topicId
int64
441
1.07k
split
stringclasses
1 value
topicText
stringclasses
25 values
topicTarget
stringclasses
25 values
topicSentiment
int64
-1
1
claims.claimId
int64
117k
913k
claims.stance
stringclasses
2 values
claims.claimCorrectedText
stringlengths
21
223
claims.claimOriginalText
stringlengths
14
223
claims.Compatible
stringclasses
2 values
claims.claimTarget.text
stringlengths
2
152
claims.claimTarget.span.start
float64
0
135
claims.claimTarget.span.end
float64
2
180
claims.claimSentiment
float64
-1
1
claims.targetsRelation
float64
-1
1
942
train
This house would enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government
enforce term limits on the legislative branch of government
1
520,384
PRO
contact with the affairs of state is one of the most corrupting of the influences to which men are exposed
contact with the affairs of state is one of the most corrupting of the influences to which men are exposed
yes
contact with the affairs of state
0
33
-1
-1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
386,861
PRO
The States' have the authority to promulgate flag desecration laws under their general police power to safeguard public safety and welfare
the States' had the authority to promulgate flag desecration laws under their general police power to safeguard public safety and welfare
yes
flag desecration laws
45
66
1
-1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
386,862
CON
symbolic speech is protected by the First Amendment
symbolic speech" was protected by the First Amendment
yes
symbolic speech
0
15
1
1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
386,863
CON
Flag burning is protected by the First Amendment
flag burning was protected by the First Amendment
yes
Flag burning
0
12
1
1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
386,864
CON
protest involving the physical use of the flag should be seen as a form of protected expression under the First Amendment
protest involving the physical use of the flag should be seen as a form of protected expression under the First Amendment
yes
protest involving the physical use of the flag
0
46
1
1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
386,865
CON
Burning the flag is a form of symbolic speech subject to protection under the First Amendment
burning the flag was a form of symbolic speech subject to protection under the First Amendment
yes
Burning the flag
0
16
1
1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
386,875
CON
Symbolic speech is recognized as being protected under the First Amendment as a form of speech
Symbolic speech is recognized as being protected under the First Amendment as a form of speech
yes
Symbolic speech
0
15
1
1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
386,882
CON
there is a constitutional right to make one's speech as effective as possible
there is a constitutional right to make one's speech as effective as possible
yes
to make one's speech as effective as possible
32
77
1
1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
386,883
CON
Flag burning is a form of free speech
flag burning was a form of free speech
yes
Flag burning
0
12
1
1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
523,243
CON
freedom of expression by non-speech means is commonly thought to be protected under the First Amendment
freedom of expression by non-speech means is commonly thought to be protected under the First Amendment
yes
freedom of expression by non-speech means
0
41
1
1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
523,416
PRO
burning the flag is a very offensive gesture that deserves to be formally outlawed
burning the flag is a very offensive gesture that deserves to be formally outlawed
yes
burning the flag
0
16
-1
1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
523,417
CON
Americans oppose amending the constitution to outlaw flag burning
Americans opposed amending the constitution to outlaw flag burning
yes
amending the constitution to outlaw flag burning
17
65
-1
-1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
523,418
CON
Americans oppose a flag desecration amendment
Americans opposed a flag desecration amendment
yes
a flag desecration amendment
17
45
-1
-1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
523,419
PRO
Americans support a flag desecration amendment
Americans supported a flag desecration amendment
yes
a flag desecration amendment
18
46
1
-1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
523,420
CON
Flag burning is constitutionally-protected free speech
flag burning was constitutionally-protected free speech
yes
Flag burning
0
12
1
1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
526,870
CON
Flag burning is protected speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution
flag burning was protected speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution
yes
Flag burning
0
12
1
1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
526,871
CON
the First Amendment protects such activity as symbolic speech
the First Amendment protects such activity as symbolic speech
yes
such activity
29
42
1
1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
526,872
CON
The First Amendment reaches non-speech acts
the First Amendment reached non-speech acts
yes
non-speech acts
28
43
1
1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
526,873
CON
The First Amendment's protection does not end at the spoken or written word
its protection does not end at the spoken or written word
no
null
null
null
null
null
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
526,874
PRO
States have a compelling interest in preserving a venerated national symbol
states had a compelling interest in preserving a venerated national symbol
yes
