨Λ⟩.
363
+ In
364
+ fact and without loss of generality, we can write ˜Cσ
365
+ sca =
366
+ Ghlhl⟨Λ⟩k2σsca. As a result, fCD yields
367
+ fCD ∼ 1+
368
+ ˜Cσ
369
+ sca
370
+ ˜Cσ
371
+ inc
372
+ = 1+ Ghlhl⟨Λ⟩k2σsca
373
+ ˜Cσ
374
+ inc
375
+ .
376
+ (16)
377
+ This is another significant result of the present work.
378
+ We
379
+ have linked the averaged optical chirality associated with scat-
380
+ tered fields, ˜Cσ
381
+ sca, which is usually computed in the near-field,
382
+ with quantities that can be evaluated or measured in far-field,
383
+ i.e.
384
+ the helicity expectation value, ⟨Λ⟩ and the scattering
385
+ cross-section, σsca. In addition, and for helicity-preserving
386
+ objects, ⟨Λ⟩ ∼ 1, the averaged optical chirality associated
387
+ with scattered fields is simply given by the scattering cross-
388
+ section. That is, ˜Cσ
389
+ sca ∼ Ghlhlk2σsca. It is also essential to
390
+ notice that, for both lossless and helicity-preserving objects,
391
+ ˜Cσ
392
+ sca ∼ Ghlhlk2σext, with σext = σsca, σext being the extinction
393
+ cross-section [49]. That is, the CD enhancement captured by
394
+ the fCD factor is related to a single measurement of the ex-
395
+ tincted power in the forward direction whenever ⟨Λ⟩ ∼ 1. The
396
+ relation between fCD and σext for helicity-preserving achiral
397
+ objects greatly reduces eventual experimental and numerical
398
+ calculations devoted to enhanced chiral sensing.
399
+
400
+ 1.0
401
+ 0.9
402
+ X 0.8
403
+ 0.7
404
+ 0.6
405
+ 2.5
406
+ 3.5
407
+ 4.5
408
+ m4.5
409
+ 4.5
410
+ = 3.5
411
+ E 3.5
412
+ 2.5
413
+ 2.5
414
+ 0.5
415
+ 1.0
416
+ 1.5
417
+ 2.0
418
+ u4.5
419
+ 4.5
420
+ = 3.5
421
+ E 3.5
422
+ 2.5
423
+ 2.5
424
+ 0.5
425
+ 1.0
426
+ 1.5
427
+ 2.0
428
+ u4
429
+ TABLE I. Analytic expressions for the CD enhancement factor, fCD, depending on the interaction between an incident plane-wave and an
430
+ achiral scatterer. Here alm and blm denote the electric and magnetic scattering coefficients and {Ghlhl,G jlhl} can be computed from Eq. (B3);
431
+ ⟨Λ⟩ denotes the electromagnetic helicity expectation value and Λθ the helicity density; σsca and σext are the scattering and extinction cross-
432
+ sections; and λ the radiation wavelength.
433
+ Approximation in the calculation of fCD
434
+ Plane wave illumination
435
+ Exact multipolar expansion
436
+ fCD = 1+∑lm (2l +1)
437
+
438
+ Re{almblm∗}Ghlhl +Re{(alm +blm)G jlhl}
439
+
440
+ Scattering approximation
441
+ fCD ∼ 1+∑lm (2l +1)Re{almblm∗}Ghlhl
442
+ Scattering approximation for arbitrary samples
443
+ well-described by a single multipolar order l
444
+ fCD ∼ 1+ πGhlhl
445
+ λ 2
446
+ ⟨Λ⟩σsca −→
447
+ ����
448
+ Lossless
449
+ fCD ∼ 1+ πGhlhl
450
+ λ 2
451
+ ⟨Λ⟩σext
452
+ Scattering approximation for cylindrical samples
453
+ well-described by a single multipolar order l
454
+ fCD ∼ 1+ πGhlhl
455
+ λ 2
456
+ Λθσsca −→
457
+ ����
458
+ Lossless
459
+ fCD ∼ 1+ πGhlhl
460
+ λ 2
461
+ Λθσext
462
+ So far, we have shown an alternative way to infer local CD
463
+ enhancements in the near-field limit by computing far-field
464
+ magnitudes such as the helicity expectation value, the scatter-
465
+ ing cross-section, or the extinction cross-section. In particular,
466
+ a scenario of major interest for the purpose of enhanced chi-
467
+ ral detection occurs when the antenna preserves the helicity
468
+ of the incident illumination, i.e. whenever ⟨Λ⟩ ∼ 1. These
469
+ objects satisfy |Eσσ′
470
+ sca (r)| ∼ 0 for σ ̸= σ′. This phenomenon
471
+ is desirable since the local sign of optical chirality is pre-
472
+ served. Experimentally, identifying helicity-preserving scat-
473
+ terers requires measuring the polarization of all the scattered
474
+ field components, something which is not feasible in practice.
475
+ Thus, our question is: can we infer the helicity expectation
476
+ value, ⟨Λ⟩, from a single measurement in the far-field? In
477
+ the last part of this work, we will discuss scenarios in which
478
+ the helicity density at a given scattering angle can be identical
479
+ to its expected value. In particular, we will focus on cylin-
480
+ drically symmetric scatterers which preserve the total angular
481
+ momentum in the incident direction (m = m′) and whose op-
482
+ tical response can be well-described by a single multipolar
483
+ order (l = l′), e.g., nanodisks at normal incidence or spherical
484
+ particles under the illumination of tightly-focused Laguerre-
485
+ Gaussian beams [50].
486
+ Mathematically, we can express the aforementioned condi-
487
+ tion as ⟨Λ⟩ = Λθ, where Λθ denotes the helicity density at an
488
+ angle θ, where θ is the scattering angle. After some algebra
489
+ (see Appendix D), we obtain:
490
+ Pm
491
+ l (cosθ)∂Pm
492
+ l (cosθ)
493
+ ∂ cosθ
494
+ = 0
495
+ =⇒
496
+ ⟨Λ⟩ = Λθ,
497
+ (17)
498
+ where Pm
499
+ l (cosθ) are the associated Legendre Polynomi-
500
+ als [43]. This is another key result of the present work. The
501
+ helicity expectation value can indeed be computed from a sin-
502
+ gle measurement of the helicity density at a specific angle θ.
503
+ Our result implies that for a cylindrically symmetric scatterer
504
+ whose response can be well-described by a single multipo-
505
+ lar order, l, if we excite it with an illumination with a fixed
506
+ total angular momentum, m, Eq. (17) specifies the angle at
507
+ which the helicity density is equal to its expected value. For
508
+ instance, if we consider the typical case of a cylindrically sym-
509
+ metric dipolar target (l = 1) under a circularly polarized plane-
510
+ wave illumination (m = ±1), Eq. (17) yields that the angle we
511
+ should look at is θ = π/2. That is, the expectation value of
512
+ the electromagnetic helicity can be inferred from a single mea-
513
+ surement at the right angle. Thus, and according to Eq. (16),
514
+ for lossless and cylindrically symmetric targets, we can infer
515
+ the fCD factor by just considering two far-field measurements:
516
+ extinction cross-section, in the forward direction, and helicity
517
+ density, at an angle θ specified by Eq. (17) [51].
518
+ Table I resumes the main results of this work, particularized
519
+ for plane-wave illumination, as it is the most common exter-
520
+ nal excitation for enhanced chiral sensing to date. In short, we
521
+ have derived an exact multipole expansion of the integrated
522
+ CD enhancement factor, fCD, for scatterers of any form and
523
+ shape under general illumination conditions. In addition, we
524
+ have established a roadmap to infer local CD enhancements
525
+ from far-field measurements. That is, fCD can be extracted
526
+ by calculating the helicity expectation value and the scatter-
527
+ ing cross section, two Stokes parameters that can be evaluated
528
+ in the far-field limit. Finally, we have shown an even more
529
+ practical route to deduce fCD for cylindrically symmetric ob-
530
+ jects by means of measuring the extinction cross-section and
531
+ the local density of electromagnetic helicity at specific an-
532
+ gles. Our results pave the way for experimental verification
533
+ and characterization of building blocks for CD enhancement
534
+ from far-field measurements, and thus, may give rise to novel
535
+ developments in the field of chiral light-matter interactions.
536
+
537
+ 5
538
+ [1] J. Watson, The double helix (Hachette UK, 2012).
539
+ [2] W. G. McBride, Lancet 2, 90927 (1961).
540
+ [3] W. Lenz and K. Knapp, Archives of Environmental Health: An
541
+ International Journal 5, 14 (1962).
542
+ [4] M. Calkin, Am. J. Phys 33, 958 (1965).
543
+ [5] N. Yu and F. Capasso, Nature materials 13, 139 (2014).
544
+ [6] D. Wen, S. Chen, F. Yue, K. Chan, M. Chen, M. Ardron, K. F.
545
+ Li, P. W. H. Wong, K. W. Cheah, E. Y. B. Pun, et al., Advanced
546
+ Optical Materials 4, 321 (2016).
547
+ [7] J. M. Abendroth, M. L. Solomon, D. R. Barton III, M. S.
548
+ El Hadri, E. E. Fullerton, and J. A. Dionne, Advanced Opti-
549
+ cal Materials 8, 2001420 (2020).
550
+ [8] C. Zhang, G. Wang, H.-X. Xu, X. Zhang, and H.-P. Li, Ad-
551
+ vanced Optical Materials 8, 1901719 (2020).
552
+ [9] X. Zambrana-Puyalto and N. Bonod, Nanoscale 8, 10441
553
+ (2016).
554
+ [10] A. Garc´ıa-Etxarri and J. A. Dionne, Physical Review B 87,
555
+ 235409 (2013).
556
+ [11] K. M. Czajkowski and T. J. Antosiewicz, Nanophotonics 11,
557
+ 4287 (2022).
558
+ [12] Z. Fan and A. O. Govorov, Nano letters 10, 2580 (2010).
559
+ [13] J. Garc´ıa-Guirado, M. Svedendahl, J. Puigdollers,
560
+ and
561
+ R. Quidant, Nano letters 18, 6279 (2018).
562
+ [14] L. V. Poulikakos, P. Thureja, A. Stollmann, E. De Leo, and
563
+ D. J. Norris, Nano letters 18, 4633 (2018).
564
+ [15] A. Garc´ıa-Etxarri, R. G´omez-Medina, L. S. Froufe-P´erez,
565
+ C. L´opez, L. Chantada, F. Scheffold, J. Aizpurua, M. Nieto-
566
+ Vesperinas, and J. J. S´aenz, Opt. Express 19, 4815 (2011).
567
+ [16] J. Olmos-Trigo, D. R. Abujetas, C. Sanz-Fern´andez, J. A.
568
+ S´anchez-Gil,
569
+ and J. J. S´aenz, Physical Review Research 2,
570
+ 013225 (2020).
571
+ [17] M. L. Tseng, Y. Jahani, A. Leitis, and H. Altug, ACS Photonics
572
+ 8, 47 (2020).
573
+ [18] L. A. Warning, A. R. Miandashti, L. A. McCarthy, Q. Zhang,
574
+ C. F. Landes, and S. Link, ACS nano 15, 15538 (2021).
575
+ [19] J. Hu, M. Lawrence, and J. A. Dionne, ACS Photonics 7, 36
576
+ (2019).
577
+ [20] E.
578
+ Hendry,
579
+ T.
580
+ Carpy,
581
+ J.
582
+ Johnston,
583
+ M.
584
+ Popland,
585
+ R. Mikhaylovskiy, A. Lapthorn, S. Kelly, L. Barron, N. Gade-
586
+ gaard,
587
+ and M. Kadodwala, Nature nanotechnology 5, 783
588
+ (2010).
589
+ [21] C. Kelly, L. Khosravi Khorashad, N. Gadegaard, L. D. Barron,
590
+ A. O. Govorov, A. S. Karimullah,
591
+ and M. Kadodwala, Acs
592
+ Photonics 5, 535 (2018).
593
+ [22] W. Zhang, T. Wu, R. Wang, and X. Zhang, Nanoscale 9, 5701
594
+ (2017).
595
+ [23] K. Yao and Y. Liu, Nanoscale 10, 8779 (2018).
596
+ [24] M. Hanifeh and F. Capolino, Journal of Applied Physics 127,
597
+ 093104 (2020).
598
+ [25] W. A. Paiva-Marques, F. Reyes G´omez, O. N. Oliveira Jr, and
599
+ J. R. Mej´ıa-Salazar, Sensors 20, 944 (2020).
600
+ [26] E. Mohammadi, A. Tittl, K. L. Tsakmakidis, T. Raziman, and
601
+ A. G. Curto, ACS photonics 8, 1754 (2021).
602
+ [27] E. Hendry, R. Mikhaylovskiy, L. Barron, M. Kadodwala, and
603
+ T. Davis, Nano letters 12, 3640 (2012).
604
+ [28] M. L. Solomon, J. Hu, M. Lawrence, A. Garc´ıa-Etxarri, and
605
+ J. A. Dionne, ACS Photonics 6, 43 (2018).
606
+ [29] F. Graf, J. Feis, X. Garcia-Santiago, M. Wegener, C. Rockstuhl,
607
+ and I. Fernandez-Corbaton, ACS Photonics 6, 482 (2019).
608
+ [30] J. Garcia-Guirado, M. Svedendahl, J. Puigdollers,
609
+ and
610
+ R. Quidant, Nano Letters (2019).
611
+ [31] J. Lasa-Alonso, D. R. Abujetas, ´A. Nodar, J. A. Dionne, J. J.
612
+ S´aenz, G. Molina-Terriza, J. Aizpurua, and A. Garc´ıa-Etxarri,
613
+ Acs Photonics 7, 2978 (2020).
614
+ [32] S. Droulias and L. Bougas, Nano Letters 20, 5960 (2020).
615
+ [33] G. Rui, S. Zou, B. Gu, and Y. Cui, The Journal of Physical
616
+ Chemistry C 126, 2199 (2022).
617
+ [34] J. Feis, D. Beutel, J. K¨opfler, X. Garcia-Santiago, C. Rockstuhl,
618
+ M. Wegener, and I. Fernandez-Corbaton, Physical Review Let-
619
+ ters 124, 033201 (2020).
620
+ [35] M. Khanbekyan and S. Scheel, Physical Review A 105, 053711
621
+ (2022).
622
+ [36] J. Olmos-Trigo and X. Zambrana-Puyalto, Phys. Rev. Applied
623
+ 18, 044007 (2022).
624
+ [37] Y. Tang and A. E. Cohen, Physical review letters 104, 163901
625
+ (2010).
626
+ [38] L. V. Poulikakos, J. A. Dionne, and A. Garc´ıa-Etxarri, Symme-
627
+ try 11, 1113 (2019).
628
+ [39] Notice that under the widely used illumination of circularly-
629
+ polarized plane-waves, we get |Cσ
630
+ inc(r)| = kε|E0|2/2, E0 denot-
631
+ ing the amplitude of the electric field [37]. That is, we obtain a
632
+ scalar that does not depend on the spatial coordinates.
633
+ [40] J. Olmos-Trigo, M. Mel´endez, R. Delgado-Buscalioni, and J. J.
634
+ S´aenz, Opt. Express 27, 16384 (2019).
635
+ [41] I. Fernandez-Corbaton, M. Fruhnert, and C. Rockstuhl, Physi-
636
+ cal Review X 6, 031013 (2016).
637
+ [42] For the sake of simplicity and hereinafter, we assume the factor
638
+ (kε)/2 in the definition of the density of optical chirality.
639
+ [43] J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics (John Wiley & Sons,
640
+ New York, 1999).
641
+ [44] We notice that we can directly compute the fCD factor for the
642
+ exact solution of the electromagnetic fields under the illumina-
643
+ tion of a well-defined helicity beam. However, we would lose
644
+ track of the role of the multipoles contributing to the fCD fac-
645
+ tor, Moreover, imaginary integrating spheres surrounding the
646
+ object would be needed at each calculation of the fields in order
647
+ to perform the averaging integral surrounding the object.
648
+ [45] B. Coe, J. Olmos-Trigo, D. Qualls, M. Alexis, M. Szczerba,
649
+ D. R. Abujetas, M. Biswas, and U. Manna, Advanced Optical
650
+ Materials , 2202140 (2022).
651
+ [46] J. Olmos-Trigo, C. Sanz-Fern´andez, D. R. Abujetas, J. Lasa-
652
+ Alonso, N. de Sousa, A. Garc´ıa-Etxarri, J. A. S´anchez-Gil,
653
+ G. Molina-Terriza, and J. J. S´aenz, Physical Review Letters
654
+ 125, 073205 (2020).
655
+ [47] J.
656
+ Olmos-Trigo,
657
+ D.
658
+ R.
659
+ Abujetas,
660
+ C.
661
+ Sanz-Fern´andez,
662
+ X. Zambrana-Puyalto,
663
+ N. de Sousa,
664
+ J. A. S´anchez-Gil,
665
+ and J. J. S´aenz, Physical Review Research 2, 043021 (2020).
666
+ [48] J. Lasa-Alonso, J. Olmos-Trigo, A. Garc´ıa-Etxarri,
667
+ and
668
+ G. Molina-Terriza, Materials Advances (2022).
669
+ [49] C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman, Absorption and scattering of
670
+ light by small particles (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).
671
+ [50] C. Sanz-Fern´andez, M. Molezuelas-Ferreras, J. Lasa-Alonso,
672
+ N. de Sousa, X. Zambrana-Puyalto, and J. Olmos-Trigo, Laser
673
+ & Photonics Reviews , 2100035 (2021).
674
+ [51] In terms of the usual Stokes parameters, extinction is pro-
675
+ portional to the s0 parameter and helicity density is the ratio
676
+ s3/s0 [48].
677
+ [52] I. Fernandez-Corbaton, X. Zambrana-Puyalto, N. Tischler,
678
+ X. Vidal, M. L. Juan, and G. Molina-Terriza, Phys. Rev. Lett.
679
+ 111, 060401 (2013).
680
+ [53] G. N. Watson, A treatise on the theory of Bessel functions (Cam-
681
+ bridge university press, 1995).
682
+
683
+ 6
684
+ [54] B. Carrascal, G. A. Estevez, P. Lee, and V. Lorenzo, European
685
+ Journal of Physics 12, 184 (1991).
686
+
687
+ 7
688
+ Appendix A: Multipolar electromagnetic fields in a well-defined helicity basis
689
+ 1.
690
+ Incident electromagnetic fields
691
+ To start with the calculation of the surface-enhanced circular dichroism (CD), we need first to write down the electromagnetic
692
+ fields. The most generic expression of the incident electromagnetic fields are given by
693
+ Einc(r) =
694
+
695
+
696
+ l=0
697
+ +l
698
+
699
+ m=−l
700
+ ge
701
+ lmNNN j
702
+ lm(r)+gm
703
+ lmM
704
+ M
705
+ M j
706
+ lm(r),
707
+ (A1)
708
+ iZHinc(r) =
709
+
710
+
711
+ l=0
712
+ +l
713
+
714
+ m=−l
715
+ ge
716
+ lmM
717
+ M
718
+ M j
719
+ lm(r)+gm
720
+ lmNNN j
721
+ lm(r),
722
+ (A2)
723
+ where ge
724
+ lm and gm
725
+ lm stands for the incident electric and magnetic beam’s shape coefficients, respectively, and
726
+ M
727
+ M
728
+ M j
729
+ lm(r) = jl(kr)XXXlm(r),
730
+ NNN j
731
+ lm(r) = ∇∇∇×M
732
+ M
733
+ M j
734
+ lm(r)
735
+ k
736
+ ,
737
+ XXXlm(r) = LYlm(θ,ϕ)
738
+
739
+ l(l +1)
740
+ .
741
+ (A3)
742
+ Here M
743
+ M
744
+ M j
745
+ lm(r) and NNN j
746
+ lm(r) are (incident) Hansen’s multipoles [43], jl(kr) are the spherical Bessel functions, k being the radia-
747
+ tion wavelength, and r the observation point. Moreover, Ylm(θ,ϕ) are the spherical harmonics, θ and ϕ being the polar and
748
+ azimuthal angles, and L = {−ir×∇∇∇} is the total angular momentum operator. At this point, let us consider an arbitrary incident
749
+ electromagnetic field with well-defined helicity, σ = ±1. Mathematically, we can write this well-defined helicity field as
750
+
751
+ inc(r) = Einc(r)+σiZHinc(r)
752
+ 2
753
+ =
754
+
755
+
756
+ l=0
757
+ +l
758
+
759
+ m=−l
760
+ �ge
761
+ lm +σgm
762
+ lm
763
+
764
+ 2
765
+ ��
766
+ NNN j
767
+ lm(r)+σM
768
+ M
769
+ M j
770
+ lm(r)
771
+
772
+ 2
773
+
774
+ =
775
+
776
+
777
+ l=0
778
+ +l
779
+
780
+ m=−l
781
+
782
+ lmΨΨΨσ
783
+ lm(r),
784
+ (A4)
785
+ where
786
+
787
+ lm = ge
788
+ lm +σgm
789
+ lm
790
+
791
+ 2
792
+ ,
793
+ and
794
+ ΨΨΨσ
795
+ lm(r) = NNN j
796
+ lm(r)+σM
797
+ M
798
+ M j
799
+ lm(r)
800
+
801
+ 2
802
+ .
803
+ (A5)
804
+ Let us recall that the multipoles ΨΨΨσ
805
+ lm(r) are eigenvectors of the squared angular momentum L2, the projection of the angular
806
+ momentum on one direction, Lz, and helicity ΛΛΛ = (1/k)∇× [52] with eigenvalues l(l +1), m, σ, respectively.
807
+ 2.
808
+ Scattered and total electromagnetic fields
809
+ At this point, let us consider the scattered electromagnetic fields. The most generic expression of these fields is given by
810
+
811
+ sca(r) =
812
+
813
+
814
+ l=0
815
+ +l
816
+
817
+ m=−l
818
+
819
+ lmNNNh
820
+ lm(r)+bσ
821
+ lmM
822
+ M
823
+ Mh
824
+ lm(r),
825
+ (A6)
826
+ iZHσ
827
+ sca(r) =
828
+
829
+
830
+ l=0
831
+ +l
832
+
833
+ m=−l
834
+
835
+ lmM
836
+ M
837
+ Mh
838
+ lm(r)+bσ
839
+ lmNNNh
840
+ lm(r),
841
+ (A7)
842
+ where aσ
843
+ lm and bσ
844
+ lm stand for the electric and magnetic scattering coefficients, respectively. Notice that aσ
845
+ lm and bσ
846
+ lm depend on the
847
+ incident illumination. As a result, we have explicitly indicated the σ-dependency. Moreover,
848
+ M
849
+ M
850
+ Mh
851
+ lm(r) = hl(kr)XXXlm(r),
852
+ NNNh
853
+ lm(r) = ∇∇∇×M
854
+ M
855
+ Mh
856
+ lm(r)
857
+ k
858
+ ,
859
+ (A8)
860
+ where M
861
+ M
862
+ Mh
863
+ lm(r) and NNNh
864
+ lm(r) are (scattered) Hansen’s multipoles [43] and hl(kr) are the spherical Hankel functions. Following the
865
+ steps done in Eq. (A4), the electric field reads as
866
+ Eσσ′
867
+ sca (r) = Eσ
868
+ sca(r)+σ���iZHσ
869
+ sca(r)
870
+ 2
871
+ =
872
+
873
+
874
+ l=0
875
+ +l
876
+
877
+ m=−l
878
+ �aσ
879
+ lm +σ′bσ
880
+ lm
881
+
882
+ 2
883
+ ��
884
+ NNNh
885
+ lm(r)+σ′M
886
+ M
887
+ Mh
888
+ lm(r)
889
+
890
+ 2
891
+
892
+ =
893
+
894
+
895
+ l=0
896
+ +l
897
+
898
+ m=−l
899
+ Dσσ′
900
+ lm ΦΦΦσ′
901
+ lm(r),
902
+ (A9)
903
+ where
904
+ Dσσ′
905
+ lm = aσ
906
+ lm +σ′bσ
907
+ lm
908
+
909
+ 2
910
+ ,
911
+ and
912
+ ΦΦΦσ′
913
+ lm(r) = NNNh
914
+ lm(r)+σ′M
915
+ M
916
+ Mh
917
+ lm(r)
918
+
919
+ 2
920
+ .
921
+ (A10)
922
+
923
+ 8
924
+ At this stage, let us write down the relation between the incident and scattering amplitudes. These are given by Cramer’s rule of
925
+ the tangential Maxwell boundary conditions [43], aσ
926
+ lm = almge
927
+ lm and bσ
928
+ lm = blmgm
929
+ lm where alm and blm are the so-called electric and
930
+ magnetic scattering coefficients, respectively. Notice alm and blm do not depend on the incident illumination but on the optical
931
+ properties and geometry of the target, e.g., the electric and magnetic Mie coefficients. Now, and since we are dealing with a
932
+ well-defined helicity field, we can notice from Eq. (A4) that ge
933
+ lm = σgm
934
+ lm. Accordingly, we can write
935
+
936
+ lm = alm
937
+ �Cσ
938
+ lm
939
+
940
+ 2
941
+
942
+ ,
943
+
944
+ lm = σblm
945
+ �Cσ
946
+ lm
947
+
948
+ 2
949
+
950
+ .
951
+ (A11)
952
+ Now, by inserting Eq. (A11) into the left side of Eq. (A10), we arrive to
953
+ Dσσ′
954
+ lm = Cσ
955
+ lm
956
+ (alm +σσ′blm)
957
+ 2
958
+ .
959
+ (A12)
960
+ From now on, this will be our choice for the representation of the scattered coefficients. To conclude Appendix A, let us write
961
+ the total electromagnetic fields. These are given by the additive sum of the incident and scattered electromagnetic fields. Hence,
962
+ by taking into account both Eq. (A4) and Eq. (A9), we can straightforwardly write,
963
+
964
+ tot(r) = ∑
965
+ σ′=±1
966
+ Eσσ′
967
+ tot (r),
968
+ iZHσ
969
+ tot(r) = ∑
970
+ σ′=±1
971
+ σ′Eσσ′
972
+ tot (r),
973
+ (A13)
974
+ with
975
+ Eσσ′
976
+ tot (r) = Eσσ′
977
+ sca (r)+Eσ
978
+ inc(r)δσσ′,
979
+ (A14)
980
+ where δσσ′ is a Kronecker delta. Next, we will use the orthogonality expressions that satisfy both the incident and scattered
981
+ electromagnetic fields to compute the exact multipolar expansion of the CD enhancement factor.
982
+ Appendix B: An exact multipolar expansion of fCD beyond the plane-wave picture
983
+ 1.
984
+ An exact multipolar expansion of fCD: Orthogonality relations of well-defined helicity multipoles
985
+ To derive an exact multipolar expansion of the CD enhancement factor, fCD, beyond the plane-wave picture, we need to know
986
+ the orthogonality relations that satisfy both incident and scattered electromagnetic fields over an integrating sphere surrounding
987
+ the object under illumination. To that end, we need first to calculate the set of orthogonality relations that fulfill the multipoles
988
+ with well-defined helicity. That is, we need the orthogonality relations between incident {ΨΨΨσ
989
+ lm,ΨΨΨσ
990
+ l′m′}, interference {ΨΨΨσ
991
+ lm,ΦΦΦσ
992
+ l′m′},
993
+ and scattering {ΦΦΦσ
994
+ lm,ΦΦΦσ
995
+ l′m′} terms, according to Eq. (7). Fortunately, all these relations can be derived from Jackson’s third edition
996
+ book. Let us start this section by transcribing Eq. 10.48 that can be found on page 472 of Ref. [43]:
997
+
998
+ Ω N f
999
+ lm
1000
+ ∗ ·Ng
1001
+ l′m′dΩ = δll′δmm′
1002
+
1003
+ f ∗
1004
+ l (u)gl(u)+ 1
1005
+ u2
1006
+
1007
+ ∂u
1008
+
1009
+ uf ∗
1010
+ l (u) ∂
1011
+ ∂u (ugl(u))
1012
+ ��
1013
+ ,
1014
+
1015
+ Ω M f
1016
+ lm
1017
+ ∗ ·Mg
1018
+ l′m′dΩ = f ∗
1019
+ l (u)gl(u)δll′δmm′.
1020
+ (B1)
1021
+ Here u = kr denotes the optical radius of the integrating sphere and {δll′,δmm′} are Kronecker deltas. Notice that { fl(u),gl(u)}
1022
+ denote either Bessel or Hankel spherical functions, namely, jl(u) and hl(u) [43], depending on the nature of the field: incident
1023
+ or scattered, respectively.
1024
+ At this point, we have already learned that multipoles with well-defined helicity {ΨΨΨσ
1025
+ lm,ΦΦΦσ
1026
+ lm} are constructed by a linear
1027
+ combination of the Hansel multipoles (see the right side of Eq. (A5) and Eq. (A10) . As a result, we can write from Eq. (B1)
1028
+
1029
+ Ω(ΨΨΨσ
1030
+ l′m′)∗ ·ΨΨΨσ
1031
+ lm dΩ = G jl jlδll′δmm′,
1032
+
1033
+ Ω(ΦΦΦσ
1034
+ l′m′)∗ ·ΦΦΦσ
1035
+ lm dΩ = Ghlhlδll′δmm′,
1036
+
1037
+ Ω(ΨΨΨσ
1038
+ l′m′)∗ ·ΦΦΦσ
1039
+ lm dΩ = G jlhlδll′δmm′,
1040
+ (B2)
1041
+ with
1042
+ G flgl = 1
1043
+ 2
1044
+
1045
+ 2 f ∗
1046
+ l (u)gl(u)+ 1
1047
+ u2
1048
+
1049
+ ∂u
1050
+
1051
+ uf ∗
1052
+ l (u) ∂
1053
+ ∂u (ugl(u))
1054
+ ��
1055
+ .
1056
+ (B3)
1057
+ Now, we can re-write Eq. (B3) to get rid of second derivatives by making use of fundamental properties of the Ricatti-Bessel
1058
+ functions [53]. In particular, we can write,
1059
+ G jl jl = 1
1060
+ 2
1061
+
1062
+ j2
1063
+ l (u)
1064
+
1065
+ 1+ l(l +1)
1066
+ u2
1067
+
1068
+ + 1
1069
+ u2
1070
+ � ∂
1071
+ ∂u (ujl(u)),
1072
+ �2�
1073
+ Ghlhl = 1
1074
+ 2
1075
+
1076
+ |hl(u)|2
1077
+
1078
+ 1+ l(l +1)
1079
+ u2
1080
+
1081
+ + 1
1082
+ u2
1083
+ ����
1084
+
1085
+ ∂u (uhl(u))
1086
+ ����
1087
+ 2�
1088
+ ,
1089
+ (B4)
1090
+ G jlhl = 1
1091
+ 2
1092
+
1093
+ jl(u)hl(u)
1094
+
1095
+ 1+ l(l +1)
1096
+ u2
1097
+
1098
+ + 1
1099
+ u2
1100
+ � ∂
1101
+ ∂u (ujl(u)) ∂
1102
+ ∂u (uhl(u))
1103
+ ��
1104
+ ,
1105
+ (B5)
1106
+ where ∂
1107
+ ∂u (u fl(u))) = ufl−1(u)−l fl(u) is satisfied for f(u) = { jl(u),hl(u)}.
1108
+
1109
+ 9
1110
+ 2.
1111
+ An exact multipolar expansion of fCD: From the helicity basis to the standard electric and magnetic multipolar expansion
1112
+ At this stage, we have all ingredients to calculate the exact multipolar expansion of fCD. The starting point of this section will
1113
+ be Eq. (7). According to Eq. (7), we need the orthogonality relations that satisfy the Rieman-Silberstein representation of the
1114
+ incident and scattered electromagnetic fields:
1115
+ ˜Cσ
1116
+ inc =
1117
+
1118
+ Ω Cσ
1119
+ inc(r)dΩ =
1120
+
1121
+ Ω σ|Eσ
1122
+ inc(r)|2dΩ,
1123
+ (B6)
1124
+ ˜Cσ
1125
+ sca =
1126
+
1127
+ Ω Cσ
1128
+ sca(r)dΩ =
1129
+
1130
+ Ω |Eσ+
1131
+ sca (r)|2 −|Eσ−
1132
+ sca (r)|2dΩ,
1133
+ (B7)
1134
+
1135
+ int =
1136
+
1137
+
1138
+ ˜Cσ
1139
+ int(r)dΩ = 2σ
1140
+
1141
+ Ω Re{Eσ
1142
+ inc
1143
+ ∗(r)·Eσσ
1144
+ sca (r)}dΩ.
1145
+ (B8)
1146
+ These orthogonality relations can be computed by combining Eq. (A4) and Eq. (A9) with Eq. (B2). In fact and after some
1147
+ algebraic manipulations, it can be shown that
1148
+ ˜Cσ
1149
+ inc = σ ∑
1150
+ lm
1151
+ |Cσ
1152
+ lm|2G jl jl,
1153
+ ˜Cσ
1154
+ sca = ∑
1155
+ lm
1156
+
1157
+ |Dσ+
1158
+ lm |2 −|Dσ−
1159
+ lm |2�
1160
+ Ghlhl,
1161
+ ˜Cσ
1162
+ int = 2σ ∑
1163
+ lm
1164
+ Re{Cσ
1165
+ lm
1166
+ ∗Dσσ
1167
+ lm Gjlhl}.
1168
+ (B9)
1169
+ Now, let us insert Eq. (A12) into Eq. (B9) to obtain a closed-relation of the optical chirality enhancements in terms of the electric
1170
+ and magnetic scattering coefficients. After some algebra, we arrive to
1171
+ fCD = 1+
1172
+ ˜Cσ
1173
+ sca + ˜Cσ
1174
+ int
1175
+ ˜Cσ
1176
+ inc
1177
+ ,
1178
+ (B10)
1179
+ with
1180
+ ˜Cσ
1181
+ inc = σ ∑
1182
+ lm
1183
+ |Cσ
1184
+ lm|2Gjl jl,
1185
+ ˜Cσ
1186
+ sca = σ ∑
1187
+ lm
1188
+ |Cσ
1189
+ lm|2Re{almblm∗}Ghlhl,
1190
+ ˜Cσ
1191
+ int = σ ∑
1192
+ lm
1193
+ |Cσ
1194
+ lm|2Re{(alm +blm)Gjlhl}.
1195
+ (B11)
1196
+ Appendix C: Conversion from our conventions to those in Jackson’s book
1197
+ The multipolar expansion of the scattered electromagnetic fields provided in Jackson’s book reads as [43]
1198
+ EJack
1199
+ sca = Z
1200
+
1201
+
1202
+ l=0
1203
+ +l
1204
+
1205
+ m=−l
1206
+ iaE(l,m)NNNh
1207
+ lm(r)+aM(l,m)M
1208
+ M
1209
+ Mh
1210
+ lm(r),
1211
+ (C1)
1212
+ iZHJack
1213
+ sca = Z
1214
+
1215
+
1216
+ l=0
1217
+ +l
1218
+
1219
+ m=−l
1220
+ iaE(l,m)M
1221
+ M
1222
+ Mh
1223
+ lm(r)+aM(l,m)NNNh
1224
+ lm(r).
1225
+ (C2)
1226
+ Now, by inspecting Eqs. (C1)-(C2), we notice that the conversion from our conventions to those in Jackson’s book are given by
1227
+ alm =
1228
+
1229
+ 2iZ
1230
+ �aE(l,m)
1231
+
1232
+ lm
1233
+
1234
+ ,
1235
+ blm =
1236
+
1237
+ 2σZ
1238
+ �aM(l,m)
1239
+
1240
+ lm
1241
+
1242
+ .
1243
+ (C3)
1244
+ where Z = µ/ε is the medium impedance. Notice that the electric and magnetic coefficients, provided in Jackson’s book, can
1245
+ be computed by conventional far-field projections of the scattered electromagnetic fields (see Eq. (9.123) in Ref. [43]). For
1246
+ completeness, we transcribe these expressions,
1247
+ ZaE(l,m)hl(kr) = −
1248
+ k
1249
+
1250
+ l(l +1)
1251
+
1252
+ Y ∗
1253
+ lm(θ,ϕ)r·EJack
1254
+ sca ,
1255
+ aM(l,m)hl(kr) =
1256
+ k
1257
+
1258
+ l(l +1)
1259
+
1260
+ Y ∗
1261
+ lm(θ,ϕ)r·HJack
1262
+ sca .
1263
+ (C4)
1264
+ Appendix D: Extracting the helicity expectation value from a single measurement of its local density
1265
+ In this Appendix, we derive the condition given in Eq. (17), that relates the local density of helicity at a certain angle, Λθ,φ,
1266
+ with the helicity expectation value, ⟨Λ⟩. For that aim, we should first define the local density of helicity, which we consider to
1267
+ be given in far-field by:
1268
+ Λθ,ϕ ≡ lim
1269
+ kr→∞
1270
+ |Eσ+
1271
+ sca (r,θ,ϕ)|2 −|Eσ−
1272
+ sca (r,θ,ϕ)|2
1273
+ |Eσ+
1274
+ sca (r,θ,ϕ)|2 +|Eσ−
1275
+ sca (r,θ,ϕ)|2 ,
1276
+ (D1)
1277
+
1278
+ 10
1279
+ where Eσσ′
1280
+ sca (r,θ,ϕ) is the scattered field written in terms of electromagnetic modes with well-defined helicity. From Eq. (D1),
1281
+ we notice that we require the asymptotic behavior of Eσσ′
1282
+ sca (r,θ,ϕ) in the far-field limit. For that aim, we need first to calculate
1283
+ how Hansel multipoles behave in the far-field limit. After some algebra, we arrive to
1284
+ lim
1285
+ kr→∞NNNh
1286
+ lm(r) = −eikr
1287
+ kr
1288
+ (−i)l+1
1289
+
1290
+ l(l +1
1291
+ ξξξ lm(θ,ϕ),
1292
+ lim
1293
+ kr→∞M
1294
+ M
1295
+ Mh
1296
+ lm(r) = −eikr
1297
+ kr
1298
+ (−i)l+1
1299
+
1300
+ l(l +1
1301
+ iηηηlm(θ,ϕ),
1302
+ (D2)
1303
+ where ξξξ lm(θ,ϕ) = r∇Ylm(θ,ϕ) and ηηηlm(θ,ϕ) = ˆr × ξξξ lm(θ,ϕ). Now, the far-field expression of the electromagnetic field
1304
+ scattered by an arbitrary sample can be computed [54]:
1305
+ Eσσ′
1306
+ sca (r,θ,ϕ) = −eikr
1307
+ kr ∑
1308
+ lm
1309
+ (−i)l+1
1310
+
1311
+ lm
1312
+
1313
+ 2l(l +1)
1314
+ �alm +σσ′blm
1315
+
1316
+ 2
1317
+ ��ξξξ lm +iσ′ηηηlm
1318
+
1319
+ 2
1320
+
1321
+ .
1322
+ (D3)
1323
+ Substituting the scattered field in Eq. (D3) into the expression of the helicity density given by Eq. (D1), we obtain for fixed l
1324
+ and m values:
1325
+ Λθ = 2σ Re(almblm∗)
1326
+
1327
+ |ξξξ lm|2 +|ηηηlm|2�
1328
+
1329
+
1330
+ |alm|2 +|blm|2�
1331
+ Im
1332
+
1333
+ ξξξ ∗
1334
+ lm ·ηηηlm
1335
+
1336
+ [|alm|2 +|blm|2][|ξξξ lm|2 +|ηηηlm|2]−4Re(almblm∗)Im
1337
+
1338
+ ξξξ ∗
1339
+ lm ·ηηηlm
1340
+ �.
1341
+ (D4)
1342
+ The type of scatterers which may be described by fixed l and m values are cylindrically symmetric particles, illuminated by a
1343
+ beam with a well-defined angular momentum, m, and with a non multipolar response. Due to the cylindrical symmetry of the
1344
+ scatterers, helicity density cannot depend on ϕ variable. This is the reason why we have chosen to write helicity density as Λθ in
1345
+ Eq. (D4). Crucially, it can be checked that whenever Im
1346
+
1347
+ ξξξ ∗
1348
+ lm ·ηηηlm
1349
+
1350
+ = 0, one recovers the expression of the helicity expectation
1351
+ value, i.e.
1352
+ Im
1353
+
1354
+ ξξξ ∗
1355
+ lm ·ηηηlm
1356
+
1357
+ = 0
1358
+ =⇒
1359
+ Λθ = ⟨Λ⟩ = 2σ Re(almblm∗)
1360
+ |alm|2 +|blm|2 .
1361
+ (D5)
1362
+ Importantly, the condition Im
1363
+
1364
+ ξξξ ∗
1365
+ lm ·ηηηlm
1366
+
1367
+ = 0 is purely geometrical, i.e. does not depend on the particular response of the
1368
+ scatterer. This fact makes the expression completely general and applicable to any type of cylindrical sample whose response is
1369
+ well-described by a fixed l. Thus, for this type of scatterers, there are locations in the far-field at which the helicity density is
1370
+ equal to the helicity expectation value.
1371
+ The specific sites at which ⟨Λ⟩ = Λθ are obtained by finding the solutions to the equation Im
1372
+
1373
+ ξξξ ∗
1374
+ lm ·ηηηlm
1375
+
1376
+ = 0. More explicitly,
1377
+ we have that the vector and scalar spherical harmonics are written as:
1378
+ ξξξ lm(θ,ϕ) = ∂Ylm(θ,ϕ)
1379
+ ∂θ
1380
+ ˆuθ +
1381
+ 1
1382
+ sinθ
1383
+ ∂Ylm(θ,ϕ)
1384
+ ∂ϕ
1385
+ ˆuϕ
1386
+ (D6)
1387
+ ηηηlm(θ,ϕ) = ∂Ylm(θ,ϕ)
1388
+ ∂θ
1389
+ ˆuϕ −
1390
+ 1
1391
+ sinθ
1392
+ ∂Ylm(θ,ϕ)
1393
+ ∂ϕ
1394
+ ˆuθ
1395
+ (D7)
1396
+ Ylm(θ,ϕ) =
1397
+
1398
+ 2l +1
1399
+
1400
+ (l −m)!
1401
+ (l +m)!Pm
1402
+ l (cosθ)eimϕ,
1403
+ (D8)
1404
+ where Pm
1405
+ l (cosθ) are the associated Legendre polynomials. With the definitions above it is straightforward to check that
1406
+ Pm
1407
+ l (cosθ)∂Pm
1408
+ l (cosθ)
1409
+ ∂ cosθ
1410
+ = 0
1411
+ =⇒
1412
+ Im
1413
+
1414
+ ξξξ ∗
1415
+ lm ·ηηηlm
1416
+
1417
+ = 0.
1418
+ (D9)
1419
+ In conclusion, for fixed values of l and m, there is an angle θ, given by the transcendental equation above, at which the helicity
1420
+ density, Λθ, is equal to the helicity expectation value, ⟨Λ⟩.
1421
+
A9AzT4oBgHgl3EQfTPz-/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
B9FAT4oBgHgl3EQfsh6e/content/tmp_files/2301.08659v1.pdf.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
B9FAT4oBgHgl3EQfsh6e/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
BNAyT4oBgHgl3EQf4PoQ/content/tmp_files/2301.00781v1.pdf.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
BNAyT4oBgHgl3EQf4PoQ/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
C9FRT4oBgHgl3EQfwjj-/content/tmp_files/2301.13639v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,861 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Title:
2
+ Behavioural predictors of math anxiety
3
+ Authors:
4
+ Name: Chen Mun Yip Kinnard
5
+ Institution: Nanyang Technological University
6
7
+
8
+ Name: Azilawati Jamaludin
9
+ Institution: National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University
10
11
+
12
+ Name: Aik Lim Tan
13
+ Institution: National Institute of Education, Singapore
14
15
+ ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5910-7003
16
+ Corresponding author:
17
+ Name: Aik Lim, TAN
18
+ Institution: National Institute of Education, Singapore (1 Nanyang Walk, Singapore 637616)
19
20
+
21
+ Declarations of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
22
+ Funding
23
+ This research was funded by the Singapore National Research Foundation (NRF) under the Science
24
+ of Learning Initiative (NRF2016-SOL002-003).
25
+
26
+
27
+
28
+
29
+ Behavioural Predictors of Math Anxiety
30
+ Abstract
31
+ Math anxiety (MA) is a highly prevalent problem in education that has consistently shown to lead to
32
+ poorer math performance. This study sought to investigate whether certain behaviours are predictive
33
+ of MA among students. The study involved elementary school students (n=124) who were low-
34
+ progressing in math and is part of an educational intervention program to improve their mathematical
35
+ abilities through a neural-informed math game. Ten classification types of behavioural indicators were
36
+ identified, such as counting out loud. A multiple linear regression was conducted where students’
37
+ anxiety scores were regressed on these behavioural observations, along with their gender, mood, and
38
+ math profile. Three behavioural observations were positively and significantly associated with their
39
+ math anxiety. Implications and limitations of the study are discussed.
40
+ Keywords – Math Anxiety, Low-progress math, Behavioural Predictors
41
+ INTRODUCTION
42
+ Math anxiety (MA) refers to a state of fear and apprehension when one is engaging with math
43
+ (Ashcraft & Krause, 2007). It is a highly prevalent problem in many educational settings and persists
44
+ across many different levels of education (Gunderson et al., 2018; Jain & Dowson, 2009), beginning
45
+ in primary school (Harari et al., 2013) and even up until university education (Røykenes & Larsen,
46
+ 2010). Furthermore, MA has been shown to lead to poorer math performance. For instance, a meta-
47
+ analysis by Zhang et al. (2019) found that MA was robustly and negatively associated with math
48
+ performance. In other words, higher MA tend to lead students to perform more poorly in math.
49
+ Researchers have also found that MA can have an adverse impact on one’s initial learning of
50
+ mathematics and subsequently, a poorer acquisition of math skills and advanced mathematical
51
+ concepts as well (Krinzinger et al., 2009). For instance, MA has been shown to adversely affect basic
52
+ numerical operations such as simple addition and subtraction – operations that serve as the
53
+ foundation for more complex mathematical abstraction (Ashcraft, 2002; Maloney et al., 2010). Indeed,
54
+ Ashcraft and Moore (2009) found that individuals with MA tend to find it more difficult to engage in
55
+ complex mathematical calculations.
56
+ It should also be noted that MA can both be the cause and the result of poorer math performance
57
+ among students (Foley et al., 2017). This means that MA does not only lead to poorer math
58
+ performance, but it can also occur due to having performed poorly in a standardized math test
59
+ (Ashcraft & Krause, 2007). In the long-term, this can result in a feedback loop whereby after having
60
+ performed poorly in a math test, students get MA and start to avoid math lessons (Ashcraft & Moore,
61
+ 2009). Subsequently, they might also develop negative beliefs about their math abilities, which further
62
+ exacerbates their MA and avoidance of math classes (Lent et al., 1991). For example, MA is often
63
+ regarded as one of the primary reasons for the low enrolment in math courses among female
64
+ students (Meece et al., 1982). This avoidance can also extend to mathematics-related professions,
65
+ which further limits one’s career opportunities (Eispino et al., 2017).
66
+ Similarly, a recent meta-analysis by Barroso et al. (2021) found that MA was negatively associated
67
+ with math achievement, and that this negative association was present from childhood through to
68
+ adulthood. It should be noted that poorer math performance also lead to negative outcomes in
69
+ adulthood such as poorer financial planning (McKenna and Nickols, 1988) and lower confidence
70
+ among math educators (Olango and Assefa, 2013).
71
+ Given that MA can lead to poorer math learning and performance both in the short-term and long-
72
+ term, it is important to help students manage or ameliorate their MA. A systematic review by Balt et al.
73
+ (2022) suggests that interventions that help manage one’s MA also serve to improve one’s math
74
+ performance. It is therefore important for the early identification of students with higher levels of MA,
75
+ in order to help them reduce their feelings of anxiety, and subsequently, improve their math
76
+ performance.
77
+
78
+ Presently, the predominant way of identifying MA in students is through self-report measures (Carey
79
+ et al., 2017; Luttenberger et al., 2018). However, this method of identifying MA among students in
80
+ actual educational settings might not be very practical as time and manpower are needed to
81
+ administer and collate the results of these measures (Wu et al., 2012). Furthermore, given that one’s
82
+ level of MA can change over time (Ashcraft & Krause, 2007), there might be a need for regular testing
83
+ to obtain a more accurate measure of the students’ MA. This suggests that there is a need for a more
84
+ cost-effective way of identifying MA among students and across time.
85
+ One way of identifying MA might be through the identification of behaviours that are symptomatic of
86
+ one’s underlying MA. Anxiety can manifest itself in a variety of behaviours such as fidgeting and
87
+ restlessness (Yadav et al., 2017). This suggests that it might be possible to identify MA in students
88
+ through their behaviour when engaging with math-related tasks. This is important as any behaviour
89
+ that is predictive of MA can help educators to easily identify students with high MA and, consequently
90
+ help reduce their MA by either managing their emotions or improving their math performance (Balt et
91
+ al., 2022). Thus, this study sought to investigate whether certain behaviours are predictive of MA
92
+ among students.
93
+ LITERATURE REVIEW
94
+ Math Anxiety
95
+ The concept of MA was first introduced as a topic of study in academic research by Dreger and Alken
96
+ (1957) to describe students’ anxiety toward numbers. Presently, MA commonly refers to a state of
97
+ fear and apprehension when one is engaging with math (Ashcraft & Krause, 2007) and is regarded as
98
+ a primarily emotional response (Mammarella et al., 2015). It should be acknowledged that although
99
+ most studies conceptualize MA as a single factor, some researchers suggest that MA consists of two
100
+ dimensions: cognitive and affective (Wigfield & Meece, 1988). The cognitive dimension broadly refers
101
+ to one’s thoughts and concerns about math performance while the affective dimension includes one’s
102
+ emotions like nervousness regarding math testing (Wigfield & Meece, 1988).
103
+ MA can also be differentiated from test anxiety or general anxiety (Ashcraft & Ridley, 2005) For
104
+ instance, different measures of MA are more highly correlated with one another as compared to test
105
+ and general anxiety (Ashcraft & Ridley, 2005). In other words, MA has been shown to be sufficiently
106
+ different from other forms of test or general anxiety, and can thus be considered to be an independent
107
+ construct (Dowker et al., 2016).
108
+ There are many factors that can affect one’s level of MA and they can be differentiated into three
109
+ main categories: environmental, cognitive and personal factors (Rubinsten & Tannock, 2010).
110
+ Environmental factors include the experiences of math learning in the classroom or at home. For
111
+ instance, Mutodi and Ngirande (2014) found that negative experiences of math learning in both at
112
+ home and in the classroom can lead to MA. Similarly, stressful teaching strategies like time testing
113
+ (Ashcraft & Moore, 2009) and assigning math-related tasks as a form of punishment have been found
114
+ to increase one’s MA (Oberlin, 1982). Conversely, McNaught and Grouws (2007) suggests that
115
+ teachers and parents should focus on creating a more positive environment for students when they
116
+ are learning mathematics. They also suggested that parents should focus on exploring any fear and
117
+ anxieties that the child might have towards learning mathematics, especially during the earlier stages
118
+ of math learning. Furthermore, parents’ own MA can have a negative intergenerational effect on their
119
+ children’s experiences of math learning, leading them to have poorer math learning and higher levels
120
+ of MA (Maloney et al., 2015). The culture in which one is brought up could also influence one’s level
121
+ of MA, whereby students in countries with a greater emphasis on doing well in examinations could
122
+ experience higher levels of MA (Dowker et al., 2016; Tan & Yates, 2011).
123
+ Personal factors include low self-efficacy (Kesici & Erdoğan, 2010; Maloney et al., 2011), low self-
124
+ esteem, previous negative experiences (Mutodi & Ngirande, 2014; Rubinsten & Tannock, 2010) and
125
+ even genetic vulnerabilities (Wang et al., 2014). For instance, Wang et al. (2014) found that one’s
126
+ genetic vulnerability to general anxiety also increases one’s likelihood of developing MA. Cognitive
127
+ factors involve having low intelligence and poor cognitive abilities in mathematics (Rubinsten &
128
+ Tannock, 2010).
129
+ Assessments of Math Anxiety
130
+
131
+ Math anxiety is assessed almost exclusively with self-report questionnaires, across all age groups, in
132
+ both educational and research settings (Carey et al., 2017; Luttenberger et al., 2018). For adults,
133
+ common measures include the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale (MARS; Richardson & Suinn, 1972)
134
+ and the Revised Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale (R-MARS; Baloğlu & Zelhart, 2007). There are
135
+ also questionnaires developed for younger populations such as primary school children, involving
136
+ more pictorial rating scales and greater focus on more concrete math situations. Examples include the
137
+ Scale for Early Mathematics Anxiety (SEMA; Wu et al., 2012), and the Children's Attitude to Math
138
+ Scale (James, 2013).
139
+ As with most self-report measures, the accuracy of these questionnaires are subjected to the
140
+ participants’ truthfulness and the accuracy of their own self-perceptions (Dowker et al., 2016). To
141
+ counteract this problem, some studies utilized physiological measures to determine the individual’s
142
+ level of MA, such as the level of cortisol secretion (Mattarella-Micke et al., 2011). Neurological
143
+ measures such as EEG recordings (Núñez-Peña & Suárez-Pellicioni, 2015) and functional MRI scans
144
+ have also been used to measure and map out MA (Pletzer et al., 2015). However, such measures
145
+ might not be very practical in actual educational settings as time and manpower are needed to
146
+ administer and collate the results of these measures (Pletzer et al., 2015; Wu et al., 2012). Given that
147
+ one’s level of MA can change over time (Ashcraft & Krause, 2007), regular testing might be required
148
+ to obtain a more accurate measure of students’ MA. This suggests that there is a need for a more
149
+ cost-effective and adaptive way of measuring one’s level of MA among students and across time.
150
+ Behavioural Predictor of Math Anxiety
151
+ One possible indicator of MA could be the behaviour of the individual while he or she is engaging with
152
+ math-related tasks. MA can affect the individual and manifest itself at various levels, such as the
153
+ physiological level (Hunt et al., 2017), the psychological or cognitive level (Hunt et al., 2014), and the
154
+ emotional level (Papousek et al., 2012).
155
+ MA can also affect individuals on a behavioural level (Pizzie & Kraemer, 2017). For instance,
156
+ individuals who have higher levels of MA tend to display higher instances of disengagement,
157
+ exemplified by the avoidance of mathematical stimuli such as math classes or math-related work
158
+ (Preis & Biggs, 2001; Pizzie & Kraemer, 2017). Similarly, some researchers assert that MA invokes
159
+ three types of reactions: affective, cognitive, and behavioural responses (Olango, 2016; Ashcraft,
160
+ 2019). Olango (2016) states that these behavioural responses fall on a continuum with approach and
161
+ avoidance behaviours as the continuum extremes. Olango (2016) also describes how the three
162
+ domains can interact with one another in a reinforcing way. This could produce either a negative
163
+ cycle, whereby avoidance behaviour reciprocally interacts feelings of anxiety and worry, or whereby
164
+ one’s approach behaviour reciprocally interacts with thoughts of math achievement and feelings of
165
+ confidence, creating a positive and self-reinforcing cycle.
166
+ Similarly, Pries and Biggs (2001) outlines how the negative cycle of avoidance of mathematical stimuli
167
+ occurs in four phases and how it is self-reinforcing. In the first phase, the individual has a negative
168
+ experience with mathematics or mathematics situations. This leads to the second phase, whereby the
169
+ individual starts to avoid mathematics due to the negative experience previously. For the third phase,
170
+ after avoiding mathematics, the individual has less opportunities to improve their mathematics skills,
171
+ consequently becoming less proficient in and prepared for mathematics (Dowker et al., 2016; Pries &
172
+ Biggs, 2001). In the fourth phase, as a consequence of being less prepared for mathematics, the
173
+ individual has poorer mathematics performance. This creates a negative experience with
174
+ mathematics, leading the individual back to phase one and developing a vicious cycle of mathematics
175
+ avoidance and MA (Pries & Biggs, 2001; Ramirez et al., 2018). Such avoidance behavior is so
176
+ common that Ashcraft and Moore (2009) describe it as “an overriding characteristic of math-anxious
177
+ individuals” (p. 201).
178
+ This suggests that certain behaviours could be a manifestation of one’s MA and consequently be
179
+ used to predict the presence of it. This is consistent with the symptomology of anxiety in clinical
180
+ research, whereby certain behaviours have been shown to be symptomatic of one’s anxiety
181
+ (American Psychiatric Association, 2013; Beck et al., 1988; Spitzer et al., 2006). For instance, the
182
+ Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) – a self-report measure of general anxiety symptomatology – indicates
183
+ that certain behaviours such as being “shaky”, “hands trembling” and “wobbliness in legs” are
184
+ common symptoms of anxiety (Beck et al., 1988). Similarly, the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 scale
185
+
186
+ (GAD-7) by Spitzer et al. (2006) – a common self-report tool to determine the severity of anxiety
187
+ symptoms – includes the behavioural symptom of “being so restless that it is hard to sit still”. The
188
+ clinical literature therefore suggests that the presence of certain behaviours is predictive of one’s
189
+ anxiety, signifying that certain behaviours might also be predictive of one’s MA.
190
+ METHOD
191
+ Participants
192
+ A total of 124 Singapore primary school students – aged 6 to 7 years old – were recruited from
193
+ primary schools in Singapore for this study. Of the 124 students, 48.39% were females (n = 60) and
194
+ 51.61% were males (n = 64). The students had different math profiles; they were labelled as either
195
+ Typically Developing (TD; 15.32%; n = 19), Low-Progress Learners (LP; 41.13%; n = 51), or at-risk of
196
+ Developmental Dyscalculia (DD; 43.55%; n = 54). The students were categorised into the three
197
+ groups based on a national numeracy screening assessment administered by the schools when
198
+ students first enter primary school. The students were grouped according to four levels based on their
199
+ scores, ranging from 0 to 3. Students with scores 2 or below are considered low-progressing and will
200
+ need to attend a math pull-out program aimed at providing more support for these students. Students
201
+ who score a ‘3’ are considered Typically Developing. In this particular study, the students also
202
+ completed the Dyscalculia Screener (Butterworth, 2003), which identified students who may be at-risk
203
+ of developmental dyscalculia.
204
+ The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was
205
+ approved by the NTU Institutional Review Board (Reference Number: IRB-2017-10-030).
206
+ Measures
207
+ Math Anxiety
208
+ To measure the students’ math anxiety, the Scale for Early Mathematics Anxiety (SEMA) by Wu et al.
209
+ (2012) was used. The SEMA scale is a 20-item self-report measure that requires participants to
210
+ indicate how anxious they would feel in certain situations involving mathematics. It utilizes a 5-point
211
+ Likert scale, ranging from 1 (not nervous at all) to 5 (very, very nervous). Each of the 5 points on this
212
+ Likert scale are accompanied by a drawing of an anxious face – each with different gradations of
213
+ anxiety based on the number (or the intensity of the anxiety) they represent. The accompaniment of
214
+ the anxious faces helps the children to better identify and choose the number that best represent their
215
+ levels of anxiety (Wu et al., 2012).
216
+ The measure can be differentiated into its two factors: 1) Numerical Processing Anxiety (NPA) factor
217
+ and 2) Situational and Performance Anxiety (SPA) factor. The NPA items require respondents to
218
+ indicate how anxious they would feel if they had to solve certain math questions (e.g., “Is this right? 9
219
+ + 7 = 18”), while the SPA factor focuses on situations where mathematics is involved (e.g., “You are
220
+ in math class and your teacher is about to teach something new”). Each factor consists of 10 items.
221
+ The total SEMA score is calculated by summing all 20 item scores while the total score of its factors
222
+ (e.g., NPA and SPA) is calculated by summing the scores of their corresponding 10 items. Higher
223
+ scores represent higher levels of MA.
224
+ Math Game – ‘Number Beads’
225
+ Number Beads is a digital game that was developed by Butterworth & Laurillard (2017), that sought to
226
+ incorporate and apply the findings from neuroscience and cognitive science research to help low
227
+ attaining learners (e.g., individuals with dyscalculia) in learning mathematics.
228
+ In the game, there is a target set of beads at the top of the screen (grouped with the word ‘Target’;
229
+ refer to Figure 1), with the main objective of the game being to construct the target set by either
230
+ splitting or joining the different colour-coded beads available in the play area. More detailed
231
+ information about the game ‘Number Beads’ can be found in Laurillard (2016).
232
+
233
+
234
+ Figure 1. A screenshot of the Number Beads math game from Laurillard (2016).
235
+ Behavioural Observations
236
+ Given limited research on behaviours predictive of MA, this study took a thematic analysis approach
237
+ towards the formulation of the different categories of behaviours that would be investigated. More
238
+ specifically, the researchers observing the students were instructed to write down any notable
239
+ behaviours that the students exhibited while engaging in the math game.
240
+ Based on these notable behaviours, they were then clustered and categorised into 10 different
241
+ behavioural observations (BO; e.g., BO1 to BO10):
242
+ 1. Counting out loud (BO1)
243
+ This involves counting by saying the numbers out loud one by one (e.g., “three, four, five…”).
244
+ 2. Verbalization of thought process (BO2)
245
+ This refers to the students’ verbalization of their thought process as to how they would carry out the
246
+ arithmetical calculations (e.g., “I can get 6 by taking 2 from 8”).
247
+ 3. Utterance of other comments or sounds (BO3)
248
+ Any other verbal utterances that do not fall into the above two behavioural observations would be
249
+ included in this behavioural observation. Examples include humming, singing of songs, making
250
+ nonsensical sounds or utterances that bear no meaning or relation to the arithmetical tasks at hand.
251
+ 4. Use of fingers to assist in counting (BO4)
252
+ This includes using fingers to point to the ‘beads’ on the computer screen while counting and/or using
253
+ one’s fingers as representations of digits to assist in arithmetic calculations.
254
+ 5. Checking on and interacting with peers (BO5)
255
+ This behavioural observation broadly refers to any of the students’ interactions with their peers.
256
+ Examples include looking at their classmates, asking how they are doing and/or competing with one
257
+ another to achieve the highest scores.
258
+ 6. Gross hand and leg movements (BO6)
259
+ This involves any gross hand and leg movements such as fidgeting, shaking of one’s legs or playing
260
+ with stationery.
261
+ 7. Asking questions when in doubt (BO7)
262
+
263
+ Menu
264
+ Bank
265
+ Target:Any act of clarification regarding how to play the math game or asking for assistance to complete a
266
+ particular set by the students would be included in this behavioural category.
267
+ 8. Celebrating success (BO8)
268
+ This involves any behaviour that signifies a celebration of having successfully completed a level or a
269
+ task. Examples of this behavioural observation include punching the air and saying “Yes! I did it!” or
270
+ raising both hands in the air and cheering.
271
+ 9. Looking elsewhere or being distracted (BO9)
272
+ This refers to any behaviour that is suggestive of a lack of attention or being distracted such as
273
+ looking elsewhere. If the student is looking at their peers, it will not fall under this behavioural
274
+ observation and will instead fall under the behavioural observation of ‘Checking on and interacting
275
+ with peers’.
276
+ 10. Random splitting and joining of Number Beads (BO10)
277
+ This refers to the beads in the math game that participants manipulate (e.g., separating a group of 3
278
+ beads from a larger group of 8 beads to do the calculation for ‘8-3=5’). Even though this is not strictly
279
+ a physical behaviour, there is a strong parallel between this behaviour and the actual manipulation of
280
+ physical objects or what is termed as ‘manipulatives’ to do arithmetic (Jones & Tiller, 2017).
281
+ Mood & Math Profile
282
+ Based on the observations by the research team, each student’s mood while engaging in the math
283
+ game was labelled as one of four moods: 1) happy, 2) neutral, 3) bored or 4) stressed.
284
+ The math profile of the students – as either TD, LP or DD – was determined by both school’s criteria
285
+ (using the Ministry of Education’s Early Numeracy Indicator) and the Dyscalculia Screener
286
+ (Butterworth, 2003).
287
+ Procedure
288
+ The students were first instructed to complete the SEMA measure. Aligned with Wu et al. (2012), a
289
+ trained researcher assisted the students in the completion of this measure by helping to read the
290
+ questions aloud and asking the students to point to the face that best represented how anxious they
291
+ felt. The students were also encouraged to ask questions and clarify the meaning of the questions if
292
+ they did not understand the scale’s items.
293
+ Students were subsequently invited to play the neural-informed math game – Number Beads – on a
294
+ designated laptop. During the game, the researchers took note of the students’ mood and any notable
295
+ behaviours that they exhibited.
296
+ The administration of SEMA and game play took place in school on separate sessions where the
297
+ game was played for about 2-4 hours per student.
298
+ Data Analysis
299
+ Firstly, descriptive analyses of the following variables were conducted: 1) mood; and 2) SEMA scores.
300
+ Secondly, the Chi-square test was employed to investigate whether gender, affect and the
301
+ behavioural observations were significantly related to the students’ math profiles.
302
+ Thirdly, multiple linear regression analyses were conducted where the SEMA scores were regressed
303
+ on the 1) behavioural observations, and the students’ 2) gender, 3) mood and 4) math profile. Given
304
+ that there is no research on such behavioural indicators of math anxiety among Singapore learners, a
305
+ stepwise regression was chosen as it would allow for the selection of a model that provides the most
306
+
307
+ efficient prediction of MA (Aiken & West, 1991). For the stepwise regression analysis, the PIN will be
308
+ set at .05 and POUT will be set at .10.
309
+ As SEMA scale can be broken down into two factors: NPA & SPA factors. Thus, the stepwise
310
+ regression analyses were conducted thrice; each with a different dependent variable (DV). For the
311
+ first model, the DV is the total SEMA score. The second model’s DV is the total NPA score, while the
312
+ third model’s DV is the total SPA score.
313
+ RESULTS
314
+ Descriptive Analyses
315
+ Mood
316
+ Based on the researchers’ observations, 51.61% of the students were happy (n = 64), 39.52% were
317
+ of neutral mood (n = 49), 8.06% were bored (n = 10) and 0.81% was stressed (n = 1).
318
+ SEMA scores
319
+ With regards to the total SEMA score, the mean score across all participants was 23.5 (possible
320
+ range of 0 – 80), with a standard deviation (SD) of 15.91. For each item, the average score was 1.18
321
+ (out of 4), with an SD of 0.80.
322
+ The SEMA scores can be differentiated into their two factors: the NPA factor and the SPA factor. For
323
+ the NPA factor, the mean score across all participants was 13.24 (possible range of 0 – 40), with a
324
+ SD of 8.60. For each item within the NPA factor, the average score was 1.32 (out of 4), with an SD of
325
+ 0.86.For the SPA factor, the mean score across all participants was 10.26 (possible range of 0 – 40),
326
+ with a SD of 8.76. For each item within the SPA factor, the average score was 1.03 (out of 4), with an
327
+ SD of 0.88.
328
+ Math Profile and Gender, Affect & Behavioral Observations
329
+ The chi-square tests revealed that affect, (X2 (2, N = 124) = 5.696, p = .458), and gender were not
330
+ significantly related to math profile (X2 (2, N = 124) = 0.611, p = .737).
331
+ Math profile was only significantly related to one of the behavioral observations, namely BO5 -
332
+ Checking on and interacting with peers (X2 (2, N = 124) = 8.540, p = .014). More specifically, those
333
+ with development dyscalculia were more likely to exhibit the behavior of ‘checking on and interacting
334
+ with peers’ when engaging with math, as compared to those who were ‘low-progress learners’ and
335
+ ‘typically developing’. It was a small to medium effect size (V = .262; Cohen, 1988).
336
+ First regression model: Total SEMA score
337
+ The first regression model regressed the students’ 1) affect, 2) gender, 3) math profile and 4)
338
+ behavioural observations on the total SEMA scores, using a stepwise approach.
339
+ The first predictor added into the regression model was BO1 – Counting out loud. It had the largest
340
+ coefficient of determination (R2 = .061, F(1, 122) = 7.863, p < 0.01). After BO1 was present in the
341
+ model, BO10 – Random splitting and joining of Number Beads – had the next biggest change in the
342
+ coefficient of determination (R2 = .050, F(1, 121) = 6.825, p < 0.05), and was thus added into the
343
+ model.
344
+ The concluding model revealed BO1 and BO10 to be significant factors in affecting total SEMA scores
345
+ (refer to Table 1). This set of predictors explained 11.1% of the variance in total SEMA scores (R2 =
346
+ .111, F(2, 121) = 7.531, p < 0.001).
347
+ Table 1. Summary of the Multiple Regression Analysis for the First Model on Total SEMA scores.
348
+
349
+
350
+ Unstandardised
351
+ Coefficients
352
+
353
+ Standardised
354
+ Coefficients
355
+
356
+
357
+
358
+ Variable
359
+ B
360
+ Std. Error
361
+
362
+ β
363
+
364
+ t
365
+ Sig.
366
+ Constant
367
+ 19.078
368
+ 1.777
369
+
370
+
371
+
372
+ 10.737
373
+ .000
374
+
375
+ BO1 – Counting
376
+ out loud
377
+
378
+ 7.807
379
+
380
+ 2.934
381
+
382
+
383
+ .229
384
+
385
+
386
+ 2.660
387
+
388
+ .009
389
+
390
+ B010 – Random
391
+ splitting and
392
+ joining of Number
393
+ Beads
394
+
395
+ 8.409
396
+
397
+ 3.219
398
+
399
+
400
+ .225
401
+
402
+
403
+ 2.612
404
+
405
+ .010
406
+
407
+ Second regression model: Total NPA score
408
+ Similarly, the second regression model regressed the students’ 1) affect, 2) gender, 3) math profile
409
+ and 4) behavioural observations on the total NPA scores, using a stepwise approach.
410
+ The behavioural observation – BO1 (Counting out loud) – was the only predictor added in this
411
+ regression model (R2 = .047, F(1, 122) = 5.983, p < 0.05). In other words, this model showed that
412
+ BO1 was the only factor that was significantly associated with the total NPA scores (refer to Table 2).
413
+ This model explained 4.7% of the variance in total SEMA scores (R2 = .047, F(1, 122) = 5.983, p <
414
+ 0.05).
415
+ Table 2. Summary of the Multiple Regression Analysis for the Second Model on Total NPA scores.
416
+
417
+ Unstandardised
418
+ Coefficients
419
+
420
+ Standardised
421
+ Coefficients
422
+
423
+
424
+
425
+ Variable
426
+ B
427
+ Std. Error
428
+
429
+ β
430
+
431
+ t
432
+ Sig.
433
+ Constant
434
+ 11.988
435
+ .914
436
+
437
+
438
+
439
+ 13.117
440
+ .000
441
+
442
+ BO1 – Counting out
443
+ loud
444
+
445
+ 3.986
446
+
447
+ 1.630
448
+
449
+
450
+ .216
451
+
452
+
453
+ 2.446
454
+
455
+ .016
456
+
457
+ Third regression model: Total SPA score
458
+ Lastly, the third regression model regressed the same four classes of variables on the total SPA
459
+ scores, using a stepwise approach.
460
+ The first predictor added into the regression model was BO10 – Random splitting and joining of
461
+ Number Beads (R2 = .075, F(1, 122) = 9.906, p < 0.01). BO1 – Counting out loud – was then
462
+ subsequently added into the model (R2 = .046, F(1, 121) = 6.319, p < 0.05). Lastly, the model then
463
+ included BO9 – Looking elsewhere or being distracted (R2 = .033, F(1, 120) = 4.739, p < 0.05).
464
+ The concluding model showed that BO1, BO9 and BO10 were significant factors in affecting total SPA
465
+ scores (refer to Table 3). This set of predictors explained 15.4% of the variance in total SEMA scores
466
+ (R2 = .154, F(1, 120) = 7.304, p < 0.001).
467
+ Table 3. Summary of the Multiple Regression Analysis for the Third Model on Total SPA scores.
468
+
469
+
470
+ Unstandardised
471
+ Coefficients
472
+
473
+ Standardised
474
+ Coefficients
475
+
476
+
477
+
478
+ Variable
479
+ B
480
+ Std. Error
481
+
482
+ β
483
+
484
+ t
485
+ Sig.
486
+ Constant
487
+ 6.818
488
+ 1.049
489
+
490
+
491
+
492
+ 6.501
493
+ .000
494
+
495
+ BO10 – Random
496
+ splitting and joining
497
+ of Number Beads
498
+
499
+ 4.564
500
+
501
+ 1.769
502
+
503
+
504
+ .221
505
+
506
+
507
+ 2.580
508
+
509
+ .011
510
+ B01 – Counting out
511
+ loud
512
+ 4.419
513
+ 1.592
514
+
515
+ .235
516
+
517
+ 2.776
518
+ .006
519
+ BO9 – Looking
520
+ elsewhere or being
521
+ distracted
522
+ 3.694
523
+ 1.697
524
+
525
+ .187
526
+
527
+ 2.177
528
+ .031
529
+
530
+ Discussion
531
+ This study sought to investigate whether affect, gender, math profile and certain behavioural
532
+ observations are predictive of MA. This study concluded with 3 different regression models: 1) total
533
+ SEMA scores, 2) total NPA scores and 3) total SPA scores.
534
+ Is gender related to MA?
535
+ The findings revealed that there was no significant relationship between gender and MA for all three
536
+ regression models. This is consistent with many previous studies which found that there were no
537
+ gender differences in MA for elementary school students (i.e., students aged 5 to 10; Erturan &
538
+ Jansen, 2015; Harari et al., 2013; Kucian et al., 2018; Schleepen & Van Mier, 2016).
539
+ Is affect (mood) related to MA?
540
+ There was no significant association found between affect and MA for all three regression models. In
541
+ other words, the findings suggest that one’s affect is not related to one’s level of MA. This insignificant
542
+ association could be due to the students’ differential abilities in emotional regulation. One form of
543
+ emotional regulation is expressive suppression, which refers to the attempt to conceal one’s feelings
544
+ and physiological state (Cohen et al., 2021). Prior studies found that an individual’s ability to engage
545
+ in emotional regulation is linked to MA (Brooks, 2014; Pizzie & Kraemer, 2021). This suggests that the
546
+ student’s differential abilities in emotional regulation could be a moderating factor in the relationship
547
+ between affect and MA, which might explain the lack of a significant association between these two
548
+ variables.
549
+ Are there differential associations of MA with math learning profiles?
550
+ The results suggest that there is no significant relationship between math profile and MA for all
551
+ regression models. That is, there was no significant differences in the MA scores among students with
552
+ different math profiles. The lack of a significant relationship between math profile and MA in the
553
+ current study could be due to differences in the testing contexts. Unlike previous studies which
554
+ measured the students’ MA in traditional educational contexts (e.g., before and after a standardized
555
+ math test; Zhang et al., 2019), the current study measured the students’ MA in their mathematics
556
+ classrooms and prior to the gameplay.
557
+ Are there behavioural predictors of MA?
558
+
559
+ The findings revealed that three behavioural observations were significantly and positively associated
560
+ with MA: namely, 1) the act of counting out loud, 2) randomly splitting and joining of the Number
561
+ Beads, and 3) looking elsewhere or being distracted.
562
+ BO1 – counting out loud – was consistently included in all three regression models. This suggests
563
+ that the behaviour of counting out loud could be a predictor of a student with MA. This finding seems
564
+ to be consistent with the current literature. Past findings suggest that individuals with MA tend to have
565
+ smaller work memory capacity when engaging in arithmetic tasks as they often have intrusive anxious
566
+ thoughts that take up working memory resources (Ashcraft & Krause, 2007; Maloney et al., 2010; Shi
567
+ & Liu, 2016). It was also found that one’s working memory capacity mediates the relationship between
568
+ MA and visual enumeration (Maloney et al., 2010). Given that saying material out loud has been
569
+ shown to improve one’s memory of it (Forrin & MacLeod, 2018), the act of counting out loud could
570
+ similarly be a compensatory strategy to aid one’s reduced working memory capacity.
571
+ BO10 – random splitting and joining of Number Beads was included in two regression models –
572
+ where the predictors were regressed on SEMA scores and SPA scores. This suggests a positive
573
+ relation between student’s overall MA and his/her situational and performance anxiety. This is
574
+ consistent with current literature on the negative relationship between MA and math performance
575
+ (Zhang et al., 2019). This behavioural observation (BO) of the random management of the digital
576
+ manipulatives suggests that the student may not know how to procedurally solve the arithmetic task,
577
+ suggesting underlying math struggles manifested by poor math performance. Furthermore, MA can
578
+ both be the cause and the result of poorer math performance (Foley et al., 2017). Taken together,
579
+ BO10 could be symptomatic of one’s poorer math performance and or MA. However, given that this
580
+ behavioural observation was not significantly associated with NPA scores, it suggests that this
581
+ behaviour only occurs for individuals who are anxious about being evaluated on their ability to do
582
+ math problems, and not for those who feel anxious in nonevaluative situations.
583
+ BO9 – looking elsewhere or being distracted – was only included in one regression model, where it
584
+ was focused on SPA scores. This suggests that this behaviour is positively related to one’s situational
585
+ and performance anxiety. This is consistent with prior studies on the behavioural responses that are
586
+ commonly associated with math anxiety, such as behavioural disengagement (Pizzie & Kraemer,
587
+ 2017). Similarly, Eysenck et al. (2007) also showed that anxiety decreases one’s focus on the task at
588
+ hand and makes one more vulnerable to distraction. An inability to focus on the task at hand and
589
+ being distracted by other stimuli (e.g., one’s intrusive thoughts) are common characteristics of those
590
+ with high levels of anxiety (Ramirez et al., 2016). The behavioural observation of looking elsewhere or
591
+ being distracted seems to be symptomatic of this tendency towards disengagement and distraction.
592
+ However, since BO9 was not significantly related to SEMA and NPA scores, this suggests that this
593
+ avoidance behaviour only occurs for individuals who feel anxious when they are being evaluated on
594
+ their ability to do math problems, and not for those who feel anxious in nonevaluative situations.
595
+ Theoretical and practical implications
596
+ Given that there has been no study investigating the relationship between behavioural observations
597
+ and MA particularly in the Singapore education context, this study helped to bridge this literature gap.
598
+ The current study therefore provides researchers with preliminary insights into MA through an
599
+ ethnographic lens, affording opportunities for future research to be done in this area. The findings
600
+ provide some practical implications in the context of math education.
601
+ Instead of relying on self-report measures, educators can tap on their behavioural observations of
602
+ classroom manifestations to anticipate quickly and cost-effectively socio-emotional issues related to
603
+ math learning such as that of Math Anxiety. It would also be less onerous for educators to rely on
604
+ such BO instead of having students complete interim self-report measures of MA. Such behavioural
605
+ observations could also be used for educational contexts in which students are learning to count by
606
+ manipulating physical objects (Jones & Tiller, 2017). The findings suggest that the random
607
+ manipulation of physical objects (e.g., beads) could also be used as an indicator of one’s MA. Such
608
+ observations are therefore able to provide teachers with early indicators to identify students with
609
+ possible MA, thereby enabling them to intervene early and provide the necessary support for these
610
+ students.
611
+ Limitations and Future research
612
+
613
+ This study has two main limitations. Firstly, this study was conducted in the context of a math game.
614
+ More specifically, the students that were being observed in the present study were playing a math
615
+ game. Such educational games tend to be less anxiety-inducing than traditional educational settings
616
+ due to the lower stakes and expectations (Marshall et al., 2016; Rocha & Dondio, 2021; Taylor &
617
+ Mohr, 2001). Thus, the behaviours that were predictive of MA in the current study’s context might not
618
+ be generalizable to traditional educational settings. More research will be needed to ascertain the
619
+ utility of such behavioural predictors in real-world educational settings.
620
+ Secondly, this study was conducted in Singapore, an East Asian country with a high level of math
621
+ proficiency among its students (Programme for International Student Assessment, 2018). Many
622
+ studies have shown that emotional suppression – which refers to the concealment of one’s true
623
+ emotions (Schouten et al., 2020) – is more common in Asian countries like Singapore and Japan as
624
+ compared to Western countries like Belgium and the United States (Butler et al., 2007; Cheung &
625
+ Park, 2010; Soto et al., 2011). This suggests that students from different countries may have differing
626
+ levels of emotional suppression or regulatory abilities when engaging in math-related activities and
627
+ consequently differing expressions of MA.
628
+ CONCLUSION
629
+ This study sought to investigate the relationship between behavioural observations and MA. The
630
+ findings suggest that behavioural observations like counting out loud, randomly splitting and joining
631
+ Number Beads (or any physical objects) and looking elsewhere or being distracted can be predictive
632
+ of one’s MA. It suggests that educators can use such behavioural observations as a quick gauge of
633
+ whether a student is at risk of related socio-emotional struggles such as experiencing anxiety when
634
+ learning math. While current findings might be limited in their generalisability to traditional educational
635
+ settings and western countries, future studies should look to investigating the variables in other
636
+ contexts.
637
+
638
+
639
+
640
+
641
+
642
+ REFERENCES
643
+ Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage
644
+ Publications.
645
+ American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th
646
+ ed.). https://doi-org.ezproxy.frederick.edu/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
647
+ Ashcraft, M. H., & Krause, J. A. (2007). Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety.
648
+ Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 243-248. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194059
649
+ Ashcraft, M. H., & Moore, A. M. (2009). Mathematics anxiety and affective drop in performance.
650
+ Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27(3), 197-205.
651
+ Ashcraft, M. H., & Ridley, K. S. (2005). Math anxiety and its cognitive consequences: A tutorial
652
+ review. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.). The Handbook of Mathematical Cognition (pp. 315-327).
653
+ Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current
654
+ Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 181-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00196
655
+ Ashcraft, M. H. (2019). Models of math anxiety. In I. C. Mammarella, S. Caviola, & A. Dowker (Eds.),
656
+ Mathematics anxiety: What is known and what is still to be understood (pp. 1–19).
657
+ Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199981-1
658
+ Baloğlu, M., & Zelhart, P. F. (2007). Psychometric properties of the revised mathematics anxiety
659
+ rating scale. The Psychological Record, 57(4), 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395597
660
+ Balt, M., Börnert-Ringleb, M., & Orbach, L. (2022). Reducing math anxiety in school children: A
661
+ systematic review of intervention research. Frontiers in Education, 7, 798516.
662
+ https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.798516
663
+ Barroso, C., Ganley, C. M., McGraw, A. L., Geer, E. A., Hart, S. A., & Daucourt, M. C. (2021). A meta-
664
+ analysis of the relation between math anxiety and math achievement. Psychological Bulletin,
665
+ 147(2), 134–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000307
666
+ Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety:
667
+ Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(6), 893–897.
668
+ https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.56.6.893
669
+ Brooks, A. W. (2014). Get excited: Reappraising pre-performance anxiety as excitement. Journal of
670
+ Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1144-1158. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035325
671
+ Butler, E. A., Lee, T. L., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Emotion regulation and culture: Are the social
672
+ consequences of emotion suppression culture-specific? Emotion, 7, 30-48.
673
+ https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.30
674
+ Butterworth, B., & Laurillard, D. (2017). Investigating dyscalculia: A science of learning perspective. In
675
+ J. C. Horvath, J. M. Lodge, & J. Hattie (Eds.), From the laboratory to the classroom:
676
+ Translating science of learning for teachers (pp. 172–190). Routledge/Taylor & Francis
677
+ Group.
678
+ Butterworth, B. (2003). Dyscalculia Screener. London: Nelson Publishing Company Ltd.
679
+ Carey, E., Hill, F., Devine, A., & Szűcs, D. (2017). The modified abbreviated math anxiety scale: A
680
+ valid and reliable instrument for use with children. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(11), 1-13.
681
+ https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00011
682
+
683
+ Cheung, R. Y. M., & Park, I. J. K. (2010). Anger suppression, interdependent self-construal, and
684
+ depression among Asian American and European American college students. Cultural
685
+ Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16, 517-525. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020655
686
+ Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum
687
+ Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
688
+ Cohen, L. D., Korem, N., & Rubinsten, O. (2021). Math anxiety is related to math difficulties and
689
+ composed of emotion regulation and anxiety predisposition: A network analysis study. Brain
690
+ Sciences, 11(12), 1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11121609
691
+ Dowker, A., Sarkar, A., & Looi, C. Y. (2016). Mathematics anxiety: What have we learned in 60
692
+ years? Frontiers In Psychology, 7, 508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00508
693
+ Dreger, R. M., & Aiken, L. R. Jr. (1957). The identification of number anxiety in a college population.
694
+ Journal of Educational Psychology, 48(6), 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045894
695
+ Eispino, M., Pereda, J., Recon, J., Perculeza, E., & Umali, C. (2017). Mathematics anxiety and its
696
+ impact on the course and career choice of grade 11 students. International Journal of
697
+ Education, Psychology and Counselling, 2(5), 99-119.
698
+ Erturan, S., & Jansen, B. (2015). An investigation of boys' and girls' emotional experience of math,
699
+ their math performance, and the relation between these variables. European Journal of
700
+ Psychology of Education, 30, 421-435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0248-7
701
+ Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive
702
+ performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7, 336-353. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-
703
+ 3542.7.2.336
704
+ Foley, A. E., Herts, J. B., Borgonovi, F., Guerriero, S., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2017). The math
705
+ anxiety-performance link. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(1), 52–58.
706
+ https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416672463
707
+ Forrin, N. D., & MacLeod, C. M. (2018). This time it’s personal: The memory benefit of hearing
708
+ oneself. Memory, 26(4), 574-579. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2017.1383434
709
+ Ganley, C. M., & McGraw, A. L. (2016). The development and validation of a revised version of the
710
+ math anxiety scale for young children. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1181.
711
+ https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01181
712
+ Gunderson, E. A., Park, D., Maloney, E. A., Beilock, S. L., & Levine, S. C. (2018). Reciprocal relations
713
+ among motivational frameworks, math anxiety, and math achievement in early elementary
714
+ school. Journal of Cognition and Development, 19, 21–46.
715
+ https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2017.1421538
716
+ Harari, R. R., Vukovic, R. K., & Bailey, S. P. (2013). Mathematics anxiety in young children: An
717
+ exploratory study. Journal of Experimental Education, 81(4), 538-555.
718
+ https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.727888
719
+ Hunt, T., Clark-Carter, D., & Sheffield, D. (2014). Exploring the relationship between mathematics
720
+ anxiety and performance: The role of intrusive thoughts. Journal of Education, Psychology
721
+ and Social Sciences, 2, 69–75.
722
+ Hunt, T. E., Bhardwa, J., & Sheffield, D. (2017). Mental arithmetic performance, physiological
723
+ reactivity and mathematics anxiety amongst UK primary school children. Learning and
724
+ Individual Differences, 57, 129–132.
725
+ Jain, S., & Dowson, M. (2009). Mathematics anxiety as a function of multidimensional self-regulation
726
+ and self-efficacy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 240–249.
727
+ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.05.004
728
+
729
+ James, M. M. (2013). The development and validation of the children's anxiety in math scale. Journal
730
+ of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 391-395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282912470131
731
+ Jones, J. P., & Tiller, M. (2017). Using concrete manipulatives in mathematical instruction.
732
+ Dimensions of Early Childhood, 45(1), 18-23.
733
+ Kesici, S., & Erdogan, A. (2010). Mathematics anxiety according to middle school students’
734
+ achievement motivation and social comparison. Education, 131(1), 54-63.
735
+ Krinzinger, H., Kaufmann, L., & Willmes, L. (2009). Math anxiety and math ability in early primary
736
+ school years. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27(3), 206-224.
737
+ https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282908330583
738
+ Kucian, K., Zuber, I., Kohn, J., Poltz, N., Wyschkon, A., Esser, G., & von Aster, M. (2018). Relation
739
+ between mathematical performance, math anxiety, and affective priming in children with and
740
+ without developmental dyscalculia. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 263.
741
+ https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00263
742
+ Laurillard, D. (2016). Learning number sense through digital games with intrinsic feedback.
743
+ Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(6), 32-44.
744
+ https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3116
745
+ Lent, R. W., Lopez, F. G., & Bieschke, K. J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to
746
+ science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(4), 424-430.
747
+ https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.38.4.424
748
+ Luttenberger, S., Wimmer, S., & Paechter, M. (2018). Spotlight on math anxiety. Psychology
749
+ Research and Behavior Management, 11, 311-322. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S141421
750
+ Maloney, E. A., Ansari, D., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2011). Rapid communication. The effect of
751
+ mathematics anxiety on the processing of numerical magnitude. The Quarterly Journal of
752
+ Experimental Psychology, 64(1), 10-16.
753
+ Maloney, E. A., Ramirez. G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2015).
754
+ Intergenerational effects of parents’ math anxiety on children’s math achievement and
755
+ anxiety. Psychological Sciences, 26(9),1480-1488.
756
+ https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615592630
757
+ Maloney, E. A., Risko, E. F., Ansari, D., & Fugelsang, J. (2010). Mathematics anxiety affects counting
758
+ but not subitizing during visual enumeration. Cognition, 114(2), 293-297.
759
+ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.013
760
+ Mammarella, I. C., Hill, F., Devine, A., Caviola, S., & Szucs, D. (2015). Math anxiety and
761
+ developmental dyscalculia: A study on working memory processes. Journal of Clinical and
762
+ Experimental Neuropsychology, 37(8), 878–887.
763
+ Marshall, E., Mann, V., & Wilson, D. (2016). Teaching strategies for helping students overcome maths
764
+ anxiety. HEA STEM conference, Nottingham.
765
+ Mattarella-Micke, A., Mateo, J., Kozak, M. N., Foster, K., & Beilock, S. (2011). Choke or thrive? The
766
+ relation between salivary cortisol and math performance depends on individual differences in
767
+ working memory and math-anxiety. Emotion, 11, 1000–1005.
768
+ https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023224
769
+ McKenna, J. S., & Nickols, S. Y. (1988). Planning for retirement security: What helps or hinders
770
+ women in the middle years? Home Economics Research Journal, 17, 153-164.
771
+ McNaught, M., & Grouws, D. (2007). Learning goals and effective mathematics teaching: What can
772
+ we learn from research? Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, 10, 2-11.
773
+
774
+ Meece, J., Parsons, J., Kaczala, C., Goff, S., & Futterman, R. (1982). Sex differences in math
775
+ achievement: Toward a model of academic choice. Psychological Bulletin, 91(2), 324-348.
776
+ https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.91.2.324
777
+ Mutodi, P., & Ngirande, H. (2014). Exploring mathematics anxiety: Mathematics students’
778
+ experiences. Mediterranean. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 283-294.
779
+ https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n1p283
780
+ Núñez-Peña, M. I., & Suárez-Pellicioni, M. (2015). Processing of multi-digit additions in high math-
781
+ anxious individuals: Psychophysiological evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1268.
782
+ https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01268
783
+ Oberlin, L. (1982). How to teach children to hate mathematics. School Science and Mathematics,
784
+ 82(3), 261–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1982.tb17187.x
785
+ Olango, M., & Assefa, A. (2013). Determining variances of teacher performance explained by gender
786
+ and teacher self-efficacy variables. The Ethiopian Journal of Education, 33(2), 95-122.
787
+ Olango, M. (2016). Mathematics anxiety factors as predictors of mathematics self-efficacy and
788
+ achievement among freshmen science and engineering students. African Educational
789
+ Research Journal, 4(3), 109–123.
790
+ Papousek, I., Ruggeri, K., Macher, D., Paechter, M., Heene, M., Weiss, E. M., Schulter, G., &
791
+ Freudenthaler, H. H. (2012). Psychometric evaluation and experimental validation of the
792
+ Statistics Anxiety Rating Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(1), 82-91.
793
+ https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.627959
794
+ Pizzie, R. G., & Kraemer, D. J. (2017). Avoiding math on a rapid timescale: Emotional responsivity
795
+ and anxious attention in math anxiety. Brain and Cognition, 118, 100–107.
796
+ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2017.08.004
797
+ Pizzie, R. G., & Kraemer, D. J. (2021). The association between emotion regulation, physiological
798
+ arousal, and performance in math anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 639448.
799
+ https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.639448
800
+ Pletzer, B., Kronbichler, M., Nuerk, H.-C., & Kerschbaum, H. H. (2015). Mathematics anxiety reduces
801
+ default mode network deactivation in response to numerical tasks. Frontiers in Human
802
+ Neuroscience, 9, 202. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00202
803
+ Preis, C., & Biggs, B. T. (2001). Can instructors help learners overcome mathematics anxiety? ATEA
804
+ Journal, 28(4), 6-10.
805
+ Programme for International Student Assessment. (2018). Singapore: Student performance.
806
+ https://gpseducation.oecd.org/CountryProfile?primaryCountry=SGP&treshold=10&topic=PI#:~
807
+ :text=In%20reading%20literacy%2C%20the%20main,30%20points%20higher%20for%20girls
808
+ ).
809
+ Ramirez, G., Chang, H., Maloney, E. A., Susan, C., Levine, S. C., Sian L., & Beilock, S. L. (2016). On
810
+ the relationship between math anxiety and math achievement in early elementary school: The
811
+ role of problem solving strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 83-100.
812
+ Ramirez, G., Shaw, S. T., & Maloney, E. A. (2018). Math anxiety: Past research, promising
813
+ interventions, and a new interpretation framework. Educational Psychology, 53(3), 145–164.
814
+ https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1447384
815
+ Richardson, F. C., & Suinn, R. M. (1972). The mathematics anxiety rating scale. Journal of
816
+ Counseling Psychology, 19(6), 551–554. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033456
817
+
818
+ Rocha, M., & Dondio, P. (2021). Effects of a videogame in math performance and anxiety in primary
819
+ school. International Journal of Serious Games, 8(3), 45-70.
820
+ https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v8i3.434
821
+ Rubinsten, O., & Tannock, R. (2010). Mathematics anxiety in children with developmental dyscalculia.
822
+ Behavioural and Brain Functions, 6(1), 46-58.
823
+ Røykenes, K., & Larsen, T. (2010). The relationship between nursing students’ mathematics ability
824
+ and their performance in a drug calculation test. Nurse Education Today, 30(7), 697-701.
825
+ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.01.009
826
+ Schleepen, T. M., & Van Mier, H. I. (2016). Math anxiety differentially affects boys' and girls'
827
+ arithmetic, reading and fluid intelligence skills in fifth graders. Psychology, 7, 1911-1920.
828
+ https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2016.714174
829
+ Schouten, A., Boiger, M., Hirchner-Häusler, A., Uchida, Y., & Mesquita, B. (2020). Cultural differences
830
+ in emotion suppression in Belgian and Japanese couples: A social functional model. Frontiers
831
+ in Psychology, 11, 1048. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01048
832
+ Shi, Z., & Liu, P. (2016). Worrying thoughts limit working memory capacity in math anxiety. PLoS
833
+ ONE, 11(10), e0165644. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165644.s005
834
+ Soto, J. A., Perez, C. R., Kim, Y.-H., Lee, E. A., & Minnick, M. R. (2011). Is expressive suppression
835
+ always associated with poorer psychological functioning? A cross-cultural comparison
836
+ between European Americans and Hong Kong Chinese. Emotion, 11, 1450-1455.
837
+ https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023340
838
+ Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing
839
+ generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. JAMA Internal Medicine, 166(10), 1092-1097.
840
+ https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
841
+ Tan, J. B., & Yates, S. (2011). Academic expectations as a source of stress in Asian students. Social
842
+ Psychology of Education, 14, 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-010-9146-7
843
+ Taylor, J. A., & Mohr, J. (2001). Mathematics for math anxious students studying at a distance.
844
+ Journal of Education and Development, 25, 30–38.
845
+ Wang, Z., Hart, S. A., Kovas, Y., Lukovski, S., Soden, B., Thompson, L. A., Plomin, R., McLoughlin,
846
+ G., Bartlett, C. W., Lyons, I. M., & Petrill, S. A. (2014). Who is afraid of math? Two sources of
847
+ genetic variance for mathematical anxiety. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(9),
848
+ 1056-1064. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12224
849
+ Wigfield, A., & Meece, J. L. (1988). Math anxiety in elementary and secondary school students.
850
+ Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.210
851
+ Wu, S. S., Barth, M., Amin, H., Malcarne, V., & Menon, V. (2012). Math anxiety in second and third
852
+ graders and its relation to mathematics achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(162).
853
+ https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00162
854
+ Yadav, P., Chauhan, V. S., Bhat, P. S., Agarwal, N., Yadav, C., & Bhatia, S. (2017). Cross-sectional
855
+ study of anxiety symptoms in students in preexamination period. Industrial Psychiatry Journal,
856
+ 26(1), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_40_17
857
+ Zhang, J., Zhao, N., & Kong, Q, P. (2019). The relationship between math anxiety and math
858
+ performance: A meta-analytic investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1613.
859
+ https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01613
860
+
861
+
C9FRT4oBgHgl3EQfwjj-/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/tmp_files/2301.02188v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+ 1
4
+ Deterministic multi-level spin orbit torque switching
5
+ using focused He+ ion beam irradiation
6
+ Jinu Kurian1, Aleena Joseph1, Salia Cherifi-Hertel1, Ciaran Fowley2, Gregor Hlawacek2, Peter Dunne1,
7
+ Michelangelo Romeo1, Gwenaël Atcheson3, J. M. D. Coey3, Bernard Doudin1*
8
+ 1Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPCMS UMR 7504, 23 rue du Loess, F-67034 Strasbourg, France
9
+ 2Institute of Ion Beam Physics and Materials Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf,
10
+ Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany
11
+ 3AMBER and School of Physics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
12
+ * Corresponding author; email: [email protected]
13
+
14
+ KEYWORDS spintronics, spin orbit torque switching, nanomagnetism, ion beam irradiation, Hall bars
15
+
16
+ He+ ion irradiation is used to pattern multiple areas of Pt/Co/W films with different
17
+ irradiation doses in Hall bars. The resulting perpendicular magnetic anisotropy landscape
18
+ enables selective multilevel current-induced switching, with full deterministic control of the
19
+ position and order of the individual switching elements. Key pattern design parameters are
20
+ specified, opening a way to scalable multilevel switching devices.
21
+
22
+ Spin orbit torque (SOT) magnetic memory devices have unique advantages in terms of low power
23
+ consumption, fast operation capabilities and simplified circuitry design, placing them at the forefront
24
+ of information technology development.1–3 Their current-induced switching properties rely on the
25
+ perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) of their thin magnetic layers, which is readily modified by
26
+ light ion irradiation.4 We have previously shown the benefit of combining nanometer-scale
27
+ irradiation in a He+ microscope with in situ electronic transport property measurements to reveal
28
+ how the local PMA evolves under irradiation.5 Reduction of the PMA in specific locations makes
29
+ selective SOT switching of magnetic bits possible. Our purpose here is to show how this technique
30
+ can be extended to multiple irradiation zones in the same device, taking advantage of fine tuning the
31
+ spatial distribution of PMA calibration, to achieve multi-level switching in devices.
32
+ Multi-level storage is a promising approach to increase memory density6 while avoiding the
33
+ addressability problems associated with size reduction. Increasing the number of available states by
34
+ a factor N leads to an N-fold improvement in the density of memory without any change to the
35
+ device geometry. Multi-level SOT devices can also be exploited for bio-inspired computing
36
+ architectures, such as neuromorphic computing based on spintronics7,8, and multi-level switching
37
+
38
+
39
+
40
+ 2
41
+ has been achieved in PMA heterostructures in many ways. These include stabilizing intermediate
42
+ multidomain states by means of multi-ferromagnetic layer stacks,9–12 wedged magnetic layers,13,14
43
+ ferrimagnetic15,16, ferromagnetic/antiferromagnetic structures17, or with interleaved interfaces with
44
+ different spin Hall angles.18 A different approach defines the multiple levels as a sequence of
45
+ pinning-depinning states in SOT-driven reversal19,20, which has been shown in both irradiated and
46
+ non-irradiated single magnetic films21. Here, several unique states are accessible using shaped
47
+ current pulses22, but the exact magnetic configuration is highly dependent on sample fabrication and
48
+ reproducibility.23 Our aim is to create well-defined, reproducible, deterministic states, that are
49
+ addressable by SOT switching, and avoid the limitations of sample reproducibility.
50
+ Thin film stacks of Ta (5.0)/Pt (2.0)/Co (1.2)/W (1.5)/Pt (1.5)/Ta (1.5) (thickness in nm) were grown
51
+ on thermally-oxidized Si substrates by DC magnetron sputtering at room temperature. The Ta (5.0)
52
+ seed layer ensure good adhesion and (111) texture of Pt that promotes perpendicular anisotropy of
53
+ the Co layer.24 The heterostructure of Co sandwiched between Pt and W was chosen to optimize SOT
54
+ switching efficiency due to opposite signs of the spin Hall angles of Pt and W. The PMA of the cobalt
55
+ was confirmed by magnetometry. Films were patterned into Hall bar structures of width 10 µm and
56
+ length 180 µm by UV lithography. The Hall crosses were irradiated using an Orion Nanofab helium
57
+ ion microscope system while monitoring the evolution of the anomalous Hall resistance (RAHE) in-
58
+ situ. (Figure 1 a,b)5. For uniformly irradiated Hall crosses, RAHE gradually decreases with irradiation
59
+ until there is a sharp drop at a critical dose of 42.5 ± 2 ions/nm2, where the easy axis of
60
+ Figure 1. (a) Schematic of SOT setup of a patterned Hall bar undergoing He+ irradiation with the directions of current and magnetic
61
+ field indicated. (b) Evolution of in-situ anomalous Hall resistance with irradiation, the letters P,Q indicate the two-zone irradiation
62
+ doses shown in Fig. 2a, and A-D the four-zone doses shown in Fig. 3a. The magnetic anisotropy field (orange squares) as a function of
63
+ irradiation, deduced from Hall measurement on ex-situ samples, is also indicated. (d) Comparison of SOT induced magnetization
64
+ switching before and after irradiating with 35 ions/nm2 under a 100 mT bias field.
65
+
66
+
67
+ 0.0
68
+ 1.0
69
+ -0.2.
70
+ 0.8
71
+ -0.4
72
+ 0.6
73
+ -0.6.
74
+ 0.4
75
+ -0.8
76
+ 0.2
77
+
78
+ 3
79
+ magnetization flips from out-of-plane to in-plane. The critical dose is reproducible within 5% from
80
+ sample-to-sample.
81
+ The magnetic anisotropy field (Fig. 1b) was measured ex-situ by Hall effect as a function of applied
82
+ field. Hall measurements were performed under 1mA bias current. SOT-induced switching
83
+ experiments were performed with 1 ms current pulses in an interval of 1 s, under 100 mT bias field
84
+ applied along the current direction (Fig. 1c) . An average current density values of approximately 8
85
+ MA/cm2 corresponds to a 10 mA pulse current. Our experimental procedure does not give
86
+ indications of long-term sample Joule heating if the current stress remains below typically 35 mA.
87
+ One can imagine Joule heating during the 1 ms current pulse, but we found that the current
88
+ hysteresis curves remain fully reproducible (within a few percent) if the current sweeps does not
89
+ exceed 35 mA, providing confidence that the current stress does not impact the Co thin film and its
90
+ interface down the atomic level. The observed trends in the critical dose, fall in anisotropy and
91
+ reduced critical current are consistent with our previous work.5 Fig. 1c compares the SOT switching
92
+ hysteresis curve of a non-irradiated cross and one irradiated, illustrating the reduction of switching
93
+ current after irradiation with 35 ions nm-2Further characterisation and calibration of both the
94
+ magnetic anisotropy as well as SOT switching currents was carried out for several doses below the
95
+ critical dose. In this work, we focus on Hall crosses which were individual well-defined zones were
96
+ irradiated with different doses.
97
+ Figure 2. (a) Schematic of a two-zone irradiated sample (doses P,Q Fig. 1b) with and without a gap between irradiated zones, and two
98
+ boundary zones Q0 to minimize domain wall propagation during SOT switching (see text). (b) SOT induced magnetization switching of two
99
+ junctions with and without a gap between two irradiated zones with dose 23 ions/nm2 and 35 ions/nm2 at a bias field of 125 mT. (c) MOKE
100
+ images of the SOT induced magnetization switching when sweeping the current from +21 mA to -21 mA, and then (below broken line)
101
+ back to +21 mA. Intermediate currents (21 to -5 mA, and -21 to 5 mA) where the magnetization does not switch are not shown.
102
+
103
+
104
+ P
105
+ -
106
+
107
+ 4
108
+ Fig. 2 details the simplest case of a two-zone irradiation device, with one zone irradiated with 23
109
+ ions nm-2 (dose denoted ‘P’ in Fig. 1b) and the other with 35 ions nm-2 (‘Q’). For a direct comparison
110
+ we irradiated neighbouring Hall crosses, labelled 1 and 2 in Fig. 2a. In cross 1 the irradiated zones are
111
+ adjacent to each other, whereas in cross 2 they are separated by approximately 1 µm. In both
112
+ crosses, we detect additional resistance states due to the different magnetic anisotropies of the two
113
+ zones P & Q, denoted as ↑↑, ↑↓, ↓↑ and ↓↓ (Fig. 2b). These states have unique RAHE values and are
114
+ accessible by cycling the applied current pulses. We found that measured Hall resistance values were
115
+ stable within 1% over many hours. The resulting states are non-volatile, holding their resistance
116
+ values for at least two days. The switching currents of the irradiated areas are also reproducible
117
+ within a few percent when repeating the current sweeps. Magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE)
118
+ microscopy confirms the correspondence between the Hall resistance data and the switching of each
119
+ irradiated area, allowing us to visualize the resulting magnetic configurations (Fig. 2). The boundary
120
+ of non-irradiated and irradiated zones are known to pin propagating domain walls during magnetic
121
+ field driven reversal25,26, and are found to play such a role in the SOT induced switching by Kerr
122
+ microscopy visualisation (not shown here). We found that it was crucial to irradiate magnetic
123
+ boundary zones on either side of the Hall cross, marked ‘Q0’ in Fig. 2a, using a near-critical dose so
124
+ that these zones switch at the smallest currents. This inhibits propagation of magnetization reversal
125
+ from far away in the main bar into the cross, which would interfere with the Hall measurement.
126
+ Essentially, this additional irradiation acts to isolate the magnetic switching behaviour of a cross,
127
+ without severing its electrical contacts. Unfortunately, we found that reproducibility of the switching
128
+ current of unirradiated zones surrounded by Q0 irradiated areas was quite poor, but nevertheless
129
+ sufficient to avoid a nucleation of reversal far from the sample of interest at lower current values
130
+ than those switching irradiated areas.
131
+ Fig. 2 also illustrates how independent switching of the two zones P and Q can be improved by
132
+ leaving a non-irradiated strip between them. A width of 1 µm was chosen to allow adequate
133
+ resolution in the Kerr microscope. Under a bias field of 125 mT we find a clear independent SOT
134
+ switching of P and Q in both the measured Hall resistance (Fig. 2b) and MOKE imaging (Fig. 2c) only
135
+ when there is an irradiation gap (P2, Q2). When the current is swept from 21 to -21mA, the zones
136
+ irradiated with 35 ions nm-2, Q1,Q2 , selectively switch at -5 mA and the adjacent irradiated zone, P1,
137
+ reverses its magnetization continuously between -7 mA and -8 mA. In contrast, the zone P2,
138
+ separated by the non-irradiated gap, switches at -11 mA. This larger critical current results from
139
+ domain wall pinning in the unirradiated zone which retains the larger initial PMA, preventing the
140
+ reversal of one zone to expand to the neighbouring one. Note that for this sample, the unirradiated
141
+ areas switch at current values similar to Q2, which explains why the antiparallel state does not
142
+ correspond to zero RAHE.
143
+ Irradiation of multiple zones within a Hall cross illustrate the scalability of this process. Four zones,
144
+ A–D, separated by 1 µm gaps and irradiated with different doses, 35, 27, 20 and 13 ions nm-2, are
145
+ shown in Fig. 3a. As with the sample shown in Fig. 2, magnetic isolation bands, Q0, were irradiated
146
+ either size of the junction with a dose of 35 ions nm-2, protecting the unirradiated zone against
147
+ switching up to 20 mA current. The SOT induced switching of the device under a bias field of 125 mT
148
+ in Fig. 3b shows the three intermediate steps corresponding to the independent switching of the
149
+ four zones upon sweeping applied current. MOKE microscopy confirms this interpretation of the AHE
150
+ data (Fig. 3c), displaying a sequential switch of each area from lowest to highest PMA, i.e. from
151
+ highest to lowest ion dose. This demonstrates that our approach can be extended to irradiate N
152
+
153
+
154
+
155
+ 5
156
+ zones with different doses, across different areas. We expect the domain wall width to define the
157
+ scale of the minimum bit size, leading to a separation wall of a few tens of nm for individual cells
158
+ below the 100 nm size range. This is well within the resolution limits of the irradiation process but is
159
+ challenging for magnetic imaging and electrical detection and is beyond the scope of this paper.
160
+
161
+ In summary, magnetic anisotropy engineering by appropriate multi-zone He-ion irradiation makes
162
+ multi-level switching of magnetic configurations robust and predictable. Our experimental design
163
+ was chosen for maximum simplicity, to demonstrate that we can independently switch the magnetic
164
+ state of individually irradiated areas in a single Hall cross. Moreover, by taking advantage of the
165
+ hysteresis properties of the current-induced switching, many macrospin configurations become
166
+ accessible (green arrows in Fig. 2b), and one can imagine switching any combination of the
167
+ macrospin presented in Fig. 2. This would allow the number of distinct electrical states to be much
168
+ larger than the number of irradiated zones N. More sophisticated designs are also possible on a
169
+ smaller scale, for example where a switching of a given area influences its neighbour via its magnetic
170
+ stray field. Furthermore, ion irradiation is compatible with other approaches for realizing multistate
171
+ memories without altering their physical design, such as more sophisticated magnetic stacks, wedge
172
+ layers or lithographic patterns.8-16 We believe that the strategy we have outlined proposes a
173
+ versatile strategy to realize high-density and low-power-consumption SOT-based memory devices
174
+ and is relevant for future types of computing architecture.
175
+ Author Contributions
176
+ P.D., C.F. and J.K. initially designed the experiment, J.K. and A.J. performed most experiments, G.A.
177
+ and J.M.D.C. helped for the materials fabrication, G.H. C.F. for the ion irradiation, S.C. and M.R. for
178
+ Kerr measurements. B.D. and J.M.D.C. supervised the experiments. J.K., A.J. and B.D. wrote the
179
+ manuscript, where all authors contributed to its improvement.
180
+ Acknowledgements
181
+ We thank Fabien Chevrier and the staff of the STnano nanofabrication facility for daily support. This
182
+ project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation
183
+ Figure 3. (a) Schematic of the four zones of a junction irradiated with doses 13 ions nm-2, 20 ions nm-2, 27 ions nm-2 and 35 ions nm-2. (b)
184
+ MOKE acquired SOT induced magnetization switching of the junction under a bias field of 125 mT. (c) MOKE images of the SOT induced
185
+ magnetization switching of the junction when sweeping from 21 to – 25 mA.
186
+
187
+
188
+ B
189
+ D
190
+ A
191
+
192
+ 6
193
+ programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement MaMi No. 766007 and QUSTEC No.
194
+ 847471, the Interdisciplinary Thematic Institute QMat, as part of the ITI 2021 2028 program of the
195
+ University of Strasbourg, CNRS and Inserm, was supported by IdEx Unistra (ANR 10 IDEX 0002), and
196
+ by SFRI STRAT'US project (ANR 20 SFRI 0012) and EUR QMAT ANR-17-EURE-0024 under the
197
+ framework of the French Investments for the Future Program.
198
+ Conflicts of interest
199
+ There are no conflicts of interest
200
+
201
+ References
202
+ 1 I.M. Miron, G. Gaudin, S. Auffret, B. Rodmacq, A. Schuhl, S. Pizzini, J. Vogel, and P. Gambardella,
203
+ Nature Materials 9, 230 (2010).
204
+ 2 K. Garello, C.O. Avci, I.M. Miron, M. Baumgartner, A. Ghosh, S. Auffret, O. Boulle, G. Gaudin, and P.
205
+ Gambardella, Applied Physics Letters 105, 212402 (2014).
206
+ 3 K. Garello, F. Yasin, S. Couet, L. Souriau, J. Swerts, S. Rao, S. Van Beek, W. Kim, E. Liu, S. Kundu, D.
207
+ Tsvetanova, K. Croes, N. Jossart, E. Grimaldi, M. Baumgartner, D. Crotti, A. Fumémont, P.
208
+ Gambardella, and G.S. Kar, in 2018 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits (2018), pp. 81–82.
209
+ 4 J. Fassbender, D. Ravelosona, and Y. Samson, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 37, R179 (2004).
210
+ 5 P. Dunne, C. Fowley, G. Hlawacek, J. Kurian, G. Atcheson, S. Colis, N. Teichert, B. Kundys, M.
211
+ Venkatesan, J. Lindner, A.M. Deac, T.M. Hermans, J.M.D. Coey, and B. Doudin, Nano Lett. 20, 7036
212
+ (2020).
213
+ 6 J.E. Bickel, M. Khan, and K.E. Aidala, Journal of Applied Physics 115, 17D511 (2014).
214
+ 7 J. Grollier, D. Querlioz, K.Y. Camsari, K. Everschor-Sitte, S. Fukami, and M.D. Stiles, Nat Electron 3,
215
+ 360 (2020).
216
+ 8 S. Fukami and H. Ohno, Journal of Applied Physics 124, 151904 (2018).
217
+ 9 K.-F. Huang, D.-S. Wang, M.-H. Tsai, H.-H. Lin, and C.-H. Lai, Advanced Materials 29, 1601575
218
+ (2017).
219
+ 10 Y. Sheng, Y.C. Li, X.Q. Ma, and K.Y. Wang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 112406 (2018).
220
+ 11 Y. Cao, A. Rushforth, Y. Sheng, H. Zheng, and K. Wang, Advanced Functional Materials 29, 1808104
221
+ (2019).
222
+ 12 L. Liu, X. Zhao, W. Liu, Y. Song, X. Zhao, and Z. Zhang, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 54, 505003 (2021).
223
+ 13 S. Chen, R. Mishra, H. Chen, H. Yang, and X. Qiu, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 55, 095001 (2022).
224
+ 14 D. Li, B. Cui, X. Guo, Z. Xiao, W. Zhang, X. Jia, J. Duan, X. Liu, J. Chen, Z. Quan, G. Yu, and X. Xu, APL
225
+ Materials 9, 071108 (2021).
226
+ 15 Z. Zheng, Y. Zhang, X. Feng, K. Zhang, J. Nan, Z. Zhang, G. Wang, J. Wang, N. Lei, D. Liu, Y. Zhang,
227
+ and W. Zhao, Phys. Rev. Applied 12, 044032 (2019).
228
+ 16 Z. Zhang, Z. Zheng, Y. Zhang, J. Sun, K. Lin, K. Zhang, X. Feng, L. Chen, J. Wang, G. Wang, Y. Du, Y.
229
+ Zhang, A. Bournel, P.K. Amiri, and W. Zhao, IEEE Electron Device Letters 42, 152 (2021).
230
+ 17 J. Yun, Q. Bai, Z. Yan, M. Chang, J. Mao, Y. Zuo, D. Yang, L. Xi, and D. Xue, Advanced Functional
231
+ Materials 30, 1909092 (2020).
232
+ 18 Y. Song, X. Zhao, W. Liu, L. Liu, S. Li, and Z. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 232408 (2020).
233
+ 19 X. Zhao, Y. Liu, D. Zhu, M. Sall, X. Zhang, H. Ma, J. Langer, B. Ocker, S. Jaiswal, G. Jakob, M. Kläui,
234
+ W. Zhao, and D. Ravelosona, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 242401 (2020).
235
+ 20 M. Yang, Y. Li, J. Luo, Y. Deng, N. Zhang, X. Zhang, S. Li, Y. Cui, P. Yu, T. Yang, Y. Sheng, S. Wang, J.
236
+ Xu, C. Zhao, and K. Wang, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 054013 (2021).
237
+ 21 S. Zhang, Y. Su, X. Li, R. Li, W. Tian, J. Hong, and L. You, Appl. Phys. Lett. 114, 042401 (2019).
238
+ 22 J. Lourembam, L. Huang, B. Chen, J. Qiu, H.J. Chung, S.L.K. Yap, Q.J. Yap, S.K. Wong, and S.T. Lim,
239
+ Advanced Electronic Materials 7, 2001133 (2021).
240
+
241
+
242
+
243
+ 7
244
+ 23 S. Das, A. Zaig, H. Nhalil, L. Avraham, M. Schultz, and L. Klein, Scientific Reports 9, 20368 (2019).
245
+ 24 R. Law, R. Sbiaa, T. Liew, and T.C. Chong, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 242504 (2007).
246
+ 25 T. Devolder, C. Chappert, Y. Chen, E. Cambril, H. Bernas, J.P. Jamet, and J. Ferré, Appl. Phys. Lett.
247
+ 74, 3383 (1999).
248
+ 26 J.H. Franken, M. Hoeijmakers, R. Lavrijsen, J.T. Kohlhepp, H.J.M. Swagten, B. Koopmans, E. van
249
+ Veldhoven, and D.J. Maas, Journal of Applied Physics 109, 07D504 (2011).
250
+
251
+
CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,482 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ filepath=/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf,len=481
2
+ page_content='1 Deterministic multi-level spin orbit torque switching using focused He+ ion beam irradiation Jinu Kurian1, Aleena Joseph1, Salia Cherifi-Hertel1, Ciaran Fowley2, Gregor Hlawacek2, Peter Dunne1, Michelangelo Romeo1, Gwenaël Atcheson3, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
3
+ page_content=' M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
4
+ page_content=' D.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
5
+ page_content=' Coey3, Bernard Doudin1* 1Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPCMS UMR 7504, 23 rue du Loess, F-67034 Strasbourg, France 2Institute of Ion Beam Physics and Materials Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany 3AMBER and School of Physics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland * Corresponding author;' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
6
+ page_content=' email: bernard.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
7
+ page_content='doudin@ipcms.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
8
+ page_content='unistra.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
9
+ page_content='fr KEYWORDS spintronics, spin orbit torque switching, nanomagnetism, ion beam irradiation, Hall bars He+ ion irradiation is used to pattern multiple areas of Pt/Co/W films with different irradiation doses in Hall bars.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
10
+ page_content=' The resulting perpendicular magnetic anisotropy landscape enables selective multilevel current-induced switching, with full deterministic control of the position and order of the individual switching elements.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
11
+ page_content=' Key pattern design parameters are specified, opening a way to scalable multilevel switching devices.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
12
+ page_content=' Spin orbit torque (SOT) magnetic memory devices have unique advantages in terms of low power consumption, fast operation capabilities and simplified circuitry design, placing them at the forefront of information technology development.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
13
+ page_content='1–3 Their current-induced switching properties rely on the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) of their thin magnetic layers, which is readily modified by light ion irradiation.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
14
+ page_content='4 We have previously shown the benefit of combining nanometer-scale irradiation in a He+ microscope with in situ electronic transport property measurements to reveal how the local PMA evolves under irradiation.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
15
+ page_content='5 Reduction of the PMA in specific locations makes selective SOT switching of magnetic bits possible.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
16
+ page_content=' Our purpose here is to show how this technique can be extended to multiple irradiation zones in the same device, taking advantage of fine tuning the spatial distribution of PMA calibration, to achieve multi-level switching in devices.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
17
+ page_content=' Multi-level storage is a promising approach to increase memory density6 while avoiding the addressability problems associated with size reduction.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
18
+ page_content=' Increasing the number of available states by a factor N leads to an N-fold improvement in the density of memory without any change to the device geometry.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
19
+ page_content=' Multi-level SOT devices can also be exploited for bio-inspired computing architectures, such as neuromorphic computing based on spintronics7,8, and multi-level switching 2 has been achieved in PMA heterostructures in many ways.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
20
+ page_content=' These include stabilizing intermediate multidomain states by means of multi-ferromagnetic layer stacks,9–12 wedged magnetic layers,13,14 ferrimagnetic15,16, ferromagnetic/antiferromagnetic structures17, or with interleaved interfaces with different spin Hall angles.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
21
+ page_content='18 A different approach defines the multiple levels as a sequence of pinning-depinning states in SOT-driven reversal19,20, which has been shown in both irradiated and non-irradiated single magnetic films21.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
22
+ page_content=' Here, several unique states are accessible using shaped current pulses22, but the exact magnetic configuration is highly dependent on sample fabrication and reproducibility.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
23
+ page_content='23 Our aim is to create well-defined, reproducible, deterministic states, that are addressable by SOT switching, and avoid the limitations of sample reproducibility.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
24
+ page_content=' Thin film stacks of Ta (5.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
25
+ page_content='0)/Pt (2.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
26
+ page_content='0)/Co (1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
27
+ page_content='2)/W (1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
28
+ page_content='5)/Pt (1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
29
+ page_content='5)/Ta (1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
30
+ page_content='5) (thickness in nm) were grown on thermally-oxidized Si substrates by DC magnetron sputtering at room temperature.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
31
+ page_content=' The Ta (5.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
32
+ page_content='0) seed layer ensure good adhesion and (111) texture of Pt that promotes perpendicular anisotropy of the Co layer.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
33
+ page_content='24 The heterostructure of Co sandwiched between Pt and W was chosen to optimize SOT switching efficiency due to opposite signs of the spin Hall angles of Pt and W.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
34
+ page_content=' The PMA of the cobalt was confirmed by magnetometry.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
35
+ page_content=' Films were patterned into Hall bar structures of width 10 µm and length 180 µm by UV lithography.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
36
+ page_content=' The Hall crosses were irradiated using an Orion Nanofab helium ion microscope system while monitoring the evolution of the anomalous Hall resistance (RAHE) in- situ.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
37
+ page_content=' (Figure 1 a,b)5.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
38
+ page_content=' For uniformly irradiated Hall crosses, RAHE gradually decreases with irradiation until there is a sharp drop at a critical dose of 42.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
39
+ page_content='5 ± 2 ions/nm2, where the easy axis of Figure 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
40
+ page_content=' (a) Schematic of SOT setup of a patterned Hall bar undergoing He+ irradiation with the directions of current and magnetic field indicated.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
41
+ page_content=' (b) Evolution of in-situ anomalous Hall resistance with irradiation, the letters P,Q indicate the two-zone irradiation doses shown in Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
42
+ page_content=' 2a, and A-D the four-zone doses shown in Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
43
+ page_content=' 3a.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
44
+ page_content=' The magnetic anisotropy field (orange squares) as a function of irradiation, deduced from Hall measurement on ex-situ samples, is also indicated.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
45
+ page_content=' (d) Comparison of SOT induced magnetization switching before and after irradiating with 35 ions/nm2 under a 100 mT bias field.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
46
+ page_content=' 0.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
47
+ page_content='0 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
48
+ page_content='0 0.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
49
+ page_content='2.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
50
+ page_content=' 0.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
51
+ page_content='8 0.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
52
+ page_content='4 0.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
53
+ page_content='6 0.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
54
+ page_content='6.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
55
+ page_content=' 0.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
56
+ page_content='4 0.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
57
+ page_content='8 0.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
58
+ page_content='2 3 magnetization flips from out-of-plane to in-plane.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
59
+ page_content=' The critical dose is reproducible within 5% from sample-to-sample.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
60
+ page_content=' The magnetic anisotropy field (Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
61
+ page_content=' 1b) was measured ex-situ by Hall effect as a function of applied field.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
62
+ page_content=' Hall measurements were performed under 1mA bias current.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
63
+ page_content=' SOT-induced switching experiments were performed with 1 ms current pulses in an interval of 1 s, under 100 mT bias field applied along the current direction (Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
64
+ page_content=' 1c) .' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
65
+ page_content=' An average current density values of approximately 8 MA/cm2 corresponds to a 10 mA pulse current.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
66
+ page_content=' Our experimental procedure does not give indications of long-term sample Joule heating if the current stress remains below typically 35 mA.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
67
+ page_content=' One can imagine Joule heating during the 1 ms current pulse, but we found that the current hysteresis curves remain fully reproducible (within a few percent) if the current sweeps does not exceed 35 mA, providing confidence that the current stress does not impact the Co thin film and its interface down the atomic level.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
68
+ page_content=' The observed trends in the critical dose, fall in anisotropy and reduced critical current are consistent with our previous work.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
69
+ page_content='5 Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
70
+ page_content=' 1c compares the SOT switching hysteresis curve of a non-irradiated cross and one irradiated, illustrating the reduction of switching current after irradiation with 35 ions nm-2Further characterisation and calibration of both the magnetic anisotropy as well as SOT switching currents was carried out for several doses below the critical dose.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
71
+ page_content=' In this work, we focus on Hall crosses which were individual well-defined zones were irradiated with different doses.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
72
+ page_content=' Figure 2.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
73
+ page_content=' (a) Schematic of a two-zone irradiated sample (doses P,Q Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
74
+ page_content=' 1b) with and without a gap between irradiated zones, and two boundary zones Q0 to minimize domain wall propagation during SOT switching (see text).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
75
+ page_content=' (b) SOT induced magnetization switching of two junctions with and without a gap between two irradiated zones with dose 23 ions/nm2 and 35 ions/nm2 at a bias field of 125 mT.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
76
+ page_content=' (c) MOKE images of the SOT induced magnetization switching when sweeping the current from +21 mA to -21 mA, and then (below broken line) back to +21 mA.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
77
+ page_content=' Intermediate currents (21 to -5 mA, and -21 to 5 mA) where the magnetization does not switch are not shown.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
78
+ page_content=' P 4 Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
79
+ page_content=' 2 details the simplest case of a two-zone irradiation device, with one zone irradiated with 23 ions nm-2 (dose denoted ‘P’ in Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
80
+ page_content=' 1b) and the other with 35 ions nm-2 (‘Q’).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
81
+ page_content=' For a direct comparison we irradiated neighbouring Hall crosses, labelled 1 and 2 in Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
82
+ page_content=' 2a.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
83
+ page_content=' In cross 1 the irradiated zones are adjacent to each other, whereas in cross 2 they are separated by approximately 1 µm.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
84
+ page_content=' In both crosses, we detect additional resistance states due to the different magnetic anisotropies of the two zones P & Q, denoted as ↑↑, ↑↓, ↓↑ and ↓↓ (Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
85
+ page_content=' 2b).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
86
+ page_content=' These states have unique RAHE values and are accessible by cycling the applied current pulses.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
87
+ page_content=' We found that measured Hall resistance values were stable within 1% over many hours.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
88
+ page_content=' The resulting states are non-volatile, holding their resistance values for at least two days.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
89
+ page_content=' The switching currents of the irradiated areas are also reproducible within a few percent when repeating the current sweeps.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
90
+ page_content=' Magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) microscopy confirms the correspondence between the Hall resistance data and the switching of each irradiated area, allowing us to visualize the resulting magnetic configurations (Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
91
+ page_content=' 2).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
92
+ page_content=' The boundary of non-irradiated and irradiated zones are known to pin propagating domain walls during magnetic field driven reversal25,26, and are found to play such a role in the SOT induced switching by Kerr microscopy visualisation (not shown here).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
93
+ page_content=' We found that it was crucial to irradiate magnetic boundary zones on either side of the Hall cross, marked ‘Q0’ in Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
94
+ page_content=' 2a, using a near-critical dose so that these zones switch at the smallest currents.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
95
+ page_content=' This inhibits propagation of magnetization reversal from far away in the main bar into the cross, which would interfere with the Hall measurement.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
96
+ page_content=' Essentially, this additional irradiation acts to isolate the magnetic switching behaviour of a cross, without severing its electrical contacts.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
97
+ page_content=' Unfortunately, we found that reproducibility of the switching current of unirradiated zones surrounded by Q0 irradiated areas was quite poor, but nevertheless sufficient to avoid a nucleation of reversal far from the sample of interest at lower current values than those switching irradiated areas.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
98
+ page_content=' Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
99
+ page_content=' 2 also illustrates how independent switching of the two zones P and Q can be improved by leaving a non-irradiated strip between them.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
100
+ page_content=' A width of 1 µm was chosen to allow adequate resolution in the Kerr microscope.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
101
+ page_content=' Under a bias field of 125 mT we find a clear independent SOT switching of P and Q in both the measured Hall resistance (Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
102
+ page_content=' 2b) and MOKE imaging (Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
103
+ page_content=' 2c) only when there is an irradiation gap (P2, Q2).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
104
+ page_content=' When the current is swept from 21 to -21mA, the zones irradiated with 35 ions nm-2, Q1,Q2 , selectively switch at -5 mA and the adjacent irradiated zone, P1, reverses its magnetization continuously between -7 mA and -8 mA.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
105
+ page_content=' In contrast, the zone P2, separated by the non-irradiated gap, switches at -11 mA.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
106
+ page_content=' This larger critical current results from domain wall pinning in the unirradiated zone which retains the larger initial PMA, preventing the reversal of one zone to expand to the neighbouring one.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
107
+ page_content=' Note that for this sample, the unirradiated areas switch at current values similar to Q2, which explains why the antiparallel state does not correspond to zero RAHE.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
108
+ page_content=' Irradiation of multiple zones within a Hall cross illustrate the scalability of this process.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
109
+ page_content=' Four zones, A–D, separated by 1 µm gaps and irradiated with different doses, 35, 27, 20 and 13 ions nm-2, are shown in Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
110
+ page_content=' 3a.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
111
+ page_content=' As with the sample shown in Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
112
+ page_content=' 2, magnetic isolation bands, Q0, were irradiated either size of the junction with a dose of 35 ions nm-2, protecting the unirradiated zone against switching up to 20 mA current.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
113
+ page_content=' The SOT induced switching of the device under a bias field of 125 mT in Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
114
+ page_content=' 3b shows the three intermediate steps corresponding to the independent switching of the four zones upon sweeping applied current.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
115
+ page_content=' MOKE microscopy confirms this interpretation of the AHE data (Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
116
+ page_content=' 3c), displaying a sequential switch of each area from lowest to highest PMA, i.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
117
+ page_content='e.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
118
+ page_content=' from highest to lowest ion dose.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
119
+ page_content=' This demonstrates that our approach can be extended to irradiate N 5 zones with different doses, across different areas.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
120
+ page_content=' We expect the domain wall width to define the scale of the minimum bit size, leading to a separation wall of a few tens of nm for individual cells below the 100 nm size range.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
121
+ page_content=' This is well within the resolution limits of the irradiation process but is challenging for magnetic imaging and electrical detection and is beyond the scope of this paper.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
122
+ page_content=' In summary, magnetic anisotropy engineering by appropriate multi-zone He-ion irradiation makes multi-level switching of magnetic configurations robust and predictable.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
123
+ page_content=' Our experimental design was chosen for maximum simplicity, to demonstrate that we can independently switch the magnetic state of individually irradiated areas in a single Hall cross.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
124
+ page_content=' Moreover, by taking advantage of the hysteresis properties of the current-induced switching, many macrospin configurations become accessible (green arrows in Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
125
+ page_content=' 2b), and one can imagine switching any combination of the macrospin presented in Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
126
+ page_content=' 2.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
127
+ page_content=' This would allow the number of distinct electrical states to be much larger than the number of irradiated zones N.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
128
+ page_content=' More sophisticated designs are also possible on a smaller scale, for example where a switching of a given area influences its neighbour via its magnetic stray field.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
129
+ page_content=' Furthermore, ion irradiation is compatible with other approaches for realizing multistate memories without altering their physical design, such as more sophisticated magnetic stacks, wedge layers or lithographic patterns.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
130
+ page_content='8-16 We believe that the strategy we have outlined proposes a versatile strategy to realize high-density and low-power-consumption SOT-based memory devices and is relevant for future types of computing architecture.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
131
+ page_content=' Author Contributions P.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
132
+ page_content='D.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
133
+ page_content=', C.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
134
+ page_content='F.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
135
+ page_content=' and J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
136
+ page_content='K.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
137
+ page_content=' initially designed the experiment, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
138
+ page_content='K.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
139
+ page_content=' and A.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
140
+ page_content='J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
141
+ page_content=' performed most experiments, G.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
142
+ page_content='A.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
143
+ page_content=' and J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
144
+ page_content='M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
145
+ page_content='D.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
146
+ page_content='C.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
147
+ page_content=' helped for the materials fabrication, G.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
148
+ page_content='H.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
149
+ page_content=' C.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
150
+ page_content='F.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
151
+ page_content=' for the ion irradiation, S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
152
+ page_content='C.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
153
+ page_content=' and M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
154
+ page_content='R.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
155
+ page_content=' for Kerr measurements.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
156
+ page_content=' B.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
157
+ page_content='D.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
158
+ page_content=' and J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
159
+ page_content='M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
160
+ page_content='D.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
161
+ page_content='C.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
162
+ page_content=' supervised the experiments.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
163
+ page_content=' J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
164
+ page_content='K.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
165
+ page_content=', A.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
166
+ page_content='J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
167
+ page_content=' and B.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
168
+ page_content='D.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
169
+ page_content=' wrote the manuscript, where all authors contributed to its improvement.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
170
+ page_content=' Acknowledgements We thank Fabien Chevrier and the staff of the STnano nanofabrication facility for daily support.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
171
+ page_content=' This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation Figure 3.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
172
+ page_content=' (a) Schematic of the four zones of a junction irradiated with doses 13 ions nm-2, 20 ions nm-2, 27 ions nm-2 and 35 ions nm-2.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
173
+ page_content=' (b) MOKE acquired SOT induced magnetization switching of the junction under a bias field of 125 mT.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
174
+ page_content=' (c) MOKE images of the SOT induced magnetization switching of the junction when sweeping from 21 to – 25 mA.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
175
+ page_content=' B D A 6 programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement MaMi No.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
176
+ page_content=' 766007 and QUSTEC No.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
177
+ page_content=" 847471, the Interdisciplinary Thematic Institute QMat, as part of the ITI 2021 2028 program of the University of Strasbourg, CNRS and Inserm, was supported by IdEx Unistra (ANR 10 IDEX 0002), and by SFRI STRAT'US project (ANR 20 SFRI 0012) and EUR QMAT ANR-17-EURE-0024 under the framework of the French Investments for the Future Program." metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
178
+ page_content=' Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest References 1 I.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
179
+ page_content='M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
180
+ page_content=' Miron, G.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
181
+ page_content=' Gaudin, S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
182
+ page_content=' Auffret, B.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
183
+ page_content=' Rodmacq, A.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
184
+ page_content=' Schuhl, S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
185
+ page_content=' Pizzini, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
186
+ page_content=' Vogel, and P.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
187
+ page_content=' Gambardella, Nature Materials 9, 230 (2010).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
188
+ page_content=' 2 K.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
189
+ page_content=' Garello, C.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
190
+ page_content='O.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
191
+ page_content=' Avci, I.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
192
+ page_content='M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
193
+ page_content=' Miron, M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
194
+ page_content=' Baumgartner, A.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
195
+ page_content=' Ghosh, S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
196
+ page_content=' Auffret, O.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
197
+ page_content=' Boulle, G.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
198
+ page_content=' Gaudin, and P.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
199
+ page_content=' Gambardella, Applied Physics Letters 105, 212402 (2014).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
200
+ page_content=' 3 K.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
201
+ page_content=' Garello, F.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
202
+ page_content=' Yasin, S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
203
+ page_content=' Couet, L.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
204
+ page_content=' Souriau, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
205
+ page_content=' Swerts, S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
206
+ page_content=' Rao, S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
207
+ page_content=' Van Beek, W.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
208
+ page_content=' Kim, E.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
209
+ page_content=' Liu, S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
210
+ page_content=' Kundu, D.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
211
+ page_content=' Tsvetanova, K.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
212
+ page_content=' Croes, N.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
213
+ page_content=' Jossart, E.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
214
+ page_content=' Grimaldi, M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
215
+ page_content=' Baumgartner, D.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
216
+ page_content=' Crotti, A.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
217
+ page_content=' Fumémont, P.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
218
+ page_content=' Gambardella, and G.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
219
+ page_content='S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
220
+ page_content=' Kar, in 2018 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits (2018), pp.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
221
+ page_content=' 81–82.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
222
+ page_content=' 4 J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
223
+ page_content=' Fassbender, D.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
224
+ page_content=' Ravelosona, and Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
225
+ page_content=' Samson, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 37, R179 (2004).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
226
+ page_content=' 5 P.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
227
+ page_content=' Dunne, C.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
228
+ page_content=' Fowley, G.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
229
+ page_content=' Hlawacek, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
230
+ page_content=' Kurian, G.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
231
+ page_content=' Atcheson, S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
232
+ page_content=' Colis, N.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
233
+ page_content=' Teichert, B.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
234
+ page_content=' Kundys, M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
235
+ page_content=' Venkatesan, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
236
+ page_content=' Lindner, A.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
237
+ page_content='M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
238
+ page_content=' Deac, T.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
239
+ page_content='M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
240
+ page_content=' Hermans, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
241
+ page_content='M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
242
+ page_content='D.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
243
+ page_content=' Coey, and B.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
244
+ page_content=' Doudin, Nano Lett.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
245
+ page_content=' 20, 7036 (2020).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
246
+ page_content=' 6 J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
247
+ page_content='E.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
248
+ page_content=' Bickel, M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
249
+ page_content=' Khan, and K.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
250
+ page_content='E.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
251
+ page_content=' Aidala, Journal of Applied Physics 115, 17D511 (2014).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
252
+ page_content=' 7 J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
253
+ page_content=' Grollier, D.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
254
+ page_content=' Querlioz, K.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
255
+ page_content='Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
256
+ page_content=' Camsari, K.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
257
+ page_content=' Everschor-Sitte, S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
258
+ page_content=' Fukami, and M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
259
+ page_content='D.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
260
+ page_content=' Stiles, Nat Electron 3, 360 (2020).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
261
+ page_content=' 8 S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
262
+ page_content=' Fukami and H.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
263
+ page_content=' Ohno, Journal of Applied Physics 124, 151904 (2018).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
264
+ page_content=' 9 K.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
265
+ page_content='-F.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
266
+ page_content=' Huang, D.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
267
+ page_content='-S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
268
+ page_content=' Wang, M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
269
+ page_content='-H.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
270
+ page_content=' Tsai, H.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
271
+ page_content='-H.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
272
+ page_content=' Lin, and C.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
273
+ page_content='-H.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
274
+ page_content=' Lai, Advanced Materials 29, 1601575 (2017).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
275
+ page_content=' 10 Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
276
+ page_content=' Sheng, Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
277
+ page_content='C.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
278
+ page_content=' Li, X.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
279
+ page_content='Q.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
280
+ page_content=' Ma, and K.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
281
+ page_content='Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
282
+ page_content=' Wang, Appl.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
283
+ page_content=' Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
284
+ page_content=' Lett.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
285
+ page_content=' 113, 112406 (2018).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
286
+ page_content=' 11 Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
287
+ page_content=' Cao, A.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
288
+ page_content=' Rushforth, Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
289
+ page_content=' Sheng, H.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
290
+ page_content=' Zheng, and K.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
291
+ page_content=' Wang, Advanced Functional Materials 29, 1808104 (2019).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
292
+ page_content=' 12 L.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
293
+ page_content=' Liu, X.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
294
+ page_content=' Zhao, W.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
295
+ page_content=' Liu, Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
296
+ page_content=' Song, X.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
297
+ page_content=' Zhao, and Z.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
298
+ page_content=' Zhang, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
299
+ page_content=' Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
300
+ page_content=' D: Appl.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
301
+ page_content=' Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
302
+ page_content=' 54, 505003 (2021).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
303
+ page_content=' 13 S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
304
+ page_content=' Chen, R.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
305
+ page_content=' Mishra, H.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
306
+ page_content=' Chen, H.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
307
+ page_content=' Yang, and X.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
308
+ page_content=' Qiu, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
309
+ page_content=' Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
310
+ page_content=' D: Appl.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
311
+ page_content=' Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
312
+ page_content=' 55, 095001 (2022).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
313
+ page_content=' 14 D.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
314
+ page_content=' Li, B.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
315
+ page_content=' Cui, X.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
316
+ page_content=' Guo, Z.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
317
+ page_content=' Xiao, W.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
318
+ page_content=' Zhang, X.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
319
+ page_content=' Jia, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
320
+ page_content=' Duan, X.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
321
+ page_content=' Liu, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
322
+ page_content=' Chen, Z.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
323
+ page_content=' Quan, G.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
324
+ page_content=' Yu, and X.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
325
+ page_content=' Xu, APL Materials 9, 071108 (2021).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
326
+ page_content=' 15 Z.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
327
+ page_content=' Zheng, Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
328
+ page_content=' Zhang, X.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
329
+ page_content=' Feng, K.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
330
+ page_content=' Zhang, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
331
+ page_content=' Nan, Z.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
332
+ page_content=' Zhang, G.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
333
+ page_content=' Wang, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
334
+ page_content=' Wang, N.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
335
+ page_content=' Lei, D.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
336
+ page_content=' Liu, Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
337
+ page_content=' Zhang, and W.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
338
+ page_content=' Zhao, Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
339
+ page_content=' Rev.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
340
+ page_content=' Applied 12, 044032 (2019).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
341
+ page_content=' 16 Z.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
342
+ page_content=' Zhang, Z.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
343
+ page_content=' Zheng, Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
344
+ page_content=' Zhang, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
345
+ page_content=' Sun, K.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
346
+ page_content=' Lin, K.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
347
+ page_content=' Zhang, X.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
348
+ page_content=' Feng, L.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
349
+ page_content=' Chen, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
350
+ page_content=' Wang, G.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
351
+ page_content=' Wang, Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
352
+ page_content=' Du, Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
353
+ page_content=' Zhang, A.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
354
+ page_content=' Bournel, P.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
355
+ page_content='K.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
356
+ page_content=' Amiri, and W.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
357
+ page_content=' Zhao, IEEE Electron Device Letters 42, 152 (2021).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
358
+ page_content=' 17 J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
359
+ page_content=' Yun, Q.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
360
+ page_content=' Bai, Z.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
361
+ page_content=' Yan, M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
362
+ page_content=' Chang, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
363
+ page_content=' Mao, Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
364
+ page_content=' Zuo, D.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
365
+ page_content=' Yang, L.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
366
+ page_content=' Xi, and D.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
367
+ page_content=' Xue, Advanced Functional Materials 30, 1909092 (2020).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
368
+ page_content=' 18 Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
369
+ page_content=' Song, X.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
370
+ page_content=' Zhao, W.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
371
+ page_content=' Liu, L.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
372
+ page_content=' Liu, S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
373
+ page_content=' Li, and Z.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
374
+ page_content=' Zhang, Appl.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
375
+ page_content=' Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
376
+ page_content=' Lett.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
377
+ page_content=' 117, 232408 (2020).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
378
+ page_content=' 19 X.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
379
+ page_content=' Zhao, Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
380
+ page_content=' Liu, D.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
381
+ page_content=' Zhu, M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
382
+ page_content=' Sall, X.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
383
+ page_content=' Zhang, H.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
384
+ page_content=' Ma, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
385
+ page_content=' Langer, B.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
386
+ page_content=' Ocker, S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
387
+ page_content=' Jaiswal, G.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
388
+ page_content=' Jakob, M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
389
+ page_content=' Kläui, W.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
390
+ page_content=' Zhao, and D.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
391
+ page_content=' Ravelosona, Appl.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
392
+ page_content=' Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
393
+ page_content=' Lett.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
394
+ page_content=' 116, 242401 (2020).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
395
+ page_content=' 20 M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
396
+ page_content=' Yang, Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
397
+ page_content=' Li, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
398
+ page_content=' Luo, Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
399
+ page_content=' Deng, N.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
400
+ page_content=' Zhang, X.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
401
+ page_content=' Zhang, S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
402
+ page_content=' Li, Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
403
+ page_content=' Cui, P.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
404
+ page_content=' Yu, T.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
405
+ page_content=' Yang, Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
406
+ page_content=' Sheng, S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
407
+ page_content=' Wang, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
408
+ page_content=' Xu, C.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
409
+ page_content=' Zhao, and K.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
410
+ page_content=' Wang, Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
411
+ page_content=' Rev.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
412
+ page_content=' Appl.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
413
+ page_content=' 15, 054013 (2021).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
414
+ page_content=' 21 S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
415
+ page_content=' Zhang, Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
416
+ page_content=' Su, X.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
417
+ page_content=' Li, R.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
418
+ page_content=' Li, W.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
419
+ page_content=' Tian, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
420
+ page_content=' Hong, and L.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
421
+ page_content=' You, Appl.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
422
+ page_content=' Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
423
+ page_content=' Lett.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
424
+ page_content=' 114, 042401 (2019).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
425
+ page_content=' 22 J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
426
+ page_content=' Lourembam, L.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
427
+ page_content=' Huang, B.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
428
+ page_content=' Chen, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
429
+ page_content=' Qiu, H.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
430
+ page_content='J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
431
+ page_content=' Chung, S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
432
+ page_content='L.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
433
+ page_content='K.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
434
+ page_content=' Yap, Q.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
435
+ page_content='J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
436
+ page_content=' Yap, S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
437
+ page_content='K.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
438
+ page_content=' Wong, and S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
439
+ page_content='T.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
440
+ page_content=' Lim, Advanced Electronic Materials 7, 2001133 (2021).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
441
+ page_content=' 7 23 S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
442
+ page_content=' Das, A.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
443
+ page_content=' Zaig, H.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
444
+ page_content=' Nhalil, L.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
445
+ page_content=' Avraham, M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
446
+ page_content=' Schultz, and L.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
447
+ page_content=' Klein, Scientific Reports 9, 20368 (2019).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
448
+ page_content=' 24 R.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
449
+ page_content=' Law, R.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
450
+ page_content=' Sbiaa, T.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
451
+ page_content=' Liew, and T.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
452
+ page_content='C.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
453
+ page_content=' Chong, Appl.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
454
+ page_content=' Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
455
+ page_content=' Lett.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
456
+ page_content=' 91, 242504 (2007).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
457
+ page_content=' 25 T.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
458
+ page_content=' Devolder, C.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
459
+ page_content=' Chappert, Y.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
460
+ page_content=' Chen, E.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
461
+ page_content=' Cambril, H.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
462
+ page_content=' Bernas, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
463
+ page_content='P.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
464
+ page_content=' Jamet, and J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
465
+ page_content=' Ferré, Appl.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
466
+ page_content=' Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
467
+ page_content=' Lett.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
468
+ page_content=' 74, 3383 (1999).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
469
+ page_content=' 26 J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
470
+ page_content='H.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
471
+ page_content=' Franken, M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
472
+ page_content=' Hoeijmakers, R.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
473
+ page_content=' Lavrijsen, J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
474
+ page_content='T.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
475
+ page_content=' Kohlhepp, H.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
476
+ page_content='J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
477
+ page_content='M.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
478
+ page_content=' Swagten, B.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
479
+ page_content=' Koopmans, E.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
480
+ page_content=' van Veldhoven, and D.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
481
+ page_content='J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
482
+ page_content=' Maas, Journal of Applied Physics 109, 07D504 (2011).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/CdE0T4oBgHgl3EQfQADn/content/2301.02188v1.pdf'}
CtE0T4oBgHgl3EQfgQFr/content/tmp_files/2301.02415v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1457 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+ 1
3
+ Photochemical and RadiatiOn Transport model for Extensive USe
4
+ (PROTEUS)
5
+
6
+ Yuki Nakamura1,2, Naoki Terada1, Shungo Koyama1, Tatsuya Yoshida1, Hiroki Karyu1, Kaori
7
+ Terada1, Takeshi Kuroda1, Arihiro Kamada1, Isao Murata1, Shotaro Sakai1, Yuhei Suzuki1, Mirai
8
+ Kobayashi1, and François Leblanc2
9
+
10
+ 1 Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
11
+ 2 LATMOS, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
12
+
13
+ Corresponding author: Yuki Nakamura ([email protected])
14
+
15
+
16
+ Abstract
17
+ We introduce a new flexible one-dimensional photochemical model named Photochemical and
18
+ RadiatiOn Transport model for Extensive USe (PROTEUS), which consists of a Python graphical
19
+ user interface (GUI) program and Fortran 90 modules. PROTEUS is designed for adaptability to
20
+ many planetary atmospheres, for flexibility to deal with thousands of or more chemical reactions
21
+ with high efficiency, and for intuitive operation with GUI. Chemical reactions can be easily
22
+ implemented into the Python GUI program in a simple string format, and users can intuitively
23
+ select a planet and chemical reactions on GUI. Chemical reactions selected on GUI are
24
+ automatically analyzed by string parsing functions in the Python GUI program, then applied to
25
+ the Fortran 90 modules to simulate with the selected chemical reactions on a selected planet.
26
+ PROTEUS can significantly save the time for those who need to develop a new photochemical
27
+ model; users just need to write chemical reactions in the Python GUI program and just select them
28
+ on GUI to run a new photochemical model.
29
+
30
+ Keywords: Photochemical model, Graphical user interface, PROTEUS
31
+
32
+
33
+ Introduction
34
+ Photochemical models are essential for investigating the vertical chemical structure of planetary
35
+ atmospheres and their evolution throughout the history of the planets. They solve continuity-
36
+ transport equations considering production and loss of each atmospheric species by numerous
37
+ chemical reactions including photolysis. So far, plenty of photochemical models have been
38
+ developed for various planetary atmospheres (e.g., Kasting et al., 1979; Nair et al., 1994; Kim
39
+
40
+
41
+ 2
42
+ and Fox, 1994; Fox and Sung, 2001; Krasnopolsky, 2009; Krasnopolsky, 2012; Chaffin et al.,
43
+ 2017). As the mass and spectral resolutions of measurements for detecting chemical species in
44
+ planetary atmospheres increase and the theory of chemical kinetic systems become more complex,
45
+ the need for photochemical models with hundreds or thousands of chemical reactions increase.
46
+
47
+ There are roughly three approaches to develop a numerical code for solving a lot of chemical
48
+ reactions (Damian et al., 2002). The first approach is a hard-coding approach, in which the
49
+ developer analyzes the chemical reactions, derives all the production and loss rate terms for each
50
+ chemical species, and codes them into a program by hand. This approach is easy to develop when
51
+ the number of chemical reactions is smaller than a hundred, however, it takes a lot of time to
52
+ develop a code when the number of reactions becomes larger than hundreds or more. It is also
53
+ difficult to add new chemical reactions into an already hard-coded program.
54
+
55
+ The second approach is a totally integrated approach, in which the chemical reactions are listed
56
+ in a specific file in a certain format and they are parsed by a program and stored in a memory
57
+ when it is run. This approach is flexible in adding new chemical reactions after the development
58
+ of the core program, and easy to deal with hundreds of chemical reactions without developer’s
59
+ manual derivation. This approach was used in the Atmos model in Fortran language for instance,
60
+ which was originally developed by Kasting et al. (1979), updated by Zahnle et al. (2006) and
61
+ recently described in Arney et al. (2016). Recently an integrated Martian photochemical model
62
+ was developed by Chaffin et al. (2017) in Julia language with a more flexible way of describing
63
+ reactions and rate coefficients.
64
+
65
+ The third approach is a preprocessing approach, in which the chemical reactions are listed in a
66
+ specific file like the totally integrated approach, but are parsed by a preprocessor to generate a
67
+ hard-coded program in a high-level language such as Fortran or C language (Damian et al., 2002).
68
+ This approach is also flexible in implementing hundreds of chemical reactions and is as efficient
69
+ as the hard-coding approach. This approach was used in the kinetic preprocessor (KPP) originally
70
+ developed by Damian et al. (2002), which has been widely used for chemical kinetic models for
71
+ Earth’s atmosphere.
72
+
73
+ In this paper, we present a new integrated photochemical model named Photochemical and
74
+ RadiatiOn Transport model for Extensive USe (PROTEUS), with a totally integrated approach.
75
+ PROTEUS couples Python and Fortran modules, which is designed for adaptability to many
76
+ planetary atmospheres, for flexibility to deal with thousands of or more chemical reactions with
77
+ high efficiency, and for intuitive operation with a graphical user interface (GUI). A Python GUI
78
+
79
+
80
+ 3
81
+ program integrates a list of chemical reactions, GUI functions controlling the behavior of GUI
82
+ operation, and a string parsing functions analyzing chemical reactions that output a Fortran 90
83
+ module. Fortran 90 modules solve differential equations numerically. Chemical reactions are
84
+ written in a simple and flexible string format in the Python GUI program, making it easy to add
85
+ new chemical reactions into the Python GUI program. The feature of PROTEUS that the Python
86
+ GUI program outputs a Fortran 90 module is similar to the preprocessing approach, leading to a
87
+ high efficiency, however, the Fortran modules in PROTEUS are not hard-coded but is rather
88
+ generic.
89
+
90
+ PROTEUS has been newly developed and independent of other photochemical models or KPPs
91
+ that have been developed so far.
92
+
93
+
94
+ Model description
95
+ Equations
96
+ PROTEUS is a one-dimensional photochemical model that solves a system of continuity
97
+ equations for each species as follows:
98
+
99
+ 𝜕𝑛!
100
+ 𝜕𝑡 = 𝑃! − 𝐿! − 𝜕Φ!
101
+ 𝜕𝑧 , (1)
102
+
103
+ where 𝑛! is the number density of 𝑖th species, 𝑃! is the production rate of 𝑖th species, 𝐿! is
104
+ the loss rate of 𝑖th species, 𝑧 is the altitude and Φ! is the vertical flux of 𝑖th species. The
105
+ vertical flux Φ! for both neutral and ionized species can be expressed as follows:
106
+
107
+ Φ! = −𝑛!𝐷! 1 1
108
+ 𝑛!
109
+ 𝜕𝑛!
110
+ 𝜕𝑧 + 1
111
+ 𝐻!
112
+ + 𝑞!
113
+ 𝑞"
114
+ 𝑇"/𝑇!
115
+ 𝑃"
116
+ 𝜕𝑃"
117
+ 𝜕𝑧 + 1 + 𝛼!
118
+ 𝑇!
119
+ 𝜕𝑇!
120
+ 𝜕𝑧 8 − 𝑛!𝐾 1 1
121
+ 𝑛!
122
+ 𝑑𝑛!
123
+ 𝑑𝑧 + 1
124
+ 𝐻 + 1
125
+ 𝑇
126
+ 𝑑𝑇
127
+ 𝑑𝑧8, (2)
128
+
129
+ where 𝐷! is the binary diffusion coefficient between 𝑖th species and the background atmosphere,
130
+ 𝐻!=𝑘#𝑇!/𝑚!𝑔 is the scale height of 𝑖th species, 𝑚! is the mass of 𝑖th species, 𝑘# is the
131
+ Boltzmann constant, 𝑔 is the gravitational acceleration, 𝑞! is the charge of 𝑖th species, 𝑞" is
132
+ the elementary charge, 𝑇" and 𝑇! are the temperatures of electrons and 𝑖th species, respectively,
133
+ 𝑃" =𝑛"𝑘#𝑇" is the electron pressure, 𝑛" is the electron number density, 𝛼! is the thermal
134
+ diffusion coefficient, 𝐾 is the eddy diffusion coefficient, 𝐻 =𝑘#𝑇/𝑚𝑔 is the mean scale height
135
+ of the background atmosphere, 𝑚 is the mean molecular mass of the atmosphere, and 𝑇 is the
136
+ neutral temperature. The temperature profiles are assumed to be stationary in time. The third term
137
+
138
+
139
+ 4
140
+ in Equation (2) is the ambipolar diffusion term, which is applied only to charged species. The
141
+ altitude-dependent gravitational acceleration 𝑔 is calculated by using the mass and radius of the
142
+ planet. The basic equations are stiff equations in which some of the variables such as number
143
+ densities of short-lived species change more quickly than others. Thus, PROTEUS applied an
144
+ implicit method solving the differential equations as follows:
145
+
146
+ 𝒙$%& = 𝒙$ + 1 𝐈
147
+ Δ𝑡 − 𝓙8
148
+ '𝟏
149
+ 𝑭(𝒙$) (3)
150
+
151
+ where 𝒙$ and 𝒙$%& are vector forms of the number density of chemical species at time step 𝑛
152
+ and 𝑛 + 1, respectively, 𝐈 is the unit matrix, Δ𝑡 is the timestep size, 𝑭(𝒙$) is the right-hand
153
+ side of equation (1) in the vector form, and 𝓙 is the sparse Jacobian matrix defined as follows:
154
+
155
+ 𝓙 ≡ 𝜕𝑭(𝒙$)
156
+ 𝜕𝒙$
157
+ =
158
+
159
+
160
+
161
+
162
+
163
+
164
+ 𝜕𝐹&
165
+ 𝜕𝑥&
166
+ 𝜕𝐹&
167
+ 𝜕𝑥)
168
+ 𝜕𝐹)
169
+ 𝜕𝑥&
170
+ 𝜕𝐹)
171
+ 𝜕𝑥)
172
+
173
+ 𝜕𝐹&
174
+ 𝜕𝑥*
175
+
176
+ 𝜕𝐹)
177
+ 𝜕𝑥*
178
+
179
+
180
+ 𝜕𝐹*
181
+ 𝜕𝑥&
182
+ 𝜕𝐹*
183
+ 𝜕𝑥)
184
+
185
+
186
+
187
+ 𝜕𝐹*
188
+ 𝜕𝑥*⎠
189
+
190
+
191
+
192
+
193
+
194
+ (4)
195
+
196
+ The time step size can gradually increase from an initial value 10-8 sec to ideally more than 1014
197
+ sec, allowing us to investigate from a sporadic event response in several minutes to the evolution
198
+ of planetary atmospheres in a billion-year time scale.
199
+
200
+ PROTEUS is basically a one-dimensional photochemical model and currently does not solve
201
+ horizontal transportation, but considers the rotation of a planet as options to obtain a simplified
202
+ global distribution. PROTEUS has four options for the simulation geometry: (1) one-dimensional
203
+ simulation at a given latitude at noon, (2) two-dimensional simulation at noon at each latitude
204
+ from the north pole to the south pole, (3) two-dimensional simulation at a given latitude with
205
+ rotation, and (4) three-dimensional simulation at all latitudes with rotation. The three-dimensional
206
+ simulation has already been applied by Nakamura et al. (2022) for the Jovian ionosphere.
207
+
208
+ Radiative transfer
209
+ PROTEUS uses the solar EUV irradiance model for aeronomic calculations (EUVAC) (Richards
210
+ et al., 1994) for the reference irradiance spectrum of solar extreme ultraviolet (EUV) flux to
211
+ calculate the photoionization rates of atmospheric species. EUVAC model provides the solar EUV
212
+
213
+
214
+ 5
215
+ flux in 37 wavelength bins ranging from 5 nm to 105 nm. EUVAC model requires the input of
216
+ F10.7 value and its 81 days running average value. High resolution solar EUV reference flux
217
+ model such as the high-resolution version of EUVAC (HEUVAC) (Richards et al., 2006) and the
218
+ Flare Irradiance Spectral Model-Version 2 (FISM2) (Chamberlin et al., 2020) will be
219
+ implemented into PROTEUS in the future. For calculating the photodissociation rates of
220
+ atmospheric species, we used the reference irradiance spectrum of the solar flux in the wavelength
221
+ range 0.05-2499.5 nm taken from Woods et al. (2009). Adopting the solar flux taken from EUVAC
222
+ model and Woods et al. (2009), the radiative transfer is solved by considering the absorption of
223
+ the solar irradiation by atmospheric species. In PROTEUS, users can flexibly change the
224
+ wavelength bin size for the solar irradiance of Woods et al. (2009) and absorption/dissociation
225
+ cross sections of chemical species at each wavelength. The solar flux and cross section data can
226
+ be provided in any wavelength bins, which are automatically interpolated and binned to the
227
+ wavelength bin given by the user. The automatically binning algorithm is especially useful when
228
+ users need high resolution wavelength bins in a limited wavelength range. For example, if users
229
+ need to resolve the Schumann-Runge bands of the oxygen molecule, the user can set a 0.01 nm
230
+ resolution at 176-192.6 nm and 1 nm at other wavelength range, which could reduce the
231
+ computational cost in solving radiation transfer and dissociation rate of atmospheric species even
232
+ fully resolving the structured Schumann-Runge bands of the oxygen molecule. This algorithm is
233
+ also useful for resolving a slight difference in absorption cross sections between isotopes (Yoshida,
234
+ et al., 2022 submitted).
235
+
236
+ The reference solar irradiance spectra are then divided by the square of the distance 𝑟 in the unit
237
+ AU between the planet and the Sun. The distance 𝑟 between the planet and the Sun at a given
238
+ solar longitude 𝐿+ is given by
239
+
240
+ 𝑟 = 𝑟,
241
+ 1 − 𝑒)
242
+ 1 + 𝑒 cosX𝐿+ − 𝐿+,.Y (5)
243
+
244
+ where 𝑟, is the mean distance in unit AU between the planet and the Sun, 𝑒 is the eccentricity
245
+ of the planetary orbit, and 𝐿+,. is the solar longitude at perihelion. The solar zenith angle at
246
+ latitude 𝜃 and an hour angle 𝜂 is given by
247
+
248
+ cos 𝜒 = sin 𝜃 sin 𝛿 + cos 𝜃 cos 𝛿 cos 𝜂 (6)
249
+
250
+ where 𝛿 is solar declination. 𝛿 and 𝜂 are given by
251
+
252
+
253
+
254
+ 6
255
+ sin 𝛿 = sin 𝜀 sin 𝐿+ (7)
256
+ 𝜂 = 2𝜋𝑡/
257
+ 𝑇0
258
+ (8)
259
+
260
+ where 𝜀 is the tilt angle of the rotational axis, 𝑡/ is the time in second measured from the local
261
+ noon, and 𝑇0 is the rotational period of the planet.
262
+
263
+ The absorption, ionization, and dissociation cross sections implemented into PROTEUS are
264
+ described in the following sections and Appendix. The Rayleigh scattering cross section 𝜎1 is
265
+ given by (Liou, 2002):
266
+ 𝜎1 = 128𝜋2
267
+ 3𝜆3
268
+ 𝛼0) (9)
269
+
270
+ where 𝜆 and 𝛼0 are the wavelength in nm and polarizability in nm3 of gaseous species,
271
+ respectively. The polarizability 𝛼0 of gaseous species are taken from the Computational
272
+ Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark DataBase (https://cccbdb.nist.gov).
273
+
274
+
275
+ Structure of PROTEUS
276
+ PROTEUS consists of a Python GUI program and of Fortran 90 modules. The Python GUI
277
+ program contains a list of chemical reactions for each planet, string parsing functions that parse
278
+ the reactions and reaction rate coefficients selected in GUI, and GUI functions that control the
279
+ behavior of GUI. Python language was adopted because of its flexibility in parsing strings and its
280
+ capability in operating GUI. Since Python language is not efficient for numerical calculation,
281
+ Fortran language was adopted to solve differential equations numerically. The structure of
282
+ PROTEUS is illustrated in Figure 1. Chemical reactions listed in the Python file are first read by
283
+ GUI functions (arrow 1 in Figure 1). Then, users select reactions on GUI (arrows 2 in Figure 1),
284
+ which will be analyzed by string parsing functions (arrow 3 in Figure 1) to output a Fortran 90
285
+ module named “v__in.f90” and data files (in directories “PLJ_list” and “settings”) including
286
+ information of the selected chemical reactions (arrow 4 in Figure 1). The Fortran 90 module
287
+ “v__in.f90” is the only module that includes information of chemical reactions, and other Fortran
288
+ 90 modules are independent of chemical reactions to be used in the simulation. Datafiles of initial
289
+ density profiles and temperature profiles are read by “v__in.f90” (arrow 5 in Figure 1). The
290
+ selected reactions, settings such as temperature profile and initial density profiles are applied to
291
+ the Fortran 90 model when the main Fortran 90 routine “e__main.f90” call subroutines in
292
+ “v__in.f90” (arrow 6 in Figure 1). Users can then run the Fortran model by compiling all the
293
+ Fortran 90 modules (indicated as “7” in Figure 1).
294
+
295
+
296
+ 7
297
+
298
+
299
+
300
+ Figure 1 Schematic illustration of the structure of PROTEUS.
301
+
302
+
303
+ The structure of the Fortran codes is illustrated in Figure 2. It should be noted that each Fortran
304
+ 90 file contains several modules with distinct functions, but only the Fortran 90 file is indicated
305
+ for simplicity. The main routine “e__main.f90” consists of three parts, (1) initialization, (2)
306
+ calculation, and (3) finalization. The description of each parts and each Fortran 90 files are as
307
+ follows.
308
+
309
+ (1) All variables are defined in “v__tdec.f90”. Information of the chemical reactions, boundary
310
+ conditions, and calculation settings are defined in “v__in.f90”. Physical constants and parameters
311
+ of the planetary orbit are given in “c__prm.f90”. Production rates calculated by other models (e.g.,
312
+ ionization rate calculated by a meteoroid model (Nakamura et al., 2022)) can be input in
313
+ “p__Mars.f90” and “p__Jupiter.f90”. The solar EUV flux is calculated by the EUVAC model and
314
+ the absorption and ionization cross sections are defined in “p__EUVAC.f90”. The solar flux of
315
+ Woods et al. (2009) is defined and absorption and dissociation cross sections are calculated
316
+ in ”p__UV.f90”.
317
+
318
+ Python GUI program
319
+ Chemical reaction list
320
+ String parsing functions
321
+ GUI functions
322
+ Generic Fortran 90 modules
323
+ (independent of reactions)
324
+ v__in.f90 PLJ_list settings
325
+ Reaction analysis information
326
+ 1
327
+ 3
328
+ 4
329
+ e__main.f90
330
+ subroutines
331
+ Analyze selected reactions
332
+ Display chemical reactions
333
+ 6
334
+ 7 Compile F90 modules and run the model
335
+ Input files
336
+ Initial
337
+ density
338
+ Tempera-
339
+ ture
340
+ 5
341
+ Select reactions on GUI
342
+ 2
343
+
344
+
345
+ 8
346
+ (2)
347
+ The
348
+ radiative
349
+ transfer
350
+ is
351
+ solved
352
+ and
353
+ the
354
+ optical
355
+ depth
356
+ is
357
+ calculated
358
+ in
359
+ “p__photochem_opticaldepth.f90”. Ionization and dissociation rates, reaction rate coefficients
360
+ and production and loss rates of each species are calculated in “p__photochem_rate.f90”. The
361
+ vertical diffusion flux is calculated in “p__photochem_transport.f90”. The eddy and binary
362
+ diffusion coefficients are defined in “p__eddy_diffusion.f90” and “p__molecular_diffusion.f90”,
363
+ respectively. “p__photochem_scheme.f90” calculates the Jacobian matrix and advances the
364
+ timestep using the implicit method.
365
+
366
+ (3) At last, “p__io.f90” outputs the calculated simulation results.
367
+
368
+
369
+
370
+ Figure 2 Schematic illustration of the structure of Fortran codes.
371
+
372
+
373
+ Graphical user interface
374
+ The Python GUI program uses the tkinter package, a standard library of Python to use the Tcl/Tk
375
+ GUI toolkit (https://docs.python.org/3/library/tkinter.html). The Python GUI allows users to
376
+ easily and intuitively select a planet, chemical reactions of interest, and run the simulation. An
377
+ example of GUI is shown in Figure 3, and the operation of GUI is as follows. Once the user runs
378
+ the Python GUI program, one can select a planet as indicated (“1” in the upper panel of Figure
379
+ 3). After selecting a planet, one can create a new project directory, or select or rename a project
380
+ directory that still exists as indicated (“2” in the upper panel of Figure 3). Then the chemical
381
+ e__main.f90
382
+ v_ _in.f90
383
+ Chemical reaction info
384
+ Boundary conditions
385
+ Calculation settings
386
+ c_ _prm.f90
387
+ Physical constants
388
+ Planetary orbit parameters
389
+ p_ _Mars.f90, p_ _Jupiter.f90
390
+ Special reactions for each planet
391
+ e.g.) Input production rates calculated by
392
+ other models
393
+ p_ _photochem_rate.f90
394
+ Calculating ionization & dissociation rates
395
+ Calculating reaction rate coefficients
396
+ Calculating production & loss rates
397
+ p_ _photochem_transport.f90
398
+ Calculating vertical diffusion flux
399
+ p_ _photochem_scheme.f90
400
+ Advancing time step using an implicit method
401
+ p_ _photochem_opticaldepth.f90
402
+ Solving radiative transfer
403
+ Calculating optical depth
404
+ p_ _molecular_diffusion.f90
405
+ Binary diffusion coefficient
406
+ (defined for each planet)
407
+ p_ _eddy_diffusion.f90
408
+ Eddy diffusion coefficient
409
+ (defined for each planet)
410
+ p_ _io.f90
411
+ Output results
412
+ v_ _tdec.f90
413
+ Declaration of variables
414
+ Initialization
415
+ Calculation
416
+ Finalization
417
+ p_ _EUVAC.f90
418
+ Solar EUV flux (EUVAC model)
419
+ Absorption & ionization cross sections
420
+ p_ _UV.f90
421
+ Solar flux of Woods et al. (2009)
422
+ Absorption & dissociation cross sections
423
+ e_ _: executable
424
+ v_ _: variables
425
+ c_ _: parameters
426
+ p_ _: packages
427
+
428
+
429
+ 9
430
+ reaction list for the selected planet appears in the window (the lower panel of Figure 3). Chemical
431
+ reactions and their rate coefficients written in the Python GUI program are automatically
432
+ converted into Unicode and displayed, making them easy to read. One can select or clear reactions
433
+ by clicking on the checkbox at each reaction (“3” in the lower panel of Figure 3). By inserting
434
+ chemical species, reference or label into a search box, only related reactions appear in the window.
435
+ One can set upper and lower boundary conditions, initial density profiles, vertical grid size, and
436
+ other calculation settings such as dimension of the simulation, season, latitude, integration time,
437
+ maximum time step size (“4” in the lower panel of Figure 3). After all the settings are done, one
438
+ can press “Output f90 module”, then the following files are generated in the selected project
439
+ directory: a Fortran 90 module named “v__in.f90”, setting files stored in the directory “settings”,
440
+ and information about production and loss reactions of each chemical species, rate coefficient
441
+ labels, and Jacobian matrix analyzed by the string parsing function stored in the directory
442
+ “PLJ_list”. The list of chemical species, the number of chemical species, indices, mass, and
443
+ charge of each chemical species are automatically determined and written in “v__in.f90” at this
444
+ time. Those text files are read by the Fortran 90 module “v__in.f90”. One can also output those
445
+ files, compile and run the Fortran codes by pressing “Output f90 module & Run model”, which
446
+ requires the installation of an open source software CMake into user’s computer (“5” in the lower
447
+ panel of Figure 3). All the settings and selected reactions are saved, and users can use the same
448
+ settings and selected reactions the next time they run GUI. At the end of the simulation, users can
449
+ quickly plot the density profiles by pressing “Plot setting” button (“6” in the lower panel of Figure
450
+ 3).
451
+
452
+
453
+
454
+ 10
455
+
456
+ Figure 3 Overview of GUI and instruction of the operation.
457
+
458
+
459
+ Format of chemical reaction list
460
+ The main feature of PROTEUS is the simple format of chemical reaction list in the Python GUI
461
+ program and on the GUI. Format of chemical reaction list in the Python GUI program and some
462
+ examples are illustrated in Figure 4.
463
+ 1. Select a planet
464
+ 2. Create / select / rename a project
465
+ 1
466
+ 2
467
+ 3. Select chemical reactions
468
+ 4. Set initial density profile data, boundary
469
+ conditions, vertical grid, and calculation settings
470
+ 5. Output F90 modules and run the model
471
+ 6. Plot density profiles after the simulation
472
+ 3
473
+ 5
474
+ 4
475
+ 6
476
+
477
+ Select Project
478
+ Mars
479
+ Select or Create Project
480
+ # If you want to create new directory, please enter the name of new project (directory) and press "Create New".
481
+ # If you want to load a directory and save as new project (directory),
482
+ please enter the name of new project (directory) name and press "Save as".
483
+ # Location of the project (directory) is: ./Mars/"project (directory) name"
484
+ Create New
485
+ Project (directory) list:
486
+ Select
487
+ Project_1
488
+ Save as
489
+ Select
490
+ Project_2
491
+ Save as!!
492
+ GUI for Photochemical model
493
+ Choose Planet
494
+ Help
495
+ Exit
496
+ Venus
497
+ Earth
498
+ Mars
499
+ Jupiter..
500
+ GUI for Photochemical model
501
+ Mars I Curent project: ./Mars/Project1
502
+ Version: 1.01
503
+ Search reaction
504
+ Set input species
505
+ Set z Grid
506
+ [Help
507
+ [Exit
508
+ Update list
509
+ Boundary Condition
510
+ Calculation settings
511
+ Plot setting
512
+ Chemical Reactions
513
+ Rates
514
+ Label
515
+ Reference
516
+ 0+0D
517
+ CO2 + O+(4S)
518
+ 9.60 × 10-11
519
+ R1b in Fox and Sung [20011
520
+ Fehsenfeld et al. [19701
521
+ CO2 + 02*
522
+ 5.50 × 10-11 × (300/Ti)0.82 for T = ~ 1500 [K)
523
+ 1.50 × 10-11 × (1500/Ti)-0,75 for T = 1500 ~ [K]
524
+ R2 in Fox and Sung [20011
525
+ Anicich [1993a].Ferguson et
526
+ CO2* + NO
527
+
528
+ NO+ + CO2
529
+ 1.23 × 10-10
530
+ R3 in Fox and Sung [20011
531
+ Anicich [1993a]
532
+ CO2* + N
533
+
534
+ NO + CO+
535
+ 3.40 × 10-10
536
+ R4 in Fox and Sung [20011
537
+ Scott et al. [19981
538
+ CO2* + N(2D)
539
+ N* + CO2
540
+ 2.00 × 10-10
541
+ R5 in Fox and Sung [2001]
542
+ estimated, see Fox [1982al
543
+ H +O0
544
+
545
+ HCO2* + H
546
+ 8.70 × 10-10
547
+ R6 in Fox and Sung [20011
548
+ Scott et al. 119971
549
+ CO2* + H
550
+ HCO+ + O
551
+ 4.46 × 10-10
552
+ R7a in Fox and Sung [20011
553
+ Scott et al. 119971
554
+ CO2* + H
555
+
556
+ H+ + CO2
557
+ 2.35 × 10-11
558
+ R7b Fox and Sung [20011
559
+ Scott et al. [19971
560
+ CO* + 0
561
+ CO + O*(4S)
562
+ 1.40 × 10-10
563
+ R8inFoxand Sung[2001]
564
+ Fehsenfeld and Ferguson [19
565
+ CO* + NO
566
+
567
+ CO + NO+
568
+ 4.20 × 10-10
569
+ R9 in Fox and Sung [20011
570
+ Anicich [1993al
571
+ CO+ + 02
572
+ 00 +0
573
+ 1.50 × 10-10 × (300/Ti)1.1
574
+ R10 in Fox and Sung I20011
575
+ Anicich [1993al., Miller et al.
576
+ CO+ + CO2
577
+
578
+ CO2* + CO
579
+ 1.10 × 10-9
580
+ R11 in Fox and Sung /20011
581
+ Anicich [1993al
582
+ H ++00
583
+ HCO+ + H
584
+ 7.50 × 10-10
585
+ R12a in Fox and Sung [20011
586
+ Scott et al. [19971
587
+ CO* + H
588
+ H+ + CO
589
+ 4.00 × 10-10
590
+ R13 in Fox and Sung /20011
591
+ Scott et al. [19971
592
+ CO+ + N
593
+
594
+ NO+ + C
595
+ 8.20 × 10-11
596
+ R14 in Fox and Sung [20011
597
+ Scott et al. [19981
598
+ O2+ + N
599
+
600
+ NO+ + O
601
+ 1.00 × 10-10
602
+ R15 in Fox and Sung [20011
603
+ Scott et al. 119981
604
+ O2+ + N(2D)
605
+
606
+ NO+ + O
607
+ 1.80 × 10-10
608
+ R16a in Fox and Sung [20011
609
+ Goldan et al. 119661
610
+ O2+ + N(°D)
611
+
612
+ ZO + +N
613
+ 8.65 × 10-11
614
+ R16b in Fox and Sung [20011
615
+ reverse of (R31b) O'Keefe et
616
+ 02* + NO
617
+
618
+ ZO + +ON
619
+ 4.50 × 10-10
620
+ R17 in Fox and Sung 120011
621
+ Midey and Viggiano [19991
622
+ All Select
623
+ All Clear
624
+ Undo
625
+ [Redo]
626
+ [Reaction Analysis
627
+ Output f90 module
628
+ Outputf90 module
629
+ & Run model
630
+ 11
631
+
632
+
633
+ Figure 4 Format of the chemical reaction list in the Python GUI program.
634
+
635
+ Any reactions and their rate coefficients are described in the following string format in the Python
636
+ GUI program. Reaction and rate coefficient are separated by a colon “:”, and left- and right-hand
637
+ side of the reaction are separated by an arrow “->”. Chemical species can be written simply as
638
+ string. For instance, ionized species “N2+”, “CO2+”, and “H+(H2O)4” are simply described as
639
+ “N2+”, “CO2+”, and “H+(H2O)4”, respectively, and electron is described as “e-”. Isotope
640
+ species such as “13CO2” can be written as “^13CO2”. Each chemical species and an addition
641
+ operator “+” or an arrow “->” should be separated by at least one space. PROTEUS also deals
642
+ with three-body reactions with the expression “M” describing the total atmospheric number
643
+ density. Temperature-dependent rate coefficient equation can be simply described as string in
644
+ infix notation. Addition operator “+”, subtraction operator “-”, multiplication operator “*”,
645
+ division operator “/”, exponentiation operator “^” or “**”, exponential function “exp()” square
646
+ root function ”sqrt()”, neutral, ion and electron temperatures “Tn”, “Ti”, and “Te”, respectively,
647
+ altitude in km “h”, decimal fraction values such as “1.16”, integer values such as “300”, and
648
+ values in E notation such as “4.9e-11” can be used in the rate coefficient equation. If there is a
649
+ temperature range T1-T2 [K] in which the rate coefficient is valid, one can describe the
650
+ temperature range by “for T = T1 ~ T2 [K]”.
651
+
652
+ Reactions and their rate coefficients selected on GUI are parsed by the string parsing functions in
653
+ the Python GUI program. Index for each chemical species is automatically determined by the
654
+ string parsing function, and mass and charge of each chemical species are also automatically
655
+ identified by the string parsing function. String of each species are automatically divided into
656
+ constituent elements and mass is calculated by the sum of mass of all the elements, and charge is
657
+ Examples of chemical reaction list in Python code
658
+ # Basic format
659
+ reaction_rate_list.append(" Reactants -> Products : Rate coefficient for T = T1 ~ T2 [K] @ Reference # Label ")
660
+ # Photo-ionization and dissociation reactions
661
+ reaction_rate_list.append(" CO2 + hv -> CO2+ + e- : Photoionization ")
662
+ reaction_rate_list.append(" CO2 + hv -> CO
663
+ + O : Photodissociation ")
664
+ # Normal two-body reactions
665
+ reaction_rate_list.append(" O(1D) + N2O -> N2
666
+ + O2 : 4.9e-11
667
+ # R75 in Nair et al. [1994] ")
668
+ reaction_rate_list.append(" NO + O3 -> NO2 + O2 : 2.0e-12 * exp(-1400/Tn) # R76 in Nair et al. [1994] ")
669
+ # Reaction with several expression of rate coefficient at different temperature ranges
670
+ reaction_rate_list.append(" N2+ + O2 -> N2 + O2+ : 5.10e-11 * (300/Ti)^1.16 for T = ~ 1000 [K]
671
+ && ∖
672
+ 1.26e-11 * (1000/Ti)^(-0.67) for T = 1000 ~ 2000 [K] && ∖
673
+ 2.39e-11
674
+ for T = 2000 ~ [K] @ Scott et al. [1999], Dotan et al. [1997] # R23 in Fox and Sung [2001] ")
675
+ # Pressure-dependent three-body reaction
676
+ reaction_rate_list.append(" H + O2 + M -> HO2 + M : k0 = 8.8e-32 * (300/Tn)^1.3 && ∖
677
+ kinf = 7.5e-11 * (300/Tn)^(-0.2) # Chaffin et al. [2017] ")
678
+ # Reaction with unusual rate coefficient equation
679
+ reaction_rate_list.append(" N2+ + N2 + M -> N4+ + M : 6.8e-29 * (300/Tn)^2.23 * (1-0.00824*(300/Tn)^0.89) @ Troe [2005] # R31 in Pavlov [2014] ")
680
+ # Cluster ion reactions
681
+ reaction_rate_list.append(" H+(H2O)4 + H2O + M -> H+(H2O)5 + M
682
+ : 4.6e-28 * (300/Tn)^14 # R41 in Verronen et al. [2016] ")
683
+ reaction_rate_list.append(" H+(H2O)4 + CO3-(H2O)2 -> H + 6H2O + O + CO2 : 6.0e-8 * (300/Tn)^0.5 # R9 in Verronen et al. [2016] ")
684
+ hv
685
+ M
686
+ e-
687
+ Tn
688
+ Ti
689
+ Te
690
+ K0
691
+ kinf
692
+ : Photon
693
+ : Total atmospheric number density
694
+ : Electron
695
+ : Neutral temperature
696
+ : Ion temperature
697
+ : Electron temperature
698
+ : Low-pressure-limit rate coefficient
699
+ : High-pressure-limit rate coefficient
700
+ Reaction rates are calculated by using
701
+ local photon flux and cross sections
702
+
703
+
704
+ 12
705
+ calculated by counting the number of “+” and “-” in the string of each species. The string parsing
706
+ function analyzes which reaction produces or lose each chemical species. The rate coefficient
707
+ expressions written in infix notation are first separated into tokens. Then the order of tokens in
708
+ infix notation are converted into reverse Polish notation (i.e., postfix notation) and automatically
709
+ labeled. The Fortran 90 modules calculates the reaction rate coefficient using the labeled tokens
710
+ arranged in reverse Polish notation. This method allows PROTEUS to process a variety of
711
+ expression of temperature- and altitude-dependent rate coefficients (as seen in Figure 4) at high
712
+ computational speed. All the information needed to calculate production rate, loss rate and
713
+ Jacobian matrix are output as text files, which will be read by Fortran 90 module to apply the
714
+ information about chemical reactions selected. The number of chemical species and reactions,
715
+ mass and charge of chemical species, rate coefficient of each reaction and contribution of each
716
+ reaction to production/loss of each species are automatically applied to Fortran 90 modules by
717
+ reading those text files. Those features make PROTEUS a flexible photochemical model that can
718
+ be applied to many planetary atmospheres with different set of chemical reactions.
