|
arXiv:1001.0034v1 [math.NT] 4 Jan 2010NEW IDENTITIES INVOLVING q-EULER |
|
POLYNOMIALS OF HIGHER ORDER |
|
T. Kim AND Y. H. Kim |
|
Abstract. In this paper, we present new generating functions which are relat ed to |
|
q-Euler numbers and polynomials of higher order. From these genera ting functions, we |
|
give new identities involving q-Euler numbers and polynomials of higher order. |
|
§1. Introduction/ Preliminaries |
|
LetCbe the complex number field. We assume that q∈Cwith|q|<1 and |
|
theq-number is defined by [ x]q=1−qx |
|
1−qin this paper. The q-factorial is given by |
|
[n]q! = [n]q[n−1]q···[2]q[1]qand theq-binomial formulae are known that |
|
(x:q)n=n/productdisplay |
|
i=1(1−xqi−1) =n/summationdisplay |
|
i=0/parenleftbiggn |
|
i/parenrightbigg |
|
qq(i |
|
2)(−x)i,(see [3, 14, 15]) , |
|
and |
|
1 |
|
(x:q)n=n/productdisplay |
|
i=1/parenleftbigg1 |
|
1−xqi−1/parenrightbigg |
|
=∞/summationdisplay |
|
i=0/parenleftbiggn+i−1 |
|
i/parenrightbigg |
|
qxi,(see [3, 5, 14, 15]) , |
|
where/parenleftbign |
|
i/parenrightbig |
|
q=[n]q! |
|
[n−i]q![i]q!=[n]q[n−1]q···[n−i+1]q |
|
[i]q!. |
|
The Euler polynomials are defined by2 |
|
et+1ext=/summationtext∞ |
|
n=0En(x)tn |
|
n!, for|t|< π. In the |
|
special case x= 0,En(=En(0)) are called the n-th Euler numbers. In this paper, we |
|
consider the q-extensions of Euler numbers and polynomials of higher orde r. Barnes’ |
|
multiple Bernoulli polynomials are also defined by |
|
(1) |
|
tr |
|
/producttextr |
|
j=1(eajt−1)ext=∞/summationdisplay |
|
n=0Bn(x,r|a1,···,ar)tn |
|
n!,where|t|<max |
|
1≤i≤r2π |
|
|ai|, (see [1, 14]). |
|
Key words and phrases. : multiple q-zeta function, q-Euler numbers and polynomials, higher |
|
order q-Euler numbers, Laurent series, Cauchy integral. |
|
2000 AMS Subject Classification: 11B68, 11S80 |
|
The present Research has been conducted by the research Grant of Kw angwoon University in 2010 |
|
Typeset by AMS-TEX |
|
1In one of an impressive series of papers (see [1, 6, 14]), Barn es developed the so-called |
|
multiple zeta and multiple gamma function. Let a1,···,aNbe positive parameters. |
|
Then Barnes’ multiple zeta function is defined by |
|
ζN(s,w|a1,···,aN) =/summationdisplay |
|
m1,···,mN=0(w+m1a1+···+mNaN)−s,(see [1]), |
|
whereℜ(s)> N,ℜ(w)>0. Form∈Z+, we have |
|
ζN(−m,w|a1,···,aN) =(−1)mm! |
|
(N+m)!BN+m(w,N|a1,···,aN). |
|
In this paper, we consider Barnes’ type multiple q-Euler numbers and polynomials. |
|
The purpose of this paper is to present new generating functi ons which are related |
|
toq-Euler numbers and polynomials of higher order. From the Mel lin transformation |
|
of these generating functions, we derive the q-extensions o f Barnes’ type multiple |
|
zeta functions, which interpolate the q-Euler polynomials of higher order at negative |
|
integer. Finally, we give new identities involving q-Euler numbers and polynomials of |
|
higher order. |