preserving a venerated national symbol
37
75
1
-1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
526,875
PRO
Flag burning tends to incite breaches of the peace
it "tends to incite" breaches of the peace
yes
Flag burning
0
12
-1
1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
526,876
PRO
States possess an interest in preserving the flag as a unique symbol of national identity and principles
states possessed an interest in preserving the flag as a unique symbol of national identity and principles
yes
preserving the flag as a unique symbol of national identity and principles
30
104
1
-1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
526,877
PRO
Desecration of the flag impugns its value as such a unique national symbol
desecration of the flag impugned its value as such a unique national symbol
yes
Desecration of the flag
0
23
-1
1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
526,878
PRO
the "uniqueness" of the flag "justifies a governmental prohibition against flag burning
the "uniqueness" of the flag "justifies a governmental prohibition against flag burning
yes
a governmental prohibition against flag burning
40
87
1
-1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
526,879
PRO
flag burning is "no essential part of any exposition of ideas
flag burning is "no essential part of any exposition of ideas
yes
flag burning
0
12
-1
1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
526,880
PRO
Flag burning is most likely to be indulged in not to express any particular idea, but to antagonize others
is most likely to be indulged in not to express any particular idea, but to antagonize others
yes
Flag burning
0
12
-1
1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
526,881
PRO
the First Amendment does not guarantee the right to employ every conceivable method of communication at all times and in all places
the First Amendment does not guarantee the right to employ every conceivable method of communication at all times and in all places
yes
the right to employ every conceivable method of communication at all times and in all places
39
131
-1
1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
526,882
PRO
A majority of Americans support a ban on flag-burning
a majority of Americans still support a ban on flag-burning
yes
a ban on flag-burning
32
53
1
-1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
526,922
PRO
the Constitution allows states to prohibit the burning of the flag
the Constitution allows states to prohibit the burning of the flag
yes
to prohibit the burning of the flag
31
66
1
-1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
526,923
PRO
laws against flag-burning are constitutional
laws against flag-burning are constitutional
yes
laws against flag-burning
0
25
1
-1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
526,924
PRO
flag-burning is not constitutionally protected
flag-burning is not constitutionally protected
yes
flag-burning
0
12
-1
1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
526,925
PRO
it would be constitutional to ban flag-burning
it would be constitutional to ban flag-burning
yes
to ban flag-burning
27
46
1
-1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
526,926
PRO
The flag's status as a special emblem of nationality entitles it to additional protections
The flag's status as a special emblem of nationality, however, entitles it to additional protections
yes
it
49
51
1
-1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
526,927
PRO
the state can prohibit the burning of any item in public
the state can prohibit the burning of any item in public
yes
prohibit the burning of any item in public
14
56
1
-1
944
train
This house would prohibit burning the stars and stripes
burning the stars and stripes
-1
526,928
PRO
the nature of the flag entitles it to more protection under the law, rather than less
the nature of the flag entitles it to more protection under the law, rather than less
no
null
null
null
null
null
946
train
This house would implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
1
613,795
PRO
Individuals interested in college football prefer a playoff system to the BCS
individuals interested in college football preferred a playoff system to the BCS
yes
a playoff system
50
66
1
1
946
train
This house would implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
1
614,476
PRO
Often, the BCS system leads to controversies
Often, the BCS system leads to controversies
yes
the BCS system
7
21
-1
-1
946
train
This house would implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
1
614,477
PRO
Controversies concerning inclusion in the BCS National Championship Game are numerous
Controversies concerning inclusion in the BCS National Championship Game are numerous
yes
the BCS National Championship Game
38
72
-1
-1
946
train
This house would implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
1
616,712
PRO
Significant support among college football fans for a playoff to replace the BCS is shown
significant support among college football fans for a playoff to replace the BCS
yes
a playoff to replace the BCS
52
80
1
1
946
train
This house would implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
1
616,713
PRO
the participants of the BCS National Championship game are decided based upon coaches' and media polls rather than via previous, on-field competition
the participants of the BCS National Championship game are decided based upon coaches' and media polls rather than via previous, on-field competition
yes
the participants of the BCS National Championship game
0
54
-1
-1
946
train
This house would implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
1
616,714
CON