719
+
720
+
721
+ Application to planetary atmospheres
722
+ Mars
723
+ For the application to the Martian atmosphere, parameters of Mars and its orbit are implemented
724
+ into PROTEUS; The mean distance between Mars and the sun is 𝑟,=1.524 AU, the eccentricity
725
+ is 𝑒= 0.0934, the solar longitude at perihelion is 𝐿+,.=250°, tilt angle of the rotational axis is
726
+ 𝜀=25.2°, the rotational period is 𝑇0=88775 sec, the mass of Mars is 6.417×1023 kg, and the mean
727
+ radius of Mars is 3389.5 km (Patel et al., 2002; Williams, 2021).
728
+
729
+ The cross sections implemented into PROTEUS for the application to Mars are as follows.
730
+ Ionization cross sections of CO2, CO, O2, N2, and O are taken from Schunk and Nagy (2009).
731
+ Absorption cross sections and quantum yields for calculating dissociation rates of atmospheric
732
+ molecules are listed in Table A.1. In order to validate PROTEUS, we compared with one-
733
+ dimensional Martian photochemical model by Chaffin et al. (2017) (hereafter called as C17
734
+ model), using the same chemical reactions and their rate coefficients, boundary conditions,
735
+ temperature and water vapor profiles, and binary and eddy diffusion coefficient profiles. The
736
+ neutral density profiles simulated by PROTEUS and C17 model are shown in Figure 5.
737
+ PROTEUS and C17 model are in good agreement except for small differences for O3, OH, HO2
738
+ and H2O2. Those differences could be due to the difference in the photo-absorption and
739
+ dissociation cross sections used in the two models.
740
+
741
+
742
+
743
+ 13
744
+
745
+
746
+ Figure 5 Vertical profiles of neutral density simulated by PROTEUS (solid) and
747
+ one-dimensional Martian photochemical model by Chaffin et al. (2017)
748
+ (dashed). The same boundary conditions, chemical reactions and their rate
749
+ coefficient, binary and eddy diffusion coefficients, and temperature profile,
750
+ were used in both simulations for validation.
751
+
752
+
753
+ Jupiter
754
+ For the application to the Jovian atmosphere, parameters of Jupiter and its orbit are implemented
755
+ into PROTEUS; The mean distance between Jupiter and the sun is 𝑟,=5.2 AU, the eccentricity
756
+ 𝑒, the solar longitude at perihelion 𝐿+,., and tilt angle of the rotational axis 𝜀 are set to zero for
757
+ simplicity, the rotational period is assumed to be the System III period related to the period of
758
+ radio burst 𝑇0= 35729.71 sec, the mass of Jupiter is 1.898×1027 kg, and the equatorial radius of
759
+ Jupiter is 71492 km (Williams, 2021; Russell et al., 2001).
760
+
761
+ Ionization cross sections of hydrogen molecule and atom, helium atom, hydrocarbon molecules
762
+ (CH4, C2H2, C2H4, and C2H6) and metallic atoms (Fe, Mg, Si, and Na) implemented into
763
+ PROTEUS for the application to the Jovian ionosphere are found in Appendix of Nakamura et al.
764
+ (2022) and references therein.
765
+
766
+ PROTEUS has recently been applied to the Jovian ionosphere by Nakamura et al. (2022).
767
+ Chemical reactions regarding hydrocarbon ion chemistry used in the simulation are described in
768
+ 0
769
+ 50
770
+ 100
771
+ 150
772
+ 200
773
+ 100
774
+ 102
775
+ 104
776
+ 106
777
+ 108 1010 1012 1014 1016 1018
778
+ Altitude [km]
779
+ Density [cm-3]
780
+ CO2
781
+ CO
782
+ O2
783
+ O3
784
+ O
785
+ O(1D)
786
+ H2O
787
+ OH
788
+ HO2
789
+ H2O2
790
+ H2
791
+ H
792
+
793
+
794
+ 14
795
+ Nakamura et al. (2022). Ion density profiles calculated by PROTEUS with 218 reactions are
796
+ shown in Figure 6. Simulated ion density profiles are in good agreement with Kim and Fox (1994),
797
+ as discussed in Nakamura et al. (2022). Slight differences seen in the shape of profiles of
798
+ hydrocarbon ions could result from the difference in the initial density profiles of hydrocarbon
799
+ molecules, which are not indicated in Kim and Fox (1994).
800
+
801
+
802
+
803
+ Figure 6 Ion density profiles of the Jovian ionosphere simulated by PROTEUS.
804
+ Profiles are the same as Figure 3(a) in Nakamura et al. (2022) that used
805
+ PROTEUS.
806
+
807
+ Summary
808
+ We have newly developed a flexible one-dimensional photochemical model named PROTEUS,
809
+ which consists of a Python GUI program and of Fortran 90 modules. Chemical reactions can be
810
+ easily implemented into Python code as a simple string format, and users can intuitively select a
811
+ planet and chemical reactions to be considered in their calculation on GUI. Chemical reactions
812
+ selected on GUI are automatically analyzed by a string parsing code written in Python, which will
813
+ be applied to Fortran 90 modules to simulate with selected chemical reactions on a selected planet.
814
+ This paper presents examples of PROTEUS application to the Martian atmosphere and the Jovian
815
+ ionosphere, which are in good agreement with previous numerical models. PROTEUS can
816
+ significantly save time for those who need to develop a new photochemical model; they just need
817
+ to add chemical reactions in the Python code and just select them on GUI to run a new
818
+ photochemical model. PROTEUS can be easily extended to other planets and satellites, e.g.,
819
+ Venus, Earth, Titan, and exoplanets in the future.
820
+
821
+
822
+ 15
823
+
824
+
825
+ Appendix
826
+
827
+ Table A.1 List of cross sections and quantum yields implemented into
828
+ PROTEUS.
829
+
830
+ Species or reactions
831
+ Wavelength range
832
+ References
833
+ 𝜎!
834
+
835
+ 𝜙
836
+ 𝜎"
837
+ CO2 (absorption)
838
+
839
+ CO2 + hν → CO + O
840
+ CO2 + hν → CO + O(1D)
841
+ 0.1254-138.8869 nm
842
+ 138.8913 - 212.7660 nm
843
+ 138.8913 - 212.7660 nm
844
+ 0.1 - 138 nm
845
+ Huestis and Berkowitz (2011)a
846
+ Schmidt et al. (2013)
847
+ (Assumed to be 1.0)
848
+ Huebner and Mukherjee (2015)b
849
+ 𝜎!
850
+ 13CO2 (absorption)
851
+ 138.8913 - 212.7660nm
852
+ Schmidt et al. (2013)
853
+ 𝜎!
854
+
855
+
856
+
857
+
858
+
859
+
860
+
861
+ 𝜙
862
+ 𝜙
863
+ O2 (absorption)
864
+
865
+
866
+
867
+
868
+
869
+
870
+
871
+ O2 + hν → O + O
872
+ O2 + hν → O + O(1D)
873
+ 0.99 - 43.5 nm
874
+ 49.043646 - 103.066357 nm
875
+ 103.62 - 107.74 nm
876
+ 108.75 - 114.95 nm
877
+ 115 - 130.02 nm
878
+ 130.04 - 175.24 nm
879
+ 175.4 - 204 nm
880
+ 193 - 245 nm
881
+ 103 - 242 nm
882
+ 103 - 175 nm
883
+ Huffman (1969)a
884
+ Holland et al. (1993)a
885
+ Lee (1955)a
886
+ Ogawa and Ogawa (1975)a
887
+ Lu et al. (2010)a
888
+ Yoshino et al. (2005)a
889
+ Minschwaner et al. (1992)a
890
+ Yoshino et al. (1992)a
891
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
892
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
893
+ 𝜎!
894
+
895
+
896
+
897
+
898
+
899
+ 𝜙
900
+ 𝜙
901
+ H2O (absorption)
902
+
903
+
904
+
905
+
906
+
907
+ H2O + hν → H + OH
908
+ H2O + hν → H2 + O(1D)
909
+ 6.2 - 59.04 nm
910
+ 60.01 - 114.58 nm
911
+ 114.80 - 120.35 nm
912
+ 120.38 - 139.99 nm
913
+ 140.00 - 196.00 nm
914
+ 196.031 - 230.413 nm
915
+ 105 nm -
916
+ 105 - 145 nm
917
+ Chan et al. (1993)a
918
+ Gürtler et al. (1977)a
919
+ Mota et al. (2005)a
920
+ Yoshino et al. (1996, 1997)a
921
+ Chung et al. (2001)a
922
+ Ranjan et al. (2020)a
923
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
924
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
925
+ 𝜎!
926
+
927
+
928
+ 𝜙
929
+ 𝜙
930
+ O3 (absorption)
931
+
932
+
933
+ O3 + hν → O2 + O(1D)
934
+ O3 + hν → O2 + O
935
+ 0.06 - 210 nm
936
+ 213.330 - 1100 nm
937
+
938
+ 220 - 340 nm
939
+ 220 - 340 nm
940
+ Huebner and Mukherjee (2015)b
941
+ Gorshelev et al. (2014)
942
+ Serdyuchenko et al. (2014)
943
+ Matsumi et al. (2002)a
944
+ (Assumed to be 1 − 𝜙(O3→O(1D)))
945
+ 𝜎!
946
+ HO2 (absorption)
947
+ 190 - 260 nm
948
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
949
+
950
+
951
+ 16
952
+ 𝜙
953
+ HO2 + hν → OH + O
954
+ 190 - 260 nm
955
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
956
+ 𝜎!
957
+
958
+ 𝜙
959
+ 𝜙
960
+ H2O2 (absorption)
961
+
962
+ H2O2 + hν → HO2 + H
963
+ H2O2 + hν → OH + OH
964
+ 121.33 - 189.70 nm
965
+ 190.00 - 255.00 nm
966
+ 121 - 230 nm
967
+ 121 - 340 nm
968
+ Schürgers and Welge (1968)a
969
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
970
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
971
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
972
+ 𝜎!
973
+ 𝜎"
974
+ 𝜎"
975
+ OH (absorption)
976
+ OH + hν → H + O
977
+ OH + hν → H + O(1D)
978
+ 0.06 - 282.3 nm
979
+ 124.5 - 261.65 nm
980
+ 93 - 511.4 nm
981
+ Huebner and Mukherjee (2015)b
982
+ Huebner and Mukherjee (2015)b
983
+ Huebner and Mukherjee (2015)b
984
+ 𝜎!
985
+ 𝜎"
986
+ H2 (absorption)
987
+ H2 + hν → H + H
988
+ 0.1 - 110.86 nm
989
+ 84.48 - 110.86 nm
990
+ Huebner and Mukherjee (2015)b
991
+ Huebner and Mukherjee (2015)b
992
+ 𝜎!
993
+ 𝜎"
994
+ N2 (absorption)
995
+ N2 + hν → N + N
996
+ 0.1 - 103.8 nm
997
+ 51.96 - 103.8 nm
998
+ Huebner and Mukherjee (2015)b
999
+ Huebner and Mukherjee (2015)b
1000
+ 𝜎!
1001
+ 𝜎"
1002
+ NO (absorption)
1003
+ NO + hν → N + O
1004
+ 0.1 - 191 nm
1005
+ 0.1 - 191 nm
1006
+ Huebner and Mukherjee (2015)b
1007
+ Huebner and Mukherjee (2015)b
1008
+ 𝜎!
1009
+
1010
+ 𝜎"
1011
+ 𝜙
1012
+
1013
+ NO2 (absorption)
1014
+
1015
+ NO2 + hν → NO + O(1D)
1016
+ NO2 + hν → NO + O
1017
+ 0.06 - 238 nm
1018
+ 238.08219 - 666.57808 nm
1019
+ 108 - 243.88 nm
1020
+ 108 - 238 nm
1021
+ 239 - 300 nm
1022
+ 300 - 422 nm
1023
+ Huebner and Mukherjee (2015)b
1024
+ Vandaele et al. (1998)a
1025
+ Huebner and Mukherjee (2015)b
1026
+ Huebner and Mukherjee (2015)b
1027
+ (Assumed to be 1)
1028
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
1029
+ 𝜎!
1030
+ 𝜙
1031
+ 𝜙
1032
+ NO3 (absorption)
1033
+ NO3 + hν → NO2 + O
1034
+ NO3 + hν → NO + O2
1035
+ 400 - 691 nm
1036
+ 400 - 640 nm
1037
+ 586 - 640 nm
1038
+ Wayne et al. (1991)a
1039
+ Johnston et al. (1996)a
1040
+ Johnston et al. (1996)a
1041
+ 𝜎!
1042
+
1043
+
1044
+
1045
+
1046
+ 𝜙
1047
+ N2O (absorption)
1048
+
1049
+
1050
+
1051
+
1052
+ N2O + hν → N2 + O(1D)
1053
+ 16.8 - 59.0 nm
1054
+ 60.0 - 99.9 nm
1055
+ 108.20 - 122.18 nm
1056
+ 122.25 - 172.88 nm
1057
+ 173 - 210 nm
1058
+ 140 - 230 nm
1059
+ Hitchcock et al. (1980)a
1060
+ Cook et al. (1968)a
1061
+ Zelikoff et al. (1953)a
1062
+ Rabalais et al. (1971)a
1063
+ Selwyn et al. (1977)a
1064
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
1065
+ 𝜎!
1066
+
1067
+
1068
+ 𝜙
1069
+ 𝜙
1070
+ N2O5 (absorption)
1071
+
1072
+
1073
+ N2O5 + hν → NO3 + NO2
1074
+ N2O5 + hν → NO3 + NO + O
1075
+ 152 - 198 nm
1076
+ 200 - 260 nm
1077
+ 260 - 410 nm
1078
+ 248 - 410 nm
1079
+ 152 - 289 nm
1080
+ Osborne et al. (2000)a
1081
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
1082
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
1083
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
1084
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
1085
+ 𝜎!
1086
+ 𝜙
1087
+ HNO2 (absorption)
1088
+ HNO2 + hν → NO + OH
1089
+ 184 - 396 nm
1090
+ All
1091
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
1092
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
1093
+
1094
+
1095
+ 17
1096
+ 𝜎!
1097
+ 𝜙
1098
+ 𝜙
1099
+ 𝜙
1100
+ HNO3 (absorption)
1101
+ HNO3 + hν → HNO2 + O
1102
+ HNO3 + hν → HNO2 + O(1D)
1103
+ HNO3 + hν → OH + NO2
1104
+ 192 - 350 nm
1105
+ 193 - 260 nm
1106
+ 193 - 222 nm
1107
+ 193 - 350 nm
1108
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
1109
+ Estimatedc
1110
+ Estimatedc
1111
+ Estimatedc
1112
+ 𝜎!
1113
+
1114
+ 𝜙
1115
+ 𝜙
1116
+ HO2NO2 (absorption)
1117
+
1118
+ HO2NO2 + hν → HO2 + NO2
1119
+ HO2NO2 + hν → OH + NO3
1120
+ 190 - 280 nm
1121
+ 280 - 350 nm
1122
+ 190 - 350 nm
1123
+ 190 - 350 nm
1124
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
1125
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
1126
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
1127
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
1128
+ 𝜎!
1129
+ 𝜙
1130
+ 𝜙
1131
+ H2CO (absorption)
1132
+ H2CO + hν → H2 + CO
1133
+ H2CO + hν → H + HCO
1134
+ 224.56 - 376 nm
1135
+ 250 - 360 nm
1136
+ 250 - 360 nm
1137
+ Meller and Moortgat (2000)a
1138
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
1139
+ Burkholder et al. (2015)
1140
+
1141
+ 𝜎4: Absorption cross section, 𝜎5: dissociation cross section, 𝜙: quantum yield,
1142
+ a: data files are taken from The MPI-Mainz UV/VIS Spectral Atlas (Keller-
1143
+ Rudek et al., 2013), b: data files are taken from PHIDRATES (Huebner and
1144
+ Mukherjee, 2015), c: quantum yields for each photolysis reaction of HNO3 were
1145
+ estimated by quantum yield of each product (OH, O, and O(1D)) obtained by
1146
+ Johnston et al. (1974), Turnipseed et al. (1992), and Margitan and Watson
1147
+ (1982).
1148
+
1149
+
1150
+
1151
+
1152
+ Acknowledgements
1153
+
1154
+
1155
+ Reference
1156
+ Arney, G., Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Meadows, V. S., Wolf, E. T., Schwieterman, E., Charnay,
1157
+ B., Claire, M., Hébrard, E., and Trainer, M. G. (2016). The Pale Orange Dot: The Spectrum
1158
+ and
1159
+ Habitability
1160
+ of
1161
+ Hazy
1162
+ Archean
1163
+ Earth,
1164
+ Astrobiology,
1165
+ 16:11,
1166
+ 873-899
1167
+ doi:10.1089/ast.2015.1422.
1168
+
1169
+ Burkholder, J. B., Sander, S. P., Abbatt, J., Barker, J. R., Huie, R. E., Kolb, C. E., Kurylo, M. J.,
1170
+ Orkin, V. L., Wilmouth, D. M., and Wine, P. H. (2015). Chemical Kinetics and
1171
+ Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies, Evaluation No. 18, JPL Publication
1172
+ 15-10, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, http://jpldataeval.jpl.nasa.gov.
1173
+
1174
+
1175
+ 18
1176
+
1177
+ Chaffin, M. S., Deighan, J., Schneider, N. M., and Stewart, A. I. F. (2017). Elevated atmospheric
1178
+ escape of atomic hydrogen from Mars induced by high-altitude water, Nature Geoscience,
1179
+ 10, 174–178, doi:10.1038/ngeo2887.
1180
+
1181
+ Chan, W. F., Cooper, G., and Brion, C. E. (1993). The electronic spectrum of water in the discrete
1182
+ and continuum regions. Absolute optical oscillator strengths for photoabsorption (6-200 eV),
1183
+ Chem. Phys., 178, 387-401, doi:10.1016/0301-0104(93)85078-M.
1184
+
1185
+ Chamberlin, P. C., Eparvier, F. G., Knoer, V., Leise, H., Pankratz, A., Snow, M., et al. (2020). The
1186
+ flare irradiance spectral model-version 2 (FISM2), Space Weather, 18, e2020SW002588,
1187
+ doi:10.1029/2020SW002588
1188
+
1189
+ Chung, C.-Y., Chew, E. P., Cheng, B.-M., Bahou, M., and Lee, Y.-P. (2001). Temperature
1190
+ dependence of absorption cross-section of H2O, HDO, and D2O in the spectral region 140-
1191
+ 193 nm, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators,
1192
+ Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 467–468, Part 2, 1572-1576,
1193
+ doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00762-8.
1194
+
1195
+ Cook, G. R., Metzger, P. H., and Ogawa, M. (1968). Photoionization and absorption coefficients
1196
+ of N2O, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 58, 129-136, doi:10.1364/JOSA.58.000129.
1197
+
1198
+ Damian, V., Sandu, A., Damian, M., Potra, F., and Carmichael, G. R. (2002). The kinetic
1199
+ preprocessor KPP - a software environment for solving chemical kinetics, Computers &
1200
+ Chemical Engineering, 26, 11, 1567-1579, doi:10.1016/S0098-1354(02)00128-X.
1201
+
1202
+ Dotan, I., Hierl, P. M., Morris, R. A., and Viggiano, A. A. (1997). Rate constants for the reactions
1203
+ of N+ and N2+ with O2 as a function of temperature (300 - 1800 K), Int. J. Mass Spectrom.
1204
+ Ion Proc., 167/168, 223-230, doi:10.1016/S0168-1176(97)00077-3.
1205
+
1206
+ Fox, J. L., and Sung, K. Y. (2001). Solar activity variations of the Venus thermosphere/ionosphere,
1207
+ J. Geophys. Res., 106(A10), 21305-21335, doi:10.1029/2001JA000069.
1208
+
1209
+ Gorshelev, V., Serdyuchenko, A., Weber, M., Chehade, W., and Burrows, J. P., (2014). High
1210
+ spectral resolution ozone absorption cross-sections – Part 1: Measurements, data analysis
1211
+ and comparison with previous measurements around 293 K, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 609–624,
1212
+
1213
+
1214
+ 19
1215
+ 2014, doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-609-2014.
1216
+
1217
+ Gürtler, P., Saile, V., and Koch, E. E. (1977). Rydberg series in the absorption spectra of H2O and
1218
+ D2O in the vacuum ultraviolet, Chem. Phys. Lett., 51, 386-391, doi:10.1016/0009-
1219
+ 2614(77)80427-2.
1220
+
1221
+ Hitchcock, A. P., Brion, C. E., and van der Wiel, M. J. (1980). Absolute oscillator-strengths for
1222
+ valence-shell ionic photofragmentation of N2O and CO2 (8-75 eV), Chem. Phys., 45, 461-
1223
+ 478, doi:10.1016/0301-0104(80)87015-7.
1224
+
1225
+ Holland, D. M. P., Shaw, D. A., McSweeney, S. M., MacDonald, M. A., Hopkirk, A., Hayes, M.
1226
+ A. (1993). A study of the absolute photoabsorption, photoionization and photodissociation
1227
+ cross sections and the photoionization quantum efficiency of oxygen from the ionization
1228
+ threshold to 490 Å, Chemical Physics, 173, 2, 315-331, doi:10.1016/0301-0104(93)80148-
1229
+ 3.
1230
+
1231
+ Huebner, W.F., and Mukherjee, J. (2015). Photoionization and photodissociation rates in solar and
1232
+ blackbody
1233
+ radiation
1234
+ fields,
1235
+ Planetary
1236
+ and
1237
+ Space
1238
+ Science,
1239
+ 106,
1240
+ 11-45,
1241
+ doi:10.1016/j.pss.2014.11.022.
1242
+
1243
+ Huestis, D. L., and Berkowitz, J. (2011). Critical evaluation of the photoabsorption cross section
1244
+ of CO2 from 0.125 to 201.6 nm at room temperature, Advances in Geosciences, 229-242,
1245
+ doi:10.1142/9789814355377_0018.
1246
+
1247
+ Huffman, R. E. (1969). Absorption cross-sections of atmospheric gases for use in aeronomy,
1248
+ Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 47 (10), 1823-1834 doi:10.1139/v69-298
1249
+
1250
+ Johnston, H. S., Chang, S.-G., and Whitten, G. (1974). Photolysis of nitric acid vapor, J. Phys.
1251
+ Chem., 78, 1-7, doi:10.1021/j100594a001.
1252
+
1253
+ Johnston, H. S., Davis, H. F., and Lee, Y. T. (1996). NO3 photolysis product channels: Quantum
1254
+ yields
1255
+ from
1256
+ observed
1257
+ energy
1258
+ thresholds,
1259
+ J.
1260
+ Phys.
1261
+ Chem.,
1262
+ 100,
1263
+ 4713-4723,
1264
+ doi:10.1021/jp952692x.
1265
+
1266
+ Kasting, J. F., Liu, S. C., and Donahue, T. M. (1979). Oxygen levels in the prebiological
1267
+ atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 84(C6), 3097– 3107, doi:10.1029/JC084iC06p03097.
1268
+
1269
+
1270
+ 20
1271
+
1272
+ Keller-Rudek, H., Moortgat, G. K., Sander, R., and Sörensen, R. (2013). The MPI-Mainz UV/VIS
1273
+ spectral atlas of gaseous molecules of atmospheric interest, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 365–
1274
+ 373, doi:10.5194/essd-5-365-2013.
1275
+
1276
+ Kim, Y. H., and Fox, J. L. (1994). The chemistry of hydrocarbon ions in the Jovian ionosphere,
1277
+ Icarus, 112, 310–325, doi:10.1006/ icar.1994.1186.
1278
+
1279
+ Krasnopolsky, V. A., (2009). A photochemical model of Titan's atmosphere and ionosphere,
1280
+ Icarus, 201, 1, 226-256, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2008.12.038.
1281
+
1282
+ Krasnopolsky, V. A. (2012). A photochemical model for the Venus atmosphere at 47–112km,
1283
+ Icarus, 218, 1,230-246, doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2011.11.012.
1284
+
1285
+ Lee, P. (1955). Photodissociation and photoionization of oxygen (O2) as inferred from measured
1286
+ absorption coefficients, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 45, 703-709, doi:10.1364/JOSA.45.000703.
1287
+
1288
+ Liou, K. N. (2002). An introduction to atmospheric radiation (Vol. 84), Elsevier.
1289
+
1290
+ Lu, H.-C., Chen, K.-K., Chen, H.-F., Cheng, B.-M., and Ogilvie, J. F. (2010). Absorption cross
1291
+ section of molecular oxygen in the transition E3Σu-, v = 0 - X3Σg-, v = 0 at 38 K, Astronom.
1292
+ Astrophys., 520, A19, 1-4, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201013998.
1293
+
1294
+ Margitan, J. J., and Watson, R. T. (1982). Kinetics of the reaction of hydroxyl radicals with nitric
1295
+ acid, J. Phys. Chem., 1982, 86, 3819-3824, doi:10.1021/j100216a022.
1296
+
1297
+ Matsumi, Y., Comes, F. J., Hancock, G., Hofzumahaus, A., Hynes, A. J., Kawasaki, M., and
1298
+ Ravishankara, A. R. (2002). Quantum yields for production of O(1D) in the ultraviolet
1299
+ photolysis of ozone: Recommendation based on evaluation of laboratory data, J. Geophys.
1300
+ Res., 107(D3), ACH1-1 - ACH1-12, doi:10.1029/2001JD000510.
1301
+
1302
+ Meller, R., and Moortgat, G. K. (2000). Temperature dependence of the absorption cross sections
1303
+ of formaldehyde between 223 and 323 K in the wavelength range 225-375 nm, J. Geophys.
1304
+ Res., 105(D6), 7089-7101, doi:10.1029/1999JD901074.
1305
+
1306
+ Minschwaner, K., Anderson, G. P., Hall, L. A., and Yoshino, K. (1992). Polynomial coefficients
1307
+
1308
+
1309
+ 21
1310
+ for calculating O2 Schumann-Runge cross sections at 0.5 cm-1 resolution, J. Geophys. Res.,
1311
+ 97(D9), 10103–10108, doi:10.1029/92JD00661.
1312
+
1313
+ Mota, R., Parafita, R., Giuliani, A., Hubin-Franskin, M.-J., Lourenço, J. M. C., Garcia, G.,
1314
+ Hoffmann, S. V., Mason, M. J., Ribeiro, P. A., Raposo, M., and Limão-Vieira, P. (2005).
1315
+ Water VUV electronic state spectroscopy by synchrotron radiation, Chem. Phys. Lett., 416,
1316
+ 152-159, doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2005.09.073.
1317
+
1318
+ Nair, H., Allen, M., Anbar, A. D., Yung, Y. L., and Clancy, R. T., (1994). A Photochemical Model
1319
+ of the Martian Atmosphere, Icarus, 111, 1, 124-150, doi:/10.1006/icar.1994.1137.
1320
+
1321
+ Nakamura, Y., Terada, K., Tao, C., Terada, N., Kasaba, Y., Leblanc, F., et al. (2022). Effect of
1322
+ meteoric ions on ionospheric conductance at Jupiter. Journal of Geophysical Research:
1323
+ Space Physics, 127, e2022JA030312, doi:10.1029/2022JA030312.
1324
+
1325
+ Ogawa, S., and Ogawa, M. (1975). Absorption cross sections of O2(a1Δg) and O2(X3Σg-) in the
1326
+ region from 1087 to 1700 Å", Can. J. Phys., 53, 1845-1852, doi:10.1139/p75-236.
1327
+
1328
+ Osborne, B. A., Marston, G., Kaminski, L., Jones, N. C., Gingell, J. M., Mason, N., Walker, I. C.,
1329
+ Delwiche, J., and Hubin-Franskin, M.-J. (2000). Vacuum ultraviolet spectrum of dinitrogen
1330
+ pentoxide, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 64, 67-74doi:10.1016/S0022-
1331
+ 4073(99)00104-1.
1332
+
1333
+ Patel, M. R., Zarnecki, J. C., and Catling, D. C. (2002). Ultraviolet radiation on the surface of
1334
+ Mars and the Beagle 2 UV sensor, Planetary and Space Science, 50, 9, 915-927,
1335
+ doi:10.1016/S0032-0633(02)00067-3.
1336
+
1337
+ Pavlov, A. V. (2014). Photochemistry of Ions at D-region Altitudes of the Ionosphere: A Review,
1338
+ Surv. Geophys., 35:259–334, doi:10.1007/s10712-013-9253-z.
1339
+
1340
+ Rabalais, J. W., McDonald, J. M., Scherr, V., and McGlynn, S. P. (1971). Electronic spectroscopy
1341
+ of isoelectronic molecules. II. Linear triatomic groupings containing sixteen valence
1342
+ electrons, Chem. Rev., 71, 73-108, doi:10.1021/cr60269a004.
1343
+
1344
+ Ranjan, S., Schwieterman, E. W., Harman, C., Fateev, A., Sousa-Silva, C., Seager, S., and Hu, R.
1345
+ (2020). Photochemistry of anoxic abiotic habitable planet atmospheres: Impact of new H2O
1346
+
1347
+
1348
+ 22
1349
+ cross-sections, Astrophys. J., 896, 148, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9363.
1350
+
1351
+ Richards, P. G., Fennelly, J. A., and Torr, D. G. (1994). EUVAC: A solar EUV flux model for
1352
+ aeronomic calculations, J. Geophys. Res., 99(A5), 8981-8992, doi:10.1029/94JA00518.
1353
+ Richards, P. G., Woods, T. N., and Peterson, W. K. (2006). HEUVAC: A new high resolution solar
1354
+ EUV
1355
+ proxy
1356
+ model,
1357
+ Advances
1358
+ in
1359
+ Space
1360
+ Research,
1361
+ 37,
1362
+ 2,
1363
+ 315-322,
1364
+ doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.06.031.
1365
+
1366
+ Schunk, R. W., and Nagy, A. F. (2009). Ionospheres, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press.
1367
+
1368
+ Schürgers, M., and Welge, K. H. (1968). Absorptions koeffizient von H2O2 und N2H4 zwischen
1369
+ 1200 und 2000 Å, Z. Naturforsch., 23a, 1508-1510, doi:10.1515/zna-1968-1011.
1370
+
1371
+ Scott, G. B. I., Fairley, D. A., Milligan, D. B., Freeman, C. G., and McEwan, M. J. (1999). Gas
1372
+ phase reactions of some positive ions with atomic and molecular oxygen and nitric oxide at
1373
+ 300 K, J. Phys. Chem. A, 103, 7470-7473, doi:10.1021/jp9913719.
1374
+
1375
+ Selwyn, G., Podolske, J., and Johnston, H. S. (1977). Nitrous oxide ultraviolet absorption
1376
+ spectrum
1377
+ at
1378
+ stratospheric
1379
+ temperatures,
1380
+ Geophys.
1381
+ Res.
1382
+ Lett.,
1383
+ 4,
1384
+ 427-430,
1385
+ doi:10.1029/GL004i010p00427.
1386
+
1387
+ Serdyuchenko, A., Gorshelev, V., Weber, M., Chehade, W., and Burrows, J. P. (2014). High
1388
+ spectral resolution ozone absorption cross-sections – Part 2: Temperature dependence, Atmos.
1389
+ Meas. Tech., 7, 625–636, doi:10.5194/amt-7-625-2014.
1390
+
1391
+ Troe, J. (2005). Temperature and pressure dependence of ion–molecule association and
1392
+ dissociation reactions: the N2+ + N2 (+ M) ⇔ N4+ (+ M) reaction, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
1393
+ 7, 1560-1567, doi:10.1039/B417945P.
1394
+
1395
+ Turnipseed, A. A., Vaghjiani, G. L., Thompson, J. E., and Ravishankara, A. R. (1992).
1396
+ Photodissociation of HNO3 at 193, 222, and 248 nm: Products and quantum yields, J. Chem.
1397
+ Phys., 1992, 96, 5887-5895, doi:10.1063/1.462685.
1398
+
1399
+ Vandaele, A. C., Hermans, C., Simon, P. C., Carleer, M., Colins, R., Fally, S., Mérienne, M. F.,
1400
+ Jenouvrier, A., and Coquart, B. (1998). Measurements of the NO2 absorption cross-sections
1401
+ from 42000 cm-1 to 10000 cm-1 (238-1000 nm) at 220 K and 294 K, J. Quant. Spectrosc.
1402
+
1403
+
1404
+ 23
1405
+ Radiat. Transfer, 59, 171-184, doi:10.1016/S0022-4073(97)00168-4.
1406
+
1407
+ Verronen, P. T., Andersson, M. E., Marsh, D. R., Kovács, T., and Plane, J. M. C. (2016), WACCM-
1408
+ D—Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model with D-region ion chemistry, J. Adv.
1409
+ Model. Earth Syst., 8, 954–975, doi:10.1002/2015MS000592.
1410
+
1411
+ Wayne, R. P., Barnes, I., Burrows, J. P., Canosa-Mas, C. E., Hjorth, J., Le Bras, G., Moortgat,
1412
+ G.K., Perner, D., Poulet, G., Restelli, G., and Sidebottom, H. (1991). The nitrate radical:
1413
+ Physics, chemistry, and the atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 25A, 1-203, doi:10.1016/0960-
1414
+ 1686(91)90192-A.
1415
+
1416
+ Williams, D. (2021). Mars Fact Sheet, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, retrieved on 16
1417
+ October 2022.
1418
+
1419
+ Woods, T. N., Chamberlin, P. C., Harder, J. W., Hock, R. A., Snow, M., Eparvier, F. G., Fontenla,
1420
+ J., McClintock, W. E., and Richard, E. C. (2009). Solar Irradiance Reference Spectra (SIRS)
1421
+ for the 2008 Whole Heliosphere Interval (WHI), Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L01101,
1422
+ doi:10.1029/2008GL036373.
1423
+
1424
+ Yoshida, T., Aoki, S., Ueno, Y., Terada, N., Nakamura, Y., Shiobara, K., Yoshida, N., Nakagawa,
1425
+ H., Sakai, S., and Koyama, S. (2022). Strong depletion of 13C in CO induced by photolysis
1426
+ of CO2 in the Martian atmosphere calculated by a photochemical model, Planetary Science
1427
+ Journal, submitted.
1428
+
1429
+ Yoshino, K., Esmond, J. R., Cheung, A. S.-C, Freeman, D. E., and Parkinson, W. H. (1992). High
1430
+ resolution absorption cross sections in the transmission window region of the Schumann-
1431
+ Runge bands and Herzberg continuum of O2, Planetary and Space Science, 40, 2–3, 185-
1432
+ 192, doi:10.1016/0032-0633(92)90056-T.
1433
+
1434
+ Yoshino, K., Esmond, J. R., Parkinson, W. H., Ito, K., and Matsui, T. (1996). Absorption cross
1435
+ section measurements of water vapor in the wavelength region 120 to 188 nm, Chem. Phys.,
1436
+ 211, 387-391, doi:10.1016/0301-0104(96)00210-8.
1437
+
1438
+ Yoshino, K., Esmond, J. R., Parkinson, W. H., Ito, K., Matsui, T. (1997). Absorption cross section
1439
+ measurements of water vapor in the wavelength region 120 nm to 188 nm (Chem. Phys. 211
1440
+ (1996) 387–391). Chemical Physics, 215. 429-430, doi:10.1016/s0301-0104(96)00381-3.
1441
+
1442
+
1443
+ 24
1444
+
1445
+ Yoshino, K., Parkinson, W. H., Ito, K., and Matsui, T. (2005). Absolute absorption cross-section
1446
+ measurements of Schumann-Runge continuum of O2 at 90 and 295 K, J. Mol. Spectrosc.,
1447
+ 229, 238-243, doi:10.1016/j.jms.2004.08.020.
1448
+
1449
+ Zahnle, K., Claire, M. and Catling, D. (2006). The loss of mass-independent fractionation in sulfur
1450
+ due to a Palaeoproterozoic collapse of atmospheric methane, Geobiology, 4: 271-283,
1451
+ doi:10.1111/j.1472-4669.2006.00085.x.
1452
+
1453
+ Zelikoff, M., Watanabe, K., and Inn, E. C. Y. (1953). Absorption coefficients of gases in the
1454
+ vacuum ultraviolet. Part II. Nitrous oxide, J. Chem. Phys., 21, 1643-1647,
1455
+ doi:10.1063/1.1698636.
1456
+
1457
+
CtE0T4oBgHgl3EQfgQFr/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
ENE0T4oBgHgl3EQfgwE0/content/tmp_files/2301.02421v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,607 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Simpler and faster algorithms for detours in planar digraphs ∗
2
+ Meike Hatzel†
3
+ Konrad Majewski‡
4
+ Micha�l Pilipczuk§
5
+ Marek Soko�lowski¶
6
+ Abstract
7
+ In the Directed Detour problem one is given a digraph G and a pair of vertices
8
+ s and t, and the task is to decide whether there is a directed simple path from s to t
9
+ in G whose length is larger than distG(s, t). The more general parameterized variant,
10
+ Directed Long Detour, asks for a simple s-to-t path of length at least distG(s, t) + k,
11
+ for a given parameter k. Surprisingly, it is still unknown whether Directed Detour
12
+ is polynomial-time solvable on general digraphs. However, for planar digraphs, Wu and
13
+ Wang [Networks, ’15] proposed an O(n3)-time algorithm for Directed Detour, while
14
+ Fomin et al. [STACS 2022] gave a 2O(k)·nO(1)-time fpt algorithm for Directed Long De-
15
+ tour. The algorithm of Wu and Wang relies on a nontrivial analysis of how short detours
16
+ may look like in a plane embedding, while the algorithm of Fomin et al. is based on a reduc-
17
+ tion to the 3-Disjoint Paths problem on planar digraphs. This latter problem is solvable
18
+ in polynomial time using the algebraic machinery of Schrijver [SIAM J. Comp., ’94], but
19
+ the degree of the obtained polynomial factor is huge.
20
+ In this paper we propose two simple algorithms: we show how to solve, in planar
21
+ digraphs, Directed Detour in time O(n2) and Directed Long Detour in time
22
+ 2O(k) · n4 log n. In both cases, the idea is to reduce to the 2-Disjoint Paths problem
23
+ in a planar digraph, and to observe that the obtained instances of this problem have a
24
+ certain topological structure that makes them amenable to a direct greedy strategy.
25
+ ∗This work is a part of project BOBR (KM, MP, MS) that has received funding from the European Research
26
+ Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement
27
+ No. 948057). M. Hatzel was supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and by a
28
+ fellowship within the IFI programme of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).
29
+ †National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan ([email protected])
30
+ ‡Institute of Informatics, University of Warsaw, Poland ([email protected])
31
+ §Institute of Informatics, University of Warsaw, Poland ([email protected])
32
+ ¶Institute of Informatics, University of Warsaw, Poland ([email protected])
33
+ arXiv:2301.02421v1 [cs.DM] 6 Jan 2023
34
+
35
+ erc
36
+ European Research Council
37
+ Established by the European CommissionSPONSOREDBYTHE
38
+ Federal Ministry
39
+ of Education
40
+ and Research1
41
+ Introduction
42
+ The complexity status of Directed Detour is arguably one of the most tantalizing open
43
+ questions within the area of graph algorithms. The problem asks to decide, for a given digraph
44
+ G and two terminals s and t, whether there is a simple path in G from s to t that is not
45
+ the shortest — has length strictly larger than distG(s, t). It is still unknown whether this
46
+ problem is polynomial-time solvable on general digraphs. See the work of Fomin et al. [3] for
47
+ a discussion of relevant literature.
48
+ Given this state of the affairs, it is interesting to study Directed Detour on restricted
49
+ classes of digraphs, in hope for finding more positive results or useful insight. In this vein,
50
+ a particularly well-motivated idea is to consider the class of planar digraphs. The reason for
51
+ this is that in planar digraphs, the k-Disjoint Paths problem — decide the existence of
52
+ disjoint directed paths linking given k pairs of terminals — is polynomial-time solvable for
53
+ every fixed k [8], and even fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by k [2]. This is
54
+ not the case in general digraphs, where the problem is NP-hard already for k = 2 [5]. This
55
+ can be used for Directed Detour. Namely, Fomin et al. [3] showed that the more general
56
+ parameterized version of the problem — Directed Long Detour, where we look for a
57
+ simple s-to-t path of length at least distG(s, t) + k, for a given parameter k — can be reduced
58
+ (with a 2O(k) · nO(1) multiplicative overhead in the complexity) to 3-Disjoint Paths, which
59
+ can be solved in polynomial time in planar digraph using the algorithm of Schrijver [8]. This
60
+ of course applies also to the basic Directed Detour problem by setting k = 1, but even
61
+ earlier Wu and Wang [9] gave a direct O(n3)-time algorithm for this case.
62
+ While the reduction of Fomin et al. [3] is actually quite simple, the algorithm of Schri-
63
+ jver [8] for 3-Disjoint Paths in planar digraphs is not, as it relies on an involved algebraic
64
+ framework. In particular, the degree of the polynomial bounding the running time is at least
65
+ a two-digit number. On the other hand, the cubic algorithm of Wu and Wang [9] is also quite
66
+ complicated and relies on an analysis of different planar configurations that may occur.
67
+ In this work we propose two simple algorithms: one for Directed Detour and one for
68
+ Directed Long Detour, both in planar digraphs. These are summarized below.
69
+ Theorem 1.1. Directed Detour in planar digraphs can be solved in time O(n2).
70
+ Theorem 1.2. Directed Long Detour in planar digraphs can be solved in time 2O(k) ·n4
71
+ by a Monte Carlo algorithm, or deterministically in time 2O(k) · n4 log n.
72
+ The main idea in the proof of Theorem 1.1 is to perform a reduction to the 2-Disjoint
73
+ Paths problem, roughly similarly as in the work of Fomin et al. [3]. However, we observe that
74
+ if this reduction is performed carefully, then one essentially obtains an instance of 2-Disjoint
75
+ Paths where three out of four terminals lie on one face, say the outer face. Such instances
76
+ can be solved very easily: one of the paths — the one with both terminals on the outer face
77
+ — can be chosen greedily so that it leaves the maximum possible space for the other path.
78
+ Then the other path can be found by a simple reachability check.
79
+ For Theorem 1.2, as in Fomin et al. [3], we use the result of Bez´akov´a et al. [1] that the
80
+ Exact Directed Long Detour problem — finding a shortest s-to-t path of length exactly
81
+ distG(s, t) + k — can be solved in time 2O(k) · n2, even on general digraphs. This allows us
82
+ to assume, when solving Directed Long Detour, that there are no s-to-t paths of length
83
+ between distG(s, t)+k and distG(s, t)+3k. Having this assumption, the proof of Theorem 1.2
84
+ proceeds by expanding the basic idea behind Theorem 1.1 with color coding.
85
+ 1
86
+
87
+ We believe that compared to [3,9], our algorithms provide a simpler explanation for the
88
+ tractability of Directed (Long) Detour in planar digraphs. While we do not expect that
89
+ the gained insight will be directly applicable to the case of general digraphs, we hope that
90
+ it might be a better starting point for generalizations to less restrictive topological graph
91
+ classes, for instance to digraphs of bounded genus or digraphs whose underlying undirected
92
+ graphs exclude a fixed minor.
93
+ 2
94
+ Preliminaries
95
+ Graphs.
96
+ In this paper we consider planar directed graphs G = (V (G), E(G)).
97
+ For the
98
+ purposes of our problem, we can assume that the input graphs are simple, that is, they do
99
+ not have self-loops or multiple arcs connecting two vertices in the same direction. Moreover,
100
+ we assume that G is weakly connected, that is, the underlying undirected graph is connected.
101
+ For convenience, we set n = |V (G)| and m = |E(G)|. Since G is planar and simple, we have
102
+ that m ∈ O(n).
103
+ Given an arc e = uv ∈ E(G), we say that u is the tail of e and v is the head of e. Here,
104
+ we consider e incident to both u and v. A sequence v1v2 . . . vk of vertices is called a walk in
105
+ G if for each i ∈ {1, . . . , k − 1}, vivi+1 is an arc in G. The vertex v1 is called the origin of
106
+ the walk, while vk is its destination. If the vertices of a walk are pairwise different, the walk
107
+ is a path. Given two walks W1, W2, if the destination of W1 coincides with the origin of W2,
108
+ then we define W1 ◦ W2 as the concatenation of both walks. The length of a path P, denoted
109
+ length(P), is the number of arcs it contains. Given a path P and two of its vertices x and
110
+ y, we denote by P[x → y] the subpath of P which starts at x, goes along the arcs of P, and
111
+ ends in y.
112
+ Given a pair of vertices u, v ∈ V (G), the distance from u to v in G is the length of the
113
+ shortest u-to-v-path in G and is denoted by distG(u, v). If there is no directed path from u
114
+ to v in G, we put distG(u, v) = +∞. If the graph G is known from the context, we may omit
115
+ G from the notation and simply write dist(u, v).
116
+ Plane embeddings.
117
+ Given a planar graph G, its embedding into the plane is a mapping
118
+ of the vertices of G to pairwise distinct points in the plane and the arcs of G to plane curves,
119
+ so that:
120
+ • each arc uv ∈ E(G) is mapped to a plane curve whose endpoints coincide with the
121
+ images of u and v, and such that no other vertex of G is mapped to a point on the
122
+ curve; and
123
+ • the images of the edges of G are pairwise internally disjoint.
124
+ A plane graph is a planar graph together with a fixed embedding of the graph into the plane.
125
+ Such an embedding splits the plane in a number of regions, called faces. One of the faces
126
+ is unbounded and called the outer face. Given a face F, its boundary ∂F can be described
127
+ as a cyclic sequence of arcs bounding F (assuming G is connected). If ∂F is isomorphic to
128
+ a simple polygon (ignoring the orientations of the arcs), we say that F is simple.
129
+ For algorithmic purposes, we represent planar embeddings combinatorially: each vertex v
130
+ of the graph stores the anti-clockwise ordering of all arcs of G incident to v. Given a planar
131
+ graph G, its combinatorial embedding can be computed in time linear with respect to the
132
+ 2
133
+
134
+ F
135
+ v
136
+ w
137
+ P1
138
+ P2
139
+ P3
140
+ (a)
141
+ F
142
+ v
143
+ w
144
+ P
145
+ (b)
146
+ Figure 1: (a) Three (v, w)-grounded paths. We have P1 ≺lex P2 ≺lex P3, P1 ≺top P2, P1 ≺top
147
+ P3, but P2 ̸≺top P3. (b) A (v, w)-grounded path P and its left area ΓL(P) (filled in blue).
148
+ size of the graph [6]. Note that the combinatorial embedding uniquely determines the faces
149
+ of the planar graph, however, it does not designate the outer face of the embedding. Hence,
150
+ in our algorithms, we may elect any face to be the outer face.
151
+ Comparing paths in plane graphs.
152
+ Let G be a plane graph and F be its outer face.
153
+ Assume that F is simple. We say that a path P in G is v-grounded (with respect to F) if its
154
+ origin v is a vertex of F. Moreover, we say that P is (v, w)-grounded (with respect to F) if
155
+ both its origin v and its destination w are vertices of F. We now present two ways to compare
156
+ (doubly) grounded paths in G. We note that the following definitions are standard.
157
+ Definition 2.1. Assume that P1 and P2 are two different v-grounded paths with respect to a
158
+ face F in a plane graph G. We say that P1 is lexicographically left of P2 (denoted P1 ≺lex P2)
159
+ if one of the following conditions holds:
160
+ • P1 is a prefix of P2; or
161
+ • consider a plane graph Gv created by taking G, together with its planar embedding, and
162
+ adding a fresh vertex v′ and a fresh arc v′v, mapped to the plane so that the image of
163
+ v′ is placed outside of F (i.e., so that v′ is not enclosed by the boundary of F). Let P ′
164
+ 1
165
+ and P ′
166
+ 2 be paths in Gv, constructed by prepending v′ to P1 and P2, respectively. Let q be
167
+ the last vertex of the longest common prefix of P ′
168
+ 1 and P ′
169
+ 2, p be the vertex preceding q on
170
+ the common prefix, and r1 ̸= r2 be the vertices succeeding q on P ′
171
+ 1 and P ′
172
+ 2, respectively.
173
+ Then, the arcs pq, qr1 and qr2 are embedded clockwise in this order around q.
174
+ Intuitively, P1 ≺lex P2 if at the end of the common prefix of P1 and P2, the path P1
175
+ terminates or branches off left of P2 (Figure 1(a)). Observe that ≺lex induces a linear order
176
+ on all paths grounded at a vertex v ∈ V (F). Thus, given any vertex w ∈ V (G) reachable
177
+ 3
178
+
179
+ from v in G, we define Lvw, the lexicographically leftmost path from v to w, as the unique
180
+ minimal path from v to w with respect to ≺lex. Given a combinatorial embedding of G, we
181
+ can compute the lexicographically leftmost path from v to w in time O(n): it suffices to run
182
+ a depth-first search of G in which each vertex considers all its neighbors in the left-to-right
183
+ order.
184
+ We follow with a more restrictive way of comparing paths in G. Given a (v, w)-grounded
185
+ path P, we define the area left of P, denoted ΓL(P), as the region of the plane whose anti-
186
+ clockwise boundary is the closed walk defined as the concatenation of P and the anti-clockwise
187
+ segment of the boundary of F from w to v (Figure 1(b)). Note that the interior of ΓL(P)
188
+ may be disconnected if P internally intersects the boundary of F.
189
+ Definition 2.2. Given two (v, w)-grounded paths P1 and P2, we say that P1 is topologically
190
+ left of P2 (denoted P1 ≺top P2) if ΓL(P1) ⊊ ΓL(P2).
191
+ Note that if P1 ≺top P2, then P1 ≺lex P2. Thus, ≺top is a partial order on the set of
192
+ all (v, w)-grounded paths, and ≺lex restricted to those paths is a linear extension of ≺top.
193
+ It is straightforward to observe that the lexicographically leftmost path from v to w — the
194
+ minimum (v, w)-grounded path in ≺lex — is also the unique minimum (v, w)-grounded path
195
+ in ≺top. So if both v and w lie on F, we call Lvw simply the leftmost path from v to w.
196
+ Analogously, we define the (lexicographically) rightmost path from v to w, denoted Rvw,
197
+ and the area right of a (v, w)-grounded path P, denoted ΓR(P).
198
+ Note that each (v, w)-
199
+ grounded path P splits the graph into two parts: the area ΓL(P) left of P and the area ΓR(P)
200
+ right of P, with both areas intersecting only at P.
201
+ Simplifying the outer face.
202
+ Both the lexicographical and the topological comparisons
203
+ of grounded paths require the outer face F of a plane graph G to be simple. However, this
204
+ precondition might not be satisfied in the setting of our problem. To alleviate this issue, we
205
+ show how to simplify the outer face by adding two directed arcs to the plane graph.
206
+ Let u and v be two vertices of F. The (u, v)-simplification of the outer face in G, denoted
207
+ Simplify(G, u, v), is the digraph obtained from G by adding two arcs f1, f2, each from u to v.
208
+ Both arcs are embedded in the outer face F of G, so that the outer face of Simplify(G, u, v) is
209
+ bounded by f1 and f2 (see Figure 2). Thus, the outer face of Simplify(G, u, v) is simple and
210
+ contains two vertices, u and v. We remark that Simplify(G, u, v) is not necessarily a simple
211
+ digraph; however, this does not pose a problem since after the simplification, the number of
212
+ edges of the graph is still linearly bounded in the number of vertices of the graph.
213
+ Cutting arcs of plane graphs.
214
+ We finally describe an operation on plane graphs that
215
+ introduces new vertices to the outer face F of the embedding. Assume that F is simple. Take
216
+ two vertices u ∈ V (F), v /∈ V (F), both incident to an arc e ∈ E(G). An operation of cutting
217
+ the graph along e produces a new graph Ge which is the result of the following process (see
218
+ Figure 3):
219
+ 1. Enumerate all arcs incident to u in anti-clockwise order: e1, e2, . . . , ek, where e1, ek ∈
220
+ E(F).
221
+ 2. Let ℓ ∈ {2, 3, . . . , k − 1} be such that eℓ = e.
222
+ 3. Remove u from the graph, along with all arcs incident to u.
223
+ 4
224
+
225
+ u
226
+ v
227
+ u
228
+ v
229
+ f1
230
+ f2
231
+ Figure 2: An example plane digraph (left) and its (u, v)-simplification (right).
232
+ v
233
+ u
234
+ e
235
+ P
236
+ (a)
237
+ v
238
+ u2u1
239
+ (b)
240
+ (c)
241
+ Figure 3: (a) A directed plane graph G. (b) The result of cutting G along e. (c) The result
242
+ of cutting G along P.
243
+ 4. Introduce two new vertices u1, u2 to the graph. For each i ∈ {1, 2, . . . , ℓ}, add to the
244
+ graph a new arc e1
245
+ i which is obtained from the arc ei by replacing the endpoint u with u1.
246
+ Similarly, for each i ∈ {ℓ, ℓ + 1, . . . , k}, add to the graph a new arc e2
247
+ i which is obtained
248
+ from the arc ei by replacing the endpoint u with u2.
249
+ Intuitively, Ge is produced by drawing the graph G on a piece of paper and cutting the
250
+ piece of paper along e.
251
+ Note that after this operation, the resulting graph is still planar
252
+ (Figure 3).
253
+ Moreover, the outer face Fe of Ge is simple, and V (F) \ V (Fe) = {u} and
254
+ V (Fe) \ V (F) = {u1, v, u2}. That is, v now lies on the outer face of the new graph.
255
+ We can generalize this procedure to paths instead of just edges.
256
+ Assume that P =
257
+ v1v2 . . . vk is a v1-grounded path which is disjoint with V (F) except for v1. Then, cutting the
258
+ graph along P entails cutting the graph along the arcs v1v2, v2v3, . . . , vk−1vk, in this order.
259
+ This way we obtain a plane graph where the destination of the path lies on the outer face.
260
+ See Figure 3 for an illustration.
261
+ It is immediate that given the combinatorial embedding of a plane graph G, one can
262
+ compute a plane embedding of the graph obtained by cutting G along a path P in time linear
263
+ with respect to the size of the graph. Thus we again obtain a plane graph.
264
+ 5
265
+
266
+ 3
267
+ Directed Detour
268
+ In this section we prove Theorem 1.1.
269
+ Let G be a plane digraph, and let s, t ∈ V (G) be a pair of vertices. Recall that we assume
270
+ G to be weakly connected and we fix the plane embedding of G. Therefore, from now on
271
+ for simplicity we identify features in G (vertices, edges, paths, etc.) with their images under
272
+ the embedding. Our goal is to decide whether there is an s-to-t path in G of length at least
273
+ distG(s, t) + 1. We are going to reduce this question to solving a set of instances of the 2-
274
+ Disjoint Paths problem. The reduction is similar to the algorithm of Fomin et al. [3] for
275
+ Directed Long Detour.
276
+ First, we run breadth-first search (BFS) starting from s in G. Let Li denote the i-th layer
277
+ of this BFS, that is, Li = {v ∈ V (G) | distG(s, v) = i} for i ∈ {0, 1, . . . , n}.
278
+ Suppose now that the instance (G, s, t) is a yes-instance, and let P be an s-to-t path
279
+ witnessing this fact.
280
+ Since P is a non-shortest path from s to t, there is an index p ∈
281
+ {0, 1, . . . , n} such that the layer Lp contains at least two vertices of P. Let us choose p to
282
+ be the smallest such an index. Let G⩾p be the plane digraph obtained from G by removing
283
+ all the vertices in L0 ∪ L1 ∪ . . . ∪ Lp−1. We may assume that G⩾p is weakly connected, for
284
+ otherwise we discard all of its weakly connected components that do not contain the vertex t.
285
+ Claim 1. All vertices of Lp lie on one face of G⩾p.
286
+ Proof. Consider any vertex v of Lp and any shortest path Q from s to v in G. Observe that
287
+ all vertices of Q except for v lie in layers L0, L1, . . . , Lp−1, hence they are removed when
288
+ constructing G⩾p from G. We conclude that v lies on the boundary of the (unique) face of
289
+ G⩾p that contains s.
290
+ Denote by x and y, respectively, the first and the second vertex on the path P that lie in
291
+ the layer Lp. In our algorithm we iterate over all possible choices for the vertex y. Note that
292
+ the choice of y determines the value of p, because y ∈ Lp. Observe that if we guess the vertex
293
+ y correctly, then in order to find a non-shortest path from s to t it is enough to find a vertex
294
+ x ∈ Lp (x ̸= y) and three paths Pstart, Pmiddle and Pend such that
295
+ • Pstart is a shortest path from s to x in G; and
296
+ • Pmiddle, Pend are two internally vertex-disjoint paths in G⩾p going respectively from x
297
+ to y and from y to t.
298
+ Note that y might be equal to t and then Pend is a trivial path only consisting of the single
299
+ vertex t.
300
+ On one hand, vertices x and y divide P into subpaths Pstart, Pmiddle, and Pend satisfying the
301
+ properties stated above. On the other hand, if we find a vertex x and paths Pstart, Pmiddle, Pend
302
+ satisfying the above, then their concatenation forms a valid solution. This is because the
303
+ path Pstart goes consecutively through layers L0, L1, . . . , Lp due to being a shortest path,
304
+ and thus it is internally vertex-disjoint from Pmiddle and Pend. Also, the concatenation of
305
+ Pstart, Pmiddle, Pend is a non-shortest path from s to t due to containing at least two different
306
+ vertices from layer Lp.
307
+ It would be natural to also iterate through all possible choices for x, but for the sake of
308
+ optimizing the running time we do the following instead. Construct a digraph H from the
309
+ digraph G⩾p by adding to it a vertex xsuper together with arcs xsuperu for all u ∈ Lp \ {y}.
310
+ 6
311
+
312
+ Claim 2. H is a planar digraph and its implicit embedding can be obtained from the implicit
313
+ embedding of G⩾p in linear time.
314
+ Proof. It suffices to extend the implicit embedding of G⩾p by embedding xsuper anywhere in
315
+ the unique face whose boundary contains all vertices of Lp (which exists by Claim 1) and
316
+ draw arcs connecting xsuper with vertices of Lp \ {y} within this face. It is straightforward to
317
+ see that this can be done in the setting of implicit embeddings in linear time.
318
+ Observe that pairs (P1, P2) of internally vertex-disjoint paths going respectively from xsuper
319
+ to y in H and from y to t in H correspond one-to-one to pairs (Pmiddle, Pend) of internally
320
+ vertex-disjoint paths going respectively from some vertex x ∈ Lp (x ̸= y) to y in G⩾p and
321
+ from y to t in G⩾p. We may additionally assume that the face of H containing both xsuper
322
+ and y is the outer face of H. This way we reduced our original problem to a set of at most n
323
+ instances (one instance per each choice of the vertex y) of the following problem:
324
+ Problem A
325
+ Input: A plane digraph H and three vertices x, y, t ∈ V (H), where x and y lie on the
326
+ outer face of H.
327
+ Question: Are there two internally vertex-disjoint paths P1 and P2 such that P1 is
328
+ an x-to-y path and P2 is a y-to-t path in H?
329
+ So to conclude Theorem 1.1 it is enough to show the following lemma.
330
+ Lemma 3.1. Problem A can be solved in time O(n).
331
+ Proof. Let H⋆ be a (y, x)-simplification of the outer face of H. Naturally, the outer face of H⋆
332
+ is simple. Moreover, (H⋆, x, y, t) is a yes-instance if and only if (H, x, y, t) is a yes-instance:
333
+ H⋆ is exactly the graph H with two additional yx arcs, which plainly cannot be a part of the
334
+ sought solution.
335
+ Suppose now that (H⋆, x, y, t) is a yes-instance, and let (P1, P2) be a pair of paths in H⋆
336
+ that form a solution to Problem A on H⋆. P1 connects x to y which lie on the outer face
337
+ FO of H⋆ (which is a simple cycle), thus it is (x, y)-grounded with respect to FO. Therefore,
338
+ it splits the whole digraph H into two parts, the area ΓL(P1) left of P1 and the area ΓR(P1)
339
+ right of P1, with both areas intersecting only at P1. Since P2 is internally disjoint with P1, it
340
+ must be entirely contained within ΓL(P1) or ΓR(P1); without loss of generality assume that
341
+ P2 is contained in the latter. Then, let Lx,y be the leftmost path from x to y in H⋆.
342
+ Claim 3. (Lx,y, P2) is also a valid solution to Problem A.
343
+ Proof. By the definition of the leftmost path we know that ΓL(Lx,y) ⊆ ΓL(P1), that is, Lx,y
344
+ cannot use any vertex lying on the right side of P1. Since all vertices of P2 (apart from y) lie
345
+ on the right side of P1 we conclude the claim.
346
+ An analogous argument shows that if P2 is contained in ΓL(P1), then (Rx,y, P2) is a valid
347
+ solution to Problem A, where Rx,y is the rightmost path from x to y in H⋆.
348
+ By the
349
+ observation above, we know that in order to verify whether (H⋆, x, y, t) is a yes-instance it is
350
+ enough to find Lx,y and Rx,y as candidates for P1, and to check for each candidate whether
351
+ the vertex t is reachable from y in H⋆ − (V (P1) \ {y}). All these checks can be done in time
352
+ O(n) by running a proper depth-first search algorithm.
353
+ 7
354
+
355
+ 4
356
+ Directed Long Detour
357
+ In this section we prove Theorem 1.2.
358
+ We are given a plane digraph G, two vertices s, t ∈ V (G) and an integer k ∈ N. As in
359
+ Section 3, we assume that G is weakly connected, and we fix the plane embedding of G. We
360
+ need to decide whether there is an s-to-t path in G of length at least distG(s, t) + k. We are
361
+ going to reduce this question to solving a set of instances of the 2-Disjoint Paths problem
362
+ (with some additional requirements).
363
+ We begin with running the algorithm of Bez´akov´a et al. [1] to check whether there is
364
+ an s-to-t path of length distG(s, t) + l for some l ∈ {k, k + 1, . . . , 3k − 1}. From now on, we
365
+ assume there is no such s-to-t path.
366
+ As in Section 3, we run a BFS starting from s in G and set Li = {v ∈ V (G) | distG(s, v) =
367
+ i} for i = 0, 1, . . . , n. For i = 1, 2, . . . , n, let G⩾i be the plane digraph obtained from G by
368
+ removing all the vertices in L0 ∪ . . . ∪ Li−1. Again, without loss of generality, we assume that
369
+ G⩾i is weakly connected.
370
+ Now, we iterate through all values for p = 1, 2, . . . , n, and through all choices for x, y ∈ Lp,
371
+ where x ̸= y (there are at most n2 choices for (p, x, y)). Recall from Section 3 (Section 1)
372
+ that both x and y lie on the outer face of G⩾p. Next, let Gx,y
373
+ ⩾p be the (y, x)-simplification of
374
+ the outer face of G⩾p. We are now going to search for three paths Pstart, Pmiddle and Pend
375
+ satisfying the conditions:
376
+ (a) Pstart is a shortest s-to-x path in G;
377
+ (b) Pmiddle is an (x, y)-grounded path in Gx,y
378
+ ⩾p of length at least 2k;
379
+ (c) Pend is a y-to-t path in Gx,y
380
+ ⩾p;
381
+ (d) paths Pmiddle and Pend are internally vertex-disjoint; and
382
+ (e) if Pend ⊆ ΓR(Pmiddle), then there is no (x, y)-grounded path P ′
383
+ middle in Gx,y
384
+ ⩾p of length at
385
+ least k such that P ′
386
+ middle ≺top Pmiddle; and if Pend ⊆ ΓL(Pmiddle), then there is no such
387
+ path with Pmiddle ≺top P ′
388
+ middle.
389
+ We remark that the two yx arcs added in the process of (y, x)-simplification of G⩾p cannot
390
+ be a part of any of the paths Pstart, Pmiddle, Pend and hence their existence can be safely ignored
391
+ in the following series of claims.
392
+ First, we show that the procedure described above is actually equivalent to solving the
393
+ Directed Long Detour problem on the instance (G, s, t, k).
394
+ Claim 4. Assume that the paths Pstart, Pmiddle and Pend satisfy the properties (a) – (d) above.
395
+ Then the concatenation
396
+ P = Pstart ◦ Pmiddle ◦ Pend
397
+ forms a valid solution for the Directed Long Detour problem.
398
+ Proof. First, P is a simple s-to-t path. Indeed, Pmiddle and Pend are internally vertex-disjoint
399
+ by property (d). Moreover, since the path Pstart is a shortest s-to-x path in G, it does not use
400
+ any vertex of Lp ∪. . .∪Ln = V (G⩾p) apart from x, and thus Pstart is internally vertex-disjoint
401
+ from Pmiddle and Pend as well.
402
+ 8
403
+
404
+ By property (b) the length of P is at least
405
+ distG(s, x) + 2k + distG(y, t) = distG(s, y) + 2k + distG(y, t) ⩾ distG(s, t) + 2k,
406
+ which finishes the proof.
407
+ Claim 5. If (G, s, t, k) is a yes-instance, then there exist an integer p ∈ N and vertices
408
+ x, y ∈ Lp for which there are paths Pstart, Pmiddle and Pend satisfying the properties (a) – (e).
409
+ Proof. Assume that (G, s, t, k) is a yes-instance. Let P be an s-to-t path witnessing this fact.
410
+ If there are many such paths, we choose P to be a shortest one. As we established that there
411
+ is no s-to-t path of length distG(s, t) + l for any l ∈ {k, k + 1, . . . , 3k − 1}, we may assume
412
+ that the path P is of length at least distG(s, t) + 3k. Since P is a non-shortest s-to-t path,
413
+ we may define p ∈ {1, 2, . . . , n} to be the smallest index such that Lp contains at least two
414
+ vertices of the path P. Let x and y be, respectively, the first and the second vertex on the
415
+ path P that lie in the layer Lp.
416
+ By definition of p, the subpath P[s → x] is a shortest s-to-x path, and thus we may set
417
+ Pstart := P[s → x]. We also set Pend := P[y → t]. We will choose Pmiddle later in the course
418
+ of the proof.
419
+ Let us observe that the length of the subpath P[x → y] is at least 2k: otherwise, we
420
+ consider the path P ′ being the concatenation of a shortest s-to-y path in G and the subpath
421
+ P[y → t]. As in Claim 4, we argue that P ′ is a simple s-to-t path in G, and the length of P ′
422
+ is
423
+ distG(s, y) + length(P[y → t]) = distG(s, x) + length(P[y → t])
424
+ = length(P) − length(P[x → y])
425
+ > (distG(s, t) + 3k) − 2k = distG(s, t) + k.
426
+ Hence, P ′ is also a valid solution for our instance (G, s, t, k) that is shorter than P, which is
427
+ a contradiction.
428
+ Since P[x → y] is an (x, y)-grounded path in Gx,y
429
+ ⩾p and is internally disjoint from P[y → t],
430
+ we may assume that P[y → t] ⊆ ΓR(P[x → y]) in Gx,y
431
+ ⩾p; the case P[y → t] ⊆ ΓL(P[x → y]) is
432
+ symmetric.
433
+ Observe now, that if we set Pmiddle := P[x → y], then the properties (a) – (d) are satisfied.
434
+ If the condition (e) holds as well, then we are done. Otherwise, we define Pmiddle as a minimal,
435
+ with respect to ≺top, (x, y)-grounded path in Gx,y
436
+ ⩾p of length at least 2k. Then, Pmiddle ≺top
437
+ P[x → y], and consequently Pmiddle is internally vertex disjoint from Pend = P[y → t] as we
438
+ have P[y → t] ⊆ ΓR(P[x → y]).
439
+ It remains to show that the pair (Pmiddle, Pend) satisfies the property (e). By the definition
440
+ of Pmiddle we know there is no (x, y)-grounded path of length at least 2k which is topologically
441
+ left of Pmiddle. Suppose now that there exists an (x, y)-grounded path P ′
442
+ middle in Gx,y
443
+ ⩾p such
444
+ that P ′
445
+ middle ≺top Pmiddle and length(P ′
446
+ middle) ∈ [k, 2k − 1]. Consider the following walk P ′:
447
+ P ′ = P[s → x] ◦ P ′
448
+ middle ◦ P[y → t].
449
+ P ′ is a simple path as in G⩾p we have P ′
450
+ middle ≺top Pmiddle ≺top P[x → y] and P[y → t] ⊆
451
+ ΓR(P[x → y]), therefore P ′
452
+ middle is internally vertex-disjoint from both P[s → x] and P[y → t].
453
+ Moreover, the length of P ′ is at least
454
+ distG(s, x) + length
455
+
456
+ P ′
457
+ middle
458
+
459
+ + distG(y, t) =
460
+ distG(s, y) + distG(y, t) + length
461
+
462
+ P ′
463
+ middle
464
+
465
+ ⩾ distG(s, t) + length
466
+
467
+ P ′
468
+ middle
469
+
470
+ ⩾ distG(s, t) + k.
471
+ 9
472
+
473
+ Consequently, P ′ is a valid solution for the instance (G, s, t, k). Finally, since length(P ′
474
+ middle) <
475
+ 2k ⩽ length(P[x → y]), the path P ′ is shorter than the path P which is a contradiction.
476
+ It remains to show how we can find paths Pstart, Pmiddle and Pend satisfying the above-
477
+ mentioned conditions. Let us assume that we guess the values of p, x and y correctly. By
478
+ Claim 4, we know that Pstart can be set to any shortest s-to-x path, and we see that in order
479
+ to find the desired paths Pmiddle and Pend we can restrict ourselves to the digraph Gx,y
480
+ ⩾p. Let
481
+ us call a pair of paths (Pmiddle, Pend) special for (Gx,y
482
+ ⩾p, x, y, t, k) if they satisfy the properties
483
+ (b) – (e) stated above. This reduces our instance of the Directed Long Detour problem
484
+ to solving the set of at most n2 instances (one for each choice of x and y) of the following
485
+ problem (with H := Gx,y
486
+ ⩾p).
487
+ Problem B
488
+ Input: A plane digraph H, three vertices x, y, t ∈ V (H), and an integer k ∈ N, where
489
+ x and y lie on the outer face of H. The outer face of H is simple and contains only the
490
+ vertices x and y.
491
+ Question: Does there exist a special pair of paths (P1, P2) for (H, x, y, t, k)?
492
+ To finish the proof of Claim 1.2 it is enough to show the following lemma.
493
+ Lemma 4.1. Problem B can be solved in time 2O(k) · n2 by a Monte Carlo algorithm, or
494
+ deterministically in time 2O(k) · n2 log n.
495
+ Proof. We use a variant of the standard color coding technique [4]. Let us color independently
496
+ every vertex of H with one of two colors, say green and blue, each with probability 1
497
+ 2.
498
+ Assume for now that (H, x, y, t, k) is a yes-instance, and let (P1, P2) be a special pair of
499
+ paths for our instance. As per our previous considerations, we know that P2 ⊆ ΓL(P1) or
500
+ P2 ⊆ ΓR(P1). Without loss of generality assume that P2 ⊆ ΓR(P1). Recall that length(P1) ⩾
501
+ 2k. Therefore, we may define x′ to be the k-th vertex on P1 and y′ to be the k-th vertex
502
+ from the end of P1. Then, length(P1[x → x′]) = length(P1[y′ → y]) = k − 1 and the paths
503
+ P1[x → x′] and P1[y′ → y] are vertex-disjoint.
504
+ Suppose that the colors are assigned in such a way that all vertices of the path P1[x → x′]
505
+ are green, and all vertices of the path P1[y′ → y] are blue. The probability of such an event
506
+ occurring is (1/2)2k. Let G be the set of green vertices of H in the random coloring. Note
507
+ that we assume that V (P1[x → x′]) ⊆ G.
508
+ Claim 6. P1[x → x′] is the lexicographically leftmost x-to-x′ path in H entirely contained
509
+ in G.
510
+ Proof. Suppose that there is an x-to-x′ path Q in H, entirely contained in G, such that
511
+ Q ≺lex P1[x → x′]. Let q ∈ V (H) be the vertex for which path P1[x → q] is the longest
512
+ common prefix of P1 and Q. Also, let r be the first vertex on Q[q → x′], not including q,
513
+ such that r ∈ V (P1). Here, r is well-defined as the vertex x′ belongs to both Q[q → x′] and
514
+ P1. Since r lies on Q, we necessarily have that r is green. Thus, r ̸∈ V (P1[y′ → y]) since
515
+ P1[y′ → y] consists only of blue vertices. Hence, the following walk P ′
516
+ 1:
517
+ P ′
518
+ 1 = Q[x → r] ◦ P1[r → y]
519
+ 10
520
+
521
+ is an (x, y)-grounded path in H of length at least
522
+ length
523
+
524
+ P1[y′ → y])
525
+
526
+ + 1 = k.
527
+ Recall that Q ≺lex P1 in H. By the definition of r we observe that Q[x → r] ≺top P1[x → r].
528
+ Hence, P ′
529
+ 1 ≺top P1. We conclude that the path P ′
530
+ 1 has length at least k and is left of P1,
531
+ which contradicts the property (e) of the pair (P1, P2).
532
+ Note that the path P1[x → x′] is disjoint from the set of vertices on the outer face of H,
533
+ apart from its first vertex x. This allows us to define Hcut as the plane digraph obtained from
534
+ H by cutting along the path P1[x → x′]. Next, let Z ⊆ V (Hcut) be the set of new vertices
535
+ introduced to H′ by this operation. Let H′ be a (y, x′)-simplification of the outer face of
536
+ Hcut.
537
+ Claim 7. P1[x′ → y] is the leftmost path in H′ among all the paths between x′ and y which
538
+ do not contain any vertex of Z.
539
+ Proof. Suppose that there is an x′-to-y path Q in H′ which avoids Z and satisfies Q ≺lex
540
+ P1[x′ → y]. Let q ∈ V (H) be the vertex of H such that Q[x′ → q] is the longest common
541
+ prefix of Q and P1[x′ → y]. Let r be the first vertex on Q[q → y] (not including q) such that
542
+ r ∈ V (P1).
543
+ Analogously as in the proof of Claim 6, we show that the walk P ′
544
+ 1 defined in H as follows:
545
+ P ′
546
+ 1 = P1[x → x′] ◦ Q[x′ → r] ◦ P1[r → y]
547
+ is a simple path of length at least k that lies lexicographically left of P1 in H. This leads to
548
+ a contradiction to property (e) of (P1, P2).
549
+ The observations above lead to an algorithm for Problem B. First, consider the case
550
+ where in the solution (P1, P2), we have that P2 ⊆ ΓR(P1). After the random assignment of
551
+ colors to vertices of H, we iterate through all vertices u ∈ V (H) \ {x, y, t} as candidates for
552
+ the vertex x′. Then, we find the leftmost path S from x to u in H whose all vertices are
553
+ green. Next, we construct Hcut and H′, and find the leftmost path T from u to y in H′ that
554
+ avoids any new vertices introduced to H′ by the split. Finally, we set P1 = S ◦ T. Then it
555
+ only remains to verify whether there exists any path P2 from y to t in H that is internally
556
+ disjoint with P1. All these checks can be done by running proper depth-first searches in total
557
+ linear time.
558
+ Next, we consider the case where P2 ⊆ ΓL(P1). Hence, we repeat all the above steps with
559
+ any leftmost paths in H replaced with the corresponding rightmost paths. To obtain the
560
+ constant probability of error, we repeat the entire process above 2O(k) times.
561
+ To derandomize this algorithm, instead of assigning the colors to vertices at random, we
562
+ construct and use an (n, 2k)-universal set [7]. In our case this universal set is a family U of
563
+ subsets of V (H) such that for any subset A of V (H) of size 2k the family {A ∩ U | U ∈ U}
564
+ contains all 22k subsets of A. We interpret each element of U as a single coloring, that is, a
565
+ subset A ∈ U corresponds to the coloring c which assigns color green to the vertices of A, and
566
+ blue to the rest.
567
+ We know that there is such family U of size 2O(k) · log n and it can be constructed in
568
+ time 2O(k) · n log n [7]. We construct it once in the algorithm, and instead of drawing random
569
+ colorings, we iterate through all elements of the constructed universal set U. By the property
570
+ 11
571
+
572
+ of U there is an element U ∈ U such that V (P1[x → x′]) ⊆ U and V (P1[y′ → y]) ∩ U = ∅
573
+ because |V (P1[x → x′]) ∪ V (P1[y′ → y])| = 2k.
574
+ This guarantees the correctness of our
575
+ deterministic algorithm.
576
+ Acknowledgement.
577
+ The authors thank Olek �Lukasiewicz for pointing us to the work of
578
+ Wu and Wang [9].
579
+ References
580
+ [1] Ivona Bez´akov´a, Radu Curticapean, Holger Dell, and Fedor V. Fomin. Finding detours is
581
+ fixed-parameter tractable. SIAM J. Discret. Math., 33(4):2326–2345, 2019.
582
+ [2] Marek Cygan, D´aniel Marx, Marcin Pilipczuk, and Micha�l Pilipczuk. The Planar Directed
583
+ k-Vertex-Disjoint Paths problem is fixed-parameter tractable. In 54th Annual IEEE Sym-
584
+ posium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2013, pages 197–206. IEEE Computer
585
+ Society, 2013.
586
+ [3] Fedor V. Fomin, Petr A. Golovach, William Lochet, Danil Sagunov, Kirill Simonov, and
587
+ Saket Saurabh. Detours in Directed Graphs. In 39th International Symposium on Theoret-
588
+ ical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS 2022, volume 219 of LIPIcs, pages 29:1–29:16.
589
+ Schloss Dagstuhl — Leibniz-Zentrum f¨ur Informatik, 2022.
590
+ [4] Fedor V. Fomin, Daniel Lokshtanov, Fahad Panolan, Saket Saurabh, and Meirav Zehavi.
591
+ Long directed (s, t)-path: FPT algorithm. Inf. Process. Lett., 140:8–12, 2018.
592
+ [5] Steven Fortune, John E. Hopcroft, and James Wyllie. The directed subgraph homeomor-
593
+ phism problem. Theor. Comput. Sci., 10:111–121, 1980.
594
+ [6] John E. Hopcroft and Robert Endre Tarjan.
595
+ Efficient Planarity Testing.
596
+ J. ACM,
597
+ 21(4):549–568, 1974.
598
+ [7] Moni Naor, Leonard J. Schulman, and Aravind Srinivasan. Splitters and near-optimal
599
+ derandomization. In 36th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Mil-
600
+ waukee, Wisconsin, USA, 23-25 October 1995, pages 182–191. IEEE Computer Society,
601
+ 1995.
602
+ [8] Alexander Schrijver. Finding k disjoint paths in a directed planar graph. SIAM J. Com-
603
+ put., 23(4):780–788, 1994.
604
+ [9] Bang Ye Wu and Hung-Lung Wang. The next-to-shortest path problem on directed graphs
605
+ with positive edge weights. Networks, 65(3):205–211, 2015.
606
+ 12
607
+
ENE0T4oBgHgl3EQfgwE0/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
FNE1T4oBgHgl3EQfWwTK/content/tmp_files/2301.03119v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1637 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Automatic Generation of German Drama Texts
2
+ Using Fine Tuned GPT-2 Models
3
+ Mariam Bangura, Kristina Barabashova, Anna Karnysheva, Sarah Semczuk, Yifan Wang
4
+ Universität des Saarlandes
5
+ {maba00008, krba00001, anka00001, s8sasemc, yiwa00003}@stud.uni-saarland.de
6
+ 7009604, 7023878, 7010958, 2573377, 7023035
7
+ Abstract
8
+ This study is devoted to the automatic gen-
9
+ eration of German drama texts. We suggest
10
+ an approach consisting of two key steps: fine-
11
+ tuning a GPT-2 model (the outline model) to
12
+ generate outlines of scenes based on keywords
13
+ and fine-tuning a second model (the generation
14
+ model) to generate scenes from the scene out-
15
+ line. The input for the neural model comprises
16
+ two datasets: the German Drama Corpus (Ger-
17
+ DraCor) and German Text Archive (Deutsches
18
+ Textarchiv or DTA). In order to estimate the ef-
19
+ fectiveness of the proposed method, our mod-
20
+ els are compared with baseline GPT-2 models.
21
+ Our models perform well according to auto-
22
+ matic quantitative evaluation, but, conversely,
23
+ manual qualitative analysis reveals a poor qual-
24
+ ity of generated texts. This may be due to the
25
+ quality of the dataset or training inputs.
26
+ 1
27
+ Introduction
28
+ Text generation is a subarea of natural language pro-
29
+ cessing (NLP), appearing in the 1970s (Goldman,
30
+ 1974). Its main purpose is the automatic genera-
31
+ tion of natural language texts, which can satisfy
32
+ particular communicative requirements (Liu and
33
+ Özsu, 2009). Text generation can be a constituent
34
+ of AI-based tools related to machine translation, di-
35
+ alogue systems, etc. Computational generation of
36
+ stories is specifically challenging task, as it refers
37
+ to the problem of selecting a sequence of events or
38
+ actions that meet a set of criteria and can be told as
39
+ a story (Alhussain and Azmi, 2021). Many studies
40
+ focus on automatic story generation (Cheong and
41
+ Young, 2014), however, a limited number of them
42
+ emphasize drama generation (Rosa et al., 2020).
43
+ Dramatic texts differ from other genres by hav-
44
+ ing dialogues of acting characters, authorial notes,
45
+ scenes, and other specific elements, usually written
46
+ for the purpose of being performed on stage (Leth-
47
+ bridge and Mildorf, 2004). Therefore, the methods
48
+ described in research devoted to generation of nar-
49
+ ratives or poetry is not always applicable for the
50
+ drama generation. The approaches considered in
51
+ our study are mentioned in Section 2.
52
+ Nowadays, some of the most advanced methods
53
+ for text generation comprise transformer decoder or
54
+ encoder-decoder architecture pre-trained on large-
55
+ scale unsupervised texts. In previous study refer-
56
+ ring to drama generation, GPT-2 is applied (Rosa
57
+ et al., 2021). In the current study, we propose an
58
+ approach to the generation of drama texts in Ger-
59
+ man, based on the production of outlines (Fan et al.,
60
+ 2018; Yao et al., 2018), and compare it with two
61
+ baseline GPT-2 models. The detailed information
62
+ about these models and their comparison can be
63
+ found in Section 4. The datasets, used as training
64
+ materials for the system, are described in Section
65
+ 3.
66
+ In order to analyze the performance of story gen-
67
+ eration models, various evaluation metrics can be
68
+ involved (Alabdulkarim et al., 2021). For the mod-
69
+ els represented in the current study, we propose
70
+ automatic quantitative evaluation along with man-
71
+ ual qualitative analysis, described in Section 5. The
72
+ main challenges and limitation referring to the pro-
73
+ posed approach and ideas for further improvement
74
+ of drama generation are discussed in Section 6.
75
+ 2
76
+ Related Work
77
+ Automatic text generation has long been a task
78
+ of research interests, and various approaches have
79
+ been proposed to improve the quality of generated
80
+ outputs. Among all genres, story generation sees
81
+ the most innovation and progress. Before the era of
82
+ deep learning, some structural and planning-based
83
+ models have been applied to perform story gener-
84
+ ation. The prevalence of RNN (Rumelhart et al.,
85
+ 1986) and LSTM (Hochreiter and Schmidhuber,
86
+ 1997) motivated researches to introduce deep learn-
87
+ ing to the field of text generation, which results
88
+ in higher model capacity and better performance.
89
+ Leveraging language models with more complex
90
+ architecture and pre-trained on large scale datasets
91
+ arXiv:2301.03119v1 [cs.CL] 8 Jan 2023
92
+
93
+ further improved the generation quality by a con-
94
+ siderable margin. (Alabdulkarim et al., 2021)
95
+ In addition to the increasing complexity of
96
+ model architecture, researchers are also committed
97
+ to proposing innovative generation schemes. Peng
98
+ et al. attempted to steer generation by adding con-
99
+ trol factors. They extracted control factors from ex-
100
+ isting corpora and trained a model conditioned on
101
+ them, so that users can control the generation pro-
102
+ cess by selecting different control factors. Fan et al.
103
+ (2018, 2019) explored the possibility of a hierarchi-
104
+ cal story generation process, where an intermediate
105
+ stage expands the given prompt and simplifies the
106
+ following generation process by conditioning it on
107
+ expanded prompts. Similarly, Wang et al. (2020)
108
+ also applied a two-stage story generation scheme,
109
+ where the system additional generates a story out-
110
+ line as a guideline for the second stage. It is shown
111
+ that the hierarchical generation scheme effectively
112
+ enhances the consistency and coherency of outputs.
113
+ Despite the similarities with story generation,
114
+ drama generation faces some extra challenges.
115
+ Firstly, a drama play is usually longer than the
116
+ upper limit of pre-trained language models, thus an
117
+ iterative generative process is necessary. Secondly,
118
+ the lack of prompt-output data makes it impossible
119
+ to adopt the same approaches as in story generation,
120
+ and the model must learn to generate plays from
121
+ nothing. The inherent difficulty of drama genera-
122
+ tion task discourages researches in this field. To our
123
+ best knowledge, the only drama generation model
124
+ is THEaiTRE project (Rosa et al., 2020, 2021). The
125
+ system leverages a GPT-2 model to generate each
126
+ scene step by step conditioned on both local and
127
+ remote contexts. However, the generative model is
128
+ not fine-tuned on any drama texts, and the genera-
129
+ tion process requires intensive human interference,
130
+ which compromise usability of the model and is
131
+ not suitable for amateur users.
132
+ 3
133
+ Drama Preprocessing
134
+ 3.1
135
+ Corpora
136
+ The input for the neural model were dramas from
137
+ the German Drama Corpus (GerDraCor) developed
138
+ by the Drama Corpora Project (DraCor) (Fischer
139
+ et al., 2019) and German Text Archive (Deutsches
140
+ Textarchiv or DTA) (Deutsches Textarchiv, 2022).
141
+ GerDraCor consists of 591 German dramas, with
142
+ the earliest written in the 1640s and the latest in the
143
+ 1940s. 46 dramas appeared to be the same with the
144
+ ones in DTA and were removed, resulting in 545
145
+ dramas used from GerDraCor. In the corpus, speak-
146
+ ers, stages and sets1, scenes and acts are annotated.
147
+ There is also metadata available for the whole cor-
148
+ pus and containing information about number of
149
+ speakers and their sex, number of acts and words,
150
+ etc.
151
+ DTA, hosted by the CLARIN service center at
152
+ the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and
153
+ Humanities, is the largest single corpus of his-
154
+ torical New High German that contains around
155
+ 1500 cross-genre texts from the early 16th to the
156
+ early 20th century. 92 drama texts with an ortho-
157
+ graphic normalization of historical spelling were
158
+ extracted from the corpus. One of them was ex-
159
+ cluded, as it was a poem. All historical spellings
160
+ are adopted true to the original, i.e., they are not
161
+ implicitly modernized. However, modern or oth-
162
+ erwise normalized equivalents of historical writ-
163
+ ings may be noted with the tags <orig> (histori-
164
+ cal spelling) and <reg> (modernized/normalized
165
+ spelling) (Deutsches Textarchiv, 2022).
166
+ The standard GerDraCor format and DTA basic
167
+ format (DTABf), which were used in this work,
168
+ follow the P5 guidelines of the Text Encoding Ini-
169
+ tiative (TEI), which are specified for the annotation
170
+ of historical printed works in a corpus (Deutsches
171
+ Textarchiv, 2022; Fischer et al., 2019). The TEI
172
+ Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and In-
173
+ terchange determines and document markup lan-
174
+ guages for the representation of the structural and
175
+ conceptual text features. They refer to a modu-
176
+ lar, extensible XML schema, consisting of a set
177
+ of markers (or tags) and accompanied by detailed
178
+ documentation, and they are published under an
179
+ open-source license2.
180
+ The following sections describe how dramas
181
+ from aforementioned sources were parsed and pre-
182
+ processed in Python.
183
+ 3.2
184
+ Drama Parsing
185
+ Parsing of dramas in XML format was performed
186
+ with XMLHandler class inheriting from Con-
187
+ tentHandler class from “xml.sax” module. This
188
+ class reads xml-tags and operates with their param-
189
+ eters and/or content between starting and closing
190
+ tags. The class contains methods that were over-
191
+ written in order to suit the task of parsing dramas
192
+ from both GerDraCor and DTA (Table 1).
193
+ 1Stages and sets are texts describing the setting (decora-
194
+ tions, position of characters) or commenting on characters’
195
+ actions and manner of speech.
196
+ 2https://tei-c.org/
197
+
198
+ Method
199
+ Parameters
200
+ Functionality
201
+ __init__
202
+ output: the empty dictionary that is filled with the
203
+ data from processed XML file
204
+ - initializes instant variables used for the XML tags
205
+ and processed text
206
+ - assigns the empty “output” dictionary to the in-
207
+ stance variable
208
+ startElement
209
+ xml_tag: the start xml-tag (of the <tag> form) which
210
+ is passed to the method from the file
211
+ - stores xml-tag and its attributes in instance variables
212
+ attrs: attributes of the tag
213
+ endElement
214
+ xml_tag: the end xml-tag (of the </tag> form) which
215
+ is passed to the method from the file
216
+ - stores the text processed between start and end tags
217
+ into a specific instance variable
218
+ characters
219
+ content: the text between start and end xml-tags
220
+ - processes the text by skipping empty lines, tokeniz-
221
+ ing text into words at spaces
222
+ - normalizes words spelling if needed (in GerDraCor
223
+ only)
224
+ - stores processed words by adding them into a list
225
+ Table 1: XMLHandler Class Structure
226
+ The tag passed to “startElement” and “endEle-
227
+ ment” defined how the content between tags should
228
+ be stored. For example, if “startElement” read
229
+ <TEI> tag, then the value of the “xml:id” tag was
230
+ stored from that as drama id; if a tag “</text> was
231
+ passed to the “endElement”, then it signaled of
232
+ the end of the drama, and stored all the previously
233
+ parsed text in a dictionary under the drama id as a
234
+ key. The text itself was the content read and written
235
+ in “characters” method and could be the speech of
236
+ a particular character between specific opening and
237
+ closing “speech tags”, or, similarly, a description
238
+ of a stage or a set. Additionally, inside “charac-
239
+ ters”, text was orthographically normalized: histor-
240
+ ical spelling of words was replaced with modern
241
+ spelling, which was looked up in a file containing
242
+ obsolete-modern spelling pairs and was produced
243
+ earlier with a File Comparator (described in detail
244
+ in Section 3.3). That was done for GerDraCor ex-
245
+ clusively, as DTA already contained normalized
246
+ versions of dramas. In general, XMLHandler was
247
+ designed to go through each drama, and extract
248
+ all the drama text, excluding the front page and
249
+ the cast list. Further, parsed dramas were conse-
250
+ quently written into a single text file. In order to
251
+ separate dramas and their parts from each other,
252
+ specific tags were introduced: “$” as opening tag
253
+ and “@” as a closing tag, which were followed by
254
+ the attribute name or value without a blank space.
255
+ For example, at the start/end of each drama a line
256
+ with an opening/closing tag and drama id was writ-
257
+ ten (e.g., “$id_ ger000569” at the beginning and
258
+ “@id_ger000569” at the end) (Table 2).
259
+ The function for writing parsed drama allowed
260
+ to produce two different outputs: dramas with the
261
+ whole text parsed or only characters’ speeches (sep-
262
+ arated by scenes as well) without sets or stages.
263
+ Eventually, the latter version was used for the fur-
264
+ ther model training. Figure 1 shows an example of
265
+ a drama parsed from GerDraCor with characters’
266
+ speeches alone.
267
+ $id_ger000066
268
+ ... a
269
+ $scene
270
+ b
271
+ $sp_#dalton
272
+ Ein abscheuliches Unglück – ich kann es nicht
273
+ erzählen – dieser Tag ist der letzte dieses
274
+ Hauses.
275
+ @sp_#dalton
276
+ $sp_#frau_von_wichmann
277
+ Dalton – ist es –
278
+ @sp_#frau_von_wichmann
279
+ $sp_#dalton
280
+ Belmont –
281
+ @sp_#dalton
282
+ $sp_#frau_von_wichmann
283
+ Ach – lebt meine arme Julie noch?
284
+ @sp_#frau_von_wichmann
285
+ ...
286
+ @scene
287
+ ...
288
+ @id_ger000066
289
+ a ”. . . ” replaces the text skipped in this example.
290
+ b Blank lines are added for the convenience of reading the
291
+ example.
292
+ Figure 1: A Shortened Example of a Drama Parsed
293
+ Only with Speeches
294
+
295
+ Attribute name
296
+ Text following the “$” or “@” tag
297
+ Text enclosed between tags
298
+ Example of opening/closing tag
299
+ Drama id
300
+ id_dramaid
301
+ Parsed drama
302
+ $id_ger000569 / @id_ger000569
303
+ Set / stagea
304
+ A set / a stage
305
+ $/@
306
+ Scene/actb
307
+ scene
308
+ A scene / an act
309
+ $scene / @scene
310
+ Speaker id
311
+ sp_#speakername
312
+ A speech of a particular character
313
+ $sp_#detlev / @sp_#detlev
314
+ a There was no text following “$” and “@” signs for sets and stage, and the text was enclosed just between those signs.
315
+ b 126 dramas in GerDraCor and 15 dramas in DTA did not contain scenes and were separated by acts or equivalent text
316
+ delimiters, which were marked with a “scene” tag.
317
+ Table 2: Tags Used in Parsed Dramas with Examples
318
+ transliterated
319
+ Hinweg
320
+ sie
321
+ nah’n
322
+ Dort
323
+ sind
324
+ wir
325
+ sicher
326
+ normalized
327
+ Hinweg
328
+ sie
329
+ nah
330
+ ‘n
331
+ Dort
332
+ sind
333
+ wir
334
+ sicher
335
+ Table 3: Example of Erroneously Added Blank Space After Normalization
336
+ 3.3
337
+ File Comparator
338
+ Since it was undesirable for generated dramas to
339
+ contain antiquated spellings and characters, the
340
+ version of DTA texts used for training the model
341
+ was the normalized version offered by the resource.
342
+ GerDraCor did not offer normalized versions of
343
+ their drama texts, though. To mitigate the influence
344
+ of historical spelling on the training of the model,
345
+ an effort was made to normalize GerDraCor texts
346
+ by using DTA texts.
347
+ The DTA offers different versions of each of
348
+ their drama texts, two of which were important for
349
+ the File Comparator.
350
+ 1. transliterated: A character-normalized ver-
351
+ sion with transliterated orthography. Given
352
+ the age of many of the dramas, the original
353
+ texts included characters outside the Latin-
354
+ 1 encoding, as for example the ’langes s’
355
+ (U+017F) or the elevated ’e’(U+0364) for
356
+ marking umlauts.
357
+ 2. normalized: A version standardized with
358
+ regard to spelling, as well as transliterated
359
+ orthography.
360
+ Historical spellings such as
361
+ "Erk
362
+ eandtnuß." and "weißheyt" are transferred
363
+ to their modern equivalents "Erkenntnis" and
364
+ "Weisheit".
365
+ Therefore, a collection of word pairs was created,
366
+ by comparing the transliterated and the normalized
367
+ versions of the DTA drama texts (Table 4). Punc-
368
+ tuation and other unwanted characters (e.g., “%”,
369
+ “(“, “/”) were cleaned from the strings before com-
370
+ parison. Each word pair consists of the old spelling
371
+ of a word, as well as its modern equivalent. Using
372
+ this list of word pairs, words in GerDraCor with
373
+ the old spelling could be changed into their new
374
+ form.
375
+ Since the normalized version resolved hyphen-
376
+ ation at the page and line break and sometimes
377
+ replaced one word with two words, or connected
378
+ two words into one, the word pairs could not be col-
379
+ lected by simply comparing each line word by word
380
+ in both version. Sometimes, it was indicated in the
381
+ DTA normalized version, if words were previously
382
+ merged (e.g., “wie_es” in the normalized version
383
+ corresponded to "wie’s" in the original text). How-
384
+ ever, such indication was not done consistently:
385
+ “thu’s” for example was normalized into "tu es"
386
+ without an underscore, and therefore, could be
387
+ treated by the algorithm as two words rather than a
388
+ single unit.
389
+ Issues like these could be easily solved by check-
390
+ ing for a specific pattern. The algorithm detects
391
+ words ending with “‘s” in the transliterated ver-
392
+ sion and tests whether the corresponding word in
393
+ the transliterated version is followed by an “es”,
394
+ and if this is the case, then the normalized ver-
395
+ sion likely contains two words (e.g., transliterated
396
+ “thu’s” is correctly paired with the normalized "tu
397
+ es"). But sometimes the normalized version added
398
+ spaces between words, which could not be pre-
399
+ dicted and caused wrong indexing, meaning two
400
+ different words in the line to be compared to each
401
+ other, as shown in the example in Table 3. Added
402
+ space in the normalized version (“nah ‘n”) causes
403
+ the algorithm to combine wrong words in pairs,
404
+ e.g., “Dort – ‘n”, meaning that “’n” is considered a
405
+ normalized version of “Dort”.
406
+ In order to exclude wrong pairs, where two
407
+ different words were treated as normalized and
408
+ transliterated versions of the same word, an al-
409
+ gorithm to compare the similarity of words was
410
+ implemented. If the normalized version was too
411
+ different from the transliterated version, the word
412
+ pair was considered faulty (consisting of two dif-
413
+
414
+ ferent words). Firstly, Levenshtein Distance was
415
+ used to find possibly faulty word pairs. With using
416
+ similarity threshold of 3, which appeared to be the
417
+ most optimal threshold, this method excluded 576
418
+ word pairs, but many of them seemed to be correct
419
+ edits of old spellings (Table 5).
420
+ For that reason, it was decided to try another
421
+ method and estimate word similarity in each pair
422
+ with the SequenceMatcher class from the “difflib”
423
+ module. SequenceMatcher uses “Gestalt Pattern
424
+ Matching” algorithm for string matching. In case,
425
+ similarity ratio between words in a pair was less
426
+ than 0.53, this word pair was deleted from a list
427
+ of transliterated-normalized pairs. As getting rid
428
+ of wrong pairs was the priority, the 0.5 threshold
429
+ allowed us to exclude as many as possible faulty
430
+ pairs at the cost of losing a few correct ones. Al-
431
+ though, this method excluded 712 pairs (more than
432
+ Levenshtein distance), more of them looked like
433
+ real faulty pairs (Table 6).
434
+ Thus, the final version of File Comparator nor-
435
+ malizes words by using word pairs left after exclud-
436
+ ing faulty word pairs with SequenceMatcher.
437
+ While parsing GerDraCor, if the word from
438
+ drama was found in the dictionary of word pairs, it
439
+ was lowered, changed to its normalized version and
440
+ restored with regards to its original capitalization.
441
+ Transliterated
442
+ Normalized
443
+ Ueberraschungen
444
+ Überraschungen
445
+ Medicinerei
446
+ Medizinerei
447
+ practicieren
448
+ praktizieren
449
+ Caffeegeschirr
450
+ Kaffeegeschirr
451
+ Cigarettentasche
452
+ Zigarettentasche
453
+ Hausflurthür
454
+ Hausflurtür
455
+ Nachtheil
456
+ Nachteil
457
+ Legirung
458
+ Legierung
459
+ legirt
460
+ legiert
461
+ Gratulire
462
+ Gratuliere
463
+ nothwendigerweise
464
+ notwendigerweise
465
+ adressirt
466
+ adressiert
467
+ cuvertiert
468
+ kuvertiert
469
+ todtgeboren
470
+ totgeboren
471
+ Table 4: Examples of Pairs Collected from Transliter-
472
+ ated and Normalized Versions of DTA Drama Texts
473
+ 4
474
+ The Proposed Approach
475
+ Inspired by the two-stage story generation ap-
476
+ proaches employed by (Fan et al., 2018; Yao et al.,
477
+ 2018), we also decided to divide the drama scene
478
+ generation process into two stages. However, while
479
+ 3Ratio varies from 0 to 1, where 0 means no commonalities
480
+ and 1 means identical strings.
481
+ Transliterated
482
+ Normalized
483
+ Wohlhäbige
484
+ Wohlhabende
485
+ Verlaubst
486
+ Laubest
487
+ Thu’s
488
+ tue es
489
+ daß’s
490
+ dass es
491
+ hoamgangen
492
+ heimgegangen
493
+ Zen
494
+ Zähne
495
+ veracht’
496
+ Acht
497
+ Table 5:
498
+ Examples of Word Pairs Excluded After
499
+ Checking for Faulty Word Pairs with the Levenshtein
500
+ Distance Algorithm
501
+ Transliterated
502
+ Normalized
503
+ Hizt
504
+ Jetzt
505
+ nachi
506
+ nage
507
+ itz
508
+ Jets
509
+ Creyß
510
+ Kreis
511
+ Flick
512
+ Flügge
513
+ Vehd
514
+ Fett
515
+ dy
516
+ die
517
+ Table 6:
518
+ Examples of Word Pairs Excluded After
519
+ Checking for Faulty Word Pairs with the Sequence-
520
+ Matcher Algorithm
521
+ Fan et al. first generate a storyline, which is subse-
522
+ quently used as input to the model that generates
523
+ the story, we train a model to produce outlines,
524
+ which become part of the input prompt in the sec-
525
+ ond stage. Likewise, our approach is different from
526
+ Yao et al.’s in that it uses just 10 keywords instead
527
+ of one keyword per sentence in the story. With this
528
+ approach, we aim to guide the generation process
529
+ of the model by providing it with the keywords sum-
530
+ marizing the most important parts of each scene.
531
+ Our second goal is to reduce the workload of the
532
+ user by allowing them to provide only 10 keywords
533
+ and let the hierarchical model do the rest of the
534
+ work.
535
+ First, we fine-tune a GPT-2 model (the outline
536
+ model) to generate outlines of scenes based on an
537
+ input of keywords extracted from the text. In the
538
+ second step, we fine-tune a second model (the gen-
539
+ eration model) to generate scenes based on input
540
+ which consists of the outline of the scene, a sum-
541
+ mary of the remote context as well as that of the
542
+ local context.
543
+ 4.1
544
+ GPT-2
545
+ GPT-2 (Radford et al., 2019) has been demon-
546
+ strated to achieve state-of-the-art results in a range
547
+ of NLP tasks such as natural language inference,
548
+ semantic similarity, text classification as well as
549
+ question answering. Moreover, GPT-2 has success-
550
+ fully been used for story generation (Wang et al.,
551
+
552
+ 2020; See et al., 2019).
553
+ GPT-2, introduced by Radford et al., is an auto-
554
+ regressive transformer consisting of 12, 24, 36
555
+ or 48 decoder blocks, depending on the size of
556
+ the model. In contrast to BERT (Devlin et al.,
557
+ 2018), which consists of encoder blocks only, GPT-
558
+ 2 stacks decoder blocks. Furthermore, an important
559
+ property of GPT-2 is its autoregressivity, i.e. the
560
+ model conditions the next token on the previous
561
+ token thus allowing text generation.
562
+ According to Radford et al., an additional key
563
+ feature of GPT-2 is its ability to learn a downstream
564
+ task in a zero-shot manner, i.e. without any need
565
+ for parameter tweaking or modifications to the ar-
566
+ chitecture of the model.
567
+ GPT-2 was trained with a slightly modified lan-
568
+ guage modeling objective: instead of estimating the
569
+ conditional distribution P(output|input), GPT-2
570
+ estimates P(output|input, task). But, instead of
571
+ separately modeling this at the architectural level,
572
+ the task can be prepended to the input sequence.
573
+ As there is no official GPT2 model for Ger-
574
+ man, we use the German GPT2 model4 uploaded
575
+ to Huggingface. It uses the 12-block setting, result-
576
+ ing in a 117M parameter model. The model was
577
+ trained on a 16GB and 2,350,234,427 tokens data
578
+ set consisting of data from the Wikipedia dump, EU
579
+ Bookshop corpus, Open Subtitles, CommonCrawl,
580
+ ParaCrawl and News Crawl.
581
+ 4.2
582
+ Pre-processing & Train/Dev/Test Split
583
+ First, we pre-process the Dracor dataset, generating
584
+ training instances needed for training both models.
585
+ As both the outline and the generation models use
586
+ scenes and gold standard outlines as input, we gen-
587
+ erate those first.
588
+ For both scenes and outlines we create two ver-
589
+ sions: one with speakers left in the text and one
590
+ without speakers. The first version serves as in-
591
+ put to both models, while the latter is only used
592
+ once during the keyword extraction process. In the
593
+ first version, each utterance starts with a <speaker
594
+ name:> and is followed by a newline character,
595
+ so that the actual utterance is on a separate line.
596
+ For the version without speakers, we simply make
597
+ sure each utterance is on a separate line. For sen-
598
+ tence boundary detection, we employ the NLTK
599
+ tokenizer for sentences from the NLTK Tokenizer
600
+ package 5.
601
+ 4https://huggingface.co/dbmdz/german-gpt2
602
+ 5https://www.nltk.org/api/nltk.tokenize.html
603
+ In addition, as there are no real outlines available
604
+ for the plays, we experiment with two summariza-
605
+ tion algorithms to get the gold standard outlines.
606
+ First, following Wang et al.’s approach we employ
607
+ TextRank, an extractive text summarization algo-
608
+ rithm, to extract the outlines from scenes. We also
609
+ try abstractive summarization with a BERT2BERT
610
+ model6 trained on MLSUM, a dataset of 1.5M on-
611
+ line news articles. Upon inspection, we found that
612
+ the BERT2BERT model’s output was unsatisfac-
613
+ tory: most of the time the summary consisted of 2-3
614
+ sentences and was often truncated. Furthermore,
615
+ as the format of a play presupposes some form of
616
+ a dialogue, it is quite different from that of a nor-
617
+ mal text written in prose. We hypothesize that the
618
+ strange output of the model is due to it having been
619
+ trained on news articles. Thus, we proceed with
620
+ utilizing the TextRank algorithm for outline gen-
621
+ eration. Prior to performing summarization with
622
+ TextRank, we remove the speakers, and add them
623
+ back in to each sentence in the outline.
624
+ 4.3
625
+ The Outline Generation Model
626
+ As the data set we use does not have gold standard
627
+ outlines, we decided to follow Wang et al.’s ap-
628
+ proach, in which they use Textrank (add citation to
629
+ extract the outline of the story (or the scene in our
630
+ case). We then utilize these outlines as the ground
631
+ truth output for our model. As input to the outline
632
+ model, we use keywords extracted from the scenes
633
+ and their outlines.
634
+ 4.3.1
635
+ Keyword extraction
636
+ In the search for a keyword extraction algorithm
637
+ which could yield a good set of keywords for each
638
+ scene/outline, we have experimented with 6 differ-
639
+ ent algorithms: Yake (Campos et al., 2020), Rake
640
+ (Rose et al., 2010), MultiRake 7, KeyBert (Grooten-
641
+ dorst, 2020), TextRank(Mihalcea and Tarau, 2004)
642
+ and tf-idf.
643
+ Keyword Extraction Algorithms
644
+ RAKE first
645
+ generates a set of candidate keywords for the doc-
646
+ ument subsequently creating a co-occurrence ma-
647
+ trix from those. In the next step, for each can-
648
+ didate a score, defined as the sum of its member
649
+ word scores, is calculated. The word scores are
650
+ calculated using word frequency (freq(w)), word
651
+ degree (deg(w)),and (3) ratio of degree to frequency
652
+ (deg(w)/freq(w)).
653
+ 6https://huggingface.co/mrm8488/bert2bert_shared-
654
+ german-finetuned-summarization
655
+ 7https://pypi.org/project/multi-rake/
656
+
657
+ MultiRake is simply the multilingual version of
658
+ the RAKE algorithm which has some additional pa-
659
+ rameters such the addition of one’s own stopwords
660
+ or the possibility to vary the length and number of
661
+ keywords.
662
+ KeyBert is based on creating BERT embeddings
663
+ for both the individual tokens in a document as well
664
+ as the document itself. Then, the cosine similarity
665
+ of the embedding of each word and the document in
666
+ which the word appears is calculated. Those words
667
+ that have the highest cosine similarity with the doc-
668
+ ument embedding are identified as the keywords of
669
+ the document.
670
+ TextRank is a graph-based ranking model which
671
+ takes into account the co-occurrence of words in a
672
+ window of N words, adding edges between those
673
+ nodes and then applying applying a ranking algo-
674
+ rithm until convergence.
675
+ In contrast to the algorithms mentioned above,
676
+ tf-idf not only quantifies the importance of a term
677
+ to a specific document in a collection of documents
678
+ but also off-setts it by the number of occurrences
679
+ of this term in other documents in the set. This al-
680
+ lows to mitigate the effect of highly frequent terms
681
+ occurring in a large number of documents on the
682
+ final score.
683
+ tf(t, d) =
684
+ f(t, d)
685
+
686
+ t′∈d
687
+ f(t′, d)
688
+ (1)
689
+ YAKE differs from the other algorithms in that
690
+ it relies on a set of features which are supposed
691
+ to characterize each term. These include casing,
692
+ the position of the word in the document, word fre-
693
+ quency, word relatedness to context and frequency
694
+ of word in different sentences. Finally, these fea-
695
+ tures are combined into a single score which repre-
696
+ sents the word (Sw).
697
+ S(kw) =
698
+
699
+ w∈kw S(w)
700
+ TF(kw) ∗ (1 + �
701
+ w∈kw S(w))
702
+ (2)
703
+ Algorithm Comparision
704
+ In order to select the
705
+ most suitable algorithm for this task, we performed
706
+ a qualitative evaluation of the keyword extraction
707
+ results. We used a small set of 5 randomly chosen
708
+ scenes. Upon inspection of the extracted keywords,
709
+ we observed that only the keywords obtained us-
710
+ ing tf-idf and TextRank actually yielded acceptable
711
+ results. For example, Rake, MultiRake and YAKE
712
+ return quite a few repeating keyword or keywords
713
+ or keywords that differ only in the grammatical
714
+ case. Furthermore, some keywords were simply
715
+ a concatenation of neighboring tokens which do
716
+ not make much sense when put together, especially
717
+ if the preceding tokens are missing. In addition,
718
+ RAKE and MultiRAKE return lowercased version
719
+ of the keywords, which can be problematic for Ger-
720
+ man text, as casing signals the POS of a word and
721
+ thus serves an important function, distinguishing
722
+ nouns from other parts of speech. As GPT-2 uses
723
+ byte-pair-encoding, the starting vocabulary, i.e. the
724
+ set of all individual characters, consists of both
725
+ lower and upper case characters. This means that
726
+ when the BPE algorithm learns to merge adjacent
727
+ characters, it treats AB and ab as different tokens.
728
+ In light of our observations, we decided to ex-
729
+ tract keywords using tf-idf and TextRank and train
730
+ two outline models.
731
+ Keyword extraction
732
+ As a large number of
733
+ scenes are quite long and the keyword extraction al-
734
+ gorithms often return phrases that are only uttered
735
+ once by the speaker, we decided to try out keyword
736
+ extraction from both whole scenes and outlines of
737
+ scenes. We have noticed that keywords extracted
738
+ from outlines are often more relevant to the outline.
739
+ As a result, our models are trained on keywords
740
+ extracted from outlines, where the outline version
741
+ is that without speakers.
742
+ Another important parameter for our keywords
743
+ input is the number of keywords (k) to be extracted
744
+ from the scenes. Our experiments have shown that
745
+ when k > 10, many of the terms in the lower half
746
+ of the keyword list are extremely random and unre-
747
+ lated to the outline. As a result, we chose k=10 for
748
+ both tf-idf and TextRank.
749
+ Tf-idf
750
+ Despite using existing implementations of
751
+ tf-idf 8 and TextRank 9, we had to apply some pre-
752
+ processing steps. In the case of tf-idf, we first apply
753
+ a SpaCy10 POS tagger with the de_core_news_sm
754
+ German model in order to exclude auxiliary verbs,
755
+ particles, adpositions and adverbs. In addition, any
756
+ tokens appearing in NLTK’s stopword list for Ger-
757
+ man are dropped.
758
+ TextRank
759
+ Similarly, we only keep keywords that
760
+ are not part of the list of German stopwords. In
761
+ addition, as TextRank extracts sequences of tokens,
762
+ not individual tokens, repetitions containing tokens
763
+ 8https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.
764
+ feature_extraction.text.TfidfVectorizer.html
765
+ 9https://pypi.org/project/pytextrank/
766
+ 10https://spacy.io/
767
+
768
+ that only differ by grammatical case are inevitable.
769
+ In this case, we discard repeated keywords. For
770
+ instance, in the case of die gute Oma and der guten
771
+ Oma we only keep the lemmatized version of the
772
+ first occurrence of the keyword.
773
+ 4.3.2
774
+ Model training
775
+ To fine-tune the German GPT-2 model to produce
776
+ outlines given keywords as input, we concatenate
777
+ the keywords K and the corresponding outline O
778
+ extracted using TextRank and separate them with
779
+ the <SEP> token. In addition, the concatenated
780
+ sequence C is prepended with a <BOS> token and
781
+ a <EOS> token is attached to the end of the con-
782
+ catenated input.
783
+ The model is trained for 3 epochs with a training
784
+ batch size of 4 and a test batch size of 8. The
785
+ default optimizer AdamW is used and the number
786
+ of warm up steps for the learning rate scheduler is
787
+ set to 500. The model is evaluated every 400 steps.
788
+ During training, we compute the cross-entropy of
789
+ the tokens in C.
790
+ At test time, the model is fed the sequence
791
+ <BOS> + K + <SEP> and is expected to gener-
792
+ ate the outline tokens. Generation stops once the
793
+ <EOS> token is generated. We use top p sam-
794
+ pling, wherein the next token to be generated is
795
+ selected from the vocabulary items that make up
796
+ 70% (top_p=0.9) of the probability mass. In addi-
797
+ tion, repetition_penalty is set to 2.0.
798
+ As has been mentioned before, we have trained
799
+ two versions of the outline model (using the same
800
+ settings): one in which the keywords are extracted
801
+ using tf-idf and the other using TextRank. The two
802
+ models are evaluated with respect to their perfor-
803
+ mance on the downstream task of scene generation,
804
+ discussed in Section 5.2.
805
+ 4.4
806
+ The Generation Model
807
+ In the second part of our system, another fine-tuned
808
+ GPT-2 model is leveraged to generate a drama
809
+ scene from given start and outline. The genera-
810
+ tion model can be characterized by the following
811
+ three aspects:
812
+ 1. Iterative generation: As many drama scenes
813
+ are longer than the upper length limit of GPT
814
+ model (1024 tokens), it is not possible to gen-
815
+ erate a whole scene at once. Therefore, we
816
+ adopt an iterative generation strategy: in each
817
+ iteration, the model only generates 100 tokens,
818
+ and all generated tokens are then fed into a
819
+ summarizer to produce the prompt for next
820
+ iteration.
821
+ 2. Dynamic prompt: In our system, the prompt is
822
+ split into three individual parts: outline, sum-
823
+ mary of remote context and local context. The
824
+ outline is either drawn from the original play
825
+ or generated by the first part of the system,
826
+ and remains unchanged in all generative itera-
827
+ tion. When the outline and generated outputs
828
+ are longer than 924 tokens, only the nearest
829
+ 250 tokens are preserved, and the remote con-
830
+ text is summarized by a TextRank model. The
831
+ three parts are concatenated with a <SEP> to-
832
+ ken to form the prompt of each generation
833
+ step. In this way, our model can maintain
834
+ local coherency as well as memorizing impor-
835
+ tant information even if it is mentioned far
836
+ ahead of the current position. The introduc-
837
+ tion of outlines provides a guideline for the
838
+ plot and guarantees global consistency. Thus,
839
+ the model is provided with dynamic prompt
840
+ with different information in each iteration. A
841
+ figure describing the model structure can be
842
+ found below. (Figure ??)
843
+ Figure 2: Model architecture
844
+ 3. Automatic post-editing: Despite the improved
845
+ performance of our fine-tuned GPT-2 model,
846
+ it still fails to produce drama as human ex-
847
+ perts. This can be attributed to the inherent
848
+ difficulty of drama generation and the diverse
849
+ writing styles and formats of our collected
850
+ training corpora. To address some recurring
851
+ format problems, we apply a few automatic
852
+ post-editing methods. In particular, we have
853
+ resolved the following issues:
854
+ • Repetitiveness: As the input information is rel-
855
+ atively little at the beginning of generation, the
856
+ model tends to repeat sentences from prompt
857
+ or generated lines. To counter repetitiveness,
858
+
859
+ Output (100 tokens)
860
+ Fine-tunedGPT-2model
861
+ Local
862
+ <BOS>
863
+ Outline
864
+ <SEP>
865
+ Summary
866
+ <SEP>
867
+ <EOS>
868
+ contextwe set the repetition penalty to 1.01 and for-
869
+ bid repeated 4-grams during generation. We
870
+ also discard any new lines (excluding charac-
871
+ ter names) that have already been generated.
872
+ Since we have a strict penalty for repetition,
873
+ it can occur that the model cannot generate
874
+ a valid line in an iteration. To prevent these
875
+ cases, the model returns 10 sequences each
876
+ time for the post-editing module to select, and
877
+ it is backed off to generation without outline
878
+ when none of the 10 returns include any valid
879
+ lines.
880
+ • Bad character names: In most cases the model
881
+ is able to identify characters in the play and
882
+ continues the dialogue with their names. How-
883
+ ever, it sometimes misspells names or adds
884
+ new characters abruptly, which harms the plot
885
+ consistency. In our system we identify mis-
886
+ spelling by its edit distance from any given
887
+ character name. If the edit distance is small
888
+ (less than or equal to 2), it is considered as
889
+ misspelling and the wrong name is corrected
890
+ to a given character name. Otherwise, the new
891
+ name is seen as an invalid character and will
892
+ be removed along with its speech.
893
+ • Empty speeches: The model may output char-
894
+ acter names at the start of a new line but does
895
+ not assign any speech to them. We manage to
896
+ resolve this problem by identifying character
897
+ names followed immediately by another name
898
+ and discarding the lines.
899
+ 5
900
+ Experiments and Results
901
+ To study the effectiveness of our proposed ap-
902
+ proach, we compare our models with baseline GPT-
903
+ 2 models. In particular, we have two baseline mod-
904
+ els: a not fine-tuned GPT-2 model and a GPT-2
905
+ model fine-tuned on the same training set but with
906
+ no outline or summarization (-dynamic prompt).
907
+ All models are based on a German-language GPT-
908
+ 2 model named german-gpt2 from HuggingFace.11
909
+ For generation model training, we first extract
910
+ prompt-generated output pairs from collected cor-
911
+ pora and fine-tune our model on them. In particular,
912
+ the outline part in the prompt is extracted from the
913
+ original scene using TextRank. We run the training
914
+ for 3 epochs with a batch size of 8, evaluating on
915
+ the dev set every 400 steps. A default optimizer is
916
+ used with 500 warm-up steps and the checkpoint
917
+ with the lowest perplexity on dev set is chosen,
918
+ 11https://huggingface.co/dbmdz/german-gpt2
919
+ with an early stopping patience of 10. The fine-
920
+ tuned baseline model is trained on the raw drama
921
+ scripts directly with the same set of hyperparame-
922
+ ters as generation model training, except that it is
923
+ trained for 10 epochs, as there are fewer optimiza-
924
+ tion steps in each epoch compared to generation
925
+ model fine-tuning.
926
+ 5.1
927
+ Evaluation Metrics
928
+ To evaluate the performance of our approach, we
929
+ adopt several automatic quantitative evaluation met-
930
+ rics as well as a manual qualitative analysis. 100
931
+ scenes from test set are generated by each model
932
+ given start of the scene (approximately 100 tokens)
933
+ as well as an outline (approximately 200 tokens,
934
+ set to NULL for baseline models) and their perfor-
935
+ mance is measured and compared by the following
936
+ metrics.
937
+ • Average number of sentences per speech:
938
+ In general, drama is comprised of conversa-
939
+ tions, which means each character is supposed
940
+ to take turns to give their speeches. Thus, it
941
+ is important that the model should not gener-
942
+ ate a text where only one or two characters
943
+ give very long speeches. Average number
944
+ of sentences per speech is a metric reflecting
945
+ how well the generated plays resemble a hu-
946
+ man written play in format. Abnormally high
947
+ value in this metric indicate that model fails
948
+ to capture the format features of drama.
949
+ • Average sentence length: Average sentence
950
+ length is a simple yet effective measurement
951
+ of performance of generative models(Kincaid
952
+ et al., 1975; Roemmele et al., 2017). While
953
+ too long sentences might harm readability, too
954
+ short sentences are more likely to be incor-
955
+ rect or illogical in the context. In our experi-
956
+ ment, we compare the average sentence length
957
+ of generated texts to that of human written
958
+ scripts, to evaluate and compare how each
959
+ model performs in generating fluent and read-
960
+ able sentences.
961
+ • Perplexity: We also measure the perplexity
962
+ score of the generated scenes from each model
963
+ (including human written plays) using german-
964
+ gpt2. Perplexity is usually assigned by a to-
965
+ be-evaluated language model on a real text
966
+ (Jelinek et al., 1977), while in our case we
967
+ reverse the process and leverage a pre-trained
968
+ language model to evaluate the fluency and
969
+
970
+ Models
971
+ w/o fine-tuning
972
+ w/o outline
973
+ w extracted outline
974
+ w TextRank outline
975
+ w TF-IDF outline
976
+ Human
977
+ Sentences per speech
978
+ 64.74
979
+ 5.40
980
+ 4.47
981
+ 5.97
982
+ 6.04
983
+ 3.21
984
+ Sentence length
985
+ 4.60
986
+ 6.89
987
+ 6.16
988
+ 6.82
989
+ 6.60
990
+ 8.82
991
+ Perplexity
992
+ 20.58
993
+ 18.90
994
+ 19.18
995
+ 18.82
996
+ 19.46
997
+ 17.13
998
+ 1-gram overlap
999
+ 0.11
1000
+ 0.19
1001
+ 0.20
1002
+ 0.17
1003
+ 0.18
1004
+ 0.10
1005
+ 2-gram overlap
1006
+ 0.012
1007
+ 0.028
1008
+ 0.040
1009
+ 0.020
1010
+ 0.022
1011
+ 0.009
1012
+ 3-gram overlap
1013
+ 0.0007
1014
+ 0.0053
1015
+ 0.0109
1016
+ 0.0024
1017
+ 0.0032
1018
+ 0.0013
1019
+ Topic drift (2-gram)
1020
+ -8.33%
1021
+ 34.3%
1022
+ 18.2%
1023
+ 27.3%
1024
+ 42.3%
1025
+ 20.0%
1026
+ Topic drift (3-gram)
1027
+ 28.6%
1028
+ 66.3%
1029
+ 23.0%
1030
+ 34.6%
1031
+ 79.2%
1032
+ 57.1%
1033
+ Distinct-1
1034
+ 0.503
1035
+ 0.433
1036
+ 0.463
1037
+ 0.438
1038
+ 0.443
1039
+ 0.576
1040
+ Distinct-2
1041
+ 0.880
1042
+ 0.842
1043
+ 0.860
1044
+ 0.846
1045
+ 0.846
1046
+ 0.921
1047
+ Distinct-3
1048
+ 0.969
1049
+ 0.963
1050
+ 0.966
1051
+ 0.962
1052
+ 0.960
1053
+ 0.982
1054
+ Table 7: Automatic evaluation results on 100 test set.
1055
+ coherency of generated texts. In particular, to
1056
+ balance the evaluation efficiency and accuracy,
1057
+ we use a stride of 100. Lower perplexity score
1058
+ indicates better coherency.
1059
+ • N-gram overlap: For n=1,2,3, we measure
1060
+ the F1 score of n-gram overlap between the
1061
+ start of scene and generated text. Low value
1062
+ means lower similarity between the generated
1063
+ text and start of the scene.
1064
+ • Topic drift: In addition to n-gram overlap,
1065
+ we also calculate the overlap for the first half
1066
+ and second half of generated texts separately,
1067
+ and measure the proportion of decrease in F1
1068
+ as a metric for topic drift. We assume that, if
1069
+ a story is globally consistent, the topic drift
1070
+ should be relatively small, while a story lack-
1071
+ ing plot consistency tends to have larger topic
1072
+ drift.
1073
+ • Distinct-n: To examine the model’s ability of
1074
+ producing diverse words and phrases, we also
1075
+ compute the average proportion of unique n-
1076
+ gram in the whole generated text (Li et al.,
1077
+ 2015). Higher proportion of unique n-grams
1078
+ reflects that the model is highly capable of
1079
+ generating unseen words or phrases, either by
1080
+ rephrasing existing expressions or introducing
1081
+ new contents.
1082
+ 5.2
1083
+ Quantitative Results
1084
+ Table 7 shows the results of our automatic evalu-
1085
+ ation. It is obvious that the model without fine-
1086
+ tuning fails to produce texts that are formally sim-
1087
+ ilar to drama: each speech consists of on average
1088
+ 64.74 sentences and each sentence is composed
1089
+ of only 4.6 words, indicating it just start a speech
1090
+ randomly and many sentences are only one phrase
1091
+ or even one word. For this reason, it will not be
1092
+ analyzed later in this section. All other models
1093
+ perform reasonably well in average number of sen-
1094
+ tences per speech. The human-written scripts have
1095
+ the lowest value.
1096
+ Similar patterns can be observed in average sen-
1097
+ tence length and perplexity. Human-written scripts
1098
+ demonstrate the best readability and coherency.
1099
+ Among the machine generation approaches, despite
1100
+ the gap being trivial, the model with no outline
1101
+ and the model with outline generated by keywords
1102
+ (TextRank) display superiority to the model with
1103
+ extracted outlines in terms of fluency.
1104
+ When it comes to n-gram overlap, the model
1105
+ with extracted outlines has by far the highest over-
1106
+ lap with the given start of the scene, followed by the
1107
+ model with no outlines. The models with generated
1108
+ outlines do not reach a decent result, probably be-
1109
+ cause of the poorer quality of outlines. It is worth
1110
+ mentioning that the real drama scripts have the
1111
+ lowest overlap score. We attribute this to the out-
1112
+ standing ability of human experts of rephrasing and
1113
+ controlling the flow of plot, thus it is not directly
1114
+ comparable to machine generation approaches.
1115
+ Besides, we notice that introducing extra out-
1116
+ line information indeed contributes to a better
1117
+ global consistency: models using both extracted
1118
+ outlines and outlines generated by TextRank key-
1119
+ words show competitive or even better performance
1120
+ than the human-written plays in topic drift, while
1121
+ model that do not leverage such information suffer
1122
+ severely from topic drift.
1123
+ Finally, no significant difference is observed in
1124
+ the ability of using diverse vocabulary among ma-
1125
+ chine generation models. Human playwrights, as
1126
+ we have expected, show their irreplaceable advan-
1127
+ tage in diction.
1128
+ 5.3
1129
+ Qualitative Analysis
1130
+ 5.3.1
1131
+ Qualitative Evaluation of Outlines
1132
+ Firstly, in most of the cases, only the first line of the
1133
+ outline contains a speaker. Naturally, this makes
1134
+
1135
+ it impossible for the subsequent generation model
1136
+ not to come up with random characters that do not
1137
+ appear in the outline. Furthermore, after the first
1138
+ couple of sentences, the generated outline quite
1139
+ often consists of direct speech followed by a report-
1140
+ ing clause (i.e. "sagte der Mann" - "a man said",
1141
+ "fragte er" - "he said"), as can be seen in both gener-
1142
+ ated outlines in Table A1 in the Appendix. This is
1143
+ quite surprising, considering that the gold standard
1144
+ outlines do not contain any such text, as all of the
1145
+ drama pieces are in dialogue format. A possible
1146
+ explanation for this could be that the amount of
1147
+ drama texts used for training is insignificant com-
1148
+ pared to the large amounts of news data the model
1149
+ was pre-trained on.
1150
+ 5.3.2
1151
+ Qualitative Evaluation of drama texts
1152
+ Manual evaluation reveals that none of the models
1153
+ were able to produce coherent and meaningful texts.
1154
+ On average the texts created by the model with no
1155
+ outline are shorter compared to the texts from other
1156
+ models, which mostly end after a maximum itera-
1157
+ tion number is reached. Though all of the models
1158
+ produced texts that ended with the repetition of
1159
+ mildly changed words or phrases, the model using
1160
+ an extracted outline did so more frequently. This
1161
+ can be seen quite well in the generated example
1162
+ text found in Table A2 Part 3/3 given in the ap-
1163
+ pendix and might explain the extremely low topic
1164
+ drift values for this model. The two models using
1165
+ generated outlines did not introduce as many new
1166
+ characters and did not switch between speakers as
1167
+ often as the other two models, creating mostly long
1168
+ monologues instead of dialogues. All of the models
1169
+ overused ’»’ and ’«’ in normal dialog and started
1170
+ a lot of sentences with a hyphen. Since this is a
1171
+ problem occurring in all of the models, it can be
1172
+ assumed that the varying formalization across dif-
1173
+ ferent dramas used in the training process caused
1174
+ this issue. In multiple drama texts two or more fol-
1175
+ lowing hyphen were used to mark pauses in speech.
1176
+ One example of an excessive use of hyphen in the
1177
+ original drama texts can be found in the excerpt
1178
+ from ’Die Pietisterey im Fischbein-Rocke’ given
1179
+ in Figure A1 in the appendix. The models tend to
1180
+ overuse hyphens in a way, that hinders meaningful
1181
+ text generation instead.
1182
+ 6
1183
+ Discussion and Outlook
1184
+ Our proposed method described above is able to
1185
+ handle some known issues like lack of global infor-
1186
+ mation. However, drama generation/completion is
1187
+ a challenging task even for human experts, and in
1188
+ our work, there are still some problems remaining
1189
+ unresolved:
1190
+ 1. Abrupt ending: Although a special token
1191
+ <endoftext> is added to the end of each scene
1192
+ and used for training, we notice that in most
1193
+ cases the generation only stops when a max-
1194
+ imum iteration number is reached. This will
1195
+ lead to an abrupt ending problem. A better
1196
+ method should be explored to provide more
1197
+ control over the story ending without dramati-
1198
+ cally harming the conciseness of drama.
1199
+ 2. Non-uniform format: Despite an extra post-
1200
+ editing process during generation, some in-
1201
+ consistency in format is still not completely
1202
+ avoided. Some bad names are not detected as
1203
+ well and are thus kept in the text and compro-
1204
+ mise readability.
1205
+ 3. Instability: While some previous works (Rosa
1206
+ et al., 2020, 2021) rely on manual interven-
1207
+ tion to detect and prevent unsatisfactory gen-
1208
+ eration results, we decided to adopt a more
1209
+ convenient fully automatic approach, which
1210
+ inevitably induces accumulated errors and re-
1211
+ sults in instability in generation.
1212
+ 4. Incompetence of generating a whole play: The
1213
+ proposed model can only generate one scene
1214
+ at a time and cannot produce a whole play. Fu-
1215
+ ture work can focus on this more challenging
1216
+ task, for example by introducing an additional
1217
+ layer to the hierarchy, aiming to generate out-
1218
+ lines for each scene based on a outline of the
1219
+ whole play and summary of previous scenes.
1220
+ 7
1221
+ Conclusion
1222
+ This paper compares the quantitative results of dif-
1223
+ ferent models attempting the generation of German
1224
+ drama texts. Furthermore it explores the oppor-
1225
+ tunity of generating German drama texts with ex-
1226
+ tracted outlines. While the quantitative results of
1227
+ the models suggested sensible outcomes, qualita-
1228
+ tive analysis of the generated texts found them to
1229
+ be lacking in regards of coherency, meaning and
1230
+ form. A lot of issues can be hypothesized to stem
1231
+ from the varying formalization in the drama texts
1232
+ used in the training of the models and the poor qual-
1233
+ ity of the generated outlines. A bigger and cleaner
1234
+ dataset of German drama texts would be desirable
1235
+ for further testing of generational models.
1236
+
1237
+ References
1238
+ Amal Alabdulkarim, Siyan Li, and Xiangyu Peng.
1239
+ 2021. Automatic story generation: Challenges and
1240
+ attempts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.12634.
1241
+ Arwa I Alhussain and Aqil M Azmi. 2021. Automatic
1242
+ story generation: a survey of approaches.
1243
+ ACM
1244
+ Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(5):1–38.
1245
+ Ricardo Campos, Vítor Mangaravite, Arian Pasquali,
1246
+ Alípio Jorge, Célia Nunes, and Adam Jatowt. 2020.
1247
+ Yake! keyword extraction from single documents
1248
+ using multiple local features. Information Sciences,
1249
+ 509:257–289.
1250
+ Yun-Gyung Cheong and R Michael Young. 2014. Sus-
1251
+ penser:
1252
+ A story generation system for suspense.
1253
+ IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence
1254
+ and AI in Games, 7(1):39–52.
1255
+ Deutsches Textarchiv. 2022.
1256
+ Grundlage für ein
1257
+ Referenzkorpus
1258
+ der
1259
+ neuhochdeutschen
1260
+ Sprache.
1261
+ Herausgegeben von der Berlin-Brandenburgischen
1262
+ Akademie
1263
+ der
1264
+ Wissenschaften,
1265
+ Berlin.
1266
+ URL:
1267
+ https://www.deutschestextarchiv.de/. [link].
1268
+ Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and
1269
+ Kristina Toutanova. 2018.
1270
+ BERT: pre-training of
1271
+ deep bidirectional transformers for language under-
1272
+ standing. CoRR, abs/1810.04805.
1273
+ Angela Fan, Mike Lewis, and Yann Dauphin. 2018. Hi-
1274
+ erarchical neural story generation. In Proceedings
1275
+ of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for
1276
+ Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers),
1277
+ pages 889–898, Melbourne, Australia. Association
1278
+ for Computational Linguistics.
1279
+ Angela Fan, Mike Lewis, and Yann Dauphin. 2019.
1280
+ Strategies for structuring story generation.
1281
+ arXiv
1282
+ preprint arXiv:1902.01109.
1283
+ Frank Fischer, Ingo Börner, Mathias Göbel, Ange-
1284
+ lika Hechtl, Christopher Kittel, Carsten Milling, and
1285
+ Peer Trilcke. 2019. Programmable corpora: Intro-
1286
+ ducing DraCor, an infrastructure for the research on
1287
+ european drama. Publisher: Zenodo.
1288
+ Neil M Goldman. 1974. Computer generation of nat-
1289
+ ural language from a deep conceptual base. Techni-
1290
+ cal report, STANFORD UNIV CA DEPT OF COM-
1291
+ PUTER SCIENCE.
1292
+ Maarten Grootendorst. 2020. Keybert: Minimal key-
1293
+ word extraction with bert.
1294
+ Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997.
1295
+ Long short-term memory.
1296
+ Neural computation,
1297
+ 9(8):1735–1780.
1298
+ Fred Jelinek, Robert L Mercer, Lalit R Bahl, and
1299
+ James K Baker. 1977. Perplexity—a measure of the
1300
+ difficulty of speech recognition tasks. The Journal
1301
+ of the Acoustical Society of America, 62(S1):S63–
1302
+ S63.
1303
+ J Peter Kincaid, Robert P Fishburne Jr, Richard L
1304
+ Rogers, and Brad S Chissom. 1975. Derivation of
1305
+ new readability formulas (automated readability in-
1306
+ dex, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for
1307
+ navy enlisted personnel.
1308
+ Technical report, Naval
1309
+ Technical Training Command Millington TN Re-
1310
+ search Branch.
1311
+ Stefanie Lethbridge and Jarmila Mildorf. 2004. Basics
1312
+ of english studies: An introductory course for stu-
1313
+ dents of literary studies in english. Tübingen: Uni-
1314
+ versity of Tübingen.
1315
+ Jiwei Li, Michel Galley, Chris Brockett, Jianfeng Gao,
1316
+ and Bill Dolan. 2015. A diversity-promoting objec-
1317
+ tive function for neural conversation models. arXiv
1318
+ preprint arXiv:1510.03055.
1319
+ Ling Liu and M Tamer Özsu. 2009. Encyclopedia of
1320
+ database systems, volume 6. Springer.
1321
+ Rada Mihalcea and Paul Tarau. 2004.
1322
+ TextRank:
1323
+ Bringing order into text. In Proceedings of the 2004
1324
+ Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Lan-
1325
+ guage Processing, pages 404–411, Barcelona, Spain.
1326
+ Association for Computational Linguistics.
1327
+ Nanyun Peng, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Jonathan May,
1328
+ and Kevin Knight. 2018. Towards controllable story
1329
+ generation. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on
1330
+ Storytelling, pages 43–49.
1331
+ Alec Radford, Jeff Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan,
1332
+ Dario Amodei, and Ilya Sutskever. 2019. Language
1333
+ models are unsupervised multitask learners.
1334
+ Melissa Roemmele, Andrew S Gordon, and Reid Swan-
1335
+ son. 2017. Evaluating story generation systems us-
1336
+ ing automated linguistic analyses.
1337
+ Technical re-
1338
+ port, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFOR-
1339
+ NIA LOS ANGELES.
1340
+ Rudolf Rosa, Ondrej Dusek, Tom Kocmi, David Mare-
1341
+ cek, Tomás Musil, Patrícia Schmidtová, Dominik
1342
+ Jurko, Ondrej Bojar, Daniel Hrbek, David Kosták,
1343
+ Martina Kinská, Josef Dolezal, and Klára Vosecká.
1344
+ 2020. Theaitre: Artificial intelligence to write a the-
1345
+ atre play. CoRR, abs/2006.14668.
1346
+ Rudolf Rosa, Tomás Musil, Ondrej Dusek, Dominik Ju-
1347
+ rko, Patrícia Schmidtová, David Marecek, Ondrej
1348
+ Bojar, Tom Kocmi, Daniel Hrbek, David Kosták,
1349
+ Martina Kinská, Marie Nováková, Josef Dolezal,
1350
+ Klára Vosecká, Tomás Studeník, and Petr Zabka.
1351
+ 2021. Theaitre 1.0: Interactive generation of theatre
1352
+ play scripts. CoRR, abs/2102.08892.
1353
+ Stuart Rose, Dave Engel, Nick Cramer, and Wendy
1354
+ Cowley. 2010. Automatic Keyword Extraction from
1355
+ Individual Documents, pages 1 – 20.
1356
+ David E Rumelhart, Geoffrey E Hinton, and Ronald J
1357
+ Williams. 1986. Learning representations by back-
1358
+ propagating errors. nature, 323(6088):533–536.
1359
+
1360
+ Abigail See, Aneesh Pappu, Rohun Saxena, Akhila
1361
+ Yerukola, and Christopher D. Manning. 2019. Do
1362
+ massively pretrained language models make better
1363
+ storytellers?
1364
+ In Proceedings of the 23rd Confer-
1365
+ ence on Computational Natural Language Learning
1366
+ (CoNLL), pages 843–861, Hong Kong, China. Asso-
1367
+ ciation for Computational Linguistics.
1368
+ Wei Wang, Piji Li, and Hai-Tao Zheng. 2020.
1369
+ Con-
1370
+ sistency and coherency enhanced story generation.
1371
+ CoRR, abs/2010.08822.
1372
+ Lili Yao, Nanyun Peng, Ralph M. Weischedel, Kevin
1373
+ Knight, Dongyan Zhao, and Rui Yan. 2018. Plan-
1374
+ and-write:
1375
+ Towards better automatic storytelling.
1376
+ CoRR, abs/1811.05701.
1377
+
1378
+ A
1379
+ Appendix
1380
+ id
1381
+ model
1382
+ Generated outline
1383
+ id_ger000018_5
1384
+ textrank
1385
+ Liddy: Ich muß sagen – ich bin entzückt..?« »Do is doch was zu do«, sagte er
1386
+ zum Käthchel und wies auf die große Verantwortung hin; Herr Littmann
1387
+ meinte so schön es im Scherz ang’scheckt wie eine Maus in einer Mädl’n oder
1388
+ Frauenzimmerin des Herrn von der Hellenen-Pensionärsfeuerwehre mit dem
1389
+ Namen Ihnen ’nen Kauz auszulachen«. „Mein Vater war ein alter Knabe aus
1390
+ dem Dorf Der hat sich für einen Berufsstart als Tischler entschieden Aber da
1391
+ kommt man ja nicht mehr drauf zurück...“ Nun das ist wahrhaftig kein
1392
+ Wortschatzfehler sondern daß mir auch noch ganz ungebildete Leute zuhören
1393
+ können Als ob mich mein Sohn nur um seine gute Laune gebeten hätte wenn
1394
+ meine Tochter einmal über ihm wäre...
1395
+ id_ger000018_5
1396
+ tf-idf
1397
+ Valeria: Ich wollte dich nicht verlassen. – Ich habe dir es noch gesagt; ich bin
1398
+ dein Freund und deine Dienerin gewesen!« »Und du hast mich verraten?«,
1399
+ sagte er zu mir mit dem Augenschmalze auf den Lippen in der Sprache seiner
1400
+ eigenen Muttersprache so leise als möglich.« Nun komme endlich nach Hause
1401
+ zurück von diesem Abend hier im Garten meiner Schwester Liddy oder dieser
1402
+ Ihen Tochter Molly... wenns kein Irrtum ist gegen das Schicksal meines Vaters
1403
+ für die gute Sache aufzuwarten?’ laß ihn allein sprechen!». ’tschuldigung
1404
+ Vater, aber da war ein Brief an Sie bei Ihrer Ankunft am Bahnhof : Er kam aus
1405
+ Wien ohne Ihre Erlaubnis herüber ins Haus Ihres Sohnes Marquis de La Salle
1406
+ . . . Und nun kommen sie alle wieder hierher um sich ihren Spaß daran gönnen
1407
+ ; denn wie gewöhnlich haben wir beide uns schon einmal unterhalten über
1408
+ einige Dinge zwischen Ihnen beiden.... man muß doch sagen daß diese
1409
+ Begegnung eine gewisse Wahr heit enthält!!’ Ach was soll nur sein – lassen Sie
1410
+ mal hören!’.Das wird ja wohl niemand sehen wollen ob Ihr Sohn wirklich
1411
+ einen Fehler begangen hat unter seinem besten Namen.Herr Baronin, erlauben
1412
+ Herr Graf Renz-Honau, bitte recht freundlichst unsere Hand deines Mannes
1413
+ küssend anzubezeigen....binde Fräulein Gräfin Marie wird alles verzeihen
1414
+ müssen meine Frage wäre jetzt keine Antwort nötig öffne deinen Mund weit
1415
+ genug.” / So sagt mein Bruder zum Doktor – das tut weh!’, fragt er scherzhaft
1416
+ nach einer Bemerkung des Herrn Kommissars... vielleicht sei der Mann zu
1417
+ jung dafür geworden, weil er nicht anders kann tun als seine Frau lieben Zu
1418
+ machen ihm seinen Kummer verständlich darzustellen als auch seine
1419
+ Leidenschaften zu zeigen.
1420
+ Table A1: Examples of outlines generated by the two outline generation models (tf-idf and textrank)
1421
+
1422
+ id_ger000275_37.txt
1423
+ START_OF_SCENE
1424
+ Rosamunde: Ja er ist es! Gelobt sei Gott!
1425
+ Flodoardo: Eure Durchlaucht...
1426
+ Doge: Seid willkommen, Edler Ritter, tausendmal... Habt Ihr Euer Wort gelöst?
1427
+ Flodoardo: Alles, wie Ihr mir geboten, Ist erfüllt; die Republik Frei von jeglicher Gefahr; Und der
1428
+ Himmel lächelt heiter.
1429
+ Doge: Und der Mörder unserer Freunde?
1430
+ Flodoardo:
1431
+ w/o outline
1432
+ Flodoardo: Wir sind gerettet.
1433
+ Doge: Der Tag wird kommen, Daß er sich uns naht.
1434
+ Flodoardo: Stimme: Euer Tod ist unser Tod!
1435
+ Doge: Gelobt ist Gott! ...
1436
+ Flodoardo: Das Glück ruft nach uns! – Der Ritter Des Todes, Der die Stadt umringt, Der Ritter von
1437
+ Florenz, Der den Kaiser stürzen will! – Hört mich an!
1438
+ Flodoardo: O Gott!
1439
+ Doge: Und er, der den Kaiser stürzen wollen –?
1440
+ Flodoardo: Er soll sich erheben, Und der Herr ist frei! Weh ihm, daß er es erfährt! Ich bitte Euch,
1441
+ laßt ihn, er soll nicht mehr Euch, Ihm allein, sprechen. Fluch und Haß und Tod sind für uns Leben.
1442
+ w extracted outline
1443
+ Flodoardo: Auch dieser Mensch, der mit uns ins Gefängnis kam, Der auf diesen Felsen gesprungen
1444
+ ist, Und sich vor mir entblößte, so als der Retter der Republik?
1445
+ Flodoardo: Er war der letzte, der hier saß, bis zum letztenmal. Ich bin, wer er? Dogt mir.
1446
+ Flodoardo:
1447
+ Doge: Wer war der erste? O wie Ihr ihn nennt, den ersten.
1448
+ Flodoardo: Wen nannte der König?
1449
+ Doge: Mein Herzog. Dogt nicht das Gerücht.
1450
+ Doge: Die Republik hat ihn ausgerufen.
1451
+ Flodoardo: Ein Fürst.
1452
+ Doge: Ein Mann. – Ihr, mein edler Herr Abbate; Ihr, hochfürstlicher Herr Follo liegt bereits in den
1453
+ Eisen.
1454
+ Flodoardo: Was wird aus Eurer Freiheit? – Contarini, Euer Oberst Frosso liegt schon In den Eisen;
1455
+ Es wird von der Nacht so viel geredet, Die ihn verderben und aufhetzen.
1456
+ Parozzi: seht, daß Ihr, das schwöre ich, Den Prinzen Valerio vor euch schützt.
1457
+ Flodoardo: Wünschst du, daß der Herzog nicht? –
1458
+ Doge:
1459
+ 2-3: Wünschest du, daß ich es nicht könne? – Alle anderen? – Die ganze Republik? – – Wir?
1460
+ Flodoardo: Denselben, den ihr im Dunklen habt?
1461
+ Doge: So wie sie sind, so muß ich auch das sagen. Wir müssen ihn selbst holen.
1462
+ Flodoardo: Und der Richter von Florenz?
1463
+ Doge: Der Herzog kommt mir zu nah.
1464
+ Flodoardo: Ist die Flucht so ein Glück?
1465
+ Flodoardo: der Herzog von Parozzi.
1466
+ Doge: Er wird mich mit seinen Kindern einsperren.
1467
+ Table A2: Example texts generated by the different models.
1468
+ Part 1/3. Continued on the next page.
1469
+
1470
+ id_ger000275_37.txtr
1471
+ w TextRank outline
1472
+ Flodoardo: Sie sind so frei und liebenswürdig?
1473
+ Flodoardo: Und unsere ganze Menschheit? Und die Menschheit...
1474
+ Flodoardo: Und die? ...
1475
+ Doge: Und was noch wichtiger ist! Denn in der ganzen Welt, die auch noch so verwegen, und die so
1476
+ viel Geld bringt, die ganze Menschheit noch so viel Geld macht!
1477
+ Flodoardo: Die Menschheit ist ein ganz Anderer! Ihr macht es doch noch schlimmer, wenn Ihr mir
1478
+ die Hand reichen wollt.
1479
+ Doge: Wenn Ihr Euch damit nicht zufrieden macht, so muß ich Euch doch den Kopf zerbrechen lassen.
1480
+ Flodoardo: Ihr solltet Euch denn nicht mehr ärgern, wenn Euch Euer Leben nicht mehr wert ist.
1481
+ Doge: So könnt Ihr Eure Seele zum Tode schlagen.
1482
+ Flodoardo: Wie!
1483
+ Doge: Sie sind so frei...
1484
+ Flodoardo: So, meine Herren, mit Euch muß man nicht mehr um das Leben tanzen, daß man doch
1485
+ gleich zu Grunde kommen will.
1486
+ Doge: Und Euer einziges Recht – so!
1487
+ Flodoardo: Das Recht –
1488
+ Doge: Denkt Ihr?
1489
+ Flodoardo: Ja wenn Ihr mich nicht wollt. Wir sind doch beide nicht frei. Ihr werdet noch alle Eurer
1490
+ Liebe, Euren Haß, Euren Eifer, Euren Schmerz verlieren. Ihr seid mein Freund!
1491
+ Doge: Und Ihr wollt leben, wo Ihr es wagt.
1492
+ Flodoardo: Es gibt Euch doch wohl in der Welt nichts was mehr ein Mann wagen würde.
1493
+ Doge: und Ihr seid auch ein Weib!
1494
+ Flodoardo: Ich! – Ihr seid noch nicht frei?
1495
+ Doge: Ihr könnt auch für Euren Mann leben.
1496
+ Doge: Wenn ich mir so in Eure Hände lerne... wenn Ihr mir nun nicht mehr traut.
1497
+ Flodoardo:
1498
+ Flodoardo: ich schwöre Euch auf Euer Recht. Ihr seid es, Ihr habt es, so will ich es! – Auch Euch ist
1499
+ es nicht anders möglich?
1500
+ Flodoardo: Nein, Euer Herz ist zu schwach. Es war ja der einzige Grund, Euch hierher zu schicken.
1501
+ Doge: ja was hast du da zu tun?
1502
+ Flodoardo: Wie?
1503
+ Doge: Das ist ganz der Mann in dieser Welt, der ich sein will.
1504
+ w TF-IDF outline
1505
+ Flodoardo: Er hat den Mann, der ihn umgebracht hat, umgebracht... – O, die Herrschaft hat mehr als
1506
+ uns geboten! Wenn er uns nicht den Mann genommen hat, den er umgebracht hat, und den Leichnam
1507
+ hat er sich selbst um den Hals geworfen. O nein, man wird uns doch nicht einmal mit dieser Schmach
1508
+ zu helfen wagen.
1509
+ Flodoardo: Der Mord ist doch nicht eine Sache, die wir vor der Welt tun könnten... man müßte es
1510
+ doch wohl auch tun! – und daß er sich hier umgebracht hat! – daß wir uns mit ihm verbanden? – daß
1511
+ die Unschuld uns nicht mehr gebiet. – daß er sich auch in dem Mord einen Mord an einem anderen
1512
+ schuldig gemacht hat? – er hat uns nicht mit einem Mord gebieten, den der uns nicht mehr wollte. –
1513
+ daß der Mörder uns erbarmen hat, ist ein Undank. – weil er keinen mehr in seinem Leben hat? – daß
1514
+ er eine Mörderbande an den Mörder hat!
1515
+ Flodoardo: Das muß ich sagen... So soll er sich doch nicht schuldig machen... – und daß alle in dem
1516
+ Leben eines anderen sind! – warum sollten sie dem anderen noch was zutrauen! – – daß sie uns
1517
+ doch nur noch eine Freude machen könnten! – er ist doch gar nicht einmal auf dem Wege! – aber er
1518
+ hat doch etwas, was wir uns zutrauen haben! – oder daß er sich von einer Stunde an selber schuldig
1519
+ macht... – daß keiner den Mörder hat, der sich ihm den Mord hat nehmen lassen, und der dem Mörder
1520
+ noch ein Mensch ist! – Und dann wird er sich in die Arme von diesem Mörder gelegt haben. – dass
1521
+ wir nichts zu tun hätten! – ob wir denn von unserem Mord wüssten?
1522
+ Doge: Und daß diese Mörder von ihrem eigenen Blut sein werden? – und daß wir es wirklich nicht
1523
+ mehr sein können, dass er uns die Schuld gibt! – weil uns das Gesetz sagt. – und daß ich den Mord
1524
+ nicht will! – – und daß wir uns das nicht selber antun! – daß er uns nicht will! ? – dass er den Mord
1525
+ nicht kann, wenn wir ihn nicht kriegen! – dass sein Blut nicht weiß! – was er uns tut! – denn wenn er
1526
+ das nicht kann! – uns beide! – in den Tod! – wenn er sich selbst umgebracht hat! – nicht mit dem
1527
+ Blut der Kinder? – wenn sein Herz nicht in dem Blute ist! – und wir!
1528
+ Continuation of Table A2. Example texts generated by the different models.
1529
+ Part 2/3. Continued on the next page.
1530
+
1531
+ id_ger000200_4.txtr
1532
+ START_OF_SCENE
1533
+ Kauz: Schön gute Morgen, Frau Nièce!
1534
+ Frau Von Erbsenstein: Der Morgen kann gut und schön sein, ich bin aber bös und wild!
1535
+ Kauz: Bös, das kann sein, aber wild –? Im Gegenteil, ich finde, daß dieser Anzug –
1536
+ Frau Von Erbsenstein:
1537
+ w/o outline
1538
+ Frau Von Erbsenstein: Er ist noch einmal ein Anderer – er ist ein besserer Herr als du.
1539
+ Kauz: Ist er aber nicht! Ich bin nicht in der Stimmung, daß ich mir einbilde. – Die Nacht ist schön,
1540
+ da kommt es mir vor, als sollte ich schlafen.
1541
+ Kauz: Du, Marie, wie ist das möglich?
1542
+ Kauz: Ich liebe Sie, aber nicht so sehr, als wenn ich mit Ihnen schlafen wollte. Der Herr von
1543
+ Boskowitz ist ein Mann, was weiß ich! Und ich soll mit Ihnen schlafen?
1544
+ Kauz: Ich werde heiraten.
1545
+ Kauz: Das kann ich nicht sagen. Ich habe noch nie gesagt, daß ich so jung heiraten will.
1546
+ Marie – Ich auch nicht, aber ich sage es ganz offen: ich will nicht verheiratet sein.
1547
+ w extracted outline
1548
+ Frau Von Erbsenstein: Es is wieder Zeit, das Gute zu sagen, das zu sagen, was zu sagen – wie ich
1549
+ sagen will.
1550
+ Kauz:
1551
+ Frau Von Erbsensteins Sohn: Ja, richtig, das weiß man im übrigen schon, den Onkel, der hat auch
1552
+ den Titel schon bekommen.
1553
+ Herr von Erbsenstein.
1554
+ Kauz: Keizer.
1555
+ Kauz: »Wild«: Ach! Frau von Erbsensteins Tochter! Keizers Tochter?
1556
+ Kauz: Nun, dann wäre die Zeit gekommen, daß ich auf die andere Seite hinübergehe, und michFrau
1557
+ Von Rätzer, Frau Von Erbsen! ...
1558
+ Kauz: Ich bin ja schon so früh dran, die Nacht werde ich nicht vergessen, wenn ich mich schon auf
1559
+ die Seite setze.
1560
+ Kauz: Das geht nicht, Frau Von Rätzern...
1561
+ Kauz: Ja so. Keizer!
1562
+ FrauVon Erbsenstein! Kiezer! Kiezer?
1563
+ Kauz: Da. Kriezer! Da sind ja die anderen. Frau Und da sind es die anderen.
1564
+ Kauz: Kaizer! Was geht uns das alles an!
1565
+ w Textrank outline
1566
+ Frau Von Erbsenstein: Ich glaube sie hat ihn ganz richtig, Frau Von Erbsensteins –
1567
+ Kauz: Ja so, ja so.
1568
+ Kauz: Die ist ja ganz schwarz und weiß wie die Haare von Hunden! Aber ich finde die Haare doch
1569
+ noch so dunkel! Ich muß mal schaun! Brauchst dich nicht zu drehen, Frau Von Zedlitz, das hat nix
1570
+ mit mir zu tun. Der Herr hat gesagt es wäre ja ein kleiner Mensch von dem ich glaube ich muß es
1571
+ doch nicht sein? Der Herr hat denn auch gesagt das ist nichts als ein ungebärdriges Ding, das kann
1572
+ doch ein nicht wahr! Das heißt, du meinst Herr von Zedlitz? Ja so – was denn? Das is ein wenig zu
1573
+ viel der Anstand und wie viel Herr von Zadl ist, aber das is eine andere Geschichte. Aber ich habe
1574
+ ja immer gesagt das is was für die Leute –
1575
+ Kauz: die haben gesagt das is nix von Mensch! – Das muß doch net anders sein als mit mir – Was is
1576
+ denn? Bös! Der Herr kommt schon zurück. Ich hab es ja schon immer gesagt das war was er! Ich
1577
+ habe das so satt mit Herrn von Zedl. Ja das is halt mein Herr! So! Du gehst doch zum Teufel, ob ich
1578
+ mich net bewerbe! Da kann ich nicht widersprechen!
1579
+ Kauz: Also du? Na wenn du meinst nicht? Du gehst ja! der is nur ’n bißchen auf deine Finger
1580
+ gekriegt! Bösl! Der Bursche is ja schon wieder! Wenn du dir nachher den Teufel zum Maul hält,
1581
+ wie die anderen. Ich glaube du solltest der Kerl sein den ich mir ausgedacht habe!
1582
+ Kauz: Das is wirklich gut!
1583
+ w TF-IDF outline
1584
+ Frau Von Erbsenstein: Ich muß mit Ihnen ehrlich und herzlich über unsere Lage sprechen, wir
1585
+ habens immer vermieden, daß es zu einer Entscheidung kommt. Jetzt weiß ich schon, daß der Alte
1586
+ nicht ein ehrlicher Mensch ist, sondern ein Schuft! Was ist die Frau? Ich bin auch da! Frau von
1587
+ Erbsenstein, Sie müssen kommen! »Ein Herr hat mir erzählt, daß Sie in Amerika sind, wie Sie
1588
+ so schön heißen? »Ein junger Herr aus der Stadt ist hier von der Börse gegangen. Und ein so ein
1589
+ alter Mann wie Sie – wie? ...« Im Gegenteil sind wir doch alle drei ein hübsches Paar! Frau... Im
1590
+ Gegenteil!
1591
+ Kauz: Und die Herrn! Sind drei Jahre lang im Ausland – das freut mich! Frau Soehne! Frau! ! Was
1592
+ sagen Sie? Haben Sie denn das ganze Jahr wohl noch nicht bemerkt? Es ist doch was anderes! Ein
1593
+ Mensch! »Was steht drin?« Haben Sie das ganze Jahr noch nicht bemerkt. »Was wissen Sie noch
1594
+ von dem Geld? Ich hätte es Ihnen sagen müssen, daß ich den alten Herrn aus Amerika bin, den ich
1595
+ noch nicht kenne. »Und nun? »Was tun Sie, Frau?« »Was geht mich das an?« »Mir bleibt nichts
1596
+ erspart, ich kann jetzt nur lachen! »Wie steht das Geld?« »Was sagen Sie, Frau, Sie haben es wohl
1597
+ nicht gelesen?« »Woher »?«« »Was verstehen Sie von diesen Büchern?« »Warum »Warum nicht
1598
+ gelesen? Warum nicht gelesen, und nicht gelesen?«. »Was geht mich denn das an? Lesen Sie sich
1599
+ das alles! Kaufen Sie sich über die Bücher? »Ich lese alles was sie mir so sagen, aber ich bin ja eine
1600
+ ganz vernünftige Frau!« »Was steht darin geschrieben?« Ich bin gar nicht zufrieden! »Und was steht
1601
+ drin? »Wie stehen Sie da?« »Wer weiß, was Sie über die Bücher gelesen haben.« »Warum nicht
1602
+ die Menschen?« Und mit »Der Mensch! Der Mensch!« »Der Mensch? »Den Menschen?« »Den
1603
+ Mensch! Sie können lachen! Haben Sie sich je an mich geliehen? »Haben Sie Ihr Buch im Ausland
1604
+ gelesen? »Hat er das Buch geschrieben?« »Hat er das Bücher geschrieben, Herr Professor? »Und
1605
+ hat er das Buch gelesen?« Wie gesagt!
1606
+ Continuation of Table A2. Example texts generated by the different models.
1607
+ Part 3/3
1608
+
1609
+ Herr Scheinfromm.
1610
+ Madam Glaubeleichten, was sagen sie?
1611
+ Frau Glaubeleichten.
1612
+ Die Wiedergeburt ist das süße Quell-Wasser des Herzens sage ich, welches aus der Sophia urständet,
1613
+ und das himmlische Weltwesen gebühret.
1614
+ Herr Scheinfromm,
1615
+ ( nachdenklich.)
1616
+ Das süß - - se Quell - Was - - sehr des - - Her - - sens - - das ist ziemlich deutlich. Wel - - ches - - aus -
1617
+ - der - - So - - phi - - a - - ur - - stän - - det, - - und - - das - - himm - - li - - sche - - Welt - - wesen ge - -
1618
+ bieh - - ret. Das ist sehr schön und deutlich erklärt. Und sie Madame?
1619
+ Frau Zanckenheimin.
1620
+ Ich sage, es ist die Erbohrenwerdung der himmlischen Wesenheit aus der Selbstheit der animalischen
1621
+ Seele in dem Centro des irdischen Menschen, und windet sich einwärts wie ein Rad.
1622
+ Herr Scheinfromm.
1623
+ Die - - Er - - boh - - ren - - wer - - dung - - der - - hemm - - li - - schen - - We - - sein - - heit - - In
1624
+ Wahrheit! das ist sehr schön gesagt! Und sie Madame?
1625
+ Frau Seufzerin.
1626
+ Es ist eine himmlische Tinktur, wodurch die neue Seele das vegetabilische Leben der vier Elementen
1627
+ wegwirft, und die magische Seele, als die
1628
+ Gottheit in seiner Gleichheit, nach dem Modell der Weisheit in alle Dinge einbildet.
1629
+ Herr Scheinfromm.
1630
+ Pots tausend! das ist hoch! Eine himmlische Tinktur, wodurch die vegetabilische Seele - - -
1631
+ Frau Seufzerin.
1632
+ Nein! die neue Seele - - -
1633
+ Herr Scheinfromm.
1634
+ Schon gut! es ist einerlei. Aber die Erklärung gefällt mir sehr.
1635
+ Figure A1: Excerpt from the drama ’Die Pietisterey im Fischbein Rocke’(1736) by Luise Adelgunde Victorie
1636
+ Gottsched, which was one of the dramas used for training.
1637
+
FNE1T4oBgHgl3EQfWwTK/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
FtAyT4oBgHgl3EQfSvdV/content/tmp_files/2301.00091v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1208 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+ Wealth Redistribution and Mutual Aid: Comparison
10
+ using Equivalent/Nonequivalent Exchange Models
11
+ of Econophysics
12
+ Takeshi Kato 1,*
13
+ 1 Hitachi Kyoto University Laboratory, Open Innovation Institute, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
14
+ * Correspondence: [email protected]
15
+ Abstract: Given the wealth inequality worldwide, there is an urgent need to identify the mode of
16
+ wealth exchange through which it arises. To address the research gap regarding models that
17
+ combine equivalent exchange and redistribution, this study compares an equivalent market
18
+ exchange with redistribution based on power centers and a nonequivalent exchange with mutual
19
+ aid using the Polanyi, Graeber, and Karatani modes of exchange. Two new exchange models based
20
+ on multi-agent interactions are reconstructed following an econophysics approach for evaluating
21
+ the Gini index (inequality) and total exchange (economic flow). Exchange simulations indicate that
22
+ the evaluation parameter of the total exchange divided by the Gini index can be expressed by the
23
+ same saturated curvilinear approximate equation using the wealth transfer rate and time period of
24
+ redistribution and the surplus contribution rate of the wealthy and the saving rate. However,
25
+ considering the coercion of taxes and its associated costs and independence based on the morality
26
+ of mutual aid, a nonequivalent exchange without return obligation is preferred. This is oriented
27
+ toward Graeber's baseline communism and Karatani's mode of exchange D, with implications for
28
+ alternatives to the capitalist economy.
29
+ Keywords: inequalities and wealth redistribution; taxes and redistribution; mutual aid; equivalent
30
+ exchange; nonequivalent exchange; markets; economic flow; econophysics;
31
+
32
+ 1. Introduction
33
+ Wealth inequality is a major social problem in various countries worldwide [1].
34
+ Survey results indicate that the global Gini index is approximately 0.7, indicating
35
+ widespread inequality [2]. A Gini index of 0.4 represents a warning level for social unrest
36
+ [3], and some countries far exceed this level, including South Africa, Namibia, and
37
+ Suriname [4]. Higher social unrest leads to lower production and further inequality,
38
+ which in turn leads to social unrest again, creating a vicious cycle [5].
39
+ The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals has prioritized Goal 10—which
40
+ aims to “reduce income inequalities,” “promote universal social, economic and political
41
+ inclusion,” and “adopt fiscal and social policies that promote equality,” among other
42
+ targets—along with Goals 1, 2, 8, and 16 (no poverty, zero hunger, inclusive economic
43
+ growth, and justice and inclusive institutions, respectively) [6]. Moreover, the United
44
+ Nations University studies the impact of inequality on economic growth, human
45
+ development, and governance, with inequality as a core concern [7]. Thus, there is a need
46
+ to identify which types of economic relations—that is, which modes of exchange of
47
+ wealth—result in inequality. For this, different definitions of the modes of exchange must
48
+ be considered.
49
+ The economist Polanyi identified three modes of economic exchange: reciprocity,
50
+ redistribution, and market exchange [8]. Reciprocity includes the transfer of goods
51
+
52
+
53
+ 2 of 17
54
+
55
+
56
+ through gifts with the obligation to provide returns in nonhierarchical relationships;
57
+ redistribution indicates the transfer of goods through the collection and refund of taxes
58
+ based on the centrality of power; and market exchange represents the equivalent transfer
59
+ of goods based on money prices in the market. In other words, reciprocity is a
60
+ nonequivalent exchange with the obligation to return, market is an equivalent exchange,
61
+ and redistribution is an equivalent exchange coordinated by a power center.
62
+ The anthropologist Graeber presented baseline communism, exchange, and
63
+ hierarchy as the three moral principles of economic relations [9]. Baseline communism is
64
+ a mutual-aid human relationship wherein each person contributes based on their ability
65
+ and is provided a return according to need; exchange is a process toward equivalence, an
66
+ inhuman relationship that can be dissolved through profit and loss; and hierarchy
67
+ represents a relationship bound and controlled by custom and precedent, with no
68
+ tendency to operate through reciprocity. Therefore, baseline communism is a
69
+ nonequivalent exchange without the obligation to return, exchange is an exactly
70
+ equivalent exchange, and hierarchy is a specific form of redistribution with tribute
71
+ imposed on proteges and alms posed as protection of a power center.
72
+ The philosopher Karatani presented four modes of exchange as the various stages of
73
+ the world system [10]. Modes of exchange A, B, C, and D represent reciprocity in civil
74
+ society (gift and return), plunder and redistribution in the empire (domination and
75
+ protection), commodity exchange in the capitalist economy (money and commodities),
76
+ and restoration of the reciprocal-mutual aid relationship of A to a higher level in the world
77
+ republic idealized by Kant, respectively. Mode of exchange A is thus a nonequivalent
78
+ exchange with the obligation to return, B is a form of redistribution, C is an equivalent
79
+ exchange, and D is a nonequivalent exchange without the obligation to return.
80
+ A comparison of the three typologies above show that the following definitions
81
+ correspond with each other, as shown in Table 1: Polanyi’s reciprocity and Karatani’s
82
+ mode of exchange A with nonequivalence and return; Polanyi’s redistribution, Graeber's
83
+ hierarchy, and Karatani’s mode of exchange B with centrality of power; Polanyi’s market
84
+ exchange, Graeber's exchange, and Karatani’s mode of exchange C with equivalence; and
85
+ Graeber's baseline communism and Karatani’s mode of exchange D with nonequivalence
86
+ and without return.
87
+ Table 1. Comparison of economic typologies by Polanyi, Graeber and Karatani.
88
+ Typology
89
+ Polanyi
90
+ Graeber
91
+ Karatani
92
+ Nonequivalent exchange
93
+ with obligation to return
94
+ Reciprocity
95
+
96
+ Mode of exchange A
97
+ Redistribution
98
+ by power center
99
+ Redistribution
100
+ Hierarchy
101
+ B
102
+ Equivalent exchange
103
+ in market
104
+ Market exchange
105
+ Exchange
106
+ C
107
+ Nonequivalent exchange
108
+ without obligation to return
109
+
110
+ Baseline communism
111
+ D
112
+ The contemporary capitalist economy and social security comprise a hybrid of
113
+ equivalent market exchange (C) and redistribution by power center (B). In contrast,
114
+ alternatives to the capitalist economy can be considered as a mutual-aid baseline
115
+ communism and mode of exchange D, which sublimates mode of exchange A. Therefore,
116
+ it is necessary to identify whether a hybrid of equivalent exchange and redistribution (B
117
+ and C) or that of a mutual-aid nonequivalent exchange without obligation to return (D)
118
+ would be preferable to suppress wealth inequality.
119
+ Econophysics uses a statistical physics approach for examining wealth exchange and
120
+ distribution and the mechanisms of redistribution (see, for example, the comprehensive
121
+ reviews by Chakrabarti A. S. and Chakrabarti B. K., Rosser, and Ribeiro, respectively [11–
122
+ 13]). Champernowne explained Pareto's law based on time series changes in income
123
+
124
+
125
+ 3 of 17
126
+
127
+
128
+ distribution through stochastic processes [14]. Sociologist Angle showed that the gamma
129
+ distribution arises through economic agents’ stochastic processes [15]. Furthermore,
130
+ Dragulescu and Yakovenko illustrated that the monetary distribution follows an
131
+ exponential Boltzmann–Gibbs distribution based on the analogy of energy conservation
132
+ [16], and Chakraborti and Hayes demonstrated that a delta distribution arises when
133
+ applying a model of random wealth transfer to one of the poor and the wealthy based on
134
+ the analogy of kinetic energy exchange in collisions of ideal gas particles [17,18].
135
+ Chatterjee and Chakrabarti extended these models and showed that an exponential
136
+ distribution can be obtained using a model in which wealth is randomly divided among
137
+ agents [19]. Furthermore, Chakraborti and Chakrabarti indicated that gamma and power
138
+ distributions can be obtained using a model in which agents follow a nonequivalent
139
+ exchange except for savings [20]. Kato et al. showed that a delta distribution can be
140
+ obtained using a model in which wealth is exchanged equivalently according to the poor
141
+ [21]. In addition, Guala used a nonequivalent exchange model combining exchange and
142
+ tax redistribution for obtaining exponential and gamma distributions based on the tax rate
143
+ [22], and Chakrabarti A. S. and Chakrabarti B. K. used a model combining nonequivalent
144
+ exchange and redistribution by insurance to obtain insurance rate-based exponential,
145
+ gamma, and delta distributions [23].
146
+ Furthermore, Kato and Hiroi used a nonequivalent exchange model in which the
147
+ wealthy contribute surplus stock to obtain delta and gamma-like distributions based on
148
+ the contribution rate; they showed that the contribution of surplus stock by the wealthy
149
+ is necessary for activating economic flow and reducing inequality [24]. Kato further used
150
+ an exchange model combining interest, profit and loss, and redistribution to obtain delta
151
+ and gamma-like distributions and demonstrated that the prohibition of interest, fair
152
+ distribution of profit and loss, and redistribution based to the quintile axiom in welfare
153
+ economics are required for reducing inequality [25].
154
+ Elsewhere, Iglesias showed that inequality, as measured by the Gini index, is
155
+ dramatically reduced by extremally modeling the collection of a tax proportional to the
156
+ wealth difference from local or global agents around the poorest agent and the
157
+ redistribution of the tax to the poorest agent [26]. Moreover, Lima et al. showed that a
158
+ combination of win/lose equivalent transaction based on the wealth of the poor, power-
159
+ law tax that is more burdensome on the wealthy, and tax exemption for the poor can result
160
+ in bimodal or flat wealth distributions, and that tax exemptions do not necessarily reduce
161
+ inequality, as assessed using the Gini index [27]. These Iglesias and Lima models are
162
+ effectively nonequivalent exchanges, since each exchange is taxed according to wealth.
163
+ The abovementioned studies do not use models that combine an equivalent exchange
164
+ with a redistribution separated from it by a certain time period, however. In this study, I
165
+ aim to reconstruct an exchange model that represents a hybrid of equivalent exchange
166
+ and redistribution (modes of exchange B and C) and a mutual-aid nonequivalent
167
+ exchange without obligation to return (mode D) based on the abovementioned exchange
168
+ model of econophysics. I also compare redistribution and mutual aid in terms of wealth
169
+ distribution, inequality, and economic flow to provide guidelines for alternative
170
+ capitalism. This study is novel in that it compares redistribution with mutual-aid
171
+ nonequivalent exchange. Furthermore, it describes new relationships between the
172
+ following phenomena: economic flow and inequality; wealth transfer, time period, and
173
+ redistribution; and surplus contribution of the wealthy, saving, and mutual aid. Based on
174
+ the comparison, I provide new insights into alternatives to the capitalist economy.
175
+ In the present model (hybrid of equivalent exchange and redistribution), I combine
176
+ the equivalent exchange model of Kato et al. [21] to represent Polanyi's market exchange,
177
+ Graeber's exchange, and Karatani's mode of exchange C and Kato's redistribution model
178
+ [25] to represent Polanyi's redistribution, Graeber's hierarchy, and Karatani's mode of
179
+ exchange B. To model mutual-aid nonequivalent exchange, I adopt Kato and Hiroi's
180
+ surplus stock contribution model [24] to represent Graeber's baseline communism and
181
+
182
+
183
+ 4 of 17
184
+
185
+
186
+ Karatani's mode of exchange D, repositioning the surplus stock contribution of the
187
+ wealthy as a mutual aid without the obligation of return.
188
+ The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. The Methods section (Section 2)
189
+ presents models of equivalent exchange and redistribution and mutual-aid nonequivalent
190
+ exchange models, as well as the methods for calculating the Gini index and total exchange
191
+ to assess wealth inequality and economic flow. The Results section (Section 3) compares
192
+ the simulation results of wealth distributions and the Gini index and total exchange
193
+ calculations for the two models to illustrate their relationship. The Discussion section
194
+ (Section 4) examines the contemporary significance of mutual aid for redistribution
195
+ considering these results and presents discussions on the nature of mutual aid for
196
+ alternatives to the capitalist economy. The Conclusion section (Section 5) presents the key
197
+ conclusions and future challenges.
198
+ 2. Methods
199
+ 2.1. Exchange Models
200
+ Figure 1 visualizes different exchange models that can be used to measure and
201
+ understand inequality, to be explained in detail below.
202
+ Figure 1. Exchange models. 𝑚𝑖 and 𝑚𝑗 represent the wealth of agents 𝑖 and 𝑗, respectively, at
203
+ times 𝑡, 𝑡 + 1 and 𝑡 + ∆. 𝜆 represents the common savings rate, and 𝜀 represents the random
204
+ division probability. (a) Basic exchange model; (b) Equivalent exchange model (EX) with
205
+ redistribution rate 𝜉 and time period 𝑡𝑝; (c) Nonequivalent exchange model (NX) with surplus
206
+ contribution rate 𝛾.
207
+ 2.1.1 Basic Exchange Model
208
+ First, I present the basic wealth exchange model proposed by Chakraborti and
209
+ Chakrabarti [20]. Two agents 𝑖,𝑗 (= 1,2, ⋯,𝑁) are selected randomly from among 𝑁
210
+ economic agents. Let the wealth of agents 𝑖 and 𝑗 at time 𝑡 be 𝑚𝑖(𝑡) and 𝑚𝑗(𝑡),
211
+ respectively, with a common saving rate 𝜆 for both. Figure 1 (a) shows that the two
212
+ agents 𝑖 and 𝑗 save part of their wealth at time 𝑡 with a savings rate 𝜆 and exchange
213
+ the remaining wealth (1 − 𝜆) ∙ (𝑚𝑖(𝑡) + 𝑚𝑗(𝑡)) , excluding savings, with a random
214
+ division probability 𝜀, which is a uniform random number defined in the range 0 ≤ 𝜀 ≤
215
+ 1. This basic model is a nonequivalent exchange model wherein the poor and the wealthy
216
+
217
+ (a) Basic exchange model
218
+ (c) NX model (nonequivalent exchange with mutual aid)
219
+ (1 - ) · y · (mj - mi)
220
+ (1 - ^) ·mj
221
+ (1 - ) ·mi
222
+ (1 - ) : mi
223
+ (1 -) · mi
224
+ ^· mj
225
+ · mj
226
+ A·mi
227
+ 入·mi
228
+ m;(t)
229
+ m;(t)
230
+ m;(t + 1) m;(t + 1)
231
+ (b)EXmodel(equivalentexchangewithredistribution)
232
+ tp period
233
+ (1 - ) · mi
234
+ (1 -~) · mi
235
+ Λ·mi
236
+ Λ· mj
237
+ m;(t + 1) m;(t + 1)
238
+ m,(t + ) mz(t + △)
239
+ m;(t + △)
240
+ m;(t + △)
241
+ mv(t + △)
242
+ 5 of 17
243
+
244
+
245
+ offer all their wealth (except their savings) in exchange. The wealth 𝑚𝑖(𝑡 + 1) and 𝑚𝑗(𝑡+
246
+ 1) of the two agents 𝑖 and 𝑗, respectively, at time 𝑡 + 1 are expressed as
247
+ 𝑚𝑖(𝑡 + 1) = 𝜆 ∙ 𝑚𝑖(𝑡) + 𝜀 ∙ (1 − 𝜆) ∙ (𝑚𝑖(𝑡) + 𝑚𝑗(𝑡));
248
+ (1a)
249
+ 𝑚𝑗(𝑡+ 1) = 𝜆 ∙ 𝑚𝑗(𝑡) + (1 − 𝜀) ∙ (1 − 𝜆) ∙ (𝑚𝑖(𝑡) + 𝑚𝑗(𝑡)).
250
+ (1b)
251
+ 2.1.2. Equivalent Exchange Model
252
+ The equivalent exchange model that matches the wealth of the poor (hereafter, the
253
+ EX model) proposed by Kato et al. [21] is based on the nonequivalent exchange model, as
254
+ presented in Equations (1a) and (1b). As indicated in Figure 1 (b), the EX model
255
+ determines the amount of exchange based on the wealth Min(𝑚𝑖(𝑡), 𝑚𝑗(𝑡)) of the poorer
256
+ of the two agents, 𝑖 and 𝑗. The exchange amount presented by the wealthy and the poor
257
+ is exchanged with a random division probability 𝜀, which is a uniform random number
258
+ in the range 0 ≤ 𝜀 ≤ 1. Wealth 𝑚𝑖(𝑡+ 1) and 𝑚𝑗(𝑡+ 1) at time 𝑡 + 1 are expressed as
259
+ 𝑚𝑖𝑛 = Min(𝑚𝑖(𝑡), 𝑚𝑗(𝑡)),
260
+ (2a)
261
+ 𝑚𝑖(𝑡 + 1) = 𝑚𝑖(𝑡) − (1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝑚𝑖𝑛 + 2 ∙ 𝜀 ∙ (1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝑚𝑖𝑛;
262
+ (2b)
263
+ 𝑚𝑗(𝑡 + 1) = 𝑚𝑗(𝑡) − (1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝑚𝑖𝑛 + 2 ∙ (1 − 𝜀) ∙ (1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝑚𝑖𝑛.
264
+ (2c)
265
+ Repeating the exchange process in the EX model yields a delta distribution in which
266
+ all wealth is concentrated in one agent’s hands, as shown in the literature [21].
