text
stringlengths 40
160k
| label
stringclasses 8
values |
|---|---|
Omar Jamal Al-Omar: I got fed up with looking at the references; as the identical titles suggest all thosse I looked at were mirrors of the same content. Which is spam flavoured, and is not about the subject of this article. TheLongTone ( talk ) 14:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions . Coco bb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs ) 14:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi TheLongTone, thanks for raising this. You're right that press releases often share similar titles, and that can be frustrating when searching for references. However, in this case, the references we have come from credible sources. For instance, the OJO Group website lists Omar Jamal Al-Omar as their Chairman and details his role within the company. URL: https://ojogroup.net/chairman-message . Additionally, the University of Notre Dame's Kroc Institute website showcases Omar's work as their Program Coordinator for the Peace Accords Matrix. While the titles might be similar, the content itself should provide distinct information about Omar's accomplishments and experience. If you'd like some help evaluating the references or finding additional ones, feel free to ask! We can work together to ensure this Wikipedia article is well-sourced and informative. Khushboojain191 ( talk ) 15:00, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kuwait-related deletion discussions . – dudhhr talk contribs she her 15:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . There are no sources present which can be considered reliable, third-party sources to support notability, because literally every source here is a press release. Although some of the venues that opted to publish these press releases may produce their own content and have that content deemed reliable, press releases never establish notability . Lubal ( talk ) 17:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete under WP:A7 and WP:G11 . No independent refs and horrifically promotional. Best, GPL93 ( talk ) 19:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. | speedy delete |
Jayden Jordan: Thriftycat Talk • Contribs 00:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Music . Thriftycat Talk • Contribs 00:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , this iteration of the article only narrowly escapes another A7 speedy with the "famous album" claim. Unsourced autobiography. WindTempos ( talk • contribs ) 00:39, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and given the previous history (their last speedy was not even an hour ago), I'm not giving any benefit of doubt. Not sure if it even escapes A7 given the "credible" part of "credible claim". Chaotıċ Enby ( talk · contribs ) 00:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Perhaps my interpretation of "credible" is overly generous. Anyway, it looks like we're done here for now. WindTempos ( talk • contribs ) 00:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails ANYBIO, no sign of meeting any criteria of MUSICBIO 94rain Talk 00:42, 31 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Ankita Mallick: Macbeejack ☎ 13:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Women , and India . Macbeejack ☎ 13:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:20, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
2024 UK Independence Party leadership election: Fails WP:EVENTCRIT and WP:GNG . This is a very minor party with no elected representatives and only a couple of thousand members. AusLondonder ( talk ) 15:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Politics , and United Kingdom . AusLondonder ( talk ) 15:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Wait , leaning on keep . WP:TOOSOON . Give it a bit more time and more sources and we can probably keep it. Duke of New Gwynedd ( talk | contrib. ) 17:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:TOOSOON is an argument for why an article should not exist... AusLondonder ( talk ) 01:02, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , decidedly minor political event. TOOSOON applies to articles and not to nominations that come "too soon". The event is currently covered with two sentences in the UKIP article, and may be expanded to 9-10 sentences there. Geschichte ( talk ) 18:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly non-notable, no reason to warrant its own article, any more than for leadership elections of the continuing SDP . Anything on this page can by covered on the UKIP page. Iveagh Gardens ( talk ) 17:14, 29 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Lil Dakes: B. Sources include WP:CIRCULAR , WP:MEDIUM , WP:YOUTUBE , and ones that don't even mention this rapper (or barely). TLA (talk) 16:43, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions . CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions . CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Jamaica-related deletion discussions . CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions . CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:54, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I've requested G5, just to save the busy AfD debating what is now essentially WP:SNOW . -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 20:09, 18 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Bedtime Prompts: Fram ( talk ) 13:38, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Spirituality . Fram ( talk ) 13:38, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This is a genuine publication sold on Amazon. I have Copyright and ISBN number. The product is a finalist for Innovation Awards 2023. Pallaviprasadgv ( talk ) 14:00, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The issue is that there is no critical discussion of the book, published book reviews or articles about the book. Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:02, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for PROMO. No coverage of any kind in RS, barely any hits in Gsearch at all. Non-notable book. Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:01, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] A new product needs time for PR. But it still remains a product, just like books? Pallaviprasadgv ( talk ) 14:13, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . Do we do A7 for books? (guess not) Wikipedia isn't a free place to advertise, please do so elsewhere. Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 14:33, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This is not an advertisement or promotion. This is a real self-help tool. I have complied my 15 years of expertise into a pocket-size power hack. This may not be a book. But it is a publication. Pallaviprasadgv ( talk ) 16:02, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . Blatant self-promotion and the publication is not notable by any stretch of the imagination. Should have been speedied. Deb ( talk ) 16:09, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and include CSD template . This is blatant promotion, and the creator deleted the previous CSD template before it got reviewed. 🌶️ Jala peño 🌶️ Don't click this link ! 16:55, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] P.S. this article got recreated only 13 minutes after it god CSD deleted. I'm definitely reporting the account. 🌶️ Jala peño 🌶️ Don't click this link ! 16:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, I am all for self-help, but it's pushing it too far if you just blatantly advertise your product when it's against the guidelines. 🌶️ Jala peño 🌶️ Don't click this link ! 16:59, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Film/video-based therapy: At a minimum the article needs to be renamed Video therapy , or redirected to Art therapy . But WP:TNT may be preferable given that most of its content is generated by a COI editor (editing under various aliases) and ChatGPT. See related ANI discussion . Abecedare ( talk ) 17:35, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a dumpster fire of WP:MEDRS noncompliance. Self-promoters using ChatGPT to edit Wikipedia should be stymied at every turn, and their "contributions" should be nuked from orbit. XOR'easter ( talk ) 20:13, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I am a university professor who has taught at schools including USC, UCLA, Chapman, Emerson, and Pepperdine here in Los Angeles. I met Dr. Joshua L. Cohen in 2016 and we have worked together in parallel since then. I can attest wholeheartedly that Dr. Cohen is a real person, has written a real academic book, and that his therapy is a real thing. it is not for profit, but for the advancement of science and psychology that Dr. Cohen, and not ChatGPT, wrote his book. I have read it and can say for sure that it is beneficial. It has helped me personally. Film/video-based therapy has helped me in some of my struggles as well. The attacks on this category, this article, and the references to Dr. Cohen are unfortunate, untrue and misguided. Those attackers are better served to find actual fraud and misconduct. They can rest knowing that Dr. Cohen is a validated man of science who promotes a good and verified cause. Frankchindamo ( talk ) 23:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC) — Frankchindamo ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:52, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete for the rampant WP:MEDRS failures and the fact that the editor who posted it was unaware of just how oddly it read. This is quite obviously written by a nonhuman. — Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 22:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I am a university professor who has taught at schools including USC, UCLA, Chapman, Emerson, and Pepperdine here in Los Angeles. I met Dr. Joshua L. Cohen in 2016 and we have worked together in parallel since then. I can attest wholeheartedly that Dr. Cohen is a real person, has written a real academic book, and that his therapy is a real thing. it is not for profit, but for the advancement of science and psychology that Dr. Cohen, and not ChatGPT, wrote his book. I have read it and can say for sure that it is beneficial. It has helped me personally. Film/video-based therapy has helped me in some of my struggles as well. The attacks on this category, this article, and the references to Dr. Cohen are unfortunate, untrue and misguided. Those attackers are better served to find actual fraud and misconduct. They can rest knowing that Dr. Cohen is a validated man of science who promotes a good and verified cause. Frankchindamo ( talk ) 23:25, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Copypasta'ing a wall of text that attacks the people participating in the debate does not help your case a whit, especially as it doesn't address the concerns with the Wikipedia article. We're not debating the doctor, his writings, or his findings; we're debating whether or not the Wikipedia article should be deleted as not compliant with Wikipedia policies. — Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 23:47, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Counting this comment at the Talk page , you've said the same thing three times. Repeating a statement three times does not make it three times as true. In these parts, we consider it good etiquette to make one's case and then let the matter be, only making further replies when necessary to address genuinely new points. XOR'easter ( talk ) 00:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: Honestly, I can't find anything to say more to the point than XOR'easter's words; well phrased. That being said, I need no automated cut-and-paste responses from Frankchindamo , who surely has the skills from his putative university teaching posts to better understand Wikipedia policies and guidelines ... however much his Wikipedia activity is almost exclusively to promote himself. (Which, since Courcelles just indeffed the guy, happily is no longer a worry.) Ravenswing 23:44, 26 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Unreadable gobbledygook, and the author shamelessly using ChatGPT to respond to reasonable criticisms on the talk page is beyond the pale. WeirdNAnnoyed ( talk ) 02:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per all the above, not least of which is the obvious use of LLM to write the article. Beyond My Ken ( talk ) 02:53, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete based on the use of LLM alone, which is basically just the tip of the iceberg. Liliana UwU ( talk / contributions ) 11:33, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . If a human wants to put together a draft that shows this is a notable topic using sources that comply with WP:MEDRS in the future, I wouldn't object. This article is so far from that, however, that deletion is the best path forward. — C.Fred ( talk ) 12:13, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per all the above, topic is not notable. -- Jasulan . T TT me 14:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Balto IV: Wolf Destiny: All sources are either IMDB , or from the director. The only exception is a casting call. I have searched for sources and can only find listings about the original series (this article is about a fan-made film), some other wikis mentioning the project, and some paperback books. - AquilaFasciata ( talk | contribs ) 19:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts , Fictional elements , Science fiction and fantasy , and Film . - AquilaFasciata ( talk | contribs ) 19:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fan-made fanfiction; unless Amblin/Universal has suddenly given the rights to the Balto franchise to some random person to post their sequel on YouTube, this seems fake (the actual trailer is just RenderForest crud). Nate • ( chatter ) 20:20, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , no evidence of notability. The casting call is also from the director, so not independent. Squeakachu ( talk ) 20:36, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:SNOW Speedy Delete I’m having trouble not saying something unnecessarily mean about this, but come on. It’s a fan fiction. For a minor film franchise, which only had one notable sequel. This is practically a WP:HOAX and definitely a case of WP:NOTMADEUP and should have been PRODded or even Speedied. Dronebogus ( talk ) 22:07, 13 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Trust me, I'm being kind when I say "Render Forest crud" and could've gone low. I was ready (and very thankful not to have) to blast whichever editor decided to move this from draftspace...only to find the creator just created it straight off in articlespace (though this mess from the creator got tossed to draftspace). Nate • ( chatter ) 01:29, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Completely non-notable, and probably non-existent, fan film. I suspect a WP:SNOW closure on this one. Rorshacma ( talk ) 02:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Lazzy Jazz: I found no decent sources in my own searches. No evidence of WP:NMUSICIAN either (the article claims that he is signed to Warner Music Group but I can't find evidence of this). Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:55, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and France . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:56, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Michael Eamon Herbst: WP:SIGCOV and WP:NBIO are not met. The only coverage, which deals with the subject as a primary topic, is this interview piece in the regional Wexford People newspaper . And is a form of WP:INTERVIEW which doesn't contributed to notability. The only other independent coverage I can find are trivial passing mentions like this or this court proceeding . The other "references" in the article are not independent and/or do not support the text regardless. In many cases making NO MENTION WHATEVER of the subject. And representing a form of WP:REFBOMBing . These "references" certainly do not support a claim to notability. (Like this page from the Wicklow County Council website - which makes ZERO mention of the subject and cannot POSSIBLY be read as supporting the text it is placed alongside). The BLPSources and Peacock concerns, raised by Liz , were simply ignored and the tags removed. The other issues (PROMO/COI/PAID/etc) are so obvious and galling that I was initially tempted to consider SPEEDY or PROD. However, discussion and clear community consensus is probably required... Guliolopez ( talk ) 17:09, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions . Guliolopez ( talk ) 17:11, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions . Guliolopez ( talk ) 17:12, 18 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment . While the article's creator has (repeatedly) removed the related AfD tag before this discussion was closed, these changes have been reverted/corrected by a bot . If the creating editor, Michael Eamon Herbst , believes that the article meets the applicable criteria (and should be retained), then their contributions are welcome here. In the discussion. Removing the link to the AfD discussion, before the discussion has closed, is not the correct means of advocating for retention. Guliolopez ( talk ) 19:24, 19 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong delete. This should have been nominated for speedy delete. This nonnotable man created a Wikipedia article about himself and his business. Delete per WP:AUTOBIO , WP:PROMO , WP:COI , WP:GNG . . . the list goes on. Nothing in that article indicates notability for encyclopedic coverage. The sources do not meet standards for what is considered reliable and valid. In fact, they include the creator/subject's own primary sources. The person in question also cheats by repeatedly deleting the AfD notice on the article, but that is a separate issue. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 21:13, 25 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Sheela Pandit: This article is also same. — Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 05:57, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Politicians , Women , India , and Bihar . Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 05:57, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete zero evidence of notability. This was declined at AfC a few times, then yesterday the author had it G7'd, only to create it in the main space instead; that's just blatant gaming of the system. Fails WP:GNG / WP:NPOL . -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 07:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG . DSP 2092 ( 👤 , 🗨️ ) Comment now speedied as G5 . -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 14:16, 28 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Islamization of Bengali language: It is a politically motivated article which has no belonging in the Free Encyclopaedia. Jaunpurzada ( talk ) 21:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC)* Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bangladesh and India . Jaunpurzada ( talk ) 21:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 April 12 . — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 22:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions . Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 22:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment . Many governments try to do things to language for political reasons. A French-speaking government may want to replace words borrowed from English with pure French ones, for example. The government of a Muslim-majority government may want to use language policy to demonstrate how pro-Islam it is. For more on ways in which language can be used and misused for political purposes, see Language police and re-read Nineteen Eighty-Four . Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 23:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:10, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] * Keep , from the time past of bengali language history this reformation was significant, which scholars named as Dobhashi , most of the middle age bengali poets wrote in this form including Alaol 's Padmavati (poem) , Shah Muhammad Saghir 's Yusuf-Zulekha etc.; besides the topic has a significant coverage in Bengali language movement , former Education secretery Fazlur Rahman (politician) took initiatives for it in 1950 decade which is widely cited in academic books and news media, without this collaborative topic, language movement can not be explained, thus it's a must to have an article about it, and it is totally a false accusation that it is a synthesis and original research. Bengali editor ( talk ) 01:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC) Sock, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lazy-restless [ reply ] Draftify : Could be improved, but not suitable as an article for the moment. '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk | contribs ) 02:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep per Bengali editor. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk ) 21:53, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hi, Pharaoh of the Wizards , please see my comment below. আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 23:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L iz Read! Talk! 22:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom. Also a repost of Pak-Bangla language ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pak-Bangla language ) (I can't see the deleted version but i can see https:// en . everybodywiki.com/Pak-Bangla_language This time they added "In Nawabi Bengal" section as extra). Also created by LTA, we should not encourage LTA by keeping it. -- আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 23:54, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Didier Guillon: It fails WP:GNG with some clear WP:COI concerns. It was created by a WP:SPA in 2018. GuardianH ( talk ) 02:15, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Visual arts , France , and Switzerland . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:31, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's been G11, I think we can close this. Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:56, 24 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Battle of Tashkent (713): Lev Gumilevs book mentions nothing about this event on page 374 [40] . Article looks WP:OR to me. HistoryofIran ( talk ) 00:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : As per the above rationale. ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 02:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions . CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:08, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uzbekistan-related deletion discussions . CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:08, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as more tiresome made-up battlebollox. We already have detailed coverage of the verifiable events at Qutayba ibn Muslim and Muslim conquest of Transoxiana . This is a fanciful content fork. Mccapra ( talk ) 07:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per nomination. There is zero ability to verify the alleged sources on the page as they are poor citations. It is noted in the infobox that the result of the battle was Not clear (no sources available to verify) . If there are no sources to determine important information of a battle then such a page isn't warranted. ElderZamzam ( talk ) 10:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:56, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom. Okoslavia ( talk ) 13:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete incomplete, unverifiable sources, no reason to keep. -- Kansas Bear ( talk ) 18:41, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Dznrm: BuySomeApples ( talk ) 05:18, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Maine . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Abdul Adnan: Take e.g. the first source [30] , from the Times of India (or something similar), used to source his awards and nominations. All very high praise, but it seems to be impossible to find out for which series or films he actually did receive these awards for? His IMDb entry (given as an external link) is empty... Fram ( talk ) 15:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Businesspeople , and India . Fram ( talk ) 15:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete this is almost certainly promotional, WP:NOTPROMO . For now, I've removed the most obvious advertisement for the subject's own product. Also, the so-called "Dada Saheb Phalke Indian Television award" seems to be a knock-off award. — siro χ o 16:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - First, PROMO is never a reason for deletion through AfD. If it is a case of TNT, it can be done through Speedy. That aside, the references are classic WP:NEWSORGINDIA so cannot be used to show notability. Notice they are all published within the last 60 days, written in promotional tone, and in publications that allow sponsored content. -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 17:17, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:NOTPROMO / WP:PROMO is part of WP:NOT , which is a valid policy reason for deletion by WP:DEL-REASON#14 . — siro χ o 19:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I believe it would be WP:DEL-REASON#1 since NOT would be criteria for speedy deletion. Being that you went with an WP:ATD and removed promotional content, and since AfC is WP:NOTCLEANUP , I am not sure how that criteria would still apply so the ! vote was puzzling. -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 20:24, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Cricket , and Telangana . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:07, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I have moved this back to mainspace; the creator draftified the article without discussing and without consensus. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:22, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I see you did the same with another AfD that was moved by creator. I attempted to move it back but see you fixed it before I could figure out the process. Thanks for doing that. -- CNMall41 ( talk ) 20:25, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Bùi Quốc Huy: Inaccurate information is found in the article which cannot be verified by reliable sources, such as being signed by Creative Artists Agency or being nominated as a Top New Artist by NME Magazine. Article has been sent back to draft space several times but keeps reappearing in article space with the issues unaddressed. ... disco spinster talk 15:25, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Vietnam . ... disco spinster talk 15:25, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note that I've deleted it per G5 . The vast majority of edits to the article were by various socks; the edits by other users were undoing the damage. -- Ponyo bons mots 22:26, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
2019 Hyderabad Flyover Accident: WP:NOTNEWS applies as there are no WP:LASTING effects. '''[[ User:CanonNi ]]''' ( talk • contribs ) 07:09, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] delete Lorenzo1235 ( talk ) 08:12, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions . Shellwood ( talk ) 09:20, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events , Transportation , and Telangana . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 10 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
S.R Mahadeva Sarma S.R Rajasree: - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 09:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , India , and Kerala . - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 09:56, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Unsourced article. Author is probably connected to the subject WP:OR . A WP:BEFORE search on both together and individually does not bring many results. Fails GNG . Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 11:48, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I found these [23] and [24] , but they seem to be interviews. Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 11:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete promotional, not notable. Likely speedy, as above. microbiology Marcus [ petri dish · growths ] 11:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Harvey Moeis: However, according to WP:INVALIDBIO , merely being associated with a notable person, such as a spouse, does not warrant a standalone article. Additionally, although the individual later becomes an alleged suspect in a corruption case, WP:PERPETRATOR specifies that the crime must be unusual or noteworthy to merit a standalone article. Furthermore, WP:BLPCRIME cautions against including material that suggests an individual has committed or is accused of a crime, unless there is a secured conviction. In this case, it's important to note that he is still a suspect and has not been convicted yet. Ckfasdf ( talk ) 05:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Per nom and really no substantial coverage of the subject generally. Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 06:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Businesspeople , and Indonesia . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : For all the reasons stated above. 「Hype Boy」 TALK 06:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
2023 Ulsan Hyundai FC season: Shellwood ( talk ) 22:04, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:23, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge or Redirect to 2022-23 Manchester City F.C. season I'm not too knowledgeable on the subject, but these articles seem to be about the same topic. As this one is shorter, it could just be redirected instead of merged (unless it has significant text that the other doesn't). Also, WP:COMMONNAME . Again, I don't know much about this, but the club's main article doesn't make any mention of a name change in the lede. Asparagusus (interaction) 23:13, 12 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as the article content was ripped off another article and has nothing to do with the article's name. @ Asparagusus : Ulsan Hyundai FC has nothing to do with Manchester City F.C. . :3 F4U ( they /it ) 01:24, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, and ban this user as this is a long-standing vandal which was banned many times already, sock of Hyundaiga ( talk · contribs ) and Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Bule Cloud and many many banned IP accounts. Snowflake91 ( talk ) 10:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per above, nonsense article. Possibly eligible for CSD under G3? Giant Snowman 15:34, 13 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Coach Henry E.V.K: It was nominated for CSD as a trivial recreation of a page previously deleted via discussion. Improbably, that CSD was contested. So now we're here. Just like last time, the page fails WP:GNG and WP:SINGER . There is a single short article in the Daily Trust that does not meet "significant" coverage and is not "multiple" sources. "Beautiful Arewa" does not appear to be a reliable source (appears to be a blog at best). The remainder of the sources are just links to tracks on Apple Music which are not reliable sources. Google does not bring up any missing sources, nor does there appear to be any new material since the last deletion discussion. Delete and salt. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco ( talk ) 05:59, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Nigeria . 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco ( talk ) 05:59, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Just thought I'd mention that the CSD tag was removed by an editor with 17 edits. So, it's not like an administrator disagreed with your assessment. L iz Read! Talk! 06:44, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Thanks @ Liz : I'm trying proactively to not gatekeep solely based on edit count, but it didn't go unnoticed. I'm trying to get better about assuming the best from new users except when it's obvious shenanigans. Thanks for everything you do. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco ( talk ) 07:36, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete G4 clearly applies in this case. - KH-1 ( talk ) 09:32, 21 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Nirav Chahwala: A WP:BEFORE found nothing better to establish notability. Was originally draftified but moved back to mainspace by creator. CNMall41 ( talk ) 17:31, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India . CNMall41 ( talk ) 17:31, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - I have moved this back to mainspace; the creator draftified the article without discussing and without consensus. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:22, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - not a single reliable source. FatalFit | ✉ | ✓ 20:15, 29 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Kanta Prasad: On top of that I don't think they should they be forced to have a biography on Wikipedia due to one unfortunate incident. See Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event and, even more importantly, Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Presumption in favor of privacy . CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk) , Huliva 17:20, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India . Shellwood ( talk ) 17:26, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Itzeazy India: The article, although a stub, has a promotional tune as in " The company simplifying government documentations for common citizens and offers doorstep citizen services across 12 major cities in India " which is 50% of the article. The sources in the article are not reliable except for The Times of India which according to Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources " known to accept payments from persons and entities in exchange for positive coverage." FuzzyMagma ( talk ) 09:47, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions . FuzzyMagma ( talk ) 09:47, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies , Technology , and Delhi . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:08, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Not much about the company online outside of press releases. -- Primium ( talk ) 17:18, 11 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as WP:G5 for being a block evading sock with no substantial edits from good faith accounts Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:34, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per G5 , obviously created by sock puppet with no edits from uninvolved users. HarukaAmaranth 春 香 11:58, 17 October 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Nabin luhagun: Has three roles, all of which were minor. There is also nothing in-depth that would show how he meets WP:GNG . CNMall41 ( talk ) 07:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Nepal , India , and Tamil Nadu . CNMall41 ( talk ) 07:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep It passes WP:GNG and have significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources.Thank you. WikipedianRam ( talk ) 09:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete UPE spam. Fake references . Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fake references . None of the references have mentioned the name. Krishna Dahal ( talk ) 11:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] References have mentioned the name please check properly. WikipedianRam ( talk ) 11:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] None of the reliable sources have the name mentioned, nor do any sources support any of the claims. Krishna Dahal ( talk ) 11:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, name have mentioned and it supports too. So, please review it properly and hope you will make a good discussion.Thank you. WikipedianRam ( talk ) 11:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
EdubuzzKids: Fails WP:CORP , WP:WEB , and WP:GNG . No significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Jfire ( talk ) 19:56, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Websites . Jfire ( talk ) 19:56, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United States of America . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:18, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete WP:A7 Kinopiko talk 05:33, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Acharya Vishuddhasagar Ji: And pls verify if there is any sock puppets like stuff present in this case, ty - Awful Reader ( talk ) 18:03, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Buddhism . - Awful Reader ( talk ) 18:03, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - I actually just nominated this for CSD - there is no indication of importance. All 'sources' are social media. Obviously promotional. In any case, fails GNG. ‡ El cid, el campeador talk 18:21, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and Madhya Pradesh . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:38, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Saed Ahmed Bhalli: Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 14:06, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians , Politics , Pakistan , and Punjab . Syed A. Hussain Quadri ( talk ) 14:06, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . As always, people do not get Wikipedia articles just for running as candidates in elections they didn't win — the notability test at WP:NPOL is holding a notable office, not just running for one, while candidates get included only if either (a) they have some other claim of preexisting notability for other reasons that would already have gotten them an article anyway, or (b) they can show credible evidence that their candidacy should be seen as a special case of significantly greater notability than everybody else's candidacies. This shows neither of those things, and is not sourced anywhere remotely close to well enough to claim that he was exempted from NPOL on grounds of passing GNG. Bearcat ( talk ) 15:12, 18 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . Agree with Bearcat. Not elected and nothing notable done outside politics to justify page. JoinFluffy250 ( talk ) 16:21, 19 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per the above, quite to the point, contribution by my honorable colleagues. - The Gnome ( talk ) 15:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Bearcat. Also, the article creator has been blocked for sockpuppetry. Wikishovel ( talk ) 16:39, 23 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Muhammad Luqman (activist): The sources on the article does not seem to mention the subject's name. Fails WP:NBIO Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 06:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions . Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk ) 06:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete no source that mentions subject so unsourced BLP; probably self promotion/autobio. KylieTastic ( talk ) 10:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete In addition to everything User:KylieTastic said, the sources provided don't even mention the subject in question. Also, one of the sources is a TikTok page? Fails basic WP:GNG and no WP:SIGCOV . -- My Pants Metal ( talk ) 13:32, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delte : I agree that the sources are not reliable, it subject fails basic WP:GNG and there has been no signficant coverage. I've also checked claims made in through the process of editing/creating the article, and don't find anything that would change this position. Klbrain ( talk ) 14:00, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Carlos Parra (singer): Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 05:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions . Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 05:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Internet , Mexico , and Arizona . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 06:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Chalukiya: [1] Gujjars are an ethnic group native to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. They speak the Gujari language , which is a dialect of Rajasthani. Gujaratis, on the other hand, are an ethnic group from Gujarat , an Indian state. They communicate in Gujarati, an Indo-Aryan language. Gujjars and Gujaratis are not related since they hail from separate locations, speak different languages, and have different customs. Since Gujarat was once known as Gujaratra , locals are referred to as Gurjars or Gurjardesha residents, despite the fact that the caste referenced in this article belongs to a completely distinct tribe that raises cattle. By duplicating Chalukya dynasty , inaccurate information is supplied in this article. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 18:29, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] ^ Sen, Sailendra (2013). A Textbook of Medieval Indian History. Primus Books. p. 28. ISBN 978-93-80607-34-4. Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and India . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:49, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions . - MPGuy2824 ( talk ) 03:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : article creator has been indefinitely blocked, for resumed disruptive editing including blanking Chalukiya being discussed here, a cut-n-paste move of its contents to new title Chalukya clan , and edit-warring to preserve the improper page-move. Previously blocked for trying to throw another AFD with sockpuppetry, so might well try the same here. 2A00:23EE:1CB8:5F8B:50C7:59FF:FEB3:3107 ( talk ) 05:13, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Success On The Spectrum: Source 1 doesn't go in-depth at all. Source 2 seems promotional. Source 3 and 6 is a mere mention. Source 4 is marginally fine, seems routine though. Source 5 is a press release. TLA (talk) 10:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: The original creator of the article, Binawood , is blocked for sockpuppeting. A G5 case? Someone please verify. TLA (talk) 10:32, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Health and fitness , Organizations , and Texas . Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 10:50, 14 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions . 08:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC) Roger (Dodger67) ( talk ) 08:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Kidprod: I can't find a single reliable source that mentions him. Also, article is written in a tone like an advertisement in some places, and simply not in an encyclopedic tone in others (like the "Early life") section. Also, author is kidprod themself. [8] Relativity 21:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Bibliographies , and Music . Relativity 21:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello I created the article and I agree with you. Maybe you could help improve the parts that you think aren't good. This is my first article, I don't have any experience. I genuinely could use your help. Kidprod ( talk ) 21:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - A WP:TOOSOON case. Wikipedia articles are supposed to be summaries of high-quality coverage in reputable sources independent of the subject. For musicians that's basically press coverage. Keep working and sharing your stuff and you'll probably get there. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 22:12, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] so its gonna get deleted? Kidprod ( talk ) 22:15, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Kidprod Not necessarily. You should read Wikipedia:Introduction to deletion process and Wikipedia:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Relativity 22:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] ok imma do that now Kidprod ( talk ) 22:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 22:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ive completely rewritten the article tell me if it still sucks Kidprod ( talk ) 23:10, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Relativity is my edit ok? Kidprod ( talk ) 23:32, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : WP:G11 advertisment. v/r - Seawolf35 T -- C 23:38, 25 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete due to the fact that this meets G11. AlphaBetaGamma ( Talk/Report any mistakes here ) 00:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - arguably an A7. -- Whpq ( talk ) 02:01, 26 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Stainoff: Does not have SIGCOV. Mvqr ( talk ) 15:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and South Africa . Mvqr ( talk ) 15:09, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Worth noting that this is an autobiography. RetroCosmos ( talk ) 15:14, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ RetroCosmos : yeah then it definitely needs to be draftified at least. Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:18, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment . I wonder if it is possible to remove the statement as false and unsourced and then tag it under WP:A7 ? Or just tag it under WP:G11 Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:16, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This can easily pass G11 in my view RetroCosmos ( talk ) 15:20, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Not a G11 in my view, it isn't a blatant advert. The relevant speedy criteria would be WP:G3 as a "blatant hoax", but I feel it is borderline. Many admins would delete it as G3, but some would not. -- Mvqr ( talk ) 15:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - If the first album by an unknown beginner debuted at #1 in a major country, it would make the news. All this rapper has is the usual social media pages and self-uploads of a few songs that have generated no notice from anyone else whatsoever. The procedural discussion on speedy deleting above is not really necessary and could actually be a distraction; such an obvious failure of notability can be deleted today or next week. --- DOOMSDAYER 520 ( TALK | CONTRIBS ) 16:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete. Per @ Doomsdayer520 ’s comment. (My bold isn’t working, I’m editing from mobile currently. It prints as ‘’’.) User Memer ( chat ) Tribs 17:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Autobiography of a non-notable individual, they even vandalized Nasty C and put their details there moments ago. dxneo ( talk ) 18:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Shyamal Sylhet: The topic is not wiki notable. Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 05:20, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media , Websites , and Bangladesh . Vinegarymass911 ( talk ) 05:20, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Shyamal Sylhet article have eligibility for Wikipedia . It's Translated from Bengali Wikipedia . Mainul Saiman ( talk ) 05:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete per nom. Also it was created by a sock (user:Rnwiki-global). আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 08:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The page creator is not a confirmed sockpuppet. Please wait for confirmation before tagging articles for speedy deletion on these grounds. L iz Read! Talk! 22:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Please see wikidata . আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 12:51, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's May Wrong, I am not known about ( user:Rnwiki-global ). Mainul Saiman ( talk ) 15:35, 12 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] CU note I have blocked | speedy delete |
Obi Emeka Chukwudi: If not, this article needs some cleanup to meet WP:MOS Lord serious pig 07:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions . Lord serious pig 07:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Tagged for speedy deletion as G11 since it perfectly qualifies under such criterion. There was no need for bringing this to AfD. CycloneYoris talk! 07:15, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:17, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : I added A7 to the G11, there was no need for an AfD. Vanderwaalforces ( talk ) 08:29, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] speedy delete : per A7. Nightrises10 ( talk ) 11:57, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
GP Records: Suggesting SALT if this closes as delete as it has been re-created by the same editor. Star Mississippi 01:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Indonesia . Star Mississippi 01:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Recreated article by (suspected) sock. The reference does not mention GP records at all it is about Universal Music taking over EMI. This in no way passes WP:NCOMPANY or WP:GNG . Delete and Salt. Hughesdarren ( talk ) 01:38, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note I have semi'ed the article so we don't play whack an IP for seven days. If someone has a better solution, feel free. Star Mississippi 01:40, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] and I've filed Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MFajarMardiansyah24032000 as the only one blocked is for DE so we're unfortunately not in G5 territory. Hopefully we will be for the next iteration. Star Mississippi 01:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Tony Michael: Not meeting GNG, likely PROMO. Oaktree b ( talk ) 04:46, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] :: Keep : Nominator says, he can't finding sourcing for the subject and he says the sources are fluff pieces using gtranslate ? and says doesn't meet GNG. Here are the reasons why its wrong and the article should be kept. Reply to each section : "Can find sources" - There are around 6 unique big length article all from reliable and independent secondary news sources all from reliable and reputed newspapers and magazines like International Business Times , Malayala Manorama , Vanitha , Onmanorama , Mathrubhumi etc talking about the subject. So it's irrelevant to tell that "can't find sources". "Sources are not fluff pieces with and without using gtranslate" - There are 3 english news articles all detailed articles and secondary news sources, one from International Business Times and two from Onmanorama which doesn't need any Gtranslate and 3 other Malayalam detailed article secondary sources from Malayala Manorama , Vanitha and Mathrubhumi , all written by journalists as listed in these article and this detailed articles are no way fluff pieces. "Meets GNG" - The International Business Times article https://www.ibtimes.co.in/kerala-showing-hesitance-accept-lgbt-community-says-top-makeup-artist-840767 is a detailed featured secondary news article about the subject , talking only about him in detail, similar is the case with 2 Onmanorama articles and additionally there are 3 very detailed and featured article secondary sources from Malayala Manorama , Vanitha and Mathrubhumi which makes the article pass GNG . "Not PROMO" - The news references listed from International Business Times is written by journalist named Nirmal Narayanan . 2 Onmanorama articles are written by journalists Anagha Jayan E and Padmakumar K respectively. The Malayala Manorama article is written by journalist Deepthi Pellishery, The Mathrubhumi article is a special feature . Which proves that this is definetly not promo. Christopheronthemove ( talk ) 06:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC) Striking sock. Grey joy talk 16:21, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Kerala . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 07:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The International Business Times is not a reliable source; a special feature implies paid promotion in a newspaper. [39] Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:38, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, I can't find mention of the person in "reliable sources". Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:39, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : known for his viral photoshoots, celebrity makeup work for many South Indian celebrities . This is a promo piece and none of the sources are reliable. What is the claim of notability here? The subject becoming one among the many makeup artists and hairstylists of celebrities? This don't even pass WP:BASIC . Fails WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:GNG . 111.92.78.199 ( talk ) 18:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] :: COMMENT : IP Votes can't be counted as per Wikipedia:IP addresses are not people Christopheronthemove ( talk ) 13:12, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Where it is mentioned here that IP Votes can't be counted. Don't make your own rules. I make regular edits from IP without creating any account. I also closely monitor edits of many users like you. My IP address is not static and it keeps changing several times. 111.92.78.203 ( talk ) 13:59, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Fails WP:GNG , was unable to find sources that support this article. Reviewed the sources and they also do not establish notability. Source assessment table: Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG ? International Business Times ? Was not able to find anything about the reporter There is consensus that the International Business Times is generally unreliable. WP:IBTIMES ~ Article is about the subject ✘ No onmanorama ? Nothing in the archives for onmanorama ? Nothing in the archives for onmanorama Article is just photos and some captions ✘ No onmanorama ? Nothing in the archives for onmanorama ? Nothing in the archives for onmanorama ~ Article isn't really about him but it does mention him and he is quoted ? Unknown Manorama Online Appears to be independent Considered a news org Coverage from a viral photoshoot ✔ Yes vanitha ? Nothing in the archives for vanitha ? Nothing in the archives for vanitha Article is about the same photoshop with the same photos ? Unknown mathrubhumi ? Article has no analysis or depth just a link to a youtube video ~ Article is just a link to a youtube video with ~1500 views ✘ No vanitha ? Same source as source 5 & 9 ? Same source as source 5 & 9 Same source as source 5 & 9 ? Unknown International Business Times ? Was not able to find anything about the reporter There is consensus that the International Business Times is generally unreliable. WP:IBTIMES Article is about the subject ✘ No vanitha ? Same source as source 5 & 7 ? Same source as source 5 & 7 Same source as source 5 & 7 ? Unknown This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table }} . Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 23:34, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] :: COMMENT : This source analysis is baseless and biased . They have not even added reporters names and considered every article written by different journalists as not reliable. I will send the genuine source analysis in next comment. Christopheronthemove ( talk ) 13:19, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] COMMENT : ' Here is the unbiased source analysis : Source assessment table: Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG ? International Business Times Journalist name - NIRMAL NARAYANAN - https://www.ibtimes.co.in/reporters/nirmal-narayanan Syndicated news pieces in International Business Times is generally unreliable per WP:IBTIMES , but this is IB Times staff jounalist written article which is reliable. 454 word Article about the subject ✔ Yes Onmanorama Journalist name - Anagha Jayan E - https://www.onmanorama.com/authors/anagha-jayan-e.html Onmanorama is the english online newspaper from Malayala Manorama 256 word Article about the subject ✔ Yes Onmanorama Journalist name - Padmakumar K - https://www.onmanorama.com/authors/padmakumar-k.html Onmanorama is the english online newspaper from Malayala Manorama 520 word Article about him and his works (Title itself marks him as Artist behind those brilliant makeovers) ✔ Yes Manorama Online Journalist name - ദീപ്തി പെല്ലിശ്ശേരി - https://www.manoramaonline.com/authors.deepthi-pellisseri.html Article from Malayala Manorama 500+ word Article about him and his viral photoshoot ✔ Yes Vanitha Journalist name - Binsha Muhammed - https://www.vanitha.in/authorlandingpage.html?author=Binsha-Muhammed Article from Vanitha magazine having 6 Million circulation 500+ Article about him and his life history ✔ Yes Mathrubhumi News Program Producer - AMRITHA A U - as listed in the video Article with the interview video of the artist from Mathrubhumi News Article with the interview video of the artist from Mathrubhumi News ✔ Yes This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table }} . This is the unbiased and genuine source analysis placing all journalist details Christopheronthemove ( talk ) 14:25, 23 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Napoli Resturant: No significant sources as far as I can tell. As of 13:21EST Nov 25 compltetly unsourced as well. AriTheHorse 18:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink , Companies , and United Arab Emirates . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Tagged to A7 speedy delete , obviously shouldn't need discussion. Reywas92 Talk 19:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Традиционная одежда Липецкой области.: 64andtim (chat) 21:59, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Roger Cash: This article was declined at AfC on 8 January for failing GNG, but the editor has gone and published the article directly with no changes. This man was the father of Cliff Cash and Wiley Cash , but there is nothing in his own existence that makes him notable. Checks of Internet Archive, Google Scholar, and Google Books, bring up nothing. A basic Google search locates his obituary , which provides nothing to suggest why Cash should have his own Wikipedia article. Being the father of two notable people does not make you notable as well. Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk ) 20:36, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions . CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:51, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions . CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:51, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions . CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete . Eligible under criterion A7 and tagged accordingly. CycloneYoris talk! 20:54, 12 January 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Golam Rabby: No indication of significance. Previous deleted on 21 January 2024. scope_creep Talk 19:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors , Journalism , and Bangladesh . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:29, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golam Rabby ~ Eejit43 ( talk ) 22:19, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Heer Kaur: Lacks WP:SIGCOV . Macbeejack ☎ 14:13, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Actors and filmmakers , Women , and India . Macbeejack ☎ 14:13, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Jharkhand-related deletion discussions . CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:19, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions . CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:19, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Radio Jupiter: Sources don't show notability, redirect to Radio Caroline ? IgelRM ( talk ) 15:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and United Kingdom . IgelRM ( talk ) 15:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 15:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify : I don't think Radio Caroline is the right answer. I think this requires work to show notability, since kt fails WP:NCORP currently. Draft space is a place to work with little pressure 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or Draftify - This article does not speak for itself . It does not explain to a reader why the station is notable , and Wikipedia is written for the readers. This has been a contested draftify, so if this article is draftified here, it may not be moved back to article space except via AFC . Robert McClenon ( talk ) 17:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete To anyone in 2024, this is a bog-standard Internet oldies station run by who are now older personnel. This is no different from a known commercial radio station keeping an older staff member on Saturday mornings for listener goodwill so they don't get 'Cruel megabroadcaster fires innocent DJ for being too old' headlines. The N for Radio Caroline cannot extend to something that was created well after its existence ended as a nostalgia appeal. Nate • ( chatter ) 18:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per Nate - my thoughts exactly. RobinCarmody ( talk ) 18:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : PROMO with no coverage in RS. This is a different Radio Jupiter [7] , nothing else found. I don't think the redirect as suggested would help. Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , promo piece on a 'radio station' with zero evidence of notability. Do not draftify, as there has been plenty of time for the necessary sources to be gathered, and if nothing has turned up in the past few years, I can't see that suddenly changing in the next few months. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 10:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Church of the Living God – Jewell Dominion: The extremely limited RS that relate to the Jewell Dominion primarily cover either Tate or the steel guitar musical tradition that grew out of her church(es). Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 01:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] redirect per above. At any rate the article as it stands is essentially unusable, to the point where I have to wonder if it was copied from a church source. Mangoe ( talk ) 02:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Good point. Earwig's Copyvio Detector finds 96% similarity with this: https://cotlghqindy.org/our-past-leaders/ Dclemens1971 ( talk ) 02:39, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity , Alabama , Georgia (U.S. state) , and Illinois . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:16, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete as G12. The idea that a church would copy Wikipedia is not plausible. The idea that someone well-meaning would violate copyright in such a manner is. Jclemens ( talk ) 07:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] ... and it's gone. Suggest we close this as both G12 and consensus that it wasn't usable as it stood regardless. Jclemens ( talk ) 08:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Mir Qurram Ali: ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri ( ✍️ ) 07:22, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Politicians . ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri ( ✍️ ) 07:22, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions . Shellwood ( talk ) 09:42, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Telangana-related deletion discussions . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom. Twinkle1990 ( talk ) 08:59, 18 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Not a notable politician, failed WP:NPOL. ——‘ Syed Aala Qadri Kalkatvi ( talk ) 18:04, 18 August 2023 (UTC) ’ [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Keyword Tool (website): Autograph ( talk ) 08:16, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment seems to be a recreation of Keyword Tool which was deleted two weeks ago at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Keyword_Tool_(2nd_nomination) Oblivy ( talk ) 09:11, 14 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
DIDWW Ireland Limited: References are mainly press releases in niche press and listings, doesn't satisfy WP:SIGCOV . Bastun Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 21:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business , Companies , and Ireland . Shaws username . talk . 22:01, 23 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and Internet . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 00:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: I agree with the nom. ww2censor ( talk ) 11:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - per nom. Not a notable company. Spleodrach ( talk ) 12:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
An Jong-ho: Simione001 ( talk ) 02:21, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions . Simione001 ( talk ) 02:21, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions . Simione001 ( talk ) 02:21, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions . Simione001 ( talk ) 02:21, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:10, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 14:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I've given a search for him in Korean with no results at all. :3 F4U ( they /it ) 08:24, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : if anyone really isn't finding any web hits for the name 안정호, they should double-check the search query because that's a pretty common name. That said, I can only find enough glancing mentions in the South Korean press to verify participation as a midfielder in the North Korean national team and Amnokgang Sports Club. I do find it a bit odd that I can't come up with any mentions at all from North Korean sources (the only Google hits from Rodong Sinmun and KCNA for this Korean name relate to a composer). I think it is rather obvious that deletions of this kind diminish our value as an encyclopedia . But I have come to find standing athwart the diminishment of the project yelling "Stop!" rather unrewarding, so I suppose I'll just abstain. -- Visviva ( talk ) 17:53, 17 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Oop, I didn't get the team name right in my search! My bad. I do see some results now, but still none with significant coverage. :3 F4U ( they /it ) 23:30, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Phelim Kine: This one is about a journalist who writes on many notable topics, but there's no evidence that he himself is notable. The references in the article are links to his biographies in various publications he's written for, all of which use almost identical text and provide no in-depth information. The most compelling of the refs provided is an interview about Liu Xiaobo , but it is from Human Rights Watch , an agency where he is a deputy director, and is still about the topic and not about the journalist. I did not turn up any sort of depth of coverage from the internet. Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 17:40, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Journalism . Ivanvector ( Talk / Edits ) 17:40, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions . CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:25, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : "work appeared in", and "was [ sic ] spoken to" notable orgs is lame attempt at coattail notability, specifically listed at WP:Identifying PR which says to look out for Sourcing to indexes of the author's contributions to publications, instead of to individual contributions . These indexes constitute the majority of the sourcing in the article: sources 4,5,6,7,8, 10, and 11 out of 13 total in the revision I'm currently looking at . This is also obviously self-sourced e.g. "Phelim Kine {{|}} The Guardian". the Guardian. Retrieved 2023-10-29 and is the kind of thing that should never appear in an encyclopedic article. D per nominator. ☆ Bri ( talk ) 19:52, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete WP:G5 - created by blocked or banned user in violation of their block or ban. Kinopiko talk 20:01, 11 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Aurora Dream: This article has been draftified once, by User:Exemplo347 , and then declined by User:AngusWOOF , but was then also copied back into article space by the originator. The first paragraph of the History section would need to be deleted as peacockery if this article otherwise should be kept, but it doesn't address any of the musical notability criteria , and doesn't address general notability . The draft can be left in draft space to be worked on by any neutral editors. Robert McClenon ( talk ) 23:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music , and Florida . Robert McClenon ( talk ) 23:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per WP:G11 . The excessive external linking and spamming of references are red flags. Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 23:57, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Herlambang Perdana Wiratraman: Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 18:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions . Allan Nonymous ( talk ) 18:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Indonesia . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep There is no indication that the nominator has done WP:BEFORE before creating a deletion page [36] . He also lack the ability to understand about Indonesian subject and notability of sources used in the article as he did here in other nomination page that he created [37] [38] . 202.43.93.9 ( talk ) 03:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] — 202.43.93.9 ( talk • contribs ) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
2024 Women's Premier League (cricket) squads: Therefore redirecting there is sensible, but bold redirects like this usually just get reverted, so AFD is best course of action. This is also consistent with the men's equivalent event Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Indian Premier League squads , which is looking like it has consensus to redirect squad article too. Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 15:47, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women , Lists of people , Cricket , and India . Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 15:47, 27 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete : per G7 𝓥𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷24𝓑𝓲𝓸 ( ᴛᴀʟᴋ ) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Ashish Music Gallery: Theroadislong ( talk ) 07:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts and Music . Theroadislong ( talk ) 07:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment sorry I should probably have tagged this with speedy deletion. Theroadislong ( talk ) 07:49, 16 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Fosh Airways: Gaismagorm ( talk ) 13:21, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Travel and tourism . Gaismagorm ( talk ) 13:21, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] whoops, withdrawn cause I just now noticed that it was already nominated for speedy deletion Gaismagorm ( talk ) 13:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Left-wing Youth (China): The current entry is a bad case of " Wikipedia:WORDISSUBJECT ", and is actually about the leftist youth movement in contemporary China, not the leftist youth as the term that has been used since the May Fourth Movement . In addition, I've never seen a likewise entry in Wikipedia. I know there are entries like the " American Left " and the Wandervogel , but I've never seen "Left-wing Youth (USA)". From this I suggest deleting, renaming or giving it a restart. ときさき くるみ not because they are easy , but because they are hard 06:55, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: China and Politics . ときさき くるみ not because they are easy , but because they are hard 07:14, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] You first need to proof that "someone am a sock of someone", otherwise it is an ungrounded claim. Regarding the article itself, I don't see any problem here. "Left-wing Youth (USA)" does not exist because there is no such a distinct youth community associated with certain figures and events in the USA. If there is (I don't think so), surely it could be created as well. NZCAJD2 ( talk ) 08:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] IMO "a sock of" is quite Wikipedia:DUCK , as you have done twice of evading. I wouldn't mind pinging a few admins here to confirm this. @ Sotiale and Blablubbs : I don't know how the references you cite demonstrate that it's a "distinct group associated with certain people and events"; technically, only about 4 or 5 sources speak specifically to the composition of the student left, while most of the rest of the literature treats it as a general term. Therefore, a bit of Wikipedia:Recentism . What you say about the US not having one is also problematic ( [33] ). ときさき くるみ not because they are easy , but because they are hard 08:35, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Let me inform other potential participants of the AfD discussion. The user initiated AfD of the article's Chinese version, which seems doomed to fail. So now he wants it to be deleted in English wikipedia. But the English one is exactly translated from there. I would advice you to focus on the content of the article instaed of referring to other cases, being in the USA or elsewhere. The Subject of the article is very clear: a gounp of college students born in the 1990s, mostly related the Jasic Incident and Peking University Marxist Society . It is not about "left-wing youth" during the 1920s. If you want to create an article for the latter (I doubt whether there are enough sources), you can do it. NZCAJD2 ( talk ) 09:41, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: NZCAJD2 has been verified and blocked globally. ときさき くるみ not because they are easy , but because they are hard 13:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I added WP:G5 speedy deletion request to the article as it's created by sock with no substantive edits afterwards. Jumpytoo Talk 00:36, 26 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Estetik International: The sources in this article, as well as its content, are almost entirely self-promotion, "best of" lists and the like. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 16:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine and Turkey . WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 16:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: spam. Tehonk ( talk ) 18:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It will be a G5 speedy in the end anyway: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bodiadub Tehonk ( talk ) 20:19, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Travel and tourism . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 20:38, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Promotional spam, likely paid. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 21:49, 29 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete: spam. -- Kadı Message 17:36, 3 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Promotional, WP:G11 . Aintabli ( talk ) 03:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Sanjana Ganesan: Quick Quokka [ talk • contribs ] 21:41, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , News media , Television , Cricket , and India . Quick Quokka [ talk • contribs ] 21:41, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] This is the second time this page has been nominated, and the first time the result was "delete". What happened? Quick Quokka [ talk • contribs ] 21:44, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Question : The article is junk, but (however unfortunately) this is not a reason for deletion. Which reason for deletion are you invoking here, QuickQuokka ? -- Hoary ( talk ) 22:16, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Hoary : I think it was pretty clear I was invoking #8 (not notable) Literally the first word of my comment is unnotable . Quick Quokka [ talk • contribs ] 22:17, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] But QuickQuokka , #8 is not "Articles that fail to make it clear that their subjects meet the relevant notability guideline (RNG)" or similar; it's "Articles whose subjects fail to meet the [RNG]". An article can be crap but nevertheless be about a subject that could have been shown to meet the RNG if only the author(s) had had the needed competence and energy. Thus it's normal for the AFD nominator to state that their own energetic googling/duckduckgoing/etc has failed to demonstrate notability. -- Hoary ( talk ) 22:34, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or draftify. Little evidence of notability. Maproom ( talk ) 22:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Maharashtra . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:54, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete or should be moved to Draft . Almost nothing is sourced within the article. 🛧 Layah50♪ 🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう！ ) 23:06, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment This wretchedly bad article, or perhaps its subject, has so far been condemned for lack of notability by QuickQuokka , Maproom , and Layah50 ; but none of these three editors, and nobody else, has yet claimed to have tried but failed to find sources. If any decent sources do exist, I can't assume that they call her "Sanjana Ganesan" (in Roman letters). I don't know what other scripts would be relevant here, I don't know how her name would be written in any of those scripts, and even if I found anything I'd have to depend on Google Translate and would have to guesstimate the reliability of the source. So I hope that energetic and linguistically competent (and of course level-headed) editors contribute to this AFD. I'm very willing to be persuaded that this should be deleted, and if it's deleted then it should be salted too. -- Hoary ( talk ) 23:26, 18 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Looks like the article's been speedied per the author's request ( WP:G7 ). Rotideypoc41352 ( talk · contribs ) 17:13, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I noticed that too, looked like author first moved it to Draft while this AfD was still going on. It seems it got requested to move back here on technical move request, but I'm wasn't sure if the speedy request was from when was moved to draft, or if was after it got moved back. WikiVirus C (talk) 17:16, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Considering the non-notability of the person in question, the article should be deleted. One can't be notable in the ground of notability of his spouse ( Jasprit Bumrah ) ::* Note : While scrolling through Google, I've found this article in Hindi Wikipedia, संजना गणेशन , albeit due to language issues, I am unable make out whether it contains enough stuff. জয় হিন্দ জয় বাংলা ( talk ) 21:30, 19 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Monopoly Massacre: I see not even a single reliable source here. Most are tabloids and one is even a forum post. I tried to find information about this so-called event from reliable and non-Albanian sources, but to no avail. I also suspect copyright violation here. For example, some segments of the article are 90 percent similar with the Memorie.al source. I believe that most of the article's content was copied and pasted from sources, and machine translated, as it was suspected by another editor. StephenMacky1 ( talk ) 09:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Military , Albania , and North Macedonia . StephenMacky1 ( talk ) 09:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Well if you don't really believe the sources and find them unreliable how about you go check out a documentary made by am Albanian historian named Marin Mema he's gonna help you,and my great grandfather witnessed this massacre he even was mobilized by the Partisans and sent in the first front of Syrmian front he even survived and when he returned in 1945 he realized what was happening and how they used to gather Albanian civilians to the tobacco factory in Tetovo called the monopoly of Tetovo so it's a real and important event go watch that documentary they even interview an old man who's uncle got taken and sent to the tobacco factory,and the reason why this massacre isn't know its because the partisans did their best to hide this massacre and make the Albanian people forget about this which they did. AcEagle12 ( talk ) 09:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Could you provide a link to the documentary please? In initial searches I found [23] which I cannot read. Does this refer to the massacre? English language searches are scant and confused by the fact that "Monopoly" is an unrelated English word. Might this be known by another name in English? Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 10:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] here is the documentary https://youtube.com/-Li6ZrSLfzQ? si=_aX2f3uJoQf7oHGo,it's in Albanian and that's where I heard about this massacre and I asked one elderly woman and she explained most of it then I decided to do some research and I found 8 sources and decided to create this article so more people can read about this in English,since 7 of the sources are in Albanian and one of them is in English. AcEagle12 ( talk ) 10:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That link shows unavailable when I click it. Who made the documentary? Also does this massacre have a page on Albanian Wikipedia? I couldn't find one, but I don't speak the language so not sure if I am searching properly. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 13:00, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Wikipedia doesn't allow me to send a link from YouTube but search in youtube "projekti qe Kerkoi zhdukjen e shqiptarve nga trojet shqiptare" and it should appear the channel is called top channel Albania AcEagle12 ( talk ) 16:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete. Straightforward copyvio of this article , as nominator points out. — Moriwen ( talk ) 14:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Ah yes. That's unfortunate. 90.6% similarity according to Earwig Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 15:32, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete - I have tagged the article for speedy deletion. Whether or not there is a notable subject here is unclear but it is a clear copyvio and needs to be removed and revdelled. Additionally my searches to date have not shown this is notable. I had not finished looking, but I think that anyone wanting to write about this should probably find a related page and add something about it there to begin with. I probably would have been looking at the possibility of merge or redirect if there were no copyvio. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk ) 15:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm deleting the speedy deletion cause it isn't needed the discussion isn't closed,and this article is very necessary to be,cause 300 people died,right here your acting like Vidoe Smilevski Bato who wanted this massacre to be forgotten. AcEagle12 ( talk ) 16:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Wendy Lippe: They've managed to drum up a bit of coverage in their local press, but nothing that could satisfy say C3 of WP:CREATIVE because that's symbiotic with general notability. Furthermore, her academic chairs don't satisfy anything approaching WP:NACADEMIC and the verification for on-campus postings is actually quite shakey. Obviously, WP:GNG is a far cry here becuase the sources focus entirly on these local theatre productions. Eichhornia Crassipes ( talk ) 08:38, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators , Actors and filmmakers , Women , Theatre , Psychology , and Massachusetts . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:43, 22 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . No pass of WP:Prof and, as noted above, none for GNG. Xxanthippe ( talk ) 22:58, 22 April 2023 (UTC) . [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
MrShibolet: Zero sources found in Gnews. Nothing for sourcing. Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:03, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions . Oaktree b ( talk ) 03:03, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . WP:NOTLINKEDIN . If sources are found needs WP:TNT , but I found nothing. Also checked "Mar Shibolet" and a few other variations. — siro χ o 04:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions . Shellwood ( talk ) 10:02, 24 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Bitget: I think we need 3rd AfD cause I'm not responsible for former AfDs and draft reviewers hasn't see any significant changes since past. I found in web-archive how it was looks like before me here: https://web.archive.org/web/20231028000951/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitget We need consensus, cause to me - CSD G4 violation might harm my interes to improve Wikipedia, cause my next similar to bitget wishes is KuCoin , WhiteBIT , Qmall , MEXC etc which was deleted before me and I has no clue how it was looks like in past. TBH, I spent my weekend to write the article, then got rejected without any suggestions or comments. So you're welcome to leave any comment throught this AfD. Enjoy-- Antonio Vinzaretti ( talk ) 07:59, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Cryptocurrency , Companies , Economics , and Asia . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:46, 18 December 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antonio Vinzaretti ( talk • contribs ) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 December 20 . — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 08:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment This is so unnecessary. I moved this article to Draft space stating that because it a previous version had been deleted in an AFD, you should submit it to WP:AFC for review. But after it was declined twice, you decided move it back to main space and launch a 3rd AFD! I never said it was a CSD G4 violation, I just said that it should be reviewed by an AFC reviewer. L iz Read! Talk! 08:13, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Before you move article to the draftspace, article was nominated for speedy deletion because of CSD G4, then in draft article was declined because of CSG G4. Looks like Draft reviewers mocking of me, because to me I not violated that. So I am sorry if I bother. I just want to learn how to do. Antonio Vinzaretti ( talk ) 08:15, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment what an odd one... did I get this right, the author has moved their rejected draft past AfC into the main space, and then straight away started this discussion in the hope of reaching a 'keep' verdict to overrule the rejection, not to mention the earlier AfDs? -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 09:22, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes it is. I am interesting to get attention, cause I not accept silence rejection of AfC. As I see I got rejection from you because of WP COPYVIO. I fixed that and mentioned you to take a look as a reviewer, then got silence. No one adviced me how to improve, just declined. Unfair to me. Antonio Vinzaretti ( talk ) 09:27, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] " not to mention the earlier AfDs " what it means and how it even connected with my article? Antonio Vinzaretti ( talk ) 09:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] So if it got AfD I should not continue to work on bitget, kucoin, mexc, qmall, whitebit which probably meet CSD G4 ? Is it my fault that I'm interested in cryptocurrency exchanges? Yes, they were all deleted (I checked), but I'm not responsible for every one lol. It kills my interes. Antonio Vinzaretti ( talk ) 09:38, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Can you take a look on Bybit please? Pretty one, right? I'm going to start AfD on Bybit too. Too strict to me, too kind to Bybit. Antonio Vinzaretti ( talk ) 10:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify ? I guess. I'm not sure what you're trying to prove or why you think the problem is CSD G4. The reason your draft wasn't approved is because there's only routine coverage (mostly of a lawsuit by a more notable company) or non RS crypto sites. It also could use some copyediting but that's a secondary concern. I get that you're trying to learn Wikipedia but that'll be easier if you stop and hear out other editors. BuySomeApples ( talk ) 11:51, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm not sure you even want review the article correctly, cause looks like you just defend your submission decision while you even ignoring changes. I started AfD to let others be involved, enjoy. Not take it personally pls. Then go draftify Bybit , why not bro? Antonio Vinzaretti ( talk ) 11:56, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Bybit does not look ready for mainspace either but it's too old to be draftified, it has to be handled through AfD. Also, just because other stuff exists doesn't mean that Bitget has to have a page. BuySomeApples ( talk ) 12:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It's not even about bybit or bitget. You just too strict, while to bybit too kind. Initiate AfD then for Bybit please, thx. Now I'm not at my PC, so cannot do it right now. And some frustrates me when everyone blames, no one helps to improve or explain. Antonio Vinzaretti ( talk ) 12:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Offtop: Lewcm started AfD here . Antonio Vinzaretti ( talk ) 17:53, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify OP, it would probably be better to work on this as a draft, as they do not qualify for WP:G4 . There will always be other bad articles to delete as well; however, volunteer time is limited and cannot possibly confirm every possible article, thus why the other stuff exists argument is not a good one. Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs ) 14:18, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete don't really see the point of draftifying this, given that was done once already, the draft was then rejected at AfC, and moved into the main space by the author. Moving it back to drafts now would achieve... what, exactly? If someone wants to TNT this, find new and better sources, and rewrite the whole thing from scratch, by all means have at it, but that doesn't need this to be moved to the draft space, surely? (And all this before we even consider that the 1st and 2nd AfD resulted in delete, both in the last six months.) -- Comment why you blame here CSD G4, because of "1st and 2nd AfD resulted in delete, both in the last six months". Where evidence that this version isn't better than previous? So if it deleted once, so I should'nt continue to develop KuCoin article for example? Nice logic. Antonio Vinzaretti ( talk ) 15:57, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] "the draft was then rejected at AfC, and moved into the main space by the author. Moving it back to drafts now would achieve... what, exactly?". Buddy, since moving I extended the article by 12 references (third party significant coverage reliable sources) on 4 different topics. Are you lazy even to check it before blame me for nonsense my contribution? So at minimum it worth another one AfC in the Draft. What a hater... Antonio Vinzaretti ( talk ) 16:36, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I think you would do well to stop WP:BLUDGEONING the discussion and start coming up with some policy-based arguments instead. The reason why the earlier AfDs are relevant is that this subject has been discussed twice quite recently, and on both occasions found non-notable. Therefore the onus is on you to come up with something that clearly demonstrates notability. You couldn't demonstrate that at AfC, and to instead bring this 3rd AfD is bordering on WP:TENDENTIOUS . The AfD department is busy enough as it is, and we shouldn't be litigating the same subject over and over unless there's reasonable cause. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk ) 18:42, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] It has reasons, cause if you take a look properly you will notice that article has changed. Or I do changes for myself lol? So I repeat question, If my further articles on KuCoin, WhiteBIT, Qmall, MEXC, any other exchanges has previous AfD, so I should'nt spend my time on develop articles? Looks like I shoud'nt cause you again refer me to 1st and 2nd AfD which has no connection to my article if you take a look on the content. Sounds like I in wrong place. Sorry for WP:BLUDGEONING , but you just refer us to AfD (which is nonsense now) and evade do reviewer's work proreply. Antonio Vinzaretti ( talk ) 19:21, 20 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete and enhance with cobalt salt. Acknowledging our social policies, there still comes a time where patience wears thin . Let us not have a 4th nom for 5 and a half years. Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 13:35, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Citations 5, 16 and 30 are green, so considered reliable, but I'd only consider source 5 as extensive, non-PR text. Rest is about routine funding. All I can find are PR items. Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:51, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , just look at the two earlier AfD nominations. There are also a few reliable sources, but the rest are all promotional. HarukaAmaranth 春 香 16:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
European Football Coach of the Season: There are no authoritative sources about such an award from UEPS and AEJ. Mitte27 ( talk ) 17:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions . Mitte27 ( talk ) 17:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople , Lists of people , Awards , Football , and Europe . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 19:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football 's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete as hoax (G3). Giant Snowman 18:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:G3 Shouldn't have gone to AfD. Govvy ( talk ) 19:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment: It is also necessary to pay attention to similar cases of hoaxes based on Volodymyr VB materials: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Football Coach of the Year , Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UPI World Soccer Player of the Year Award , Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FIFA 70th anniversary retrospective awards . -- Mitte27 ( talk ) 06:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as a hoax. Joseph 2302 ( talk ) 07:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete – WP:G3 . Svartner ( talk ) 07:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Dr. Sri LakshmiSrinivasGuruji: Requires deletion . BLP issues. Fails WP:BIO . This is WP:ADMASQ 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete I'm unsure what this person does, making determination of notability difficult. Very PROMO and I find no sources about this person. Might even speedy delete for promotion. Oaktree b ( talk ) 12:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Two major instances of copyright violation have been detected and removed. There is barely enough left to form a stub. After redaction of the copyvios I doubt there is sufficient remaining to form an article. The second tranche was redacted post nomination. As nominator I would have no objection to a speedy deletion and close. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:30, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Eastfield (film): None of the sources seem to work, and I couldn't find anything online that would meet WP:NFSOURCES ARandomName123 ( talk ) 17:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom . ARandomName123 ( talk ) 17:20, 21 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Blatant hoax by a suspected sock of Cody Taylor. Murgatroyd49 ( talk ) 15:19, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Giaxul: Cheers, -- The Lonely Pather ( talk ) 08:53, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions . Owen× ☎ 09:06, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : pure fraud or neologism from editor with disruptive editing elsewhere ( Faxuliopa ). Klbrain ( talk ) 09:22, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete under criterion WP:A11 which I've now tagged accordingly. Clearly a made-up name. CycloneYoris talk! 09:24, 10 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Vineyard Workers Church (Dapodi): The only sources cited are a couple of articles describing the Pastor claiming that Coronavirus can be cured through 'special oil' and prayer. An utterly unencyclopaedic and promotional article entirely lacking in merit. AndyTheGrump ( talk ) 15:21, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and India . AndyTheGrump ( talk ) 15:21, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note : I realised after creating the AfD that the content is almost certainly a copyright violation, and have now nominated the article for speedy deletion, which may render this AfD unnecessary. AndyTheGrump ( talk ) 15:35, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations , Christianity , and Maharashtra . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:20, 10 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Navy Joan Roberts: She is known only as the out of wedlock daughter of the then drug addicted son of the US president. This article’s purpose appears to be an effort to somehow embarrass her father and grandfather, with her as collateral damage. The subject matter is already covered in the Hunter Biden article and need not be covered in an additional article about the young child. Fails WP:G10 WP:A7 WP:NBIO WP:GNG . O3000, Ret. ( talk ) 13:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Politics . O3000, Ret. ( talk ) 13:55, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . So a four-year-old child is suddenly notable and shamed because of the circumstances of her birth? WP:BLP1E applies here. This is borderline child abuse. WWGB ( talk ) 14:08, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is an appalling attack on a child with her entire life ahead of her. Needs to be deleted right now. SPECIFICO talk 14:24, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Quick delete Utterly inappropriate BLP, and coverage would only be appropriate within her father's article. Reywas92 Talk 14:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment Could be a brief mention in a Hunter Biden biography here, not needing a whole article. Oaktree b ( talk ) 14:59, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED , almost all coverage of her is in relation to Hunter Biden or Joe Biden. WikiVirus C (talk) 15:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete ASAP - whether you like or dislike Hunter and Joe Biden, don't drag a little girl into this. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 16:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per NBASIC and INVALIDBIO . The subject is a minor who has received coverage as a subject to a parental dispute. There's no relevant content that couldn't theoretically be mentioned in father's bio instead. Trout to the nominator for assuming bad faith about the article's purpose and for invoking G10 and A7. Politrukki ( talk ) 16:35, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete - and a trout to whoever created this page. This is totally inappropriate. What the fuck? — Isaidnoway (talk) 16:40, 12 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Chef Chioma: Being a wife of a notable person doesn't mean the wife should be notable. No! It's WP:INHERITED . Besides, celebrities can be influential but not notable. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 09:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Businesspeople , Women , Africa , and Nigeria . Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 09:01, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] del - thoroughly nonnotable. - Altenmann >talk 09:05, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : I've reviewed the article and understand the nominee's concerns. While Chef Chioma may be a notable figure in Nigeria, the article lacks sufficient reliable sources to establish their notability on a national or international level. The content is also quite brief and doesn't provide enough context or depth to meet Wikipedia's standards. Based on these factors, I support the deletion of the article. - 2RDD Talk🔊 10:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . Non-notable individual. Article was previously deleted via an AFD discussion in May 2024. Versace 1608 Wanna Talk ? 14:20, 26 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Sunnydale School: Not enough in-depth coverage about this school to show notability. Fails WP:GNG . আফতাবুজ্জামান ( talk ) 11:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education , Schools , and Bangladesh . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:25, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete. PROMO, non-notable school. The name is too common to try and find stuff about the school. Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:46, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete , no references cited in the article and the tone is blatantly promotional. I had difficulties finding significant coverage . Merko ( talk ) 18:20, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete as blatant advertising. QuicoleJR ( talk ) 20:10, 24 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete this is just an ad for the school and there are no references. Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝 ) 06:24, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Article seems to be an NOR promotional essay. I've placed a g11 speedy delete template on the article but if that's denied it's a pretty clear delete per all the reasons cited here. 69.92.163.38 ( talk ) 15:39, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete - Non-notable school, and article is transparently promotional. -- TheInsatiableOne ( talk ) 10:26, 25 April 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Emir Uyar: Under these circumstances, can we get a G4 check? -- Finngall talk 20:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Turkey . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete and salt , WP:G4 , looks like a promotional piece to me, drawing on from the content and persistent recreation. Aintabli ( talk ) 00:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] As pointed out below, "Emir Uyar" has already been salted, but I intended to support salting the title with the disambiguation, "Emir Uyar (businessman)", which was the initial name of this entry (used to circumvent salt). Aintabli ( talk ) 00:56, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete and salt , WP:G4 , bare notability and promotional piece. Infestor ( talk ) 08:56, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete but not salt – I don't think this article is promotional, and there is a hint of potential notability, but not just yet. G4 is not right here. There is a lot more coverage since 2017, and the past AfD had very little participation. TLA tlak 03:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete and salt , G4, no notability, it's PR. Tehonk ( talk ) 01:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: As noted above, it’s already salted, so calling for that is redundant—it may simply be that the admin who moved the article to the salted title didn’t check that the create-protection was in place prior to doing so. -- Finngall talk 05:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] well it should be taken as "keep salting" then :) Tehonk ( talk ) 08:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete as G4 and salting of the disambiguation. Killarnee ( talk ) 01:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom -- Devoke water 22:14, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
The Nile Fc: I can't find any evidence of WP:GNG being met and WP:V might even be a concern. Contrary to what the article says, they did not win the Egypt Cup in 2019. That would be quite remarkable if a team formed in 2015 and playing in the 4th tier did. I don't think that they even played in the qualifying rounds . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Egypt . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:38, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The article was previously tagged for speedy delete as the article was an exact copy and paste from an article about a different club so it's irrelevant. I don't follow sports but there aren't any sources referenced so it's highly possible that the information is incorrect. -- Cosmic6811 🍁 ( T · C ) 16:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Sagwal: I cannot move this back to draft without the AfD process. I am easy with returning this to draft, or with deleting it. However, the creating editor has now moved it twice to mainspace. There is a difficulty with the referencing: first they go Google Books. They ought, if independent and reliable, be found on one of many sales sites. I am having difficulty seeing how s the references used verify the claims made 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:14, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gollen unrelated except for the broad topic of the Ror, Same creating editor 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:16, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions . CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:58, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Haryana-related deletion discussions . CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:59, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Uttar Pradesh-related deletion discussions . CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:59, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions . CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:59, 24 September 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Suicide of Sammy Teusch: Clearly fulls under the purview of WP:BDP ("Such extensions would apply particularly to contentious or questionable material about the subject that has implications for their living relatives and friends, such as in the case of a possible suicide or particularly gruesome crime") and thus we should presume in favor of privacy. Sincerely, Dilettante 18:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . Same arguments as nom: WP:SUSTAINED , WP:NOTNEWS , and WP:BDP . There is no encyclopedic value in documenting this tragic situation. I saw mentions of the family pursuing a law, and perhaps someday a law will pass and be notable and in that context, a brief mention of the suicide that led to the law would be appropriate. He only died less than three weeks ago; if there is continuing coverage six months or a year from now, an article could be reconsidered. (I came across this article and its deletion nomination via WP:BLPN#Suicide of Sammy Teusch .) Schazjmd (talk) 18:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Indiana . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 18:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per NOTNEWS. If this is truly a historically-important event rather than a tragic blip on the radar, there will be plenty of time to build a proper, sourced article then, rather than relying upon ONEEVENT coverage of dubious caliber. Carrite ( talk ) 19:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , clear NOTNEWS. At a minimum, this is way WP:TOOSOON . Nomoskedasticity ( talk ) 19:32, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete This is tragic, obviously, but the nominator and the previous delete votes have clearly laid out the case for why Wikipedia should not have this article. Just Step Sideways from this world .... . today 19:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom. WP:BDP clearly and explicitly applies. AndyTheGrump ( talk ) 20:28, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment . Perhaps the notable event is the persistent failure of school administrators to do anything, let alone develop a coherent strategy to reduce bullying, rather than the suicide itself. The international coverage that the incident received suggests that there will be changes as a result, starting with some school district officials losing their jobs, and perhaps the proposed legislation being enacted. Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 22:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The international coverage looks to me like low-quality churnalism . Just Step Sideways from this world .... . today 23:44, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per nom and NOTNEWS, and BDP. Additionally, User:Tempelz should review all the policies and guidelines quoted here in this discussion, and take a look at WP:RSP for acceptable sources to use in any article . Isaidnoway (talk) 22:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I would also question the use of Inside Edition as a source, but oddly found basically no discusion of it in the WP:RSN archives. I was actually surprised to find it is still on the air, unlike A Current Affair and other 80's/90's tabloid infotainment shows. Just Step Sideways from this world .... . today 23:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] They have 282 edits total. I don't fault them for not realizing there were issues with the subject. Tempelz , while I would advise reading all the linked pages, it's a lot to take in and I won't fault you for not wanting to read everything. If you do decide to create pages in the future (and I hope you do), I'd recommend reading the general notability guideline , the notability guideline for athletes (particularly the sentence about boxers), and our policy on biographies of living or recently deceased persons . Most other policies and guidelines are unnecessary for now for the edits you do, but I encourage you to read more if you'd like to. If you ever need help, feel free to ask on my my talk page or on this forum for a speedier response. Sincerely, Dilettante 01:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment - If named legislation follows this, a solid Keep case can be made for an article combining the incident with the resulting law. But at this moment, this is clearly news reportage of a personal-level incident. Carrite ( talk ) 22:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Iff such legislation results, would agree a case could be made for "an article on the resulting law (with the incident as background information)". The difference being in the level of detail. Rotary Engine talk 22:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per nom, NOTNEWS, BDP. Endorse the advice of | speedy delete |
Seunzzy Sax: The artist has little notability and the sources are poor at best. 333fortheain ( talk ) 12:49, 28 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Taylor Parsons: The subject appears to be only barely notable and quite probably not notable at all (see comments on the talk page), and there was a previous discussion about deletion. The subject has transitioned and does not wish her current name - which is now the title of the article - to be associated with the name she was possibly notable under. WP:BIODELETE suggests that a request for deletion from a relatively unknown subject of a BLP should be respected. There must be many sportspeople who are equally notable who do not have Wikipedia pages. The entry is categorised as "Low importance" on the projects Australia and Climbing. I vote to delete Lijil ( talk ) 14:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3 ). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 July 30 . — cyberbot I Talk to my owner :Online 14:42, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Australia . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:04, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Yes, I also vote to delete. Taylorppp3 ( talk ) 22:05, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment . @Taylorppp3 has said that they represent the BLP subject on the article talk page , and that they would like to have the article deleted (hence the WP:BIODELETE in the nom). If the article is not deleted, then MOS:GENDERID applies (as the subject's notability was under their previous deadname of Chris Webb), which the subject would rather not be preserved. Aszx5000 ( talk ) 00:01, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment It looks like there's a consensus to delete - but if it were to be kept, maybe it could be renamed back to the deadname and not mention the person's current name. Lijil ( talk ) 17:48, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:BIODELETE . Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk ) 14:48, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as above — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk ) 18:13, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per request. This is a BLP. -- A. B. ( talk • contribs • global count ) 18:39, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions and has been listed on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk ) 20:48, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , for the reasons well articulated above. CT55555 ( talk ) 22:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Notability is borderline and WP:BIODELETE applies, note also that they are mentioned in other articles using their dead name. Theroadislong ( talk ) 06:08, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . For clarity, though this AfD is listed as the 2nd nomination, there was no previous AfD that I can find (either related to Taylor Parsons or the article pre-move under Parsons' birth name). There was a BLP prod in 2021, which was removed as it did not meet the BLP prod criteria . All that being said, while Parsons may technically be marginally notable, she is not particularly well-known and deleting her article under WP:BIODELETE seems reasonable. Caeciliusinhorto-public ( talk ) 13:20, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm the person who nominated, and I may have misunderstood the BLP prod - I thought that meant it had been nominated for deletion previously. Thanks for clarifying. Lijil ( talk ) 17:44, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Suyash Kumar: Gaismagorm ( talk ) 17:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People , Travel and tourism , and India . Gaismagorm ( talk ) 17:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Will Trafford: Sources 1 and 2 mention him and his resignation statement, but are largely about the resignation events and not him. 3 is a primary source summarizing his work, and 4 through 6 are articles he contributed to. Source 7 is a duplicate of 1 and 8 makes no mention of him. His resignation may merit a mention in the article on Whakaata Māori , but not a standalone BLP. Giraffer ( talk · contribs ) 09:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and New Zealand . Giraffer ( talk · contribs ) 09:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 11:52, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete . The promotional tone of the article and the fact that its creator made only 20 edits, 8 of which is related to this article, calls for WP:G11 . Delta space 42 ( talk • contribs ) 15:51, 19 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Muhammad Asyrof Al-Ghifari: Their sole accomplishment includes winning a local English-speaking competition and participating in a minor film project. Additionally, the article's existence is partly attributed to their relation to Zakaria, which is another reason for considering its removal under WP:BIOFAMILY . Ckfasdf ( talk ) 01:46, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers , Television , Law , and Indonesia . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 04:09, 11 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per nom. Xxanthippe ( talk ) 02:11, 12 March 2024 (UTC) . [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Bacon Cajun Ranch McCrispy: A BEFORE has shown no sources that establish it. —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 18:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions . —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 18:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to List_of_McDonald's_products#Bacon_Cajun_Ranch_McCrispy . Reywas92 Talk 19:54, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete a limited time fast food item has no place as a standalone article. -1ctinus📝 🗨 23:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong Delete or Redirect Limited time item with no analysis of cultural impact. Article is not ready. Evident to me that the user is currently just messing around on Wikipedia given edit summaries and uploads of images. -- Classicwiki ( talk ) If you reply here, please ping me . 05:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per 1ctinus and Classicwiki. Doubtful that the article creator's account will be around much longer. Wikishovel ( talk ) 06:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] And now the article's been speedy deleted G5. "I guess that concludes negotiations." Wikishovel ( talk ) 17:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
