update the evaluation part
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -59,9 +59,48 @@ The ATK Dataset is in active development, with ongoing data collection from loca
|
|
59 |
|
60 |
This dataset aims to highlight the importance of cultural and regional knowledge in AI systems, encouraging developers to create more inclusive and globally competent models. By focusing on Taiwan-specific information, the ATK Dataset addresses a critical gap in current AI evaluation metrics.
|
61 |
|
62 |
-
##
|
63 |
|
64 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
66 |
## Contributors
|
67 |
| 年級 | 領域 | 教師名稱 | 學校 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
60 |
This dataset aims to highlight the importance of cultural and regional knowledge in AI systems, encouraging developers to create more inclusive and globally competent models. By focusing on Taiwan-specific information, the ATK Dataset addresses a critical gap in current AI evaluation metrics.
|
61 |
|
62 |
+
## Evaluation:
|
63 |
|
64 |
+
Here's the table using claude as the evaluation model to see how GPT-4o, Claude sonnet 3.5 and Gemini perform on answering the questions:
|
65 |
+
|
66 |
+
| Model | Subject | (1) Overall Model Response Accuracy | (2) Model Response Confidence Average (0-100) | (3) Model Response Key Confidence Average |
|
67 |
+
|-------|---------|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|
68 |
+
| GPT-4o | Overall | 70.35% | 75.11 | 63.61 |
|
69 |
+
| | Elementary School Civics Studies | 94.00% | 76.52 | 65.00 |
|
70 |
+
| | High School Taiwan Literature | 78.89% | 83.52 | 74.21 |
|
71 |
+
| | High School Society Studies | 26.32% | 71.20 | 66.71 |
|
72 |
+
| | Junior High Society Studies | 69.29% | 67.16 | 58.57 |
|
73 |
+
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Overall | 53.76% | 85.44 | 63.13 |
|
74 |
+
| | Elementary School Civics Studies | 67.33% | 85.20 | 50.20 |
|
75 |
+
| | High School Taiwan Literature | 50.00% | 87.22 | 67.56 |
|
76 |
+
| | High School Society Studies | 21.05% | 67.60 | 81.20 |
|
77 |
+
| | Junior High Society Studies | 49.61% | 84.84 | 48.75 |
|
78 |
+
| Gemini Output | Overall | 32.68% | 83.34 | 32.54 |
|
79 |
+
| | Elementary School Civics Studies | 47.33% | 79.65 | 21.19 |
|
80 |
+
| | High School Taiwan Literature | 44.44% | 85.13 | 36.10 |
|
81 |
+
| | High School Society Studies | 8.42% | 91.25 | 43.91 |
|
82 |
+
| | Junior High Society Studies | 25.98% | 84.70 | 29.79 |
|
83 |
+
|
84 |
+
**Key Observations:**
|
85 |
+
|
86 |
+
- Subject-wise Performance:
|
87 |
+
- Elementary School Civics Studies: All models performed relatively well here, with GPT-4 leading (94%), followed by Claude (67.33%), and Gemini (47.33%)
|
88 |
+
- High School Taiwan Literature: GPT-4 showed strong performance (78.89%), while Claude (50%) and Gemini (44.44%) were notably lower
|
89 |
+
- High School Society Studies: All models struggled here, with particularly low accuracy (GPT-4: 26.32%, Claude: 21.05%, Gemini: 8.42%)
|
90 |
+
|
91 |
+
|
92 |
+
- Confidence Levels:
|
93 |
+
|
94 |
+
|
95 |
+
`Interestingly, all models showed relatively high confidence (mostly above 70%) despite varying accuracy levels
|
96 |
+
Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini often showed higher confidence than GPT-4, despite lower accuracy
|
97 |
+
This suggests potential overconfidence issues, particularly in Gemini and Claude`
|
98 |
+
|
99 |
+
|
100 |
+
- Strongest Areas:
|
101 |
+
- GPT-4: Elementary School Civics Studies (94%)
|
102 |
+
- Claude: Elementary School Civics Studies (67.33%)
|
103 |
+
- Gemini: Elementary School Civics Studies (47.33%)
|
104 |
|
105 |
## Contributors
|
106 |
| 年級 | 領域 | 教師名稱 | 學校 |
|