267
+ Furthermore, in the EX model, redistribution is newly combined with the equivalent
268
+ exchange shown in Equations (2a)–(2c). For the redistribution, I use the model proposed
269
+ by Kato [25]. In this model, the wealth transfer rate 𝜉 and the time period 𝑡𝑝 for
270
+ redistribution are set, and 𝑁 agents simultaneously distribute the wealth 𝜉 ∙ 𝑚𝑖(𝑡)
271
+ corresponding to the transfer rate 𝜉 to all others equally in every period 𝑡𝑝 (Figure 1 (b)).
272
+ This is because establishing an average period and an average amount of redistribution
273
+ when assessing the effectiveness of redistribution in reducing inequality is considered
274
+ sufficient. The wealth 𝑚𝑖(𝑡 + ∆) of agent 𝑖 at time 𝑡 + ∆ immediately after period 𝑡𝑝 is
275
+ expressed as
276
+ 𝑚𝑖(𝑡 + ∆) = (1 − 𝜉) ∙ 𝑚𝑖(𝑡) + 𝜉 ∙ ∑
277
+ 𝑚𝑗(𝑡)
278
+ 𝑗≠𝑖
279
+ 𝑁 − 1
280
+ .
281
+ (3)
282
+ 2.1.3 Nonequivalent Exchange Model
283
+ I use the model proposed by Kato and Hiroi [24] as a mutual-aid nonequivalent
284
+ exchange model without obligation to return (hereafter, the NX model). The NX model is
285
+ a compromise between the nonequivalent and equivalent exchange models presented in
286
+ Equations (1a), (1b) and (2a)–(2c), respectively. In the first, the wealthy contribute all
287
+ surplus wealth except savings, which is not realistic in exchange, that is, economic
288
+ transactions. In the second, the wealthy only contribute wealth equivalent to that of the
289
+ poor; in the absence of redistribution, extreme inequality, such as a delta distribution, is
290
+ likely. Thus, Kato and Hiroi set up a model in which the wealthy contribute a portion of
291
+ their surplus wealth over that of the poor to control inequality to a practical extent.
292
+ As shown in Figure 1 (c), in the NX model, the wealth of the poor and the wealthy
293
+ are 𝑚𝑖𝑛 = Min(𝑚𝑖(𝑡), 𝑚𝑗(𝑡)) and 𝑚𝑎𝑥 = Max (𝑚𝑖(𝑡), 𝑚𝑗(𝑡)) , respectively; the poor
294
+ take surplus wealth (1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝑚𝑖𝑛 as the exchange amount. The wealthy’s exchange
295
+ amount is the wealth (1 − 𝜆) ∙ (𝑚𝑖𝑛 + 𝛾 ∙ (𝑚𝑎𝑥 − 𝑚𝑖𝑛)); this is the sum of the poor’s
296
+ surplus wealth (1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝑚𝑖𝑛 and the wealth (1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝛾 ∙ (𝑚𝑎𝑥 − 𝑚𝑖𝑛) , which is the
297
+ amount of the wealthy’s surplus wealth (1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝑚𝑎𝑥 less (1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝑚𝑖𝑛 multiplied by
298
+ the surplus contribution rate γ.
299
+
300
+
301
+ 6 of 17
302
+
303
+
304
+ The poor and wealthy then exchange the amounts mutually proposed with a random
305
+ division probability 𝜀, which is a uniform random number defined in the range 0 ≤ 𝜀 ≤
306
+ 1. Graeber’s baseline communism is a mutual-aid relationship in which each person
307
+ contributes based on their ability and each person is given according to their need,
308
+ without obligation to return. Although the contribution of surplus wealth from the
309
+ wealthy to the poor inherently varies based on need, the surplus contribution rate 𝛾 is
310
+ set as a constant parameter to observe the general trends. The wealth 𝑚𝑖(𝑡 + 1) and
311
+ 𝑚𝑗(𝑡+ 1) of two agents 𝑖 and 𝑗, respectively, are expressed as
312
+ 𝑚𝑖𝑛 = Min(𝑚𝑖(𝑡), 𝑚𝑗(𝑡)),
313
+ (4a)
314
+ 𝑚𝑎𝑥 = Max (𝑚𝑖(𝑡), 𝑚𝑗(𝑡)),
315
+ (4b)
316
+ 𝑖𝑓 𝑚𝑖(𝑡+ 1) ≤ 𝑚𝑗(𝑡 + 1),
317
+ 𝑚𝑖(𝑡 + 1) = 𝑚𝑖(𝑡) − (1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝑚𝑖𝑛
318
+ +𝜀 ∙ (1 − 𝜆) ∙ (2 ∙ 𝑚𝑖𝑛 + 𝛾 ∙ (𝑚𝑎𝑥 − 𝑚𝑖𝑛));
319
+ (4c)
320
+ 𝑚𝑗(𝑡 + 1) = 𝑚𝑗(𝑡) − (1 − 𝜆) ∙ (𝑚𝑖𝑛 + 𝛾 ∙ (𝑚𝑎𝑥 − 𝑚𝑖𝑛))
321
+ +(1 − 𝜀) ∙ (1 − 𝜆) ∙ (2 ∙ 𝑚𝑖𝑛 + 𝛾 ∙ (𝑚𝑎𝑥 − 𝑚𝑖𝑛)).
322
+ (4d)
323
+ 𝑖𝑓 𝑚𝑖(𝑡+ 1) > 𝑚𝑗(𝑡 + 1),
324
+ 𝑚𝑖(𝑡 + 1) = 𝑚𝑖(𝑡) − (1 − 𝜆) ∙ (𝑚𝑖𝑛 + 𝛾 ∙ (𝑚𝑎𝑥 − 𝑚𝑖𝑛))
325
+ +𝜀 ∙ (1 − 𝜆) ∙ (2 ∙ 𝑚𝑖𝑛 + 𝛾 ∙ (𝑚𝑎𝑥 − 𝑚𝑖𝑛));
326
+ (4e)
327
+ ����𝑗(𝑡 + 1) = 𝑚𝑗(𝑡) − (1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝑚𝑖𝑛
328
+ +(1 − 𝜀) ∙ (1 − 𝜆) ∙ (2 ∙ 𝑚𝑖𝑛 + 𝛾 ∙ (𝑚𝑎𝑥 − 𝑚𝑖𝑛)).
329
+ (4f)
330
+ The NX model equals the nonequivalent exchange model shown in Equations (1a) and
331
+ (1b) when the surplus contribution rate 𝛾 = 1 and the equivalent exchange model
332
+ shown in Equations (2a)–(2c) when 𝛾 = 0.
333
+ 2.2. Evaluation Indices
334
+ 2.2.1 Gini Index
335
+ The Gini index 𝑔, used as a parameter for evaluating wealth inequality [28], is
336
+ obtained by drawing the Lorenz curve and equal distribution line [29]. Various proposed
337
+ inequality indices are calculated from Lorenz curves [30], but the Gini index is used here
338
+ because it is most common. Mathematically, the wealth 𝑚𝑖(𝑡) of the 𝑁 agents at time 𝑡
339
+ is ordered from the smallest to the largest, and the Gini index 𝑔 is calculated as
340
+ 𝑟𝑖(𝑡) = Sort(𝑚𝑖(𝑡)),
341
+ (5a)
342
+ 𝑔 = 2 ∙ ∑
343
+ 𝑖 ∙
344
+ 𝑁
345
+ 𝑖=1
346
+ 𝑟𝑖(𝑡)
347
+ 𝑁 ∙ ∑
348
+ 𝑟𝑖(𝑡)
349
+ 𝑁
350
+ 𝑖=1
351
+ − 𝑁 + 1
352
+ 𝑁
353
+ .
354
+ (5b)
355
+ When the wealth of 𝑁 agents is perfectly equal (uniform distribution), the Gini index
356
+ 𝑔 = 0; when all wealth is concentrated in a single agent’s hands (delta distribution), 𝑔 =
357
+ 1. In other words, 𝑔 ranges from 0 to 1. The greater the inequality, the larger the value
358
+ of 𝑔.
359
+
360
+
361
+
362
+ 7 of 17
363
+
364
+
365
+ 2.2.2 Total Exchange
366
+ The total exchange amount 𝑓 is used to evaluate economic flow [24]. The total
367
+ exchange 𝑓 is the sum of the exchanges of the wealthy and poor (1 − 𝜆) ∙ (2 ∙ min (𝑡) +
368
+ 𝛾 ∙ (𝑚𝑎𝑥(𝑡) − 𝑚𝑖𝑛(𝑡))) at time 𝑡 from time 𝑡 = 1 to 𝑡 = 𝑡𝑚𝑎𝑥.
369
+ 𝑓 =
370
+
371
+ (1 − 𝜆) ∙ (2 ∙ 𝑚𝑖𝑛(𝑡) + 𝛾 ∙ (𝑚𝑎𝑥(𝑡) − 𝑚𝑖𝑛(𝑡)))
372
+ 𝑡𝑚𝑎𝑥
373
+ 𝑡=1
374
+ 2 ∙ 𝑡𝑚𝑎𝑥
375
+ .
376
+ (6)
377
+ Furthermore, Equation (6) applies to Equations (2a)–(2c) if 𝛾 = 1. The denominator
378
+ in Equation (6), intended for normalization, is the total amount exchanged between the
379
+ two agents from time 𝑡 = 1 to 𝑡 = 𝑡𝑚𝑎𝑥, when the two agents exchange one amount each.
380
+ The larger the total exchange 𝑓, the more active the exchange of wealth, that is, the
381
+ economic flows are large and the market is active.
382
+ 3. Results
383
+ I first examine wealth distributions for the EX model of equivalent exchange and
384
+ redistribution represented by Equations (2a)–(2c) and (3) and the NX model of
385
+ nonequivalent exchange represented by Equations (4a)–(4f). Figure 2 shows a
386
+ representative example of the simulated wealth distribution results. I set a savings rate of
387
+ 𝜆 = 0.25 because the average global savings rate relative to the gross domestic product
388
+ (GDP) is approximately 0.25 [31], and a transfer rate of 𝜉 = 0.5 in the EX model because
389
+ the highest inheritance tax rate in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
390
+ Development (OECD) countries is approximately 0.5 [32,33].
391
+
392
+ Figure 2. Wealth distribution. (a1) and (a2) represent EX models, and (b1) and (b2) represent NX
393
+ models. In all models, the number of agents is 𝑁 = 1,000, the initial values of wealth at time 𝑡 = 0
394
+ are 𝑚𝑖(0) = 1 (𝑖 = 1, 2,⋯ ,𝑁), and the savings rate is 𝜆 = 0.25. In the EX model, the transfer rate
395
+ is 𝜉 = 0.5, and the time period is 𝑡𝑝 = 104,105. In the NX model, the surplus contribution rate is
396
+ 𝛾 = 0.1, 0.5 . To determine the changes in wealth distribution, the time (number of exchange
397
+ repetitions) is 𝑡 = 103, 3 × 103,106.
398
+
399
+ (a1) EX model
400
+ (b1) NX model
401
+ N = 1,000,^ = 0.25, = 0.5,t, = 104
402
+ 200
403
+ N=1,000,A=0.25.y=0.1
404
+ 300
405
+ 250
406
+ t = 106
407
+ 150
408
+ Frequency
409
+ t = 106
410
+ 200
411
+ t = 3 × 103
412
+ t = 3 × 103
413
+ 100
414
+ 150
415
+ t = 103
416
+ t = 103
417
+ 100
418
+ 50
419
+ 50
420
+ 0.5
421
+ 1.0
422
+ 1.5
423
+ 2.0
424
+ 2.5
425
+ 3.0
426
+ 0.5
427
+ 1.0
428
+ 1.5
429
+ 2.0
430
+ 2.5
431
+ 3.0
432
+ Wealth m; (t)
433
+ Wealth m; (t)
434
+ (a2) EX model
435
+ (b2) NX model
436
+ N = 1,000,^ = 0.25, = 0.5,tp = 105
437
+ 200
438
+ N= 1,000,^= 0.25,y= 0.5
439
+ 800
440
+ t = 106
441
+ 150
442
+ 600
443
+ Frequency
444
+ t = 106
445
+ t = 3× 103
446
+ t = 3 × 103
447
+ 400
448
+ 100
449
+ t = 103
450
+ t = 103
451
+ 200
452
+ 50
453
+ 0
454
+ oF
455
+ 0.5
456
+ 1.0
457
+ 1.5
458
+ 2.0
459
+ 2.5
460
+ 3.0
461
+ 0.5
462
+ 1.0
463
+ 1.5
464
+ 2.0
465
+ 2.5
466
+ 3.0
467
+ Wealth m; (t)
468
+ Wealth m;(t)
469
+ 8 of 17
470
+
471
+
472
+ A comparison of Figures 2 (a1) and (a2) reveals that as the wealth distribution in the
473
+ EX model approaches a power distribution, a delta distribution with an increase in the
474
+ redistribution period 𝑡𝑝 = 104 to 105 occurs—that is, inequality increases. This implies
475
+ that some form of redistribution must be conducted because only equivalent exchange
476
+ leads to extreme inequality, as suggested by the literature [21] with respect to regional
477
+ inequality. A comparison of Figures 2 (b1) and (b2) shows that the wealth distribution
478
+ approaches a gamma-like distribution from an exponential distribution in the NX model
479
+ when the wealthy’s surplus contribution rate increases from 𝛾 = 0.1 to 0.5, that is, the
480
+ inequality narrows. This suggests that inequality can be controlled if considerable mutual
481
+ aid is provided in a nonequivalent exchange.
482
+ Next, I examine the change in the Gini index (inequality) 𝑔 over time (number of
483
+ exchanges) 𝑡 for the EX and NX models by Equations (5a) and (5b). Figure 3 shows the
484
+ results of these simulations.
485
+
486
+ Figure 3. Gini index on time passage. The number of agents is 𝑁 = 1,000, initial values of wealth at
487
+ time 𝑡 = 0 are 𝑚𝑖(0) = 1 (𝑖 = 1,2,⋯ ,𝑁), and the savings rate is 𝜆 = 0.25. In the EX model, the
488
+ transfer rate is 𝜉 = 0 and 0.5, and the time period is 𝑡𝑝 = 103,104, 105. In the NX model, the
489
+ surplus contribution rate is 𝛾 = 0, 0.1, 0.5,1.
490
+ In Figure 3, cases 𝜉 = 0 (i.e., no redistribution in the EX model) and 𝛾 = 0 (i.e., no
491
+ mutual aid in the NX model) are identical; as time 𝑡 passes, the Gini index approaches
492
+ 𝑔 = 1, and all wealth is concentrated in one agent’s hands. In other words, in an equivalent
493
+ market exchange, inequality can only be maximized. In the EX model with 𝜉 = 0.5, the
494
+ redistribution period 𝑡𝑝 = 105 to 103 is shortened. In the NX model, the Gini index 𝑔
495
+ decreases and inequality is suppressed when the rate of surplus contribution from the rich
496
+ to the poor increases from 𝛾 = 0 to 𝛾 = 0.5; however, 𝛾 = 0.5 and 𝛾 = 1 show little
497
+ difference. The reason the Gini index saturates with respect to 𝛾 is presumably because
498
+ the shape of the Lorenz curve itself, which calculates the Gini index 𝑔, does not change,
499
+ although the wealthy and poor switch as 𝛾 increases, as discussed in the literature [24]
500
+ regarding the rank correlation coefficient.
501
+ In Figures 2 and 3, the savings rate 𝜆 = 0.25 is held constant. Subsequently, I
502
+ examine the Gini index (inequality) 𝑔 by Equations (5a) and (5b) and total exchange
503
+ (economic flow) 𝑓 by Equation (6) for the savings rate 𝜆 and the redistribution
504
+ parameter 𝜉 𝑡𝑝 × 10−3
505
+
506
+ of the EX model and for the savings rate 𝜆 and the surplus
507
+ contribution rate (mutual aid) 𝛾 of the NX model. 𝜉 𝑡𝑝 × 10−3
508
+
509
+ is introduced because the
510
+ same inequality suppression effect is expected for an increase in the transfer rate 𝜉 and a
511
+ decrease in the period 𝑡𝑝; the × 10−3 is used for adjusting the computational orders of
512
+ magnitude. Figure 4 shows the results of these simulations. The time (number of
513
+ exchanges) 𝑡 is set to 106, at which the Gini index 𝑔 is almost stable, as shown in Figure
514
+ 3.
515
+
516
+ 1.0 [
517
+ EX:=0,NX:y=0
518
+ N=1,000,入=0.25
519
+ EX: = 0.5,tp = 105
520
+ 0.8
521
+ 6
522
+ EX: = 0.5,tp = 104
523
+ Gini index g
524
+ 0.6
525
+ NX:= 0.1
526
+ NX:Y=0.5
527
+ 0.4
528
+ NX: =1
529
+ 0.2
530
+ EX: = 0.5,tp = 103
531
+ 103
532
+ 104
533
+ 105
534
+ 106
535
+ Time(exchangecounts)t
536
+ 9 of 17
537
+
538
+
539
+
540
+ Figure 4. Three-dimensional graphs of Gini index 𝑔 and total exchange 𝑓 for saving rate 𝜆 and
541
+ redistribution parameter 𝜉 𝑡𝑝 × 10−3
542
+
543
+ or mutual aid 𝛾. (a) EX model and (b) NX model.
544
+ The comparison of Figures 4 (a) and (b) reveals the same trend for both EX and NX
545
+ models. In the EX model, the larger the savings rate 𝜆, the smaller is the Gini index 𝑔
546
+ (inequality is suppressed) and the smaller is the total exchange 𝑓 (economic flow is
547
+ reduced). Furthermore, the larger the redistribution parameter 𝜉 𝑡𝑝 × 10−3
548
+
549
+ , the smaller
550
+ is the 𝑔 (inequality is suppressed) but the larger is the total exchange 𝑓 (economic flow
551
+ is activated). Figure 4 (b) shows that in the NX model, the larger the savings rate 𝜆, the
552
+ smaller are the 𝑔 (inequality is suppressed) and 𝑓 (economic flow becomes stagnant).
553
+ Moreover, the larger the mutual aid 𝛾, the smaller is the 𝑔 (inequality is suppressed) and
554
+ the larger is the 𝑓 (economic flow is activated). In other words, inequality 𝑔 and
555
+ economic flows 𝑓 are inversely related with respect to the redistribution parameter
556
+ 𝜉 𝑡𝑝 × 10−3
557
+
558
+ in the EX model and mutual aid 𝛾 in the NX model.
559
+ As specific values are difficult to read in Figure 4, I examine the Gini index 𝑔 for the
560
+ redistribution parameter 𝜉 𝑡𝑝 × 10−3
561
+
562
+ of the EX model and the surplus contribution rate
563
+ (mutual aid) 𝛾 of the NX model. Figure 5 shows the results of these simulations based on
564
+ Figures 2–4.
565
+ Figure 5. Relationship of Gini index 𝑔 for the redistribution parameter 𝜉 𝑡𝑝 × 10−3
566
+
567
+ or mutual aid
568
+ 𝛾. (a) EX model and (b) NX model. In both models, dotted lines represent approximate curves.
569
+ Figures 5 (a) and (b) show that, as in Figure 4, the larger the redistribution parameter
570
+ 𝜉 𝑡𝑝 × 10−3
571
+
572
+ in the EX model and the mutual aid 𝛾 in the NX model, the smaller is the
573
+ Gini index 𝑔 (inequality is reduced). In addition, both plots are accurately approximated
574
+ by the saturation curve (dotted line in the figure) because the coefficient of determination
575
+ 𝑅2 is sufficiently large. At a global average savings rate 𝜆 = 0.25 [31], the redistribution
576
+ parameter and the mutual aid must be as follows: 𝜉 𝑡𝑝 × 10−3
577
+
578
+ ≥ 0.2 in the EX model and
579
+ 𝛾 ≥ 0.2 in the NX model, respectively, to avoid exceeding the warning level 𝑔 = 0.4 [3].
580
+ In other words, Figure 5 suggests that without a certain degree of redistribution or mutual
581
+
582
+ (a) EX model
583
+ (b) NX model
584
+ 1.01
585
+ N=1,000,t=106,a=0.25
586
+ 1.0
587
+ N=1,000.t=106a=0.25
588
+ 0.8
589
+ 0.8
590
+ -
591
+ 9
592
+ 6
593
+ g~1-0.643
594
+ g~1- 0.595(1-e-19.2y)
595
+ Giniindex
596
+ 0.6
597
+ Gini index
598
+ 0.6
599
+ R2=0.994
600
+ R²=0.995
601
+ 0.4
602
+ 0.4
603
+ 0.2
604
+ 0.2
605
+ 0.2
606
+ 0.4
607
+ 0.6
608
+ 0.8
609
+ 1.0
610
+ 0.2
611
+ 0.4
612
+ 0.6
613
+ 0.8
614
+ 1.0
615
+ 5
616
+ Redistribution
617
+ Mutual aid y
618
+ tp×10-3(a) EX model
619
+ (b) NX model
620
+ N=1,000,t=106
621
+ Totalexchangef
622
+ Totalexchangef
623
+ 1.0
624
+ 1.0
625
+ 1.0
626
+ 1.0
627
+ Value0.5
628
+ Gini index g
629
+ Value 0.5
630
+ 0.0
631
+ 0.0F
632
+ Apie
633
+ 0.0
634
+ 0.5
635
+ 0.0
636
+ 0.5
637
+ Redistribution
638
+ Mutual
639
+ 0.5
640
+ 0.5
641
+ Saving^
642
+ Saving^
643
+ 0.0
644
+ 0.0
645
+ 1.0
646
+ 1.0
647
+ 10 of 17
648
+
649
+
650
+ aid, social unrest and disturbance will be triggered and Goal 10 of the Sustainable
651
+ Development Goals to reduce wealth inequality [6] will not be achieved.
652
+ Finally, based on the inversely proportional relationship between the Gini index 𝑔
653
+ and the total exchange 𝑓 in Figure 4, I introduce the parameter 𝑓 𝑔
654
+ ⁄ . Then, I examine the
655
+ relationship of 𝑓 𝑔
656
+ ⁄ to the redistribution parameter 𝜉 𝑡𝑝 × 10−3
657
+
658
+ in the EX model and to
659
+ the parameter (1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝛾, comprising the savings rate 𝜆 and the surplus contribution
660
+ rate (mutual aid) 𝛾, in the NX model. I introduce the parameter (1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝛾 in the NX
661
+ model because reducing the savings rate 𝜆 and increasing the surplus contribution rate
662
+ 𝛾 are believed to increase the unitary exchange and mutual aid per exchange. In contrast,
663
+ in the EX model, the transfer rate 𝜉 is multiplied by the entire wealth, including savings,
664
+ in every period 𝑡𝑝; thus, the effect of redistribution is considered independent of the
665
+ savings rate 𝜆. Figure 6 shows these simulation results.
666
+ Figure 6. Relationship of the 𝑓 𝑔
667
+ ⁄ parameter for the redistribution parameter 𝜉 𝑡𝑝 × 10−3
668
+
669
+ or
670
+ mutual aid (1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝛾. (a) EX model and (b) NX model. In both models, dotted lines represent
671
+ approximate curves.
672
+ Figures 6 (a) and (b) show that the parameter 𝑓 𝑔
673
+ ⁄ increases as 𝜉 𝑡𝑝 × 10−3
674
+
675
+ and
676
+ (1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝛾 are increased for the EX and NX models, respectively. Furthermore, both plots
677
+ are accurately approximated by the saturation curves (dotted lines in the figure) because
678
+ the coefficient of determination 𝑅2 are larger than 0.9. The EX and NX models yield
679
+ 𝑓 𝑔
680
+ ⁄ ~0.241 ln𝜉 𝑡𝑝 × 10−3
681
+
682
+ + 1.48 (𝑅2 = 0.779) and 𝑓 𝑔
683
+ ⁄ ~0.403 ln(1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝛾 + 1.92 (𝑅2 =
684
+ 0.937), respectively, when approximated by logarithmic curves. The NX model results
685
+ indicate that the logarithmic curves can be approximated with adequate accuracy, which
686
+ is consistent with the view in the literature [24]. In Figure 6, I compare the EX and NX
687
+ models using saturation curves that can be accurately approximated because both have
688
+ sufficiently large 𝑅2. It is safe to say that both approximations are isomorphic and that
689
+ 𝑓
690
+ 𝑔 ~2(1 − 𝑒−5𝑥),
691
+ (7a)
692
+ 𝑥~
693
+ 𝜉
694
+ 𝑡𝑝 × 10−3 ~(1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝛾.
695
+ (7b)
696
+ holds. Therefore, the redistribution parameter 𝜉 𝑡𝑝 × 10−3
697
+
698
+ in an equivalent exchange
699
+ and the mutual aid (1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝛾 that considers savings in a nonequivalent exchange yield
700
+ roughly the same result with respect to the parameter 𝑓 𝑔
701
+ ⁄ . The approximate equations
702
+ shown in Figure 6 and Equations (7a) and (7b) imply that if the right side has a constant
703
+ value, the Gini index (inequality) 𝑔 and the total exchange (economic flow) 𝑓 on the left
704
+ side are inversely proportional, that is, activating economic flow will increase inequality.
705
+ Additionally, it is necessary to increase 𝜉 𝑡𝑝 × 10−3
706
+
707
+ and (1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝛾 on the right side for
708
+ the EX and NX models, respectively, to increase 𝑓 𝑔
709
+ ⁄ on the left side (i.e., to increase the
710
+ total exchange 𝑓 while decreasing the Gini index 𝑔). Moreover, redistribution must
711
+
712
+ (a) EX model
713
+ (b) NX model
714
+ N = 1,000, t = 106
715
+ N=1,000,t=106
716
+ 2.0
717
+ 2.0
718
+ 1.5
719
+ 1.5
720
+ f-g
721
+ f
722
+ 92
723
+ 1.93(1 - e-5.59(1-)-)
724
+ 1.0
725
+ g
726
+ 1.0
727
+ 6
728
+ R2 = 0.968
729
+ R2 = 0.989
730
+ 0.5
731
+ 0.5
732
+ 0.0
733
+ 0.2
734
+ 0.4
735
+ 0.6
736
+ 0.8
737
+ 1.0
738
+ 0.0
739
+ 0.2
740
+ 0.4
741
+ 0.6
742
+ 0.8
743
+ 1.0
744
+ Sr
745
+ (1 - a) ·
746
+ tp × 10-3
747
+ 11 of 17
748
+
749
+
750
+ either occur with a high transfer rate 𝜉 and a short period 𝑡𝑝 or with a low saving rate
751
+ 𝜆 and considerable mutual aid 𝛾 to simultaneously reduce inequality and stimulate
752
+ economic flow.
753
+ The numerical values presented in Figure 6 (a) indicate that the redistribution
754
+ parameters 𝜉 𝑡𝑝 × 10−3
755
+
756
+ ~1 and 𝑓 𝑔
757
+ ⁄ ~2 are at the saturation point of the EX model. At
758
+ this point, the periods 𝑡𝑝~1,000, 𝑡𝑝~800, and 𝑡𝑝~500 should be set for transfer rates
759
+ 𝜉~1, 𝜉~0.8, and 𝜉~0.5, respectively. Given the results in Figure 3, this is tantamount to
760
+ redistributing wealth before wealth distribution occurs, which is not realistic. If the target
761
+ is 𝜉 𝑡𝑝 × 10−3
762
+
763
+ ~0.2, where 𝑓 𝑔
764
+ ⁄ does not drop considerably on the saturation curve,
765
+ 𝑡𝑝~5,000 for 𝜉~1, 𝑡𝑝~3,000 for 𝜉~0.6, and 𝑡𝑝~2,000 for 𝜉~0.4; this seems feasible
766
+ within the range of the latter two, that is, 𝜉~0.5 and 𝑡𝑝~2,500.
767
+ Based on the numerical values presented in Figure 6 (b), the saturation point of the
768
+ NX model is (1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝛾 = 1 and 𝑓 𝑔
769
+
770
+ ~2. The savings rate 𝜆 = 0 and the surplus
771
+ contribution rate 𝛾 = 1 should be set at this point; however, it is unrealistic for the
772
+ wealthy to always contribute the entirety of their surplus wealth, and for the poor and the
773
+ wealthy to always save no wealth, respectively. The latter is because they must save to
774
+ maintain long-term future reserves and meet contingent expenditures attributable to
775
+ disasters. If the target is (1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝛾~0.2, where 𝑓 𝑔
776
+ ⁄ does not drop considerably on the
777
+ saturation curve, 𝛾~1 for 𝜆~0.8, 𝛾~0.33 for 𝜆~0.4, and 𝛾~0.25 for 𝜆~0.2; it would be
778
+ feasible to achieve 𝜆~0.3 and 𝛾~0.28 within the range of the last two considering the
779
+ global average savings rate of 0.25 [31].
780
+ Figure 7 shows the relationship between redistribution and mutual aid based on
781
+ Equations (7a) and (7b). The circle represents the tentative target. Lengthening the period
782
+ of redistribution from 𝑡𝑝 = 2,500 to 5,000 results in a transfer ratio 𝜉~1 , that is,
783
+ transferring all assets and further lengthening the period would no longer maintain the
784
+ same 𝑓 𝑔
785
+ ⁄ as the mutual aid, and this would lead to economic stagnation or widening
786
+ inequality. Conversely, if the redistribution period is shortened from 𝑡𝑝 = 2,500 to
787
+ 1,250,625 , the transfer rate decreases to 𝜉~ 0.25, 0.125, which necessitates frequent
788
+ redistributions.
789
+
790
+ Figure 7. Relationship between redistribution parameter 𝜉 and mutual aid 𝛾. The savings rate is
791
+ 𝜆 = 0.25, and the time period of redistribution is 𝑡𝑝 = 625,1,250,2,500,5,000.
792
+ 4. Discussion
793
+ This study compared a model combining equivalent exchange and redistribution
794
+ (Polanyi's market exchange, Graeber's exchange, and Karatani's mode of exchange C
795
+ combined with Polanyi's redistribution, Graeber's hierarchy, and Karatani's mode of
796
+ exchange B) and a mutual-aid nonequivalent exchange model (Graeber's baseline
797
+ communism and Karatani's mode of exchange D). This comparison reveals that both
798
+ produce the same computational interpretation of the results for wealth inequality and
799
+ economic flow. Reducing inequality and stimulating economic flow requires either
800
+
801
+ tp = 5,000
802
+ tp = 2,500
803
+ 1.0
804
+ tp = 1,250
805
+ Redistribution (transfer rate)
806
+ 0.8
807
+ 0.6
808
+ tp = 625
809
+ 0.4
810
+ 0.2
811
+ 入= 0.25
812
+ 0.0
813
+ 0.2
814
+ 0.4
815
+ 0.6
816
+ 0.8
817
+ 1.0
818
+ Mutual aid (surplus contribution rate)
819
+ 12 of 17
820
+
821
+
822
+ power-centered collection and redistribution at a high tax rate and frequency in an
823
+ equivalent market exchange or a mutual-aid nonequivalent exchange without obligation
824
+ of return, in which savings are kept low and the wealthy’s rate of surplus wealth
825
+ contribution is high.
826
+ What does the computational similarity of authoritative redistribution and
827
+ nonauthoritative mutual aid imply? With respect to time 𝑡 in these exchange models, a
828
+ human lifetime would be considered equivalent to approximately 104 order of
829
+ magnitude (~365 days x 100 years). Therefore, a redistribution target of 𝜉 𝑡𝑝 × 10−3
830
+
831
+ ~0.2
832
+ would mean that a tax of ~50% is levied once every few decades on all assets and not the
833
+ income. The maximum inheritance tax rate in OECD countries (i.e., once in a lifetime) is
834
+ 50% [32,33], which means that collection and redistribution should be conducted more
835
+ frequently. Expenses to the government are ~30% of GDP [34], and the collection and
836
+ redistribution of taxes by the power center is extra costly; furthermore, the institutional
837
+ design creates redistribution bias, that is, inequality.
838
+ In contrast, a mutual aid target of (1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝛾~0.2 implies that the wealthy
839
+ voluntarily give ~30% of their surplus stock to the poor in a single exchange, without
840
+ obligation to return, assuming an average saving rate 𝜆 = 0.25 [31]. Although a
841
+ prescribed surplus contribution rate 𝛾 is specified when modeling a mutual-aid
842
+ nonequivalent exchange, the original baseline communism or mode of exchange D only
843
+ requires that mutual aid be provided as required. In addition, even if redistribution and
844
+ mutual aid are “computationally” similar, they are “qualitatively” different in that
845
+ redistribution is coercion-based and driven by the centrality of power, whereas mutual
846
+ aid is a voluntary choice based on noncentrism and morality. Extrapersonal altruism and
847
+ compassion, as opposed to coercion, are believed to result in wellbeing [35]. Therefore, it
848
+ is evident that a mutual-aid nonequivalent exchange without obligation to return (the
849
+ alternative human economy) is preferable to redistribution by power centers in an
850
+ equivalent market exchange (capitalist economy and social security).
851
+ Here, examining the mechanism of the Islamic economy is instructive. As a legal
852
+ system, the Islamic economy encompasses politics, economics, and society and prohibits
853
+ interest (riba) and speculation (gharar), which lead to inequality. Furthermore, it also
854
+ successfully balances selfishness as the pursuit of self-interest through joint ventures
855
+ (mudaraba), consensual contracts (murabaha), and futures trading (salam) and altruism as
856
+ mutual aid through donation (waqf), alms (sadaqah), and charity (zakat) in an equal and
857
+ noncentered community (ummah) under God [36–38]. Redistribution through various
858
+ institutions according to the Islamic legal system, rather than coercion by power centers,
859
+ is more like a nonequivalent exchange of mutual aid.
860
+ According to Graeber, history over the past five millennia has alternated between
861
+ cycles of bullion-based monetary economies and virtual money-based credit economies
862
+ [9]. The monetary economic period is generally characterized by interest-bearing debt,
863
+ war, and slavery, whereas the credit economic period has witnessed a morally peaceful
864
+ society. In the Middle Ages, a credit economy era that predated the modern era, moral
865
+ and financial innovations emerged from the Islamic world. As the modern era transitions
866
+ from a monetary economy to a credit economy, the Islamic economy could, once again,
867
+ provide an alternative to the capitalist economy [39–41].
868
+ Kato compares the Islamic and capitalist economies from the econophysics
869
+ perspective; he proposes a return to a “real transaction-based economy” rooted in nature
870
+ and local communities, the promotion of a “face-to-face association economy,” and the
871
+ revival of an “economy embedded in the morality of mutual aid” as guidelines for a credit
872
+ economy as an alternative to capitalism [25]. He then states that the challenge in the non-
873
+ Islamic world lies not in redistribution through taxes collected under centralized power
874
+ but in mutual aid through one’s free choice under the community’s noncentrality and in
875
+ the rebuilding of the morality of mutual aid, that is, without a specific religion.
876
+ These guidelines can be considered to be oriented toward anarchism. Anarchism is
877
+ an ideology wherein individual freedom and communal solidarity are not contradictory.
878
+
879
+
880
+ 13 of 17
881
+
882
+
883
+ It seeks to build a free and equal society through mutual agreement. Graeber and Grubacic
884
+ define anarchism in terms of four qualities: noncentrality, voluntary association, mutual
885
+ aid, and the network model [42]. Graeber's baseline communism and Karatani's mode of
886
+ exchange D, which are represented in this nonequivalent exchange model, are oriented
887
+ toward anarchism as they both aim for a human economy in which free exchange occurs
888
+ while incorporating the morality of mutual aid [43].
889
+ Philosopher Deguchi describes the East Asian view of the self, “Self-as-We,” which
890
+ is connected to the lineage of Laozhuang and Zen thought, as opposed to the Western
891
+ view of self, “Self-as-I” [44–46]. According to Deguchi, human beings have a
892
+ “fundamental incapability” to live alone, and “Self-as-We” is a network of multi-agents—
893
+ including “I”—who entrust themselves to each other. The “mixed-life society” in which
894
+ “we” live is one in which different self-nomadic people interact, mingle, and remain in
895
+ contact, recognizing each other's “fundamental incapability” and sublimating it into
896
+ solidarity. Deguchi's ideology also underlies Graeber's baseline communism, Karatani's
897
+ mode D of exchange, and the face-to-face association economy based on real transactions
898
+ in the morality of mutual aid.
899
+ Another perspective is the triangle “state (public agencies)–community–market
900
+ (private firms)” presented by political scientist Pestoff [47]; the “public (state)–common
901
+ (community)–private (market)" framework presented by policy scholar Hiroi [48,49]; and
902
+ the three pillars “state, community, market” presented by economist Rajan [50]. The state
903
+ corresponds to Polanyi’s redistribution, Graeber’s hierarchy, and Karatani’s mode of
904
+ exchange B; the community corresponds to Polanyi’s reciprocity and Karatani’s mode of
905
+ exchange A; and the market corresponds to Polanyi’s market exchange, Graeber’s
906
+ exchange, and Karatani’s mode of exchange C. Thus, Pestoff's association at the center of
907
+ the triangle, Hiroi's synthesis of “public–community–private” and the departure from the
908
+ local level, and the balance between Rajan's three pillars is oriented toward Graeber's
909
+ baseline communism and Karatani's mode of exchange D.
910
+ In recent work, Karatani notes that the mode of exchange D has emerged repeatedly
911
+ through the return of mode of exchange A (reciprocity and return) at a higher level, not
912
+ as a world religion such as a monotheistic religion supporting the empire but as a
913
+ universal religion emerging on the periphery in defiance of the empire. He also states that
914
+ because of the crises of war and depression induced by modes of exchange B (imperial
915
+ plunder and redistribution) and C (money and commodity exchange), mode of exchange
916
+ D will arrive “from beyond” human will and planning [51].
917
+ Historian Sheidel states that human history has witnessed wars, revolutions, collapse
918
+ of states, and epidemics decrease economic inequality [52]. Currently, the world is
919
+ suffering from the COVID-19 pandemic, war in Ukraine, and natural disasters and
920
+ conflicts caused by the effects of global warming. Although these crises are unfortunate,
921
+ they may hasten the arrival of mode of exchange D and facilitate the transition from a
922
+ capitalist economy to alternatives as suggested by Graeber and Karatani.
923
+ This study is limited in that it compares general trends in redistribution and mutual
924
+ aid, that the same transfer rate 𝜉 and period 𝑡𝑝 is set for all agents in the EX model, and
925
+ that the same surplus contribution rate 𝛾 is set for all agents in the NX model. Future
926
+ analytical studies should be conducted in more detail, for example, by setting the transfer
927
+ rate 𝜉 and period 𝑡𝑝 in the EX model based on various social security programs and by
928
+ choosing the surplus contribution rate 𝛾 in the NX model according to the ability of the
929
+ wealthy and the needs of the poor. Moreover, empirical studies are needed that use real-
930
+ world evidence to examine the relationship between economic flow and Gini index with
931
+ respect to tax rate and frequency for the EX model, and with respect to stock and surplus
932
+ contribution of the wealthy for the NX model.
933
+ In addition, this study uses a conservative model for aggregate wealth that deals only
934
+ with exchange. Therefore, it does not deal with production and consumption, or interest
935
+ and profit/loss in the real-world economy [13]. With respect to interest and profit/loss,
936
+ there is a non-conservative model introduced by Kato in comparison of Islamic and
937
+
938
+
939
+ 14 of 17
940
+
941
+
942
+ capitalist economies [25]. In a future study, the redistribution or mutual aid of interest and
943
+ profit/loss for the wealthy and the poor can be considered in such a non-conservative
944
+ model.
945
+ It should be added that, although the present study used a model based on the kinetic
946
+ energy exchange analogy, there is another model that uses potential function to compute
947
+ probability distributions for income and expenditure [53], and a model that uses
948
+ population dynamics to compute time developments for growth and inequality [54].
949
+ Future research could thus include such models that take into account the finiteness of
950
+ earth resources and the sustainability of economy. Such non-conservative models are
951
+ subject to the constraint of resource limits, however, and eventually researchers may wish
952
+ to revert to a conservative model that is primarily based on exchange.
953
+ 5. Conclusions
954
+ In this study, I develop econophysical exchange models for a hybrid of a market-
955
+ based equivalent exchange (EX) and power-centered redistribution and a mutual-aid
956
+ nonequivalent exchange (NX). I also compare redistribution and mutual aid in terms of
957
+ wealth inequality and economic flow.
958
+ Simulations conducted using these exchange models to evaluate the Gini index
959
+ (inequality) 𝑔 and total exchange (economic flow) 𝑓 show that in both the EX and NX
960
+ models, the larger the savings rate 𝜆, the more the inequality is suppressed and economic
961
+ flows stagnate. Furthermore, the larger the synthetic parameters 𝜉 𝑡𝑝 × 10−3
962
+
963
+ and
964
+ (1 − 𝜆) ∙ 𝛾 in the EX and NX models, respectively, the more the inequality is suppressed
965
+ and economic flows are activated. I show that the EX and NX models have the same
966
+ saturated curvilinear approximation equations 𝑓 𝑔
967
+ ⁄ ~2 ∙ (1 − 𝑒−5𝑥),𝑥~𝜉 𝑡𝑝 × 10−3
968
+
969
+ ~(1 −
970
+ 𝜆) ∙ 𝛾 for these relationships. This approximate expression indicates that inequality and
971
+ economic flows are inversely proportional and that the parameter 𝑥 must be large to
972
+ achieve both.
973
+ Although the EX and NX models are “computationally” isomorphic approximations,
974
+ the NX model of mutual-aid nonequivalent exchange, is “qualitatively” preferable to the
975
+ EX model, a hybrid of market equivalence exchange and power redistribution. This is
976
+ indicative of Graeber’s baseline communism, Karatani’s mode D of exchange, a face-to-
977
+ face association economy based on real transactions as learned from the Islamic economy,
978
+ and the ideals of anarchism.
979
+ Notwithstanding the fact that mutual aid is “qualitatively” preferable to
980
+ redistribution, there remain issues that are beyond the scope of this study’s econophysical
981
+ approach: the reconstruction of a moral system in the non-Islamic world that is not based
982
+ on any particular religion; the realization of a “mixed-life society” of “We” with
983
+ “fundamental incapability;” and the incorporation of Graeber's stated capitalist economic
984
+ alternative and Karatani’s mode of exchange D. Future social practice activities based on
985
+ philosophy, economics, and sociology should focus on addressing these issues.
986
+ Specifically, in order to shift steadily from redistribution toward mutual aid—that is,
987
+ toward Pestoff's association and Hiroi's synthesis of "public-community-private"
988
+ described in the Discussion section—mutual-aid communities could be built through
989
+ cooperatives [55] and social enterprises [56,57] using environmental, social, and
990
+ governance investing [58] as well as social impact bonds [59]. Such cooperatives and social
991
+ enterprises will require governmental policies that provide them with preferential
992
+ taxation and financial resources. They will also need to be administrated in a way that
993
+ allows for the delegation of authority and lateral support. Still, though the progress
994
+ toward social innovation will always be confronted by various social challenges [60], we
995
+ must nevertheless reduce inequalities. This may be achieved in the future through the
996
+ fusion of human society and information systems, such as platform democracy [61],
997
+ platform cooperatives [62], and cyber-human social cooperating systems [63].
998
+
999
+
1000
+ 15 of 17
1001
+
1002
+
1003
+ Funding: This work was supported by JSPS Topic-Setting Program to Advance Cutting-Edge
1004
+ Humanities and Social Sciences Research Grant Number JPJS00122679495.
1005
+ Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
1006
+ Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.
1007
+ Acknowledgments: I am deeply grateful to Professor Yasuo Deguchi of the Graduate School of
1008
+ Letters, Kyoto University, whose ideas of “Self-as-We,” “fundamental incapability,” and “mixed-
1009
+ life society” directly motivated this study. I would also like to express my deepest gratitude to
1010
+ Professor Yoshinori Hiroi of the Institute for the Future of Human Society, Kyoto University, for his
1011
+ useful recommendations on post-capitalism, sustainable welfare society, and the economy of
1012
+ mutual aid. Furthermore, I would also like to thank my colleagues at the Hitachi Kyoto University
1013
+ Laboratory of the Kyoto University Open Innovation Institute for their ongoing cooperation, and
1014
+ thank Dr. Bismark Addai and Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.
1015
+ Conflicts of Interest: The author declares no conflict of interest.
1016
+ References
1017
+ 1.
1018
+ Peterson, E.W.F. Is economic inequality really a problem? A review of the arguments. Soc. Sci. 2017, 6, 147.
1019
+ DOI:10.3390/socsci6040147.
1020
+ 2.
1021
+ Chancel, L.; Piketty, T.; Saez, E.; Zucman, G., et al. World Inequality Report 2022.; World Inequality Lab.
1022
+ Available
1023
+ online:
1024
+ https://wir2022.wid.world/www-site/uploads/2022/03/0098-
1025
+ 21_WIL_RIM_RAPPORT_A4.pdf (accessed on 16 November 2022).
1026
+ 3.
1027
+ United Nations Habitat. State of the World’s Cities 2008/2009 –Harmonious Cities; Earthscan Publications:
1028
+ London,
1029
+ UK,
1030
+ 2008.
1031
+ Available
1032
+ online:
1033
+ https://unhabitat.org/state-of-the-worlds-cities-20082009-
1034
+ harmonious-cities-2 (accessed on 16 November 2022).
1035
+ 4.
1036
+ The World Bank. Gini Index. Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI
1037
+ (accessed on 16 November 2022).
1038
+ 5.
1039
+ Saadi, T.; Xu, R. A vicious cycle: How pandemics lead to economic despair and social unrest. IMF Working
1040
+ Paper. 2020, 216. Available online: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2020/10/16/A-Vicious-
1041
+ Cycle-How-Pandemics-Lead-to-Economic-Despair-and-Social-Unrest-49806 (accessed on 11 December
1042
+ 2022).
1043
+ 6.
1044
+ United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Sustainable Development. Available online:
1045
+ https://sdgs.un.org/ (accessed on 16 November 2022).
1046
+ 7.
1047
+ United Nations University. The impact of inequality on growth, human development, and governance.
1048
+ Available online: https://www.wider.unu.edu/project/impact-inequality-growth-human-development-
1049
+ and-governance-equal (accessed on 10 December 2022).
1050
+ 8.
1051
+ Polanyi, K. The Livelihood of Man; Academic Press: New York, USA, 1977.
1052
+ 9.
1053
+ Graeber, D. Debt: The First 5000 Years; Melville House: New York, USA, 2011.
1054
+ 10. Karatani, K. The Structure of World History: From Modes of Production to Modes of Exchange; Duke University
1055
+ Press: Durham, USA, 2014.
1056
+ 11. Chakrabarti, A.S.; Chakrabarti, B.K. Statistical theories of income and wealth distribution. Economics. 2010,
1057
+ 4, 1–31. DOI:10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2010-4.
1058
+ 12. Rosser, J.B., Jr. Econophysics and the entropic foundations of economics. Entropy. 2021, 23, 1286. DOI:
1059
+ 10.3390/e23101286.
1060
+ 13. Ribeiro, M.B. Income Distribution Dynamics of Economic Systems: An Econophysical Approach; Cambridge
1061
+ University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2020.
1062
+ 14. Champernowne, D.G. A model of income distribution. Econ. J. 1953, 63, 318–351. DOI:10.2307/2227127.
1063
+ 15. Angle, J. The surplus theory of social stratification and the size distribution of personal wealth. Soc. Forces.
1064
+ 1986, 65, 293–326. DOI:10.2307/2578675.
1065
+ 16. Dragulescu, A.; Yakovenko, V.M. Statistical mechanics of money. Eur. Phys. J. B. 2000, 17, 723–729.
1066
+ DOI:10.1007/s100510070114.
1067
+ 17. Chakraborti, A. Distributions of money in model markets of economy. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C. 2002, 13, 1315–
1068
+ 1321. DOI:10.1142/S0129183102003905.
1069
+ 18. Hayes, B. Follow the Money. Am. Sci. 2002, 90, 400–405. Available online: http://bit-player.org/wp-
1070
+ content/extras/bph-publications/AmSci-2002-09-Hayes-money.pdf (accessed on 16 November 2022).
1071
+ 19. Chatterjee, A.; Chakrabarti, B.K. Kinetic exchange models for income and wealth distributions. Eur. Phys.
1072
+ J. B. 2007, 60, 135–149. DOI:10.1140/epjb/e2007-00343-8.
1073
+
1074
+
1075
+ 16 of 17
1076
+
1077
+
1078
+ 20. Chakraborti, A.; Chakrabarti, B.K. Statistical mechanics of money: How saving propensity affects its
1079
+ distribution. Eur. Phys. J. B. 2000, 17, 167–170. DOI:10.1007/s100510070173.
1080
+ 21. Kato, T.; Kudo, Y.; Mizuno, H.; Hiroi, Y. Regional inequality simulations based on asset exchange models
1081
+ with exchange range and local support bias. Appl. Econ. Fin. 2020, 7, 10–23. DOI:10.11114/aef.v7i5.4945.
1082
+ 22. Guala, S. Taxes in a wealth distribution model by inelastically scattering of particles. Interdiscip. Descript.
1083
+ Complex Syst. 2009, 7, 1–7. Available online: https://www.indecs.eu/2009/indecs2009-pp1-7.pdf (accessed
1084
+ on 16 November 2022).
1085
+ 23. Chakrabarti, A.S.; Chakrabarti, B.K. Microeconomics of the ideal gas like market models. Phys. A. 2009,
1086
+ 388, 4151–4158. DOI:10.1016/j.physa.2009.06.038.
1087
+ 24. Kato, T.; Hiroi, Y. Wealth disparities and economic flow: Assessment using an asset exchange model with
1088
+ the surplus stock of the wealthy. PLOS ONE. 2021, 16, e0259323. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0259323.
1089
+ 25. Kato, T. Islamic and capitalist economies: Comparison using econophysics models of wealth exchange and
1090
+ redistribution. PLOS ONE. 2022, 17, e0275113. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0275113.
1091
+ 26. Iglesias, J.R. How simple regulations can greatly reduce inequality. Sci. Cult. 2010, 76, 437–443. Available
1092
+ online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1007.0461v2 (accessed on 11 December 2022).
1093
+ 27. Lima, H.; Vieira, A.R.; Anteneodo, C. Nonlinear redistribution of wealth from a stochastic approach. Chaos
1094
+ Solit. Fractals. 2022, 163, 112578. DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112578.
1095
+ 28. Gini, C. Measurement of inequality of incomes. Econ. J. 1921, 31, 124–126. DOI: 10.2307/2223319.
1096
+ 29. Xu, K. How has the literature on Gini’s index evolved in the past 80 years? SSRN J. 2003.
1097
+ DOI:10.2139/ssrn.423200.
1098
+ 30. Toscani, G. On Fourier-based inequality indices. Entropy. 2022, 24, 1393. DOI: 10.3390/e24101393.
1099
+ 31. The
1100
+ World
1101
+ Bank.
1102
+ Gross
1103
+ Savings
1104
+ (%
1105
+ of
1106
+ GDP).
1107
+ Available
1108
+ online:
1109
+ https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GNS.ICTR.ZS (accessed on 19 November 2022).
1110
+ 32. OECD.
1111
+ Inheritance
1112
+ Taxation
1113
+ in
1114
+ OECD
1115
+ Countries;
1116
+ OECD
1117
+ Publishing:
1118
+ Paris,
1119
+ France,
1120
+ 2021.
1121
+ DOI:10.1787/e2879a7d-en.
1122
+ 33. Cole,
1123
+ A.
1124
+ Estate
1125
+ and
1126
+ Inheritance
1127
+ Taxes
1128
+ Around
1129
+ the
1130
+ World;
1131
+ 2015.
1132
+ Available
1133
+ online:
1134
+ https://taxfoundation.org/estate-and-inheritance-taxes-around-world/ (accessed on 17 November 2022).
1135
+ 34. The
1136
+ World
1137
+ Bank.
1138
+ Expense
1139
+ (%
1140
+ of
1141
+ GDP).
1142
+ Available
1143
+ online:
1144
+ https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GC.XPN.TOTL.GD.ZS (accessed on 17 November 2022).
1145
+ 35. Calvo, R.A.; Peters, D. Positive Computing: Technology for Wellbeing and Human Potential; The MIT Press:
1146
+ Cambridge, USA, 2014.
1147
+ 36. Nagaoka, S. The future of capitalism and the Islamic economy. In The Kyoto Manifesto for Global Economics:
1148
+ The Platform of Community, Humanity, and Spirituality; Yamash’ta, S., Yagi, T., Hill, S., Eds.; Springer:
1149
+ Singapore, 2018; pp. 395–415. DOI:10.1007/978-981-10-6478-4_22.
1150
+ 37. Nagaoka, S. The Future of Capitalism and the Modern Islamic Economy, Japanese ed.; Shisousha: Tokyo, Japan,
1151
+ 2020.
1152
+ 38. Kato, H. Social Order in the Islamic World: Another “market and fairness, Japanese ed.; Shisousha: Tokyo, Japan,
1153
+ 2020.
1154
+ 39. Kamdzhalov, M. Islamic finance and the new technology challenges. Eur. J. Islamic Fin. 2020, 1–6.
1155
+ DOI:10.13135/2421-2172/3813.
1156
+ 40. Arfah, A.; Olilingo, F.Z.; Syaifuddin, S.; Dahliah, D.; Nurmiati, N.; Putra, A.H.P.K. Economics during
1157
+ global recession: Sharia-economics as a post COVID-19 agenda. J. Asian Fin. Econ. Bus. 2020, 7, 1077–1085.
1158
+ DOI:10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.1077.
1159
+ 41. Yukti, R.H.; Supriadi, S.; Ariyadi, A. The Role of the Islamic Economic System in Tackling Global Economic
1160
+ Recession in the COVID-19 Era; Semarang: Indonesia, 2020. DOI:10.4108/eai.27-8-2020.2303187.
1161
+ 42. Grubacic, A.; Graeber, D. Anarchism, or the Revolutionary Movement of the Twenty-First Century; 2004.
1162
+ Available online: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/andrej-grubacic-david-graeber-anarchism-or-the-
1163
+ revolutionary-movement-of-the-twenty-first-centu (accessed on 17 November 2022).
1164
+ 43. Yamada, H. Possible Anarchism: Marcel Mauss and the Moral of Gift, Japanese ed.; Inscript; Tokyo, 2020.
1165
+ 44. Deguchi, Y. After corona seen from “Self-as-We.” In Beyond Smart Life, Japanese ed.; Hitachi Kyoto
1166
+ University Laboratory, Ed.; Nikkei Business Publications: Tokyo, Japan, 2020.
1167
+ 45. Deguchi, Y. Philosophy – What Is Self: “Self-as-We” and After Corona, Japanese ed. Available online:
1168
+ https://ukihss.cpier.kyoto-u.ac.jp/1783/ (accessed on 17 November 2022).
1169
+ 46. Deguchi, Y. Philosophy – From "Capability" to "Incapability": After Corona's View of Humanity, Japanese ed.
1170
+ Available online: https://ukihss.cpier.kyoto-u.ac.jp/2429/ (accessed on 17 November 2022).
1171
+ 47. Pestoff, V.A. Third sector and co-operative services — An alternative to privatization. J. Consum. Policy.
1172
+ 1992, 15, 21–45. DOI:10.1007/BF01016352.
1173
+
1174
+
1175
+ 17 of 17
1176
+
1177
+
1178
+ 48. Hiroi, Y. Rethinking on Community: Connection, Cities and Future of Japanese Society, Japanese ed.;
1179
+ Chikumashobo: Tokyo, Japan, 2009.
1180
+ 49. Hiroi, Y. The Design of Population-Declining Society, Japanese ed.; Toyo Keizai: Tokyo, Japan, 2019.
1181
+ 50. Rajan, R. The Third Pillar: How Markets and the State Leave the Community Behind; Penguin Press: New York,
1182
+ USA, 2019.
1183
+ 51. Karatani, K. Power and Modes of Exchange, Japanese ed.; Iwanami Shoten: Tokyo, Japan, 2020.
1184
+ 52. Sheidel, W. The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality From the Stone Age to the Twenty-First
1185
+ Century; Princeton University Press: Princeton, USA, 2017.
1186
+ 53. Aktaev, N.E.; Bannova, K.A. Mathematical modeling of probability distribution of money by means of
1187
+ potential formation. Physica A. 2022, 595, 127089. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127089.
1188
+ 54. Kemp, J.T.; Bettencourt, L.M. Statistical dynamics of wealth inequality in stochastic models of growth.
1189
+ Physica A. 2022, 607, 128180. DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2022.128180.
1190
+ 55. Nihon Nogyo Shinbun, Ed. The Origins and Future of Cooperatives: Inheriting the Spirit of Mutual Aid, Japanese
1191
+ ed.; Iwanami Shoten: Tokyo, Japan, 2017.
1192
+ 56. Fujii, A; Harada, K; Otaka, K. Social Enterprise Tackling Social Exclusion, Japanese ed.; Keisoshobo: Tokyo,
1193
+ Japan, 2013.
1194
+ 57. Yunus, M. Building Social Business: The New Kind of Capitalism that Serves Humanity’s Most Pressing Needs;
1195
+ Public Affairs: New York, USA, 2010.
1196
+ 58. Mizuguchi, T. ESG Investment: The Shape of New Capitalism, Japanese ed.; Nikkei Business Publications:
1197
+ Tokyo, Japan, 2017.
1198
+ 59. Epstein, M.J.; Buhovac, A.R. Making Sustainability Work: Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate
1199
+ Social, Environmental, and Economic Impacts, 2nd ed.; Berrett-Koehler Publishers: San Francisco, USA, 2014.
1200
+ 60. Takahashi, M; Kimura, T.; Ishiguro, T. Theorizing Social Innovation: To Discover New Practice of Social
1201
+ Entrepreneurship, Japanese ed.; Bunshundo: Tokyo, Japan, 2018.
1202
+ 61. Newsom, G. Citizenville: How to Take the Town Square Digital and Reinvent Government; Penguin Books:
1203
+ London, UK, 2013.
1204
+ 62. Schneider, N. Everything for Everyone: The Radical Tradition That Is Shaping the Next Economy; Bold Type
1205
+ Books: New York, USA, 2018.
1206
+ 63. Kato, T.; Kudo, Y.; Miyakoshi, J.; Owa, M.; Asa, Y.; Numata, T.; Mine, R.; Mizuno, H.; Social Co-OS: Cyber-
1207
+ human social co-operating system. IET Cyber Phys. Syst. Theor. Appl. 2022, 1–14. DOI:10.1049/cps2.12037.
1208
+
FtAyT4oBgHgl3EQfSvdV/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/tmp_files/2301.03809v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,617 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Strain Induced Enhanced Photocatalytic Activities
2
+ in Layered Two Dimensional C2N/MoS2
3
+ Heterostructure: A Meta-GGA Study
4
+ Soumendra Kumar Das1, Lokanath Patra2, Prasanjit Samal1,
5
+ Pratap K Sahoo1
6
+ 1School of Physical Sciences, National Institute of Science Education and Research
7
+ (NISER) Bhubaneswar, HBNI, Jatni, Khurda-752050, Odisha, India.
8
+ 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California Santa Barbara, CA,
9
+ 93106, USA.
10
11
+ Abstract.
12
+ The improved photocatalytic water splitting using 2D materials has
13
+ technological importance for economically viable renewable energy. The present study
14
+ focuses on the effect of uniaxial, biaxial, and vertical strain on the energy gap and band
15
+ edge positions of C2N/MoS2 van der Waals heterostructures through first-principles
16
+ density functional theory using PBE and SCAN functionals. The calculations establish
17
+ that SCAN functional provides comparatively much better results as compared to the
18
+ PBE for the band gap and band alignment study. The heterostructure exhibits a type-
19
+ II band alignment which is beneficial for the efficient separation of charge carriers. For a
20
+ good photocatalyst, the band edge positions should straddle the water redox potentials.
21
+ It is observed that for both compressive and tensile vertical strain, the water redox
22
+ potential values lie within the valence band maximum (VBM) and conduction band
23
+ minimum (CBM) of the heterostructure. On the other hand, for uniaxial and biaxial
24
+ strain, the system can be used as a useful photocatalyst only for larger compressive
25
+ strain, whereas for tensile strain, the energy gap between VBM and CBM keeps on
26
+ decreasing and lie within the water oxidation/reduction potential.
27
+ Our study also
28
+ establishes that the meta-GGA SCAN functional shows similar results as compared
29
+ to the computationally expensive hybrid HSE functionals. The present work can be
30
+ extremely useful for experimentalists to design artificial heterostructure devices for
31
+ better performance in photocatalytic water splitting.
32
+ Keywords: Photocatalytic water splitting, DFT, Van der Waals heterostructures, strain,
33
+ Type-II Band alignment.
34
+ Submitted to: 2D Mater.
35
+ arXiv:2301.03809v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 10 Jan 2023
36
+
37
+ 2
38
+ 1. Introduction
39
+ The emergence of photocatalytic water splitting has been a successful technology to
40
+ meet the demand for the energy crisis and environmental pollution created by our fast-
41
+ growing economy. The development of high-performance photo-catalytic materials to
42
+ create hydrogen by using solar energy has been a serious focus of research for many
43
+ years [1, 2]. The key factor for achieving highly efficient photocatalysts (PCs) is that
44
+ the band gap should be larger than the water redox potentials. More specifically, the
45
+ conduction band minimum (CBM) of the PCs should be above the H+/H2 potential and
46
+ the valence band maximum (VBM) should be below H2O/O2 potential simultaneously,
47
+ thus requiring a minimum band gap of 1.23 eV [3]. In addition, literature reports have
48
+ established the importance of co-catalysts for boosting the electron-hole separation
49
+ and improving the reaction kinetics [4]. Under such circumstances, two-dimensional
50
+ materials like graphene, hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) mono layers, transition metal
51
+ dichalcogenides (TMDCs), C3N4, C2N, etc, have created a lot of interest, in meeting
52
+ the demand, because of their novel electronic, thermal and optoelectronic properties.
53
+ In particular, MoS2 has a direct band gap (2 eV), and high carrier mobility in the
54
+ form of a single monolayer, which makes it an important candidate for photocatalytic
55
+ and photovoltaic applications [5, 6].
56
+ Similarly, the porous C2N monolayer is found
57
+ to be a direct band gap semiconductor with a gap of 1.96 eV [7]. Zhao et al. have
58
+ adopted a 2D/2D polymeric Z-scheme heterostructure by using a pair of ultrathin
59
+ g-C3N4 nanosheets in order to provide H2- and O2- evolving photocatalysts through
60
+ the strategy of electrostatic self-assembly. Using Pt and Co(OH)2 as co-catalysts, the
61
+ heterostructure achieved a solar-to-hydrogen efficiency of 1.16 % which originates due to
62
+ the formation of direct Z-scheme charge transfer pathway through the interface between
63
+ H2- and O2- evolving components [8]. It has been suggested that the use of C2N and
64
+ MoS2 can be highly efficient for photocatalytic study and also can be complementary
65
+ to the use of graphene and h-BN [9].
66
+ Despite the extensive use of C2N and MoS2, there are some challenges as well for the
67
+ application of these materials for photocatalytic study. The charge distribution of the
68
+ valence band maximum (VBM) and conduction band minimum (CBM) states for these
69
+ systems are not well separated in space resulting in reduced light absorbing efficiency
70
+ because of the recombination of the photoinduced electrons and holes [7, 10]. Therefore,
71
+ attempts have been made to use van der Waals heterostructures to fix the issues. The
72
+ electronic properties of C2N/InSe heterostructure are found to be greatly affected by
73
+ vertical strain and electric field. Without any electric field, the heterostructure possesses
74
+ a type-II band alignment with an indirect band gap of 1.34 eV at an equilibrium
75
+ interlayer distance of 3.325 ˚A. Application of an electric field or a change in interlayer
76
+ distance results in a transition from type-II to type-I band alignment and indirect to
77
+ direct band gap in this heterostructure [11].
78
+ Band gap and band offset engineering at C2N/MSe2 (M = Mo, W) interface have
79
+ established that the heterostructure possesses a narrow indirect band gap with type-II
80
+
81
+ 3
82
+ band alignment which is favourable for the photogenerated electron-hole pairs. The
83
+ application of vertical strain and electric field strongly modulate the magnitude of
84
+ band gap values and band offsets, but the type-II band alignment nature remains
85
+ preserved [12].
86
+ Strain engineering plays a significant role in tuning the electronic
87
+ properties and photocatalytic performance of 2D heterostructures. Wang et al. have
88
+ studied the effect of strain on the electronic structure of C2N/MTe (M= Ga, In)
89
+ through DFT calculations which exhibit excellent optical properties with good structural
90
+ stability. It was observed that for C2N/GaTe heterostructure, the exciton-Bohr radius
91
+ remains unaffected by the application of strain. On the other hand, compressive strain
92
+ reduces the exciton-Bohr radius in C2N/InTe system. The power conversion efficiency
93
+ shows an increase up to 22.1% for C2N/GaTe with 4% strain and 19.8% for C2N/GaTe
94
+ heterostructure with 6% strain [13]. Han et al. reported that the catalytic efficiency
95
+ of C2N/SiH heterojunction can be effectively adjusted by the application of -2% and
96
+ +4% biaxial strain for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution
97
+ reaction (OER), respectively [14]. The Cs3Bi2I9/C2N heterostructure exhibits a charge
98
+ distribution across the whole structure due to the difference in the work function between
99
+ the two monolayers and a charge transfer at the interface due to the formation of an
100
+ internal electric field [15]. The photocatalytic study in MoS2/ZnO heterostructure shows
101
+ an indirect band gap with type-II band alignment, a significant built-in potential of
102
+ 7.42 eV, and a valence band offset of 1.23 eV across the interface. The photogenerated
103
+ carriers are localized in different layers and can effectively generate hydrogen energy.
104
+ In contrast, the MoSe2/ZnO heterostructure possesses a type-I band alignment with a
105
+ direct band gap of 1.80 eV, built-in potential around 3.64 eV, and a valence band offset
106
+ of 0.34 eV [16].
107
+ Despite the extensive studies on C2N based van der Waals heterostructures,
108
+ significant progress has not been achieved both theoretically and experimentally. As a
109
+ typical case, reports on the C2N/MoS2 heterostructures are very scarce and a systematic
110
+ investigation of the physical properties of this system is still lacking. In this article,
111
+ we report the effect of vertical, uniaxial, and biaxial strain on the photocatalytic
112
+ water splitting performance of C2N/MoS2 van der Waals heterostructures through first-
113
+ principles electronic structure calculations.
114
+ 2. Results and Discussion
115
+ The schematic of the crystal structure of C2N monolayer, MoS2 layer, and C2N/MoS2
116
+ heterostructure is illustrated in Fig.
117
+ 1.
118
+ In C2N monolayer, twelve C-N bonds are
119
+ alternately connected to the six C-C bonds in such a way that the periodic holes are
120
+ present without any atom in the middle of the lattice. The in-plane bond length is
121
+ estimated to be around 1.43 and 1.47 ˚A for the C-C bond and 1.34 ˚A for the C-N bond,
122
+ respectively which is also close to the previously reported values [17]. The optimized
123
+ lattice constant using PBE functional is estimated to be 8.33 ˚A and 3.19 ˚A for the C2N
124
+ and MoS2 monolayer, respectively which is in reasonable agreement with the reported
125
+
126
+ 4
127
+ experimental and theoretical results [18, 19].
128
+ The heterostructure is constructed by
129
+ making a supercell of (3×3×1) for C2N and (8×8×1) for MoS2 layer, respectively. The
130
+ corresponding lattice mismatch between the two monolayers is around 1.9% which is
131
+ within the acceptable range.
132
+ The heterostructure after ionic relaxation results in a
133
+ corrugated structure (Fig. 1d), very similar to silicene. The initial van der Waals gap
134
+ (3.5 ˚A) between the layers reduces to 3.373 ˚A with an optimized lattice constant of
135
+ 25.47 ˚A (Fig. 1c, d).
136
+ Figure 1. Schematic representation of the top view of isolated (a) C2N monolayer,
137
+ (b) MoS2 monolayer, (c) side view and (d) top view of C2N/MoS2 heterostructure.
138
+ The schematic symbols of the C, N, Mo, and S atoms are indicated as blue, red, green,
139
+ and brown colors, respectively.
140
+ The calculated electronic structure of free-standing C2N monolayer, MoS2 using
141
+ the PBE functional are given in Fig. 2a,b. The band dispersion for both the material
142
+ indicates the presence of valence band maximum (VBM) and conduction band minimum
143
+ (CBM) at the same k value in the Brillouin zone. In addition, for both structures, the
144
+ VBM remains close to the Fermi level as compared to the CBM. This confirms that
145
+ both C2N and MoS2 monolayers are p-type direct band gap semiconductors and the
146
+ calculated energy gap values are estimated to be 1.735 eV and 1.645 eV, respectively.
147
+ It is interesting to note that the energy band dispersion in C2N monolayer is relatively
148
+ flat where as MoS2 shows highly dispersive bands both in VB and CB regions. Hence,
149
+ it is expected that the MoS2 system will have a relatively low electron and hole effective
150
+ mass along the high symmetry path (Γ-M-K-Γ) as compared to that of C2N monolayer.
151
+ Therefore, the electron and hole mobilities of MoS2 would be larger than that of
152
+ the C2N monolayer, since the effective mass is inversely proportional to the carrier
153
+
154
+ 5
155
+ mobility. Figure 2e illustrates the electronic structure of C2N/MoS2 heterostructure
156
+ which preserves the direct band gap behaviour of the isolated monolayers. The VBM
157
+ is situated close to the Fermi level suggesting that the charge carriers are of p-type.
158
+ However, the value of the energy gap is comparatively reduced and becomes 1.353 eV.
159
+ We note that the ideal band gap for a semiconductor to use more visible light is around
160
+ 1.5 eV [20].
161
+ Figure 2. Electronic band structure of (a) C2N, (b) MoS2 monolayer, (c) C2N/MoS2
162
+ heterostructure, (d-f) The total and projected density of states for the corresponding
163
+ system calculated using PBE functional. The dashed line in each figure indicates the
164
+ Fermi level.
165
+ It is well known that the PBE functional severely underestimates the energy gap
166
+ of the system. Again calculations involving the hybrid density functional like HSE-06,
167
+ B3LYP, etc are highly computationally expensive which is beyond the computational
168
+ resources available to us. Therefore we have further investigated the systems with SCAN
169
+ meta-GGA functional. The obtained results are consistent with the experiment as well
170
+ as previously reported simulated results. The contribution of different orbitals at the
171
+ band edges is evident from the total and orbital projected density of states analysis as
172
+ given in Fig. 2b-f. From Fig. 2b, it is clear that the valence band of C2N is dominated
173
+ by the C ‘2p’ states with a significant contribution from N ‘2p’ states as well. The CBM
174
+ minimum is also populated by the hybridization of the ‘p’ states of C and N atoms.
175
+ The partial DOS analysis of MoS2 establishes that the VBM is highly dominated by Mo
176
+ ‘4d’ states with a relatively less population than S ‘3p’ states. On the other hand, the
177
+ CBM is mainly populated by Mo ‘4d’ states. The projected DOS for the heterostructure
178
+
179
+ 3
180
+ (a)
181
+ 3
182
+ 1
183
+ (eV)
184
+ (e)
185
+ (c)
186
+ F
187
+ 0
188
+ 0
189
+ 3-3
190
+ 0
191
+ 3
192
+ 3
193
+ M
194
+ r
195
+ K
196
+ M
197
+ r
198
+ M
199
+ K
200
+ M
201
+ r
202
+ K
203
+ M
204
+ (b)
205
+ total dos
206
+ 16
207
+ ((d):
208
+ total dos .
209
+ DOS (StatesleV)
210
+ C_2P
211
+ Mo_4d
212
+ S_3p
213
+ N_2P
214
+ (f)
215
+ 8
216
+ 90
217
+ 0
218
+ 0
219
+ 0
220
+ 2
221
+ 0
222
+ 2
223
+ -2
224
+ 0
225
+ 2
226
+ -2
227
+ 0
228
+ 2
229
+ E-E. (eV)
230
+ E-E. (eV)
231
+ E-E. (eV)6
232
+ indicates that the VBM is populated by the states from MoS2 and the CBM is dominated
233
+ by the C2N.
234
+ It has been established that strain plays a significant role in efficiently tuning the
235
+ electronic, optical, and photocatalytic properties of van der Waals heterojunctions. In
236
+ this section, we studied the effect of vertical strain by changing the interlayer distance
237
+ between the C2N and MoS2 monolayers.
238
+ However, we would like to mention that
239
+ experimentally, the interlayer distance can be effectively varied by changing pressure
240
+ with a scanning tunneling microscopy tip [21], through vacuum thermal annealing [22],
241
+ inserting a dielectric BN layer inside the van der Waals gap of the heterostructure [23],
242
+ using diamond anvil cells [24].
243
+ The vertical strain (∆D) can be defined as ∆D =
244
+ d−d0
245
+ d0
246
+ × 100, where d0 and d are the interlayer separation between C2N and MoS2 under
247
+ equilibrium and strained configurations, respectively. The effect of vertical strain on
248
+ the band gap of the heterostructure is given in Fig. 3a. It is observed that with an
249
+ increase in tensile strain along the ‘z’ direction, the band gap value shows an increasing
250
+ trend and exhibits a linear variation. Instead, when the compressive strain between
251
+ the layer is increased, the band gap decreases and follows a linear relationship with the
252
+ direction of applied strain. The band evolution is further analysed through the strain-
253
+ dependent projected density of states (PDOS) as shown in supporting information S1.
254
+ It is clear that the compressive strain increases the population of Mo ‘4d’ states for the
255
+ VBM near the Fermi level. The CBM is mainly composed of a mixture of ‘p’ states
256
+ of C2N and MoS2. With an increase in tensile strain both Mo ‘4d’ and C2N, MoS2 ‘p’
257
+ states move away from the Fermi level resulting in a larger band gap. The band gap
258
+ calculation is further analysed using the meta-GGA SCAN functional which indicates
259
+ an enhanced band gap value as compared to the PBE result for the entire range of
260
+ compressive and tensile strains considered. The band gap variation for the compressive
261
+ strain shows a nearly linear behaviour consistent with the PBE result. Similarly, for the
262
+ tensile configuration, the energy gap exhibits an increase in value up to 3% strain and
263
+ then remains constant with further expansion in interlayer separation.
264
+ Figure 3.
265
+ Band gap tuning of C2N/MoS2 heterostructure under (a) vertical, (b)
266
+ uniaxial, and (c) biaxial strain using PBE and SCAN functional
267
+
268
+ 1.5
269
+ 1.5
270
+ (a)
271
+ (eV)
272
+ (q)
273
+ -O-PBE
274
+ 1.2
275
+ 1.2
276
+ .2
277
+ O-SCAN
278
+ Vertical strain
279
+ (c)
280
+ 0.9
281
+ 0.9
282
+ 1.0
283
+ 0.6
284
+ Uniaxial strain
285
+ 0.6
286
+ Biaxialstrain
287
+ -5
288
+ 0
289
+ 5
290
+ -5
291
+ 0
292
+ 5
293
+ -5
294
+ 0
295
+ 5
296
+ Strain (%)
297
+ Strain (%)
298
+ Strain (%)7
299
+ The present heterostructure is also investigated with the application of uniaxial
300
+ and biaxial strain in order to study the influence of in-plane orbital overlapping. The
301
+ PBE result for the band gap evolution as a function of uniaxial strain is represented
302
+ in Fig. 3b. It is interesting to note that the band gap remains nearly linear for larger
303
+ compressive strain. As the compressive strain decreases from -5% to -1% the band gap
304
+ shows a mild increase in value.
305
+ The application of tensile strain along the uniaxial
306
+ direction shows a different trend as compared to the compressive one. The band gap
307
+ shows a systematic decrease in value with the increase in tensile strain from 0 to +5%.
308
+ The reduction in band gap may be due to the decrease in orbital overlapping between
309
+ the ‘p’ states of C and N and the ‘4d’ states of Mo. The corresponding partial density of
310
+ state (See supporting information Figure S2a, b) suggests that tensile strain increases
311
+ the DOS near the Fermi level for Mo ‘4d’ and C, N ‘p’ states. Similarly, the band
312
+ gap study was also executed by applying biaxial strain from -5% to +5% range. The
313
+ system shows a completely different behaviour as compared to the result for vertical
314
+ strain. The linear variation of the band gap for the compressive strain region remains
315
+ preserved as similar to the case of uniaxial strain with a linear variation with a slowly
316
+ decreasing trend. However, if we apply tensile strain then the band gap decreases much
317
+ more rapidly. The corresponding PDOS analysis indicates that for -5% compressive
318
+ strain, the VBM is mainly composed of C and N ‘2p’ states, and CBM is populated
319
+ by ‘p’ states of N atoms. When the strain increases from -5% to +5%, Mo ‘4d’ states
320
+ become the highest occupied band near the Fermi level. The CBM comes closer to the
321
+ Fermi level and resulting in the reduced band gap. The band gap calculation is further
322
+ analysed using SCAN functional for the uniaxial and biaxial strain configuration which
323
+ provides an enhanced band gap value as compared to the PBE functional. However, the
324
+ trend in variation of the band gap remains almost the same (Fig. 3b, c).
325
+ The essential requirement for any material for efficient photocatalytic water
326
+ splitting application is to identify appropriate band edge positions relative to the
327
+ hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) potentials of
328
+ the water. The CBM of the material should lie above the reduction reaction potential
329
+ and the VBM should lie below the oxidation reaction potential of water. To estimate
330
+ the band edge positions relative to the oxidation and reduction potential, the absolute
331
+ energy position of the CBM and VBM are calculated with respect to the vacuum level.
332
+ The vacuum level for the material is obtained by calculating the local potential and
333
+ then taking the average of the constant potential region. In the present study, we have
334
+ investigated the photocatalytic activity of the C2N/MoS2 heterostructure by applying
335
+ strain in the uniaxial, biaxial, and vertical directions.
336
+ We note that the reduction
337
+ potential (EH+/H2) and oxidation potential (EO2/H2O) of water with respect to vacuum
338
+ level are -4.44 and -5.67 eV, respectively [25]. The band alignment is then calculated
339
+ by plotting the appropriate band edge position with respect to the vacuum level as a
340
+ function of strain.
341
+ The calculated band edge position of the CBM and VBM under the influence of
342
+ vertical strain, using PBE functional is presented in Fig. 4a. It was observed that
343
+
344
+ 8
345
+ Figure 4. Band edge position of C2N/MoS2 heterostructure as a function of vertical
346
+ strain with respect to vacuum potential using (a) PBE and (b) SCAN functional. The
347
+ horizontal solid lines represent the water redox potentials
348
+ without applying any strain, the heterostructure exhibits band edge positions within
349
+ the water redox potentials of the water.
350
+ This result indicates that the sample is
351
+ not useful to carry out photocatalytic water splitting.
352
+ The sample is subjected to
353
+ compressive (tensile) vertical strain by reducing (increasing) the interlayer separation
354
+ between the C2N and MoS2 monolayers, respectively. It was observed that by applying
355
+ compressive strain, the band edge positions got improved as compared to the zero
356
+ strain case. However, both the CBM and VBM lie within the water redox potential
357
+ values. Applying tensile strain, the VBM and CBM move closer to the water redox
358
+ potential values but still lie below them. Therefore the PBE result indicates that the
359
+ application of -5 to +5% vertical strain does not enhance the band edge positions to be
360
+ useful for photocatalytic water splitting. However, we would like to mention that PBE
361
+ functional severely underestimates the band gap and band edge positions. Therefore
362
+ the calculations are further executed using meta-GGA SCAN functional (Fig. 4b). The
363
+ result indicates a significant improvement as compared to that of the PBE functional.
364
+ It was observed that, without applying any strain, the VBM comes below the oxidation
365
+ reaction potential, whereas the CBM moves up but still lies below the reduction potential
366
+
367
+ -4.2
368
+ (a)
369
+ -4.44 eV
370
+ -4.9
371
+ VBM
372
+ PBEResult
373
+ CBM
374
+ Energy (eV)
375
+ -5.6
376
+ -5.67 eV
377
+ -4.2
378
+ (b)
379
+ -4.44 eV
380
+ -4.9
381
+ SCAN Result
382
+ -5.6
383
+ -5.67 eV
384
+ -5
385
+ 0
386
+ 5
387
+ Strain (%)9
388
+ value. The application of compressive strain up to -2% positions the VBM well below
389
+ the oxidation potential of water but the CBM still lies below the reduction potential. On
390
+ further increase in the compressive strain from -3 to -5%, both the CBM and VBM lie
391
+ outside the range of water redox potentials hence enhancing the photocatalytic activities
392
+ of the sample. When the heterostructure is subjected to vertical tensile strain from
393
+ +1% to +5%, both the CBM and VBM straddle the water redox potential range hence
394
+ enhancing the photocatalytic response under visible light. There fore we conclude that
395
+ the present heterostructure exhibits efficient charge separation for photocatalytic water
396
+ splitting under tensile strain and larger compressive strain.
397
+ The sample is further subjected to uniaxial and biaxial strain to analyse the
398
+ photocatalytic performance. The uniaxial strain is applied by increasing or compressing
399
+ the in-plane lattice constant along the X- direction keeping the Y value fixed. Similarly,
400
+ the biaxial strain is applied by increasing or decreasing the X-Y lattice constant values
401
+ simultaneously. It is to be noted that the interlayer separation is kept at its equilibrium
402
+ value i.e 3.373 ˚A. The detailed graphical representation of band alignment under uniaxial
403
+ strain is given in the Supporting information S3 a.
404
+ It was observed that for PBE
405
+ functionals the CBM and VBM both lie within the redox potential range for the entire
406
+ range of uniaxial strain from -5 to +5%, thus indicating that uniaxial strain does not
407
+ produce a significant improvement to be useful for photocatalytic water splitting.
408
+ To get a better result, the strain calculation is repeated for the heterostructure
409
+ using SCAN functional and is given in Supporting information S3b. It was observed
410
+ that the application of larger uniaxial strain (-3 to -5%) puts the CBM and VBM outside
411
+ the water redox potential range. But the tensile strain reduces the band edge separation
412
+ even below the unstrained case. The VBM lies below the oxidation potential value but
413
+ the CBM finds its position below the reduction potential. Therefore we found that the
414
+ sample can be useful for photocatalytic water splitting for larger compressive uniaxial
415
+ strain whereas the tensile strain does not produce an enhancement in the photocatalytic
416
+ response.
417
+ The present C2N/MoS2 heterostructure is also investigated under biaxial
418
+ strain using both PBE and SCAN functionals (See Supporting information S4). The
419
+ results are quite similar to that of the uniaxial strain.
420
+ Like previous results, PBE
421
+ functional does not produce a better result for the photocatalytic activity. A larger
422
+ compressive strain puts the CBM above the reduction potential but the VBM lies above
423
+ the oxidation potential of water, thus not providing a useful result for our purpose.
424
+ Using SCAN functional, it was observed that from -2 to -5% compressive strain both
425
+ the CBM and VBM straddle outside the water redox potential. On the other hand,
426
+ tensile strain decreases the band edges position and put the CBM below the reduction
427
+ potential of water. Therefore, the heterostructure can be used for photocatalytic studies
428
+ for larger uniaxial and biaxial compressive strains.
429
+ In order to illustrate the charge transfer process between the C2N and MoS2
430
+ monolayers during the formation of the heterostructure, the charge density difference
431
+ is executed using PBE functional.
432
+ The charge density difference is calculated
433
+ by subtracting the charge density of the individual C2N and MoS2 monolayers
434
+
435
+ 10
436
+ Figure 5. Charge density difference of C2N/MoS2 heterostructure as a function of
437
+ vertical (a) -5% compressive (b) 0% (c) +5% tensile strain
438
+ from the C2N/MoS2 heterostructure.The charge density difference for the unstrained
439
+ heterostructure is illustrated in Fig. 5b. In all our charge density figures, the cyan color
440
+ indicates the charge depletion and the yellow color represents the charge accumulation
441
+ process. From Fig. 5b, we observe that the charge accumulation mainly occurs in the
442
+ interface region and partially in MoS2 monolayers, whereas most of the charge depletion
443
+ occurs in the top C2N and bottom MoS2. The change in charge density under vertical
444
+ strain is given in Fig. 5.
445
+ From the Fig.5a, we observe that with an increase in compressive vertical strain by
446
+ 5%, there is an equal proportion of charge accumulation and depletion close to the MoS2
447
+ layer whereas the charge depletion mainly occurs in the region close to C2N layer. The
448
+ charge density given in cyan color near the C atom in the C2N monolayer indicates a
449
+ charge depletion. Similarly, the charge density given in yellow color near the S atom in
450
+ the MoS2 layer indicates a charge accumulation. Hence this observation indicates that
451
+ there is a charge transfer from the S atom of MoS2 to the C atom of C2N monolayer. The
452
+ intensification of the charge transfer process under large compressive strain indicates an
453
+ enhanced interaction between the two monolayers. The strain-induced charge transfer
454
+ in C2N based heterostructures is consistent with other literature reports [26, 27, 28].
455
+ When the interlayer separation in increases to achieve a strain around +5%, the charge
456
+ depletion from the C2N layer almost disappears and most of the charge accumulation
457
+ occurs in the interface region close to MoS2. In other words, there is no appreciable
458
+ charge redistribution close to the MoS2 layer. This may be the influence of the van
459
+ der Waals gap between the two monolayers which varies as the structure moves from a
460
+ compressive strain state to a tensile strain state.
461
+ The effect of uniaxial compressive and tensile strain on the charge transfer process
462
+ is illustrated in supplementary information Fig.
463
+ S5.
464
+ It indicates that there is no
465
+ appreciable change in the charge density difference under uniaxial compressive and
466
+ tensile strain (up to 5%). On the other hand application of biaxial strain indicates a
467
+ significant influence on the charge density under compressive and tensile strains. From
468
+
469
+ (a)
470
+ E.= -5%
471
+ (b)
472
+ E,= 0%
473
+ (c)
474
+ E.= +5%11
475
+ the Supplementary information Fig. S6, we observe that as the system is subjected to
476
+ -5% compressive strain the charge depletion occurs in the C atom of the top layer. With
477
+ system changes from large compression to large tensile strain state, the depletion near
478
+ the C atom increases indicating more charge transfer from the S atom of MoS2 to the
479
+ C atom of C2N layer. Therefore we observe that both vertical and biaxial strain affects
480
+ the charge transfer process significantly as compared to the uniaxial strain state.
481
+ 3. Conclusion
482
+ In
483
+ summary,
484
+ we
485
+ have
486
+ studied
487
+ the
488
+ photocatalytic
489
+ performance
490
+ of
491
+ C2N/MoS2
492
+ heterostructure as a function of uniaxial, biaxial, and vertical strain configuration
493
+ through first-principles DFT calculations.
494
+ The unstrained heterostructure possesses
495
+ a direct band gap of 1.35 eV, where the VBM is populated by Mo ‘d’ states and the
496
+ CBM is contributed by ‘C’ and ‘N’ ‘p’ states. The calculated position of CBM and
497
+ VBM of individual monolayers indicates that the heterostructure possesses a type-II
498
+ band alignment which is beneficial for charge separation across the two monolayers and
499
+ preventing their recombination process. The SCAN functional provides better results
500
+ for the band gap and band edge positions calculation as compared to that of the PBE
501
+ result. Using the C2N/MoS2 heterostructure as a prototype, we have also found that the
502
+ meta-GGA SCAN functional shows similar results as compared to the computationally
503
+ expensive hybrid HSE functionals. The estimated CBM and CBM position as a function
504
+ of vertical strain indicates that the water reduction and oxidation potential values lie
505
+ within the band gap region with respect to the vacuum level for larger compressive
506
+ and tensile strain. In contrast, the system exhibits good photocatalytic performance
507
+ only for larger compression for uniaxial and biaxial strain states whereas the tensile
508
+ strain reduces the separation between the VBM and CBM within the water redox
509
+ potential value. The charge density difference indicates a significant charge transfer
510
+ for vertical and biaxial configuration as compared to the uniaxial state. The present
511
+ study can help researchers to reduce the computational cost by considering the meta-
512
+ GGA functionals over HSE for electronic structure calculations of similar systems. Our
513
+ calculation will also be extremely useful for designing artificial strained heterostructure
514
+ for the experimental community for better device application for photocatalytic water
515
+ splitting.
516
+ 4. Computational Methods
517
+ The first principles electronic structure calculations were performed using density
518
+ functional theory (DFT) with projector augmented-wave method [29] as implemented
519
+ in the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP) [30]. The Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof
520
+ (PBE) [31] parametrization-based generalized gradient approximation (GGA) was
521
+ chosen for the exchange-correlation functional. To accurately describe the interaction
522
+ between the layered structures, we have included the van der Waals correction method
523
+
524
+ REFERENCES
525
+ 12
526
+ (DFT-D2) presented by Grimme [32].
527
+ Initially, the gap between C2N and MoS2
528
+ monolayers is kept at 3.5 ˚A which is further optimized before running the electronic
529
+ structure calculation. As a benchmark, the system is further studied using strongly
530
+ constrained and appropriately normed (SCAN) meta-GGA functionals to get more
531
+ accurate results as compared to the PBE functional and also to be consistent with the
532
+ reported experimental data. A vacuum layer of 20 ˚A was selected along the ‘Z’ direction
533
+ to avoid interaction between the adjacent layers. The plane wave expansion cut-off was
534
+ chosen to be 520 eV. The Brillouin zone integration was performed using a Γ-centered
535
+ (9×9×1) k-mesh for the structural relaxation and electronic structure calculation of the
536
+ isolated C2N and MoS2 monolayers. For the C2N/MoS2 heterostructure containing 354
537
+ atoms, the geometry optimization and electronic structure calculation are performed
538
+ using a Γ centered (2×2×1) k-point samplings.
539
+ All the structures are allowed for
540
+ relaxation to get the optimized atomic position until the total forces acting on each
541
+ atom are less than 0.02 eV/˚A.
542
+ Data availability statement
543
+ The additional data that support the findings of this article are available in the
544
+ Supplementary Information.
545
+ Acknowledgments
546
+ The authors would like to thank the National Institute of Science Education and
547
+ Research (NISER), Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India, for funding
548
+ the research work through project number RIN-4001. The authors acknowledge the
549
+ high-performance computing facility at NISER.
550
+ Data availability statement
551
+ The additional data that support the findings of this article are available in the
552
+ Supplementary Information.
553
+ Conflict of interest
554
+ The authors have no conflicts to disclose.
555
+ References
556
+ [1] Song X, Wei G, Sun J, Peng C, Yin J, Zhang X, Jiang Y and Fei H 2020 Nat.
557
+ Catal. 3 1027–1033
558
+ [2] Takata T, Jiang J, Sakata Y, Nakabayashi M, Shibata N, Nandal V, Seki K,
559
+ Hisatomi T and Domen K 2020 Nature 581 411–414
560
+
561
+ REFERENCES
562
+ 13
563
+ [3] Liao J, Sa B, Zhou J, Ahuja R and Sun Z 2014 J. Phys. Chem. C 118 17594–17599
564
+ [4] Zhang H, Zuo S, Qiu M, Wang S, Zhang Y, Zhang J and Lou X W 2020 Sci. adv.
565
+ 6 eabb9823
566
+ [5] Chhowalla M, Shin H S, Eda G, Li L J, Loh K P and Zhang H 2013 Nat. Chem. 5
567
+ 263–275
568
+ [6] Bonaccorso F, Colombo L, Yu G, Stoller M, Tozzini V, Ferrari A C, Ruoff R S and
569
+ Pellegrini V 2015 Science 347 1246501
570
+ [7] Mahmood J, Lee E K, Jung M, Shin D, Jeon I Y, Jung S M, Choi H J, Seo J M,
571
+ Bae S Y, Sohn S D et al. 2015 Nat. Comm. 6 1–7
572
+ [8] Zhao D, Wang Y, Dong C L, Huang Y C, Chen J, Xue F, Shen S and Guo L 2021
573
+ Nat. Energy 6 388–397
574
+ [9] Mahmood J, Jung S M, Kim S J, Park J, Yoo J W and Baek J B 2015 Chem.
575
+ Mater. 27 4860–4864
576
+ [10] Ataca C, Sahin H and Ciraci S 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 8983–8999
577
+ [11] Pham K D, Hieu N N, Bui L M, Phuc H V, Hoi B D, Tu L T, Bach L G, Ilyasov
578
+ V V, Amin B, Idrees M and Nguyen C V 2019 Chem. Phys. Lett. 716 155–161
579
+ [12] Slassi A 2022 RSC. Adv. 12 12068–12077
580
+ [13] Wang X, Wang Y, Quhe R, Tang Y, Dai X and Tang W 2020 J. Alloys Compd.
581
+ 816 152559
582
+ [14] Han S, Wei X, Huang Y, Zhang J and Yang J 2022 Appl. Surf. Sci. 579 152233
583
+ [15] Wang H, Ma J, Chen Z, Yuan Y, Zhou B and Li W 2022 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
584
+ 24 17348–17360
585
+ [16] Sharma N, Kapila A, Vivek V and Sharma H 2022 Mater. Today Sustain.
586
+ 20(100248)
587
+ [17] Kishore M A and Ravindran P 2017 ChemPhysChem 18 1526–1532
588
+ [18] Wang Q H, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kis A, Coleman J N and Strano M S 2012 Nat.
589
+ Nanotech. 7 699–712
590
+ [19] Mahmood J, Lee E K, Jung M, Shin D, Jeon I Y, Jung S M, Choi H J, Seo J M,
591
+ Bae S Y, Sohn S D, Park N, Oh J H, Shin H J and Baek J B 2015 Nat. Commun.
592
+ 6(6486)
593
+ [20] Chowdhury C, Karmakar S and Datta A 2017 J. Phys. Chem. C 121(14) 7615–7624
594
+ [21] Mudd G, Molas M, Chen X, Z´olyomi V, Nogajewski K, Kudrynskyi Z R, Kovalyuk
595
+ Z D, Yusa G, Makarovsky O, Eaves L et al. 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 1–10
596
+ [22] Tongay S, Fan W, Kang J, Park J, Koldemir U, Suh J, Narang D S, Liu K, Ji J,
597
+ Li J, Sinclair R and Wu J 2014 Nano Lett. 14 3185–3190
598
+ [23] Fang H, Battaglia C, Carraro C, Nemsak S, Ozdol B, Kang J S, Bechtel H A, Desai
599
+ S B, Kronast F, Unal A A, Conti G, Conlon C, Palsson G K, Martin M C, Minor
600
+ A M, Fadley C S, Yablonovitch E, Maboudian R and Javey A 2014 PNAS 111
601
+ 6198–6202
602
+
603
+ REFERENCES
604
+ 14
605
+ [24] Yankowitz M, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, San-Jose P and LeRoy B J 2016 Nat.
606
+ Commun. 7 1–8
607
+ [25] Weast R C et al. 1986 CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1983–1984
608
+ [26] Guan Z, Lian C S, Hu S, Ni S, Li J and Duan W 2017 J. Phys. Chem. C 121
609
+ 3654–3660
610
+ [27] Kishore M R A, Larsson K and Ravindran P 2020 ACS Omega 5 23762–23768
611
+ [28] Wang G, Chang J, Tang W, Xie W and Ang Y S 2022 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 55
612
+ 293002
613
+ [29] Bl¨ochl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 17953
614
+ [30] Kresse G and Furthm¨uller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169
615
+ [31] Perdew J P, Burke K and Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865
616
+ [32] Grimme S 2006 J. Comput. Chem. 27 1787–1799
617
+
INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,359 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ filepath=/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf,len=358
2
+ page_content='Strain Induced Enhanced Photocatalytic Activities in Layered Two Dimensional C2N/MoS2 Heterostructure: A Meta-GGA Study Soumendra Kumar Das1, Lokanath Patra2, Prasanjit Samal1, Pratap K Sahoo1 1School of Physical Sciences, National Institute of Science Education and Research (NISER) Bhubaneswar, HBNI, Jatni, Khurda-752050, Odisha, India.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
3
+ page_content=' 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
4
+ page_content=' E-mail: psamal@niser.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
5
+ page_content='ac.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
6
+ page_content='in, pratap.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
7
+ page_content='sahoo@niser.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
8
+ page_content='ac.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
9
+ page_content='in Abstract.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
10
+ page_content=' The improved photocatalytic water splitting using 2D materials has technological importance for economically viable renewable energy.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
11
+ page_content=' The present study focuses on the effect of uniaxial, biaxial, and vertical strain on the energy gap and band edge positions of C2N/MoS2 van der Waals heterostructures through first-principles density functional theory using PBE and SCAN functionals.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
12
+ page_content=' The calculations establish that SCAN functional provides comparatively much better results as compared to the PBE for the band gap and band alignment study.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
13
+ page_content=' The heterostructure exhibits a type- II band alignment which is beneficial for the efficient separation of charge carriers.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
14
+ page_content=' For a good photocatalyst, the band edge positions should straddle the water redox potentials.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
15
+ page_content=' It is observed that for both compressive and tensile vertical strain, the water redox potential values lie within the valence band maximum (VBM) and conduction band minimum (CBM) of the heterostructure.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
16
+ page_content=' On the other hand, for uniaxial and biaxial strain, the system can be used as a useful photocatalyst only for larger compressive strain, whereas for tensile strain, the energy gap between VBM and CBM keeps on decreasing and lie within the water oxidation/reduction potential.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
17
+ page_content=' Our study also establishes that the meta-GGA SCAN functional shows similar results as compared to the computationally expensive hybrid HSE functionals.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
18
+ page_content=' The present work can be extremely useful for experimentalists to design artificial heterostructure devices for better performance in photocatalytic water splitting.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
19
+ page_content=' Keywords: Photocatalytic water splitting, DFT, Van der Waals heterostructures, strain, Type-II Band alignment.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
20
+ page_content=' Submitted to: 2D Mater.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
21
+ page_content=' arXiv:2301.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
22
+ page_content='03809v1 [cond-mat.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
23
+ page_content='mtrl-sci] 10 Jan 2023 2 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
24
+ page_content=' Introduction The emergence of photocatalytic water splitting has been a successful technology to meet the demand for the energy crisis and environmental pollution created by our fast- growing economy.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
25
+ page_content=' The development of high-performance photo-catalytic materials to create hydrogen by using solar energy has been a serious focus of research for many years [1, 2].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
26
+ page_content=' The key factor for achieving highly efficient photocatalysts (PCs) is that the band gap should be larger than the water redox potentials.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
27
+ page_content=' More specifically, the conduction band minimum (CBM) of the PCs should be above the H+/H2 potential and the valence band maximum (VBM) should be below H2O/O2 potential simultaneously, thus requiring a minimum band gap of 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
28
+ page_content='23 eV [3].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
29
+ page_content=' In addition, literature reports have established the importance of co-catalysts for boosting the electron-hole separation and improving the reaction kinetics [4].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
30
+ page_content=' Under such circumstances, two-dimensional materials like graphene, hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) mono layers, transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs), C3N4, C2N, etc, have created a lot of interest, in meeting the demand, because of their novel electronic, thermal and optoelectronic properties.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
31
+ page_content=' In particular, MoS2 has a direct band gap (2 eV), and high carrier mobility in the form of a single monolayer, which makes it an important candidate for photocatalytic and photovoltaic applications [5, 6].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
32
+ page_content=' Similarly, the porous C2N monolayer is found to be a direct band gap semiconductor with a gap of 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
33
+ page_content='96 eV [7].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
34
+ page_content=' Zhao et al.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
35
+ page_content=' have adopted a 2D/2D polymeric Z-scheme heterostructure by using a pair of ultrathin g-C3N4 nanosheets in order to provide H2- and O2- evolving photocatalysts through the strategy of electrostatic self-assembly.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
36
+ page_content=' Using Pt and Co(OH)2 as co-catalysts, the heterostructure achieved a solar-to-hydrogen efficiency of 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
37
+ page_content='16 % which originates due to the formation of direct Z-scheme charge transfer pathway through the interface between H2- and O2- evolving components [8].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
38
+ page_content=' It has been suggested that the use of C2N and MoS2 can be highly efficient for photocatalytic study and also can be complementary to the use of graphene and h-BN [9].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
39
+ page_content=' Despite the extensive use of C2N and MoS2, there are some challenges as well for the application of these materials for photocatalytic study.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
40
+ page_content=' The charge distribution of the valence band maximum (VBM) and conduction band minimum (CBM) states for these systems are not well separated in space resulting in reduced light absorbing efficiency because of the recombination of the photoinduced electrons and holes [7, 10].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
41
+ page_content=' Therefore, attempts have been made to use van der Waals heterostructures to fix the issues.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
42
+ page_content=' The electronic properties of C2N/InSe heterostructure are found to be greatly affected by vertical strain and electric field.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
43
+ page_content=' Without any electric field, the heterostructure possesses a type-II band alignment with an indirect band gap of 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
44
+ page_content='34 eV at an equilibrium interlayer distance of 3.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
45
+ page_content='325 ˚A.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
46
+ page_content=' Application of an electric field or a change in interlayer distance results in a transition from type-II to type-I band alignment and indirect to direct band gap in this heterostructure [11].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
47
+ page_content=' Band gap and band offset engineering at C2N/MSe2 (M = Mo, W) interface have established that the heterostructure possesses a narrow indirect band gap with type-II 3 band alignment which is favourable for the photogenerated electron-hole pairs.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
48
+ page_content=' The application of vertical strain and electric field strongly modulate the magnitude of band gap values and band offsets, but the type-II band alignment nature remains preserved [12].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
49
+ page_content=' Strain engineering plays a significant role in tuning the electronic properties and photocatalytic performance of 2D heterostructures.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
50
+ page_content=' Wang et al.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
51
+ page_content=' have studied the effect of strain on the electronic structure of C2N/MTe (M= Ga, In) through DFT calculations which exhibit excellent optical properties with good structural stability.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
52
+ page_content=' It was observed that for C2N/GaTe heterostructure, the exciton-Bohr radius remains unaffected by the application of strain.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
53
+ page_content=' On the other hand, compressive strain reduces the exciton-Bohr radius in C2N/InTe system.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
54
+ page_content=' The power conversion efficiency shows an increase up to 22.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
55
+ page_content='1% for C2N/GaTe with 4% strain and 19.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
56
+ page_content='8% for C2N/GaTe heterostructure with 6% strain [13].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
57
+ page_content=' Han et al.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
58
+ page_content=' reported that the catalytic efficiency of C2N/SiH heterojunction can be effectively adjusted by the application of -2% and +4% biaxial strain for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER), respectively [14].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
59
+ page_content=' The Cs3Bi2I9/C2N heterostructure exhibits a charge distribution across the whole structure due to the difference in the work function between the two monolayers and a charge transfer at the interface due to the formation of an internal electric field [15].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
60
+ page_content=' The photocatalytic study in MoS2/ZnO heterostructure shows an indirect band gap with type-II band alignment, a significant built-in potential of 7.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
61
+ page_content='42 eV, and a valence band offset of 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
62
+ page_content='23 eV across the interface.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
63
+ page_content=' The photogenerated carriers are localized in different layers and can effectively generate hydrogen energy.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
64
+ page_content=' In contrast, the MoSe2/ZnO heterostructure possesses a type-I band alignment with a direct band gap of 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
65
+ page_content='80 eV, built-in potential around 3.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
66
+ page_content='64 eV, and a valence band offset of 0.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
67
+ page_content='34 eV [16].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
68
+ page_content=' Despite the extensive studies on C2N based van der Waals heterostructures, significant progress has not been achieved both theoretically and experimentally.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
69
+ page_content=' As a typical case, reports on the C2N/MoS2 heterostructures are very scarce and a systematic investigation of the physical properties of this system is still lacking.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
70
+ page_content=' In this article, we report the effect of vertical, uniaxial, and biaxial strain on the photocatalytic water splitting performance of C2N/MoS2 van der Waals heterostructures through first- principles electronic structure calculations.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
71
+ page_content=' 2.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
72
+ page_content=' Results and Discussion The schematic of the crystal structure of C2N monolayer, MoS2 layer, and C2N/MoS2 heterostructure is illustrated in Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
73
+ page_content=' 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
74
+ page_content=' In C2N monolayer, twelve C-N bonds are alternately connected to the six C-C bonds in such a way that the periodic holes are present without any atom in the middle of the lattice.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
75
+ page_content=' The in-plane bond length is estimated to be around 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
76
+ page_content='43 and 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
77
+ page_content='47 ˚A for the C-C bond and 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
78
+ page_content='34 ˚A for the C-N bond, respectively which is also close to the previously reported values [17].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
79
+ page_content=' The optimized lattice constant using PBE functional is estimated to be 8.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
80
+ page_content='33 ˚A and 3.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
81
+ page_content='19 ˚A for the C2N and MoS2 monolayer, respectively which is in reasonable agreement with the reported 4 experimental and theoretical results [18, 19].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
82
+ page_content=' The heterostructure is constructed by making a supercell of (3×3×1) for C2N and (8×8×1) for MoS2 layer, respectively.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
83
+ page_content=' The corresponding lattice mismatch between the two monolayers is around 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
84
+ page_content='9% which is within the acceptable range.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
85
+ page_content=' The heterostructure after ionic relaxation results in a corrugated structure (Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
86
+ page_content=' 1d), very similar to silicene.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
87
+ page_content=' The initial van der Waals gap (3.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
88
+ page_content='5 ˚A) between the layers reduces to 3.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
89
+ page_content='373 ˚A with an optimized lattice constant of 25.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
90
+ page_content='47 ˚A (Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
91
+ page_content=' 1c, d).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
92
+ page_content=' Figure 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
93
+ page_content=' Schematic representation of the top view of isolated (a) C2N monolayer, (b) MoS2 monolayer, (c) side view and (d) top view of C2N/MoS2 heterostructure.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
94
+ page_content=' The schematic symbols of the C, N, Mo, and S atoms are indicated as blue, red, green, and brown colors, respectively.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
95
+ page_content=' The calculated electronic structure of free-standing C2N monolayer, MoS2 using the PBE functional are given in Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
96
+ page_content=' 2a,b.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
97
+ page_content=' The band dispersion for both the material indicates the presence of valence band maximum (VBM) and conduction band minimum (CBM) at the same k value in the Brillouin zone.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
98
+ page_content=' In addition, for both structures, the VBM remains close to the Fermi level as compared to the CBM.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
99
+ page_content=' This confirms that both C2N and MoS2 monolayers are p-type direct band gap semiconductors and the calculated energy gap values are estimated to be 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
100
+ page_content='735 eV and 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
101
+ page_content='645 eV, respectively.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
102
+ page_content=' It is interesting to note that the energy band dispersion in C2N monolayer is relatively flat where as MoS2 shows highly dispersive bands both in VB and CB regions.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
103
+ page_content=' Hence, it is expected that the MoS2 system will have a relatively low electron and hole effective mass along the high symmetry path (Γ-M-K-Γ) as compared to that of C2N monolayer.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
104
+ page_content=' Therefore, the electron and hole mobilities of MoS2 would be larger than that of the C2N monolayer, since the effective mass is inversely proportional to the carrier 5 mobility.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
105
+ page_content=' Figure 2e illustrates the electronic structure of C2N/MoS2 heterostructure which preserves the direct band gap behaviour of the isolated monolayers.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
106
+ page_content=' The VBM is situated close to the Fermi level suggesting that the charge carriers are of p-type.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
107
+ page_content=' However, the value of the energy gap is comparatively reduced and becomes 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
108
+ page_content='353 eV.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
109
+ page_content=' We note that the ideal band gap for a semiconductor to use more visible light is around 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
110
+ page_content='5 eV [20].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
111
+ page_content=' Figure 2.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
112
+ page_content=' Electronic band structure of (a) C2N, (b) MoS2 monolayer, (c) C2N/MoS2 heterostructure, (d-f) The total and projected density of states for the corresponding system calculated using PBE functional.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
113
+ page_content=' The dashed line in each figure indicates the Fermi level.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
114
+ page_content=' It is well known that the PBE functional severely underestimates the energy gap of the system.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
115
+ page_content=' Again calculations involving the hybrid density functional like HSE-06, B3LYP, etc are highly computationally expensive which is beyond the computational resources available to us.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
116
+ page_content=' Therefore we have further investigated the systems with SCAN meta-GGA functional.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
117
+ page_content=' The obtained results are consistent with the experiment as well as previously reported simulated results.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
118
+ page_content=' The contribution of different orbitals at the band edges is evident from the total and orbital projected density of states analysis as given in Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
119
+ page_content=' 2b-f.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
120
+ page_content=' From Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
121
+ page_content=' 2b, it is clear that the valence band of C2N is dominated by the C ‘2p’ states with a significant contribution from N ‘2p’ states as well.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
122
+ page_content=' The CBM minimum is also populated by the hybridization of the ‘p’ states of C and N atoms.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
123
+ page_content=' The partial DOS analysis of MoS2 establishes that the VBM is highly dominated by Mo ‘4d’ states with a relatively less population than S ‘3p’ states.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
124
+ page_content=' On the other hand, the CBM is mainly populated by Mo ‘4d’ states.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
125
+ page_content=' The projected DOS for the heterostructure 3 (a) 3 1 (eV) (e) (c) F 0 0 3-3 0 3 3 M r K M r M K M r K M (b) total dos 16 ((d): total dos .' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
126
+ page_content=' DOS (StatesleV) C_2P Mo_4d S_3p N_2P (f) 8 90 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 2 E-E.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
127
+ page_content=' (eV) E-E.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
128
+ page_content=' (eV) E-E.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
129
+ page_content=' (eV)6 indicates that the VBM is populated by the states from MoS2 and the CBM is dominated by the C2N.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
130
+ page_content=' It has been established that strain plays a significant role in efficiently tuning the electronic, optical, and photocatalytic properties of van der Waals heterojunctions.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
131
+ page_content=' In this section, we studied the effect of vertical strain by changing the interlayer distance between the C2N and MoS2 monolayers.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
132
+ page_content=' However, we would like to mention that experimentally, the interlayer distance can be effectively varied by changing pressure with a scanning tunneling microscopy tip [21], through vacuum thermal annealing [22], inserting a dielectric BN layer inside the van der Waals gap of the heterostructure [23], using diamond anvil cells [24].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
133
+ page_content=' The vertical strain (∆D) can be defined as ∆D = d−d0 d0 × 100, where d0 and d are the interlayer separation between C2N and MoS2 under equilibrium and strained configurations, respectively.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
134
+ page_content=' The effect of vertical strain on the band gap of the heterostructure is given in Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
135
+ page_content=' 3a.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
136
+ page_content=' It is observed that with an increase in tensile strain along the ‘z’ direction, the band gap value shows an increasing trend and exhibits a linear variation.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
137
+ page_content=' Instead, when the compressive strain between the layer is increased, the band gap decreases and follows a linear relationship with the direction of applied strain.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
138
+ page_content=' The band evolution is further analysed through the strain- dependent projected density of states (PDOS) as shown in supporting information S1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
139
+ page_content=' It is clear that the compressive strain increases the population of Mo ‘4d’ states for the VBM near the Fermi level.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
140
+ page_content=' The CBM is mainly composed of a mixture of ‘p’ states of C2N and MoS2.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
141
+ page_content=' With an increase in tensile strain both Mo ‘4d’ and C2N, MoS2 ‘p’ states move away from the Fermi level resulting in a larger band gap.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
142
+ page_content=' The band gap calculation is further analysed using the meta-GGA SCAN functional which indicates an enhanced band gap value as compared to the PBE result for the entire range of compressive and tensile strains considered.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
143
+ page_content=' The band gap variation for the compressive strain shows a nearly linear behaviour consistent with the PBE result.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
144
+ page_content=' Similarly, for the tensile configuration, the energy gap exhibits an increase in value up to 3% strain and then remains constant with further expansion in interlayer separation.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
145
+ page_content=' Figure 3.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
146
+ page_content=' Band gap tuning of C2N/MoS2 heterostructure under (a) vertical, (b) uniaxial, and (c) biaxial strain using PBE and SCAN functional 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
147
+ page_content='5 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
148
+ page_content='5 (a) (eV) (q) O-PBE 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
149
+ page_content='2 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
150
+ page_content='2 .' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
151
+ page_content='2 O-SCAN Vertical strain (c) 0.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
152
+ page_content='9 0.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
153
+ page_content='9 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
154
+ page_content='0 0.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
155
+ page_content='6 Uniaxial strain 0.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
156
+ page_content='6 Biaxialstrain 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 5 Strain (%) Strain (%) Strain (%)7 The present heterostructure is also investigated with the application of uniaxial and biaxial strain in order to study the influence of in-plane orbital overlapping.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
157
+ page_content=' The PBE result for the band gap evolution as a function of uniaxial strain is represented in Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
158
+ page_content=' 3b.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
159
+ page_content=' It is interesting to note that the band gap remains nearly linear for larger compressive strain.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
160
+ page_content=' As the compressive strain decreases from -5% to -1% the band gap shows a mild increase in value.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
161
+ page_content=' The application of tensile strain along the uniaxial direction shows a different trend as compared to the compressive one.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
162
+ page_content=' The band gap shows a systematic decrease in value with the increase in tensile strain from 0 to +5%.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
163
+ page_content=' The reduction in band gap may be due to the decrease in orbital overlapping between the ‘p’ states of C and N and the ‘4d’ states of Mo.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
164
+ page_content=' The corresponding partial density of state (See supporting information Figure S2a, b) suggests that tensile strain increases the DOS near the Fermi level for Mo ‘4d’ and C, N ‘p’ states.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
165
+ page_content=' Similarly, the band gap study was also executed by applying biaxial strain from -5% to +5% range.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
166
+ page_content=' The system shows a completely different behaviour as compared to the result for vertical strain.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
167
+ page_content=' The linear variation of the band gap for the compressive strain region remains preserved as similar to the case of uniaxial strain with a linear variation with a slowly decreasing trend.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
168
+ page_content=' However, if we apply tensile strain then the band gap decreases much more rapidly.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
169
+ page_content=' The corresponding PDOS analysis indicates that for -5% compressive strain, the VBM is mainly composed of C and N ‘2p’ states, and CBM is populated by ‘p’ states of N atoms.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
170
+ page_content=' When the strain increases from -5% to +5%, Mo ‘4d’ states become the highest occupied band near the Fermi level.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
171
+ page_content=' The CBM comes closer to the Fermi level and resulting in the reduced band gap.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
172
+ page_content=' The band gap calculation is further analysed using SCAN functional for the uniaxial and biaxial strain configuration which provides an enhanced band gap value as compared to the PBE functional.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
173
+ page_content=' However, the trend in variation of the band gap remains almost the same (Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
174
+ page_content=' 3b, c).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
175
+ page_content=' The essential requirement for any material for efficient photocatalytic water splitting application is to identify appropriate band edge positions relative to the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) potentials of the water.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
176
+ page_content=' The CBM of the material should lie above the reduction reaction potential and the VBM should lie below the oxidation reaction potential of water.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
177
+ page_content=' To estimate the band edge positions relative to the oxidation and reduction potential, the absolute energy position of the CBM and VBM are calculated with respect to the vacuum level.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
178
+ page_content=' The vacuum level for the material is obtained by calculating the local potential and then taking the average of the constant potential region.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
179
+ page_content=' In the present study, we have investigated the photocatalytic activity of the C2N/MoS2 heterostructure by applying strain in the uniaxial, biaxial, and vertical directions.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
180
+ page_content=' We note that the reduction potential (EH+/H2) and oxidation potential (EO2/H2O) of water with respect to vacuum level are -4.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
181
+ page_content='44 and -5.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
182
+ page_content='67 eV, respectively [25].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
183
+ page_content=' The band alignment is then calculated by plotting the appropriate band edge position with respect to the vacuum level as a function of strain.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
184
+ page_content=' The calculated band edge position of the CBM and VBM under the influence of vertical strain, using PBE functional is presented in Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
185
+ page_content=' 4a.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
186
+ page_content=' It was observed that 8 Figure 4.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
187
+ page_content=' Band edge position of C2N/MoS2 heterostructure as a function of vertical strain with respect to vacuum potential using (a) PBE and (b) SCAN functional.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
188
+ page_content=' The horizontal solid lines represent the water redox potentials without applying any strain, the heterostructure exhibits band edge positions within the water redox potentials of the water.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
189
+ page_content=' This result indicates that the sample is not useful to carry out photocatalytic water splitting.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
190
+ page_content=' The sample is subjected to compressive (tensile) vertical strain by reducing (increasing) the interlayer separation between the C2N and MoS2 monolayers, respectively.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
191
+ page_content=' It was observed that by applying compressive strain, the band edge positions got improved as compared to the zero strain case.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
192
+ page_content=' However, both the CBM and VBM lie within the water redox potential values.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
193
+ page_content=' Applying tensile strain, the VBM and CBM move closer to the water redox potential values but still lie below them.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
194
+ page_content=' Therefore the PBE result indicates that the application of -5 to +5% vertical strain does not enhance the band edge positions to be useful for photocatalytic water splitting.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
195
+ page_content=' However, we would like to mention that PBE functional severely underestimates the band gap and band edge positions.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
196
+ page_content=' Therefore the calculations are further executed using meta-GGA SCAN functional (Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
197
+ page_content=' 4b).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
198
+ page_content=' The result indicates a significant improvement as compared to that of the PBE functional.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
199
+ page_content=' It was observed that, without applying any strain, the VBM comes below the oxidation reaction potential, whereas the CBM moves up but still lies below the reduction potential 4.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
200
+ page_content='2 (a) 4.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
201
+ page_content='44 eV 4.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
202
+ page_content='9 VBM PBEResult CBM Energy (eV) 5.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
203
+ page_content='6 5.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
204
+ page_content='67 eV 4.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
205
+ page_content='2 (b) 4.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
206
+ page_content='44 eV 4.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
207
+ page_content='9 SCAN Result 5.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
208
+ page_content='6 5.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
209
+ page_content='67 eV 5 0 5 Strain (%)9 value.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
210
+ page_content=' The application of compressive strain up to -2% positions the VBM well below the oxidation potential of water but the CBM still lies below the reduction potential.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
211
+ page_content=' On further increase in the compressive strain from -3 to -5%, both the CBM and VBM lie outside the range of water redox potentials hence enhancing the photocatalytic activities of the sample.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
212
+ page_content=' When the heterostructure is subjected to vertical tensile strain from +1% to +5%, both the CBM and VBM straddle the water redox potential range hence enhancing the photocatalytic response under visible light.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
213
+ page_content=' There fore we conclude that the present heterostructure exhibits efficient charge separation for photocatalytic water splitting under tensile strain and larger compressive strain.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
214
+ page_content=' The sample is further subjected to uniaxial and biaxial strain to analyse the photocatalytic performance.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
215
+ page_content=' The uniaxial strain is applied by increasing or compressing the in-plane lattice constant along the X- direction keeping the Y value fixed.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
216
+ page_content=' Similarly, the biaxial strain is applied by increasing or decreasing the X-Y lattice constant values simultaneously.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
217
+ page_content=' It is to be noted that the interlayer separation is kept at its equilibrium value i.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
218
+ page_content='e 3.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
219
+ page_content='373 ˚A.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
220
+ page_content=' The detailed graphical representation of band alignment under uniaxial strain is given in the Supporting information S3 a.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
221
+ page_content=' It was observed that for PBE functionals the CBM and VBM both lie within the redox potential range for the entire range of uniaxial strain from -5 to +5%, thus indicating that uniaxial strain does not produce a significant improvement to be useful for photocatalytic water splitting.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
222
+ page_content=' To get a better result, the strain calculation is repeated for the heterostructure using SCAN functional and is given in Supporting information S3b.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
223
+ page_content=' It was observed that the application of larger uniaxial strain (-3 to -5%) puts the CBM and VBM outside the water redox potential range.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
224
+ page_content=' But the tensile strain reduces the band edge separation even below the unstrained case.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
225
+ page_content=' The VBM lies below the oxidation potential value but the CBM finds its position below the reduction potential.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
226
+ page_content=' Therefore we found that the sample can be useful for photocatalytic water splitting for larger compressive uniaxial strain whereas the tensile strain does not produce an enhancement in the photocatalytic response.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
227
+ page_content=' The present C2N/MoS2 heterostructure is also investigated under biaxial strain using both PBE and SCAN functionals (See Supporting information S4).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
228
+ page_content=' The results are quite similar to that of the uniaxial strain.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
229
+ page_content=' Like previous results, PBE functional does not produce a better result for the photocatalytic activity.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
230
+ page_content=' A larger compressive strain puts the CBM above the reduction potential but the VBM lies above the oxidation potential of water, thus not providing a useful result for our purpose.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
231
+ page_content=' Using SCAN functional, it was observed that from -2 to -5% compressive strain both the CBM and VBM straddle outside the water redox potential.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
232
+ page_content=' On the other hand, tensile strain decreases the band edges position and put the CBM below the reduction potential of water.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
233
+ page_content=' Therefore, the heterostructure can be used for photocatalytic studies for larger uniaxial and biaxial compressive strains.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
234
+ page_content=' In order to illustrate the charge transfer process between the C2N and MoS2 monolayers during the formation of the heterostructure, the charge density difference is executed using PBE functional.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
235
+ page_content=' The charge density difference is calculated by subtracting the charge density of the individual C2N and MoS2 monolayers 10 Figure 5.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
236
+ page_content=' Charge density difference of C2N/MoS2 heterostructure as a function of vertical (a) -5% compressive (b) 0% (c) +5% tensile strain from the C2N/MoS2 heterostructure.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
237
+ page_content='The charge density difference for the unstrained heterostructure is illustrated in Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
238
+ page_content=' 5b.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
239
+ page_content=' In all our charge density figures, the cyan color indicates the charge depletion and the yellow color represents the charge accumulation process.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
240
+ page_content=' From Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
241
+ page_content=' 5b, we observe that the charge accumulation mainly occurs in the interface region and partially in MoS2 monolayers, whereas most of the charge depletion occurs in the top C2N and bottom MoS2.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
242
+ page_content=' The change in charge density under vertical strain is given in Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
243
+ page_content=' 5.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
244
+ page_content=' From the Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
245
+ page_content='5a, we observe that with an increase in compressive vertical strain by 5%, there is an equal proportion of charge accumulation and depletion close to the MoS2 layer whereas the charge depletion mainly occurs in the region close to C2N layer.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
246
+ page_content=' The charge density given in cyan color near the C atom in the C2N monolayer indicates a charge depletion.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
247
+ page_content=' Similarly, the charge density given in yellow color near the S atom in the MoS2 layer indicates a charge accumulation.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
248
+ page_content=' Hence this observation indicates that there is a charge transfer from the S atom of MoS2 to the C atom of C2N monolayer.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
249
+ page_content=' The intensification of the charge transfer process under large compressive strain indicates an enhanced interaction between the two monolayers.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
250
+ page_content=' The strain-induced charge transfer in C2N based heterostructures is consistent with other literature reports [26, 27, 28].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
251
+ page_content=' When the interlayer separation in increases to achieve a strain around +5%, the charge depletion from the C2N layer almost disappears and most of the charge accumulation occurs in the interface region close to MoS2.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
252
+ page_content=' In other words, there is no appreciable charge redistribution close to the MoS2 layer.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
253
+ page_content=' This may be the influence of the van der Waals gap between the two monolayers which varies as the structure moves from a compressive strain state to a tensile strain state.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
254
+ page_content=' The effect of uniaxial compressive and tensile strain on the charge transfer process is illustrated in supplementary information Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
255
+ page_content=' S5.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
256
+ page_content=' It indicates that there is no appreciable change in the charge density difference under uniaxial compressive and tensile strain (up to 5%).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
257
+ page_content=' On the other hand application of biaxial strain indicates a significant influence on the charge density under compressive and tensile strains.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
258
+ page_content=' From (a) E.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
259
+ page_content='= -5% (b) E,= 0% (c) E.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
260
+ page_content='= +5%11 the Supplementary information Fig.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
261
+ page_content=' S6, we observe that as the system is subjected to 5% compressive strain the charge depletion occurs in the C atom of the top layer.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
262
+ page_content=' With system changes from large compression to large tensile strain state, the depletion near the C atom increases indicating more charge transfer from the S atom of MoS2 to the C atom of C2N layer.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
263
+ page_content=' Therefore we observe that both vertical and biaxial strain affects the charge transfer process significantly as compared to the uniaxial strain state.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
264
+ page_content=' 3.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
265
+ page_content=' Conclusion In summary, we have studied the photocatalytic performance of C2N/MoS2 heterostructure as a function of uniaxial, biaxial, and vertical strain configuration through first-principles DFT calculations.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
266
+ page_content=' The unstrained heterostructure possesses a direct band gap of 1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
267
+ page_content='35 eV, where the VBM is populated by Mo ‘d’ states and the CBM is contributed by ‘C’ and ‘N’ ‘p’ states.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
268
+ page_content=' The calculated position of CBM and VBM of individual monolayers indicates that the heterostructure possesses a type-II band alignment which is beneficial for charge separation across the two monolayers and preventing their recombination process.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
269
+ page_content=' The SCAN functional provides better results for the band gap and band edge positions calculation as compared to that of the PBE result.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
270
+ page_content=' Using the C2N/MoS2 heterostructure as a prototype, we have also found that the meta-GGA SCAN functional shows similar results as compared to the computationally expensive hybrid HSE functionals.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
271
+ page_content=' The estimated CBM and CBM position as a function of vertical strain indicates that the water reduction and oxidation potential values lie within the band gap region with respect to the vacuum level for larger compressive and tensile strain.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
272
+ page_content=' In contrast, the system exhibits good photocatalytic performance only for larger compression for uniaxial and biaxial strain states whereas the tensile strain reduces the separation between the VBM and CBM within the water redox potential value.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
273
+ page_content=' The charge density difference indicates a significant charge transfer for vertical and biaxial configuration as compared to the uniaxial state.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
274
+ page_content=' The present study can help researchers to reduce the computational cost by considering the meta- GGA functionals over HSE for electronic structure calculations of similar systems.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
275
+ page_content=' Our calculation will also be extremely useful for designing artificial strained heterostructure for the experimental community for better device application for photocatalytic water splitting.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
276
+ page_content=' 4.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
277
+ page_content=' Computational Methods The first principles electronic structure calculations were performed using density functional theory (DFT) with projector augmented-wave method [29] as implemented in the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP) [30].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
278
+ page_content=' The Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) [31] parametrization-based generalized gradient approximation (GGA) was chosen for the exchange-correlation functional.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
279
+ page_content=' To accurately describe the interaction between the layered structures, we have included the van der Waals correction method REFERENCES 12 (DFT-D2) presented by Grimme [32].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
280
+ page_content=' Initially, the gap between C2N and MoS2 monolayers is kept at 3.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
281
+ page_content='5 ˚A which is further optimized before running the electronic structure calculation.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
282
+ page_content=' As a benchmark, the system is further studied using strongly constrained and appropriately normed (SCAN) meta-GGA functionals to get more accurate results as compared to the PBE functional and also to be consistent with the reported experimental data.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
283
+ page_content=' A vacuum layer of 20 ˚A was selected along the ‘Z’ direction to avoid interaction between the adjacent layers.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
284
+ page_content=' The plane wave expansion cut-off was chosen to be 520 eV.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
285
+ page_content=' The Brillouin zone integration was performed using a Γ-centered (9×9×1) k-mesh for the structural relaxation and electronic structure calculation of the isolated C2N and MoS2 monolayers.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
286
+ page_content=' For the C2N/MoS2 heterostructure containing 354 atoms, the geometry optimization and electronic structure calculation are performed using a Γ centered (2×2×1) k-point samplings.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
287
+ page_content=' All the structures are allowed for relaxation to get the optimized atomic position until the total forces acting on each atom are less than 0.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
288
+ page_content='02 eV/˚A.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
289
+ page_content=' Data availability statement The additional data that support the findings of this article are available in the Supplementary Information.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
290
+ page_content=' Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank the National Institute of Science Education and Research (NISER), Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India, for funding the research work through project number RIN-4001.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
291
+ page_content=' The authors acknowledge the high-performance computing facility at NISER.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
292
+ page_content=' Data availability statement The additional data that support the findings of this article are available in the Supplementary Information.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
293
+ page_content=' Conflict of interest The authors have no conflicts to disclose.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
294
+ page_content=' References [1] Song X, Wei G, Sun J, Peng C, Yin J, Zhang X, Jiang Y and Fei H 2020 Nat.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
295
+ page_content=' Catal.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
296
+ page_content=' 3 1027–1033 [2] Takata T, Jiang J, Sakata Y, Nakabayashi M, Shibata N, Nandal V, Seki K, Hisatomi T and Domen K 2020 Nature 581 411–414 REFERENCES 13 [3] Liao J, Sa B, Zhou J, Ahuja R and Sun Z 2014 J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
297
+ page_content=' Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
298
+ page_content=' Chem.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
299
+ page_content=' C 118 17594–17599 [4] Zhang H, Zuo S, Qiu M, Wang S, Zhang Y, Zhang J and Lou X W 2020 Sci.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
300
+ page_content=' adv.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
301
+ page_content=' 6 eabb9823 [5] Chhowalla M, Shin H S, Eda G, Li L J, Loh K P and Zhang H 2013 Nat.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
302
+ page_content=' Chem.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
303
+ page_content=' 5 263–275 [6] Bonaccorso F, Colombo L, Yu G, Stoller M, Tozzini V, Ferrari A C, Ruoff R S and Pellegrini V 2015 Science 347 1246501 [7] Mahmood J, Lee E K, Jung M, Shin D, Jeon I Y, Jung S M, Choi H J, Seo J M, Bae S Y, Sohn S D et al.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
304
+ page_content=' 2015 Nat.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
305
+ page_content=' Comm.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
306
+ page_content=' 6 1–7 [8] Zhao D, Wang Y, Dong C L, Huang Y C, Chen J, Xue F, Shen S and Guo L 2021 Nat.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
307
+ page_content=' Energy 6 388–397 [9] Mahmood J, Jung S M, Kim S J, Park J, Yoo J W and Baek J B 2015 Chem.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
308
+ page_content=' Mater.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
309
+ page_content=' 27 4860–4864 [10] Ataca C, Sahin H and Ciraci S 2012 J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
310
+ page_content=' Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
311
+ page_content=' Chem.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
312
+ page_content=' C 116 8983–8999 [11] Pham K D, Hieu N N, Bui L M, Phuc H V, Hoi B D, Tu L T, Bach L G, Ilyasov V V, Amin B, Idrees M and Nguyen C V 2019 Chem.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
313
+ page_content=' Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
314
+ page_content=' Lett.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
315
+ page_content=' 716 155–161 [12] Slassi A 2022 RSC.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
316
+ page_content=' Adv.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
317
+ page_content=' 12 12068–12077 [13] Wang X, Wang Y, Quhe R, Tang Y, Dai X and Tang W 2020 J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
318
+ page_content=' Alloys Compd.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
319
+ page_content=' 816 152559 [14] Han S, Wei X, Huang Y, Zhang J and Yang J 2022 Appl.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
320
+ page_content=' Surf.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
321
+ page_content=' Sci.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
322
+ page_content=' 579 152233 [15] Wang H, Ma J, Chen Z, Yuan Y, Zhou B and Li W 2022 Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
323
+ page_content=' Chem.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
324
+ page_content=' Chem.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
325
+ page_content=' Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
326
+ page_content=' 24 17348–17360 [16] Sharma N, Kapila A, Vivek V and Sharma H 2022 Mater.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
327
+ page_content=' Today Sustain.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
328
+ page_content=' 20(100248) [17] Kishore M A and Ravindran P 2017 ChemPhysChem 18 1526–1532 [18] Wang Q H, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kis A, Coleman J N and Strano M S 2012 Nat.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
329
+ page_content=' Nanotech.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
330
+ page_content=' 7 699–712 [19] Mahmood J, Lee E K, Jung M, Shin D, Jeon I Y, Jung S M, Choi H J, Seo J M, Bae S Y, Sohn S D, Park N, Oh J H, Shin H J and Baek J B 2015 Nat.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
331
+ page_content=' Commun.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
332
+ page_content=' 6(6486) [20] Chowdhury C, Karmakar S and Datta A 2017 J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
333
+ page_content=' Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
334
+ page_content=' Chem.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
335
+ page_content=' C 121(14) 7615–7624 [21] Mudd G, Molas M, Chen X, Z´olyomi V, Nogajewski K, Kudrynskyi Z R, Kovalyuk Z D, Yusa G, Makarovsky O, Eaves L et al.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
336
+ page_content=' 2016 Sci.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
337
+ page_content=' Rep.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
338
+ page_content=' 6 1–10 [22] Tongay S, Fan W, Kang J, Park J, Koldemir U, Suh J, Narang D S, Liu K, Ji J, Li J, Sinclair R and Wu J 2014 Nano Lett.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
339
+ page_content=' 14 3185–3190 [23] Fang H, Battaglia C, Carraro C, Nemsak S, Ozdol B, Kang J S, Bechtel H A, Desai S B, Kronast F, Unal A A, Conti G, Conlon C, Palsson G K, Martin M C, Minor A M, Fadley C S, Yablonovitch E, Maboudian R and Javey A 2014 PNAS 111 6198–6202 REFERENCES 14 [24] Yankowitz M, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, San-Jose P and LeRoy B J 2016 Nat.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
340
+ page_content=' Commun.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
341
+ page_content=' 7 1–8 [25] Weast R C et al.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
342
+ page_content=' 1986 CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1983–1984 [26] Guan Z, Lian C S, Hu S, Ni S, Li J and Duan W 2017 J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
343
+ page_content=' Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
344
+ page_content=' Chem.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
345
+ page_content=' C 121 3654–3660 [27] Kishore M R A, Larsson K and Ravindran P 2020 ACS Omega 5 23762–23768 [28] Wang G, Chang J, Tang W, Xie W and Ang Y S 2022 J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
346
+ page_content=' Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
347
+ page_content=' D: Appl.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
348
+ page_content=' Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
349
+ page_content=' 55 293002 [29] Bl¨ochl P E 1994 Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
350
+ page_content=' Rev.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
351
+ page_content=' B 50 17953 [30] Kresse G and Furthm¨uller J 1996 Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
352
+ page_content=' Rev.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
353
+ page_content=' B 54 11169 [31] Perdew J P, Burke K and Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
354
+ page_content=' Rev.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
355
+ page_content=' Lett.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
356
+ page_content=' 77 3865 [32] Grimme S 2006 J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
357
+ page_content=' Comput.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
358
+ page_content=' Chem.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
359
+ page_content=' 27 1787–1799' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/INE2T4oBgHgl3EQfUAe8/content/2301.03809v1.pdf'}
ItA0T4oBgHgl3EQfCP98/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
ItFAT4oBgHgl3EQfux4k/content/tmp_files/2301.08671v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,2158 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ arXiv:2301.08671v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 20 Jan 2023
2
+ Under consideration for publication in J. Fluid Mech.
3
+ 1
4
+ Near-onset dynamics in natural doubly
5
+ diffusive convection
6
+ C´edric Beaume1, Alastair M. Rucklidge1 and Joanna Tumelty1
7
+ 1School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
8
+ (Received xx; revised xx; accepted xx)
9
+ Doubly diffusive convection is considered in a vertical slot where horizontal temperature
10
+ and solutal variations provide competing effects to the fluid density while allowing the
11
+ existence of a conduction state. In this configuration, the linear stability of the conductive
12
+ state is known, but the convection patterns arising from the primary instability have
13
+ only been studied for specific parameter values. We have extended this by determining
14
+ the nature of the primary bifurcation for all values of the Lewis and Prandtl numbers
15
+ using a weakly nonlinear analysis. The resulting convection branches are extended using
16
+ numerical continuation and we find large-amplitude steady convection states can coexist
17
+ with the stable conduction state for sub- and supercritical primary bifurcations. The
18
+ stability of the convection states is investigated and attracting travelling waves and
19
+ periodic orbits are identified using time-stepping when these steady states are unstable.
20
+ Key words: Authors should not enter keywords on the manuscript, as these must
21
+ be chosen by the author during the online submission process and will then be added
22
+ during the typesetting process (see http://journals.cambridge.org/data/relatedlink/jfm-
23
+ keywords.pdf for the full list)
24
+ 1. Introduction
25
+ Doubly diffusive convection can occur when a binary fluid is subject to external gra-
26
+ dients of temperature and of concentration. It has primarily been studied in the context
27
+ of oceanography as an important mechanism for heat and salt transport (Huppert &
28
+ Turner 1981; Schmitt 1994), since approximately 44% of the world’s oceans are known to
29
+ display this phenomenon (You 2002). Doubly diffusive convection can display a wealth of
30
+ behaviour that depends on the respective orientations of the (thermal and solutal) driving
31
+ gradients. At low latitude, oceans typically feature thermohaline staircases (Schmitt et al.
32
+ 1987, 2005), where the flow is characterised by well-mixed horizontal layers interspersed
33
+ with interfaces displaying sharp upward pointing gradients of temperature and salinity.
34
+ In configurations forced by upward gradients of salinity and temperature, fluids display
35
+ strikingly complex dynamics characterised by an alternation of well-mixed convection
36
+ zones and fingers transporting salt mostly vertically (Krishnamurti 2003, 2009). This
37
+ salt fingering instability is a natural mechanism that enhances the local mixing of the
38
+ oceans (Schmitt 1994). At high latitude, the forcing gradients typically point downwards
39
+ and perturbations to the thermohaline staircase give rise to oscillatory dynamics in a
40
+ behaviour called diffusive layering (Kelley et al. 2003; P´erez-Santos et al. 2014). Similar
41
+ doubly diffusive phenomena are also found at the Earth’s core-mantle boundary (Lay
42
+ et al. 2008), in astrophysical flows (Spiegel 1969, 1972; Bethe 1990) and in processes
43
+
44
+ 2
45
+ C. Beaume, A. M. Rucklidge and J. Tumelty
46
+ involving solidification (Wilcox 1993), such as in magma crystallisation (Huppert &
47
+ Sparks 1984).
48
+ Originally motivated by the above configurations, doubly diffusive convection has
49
+ become a paradigm for the study of fluids as dynamical systems. A large variety of flow
50
+ states comprised of convection rolls have been identified, including standing, travelling
51
+ and modulated waves (Deane et al. 1988; Kolodner 1991; Predtechensky et al. 1994).
52
+ Temporal complexity has also been found in various forms (Spina et al. 1998; Batiste
53
+ et al. 2001) and is generated in a number of ways (Knobloch et al. 1986; Rucklidge
54
+ 1992; Beaume 2020). Work focusing on steady state dynamics also revealed intricate
55
+ phenomena like spatial localisation in the presence (Mercader et al. 2009, 2011) and
56
+ in absence (Beaume et al. 2011) of Soret effect. Localised convection states, called
57
+ convectons, are found on solution branches exhibiting oscillatory trajectories in parameter
58
+ space in a behaviour called snaking (Knobloch 2015). Travelling versions of convectons
59
+ have also been found and produce an interesting hierarchy of interconnected instabilities
60
+ (Watanabe et al. 2012, 2016).
61
+ Practical considerations led to the study of inclined domains, where gravity and the
62
+ driving gradients are no longer aligned (Paliwal & Chen 1980a,b; Bergeon et al. 1999),
63
+ as well as cases in which the salinity and temperature gradients are not aligned with
64
+ each other (Tsitverblit & Kit 1993; Tsitverblit 1995; Dijkstra & Kranenborg 1996).
65
+ Motivated by solidification fronts (Wilcox 1993) and mixing currents in the vicinity
66
+ of icebergs (Huppert & Turner 1981), this article focuses on a configuration, typically
67
+ referred to as natural doubly diffusive convection, where the driving gradients are aligned
68
+ but orthogonal to gravity.
69
+ The bifurcation scenario for a range of small aspect-ratio domains was elucidated by
70
+ Xin et al. (1998) and Bergeon & Knobloch (2002), and large aspect-ratio domains were
71
+ found to support the existence of spatially localised states (Bergeon & Knobloch 2008b).
72
+ More recent work focused on a full characterisation of these localised states and on the
73
+ emergence of chaos in large aspect-ratio domains (Beaume et al. 2013a,b, 2018; Beaume
74
+ 2020). Most of the pattern formation introduced in the above references can be found
75
+ close to onset but they have, mostly, been studied for a certain set of parameter values.
76
+ Despite the fact that a comprehensive linear stability analysis in the special case of
77
+ balancing thermal and solutal gradients has been available for more than two decades
78
+ (Ghorayeb & Mojtabi 1997), the analysis for unbalanced gradients was only recently
79
+ attempted by Shankar et al. (2021). Further, little is known about the dynamics near
80
+ onset in the balanced case besides its linear regime, which makes it difficult to extrapolate
81
+ the dynamics of the system away from the parameter values used in previous studies.
82
+ Here, we perform a weakly nonlinear analysis and augment it by numerically continuing
83
+ branches of spatially periodic states in a small-aspect ratio domain. Our present work
84
+ extends the previous analyses to a wider range of parameter values. In the next section,
85
+ we present the mathematical framework associated with our case of doubly diffusive
86
+ convection. In Section 3, we detail the weakly nonlinear analysis of this system, followed
87
+ by a characterisation of the nonlinear dynamics in Section 4. We conclude in Section 5
88
+ with a short discussion.
89
+ 2. Mathematical formulation
90
+ We consider the natural doubly diffusive convection of an incompressible fluid in a
91
+ two-dimensional domain with periodic boundary conditions in the vertical direction.
92
+ The side walls are rigid, impermeable and maintained at fixed temperatures and solutal
93
+ concentration. The right wall is held at a higher temperature (T0 + ∆T ) and solutal
94
+
95
+ Near-onset dynamics in natural doubly diffusive convection
96
+ 3
97
+ x∗
98
+ z∗
99
+ u∗
100
+ w∗
101
+ g
102
+ T ∗ = T0 + ∆T,
103
+ C∗ = C0 + ∆C,
104
+ u∗ = 0,
105
+ w∗ = 0,
106
+ T ∗ = T0,
107
+ C∗ = C0,
108
+ u∗ = 0,
109
+ w∗ = 0,
110
+ L
111
+ Figure 1: Sketch of the two-dimensional domain of interest together with the dimensional
112
+ form of the boundary conditions.
113
+ concentration (C0 + ∆C) than the left wall, where the temperature is T0 and the solutal
114
+ concentration is C0. This configuration is depicted in figure 1.
115
+ The system is governed by the Navier–Stokes equation for fluid momentum, the in-
116
+ compressibility condition and advection-diffusion equations for both the temperature and
117
+ the concentration. Cross-diffusion due to the Soret and Dufour effects is not considered.
118
+ The imposed temperature and solutal concentration differences are assumed to be small
119
+ enough so that the Boussinesq approximation can be applied, whereby density variations
120
+ are neglected except in buoyancy terms. The density of the fluid is assumed to have a
121
+ linear dependence on its temperature and concentration:
122
+ ρ∗ = ρ0 + ρT (T ∗ − T0) + ρC(C∗ − C0),
123
+ (2.1)
124
+ where ρ0 is the density of the fluid at temperature T0 and concentration C0 and ρT < 0
125
+ (resp. ρC > 0) is the thermal (resp. solutal) expansion coefficient.
126
+ We introduce the non-dimensional quantities:
127
+ x = x∗
128
+ L ,
129
+ t =
130
+ t∗
131
+ L2/κ,
132
+ u = u∗
133
+ κ/L,
134
+ T = T ∗ − T0
135
+ ∆T
136
+ ,
137
+ C = C∗ − C0
138
+ ∆C
139
+ ,
140
+ p =
141
+ p∗
142
+ ρ0κν/L2 ,
143
+ (2.2)
144
+ where L is the wall separation, κ is the rate of thermal diffusivity and ν is the kinematic
145
+ viscosity. The non-dimensional governing equations for the fluid velocity u = uˆx + wˆz,
146
+ the pressure p, the temperature T and the concentration C thus read:
147
+ 1
148
+ Pr
149
+ �∂u
150
+ ∂t + u · ∇u
151
+
152
+ = −∇p + ∇2u + Ra (T + NC)ˆz,
153
+ (2.3)
154
+ ∇ · u = 0,
155
+ (2.4)
156
+ ∂T
157
+ ∂t + u · ∇T = ∇2T,
158
+ (2.5)
159
+ ∂C
160
+ ∂t + u · ∇C = 1
161
+ Le∇2C,
162
+ (2.6)
163
+ where ˆz is the vertical ascending unit vector and where we have introduced the following
164
+
165
+ 4
166
+ C. Beaume, A. M. Rucklidge and J. Tumelty
167
+ dimensionless parameters:
168
+ the Prandtl number Pr = ν
169
+ κ,
170
+ (2.7)
171
+ the Rayleigh number Ra = gL3|ρT |∆T
172
+ ρ0νκ
173
+ ,
174
+ (2.8)
175
+ the buoyancy ratio N = ρC∆C
176
+ ρT ∆T ,
177
+ (2.9)
178
+ and the Lewis number Le = κ
179
+ D,
180
+ (2.10)
181
+ where D is the rate of solutal diffusivity. The non-dimensional boundary conditions read:
182
+ u = 0,
183
+ w = 0,
184
+ − ∂p
185
+ ∂x + ∂2u
186
+ ∂x2 = 0,
187
+ T = 0,
188
+ C = 0
189
+ on
190
+ x = 0,
191
+ (2.11)
192
+ u = 0,
193
+ w = 0,
194
+ − ∂p
195
+ ∂x + ∂2u
196
+ ∂x2 = 0,
197
+ T = 1,
198
+ C = 1
199
+ on
200
+ x = 1,
201
+ (2.12)
202
+ where the pressure boundary condition is the projection of the Navier–Stokes equation
203
+ on the boundary. Each variable is periodic in the vertical direction.
204
+ We restrict our attention to the case N = −1, where the full system (2.3–2.6, 2.11, 2.12)
205
+ admits the steady conduction state with linear temperature and concentration profiles
206
+ between the side walls:
207
+ u = 0,
208
+ T = x,
209
+ C = x.
210
+ (2.13)
211
+ We further introduce convective variables as the departures of the temperature and
212
+ concentration from the conduction state:
213
+ Θ = T − x,
214
+ (2.14)
215
+ Φ = C − x.
216
+ (2.15)
217
+ Using these new variables, the conduction state takes the form
218
+ u = 0,
219
+ Θ = 0,
220
+ Φ = 0,
221
+ (2.16)
222
+ and system (2.3)–(2.6) can be written as:
223
+ 1
224
+ Pr
225
+ �∂u
226
+ ∂t + u · ∇u
227
+
228
+ = −∇p + ∇2u + Ra (Θ − Φ)ˆz,
229
+ (2.17)
230
+ ∇ · u = 0,
231
+ (2.18)
232
+ ∂Θ
233
+ ∂t + u · ∇Θ = −u + ∇2Θ,
234
+ (2.19)
235
+ ∂Φ
236
+ ∂t + u · ∇Φ = −u + 1
237
+ Le∇2Φ.
238
+ (2.20)
239
+ This formulation involving the convective variables allows the identification of two
240
+ symmetries of the system: the reflection S∆ and the continuous translation Tδ:
241
+ S∆ :
242
+ (x, z) �→ (1 − x, −z),
243
+ (u, w, Θ, Φ) �→ −(u, w, Θ, Φ),
244
+ (2.21)
245
+ Tδ :
246
+ (x, z) �→ (x, z + δ),
247
+ (u, w, Θ, Φ) �→ (u, w, Θ, Φ).
248
+ (2.22)
249
+ With periodic boundary conditions, these generate the symmetry group O(2) and restrict
250
+ the types of bifurcation that can occur from the conduction state.
251
+
252
+ Near-onset dynamics in natural doubly diffusive convection
253
+ 5
254
+ 3. Weakly nonlinear predictions
255
+ To predict the pattern formation present in our system, we start by performing the
256
+ linear stability analysis of the conduction state (u, w, p, Θ, Φ) = (0, 0, 0, 0, 0), which was
257
+ previously done by Ghorayeb & Mojtabi (1997) and by Xin et al. (1998). We briefly
258
+ rederive their results in the following subsection so that they can be applied in the later
259
+ weakly nonlinear analysis, where we derive Ginzburg–Landau equations to model the
260
+ small-amplitude behaviour close to the primary bifurcation for all Lewis and Prandtl
261
+ numbers.
262
+ 3.1. Linear stability analysis
263
+ We first consider small-amplitude stationary normal mode perturbations to the con-
264
+ duction state:
265
+ (u, w, p, Θ, Φ)T = ǫ
266
+
267
+ (U1(x), W1(x), P1(x), Θ1(x), Φ1(x))T eikz + c.c.
268
+
269
+ + O(ǫ2),
270
+ (3.1)
271
+ where c.c. denotes the complex conjugate of the preceding term, ǫ ≪ 1, k is the vertical
272
+ wavenumber and λ is the temporal growth rate of the perturbation. Inserting expansion
273
+ (3.1) into system (2.17)–(2.20) and linearising the resulting system yields the eigenvalue
274
+ problem:
275
+ L(Ra)Ψ1 = 0,
276
+ (3.2)
277
+ for Ra and Ψ1 where
278
+ Ψ1 = (U1, W1, P1, Θ1, Φ1)T eikz + c.c.,
279
+ (3.3)
280
+ and
281
+ L(Ra) =
282
+
283
+
284
+
285
+
286
+
287
+
288
+ ∇2
289
+ 0
290
+ −∂x
291
+ 0
292
+ 0
293
+ 0
294
+ ∇2
295
+ −∂z
296
+ Ra
297
+ −Ra
298
+ ∂x
299
+ ∂z
300
+ 0
301
+ 0
302
+ 0
303
+ −1
304
+ 0
305
+ 0
306
+ ∇2
307
+ 0
308
+ −1
309
+ 0
310
+ 0
311
+ 0
312
+ 1
313
+ Le∇2
314
+
315
+
316
+
317
+
318
+
319
+
320
+ .
321
+ (3.4)
322
+ The complex functions U1, W1, P1, Θ1 and Φ1 satisfy Dirichlet boundary conditions on
323
+ the side walls for the velocity, temperature and concentration perturbations:
324
+ U1(x) = W1(x) = Θ1(x) = Φ1(x) = 0
325
+ on x = 0, 1,
326
+ (3.5)
327
+ and the projection of the Navier–Stokes equation onto the boundary for the pressure
328
+ perturbation:
329
+ 0 = −∂P1
330
+ ∂x + ∂2U1
331
+ ∂2x
332
+ on x = 0, 1.
333
+ (3.6)
334
+ Solutions to (3.2–3.6) are independent of Pr and satisfy Φ1 = Le Θ1. Consequently,
335
+ the only parameter dependence in the linear problem comes from the buoyancy term in
336
+ the momentum equation, which takes the form Ra(1−Le)Θ1. The accordingly simplified
337
+ version of equation (3.2) is then solved using a spectral eigenvalue solver based on a
338
+ Chebyshev–Legendre collocation method for a range of k to determine the marginal
339
+ stability curve in figure 2. This curve reveals a minimum at kc ≈ 2.5318 and Rac|Le−1| ≈
340
+ 6509, which corresponds to the primary instability of the conduction state. The absolute
341
+ value here comes from the fact that the system resulting from left wall heating and that
342
+ resulting from right wall heating are equivalent. Contour plots presenting the fields for
343
+ the velocity components, streamfunction and convective variables of this eigenmode for
344
+ Le = 11 are shown in figure 3. The conduction state is thus first unstable to a spatially
345
+
346
+ 6
347
+ C. Beaume, A. M. Rucklidge and J. Tumelty
348
+ Figure 2: Marginal stability curve for the onset of doubly diffusive convection. The
349
+ conduction state is stable to modes with wavenumber k below the curve, and unstable
350
+ to them above. The minimum of this curve is Rac|Le − 1| ≈ 6509 with wavenumber
351
+ kc ≈ 2.5318 and corresponds to the location of the primary bifurcation.
352
+ (a)
353
+ (b)
354
+ (c)
355
+ (d)
356
+ (e)
357
+ Figure 3: Contour plots of a single wavelength of the real critical eigenvector Ψ1 for
358
+ Le = 11 (kc ≈ 2.53). The profiles show the perturbations in (a) horizontal velocity, u,
359
+ (b) vertical velocity, w, (c) velocity streamfunction, ψ, where u = −ψz and w = ψx, and
360
+ in the convective variables (d) Θ and (e) Φ. Black (grey, dotted) lines indicate positive
361
+ (negative, zero) values and are separated by 20% of the maximum absolute value.
362
+ periodic state constituted of counter-rotating convection rolls that, when Le > 1, slant
363
+ downwards from the hotter wall, filling the domain and extending to the cold wall.
364
+ The conduction state can also undergo Hopf bifurcations, where the growth rate is
365
+ purely imaginary. However, for the parameter values tested, these bifurcations occurred
366
+ for Rayleigh numbers that are orders of magnitude larger than that of the primary
367
+ stationary bifurcation and are therefore out of the scope of the present work.
368
+ 3.2. Weakly nonlinear analysis
369
+ To investigate the weakly nonlinear regime around this primary bifurcation, we set
370
+ Ra = Rac + ǫ2r with r = O(1) and ǫ ≪ 1 and assume that the system evolves on a
371
+ slow temporal scale T1 = ǫ2t. We also introduce a long spatial scale, Z = ǫz, to allow
372
+ small-amplitude states with long spatial modulations. The small-aspect ratio domains
373
+
374
+ Near-onset dynamics in natural doubly diffusive convection
375
+ 7
376
+ considered in the numerical computations in Section 4 do not permit these long-scale
377
+ modulations, so terms involving derivatives with respect to Z may be ignored in the
378
+ subsequent analysis with no effect on the main result of this section: the criticality of
379
+ the primary bifurcation. However, this long spatial variable has been included here to
380
+ broaden the scope of the analysis and will be considered in future work. We emphasise
381
+ that each of the state variables of our system—u, w, p, Θ and Φ—depend upon the
382
+ independent variables: x, z, Z and T1. Using this multiple-scales approach, the partial
383
+ derivatives become
384
+
385
+ ∂t �→ ǫ2 ∂
386
+ ∂T1
387
+ and
388
+
389
+ ∂z �→ ∂
390
+ ∂z + ǫ ∂
391
+ ∂Z .
392
+ (3.7)
393
+ Introducing the notation Ψ = (u, w, p, Θ, Φ)T , we can express each of the variables as a
394
+ perturbation expansion in ǫ about the conduction state Ψ0 = (0, 0, 0, 0, 0)T:
395
+ Ψ = Ψ0 + ǫΨ1 + ǫ2Ψ2 + . . . ,
396
+ (3.8)
397
+ where Ψj = (uj, wj, pj, θj, φj)T is the correction at O(ǫj) for j = 1, 2, . . . .
398
+ The corrections are periodic in z and also satisfy homogeneous boundary conditions
399
+ at each order in ǫ:
400
+ uj = wj = θj = φj = 0
401
+ on x = 0, 1,
402
+ j = 1, 2, . . . ,
403
+ (3.9)
404
+ as well as the pressure boundary condition:
405
+ ∂2uj
406
+ ∂x2 − ∂pj
407
+ ∂x = 0
408
+ on x = 0, 1,
409
+ j = 1, 2, . . . .
410
+ (3.10)
411
+ The expansion (3.8) is substituted into the full system (2.17–2.20) and the perturbations
412
+ are solved numerically order-by-order in ǫ using an extension of the aforementioned
413
+ collocation method. By further extracting the parameter dependence of the perturbations
414
+ at each order, we obtain a Ginzburg–Landau equation that can be applied for all
415
+ parameter values and will indicate the criticality of the primary bifurcation.
416
+ We proceed by detailing this formulation, which should be applied to the cases Le > 1
417
+ and Le < 1 separately, owing to the parameter combination Ra(1 − Le) changing sign
418
+ between them. However, the results for Le < 1 can be related to those for Le > 1 by
419
+ using an alternative non-dimensionalisation to (2.2) involving the solutal diffusivity, D,
420
+ instead of thermal diffusivity, κ, which results in a set of equations like (2.3–2.6), except
421
+ with T and C exchanged and the Lewis, Prandtl and Rayleigh numbers replaced by
422
+ the inverse Lewis number, Schmidt number, Sc = LePr, and solutal Rayleigh number,
423
+ RaS = −RaNLe, respectively.
424
+ The conduction state solves the system at leading order. At O(ǫ), the correction is
425
+ given by the solution to linear system (3.2):
426
+ Ψ1 = A1(Z, T1)
427
+
428
+ U1(x), W1(x), P1(x), Θ1(x), LeΘ1(x)
429
+ �T
430
+ eikcz + c.c.,
431
+ (3.11)
432
+ where kc is the critical wavenumber. No phase constraint is applied at this point, but the
433
+ amplitude of the eigenfunction is fixed using:
434
+ ⟨U1 , U1⟩ + ⟨W1 , W1⟩ + ⟨P1 , P1⟩ + ⟨Θ1 , Θ1⟩ = 1,
435
+ (3.12)
436
+ with the inner product:
437
+ ⟨f , g⟩ = 1
438
+ λc
439
+ � λc
440
+ 0
441
+ � 1
442
+ 0
443
+ f
444
+ T g dx dz,
445
+ (3.13)
446
+
447
+ 8
448
+ C. Beaume, A. M. Rucklidge and J. Tumelty
449
+ fij
450
+ j
451
+ 0
452
+ 1
453
+ 2
454
+ 1 U1 dU1
455
+ dx + ikcW 1U1 + c.c.
456
+ −2ikcU1
457
+ U1 dU1
458
+ dx + ikcW1U1
459
+ 2 U1 dW1
460
+ dx + ikcW 1W1 + c.c. −2ikcW1 + P1 U1 dW1
461
+ dx + ikcW 2
462
+ 1
463
+ i 3 0
464
+ −W1
465
+ 0
466
+ 4 U1 dΘ1
467
+ dx + ikcW 1Θ1 + c.c.
468
+ −2ikcΘ1
469
+ U1 dΘ1
470
+ dx + ikcW1Θ1
471
+ Table 1: Functions fij (i = 1, 2, 3, 4, j = 0, 1, 2) in the nonlinear term N2 at O(ǫ2) in
472
+ (3.14). The overbar denotes complex conjugation.
473
+ where λc = 2π/kc is the wavelength of the critical eigenvector, the overbar denotes
474
+ complex conjugation and the superscript T denotes the transposition operation when
475
+ f is a vector. Due to the lack of available explicit expressions for the solutions to this
476
+ perturbation problem, these inner products need to be computed numerically, which
477
+ we achieved by using the Clenshaw–Curtis quadrature on the collocation nodes used
478
+ in Section 3.1. The amplitude A1 evolves over both long spatial and temporal scales
479
+ according to an amplitude equation that will be determined at higher order.
480
+ At O(ǫ2), the linear operator L acts on the second-order terms and is forced by both
481
+ the nonlinear terms between the O(ǫ) corrections and terms proportional to the slow
482
+ spatial derivative of the O(ǫ) correction A1Z:
483
+ L(Rac)Ψ2 =
484
+
485
+
486
+
487
+
488
+
489
+
490
+
491
+
492
+ 1
493
+ Prf10|A1|2 +
494
+
495
+ A1Zf11eikcz + c.c.
496
+
497
+ + 1
498
+ Pr
499
+
500
+ f12A2
501
+ 1e2ikcz + c.c.
502
+
503
+ 1
504
+ Prf20|A1|2 +
505
+
506
+ A1Zf21eikcz + c.c.
507
+
508
+ + 1
509
+ Pr
510
+
511
+ f22A2
512
+ 1e2ikcz + c.c.
513
+
514
+
515
+ A1Zf31eikcz + c.c.
516
+
517
+ f40|A1|2 +
518
+
519
+ A1Zf41eikcz + c.c.
520
+
521
+ +
522
+
523
+ f42A2
524
+ 1e2ikcz + c.c.
525
+
526
+ Lef40|A1|2 +
527
+
528
+ A1Zf41eikcz + c.c.
529
+
530
+ + Le
531
+
532
+ f42A2
533
+ 1e2ikcz + c.c.
534
+
535
+
536
+
537
+
538
+
539
+
540
+
541
+
542
+
543
+
544
+ ����
545
+
546
+ N2
547
+ ,
548
+ (3.14)
549
+ where the functions fij(x) for i = 1, 2, 3, 4 and j = 0, 1, 2 are independent of Pr and Le
550
+ and are given in table 1.
551
+ To ensure the existence of a unique solution at this order, we derive a solvability
552
+ condition using the Fredholm alternative theorem. This involves the adjoint operator to
553
+ L, L†, defined through the relationship
554
+ ⟨f , Lg⟩ = ⟨L†f , g⟩,
555
+ (3.15)
556
+ which holds for all vector functions f and g. Integrating the left-hand side by parts, we
557
+ find that the adjoint operator takes the form:
558
+ L† =
559
+
560
+
561
+
562
+
563
+
564
+
565
+ ∇2
566
+ 0
567
+ −∂x
568
+ −1
569
+ −1
570
+ 0
571
+ ∇2
572
+ −∂z
573
+ 0
574
+ 0
575
+ ∂x
576
+ ∂z
577
+ 0
578
+ 0
579
+ 0
580
+ 0
581
+ Rac
582
+ 0
583
+ ∇2
584
+ 0
585
+ 0
586
+ −Rac
587
+ 0
588
+ 0
589
+ 1
590
+ Le∇2
591
+
592
+
593
+
594
+
595
+
596
+
597
+ ,
598
+ (3.16)
599
+ together with the adjoint boundary conditions:
600
+ u† = 0, w† = 0, θ† = 0, φ† = 0
601
+ on x = 0, 1,
602
+ (3.17)
603
+ ∂2u†
604
+ ∂x2 − ∂p†
605
+ ∂x = 0
606
+ on x = 0, 1,
607
+ (3.18)
608
+
609
+ Near-onset dynamics in natural doubly diffusive convection
610
+ 9
611
+ and periodicity in the vertical direction.
612
+ The Fredholm alternative allows us to pose the adjoint problem:
613
+ L†Ψ † = 0,
614
+ (3.19)
615
+ whose solution is unique up to a vertical translation and a multiplicative constant. This
616
+ solution may be written in the form:
617
+ Ψ † =
618
+
619
+ U †(x), W †(x), P †(x),
620
+ 1
621
+ 1 − LeΘ†(x), −
622
+ Le
623
+ 1 − LeΘ†(x)
624
+ �T
625
+ eikcz + c.c.,
626
+ (3.20)
627
+ where the parameter dependence of the components has been extracted. The amplitude
628
+ and phase are fixed by imposing the conditions:
629
+ ⟨U † , U †⟩ + ⟨W † , W †⟩ + ⟨P † , P †⟩ + ⟨Θ† , Θ†⟩ = 1,
630
+ (3.21)
631
+ and
632
+ Im
633
+
634
+ ⟨U † , U1⟩
635
+
636
+ = 0,
637
+ (3.22)
638
+ where Im represents the imaginary part, respectively.
639
+ Using this adjoint solution, we then apply the O(ǫ2) solvability condition:
640
+ ⟨Ψ † , N2⟩ = 0.
641
+ (3.23)
642
+ Owing to the vertical wavenumber dependence of terms in N2, the only non-trivial
643
+ contributions come from those proportional to A1Z and their complex conjugates and
644
+ equation (3.23) then reduces to
645
+ −2ikc⟨U †, U1⟩ − 2ikc⟨W †, W1⟩ + ⟨W †, P1⟩ − ⟨P †, W1⟩ − 2ikc⟨Θ†, Θ1⟩ = 0,
646
+ (3.24)
647
+ which may be further simplified to:
648
+
649
+ Ψ † , ∂LΨ
650
+ ∂kc
651
+
652
+ = 0.
653
+ (3.25)
654
+ Thus, this solvability condition is automatically satisfied as the primary bifurcation
655
+ occurs at a quadratic minimum of the marginal stability curve (see figure 2).
656
+ The O(ǫ2) system (3.14) can be solved to find that the second-order correction to the
657
+ conduction state is
658
+ Ψ2 = |A1|2Ψ 0
659
+ 2 + ((A2Ψ 1
660
+ 1 + A1ZΨ 1
661
+ 2 )eikcz + c.c.) + (A2
662
+ 1Ψ 2
663
+ 2 e2ikcz + c.c.),
664
+ (3.26)
665
+ where Ψ2 = (u2, w2, p2, θ2, φ2)T and the functions Ψ i
666
+ 2 for i = 0, 1, 2 have the following
667
+ parameter dependence:
668
+ Ψ 0
669
+ 2 =
670
+
671
+ 0, 1
672
+ Pr ˜w2 + (1 + Le) ˜w3, 1
673
+ Pr ˜p2, ˜θ3, Le2˜θ3
674
+ �T
675
+ ,
676
+ (3.27)
677
+ Ψ 1
678
+ 2 =
679
+
680
+ ˜u7, ˜w7, ˜p7, ˜θ7, Le ˜θ7
681
+ �T
682
+ ,
683
+ (3.28)
684
+ Ψ 2
685
+ 2 =
686
+ � 1
687
+ Pr
688
+
689
+ ˜u4, ˜w4, ˜p4, ˜θ4, Le˜θ4
690
+
691
+ + (1 + Le)(˜u5, ˜w5, ˜p5, 0, 0)
692
+ + (0, 0, 0, ˜θ5, Le2˜θ5) + Le(0, 0, 0, ˜θ6, ˜θ6)
693
+ �T
694
+ .
695
+ (3.29)
696
+ The newly introduced functions ˜ui, ˜wi, ˜pi and ˜θi for i = 2, ..., 7 are independent of Le
697
+ and Pr and satisfy equations (A 1–A 5) in Section A.1 of the Appendix.
698
+
699
+ 10
700
+ C. Beaume, A. M. Rucklidge and J. Tumelty
701
+ Continuing to O(ǫ3), both the deviation away from the critical Rayleigh number and
702
+ the slow time-dependence of the solution appear in the right-hand side of the resulting
703
+ system, in addition to nonlinear terms between first and second-order corrections and
704
+ terms with slow spatial derivatives. The system to solve at third-order is
705
+ L(Rac)Ψ3 =
706
+
707
+
708
+
709
+
710
+
711
+
712
+
713
+
714
+
715
+
716
+ 1
717
+ P r
718
+
719
+ ∂u1
720
+ ∂T1 + J(u, u)
721
+
722
+ − 2 ∂2u2
723
+ ∂z∂Z − ∂2u1
724
+ ∂Z2
725
+ 1
726
+ P r
727
+
728
+ ∂w1
729
+ ∂T1 + J(u, w)
730
+
731
+ − r (θ1 − φ1) − 2 ∂2w2
732
+ ∂z∂Z − ∂2w1
733
+ ∂Z2 + ∂p2
734
+ ∂Z
735
+ − ∂w2
736
+ ∂Z
737
+
738
+ ∂θ1
739
+ ∂T1 + J(u, θ)
740
+
741
+ − 2 ∂2θ2
742
+ ∂z∂Z − ∂2θ1
743
+ ∂Z2
744
+
745
+ ∂φ1
746
+ ∂T1 + J(u, φ)
747
+
748
+
749
+ 2
750
+ Le
751
+ ∂2φ2
752
+ ∂z∂Z −
753
+ 1
754
+ Le
755
+ ∂2φ1
756
+ ∂Z2
757
+
758
+
759
+
760
+
761
+
762
+
763
+
764
+
765
+
766
+
767
+
768
+ ��
769
+
770
+ N3
771
+ ,
772
+ (3.30)
773
+ where the advective terms are
774
+ J(u, f) = u1 · ∇f2 + u2 · ∇f1 + w1∂Zf1,
775
+ (3.31)
776
+ where f1 and f2, respectively, refer to the first- and second-order corrections of the
777
+ variables f = u, w, θ and φ.
778
+ The solvability condition at this order:
779
+ ⟨Ψ † , N3⟩ = 0,
780
+ (3.32)
781
+ is no longer trivially satisfied because some nonlinear terms contained in N3 have eikcz
782
+ dependence arising from terms proportional to A1, |A1|2A1, A1ZZ, A2Z and their complex
783
+ conjugates. However, the contributions to (3.32) from terms proportional to A2Z, cancel
784
+ for the same reason that the solvability condition at O(ǫ2) was satisfied. Consequently,
785
+ A2 remains arbitrary at this order. Collecting the remaining terms from equation (3.32),
786
+ we obtain the Ginzburg–Landau equation (GLE), that holds for both Le > 1 and Le < 1:
787
+ αA1T1 = γrA1 + β|A1|2A1 + δA1ZZ,
788
+ (3.33)
789
+ where table 2 indicates which terms of N3 contribute to each term above. This equation is
790
+ equivariant under the O(2) symmetry so we may chose the phase of the O(ǫ) correction so
791
+ that these coefficients are real. The coefficient δ is independent of the physical parameters
792
+ Pr and Le, while α, β and γ satisfy the relations:
793
+ α = 1
794
+ Prα1 + (1 + Le)α2,
795
+ (3.34)
796
+ β =
797
+ 1
798
+ Pr2 β1 + 1 + Le
799
+ Pr
800
+ β2 + (1 + Le2)β3 + Leβ4,
801
+ (3.35)
802
+ γ = (1 − Le)γ1,
803
+ (3.36)
804
+ where full expressions used to obtain αi, βi, γ1 and δ are provided in (A 6–A 9) and
805
+ evaluated in table 4 in Section A.2. By dividing (3.33) through by α, equation (3.33) is
806
+ more conveniently written as
807
+ A1T1 = a1rA1 + a2|A1|2A1 + a3A1ZZ,
808
+ (3.37)
809
+ where a1 = γ/α, a2 = β/α and a3 = δ/α.
810
+ The solutions to the Ginzburg–Landau equation (3.37) are good approximations of the
811
+ small-amplitude solutions of the full doubly diffusive system (2.17–2.20). Of particular
812
+ interest here are the two steady solutions that are invariant with respect to the long
813
+
814
+ Near-onset dynamics in natural doubly diffusive convection
815
+ 11
816
+ Term in the Ginzburg–Landau equation (3.33)
817
+ αA1T1
818
+ γrA1
819
+ β|A1|2A1
820
+ δA1ZZ
821
+ Terms in N3 proportional to
822
+ ∂f1
823
+ ∂T1
824
+ r(θ1 − φ1)
825
+ u1 · ∇f2
826
+ ∂2f2
827
+ ∂z∂Z
828
+ ∂f1
829
+ ∂Z2
830
+ u2 · ∇f1
831
+ ∂p2
832
+ ∂Z
833
+ ∂w2
834
+ ∂Z
835
+ Table 2: Terms from N3 (see equation (3.30)) contributing to the Ginzburg–Landau
836
+ equation (3.33). The column in which these terms are placed informs on the term to
837
+ which they contribute. Here, f1 and f2, respectively refer to first- and second-order
838
+ corrections of the variables f = u, w, θ and φ.
839
+ spatial scale Z. The first of these solutions is the trivial solution:
840
+ A1 = 0.
841
+ (3.38)
842
+ This solution is valid for all r and corresponds to the conduction state (2.16). The second
843
+ important solution is:
844
+ A1 =
845
+
846
+ −a1r
847
+ a2
848
+ �1/2
849
+ eiχ,
850
+ (3.39)
851
+ where χ is an arbitrary phase. This solution relates to states of small-amplitude spatially-
852
+ periodic convection that can be found near the primary bifurcation. These fluid states
853
+ can then be approximated by
854
+ (u, w, p, Θ, Φ)T ≈
855
+
856
+ −a1(Ra − Rac)
857
+ a2
858
+
859
+ U1(x), W1(x), P1(x), Θ1(x), LeΘ1(x)
860
+ �T
861
+ eikcz + c.c,
862
+ (3.40)
863
+ where the phase χ has been absorbed into z via a vertical translation. These states only
864
+ exist at small-amplitude for Rayleigh numbers that satisfy
865
+ a1
866
+ a2
867
+ (Rac − Ra) > 0.
868
+ (3.41)
869
+ Consequently, the sign of the ratio a1/a2 determines the criticality of the primary
870
+ bifurcation and the initial direction of branching.
871
+ Using the numerical values in table 4, we computed ai over a range of parameter
872
+ values. The coefficients a1 and a3 are positive for all Pr provided Le ̸= 1, whereas the
873
+ sign of a2 changes as these parameters are varied. As a result, there exists a boundary
874
+ in parameter space that separates regions where the primary bifurcation is subcritical
875
+ (a2 > 0) from those where it is supercritical (a2 < 0). This boundary is shown in
876
+ figure 4 and implies that, for any value of the Lewis number, there exists a critical
877
+ value of the Prandtl number, Prc(Le), expressed in terms of the physical parameters
878
+ in (A 15), above which the bifurcation is subcritical. This critical value tends to 0.376
879
+ for small Lewis numbers while it approaches the asymptotic relation Prc ∼ 0.376/Le
880
+ as the Lewis number tends to infinity. We further note that the parameter values for
881
+ physical doubly diffusive systems from Schmitt (1983) all lie within the region where the
882
+ primary bifurcation is subcritical. While we are unaware of further fluid systems lying
883
+ within the supercritical region of parameter space, we expect that they exist since some of
884
+ the physical systems identified in figure 4, including humidity/ heat and stellar interiors
885
+
886
+ 12
887
+ C. Beaume, A. M. Rucklidge and J. Tumelty
888
+ Figure 4: Boundary a2 = 0 in (Le, Pr) parameter space separating the region where the
889
+ primary bifurcation from the conduction state is subcritical (above) from that where it is
890
+ supercritical (below). The conduction state is linearly stable for all Ra at Le = 1 and this
891
+ point is indicated by the open circle. The grey regions indicate parameter values from
892
+ Schmitt (1983) for the physical doubly diffusive systems: (1) salt/sugar, (2) magmas,
893
+ (3) oxide semiconductors, (4) heat/salt 0◦C, (5) heat/salt 30◦C, (6) humidity/heat, (7)
894
+ liquid metals and (8) stellar interiors.
895
+ (marked (6) and (8), respectively), have parameter values that are within an order of
896
+ magnitude of the sub/supercritical boundary.
897
+ We can gain physical insight into the criticality of the primary bifurcation by examining
898
+ the contributions that each of the nonlinear terms from equations (2.3–2.6) make to a2,
899
+ using a similar approach to the one Requil´e et al. (2020) applied to plane Poiseuille and
900
+ plane Couette flows with viscous dissipation. The expression of the coefficient β (3.35)
901
+ and the corresponding numerical values provided in table 4 in the Appendix, show that
902
+ the inertial term u · ∇u (contributing to β1 and β2) provides a negative contribution
903
+ to a2, whereas thermal u · ∇T and solutal u · ∇C advective terms (mostly contributing
904
+ to β3 and ��4) provide a positive contribution to a2. The latter statement is further
905
+ justified in Section A.3 in the Appendix. It is therefore solutal and thermal advection in
906
+ the system that drives the subcriticality of the primary bifurcation, while inertial effects
907
+ drive the supercriticality. Thus, reducing the Prandtl number reduces the subcriticality
908
+ of the bifurcation since the effects of inertia are strengthened.
909
+ The final term in the Ginzburg–Landau equation (3.37), a3A1ZZ, allows small-
910
+ amplitude solutions of the doubly diffusive system to exhibit long scale amplitude
911
+ modulation. These solutions include phase-winding states that describe patterns whose
912
+ wavenumbers are close to the critical wavenumber kc (Cross et al. 1983), and spatially
913
+ modulated states that can develop into localised states away from the primary bifurcation
914
+ (Bergeon & Knobloch 2008a). These are out of the scope of the present work, but we
915
+ will consider the effect of the term a3A1ZZ on spatially localised states in future work.
916
+ 4. Fully nonlinear behaviour
917
+ Having established the region of (Le, Pr) parameter space in which the bifurcation is
918
+ subcritical, we can now investigate the nonlinear behaviour of the system near the onset
919
+ of convection. In particular, we focus on the structure and stability of the primary branch
920
+ of spatially periodic convection states with wavenumber kc as it extends towards larger
921
+ amplitudes. For this, we consider a single-wavelength domain with Lz = λc = 2π/kc,
922
+
923
+ Near-onset dynamics in natural doubly diffusive convection
924
+ 13
925
+ which precludes modulational instabilities arising in large domains that are captured by
926
+ our weakly nonlinear analysis through the A1ZZ term in equation (3.37).
927
+ We numerically continue the primary branch against the Rayleigh number across a
928
+ range of Lewis (Le ∈ [5, 100]) and Prandtl (Pr ∈ [2 × 10−3, 10]) numbers. Cases for
929
+ which Le < 1 can be extrapolated from our results by a suitable transformation. The
930
+ solution branches will be identified on bifurcation diagrams showing either the total
931
+ kinetic energy of steady states:
932
+ E = 1
933
+ 2
934
+ � λc
935
+ 0
936
+ � 1
937
+ 0
938
+
939
+ u2 + w2�
940
+ dx dz,
941
+ (4.1)
942
+ or the average velocity ∥u∥2 =
943
+
944
+ 2E/λc, against the Rayleigh number Ra.
945
+ Computations were carried out using a spectral element numerical method based on a
946
+ Gauss–Lobatto–Legendre discretisation (Bergeon & Knobloch 2002) and supplemented
947
+ by Stokes preconditioning with ∆t = 0.1, as detailed by Beaume (2017). Numerical
948
+ results were validated against a discretisation of up to 4 spectral elements with 29 nodes
949
+ in both the x and z directions. The stability of the steady states was computed using an
950
+ Arnoldi method based on a time-stepping scheme (Mamun & Tuckerman 1995). Further
951
+ direct numerical simulations used a stiffly stable second-order splitting scheme based on
952
+ Karniadakis et al. (1991) with time-step ∆t = 10−3.
953
+ 4.1. Bifurcation structure
954
+ The results can be summarised by dividing parameter space according to the qual-
955
+ itative nature of the bifurcation diagram. Figure 5(a) indicates the four main regimes
956
+ found. Region (1) describes the moderate and large Pr behaviour for all Le. In this
957
+ region, the primary bifurcation is strongly subcritical and the primary branch has a
958
+ single saddle-node, as shown in figure 5(b). Parameter values within this region have
959
+ received the most attention in previous studies focusing on subcritical pattern formation
960
+ (e.g. see (Xin et al. 1998; Bergeon & Knobloch 2008b)). Region (2) occupies a small
961
+ region of parameter space above the boundary Pr = Prc, where the primary bifurcation
962
+ is weakly subcritical, and separates the typical subcritical behaviour in region (1) from
963
+ the supercritical behaviour in regions (3) or (4). The steady convection state branches
964
+ typically have three saddle-nodes in region (2), as exemplified in figure 5(c). Regions (3)
965
+ and (4) identify the two qualitatively different types of bifurcation diagrams observable
966
+ when the primary bifurcation is supercritical. In both cases, the primary branch has two
967
+ saddle-nodes, with the first lying in the supercritical region Ra > Rac. The difference
968
+ between the regions is the location of the second saddle-node: in region (3), it is found
969
+ for Ra < Rac (see figure 5(d)), whereas, in region (4), it is found in Ra > Rac (see
970
+ figure 5(e)). Consequently, a large-amplitude convection state may coexist with the stable
971
+ conduction state when the primary bifurcation is supercritical, but, for sufficiently small
972
+ Pr, steady convection states are found entirely within the supercritical region, where the
973
+ conduction state is unstable. There may exist a fifth region, where the primary branch
974
+ increases monotonically in both Rayleigh number and in amplitude, but we have not
975
+ identified it in this study.
976
+ We now determine the structure of the primary branch as Pr decreases for a fixed value
977
+ of Le. To achieve this, we follow the locations of its three saddle-nodes with respect to
978
+ Ra and Pr. In doing so, we observed two different scenarios according to whether the
979
+ pair of saddle-nodes are created on the lower or upper part of the primary branch.
980
+ These are exemplified in figure 6 for Le = 11 (representative of 5 ⩽ Le ≲ 15) and
981
+ Le = 20 (representative of 19 ≲ Le < 100). Since the transition between the two scenarios
982
+
983
+ 14
984
+ C. Beaume, A. M. Rucklidge and J. Tumelty
985
+ (a)
986
+ (b) Region 1
987
+ (c) Region 2
988
+ (d) Region 3
989
+ (e) Region 4
990
+ Figure 5: (a) Enlargement of a subset of the parameter space shown in figure 4 showing
991
+ four regions where the bifurcation diagrams exhibit qualitatively different behaviours.
992
+ The thick line separates subcritical from supercritical branching, while the additional
993
+ region boundaries are identified with either dotted or dashed lines. (b–e) Representative
994
+ bifurcation diagrams for parameter values within each of the four regions. The stability
995
+ of the branch segments are also indicated using thick lines for stable solutions, thin lines
996
+ for solutions unstable to amplitude perturbations and dashed lines for solutions unstable
997
+ to drift. The location of bifurcations depend upon the specific parameter values used, so
998
+ those used for each sketch have been marked in panel (a).