a playoff format would detract from the importance of the regular season and the intensity of rivalry games
a playoff format would detract from the importance of the regular season and the intensity of rivalry games
yes
a playoff format
0
16
-1
1
946
train
This house would implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
1
616,715
CON
a playoff system would create conflicts with student-athletes' studies
a playoff system would create conflicts with student-athletes' studies
yes
a playoff system
0
16
-1
1
946
train
This house would implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
1
616,716
PRO
a single loss can potentially end a team's chance at a National Championship or propel some other team into the title game under the current system
a single loss can potentially end a team's chance at a National Championship or propel some other team into the title game under the current system
yes
the current system
129
147
-1
-1
946
train
This house would implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
1
616,717
PRO
Unfair competition is inherent in the structure of the BCS
unfair competition inherent in the structure of the BCS
yes
the structure of the BCS
34
58
-1
-1
946
train
This house would implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
1
628,984
CON
numerous FBS Conferences have expressed their unwillingness to participate in a play-off system
numerous FBS Conferences have expressed their unwillingness to participate in a play-off system
yes
to participate in a play-off system
60
95
-1
1
946
train
This house would implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
1
628,985
PRO
due to the unique and often esoteric nature of the BCS format, there has been controversy as to which two teams should play for the national championship
due to the unique and often esoteric nature of the BCS format, there has been controversy as to which two teams should play for the national championship
yes
the unique and often esoteric nature of the BCS format
7
61
-1
-1
946
train
This house would implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
1
628,987
CON
Implementation of a playoff system would lead to other, more serious consequences
would lead to other, more serious consequences
yes
Implementation of a playoff system
0
34
-1
1
946
train
This house would implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
1
628,988
PRO
a team with similar or better arguments to another team can be left out of the BCS despite beating the other team
a team with similar or better arguments to another team can be left out of the BCS despite beating the other team
yes
the BCS
75
82
-1
-1
946
train
This house would implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
1
628,990
CON
there are several key advantages that the BCS has over a playoff system
there are several key advantages that the BCS has over a playoff system
yes
the BCS
38
45
1
-1
946
train
This house would implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
implement playoffs in collegiate level American football
1
628,991
PRO
the BCS routinely involves controversy about which two teams are the best in the nation
the BCS routinely involves controversy about which two teams are the best in the nation
yes
the BCS
0
7
-1
-1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
832,890
CON
Markets are regulated to some extent by government in order to correct market failures or to promote social welfare
are regulated to some extent by government in order to correct market failures or to promote social welfare
yes
Markets are regulated to some extent by government
0
50
1
-1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
824,422
CON
intervention is necessary to solve market-created externalities
intervention is necessary to solve market-created externalities
yes
intervention
0
12
1
-1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
832,893
CON
government should intervene to prevent market failure
government should intervene to prevent market failure
yes
intervene to prevent market failure
18
53
1
-1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
498,169
PRO
people should make their own choices with their money
people should make their own choices with their money
yes
make their own choices with their money
14
53
1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
498,172
PRO
the state often serves dominant business interests, distorting the market to their favor and thus leading to inefficient outcomes
the state often serves dominant business interests, distorting the market to their favor and thus leading to inefficient outcomes
yes
the state
0
9
-1
-1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
498,173
CON
Social inequalities result from free-market outcomes
social inequalities that result from free-market outcomes
yes
free-market outcomes
32
52
-1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
498,174
PRO
if everyone is left to their own economic devices instead of being controlled by the state, then the result would be a harmonious and more equal society
if everyone is left to their own economic devices instead of being controlled by the state, then the result would be a harmonious and more equal society
yes
if everyone is left to their own economic devices instead of being controlled by the state
0
90
1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
498,176
PRO
Allowing individuals to act without any restrictions will produce the best results
allowing them to act without any restrictions will produce the best results
yes
Allowing individuals to act without any restrictions
0
52
1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
498,177
CON
the state has a legitimate role in providing public goods
the state has a legitimate role in providing public goods
