Datasets:

ZixuanKe

/

fingpt-convfinqa

like 0

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: cash and a commitment to fund the capital needs of the business until such time as its cumulative funding is equal to funding that we have provided from inception through the effective date of the transaction . the transaction created a new joint venture which does business as comercia global payments brazil . as a result of the transaction , we deconsolidated global payments brazil , and we apply the equity method of accounting to our retained interest in comercia global payments brazil . we recorded a gain on the transaction of $ 2.1 million which is included in interest and other income in the consolidated statement of income for the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2014 . the results of the brazil operation from inception until the restructuring into a joint venture on september 30 , 2013 were not material to our consolidated results of operations , and the assets and liabilities that we derecognized were not material to our consolidated balance sheet . american express portfolio on october 24 , 2013 , we acquired a merchant portfolio in the czech republic from american express limited for $ 1.9 million . the acquired assets have been classified as customer-related intangible assets and contract-based intangible assets with estimated amortization periods of 10 years . paypros on march 4 , 2014 , we completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding stock of payment processing , inc . ( 201cpaypros 201d ) for $ 420.0 million in cash plus $ 7.7 million in cash for working capital , subject to adjustment based on a final determination of working capital . we funded the acquisition with a combination of cash on hand and proceeds from our new term loan . paypros , based in california , is a provider of fully-integrated payment solutions for small-to-medium sized merchants in the united states . paypros delivers its products and services through a network of technology-based enterprise software partners to vertical markets that are complementary to the markets served by accelerated payment technologies ( 201capt 201d ) , which we acquired in october 2012 . we acquired paypros to expand our direct distribution capabilities in the united states and to further enhance our existing integrated solutions offerings . this acquisition was recorded as a business combination , and the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values . due to the timing of this transaction , the allocation of the purchase price is preliminary pending final valuation of intangible assets and deferred income taxes as well as resolution of the working capital settlement discussed above . the purchase price of paypros was determined by analyzing the historical and prospective financial statements . acquisition costs associated with this purchase were not material . the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocation ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 271577</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer-related intangible assets</td><td>147500</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contract-based intangible assets</td><td>31000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired technology</td><td>10700</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fixed assets</td><td>1680</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets</td><td>4230</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>466687</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-38949 ( 38949 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 427738</td></tr></table> the preliminary purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill , included in the north america merchant services segment , of $ 271.6 million . such goodwill is attributable primarily to synergies with the services offered and markets served by paypros . the goodwill associated with the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets and the contract-based intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 13 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 7 years. .\nQuestion: what was the value of acquired technology?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "10700.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: cash and a commitment to fund the capital needs of the business until such time as its cumulative funding is equal to funding that we have provided from inception through the effective date of the transaction . the transaction created a new joint venture which does business as comercia global payments brazil . as a result of the transaction , we deconsolidated global payments brazil , and we apply the equity method of accounting to our retained interest in comercia global payments brazil . we recorded a gain on the transaction of $ 2.1 million which is included in interest and other income in the consolidated statement of income for the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2014 . the results of the brazil operation from inception until the restructuring into a joint venture on september 30 , 2013 were not material to our consolidated results of operations , and the assets and liabilities that we derecognized were not material to our consolidated balance sheet . american express portfolio on october 24 , 2013 , we acquired a merchant portfolio in the czech republic from american express limited for $ 1.9 million . the acquired assets have been classified as customer-related intangible assets and contract-based intangible assets with estimated amortization periods of 10 years . paypros on march 4 , 2014 , we completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding stock of payment processing , inc . ( 201cpaypros 201d ) for $ 420.0 million in cash plus $ 7.7 million in cash for working capital , subject to adjustment based on a final determination of working capital . we funded the acquisition with a combination of cash on hand and proceeds from our new term loan . paypros , based in california , is a provider of fully-integrated payment solutions for small-to-medium sized merchants in the united states . paypros delivers its products and services through a network of technology-based enterprise software partners to vertical markets that are complementary to the markets served by accelerated payment technologies ( 201capt 201d ) , which we acquired in october 2012 . we acquired paypros to expand our direct distribution capabilities in the united states and to further enhance our existing integrated solutions offerings . this acquisition was recorded as a business combination , and the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values . due to the timing of this transaction , the allocation of the purchase price is preliminary pending final valuation of intangible assets and deferred income taxes as well as resolution of the working capital settlement discussed above . the purchase price of paypros was determined by analyzing the historical and prospective financial statements . acquisition costs associated with this purchase were not material . the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocation ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 271577</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer-related intangible assets</td><td>147500</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contract-based intangible assets</td><td>31000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired technology</td><td>10700</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fixed assets</td><td>1680</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets</td><td>4230</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>466687</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-38949 ( 38949 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 427738</td></tr></table> the preliminary purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill , included in the north america merchant services segment , of $ 271.6 million . such goodwill is attributable primarily to synergies with the services offered and markets served by paypros . the goodwill associated with the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets and the contract-based intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 13 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 7 years. .