999
+ 7(a)
1000
+ 7(b)
1001
+ 7(c)
1002
+ 7(e)
1003
+ 7(f)
1004
+ 7(d)
1005
+ (a)
1006
+ 7(g)
1007
+ 7(h)
1008
+ 7(k)
1009
+ 7(l)
1010
+ 7(i)
1011
+ 7(j)
1012
+ (b)
1013
+ Figure 6: Location of the three saddle-node bifurcations of the primary branch in (Ra, Pr)
1014
+ parameter space for (a) Le = 11 and (b) Le = 20. The dashed line marks the critical
1015
+ Rayleigh number at which the primary bifurcation is found, Rac, and the cross marks the
1016
+ codimension two point (Rac, Prc) explained in the text. The insets provide enlargements
1017
+ of the area around Rac in each case. Arrows mark the bifurcation diagrams shown in
1018
+ figure 7.
1019
+
1020
+ Near-onset dynamics in natural doubly diffusive convection
1021
+ 15
1022
+ (a)
1023
+ (b)
1024
+ (c)
1025
+ (d)
1026
+ (e)
1027
+ (f)
1028
+ (g)
1029
+ (h)
1030
+ (i)
1031
+ (j)
1032
+ (k)
1033
+ (l)
1034
+ Figure 7: Bifurcation diagram showing the primary branch of steady convection and the
1035
+ stability of the related states across the four regions, indicated in the top left corner.
1036
+ Thick lines indicate stable solutions, thin lines indicate solutions unstable to amplitude
1037
+ perturbations and dashed lines indicate solutions unstable to drift. Saddle-nodes are
1038
+ marked by symbols: SN1 (filled circle), SN2 (asterisk) and SN3 (triangle). The open circle
1039
+ corresponds to the destabilising drift bifurcation. The parameter values, also indicated
1040
+ by the arrows in figure 6, are: Le = 11, and (a) Pr = 1, (b) Pr = 0.1, (c) Pr = 0.042,
1041
+ (d) Pr = 0.032, (e) Pr = 0.01, (f) Pr = 0.005; as well as Le = 20, and (g) Pr = 1, (h)
1042
+ Pr = 0.1, (i) Pr = 0.023, (j) Pr = 0.02, (k) Pr = 0.01 and (l) Pr = 0.005. For Le = 11
1043
+ (resp. Le = 20), Prc ≈ 0.031, Prcusp ≈ 0.033 (resp. Prc ≈ 0.018, Prcusp ≈ 0.023).
1044
+ occupies a small region of parameter space within region (2) for 15 ≲ Le ≲ 19, we did
1045
+ not investigate it any further.
1046
+ To help interpret the plots in figure 6, figure 7 demonstrates the evolution of the
1047
+ bifurcation diagrams as Pr decreases for Le = 11 (panels (a–f)) and Le = 20 (panels
1048
+ (g–l)). The structure of the bifurcation diagrams in region (1), for high Pr, remain
1049
+ similar, as shown in figures 7(a) and 7(g). From the primary bifurcation, the primary
1050
+ branch extends towards lower Rayleigh numbers and proceeds to turn around at a saddle-
1051
+ node, hereafter referred to as SN1, before heading towards large amplitude convection
1052
+ states at large Ra. Figure 6 suggests that, as Pr → ∞, the location of SN1 tends to a
1053
+ constant Rayleigh number, dependent upon Le. This figure also shows that SN1 occurs
1054
+ at larger Ra as the Prandtl number is decreased and the primary bifurcation becomes
1055
+ less subcritical.
1056
+ Upon decreasing the Prandtl number, the primary branch undergoes a cusp bifurcation
1057
+ at Pr ≈ Prcusp(Le) > Prc(Le), while still subcritical, denoting the beginning of
1058
+ region (2). The cusp produces two additional saddle-nodes along the primary branch:
1059
+ SN2 and SN3. The exact process by which this is achieved depends on the Lewis number.
1060
+ For Le ≲ 15, the cusp bifurcation occurs at smaller amplitude than SN1 and the saddle-
1061
+ nodes are labelled SN3, SN2, SN1 as the branch is followed in the direction of increasing
1062
+
1063
+ 16
1064
+ C. Beaume, A. M. Rucklidge and J. Tumelty
1065
+ Figure 8: Saddle-node locations for Le = 5 (green), Le = 11 (purple), Le = 20 (blue)
1066
+ and Le = 50 (red). The black dashed line marks the location of the primary bifurcation
1067
+ and the red cross marks the codimension two point where the criticality of the primary
1068
+ bifurcation changes, at Pr = Prc. The black dashed line represents relationship (4.2).
1069
+ Saddle-nodes are marked by circles for SN1 asterisks for SN2 and triangles for SN3.
1070
+ energy (see, for example, figure 7(d) for Le = 11 and Pr = 0.032, near the cusp parameter
1071
+ value: Prcusp ≈ 0.033). In contrast, for Le ≳ 19, the cusp bifurcation occurs at higher
1072
+ amplitude than SN1 and saddle-nodes are labelled SN1, SN2, SN3, as shown in figure 7(i)
1073
+ for Le = 20, Pr = 0.023 ≈ Prcusp.
1074
+ Continuing to reduce Pr across region (2) (from Prcusp to Prc), the Rayleigh number
1075
+ associated with SN2 increases so that it reaches the supercritical region before Pr = Prc.
1076
+ During this transition, the saddle-node with smallest amplitude (SN3 for Le ≲ 15; SN1
1077
+ for Le ≳ 19) moves to larger Rayleigh numbers but with decreasing amplitude until it
1078
+ collides with the primary bifurcation at Pr = Prc and Ra = Rac, where the primary
1079
+ bifurcation changes from subcritical to supercritical. This process is highlighted in the
1080
+ insets of figure 6 and results in the primary branch possessing only two saddle-nodes in
1081
+ the supercritical regime (Pr < Prc).
1082
+ The locations of the remaining two saddle-nodes go toward larger Ra as Pr decreases
1083
+ and are found in the supercritical region (Ra > Rac) in region (4), as shown in
1084
+ figure 5. It is therefore clear that multiple steady convection states can exist for the
1085
+ same parameter values near the onset of convection, regardless of the criticality of the
1086
+ primary bifurcation. This result extends earlier observations on the number of saddle-
1087
+ node bifurcations occurring along the primary branch in related systems (Tsitverblit &
1088
+ Kit 1993).
1089
+ More insight into these results can be obtained by representing, as in figure 8, the
1090
+ location of the saddle-nodes for various Lewis numbers as a function of the reduced
1091
+ Prandtl number Pr/Prc and combined parameter Ra|Le−1|. These reduced parameters
1092
+ allows us to identify the location where the criticality of the primary bifurcation changes
1093
+ as the single coordinate point: Pr/Prc = 1, Ra|Le − 1| ≈ 6509.
1094
+ Figure 8 shows that, for Pr < Prc and the chosen values of the Lewis number, the
1095
+ location of the first supercritical saddle-node SN2 can be approximated by:
1096
+ RaSN2 ≈
1097
+ 6460
1098
+ |Le − 1|
1099
+ � Pr
1100
+ Prc
1101
+ �−0.24
1102
+ .
1103
+ (4.2)
1104
+
1105
+ Near-onset dynamics in natural doubly diffusive convection
1106
+ 17
1107
+ For Pr < 10−2 (not shown), the location of saddle-node SN2 deviates from the relation
1108
+ above, indicating a potentially different asymptotic regime. These results also illustrate
1109
+ the large Pr behaviour of the subcritical saddle-node SN1: RaSN1|Le − 1| tends to a
1110
+ constant as the Prandtl number tends to infinity. This constant increases with Le and
1111
+ saturates for large values of the Lewis number. These results echo those obtained in
1112
+ doubly diffusive convection in a 2D vertical porous enclosure, where Mamou et al. (1998)
1113
+ used a parallel flow approximation to demonstrate that the Rayleigh number at which
1114
+ the subcritical saddle-node occurs is proportional to 1/(1 − Le) for large enough Lewis
1115
+ numbers.
1116
+ 4.2. Solution profiles
1117
+ Despite the different scenarios obtained at different values of the Prandtl number (see
1118
+ figure 5), the steady convection states undergo similar structural changes along their
1119
+ branch, as evidenced in figure 9 for Le = 11 and Pr = 1, 0.032, 0.01 and 0.005. The
1120
+ streamfunction profiles are similar near the primary bifurcation regardless of the value of
1121
+ the Prandtl number (see second column of figure 9), which is in agreement with the linear
1122
+ stability results from figure 3(c). Moving along the branches in the direction of increasing
1123
+ energy, the first change that we observe is the strengthening of the anticlockwise roll,
1124
+ where fluid near the hotter wall moves upwards. This occurs in both the subcritical and
1125
+ the supercritical regimes, as can be seen in the third column of figure 9. Continuing the
1126
+ branches to the large-amplitude saddle-node and beyond, the amplitude of the weaker roll
1127
+ decreases, leaving room for the stronger roll to straighten. At large enough amplitude, an
1128
+ anticlockwise roll occupies the domain, irrespective of the value of Pr. Its amplitude grows
1129
+ as the upper branch is followed to larger values of Ra, where the Prandtl number starts
1130
+ to impact the flow: the roll occupies a smaller area at lower values of the Prandtl number,
1131
+ as seen within the final column of figure 9. This resembles the fly-wheel convection, with
1132
+ nearly circular streamlines, seen in low-Prandtl Rayleigh–B´enard convection as studied
1133
+ by Clever & Busse (1981).
1134
+ To characterise these observations in more detail, figure 10 reports the horizontal
1135
+ velocity profiles observed on the upper branch for Pr = 1, 0.1, 0.032 and 0.005. The
1136
+ decrease in roll size is apparent when Pr is decreased. This is particularly evident for
1137
+ Pr = 0.005, where the horizontal velocity remains small except within the range 0.6 ≲
1138
+ z ≲ 1.9, in such a way that the roll only occupies about half of the domain’s extent.
1139
+ Figure 10(a) additionally shows the transition to these states from the large rolls observed
1140
+ at O(1) Prandtl numbers. For Pr = 1, the maximum horizontal velocity is achieved far
1141
+ from the center of the roll, at z ≈ 0.44, 2.04, producing a region of strong shear between
1142
+ the rolls and gentle quasi-linear velocity variations inside the rolls. As Pr is lowered, these
1143
+ maxima move towards the centre of the roll by initially becoming less pronounced and
1144
+ creating flatter extrema (see figure 10(c)), followed by the emergence of peaks at z = 1
1145
+ and z ≈ 1.5. The maximum horizontal velocity does not change significantly within this
1146
+ range of Prandtl number values in such a way that the low Pr rolls represent narrow
1147
+ regions of strong shear surrounded by low amplitude flow.
1148
+ 4.3. Stability of the nonlinear states
1149
+ The stability of states on the primary branch is controlled by two eigenmodes: an
1150
+ amplitude mode that preserves the S∆ symmetry of the system and a drift mode that
1151
+ breaks the S∆ symmetry. The translation mode, associated with vertical translations due
1152
+ to the symmetry Tδ, remains marginal along the branch and none of the other eigenmodes
1153
+ become destabilising over the range of parameters considered.
1154
+
1155
+ 18
1156
+ C. Beaume, A. M. Rucklidge and J. Tumelty
1157
+ Pr = 1
1158
+ Pr = 0.032
1159
+ Pr = 0.01
1160
+ Pr = 0.005
1161
+ Figure 9: Streamfunctions of the steady states on the primary branch when Le = 11
1162
+ for different values of the Prandtl number: top row Pr = 1, second row Pr = 0.032,
1163
+ third row Pr = 0.01 and bottom row Pr = 0.005. The left column shows the respective
1164
+ bifurcation diagrams and indicates with a cross the solutions that have been represented
1165
+ in the subsequent panels. Black (grey, dotted) contours indicate positive (negative, zero)
1166
+ values of the streamfunction. Contour intervals: first column, top two rows—10−4; first
1167
+ column, third row—10−5; first column, bottom row—2 × 10−5; second column, top two
1168
+ rows—0.02; second column, bottom two rows—0.01; third column—0.02; fourth and fifth
1169
+ columns—0.05.
1170
+
1171
+ Near-onset dynamics in natural doubly diffusive convection
1172
+ 19
1173
+ (a)
1174
+ (b)
1175
+ (c)
1176
+ (d)
1177
+ (e)
1178
+ Figure 10: Horizontal velocity and streamfunction of solutions from the upper segment of
1179
+ the primary branch at Ra = 700 for Pr = 1, 0.1, 0.032, 0.005 and Le = 11 represented
1180
+ via (a) the midline horizontal velocity (u(x = 0.5, z)) and streamfunction contours plots
1181
+ for (b) Pr = 1, (c) Pr = 0.1, (d) Pr = 0.032 and (e) Pr = 0.005 with contour intervals
1182
+ 0.1.
1183
+ Close to the onset of convection, the amplitude mode is initially destabilising when
1184
+ the bifurcation is subcritical (Pr > Prc), whereas it is stabilising when the bifurcation is
1185
+ supercritical (Pr < Prc). This mode subsequently changes stability at successive saddle-
1186
+ nodes. In particular, it becomes stabilising at saddle-nodes SN1 and SN3, where the
1187
+ branch turns towards higher Ra, but becomes destabilising at SN2, where the branch
1188
+ turns towards lower Ra. As a result, the upper branches of steady convection states are
1189
+ always stable to amplitude perturbations for all Le and Pr.
1190
+ The drift mode is stabilising near the primary bifurcation at Ra = Rac for all Pr,
1191
+ but becomes destabilising at a drift-pitchfork bifurcation further along the branch at
1192
+ Ra = Rad, whose location depends upon both Le and Pr, as can be seen in figure 7.
1193
+ The marginal mode is identical to the translation mode at this bifurcation and its
1194
+ destabilisation leads to a pair of branches of travelling wave solutions, as shown in figure
1195
+ 11(a) for Pr = 0.1 and Le = 11. Close to their onset, these states take the form of a
1196
+ single large-amplitude convection roll (see figure 11(c)) that slowly drifts either upwards
1197
+ or downwards. As these branches are followed beyond the drift bifurcation, an asymmetric
1198
+ streaming flow strengthens while the convection roll weakens and moves toward the wall
1199
+ where the streaming flow is the weakest. This transition is shown from figure 11(b) at
1200
+ Ra = 630 to figure 11(d) at Ra = 700. At the same time, the drift speed increases at
1201
+ a rate approximately proportional to √Ra − Rad, as shown in figure 11(e). This result
1202
+ extends the findings obtained for Le = 1.2, Pr = 1 by Xin et al. (1998) to a wider range
1203
+ of parameter values.
1204
+ The stability of the travelling waves is determined by the location of the drift bifurca-
1205
+ tion: these states are initially stable when the bifurcation occurs on the upper branch of
1206
+ steady convection states, whereas they are unstable when the bifurcation occurs along
1207
+ the lower branch. Both cases can be achieved for a given Le when Pr is varied, as figure 7
1208
+ illustrates for selected values of the Prandtl number with Le = 11 and Le = 20. For large
1209
+ values of the Prandtl number, the drift bifurcation occurs on the upper branch at large
1210
+ Rayleigh numbers. This location moves closer to the saddle-node with decreasing Prandtl
1211
+ numbers so that the two coincide at Pr = Pr∗ and Ra = Ra∗. For Le = 11, we found
1212
+
1213
+ 20
1214
+ C. Beaume, A. M. Rucklidge and J. Tumelty
1215
+ (a)
1216
+ (b)
1217
+ (c)
1218
+ (d)
1219
+ (e)
1220
+ Figure 11: Drift bifurcation and downward travelling waves for Pr = 0.1, Le = 11, for
1221
+ which Rad ≈ 638. (a) Bifurcation diagram showing the kinetic energy E as a function of
1222
+ the Rayleigh number Ra for steady states and travelling waves. Thick lines indicate stable
1223
+ solutions, thin lines indicate solutions unstable to amplitude perturbations and dashed
1224
+ lines indicate solutions unstable to drift. The drift bifurcation is shown by the open circle.
1225
+ (b) Stable convection state at Ra = 630 shown by contours of its streamfunction with
1226
+ intervals 0.1 (first red cross on panel (a)). Further panels show similar representations
1227
+ of stable travelling waves at: (c) Ra = 645 and (d) Ra = 700. (e) Squared drift speed
1228
+ along the stable branch as a function of the Rayleigh number. The dotted line shows the
1229
+ fitting law: vd ≈ 0.12
1230
+
1231
+ Ra − 640.
1232
+ that Pr∗ ≈ 0.042 and Ra∗ ≈ 614.9 (see figure 7(c) for a bifurcation diagram at similar
1233
+ values of the parameters). For smaller values of the Prandtl number, the drift bifurcation
1234
+ occurs along the lower branch of convection states and at a value of the Rayleigh number
1235
+ that increases as Pr is decreased. For all the parameter values tested, this bifurcation
1236
+ was found to occur at larger amplitude than saddle-node SN2 and, consequently, the
1237
+ small-amplitude steady convection states remain stable to drift.
1238
+ 4.4. Dynamical attractors
1239
+ The temporal dynamics of the system change as the drift bifurcation passes below the
1240
+ subcritical saddle-node since all the steady convection states from the upper branch and
1241
+ the travelling wave states are destabilised in the process. Many initial conditions will
1242
+ consequently decay towards the conduction state at low Pr and Ra. This decay is not
1243
+ possible when the conduction state is unstable for Ra > Rac, where we find that the
1244
+ dynamics converge on time-dependent states.
1245
+ To understand how this behaviour arises, we unfold the saddle-node-pitchfork normal
1246
+ form near the codimension two point (Ra∗, Pr∗) where the drift bifurcation and saddle-
1247
+ node coincide. This unfolding takes the form (Guckenheimer & Holmes 1983):
1248
+ ˙x = −µ1x + b1xz,
1249
+ (4.3)
1250
+ ˙z = µ2 − x2 − z2 + b2z3,
1251
+ (4.4)
1252
+ where x represents the extent to which the state drifts, z represents the amplitude of the
1253
+ convection states, b1 > 0, b2 < 0, and µ1 and µ2 are two unfolding parameters that are
1254
+ introduced to respectively represent the deviations Pr − Pr∗ and Ra − Ra∗.
1255
+ When µ1 = µ2 = 0, the trivial state, (x, z) = (0, 0), undergoes a codimension two
1256
+ bifurcation. One of five phase portraits is observed in the vicinity of this bifurcation and
1257
+ these are shown in figure 12(a). In addition to the steady states previously discussed, the
1258
+
1259
+ Near-onset dynamics in natural doubly diffusive convection
1260
+ 21
1261
+ µ1
1262
+ µ2
1263
+ V
1264
+ IV
1265
+ III
1266
+ II
1267
+ I
1268
+ Pitchfork
1269
+ Heteroclinic
1270
+ connection
1271
+ Hopf
1272
+ Pitchfork
1273
+ Saddle-node
1274
+ (a)
1275
+ 13(a)
1276
+ 13(b)
1277
+ 13(f)
1278
+ (b)
1279
+ 13(c)
1280
+ 13(d)
1281
+ 13(e)
1282
+ (c)
1283
+ Figure 12: (a) Unfolding near the codimension two saddle-node-pitchfork bifurcation at
1284
+ µ1 = µ2 = 0 given by system (4.3, 4.4), after Guckenheimer & Holmes (1983). The
1285
+ different phase portraits are classified in five different regions labelled using Roman
1286
+ numerals and accompanied with a sketch of the corresponding phase space. In each
1287
+ of these sketches, the fixed points on the vertical line represent steady convection states.
1288
+ The vertical (resp. horizontal) direction is the eigendirection related to the amplitude
1289
+ (resp. drift) mode. (b) Analogy with the doubly diffusive convection problem is made by
1290
+ replacing µ1 by Pr−Pr∗ and µ2 by Ra−Ra∗ and regions of the (Ra, Pr) parameter space
1291
+ are shown as a function of the observed temporal behaviour for Le = 11. (c) Magnification
1292
+ of panel (b) near (Ra∗, Pr∗). Arrows indicate the values of Pr used to produce the
1293
+ bifurcation diagrams in figure 13. In the panels, the bifurcations are represented by:
1294
+ black and red solid lines (saddle-nodes), blue dotted lines (drift bifurcation), red dotted
1295
+ lines (Hopf bifurcation), red dot-dashed lines (heteroclinic connection) and in panels (b)
1296
+ and (c), the vertical dashed lines (primary stationary bifurcation of the conduction state).
1297
+ unfolding reveals the presence of periodic orbits. Relating the unfolding back to doubly
1298
+ diffusive convection, these correspond to relative periodic orbits consisting of drifting
1299
+ states that originate either from a travelling wave undergoing a Hopf bifurcation or from
1300
+ a global bifurcation where two steady convection states connect heteroclinically.
1301
+ Although the normal form (4.3, 4.4) only formally represents the dynamics of the
1302
+ full system close to the codimension two point, each of the regions shown in figure 12
1303
+
1304
+ 22
1305
+ C. Beaume, A. M. Rucklidge and J. Tumelty
1306
+ Stable in region?
1307
+ State Oa Ob Ia Ib IIa IIb IIIa IIIb IVa IVb IVc Va Vb
1308
+ O
1309
+ x
1310
+ x
1311
+ x
1312
+ x
1313
+ x
1314
+ x
1315
+ x
1316
+ SOCs
1317
+ x
1318
+ x
1319
+ x
1320
+ x
1321
+ SOCl
1322
+ x
1323
+ x
1324
+ T W
1325
+ x
1326
+ x
1327
+ PO
1328
+ x
1329
+ x
1330
+ Table 3: Stability of the observed doubly diffusive states within each region of the
1331
+ parameter space from figure 12. The naming convention used is as follows: O, conduction
1332
+ state; SOCs, small-amplitude stationary overturning convection; SOCl, large-amplitude
1333
+ stationary overturning convection; T W, travelling wave; and PO, relative periodic orbit.
1334
+ The regions Oa, ..., Vb refer to the regions introduced in figure 12.
1335
+ continues to be observed an appreciable distance away from this point. Figures 12(b)
1336
+ and (c) illustrate the extent of the corresponding regions in the doubly diffusive system
1337
+ when Le = 11 and we anticipate that similar results will hold for other values of
1338
+ the Lewis number. In this figure, the regions have been subdivided according to the
1339
+ types of stable attracting states that they display. The subdivisions occur owing to the
1340
+ instability of the conduction state at Rac and the creation of a pair of saddle-nodes at
1341
+ (Racusp, Prcusp), which enrich the previous unfolding. The resulting subregions, together
1342
+ with their associated attracting states, are summarised in table 3 and on the bifurcation
1343
+ diagrams in figure 13. As Pr varies, the system admits one of seven qualitatively distinct
1344
+ bifurcation diagrams. Six of these are presented in figure 13, which also indicate the
1345
+ range of kinetic energies over each relative periodic orbit attained via time-stepping.
1346
+ The seventh type of bifurcation diagram, where the primary branch lies entirely within
1347
+ the supercritical regime, is not shown but possesses similar features to that seen for
1348
+ Pr = 0.02 in figure 13(f) including stable small-amplitude steady convection states and
1349
+ relative periodic orbits.
1350
+ The three most relevant stable attracting states close to the primary bifurcation at high
1351
+ Pr (Pr > Pr∗ here) are: the conduction state (O), the large-amplitude steady convection
1352
+ states (SOCl) and the travelling wave states (T W). Below the onset of convection
1353
+ (region Oa), all initial conditions decay towards the first of these. In region Ia, above
1354
+ subcritical onset but before the drift instability, initial conditions converge towards SOCl,
1355
+ as evidenced by the energy-time and drift speed-time plot in figure 14(a). Increasing Ra
1356
+ beyond the drift instability into region IIa, SOCl is now unstable and the flow converges
1357
+ towards T W. Figure 14(b) shows that the former state may still be observed in the
1358
+ temporal dynamics as the initial condition first rapidly changes amplitude to approach
1359
+ SOCl before it builds vertical drift and converges to T W.
1360
+ The stable branch of travelling waves destabilises in a supercritical Hopf bifurcation
1361
+ that leads to a stable relative periodic orbit, as shown in figure 13 for Pr = 0.043.
1362
+ Figures 15(a)–(e) depict such an orbit shortly after the bifurcation at Ra = 650 and
1363
+ Pr = 0.043, where we see that the states exhibit small oscillations about a drifting state.
1364
+ The Hopf bifurcation moves towards lower Rayleigh numbers as Pr approaches Pr∗ from
1365
+ above, which reduces the extent over which stable T W are found. This continues until
1366
+ Pr = Pr∗, when stable T W cease to exist and the relative periodic orbit bifurcates
1367
+ directly from the codimension two bifurcation at the saddle-node.
1368
+ Upon further decreasing of the Prandtl number, so that the drift bifurcation occurs
1369
+ on the lower branch of steady convection, the system admits neither stable SOCl nor
1370
+
1371
+ Near-onset dynamics in natural doubly diffusive convection
1372
+ 23
1373
+ (a)
1374
+ (b)
1375
+ (c)
1376
+ (d)
1377
+ (e)
1378
+ (f)
1379
+ Figure 13: Bifurcation diagrams showing the primary branch and other stable attracting
1380
+ states for Le = 11, and (a) Pr = 1, (b) Pr = 0.1, (c) Pr = 0.043, (d) Pr = 0.04,
1381
+ (e) Pr = 0.032 and (f) Pr = 0.02. The solid circles mark the saddle-nodes and open
1382
+ circles indicate where the drift bifurcation occurs. Thick (thin) lines represent states
1383
+ stable (unstable) to the amplitude mode whilst solid (dashed) lines show those stable
1384
+ (unstable) to the drift mode. Thick blue lines indicate the minimal and maximal energies
1385
+ achieved in the stable limit cycle, which starts in a Hopf bifurcation in (c) and in a
1386
+ heteroclinic bifurcation in (d,e,f). The unstable branches of travelling waves are not
1387
+ shown.
1388
+ stable T W. Instead, the bifurcation diagrams are similar to that shown for Pr = 0.04 in
1389
+ figure 13(d), where a branch of unstable T W extends from the drift bifurcation towards
1390
+ higher Rayleigh numbers and stable relative periodic orbits exist after a global bifur-
1391
+ cation, where the stable manifold of SOCl connects heteroclinically with the unstable
1392
+ manifold of the convection state on the lower branch and vice versa.
1393
+ The lack of stability of the nonlinear states before the heteroclinic connection lead
1394
+ all initial conditions to decay down to the conduction state in regions IVa and Va.
1395
+ Figures 14(d) and (f) illustrate this tendency for Pr = 0.032 when Ra = 630 and
1396
+ Ra = 620, respectively. In both cases, the amplitude of the initially imposed roll
1397
+ rapidly decreases to approach that of SOCl rolls. Afterwards, the drift speed of the
1398
+ state increases, as SOCl is unstable to drift, and reaches a maximum around t ≈ 50.
1399
+ The drift speed subsequently decays down to zero, due to the instability of T W, and
1400
+
1401
+ 24
1402
+ C. Beaume, A. M. Rucklidge and J. Tumelty
1403
+ (a)
1404
+ (b)
1405
+ (c)
1406
+ (d)
1407
+ (e)
1408
+ (f)
1409
+ Figure 14: Energy-time (black) and drift speed-time (red) plots illustrating regions I–V in
1410
+ figure 12 with Le = 11. In each case, the initial state was the large-amplitude convection
1411
+ state at Ra = 700 for Pr = 0.1 that was perturbed in the direction of its unstable drift
1412
+ eigenmode. States approached during the trajectory are labelled as follows: (a) region
1413
+ Ia, convergence to SOCl when Pr = 0.1 and Ra = 630; (b) region IIb, convergence to
1414
+ T W when Pr = 0.1 and Ra = 660; (c) region IIIb, convergence to PO when Pr = 0.032
1415
+ and Ra = 660, (d) region IVa, convergence to O when Pr = 0.032 and Ra = 630; (e)
1416
+ region IVc, convergence to SOCs when Pr = 0.02 and Ra = 700; and (f) region Va,
1417
+ convergence to O when Pr = 0.032 and Ra = 620.
1418
+ the time-dependent state converges on the conduction state, which is the only stable
1419
+ attractor in these regions.
1420
+ Beyond the heteroclinic connection, initial conditions tend to converge towards the
1421
+ relative periodic orbit, as they invariably do in region IIIb, where the conduction state
1422
+ is unstable. Figure 14(c) illustrates this convergence starting from a large-amplitude roll
1423
+ with Pr = 0.032 and Ra = 660 perturbed in the direction of its unstable drift eigenmode.
1424
+ A single cycle of this orbit is shown in further detail in figures 15(f)–(j). This relative
1425
+ periodic orbit cycles between the three states: SOCl, T W and a steady small-amplitude
1426
+ convection state, in the following manner. The first stage of the orbit, from 15 ≲ t ≲ 40,
1427
+ resembles the temporal behaviour seen in region IIa (figure 14(b)), where the solution
1428
+ remains close to SOCl in profile (figure 15(h)) while the drift speed slowly increases in
1429
+ magnitude. Following this, between t ≈ 40 and t ≈ 54, the drift speed and kinetic energy
1430
+ rapidly increase as the profile of the state exhibits properties of the travelling wave (T W)
1431
+ solution (figure 15(i)). Between t ≈ 54 and t ≈ 68, both the drift speed and kinetic
1432
+
1433
+ Near-onset dynamics in natural doubly diffusive convection
1434
+ 25
1435
+ (a)
1436
+ (b)
1437
+ (c)
1438
+ (d)
1439
+ (e)
1440
+ (f)
1441
+ (g)
1442
+ (h)
1443
+ (i)
1444
+ (j)
1445
+ Figure 15: Temporal evolution of downward-travelling states across one cycle of two
1446
+ relative periodic orbits at: (a)–(e) Ra = 650 with Pr = 0.043 and Le = 11 and (f)–(j)
1447
+ Ra = 660 with Pr = 0.032 and Le = 11 (as in figure 14(c)). (a) and (f) Anticlockwise
1448
+ trajectory of the periodic orbit in drift speed-energy phase space. Blue dots in (a) mark
1449
+ the conduction and steady convection states. (b) and (g) Energy-time (top) and drift
1450
+ speed-time (bottom) plots. (c)–(e) Streamfunctions of states along the orbit in (a) at (b)
1451
+ t = 0, (c) t = 8 and (d) t = 20 with contour intervals 0.1. (h)–(i) Streamfunctions of
1452
+ states along the orbit in (f) at (h) t = 26, (i) t = 52 and (j) t = 68, with contour intervals
1453
+ 0.05. The streamfunctions have been translated vertically for better visual representation.
1454
+ energy decrease as the state approaches a small-amplitude, non-drifting convection state
1455
+ with inclined rolls (figure 15(j)). The final stage of this orbit is the transition from the
1456
+ small-amplitude back to large-amplitude steady convection, which is indicated by the
1457
+ monotonic increase in kinetic energy while maintaining vd ≈ 0 for t ≳ 70 and t ≲ 15 in
1458
+ figure 15(g).
1459
+ The heteroclinic connection leading to these orbits moves towards higher Rayleigh
1460
+ numbers as Pr decreases and coincides with SN2 for Pr ≲ 0.032 (see figures 13(e)
1461
+ and (f)). This suggests that a saddle-node infinite period (SNIPER) bifurcation explains
1462
+ the origin of the relative periodic orbits at low Prandtl and high Rayleigh numbers.
1463
+ However, by considering various properties of the relative periodic orbits for Pr = 0.032
1464
+ and Le = 11 as Ra approaches RaSN2 from above (figure 16), we additionally find that
1465
+ a gluing bifurcation occurs in the vicinity of the SNIPER bifurcation.
1466
+ At large Rayleigh numbers, a pair of relative periodic orbits with states drifting either
1467
+ upwards or downwards are related by the reflection symmetry. The maximal energy and
1468
+ drift speed attained along these orbits decrease with decreasing Rayleigh number, and the
1469
+ trajectories approach the stable and unstable manifolds of SOCl, as seen in figure 16(a).
1470
+
1471
+ 26
1472
+ C. Beaume, A. M. Rucklidge and J. Tumelty
1473
+ (a)
1474
+ (b)
1475
+ (c)
1476
+ Figure 16: Relative periodic orbits for Le = 11, Pr = 0.032 where RaSN2 ≈ 650.82. (a)
1477
+ Trajectories in (vd, E) phase space for Ra = 650.85 (blue), Ra = 660 (red) and Ra = 700
1478
+ (black). For Ra = 700 and Ra = 660, a pair of relative periodic orbits associated with
1479
+ either negative or positive drift velocity are shown, while for Ra = 650.85, a single
1480
+ periodic orbit with alternating negative and positive drift velocities is shown. (b) Period
1481
+ tP of orbits for selected Ra > RaSN2. The red dashed line shows that approximately
1482
+ tP ∝ (Ra − RaSN2)−0.56. (c) Energy-time plots for Ra = 700 (top), Ra = 660 (middle)
1483
+ and Ra = 650.85 (bottom).
1484
+ This leads to the two relative periodic orbits connecting in a gluing bifurcation around
1485
+ Ra ≈ 652 so that the trajectories become a single periodic orbits where states alternately
1486
+ drift in opposite directions. This is reminiscent of the pulsating waves seen in nonlinear
1487
+ magnetoconvection (Matthews et al. 1993).
1488
+ The resulting single periodic orbit persists until RaSN2, where it terminates in the
1489
+ SNIPER bifurcation. This is evidenced by the period of a single loop of the orbit scaling
1490
+ like tP ∝ (Ra − RaSN2)−0.56 as SN2 is approached, which is close to the expected
1491
+ tP ≈ |Ra − RaSN2|−0.5 scaling. The energy-time plots in figure 16(c) illustrate that
1492
+ the predominant increase in duration occurs near the small-amplitude steady convection
1493
+ state as the orbit approaches the steady state at SN2 in phase space. We also find that
1494
+ the time spent near SOCl increases, whilst the time where the state has large drift speed
1495
+ remains small, implying that the global bifurcation is due to the collision of the periodic
1496
+ orbit with the stable manifold of SOCl.
1497
+ The final attracting state that the flow may converge to is SOCs, as figure 14(e)
1498
+ illustrates for Pr = 0.02 and Ra = 700. This is possible for Pr < Prcusp in the
1499
+ supercritical regions Ob, IVc and Vb, where it is the only stable attracting state, and in
1500
+ the subcritical region IVb, where convergence towards the stable conduction state is also
1501
+ possible.
1502
+ 5. Discussion
1503
+ This paper considers doubly diffusive convection driven by horizontal gradients of
1504
+ temperature and concentration, a configuration typically referred to as natural doubly
1505
+ diffusive convection. We have extended the linear stability analysis of Ghorayeb &
1506
+ Mojtabi (1997) by performing a thorough weakly nonlinear analysis of the system. This
1507
+
1508
+ Near-onset dynamics in natural doubly diffusive convection
1509
+ 27
1510
+ was complemented by a numerical exploration of the nonlinear regime, thereby also
1511
+ extending the analysis of Xin et al. (1998), who focused on Pr = 1 and Le = 1.2.
1512
+ From this analysis, we unravelled the relationships between saddle-nodes, drift and global
1513
+ bifurcations.
1514
+ We have identified regions where the resulting primary branch exhibits qualitatively
1515
+ different behaviour. For large values of the Prandtl number, the bifurcation is subcritical
1516
+ and hysteresis takes place between the conduction state and large-amplitude convection.
1517
+ Whereas, for Prandtl numbers below a critical value, the primary bifurcation is super-
1518
+ critical but this is preceded by the creation of two saddle-nodes without affecting the
1519
+ existence of large-amplitude convection. Despite this, we did not find any hysteresis in
1520
+ the supercritical regime owing to the presence of a destabilising drift bifurcation along
1521
+ the primary branch. The presence of multiple folds along a primary supercritical branch
1522
+ has already been observed in a non-homogeneous fluid system (Erenburg et al. 2003)
1523
+ but we believe that is the first time that it has been observed in homogeneously forced
1524
+ convection in such a small domain.
1525
+ By determining the stability of steady convection states along the primary branch,
1526
+ we identified a codimension two point between a large-amplitude saddle-node and a
1527
+ drift bifurcation. We analysed the dynamics around this codimension two point using
1528
+ its normal form and numerical simulations to investigate new Hopf and heteroclinic
1529
+ bifurcations giving rise to periodic orbits. Such time-dependent states are common
1530
+ features of low Prandtl number doubly diffusive convection (see also Umbr´ıa & Net
1531
+ (2019)). Finally, we provided a classification of the various regions in (Ra, Pr) parameter
1532
+ space according to the nature of their dynamical attractors, for a representative value of
1533
+ the Lewis number.
1534
+ We anticipate that the analysis provided in this paper may serve as a guide for future
1535
+ research in natural doubly diffusive convection by providing a comprehensive map of the
1536
+ near-onset dynamics as a function of the parameter values. Despite our attempt to be
1537
+ thorough, the characterisation of the nonlinear regime at very small Prandtl numbers,
1538
+ which is relevant in astrophysical contexts (see Garaud (2018)), remains to be explored.
1539
+ We observed that this regime behaves differently from extrapolated predictions from O(1)
1540
+ Prandtl numbers but have not pursued this any further.
1541
+ Lastly, the coexistence of steady overturning convection with the stable conduction
1542
+ state when the primary bifurcation is supercritical has important dynamical implications,
1543
+ which will be the subject of future exploration. In particular, it makes this system a
1544
+ candidate for spatially localised pattern formation in a supercritical fluid system, owing
1545
+ to the similarity of the primary branch structure with the Swift–Hohenberg equation
1546
+ considered by Knobloch et al. (2019).
1547
+ Acknowledgements
1548
+ This work was supported by the Leeds–York Natural Environment Research Council
1549
+ (NERC) Doctoral Training Partnership (DTP) SPHERES under grant NE/L002574/1
1550
+ and undertaken on ARC3, part of the High Performance Computing facilities at the
1551
+ University of Leeds, UK.
1552
+ Appendix A. Further expressions for the weakly nonlinear analysis
1553
+ A.1. Second-order corrections
1554
+ The solution to the system at O(ǫ2) (3.14) given in (3.26) involves parameter-free
1555
+ functions ˜ui, ˜wi, ˜pi and ˜θi for i = 2, ..., 7 within the expressions for Ψ 0
1556
+ 2 , Ψ 1
1557
+ 2 and Ψ 2
1558
+ 2
1559
+
1560
+ 28
1561
+ C. Beaume, A. M. Rucklidge and J. Tumelty
1562
+ (3.27–3.29). These functions satisfy the forced linear equations:
1563
+
1564
+
1565
+
1566
+
1567
+ −D
1568
+ 0
1569
+ 0
1570
+ 0
1571
+ 0
1572
+ D2
1573
+ 0
1574
+ 0
1575
+ 0
1576
+ 0
1577
+ D2
1578
+ Rac(1 − Le)
1579
+ 0
1580
+ 0
1581
+ 0
1582
+ D2
1583
+
1584
+
1585
+
1586
+
1587
+
1588
+
1589
+
1590
+
1591
+ ˜p2
1592
+ ˜w2
1593
+ ˜w3
1594
+ ˜θ3
1595
+
1596
+
1597
+
1598
+  =
1599
+
1600
+
1601
+
1602
+
1603
+ f10
1604
+ f20
1605
+ 0
1606
+ f40
1607
+
1608
+
1609
+
1610
+  ,
1611
+ (A 1)
1612
+
1613
+
1614
+
1615
+
1616
+ D2 − 4k2
1617
+ c
1618
+ 0
1619
+ −D
1620
+ 0
1621
+ 0
1622
+ D2 − 4k2
1623
+ c
1624
+ −2ikc
1625
+ Rac(1 − Le)
1626
+ D
1627
+ 2ikc
1628
+ 0
1629
+ 0
1630
+ −1
1631
+ 0
1632
+ 0
1633
+ D2 − 4k2
1634
+ c
1635
+
1636
+
1637
+
1638
+
1639
+
1640
+
1641
+
1642
+
1643
+ ˜u4
1644
+ ˜w4
1645
+ ˜p4
1646
+ ˜θ4
1647
+
1648
+ ��
1649
+
1650
+  =
1651
+
1652
+
1653
+
1654
+
1655
+ f12
1656
+ f22
1657
+ 0
1658
+ 0
1659
+
1660
+
1661
+
1662
+  ,
1663
+ (A 2)
1664
+
1665
+
1666
+
1667
+
1668
+
1669
+
1670
+ D2 − 4k2
1671
+ c
1672
+ 0
1673
+ −D
1674
+ 0
1675
+ 0
1676
+ 0
1677
+ D2 − 4k2
1678
+ c
1679
+ −2ikc
1680
+ Rac(1 − Le)
1681
+ 0
1682
+ D
1683
+ 2ikc
1684
+ 0
1685
+ 0
1686
+ 0
1687
+ −1
1688
+ 0
1689
+ 0
1690
+ D2 − 4k2
1691
+ c
1692
+ 0
1693
+ −1
1694
+ 0
1695
+ 0
1696
+ 0
1697
+ D2 − 4k2
1698
+ c
1699
+
1700
+
1701
+
1702
+
1703
+
1704
+
1705
+
1706
+
1707
+
1708
+
1709
+
1710
+
1711
+ ˜u5
1712
+ ˜w5
1713
+ ˜p5
1714
+ ˜θ5
1715
+ ˜θ6
1716
+
1717
+
1718
+
1719
+
1720
+
1721
+
1722
+ =
1723
+
1724
+
1725
+
1726
+
1727
+
1728
+
1729
+ 0
1730
+ 0
1731
+ 0
1732
+ f42
1733
+ 0
1734
+
1735
+
1736
+
1737
+
1738
+
1739
+
1740
+ ,
1741
+ (A 3)
1742
+
1743
+
1744
+
1745
+
1746
+ D2 − k2
1747
+ c
1748
+ 0
1749
+ −D
1750
+ 0
1751
+ 0
1752
+ D2 − k2
1753
+ c
1754
+ −ikc
1755
+ Rac(1 − Le)
1756
+ D
1757
+ ikc
1758
+ 0
1759
+ 0
1760
+ −1
1761
+ 0
1762
+ 0
1763
+ D2 − k2
1764
+ c
1765
+
1766
+
1767
+
1768
+
1769
+
1770
+
1771
+
1772
+
1773
+ ˜u7
1774
+ ˜w7
1775
+ ˜p7
1776
+ ˜θ7
1777
+
1778
+
1779
+
1780
+  =
1781
+
1782
+
1783
+
1784
+
1785
+ f11
1786
+ f21
1787
+ f31
1788
+ f41
1789
+
1790
+
1791
+
1792
+  ,
1793
+ (A 4)
1794
+ where D =
1795
+ d
1796
+ dx, and ˜ui, ˜wi and ˜θi satisfy homogeneous boundary conditions and the
1797
+ pressure boundary conditions come from a projection of the Navier–Stokes equation
1798
+ onto the side walls:
1799
+ ˜ui = 0,
1800
+ ˜wi = 0,
1801
+ −∂˜pi
1802
+ ∂x + ∂2˜ui
1803
+ ∂x2 = 0
1804
+ ˜θi = 0
1805
+ on
1806
+ x = 0, 1
1807
+ (A 5)
1808
+ A.2. Coefficients in the Ginzburg–Landau equation
1809
+ Expressions for the coefficients α, β, γ and δ in the Ginzburg–Landau equation (3.33)
1810
+ are obtained by evaluating:
1811
+ α = 1
1812
+ Pr
1813
+
1814
+ ⟨U † , U1⟩ + ⟨W † , W1⟩
1815
+
1816
+ + (1 + Le)⟨Θ† , Θ1⟩
1817
+ = 1
1818
+ Prα1 + (1 + Le)α2,
1819
+ (A 6)
1820
+ β = −
1821
+ � 1
1822
+ Pr ⟨U † , N U
1823
+ 3 ⟩ + 1
1824
+ Pr⟨W † , N W
1825
+ 3 ⟩ +
1826
+ 1
1827
+ 1 − Le⟨Θ† , N Θ
1828
+ 3 − LeN Φ
1829
+ 3 ⟩
1830
+
1831
+ =
1832
+ 1
1833
+ Pr2 β1 + 1 + Le
1834
+ Pr
1835
+ β2 + (1 + Le2)β3 + Leβ4,
1836
+ (A 7)
1837
+ γ = (1 − Le)⟨W †, Θ1⟩
1838
+ = (1 − Le)γ1,
1839
+ (A 8)
1840
+ δ = ⟨U † , U1⟩ + ⟨W † , W1⟩ + ⟨Θ† , Θ1⟩
1841
+ + 2ikc
1842
+
1843
+ ⟨U † , ˜u7⟩ + ⟨W † , ˜w7⟩ + ⟨Θ† , ˜θ7⟩
1844
+
1845
+ + ⟨P † , ˜w7⟩ − ⟨W † , ˜p7⟩,
1846
+ (A 9)
1847
+
1848
+ Near-onset dynamics in natural doubly diffusive convection
1849
+ 29
1850
+ α1
1851
+ 1.11 × 10−4
1852
+ β2 −1.63 × 10−8
1853
+ (Le > 1) γ1 −8.85 × 10−7
1854
+ α2
1855
+ 2.27 × 10−4
1856
+ β3
1857
+ 7.47 × 10−8
1858
+ (Le < 1) γ1
1859
+ 8.85 × 10−7
1860
+ β1 −4.43 × 10−9
1861
+ β4
1862
+ 1.58 × 10−7
1863
+ δ
1864
+ 7.38 × 10−4
1865
+ Table 4: Numerical values of the coefficients α1, α2, β1, β2, β3, β4, γ1 and δ in (3.33).
1866
+ The sign of γ1 depends upon whether Le > 1 or Le < 1 as γ > 0 for all Le, while all
1867
+ other coefficients are independent of the parameters Le and Pr.
1868
+ where the nonlinear functions N F
1869
+ 3 , for F = U, W, Θ, Φ, and coefficients βi for i = 1, 2, 3, 4
1870
+ are:
1871
+ N F
1872
+ 3 = U1
1873
+ dF 0
1874
+ 2
1875
+ dx + U1
1876
+ dF 2
1877
+ 2
1878
+ dx + U 2
1879
+ 2
1880
+ dF 1
1881
+ dx + 2ikcW 1F 2
1882
+ 2 + ikcW 0
1883
+ 2 F1 − ikcW 2
1884
+ 2 F 1,
1885
+ (A 10)
1886
+ β1 = −
1887
+
1888
+ U †, U 1
1889
+ d˜u4
1890
+ dx + ˜u4
1891
+ dU 1
1892
+ dx + 2ikc˜u4W 1 + ikc ˜w2U1 − ikc ˜w4U 1
1893
+
1894
+
1895
+
1896
+ W †, U1
1897
+ d ˜w2
1898
+ dx + U1
1899
+ d ˜w4
1900
+ dx + ˜u4
1901
+ dW 1
1902
+ dx
1903
+ + ikcW 1 ˜w4 + ikcW1 ˜w2
1904
+
1905
+ ,
1906
+ (A 11)
1907
+ β2 = −
1908
+
1909
+ U †, U 1
1910
+ d˜u5
1911
+ dx + ˜u5
1912
+ dU 1
1913
+ dx + 2ikc˜u5W 1 + ikc ˜w3U1 − ikc ˜w5U 1
1914
+
1915
+
1916
+
1917
+ W †, U1
1918
+ d ˜w3
1919
+ dx + U1
1920
+ d ˜w5
1921
+ dx + ˜u5
1922
+ dW 1
1923
+ dx
1924
+ + ikcW 1 ˜w5 + ikcW1 ˜w3
1925
+
1926
+
1927
+
1928
+ Θ†, U1
1929
+ d˜θ4
1930
+ dx + ˜u4
1931
+ dΘ1
1932
+ dx + 2ikcW 1˜θ4 + ikc ˜w2Θ1 − ikc ˜w4Θ1
1933
+
1934
+ ,
1935
+ (A 12)
1936
+ β3 = −
1937
+
1938
+ Θ†, U1
1939
+ d˜θ3
1940
+ dx + U 1
1941
+ d˜θ5
1942
+ dx + ˜u5
1943
+ dΘ1
1944
+ dx + 2ikcW 1˜θ5 + ikc ˜w3Θ1 − ikc ˜w5Θ1
1945
+
1946
+ , (A 13)
1947
+ β4 = −
1948
+
1949
+ Θ†, U1
1950
+ d˜θ3
1951
+ dx + U 1
1952
+
1953
+ d˜θ5
1954
+ dx + d˜θ6
1955
+ dx
1956
+
1957
+ + 2˜u5
1958
+ dΘ1
1959
+ dx
1960
+ +2ikc
1961
+
1962
+ W 1
1963
+
1964
+ ˜θ5 + ˜θ6
1965
+
1966
+ + ˜w3Θ1 − ˜w5Θ1
1967
+ ��
1968
+ .
1969
+ (A 14)
1970
+ These expressions for the parameter-free coefficients αi, βi, γ1 and δ are evaluated
1971
+ numerically and are given in table 4.
1972
+ Of particular interest is the boundary where the primary bifurcation changes from
1973
+ subcritical to supercritical. This occurs when β = 0, which we may find explicitly by
1974
+ taking the positive root of equation (A 7), to find:
1975
+ Prc = −(1 + Le)β2 +
1976
+
1977
+ (1 + Le)2β2
1978
+ 2 − 4β1 [(1 + Le2)β3 + Leβ4]
1979
+ 2[(1 + Le2)β3 + Leβ4]
1980
+ .
1981
+ (A 15)
1982
+ A.3. Effect of thermal and solution advective terms on a2
1983
+ To determine the contributions that each of the nonlinear terms make to a2, we
1984
+ introduce the factors ζ1 and ζ2 that multiply the thermal and solutal advective terms,
1985
+ respectively. We numerically perform the weakly nonlinear analysis for the modified
1986
+
1987
+ 30
1988
+ C. Beaume, A. M. Rucklidge and J. Tumelty
1989
+ 0.0001
1990
+ 0.01
1991
+ 1
1992
+ 100
1993
+ 10000
1994
+ 0
1995
+ (a)
1996
+ 0.0001
1997
+ 0.01
1998
+ 1
1999
+ 100
2000
+ 10000
2001
+ 0
2002
+ (b)
2003
+ Figure 17: Contours of the coefficient a2 as a function of ζ1 and ζ2, which respectively
2004
+ multiply thermal and solutal advective nonlinearities in (A 16–A19), for (a) Le = 11,
2005
+ Pr = 1 and (b) Le = 1/11, Pr = 1. The contour a2 = 0, which marks the boundary
2006
+ between subcriticality and supercriticality, is shown in bold.
2007
+ system:
2008
+ 1
2009
+ Pr
2010
+ �∂u
2011
+ ∂t + u · ∇u
2012
+
2013
+ = −∇p + ∇2u + Ra(T − C)ˆz,
2014
+ (A 16)
2015
+ ∇ · u = 0,
2016
+ (A 17)
2017
+ ∂T
2018
+ ∂t + ζ1u · ∇T = ∇2T,
2019
+ (A 18)
2020
+ ∂C
2021
+ ∂t + ζ2u · ∇C = 1
2022
+ Le∇2C,
2023
+ (A 19)
2024
+ with ζ1, ζ2 ∈ [10−2, 104] and selected values of the Prandtl and Lewis numbers. The
2025
+ coefficient a2 tends to increase when one of ζ1 or ζ2 increases, while keeping the other
2026
+ fixed, as indicated by the contours in figure 17. Thus, temperature and solutal advection
2027
+ enhances the subcriticality of the primary bifurcation.
2028
+ REFERENCES
2029
+ Batiste, O., Knobloch, E., Mercader, I. & Net, M. 2001 Simulations of oscillatory binary
2030
+ fluid convection in large aspect ratio containers. Phys. Rev. E 65, 016303.
2031
+ Beaume, C. 2017 Adaptive Stokes preconditioning for steady incompressible flows. Commun.
2032
+ Comput. Phys. 22 (2), 494–516.
2033
+ Beaume, C. 2020 Transition to doubly diffusive chaos. Phys. Rev. Fluids 5 (10), 103903.
2034
+ Beaume, C., Bergeon, A. & Knobloch, E. 2011 Homoclinic snaking of localized states in
2035
+ doubly diffusive convection. Phys. Fluids 23, 094102.
2036
+ Beaume, C., Bergeon, A. & Knobloch, E. 2013a Convectons and secondary snaking in
2037
+ three-dimensional natural doubly diffusive convection. Phys. Fluids 25 (2), 024105.
2038
+ Beaume, C., Bergeon, A. & Knobloch, E. 2013b Nonsnaking doubly diffusive convectons
2039
+ and the twist instability. Phys. Fluids 25, 114102.
2040
+ Beaume, C., Bergeon, A. & Knobloch, E. 2018 Three-dimensional doubly diffusive
2041
+ convectons: instability and transition to complex dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 840, 74–105.
2042
+ Bergeon, A., Ghorayeb, K. & Mojtabi, A. 1999 Double diffusive convection in an inclined
2043
+ cavity. Phys. Fluids 11, 549–559.
2044
+
2045
+ Near-onset dynamics in natural doubly diffusive convection
2046
+ 31
2047
+ Bergeon, A. & Knobloch, E. 2002 Natural doubly diffusive convection in three-dimensional
2048
+ enclosures. Phys. Fluids 14 (9), 3233–3250.
2049
+ Bergeon, A. & Knobloch, E. 2008a Periodic and localized states in natural doubly diffusive
2050
+ convection. Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom. 237 (8), 1139–1150.
2051
+ Bergeon, A. & Knobloch, E. 2008b Spatially localized states in natural doubly diffusive
2052
+ convection. Phys. Fluids 20 (3), 034102.
2053
+ Bethe, H. A. 1990 Supernova mechanisms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 801–866.
2054
+ Clever, R. M. & Busse, F. H. 1981 Low-Prandtl-number convection in a layer heated from
2055
+ below. J. Fluid Mech. 102, 61–74.
2056
+ Cross, M. C., Daniels, P. G., Hohenberg, P. C. & Siggia, E. D. 1983 Phase-winding
2057
+ solutions in a finite container above the convective threshold. J. Fluid Mech. 127, 155–
2058
+ 183.
2059
+ Deane, A. E., Knobloch, E. & Toomre, J. 1988 Traveling waves in large-aspect-ratio
2060
+ thermosolutal convection. Phys. Rev. A 37, 1817–1820.
2061
+ Dijkstra, H. A. & Kranenborg, E. J. 1996 A bifurcation study of double diffusive flows in a
2062
+ laterally heated stably stratified liquid layer. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 39 (13), 2699–2710.
2063
+ Erenburg, V., Gelfgat, A. Y., Kit, E., Bar-Yoseph, P. Z. & Solan, A. 2003 Multiple
2064
+ states, stability and bifurcations of natural convection in a rectangular cavity with
2065
+ partially heated vertical walls. J. Fluid Mech. 492, 63–89.
2066
+ Garaud, P. 2018 Double-diffusive convection at low Prandtl number. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
2067
+ 50, 50.
2068
+ Ghorayeb, K. & Mojtabi, A. 1997 Double diffusive convection in a vertical rectangular cavity.
2069
+ Phys. Fluids 9 (8), 2339–2348.
2070
+ Guckenheimer, J. & Holmes, P. 1983 Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems and
2071
+ Bifurcations of Vector Fields. New York: Springer.
2072
+ Huppert, H. E. & Sparks, R. S. J. 1984 Double diffusive convection due to crystallization in
2073
+ magmas. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet Sci. 12, 11–37.
2074
+ Huppert, H. E. & Turner, J. S. 1981 Double-diffusive convection. J. Fluid Mech. 106, 299–
2075
+ 329.
2076
+ Karniadakis, G. E., Israeli, M. & Orszag, S. A. 1991 High-order splitting methods for the
2077
+ incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys. 97 (2), 414–443.
2078
+ Kelley, D. E., Fernando, H. J. S., Gargett, A. E., Tanny, J. & ¨Ozsoy, E. 2003 The
2079
+ diffusive regime of double diffusive convection. Prog. Oceanogr. 56, 461–481.
2080
+ Knobloch, E. 2015 Spatial localization in dissipative systems. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter
2081
+ Phys. 6, 325–359.
2082
+ Knobloch, E., Moore, D. R., Toomre, J. & Weiss., N. O. 1986 Transitions to chaos in
2083
+ two-dimensional double-diffusive convection. J. Fluid Mech. 166, 409–448.
2084
+ Knobloch, E., Uecker, H. & Wetzel, D. 2019 Defectlike structures and localized patterns
2085
+ in the cubic-quintic-septic Swift–Hohenberg equation. Phys. Rev. E 100 (1), 012204.
2086
+ Kolodner, P. 1991 Stable and unstable pulses of traveling-wave convection. Phys. Rev. A 43,
2087
+ 2827–2832.
2088
+ Krishnamurti, R. 2003 Double-diffusive transport in laboratory thermohaline staircases. J.
2089
+ Fluid Mech. 483, 287–314.
2090
+ Krishnamurti, R. 2009 Heat, salt and momentum transport in a laboratory thermohaline
2091
+ staircase. J. Fluid Mech. 638, 491–506.
2092
+ Lay, T., Hernlund, J. & Buffett, B. A. 2008 Core–mantle boundary heat flow. Nat. Geosci.
2093
+ 1, 25.
2094
+ Mamou, M., Vasseur, P. & Bilgen, E. 1998 Double-diffusive convection instability in a
2095
+ vertical porous enclosure. J. Fluid Mech. 368, 263–289.
2096
+ Mamun, C. K. & Tuckerman, L. S. 1995 Asymmetry and Hopf bifurcation in spherical
2097
+ Couette flow. Phys. Fluids 7 (1), 80–91.
2098
+ Matthews, P. C., Proctor, M. R. E., Rucklidge, A. M. & Weiss, N. O. 1993 Pulsating
2099
+ waves in nonlinear magnetoconvection. Phys. Lett. A 183 (1), 69–75.
2100
+ Mercader, I., Batiste, O., Alonso, A. & Knobloch, E. 2009 Localized pinning states in
2101
+ closed containers: homoclinic snaking without bistability. Phys. Rev. E 80, 025201.
2102
+
2103
+ 32
2104
+ C. Beaume, A. M. Rucklidge and J. Tumelty
2105
+ Mercader, I., Batiste, O., Alonso, A. & Knobloch, E. 2011 Convectons, anticonvectons
2106
+ and multiconvectons in binary fluid convection. J. Fluid Mech. 667, 586–606.
2107
+ Paliwal, R. C. & Chen, C. F. 1980a Double-diffusive instability in an inclined fluid layer.
2108
+ part 1. experimental investigation. J. Fluid Mech. 98, 755–768.
2109
+ Paliwal, R. C. & Chen, C. F. 1980b Double-diffusive instability in an inclined fluid layer.
2110
+ part 2. stability analysis. J. Fluid Mech. 98, 769–785.
2111
+ P´erez-Santos, I., Garc´es-Vargas, J., Schneider, W., Ross, L., Parra, S. & Valle-
2112
+ Levinson, A. 2014 Double-diffusive layering and mixing in patagonian fjords. Prog.
2113
+ Oceanogr. 129, 35–49.
2114
+ Predtechensky, A. A., McCormich, W. D., Swift, J. B., Noszticzius, Z. & Swinney,
2115
+ H. L. 1994 Onset of traveling waves in isothermal double diffusive convection. Phys. Rev.
2116
+ Lett. 72, 218–221.
2117
+ Requil´e, Y., Hirata, S. C., Ouarzazi, M. N. & Barletta, A. 2020 Weakly nonlinear
2118
+ analysis of viscous dissipation thermal instability in plane Poiseuille and plane Couette
2119
+ flows. J. Fluid Mech. 886.
2120
+ Rucklidge, A. M. 1992 Chaos in models of double convection. J. Fluid Mech. 237, 209–229.
2121
+ Schmitt, R. W. 1983 The characteristics of salt fingers in a variety of fluid systems, including
2122
+ stellar interiors, liquid metals, oceans, and magmas. Phys. Fluids 26 (9), 2373–2377.
2123
+ Schmitt, R. W. 1994 Double diffusion in oceanography. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 26, 255–285.
2124
+ Schmitt, R. W., Ledwell, J. R., Montgomery, E. T., Polzin, K. L. & Toole, J. M.
2125
+ 2005 Enhanced diapycnal mixing by salt fingers in the thermocline of the tropical Atlantic.
2126
+ Science 308 (5722), 685–688.
2127
+ Schmitt, R. W., Perkins, H., Boyd, J. D. & Stalcup, M. C. 1987 C-SALT: An investigation
2128
+ of the thermohaline staircase in the western tropical North Atlantic. Deep-Sea Res.
2129
+ 34 (10), 1655–1665.
2130
+ Shankar, B. M., Kumar, J. & Shivakumara, I. S. 2021 Stability of double-diffusive natural
2131
+ convection in a vertical fluid layer. Phys. Fluids 33 (9), 094113.
2132
+ Spiegel, E. A. 1969 Semiconvection. Comments on Astrophysics and Space Physics pp. 1–57.
2133
+ Spiegel, E. A. 1972 Convection in stars ii. special effects. Annu. Rev. of Astron. Astrophys.
2134
+ 10, 261–304.
2135
+ Spina, A., Toomre, J. & Knobloch,
2136
+ E. 1998 Confined states in large-aspect-ratio
2137
+ thermosolutal convection. Phys. Rev. E 57, 524–547.
2138
+ Tsitverblit, N. 1995 Bifurcation phenomena in confined thermosolutal convection with lateral
2139
+ heating: Commencement of the double-diffusive region. Phys. Fluids 7 (4), 718–736.
2140
+ Tsitverblit, N. & Kit, E. 1993 The multiplicity of steady flows in confined double-diffusive
2141
+ convection with lateral heating. Phys. Fluids A 5 (4), 1062–1064.
2142
+ Umbr´ıa, J. S. & Net, M. 2019 Stationary Flows and Periodic Dynamics of Binary Mixtures in
2143
+ Tall Laterally Heated Slots. In Computational Modelling of Bifurcations and Instabilities
2144
+ in Fluid Dynamics, pp. 171–216. Springer.
2145
+ Watanabe, T., Iima, M. & Nishiura, Y. 2012 Spontaneous formation of travelling localized
2146
+ structures and their asymptotic behaviour in binary fluid convection. J. Fluid Mech. 712,
2147
+ 219–243.
2148
+ Watanabe, T., Iima, M. & Nishiura, Y. 2016 A skeleton of collision dynamics: hierarchical
2149
+ network structure among even-symmetric steady pulses in binary fluid convection. SIAM
2150
+ J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 15, 789–806.
2151
+ Wilcox, W. R. 1993 Transport phenomena in crystal growth from solution. Prog. Cryst. Growth
2152
+ Charact. Mater. 26, 153–194.
2153
+ Xin, S., Le Qu´er´e, P. & Tuckerman, L. S. 1998 Bifurcation analysis of double-diffusive
2154
+ convection with opposing horizontal thermal and solutal gradients. Phys. Fluids 10 (4),
2155
+ 850–858.
2156
+ You, Y. 2002 A global ocean climatological atlas of the turner angle: Implications for double-
2157
+ diffusion and water-mass structure. Deep-Sea Res. 49, 2075–2093.
2158
+
ItFAT4oBgHgl3EQfux4k/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
MNAzT4oBgHgl3EQfkf3z/content/tmp_files/2301.01534v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,2225 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ arXiv:2301.01534v1 [astro-ph.SR] 4 Jan 2023
2
+ Draft version January 5, 2023
3
+ Typeset using LATEX default style in AASTeX631
4
+ Origin of Quasi-Periodic Pulsation at the Base of Kink Unstable Jet
5
+ Sudheer K. Mishra,1 Kartika Sangal,2 Pradeep Kayshap,3 Petr Jel´ınek,4 A.K. Srivastava,2 and S.P. Rajaguru1
6
+ 1Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Koramangala, Bangalore-560034, India.
7
+ 2Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi-221005, India
8
+ 3VIT Bhopal, Kothari Kalan, Sehore, Madhya-Pradesh 466114, India
9
+ 4University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, Department of Physics
10
+ Braniˇsovsk´a 1760, CZ – 370 05 ˇCesk´e Budˇejovice, Czech Republic
11
+ ABSTRACT
12
+ We study a blowout jet that occurs at the west limb of the Sun on August 29th, 2014 using high-resolution
13
+ 1
14
+ imaging/spectroscopic observations provided by SDO/AIA and IRIS. An inverse γ-shape flux-rope appears
15
+ 2
16
+ before the jet– morphological indication of the onset of kink instability. The twisted field lines of kink-unstable
17
+ 3
18
+ flux-rope reconnect at its bright knot and launch the blowout jet at ≈06:30:43 UT with an average speed of
19
+ 4
20
+ 234 km s−1. Just after the launch, the northern leg of the flux rope erupts completely. The time-distance
21
+ 5
22
+ diagrams show multiple spikes or bright dots, which is the result of periodic fluctuations, i.e., quasi-periodic
23
+ 6
24
+ fluctuations (QPPs). The wavelet analysis confirms that QPPs have a dominant period of ≈ 03 minutes. IRIS
25
+ 7
26
+ spectra (Si iv, C ii, and Mg ii) may also indicate the occurrence of magnetic reconnection through existence
27
+ 8
28
+ of broad & complex profiles and bi-directional flows in the jet. Further, we have found that line broadening
29
+ 9
30
+ is periodic with a period of ≈ 03 minutes, and plasma upflow is always occurs when the line width is high,
31
+ 10
32
+ i.e., multiple reconnection may produce periodic line broadening. The EM curves also show the same period
33
+ 11
34
+ of ≈ 03 minutes in different temperature bins. The images and EM show that this jet’s spire is mainly cool
35
+ 12
36
+ (chromospheric/transition region) rather than hot (coronal) material. Further, line broadening, intensity, and
37
+ 13
38
+ EM curves have a period of ≈03 minutes, which strongly supports that multiple magnetic reconnection triggers
39
+ 14
40
+ QPPs in the blowout jet.
41
+ 15
42
+ Keywords: Blowout jet, Instability, Magnetic Reconnection, Magnetic; Magnetic fields, Corona
43
+ 1. INTRODUCTION
44
+ Solar jets are an integral part of the solar atmosphere, and they are an important feature of the mass/energy cycle within the
45
+ solar atmosphere. Solar jets occur everywhere in the solar atmosphere. The solar jets have been classified into different categories
46
+ based on different criteria, namely, (1) based on morphology–standard jets & blowout jets (Moore et al. 2010, 2013), (2) based
47
+ on the region of solar atmosphere where they occur– active-region jets, coronal hole jets, quiet-Sun jets, network jets, umbral
48
+ jets, penumbral jets, and polar jets (Srivastava & Murawski 2011; Kayshap et al. 2013, 2018; Tian et al. 2014; Tiwari et al. 2016;
49
+ Mulay et al. 2017; Srivastava et al. 2018), and (3) based on the filter in which they observed–e.g., H-α jet, extreme ultraviolet
50
+ (EUV) jets, ultraviolet jet (UV) jets, X-ray jets, and radio jets (e.g., Shibata et al. 1992; Innes et al. 1997; Shibata et al. 2007;
51
+ Sterling et al. 2015; Filippov et al. 2015; Shen et al. 2017; Zhang & Ji 2014; Ni et al. 2017; Zhang & Ni 2019). Solar surges are
52
+ another category of solar jet-like features, and they are made of mainly cool plasma. Therefore, cool lines/filters (e.g., Hα, Ca ii
53
+ H & K line, Mg ii h & k lines, Si iv, IRIS/SJI 1400 Å, AIA 304 Å, and many more) use to observe the solar surges (e.g., Sterling
54
+ 2000; Tziotziou et al. 2005; Kayshap et al. 2021). However, the surges can heat the plasma up to transition region/coronal tem-
55
+ perature and then rapidly cools down to chromospheric temperatures (N´obrega-Siverio et al. 2016, 2017, 2018; De Pontieu et al.
56
+ 2021). In addition, Young (2015) have added one more category to the solar jets, i.e., dark jets– no intensity enhancement, but
57
+ Corresponding author: Pradeep Kayshap
58
59
+
60
+ 2
61
+ Mishra et al.
62
+ the signature exists in the Doppler velocity.
63
+ The energy required to power the solar jets comes from the complex magnetic field through the most widely occurring
64
+ process (i.e., magnetic reconnection) in the solar atmosphere. These solar jets are distributed all over the solar atmosphere
65
+ as magnetic reconnection can occur anywhere within the solar atmosphere when suitable physical conditions are pronounced.
66
+ Widely, the bipolar magnetic field reconnects with the pre-existing magnetic field, and produces the jets in the solar atmo-
67
+ sphere (e.g., Yokoyama & Shibata 1995, 1996; Shimojo et al. 1996; Shibata et al. 2007; Nishizuka et al. 2008; Raouafi et al.
68
+ 2016). Moreno-Insertis & Galsgaard (2013) have performed a detailed numerical simulation, based on the magnetic reconnec-
69
+ tion between an emerging bipolar magnetic field with the pre-existing open coronal magnetic field, to understand the triggering
70
+ mechanisms and dynamics of solar jets. Further, in another remarkable work, Sterling et al. (2015) have shown that mini-filament
71
+ can also trigger the solar jets, i.e., the eruption of the mini-filament trigger the magnetic reconnection which ultimately produces
72
+ the solar jet. In this continuation, Wyper et al. (2017) has proposed the universal magnetic breakout model to trigger the jet,
73
+ i.e., magnetic reconnection takes place due to the mini-filament eruption. However, it must be noted that this magnetic breakout
74
+ model was already known & widely used in the triggering of the large-scale eruptions, and Wyper et al. (2018) have extended
75
+ this model to the formation of solar jets. As per the magnetic breakout model, the magnetic reconnection takes place due to the
76
+ mini-filament eruption, and it finally triggers the jet in the solar atmosphere. Hence, we can say that magnetic reconnection is an
77
+ integral process of the formation of solar jets.
78
+ There are at least three different theoretical explanations for plasma acceleration from various numerical simulations. In the first
79
+ type of acceleration mechanisms, the plasma is accelerated from the magnetic reconnection site by the slingshot effect along the
80
+ newly reconnected magnetic field lines (Yokoyama & Shibata 1996; Nishizuka et al. 2008; Moreno-Insertis et al. 2008). The re-
81
+ leased energy from the magnetic reconnection can be deposited through various ways, e.g., adiabatic compression, Joule heating,
82
+ accelerated particles, and shocks. Hence, this released energy from the magnetic reconnection can heat the plasma impulsively,
83
+ and the strong pressure and temperature gradient will develop there that can induce the evaporation flows (Shimojo et al. 2001;
84
+ Miyagoshi & Yokoyama 2003; Matsui et al. 2012). The evaporation flows is the second plasma acceleration mechanism for the
85
+ solar jets, and it is induced by the magnetic reconnection. The speed in this mechanism (i.e., evaporation flow) of the jet plasma
86
+ is much slower than the speed of plasma attained through the slingshot effect. When the twisted closed magnetic field lines
87
+ reconnect with the untwisted open field lines then the twist will transfer to the newly reconnected magnetic field lines. And,
88
+ the newly reconnected magnetic field lines will exhibit untwisting motions, which is the third type of acceleration mechanism
89
+ induced by the magnetic reconnection. The models, which are based on this mechanism, are known as the untwisting models
90
+ of the solar jets (e.g., Shibata & Uchida 1986; Schmieder et al. 1995; Canfield et al. 1996; Jibben & Canfield 2004; Kamio et al.
91
+ 2010; Archontis & Hood 2013; Moreno-Insertis & Galsgaard 2013; Fang et al. 2014). The helical/rotational motions (i.e., an
92
+ important feature of the solar jets) can be explained through these untwisting models of the solar jets. In addition, it can be noted
93
+ that the helical/rotational motion is a main feature of cool emissions of the solar jets (e.g., Canfield et al. 1996; Harrison et al.
94
+ 2001; Kamio et al. 2010; Hong et al. 2013). The blowout jet mainly emits at cooler temperature, and they always exhibit a strong
95
+ rotation (e.g., Sterling et al. 2010; Moore et al. 2013).
96
+ The physical process used in the untwisting models (i.e., reconnection between the twisted magnetic field and open magnetic
97
+ field lines) is not the only way to trigger the solar jets and their helical or rotating motions. Various types of magnetohydrody-
98
+ namic (MHD) instabilities (e.g., Rayleigh-Taylor (RT), Kelvin-Helmholtz (KH), Ballooning mode, convective-driven instability,
99
+ radiatively-driven instability, heating-driven thermal instabilities, tearing mode, kink mode, sausage mode, helical/torsional
100
+ mode, and current-sheet mode) are important physical process trigger the wide varieties of the solar phenomena, i.e., from the
101
+ small-scale event (e.g., solar jets) to large-scale eruptions (Mishra et al. 2018; Mishra & Srivastava 2019; Mishra et al. 2021).
102
+ Kink instability is one of the prominent mechanisms to trigger the solar jets (see review; Raouafi et al. 2016). The observational
103
+ and theoretical studies suggest that the rotational/twisting motions of the solar jets are directly linked with the helical kink
104
+ instability (Shibata & Uchida 1986; Pariat et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2019; Zaqarashvili et al. 2021).
105
+ The embedded magnetic dipole is key feature of the numerical simulations based on the kink-instability. Generally, the MHD
106
+ instabilities are associated with the embedded magnetic bipole in such numerical simulations, and the kink instability takes place
107
+ when threshold in energy or helicity or twist exceeds some critical values (e.g., Pariat et al. 2009). The kink instability may
108
+ evolve in a flux rope if the azimuthal component of the magnetic field exceeds some critical threshold (Aschwanden 2004).
109
+ The theoretical and observational studies suggest different threshold values of twist/helicity for the kink instability, namely,
110
+
111
+ QPP in Kink Unstable Jet
112
+ 3
113
+ 2π (Kruskal & Kulsrud 1958), 2.5π (Hood & Priest (1981)), 2.6π (e.g., Pariat et al. 2009, 2015),and 1.3 turns (Liu et al. 2019).
114
+ Hence, we can say that the threshold value of twist to trigger kink-instability varies a lot, and it depends on the magnetic field
115
+ conditions. Now, this kink instability forces a loss of the stability of the whole stable magnetic field configuration (i.e., the
116
+ embedded magnetic flux in the uniform magnetic field; Pariat et al. 2009), and it leads to the magnetic reconnection that drives
117
+ the helical solar jets (Pariat et al. 2015). However, such magnetic field configuration is not the only possibility for helical jets.
118
+ The high-resolution observations have shown the existence of twisted flux rope, and the reconnection within the twisted magnetic
119
+ structure can also produce such helical jets (Raouafi et al. 2010; Liu et al. 2011; Kayshap et al. 2013).
120
+ The solar jets may also be the source of MHD waves (Cirtain et al. 2007; Zhelyazkov 2012) and quasi-periodic pulsations (e.g.,
121
+ Morton et al. 2012; Zhang & Ji 2014). The quasi-periodic pulsations (QPPs) are a phenomenon frequently associated with solar
122
+ flares, and these QPPs in solar flares occur over a vast range of periods, i.e, from a fraction of a second to several minutes (e.g.,
123
+ Nakariakov et al. 2010, 2016; Kashapova et al. 2020). The different periods of QPPs may be related to the different physical
124
+ processes in the solar atmosphere. Recently, Zimovets et al. (2021) have reviewed the observational and theoretical aspects of
125
+ the QPPs in solar and stellar flares, and they suggest more than fifteen different mechanisms in support of the formation of QPPs
126
+ in solar/stellar flares. All these physical mechanisms for QPPs are primarily associated with either MHD waves or quasi-periodic
127
+ regimes of magnetic reconnection. As we know that QPPs are very common phenomena associated with solar/stellar flares
128
+ while the observational detection of QPPs in solar jets is very rare. So far, there are only a few observational works that report
129
+ the existence of the QPPs in the solar jets (e.g., Morton et al. 2012; Zhang & Ji 2014). Similar to the QPPs in solar flares,
130
+ it is reported that multiple magnetic reconnection can trigger the QPPs in blowout jets also (Morton et al. 2012). Here, we
131
+ mention that QPPs are not well studied in solar jets as there are only a few reports of QPPs in solar jets so far. And, on top of this
132
+ fact, we further say that solar jet, kink-instability, and the formation of QPPs are not investigated as per the best of our knowledge.
133
+ In the present scientific work, we provide a systematic observational study of solar jet triggered due to the kink instability, and
134
+ subsequent evolution of quasi-periodic pulsations. The observations and data analysis are discussed in section 2. In section 3 we
135
+ presents the observational results related to the eruption of kink unstable jets and quasi-periodic pulsation. Finally, the discussion
136
+ and conclusion are presented in Section 4.
137
+ 2. OBSERVATIONS AND DATA ANALYSIS
138
+ The Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) onboard Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) provides the full-disk images of
139
+ the Sun in several filters (i.e., AIA 4500Å, AIA 1600 Å, AIA 1700 Å, AIA 304 Å, AIA 171 Å, AIA 211 Å, AIA 131 Å, and
140
+ AIA 94 Å; Lemen et al. 2012). Some filters capture the emission from the extreme ultra-violet (EUV)/UV region, and one filter
141
+ of AIA captures the emission from the visible waveband. Therefore, these AIA filters capture the emission of the Sun from the
142
+ top of the photosphere to the lower corona. The spatial resolution of the EUV waveband is 1.5′′ with 0.6′′ per pixel width and
143
+ a cadence of 12 seconds (see Lemen et al. 2012 for more details). We use multi-wavelength imaging observation obtained from
144
+ AIA/SDO for this present work. The jet was triggered around ∼06:28 UT on August 29th, 2014 near the west limb of the Sun,
145
+ and the jet event ended at ≈07:20 UT.
146
+ The AIA images are used to understand the temporal evolution of this jet event. In addition to the temporal evolution, the AIA
147
+ images can also be used to perform the differential emission measures (DEM). The Differential Emission Measure (DEM) is a
148
+ very useful parameter to understand the thermal nature of this jet event. To estimate the DEM, we have used the method developed
149
+ by Hannah & Kontar (2012). This method uses regularized inversion technique to perform the DEM using the warm/hot EUV
150
+ channel of AIA/SDO (i.e., 94 Å, 131 Å, 171 Å, 193 Å, 211 Å, and 335 Å). It is an automated method that uses the zeroth-order
151
+ regularized inversion to return the DEM as a function of temperature. This regularized method provide a positive solution for
152
+ the extracted DEM. We divide the temperature range between log T=5.0–7.5 K, with 25 temperature bins and an interval of log
153
+ ∆T=0.1 K.
154
+ In addition to AIA imaging observations, we also use imaging (slit-jaw images(SJI)) and simultaneous spectroscopic observa-
155
+ tions obtained from the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph (IRIS). The IRIS telescope captures the emission from the lower
156
+ solar atmosphere (chromosphere and transition region) using a slit-jaw imager (SJI), and IRIS takes images in far ultraviolet
157
+ (FUV: 1331.56–1358.40 Å and 1390.00–1406.79 Å) and near ultraviolet (NUV: 2782.56–2833.89 Å) wavebands. IRIS does not
158
+ provide full-disk images rather it provided small field-of-view (FOV) images of the Sun in some filters, namely, Mg ii 2796.0 Å
159
+ filter, Si iv 1400 Å filter, C ii 1330 Å filter, and more filters (for more details see; De Pontieu et al. 2014). The IRIS has observed
160
+
161
+ 4
162
+ Mishra et al.
163
+ 80
164
+ 100
165
+ 120
166
+ 140
167
+ 160
168
+ Y (arcsec)
169
+ 80
170
+ 100
171
+ 120
172
+ 140
173
+ 160
174
+ 06:29:31 UT
175
+ 06:29:55 UT
176
+ 80
177
+ 100
178
+ 120
179
+ 140
180
+ 160
181
+ Y (arcsec)
182
+ 80
183
+ 100
184
+ 120
185
+ 140
186
+ 160
187
+ 06:30:19 UT
188
+ 06:30:43 UT
189
+ 06:31:07 UT
190
+ 940
191
+ 960
192
+ 980
193
+ 1000
194
+ X (arcsec)
195
+ 80
196
+ 100
197
+ 120
198
+ 140
199
+ 160
200
+ Y (arcsec)
201
+ 940
202
+ 960
203
+ 980
204
+ 1000
205
+ 80
206
+ 100
207
+ 120
208
+ 140
209
+ 160
210
+ 06:31:31 UT
211
+ 940
212
+ 960
213
+ 980
214
+ 1000
215
+ X (arcsec)
216
+ 940
217
+ 960
218
+ 980
219
+ 1000
220
+ 06:31:55 UT
221
+ 940
222
+ 960
223
+ 980
224
+ 1000
225
+ X (arcsec)
226
+ 940
227
+ 960
228
+ 980
229
+ 1000
230
+ 06:32:19 UT
231
+ Twist in jet
232
+ Twist in jet
233
+ Kink unstable jet
234
+ Northern leg
235
+ Southern leg
236
+ AIA 304 06:29:07 UT
237
+ N
238
+ S
239
+ W
240
+ E
241
+ Inverse γ
242
+ �shape
243
+ Inverse γ
244
+ �shape
245
+ Bright knot
246
+ (a)
247
+ (b)
248
+ (c)
249
+ (d)
250
+ (e)
251
+ (f)
252
+ (g)
253
+ (h)
254
+ (i)
255
+ Figure 1. The sequence of the images from SDO/AIA 304 Å with reverse color contrast shows the onset of the kink instability in a blowout jet.
256
+ The morphological sign of kink instability (inverse γ-shape), bright knot, propagation of brightening along the twisted field lines, and rotation
257
+ of the plasma thread (i.e., twist in the jet) have been identified, and these observational findings are indicated by the different arrows. The first
258
+ panel shows the direction to understand the dynamics in the jet’s leg. The black and white arrow indicates the northern and southern legs of the
259
+ eruptive jet (last panel).
260
+ this jet event only in the C ii 1330 Å filter with the temporal cadence of 10 seconds, and the full field-of-view (FOV) of SJI is
261
+ 119′′×119′′.
262
+ The IRIS also provides spectroscopic observations, and it observes some of the prominent spectral lines of interface-region, such
263
+ as Mg ii k 2796Å, Mg ii h 2803 Å, C ii 1334.53 Å, C ii 1335.66 Å, Si iv 1393.76 Å, and Si iv 1402.77 Å. IRIS has observed the
264
+ spectra of this particular jet event with an 8-step coarse raster observation of temporal cadence of 9.6 seconds. Hence, each raster
265
+ file of this observation takes ∼77 seconds (i.e., 8.0×9.6 = 76.8 seconds).
266
+ Lastly, we mention that we have also utilized wavelet analysis to diagnose the quasi-periodic behavior of various light curves
267
+ extracted from this jet event. We adopt the method of Torrence & Compo (1998) for the wavelet analysis of the time series. We
268
+ have applied the wavelet analysis on AIA 304 Å, AIA 171 Å, AIA 131 Å, and AIA 211 Å filter observations. We computed the
269
+ wavelet power, global power, and 95% significance levels using the method developed by Torrence & Compo (1998).
270
+ 3. OBSERVATIONAL RESULTS
271
+ We used high-resolution multi-wavelength imaging and spectroscopic data of AIA and IRIS to study an eruptive jet on August
272
+ 29th, 2014. This jet was situated near the west limb, and the jet was initiated around 06:28 UT. Here, we have described the whole
273
+ jet event in upcoming subsections.
274
+ 3.1. Onset of the Kink-instability
275
+
276
+ QPP in Kink Unstable Jet
277
+ 5
278
+ We use a sequence of AIA 304 Å images to understand the spatio-temporal evolution of kink instability in a blowout jet (cf.,
279
+ Figure 1). The images of Figure 1 are plotted in the reverse intensity. The direction system is displayed in the panel (a) of
280
+ Figure 1. This blowout jet starts to lift at ≈06:28 UT from an active region NOAA 12146. At t = 06:29:07 UT, we see the inverse
281
+ γ-shape structure outlined by a white-dashed line (panel a; Figure 1), which is a manifestation of the writhing motion near the
282
+ base of the jet. This magnetized structure (i.e., inverse γ-shape structure) is developing with time, i.e., it is expanding and rising
283
+ (panels (b) and (c); Figure 1; animation 1.mp4, animation 2.mp4). In the meantime, the inverse γ-shape structure performs an
284
+ anticlockwise twist (see attached animation; animation 1.mp4), and as a result, it may become kink unstable. The characteristic
285
+ inverse γ-shape evolves due to the conversion of the initial twist into the writhe (T¨or¨ok et al. 2010, 2014), and the inverse γ
286
+ shape-like structure is a morphological signature for the onset of the kink instability.
287
+ We see that the inverse γ-shape structure is lifting and expanding with time (panels (b) and (c); Figure 1). Now, at time t
288
+ = 06:30:19 UT, the inverse γ-shape structure has fully developed, and again we have outlined the fully developed structure by
289
+ the white dashed line (panel (d); Figure 1). We see little brightening around the knot (i.e., cross point) of the inverse γ-shape
290
+ structure. In addition, we also see localized bright dots, and two bright dots are indicated by two black arrows (see panel d). The
291
+ bright dots further propagate upward along the magnetic field lines as the jet develops with time. The brightening at the knot (as
292
+ indicated by white arrows in the panel (e); Figure 1) is becoming stronger and wider with time (see, panels (e) and (f); Figure 1;
293
+ animation 1.mp4, animation 2.mp4).
294
+ Meanwhile, the plasma is moving up along the magnetic field that is forming the main body of this jet. This jet is not well-
295
+ collimated as the width of the jet is increasing with time (see, panels (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), and (i); Figure 1; animation 1.mp4,
296
+ animation 2.mp4). Hence, this jet is a typical blowout jet as per the morphological classification of the solar jets (e.g., Moore et al.
297
+ 2010, 2013). The jet is made of various plasma threads, and out of them, we have marked one plasma thread at 06:30:43 UT
298
+ by a black arrow (panel (e); Figure 1). This particular thread is located at the top edge of the jet this time (i.e., 06:30:43 UT),
299
+ and further, we have traced this particular plasma thread at various other times (please see the black arrows from panel (e) to (l);
300
+ Figure 1). This particular thread follows anticlockwise motion with time, which suggests that the jet spire is rotating. In addition,
301
+ we have also shown the evolution of the jet using IRIS 1330 Å filter (cf., figure A.1). This animated figure describes the main
302
+ features of the jet as per the IRIS animations (animation 1.mp4, animation 2.mp4). Similar to AIA 304 Å, the IRIS/SJI 1330 Å
303
+ filter observations also show the rotating motion of the jet. Hence, finally, we can say that the rotating motion of the jet plasma is
304
+ also visible in the animated figure A.1.
305
+ 3.2. Multi-wavelength imaging observations of solar jet
306
+ In the previous subsection (i.e., section 3.1), we have described the dynamics of the inverse γ-shape flux-rope and triggering
307
+ of the blowout jet. In this subsection, we are investigating the dynamics of the blowout jet in cool (i.e., AIA 1600 Å, AIA 304 Å,
308
+ and IRIS/SJI 1330 Å) and warm/hot temperature filters (i.e., AIA 171 Å, AIA 131 Å, and AIA 94 Å) to understand the multi-
309
+ wavelength nature of this jet. The distinction between hot and cool temperature filters is relative, and the classification between
310
+ hot and cool temperatures may changes from case to case. Here, in the present study, we say that AIA 1600 Å, AIA 304 Å,
311
+ and IRIS/SJI 1330 Å are cool filters while AIA 171 Å, AIA 131 Å, and AIA 94 Å are warm/hot filters. We know that this
312
+ inverse γ-shape magnetic structure lifts up with time (see; Figure 1). Here, in this subsection, we have discussed the multi-
313
+ wavelength observations of the blowout jet. The Figure 2 shows the spatio-temporal evolution of the jet in AIA 1600 Å (top
314
+ row), IRIS/SJI 1330 Å (second row), AIA 171 Å (third row), and AIA 131 Å wavebands. Similar to Figure 1, we have again
315
+ displayed the directions in the panel Figure 2(a1). At t = 06:29:23 UT, the inverse γ-shape structure has significantly developed,
316
+ and the top of this structure is well above the limb. This inverse γ-shape structure is clearly visible in cool temperature filters
317
+ (panel (a1), (a2), (b1), and (b2);Figure 2), but it is not visible in the hot temperature filters (panels (c1), (c2), (d1), and (d2);
318
+ Figure 2; animation 3.mp4). However, we see that the brightened base of inverse γ-shaped structure in the hot temperature filters.
319
+ At the next time (t = 06:29:30 UT), we clearly see the jet in the cool temperature filter which is indicated by the black arrows
320
+ (see, panels (a2) and (b2); Figure 2). At this time, we see a compact brightening in the vicinity of knot of inverse γ-shape structure
321
+ (indicated by black arrows in panels (c2) and (d2); Figure 2) in the hot temperature filters (panels (c2) and (d2); Figure 2). We do
322
+ not see the spire of jet in the hot temperature filters as we have seen in cool filters. At the next time (t = 06:31:18 UT), the jet is
323
+ fully developed with two legs rooted at the solar surface (panels (a3) and (b3); Figure 2). The upper leg is termed as northern leg
324
+ while the lower leg is termed as southern leg. And, these two legs are clearly indicated by the white and black arrows in the panels
325
+ (a3) and (b3) of Figure 2, respectively. Interestingly, we do see the signature of bi-directional flows, i.e., plasma falls along both
326
+
327
+ 6
328
+ Mishra et al.
329
+ 80
330
+ 100
331
+ 120
332
+ 140
333
+ 160
334
+ Y (arcsec)
335
+ 80
336
+ 100
337
+ 120
338
+ 140
339
+ 160
340
+ 06:29:28 UT
341
+ Inverse γ−shape
342
+ (b1) IRIS/SJ I 1330
343
+ 06:30:16 UT
344
+ Kink unstable jet
345
+ (b2)IRIS/SJ I 1330
346
+ 06:32:25 UT
347
+ (b3)
348
+ a
349
+ IRIS/SJ I 1330
350
+ Northern leg
351
+ Southern leg
352
+ b
353
+ IRIS/SJ I 1330
354
+ 06:35:56 UT
355
+ (b4)IRIS/SJ I 1330
356
+ 80
357
+ 100
358
+ 120
359
+ 140
360
+ 160
361
+ Y (arcsec)
362
+ 80
363
+ 100
364
+ 120
365
+ 140
366
+ 160
367
+ 06:29:43 UT
368
+ (c1)
369
+ AIA 171
370
+ 06:30:19 UT
371
+ (c2)
372
+ AIA 171
373
+ 06:31:19 UT
374
+ AIA 171
375
+ (c3)
376
+ a
377
+ b
378
+ 06:36:23 UT
379
+ AIA 171
380
+ (c4)
381
+ 80
382
+ 100
383
+ 120
384
+ 140
385
+ 160
386
+ Y (arcsec)
387
+ 80
388
+ 100
389
+ 120
390
+ 140
391
+ 160
392
+ 06:29:23 UT
393
+ Inverse γ−shape
394
+ AIA 1600
395
+ (a1)
396
+ 06:30:30 UT
397
+ Kink unstable jet
398
+ (a2)
399
+ AIA 1600
400
+ 06:31:18 UT
401
+ AIA 1600
402
+ (a3)
403
+ a
404
+ b
405
+ Northern leg
406
+ Southern leg
407
+ 06:35:52 UT
408
+ (a4)
409
+ AIA 1600
410
+ 940
411
+ 960
412
+ 980
413
+ 1000
414
+ 1020
415
+ X (arcsec)
416
+ 80
417
+ 100
418
+ 120
419
+ 140
420
+ 160
421
+ Y (arcsec)
422
+ 940
423
+ 960
424
+ 980
425
+ 1000
426
+ 1020
427
+ 80
428
+ 100
429
+ 120
430
+ 140
431
+ 160
432
+ 06:29:32 UT
433
+ AIA 131
434
+ (d1)
435
+ 940
436
+ 960
437
+ 980
438
+ 1000
439
+ 1020
440
+ X (arcsec)
441
+ 940
442
+ 960
443
+ 980
444
+ 1000
445
+ 1020
446
+ 06:31:08 UT
447
+ AIA 131
448
+ (d2)
449
+ 940
450
+ 960
451
+ 980
452
+ 1000
453
+ 1020
454
+ X (arcsec)
455
+ 940
456
+ 960
457
+ 980
458
+ 1000
459
+ 1020
460
+ 06:32:32 UT
461
+ AIA 131
462
+ (d3)
463
+ a
464
+ b
465
+ 940
466
+ 960
467
+ 980
468
+ 1000
469
+ 1020
470
+ X (arcsec)
471
+ 940
472
+ 960
473
+ 980
474
+ 1000
475
+ 1020
476
+ 06:36:08 UT
477
+ AIA 131
478
+ (d4)
479
+ N
480
+ S
481
+ W
482
+ E
483
+ Figure 2. The figures show the multi-wavelength view of the kink unstable blowout jet observed on August 29th, 2014 by SDO/AIA and IRIS.
484
+ It shows the morphological evolution of kink unstable blowout jet in the different layers of the solar atmosphere (i.e., AIA 1600 (top row),
485
+ IRIS/SJI 1330 (second row), AIA 304 (third row), and AIA 131 (bottom row)). In this evolution, we have seen various important features of
486
+ this blowout jet, namely, the development of inverse γ-shape in the cool filters (panels (a1) and (b1)), bright knot due to magnetic reconnection
487
+ along with the triggering of blowout jet (panels (a2), (b2), (c2), and (d2)), bi-directional flows from bright know ((a3), (b3), (c3), and (d3)),
488
+ and matured phase of jet with a cavity (panels (a4) and (b4)). Here, it should be noted that the jet is mainly visible in the cool filters, and does
489
+ not emit much in hot filters. However, we see a compact bright structure in the hot filters (see (c2) and (d2)) which justifies the occurrence
490
+ of internal magnetic reconnection in highly twisted magnetic field lines of inverse γ-shape near its apex. The northern and southern legs are
491
+ indicated by white and black arrows in the panel (a3) and (b3). The two boxes ’a’ and ’b’ are shown in panels (a3), (b3), (c3), and (d3). We
492
+ have used these boxes to investigate the total emission measure (EM) (see Figure 4(c) and(d)). The animation shows the (animation 3.mp4;
493
+ AIA 304, AIA 171, AIA 131, and AIA 94 Å) triggering and the complete evolution of the kink unstable jet and their association with the
494
+ multi-thermal plasma. The kink instability at the base of the jet, triggering of magnetic reconnection, the eruption of the jet, and associated
495
+ dynamics are shown between 06:25 UT to 07:00 UT. The real-time duration of 12 s for this animation.
496
+ legs below the bright knot (see red arrows in (a3), (b3), (c3), and (d3) panels; Figure 2; animation 3.mp4) while the plasma flows
497
+ up above the bright knot (see blue arrows in (a3), (b3), (c3), and (d3) panels; Figure 2). This bi-directional flow is also clearly
498
+ visible in the animation 1.mp4, animation 2.mp4, animation 3.mp4. This up-and-down flow of the plasma builds the main body
499
+ of this blowout jet. Also, the bi-directional flows of the jet are visible in the cool filters. However, we only see some faint
500
+ signatures of the blowout jet in the hot temperature filters (panels (c3) and (d3); Figure 2). At time t = 06:35:52 UT, the northern
501
+ leg of inverse γ-shape flux-rope is completely disconnected from the solar limb while, the southern leg remains connected to
502
+ the limb of the Sun (panels (a4), (b4), (c4), and (d4); Figure 2). Now, the jet is fully developed at this time along southern leg.
503
+ Interestingly, we see big cavity in the jet plasma that is indicated by cyan color arrows (panels (a4) and (b4); Figure 2). It seems
504
+ that some plasma from the main body of the jet has bifurcated, and the space between main body and bifurcated plasma of jet
505
+ appears the black region (i.e., cavity).
506
+
507
+ QPP in Kink Unstable Jet
508
+ 7
509
+ 3.3. Time-distance analysis of blowout jet
510
+ We have performed the time-distance estimation along and across (perpendicular) the blowout jet to understand the kinematics
511
+ of this blowout jet (cf., Figure 3). We displayed the late phase of the blowout jet along with one horizontal slit (S1) and four
512
+ vertical slits (P1, P2, P3, and P4) in the panel (a) of Figure 3. All of the slits are shown by white dashed lines (panel (a)). As we
513
+ have already indicated that jet is mainly visible in the cool temperature filters, therefore, the time-distance analysis is performed
514
+ using the cool temperature filter, i.e., AIA 304 Å. The panel (b) of Figure 3 shows the time-distance diagram corresponding to
515
+ the horizontal slit (i.e. slit S1). We have considered the width of 30 pixels around the horizontal slit (i.e., 15 pixels on each side
516
+ of the slit) for the time-distance diagram shown in the panel (b) of Figure 3. We have drawn a path (dashed cyan line) on the
517
+ ascending motion of jet plasma, and it is found that the jet plasma is moving up with the speed of 234.0 km s−1. Interestingly, on
518
+ the close inspection, we noticed the multiple intensity enhancement at a regular intervals as indicated by the black arrows in the
519
+ panel (b) of Figure 3. Here, we have identified at-lest three peaks.
520
+ The right column of the Figure 3 shows four time-distance diagrams of the jet deduced from four different heights, i.e., along
521
+ the slits P1 (panel (c)), P2 (panel (d)), P3 (panel (e)), and P4 (panel (f)). Again, we have used the same width of 30 pixels on both
522
+ sides of all four slits (i.e., 15 pixels on both sides of the slit) in the production of time-distance diagrams. The panel (c) shows
523
+ the time-distance diagram along the first vertical slit P1. We have already shown the presence of inverse γ-shape flux-rope, and
524
+ the legs of this flux-rope show opposite motion before the jet eruption (see section 3.2). The slit P1 is located at the base of the
525
+ jet, and covers both legs of the inverse γ-shape flux-rope. We observe two opposite motions of the plasma (white dotted curve on
526
+ panel (c) of Figure 3). This particular pattern is visible due to the opposite motion of the legs of the flux rope.
527
+ The time-distance diagram as per the second slit P2 is displayed in the panel (d) of Figure 3. In the first instance, we see two
528
+ different intensity patches in the time-distance diagram, i.e., the first one is a long & broad patch (indicated by green arrow)
529
+ while the second one is a narrow and slanted patch (indicated by cyan arrow). In the very initial phase, the blowout jet had a
530
+ single body, while after some time the jet body was bifurcated into two parts with a cavity in between them as already explained
531
+ in section 3.2. Even, in the reference image (panel (a); Figure 3), one can see the long straight main body of the jet, and some
532
+ plasma fragments are distributed on a curved path below the main body of the jet. The base of slit P2 lies on the curved path, and
533
+ then the slit crosses some part of the cavity before covering the main body of the jet. Hence, the bottom narrow slanted intensity
534
+ patch (indicated by cyan color arrow) in the time-distance diagram forms due to the plasma fragments along a curved path. While
535
+ the long & broad patch (indicated by green arrow) is due to the dynamics of the main jet body.
536
+ The main body of the blowout jet contains small bright dots that are indicated by white arrows in the long straight intensity
537
+ patch. The time-distance diagram along the slit S1 (i.e., panel (b); Figure 3) has already shown the multiple intensity peaks. We
538
+ observe that same intensity enhancement is visible as multiple bright dots on regular time-interval in this time-distance diagram
539
+ (panel (d) of Figure 3) drawn for the across the jet (i.e., slit P2). Here, at least we have identified three bright dots, and it should
540
+ be noted that these bright dots are aligned on the slanted path in the broad & long patch.
541
+ The time-distance diagram corresponding to slit P3 is displayed in the panel (e) of Figure 3. Similar to the previous time-
542
+ distance diagram, at this height, we also see the bright dots in the main body of the jet. Here, again these bright dots are indicated
543
+ by the white arrows in the time-distance diagram corresponding to slit P3 (panel (e); Figure 3), and these bright dots are on the
544
+ slanted path in the long & broad patch (indicated by green arrow). The narrow slanted patch of intensity (indicated by cyan
545
+ arrow) exists here as already seen in the panel (d) of Figure 3. The last vertical slit (i.e., slit P4) is located very far away from
546
+ the base of the jet. And, the panel (f) of Figure 3 shows the time-distance diagram corresponding to this slit. Again, we see both
547
+ patches of intensity as already seen in the panels (d) and (e). Although, intensity in the slanted patch is weak in comparison to
548
+ the panels (d) and (e) of Figure 3. It is because that slit P4 is located near the top part of the jet. However, we see the multiple
549
+ bright dots like the time-distance diagrams corresponding to the slits P2 (panel (d)) and P3 (panel (e) of Figure 3).
550
+ 3.4. Thermal structure of blowout jet
551
+ We perform the differential emission measure (DEM) analysis to understand the thermal nature of this blowout jet. We use
552
+ regularized inversion code developed by (Hannah & Kontar 2012) to extract the DEM using hot AIA/SDO filters. We use six hot
553
+ optically thin EUV filters (e.g., 94 Å, 131 Å, 171 Å, 193 Å, 211 Å, and 335 Å) of the AIA/SDO to estimate DEM coming from
554
+ different temperatures bins. In the panels (a1), (a2), and (a3) of Figure 4, we have displayed three emission measure (EM) maps
555
+ deduced from three different temperature ranges (i.e., log T/K = 5.7– 6.0, log T/K = 6.0– 6.3, and log T/K = 6.9– 7.2) during the
556
+ onset of the kink-instability (i.e., t = ∼06:32:03 UT). Similarly, in the panels (b1), (b2), and (b3) of Figure 4, we have shown the
557
+
558
+ 8
559
+ Mishra et al.
560
+ Distance (Mm)
561
+ 0.0
562
+ 5.0
563
+ 10.0
564
+ 15.0
565
+ Time in minutes (start from 06:25 UT)
566
+ 0
567
+ 20
568
+ 40
569
+ 60
570
+ 80
571
+ 100
572
+ 120
573
+ 20.0
574
+ 25.0
575
+ 234 km/s
576
+ 0
577
+ 20
578
+ 40
579
+ 60
580
+ Distance (Mm)
581
+ 0
582
+ 20
583
+ 40
584
+ 60
585
+ Distance (Mm)
586
+ 0.0
587
+ 5.0
588
+ 10.0
589
+ 15.0
590
+ 20.0
591
+ 25.0
592
+ Time in minutes (start from 06:25 UT)
593
+ 0
594
+ 20
595
+ 40
596
+ 60
597
+ Distance (Mm)
598
+ 0
599
+ 10
600
+ 20
601
+ 30
602
+ Distance (Mm)
603
+ Broad & long patch
604
+ Slanted patch
605
+ Broad & long patch
606
+ Slanted patch
607
+ 950
608
+ 1000
609
+ 1050
610
+ 1100
611
+ 1150
612
+ X (arcsecs)
613
+ 0
614
+ 50
615
+ 100
616
+ 150
617
+ Y (arcsecs)
618
+ 950
619
+ 1000
620
+ 1050
621
+ 1100
622
+ 1150
623
+ 0
624
+ 50
625
+ 100
626
+ 150
627
+ 06:37:55 UT
628
+ P1
629
+ P2
630
+ P3
631
+ P4
632
+ S1
633
+ Slanted patch
634
+ Broad & long patch
635
+ (a)
636
+ (b)
637
+ (c)
638
+ (d)
639
+ (e)
640
+ (f)
641
+ Figure 3. The panel (a) shows the intensity image from AIA 304 Å at t = 06:37:55 UT, i.e., from the decay phase of the jet. The over-plotted
642
+ dashed lines are various slits along (i.e., S1) and across (i.e., P1, P2, P3, and P4) the jet, and they are used to produce the time-distance diagrams.
643
+ The time-distance diagram along the slit S1 is shown in the panel (b), and we have drawn a line (i.e., dashed cyan line) along the ascending
644
+ phase of the jet to estimate the speed of the blowout jet which is 234 km/s. We have also seen multiple spikes in this time-distance diagram
645
+ which are indicated by the black arrows. In the right column, we have shown the time-distance diagrams along the slits P1 (panel (c)), P2 (panel
646
+ (d)), P3 (panel (e)), and P4 (panel (f)). Here, we have seen the opposite motion of inverse γ-shape as indicated by the path drawn by the cyan
647
+ dashed line in panel (c). Further, we have also seen the bright dots jet’s body which is indicated by white arrows (panels (d) and (e)). Here,
648
+ we see a slanted intensity patch (panels (d), (e), and (f)) in the last three panels of the right column which is occurring due to the fragmented
649
+ plasma on a curved path from the main body of the blowout jet.
650
+
651
+ QPP in Kink Unstable Jet
652
+ 9
653
+ same three EM maps during the developed phase of the blowout jet (i.e., t = ∼06:35:03 UT).
654
+ In the initial phase, EM maps show a significant emission around the bright knot (as defined previously in sections 3.1 and 3.2)
655
+ above the legs of inverse γ flux-rope as indicated by the black arrows in (a1), (a2), and (a3) panels of the Figure 4. The emission
656
+ in the bright knot region exists over a very wide range of the temperature, i.e., log T = 5.7 to 7.2 K. Hence, it justifies the presence
657
+ of multi-thermal plasma at the knot of inverse γ-shape flux-rope. After approximately 03 minutes, the emissions in the vicinity
658
+ of the bright knot are significantly reduced (see all panels (b1), (b2), and (b3); Figure 4). Although we see little emission in the
659
+ bottom region of the bright knot. And, a faint jet originating from this little emission area. The faint jet is indicated by the black
660
+ arrows in the panels (b1), (b2), and (b3) of Figure 4.This EM study indicates that the spire of jet has very little hot emission. That
661
+ is consistent with this jet showing up strongly in the cool filters, and being very faint in the hot filters.
662
+ We have selected a box (a) within the bright knot region (see, black rectangular box in panel (a1); Figure 4) to know the
663
+ temporal behavior of DEM. We classify the entire DEM into five different temperature ranges (bins), namely, 0.5–1.0, 1.0–2.0,
664
+ 2.0–4.0, 4.0–8.0, and 8.0–15 MK. Then, we estimated emission (EM =
665
+ � Tmax
666
+ Tmin DEM(T)dT) in all above specified temperature
667
+ bins. Through this approach, we got five different EM curves, and they are displayed by five different colors in the panel (c) of
668
+ Figure 4. It is visible that all five curves show a dominant peak during the formation of the bright knot. The total emission in all
669
+ five temperature ranges is highest during the formation of the bright knot.
670
+ We also extract the EM curves from another box (i.e., box (b)), which is situated inside the southern leg of the blowout jet
671
+ (please see box (b) in panel (b1) of Figure 4). These EM curves are displayed in panel (d) of Figure 4. Interestingly, the EM
672
+ curves from box (b) show periodic nature, unlike the nature of EM curves deduced from the box (a) (panel (c) of Figure 4). The
673
+ box (a) is located in the northern leg of the blowout jet that erupts completely during the initial phase of the blowout jet. The
674
+ plasma is completely swept away in the vicinity of the northern leg right after its eruption. Hence, we see only one dominant
675
+ peak in EM curves extracted from the box (a). While, box (b) is situated near the base of the stable leg (i.e., southern leg) of this
676
+ blowout jet. The periodic nature of EM curves extracted from the box (b) is present in all five temperature bins. We can easily
677
+ locate at least three to four peaks in each EM curve, and it matches with the intensity light curve extracted from the different
678
+ boxes from cool temperature filter AIA 304Å (see, section 3.6). The vertical black dotted line in the lower panels (i.e., panels (c)
679
+ and (d); Figure 4) indicates the jet event start time (t = ∼06:28 UT).
680
+ 3.5. Spectroscopic diagnosis of blowout jet
681
+ In addition to the slit jaw images, IRIS has also captured the near ultraviolet (NUV) as well as far ultraviolet (FUV) spectrum
682
+ of this jet event. The panel (a) of Figure 5 shows the IRIS/SJI intensity map at a time of ∼06:32:06 UT. The IRIS has observed the
683
+ event with a roll angle of 90◦. Therefore, this IRIS/SJI intensity map (i.e., panel (a)) of the Figure 5 is 90◦ rotated in comparison
684
+ to other Figures (i.e., Figure 1, 2, and other Figures) of this manuscript. Here, we mention that direction system is added in the
685
+ panel (a) of Figure 5. We have over-plotted all eight slit positions (i.e., eight vertical gray-dashed lines) on this IRIS/SJI intensity
686
+ map (panel a). Then, we have chosen two locations to know the nature of Si iv, C ii and Mg ii profiles, namely, red plus sign
687
+ (x = 993.12” and y = 95.19”) and blue plus sign (x = 997.12” and y = 93.52”). It should be noted that the selected locations
688
+ (red and blue plus sign in panel a of Figure 5) are located in the vicinity of the bright knot region, i.e., most probably in the
689
+ magnetic-reconnection region.
690
+ In the imaging analysis, we have already shown the existence of the bi-directional flows in this jet event (see; section 3.2). And,
691
+ as per the imaging analysis, the red plus sign lies in the down-flow region while the blue plus sign is in the up-flow region (see;
692
+ Figure 2 and section 3.2). In Figure 5, we have displayed Si iv 1393.77 Å spectral profiles from red plus sign location by the red
693
+ curve at three different times (i.e., 06:30:21 UT (panel b), 06:31:37 UT (panel c), and 06:32:54 UT (panel d)). Similarly, the Si iv
694
+ 1393.77 Å spectral profiles from blue plus locations are displayed by the black curve at three different times (i.e., t = 06:30:40 UT
695
+ (panel (b)), 06:31:56 UT (panel (c)), and 06:33:13 UT (panel (d)). In the same way, we have shown the spectral profiles from red
696
+ plus (red curve) and blue plus locations (black curve) of C ii 1335.66 Å spectral profiles (see panels (e), (f), and (g)) and Mg ii
697
+ 2796.35 Å (see panels (h), (i), and (j)).
698
+ We have noticed that all black profiles (i.e., from Si iv, C ii, and Mg ii at all three times) are blue-shifted (upflows) while all the
699
+ red profiles are red-shifted (down-flows). Hence, we can say that all three spectral lines (e.g., Si iv, C ii, and Mg ii) justify that
700
+ red plus location is dominated by plasma downfall while the blue plus location is dominated by up flows, i.e., the spectra confirm
701
+ the presence of bi-directional flows in the vicinity of the bright knot. Hence, finally, we can say that both (spectra and images)
702
+ confirm the presence of bi-directional flows in the vicinity of the bright knot. In addition, we do see very broad profiles from
703
+ Si iv, C ii, and Mg ii spectral lines during the initial/main phases of the blowout jet. Si iv 1393.77 Å spectral line is an optically
704
+
705
+ 10
706
+ Mishra et al.
707
+ 80
708
+ 100
709
+ 120
710
+ 140
711
+ 160
712
+ Y (arcsec)
713
+ 80
714
+ 100
715
+ 120
716
+ 140
717
+ 160
718
+ log T=5.7-6.0
719
+ a
720
+ 06:32:03 UT
721
+ (a1)
722
+ log T=6.0-6.3
723
+ Bright knot
724
+ (a2)
725
+ log T=6.9-7.2
726
+ (a3)
727
+ 940
728
+ 960
729
+ 980
730
+ 1000
731
+ X (arcsec)
732
+ 80
733
+ 100
734
+ 120
735
+ 140
736
+ 160
737
+ Y (arcsec)
738
+ 940
739
+ 960
740
+ 980
741
+ 1000
742
+ 80
743
+ 100
744
+ 120
745
+ 140
746
+ 160
747
+ 06:35:03 UT log T=5.7-6.0
748
+ (b1)
749
+ b
750
+ Spire of jet
751
+ 940
752
+ 960
753
+ 980
754
+ 1000
755
+ X (arcsec)
756
+ 940
757
+ 960
758
+ 980
759
+ 1000
760
+ log T=6.0-6.3
761
+ Spire of jet
762
+ (b2)
763
+ 940
764
+ 960
765
+ 980
766
+ 1000
767
+ X (arcsec)
768
+ 940
769
+ 960
770
+ 980
771
+ 1000
772
+ log T=6.9-7.2
773
+ Spire of jet
774
+ (b3)
775
+ 19
776
+ 19
777
+ 20
778
+ 21
779
+ 22
780
+ 23
781
+ 24
782
+ log10(EM)[cm
783
+ -5 K
784
+ -1]
785
+ Bright knot
786
+ Bright knot
787
+ 0
788
+ 500
789
+ 1000
790
+ 1500
791
+ 2000
792
+ 2500
793
+ Time (seconds) start from 06:20 UT
794
+ 0.2
795
+ 0.4
796
+ 0.6
797
+ 0.8
798
+ 1.0
799
+ Normalized EM
800
+ (c)
801
+ T[0.5--1.0]MK
802
+ max[EM]=1.36*10
803
+ 23 cm
804
+ -5 K
805
+ -1
806
+ T[1.0--2.0]MK
807
+ max[EM]=6.24*10
808
+ 23 cm
809
+ -5 K
810
+ -1
811
+ T[2.0--4.0]MK
812
+ max[EM]=1.12*10
813
+ 24 cm
814
+ -5 K
815
+ -1
816
+ T[4.0--8.0]MK
817
+ max[EM]=3.92*10
818
+ 23 cm
819
+ -5 K
820
+ -1
821
+ T[8.0--15.0]MK
822
+ max[EM]=1.65*10
823
+ 23 cm
824
+ -5 K
825
+ -1
826
+ 0
827
+ 500
828
+ 1000
829
+ 1500
830
+ 2000
831
+ 2500
832
+ Time (seconds) start from 06:20 UT
833
+ 0.4
834
+ 0.6
835
+ 0.8
836
+ 1.0
837
+ Normalized EM
838
+ (d)
839
+ T[0.5--1.0]MK
840
+ max[EM]=1.14*10
841
+ 23 cm
842
+ -5 K
843
+ -1
844
+ T[1.0--2.0]MK
845
+ max[EM]=5.54*10
846
+ 23 cm
847
+ -5 K
848
+ -1
849
+ T[2.0--4.0]MK
850
+ max[EM]=8.64*10
851
+ 23 cm
852
+ -5 K
853
+ -1
854
+ T[4.0--8.0]MK
855
+ max[EM]=3.56*10
856
+ 23 cm
857
+ -5 K
858
+ -1
859
+ T[8.0--15.0]MK
860
+ max[EM]=2.13*10
861
+ 23 cm
862
+ -5 K
863
+ -1
864
+ Figure 4. The panels (a1), (a2), and (a3) shows EM maps in three different temperature ranges (i.e., log T/K = 5.7–6.0, 6.0–6.3, and 6.9–7.2)
865
+ during the time t = 06:32:03 UT when the magnetic reconnection takes place around the bright knot of inverse-γ structure. The bright knot is
866
+ indicated by the black arrows in all panels of the top row. Similarly, the middle row shows the same EM maps during the developed phase of
867
+ this blowout jet (i.e., t = 06:35:03 UT). Here, we see very faint emission of the jet as indicated by black arrows in the middle row. Further, we
868
+ have selected one box in the northern leg (i.e., box a) and another box in the southern leg (box b) to investigate the temporal variations of the
869
+ EM curves in various temperature ranges. Various EM curves are shown in panels c (box a) and d (box b) of Figure 4 by various colors. The
870
+ color scheme and temperature ranges are mentioned in both panels. All EM curves from the box a show only one peak while all EM curves
871
+ from box b show three to four peaks. The box (a) is located in the northern leg which erupts in the initial phase of the jet.
872
+ thin line, and normally, it is a single peak. However, in this blowout jet, the Si iv 1393.77 Å spectral line is either double peak or
873
+ highly asymmetric profile (panels (b), (c), and (d) of Figure 5). On the other hand, C ii 1335.62 Å and Mg ii 2796.35 Å spectral
874
+ lines are optically thick lines, and mostly, they appear as double peak profiles in the solar atmosphere. However, in this blowout
875
+ jet, we see the very complex type of profiles from C ii 1335.62 Å (see panels (e), (f), and (g)) and Mg ii 2796.35 Å (see panels (h),
876
+
877
+ QPP in Kink Unstable Jet
878
+ 11
879
+ IRIS/SJI- 06:32:06
880
+ 970
881
+ 980
882
+ 990 1000 1010
883
+ X (arcsecs)
884
+ 70
885
+ 80
886
+ 90
887
+ 100
888
+ 110
889
+ 120
890
+ Y (arcsecs)
891
+ (a)
892
+ N
893
+ S
894
+ W
895
+ E
896
+ -200
897
+ -100
898
+ 0
899
+ 100
900
+ 200
901
+ Doppler shift (km/s)
902
+ 10
903
+ 100
904
+ 1000
905
+ Intensity (DN)
906
+ Si IV: 1393.77 A
907
+ t = 06:30:40
908
+ t = 06:30:21
909
+ (b)
910
+ -200
911
+ -100
912
+ 0
913
+ 100
914
+ 200
915
+ Doppler shift (km/s)
916
+
917
+ t = 06:31:56
918
+ t = 06:31:37
919
+ (c)
920
+ -200
921
+ -100
922
+ 0
923
+ 100
924
+ 200
925
+ Doppler shift (km/s)
926
+
927
+ t = 06:33:13
928
+ t = 06:32:54
929
+ (d)
930
+ -150
931
+ -100
932
+ -50
933
+ 0
934
+ 50
935
+ 100
936
+ Doppler shift (km/s)
937
+ 1
938
+ 10
939
+ 100
940
+ Intensity (DN)
941
+ C II: 1335.66 A
942
+ (e)
943
+ -150
944
+ -100
945
+ -50
946
+ 0
947
+ 50
948
+ 100
949
+ Doppler shift (km/s)
950
+
951
+ (f)
952
+ -150
953
+ -100
954
+ -50
955
+ 0
956
+ 50
957
+ 100
958
+ Doppler shift (km/s)
959
+
960
+ (g)
961
+ -150
962
+ -100
963
+ -50
964
+ 0
965
+ 50
966
+ 100
967
+ Doppler shift (km/s)
968
+ 10
969
+ 100
970
+ 1000
971
+ Intensity (DN)
972
+ Mg II: 2796.35 A
973
+ (h)
974
+ -150
975
+ -100
976
+ -50
977
+ 0
978
+ 50
979
+ 100
980
+ Doppler shift (km/s)
981
+
982
+ (i)
983
+ -150
984
+ -100
985
+ -50
986
+ 0
987
+ 50
988
+ 100
989
+ Doppler shift (km/s)
990
+
991
+ (j)
992
+ Figure 5. IRIS/SJI 1330 Å image depicts the blowout jet at time t = 06:32:06 UT along with 8-slit positions shown by white dashed lines in
993
+ panel (a). IRIS has captured the spectra along these slits. Further, we have selected one location (i.e., red plus sign) in the northern leg while
994
+ another location (blue plus sign) in the southern leg of the blowout jet. The panel (b), (c), and (d) show the spectral profiles of Si iv from both
995
+ locations (i.e., the red curve from red plus location and black curve from blue plus location) at time t = 06:30 UT (panel b), 06:31 UT (panel
996
+ (c)), and 06:32 UT (panel (d)). In the same fashion, we have shown C ii (panels (e), (f), and (g)) and Mg ii (panels h, i, and (j)) from both
997
+ locations at the same three times. In general, all the spectral profiles from the red plus location are red-shifted (i.e., plasma downfall) while
998
+ these profiles are blue-shifted (i.e., plasma upflows) from the blue plus location. In addition, all the spectral profiles are very complex profiles.
999
+ (i), and (j)). Such type of complex profiles are reported in some small-scale energetic events (e.g., Peter et al. 2014; Young et al.
1000
+ 2018).
1001
+ Further, we have taken five pixels around blue plus location (see; panel (a) Figure 5), and then all five profiles were averaged
1002
+ to get a single averaged Si iv profile at any particular instant of time. Through this approach, we have produced 33 averaged
1003
+ spectral profiles in a time range from 06:21:43 UT to 07:06:25 UT. This observation is an 8-step coarse raster observation with
1004
+ the cadence of 77 seconds. Therefore, the averaged spectral profile of any location is available after every 77 seconds (i.e.,
1005
+ 8.0*cadence time).
1006
+ Some key averaged spectral profiles are displayed in the Figure 6. Panel (a) does not show the presence of the Si iv line as it
1007
+ is well before the jet event (t = 06:24:17 UT). While, t = 06:29:23 UT, we see the Si IV spectral line as the formation of the jet
1008
+ has already begun (see panel (b); Figure 6). We have fitted the line profile with the single Gaussian (blue curve) to estimate the
1009
+ peak intensity, Doppler velocity, and line width of the profile. The line width of this profile is high (i.e., 46.99 km/s) at time t =
1010
+ 06:29:23 UT (panel (b)). At next time t = 06:31:56 UT, we found that the profile is very wide and asymmetric too. We have fitted
1011
+ this profile with the single Gaussian, and found a very high line width (i.e., 67.66 km/s). It should be noted that the line width
1012
+ has increased a lot (i.e., 67.66 km/s) in comparison to the previous time t = 06:29:29 UT (panel (b). After t = 06:31:56 UT, we
1013
+ notice a decrease pattern in the line width of Si iv 1393.77 Å profiles, i.e., the line width is 39.32 km/s at time t = 06:33:13 (panel
1014
+
1015
+ 12
1016
+ Mishra et al.
1017
+
1018
+ 0.0
1019
+ 0.2
1020
+ 0.4
1021
+ 0.6
1022
+ 0.8
1023
+ 1.0
1024
+ Norm. Counts
1025
+ Si IV: 1393.77 A
1026
+ (a) t = 06:24:17
1027
+
1028
+
1029
+ Width:46.99km/s
1030
+ (b) t = 06:29:23
1031
+
1032
+
1033
+ Width:67.66km/s
1034
+ (c) t = 06:31:56
1035
+
1036
+
1037
+ Width:39.32km/s
1038
+ (d) t = 06:33:13
1039
+
1040
+ 0.0
1041
+ 0.2
1042
+ 0.4
1043
+ 0.6
1044
+ 0.8
1045
+ 1.0
1046
+ Norm. Counts
1047
+ Width:31.22km/s
1048
+ (e) t = 06:34:30
1049
+
1050
+
1051
+ Width:35.59km/s
1052
+ (f) t = 06:35:46
1053
+
1054
+
1055
+ Width:43.60km/s
1056
+ (g) t = 06:37:03
1057
+
1058
+
1059
+ Width:23.41km/s
1060
+ (h) t = 06:38:20
1061
+ -200
1062
+ -100
1063
+ 0
1064
+ 100
1065
+ 200
1066
+ Doppler shift (km/s)
1067
+ 0.0
1068
+ 0.2
1069
+ 0.4
1070
+ 0.6
1071
+ 0.8
1072
+ 1.0
1073
+ Norm. Counts
1074
+ Width:25.79km/s
1075
+ (i) t = 06:39:36
1076
+ -200
1077
+ -100
1078
+ 0
1079
+ 100
1080
+ 200
1081
+ Doppler shift (km/s)
1082
+
1083
+ Width:31.64km/s
1084
+ (j) t = 06:40:53
1085
+ -200
1086
+ -100
1087
+ 0
1088
+ 100
1089
+ 200
1090
+ Doppler shift (km/s)
1091
+
1092
+ Width:26.52km/s
1093
+ (k) t = 06:42:09
1094
+ -200
1095
+ -100
1096
+ 0
1097
+ 100
1098
+ 200
1099
+ Doppler shift (km/s)
1100
+
1101
+ Width:22.09km/s
1102
+ (l) t = 06:43:26
1103
+ Figure 6. The temporal evolution of normalized averaged Si-IV line profiles (i.e., averaged over the five pixels around the blue plus location
1104
+ shown in Figure 5) from the most probable reconnection region. It should be noted that all spectral profiles are normalized by their maximum
1105
+ counts. All the spectral profiles are fitted by single Gaussian (see blue curve in all panels). We do see periodic fluctuations in the line width of
1106
+ Si iv. The first panel does not show the line as it is before the triggering of the solar jets.
1107
+ (d) of Figure 6) and 31.22 km/s at time t = 06:34:30 UT (panel (e); Figure 6). Hence, for approximately 03 minutes (i.e., from
1108
+ 06:31:56 UT to 06:34:40 UT), the line width shows a decreasing pattern as the line width falls from 67.66 km/s to 31.22 km/s.
1109
+ However, this decrease pattern in the line width breaks at time t = 06:35:46 UT as we see that the line width is now increasing
1110
+ with time (see; panels (f) and (g) of Figure 6). But again, the line width decreases with time t = 06:38:20 UT (panel (h); Figure 6).
1111
+ And one more time (i.e., third time), we see the same behavior of the line width, i.e., the line width increase (panels (i) and (j);
1112
+ Figure 6) and decrease further with time (panels (k) and (l) of Figure 6). This particular finding indicates that the line width of
1113
+ the Si iv spectral line has periodic behavior.
1114
+ To understand the periodic behavior of line width clearly, we have plotted the line width with time (see; panel (a) of Figure 7).
1115
+ As we know already, in the specified time range (i.e., t = 06:21:28 UT to 07:03:52 UT), there are 33 spectral lines, i.e., 33
1116
+ line widths values. The specified time range starts from 06:21:28 UT, however, the jet appears in the selected region around
1117
+ 06:28:07 UT (see dashed green vertical line in panel (a); Figure 7). We know that there is no spectral line before 06:28:07 UT,
1118
+ therefore, all the points before the green dashed vertical line have zero line width. We see the increase and decrease in the line
1119
+ width on a regular interval of time (see; panel (a); Figure 7) . The oscillating behavior of the line width exists up to the time
1120
+ of t = 06:48 UT, i.e., up to the red-dashed vertical line. After ∼06:48 UT, the downfall phase of the blowout jet dominates, and
1121
+
1122
+ QPP in Kink Unstable Jet
1123
+ 13
1124
+
1125
+ 20
1126
+ 40
1127
+ 60
1128
+ 80
1129
+ Line Width (km/s)
1130
+ 06:28:07 UT: Upflow
1131
+ 06:48:33 UT: Downfall
1132
+ (a)
1133
+ 0
1134
+ 500
1135
+ 1000
1136
+ 1500
1137
+ 2000
1138
+ 2500
1139
+ Time (Seconds after 06:21:43 UT)
1140
+ -40
1141
+ -20
1142
+ 0
1143
+ 20
1144
+ 40
1145
+ Doppler Velocity (km/s)
1146
+ (b)
1147
+ -60
1148
+ -40
1149
+ -20
1150
+ 0
1151
+ 20
1152
+ 40
1153
+ Doppler Velocity
1154
+ 10
1155
+ 20
1156
+ 30
1157
+ 40
1158
+ 50
1159
+ 60
1160
+ 70
1161
+ Line Width (km/s)
1162
+ R = -0.570
1163
+ y = -0.35x + 31.06
1164
+ (c)
1165
+ Figure 7. The temporal evolution of line width and Doppler velocity from the most probable reconnection region (blue plus sign in Figure 5)
1166
+ is displayed in panels a and b, respectively. The triggering time of the jet is indicated by the green-dashed line, therefore, all the points before
1167
+ the green-dashed line are zero. The downfall phase of the blowout jet dominates after the red vertical dashed line. In the up flow phase of the
1168
+ jet, we do see the periodic behavior of the line width. Further, we also see the periodic behavior of Doppler velocity in the up-flow phase of the
1169
+ blowout jet (panel b). We have performed a correlation between line width and Doppler velocity which is shown in panel (c). It is found that
1170
+ line width is negatively correlated with the Doppler velocity, i.e., line width is during the up-flow, and the line width decreases as line profiles
1171
+ move towards the red-shifts.
1172
+ we don’t see much variations in the line width. So, finally, we can say that oscillations in the line width are present during the
1173
+ up-flow phase of the blowout jet.
1174
+ In addition to the line width, we have also shown the Doppler velocity with the time in panel (b) of Figure 7. The first few
1175
+ points are at zero Doppler velocity (up to the green dashed line) as the jet was not triggered by that time. And after that, we do
1176
+ see the fluctuation in the Doppler velocities (see points after the green dashed line). The careful inspection reveals that Doppler
1177
+ velocity is anti-correlated with line width during the up flow phase of the jet (i.e., points in between the green and red dashed
1178
+ lines). It means when the line width is high then Si iv line is blue-shifted and vice versa. As the line width decreases with time,
1179
+ then in response, the Si iv line moves towards the red shifts. We have already pointed out that there are a few cycles of periodic
1180
+ increase and decrease in the line width during the up-flow phase of the blowout jet. Similarly, we do see a kind of periodic
1181
+ behavior of Doppler velocity too. After 06:48:33 UT, all spectral profiles are red-shifted (see, points after the red dashed vertical
1182
+ line) as this is downfall dominant phase of the blowout jet. Further, we have checked the correlation between the line width and
1183
+ Doppler velocity for the up-flow dominated phase of the blowout jet (i.e., points between green and red dashed vertical lines)
1184
+ which is shown in the panel (c) of Figure 7. Now, it is well clear that line width and Doppler velocity are anti-correlated, i.e., the
1185
+ blue shifts (upflows) have high line width, and when line width moves towards the red shifts (downflows) the line width decrease.
1186
+ The Pearson coefficient is quite good (i.e., -0.57) for this correlation. Hence, we can say that Doppler velocity and line widths
1187
+ are anti-correlated during the up-flow phase of the jet.
1188
+
1189
+ 14
1190
+ Mishra et al.
1191
+ 3.6. Quasi-periodic Pulsation
1192
+ We have found the presence of QPPs during the blowout jet. We have utilized AIA 304 Å, AIA 171 Å, AIA 131 Å, and
1193
+ AIA 211Å filters to study the QPPs in this blowout jet. We have selected four different boxes (i.e., B1, B2, B3, and B4) that are
1194
+ shown in the panel (a) of Figure 8 by different colors. Further, we estimated the averaged intensity curve (i.e., averaged over all
1195
+ pixels in the box) from all four boxes in all AIA filters (i.e, AIA 304 Å, AIA 171 Å, AIA 131 Å, and AIA 211Å). The panels (b)
1196
+ to (q) of Figure 8 show the wavelet analysis from four boxes. The wavelet analysis is performed on the averaged intensity light
1197
+ curves deduced from AIA 304 Å. The panel (b) of Figure 8 shows the averaged AIA 304 Å intensity curve (black curve) deduced
1198
+ from box B1 (black box in panel (a) of Figure 8). There is an over-plotted red curve that is a smoothed averaged intensity curve
1199
+ with a window of 15 points. Further, the panel (f) shows the detrended intensity curve, i.e., averaged AIA 304 Å light curve
1200
+ (black curve) - smoothed AIA 304 Å curve (red curve; panel (b); Figure 8). Then, we applied the wavelet analysis on this
1201
+ detrended light curve, and the deduced wavelet power map is shown in the panel (j) of Figure 8. Here, we do see a concentrated
1202
+ patch of power around the period of 03 minutes (i.e., 3.03 minutes) for a time range from 06 to 20 minutes. Further, we have
1203
+ estimated a 95% significance level that is important to check the reliability of any detected period in the wavelet analysis. And,
1204
+ the 95% significance level is shown by a white contour on the wavelet power map. Now, it is visible that a concentrated patch
1205
+ of the power lies within the 95% significance level contours. The cross-hatched gray area in the panel (j) of Figure 8 outlines
1206
+ the cone-of-influence (COI), and the powers inside this cross-hatched area are not reliable. But, here we can see that all the
1207
+ significant powers are outside of the COI. In the panel (n) of Figure 8, we have shown the global power (i.e., wavelet power
1208
+ averaged over time) against the period. The global power shows dominant peak at a period of ∼03 minutes, i.e., 3.03 minutes.
1209
+ We have applied the wavelet analysis in the same fashion to all other boxes (i.e., B2, B3, and B4) which are shown in panel (a)
1210
+ of Figure 8. The original & smoothed intensity curves, detrended intensity curve, wavelet power maps, and global power maps
1211
+ are shown in the same manner for box B2 (panels (c), (g), (k), and (o)), box B3 (panels (d), (h), (l), and (p)), and box B4 (panels
1212
+ (e), (i), (m), and (q)) in the Figure 8. Boxes B2 and B3 show very similar behavior as we found for box B1. The dominant period
1213
+ is also approximately 03 minutes (i.e., 2.34 minutes for box B2 (panel (o) of Figure 8) and box B3 (panel (p) of Figure 8)) for
1214
+ the almost same time range from 06 to 20 minutes.
1215
+ However, the intensity curve of the last box (i.e., B4) shows a sharp jump in the intensity for a short interval of time (i.e.,
1216
+ around 05 minutes only). It is unlike to the other boxes (B1, B2, and B3) as fluctuations sustain a bit longer therein (around 15
1217
+ minutes). We applied wavelet analysis in the same manner to box B4 also, and we found three concentrated patches of the power
1218
+ around the period of 06, 03, and 0.5 minutes (panel (q) of Figure 8). The wavelet power patches around the period of 06, 03, and
1219
+ 0.5 minutes persist only for 10 minutes, 05 minutes, and less than one minute, respectively. Hence, these periods of box B4 (i.e.,
1220
+ 06, 03, and 0.5 minutes; panel (q) of Figure 8) do not even complete two cycles, therefore, we are assuming them as non-reliable
1221
+ power. In addition, some part of the longer period (06 minutes) also lies within the COI (panel (m) of Figure 8). Hence, finally,
1222
+ we can say that none of the power patches in this wavelet power map of box B4 is reliable. And, we mention that the B4 does not
1223
+ has any periodicity unlike the other boxes (i.e., B1, B2, and B3). We have also shown the QPPs in the same fashion for AIA 171Å
1224
+ (cf., Figure B.1), AIA 131Å (cf., Figure B.2), and AIA 211Å (cf., Figure B.3) in the appendix B. The findings from these fitters
1225
+ are similar to what we have reported for AIA 304Å here.
1226
+ 4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
1227
+ The present work provides an observation of the formation of blowout jet through kink instability. Initially, an inverse γ-shape
1228
+ flux-rope appears on the west limb on August 29th, 2014 that is a morphological indication for the onset of kink instability
1229
+ (T¨or¨ok & Kliem 2005; Pariat et al. 2009; Kayshap et al. 2013; Hassanin & Kliem 2016). The inverse γ-shape flux-rope activates
1230
+ around 06:28:00 UT, i.e., this structure rises, and expands with time. The twisted field lines are associated with inverse γ-shape
1231
+ flux-rope, and these magnetic field lines reconnect. The primary magnetic reconnection takes place around 06:31:00 UT near
1232
+ the apex of the inverse γ-shape flux-rope, i.e., in the vicinity of the bright knot. We have witnessed the bi-directional flows from
1233
+ the apex of the flux rope through the imaging analysis (section 3.2). Various spectral lines (i.e., Si iv, C ii, and Mg ii) clearly
1234
+ show red-shifted profiles (i.e., plasma downfall) below the apex, and all these profiles become blue-shifted (i.e., plasma up flow)
1235
+ above the apex of flux-rope (cf., Figure 5), i.e., bi-directional flows. Hence, both (images and spectra) confirm the presence
1236
+ of bidirectional flows which is a typical characteristic of the magnetic reconnection in the solar atmosphere (Innes et al. 1997;
1237
+ Huang et al. 2014; Innes et al. 2015; Yang et al. 2020; Chitta & Lazarian 2020; Bahauddin et al. 2021; De Pontieu et al. 2021;
1238
+ Antolin et al. 2021). Further, DEM analysis shows the presence of multi-thermal plasma around the knot of inverse γ-shape
1239
+ flux-rope in the wide temperature range (log T/K = 5.4–7.2; Figure 4). Hence, these observational findings (i.e., bi-directional
1240
+
1241
+ QPP in Kink Unstable Jet
1242
+ 15
1243
+ SDO AIA_4 304 29-Aug-2014 06:32:31.134 UT
1244
+ 940
1245
+ 960
1246
+ 980
1247
+ 1000
1248
+ 1020
1249
+ X (arcsec)
1250
+ 60
1251
+ 80
1252
+ 100
1253
+ 120
1254
+ 140
1255
+ 160
1256
+ Y (arcsec)
1257
+ B1
1258
+ B2
1259
+ B3
1260
+ B4
1261
+ (a)
1262
+ 0.0
1263
+ 0.2
1264
+ 0.4
1265
+ 0.6
1266
+ 0.8
1267
+ 1.0
1268
+ Norm Cnts
1269
+ -0.2
1270
+ 0.0
1271
+ 0.2
1272
+ 0.4
1273
+ 0.6
1274
+ Norm Cnts
1275
+ 0
1276
+ 5
1277
+ 10
1278
+ 15
1279
+ 20
1280
+ 25
1281
+ Time (Minutes)
1282
+ 0.5
1283
+ 1.0
1284
+ 2.0
1285
+ 4.0
1286
+ 8.0
1287
+ 16.0
1288
+ Period (Minutes)
1289
+ 1
1290
+ 1
1291
+ 2
1292
+ 4
1293
+ 6
1294
+ 8
1295
+ 10
1296
+ 12
1297
+ Power
1298
+ 0.5
1299
+ 1.0
1300
+ 2.0
1301
+ 4.0
1302
+ 8.0
1303
+ 16.0
1304
+ Global Period (Minutes)
1305
+ Global Period at max. power ( 3.03 min.)
1306
+ 0
1307
+ 5
1308
+ 10
1309
+ 15
1310
+ 20
1311
+ 25
1312
+ Time (Minutes)
1313
+ Ł’
1314
+ Ł’
1315
+ Ł’
1316
+ 2
1317
+ 4
1318
+ 6
1319
+ Power
1320
+ Global Period at max. power ( 2.34 min.)
1321
+ 0
1322
+ 5
1323
+ 10
1324
+ 15
1325
+ 20
1326
+ 25
1327
+ Time (Minutes)
1328
+ Ł<@DRRA
1329
+ Ł<@DRRA
1330
+ 2
1331
+ 4
1332
+ 6
1333
+ 8
1334
+ Power
1335
+ Global Period at max. power ( 2.34 min.)
1336
+ 0
1337
+ 5
1338
+ 10
1339
+ 15
1340
+ 20
1341
+ 25
1342
+ Time (Minutes)
1343
+ 0.0
1344
+ 3.7
1345
+ 7.4
1346
+ 11.1
1347
+ 14.9
1348
+ 1
1349
+ 2
1350
+ 3
1351
+ 4
1352
+ 5
1353
+ Power
1354
+ (b)
1355
+ (c)
1356
+ (d)
1357
+ (e)
1358
+ (f)
1359
+ (g)
1360
+ (h)
1361
+ (i)
1362
+ (j)
1363
+ (k)
1364
+ (l)
1365
+ (m)
1366
+ (n)
1367
+ (o)
1368
+ (p)
1369
+ (q)
1370
+ Figure 8. The panel (a) displays SDO/AIA 304 Å image of the blowout jet at time t = 06:32:31 UT, and we select five boxes (B1, B2, B3, and
1371
+ B4) to deduce the emission curve from this filter. The temporal evolution of the intensity (i.e., black curve) in AIA 304 Å filter from box B1
1372
+ is displayed in the first panel of the first column. The over-plotted red dashed line is smoothed curve with a window of 15 points. The second
1373
+ panel of the first column shows the detrended curve, and the wavelet transform is applied to this detrended curve. The wavelet power map is
1374
+ displayed in the third panel with 95% significance (i.e., white contours). The power is mainly concentrated around ∼03 minutes. Finally, in
1375
+ the last panel of first column, the global wavelet power is displayed which again shows that global power peaks around ∼ 03 minutes (i.e., 2.78
1376
+ minutes). A similar analysis is shown for B2 (second column), B3 (third column), and B4 (fourth column), and the dominant period is ∼ 03
1377
+ minutes. While we did not find any significant period in B4.
1378
+
1379
+ 16
1380
+ Mishra et al.
1381
+ flows and multi-thermal plasma) indicate that the magnetic reconnection (primary) takes place around the knot of inverse γ-shape
1382
+ flux-rope which triggers the jet.
1383
+ Soon after the primary magnetic reconnection, the northern leg of the inverse γ-shape flux-rope completely erupts, and further,
1384
+ the jet has developed along only the southern leg. Interestingly, we have seen the multiple bright regions (with time) within the
1385
+ jet. Here, we have clearly seen the multiple bright spikes in the time-distance diagram estimated as per the slit (i.e., S1) along the
1386
+ blowout jet. Similarly, the time-distance diagrams estimated as per the slits (i.e., P2, P3, and P3) across the blowout jet show the
1387
+ multiple bright dots (cf.,(section 3.3)). It is trivial to understand that these multiple spikes (along the jet) or multiple bright dots
1388
+ (across the jet) are forming due to multiple enhancement in the intensity with time. Most probably, this multiple enhancements
1389
+ in the intensity supports the multiple magnetic reconnection scenario (Morton et al. 2012; Li et al. 2015; Kumar et al. 2017).
1390
+ Spectroscopic observations reveal a periodic enhancement in the line width of Si iv 1393.77 Å (cf., Figure 6 and 7). For the
1391
+ first time, the periodic enhancement of Si iv line width is being reported in this blowout jet event. On top of these crucial
1392
+ observational findings, we have seen that Si iv profiles are blue-shifted (upflows) when they are very broad (i.e., high line width).
1393
+ And, gradually, the profiles become narrower while they are moving toward the red-shifts (down flows). The periodic existence
1394
+ of such broadened blue-shifted Si iv profiles is most probably due to the occurrence of multiple magnetic reconnection in this
1395
+ blowout jet. Most importantly, our observations also reveal very complex and explosive type profiles of some prominent spectral
1396
+ lines (i.e., Si iv, C ii, and Mg ii) of the solar interface-region (cf., Figure 5). As we know that such complex & explosive type
1397
+ profiles are produced only due to the magnetic reconnection (Peter et al. 2014; Innes et al. 2015; Huang et al. 2017; Young et al.
1398
+ 2018; Chitta & Lazarian 2020), all the observational findings indicate the occurrence of multiple magnetic reconnection.
1399
+ QPPs in the solar/stellar flares is an often phenomenon that occurs with few seconds to few minutes of oscillations pe-
1400
+ riod. Several reports discuss the triggering and related dynamics of QPPs in the solar atmosphere (e.g., Chen & Priest 2006;
1401
+ Inglis & Nakariakov 2009; Nakariakov & Melnikov 2009; Van Doorsselaere et al. 2016; Li et al. 2017; Nakariakov et al. 2018;
1402
+ McLaughlin et al. 2018; Kashapova et al. 2020; Shi et al. 2022; Zhou et al. 2022). The statistical studies of the intense solar
1403
+ flares suggest that the occurrence rate of QPPs reaches 30-80 % with intense flares lying above the M5 class (Sim˜oes et al. 2015).
1404
+ However, the QPPs occurrence rate reduces with the low intense solar flares (Zimovets et al. 2021). Using GOES X-ray data
1405
+ from 2011 to 2018, (Hayes et al. 2020) performed the statistical analysis for QPPs and their association with the different classes
1406
+ of solar flares. The authors claimed that the ≈46% of X-class and ≈29% of M-class flares show QPPs signature. However,
1407
+ only ≈9% of C-class flares exhibit QPPs signature. On the other hand, there are few reported observations of QPPs in jets
1408
+ (Morton et al. 2012; Zhang & Ji 2014; Shen et al. 2018). Interestingly, in the present work, the wavelet analysis of light curves
1409
+ from five different boxes in various AIA filters clearly demonstrates the existence of QPPs in the present blowout jet (section 3.6).
1410
+ The triggering mechanisms of QPPs are very crucial, and so far, more than 15 mechanisms have been proposed to under-
1411
+ stand the initiation mechanism of the QPPs (Nakariakov & Melnikov 2009; Van Doorsselaere et al. 2016; Zimovets et al. 2021).
1412
+ Broadly, these triggering mechanisms of QPP may be classified into two categories, namely, periodic spontaneous magnetic re-
1413
+ connection (Kliem et al. 2000; Karlick´y et al. 2005; Murray et al. 2009; Morton et al. 2012; Li et al. 2015; McLaughlin et al.
1414
+ 2018) and the MHD waves that may induce the periodic magnetic reconnection (e.g., Ning et al. 2004; Foullon et al.
1415
+ 2005; Nakariakov & Melnikov 2006; Nakariakov & Zimovets 2011; Tian et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2016; Kumar et al. 2016;
1416
+ Zimovets et al. 2021). Ning et al. (2004) found recurring explosive events with a period of 3–5 minutes when the compressible
1417
+ waves push the oppositely directed field lines to reconnect. This process leads to multiple magnetic reconnection, and the QPPs
1418
+ were triggered by multiple magnetic reconnection (i.e., recurring explosive events). The other wave modes (e.g., fast mode MHD
1419
+ waves and global kink mode) may also trigger the periodic magnetic reconnection in a coronal loop that is situated near the
1420
+ flaring region. It initiates QPPs with a period of several minutes (e.g., Foullon et al. (2005); Nakariakov & Melnikov (2006)).
1421
+ In the present work, the detected QPPs from various intensity light curves in the blowout jet have a period of ∼ 03 minutes
1422
+ (section 3.6). The extracted EM from the blowout jet in the temperature range of 0.5–15 MK also shows the temporal variations
1423
+ on a time-scale of ∼ 03 minutes (section 3.4; Figure 4). Apart from the intensity and EM curves, the line-width of Si iv is also
1424
+ fluctuating on a time scale of approximately 03 minutes (section 3.5). Hence, consistently, we have found the fluctuations at a
1425
+ time scale of ∼ 03 minutes in various parameters (e.g., intensity, EM, and line width). Here, we would like to mention that this
1426
+ blowout jet triggers within an active region (AR). The umbra of the sunspot (i.e., photospheric and chromospheric atmosphere
1427
+ of AR) is filled with the 3-minute slow MHD waves (e.g.,Fleck & Schmitz 1991; Tian et al. 2014; Jess et al. 2012; Chae et al.
1428
+ 2017; Felipe 2019, 2021; Botha et al. 2011; Farris & McAteer 2020; Kayshap et al. 2021). Hence, we conjecture that 03-minute
1429
+ oscillations are present within the triggering site of the blowout jet, and they may drive the periodic magnetic reconnection at
1430
+ time-scale of ∼ 03 minutes. Hence, most probably, we can say that the periodic magnetic reconnection produces the observed
1431
+
1432
+ QPP in Kink Unstable Jet
1433
+ 17
1434
+ periodic fluctuations (i.e., QPPs) in the intensity, EM, and line width.
1435
+ It should be noted that the magnetic reconnection between pre-existing and open coronal field and closed magnetic fields
1436
+ can produce a collimated jet without the rotation or twist, i.e., a kind of standard jet (e.g., Yokoyama & Shibata 1996;
1437
+ Miyagoshi & Yokoyama 2003; Moreno-Insertis et al. 2008; Moore et al. 2010; Liu et al. 2011; Moreno-Insertis & Galsgaard
1438
+ 2013; Raouafi et al. 2016; Shen 2021). On the other hand, the magnetic reconnection between the pre-existing open coronal
1439
+ magnetic field and the twisted closed magnetic fields can produce newly twisted magnetic field lines which undergo the untwist-
1440
+ ing motions (e.g., Fang et al. 2014). The plasma flows along the newly twisted magnetic field lines that form the solar jet, and
1441
+ the rotational/helical motion of the solar jets is a result of untwisting motion of these newly twisted magnetic field lines. Hence,
1442
+ the magnetic reconnection is an important physical process to trigger the solar jets in the solar atmosphere (Shibata et al. 1992;
1443
+ Yokoyama & Shibata 1995; Shimojo et al. 1996, 1998; Shibata et al. 2007; Kayshap et al. 2013; Sterling et al. 2015; Tian et al.
1444
+ 2014; Jel´ınek et al. 2015; Wyper et al. 2017; Kayshap et al. 2018; Srivastava et al. 2021). That is why this physical process
1445
+ (i.e., magnetic reconnection) is an integral feature of various 2.5D and 3D models of the solar jets (Yokoyama & Shibata 1996;
1446
+ Nishizuka et al. 2008; Moreno-Insertis et al. 2008; Gontikakis et al. 2009; Pariat et al. 2015, 2016). The present blowout jet
1447
+ shows a very strong rotation of the plasma column (see attached animation 1.mp4). The helical or rotational motions of the solar
1448
+ jets are an important indication of the kink instability (e.g., Shibata et al. 1996; Raouafi et al. 2016; Shen 2021). The numerical
1449
+ simulations have shown that destabilization of the system by global kink-instability (when helicity or twist exceeded the critical
1450
+ value) can trigger the magnetic reconnection through the separatrix surface, and the magnetic reconnection drives the helical
1451
+ solar jets (e.g., Pariat et al. 2009, 2010; Rachmeler et al. 2010; Pariat et al. 2015). Most of the magnetic field is either open or
1452
+ long curvature magnetic field in the vicinity of the blowout jet (see panels (c1), and (d1) of Figure 2). Here, we mention that
1453
+ kink instability destabilizes the pre-existing coronal magnetic field configuration through either magnetic reconnection between
1454
+ the kinked flux rope (i.e., kinked/erupting loops) and the pre-existing coronal fields or the internal magnetic reconnection within
1455
+ the kink unstable flux rope. Hence, due to the magnetic reconnection, the plasma flows along reconnected magnetic field lines
1456
+ which collectively form the spire of the blowout jet. This blowout jet is mainly visible in the cool-temperature filters, and the
1457
+ signature of this blowout jet is faint in the hot-temperature filters (see section 3.2). However, usually, the blowout jets have strong
1458
+ emissions at hot temperatures along with strong emissions at cool temperatures (e.g.,Moore et al. 2010, 2013). Here, it should
1459
+ be noted that surges emit mainly at the cool temperature. Therefore, in the present observational baseline, we don’t rule out the
1460
+ possibility of this jet being an chromospheric surge. However, the emission measure (EM) in high-temperature wavebands also
1461
+ shows some hot plasma emission (4-6 MK) from the spire of this jet. Therefore, this manuscript uses this feature as a blowout
1462
+ jet.
1463
+ Hence, kink-instability is an possibly an important driver of solar jets, and not only in the solar jets, but the kink-instability also
1464
+ plays crucial role in the triggering of the large-scale eruptions of the solar atmosphere (T¨or¨ok et al. 2004; T¨or¨ok & Kliem 2005;
1465
+ Srivastava et al. 2010, 2013; Kumar et al. 2012; Zhong et al. 2021). In case of observations related to the kinked solar flux-rope
1466
+ in the solar jets, Kayshap et al. (2013) have reported a kinked flux-tube that drives a solar jet, i.e., internal magnetic reconnection
1467
+ in the kinked flux-tube at the north polar triggers the polar jet. Further, Zhu et al. (2017) have also shown that kink instability
1468
+ triggers a blowout jet in the solar atmosphere. The present observation clearly shows the occurrence of the kinked flux rope at the
1469
+ west limb prior to the jet formation. Further, the imaging, as well as spectroscopic observations, confirms the multiple magnetic
1470
+ reconnection in support of the formation of this solar blowout jet.
1471
+ Hence, in conclusion, we say that the present observational baseline shows the inverse γ-shape, rotational or helical motion,
1472
+ and multiple magnetic reconnection in this blowout jet event. Most probably, these observational findings collectively indicate
1473
+ that the kink-instability triggers this blowout jet, and multiple magnetic reconnection leads to the formation of QPPs in this jet.
1474
+ 5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
1475
+ S. K. Mishra acknowledges the Indian Institute of Astrophysics (IIA, Bangalore) for providing the computational facilities
1476
+ and institute fellowship. K. Sangal would like to acknowledge the Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), Govern-
1477
+ ment of India, for financial support through a Senior Research Fellowship (UGC-SRF). P. Jel´ınek acknowledges support from
1478
+ grant 21-16508J of the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic. A. K. Srivastava acknowledges the ISRO Project Grant (DS 2B-
1479
+ 13012(2)/26/2022-Sec.2)for the support of his research. S.P. Rajaguru acknowledges support from SERB (Govt of India) research
1480
+ grant CRG/2019/003786. We acknowledge the use of (Hannah & Kontar 2012) for calculating the differential emission measure
1481
+ (DEM). Data courtesy of SDO/AIA and IRIS science team. We also acknowledge the use of (Torrence & Compo 1998) method
1482
+ to extract the wavelet power spectra and average period of QPPs.
1483
+
1484
+ 18
1485
+ Mishra et al.
1486
+ REFERENCES
1487
+ Antolin, P., Pagano, P., Testa, P., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5,
1488
+ 54. doi:10.1038/s41550-020-1199-8
1489
+ Archontis, V. & Hood, A. W. 2013, ApJL, 769, L21.
1490
+ doi:10.1088/2041-8205/769/2/L21
1491
+ Aschwanden, M. J. 2004, Physics of the Solar Corona. An
1492
+ Introduction, by M.J. Aschwanden. Published by Praxis
1493
+ Publishing Ltd., Chichester, UK, and Springer-Verlag Berlin
1494
+ ISBN..3-540-22321-5, 2004.
1495
+ Bahauddin, S. M., Bradshaw, S. J., & Winebarger, A. R. 2021,
1496
+ Nature Astronomy, 5, 237. doi:10.1038/s41550-020-01263-2
1497
+ Botha, G. J. J., Arber, T. D., Nakariakov, V. M., et al. 2011, ApJ,
1498
+ 728, 84. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/728/2/84
1499
+ Canfield, R. C., Reardon, K. P., Leka, K. D., et al. 1996, ApJ, 464,
1500
+ 1016. doi:10.1086/177389
1501
+ Chae, J., Lee, J., Cho, K., et al. 2017, ApJ, 836, 18.
1502
+ doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/18
1503
+ Chen, P. F. & Priest, E. R. 2006, SoPh, 238, 313.
1504
+ doi:10.1007/s11207-006-0215-1
1505
+ Chitta, L. P. & Lazarian, A. 2020, ApJL, 890, L2.
1506
+ doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab6f0a
1507
+ Cirtain, J. W., Golub, L., Lundquist, L., et al. 2007, Science, 318,
1508
+ 1580. doi:10.1126/science.1147050
1509
+ De Pontieu, B., Title, A. M., Lemen, J. R., et al. 2014, SoPh, 289,
1510
+ 2733. doi:10.1007/s11207-014-0485-y
1511
+ De Pontieu, B., Polito, V., Hansteen, V., et al. 2021, SoPh, 296, 84.
1512
+ doi:10.1007/s11207-021-01826-0
1513
+ Fang, F., Fan, Y., & McIntosh, S. W. 2014, ApJL, 789, L19.
1514
+ doi:10.1088/2041-8205/789/1/L19
1515
+ Farris, L. & McAteer, R. T. J. 2020, ApJ, 903, 19.
1516
+ doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb701
1517
+ Felipe, T. 2019, A&A, 627, A169.
1518
+ doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935784
1519
+ Filippov, B., Srivastava, A. K., Dwivedi, B. N., et al. 2015,
1520
+ MNRAS, 451, 1117. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1039
1521
+ Fleck, B. & Schmitz, F. 1991, A&A, 250, 235
1522
+ Felipe, T. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 2.
1523
+ doi:10.1038/s41550-020-1157-5
1524
+ Felipe, T., Khomenko, E., & Collados, M. 2010, ApJ, 719, 357.
1525
+ doi:10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/357
1526
+ Foullon, C., Verwichte, E., Nakariakov, V. M., et al. 2005, A&A,
1527
+ 440, L59. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200500169
1528
+ Gontikakis, C., Archontis, V., & Tsinganos, K. 2009, A&A, 506,
1529
+ L45. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913026
1530
+ Guglielmino, S. L., Young, P. R., & Zuccarello, F. 2019, ApJ, 871,
1531
+ 82. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf79d
1532
+ Hayes, L. A., Inglis, A. R., Christe, S., et al. 2020, ApJ, 895, 50.
1533
+ doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8d40
1534
+ Hassanin, A. & Kliem, B. 2016, ApJ, 832, 106.
1535
+ doi:10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/106
1536
+ Hannah, I. G. & Kontar, E. P. 2012, A&A, 539, A146.
1537
+ doi:10.1051/0004-6361/2011175762.
1538
+ Harrison, R. A., Bryans, P., & Bingham, R. 2001, A&A, 379, 324.
1539
+ doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011171
1540
+ Hood, A. W. & Priest, E. R. 1981, Geophysical and Astrophysical
1541
+ Fluid Dynamics, 17, 297. doi:10.1080/03091928108243687
1542
+ Hong, J.-C., Jiang, Y.-C., Yang, J.-Y., et al. 2013, Research in
1543
+ Astronomy and Astrophysics, 13, 253.
1544
+ doi:10.1088/1674-4527/13/3/001
1545
+ Huang, Z., Madjarska, M. S., Xia, L., et al. 2014, ApJ, 797, 88.
1546
+ doi:10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/88
1547
+ Huang, Z., Madjarska, M. S., Scullion, E. M., et al. 2017, MNRAS,
1548
+ 464, 1753. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2469
1549
+ Inglis, A. R. & Nakariakov, V. M. 2009, A&A, 493, 259.
1550
+ doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810473
1551
+ Innes, D. E., Inhester, B., Axford, W. I., et al. 1997, Nature, 386,
1552
+ 811
1553
+ Innes, D. E., Guo, L.-J., Huang, Y.-M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 813, 86.
1554
+ doi:10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/86
1555
+ Jess, D. B., De Moortel, I., Mathioudakis, M., et al. 2012, ApJ,
1556
+ 757, 160. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/757/2/160
1557
+ Jel´ınek, P., Srivastava, A. K., Murawski, K., et al. 2015, A&A, 581,
1558
+ A131. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424234
1559
+ Jibben, P. & Canfield, R. C. 2004, ApJ, 610, 1129.
1560
+ doi:10.1086/421727
1561
+ Karlick´y, M., B´arta, M., M´esz´arosov´a, H., et al. 2005, A&A, 432,
1562
+ 705. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041551
1563
+ Kamio, S., Curdt, W., Teriaca, L., et al. 2010, A&A, 510, L1.
1564
+ doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913269
1565
+ Kashapova, L. K., Kupriyanova, E. G., Xu, Z., et al. 2020, A&A,
1566
+ 642, A195. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833947
1567
+ Kayshap, P., Srivastava, A. K., Murawski, K., et al. 2013, ApJL,
1568
+ 770, L3. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/770/1/L3
1569
+ Kayshap, P., Srivastava, A. K., & Murawski, K. 2013, ApJ, 763,
1570
+ 24. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/763/1/24
1571
+ Kayshap, P., Murawski, K., Srivastava, A. K., et al. 2018, A&A,
1572
+ 616, A99. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730990
1573
+ Kayshap, P., Singh Payal, R., Tripathi, S. C., et al. 2021, MNRAS,
1574
+ 505, 5311. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1663
1575
+ Kayshap, P., Tripathi, D., & Jel´ınek, P. 2021, ApJ, 906, 121.
1576
+ doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abcc6f
1577
+ Kliem, B., Karlick´y, M., & Benz, A. O. 2000, A&A, 360, 715
1578
+ Kumar, P., Cho, K.-S., Bong, S.-C., et al. 2012, ApJ, 746, 67.
1579
+ doi:10.1088/0004-637X/746/1/67
1580
+ Kumar, P., Nakariakov, V. M., & Cho, K.-S. 2016, ApJ, 822, 7.
1581
+ doi:10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/7
1582
+ Kumar, P., Nakariakov, V. M., & Cho, K.-S. 2017, ApJ, 836, 121.
1583
+ doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/121
1584
+
1585
+ QPP in Kink Unstable Jet
1586
+ 19
1587
+ Kruskal, M. D. & Kulsrud, R. M. 1958, Physics of Fluids, 1, 265.
1588
+ doi:10.1063/1.1705884
1589
+ Lemen, J. R., Title, A. M., Akin, D. J., et al. 2012, SoPh, 275, 17.
1590
+ doi:10.1007/s11207-011-9776-8
1591
+ Li, D., Ning, Z. J., & Zhang, Q. M. 2015, ApJ, 807, 72.
1592
+ doi:10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/72
1593
+ Li, D., Zhang, Q. M., Huang, Y., et al. 2017, A&A, 597, L4.
1594
+ doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629867
1595
+ Liu, J., Wang, Y., & Erd´elyi, R. 2019, Frontiers in Astronomy and
1596
+ Space Sciences, 6, 44. doi:10.3389/fspas.2019.00044
1597
+ Liu, C., Deng, N., Liu, R., et al. 2011, ApJL, 735, L18.
1598
+ doi:10.1088/2041-8205/735/1/L18
1599
+ Matsui, Y., Yokoyama, T., Kitagawa, N., et al. 2012, ApJ, 759, 15.
1600
+ doi:10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/15
1601
+ McLaughlin, J. A., Nakariakov, V. M., Dominique, M., et al. 2018,
1602
+ SSRv, 214, 45. doi:10.1007/s11214-018-0478-5
1603
+ Mishra, S. K., Singh, T., Kayshap, P., et al. 2018, ApJ, 856, 86.
1604
+ doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaae03
1605
+ Mishra, S. K. & Srivastava, A. K. 2019, ApJ, 874, 57.
1606
+ doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab06f2
1607
+ Mishra, S. K., Singh, B., Srivastava, A. K., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923,
1608
+ 72. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2a43
1609
+ Miyagoshi, T. & Yokoyama, T. 2003, ApJL, 593, L133.
1610
+ doi:10.1086/378215
1611
+ Moreno-Insertis, F., Galsgaard, K., & Ugarte-Urra, I. 2008, ApJL,
1612
+ 673, L211. doi:10.1086/527560
1613
+ Moreno-Insertis, F. & Galsgaard, K. 2013, ApJ, 771, 20.
1614
+ doi:10.1088/0004-637X/771/1/20
1615
+ Moore, R. L., Cirtain, J. W., Sterling, A. C., et al. 2010, ApJ, 720,
1616
+ 757. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/720/1/757
1617
+ Moore, R. L., Sterling, A. C., Falconer, D. A., et al. 2013, ApJ,
1618
+ 769, 134. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/769/2/134
1619
+ Morton, R. J., Srivastava, A. K., & Erd´elyi, R. 2012, A&A, 542,
1620
+ A70. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117218
1621
+ Mulay, S. M., Del Zanna, G., & Mason, H. 2017, A&A, 598, A11.
1622
+ doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628796
1623
+ Murray, M. J., van Driel-Gesztelyi, L., & Baker, D. 2009, A&A,
1624
+ 494, 329. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810406
1625
+ Nakariakov, V. M. & Melnikov, V. F. 2006, A&A, 446, 1151.
1626
+ doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053944
1627
+ Nakariakov, V. M. & Melnikov, V. F. 2009, SSRv, 149, 119.
1628
+ doi:10.1007/s11214-009-9536-3
1629
+ Nakariakov, V. M., Inglis, A. R., Zimovets, I. V., et al. 2010,
1630
+ Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 52, 124009.
1631
+ doi:10.1088/0741-3335/52/12/124009.
1632
+ Nakariakov, V. M. & Zimovets, I. V. 2011, ApJL, 730, L27.
1633
+ doi:10.1088/2041-8205/730/2/L27
1634
+ Nakariakov, V. M., Pilipenko, V., Heilig, B., et al. 2016, SSRv,
1635
+ 200, 75. doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0233-0
1636
+ Nakariakov, V. M., Anfinogentov, S., Storozhenko, A. A., et al.
1637
+ 2018, ApJ, 859, 154. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabfb9
1638
+ Ni, L., Zhang, Q.-M., Murphy, N. A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 841, 27.
1639
+ doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6ffe
1640
+ Ning, Z., Innes, D. E., & Solanki, S. K. 2004, A&A, 419, 1141.
1641
+ doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034499
1642
+ Nishizuka, N., Shimizu, M., Nakamura, T., et al. 2008, ApJL, 683,
1643
+ L83. doi:10.1086/591445
1644
+ N´obrega-Siverio, D., Mart´ınez-Sykora, J., Moreno-Insertis, F., et
1645
+ al. 2017, ApJ, 850, 153. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa956
1646
+ N´obrega-Siverio, D., Moreno-Insertis, F., & Mart´ınez-Sykora, J.
1647
+ 2018, ApJ, 858, 8. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab9b9
1648
+ N´obrega-Siverio, D., Moreno-Insertis, F., & Mart´ınez-Sykora, J.
1649
+ 2016, ApJ, 822, 18. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/18
1650
+ Pariat, E., Antiochos, S. K., & DeVore, C. R. 2009, ApJ, 691, 61.
1651
+ doi:10.1088/0004-637X/691/1/61
1652
+ Pariat, E., Antiochos, S. K., & DeVore, C. R. 2010, ApJ, 714,
1653
+ 1762. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1762
1654
+ Pariat, E., Dalmasse, K., DeVore, C. R., et al. 2016, A&A, 596,
1655
+ A36. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629109
1656
+ Pariat, E., Dalmasse, K., DeVore, C. R., et al. 2015, A&A, 573,
1657
+ A130. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424209
1658
+ Peter, H., Tian, H., Curdt, W., et al. 2014, Science, 346, 1255726.
1659
+ doi:10.1126/science.1255726
1660
+ Rachmeler, L. A., Pariat, E., DeForest, C. E., et al. 2010, ApJ, 715,
1661
+ 1556. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/715/2/1556
1662
+ Raouafi, N.-E., Georgoulis, M. K., Rust, D. M., et al. 2010, ApJ,
1663
+ 718, 981. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/718/2/981
1664
+ Raouafi, N. E., Patsourakos, S., Pariat, E., et al. 2016, SSRv, 201,
1665
+ 1. doi:10.1007/s11214-016-0260-5
1666
+ Schmieder, B., Shibata, K., van Driel-Gesztelyi, L., et al. 1995,
1667
+ SoPh, 156, 245. doi:10.1007/BF00670226
1668
+ Shen, Y., Liu, Y. D., Su, J., et al. 2017, ApJ, 851, 67.
1669
+ doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9a48
1670
+ Shen, Y., Tang, Z., Li, H., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 480, L63.
1671
+ doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly127
1672
+ Shen, Y. 2021, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series
1673
+ A, 477, 217. doi:10.1098/rspa.2020.0217
1674
+ Shi, F., Li, D., & Ning, Z. 2022, Universe, 8, 104.
1675
+ doi:10.3390/universe8020104
1676
+ Shibata, K. & Uchida, Y. 1986, SoPh, 103, 299.
1677
+ doi:10.1007/BF00147831
1678
+ Shibata, K., Ishido, Y., Acton, L. W., et al. 1992, PASJ, 44, L173
1679
+ Shibata, K., Yokoyama, T., & Shimojo, M. 1996, Advances in
1680
+ Space Research, 17, 197. doi:10.1016/0273-1177(95)00567-X
1681
+ Shibata, K., Nakamura, T., Matsumoto, T., et al. 2007, Science,
1682
+ 318, 1591. doi:10.1126/science.1146708
1683
+ Shimojo, M., Hashimoto, S., Shibata, K., et al. 1996, PASJ, 48,
1684
+ 123. doi:10.1093/pasj/48.1.123
1685
+
1686
+ 20
1687
+ Mishra et al.
1688
+ Shimojo, M., Shibata, K., & Harvey, K. L. 1998, SoPh, 178, 379.
1689
+ doi:10.1023/A:1005091905214
1690
+ Shimojo, M., Shibata, K., Yokoyama, T., et al. 2001, ApJ, 550,
1691
+ 1051. doi:10.1086/319788
1692
+ Sim˜oes, P. J. A., Hudson, H. S., & Fletcher, L. 2015, SoPh, 290,
1693
+ 3625. doi:10.1007/s11207-015-0691-2
1694
+ Srivastava, A. K., Zaqarashvili, T. V., Kumar, P., et al. 2010, ApJ,
1695
+ 715, 292. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/715/1/292
1696
+ Srivastava, A. K. & Murawski, K. 2011, A&A, 534, A62.
1697
+ doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117359
1698
+ Srivastava, A. K., Erd´elyi, R., Tripathi, D., et al. 2013, ApJL, 765,
1699
+ L42. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/765/2/L42
1700
+ Srivastava, A. K., Murawski, K., Ku´zma, B., et al. 2018, Nature
1701
+ Astronomy, 2, 951. doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0590-1
1702
+ Srivastava, A. K., Mishra, S. K., Jel´ınek, P., et al. 2019, ApJ, 887,
1703
+ 137
1704
+ Srivastava, A. K., Mishra, S. K., & Jel´ınek, P. 2021, ApJ, 920, 18.
1705
+ doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1519
1706
+ Sterling, A. C. 2000, SoPh, 196, 79.
1707
+ doi:10.1023/A:1005213923962
1708
+ Sterling, A. C., Chifor, C., Mason, H. E., et al. 2010, A&A, 521,
1709
+ A49. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014006
1710
+ Sterling, A. C., Moore, R. L., Falconer, D. A., et al. 2015, Nature,
1711
+ 523, 437. doi:10.1038/nature14556
1712
+ Tian, H., DeLuca, E. E., Cranmer, S. R., et al. 2014, Science, 346,
1713
+ 1255711. doi:10.1126/science.1255711
1714
+ Tian, H., Young, P. R., Reeves, K. K., et al. 2016, ApJL, 823, L16.
1715
+ doi:10.3847/2041-8205/823/1/L16
1716
+ Tian, H., DeLuca, E., Reeves, K. K., et al. 2014, ApJ, 786, 137.
1717
+ doi:10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/137
1718
+ Tiwari, S. K., Moore, R. L., Winebarger, A. R., et al. 2016, ApJ,
1719
+ 816, 92. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/816/2/92
1720
+ Torrence, C. & Compo, G. P. 1998, Bulletin of the American
1721
+ Meteorological Society, 79, 61.
1722
+ doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0061:APGTWA>2.0.CO;2
1723
+ T¨or¨ok, T., Kliem, B., & Titov, V. S. 2004, A&A, 413, L27.
1724
+ doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031691
1725
+ T¨or¨ok, T. & Kliem, B. 2005, ApJL, 630, L97. doi:10.1086/462412
1726
+ T¨or¨ok, T., Berger, M. A., & Kliem, B. 2010, A&A, 516, A49.
1727
+ doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913578
1728
+ T¨or¨ok, T., Kliem, B., Berger, M. A., et al. 2014, Plasma Physics
1729
+ and Controlled Fusion, 56, 064012.
1730
+ doi:10.1088/0741-3335/56/6/064012
1731
+ Tziotziou, K., Tsiropoula, G., & S¨utterlin, P. 2005, A&A, 444, 265.
1732
+ doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053604
1733
+ Van Doorsselaere, T., Kupriyanova, E. G., & Yuan, D. 2016, SoPh,
1734
+ 291, 3143. doi:10.1007/s11207-016-0977-z
1735
+ Wyper, P. F., Antiochos, S. K., & DeVore, C. R. 2017, Nature, 544,
1736
+ 452. doi:10.1038/nature22050.
1737
+ Wyper, P. F., DeVore, C. R., & Antiochos, S. K. 2018, ApJ, 852,
1738
+ 98. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9ffc
1739
+ Yang, S., Zhang, Q., Xu, Z., et al. 2020, ApJ, 898, 101.
1740
+ doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9ac7
1741
+ Young, P. R. 2015, ApJ, 801, 124.
1742
+ doi:10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/124
1743
+ Young, P. R., Keenan, F. P., Milligan, R. O., et al. 2018, ApJ, 857,
1744
+ 5. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab556
1745
+ Yokoyama, T. & Shibata, K. 1995, Nature, 375, 42.
1746
+ doi:10.1038/375042a0
1747
+ Yokoyama, T. & Shibata, K. 1996, PASJ, 48, 353.
1748
+ doi:10.1093/pasj/48.2.353
1749
+ Zaqarashvili, T. V., Lomineishvili, S., Leitner, P., et al. 2021, A&A,
1750
+ 649, A179. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039381
1751
+ Zhang, Q. M. & Ji, H. S. 2014, A&A, 561, A134.
1752
+ doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322616
1753
+ Zhang, Q. M. & Ji, H. S. 2014, A&A, 567, A11.
1754
+ doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423698
1755
+ Zhang, Q. M., Li, D., & Ning, Z. J. 2016, ApJ, 832, 65.
1756
+ doi:10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/65
1757
+ Zhang, Q. M. & Ni, L. 2019, ApJ, 870, 113.
1758
+ doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf391
1759
+ Zhelyazkov, I. 2012, A&A, 537, A124.
1760
+ doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117780.
1761
+ Zhou, X., Shen, Y., Liu, Y. D., et al. 2022, ApJL, 930, L5.
1762
+ doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac651e
1763
+ Zhong, Z., Guo, Y., & Ding, M. D. 2021, Nature Communications,
1764
+ 12, 2734. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23037-8.
1765
+ Zhu, X., Wang, H., Cheng, X., et al. 2017, ApJL, 844, L20.
1766
+ doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa8033
1767
+ Zimovets, I. V., McLaughlin, J. A., Srivastava, A. K., et al. 2021,
1768
+ SSRv, 217, 66. doi:10.1007/s11214-021-00840-9
1769
+
1770
+ QPP in Kink Unstable Jet
1771
+ 21
1772
+ APPENDIX
1773
+ A. TEMPORAL EVOLUTION OF JET IN IRIS/SJI 1330 Å FILTER
1774
+ We have shown the evolution of the jet in IRIS/SJI 1330 Å filter observations (cf., figure A.1). At time t = 06:29 UT, we have
1775
+ seen the activation of the flux rope at the west limb of the Sun (panel a). Further, we have seen the formation of the bright knots
1776
+ that are most probably forming due to the magnetic reconnection (panel d), and this magnetic reconnection triggers the jet (panel
1777
+ d). The magnetic reconnection happens in the vicinity of bright knots, therefore, below the bright knots, the plasma falls back
1778
+ towards the limb (downflows) along both legs (indicated by red arrows in panel f). While above the bright knot the plasma flows
1779
+ upward as indicated by the blue arrow in panel (f). Around t = 06:33 UT, the northern leg of the jet erupts completely (panels
1780
+ h), and further, the jet evolves around the southern leg (panels h and i). In the later phase of the jet, we have seen that most
1781
+ of the plasma falls back towards the solar surface. The evolution and dynamics of the jet in this filter (i.e., IRIS/SJI 1330 Å)
1782
+ are very similar as we have already seen in the AIA 304 Å filter (cf., figure 1). The dynamics and evolution of this jet with
1783
+ the help of AIA 304 Å filter in the main text. Similar to AIA 304 Å filter, we have tracked a plasma thread that shows rotation
1784
+ with time (see curved white arrows from panels d to f). A similar evolution of this jet can be seen in the given animations (i.e.,
1785
+ animation 1.mp4–with annotation and animation 2.mp4–without annotation). The real-time duration of IRIS animations is 23
1786
+ seconds. Here, it should be noted that IRIS observations are rotated by a roll angle of 90◦, and we have provided the direction
1787
+ arrows in the first panel of figure A.1.
1788
+ B. QUASI PERIODIC PULSATIONS: AIA 171 Å, AIA 211 Å, AND AIA 131 Å
1789
+ In this appendix, we have shown the wavelet analysis for AIA 171 Å (Figure B.1), AIA 131 Å (Figure B.2), and AIA 211 Å
1790
+ (Figure B.3). We have shown wavelet power maps from all four boxes in the same fashion as we have described in section 3.6.
1791
+ Interestingly, the QPPs in these hot EUV wavebands of SDO/AIA also show a similar period as we found for AIA 304 Å
1792
+ (section 3.6).
1793
+
1794
+ 22
1795
+ Mishra et al.
1796
+ 70
1797
+ 80
1798
+ 90
1799
+ 100
1800
+ 110
1801
+ 120
1802
+ 130
1803
+ Y (arcsec)
1804
+ 70
1805
+ 80
1806
+ 90
1807
+ 100
1808
+ 110
1809
+ 120
1810
+ 130
1811
+ 06:29:04 UT
1812
+ IRIS/SJI 1330
1813
+ (a)
1814
+ 06:29:42 UT
1815
+ IRIS/SJI 1330
1816
+ (b)
1817
+ 06:30:21 UT
1818
+ IRIS/SJI 1330
1819
+ (c)
1820
+ 70
1821
+ 80
1822
+ 90
1823
+ 100
1824
+ 110
1825
+ 120
1826
+ 130
1827
+ Y (arcsec)
1828
+ 70
1829
+ 80
1830
+ 90
1831
+ 100
1832
+ 110
1833
+ 120
1834
+ 130
1835
+ 06:30:59 UT
1836
+ IRIS/SJI 1330
1837
+ (d)
1838
+ 06:31:17 UT
1839
+ IRIS/SJI 1330
1840
+ (e)
1841
+ 06:32:15 UT
1842
+ IRIS/SJI 1330
1843
+ (f)
1844
+ 970
1845
+ 980
1846
+ 990
1847
+ 1000 1010 1020 1030
1848
+ X (arcsec)
1849
+ 70
1850
+ 80
1851
+ 90
1852
+ 100
1853
+ 110
1854
+ 120
1855
+ 130
1856
+ Y (arcsec)
1857
+ 970
1858
+ 980
1859
+ 990
1860
+ 1000 1010 1020 1030
1861
+ 70
1862
+ 80
1863
+ 90
1864
+ 100
1865
+ 110
1866
+ 120
1867
+ 130
1868
+ 06:32:54 UT
1869
+ IRIS/SJI 1330
1870
+ (g)
1871
+ 970
1872
+ 980
1873
+ 990
1874
+ 1000 1010 1020 1030
1875
+ X (arcsec)
1876
+ 970
1877
+ 980
1878
+ 990
1879
+ 1000 1010 1020 1030
1880
+ 06:33:32 UT
1881
+ IRIS/SJI 1330
1882
+ (h)
1883
+ 970
1884
+ 980
1885
+ 990
1886
+ 1000 1010 1020 1030
1887
+ X (arcsec)
1888
+ 970
1889
+ 980
1890
+ 990
1891
+ 1000 1010 1020 1030
1892
+ 06:34:10 UT
1893
+ IRIS/SJI 1330
1894
+ (i)
1895
+ Triggering of
1896
+ fluxrope
1897
+ N
1898
+ S
1899
+ W
1900
+ E
1901
+ Triggering of
1902
+ fluxrope
1903
+ Bright Knot
1904
+ Bright Knot
1905
+ Northern leg
1906
+ Southern leg
1907
+ Northern leg
1908
+ Southern leg
1909
+ Figure A.1. This figure shows the evolution of the jet in the IRIS/SJI 1330 Å filter. Firstly, we saw the activation of the kinked flux rope (panels
1910
+ b and c), and then the formation of bright knots due to the magnetic reconnection of twisted field lines (panel d). This magnetic reconnection
1911
+ leads downflows along both legs of the jet (see red arrows in panel f) and upflows along the spire of the jet (blue arrow in panel f). Further,
1912
+ after some time, one leg erupts completely (panels g and h), and the jet further develops along the southern leg (panels h and i). We also see the
1913
+ rotation of the plasma as indicated by white arrows from panel (d) to panel (f). At last, we mention that evolution of the jet in IRIS/SJI 1330 Å
1914
+ is similar as we have already seen in AIA 304 Å (cf., figure 1). IRIS animations (i.e., animation 1.mp4–with annotation and animation 2.mp4–
1915
+ without annotation) also show the same evolution of this jet. The IRIS animations start from 06:24:45 UT to 07:00:50 UT having a real time
1916
+ duration of 23 seconds.
1917
+
1918
+ QPP in Kink Unstable Jet
1919
+ 23
1920
+ B1
1921
+ 0.0
1922
+ 0.2
1923
+ 0.4
1924
+ 0.6
1925
+ 0.8
1926
+ 1.0
1927
+ Norm Cnts
1928
+ 0.0
1929
+ 0.2
1930
+ 0.4
1931
+ Norm Cnts
1932
+ 0
1933
+ 5
1934
+ 10
1935
+ 15
1936
+ 20
1937
+ 25
1938
+ Time (Minutes)
1939
+ 0.5
1940
+ 1.0
1941
+ 2.0
1942
+ 4.0
1943
+ 8.0
1944
+ 16.0
1945
+ Period (Minutes)
1946
+ 1
1947
+ 2
1948
+ 4
1949
+ 6
1950
+ 8
1951
+ 10 12 14
1952
+ Power
1953
+ 0.5
1954
+ 1.0
1955
+ 2.0
1956
+ 4.0
1957
+ 8.0
1958
+ 16.0
1959
+ Global Period (Minutes)
1960
+ Global Period at max. power ( 2.78 min.)
1961
+ B2
1962
+ 0
1963
+ 5
1964
+ 10
1965
+ 15
1966
+ 20
1967
+ 25
1968
+ Time (Minutes)
1969
+ 25
1970
+ 25
1971
+ 25
1972
+ 1
1973
+ 2
1974
+ 3
1975
+ 4
1976
+ 5
1977
+ Power
1978
+ Global Period at max. power ( 2.34 min.)
1979
+ B3
1980
+ 0
1981
+ 5
1982
+ 10
1983
+ 15
1984
+ 20
1985
+ 25
1986
+ Time (Minutes)
1987
+ 50
1988
+ 50
1989
+ 2
1990
+ 4
1991
+ 6
1992
+ Power
1993
+ Global Period at max. power ( 2.14 min.)