|
§2.q-Euler numbers and polynomials of higher order |
|
In this section, we assume that q∈Cwith|q|<1. Letx,a1,... ,a rbe complex |
|
numbers with positive real parts. Barnes’ type multiple Eul er polynomialsare defined |
|
by |
|
(2)2r |
|
/producttextr |
|
j=1(eajt+1)ext=∞/summationdisplay |
|
n=0E(r) |
|
n(x|a1,... ,a r)tn |
|
n!,for|t|<max |
|
1≤i≤rπ |
|
|wi|,(see [6]), |
|
andE(r) |
|
n(a1,... ,a r)(=E(r) |
|
n(0|a1,... ,a r)) are called the n-th Barnes’ type multiple |
|
Euler numbers. First, we consider the q-extension of Euler polynomials. The q-Euler |
|
polynomials are defined by |
|
(3)Fq(t,x) =∞/summationdisplay |
|
n=0En,q(x)tn |
|
n!= [2]q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m=0(−q)me[m+x]qt,(see [8, 11, 13, 14, 15]) . |
|
From (3), we have |
|
En,q(x) =[2]q |
|
(1−q)nn/summationdisplay |
|
l=0/parenleftbiggn |
|
l/parenrightbigg(−1)lqlx |
|
(1+ql+1). |
|
In the special case x= 0,En,q(=En,q(0)) are called the n-thq-Euler numbers. From |
|
(3), we can easily derive the following relation. |
|
E0,q= 1,andq(qE+1)n+En,q= 0 ifn≥1,(see [8, 16, 17]) , |
|
2where we use the standard convention about replacing EkbyEk,q.It is easy to show |
|
that |
|
lim |
|
q→1Fq(t,x) =2 |
|
et+1ext=∞/summationdisplay |
|
n=0En(x)tn |
|
n!,(see [2, 3, 19-23]) , |
|
whereEn(x) are the n-th Euler polynomials. For r∈N, the Euler polynomials of |
|
orderris defined by |
|
(4)/parenleftbigg2 |
|
et+1/parenrightbiggr |
|
ext=∞/summationdisplay |
|
n=0E(r) |
|
n(x)tn |
|
n!,for|t|< π. |
|
Now we consider the q-extension of (4). |
|
(5)F(r) |
|
q(t,x) = [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m1,...,m r=0(−q)m1+···+mre[m1+···+mr+x]qt=∞/summationdisplay |
|
n=0E(r) |
|
n,q(x)tn |
|
n!, |
|
whereE(r) |
|
n,q(x) are called the n-thq-Euler polynomials of order r(see [10-15]). From |
|
(5), we can derive |
|
(6) E(r) |
|
n,q(x) =[2]r |
|
q |
|
(1−q)nn/summationdisplay |
|
l=0/parenleftbiggn |
|
l/parenrightbigg(−1)lqlx |
|
(1+ql+1)r. |
|
By (5) and (6), we see that |
|
(7) F(r) |
|
q(t,x) = [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m=0/parenleftbiggm+r−1 |
|
m/parenrightbigg |
|
(−q)me[m+x]qt. |
|
Thus, we note that lim q→1F(r) |
|
q(t,x) =/parenleftBig |
|
2 |
|
et+1/parenrightBigr |
|
ext=/summationtext∞ |
|
n=0E(r) |
|
n(x)tn |
|
n!.In the special |
|
casex= 0,E(r) |
|
n,q(=E(r) |
|
n,q(0)) are called the n-thq-Euler numbers of order r. By (5), |
|
(6) and (7), we obtain the following proposition. |
|
Proposition 1. Forr∈N, let |
|
F(r) |
|
q(t,x) = [2]r |
|
q/summationdisplay |
|
m1,...,m r=0(−q)m1+···+mre[m1+···+mr+x]qt=∞/summationdisplay |
|
n=0E(r) |
|
n,q(x)tn |
|
n!. |
|
Then we have |
|
E(r) |
|
n,q(x) =[2]r |
|
q |
|
(1−q)nn/summationdisplay |
|
l=0/parenleftbiggn |
|
l/parenrightbigg(−1)lqlx |
|
(1+ql+1)r= [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m=0/parenleftbiggm+r−1 |
|
m/parenrightbigg |
|
(−q)m[m+x]n |
|