\nQuestion: what was the value of acquired technology?\nAnswer: 10700.0\nQuestion: what was the value of contract-based intangible assets?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "31000.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: cash and a commitment to fund the capital needs of the business until such time as its cumulative funding is equal to funding that we have provided from inception through the effective date of the transaction . the transaction created a new joint venture which does business as comercia global payments brazil . as a result of the transaction , we deconsolidated global payments brazil , and we apply the equity method of accounting to our retained interest in comercia global payments brazil . we recorded a gain on the transaction of $ 2.1 million which is included in interest and other income in the consolidated statement of income for the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2014 . the results of the brazil operation from inception until the restructuring into a joint venture on september 30 , 2013 were not material to our consolidated results of operations , and the assets and liabilities that we derecognized were not material to our consolidated balance sheet . american express portfolio on october 24 , 2013 , we acquired a merchant portfolio in the czech republic from american express limited for $ 1.9 million . the acquired assets have been classified as customer-related intangible assets and contract-based intangible assets with estimated amortization periods of 10 years . paypros on march 4 , 2014 , we completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding stock of payment processing , inc . ( 201cpaypros 201d ) for $ 420.0 million in cash plus $ 7.7 million in cash for working capital , subject to adjustment based on a final determination of working capital . we funded the acquisition with a combination of cash on hand and proceeds from our new term loan . paypros , based in california , is a provider of fully-integrated payment solutions for small-to-medium sized merchants in the united states . paypros delivers its products and services through a network of technology-based enterprise software partners to vertical markets that are complementary to the markets served by accelerated payment technologies ( 201capt 201d ) , which we acquired in october 2012 . we acquired paypros to expand our direct distribution capabilities in the united states and to further enhance our existing integrated solutions offerings . this acquisition was recorded as a business combination , and the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values . due to the timing of this transaction , the allocation of the purchase price is preliminary pending final valuation of intangible assets and deferred income taxes as well as resolution of the working capital settlement discussed above . the purchase price of paypros was determined by analyzing the historical and prospective financial statements . acquisition costs associated with this purchase were not material . the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocation ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 271577</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer-related intangible assets</td><td>147500</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contract-based intangible assets</td><td>31000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired technology</td><td>10700</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fixed assets</td><td>1680</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets</td><td>4230</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>466687</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-38949 ( 38949 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 427738</td></tr></table> the preliminary purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill , included in the north america merchant services segment , of $ 271.6 million . such goodwill is attributable primarily to synergies with the services offered and markets served by paypros . the goodwill associated with the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets and the contract-based intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 13 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 7 years. .\nQuestion: what was the value of acquired technology?\nAnswer: 10700.0\nQuestion: what was the value of contract-based intangible assets?\nAnswer: 31000.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "41700.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: cash and a commitment to fund the capital needs of the business until such time as its cumulative funding is equal to funding that we have provided from inception through the effective date of the transaction . the transaction created a new joint venture which does business as comercia global payments brazil . as a result of the transaction , we deconsolidated global payments brazil , and we apply the equity method of accounting to our retained interest in comercia global payments brazil . we recorded a gain on the transaction of $ 2.1 million which is included in interest and other income in the consolidated statement of income for the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2014 . the results of the brazil operation from inception until the restructuring into a joint venture on september 30 , 2013 were not material to our consolidated results of operations , and the assets and liabilities that we derecognized were not material to our consolidated balance sheet . american express portfolio on october 24 , 2013 , we acquired a merchant portfolio in the czech republic from american express limited for $ 1.9 million . the acquired assets have been classified as customer-related intangible assets and contract-based intangible assets with estimated amortization periods of 10 years . paypros on march 4 , 2014 , we completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding stock of payment processing , inc . ( 201cpaypros 201d ) for $ 420.0 million in cash plus $ 7.7 million in cash for working capital , subject to adjustment based on a final determination of working capital . we funded the acquisition with a combination of cash on hand and proceeds from our new term loan . paypros , based in california , is a provider of fully-integrated payment solutions for small-to-medium sized merchants in the united states . paypros delivers its products and services through a network of technology-based enterprise software partners to vertical markets that are complementary to the markets served by accelerated payment technologies ( 201capt 201d ) , which we acquired in october 2012 . we acquired paypros to expand our direct distribution capabilities in the united states and to further enhance our existing integrated solutions offerings . this acquisition was recorded as a business combination , and the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values . due to the timing of this transaction , the allocation of the purchase price is preliminary