1994
+ B4
1995
+ 0
1996
+ 5
1997
+ 10
1998
+ 15
1999
+ 20
2000
+ 25
2001
+ Time (Minutes)
2002
+ 50
2003
+ 0.0
2004
+ 3.7
2005
+ 7.4
2006
+ 11.1
2007
+ 14.9
2008
+ 1
2009
+ 2
2010
+ 3
2011
+ 4
2012
+ Power
2013
+ Figure B.1. Same as figure 8 but for AIA 171 Å filter observations.
2014
+
2015
+ 24
2016
+ Mishra et al.
2017
+ B1
2018
+ 0.0
2019
+ 0.2
2020
+ 0.4
2021
+ 0.6
2022
+ 0.8
2023
+ 1.0
2024
+ Norm Cnts
2025
+ -0.2
2026
+ 0.0
2027
+ 0.2
2028
+ 0.4
2029
+ 0.6
2030
+ Norm Cnts
2031
+ 0
2032
+ 5
2033
+ 10
2034
+ 15
2035
+ 20
2036
+ 25
2037
+ Time (Minutes)
2038
+ 0.5
2039
+ 1.0
2040
+ 2.0
2041
+ 4.0
2042
+ 8.0
2043
+ 16.0
2044
+ Period (Minutes)
2045
+ 1
2046
+ 2
2047
+ 4
2048
+ 6
2049
+ 8
2050
+ 10 12 14
2051
+ Power
2052
+ 0.5
2053
+ 1.0
2054
+ 2.0
2055
+ 4.0
2056
+ 8.0
2057
+ 16.0
2058
+ Global Period (Minutes)
2059
+ Global Period at max. power ( 2.78 min.)
2060
+ B2
2061
+ 0
2062
+ 5
2063
+ 10
2064
+ 15
2065
+ 20
2066
+ 25
2067
+ Time (Minutes)
2068
+ Ł˘��UMGRAY
2069
+ Ł˘��UMGRAY
2070
+ 1
2071
+ 2
2072
+ 3
2073
+ 4
2074
+ 5
2075
+ 6
2076
+ Power
2077
+ Global Period at max. power ( 2.34 min.)
2078
+ B3
2079
+ 0
2080
+ 5
2081
+ 10
2082
+ 15
2083
+ 20
2084
+ 25
2085
+ Time (Minutes)
2086
+ ‚‚W�GRAY
2087
+ ‚‚W�GRAY
2088
+ ‚‚W�GRAY
2089
+ 1
2090
+ 2
2091
+ 3
2092
+ 4
2093
+ 5
2094
+ 6
2095
+ 7
2096
+ Power
2097
+ Global Period at max. power ( 2.14 min.)
2098
+ B4
2099
+ 0
2100
+ 5
2101
+ 10
2102
+ 15
2103
+ 20
2104
+ 25
2105
+ Time (Minutes)
2106
+ Ł˘��UMGRAY
2107
+ 0.0
2108
+ 3.7
2109
+ 7.4
2110
+ 11.1
2111
+ 14.9
2112
+ 1
2113
+ 2
2114
+ 3
2115
+ 4
2116
+ Power
2117
+ Figure B.2. Same as figure 8 but for AIA 131 Å filter observations.
2118
+
2119
+ QPP in Kink Unstable Jet
2120
+ 25
2121
+ B1
2122
+ 0.0
2123
+ 0.2
2124
+ 0.4
2125
+ 0.6
2126
+ 0.8
2127
+ 1.0
2128
+ Norm Cnts
2129
+ -0.1
2130
+ 0.0
2131
+ 0.1
2132
+ 0.2
2133
+ 0.3
2134
+ 0.4
2135
+ 0.5
2136
+ Norm Cnts
2137
+ 0
2138
+ 5
2139
+ 10
2140
+ 15
2141
+ 20
2142
+ 25
2143
+ Time (Minutes)
2144
+ 0.5
2145
+ 1.0
2146
+ 2.0
2147
+ 4.0
2148
+ 8.0
2149
+ 16.0
2150
+ Period (Minutes)
2151
+ 1
2152
+ 1
2153
+ 1
2154
+ 2
2155
+ 4
2156
+ 6
2157
+ 8
2158
+ 10
2159
+ 12
2160
+ Power
2161
+ 0.5
2162
+ 1.0
2163
+ 2.0
2164
+ 4.0
2165
+ 8.0
2166
+ 16.0
2167
+ Global Period (Minutes)
2168
+ Global Period at max. power ( 2.78 min.)
2169
+ B2
2170
+ 0
2171
+ 5
2172
+ 10
2173
+ 15
2174
+ 20
2175
+ 25
2176
+ Time (Minutes)
2177
+ ����UMGRAY
2178
+ ����UMGRAY
2179
+ ����UMGRAY
2180
+ 2
2181
+ 4
2182
+ 6
2183
+ 8
2184
+ Power
2185
+ Global Period at max. power ( 2.55 min.)
2186
+ B3
2187
+ 0
2188
+ 5
2189
+ 10
2190
+ 15
2191
+ 20
2192
+ 25
2193
+ Time (Minutes)
2194
+ ‚���UMGRAY
2195
+ ‚���UMGRAY
2196
+ ‚���UMGRAY
2197
+ 1
2198
+ 2
2199
+ 3
2200
+ 4
2201
+ 5
2202
+ 6
2203
+ Power
2204
+ Global Period at max. power ( 2.34 min.)
2205
+ B4
2206
+ 0
2207
+ 5
2208
+ 10
2209
+ 15
2210
+ 20
2211
+ 25
2212
+ Time (Minutes)
2213
+ ����EGRAY
2214
+ 0.0
2215
+ 3.7
2216
+ 7.4
2217
+ 11.1
2218
+ 14.9
2219
+ 1
2220
+ 2
2221
+ 3
2222
+ 4
2223
+ Power
2224
+ Figure B.3. Same as Figure 8 but for AIA 211 Å filter observations.
2225
+
MNAzT4oBgHgl3EQfkf3z/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/tmp_files/2301.02685v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Prepared for submission to JHEP
2
+ Gauss-Manin equations for propagators in the case
3
+ of arbitrary masses
4
+ S. Srednyak a
5
+ aDuke University,
6
+ Durham, USA
7
+ Abstract: We derive the complete list of singularities of propagators in theories with ar-
8
+ bitrary (complex) masses and for arbitrary diagram. We derive in a closed form differential
9
+ equations for the propagator as a function of the momentum and masses.
10
+ arXiv:2301.02685v1 [hep-th] 6 Jan 2023
11
+
12
+ Contents
13
+ 1
14
+ Introduction
15
+ 1
16
+ 2
17
+ Preliminaries
18
+ 1
19
+ 3
20
+ Results
21
+ 2
22
+ 4
23
+ Proofs
24
+ 2
25
+ 4.1
26
+ Proof of Th1
27
+ 2
28
+ 4.2
29
+ Proof of Th2
30
+ 3
31
+ 5
32
+ Discussion
33
+ 3
34
+ 6
35
+ Comparison with the known literature
36
+ 4
37
+ 7
38
+ Conclusion
39
+ 4
40
+ 1
41
+ Introduction
42
+ In this paper we derive the Gauss-Manin connection for propagators for arbitrary mass case.
43
+ Differential equations for perturbative amplitudes play an important role in their theory.
44
+ They can be used for numerical evaluation of the amplitudes as well as for analytic study.
45
+ There has been a large interest in this topic for the case of propagators. In particular, the
46
+ papers [1–3] address the case of sunrise graphs. More recently, there is more work on the
47
+ banana family [4, 5]. Beginning steps of all these analyses is the derivation of differential
48
+ equations for the function represented by the diagram.
49
+ We observe that singularities of propagators can be completely analysed in closed form.
50
+ In particular, we derive explicit equations for all of the singularities of the diagram func-
51
+ tion , relating them to the combinatorics of the diagram. Our derivation is based on the
52
+ observation that in appropriate coordinates the Landau polynomials are linear functions of
53
+ the coordinates.
54
+ 2
55
+ Preliminaries
56
+ We consider the standard propagators in massive theories [6] that can be written in the
57
+ form
58
+ Jm =
59
+
60
+ 1
61
+ �((qi + δip)2 + m2
62
+ i )qmdLdq
63
+ (2.1)
64
+ where δi = 0, 1, in general depending on the choice of momentum flow.
65
+ – 1 –
66
+
67
+ 3
68
+ Results
69
+ In this section we formulate our main results.
70
+ Th1 (Characterization of singularity locus of the propagator). The singularity locus of
71
+ the propagator is given by the set
72
+ x = ri1mi1 + ri2mi2 + .... + rismis
73
+ (3.1)
74
+ where ris are rational numbers that depend on the diagram.
75
+ There is finite set of such
76
+ numbers, the cardinality of which grows exponentially with the number of loops.
77
+ Prop. The singularities of the propagator in masses are located at the set
78
+
79
+ r′D
80
+ i mi = 0
81
+ (3.2)
82
+ for some integer numbers r′D
83
+ i
84
+ that depend on the diagram .
85
+ Th2 ( Differential equations for the propagator). The propagator satisfies the following
86
+ system of equations
87
+ ∂fD
88
+ ∂zk
89
+ = (
90
+
91
+ R={ri1...ris}
92
+ AD
93
+ k,R
94
+ x + ri1mi1 + ri2mi2...rismis
95
+ )fD
96
+ (3.3)
97
+ where the sum is extended over the set described in Th1. The matrices AD
98
+ k,I depend only
99
+ on coupling, dimension and diagram topology, and have no dependence on masses or the
100
+ momentum.
101
+ Analogous formula holds for the sum over all diagrams.
102
+ 4
103
+ Proofs
104
+ 4.1
105
+ Proof of Th1
106
+ We will carry out the proof only for leading singularities. The analysis of subleading sin-
107
+ gularities reduces to the case of sub diagrams. For leading singularity, there is a set of
108
+ propagators Dis(p, qi) that develop a vanishing cycle in their intersection
109
+ DI = ∩is∈IDis
110
+ (4.1)
111
+ We will consider the vanishing cycles at finite distance in q-space. The emergence of vanish-
112
+ ing cycles corresponds to degeneracy of the system of normals to the varieties {q : Di(p, q) =
113
+ 0}. Note that these varieties are highly degenerate. Each of them has as singularity locus a
114
+ (L−1)d-dimensional plane in q-space. Nonetheless, our criterion still works. It can be seen
115
+ by applying the general theory of vanishing cycles as applied to singular schemes [7, 8].
116
+ The criterion formulated above results in equations
117
+
118
+ bi(δs,ip + qs,i,1 + ... + qs,i,ri) = 0, s ∈ {0, ..., L}
119
+ (4.2)
120
+ for some bi that are not all zero. These equations can be solved for qi as
121
+ qi = aip
122
+ (4.3)
123
+ – 2 –
124
+
125
+ The singularities develop only when all vectors are collinear. Then the equations Ds(p, q) =
126
+ 0 can be rewritten in the form
127
+ Ds = (δsp + qs,1 + ...qs,rs)2 − m2
128
+ s = (δs + as,1 + ... + as,rs)2p2 − m2
129
+ s = 0
130
+ (4.4)
131
+ or
132
+ deltas + as,1 + ... + as,rs = ±ms/x
133
+ (4.5)
134
+ After elimination of the variables as,i we obtain our claim.
135
+ The case of the vanishing cycle at infinity is simpler. In this case, we simply drop
136
+ the terms m2
137
+ i and consider qi as homogeneous coordinates on the projective space CPLd−1.
138
+ Considerations similar to the above lead to the equation
139
+ p2 = 0
140
+ (4.6)
141
+ which is the only leading Landau singularity at infinity.
142
+ 4.2
143
+ Proof of Th2
144
+ To prove Th2 we use the general fact that integrals of the type we consider satisfy a system
145
+ of differential equations with respect to their parameters of the form
146
+ ∂f
147
+ ∂zk
148
+ = (
149
+ � Ak,I
150
+ LI
151
+ )f
152
+ (4.7)
153
+ where LI are the polynomials that give the singularity locus, and Ak,I are certain matrices (
154
+ choice of which is not unique) that are polynomial in the parameters. For general reference
155
+ see [griffiths, AGV]. The degree of the polynomials Ak,I must be strictly smaller than
156
+ the degree of LI because otherwise solutions of this system of equations would have a
157
+ singularity at infinity. In our case the polynomials are linear, therefore matices A must
158
+ have no dependence on x. Likewise, they can have no dependence on masses because it
159
+ would contradict regularity at infinity in mass space.
160
+ 5
161
+ Discussion
162
+ Our result fits propagators of quantum field theories into the family of equations
163
+ ∂f(x, l)
164
+ ∂xk
165
+ = (
166
+ � Ak,I
167
+ lI
168
+ )f
169
+ (5.1)
170
+ where Ak,I are constant matrices and lI are functions linear in the variables xi.
171
+ This
172
+ family of functions provides a natural generalization of the Grassmannian hypergeometric
173
+ functions considered in [9, 10]. It is desirable to obtain combinatorial characterization of
174
+ their solutions. To solve this problem, it is necessary to consider their dependence on the
175
+ parameters lI,i. This dependence leads to the study of irregular singularities [11, 12]. Full
176
+ solution of this problem would involve quantum groups [13, 14]
177
+ – 3 –
178
+
179
+ 6
180
+ Comparison with the known literature
181
+ In papers [1, 3] deep properties of the sunrise family were studied.
182
+ Sunrise graphs fall
183
+ inside the class of the diagrams that we consider. While the equations derived in [1, 3] are
184
+ seemingly more complicated, they in fact were derived before in [15]. The examination of
185
+ formulas (7) and (12) of [15] shows that the equations of [15] can be transformed into the
186
+ form stated in our theorem . The polynomial D in this paper can be decomposed into a
187
+ product of linear forms, after which a partial fractioning procedure can be applied.
188
+ Our method can be applied to the family of banana graphs [4, 5].
189
+ 7
190
+ Conclusion
191
+ In this paper we obtained Gauss-Manin connection for propagators that depend on an
192
+ arbitrary set of masses. We hope our results can be useful for numerical computation of
193
+ propagators and self energies.
194
+ References
195
+ [1] Luise Adams, Christian Bogner, and Stefan Weinzierl. The two-loop sunrise graph with
196
+ arbitrary masses. J. Math. Phys., 54:052303, 2013.
197
+ [2] Ettore Remiddi and Lorenzo Tancredi. Schouten identities for Feynman graph amplitudes;
198
+ The Master Integrals for the two-loop massive sunrise graph. Nucl. Phys. B, 880:343–377,
199
+ 2014.
200
+ [3] Spencer Bloch, Matt Kerr, and Pierre Vanhove. Local mirror symmetry and the sunset
201
+ Feynman integral. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 21:1373–1453, 2017.
202
+ [4] Albrecht Klemm, Christoph Nega, and Reza Safari. The l-loop Banana Amplitude from
203
+ GKZ Systems and relative Calabi-Yau Periods. JHEP, 04:088, 2020.
204
+ [5] Sebastian Pögel, Xing Wang, and Stefan Weinzierl. Bananas of equal mass: any loop, any
205
+ order in the dimensional regularisation parameter. 12 2022.
206
+ [6] Christian Bogner and Stefan Weinzierl. Feynman graph polynomials. International Journal
207
+ of Modern Physics A, 25(13):2585–2618, 2010.
208
+ [7] Masaki Kashiwara and Pierre Schapira. Microlocal study of sheaves. Number 51. Société
209
+ mathématique de France, 1985.
210
+ [8] Victor Ginsburg. Characteristic varieties and vanishing cycles. Inventiones mathematicae,
211
+ 84(2):327–402, 1986.
212
+ [9] Kazuhiko Aomoto, Michitake Kita, Toshitake Kohno, and Kenji Iohara. Theory of
213
+ hypergeometric functions. Springer, 2011.
214
+ [10] IM Gelfand and RD MacPherson. Geometry in grassmannians and a generalization of the
215
+ dilogarithm. Advances in mathematics, 44(3):279–312, 1982.
216
+ [11] Michio Jimbo, Tetsuji Miwa, and Kimio Ueno. Monodromy preserving deformation of linear
217
+ ordinary differential equations with rational coefficients: I. general theory and τ-function.
218
+ Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 2(2):306–352, 1981.
219
+ [12] On the algebro-geometric integration¶.
220
+ – 4 –
221
+
222
+ [13] Alexander Varchenko. Multidimensional hypergeometric functions the representation theory
223
+ of Lie Algebras and quantum groups, volume 21. World Scientific, 1995.
224
+ [14] Xiaomeng Xu. Closure of stokes matrices i: caterpillar points and applications. arXiv
225
+ preprint arXiv:1912.07196, 2019.
226
+ [15] Michele Caffo, H. Czyz, S. Laporta, and E. Remiddi. The Master differential equations for
227
+ the two loop sunrise selfmass amplitudes. Nuovo Cim. A, 111:365–389, 1998.
228
+ – 5 –
229
+
NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ filepath=/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf,len=150
2
+ page_content='Prepared for submission to JHEP Gauss-Manin equations for propagators in the case of arbitrary masses S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
3
+ page_content=' Srednyak a aDuke University, Durham, USA Abstract: We derive the complete list of singularities of propagators in theories with ar- bitrary (complex) masses and for arbitrary diagram.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
4
+ page_content=' We derive in a closed form differential equations for the propagator as a function of the momentum and masses.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
5
+ page_content=' arXiv:2301.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
6
+ page_content='02685v1 [hep-th] 6 Jan 2023 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Preliminaries 1 3 Results 2 4 Proofs 2 4.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
7
+ page_content='1 Proof of Th1 2 4.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
8
+ page_content='2 Proof of Th2 3 5 Discussion 3 6 Comparison with the known literature 4 7 Conclusion 4 1 Introduction In this paper we derive the Gauss-Manin connection for propagators for arbitrary mass case.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
9
+ page_content=' Differential equations for perturbative amplitudes play an important role in their theory.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
10
+ page_content=' They can be used for numerical evaluation of the amplitudes as well as for analytic study.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
11
+ page_content=' There has been a large interest in this topic for the case of propagators.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
12
+ page_content=' In particular, the papers [1–3] address the case of sunrise graphs.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
13
+ page_content=' More recently, there is more work on the banana family [4, 5].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
14
+ page_content=' Beginning steps of all these analyses is the derivation of differential equations for the function represented by the diagram.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
15
+ page_content=' We observe that singularities of propagators can be completely analysed in closed form.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
16
+ page_content=' In particular, we derive explicit equations for all of the singularities of the diagram func- tion , relating them to the combinatorics of the diagram.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
17
+ page_content=' Our derivation is based on the observation that in appropriate coordinates the Landau polynomials are linear functions of the coordinates.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
18
+ page_content=' 2 Preliminaries We consider the standard propagators in massive theories [6] that can be written in the form Jm = � 1 �((qi + δip)2 + m2 i )qmdLdq (2.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
19
+ page_content='1) where δi = 0, 1, in general depending on the choice of momentum flow.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
20
+ page_content=' – 1 – 3 Results In this section we formulate our main results.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
21
+ page_content=' Th1 (Characterization of singularity locus of the propagator).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
22
+ page_content=' The singularity locus of the propagator is given by the set x = ri1mi1 + ri2mi2 + .' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
23
+ page_content='..' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
24
+ page_content='. + rismis (3.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
25
+ page_content='1) where ris are rational numbers that depend on the diagram.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
26
+ page_content=' There is finite set of such numbers, the cardinality of which grows exponentially with the number of loops.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
27
+ page_content=' Prop.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
28
+ page_content=' The singularities of the propagator in masses are located at the set � r′D i mi = 0 (3.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
29
+ page_content='2) for some integer numbers r′D i that depend on the diagram .' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
30
+ page_content=' Th2 ( Differential equations for the propagator).' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
31
+ page_content=' The propagator satisfies the following system of equations ∂fD ∂zk = ( � R={ri1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
32
+ page_content='..' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
33
+ page_content='ris} AD k,R x + ri1mi1 + ri2mi2.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
34
+ page_content='..' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
35
+ page_content='rismis )fD (3.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
36
+ page_content='3) where the sum is extended over the set described in Th1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
37
+ page_content=' The matrices AD k,I depend only on coupling, dimension and diagram topology, and have no dependence on masses or the momentum.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
38
+ page_content=' Analogous formula holds for the sum over all diagrams.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
39
+ page_content=' 4 Proofs 4.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
40
+ page_content='1 Proof of Th1 We will carry out the proof only for leading singularities.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
41
+ page_content=' The analysis of subleading sin- gularities reduces to the case of sub diagrams.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
42
+ page_content=' For leading singularity, there is a set of propagators Dis(p, qi) that develop a vanishing cycle in their intersection DI = ∩is∈IDis (4.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
43
+ page_content='1) We will consider the vanishing cycles at finite distance in q-space.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
44
+ page_content=' The emergence of vanish- ing cycles corresponds to degeneracy of the system of normals to the varieties {q : Di(p, q) = 0}.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
45
+ page_content=' Note that these varieties are highly degenerate.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
46
+ page_content=' Each of them has as singularity locus a (L−1)d-dimensional plane in q-space.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
47
+ page_content=' Nonetheless, our criterion still works.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
48
+ page_content=' It can be seen by applying the general theory of vanishing cycles as applied to singular schemes [7, 8].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
49
+ page_content=' The criterion formulated above results in equations � bi(δs,ip + qs,i,1 + .' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
50
+ page_content='..' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
51
+ page_content=' + qs,i,ri) = 0, s ∈ {0, .' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
52
+ page_content='..' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
53
+ page_content=', L} (4.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
54
+ page_content='2) for some bi that are not all zero.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
55
+ page_content=' These equations can be solved for qi as qi = aip (4.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
56
+ page_content='3) – 2 – The singularities develop only when all vectors are collinear.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
57
+ page_content=' Then the equations Ds(p, q) = 0 can be rewritten in the form Ds = (δsp + qs,1 + .' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
58
+ page_content='..' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
59
+ page_content='qs,rs)2 − m2 s = (δs + as,1 + .' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
60
+ page_content='..' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
61
+ page_content=' + as,rs)2p2 − m2 s = 0 (4.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
62
+ page_content='4) or deltas + as,1 + .' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
63
+ page_content='..' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
64
+ page_content=' + as,rs = ±ms/x (4.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
65
+ page_content='5) After elimination of the variables as,i we obtain our claim.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
66
+ page_content=' The case of the vanishing cycle at infinity is simpler.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
67
+ page_content=' In this case, we simply drop the terms m2 i and consider qi as homogeneous coordinates on the projective space CPLd−1.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
68
+ page_content=' Considerations similar to the above lead to the equation p2 = 0 (4.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
69
+ page_content='6) which is the only leading Landau singularity at infinity.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
70
+ page_content=' 4.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
71
+ page_content='2 Proof of Th2 To prove Th2 we use the general fact that integrals of the type we consider satisfy a system of differential equations with respect to their parameters of the form ∂f ∂zk = ( � Ak,I LI )f (4.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
72
+ page_content='7) where LI are the polynomials that give the singularity locus, and Ak,I are certain matrices ( choice of which is not unique) that are polynomial in the parameters.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
73
+ page_content=' For general reference see [griffiths, AGV].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
74
+ page_content=' The degree of the polynomials Ak,I must be strictly smaller than the degree of LI because otherwise solutions of this system of equations would have a singularity at infinity.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
75
+ page_content=' In our case the polynomials are linear, therefore matices A must have no dependence on x.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
76
+ page_content=' Likewise, they can have no dependence on masses because it would contradict regularity at infinity in mass space.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
77
+ page_content=' 5 Discussion Our result fits propagators of quantum field theories into the family of equations ∂f(x, l) ∂xk = ( � Ak,I lI )f (5.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
78
+ page_content='1) where Ak,I are constant matrices and lI are functions linear in the variables xi.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
79
+ page_content=' This family of functions provides a natural generalization of the Grassmannian hypergeometric functions considered in [9, 10].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
80
+ page_content=' It is desirable to obtain combinatorial characterization of their solutions.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
81
+ page_content=' To solve this problem, it is necessary to consider their dependence on the parameters lI,i.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
82
+ page_content=' This dependence leads to the study of irregular singularities [11, 12].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
83
+ page_content=' Full solution of this problem would involve quantum groups [13, 14] – 3 – 6 Comparison with the known literature In papers [1, 3] deep properties of the sunrise family were studied.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
84
+ page_content=' Sunrise graphs fall inside the class of the diagrams that we consider.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
85
+ page_content=' While the equations derived in [1, 3] are seemingly more complicated, they in fact were derived before in [15].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
86
+ page_content=' The examination of formulas (7) and (12) of [15] shows that the equations of [15] can be transformed into the form stated in our theorem .' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
87
+ page_content=' The polynomial D in this paper can be decomposed into a product of linear forms, after which a partial fractioning procedure can be applied.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
88
+ page_content=' Our method can be applied to the family of banana graphs [4, 5].' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
89
+ page_content=' 7 Conclusion In this paper we obtained Gauss-Manin connection for propagators that depend on an arbitrary set of masses.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
90
+ page_content=' We hope our results can be useful for numerical computation of propagators and self energies.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
91
+ page_content=' References [1] Luise Adams, Christian Bogner, and Stefan Weinzierl.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
92
+ page_content=' The two-loop sunrise graph with arbitrary masses.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
93
+ page_content=' J.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
94
+ page_content=' Math.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
95
+ page_content=' Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
96
+ page_content=', 54:052303, 2013.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
97
+ page_content=' [2] Ettore Remiddi and Lorenzo Tancredi.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
98
+ page_content=' Schouten identities for Feynman graph amplitudes;' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
99
+ page_content=' The Master Integrals for the two-loop massive sunrise graph.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
100
+ page_content=' Nucl.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
101
+ page_content=' Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
102
+ page_content=' B, 880:343–377, 2014.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
103
+ page_content=' [3] Spencer Bloch, Matt Kerr, and Pierre Vanhove.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
104
+ page_content=' Local mirror symmetry and the sunset Feynman integral.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
105
+ page_content=' Adv.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
106
+ page_content=' Theor.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
107
+ page_content=' Math.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
108
+ page_content=' Phys.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
109
+ page_content=', 21:1373–1453, 2017.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
110
+ page_content=' [4] Albrecht Klemm, Christoph Nega, and Reza Safari.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
111
+ page_content=' The l-loop Banana Amplitude from GKZ Systems and relative Calabi-Yau Periods.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
112
+ page_content=' JHEP, 04:088, 2020.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
113
+ page_content=' [5] Sebastian Pögel, Xing Wang, and Stefan Weinzierl.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
114
+ page_content=' Bananas of equal mass: any loop, any order in the dimensional regularisation parameter.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
115
+ page_content=' 12 2022.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
116
+ page_content=' [6] Christian Bogner and Stefan Weinzierl.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
117
+ page_content=' Feynman graph polynomials.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
118
+ page_content=' International Journal of Modern Physics A, 25(13):2585–2618, 2010.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
119
+ page_content=' [7] Masaki Kashiwara and Pierre Schapira.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
120
+ page_content=' Microlocal study of sheaves.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
121
+ page_content=' Number 51.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
122
+ page_content=' Société mathématique de France, 1985.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
123
+ page_content=' [8] Victor Ginsburg.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
124
+ page_content=' Characteristic varieties and vanishing cycles.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
125
+ page_content=' Inventiones mathematicae, 84(2):327–402, 1986.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
126
+ page_content=' [9] Kazuhiko Aomoto, Michitake Kita, Toshitake Kohno, and Kenji Iohara.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
127
+ page_content=' Theory of hypergeometric functions.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
128
+ page_content=' Springer, 2011.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
129
+ page_content=' [10] IM Gelfand and RD MacPherson.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
130
+ page_content=' Geometry in grassmannians and a generalization of the dilogarithm.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
131
+ page_content=' Advances in mathematics, 44(3):279–312, 1982.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
132
+ page_content=' [11] Michio Jimbo, Tetsuji Miwa, and Kimio Ueno.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
133
+ page_content=' Monodromy preserving deformation of linear ordinary differential equations with rational coefficients: I.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
134
+ page_content=' general theory and τ-function.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
135
+ page_content=' Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 2(2):306–352, 1981.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
136
+ page_content=' [12] On the algebro-geometric integration¶.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
137
+ page_content=' – 4 – [13] Alexander Varchenko.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
138
+ page_content=' Multidimensional hypergeometric functions the representation theory of Lie Algebras and quantum groups, volume 21.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
139
+ page_content=' World Scientific, 1995.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
140
+ page_content=' [14] Xiaomeng Xu.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
141
+ page_content=' Closure of stokes matrices i: caterpillar points and applications.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
142
+ page_content=' arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
143
+ page_content='07196, 2019.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
144
+ page_content=' [15] Michele Caffo, H.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
145
+ page_content=' Czyz, S.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
146
+ page_content=' Laporta, and E.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
147
+ page_content=' Remiddi.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
148
+ page_content=' The Master differential equations for the two loop sunrise selfmass amplitudes.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
149
+ page_content=' Nuovo Cim.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
150
+ page_content=' A, 111:365–389, 1998.' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
151
+ page_content=' – 5 –' metadata={'source': '/home/zjlab/wf/langchain-ChatGLM/knowledge_base/NdE0T4oBgHgl3EQf0gIE/content/2301.02685v1.pdf'}
P9E2T4oBgHgl3EQfVwcE/content/tmp_files/2301.03825v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,2728 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ DRAFT VERSION JANUARY 11, 2023
2
+ Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63
3
+ An Analytical Theory for the Growth from Planetesimals to Planets by Polydisperse Pebble Accretion
4
+ WLADIMIR LYRA,1 ANDERS JOHANSEN,2, 3 MANUEL H. CAÑAS,1 AND CHAO-CHIN YANG4
5
+ 1New Mexico State University, Department of Astronomy, PO Box 30001 MSC 4500, Las Cruces, NM 88001, USA
6
+ 2Center for Star and Planet Formation, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
7
+ 3Lund Observatory, Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Lund University, Box 43, 221 00 Lund, Sweden
8
+ 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, Box 870324, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0324, USA
9
+ Submitted to ApJ
10
+ ABSTRACT
11
+ Pebble accretion is recognized as a significant accelerator of planet formation. Yet, only formulae for single-
12
+ sized (monodisperse) distribution have been derived in the literature. These can lead to significant underesti-
13
+ mates for Bondi accretion, for which the best accreted pebble size may not be the one that dominates the mass
14
+ distribution. We derive in this paper the polydisperse theory of pebble accretion. We consider a power-law
15
+ distribution in pebble radius, and we find the resulting surface and volume number density distribution func-
16
+ tions. We derive also the exact monodisperse analytical pebble accretion rate for which 3D and 2D accretion are
17
+ limits. In addition, we find analytical solutions to the polydisperse 2D Hill and 3D Bondi limits. We integrate
18
+ the polydisperse pebble accretion numerically for the MRN distribution, finding a slight decrease (by an exact
19
+ factor 3/7) in the Hill regime compared to the monodisperse case. In contrast, in the Bondi regime, we find
20
+ 1-2 orders of magnitude higher accretion rates compared to monodisperse, also extending the onset of pebble
21
+ accretion to 1-2 order of magnitude lower in mass. We find Myr-timescales, within the disk lifetime, for Bondi
22
+ accretion on top of planetary seeds of masses 10−6 − 10−4M⊕, over a significant range of the parameter space.
23
+ This mass range overlaps with the high mass end of the planetesimal initial mass function, and thus pebble
24
+ accretion is possible directly following formation by streaming instability. This alleviates the need for mutual
25
+ planetesimal collisions as a major contribution to planetary growth.
26
+ Keywords: Pebble accretion, planet formation.
27
+ 1. INTRODUCTION
28
+ Despite significant theoretical and observational advances
29
+ in the past decade, a comprehensive theory of planet for-
30
+ mation still remains elusive. Planet formation starts from
31
+ the accumulation of sub-µm interstellar grains, growing by
32
+ means of coagulation, in hit-and-stick low-velocity colli-
33
+ sions (Safronov 1972; Nakagawa et al. 1981; Tominaga et al.
34
+ 2021). Laboratory experiments (Blum & Wurm 2008; Güt-
35
+ tler et al. 2010) and numerical simulations (Güttler et al.
36
+ 2009; Geretshauser et al. 2010; Zsom et al. 2010) pro-
37
+ vide evidence that this process is efficient in growing solid
38
+ grains up to mm and cm radius (hereafter called “pebbles”)
39
+ with growth beyond this size being unlikely, due to bounc-
40
+ ing, fragmentation, and drift (Dullemond & Dominik 2005;
41
+ Corresponding author: Wladimir Lyra
42
43
+ Brauer et al. 2008; Krijt et al. 2015), unless the possibility of
44
+ very high porosities is introduced (Suyama et al. 2008, 2012).
45
+ The streaming instability (Youdin & Goodman 2005;
46
+ Youdin & Johansen 2007; Johansen & Youdin 2007; Kowa-
47
+ lik et al. 2013; Lyra & Kuchner 2013; Krapp et al. 2019;
48
+ Squire & Hopkins 2020; Schäfer et al. 2020; Paardekooper
49
+ et al. 2020; Chen & Lin 2020; McNally et al. 2021; Lin
50
+ 2021; Flock & Mignone 2021; Zhu & Yang 2021; Yang &
51
+ Zhu 2021) whereby the drift of grains through the gas is
52
+ unstable, has been established as a mechanism to produce
53
+ the first planetesimals (Johansen et al. 2007; Yang & Jo-
54
+ hansen 2014; Carrera et al. 2015; Simon et al. 2016; Yang
55
+ et al. 2017; Schaffer et al. 2018; Nesvorný et al. 2019; Li
56
+ et al. 2019; Klahr & Schreiber 2021; Visser et al. 2021; Li &
57
+ Youdin 2021), through concentration of pebbles into dense
58
+ filaments that display a fractal structure with large overden-
59
+ sities reached at the smallest scales of the simulations (Jo-
60
+ hansen et al. 2015). Yet, growth by binary accretion of plan-
61
+ arXiv:2301.03825v1 [astro-ph.EP] 10 Jan 2023
62
+
63
+ 2
64
+ LYRA ET AL.
65
+ etesimals into progressively larger objects, while able to ex-
66
+ plain the growth of a giant planet’s core at 5 AU (if migration
67
+ is ignored, Pollack et al. 1994), is not viable already at the or-
68
+ bital position of Saturn, Uranus, or Neptune (Thommes et al.
69
+ 2003; Johansen & Bitsch 2019).
70
+ This shortcoming of planetesimal accretion motivated the
71
+ search for other avenues of planetary growth. Fast accre-
72
+ tion rates of marginally coupled solids up to planetary masses
73
+ were first seen in the simulations of Lyra et al. (2008). In that
74
+ model, vortices trap pebbles and collapse them into Moon-
75
+ mass objects via direct gravitational instability, which scoop
76
+ up the remaining pebbles at a vertiginous rate, achieving
77
+ Mars and Earth mass within a few hundred orbits. Whereas
78
+ this growth was assisted by vortices, it illustrates that gas-
79
+ assisted accretion of pebbles is potentially much faster than
80
+ planetesimal accretion, due to the presence of gas drag as a
81
+ dissipative mechanism. A similar result was found by Jo-
82
+ hansen & Lacerda (2010), showing fast accretion rates onto
83
+ a 100 km seed, highlighting the importance of pebble accre-
84
+ tion for planetary growth, and suggesting for the first time
85
+ that a significant fraction of the accretion of planetary bodies
86
+ proceeds via pebbles (as opposed to planetesimals), before
87
+ the dissipation of the gas disk.
88
+ An analytical theory of pebble accretion was later devel-
89
+ oped by Ormel & Klahr (2010) and Lambrechts & Johansen
90
+ (2012), elucidating the existence of two regimes: one for
91
+ small masses, where the seed mass accretes from a pebble
92
+ headwind, a process reminiscent of Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton
93
+ accretion (Bondi & Hoyle 1944; Hoyle & Lyttleton 1939);
94
+ and another, for higher masses, where pebbles are accreted
95
+ from the whole Hill sphere of the seed. These regimes were
96
+ dubbed “drift-dominated” and “shear-dominated” by Ormel
97
+ & Klahr (2010), respectively, whereas Lambrechts & Jo-
98
+ hansen (2012) called them “Bondi” and “Hill”. As a rule of
99
+ thumb, planetesimals accrete in the Bondi regime, protoplan-
100
+ ets in the Hill regime (Ormel 2017; Johansen & Lambrechts
101
+ 2017), and both can yield orders-of-magnitude higher mass
102
+ accretion rates than planetesimal accretion.
103
+ Since its inception, the model has quickly risen to paradig-
104
+ matic status, by virtue of a number of successes.
105
+ Pebble
106
+ accretion explains the formation of the gas giants (Lam-
107
+ brechts & Johansen 2012), of the ice giants with low gas frac-
108
+ tions (Lambrechts et al. 2014); the preponderance of super-
109
+ Earths around other stars (Lambrechts et al. 2019; Bitsch
110
+ et al. 2019b; Izidoro et al. 2021); it achieves a better planet
111
+ population synthesis matching exoplanet populations than
112
+ a planetesimal-based accretion model (Bitsch et al. 2019a;
113
+ Drazkowska et al. 2022), and it is also compatible with the
114
+ drift-dominated evolution of dust in T-Tauri disks (a flux of
115
+ ∼ 100 Earth masses over the disk lifetime, Appelgren et al.
116
+ 2020). Even the classical giant impact model for terrestrial
117
+ planet formation (Raymond et al. 2004) is challenged now
118
+ by a hybrid view where terrestrial planets accrete their mass
119
+ from a combination of planetesimals and small pebbles (Jo-
120
+ hansen et al. 2015, 2021).
121
+ However, most previous works on pebble accretion con-
122
+ sidered a monodisperse distribution of pebbles. In reality,
123
+ the pebbles will have a distribution of sizes, ranging from
124
+ sub-µm to mm or cm-size. A monodisperse distribution can
125
+ be a reasonable assumption because, for the interstellar grain
126
+ size distribution, following a power-law of -3.5 of the grain
127
+ radius (Mathis et al. 1977; Hirashita & Kobayashi 2013,
128
+ MRN henceforth) most of the mass resides in the largest peb-
129
+ bles; a result that stands even after dust evolution away from
130
+ MRN in the protoplanetary disk is considered (Birnstiel et al.
131
+ 2012). This makes the Hill regime of pebble accretion rela-
132
+ tively insensitive to the dust spectrum, and either the dom-
133
+ inant pebble size (Lambrechts & Johansen 2014) or a mass
134
+ weighted representative pebble size (Guilera et al. 2020; Ven-
135
+ turini et al. 2020) yield sensible results.
136
+ Indeed, in a recent work, Andama et al. (2022), consider-
137
+ ing polydisperse Hill accretion, find larger final core masses,
138
+ not because of faster accretion rates, but because the smaller
139
+ grains drift more slowly, lingering around for longer times
140
+ than the largest pebbles, and thus extending the duration of
141
+ accretion. Dr ˛a˙zkowska et al. (2021) also considering the Hill
142
+ regime, focus on the beneficial aspects of fragmentation on
143
+ keeping the pebbles sizes small, because too large pebbles
144
+ accrete poorly.
145
+ Both works consider a body already near
146
+ the Bondi-Hill transition mass, a polydisperse size spectrum
147
+ from the prescription of Birnstiel et al. (2012), and solve nu-
148
+ merically for the mass accretion rates. Both works also high-
149
+ light how the mass accretion rate is dependent on the embryo
150
+ mass but not on pebble size.
151
+ In stark constrast, in the Bondi regime the size distribution
152
+ should matter significantly for the mass accretion rate itself.
153
+ In the Bondi regime, the best accreted pebbles are those of
154
+ friction time similar to the time the pebble takes to cross the
155
+ Bondi radius, i.e., the Bondi time. For small enough seed
156
+ mass, the larger, cm-sized, pebbles, drift so fast past the pro-
157
+ toplanet that these pebbles essentially behave like planetesi-
158
+ mals. In this case, the cross section for accretion is geometric
159
+ (for high speeds), or gravitationally focused (for low speeds),
160
+ and only slightly aided by gas drag. As a result, even though
161
+ these pebbles dominate the mass budget, their mass accre-
162
+ tion rate by the planetesimal can be lower than of the smaller
163
+ pebbles for which Bondi accretion is more efficient. If that is
164
+ the case, the pebble accretion rates in the Bondi regime may
165
+ be underestimated by the current monodisperse prescriptions.
166
+ Indeed, Lorek & Johansen (2022) recently find that planetes-
167
+ imal accretion is insignificant beyond 5 AU, so the onset of
168
+ pebble accretion has to overlap with the high-mass end of the
169
+ planetesimal mass function if planet formation is to proceed.
170
+
171
+ POLYDISPERSE PEBBLE ACCRETION
172
+ 3
173
+ In this paper, we work out the polydisperse extension of
174
+ pebble accretion. We find that indeed Bondi accretion is 1-2
175
+ orders of magnitude more efficient in the polydisperse case.
176
+ We also find that the onset of polydisperse Bondi accretion
177
+ occurs at lower masses than monodisperse, by 1-2 orders of
178
+ magnitude. Hill accretion is slightly less efficient, by a factor
179
+ 3/7, for the MRN distribution. We find the exact solution to
180
+ the 2D-3D transition, as well as analytical expressions for the
181
+ polydisperse 2D Hill and 3D Bondi accretion rates.
182
+ This paper is structured as follows. In Sect. 2 we derive the
183
+ grain size distribution functions; in Sect. 3 we apply them to
184
+ pebble accretion, deriving the polydisperse model, and pro-
185
+ ceeding with the analysis. In Sect. 4 we work out the an-
186
+ alytical expressions for 2D Hill and 3D Bondi polydisperse
187
+ accretion. A summary concludes the paper in Sect. 7. A ta-
188
+ ble of mathematical symbols used in this work is shown in
189
+ Table 1.
190
+ 2. DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS
191
+ Consider the grain size distribution
192
+ F(a,z) ≡ ∂n
193
+ ∂a
194
+ (1)
195
+ that defines the number density n; here, a is the grain radius
196
+ and z the vertical coordinate. We integrate it to yield
197
+ n(a,z) =
198
+ � a
199
+ 0
200
+ F(a′,z) da′,
201
+ (2)
202
+ and n(z) ≡ n(amax,z). The volume density is found by multi-
203
+ plying F(a,z) by the mass m(a) of a single grain
204
+ ρd(a,z) =
205
+ � a
206
+ 0
207
+ m(a′) F(a′,z) da′.
208
+ (3)
209
+ and again, ρd(z) ≡ ρd(amax,z).
210
+ Due to sedimentation, we
211
+ can write, for an equilibrium between diffusion and gravity
212
+ (Dubrulle et al. 1995)
213
+ F(a,z) ≡ f(a) e−z2/2H2
214
+ d ,
215
+ (4)
216
+ defining the function f(a), which is the size distribution func-
217
+ tion in the midplane. In Eq. (4), Hd is the grain scale height,
218
+ a function of a (Klahr & Henning 1997; Lyra & Lin 2013)
219
+ Hd = Hg
220
+
221
+ α
222
+ St+α,
223
+ (5)
224
+ where Hg is the gas scale height, α is a dimensionless ver-
225
+ tical diffusion parameter1, and St is the Stokes number, a
226
+ 1 This parameter is equivalent to the Shakura-Sunyaev parameter (Shakura
227
+ & Sunyaev 1973) for isotropic turbulence of equal diffusion of mass and
228
+ momentum (Youdin & Lithwick 2007; Yang et al. 2018).
229
+ non-dimensionalization of the grain radius, normalized by
230
+ the grain internal density ρ• and the gas column density Σg
231
+ St ≡ π
232
+ 2
233
+ a ρ•
234
+ Σg
235
+ .
236
+ (6)
237
+ 2.1. The distribution function in the midplane
238
+ To find f(a), consider spherical grains
239
+ m(a) = 4π
240
+ 3 a3ρ•
241
+ (7)
242
+ and the column density
243
+ Σd(a) ≡
244
+ � ∞
245
+ −∞
246
+ ρd(a,z) dz.
247
+ (8)
248
+ Substituting Eq. (3), and integrating in z, we find
249
+ Σd(a) = 25/2π3/2
250
+ 3
251
+ � a
252
+ 0
253
+ ρ• Hd a′ 3 f(a′) da′,
254
+ (9)
255
+ and the total column density Σd ≡ Σd(amax). We keep the
256
+ internal density ρ• inside the integral because it is in gen-
257
+ eral a function of radius, if grains have different composition.
258
+ Given
259
+ Σd(a) =
260
+ � a
261
+ 0
262
+ ∂Σd(a′)
263
+ ∂a′
264
+ da′,
265
+ (10)
266
+ we find, equating the integrands of Eq. (9) and Eq. (10), and
267
+ solving for f(a)
268
+ f(a) =
269
+ 3
270
+ 25/2π3/2Hgρ•
271
+
272
+ 1+ St
273
+ α a−3 ∂Σd(a)
274
+ ∂a
275
+ ,
276
+ (11)
277
+ where we also substituted Eq. (5) for Hd as a function of St.
278
+ The distribution is determined if we find an expression for
279
+ ∂aΣd(a).
280
+ 2.1.1. Sedimented and unsedimented limits
281
+ To find the general solution, we need to find the expression
282
+ for ∂aΣd in Eq. (11). We do so by realizing that even though
283
+ the midplane volume density is modified by sedimentation,
284
+ the column density Σd is not. The two limits of f(a) are,
285
+ first, the “sedimented” limit, for St ≫ α
286
+ f(a)(sed) =
287
+ 3
288
+ 8πHgρ1/2
289
+ • Σ1/2
290
+ g
291
+ α1/2 a−2.5 ∂Σd(a)
292
+ ∂a
293
+ ,
294
+ (12)
295
+ and, second, the unsedimented limit, for St ≪ α
296
+ f(a)(unsed) =
297
+ 3
298
+ 25/2π3/2Hgρ•
299
+ a−3 ∂Σd(a)
300
+ ∂a
301
+ ,
302
+ (13)
303
+ where we have substituted the Stokes number given by
304
+ Eq. (6). Since the column density does not change with sed-
305
+ imentation, we can find ∂aΣd by either limit.
306
+
307
+ 4
308
+ LYRA ET AL.
309
+ Table 1. Symbols used in this work.
310
+ Symbol
311
+ Definition
312
+ Description
313
+ Symbol
314
+ Definition
315
+ Description
316
+ F
317
+ Eq. (1)
318
+ pebble size distribution
319
+ ρd0
320
+ Eq. (39)
321
+ dust density at midplane
322
+ a
323
+ pebble radius
324
+ δv
325
+ Eq. (40)
326
+ approach velocity
327
+ z
328
+ vertical coordinate
329
+ S
330
+ Eq. (34)
331
+ stratification integral
332
+ n
333
+ Eq. (2)
334
+ number density
335
+ ∆v
336
+ Sub-Keplerian velocity reduction
337
+ m
338
+ Eq. (7)
339
+ pebble mass
340
+
341
+
342
+ GM⊙
343
+ r3
344
+ Keplerian frequency
345
+ ρd
346
+ Eq. (3)
347
+ volume density
348
+ ˆRacc
349
+ Eq. (53)
350
+ accretion radius
351
+ Hd
352
+ Eq. (5)
353
+ pebble scale height
354
+ χ
355
+ Eq. (41)
356
+ coefficient
357
+ f
358
+ Eq. (22)
359
+ pebble distribution in midplane
360
+ τ f
361
+ St/Ω
362
+ friction time
363
+ Hg
364
+ Ω/cs
365
+ gas scale height
366
+ tp
367
+ Eq. (42)
368
+ passing timescale
369
+ α
370
+ Shakura-Sunyaev viscosity
371
+ γ
372
+ Eq. (41)
373
+ coefficient
374
+ St
375
+ Eq. (6)
376
+ Stoker number
377
+ G
378
+ gravitational constant
379
+ ρ•
380
+ internal pebble density
381
+ Mp
382
+ planetesimal mass
383
+ Σg
384
+ Eq. (23)
385
+ gas column density
386
+ RH
387
+ Eq. (43)
388
+ Hill radius
389
+ Σd
390
+ ZΣg
391
+ pebble column density
392
+ tB
393
+ Eq. (47)
394
+ Bondi time
395
+ k
396
+ Eq. (14)
397
+ power law of unsedimented distribution
398
+ RB
399
+ Eq. (46)
400
+ Bondi radius
401
+ p
402
+ Eq. (16)
403
+ power law of column density distribution
404
+ Mt
405
+ Eq. (49)
406
+ transition mass
407
+ q
408
+ Eq. (17)
409
+ power law of internal density
410
+ MHB
411
+ Eq. (48)
412
+ Hill-Bondi transition mass
413
+ D
414
+ Eq. (20)
415
+ Coefficient of column density distribution
416
+ R
417
+ 3�
418
+ 3Mp
419
+ 4πρ•
420
+ planetesimal radius
421
+ Z
422
+ Σd/Σg
423
+ Dust-to-gas ratio
424
+ vesc
425
+
426
+ 2GMp
427
+ R
428
+ escape velocity
429
+ ρ(0)
430
+
431
+ internal density of largest grain
432
+ Stp
433
+ Eq. (51)
434
+ Stokes number past planetesimal
435
+ r
436
+ radial coordinate
437
+ MBL
438
+ Eq. (52)
439
+ Bondi-geometric transition mass
440
+ rc
441
+ Eq. (23)
442
+ cutoff radius
443
+ tacc
444
+ Eq. (54)
445
+ accretion time
446
+ W
447
+ Eq. (27)
448
+ column density distribution
449
+ h
450
+ Hg/r
451
+ aspect ratio
452
+ Racc
453
+ Eq. (41)
454
+ drag-modified accretion radius
455
+ mp
456
+ characteristic streaming instability mass
457
+ ξ
458
+ Eq. (41)
459
+ coefficient
460
+ ψ
461
+ Eq. (64)
462
+ shorthand
463
+ ˙M
464
+ mass accretion rate
465
+ T
466
+ Eq. (24)
467
+ gas temperature
468
+ cs
469
+
470
+ Tcp(Γ−1)
471
+ sound speed
472
+ Γ
473
+ adiabatic index
474
+ µ
475
+ mean molecular weight
476
+ cp
477
+ Rgas
478
+ µ
479
+ Γ
480
+ (Γ−1)
481
+ specific heat at constant pressure
482
+ Rgas
483
+ gas constant
484
+ cv
485
+ cp/Γ
486
+ specific heat at constant volume
487
+ We assume a power-law dependency for the unsedimented
488
+ distribution in the midplane
489
+ f(a)(unsed) ∝ a−k
490
+ (14)
491
+ where k is a constant (the MRN distribution corresponds to
492
+ k = 3.5). Equating Eq. (13) and Eq. (14)
493
+ ∂Σd(a)
494
+ ∂a
495
+ ∝ ρ• a3 a−k.
496
+ (15)
497
+ We thus write
498
+ ∂Σd(a)
499
+ ∂a
500
+ ∝ a−p;
501
+ (16)
502
+ ρ• ∝ a−q;
503
+ (17)
504
+ p−q = k −3.
505
+ (18)
506
+ We can then write the column density distribution as a power
507
+ law
508
+ ∂Σd(a)
509
+ ∂a
510
+ = D a−p.
511
+ (19)
512
+ Integrating it in a, equating to Eq. (10), and solving for the
513
+ constant D, we find
514
+ D = (1− p)ZΣg
515
+ a1−p
516
+ max
517
+ ;
518
+ (20)
519
+ here we also substitute Σd = ZΣg, where Z is the metallicity.
520
+ Considering now the variation of the internal density
521
+ ρ•(a) = ρ(0)
522
+
523
+ � a
524
+ amax
525
+ �−q
526
+ ,
527
+ (21)
528
+
529
+ POLYDISPERSE PEBBLE ACCRETION
530
+ 5
531
+ 10
532
+ 4
533
+ 10
534
+ 3
535
+ 10
536
+ 2
537
+ 10
538
+ 1
539
+ St
540
+ 10
541
+ 3
542
+ 10
543
+ 2
544
+ 10
545
+ 1
546
+ 100
547
+ 101
548
+ a (mm)
549
+ 10
550
+ 15
551
+ 10
552
+ 13
553
+ 10
554
+ 11
555
+ 10
556
+ 9
557
+ 10
558
+ 7
559
+ 10
560
+ 5
561
+ 10
562
+ 3
563
+ 10
564
+ 1
565
+ f(a)
566
+ Number density per radius
567
+ =10
568
+ 5 general
569
+ sedimented
570
+ =10
571
+ 4 general
572
+ sedimented
573
+ =10
574
+ 3 general
575
+ sedimented
576
+ unsedimented
577
+ 10
578
+ 4
579
+ 10
580
+ 3
581
+ 10
582
+ 2
583
+ 10
584
+ 1
585
+ St
586
+ 10
587
+ 3
588
+ 10
589
+ 2
590
+ 10
591
+ 1
592
+ 100
593
+ 101
594
+ a (mm)
595
+ 10
596
+ 13
597
+ 10
598
+ 12
599
+ m(a)f(a)
600
+ Mass density per radius
601
+ Figure 1. Left: The grain distribution function f(a) in the midplane. Integrated over a, this function yields the number density n in the
602
+ midplane. This model is calculated at 20 AU with density and temperature according to Eqs. (23) and (24), Z = 0.01, constant ρ•, and MRN
603
+ (unsedimented, St ≪ α, black dashed line). Three values of α are shown (solid lines). The “sedimented” limits (St ≫ α, dotted lines) are shown
604
+ for comparison. Right: mass density distribution, i.e., the left panel multiplied by the mass of a pebble. Integrated, this function yields the grain
605
+ density ρd0 in the midplane. The distributions follow the unsedimented line for St ≲ α, and the sedimented line for St ≳ α, as expected. The
606
+ mass function is constant with a in the sedimented limit because of the MRN choice: the a−3.5 power law is canceled by the combination of the
607
+ mass of the particle a3 and the extra √a dependency from the sedimentation. Large dots mark the point where St = α.
608
+ the full distribution is found at last
609
+ f(a) =
610
+ 3(1− p)ZΣg
611
+ 25/2π3/2Hgρ(0)
612
+ • a4−k
613
+ max
614
+
615
+ 1+aπ
616
+ 2
617
+ ρ•(a)
618
+ Σgα a−k.
619
+ (22)
620
+ Notice that to keep f(a) positive definite, the solution re-
621
+ quires p < 1. For q = 0, Eq. (18) constrains k < 4.
622
+ The gas density used is
623
+ Σg = 103 gcm−2 � r
624
+ AU
625
+ �−1
626
+ e−r/rc
627
+ (23)
628
+ i.e. the self-similar solution to the viscous evolution equa-
629
+ tions (Lynden-Bell & Pringle 1974). Here r is the distance to
630
+ the star, and rc a truncation radius. We choose rc =100 AU.
631
+ For the temperature, we use the irradiated, radially optically
632
+ thick, vertically optically thin model of Kusaka et al. (1970,
633
+ see also Ida et al. 2016)
634
+ T = 150K
635
+ � r
636
+ AU
637
+ �−3/7
638
+ (24)
639
+ In addition, we assume metallicity Z = 0.01, adiabatic in-
640
+ dex 1.4, and mean molecular weight 2.3.
641
+ We plot the resulting distributions in Fig. 1, for 20 AU,
642
+ maximum grain size amax = 1 cm, and k = −3.5. For internal
643
+ density we use ρ(0)
644
+ • = 3.5 g cm−3 and q = 0. The left panel
645
+ shows f(a); the right panel m(a) f(a).
646
+ The functions are
647
+ shown for three values of α (solid lines). The unsedimented
648
+ (St ≪ α, black dashed line) and “sedimented” (St ≫ α, dot-
649
+ ted lines) limits are shown for comparison. We see that the
650
+ sedimented distributions follow the unsedimented line for
651
+ St ≲ α, and the sedimented line for St ≳ α, as expected. The
652
+ flat profile for the sedimented cases is due to the MRN expo-
653
+ nent, coupled with
654
+
655
+ St from the sedimentation.
656
+ 2.2. Column density
657
+ For completeness, we define the vertically-integrated grain
658
+ size distribution
659
+ W(a) ≡
660
+ � ∞
661
+ −∞
662
+ F(a,z) dz =
663
+
664
+ 2π Hd f(a),
665
+ (25)
666
+ so that the pebble column density is
667
+ Σd(a) =
668
+ � a
669
+ 0
670
+ m(a′) W(a′) da′.
671
+ (26)
672
+ Substituting Eq. (22) in Eq. (25), we find the column den-
673
+ sity distribution function
674
+ W(a) = 3(1− p)ZΣg
675
+ 4πρ(0)
676
+ • a4−k
677
+ max
678
+ a−k,
679
+ (27)
680
+ which indeed yields Σd = ZΣg when integrated according to
681
+ Eq. (26).
682
+ 3. PEBBLE ACCRETION
683
+ Having found the size distribution function for the pebble
684
+ density, we are in position to apply it to pebble accretion.
685
+ Pebble accretion is usually split into three regimes of accre-
686
+ tion (loosely coupled, Bondi, and Hill accretion), each with
687
+ 2D and 3D limits. We start by deriving the exact solution for
688
+ the 2D-3D transition.
689
+
690
+ 6
691
+ LYRA ET AL.
692
+ 3.1. Exact solution for the monodisperse 2D-3D transition
693
+ The 3D and 2D limits of pebble accretion correspond to
694
+ whether or not the accretion is embedded, i.e, if the accretion
695
+ radius Racc exceeds the height of the pebble column. The
696
+ quantity governing the transition is Racc/Hd, or rather
697
+ ξ ≡
698
+ �Racc
699
+ 2Hd
700
+ �2
701
+ ,
702
+ (28)
703
+ which we will show a posteriori. The monodisperse mass
704
+ accretion rates in these limits are (Lambrechts & Johansen
705
+ 2012)
706
+ ˙M3D = lim
707
+ ξ→0
708
+ ˙M = πR2
709
+ accρd0δv,
710
+ (29)
711
+ ˙M2D = lim
712
+ ξ→∞
713
+ ˙M = 2RaccΣdδv,
714
+ (30)
715
+ where δv is the velocity at which the pebble approaches the
716
+ accretor, and ρd0 is the midplane density. In principle, we
717
+ could apply Eq. (3) with Eq. (22) on Eq. (29); and Eq. (26)
718
+ with Eq. (27) on Eq. (30), working with the two limits sepa-
719
+ rately. Yet, given that ξ is a function of grain size, and there
720
+ are other transitions to deal with (loose coupling/Bondi/Hill),
721
+ it is preferable to work with a general expression for ˙M,
722
+ which we derive in this section.
723
+ Considering parallel horizontal chords of infinitesimal
724
+ thickness in the vertical direction until the full accretion ra-
725
+ dius is taken into account, the general expression for the mass
726
+ accretion rate is
727
+ ˙M =
728
+ � Racc
729
+ −Racc
730
+ 2
731
+
732
+ R2acc −z2 ρd0 exp
733
+
734
+ − z2
735
+ 2H2
736
+ d
737
+
738
+ δv dz.
739
+ (31)
740
+ Following Johansen et al. (2015) we define the stratification
741
+ integral
742
+ S ≡
743
+ 1
744
+ πR2acc
745
+ � Racc
746
+ −Racc
747
+ 2
748
+
749
+ R2acc −z2 exp
750
+
751
+ − z2
752
+ 2H2
753
+ d
754
+
755
+ dz,
756
+ (32)
757
+ so that the mass accretion rate is generalized into one expres-
758
+ sion as
759
+ ˙M = πR2
760
+ accρd0 S δv.
761
+ (33)
762
+ While Johansen et al. (2015) use a square approximation
763
+ for the accretion radius, we find the exact solution of the
764
+ stratification integral
765
+ S = e−ξ [I0(ξ)+I1(ξ)],
766
+ (34)
767
+ where Iν(ξ) are the modified Bessel functions of the first
768
+ kind, and ξ is given by Eq. (28). The exact monodisperse
769
+ accretion rate is
770
+ ˙M = πR2
771
+ accρd0 δve−ξ [I0(ξ)+I1(ξ)].
772
+ (35)
773
+ 10
774
+ 1
775
+ 100
776
+ 101
777
+ Racc/2Hp
778
+ 0.5
779
+ 1.0
780
+ 1.5
781
+ 2.0
782
+ 2.5
783
+ M
784
+ Pebble Accretion Rate
785
+ Exact
786
+ 3D
787
+ 2D
788
+ Square Approx.
789
+ Square Approx. (0.79Racc)
790
+ Figure 2. General expression for the monodisperse pebble accretion
791
+ rate (Eq. 35). The 3D and 2D limits (eqs 29 and 30, respectively) are
792
+ recovered. The square approximation is also shown for comparison.
793
+ Indeed for ξ → 0, the Bessel functions tend to I0(0) = 1,
794
+ I1(0) = 0, and we recover 3D accretion (Eq. 29). For ξ → ∞,
795
+ both Bessel functions tend to eξ/√2πξ, and 2D accretion is
796
+ recovered (Eq. 30). Fig. 2 shows the agreement graphically.
797
+ The square approximation is shown for comparison.
798
+ 3.2. Polydisperse prescription
799
+ To generalize Eq. (35) into a polydisperse description, we
800
+ consider the integrated polydisperse accretion rate to be ˙M ≡
801
+ ˙M(amax), where
802
+ ˙M(a) =
803
+ � a
804
+ 0
805
+ ∂ ˙M(a′)
806
+ ∂a′
807
+ da′,
808
+ (36)
809
+ with
810
+ ∂ ˙M(a)
811
+ ∂a
812
+ = πR2
813
+ acc(a) δv(a) S(a) m(a) f(a).
814
+ (37)
815
+ Indeed, Eq. (36) with the integrand given by Eq. (37) is
816
+ equivalent to Eq. (35) if
817
+ � amax
818
+ 0
819
+ R2
820
+ acc(a) δv(a) S(a) m(a) f(a)da = ¯R2
821
+ acc δv ¯Sρd0,
822
+ (38)
823
+ where the overline denotes that the quantity is an “effective”
824
+ quantity, independent of pebble size. If the accretion radius
825
+ Racc, the approach velocity δv, and the stratification integral
826
+ S were independent of the grain radius a, Eq. (38) would be
827
+ exactly equivalent to replacing the midplane dust density by
828
+ the integrated grain size distribution
829
+ ρd0 =
830
+ � amax
831
+ 0
832
+ m(a) f(a)da,
833
+ (39)
834
+ which is intuitive. We can now use much of the formalism
835
+ of pebble accretion already derived in the literature. The ap-
836
+ proach velocity δv is given by
837
+ δv ≡ ∆v+ΩRacc,
838
+ (40)
839
+
840
+ POLYDISPERSE PEBBLE ACCRETION
841
+ 7
842
+ where ∆v is the sub-Keplerian velocity reduction and Ω is
843
+ the Keplerian frequency. The accretion radius is (Ormel &
844
+ Klahr 2010)
845
+ Racc ≡ ˆRaccexp
846
+
847
+ −χ(τ f /tp)γ�
848
+ ,
849
+ (41)
850
+ where τ f = St/Ω is the pebble friction time, χ = 0.4 and γ =
851
+ 0.65 are empirically-determined coefficients, and
852
+ tp ≡
853
+ GMp
854
+ (∆v+ΩRH)3
855
+ (42)
856
+ is the characteristic passing time scale. Here G is the gravita-
857
+ tional constant, Mp the mass of the planetesimal, and RH its
858
+ Hill radius
859
+ RH ≡
860
+ �GMp
861
+ 3Ω2
862
+ �1/3
863
+ .
864
+ (43)
865
+ The variable ˆRacc depends on the accretion regime. For Hill
866
+ accretion it is
867
+ ˆR(Hill)
868
+ acc
869
+ =
870
+ � St
871
+ 0.1
872
+ �1/3
873
+ RH,
874
+ (44)
875
+ and for Bondi accretion it is
876
+ ˆR(Bondi)
877
+ acc
878
+ =
879
+ �4τ f
880
+ tB
881
+ �1/2
882
+ RB,
883
+ (45)
884
+ where
885
+ RB ≡ GMp
886
+ ∆v2
887
+ (46)
888
+ is the Bondi radius and
889
+ tB ≡ RB
890
+ ∆v
891
+ (47)
892
+ is the Bondi time. The transition mass between Bondi and
893
+ Hill accretion is defined by (Ormel 2017)
894
+ MHB = Mt
895
+ 8St,
896
+ (48)
897
+ where
898
+ Mt ≡ ∆v3
899
+ GΩ .
900
+ (49)
901
+ A third regime also exists, of accretion of loosely coupled
902
+ pebbles, for which the accretion radius is the physical radius
903
+ R augmented by the gravitational focusing cross-section
904
+ R(geo)
905
+ acc
906
+ = R
907
+
908
+ 1+ v2esc
909
+ ∆v2 ,
910
+ (50)
911
+ where vesc is the escape velocity of the planetary seed. In this
912
+ regime the grains are so loosely coupled they behave almost
913
+ like planetesimals, except for small enough grains, that re-
914
+ main coupled to the gas and follow the gas streamlines. The
915
+ quantity that defines this latter transition is (Ormel 2017)
916
+ Stp = ∆v τ f
917
+ R
918
+ ,
919
+ (51)
920
+ that is, the friction time normalized by the time to pass past
921
+ the planetesimal; a planetesimal Stokes number (hence the
922
+ “p” in Stp). For Stp < 1, we set R(geo)
923
+ acc = 0. The transition mass
924
+ MBL between Bondi and loosely coupled accretion happens at
925
+ (Ormel 2017)
926
+ MBL = Mt
927
+ 8 St.
928
+ (52)
929
+ 3.3. Polydisperse vs Monodisperse
930
+ We show in the left panel of Fig. 3 a reproduction of the
931
+ monodisperse accretion rates from Johansen & Lambrechts
932
+ (2017), for a = 10 cm, and at 5 AU. Even though the obser-
933
+ vations do not support the existence of these large grains, we
934
+ use it for benchmark purposes. The different lines show the
935
+ pebble accretion rates in the Hill and Bondi regimes, as well
936
+ as the loosely coupled regime for low masses.
937
+ The Hill limit (blue dashed line) is recovered for Eq. (35)
938
+ with ˆRacc given by Eq. (44), and δv = ΩR(Hill)
939
+ acc . The Bondi
940
+ limit (red dashed line) is recovered for Eq. (35) with ˆRacc
941
+ given by Eq. (45), and δv = ∆v + ΩR(Bondi)
942
+ acc
943
+ . The actual solu-
944
+ tion (black thick line) uses
945
+ ˆRacc =
946
+
947
+ ˆR(Hill)
948
+ acc
949
+ if M ≥ MHB,
950
+ ˆR(Bondi)
951
+ acc
952
+ if M < MHB,
953
+ (53)
954
+ and the general δv given by Eq. (40). The mass accretion
955
+ rate is then the maximum between this and the loosely cou-
956
+ pled accretion rates. The loosely coupled regime is given by
957
+ Eq. (35) with δv = ∆v and Racc given by Eq. (50) if Stp ≥ 1,
958
+ and zero otherwise.
959
+ The right panel of Fig. 3 shows how the accretion rates dif-
960
+ fer when we include a particle size distribution. In this panel
961
+ we are showing the integrated accretion rate ˙M ≡ ˙M(amax)
962
+ given by Eq. (36). The monodisperse line is shown for com-
963
+ parison.
964
+ 3.3.1. Slightly lower efficiency in the Hill regime
965
+ From comparing the plots in Fig. 3, we see that the poly-
966
+ disperse accretion rate is slightly lower in the regime of Hill
967
+ accretion; this occurs because, in the Hill regime, there is less
968
+ mass at the biggest pebble size amax compared to monodis-
969
+ perse (where all pebbles are of 10 cm).
970
+ We work out in
971
+ Sect. 4 this reduction factor to be exactly 3/7.
972
+ 3.3.2. Significantly higher efficiency in the Bondi regime
973
+ In the Bondi regime, conversely, there are now pebbles
974
+ to accrete of friction time similar to the Bondi time.
975
+ In
976
+
977
+ 8
978
+ LYRA ET AL.
979
+ 10
980
+ 6
981
+ 10
982
+ 5
983
+ 10
984
+ 4
985
+ 10
986
+ 3
987
+ 10
988
+ 2
989
+ 10
990
+ 1
991
+ 100
992
+ 101
993
+ Mp/M
994
+ 10
995
+ 13
996
+ 10
997
+ 11
998
+ 10
999
+ 9
1000
+ 10
1001
+ 7
1002
+ 10
1003
+ 5
1004
+ 10
1005
+ 3
1006
+ 10
1007
+ 1
1008
+ M (M
1009
+ /yr)
1010
+ Accretion at 5AU - Monodisperse a =10 cm
1011
+ Actual
1012
+ Hill
1013
+ Bondi
1014
+ Loose Coupling
1015
+ Polydisperse
1016
+ 10
1017
+ 6
1018
+ 10
1019
+ 5
1020
+ 10
1021
+ 4
1022
+ 10
1023
+ 3
1024
+ 10
1025
+ 2
1026
+ 10
1027
+ 1
1028
+ 100
1029
+ 101
1030
+ Mp/MEarth
1031
+ 10
1032
+ 13
1033
+ 10
1034
+ 11
1035
+ 10
1036
+ 9
1037
+ 10
1038
+ 7
1039
+ 10
1040
+ 5
1041
+ 10
1042
+ 3
1043
+ 10
1044
+ 1
1045
+ M (M
1046
+ /yr)
1047
+ Accretion at 5AU - Polydisperse max(a )=10 cm
1048
+ Actual
1049
+ Hill
1050
+ Bondi
1051
+ Loose Coupling
1052
+ Monodisperse
1053
+ Figure 3. Comparison between monodisperse (left) and the integrated polydisperse (right) accretion rates (Eq. 36). The left panel uses the
1054
+ parameters of Fig. 4 of Johansen & Lambrechts (2017), except that we use the monodisperse general equation here derived (Eq. 35). A pebble
1055
+ size of 10 cm is not supported by observations but we keep this size for benchmarking purposes. The polydisperse accretion rate is reproduced
1056
+ in the left plot, and the monodisperse accretion rate in the right plot (grey lines), for comparison. The Hill accretion yields a lower accretion
1057
+ rate (3/7 lower than monodisperse) because other pebbles sizes are present, not only a = 10 cm. The main difference is the accretion rate for
1058
+ polydisperse Bondi accretion being up to two orders of magnitude more efficient than monodisperse, and the onset of pebble accretion happening
1059
+ over one order of magnitude lower in mass. This occurs because the best-accreted pebble is not present in the monodisperse distribution, and
1060
+ amax is too loosely coupled, accreting poorly. Notice the smooth transition from Bondi to Hill accretion with the exact 2D-3D transition.
1061
+ 10
1062
+ 5
1063
+ 10
1064
+ 4
1065
+ 10
1066
+ 3
1067
+ 10
1068
+ 2
1069
+ 10
1070
+ 1
1071
+ St
1072
+ 10
1073
+ 3
1074
+ 10
1075
+ 2
1076
+ 10
1077
+ 1
1078
+ 100
1079
+ 101
1080
+ 102
1081
+ a (mm)
1082
+ 10
1083
+ 6
1084
+ 10
1085
+ 4
1086
+ 10
1087
+ 2
1088
+ 100
1089
+ Mp/MEarth
1090
+ Hill
1091
+ Bondi
1092
+ Loose Coupling
1093
+ -17
1094
+ -16
1095
+ -15
1096
+ -14
1097
+ -13
1098
+ -12
1099
+ -11
1100
+ -10
1101
+ -9
1102
+ -8
1103
+ -7
1104
+ -6
1105
+ -5
1106
+ -4
1107
+ -18
1108
+ -16
1109
+ -14
1110
+ -12
1111
+ -10
1112
+ -8
1113
+ -6
1114
+ -4
1115
+ ln aM (M
1116
+ yr
1117
+ 1) at 5AU
1118
+ 10
1119
+ 5
1120
+ 10
1121
+ 4
1122
+ 10
1123
+ 3
1124
+ 10
1125
+ 2
1126
+ 10
1127
+ 1
1128
+ St
1129
+ 10
1130
+ 3
1131
+ 10
1132
+ 2
1133
+ 10
1134
+ 1
1135
+ 100
1136
+ 101
1137
+ 102
1138
+ a (mm)
1139
+ 10
1140
+ 6
1141
+ 10
1142
+ 4
1143
+ 10
1144
+ 2
1145
+ 100
1146
+ Mp/MEarth
1147
+ -7
1148
+ -6
1149
+ -5
1150
+ -4
1151
+ -3
1152
+ -2
1153
+ -1
1154
+ 0
1155
+ -0.5
1156
+ 0.5
1157
+ -8
1158
+ -6
1159
+ -4
1160
+ -2
1161
+ 0
1162
+ log [ ln aM(a) /
1163
+ ln aM(amax)] at 5AU
1164
+ Figure 4. Left: The polydisperse pebble accretion rate ∂ln a ˙M (Eq. 37), as a function of grain radius. In the Hill accretion regime the largest
1165
+ pebble present dominates the mass accretion rate. Conversely, for Bondi accretion, we see that at a given seed mass the differential accretion
1166
+ rate is non-monotonic with grain size. For low enough seed masses, the biggest grains, although dominating the mass distribution, accrete in
1167
+ the loosely coupled regime. Right: Same as the left plot, but normalized by the accretion rate for amax (proxy for monodispersive). The bright
1168
+ red contours are the regions were polydisperse accretion is enhanced over monodisperse. We see that it mostly corresponds to the region where
1169
+ monodisperse is in the loosely coupled regime, but polydisperse is already in Bondi. The best accreted pebbles are those for which the stopping
1170
+ time τ f equals the Bondi time tB. Absent in the monodispersive description, these pebbles may contribute less to the mass budget, but their
1171
+ enhanced accretion ends up dominating the mass accretion rate.
1172
+ the monodisperse regime there were only the 10 cm peb-
1173
+ bles that, for very low mass seed, behave like infinite St and
1174
+ do not accrete well. As a result, in the polydisperse case,
1175
+ Bondi accretion is more efficient than loosely coupled accre-
1176
+ tion over a wider range of low seed masses. At the mass
1177
+ where monodisperse experiences the onset of pebble accre-
1178
+ tion (about 10−4M⊕), the polydisperse distribution is well
1179
+ into the Bondi regime, which is about 100× more efficient.
1180
+ We also see that the onset of pebble accretion occurred be-
1181
+ tween 10−6 and 10−5M⊕, i.e., between 100-200 km. This is
1182
+ a significant early onset of pebble accretion, that may elim-
1183
+ inate the need for planetesimal accretion to bridge the gap
1184
+ between the largest masses formed by streaming instability
1185
+ and the onset of efficient pebble accretion (Johansen et al.
1186
+ 2015; Schäfer et al. 2017; Li et al. 2019).
1187
+ We plot in Fig. 4 the differential mass accretion rate as a
1188
+ function of pebble size (horizontal axis) and seed mass (ver-
1189
+ tical axis). The left panel shows the polydisperse mass accre-
1190
+ tion rate ∂ln a ˙M, and the right panel shows the ratio between
1191
+ that and the same quantity for the largest grain size in the dis-
1192
+
1193
+ POLYDISPERSE PEBBLE ACCRETION
1194
+ 9
1195
+ tribution, which we take as a proxy for monodisperse. The
1196
+ three accretion regimes are labeled in the left plot; one sees
1197
+ the smooth transition between Hill and Bondi accretion, and
1198
+ the discontinuous transition from Bondi to loosely coupled.
1199
+ It is seen that, at a given mass, Hill accretion is monotonic
1200
+ with particle size, but Bondi accretion is not. A local maxi-
1201
+ mum of mass accretion rate occurs, corresponding to the size
1202
+ for which τ f = tBondi, which in turn leads to a linear depen-
1203
+ dency on the best accreted particle size for a given seed mass.
1204
+ The bright red parts of the right plot show where Bondi ac-
1205
+ cretion is more efficient than monodisperse. It is the more
1206
+ efficient accretion of these grains that boosts the Bondi ac-
1207
+ cretion rates in the polydisperse case. We see that it corre-
1208
+ sponds chiefly to the region of the parameter space for which
1209
+ monodisperse accretion was in the loosely coupled regime,
1210
+ but the polydisperse is well within Bondi. This confirms that
1211
+ indeed it is the accretion of the smaller, Bondi-optimal, peb-
1212
+ bles, that is increasing the accretion rate.
1213
+ 3.4. Effect of distance
1214
+ We explore now the parameter space of stellocentric dis-
1215
+ tance; the results are shown in Fig. 5, showing the accretion
1216
+ rates at 10, 25, and 40 AU (notice also we decreased amax
1217
+ to 1 cm). The left plots show the integrated mass accretion
1218
+ rates ˙M, the middle plots the distribution ∂ln a ˙M, and the
1219
+ right plots the distribution normalized by the accretion rate
1220
+ for amax. The Hill accretion rate decreases only slightly with
1221
+ distance for this model, because the drop in Ω and Σd with
1222
+ distance is equally compensated by the increase in the Hill
1223
+ radius.
1224
+ As for the Bondi regime, we see that at the grain size where
1225
+ monodisperse would transition to loosely coupled, polydis-
1226
+ perse is still about two orders of magnitude more efficient,
1227
+ over all distances considered. The seed mass for onset of
1228
+ pebble accretion is also pushed down 1 order of magni-
1229
+ tude, from ∼ 5 × 10−5 to ∼ 5 × 10−6M⊕ at 10 AU. This is
1230
+ about 100-200 km radius (for internal densities 3.5 and 0.5
1231
+ g/cm3, respectively), reaching the range where pebble accre-
1232
+ tion onto the direct products of streaming instability is pos-
1233
+ sible. At 40 AU the onset of pebble accretion is pushed from
1234
+ ∼ 10−3M⊕ in monodisperse to ∼ 10−4M⊕ in polydisperse. A
1235
+ significant reduction, but still in the mass range of planetary
1236
+ embryos, so planetesimals formed at that distance should re-
1237
+ main planetesimals. This is in accordance to the solar system
1238
+ constrain given by the existence of the cold classical Kuiper
1239
+ Belt objects at 40-50 AU, presumably undisturbed planetesi-
1240
+ mals.
1241
+ As distance increases, both the accretion rate and the size
1242
+ of the best accreted pebble decreases. While at 10 AU the
1243
+ best accreted size for a 10−5M⊕ seed (150-300 km radius)
1244
+ is 1 mm, at 40 AU it decreases to 10 µm. This has implica-
1245
+ tions for the densities of formed objects if the smaller pebbles
1246
+ have different composition, e.g. the smaller ones being sili-
1247
+ cate in nature and the larger ones being icy. Then a planetes-
1248
+ imal seed will preferentially accrete pebbles of rocky com-
1249
+ position until it grows enough in mass to start accreting ices
1250
+ efficiently.
1251
+ The left panel of Fig. 6 shows the integrated polydisperse
1252
+ pebble accretion rate as a function of distance, from 1 to
1253
+ 100 AU. The mass accretion rate of a 10−4M⊕ seed at 20 AU
1254
+ is about 10−10M⊕yr−1. The thick black dashed line shows the
1255
+ typical mass of objects formed by streaming instability (Liu
1256
+ et al. 2020; Lorek & Johansen 2022). The thick grey dashed
1257
+ line shows 10 times that mass, proxy for the most massive
1258
+ objects formed directly by streaming instability.
1259
+ In the right panel we show the accretion time
1260
+ tacc ≡ Mp
1261
+ ˙M ,
1262
+ (54)
1263
+ along with the same curves for objects formed by stream-
1264
+ ing instability. The plot shows that a 0.1 Pluto mass (2 ×
1265
+ 10−4M⊕) seed has e-folding growth time of 1 Myr at 20 AU,
1266
+ and 10 Myr at 30 AU; that is, a Charon-mass planetary em-
1267
+ bryo can efficiently increase its mass by Bondi accretion dur-
1268
+ ing the lifetime of the disk. This implies that the formation of
1269
+ Pluto in the solar Nebula as far as 30 AU is possible by Bondi
1270
+ accretion of 10-100 µm grains onto a 0.1 Pluto mass seed.
1271
+ The plot also shows that up to 20 AU, the objects typ-
1272
+ ically formed by streaming instability (thick black dashed
1273
+ line) have growth times up to 3 Myr, within the lifetime of the
1274
+ nebula. Notice that, in the inner solar system, Bondi accre-
1275
+ tion on 10−6M⊕ seeds (≈ 100 km radius) at 3 Myr timescale
1276
+ is possible up to 3 AU. We conclude that Bondi accretion di-
1277
+ rectly on planetesimals is possible in the inner solar system,
1278
+ dismissing the need for mutual planetesimal collisions as a
1279
+ major contribution to planetary growth.
1280
+ 3.4.1. Effect of maximum grain size
1281
+ In Fig. 7 we show the model for 3 different maximum grain
1282
+ sizes, from left to right: 3 mm, 1 mm, and 0.3 mm. The main
1283
+ feature is that, as the maximum grain size decreases, the mass
1284
+ accretion rate (accretion time) for given seed mass at a given
1285
+ distance decreases (increases).
1286
+ The 3 Myr contour reaches 10−6M⊕ at 3 AU for amax =
1287
+ 3 mm, 10−6M⊕ at 2 AU for 1 mm, and 10−4M⊕ at 10 AU for
1288
+ 0.3mm. The conclusion is similar: Myr-timescale Bondi ac-
1289
+ cretion on top of 100 km seeds (10−6 M⊕) is possible in the
1290
+ inner solar system. Except for the model with amax = 0.3 mm,
1291
+ the typical products of streaming instability can grow by peb-
1292
+ ble accretion in 3 Myr timescales.
1293
+ We calculate also a 10× more massive model. The higher
1294
+ dust mass also comes with a higher gas mass, and thus a re-
1295
+ duction in Stokes number for the same pebble size. It is un-
1296
+ clear a priori which effect dominates. In Fig. 8 we show the
1297
+
1298
+ 10
1299
+ LYRA ET AL.
1300
+ 10
1301
+ 6
1302
+ 10
1303
+ 5
1304
+ 10
1305
+ 4
1306
+ 10
1307
+ 3
1308
+ 10
1309
+ 2
1310
+ 10
1311
+ 1
1312
+ 100
1313
+ 101
1314
+ Mp/MEarth
1315
+ 10
1316
+ 13
1317
+ 10
1318
+ 11
1319
+ 10
1320
+ 9
1321
+ 10
1322
+ 7
1323
+ 10
1324
+ 5
1325
+ 10
1326
+ 3
1327
+ 10
1328
+ 1
1329
+ M (M
1330
+ /yr)
1331
+ Accretion at 10AU - Polydisperse max(a )=1 cm
1332
+ Actual
1333
+ Hill
1334
+ Bondi
1335
+ Loose Coupling
1336
+ Monodisperse
1337
+ 10
1338
+ 5
1339
+ 10
1340
+ 4
1341
+ 10
1342
+ 3
1343
+ 10
1344
+ 2
1345
+ St
1346
+ 10
1347
+ 3
1348
+ 10
1349
+ 2
1350
+ 10
1351
+ 1
1352
+ 100
1353
+ 101
1354
+ a (mm)
1355
+ 10
1356
+ 6
1357
+ 10
1358
+ 4
1359
+ 10
1360
+ 2
1361
+ 100
1362
+ Mp/MEarth
1363
+ Hill
1364
+ Bondi
1365
+ Loose Coupling
1366
+ -16
1367
+ -15
1368
+ -14
1369
+ -13
1370
+ -12
1371
+ -11
1372
+ -10
1373
+ -9
1374
+ -8
1375
+ -7
1376
+ -6
1377
+ -5
1378
+ -4
1379
+ -16
1380
+ -14
1381
+ -12
1382
+ -10
1383
+ -8
1384
+ -6
1385
+ -4
1386
+ ln aM (M
1387
+ yr
1388
+ 1) at 10AU
1389
+ 10
1390
+ 5
1391
+ 10
1392
+ 4
1393
+ 10
1394
+ 3
1395
+ 10
1396
+ 2
1397
+ St
1398
+ 10
1399
+ 3
1400
+ 10
1401
+ 2
1402
+ 10
1403
+ 1
1404
+ 100
1405
+ 101
1406
+ a (mm)
1407
+ 10
1408
+ 6
1409
+ 10
1410
+ 4
1411
+ 10
1412
+ 2
1413
+ 100
1414
+ Mp/MEarth
1415
+ -6
1416
+ -5
1417
+ -4
1418
+ -3
1419
+ -2
1420
+ -1
1421
+ 0
1422
+ -0.5
1423
+ 0.5
1424
+ -6
1425
+ -4
1426
+ -2
1427
+ 0
1428
+ log [ ln aM(a) /
1429
+ ln aM(amax)] at 10AU
1430
+ 10
1431
+ 6
1432
+ 10
1433
+ 5
1434
+ 10
1435
+ 4
1436
+ 10
1437
+ 3
1438
+ 10
1439
+ 2
1440
+ 10
1441
+ 1
1442
+ 100
1443
+ 101
1444
+ Mp/MEarth
1445
+ 10
1446
+ 13
1447
+ 10
1448
+ 11
1449
+ 10
1450
+ 9
1451
+ 10
1452
+ 7
1453
+ 10
1454
+ 5
1455
+ 10
1456
+ 3
1457
+ 10
1458
+ 1
1459
+ M (M
1460
+ /yr)
1461
+ Accretion at 25AU - Polydisperse max(a )=1 cm
1462
+ Actual
1463
+ Hill
1464
+ Bondi
1465
+ Loose Coupling
1466
+ Monodisperse
1467
+ 10
1468
+ 4
1469
+ 10
1470
+ 3
1471
+ 10
1472
+ 2
1473
+ 10
1474
+ 1
1475
+ St
1476
+ 10
1477
+ 3
1478
+ 10
1479
+ 2
1480
+ 10
1481
+ 1
1482
+ 100
1483
+ 101
1484
+ a (mm)
1485
+ 10
1486
+ 6
1487
+ 10
1488
+ 4
1489
+ 10
1490
+ 2
1491
+ 100
1492
+ Mp/MEarth
1493
+ Hill
1494
+ Bondi
1495
+ Loose Coupling
1496
+ -17
1497
+ -16
1498
+ -15
1499
+ -14
1500
+ -13
1501
+ -12
1502
+ -11
1503
+ -10
1504
+ -9
1505
+ -8
1506
+ -7
1507
+ -6
1508
+ -5
1509
+ -4
1510
+ -16
1511
+ -14
1512
+ -12
1513
+ -10
1514
+ -8
1515
+ -6
1516
+ -4
1517
+ ln aM (M
1518
+ yr
1519
+ 1) at 25AU
1520
+ 10
1521
+ 4
1522
+ 10
1523
+ 3
1524
+ 10
1525
+ 2
1526
+ 10
1527
+ 1
1528
+ St
1529
+ 10
1530
+ 3
1531
+ 10
1532
+ 2
1533
+ 10
1534
+ 1
1535
+ 100
1536
+ 101
1537
+ a (mm)
1538
+ 10
1539
+ 6
1540
+ 10
1541
+ 4
1542
+ 10
1543
+ 2
1544
+ 100
1545
+ Mp/MEarth
1546
+ -6
1547
+ -5
1548
+ -4
1549
+ -3
1550
+ -2
1551
+ -1
1552
+ 0
1553
+ 1
1554
+ -0.5
1555
+ 0.5
1556
+ -6
1557
+ -4
1558
+ -2
1559
+ 0
1560
+ log [ ln aM(a) /
1561
+ ln aM(amax)] at 25AU
1562
+ 10
1563
+ 6
1564
+ 10
1565
+ 5
1566
+ 10
1567
+ 4
1568
+ 10
1569
+ 3
1570
+ 10
1571
+ 2
1572
+ 10
1573
+ 1
1574
+ 100
1575
+ 101
1576
+ Mp/MEarth
1577
+ 10
1578
+ 13
1579
+ 10
1580
+ 11
1581
+ 10
1582
+ 9
1583
+ 10
1584
+ 7
1585
+ 10
1586
+ 5
1587
+ 10
1588
+ 3
1589
+ 10
1590
+ 1
1591
+ M (M
1592
+ /yr)
1593
+ Accretion at 40AU - Polydisperse max(a )=1 cm
1594
+ Actual
1595
+ Hill
1596
+ Bondi
1597
+ Loose Coupling
1598
+ Monodisperse
1599
+ 10
1600
+ 4
1601
+ 10
1602
+ 3
1603
+ 10
1604
+ 2
1605
+ 10
1606
+ 1
1607
+ St
1608
+ 10
1609
+ 3
1610
+ 10
1611
+ 2
1612
+ 10
1613
+ 1
1614
+ 100
1615
+ 101
1616
+ a (mm)
1617
+ 10
1618
+ 6
1619
+ 10
1620
+ 4
1621
+ 10
1622
+ 2
1623
+ 100
1624
+ Mp/MEarth
1625
+ Hill
1626
+ Bondi
1627
+ Loose Coupling
1628
+ -17
1629
+ -16
1630
+ -15
1631
+ -14
1632
+ -13
1633
+ -12
1634
+ -11
1635
+ -10
1636
+ -9
1637
+ -8
1638
+ -7
1639
+ -6
1640
+ -5
1641
+ -4
1642
+ -18
1643
+ -16
1644
+ -14
1645
+ -12
1646
+ -10
1647
+ -8
1648
+ -6
1649
+ -4
1650
+ ln aM (M
1651
+ yr
1652
+ 1) at 40AU
1653
+ 10
1654
+ 4
1655
+ 10
1656
+ 3
1657
+ 10
1658
+ 2
1659
+ 10
1660
+ 1
1661
+ St
1662
+ 10
1663
+ 3
1664
+ 10
1665
+ 2
1666
+ 10
1667
+ 1
1668
+ 100
1669
+ 101
1670
+ a (mm)
1671
+ 10
1672
+ 6
1673
+ 10
1674
+ 4
1675
+ 10
1676
+ 2
1677
+ 100
1678
+ Mp/MEarth
1679
+ -6
1680
+ -5
1681
+ -4
1682
+ -3
1683
+ -2
1684
+ -1
1685
+ 0
1686
+ 1
1687
+ -0.5
1688
+ 0.5
1689
+ -6
1690
+ -4
1691
+ -2
1692
+ 0
1693
+ log [ ln aM(a) /
1694
+ ln aM(amax)] at 40AU
1695
+ Figure 5. Left: Same as Fig. 3, right plot, but for the density and temperature of Eqs. (23) and (24), Z=0.01, and at different distances. Hill
1696
+ accretion is not much affected by distance, but Bondi accretion becomes increasingly less efficient as distance increases. Yet, the general trend
1697
+ remains, of polydisperse pebble accretion being 1-2 orders of magnitude more efficient than monodisperse at maximum, and showing an earlier
1698
+ onset in mass also by 1-2 orders of magnitude. Middle and Right: same as Fig. 4, at difference distances. The pebble size that maximizes
1699
+ Bondi accretion decreases as distance increases. This has interesting implications, because in the outer disk, the seeds, presumably icy, should
1700
+ accrete small grains, presumably silicates. This implies the possibility a two-mode formation of Kuiper belt objects: icy planetesimal produced
1701
+ by streaming instability of larger grains, followed by pebble accretion of smaller, silicate, grains.
1702
+ formation times for the model, using amax = 1cm. The for-
1703
+ mation times are overall shorter compared to the right panel
1704
+ of Fig. 6, pushing the 3 Myr e-folding contour to double the
1705
+ distance vis-à-vis the lower mass model (7 AU for 100 km,
1706
+ 30 AU for 10−2 Pluto mass, and 60 AU for 10−1 Pluto mass).
1707
+ Even at this higher mass model, a 100 km seed has an e-
1708
+ folding growth time of over 100 Myr at 40 AU, and should
1709
+ remain planetesimals, as expected.
1710
+ 3.4.2. Effect of sedimentation
1711
+ In Fig. 9 we show the e-folding growth times for the plan-
1712
+ etary seeds formed by streaming instability (typical objects
1713
+ and most massive objects), as a function of the turbulent vis-
1714
+ cosity parameter α.
1715
+ Its function in the model is only on
1716
+ how it influences sedimentation.
1717
+ The grey dotted line in
1718
+ the plot marks the threshold of 3 Myr. For moderately high
1719
+ turbulence (α = 10−3), the typical seeds have longer growth
1720
+ times than 3 Myr already beyond 6 AU. For lower turbulence,
1721
+ α = 10−5, as most pebbles are sedimented, the distance where
1722
+ growth occurs within 3 Myr increases to 40 AU. The most
1723
+ massive objects, well into the Bondi regime, all have fast
1724
+ growth times.
1725
+ 4. ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS
1726
+ In this section we derive the analytical solutions in the rel-
1727
+ evant limits of 2D Hill accretion and 3D Bondi accretion. In
1728
+ a polydisperse distribution, the pebble scale height is a func-
1729
+ tion of pebble radius, so the pebbles are not necessarily all in
1730
+ the 2D regime or all in the 3D regime. Also, because the tran-
1731
+ sitions between loosely coupled and Bondi, and from Bondi
1732
+ to Hill are St-dependent, the pebbles are not all in the same
1733
+ regime of accretion either.
1734
+ Yet, in practice these limits still yield reasonably accurate
1735
+ accretion rates. Because the distribution is top heavy, the
1736
+ 2D Hill regime is applicable for large seed masses, that are
1737
+ accreting in this regime the biggest pebbles, which are re-
1738
+ sponsible for most of the mass accretion rate. The 3D Bondi
1739
+
1740
+ POLYDISPERSE PEBBLE ACCRETION
1741
+ 11
1742
+ 100
1743
+ 101
1744
+ 102
1745
+ r/au
1746
+ 10
1747
+ 6
1748
+ 10
1749
+ 5
1750
+ 10
1751
+ 4
1752
+ 10
1753
+ 3
1754
+ 10
1755
+ 2
1756
+ 10
1757
+ 1
1758
+ 100
1759
+ 101
1760
+ Mp/M
1761
+ Polydisperse Accretion Rate - amax=1.0cm
1762
+ -15
1763
+ -14
1764
+ -13
1765
+ -12
1766
+ -11
1767
+ -10
1768
+ -9
1769
+ -8
1770
+ -7
1771
+ -6
1772
+ -5
1773
+ -4
1774
+ 10 mp
1775
+ mp
1776
+ 17
1777
+ 15
1778
+ 13
1779
+ 11
1780
+ 9
1781
+ 7
1782
+ 5
1783
+ 3
1784
+ log10 [ M / (M
1785
+ yr
1786
+ 1) ]
1787
+ 100
1788
+ 101
1789
+ 102
1790
+ r/au
1791
+ 10
1792
+ 6
1793
+ 10
1794
+ 5
1795
+ 10
1796
+ 4
1797
+ 10
1798
+ 3
1799
+ 10
1800
+ 2
1801
+ 10
1802
+ 1
1803
+ 100
1804
+ 101
1805
+ Mp/M
1806
+ Accretion Timescale - amax=1.0cm
1807
+ 4.0
1808
+ 4.5
1809
+ 5.0
1810
+ 5.5
1811
+ 6.0
1812
+ 6.5
1813
+ 7.0
1814
+ 7.5
1815
+ 8.0
1816
+ 8.5
1817
+ 9.0
1818
+ 10 mp
1819
+ mp
1820
+ 3
1821
+ 4
1822
+ 5
1823
+ 6
1824
+ 7
1825
+ 8
1826
+ 9
1827
+ 10
1828
+ log10 ( tacc/yr )
1829
+ Figure 6. Left: Integrated polydisperse pebble mass accretion rate, as a function of distance. The model uses the density and temperature of
1830
+ Eqs. (23) and (24), Z=0.01, and ρ• constant. The thick black dashed line shows the characteristic size of the planetesimals formed by streaming
1831
+ instability (Liu et al. 2020; Lorek & Johansen 2022); the grey line represents bodies of 10× the typical mass. Right: Accretion times M/ ˙M for
1832
+ the same model. The contour of 6.5 (3Myr) marks the boundary where accretion during the lifetime of the nebula is feasible by pebble accretion,
1833
+ without the need for planetesimal accretion. That contour corresponds to 3 AU, 10 AU, and 30 AU, for 10−6M⊕, 2×10−5M⊕, and 2×10−4M⊕,
1834
+ respectively. These masses correspond to 100 km radius, 10−2 and 10−1 Pluto masses, respectively. The typical products of streaming instability
1835
+ have <3 Myr growth times up to 30 AU.
1836
+ 100
1837
+ 101
1838
+ 102
1839
+ r/au
1840
+ 10
1841
+ 6
1842
+ 10
1843
+ 5
1844
+ 10
1845
+ 4
1846
+ 10
1847
+ 3
1848
+ 10
1849
+ 2
1850
+ 10
1851
+ 1
1852
+ 100
1853
+ 101
1854
+ Mp/M
1855
+ Accretion Timescale - amax=3.0mm
1856
+ 4.5
1857
+ 5.0
1858
+ 5.5
1859
+ 5.5
1860
+ 6.0
1861
+ 6.5
1862
+ 7.0
1863
+ 7.5
1864
+ 8.0
1865
+ 8.5
1866
+ 9.0
1867
+ 9.5
1868
+ 10 mp
1869
+ mp
1870
+ 3
1871
+ 4
1872
+ 5
1873
+ 6
1874
+ 7
1875
+ 8
1876
+ 9
1877
+ 10
1878
+ log10 ( tacc/yr )
1879
+ 100
1880
+ 101
1881
+ 102
1882
+ r/au
1883
+ 10
1884
+ 6
1885
+ 10
1886
+ 5
1887
+ 10
1888
+ 4
1889
+ 10
1890
+ 3
1891
+ 10
1892
+ 2
1893
+ 10
1894
+ 1
1895
+ 100
1896
+ 101
1897
+ Mp/M
1898
+ Accretion Timescale - amax=1.0mm
1899
+ 5.0
1900
+ 5.5
1901
+ 6.0
1902
+ 6.5
1903
+ 7.0
1904
+ 7.5
1905
+ 8.0
1906
+ 8.5
1907
+ 9.0
1908
+ 9.5
1909
+ 10 mp
1910
+ mp
1911
+ 3
1912
+ 4
1913
+ 5
1914
+ 6
1915
+ 7
1916
+ 8
1917
+ 9
1918
+ 10
1919
+ log10 ( tacc/yr )
1920
+ 100
1921
+ 101
1922
+ 102
1923
+ r/au
1924
+ 10
1925
+ 6
1926
+ 10
1927
+ 5
1928
+ 10
1929
+ 4
1930
+ 10
1931
+ 3
1932
+ 10
1933
+ 2
1934
+ 10
1935
+ 1
1936
+ 100
1937
+ 101
1938
+ Mp/M
1939
+ Accretion Timescale - amax=0.3mm
1940
+ 6.0
1941
+ 6.5
1942
+ 7.0
1943
+ 7.5
1944
+ 8.0
1945
+ 8.5
1946
+ 9.0
1947
+ 9.5
1948
+ 10 mp
1949
+ mp
1950
+ 3
1951
+ 4
1952
+ 5
1953
+ 6
1954
+ 7
1955
+ 8
1956
+ 9
1957
+ 10
1958
+ log10 ( tacc/yr )
1959
+ Figure 7. Same as Fig. 6, but exploring the parameter space of maximum grain radius amax, from left to right: 3 mm, 1 mm, and 0.3 mm. Upper
1960
+ plots show mass accretion rate, lower plots the accretion times. The trend seen is that Bondi accretion rates decrease with amax for the same
1961
+ seed mass and distance. The contour of 6.5 (3Myr) marks the boundary where accretion during the lifetime of the nebula is feasible by pebble
1962
+ accretion, without the need for planetesimal accretion. This translates into ≈ 3 AU for 100 km seeds (10−6M⊕), 10 AU for 0.01 Pluto mass
1963
+ (2×10−5M⊕), and up to 30 AU for 0.1 Pluto mass (2×10−4M⊕), for the first two models. The typical products of streaming instability grow in
1964
+ Myr timescales except for the last model, of maximum grain size 0.3 mm.
1965
+ regime is applicable as long as Racc < 2Hd (Eq. 28), which
1966
+ solving for mass yields
1967
+ Mp < ∆vΩH2
1968
+
1969
+ GSt(St+α).
1970
+ (55)
1971
+ Normalizing by the transition mass Mt, we find
1972
+ Mp
1973
+ Mt
1974
+
1975
+ α
1976
+ h2St(St+α),
1977
+ (56)
1978
+ where h ≡ Hg/r is the disk aspect ratio. For α ∼ 10−4 and
1979
+ h ∼ 10−2, 3D Bondi accretion should apply close to the tran-
1980
+ sition mass, except for big enough pebbles, as expected, be-
1981
+ cause these are too sedimented. Yet, as we have established,
1982
+ these pebbles contribute poorly to the mass accretion rate.
1983
+ For particles of τ f = tB, and assuming St ≫ α, we find
1984
+ Mp
1985
+ Mt
1986
+
1987
+ � α
1988
+ h2
1989
+ �1/3
1990
+ ,
1991
+ (57)
1992
+ i.e., within the expected ranges of α and h, the seed mass
1993
+ for which τ f = tB is within a factor of order unity from the
1994
+ transition mass. We conclude that a 3D approximation for
1995
+ the Bondi regime should lead to acceptable results.
1996
+ We work now the analytical expressions in these limits.
1997
+ 4.1. Analytical Polydisperse 2D Hill accretion
1998
+
1999
+ 12
2000
+ LYRA ET AL.
2001
+ 100
2002
+ 101
2003
+ 102
2004
+ r/au
2005
+ 10
2006
+ 6
2007
+ 10
2008
+ 5
2009
+ 10
2010
+ 4
2011
+ 10
2012
+ 3
2013
+ 10
2014
+ 2
2015
+ 10
2016
+ 1
2017
+ 100
2018
+ 101
2019
+ Mp/M
2020
+ Accretion Timescale - amax=1.0cm - 10
2021
+ 4.0
2022
+ 4.5
2023
+ 5.0
2024
+ 5.5
2025
+ 6.0
2026
+ 6.5
2027
+ 7.0
2028
+ 7.5
2029
+ 8.0
2030
+ 8.5
2031
+ 10 mp
2032
+ mp
2033
+ 3
2034
+ 4
2035
+ 5
2036
+ 6
2037
+ 7
2038
+ 8
2039
+ 9
2040
+ 10
2041
+ log10 ( tacc/yr )
2042
+ Figure 8. Same as the right panel of Fig. 6, but for 10 times the disk
2043
+ mass. Although the Stokes number decreases for the same particle
2044
+ radius, the increase in dust mass is the dominant effect, and accre-
2045
+ tion times decrease for the same seed mass and distance. Compared
2046
+ to the lower-mass model, the line of 3 Myr e-folding growth time
2047
+ is pushed to about twice the distance, allowing for pebble accre-
2048
+ tion on top of 100 km seeds (10−6M⊕) up to 7 AU. 200 km objects
2049
+ (10−5M⊕) can accrete pebbles efficiently up to 30 AU. At 40 AU ac-
2050
+ cretion on 100 km seeds takes over 100 Myr and they should remain
2051
+ planetesimals, consistent with evidence from the Solar System.
2052
+ 100
2053
+ 101
2054
+ 102
2055
+ r/au
2056
+ 105
2057
+ 106
2058
+ 107
2059
+ 108
2060
+ tacc/yr
2061
+ Accretion times
2062
+ = 10
2063
+ 3, mp
2064
+ = 10
2065
+ 4, mp
2066
+ = 10
2067
+ 5, mp
2068
+ = 10
2069
+ 3, 10 mp
2070
+ = 10
2071
+ 4, 10 mp
2072
+ = 10
2073
+ 5, 10 mp
2074
+ Figure 9. Polydisperse pebble accretion timescales for different
2075
+ α values for the typical masses produced by streaming instability
2076
+ (solid lines), and ten times this mass (dashed lines), taken as proxy
2077
+ for the end of the streaming instability mass function. The grey dot-
2078
+ ted line marks 3 Myr. For α = 10−3, the typical seeds only grow
2079
+ within the lifetime of the nebula in the inner solar system, up to
2080
+ ≈5-10 AU. For lower turbulence, α = 10−5, as most pebbles are sed-
2081
+ imented, the distance increases to 40 AU.
2082
+ We can integrate the polydisperse Hill regime analytically
2083
+ in the 2D limit by generalizing Eq. (30) with Σd given by
2084
+ Eq. (26)
2085
+ ˙M2D,Hill = 2×102/3ΩR2
2086
+ H
2087
+ � amax
2088
+ 0
2089
+ St(a)2/3 m(a)W(a)da. (58)
2090
+ Given the scalings St ∝ a1−q, m ∝ a3−q, and W ∝ a−k, the
2091
+ dependency of the integrand of Eq. (58) on a is
2092
+ ∂ ˙M(a)
2093
+ ∂a
2094
+ 2D,Hill ∝ a(11−5q−3k)/3
2095
+ (59)
2096
+ Integrating it in a, we find the exact solution
2097
+ ˙M2D,Hill =
2098
+ 6(1− p)
2099
+ 14−5q−3k
2100
+ �Stmax
2101
+ 0.1
2102
+ �2/3
2103
+ Ω R2
2104
+ H Z Σg.
2105
+ (60)
2106
+ Eq. (60) differs from the monodisperse case (Eq. 30) by an
2107
+ efficiency factor
2108
+ � ˙Mpoly
2109
+ ˙Mmono
2110
+
2111
+ 2D,Hill
2112
+ =
2113
+ 3(1− p)
2114
+ 14−5q−3k
2115
+ �Stmax
2116
+ St
2117
+ �2/3
2118
+ .
2119
+ (61)
2120
+ For MRN (k = 3.5), q = 0, and St = Stmax, this yields
2121
+ � ˙Mpoly
2122
+ ˙Mmono
2123
+ �k=3.5,q=0
2124
+ 2D,Hill
2125
+ = 3
2126
+ 7,
2127
+ (62)
2128
+ that is, about 43% of the monodisperse. Deviations from this
2129
+ number are due to not all pebbles being in the 2D Hill regime.
2130
+ For large enough seed mass, the deviations should be small,
2131
+ as indeed it is seen in the plots of Figs. 3 and 5.
2132
+ 4.2. Analytical Polydisperse 3D Bondi accretion
2133
+ The Bondi accretion in the 3D regime limit is found by
2134
+ generalizing Eq. (29) with ρd0 given by Eq. (39)
2135
+ ˙M3D,Bondi = 4πRB∆v2
2136
+
2137
+ ×
2138
+ � amax
2139
+ 0
2140
+ St e−2ψm(a) f(a)
2141
+
2142
+ 1+2
2143
+
2144
+ StΩRB
2145
+ ∆v
2146
+ �1/2
2147
+ e−ψ
2148
+
2149
+ da,
2150
+ (63)
2151
+ where we use the shorthand notation
2152
+ ψ ≡ χ[St/(Ωtp)]γ.
2153
+ (64)
2154
+ We will split Eq. (63) into two integrals
2155
+ ˙M3D,Bondi = 4πRB∆v2
2156
+
2157
+ �� amax
2158
+ 0
2159
+ e−2ψ St m(a) f(a) da
2160
+ + 2
2161
+ �ΩRB
2162
+ ∆v
2163
+ �1/2 � amax
2164
+ 0
2165
+ e−3ψ St3/2 m(a) f(a) da
2166
+
2167
+ .
2168
+ (65)
2169
+ The function f(a) has a dependency on
2170
+
2171
+ 1+St/α, which
2172
+ makes these functions non-integrable sauf specific cases. We
2173
+
2174
+ POLYDISPERSE PEBBLE ACCRETION
2175
+ 13
2176
+ will thus use the following approximation, valid at x → 0 and
2177
+ x → ∞
2178
+
2179
+ 1+x ≈ 1+√x.
2180
+ (66)
2181
+ While the error incurred with this approximation at x ≈ 1
2182
+ can be large, we are interested in the definite integral from
2183
+ 0 to xmax. In this case, the error decreases if the range of
2184
+ integration is large enough, tending to zero for xmax → ∞, as
2185
+ shown in Fig. 10. Confident in the accuracy of Eq. (66), we
2186
+ write the approximate solution
2187
+ ˙M3D,Bondi ≈ 3(1− p)ZΣgRB∆v2
2188
+
2189
+ 2πHgΩρ(0)
2190
+ • a4−k
2191
+ max
2192
+ ×
2193
+ �� amax
2194
+ 0
2195
+ e−2ψ St m(a) a−kda
2196
+ + α−1/2
2197
+ � amax
2198
+ 0
2199
+ e−2ψ St3/2 m(a) a−kda
2200
+ + 2
2201
+ �ΩRB
2202
+ ∆v
2203
+ �1/2 � amax
2204
+ 0
2205
+ e−3ψ St3/2 m(a) a−kda
2206
+ + 2
2207
+ �ΩRB
2208
+ α∆v
2209
+ �1/2 � amax
2210
+ 0
2211
+ e−3ψ St2 m(a) a−kda
2212
+
2213
+ .(67)
2214
+ The four integrals are of the form below, for which there
2215
+ is an analytical solution in terms of lower incomplete gamma
2216
+ functions
2217
+ � amax
2218
+ 0
2219
+ e− jasabda = γl
2220
+ � b+1
2221
+ s , jas
2222
+ max
2223
+
2224
+ sj(b+1)/s
2225
+ .
2226
+ (68)
2227
+ We thus write the solution of Eq. (67)
2228
+ ˙M3D,Bondi ≈C1
2229
+ γl
2230
+ � b1+1
2231
+ s , j1as
2232
+ max
2233
+
2234
+ sj(b1+1)/s
2235
+ 1
2236
+ +C2
2237
+ γl
2238
+ � b2+1
2239
+ s , j2as
2240
+ max
2241
+
2242
+ sj(b2+1)/s
2243
+ 2
2244
+ +
2245
+ C3
2246
+ γl
2247
+ � b3+1
2248
+ s , j3as
2249
+ max
2250
+
2251
+ sj(b3+1)/s
2252
+ 3
2253
+ +C4
2254
+ γl
2255
+ � b4+1
2256
+ s , j4as
2257
+ max
2258
+
2259
+ sj(b4+1)/s
2260
+ 4
2261
+ , (69)
2262
+ where the coefficients are
2263
+ 10
2264
+ 6
2265
+ 10
2266
+ 3
2267
+ 100
2268
+ 103
2269
+ 106
2270
+ xmax
2271
+ 1.0
2272
+ 1.1
2273
+ 1.2
2274
+ 1.3
2275
+ 1.4
2276
+ xmax
2277
+ 0
2278
+ 1 +
2279
+ x dx
2280
+ xmax
2281
+ 0
2282
+ 1 + x dx
2283
+ Figure 10. Approximating
2284
+
2285
+ 1+x in by 1+√x (the asymptotic ex-
2286
+ pansion for x → 0 and x → ∞), to make the sedimented midplane
2287
+ distribution integrable analytically. As long as the function is inte-
2288
+ grated to a large value of xmax, the error incurred is small.
2289
+ s =γ(1−q)
2290
+ (70)
2291
+ b1 =4−2q−k
2292
+ (71)
2293
+ b2 = b3 =(9−5q−2k)/2
2294
+ (72)
2295
+ b4 =5−3q−k
2296
+ (73)
2297
+ St′ =
2298
+ π
2299
+ 2Σg
2300
+ ρ(0)
2301
+ • aq
2302
+ max
2303
+ (74)
2304
+ j′ =χ
2305
+ � St′
2306
+ Ωtp
2307
+ �γ
2308
+ (75)
2309
+ j1 = j2 =2j′
2310
+ (76)
2311
+ j3 = j4 =3j′
2312
+ (77)
2313
+ m′ = 4π
2314
+ 3 ρ(0)
2315
+ • aq
2316
+ max
2317
+ (78)
2318
+ K = 3(1− p)ZΣgRB∆v2
2319
+
2320
+ 2πHgΩρ(0)
2321
+ • a4−k
2322
+ max
2323
+ (79)
2324
+ C1 =KSt′m′
2325
+ (80)
2326
+ C2 =KSt′3/2m′α−1/2
2327
+ (81)
2328
+ C3 =2KSt′3/2m′
2329
+ �ΩRB
2330
+ ∆v
2331
+ �1/2
2332
+ (82)
2333
+ C4 =2KSt′2m′
2334
+ �ΩRB
2335
+ α∆v
2336
+ �1/2
2337
+ (83)
2338
+ Fig. 11 shows that the agreement between the numerical
2339
+ integration of Eq. (37) and the analytical solutions (Eq. (60)
2340
+ and Eq. (69)) is excellent in the range of validity. Having
2341
+ Eq. (60) and Eq. (69) as analytical expressions is of great
2342
+ interest for future studies including pebble accretion analyti-
2343
+ cally, instead of having to integrate the mass accretion rates
2344
+ numerically with the particle size distributions.
2345
+
2346
+ 14
2347
+ LYRA ET AL.
2348
+ 10
2349
+ 6
2350
+ 10
2351
+ 5
2352
+ 10
2353
+ 4
2354
+ 10
2355
+ 3
2356
+ 10
2357
+ 2
2358
+ 10
2359
+ 1
2360
+ 100
2361
+ 101
2362
+ Mp/MEarth
2363
+ 10
2364
+ 13
2365
+ 10
2366
+ 11
2367
+ 10
2368
+ 9
2369
+ 10
2370
+ 7
2371
+ 10
2372
+ 5
2373
+ 10
2374
+ 3
2375
+ 10
2376
+ 1
2377
+ M (M
2378
+ /yr)
2379
+ Polydisperse Numerical vs Analytical - 20AU - amax=1 cm
2380
+ Actual
2381
+ Hill (numerical)
2382
+ Hill 2D Analytical
2383
+ Bondi (numerical)
2384
+ Bondi 3D Analytical
2385
+ Figure 11. Agreement between the numerically calculated poly-
2386
+ disperse pebble accretion rate and the analytical solutions for 2D
2387
+ Hill accretion Eq. (60) and 3D Bondi accretion Eq. (69). While the
2388
+ Hill solution is exact, the Bondi solution is approximate. Yet, the
2389
+ agreement seen is excellent, because the best accreted pebbles in
2390
+ this regime are in the 3D range.
2391
+ 10
2392
+ 6
2393
+ 10
2394
+ 5
2395
+ 10
2396
+ 4
2397
+ 10
2398
+ 3
2399
+ 10
2400
+ 2
2401
+ 10
2402
+ 1
2403
+ 100
2404
+ 101
2405
+ Mp/MEarth
2406
+ 10
2407
+ 15
2408
+ 10
2409
+ 13
2410
+ 10
2411
+ 11
2412
+ 10
2413
+ 9
2414
+ 10
2415
+ 7
2416
+ 10
2417
+ 5
2418
+ 10
2419
+ 3
2420
+ M (M
2421
+ /yr)
2422
+ Polydisperse - 20AU - amax=1.0 cm - Effect of k
2423
+ mono
2424
+ k=0.0
2425
+ k=2.0
2426
+ k=3.0
2427
+ k=3.5
2428
+ k=3.9
2429
+ Figure 12. Effect of varying the slope k of the grain size distribu-
2430
+ tion. The Hill regime is relatively insensitive to k, as this regime
2431
+ is dominated by the largest grains. For Bondi accretion, the mass
2432
+ accretion rates increase significantly as the slope steepens.
2433
+ 5. EFFECT OF SLOPE K OF GRAIN SIZE
2434
+ DISTRIBUTION
2435
+ So far we have considered only the MRN value for the
2436
+ index k of the grain size distribution (Mathis et al. 1977),
2437
+ but this index should depend on the collisional evolution, ve-
2438
+ locities, and material strength of the pebbles (Kobayashi &
2439
+ Tanaka 2010; Kobayashi et al. 2016). Having found the ana-
2440
+ lytical solution for the accretion rates, we can more easily de-
2441
+ termine the impact of varying this parameter, which we show
2442
+ in Fig. 12. As the slope steepens, the mass accretion rate de-
2443
+ creases in the Hill regime. Compared to monodisperse, the
2444
+ effect is small, but accelerates as k approaches 4. This insen-
2445
+ sitivity is expected, as the Hill regime is dominated by the
2446
+ larger grains. The effect on mass accretion rate is more pro-
2447
+ nounced for the Bondi regime, as expected, as the amount
2448
+ of mass in different grain sizes more strongly affects this ac-
2449
+ cretion regime. As the slope steepens and more mass is made
2450
+ available in small grain sizes, the accretion rates onto smaller
2451
+ planetesimal seeds increases, although the effect is nonlinear.
2452
+ 6. LIMITATIONS
2453
+ We are limited in this work by the vast expanses of the pa-
2454
+ rameter space and by the circular restricted 3-body problem
2455
+ solution that forms for the underlying assumption of the gas
2456
+ and pebble flow. While the former would be a valiant endeav-
2457
+ our, it is not the scope of this work to derive results applicable
2458
+ to all possible situations, but to derive the model in first place.
2459
+ As such, we kept our equations general in metallicity, inter-
2460
+ nal density, and grain size distribution, but apply it mostly for
2461
+ Z = 0.01, ρ(0)
2462
+ • = 3.5 g cm−3, q = 0. These parameters will vary
2463
+ with dust drift (lower the metallicity), composition (varying
2464
+ the internal density if ices or silicates), and porosity.
2465
+ As for going beyond the circular restricted 3-body prob-
2466
+ lem, recently the impact of the gravity of the planetary seed
2467
+ on the accretion flow has been calculated from hydrody-
2468
+ namical simulations (Okamura & Kobayashi 2021), for the
2469
+ Hill regime (Kuwahara & Kurokawa 2020a) and for the
2470
+ Bondi regime (Kuwahara & Kurokawa 2020b). In the Bondi
2471
+ regime, the trajectories are modified for St ≲ 10−3, with the
2472
+ gas flow reducing the accretion rate. Thus, Eq. (45) is over-
2473
+ estimated for small St. We find that the best accreted peb-
2474
+ bles, that give the bulk of the boost in Bondi accretion, are
2475
+ slightly above the St ∼ 10−3 transition found by (Kuwahara
2476
+ & Kurokawa 2020b); as such, this aspect of our results are
2477
+ not severely affected by the planet-induced flow.
2478
+ 7. CONCLUSION
2479
+ In this paper, we worked out the theory of polydisperse
2480
+ pebble accretion, finding analytical solutions when possible.
2481
+ Our main findings are as follows:
2482
+ • We find that polydisperse Bondi accretion is 1-2 or-
2483
+ ders of magnitudes more efficient than in the monodis-
2484
+ perse case, This is because the best-accreted pebbles
2485
+ in the Bondi regime are those of friction time similar
2486
+ to Bondi time, not the largest pebbles present. The
2487
+ large pebbles, although dominating the mass budget,
2488
+ are weakly coupled across the Bondi radius and thus
2489
+ accrete poorly. The pebbles that are optimal for Bondi
2490
+ accretion may contribute less to the mass budget, but
2491
+ their enhanced accretion significantly impacts the mass
2492
+ accretion rate.
2493
+ • The onset of polydisperse pebble accretion is extended
2494
+ by 1-2 orders of magnitude lower in mass compared to
2495
+ monodisperse, for the same reason. The onset of peb-
2496
+ ble accretion with Myr-timescales reaches 100-350 km
2497
+
2498
+ POLYDISPERSE PEBBLE ACCRETION
2499
+ 15
2500
+ sized objects depending on stellocentric distances and
2501
+ disk model. For the model considered, Bondi accretion
2502
+ on Myr timescales, within the lifetime of the disk, is
2503
+ possible on top of 10−6M⊕ (100 km) seeds up to 4 AU,
2504
+ on top of 10−5M⊕ (200 km) seeds up to 10 AU, and
2505
+ on 10−4M⊕ (350 km) seeds up to 30 AU. A model 10
2506
+ times more massive doubles these distances.
2507
+ • In all models considered, at 40 AU a 100 km seed has
2508
+ growth time over 100 Myr, and should thus remain
2509
+ as planetesimals, in accordance with the existence of
2510
+ the cold classical Kuiper Belt population, presumably
2511
+ undisturbed planetesimals.
2512
+ • We find the analytical solution of the stratification in-
2513
+ tegral, and thus the exact solution for the 3D-2D tran-
2514
+ sition (Eq. 35),
2515
+ • We find analytical solutions for the polydisperse 2D
2516
+ Hill (Eq. 60) and 3D Bondi regime (Eq. 69). For the
2517
+ MRN distribution, the Hill accretion is a factor 3/7
2518
+ (about 42%) as efficient in polydisperse than monodis-
2519
+ perse.
2520
+ The fact that Myr-growth timescales, within the lifetime of
2521
+ the disk, is possible for polydisperse pebble accretion onto
2522
+ 100-350 km seeds over a significant range of the parameter
2523
+ space, has significant implications. This mass range over-
2524
+ laps with the high mass end of the planetesimal initial mass
2525
+ function (Johansen et al. 2015; Schäfer et al. 2017; Li et al.
2526
+ 2019), and thus pebble accretion is possible directly follow-
2527
+ ing formation by streaming instability, removing the need for
2528
+ planetesimal accretion. This conclusion is supported by the
2529
+ lack of of craters generated by 1-2 km on Pluto (Singer et al.
2530
+ 2019), and recent findings by Lorek & Johansen (2022) that
2531
+ planetesimal accretion are not able to sustain accretion rates
2532
+ beyond 5 AU.
2533
+ While we do most of our numerical solutions with con-
2534
+ stant ρ•, we keep the analytical solutions general for varying
2535
+ this parameter, expecting that smaller pebbles should be of
2536
+ lower density, and the bigger pebbles of higher density, re-
2537
+ flecting different compositions (Morales et al. 2016). We no-
2538
+ tice that as the distance increases, the pebble size that maxi-
2539
+ mizes pebble accretion is increasingly smaller. This implies
2540
+ the possibility of a two-mode formation of Kuiper belt ob-
2541
+ jects: streaming instability of the largest pebbles forming icy
2542
+ objects of the order of ≳ 100 km in diameter, followed by
2543
+ pebble accretion leading to objects of the order of 1000 km,
2544
+ where silicates are incorporated mostly at the pebble accre-
2545
+ tion stage, due to their low Stokes number. This scenario
2546
+ would lead to a different composition for the smaller objects,
2547
+ mostly formed by ice streaming instability, and the larger ob-
2548
+ jects, grown by ice and silicate pebble accretion on top of
2549
+ the icy planetesimal seeds. A continuum of rock-to-ice frac-
2550
+ tion should be produced. Indeed a trend is clear in the Kuiper
2551
+ belt, of constant density around 0.5 g cm−3 for the smaller ob-
2552
+ jects (diameter less than 500 km), and increasing for larger
2553
+ objects (Brown 2012; Grundy et al. 2015; McKinnon et al.
2554
+ 2017). We will explore how our findings in this paper can
2555
+ reproduce this result in a future work.
2556
+ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
2557
+ WL acknowledges support from the NASA Theoretical
2558
+ and Computational Astrophysical Networks (TCAN) via
2559
+ grant 80NSSC21K0497, from the NASA Emerging Worlds
2560
+ program via grant 22-EW22-0005, and by NSF via grant
2561
+ AST-2007422.
2562
+ AJ is supported by the Swedish Research
2563
+ Council (Project Grant 2018-04867), the Danish National
2564
+ Research Foundation (DNRF Chair grant DNRF159), and
2565
+ the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (Wallenberg
2566
+ Academy Fellow Grant 2017.0287). A.J. further thanks the
2567
+ European Research Council (ERC Consolidator Grant 724
2568
+ 687-PLANETESYS), the Göran Gustafsson Foundation for
2569
+ Research in Natural Sciences and Medicine, and the Wallen-
2570
+ berg Foundation (Wallenberg Scholar KAW 2019.0442) for
2571
+ research support. MHC is supported by grant 22-EW22-0005
2572
+ from the NASA Emerging Worlds program. We acknowl-
2573
+ edge conversations with Andrew Youdin, Jake Simon, Orkan
2574
+ Umurhan, Debanjan Sengupta, and Daniel Carrera.
2575
+ REFERENCES
2576
+ Andama, G., Ndugu, N., Anguma, S. K., & Jurua, E. 2022,
2577
+ MNRAS, 510, 1298
2578
+ Appelgren, J., Lambrechts, M., & Johansen, A. 2020, A&A, 638,
2579
+ A156
2580
+ Birnstiel, T., Klahr, H., & Ercolano, B. 2012, A&A, 539, A148
2581
+ Bitsch, B., Izidoro, A., Johansen, A., Raymond, S. N., Morbidelli,
2582
+ A., Lambrechts, M., & Jacobson, S. A. 2019a, arXiv e-prints
2583
+ Bitsch, B., Raymond, S. N., & Izidoro, A. 2019b, A&A, 624, A109
2584
+ Blum, J., & Wurm, G. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 21
2585
+ Bondi, H., & Hoyle, F. 1944, MNRAS, 104, 273
2586
+ Brauer, F., Dullemond, C. P., & Henning, T. 2008, A&A, 480, 859
2587
+ Brown, M. E. 2012, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary
2588
+ Sciences, 40, 467
2589
+ Carrera, D., Johansen, A., & Davies, M. B. 2015, A&A, 579, A43
2590
+ Chen, K., & Lin, M.-K. 2020, ApJ, 891, 132
2591
+
2592
+ 16
2593
+ LYRA ET AL.
2594
+ Drazkowska, J., Bitsch, B., Lambrechts, M., Mulders, G. D.,
2595
+ Harsono, D., Vazan, A., Liu, B., Ormel, C. W., Kretke, K., &
2596
+ Morbidelli, A. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2203.09759
2597
+ Dr ˛a˙zkowska, J., Stammler, S. M., & Birnstiel, T. 2021, A&A, 647,
2598
+ A15
2599
+ Dubrulle, B., Morfill, G., & Sterzik, M. 1995, Icarus, 114, 237
2600
+ Dullemond, C. P., & Dominik, C. 2005, A&A, 434, 971
2601
+ Flock, M., & Mignone, A. 2021, A&A, 650, A119
2602
+ Geretshauser, R. J., Speith, R., Güttler, C., Krause, M., & Blum, J.
2603
+ 2010, A&A, 513, A58
2604
+ Grundy, W. M., Porter, S. B., Benecchi, S. D., Roe, H. G., Noll,
2605
+ K. S., Trujillo, C. A., Thirouin, A., Stansberry, J. A., Barker, E.,
2606
+ & Levison, H. F. 2015, Icarus, 257, 130
2607
+ Guilera, O. M., Sándor, Z., Ronco, M. P., Venturini, J., & Miller
2608
+ Bertolami, M. M. 2020, A&A, 642, A140
2609
+ Güttler, C., Blum, J., Zsom, A., Ormel, C. W., & Dullemond, C. P.
2610
+ 2010, A&A, 513, A56
2611
+ Güttler, C., Krause, M., Geretshauser, R. J., Speith, R., & Blum, J.
2612
+ 2009, ApJ, 701, 130
2613
+ Hirashita, H., & Kobayashi, H. 2013, Earth, Planets and Space, 65,
2614
+ 1083
2615
+ Hoyle, F., & Lyttleton, R. A. 1939, Proceedings of the Cambridge
2616
+ Philosophical Society, 35, 405
2617
+ Ida, S., Guillot, T., & Morbidelli, A. 2016, A&A, 591, A72
2618
+ Izidoro, A., Bitsch, B., Raymond, S. N., Johansen, A., Morbidelli,
2619
+ A., Lambrechts, M., & Jacobson, S. A. 2021, A&A, 650, A152
2620
+ Johansen, A., & Bitsch, B. 2019, A&A, 631, A70
2621
+ Johansen, A., & Lacerda, P. 2010, MNRAS, 404, 475
2622
+ Johansen, A., & Lambrechts, M. 2017, Annual Review of Earth
2623
+ and Planetary Sciences, 45, 359
2624
+ Johansen, A., Mac Low, M.-M., Lacerda, P., & Bizzarro, M. 2015,
2625
+ Science Advances, 1, 1500109
2626
+ Johansen, A., Oishi, J. S., Mac Low, M.-M., Klahr, H., Henning,
2627
+ T., & Youdin, A. 2007, Nature, 448, 1022
2628
+ Johansen, A., Ronnet, T., Bizzarro, M., Schiller, M., Lambrechts,
2629
+ M., Nordlund, A., & Lammer, H. 2021, Science Advances, 7,
2630
+ eabc0444
2631
+ Johansen, A., & Youdin, A. 2007, ApJ, 662, 627
2632
+ Klahr, H., & Schreiber, A. 2021, ApJ, 911, 9
2633
+ Klahr, H. H., & Henning, T. 1997, Icarus, 128, 213
2634
+ Kobayashi, H., & Tanaka, H. 2010, Icarus, 206, 735
2635
+ Kobayashi, H., Tanaka, H., & Okuzumi, S. 2016, ApJ, 817, 105
2636
+ Kowalik, K., Hanasz, M., Wólta´nski, D., & Gawryszczak, A. 2013,
2637
+ MNRAS, 434, 1460
2638
+ Krapp, L., Benítez-Llambay, P., Gressel, O., & Pessah, M. E. 2019,
2639
+ ApJL, 878, L30
2640
+ Krijt, S., Ormel, C. W., Dominik, C., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2015,
2641
+ A&A, 574, A83
2642
+ Kusaka, T., Nakano, T., & Hayashi, C. 1970, Progress of
2643
+ Theoretical Physics, 44, 1580
2644
+ Kuwahara, A., & Kurokawa, H. 2020a, A&A, 633, A81
2645
+ —. 2020b, A&A, 643, A21
2646
+ Lambrechts, M., & Johansen, A. 2012, A&A, 544, A32
2647
+ —. 2014, A&A, 572, A107
2648
+ Lambrechts, M., Johansen, A., & Morbidelli, A. 2014, A&A, 572,
2649
+ A35
2650
+ Lambrechts, M., Morbidelli, A., Jacobson, S. A., Johansen, A.,
2651
+ Bitsch, B., Izidoro, A., & Raymond, S. N. 2019, arXiv e-prints
2652
+ Li, R., & Youdin, A. N. 2021, ApJ, 919, 107
2653
+ Li, R., Youdin, A. N., & Simon, J. B. 2019, ApJ, 885, 69
2654
+ Lin, M.-K. 2021, ApJ, 907, 64
2655
+ Liu, B., Lambrechts, M., Johansen, A., Pascucci, I., & Henning, T.
2656
+ 2020, A&A, 638, A88
2657
+ Lorek, S., & Johansen, A. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2208.01902
2658
+ Lynden-Bell, D., & Pringle, J. E. 1974, MNRAS, 168, 603
2659
+ Lyra, W., Johansen, A., Klahr, H., & Piskunov, N. 2008, A&A,
2660
+ 491, L41
2661
+ Lyra, W., & Kuchner, M. 2013, Nature, 499, 184
2662
+ Lyra, W., & Lin, M.-K. 2013, ApJ, 775, 17
2663
+ Mathis, J. S., Rumpl, W., & Nordsieck, K. H. 1977, ApJ, 217, 425
2664
+ McKinnon, W. B., Stern, S. A., Weaver, H. A., Nimmo, F.,
2665
+ Bierson, C. J., Grundy, W. M., Cook, J. C., Cruikshank, D. P.,
2666
+ Parker, A. H., Moore, J. M., Spencer, J. R., Young, L. A., Olkin,
2667
+ C. B., Ennico Smith, K., New Horizons Geology, G., Imaging,
2668
+ & Composition Theme Teams. 2017, Icarus, 287, 2
2669
+ McNally, C. P., Lovascio, F., & Paardekooper, S.-J. 2021,
2670
+ MNRAS, 502, 1469
2671
+ Morales, F. Y., Bryden, G., Werner, M. W., & Stapelfeldt, K. R.
2672
+ 2016, ApJ, 831, 97
2673
+ Nakagawa, Y., Nakazawa, K., & Hayashi, C. 1981, Icarus, 45, 517
2674
+ Nesvorný, D., Li, R., Youdin, A. N., Simon, J. B., & Grundy,
2675
+ W. M. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 349
2676
+ Okamura, T., & Kobayashi, H. 2021, ApJ, 916, 109
2677
+ Ormel, C. W. 2017, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library,
2678
+ Vol. 445, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, ed.
2679
+ M. Pessah & O. Gressel, 197
2680
+ Ormel, C. W., & Klahr, H. H. 2010, A&A, 520, A43
2681
+ Paardekooper, S.-J., McNally, C. P., & Lovascio, F. 2020,
2682
+ MNRAS, 499, 4223
2683
+ Pollack, J. B., Hollenbach, D., Beckwith, S., Simonelli, D. P.,
2684
+ Roush, T., & Fong, W. 1994, ApJ, 421, 615
2685
+ Raymond, S. N., Quinn, T., & Lunine, J. I. 2004, Icarus, 168, 1
2686
+ Safronov, V. S. 1972, Evolution of the protoplanetary cloud and
2687
+ formation of the earth and planets.
2688
+ Schäfer, U., Johansen, A., & Banerjee, R. 2020, A&A, 635, A190
2689
+ Schäfer, U., Yang, C.-C., & Johansen, A. 2017, A&A, 597, A69
2690
+ Schaffer, N., Yang, C.-C., & Johansen, A. 2018, A&A, 618, A75
2691
+ Shakura, N. I., & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337
2692
+ Simon, M. N., Pascucci, I., Edwards, S., Feng, W., Gorti, U.,
2693
+ Hollenbach, D., Rigliaco, E., & Keane, J. T. 2016, ApJ, 831, 169
2694
+
2695
+ POLYDISPERSE PEBBLE ACCRETION
2696
+ 17
2697
+ Singer, K. N., McKinnon, W. B., Gladman, B., Greenstreet, S.,
2698
+ Bierhaus, E. B., Stern, S. A., Parker, A. H., Robbins, S. J.,
2699
+ Schenk, P. M., Grundy, W. M., Bray, V. J., Beyer, R. A., Binzel,
2700
+ R. P., Weaver, H. A., Young, L. A., Spencer, J. R., Kavelaars,
2701
+ J. J., Moore, J. M., Zangari, A. M., Olkin, C. B., Lauer, T. R.,
2702
+ Lisse, C. M., Ennico, K., New Horizons Geology, G., Team, I.
2703
+ S. T., New Horizons Surface Composition Science Theme Team,
2704
+ & New Horizons Ralph and LORRI Teams. 2019, Science, 363,
2705
+ 955
2706
+ Squire, J., & Hopkins, P. F. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 1239
2707
+ Suyama, T., Wada, K., & Tanaka, H. 2008, ApJ, 684, 1310
2708
+ Suyama, T., Wada, K., Tanaka, H., & Okuzumi, S. 2012, ApJ, 753,
2709
+ 115
2710
+ Thommes, E. W., Duncan, M. J., & Levison, H. F. 2003, Icarus,
2711
+ 161, 431
2712
+ Tominaga, R. T., Inutsuka, S.-i., & Kobayashi, H. 2021, ApJ, 923,
2713
+ 34
2714
+ Venturini, J., Guilera, O. M., Ronco, M. P., & Mordasini, C. 2020,
2715
+ A&A, 644, A174
2716
+ Visser, R. G., Dr ˛a˙zkowska, J., & Dominik, C. 2021, A&A, 647,
2717
+ A126
2718
+ Yang, C.-C., & Johansen, A. 2014, ApJ, 792, 86
2719
+ Yang, C. C., Johansen, A., & Carrera, D. 2017, A&A, 606, A80
2720
+ Yang, C.-C., Mac Low, M.-M., & Johansen, A. 2018, ApJ, 868, 27
2721
+ Yang, C.-C., & Zhu, Z. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 5538
2722
+ Youdin, A., & Johansen, A. 2007, ApJ, 662, 613
2723
+ Youdin, A. N., & Goodman, J. 2005, ApJ, 620, 459
2724
+ Youdin, A. N., & Lithwick, Y. 2007, Icarus, 192, 588
2725
+ Zhu, Z., & Yang, C.-C. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 467
2726
+ Zsom, A., Ormel, C. W., Güttler, C., Blum, J., & Dullemond, C. P.
2727
+ 2010, A&A, 513, A57
2728
+
P9E2T4oBgHgl3EQfVwcE/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
P9FRT4oBgHgl3EQf6Tj7/content/tmp_files/2301.13676v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,803 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Validating dark energy models using polarised Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect with
2
+ large-angle CMB temperature and E-mode polarization anisotropies
3
+ Hiroto Kondo1,∗ Kiyotomo Ichiki1,2, Hiroyuki Tashiro1, and Kenji Hasegawa1
4
+ 1Graduate School of Science, Division of Particle and Astrophysical Science,
5
+ Nagoya University, Chikusa-Ku, Nagoya, 464-8602, Japan
6
+ 2Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute for the Origin of Particles and the Universe,
7
+ Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8602, Japan
8
+ (Dated: February 1, 2023)
9
+ The tomography of the polarized Sunyaev-Zeldvich effect due to free electrons of galaxy clusters
10
+ can be used to constrain the nature of dark energy because CMB quadrupoles at different redshifts
11
+ as the polarization source are sensitive to the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect. Here we show that the
12
+ low multipoles of the temperature and E-mode polarization anisotropies from the all-sky CMB can
13
+ improve the constraint further through the correlation between them and the CMB quadrupoles
14
+ viewed from the galaxy clusters. Using a Monte-Carlo simulation, we find that low multipoles of
15
+ the temperature and E-mode polarization anisotropies potentially improve the constraint on the
16
+ equation of state of dark energy parameter by ∼ 17 percent.
17
+ I.
18
+ INTRODUCTION
19
+ Dark energy, which is causing the current accelerated
20
+ expansion of the universe [1, 2], has two main effects on
21
+ the temperature anisotropies of the cosmic microwave
22
+ background (CMB). One is to change the angular dis-
23
+ tance to the final scattering surface of the CMB, and the
24
+ other is the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect, which
25
+ creates new temperature fluctuations due to the decay
26
+ of the gravitational potential of the large-scale structure.
27
+ The ISW effect is a characteristic effect that indicates
28
+ that the universe is deviating from the matter-dominated
29
+ one. However, because the temperature fluctuations pro-
30
+ duced by this effect are smaller than those produced in
31
+ the early universe in the standard cosmological model
32
+ (so-called the SW effect), they are masked by the dis-
33
+ persion of the fluctuations, making it difficult to obtain
34
+ a statistically significant enough signal to approach the
35
+ nature of dark energy. Therefore, the CMB constraint on
36
+ dark energy-related parameters is weak because the ISW
37
+ effect suffers from sizable cosmic variance errors in the
38
+ CMB temperature anisotropy spectrum on large scales
39
+ [3, 4].
40
+ The Kamionkowski and Loeb method [5] is an effec-
41
+ tive way to detect the ISW effect without this cosmic
42
+ variance. This method uses the fact that the polariza-
43
+ tion angle of CMB photons scattered by free electrons in
44
+ a galaxy cluster is determined by the quadrupole tem-
45
+ perature fluctuations of the CMB as seen from that clus-
46
+ ter [6] and allow us to reconstruct the three-dimensional
47
+ density fluctuations of the universe on large scales [7–10].
48
+ While avoiding cosmic variance by fixing the realization
49
+ of the initial density fluctuations, the direct detection
50
+ of the ISW effect is possible by tomographic use of clus-
51
+ ters of galaxies at various redshifts [11–13]. Our previous
52
53
+ study using simple Monte Carlo simulations has shown
54
+ that it is possible to constrain the dark energy equation of
55
+ state parameters more accurately through the ISW effect
56
+ than conventional methods based on the power spectra
57
+ [14]. The method can also be useful for the studies of
58
+ the power asymmetry of CMB polarization and density
59
+ field [15], cosmic birefringence [16] and the reionization
60
+ optical depth [17].
61
+ In our previous study [14], we used the quadrupole
62
+ anisotropies of the CMB as a diagnostic of the ISW effect.
63
+ Specifically, we compared the quadrupole anisotropy of
64
+ our CMB estimated from the three-dimensional density
65
+ fluctuations on large scales reconstructed by the KL
66
+ method, with the actual quadrupole anisotropy that can
67
+ be directly observed by the all-sky CMB experiments
68
+ such as Planck. In fact, it has been shown that the three-
69
+ dimensionally reconstructed density fluctuations on large
70
+ scales should be correlated not only with the quadrupoles
71
+ but also with higher temperature multipoles and E-mode
72
+ polarization fluctuations on large angular scales [18].
73
+ Therefore, this paper aims to clarify to what extent the
74
+ addition of these fluctuations as diagnostics improves the
75
+ results obtained in previous studies.
76
+ In the next section, we review our method developed
77
+ in [14], and extend it by adding information on the tem-
78
+ perature and E-mode polarization anisotropies on large
79
+ angular scales. Section III presents our result of the fu-
80
+ ture constraint on the dark energy equation of state pa-
81
+ rameters based on Monte-Carlo simulations. In Section
82
+ IV, we discuss and summarize this study.
83
+ II.
84
+ METHODOLOGY
85
+ A.
86
+ CMB polarization from galaxy clusters
87
+ First, we consider the CMB polarization produced in
88
+ galaxy clusters. The polarization is created by Thomson
89
+ arXiv:2301.13676v1 [astro-ph.CO] 31 Jan 2023
90
+
91
+ 2
92
+ scattering of the free electrons in galaxy clusters with the
93
+ quadrupole component of the CMB anisotropy. There-
94
+ fore, if a galaxy cluster is at the position ⃗x in the co-
95
+ moving coordinate, we can observe the polarization from
96
+ the galaxy cluster, which is produced by the Thomson
97
+ scattering at the conformal time τx = τ0 − |⃗x| with the
98
+ present conformal τ0.
99
+ Accordingly, the observed polarization from galaxy
100
+ clusters at ⃗x can be calculated with the Stokes parameter,
101
+ Q(⃗x) and U(⃗x)
102
+ Q(⃗x) ± iU(⃗x) = −
103
+
104
+ 6
105
+ 10 τCTCMB(τx)
106
+ ×
107
+ 2
108
+
109
+ m=−2
110
+ ±2Y2m(ˆx)aT
111
+ 2m(⃗x, τx) ,
112
+ (1)
113
+ where τC
114
+ is the optical depth of the galaxy clus-
115
+ ter for Thomson scattering.
116
+ In Eq. (1) aT
117
+ 2m(⃗x, τx) is
118
+ the quadrupole component of the CMB temperature
119
+ anisotropy observed at the position ⃗x and the conformal
120
+ time τx.
121
+ Now we consider the CMB temperature anisotropy on
122
+ the position of the comoving coordinate ⃗x at the confor-
123
+ mal time τx.
124
+ The CMB temperature in the direction
125
+ ˆn at ⃗x
126
+ and τx can be decomposed into the isotropic part
127
+ and anisotropic part,
128
+ T(⃗x, ˆn, τx)
129
+ =
130
+ TCMB(⃗x, τx) +
131
+ ∆T(⃗x, ˆn, τx).
132
+ Introducing the CMB anisotropy as
133
+ ∆(⃗x, ˆn, τx)
134
+
135
+ ∆T(⃗x, ˆn, τx)/TCMB
136
+ and
137
+ we
138
+ expand
139
+ the CMB anisotropy with sperical harmonic functions
140
+ Ylm(ˆn),
141
+ ∆(⃗x, ˆn, τx) =
142
+
143
+
144
+ l=0
145
+ l
146
+
147
+ m=−l
148
+ aT
149
+ lm(⃗x, τx)Ylm(ˆn) ,
150
+ (2)
151
+ where aT
152
+ lm(⃗x, τ) is the coefficient of the spherical har-
153
+ monic expansion and the coefficinet with ℓ = 2 is the
154
+ quadrupole component aT
155
+ 2m(⃗x, τx).
156
+ On the other hand, since the CMB anisotropy is the
157
+ function of ⃗x and ˆn, we can decompose it by the plane
158
+ wave function and the spherical harmonics,
159
+ ∆(⃗x, ˆn, τ) = 4π
160
+
161
+ d3kei⃗k·⃗x
162
+
163
+
164
+ l=0
165
+ (−i)l∆T
166
+ l (⃗k, τ)
167
+ ×
168
+ l
169
+
170
+ m=−l
171
+ Y ∗
172
+ lm(ˆk)Ylm(ˆn) .
173
+ (3)
174
+ Therefore, the coefficient of the spherical harmonic ex-
175
+ pansion in Eq. (2) can be written as
176
+ aT
177
+ lm(⃗x, τx) = (−i)l4π
178
+
179
+ d3kei⃗k·⃗x∆T
180
+ l (⃗k, τx)Y ∗
181
+ lm(ˆk) . (4)
182
+ In our case, the cosmological linear perturbation the-
183
+ ory is applicable to calculate ∆T
184
+ l (⃗k, τ) in Eq. (3). Ac-
185
+ cording to the cosmological linear perturbation theory,
186
+ ∆T
187
+ l (⃗k, τ) can be obtained as
188
+ ∆T
189
+ l (⃗k, τ) = ∆T
190
+ l (k, τ)φini(⃗k) ,
191
+ (5)
192
+ where φini(⃗k) is the Fourier component of the initial cur-
193
+ vature perturbations, and ∆T
194
+ l (k, τ) is the liner transfer
195
+ function which depends on the cosmological models and
196
+ is obtained from the cosmological linear perturbation the-
197
+ ory. We calculate ∆T
198
+ l (k, τ) using a publicly available code
199
+ CAMB [19].
200
+ B.
201
+ Monte-Carlo simulation
202
+ Our aim of this paper is to study how much the KL
203
+ methods with the future CMB temperature and polariza-
204
+ tion measurement improve the constraint on the nature
205
+ of dark energy. For this purpose, we demonstrate the KL
206
+ methods by conducting the Monte Carlo simulation.
207
+ In our simulation, to realize the CMB anisotropy at
208
+ comoving position ⃗x we use transfer functions gener-
209
+ ated by the publicly available code CAMB. Throughout
210
+ this paper, we set Λ-CDM model with Ωbh2 = 0.0226,
211
+ Ωch2 = 0.112, Ωνh2 = 0.00064, h = 0.7, as the reference
212
+ cosmological models.
213
+ The first step of the simulation is to generate the ini-
214
+ tial fluctuation field φini(ki). Our initial fluctuation field
215
+ is given as a Gaussian random field with the power spec-
216
+ trum
217
+ P(k) = k3
218
+ 2π2 P(k) = As
219
+ � k
220
+ k∗
221
+ �ns−1
222
+ ,
223
+ (6)
224
+ where we set the parameters As = 2.1 × 10−9, ns = 0.96
225
+ and k∗ = 0.05.
226
+ In our methods, it is useful to employ the polar coordi-
227
+ nate in Fourier k-space. To sample the Fourier mode, we
228
+ divide the angular directions in Fourier space by Healpix
229
+ [20] with Nside = 8. This means that the whole sky is di-
230
+ vided into 768 sections. For the radial mode, we sample
231
+ 60 wave number modes uniformly in logathmical space
232
+ with a range from k = 10−5 to 10−1. Thus, the over-
233
+ all independent Fourier mode nk for this simulation is
234
+ 46080.
235
+ Second, we simulate the polarization produced in clus-
236
+ ters with the generated initial fluctuations φini(ki). In
237
+ this process, we use the transfer function ∆(k, τx) with
238
+ the fiducial equation of state of dark energy parame-
239
+ ter w = −1. In our simulation, we set the number of
240
+ galaxy clusters to Ncluster = 6000. We distribute them
241
+ randomly in the angular direction and uniformly in red-
242
+ shift ranging from z = 0 to 2. We calculate the polar-
243
+ ization, Qfiducial(⃗xi) and Ufiducial(⃗xi), produced by each
244
+ galaxy cluster at the position ⃗xi, following the procedure
245
+ described in Sec. II A. To consider the observational un-
246
+ certainties, Gaussian noise σobs/τ = 10−2 µK is added
247
+ to each Qfiducial(⃗xi) and Ufiducial(⃗xi).
248
+ Similarly, we simulate the CMB anisotropies directly
249
+ observed at the origin with the generated initial fluctua-
250
+ tions φini(ki). In both the temperature and the polariza-
251
+ tion anisotropy (E-mode), we calculate the angular com-
252
+ ponents, aT
253
+ lmfiducial aE
254
+ lmfiducial, in the range from l = 2
255
+
256
+ 3
257
+ to 9.
258
+ Here, as in the case for galaxy cluster polariza-
259
+ tion, we add Gaussian noise σobs = 10−2 µK to alms as
260
+ observational uncertainty.
261
+ Fig.1 and 2 show one realization example of the Q maps
262
+ for the polarization produced in galaxy clusters at z =
263
+ 0.01 and 0.3. The quadrupole of the CMB temperature
264
+ observed by galaxy clusters at z = 0.01 is nearly identical
265
+ to the CMB temperature quadrupole anisotropy at the
266
+ origin. Therefore, according to Eq. (1), the pattern of
267
+ the Q map on the sky is very similar to that of the CMB
268
+ temperature quadrupole anisotropy at the origin. On the
269
+ other hand, at z = 0.3, the quadrupole pattern observed
270
+ at each galaxy cluster is slightly different.
271
+ Therefore,
272
+ the generated Q map has small-scale pattern due to the
273
+ difference, although the large-scale pattern is similar to
274
+ the Q map at z = 0.01.
275
+ FIG. 1.
276
+ Example Q polarization map observed at galaxy
277
+ clusters at redshift z = 0.01.
278
+ Because they are produced
279
+ by quadrupoles that are nearly identical to the quadrupoles
280
+ we observe today, they have a quadrupole pattern.
281
+ FIG. 2. Same as Fig. 1, but at redshift z = 0.3. While fea-
282
+ tures similar to the map at z = 0.01 remain, smaller patterns
283
+ develop.
284
+ The third step is the reconstruction of the initial fluc-
285
+ tuations by the fitting of the polarization, Q and U, pro-
286
+ duced by the galaxy clusters and the CMB temperature
287
+ and polarization anisotropy, aT
288
+ lm, aE
289
+ lm, directly observed
290
+ at the origin. We estimate the initial fluctuations to min-
291
+ imize the function given by
292
+ ftot = fpol + fT + fE + fprior
293
+ (7)
294
+ Each term in the right-hand side of the equation repre-
295
+ sents the chi-square minimizations for fitting the polar-
296
+ ization of the galaxy cluster Q(xi) and U(xi), the tem-
297
+ perature anisotropy of the CMB aT
298
+ lm and the polarization
299
+ anisotropy of the CMB aE
300
+ lm, and the prior, respectively.
301
+ The chi-square minimizations for the polarization of
302
+ the galaxy cluster Q(xi) and U(xi) can be written as
303
+ fpol =
304
+ Ncluster
305
+
306
+ i=1
307
+ (Q(⃗xi) − Q(⃗xi)fiducial)2
308
+ σ2
309
+ pol
310
+ +(U(⃗xi) − U(⃗xi)fiducial)2
311
+ σ2
312
+ pol
313
+ ,
314
+ (8)
315
+ where Q(⃗xi) and U(⃗xi) is the polarization produced in
316
+ galaxy clusters at ⃗xi with the estimated initial condition
317
+ and Q(⃗xi)fiducial and U(⃗xi)fiducial is the polarization ob-
318
+ tained in the simulation with adding the Gaussian noise
319
+ with the variance σpol due to the uncertainty in the ob-
320
+ servation of Q and U from galaxy clusters.
321
+ We use CMB temperature anisotropy from l = 3 to 9
322
+ for fitting
323
+ fT =
324
+
325
+ l=3
326
+ l
327
+
328
+ m=−l
329
+ (aT
330
+ lm − aT
331
+ lmfiducial)2
332
+ σ2
333
+ T
334
+ ,
335
+ (9)
336
+ where aT
337
+ lm is the temperature anisotropy evaluated from
338
+ the estimated initial fluctuations, aT
339
+ lmfiducial is the one
340
+ obtained from the simulation, and σT is the uncertainty
341
+ in observing CMB temperature anisotropy.
342
+ For CMB polarization E-mode, l = 2 mode is also
343
+ added to the fitting function
344
+ fE =
345
+
346
+ l=2
347
+ l
348
+
349
+ m=−l
350
+ (aE
351
+ lm − aE
352
+ lmfiducial)2
353
+ σ2
354
+ E
355
+ .
356
+ (10)
357
+ where aE
358
+ lm is the E-mode polarization anisotropy evalu-
359
+ ated from the estimated initial fluctuations, aE
360
+ lmfiducial is
361
+ the one obtained from the simulation, σE is the uncer-
362
+ tainty in the observation of CMB E-mode polarization
363
+ anisotropy.
364
+ To improve the accuracy of the reconstruction, we also
365
+ adopt a Gaussian prior based on power spectrum Pφ(k).
366
+ fprior =
367
+ nk
368
+
369
+ j
370
+ R2
371
+ ini(kj)
372
+ 2P(kj) .
373
+ (11)
374
+ where R2
375
+ ini(k) is the Fourier component of the estimated
376
+ initial fluctuations.
377
+ Tuning the estimated initial fluctuations, R2
378
+ ini(k), we
379
+ search the set of R2
380
+ ini(k) which can minimize the function
381
+ f. The obtained set of R2
382
+ ini(k) is the Fourier component
383
+
384
+ Cluster Polarization Q redshift z=0.01
385
+ -1.2863e-06
386
+ 1.6662e-06Cluster Polarization Q redshift z=0.3
387
+ -1.1101e-06
388
+ 1.4673e-064
389
+ of the estimated initial fluctuations which fit the polar-
390
+ ization of the galaxy cluster and the CMB temperature
391
+ and polarization anisotropy to the values in the fiucial
392
+ mock simulation.
393
+ In this process, the transfer functions are used to calcu-
394
+ late the observable from the initial fluctuations φini(ki).
395
+ Since the transfer function depends on the cosmological
396
+ parameters, different cosmologies lead to different esti-
397
+ mates of the initial fluctuations.
398
+ In this work, we es-
399
+ timate the initial fluctuations with several dark energy
400
+ state parameters w = −1, −0.99, and −0.95 in order
401
+ to verify the statistical power for the dark energy state
402
+ parameter although the dark energy state parameter is
403
+ fixed to w = −1 in the simulation.
404
+ In the last step, we calculate the l = 2 mode temper-
405
+ ature anisotropy aT
406
+ 2m
407
+ est(0) observed at the origin using
408
+ the estimated initial fluctuations and compare it to the
409
+ true value aT
410
+ 2m
411
+ true(0) ≡ aT
412
+ 2mfiducial(0) calculated from the
413
+ mock simulation. Note that, in the fitting process, we
414
+ do not use the l = 2 mode temperature anisotropy and
415
+ reserve it for the comparison between one form the esti-
416
+ mated initial fluctuations and the mock simulation data.
417
+ Up to this point, the method has been applied to a sin-
418
+ gle mock simulation. The sequence of steps is repeated
419
+ one hundred times from the generation of the initial fluc-
420
+ tuations and makes one hundred pairs of aT
421
+ 2m
422
+ true(0) and
423
+ aT
424
+ 2m
425
+ est(0).
426
+ The generated aT
427
+ 2m
428
+ true(0) and aT
429
+ 2m
430
+ est(0) pairs should
431
+ agree within statistical error if they are generated us-
432
+ ing the same transfer function. In application to actual
433
+ observations, the cosmological parameters of the trans-
434
+ fer function used in the estimation process should match
435
+ those of the actual universe. Thus, the larger the dif-
436
+ ference between pairs generated using different transfer
437
+ functions, the more effective the method is able to con-
438
+ strain the cosmological parameters.
439
+ The accuracy of this method depends on errors in
440
+ polarization measurements, the number of galaxy clus-
441
+ ters, the optical depth of the clusters, and the redshift
442
+ errors of the clusters.
443
+ In this study, we assume the
444
+ most ideal conditions, where the polarization measure-
445
+ ment error and optical depth of the clusters are uniform
446
+ σpol/τ = 10−2 µK, and the redshift error is negligible.
447
+ The number of clusters used is assumed to be 6000 and
448
+ randomly distributed.
449
+ The error for the CMB all-sky
450
+ observation is also used as σT = σE = 10−2 µK. The
451
+ methodological, statistical uncertainty in this method is
452
+ a complex mixture of these factors and can be calculated
453
+ from the reconstruction error in the pair when the correct
454
+ transfer function including w=-1 is used in the estima-
455
+ tion.
456
+ σ2
457
+ method = 1
458
+ N
459
+ N
460
+
461
+ i=1
462
+ 1
463
+ 5
464
+
465
+ |∆aT
466
+ 20 i|2 + 2|∆aT
467
+ 21 i|2 + 2|∆aT
468
+ 22 i|2�
469
+ (12)
470
+ where N refers to the number of simulations used, and
471
+ each ∆a2m are difference of pairs
472
+ ∆a2m = aT
473
+ 2m
474
+ true(w = −1) − aT
475
+ 2m
476
+ est(w = −1). (13)
477
+ In Eq. (12), while the m = 0 component is a real number,
478
+ the m = 1, 2 components are complex numbers, so the
479
+ independent components are doubled, requiring a factor
480
+ of 2 on the right side.
481
+ In the setting of our simulation with Ncluster
482
+ =
483
+ 6000, σpol/τ = 10−2 µK, Nside = 8 and nkmode = 60,
484
+ the methodological statistical uncertainty is
485
+ σmehthod ≃ 4.0 × 10−8.
486
+ (14)
487
+ We find out that, even when not including all-sky CMB
488
+ observations of temperature fluctuations and polariza-
489
+ tion, almost the same values were obtained as the
490
+ methodological statistical uncertainty. Therefore, we can
491
+ conclude that the dominant uncertainty of this recon-
492
+ struction comes from the KL method.
493
+ To examine statistical power, we define the chi-square
494
+ statistic for the quadrupole as
495
+ χ2(w) =
496
+ 1
497
+ σ2
498
+ method
499
+
500
+ |∆aT
501
+ 20|2 + 2|∆aT
502
+ 21|2 + 2|∆aT
503
+ 22|2�
504
+ .(15)
505
+ The chi-square is an indicator to show the goodness of
506
+ fit between the cosmological model in the mock simula-
507
+ tion and the one used for estimation. In our case, if the
508
+ equation of state of dark energy, w, in the estimation is
509
+ identical to the one in the simulation, it ideally follows
510
+ the chi-square distribution with a degree of freedom of
511
+ five. The chi-square values are larger when different w is
512
+ used in the estimation process.
513
+ In other words, the cosmological parameters can be
514
+ varied and the cosmology can be restricted by compar-
515
+ ing the differences in the chi-square values ∆χ2(w) =
516
+ χ2(w) − χ2(w = −1).
517
+ In other words, through the
518
+ comparison of the difference in the chi-square values,
519
+ ∆χ2(w) = χ2(w) − χ2(w = −1), with changing w in the
520
+ estimation, we can provide the observation constraint on
521
+ w.
522
+ III.
523
+ RESULT
524
+ In the previous study, only the polarization of the
525
+ galaxy clusters was used in the fitting process to recon-
526
+ struct the initial fluctuations. In this study, we investi-
527
+ gate the improvement in statistical power for the dark
528
+ energy equation of state parameter by adding tempera-
529
+ ture anisotropy and polarization in the all-sky CMB ob-
530
+ servations.
531
+ We set the true equation-of-state parameters of dark
532
+ energy w = −1. The difference in chi-square values for
533
+ w = −0.99 is ⟨χ2(w = −0.99)⟩ = 1.14, 1.16, and 1.33
534
+ respectively only galaxy clusters polarization case, the
535
+ case with adding E-mode polarization, and the case with
536
+ adding E-mode polarization and temperature anisotropy.
537
+ We summarize the results in Table I. Fig.3 shows the
538
+ histograms of ∆χ2 with 100 realizations in each case.
539
+ Also, the difference in chi-square values for w = −0.95
540
+ is ⟨χ2(w = −0.95)⟩ = 16.90, 17.85, and 19.93 for only
541
+
542
+ 5
543
+ FIG. 3. Distribution of the difference of the chi-square statis-
544
+ tic from the 100 simulations for w = 0.99.
545
+ Different his-
546
+ tograms show the cases obtained from fitting only to the po-
547
+ larization of galaxy clusters, fitting with the E-mode, and fit-
548
+ ting with the E-mode and temperature anisotropies of all-sky
549
+ CMB observations, as indicated in the figure.
550
+ galaxy clusters polarization case, the case with adding E-
551
+ mode polarization, and the case with adding E-mode po-
552
+ larization and temperature anisotropy, respectively. We
553
+ summarize the results in Table II. Fig.4 shows the his-
554
+ tograms of ∆χ2 with 100 realizations in each case.
555
+ FIG. 4. Same as Fig. 3, but for w = 0.95.
556
+ Observable
557
+ σmehthod
558
+ ∆χ2
559
+ Only cluster polarization
560
+ 4.060 × 10−8 1.137
561
+ Cluster polarization + E-mode
562
+ 4.039 × 10−8 1.163
563
+ Cluster polarization + E&T-mode 4.014 × 10−8 1.327
564
+ TABLE I. ∆χ2 for parameters with w = −0.99
565
+ Observable
566
+ σmehthod
567
+ ∆χ2
568
+ Only cluster polarization
569
+ 4.060 × 10−8 16.90
570
+ Cluster polarization + E-mode
571
+ 4.039 × 10−8 17.85
572
+ Cluster polarization + E&T-mode 4.014 × 10−8 19.93
573
+ TABLE II. ∆χ2 for parameters with w = −0.95
574
+ For both dark energy equation of state parameters, we
575
+ obtained larger chi-square values when adding E-mode
576
+ polarization and temperature anisotropy.
577
+ This is due to the fact that E-mode polarization and
578
+ temperature anisotropy in all-sky observations are asso-
579
+ ciated with the polarization produced by galaxy clusters.
580
+ Thus, combining all-sky CMB observations with the
581
+ remote quadrupole technique using the polarization of
582
+ galaxy clusters can more strongly constrain the cosmol-
583
+ ogy.
584
+ IV.
585
+ SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION
586
+ In this paper, we study how to constrain the nature
587
+ of the dark energy using the ISW effect by combining
588
+ information about the CMB quadrupole at high redshift
589
+ obtained from the polarization of CMB photons pass-
590
+ ing through a galaxy cluster based on the KL method
591
+ with information about temperature and E-mode polar-
592
+ ization fluctuations on large angular scales at z = 0. In
593
+ conventional analyses based on power spectra, the SW
594
+ contribution, which is unrelated to the dark energy ef-
595
+ fect, acts like Gaussian noise and prevents the statistical
596
+ detection of the ISW effect [12]. In contrast, our method
597
+ can estimate and subtract the SW contribution by re-
598
+ constructing the primordial density fluctuations in three
599
+ dimensions. Thus, we can estimate the pure ISW effect
600
+ due to dark energy.
601
+ In our previous paper, to limit the equation of state
602
+ for dark energy, we used only the z = 0 quadrupole,
603
+ which is expected to correlate most with the polariza-
604
+ tion of CMB photons scattered by clusters of galaxies.
605
+ However, the polarization of CMB photons scattered by
606
+ clusters of galaxies, especially at high redshifts, should
607
+ correlate not only with the quadrupoles but also with
608
+ higher multipoles at z = 0.
609
+ Indeed, as shown in [18],
610
+ CMB polarization generated due to a galaxy cluster at a
611
+ higher redshift correlates not only with the quadrupoles
612
+ but also with higher multipoles of the current CMB tem-
613
+ perature fluctuations.
614
+ Compared with the cluster polarization-only con-
615
+ straint, our results showed that including E-mode po-
616
+ larization (l > 2) and temperature anisotropies (l > 3)
617
+ improves the constraining power for the dark energy
618
+ parameter w by 18 percent if we compare w = −1
619
+ and w = −0.95 dark energy models, assuming 6000
620
+ clusters and polarization sensitivity of σpol/τ = 10−2.
621
+ In our setup, this improvement comes almost equally
622
+ from the E-mode polarization (l > 2) and temperature
623
+
624
+ Ax2 = x2(w = - 0.99) - x2(w= - 1)
625
+ cluster polarization only
626
+ + E-mode
627
+ 8
628
+ + T & E-mode
629
+ 6
630
+ 4
631
+ 2
632
+ 0
633
+ 10-1
634
+ 100
635
+ 101
636
+ 102
637
+ 4x?Ax2 = x2(w= - 0.95) - x2(w= - 1)
638
+ 12
639
+ cluster polarization only
640
+ + E-mode
641
+ 10
642
+ + T & E-mode
643
+ 8:
644
+ 6
645
+ 4
646
+ 2
647
+ 0
648
+ 10-1
649
+ 100
650
+ 101
651
+ 102
652
+ Ax?6
653
+ anisotropies (l > 3). The improvement is due to the fact
654
+ that the information on E-mode polarization and temper-
655
+ ature anisotropy at z = 0 allowed us to solve part of the
656
+ degeneracy between the 3D density fluctuation Fourier
657
+ modes inferred from the polarization produced in galaxy
658
+ clusters.
659
+ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
660
+ This work is supported in part by the JSPS grant num-
661
+ bers 18K03616,21H04467 and JST AIP Acceleration Re-
662
+ search Grant JP20317829 and JST FOREST Program
663
+ JPMJFR20352935 (K.I.), JP21K03533, and JP21H05459
664
+ (H.T.), and JST SPRING, grant number JPMJSP2125
665
+ (H.K.).
666
+ [1] A. G. Riess, A. V. Filippenko, P. Challis, A. Clocchiatti,
667
+ A. Diercks, P. M. Garnavich, R. L. Gilliland, C. J. Hogan,
668
+ S. Jha, R. P. Kirshner, B. Leibundgut, M. M. Phillips,
669
+ D. Reiss, B. P. Schmidt, R. A. Schommer, R. C. Smith,
670
+ J. Spyromilio, C. Stubbs, N. B. Suntzeff, and J. Tonry,
671
+ AJ 116, 1009 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 [astro-ph].
672
+ [2] S. Perlmutter, G. Aldering, G. Goldhaber, R. A. Knop,
673
+ P. Nugent, P. G. Castro, S. Deustua, S. Fabbro, A. Goo-
674
+ bar, D. E. Groom, I. M. Hook, A. G. Kim, M. Y.
675
+ Kim, J. C. Lee, N. J. Nunes, R. Pain, C. R. Penny-
676
+ packer, R. Quimby, C. Lidman, R. S. Ellis, M. Irwin,
677
+ R. G. McMahon, P. Ruiz-Lapuente, N. Walton, B. Schae-
678
+ fer, B. J. Boyle, A. V. Filippenko, T. Matheson, A. S.
679
+ Fruchter, N. Panagia, H. J. M. Newberg, W. J. Couch,
680
+ and T. S. C. Project, ApJ 517, 565 (1999), arXiv:astro-
681
+ ph/9812133 [astro-ph].
682
+ [3] G. Hinshaw, D. Larson, E. Komatsu, D. N. Spergel, C. L.
683
+ Bennett, J. Dunkley, M. R. Nolta, M. Halpern, R. S.
684
+ Hill, N. Odegard, L. Page, K. M. Smith, J. L. Weiland,
685
+ B. Gold, N. Jarosik, A. Kogut, M. Limon, S. S. Meyer,
686
+ G. S. Tucker, E. Wollack, and E. L. Wright, ApJS 208,
687
+ 19 (2013), arXiv:1212.5226 [astro-ph.CO].
688
+ [4] Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ash-
689
+ down, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J.
690
+ Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, R. Battye,
691
+ K. Benabed, J. P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz,
692
+ J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet,
693
+ F. Boulanger, M. Bucher, C. Burigana, R. C. Butler,
694
+ E. Calabrese, J. F. Cardoso, J. Carron, A. Challinor,
695
+ H. C. Chiang, J. Chluba, L. P. L. Colombo, C. Combet,
696
+ D. Contreras, B. P. Crill, F. Cuttaia, P. de Bernardis,
697
+ G. de Zotti, J. Delabrouille, J. M. Delouis, E. Di
698
+ Valentino, J. M. Diego, O. Dor´e, M. Douspis, A. Ducout,
699
+ X. Dupac, S. Dusini, G. Efstathiou, F. Elsner, T. A.
700
+ Enßlin, H. K. Eriksen, Y. Fantaye, M. Farhang, J. Fer-
701
+ gusson, R. Fernandez-Cobos, F. Finelli, F. Forastieri,
702
+ M. Frailis, A. A. Fraisse, E. Franceschi, A. Frolov,
703
+ S. Galeotta, S. Galli, K. Ganga, R. T. G´enova-Santos,
704
+ M. Gerbino,
705
+ T. Ghosh,
706
+ J. Gonz´alez-Nuevo,
707
+ K. M.
708
+ G´orski, S. Gratton, A. Gruppuso, J. E. Gudmundsson,
709
+ J. Hamann, W. Handley, F. K. Hansen, D. Herranz,
710
+ S. R. Hildebrandt, E. Hivon, Z. Huang, A. H. Jaffe,
711
+ W. C. Jones, A. Karakci, E. Keih¨anen, R. Keskitalo,
712
+ K. Kiiveri, J. Kim, T. S. Kisner, L. Knox, N. Krach-
713
+ malnicoff, M. Kunz, H. Kurki-Suonio, G. Lagache, J. M.
714
+ Lamarre, A. Lasenby, M. Lattanzi, C. R. Lawrence,
715
+ M. Le Jeune, P. Lemos, J. Lesgourgues, F. Levrier,
716
+ A. Lewis, M. Liguori, P. B. Lilje, M. Lilley, V. Lind-
717
+ holm, M. L´opez-Caniego, P. M. Lubin, Y. Z. Ma,
718
+ J. F. Mac´ıas-P´erez, G. Maggio, D. Maino, N. Man-
719
+ dolesi, A. Mangilli, A. Marcos-Caballero, M. Maris,
720
+ P. G. Martin, M. Martinelli, E. Mart´ınez-Gonz´alez,
721
+ S. Matarrese, N. Mauri, J. D. McEwen, P. R. Mein-
722
+ hold, A. Melchiorri, A. Mennella, M. Migliaccio, M. Mil-
723
+ lea, S. Mitra, M. A. Miville-Deschˆenes, D. Molinari,
724
+ L. Montier, G. Morgante, A. Moss, P. Natoli, H. U.
725
+ Nørgaard-Nielsen, L. Pagano, D. Paoletti, B. Partridge,
726
+ G. Patanchon, H. V. Peiris, F. Perrotta, V. Pettorino,
727
+ F. Piacentini, L. Polastri, G. Polenta, J. L. Puget,
728
+ J. P. Rachen, M. Reinecke, M. Remazeilles, A. Renzi,
729
+ G. Rocha, C. Rosset, G. Roudier, J. A. Rubi˜no-Mart´ın,
730
+ B. Ruiz-Granados, L. Salvati, M. Sandri, M. Savelainen,
731
+ D. Scott, E. P. S. Shellard, C. Sirignano, G. Sirri, L. D.
732
+ Spencer, R. Sunyaev, A. S. Suur-Uski, J. A. Tauber,
733
+ D. Tavagnacco, M. Tenti, L. Toffolatti, M. Tomasi,
734
+ T. Trombetti, L. Valenziano, J. Valiviita, B. Van Tent,
735
+ L. Vibert, P. Vielva, F. Villa, N. Vittorio, B. D. Wandelt,
736
+ I. K. Wehus, M. White, S. D. M. White, A. Zacchei, and
737
+ A. Zonca, A&A 641, A6 (2020), arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-
738
+ ph.CO].
739
+ [5] M. Kamionkowski and A. Loeb, Phys. Rev. D 56, 4511
740
+ (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9703118 [astro-ph].
741
+ [6] N. Seto and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D 62, 123004 (2000),
742
+ arXiv:astro-ph/0009222 [astro-ph].
743
+ [7] J.
744
+ Portsmouth,
745
+ Phys.
746
+ Rev.
747
+ D
748
+ 70,
749
+ 063504
750
+ (2004),
751
+ arXiv:astro-ph/0402173 [astro-ph].
752
+ [8] E. F. Bunn, Phys. Rev. D 73, 123517 (2006), arXiv:astro-
753
+ ph/0603271 [astro-ph].
754
+ [9] L. R. Abramo and H. S. Xavier, Phys. Rev. D 75, 101302
755
+ (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0612193 [astro-ph].
756
+ [10] G.-C. Liu, K. Ichiki, H. Tashiro, and N. Sugiyama, MN-
757
+ RAS 460, L104 (2016), arXiv:1603.06166 [astro-ph.CO].
758
+ [11] A. Cooray and D. Baumann, Phys. Rev. D 67, 063505
759
+ (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0211095 [astro-ph].
760
+ [12] A. Cooray, D. Huterer, and D. Baumann, Phys. Rev. D
761
+ 69, 027301 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0304268 [astro-ph].
762
+ [13] N. Seto and E. Pierpaoli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 101302
763
+ (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0502564 [astro-ph].
764
+ [14] K. Ichiki, K. Sumiya, and G.-C. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 105,
765
+ 063507 (2022), arXiv:2202.11332 [astro-ph.CO].
766
+ [15] A.-S. Deutsch, M. C. Johnson, M. M¨unchmeyer, and
767
+ A. Terrana, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2018, 034
768
+
769
+ 7
770
+ (2018), arXiv:1705.08907 [astro-ph.CO].
771
+ [16] N.
772
+ Lee,
773
+ S.
774
+ C.
775
+ Hotinli,
776
+ and
777
+ M.
778
+ Kamionkowski,
779
+ Phys. Rev. D 106, 083518 (2022), arXiv:2207.05687
780
+ [astro-ph.CO].
781
+ [17] J. Meyers,
782
+ P. D. Meerburg,
783
+ A. van Engelen, and
784
+ N.
785
+ Battaglia,
786
+ Phys.
787
+ Rev.
788
+ D
789
+ 97,
790
+ 103505
791
+ (2018),
792
+ arXiv:1710.01708 [astro-ph.CO].
793
+ [18] T. Louis,
794
+ E. F. Bunn,
795
+ B. Wandelt, and J. Silk,
796
+ Phys. Rev. D 96, 123509 (2017), arXiv:1707.04102 [astro-
797
+ ph.CO].
798
+ [19] A. Lewis, A. Challinor, and A. Lasenby, ApJ 538, 473
799
+ (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9911177 [astro-ph].
800
+ [20] K. M. G´orski, E. Hivon, A. J. Banday, B. D. Wandelt,
801
+ F. K. Hansen, M. Reinecke, and M. Bartelmann, ApJ
802
+ 622, 759 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0409513 [astro-ph].
803
+
P9FRT4oBgHgl3EQf6Tj7/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
PNE4T4oBgHgl3EQfkQ1N/content/tmp_files/2301.05149v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1688 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ A Cognitive Evaluation of Instruction Generation Agents
2
+ tl;dr They Need Better Theory-of-Mind Capabilities
3
+ ♠Lingjun Zhao∗ and ♣Khanh Nguyen∗ and ♠♦Hal Daumé III
4
+ ♠University of Maryland–College Park
5
+ ♣Princeton University
6
+ ♦Microsoft Research
7
8
+ Abstract
9
+ We mathematically characterize the cognitive
10
+ capabilities that enable humans to effectively
11
+ guide others through natural language.
12
+ We
13
+ show that neural-network-based instruction
14
+ generation agents possess similar cognitive
15
+ capabilities, and design an evaluation scheme
16
+ for probing those capabilities.
17
+ Our results
18
+ indicate that these agents,
19
+ while capable
20
+ of effectively narrowing the search space,
21
+ poorly predict the listener’s interpretations
22
+ of their instructions and thus often fail to
23
+ select the best instructions even from a small
24
+ candidate set.
25
+ We augment the agents with
26
+ better theory-of-mind models of the listener
27
+ and obtain significant performance boost in
28
+ guiding real humans.
29
+ Yet, there remains a
30
+ considerable gap between our best agent and
31
+ human guides.
32
+ We discuss the challenges
33
+ in closing this gap, emphasizing the need to
34
+ construct better models of human behavior
35
+ when interacting with AI-based agents.
36
+ 1
37
+ Introduction
38
+ Instruction generation refers to the problem of guid-
39
+ ing humans to accomplish goals through natural
40
+ language. While being able to hold fluent chit-
41
+ chatting conversations with humans (Thoppilan
42
+ et al., 2022; OpenAI, 2022), performances of AI-
43
+ based agents in this problem are still far from per-
44
+ fect (Zhao et al., 2021; Kojima et al., 2021; Wang
45
+ et al., 2022). To build agents that communicate
46
+ pragmatically like humans, we must equip them
47
+ with cognitive capabilities similar to those of hu-
48
+ mans. Accomplishing this goal requires (i) mathe-
49
+ matically characterize the capabilities that are es-
50
+ sential for human pragmatic communication and
51
+ (ii) designing an evaluation scheme for assessing
52
+ these capabilities of AI-based agents.
53
+ In this paper, we present a framework for con-
54
+ ducting fine-grained evaluation of the communica-
55
+ tion capabilities of instruction generation agents.
56
+ ∗The first two authors contribute equally.
57
+ Our evaluation focuses on cognitive capabilities
58
+ that are known to be requisite for human-like prag-
59
+ matic communication. The outcome of the evalua-
60
+ tion indicates which cognitive capabilities require
61
+ further development and thus can help developers
62
+ direct their effort more deliberately and effectively.
63
+ Figure 1 provides an overview of our approach.
64
+ To identify the cognitive capabilities essential for
65
+ pragmatic communication, we build on two lines
66
+ of work from socio-cognitive science: Bayesian
67
+ models of cooperative communication (Wang et al.,
68
+ 2020; Goodman and Frank, 2016; Shafto et al.,
69
+ 2014) and studies on how humans implement
70
+ Bayesian reasoning (Sanborn and Chater, 2016;
71
+ Sanborn et al., 2010; Vul et al., 2014; Mamassian
72
+ et al., 2002). These models have been shown to be
73
+ capable of predicting and explaining human behav-
74
+ iors in various communication games. We propose
75
+ a framework named bounded pragmatic agent that
76
+ practically characterize the human cognitive pro-
77
+ cess for instruction generation. We show that our
78
+ framework can also describe the operation of a
79
+ broad class of AI-based agents, including neural-
80
+ network-based agents.
81
+ Interpreting AI-based
82
+ agents and humans under the same mathematical
83
+ framework enables us to quantify their differences.
84
+ We derive the optimality conditions that a bounded
85
+ pragmatic agent must satisfy in order to generate
86
+ optimally pragmatic instructions. These conditions
87
+ correspond to well-known cognitive capabilities of
88
+ humans: (i) the ability to efficiently generate rele-
89
+ vant utterances (the search capability) (Bloom and
90
+ Fischler, 1980; Gold et al., 2000; Trosborg, 2010)
91
+ and (ii) the ability to accurately simulate the lis-
92
+ tener’s interpretations of their utterances in the envi-
93
+ ronment (the theory-of-mind capability) (Premack
94
+ and Woodruff, 1978; Gopnik and Astington, 1988;
95
+ Tomasello, 2019; Call and Tomasello, 2011). We
96
+ then design an evaluation scheme for assessing
97
+ these capabilities of an agent, measuring how close
98
+ it is to satisfying our optimality conditions.
99
+ arXiv:2301.05149v1 [cs.CL] 21 Dec 2022
100
+
101
+ 0.5
102
+ How to bridge
103
+ this gap?
104
+ Repeat K times
105
+ (i) Generate candidate (search capability)
106
+ ui ~ Sbase
107
+ (ii) Evaluate candidate (ToM capability)
108
+ score(ui) = LToM(e* | ui)
109
+ Return argmaxu∈D score(u), D = { u1 ,..., uK }
110
+ ToM capability
111
+ Search capability
112
+ 𝚫search
113
+ 𝚫ToM
114
+ Human
115
+ Evaluated
116
+ agent
117
+ Human-level
118
+ candidate
119
+ generation
120
+ Human-level
121
+ candidate
122
+ evaluation
123
+ Bounded pragmatic agent
124
+ Recommendation:
125
+ ● Large 𝚫search, small 𝚫ToM ⇒ improve inference algorithm
126
+ ● Large 𝚫ToM , small 𝚫search ⇒ enhance planning module
127
+ (a)
128
+ (b)
129
+ (c)
130
+ (d)
131
+ Figure 1: An overview of our approach.
132
+ We aim
133
+ to build speaker agents that can guide humans to
134
+ accomplish goals through natural language. Standard
135
+ evaluation that computes task performance metrics
136
+ is not helpful for directing the development of the
137
+ evaluated agents (a).
138
+ We propose a mathematical
139
+ framework called “bounded pragmatic agent” that
140
+ can characterize the operations of both AI-based
141
+ and human speakers (b).
142
+ Viewing AI-based agents
143
+ and humans through this unifying lens enables us to
144
+ compare them on more fine-grained capabilities (c),
145
+ and better instruct future development of these agents
146
+ towards leveling with human performance (d).