yes
the state
0
9
1
-1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
822,792
PRO
the state and economy are inherently separate from each other
the state and economy are inherently separate from each other
no
null
null
null
null
null
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
822,794
CON
the free market can damage national traditions
the free market can damage national traditions
yes
the free market
0
15
-1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
822,795
PRO
Government intervention is seen as harmful
government intervention as harmful
yes
Government intervention
0
23
-1
-1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
822,796
PRO
Financial liberalization and privatization coincide with democratization
financial liberalization and privatization coincided with democratization
yes
Financial liberalization and privatization
0
42
1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
860,304
PRO
private market factors can more efficiently deliver many goods or service than governments due to free market competition
private market factors can more efficiently deliver many goods or service than governments due to free market competition
yes
private market factors
0
22
1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
860,305
CON
A private company will serve the needs of those who are most willing (and able) to pay, as opposed to the needs of the majority
A private company will serve the needs of those who are most willing (and able) to pay, as opposed to the needs of the majority
yes
A private company
0
17
-1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
874,791
CON
wages are naturally driven down in free market systems
wages are naturally driven down in free market systems
yes
free market systems
35
54
-1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
874,792
CON
there is an inherent tendency toward oligolopolistic structures when laissez-faire is combined with capitalist private property
there is an inherent tendency toward oligolopolistic structures when laissez-faire is combined with capitalist private property
yes
when laissez-faire is combined with capitalist private property
64
127
-1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
874,793
CON
the allocation of goods and services by a market is not efficient
the allocation of goods and services by a market is not efficient
yes
the allocation of goods and services by a market
0
48
-1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
874,795
CON
the lack of perfect information and perfect competition in a free market is grounds for government intervention
the lack of perfect information and perfect competition in a free market is grounds for government intervention
yes
government intervention
88
111
1
-1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
874,797
CON
free markets usually fail to deal with the problem of externalities
free markets usually fail to deal with the problem of externalities
yes
free markets
0
12
-1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
874,799
CON
the free market is not necessarily free, but weighted towards those who already own property
the free market is not necessarily free, but weighted towards those who already own property
yes
the free market
0
15
-1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
874,805
PRO
corrective measures) reduce the overall efficiency of the market economy
corrective measures) reduce the overall efficiency of the market economy
yes
corrective measures
0
19
-1
-1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
874,806
PRO
corrective policies limit the incentive system of the market
corrective policies limit the incentive system of the market
yes
corrective policies
0
19
-1
-1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
874,807
CON
grave imbalances are produced when economic action, conceived merely as an engine for wealth creation, is detached from political action
grave imbalances are produced when economic action, conceived merely as an engine for wealth creation, is detached from political action
yes
when economic action, conceived merely as an engine for wealth creation, is detached from political action
30
136
-1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
824,400
PRO
The freer the market, the more prices will reflect consumer habits and demands
The freer the market, the more prices will reflect consumer habits and demands
yes
The freer the market
0
20
1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
824,402
PRO
Through free competition between vendors for the provision of products and services, prices tend to decrease, and quality tends to increase
Through free competition between vendors for the provision of products and services, prices tend to decrease, and quality tends to increase
yes
free competition between vendors for the provision of products and services
8
83
1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
824,404
PRO
market economies allow spontaneous order; that is, "a more efficient allocation of societal resources than any design could achieve
market economies allow spontaneous order; that is, "a more efficient allocation of societal resources than any design could achieve
yes
market economies
0
16
1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
824,407
PRO
any attempt to implement central planning will result in more disorder, or a less efficient production and distribution of goods and services
any attempt to implement central planning will result in more disorder, or a less efficient production and distribution of goods and services
yes
any attempt to implement central planning
0
41
-1
-1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