q. |
|
3From the Mellin transformation of F(r) |
|
q(t,x), we can derive the following equation. |
|
1 |
|
Γ(s)/integraldisplay∞ |
|
0F(r) |
|
q(−t,x)ts−1dt= [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m1,...,m r=0(−q)m1+···+mr |
|
[m1+···+mr+x]sq |
|
= [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m=0/parenleftbiggm+r−1 |
|
m/parenrightbigg |
|
(−q)m1 |
|
[m+x]sq, (8) |
|
wheres∈C,x/negationslash= 0,−1,−2,.... By (8), we can define the multiple q-zeta function |
|
related to q-Euler polynomials. |
|
Definition 2. Fors∈C,x∈Rwithx/negationslash= 0,−1,−2,..., we define the multiple q-zeta |
|
function related to q-Euler polynomials as |
|
ζq,r(s,x) = [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m1,...,m r=0(−q)m1+···+mr |
|
[m1+···+mr+x]sq. |
|
Note that ζq,r(s,x) is a meromorphic function in whole complex s-plane. From (8), |
|
we also note that |
|
ζq,r(s,x) = [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m=0/parenleftbiggm+r−1 |
|
m/parenrightbigg |
|
(−q)m1 |
|
[m+x]sq. |
|
By Laurent series and the Cauchy residue theorem in (5) and (8 ), we see that |
|
ζq(−n,x) =E(n) |
|
n,q(x),forn∈Z+. |
|
Therefore, we obtain the following theorem. |
|
Theorem 3. Forr∈N,n∈Z+, andx∈Rwithx/negationslash= 0,−1,−2,..., we have |
|
ζq(−n,x) =E(r) |
|
n,q(x). |
|
Letχbe the Dirichlet’s character with conductor f∈Nwithf≡1 (mod 2). Then |
|
the generalized q-Euler polynomial attached to χare considered by |
|
Fq,χ(x) =∞/summationdisplay |
|
n=0En,χ,q(x)tn |
|
n!= [2]q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m=0(−q)mχ(m)e[m+x]qt. |
|
From (3) and (9), we have |
|
En,χ,q(x) =[2]q |
|
[2]qff−1/summationdisplay |
|
a=0(−q)aχ(a)En,qf(x+a |
|
f). |
|
4In the special case x= 0,En,χ,q=En,χ,q(0) are called the n-th generated q-Euler |
|
number attached to χ. |
|
It is known that the generalized Euler polynomials of order rare defined by |
|
(10) (2/summationtextf−1 |
|
a=0(−1)aχ(a)eat |
|
eft+1)rext=∞/summationdisplay |
|
n=0E(r) |
|
n,χ(x)tn |
|
n!, |
|
for|t|<π |
|
f. |
|
We consider the q-extension of (10). The generalized q-Euler polynomials of order |
|
rattached to χare defined by |
|
F(r) |
|
q,χ(t,x) = [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m1,...,m r=0(−q)m1+···+mr(r/productdisplay |
|
i=1χ(mi))e[m1+···+mr+x]qt |
|
=∞/summationdisplay |
|
n=0E(r) |
|
n,χ,q(x)tn |
|
n!,(see [14, 15]) . (11) |
|
Note that |
|
lim |
|
q→1F(r) |
|
q,χ(t,x) = (2/summationtextf−1 |
|
a=0(−1)aχ(a)eat |
|
eft+1)r. |
|
By (11), we easily see that |
|
E(r) |
|
n,χ,q(x) =[2]r |
|
q |
|
(1−q)nn/summationdisplay |
|
l=0/parenleftbiggn |
|
l/parenrightbigg |
|
(−qx)lf−1/summationdisplay |
|
a1,...,ar=0(r/productdisplay |
|
j=1χ(aj))(−ql+1)/summationtextr |
|
i=1ai |
|
(1+q(l+1)f)r |
|
= [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m1,...,m r=0(−q)m1+···+mr(r/productdisplay |
|
i=1χ(mi))[m1+···+mr+x]n |
|
q. |
|