147
+ We
148
+ evaluate
149
+ various
150
+ neural-network-based
151
+ agents1 on an instruction generation problem in
152
+ photo-realistic 3D environments (Anderson et al.,
153
+ 2018b). To evaluate each capability of an agent,
154
+ we compare it with the same agent but equipped
155
+ with an optimal version of the evaluated capability,
156
+ which is simulated by asking a human to perform
157
+ that capability for the agent. Our evaluation reveals
158
+ a crucial finding: most evaluated agents possess
159
+ 1We release our human-evaluation dataset and inter-
160
+ face at https://lingjunzhao.github.io/coop_
161
+ instruction.html.
162
+ relatively efficient search capability but inadequate
163
+ theory-of-mind capability. Specifically, on a major-
164
+ ity of test cases, the agents can find an instruction
165
+ that successfully guide humans by drawing a few
166
+ samples. But they assign incorrect probabilities to
167
+ the instructions and thus fail to select the best one
168
+ as final outputs.
169
+ We improve the theory-of-mind capability of the
170
+ evaluated agents by equipping them with an ex-
171
+ plicit pragmatic reasoning mechanism (Andreas
172
+ and Klein, 2016; Fried et al., 2017), using state-
173
+ of-the-art instruction-following agents (Magalhaes
174
+ et al., 2019; Shen et al., 2022; Hong et al., 2021) as
175
+ theory-of-mind models. We obtain significant im-
176
+ provement over the original agents, shrinking the
177
+ gap with human performance on test data by 36%.
178
+ Towards eliminating the remaining gap, we illus-
179
+ trate with empirical evidence a major challenge in
180
+ developing better theory-of-mind models. Specif-
181
+ ically, when employed, these models would be
182
+ asked to evaluate AI-generated instructions, which
183
+ may differ dramatically from human-generated in-
184
+ structions. Hence, a standard supervised-learning
185
+ training scheme that only exposes the model to
186
+ human-generated instructions would be inadequate
187
+ for learning reliable theory-of-mind models. We
188
+ thus call for the construction of novel datasets, ap-
189
+ proaches, and evaluation methods for developing
190
+ these models.
191
+ 2
192
+ Related Work
193
+ Navigation Instruction Generation.
194
+ Instruc-
195
+ tion generation has been commonly studied in navi-
196
+ gation settings (Anderson et al., 1991; Byron et al.,
197
+ 2010; Koller et al., 2010; Striegnitz et al., 2011;
198
+ Goeddel and Olson, 2012; Fried et al., 2017, 2018).
199
+ The Matterport3D simulator and the accompanying
200
+ datasets (R2R (Anderson et al., 2018b), R4R (Jain
201
+ et al., 2019), and RxR (Ku et al., 2020)) offer more
202
+ challenging settings by combining photo-realistic
203
+ scenes with long, verbally rich instructions. Recent
204
+ work on evaluating instruction generation agents
205
+ (Zhao et al., 2021) reveals the ineffectiveness of
206
+ standard learning and modeling approaches to this
207
+ problem. Wang et al. (2021) improve the accuracy
208
+ and interpretability of instructions in the RxR set-
209
+ ting. Kamath et al. (2022) leverage this model to
210
+ synthesize additional data for training instruction-
211
+ following agents. Our work offers useful principles
212
+ for improving these models.
213
+
214
+ o1o
215
+ 00Mathematical Models of Human Communica-
216
+ tion.
217
+ Human communication is a cooperative
218
+ act (Grice, 1975; Scott-Phillips, 2014; Tomasello,
219
+ 2019). Pragmatic communication in humans may
220
+ involve different cognitive capabilities like basic
221
+ understanding of language and social rules (Tros-
222
+ borg, 2010) and reasoning about the physical world
223
+ (Bender and Koller, 2020) and human behavior
224
+ (Ganaie and Mudasir, 2015; Enrici et al., 2019;
225
+ Rubio-Fernandez, 2021). Our work describes simi-
226
+ lar capabilities but provides a mathematical inter-
227
+ pretation that allows for computational evaluation
228
+ of those capabilities. Development of mathemat-
229
+ ical models of human communication have been
230
+ greatly useful for understanding human behaviors
231
+ (Ho et al., 2016; Sumers et al., 2022) and building
232
+ communication agents (Andreas and Klein, 2016;
233
+ Fried et al., 2017, 2018; , FAIR; Lin et al., 2022).
234
+ Numerous variants of these models have been pro-
235
+ posed. Wang et al. (2020) present a comprehensive
236
+ comparison of these variants and unify them under
237
+ a framework inspired by optimal transport. Since
238
+ we are interested more in characterizing general ca-
239
+ pabilities than specific implementation, the model
240
+ we propose in this work is a generalized version
241
+ capturing the essence of these models.
242
+ Evaluating Cognitive Capabilities of Neural
243
+ Networks.
244
+ A
245
+ plethora
246
+ of
247
+ benchmarks
248
+ for
249
+ evaluating the cognitive capabilities of AI-based
250
+ agents have been created, focusing on theory-of-
251
+ mind capabilities (Le et al., 2019; Nematzadeh
252
+ et al., 2018), grounding (Lachmy et al., 2021;
253
+ Udagawa and Aizawa, 2019; Haber et al., 2019),
254
+ commonsense reasoning (Talmor et al., 2018;
255
+ Levesque et al., 2012; Zellers et al., 2019; Sap
256
+ et al., 2019), etc. Recent work (Sap et al., 2022;
257
+ Hu et al., 2022) examine performance of large
258
+ language models on various cognitive tasks. They
259
+ evaluate a capability by designing language tasks
260
+ that are assumed to require the evaluated capability
261
+ to solve. This approach is limited to large language
262
+ models that can perform few-shot learning.
263
+ A
264
+ limitation of the approach is that it may not be
265
+ possible to determine whether an agent solve the
266
+ tasks in the intended way. Our evaluation scheme
267
+ follows a different principle: we mathematically
268
+ characterize exactly the capabilities we want to
269
+ evaluate, and compare agents that possess different
270
+ levels of these capabilities.
271
+ 3
272
+ Problem Setting
273
+ 3.1
274
+ Environment and Human Listener
275
+ We consider a human listener h acting in a POMDP
276
+ environment with state space S, action space Ah,
277
+ transition function Eh(st+1 | st, at), start-state
278
+ distribution Eh
279
+ 1 (s1), observation space Ω, and ob-
280
+ servation function Oh(ot+1 | st+1). An instruction
281
+ u ∈ U is an utterance consisting of words belong-
282
+ ing to a vocabulary V. The human can follow in-
283
+ structions to generate trajectories. For example, in
284
+ an indoor navigation setting, upon hearing “go the
285
+ kitchen and stop next to the oven”, a human can
286
+ walk to the specified location. A T-step trajectory
287
+ eh = (s1, oh
288
+ 1, ah
289
+ 1, · · · , sT , oh
290
+ T , ah
291
+ T ) is an execution
292
+ of an instruction. The observable part of the tra-
293
+ jectory ¯eh = (oh
294
+ 1, ah
295
+ 1, · · · , oh
296
+ T , ah
297
+ T ) is obtained by
298
+ excluding the states from eh.
299
+ To follow instructions, we imagine the human
300
+ implements a policy πh(a | ¯e, u) that takes as
301
+ input a partial observed trajectory ¯e and an in-
302
+ struction u, and outputs a distribution over actions
303
+ in Ah. Given an instruction u, a T-step trajec-
304
+ tory is generated as follows. The human starts in
305
+ s1 ∼ E1 and observes oh
306
+ 1 ∼ O(s1). At time step
307
+ t, let ¯e1:t = (oh
308
+ 1, ah
309
+ 1, · · · , oh
310
+ t ). The human chooses
311
+ ah
312
+ t ∼ πh(· | ¯e1:t, u), executes the action, and tran-
313
+ sitions to st+1 ∼ Eh(st, ah
314
+ t ). There, they perceive
315
+ oh
316
+ t+1 ∼ Oh(st+1). In the end, they issue a special
317
+ stop action aT to terminate the trajectory. We de-
318
+ fine Lh(e | u) as the probability of generating a
319
+ trajectory e according to this process. We will refer
320
+ to Lh as the real listener to distinguish it with the
321
+ theory-of-mind listener, which is a mental model
322
+ of the real listener that an agent constructs.
323
+ 3.2
324
+ Pragmatic Instruction Generation
325
+ In pragmatic instruction generation (PIGEN), the
326
+ goal is to learn a speaker agent r that generates
327
+ language instructions to guide a human listener
328
+ h to reach states in the environment. The term
329
+ “pragmatic” emphasizes that the agent generates
330
+ language in a social context to achieve a commu-
331
+ nication goal. In each PIGEN task, the speaker
332
+ agent first imagines an intended trajectory e⋆ =
333
+ (s1, or
334
+ 1, ar
335
+ 1, · · · , sT , or
336
+ T , ar
337
+ T ), which leads to the in-
338
+ tended goal state sT from the state s1 that the hu-
339
+ man is currently in. Because the human’s action
340
+ space and observation function may differ from
341
+ those of the agent, they may not be able to com-
342
+ prehend e⋆ even if it is presented to them. Thus,
343
+ the agent needs to translate the trajectory into an
344
+
345
+ instruction ˆu that the human can understand and
346
+ follow. To do so, it implements a speaker model
347
+ Sr(u | e) that takes as input a trajectory and com-
348
+ putes a distribution over instructions. The objective
349
+ of the problem can be written formally as
350
+ arg max
351
+ Sr
352
+ Ee⋆ [Lh(e⋆ | Gen(Sr, e⋆))]
353
+ (1)
354
+ where Gen(Sr, e⋆) is the process implemented by
355
+ the agent for generating an instruction.
356
+ The agent is evaluated using a dataset Deval
357
+ of held-out trajectories.
358
+ For each trajectory
359
+ e⋆
360
+ k ∈ Deval, We generate an instruction ˆuk =
361
+ GEN(Sr, e⋆
362
+ k) . The instruction is then presented
363
+ to a human listener to follow, producing a trajec-
364
+ tory eh
365
+ k ∼ Lh(· | ˆuk). The performance of the
366
+ agent, denoted by ρ(r), is the average similarity
367
+ between the human-generated trajectory and the
368
+ intended trajectory
369
+ ρ(r) ≜
370
+ 1
371
+ |Deval|
372
+
373
+ e⋆
374
+ k∈Deval
375
+ Ψ(eh
376
+ k, e⋆
377
+ k)
378
+ (2)
379
+ where Ψ is a similarity metric.
380
+ 4
381
+ Building Agents that Communicate
382
+ Pragmatically like Humans
383
+ Faced with instances of the PIGEN problem
384
+ daily, humans have evolved a highly efficient
385
+ cognitive process for solving this problem. To
386
+ build agents with a similar level of efficacy, we
387
+ propose a mathematical model characterizing the
388
+ human cognitive process for instruction generation
389
+ (§ 4.1).
390
+ We then derive the capabilities for an
391
+ agent implementing that model to optimally solve
392
+ PIGEN (§4.2). Finally, we present an evaluation
393
+ scheme for collating these capabilities on a general
394
+ class of speaker agents (§4.3).
395
+ 4.1
396
+ A Mathematical Cognitive Model of
397
+ Instruction Generation
398
+ To formulate how humans generate instructions,
399
+ we build on mathematical models of coopera-
400
+ tive communication (Wang et al., 2020; Goodman
401
+ and Frank, 2016; Shafto et al., 2014). We con-
402
+ sider a general version where a speaker agent con-
403
+ structs a pragmatic speaker model Sprag(u | e)
404
+ based on two constituents: a base speaker model
405
+ Sbase(u | e) and a theory-of-mind (ToM) listener
406
+ model LToM(e | u). The base speaker represents
407
+ general knowledge of the agent about the world and
408
+ the language it speaks. The ToM listener reflects
409
+ situated knowledge about the listener, simulating
410
+ how they would behave in the environment given
411
+ an instruction. The construction of Sprag is defined
412
+ as a Bayesian belief update that alters the initial
413
+ belief Sbase by re-weighting with LToM:
414
+ Sprag(u | e) ∝ LToM(e | u)Sbase(u | e)
415
+ (3)
416
+ The pragmatic speaker utters an instruction of
417
+ maximum probability under its model:
418
+ ˆuprag ≜ arg max
419
+ u∈U
420
+ Sprag(u | e⋆)
421
+ = arg max
422
+ u∈U
423
+ LToM(e⋆ | u)Sbase(u | e⋆) (4)
424
+ This choice reflects that the speaker wants to maxi-
425
+ mize the chance of the listener interpreting its in-
426
+ struction correctly, but it is still influenced by prior
427
+ knowledge.
428
+ While this model accounts for human behaviors
429
+ highly accurately on problems where U is a small
430
+ discrete space (Frank and Goodman, 2012), in prob-
431
+ lems where U is unbounded like PIGEN, it is un-
432
+ likely that humans, which are known to be agents
433
+ with bounded rationality (Simon, 1957), are able to
434
+ implement the full Bayesian update in the model’s
435
+ formulation. A hypothesis, which is supported by
436
+ empirical evidence, is that humans approximate
437
+ the update via Monte-Carlo sampling (Sanborn and
438
+ Chater, 2016; Sanborn et al., 2010; Vul et al., 2014;
439
+ Mamassian et al., 2002). Applying this hypothesis
440
+ to our setting, we derive a more practical model
441
+ of how human generate instructions, in which they
442
+ perform the Bayesian update on a subspace Usub of
443
+ U chosen by drawing samples from Sbase
444
+ ˆubounded-prag ≜
445
+ arg max
446
+ u ∈ Usub ⊂ U
447
+ LToM(e⋆ | u)
448
+ (5)
449
+ where Usub is a small set of candidate instructions
450
+ generated by Sbase. We call an agent that gen-
451
+ erates instructions according to Eq 5 a bounded
452
+ pragmatic speaker (Figure 2). For such a speaker,
453
+ instruction generation involves two cognitive tasks:
454
+ the candidate generation task (performed by Sbase)
455
+ and the candidate evaluation task (performed by
456
+ LToM). The former task ensures that the generation
457
+ of an instruction is efficient, while the latter
458
+ guarantees the generated instruction conveys the
459
+ intended meaning.
460
+ 4.2
461
+ Essential Cognitive Capabilities of
462
+ Pragmatic Instruction Generation Agents
463
+ What cognitive capabilities enable humans to ef-
464
+ fectively solve the PIGEN problem (section §3.2)?
465
+
466
+ Theory-of-mind
467
+ Listener Model
468
+ Base Speaker
469
+ Model
470
+
471
+ Start
472
+ Goal
473
+ Human Listener
474
+ Candidate set
475
+ u1: Walk past the stairs and
476
+ out the door that leads
477
+ outside. Wait on the porch.
478
+ u2: Walk across the living
479
+ room and out the doors on the
480
+ other side. Stop just outside
481
+ the door
482
+
483
+ e1
484
+ e2
485
+ Figure 2: The cognitive process of a bounded pragmatic speaker. The speaker implements two models: a base
486
+ speaker model and a theory-of-mind listener model. In every task, the speaker first imagines a trajectory it wants
487
+ to convey to the human listener. To reduce the search space, it then uses the base speaker to generate a small set
488
+ of relevant candidate instructions. After that, it employs the theory-of-mind model to simulate how the human
489
+ listener would follow each instruction in the candidate set. The speaker finally elects the candidate instruction that
490
+ causes the theory-of-mind listener to generate the trajectory most similar to the intended trajectory. The output
491
+ instruction is finally sent to the human listener for a real execution in the environment.
492
+ Viewing humans as bounded pragmatic agents, we
493
+ can characterize those capabilities by identifying
494
+ the requirements for a bounded pragmatic agent
495
+ to optimize the PIGEN objective (Eq 1). A gen-
496
+ eral condition is that the instruction ˆubounded-prag
497
+ selected by the agent must satisfy
498
+ ˆubounded-prag = u⋆ ≜ arg max
499
+ u
500
+ Lh(e⋆ | u)
501
+ (6)
502
+ where Lh is the real listener.
503
+ We translate this condition into conditions for the
504
+ constituent models, Sbase and LToM, of the agent.
505
+ The condition for Sbase is that the candidate set Usub
506
+ generated by it must contain the optimal instruction
507
+ u⋆ (condition S ). Fulfilling this condition requires
508
+ Sbase to be capable of quickly generating candidates
509
+ and placing sufficiently high probability on u⋆ so
510
+ that the instruction can be found by sampling a few
511
+ candidates. We refer to this capability as the search
512
+ capability of an agent.
513
+ The condition for LToM is that it must rank u⋆
514
+ first among the candidates (condition T ). Meeting
515
+ this condition demands having the capability of
516
+ mentally counterfactually simulating the behavior
517
+ of the listener in an environment, and evaluating
518
+ whether the communicated intention is actualized
519
+ in the simulation. We refer to this capability as the
520
+ ToM capability.
521
+ The search and ToM capabilities are orthogonal
522
+ and complementary. An agent with flawless ToM
523
+ capability can evaluate the goodness of instructions
524
+ given to it, but may not be able to efficiently gener-
525
+ ate good instructions by itself. In contrast, an agent
526
+ with effective search capability can quickly bring
527
+ to attention highly relevant utterances but may not
528
+ always select the best one for its communication
529
+ purposes if it has a misleading ToM model.
530
+ 4.3
531
+ Assessing the Cognitive Capabilities of an
532
+ Instruction Generation Agent
533
+ We consider a speaker agent r that learns a model
534
+ Sr(u | e) and communicates a trajectory e⋆ by
535
+ running an inference algorithm to compute an in-
536
+ struction ˆuinfer ≈ arg maxu∈U Sr(u | e⋆). Gen-
537
+ erative LSTM- or Transformer-based models that
538
+ implement greedy or beam-search decoding are
539
+ examples of such an agent.
540
+ We notice that, like humans, r also possesses
541
+ search and ToM capabilities. On one hand, it can
542
+ generate candidate instructions like a base speaker
543
+ by sampling from Sr or executing an inference al-
544
+ gorithm. On the other hand, for a fixed e⋆, it can
545
+ use Sr(u | e⋆) as a ToM model to rank instruc-
546
+ tions. Improving these capabilities is crucial for r
547
+ to better solve PIGEN. In fact, suppose Sr satis-
548
+ fies conditions T and the following candidate set
549
+ generated by Sr
550
+ Ur
551
+ sub ≜ {ˆuinfer} ∪ {ui ∼ Sr | 1 ≤ i ≤ N}
552
+ (7)
553
+ fulfills condition
554
+ S . Then instead of running the
555
+
556
+ do1o
557
+ 00o1oQ
558
+ d456896934c56680.266
559
+ efb1d36fd87d4287a115od9553e7o0df
560
+ 2inference algorithm, it can generate instructions as
561
+ a bounded pragmatic agent as follows
562
+ ˆu ≜ arg max
563
+ u∈Ur
564
+ sub
565
+ Sr(u | e⋆)
566
+ (8)
567
+ and optimizes the PIGEN objective.
568
+ To evaluate each capability of r, we measure
569
+ the performance gap between the agent and a sky-
570
+ line agent which is at human level in the evaluated
571
+ capability but is equally good as r at the other ca-
572
+ pability. Specifically, we define roracle-search to be
573
+ an agent that employs Sr as the ToM model but
574
+ is given a “gold” candidate set U⋆
575
+ cand that always
576
+ contains the ground-truth instruction u⋆. It outputs
577
+ an instruction as follows
578
+ ˆuoracle-search ≜ arg max
579
+ u∈U⋆
580
+ cand
581
+ Sr(u | e⋆)
582
+ (9)
583
+ This agent has similar ToM capability as r but
584
+ human-level search capability (in fact, its search
585
+ capability satisfies condition
586
+ S ). Next, we con-
587
+ struct roracle-ToM which generates candidates using
588
+ Sr but employs a real human to select the output
589
+ instruction
590
+ ˆuoracle-ToM ≜ arg max
591
+ u∈Ur
592
+ sub
593
+ Lh(e⋆ | u)
594
+ (10)
595
+ where ˆuinfer is the instruction generated by the in-
596
+ ference algorithm that r implements and Ur
597
+ sub is de-
598
+ fined as in Eq 7. The search capability of roracle-ToM
599
+ is as good as r but its ToM capability is that of a
600
+ human.
601
+ We define the prospective performance gain
602
+ (PPG) with respect to each capability as follows
603
+ PPGsearch(r) ≜ ρ(roracle-search) − ρ(r)
604
+ (11)
605
+ PPGToM(r) ≜ ρ(roracle-ToM) − ρ(r)
606
+ (12)
607
+ where ρ computes the performance metric of an
608
+ agent on evaluation data (Eq 2 of §3.2). The met-
609
+ ric computes the potential improvement if one of
610
+ the capability is enhanced. It implies which of the
611
+ two capabilities of r is currently more deficient and
612
+ thus informs future development direction for the
613
+ agent. For example, if PPGsearch(r) is large and
614
+ PPGToM(r) is small, it means that the evaluated
615
+ agent is scoring the candidate instructions highly
616
+ accurately but it is bad at finding high-score in-
617
+ structions. In this case, developers may want to
618
+ focus on devising a more effective inference al-
619
+ gorithm for the agent. On the other hand, if the
620
+ agent’s estimated scores are poorly calibrated, sig-
621
+ nified by PPGToM(r) being large, building a bet-
622
+ ter planning module that simulates the listener’s
623
+ behavior more accurately would yield significant
624
+ performance boost.
625
+ 5
626
+ Improving ToM Capability with
627
+ Ensemble Instruction-Following
628
+ Agents
629
+ We improve the ToM capability of an agent r by
630
+ turning it into a bounded pragmatic agent that uses
631
+ the original model Sr as the base speaker but is
632
+ equipped with a better ToM model than Sr. A com-
633
+ mon approach for building a ToM model is to learn
634
+ an instruction-following policy ˆπ(a | u, ¯e) using
635
+ the same dataset used for learning Sr (Andreas and
636
+ Klein, 2016; Fried et al., 2017, 2018).
637
+ We argue that this approach has a potential draw-
638
+ back. A ToM model learned in this way is only
639
+ exposed to human-generated input instructions. At
640
+ deployment time, it would likely experience a co-
641
+ variate shift because as a ToM model, the model
642
+ is then asked to score instructions generated by
643
+ a speaker model, not by humans. These instruc-
644
+ tions may be incorrect, ungrammatical, or may sim-
645
+ ply have a different style than human-generated
646
+ instructions. This covariate shift would hamper the
647
+ model’s judgement. Our preliminary experiments
648
+ (Appendix § A.5) confirms that using a listener
649
+ trained on only human-generated inputs as the ToM
650
+ model hurts rather than improves the performance
651
+ of various speakers.
652
+ We show that this problem can be alleviated by
653
+ employing ToM models that have calibrated uncer-
654
+ tainty on unseen instructions. We obtain calibrated
655
+ models through ensembling (Lakshminarayanan
656
+ et al., 2017). Specifically, we randomly draw K
657
+ 90%-samples of the training dataset. We use each
658
+ sample to train an instruction-following policy
659
+ ˆπ(k)(a | u, ¯e); the policies are also initialized with
660
+ different random seeds.
661
+ When the agent has access to a simulation of
662
+ the environment, it can leverage the simulation to
663
+ construct better ToM models. Note that the proba-
664
+ bility that a ToM model LToM assigns to an instruc-
665
+ tion can be seen as an expectation of a 0-1 metric:
666
+ LToM(e⋆ | u) = Ee∼LToM(·|u) [1{e = e⋆}], which
667
+ does not award partial credit if e partially overlaps
668
+ with e⋆. We make two changes: (i) replace the 0-1
669
+ metric with a soft metric Ψ(e, e⋆) that can measure
670
+ partial similarity between trajectories and (ii) ap-
671
+
672
+ proximate the expectation by executing instruction-
673
+ following policies ˆπ(k) in the environment to sam-
674
+ ple trajectories. Our final ToM-augmented agent
675
+ selects its instruction as follows
676
+ ˆuaugment-ToM ≜ arg max
677
+ u∈Ur
678
+ sub
679
+ LToM(u, e⋆)
680
+ (13)
681
+ LToM(u, e⋆) ≜
682
+ 1
683
+ KM
684
+ K
685
+
686
+ k=1
687
+ M
688
+
689
+ j=1
690
+ Ψ(ej(ˆπ(k), u), e⋆)
691
+ Ur
692
+ sub ≜ {ˆuinfer} ∪ {ui ∼ Sr | 1 ≤ i ≤ N}
693
+ where e(π, u) denotes a trajectory obtained by con-
694
+ tinuously sampling actions from a policy π condi-
695
+ tioned on an instruction u.
696
+ 6
697
+ Experimental Setup
698
+ 6.1
699
+ Environment and Dataset
700
+ We setup an instruction generation problem in 3D
701
+ environments using the Matterport3D simulator
702
+ (Anderson et al., 2018b). The simulator photo-
703
+ realistically emulates the visual perception of a
704
+ person walking in an indoor environment. Travel-
705
+ ing in an environment is simulated as traversing in
706
+ a graph where each node corresponds to a location.
707
+ At any location, an agent is provided with RGB
708
+ images capturing the 360-degree panoramic view
709
+ when looking from that location.
710
+ We train our speaker and listener models
711
+ using the Room-to-Room (R2R) dataset which
712
+ accompanies the simulator. The R2R dataset was
713
+ originally created for training instruction-following
714
+ agents. Each data point was collected by asking
715
+ a crowd-worker to write a verbal description of a
716
+ path in an environment. In the end, each path was
717
+ annotated with three instructions. Each instruction
718
+ contains 29 words on average. The dataset is split
719
+ into a training set (61 environments, 4,675 paths),
720
+ a seen validation set (340 paths) whose paths
721
+ are sampled in the training environments, and an
722
+ unseen validation set (11 environments unseen
723
+ during training, 783 paths).
724
+ We train the models using the training set and
725
+ validate them on the unseen validation set for
726
+ model selection. The final performance metrics
727
+ are computed on the seen validation set.
728
+ 6.2
729
+ Speaker Models
730
+ We evaluate three speaker model architectures. The
731
+ first is a GPT-2 model pre-trained on text (Radford
732
+ et al., 2019) and fine-tuned on the R2R training
733
+ set. The other two models are encoder-decoders:
734
+ one implements an LSTM architecture similar to
735
+ (Shen et al., 2022), and the other is based on a
736
+ Transformer architecture (Vaswani et al., 2017).
737
+ The parameters of these two models are randomly
738
+ initialized.
739
+ Training.
740
+ We train the speakers with a standard
741
+ maximum-likelihood objective using the AdamW
742
+ optimizer (Loshchilov and Hutter, 2019) with
743
+ a learning rate of 10−4.
744
+ More detailed model
745
+ implementation and hyperparameters are provided
746
+ in § A.1.
747
+ During training, we select the best
748
+ model based on the unseen-validation BLEU score
749
+ (Papineni et al., 2002) of the model-generated
750
+ instructions with the respect to the ground-truth
751
+ instructions.
752
+ 6.3
753
+ Human Evaluation
754
+ We evaluate each speaker model on 75 paths in
755
+ the unseen validation data split. In the end, we
756
+ have annotated 1,200 instructions generated by 16
757
+ different systems (humans, 3 speaker models, and
758
+ their ablated and augmented versions).
759
+ To evaluate a speaker model, we present its gen-
760
+ erated instructions to a human annotator and ask
761
+ them to follow the instructions to navigate in Mat-
762
+ terport3D environments. We adapt the PanGEA
763
+ tool2 to setup a web navigation interface and cre-
764
+ ate a task on Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk)
765
+ to recruit human evaluators. We pay the evaluator
766
+ $5.20 per task which takes about 25 minutes. For
767
+ each evaluation task, we ask the human evaluator
768
+ to follow six instruction-following sessions.
769
+ Quality Assurance.
770
+ One of the six sessions,
771
+ which appears in all tasks, is a quality-control test
772
+ featuring an easy-to-follow human-written instruc-
773
+ tion. We only approve an evaluator if they navigate
774
+ successfully to the goal destination in this test. Fol-
775
+ lowing Zhao et al. (2021), we instruct the judges
776
+ to not explore the environments unnecessarily and
777
+ not wander back and forth unless they are lost. We
778
+ record the trajectories created by the human and use
779
+ them to compute the performance metrics. More
780
+ details about the crowd-sourcing interface are given
781
+ in Appendix §A.4.
782
+ Performance Metrics.
783
+ The quality of a speaker
784
+ is determined by the similarity between the in-
785
+ tended trajectory and the actual trajectories that the
786
+ 2https://github.com/google-research/
787
+ pangea
788
+
789
+ speaker’s instructions induce the human evaluators
790
+ to generate. We compute these similarity metrics:
791
+ • Success rate (SR) averages binary indicators
792
+ of whether the final location of a human-
793
+ generated trajectory is within 3 meters of the
794
+ final location of the intended trajectory;
795
+ • SPL (Anderson et al., 2018a) weights the suc-
796
+ cess indicator with the ratio between the in-
797
+ tended traveling distance and the actual one;
798
+ • NDTW and SDTW are metrics based on dy-
799
+ namic time-warping alignment (Magalhaes
800
+ et al., 2019), capturing the similarity between
801
+ two point sequences. NDTW computes only
802
+ a sequence similarity score while SDTW
803
+ weights the score with the success indicator.
804
+ 7
805
+ Experiments
806
+ We investigate the following questions:
807
+ (a) How well do the speakers perform on our
808
+ problem? We find that, while implementing
809
+ advanced model architectures, these speakers
810
+ perform poorly compared to human speakers.
811
+ (b) What causes their performance deficiency?
812
+ Using our evaluation scheme, we identify that
813
+ the speakers possess decent search capability
814
+ but inadequate ToM capability.
815
+ (c) Can we improve the speakers by equip-
816
+ ping them with better ToM models?
817
+ We
818
+ train ensembles of state-of-the-art instruction-
819
+ following agents to serve as the ToM models
820
+ for the speakers, and obtain significant im-
821
+ provements.
822
+ (d) What are the challenges in bridging the
823
+ performance gap with human speakers?
824
+ We show that state-of-the-art instruction-
825
+ following agents are not optimally trained to
826
+ serve as ToM models because they are mostly
827
+ trained to predict how humans follow human-
828
+ generated instructions, but as ToM models,
829
+ they are required to accurately predict how
830
+ humans follow model-generated instructions.
831
+ How well do the speakers perform on our prob-
832
+ lem?
833
+ Figure 3 shows the performance of the three
834
+ speaker models on variety of metrics. We also eval-
835
+ uate the human-written instructions provided by
836
+ the R2R dataset. Overall, there is a wide mar-
837
+ gin between the models and the humans.
838
+ The
839
+ best model speaker (EncDec-Transformer) lags be-
840
+ hind the humans by 21.6 NDTW points. We find
841
+ that the encoder-decoder architecture with cross-
842
+ attention of EncDec-Transformer outperforms the
843
+ 0
844
+ 10
845
+ 20
846
+ 30
847
+ 40
848
+ 50
849
+ 60
850
+ 70
851
+ 80
852
+ NDTW
853
+ SR
854
+ SPL
855
+ SDTW
856
+ Metric Value
857
+ Fine-tuned GPT-2
858
+ EncDec-LSTM
859
+ EncDec-Transformer
860
+ Humans
861
+ Figure 3: Performance of different speakers on held-
862
+ out evaluation data. There is a considerable gap be-
863
+ tween model and humans speakers.
864
+ +6.7
865
+ +1.2
866
+ +3.9
867
+ +35.2
868
+ +30.9
869
+ +25.8
870
+ 0
871
+ 10
872
+ 20
873
+ 30
874
+ 40
875
+ 50
876
+ 60
877
+ 70
878
+ 80
879
+ 90
880
+ Fine-tuned GPT-2
881
+ EncDec-LSTM
882
+ EncDec-Transformer
883
+ NDTW
884
+ Original
885
+ with Oracle Search
886
+ with Oracle ToM
887
+ Figure 4:
888
+ Performance of the speakers and their
889
+ human-augmented versions. Possessing human-level
890
+ ToM capability improves performance of the speakers,
891
+ showing that their original ToM capability is highly
892
+ deficient compared to that of humans.
893
+ decoder-only self-attention architecture of GPT-
894
+ 2 (+11.7 NDTW), indicating that fusing the vi-
895
+ sion and language features too early in an archi-
896
+ tecture may be detrimental. On the other hand,
897
+ EncDec-Transformer leads over EncDec-LSTM by
898
+ 4.1 points, suggesting that the Transformer architec-
899
+ ture is more effective than LSTM in this problem.
900
+ What causes the speakers’ performance defi-
901
+ ciency?
902
+ Next, we investigate whether the lack of
903
+ search or ToM capability is responsible for the per-
904
+ formance deficiency of the speakers. Following our
905
+ evaluation scheme, we compute the prospective per-
906
+ formance gains when one of the capabilities were
907
+ made optimal. The results presented in Figure 4
908
+ show that it is an under-performed ToM capability
909
+ that primarily causes the models to perform poorly.
910
+ While equipping the models with optimal search
911
+ capability only improves their performance by 30%
912
+ on average, granting them optimal ToM capability
913
+ nearly doubles their performance metrics. In fact,
914
+ the search capability of the models is already as
915
+ good as that of the humans we employ, because the
916
+ models with optimal ToM capability achieve even
917
+
918
+ Base speaker Sbase
919
+ ToM listener LToM
920
+ Fine-tuned GPT-2
921
+ EncDec-LSTM
922
+ EncDec-Transformer
923
+ None
924
+ 37.7
925
+ (▲ 0.0)
926
+ 45.3
927
+ (▲ 0.0)
928
+ 49.4
929
+ (▲ 0.0)
930
+ Single VLN-BERT (Majumdar et al., 2020)
931
+ 38.9
932
+ (▲ 1.2)
933
+ 39.8
934
+ (▼ 5.5)
935
+ 46.2 (▼ 3.2)
936
+ Ensemble of 10 EnvDrop-CLIP (Shen et al., 2022)
937
+ 37.8
938
+ (▲ 0.1)
939
+ 53.1† (▲ 7.8)
940
+ 57.3† (▲ 7.9)
941
+ Ensemble of 10 VLN
942
+
943
+ BERT (Hong et al., 2021)
944
+ 43.4
945
+ (▲ 5.7)
946
+ 56.4‡ (▲ 11.1)
947
+ 54.2
948
+ (▲ 4.8)
949
+ Humans (skyline)
950
+ 72.9‡ (▲ 35.2)
951
+ 76.2‡ (▲ 30.9)
952
+ 75.2‡ (▲ 25.8)
953
+ Table 1: Performance of the speakers when equipped with different ToM models. Employing ensemble instruction-
954
+ following agents significantly improves their performance.
955
+ ‡ and † indicate results that are significantly higher
956
+ than those of the corresponding “None” baseline (row 1) with p < 0.05 and p < 0.1, respectively (according to a
957
+ two-related-sample t-test).
958
+ Listener
959
+ Instructions generated by
960
+ VLN-BERT
961
+ EnvDrop-CLIP
962
+ VLN
963
+
964
+ BERT
965
+ Humans (R2R dataset)
966
+ 65.4 (▼ 0.0)
967
+ 47.2 (▼ 0.0)
968
+ 65.0 (▼ 0.0)
969
+ Fine-tuned GPT-2
970
+ 43.1‡ (▼ 22.3)
971
+ 31.6‡ (▼ 15.6)
972
+ 39.9‡ (▼ 25.1)
973
+ EncDec-LSTM
974
+ 50.0‡ (▼ 15.4)
975
+ 43.7 (▼ 3.5)
976
+ 49.3‡ (▼ 15.7)
977
+ EncDec-Transformer
978
+ 52.1‡ (▼ 13.3)
979
+ 41.5 (▼ 5.5)
980
+ 51.9‡ (▼ 13.1)
981
+ Table 2: Agreement of human and model listeners on instructions generated by different speakers. The level
982
+ of agreement decreases substantially when shifting from human-generated to model-generated instructions.
983
+
984
+ indicate results that are significantly lower than the human skyline (row 1) with p < 0.05 (according to a
985
+ two-related-sample t-test).
986
+ slightly higher SDTW score than the human speak-
987
+ ers (e.g., 75.2 of EncDec-Transformer compared
988
+ to 71.0 of humans), though the differences are not
989
+ statistically significant.
990
+ Can we improve the speakers by equipping
991
+ them with better ToM models?
992
+ Following the
993
+ procedure described in Section §5, we train var-
994
+ ious state-of-the-art instruction-following agents
995
+ to serve as ToM listener models for the speakers.
996
+ These listeners are trained using maximum log-
997
+ likelihood on the same data as the speakers. Perfor-
998
+ mances of different combinations of speakers and
999
+ listeners are given in Table 1. We attain the largest
1000
+ improvement of 7.9 NDTW points over the best
1001
+ base speaker (EncDec-Transformer) by augment-
1002
+ ing this speaker with an ensemble of 10 EnvDrop-
1003
+ CLIP listeners as the ToM model. We observe that
1004
+ ensemble models consistently outperform single
1005
+ models. More results about the detrimental effects
1006
+ of using single listeners on the speakers is given in
1007
+ Appendix §A.5. Despite the promising improve-
1008
+ ments, there remains a large gap of 17.9 NDTW
1009
+ points between our best speaker and the human
1010
+ speakers.
1011
+ What are the challenges in bridging the perfor-
1012
+ mance gap with human speakers?
1013
+ In the previ-
1014
+ ous set of experiments, a notable pattern emerges:
1015
+ the performance superiority of a listener on the
1016
+ R2R instruction-following problem, where it is
1017
+ asked to follow human-generated instruction, does
1018
+ not translate into a superiority in serving as a ToM
1019
+ model, where it is asked to rank model-generated
1020
+ instructions. To further illustrate this phenomenon,
1021
+ we measure the agreement between human listen-
1022
+ ers and model listeners on instructions generated
1023
+ by different speakers. We define the agreement
1024
+ score between a human Lh and a model ˆL as
1025
+ Agreement(Lh, ˆL)
1026
+ (14)
1027
+ = Averageu∈Deval (NDTW(eh(u), ˆe(u))) (15)
1028
+ where eh(u) and ˆe(u) are the trajectories gener-
1029
+ ated by Lh and ˆL given u, respectively, and Deval
1030
+ denotes the R2R seen validation set.
1031
+ As seen from Table 2, the listener agents agree
1032
+ more with the humans on human-generated instruc-
1033
+ tions than on model-generated ones. These re-
1034
+ sults can be explained through the lens of training-
1035
+ deployment covariate shift: during training, the
1036
+ model listeners are only trained to agree with hu-
1037
+ man listeners on human-generated instructions and
1038
+
1039
+ thus does not know how to behave properly on
1040
+ other types of instructions.
1041
+ 8
1042
+ Conclusion
1043
+ This work introduces a framework for analyzing of
1044
+ the cognitive capabilities of instruction generation
1045
+ agents. Our analysis highlights the necessity of
1046
+ constructing better ToM models for these agents.
1047
+ We argue that learning ToM models is faced with
1048
+ challenges that are distinct from those of learning
1049
+ instruction-following agents. We hope that our find-
1050
+ ings will motivate the community to create novel
1051
+ datasets, training methods, and evaluation proce-
1052
+ dures for tackling this problem.
1053
+ References
1054
+ Anne H Anderson, Miles Bader, Ellen Gurman Bard,
1055
+ Elizabeth Boyle, Gwyneth Doherty, Simon Garrod,
1056
+ Stephen Isard, Jacqueline Kowtko, Jan McAllister,
1057
+ Jim Miller, et al. 1991. The hcrc map task corpus.
1058
+ Language and speech, 34(4):351–366.
1059
+ Peter Anderson, Angel Chang, Devendra Singh Chap-
1060
+ lot, Alexey Dosovitskiy, Saurabh Gupta, Vladlen
1061
+ Koltun, Jana Kosecka, Jitendra Malik, Roozbeh Mot-
1062
+ taghi, Manolis Savva, et al. 2018a.
1063
+ On evalua-
1064
+ tion of embodied navigation agents. arXiv preprint
1065
+ arXiv:1807.06757.
1066
+ Peter Anderson, Qi Wu, Damien Teney, Jake Bruce,
1067
+ Mark Johnson, Niko Sünderhauf, Ian Reid, Stephen
1068
+ Gould, and Anton Van Den Hengel. 2018b. Vision-
1069
+ and-language navigation:
1070
+ Interpreting visually-
1071
+ grounded navigation instructions in real environ-
1072
+ ments.
1073
+ In Proceedings of the IEEE conference
1074
+ on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages
1075
+ 3674–3683.
1076
+ Jacob Andreas and Dan Klein. 2016. Reasoning about
1077
+ pragmatics with neural listeners and speakers. arXiv
1078
+ preprint arXiv:1604.00562.
1079
+ Emily M Bender and Alexander Koller. 2020. Climb-
1080
+ ing towards nlu: On meaning, form, and understand-
1081
+ ing in the age of data. In Proceedings of the 58th
1082
+ annual meeting of the association for computational
1083
+ linguistics, pages 5185–5198.
1084
+ Paul A Bloom and Ira Fischler. 1980.
1085
+ Completion
1086
+ norms for 329 sentence contexts. Memory & cog-
1087
+ nition, 8(6):631–642.
1088
+ Donna Byron, Alexander Koller, Kristina Striegnitz,
1089
+ Justine Cassell, Robert Dale, Johanna D Moore, and
1090
+ Jon Oberlander. 2010. Report on the first nlg chal-
1091
+ lenge on generating instructions in virtual environ-
1092
+ ments (give).
1093
+ Josep Call and Michael Tomasello. 2011.
1094
+ Does the
1095
+ chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later.
1096
+ Human Nature and Self Design, pages 83–96.
1097
+ Ivan Enrici, Bruno G Bara, and Mauro Adenzato. 2019.
1098
+ Theory of mind, pragmatics and the brain: Converg-
1099
+ ing evidence for the role of intention processing as
1100
+ a core feature ofhuman communication. Pragmatics
1101
+ & Cognition, 26(1):5–38.
1102
+ Meta Fundamental AI Research Diplomacy Team
1103
+ (FAIR)†, Anton Bakhtin, Noam Brown, Emily Di-
1104
+ nan, Gabriele Farina, Colin Flaherty, Daniel Fried,
1105
+ Andrew Goff, Jonathan Gray, Hengyuan Hu, et al.
1106
+ 2022. Human-level play in the game of diplomacy
1107
+ by combining language models with strategic rea-
1108
+ soning. Science, page eade9097.
1109
+ Michael C Frank and Noah D Goodman. 2012. Pre-
1110
+ dicting pragmatic reasoning in language games. Sci-
1111
+ ence, 336(6084):998–998.
1112
+ Daniel Fried, Jacob Andreas, and Dan Klein. 2017.
1113
+ Unified pragmatic models for generating and follow-
1114
+ ing instructions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.04987.
1115
+ Daniel Fried, Ronghang Hu, Volkan Cirik, Anna
1116
+ Rohrbach, Jacob Andreas, Louis-Philippe Morency,
1117
+ Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, Kate Saenko, Dan Klein,
1118
+ and Trevor Darrell. 2018.
1119
+ Speaker-follower mod-
1120
+ els for vision-and-language navigation. Advances in
1121
+ Neural Information Processing Systems, 31.
1122
+ MY Ganaie and Hafiz Mudasir. 2015. A study of so-
1123
+ cial intelligence & academic achievement of college
1124
+ students of district srinagar, j&k, india. Journal of
1125
+ American Science, 11(3):23–27.
1126
+ Robert Goeddel and Edwin Olson. 2012.
1127
+ Dart: A
1128
+ particle-based method for generating easy-to-follow
1129
+ directions. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Confer-
1130
+ ence on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 1213–
1131
+ 1219. IEEE.
1132
+ Jason M Gold, Richard F Murray, Patrick J Ben-
1133
+ nett, and Allison B Sekuler. 2000.
1134
+ Deriving be-
1135
+ havioural receptive fields for visually completed con-
1136
+ tours. Current Biology, 10(11):663–666.
1137
+ Noah D Goodman and Michael C Frank. 2016. Prag-
1138
+ matic language interpretation as probabilistic infer-
1139
+ ence. Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(11):818–829.
1140
+ Alison Gopnik and Janet W Astington. 1988.
1141
+ Chil-
1142
+ dren’s understanding of representational change and
1143
+ its relation to the understanding of false belief and
1144
+ the appearance-reality distinction.
1145
+ Child develop-
1146
+ ment, pages 26–37.
1147
+ Herbert P Grice. 1975.
1148
+ Logic and conversation.
1149
+ In
1150
+ Speech acts, pages 41–58. Brill.
1151
+ Janosch Haber, Tim Baumgärtner, Ece Takmaz, Lieke
1152
+ Gelderloos, Elia Bruni, and Raquel Fernández. 2019.
1153
+ The photobook dataset: Building common ground
1154
+ through visually-grounded dialogue. arXiv preprint
1155
+ arXiv:1906.01530.
1156
+
1157
+ Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian
1158
+ Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recog-
1159
+ nition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on
1160
+ computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770–
1161
+ 778.
1162
+ Mark K Ho, Michael Littman, James MacGlashan,
1163
+ Fiery Cushman, and Joseph L Austerweil. 2016.
1164
+ Showing versus doing: Teaching by demonstration.
1165
+ Advances in neural information processing systems,
1166
+ 29.
1167
+ Yicong Hong, Qi Wu, Yuankai Qi, Cristian Rodriguez-
1168
+ Opazo, and Stephen Gould. 2021. Vln bert: A recur-
1169
+ rent vision-and-language bert for navigation. In Pro-
1170
+ ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer
1171
+ Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1643–1653.
1172
+ Jennifer Hu, Sammy Floyd, Olessia Jouravlev, Evelina
1173
+ Fedorenko, and Edward Gibson. 2022.
1174
+ A fine-
1175
+ grained comparison of pragmatic language under-
1176
+ standing in humans and language models.
1177
+ arXiv
1178
+ preprint arXiv:2212.06801.
1179
+ Vihan
1180
+ Jain,
1181
+ Gabriel
1182
+ Magalhaes,
1183
+ Alexander
1184
+ Ku,
1185
+ Ashish Vaswani, Eugene Ie, and Jason Baldridge.
1186
+ 2019.
1187
+ Stay on the path:
1188
+ Instruction fidelity in
1189
+ vision-and-language navigation.
1190
+ arXiv preprint
1191
+ arXiv:1905.12255.
1192
+ Aishwarya Kamath, Peter Anderson, Su Wang, Jing Yu
1193
+ Koh, Alexander Ku, Austin Waters, Yinfei Yang, Ja-
1194
+ son Baldridge, and Zarana Parekh. 2022.
1195
+ A new
1196
+ path: Scaling vision-and-language navigation with
1197
+ synthetic instructions and imitation learning. arXiv
1198
+ preprint arXiv:2210.03112.
1199
+ Noriyuki Kojima, Alane Suhr, and Yoav Artzi. 2021.
1200
+ Continual learning for grounded instruction genera-
1201
+ tion by observing human following behavior. Trans-
1202
+ actions of the Association for Computational Lin-
1203
+ guistics, 9:1303–1319.
1204
+ Alexander Koller, Kristina Striegnitz, Andrew Gar-
1205
+ gett, Donna Byron, Justine Cassell, Robert Dale, Jo-
1206
+ hanna D Moore, and Jon Oberlander. 2010. Report
1207
+ on the second nlg challenge on generating instruc-
1208
+ tions in virtual environments (give-2). In Proceed-
1209
+ ings of the 6th international natural language gen-
1210
+ eration conference. The Association for Computer
1211
+ Linguistics.
1212
+ Alexander Ku, Peter Anderson, Roma Patel, Eugene
1213
+ Ie, and Jason Baldridge. 2020. Room-across-room:
1214
+ Multilingual vision-and-language navigation with
1215
+ dense spatiotemporal grounding.
1216
+ arXiv preprint
1217
+ arXiv:2010.07954.
1218
+ Royi Lachmy, Valentina Pyatkin, and Reut Tsarfaty.
1219
+ 2021. Draw me a flower: Grounding formal abstract
1220
+ structures stated in informal natural language. arXiv
1221
+ preprint arXiv:2106.14321.
1222
+ Balaji Lakshminarayanan,
1223
+ Alexander Pritzel,
1224
+ and
1225
+ Charles Blundell. 2017.
1226
+ Simple and scalable pre-
1227
+ dictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles.
1228
+ Advances in neural information processing systems,
1229
+ 30.
1230
+ Matthew Le, Y-Lan Boureau, and Maximilian Nickel.
1231
+ 2019. Revisiting the evaluation of theory of mind
1232
+ through question answering. In Proceedings of the
1233
+ 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natu-
1234
+ ral Language Processing and the 9th International
1235
+ Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing
1236
+ (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 5872–5877.
1237
+ Hector Levesque, Ernest Davis, and Leora Morgen-
1238
+ stern. 2012. The winograd schema challenge. In
1239
+ Thirteenth international conference on the princi-
1240
+ ples of knowledge representation and reasoning.
1241
+ Jessy Lin, Daniel Fried, Dan Klein, and Anca Dragan.
1242
+ 2022. Inferring rewards from language in context.
1243
+ arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.02515.
1244
+ Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. 2019.
1245
+ Decoupled
1246
+ weight decay regularization. In International Con-
1247
+ ference on Learning Representations.
1248
+ Gabriel Magalhaes, Vihan Jain, Alexander Ku, Eugene
1249
+ Ie, and Jason Baldridge. 2019. Effective and gen-
1250
+ eral evaluation for instruction conditioned naviga-
1251
+ tion using dynamic time warping.
1252
+ arXiv preprint
1253
+ arXiv:1907.05446.
1254
+ Arjun Majumdar, Ayush Shrivastava, Stefan Lee, Peter
1255
+ Anderson, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra. 2020. Im-
1256
+ proving vision-and-language navigation with image-
1257
+ text pairs from the web. In European Conference on
1258
+ Computer Vision, pages 259–274. Springer.
1259
+ Pascal Mamassian, Michael Landy, and Laurence T
1260
+ Maloney. 2002. Bayesian modelling of visual per-
1261
+ ception. Probabilistic models of the brain, 13:36.
1262
+ Aida Nematzadeh, Kaylee Burns, Erin Grant, Alison
1263
+ Gopnik, and Tom Griffiths. 2018. Evaluating theory
1264
+ of mind in question answering. In Proceedings of
1265
+ the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Nat-
1266
+ ural Language Processing, pages 2392–2400, Brus-
1267
+ sels, Belgium. Association for Computational Lin-
1268
+ guistics.
1269
+ OpenAI. 2022. Chatgpt: Optimizing language models
1270
+ for dialogue.
1271
+ https://openai.com/blog/
1272
+ chatgpt.
1273
+ Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-
1274
+ Jing Zhu. 2002. Bleu: a method for automatic eval-
1275
+ uation of machine translation.
1276
+ In Proceedings of
1277
+ the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Com-
1278
+ putational Linguistics, pages 311–318, Philadelphia,
1279
+ Pennsylvania, USA. Association for Computational
1280
+ Linguistics.
1281
+ David Premack and Guy Woodruff. 1978.
1282
+ Does the
1283
+ chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and
1284
+ brain sciences, 1(4):515–526.
1285
+
1286
+ Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya
1287
+ Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish
1288
+ Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark,
1289
+ et al. 2021.
1290
+ Learning transferable visual models
1291
+ from natural language supervision. In International
1292
+ Conference on Machine Learning, pages 8748–8763.
1293
+ PMLR.
1294
+ Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan,
1295
+ Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, et al. 2019.
1296
+ Lan-
1297
+ guage models are unsupervised multitask learners.
1298
+ OpenAI blog, 1(8):9.
1299
+ Paula Rubio-Fernandez. 2021. Pragmatic markers: the
1300
+ missing link between language and theory of mind.
1301
+ Synthese, 199(1):1125–1158.
1302
+ Adam N Sanborn and Nick Chater. 2016.
1303
+ Bayesian
1304
+ brains without probabilities. Trends in cognitive sci-
1305
+ ences, 20(12):883–893.
1306
+ Adam N Sanborn, Thomas L Griffiths, and Daniel J
1307
+ Navarro. 2010. Rational approximations to rational
1308
+ models: alternative algorithms for category learning.
1309
+ Psychological review, 117(4):1144.
1310
+ Maarten Sap, Ronan LeBras, Daniel Fried, and Yejin
1311
+ Choi. 2022. Neural theory-of-mind? on the limits
1312
+ of social intelligence in large lms. arXiv preprint
1313
+ arXiv:2210.13312.
1314
+ Maarten Sap, Hannah Rashkin, Derek Chen, Ronan
1315
+ Le Bras, and Yejin Choi. 2019. Social IQa: Com-
1316
+ monsense reasoning about social interactions.
1317
+ In
1318
+ Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical
1319
+ Methods in Natural Language Processing and the
1320
+ 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Lan-
1321
+ guage Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 4463–
1322
+ 4473, Hong Kong, China. Association for Computa-
1323
+ tional Linguistics.
1324
+ Thom Scott-Phillips. 2014. Speaking our minds: Why
1325
+ human communication is different, and how lan-
1326
+ guage evolved to make it special. Bloomsbury Pub-
1327
+ lishing.
1328
+ Patrick Shafto, Noah D Goodman, and Thomas L Grif-
1329
+ fiths. 2014. A rational account of pedagogical rea-
1330
+ soning: Teaching by, and learning from, examples.
1331
+ Cognitive psychology, 71:55–89.
1332
+ Sheng Shen, Liunian Harold Li, Hao Tan, Mohit
1333
+ Bansal, Anna Rohrbach, Kai-Wei Chang, Zhewei
1334
+ Yao, and Kurt Keutzer. 2022. How much can clip
1335
+ benefit vision-and-language tasks? In Proceedings
1336
+ of the International Conference on Learning Repre-
1337
+ sentations.
1338
+ Herbert A Simon. 1957. Models of man; social and
1339
+ rational.
1340
+ Kristina Striegnitz, Alexandre AJ Denis, Andrew Gar-
1341
+ gett, Konstantina Garoufi, Alexander Koller, and
1342
+ Mariët Theune. 2011. Report on the second second
1343
+ challenge on generating instructions in virtual envi-
1344
+ ronments (give-2.5). In 13th European workshop on
1345
+ natural language generation.
1346
+ Theodore Sumers, Robert D Hawkins, Mark K Ho,
1347
+ Thomas L Griffiths, and Dylan Hadfield-Menell.
1348
+ 2022. How to talk so ai will learn: Instructions, de-
1349
+ scriptions, and autonomy.
1350
+ In Advances in Neural
1351
+ Information Processing Systems.
1352
+ Alon Talmor, Jonathan Herzig, Nicholas Lourie, and
1353
+ Jonathan Berant. 2018. Commonsenseqa: A ques-
1354
+ tion answering challenge targeting commonsense
1355
+ knowledge. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.00937.
1356
+ Hao Tan, Licheng Yu, and Mohit Bansal. 2019. Learn-
1357
+ ing to navigate unseen environments: Back trans-
1358
+ lation with environmental dropout. arXiv preprint
1359
+ arXiv:1904.04195.
1360
+ Romal Thoppilan, Daniel De Freitas, Jamie Hall,
1361
+ Noam Shazeer, Apoorv Kulshreshtha, Heng-Tze
1362
+ Cheng, Alicia Jin, Taylor Bos, Leslie Baker, Yu Du,
1363
+ et al. 2022. Lamda: Language models for dialog
1364
+ applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08239.
1365
+ Michael Tomasello. 2019. Becoming human. In Be-
1366
+ coming Human. Harvard University Press.
1367
+ Anna Trosborg. 2010.
1368
+ Pragmatics across languages
1369
+ and cultures, volume 7. De Gruyter Mouton.
1370
+ Takuma Udagawa and Akiko Aizawa. 2019.
1371
+ A nat-
1372
+ ural language corpus of common grounding under
1373
+ continuous and partially-observable context. In Pro-
1374
+ ceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intel-
1375
+ ligence, volume 33, pages 7120–7127.
1376
+ Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob
1377
+ Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz
1378
+ Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all
1379
+ you need. Advances in neural information process-
1380
+ ing systems, 30.
1381
+ Edward Vul, Noah Goodman, Thomas L Griffiths, and
1382
+ Joshua B Tenenbaum. 2014. One and done? optimal
1383
+ decisions from very few samples. Cognitive science,
1384
+ 38(4):599–637.
1385
+ Hanqing Wang,
1386
+ Wei Liang,
1387
+ Jianbing Shen,
1388
+ Luc
1389
+ Van Gool, and Wenguan Wang. 2022. Counterfac-
1390
+ tual cycle-consistent learning for instruction follow-
1391
+ ing and generation in vision-language navigation. In
1392
+ Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com-
1393
+ puter Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 15471–
1394
+ 15481.
1395
+ Pei Wang, Junqi Wang, Pushpi Paranamana, and
1396
+ Patrick Shafto. 2020. A mathematical theory of co-
1397
+ operative communication. Advances in Neural In-
1398
+ formation Processing Systems, 33:17582–17593.
1399
+ Su Wang, Ceslee Montgomery, Jordi Orbay, Vighnesh
1400
+ Birodkar, Aleksandra Faust, Izzeddin Gur, Natasha
1401
+ Jaques, Austin Waters, Jason Baldridge, and Pe-
1402
+ ter Anderson. 2021.
1403
+ Less is more:
1404
+ Generating
1405
+ grounded navigation instructions from landmarks.
1406
+ arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.12872.
1407
+
1408
+ Rowan Zellers, Yonatan Bisk, Ali Farhadi, and Yejin
1409
+ Choi. 2019.
1410
+ From recognition to cognition: Vi-
1411
+ sual commonsense reasoning. In Proceedings of the
1412
+ IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pat-
1413
+ tern recognition, pages 6720–6731.
1414
+ Ming Zhao, Peter Anderson, Vihan Jain, Su Wang,
1415
+ Alexander
1416
+ Ku,
1417
+ Jason
1418
+ Baldridge,
1419
+ and
1420
+ Eugene
1421
+ Ie. 2021.
1422
+ On the evaluation of vision-and-
1423
+ language navigation instructions.
1424
+ arXiv preprint
1425
+ arXiv:2101.10504.
1426
+ Hyperparam
1427
+ GPT-2
1428
+ Transformer
1429
+ Learning rate
1430
+ 10−4
1431
+ 10−4
1432
+ Batch size
1433
+ 4
1434
+ 32
1435
+ Optimizer
1436
+ AdamW
1437
+ AdamW
1438
+ Num. of training iterations
1439
+ 2 × 105
1440
+ 16 × 104
1441
+ Max. action steps
1442
+ 15
1443
+ 35
1444
+ Max. instruction length
1445
+ 100
1446
+ 80
1447
+ Image feature size
1448
+ 2048
1449
+ 512
1450
+ Orientation feature size
1451
+ 128
1452
+ 128
1453
+ Embedding dropout
1454
+ 0.1
1455
+ 0.3
1456
+ Hidden size
1457
+ 768
1458
+ 512
1459
+ Num. of hidden layers
1460
+ 1
1461
+ 1
1462
+ Hidden-layer dropout rate
1463
+ 0.0
1464
+ 0.6
1465
+ Num. of encoder layers
1466
+ -
1467
+ 2
1468
+ Num. of decoder layers
1469
+ 12
1470
+ 2
1471
+ Transformer dropout rate
1472
+ 0.1
1473
+ 0.3
1474
+ Beam size
1475
+ 5
1476
+ 1
1477
+ Table 3:
1478
+ Hyperparameters for training the GPT-2
1479
+ EncDec-Transformer speakers.
1480
+ A
1481
+ Appendices
1482
+ A.1
1483
+ Implementation of Speaker Models
1484
+ The speaker models take a sequence of visual
1485
+ observations and actions from the trajectory
1486
+ e⋆ as input and output a text instruction u.
1487
+ The model is trained to estimate conditional
1488
+ probability Sθ(u|e⋆).
1489
+ The model and training
1490
+ hyperparameters are listed in Table Table 3.
1491
+ Input.
1492
+ The input trajectory e⋆ is a sequence of
1493
+ panoramic views and actions. Each panoramic
1494
+ view at time step t is represented by 36 vectors
1495
+ {ot,i}36
1496
+ i=1, each of which is a visual feature vec-
1497
+ tor extracted from a pre-trained vision model con-
1498
+ catenated with orientation features describing the
1499
+ agent’s current gaze direction. The image features
1500
+ of the GPT-2 model are extracted from a ResNet-
1501
+ 152 model (He et al., 2016), whereas those of the
1502
+ encoder-decoder models are from a CLIP model
1503
+ (Radford et al., 2021). Each ground truth action
1504
+ a⋆
1505
+ t , which moves the agent to an adjacent location,
1506
+ is represented by image features from the gaze
1507
+ direction of the agent when looking towards that
1508
+ adjacent location, and orientation features captur-
1509
+ ing the direction of the adjacent location relative to
1510
+ the agent’s current gaze direction.
1511
+ Output.
1512
+ The output of a speaker model is a lan-
1513
+ guage instruction describing the input trajectory. At
1514
+ test time, the GPT-2 model employs beam search,
1515
+
1516
+ Performance Metrics
1517
+ Speaker
1518
+ SR ↑
1519
+ SPL ↑
1520
+ NDTW ↑
1521
+ SDTW ↑
1522
+ Path Len ↓
1523
+ Interpretability ↑
1524
+ Finetuned GPT-2
1525
+ 36.0
1526
+ 27.8
1527
+ 37.7
1528
+ 24.5
1529
+ 20.9
1530
+ 2.9
1531
+ EncDec-LSTM
1532
+ 49.3
1533
+ 37.6
1534
+ 45.3
1535
+ 33.8
1536
+ 17.4
1537
+ 3.3
1538
+ EncDec-Transformer
1539
+ 54.7
1540
+ 43.8
1541
+ 49.4
1542
+ 40.4
1543
+ 15.8
1544
+ 3.4
1545
+ Humans (R2R dataset)
1546
+ 76.0
1547
+ 67.6
1548
+ 71.0
1549
+ 64.8
1550
+ 14.2
1551
+ 3.6
1552
+ Table 4: Humans evaluation results on instructions generated by the speaker models. The similarity metrics are
1553
+ defined in § 6.3. Path Len measures the average length of the generated trajectories. Interpretability indicates
1554
+ how easy or difficult to follow the instructions according to human evaluators (without knowing the ground-truth
1555
+ trajectory).
1556
+ and the encoder-decoder models generate instruc-
1557
+ tions via greedy decoding (Shen et al., 2022).
1558
+ Training Objective.
1559
+ We train the speakers with
1560
+ maximum-likelihood objective:
1561
+ max
1562
+ θ
1563
+
1564
+ (u⋆,e⋆)∈Dtrain
1565
+ |u⋆|
1566
+
1567
+ t=1
1568
+ log Sθ(u⋆
1569
+ t | e⋆, u⋆
1570
+ <t) (16)
1571
+ where θ is the speaker model parameters, u⋆
1572
+ t is t-th
1573
+ word of the ground-truth instruction, and u⋆
1574
+ <t is the
1575
+ first t − 1 words of the instruction.
1576
+ A.2
1577
+ Fine-tuning GPT-2 Speaker Model
1578
+ To represent the trajectory features as a sequence
1579
+ of feature vectors to feed into the GPT-2 model, we
1580
+ first average the view features ¯ot for each time step:
1581
+ ¯ot = 1
1582
+ 36
1583
+ 36
1584
+
1585
+ i=1
1586
+ ot,i
1587
+ (17)
1588
+ We compute the input features e⋆
1589
+ t by concatenat-
1590
+ ing the panoramic view features and ground truth
1591
+ action features:
1592
+ e⋆
1593
+ t = [¯ot; a⋆
1594
+ t ]
1595
+ (18)
1596
+ The sequence of feature vectors e⋆ representing
1597
+ a trajectory is calculated as follows
1598
+ e⋆ = [tanh(e⋆
1599
+ 1W); · · · ; tanh(e⋆
1600
+ T W)]
1601
+ (19)
1602
+ where W is parameters of a linear layer.
1603
+ For the instruction u⋆, we perform an embed-
1604
+ ding look-up of its words. Then, we first prompt
1605
+ the model with e⋆ and then train it to generate u⋆
1606
+ as a suffix.
1607
+ A.3
1608
+ Training Encoder-Decoder Models
1609
+ Our EncDec-LSTM model follows the implementa-
1610
+ tion of the speaker in Shen et al. (2022). We imple-
1611
+ ment the EncDec-Transformer model by replacing
1612
+ the LSTM layers of the speaker model described in
1613
+ Tan et al. (2019) with Transformer layers (Vaswani
1614
+ et al., 2017).
1615
+ A.4
1616
+ Human Evaluation Interface
1617
+ Figure 5 shows the interface for our human evalu-
1618
+ ation. After a human evaluator finishes following
1619
+ an instruction, we recorded the path they generate
1620
+ and compute similarity metrics with respect to the
1621
+ ground-truth path. After the instruction-following
1622
+ sessions, we ask each evaluator to assess the inter-
1623
+ pretability of the instructions by asking them how
1624
+ easy (or difficult) it was for them to follow the in-
1625
+ struction. We provide four rating levels ranging
1626
+ from “1: I couldn’t follow any part of the instruc-
1627
+ tion” to “4: very easy, the instructions gave accu-
1628
+ rate and sufficient information for me to follow”.
1629
+ The answer of the evaluators is converted to a score
1630
+ between one and four.
1631
+ Table 4 shows the human evaluation results of
1632
+ the three speaker models we evaluated.
1633
+ A.5
1634
+ Single vs. Ensemble Listeners
1635
+ As a preliminary experiment, we compare the ef-
1636
+ fectiveness of a single and an ensemble of 10
1637
+ VLN
1638
+
1639
+ BERT agents when serving as the ToM
1640
+ model of a speaker. Results in Figure 6 show that
1641
+ the ensemble listener is significantly better than the
1642
+ single listener for two different speakers.
1643
+
1644
+ Figure 5: Human evaluation interface.
1645
+ SR
1646
+ SDTW
1647
+ NDTW
1648
+ SPL
1649
+ 0
1650
+ 15
1651
+ 30
1652
+ 45
1653
+ 60
1654
+ Single ToM Listener
1655
+ Ensemble ToM Listeners
1656
+ Fine-tuned GPT-2 Speaker
1657
+ SR
1658
+ SDTW
1659
+ NDTW
1660
+ SPL
1661
+ 0
1662
+ 11.5
1663
+ 23
1664
+ 34.5
1665
+ 46
1666
+ Single ToM Listener
1667
+ Ensemble ToM Listeners
1668
+ EncDec-LSTM Speaker
1669
+ Figure 6: Comparison of single and ensemble ToM lis-
1670
+ teners.
1671
+
1672
+ TiPS: Hold and drag mouse to rotate current view. Double-clickto move. The YELLOW
1673
+ square indicates the next location you would be moving towards.
1674
+ You will be evaluating instruction #1992. If this number does not match the number after
1675
+ '?id=' in the page's link, please refresh the page after clearing your browser's caches and
1676
+ cookies.
1677
+ Instructions to be followed:
1678
+ Walk out of the living room towards the stairs, between the couch and the
1679
+ sitting area. Go up the three small stairs and stop at the top of the stairs.
1680
+ How easy was it to follow the instructions?
1681
+ O Very easy, the instructions gave accurate and sufficient information for me to follow
1682
+ O I could follow most of the instructions, but some minor parts were wrong or missing
1683
+ O I couldn't follow at least half of the instructions
1684
+ O I couldn't follow any part of the instruction
1685
+ Mechanical Turk Woker ID: Enter Worker ID
1686
+ Please close the tab ONLY after you see a green line indicating that your answer has been
1687
+ received.
1688
+ Submit
PNE4T4oBgHgl3EQfkQ1N/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
PdAzT4oBgHgl3EQfIvsJ/content/tmp_files/2301.01065v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1771 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. 44846corr
2
+ ©ESO 2023
3
+ January 4, 2023
4
+ Sub-Jovian desert of exoplanets at its boundaries
5
+ Parameter dependence along the main sequence
6
+ Gy. M. Szabó1, 2, 3 , Sz. Kálmán2, 4, 5, 6, 7 , L. Borsato
7
+ 8, V. Heged˝us
8
+ 3, 5, Sz. Mészáros1, 3, and R. Szabó4, 7, 9, 10
9
+ 1 ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Gothard Astrophysical Observatory, Szombathely, Szent Imre h. u. 112., H-9700, Hungary
10
+ 2 MTA-ELTE Exoplanet Research Group, Szombathely, Szent Imre h. u. 112., H-9700, Hungary
11
+ 3 MTA-ELTE Lendület "Momentum" Milky Way Research Group, Hungary
12
+ 4 Konkoly Observatory, Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, ELKH, Budapest, Konkoly-Thege Miklós út 15–17.,
13
+ H-1121, Hungary
14
+ 5 ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Doctoral School of Physics, Budapest, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/A, H-1117, Hungary
15
+ 6 Graduate School of Physics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Dóm tér 9., H-6720, Hungary
16
+ 7 CSFK, MTA Centre of Excellence, Budapest, Konkoly Thege Miklós út 15-17., H-1121, Hungary
17
+ e-mail: [email protected]
18
+ 8 INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 5, I-35122, Padova, Italy
19
+ 9 Eötvös Loránd University, Institute of Physics, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/A, H-1171 Budapest, Hungary
20
+ 10 MTA CSFK Lendület Near-Field Cosmology Research Group
21
+ Recieved ....; accepted ....
22
+ ABSTRACT
23
+ Context. The lack of sub-Jovian planets on orbits of Porb < 3 days is a puzzling aspect of galaxy formation with regard to the
24
+ distribution of exoplanets whose origins are currently unresolved.
25
+ Aims. The possible explanations behind the formation of the sub-Jovian or Neptunian desert include several scenarios that can lead to
26
+ different shapes for the boundary, predicting various dependencies between the position of the boundary and the stellar parameters.
27
+ Methods. We explored the exoplanet distribution in various 2D and 3D projections, revealing the stellar-dependent substructures in
28
+ the Porb–MP and the Porb–RP parameter plane.
29
+ Results. We demonstrate that the upper boundary includes a range of planets, namely, inflated hot Jupiters and normal hot Jupiters,
30
+ in the two parameter planes, respectively. We confirm the dependence of the boundary on several stellar parameters and, based on a
31
+ fuzzy clustering analysis, we provide quantitative formulae for the dependencies in groups of smaller and larger planets. The overall
32
+ period-radius distribution shows chemical substructures as well, with the boundary being dependent on volatiles and alpha-elements,
33
+ alongside marginal (to none) dependence found for refractory elements.
34
+ Conclusions. These findings confirm multiple plausible causes for the formation of the desert, particularly preferring those scenarios
35
+ related to the irradiation-driven loss of the atmospheres of moderately massive planets as the predominant process in shaping planetary
36
+ distributions.
37
+ Key words. Methods: statistical – Planets and satellites: formation – Astronomical databases: miscellaneous
38
+ 1. Introduction
39
+ The observed absence of short-period planets (≲ 3 d) below the
40
+ hot Jupiter clump and above the hot super-Earths is known as the
41
+ “sub-Jovian desert” (Szabó & Kiss 2011; Benítez-Llambay et al.
42
+ 2011; Sanchis-Ojeda et al. 2014; Colón et al. 2015; Matsakos &
43
+ Königl 2016; Eigmüller et al. 2017; Owen & Lai 2018; Szabó
44
+ & Kálmán 2019) and “Neptunian desert” (Mazeh et al. 2016;
45
+ Demangeon et al. 2018; Ionov et al. 2018; Mori et al. 2022). In
46
+ recent years, several planets have been observed in these desert
47
+ regions (Demangeon et al. 2018; Dragomir et al. 2020; Jenkins
48
+ et al. 2020; Armstrong et al. 2020; Murgas et al. 2021; Mori
49
+ et al. 2022), with some deserts possibly undergoing a conversion
50
+ into a “savanna.” In this paper, we describe the desert-savanna
51
+ boundaries in the parameter space.
52
+ There is a known planet population both above and below
53
+ its boundaries, therefore, the sub-Jovian or Neptunian desert or
54
+ savanna itself is a puzzling structure of planetary distribution.
55
+ The location of the desert is a meeting point for high-energy
56
+ physics and atmospheric non-local thermodynamic equilibrium
57
+ (NLTE) processes (representing the stellar activity and irradia-
58
+ tion), planetary thermodynamics, and magneto-hydrodynamical
59
+ interactions between the planet and the star, end-points of plane-
60
+ tary migration, accretion processes in general, and planet forma-
61
+ tion and evolution in extreme environments as well. Therefore,
62
+ a test for planet formation theories is to check how they can ex-
63
+ plain the presence of the desert and its boundaries.
64
+ In Fig.1, we summarize the possible paths of how a young
65
+ planet, once formed, can leave the desert. The indicative direc-
66
+ tion of “leaving the desert” is denoted by numbers in the figure.
67
+ The processes suggested for the different scenarios thus far in-
68
+ clude: 1) the hyperinflation of low-mass gas giants at the bound-
69
+ ary (Mordasini et al. 2015); 2) planet-growth-based processes,
70
+ namely, it is has been well established that hot Jupiters have
71
+ higher-than-expected (i.e., inflated) radii (Thorngren & Fortney
72
+ 2018), which can be attributed to irradiation from the host (e.g.,
73
+ Sarkis et al. 2021). As the desert is observed in both the RP–P
74
+ and MP – P planes (and at sub-Jovian planet sizes), these pro-
75
+ cesses would necessarily have to include accretion as well as
76
+ Article number, page 1 of 11
77
+ arXiv:2301.01065v1 [astro-ph.EP] 3 Jan 2023
78
+
79
+ IDIDIDIDIDA&A proofs: manuscript no. 44846corr
80
+ 1
81
+ 3
82
+ 4
83
+ 2
84
+ 5
85
+ 6
86
+ -1
87
+ 0
88
+ 1
89
+ 2
90
+ 3
91
+ -1.2
92
+ -0.8
93
+ -0.4
94
+ 0.0
95
+ 0.4
96
+ log Rp/RJ
97
+ log P [d]
98
+ Fig. 1. Sketch of possible paths for already formed planets leaving the
99
+ sub-Jovian desert (red arrows) and planets not allowed to reach the
100
+ desert (blue arrows) overplotted to the distribution of known exoplan-
101
+ ets. Theories and references behind the scenarios are summarized in the
102
+ text.
103
+ inflation. The theoretical calculations done so far (Emsenhuber
104
+ et al. 2021a,b) were insufficient to explore this scenario in de-
105
+ tail; 3) high-eccentricity migration (Giacalone et al. 2017; Owen
106
+ & Lai 2018) suggests that the orbits of close-in planets with
107
+ initially high eccentricities circularize with higher orbital peri-
108
+ ods; 4) decreasing planet size can be the result of photoevapo-
109
+ ration (Lopez & Fortney 2014; Lundkvist et al. 2016; Owen &
110
+ Lai 2018), Roche-lobe-overflow (Kurokawa & Nakamoto 2014),
111
+ “boil-off” (Owen & Wu 2016), and impact-based mass-loss
112
+ (Schlichting et al. 2015; Schlichting & Mukhopadhyay 2018).
113
+ Finally, (5) the tidal migration of hot Neptunes (Lin & Pa-
114
+ paloizou 1986; Rozner et al. 2022), tidally trapped outward mi-
115
+ gration (Masset et al. 2006), and disk migration (Mazeh et al.
116
+ 2016; Ataiee & Kley 2021) are other alternative scenarios.
117
+ Besides scenarios involving migration and evaporation, Bai-
118
+ ley & Batygin (2018) found that an accretion parameter corre-
119
+ lated with planet mass and disk inner edge can explain the upper
120
+ right side of the desert and explains its suggested slope of −2/7.
121
+ Ataiee & Kley (2021) suggested a further possibility, where or-
122
+ bital resonances change the orbital periods of the inner planets.
123
+ The curious case of TOI-2196 b (Persson et al. 2022) would fit in
124
+ well with migration-based scenarios, being a small and volatile-
125
+ rich planet present in the savanna.
126
+ Mazeh et al. (2016) derived relationships for the lower and
127
+ upper boundaries of the desert in the RP–P plane finding that at
128
+ the upper edge, RP ∝ P− 1
129
+ 3 , and at the lower edge, RP ∝ P
130
+ 2
131
+ 3 , thus
132
+ suggesting different origins in the two size-regimes. Matsakos &
133
+ Königl (2016) explained the two boundaries as the tidal disrup-
134
+ tion barrier for gas giants following their high-eccentricity mi-
135
+ grations and because of different mass-radius laws of low-mass
136
+ and high-mass exoplanets, the two edges are formed differently.
137
+ Owen & Lai (2018) suggested that the photoevaporation and the
138
+ high-eccentricity migration to form the upper and lower bound-
139
+ aries, respectively. Owen (2019) summarizes the processes that
140
+ could have formed the desert boundaries from an evaporation
141
+ approach, with a very detailed introduction to the astrophysical
142
+ processes. A somewhat similar structure in the period-radius dis-
143
+ tribution is related to the observed increasing sub-Saturn (≈ 4–
144
+ 8 R⊕) occurrence rate up to ∼300 days orbital period. Hallatt &
145
+ Lee (2022) argued for a radiation-induced process (resulting in
146
+ atmoshperic mass-loss), which is efficient at transforming sub-
147
+ Saturns into sub-Neptunes (≲4 R⊕), with short orbital periods.
148
+ The short-period end of this process is similar to the “process 3”
149
+ in our Fig.1 and could explain the lower boundary of the desert
150
+ as well.
151
+ In our earlier paper Szabó & Kálmán (2019), we found that
152
+ the boundaries of the desert depend more on fundamental stellar
153
+ parameters and less on planetary mass, density, and size. In that
154
+ work, the sample of exoplanets were smaller, which limited the
155
+ further inference. In this paper, we re-apply the same analyses
156
+ to the larger exoplanet data set at hand and we include a few
157
+ new tests as well. We show that the boundaries of the desert in
158
+ the period-mass (P – MP) and the period-radius (P – RP) planes
159
+ are marked by a different planet population. The desert in the
160
+ two main projections can be considered as a sign of multiple
161
+ scenarios of planetary evolution acting differently in the various
162
+ parameter spaces. Therefore, we revisited the P–MP and P–RP
163
+ boundaries separately, which allowed for the findings of Szabó
164
+ & Kálmán (2019) to be quantified. The dependence of the P–MP
165
+ and P–RP boundaries on the stellar parameters are to be consid-
166
+ ered as another piece of evidence to support this assertion. Fi-
167
+ nally, we give expressions for both the planetary radius and mass
168
+ in terms of stellar parameters and via fuzzy clustering. We con-
169
+ clude that in all projections, planets form two main groups that
170
+ behave differently, in a possible connection with the unresolved
171
+ processes behind the formation of the sub-Jovian or Neptunian
172
+ desert.
173
+ 2. Methods and data selection
174
+ 2.1. Data on confirmed planets from the NASA exoplanet
175
+ archive
176
+ The input to this analysis consists of two data sets. We followed
177
+ Szabó & Kálmán (2019) in building up the sample from the
178
+ NASA Exoplanet Archive (5009 planets in total1), following the
179
+ same filtering as in Szabó & Kálmán (2019). This filtering has
180
+ left out planets with less constrained parameters and kept the
181
+ “golden sample” only. In building up the test sample, we defined
182
+ the following selection criteria: (i) planetary mass MP < 13MJ
183
+ and density ρP < 25ρJ and (ii) relative uncertainty for the plan-
184
+ etary radius and mass of < 20% and < 60%, respectively, leav-
185
+ ing us with a sample of 650 exoplanets. This is an increment
186
+ with regard to the 406 planets in our previous analysis (Szabó
187
+ & Kálmán 2019) and our current sample also represents a better
188
+ quality because it also contains the filtering for the mass deter-
189
+ mination errors. We accepted the stellar parameters provided in
190
+ the original NASA Exoplanet Archive records.
191
+ In Fig. 1, we show the distribution of our filtered sample
192
+ (of 650 exoplanets) in the RP–P plane. Figures 2–8 show the
193
+ same sample in both the radius-period and mass-period param-
194
+ eter spaces. This design enables the visualization of the exact
195
+ values of the continous variable, but has the limitation of being
196
+ merely qualitative. To be able to quantitatively see the structures
197
+ in the sample, we applied two-sampled Kolmogorov-Smirnov
198
+ (KS) tests (see e.g., Feigelson & Babu 2012) to the projected
199
+ parameters in different regions (univariate bands) of the data dis-
200
+ tribution.
201
+ 1 The data were obtained from the Planetary Systems Compos-
202
+ ite Data database https://exoplanetarchive.ipac.caltech.
203
+ edu/cgi-bin/TblView/nph-tblView?app=ExoTbls&config=
204
+ PSCompPars on 5 April 2022.
205
+ Article number, page 2 of 11
206
+
207
+ Gy. M. Szabó
208
+ et al.: Sub-Jovian desert of exoplanets at its boundaries
209
+ Still following Szabó & Kálmán (2019), we defined two sta-
210
+ tistical regions in the RP – P plane as: the area between 0.28 and
211
+ 0.63 RJ is labeled A, and the one between 0.06 and 0.16RJ is
212
+ labeled B. In the MP – P plane, we defined the C region between
213
+ 0.032 − 0.305 MJ and the D region between 0.001 − 0.010 MJ.
214
+ To observe whether a stellar or planetary parameter is selec-
215
+ tive at the position of the border (in other words, the position of
216
+ the border depends on the examined parameter), we compared
217
+ the period distribution of two subsamples in A to those in B; and
218
+ two subsamples in C to those in D. The subsamples were sepa-
219
+ rated at the median of the examined parameter. For example, we
220
+ compared the period distribution of high-temperature and low-
221
+ temperature stars in A and B, etc. We compared the resulting pe-
222
+ riod distributions in a two-sampled KS test in all four regions and
223
+ computed the p values. If the resulting p is small, we can con-
224
+ clude that the two compared samples are drawn from different
225
+ distributions; or, in other words, the third parameter can affect
226
+ the distribution of exoplanets. Because regions A and C are in
227
+ the desert and B and D are outside, this comparison helps iden-
228
+ tify those parameters that affect the formation and the boundaries
229
+ of the desert.
230
+ Following the technique of colored scatter plots, we some-
231
+ times identified several groups of exoplanets following a spe-
232
+ cific pattern. These features can be proven with clustering meth-
233
+ ods. Here, we followed the fuzzy clustering algorithm of Bezdek
234
+ (1981), as implemented in the FKM function in the R software
235
+ package2.
236
+ 2.2. APOGEE catalog of planet-host stars
237
+ The second database we used for the analyses is based
238
+ on Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment
239
+ (APOGEE, Majewski et al. 2017), which provides homoge-
240
+ neously derived atmospheric stellar parameters and eliminates
241
+ uncertainties originating from the usage of different model atmo-
242
+ spheres, spectral synthesis codes, line lists, and so on. We built
243
+ an APOGEE exoplanet host stars catalog to test the findings on
244
+ this homogeneous data set and we plot the data in Figs. 10-11.
245
+ As part of the fourth iteration of Sloan Digital Sky Sur-
246
+ vey (SDSS-IV,
247
+ Blanton et al. 2017), in its final data release
248
+ (DR17, Abdurro’uf et al. 2022), the APOGEE-2 survey derived
249
+ and reported main atmospheric parameters and individual ele-
250
+ ment abundances for 733,901 stars across the entire sky (Za-
251
+ sowski et al. 2017) and focused on observing as many planet-
252
+ host stars as possible, so it is an excellent choice to cross-match
253
+ our sample with that of DR17. Observations were made with the
254
+ identical SDSS spectrographs (Wilson et al. 2019) mounted on
255
+ the 2.5-meter Sloan Foundation Telescope (Gunn et al. 2006)
256
+ and the 2.5-meter Irénée du Pont Telescope of Las Campanas
257
+ Observatory, Chile. The resolving power is R ∼ 22, 500 and the
258
+ spectral coverage of the near-infrared H-band – from 15140 Å to
259
+ 16940 Å. This makes it possible to select planet-host stars near
260
+ the Milky Way disk and dust obscured regions of the Milky Way.
261
+ Besides observing stellar targets, APOGEE is sensitive to sub-
262
+ stellar mass companions (exoplanet candidates) too, as multi-
263
+ epoch visits along with high-precision RV measurements are
264
+ available (Majewski et al. 2017).
265
+ The APOGEE DR17 collaboration published both raw and
266
+ calibrated values of effective temperature, surface gravity, and
267
+ applied offset corrections to [M/H] based on solar neighbor-
268
+ 2 R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical
269
+ computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
270
+ https://www.R-project.org/
271
+ -1.0
272
+ -0.5
273
+ 0.0
274
+ log Rp/RJ
275
+ -1
276
+ 0
277
+ 1
278
+ 2
279
+ 3
280
+ 4
281
+ -3
282
+ -2
283
+ -1
284
+ 0
285
+ 1
286
+ log Mp/MJ
287
+ log P [d]
288
+ -1.2
289
+ -0.8
290
+ -0.4
291
+ 0.0
292
+ 0.4
293
+ 0.8
294
+ 1.2
295
+ log ρP/ρJ
296
+ Fig. 2. Sub-Jovian/Neptune desert of exoplanets in the RP – P and MP
297
+ – P parameter spaces (top and bottom panel), colored by the planetary
298
+ density. In the top panel, the upper boundary is marked by “normal”
299
+ Jupiters with higher density (> 1ρJ), while in the bottom panel, the pop-
300
+ ulation of inflated planets (red points) appear below the normal Jupiters
301
+ and, thus, the inflated Jupiters mark the actual boundary.
302
+ hood stars. Here, we take the calibrated effective temperatures
303
+ and overall metallicities into account as Teff is in a better agree-
304
+ ment with the infrared flux method (IRFM) scale than the raw
305
+ spectroscopic values (Abdurro’uf et al. 2022). For this analy-
306
+ sis, we carefully select the most accurate and precise APOGEE
307
+ data. We globally filter out APOGEE stars labeled by the quality
308
+ control flag STAR_BAD3 (Abdurro’uf et al. 2022) (but retained
309
+ STAR_WARN), then we cross-matched the exoplanet catalog with
310
+ the APOGEE DR17 data set in TOPCAT version 4.8-2 (Tool for
311
+ OPerations on Catalogues And Tables, Taylor 2005) based on
312
+ the equatorial coordinates of the host stars (∆ < 1 arcsec). The
313
+ next step involved the implementation of several quality criteria:
314
+ relative error lower than 20% for RP, VSCATTER < 1 km/s for
315
+ RV variations, VERR < 1 km/s for RV error to filter out poten-
316
+ tial variable stars, and M_H_ERR < 0.1 dex for the metallicity
317
+ uncertainty.
318
+ We note that the selected elements fall into the APOGEE
319
+ data reduction categories of “most reliable” and “reliable”
320
+ with regards to the overall quailty of their derivation (see the
321
+ APOGEE DR17 website for more details).
322
+ 3. Results
323
+ 3.1. Different planets on the borders in projections
324
+ In Fig. 2, we show the filtered NASA Exoplanet Archive planets
325
+ in the RP–P and MP–P planes with the planet’s mean density as
326
+ a coloring variable. The comparison of the two scatter plots re-
327
+ veals an interesting feature. Planets with ≳ ρJ density, plotted as
328
+ blue dots, follow a similar distribution in both planes, with the
329
+ most important difference of the compressed size range of hot
330
+ 3 https://www.sdss.org/dr17/irspec/apogee-bitmasks/
331
+ The web documentation include detailed flagging descriptions.
332
+ Article number, page 3 of 11
333
+
334
+ IDA&A proofs: manuscript no. 44846corr
335
+ Jupiters (upper panel) that is related to well-understood plane-
336
+ tary physics. However, the group of low-density planets (plot-
337
+ ted in red) behave very differently between the two plots. These
338
+ planets have ≲ MJ mass and they can be found at the middle of
339
+ the mass distribution (lower panel), but they are among the most
340
+ inflated planets, and can be observed on the top of hot Jupiters
341
+ in the radius distribution (upper panel).
342
+ This distinct clump of planets suffers from a very significant
343
+ dislocation compared to the non-inflated or moderately inflated
344
+ planets, which requires explanation. Also, the low-density plan-
345
+ ets themselves form the upper boundary of the sub-Jovian (or
346
+ Neptunian) desert in the MP–P projection, while they tend to
347
+ be farther from the boundary than the hot Jupiters in the RP–
348
+ P plane. Indeed, in the RP–P plane, the hot Jupiters themselves
349
+ form the upper boundary of the desert.
350
+ The anonymous referee has pointed out that similar struc-
351
+ tures could be simple byproducts of the well-known increasing
352
+ bulk density above a 1.0 MJ planetary mass, due to the increas-
353
+ ing self-compression of the gas that builds up the planetary body.
354
+ To test the robustness of this finding, we used an empirical model
355
+ to describe the mass-density relations in general and we removed
356
+ this contribution from the scatter plot.
357
+ We calculated synthetic densities for each planet, following
358
+ Traub (2011); Mordasini et al. (2012) and based on mean radii
359
+ (Eq. (24) of (Mordasini et al. 2012). Since the applied model
360
+ equation is designed to reproduce theoretical radii for planets,
361
+ with semi-major axis a < 0.1 AU and 0.1 AU < a < 1 AU,
362
+ we further restricted our sample to include planets with a < 1
363
+ AU. Subtracting the logarithm of the resulting densities yielded
364
+ the distribution shown in Fig. 3. We find that the upper edge of
365
+ the desert in the MP – P plane (bottom panel of Fig. 3) is still
366
+ generally dominated by low residual-density planets, which are
367
+ then then observed to be further away from the sub-Jovian desert
368
+ in the RP – P plane (top panel of Fig. 3).
369
+ This suggests that the general density-mass relation does not
370
+ explain the observed phenomenon. Indeed, the scatter plots col-
371
+ ored with the residual log densities (Fig. 3) show a very similar
372
+ distribution to what we see in Fig. 2 and we can have the sub-
373
+ jective visual impression that Fig. 3 is even clearer. In any case,
374
+ our conclusion is that the found double population of close-in
375
+ giants is not a consequence of the density-mass relations, but it
376
+ is rather superimposed onto the general pattern of density distri-
377
+ butions. Taking the position of the planets with ρ/ρJ < 0 into
378
+ account, it seems to be quite plausible that their presence is pri-
379
+ mordially influenced by the desert boundaries. We also point out
380
+ that the exoplanets with longer orbital periods (> 10 days) which
381
+ have lower densities (red points on Fig. 2) remain roughly in the
382
+ same position relative to the desert in both planes of Fig. 2.
383
+ The analysis of the bulk densities (Fig. 2) thus suggests
384
+ the upper boundary of the desert has a multiform nature: it is
385
+ marked by ordinary hot Jupiters in one projection and inflated
386
+ hot Jupiters in the other projection. Since the planetary physics
387
+ behind these two distinct classes of hot Jupiters are different, this
388
+ also brings up the possibility that the formation of the desert is a
389
+ result of multiple processes (at least at the upper boundary): one
390
+ process acting on ordinary jot Jupiters and one another acting on
391
+ inflated hot Jupiters.
392
+ The possible biases behind the observed distribution can be
393
+ excluded by simple quantitative considerations. In particular,
394
+ 137 exoplanets falling into the ρP < 0.35 ρJ category were dis-
395
+ covered primarily with 18 different photometric facilities includ-
396
+ ing both ground-based and space telescopes, so their distribution
397
+ in the parameter-space cannot be devoted to some instrument-
398
+ specific selection distortion of some specific exoplanet discov-
399
+ -1.0
400
+ -0.5
401
+ 0.0
402
+ log Rp/RJ
403
+ -1
404
+ 0
405
+ 1
406
+ 2
407
+ 3
408
+ 4
409
+ -3
410
+ -2
411
+ -1
412
+ 0
413
+ 1
414
+ log Mp/MJ
415
+ log P [d]
416
+ -1.2
417
+ -0.8
418
+ -0.4
419
+ 0.0
420
+ 0.4
421
+ 0.8
422
+ 1.2
423
+ Residual log ρP/ρJ
424
+ Fig. 3. Scatterplots of the distribution of exoplanets in the RP – P and
425
+ MP – P planes as in Fig. 2 but with synthetic densities subtracted from
426
+ the observed ones (see text for details).
427
+ ery surveys. Also, from the entire sample of 650 exoplanets,
428
+ only 23 of them were not discovered with the transit method
429
+ (mostly radial velocity planets that had later been observed in
430
+ transit as well) and none of them belong to the inflated group
431
+ of planets (according to the definition given at the beginning of
432
+ this paragraph). Therefore, the presence of radial velocity dis-
433
+ coveries should not be considered as sources of biased data.
434
+ Out of the 137 exoplanets with ρP < 0.35 ρJ, an overwhelm-
435
+ ing majority (116) are members of planetary systems with a sin-
436
+ gle known planetary mass object, with 19 systems containing 2
437
+ planets and 2 containing 2 and 3 planets. The brightness distri-
438
+ bution of host stars in the two samples is also very similar, with
439
+ V = 10.56 ± 1.94 mag for the larger, 650-member sample and
440
+ 10.89 ± 1.59 mag for the low-density sample. We therefore see
441
+ no evidence for observational biases. We can consider two possi-
442
+ ble explanations for the multiple planet populations at the upper
443
+ boundary: (i) either the inflated planets are in the early stages
444
+ of planetary evolution and they are still in the process of initial
445
+ contraction or losing their atmospheres; or (ii) they are more ma-
446
+ ture planets, but have a different inner structure than the higher
447
+ density hot Jupiters. In either case, the processes that form the
448
+ desert must be selective for these formation scenarios, leading
449
+ to the two distinct planet populations at the two different projec-
450
+ tions of the upper boundary.
451
+ To test these scenarios, a wider sample with more precisely
452
+ determined exoplanet parameters is necessary. Our understand-
453
+ ing of these questions will be greatly improved by the two up-
454
+ coming ESA missions: Ariel (Tinetti et al. 2021) and PLATO
455
+ (Rauer et al. 2014).
456
+ 3.2. Dependence of the boundary on stellar parameters
457
+ In this subsection, we analyze the RP–P and MP–P scatter plots
458
+ with regard to the distribution of stellar parameters (effective
459
+ temperature, stellar radius, stellar mass, log g, and metallicity),
460
+ Article number, page 4 of 11
461
+
462
+ Gy. M. Szabó
463
+ et al.: Sub-Jovian desert of exoplanets at its boundaries
464
+ -1.0
465
+ -0.5
466
+ 0.0
467
+ log Rp/RJ
468
+ A
469
+ B
470
+ A
471
+ 0.0
472
+ 0.5
473
+ 1.0
474
+ Cum. distr.
475
+ log Teff < 3.73
476
+ log Teff > 3.73
477
+ p = 0.000014
478
+ B
479
+ 0.0
480
+ 0.5
481
+ 1.0
482
+ Cum. distr.
483
+ -1
484
+ 0
485
+ 1
486
+ 2
487
+ 3
488
+ 4
489
+ log Teff < 3.67
490
+ log Teff > 3.67
491
+ p = 0.45
492
+ log P [d]
493
+ -3
494
+ -2
495
+ -1
496
+ 0
497
+ 1
498
+ log Mp/MJ
499
+ C
500
+ D
501
+ C
502
+ 0.0
503
+ 0.5
504
+ 1.0
505
+ Cum. distr.
506
+ log Teff < 3.73
507
+ log Teff > 3.73
508
+ p = 0.00011
509
+ D
510
+ 0.0
511
+ 0.5
512
+ 1.0
513
+ Cum. distr.
514
+ -1
515
+ 0
516
+ 1
517
+ 2
518
+ 3
519
+ 4
520
+ log Teff < 3.53
521
+ log Teff > 3.53
522
+ p = 0.068
523
+ log P [d]
524
+ 3.4
525
+ 3.5
526
+ 3.6
527
+ 3.7
528
+ 3.8
529
+ 3.9
530
+ 4.0
531
+ log Teff [K]
532
+ Fig. 4. Scatterplot showing the distribution of exoplanets in the RP –
533
+ P (top left) and MP – P (top right) parameter spaces, colored by the
534
+ temperature of the host star (see the color bar for the values). The middle
535
+ and bottom panels show the cumulative distribution of the two samples
536
+ divided at the median of Teff in the A, B, C, and D regions. The p-values
537
+ of the KS-test are also shown.
538
+ complementing and extending the results described in Szabó &
539
+ Kálmán (2019).
540
+ 3.2.1. Effective temperature of the host
541
+ Following the recipe described in Sect. 2, we split the sample
542
+ of exoplanets at the median of the effective temperature of the
543
+ host stars in different regions separately. The split values were
544
+ 5370 K, 4677 K, 5370 K, and 3388 K for the A, B, C, and D
545
+ regions, respectively (see Fig. 4). We found that in both param-
546
+ eter spaces, planets in A and C regions tend to have shorter or-
547
+ bital periods around cooler hosts. The p-values of the KS tests
548
+ were: 10−5 and 10−4 in A and C, respectively. This discrepancy
549
+ in the cumulative distribution has not been observed in the B or
550
+ D regions (p-values: 0.45 and 0.07), proving that the observed
551
+ dependence is specifically located at the right boundary of the
552
+ desert. Therefore, we confirm the findings of Szabó & Kálmán
553
+ (2019) that the effective temperature of the host star plays a key
554
+ role in the formation of the desert and it does so in both param-
555
+ eter spaces.
556
+ 3.2.2. Stellar radius
557
+ The boundary of the desert also shows dependence on RS in both
558
+ the RP – P and MP – P planes, as visible in the scatter plots of
559
+ Fig. 5. The stars below the median radii (0.94 R⊙ and 0.90 R⊙ in
560
+ the A and C regions, respectively) are more likely to host plan-
561
+ ets with shorter orbital periods. We note that the KS test yields
562
+ p-values of 2 · 10−4 and 10−5 in A and C, respectively. There
563
+ is no significant difference in the cumulative distribution plan-
564
+ ets in the B and D regions. In B, the p-value is 0.43; while in
565
+ D, the p = 0.013 still corresponds to 2.48σ, proving the statis-
566
+ tical insignificance of the (otherwise apparent) differences seen
567
+ in the bottom right panel of 5. As we find that stars with lower
568
+ radii tend to host planets with shorter orbital periods and that this
569
+ phenomenon is not present in the control regions, we conclude
570
+ that the stellar radius also plays a key role in the formation of the
571
+ desert.
572
+ -1.0
573
+ -0.5
574
+ 0.0
575
+ log Rp/RJ
576
+ A
577
+ B
578
+ A
579
+ 0.0
580
+ 0.5
581
+ 1.0
582
+ Cum. distr.
583
+ RS < 0.94 Rʘ
584
+ RS > 0.94 Rʘ
585
+ p = 0.00017
586
+ B
587
+ 0.0
588
+ 0.5
589
+ 1.0
590
+ Cum. distr.
591
+ -1
592
+ 0
593
+ 1
594
+ 2
595
+ 3
596
+ 4
597
+ RS > 0.72 Rʘ
598
+ RS < 0.72 Rʘ
599
+ p = 0.43
600
+ log P [d]
601
+ -3
602
+ -2
603
+ -1
604
+ 0
605
+ 1
606
+ log Mp/MJ
607
+ C
608
+ D
609
+ C
610
+ 0.0
611
+ 0.5
612
+ 1.0
613
+ Cum. distr.
614
+ RS < 0.90 Rʘ
615
+ RS > 0.90 Rʘ
616
+ p = 0.00096
617
+ D
618
+ 0.0
619
+ 0.5
620
+ 1.0
621
+ Cum. distr.
622
+ -1
623
+ 0
624
+ 1
625
+ 2
626
+ 3
627
+ 4
628
+ RS < 0.34 Rʘ
629
+ RS > 0.34 Rʘ
630
+ p = 0.013
631
+ log P [d]
632
+ -0.8
633
+ -0.6
634
+ -0.4
635
+ -0.2
636
+ 0.0
637
+ 0.2
638
+ 0.4
639
+ 0.6
640
+ log RS/Rʘ
641
+ Fig. 5. Scatterplots showing the distribution of exoplanets in the RP – P
642
+ and MP – P parameter spaces with RS used as the third parameter (top
643
+ row) and the respective cumulative distributions (middle and bottom
644
+ rows; same as Fig. 4).
645
+ -1.0
646
+ -0.5
647
+ 0.0
648
+ log Rp/RJ
649
+ A
650
+ B
651
+ A
652
+ 0.0
653
+ 0.5
654
+ 1.0
655
+ Cum. distr.
656
+ MS < 0.92 Mʘ
657
+ MS > 0.92 Mʘ
658
+ p = 0.000056
659
+ B
660
+ 0.0
661
+ 0.5
662
+ 1.0
663
+ Cum. distr.
664
+ -1
665
+ 0
666
+ 1
667
+ 2
668
+ 3
669
+ 4
670
+ MS < 0.76 Mʘ
671
+ MS > 0.76 Mʘ
672
+ p = 0.45
673
+ log P [d]
674
+ -3
675
+ -2
676
+ -1
677
+ 0
678
+ 1
679
+ log Mp/MJ
680
+ C
681
+ D
682
+ C
683
+ 0.0
684
+ 0.5
685
+ 1.0
686
+ Cum. distr.
687
+ MS < 0.92 Mʘ
688
+ MS > 0.92 Mʘ
689
+ p = 0.055
690
+ D
691
+ 0.0
692
+ 0.5
693
+ 1.0
694
+ Cum. distr.
695
+ -1
696
+ 0
697
+ 1
698
+ 2
699
+ 3
700
+ 4
701
+ MS < 0.34 Mʘ
702
+ MS > 0.34 Mʘ
703
+ p = 0.013
704
+ log P [d]
705
+ -2.0
706
+ -1.6
707
+ -1.2
708
+ -0.8
709
+ -0.4
710
+ 0.0
711
+ 0.4
712
+ log MS/Mʘ
713
+ Fig. 6. Scatterplots showing the distribution of exoplanets in the RP – P
714
+ and MP – P parameter spaces with MS used as the third parameter (top
715
+ row) and the respective cumulative distributions (middle and bottom
716
+ rows; same as Fig. 4).
717
+ 3.2.3. Stellar mass
718
+ The scatter plot of exoplanets with the mass of the host star used
719
+ as the third parameter is shown in Fig. 6. The split values of MS
720
+ are 0.92 M⊙, 0.76 M⊙, 0.92 M⊙, and 0.34 M⊙ in A, B, C, and
721
+ D, respectively. Dividing the samples in the four regions at these
722
+ values leads to an ambiguous detection of MS dependence of the
723
+ desert boundary (i.e., the distribution of planets at the size ranges
724
+ of the desert). This is expressed in terms of the p-values of 6·10−5
725
+ opposed to 0.45 in A and B regions, and then 0.055 opposed to
726
+ 0.013 in C and D regions. The dependence is present in the RP–
727
+ P plane and is insignificant in the MP–P plane, consistently with
728
+ the results of Szabó & Kálmán (2019). Therefore, we find that
729
+ stellar mass has some influence most importantly on the radius
730
+ distribution, but does not play an essential role in the formation
731
+ of the desert on its own.
732
+ Article number, page 5 of 11
733
+
734
+ IDA&A proofs: manuscript no. 44846corr
735
+ -1.0
736
+ -0.5
737
+ 0.0
738
+ log Rp/RJ
739
+ A
740
+ B
741
+ A
742
+ 0.0
743
+ 0.5
744
+ 1.0
745
+ Cum. distr.
746
+ log g < 4.46
747
+ log g > 4.46
748
+ p = 0.040
749
+ B
750
+ 0.0
751
+ 0.5
752
+ 1.0
753
+ Cum. distr.
754
+ -1
755
+ 0
756
+ 1
757
+ 2
758
+ 3
759
+ 4
760
+ log g < 4.60
761
+ log g > 4.60
762
+ p = 0.22
763
+ log P [d]
764
+ -3
765
+ -2
766
+ -1
767
+ 0
768
+ 1
769
+ log Mp/MJ
770
+ C
771
+ D
772
+ C
773
+ 0.0
774
+ 0.5
775
+ 1.0
776
+ Cum. distr.
777
+ log g < 4.48
778
+ log g > 4.48
779
+ p = 0.0055
780
+ D
781
+ 0.0
782
+ 0.5
783
+ 1.0
784
+ Cum. distr.
785
+ -1
786
+ 0
787
+ 1
788
+ 2
789
+ 3
790
+ 4
791
+ log g < 4.87
792
+ log g > 4.87
793
+ p = 0.37
794
+ log P [d]
795
+ 3.0
796
+ 3.2
797
+ 3.4
798
+ 3.6
799
+ 3.8
800
+ 4.0
801
+ 4.2
802
+ 4.4
803
+ 4.6
804
+ 4.8
805
+ 5.0
806
+ 5.2
807
+ log g [cgs]
808
+ Fig. 7. Same as Fig. 4 but with log g used as the third parameter instead
809
+ of Teff.
810
+ -1.0
811
+ -0.5
812
+ 0.0
813
+ log Rp/RJ
814
+ A
815
+ B
816
+ A
817
+ 0.0
818
+ 0.5
819
+ 1.0
820
+ Cum. distr.
821
+ [M/H] < 0.16
822
+ [M/H] > 0.16
823
+ p = 0.088
824
+ B
825
+ 0.0
826
+ 0.5
827
+ 1.0
828
+ Cum. distr.
829
+ -1
830
+ 0
831
+ 1
832
+ 2
833
+ 3
834
+ 4
835
+ [M/H] < 0.01
836
+ [M/H] > 0.01
837
+ p = 0.27
838
+ log P [d]
839
+ -3
840
+ -2
841
+ -1
842
+ 0
843
+ 1
844
+ log Mp/MJ
845
+ C
846
+ D
847
+ C
848
+ 0.0
849
+ 0.5
850
+ 1.0
851
+ Cum. distr.
852
+ [M/H] < 0.11
853
+ [M/H] > 0.11
854
+ p = 0.0075
855
+ D
856
+ 0.0
857
+ 0.5
858
+ 1.0
859
+ Cum. distr.
860
+ -1
861
+ 0
862
+ 1
863
+ 2
864
+ 3
865
+ 4
866
+ [M/H] < -0.01
867
+ [M/H] > -0.01
868
+ p = 0.30
869
+ log P [d]
870
+ -0.5
871
+ -0.4
872
+ -0.3
873
+ -0.2
874
+ -0.1
875
+ 0.0
876
+ 0.1
877
+ 0.2
878
+ 0.3
879
+ 0.4
880
+ 0.5
881
+ [M/H]
882
+ Fig. 8. Same as Fig. 4 but with [M/H] used as the third parameter instead
883
+ of Teff.
884
+ 3.2.4. Stellar log g
885
+ Exploring the effects of log g on the distribution of exoplanets
886
+ in the two parameter spaces, we divided the samples at log g =
887
+ 4.46 in the A region, log g = 4.60 in B, log g = 4.48 in C, and
888
+ log g = 4.87 in D. We find that there is no statistical difference
889
+ in the cumulative distributions in either the A or B regions of the
890
+ RP – P plane. This is expressed by the p-values of the KS-test:
891
+ 0.040 in A (corresponding to ∼ 2.1σ) and 0.22 in B. In the size
892
+ ranges of the desert of the MP – P parameter space, there is a
893
+ hint of a discrepancy between the cumulative distributions of the
894
+ sample divided at the median at p = 0.0055 (corresponding to
895
+ 2.78σ). There is no such difference in the sample of the control
896
+ region (p = 0.34).
897
+ We therefore find no firm dependence of the desert on the
898
+ surface gravity of the host star, contradicting to the earlier re-
899
+ sults of Szabó & Kálmán (2019) (based on fewer planets and
900
+ unconstrained for a reliable mass determination). The structure
901
+ of Fig. 7 the most inflated hot Jupiters are hosted by stars with
902
+ the lowest log g values (< 3.2) from the sample.
903
+ 3.2.5. Stellar metallicity
904
+ In the filtered sample of 650 used in the exploration of the pre-
905
+ vious parameters, there are 10 stars with unknown metallicities
906
+ and we omitted those from the current analysis. The samples in
907
+ A, B, C, and D are split at [M/H]= 0.16, 0.01, 0.11, and −0.01,
908
+ respectively. There is no significant difference in the cumulative
909
+ distribution of planets in the two examined areas of the RP – P
910
+ plane (p-values are 0.088 and 0.27 in A and B). In the case of
911
+ the MP – P plane, there is also only a hint that planets from the
912
+ C region are more likely to have shorter orbital periods around
913
+ younger, more metal-rich stars, expressed via p = 0.0075 (cor-
914
+ responding to 2.67σ) in C compared to 0.30 in D.
915
+ As in the case of log g, we find no firm dependence of the
916
+ sub-Jovian desert of exoplanets on the metallicity of the host
917
+ stars. This is somewhat contradictory to the results of Dong et al.
918
+ (2018); Petigura et al. (2018) and Szabó & Kálmán (2019).
919
+ 3.3. Multimodal dependence of the planetary mass and
920
+ radius on stellar parameters
921
+ The experienced bimodality of the planet groups at the border
922
+ of the desert Fig. 4 and the experienced differences behind the
923
+ RP–P and MP–P relations reflect the presence of two different
924
+ type of planets at the border: hot Jupiters at the upper bound-
925
+ ary and super-Earths at the lower boundary. As the boundary
926
+ of the desert in the mass and radius projections depend on stel-
927
+ lar parameters, we expect to see various groups of planets with
928
+ different parameter dependencies between the radius, mass, and
929
+ stellar parameters.
930
+ To explore distinct correlation laws between the planet and
931
+ stellar parameters, we divided our sample into two subgroups
932
+ in both the mass-metallicity and the radius-metallicity planes
933
+ via a k-means fuzzy clustering algorithm (Ferraro et al. 2019).
934
+ In the radius-metallicity plane, the resulting cluster consist-
935
+ ing hot Jupiters had a median radius of 1.15 RJ (interquar-
936
+ tile range of 1.01-1.33) and a cluster consisting Neptune- and
937
+ Earth-sized planets had a median radius of 0.21 RJ (interquar-
938
+ tile range of 0.14–0.27). When the clustering was done in the
939
+ mass-metallicity distribution, the cluster of large planets had a
940
+ median mass of 0.93 MJ (interquartile range of 0.57–1.80) and
941
+ the subgroup of smaller planets has a mean mass of 0.026 MJ
942
+ (interquartile range of 0.015–0.048).
943
+ We fit linear regression models describing the dependence
944
+ of planet mass and radius on Teff, MS , and [M/H]. Between the
945
+ planet size and the effective temperature, we get:
946
+ log
947
+ � MP
948
+ MJ
949
+
950
+ = 1.91(34) · log
951
+ �Teff
952
+ 1 K
953
+
954
+ − 7.15(1.27),
955
+ r = 0.48,
956
+ (1)
957
+ log
958
+ �RP
959
+ RJ
960
+
961
+ = 2.05(9) · log
962
+ �Teff
963
+ 1 K
964
+
965
+ − 3.88(33),
966
+ r = 0.50,
967
+ (2)
968
+ in the “large planet” cluster and
969
+ log
970
+ � MP
971
+ MJ
972
+
973
+ = 2.04(25) · log
974
+ �Teff
975
+ 1 K
976
+
977
+ − 9.09(91),
978
+ r = 0.27,
979
+ (3)
980
+ log
981
+ �RP
982
+ RJ
983
+
984
+ = 0.85(12) · log
985
+ �Teff
986
+ 1 K
987
+
988
+ − 3.83(46),
989
+ r = 0.43,
990
+ (4)
991
+ in the “small planets” cluster. In the expressions, the ambiguity
992
+ (standard deviation) of the last digits are shown in parentheses
993
+ after the value of each coefficients.
994
+ Article number, page 6 of 11
995
+
996
+ Gy. M. Szabó
997
+ et al.: Sub-Jovian desert of exoplanets at its boundaries
998
+ 3.4
999
+ 3.6
1000
+ 3.8
1001
+ 4.0
1002
+ -1.5
1003
+ -1.0
1004
+ -0.5
1005
+ 0.0
1006
+ 0.5
1007
+ r = 0.50
1008
+ r = 0.43
1009
+ log Teff [K]
1010
+ log Rp/RJ
1011
+ -3
1012
+ -2
1013
+ -1
1014
+ 0
1015
+ 1
1016
+ r = 0.48
1017
+ r = 0.27
1018
+ log Mp/MJ
1019
+ -1.0
1020
+ -0.5
1021
+ 0.0
1022
+ 0.5
1023
+ r = 0.46
1024
+ r = 0.47
1025
+ log MS/Mʘ
1026
+ r = 0.55
1027
+ r = 0.22
1028
+ -0.6
1029
+ -0.4
1030
+ -0.2
1031
+ 0
1032
+ 0.2
1033
+ 0.4
1034
+ 0.6
1035
+ r = -0.18
1036
+ r = 0.17
1037
+ [M/H]
1038
+ r = -0.03
1039
+ r = 0.29
1040
+ Fig. 9. Correlation between planet mass (top row), planetary radius (bottom row), and the main stellar parameters: Teff (left column), MS (middle
1041
+ column), and [M/H] (right column). The samples are divided into two groups via a fuzzy clustering algorithm applied to the distributions in
1042
+ the right panels. Blue points: Cluster of “larger planets.” Red points: Cluster of ‘smaller planets.” The fitted linear trends of Eqs. (2)–(11) are
1043
+ plotted with solid blue and red lines. Pearson’s r values, corresponding to the giant and smaller exoplanets are also displayed with blue and red,
1044
+ respectively.
1045
+ The expressions involving the stellar mass are:
1046
+ log
1047
+ � MP
1048
+ MJ
1049
+
1050
+ = 0.78(17) · log
1051
+ � MS
1052
+ M⊙
1053
+
1054
+ − 0.02(2),
1055
+ r = 0.55,
1056
+ (5)
1057
+ log
1058
+ �RP
1059
+ RJ
1060
+
1061
+ = 0.48(4) · log
1062
+ � MS
1063
+ M⊙
1064
+
1065
+ − 0.04(1),
1066
+ r = 0.46,
1067
+ (6)
1068
+ in the “large planet” cluster and
1069
+ log
1070
+ � MP
1071
+ MJ
1072
+
1073
+ = 0.94(9) · log
1074
+ � MS
1075
+ M⊙
1076
+
1077
+ − 1.46(3),
1078
+ r = 0.22,
1079
+ (7)
1080
+ log
1081
+ �RP
1082
+ RJ
1083
+
1084
+ = 0.37(5) · log
1085
+ � MS
1086
+ M⊙
1087
+
1088
+ − 0.64(1),
1089
+ r = 0.47,
1090
+ (8)
1091
+ in the “small planet” cluster. Such a correlation between planet
1092
+ size and stellar mass (but without clustering) was also noted by
1093
+ Fortney et al. (2007); Wu (2019), and Lozovsky et al. (2021). Wu
1094
+ (2019) found the linear coefficient between log MP and log MS to
1095
+ be unity, which is in good agreement with Eq. (7). These findings
1096
+ are also consistent with the qualitative observations from Fig. 6
1097
+ that the most massive stars from our sample (MS > 1.5 M⊙)
1098
+ host the largest and least dense hot Jupiters, those with radii of
1099
+ > 1.4 RJ.
1100
+ For the stellar metallicity dependencies, we get
1101
+ log
1102
+ � MP
1103
+ MJ
1104
+
1105
+ = −0.07(11) · [M/H] + 0.01(2),
1106
+ r = −0.03,
1107
+ (9)
1108
+ log
1109
+ �RP
1110
+ RJ
1111
+
1112
+ = −0.12(3) · [M/H] + 0.07(1),
1113
+ r = −0.18,
1114
+ (10)
1115
+ in the “large planet” cluster and
1116
+ log
1117
+ � MP
1118
+ MJ
1119
+
1120
+ = 0.94(9) · [M/H] − 1.45(3),
1121
+ r = 0.29,
1122
+ (11)
1123
+ log
1124
+ �RP
1125
+ RJ
1126
+
1127
+ = 0.17(7) · [M/H] − 0.70(7),
1128
+ r = 0.17
1129
+ (12)
1130
+ in the “small planet” cluster. Wu (2019) suggested that there is
1131
+ no correlation between stellar metallicity and planetary mass,
1132
+ which is compatible to the low values of correlation coefficients
1133
+ found in our analysis.
1134
+ The p value of these multiple correlations are in the range
1135
+ of 10−4 and 10−16 for all equations –except the ones involv-
1136
+ ing [M/H] (Eqs. 9-12), which have p values between 0.01–0.5,
1137
+ showing marginally significant or even, insignificant correla-
1138
+ tions. The bimodality of the correlations illustrate that there is
1139
+ no one-to-one relationship between planet sizes and stellar pa-
1140
+ rameters. It can be said, however, that in almost every case (with
1141
+ the exception of RP – MS ), a stronger correlation is found in
1142
+ the case of large exoplanets. In these linear models, no under-
1143
+ lying astrophysical connections are considered, they are based
1144
+ solely on statistics; however, in future works, they can be used
1145
+ to further consider the reasons and processes which shape these
1146
+ dependencies.
1147
+ 3.3.1. Elemental abundances from APOGEE
1148
+ The APOGEE stellar parameters were taken from a homoge-
1149
+ neous, state-of-the-art quality catalog of stellar data, while the
1150
+ sources of stellar data in the NASA Exoplanet Archive are in-
1151
+ homogeneous, although the latter one includes many more plan-
1152
+ ets, which can increase the significance of the statistical analysis
1153
+ based upon it.
1154
+ From the APOGEE planet sample (Sect. 2.2), we repeated
1155
+ the fits described in Eqs. (2), (6), (3), and (7) leading to the fol-
1156
+ lowing regressions:
1157
+ log
1158
+ �RP
1159
+ RJ
1160
+
1161
+ = 1.21(43) · log
1162
+ �Teff
1163
+ 1 K
1164
+
1165
+ − 4.65(1.60),
1166
+ r = 0.25 (13)
1167
+ log
1168
+ �RP
1169
+ RJ
1170
+
1171
+ = −0.03(5) · [M/H] − 0.11(3),
1172
+ r = −0.05 (14)
1173
+ Article number, page 7 of 11
1174
+
1175
+ IDA&A proofs: manuscript no. 44846corr
1176
+ 3.6
1177
+ 3.7
1178
+ 3.8
1179
+ -1.5
1180
+ -1.0
1181
+ -0.5
1182
+ 0.0
1183
+ 0.5
1184
+ r = 0.25
1185
+ r = 0.18
1186
+ log Teff [K]
1187
+ log Rp/RJ
1188
+ -0.6
1189
+ -0.4
1190
+ -0.2
1191
+ 0
1192
+ 0.2
1193
+ 0.4
1194
+ 0.6
1195
+ r = -0.05
1196
+ r = 0.02
1197
+ [M/H]
1198
+ Fig. 10. Correlations between RP – Teff (left panel) and RP – [M/H] (same as the lower left and lower right panels of Fig. 9) showing the fuzzy
1199
+ clustering of APOGEE data and with the linear regressions of Eqs. (14)–(16) overplotted.
1200
+ -1
1201
+ 0
1202
+ 1
1203
+ 2
1204
+ 3
1205
+ 4
1206
+ -1.0
1207
+ -0.5
1208
+ 0.0
1209
+ log Rp/RJ
1210
+ log P [d]
1211
+ -0.5
1212
+ -0.3
1213
+ -0.1
1214
+ 0.1
1215
+ 0.3
1216
+ [M/H]
1217
+ -1
1218
+ 0
1219
+ 1
1220
+ 2
1221
+ 3
1222
+ 4
1223
+ log P [d]
1224
+ -0.5
1225
+ -0.3
1226
+ -0.1
1227
+ 0.1
1228
+ 0.3
1229
+ Residual [M/H]
1230
+ Fig. 11. Distribution of exoplanets from the APOGEE planet host sample with [M/H] as the coloring parameter (left panel) and the residuals after
1231
+ a bilinear fit (right panel).
1232
+ in the “large planet” cluster and
1233
+ log
1234
+ �RP
1235
+ RJ
1236
+
1237
+ = 0.61(14) · log
1238
+ �Teff
1239
+ 1 K
1240
+
1241
+ − 3.05(53),
1242
+ r = 0.18
1243
+ (15)
1244
+ log
1245
+ �RP
1246
+ RJ
1247
+
1248
+ = 0.02(5) · [M/H] − 0.79(1),
1249
+ r = 0.02
1250
+ (16)
1251
+ in the “small planet” cluster (these clusters and the linear models
1252
+ are shown in Fig. 10). Here, we can see that the APOGEE data
1253
+ reproduced the previously determined coefficients of Teff in both
1254
+ clusters, with larger ambiguities due to the significantly fewer
1255
+ planets in the currently availagble APOGEE sample. Also, the r
1256
+ regression coefficients are smaller. In the case of the R–Teff cor-
1257
+ relations, we see no significant dependence in the APOGEE data
1258
+ (the ambiguity of the coefficient of Teff is larger than the value,
1259
+ hence, 0 is within the range) and the r regression coefficients are
1260
+ also close to zero. Here, the APOGEE analysis reproduced the
1261
+ small correlation coefficients between RP and [M/H]. We note
1262
+ that as the uncertainties in the APOGEE data were also derived
1263
+ in a homogeneous way, we used these as weights for our regres-
1264
+ sion.
1265
+ The APOGEE data also contains the derived abundances4
1266
+ for a number of elements. We also repeated the linear modeling
1267
+ described above for individual elements inculding C, C I (union-
1268
+ ized C), N, O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, K, Ca, Mn, Co, Ni, Ce, and [C/O]
1269
+ to check for correlations between the relative abundance ratio of
1270
+ these elements and the planetary radius (Table 1). In both clus-
1271
+ ters of “larger” and “smaller” planets, the relationship between
1272
+ the planetary radius and any given X abundance is characterized
1273
+ by the slope of the line (k) and the intercept with the ordinate
1274
+ (n), such that:
1275
+ log RP
1276
+ RJ
1277
+ = k log X
1278
+ X⊙
1279
+ + n.
1280
+ (17)
1281
+ To show an example of the fitted distributions, the left panel
1282
+ of Fig. 11 shows the exoplanets in the RP – P plane with the
1283
+ 4 https://www.sdss.org/dr17/irspec/abundances/
1284
+ Article number, page 8 of 11
1285
+
1286
+ Gy. M. Szabó
1287
+ et al.: Sub-Jovian desert of exoplanets at its boundaries
1288
+ metallicity as the coloring parameter taken from the APOGEE
1289
+ planet host sample. The right panel shows the residuals after re-
1290
+ moving the bilinear trend according to Eq. (18), which is very
1291
+ similar to the uncorrected one. The comparison of the two panels
1292
+ show that the significant features which can be partly explained
1293
+ by the metallicity includes a negative metallicity gradient along
1294
+ the period (at the boundary, stars with a metallicity higher than
1295
+ 0 are overabundant), mostly affecting the group of smaller plan-
1296
+ ets, and a gradient along the radius. The large end of “smaller
1297
+ planets” and hot Jupiters tend to have increased metallicity. The
1298
+ appropriate KS-test here did not reveal differences of the metal-
1299
+ licity distributions near and far from the edge of the desert. The
1300
+ plots for individual elements reproduced a very similar pattern,
1301
+ which we discuss below.
1302
+ Table 1 shows those elements which we have found to be
1303
+ significantly correlated with the planetary radius within either
1304
+ the “larger planet” or the “smaller planet” sample. As a conclu-
1305
+ sion, O, Na, and K can influence the size distribution within the
1306
+ smaller planet group, while marginal significance was found in
1307
+ the case of N and Si in the “smaller planet” group as well. We
1308
+ found that only Mg influences the radius of planets in the “large”
1309
+ groups.
1310
+ Correlations extending to the group of all planets, including
1311
+ both the "larger planet” and the “smaller planet” samples are fit-
1312
+ ted with a bilinear regression in the period–radius plane. This
1313
+ equation is expressed as follows:
1314
+ log X
1315
+ X⊙
1316
+ = a · log P + b · log RP
1317
+ RJ
1318
+ + c,
1319
+ (18)
1320
+ where a, b, and c are the coefficients of the linear regression. Ta-
1321
+ ble 2 shows those elements where a significant (p < 0.05) cor-
1322
+ relation was found. The most significant chemical parameter in
1323
+ the period–radius plane is the [M/H] itself, being very significant
1324
+ in both coordinates and we consider the overal metallicity as the
1325
+ most important forming parameter of the desert as well. The in-
1326
+ dividual abundances, on the other hand, give us more insights to
1327
+ how the overall metallicity determines the chemical dependence
1328
+ of the desert boundaries.
1329
+ The elements with significant effect of the period–radius dis-
1330
+ tribution, besides what is explained by the [Fe/H], include C, N,
1331
+ O, Mg, Al, Si, K, and Mn. In addition, we did not find significant
1332
+ dependence involving Co and Ce (although these elements were
1333
+ determined only for 14 exoplanet-host stars), as well as [Ca/Fe],
1334
+ [Ni/Fe], and [C/O].
1335
+ A comparison of Tables 1 and 2 shows that volatiles from
1336
+ the CNO process (especially N and O), moderately refractory
1337
+ alpha-process elements (Mg and Si) and K influence both the
1338
+ global structure of the planetary distribution – surrounding the
1339
+ desert as well – and they have positive correlations with the ra-
1340
+ dius of smaller planets. Stars with increased N, O, Na, and Si,
1341
+ or decreased K abundances tend to form larger planets is the
1342
+ “smaller planet” groups. In the “large planet” group, only Mg
1343
+ is inversely correlated to the planet sizes. This revealed a set of
1344
+ elements that have a significant internal influence to the sizes of
1345
+ smaller and larger planets are disjointed, which serves as strong
1346
+ evidence that the formation and evolution of smaller and larger
1347
+ planets follow a chemical bimodality.
1348
+ Table 2 shows that the difference between the smaller/larger
1349
+ groups of planets and the global period–radius maps is related to
1350
+ mostly those elements that also appeared in Table 1. Additional
1351
+ elements appear in Table 2 as C, Al, and Mn. This also corrob-
1352
+ orates the interpretation that elements forming in CNO cycle or
1353
+ alpha process in stellar nucleosynthesis have an influence on the
1354
+ period-radius distribution of the planetary system. Interestingly,
1355
+ all refractory elements showed no or insignificant correlations
1356
+ in both tests, which elements (having the highest condensation
1357
+ temperatures, Tcond > 1500 K) are often considered as the ini-
1358
+ tially condensed material in the protoplanetary disks (Scott &
1359
+ Sanders 2009), and the condensation center for less refractory
1360
+ and volatile materials in further steps. The distribution of plan-
1361
+ ets in the period-radius plane and around the desert seems to be
1362
+ related to more or less volatile elements in the atmosphere, rather
1363
+ than the refractory elements condensed in the cores. Therefore,
1364
+ the desert itself appears to be a predominantly atmospheric fea-
1365
+ ture, rather than a “core” feature, confirming the significance of
1366
+ atmospheric evaporation in its formation.
1367
+ 4. Discussion
1368
+ Based on the data presented in Sects. 3.2.1–3.2.5, we could gen-
1369
+ erally confirm the results of Szabó & Kálmán (2019). Most im-
1370
+ portantly, the dependence of the desert boundary on the stellar
1371
+ effective temperature, which had been interpreted as an evidence
1372
+ for the photoevaporation, have been confirmed in the present
1373
+ study as well. An important new detail to this early interpreta-
1374
+ tion is the detection of a multiple and distinct population of hot
1375
+ Jupiters, having inflated and normal hot Jupiters at the bound-
1376
+ ary in the RP–P and the MP–P planes, respectively. Inflated hot
1377
+ Jupiters on the border can be a naturally seen as a new piece
1378
+ of evidence for the scenarios invoking photoevaporation (e.g.,
1379
+ Owen & Lai 2018), while the not inflated Jupiters at the bound-
1380
+ ary in the RP–P plane suggests a multiple track leading to the
1381
+ formation of the desert.
1382
+ We also found that the previously claimed metallicity depen-
1383
+ dence of the border are in general less significant than expected
1384
+ previously. The earlier interpretation of the claimed detection
1385
+ was also interpreted in connection to the evaporation scenarios,
1386
+ as the more effective cooling of a metal-rich atmosphere was
1387
+ claimed to form more irradiation-endurant exoplanets. Our new
1388
+ results have demonstrated that planetary occurrence indeed re-
1389
+ veals a dependence between the period, radius, and metallicity
1390
+ (in an agreement with the results of e.g. Demangeon et al. (2018)
1391
+ and Petigura et al. (2018)), even though it has not been confirmed
1392
+ as a specific characteristic of the planets near the desert bound-
1393
+ aries.
1394
+ The crowd of the exoplanets with spectroscopically detected
1395
+ atmospheric escape (dos Santos et al. 2021) can also be con-
1396
+ sidered as an evidence of irradiation effects forming the desert,
1397
+ because most of these planets are seen at the boundaries, or at
1398
+ least very close to it (Lecavelier des Etangs, personal commu-
1399
+ nication). It can also be pointed out from Fig. 4 that the hottest
1400
+ stars in our sample (with Teff ∼ 8000 – 10000 K) tend to host
1401
+ the largest and most massive hot Jupiters. A general trend that
1402
+ larger planets are more likely to be hosted by hotter stars can
1403
+ be observed from the median Teff values from A, B, C, and D
1404
+ regions. Similar statements can be made upon examination of
1405
+ Figs. 5 and 6; namely that stars with larger radius or mass are
1406
+ more likely to host larger planets. Lozovsky et al. (2021) sug-
1407
+ gested that larger radii of planets surrounding larger stars are a
1408
+ result of different compositions: larger stars tend to host planets
1409
+ with larger H-He mass fractions. Stars with higher metallicities
1410
+ are likely to host larger planets, extending to periods as long as
1411
+ ≈20 days at least (Owen & Murray-Clay 2018). The explana-
1412
+ tion of the occurrence rate includes the cores of planets around
1413
+ more metal-rich stars to be more massive, hence, they can col-
1414
+ lect more initial atmospheric mass; and the photoevaporation of
1415
+ a more metal-rich atmosphere is more resistant to stellar irradia-
1416
+ Article number, page 9 of 11
1417
+
1418
+ IDA&A proofs: manuscript no. 44846corr
1419
+ Table 1. Fitted linear models to the distribution of exoplanets in the planetary radius-abundance parameter spaces for the two clusters.
1420
+ Element
1421
+ N1
1422
+ k ± ∆k
1423
+ n ± ∆n
1424
+ r2
1425
+ p3
1426
+ N1
1427
+ k ± ∆k
1428
+ n ± ∆n
1429
+ r2
1430
+ p3
1431
+ Larger planets
1432
+ Smaller planets
1433
+ [N/Fe]
1434
+ 106
1435
+ −0.04 ± 0.11
1436
+ −0.10 ± 0.03
1437
+ 0.04
1438
+ 0.72
1439
+ 490
1440
+ 0.11 ± 0.06
1441
+ −0.79 ± 0.01
1442
+ 0.09
1443
+ 0.06
1444
+ [O/Fe]
1445
+ 106
1446
+ 0.35 ± 0.23
1447
+ −0.13 ± 0.02
1448
+ 0.15
1449
+ 0.12
1450
+ 567
1451
+ 0.21 ± 0.10
1452
+ −0.83 ± 0.01
1453
+ 0.09
1454
+ 0.03
1455
+ [Na/Fe]
1456
+ 85
1457
+ −0.08 ± 0.08
1458
+ −0.77 ± 0.09
1459
+ 0.10
1460
+ 0.34
1461
+ 519
1462
+ 0.20 ± 0.08
1463
+ −0.67 ± 0.02
1464
+ 0.11
1465
+ 0.01
1466
+ [Mg/Fe]
1467
+ 106
1468
+ −0.51 ± 0.24
1469
+ −0.08 ± 0.03
1470
+ 0.20
1471
+ 0.04
1472
+ 568
1473
+ −0.03 ± 0.09
1474
+ −0.79 ± 0.01
1475
+ 0.01
1476
+ 0.77
1477
+ [Si/Fe]
1478
+ 106
1479
+ 0.30 ± 0.32
1480
+ −0.10 ± 0.03
1481
+ 0.09
1482
+ 0.35
1483
+ 568
1484
+ 0.22 ± 0.12
1485
+ −0.80 ± 0.01
1486
+ 0.07
1487
+ 0.08
1488
+ [K/Fe]
1489
+ 107
1490
+ −0.08 ± 0.17
1491
+ −0.11 ± 0.02
1492
+ 0.04
1493
+ 0.66
1494
+ 566
1495
+ −0.16 ± 0.07
1496
+ −0.80 ± 0.01
1497
+ 0.09
1498
+ 0.03
1499
+ Notes. (1) Number of exoplanet hosts in the cluster. (2) Pearson’s r value. (3) p-values of the linear model.
1500
+ Table 2. Regression coefficients of Eq. (18).
1501
+ Element
1502
+ N1
1503
+ a ± ∆a
1504
+ b ± ∆b
1505
+ c ± ∆c
1506
+ p2
1507
+ [M/H]
1508
+ 674
1509
+ −0.097 ± 0.012
1510
+ 0.198 ± 0.022
1511
+ 0.225 ± 0.021
1512
+ < 10−4
1513
+ [C/Fe]
1514
+ 674
1515
+ 0.020 ± 0.006
1516
+ −0.032 ± 0.010
1517
+ −0.062 ± 0.010
1518
+ 0.0001
1519
+ [C I/Fe]
1520
+ 673
1521
+ 0.027 ± 0.006
1522
+ −0.040 ± 0.011
1523
+ −0.082 ± 0.011
1524
+ < 10−4
1525
+ [N/Fe]
1526
+ 596
1527
+ 0.010 ± 0.015
1528
+ 0.111 ± 0.026
1529
+ 0.116 ± 0.026
1530
+ 0.0001
1531
+ [O/Fe]
1532
+ 673
1533
+ 0.023 ± 0.008
1534
+ 0.001 ± 0.015
1535
+ 0.040 ± 0.015
1536
+ 0.0164
1537
+ [Mg/Fe]
1538
+ 674
1539
+ 0.030 ± 0.006
1540
+ −0.031 ± 0.011
1541
+ −0.030 ± 0.011
1542
+ < 10−4
1543
+ [Al/Fe]
1544
+ 615
1545
+ 0.021 ± 0.008
1546
+ 0.001 ± 0.015
1547
+ 0.095 ± 0.015
1548
+ 0.0430
1549
+ [Si/Fe]
1550
+ 674
1551
+ 0.020 ± 0.005
1552
+ 0.016 ± 0.009
1553
+ 0.040 ± 0.009
1554
+ < 10−4
1555
+ [K/Fe]
1556
+ 673
1557
+ 0.026 ± 0.009
1558
+ −0.035 ± 0.016
1559
+ −0.022 ± 0.015
1560
+ 0.0025
1561
+ [Mn/Fe]
1562
+ 643
1563
+ −0.019 ± 0.006
1564
+ 0.030 ± 0.011
1565
+ 0.049 ± 0.011
1566
+ 0.0005
1567
+ Notes. (1) Sample size. (2) p-value of the biliniear model.
1568
+ tion due to the increased cooling related to the photoevaporation
1569
+ of such an atmosphere.
1570
+ In Lecavelier Des Etangs (2007), additional important fac-
1571
+ tors have been introduced to the formalism, such as atmospheric
1572
+ loss due to tidal forces and the effect of he inclination. These two
1573
+ factors together have an influence on the lifetime of an evapo-
1574
+ rating atmosphere, leading to the conclusion that in the case of
1575
+ higher inclination values, increased density is required to retain
1576
+ the atmosphere during a specified lifetime. This result suggests
1577
+ that stars with higher temperatures (which tend to host more
1578
+ planets on high inclinations, Winn et al. (2010); Albrecht et al.
1579
+ (2012); Winn & Fabrycky (2015); Zhou et al. (2019)) can host
1580
+ only gaseous planets with a higher average atmospheric den-
1581
+ sity for a longer time. This conclusion would at least partly ex-
1582
+ plain the dependence of the desert boundary on the stellar effec-
1583
+ tive temperature, and the general dependence of planetary occur-
1584
+ rence on metallicity.
1585
+ The most important result of our analysis is the detection
1586
+ of multiple relations between MP and RP on one side and Teff
1587
+ and MS on the other side. These detections reflect the struc-
1588
+ tural difference between large, atmosphere-dominated planets
1589
+ and the smaller Neptunes and super-Earths. These multiple re-
1590
+ lations complicate the picture at the desert boundary because it
1591
+ is precisely these two kinds of planets that meet there. There are
1592
+ different kind of planets at the upper boundary and the lower
1593
+ boundary, which can naturally lead to different mass and radius
1594
+ dependencies on the stellar parameters. However, in the case of
1595
+ the metallicity dependencies, the sign of the slope is also differ-
1596
+ ent and we see a negative correlation between RP and [M/H] for
1597
+ large planets, along with a positive correlation for small planets
1598
+ (Eqs. 6 and 8). Therefore, we consider such multiple relations as
1599
+ an evidence for different processes forming the upper and lower
1600
+ boundaries of the desert (while there are at least two different
1601
+ processes at the upper boundary itself, as well; confirming the
1602
+ results from Ionov et al. (2018)).
1603
+ A widely claimed scenario here is the high-eccentricity mi-
1604
+ gration (Owen & Lai 2018), as well as the tidal disruption of
1605
+ giant planets (Matsakos & Königl 2016) or an XUV photoe-
1606
+ vaporation affecting sub-Saturns (Hallatt & Lee 2022). Deciding
1607
+ which one is the dominant at the lower boundary of the desert re-
1608
+ quires detailed studies of individual planets. A possible detection
1609
+ of the “sculpted Saturns” scenario would corroborate the predic-
1610
+ tion of the possible surviving super low-density sub-Saturns to
1611
+ the present day if they are born with even larger atmospheres
1612
+ than they currently harbor – in particular, Kepler 223 d has been
1613
+ claimed to be an example for such a planet on a 14.79 d period
1614
+ orbit (Hallatt & Lee 2022).
1615
+ There are several other questions that we were not able to
1616
+ answer directly from the present data – the most important being
1617
+ how the evaporation processes and the claimed high-eccentricity
1618
+ migration processes actually form the sub-Jovian/Neptunian
1619
+ desert. Also, because we found that the desert boundaries de-
1620
+ pend on stellar parameters, the simple linear and log-linear laws
1621
+ that mark the boundary of the desert (Mazeh et al. 2016) are in
1622
+ some way transited to a multilinear dependence. Here, we find
1623
+ a lack of predictions about the desert boundary in the R-P and
1624
+ M-P planes as a function of stellar temperature and metallicity,
1625
+ for instance, and a comparison is not readily possible. Instead,
1626
+ our aim in the present analysis is to show that the formation of
1627
+ the desert is indeed a complex astrophysical process itself. Thus,
1628
+ presenting planetary evolution processes with respect to funda-
1629
+ mental stellar parameters should indeed be the next step toward
1630
+ improving our understanding of this process.
1631
+ Our current conclusions were based on the currently avail-
1632
+ able NASA Exoplanet catalog, combined with the SDSS-IV
1633
+ APOGEE-2 catalog of exoplanet host stars with a limited num-
1634
+ ber of entries (< 700 planets in case of all elements). In the fu-
1635
+ ture, an extended stellar catalog from the SDSS-V Milky Way
1636
+ Mapper (MWM, Kollmeier et al. 2017) program will cover a
1637
+ much larger sample of planet-host stars, and a similar analysis
1638
+ involving these data will reveal deeper details of these correla-
1639
+ tions.
1640
+ 5. Summary
1641
+ In this paper, we analyzed exoplanet occurrence with respect to
1642
+ stellar and planetary parameters. Our main results are as follows:
1643
+ – We demonstrated the multifaced nature of the upper bound-
1644
+ ary of the sub-Jovian or Neptunian desert: in the MP–P
1645
+ plane, the boundary is marked by inflated hot Jupiters; while
1646
+ in the RP–P plane, there are normal hot Jupiters at the bound-
1647
+ ary.
1648
+ – We confirmed the dependence of the period boundary on
1649
+ stellar parameters, such as effective temperature, stellar
1650
+ mass, and stellar radius.
1651
+ – The multiple populations and the parameter dependence of
1652
+ the boundary suggests multiple formation mechanisms.
1653
+ Article number, page 10 of 11
1654
+
1655
+ Gy. M. Szabó
1656
+ et al.: Sub-Jovian desert of exoplanets at its boundaries
1657
+ – With fuzzy clustering, we also investigated double param-
1658
+ eter relations between planet mass and radius on one side,
1659
+ and effective temperature, stellar mass, and metallicity on the
1660
+ other.
1661
+ – The demarcation of these planet groups coincides with the
1662
+ position of the desert, suggesting that all the relationships
1663
+ connecting the planetary size and the fundamental stellar pa-
1664
+ rameters conjoin at the level of the size ranges of the desert
1665
+ and play a role in its formation.
1666
+ – In light of these results, we considered photoevaporation as
1667
+ the main process shaping the desert boundaries. We have
1668
+ discussed other possibilities such as high-eccentricity migra-
1669
+ tion, abrasion by irradiation, tidal loss of atmosphere, and
1670
+ internal structural differences.
1671
+ Acknowledgements. We acknowledge the support of the Hungarian National
1672
+ Research, Development and Innovation Office (NKFIH) grant K-125015, a
1673
+ PRODEX Experiment Agreement No. 4000137122, the Lendület LP2018-
1674
+ 7/2022 grant of the Hungarian Academy of Science and the support of the city of
1675
+ Szombathely. LBo acknowledges the funding support from Italian Space Agency
1676
+ (ASI) regulated by “Accordo ASI-INAF n. 2013-016-R.0 del 9 luglio 2013 e
1677
+ integrazione del 9 luglio 2015”. Prepared with the professional support of the
1678
+ Doctoral Student Scholarship Program of the Co-operative Doctoral Program of
1679
+ the Ministry of Innovation and Technology financed from the National Research,
1680
+ Development and Innovation Fund.
1681
+ References
1682
+ Abdurro’uf, Accetta, K., Aerts, C., et al. 2022, ApJS, 259, 35
1683
+ Albrecht, S., Winn, J. N., Johnson, J. A., et al. 2012, ApJ, 757, 18
1684
+ Armstrong, D. J., Lopez, T. A., Adibekyan, V., et al. 2020, Nature, 583, 39
1685
+ Ataiee, S. & Kley, W. 2021, A&A, 648, A69
1686
+ Bailey, E. & Batygin, K. 2018, ApJ, 866, L2
1687
+ Benítez-Llambay, P., Masset, F., & Beaugé, C. 2011, A&A, 528, A2
1688
+ Bezdek, J. C. 1981, Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms.
1689
+ (Springer New York, NY)
1690
+ Blanton, M. R., Bershady, M. A., Abolfathi, B., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 28
1691
+ Colón, K. D., Morehead, R. C., & Ford, E. B. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 3001
1692
+ Demangeon, O. D. S., Faedi, F., Hébrard, G., et al. 2018, A&A, 610, A63
1693
+ Dong, S., Xie, J.-W., Zhou, J.-L., Zheng, Z., & Luo, A. 2018, Proceedings of the
1694
+ National Academy of Science, 115, 266
1695
+ dos Santos, L. A., Bourrier, V., Ehrenreich, D., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A40
1696
+ Dragomir, D., Crossfield, I. J. M., Benneke, B., et al. 2020, ApJ, 903, L6
1697
+ Eigmüller, P., Gandolfi, D., Persson, C. M., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, 130
1698
+ Emsenhuber, A., Mordasini, C., Burn, R., et al. 2021a, A&A, 656, A69
1699
+ Emsenhuber, A., Mordasini, C., Burn, R., et al. 2021b, A&A, 656, A70
1700
+ Feigelson, E. D. & Babu, G. J. 2012, Modern Statistical Methods for Astronomy:
1701
+ With R Applications (Cambridge University Press)
1702
+ Ferraro, M., Giordani, P., & Serafini, A. 2019, The R Journal, 11
1703
+ Fortney, J. J., Marley, M. S., & Barnes, J. W. 2007, ApJ, 659, 1661
1704
+ Giacalone, S., Matsakos, T., & Königl, A. 2017, AJ, 154, 192
1705
+ Gunn, J. E., Siegmund, W. A., Mannery, E. J., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 2332
1706
+ Hallatt, T. & Lee, E. J. 2022, ApJ, 924, 9
1707
+ Ionov, D. E., Pavlyuchenkov, Y. N., & Shematovich, V. I. 2018, MNRAS, 476,
1708
+ 5639
1709
+ Jenkins, J. S., Díaz, M. R., Kurtovic, N. T., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4,
1710
+ 1148
1711
+ Kollmeier, J. A., Zasowski, G., Rix, H.-W., et al. 2017, arXiv e-prints,
1712
+ arXiv:1711.03234
1713
+ Kurokawa, H. & Nakamoto, T. 2014, ApJ, 783, 54
1714
+ Lecavelier Des Etangs, A. 2007, A&A, 461, 1185
1715
+ Lin, D. N. C. & Papaloizou, J. 1986, ApJ, 309, 846
1716
+ Lopez, E. D. & Fortney, J. J. 2014, ApJ, 792, 1
1717
+ Lozovsky, M., Helled, R., Pascucci, I., et al. 2021, A&A, 652, A110
1718
+ Lundkvist, M. S., Kjeldsen, H., Albrecht, S., et al. 2016, Nature Communica-
1719
+ tions, 7, 11201
1720
+ Majewski, S. R., Schiavon, R. P., Frinchaboy, P. M., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 94
1721
+ Masset, F. S., Morbidelli, A., Crida, A., & Ferreira, J. 2006, ApJ, 642, 478
1722
+ Matsakos, T. & Königl, A. 2016, ApJ, 820, L8
1723
+ Mazeh, T., Holczer, T., & Faigler, S. 2016, A&A, 589, A75
1724
+ Mordasini, C., Alibert, Y., Georgy, C., et al. 2012, A&A, 547, A112
1725
+ Mordasini, C., Mollière, P., Dittkrist, K. M., Jin, S., & Alibert, Y. 2015, Interna-
1726
+ tional Journal of Astrobiology, 14, 201
1727
+ Mori, M., Livingston, J. H., Leon, J. d., et al. 2022, AJ, 163, 298
1728
+ Murgas, F., Astudillo-Defru, N., Bonfils, X., et al. 2021, A&A, 653, A60
1729
+ Owen, J. E. 2019, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 47, 67
1730
+ Owen, J. E. & Lai, D. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 5012
1731
+ Owen, J. E. & Murray-Clay, R. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 2206
1732
+ Owen, J. E. & Wu, Y. 2016, ApJ, 817, 107
1733
+ Persson, C. M., Georgieva, I. Y., Gandolfi, D., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A184
1734
+ Petigura, E. A., Marcy, G. W., Winn, J. N., et al. 2018, AJ, 155, 89
1735
+ Rauer, H., Catala, C., Aerts, C., et al. 2014, Experimental Astronomy, 38, 249
1736
+ Rozner, M., Glanz, H., Perets, H. B., & Grishin, E. 2022, ApJ, 931, 10
1737
+ Sanchis-Ojeda, R., Rappaport, S., Winn, J. N., et al. 2014, ApJ, 787, 47
1738
+ Sarkis, P., Mordasini, C., Henning, T., Marleau, G. D., & Mollière, P. 2021,
1739
+ A&A, 645, A79
1740
+ Schlichting, H. E. & Mukhopadhyay, S. 2018, Space Sci. Rev., 214, 34
1741
+ Schlichting, H. E., Sari, R., & Yalinewich, A. 2015, Icarus, 247, 81
1742
+ Scott, E. R. D. & Sanders, I. S. 2009, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 73, 5137
1743
+ Szabó, G. M. & Kálmán, S. 2019, MNRAS, 485, L116
1744
+ Szabó, G. M. & Kiss, L. L. 2011, ApJ, 727, L44
1745
+ Taylor, M. B. 2005, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Se-
1746
+ ries, Vol. 347, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIV, ed.
1747
+ P. Shopbell, M. Britton, & R. Ebert, 29
1748
+ Thorngren, D. P. & Fortney, J. J. 2018, AJ, 155, 214
1749
+ Tinetti,
1750
+ G.,
1751
+ Eccleston,
1752
+ P.,
1753
+ Haswell,
1754
+ C.,
1755
+ et
1756
+ al.
1757
+ 2021,
1758
+ arXiv
1759
+ e-prints,
1760
+ arXiv:2104.04824
1761
+ Traub, W. A. 2011, in AAS/Division for Extreme Solar Systems Abstracts,
1762
+ Vol. 2, AAS/Division for Extreme Solar Systems Abstracts, 24.03
1763
+ Wilson, J. C., Hearty, F. R., Skrutskie, M. F., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 055001
1764
+ Winn, J. N., Fabrycky, D., Albrecht, S., & Johnson, J. A. 2010, ApJ, 718, L145
1765
+ Winn, J. N. & Fabrycky, D. C. 2015, ARA&A, 53, 409
1766
+ Wu, Y. 2019, ApJ, 874, 91
1767
+ Zasowski, G., Cohen, R. E., Chojnowski, S. D., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 198
1768
+ Zhou, G., Huang, C. X., Bakos, G. Á., et al. 2019, AJ, 158, 141
1769
+ Article number, page 11 of 11
1770
+
1771
+ ID
PdAzT4oBgHgl3EQfIvsJ/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
XdE1T4oBgHgl3EQfbwSy/content/tmp_files/2301.03177v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1908 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ arXiv:2301.03177v1 [math.AC] 9 Jan 2023
2
+ A FAMILY OF EXPLICIT WARING DECOMPOSITIONS OF A POLYNOMIAL
3
+ KANGJIN HAN AND HYUNSUK MOON
4
+ Abstract. In this paper we settle some polynomial identity which provides a family of explicit
5
+ Waring decompositions of any monomial Xa0
6
+ 0 Xa1
7
+ 1 · · · Xan
8
+ n
9
+ over a field k. This gives an upper bound
10
+ for the Waring rank of a given monomial and naturally leads to an explicit Waring decomposition of
11
+ any homogeneous form and, eventually, of any polynomial via (de)homogenization. Note that such
12
+ decomposition is very useful in many applications dealing with polynomial computations, symmetric
13
+ tensor problems and so on. We discuss some computational aspect of our result as comparing with
14
+ other known methods and also present a computer implementation for potential use in the end.
15
+ 1. Introduction
16
+ Throughout the paper, let k be an infinite field and R = k[X0, . . . , Xn] = �
17
+ d≥0 Rd be the ring of
18
+ polynomials over k and Rd be the k-vector space of homogeneous polynomials (or forms) of degree
19
+ d. For a given F ∈ Rd, a Waring decomposition of F over k is defined as a sum
20
+ (1)
21
+ F =
22
+ r
23
+
24
+ i=1
25
+ λiLd
26
+ i ,
27
+ where λi ∈ k and Li is a linear form over k. The smallest number r for which such a decomposition
28
+ exists is called Waring rank of F over k and we denote it by rankk(F).
29
+ Earlier studies of Waring decomposition and Waring rank, initiated by works of Sylvester and
30
+ others, go back to the 19th century (see [9] for a historical background). But, despite their long
31
+ history, the Waring ranks for general forms over the complex numbers, a long-standing conjecture
32
+ in this field, were determined only in the 1990s by [1] and the complex Waring rank of monomials,
33
+ a specific type of polynomial, has been found in recently [3, 5].
34
+ Generally, it turns out that
35
+ determination of the rank of a form is a very difficult task except some known cases (see e.g. [7]
36
+ and references therein).
37
+ Over the real numbers the Waring rank is even more difficult to compute in general. For some
38
+ basic cases, the real Waring rank of a monomial Xa0
39
+ 0 Xa1
40
+ 1 · · · Xan
41
+ n
42
+ with ai > 0 is known; it is the
43
+ degree when n = 1 [4] and 1
44
+ 2
45
+ �n
46
+ i=0(ai + 1) when min(ai) = 1 [6]. In [6], they also provide an upper
47
+ bound for the real rank of any monomial
48
+ 1
49
+ 2aj
50
+ �n
51
+ i=0(ai + aj) where aj is min(ai), but it is not tight
52
+ in general. The state of art result has been obtained recently by authors in [8] as follows:
53
+ Theorem 1.1 ([8]). For a monomial Xa0
54
+ 0 Xa1
55
+ 1 . . . Xan
56
+ n
57
+ with each ai > 0, it holds that
58
+ (2)
59
+ rankR(Xa0
60
+ 0 Xa1
61
+ 1 . . . Xan
62
+ n ) ≤ 1
63
+ 2
64
+ � n
65
+
66
+ i=0
67
+ (ai + 1) −
68
+ n
69
+
70
+ i=0
71
+ (ai − 1)
72
+
73
+ .
74
+ Further, the same result is true for rankQ(Xa0
75
+ 0 Xa1
76
+ 1 . . . Xan
77
+ n ).
78
+ In this article we settle some identity which concerns an explicit Waring decompositions of any
79
+ monomial. This can be used to recover the bound (2) in a direct way. In principle, via ‘apolarity’
80
+ one could find an Waring decomposition of a given monomial M over R or Q using the sub-ideal of
81
+ 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 14P99, 12D05, 13P10, 14A25, 15A21, 14N15.
82
+ Key words and phrases. Waring rank, Waring decomposition, Monomials, Symmetric tensor, Complexity.
83
+ 1
84
+
85
+ the apolar ideal M⊥ which appeared in [8]. But, in general this involves such a huge amount of linear
86
+ algebra computation of a large size system to determine whole coefficients of the decomposition
87
+ that it is not easy to get the result actually in many cases.
88
+ Here we prove some Waring-type identity which is parametrized by most numbers in the (infinite)
89
+ base field k and has an interesting combinatorial nature (see Theorem 2.4 and Corollary 2.5). As
90
+ a result, we can have a more direct formula for a Waring decomposition of M without relying on
91
+ a massive linear algebra calculation.
92
+ We discuss some consequence of the identities in Section 2 for finding an explicit Waring decom-
93
+ position of not only a monomial, but also of any homogeneous form (to an arbitrary polynomial it
94
+ can be easily applied via the process of (de)homogenization, too). Especially, in Section 3 we con-
95
+ sider its computational aspect; it turns out that our method is asymptotically better in the number
96
+ of summands than the method in [2] using a previously known decomposition (see Remark 3.3 for
97
+ further discussion). We also present an example of the identity in Example 2.8 and a software
98
+ implementation using a symbolic computer algebra system Macaulay2 [10] as well in Section 4.
99
+ Finally, we’d like to mention that almost everything in the paper also does work over a finite
100
+ field provided that the characteristic is relatively large. But, for brevity we here focus only on the
101
+ case of an infinite field k.
102
+ 2. Main Result
103
+ Definitions and Notations 2.1. First of all we define some notions and set notations on them.
104
+ (1) Let a ∈ Zn+1
105
+ ≥0
106
+ be a sequence of n + 1 nonnegative integers (note that such an a naturally
107
+ corresponds to a monomial Xa0
108
+ 0 Xa1
109
+ 1 · · · Xan
110
+ n
111
+ ∈ k[X0, . . . , Xn]). |a| means its sum �n
112
+ 0 ai and
113
+ �|a|
114
+ a
115
+
116
+ denotes the multinomial coefficient
117
+
118
+ |a|
119
+ a0,a1,...,an
120
+
121
+ .
122
+ (2) For a given a ∈ Zn+1
123
+ ≥0 , we set Za := {i | ai = 0}, the set of indices of zeros, Ea :=
124
+ {i | ai is even}, the set of even indices and mi = ⌊ai−1
125
+ 2 ⌋ for i = 0, . . . , n.
126
+ (3) Fix a ∈ Zn+1
127
+ ≥0 . For any set A with Za ⊂ A ⊂ Ea, we consider a set of ordered multiples
128
+ KA := {(ki)i̸∈A | ki ∈ Z, 0 ≤ ki ≤ mi for i ̸∈ A} and SA := {(si)i̸∈A | si ∈ {0, 1}} which
129
+ is the set of all ordered multiples for signs. As a reduction of each set, we also define two
130
+ specific subsets
131
+ KA := {(ki)i̸∈A | ki ∈ Z, 0 ≤ ki ≤ mi for i ̸∈ A and min{ki}i̸∈A = 0} ⊂ KA ,
132
+ SA := {(si)i̸∈A | si ∈ {0, 1}, smin{i:i̸∈A} = 0} ⊂ SA .
133
+ (4) For a given triple (A, k, s) where A is a set such that Za ⊂ A ⊂ Ea, k ∈ KA and s ∈ SA,
134
+ we set ℓA,k,s :=
135
+
136
+ i̸∈A
137
+ (−1)sitkiXi, a linear form in k[X0, X1, . . . , Xn].
138
+ (5) Finally, we need to define the following combinatorial function depending on the value of
139
+ ai;
140
+ Fi(y) :=
141
+
142
+
143
+
144
+
145
+
146
+ mi
147
+
148
+ j=1
149
+ (y − tai−2j)
150
+ , for mi > 0
151
+ 1
152
+ , if mi = −1 or 0
153
+ .
154
+ Then Fi(y) is a polynomial function in k[y] and has degree mi unless mi = −1. For a
155
+ monomial M and a polynomial f in k[y], we denotes the coefficient of M in the polynomial
156
+ f by c(M, f).
157
+ For the proof of Theorem 2.4, we also prove a lemma on the sum of signs.
158
+ 2
159
+
160
+ Lemma 2.2. For a sequence of integers J ∈ Zk,
161
+
162
+ I∈{0,1}k
163
+ (−1)
164
+ �k
165
+ i=1 Ji·Ii =
166
+ k
167
+
168
+ i=1
169
+ (1 + (−1)Ji) =
170
+
171
+ 2k, if all the Ji are even
172
+ 0, if at least one of Ji is odd
173
+ ,
174
+ where {0, 1}k denotes the set of all sequences of k numbers whose entry is 0 or 1.
175
+ Proof.
176
+
177
+ I∈{0,1}k
178
+ (−1)
179
+ �k
180
+ i=1 Ji·Ii =
181
+
182
+ I∈{0,1}k
183
+ k
184
+
185
+ i=1
186
+ (−1)Ji·Ii
187
+ =
188
+
189
+ 0≤I1≤1
190
+
191
+ 0≤I2≤1
192
+ · · ·
193
+
194
+ 0≤Ik≤1
195
+ (−1)J1·I1(−1)J2·I2 · · · (−1)Jk·Ik
196
+ =
197
+
198
+ 0≤I1≤1
199
+ (−1)J1·I1 · · ·
200
+
201
+ 0≤Ik≤1
202
+ (−1)Jk·Ik
203
+ =
204
+ k
205
+
206
+ i=1
207
+
208
+ 0≤Ik≤1
209
+ (−1)Ji·Ii =
210
+ k
211
+
212
+ i=1
213
+ (1 + (−1)Ji)
214
+
215
+ Here is a small example of the equality of Lemma 2.2.
216
+ Example 2.3. Let J = (3, 4, 5). Then k = 3 and the set {0, 1}3 is
217
+ {(0, 0, 0), (0, 0, 1), (0, 1, 0), (0, 1, 1), (1, 0, 0), (1, 0, 1), (1, 1, 0), (1, 1, 1)}.
218
+ For each I ∈ {0, 1}3, �3
219
+ i=1 Ii · Ji = I1J1 + I2J2 + I3J3 is given as
220
+ 0, 5, 4, 9, 3, 8, 7, and 12 .
221
+ Hence, in one side we have
222
+
223
+ I∈{0,1}3
224
+ (−1)
225
+ �3
226
+ i=1 Ii·Ji = (−1)0 + (−1)5 + (−1)4 + (−1)9 + (−1)3 + (−1)8 + (−1)7 + (−1)12
227
+ = 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + 1 = 0
228
+ and in the other side
229
+ k
230
+
231
+ i=1
232
+ (1 + (−1)Ji) = (1 + (−1)3)(1 + (−1)4)(1 + (−1)5) = 0 .
233
+ Now we prove our main theorem.
234
+ Theorem 2.4. Let a ∈ Zn+1
235
+ ≥0
236
+ be a sequence of n + 1 nonnegative integers with d = |a|. Then, it
237
+ holds that
238
+ (3)
239
+ Da · Xa0
240
+ 0 Xa1
241
+ 1 · · · Xan
242
+ n
243
+ =
244
+
245
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea
246
+
247
+ (k,s)∈KA×SA
248
+ CA,k,s(ℓA,k,s)d
249
+ where
250
+ Da = (−1)|Za| · 2n ·
251
+ �d
252
+ a
253
+
254
+ ·
255
+
256
+ i̸∈Za
257
+ Fi(tai)
258
+ and
259
+ CA,k,s = (−1)|A| · 2|A| · (−1)
260
+
261
+ i̸∈A ai·si �
262
+ i∈A
263
+ Fi(1)
264
+
265
+ i̸∈A
266
+ c(yki, Fi)
267
+ 3
268
+
269
+ Proof.
270
+ (ℓA,k,s)d =
271
+ � �
272
+ i̸∈A
273
+ (−1)sitkiXi
274
+ �d =
275
+
276
+ |b|=d,A⊂Zb
277
+ �d
278
+ b
279
+ � �
280
+ i̸∈A
281
+ (−1)si·bi(tki)biXbi
282
+ i .
283
+ Rewrite the right hand side of the equation as the coefficient and monomial with degree d as follows
284
+
285
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea
286
+
287
+ (k,s)∈KA×SA
288
+ CA,k,s
289
+
290
+
291
+ |b|=d,A⊂Zb
292
+ �d
293
+ b
294
+ � �
295
+ i̸∈A
296
+ (−1)si·bi(tki)biXbi
297
+ i
298
+
299
+ =
300
+
301
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea
302
+
303
+ |b|=d,A⊂Zb
304
+ �d
305
+ b
306
+ � �
307
+ i̸∈A
308
+ Xbi
309
+ i
310
+
311
+ (k,s)∈KA×SA
312
+ CA,k,s
313
+ � �
314
+ i̸∈A
315
+ (−1)si·bi(tki)bi
316
+
317
+ =
318
+
319
+ |b|=d
320
+ �d
321
+ b
322
+ � n
323
+
324
+ i=0
325
+ Xbi
326
+ i
327
+
328
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea,A⊂Zb
329
+
330
+ (k,s)∈KA×SA
331
+ CA,k,s
332
+ � �
333
+ i̸∈A
334
+ (−1)si·bi(tki)bi
335
+
336
+ Let
337
+ Tb =
338
+
339
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea,A⊂Zb
340
+
341
+ (k,s)∈KA×SA
342
+ CA,k,s
343
+ � �
344
+ i̸∈A
345
+ (−1)si·bi(tki)bi
346
+
347
+ then
348
+
349
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea
350
+
351
+ (k,s)∈KA×SA
352
+ CA,k,s(ℓA,k,s)d =
353
+
354
+ |b|=d
355
+ �d
356
+ b
357
+
358
+ · Tb · Xb0
359
+ 0 Xb1
360
+ 1 · · · Xbn
361
+ n
362
+ We want to show that all Tb = 0 except b ̸= a and
363
+ �d
364
+ a
365
+
366
+ Ta = Da.
367
+ Step 1
368
+ Since all the linear forms ℓA,k,s do not have variables Xi with i ∈ Za, Tb = 0 for any b with
369
+ Za ̸⊂ Zb. Hence we can assume that Za ⊂ Zb. So we can reduce
370
+ Tb =
371
+
372
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea∩Zb
373
+
374
+ (k,s)∈KA×SA
375
+ CA,k,s
376
+
377
+ (−1)
378
+
379
+ i̸∈A si·bi �
380
+ i̸∈A
381
+ (tki)bi
382
+
383
+ Step 2
384
+ Tb =
385
+
386
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea∩Zb
387
+
388
+ k∈KA
389
+
390
+ s∈SA
391
+
392
+ (−1)|A| · 2|A| · (−1)
393
+
394
+ i̸∈A ai·si ·
395
+
396
+ i∈A
397
+ Fi(1)
398
+
399
+ i̸∈A
400
+ c(yki, Fi)
401
+ · (−1)
402
+
403
+ i̸∈A bi·si �
404
+ i̸∈A
405
+ (tki)bi
406
+
407
+ =
408
+
409
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea∩Zb
410
+ (−1)|A| · 2|A| ·
411
+
412
+ i∈A
413
+ Fi(1)·
414
+ � �
415
+ k∈KA
416
+
417
+ i̸∈A
418
+ c(yki, Fi)
419
+
420
+ i̸∈A
421
+ (tki)bi
422
+ ·
423
+
424
+ s∈SA
425
+ (−1)
426
+
427
+ i̸∈A ai·si(−1)
428
+
429
+ i̸∈A bi·si
430
+
431
+ By Lemma 2.2,
432
+
433
+ s∈SA
434
+ (−1)
435
+
436
+ i̸∈A ai·si(−1)
437
+
438
+ i̸∈A bi·si =
439
+
440
+ s∈SA
441
+ (−1)
442
+
443
+ i̸∈A(ai+bi)·si =
444
+
445
+
446
+
447
+
448
+
449
+ 2n−|A|,
450
+ ai + bi ≡ 0(mod 2) for all
451
+ i ̸∈ A, i ̸= min{i : i ̸∈ A}
452
+ 0,
453
+ otherwise
454
+ 4
455
+
456
+ since smin{i̸∈A} = 0. Let δ be the map from Z2 to {0, 1} such that δ(x, y) =
457
+
458
+ 1, if x ≡ y(mod2)
459
+ 0, if x ̸≡ y(mod2)
460
+ .
461
+ Then
462
+
463
+ s∈SA
464
+ (−1)
465
+
466
+ i̸∈A ai·si(−1)
467
+
468
+ i̸∈A bi·si = 2n−|A|
469
+
470
+ i̸∈A,i̸=min{i:i̸∈A}
471
+ δ(ai, bi)
472
+ For i ∈ A ⊂ Ea ∩ Za, ai and bi are both even. Hence d = �n
473
+ i=0 ai = �n
474
+ i=0 bi implies �
475
+ i̸∈A ai ≡
476
+
477
+ i̸∈A bi. So if ai and bi have same parity for all i ̸∈ A, i ̸= min{i : i ̸∈ A}, then amin{i:i̸∈A} and
478
+ bmin{i:i̸∈A} also have same parity. It means that
479
+
480
+ i̸∈A,i̸=min{i:i̸∈A}
481
+ δ(ai, bi) =
482
+
483
+ i̸∈A
484
+ δ(ai, bi)
485
+ Since 2|A| · 2n−|A| = 2n do not relate to any summation and �
486
+ i̸∈A δ(ai, bi) is only depend on the
487
+ choice of A,
488
+ Tb = 2n ·
489
+
490
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea∩Zb
491
+ (−1)|A| �
492
+ i∈A
493
+ Fi(1)
494
+
495
+ i̸∈A
496
+ δ(ai, bi)
497
+ � �
498
+ k∈KA
499
+
500
+ i̸∈A
501
+ c(yki, Fi)
502
+
503
+ i̸∈A
504
+ (tki)bi
505
+
506
+ Step 3 Let {0, . . . , n}\A = {i1, i2, . . . , ip} where p = n + 1 − |A|. Then
507
+
508
+ k∈KA
509
+
510
+ i̸∈A
511
+ c(yki, Fi)
512
+
513
+ i̸∈A
514
+ (tki)bi
515
+ =
516
+
517
+ 0≤ki1≤mi1
518
+
519
+ 0≤ki2≤mi2
520
+ · · ·
521
+
522
+ 0≤kip≤mip
523
+ p
524
+
525
+ j=1
526
+ c(ykij , Fij)(tkij )bij
527
+ =
528
+
529
+ 0≤ki1≤mi1
530
+ c(yki1, Fi1)(tki1)bi1 · · ·
531
+
532
+ 0≤kip≤mip
533
+ c(ykip, Fip)(tkip)bip
534
+ =
535
+ p
536
+
537
+ j=1
538
+
539
+ 0≤kij ≤mij
540
+ c(ykij , Fij)(tkij )bij =
541
+
542
+ i̸∈A
543
+
544
+ 0≤ki≤mi
545
+ c(yki, Fi)(tki)bi
546
+ =
547
+
548
+ i̸∈A
549
+
550
+ 0≤ki≤mi
551
+ c(yki, Fi)(tbi)ki
552
+ Since each Fi has degree mi for i ̸∈ A, �
553
+ 0≤ki≤mi c(yki, Fi)(tbi)ki = Fi(tbi). Hence
554
+ Tb = 2n ·
555
+
556
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea∩Zb
557
+ (−1)|A| �
558
+ i∈A
559
+ Fi(1)
560
+
561
+ i̸∈A
562
+ Fi(tbi)
563
+
564
+ i̸∈A
565
+ δ(ai, bi)
566
+ Step 4
567
+ Since Fi(tbi) = Fi(1) for i ∈ Ea ∩ Zb,
568
+
569
+ i∈A
570
+ Fi(1)
571
+
572
+ i̸∈A
573
+ Fi(tbi) =
574
+
575
+ i∈Ea∩Zb
576
+ Fi(1)
577
+
578
+ i̸∈Ea∩Zb
579
+ Fi(tbi).
580
+ Also, since ai and bi are all even for i ∈ Ea ∩ Zb, �
581
+ i̸∈A δ(ai, bi) = �
582
+ i̸∈Ea∩Zb δ(ai, bi). So the only
583
+ remaining term which is depended on the choice of A is (−1)|A|.
584
+ Tb = 2n ·
585
+
586
+ i∈Ea∩Zb
587
+ Fi(1)
588
+
589
+ i̸∈Ea∩Zb
590
+ Fi(tbi)
591
+
592
+ i̸∈Ea∩Zb
593
+ δ(ai, bi)
594
+
595
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea∩Zb
596
+ (−1)|A|
597
+ Step 5
598
+ 5
599
+
600
+ If Za ̸= Ea ∩ Zb, then �
601
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea∩Zb(−1)|A| = (−1)|Za|(1 − 1)|Ea∩Zb\Za| = 0. It means that
602
+ Tb = 0 when Za ̸= Ea ∩ Zb.
603
+ We can assume that Za = Ea ∩ Zb. Since �
604
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea∩Zb(−1)|A| = (−1)|Za|,
605
+ Tb = (−1)|Za| · 2n ·
606
+
607
+ i̸∈Za
608
+ Fi(tbi)
609
+
610
+ i̸∈Za
611
+ δ(ai, bi)
612
+ For some i ̸∈ Za, if ai and bi do not have same parity, δ(ai, bi) = 0 and it implies that Tb = 0.
613
+ Now we can assume that ai ≡ bi (mod 2) for all i ̸∈ Za. Suppose that there exist an index i such
614
+ that ai ̸= 0 and bi = 0. Since ai and bi have the same parity, ai is even. It means that i ∈ Ea and
615
+ i ∈ Zb. But i ∈ Ea ∩ Zb = Za contradicts to the supposition. It means that Za = Zb.
616
+ If ai = 1, then bi ̸= 0 and so bi ≥ ai. If ai = 2, then bi ̸= 0 and bi ≡ 0 (mod 2). So bi ≥ 2 = ai.
617
+ Suppose that ai > 2 and bi < ai for some i ̸∈ Za. Then bi = ai − 2j for some 1 ≤ j ≤ mi = ⌊ai−1
618
+ 2 ⌋
619
+ since ai and bi have same parity and 0 < bi < ai. It implies that Fi(tbi) = �mi
620
+ j=1(tbi − tai−2j) = 0
621
+ for some i ̸∈ Za. Hence
622
+ Tb = (−1)|Za| · 2n ·
623
+
624
+ i̸∈Za
625
+ Fi(tbi) = 0
626
+ So nonzero Tb occurs only when bi ≥ ai for all i ̸∈ Za. Since the total degree �n
627
+ i=0 bi = �n
628
+ i=0 ai =
629
+ d are same, the only nonzero Tb occurs when bi = ai for all i.
630
+ In conclusion,
631
+ Da =
632
+ �d
633
+ a
634
+
635
+ · Ta =
636
+ �d
637
+ a
638
+
639
+ · (−1)|Za| · 2n ·
640
+
641
+ i̸∈Za
642
+ Fi(tai)
643
+
644
+ How many do linear forms appear in the decomposition using (3)?
645
+ If Ea ̸= {0, . . . , n}, the
646
+ number of linear forms in Theorem 2.4 is given by
647
+
648
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea
649
+ |KA||SA| =
650
+
651
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea
652
+ 2n−|A| �
653
+ i̸∈A
654
+ (mi + 1) = 1
655
+ 2
656
+
657
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea
658
+
659
+ i̸∈A
660
+ 2(mi + 1)
661
+ = 1
662
+ 2
663
+
664
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea
665
+
666
+ i̸∈Ea
667
+ (ai + 1)
668
+
669
+ i̸∈A,i∈Ea
670
+ (ai) = 1
671
+ 2
672
+
673
+ i̸∈Ea
674
+ (ai + 1)
675
+
676
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea
677
+
678
+ i̸∈A,i∈Ea
679
+ (ai)
680
+ = 1
681
+ 2
682
+
683
+ i̸∈Ea
684
+ (ai + 1)
685
+
686
+ i∈Ea\Za
687
+ (ai + 1) = 1
688
+ 2
689
+
690
+ i̸∈Za
691
+ (ai + 1).
692
+ In case of Ea = {0, . . . , n} (i.e. all the elements ai are even), the choice A = {0, . . . , n} should
693
+ not be counted since there is no related linear form. Hence the toal number of linear forms can be
694
+ computed as
695
+ 1
696
+ 2
697
+
698
+ Za⊂A̸⊂{0,...,n}
699
+
700
+ i̸∈A
701
+ (ai) = 1
702
+ 2(
703
+
704
+ i̸∈Za
705
+ (ai + 1) − 1) · · · (∗).
706
+ Since, in the argument above we do not consider the parallel shift of the entries in the set KA due
707
+ to non-zero scaling of corresponding linear forms, the number (∗) is larger than the upper bound
708
+ given in the paper [8]. To remedy this, instead of KA we need to choose ki’s from
709
+ KA = {(ki)i̸∈A | ki ∈ Z, 0 ≤ ki ≤ mi for i ̸∈ A, min{ki}i̸∈A = 0} ,
710
+ which is a set of representatives of each class under the shift. Then, based on Theorem 2.4, we can
711
+ obtain a more optimized (i.e number of linear forms reduced as much as possible) result as follows.
712
+ 6
713
+
714
+ Corollary 2.5. Let a ∈ Zn+1
715
+ ≥0
716
+ be a sequence of n + 1 nonnegative integers with |a| = d. Then, we
717
+ have
718
+ (4)
719
+ Da · Xa0
720
+ 0 Xa1
721
+ 1 · · · Xan
722
+ n
723
+ =
724
+ ���
725
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea
726
+
727
+ k∈KA
728
+
729
+ s∈SA
730
+ CA,k,s(ℓA,k,s)d
731
+ where
732
+ Da = (−1)|Za| · 2n ·
733
+ �d
734
+ a
735
+
736
+ ·
737
+
738
+ i̸∈Za
739
+ Fi(tai)
740
+ and
741
+ CA,k,s =
742
+ min{mi−ki}i̸∈A
743
+
744
+ j=0
745
+ td·jCA,k+j·1,s .
746
+ Proof. By Theorem 2.4,
747
+ Da · Xa0
748
+ 0 Xa1
749
+ 1 · · · Xan
750
+ n
751
+ =
752
+
753
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea
754
+
755
+ g∈KA
756
+
757
+ s∈SA
758
+ CA,g,s(ℓA,g,s)d.
759
+ For a set (A, g, s) with Za ⊂ A ⊂ Ea, g ∈ KA, s ∈ SA, let m = min{gi}i̸∈A. Then
760
+ ℓA,g,s =
761
+
762
+ i̸∈A
763
+ (−1)sitgiXi = tm� �
764
+ i̸∈A
765
+ (−1)sitgi−mXi
766
+
767
+ = tmℓA,h,s
768
+ where h = (gi − m)i̸∈A. Since min{hi}i̸∈A = min{gi} − min{gi} = 0, h ∈ KA. Hence
769
+
770
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea
771
+
772
+ g∈KA
773
+
774
+ s∈SA
775
+ CA,g,s(ℓA,g,s)d
776
+ =
777
+
778
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea
779
+
780
+ h∈KA
781
+
782
+ s∈SA
783
+
784
+ g∈KA,
785
+ g−min{gi}·1=h
786
+ CA,g,s(tmin{gi} · ℓA,h,s)d,
787
+ and
788
+ (5)
789
+
790
+ g∈KA,
791
+ g−min{gi}·1=h
792
+ CA,g,s · tmin{gi}·d =
793
+
794
+ h+m·1∈KA
795
+ CA,h+m·1,s · tm·d .
796
+ Since h + m · 1 ∈ KA if and only if 0 ≤ hi + m ≤ mi for i ̸∈ A,
797
+ 0 = max{−hi}i̸∈A ≤ m ≤ min{mi − hi}i̸∈A .
798
+ Now the summation (5) becomes
799
+ min{mi−hi}i̸∈A
800
+
801
+ m=0
802
+ CA,h+m·1,s · tm·d =: CA,h,s .
803
+
804
+ Remark 2.6 (Waring rank and decomposition of a monomial over any infinite field k). We would
805
+ like to remark that the Waring type identity in Corollary 2.5 gives an upper bound for the Waring
806
+ rank as
807
+ (6)
808
+ rankk(M) ≤ 1
809
+ 2(
810
+ n
811
+
812
+ i=0
813
+ (ai + 1) −
814
+ n
815
+
816
+ i=0
817
+ (ai − 1)) .
818
+ 7
819
+
820
+ for any monomial M = Xa0
821
+ 0 Xa1
822
+ 1 . . . Xan
823
+ n
824
+ with a0 ≥ a1 ≥ · · · ≥ an > 0 over an infinite field k in
825
+ more direct way than in [8]; i.e. just by counting linear forms in the given explicit decomposition.
826
+ It’s because the total number of linear forms appearing in (4) is counted by
827
+
828
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea
829
+ |KA||SA| =
830
+
831
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea
832
+ � �
833
+ i̸∈A
834
+ (mi + 1) −
835
+
836
+ i̸∈A
837
+ (mi)
838
+
839
+ · 2n−|A|
840
+ = 1
841
+ 2
842
+
843
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea
844
+ � �
845
+ i̸∈A
846
+ 2(mi + 1) −
847
+
848
+ i̸∈A
849
+ 2(mi)
850
+
851
+ = 1
852
+ 2
853
+
854
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea
855
+ � �
856
+ i̸∈Ea
857
+ (ai + 1)
858
+
859
+ i∈Ea\A
860
+ (ai) −
861
+
862
+ i̸∈Ea
863
+ (ai − 1)
864
+
865
+ i∈Ea\A
866
+ (ai − 2)
867
+
868
+ = 1
869
+ 2
870
+
871
+ i̸∈Ea
872
+ (ai + 1)
873
+
874
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea
875
+
876
+ i∈Ea\A
877
+ (ai) − 1
878
+ 2
879
+
880
+ i̸∈Ea
881
+ (ai − 1)
882
+
883
+ Za⊂A⊂Ea
884
+
885
+ i∈Ea\A
886
+ (ai − 2)
887
+ = 1
888
+ 2
889
+
890
+ i̸∈Ea
891
+ (ai + 1)
892
+
893
+ i∈Ea\Za
894
+ (ai + 1) − 1
895
+ 2
896
+
897
+ i̸∈Ea
898
+ (ai − 1)
899
+
900
+ i∈Ea\Za
901
+ (ai − 1)
902
+ = 1
903
+ 2
904
+ � �
905
+ i̸∈Za
906
+ (ai + 1) −
907
+
908
+ i̸∈Za
909
+ (ai − 1)
910
+
911
+ ,
912
+ which is the same number as in the upper bound (6).
913
+ Remark 2.7 (Linear forms ℓA,k,s’s via Apolarity). The choice for our linear forms ℓA,k,s’s in this
914
+ paper is originated from the apolarity using the ideal Ja(t) ⊂ (xa0+1
915
+ 0
916
+ , . . . , xan+1
917
+ n
918
+ ), which is first
919
+ introduced in [8]. Each point of the zero set V (Ja(t)) in the projective n-space over k decides
920
+ exactly a linear form ℓA,k,s in the present paper up to non-zero scaling.
921
+ Example 2.8 (Case of X4
922
+ 0X3
923
+ 1X2
924
+ 2). Let a = {4, 3, 2}. Then Za = ∅, Ea = {0, 2} and m0 = 1, m1 =
925
+ 1, m2 = 0. There are four cases A ⊂ {0, 2} where A = ∅, {0}, {2}, {0, 2} and for each i we have
926
+ F0 = (y − t2),
927
+ F1 = (y − t),
928
+ F2 = 1 .
