Case ID
stringlengths 8
10
| Case Name
stringlengths 21
57
| Date
stringlengths 10
10
| Court
stringclasses 1
value | Judges
stringlengths 22
35
| Legal Principles
stringlengths 25
104
| Summary
stringlengths 45
224
| Judgment Text
stringlengths 20
103
| Citations
float64 | Outcome
stringlengths 12
53
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
913/2022 | Indian Bank vs. State of Tamil Nadu | 20-04-2022 | Supreme Court of India | N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari | Banking regulations and compliance. Microfinance norms and penalties. | The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with microfinance norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. | The penalties were upheld. | null | Penalties upheld. |
914/2022 | Central Bank of India vs. State of Kerala | 25-05-2022 | Supreme Court of India | S.A. Bobde, A.S. Bopanna | Banking regulations and compliance. Internal control norms and penalties. | The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with internal control norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. | The penalties were upheld. | null | Penalties upheld. |
914/2022 | ABC Industries vs. Union of India | 01-03-2022 | Supreme Court of India | N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant | Industrial dispute and labor law compliance. | The petitioner challenged the labor law compliance requirements. The Supreme Court upheld the requirements. | Compliance requirements were upheld. | null | Requirements upheld. |
915/2022 | Yes Bank vs. State of Telangana | 30-06-2022 | Supreme Court of India | A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan | Banking regulations and compliance. Payment gateway norms and penalties. | The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with payment gateway norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. | The penalties were upheld. | null | Penalties upheld. |
915/2022 | State of Gujarat vs. XYZ Ltd. | 05-03-2022 | Supreme Court of India | A.M. Khanwilkar, B.R. Gavai | Environmental law and corporate responsibility. | The case involved a dispute over environmental pollution. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state. | The corporation was held responsible. | null | Corporation held responsible. |
916/2022 | IndusInd Bank vs. State of Andhra Pradesh | 05-07-2022 | Supreme Court of India | R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha | Banking regulations and compliance. Capital adequacy norms and penalties. | The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with capital adequacy norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. | The penalties were upheld. | null | Penalties upheld. |
916/2022 | DEF Bank vs. State of Maharashtra | 10-03-2022 | Supreme Court of India | U.U. Lalit, Hemant Gupta | Banking regulations and customer rights. | The petitioner challenged banking fees. The Supreme Court upheld the fees. | Banking fees were upheld. | null | Fees upheld. |
917/2022 | Dhanlaxmi Bank vs. State of Jharkhand | 10-08-2022 | Supreme Court of India | S.A. Nazeer, Hemant Gupta | Banking regulations and compliance. Credit risk management norms and penalties. | The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with credit risk management norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. | The penalties were upheld. | null | Penalties upheld. |
917/2022 | GHI Corporation vs. Employees Union | 15-03-2022 | Supreme Court of India | D.Y. Chandrachud, Hima Kohli | Employment law and workers' rights. | The case involved a dispute over employee benefits. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the employees. | Employee benefits were granted. | null | Benefits granted. |
918/2022 | Karnataka Bank vs. State of Odisha | 15-09-2022 | Supreme Court of India | N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari | Banking regulations and compliance. Operational risk management norms and penalties. | The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with operational risk management norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. | The penalties were upheld. | null | Penalties upheld. |
918/2022 | State of Karnataka vs. PQR Constructions | 20-03-2022 | Supreme Court of India | R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha | Contract law and state contracts. | The petitioner challenged contract termination. The Supreme Court upheld the termination. | Contract termination was upheld. | null | Termination upheld. |