Fors∈C,x∈Rwithx/negationslash= 0,−1,−2,..., we have |
|
1 |
|
Γ(s)/integraldisplay∞ |
|
0F(r) |
|
q,χ(−t,x)ts−1dt |
|
= [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m1,...,m r=0(−q)m1+···+mr(/producttextr |
|
i=1χ(mi)) |
|
[m1+···+mr+x]sq,(see [15]) . (12) |
|
From (12), we can consider the Dirichlet’s type multiple q-l-function as follows : |
|
Definition 4. Fors∈C,x∈Rwithx/negationslash= 0,−1,−2,..., we define the Dirichlet’s |
|
type multiple q-l-function as |
|
lq(s,x|χ) = [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m1,...,m r=0(−q)m1+···+mr(/producttextr |
|
i=1χ(mi)) |
|
[m1+···+mr+x]sq,(see [15]) . |
|
By Laurent series and the Cauchy residue theorem in (11) and ( 12), we obtain the |
|
following theorem. |
|
5Theorem 5. Forn∈Z+, we have |
|
lq(−n,x|χ) =E(r) |
|
n,χ,q(x). |
|
Forh∈Zandr∈N, we consider the extended r-pleq-Euler polynomials. |
|
F(h,r) |
|
q(t,x) = [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m1,...,m r=0q/summationtextr |
|
j=1(h−j+1)mj(−1)/summationtextr |
|
j=1mje[m1+···+mr+x]qt |
|
=∞/summationdisplay |
|
n=0E(h,r) |
|
n,q(x)tn |
|
n!. (13) |
|
Note that |
|
lim |
|
q→1F(h,r) |
|
q(t,x) = (2 |
|
et+1)rext=∞/summationdisplay |
|
n=0E(r) |
|
n(x)tn |
|
n!. |
|
From (13), we note that |
|
E(h,r) |
|
n,q(x) =[2]r |
|
q |
|
(1−q)nn/summationdisplay |
|
l=0/parenleftbiggn |
|
l/parenrightbigg(−qx)l |
|
(−qh−r+l+1:q)r |
|
= [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m=0/parenleftbiggm+r−1 |
|
m/parenrightbigg |
|
q(−qh−r+1)m[m+x]n |
|
q. (14) |
|
By (14), we easily see that |
|
(15)F(h,r) |
|
q(t,x) = [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m=0/parenleftbiggm+r−1 |
|
m/parenrightbigg |
|
q(−qh−r+1)me[m+x]qt,(see [11, 13, 14]) . |
|
Using the Mellin transform for F(h,r) |
|
q(t,x), we have |
|
1 |
|
Γ(s)/integraldisplay∞ |
|
0F(r) |
|
q(−t,x)ts−1dt |
|
= [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m1,...,m r=0(−1)m1+···+mrq/summationtextr |
|
j=1(h−j+1)mj |
|
[m1+···+mr+x]sq,(see [13, 14, 15]) ,(16) |
|
fors∈C,x∈Rwithx/negationslash= 0,−1,−2,.... Now we can define the extended q-zeta |
|
function associated with E(h,r) |
|
n,q(x). |
|
6Definition 6. Fors∈C,x∈Rwithx/negationslash= 0,−1,−2,..., we define the (h, q)-zeta |
|
function as |
|
ζ(h) |
|
q,r(s,x) = [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m1,...,m r=0(−1)m1+···+mrq/summationtextr |
|
j=1(h−j+1)mj |
|
[m1+···+mr+x]sq. |
|
Notethat ζ(h) |
|
q,r(s,x)isalsoa meromorphic function inwholecomplex s-plane. From |
|
(16) and (15), we note that |
|
(17) ζ(h) |
|
q,r(s,x) = [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m=0/parenleftbiggm+r−1 |
|
m/parenrightbigg |
|
q(−qh−j+1)m1 |
|
[m+x]sq. |
|
Using the Cauchy residue theorem and Laurent series in (16), we obtain the following |
|
theorem. |
|
Theorem 7. Forn∈Z+, we have |
|
ζ(h) |
|
q,r(−n,x) =E(h,r) |
|
n,q(x). |
|
We consider the extended r-ple generalized q-Euler polynomials as follows : |