929
+ (1) A = ∅. Then, we get
930
+ KA = KA = {(k0, k1, k2) | 0 ≤ k0 ≤ 1, 0 ≤ k1 ≤ 1, 0 ≤ k2 ≤ 0}
931
+ = {(0, 0, 0), (0, 1, 0), (0, 0, 1), (0, 1, 1)}
932
+ SA = {(0, 0, 0), (0, 0, 1), (0, 1, 0), (0, 1, 1)}.
933
+ The linear forms and coefficients indexed by (k, s) ∈ KA × SA is given by the following
934
+ tables
935
+ ℓ∅,k,s =
936
+ s = 000
937
+ 001
938
+ 010
939
+ 011
940
+ k = 000
941
+ X0 + X1 + X2
942
+ X0 + X1 − X2
943
+ X0 − X1 + X2
944
+ X0 − X1 − X2
945
+ 010
946
+ X0 + tX1 + X2
947
+ X0 + tX1 − X2
948
+ X0 − tX1 + X2
949
+ X0 − tX1 − X2
950
+ 001
951
+ X0 + X1 + tX2
952
+ X0 + X1 − tX2
953
+ X0 − X1 + tX2
954
+ X0 − X1 − tX2
955
+ 011
956
+ X0 + tX1 + tX2
957
+ X0 + tX1 − tX2
958
+ X0 − tX1 + tX2
959
+ X0 − tX1 − tX2
960
+ C∅,k,s = (−1)0 · 20 · 1·
961
+ s = 000
962
+ 001
963
+ 010
964
+ 011
965
+ k = 000
966
+ t3
967
+ t3
968
+ −t3
969
+ −t3
970
+ 010
971
+ −t2
972
+ −t2
973
+ t2
974
+ t2
975
+ 001
976
+ −t
977
+ −t
978
+ t
979
+ t
980
+ 011
981
+ 1
982
+ 1
983
+ −1
984
+ −1
985
+ 8
986
+
987
+ (2) A = {0} Then
988
+ KA = KA = {(k1, k2) | 0 ≤ k1 ≤ 1, 0 ≤ k2 ≤ 0}
989
+ = {(0, 0), (1, 0)}
990
+ SA = {(0, 0), (0, 1)}.
991
+ The linear forms and coefficients defined by (k, s) ∈ KA×SA is given by the following tables
992
+ ℓ{0},k,s =
993
+ -
994
+ s = 00
995
+ 01
996
+ k = 00
997
+ X1 + X2
998
+ X1 − X2
999
+ 10
1000
+ tX1 + X2
1001
+ tX1 − X2
1002
+ C{0},k,s = (−1)1 · 21 · (1 − t2)·
1003
+ -
1004
+ s = 00
1005
+ 01
1006
+ k = 00
1007
+ −t
1008
+ −t
1009
+ 10
1010
+ 1
1011
+ 1
1012
+ (3) A = {2} Then
1013
+ KA = {(k0, k1) | 0 ≤ k0 ≤ 1, 0 ≤ k1 ≤ 1}
1014
+ = {(0, 0), (0, 1), (1, 0), (1, 1)}
1015
+ KA = {(k0, k1) | 0 ≤ k0 ≤ 1, 0 ≤ k1 ≤ 1, min{k0, k1} = 0}
1016
+ = {(0, 0), (0, 1), (1, 0)}
1017
+ SA = {(0, 0), (0, 1)}.
1018
+ The linear forms and coefficients defined by (k, s) ∈ KA×SA is given by the following tables
1019
+ ℓ{2},k,s =
1020
+ -
1021
+ s = 00
1022
+ 01
1023
+ k = 00
1024
+ X0 + X1
1025
+ X0 − X1
1026
+ 01
1027
+ X0 + tX1
1028
+ X0 − tX1
1029
+ 10
1030
+ tX0 + X1
1031
+ tX0 − X1
1032
+ 11
1033
+ tX0 + tX1
1034
+ tX0 − tX1
1035
+ C{2},k,s = (−1)1 · 21 · 1·
1036
+ -
1037
+ s = 00
1038
+ 01
1039
+ k = 00
1040
+ t3
1041
+ −t3
1042
+ 01
1043
+ −t2
1044
+ t2
1045
+ 10
1046
+ −t
1047
+ t
1048
+ 11
1049
+ 1
1050
+ −1
1051
+ Since tX0±tX1 and X0±X1 represent the same linear form, the proper coefficient C{2},(0,0),s
1052
+ of X0 ± X1 is ∓2(t3 + t9).
1053
+ (4) A = {0, 2} Then
1054
+ KA = {(k1) | 0 ≤ k1 ≤ 1}
1055
+ = {(0), (1)}
1056
+ KA = {(k1) | 0 ≤ k1 ≤ 1, min{k1} = 0}
1057
+ = {(0)}
1058
+ SA = {(0)}.
1059
+ The linear forms and coefficients defined by (k, s) ∈ KA×SA is given by the following tables
1060
+ ℓ{0,2},k,s =
1061
+ -
1062
+ s = 0
1063
+ k = 0
1064
+ X1
1065
+ 1
1066
+ tX1
1067
+ 9
1068
+
1069
+ C{0,2},k,s = (−1)2 · 22 · (1 − t2) · 1·
1070
+ -
1071
+ s = 0
1072
+ k = 0
1073
+ −t
1074
+ 1
1075
+ 1
1076
+ Since the linear forms X1 and tX1 represent the same linear form, the proper coefficient
1077
+ C{0,2},(0),(0) of linear form X1 is 4(1 − t2)(−t + t9) = −4t11 + 4t9 + 4t3 − 4t.
1078
+ Finally, we compute
1079
+ D{4,3,2} = 22 ·
1080
+
1081
+ 9
1082
+ 4, 3, 2
1083
+
1084
+ · (t4 − t2)(t3 − t) = 5040t3(t2 − 1)2 .
1085
+ So, the identity (4) leads to
1086
+ 5040t3(t2 − 1)2X4
1087
+ 0X3
1088
+ 1X2
1089
+ 2 = t3(X0 + X1 + X2)9 + t3(X0 + X1 − X2)9 − t3(X0 − X1 + X2)9
1090
+ − t3(X0 − X1 − X2)9 − t2(X0 + tX1 + X2)9 − t2(X0 + tX1 − X2)9 + t2(X0 − tX1 + X2)9
1091
+ + t2(X0 − tX1 − X2)9 − t(X0 + X1 + tX2)9 − t(X0 + X1 − tX2)9 + t(X0 − X1 + tX2)9
1092
+ + t(X0 − X1 − tX2)9 + (X0 + tX1 + tX2)9 + (X0 + tX1 − tX2)9 − (X0 − tX1 + tX2)9
1093
+ − (X0 − tX1 − tX2)9 − 2(1 − t2)(−t)(X1 + X2)9 − 2(1 − t2)(−t)(X1 − X2)9
1094
+ − 2(1 − t2)(tX1 + X2)9 − 2(1 − t2)(tX1 − X2)9 − 2(t3 + t9)(X0 + X1)2 + 2(t3 + t9)(X0 − X1)9
1095
+ − 2(−t2)(X0 + tX1)9 − 2t2(X0 − tX1)9 − 2(−t)(tX0 + X1)9 − 2t(tX0 − X1)9
1096
+ + 4(1 − t2)(−t + t9)X9
1097
+ 1
1098
+ and as dividing by D{4,3,2} = 5040t3(t2 − 1)2 we eventually have
1099
+ X4
1100
+ 0X3
1101
+ 1X2
1102
+ 2 =
1103
+ 1
1104
+ 5040
1105
+
1106
+ 1
1107
+ (t2 − 1)2 (X0 + X1 + X2)9 +
1108
+ 1
1109
+ (t2 − 1)2 (X0 + X1 − X2)9 −
1110
+ 1
1111
+ (t2 − 1)2 (X0 − X1 + X2)9
1112
+
1113
+ 1
1114
+ (t2 − 1)2 (X0 − X1 − X2)9 −
1115
+ 1
1116
+ t(t2 − 1)2 (X0 + tX1 + X2)9 −
1117
+ 1
1118
+ t(t2 − 1)2 (X0 + tX1 − X2)9
1119
+ +
1120
+ 1
1121
+ t(t2 − 1)2 (X0 − tX1 + X2)9 +
1122
+ 1
1123
+ t(t2 − 1)2 (X0 − tX1 − X2)9 −
1124
+ 1
1125
+ t2(t2 − 1)2 (X0 + X1 + tX2)9
1126
+
1127
+ 1
1128
+ t2(t2 − 1)2 (X0 + X1 − tX2)9 +
1129
+ 1
1130
+ t2(t2 − 1)2 (X0 − X1 + tX2)9 +
1131
+ 1
1132
+ t2(t2 − 1)2 (X0 − X1 − tX2)9
1133
+ +
1134
+ 1
1135
+ t3(t2 − 1)2 (X0 + tX1 + tX2)9 +
1136
+ 1
1137
+ t3(t2 − 1)2 (X0 + tX1 − tX2)9 −
1138
+ 1
1139
+ t3(t2 − 1)2 (X0 − tX1 + tX2)9
1140
+
1141
+ 1
1142
+ t3(t2 − 1)2 (X0 − tX1 − tX2)9 −
1143
+ 2
1144
+ t2(t2 − 1)(X1 + X2)9 −
1145
+ 2
1146
+ t2(t2 − 1)(X1 − X2)9
1147
+ +
1148
+ 2
1149
+ t3(t2 − 1)(tX1 + X2)9 +
1150
+ 2
1151
+ t3(t2 − 1)(tX1 − X2)9 − 2(t6 + 1)
1152
+ (t2 − 1)2 (X0 + X1)2 + 2(t6 + 1)
1153
+ (t2 − 1)2 (X0 − X1)9
1154
+ +
1155
+ 2
1156
+ t(t2 − 1)2 (X0 + tX1)9 −
1157
+ 2
1158
+ t(t2 − 1)2 (X0 − tX1)9 +
1159
+ 2
1160
+ t2(t2 − 1)2 (tX0 + X1)9 −
1161
+ 2
1162
+ t2(t2 − 1)2 (tX0 − X1)9
1163
+ − 4(t2 + 1)(t4 + 1)
1164
+ t2
1165
+ X9
1166
+ 1
1167
+
1168
+ ,
1169
+ which gives us a 1-dimensional family of a Waring decomposition of X4
1170
+ 0X3
1171
+ 1X2
1172
+ 2 (i.e. for all t ∈ k
1173
+ with 5040t3(t2 − 1)2 ̸= 0) of 1
1174
+ 2(5 · 4 · 3 − 3 · 2 · 1) = 27 summands.
1175
+ 3. Case of arbitrary homogeneous form
1176
+ In this section, we consider some consequence of the results in Section 2. Since a homogeneous
1177
+ form in k[X0, . . . , Xn] can be written as a k-linear combination of monomials of the same degree,
1178
+ 10
1179
+
1180
+ by our previous decomposition for a monomial, naturally we have a family of explicit Waring de-
1181
+ compositions of any homogeneous polynomial with k-coefficients. Finding such a sum of powers of
1182
+ linear forms representation of a given degree form is quite important in many areas of mathematics.
1183
+ For instance, when k = Q, it is closely related to the problem of integrating a polynomial function
1184
+ over a rational simplex, which is fundamental for applications such as discrete optimization, finite
1185
+ element methods in numerical analysis, and algebraic statistics computation (see e.g. [2, section 1]
1186
+ and references therein). For computational complexity of this integration problem, Waring decom-
1187
+ position can be used to obtain a polynomial time algorithm for evaluating integrals of polynomials
1188
+ of some fixed constraint (see [2, 3.3, 3.4]). Let’s briefly review some aspect of their result.
1189
+ Let ∆ be a k-dimensional rational simplex inside Rn and let f ∈ Q[X0, . . . , Xn] be a homogeneous
1190
+ polynomial with rational coefficients.
1191
+ To compute
1192
+
1193
+ ∆ fdm, where dm is the integral Lebesgue
1194
+ measure on the affine hull ⟨∆⟩ of the simplex (see [2, 2.1] for the precise definition), we recall a
1195
+ useful formula due to M. Brion as follows.
1196
+ Proposition 3.1. (Brion) Let ∆ be the simplex that is the convex hull of (k+1) affinely independent
1197
+ vertices s1, s2, . . . , sk+1 in Rn. Let ℓ be a linear form which is regular w.r.t. ∆, i.e., ⟨ℓ, si⟩ ̸= ⟨ℓ, sj⟩
1198
+ for any pair i ̸= j. Then we have the following relation
1199
+ (7)
1200
+
1201
+
1202
+ ℓDdm = k! vol(∆, dm)
1203
+ D!
1204
+ (D + k)!
1205
+ �k+1
1206
+
1207
+ i=1
1208
+ ⟨ℓ, si⟩D+k
1209
+
1210
+ j̸=i⟨ℓ, si − sj⟩
1211
+
1212
+ .
1213
+ We note that, even when ℓ is not regular, there exists a similar expansion of the integral as a
1214
+ sum of residues (see e.g. [2, corollary 13]).
1215
+ Thus, once we represent a polynomial by a sum of power of rational linear forms, the integration
1216
+ immediately follows. And bounding the number of rational linear forms in the sum and finding
1217
+ all its Q-coefficients are among the main issues for the computational complexity of evaluating
1218
+ integrals of polynomials over a rational simplex.
1219
+ Now, let us consider the number of the summands in a given rational Waring decomposition of
1220
+ fgen, a general homogeneous polynomial of degree D in (n+1)-variables (here, we mean a ‘general’
1221
+ form by the one having all the monomials of total degree D).
1222
+ In [2], the authors used the following well-known identity, which is somewhat naive from the
1223
+ viewpoint of Waring rank, to consider their rational decomposition of fgen,
1224
+ (8)
1225
+ Xa0
1226
+ 0 Xa1
1227
+ 1 · · · Xan
1228
+ n
1229
+ = 1
1230
+ D!
1231
+
1232
+ 0≤pi≤ai
1233
+ (−1)D−(p0+···+pn)�a0
1234
+ p0
1235
+
1236
+ · · ·
1237
+ �an
1238
+ pn
1239
+
1240
+ (p0X0 + · · · + pnXn)D ,
1241
+ where a = (a0, . . . , an) and D = |a| = a0 + · · · + an. To count the number of summands properly,
1242
+ one should group together proportional linear forms among the whole decomposition of fgen. The
1243
+ concept of primitive vectors (i.e. (p0, . . . , pn) ∈ Zn
1244
+ ≥0 with gcd(p0, . . . , pn) = 1) precisely captures this
1245
+ number. Let F(n, D) be this number of minimal summands in the rational Waring decomposition
1246
+ of fgen using (8). Then, it is shown in [2, lemma 16] that F(n, D) is equal to
1247
+ (9)
1248
+ |{(p0, . . . , pn) ∈ Zn
1249
+ ≥0, gcd(p0, . . . , pn) = 1, 1 ≤
1250
+
1251
+ i
1252
+ pi ≤ D}| =
1253
+ D
1254
+
1255
+ d=1
1256
+ µ(d) ·
1257
+ ��n + 1 + ⌊D
1258
+ d ⌋
1259
+ n + 1
1260
+
1261
+ − 1
1262
+
1263
+ ,
1264
+ where µ is the M¨obius function.
1265
+ Now, let us estimate this number as increasing the total degree in a fixed number of variables.
1266
+ As getting large D with a fixed n, by (9) the asymptotic behavior of F(n, D) can be calculated as
1267
+ (10)
1268
+ F(n, D) = δ(n, D)
1269
+ (n + 1)!Dn+1 + O(Dn) ,
1270
+ 11
1271
+
1272
+ where δ(n, D) =
1273
+ D
1274
+
1275
+ d=1
1276
+ µ(d)
1277
+ dn+1 . Since the Dirichlet series that generates the M¨obius function is the
1278
+ inverse of the Riemann zeta function ζ(s), which converges for Re(s) > 1, we see that δ(n, D) →
1279
+ 1
1280
+ ζ(n+1) as D → ∞ and F(n, D) asymptotically has order of Dn+1 in this setting.
1281
+ On the other hand, if we regard the rational Waring decomposition of fgen by considering each
1282
+ monomial summand using our result, that is, Corollary 2.5, much less linear forms are needed to
1283
+ represent the polynomial asymptotically. Let K(n, D) be the number of minimal summands in the
1284
+ rational Waring decomposition of fgen via (4).
1285
+ Theorem 3.2. Let n ≥ 1, D ≥ 1 be positive integers and K(n, D) be as above. Then, we have the
1286
+ following formula
1287
+ (11)
1288
+ K(n, D) =
1289
+ n+1
1290
+
1291
+ r=1
1292
+ ��⌊D−r
1293
+ 2 ⌋ + r
1294
+ r
1295
+
1296
+
1297
+ �⌊D−r
1298
+ 2 ⌋
1299
+ r
1300
+ ��
1301
+ · 2r−1 ·
1302
+ �n + 1
1303
+ r
1304
+
1305
+ .
1306
+ In particular, when n is fixed and D → ∞, we have
1307
+ (12)
1308
+ K(n, D) = n + 1
1309
+ n!
1310
+ Dn + O(Dn−1) ,
1311
+ which has order of Dn asymptotically.
1312
+ Proof. Let L{i1,...,ir} be the set of all linear forms appeared in the Waring decomposition of fgen
1313
+ via (4) such that every member of L{i1,...,ir} is of the form λ1Xi1 + λ2Xi2 + · · · + λrXir for some
1314
+ nonzero λu’s. Then, by the proof of Corollary 2.5 we have
1315
+ L{i1,...,ir} :=
1316
+
1317
+ r
1318
+
1319
+ j=1
1320
+ (−1)sij tkij Xij |
1321
+ r
1322
+
1323
+ j=1
1324
+ aij = D, 0 ≤ kij ≤ mij = ⌊aij − 1
1325
+ 2
1326
+
1327
+ , min{kij} = 0, sij ∈ {0, 1}, and si1 = 0
1328
+
1329
+ .
1330
+ In this set, each (ki1, ki2, . . . , kir) should satisfy the following inequality
1331
+ 0 ≤
1332
+ r
1333
+
1334
+ j=1
1335
+ kij ≤
1336
+ r
1337
+
1338
+ j=1
1339
+ mij =
1340
+ r
1341
+
1342
+ j=1
1343
+ ⌊aij − 1
1344
+ 2
1345
+ ⌋ · · · (∗∗)
1346
+ and note that both {ai1, ai2, . . . , air} and {ai1, . . . , aip −1, . . . , aiq +1, . . . , air} have the same r-tuple
1347
+ of kij’s satisfying (∗∗) whenever aip and aiq are all even. Thus, we can assume that at most one
1348
+ of aij is even. If D ≡ r (mod 2) and all the aij are odd, �r
1349
+ j=1 mij = �r
1350
+ j=1
1351
+ aij −1
1352
+ 2
1353
+ = D−r
1354
+ 2 . If
1355
+ D ̸≡ r(mod 2) and all the aij are odd except one, �r
1356
+ j=1 mij = D−r−1
1357
+ 2
1358
+ . Hence, for a given D, we
1359
+ get
1360
+ L{i1,...,ir} :=
1361
+
1362
+ r
1363
+
1364
+ j=1
1365
+ (−1)sij tkij Xij | 0 ≤
1366
+ r
1367
+
1368
+ j=1
1369
+ kij ≤ ⌊D − r
1370
+ 2
1371
+ ⌋, min{kij} = 0, sij ∈ {0, 1}, and si1 = 0
1372
+
1373
+ so that the number of elements in L{i1,...,ir} as follows
1374
+ |L{i1,i2,...,ir}| =
1375
+ ����
1376
+
1377
+ (kij) | 0 ≤
1378
+ r
1379
+
1380
+ j=1
1381
+ kij ≤ ⌊D − r
1382
+ 2
1383
+ ⌋, min{kij} = 0
1384
+ ����� ·
1385
+ ����
1386
+
1387
+ (sij) | sij ∈ {0, 1}, and si1 = 0
1388
+ �����
1389
+ =
1390
+ ��⌊D−r
1391
+ 2 ⌋ + r
1392
+ r
1393
+
1394
+
1395
+ �⌊D−r
1396
+ 2 ⌋
1397
+ r
1398
+ ��
1399
+ · 2r−1 .
1400
+ Finally, as multiplying
1401
+ �n+1
1402
+ r
1403
+
1404
+ for the possible choices for the indices {i1, . . . , ir} ⊂ {0, . . . , n}, the
1405
+ equation (11) is obtained.
1406
+ 12
1407
+
1408
+ As getting large D with fixed n, the highest power of D is obtained when r = n + 1. So, we
1409
+ estimate as
1410
+ K(n, D) ≈
1411
+ �� D−(n+1)
1412
+ 2
1413
+ + n + 1
1414
+ n + 1
1415
+
1416
+
1417
+ � D−(n+1)
1418
+ 2
1419
+ r
1420
+ ��
1421
+ · 2n ·
1422
+ �n + 1
1423
+ n + 1
1424
+
1425
+ =
1426
+ �� D+(n+1)
1427
+ 2
1428
+ n + 1
1429
+
1430
+
1431
+ � D−(n+1)
1432
+ 2
1433
+ r
1434
+ ��
1435
+ · 2n
1436
+ =
1437
+ �Dn+1 + (n + 1)2Dn + O(Dn−1)
1438
+ 2n+1(n + 1)!
1439
+ − Dn+1 − (n + 1)2Dn + O(Dn−1)
1440
+ 2n+1(n + 1)!
1441
+
1442
+ · 2n
1443
+ = n + 1
1444
+ n!
1445
+ Dn + O(Dn−1) ,
1446
+ where the asymptotic order is Dn which is better than Dn+1 in the case of F(n, D).
1447
+
1448
+ Remark 3.3. We make some remarks on the theorem above.
1449
+ (a) The formula (11) gives a new upper bound for Q-Waring rank of arbitrary rational homo-
1450
+ geneous polynomial. Unfortunately, this is not better than a naive bound
1451
+ �D+n
1452
+ n
1453
+
1454
+ , which
1455
+ comes from dim Q[X0, X1, . . . , Xn], asymptotically. But, the latter approach does not give
1456
+ an explicit linear forms of the power sum decomposition and its coefficients (remember that
1457
+ one should execute a massive computation to find them), whereas our method does provide
1458
+ a completely determined(!) power sum decomposition.
1459
+ (b) Note that F(n, D) and K(n, D) have different orders in the above asymptote by (10) and
1460
+ (12) (see also Table 1 for a significant difference between F(n, D) and K(n, D)).
1461
+ (c) In [3] the authors also provide a Waring decomposition of any monomial with determined
1462
+ coefficients over the complex number C. Since their rank is better than the bound (2), the
1463
+ approach using their decomposition would be surely better than the method via (4) for
1464
+ decomposing any homogeneous form. But, note that in their coefficient formula a complex
1465
+ number does occur in most cases (!), which puts a serious limitation for applying their
1466
+ method in application over real or rational numbers.
1467
+ (n, D)
1468
+ (2, 10)
1469
+ (2,50)
1470
+ (2,100)
1471
+ (3,10)
1472
+ (3,50)
1473
+ (3,100)
1474
+ (5,30)
1475
+ (5,50)
1476
+ (5,100)
1477
+ F(n, D)
1478
+ 205
1479
+ 18,970
1480
+ 144,871
1481
+ 831
1482
+ 286,893
1483
+ 4,207,287
1484
+ 1,884,921
1485
+ 31,651,125
1486
+ 1,669,982,466
1487
+ K(n, D)
1488
+ 133
1489
+ 3,613
1490
+ 14,713
1491
+ 696
1492
+ 83,416
1493
+ 666,816
1494
+ 1,305,092
1495
+ 16,001,276
1496
+ 502,701,736
1497
+ Table 1. Comparison of numbers of summands in the two Waring decompositions
1498
+ of fgen, a general homogeneous polynomial of degree D in n + 1 variables, based on
1499
+ a previously known method (8) in [2] and the method in this paper (4)
1500
+ 4. Macaulay2 code for the decompositions
1501
+ Finally, we present a Macaulay2[10] code which computes the Waring-type polynomial identity
1502
+ concerning any given monomial over k in Section 2 and we execute it for X4
1503
+ 0X3
1504
+ 1X2
1505
+ 2, the case in
1506
+ Example 2.8.
1507
+ + M2 −−no−r e ad l i n e −−print−width 79
1508
+ Macaulay2 ,
1509
+ version
1510
+ 1.17
1511
+ with
1512
+ packages :
1513
+ ConwayPolynomials ,
1514
+ Elimination ,
1515
+ IntegralClosure ,
1516
+ InverseSystems , LLLBases ,
1517
+ MinimalPrimes ,
1518
+ PrimaryDecomposition ,
1519
+ ReesAlgebra ,
1520
+ Saturation ,
1521
+ TangentCone
1522
+ 13
1523
+
1524
+ i1
1525
+ : −−For a given
1526
+ sequence a ,
1527
+ find
1528
+ a l l
1529
+ the
1530
+ pairs
1531
+ (A, k , s )
1532
+ A k s l i s t e r=method ( ) ;
1533
+ i2
1534
+ :
1535
+ A k s l i s t e r ( List ):=a−>(
1536
+ n:=#a−1;
1537
+ A k s l i s t :={};
1538
+ E:= f or
1539
+ i
1540
+ from 0 to n
1541
+ l i s t
1542
+ i f ( even ( a i ))
1543
+ then
1544
+ i
1545
+ e l s e
1546
+ continue ;
1547
+ Z:= f or
1548
+ i
1549
+ from 0 to n
1550
+ l i s t
1551
+ i f ( a i ==0) then
1552
+ i
1553
+ e l s e
1554
+ continue ;
1555
+ Alist0 := subsets ( toList ( set (E)− set (Z ) ) ) ;
1556
+ A l i s t := f or
1557
+ i
1558
+ from 0 to #Alist0 −1 l i s t
1559
+ sort (Z | A l i s t 0 i ) ;
1560
+ f or
1561
+ i1
1562
+ from 0 to #Alist −1 do
1563
+ i f (#( A l i s t i 1 )!=n+1) then
1564
+ (
1565
+ A:= A l i s t i 1 ;
1566
+ notInA:= sort
1567
+ toList ( set ( 0 . . n)− set (A) ) ;
1568
+ KA:= toList (( f or
1569
+ i
1570
+ from 0 to #notInA−1 l i s t
1571
+ 0 ) . .
1572
+ ( f or
1573
+ i
1574
+ from 0 to #notInA−1 l i s t
1575
+ f l o o r (( a ( notInA i ) −1)/2)));
1576
+ KAbar:= f or
1577
+ i
1578
+ from 0 to #KA−1 l i s t
1579
+ i f (min( KA i)==0)
1580
+ then KA i
1581
+ e l s e
1582
+ continue ;
1583
+ SA:= toList (( f or
1584
+ i
1585
+ from 0 to #notInA−1 l i s t
1586
+ 0 ) . .
1587
+ ({0}| f or
1588
+ i
1589
+ from 1 to #notInA−1 l i s t
1590
+ 1 ) ) ;
1591
+ f or
1592
+ i2
1593
+ from 0 to #KAbar−1 do (
1594
+ kk:=KAbar i2 ;
1595
+ f or
1596
+ i3
1597
+ from 0 to #SA−1 do(
1598
+ ss :=SA i3 ;
1599
+ A k s l i s t=append( Akslist ,{A, notInA , kk , ss }) ;
1600
+ )
1601
+ )
1602
+ )
1603
+ e l s e
1604
+ continue ;
1605
+ A k s l i s t
1606
+ ) ;
1607
+ i3
1608
+ : −−For a given
1609
+ pair
1610
+ (A, k , s ) ,
1611
+ find a
1612
+ l i n e a r
1613
+ form
1614
+ l {A, k , s}
1615
+ linform=method ( ) ;
1616
+ i4
1617
+ :
1618
+ linform ( Ring ,
1619
+ List ):=(R, Aks)−>(
1620
+ (A, notInA , kk , I ):= toSequence (Aks ) ;
1621
+ bR:= baseRing (R) ;
1622
+ t0 :=sub (2 ,R) ;
1623
+ i f ( numgens bR!=0)
1624
+ then
1625
+ t0=bR 0 ;
1626
+ sum f or
1627
+ i
1628
+ from 0 to #notInA−1 l i s t
1629
+ ( −1)ˆ( I i )∗( t0 )ˆ( kk i )∗R ( notInA i )
1630
+ ) ;
1631
+ i5
1632
+ : −−For a given monomial ,
1633
+ find
1634
+ a l l
1635
+ the
1636
+ l i n e a r
1637
+ forms
1638
+ 14
1639
+
1640
+ linforms=method ( ) ;
1641
+ i6
1642
+ :
1643
+ linforms ( RingElement ):=(mon)−>(
1644
+ R:= ring mon;
1645
+ a:=( exponents mon) 0 ;
1646
+ A k s l i s t := A k s l i s t e r ( a ) ;
1647
+ f or
1648
+ i
1649
+ from 0 to #Akslist −1 l i s t
1650
+ linform (R, A k s l i s t i )
1651
+ ) ;
1652
+ i7
1653
+ : −−For a given
1654
+ sequence a ,
1655
+ find
1656
+ F i
1657
+ F l i s t=method ( ) ;
1658
+ i8
1659
+ :
1660
+ F l i s t ( List , Ring , ZZ):=( a , S , ind)−>(
1661
+ mind:= f l o o r (( a ind −1)/2);
1662
+ bS=baseRing (S ) ;
1663
+ t0 :=sub (2 ,S ) ;
1664
+ i f ( numgens bS!=0)
1665
+ then
1666
+ t0=bS 0 ;
1667
+ i f (mind<=0) then sub (1 ,S)
1668
+ e l s e
1669
+ sub ( product
1670
+ f or
1671
+ i
1672
+ from 1 to mind
1673
+ l i s t
1674
+ S 0 −(t0 )ˆ( a ind −2∗ i ) , S)
1675
+ ) ;
1676
+ i9
1677
+ : −−For a given
1678
+ pair
1679
+ (A, k , s ) ,
1680
+ find a
1681
+ c o e f f i c i e n t
1682
+ C {A, k , s}
1683
+ c f s=method ( ) ;
1684
+ i10
1685
+ :
1686
+ c f s ( List , Ring , List ):=( a ,R, Aks)−>(
1687
+ (A, notInA , kk , ss ):= toSequence (Aks ) ;
1688
+ bR:=baseRing (R) ;
1689
+ S:=bR[Y] ;
1690
+ C1:=(−2)ˆ(#A)∗ product
1691
+ f or
1692
+ i
1693
+ from 0 to #A−1 l i s t
1694
+ sub ( F l i s t (a , S , A i ) , sub ( matrix {{1}} ,bR ) ) ;
1695
+ C2:= product
1696
+ f or
1697
+ i
1698
+ from 0 to #notInA−1 l i s t
1699
+ sub ( c o e f f i c i e n t (( S 0 )ˆ( kk i ) , F l i s t (a , S , notInA i ) ) ,bR) ;
1700
+ C3:=sub (( −1)ˆ(sum f or
1701
+ i
1702
+ from 0 to #ss −1 l i s t
1703
+ a ( notInA i )∗ s s i ) ,bR) ;
1704
+ C1∗C2∗C3
1705
+ ) ;
1706
+ i11
1707
+ : −−For a given
1708
+ pair
1709
+ (A, k , s ) ,
1710
+ find a
1711
+ p r i n c i p l e
1712
+ c o e f f i c i e n t
1713
+ C {A, k , s}
1714
+ pcfs=method ( ) ;
1715
+ i12
1716
+ :
1717
+ pcfs ( List , Ring , List ):=( a ,R, Aks)−>(
1718
+ (A, notInA , kk , ss ):= toSequence (Aks ) ;
1719
+ bR:=baseRing (R) ;
1720
+ t0 :=sub (2 ,R) ;
1721
+ 15
1722
+
1723
+ i f ( numgens bR!=0)
1724
+ then t0=bR 0 ;
1725
+ sum f or
1726
+ j
1727
+ from 0 to min( f or
1728
+ i
1729
+ from 0 to #notInA−1
1730
+ l i s t
1731
+ f l o o r (( a ( notInA i )−1)/2)− kk i )
1732
+ l i s t
1733
+ ( t0 )ˆ( j ∗(sum a ))∗
1734
+ c f s (a ,R,{A, notInA , kk+( f or
1735
+ i
1736
+ from 0 to #notInA−1 l i s t
1737
+ j ) , ss })
1738
+ ) ;
1739
+ i13
1740
+ : −−For a given monomial ,
1741
+ find
1742
+ the
1743
+ c o e f f i c i e n t
1744
+ D a
1745
+ D=method ( ) ;
1746
+ i14
1747
+ : D( RingElement ):=(mon)−>(
1748
+ a:=( exponents (mon)) 0 ;
1749
+ R:= ring mon;
1750
+ bR:=baseRing (R) ;
1751
+ S:=bR[Y] ;
1752
+ t0 :=sub (2 ,R) ;
1753
+ i f ( numgens bR!=0)
1754
+ then t0=bR 0 ;
1755
+ Z:= f or
1756
+ i
1757
+ from 0 to #a−1 l i s t
1758
+ i f ( a i ==0) then
1759
+ i
1760
+ e l s e
1761
+ continue ;
1762
+ sub((−1)ˆ(#Z)∗2ˆ(#a −1)∗((sum a ) ! / ( product
1763
+ f or
1764
+ i
1765
+ from 0 to #a−1 l i s t
1766
+ ( a i ) ! ) ) ∗
1767
+ ( product
1768
+ f or
1769
+ i
1770
+ from 0 to #a−1
1771
+ l i s t
1772
+ sub ( F l i s t (a , S , i ) , matrix {{ t0 ˆ( a i )}})) ,bR)
1773
+ ) ;
1774
+ i15
1775
+ : −−For a given monomial ,
1776
+ find
1777
+ a l l
1778
+ the
1779
+ c o e f f i c i e n t s
1780
+ c o e f f s=method ( ) ;
1781
+ i16
1782
+ :
1783
+ c o e f f s ( RingElement ):=(mon)−>(
1784
+ R:= ring mon;
1785
+ a:=( exponents (mon)) 0 ;
1786
+ pl := A k s l i s t e r ( a ) ;
1787
+ f or
1788
+ i
1789
+ from 0 to #pl −1 l i s t
1790
+ pcfs (a ,R, p l i )
1791
+ ) ;
1792
+ i17
1793
+ : −−Test
1794
+ f or m=X 0ˆ4X 1ˆ3X 2ˆ2
1795
+ −−Ring over a
1796
+ f r a c t i o n a l
1797
+ f i e l d
1798
+ of Q[ t ]
1799
+ T=QQ[ t ]
1800
+ o17 = T
1801
+ o17
1802
+ :
1803
+ PolynomialRing
1804
+ i18
1805
+ :
1806
+ fT=f r ac T
1807
+ o18 = fT
1808
+ 16
1809
+
1810
+ o18
1811
+ :
1812
+ FractionField
1813
+ i19
1814
+ : R=fT [ X 0 . . X 2 ]
1815
+ o19 = R
1816
+ o19
1817
+ :
1818
+ PolynomialRing
1819
+ i20
1820
+ : m=X 0ˆ4∗X 1ˆ3∗X 2ˆ2
1821
+ 4 3 2
1822
+ o20 = X X X
1823
+ 0 1 2
1824
+ o20
1825
+ : R
1826
+ i21
1827
+ : −−linearforms
1828
+ r e l at e d
1829
+ to m
1830
+ l s=linforms (m) ;
1831
+ i22
1832
+ : −−corresponding
1833
+ c o e f f i c i e n t s
1834
+ r e l at e d
1835
+ to m
1836
+ cs=c o e f f s (m) ;
1837
+ i23
1838
+ : −−check
1839
+ the
1840
+ equality
1841
+ of RHS and LHS of
1842
+ the
1843
+ Corollary
1844
+ rhs=sum f or
1845
+ i
1846
+ from 0 to #cs −1 l i s t
1847
+ c s i ∗( l s i )ˆ(( degree m) 0 )
1848
+ 7
1849
+ 5
1850
+ 3
1851
+ 4 3 2
1852
+ o23 = (5040 t
1853
+ − 10080 t
1854
+ + 5040 t
1855
+ )X X X
1856
+ 0 1 2
1857
+ o23
1858
+ : R
1859
+ i24
1860
+ :
1861
+ lhs=D(m)∗m
1862
+ 7
1863
+ 5
1864
+ 3
1865
+ 4 3 2
1866
+ o24 = (5040 t
1867
+ − 10080 t
1868
+ + 5040 t
1869
+ )X X X
1870
+ 0 1 2
1871
+ o24
1872
+ : R
1873
+ i25
1874
+ :
1875
+ lhs==rhs
1876
+ o25 = true
1877
+ 17
1878
+
1879
+ Acknowledgments
1880
+ The first author was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant
1881
+ funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2021R1F1A104818611) and the second author was
1882
+ supported by KIAS Individual Grant (MG083101) at Korea Institute of Advanced Study (KIAS).
1883
+ References
1884
+ [1] J. Alexander and A. Hirschowitz, Polynomial interpolation in several variables, J. Alg. Geom., 4 (1995), no. 2,
1885
+ 201–222.
1886
+ [2] Baldoni, V., Berline, N., De Loera, J., K¨oppe, M., and Vergne, M., How to integrate a polynomial over a simplex,
1887
+ Mathematics of Computation, 80 (no. 273), 297–325 (2011).
1888
+ [3] W. Buczy´nska, J. Buczy´nski, Z. Teitler, Waring decompositions of monomials, J. Algebra 378, 45–57 (2013).
1889
+ [4] M. Boij, E. Carlini, A. V. Geramita, Monomials as sums of powers: the real binary case, Proc. Am. Math. Soc.
1890
+ 139, 3039–3043 (2011).
1891
+ [5] E. Carlini, M. V. Catalisano, A.V. Geramita, The solution to Waring’s problem for monomials and the sum of
1892
+ coprime monomials, J. Algebra 370, 5–14 (2012).
1893
+ [6] E. Carlini, M. Kummer, A. Oneto and E. Ventura, On the real rank of monomials, Math. Z., 286 (2017), 571–577.
1894
+ [7] C. J. Hillar and L.-H. Lim, Most tensor problems are NP-hard, Journal of the ACM. 60 (6) (2013), 1–39.
1895
+ [8] K. Han and H. Moon, A New Bound for the Waring Rank of Monomials, SIAM J. Appl. Algebra Geom. 6 (3)
1896
+ (2022), 407–‌431.
1897
+ [9] A. Iarrobino and V. Kanev, Power sums, Gorenstein algebras, and determinantal loci, Lect. Notes in Math. vol.
1898
+ 1721, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Appendix C by Iarrobino and S.L. Kleiman, 1999.
1899
+ [10] D. R. Grayson and M. E. Stillman, Macaulay 2, a software system for research in algebraic geometry,
1900
+ http://www.math.uiuc.edu/Macaulay2/.
1901
+ Kangjin Han, School of Undergraduate Studies, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Institute of Science & Tech-
1902
+ nology (DGIST), Daegu 42988, Republic of Korea
1903
+ Email address: [email protected]
1904
+ Hyunsuk Moon, School of Mathematics, Korea Institute for Advanced Study (KIAS), Seoul 02455,
1905
+ Republic of Korea
1906
1907
+ 18
1908
+
XdE1T4oBgHgl3EQfbwSy/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
btFJT4oBgHgl3EQf9S1J/content/tmp_files/2301.11687v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,3835 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Theoretical Analysis of Offline Imitation With Supplementary
2
+ Dataset
3
+ Ziniu Li *1,2, Tian Xu∗3, Yang Yu†3, and Zhi-Quan Luo†1,2
4
+ 1The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
5
+ 2Shenzhen Research Institute of Big Data
6
+ 3National Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University
7
+ January 30, 2023
8
+ Abstract
9
+ Behavioral cloning (BC) can recover a good policy from abundant expert data, but may fail when expert
10
+ data is insufficient. This paper considers a situation where, besides the small amount of expert data, a
11
+ supplementary dataset is available, which can be collected cheaply from sub-optimal policies. Imitation
12
+ learning with a supplementary dataset is an emergent practical framework, but its theoretical foundation
13
+ remains under-developed. To advance understanding, we first investigate a direct extension of BC, called
14
+ NBCU, that learns from the union of all available data. Our analysis shows that, although NBCU suffers
15
+ an imitation gap that is larger than BC in the worst case, there exist special cases where NBCU performs
16
+ better than or equally well as BC. This discovery implies that noisy data can also be helpful if utilized
17
+ elaborately. Therefore, we further introduce a discriminator-based importance sampling technique to
18
+ re-weight the supplementary data, proposing the WBCU method. With our newly developed landscape-based
19
+ analysis, we prove that WBCU can outperform BC in mild conditions. Empirical studies show that WBCU
20
+ simultaneously achieves the best performance on two challenging tasks where prior state-of-the-art methods
21
+ fail.
22
+ 1
23
+ Introduction
24
+ Imitation learning (IL) methods train a good policy from expert demonstrations [Argall et al., 2009, Osa
25
+ et al., 2018]. One popular approach is behavioral cloning (BC) [Pomerleau, 1991], which imitates the
26
+ expert via supervised learning. Specifically, in IL, samples usually refer to state-action pairs/sequences
27
+ from trajectories in the given dataset. Both the quality and quantity of trajectories are crucial to achieving
28
+ satisfying performance. For instance, it is found that BC performs well when the dataset has a large amount
29
+ of expert-level trajectories; see, e.g., [Spencer et al., 2021]. Nevertheless, due to the compounding errors
30
+ issue [Ross and Bagnell, 2010], any offline IL algorithm, including BC, will fail when the number of expert
31
+ trajectories is small [Rajaraman et al., 2020, Xu et al., 2021a]. To address the compounding errors issue, a
32
+ naive solution is to ask the expert to collect more trajectories. However, querying the expert is expensive and
33
+ intractable in applications such as healthcare and industrial control.
34
+ To address the mentioned failure mode, we follow an alternative and emergent framework proposed in
35
+ [Kim et al., 2022b, Xu et al., 2022a], which assumes, in addition to the expert dataset, a supplementary dataset
36
+ is relatively cheap to obtain. In particular, this supplementary dataset could be previously collected by
37
+ certain behavior policies; as such, it has lots of expert and sub-optimal trajectories. The key challenge here is
38
+ *Equal contribution. Author ordering is determined by coin flip. Email: [email protected] and [email protected]
39
+ †Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] and [email protected]
40
+ 1
41
+ arXiv:2301.11687v1 [cs.LG] 27 Jan 2023
42
+
43
+ to figure out which supplemental samples are helpful. We realize that a few advances have been achieved in
44
+ this direction [Kim et al., 2022b,a, Xu et al., 2022a, Ma et al., 2022]. To leverage the supplementary dataset, a
45
+ majority of algorithms train a discriminator to distinguish expert-style and sub-optimal samples, upon which
46
+ a weighted BC objective is optimized to learn a good policy. For instance, Kim et al. [2022b] proposed the
47
+ DemoDICE algorithm, which learns the discriminator via a regularized state-action distribution matching
48
+ objective. As for the DWBC algorithm in [Xu et al., 2022a], the policy and discriminator are jointly trained
49
+ under a cooperation framework.
50
+ Though prior algorithms are empirically shown to perform well in some scenarios, the theoretical
51
+ foundation of this new imitation problem remains under-developed. Specifically, researchers have a sketchy
52
+ intuition that noisy demonstrations in the supplementary dataset may hurt the performance when we
53
+ directly apply BC, and researchers hope to develop algorithms to overcome this challenge. However, the
54
+ following questions have not been carefully answered yet: (Q1) precisely, what kind of noisy samples is
55
+ harmful? (or what kind of supplementary samples is helpful?) (Q2) how to design algorithms in a principled
56
+ way? Answers could deepen our understanding and provide insights for future advances.
57
+ In this paper, we explore the above questions by investigating two (independent) variants of BC. To learn
58
+ a policy, both algorithms apply a BC objective on the union dataset (the concatenation of the expert and
59
+ supplementary dataset), but they differ in assigning weights of samples that appear in the loss function. To
60
+ qualify the benefits of the supplementary dataset, we treat the BC only with the expert dataset as a baseline
61
+ to compare.
62
+ The first algorithm, called NBCU (naive BC with union dataset), assigns uniform weights for all samples.
63
+ As a direct extension of BC, the theoretical study of NBCU provides answers to (Q1). In particular, we show
64
+ that NBCU suffers an imitation gap that is larger than BC in the worst case (Theorem 2 and Proposition 1),
65
+ implying its inferior performance in the general case. However, we discover special cases where NBCU
66
+ performs better than or equally well as BC (Theorem 3 and Theorem 4). This discovery indicates that
67
+ noisy data can also be helpful if utilized elaborately. To our best knowledge, such a message is new to the
68
+ community. We provide the empirical evidence in Figure 1 and discuss these results in depth later.
69
+ As NBCU (i.e., the direct extension of BC) may fail in the worst case, we develop another algorithm called
70
+ WBCU (weighted BC with union dataset) to address this failure mode. In light of [Kim et al., 2022b, Xu et al.,
71
+ 2022a], WBCU trains a discriminator to weigh samples. We use the importance sampling technique [Shapiro,
72
+ 2003, Chapter 9] to design the weighting rule. Unlike prior works [Kim et al., 2022b, Xu et al., 2022a] that use
73
+ a biased (or regularized) weighting rule, WBCU is theoretically sound and principled in the sense that the
74
+ loss function is corrected as if samples from the supplementary dataset were collected by the expert policy;
75
+ see Remark 1 for detailed discussion.
76
+ Theoretically, we justify WBCU via a new landscaped-based analysis (Theorem 5). We characterize
77
+ the landscape properties (e.g., the Lipschitz continuity and quadratic growth conditions) in Lemma 1 and
78
+ Lemma 2. Interestingly, we find that the “smooth” function approximation for the discriminator plays a
79
+ vital role in WBCU; without it, WBCU cannot be better than BC (Proposition 2). Our theory can provide
80
+ actionable guidance for practitioners; see Section 5.2 for details. These results offer answers to (Q2).
81
+ Finally, we corroborate our claims with experiments on the MuJoCo locomotion control. Given the same
82
+ expert dataset (1 expert trajectory), we consider two tasks with different supplementary datasets. The first
83
+ task (called full replay) follows the setting in [Kim et al., 2022b]: supplementary trajectories are from the
84
+ replay buffer of an online SAC agent [Haarnoja et al., 2018]. The second task (called noisy expert) is a new
85
+ test-bed: the supplementary dataset contains clean expert-style trajectories, and the noisy counterparts1.
86
+ Please refer to Appendix D.1 for experiment details. Please see Figure 1 for the (averaged) normalized
87
+ scores of learned policies over four representative MuJoCo environments2 (performance on individual
88
+ environments is reported in Table 2 and Table 3 in Appendix). We find that WBCU simultaneously achieves
89
+ the best performance on both two tasks, whereas prior state-of-the-art methods like DemoDICE [Kim et al.,
90
+ 2022b] and DWBC [Xu et al., 2022a] only perform well on one of two tasks. We will connect the experiment
91
+ results with theoretical analysis in the main text.
92
+ 1Noisy counterparts cover expert states but are injected with action noise.
93
+ 2Ant-v2, HalfCheetah-v2, Hopper-v2, and Walker2d-v2.
94
+ 2
95
+
96
+ Noisy Expert
97
+ Full Replay
98
+ Task
99
+ 0
100
+ 20
101
+ 40
102
+ 60
103
+ 80
104
+ Normalized Score (%)
105
+ 38
106
+ 38
107
+ 49
108
+ 94
109
+ 62
110
+ 44
111
+ 35
112
+ 92
113
+ 64
114
+ 94
115
+ Algorithm
116
+ BC
117
+ DemoDICE
118
+ DWBC
119
+ NBCU
120
+ WBCU
121
+ Figure 1: Averaged normalized scores of learned policies (over 4 MuJoCo environments) on two tasks with
122
+ different supplementary datasets. A larger score means a better performance. Experiments show that 1)
123
+ NBCU is worse than BC for the noisy expert task and better than BC for the full replay task; 2) only our
124
+ method WBCU can perform well on both two tasks.
125
+ 2
126
+ Related Work
127
+ Adversarial Imitation Learning. Unlike BC, adversarial imitation learning (AIL) methods (e.g., GAIL [Ho
128
+ and Ermon, 2016]) do not suffer the compounding errors issue when the expert trajectories are limited;
129
+ see the empirical evidence in [Ho and Ermon, 2016, Ghasemipour et al., 2019, Kostrikov et al., 2019] and
130
+ theoretical support in [Xu et al., 2020, 2022b]. In particular, AIL methods train a discriminator to perform the
131
+ state-action distribution matching, which differs from BC. Nevertheless, AIL methods naturally work in
132
+ the online setting (i.e., the interaction is allowed). If the transition function is not available, BC is minimax
133
+ optimal [Rajaraman et al., 2020, Xu et al., 2021b] and offline counterparts of AIL are not better than BC [Li
134
+ et al., 2022].
135
+ Perhaps surprisingly, we find that the discriminator used in our WBCU algorithm plays a different role
136
+ than AIL methods. We provide a detailed explanation in Section 5.
137
+ Imitation Learning with Imperfect Demonstrations. The problem considered in this paper is closely
138
+ related to imitation learning (IL) with imperfect demonstrations [Wu et al., 2019, Brown et al., 2019, Tangkaratt
139
+ et al., 2020, Wang et al., 2021, Sasaki and Yamashina, 2021, Liu et al., 2022] in the sense that the supplementary
140
+ dataset can also be viewed as imperfect demonstrations. However, our problem setting differs from IL with
141
+ imperfect demonstrations in two key aspects. First, in IL with imperfect demonstrations, they either pose
142
+ strong assumptions [Tangkaratt et al., 2020, Sasaki and Yamashina, 2021, Liu et al., 2022] or require auxiliary
143
+ information (e.g., confidence scores on imperfect trajectories) on the imperfect dataset [Wu et al., 2019, Brown
144
+ et al., 2019]. In contrast, we assume access to a small number of expert trajectories, which could be more
145
+ practical. Second, most works [Wu et al., 2019, Brown et al., 2019, Tangkaratt et al., 2020, Wang et al., 2021]
146
+ in IL with imperfect demonstrations require online environment interactions while we focus on the offline
147
+ setting.
148
+ Finally, we point out that the problem of offline imitation learning with a supplementary dataset is first
149
+ considered in [Kim et al., 2022b, Xu et al., 2022a]. Subsequently, Ma et al. [2022], Kim et al. [2022a] study a
150
+ related setting: learning from observation, where actions are missing and only states are observed. Existing
151
+ works mainly focus on empirical studies, and the theoretical foundation remains under-developed.
152
+ 3
153
+
154
+ 3
155
+ Preliminary
156
+ Markov Decision Process. In this paper, we consider the episodic Markov decision process3 (MDP) M =
157
+ (S, A, P, r, H, ρ) [Puterman, 2014]. The first two elements S and A are the state and action space, respectively.
158
+ H is the maximum length of a trajectory and ρ is the initial state distribution. P = {P1, · · · , PH} specifies
159
+ the non-stationary transition function of this MDP; concretely, Ph(sh+1|sh, ah) determines the probability of
160
+ transiting to state sh+1 conditioned on state sh and action ah in time step h, for h ∈ [H], where the symbol
161
+ [x] means the set of integers from 1 to x. Similarly, r = {r1, · · · , rH} is the reward function, and we assume
162
+ rh : S × A → [0, 1], for h ∈ [H]. A time-dependent policy is πh : S → ∆(A), where ∆(A) is the probability
163
+ simplex. πh(a|s) gives the probability of selecting action a on state s in time step h, for h ∈ [H]. When the
164
+ context is clear, we simply use π to denote the collection of time-dependent policies {πh}H
165
+ h=1.
166
+ We measure the quality of a policy π by the policy value (i.e., environment-specific long-term return):
167
+ V(π) = E
168
+
169
+ ∑H
170
+ h=1 r(sh, ah) | s1 ∼ ρ; ah ∼ πh(·|sh), sh+1 ∼ Ph(·|sh, ah), ∀h ∈ [H]
171
+
172
+ . To facilitate later analysis,
173
+ we need to introduce the state-action distribution dπ
174
+ h (s, a):
175
+
176
+ h (s, a) = P
177
+
178
+ sh = s, ah = a | s1 ∼ ρ; aℓ ∼ π(·|sℓ), sℓ+1 ∼ Pℓ(·|sℓ, aℓ), ∀ℓ ∈ [h]
179
+
180
+ .
181
+ Here, we use the convention that dπ is the collection of all time-dependent state-action distributions.
182
+ Sometimes, we need to consider the state distribution dπ(s), which shares the same definition with dπ(s, a)
183
+ except that we only compute the probability of visiting a specific state s. It is easy to see that dπ
184
+ h (s) =
185
+ ∑a dπ
186
+ h (s, a), ∀h ∈ [H].
187
+ Imitation Learning. The goal of imitation learning is to learn a high quality policy directly from expert
188
+ demonstrations. To this end, we often assume there is a nearly optimal expert policy πE that could interact
189
+ with the environment to generate a dataset (i.e., NE trajectories of length H):
190
+ DE =
191
+
192
+ tr = (s1, a1, s2, a2, · · · , sH, aH) ; s1 ∼ ρ, ah ∼ πE
193
+ h (·|sh), sh+1 ∼ Ph(·|sh, ah), ∀h ∈ [H]
194
+
195
+ .
196
+ Then, the learner can use DE to mimic the expert. From a theoretical perspective, the quality of imitation
197
+ is measured by the imitation gap: E
198
+
199
+ V(πE) − V(π)
200
+
201
+ , where π is the learned policy and the expectation is
202
+ taken over the randomness of DE. We hope that a good learner can mimic the expert perfectly and thus the
203
+ imitation gap is small. In this paper, we assume that the expert policy is deterministic, which is common in
204
+ the literature [Rajaraman et al., 2020, 2021, Xu et al., 2020, 2021b]. Note that this assumption holds for tasks
205
+ including MuJoCo locomotion control.
206
+ Behavioral Cloning. Given an expert dataset DE, the behavioral cloning (BC) algorithm takes the
207
+ maximum likelihood estimation:
208
+ πBC ∈ max
209
+ π
210
+ H
211
+
212
+ h=1
213
+
214
+ (s,a)∈S×A
215
+
216
+ dE
217
+ h(s, a) log πh(a|s),
218
+ (1)
219
+ where �
220
+ dE
221
+ h(s, a) is the empirical state-action distribution. By definition, �
222
+ dE
223
+ h(s, a) = nE
224
+ h(s, a)/NE, where nE
225
+ h(s, a)
226
+ refers to the number of expert trajectories such that their state-action pairs are equal to (s, a) in time step h.
227
+ In the tabular case, a closed-formed solution to Equation (1) is available:
228
+ πBC
229
+ h (a|s) =
230
+
231
+
232
+
233
+ nE
234
+ h(s,a)
235
+ nE
236
+ h(s)
237
+ if nE
238
+ h(s) > 0
239
+ 1
240
+ |A|
241
+ otherwise
242
+ (2)
243
+ where nE
244
+ h(s) ≜ ∑a′ nE
245
+ h(s, a′). For visited states, BC can make good decisions by duplicating expert actions.
246
+ However, BC has limited knowledge about the expert actions on non-visited states. As a result, it may suffer
247
+ a large imitation gap when making a wrong decision on a non-visited state, leading to compounding errors
248
+ [Ross and Bagnell, 2010].
249
+ Imitation with Supplementary Dataset. BC will fail when the number of expert trajectories is small due
250
+ 3Our results can be translated to the discounted and infinite-horizon MDP setting. We consider the episodic MDP because it allows a
251
+ simple way of dealing with the statistical estimation.
252
+ 4
253
+
254
+ to the mentioned compounding errors issue. A naive solution is to collect more expert trajectories. In this
255
+ paper, we follow an alternative and emergent framework in [Kim et al., 2022b, Xu et al., 2022a], where we
256
+ assume that an offline supplementary dataset DS (i.e., NS trajectories of length H) is relatively cheap to obtain:
257
+ DS =
258
+
259
+ tr = (s1, a1, s2, a2, · · · , sH, aH) ; s1 ∼ ρ, ah ∼ πβ
260
+ h(·|sh), sh+1 ∼ Ph(·|sh, ah), ∀h ∈ [H]
261
+
262
+ ,
263
+ where πβ is a behavioral policy that could be a mixture of certain base policies, i.e., πβ = ∑K
264
+ i=1 αiπi with
265
+ ∑K
266
+ i=1 αi = 1 and αi ≥ 0 for i ∈ [K]. Algorithms can additionally leverage this supplementary dataset to
267
+ mitigate the compounding errors issue.
268
+ 4
269
+ Analysis of Naive Behavior Cloning with Union Dataset
270
+ In this section, we consider a direct extension of BC for the problem of offline imitation with a supplementary
271
+ dataset. Specifically, this algorithm called NBCU (naive BC with the union dataset) performs the maximum
272
+ likelihood estimation on the union of the expert and supplementary datasets:
273
+ πNBCU ∈ argmax
274
+ π
275
+ H
276
+
277
+ h=1 ∑
278
+ (s,a)
279
+
280
+ dU
281
+ h (s, a) log πh(a|s),
282
+ (3)
283
+ where DU = DS ∪ DE and �
284
+ dU
285
+ h (s, a) is the empirical state-action distribution estimated from DU
286
+ h (i.e., the
287
+ subset of DU in step h). As an analogue to Equation (2), we have
288
+ πNBCU
289
+ h
290
+ (a|s) =
291
+
292
+
293
+
294
+ nU
295
+ h (s,a)
296
+ nU
297
+ h (s)
298
+ if nU
299
+ h (s) > 0
300
+ 1
301
+ |A|
302
+ otherwise
303
+ (4)
304
+ where, just like before, nU
305
+ h (s, a) refers to the number of union trajectories such that their state-action pairs are
306
+ equal to (s, a) in time step h. To analyze NBCU, we pose an assumption about the dataset collection.
307
+ Algorithm 1 NBCU
308
+ Input: Expert dataset DE and supplementary dataset DS.
309
+ 1: DU ← DE ∪ DS.
310
+ 2: Apply BC to learn a policy π by objective (3) with DU.
311
+ Assumption 1. The supplementary dataset DS and expert dataset DE are collected in the following way: each time,
312
+ we roll-out a behavior policy πβ with probability 1 − η and the expert policy with probability η, where η ∈ [0, 1]
313
+ controls the fraction of expert trajectories. Such an experiment is independent and identically conducted by Ntot times.
314
+ Under Assumption 1, we slightly overload our notations: let NE be the expected number of expert
315
+ trajectories, i.e., NE = ηNtot, and NS be the expected number of supplementary trajectories, i.e., NS =
316
+ (1 − η)Ntot.
317
+ 4.1
318
+ Baseline: BC on the Expert Dataset
319
+ To measure whether the supplementary dataset is helpful, we consider the BC only with the expert dataset as
320
+ a baseline. This approach has been analyzed in [Rajaraman et al., 2020], and we transfer their results under
321
+ our assumption4:
322
+ 4The proof of Theorem 1 builds on [Rajaraman et al., 2020] and the main difference is that the number of expert trajectories is a
323
+ random variable in our set-up. Technically, we handle this difficulty by Lemma 3 in Appendix.
324
+ 5
325
+
326
+ Theorem 1. Under Assumption 1. In the tabular case, if we apply BC only on the expert dataset, we have that5
327
+ E
328
+
329
+ V(πE) − V(πBC)
330
+
331
+ ≲ min
332
+
333
+ H, |S|H2
334
+ NE
335
+
336
+ ,
337
+ where the expectation is taken over the randomness in the dataset collection.
338
+ Proofs of all theoretical results are deferred to the Appendix.
339
+ 4.2
340
+ Main Results of NBCU
341
+ Now, we present our main claim about NBCU.
342
+ Theorem 2. Under Assumption 1. In the tabular case, for any η ∈ (0, 1], we have
343
+ E
344
+
345
+ V(πE) − V(πNBCU)
346
+
347
+ ≲ min
348
+
349
+ H, (1 − η)
350
+
351
+ V(πE) − V(πβ)
352
+
353
+ + |S|H2 log(Ntot)
354
+ Ntot
355
+
356
+ ,
357
+ where the expectation is taken over the randomness in the dataset collection.
358
+ We often have V(πE) − V(πβ) > 0, as the behavior policy is usually inferior to the expert policy. In this
359
+ case, even if Ntot is sufficiently large so that the second term is negligible, there still exists a positive gap
360
+ between V(πE) and V(πNBCU). Fundamentally, this is because the behavior policy may collect non-expert
361
+ actions, so the recovered policy may select a wrong action even on expert states, which results in bad
362
+ performance. The following theorem shows that the gap V(πE) − V(πβ) is inevitable in the worst case.
363
+ Proposition 1. Under Assumption 1. In the tabular case, there exists an MDP M, an expert policy πE and a behavior
364
+ policy πβ, for any η ∈ (0, 1], when Ntot ≳ |S|, we have
365
+ E
366
+
367
+ V(πE) − V(πNBCU)
368
+
369
+ ≳ (1 − η)
370
+
371
+ V(πE) − V(πβ)
372
+
373
+ ,
374
+ where the expectation is taken over the randomness in the dataset collection.
375
+ The construction of the hard instance in Proposition 1 is based on the following intuition: NBCU does
376
+ not distinguish the action labels in the union dataset and treats them equally important; see Equation (4).
377
+ Therefore, NBCU will learn bad decisions and suffer a non-vanishing gap when the dataset has a bad
378
+ state-action coverage (i.e., primarily, action labels on the expert states are sub-optimal).
379
+ 4.3
380
+ Positive Results of NBCU
381
+ The previous results suggest that NBCU is not warranted to be better than BC. For some special cases
382
+ (depending on the dataset coverage), however, we can bypass the hard instance in Proposition 1 and show
383
+ that NBCU can perform well. We state two representative results as follows.
384
+ Theorem 3. Under the same assumption with Theorem 2, additionally assume that πβ = πE. In the tabular case, for
385
+ any η ∈ [0, 1], we have
386
+ E
387
+
388
+ V(πE) − V(πNBCU)
389
+
390
+ ≲ min
391
+
392
+ H, |S|H2
393
+ Ntot
394
+
395
+ ,
396
+ where the expectation is taken over the randomness in the dataset collection.
397
+ Theorem 3 is a direct extension of Theorem 1. The condition πβ = πE seems strong. Still, it may
398
+ approximately hold in the following case: the supplementary dataset DS is collected by an online agent that
399
+ improves its performance over iterations, in which πβ is close to πE asymptotically.
400
+ 5a(n) ≲ b(n) means that there exist C, n0 > 0 such that a(n) ≤ Cb(n) for all n ≥ n0. In our context, n usually refers to the number of
401
+ trajectories.
402
+ 6
403
+
404
+ Theorem 4. Under the same assumption with Theorem 2, additionally assume that πβ never visits expert states, i.e.,
405
+ supp(dπβ
406
+ h (·)) ∩ supp(dπE
407
+ h (·)) = ∅6 for all h ∈ [H]. In the tabular case, for any η ∈ (0, 1], we have
408
+ E
409
+
410
+ V(πE) − V(πNBCU)
411
+
412
+ ≲ min
413
+
414
+ H, |S|H2
415
+ NE
416
+
417
+ ,
418
+ (5)
419
+ where the expectation is taken over the randomness in the dataset collection.
420
+ It is commonly believed that noisy demonstrations are harmful to performance [Sasaki and Yamashina,
421
+ 2021]. Nevertheless, Theorem 4 provides a condition in which BC is robust to noisy samples. Technically,
422
+ this robustness property stems from the theoretical analysis that only states along the expert trajectory are
423
+ significant for the imitation gap, and noisy actions on the non-expert states do not contribute.
424
+ Summary. Our results demonstrate that without a special design, the naive application of BC on the
425
+ union dataset is not guaranteed to be better than BC. However, good results may happen if the dataset
426
+ coverage is nice, suggesting that noisy demonstrations are not the monster in all cases. Please refer to Table 1
427
+ for a summary.
428
+ Table 1: Effects of state-action attributes of samples for NBCU. “” indicates a helpful sample, “” indicates
429
+ a harmful sample, and “” means something in between.
430
+ Expert state
431
+ Non-expert state
432
+ Expert action
433
+ 
434
+ 
435
+ Non-expert action
436
+ 
437
+ 
438
+ Connection with Experiments. From Figure 1, we already see two interesting phenomena: 1) NBCU
439
+ is worse than BC for the noisy expert task; 2) NBCU is much better than BC for the full replay task. We
440
+ use our theory to interpret these results. First, for the noisy expert task, our experiment setting (refer to
441
+ Appendix D.1 for details) ensures that the supplementary dataset has noisy demonstrations on expert states,
442
+ following the idea in Proposition 1. In this case, Theorem 2 predicts that NBCU is no better than BC. Second,
443
+ for the full replay task, we remark that the replay buffer contains lots of expert-level trajectories (refer to
444
+ Figure 5 in Appendix which shows that the online SAC converges to the expert-level performance quickly).
445
+ Therefore, the dataset coverage is good in this scenario and Theorem 3 and Theorem 4 can explain the good
446
+ performance of NBCU.
447
+ 5
448
+ Analysis of Weighted Behavioral Cloning with Union Dataset
449
+ In this section, we explore an alternative approach to leverage the expert and supplementary datasets.
450
+ In light of [Kim et al., 2022b, Xu et al., 2022a], a discriminator is trained to score samples, upon which a
451
+ weighted BC objective is used for policy optimization:
452
+ πWBCU ∈ argmax
453
+ π
454
+ H
455
+
456
+ h=1
457
+
458
+ (s,a)∈S×A
459
+
460
+
461
+ dU
462
+ h (s, a) × [wh(s, a) log πh(a|s)] × I [wh(s, a) ≥ δ]
463
+
464
+ ,
465
+ (6)
466
+ where �
467
+ dU
468
+ h (s, a) is the empirical state-action distribution estimated from DU
469
+ h , wh(s, a) ∈ [0, ∞) is the weight
470
+ decided by the discriminator, and δ ∈ [0, ∞) is a hyper-parameter. We point out that δ is introduced for
471
+ theoretical analysis, and in practice we set δ = 0. We call this approach WBCU (weighted BC with the union
472
+ dataset).
473
+ Our key idea is the importance sampling technique [Shapiro, 2003, Chapter 9], which can transfer samples
474
+ in the union dataset under the expert policy distribution. In this way, WBCU is expected to address the
475
+ failure mode of NBCU. We elaborate on this point as follows. In the population level (i.e., there are infinitely
476
+ samples), we would have �
477
+ dU
478
+ h = dU
479
+ h , which is jointly determined by the expert policy and the behavioral
480
+ 6For a distribution p, supp(p) = {x : p(x) ̸= 0}.
481
+ 7
482
+
483
+ policy. In this case, if wh(s, a) = dE
484
+ h(s, a)/dU
485
+ h (s, a), we would have �
486
+ dU
487
+ h (s, a)wh(s, a) = dE
488
+ h(s, a). Accordingly,
489
+ the objective (6) is to learn a policy as if samples were collected by the expert policy. In practice, dE
490
+ h(s, a) and
491
+ dU
492
+ h (s, a) are unknown; instead, we only have finite samples from these two distributions. Therefore, we need
493
+ to estimate the grounded importance sampling ratio dE
494
+ h(s, a)/dU
495
+ h (s, a).
496
+ We emphasize that a simple two-step idea—first estimating dE
497
+ h(s, a) and dU
498
+ h (s, a) separately and then
499
+ calculating their quotient—is intractable. This is because it is difficult to accurately estimate the probability
500
+ density of high-dimensional distributions. Following the seminal idea in [Goodfellow et al., 2014], we take a
501
+ one-step approach: we directly train a discriminator to estimate dE
502
+ h(s, a)/dU
503
+ h (s, a). Concretely, we consider
504
+ time-dependent parameterized discriminators {ch : S × A → (0, 1)}H
505
+ h=1, each of which has an objective
506
+ max
507
+ ch
508
+
509
+ (s,a)∈S×A
510
+
511
+ dE
512
+ h(s, a) [log (ch(s, a))] +
513
+
514
+ (s,a)∈S×A
515
+
516
+ dU
517
+ h (s, a) [log (1 − ch(s, a))] .
518
+ (7)
519
+ The above problem amounts to training a binary classifier (i.e., the logistic regression). In the population
520
+ level, with the first-order optimality condition, we have
521
+ c⋆
522
+ h(s, a) =
523
+ dE
524
+ h(s, a)
525
+ dE
526
+ h(s, a) + dU
527
+ h (s, a).
528
+ (8)
529
+ Then, we can obtain the importance sampling ratio dE
530
+ h(s, a)/dU
531
+ h (s, a) in the following way:
532
+ wh(s, a) =
533
+ c⋆
534
+ h(s, a)
535
+ 1 − c⋆
536
+ h(s, a).
537
+ (9)
538
+ Based on the above discussion, we outline the implementation of the proposed method WBCU in Algorithm 2.
539
+ Algorithm 2 WBCU
540
+ Input: Expert dataset DE and supplementary dataset DS.
541
+ 1: DU ← DE ∪ DS.
542
+ 2: Train a binary classifier c by objective (7) with DE and DU.
543
+ 3: Compute the importance sampling ratio w by Equation (9).
544
+ 4: Apply BC to learn a policy π by objective (6) with DU.
545
+ Remark 1. The weighting rule of WBCU is unbiased in the sense that WBCU directly estimates the importance
546
+ sampling ratio, while prior methods in [Kim et al., 2022b, Xu et al., 2022a] use biased/regularized weighting rules. As
547
+ byproducts, WBCU has fewer hyper-parameters to tune.
548
+ First, DemoDICE also implements the policy learning objective (6), but DemoDICE uses the weighting rule
549
+ �w(s, a) ∝ d⋆(s, a)/dU(s, a) (refer to the formula between Equations (19)-(20) in [Kim et al., 2022b]), where d⋆ is
550
+ computed by a regularized state-action distribution objective (refer to [Kim et al., 2022b, Equations (5)-(7)])7:
551
+ d⋆ = argmin
552
+ d
553
+ DKL(d∥dE) + αDKL(d∥dU)
554
+ s.t.
555
+ d(s, a) ≥ 0
556
+ ∀s, a.
557
+
558
+ a
559
+ d(s, a) = (1 − γ)ρ(s) + γ ∑
560
+ s′,a′
561
+ P(s|s′, a′)d(s′, a′)
562
+ ∀s.
563
+ where γ ∈ [0, 1) is the discount factor, α > 0 is a hyper-parameter. Due to the regularized term in the objective and the
564
+ Bellman flow constraint, we have d⋆ ̸= dE.
565
+ 7For a moment, we use the notations in [Kim et al., 2022b] and present their results under the stationary and infinite-horizon MDPs.
566
+ Same as the discussion of DWBC [Xu et al., 2022a].
567
+ 8
568
+
569
+ 9
570
+ Discriminative Learning
571
+ Expert Sample
572
+ Supplementary Sample
573
+ (Mode 1)
574
+ Supplementary Sample
575
+ (Mode 2)
576
+ Decision Boundary
577
+ (by )¯θ
578
+ Decision Boundary
579
+ (by
580
+ )
581
+ θ⋆
582
+ Figure 2: Illustration for the learning scheme of WBCU under Assumption 2.
583
+ Second, DWBC considers a different policy learning objective (refer to [Xu et al., 2022a, Equation (17)]):
584
+ min
585
+ π
586
+ α
587
+
588
+ (s,a)∈DE
589
+ [− log π(a|s)] −
590
+
591
+ (s,a)∈DE
592
+
593
+ − log π(a|s) ·
594
+ λ
595
+ c(1 − c)
596
+
597
+ +
598
+
599
+ (s,a)∈DS
600
+
601
+ − log π(a|s) ·
602
+ 1
603
+ 1 − c
604
+
605
+ ,
606
+ (10)
607
+ where α > 0, λ > 0 are hyper-parameters, and c is the output of the discriminator that is jointly trained with π (refer
608
+ to [Xu et al., 2022a, Equation (8)]):
609
+ min
610
+ c
611
+ λ
612
+
613
+ (s,a)∈DE
614
+ [− log c(s, a, log π(a|s))] +
615
+
616
+ (s,a)∈DS
617
+ [− log(1 − c(s, a, log π(a|s)))]
618
+ − λ
619
+
620
+ (s,a)∈DE
621
+ [− log(1 − c(s, a, log π(a|s)))] .
622
+ Since its input additionally incorporates log π, the discriminator is not guaranteed to estimate the state-action
623
+ distribution. Thus, the weighting in Equation (10) loses a connection with the importance sampling ratio.
624
+ Experiments in Figure 1 show that WBCU simultaneously works well on the noisy expert and full replay
625
+ tasks, while prior methods like DemoDICE and DWBC perform well only on one of them. We believe the
626
+ discussion in Remark 1 can partially explain the empirical observation. Next, we investigate the theoretical
627
+ foundation of WBCU.
628
+ 5.1
629
+ Negative Result of WBCU With Tabular Representation
630
+ In this section, we consider parameterizing the discriminator c by a huge table (i.e., a vector with dimension
631
+ |S||A|). We present a surprising counter-intuitive result.
632
+ Proposition 2. In the tabular case (with δ = 0), we have πWBCU = πBC.
633
+ Proposition 2 shows that even if we have a large number of supplementary samples and even if we use
634
+ the importance sampling, WBCU is not guaranteed to outperform BC, based on the tabular representation.
635
+ We highlight that this failure mode is because the discriminator has no extrapolation ability in this case.
636
+ Specifically, for an expert-style sample (s, a) that only appears in the supplementary dataset, we have
637
+
638
+ dE
639
+ h(s, a) = 0 and �
640
+ dU
641
+ h (s, a) > 0, so c⋆
642
+ h(s, a) = �
643
+ dE
644
+ h(s, a)/(�
645
+ dE
646
+ h(s, a) + �
647
+ dU
648
+ h (s, a)) = 0. That is, such a good sample
649
+ does not contribute to the learning objective (6). Intuitively, the tabular representation simply treats samples
650
+ in a discrete way, which ignores the correlation between samples.
651
+ 9
652
+
653
+ 5.2
654
+ Positive Result of WBCU With Function Approximation
655
+ To bypass the hurdle in the previous section, we investigate WBCU with certain function approximation in
656
+ this section. To avoid the tabular/discrete representation, we will consider “smooth” function approximators,
657
+ which can model the internal correlation between samples. Specifically, we consider the discriminator to be
658
+ parameterized by
659
+ ch(s, a; θh) =
660
+ 1
661
+ 1 + exp(−⟨φh(s, a), θh⟩),
662
+ (11)
663
+ where φh(s, a) ∈ Rd is the feature vector (that can be learned by neural networks), and θh ∈ Rd is the
664
+ parameter to train. Accordingly, the optimization problem becomes:
665
+ min
666
+ θh
667
+ Lh(θh) ≜
668
+
669
+
670
+ (s,a)
671
+
672
+ dE
673
+ h(s, a) [log (1 + exp (−⟨φh(s, a), θh⟩))] + ∑
674
+ (s,a)
675
+
676
+ dU
677
+ h (s, a) [log (1 + exp (⟨φh(s, a), θh⟩))]
678
+
679
+ .
680
+ (12)
681
+ Let θ⋆ = {θ⋆
682
+ 1, · · · , θ⋆
683
+ H} be the optimal solution obtained from Equation (12). Due to the side information in
684
+ the feature, samples are no longer treated independently, and the discriminator can perform a structured
685
+ estimation. We clarify that to be consistent with the previous results, the policy is still based on the tabular
686
+ representation. We discuss the general function approximation of policy in Appendix C.
687
+ Since c⋆ is no longer analytic as in Equation (8), a natural question is: what can we say about it? Our
688
+ intuition is stated as follows. Let DS
689
+ h denote the set of samples in step h in DS. Since the behavior policy
690
+ that collects DS
691
+ h is diverse, we can imagine DS
692
+ h contains two modes of samples: some of them actually are
693
+ also collected by the expert policy while others are not. In the former case, we expect that wh(s, a) is large
694
+ so that �
695
+ dU
696
+ h (s, a)wh(s, a) ≈ 1, indicating such a sample (s, a) is likely collected by the expert. In the latter
697
+ case, we hope the discriminator can predict wh with a small value so that �
698
+ dU
699
+ h (s, a)wh(s, a) ≈ 0, indicating
700
+ it is a non-expert sample. Notice that wh is monotone with respect to the inner product ⟨φh(s, a), θ⟩; refer
701
+ to Equations (9)(11). Therefore, we conclude that a larger ⟨φh(s, a), θ⟩ means a significant contribution
702
+ to the learning objective (6). Next, we demonstrate that the above intuition can be achieved under mild
703
+ assumptions.
704
+ Assumption 2 (Linear Separability). Let DS = DS,1 ∪ DS,2 and DS,1 ∩ DS,2 = ∅, where DS,1 is collected by the
705
+ expert policy and DS,2 is collected by a sub-optimal policy (but the algorithm does not know this split). For each time
706
+ step h ∈ [H], there exists a ground truth parameter ¯θh ∈ Rd, for any (s, a) ∈ DE
707
+ h ∪ DS,1
708
+ h
709
+ and (s′, a′) ∈ DS,2
710
+ h , it holds
711
+ that
712
+ ⟨ ¯θh, φh(s, a)⟩ > 0, ⟨ ¯θh, φh(s′, a′)⟩ < 0.
713
+ Readers may realize that Assumption 2 is closely related to the notion of “margin” in the classification
714
+ problem. Define
715
+ ∆h(θ) ≜
716
+
717
+ min
718
+ (s,a)∈DE
719
+ h ∪DS,1
720
+ h
721
+ ⟨θ, φh(s, a)⟩ −
722
+ max
723
+ (s′,a′)∈DS,2
724
+ h
725
+ ⟨θ, φh(s′, a′)⟩
726
+
727
+ .
728
+ From Assumption 2, we have ∆h( ¯θh) > 0. This means that there exists a classifier that recognizes samples
729
+ from both DE
730
+ h and DS,1
731
+ h
732
+ as “good” samples, which contributes to the objective (6). On the other hand, samples
733
+ from DS,2
734
+ h
735
+ will be classified as “bad” samples, which do not matter for the learned policy. Note that such
736
+ a nice classifier is assumed to exist, which is not identical to what is learned via Equation (12). Next, we
737
+ theoretically control the (parameter) distance between two classifiers.
738
+ Before further discussion, we note that ¯θh is not unique if it exists. Without loss of generality, we define
739
+ ¯θh as that can achieve the maximum margin (among all unit vectors8). To theoretically characterize the
740
+ 8Otherwise, the margin is unbounded by multiplying ¯θh with a positive scalar.
741
+ 10
742
+
743
+ movement of θ⋆, we first characterize the landscape properties (e.g., Lipschitz continuity and quadratic
744
+ growth conditions9) of ∆h and Lh(θ) in Lemma 1 and Lemma 2, respectively.
745
+ Lemma 1 (Lipschitz Continuity). For any θ ∈ Rd, the margin function is Lh-Lipschitz continuous in the sense that
746
+ ∆h( ¯θh) − ∆h(θ) ≤ Lh
747
+ �� ¯θh − θ
748
+ �� ,
749
+ where Lh =
750
+ ��φh(s1, a1) − φh(s2, a2)
751
+ �� with (s1, a1) ∈ argmin(s,a)∈DE
752
+ h ∪DS,1
753
+ h ⟨θ, φh(s, a)⟩ and (s2, a2) ∈
754
+ argmax(s,a)∈DS,2
755
+ h ⟨θ, φh(s, a)⟩.
756
+ Lemma 2 (Quadratic Growth). For any h, let Ah ∈ RNtot×d be the matrix that aggregates the feature vectors of
757
+ samples in DU
758
+ h . Consider the under-parameterization case that rank(Ah) = d. There exists τh > 0 such that
759
+ Lh(θh) ≥ Lh(θ⋆
760
+ h) + τh
761
+ 2
762
+ ��θh − θ⋆
763
+ h
764
+ ��2 .
765
+ Theorem 5. Under Assumption 2, for any h ∈ [H], if the following inequality holds
766
+
767
+ 2
768
+ �Lh( ¯θh) − Lh(θ⋆
769
+ h)
770
+
771
+ τh
772
+ < ∆h( ¯θh)
773
+ Lh
774
+ ,
775
+ (13)
776
+ then we have ∆h(θ⋆
777
+ h) > 0.
778
+ To interpret Theorem 5, we note that ∆h(θ⋆
779
+ h) > 0 means that the learned discriminator can perfectly
780
+ distinguish the good samples (from DE
781
+ h and DS,1
782
+ h ) and bad samples (from DS,2
783
+ h ). In other words, if the feature
784
+ design is nice such that Inequality (13) holds, then the obtained classifier can still maintain the decision
785
+ results by ¯θ; refer to Figure 2 for illustration. Consequently, all samples from DE
786
+ h and DS,1
787
+ h
788
+ are assigned large
789
+ weights. In this way, WBCU can leverage additional samples to outperform BC. Technically, ∆h(θ⋆
790
+ h) > 0
791
+ means that there exists a δ > 0 such that we have wh(s, a) > δ for (s, a) ∈ DE
792
+ h ∪ DS,1
793
+ h
794
+ and wh(s, a) < δ for
795
+ (s, a) ∈ DS,2
796
+ h . As such, WBCU can utilize the good samples DS,1
797
+ h
798
+ and eliminate the bad samples DS,2
799
+ h
800
+ in theory.
801
+ The detailed imitation gap bound depends on the number of trajectories in DE ∪ DS,1, and this result is
802
+ straightforward, so we omit details here.
803
+ Readers may ask whether inequality (13) can hold in practice. This question is hard to answer because
804
+ the coefficient τh and Lh are data-dependent. Nevertheless, we can provide a toy example to illustrate that
805
+ inequality (13) holds and give a sharp condition for d = 1; please refer to Appendix B for details. Further
806
+ relaxation of the condition and assumption is left for future work.
807
+ Summary. Our theoretical analysis (Proposition 2 and Theorem 5) discloses that the “smooth” function
808
+ approximation is inevitable to achieve satisfying performance. For practitioners, our results would suggest
809
+ that regularization techniques that control the smooth property of the function approximators may improve
810
+ the performance, which we empirically verify below.
811
+ Additional Experiments. We note that quite often, non-linear neural networks rather than linear func-
812
+ tions are used in practice. For neural networks, the gradient penalty (GP) regularization10 is known to control
813
+ the Lipschitz continuous property of the discriminator [Gulrajani et al., 2017]. In particular, a large gradient
814
+ penalty loss can push the discriminator to prefer 1-Lipschitz continuous functions that are “smooth”. With
815
+ the same set-up with experiments in Figure 1, we show that the gradient penalty is crucial for the practical
816
+ performance of WBCU; see Figure 3. A similar phenomenon is also observed for the related algorithm
817
+ DemoDICE; see Figure 6 in Appendix.
818
+ 6
819
+ Conclusion
820
+ We theoretically explore imitation learning with a supplementary dataset, and empirical results corroborate
821
+ our findings. While our results have several desirable features, they also have shortcomings. One limitation
822
+ 9These terminologies are from the optimization literature (see, e.g., [Karimi et al., 2016, Drusvyatskiy and Lewis, 2018]).
823
+ 10This technique adds a squared loss of the gradient norm to the original loss function; see Appendix D.1 for details.
824
+ 11
825
+
826
+ Noisy Expert
827
+ Full Replay
828
+ Task
829
+ 0
830
+ 20
831
+ 40
832
+ 60
833
+ 80
834
+ Normalized Score (%)
835
+ 30
836
+ 6
837
+ 64
838
+ 94
839
+ 57
840
+ 93
841
+ Algorithm
842
+ WBCU(GP=0)
843
+ WBCU(GP=1)
844
+ WBCU(GP=10)
845
+ Figure 3: Averaged normalized scores of trained policies of WBCU with gradient penalty (GP). Numbers in
846
+ the legend indicate the scale of the GP regularization.
847
+ is that we consider the tabular representation in policy learning. However, our theoretical implications may
848
+ remain unchanged if function approximation is used. Please see Appendix C for discussion, which deserves
849
+ further investigation.
850
+ Exploring more applications of NBCU and WBCU is an interesting future work. For example, for large
851
+ language models [Radford et al., 2018], we may have massive supplementary samples from the Web, while
852
+ examples with human annotations are limited. Compared with the existing reinforcement-learning-based
853
+ methods (see, e.g., [Stiennon et al., 2020]), training good policies may be easier and more efficient by the
854
+ developed imitation learning approaches.
855
+ Acknowledgements
856
+ Ziniu Li would like to thank Yushun Zhang, Yingru Li, Jiancong Xiao, and Dmitry Rybin for reading the
857
+ manuscript and providing valuable comments. Tian Xu would like to thank Fanming Luo, Zhilong Zhang,
858
+ and Jingcheng Pang for reading the manuscript and providing helpful comments. Ziniu Li appreciates the
859
+ helpful discussion with Congliang Chen about a technical lemma.
860
+ References
861
+ A. Agarwal, S. Kakade, A. Krishnamurthy, and W. Sun. Flambe: Structural complexity and representation
862
+ learning of low rank mdps. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33, pages 20095–20107, 2020.
863
+ B. D. Argall, S. Chernova, M. Veloso, and B. Browning. A survey of robot learning from demonstration.
864
+ Robotics and autonomous systems, 57(5):469–483, 2009.
865
+ S. Boyd, S. P. Boyd, and L. Vandenberghe. Convex optimization. Cambridge university press, 2004.
866
+ D. Brown, W. Goo, P. Nagarajan, and S. Niekum. Extrapolating beyond suboptimal demonstrations via
867
+ inverse reinforcement learning from observations. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on
868
+ Machine Learning, pages 783–792, 2019.
869
+ S. Diamond and S. Boyd. CVXPY: A Python-embedded modeling language for convex optimization. Journal
870
+ of Machine Learning Research, 17(83):1–5, 2016.
871
+ D. Drusvyatskiy and A. S. Lewis. Error bounds, quadratic growth, and linear convergence of proximal
872
+ methods. Mathematics of Operations Research, 43(3):919–948, 2018.
873
+ 12
874
+
875
+ S. K. S. Ghasemipour, R. S. Zemel, and S. Gu. A divergence minimization perspective on imitation learning
876
+ methods. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference on Robot Learning, pages 1259–1277, 2019.
877
+ I. J. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. C. Courville, and Y. Bengio.
878
+ Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27, pages 2672–2680, 2014.
879
+ I. Gulrajani, F. Ahmed, M. Arjovsky, V. Dumoulin, and A. C. Courville. Improved training of wasserstein
880
+ gans. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, pages 5767–5777, 2017.
881
+ T. Haarnoja, A. Zhou, P. Abbeel, and S. Levine. Soft actor-critic: Off-policy maximum entropy deep
882
+ reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine
883
+ Learning, pages 1856–1865, 2018.
884
+ J. Ho and S. Ermon. Generative adversarial imitation learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing
885
+ Systems 29, pages 4565–4573, 2016.
886
+ S. M. Kakade and J. Langford. Approximately optimal approximate reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of
887
+ the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 267–274, 2002.
888
+ H. Karimi, J. Nutini, and M. Schmidt. Linear convergence of gradient and proximal-gradient methods
889
+ under the polyak-łojasiewicz condition. In Proceeddings of The European Conference on Machine Learning and
890
+ Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pages 795–811, 2016.
891
+ G.-H. Kim, J. Lee, Y. Jang, H. Yang, and K.-E. Kim. Lobsdice: Offline imitation learning from observation via
892
+ stationary distribution correction estimation. arXiv, 2202.13536, 2022a.
893
+ G.-H. Kim, S. Seo, J. Lee, W. Jeon, H. Hwang, H. Yang, and K.-E. Kim. DemoDICE: Offline imitation learning
894
+ with supplementary imperfect demonstrations. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Learning
895
+ Representations, 2022b.
896
+ I. Kostrikov, K. K. Agrawal, D. Dwibedi, S. Levine, and J. Tompson. Discriminator-actor-critic: Addressing
897
+ sample inefficiency and reward bias in adversarial imitation learning. In Proceedings of the 7th International
898
+ Conference on Learning Representations, 2019.
899
+ Z. Li, T. Xu, Y. Yu, and Z.-Q. Luo. Rethinking valuedice: Does it really improve performance?
900
+ arXiv,
901
+ 2202.02468, 2022.
902
+ L. Liu, Z. Tang, L. Li, and D. Luo. Robust imitation learning from corrupted demonstrations. arXiv,
903
+ 2201.12594, 2022.
904
+ Y. J. Ma, A. Shen, D. Jayaraman, and O. Bastani. Smodice: Versatile offline imitation learning via state
905
+ occupancy matching. In Prooceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 14639–
906
+ 14663, 2022.
907
+ T. Osa, J. Pajarinen, G. Neumann, J. A. Bagnell, P. Abbeel, and J. Peters. An algorithmic perspective on
908
+ imitation learning. Foundations and Trends in Robotic, 7(1-2):1–179, 2018.
909
+ D. Pomerleau. Efficient training of artificial neural networks for autonomous navigation. Neural Computation,
910
+ 3(1):88–97, 1991.
911
+ M. L. Puterman. Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming. John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
912
+ A. Radford, K. Narasimhan, T. Salimans, I. Sutskever, et al. Improving language understanding by generative
913
+ pre-training. 2018.
914
+ N. Rajaraman, L. F. Yang, J. Jiao, and K. Ramchandran. Toward the fundamental limits of imitation learning.
915
+ In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33, pages 2914–2924, 2020.
916
+ 13
917
+
918
+ N. Rajaraman, Y. Han, L. Yang, J. Liu, J. Jiao, and K. Ramchandran. On the value of interaction and
919
+ function approximation in imitation learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34,
920
+ pages 1325–1336, 2021.
921
+ S. Ross and D. Bagnell. Efficient reductions for imitation learning. In Proceedings of the 13rd International
922
+ Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 661–668, 2010.
923
+ F. Sasaki and R. Yamashina. Behavioral cloning from noisy demonstrations. In Proceedings of the 9th
924
+ International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
925
+ A. Shapiro. Monte carlo sampling methods. Handbooks in operations research and management science, 10:
926
+ 353–425, 2003.
927
+ J. Spencer, S. Choudhury, A. Venkatraman, B. Ziebart, and J. A. Bagnell. Feedback in imitation learning: The
928
+ three regimes of covariate shift. arXiv, 2102.02872, 2021.
929
+ N. Stiennon, L. Ouyang, J. Wu, D. Ziegler, R. Lowe, C. Voss, A. Radford, D. Amodei, and P. F. Christiano.
930
+ Learning to summarize with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33, pages
931
+ 3008–3021, 2020.
932
+ V. Tangkaratt, B. Han, M. E. Khan, and M. Sugiyama. Variational imitation learning with diverse-quality
933
+ demonstrations. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 9407–9417,
934
+ 2020.
935
+ Y. Wang, C. Xu, B. Du, and H. Lee. Learning to weight imperfect demonstrations. In Proceedings of the 38th
936
+ International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 10961–10970, 2021.
937
+ Y.-H. Wu, N. Charoenphakdee, H. Bao, V. Tangkaratt, and M. Sugiyama. Imitation learning from imperfect
938
+ demonstration. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 6818–6827,
939
+ 2019.
940
+ H. Xu, X. Zhan, H. Yin, and H. Qin. Discriminator-weighted offline imitation learning from suboptimal
941
+ demonstrations. In Prooceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 24725–24742,
942
+ 2022a.
943
+ T. Xu, Z. Li, and Y. Yu. Error bounds of imitating policies and environments. In Advances in Neural Information
944
+ Processing Systems 33, pages 15737–15749, 2020.
945
+ T. Xu, Z. Li, and Y. Yu. Error bounds of imitating policies and environments for reinforcement learning. IEEE
946
+ Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2021a.
947
+ T. Xu, Z. Li, and Y. Yu. More efficient adversarial imitation learning algorithms with known and unknown
948
+ transitions. arXiv, 2106.10424, 2021b.
949
+ T. Xu, Z. Li, Y. Yu, and Z.-Q. Luo. Understanding adversarial imitation learning in small sample regime: A
950
+ stage-coupled analysis. arXiv, 2208.01899, 2022b.
951
+ 14
952
+
953
+ A
954
+ Proof of Results in Section 4
955
+ Lemma 3. For any N ∈ N+ and p ∈ (0, 1), if the random variable X follows the binomial distribution, i.e.,
956
+ X ∼ Bin(N, p), then we have that
957
+ E
958
+
959
+ 1
960
+ X + 1
961
+
962
+
963
+ 1
964
+ Np.
965
+ Proof.
966
+ E
967
+
968
+ 1
969
+ X + 1
970
+
971
+ =
972
+ N
973
+
974
+ x=0
975
+
976
+ 1
977
+ x + 1
978
+
979
+ N!
980
+ x!(N − x)! px(1 − p)N−x
981
+ =
982
+ 1
983
+ (N + 1)p
984
+ N+1
985
+
986
+ x=1
987
+
988
+ (N + 1)!
989
+ x!(N + 1 − x)!
990
+
991
+ px(1 − p)N+1−x
992
+ =
993
+ 1
994
+ (N + 1)p
995
+
996
+ 1 − (1 − p)N+1�
997
+
998
+ 1
999
+ Np.
1000
+ A.1
1001
+ Proof of Theorem 1
1002
+ When |DE| ≥ 1, by [Rajaraman et al., 2020, Theorem 4.2], we have that
1003
+ V(πE) − EDE
1004
+
1005
+ V(πBC)
1006
+
1007
+ ≤ 4|S|H2
1008
+ 9|DE| .
1009
+ When |DE| = 0, we simply have that
1010
+ V(πE) − EDE
1011
+
1012
+ V(πBC)
1013
+
1014
+ ≤ H.
1015
+ Therefore, we have the following unified bound.
1016
+ V(πE) − EDE
1017
+
1018
+ V(πBC)
1019
+
1020
+
1021
+ |S|H2
1022
+ max{|DE|, 1} ≤ 2|S|H2
1023
+ |DE| + 1.
1024
+ The last inequality follows that max{x, 1} ≥ (x + 1)/2, ∀x ≥ 0. Finally, notice that |DE| ∼ Bin(Ntot, η). By
1025
+ Lemma 3, we have that
1026
+ V(πE) − E
1027
+
1028
+ V(πBC)
1029
+
1030
+ ≤ E
1031
+ � 2|S|H2
1032
+ |DE| + 1
1033
+
1034
+ ≤ 2|S|H2
1035
+ Ntotη
1036
+ = 2|S|H2
1037
+ NE
1038
+ ,
1039
+ which completes the proof.
1040
+ A.2
1041
+ Proof of Theorem 2
1042
+ For analysis, we first define the mixture state-action distribution as follows.
1043
+ dmix
1044
+ h
1045
+ (s, a) ≜ ηdπE
1046
+ h (s, a) + (1 − η)dπβ
1047
+ h (s, a), dmix
1048
+ h
1049
+ (s) ≜ ∑
1050
+ a∈A
1051
+ dmix
1052
+ h
1053
+ (s, a), ∀(s, a) ∈ S × A, ∀h ∈ [H].
1054
+ Note that in the population level, the marginal state-action distribution of union dataset DU in time step h is
1055
+ exactly dmix
1056
+ h
1057
+ . That is, dU
1058
+ h (s, a) = dmix
1059
+ h
1060
+ (s, a), ∀(s, a, h) ∈ S × A × [H]. Then we define the mixture policy πmix
1061
+ induced by dmix as follows.
1062
+ πmix
1063
+ h
1064
+ (a|s) =
1065
+
1066
+
1067
+
1068
+ dmix
1069
+ h
1070
+ (s,a)
1071
+ dmix
1072
+ h
1073
+ (s)
1074
+ if dmix
1075
+ h
1076
+ (s) > 0,
1077
+ 1
1078
+ |A|
1079
+ otherwise.
1080
+ ∀(s, a) ∈ S × A , ∀h ∈ [H].
1081
+ 15
1082
+
1083
+ From the theory of Markov Decision Processes, we know that (see, e.g., [Puterman, 2014])
1084
+ ∀h ∈ [H], ∀(s, a) ∈ S × A, dπmix
1085
+ h
1086
+ (s, a) = dmix
1087
+ h
1088
+ (s, a).
1089
+ Therefore, we can obtain that the marginal state-action distribution of union dataset DU in time step h is
1090
+ exactly dπmix
1091
+ h
1092
+ . Then we have the following decomposition.
1093
+ E
1094
+
1095
+ V(πE) − V(πNBCU)
1096
+
1097
+ = E
1098
+
1099
+ V(πE) − V(πmix) + V(πmix) − V(πNBCU)
1100
+
1101
+ = E
1102
+
1103
+ V(πE) − V(πmix)
1104
+
1105
+ + E
1106
+
1107
+ V(πmix) − V(πNBCU)
1108
+
1109
+ = V(πE) − V(πmix) + E
1110
+
1111
+ V(πmix) − V(πNBCU)
1112
+
1113
+ .
1114
+ For V(πE) − V(πmix), we have that
1115
+ V(πE) − V(πmix) =
1116
+ H
1117
+
1118
+ h=1
1119
+
1120
+ (s,a)∈S×A
1121
+
1122
+ dπE
1123
+ h (s, a) − dπmix
1124
+ h
1125
+ (s, a)
1126
+
1127
+ rh(s, a)
1128
+ =
1129
+ H
1130
+
1131
+ h=1
1132
+
1133
+ (s,a)∈S×A
1134
+
1135
+ dπE
1136
+ h (s, a) − dmix
1137
+ h
1138
+ (s, a)
1139
+
1140
+ rh(s, a)
1141
+ = (1 − η)
1142
+ H
1143
+
1144
+ h=1
1145
+
1146
+ (s,a)∈S×A
1147
+
1148
+ dπE
1149
+ h (s, a) − dπβ
1150
+ h (s, a)
1151
+
1152
+ rh(s, a)
1153
+ = (1 − η)
1154
+
1155
+ V(πE) − V(πβ)
1156
+
1157
+ .
1158
+ The last equation follows the dual formulation of policy value [Puterman, 2014]. Besides, notice that
1159
+ E
1160
+
1161
+ V(πmix) − V(πNBCU)
1162
+
1163
+ is exactly the imitation gap of BC when regarding πmix and DU as the expert
1164
+ policy and expert demonstrations, respectively. By [Rajaraman et al., 2020, Theorem 4.4], we have that
1165
+ E
1166
+
1167
+ V(πmix) − V(πNBCU)
1168
+
1169
+ ≲ |S|H2 log(Ntot)
1170
+ Ntot
1171
+ .
1172
+ Combining the above two equations yields that
1173
+ E
1174
+
1175
+ V(πE) − V(πNBCU)
1176
+
1177
+ ≲ (1 − η)
1178
+
1179
+ V(πE) − V(πβ)
1180
+
1181
+ + |S|H2 log(Ntot)
1182
+ Ntot
1183
+ .
1184
+ A.3
1185
+ Proof of Proposition 1
1186
+ We consider the instance named Standard Imitation in [Xu et al., 2021a]; see Figure 4. In Standard Imitation,
1187
+ each state is an absorbing state. In each state, only by taking the action a1, the agent can obtain the reward
1188
+ of 1. Otherwise, the agent obtains zero rewards. The initial state distribution is a uniform distribution, i.e.,
1189
+ ρ(s) = 1/|S|, ∀s ∈ S.
1190
+ 2
1191
+ Bandit
1192
+ 1
1193
+ · · ·
1194
+ |S|�1
1195
+ |S|
1196
+ 0
1197
+ 1
1198
+ 0
1199
+ 1
1200
+ 0
1201
+ 1
1202
+ 2
1203
+ �����������������
1204
+ �����������
1205
+ ������������
1206
+ �����������������
1207
+ Figure 4: The Standard Imitation MDP in [Xu et al., 2021a].
1208
+ We consider that the expert policy πE always takes the action a1 while the behavioral policy πβ always
1209
+ takes another action a2. Formally, πE
1210
+ h (a1|s) = 1, ∀s ∈ S, h ∈ [H], πβ
1211
+ h(a2|s) = 1, ∀s ∈ S, h ∈ [H]. It is
1212
+ direct to calculate that V(πE) = H and V(πβ) = 0. The supplementary dataset DS and the expert dataset
1213
+ DE are collected according to Assumption 1. The mixture state-action distribution can be calculated as
1214
+ 16
1215
+
1216
+ ∀s ∈ S, h ∈ [H],
1217
+ dmix
1218
+ h
1219
+ (s, a1) = ηdπE
1220
+ h (s, a1) + (1 − η)dπβ
1221
+ h (s, a1) = ηdπE
1222
+ h (s, a1) = ηρ(s),
1223
+ dmix
1224
+ h
1225
+ (s, a2) = ηdπE
1226
+ h (s, a2) + (1 − η)dπβ
1227
+ h (s, a2) = (1 − η)dπβ
1228
+ h (s, a2) = (1 − η)ρ(s).
1229
+ Note that in the population level, the marginal distribution of the union dataset DU in time step h is exactly
1230
+ dmix
1231
+ h
1232
+ . The mixture policy induced by dmix can be formulated as
1233
+ πmix
1234
+ h
1235
+ (a1|s) = η, πmix
1236
+ h
1237
+ (a2|s) = 1 − η, ∀s ∈ S, h ∈ [H].
1238
+ Just like before, we have dπmix
1239
+ h
1240
+ (s, a) = dmix
1241
+ h
1242
+ (s, a). The policy value of πmix can be calculated as
1243
+ V(πmix) =
1244
+ H
1245
+
1246
+ h=1
1247
+
1248
+ (s,a)∈S×A
1249
+ dmix
1250
+ h
1251
+ (s, a)rh(s, a) =
1252
+ H
1253
+
1254
+ h=1 ∑
1255
+ s∈S
1256
+ dmix
1257
+ h
1258
+ (s, a1) = ηH.
1259
+ The policy πNBCU can be formulated as
1260
+ ∀h ∈ [H],
1261
+ πNBCU
1262
+ h
1263
+ (a|s) =
1264
+
1265
+
1266
+
1267
+ nU
1268
+ h (s,a)
1269
+ ∑a′ nU
1270
+ h (s,a′)
1271
+ if ∑a′ nU
1272
+ h (s, a′) > 0
1273
+ 1
1274
+ |A|
1275
+ otherwise
1276
+ (14)
1277
+ We can view that the BC’s policy learned on the union dataset mimics the mixture policy πmix. In the
1278
+ following part, we analyze the lower bound on the imitation gap of πNBCU.
1279
+ E
1280
+
1281
+ V(πE) − V(πNBCU)
1282
+
1283
+ = V(πE) − V(πmix) + E
1284
+
1285
+ V(πmix) − V(πNBCU)
1286
+
1287
+ = H − ηH + E
1288
+
1289
+ V(πmix) − V(πNBCU)
1290
+
1291
+ = (1 − η)(V(πE) − V(πβ)) + E
1292
+
1293
+ V(πmix) − V(πNBCU)
1294
+
1295
+ .
1296
+ Then we consider the term E
1297
+
1298
+ V(πmix) − V(πNBCU)
1299
+
1300
+ .
1301
+ V(πmix) − V(πNBCU) =
1302
+ H
1303
+
1304
+ h=1
1305
+
1306
+ (s,a)∈S×A
1307
+
1308
+ dπmix
1309
+ h
1310
+ (s, a) − dπNBCU
1311
+ h
1312
+ (s, a)
1313
+
1314
+ rh(s, a)
1315
+ =
1316
+ H
1317
+
1318
+ h=1
1319
+
1320
+ (s,a)∈S×A
1321
+ ρ(s)
1322
+
1323
+ πmix
1324
+ h
1325
+ (a|s) − πNBCU
1326
+ h
1327
+ (a|s)
1328
+
1329
+ rh(s, a)
1330
+ =
1331
+ H
1332
+
1333
+ h=1
1334
+
1335
+ (s,a)∈S×A
1336
+ ρ(s)
1337
+
1338
+ πmix
1339
+ h
1340
+ (a|s) − πNBCU
1341
+ h
1342
+ (a|s)
1343
+
1344
+ rh(s, a)I{nU
1345
+ h (s) > 0}
1346
+ +
1347
+ H
1348
+
1349
+ h=1
1350
+
1351
+ (s,a)∈S×A
1352
+ ρ(s)
1353
+
1354
+ πmix
1355
+ h
1356
+ (a|s) − πNBCU
1357
+ h
1358
+ (a|s)
1359
+
1360
+ rh(s, a)I{nU
1361
+ h (s) = 0}.
1362
+ We take expectation over the randomness in DU on both sides and obtain that
1363
+ E
1364
+
1365
+ V(πmix) − V(πNBCU)
1366
+
1367
+ = E
1368
+
1369
+
1370
+ H
1371
+
1372
+ h=1
1373
+
1374
+ (s,a)∈S×A
1375
+ ρ(s)
1376
+
1377
+ πmix
1378
+ h
1379
+ (a|s) − πNBCU
1380
+ h
1381
+ (a|s)
1382
+
1383
+ rh(s, a)I{nU
1384
+ h (s) > 0}
1385
+
1386
+
1387
+ + E
1388
+
1389
+
1390
+ H
1391
+
1392
+ h=1
1393
+
1394
+ (s,a)∈S×A
1395
+ ρ(s)
1396
+
1397
+ πmix
1398
+ h
1399
+ (a|s) − πNBCU
1400
+ h
1401
+ (a|s)
1402
+
1403
+ rh(s, a)I{nU
1404
+ h (s) = 0}
1405
+
1406
+ � .
1407
+ (15)
1408
+ 17
1409
+
1410
+ For the first term in RHS, we have that
1411
+ E
1412
+
1413
+
1414
+ H
1415
+
1416
+ h=1
1417
+
1418
+ (s,a)∈S×A
1419
+ ρ(s)
1420
+
1421
+ πmix
1422
+ h
1423
+ (a|s) − πNBCU
1424
+ h
1425
+ (a|s)
1426
+
1427
+ rh(s, a)I{nU
1428
+ h (s) > 0}
1429
+
1430
+
1431
+ =
1432
+ H
1433
+
1434
+ h=1
1435
+
1436
+ (s,a)∈S×A
1437
+ ρ(s)rh(s, a)E
1438
+ ��
1439
+ πmix
1440
+ h
1441
+ (a|s) − πNBCU
1442
+ h
1443
+ (a|s)
1444
+
1445
+ I{nU
1446
+ h (s) > 0}
1447
+
1448
+ =
1449
+ H
1450
+
1451
+ h=1
1452
+
1453
+ (s,a)∈S×A
1454
+ ρ(s)rh(s, a)P
1455
+
1456
+ nU
1457
+ h (s) > 0
1458
+
1459
+ E
1460
+ ��
1461
+ πmix
1462
+ h
1463
+ (a|s) − πNBCU
1464
+ h
1465
+ (a|s)
1466
+ � ����nU
1467
+ h (s) > 0
1468
+
1469
+ = 0.
1470
+ The last equation follows the fact that when nU
1471
+ h (s) > 0, πNBCU
1472
+ h
1473
+ (a|s) is an unbiased maximum likelihood
1474
+ estimation of πmix
1475
+ h
1476
+ (a|s). For the remaining term, we have that
1477
+ E
1478
+
1479
+
1480
+ H
1481
+
1482
+ h=1
1483
+
1484
+ (s,a)∈S×A
1485
+ ρ(s)
1486
+
1487
+ πmix
1488
+ h
1489
+ (a|s) − πNBCU
1490
+ h
1491
+ (a|s)
1492
+
1493
+ rh(s, a)I{nU
1494
+ h (s) = 0}
1495
+
1496
+
1497
+ =
1498
+ H
1499
+
1500
+ h=1
1501
+
1502
+ (s,a)∈S×A
1503
+ ρ(s)rh(s, a)E
1504
+ ��
1505
+ πmix
1506
+ h
1507
+ (a|s) − πNBCU
1508
+ h
1509
+ (a|s)
1510
+
1511
+ I{nU
1512
+ h (s) = 0}
1513
+
1514
+ =
1515
+ H
1516
+
1517
+ h=1
1518
+
1519
+ (s,a)∈S×A
1520
+ ρ(s)rh(s, a)P
1521
+
1522
+ nU
1523
+ h (s) = 0
1524
+
1525
+ E
1526
+ ��
1527
+ πmix
1528
+ h
1529
+ (a|s) − πNBCU
1530
+ h
1531
+ (a|s)
1532
+ � ����nU
1533
+ h (s) = 0
1534
+
1535
+ =
1536
+ H
1537
+
1538
+ h=1
1539
+
1540
+ (s,a)∈S×A
1541
+ ρ(s)rh(s, a)P
1542
+
1543
+ nU
1544
+ h (s) = 0
1545
+ � �
1546
+ πmix
1547
+ h
1548
+ (a|s) −
1549
+ 1
1550
+ |A|
1551
+
1552
+ (a)
1553
+ =
1554
+ H
1555
+
1556
+ h=1 ∑
1557
+ s∈S
1558
+ ρ(s)P
1559
+
1560
+ nU
1561
+ h (s) = 0
1562
+ � �
1563
+ η −
1564
+ 1
1565
+ |A|
1566
+
1567
+ (b)
1568
+ = H
1569
+
1570
+ η −
1571
+ 1
1572
+ |A|
1573
+
1574
+
1575
+ s∈S
1576
+ ρ(s)P
1577
+
1578
+ nU
1579
+ 1 (s) = 0
1580
+
1581
+ .
1582
+ In the equation (a), we use the fact that rh(s, a1) = 1, rh(s, a) = 0, ∀a ∈ A \ {a1}. In the equation (b), since
1583
+ each state is an absorbing state, we have that P
1584
+
1585
+ nU
1586
+ h (s) = 0
1587
+ � = P
1588
+
1589
+ nU
1590
+ 1 (s) = 0
1591
+
1592
+ , ∀h ∈ [H].
1593
+ We consider two cases. In the first case of η ≥ 1/|A|, we directly have that
1594
+ E
1595
+
1596
+
1597
+ H
1598
+
1599
+ h=1
1600
+
1601
+ (s,a)∈S×A
1602
+ ρ(s)
1603
+
1604
+ πmix
1605
+ h
1606
+ (a|s) − πNBCU
1607
+ h
1608
+ (a|s)
1609
+
1610
+ rh(s, a)I{nU
1611
+ h (s) = 0}
1612
+
1613
+ � ≥ 0.
1614
+ By Equation (15), we have that
1615
+ E
1616
+
1617
+ V(πmix) − V(πNBCU)
1618
+
1619
+ ≥ 0,
1620
+ which implies that
1621
+ E
1622
+
1623
+ V(πE) − V(πNBCU)
1624
+
1625
+ ≥ (1 − η)(V(πE) − V(πβ)).
1626
+ In the second case of η < 1/|A|, we have that
1627
+ H
1628
+
1629
+ η −
1630
+ 1
1631
+ |A|
1632
+
1633
+
1634
+ s∈S
1635
+ ρ(s)P
1636
+
1637
+ nU
1638
+ 1 (s) = 0
1639
+ � (a)
1640
+ ≥ −
1641
+ � 1
1642
+ |A| − η
1643
+
1644
+ H exp
1645
+
1646
+ − Ntot
1647
+ |S|
1648
+
1649
+ 18
1650
+
1651
+ ≥ −(1 − η)H exp
1652
+
1653
+ − Ntot
1654
+ |S|
1655
+
1656
+ (b)
1657
+ ≥ −(1 − η)H
1658
+ 2
1659
+ .
1660
+ In the inequality (a), we use that
1661
+
1662
+ s∈S
1663
+ ρ(s)P
1664
+
1665
+ nU
1666
+ 1 (s) = 0
1667
+
1668
+ = ∑
1669
+ s∈S
1670
+ ρ(s)(1 − ρ(s))Ntot =
1671
+
1672
+ 1 − 1
1673
+ |S|
1674
+ �Ntot
1675
+ ≤ exp
1676
+
1677
+ − Ntot
1678
+ |S|
1679
+
1680
+ .
1681
+ The inequality (b) holds since we consider the range where Ntot ≥ |S| log(2). By Equation (15), we have that
1682
+ E
1683
+
1684
+ V(πmix) − V(πNBCU)
1685
+
1686
+ ≥ −(1 − η)H
1687
+ 2
1688
+ .
1689
+ This implies that
1690
+ E
1691
+
1692
+ V(πE) − V(πNBCU)
1693
+
1694
+ ≥ (1 − η)(V(πE) − V(πβ)) − (1 − η)H
1695
+ 2
1696
+ = (1 − η)
1697
+ 2
1698
+ (V(πE) − V(πβ)).
1699
+ In both cases, we prove that E
1700
+
1701
+ V(πE) − V(πNBCU)
1702
+ � ≳ (1 − η)(V(πE) − V(πβ)) and thus complete the
1703
+ proof.
1704
+ A.4
1705
+ Proof of Theorem 3
1706
+ When πβ = πE, E
1707
+
1708
+ V(πE) − V(πNBCU)
1709
+
1710
+ is exactly the imitation gap of BC on DU with expert policy πE. By
1711
+ [Rajaraman et al., 2020, Theorem 4.2], we finish the proof.
1712
+ A.5
1713
+ Proof of Theorem 4
1714
+ According to the policy difference lemma in [Kakade and Langford, 2002], we have that
1715
+ V(πE) − V(πNBCU) =
1716
+ H
1717
+
1718
+ h=1
1719
+ Esh∼dπE
1720
+ h (·)
1721
+
1722
+ QπNBCU
1723
+ h
1724
+ (sh, πE
1725
+ h (sh)) − ∑
1726
+ a∈A
1727
+ πNBCU
1728
+ h
1729
+ (·|sh)QπNBCU
1730
+ h
1731
+ (sh, a)
1732
+
1733
+ =
1734
+ H
1735
+
1736
+ h=1
1737
+ Esh∼dπE
1738
+ h (·)
1739
+
1740
+ QπNBCU
1741
+ h
1742
+ (sh, πE
1743
+ h (sh))(1 − πNBCU
1744
+ h
1745
+ (πE
1746
+ h (sh)|sh))
1747
+
1748
+ ≤ H
1749
+ H
1750
+
1751
+ h=1
1752
+ Es∼dπE
1753
+ h (·)
1754
+
1755
+ Ea∼πNBCU
1756
+ h
1757
+ (·|s)
1758
+
1759
+ I
1760
+
1761
+ a ̸= πE
1762
+ h (s)
1763
+ ���
1764
+ ,
1765
+ where Qπ
1766
+ h (s, a) = E[∑H
1767
+ t=h r(st, at)|(sh, ah) = (s, a)] is the state-action value function for a policy π and πE
1768
+ h (sh)
1769
+ denotes the expert action. By assumption, we have ∀h ∈ [H], supp(dπE
1770
+ h (·)) ∩ supp(dπβ
1771
+ h (·)) = ∅. Therefore,
1772
+ we know that the union state-action pairs in DU does not affect πNBCU on expert states. As a result, πNBCU
1773
+ exactly takes expert actions on states visited in DE. Then we have that
1774
+ V(πE) − V(πNBCU) ≤ H
1775
+ H
1776
+
1777
+ h=1
1778
+ Es∼dπE
1779
+ h (·)
1780
+
1781
+ I
1782
+
1783
+ s /∈ Sh(DE)
1784
+ ��
1785
+ ,
1786
+ where Sh(DE) is the set of states in time step h in DE. Taking expectation over the randomness within DE on
1787
+ both sides yields that
1788
+ V(πE) − EDE
1789
+
1790
+ V(πNBCU)
1791
+
1792
+ ≤ HEDE
1793
+
1794
+ H
1795
+
1796
+ h=1
1797
+ Es∼dπE
1798
+ h (·)
1799
+
1800
+ I
1801
+
1802
+ s /∈ Sh(DE)
1803
+ ���
1804
+ .
1805
+ 19
1806
+
1807
+ By [Rajaraman et al., 2020, Lemma A.1], we further derive that
1808
+ V(πE) − EDE
1809
+
1810
+ V(πNBCU)
1811
+
1812
+
1813
+ |S|H2
1814
+ max{|DE|, 1} ≤ 2|S|H2
1815
+ |DE| + 1.
1816
+ We take expectation over the binomial variable |DE| and have that
1817
+ V(πE) − E
1818
+
1819
+ V(πNBCU)
1820
+
1821
+ ≤ E
1822
+ � 2|S|H2
1823
+ |DE| + 1
1824
+
1825
+ ≤ 2|S|H2
1826
+ Ntotη
1827
+ = 2|S|H2
1828
+ NE
1829
+ ,
1830
+ which completes the proof.
1831
+ B
1832
+ Proof of Results in Section 5
1833
+ B.1
1834
+ Proof of Proposition 2
1835
+ In the tabular case, with the first-order optimality condition, we have c⋆
1836
+ h(s, a) = �
1837
+ dE
1838
+ h(s, a)/(�
1839
+ dE
1840
+ h(s, a) + �
1841
+ dU
1842
+ h (s, a)).
1843
+ By Equation (9), we have
1844
+
1845
+ dU
1846
+ h (s, a)wh(s, a) = �
1847
+ dU
1848
+ h (s, a) ×
1849
+
1850
+ dE
1851
+ h(s, a)
1852
+
1853
+ dU
1854
+ h (s, a)
1855
+ = �
1856
+ dE
1857
+ h(s, a).
1858
+ Hence, the learning objective (6) reduces to (1).
1859
+ B.2
1860
+ Proof of Lemma 1
1861
+ Recall that
1862
+ ∆h(θ) =
1863
+ min
1864
+ (s,a)∈DE
1865
+ h ∪DS,1
1866
+ h
1867
+ ⟨θ, φh(s, a)⟩ −
1868
+ max
1869
+ (s′,a′)∈DS,2
1870
+ h
1871
+ ⟨θ, φh(s′, a′)⟩.
1872
+ Then we have that
1873
+ ∆h( ¯θh) − ∆h(θ) =
1874
+ min
1875
+ (s,a)∈DE
1876
+ h ∪DS,1
1877
+ h
1878
+ ⟨ ¯θh, φh(s, a)⟩ −
1879
+ max
1880
+ (s′,a′)∈DS,2
1881
+ h
1882
+ ⟨ ¯θh, φh(s′, a′)⟩
1883
+
1884
+ min
1885
+ (s,a)∈DE
1886
+ h ∪DS,1
1887
+ h
1888
+ ⟨θ, φh(s, a)⟩ +
1889
+ max
1890
+ (s′,a′)∈DS,2
1891
+ h
1892
+ ⟨θ, φh(s′, a′)⟩
1893
+ (a)
1894
+ ≤ ⟨ ¯θh, φh(s1, a1)⟩ − ⟨ ¯θh, φh(s2, a2)⟩ − ⟨θ, φh(s1, a1)⟩ + ⟨θ, φh(s2, a2)⟩
1895
+ = ⟨ ¯θh − θ, φh(s1, a1) − φh(s2, a2)⟩
1896
+ (b)
1897
+
1898
+ �� ¯θh − θ
1899
+ ��
1900
+ ���φh(s1, a1) − φh(s2, a2)
1901
+ ��� .
1902
+ In inequality (a), we utilize the facts that (s1, a1) ∈ argmin(s,a)∈DE
1903
+ h ∪DS,1
1904
+ h ⟨θh, φh(s, a)⟩ and
1905
+ (s2, a2) ∈ argmax(s,a)∈DS,2
1906
+ h ⟨θh, φh(s, a)⟩. Inequality (b) follows the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality. Let Lh =
1907
+ ��φh(s1, a1) − φh(s2, a2)
1908
+ �� and we finish the proof.
1909
+ B.3
1910
+ Proof of Lemma 2
1911
+ First, by Taylor’s Theorem, there exists θ′
1912
+ h ∈ {θ ∈ Rd : θt = θ⋆
1913
+ h + t(θh − θ⋆
1914
+ h), ∀t ∈ [0, 1]} such that
1915
+ Lh(θh) = Lh(θ⋆
1916
+ h) + ⟨∇Lh(θ⋆
1917
+ h), θh − θ⋆
1918
+ h⟩ + 1
1919
+ 2
1920
+
1921
+ θh − θ⋆
1922
+ h
1923
+ �⊤ ∇2Lh(θ′
1924
+ h)
1925
+
1926
+ θh − θ⋆
1927
+ h
1928
+
1929
+ = Lh(θ⋆
1930
+ h) + 1
1931
+ 2
1932
+
1933
+ θh − θ⋆
1934
+ h
1935
+ �⊤ ∇2Lh(θ′
1936
+ h)
1937
+
1938
+ θh − θ⋆
1939
+ h
1940
+
1941
+ .
1942
+ (16)
1943
+ 20
1944
+
1945
+ The last equality follows the optimality condition that ∇Lh(θ⋆
1946
+ h) = 0. Then, our strategy is to prove that the
1947
+ smallest eigenvalue of the Hessian matrix ∇2Lh(θ′
1948
+ h) is positive, i.e., λmin(∇2Lh(θ′
1949
+ h)) > 0. We first calculate
1950
+ the Hessian matrix ∇2Lh(θ′
1951
+ h). Given DE and DU, we define the function G : R(|DE|+|DU|) → R as
1952
+ G(v) ≜
1953
+ 1
1954
+ |DE|
1955
+ |DE|
1956
+
1957
+ i=1
1958
+ g(vi) +
1959
+ 1
1960
+ |DU|
1961
+ |DU|
1962
+
1963
+ j=1
1964
+ g(vj),
1965
+ where vi is the i-th element in the vector v ∈ R(|DE|+|DU|) and g(x) = log (1 + exp(x)) is a real-valued
1966
+ function. Besides, we use Bh ∈ R(|DE|+|DU|)×d to denote the matrix whose i-th row Bh,i = −yiφh(si, ai)⊤, and
1967
+ yi = 1 if (si, ai) ∈ DE
1968
+ h, yi = −1 if (si, ai) /∈ DE
1969
+ h. Then the objective function can be reformulated as
1970
+ Lh(θh) = ∑
1971
+ (s,a)
1972
+
1973
+ dE
1974
+ h(s, a) [log (1 + exp (−⟨φh(s, a), θh⟩))] + ∑
1975
+ (s,a)
1976
+
1977
+ dU
1978
+ h (s, a) [log (1 + exp (⟨φh(s, a), θh⟩))]
1979
+ =
1980
+ 1
1981
+ |DE|
1982
+
1983
+ (s,a)∈DE
1984
+ log (1 + exp (−⟨φh(s, a), θh⟩)) +
1985
+ 1
1986
+ |DU|
1987
+
1988
+ (s,a)∈DU
1989
+ log (1 + exp (⟨φh(s, a), θh⟩))
1990
+ = G(Bhθh).
1991
+ Then we have that ∇2Lh(θh) = B⊤
1992
+ h ∇2G(Bhθh)Bh, where
1993
+ ∇2G(Bhθh) = diag
1994
+
1995
+ g′′((Bhθh)1)
1996
+ |DE|
1997
+ , . . . ,
1998
+ g′′((Bhθh)|DE|)
1999
+ |DE|
2000
+ ,
2001
+ g′′((Bhθh)|DE|+1)
2002
+ |DE| + |DU|
2003
+ , . . . ,
2004
+ g′′((Bhθh)|DE|+|DU|)
2005
+ |DE| + |DU|
2006
+
2007
+ .
2008
+ Here g′′(x) = σ(x)(1 − σ(x)), where σ(x) = 1/(1 + exp(−x)) is the sigmoid function. The eigenvalues of
2009
+ ∇2G(Bhθh) are
2010
+
2011
+ g′′((Bhθh)1)
2012
+ |DE|
2013
+ , . . . ,
2014
+ g′′((Bhθh)|DE|)
2015
+ |DE|
2016
+ ,
2017
+ g′′((Bhθh)|DE|+1)
2018
+ |DE| + |DU|
2019
+ , . . . ,
2020
+ g′′((Bhθh)|DE|+|DU|)
2021
+ |DE| + |DU|
2022
+
2023
+ .
2024
+ Notice that θ′
2025
+ h ∈ {θ ∈ Rd : θt = θ⋆
2026
+ h + t(θh − θ⋆
2027
+ h), ∀t ∈ [0, 1]}. For a matrix A, we use λmin(A) to denote the
2028
+ minimal eigenvalue of A. Here we claim that the minimum of the minimal eigenvalues of ∇2G(Bhθt) over
2029
+ t ∈ [0, 1] is achieved at t = 0 or t = 1. That is,
2030
+ min{λmin(∇2G(Bhθt)) : ∀t ∈ [0, 1]} = min{λmin(∇2G(Bhθ0)), λmin(∇2G(Bhθ1))}.
2031
+ We prove this claim as follows. For any t ∈ [0, 1], we use {λ1(t), . . . , λ|DE|+|DU|(t)} to denote the eigenvalues
2032
+ of ∇2G(Bhθt). For each i ∈ [|DE| + |DU|], we consider λi(t) : [0, 1] → R as a function of t. Specifically,
2033
+ λi(t) =
2034
+
2035
+
2036
+
2037
+ g′′((Bhθ⋆
2038
+ h)i+t(Bh(θh−θ⋆
2039
+ h))i)
2040
+ |DE|
2041
+ ,
2042
+ if i ∈ [|DE|]
2043
+ g′′((Bhθ⋆
2044
+ h)i+t(Bh(θh−θ⋆
2045
+ h))i)
2046
+ |DE|+|DU|
2047
+ ,
2048
+ otherwise.
2049
+ We observe that g′′′(x) = σ(x)(1 − σ(x))(1 − 2σ(x)) which satisfies that ∀x ≤ 0, g′′′(x) ≥ 0, and ∀x ≥
2050
+ 0, g′′′(x) ≤ 0. Therefore, we have that the minimum of λi(t) over t ∈ [0, 1] must be achieved at t = 0 or
2051
+ t = 1. That is,
2052
+ min
2053
+ t∈[0,1] λi(t) = min{λi(0), λi(1)}.
2054
+ (17)
2055
+ For any t ∈ [0, 1], we define it ∈ [|DE| + |DU|] as the index of the minimal eigenvalue of ∇2G(Bhθt), i.e.,
2056
+ λit(t) = λmin(∇2G(Bhθt)). Then we have that
2057
+ min{λmin(∇2G(Bhθt)) : ∀t ∈ [0, 1]} = min{λit(t) : ∀t ∈ [0, 1]}
2058
+ (a)
2059
+ = min{min{λit(0), λit(1)} : ∀t ∈ [0, 1]}
2060
+ = min{λi0(0), λi1(1)}
2061
+ 21
2062
+
2063
+ (b)
2064
+ = min{λmin(∇2G(Bhθ0)), λmin(∇2G(Bhθ1))}
2065
+ Equality (a) follows (17) and equality (b) follows that λi0(0) and λi1(1) are the minimal eigenvalues of
2066
+ ∇2G(Bhθ0) and ∇2G(Bhθ1), respectively.
2067
+ In summary, we derive that
2068
+ min{λmin(∇2G(Bhθt)) : ∀t ∈ [0, 1]} = min{λmin(∇2G(Bhθ0)), λmin(∇2G(Bhθ1))},
2069
+ (18)
2070
+ which proves the previous claim.
2071
+ Further, we consider λmin
2072
+ �∇2Lh(θh)
2073
+
2074
+ .
2075
+ λmin
2076
+
2077
+ ∇2Lh(θh)
2078
+
2079
+ =
2080
+ inf
2081
+ x∈Rd:∥x∥=1
2082
+ x⊤∇2Lh(θh)x
2083
+ =
2084
+ inf
2085
+ x∈Rd:∥x∥=1 (Bhx)⊤ ∇2G(Bhθh) (Bhx)
2086
+ =
2087
+ inf
2088
+ z∈Im(Bh) z⊤∇2G(Bhθh)z
2089
+ =
2090
+
2091
+ inf
2092
+ z∈Im(Bh) ∥z∥
2093
+ �2
2094
+ λmin(∇2G(Bhθh))
2095
+
2096
+
2097
+ inf
2098
+ z∈Im(Bh) ∥z∥
2099
+ �2
2100
+ min{λmin(∇2G(Bhθ0)), λmin(∇2G(Bhθ1))}.
2101
+ Here Im(Bh) = {z ∈ Rd : z = Bhx, ∥x∥ = 1}. The last inequality follows Equation (18).
2102
+ In the under-parameterization case where rank(Ah) = d, we have that rank(Bh) = d. Thus, Im(Bh) is a
2103
+ set of vectors with positive norms, i.e., infz∈Im(Bh) ∥z∥ > 0. Besides, since g′′(x) = σ(x)(1 − σ(x)) > 0, we
2104
+ also have that
2105
+ min{λmin(∇2G(Bhθ0)), λmin(∇2G(Bhθ1))} > 0.
2106
+ In summary, we obtain that
2107
+ λmin
2108
+
2109
+ ∇2Lh(θh)
2110
+
2111
+
2112
+
2113
+ inf
2114
+ z∈Im(Bh) ∥z∥
2115
+ �2
2116
+ min{λmin(∇2G(Bhθ0)), λmin(∇2G(Bhθ1))} > 0.
2117
+ Then, with Equation (16), there exists τh =
2118
+
2119
+ infz∈Im(Bh) ∥z∥
2120
+ �2
2121
+ min{λmin(∇2G(Bhθ0)), λmin(∇2G(Bhθ1))} >
2122
+ 0 such that
2123
+ Lh(θh) ≥ Lh(θ⋆
2124
+ h) + τh
2125
+ 2
2126
+ ��θh − θ⋆
2127
+ h
2128
+ ��2 ,
2129
+ which completes the proof.
2130
+ B.4
2131
+ Proof of Theorem 5
2132
+ First, invoking Lemma 1 with θ = θ⋆
2133
+ h yields that
2134
+ ∆h(θ⋆
2135
+ h) ≥ ∆h( ¯θh) − Lh
2136
+ �� ¯θh − θ⋆
2137
+ h
2138
+ �� .
2139
+ Here Lh = ∥φh(s, a) − φh(s′, a′)∥ with (s, a) ∈ argmin(s,a)∈DE
2140
+ h ∪DS,1
2141
+ h ⟨θ⋆
2142
+ h, φh(s, a)⟩ and
2143
+ (s′, a′) ∈ argmax(s,a)∈DS,2
2144
+ h ⟨θ⋆
2145
+ h, φh(s, a)⟩. Then, by Lemma 2, there exists τh > 0 such that
2146
+ Lh(θh) ≥ Lh(θ⋆
2147
+ h) + τh
2148
+ 2
2149
+ ��θh − θ⋆
2150
+ h
2151
+ ��2 .
2152
+ 22
2153
+
2154
+ This directly implies an upper bound of the distance between θh and θ⋆
2155
+ h.
2156
+ ��θh − θ⋆
2157
+ h
2158
+ �� ≤
2159
+
2160
+ 2
2161
+ �Lh( ¯θh) − Lh(θ⋆
2162
+ h)
2163
+
2164
+ τh
2165
+ .
2166
+ When inequality (13) holds, we further have that
2167
+ ��θh − θ⋆
2168
+ h
2169
+ �� < ∆h( ¯θh)/Lh. Then we get that
2170
+ ∆h(θ⋆
2171
+ h) ≥ ∆h( ¯θh) − Lh
2172
+ �� ¯θh − θ⋆
2173
+ h
2174
+ �� > 0,
2175
+ which completes the proof.
2176
+ B.5
2177
+ An Example Corresponding to Theorem 5
2178
+ Example 1. To illustrate Theorem 5, we consider an example in the feature space R2. In particular, for time step
2179
+ h ∈ [H], we have the expert dataset and supplementary dataset as follows.
2180
+ DE
2181
+ h =
2182
+ ��
2183
+ s(1), a(1)�
2184
+ ,
2185
+
2186
+ s(4), a(4)��
2187
+ , DS
2188
+ h =
2189
+ ��
2190
+ s(2), a(2)�
2191
+ ,
2192
+
2193
+ s(3), a(3)��
2194
+ ,
2195
+ DS,1
2196
+ h
2197
+ =
2198
+ ��
2199
+ s(2), a(2)��
2200
+ , DS,2
2201
+ h
2202
+ =
2203
+ ��
2204
+ s(3), a(3)��
2205
+ .
2206
+ The corresponding features are
2207
+ φh
2208
+
2209
+ s(1), a(1)�
2210
+ = (0, 1)⊤, φh
2211
+
2212
+ s(2), a(2)�
2213
+ =
2214
+
2215
+ −1
2216
+ 2, 0
2217
+ �⊤
2218
+ ,
2219
+ φh
2220
+
2221
+ s(3), a(3)�
2222
+ =
2223
+
2224
+ 0, −1
2225
+ 2
2226
+ �⊤
2227
+ , φh
2228
+
2229
+ s(4), a(4)�
2230
+ = (−1, 0)⊤.
2231
+ Notice that the set of expert-style samples is DE
2232
+ h ∪ DS,1
2233
+ h
2234
+ = {(s(1), a(1)), (s(2), a(2)), (s(4), a(4))} and the set of non-
2235
+ expert-style samples is DS,2
2236
+ h
2237
+ = {(s(3), a(3))}. It is direct to calculate that the ground-truth parameter that achieves
2238
+ the maximum margin among unit vectors is θh = (−
2239
+
2240
+ 2/2,
2241
+
2242
+ 2/2)⊤ and the maximum margin is ∆h(θh) =
2243
+
2244
+ 2/2.
2245
+ According to Equation (12), for θh = (θh,1, θh,2)⊤, the optimization objective is
2246
+ Lh(θh) = ∑
2247
+ (s,a)
2248
+
2249
+ dE
2250
+ h(s, a) [log (1 + exp (−⟨φh(s, a), θh⟩))] + ∑
2251
+ (s,a)
2252
+
2253
+ dU
2254
+ h (s, a) [log (1 + exp (⟨φh(s, a), θh⟩))]
2255
+ = 1
2256
+ 2 (log (1 + exp (−θh,2)) + log (1 + exp (θh,1)))
2257
+ + 1
2258
+ 4
2259
+
2260
+ log (1 + exp (θh,2)) + log
2261
+
2262
+ 1 + exp
2263
+
2264
+ −1
2265
+ 2θh,1
2266
+ ���
2267
+ + 1
2268
+ 4
2269
+
2270
+ log
2271
+
2272
+ 1 + exp
2273
+
2274
+ −1
2275
+ 2θh,2
2276
+ ��
2277
+ + log (1 + exp (−θh,1))
2278
+
2279
+ .
2280
+ We apply CVXPY [Diamond and Boyd, 2016] to calculate the optimal solution θ⋆
2281
+ h ≈ (−0.310, 0.993)⊤ and the
2282
+ objective values Lh(θ⋆
2283
+ h) ≈ 1.287, Lh(θh) ≈ 1.309. Furthermore, we calculate the Lipschitz coefficient Lh appears in
2284
+ Lemma 1.
2285
+ (s(2), a(2)) =
2286
+ argmin
2287
+ (s,a)∈DE
2288
+ h ∪DS,1
2289
+ h
2290
+ ⟨θ⋆
2291
+ h, φh(s, a)⟩, (s(3), a(3)) ∈ argmax
2292
+ (s,a)∈DS,2
2293
+ h
2294
+ ⟨θ⋆
2295
+ h, φh(s, a)⟩,
2296
+ Lh =
2297
+ ���φh(s(2), a(2)) − φh(s(3), a(3))
2298
+ ��� =
2299
+
2300
+ 2
2301
+ 2 .
2302
+ Then we calculate the parameter of strong convexity τh appears in Lemma 2. Based on the proof of Lemma 2, our
2303
+ strategy is to calculate the minimal eigenvalue of the Hessian matrix.
2304
+ 23
2305
+
2306
+ First, for θh = (θh,1, θh,2)⊤, the gradient of Lh(θh) is
2307
+ ∇Lh(θh) = −
2308
+
2309
+ (s,a)∈S×A
2310
+
2311
+ dE
2312
+ h(s, a)σ(−⟨φh(s, a), θh⟩) +
2313
+
2314
+ (s,a)∈S×A
2315
+
2316
+ dU
2317
+ h (s, a)σ (⟨φh(s, a), θh⟩)
2318
+ =
2319
+ �1
2320
+ 2σ(θh,1) − 1
2321
+ 4σ(−θh,1) − 1
2322
+ 8σ(−1
2323
+ 2θh,1), 1
2324
+ 4σ (θh,2) − 1
2325
+ 2σ (−θh,2) − 1
2326
+ 8σ(−1
2327
+ 2θh,2)
2328
+ �⊤
2329
+ .
2330
+ Here σ(x) = 1/(1 + exp(−x)) for x ∈ R is the sigmoid function. Then the Hessian matrix at θh is
2331
+ ∇2Lh(θh) =
2332
+
2333
+
2334
+ 3
2335
+ 4 f (θh,1) + 1
2336
+ 16 f
2337
+
2338
+ 1
2339
+ 2θh,1
2340
+
2341
+ 0
2342
+ 0
2343
+ 3
2344
+ 4 f (θh,2) + 1
2345
+ 16 f
2346
+
2347
+ 1
2348
+ 2θh,2
2349
+
2350
+
2351
+ � ,
2352
+ where f (x) = σ(x)(1 − σ(x)) and f (x) = f (−x). For any t ∈ [0, 1], the eigenvalues of the Hessian matrix at
2353
+ θt
2354
+ h = θh + t(θ⋆
2355
+ h − θh) are
2356
+ 3
2357
+ 4 f (θt
2358
+ h,1) + 1
2359
+ 16 f
2360
+ �1
2361
+ 2θt
2362
+ h,1
2363
+
2364
+ , 3
2365
+ 4 f (θt
2366
+ h,2) + 1
2367
+ 16 f
2368
+ �1
2369
+ 2θt
2370
+ h,2
2371
+
2372
+ .
2373
+ Now, we calculate the minimal eigenvalues of ∇2Lh(θt
2374
+ h). We consider the function
2375
+ g(x) = 3
2376
+ 4 f (x) + 1
2377
+ 16 f
2378
+ �1
2379
+ 2x
2380
+
2381
+ , ∀x ∈ [a, b].
2382
+ The gradient is
2383
+ g′(x) = 3
2384
+ 4σ(x)(1 − σ(x))(1 − 2σ(x)) + 1
2385
+ 32σ
2386
+ �1
2387
+ 2x
2388
+ � �
2389
+ 1 − σ
2390
+ �1
2391
+ 2x
2392
+ �� �
2393
+ 1 − 2σ
2394
+ �1
2395
+ 2x
2396
+ ��
2397
+ .
2398
+ We observe that ∀x ≤ 0, g′(x) ≥ 0, and ∀x ≥ 0, g′(x) ≤ 0. Thus, we have that the minimum of g(x) must be
2399
+ achieved at x = a or x = b. Besides, we have that g(x) = g(−x). With the above arguments, we know that the
2400
+ minimal eigenvalue is g(0.993) ≈ 0.163 and τh ≈ 0.163. Then we can calculate that
2401
+
2402
+ 2
2403
+ �Lh( ¯θh) − Lh(θ⋆
2404
+ h)
2405
+
2406
+ τh
2407
+ ≈ 0.520, ∆h( ¯θh)
2408
+ Lh
2409
+ = 1.
2410
+ The inequality (13) holds.
2411
+ B.6
2412
+ Additional Analysis of WBCU With Function Approximation
2413
+ Here we provide an additional theoretical result for WBCU with function approximation when d = 1.
2414
+ Theorem 6. Consider d = 1. For any h ∈ [H], if the following inequality holds
2415
+ 1
2416
+ |DS|
2417
+
2418
+ (s,a)∈DS
2419
+ h
2420
+ ⟨φh(s, a), ¯θh⟩ <
2421
+ 1
2422
+ |DE|
2423
+
2424
+ (s′,a′)∈DE
2425
+ h
2426
+ ⟨φh(s′, a′), ¯θh⟩.
2427
+ (19)
2428
+ then we have that ∆h(θ⋆
2429
+ h) > 0. Furthermore, the inequality (19) is also a necessary condition.
2430
+ Theorem 6 provides a clean and sharp condition to guarantee that the learned discriminator can perfectly
2431
+ classify the high-quality samples from DE
2432
+ h and DS,1
2433
+ h , and low-quality samples from DS,2
2434
+ h . In particular,
2435
+ inequality (19) means that by the ground truth parameter ¯θh, the average score of samples in supplementary
2436
+ dataset is lower than that of samples in expert dataset. This condition is easy to satisfy because the
2437
+ supplementary dataset contains bad samples from DS,2
2438
+ h
2439
+ whose scores are much lower. In contrast, DE only
2440
+ contains expert-type samples with high scores.
2441
+ 24
2442
+
2443
+ Proof. Recall the objective function
2444
+ min
2445
+ θh
2446
+ Lh(θh) = ∑
2447
+ (s,a)
2448
+
2449
+ dE
2450
+ h(s, a) log (1 + exp (−⟨φh(s, a), θh⟩)) + ∑
2451
+ (s,a)
2452
+
2453
+ dU
2454
+ h (s, a) log (1 + exp (⟨φh(s, a), θh⟩)) .
2455
+ Consider the function f (x) = log(1 + exp(x)). We have that f ′′(x) = σ(x)(1 − σ(x)) ≥ 0, where σ(x) =
2456
+ 1/(1 + exp(−x)). As such, f ′′(x) is a convex function. Notice that the operations of composition with affine
2457
+ function and non-negative weighted sum preserve convexity [Boyd et al., 2004]. Therefore, Lh(θh) is a
2458
+ convex function with respect to θh. Then for any �θ ∈ R, it holds that
2459
+ Lh(θh) ≥ Lh(�θ) + ∇Lh(�θ)
2460
+
2461
+ θh − �θ
2462
+
2463
+ .
2464
+ Setting θh = θ⋆
2465
+ h and �θ = 0 yields that
2466
+ ∇Lh(0)θ⋆
2467
+ h ≤ Lh(θ⋆
2468
+ h) − Lh(0).
2469
+ (20)
2470
+ The gradient of Lh(θh) is of the form
2471
+ ∇Lh(θh) = −
2472
+
2473
+ (s,a)∈S×A
2474
+
2475
+ dE
2476
+ h(s, a)σ(−⟨φh(s, a), θh⟩)φh(s, a) +
2477
+
2478
+ (s,a)∈S×A
2479
+
2480
+ dU
2481
+ h (s, a)σ (⟨φh(s, a), θh⟩) φh(s, a).
2482
+ Here σ(x) = 1/(1 + exp(−x)) is the sigmoid function. Then we calculate the gradient at �θ = 0.
2483
+ ∇Lh(0) = −
2484
+
2485
+ (s,a)∈S×A
2486
+
2487
+ dE
2488
+ h(s, a)σ(0)φh(s, a) +
2489
+
2490
+ (s,a)∈S×A
2491
+
2492
+ dU
2493
+ h (s, a)σ (0) φh(s, a)
2494
+ = 1
2495
+ 2
2496
+ �∑(s,a)∈DU
2497
+ h φh(s, a)
2498
+ |DU|
2499
+
2500
+ ∑(s,a)∈DE
2501
+ h φh(s, a)
2502
+ |DE|
2503
+
2504
+ =
2505
+ 1
2506
+ 2|DU|
2507
+
2508
+ � ∑
2509
+ (s,a)∈DU
2510
+ h
2511
+ φh(s, a) − |DU|
2512
+ |DE|
2513
+
2514
+ (s,a)∈DE
2515
+ h
2516
+ φh(s, a)
2517
+
2518
+
2519
+ =
2520
+ 1
2521
+ 2|DU|
2522
+
2523
+ � ∑
2524
+ (s,a)∈DS
2525
+ h
2526
+ φh(s, a) +
2527
+
2528
+ (s,a)∈DE
2529
+ h
2530
+ φh(s, a) − |DU|
2531
+ |DE|
2532
+
2533
+ (s,a)∈DE
2534
+ h
2535
+ φh(s, a)
2536
+
2537
+
2538
+ =
2539
+ 1
2540
+ 2|DU|
2541
+
2542
+ � ∑
2543
+ (s,a)∈DS
2544
+ h
2545
+ φh(s, a) − |DS|
2546
+ |DE|
2547
+
2548
+ (s,a)∈DE
2549
+ h
2550
+ φh(s, a)
2551
+
2552
+
2553
+ = |DS|
2554
+ 2|DU|
2555
+
2556
+
2557
+ 1
2558
+ |DS|
2559
+
2560
+ (s,a)∈DS
2561
+ h
2562
+ φh(s, a) −
2563
+ 1
2564
+ |DE|
2565
+
2566
+ (s,a)∈DE
2567
+ h
2568
+ φh(s, a)
2569
+
2570
+ � .
2571
+ Furthermore, with inequality (19), we know that
2572
+ 1
2573
+ |DS|
2574
+
2575
+ (s,a)∈DS
2576
+ h
2577
+ φh(s, a) −
2578
+ 1
2579
+ |DE|
2580
+
2581
+ (s,a)∈DE
2582
+ h
2583
+ φh(s, a) ̸= 0.
2584
+ Therefore, ∇Lh(0) ̸= 0. With the first-order optimality condition, we know that 0 is not the optimal solution
2585
+ and Lh(0) > Lh(θ⋆
2586
+ h). Combined with inequality (20), we have that
2587
+ ∇Lh(0)θ⋆
2588
+ h ≤ Lh(θ⋆
2589
+ h) − Lh(0) < 0.
2590
+ This directly implies that
2591
+
2592
+
2593
+ 1
2594
+ |DS|
2595
+
2596
+ (s,a)∈DS
2597
+ h
2598
+ φh(s, a) −
2599
+ 1
2600
+ |DE|
2601
+
2602
+ (s,a)∈DE
2603
+ h
2604
+ φh(s, a)
2605
+
2606
+ � θ⋆
2607
+ h < 0.
2608
+ 25
2609
+
2610
+ Besides, inequality (19) implies that
2611
+
2612
+
2613
+ 1
2614
+ |DS|
2615
+
2616
+ (s,a)∈DS
2617
+ h
2618
+ φh(s, a) −
2619
+ 1
2620
+ |DE|
2621
+
2622
+ (s,a)∈DE
2623
+ h
2624
+ φh(s, a)
2625
+
2626
+ � ¯θh < 0.
2627
+ With the above two inequalities, we can derive that θ⋆
2628
+ h ¯θh > 0. Then we have that
2629
+ ∆h(θ⋆
2630
+ h) =
2631
+ min
2632
+ (s,a)∈DE
2633
+ h ∪DS,1
2634
+ h
2635
+ θ⋆
2636
+ hφh(s, a) −
2637
+ max
2638
+ (s′,a′)∈DS,2
2639
+ h
2640
+ θ⋆
2641
+ hφh(s′, a′)
2642
+ = θ⋆
2643
+ h
2644
+ ¯θh
2645
+
2646
+ min
2647
+ (s,a)∈DE
2648
+ h ∪DS,1
2649
+ h
2650
+ ¯θhφh(s, a) −
2651
+ max
2652
+ (s′,a′)∈DS,2
2653
+ h
2654
+ ¯θhφh(s′, a′)
2655
+
2656
+ = θ⋆
2657
+ h
2658
+ ¯θh
2659
+ ∆h( ¯θh)
2660
+ > 0.
2661
+ Thus, the sufficiency of condition (19) is proved. Next, we prove the necessity of condition (19). That is, if
2662
+ ∆h(θ⋆
2663
+ h) > 0, then
2664
+ 1
2665
+ |DS|
2666
+
2667
+ (s,a)∈DS
2668
+ h
2669
+ ⟨φh(s, a), ¯θh⟩ <
2670
+ 1
2671
+ |DE|
2672
+
2673
+ (s′,a′)∈DS
2674
+ h
2675
+ ⟨φh(s′, a′), ¯θh⟩.
2676
+ Then we aim to prove that θ⋆
2677
+ h ¯θh > 0. It is easy to obtain that θ⋆
2678
+ h ̸= 0 and ¯θh ̸= 0 since ∆h(θ⋆
2679
+ h) > 0 and
2680
+ ∆h( ¯θh) > 0. Then we consider two cases where ¯θh > 0 and ¯θh < 0.
2681
+ • Case I ( ¯θh > 0). In this case, we have that
2682
+ ∆h( ¯θh) =
2683
+ min
2684
+ (s,a)∈DE
2685
+ h ∪DS,1
2686
+ h
2687
+ ¯θhφh(s, a) −
2688
+ max
2689
+ (s′,a′)∈DS,2
2690
+ h
2691
+ ¯θhφh(s′, a′)
2692
+ = ¯θh
2693
+
2694
+ min
2695
+ (s,a)∈DE
2696
+ h ∪DS,1
2697
+ h
2698
+ φh(s, a) −
2699
+ max
2700
+ (s′,a′)∈DS,2
2701
+ h
2702
+ φh(s′, a′)
2703
+
2704
+ .
2705
+ Then ∆h( ¯θh) > 0 implies that
2706
+ min
2707
+ (s,a)∈DE
2708
+ h ∪DS,1
2709
+ h
2710
+ φh(s, a) >
2711
+ max
2712
+ (s′,a′)∈DS,2
2713
+ h
2714
+ φh(s′, a′).
2715
+ (21)
2716
+ Then we claim that θ⋆
2717
+ h > 0. Otherwise, it holds that
2718
+ ∆h(θ⋆
2719
+ h) =
2720
+ min
2721
+ (s,a)∈DE
2722
+ h ∪DS,1
2723
+ h
2724
+ θ⋆
2725
+ hφh(s, a) −
2726
+ max
2727
+ (s′,a′)∈DS,2
2728
+ h
2729
+ θ⋆
2730
+ hφh(s′, a′)
2731
+ = θ⋆
2732
+ h
2733
+
2734
+ max
2735
+ (s,a)∈DE
2736
+ h ∪DS,1
2737
+ h
2738
+ φh(s, a) −
2739
+ min
2740
+ (s′,a′)∈DS,2
2741
+ h
2742
+ φh(s′, a′)
2743
+
2744
+ < 0.
2745
+ The last inequality follows θ⋆
2746
+ h < 0 and max(s,a)∈DE
2747
+ h ∪DS,1
2748
+ h φh(s, a) − min(s′,a′)∈DS,2
2749
+ h φh(s′, a′) > 0 due to
2750
+ inequality (21). Thus, the above inequality conflicts with ∆h(θ⋆
2751
+ h) > 0. The claim that θ⋆
2752
+ h > 0 is proved
2753
+ and ¯θhθ⋆
2754
+ h > 0.
2755
+ • Case II ( ¯θh < 0). Similarly, we get that
2756
+ ∆h( ¯θh) =
2757
+ min
2758
+ (s,a)∈DE
2759
+ h ∪DS,1
2760
+ h
2761
+ ¯θhφh(s, a) −
2762
+ max
2763
+ (s′,a′)∈DS,2
2764
+ h
2765
+ ¯θhφh(s′, a′)
2766
+ = ¯θh
2767
+
2768
+ max
2769
+ (s,a)∈DE
2770
+ h ∪DS,1
2771
+ h
2772
+ φh(s, a) −
2773
+ min
2774
+ (s′,a′)∈DS,2
2775
+ h
2776
+ φh(s′, a′)
2777
+
2778
+ .
2779
+ 26
2780
+
2781
+ Then ∆h( ¯θh) > 0 implies that
2782
+ max
2783
+ (s,a)∈DE
2784
+ h ∪DS,1
2785
+ h
2786
+ φh(s, a) <
2787
+ min
2788
+ (s′,a′)∈DS,2
2789
+ h
2790
+ φh(s′, a′).
2791
+ (22)
2792
+ Similar to the analysis in case I, we claim that θ⋆
2793
+ h < 0. Otherwise, it holds that
2794
+ ∆h(θ⋆
2795
+ h) =
2796
+ min
2797
+ (s,a)∈DE
2798
+ h ∪DS,1
2799
+ h
2800
+ θ⋆
2801
+ hφh(s, a) −
2802
+ max
2803
+ (s′,a′)∈DS,2
2804
+ h
2805
+ θ⋆
2806
+ hφh(s′, a′)
2807
+ = θ⋆
2808
+ h
2809
+
2810
+ min
2811
+ (s,a)∈DE
2812
+ h ∪DS,1
2813
+ h
2814
+ φh(s, a) −
2815
+ max
2816
+ (s′,a′)∈DS,2
2817
+ h
2818
+ φh(s′, a′)
2819
+
2820
+ < 0.
2821
+ The last inequality follows θ⋆
2822
+ h > 0 and min(s,a)∈DE
2823
+ h ∪DS,1
2824
+ h φh(s, a) − max(s′,a′)∈DS,2
2825
+ h φh(s′, a′) < 0 due to
2826
+ inequality (22). Thus, the above inequality conflicts with ∆h(θ⋆
2827
+ h) > 0. The claim that θ⋆
2828
+ h < 0 is proved
2829
+ and ¯θhθ⋆
2830
+ h > 0.
2831
+ To summarize, we have proved that ¯θhθ⋆
2832
+ h > 0. Similar to the proof of the sufficient condition, by the convexity
2833
+ of Lh(θh) and optimality of θ⋆
2834
+ h, we can obtain that
2835
+
2836
+
2837
+ 1
2838
+ |DS|
2839
+
2840
+ (s,a)∈DS
2841
+ h
2842
+ φh(s, a) −
2843
+ 1
2844
+ |DE|
2845
+
2846
+ (s,a)∈DE
2847
+ h
2848
+ φh(s, a)
2849
+
2850
+ � θ⋆
2851
+ h < 0.
2852
+ This directly implies that
2853
+
2854
+
2855
+ 1
2856
+ |DS|
2857
+
2858
+ (s,a)∈DS
2859
+ h
2860
+ φh(s, a) −
2861
+ 1
2862
+ |DE|
2863
+
2864
+ (s,a)∈DE
2865
+ h
2866
+ φh(s, a)
2867
+
2868
+ � ¯θh < 0,
2869
+ which completes the proof of necessity.
2870
+ C
2871
+ Behavioral Cloning with General Function Approximation
2872
+ In the main text, the theoretical analysis for BC-based algorithms considers the tabular setting in policy
2873
+ learning where a table function represents the policy. Here we provide an analysis of BC with general function
2874
+ approximation in policy learning. Notice that the algorithms considered in this paper (i.e., BC, NBCU and
2875
+ WBCU) can be unified under the framework of maximum likelihood estimation (MLE)11. Therefore, the
2876
+ theoretical results in the main text can also be extended to the setting of general function approximation by a
2877
+ similar analysis.
2878
+ We consider BC with general function approximation, which is the foundation of analyzing NBCU and
2879
+ WBCU. In particular, we assume access to a policy class Π = {π = (π1, π2, . . . , πh) : πh ∈ Πh, ∀h ∈ [H]}
2880
+ and Πh = {πh : S → ∆(A)}, where πh could be any function (e.g., neural networks). For simplicity of
2881
+ analysis, we assume that Π is a finite policy class. The objective of BC is still
2882
+ πBC ∈ max
2883
+ π∈Π
2884
+ H
2885
+
2886
+ h=1
2887
+
2888
+ (s,a)∈S×A
2889
+
2890
+ dE
2891
+ h(s, a) log πh(a|s),
2892
+ but we do not have the analytic solution as in Equation (2).
2893
+ 11Among these algorithms, the main difference is the weight function in the MLE objective; see Equations (1), (3) and (10).
2894
+ 27
2895
+
2896
+ Theorem 7. Under Assumption 1. In the general function approximation, additionally assume that πE ∈ Π, we have
2897
+ E
2898
+
2899
+ V(πE) − V(πBC)
2900
+
2901
+ ≲ min
2902
+
2903
+
2904
+ �H, H2
2905
+
2906
+ log(|Π|HNE)
2907
+ NE
2908
+
2909
+
2910
+
2911
+ Compared with Theorem 1, we find that the only change in theoretical bound is that O(|S|/NE) is
2912
+ replaced with O(
2913
+
2914
+ log(|Π|)/NE). We note that such a change also holds for other algorithms (e.g., NBCU
2915
+ and WBCU). Therefore, our theoretical implications remains unchanged.
2916
+ Proof of Theorem 7. We apply the policy difference lemma in [Kakade and Langford, 2002] and obtain that
2917
+ V(πE) − V(πBC) =
2918
+ H
2919
+
2920
+ h=1
2921
+ Esh∼dπE
2922
+ h (·)
2923
+
2924
+ QπBC
2925
+ h
2926
+ (sh, πE
2927
+ h (sh)) − ∑
2928
+ a∈A
2929
+ πBC
2930
+ h (·|sh)QπBC
2931
+ h
2932
+ (sh, a)
2933
+
2934
+
2935
+ H
2936
+
2937
+ h=1
2938
+ Esh∼dπE
2939
+ h (·)
2940
+
2941
+ QπBC
2942
+ h
2943
+ (sh, πE
2944
+ h (sh))(1 − πBC
2945
+ h (πE
2946
+ h (sh)|sh))
2947
+
2948
+ ≤ H
2949
+ H
2950
+
2951
+ h=1
2952
+ Es∼dπE
2953
+ h (·)
2954
+
2955
+ Ea∼πBC
2956
+ h (·|s)
2957
+
2958
+ I
2959
+
2960
+ a ̸= πE
2961
+ h (s)
2962
+ ���
2963
+ = H
2964
+ H
2965
+
2966
+ h=1
2967
+ Esh∼dE
2968
+ h(·)
2969
+
2970
+ TV
2971
+
2972
+ πE
2973
+ h (·|sh), πBC
2974
+ h (·|sh)
2975
+ ��
2976
+ .
2977
+ With Theorem 21 in [Agarwal et al., 2020], when |DE| ≥ 1, for any δ ∈ (0, 1), with probability at least 1 − δ
2978
+ over the randomness within DE, we have that
2979
+ Esh∼dE
2980
+ h(·)
2981
+
2982
+ TV2 �
2983
+ πE
2984
+ h (·|sh), πBC
2985
+ h (·|sh)
2986
+ ��
2987
+ ≤ 2log(|Π|/δ)
2988
+ |DE|
2989
+ .
2990
+ With union bound, with probability at least 1 − δ, for all h ∈ [H], it holds that
2991
+ Esh∼dE
2992
+ h(·)
2993
+
2994
+ TV2 �
2995
+ πE
2996
+ h (·|sh), πBC
2997
+ h (·|sh)
2998
+ ��
2999
+ ≤ 2log(|Π|H/δ)
3000
+ |DE|
3001
+ ,
3002
+ which implies that
3003
+ V(πE) − V(πBC) ≤ H
3004
+ H
3005
+
3006
+ h=1
3007
+ Esh∼dE
3008
+ h(·)
3009
+
3010
+ TV
3011
+
3012
+ πE
3013
+ h (·|sh), πBC
3014
+ h (·|sh)
3015
+ ��
3016
+ (a)
3017
+ ≤ H
3018
+ H
3019
+
3020
+ h=1
3021
+
3022
+ Esh∼dE
3023
+ h(·)
3024
+
3025
+ TV2 �
3026
+ πE
3027
+ h (·|sh), πBC
3028
+ h (·|sh)
3029
+ ��
3030
+
3031
+
3032
+ 2H2
3033
+
3034
+ log(|Π|H/δ)
3035
+ |DE|
3036
+ .
3037
+ Inequality (a) follows Jensen’s inequality. Taking expectation over the randomness within DE yields that
3038
+ EDE
3039
+
3040
+ V(πE) − V(πBC)
3041
+
3042
+ ≤ δH + (1 − δ)
3043
+
3044
+ 2H2
3045
+
3046
+ log(|Π|H/δ)
3047
+ |DE|
3048
+ (a)
3049
+ =
3050
+ H
3051
+ 2|DE| +
3052
+
3053
+ 1 −
3054
+ 1
3055
+ 2|DE|
3056
+ � √
3057
+ 2H2
3058
+
3059
+ log(2|Π|H|DE|)
3060
+ |DE|
3061
+
3062
+ �√
3063
+ 2 + 1
3064
+
3065
+ H2
3066
+
3067
+ log(2|Π|H|DE|)
3068
+ |DE|
3069
+ 28
3070
+
3071
+ ≤ 4H2
3072
+
3073
+ log(4|Π|H|DE|)
3074
+ |DE|
3075
+ .
3076
+ Equation (a) holds due to the choice that δ = 1/(2|DE|). For |DE| = 0, we directly have that
3077
+ EDE
3078
+
3079
+ V(πE) − V(πBC)
3080
+
3081
+ ≤ H.
3082
+ Therefore, for any |DE| ≥ 0, we have that
3083
+ EDE
3084
+
3085
+ V(πE) − V(πBC)
3086
+
3087
+ ≤ 4H2
3088
+
3089
+ log(4|Π|H max{|DE|, 1})
3090
+ max{|DE|, 1}
3091
+ .
3092
+ We consider a real-valued function f (x) = log(cx)/x, ∀x ≥ 1, where c = 4|Π|H. Its gradient function is
3093
+ f ′(x) = (1 − log(cx))/x2 ≤ 0, ∀x ≥ 1. Then we know that f (x) is decreasing as x increases. Furthermore,
3094
+ we have that max{|DE|, 1} ≥ (|DE| + 1)/2, ∀|DE| ≥ 0. Then we obtain
3095
+ EDE
3096
+
3097
+ V(πE) − V(πBC)
3098
+
3099
+ ≤ 4H2
3100
+
3101
+ log(4|Π|H max{|DE|, 1})
3102
+ max{|DE|, 1}
3103
+ ≤ 4H2
3104
+
3105
+ 2 log(4|Π|H(|DE| + 1))
3106
+ |DE| + 1
3107
+ .
3108
+ Taking expectation over the random variable |DE| ∼ Bin(Ntot, η) yields that
3109
+ E
3110
+
3111
+ V(πE) − V(πBC)
3112
+
3113
+ ≤ 4H2E
3114
+ ��
3115
+ 2 log(4|Π|H(|DE| + 1))
3116
+ |DE| + 1
3117
+
3118
+ (a)
3119
+ ≤ 4H2
3120
+
3121
+ E
3122
+ �2 log(4|Π|H(|DE| + 1))
3123
+ |DE| + 1
3124
+
3125
+ .
3126
+ Inequality (a) follows Jensen’s inequality. We consider the function g(x) = −x log(x/c), ∀x ∈ (0, 1], where
3127
+ c = 4|Π|H.
3128
+ g′(x) = −(log(x/c) + 1) ≥ 0, g′′(x) = − 1
3129
+ x ≤ 0, ∀x ∈ (0, 1].
3130
+ Thus, g(x) is a concave function. By Jensen’s inequality, we have that E[g(x)] ≤ g(E[x]). Then we can
3131
+ derive that
3132
+ E
3133
+
3134
+ V(πE) − V(πBC)
3135
+
3136
+ ≤ 4H2
3137
+
3138
+ E
3139
+ �2 log(4|Π|H(|DE| + 1))
3140
+ |DE| + 1
3141
+
3142
+ = 4
3143
+
3144
+ 2H2
3145
+
3146
+ E
3147
+
3148
+ g
3149
+
3150
+ 1
3151
+ |DE| + 1
3152
+ ��
3153
+ ≤ 4
3154
+
3155
+ 2H2
3156
+
3157
+ g
3158
+
3159
+ E
3160
+
3161
+ 1
3162
+ |DE| + 1
3163
+ ��
3164
+ (a)
3165
+ ≤ 4
3166
+
3167
+ 2H2
3168
+
3169
+ g
3170
+ � 1
3171
+ NE
3172
+
3173
+ ≤ 4
3174
+
3175
+ 2H2
3176
+
3177
+ log(4|Π|HNE)
3178
+ NE
3179
+ .
3180
+ In inequality (a), we use the facts that g′(x) ≥ 0 and E
3181
+
3182
+ 1/(|DE| + 1)
3183
+ � ≤ 1/NE from Lemma 3. We complete
3184
+ the proof.
3185
+ 29
3186
+
3187
+ D
3188
+ Experiments
3189
+ D.1
3190
+ Experiment Details
3191
+ Dataset Collection. We train an online SAC agent [Haarnoja et al., 2018] with 1 million steps using the rlkit
3192
+ codebase12, which is the same as benchmark dataset D4RL13. We use the deterministic policy as the expert
3193
+ policy, which is common in the literature [Ho and Ermon, 2016] since the deterministic policy usually gives a
3194
+ better performance than the stochastic policy; see Figure 5 for the training curves of online SAC.
3195
+ 0.00
3196
+ 0.25
3197
+ 0.50
3198
+ 0.75
3199
+ 1.00
3200
+ Interaction Step
3201
+ 1e6
3202
+ 0
3203
+ 1000
3204
+ 2000
3205
+ 3000
3206
+ 4000
3207
+ 5000
3208
+ 6000
3209
+ Evaluation Return
3210
+ Ant-v2
3211
+ 0.00
3212
+ 0.25
3213
+ 0.50
3214
+ 0.75
3215
+ 1.00
3216
+ Interaction Step
3217
+ 1e6
3218
+ 2500
3219
+ 0
3220
+ 2500
3221
+ 5000
3222
+ 7500
3223
+ 10000
3224
+ 12500
3225
+ HalfCheetah-v2
3226
+ 0.00
3227
+ 0.25
3228
+ 0.50
3229
+ 0.75
3230
+ 1.00
3231
+ Interaction Step
3232
+ 1e6
3233
+ 0
3234
+ 800
3235
+ 1600
3236
+ 2400
3237
+ 3200
3238
+ 4000
3239
+ Hopper-v2
3240
+ 0.00
3241
+ 0.25
3242
+ 0.50
3243
+ 0.75
3244
+ 1.00
3245
+ Interaction Step
3246
+ 1e6
3247
+ 0
3248
+ 1000
3249
+ 2000
3250
+ 3000
3251
+ 4000
3252
+ 5000
3253
+ Walker2d-v2
3254
+ Figure 5: Training curves of online SAC.
3255
+ In our experiments, the expert dataset has 1 expert trajectory that is collected by the trained SAC agent.
3256
+ Two tasks differ in the supplementary dataset.
3257
+ Noisy Expert Task. The supplementary dataset has 10 clean expert trajectories and 5 noisy expert
3258
+ trajectories. For noisy trajectories, the action labels are replaced with random actions (drawn from [−1, 1]).
3259
+ Full Replay Task. The supplementary dataset is from the replay buffer of the online SAC agent, which
3260
+ has 1 million samples (roughly 1000+ trajectories).
3261
+ Algorithm Implementation. The implementation of DemoDICE is based on the original authors’ code-
3262
+ base14. Same as DWBC15. We have fine-tuned the hyper-parameters of DemoDICE and DWBC in our
3263
+ experiments but find that the default parameters given by these authors work well. Following [Kim et al.,
3264
+ 2022b], we normalize state observations in the dataset before training for all algorithms.
3265
+ We use gradient penalty (GP) regularization in training the discriminator of WBCU. Specifically, we add
3266
+ the following loss to the original loss (7):
3267
+ min
3268
+ θ
3269
+ (∥g(s, a; θ)∥ − 1)2 ,
3270
+ where g is the gradient of the discriminator c(s, a; θ).
3271
+ The implementation of NBCU and WBCU is adapted from DemoDICE’s. In particular, both the discrimi-
3272
+ nator and policy networks use the 2-layers MLP with 256 hidden units and ReLU activation. The batch size
3273
+ is 256 and learning rate (using the Adam optimizer) is 0.0003 for both the discriminator and policy. The
3274
+ number of training iterations is 1 million. We use δ = 0 and GP=1, unless mentioned. Please refer to our
3275
+ codebase16 for details.
3276
+ All experiments are run with 5 random seeds.
3277
+ D.2
3278
+ Additional Results
3279
+ In this section, we report the exact performance of trained policies for each MuJoCo locomotion control task.
3280
+ Training curves are displayed in Figure 8 and Figure 9. The evaluation performance of the last 10 iterations
3281
+ is reported in Table 2 and Table 3. The normalized score on a particular environment is calculated by the
3282
+ 12https://github.com/rail-berkeley/rlkit
3283
+ 13https://github.com/Farama-Foundation/D4RL
3284
+ 14https://github.com/KAIST-AILab/imitation-dice
3285
+ 15https://github.com/ryanxhr/DWBC
3286
+ 16https://github.com/liziniu/ILwSD
3287
+ 30
3288
+
3289
+ following formula.
3290
+ Normalized Score =
3291
+ Algorithm Performance − Random Policy Performance
3292
+ Expert Policy Performance − Random Policy Performance.
3293
+ In Table 2 and Table 3, the normalized score is averaged over 4 environments.
3294
+ Training curves of WBCU and DemoDICE with gradient penalty are displayed in Figure 10, Figure 11,
3295
+ Figure 12, and Figure 13.
3296
+ Noisy Expert
3297
+ Full Replay
3298
+ Task
3299
+ 0
3300
+ 20
3301
+ 40
3302
+ 60
3303
+ 80
3304
+ Normalized Score (%)
3305
+ 31
3306
+ 66
3307
+ 40
3308
+ 94
3309
+ 49
3310
+ 94
3311
+ Algorithm
3312
+ DemoDICE(GP=0)
3313
+ DemoDICE(GP=1)
3314
+ DemoDICE(GP=10)
3315
+ Figure 6: Averaged normalized scores of trained policies of DemoDICE with gradient penalty. Experiments
3316
+ show that the gradient penalty regularization also matters for DemoDICE.
3317
+ Table 2: Performance of the trained policies by BC, DemoDICE [Kim et al., 2022b], DWBC [Xu et al., 2022a],
3318
+ NBCU (Algorithm 1), and WBCU (Algorithm 2) on the noisy-expert task. Numbers correspond to the
3319
+ averaged evaluation return over 5 random seeds (± indicate the standard deviation); a lager return means
3320
+ better performance (same as other tables).
3321
+ Ant-v2
3322
+ HalfCheetah-v2
3323
+ Hopper-v2
3324
+ Walker2d-v2
3325
+ Normalized Score
3326
+ Random
3327
+ -325.6
3328
+ -280
3329
+ -20
3330
+ 2
3331
+ 0%
3332
+ Expert
3333
+ 5229
3334
+ 11115
3335
+ 3589
3336
+ 5082
3337
+ 100%
3338
+ BC
3339
+ 1759±287
3340
+ 931±273
3341
+ 2468±164
3342
+ 1738±311
3343
+ 38%
3344
+ DemoDICE(GP=0)
3345
+ 1893±181
3346
+ 2139±277
3347
+ 1823±169
3348
+ 563±34
3349
+ 31%
3350
+ DemoDICE(GP=1)
3351
+ 2492±235
3352
+ 5553±501
3353
+ 1320±319
3354
+ 1153±220
3355
+ 40%
3356
+ DemoDICE(GP=10)
3357
+ 2523±244
3358
+ 6020±346
3359
+ 1990±90
3360
+ 1685±160
3361
+ 49%
3362
+ DWBC
3363
+ 3270±238
3364
+ 5688±557
3365
+ 3317±59
3366
+ 1985±175
3367
+ 62%
3368
+ NBCU
3369
+ 3259±159
3370
+ 5561±539
3371
+ 558±23
3372
+ 518±56
3373
+ 35%
3374
+ WBCU(GP=0)
3375
+ 738±179
3376
+ 3828±333
3377
+ 2044±111
3378
+ 477±81
3379
+ 30%
3380
+ WBCU(GP=1)
3381
+ 2580±224
3382
+ 8274±488
3383
+ 3217±203
3384
+ 1932±329
3385
+ 64%
3386
+ WBCU(GP=10)
3387
+ 2130±259
3388
+ 7813±472
3389
+ 2930±229
3390
+ 1510±476
3391
+ 57%
3392
+ Remark 2. Readers may realize that NBCU actually is better than BC on the Ant-v2 and HalfCheetah-v2 environments
3393
+ for the noisy-expert task, which seems to contradict our theory. We clarify there is no contradiction. In fact, our theory
3394
+ implies that in the worst case, NBCU is worse than BC. As we have discussed in the main text, state coverage matters
3395
+ for NBCU’s performance. For the noisy expert task, we visualize the state coverage in Figure 7, where we use Kernel
3396
+ PCA17 to project states. In particular, we see that the state coverage is relatively nice on Ant-v2 and HalfCheetah-v2,
3397
+ 17https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.decomposition.KernelPCA.html. We use the “poly” ker-
3398
+ nel.
3399
+ 31
3400
+
3401
+ Table 3: Performance of the trained policies by BC, DemoDICE [Kim et al., 2022b], DWBC [Xu et al., 2022a],
3402
+ NBCU (Algorithm 1), and WBCU (Algorithm 2) on the full-replay task.
3403
+ Ant-v2
3404
+ HalfCheetah-v2
3405
+ Hopper-v2
3406
+ Walker2d-v2
3407
+ Normalized Score
3408
+ Random
3409
+ -325.6
3410
+ -280
3411
+ -20
3412
+ 2
3413
+ 0%
3414
+ Expert
3415
+ 5229
3416
+ 11115
3417
+ 3589
3418
+ 5082
3419
+ 100%
3420
+ BC
3421
+ 1759±287
3422
+ 931±273
3423
+ 2468±164
3424
+ 1738±311
3425
+ 38%
3426
+ DemoDICE(GP=0)
3427
+ 4650±216
3428
+ 9882±270
3429
+ 39±0
3430
+ 4149±288
3431
+ 66%
3432
+ DemoDICE(GP=1)
3433
+ 5009±98
3434
+ 10701±70
3435
+ 3427±104
3436
+ 4560±146
3437
+ 94%
3438
+ DemoDICE(GP=10)
3439
+ 5000±124
3440
+ 10781±67
3441
+ 3394±93
3442
+ 4537±125
3443
+ 94%
3444
+ DWBC
3445
+ 2951±155
3446
+ 1485±377
3447
+ 2567±88
3448
+ 1572±225
3449
+ 44%
3450
+ NBCU
3451
+ 4932±148
3452
+ 10566±86
3453
+ 3241±276
3454
+ 4462±105
3455
+ 92%
3456
+ WBCU(GP=0)
3457
+ 483±79
3458
+ −242±101
3459
+ 346±93
3460
+ 15±15
3461
+ 6%
3462
+ WBCU(GP=1)
3463
+ 4935±108
3464
+ 10729±74
3465
+ 3390±132
3466
+ 4509±142
3467
+ 94%
3468
+ WBCU(GP=10)
3469
+ 4858±95
3470
+ 10751±41
3471
+ 3436±37
3472
+ 4403±88
3473
+ 93%
3474
+ and somewhat bad on Hopper-v2 and Walker2d-v2. This can help explain the performance difference among these
3475
+ environments in Table 2.
3476
+ 32
3477
+
3478
+ 0
3479
+ 50
3480
+ 100
3481
+ 150
3482
+ 200
3483
+ 250
3484
+ 0
3485
+ 10
3486
+ 20
3487
+ 30
3488
+ 40
3489
+ DE
3490
+ DS, 1
3491
+ DS, 2
3492
+ (a) Ant-v2.
3493
+ 2.0
3494
+ 1.5
3495
+ 1.0
3496
+ 0.5
3497
+ 0.0
3498
+ 0.5
3499
+ 1.0
3500
+ 1.5
3501
+ 2.0
3502
+ 2
3503
+ 1
3504
+ 0
3505
+ 1
3506
+ 2
3507
+ DE
3508
+ DS, 1
3509
+ DS, 2
3510
+ (b) Halfcheetah-v2.
3511
+ 2
3512
+ 0
3513
+ 2
3514
+ 4
3515
+ 6
3516
+ 4
3517
+ 2
3518
+ 0
3519
+ 2
3520
+ 4
3521
+ DE
3522
+ DS, 1
3523
+ DS, 2
3524
+ (c) Hopper-v2.
3525
+ 3
3526
+ 2
3527
+ 1
3528
+ 0
3529
+ 1
3530
+ 2
3531
+ 3
3532
+ 4
3533
+ 2
3534
+ 0
3535
+ 2
3536
+ 4
3537
+ 6
3538
+ DE
3539
+ DS, 1
3540
+ DS, 2
3541
+ (d) Walker2d-v2.
3542
+ Figure 7: Visualization of the state coverage for the noisy expert task. According to the experiment set-up, red
3543
+ points correspond to good samples and blue points correspond to noisy and bad samples. Plots show that
3544
+ the state overlap between two modes of samples is large for Hopper-v2 and Walker2d-v2 and is limited for
3545
+ Ant-v2 and HalfCheetah-v2. Therefore, we can expect NBCU performs well on Ant-v2 and HalfCheetah-v2.
3546
+ 33
3547
+
3548
+ 3000
3549
+ 1500
3550
+ 0
3551
+ 1500
3552
+ 3000
3553
+ 4500
3554
+ 6000
3555
+ Evaluation Return
3556
+ Ant-v2
3557
+ 0
3558
+ 2500
3559
+ 5000
3560
+ 7500
3561
+ 10000
3562
+ HalfCheetah-v2
3563
+ BC
3564
+ DWBC
3565
+ DemoDICE
3566
+ Expert
3567
+ NBCU
3568
+ WBCU
3569
+ 0.00
3570
+ 0.25
3571
+ 0.50
3572
+ 0.75
3573
+ 1.00
3574
+ Gradient Step
3575
+ 1e6
3576
+ 0
3577
+ 800
3578
+ 1600
3579
+ 2400
3580
+ 3200
3581
+ 4000
3582
+ Hopper-v2
3583
+ 0.00
3584
+ 0.25
3585
+ 0.50
3586
+ 0.75
3587
+ 1.00
3588
+ Gradient Step
3589
+ 1e6
3590
+ 0
3591
+ 1500
3592
+ 3000
3593
+ 4500
3594
+ 6000
3595
+ Walker2d-v2
3596
+ Figure 8: Training curves of BC, DemoDICE [Kim et al., 2022b], DWBC [Xu et al., 2022a], NBCU (Algorithm 1),
3597
+ and WBCU (Algorithm 2) on the noisy expert task. Solid lines correspond to the mean performance and
3598
+ shaded regions correspond to the 95% confidence interval. Same as other figures.
3599
+ 0
3600
+ 1500
3601
+ 3000
3602
+ 4500
3603
+ 6000
3604
+ Evaluation Return
3605
+ Ant-v2
3606
+ 0
3607
+ 2500
3608
+ 5000
3609
+ 7500
3610
+ 10000
3611
+ HalfCheetah-v2
3612
+ BC
3613
+ DWBC
3614
+ DemoDICE
3615
+ Expert
3616
+ NBCU
3617
+ WBCU
3618
+ 0.00
3619
+ 0.25
3620
+ 0.50
3621
+ 0.75
3622
+ 1.00
3623
+ Gradient Step
3624
+ 1e6
3625
+ 0
3626
+ 800
3627
+ 1600
3628
+ 2400
3629
+ 3200
3630
+ 4000
3631
+ Hopper-v2
3632
+ 0.00
3633
+ 0.25
3634
+ 0.50
3635
+ 0.75
3636
+ 1.00
3637
+ Gradient Step
3638
+ 1e6
3639
+ 0
3640
+ 1500
3641
+ 3000
3642
+ 4500
3643
+ 6000
3644
+ Walker2d-v2
3645
+ Figure 9: Training curves of BC, DemoDICE [Kim et al., 2022b], DWBC [Xu et al., 2022a], NBCU (Algorithm 1),
3646
+ and WBCU (Algorithm 2) on the full replay task.
3647
+ 34
3648
+
3649
+ 1500
3650
+ 0
3651
+ 1500
3652
+ 3000
3653
+ 4500
3654
+ 6000
3655
+ Evaluation Return
3656
+ Ant-v2
3657
+ 0
3658
+ 2500
3659
+ 5000
3660
+ 7500
3661
+ 10000
3662
+ HalfCheetah-v2
3663
+ Expert
3664
+ WBCU(GP=0.0)
3665
+ WBCU(GP=1.0)
3666
+ WBCU(GP=10.0)
3667
+ 0.00
3668
+ 0.25
3669
+ 0.50
3670
+ 0.75
3671
+ 1.00
3672
+ Gradient Step
3673
+ 1e6
3674
+ 0
3675
+ 800
3676
+ 1600
3677
+ 2400
3678
+ 3200
3679
+ 4000
3680
+ Hopper-v2
3681
+ 0.00
3682
+ 0.25
3683
+ 0.50
3684
+ 0.75
3685
+ 1.00
3686
+ Gradient Step
3687
+ 1e6
3688
+ 0
3689
+ 1500
3690
+ 3000
3691
+ 4500
3692
+ 6000
3693
+ Walker2d-v2
3694
+ Figure 10: Training curves of WBCU with gradient penalty on the noisy expert task.
3695
+ 0
3696
+ 1500
3697
+ 3000
3698
+ 4500
3699
+ 6000
3700
+ Evaluation Return
3701
+ Ant-v2
3702
+ 0
3703
+ 2500
3704
+ 5000
3705
+ 7500
3706
+ 10000
3707
+ HalfCheetah-v2
3708
+ Expert
3709
+ WBCU(GP=0.0)
3710
+ WBCU(GP=1.0)
3711
+ WBCU(GP=10.0)
3712
+ 0.00
3713
+ 0.25
3714
+ 0.50
3715
+ 0.75
3716
+ 1.00
3717
+ Gradient Step
3718
+ 1e6
3719
+ 0
3720
+ 800
3721
+ 1600
3722
+ 2400
3723
+ 3200
3724
+ 4000
3725
+ Hopper-v2
3726
+ 0.00
3727
+ 0.25
3728
+ 0.50
3729
+ 0.75
3730
+ 1.00
3731
+ Gradient Step
3732
+ 1e6
3733
+ 0
3734
+ 1500
3735
+ 3000
3736
+ 4500
3737
+ 6000
3738
+ Walker2d-v2
3739
+ Figure 11: Training curves of WBCU with gradient penalty on the noisy expert task.