919/2022 | Federal Bank vs. State of Assam | 20-10-2022 | Supreme Court of India | S.A. Bobde, A.S. Bopanna | Banking regulations and compliance. Liquidity management norms and penalties. | The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with liquidity management norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. | The penalties were upheld. | null | Penalties upheld. |
919/2022 | LMN Enterprises vs. State of Rajasthan | 25-03-2022 | Supreme Court of India | A.S. Bopanna, Hrishikesh Roy | Corporate taxation and state taxes. | The petitioner challenged state tax assessment. The Supreme Court upheld the assessment. | Tax assessment was upheld. | null | Assessment upheld. |
920/2022 | City Union Bank vs. State of Tripura | 25-11-2022 | Supreme Court of India | A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari | Banking regulations and compliance. Customer service norms and penalties. | The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with customer service norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. | The penalties were upheld. | null | Penalties upheld. |
920/2022 | OPQ Ltd. vs. State of Tamil Nadu | 30-03-2022 | Supreme Court of India | S. Abdul Nazeer, Krishna Murari | Land acquisition and compensation. | The petitioner challenged land compensation amount. The Supreme Court revised the compensation. | Compensation was revised. | null | Compensation revised. |
921/2019 | Punjab National Bank vs. State of Rajasthan | 30-08-2019 | Supreme Court of India | S. Abdul Nazeer, Sanjiv Khanna | Banking fraud and liability. Bank's duty of care towards customers. | The bank challenged a ruling holding it liable for a fraudulent transaction. The Supreme Court upheld the liability, emphasizing the bank's duty of care towards its customers. | The bank was held liable and directed to compensate the affected customers. | null | Liability upheld; compensation ordered. |
921/2022 | State of Punjab vs. JKL Industries | 05-04-2022 | Supreme Court of India | M.R. Shah, Aniruddha Bose | Industrial safety and state regulations. | The case involved a dispute over safety regulations. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state. | Safety regulations were upheld. | null | Regulations upheld. |
922/2022 | South Indian Bank vs. State of Arunachal Pradesh | 05-01-2022 | Supreme Court of India | R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha | Banking regulations and compliance. Financial inclusion norms and penalties. | The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with financial inclusion norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. | The penalties were upheld. | null | Penalties upheld. |
922/2022 | STU Corporation vs. Union of India | 10-04-2022 | Supreme Court of India | Ashok Bhushan, Vineet Saran | Corporate law and regulatory compliance. | The petitioner challenged regulatory compliance costs. The Supreme Court upheld the costs. | Compliance costs were upheld. | null | Costs upheld. |
923/2022 | Lakshmi Vilas Bank vs. State of Sikkim | 10-02-2022 | Supreme Court of India | S.A. Nazeer, Hemant Gupta | Banking regulations and compliance. Financial stability norms and penalties. | The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with financial stability norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. | The penalties were upheld. | null | Penalties upheld. |
923/2022 | State of Haryana vs. XYZ Bank | 15-04-2022 | Supreme Court of India | Indira Banerjee, V. Ramasubramanian | Banking fraud and state oversight. | The case involved a banking fraud dispute. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state. | The bank was held accountable. | null | Bank accountable. |
924/2022 | DEF Ltd. vs. State of Kerala | 20-04-2022 | Supreme Court of India | S.K. Kaul, M.M. Sundresh | Corporate liability and environmental impact. | The petitioner challenged environmental penalties. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties. | Penalties were upheld. | null | Penalties upheld. |
925/2022 | GHI Bank vs. State of Andhra Pradesh | 25-04-2022 | Supreme Court of India | L. Nageswara Rao, Sanjiv Khanna | Banking regulations and state oversight. | The petitioner challenged state oversight measures. The Supreme Court upheld the measures. | Oversight measures were upheld. | null | Measures upheld. |
926/2022 | Bandhan Bank vs. State of Nagaland | 25-05-2022 | Supreme Court of India | A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan | Banking regulations and compliance. Financial reporting norms and penalties. | The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with financial reporting norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. | The penalties were upheld. | null | Penalties upheld. |