824,408
PRO
there is a direct relationship between economic growth and economic freedom
there is a direct relationship between economic growth and economic freedom
yes
economic freedom
59
75
1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
824,415
CON
government at times has to intervene to ensure competition in large and important industries
government at times has to intervene to ensure competition in large and important industries
yes
to intervene to ensure competition in large and important industries
24
92
1
-1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
824,417
PRO
only a free market can create healthy competition and therefore more business
only a free market can create healthy competition and therefore more business
yes
a free market
5
18
1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
824,419
CON
The unregulated market is seen as an impractical ideal
the unregulated market as an impractical ideal
yes
The unregulated market
0
22
-1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
824,421
CON
free market relationships are considered as structured upon coercion
free market relationships are considered as structured upon coercion
yes
free market relationships
0
25
-1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
824,423
PRO
The free market is believed to self-regulate in the most efficient and just way
The free market is believed to self-regulate in the most efficient and just way
yes
The free market
0
15
1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
499,330
CON
virtually all developed countries today successfully promoted their national industries through protectionism
virtually all developed countries today successfully promoted their national industries through protectionism
yes
protectionism
96
109
1
-1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
499,331
CON
there is a legitimate need for government restrictions on free trade
there is a legitimate need for government restrictions on free trade
yes
government restrictions on free trade
31
68
1
-1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
499,333
CON
laissez-faire capitalism creates social evils that harm its citizens
laissez-faire capitalism creates social evils that harm its citizens
yes
laissez-faire capitalism
0
24
-1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
499,334
PRO
the gains from free trade outweigh any losses
the gains from free trade outweigh any losses
yes
free trade
15
25
1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
499,335
PRO
the benefits of free trade outweigh the losses
the benefits of free trade outweigh the losses
yes
free trade
16
26
1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
499,336
CON
most of the world's major economies are resorting to protectionist measures as the global economic slowdown begins to bite
most of the world's major economies are resorting to protectionist measures as the global economic slowdown begins to bite
yes
protectionist measures
53
75
1
-1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
832,245
PRO
by trying to maximize their own gains in a free market, individual ambition benefits society
by trying to maximize their own gains in a free market, individual ambition benefits society
yes
individual ambition
56
75
1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
832,247
PRO
it is competition between buyers and sellers that channels the profit motive of individuals on both sides of the transaction such that improved products are produced and at lower costs
it is competition between buyers and sellers that channels the profit motive of individuals on both sides of the transaction such that improved products are produced and at lower costs
yes
competition between buyers and sellers
6
44
1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
832,248
PRO
individual self-interest operating in a competitive market place produces the unique conditions under which a society’s total utility is maximized
individual self-interest operating in a competitive market place produces the unique conditions under which a society’s total utility is maximized
yes
individual self-interest operating in a competitive market place
0
64
1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
832,249
CON
free markets, by themselves, often do not lead to what is best
free markets, by themselves, often do not lead to what is best
yes
free markets, by themselves
0
27
-1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
832,250
CON
some regulation is required to make markets work
some regulation is required to make markets work
yes
some regulation
0
15
1
-1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
832,251
PRO
competitive markets do a good job allocating resources
competitive markets do a good job allocating resources
yes
competitive markets
0
19
1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
824,181
PRO
free trade will make society more prosperous
free trade will make society more prosperous
yes
free trade
0
10
1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
824,182
PRO
free trade increases the global level of output
free trade increases the global level of output
yes
free trade
0
10
1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
824,183
PRO
the absolute quantity of goods and services produced is highest under free trade
the absolute quantity of goods and services produced is highest under free trade
yes
free trade
70
80
1
1
985
train
This house would unleash the free market
unleash the free market
1
824,184
PRO
Laissez-faire economic politics and parties permit faster growth
laissez-faire economic politics and parties, which permit faster growth
yes
Laissez-faire economic politics and parties
0
43
1
1