LNER Class A3 2506 Salmon Trout: The locomotive was not preserved and has no claim to notability in the article. This was created by a community-banned editor and is also eligible for deletion on that basis, see [46] . Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 16:29, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and United Kingdom . Trainsandotherthings ( talk ) 16:29, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to LNER Gresley Classes A1 and A3#Preservation . Regardless of notability, this is a short article and LNER Gresley Classes A1 and A3 can use the additional information. In other words, the AfDd article is an unjustified SPINOFF. gidonb ( talk ) 16:39, 21 December 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Philadelphia Office of Emergency Management: Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORGCRIT . AusLondonder ( talk ) 04:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Pennsylvania . AusLondonder ( talk ) 04:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Oppose - Let's try to make it better before deleting it. The OEM is a relatively new city agency and has had increased prominence recently due to events like the Delaware River chemical spill in 2023 and the 2023 wildfires , and other more localized emergencies. Unbandito ( talk ) 20:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No objection to improvement but we do need significant coverage in reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability. AusLondonder ( talk ) 06:58, 19 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 05:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Merge to Philadelphia#Public_safety as preferred WP:ATD . ~ Kvng ( talk ) 14:12, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] What content do you believe should be merged and where's the secondary source coverage to support it? Because at the moment the only source is a press release from the City of Philadelphia. AusLondonder ( talk ) 14:21, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:SECONDARY is definitely preferred and is required to establish notability. I am not arguing that this is an independently notable organization. WP:PRIMARY is acceptable for verification of a paragraph in a larger article. I would suggest merging this short article as a new section under Philadelphia#Public_safety . The content can then be improved in place by editors of the Philadelphia article. ~ Kvng ( talk ) 16:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I have to disagree, I think it's completely undue at the Philadelphia article. Without secondary sources we have no reason to believe this is a noteworthy organisation. I also absolutely oppose inserting irrelevant and unacceptable content at another article with the expectation someone else will "improve" it at some unknown time. AusLondonder ( talk ) 17:41, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Of course, you're free to disagree. However, I've proposed an WP:ATD (policy) and your response approaches WP:IDONTLIKEIT (argument to avoid). Your WP:UNDUE argument is also without merit as my proposed subsection would be smaller than the others existing there. ~ Kvng ( talk ) 21:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It seems you think WP:ATD prohibits actually deleting an article on a non-notable topic under any circumstances, ever. Really struggling to see how what I said is an instance of WP:IDONTLIKEIT which are arguments to avoid at deletion discussions. I'm raising legitimate sourcing and quality content concerns which you have completely ignored. AusLondonder ( talk ) 02:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm ignoring article quality issues because WP:NOTCLEANUP . ~ Kvng ( talk ) 14:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] That's a reason not to delete an entire article, not to insert new content in another article. I think this time you're really reaching trying to avoid deletion via ATD. AusLondonder ( talk ) 15:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , there is nothing suitable to merge. The two prose sentences were copied verbatim from the referenced PDF (page 74/76) at the article's creation . As far as I can tell from Copyright status of works by subnational governments of the United States#Pennsylvania and its ref , the PDF is copyrighted without a Wikipedia-compatible free license. Even if the copied text is not a copyright violation ( WP:Copyright violations , policy), the official OEM site should be preferred as a source because it is current, not ten years out of date. {{ Infobox government agency }} would be inappropriate detail in Philadelphia#Public safety . As AusLondonder commented above, a subsection for OEM of any length seems excessive, due to WP:WEIGHT (shortcut to WP:Neutral point of view#Due and undue weight , policy) considerations. The existing subsections have {{ Main }} templates linking to Philadelphia Police Department and Philadelphia Fire Department , respectively. Although WP:Be bold is a guideline, I recommend proposing the addition at Talk:Philadelphia first. Flatscan ( talk ) 04:31, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I'm not sure I buy these arguments but if I did, I think they would argue for a redirect to Philadelphia . That way the contents would be available to Philadelphia editors in the redirect's history. ~ Kvng ( talk ) 17:55, 27 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Always trying to scratch around for an "alternative" to deleting inappropriate content isn't necessary. Some content simply does not belong on Wikipedia. AusLondonder ( talk ) 14:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Kerry Xuefeng Chen: 虹易 ( talk ) 15:45, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople , Environment , Technology , Internet , and China . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 16:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ 虹易 Do you have any further arguments towards deletion besides association? While it certainly needs work, the article seems okay at a glance from an inclusion standpoint. Aaron Liu ( talk ) 21:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : The article has been moved to draft space deleted per G5 . @ 虹易 : The nominator may consider withdrawing and speedy keeping this discussion per WP:CSK #1, as the subject article no longer exists. — Prince of Erebor （ The Book of Mazarbul ） 18:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Prince of Erebor Was it moved to draftspace or entirely deleted? I wanted to look at it more... Aaron Liu ( talk ) 22:47, 3 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Aaron Liu : Ah, my mistake. The page has already been deleted by CactusWriter, instead of being moved to draftspace. I guess you have to request for undeletion if you would like to continue working on the page. — Prince of Erebor （ The Book of Mazarbul ） 04:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Michael Quatrini: I find no sourcing for this person. Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:31, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Florida . Oaktree b ( talk ) 18:31, 27 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Bridge India: Can't find any reliable or independent sources. Page was previously deleted as well. 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 18:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions . 𝓡𝔂𝓭𝓮𝔁 18:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
DJ D. Pewee: Unknown-Tree🌲? ( talk ) 02:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians , Music , and Liberia . Unknown-Tree🌲? ( talk ) 02:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Strong delete , did not win awards claimed, nothing popping up for this guy at all. Mach61 05:34, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not to be confused with Anderson . Paak's alter-ego, DJ Pee . Wee, this fellow has nothing for him. Could not verify that he won the awards listed. Why? I Ask ( talk ) 09:06, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:30, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DDP DJ Dominic Pewe€ DJ D P and other discussions. Long-term abuse. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:31, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Bir Uttam Shaheed Samad School and College: Appears to be a promo article for a secondary school for children of military personnel, mainly unsourced. BEFORE found promo, listings, routine mill news, nothing that meets WP:SIRS addressing the subject directly and indepth // Timothy :: talk 05:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] AfD from May 2023: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bir Uttam Shaheed Samad School and College , I can't see the original, but it may meet G4, based on the below, I've have G11'd it. This is a official paid work by the institution and I have made by the institution order and this article represents a college in bangladesh. It is not a fake article. If anyone has trouble to believe it then you can visit the official website of the college and you can also check the Bengali Wikipedia, the college also has an article in the Bengali Wikipedia. The institution offered me to make an English article of it. So I think It should not be deleted from wikipedia. This article is made with real sources. -Thank you Ahsan26 ( talk ) 05:46, 25 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
2024 North Las Vegas shooting: Given the number of fatalities, it could be notable if there was sustained coverage, but I don't see evidence of this. ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 21:14, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime , Firearms , and Nevada . Pbritti ( talk ) 21:14, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Pinging Johannes Maximilian as the editor who declined the draft. ~ Pbritti ( talk ) 21:18, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] It was. I did it because of the number of fatalities and because it expanded beyond a domestic violence shooting, which aren't exactly uncommon in the United States. Raskuly ( talk ) 22:35, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Well, there's no coverage in Gnews, at all. I don't even see what's in the article online, meaning it's been buried by other sources... This is not a notable event with no lasting notability. Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Fine, can I just have my article deleted already? Raskuly ( talk ) 02:32, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete per WP:NOTNEWS . Mass shootings are awful but are an everyday occurrence, and not every one automatically warrants an article. 💥 Casualty • Hop along. • 01:09, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Fine, can I just have my article deleted already? Raskuly ( talk ) 02:32, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 03:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
V. Y. Bezel: I was thinking of doing speedy deletion but decided against it as someone might feel as if the article could be expanded upon. Gaismagorm ( talk ) 19:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions . Gaismagorm ( talk ) 19:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete - I intended to create a draft, but made a mistake on the namespace. Note [37] . I'll keep working on the article in Draft from now onwards, this article can be deleted. -- Soman ( talk ) 20:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete : The author requested to delete it and confirmed that he created a draft. Grab Up - Talk 11:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete per G7 as the original author requested its deletion. Duke of New Gwynedd ( talk | contrib. ) 13:53, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I agree, it needs to be deleted Cowinatree ( talk ) 11:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Let the author work on it as asked. Vajzë Blu ( talk ) 23:37, 16 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] This is filling no purpose, I believe speedy delete is right decision for this article. UNeditx ( talk ) 13:30, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Just to clarify, I've already created a draft at Draft:V. Y. Bezel . -- Soman ( talk ) 13:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] No other information is here about the subject, and so I think that speedy delete is a good idea for this page. Þórir vestan ( talk ) 18:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Redirect to Vladimir Bezel , since that page has now been created and this title is a plausible redirect to it. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk ) 19:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete since the author requested it and the page for Vladimir Bezel now exists. Uncreative172 ( talk ) 15:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Nashruddin Zakaria: Attempted to PROD but blocked by IP editor (possibly sock/blocked editor) Ckfasdf ( talk ) 06:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and Indonesia . Owen× ☎ 07:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : He worked as a civil servant and gave a speech in public, once. I don't see notability. This reads more like a family history project, with more details about his lineage than his actual accomplishments. Oaktree b ( talk ) 15:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Conserve Italia: As written, violates WP:NOTADVERT and would require WP:TNT even if sources are found. Current sources do not meet WP:NCORP . A quick WP:BEFORE shows a lot of routine coverage, nothing that would meet WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:SIRS . — siro χ o 04:17, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Italy . — siro χ o 04:20, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Witchcraft (diabolic): Treybien2 , 21:57 21 July 2023 ( talk ) (UTC) Oppose - This article was made from material copied from witchcraft , so it makes sense that there would be significant duplication in a page that's existed for less than 24 hours. Discussion in an ongoing move request for the Witchcraft page indicates that page is or should be a perfectly good WP:BROADCONCEPT and is not WP:UNBALANCED or biased . If that's true there should be space for these two articles to develop clear differences. Darker Dreams ( talk ) 05:06, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : For a greater appreciation of the context of this article's creation, please read Talk:Witchcraft#Systemic bias . This is not an endorsement of either side of ongoing arguments. Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 06:46, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete: It's not a virtual duplicate; it is a duplicate, seemingly aimed at avoiding/circumventing actual discussion and community consensus on the home page, making it plain old disruptive editing and a candidate for WP:A10 . Also this page was created without the proper AfD template, so it isn't currently an actually properly functioning AfD, just a page with an AfD title. Just a mess really. Iskandar323 ( talk ) 09:01, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Is it a plausible redirect to Witchcraft ? Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 09:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment I have contested the speedy delete. Despite that, I do hope that the AfD is repaired. I can only guess why you're making accusations that I'm "avoiding/circumventing actual discussion and community consensus on the home page" and "plain old disruptive editing." But, what I am doing is moving forward based on the direction it appears consensus is evolving. The discussion indicates an opinion that the existing page as an unbiased, broad concept - which would mean there's additional information to cover in a separate article. If there's not additional information and that page is unduly focused on this subject, this page should absolutely be deleted and the other moved to an appropriate name. Darker Dreams ( talk ) 09:45, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Would it not have been sensible to discuss the scope prior to creating a duplicate page? Iskandar323 ( talk ) 10:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] NB: The AfD template was fixed at 13:29 22 July by NinjaRobotPirate here . Iskandar323 ( talk ) 15:29, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Apply A10 . — Alalch E. 19:58, 22 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Maarten Nagtegaal: Fram ( talk ) 13:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Netherlands . Fram ( talk ) 13:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Non-notable individual, there is zero coverage for him. He appears to be the son of a rich person, which isn't enough for notability. Oaktree b ( talk ) 13:34, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete . Completely irrelevant non-notable figure. ULPS ( talk ) 14:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , non-notable figure. Creator claims that the information comes from knowing him personally (see talk). Schminnte ( talk • contribs ) 16:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment . This might be a different person with the same name. Also probably a different person: This . The corresponding article in the Dutch Wikipedia has been deleted. Twice. Eastmain ( talk • contribs ) 22:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete almost a speedy for an unreferenced BLP. LibStar ( talk ) 01:35, 31 May 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete since cyber harassment of a lving person. Admin assistance appreciated! gidonb ( talk ) 19:16, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Teleperformance Philippines: Teleperformance is noteworthy but already has its own article. No need to create a new one for its subsidiaries also. Gnkgr ( talk ) 00:13, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Philippines . Hey man im josh ( talk ) 00:20, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Clearly PROMO. Bullet points of business accomplishments with no real discussion around why they're important. Oaktree b ( talk ) 04:11, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete , clearly promotional, falls under G11. Fails WP:NPOV Brachy 08 (Talk) 04:19, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Fails WP:NCORP and written in a highly promotional tone . Kpg jhp jm 04:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I also noticed that the person who created this is probs a member of Teleperformance Philippines. Brachy 08 (Talk) 06:08, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Qualifies for G11 speedy as pure promo that would need to fully be rewritten. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:48, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete --- Tito Pao ( talk ) 12:37, 28 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete , should have qualified under G11 and G12 a long time ago (see relevant entry here ). Teleperformance's operations plus CSR programs (if any) in the Philippines can be mentioned in the Teleperformance article. - Ian Lopez @ 14:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : WP:G11 . ThisIsSeanJ ( talk ) 04:40, 30 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Ugh. Strictly speaking we don't have a CSD for blatant UPE that's been stubified to have no content and I can't find anything that isn't more likely a backwards copy but I'm going to tag it for G11 and the user page draft as G7 and U5. Speedy delete , snow. Alpha3031 ( t • c ) 13:49, 2 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Marvín A. Santana: WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 02:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete , same as with Marvín Sántana , Marvin A. Santana , and Marvin Amparo Santana ... Hatman31 ( talk ) 15:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Ayaz Sheikh: Deletion cannot be done via WP:G4 as the page was already speedy-deleted previously, hence the second AfD. Broc ( talk ) 20:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Pakistan . Broc ( talk ) 20:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Courtesy pings to ThaddeusSholto who tagged the page for speedy deletion and to Cactus.man who correctly declined the nomination. Broc ( talk ) 20:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Quick question, 'cos this is a new one for me - where's the rule that a page can't be speedied more than once? I looked, couldn't find... Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 04:53, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Alexandermcnabb : Pages can be speedied more than once, but not if they've been tagged as G4 , where it says: This criterion also does not cover content undeleted via a deletion review, or that was only deleted via proposed deletion (including deletion discussions closed as "soft delete") or speedy deletion. Though it only applies to pages that are tagged under the G4 criterion, and not to other types of speedy criteria. CycloneYoris talk! 05:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] @ CycloneYoris : See, I read that as 'if it has only been deleted via speedy and then restored then it can't be G4 but would have to go to AfD' rather than 'If it has ever been speedied and subsequently gone to AfD it can't be speedied again', which seems more logical to me.. . ie: AfD is sovereign... Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 06:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Less than a week later? Still nothing notable, found. SALT as well Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment : Same user Syed Shaveer that's re-created this article again, that was very passionate about the last AfD discussion... Somewhat worrysome. Oaktree b ( talk ) 21:21, 27 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Good GRIEF. Delete and SALT with extreme prejudice, fire, silver bullets, garlic. I'd propose blocking the author for disruption, and all. Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk ) 04:46, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt per above. Author should at least be warned for disruptive editing, and to stop recreating pages that have just been deleted. CycloneYoris talk! 05:36, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete and salt , and some sort of remedy against article creator per Alexandermcnabb and CycloneYoris. Wikishovel ( talk ) 06:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. | speedy delete |