|
F(h,r) |
|
q,χ(t,x) |
|
= [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m1,...,m r=0q/summationtextr |
|
j=1(h−j+1)mj(−1)/summationtextr |
|
j=1mj(r/productdisplay |
|
j=1χ(mj))e[m1+···+mr+x]qt(18) |
|
=∞/summationdisplay |
|
n=0E(h,r) |
|
n,χ,q(x)tn |
|
n!. |
|
By (18), we see that |
|
E(h,r) |
|
n,χ,q(x) =[2]r |
|
q |
|
(1−q)nf−1/summationdisplay |
|
a1,...,ar=0(−1)/summationtextr |
|
j=1aj(r/productdisplay |
|
j=1χ(aj))n/summationdisplay |
|
l=0/parenleftbiggn |
|
l/parenrightbigg(−1)lqlxq(h−j+l+1)aj |
|
(−q(h−r+l+1)f:qf)r |
|
=[2]r |
|
q |
|
[2]r |
|
qf[f]n |
|
qf−1/summationdisplay |
|
a1,...,ar=0(−1)/summationtextr |
|
j=1aj(r/productdisplay |
|
j=1χ(aj))q/summationtextr |
|
j=1(h−j+1)ajζ(h) |
|
qf,r(−n,x+/summationtextr |
|
j=1aj |
|
f).(19) |
|
Therefore, we obtain the following theorem. |
|
7Theorem 8. Forn∈Z+, we have |
|
E(h,r) |
|
n,χ,q(x) |
|
=[2]r |
|
q |
|
[2]r |
|
qf[f]n |
|
qf−1/summationdisplay |
|
a1,...,ar=0(−1)/summationtextr |
|
j=1aj(r/productdisplay |
|
j=1χ(aj))q/summationtextr |
|
j=1(h−j+1)ajζ(h) |
|
qf,r(−n,x+/summationtextr |
|
j=1aj |
|
f). |
|
From (18), we note that |
|
1 |
|
Γ(s)/integraldisplay∞ |
|
0F(h,r) |
|
q,χ(−t,x)ts−1dt |
|
= [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m1,...,m r=0q/summationtextr |
|
j=1(h−j+1)mj(/producttextr |
|
j=1χ(mj))(−1)m1+···+mr |
|
[m1+···+mr+x]sq, (20) |
|
wheres∈C,x∈Rwithx/negationslash= 0,−1,−2,.... |
|
From (20), we define the Dirichlet’s type multiple ( h,q)-l-function associated with |
|
the generalized multiple q-Euler polynomials attached to χ. |
|
Definition 9. Fors∈C,x∈Rwithx/negationslash= 0,−1,−2,..., we define the Dirichlet’s |
|
type multiple q-l-function as follows : |
|
l(h) |
|
q(s,x|χ) = [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m1,...,m r=0q/summationtextr |
|
j=1(h−j+1)mj(/producttextr |
|
i=1χ(mi))(−1)m1+···+mr |
|
[m1+···+mr+x]sq. |
|
Note that l(h) |
|
q(s,x|χ) is a meromorphic function in whole complex plane. It is easy |
|
to show that |
|
l(h) |
|
q(s,x|χ) |
|
=[2]r |
|
q |
|
[2]r |
|
qf1 |
|
[f]sqf−1/summationdisplay |
|
a1,...,ar=0(−1)/summationtextr |
|
j=1aj(r/productdisplay |
|
j=1χ(aj))q/summationtextr |
|
j=1(h−j+1)ajζ(h) |
|
qf,r(s,x+/summationtextr |
|
j=1aj |
|
f). |
|
By (19) and (20), we obtain the following theorem. |
|
Theorem 10. Forn∈Z+, we have |
|
l(h) |
|
q(−n,x|χ) =E(h,r) |
|
n,χ,q(x). |
|
Finally, we give the q-extension of Barnes’ type multiple Euler polynomials in (2 ). |
|
Forx,a1,... ,a r∈Cwith positive real part, let us define the Barnes’ type mutipl e |
|
8q-Euler polynomials in Cas follows : |
|
F(r) |
|
q(t,x|a1,... ,a r;b1,... ,b r) |
|
= [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m1,...,m r=0(−1)m1+···+mrq(b1+1)m1+···+(br+1)mre[a1m1+···+armr+x]t(21) |
|
=∞/summationdisplay |
|
n=0E(r) |
|
n,q(x|a1,... ,a r;b1,... ,b r)tn |
|
n!, |
|
whereb1,... ,b r∈Z. By (21), we see that |
