File size: 2,926 Bytes
91c3516 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 |
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "Does the generated architectural style accurately reflect the basic elements of architecture described in the text?",
"0_point_standard": "The architectural style does not match the text description, failing to accurately depict the basic elements of the architecture.",
"1_point_standard": "The architectural style fully reflects the basic elements of architecture described in the text."
},
{
"question": "Is the outdoor photographic effect applied consistently throughout the image, creating a realistic and coherent representation?",
"0_point_standard": "The outdoor photographic effect is inconsistent or unrealistic, leading to a disjointed architectural representation.",
"1_point_standard": "The outdoor photographic effect is applied consistently, making the architectural representation realistic and coherent."
},
{
"question": "Does the model accurately follow specific architectural styles or materials mentioned in the text (e.g., Gothic, glass curtain walls, brickwork)?",
"0_point_standard": "The model fails to accurately represent the specific architectural styles or materials mentioned in the text.",
"1_point_standard": "The model accurately exhibits the specific architectural styles or materials described in the text."
},
{
"question": "Are the structural details, such as windows, doors, and facade elements, rendered accurately and clearly in accordance with the described architectural style?",
"0_point_standard": "The structural details are inaccurate or unclear, failing to reflect the specified architectural style.",
"1_point_standard": "The structural details are rendered accurately and clearly, matching the architectural style described in the text very well."
},
{
"question": "Does the overall composition and logical consistency of the image meet professional architectural photography standards?",
"0_point_standard": "The image lacks logical consistency or is poorly composed, not meeting professional architectural photography standards.",
"1_point_standard": "The image is logically consistent and well-composed, meeting professional architectural photography standards."
},
{
"question": "Does the image exhibit compelling aesthetic appeal and visual impact, meeting professional architectural visualization standards?",
"0_point_standard": "The image lacks aesthetic appeal and does not provide significant visual impact, falling short of professional visualization standards.",
"1_point_standard": "The image possesses strong aesthetic appeal and visual impact, meeting professional architectural visualization standards."
}
]
} |