926/2022 | JKL Ltd. vs. State of West Bengal | 30-04-2022 | Supreme Court of India | K.M. Joseph, P.S. Narasimha | Corporate governance and state intervention. | The petitioner challenged state intervention in corporate governance. The Supreme Court upheld the intervention. | State intervention was upheld. | null | Intervention upheld. |
927/2022 | IDBI Bank vs. State of Manipur | 30-06-2022 | Supreme Court of India | R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha | Banking regulations and compliance. Fraud prevention norms and penalties. | The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with fraud prevention norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. | The penalties were upheld. | null | Penalties upheld. |
927/2022 | MNO Enterprises vs. State of Bihar | 05-05-2022 | Supreme Court of India | R. Banumathi, S. Ravindra Bhat | Taxation laws and corporate liability. | The petitioner challenged a tax levy. The Supreme Court upheld the levy. | Tax levy was upheld. | null | Levy upheld. |
928/2022 | DCB Bank vs. State of Haryana | 05-07-2022 | Supreme Court of India | S.A. Nazeer, Hemant Gupta | Banking regulations and compliance. Governance framework norms and penalties. | The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with governance framework norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. | The penalties were upheld. | null | Penalties upheld. |
928/2022 | PQR Corporation vs. State of Odisha | 10-05-2022 | Supreme Court of India | A.M. Khanwilkar, C.T. Ravikumar | Environmental regulations and corporate compliance. | The petitioner challenged environmental compliance costs. The Supreme Court upheld the costs. | Compliance costs were upheld. | null | Costs upheld. |
929/2022 | Jammu and Kashmir Bank vs. State of Maharashtra | 10-08-2022 | Supreme Court of India | N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari | Banking regulations and compliance. Risk assessment norms and penalties. | The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with risk assessment norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. | The penalties were upheld. | null | Penalties upheld. |
930/2022 | STU Industries vs. State of Assam | 20-05-2022 | Supreme Court of India | N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant | Corporate taxes and state audits. | The petitioner challenged a state audit report. The Supreme Court upheld the audit report. | Audit report was upheld. | null | Report upheld. |
931/2022 | Shamrao Vithal Co-operative Bank vs. State of Maharashtra | 20-10-2022 | Supreme Court of India | A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan | Banking regulations and compliance. Cooperative banking norms and penalties. | The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with cooperative banking norms. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, emphasizing regulatory compliance. | The penalties were upheld. | null | Penalties upheld. |
944/2022 | MNP Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra | 01-08-2022 | Supreme Court of India | A.M. Khanwilkar, B.R. Gavai | Corporate taxation and state taxes | The petitioner challenged the state's tax levy on corporate earnings. | The tax levy was partially reduced. | null | Tax levy partially reduced. |
945/2022 | State of Tamil Nadu vs. QRS Enterprises | 05-08-2022 | Supreme Court of India | R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha | Environmental law and corporate responsibility | The state sued the corporation for environmental damages caused by its operations. | The corporation was fined and required to implement remediation measures. | null | Corporation fined and remediation required. |
946/2022 | JKL Corporation vs. Union of India | 10-08-2022 | Supreme Court of India | N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant | Industrial safety standards and compliance | The petitioner contested the stringent safety standards imposed by the government. | The standards were upheld, with a timeline extension for compliance. | null | Standards upheld with compliance extension. |
947/2022 | State of Kerala vs. TUV Industries | 15-08-2022 | Supreme Court of India | U.U. Lalit, Hemant Gupta | Labor law and workers' rights | The state challenged the company's unfair labor practices. | The company was ordered to compensate the affected workers and improve labor conditions. | null | Company ordered to compensate and improve conditions. |
948/2022 | PQR Bank vs. State of Andhra Pradesh | 20-08-2022 | Supreme Court of India | D.Y. Chandrachud, Hima Kohli | Banking regulations and customer protection | The bank contested penalties for violating customer protection laws. | The penalties were upheld, with an additional fine imposed for repeated violations. | null | Penalties and additional fine imposed. |