|
E(r) |
|
n,q(x|a1,... ,a r;b1,... ,b r) |
|
=[2]r |
|
q |
|
(1−q)nn/summationdisplay |
|
l=0/parenleftbiggn |
|
l/parenrightbigg(−1)lqlx |
|
(1+qla1+b1+1)···(1+qlar+br+1) |
|
= [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m1,...,m r=0(−1)m1+···+mrq(b1+1)m1+···+(br+1)mr[a1m1+···+armr+x]n |
|
q. |
|
From (21), we note that |
|
1 |
|
Γ(s)/integraldisplay∞ |
|
0F(r) |
|
q(−t,x|a1,... ,a r;b1,... ,b r)ts−1dt |
|
= [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m1,...,m r=0(−q)m1+···+mrqb1m1+···+brmr |
|
[a1m1+···+armr+x]sq. (22) |
|
By (22), we define the Barnes’ type multiple q-zeta function as follows : |
|
ζq,r(s,x|a1,... ,a r;b1,... ,b r) |
|
= [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m1,...,m r=0(−q)m1+···+mrqb1m1+···+brmr |
|
[a1m1+···+armr+x]sq, |
|
wheres∈C,x∈Rwithx/negationslash= 0,−1,−2,.... By (21), (22) and (23), we obtain the |
|
following theorem. |
|
Theorem 11. Forn∈Z+, we have |
|
ζq,r(s,x|a1,... ,a r;b1,... ,b r) =E(r) |
|
n,q(x|a1,... ,a r;b1,... ,b r). |
|
Letχbe the Dirichlet’s character with conductor f∈Nwithf≡1 (mod 2). Then |
|
the generalized Barnes’ type multiple q-Euler polynomials attached to χare defined |
|
9by |
|
F(r) |
|
q,χ(t,x|a1,... ,a r;b1,... ,b r) |
|
= [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m1,...,m r=0(−q)m1+···+mrqb1m1+···+brmr(r/productdisplay |
|
i=1χ(mi))e[a1m1+···+armr+x]qt(24) |
|
=∞/summationdisplay |
|
n=0E(r) |
|
n,χ,q(x|a1,... ,a r;b1,... ,b r)tn |
|
n!, |
|
From (24), we note that |
|
1 |
|
Γ(s)/integraldisplay∞ |
|
0F(r) |
|
q,χ(−t,x|a1,... ,a r;b1,... ,b r)ts−1dt |
|
= [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m1,...,m r=0(−q)m1+···+mrqb1m1+···+brmr(/producttextr |
|
i=1χ(mi)) |
|
[a1m1+···+armr+x]sq. (25) |
|
By (25), we can define Barnes’ type multiple q-l-function in C. Fors∈C,x∈Rwith |
|
x/negationslash= 0,−1,−2,..., let us define the Barnes’ type multiple q-l-function as follows : |
|
l(r) |
|
q(s,x|a1,... ,a r;b1,... ,b r) |
|
= [2]r |
|
q∞/summationdisplay |
|
m1,...,m r=0(−q)m1+···+mrqb1m1+···+brmr(/producttextr |
|
i=1χ(mi)) |
|
[a1m1+···+armr+x]sq. (26) |
|
Note that l(r) |
|
q(s,x|a1,... ,a r;b1,... ,b r) is a meromorphic function in whole complex |
|
s-plane. By (24), (25) and (26), we easily see that |
|
l(r) |
|
q(−n,x|a1,... ,a r;b1,... ,b r) =E(r) |
|
n,χ,q(x|a1,... ,a r;b1,... ,b r) |
|
forn∈Z+, (see [1-18]). |
|
References |
|
[1] E. W. Barnes, On the theory of multiple gamma function , Trans. Camb. Ohilos. Soc. A |
|
196(1904), 374-425. |
|
[2] I. N. Cangul,V. Kurt, H. Ozden, Y. Simsek, On the higher-order w-q-Genocchi numbers , |
|
Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. 19(2009), 39–57. |
|
[3] N. K.Govil, V. Gupta, Convergence of q-Meyer-Konig-Zeller-Durrmeyer operators , Adv. |
|
Stud. Contemp. Math. 19(2009), 97–108. |
|
[4] T. Kim, On aq-analogue of the p-adic log gamma functions and related integrals , J.Number |