3740
+ 35
3741
+
3742
+ 3000
3743
+ 1500
3744
+ 0
3745
+ 1500
3746
+ 3000
3747
+ 4500
3748
+ 6000
3749
+ Evaluation Return
3750
+ Ant-v2
3751
+ 0
3752
+ 2500
3753
+ 5000
3754
+ 7500
3755
+ 10000
3756
+ HalfCheetah-v2
3757
+ DemoDICE(GP=0.0)
3758
+ DemoDICE(GP=1.0)
3759
+ DemoDICE(GP=10.0)
3760
+ Expert
3761
+ 0.00
3762
+ 0.25
3763
+ 0.50
3764
+ 0.75
3765
+ 1.00
3766
+ Gradient Step
3767
+ 1e6
3768
+ 0
3769
+ 800
3770
+ 1600
3771
+ 2400
3772
+ 3200
3773
+ 4000
3774
+ Hopper-v2
3775
+ 0.00
3776
+ 0.25
3777
+ 0.50
3778
+ 0.75
3779
+ 1.00
3780
+ Gradient Step
3781
+ 1e6
3782
+ 0
3783
+ 1500
3784
+ 3000
3785
+ 4500
3786
+ 6000
3787
+ Walker2d-v2
3788
+ Figure 12: Training curves of DemoDICE with gradient penalty on the full replay task.
3789
+ 0
3790
+ 1500
3791
+ 3000
3792
+ 4500
3793
+ 6000
3794
+ Evaluation Return
3795
+ Ant-v2
3796
+ 0
3797
+ 2500
3798
+ 5000
3799
+ 7500
3800
+ 10000
3801
+ HalfCheetah-v2
3802
+ DemoDICE(GP=0.0)
3803
+ DemoDICE(GP=1.0)
3804
+ DemoDICE(GP=10.0)
3805
+ Expert
3806
+ 0.00
3807
+ 0.25
3808
+ 0.50
3809
+ 0.75
3810
+ 1.00
3811
+ Gradient Step
3812
+ 1e6
3813
+ 0
3814
+ 800
3815
+ 1600
3816
+ 2400
3817
+ 3200
3818
+ 4000
3819
+ Hopper-v2
3820
+ 0.00
3821
+ 0.25
3822
+ 0.50
3823
+ 0.75
3824
+ 1.00
3825
+ Gradient Step
3826
+ 1e6
3827
+ 0
3828
+ 1500
3829
+ 3000
3830
+ 4500
3831
+ 6000
3832
+ Walker2d-v2
3833
+ Figure 13: Training curves of DemoDICE with gradient penalty on the full replay task.
3834
+ 36
3835
+
btFJT4oBgHgl3EQf9S1J/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
cdE2T4oBgHgl3EQfwgij/content/tmp_files/2301.04102v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1715 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Under consideration for publication in J. Fluid Mech.
2
+ 1
3
+ Banner appropriate to article type will appear here in typeset article
4
+ Effects of porous substrates on the structure of
5
+ turbulent boundary layers
6
+ P. Jaiswal1 and B. Ganapathisubramani1†
7
+ 1Aerodynamics & Flight Mechanics Group, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 7QF, UK
8
+ (Received xx; revised xx; accepted xx)
9
+ Three different porous substrates (with different pore sizes, 𝑠 and permeabilities, 𝐾) are
10
+ used to examine their effect on the structure of boundary layer flow over them. The flow
11
+ is characterised with single-point hot-wire measurements as well as planar Particle Image
12
+ Velocimetry. In order to elucidate differences in shallow and deep flows past porous substrate,
13
+ foams with two different thickness (ℎ) are used (for all three substrates). A wide range of
14
+ Friction Reynolds number (2000 < 𝑅𝑒𝜏 < 13500) and Permeability based Reynolds number
15
+ (1 < 𝑅𝑒𝐾 < 50) are attained. For substrates with 𝑅𝑒𝐾 ∼ 1, the flow behaviour remains
16
+ similar to flow over impermeable smooth walls and as such Townsend’s hypothesis remains
17
+ valid. In contrast, a substantial reduction in velocity disturbances and associated length
18
+ scales is achieved for permeable (𝑅𝑒𝐾 > 1) and dense (relative to viscous scales, 𝑠+ < 60)
19
+ foam at the thick substrate limit (ℎ/𝑠 > 10), which leads to the breakdown of outer-layer
20
+ similarity. As porosity is increased, a thin substrate limit is reached (ℎ/𝑠), and the foam
21
+ becomes sparse relative to viscous scales (𝑠+ > 100). For such foams, the flow conforms
22
+ to outer-layer similarity and is more akin to flow over rough surfaces. Such substrates are
23
+ unable to attenuate velocity disturbances and the dependence of substrate thickness (ℎ/𝑠) on
24
+ spectral energy content of turbulent fluctuations ceases to exist. The present study shows that
25
+ transition from thick to thin substrate flow behaviour depends not only on thickness-to-pore
26
+ ratio (ℎ/𝑠) but also on substrate density relative to viscous scales of the flow (𝑠+).
27
+ Key words: Authors should not enter keywords on the manuscript, as these must be chosen by
28
+ the author during the online submission process and will then be added during the typesetting
29
+ process (see Keyword PDF for the full list). Other classifications will be added at the same
30
+ time.
31
+ MSC Codes (Optional) Please enter your MSC Codes here
32
+ 1. Introduction
33
+ Turbulent flow over and past porous surfaces is encountered in many engineering problems,
34
+ ranging from flow over forest canopies (Finnigan 2000) to flows over and past river beds
35
+ † Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
36
+ Abstract must not spill onto p.2
37
+ arXiv:2301.04102v1 [physics.flu-dyn] 10 Jan 2023
38
+
39
+ 2
40
+ (Yovogan & Degan 2013). This makes the understanding of the flow behaviour over porous
41
+ surfaces crucial. For a porous substrate, Rosti et al. (2015) showed that compared to porosity
42
+ small changes in permeability can significantly alter the turbulence dynamics. The effects
43
+ of wall-permeability for flows over and past porous foams was further studied in detail by
44
+ Hahn et al. (2002); Breugem et al. (2006). Breugem et al. (2006) suggested that an isotropic
45
+ porous substrate could be fully defined by three length scales, which are the square root
46
+ of material permeability
47
+
48
+ 𝐾, the substrate thickness ℎ, and the characteristic size of the
49
+ ‘roughness’ elements composing the substrate 𝑑𝑝. Breugem et al. (2006) stated that the
50
+ effect of permeability on the flow is isolated if three conditions are meet: i) the wall thickness
51
+ is larger than the flow penetration into the substrate, ii) the roughness Reynolds number
52
+ 𝑅𝑒𝑑 = 𝑑𝑝𝑈𝜏/𝜈 is small (𝑅𝑒𝑑 << 70, where 𝑈𝜏 is the skin-friction velocity and 𝜈 is the
53
+ kinematic viscosity) and iii) the permeability Reynolds number 𝑅𝑒𝐾 =
54
+
55
+ 𝐾𝑈𝜏/𝜈 is high
56
+ (𝑅𝑒𝐾 >> 1).
57
+ Studies by Breugem et al. (2006) and Manes et al. (2011) were able to meet the above
58
+ mentioned criterion. Therefore, the effect of surface roughness can be neglected. It was shown
59
+ that permeable wall can substantially alter eddy blocking, quasi-streamwise vortices and no
60
+ slip at the wall (see Breugem et al. 2006, for instance). The modification of these properties
61
+ by permeable wall, which are trademarks of the turbulent boundary layer, leads to a departure
62
+ from outer-layer similarity in velocity statistics. Furthermore, the impact of permeable wall
63
+ can also be felt by large-scale structures, and leads to non-existence of logarithmic mean
64
+ velocity law (Breugem et al. 2006). Similarly, the wall roughness, by itself, can also alter
65
+ turbulence dynamics by destroying non-linear self-sustaining cycles of turbulence (Jiménez
66
+ 2004). Although these mechanisms for permeable and rough surfaces are well reported in
67
+ the literature, yet their relative contribution and interactions towards boundary-layer scales
68
+ over a porous material, which is both rough and permeable, remains a matter for further
69
+ investigation.
70
+ One such aspect is the existence of Townsend’s outer-layer hypothesis (Townsend 1980)
71
+ for a porous wall. According to Townsend’s hypothesis the outer layer flow is independent
72
+ of the near-wall region; therefore, for a flow over a wall, the primary effect of the wall is
73
+ impermeability and no-slip boundary condition. To this end several studies have demonstrated
74
+ its validity for smooth walls (Chung et al. 2014). Townsend’s hypothesis has also been found
75
+ to be valid for flow over rough walls, provided that the equivalent sand roughness height 𝑘𝑠
76
+ is small compared to the boundary-layer thickness (Jiménez 2004). Therefore, in contrast to
77
+ wall-permeability, the surface roughness with a reasonable scale separation (low 𝑘𝑠/𝛿) does
78
+ not affect the logarithmic mean profiles and large-scale structures remain intact. In contrast
79
+ for flows past porous surfaces, Breugem et al. (2006) and Suga et al. (2010) found that the
80
+ outer-layer hypothesis holds for all but the wall-normal velocity component. Breugem et al.
81
+ (2006) ascribed the absence of self-similarity in the wall-normal velocity profiles to the
82
+ weakening of wall-blocking. The weakening of wall-blocking opens a path for inner-outer
83
+ boundary layer communications through enhanced ejections and sweep (Breugem et al.
84
+ 2006) compared to a solid impermeable (smooth or rough) wall. Breugem et al. (2006) argue
85
+ that the enhanced ejections and sweep are sufficient to nullify Townsend’s hypothesis, which
86
+ requires the absence of inner layer scales influencing the outer wall flows. However, they
87
+ (Suga et al. 2010; Breugem et al. 2006) were unable to decisively conclude if absence of
88
+ outer-layer scaling is due to permeability or insufficient separation of scales because Breugem
89
+ et al.’s (2006) numerical simulations were performed at a low Reynolds number.
90
+ To overcome the limitation of the low Reynolds number that can be achieved with DNS,
91
+ Manes et al. (2011) performed experimental measurements at a higher Reynolds number.
92
+ Manes et al.’s (2011) data confirm the validity of Townsend’s outer-layer similarity hypothesis
93
+
94
+ 3
95
+ for all the velocity components, for porous foams with negligible surface roughness. However,
96
+ the thickness of their (Manes et al. 2011) porous substrate was much greater than the pore
97
+ size. As such, their study is equivalent to flow past deep canopies (Sharma & García-Mayoral
98
+ 2020b), where the effect of foam thickness is no longer a relevant parameter.
99
+ The analogy between flows past foams and canopies has been hypothesized by Efstathiou
100
+ & Luhar (2018). Efstathiou & Luhar (2018) were able to show the effect of substrate thickness
101
+ on the turbulent boundary layer, and near-wall flow physics by investigating porous materials
102
+ with different ℎ/𝑠 ratio. Efstathiou & Luhar (2018) claim that the transition from thick to
103
+ thin substrate behaviour occurs when the thickness and diameter of the porous substrate
104
+ are of the same order of magnitude. One may argue that these porous materials, whose
105
+ thickness and pore diameter are of the same order of magnitude, can be considered a
106
+ “rough” wall. Consequently, for porous foams with thin substrate thickness, the relative
107
+ contribution of roughness should be higher than permeability in setting the turbulence
108
+ dynamics in the outer layer. In contrast, if the substrates thickness is an order of magnitude
109
+ higher than the pore size, we would expect permeability to play an important role in setting
110
+ the wall-boundary condition. Efstathiou & Luhar (2018) showed that for foams with finite
111
+ thickness, the existence of Townsend’s outer-layer hypothesis remains valid. The foams tested
112
+ by Efstathiou & Luhar (2018) had small values of permeability based Reynolds number
113
+ (𝑅𝑒𝐾), especially those at the thick substrate limit. This suggests that permeability based
114
+ scales were comparable to viscous scales in their study, as such it is unclear if the permeability
115
+ played a role in setting wall-boundary conditions for the cases tested by Efstathiou & Luhar
116
+ (2018). In addition to low values of 𝑅𝑒𝐾, Efstathiou & Luhar (2018) concluded the validity
117
+ of Townsend’s hypothesis solely based on wall-parallel velocity statistics. The wall-normal
118
+ statistics are especially sensitive to permeable surfaces as noted by Breugem et al. (2006);
119
+ therefore the validity of Townsend’s outer-layer hypothesis for porous (rough and permeable)
120
+ foams is an open question. Is the flow over such porous surfaces analogous to flows over
121
+ rough surfaces away from the wall? If so, does the outer-layer similarity in velocity statistics
122
+ holds for such porous foams? Thus the primary objective of the current paper is to test
123
+ Townsend’s outer-layer hypothesis at a high Reynolds number for turbulent flows past porous
124
+ foam with varying thicknesses, permeability and roughness.
125
+ A potential similarity between flows past canopies (Sharma & García-Mayoral 2020b)
126
+ and foam (Efstathiou & Luhar 2018) is that as the pore size is increased, a thin substrate
127
+ limit is achieved where the velocity profile becomes fuller, ultimately resulting in loss of
128
+ the inflection point. This ensures absence of any Kelvin-Helmholtz instability, which results
129
+ in reduction in wall-parallel velocity spectra compared to cases where Kelvin-Helmholtz
130
+ instability flow is present. Presence of KH instability was also reported by Kuwata & Suga’s
131
+ (2017), they observed that the pressure fluctuations were correlated all along the span. On
132
+ the one hand, numerical simulations (Motlagh & Taghizadeh 2016; Kuwata & Suga 2017)
133
+ have been performed at much lower Reynolds numbers compared to experimental studies,
134
+ on the other hand, experimental studies (Efstathiou & Luhar 2018) have reported this based
135
+ only single-point statistics and for cases. Therefore, in the current study, PIV measurements
136
+ were carried out for each wall topology. PIV inherently shows the flow structures, and one
137
+ does not have to rely on the assumption of frozen turbulence to recover spatial information
138
+ from temporal single-point velocity measurements.
139
+ The dual-component planar PIV allows for the quantification of the wall-normal velocity
140
+ disturbance field, which plays a decisive role in the generation of wall-pressure fluctuations
141
+ (see chapter 8 of Blake 2017, for instance). The wall-pressure field is the primary driver of
142
+ aerofoil self-noise, and changes in the two-point wall-normal velocity correlation have been
143
+ used to assess the impact of porous materials on aerofoil self-noise (see Carpio et al. 2019, for
144
+ instance). Carpio et al. (2019) showed that maximum noise reduction is achieved when the
145
+
146
+ 4
147
+ two-point correlation of the wall-normal velocity disturbances is lower for a permeable wall
148
+ compared to a solid wall. However, if the pore size is “too large” (hence high permeability), it
149
+ can result in an increase in the two-point correlation of the wall-normal velocity disturbances
150
+ (Carpio et al. 2019) and in the root mean square (RMS) values of wall-pressure (Breugem
151
+ et al. 2006). This suggests that, for trailing-edge noise attenuation, there is a range of pore
152
+ sizes and substrate thicknesses that can achieve noise reduction. Naturally, the question is
153
+ what values of pore thickness and size can we expect to reduce the correlation of wall-normal
154
+ velocity fluctuations?
155
+ Furthermore, in such applications (trailing-edge noise reduction), flow past porous foams
156
+ can transition from the thick foam limit (aerofoil mid-chord) to the thin foam limit (aerofoil
157
+ trailing edge). At finite thickness limit, roughness layer can dictate the efficacy wall-
158
+ permeability condition (White & Nepf 2007). Nevertheless, previous studies were, either
159
+ done at low permeability based Reynolds number (Efstathiou & Luhar 2018), or have
160
+ studied the flow past foams at deep/thick substrate limit (Manes et al. 2011), which is not
161
+ representative of porous foams used in trailing-edge noise applications. Therefore, the second
162
+ objective of this manuscript is to unravel flow structures present inflows over porous foam
163
+ with varying thicknesses, which can provide direct experimental evidence on the existence
164
+ or non-existence of KH type instability, and impact of porous substrates on the structure of
165
+ turbulent boundary layer. To our knowledge, this is the first study of the spatial structure of
166
+ turbulence over porous foams at high Reynolds number (𝑅𝑒𝜏 > 2000).
167
+ As argued by Finnigan et al. (2009) and Manes et al. (2011) the imprint of Kelvin-
168
+ helmoltz instability is best visible in streamwise velocity spectra. While Manes et al. (2011)
169
+ performed measurements only at the thick foam limits, Efstathiou & Luhar (2018) were
170
+ unable to report near-wall streamwise velocity spectra data due to noise. Additionally, both
171
+ these measurements were performed at the dense foam limit. Therefore, this study fills the
172
+ scientific gap by reporting streamwise energy spectra for flows over and past porous foams
173
+ with varying thicknesses and pore densities at high Reynolds numbers. Thus, third and final
174
+ objective of this study is to report wall-parallel turbulent kinetic energy spectra over a wide
175
+ range of foam thickness and density, and delineate their impact on the associated time scales
176
+ and turbulent energy.
177
+ 2. Methodology and outline
178
+ In the present paper, both transitionally and fully rough flows above porous foams will be
179
+ investigated at high Reynolds number. As the increase in porosity is achieved by increasing
180
+ the pore size of the foams, the thickness and pore-size ratio range from ℎ/𝑠 = 0.7 to
181
+ ℎ/𝑠 = 60. This allows investigation of differences between shallow and deep flows as the
182
+ thickness is varied. At the same time, increasing or decreasing pores per inch should also
183
+ permit one to cover the dense and sparse foam limits. If the nominal pore size (s) is taken as
184
+ the characteristic length scale to compute the roughness Reynolds number 𝑠+ = 𝑠𝑈𝜏/𝜈 (see
185
+ Efstathiou & Luhar 2018, for instance), then 𝑠+ for all but one case appears to be way beyond
186
+ the condition (Reynolds number based on roughness<< 70) to decouple permeability from
187
+ roughness (Breugem et al. 2006). Therefore, with the possible exception of thicker foam with
188
+ highest number of cells at lowest free-stream velocity (𝑈∞) tested, all the test cases should
189
+ experience both permeable and roughness effects. The present study aims to quantify the
190
+ effects of porous wall and its overarching influence on the structure of turbulent boundary
191
+ layer over the broadest range of Reynolds numbers. The Friction-based Reynolds number
192
+ (𝑅𝑒𝜏 = 𝑈𝜏𝛿99/𝜈 where 𝑈𝜏 is the skin friction velocity and 𝛿99 is the boundary layer
193
+ thickness) for the present study, was in the range 𝑅𝑒𝜏 ≈ 2000 − 13500. The permeability
194
+ Reynolds number (𝑅𝑒𝐾 = 𝑈𝜏
195
+
196
+ 𝐾/𝜈) was in the range 𝑅𝑒𝐾 ≈ 1 − 50. It is important to
197
+ Focus on Fluids articles must not exceed this page length
198
+
199
+ 5
200
+ note that the magnitude of 𝑈𝜏 used in Efstathiou & Luhar’s (2018) study was obtained from
201
+ the smooth-wall region upstream of the porous substrate and does not include information
202
+ about the effect of substrate permeability on the flow. In contrast, in the present study drag-
203
+ balance measurements (see Ferreira et al. 2018, for details) are performed. The drag balance
204
+ provides a direct measure of the local skin friction velocity, which will be applied as a
205
+ reference velocity for normalisation in inner units.
206
+ The paper is structured as follows: Details on porous materials, the test setup, experimental
207
+ methods, and the associated measurement uncertainty can be found in section 3. Section 4
208
+ reports the experimental findings in such a way that each of its three subsections aims to
209
+ investigate the three objectives of the current manuscript. In order to evaluate as to whether
210
+ the established scaling and similarity laws for (impermeable) rough wall flows can also be
211
+ applied for permeable wall flow, the velocity statistics scaled with outer-layer variable are
212
+ shown in section 4.1. Section 4.2 seeks to investigate the structure of turbulent flows over
213
+ and past a porous wall, which is the second objective of this paper. Section 4.3 quantifies the
214
+ wall-parallel turbulent kinetic energy spectra to elucidate the difference between shallow and
215
+ deep flows past a porous foams. Section 5 provides an extended discussion on the findings.
216
+ Finally, conclusions and perspectives are drawn in section 6.
217
+ 3. Experimental Set-up and Instrumentation:
218
+ 3.1. Porous substrate
219
+ Three foams with varying number of cells per inch, each having two thicknesses, were
220
+ used in the present study. One of these substrates was a high porosity open-cell reticulated
221
+ polyurethane foam with porosity (empty volume over total volume) 𝜖 ≈ 0.97. The other
222
+ two substrates were open-cell foams with moderate porosities 𝜖 ≈ 0.86 and 𝜖 ≈ 0.60.
223
+ The pore size of the substrates were also obtained, and these are 𝑠 ≈ 3.84, 0.89, 0.25 mm
224
+ ordered from the most porous to the least porous substrate. To measure these material
225
+ properties all substrates were scanned (CT-scan) with a voxel resolution of 0.056 mm in
226
+ all three dimensions. The data was later imported into the open source FijiJ software and
227
+ the commercial Avizo software to estimate total porosity and pore size respectively. Total
228
+ porosity was obtained by applying a Ozul threshold to the 3D stack of reconstructed images
229
+ and pore sizes were obtained by applying iterative threshold and image segmentation. To
230
+ put the total porosity values measured into context, spherical glass beads in a ‘uniformly
231
+ random’ form have a porosity ranging from 𝜖 ≈ 0.64 to 𝜖 ≈ 0.36, cylindrical packings have
232
+ a porosity range 𝜖 ≈ 0.59 to 𝜖 ≈ 0.32 and cylindrical fibres 𝜖 ≈ 0.919 to 𝜖 ≈ 0.682 as
233
+ reviewed in Macdonald et al. (1979).
234
+ 3.2. Experimental test section
235
+ All experimental investigations were conducted at the University of Southampton, in an
236
+ open-circuit suction type wind tunnel. The wind tunnel has a working section of 4.5 [m]
237
+ in length, with a 0.9 [m] height, and a 0.6 [m] cross-plane length. Over the bottom wall of
238
+ the wind tunnel, the turbulent boundary-layer has a zero-pressure-gradient. The bottom wall
239
+ of the test section is covered with the porous substrate. In the present paper, the coordinate
240
+ system is defined such that the subscripts 1, 2 and 3 are used to define entities in wall-
241
+ parallel, wall-normal and spanwise directions respectively (see figure 1). Furthermore, upper
242
+ case letters are used to denote statistical mean, while lower case letters are used to denote
243
+ the standard deviation. For instance, 𝑈1 and 𝑢2 denote the mean wall-parallel velocity and
244
+ the standard deviation of wall-normal velocity respectively.
245
+
246
+ 6
247
+ x1
248
+ x3
249
+ x2
250
+ U∞
251
+ Figure 1: Coordinate-system
252
+ 3.3. Hot-wire measurements
253
+ Hot Wire Anemometry (HWA) measurements were performed with a single wire boundary-
254
+ layer probe. This single wire, made with tungsten, has a 5 [𝜇m] diameter and a sensing length
255
+ of 1 [mm]. The hot wire probe was connected to a DANTEC Streamline Pro anemometer,
256
+ which was operating in Constant Temperature Anemometry (CTA) mode, at a fixed overheat
257
+ ratio of 0.8. The signals were sampled at a rate of 20 kHz for a duration of at-least 3 minutes,
258
+ which is equivalent to ∼ 20000 boundary-layer turnover time. The hot wire measurements
259
+ allow a direct comparison of the velocity profiles measured using PIV. In the present
260
+ manuscript single wire measurements were used to quantify temporal scales, and single-
261
+ point velocity statistics.
262
+ 3.4. Particle Image Velocimetry
263
+ In order to investigate flow structures in the mean flow direction, planar particle image
264
+ velocimetry (PIV) measurements were performed. Images for the PIV measurements were
265
+ taken with Lavision’s 16 Mpix CCD camera. The images were recorded in dual frame mode.
266
+ For illumination, a dual pulse ND:YAG laser from Litron was used. A Magnum 1200 fog
267
+ machine, equipped with a Glycerol-water based solution, was used to generate tracer particles
268
+ for PIV measurements. The average size of the resulting tracer particles was approximately
269
+ 1 [𝜇𝑚]. A flat laser sheet of about 1 [mm] was generated by placing a cylindrical lens
270
+ with a negative focal length after a set of spherical doublets. All the images were processed
271
+ using Lavision’s commercial software Davis 8.2. In total about 2500 images were acquired
272
+ at a sampling rate of 0.5 Hz, which ensures that the individual velocity field is statistically
273
+ independent. The maximum free stream displacement was around 7 pixels, which implies a
274
+ random error of 1.5% in PIV measurements. The velocity vector field were computed with a
275
+ multi-grid cross-correlation scheme, which has a final window size of 24 × 24 [pixels2], and
276
+ an overlap of 50% between the windows. Finally, PIV measurements have been performed
277
+ at distance of approximately 3.0 [m] from the inlet, as shown in figure 2. Given the fact
278
+ that the PIV measurement domain extends to almost twice the boundary-layer thickness, the
279
+ streamwise averaged boundary-layer thickness is used to normalise flow quantities throughout
280
+ the rest of the manuscript.
281
+ 3.5. Skin-friction measurements
282
+ In the present work, a floating element balance presented by Ferreira et al. (2018) is used to
283
+ quantify skin-friction coefficient (Cf ). On the bottom wall at approximately 3.3 [m] from
284
+ the inlet a floating element balance (Ferreira et al. 2018) is flush mounted onto the wind
285
+ tunnel floor. The measurement uncertainty in Cf, for all the cases reported in this study, using
286
+ the floating element is about 5% (see Appendix of Gul & Ganapathisubramani 2021, for
287
+ instance). The floating element balance is flush mounted with the wind tunnel floor and the
288
+ gap surrounding the balance is taped over to prevent leaks. The porous foams are cut with
289
+
290
+ 7
291
+ Figure 2: A schematic representation Planar PIV setup.
292
+ Table 1: Uncertainty quantification for various measured quantities.
293
+ Quantity Measured
294
+ Uncertainty (95 % confidence)
295
+ Tunnel Inlet velocity
296
+ 1 % 𝑈∞
297
+ Random error mean velocity Planar PIV
298
+ ∼ 0.1 % 𝑈∞
299
+ Averaging uncertainty 𝑅𝑖 𝑗 = 0.05 PIV
300
+ 4.0%
301
+ Averaging uncertainty 𝑢2
302
+ 𝑖
303
+ 4.0% 𝑢𝑖
304
+ Averaging uncertainty on autospectra
305
+ 1.96%
306
+ Cf floating element
307
+ 5%
308
+ 0.1 [mm] precision to accommodate onto the surface of balance. Note that this precision
309
+ is within the size of a pore for all surfaces and therefore its effect on the flow should be
310
+ negligible. More information on the drag balance measurements can be found in Esteban
311
+ et al. (2022).
312
+ 3.6. Measurement uncertainty
313
+ The statistical quantities, such as mean and standard deviation, are estimated based on number
314
+ of independent samples. The number of independent samples are 2500 (number of images)
315
+ and 20000 (boundary-layer turnover time) for PIV and HWA respectively. Based on the
316
+ number of independent samples, uncertainty in the averaging of statistical quantities can be
317
+ estimated. Averaging uncertainty, for all the statistical quantities reported, are expressed with
318
+ 95% (20 : 1 odds) confidence (see Glegg & Devenport 2017, for instance).
319
+ Finally, the statistical uncertainty in estimating two-point zero time delay correlation 𝑅𝑖 𝑗
320
+ (see Benedict & Gould 1996, for instance), 𝜖𝑅𝑖 𝑗, can be estimated with 95% confidence by:
321
+
322
+ Cameras
323
+ Top view
324
+ X3
325
+ Laser
326
+ X1
327
+ Side view
328
+ Laser sheet
329
+ Laser
330
+ X2
331
+ th
332
+ IX
333
+ ~3m8
334
+ 𝜖𝑅𝑖 𝑗 =
335
+ 2
336
+
337
+ 𝑁
338
+ × (1 − 𝑅2
339
+ 𝑖 𝑗)
340
+ (3.1)
341
+ where, 𝑁 is the number of independent samples. Finally, the measurement uncertainty for
342
+ all the flow quantities have been summarised in table 1.
343
+ 4. Results
344
+ The figure 3, shows instantaneous velocity field, with iso-contours of swirling strength (Λ𝑐𝑖)
345
+ corresponding to 2−5% of the maximum value of Λ𝑐𝑖 as recommended by Zhou et al. (1999).
346
+ As the measurements were performed only over the porous substrate, 𝑥2 = 0 corresponds to
347
+ the surface of the foam. All the plots show similar contour levels indicating that the streamwise
348
+ velocity fluctuations scaled with skin-friction velocity provides a reasonable “collapse” of the
349
+ distribution. This suggests that streamwise velocity might conform to outer-layer similarity
350
+ across all locations. However, the plots also show an overall attenuation in the extent of Λ𝑐𝑖
351
+ for the 45 PPI foam suggesting some differences in the higher order statistics (and maybe in
352
+ the vertical velocity component of some of these surfaces). This will be further explored in
353
+ this section through more detailed statistical analysis.
354
+ As mentioned earlier, the overall goal is to quantify the effect of increasing wall-porosity
355
+ and relative foam thickness on the turbulent boundary-layer. Therefore, wall-porosity (for a
356
+ given substrate thickness) was systematically increased at fixed inlet velocity. Although this
357
+ ensures that the Reynolds number based on fetch (𝑅𝑒𝑥1) is the same for all the cases,
358
+ the Reynolds number based on inner scales or the Kármán number is different. This
359
+ is because for the cases tested, the permeability and roughness based Reynolds number
360
+ increase simultaneously, and the inner velocity scales with the latter. Nevertheless, HWA
361
+ measurements were performed at several flow speeds, which permits a broad coverage of
362
+ parameter space and some iso-Kármán number data is also available. The 𝑘𝑠+ reported in
363
+ the study were obtained using hot-wire measurements (see Esteban et al. 2022, for details).
364
+ Finally, several non-dimensional parameters can be defined for given flow speed and porous
365
+ substrate parameters, therefore, they are listed in table 2. As evidenced from table 2, cases
366
+ over a wide range of Reynolds number have been investigated. Large values of 𝛿99/|𝑦𝑑| for
367
+ the three porous cases reported confirms a large separation between inner and outer scales for
368
+ permeable walls (Clifton et al. 2008). For references, |𝑦𝑑| corresponds to the absolute value
369
+ of zero plane position (see Esteban et al. 2022). The lowest Reynolds number reported, in the
370
+ present paper, is higher than most of the previous investigations (compared to Efstathiou &
371
+ Luhar 2018, for instance), which permits a clear separation of scales and extending the study
372
+ to both the transitionally and fully rough regimes. Finally, to cross validate PIV and HWA
373
+ measurements, wall-normal profiles of wall-parallel mean velocity and its root mean squared
374
+ values were compared. The mean velocity, obtained from PIV and HWA measurements,
375
+ show a good agreement; therefore, to keep the manuscript succinct only a comparison of the
376
+ variance of velocity fluctuations will be shown.
377
+ 4.1. Outer-layer scaling
378
+ In order to validate Townsend’s (1980) outer-layer hypothesis, first and second order velocity
379
+ statistics are plotted in outer-layer scaling, e.g. 𝛿99. The mean wall-parallel velocity in the
380
+ defect form is shown in figure 4. The boundary-layer thickness 𝛿99 is used to scale the wall-
381
+ normal distance while the inner-velocity 𝑈𝜏 is used to scale the wall-parallel velocity 𝑈1. The
382
+ figure 4 shows good collapse beyond 𝑥2/𝛿99 = 0.3, as has been reported by earlier studies
383
+ (Breugem et al. 2006; Manes et al. 2011; Efstathiou & Luhar 2018). In the present form
384
+
385
+ 9
386
+ (a)
387
+ (b)
388
+ (c)
389
+ (d)
390
+ (e)
391
+ (f)
392
+ Figure 3: Snapshot of instantaneous of streamwise velocity fluctuations field normalised
393
+ by 𝑈𝜏. Green contours are iso-contour values for Λ𝑐𝑖. (a) 3 [mm] thick 10 PPI foam, (b)
394
+ 15 [mm] thick 10 PPI foam, (c) 3 [mm] thick 45 PPI foam, (d) 15 [mm] thick 45 PPI foam,
395
+ (e) 3 [mm] thick 90 PPI foam, (f) 15 [mm] thick 90 PPI foam.
396
+ (figure 4), the velocity deficit increases with increasing cells per inch in a porous substrate and
397
+ the thickness of the substrate, and is consistent with the observations of Breugem et al. (2006).
398
+ However, Efstathiou & Luhar (2018) had reported a slightly non-monotonic behaviour in
399
+ velocity deficit. Efstathiou & Luhar (2018) had attributed this non-monotonic behaviour
400
+
401
+ 0.6
402
+ 660
403
+ -
404
+ C2
405
+ 0.40
406
+ -10.84
407
+ 30.2
408
+ 0
409
+ 0.51.5
410
+ C1/899-2
411
+ -3
412
+ 4
413
+ 20.6
414
+ 660
415
+ 2
416
+ 0.40
417
+ 10.84
418
+ 3
419
+ 20.2
420
+ 0
421
+ 0.2
422
+ 0.40.6
423
+ 0.8
424
+ C1/899-2
425
+ -3
426
+ 4
427
+ 1.20.6
428
+ 66Q
429
+ 32
430
+ 0.400.84
431
+ 30.2
432
+ 0
433
+ 0.51
434
+ 1.5
435
+ C1/099-2
436
+ -3
437
+ 4
438
+ 20.6
439
+ 66Q
440
+ C2
441
+ 0.40
442
+ -10.84
443
+ 30.2
444
+ 0
445
+ 0.51
446
+ 1.5
447
+ C1/ 099-2
448
+ -30.6
449
+ 0.400.84
450
+ 3
451
+ 20.2
452
+ 0
453
+ 0.51
454
+ 1.5
455
+ 2
456
+ C1/ 899-2
457
+ -3
458
+ 4
459
+ 2.50.6
460
+ 660
461
+ 32
462
+ 0.40
463
+ 10.84
464
+ 30.2
465
+ 0
466
+ 0.51.5
467
+ 1
468
+ C1/099-2
469
+ -3
470
+ .4
471
+ 210
472
+ 𝑠
473
+
474
+ 𝐾
475
+ 𝑈∞
476
+ 𝛿99
477
+ 𝑈𝜏
478
+ 𝑅𝑒𝜏
479
+ 𝑅𝑒𝐾
480
+ 𝑠+
481
+ 𝛿99/|𝑦𝑑|
482
+ 𝑘+𝑠
483
+ ℎ/𝑠
484
+ (mm)
485
+ (mm) (10−9 m2) (m/s)
486
+ (cm)
487
+ (m/s)
488
+ 0.245 (90 PPI)
489
+ 3
490
+ 2.63
491
+ 10.4
492
+ 7.41
493
+ 0.494
494
+ 2349
495
+ 1.63
496
+ 7.76
497
+ 2470
498
+ 50.73 12.2
499
+ 0.245 (90 PPI)
500
+ 15
501
+ 2.63
502
+ 10.3
503
+ 9.09
504
+ 0.479
505
+ 2831
506
+ 1.60
507
+ 7.63
508
+ 313.45
509
+ 79.7
510
+ 61.2
511
+ 17.8
512
+ 10.67 0.926
513
+ 6756
514
+ 3.25
515
+ 15.51
516
+ 1333
517
+ 161.9
518
+ 0.89 (45 PPI)
519
+ 3
520
+ 36.2
521
+ 10.3
522
+ 8.44
523
+ 0.528
524
+ 2871
525
+ 6.47
526
+ 30.27
527
+ 401.9
528
+ 118.3
529
+ 3.3
530
+ 26.5
531
+ 9.45
532
+ 1.407
533
+ 8545
534
+ 17.20
535
+ 80.47
536
+ 525
537
+ 314.4
538
+ 0.89 (45 PPI)
539
+ 15
540
+ 36.2
541
+ 9.8
542
+ 9.66
543
+ 0.572
544
+ 3716
545
+ 7.32
546
+ 34.23
547
+ 112.3
548
+ 301.6 16.8
549
+ 17.8
550
+ 10.44 1.060
551
+ 7436
552
+ 13.55
553
+ 63.39
554
+ 99.4
555
+ 557.9
556
+ 3.84 (10 PPI)
557
+ 3
558
+ 245
559
+ 9.8
560
+ 9.21
561
+ 0.591
562
+ 3644
563
+ 19.58 151.93
564
+ 118
565
+ 367.7 0.78
566
+ 3.84 (10 PPI)
567
+ 15
568
+ 245
569
+ 10.3
570
+ 14.74 0.781
571
+ 7417
572
+ 24.90 193.22
573
+ 30.8
574
+ 2100
575
+ 3.9
576
+ 18.4
577
+ 14.71 1.410 13367 44.98 378.94
578
+ 29.5
579
+ 3791
580
+ Table 2: Details of the porous-wall experimental data. The friction velocity (𝑈𝜏) is
581
+ obtained from the direct measure of skin friction from the floating element drag balance.
582
+ 10-3
583
+ 10-2
584
+ 10-1
585
+ 100
586
+ 0
587
+ 5
588
+ 10
589
+ 15
590
+ 20
591
+ Figure 4: Mean wall-parallel velocity deficit normalised by inner velocity. Legends: PIV
592
+ data; 10 PPI: red circles, 45 PPI: purple squares, Red circles 10 PPI, purple squares 45
593
+ PPI, 90 PPI: blue diamonds. Filled symbols correspond to the 15 [mm] thick substrate
594
+ while hollow correspond to the 3 [mm] thick substrate.
595
+ to the transition from deep to shallow flow over porous substrate. Furthermore, they had
596
+ reported similar non-monotonic trend in higher velocity statistics.
597
+ The variance of wall-parallel velocity disturbance (𝑢12 [m2/s2]) normalized by friction
598
+ velocity (𝑈2
599
+ 𝜏), 𝑢+
600
+ 1, is shown in figure 5. A good collapse between PIV and HWA measurements
601
+ are obtained except in the near-wall region. Near wall PIV measurements are compromised by
602
+ Rapids articles must not exceed this page length
603
+
604
+ 11
605
+ modulation error (Spencer & Hollis 2005) because the window of interrogation is larger than
606
+ the near wall structures. The near wall data is also compromised due to laser light reflections,
607
+ therefore the near-wall PIV data (∼ 2 [mm]) were omitted. Nevertheless, hot-wire data shows
608
+ that the near-wall peaks are absent. In fact, for the 10 PPI 15 [mm] substrate, 𝑢+
609
+ 1 curve becomes
610
+ essentially flat in the near-wall region. The inner peak in 𝑢+
611
+ 1 for smooth-wall is attributed
612
+ to near-wall streaks (Hutchins & Marusic 2007) and splatting (Hunt & Morrison 2000).
613
+ However, they both are subdued by wall permeability (Breugem et al. 2006) and surface
614
+ roughness (Jiménez 2004) of the porous wall. For the 15 [mm] thick substrate, reduction
615
+ in wall-parallel turbulence intensity scales with an increase in wall-permeability. This trend
616
+ is consistent with the observations made by Manes et al. (2011). Furthermore, the peak in
617
+ 𝑢1+ for thin foam is considerably closer to the wall than the thick foam, which highlights
618
+ the importance of permeability based Reynolds number 𝑅𝑒𝐾 and roughness based Reynolds
619
+ number 𝑠+. For all the substrates tested over a broad range of Reynolds numbers (𝑅𝑒𝐾 and
620
+ 𝑠+), a good collapse of wall-parallel velocity fluctuations is obtained in the outer-layer region
621
+ when plotted against outer-layer variable (𝛿99).
622
+ The turbulent fluctuations for Reynolds stress and wall-normal velocity component are
623
+ shown in figure 5 (b-c). The wall-normal velocity is especially susceptible to permeability
624
+ (see Breugem et al. 2006, for instance). Slightly away from the wall 𝑥2/𝛿90 ∼ 0.1, the
625
+ 45 PPI foams shows largest differences in the wall-normal velocity disturbances possibly
626
+ signaling increased permeability effects. The 10 PPI foam shows classic flat near wall-
627
+ velocity fluctuations, as has been reported for fully-rough flows. The wall-normal component
628
+ is associated with active motions, i.e. turbulent motion that contribute to Reynolds shear
629
+ stress. The Reynolds stress, which is comprised of both active and inactive motions, also
630
+ shows a significant spread in the outer layer for the 45 PPI foam. Therefore, impact of relative
631
+ foam thickness (ℎ/𝑠) on velocity statistics is quiet substantial for this case. It is important to
632
+ note that the spread in 𝑢1𝑢+
633
+ 2 profiles in the present study is similar to spread in wall-normal
634
+ velocity variance reported by Manes et al. (2011). Therefore, the existence of outer-layer
635
+ similarity for wall-normal velocity profiles is questionable even though the present study has
636
+ been performed at very high Reynolds number. The 90 PPI foam has a very low permeability
637
+ based Reynolds number 𝑅𝑒𝐾 ∼ 1 and a large separation between zero plane position 𝑦𝑑
638
+ and boundary-layer thickness. Nevertheless, the absence of inner-peak should be noted,
639
+ consequently it cannot be compared with smooth wall as reported by Esteban et al. (2022),
640
+ who did an extensive study based on mean velocity profiles.
641
+ Although Reynolds stress tensor component (−𝑢𝑖𝑢 𝑗) are statistical indicator of momentum
642
+ transfer in the form of Reynolds shear stress, a more efficient dichotomy of outward-
643
+ inward transport of momentum by turbulence can be obtained through quadrant analysis
644
+ (Wallace 2016). Since the Reynolds stress tensor’s component −𝑢1𝑢2 is less than zero for
645
+ well developed turbulent boundary-layer past a wall, only the ratio of negative quadrants Q2
646
+ and Q4 is shown in figure 6. Notice that the outer-layer variables are now non-dimensionalised
647
+ with 𝛿90 because PIV measurements for 10 PPI 15 [mm] substrate is unable to fully capture
648
+ the boundary layer thickness 𝛿99. Nevertheless, it was verified that normalizing the plots
649
+ with 𝛿90 or 𝛿99 had no impact on the outer-layer scaling. Therefore, subsequent plots will be
650
+ normalised by 𝛿90. The quadrant Q2 is a summation of all the instants at which the wall-
651
+ normal velocity is greater than its mean, while the wall-parallel velocity is lower than its
652
+ time average. In contrast, quadrant Q4 is a summation of all the instants when 𝑢′
653
+ 1 is positive,
654
+ while 𝑢′
655
+ 2 is negative. Q2, referred as ejections, marks the instances when a low speed fluid
656
+ parcel is transported away from the wall. In contrast Q4, referred as sweep, is transport of
657
+ high speed fluid parcel towards the wall. Figure 6 shows the relative contributions of 𝑄+
658
+ 2 and
659
+ 𝑄+
660
+ 4 quadrants as function of wall-normal distance. As a note of caution to the reader, higher
661
+
662
+ 12
663
+ 0.01
664
+ 0.1
665
+ 0.5
666
+ 1
667
+ 0
668
+ 1
669
+ 2
670
+ 3
671
+ 4
672
+ (a)
673
+ 0.1
674
+ 0.5
675
+ 1
676
+ 0
677
+ 0.2
678
+ 0.4
679
+ 0.6
680
+ 0.8
681
+ 1
682
+ 1.2
683
+ 1.4
684
+ (b)
685
+ 0.1
686
+ 0.5
687
+ 1
688
+ 0
689
+ 0.2
690
+ 0.4
691
+ 0.6
692
+ 0.8
693
+ 1
694
+ (c)
695
+ Figure 5: Outer-layer scaling of Reynolds shear stress profiles in the wall-normal direction.
696
+ Velocity fluctuations are normalised by the inner velocity (𝑢𝜏2). 𝑥2/𝛿99 = 0 corresponds
697
+ to the flow-substrate interface. Legends: PIV data; 10 PPI: red circles, 45 PPI: purple
698
+ squares, Red circles 10 PPI, purple squares 45 PPI, 90 PPI: blue diamonds. Open symbols
699
+ are for 3 [mm] thick substrate, while filled symbols correspond to 15 [mm] substrate.
700
+ HWA data; 10 PPI:red lines, 45 PPI:purple lines, 90 PPI:blue lines. Solid lines correspond
701
+ to 15 [mm] thick substrate, while the dotted lines correspond to 3 [mm] thick substrate.
702
+ values of 𝑄+
703
+ 2 or 𝑄+
704
+ 4 does not imply higher overall levels of Reynolds stress −𝑢1𝑢2 as it is
705
+ normalised by the later.
706
+ While for the 3 [mm] substrates (6 (a and a)) a good collapse is achieved irrespective
707
+ of foam permeability, for the 15 [mm] thick porous substrate weaker collapse among the
708
+ various foams can be seen. These differences exist well into the outer layer for the case of 45
709
+ PPI foam, which shows an increased 𝑄+
710
+ 2 and 𝑄+
711
+ 4 events. It is known that wall-permeability in
712
+ absence of surface roughness, opens the path between near and outer wall regions (Breugem
713
+ et al. 2006) and can invalidate the Townsend’s hypothesis. Similarly, Carpio et al. (2019)
714
+ have reported an increase in Q2 and Q4 events with an increase in permeability. However,
715
+ both these studies were performed at a low to moderate Reynolds numbers. While in our
716
+ case, where both surface roughness and permeability are present, we see that increase in
717
+ 𝑄+
718
+ 2 and 𝑄+
719
+ 4 events are only seen by foam with intermediate permeability, where the flow
720
+ remains transitionally rough, for which 𝑅𝑒𝜏 < 5000 (Esteban et al. 2022). This suggests
721
+ that with an increase in roughness Reynolds number (𝑠+) and a accompanied transition to
722
+
723
+ 13
724
+ 0.2
725
+ 0.4
726
+ 0.6
727
+ 0.8
728
+ 1
729
+ 0
730
+ 20
731
+ 40
732
+ 60
733
+ 80
734
+ 100
735
+ 120
736
+ (a)
737
+ 0.2
738
+ 0.4
739
+ 0.6
740
+ 0.8
741
+ 1
742
+ 0
743
+ 20
744
+ 40
745
+ 60
746
+ 80
747
+ 100
748
+ 120
749
+ (b)
750
+ 0.2
751
+ 0.4
752
+ 0.6
753
+ 0.8
754
+ 1
755
+ 0
756
+ 20
757
+ 40
758
+ 60
759
+ 80
760
+ 100
761
+ 120
762
+ (c)
763
+ 0.2
764
+ 0.4
765
+ 0.6
766
+ 0.8
767
+ 1
768
+ 0
769
+ 20
770
+ 40
771
+ 60
772
+ 80
773
+ 100
774
+ 120
775
+ (d)
776
+ Figure 6: (a) Relative contribution from 𝑄2/𝑄4 events for 3 [mm] thick substrate.
777
+ (b) Relative contribution from 𝑄2/𝑄4 events for 15 [mm] thick substrate. Legends: 10
778
+ PPI: red circles, 45 PPI: purple squares, Red circles 10 PPI, purple squares 45 PPI, 90
779
+ PPI: blue diamonds. Open symbols are for 3 [mm] thick substrate, while filled symbols
780
+ correspond to 15 [mm] substrate.
781
+ a fully rough regime, the effect of permeability is subdued. The increase in 𝑄+
782
+ 4 events can
783
+ be explained by relaxation in the wall-blocking condition by surface permeability. In order
784
+ to fulfil the continuity condition, the 𝑄+
785
+ 2 events need to rise accordingly (Krogstad et al.
786
+ 1992). More importantly, it appears that 𝑄+
787
+ 2 and 𝑄+
788
+ 4 events do scale with wall permeability
789
+ for transitionally rough flows, and that permeability opens a path of increased sweep events
790
+ close to the wall. Therefore, the effects of porous walls extent to the outer-layer regions,
791
+ this is sufficient to invalidate the Townsend’s outer-layer hypothesis. At shallow and deep
792
+ substrate limits the permeability and pore size based Reynolds number are similar, the only
793
+ noticeable difference are in the values of 𝑘+
794
+ 𝑠.
795
+ To conclude, figures 4 and 5 show wall-parallel mean and variance collapse in the outer-
796
+ layer when the velocity scales are normalised by 𝑈𝜏 and wall-normal distance by 𝛿99.
797
+ However, as the substrate thickness and porosity is increased, the collapse for wall-normal
798
+ component in the outer-layer becomes less evident. Furthermore, a good collapse in quadrants
799
+ 𝑄+
800
+ 2 and 𝑄+
801
+ 4 is observed in figure 6 for the thinner foam substrate. For thick substrates, collapse
802
+ is achieved either when the substrate has permeability based Reynolds number comparable to
803
+ viscous scales (90 PPI foam) or when the substrate is sparse and the flow transitions to fully
804
+ rough regime (10 PPI foam). These results cast doubts on the validity of Townsend’s outer-
805
+ layer hypothesis for turbulent flow past porous wall with varying thicknesses. Therefore, a
806
+ detailed investigation on flow-structures will be performed in the following section.
807
+
808
+ 14
809
+ 4.2. The structure of turbulent boundary-layer over porous walls
810
+ As mentioned in the introduction, for flow over and past porous foams no previous study
811
+ at high Reynolds (𝑅𝑒𝜏 ∼ 2000) have reported multi-point correlation analysis, instead only
812
+ single point statistics have been reported (Manes et al. 2011; Efstathiou & Luhar 2018).
813
+ Therefore, in the current manuscript, two-point velocity correlation will be used to study the
814
+ spatial structure of turbulence convecting over porous foams.
815
+ In the present work, two-point correlation is denoted by:
816
+ 𝑅𝑖 𝑗(𝑥1, 𝑥1′, 𝑥2, 𝑥2′, 𝑥3, 𝑥3′) =
817
+ 𝑢𝑖(𝑥1, 𝑥2, 𝑥3)𝑢 𝑗(𝑥1′, 𝑥2′, 𝑥3′)
818
+ 𝑢𝑖(𝑥1, 𝑥2, 𝑥3) × 𝑢 𝑗(𝑥1′, 𝑥2′, 𝑥3′)
819
+ (4.1)
820
+ where 𝑢𝑖(𝑥1, 𝑥2, 𝑥3) is the𝑖-th component of the velocity fluctuation at the fixed or reference
821
+ location while 𝑢 𝑗(𝑥1′, 𝑥2′, 𝑥3′) denotes the 𝑗-th component of the velocity fluctuations at the
822
+ moving point. The terms 𝑢𝑖(𝑥1, 𝑥2, 𝑥3) and 𝑢 𝑗(𝑥1′, 𝑥2′, 𝑥3′) are mean turbulent fluctuations
823
+ [m/s], at the fixed and moving point respectively. Equation (4.1), assumes that the flow is
824
+ inhomogeneous in all three spatial directions. In the current study, we only treat the wall-
825
+ normal location as the inhomogeneous direction.
826
+ As explained in the previous sections, near wall PIV data (∼ 2 [mm]) could not be used due
827
+ to modulation error and reflections close to the wall. Furthermore, it must be remembered
828
+ that PIV measurements truncate both large and small scales. On the one hand, the size of the
829
+ camera sensor sets the upper limit on the largest scale that can be imaged. While on the other
830
+ hand, the smallest scale that can be captured is directly proportional to the final window size
831
+ (Foucaut et al. 2004). Nevertheless, PIV measurements inherently show the spatial structure
832
+ of turbulence without invoking Taylor’s hypothesis. The two-point correlation maps, obtained
833
+ using PIV measurements, are plotted in figures 7, 8, and 9.
834
+ Figure 7 shows the two-point zero time delay correlation for the wall-parallel velocity
835
+ correlation in the wall-normal plane (𝑥1 − 𝑥2). Plots on left correspond to the 3 [mm] thick
836
+ porous substrate and on the right correspond to 15 [mm] thick substrate. The correlation
837
+ maps for near-wall fixed points (7 (b-d)) shows a poor collapse with the outer-layer variable
838
+ 𝛿90 in the outer-layer (Note that we are using 𝛿90 as the scaling variable instead of 𝛿99 as the
839
+ full-extent of the boundary layer is not captured for one of the PIV cases). It is important
840
+ to note that the entire extent of the wall-parallel velocity correlation could not be captured;
841
+ therefore, only values of correlation above 0.5 are shown. As can be seen from figure 7,
842
+ for any given point downstream of the fixed point, 𝑅11 appears to be inclined away from
843
+ the wall. The characteristic inclination of 𝑅11 is linked to the statistical mean inclination
844
+ of the hairpin structures with respect to the wall (Ganapathisubramani et al. 2005). In
845
+ particular, a slight increase in angle could result in better access to higher momentum for
846
+ hairpin structures. Sillero et al. (2014) reports the characteristic inclination of these hairpin
847
+ structures are ∼ 10◦. Surface roughness is known to increase the inclination angle of 𝑅11.
848
+ While Volino et al. (2007); Wu & Christensen (2010) have reported a slight increase (∼ 15◦)
849
+ in the inclination angle of 𝑅11 compared to smooth walls, Krogstad & Antonia (1994) report
850
+ almost a four-fold increase. In the present manuscript, average inclination were calculated
851
+ following Volino et al.’s (2007) procedure of fitting a line in a least square sense that passes
852
+ through the iso-contours of 𝑅11. The resulting angle close to the wall were found to be a
853
+ function of the pore size (see table 3). In the present case, where both 𝑘+
854
+ 𝑠 and 𝑅𝑒𝐾 increase
855
+ simultaneously, the 10 PPI has the highest inclination (∼ 20◦) compared to other surfaces.
856
+ It is important to mention that other studies (Volino et al. 2007; Wu & Christensen 2010)
857
+ had tested surfaces with varying roughness but the inclination was found to be independent
858
+ of 𝑘+
859
+ 𝑠. The inclination appears to be independent of the thickness of foam, but scales with
860
+
861
+ 15
862
+ -0.2
863
+ 0
864
+ 0.2
865
+ 0.4
866
+ 0
867
+ 0.05
868
+ 0.1
869
+ 0.15
870
+ 0.2
871
+ 0.25
872
+ (a)
873
+ -0.2
874
+ 0
875
+ 0.2
876
+ 0.4
877
+ 0
878
+ 0.05
879
+ 0.1
880
+ 0.15
881
+ 0.2
882
+ 0.25
883
+ (b)
884
+ -0.5
885
+ 0
886
+ 0.5
887
+ 0.2
888
+ 0.4
889
+ 0.6
890
+ 0.8
891
+ 1
892
+ (c)
893
+ -0.5
894
+ 0
895
+ 0.5
896
+ 0.2
897
+ 0.4
898
+ 0.6
899
+ 0.8
900
+ 1
901
+ (d)
902
+ Figure 7: Wall-parallel velocity two-point zero time delay correlation,
903
+ R11(𝑥1, 𝑥′
904
+ 1, 𝑥2, 𝑥′
905
+ 2, 𝑥3, 𝑥3). Plots on the left are for 3 [mm] thick substrate while plots on
906
+ the right are for 15 [mm] thick substrate. (a) Fixed point at (0.07 × 𝛿90); (b)Fixed point at
907
+ (0.07 × 𝛿90); (c) Fixed point at (0.6 × 𝛿90); (d) Fixed point at (0.6 × 𝛿90). Legends: Red
908
+ dotted lines for 10 PPI foam substrate, purple dashed lines 45 PPI foam substrate, and blue
909
+ solid lines 90 PPI foam substrate. The iso-contour lines are from 0.5 to 0.9 with an
910
+ increment of 0.1.
911
+ pore density. Therefore, the increased inclination could due to deeper penetration (filling up)
912
+ of flow past porous foams compared to skimming off for flow past foams with low porosity
913
+ (e.g. 90 PPI). This suggests that with decreasing pore density, a transition to sparse canopy
914
+ like behavior is obtained.
915
+ In the case of 𝑅22, one can quantify overall correlation length as the field-of-view is
916
+ large enough compared to overall extent of 𝑅22. The vertical velocity correlations, shown
917
+ in figure 8, appears to be more sensitive to wall-permeability and thickness. Firstly, 𝑅22
918
+ appears to be symmetric in the wall-parallel direction; however, a compression is observed
919
+ in the wall-normal direction. Therefore, while permeable boundary condition with finite
920
+ permeability does relax the wall blocking, it is not do enough to achieve symmetry in the
921
+ wall-normal planes. The vertical velocity correlations for the 90 PPI foam remains invariant
922
+ as the thickness of the substrate is increased. This clearly shows when 𝑅𝑒𝐾 ∼ 1, then foams
923
+ behave like a smooth wall, and permeable effects are negligible. Interestingly, for the thicker
924
+ foam substrate, as the porosity is increased, the overall extent of 𝑅22 first decreases (45 PPI)
925
+ and then increases (10 PPI), as evidenced from figure 8 (b). In contrast, Carpio et al. (2019)
926
+
927
+ 16
928
+ Foam
929
+
930
+ Angle
931
+ (PPI) (mm) (Degree)
932
+ 90
933
+ 3
934
+ 13
935
+ 15
936
+ 13.4
937
+ 45
938
+ 3
939
+ 15.8
940
+ 15
941
+ 16.2
942
+ 10
943
+ 3
944
+ 20.6
945
+ 15
946
+ 19.4
947
+ Table 3: Angle of 𝑅11 at 0.07 × 𝛿90.
948
+ had reported decrease in correlation in the extent of 𝑅22 with increasing permeability. It is
949
+ noteworthy that while the flow over 45 PPI case 15 [mm] case is transitionally rough, the
950
+ flow over 10 PPI case 15 [mm] case is fully rough (Esteban et al. 2022). Therefore, it appears
951
+ that the permeable effects, which lead to the reduction in the extent of 𝑅22 is no longer
952
+ dominant in sparse foams, where the flow transitions to a fully rough regime. Furthermore,
953
+ when the overall extent of 𝑅22 is normalized by the boundary-layer thickness, a good collapse
954
+ is obtained (8 (a-c)) for the thinner substrate. This indicates that reduction in the extent of
955
+ wall-normal velocity correlation (𝑅22) with permeability is ineffective for the 3 [mm] thick
956
+ substrate, yielding a better collapse for all the cases well into the outer layer. In contrast, for
957
+ the thicker foam, the influence of permeability is present well into the outer-layer (8 (d)),
958
+ provided permeability is greater than the viscous scales (𝑅𝑒𝐾 > 1) and the foam operates at
959
+ a dense (𝑠+ < 100) and deep (ℎ/𝑠 > 10) limits. At sparse foam limit deeper flow penetration
960
+ can be seen from figure (8 (b)), this is inline with the “filling up effect” remark made earlier
961
+ in conjunction with mean inclination of the hairpin structures with respect to the wall.
962
+ The two-point correlation of Reynolds stress component (the wall-parallel and wall-normal
963
+ velocity fluctuations), 𝑅12, in 𝑥1 − 𝑥2 plane, is plotted in figure 9. The correlation 𝑅12 is
964
+ representative of the extent to which the wall-parallel velocity are associated with a single
965
+ ejection or sweep event, induced by the wall-normal velocity fluctuations. Recently, Gul
966
+ & Ganapathisubramani (2021) showed for rough walls, 𝑅12 scales with the boundary-layer
967
+ thickness and is independent of the 𝑘+
968
+ 𝑠 or the Kármán number. For the 15 [mm] substrate, as
969
+ the porosity is increased, the 𝑅12 first decreases (45 PPI) and then increases (10 PPI). This
970
+ behaviour is similar to 𝑅22 correlation map, as shown earlier. In particular, the extent of the
971
+ correlation map 𝑅12 seems to be shortest for 45 PPI 15 [mm] thick substrate. In fact, the
972
+ maximum iso-contour levels plotted, e.g. −0.4, is visibly absent for the 45 PPI 15 [mm] thick
973
+ substrate case. Therefore, in response to the first objective of the present paper, the inability
974
+ of boundary-layer thickness to collapse the overall extent of the 𝑅22 and 𝑅12 (well into the
975
+ outer-layer) suggests that Townsend’s outer-layer similarity for these higher order quantities
976
+ may not be valid for 15 [mm] thick porous substrates.
977
+ Finally, Manes et al. (2011); Efstathiou & Luhar (2018) have linked improved mixing for
978
+ the thickest and most permeable foams to the presence of KH instability. Furthermore, Manes
979
+ et al. (2011) and Sharma & García-Mayoral (2020b) state such KH type instability occur at
980
+ the interface of porous substrate, and at a distance 𝑥2/𝛿99 < 0.1. Indeed, KH instability are
981
+ known to induce large quasi two-dimensional rollers, which leads to periodic organisation of
982
+ wall-normal flow disturbances (see figure 18 of Jaiswal et al. 2022, for instance). Although
983
+
984
+ 17
985
+ -0.1
986
+ -0.05
987
+ 0
988
+ 0.05
989
+ 0.1
990
+ 0
991
+ 0.05
992
+ 0.1
993
+ 0.15
994
+ 0.2
995
+ 0.25
996
+ (a)
997
+ -0.1
998
+ -0.05
999
+ 0
1000
+ 0.05
1001
+ 0.1
1002
+ 0
1003
+ 0.05
1004
+ 0.1
1005
+ 0.15
1006
+ 0.2
1007
+ 0.25
1008
+ (b)
1009
+ -0.4
1010
+ -0.2
1011
+ 0
1012
+ 0.2
1013
+ 0.4
1014
+ 0.2
1015
+ 0.4
1016
+ 0.6
1017
+ 0.8
1018
+ 1
1019
+ (c)
1020
+ -0.4
1021
+ -0.2
1022
+ 0
1023
+ 0.2
1024
+ 0.4
1025
+ 0.2
1026
+ 0.4
1027
+ 0.6
1028
+ 0.8
1029
+ 1
1030
+ (d)
1031
+ Figure 8: Wall-normal velocity two-point zero time delay correlation,
1032
+ R22(𝑥1, 𝑥′
1033
+ 1, 𝑥2, 𝑥′
1034
+ 2, 𝑥3, 𝑥3). Plots on the left are for 3 [mm] thick substrate while plots on
1035
+ the right are for 15 [mm] thick substrate. (a) Fixed point at (0.07 × 𝛿90); (b) Fixed point
1036
+ at (0.07 × 𝛿90); (c) Fixed point at (0.6 × 𝛿90); (d) Fixed point at (0.6 × 𝛿90). Legends:
1037
+ 10 PPI:red dotted line, 45 PPI:purple dashed, 90 PPI:blue solid. The iso-contour lines are
1038
+ from 0.2 to 0.9 with an increment of 0.1.
1039
+ the figures 8 show limited streamwise extent, no periodic structures or modes associated
1040
+ with KH instability were observed for 𝑅22 or 𝑅12 (figures 8 (d)) within the measurement
1041
+ domain. This suggests that no KH type flow instability may be present in the cases that were
1042
+ investigated.
1043
+ As mentioned earlier, only the length scales associated with wall-normal can be quantified
1044
+ due to limited bandwidth (FOV) of our PIV measurements. In the present work, the turbulence
1045
+ correlation length is defined as:
1046
+ Λ|𝑘±
1047
+ 𝑖 𝑗 (𝑥𝑖) =
1048
+ ∫ ∞
1049
+ −∞
1050
+ 𝑅𝑖 𝑗(𝑥𝑖, x𝑘±) d𝑥𝑘±
1051
+ (4.2)
1052
+ Here, x𝑘± is the separation vector in the direction 𝑘. The subscript ± denotes moving
1053
+ point direction. For instance, if the fixed point is located above the moving points for the
1054
+ wall-normal velocity calculations, then the integration of (4.2) will yield Λ|2−
1055
+ 22 (𝑥2). This
1056
+ way of defining length scale is particularly appropriate for in-homogeneous turbulence (see
1057
+ Jaiswal et al. 2020, for instance). However, as noted by Sillero et al.’s (2014), a clear
1058
+
1059
+ 18
1060
+ -0.3
1061
+ -0.2
1062
+ -0.1
1063
+ 0
1064
+ 0.1
1065
+ 0.2
1066
+ 0.3
1067
+ 0
1068
+ 0.1
1069
+ 0.2
1070
+ 0.3
1071
+ 0.4
1072
+ (a)
1073
+ -0.3
1074
+ -0.2
1075
+ -0.1
1076
+ 0
1077
+ 0.1
1078
+ 0.2
1079
+ 0.3
1080
+ 0
1081
+ 0.1
1082
+ 0.2
1083
+ 0.3
1084
+ 0.4
1085
+ (b)
1086
+ -0.6
1087
+ -0.4
1088
+ -0.2
1089
+ 0
1090
+ 0.2
1091
+ 0.4
1092
+ 0.3
1093
+ 0.4
1094
+ 0.5
1095
+ 0.6
1096
+ 0.7
1097
+ 0.8
1098
+ 0.9
1099
+ (c)
1100
+ -0.6
1101
+ -0.4
1102
+ -0.2
1103
+ 0
1104
+ 0.2
1105
+ 0.4
1106
+ 0.3
1107
+ 0.4
1108
+ 0.5
1109
+ 0.6
1110
+ 0.7
1111
+ 0.8
1112
+ 0.9
1113
+ (d)
1114
+ Figure 9: The two-point zero time delay correlation of Reynolds stress component
1115
+ R12(𝑥1, 𝑥′
1116
+ 1, 𝑥2, 𝑥′
1117
+ 2, 𝑥3, 𝑥3). Plots on the left are for 3 [mm] thick substrate while plots on
1118
+ the right are for 15 [mm] thick substrate. (a) Fixed point at (0.07 × 𝛿90); (b) Fixed point
1119
+ at (0.07 × 𝛿90); (c) Fixed point at (0.6 × 𝛿90); (d) Fixed point at (0.6 × 𝛿90). Legends:
1120
+ 10 PPI:red dotted line, 45 PPI:purple dashed, 90 PPI:blue solid. The three iso-contours
1121
+ levels correspond to the values of −0.4, −0.35 −0.30.
1122
+ physical interpretation of the length scale is difficult. The present study seeks to compare
1123
+ the effects of porous surfaces on the large scale turbulence structures, therefore a contextual
1124
+ interpretation of the length-scale can be used where it is a metric to quantify overall spatial
1125
+ correlation of velocity disturbances. 𝑅𝑖 𝑗 being a statistical quantity, equation (4.2) cannot
1126
+ be used directly without accumulating averaging 𝜖𝑅𝑖 𝑗 errors (see equation (3.1)). In order
1127
+ to avoid the accumulation of errors, length scales were estimated by fitting an exponential
1128
+ decay function (see Jaiswal et al. 2020, for implementation details).
1129
+ Figure 10 shows the longitudinal correlation length scales for wall-normal velocity
1130
+ component. Figure 10 (a-b), shows the wall-normal correlation lengths, Λ|2−
1131
+ 22 (𝑥2) and
1132
+ Λ|2+
1133
+ 22 (𝑥2), in the 𝑥1-𝑥2 plane. The length scale Λ|2−
1134
+ 22 (𝑥2) should be particularly sensitive to the
1135
+ blocking effects induced by the wall. This is not surprising because the blocking effects are
1136
+ pre-dominant when approaching the wall (see Jaiswal et al. 2020, for instance). Nevertheless,
1137
+ difference in length scale for thicker 15 [mm] porous substrate is more visible. For instance,
1138
+ correlation length scales (Λ|2−
1139
+ 22 (𝑥2)) for the 45 PPI substrate is smaller throughout the
1140
+ boundary layer. Surprisingly, the length scale Λ|2+
1141
+ 22 (𝑥2) shows even more substantial reduction
1142
+
1143
+ 19
1144
+ 0.1
1145
+ 0.5
1146
+ 1
1147
+ 0
1148
+ 0.05
1149
+ 0.1
1150
+ 0.15
1151
+ 0.2
1152
+ 0.25
1153
+ (a)
1154
+ 0.1
1155
+ 0.5
1156
+ 1
1157
+ 0
1158
+ 0.05
1159
+ 0.1
1160
+ 0.15
1161
+ 0.2
1162
+ 0.25
1163
+ 0.3
1164
+ (b)
1165
+ Figure 10: Longitudinal length scales of wall-normal velocity component. (a) Integral
1166
+ length scale Λ|2+
1167
+ 22 (𝑥2) (b) Integral length scale Λ|2−
1168
+ 22 (𝑥2) Legends: Red circles 10 PPI,
1169
+ purple squares 45 PPI, and blue diamonds 90 PPI. Open symbols are for 3 [mm] thick
1170
+ substrate, while filled symbols correspond to 15 [mm] substrate.
1171
+ for the 45 PPI and 15 [mm] thick foam. Therefore, in response to the second objective of the
1172
+ present paper, no KH type flow instabilities were observed while substantial differences in
1173
+ length scales (Λ|2+
1174
+ 22 (𝑥2)) are observed in the boundary-layer above the porous foam at a thick
1175
+ substrate limit (ℎ/𝑠 > 10).
1176
+ As mentioned previously, the length scale associated with wall-parallel velocity disturbance
1177
+ could not be quantified due to limited field of view. However, thanks to single-wire
1178
+ measurements, a high-fidelity estimation of time-scales associated with wall-parallel velocity
1179
+ fluctuations is possible. Similar to length scale, the time scale can be defined as:
1180
+ 𝑇(xi) =
1181
+ ∫ ∞
1182
+ −∞
1183
+ 𝑅11
1184
+ �xi(𝑡), xi(𝑡 + d𝑡)�d𝑡
1185
+ (4.3)
1186
+ In order to reduce error in the estimation of𝑇(xi), the temporal correlations were fitted with
1187
+ an exponential decay function exp(−𝑎𝑥𝑘) to reduce the accumulation of errors in estimating
1188
+ 𝑇(xi).
1189
+ The time scales thus calculated are plotted in figure 11. The time scales have been
1190
+ normalised with outer-layer variables 𝑈∞ and 𝛿90, as such the plots show time scale per
1191
+ unit boundary-layer turnover time. The figures 11 (a-b) show that the time-scales appear to
1192
+ collapse for the 3 [mm] substrate irrespective of the pore density (PPI). For the 15 [mm]
1193
+ substrate, the most porous foam (10 PPI) compares poorly in the near-wall region. More
1194
+ specifically, the 10 PPI 15 [mm] substrate has the shortest eddy turnover time. Since, the
1195
+ measurements were performed at different 𝑅𝑒𝜏, therefore, two additional cases at similar
1196
+ 𝑅𝑒𝜏 and thickness are plotted in figures 11 (b). As can be seen from figure 11 (b), the 10 PPI
1197
+ 15 [mm] substrate remains an outlier, as it has the shortest eddy turnover time. Nevertheless,
1198
+ at these Reynolds number 𝑅𝑒𝜏 ∼ 7000 the flow becomes fully rough (Esteban et al. 2022).
1199
+ Therefore, it is hypothesised that large energetic structures are pushed away from the wall, as
1200
+ fully rough regime develops. This is consistent with previous findings made by Squire et al.
1201
+ (2016) for flow past impermeable rough walls. This also explains a slight reduction in eddy
1202
+ turnover time for 45 and 90 PPI foams at 𝑅𝑒𝜏 ∼ 7000.
1203
+ The hot-wire data for all the cases can be further explored to examine the spectral content
1204
+
1205
+ 20
1206
+ 0.2
1207
+ 0.4
1208
+ 0.6
1209
+ 0.8
1210
+ 1
1211
+ 0.6
1212
+ 0.8
1213
+ 1
1214
+ 1.2
1215
+ 1.4
1216
+ 1.6
1217
+ 1.8
1218
+ (a)
1219
+ 0.2
1220
+ 0.4
1221
+ 0.6
1222
+ 0.8
1223
+ 1
1224
+ 0
1225
+ 0.5
1226
+ 1
1227
+ 1.5
1228
+ 2
1229
+ (b)
1230
+ Figure 11: Integral scales of turbulence. (a) Integral time scale T for 3 [mm] thick
1231
+ substrates (b) Integral time scale T for 15 [mm] thick substrates. Legends: Red circles 10
1232
+ PPI, purple squares 45 PPI, and blue diamonds 90 PPI. Blue dashed and purple dotted
1233
+ lines correspond to 90 PPI and 45 PPI foams respectively, at similar 𝑅𝑒𝜏 ∼ 7000 and 15
1234
+ [mm] thick foam substrate.
1235
+ of the turbulent structures and the similarity (or lack thereof) between the different substrates
1236
+ can further elucidated.
1237
+ 4.3. Spectral analysis of deep and shallow flows over porous foam.
1238
+ In order to obtain frequency related information of the turbulent kinetic energy associated
1239
+ with wall-parallel velocity disturbances, pre-multiplied wall parallel turbulent energy spectra
1240
+ (𝐸11) were computed and are depicted in this section at various wall-normal positions across
1241
+ the different porous substrates.
1242
+ Figure 12 shows contours pre-multiplied energy spectrogram (with normalised wall-
1243
+ normal position - 𝑥2/𝛿90- in the 𝑥-axis and normalised frequency - 𝐹+ = 𝐹𝜈/𝑈2
1244
+ 𝜏 - in
1245
+ the 𝑥2-axis). Each sub-figure also shows an inset where the 𝑥2-axis is scaled in outer units
1246
+ (𝐹𝛿90/𝑈∞). Various cases have been ordered based on the thickness to pore ratio (ℎ/𝑠) at
1247
+ same fetch-based Reynolds number (𝑅𝑒𝑥1). The figures on the left column are for 3[mm]
1248
+ thick substrate while figures on the right correspond to 15[mm] thick substrate. The rows are
1249
+ arranged so that top row corresponds to porous substrates with highest permeability, while
1250
+ the lowest permeability substrates are at the bottom row. For the 3[mm] 90 PPI case, the
1251
+ peak is observed slightly away from the wall (figure 12 (e)). For the same substrate thickness,
1252
+ as permeability increases at first the peak moves closer to the wall (45 PPI case). However,
1253
+ with a further increase in permeability (10 PPI case) the peak in 𝐸11 (see figure 12 (a)) is
1254
+ smeared, and an energetic region slightly away from the wall is observed.
1255
+ For the case of 45 PPI substrate (figures 12c and 12d), the spectral peak is always located
1256
+ very close to the interface. A peak is possible even closer to the wall for 45 and 90 PPI,
1257
+ however it is unclear if this might extend in to the porous substrate. As the permeability and
1258
+ sparsity increases (from 90 PPI to 45 PPI), the substrate tends ot break-up near-wall structures
1259
+ and the energy is distributed across different scales. This results in the wall-normal shift of
1260
+ 𝐸11 peak. Figures 12 (c-f) and (a-d) show energy spectra for cases at similar 𝑅𝑒𝜏. Figures 12
1261
+ (c-f) are at transitionally rough regime. Therefore, for transitionally rough regime (figures
1262
+ 12 (c-f)) the spectral peak seems to be a function of ℎ/𝑠, as argued by (Efstathiou & Luhar
1263
+ 2018). The preceding argument is valid only for 45 and 90 PPI at lowest flow speeds at which
1264
+ both are transitionally rough, and for which foam remains dense or 𝑠+ is small.
1265
+
1266
+ 21
1267
+ (a)
1268
+ (b)
1269
+ (c)
1270
+ (d)
1271
+ (e)
1272
+ (f)
1273
+ Figure 12: Premultiplied 1-D Wall-parallel velocity energy spectra 𝐸11
1274
+
1275
+ F×E11
1276
+ 𝑈2𝜏
1277
+
1278
+ as a
1279
+ function of frequency F+
1280
+
1281
+ F×𝜈
1282
+ 𝑈2𝜏
1283
+
1284
+ , over the surface of foam, measured at a distance of 𝑥1
1285
+ = 3.3 [m] downstream of inlet. (a) 3 [mm] thick 10 PPI foam, (b) 15 [mm] thick 10 PPI
1286
+ foam, (c) 3 [mm] thick 45 PPI foam, (d) 15 [mm] thick 45 PPI foam, (e) 3 [mm] thick 90
1287
+ PPI foam, (f) 15 [mm] thick 90 PPI foam.
1288
+
1289
+ 2
1290
+ 10-1
1291
+ 1.5
1292
+ 10-2
1293
+ 1
1294
+ 0.5
1295
+ 10~3
1296
+ 0
1297
+ 10-2
1298
+ 100
1299
+ C2/89010-1
1300
+ 2
1301
+ 1100
1302
+ 1.5
1303
+ 10-2
1304
+ 10
1305
+ 1
1306
+ 10-3
1307
+ 0.5
1308
+ 10-2
1309
+ 100
1310
+ C2/8902
1311
+ 100
1312
+ 10-1
1313
+ 1.5
1314
+ 10-2
1315
+ 1
1316
+ 0.5
1317
+ 10-3
1318
+ n
1319
+ 10-2
1320
+ 100
1321
+ C2/8902
1322
+ 10-1
1323
+ F
1324
+ 1.5
1325
+ 10
1326
+ 10-2
1327
+ 1
1328
+ 0.5
1329
+ 10-3
1330
+ 10-2
1331
+ 100
1332
+ C2/8902
1333
+ 03100
1334
+ 10-1
1335
+ 1.5
1336
+ 左 10-2
1337
+ 1
1338
+ 0.5
1339
+ 10-3
1340
+ 10-2
1341
+ 100
1342
+ C2/0902
1343
+ 100
1344
+ 10-1
1345
+ 1.5
1346
+ 10
1347
+ 10-2
1348
+ 1
1349
+ 0.5
1350
+ 10-3
1351
+ 0
1352
+ 10-2
1353
+ 100
1354
+ C2/89022
1355
+ (a)
1356
+ (b)
1357
+ (c)
1358
+ Figure 13: Premultiplied 1-D Wall-parallel velocity energy spectra 𝐸11
1359
+
1360
+ F×E11
1361
+ 𝑈2𝜏
1362
+
1363
+ as a
1364
+ function of frequency F+
1365
+
1366
+ F×𝜈
1367
+ 𝑈2𝜏
1368
+
1369
+ at similar 𝑅𝑒𝜏 ∼ 7000 and foam thickness 15 [mm].
1370
+ (a) 90 PPI foam. (b) 45 PPI foam. (c) 10 PPI foam.
1371
+ Finally, as shown in figures 12 (a) and (b) the peak in specral energy is closer 𝑥2/𝛿90 ∼ 0.1
1372
+ from the interface for the 10 PPI case. This “outer-peak” is typically associated with large-
1373
+ and very-large-scale motions (for flows over impermeable walls - both smooth and rough).
1374
+ This suggests that for for 10 PPI case, this outer region seems to be well developed for both
1375
+ thicknesses. This is concurrent with reduction of near-wall energy due to the “roughness”
1376
+ redistributing the energy across different scales and leading to eddies with shorter time scales
1377
+ close to the wall, as reported in figure 11 (b). Similar findings were made in previous studies
1378
+ over impermeable rough wall (see Schultz & Flack 2007; Squire et al. 2016, for instance),
1379
+ and presence of plateau in the turbulence intensity plots shown in figure 5. Therefore, with
1380
+ increasing values of 𝑠+ (hence 𝑘+
1381
+ 𝑠), a reduction in near-wall energy is observed (compare plots
1382
+ 12 b and e), and that in fully-rough regimes the peak in 𝐸11 is not a function of permeability
1383
+ based Reynolds number 𝑅𝑒𝐾. It may be argued that absence of near-wall peak in 𝐸11 can be
1384
+ a precursor or a result of fully-rough flow regime, which depends only on pressure drag. For
1385
+ flows above such sparse (𝑠+ ∼ 100) porous foam, roughness effects become dominant.
1386
+ To reinforce aforementioned claim that in the fully-rough regime the peak in spectra is no
1387
+
1388
+ 10-1
1389
+ 2
1390
+ 1100
1391
+ 1.5
1392
+ 10-2
1393
+ 10
1394
+ 1
1395
+ 10-3
1396
+ 0.5
1397
+ 10-2
1398
+ 100
1399
+ C2/8902
1400
+ 10-1
1401
+ 1.5
1402
+ 10
1403
+ 10-2
1404
+
1405
+ 1
1406
+ 10~3
1407
+ 0.5
1408
+ 10-2
1409
+ 100
1410
+ C2/0902
1411
+ 100
1412
+ 10-1
1413
+ F
1414
+ 1.5
1415
+ 10-2
1416
+ 1
1417
+ 10~3
1418
+ 0.5
1419
+ 0
1420
+ 10-2
1421
+ 100
1422
+ C2/89023
1423
+ 0.01
1424
+ 0.1
1425
+ 0.2
1426
+ 0.5
1427
+ 1
1428
+ 0.5
1429
+ 0.55
1430
+ 0.6
1431
+ 0.65
1432
+ 0.7
1433
+ 0.75
1434
+ (a)
1435
+ 0.01
1436
+ 0.1
1437
+ 0.2
1438
+ 0.5
1439
+ 1
1440
+ 0.5
1441
+ 0.55
1442
+ 0.6
1443
+ 0.65
1444
+ 0.7
1445
+ 0.75
1446
+ (b)
1447
+ Figure 14: Shannon Entropy evaluated from streamwise velocity spectra. (a) 3 [mm] thick
1448
+ substrate Legends: Red circles 10 PPI 𝑅𝑒𝜏 = 3644,𝑅𝑒𝐾 = 19.5; Purple squares 45 PPI
1449
+ 𝑅𝑒𝜏 = 2871,𝑅𝑒𝐾 = 6.47; Blue diamonds 90 PPI 𝑅𝑒𝜏 = 2349,𝑅𝑒𝐾 = 1.63; and Gray
1450
+ pentagon 45 PPI 𝑅𝑒𝜏 = 8545,𝑅𝑒𝐾 = 17.2.(b) 15 [mm] thick substrate Legends: Red
1451
+ circles 10 PPI 𝑅𝑒𝜏 = 7417,𝑅𝑒𝐾 = 24.9; Purple squares 45 PPI 𝑅𝑒𝜏 = 3716,𝑅𝑒𝐾 = 7.32;
1452
+ Blue diamonds 90 PPI 𝑅𝑒𝜏 = 2831,𝑅𝑒𝐾 = 1.6; Red dotted line 10 PPI
1453
+ 𝑅𝑒𝜏 = 13367,𝑅𝑒𝐾 = 45; Purple dashed line 45 PPI 𝑅𝑒𝜏 = 7436,𝑅𝑒𝐾 = 13.55 and Blue
1454
+ solid line 90 PPI 𝑅𝑒𝜏 = 6756,𝑅𝑒𝐾 = 3.25.
1455
+ longer a function of ℎ/𝑠, figure 13 shows streamwise velocity spectra for the cases for where
1456
+ the flow is fully-rough (at 𝑅𝑒𝜏 ∼ 7000). As shown in figure 13, the peak in kinetic energy
1457
+ spectra associated to streamwise velocity appear to be centred 𝑥2/𝛿90 ∼ 0.1 confirming that
1458
+ for fully-rough regime position of peak in kinetic energy spectra no longer scales with ℎ/𝑠,
1459
+ as flow becomes increasingly sparse at higher Reynolds numbers (𝑠+). As a result, for fully
1460
+ rough flows over porous foams, the dependency of kinetic energy spectra peak on pore size
1461
+ saturates, and the near-wall region is dominated by the roughness sub layer while the effect
1462
+ of permeability is restricted.
1463
+ A quantitative comparison of the energy distribution across different cases can be obtained
1464
+ by computing the Shannon entropy of the spectral content of the streamwise velocity. Wesson
1465
+ et al. (2003) define Shannon entropy of the spectral content as:
1466
+ SH =
1467
+ N
1468
+ ∑︁
1469
+ i
1470
+ −Si log Si
1471
+ log N
1472
+ (4.4)
1473
+ The Shannon entropy has also been used in the past by Manes et al. (2011); therefore
1474
+ a direct comparison with other studies if possible especially comparing surfaces with or
1475
+ without surface roughness over a permeable surface.
1476
+ As mentioned by Manes et al. (2011), Shannon entropy is a measure of scale heterogeneity
1477
+ and spectral shrinkage. In presence of coherent structures, the energy is concentrated
1478
+ around fewer scales that results in shrinkage of spectra, around the frequency (and hence
1479
+ wavenumber) of the corresponding coherent structure. As shown in figure 14, normalised
1480
+ Shannon entropy increases with a decrease in permeability. Furthermore, Shannon entropy is
1481
+ not a function of ℎ/𝑠, which is inline with the observations made from figures 12 and 13. For
1482
+ thinner 3 [mm] substrate, a good agreement is found beyond 0.1 × 𝛿90. Manes et al. (2011)
1483
+ had argued that the Shannon’s entropy should scale with permeability (𝑅𝑒𝐾). Manes et al.
1484
+ (2011) had associated this with the mixing-layer analogy. If 𝑅𝑒𝐾 determines the permeability
1485
+
1486
+ 24
1487
+ and the shear penetration depth is captured by the ratio 𝛿99/𝑦𝑑, then the 10 PPI, 15 [mm]
1488
+ thick substrate at 𝑅𝑒𝐾 ∼ 45 should have shown the lowest values of Shannon entropy (Figure
1489
+ 14 dotted red line). Instead the same 10 PPI substrate at 𝑅𝑒𝐾 = 25) has lower values of
1490
+ Shannon entropy compared to 10 PPI substrate at 𝑅𝑒𝐾 = 45. Moreover, as shown in figure
1491
+ 14, the Shannon entropy seems to be invariant to a single classical porous material parameters
1492
+ reported in the study. This is further reinforced by the fact that the 15 [mm] 45 PPI case at
1493
+ 𝑅𝑒𝐾 of 19.5 and 𝑠+ of 91.2 shows much lower SH compared to 3 [mm] thick 10 PPI porous
1494
+ substrate at same 𝑅𝑒𝐾 but much higher 𝑠+.
1495
+ For similar 𝑅𝑒𝐾 ∼ 19, the Shannon entropy for the case of 45 PPI foam is vastly greater
1496
+ than the 10 PPI, for the 3 [mm] thick substrate. Therefore, wall-permeability alone does
1497
+ determine existence of large coherent structures in the case of porous foams with a finite
1498
+ thickness. For instance, at the deep foam limit the present 𝑅𝑒𝐾 determines scale heterogeneity
1499
+ only when 𝑅𝑒𝜏 is similar. The independence of SH from wall-permeability (𝑅𝑒𝐾) can be
1500
+ due to increase in sparsity (𝑠+) with increasing Reynolds number (𝑅𝑒𝜏), which may limit
1501
+ permeability effects of porous substrate.
1502
+ 5. Discussion
1503
+ In the present study, relative foam thickness, pore density and size were varied to assess
1504
+ their impact on turbulent boundary layer above a foam. For thick foam substrates, a deep
1505
+ foam limit is achieved for foams with higher pore density (45 PPI and 90 PPI). Such
1506
+ deep foams remain at dense foam limit at low Reynolds number based on average pore
1507
+ size (𝑠+ < 50), and differences in outer-layer similarity are observed, provided that the
1508
+ permeability based Reynolds number is high enough (𝑅𝑒𝐾 > 1). In particular, velocity
1509
+ disturbances are substantially attenuated, and the extent of wall-normal velocity correlation,
1510
+ 𝑅22, diminishes significantly. Therefore, 15 [mm] thick 45 PPI substrate has the lowest values
1511
+ of Λ|2+
1512
+ 22 (𝑥2). The 15 [mm] thick 45 PPI foam also has the smallest extent of streamwise
1513
+ velocity streaks at a given ejection or sweep event (𝑅12) compared to the rest of the cases.
1514
+ More importantly, these differences persists well into the outer-layer. The 45 PPI foam has
1515
+ similar values of 𝑅𝑒𝐾 and 𝑠+ in deep and shallow substrate limits, and the only noticeable
1516
+ difference are measured in the values of 𝑘+
1517
+ 𝑠. In other words, at thin substrate limit, the
1518
+ effect of solid wall below the foam substrate is non-negligible, as it attenuates the the zero
1519
+ displacement plane and hence the equivalent sand grain roughness. Therefore, for porous
1520
+ foams “thickness induced surface-roughness, 𝑘𝑠𝑟” (see Esteban et al. 2022, for details) can
1521
+ influence the outer-layer statistics. This is achieved by means of higher 𝑄+
1522
+ 2 and 𝑄+
1523
+ 4 events
1524
+ measured throughout the boundary layer, as such inner-layer is able to communicate with
1525
+ outer layer. Similar observations were made by Krogstad et al. (1992) for flows over and past
1526
+ impermeable rough wall. While it is tempting to draw an analogy between dense-deep foams
1527
+ and that of flow past dense canopy (Sharma & García-Mayoral 2020b), in present study no
1528
+ evidence of KH type flow instability is found for similar levels of sparsity and deep thickness
1529
+ limit. Nevertheless, it is hypothesized that the foam density limits required for the inception
1530
+ of KH instability could be lower in the case of porous substrate compared to the flow past
1531
+ dense canopy. This is backed by the findings of Manes et al. (2011); Efstathiou & Luhar
1532
+ (2018), who found the peak in wall-parallel velocity spectra associated with KH instability
1533
+ at lower Reynolds number (𝑠+) compared to the present study.
1534
+ As the wall-porosity is further increased for the same substrate thickness, the pore size
1535
+ becomes same order of magnitude as the substrate thickness (ℎ/𝑠 < 10) enabling access
1536
+ to shallow and sparse foam limits. At the sparse limit, it is hypothesized that as viscous
1537
+ scales shrink with increasing Reynolds number the reduction in velocity disturbances by
1538
+ porosity saturates. This is because the pore size becomes substantially larger than the near-
1539
+
1540
+ 25
1541
+ wall viscous scales and as such attenuation in wall-normal velocity correlation is no longer
1542
+ possible. This is also evidenced from the spectral heterogeneity, which no longer scales
1543
+ with wall-permeability (𝑅𝑒𝐾) at high sparsity limit (𝑠+ ∼ 100). Therefore, flow at high 𝑠+
1544
+ becomes analogous to flow past sparse canopies (Bailey & Stoll 2013; Sharma & García-
1545
+ Mayoral 2020a). The increase in velocity disturbances is also similar to ones observed in high
1546
+ sparsity limits for canopies (Sharma & García-Mayoral 2020a). This limits the attenuation of
1547
+ wall-normal velocity disturbances that drive wall-pressure fluctuations (Carpio et al. 2019).
1548
+ Similar to an impermeable rough wall, roughness sub-layer pushes the energetic flow away
1549
+ from the surface in the case of porous walls, as evidenced from streamwise kinetic energy
1550
+ spectra. Therefore, the wall-normal location of the velocity energy spectra peak depends
1551
+ on foam density (𝑠+) and flow regime, and spectral peak becomes independent of foam
1552
+ thickness (ℎ/𝑠) at sparse substrate limit. At the dense limit, the wall-normal location of the
1553
+ wall-parallel energy spectra scales with foam thickness (ℎ/𝑠), as observed by Efstathiou
1554
+ & Luhar (2018). An important distinction between flow past sparse porous substrates and
1555
+ roughness is that when the roughness is sparse, the wall becomes akin to smooth wall, while
1556
+ when the porosity is sparse, the flow becomes fully-rough. This is because permeability
1557
+ increases equivalent sand grain roughness (Esteban et al. 2022). Therefore, either when the
1558
+ substrate is very sparse (𝑠+ ⩾ 60) or when the substrate thickness becomes comparable to
1559
+ pore-size (ℎ ∼ 𝑠) the substrate acts as a rough wall. In contrast, when the permeability-based
1560
+ or the pore-based Reynolds numbers are comparable to that of viscous scales, then changes in
1561
+ outer-layer velocity statistics are negligible. Therefore, the outer-layer similarity is achieved
1562
+ for two extreme cases when either the substrate is akin to rough walls or similar to a smooth
1563
+ wall (𝑅𝑒𝐾 ∼ 1).
1564
+ 6. Conclusions
1565
+ The present study quantifies the effect of wall porosity and substrate thickness on flows
1566
+ past porous foams. For a broad range of Reynolds numbers, the turbulent statistics, the
1567
+ spatio-temporal scales and energy spectra were quantified above the porous substrate within
1568
+ the boundary layer. In particular, the present manuscript extends current state-of-the-art
1569
+ (Manes et al. 2011; Efstathiou & Luhar 2018) to include the effects of foam density (𝑠+) and
1570
+ relative foam thickness (ℎ/𝑠) on turbulent boundary layer over porous walls over a range of
1571
+ 𝑅𝑒𝐾. We cover both transitionally- and fully-rough regimes and quantify the turbulent flow
1572
+ structures through the use of two-point correlations. The foam thickness-to-pore size range
1573
+ from ℎ/𝑠 ≈ 0.7 − 60, while various Reynolds numbers range from 𝑅𝑒𝜏 ≈ 2000 − 13500,
1574
+ 𝑅𝑒𝐾 ≈ 1 − 50 and 𝑠+ ≈ 75 − 400.
1575
+ Two research questions has driven the present study: 1) Is the flow over such porous
1576
+ surfaces analogous to flows over rough surfaces away from the wall? If so, does the outer-
1577
+ layer similarity in velocity statistics holds for such porous foams? 2) For what values of
1578
+ pore thickness and size can we expect to reduce the correlation of wall-normal velocity
1579
+ fluctuations?
1580
+ As it turns out these questions are interlinked for the case of flow past a permeable foam. In
1581
+ particular, the present study shows a substantial reduction in the correlations of the velocity
1582
+ fluctuations (𝑅12 and 𝑅22), at deep-dense substrate limits with high permeability based on
1583
+ Reynolds numbers (𝑅𝑒𝐾 > 1), which appears to break the Townsend’s outer-layer similarity
1584
+ and provide an avenue for using porous walls in aerofoil self-noise reduction applications.
1585
+ In particular, this is achieved by an increased relative vertical momentum exchange by an
1586
+ increase in ejection 𝑄+
1587
+ 2 and sweep 𝑄+
1588
+ 4 events across the boundary layer. Therefore, wall-
1589
+ permeability boundary condition is felt across the boundary-layer, resulting in substantial
1590
+ reduction in velocity disturbance field above the porous wall. As such, the present study
1591
+
1592
+ 26
1593
+ shows that the success of outer-layer similarity depends on the flow regime (transitionally
1594
+ rough or fully rough), pore density (𝑠+), permeability (𝑅𝑒𝐾) and relative foam thickness
1595
+ (ℎ/𝑠). Therefore, in the outer-layer, the flow over porous surfaces is analogous to flows over
1596
+ rough surfaces only at the shallow or sparse foam limits at high Reynolds number (𝑅𝑒𝜏). This
1597
+ is also evident from the fact that at sparse foam limits, spectral heterogeneity and the peak
1598
+ in spectral energy content become independent of permeability and relative foam thickness,
1599
+ respectively.
1600
+ The influence of permeability, surface roughness, and substrate structure, as well as their
1601
+ non-linear interactions, needs to be explored further. Future work should include systematic
1602
+ variations of surface roughness for a given permeability (and vice versa). This can potentially
1603
+ be achieved by adding a high permeability surface (that is rough) on top of a surface with a
1604
+ given permeability, which will enable a better understanding of the effects of roughness and
1605
+ permeability on turbulent flow over porous surfaces.
1606
+ Acknowledgements
1607
+ We acknowledge the support from E. Rodríguez-López and M.A Ferreira in the data
1608
+ acquistion phase as well as Luis Esteban-Blay and Tim Schoelle for their help in the initial
1609
+ data curation.
1610
+ Funding
1611
+ We acknowledge the financial support from EPSRC (Grant Ref no: EP/S013296/1) and
1612
+ European Office for Airforce Research and Development (Grant No: FA9550-19-1-7022,
1613
+ Programme Manager: Dr. Doug Smith).
1614
+ Declaration of interests
1615
+ The authors report no conflict of interest.
1616
+ Data availability statement
1617
+ All data supporting this study will be made openly available from the University of
1618
+ Southampton repository upon publication.
1619
+ REFERENCES
1620
+ Bailey, Brian N & Stoll, Rob 2013 Turbulence in sparse, organized vegetative canopies: a large-eddy
1621
+ simulation study. Boundary-layer meteorology 147 (3), 369–400.
1622
+ Benedict, L. H. & Gould, R. D. 1996 Towards better uncertainty estimates for turbulence statistics.
1623
+ Experiments in fluids 22 (2), 129–136.
1624
+ Blake, William K 2017 Mechanics of flow-induced sound and vibration, Volume 2: Complex flow-structure
1625
+ interactions. Academic press.
1626
+ Breugem, WP, Boersma, BJ & Uittenbogaard, RE 2006 The influence of wall permeability on turbulent
1627
+ channel flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 562, 35.
1628
+ Carpio, Alejandro Rubio, Martínez, Roberto Merino, Avallone, Francesco, Ragni, Daniele,
1629
+ Snellen, Mirjam & van der Zwaag, Sybrand 2019 Experimental characterization of the turbulent
1630
+ boundary layer over a porous trailing edge for noise abatement. Journal of Sound and Vibration 443,
1631
+ 537–558.
1632
+ Chung, D., Monty, J.P. & Ooi, A. 2014 An idealised assessment of townsend’s outer-layer similarity
1633
+ hypothesis for wall turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 742.
1634
+
1635
+ 27
1636
+ Clifton, Andrew, Manes, Costantino, Rüedi, Jean-Daniel, Guala, Michele & Lehning, Michael
1637
+ 2008 On shear-driven ventilation of snow. Boundary-layer meteorology 126 (2), 249–261.
1638
+ Efstathiou, C. & Luhar, M. 2018 Mean turbulence statistics in boundary layers over high-porosity foams.
1639
+ Journal of Fluid Mechanics 841, 351–379.
1640
+ Esteban, LB, Rodríguez-López, E, Ferreira, MA & Ganapathisubramani, B 2022 Mean flow of
1641
+ turbulent boundary layers over porous substrates. Physical Review Fluids 7 (9), 094603.
1642
+ Ferreira, M. A., Rodriguez-Lopez, E. & Ganapathisubramani, B. 2018 An alternative floating element
1643
+ design for skin-friction measurement of turbulent wall flows. Experiments in Fluids 59 (10), 155.
1644
+ Finnigan, J. 2000 Turbulence in plant canopies. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 32 (1), 519–571.
1645
+ Finnigan, John J, Shaw, Roger H & Patton, Edward G 2009 Turbulence structure above a vegetation
1646
+ canopy. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 637, 387–424.
1647
+ Foucaut, J.-M., Carlier, J. & Stanislas, M. 2004 PIV optimization for the study of turbulent flow using
1648
+ spectral analysis. Measurement Science and Technology 15 (6), 1046.
1649
+ Ganapathisubramani, B., Hutchins, N., Hambleton, W.T., Longmire, E.K. & Marusic, I. 2005
1650
+ Investigation of large-scale coherence in a turbulent boundary layer using two-point correlations.
1651
+ Journal of Fluid Mechanics 524, 57–80.
1652
+ Glegg, S. A. L & Devenport, W. J. 2017 Aeroacoustics of Low Mach Number Flow: Fundamentals,
1653
+ Analysis and Measurement. Academic Press Elsevier.
1654
+ Gul, M. & Ganapathisubramani, B. 2021 Revisiting rough-wall turbulent boundary layers over sand-grain
1655
+ roughness. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 911.
1656
+ Hahn, S., Je, J. & Choi, H. 2002 Turbulent channel flow with permeable walls. J. Fluid Mech. 450, 259–285.
1657
+ Hunt, J.C.R. & Morrison, J. F. 2000 Eddy structure in turbulent boundary layers. European Journal of
1658
+ Mechanics-B/Fluids 19 (5), 673–694.
1659
+ Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2007 Large-scale influences in near-wall turbulence. Philosophical
1660
+ Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 365 (1852),
1661
+ 647–664.
1662
+ Jaiswal, Prateek, Moreau, Stéphane, Avallone, Francesco, Ragni, Daniele & Pröbsting, Stefan
1663
+ 2020 On the use of two-point velocity correlation in wall-pressure models for turbulent flow past a
1664
+ trailing edge under adverse pressure gradient. Physics of Fluids 32 (10), 105105.
1665
+ Jaiswal, P., Pasco, Y., Yakhina, G. & Moreau, S. 2022 Experimental investigation of aerofoil tonal noise
1666
+ at low mach number. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 932.
1667
+ Jiménez, Javier 2004 Turbulent flows over rough walls. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 173–196.
1668
+ Krogstad, P.-Å & Antonia, R.A. 1994 Structure of turbulent boundary layers on smooth and rough walls.
1669
+ Journal of Fluid Mechanics 277, 1–21.
1670
+ Krogstad, P-Å, Antonia, RA & Browne, LWB 1992 Comparison between rough-and smooth-wall
1671
+ turbulent boundary layers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 245, 599–617.
1672
+ Kuwata, Y & Suga, K 2017 Direct numerical simulation of turbulence over anisotropic porous media.
1673
+ Journal of Fluid Mechanics 831, 41–71.
1674
+ Macdonald, E. F., El-Sayed, M. S., Mow, K. & Dullien, F. A. L. 1979 Flow through porous media-the
1675
+ ergun equation revisited. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 18, 199––208.
1676
+ Manes, Costantino, Poggi, Davide & Ridolfi, Luca 2011 Turbulent boundary layers over permeable
1677
+ walls: scaling and near wall structure. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 687, 141–170.
1678
+ Motlagh, S. Y. & Taghizadeh, S. 2016 Pod analysis of low reynolds turbulent porous channel flow.
1679
+ International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 61, 665–676.
1680
+ Rosti, Marco E, Cortelezzi, Luca & Quadrio, Maurizio 2015 Direct numerical simulation of turbulent
1681
+ channel flow over porous walls. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 784, 396–442.
1682
+ Schultz, MP & Flack, KA 2007 The rough-wall turbulent boundary layer from the hydraulically smooth
1683
+ to the fully rough regime. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 580, 381.
1684
+ Sharma, Akshath & García-Mayoral, Ricardo 2020a Scaling and dynamics of turbulence over sparse
1685
+ canopies. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 888.
1686
+ Sharma, Akshath & García-Mayoral, Ricardo 2020b Turbulent flows over dense filament canopies.
1687
+ Journal of Fluid Mechanics 888.
1688
+ Sillero, Juan A, Jiménez, Javier & Moser, Robert D 2014 Two-point statistics for turbulent boundary
1689
+ layers and channels at reynolds numbers up to 𝛿 + ≈ 2000. Physics of Fluids 26 (10), 105109.
1690
+ Spencer, Adrian & Hollis, David 2005 Correcting for sub-grid filtering effects in particle image
1691
+ velocimetry data. Measurement Science and Technology 16 (11), 2323.
1692
+
1693
+ 28
1694
+ Squire, D. T., Morrill-Winter, C., Hutchins, N., Schultz, M. P., Klewicki, J. C. & Marusic, I.
1695
+ 2016 Comparison of turbulent boundary layers over smooth and rough surfaces up to high reynolds
1696
+ numbers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 795, 210–240.
1697
+ Suga, K, Matsumura, Y, Ashitaka, Y, Tominaga, S & Kaneda, M 2010 Effects of wall permeability on
1698
+ turbulence. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 31 (6), 974–984.
1699
+ Townsend, AAR 1980 The structure of turbulent shear flow. Cambridge university press.
1700
+ Volino, R.J., Schultz, M.P. & Flack, K.A. 2007 Turbulence structure in rough-and smooth-wall boundary
1701
+ layers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 592, 263–293.
1702
+ Wallace, J. M. 2016 Quadrant analysis in turbulence research: history and evolution. Annual Review of
1703
+ Fluid Mechanics 48, 131–158.
1704
+ Wesson, K. H., Katul, G. G. & Siqueira, M. 2003 Quantifying organization of atmospheric turbulent
1705
+ eddy motion using nonlinear time series analysis. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 106 (3), 507–525.
1706
+ White, Brian L & Nepf, Heidi M 2007 Shear instability and coherent structures in shallow flow adjacent
1707
+ to a porous layer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 593, 1–32.
1708
+ Wu, Y & Christensen, Kenneth T 2010 Spatial structure of a turbulent boundary layer with irregular
1709
+ surface roughness. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 655, 380–418.
1710
+ Yovogan, J. & Degan, G. 2013 Effect of anisotropic permeability on convective heat transfer through a
1711
+ porous river bed underlying a fluid layer. Journal of Engineering Mathematics 81 (1), 127–140.
1712
+ Zhou, Jigen, Adrian, Ronald J, Balachandar, Sivaramakrishnan & Kendall, TM1693393 1999
1713
+ Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices in channel flow. Journal of fluid
1714
+ mechanics 387, 353–396.
1715
+
cdE2T4oBgHgl3EQfwgij/content/tmp_files/load_file.txt ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
htFMT4oBgHgl3EQf4DEU/content/tmp_files/2301.12450v1.pdf.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1882 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Anomalous behaviors in (non-)relativistic Brownian motions
2
+ Weiguo Chen,1 Carsten Greiner,2 and Zhe Xu ∗1
3
+ 1Department of Physics, Tsinghua University and Collaborative Innovation
4
+ Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing 100084, China
5
+ 2Institut f¨ur Theoretische Physik, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universit¨at Frankfurt,
6
+ Max-von-Laue-Strasse 1, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
7
+ Anomalous behaviors such as the memory of the initial state, the ballistic diffusion, and the
8
+ break of the equipartition theorem and the ergodicity in Brownian motions are investigated by
9
+ solving analytically the generalized Langevin equation of non-relativistic Brownian particles with
10
+ colored noise. These behaviors can also be observed in the Brownian motion of relativistic particles
11
+ by solving numerically the generalized Langevin equation for specially chosen memory kernels. Our
12
+ analyses give rise to think about the possible anomalous motion of heavy quarks in relativistic
13
+ heavy-ion collisions.
14
+ I.
15
+ INTRODUCTION
16
+ The Brownian motion is a famous stochastic process
17
+ exhibiting the relationship between the fluctuation and
18
+ the dissipation in statistical physics. Mathematically it is
19
+ described by the Langevin equation. The common knowl-
20
+ edge from text books by solving the Langevin equation
21
+ is that the Brownian motion is a random motion of the
22
+ Brownian particle in a fluid or gas.
23
+ In the long time
24
+ limit and with the ensemble average, the Brownian par-
25
+ ticle will reach the thermal equilibrium with the mat-
26
+ ter where it is suspended and diffuse linearly with time.
27
+ On the other hand, for specific interactions between the
28
+ Brownian particle and the particles which the matter is
29
+ made of, the fluctuation as well as the dissipation corre-
30
+ late with their former values in the motion. The current
31
+ motion is determined by the motion in the past by means
32
+ of the memory kernel in the generalized Langevin equa-
33
+ tion. This memory property can give rise to the different
34
+ diffusion from the linear one, called as the anomalous
35
+ diffusion [1–8], and break the equipartition theorem and
36
+ the ergodicity [9, 10]. One goal of this paper is to find
37
+ out the general behavior of the thermal equilibrium, dif-
38
+ fusion, and ergodicity of the Brownian particle for any
39
+ kind of memory kernels.
40
+ The motion of heavy quarks in the quark-gluon plasma
41
+ produced in relativistic heavy-ion collisions has been con-
42
+ sidered as a Brownian motion in the QCD matter and de-
43
+ scribed by the relativistic form of the Langevin equation
44
+ [11–13]. However, this treatment cannot simultaneously
45
+ explain the experimental data of the energy loss and the
46
+ collective flow of hadronic particles stemming from heavy
47
+ quarks [11, 14–24]. Could an anomalous motion of heavy
48
+ quarks explain the data? To answer this question one has
49
+ to verify at first that the anomalous behavior that can
50
+ occur in the motion of non-relativistic Brownian particles
51
+ can also occur in the motion of relativistic Brownian par-
52
+ ticles. This is another goal of this paper. The verification
53
54
+ is not trivial, since the relativistic Langevin equation is
55
+ not a linear equation and cannot be solved analytically.
56
+ The paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II we solve
57
+ the generalized Langevin equation of non-relativistic
58
+ Brownian particles analytically by employing the Laplace
59
+ technique. The memory kernels are classified into three
60
+ categories. All the behaviors are normal in the first cat-
61
+ egory. The diffusion is normal. The equipartition the-
62
+ orem and the ergodicity hold. In the second category,
63
+ the memory effect occurs, the diffusion is ballistic, and
64
+ the equipartition theorem and the ergodicity are bro-
65
+ ken.
66
+ In the third category, besides the memory effect
67
+ and the break of the ergodicity, an oscillating behavior
68
+ appears, which brings the Brownian particle out of and
69
+ back to the equilibrium periodically. We give examples
70
+ for each category of the memory kernels and present the
71
+ analytical results of the averaged kinetic energy, displace-
72
+ ment squared, and the velocity correlation function of the
73
+ Brownian particle. In Sec. III the Langevin equation of
74
+ relativistic Brownian particles is solved numerically for
75
+ the memory kernels given in the previous section. Ex-
76
+ cept for the oscillation, other anomalous behaviors are
77
+ also seen in relativistic Brownian motions.
78
+ We give a
79
+ summary in Sec.
80
+ IV and show the details in Laplace
81
+ transformations in Appendix.
82
+ II.
83
+ THE LANGEVIN EQUATION OF
84
+ NON-RELATIVISTIC BROWNIAN PARTICLES
85
+ A.
86
+ White vs. colored noise
87
+ The motion of non-relativistic Brownian particles is
88
+ described historically by the Langevin equation
89
+ m ˙v = −γv + ξ .
90
+ (1)
91
+ The change of the momentum of the Brownian particle
92
+ stems from interactions of the Brownian particle with
93
+ the molecules of the matter, where the Brownian particle
94
+ is suspended. The interactions are summed up into the
95
+ mean force, which is the friction or dissipation term −γv,
96
+ and the random force, which is the fluctuation or noise
97
+ arXiv:2301.12450v1 [hep-ph] 29 Jan 2023
98
+
99
+ 2
100
+ term ξ. The ensemble average of the noise, < ξ >, is
101
+ zero, while the time correlation of the noise is
102
+ < ξi(t)ξj(t′) >= δijαδ(t − t′) .
103
+ (2)
104
+ This noise is called white noise, since the Fourier trans-
105
+ form of the time correlation to the frequency space is a
106
+ constant.
107
+ The strength of the noise, α, and the coefficient of the
108
+ friction term, γ, should be related, since both the fluctu-
109
+ ation and the dissipation have the same origin, namely
110
+ interactions of the Brownian particle with the molecules
111
+ of the matter. Their relation can be derived as the fol-
112
+ lowing. Suppose the Brownian motion starts at t0, the
113
+ solution of Eq. (1) is
114
+ v(t) = v(t0)e− γ
115
+ m (t−t0) + 1
116
+ m
117
+ � t
118
+ t0
119
+ dt′ e− γ
120
+ m (t−t′)ξ(t′) .
121
+ (3)
122
+ We have then
123
+ < v(t) · ξ(t) >= 3α
124
+ 2m
125
+ (4)
126
+ by using Eq. (2). Making the scalar product of Eq. (1)
127
+ and v and taking the ensemble average, we obtain
128
+ < mdv
129
+ dt · v >= −γ < v · v > + < v(t) · ξ(t) > .
130
+ (5)
131
+ The left hand side is equal to m
132
+ 2
133
+ d<v2>
134
+ dt
135
+ and is zero in the
136
+ long time limit, when the Brownian particle relaxes to a
137
+ stable state. Thus,
138
+
139
+ 2m = γ < v2 > .
140
+ (6)
141
+ Assuming that the state, to which the Brownian particle
142
+ relaxes, is a thermal state, we have m < v2 > /2 =
143
+ 3kBT/2 according to the equipartition theorem.
144
+ T is
145
+ the temperature of the matter surrounding the Brownian
146
+ particle. We obtain
147
+ α = 2kBTγ .
148
+ (7)
149
+ This is the basic form of the fluctuation-dissipation theo-
150
+ rem. In turn, putting Eq. (7) into Eq. (6) we can obtain
151
+ the equipartition of the kinetic energy. Therefore, in the
152
+ case of the Brownian motion with white noise, it is not
153
+ necessary to question which is more fundamental between
154
+ the fluctuation-dissipation theorem and the assumption
155
+ of the equilibrium of the Brownian particle.
156
+ From Eq. (3) we see that in the long time limit, v(t)
157
+ does not depend on v(t0). This shows that in the long
158
+ time limit the Brownian particle looses the memory of its
159
+ initial velocity. We denote it as no memory effect.
160
+ The integral of v in Eq. (3) gives the solution of the
161
+ displacement of the Brownian particle ∆x = x(t)−x(t0).
162
+ In the long time limit one can easily obtain
163
+ < (∆x)2 >= 6Dt ,
164
+ (8)
165
+ where D = kBT/γ is the diffusion constant. We call such
166
+ diffusion the normal diffusion.
167
+ We now turn to the generalized form of the Langevin
168
+ equation (1), which reads
169
+ m ˙v(t) = −
170
+ � t
171
+ 0
172
+ dt′ Γ(t − t′)v(t′) + ξ(t)
173
+ (9)
174
+ with
175
+ < ξi(t)ξj(t′) >= δijA(t − t′) .
176
+ (10)
177
+ Here we have shifted t0 to 0. The generalized Langevin
178
+ equation describes a non-Markov process. The interac-
179
+ tions of the Brownian particle with the molecules of the
180
+ matter at earlier times also affect the current change of
181
+ momentum. This is, on the one hand, revealed by the
182
+ memory kernel Γ(t−t′). On the other hand, the noise at
183
+ the current time correlates with those at earlier times as
184
+ A(t − t′). In this case, the Fourier transform of A(t − t′)
185
+ to the frequency space has a structure other than a con-
186
+ stant. Such noise is denoted as the colored noise. The
187
+ fluctuation-dissipation theorem is now generalized to
188
+ A(t − t′) = kBT Γ(t − t′)
189
+ (11)
190
+ according to the second kind of Kubo’s law [25]. Particu-
191
+ larly, for A(t−t′) = αδ(t−t′) and Γ(t−t′) = 2γδ(t−t′),
192
+ the generalized Langevin equation (9) returns to Eq. (1)
193
+ with white noise (2), and the generalized fluctuation-
194
+ dissipation theorem (11) returns to its basic form (7). We
195
+ note that the correlation A(t − t′) is such kind of func-
196
+ tions, which Fourier transforms are non-negative [26, 27].
197
+ This applies also for Γ(t − t′) due to the fluctuation-
198
+ dissipation theorem.
199
+ The question now is whether the Brownian particle
200
+ under the colored noise will relax to the thermal equilib-
201
+ rium state. In the next subsection we will show that the
202
+ answer to this question depends on the actual functional
203
+ form of the memory kernel Γ(t − t′). For some classes
204
+ of Γ(t − t′), the Brownian particle will not relax to the
205
+ thermal equilibrium with the surrounding matter. More-
206
+ over, even in the long time limit the Brownian particle
207
+ still keeps the memory on its initial state, its diffusion
208
+ shows an anomalous behavior, and the ergodicity is bro-
209
+ ken. These results are based on the hypothesis that the
210
+ fluctuation-dissipation theorem Eq. (11) is a fundamen-
211
+ tal assumption.
212
+ B.
213
+ Analytical solutions
214
+ In this subsection we solve the generalized Langevin
215
+ equation (9) and give the analytical results of < v2 >,
216
+ < (∆x)2 >, and the correlation function of the velocity
217
+ for some chosen memory kernels.
218
+ Performing the Laplace transformation of Eq. (9) we
219
+ obtain
220
+ msv(s) − mv(0) = −Γ(s)v(s) + ξ(s) ,
221
+ (12)
222
+
223
+ 3
224
+ where s is defined in the complex space. We have then
225
+ v(s) = v(0) + 1
226
+ mξ(s)
227
+ s + 1
228
+ mΓ(s)
229
+ .
230
+ (13)
231
+ Defining the response function in the Laplace space as
232
+ G(s) =
233
+ 1
234
+ s + 1
235
+ mΓ(s) ,
236
+ (14)
237
+ Eq. (13) is rewritten to
238
+ v(s) = v(0)G(s) + 1
239
+ mG(s)ξ(s) .
240
+ (15)
241
+ We then perform the inverse Laplace transformation of
242
+ Eq. (15) and obtain
243
+ v(t) = v(0) G(t) + 1
244
+ m
245
+ � t
246
+ 0
247
+ dt′G(t − t′)ξ(t′) .
248
+ (16)
249
+ At t = 0 we find G(t = 0) = 1. With Eq. (16) we have
250
+ < v2 > (t) = v2(t)G2(t) + 1
251
+ m2
252
+ � t
253
+ 0
254
+ dt′G(t − t′) ×
255
+ ×
256
+ � t
257
+ 0
258
+ dt′′G(t − t′′) < ξ(t′′) · ξ(t′) >
259
+ = v2(0)G2(t) + 3kBT
260
+ m2
261
+ � t
262
+ 0
263
+ dt′G(t − t′) ×
264
+ ×
265
+ � t
266
+ 0
267
+ dt′′G(t − t′′)Γ(t′′ − t′) .
268
+ (17)
269
+ After some steps, which can be found in Appendix, we
270
+ get the final result
271
+ < v2 > (t) = v2(0)G2(t) + 3kBT
272
+ m
273
+
274
+ 1 − G2(t)
275
+
276
+ .
277
+ (18)
278
+ In particular, for Γ(t − t′) = 2γδ(t − t′), we get Γ(s) =
279
+ γ, G(s) = 1/(s + γ/m). By taking the inverse Laplace
280
+ transformation we get G(t) = e−γt/m. The solution (16)
281
+ is identical to Eq. (3). In the long time limit, G(t →
282
+ ∞) = 0, we get 1
283
+ 2m < v2 >= 3
284
+ 2kBT, which agrees with
285
+ the equipartition theorem at the thermal state.
286
+ Before we present the results of < v2 > (t) for some
287
+ chosen memory kernels, we now discuss generally the long
288
+ time behavior of < v2 > and give the answer whether the
289
+ Brownian particle will relax to the thermal state. From
290
+ Eq. (18) it is obvious that if the Brownian particles are
291
+ initially in thermal state, i.m., < v2 > (0) = 3kBT/m,
292
+ they stay always in thermal state, < v2 > (t) = 3kBT/m,
293
+ regardless of the actual form of the memory kernel. For
294
+ the case that the Brownian particles are initially out of
295
+ thermal equilibrium, they will approach to the thermal
296
+ state, only if G(t → ∞) = 0. In the following we exam-
297
+ ine G(t → ∞) for non-thermal initial state of Brownian
298
+ particles.
299
+ Performing the inverse Laplace transformation we have
300
+ G(t) = L−1[G(s)] =
301
+ 1
302
+ 2πi
303
+ � β+i∞
304
+ β−i∞
305
+ ds G(s)est
306
+ =
307
+ 1
308
+ 2πi
309
+ � β+i∞
310
+ β−i∞
311
+ ds
312
+ 1
313
+ s + 1
314
+ mΓ(s)est .
315
+ (19)
316
+ The integral area should be chosen to ensure that the
317
+ integral is convergent. So we choose the left half of the
318
+ complex plane with respect to the imaginary axis (the
319
+ real part is negative). Along the semicircle with the in-
320
+ finite radius the integral vanishes. Suppose G(s) have n
321
+ single poles sj = σj + iωj, j = 1, 2, · · · , n. G(s) can be
322
+ written to
323
+ G(s) =
324
+ n
325
+
326
+ j=1
327
+ aj
328
+ s − sj
329
+ ,
330
+ (20)
331
+ where
332
+ aj = lim
333
+ s→sj(s − sj)G(s) .
334
+ (21)
335
+ Thus we obtain
336
+ G(t) =
337
+ n
338
+
339
+ j=1
340
+ aj esjt
341
+ (22)
342
+ according to the residue theorem.
343
+ We classify memory kernels according to the position
344
+ of poles of G(s).
345
+ At first, if no poles are located on
346
+ the imaginary axis, the real part of esjt is eσjt with a
347
+ negative σj.
348
+ Therefore, we have G(t → ∞) = 0.
349
+ In
350
+ this case, the Brownian particle will relax to the thermal
351
+ equilibrium with the surrounding matter. For example,
352
+ we choose [28, 29]
353
+ Γ1(t − t′) = γ
354
+ 2τ e− |t−t′|
355
+ τ
356
+ .
357
+ (23)
358
+ Its Laplace transform is
359
+ Γ1(s) =
360
+ γ
361
+ 2(1 + sτ) .
362
+ (24)
363
+ G1(s) has two poles located in the left half of the complex
364
+ plane and not on the imaginary axis. Therefore, G1(t →
365
+ ∞) = 0.
366
+ Secondly, we consider the case that only one of the
367
+ poles is located on the imaginary axis and specially at
368
+ s = 0. In this case it should be Γ(s = 0) = 0 [see Eq.
369
+ (14)]. We have G(t → ∞) = a1, where
370
+ a1 = lim
371
+ s→0 sG(s) = lim
372
+ s→0
373
+ s
374
+ s + 1
375
+ mΓ(s)
376
+ =
377
+ 1
378
+ 1 + 1
379
+ m
380
+ dΓ(s)
381
+ ds
382
+ ���
383
+ s=0
384
+
385
+ 1
386
+ 1 + Q
387
+ (25)
388
+
389
+ 4
390
+ with
391
+ Q =
392
+ 1
393
+ m
394
+ d
395
+ ds
396
+ � ∞
397
+ 0
398
+ dt Γ(t)e−st
399
+ ����
400
+ s=0
401
+ = − 1
402
+ m
403
+ � ∞
404
+ 0
405
+ dt Γ(t)t .
406
+ (26)
407
+ We see that G(t → ∞) is nonzero.
408
+ The equipartition
409
+ theorem is broken and the Brownian particle will relax
410
+ to a certain state, but not to the thermal equilibrium with
411
+ the surrounding matter. In addition, from Eq. (18) we
412
+ see that the term v2(0)G2(t) contributes to < v2 > (t),
413
+ which indicates that in the long time limit the Brownian
414
+ particle still keeps the memory of its initial state. This
415
+ is the memory effect.
416
+ From Eq. (18) we also see that G(t) is smaller than 1,
417
+ because < v2 > is always positive, also for v(0) = 0. If
418
+ v(0) = 0, the kinetic energy m < v2 > /2 will reach a
419
+ smaller value than that from the equipartition theorem.
420
+ G(t) < 1 also leads to a1 < 1 and thus Q > 0.
421
+ We
422
+ realize that in this case negative correlations, Γ(t) < 0
423
+ at some time interval, will occur.
424
+ This indicates that
425
+ the mean force does not always decelerate the Brownian
426
+ particle.
427
+ It will also accelerate the Brownian particle.
428
+ This might be the physical reason, why the Brownian
429
+ particle cannot approach to the thermal equilibrium with
430
+ the surrounding matter.
431
+ We choose for example [28]
432
+ Γ2(t − t′) = γ
433
+
434
+
435
+ 1 − |t − t′|
436
+ τ
437
+
438
+ e− |t−t′|
439
+ τ
440
+ ,
441
+ (27)
442
+ which falls down to be negative at t − t′ = τ and ap-
443
+ proaches to 0 at large t − t′ from the negative side. This
444
+ correlation resembles that for studying the non-Markov
445
+ dissipative evolution of the chiral fields [27]. The Laplace
446
+ transform is
447
+ Γ2(s) =
448
+ γsτ
449
+ 4(1 + sτ)2 .
450
+ (28)
451
+ G2(s) has one pole at s = 0 and other two poles in the
452
+ left half of the complex plane and not on the imaginary
453
+ axis.
454
+ Thirdly, some poles are located on the imaginary axis,
455
+ but not at s = 0. These poles appear in pairs symmetric
456
+ to s = 0, s1,2 = ��iω1 for instance. We can write G(s) to
457
+ the form
458
+ G(s) =
459
+ k
460
+
461
+ j=1
462
+
463
+ aj
464
+ s − iωj
465
+ +
466
+ a∗
467
+ j
468
+ s + iωj
469
+
470
+ +
471
+ n
472
+
473
+ j=2k+1
474
+ aj
475
+ s − sj
476
+ . (29)
477
+ We obtain G(∞) = limt→∞
478
+ �k
479
+ j=1 2[Re(aj) cos(ωjt) −
480
+ Im(aj) sin(ωjt)]. The oscillations of G(t) are not damped
481
+ in the long time limit due to the absence of the real part
482
+ of the poles. In this case the Brownian particle will not
483
+ even approach to a steady state. On the other hand, G(t)
484
+ oscillates across zero. When G(t) is zero, the Brownian
485
+ particle is at the thermal equilibrium. So, in the long
486
+ time limit, the Brownian particle goes out of and returns
487
+ to the thermal equilibrium circularly.
488
+ We present now the analytical results of G(t) for some
489
+ chosen memory kernels Γ(t − t′). For Γ1(t − t′) [see Eqs.
490
+ (23)] we obtain results for two cases. If B ≡
491
+
492
+ 1 − 2γτ/m
493
+ is real, we have
494
+ G11(t) =
495
+
496
+ cosh
497
+
498
+ B t
499
+
500
+
501
+ + 1
502
+ B sinh
503
+
504
+ B t
505
+
506
+ ��
507
+ e− t
508
+ 2τ . (30)
509
+ If B is pure imaginary, we define B′
510
+ =
511
+ −iB
512
+ =
513
+
514
+ 2γτ/m − 1 and have
515
+ G12(t) =
516
+
517
+ cos
518
+
519
+ B′ t
520
+
521
+
522
+ + 1
523
+ B′ sin
524
+
525
+ B′ t
526
+
527
+ ��
528
+ e− t
529
+ 2τ .
530
+ (31)
531
+ For Γ2(t − t′) [see Eq. (27)] we obtain
532
+ G2(t) =
533
+ 1
534
+ 1 + C +
535
+
536
+ C
537
+ 1 + C cos
538
+ �√
539
+ C t
540
+ τ
541
+
542
+ +
543
+
544
+ C
545
+ 1 + C sin
546
+ �√
547
+ C t
548
+ τ
549
+ ��
550
+ e− t
551
+ τ ,
552
+ (32)
553
+ where C = γτ/(4m).
554
+ For the last case we choose
555
+ Γ3(t−t′) = γ
556
+ 1 + ω2τ 2
557
+ 2τ(ω2τ 2 + 1 − ϵ)[1−ϵ cos(ω|t−t′|)]e− |t−t′|
558
+ τ
559
+ ,
560
+ (33)
561
+ which has a oscillating disturbance.
562
+ The amplitude ϵ
563
+ should be
564
+ ϵ ≤ 4
565
+ W
566
+ ��
567
+ (W + 1)(W + 4) − W − 2
568
+
569
+ (34)
570
+ with W = ω2τ 2, so that the Fourier transform of Γ3(t−t′)
571
+ is non-negative. The Laplace transform of Γ3(t − t′) is
572
+ Γ3(s) = γ′
573
+
574
+ 1
575
+ 1 + sτ − ϵ
576
+ 1 + sτ
577
+ W + (1 + sτ)2
578
+
579
+ ,
580
+ (35)
581
+ where
582
+ γ′ = γ
583
+ W + 1
584
+ 2(W + 1 − ϵ) .
585
+ (36)
586
+ G3(s) has four poles. Two of them are located in the
587
+ left half of the complex plane, while another two poles
588
+ are on the imaginary axis, when γ′ is the solution of the
589
+ equation
590
+ 2(1 − ϵ)2τ 2γ′2 + mτ[(1 − ϵ)(8 + 5W) − 9W]γ′
591
+ +2m2(W + 1)(W + 4) = 0 .
592
+ (37)
593
+ The condition that the above equation has a solution is
594
+ ϵ ≥ 4
595
+ W
596
+ ��
597
+ (W + 1)(W + 4) − W − 2
598
+
599
+ .
600
+ (38)
601
+ Together with the condition (34) we have
602
+ ϵ = 4
603
+ W
604
+ ��
605
+ (W + 1)(W + 4) − W − 2
606
+
607
+ .
608
+ (39)
609
+
610
+ 5
611
+ We see that ϵ is fixed for given ωτ. With this we obtain
612
+ γτ
613
+ m = 2(W + 1 − ϵ)
614
+ W + 1
615
+
616
+ (W + 1)(W + 4)
617
+ 1 − ϵ
618
+ .
619
+ (40)
620
+ The strength of the memory kernel, γ, is not a free pa-
621
+ rameter. It relates to the frequency of the oscillation ω,
622
+ the decay time scale τ, and the mass of the Brownian
623
+ particle m. This indicates that the case that poles are
624
+ located on the imaginary axis (not at the origin) hardly
625
+ occurs. This is different from Γ1(t − t′) and Γ2(t − t′),
626
+ in which γ and τ are free parameters. After a lengthy
627
+ derivation we obtain
628
+ G3(t) =
629
+ 1
630
+ 1 + 1
631
+ 2
632
+
633
+ W +1
634
+ W +4
635
+ cos
636
+ ��
637
+ Z − 6W − 3
638
+ 6
639
+ t
640
+ τ
641
+
642
+ +
643
+ 1
644
+ 1 + 2
645
+
646
+ W +4
647
+ W +1
648
+
649
+ 3
650
+
651
+ 3
652
+
653
+ Z
654
+ sin
655
+ � √
656
+ Z
657
+ 2
658
+
659
+ 3
660
+ t
661
+ τ
662
+
663
+ + cos
664
+ � √
665
+ Z
666
+ 2
667
+
668
+ 3
669
+ t
670
+ τ
671
+ ��
672
+ e− 3t
673
+ 2τ ,
674
+ (41)
675
+ where Z = 8W + 4
676
+
677
+ (W + 1)(W + 4) + 5.
678
+ From the dependence of G11 on B, G12 on B′, G2 on
679
+ C, and G3 on W we realize that all G’s, as functions of
680
+ t/τ, are fixed by the only parameter γτ/m. The same is
681
+ FIG. 1: Examples of the memory kernels (upper panel) and
682
+ the response functions (lower panel) as functions of t/τ. The
683
+ memory kernels are multiplied by τ 2/m.
684
+ FIG. 2: The time evolution of the average kinetic energy of
685
+ the Brownian particle under the white noise and the colored
686
+ noise with the chosen memory kernels. The initial momentum
687
+ of the Brownian particle is set to be zero.
688
+ also for the memory kernels Γ1, Γ2, and Γ3 multiplied by
689
+ τ 2/m. Figure 1 shows the chosen memory kernels (times
690
+ τ 2/m) and the respective G’s as functions of t/τ. The
691
+ curves of Γ1 with B′ = 3 and Γ3 with W = 2 are divided
692
+ by 10.
693
+ In Fig. 2 we show the time evolution of the average
694
+ kinetic energy of the Brownian particle, < Ek >= m <
695
+ v2 > /2, scaled by kBT, according to Eq.
696
+ (18).
697
+ The
698
+ initial momentum of the Brownian particle, p0 = mv(0),
699
+ is set to be zero. The solid curve depicts the result under
700
+ the white noise, where G(t) = e−t/τ as derived before.
701
+ Here τ denotes m/γ and thus, γτ/m = 1. Other curves
702
+ depict the results under the colored noise with the mem-
703
+ ory kernels given before and shown in Fig. 1. We see
704
+ that the averaged kinetic energy of the Brownian parti-
705
+ cle under the white noise and the colored noise with Γ1
706
+ approaches to the value according to the equipartition
707
+ theorem.
708
+ This corresponds to the case that the poles
709
+ of the response function G(s), the Laplace transform of
710
+ G(t), locate in the left half of the complex plane and not
711
+ on the imaginary axis. For the case with Γ2, where one
712
+ of the poles of G(s) is at the origin, s = 0, the aver-
713
+ aged kinetic energy is less than the value according to
714
+ the equipartition theorem. Finally, for the case with Γ3,
715
+ where two of the poles of G(s) are on the imaginary axis,
716
+ the averaged kinetic energy oscillates. At the peaks it
717
+ reaches the value according to the equipartition theorem.
718
+ The difference between the peak and the trough equals
719
+ to the square of the amplitude of the first term of G3(t)
720
+ times 3/2 [see Eqs. (41) and (18)] and varies between
721
+ 24/25 for W → 0 and 2/3 for W → ∞.
722
+ By comparing with Fig. 2, the memory effect can be
723
+ observed in Fig. 3, where the initial momentum is set
724
+ to be p0 = √mkBT. Again, in the long time limit, the
725
+
726
+ -1, B=0.5
727
+ 0.4
728
+ - I1, B'=3, divided by 10
729
+ .I2, C=0.25
730
+ -I3, W=2, divided by 10
731
+ 0.0
732
+ (a)
733
+ - G11, B=0.5
734
+ - G12, B'=3
735
+ ... G2, C=0.25
736
+ _G3, W=2
737
+ G(t/ T)
738
+ 0
739
+ (b)
740
+ 10
741
+ 15
742
+ 20
743
+ t/ T3
744
+ white noise
745
+ - 1. B=0.5
746
+ - - I1, B'=3
747
+ 2
748
+ -I3, W=2
749
+ / kB
750
+ po/VmkB T =0
751
+ 5
752
+ 10
753
+ t /T6
754
+ FIG. 3: Same as Fig. 2. The initial momentum is set to be
755
+ p0 = √mkBT.
756
+ averaged kinetic energy of the Brownian particle under
757
+ the white noise and the colored noise with Γ1 approaches
758
+ to the value according to the equipartition theorem. In
759
+ these cases no memory effect is expected. From the re-
760
+ sults with Γ2 and Γ3 we do see the memory effect. The
761
+ larger the initial momentum, the larger is the averaged
762
+ kinetic energy of the Brownian particle with Γ2 in the
763
+ long time limit. In the case of Γ3, for p0 < √3mkBT, the
764
+ averaged kinetic energy at long times reaches the value
765
+ according to the equipartition at the peaks of the oscil-
766
+ lation. The difference between the peak and the trough
767
+ is decreasing to zero, when the initial momentum is in-
768
+ creasing from zero to √3mkBT. For p0 > √3mkBT, the
769
+ averaged kinetic energy at long times reaches the value
770
+ according to the equipartition at the troughs of the oscil-
771
+ lation. The difference between the peak and the trough
772
+ is increasing for the increasing initial momentum.
773
+ We now study the diffusion behavior of the Brown-
774
+ ian particle with the colored noise.
775
+ Since v = ˙x, the
776
+ Langevin equation (9) can be rewritten to
777
+ m¨x = −
778
+ � t
779
+ 0
780
+ dt′Γ(t − t′) ˙x(t′) + ξ(t) .
781
+ (42)
782
+ Performing the Laplace transformation to Eq. (42) and
783
+ proceeding the same steps such as solving Eq. (9), we
784
+ obtain the analytical results of < (∆x)2 >,
785
+ < (∆x)2 > (t) = v2(0)H2(t) + 3kBT
786
+ m
787
+
788
+ 2
789
+ � t
790
+ 0
791
+ dt′H(t − t′)
792
+ −H2(t)
793
+
794
+ ,
795
+ (43)
796
+ where
797
+ H(t) = L−1[H(s)] and H(s) = 1
798
+ sG(s) .
799
+ (44)
800
+ Since H(t = 0) = 0, we have
801
+ ˙H(t) = G(t).
802
+ For the
803
+ known G(t) the analytical results of < (∆x)2 > (t) can
804
+ be easily calculated. In the following we discuss its long
805
+ time behavior.
806
+ (i) For the case that the poles of G(s) are located in
807
+ the left half of the complex plane and not on the
808
+ imaginary axis such as for the white noise and for
809
+ the colored noise with Γ1, H(s) has an additional
810
+ pole at s = 0 due to Eq. (44). In the long time limit
811
+ we have H(t) → G(s = 0) and thus < (∆x)2 >
812
+ (t) → 6kBTG(s = 0)t/m, which is proportional
813
+ to t. This is the normal diffusion. For the white
814
+ noise, G(s = 0) = m/γ, we get < (∆x)2 > (t) →
815
+ 6kBTt/γ = 6Dt ∼ t, which agrees with Eq. (8)
816
+ in the previous subsection. For Γ1, G1(s = 0) =
817
+ 2m/γ, we get < (∆x)2 > (t) → 12kBTt/γ ∼ t.
818
+ Therefore,
819
+ m < (∆x)2 > |wn
820
+ kBTτ 2
821
+ → 6 t
822
+ τ ,
823
+ (45)
824
+ m < (∆x)2 > |Γ1
825
+ kBTτ 2
826
+ → 12 m
827
+ γτ
828
+ t
829
+ τ .
830
+ (46)
831
+ (ii) For the case that one pole of G(s) is located at
832
+ s = 0 and the other poles are located in the left
833
+ half of the complex plane and not on the imaginary
834
+ axis such as for the colored noise with Γ2, H(s) has
835
+ a two-fold pole at s = 0. In the long time limit
836
+ H(t) goes to the residue of H(s)est at s = 0, which
837
+ is d[s2H(s)est]/ds at s = 0. For Γ2 it equals to
838
+ 2τC/(1 + C)2 + t/(1 + C) with C = γτ/(4m). We
839
+ obtain < (∆x)2 > (t) → [v2(0)+3kBTC/m]t2/(1+
840
+ C)2 ∼ t2 and
841
+ m < (∆x)2 > |Γ2
842
+ kBTτ 2
843
+ → mv2(0)/(kBT) + 3C
844
+ (1 + C)2
845
+ � t
846
+ τ
847
+ �2
848
+ .
849
+ (47)
850
+ The diffusion with a parabolic dependence of <
851
+ (∆x)2 > on t is an anomalous diffusion and called
852
+ the ballistic diffusion.
853
+ (iii) For the case that some pols of G(s) are located on
854
+ the imaginary axis but not at s = 0 and the other
855
+ poles are located in the left half of the complex
856
+ plane such as for the colored noise with Γ3, the
857
+ poles on the imaginary axis lead to the oscillation
858
+ of H(t) with constant amplitudes. The long time
859
+ behavior is dominated by the pole of H(s) at s = 0
860
+ like in case (i). For Γ3 we get G3(s = 0) = 2m/γ,
861
+ < (∆x)2 > (t) → 12kBTt/γ ∼ t and
862
+ m < (∆x)2 > |Γ3
863
+ kBTτ 2
864
+ → 12 m
865
+ γτ
866
+ t
867
+ τ .
868
+ (48)
869
+ This is again the normal diffusion.
870
+ Figure 4 shows the time evolution of the average dis-
871
+ placement squared of the Brownian particle scaled by
872
+ kBTτ 2/m. The results with the white noise, Γ1 (B =
873
+ 0.5), and Γ2 are divided by 10. We see that the average
874
+
875
+ 3.
876
+ white noise
877
+ - I1, B=0.5
878
+ - 1,B'=3
879
+ .. 2, C=0.25
880
+ 2
881
+ -I3, W=2
882
+ / KB
883
+ po/VmkB T =1
884
+ V
885
+ 5
886
+ 10
887
+ 0
888
+ t /T7
889
+ FIG. 4:
890
+ The time evolution of the average displacement
891
+ squared of the Brownian particle under the white noise and
892
+ the colored noise with various memory kernels.
893
+ The ini-
894
+ tial momentum of the Brownian particle is set to be p0 =
895
+ √mkBT. The results with the white noise, Γ1 (B = 0.5), and
896
+ Γ2 are divided by 10.
897
+ displacement squared of the Brownian particle under the
898
+ white noise and the colored noise with Γ1 is linear in time
899
+ in the long time limit, whereas it is parabolic in time for
900
+ the colored noise with Γ2 and is oscillating along a linear
901
+ line in time for the colored noise with Γ3.
902
+ Finally we discuss briefly the ergodicity in the Brown-
903
+ ian motion with the colored noise. The ergodicity states
904
+ that the ensemble average of a variable equals its time
905
+ average in the infinite-time limit.
906
+ The necessary con-
907
+ dition of the ergodicity is given by Khinchin’s theorem
908
+ [8], which declares that the auto-correlation CO(t, t′) =<
909
+ O(t)O(t′) > − < O(t) >< O(t′) > of a stochastic vari-
910
+ able O(t) should vanish in the limit t → ∞ at fixed
911
+ t′ ≫ t0. For the sufficient condition of the ergodicity,
912
+ the newly defined quantity WO =
913
+ � ∞
914
+ t′ CO(t, t′)dt should
915
+ be finite and non-zero [30]. In the following we examine
916
+ Cv(t, t′) and Wv for various given memory kernels.
917
+ The derivation of < v(t) · v(t′) > from Eq.
918
+ (16) is
919
+ similar to that of < v2 > (t). The result is
920
+ Cv(t, t′) = 3kBT
921
+ m
922
+ [G(t − t′) − G(t)G(t′)] .
923
+ (49)
924
+ For the white noise and the colored noise with the first
925
+ class of the memory kernel such as Γ1(t − t′), G(t →
926
+ ∞) = 0 and we have limt→∞ Cv(t, t′) = 0 at fixed t′. To
927
+ prove the validity of the ergodicity, we calculate Wv for
928
+ these two cases. We obtain
929
+ Wwn
930
+ v
931
+ = 3kBT
932
+ γ
933
+
934
+ 1 − e−2γt′/m�
935
+ ≈ 3kBT
936
+ γ
937
+ (50)
938
+ for large t′ in the case of the white noise, and
939
+ W 1
940
+ v ≈ 6kBT
941
+ γ
942
+ (51)
943
+ for large t′ in the case of the colored noise with Γ1. In
944
+ these two cases the ergodicity holds.
945
+ For the colored noise with other memory kernels such
946
+ as Γ2 and Γ3, the limits of G2(t) and G3(t) [see Eqs.
947
+ (32) and (41)] do not go to zero for t → ∞.
948
+ Thus,
949
+ limt→∞ Cv(t, t′) does not go to zero either. In these two
950
+ cases the ergodicity is broken. In general, the ergodic-
951
+ ity is broken when G(s) has poles on the imaginal axis.
952
+ This result does not depend on the initial state, which
953
+ is different from the equilibation. As we have noticed,
954
+ the equipartition theorem is broken for the cases with
955
+ Γ2 and Γ3, if the initial Brownian particles are out of
956
+ thermal equilibrium.
957
+ C.
958
+ Numerical calculations
959
+ In this subsection, we solve the Langevin equation (9)
960
+ numerically. Comparing to the conventional numerical
961
+ method for solving ordinary differential equations, here
962
+ we have to generate series of noise from its time correla-
963
+ tion [see Eqs. (10) and (11)]. The details of the genera-
964
+ tion of white and colored noise and the numerical method
965
+ can be found in Ref. [27].
966
+ We have two purposes for performing the numerical
967
+ calculations. At first we test our numerical computations
968
+ by comparing the numerical results with the analytical
969
+ ones, in order to prepare a well-tested numerical code for
970
+ solving the relativistic Langevin equation, which is in-
971
+ troduced and investigated in the next section. Secondly,
972
+ we want to calculate the momentum distribution of the
973
+ Brownian particle in the long time limit in the cases of
974
+ the colored noise with Γ2 and Γ3, since obviously these
975
+ distributions cannot be obtained analytically.
976
+ From the previous subsection we notice that the
977
+ Langevin equation (9) can be nondimensionalized. Defin-
978
+ ing the dimensionless quantities ˜p = mv/√mkBT and
979
+ ˜t = t/τ we obtain
980
+ d˜p
981
+ d˜t = −
982
+ � ˜t
983
+ 0
984
+ d˜t′ ˜Γ(˜t − ˜t′)˜p(˜t′) + ˜ξ(˜t) ,
985
+ (52)
986
+ where
987
+ ˜Γ(˜t − ˜t′) = τ 2
988
+ m Γ(t − t′) ,
989
+ (53)
990
+ which is dimensionless.
991
+ Examples are plotted in the
992
+ upper panel of Fig.
993
+ 1.
994
+ The dimensionless noise is
995
+ ˜ξ(˜t) = ξ(t)τ/√mkBT with
996
+ < ˜ξi(˜t)˜ξj(˜t′) >= δij ˜Γ(˜t − ˜t′) .
997
+ (54)
998
+ Remind that τ is the decay time scale of the memory
999
+ kernels. For the given memory kernels [see Eqs. (23),
1000
+ (27), and (33)] the only free parameter in Eq. (52) is
1001
+ γτ/m.
1002
+ Figure 5 shows one colored noise sequence in the case
1003
+ of Γ3 with W = 2. Its time correlation function is shown
1004
+
1005
+ 140
1006
+ white noise
1007
+ -I1,B=0.5
1008
+ 120
1009
+ - 1,B'=3
1010
+ I2, C=0.25
1011
+ 100
1012
+ dy)
1013
+ I3, W=2
1014
+ po
1015
+ 80
1016
+ =1
1017
+ Λ
1018
+ VmkB T
1019
+ xV
1020
+ 60
1021
+ V
1022
+ m
1023
+ 40
1024
+ 20
1025
+ 5
1026
+ 10
1027
+ 15
1028
+ 20
1029
+ 25
1030
+ 30
1031
+ 35
1032
+ 40
1033
+ t /T8
1034
+ FIG. 5: Colored noise sequence.
1035
+ FIG. 6: Time correlation function of the noise with Γ3.
1036
+ in Fig. 6, where the numerical result agrees well with
1037
+ the given correlation function. 50000 series of noise have
1038
+ been generated.
1039
+ We have checked the time evolution of the average ki-
1040
+ netic energy and displacement squared. The numerical
1041
+ results (not shown) agree well with the analytical ones
1042
+ presented in the previous subsection, see Figs. 2, 3, and
1043
+ 4.
1044
+ The momentum distributions of the Brownian particle
1045
+ at long times are shown in Fig. 7 and compared with the
1046
+ Maxwell-Boltzmann distributions. For the case with Γ3,
1047
+ the distributions are calculated at the times when the av-
1048
+ erage kinetic energy reaches its maximum (peak) as well
1049
+ as its minimum (trough), see Fig. 2. From Fig. 7 we
1050
+ see that the distribution of the Brownian particle with
1051
+ Γ3 at the peak agrees well with the Maxwell-Boltzmann
1052
+ FIG. 7: The momentum distribution of the Brownian particle
1053
+ in the long time limit.
1054
+ distribution with the temperature T of the surrounding
1055
+ matter. This is expected from the study in the previ-
1056
+ ous subsection that the Brownian particle is in thermal
1057
+ equilibrium at peaks of the average kinetic energy in the
1058
+ long time limit.
1059
+ It is also seen, as expected, that the
1060
+ momentum distributions of the Brownian particle with
1061
+ Γ2 and with Γ3 at the trough are not in thermal equilib-
1062
+ rium with the surrounding matter. However, they look
1063
+ like the Maxwell-Boltzmann distributions with different
1064
+ “temperatures”.
1065
+ If so, then these “temperatures” can
1066
+ be obtained by the values of the average kinetic energy
1067
+ in the long time limit according to Eq. (18). For the
1068
+ Brownian motion with Γ2 we have
1069
+ 3
1070
+ 2kBT ′ = 1
1071
+ 2m < v2 > (t → ∞)
1072
+ = 3
1073
+ 2kBT
1074
+
1075
+ 1 − G2
1076
+ 2(t → ∞)
1077
+
1078
+ = 3
1079
+ 2kBT
1080
+
1081
+ 1 −
1082
+ 1
1083
+ (1 + C)2
1084
+
1085
+ ,
1086
+ (55)
1087
+ while for the Brownian motion with Γ3 at the trough we
1088
+ have
1089
+ 3
1090
+ 2kBT ′′ = 3
1091
+ 2kBT
1092
+
1093
+ 1 − G2
1094
+ 3(t → ∞, at the trough)
1095
+
1096
+ = 3
1097
+ 2kBT
1098
+
1099
+ ��1 −
1100
+ 1
1101
+
1102
+ 1 + 1
1103
+ 2
1104
+
1105
+ W +1
1106
+ W +4
1107
+ �2
1108
+
1109
+ �� .
1110
+ (56)
1111
+ We plot the Maxwell-Boltzmann distributions with T ′
1112
+ and T ′′ in Fig.
1113
+ 7 and see agreements of these distri-
1114
+ butions with the numerical results. This indicates that
1115
+ in the long time limit the Brownian particle always gets
1116
+ thermalized. It may be the result of the use of the Gaus-
1117
+ sian noise. The “temperature” that the Brownian parti-
1118
+
1119
+ noise sequence (dimensionless)
1120
+ 2
1121
+ 4
1122
+ 6
1123
+ 8
1124
+ 10
1125
+ t /T0.4
1126
+ numerical simulations
1127
+ expected
1128
+ normalized correlation
1129
+ 0.2
1130
+ 0
1131
+ 0
1132
+ 2
1133
+ 4
1134
+ 6
1135
+ 8
1136
+ t / T1.5
1137
+ - I2(t), C=0.25
1138
+ --- I3(t), W=2, trough
1139
+ - I3(t), W=2, peak
1140
+ - MB distribution with T
1141
+ MB distribution with T'
1142
+ - MB distribution with T
1143
+ d pN/ Np
1144
+ po=0
1145
+ 0.5
1146
+ 0
1147
+ 2
1148
+ 4
1149
+ 6
1150
+ p9
1151
+ cle feels is in some cases not the temperature of the mat-
1152
+ ter, where the Brownian particle is suspended. Therefore,
1153
+ the attempt to use the Brownian particle to probe an un-
1154
+ known matter may become difficult because of possible
1155
+ occurrence of anomalous behaviors.
1156
+ III.
1157
+ THE LANGEVIN EQUATION OF
1158
+ RELATIVISTIC BROWNIAN PARTICLES
1159
+ Assume that the matter, where the Brownian particle
1160
+ is suspended, remains at rest. Then, the Langevin equa-
1161
+ tion (9) can be extended to a form applied to relativistic
1162
+ particles [31–37],
1163
+ ˙p(t) = −
1164
+ � t
1165
+ 0
1166
+ dt′ Γ(t − t′)p(t′)c2
1167
+ E(t′) + ξ(t) ,
1168
+ (57)
1169
+ where p is the momentum and E =
1170
+
1171
+ p2c2 + m2
1172
+ 0c4 is the
1173
+ energy of the Brownian particle with the rest mass m0.
1174
+ Its reduced form with the white noise is
1175
+ ˙p = −γ pc2
1176
+ E + ξ .
1177
+ (58)
1178
+ The time correlation functions of the noise are same as
1179
+ those in Eqs. (10) and (2), respectively.
1180
+ Similar to Eq.
1181
+ (3), the formal solution of Eq.
1182
+ (58)
1183
+ reads
1184
+ p(t) = p(t0)e−γ
1185
+ � t
1186
+ t0
1187
+ dt′c2
1188
+ E
1189
+ +
1190
+ � t
1191
+ t0
1192
+ ds e−γ
1193
+ � t
1194
+ s
1195
+ ds′c2
1196
+ E ξ(s) .
1197
+ (59)
1198
+ We have then < p · ξ >= 3α/2, which is same as Eq.
1199
+ (4) in the case for non-relativistic Brownian particles.
1200
+ Taking the ensemble average of the scalar product of Eq.
1201
+ (58) with p, we obtain
1202
+ 1
1203
+ 2
1204
+ d
1205
+ dt < p2 >= −γ < p2c2
1206
+ E
1207
+ > +3α
1208
+ 2 .
1209
+ (60)
1210
+ If the Brownian particle reaches the thermal equilibrium
1211
+ in the long time limit, the left hand side of the above
1212
+ equation vanishes and < p2c2/E >= 3kBT by using the
1213
+ relativistic Boltzmann distribution f = exp[−E/(kBT)].
1214
+ The same fluctuation-dissipation theorem as Eq. (7) is
1215
+ derived in the relativistic case.
1216
+ Therefore, we assume
1217
+ that the general fluctuation-dissipation theorem (11) is
1218
+ also valid for relativistic Brownian particles, because a
1219
+ memory kernel having the δ-function form reduces the
1220
+ Langevin equation from Eq. (57) to Eq. (58) and the
1221
+ fluctuation-dissipation theorem from Eq. (11) to Eq. (7).
1222
+ We notice that from the assumption of the fluctuation-
1223
+ dissipation theorem we can also derive that the relativis-
1224
+ tic Brownian particle under the white noise will reach the
1225
+ thermal equilibrium in the long time limit.
1226
+ It is obvious that both Eqs.
1227
+ (57) and (58) are not
1228
+ linear differential-integral equations and thus, cannot be
1229
+ solved analytically by using the Laplace transformation
1230
+ as performed in the non-relativistic case. Even the solu-
1231
+ tion (59) can only be calculated numerically, since E on
1232
+ the right hand side of Eq. (59) is a function of p at times
1233
+ before t. Even though we can derive that the Brownian
1234
+ particle under the white noise can reach the thermal equi-
1235
+ librium in the long tine limit, but we cannot determine
1236
+ the behavior of the diffusion and ergodicity analytically.
1237
+ In the following we solve the Langevin equations (57)
1238
+ and (58) by using the numerical code mentioned and well
1239
+ tested in the previous section. We will study the equili-
1240
+ bration, memory effect, diffusion and ergodicity of Brow-
1241
+ nian particles under the white noise and the colored noise
1242
+ with the memory kernels Γ1, Γ2, and Γ3 given in the pre-
1243
+ vious section.
1244
+ Like Eq.
1245
+ (52), the relativistic Langevin equation
1246
+ (57) can also be nondimensionalized, when we define
1247
+ ˜p = pc/(kBT),
1248
+ ˜m0 = m0c2/(kBT), ˜t = t/τ, and
1249
+ ˜ξ = ξτc/(kBT). We have then
1250
+ d˜p
1251
+ d˜t = −
1252
+ � ˜t
1253
+ 0
1254
+ d˜t′ ˜Γ(˜t − ˜t′)
1255
+ ˜p(˜t′)
1256
+
1257
+ ˜p2 + ˜m2
1258
+ 0
1259
+ + ˜ξ(˜t) ,
1260
+ (61)
1261
+ where
1262
+ ˜Γ(˜t − ˜t′) = τ 2c2
1263
+ kBT Γ(t − t′)
1264
+ (62)
1265
+ and
1266
+ < ˜ξi(˜t)˜ξj(˜t′) >= δij ˜Γ(˜t − ˜t′) .
1267
+ (63)
1268
+ τ is the decay time scale in the given memory kernels.
1269
+ Looking at the memory kernels Γ1, Γ2, and Γ3 in Eqs.
1270
+ (23), (27), and (33), we find that ˜m0 and γτc2/(kBT) are
1271
+ the free parameters in Eq. (61). Note that ωτ in Γ3 is
1272
+ not an additional parameter, since ωτ (or W) is fixed by
1273
+ γτ/m0 in Eq. (40), where we replace m by m0. We also
1274
+ realize that τ does not exist in the Langevin equation
1275
+ with the white noise, Eq. (58). In this case we define
1276
+ τ = kBT/(γc2).
1277
+ Figure 8 shows the time evolution of the average ki-
1278
+ netic energy of the relativistic Brownian particle, Ek =
1279
+ E − m0c2 scaled by kBT, under the colored noise with
1280
+ Γ1. The initial momentum of the Brownian particle is
1281
+ zero.
1282
+ The parameter γτc2/(kBT) is set to be 6.
1283
+ For
1284
+ τ = 1 fm/c and T = 300 MeV, γ/2 is consistent with the
1285
+ drag coefficient in the Brownian motion of charm quarks
1286
+ in the quark-gluon plasma created in relativistic heavy-
1287
+ ion collisions [14, 19, 24, 38–45]. We vary the rest mass
1288
+ of the Brownian particle to see the relativistic effect and
1289
+ to check the numerical calculations.
1290
+ We see that in the long time limit, the average kinetic
1291
+ energy increases from the non-relativistic limit, 3kBT/2,
1292
+ to the ultra-relativistic limit, 3kBT. All the final values
1293
+ with different masses agree with those according to the
1294
+ equipartition theorem, which indicates that the Brown-
1295
+ ian particle under the colored noise with Γ1 reaches the
1296
+ thermal equilibrium with its surrounding matter. The
1297
+ numerical result of the relativistic Langevin equation
1298
+
1299
+ 10
1300
+ FIG. 8: The time evolution of the average kinetic energy of
1301
+ the relativistic Brownian particle under the colored noise with
1302
+ Γ1 and with various rest masses. The initial momentum of
1303
+ the particle is set to be zero.
1304
+ with a large mass ˜m0 = 40 is compared with the an-
1305
+ alytical one of non-relativistic Langevin equation. The
1306
+ perfect agreement demonstrates the solid numerical cal-
1307
+ culations.
1308
+ The time evolution of the average kinetic energy of
1309
+ the relativistic Brownian particle with the mass ˜m0 =
1310
+ 1.4 under the white noise and the colored noise with the
1311
+ memory kernels Γ1, Γ2, and Γ3 are depicted in Fig. 9.
1312
+ The initial momentum is zero. The curve of Γ1 is the
1313
+ same as that in Fig. 8. For Γ3 with W = 2 we obtain
1314
+ γτ/m0 = 13.8 according to Eq. (40) by replacing m by
1315
+ m0. Thus, we have γτc2/(kBT) = 19.3 for ˜m0 = 1.4.
1316
+ FIG. 9: Same as Fig. 8 but under the white noise and the
1317
+ colored noise with various memory kernels.
1318
+ From Fig. 9 we see that the average kinetic energy of
1319
+ the Brownian particle under the white noise and the col-
1320
+ ored noise with Γ1 and Γ3 approaches to the same value
1321
+ in the long time limit, which is the value according to
1322
+ the equipartition theorem. The oscillating behavior in
1323
+ the non-relativistic limit with Γ3 does not occur here.
1324
+ Remind that Eq. (40) is a strict condition for the oscil-
1325
+ lating behavior in the non-relativistic case, which is not
1326
+ necessarily the same one met in the relativistic case.
1327
+ The long time limit of the average kinetic energy of
1328
+ the Brownian particle with Γ2 is smaller than that with
1329
+ other memory kernels. The anomalous behavior already
1330
+ seen in the non-relativistic case appears in the relativistic
1331
+ case too. We want to know whether we can make use
1332
+ of the formulas derived in the non-relativistic limit in
1333
+ the previous section to analyze the results achieved in
1334
+ the relativistic case. From Eq. (18) we get the average
1335
+ kinetic energy in the long time limit,
1336
+ < Ek > |t→∞
1337
+ kBT
1338
+ = < Ek > |t=0
1339
+ kBT
1340
+ 1
1341
+ (1 + C)2
1342
+ +3
1343
+ 2
1344
+
1345
+ 1 −
1346
+ 1
1347
+ (1 + C)2
1348
+
1349
+ ,
1350
+ (64)
1351
+ where Ek = p2/(2m) and C = γτ/(4m). We use this
1352
+ formula and replace m by m0. For p0 = 0, γτc2/(kBT) =
1353
+ 6, and ˜m0 = 1.4 we obtain < Ek > |t→∞/(kBT) = 1.15,
1354
+ which agrees with the numerical result seen in Fig. 9.
1355
+ The memory effect of the initial momentum is shown
1356
+ in Fig.
1357
+ 10.
1358
+ In these calculations the initial momen-
1359
+ tum is set to be p0c/(kBT) = 2.
1360
+ By comparing with
1361
+ Fig. 9 we see that while the long time limit of the av-
1362
+ erage kinetic energy of the relativistic Brownian parti-
1363
+ cle under the white noise and the colored noise with Γ1
1364
+ and Γ3 do not show any dependence of the initial mo-
1365
+ mentum, it does appear for the particle with Γ2. Using
1366
+ FIG. 10: Same as Fig. 9, but the initial momentum of the
1367
+ particle is set to be p0c/(kBT) = 2.
1368
+
1369
+ white noise
1370
+ YTc2
1371
+ 3
1372
+ kB T
1373
+ YTc2
1374
+ YTc2
1375
+ 19.3
1376
+ =6
1377
+ kB T
1378
+ kB T
1379
+ T
1380
+ /kB
1381
+ Λ
1382
+ po c
1383
+ mo
1384
+ .4
1385
+ kB
1386
+ 0
1387
+ 5
1388
+ 10
1389
+ 15
1390
+ 20
1391
+ 25
1392
+ 30
1393
+ t/Tmo
1394
+ mo C
1395
+ :0
1396
+ :40
1397
+ kB T
1398
+ mo
1399
+ 1.4
1400
+ non-relativistic limit
1401
+ kB T
1402
+ 3
1403
+ T
1404
+ kB
1405
+ 2
1406
+ V
1407
+ po c
1408
+ 0
1409
+ 0
1410
+ 5
1411
+ 10
1412
+ 15
1413
+ 20
1414
+ 25
1415
+ 30
1416
+ t/Twhite noise
1417
+ 12.
1418
+ YTC2
1419
+ 3
1420
+ kB T
1421
+ YTc2
1422
+ YTc2
1423
+ 19.3
1424
+ :6
1425
+ kB T
1426
+ kB T
1427
+ T
1428
+ kB
1429
+ V
1430
+ po c
1431
+ mo
1432
+ 0
1433
+ 1.4
1434
+ kB
1435
+ 0
1436
+ 5
1437
+ 10
1438
+ 15
1439
+ 20
1440
+ 25
1441
+ 30
1442
+ t/T11
1443
+ FIG. 11:
1444
+ The time evolution of the average displacement
1445
+ squared of the relativistic Brownian particle under the white
1446
+ noise and the colored noise with various memory kernels. The
1447
+ initial momentum of the particle is set to be p0 = 0.
1448
+ the formula in the non-relativistic limit (64), we obtain
1449
+ < Ek > |t→∞/(kBT) = 1.48 for p0c/(kBT) = 2, which
1450
+ also agrees with the numerical result seen in Fig. 10.
1451
+ We depict the time evolution of the average displace-
1452
+ ment squared, scaled by τ 2c2, in Fig. 11. The behaviors
1453
+ of the diffusion are the same as in the non-relativistic
1454
+ limit. The particle diffusion under the white noise and
1455
+ the colored noise with Γ1 and Γ3 are normal, while it
1456
+ is ballistic for the particle with Γ2.
1457
+ Using the formu-
1458
+ las in the non-relativistic limit Eqs.
1459
+ (45) - (48) times
1460
+ kBT/(m0c2),
1461
+ < (∆x)2 > |wn
1462
+ τ 2c2
1463
+ → 6 kBT
1464
+ m0c2
1465
+ t
1466
+ τ ,
1467
+ (65)
1468
+ < (∆x)2 > |Γ1,Γ3
1469
+ τ 2c2
1470
+ → 12 kBT
1471
+ γτc2
1472
+ t
1473
+ τ ,
1474
+ (66)
1475
+ < (∆x)2 > |Γ2
1476
+ τ 2c2
1477
+ → kBT
1478
+ m0c2
1479
+ p2
1480
+ 0/(m0kBT) + 3C
1481
+ (1 + C)2
1482
+ � t
1483
+ τ
1484
+ �2
1485
+ ,
1486
+ (67)
1487
+ we compare these non-relativistic results with the rela-
1488
+ tivistic ones. We find perfect agreements for the colored
1489
+ noise with Γ1 and Γ3, an approximate agreement for the
1490
+ white noise, and a difference of almost a factor of 2 for
1491
+ the colored noise with Γ2.
1492
+ Finally we calculate the auto-correlation function of
1493
+ momentum at different times, in order to study the va-
1494
+ lidity of the ergodicity in the motion of relativistic Brow-
1495
+ nian particles. Figure 12 shows the numerical results at
1496
+ a fixed large t′/τ = 20.
1497
+ The momentum is scaled by
1498
+ kBT/c. We clearly see that Cp with Γ2 is non-zero in the
1499
+ long time limit, while the other two correlations with Γ1
1500
+ and Γ3 approach to zero. Therefore, the motion with Γ2
1501
+ breaks the validity of the ergodicity. The motions with
1502
+ Γ1 and Γ3 hold the ergodicity, since Wp, i.e., the integral
1503
+ FIG. 12: The auto-correlation function of momentum of the
1504
+ relativistic Brownian particle under the colored noise with Γ1,
1505
+ Γ2, and Γ3.
1506
+ of Cp, in the two cases are obviously finite and non-zero.
1507
+ IV.
1508
+ SUMMARY
1509
+ In this paper we solved analytically the generalized
1510
+ Langevin equation of non-relativistic Brownian particles
1511
+ with the memory kernel and colored noise by employing
1512
+ the Laplace transformation technique. According to the
1513
+ position of the poles of the response function G(s), the
1514
+ memory kernels are classified to three categories, which
1515
+ result in different behaviors of the thermal equilibrium,
1516
+ the memory effect, the particle diffusion, and the ergod-
1517
+ icity.
1518
+ Specifically, the first category includes the cases
1519
+ that all the poles of G(s) are located in the left half of
1520
+ the complex plane but not on the imaginary axis. In the
1521
+ long time limit, the Brownian particle approaches to the
1522
+ thermal equilibrium with the surrounding matter, has no
1523
+ memory of the initial state, and diffuses normally. The
1524
+ ergodicity holds. The second category includes the cases
1525
+ that one pole is located on the imaginal axis and specially
1526
+ at the origin s = 0 and the other poles are located in the
1527
+ left half of the complex plane.
1528
+ Usually, the Brownian
1529
+ particle cannot reach the equilibrium with the surround-
1530
+ ing matter, but will reach an equilibrium with a different
1531
+ “temperature” rather than that of the surrounding mat-
1532
+ ter. This “temperature” as well as the average kinetic en-
1533
+ ergy of the Brownian particle depend on its initial state,
1534
+ which shows the memory effect. The particle diffusion is
1535
+ ballistic and the ergodicity is broken. The third and last
1536
+ category includes the cases that some poles in pairs are
1537
+ located on the imaginal axis but not at the origin and
1538
+ the other poles are located in the left half of the complex
1539
+ plane. The Brownian particle approaches to and departs
1540
+ from the thermal equilibrium with the surrounding mat-
1541
+
1542
+ 500
1543
+ white noise
1544
+ YTc2
1545
+ :6
1546
+ 400
1547
+ kB
1548
+ YTc2
1549
+ =6
1550
+ kB T
1551
+ YTc2
1552
+ 300
1553
+ 19.3
1554
+ kB
1555
+ od
1556
+ mo (
1557
+ V
1558
+ 0
1559
+ 1.4
1560
+ KR
1561
+ △x
1562
+ 200
1563
+ V
1564
+ 100
1565
+ 10
1566
+ 20
1567
+ 30
1568
+ 40
1569
+ 0
1570
+ 50
1571
+ 60
1572
+ t/T15
1573
+ YTc2
1574
+ :6
1575
+ kB T
1576
+ :6
1577
+ 10
1578
+ kB T
1579
+ YTC
1580
+ 19.3
1581
+ kB T
1582
+ Cp(t/T, t'/t)
1583
+ po c
1584
+ mo
1585
+ :1.4, t/t=20
1586
+ 5
1587
+ kB T
1588
+ kB T
1589
+ 20
1590
+ 30
1591
+ 40
1592
+ 50
1593
+ 60
1594
+ t / T12
1595
+ ter periodically. The amplitude of the oscillation in the
1596
+ average kinetic energy depends on the initial state, which
1597
+ is again the memory effect. The diffusion of the Brownian
1598
+ particle is normal, but the ergodicity is broken.
1599
+ For relativistic Brownian particles, the Langevin equa-
1600
+ tion cannot be solved analytically because of the non-
1601
+ linearity.
1602
+ Therefore, we do not have the general con-
1603
+ clusion about the behavior of the thermal equilibrium,
1604
+ memory effects, the diffusion and the ergodicity for any
1605
+ given memory kernel. On the other hand, we solved the
1606
+ relativistic Langevin equation numerically for three typ-
1607
+ ical memory kernels chosen as the examples in the non-
1608
+ relativistic case. Similar results as obtained in the non-
1609
+ relativistic case for the first and second category of mem-
1610
+ ory kernels are also seen in the relativistic case. In other
1611
+ words, there are indeed memory kernels, with which the
1612
+ relativistic Brownian particle cannot reach the thermal
1613
+ equilibrium, has memory effects of the initial state, and
1614
+ diffuses anomalously.
1615
+ Its motion breaks the ergodicty.
1616
+ Moreover, by regarding the relativistic particle as the
1617
+ non-relativistic one (by replacing the mass by the rest
1618
+ mass), the average kinetic energy and the average dis-
1619
+ placement squared (except for one case with Γ2) can
1620
+ be well described by the formulas derived in the non-
1621
+ relativistic case.
1622
+ Anomalous behaviors in Brownian motions may chal-
1623
+ lenge the probe of an unknown matter by using a Brow-
1624
+ nian particle. On the other hand, our present investiga-
1625
+ tion may give rise to think about the memory effect and
1626
+ anomalous diffusion of heavy quarks in the quark-gluon
1627
+ plasma created in relativistic heavy-ion collisions.
1628
+ Acknowledgments
1629
+ This work was financially supported by the National
1630
+ Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants No.
1631
+ 11890710, No. 11890712, and No. 12035006. C.G. ac-
1632
+ knowledges support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemein-
1633
+ schaft (DFG) through the grant CRC-TR 211 “Strong-
1634
+ interaction matter under extreme conditions.”
1635
+ Appendix A: Laplace transformation
1636
+ The Laplace transform of a function f(t) is defined as
1637
+ L[f(t)] =
1638
+ � t
1639
+ 0
1640
+ dtf(t)e−st ≡ f(s) ,
1641
+ (A1)
1642
+ where s is a complex variable. The inverse transform is
1643
+ L−1[f(s)] =
1644
+ � β+i∞
1645
+ β−i∞
1646
+ dsf(s)est .
1647
+ (A2)
1648
+ Some useful properties of the Laplace transformation are
1649
+ listed below:
1650
+ L
1651
+ �df(t)
1652
+ dt
1653
+
1654
+ = sf(s) − f(t = 0) ,
1655
+ (A3)
1656
+ L
1657
+ �� t
1658
+ 0
1659
+ dt′f(t − t′)g(t′)
1660
+
1661
+ = f(s)g(s) ,
1662
+ (A4)
1663
+ L
1664
+ �d2f(t)
1665
+ dt2
1666
+
1667
+ = s2f(s) − sf(t = 0) − df(t)
1668
+ dt (t = 0) .
1669
+ (A5)
1670
+ We now derive Eq. (18) from Eq. (17)
1671
+ < v2 > (t) = v2(0)G2(t) + 3kBT
1672
+ m2
1673
+ � t
1674
+ 0
1675
+ dt′G(t − t′) ×
1676
+ ×
1677
+ � t
1678
+ 0
1679
+ dt′′G(t − t′′)Γ(t′′ − t′) .
1680
+ Because the integrals for t′′ ≥ t′ and t′′ ≤ t′ are same, we
1681
+ rewrite the above equation to
1682
+ < v2 > (t) = v2(0)G2(t) + 3kBT
1683
+ m2 2
1684
+ � t
1685
+ 0
1686
+ dt′G(t − t′) ×
1687
+ ×
1688
+ � t
1689
+ 0
1690
+ dt′′G(t − t′′)Γ(t′′ − t′)θ(t′′ − t′) .
1691
+ (A6)
1692
+ By τ = t′′ − t′, we have
1693
+ � t
1694
+ 0
1695
+ dt′′G(t − t′′)Γ(t′′ − t′)θ(t′′ − t′)
1696
+ =
1697
+ � t−t′
1698
+ −t′
1699
+ dτG(t − t′ − τ)Γ(τ)θ(τ)
1700
+ =
1701
+ � t−t′
1702
+ 0
1703
+ dτG(t − t′ − τ)Γ(τ)
1704
+ = L−1
1705
+
1706
+ L
1707
+ �� t−t′
1708
+ 0
1709
+ dτG(t − t′ − τ)Γ(τ)
1710
+ ��
1711
+ = L−1 [G(s)Γ(s)] .
1712
+ Since G(s) = 1/[s + Γ(s)/m] and G(t = 0) = 1, we get
1713
+ G(s)Γ(s) = m[sG(s) − G(t = 0)] = mL
1714
+ �dG(t − t′)
1715
+ d(t − t′)
1716
+
1717
+ and
1718
+ L−1 [G(s)Γ(s)] = mdG(t − t′)
1719
+ d(t − t′) = −mdG(t − t′)
1720
+ dt′
1721
+ .
1722
+ Putting this in Eq. (A6) we obtain finally
1723
+ < v2 > (t) = v2(0)G2(t) − 3kBT
1724
+ m
1725
+ 2
1726
+ � t
1727
+ 0
1728
+ dt′G(t − t′)dG(t − t′)
1729
+ dt′
1730
+ = v2(0)G2(t) + 3kBT
1731
+ m
1732
+
1733
+ 1 − G2(t)
1734
+
1735
+ .
1736
+
1737
+ 13
1738
+ [1] Z.-W. Bai, J.-D. Bao, and Y.-L. Song, Phys. Rev. E
1739
+ 72, 061105 (2005), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/
1740
+ 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.061105.
1741
+ [2] J.-D. Bao, Y.-L. Song, Q. Ji, and Y.-Z. Zhuo, Phys. Rev.
1742
+ E 72, 011113 (2005), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/
1743
+ 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.011113.
1744
+ [3] R. M. S. Ferreira, M. V. S. Santos, C. C. Donato,
1745
+ J. S. Andrade, and F. A. Oliveira, Phys. Rev. E 86,
1746
+ 021121 (2012), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.
1747
+ 1103/PhysRevE.86.021121.
1748
+ [4] M.
1749
+ Magdziarz
1750
+ and
1751
+ A.
1752
+ Weron,
1753
+ Phys.
1754
+ Rev.
1755
+ E
1756
+ 84,
1757
+ 051138 (2011), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.
1758
+ 1103/PhysRevE.84.051138.
1759
+ [5] J.-D. Bao, Y.-Z. Zhuo, F. A. Oliveira, and P. H¨anggi,
1760
+ arXiv
1761
+ e-prints
1762
+ cond-mat/0605093
1763
+ (2006),
1764
+ cond-
1765
+ mat/0605093.
1766
+ [6] P. Siegle, I. Goychuk, and P. H¨anggi, Phys. Rev. Lett.
1767
+ 105, 100602 (2010), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/
1768
+ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.100602.
1769
+ [7] J.-D. Bao, Y. Zhou, and K. L¨u, Phys. Rev. E 74,
1770
+ 041125 (2006), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.
1771
+ 1103/PhysRevE.74.041125.
1772
+ [8] L. C. Lapas, R. Morgado, M. H. Vainstein, J. M.
1773
+ Rub´ı,
1774
+ and F. A. Oliveira,
1775
+ Phys. Rev. Lett. 101,
1776
+ 230602 (2008), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.
1777
+ 1103/PhysRevLett.101.230602.
1778
+ [9] J.-D. Bao, P. H¨anggi, and Y.-Z. Zhuo, Phys. Rev. E
1779
+ 72, 061107 (2005), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/
1780
+ 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.061107.
1781
+ [10] M. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 190601 (2007), URL
1782
+ https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.
1783
+ 190601.
1784
+ [11] S. Li, W. Xiong, and R. Wan, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1113
1785
+ (2020), 2012.02489.
1786
+ [12] J.-H. Liu, S. K. Das, V. Greco, and M. Ruggieri, Phys.
1787
+ Rev. D 103, 034029 (2021), 2011.05818.
1788
+ [13] M. Ruggieri, Pooja, J. Prakash, and S. K. Das, Phys.
1789
+ Rev. D 106, 034032 (2022), 2203.06712.
1790
+ [14] G. D. Moore and D. Teaney, Phys. Rev. C 71, 064904
1791
+ (2005), hep-ph/0412346.
1792
+ [15] S. Li and J. Liao, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 671 (2020),
1793
+ 1912.08965.
1794
+ [16] Y. Akamatsu, T. Hatsuda, and T. Hirano, Phys. Rev.
1795
+ C 79, 054907 (2009), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/
1796
+ 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.054907.
1797
+ [17] S. K. Das, F. Scardina, S. Plumari, and V. Greco, Phys.
1798
+ Lett. B 747, 260 (2015), 1502.03757.
1799
+ [18] Y. Sun, G. Coci, S. K. Das, S. Plumari, M. Ruggieri, and
1800
+ V. Greco, Phys. Lett. B 798, 134933 (2019), 1902.06254.
1801
+ [19] X. Dong and V. Greco, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 104, 97
1802
+ (2019).
1803
+ [20] S. Cao, G.-Y. Qin, and S. A. Bass, Phys. Rev. C 88,
1804
+ 044907 (2013), 1308.0617.
1805
+ [21] S. Cao, G.-Y. Qin, and S. A. Bass, Nucl. Phys. A 931,
1806
+ 569 (2014), 1408.0503.
1807
+ [22] S. Cao, G.-Y. Qin, and S. A. Bass, Phys. Rev. C 92,
1808
+ 024907 (2015), 1505.01413.
1809
+ [23] S. K. Das, F. Scardina, S. Plumari, and V. Greco, Phys.
1810
+ Rev. C 90, 044901 (2014), 1312.6857.
1811
+ [24] H. van Hees, V. Greco, and R. Rapp, Phys. Rev. C 73,
1812
+ 034913 (2006), nucl-th/0508055.
1813
+ [25] R. Kubo, Reports on Progress in Physics 29, 255 (1966),
1814
+ URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/29/1/306.
1815
+ [26] C. Greiner and S. Leupold, Annals Phys. 270, 328 (1998),
1816
+ hep-ph/9802312.
1817
+ [27] Z. Xu and C. Greiner, Phys. Rev. D 62, 036012 (2000),
1818
+ hep-ph/9910562.
1819
+ [28] B. Sch¨uller,
1820
+ A. Meistrenko,
1821
+ H. Van Hees,
1822
+ Z. Xu,
1823
+ and C. Greiner, Annals Phys. 412, 168045 (2020),
1824
+ 1905.09652.
1825
+ [29] J. Schmidt, A. Meistrenko, H. van Hees, Z. Xu, and
1826
+ C. Greiner, Phys. Rev. E 91, 032125 (2015), 1407.6528.
1827
+ [30] M. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 190601 (2007), URL
1828
+ https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.
1829
+ 190601.
1830
+ [31] F. Debbasch, K. Mallick, and J.-P. Rivet, Journal of Sta-
1831
+ tistical Physics 88, 945 (1997).
1832
+ [32] F. Debbasch and J.-P. Rivet, Journal of Statistical
1833
+ Physics 90, 1179 (1998).
1834
+ [33] C. Chevalier and F. Debbasch, Journal of Mathematical
1835
+ Physics 49, 043303 (2008).
1836
+ [34] J. Dunkel and P. Hanggi, Phys. Rev. E 71, 016124 (2005),
1837
+ cond-mat/0411011.
1838
+ [35] J. Dunkel and P. H¨anggi, Phys. Rept. 471, 1 (2009),
1839
+ 0812.1996.
1840
+ [36] P. S. Pal and S. Deffner,
1841
+ New Journal of Physics
1842
+ 22, 073054 (2020), URL https://doi.org/10.1088%
1843
+ 2F1367-2630%2Fab9ce6.
1844
+ [37] J.
1845
+ Dunkel
1846
+ and
1847
+ P.
1848
+ H¨anggi,
1849
+ Phys.
1850
+ Rev.
1851
+ E
1852
+ 72,
1853
+ 036106 (2005), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.
1854
+ 1103/PhysRevE.72.036106.
1855
+ [38] S. Cao, G.-Y. Qin, and S. A. Bass, Phys. Rev. C 92,
1856
+ 054909 (2015), 1505.01869.
1857
+ [39] Y. Akiba et al. (2015), 1502.02730.
1858
+ [40] A. Adare et al. (PHENIX), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 172301
1859
+ (2007), nucl-ex/0611018.
1860
+ [41] S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg,
1861
+ C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo (Wuppertal-Budapest), JHEP
1862
+ 09, 073 (2010), 1005.3508.
1863
+ [42] S. Acharya et al. (ALICE), Phys. Lett. B 813, 136054
1864
+ (2021), 2005.11131.
1865
+ [43] D. Banerjee, S. Datta, R. Gavai, and P. Majumdar, Phys.
1866
+ Rev. D 85, 014510 (2012), 1109.5738.
1867
+ [44] D. Banerjee, S. Datta, R. Gavai, and P. Majumdar, Phys.
1868
+ Rev. D 85, 014510 (2012), URL https://link.aps.org/
1869
+ doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.014510.
1870
+ [45] H.-T. Ding, A. Francis, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch,
1871
+ H.
1872
+ Satz,
1873
+ and
1874
+ W.
1875
+ Soeldner,
1876
+ Phys.
1877
+ Rev.
1878
+ D
1879
+ 86,
1880
+ 014509 (2012), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.
1881
+ 1103/PhysRevD.86.014509.
1882
+