949/2022 | State of Karnataka vs. XYZ Ltd. | 25-08-2022 | Supreme Court of India | A.S. Bopanna, Hrishikesh Roy | Environmental regulations and industrial operations | The state filed a case against the company for environmental degradation. | The company was ordered to halt operations until compliance with environmental standards. | null | Operations halted until compliance. |
950/2022 | ABC Enterprises vs. State of Haryana | 30-08-2022 | Supreme Court of India | R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha | Corporate law and mergers | The petitioner challenged the state's rejection of a proposed corporate merger. | The rejection was overturned, allowing the merger to proceed. | null | Merger allowed. |
951/2022 | State of Punjab vs. DEF Ltd. | 05-09-2022 | Supreme Court of India | N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant | Tax evasion and corporate responsibility | The state accused the company of tax evasion. | The company was found guilty and ordered to pay back taxes with penalties. | null | Company found guilty and penalized. |
952/2022 | GHI Ltd. vs. State of Bihar | 10-09-2022 | Supreme Court of India | A.M. Khanwilkar, B.R. Gavai | Corporate governance and state oversight | The petitioner contested the state's interference in corporate governance. | The interference was deemed necessary and lawful. | null | State interference deemed lawful. |
953/2022 | LMN Bank vs. State of Rajasthan | 15-09-2022 | Supreme Court of India | D.Y. Chandrachud, Hima Kohli | Banking fraud and regulatory oversight | The bank challenged the state's fraud investigation procedures. | The investigation procedures were upheld. | null | Investigation procedures upheld. |
954/2022 | State of Gujarat vs. OPQ Ltd. | 20-09-2022 | Supreme Court of India | A.S. Bopanna, Hrishikesh Roy | Environmental law and corporate responsibility | The state sued the company for environmental violations. | The company was fined and required to implement corrective measures. | null | Company fined and corrective measures required. |
955/2022 | State of Assam vs. RST Enterprises | 25-09-2022 | Supreme Court of India | R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha | Corporate governance and regulatory compliance | The state challenged the company's governance practices. | The company's practices were found compliant, and the case was dismissed. | null | Case dismissed, practices compliant. |
956/2022 | UVW Ltd. vs. Union of India | 30-09-2022 | Supreme Court of India | N.V. Ramana, Surya Kant | Industrial law and labor disputes | The petitioner challenged the labor union's strike action. | The strike was declared illegal and the union was fined. | null | Strike declared illegal, union fined. |
957/2022 | State of Madhya Pradesh vs. XYZ Ltd. | 05-10-2022 | Supreme Court of India | U.U. Lalit, Hemant Gupta | Environmental impact and industrial operations | The state sued the company for excessive environmental damage. | The company was ordered to cease operations and pay for environmental restoration. | null | Operations ceased, restoration ordered. |
987/2020 | Shanti Devi vs. State of Haryana | 22-06-2020 | Supreme Court of India | N.V. Ramana, Krishna Murari | Rights of tenants under tenancy laws. Protection from eviction. | The petitioner, a tenant, challenged her eviction under the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the tenant, reinforcing the protection from eviction under the Act. | The eviction order was set aside, and the tenant was granted protection. | null | Eviction order set aside; tenant protected. |
987/2023 | Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. vs. State of Karnataka | 22-02-2023 | Supreme Court of India | U.U. Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat | Industrial regulations and compliance. Environmental impact assessments. | The petitioner challenged penalties for non-compliance with environmental regulations. The Supreme Court upheld the penalties, stressing the importance of adhering to environmental norms. | The penalties were upheld. | null | Penalties upheld. |
998/2019 | Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra | 17-07-2019 | Supreme Court of India | Arun Mishra, Navin Sinha | Dispute over electricity tariffs. Regulatory powers of state electricity boards. | The petitioner challenged the tariff rates set by the state electricity board. The Supreme Court upheld the regulatory authority's power to set tariffs, affirming the rates as reasonable and justified. | The tariff rates were upheld. | null | Tariff rates upheld. |
Subsets and Splits