|
Theory76(1999), 320–329. |
|
[5] T. Kim, q-Volkenborn integration , Russ. J. Math. Phys. 9(2002), 288–299. |
|
[6] T. Kim, On Euler-Barnes multiple zeta functions , Russ. J. Math. Phys. 10(2003), 261–267. |
|
10[7] T. Kim, Analytic continuation of multiple q-zeta functions and their values at negative |
|
integers, Russ. J. Math. Phys. 11(2004), 71–76. |
|
[8] T. Kim, The modified q-Euler numbers and polynomials , Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. 16 |
|
(2008), 161–170. |
|
[9] T. Kim, Note on the q-Euler numbers of higher order , Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. 19 |
|
(2009), 25–29. |
|
[10] T. Kim, Note on Dedekind type DC sums , Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. 18(2009), 249–260. |
|
[11] T. Kim, Note on the Euler q-zeta functions , J. Number Theory 129(2009), 1798–1804. |
|
[12] T. Kim, A note on the generalized q-Euler numbers , Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 12(2009), |
|
45–50. |
|
[13] T. Kim, Some identities on the q-Euler polynomials of higher order a nd q-stirling numbers |
|
by the fermionic p-adic integral on Zp, Russ. J. Math. Phys. 16(2009), 1061-9208. |
|
[14] T. Kim, Barnes type multiple q-zeta functions and q-Euler polynomials , arXiv:0912.5119v1. |
|
[15] T. Kim, Note on multiple q-zeta functions , to be appeared in Russ. J. Math. Phys., |
|
arXiv:0912.5477v1. |
|
[16] T. Kim, On theq-extension of Euler and Genocchi numbers , J. Math. Anal. Appl. 326, |
|
1458–1465. |
|
[17] T. Kim, Onp-adicq-l-functions and sums of powers , J. Math. Anal. Appl. 329, 1472–1481. |
|
[18] T. Kim, Y. Simsek, Analytic continuation of the multiple Daehee q-l-functions associated |
|
with Daehee numbers , Russ. J. Math. Phys. 15(2008), 58–65. |
|
[19] Y. H. Kim, W. Kim, C. S. Ryoo, On the twisted q-Euler zeta function associated with |
|
twistedq-Euler numbers , Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 12(2009), 93-100. |
|
[20] H.Ozden, I.N.Cangul, Y.Simsek, Remarks on q-Bernoulli numbers associated with Daehee |
|
numbers , Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. 18(2009), 41-48. |
|
[21] K. Shiratani, S. Yamamoto, On ap-adic interpolation function for the Euler numbers and |
|
its derivatives , Mem. Fac. Sci., Kyushu University Ser. A 39(1985), 113-125. |
|
[22] Y. Simsek, Theorems on twisted L-function and twisted Bernoulli numbers , Advan. Stud. |
|
Contemp. Math. 11(2005), 205–218. |
|
[23] Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Summation formulas of q-series by modified Abel’s lemma , Adv. Stud. |
|
Contemp. Math. 17(2008), 119–129. |
|
Taekyun Kim |
|
Division of General Education-Mathematics, Kwangwoon Uni versity, |
|
Seoul 139-701, S. Korea e-mail: [email protected] |
|
Young-Hee Kim |
|
Division of General Education-Mathematics, |
|
Kwangwoon University, |
|
Seoul 139-701, S. Korea e-mail: [email protected] |
|
11 |