Namaste Henry: Un assiolo ( talk ) 21:19, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising , Companies , and India . Un assiolo ( talk ) 21:19, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete : Not meeting corporate notability, I can only find a database listing [9] , their Linkedin and an Imdb profile for some reason. Oaktree b ( talk ) 22:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions . WC Quidditch ☎ ✎ 05:55, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete A7, G11, G5, take your pick. It's spam for an unremarkable company, by this week's sockpuppet of Btw Santhosh, and mainly sourced as usual with Santhosh's dire news-skinned blogs. Wikishovel ( talk ) 12:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] I would think "India's largest advertising company" disqualifies it from A7 (though it might not actually be true), and there is some non-advert content, disqualifying it from G11. If it really is a sockpuppet, then of course G5 applies. I was not aware of any alleged sockpuppetry which is why I nominated it at AfD instead of requesting speedy deletion. -- Un assiolo ( talk ) 19:37, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] WP:A7 would apply in my opinion, because the claim of "India's largest advertising company" is simply not credible. But I didn't mean to criticise you for bringing it to AFD: that was a perfectly valid action based on your assumptions. Wikishovel ( talk ) 19:42, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Only promotional content is there. ☆★ Sanjeev Kumar ( talk ) 14:22, 12 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete : Obviously promotional content per G11. Haruka Amaranth 02:33, 13 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy Delete per above. — Yahya ( talk • contribs. ) 21:42, 14 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete as per the nom Master rollo ( talk ) 18:15, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Delete Nothing I can locate meets GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing ++ 20:55, 15 July 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Capital Q Ventures: ~ Dictionary ( chat ) 14:39, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] About to tag it with G11 but you took my words out. Speedy delete as promotional. Toadette ( Let's talk together! ) 14:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Sorry @ ToadetteEdit . I will tag it for G11. ~ Dictionary ( chat ) 14:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] What can I do, to make it not promotional. My client wants Wikipedia page for his company Article - Gregory Romano ( talk ) 14:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete as promo. ~ Eejit43 ( talk ) 14:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] Speedy delete as a promo, because uh yeah Jesus, that page plus the admission of guilt here Claire 26 ( talk ) 14:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |
Ajit Singh Bhati: One source is the book of an academic named Javaid Rahi , who is not independent because he is a Gujjar academic who only writes praise in his publications. Second, it is unknown whether these kings existed or were imaginary. Some such articles were created in the last two to three days using the Gazetteer as a source, but there is no mention of these names in it. This nomination is also for: Dargahi Singh Bhati Shambhujit Singh Bhati . You can see a short discussion here on my talk. DreamRimmer ( talk ) 17:00, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India . Hey man im josh ( talk ) 17:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Hello,@ DreamRimmer @ Hey man im josh I have made some improvement and I have putt many references from independent sources/ Reliable sources written by various different writers please check the article pages that you have taged for deletions including Dargahi Singh Bhati , Shambhujit Singh Bhati , and Ajit Singh Bhati . I think these articles do not meet the criteria for deletion, as many reliable sources have already been added. أسامة بن عبد الله وليد ( talk ) 18:34, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] I can't see anything significant in these sources either. DreamRimmer ( talk ) 03:30, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ DreamRimmer Okay, sir, no problem. I'll always try to do my best, and other editors can also do their best. But if you think your first claim has not been cleared, as you said such characters are imaginary first, and you also said these pages are entirely based on the work of Javaid Rahi, I have already cleared these claims by putting more than 4 to 5 references from independent and reliable sources, so there should be no more excuses because such sources have been written by different writers that have nothing to do with these characters, so such claims do not meet the criteria for deletions of the articles of Dargahi Singh Bhati , Shambujit Singh Bhati , and Ajit Singh Bhati . أسامة بن عبد الله وليد ( talk ) 19:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ Spiderone @ أسامة بن عبد الله وليد @ Scottywong Oppose the deletions Request = Do not meet the criteria for deletion as this page has multiple primary sources and secondary sources exist on the article pages of Dargahi Singh Bhati and Ajit Singh Bhati and shambhujit Singh Bhati . 103.172.167.25 ( talk ) 17:01, 24 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Struck sock ! vote. Abecedare ( talk ) 17:23, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History , Royalty and nobility , Hinduism , Haryana , and Uttar Pradesh . Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:42, 14 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Info - Note to closer for soft deletion : This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum . There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. Logs : 2023-06 ✍️ create -- Cewbot ( talk ) 00:02, 22 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Scotty Wong — 05:48, 23 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep all : Now that sources have been added verifying that they really existed, they are presumed to be notable per Wikipedia:POLITICIAN . -- StellarHalo ( talk ) 07:37, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Comment – Dadri is wrongly mentioned as a princely state in the three articles, although it was an estate. And the subject of this AfD (Ajit Singh) was its muqarraridār , i.e. he occupied it by paying a fixed revenue rate to the British. As of now, Dirk H. A. Kolff 's source is the sole reliable source cited in these three articles. It has nontrivial coverage about Ajit Singh Bhati , but Shambhujit Singh Bhati and Dargahi Singh Bhati have a combined coverage of around 5 lines in it ( see p. 149 ). So it seems these two don't need standalone articles and should be covered in some other article. Maybe for now a paragraph about the Dadri estate can be added in Dadri#History where both of them can also be covered/redirected. The Kolff's source doesn't mention their surname as Bhati. So all three pages are needed to be renamed as well. Some details about Javed Rahi's unreliable book The Javaid Rahi's source is cited in all three articles. But it is edited by Javaid Rahi, a Gurjar activist who specialises in Kashmiri languages. So he is not even a historian. More importantly, the author (Rana Ali Hussan Chouhan) of the cited pages was not even a scholar. He was a civil engineer belonging to the Gurjar caste himself. So this is a non-scholarly and non-HISTRS source, which is not reliable for history-related details. BTW, the details of the author (Chauhan) are mainly available on Gurjar promo sites , although his nephew also mentions in this interview that Chauhan was a civil engineer in Pakistan Public Works Department . Note that the 400-plus pages of Rahi's book, i.e. pp. 243–728 , are authored by this Gurjar engineer. As expected from a nonscholar, the content is full of fringe theories, e.g. Kolff's source mentions (on page no. 151 ) that the subject of this AfD (Ajit Singh) died in 1812: " On 4 October 1812, Rao Ajit Singh died without issue. " But as per Chauhan (see page no. 590 ), Ajit Singh took part in the Indian Rebellion of 1857 : " Raja Ajit Singh had a vast territory but he was not granted a ‘Treaty Pact’ so Bhatis revolted vociferously in 1857. Consequently Raja Ajit Singh died fighting. " The rest of the sources are century-old unreliable gazetteers authored by British Raj officers or the nonscholarly government documents which plagiarise those gazetteers. None of them are reliable for history-related details – see WP:RAJ , WP:SCHOLARSHIP , WP:HISTRS . In short, Ajit Singh Bhati seems notable, but Shambhujit Singh Bhati and Dargahi Singh Bhati should be redirected. Note that this observation is mainly based on the cited sources of the three articles and I have yet to make an independent search about the subjects. - NitinMlk ( talk ) 22:22, 29 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Rebuttal to NitinMlk's analysis of sources from أسامة بن عبد الله وليد and tangents about other articles signed, Rosguill talk 04:11, 8 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. Oppose the false claim @ NitinMlk I do respect your concern, but first of all, These articles are largely dependent on independent sources written by different writers, not on Javed Rahi's or Rana Ali Hassan Chauhan's. The second thing is that where Dargahi Singh Bhati and Shambu Singh (Shambhujit Singh) are mentioned as bhati, they are also clearly mentioned in the Quotes given from the citations. And also go and check; there are many references that Dadri's rulers were Bhati Gujjar and Bhati Gujjar clan clearly mentioned in the Quotes given from the citations, and I am the creator of Ajit Singh Bhati (also known as Rao Jit Singh Bhati) and Shambujit Singh Bhati (Also known as Shambu Singh) Singh Bhati's pages. So it's a wrong claim that Dadri's rulers were not Bhati Gujjar's second statements regarding Javaid Rahi or Rana Ali Hassan Chauhan because their references are not mentioned as first sources in the body of the article. If you have some problems with the Citations given by Javaid Rahi's book, Can be removed, but Bhati Gujjar is clearly mentioned by many independent historians. but if you have some issues why These characters mentioned as Bhati Gujjar go and read the Quote given from Refrences and also try to read these Refrences some are free or some are paid where Rulers of Dadri estate or Dadri's rulers clearly mentioned as Bhati Gujjar. Thank you so much for leaving your concern and being kind. ✝️✝️🕊️ Have a nice day Brother @ NitinMlk . أسامة بن عبد الله وليد ( talk ) 04:00, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] أسامة بن عبد الله وليد , you misunderstood my comment. All three subjects were of course Gurjars belonging to the Bhati clan. I didn't even contest that fact. My comment was about WP:COMMONNAME , which simply means that if most of the reliable sources refer to the subject of this article as, let's say, Rao Ajit Singh, then that will be the Wikipedia article's title. BTW, Kolff's source refers to him as Rao Ajit Singh, which also seems like his WP:COMMONNAME. - NitinMlk ( talk ) 21:40, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L iz Read! Talk! 05:13, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Duplicate ! votes, more arguments about other articles signed, Rosguill talk 04:11, 8 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. Oppose @ Liz @ NitinMlk First of all, there is not a single reference. From the work of Rana Ali Hassan Chauhan, then why have you mentioned his work? The second thing is that, According to your claim, Dadri was not a princely state but an estate. Does it matter or meet the criteria for deliberation? Instead of providing any reliable source, you just try to make lame excuses by talking about Rana Ali Hassan Chauhan, even though there is not a single citation from his book and his books are not reachable digitally. You also talk about redirecting these pages to the Dadri town article, but why? Why not write a new article on Dadri estate or Dadri princely state in the future by citing reliable sources? You also claimed that Dirk H.A. Kolff just talked about Bhatti Gujjar in six lines. That's not the truth. I am leaving the Reference to Dirk H.A. Kolff. Book go and Read carefully. He talked about Dadri's rulers as Bhatti Gujjar, and he also talked about Dargahi Singh Bhati , Ajit Singh Bhati , and Shambujit Singh Bhati see this Reference on pages 138, 148, 461, 462, and 641. [a] 103.191.123.67 ( talk ) 08:49, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Struck sock ! vote. Abecedare ( talk ) 17:23, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Firstly, you mentioned that Rana Ali Hassan Chauhan is not cited in the articles in question. But that's not true, as he is cited in all three articles even now: see Ajit Singh Bhati's ref no. 4 and 6 ; Shambhujit Singh Bhati's ref no. 4 and 7 ; and Dargahi Singh Bhati's ref no. 4 . All of them cite page no. 589 and/or page no. 590 , which are authored by Rana Ali Hassan Chauhan. Secondly, I never " claimed that Dirk H.A. Kolff just talked about Bhatti Gujjar in six lines. " I mentioned that Kolff's source " has nontrivial coverage about Ajit Singh Bhati, but Shambhujit Singh Bhati and Dargahi Singh Bhati have a combined coverage of around 5 lines in it (see p. 149). " Thirdly, Dadri was never a princely state . So I pointed out that mistake, as estates and princely states are two different things. You can read princely state to know more about it. Fourthly, I mentioned, " Maybe for now a paragraph about the Dadri estate can be added in Dadri#History where both of them can also be covered/redirected. " But of course if a well-sourced article about Dadri estate is created in the future, then these two subjects can be covered there. Finally, please don't reply without reading my previous and this comment very carefully. Thanks. - NitinMlk ( talk ) 21:52, 30 June 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] @ NitinMlk •1st Dear brother you're not trying to understand the base of our conversation. First of all you're absolutely wrong and not using Comman sense that any refrences from the work of Rana Ali Hassan chauhan not mentioned in any citations at all. Brother do your research and home work again clear your confusion first or provide solid proofs that any writer mentioned in their books that they're writing about these characters by considering first refrences from the work of Rana Ali Hassan chauhan simple. • 2nd thing is that all your false claims now have clear because Raj Era sources all I have removed. • 3rd claim That Dadri's rulers never mentioned as bhatti this claim Also proven wrong and this article not dependent on the work of Javaid Rahi and Rana Ali Hassan chauhan totally wrong claim without any mention of these writers in the books of Dirk H.A Kolff or other Writers as refrences. • 4th thing is that you totally try to manipulate the conversation by putting small excuses like oh! This was not a princely state but a Estate okay no problem but this small excuses can not meet the criteria for deletions. • 5th read your previous comment again you said Dirk H.A Kolff only talk in 6 lines I have mentioned 5 to 6 pages where Dirk Kolf clearly mentioned about Dargahi Singh Bhati and Bhati Gujjar clan and Rulers of Dadri as Bhati same things also have done by all other historians. • 6th Go and read citation research again Not any author of these books Used Rana Ali Hassan chauhan's work as first sources or they don't even talk or mentioned the name of Rana Ali Hassan chauhan. • 7th thing is that it is not necessary to put In Dadri's town article about Dadri estate of Bhati Gujjar and by saying that you also point out that these two pages Dargahi Singh or Shambu Singh should redirect to Dargahi's town article at what bases brother? . You said because these two characters don't have Coverage in dirk Kolf or other's work you're wrong I have mentioned 6 pages from Dirk H.A Kolff's Book he talked about Dargahi Singh Bhati also Shambu Singh bhati Even he talked about Rao Roshan Singh Bhati but the link that I have provided is a paid work of Dirk H.A Kolff we can not entirely get access to his work without paying. •8th Dadri's was an independent state established by Dargahi Singh Bhati, Ruled by Rao Roshan Singh Bhati, Umrao Singh Bhati, shambujit Singh Bhati, Amra Singh Bhati they all belonged to one monarchy and one family of Bhati Gujjar clan. Refrences given in the article will decided such characters have more or less coverage. Brother Your lame excuses like Dargahi Singh or Ajit Singh Bhati never signed a treaty with britishers etc and They paid tribute to Britishers such excuses are irrelevant here and Dadri was a princely state or just a estate also doesn't matter here. Totally irrelevant to the topic of Deletions discussion. • 9th thing you should have to accept the fact that your claims like Dadri's rulers never mentioned as bhatti have already cleared, Britishers never Singh a treaty, these pages dependent on Javaid Rahi or Rana Ali Hassan chauhan's work also proven wrong, shambu singh Bhati and Dargahi Singh Bhati don't have Coverage also proven wrong by the given refrences and RAJ Era sources triggered you so I have removed all. Brother I am leaving best wishes and love for you and also mentioning the articles of Umrao Singh Bhati , Dargahi Singh Bhati , Shambhujit Singh Bhati , and Ajit Singh Bhati these 4 Rulers belonged to one monarchy one Gujjar family of Bhati clan. Amra Singh Bhati , Roshan Singh Bhati and some other Rulers from this monarchy have not yet any articles. Have nice day 😊 brother before claims must bring solid proofs! . @ Liz @ StellarHalo @ Scottywong أسامة بن عبد الله وليد ( talk ) 01:06, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] see Ajit Singh Bhati's ref no. 4 and 6; Shambhujit Singh Bhati's ref no. 4 and 7; and Dargahi Singh Bhati's ref no. 4. All of them cite page no. 589 and/or page no. 590, which are authored by Rana Ali Hassan Chauhan. You're absolutely wrong here. If Javaid Rahi in his book or any other writer doesn't even talk about Rana Ali Hassan Chauhan's work/book or doesn't even mention at the bottom line of the page that these references they take from the work\Book of Rana Ali Hassan Chauhan, then on what basis are you wasting your time, Brother? Please don't reply, brother, if you don't have any solid proof that any writer mentioned that they're talking on behalf of Rana Ali Hassan Chauhan's work. Simply use Coman Sense. أسامة بن عبد الله وليد ( talk ) 01:16, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] No need to ping me. This is just one of hundreds of AFDs that are open right now. What we really need is to hear from other editors. You've said your peace, let others weigh in. This is a process of consensus building, not which editor can be the most persistent. L iz Read! Talk! 07:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Note to closer : I have blocked أسامة بن عبد الله وليد for a week for abusive sockpuppetry and struck two oppose ! votes they cast while logged out ( WP:DUCK ). Abecedare ( talk ) 17:23, 1 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Draftify per the current state of the article. Chamaemelum ( talk ) 03:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Let's have a relist not overwhelmed by walls of text from a sockpuppet Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 04:05, 8 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Keep all : As the additional sources that have been added since the article's creation, making sure that they truly fulfil the criteria for Notability and should be included there at main space. Good Faith أسامة بن عبد الله وليد ( talk ) 09:27, 11 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I don't see any consensus here. But, speaking as an uninvolved bystander, perhaps a move to Draft space would alleviate some concerns about sourcing. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L iz Read! Talk! 05:08, 15 July 2023 (UTC) [ reply ] The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review ). No further edits should be made to this page. | speedy delete |