pending final valuation of intangible assets and deferred income taxes as well as resolution of the working capital settlement discussed above . the purchase price of paypros was determined by analyzing the historical and prospective financial statements . acquisition costs associated with this purchase were not material . the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocation ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 271577</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer-related intangible assets</td><td>147500</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contract-based intangible assets</td><td>31000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired technology</td><td>10700</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fixed assets</td><td>1680</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets</td><td>4230</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>466687</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-38949 ( 38949 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 427738</td></tr></table> the preliminary purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill , included in the north america merchant services segment , of $ 271.6 million . such goodwill is attributable primarily to synergies with the services offered and markets served by paypros . the goodwill associated with the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets and the contract-based intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 13 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 7 years. .\nQuestion: what was the value of acquired technology?\nAnswer: 10700.0\nQuestion: what was the value of contract-based intangible assets?\nAnswer: 31000.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 41700.0\nQuestion: what is the total sum, including customer-related intangible assets?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "189200.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: cash and a commitment to fund the capital needs of the business until such time as its cumulative funding is equal to funding that we have provided from inception through the effective date of the transaction . the transaction created a new joint venture which does business as comercia global payments brazil . as a result of the transaction , we deconsolidated global payments brazil , and we apply the equity method of accounting to our retained interest in comercia global payments brazil . we recorded a gain on the transaction of $ 2.1 million which is included in interest and other income in the consolidated statement of income for the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2014 . the results of the brazil operation from inception until the restructuring into a joint venture on september 30 , 2013 were not material to our consolidated results of operations , and the assets and liabilities that we derecognized were not material to our consolidated balance sheet . american express portfolio on october 24 , 2013 , we acquired a merchant portfolio in the czech republic from american express limited for $ 1.9 million . the acquired assets have been classified as customer-related intangible assets and contract-based intangible assets with estimated amortization periods of 10 years . paypros on march 4 , 2014 , we completed the acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding stock of payment processing , inc . ( 201cpaypros 201d ) for $ 420.0 million in cash plus $ 7.7 million in cash for working capital , subject to adjustment based on a final determination of working capital . we funded the acquisition with a combination of cash on hand and proceeds from our new term loan . paypros , based in california , is a provider of fully-integrated payment solutions for small-to-medium sized merchants in the united states . paypros delivers its products and services through a network of technology-based enterprise software partners to vertical markets that are complementary to the markets served by accelerated payment technologies ( 201capt 201d ) , which we acquired in october 2012 . we acquired paypros to expand our direct distribution capabilities in the united states and to further enhance our existing integrated solutions offerings . this acquisition was recorded as a business combination , and the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values . due to the timing of this transaction , the allocation of the purchase price is preliminary pending final valuation of intangible assets and deferred income taxes as well as resolution of the working capital settlement discussed above . the purchase price of paypros was determined by analyzing the historical and prospective financial statements . acquisition costs associated with this purchase were not material . the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocation ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>goodwill</td><td>$ 271577</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>customer-related intangible assets</td><td>147500</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contract-based intangible assets</td><td>31000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired technology</td><td>10700</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fixed assets</td><td>1680</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets</td><td>4230</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total assets acquired</td><td>466687</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-38949 ( 38949 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net assets acquired</td><td>$ 427738</td></tr></table> the preliminary purchase price allocation resulted in goodwill , included in the north america merchant services segment , of $ 271.6 million . such goodwill is attributable primarily to synergies with the services offered and markets served by paypros . the goodwill associated with the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes . the customer-related intangible assets and the contract-based intangible assets have an estimated amortization period of 13 years . the acquired technology has an estimated amortization period of 7 years. .\nQuestion: what was the value of acquired technology?\nAnswer: 10700.0\nQuestion: what was the value of contract-based intangible assets?\nAnswer: 31000.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 41700.0\nQuestion: what is the total sum, including customer-related intangible assets?\nAnswer: 189200.0\nQuestion: what is the proportion of these assets compared to total assets acquired?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.40541", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad operating in the u.s . our network includes 31868 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s . gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we own 26020 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although we provide and review revenue by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . the following table provides freight revenue by commodity group : millions 2012 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>agricultural</td><td>$ 3280</td><td>$ 3324</td><td>$ 3018</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>automotive</td><td>1807</td><td>1510</td><td>1271</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>chemicals</td><td>3238</td><td>2815</td><td>2425</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>coal</td><td>3912</td><td>4084</td><td>3489</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>industrial products</td><td>3494</td><td>3166</td><td>2639</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intermodal</td><td>3955</td><td>3609</td><td>3227</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total freight revenues</td><td>$ 19686</td><td>$ 18508</td><td>$ 16069</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other revenues</td><td>1240</td><td>1049</td><td>896</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total operatingrevenues</td><td>$ 20926</td><td>$ 19557</td><td>$ 16965</td></tr></table> although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported by us are outside the u.s . each of our commodity groups includes revenue from shipments to and from mexico . included in the above table are revenues from our mexico business which amounted to $ 1.9 billion in 2012 , $ 1.8 billion in 2011 , and $ 1.6 billion in 2010 . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . 2 . significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries . investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . all intercompany transactions are eliminated . we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements . cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less . accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts . the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions . receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position. .\nQuestion: what was the value of freight revenue from the agricultural group in 2012?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "3280.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad operating in the u.s . our network includes 31868 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s . gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we own 26020 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although we provide and review revenue by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . the following table provides freight revenue by commodity group : millions 2012 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>agricultural</td><td>$ 3280</td><td>$ 3324</td><td>$ 3018</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>automotive</td><td>1807</td><td>1510</td><td>1271</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>chemicals</td><td>3238</td><td>2815</td><td>2425</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>coal</td><td>3912</td><td>4084</td><td>3489</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>industrial products</td><td>3494</td><td>3166</td><td>2639</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intermodal</td><td>3955</td><td>3609</td><td>3227</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total freight revenues</td><td>$ 19686</td><td>$ 18508</td><td>$ 16069</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other revenues</td><td>1240</td><td>1049</td><td>896</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total operatingrevenues</td><td>$ 20926</td><td>$ 19557</td><td>$ 16965</td></tr></table> although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported by us are outside the u.s . each of our commodity groups includes revenue from shipments to and from mexico . included in the above table are revenues from our mexico business which amounted to $ 1.9 billion in 2012 , $ 1.8 billion in 2011 , and $ 1.6 billion in 2010 . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . 2 . significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries . investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . all intercompany transactions are eliminated . we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements . cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less . accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts . the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions . receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position. .\nQuestion: what was the value of freight revenue from the agricultural group in 2012?\nAnswer: 3280.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2011?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "3324.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad operating in the u.s . our network includes 31868 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s . gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we own 26020 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although we provide and review revenue by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . the following table provides freight revenue by commodity group : millions 2012 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>agricultural</td><td>$ 3280</td><td>$ 3324</td><td>$ 3018</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>automotive</td><td>1807</td><td>1510</td><td>1271</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>chemicals</td><td>3238</td><td>2815</td><td>2425</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>coal</td><td>3912</td><td>4084</td><td>3489</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>industrial products</td><td>3494</td><td>3166</td><td>2639</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intermodal</td><td>3955</td><td>3609</td><td>3227</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total freight revenues</td><td>$ 19686</td><td>$ 18508</td><td>$ 16069</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other revenues</td><td>1240</td><td>1049</td><td>896</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total operatingrevenues</td><td>$ 20926</td><td>$ 19557</td><td>$ 16965</td></tr></table> although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported by us are outside the u.s . each of our commodity groups includes revenue from shipments to and from mexico . included in the above table are revenues from our mexico business which amounted to $ 1.9 billion in 2012 , $ 1.8 billion in 2011 , and $ 1.6 billion in 2010 . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . 2 . significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries . investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . all intercompany transactions are eliminated . we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements . cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less . accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts . the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions . receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position. .\nQuestion: what was the value of freight revenue from the agricultural group in 2012?\nAnswer: 3280.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2011?\nAnswer: 3324.0\nQuestion: what is the ratio of 2012 to 2011?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.98676", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad operating in the u.s . our network includes 31868 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s . gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we own 26020 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although we provide and review revenue by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . the following table provides freight revenue by commodity group : millions 2012 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>agricultural</td><td>$ 3280</td><td>$ 3324</td><td>$ 3018</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>automotive</td><td>1807</td><td>1510</td><td>1271</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>chemicals</td><td>3238</td><td>2815</td><td>2425</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>coal</td><td>3912</td><td>4084</td><td>3489</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>industrial products</td><td>3494</td><td>3166</td><td>2639</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intermodal</td><td>3955</td><td>3609</td><td>3227</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total freight revenues</td><td>$ 19686</td><td>$ 18508</td><td>$ 16069</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other revenues</td><td>1240</td><td>1049</td><td>896</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total operatingrevenues</td><td>$ 20926</td><td>$ 19557</td><td>$ 16965</td></tr></table> although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported by us are outside the u.s . each of our commodity groups includes revenue from shipments to and from mexico . included in the above table are revenues from our mexico business which amounted to $ 1.9 billion in 2012 , $ 1.8 billion in 2011 , and $ 1.6 billion in 2010 . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . 2 . significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries . investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . all intercompany transactions are eliminated . we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements . cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less . accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts . the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions . receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position. .\nQuestion: what was the value of freight revenue from the agricultural group in 2012?\nAnswer: 3280.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2011?\nAnswer: 3324.0\nQuestion: what is the ratio of 2012 to 2011?\nAnswer: 0.98676\nQuestion: what is the ratio of the value of freight revenue from the automotive group, 2012 to 2011?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "1.19669", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad operating in the u.s . our network includes 31868 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern u.s . gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we own 26020 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . we serve the western two-thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although we provide and review revenue by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . the following table provides freight revenue by commodity group : millions 2012 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>agricultural</td><td>$ 3280</td><td>$ 3324</td><td>$ 3018</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>automotive</td><td>1807</td><td>1510</td><td>1271</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>chemicals</td><td>3238</td><td>2815</td><td>2425</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>coal</td><td>3912</td><td>4084</td><td>3489</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>industrial products</td><td>3494</td><td>3166</td><td>2639</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>intermodal</td><td>3955</td><td>3609</td><td>3227</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total freight revenues</td><td>$ 19686</td><td>$ 18508</td><td>$ 16069</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other revenues</td><td>1240</td><td>1049</td><td>896</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total operatingrevenues</td><td>$ 20926</td><td>$ 19557</td><td>$ 16965</td></tr></table> although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the u.s. , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported by us are outside the u.s . each of our commodity groups includes revenue from shipments to and from mexico . included in the above table are revenues from our mexico business which amounted to $ 1.9 billion in 2012 , $ 1.8 billion in 2011 , and $ 1.6 billion in 2010 . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . 2 . significant accounting policies principles of consolidation 2013 the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of union pacific corporation and all of its subsidiaries . investments in affiliated companies ( 20% ( 20 % ) to 50% ( 50 % ) owned ) are accounted for using the equity method of accounting . all intercompany transactions are eliminated . we currently have no less than majority-owned investments that require consolidation under variable interest entity requirements . cash and cash equivalents 2013 cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of three months or less . accounts receivable 2013 accounts receivable includes receivables reduced by an allowance for doubtful accounts . the allowance is based upon historical losses , credit worthiness of customers , and current economic conditions . receivables not expected to be collected in one year and the associated allowances are classified as other assets in our consolidated statements of financial position. .\nQuestion: what was the value of freight revenue from the agricultural group in 2012?\nAnswer: 3280.0\nQuestion: what was the value in 2011?\nAnswer: 3324.0\nQuestion: what is the ratio of 2012 to 2011?\nAnswer: 0.98676\nQuestion: what is the ratio of the value of freight revenue from the automotive group, 2012 to 2011?\nAnswer: 1.19669\nQuestion: is ratio 1 greater than 2?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "no", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: shareholder value award program svas are granted to officers and management and are payable in shares of our common stock . the number of shares actually issued , if any , varies depending on our stock price at the end of the three-year vesting period compared to pre-established target stock prices . we measure the fair value of the sva unit on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation model . the model utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the award grant and calculates the fair value of the award . expected volatilities utilized in the model are based on implied volatilities from traded options on our stock , historical volatility of our stock price , and other factors . similarly , the dividend yield is based on historical experience and our estimate of future dividend yields . the risk-free interest rate is derived from the u.s . treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant . the weighted-average fair values of the sva units granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 48.51 , $ 66.25 , and $ 48.68 , respectively , determined using the following assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( percents )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.00% ( 2.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.31</td><td>1.38</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>22.26</td><td>22.91</td><td>21.68</td></tr></table> pursuant to this program , approximately 0.7 million shares , 1.1 million shares , and 1.0 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 1.0 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested svas was $ 55.7 million , which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of 20 months . restricted stock units rsus are granted to certain employees and are payable in shares of our common stock . rsu shares are accounted for at fair value based upon the closing stock price on the date of grant . the corresponding expense is amortized over the vesting period , typically three years . the fair values of rsu awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 70.95 , $ 72.47 , and $ 71.46 , respectively . the number of shares ultimately issued for the rsu program remains constant with the exception of forfeitures . pursuant to this program , 1.3 million , 1.4 million , and 1.3 million shares were granted and approximately 1.0 million , 0.9 million , and 0.6 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 0.8 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested rsus was $ 112.2 million , which will be amortized over the weighted- average remaining requisite service period of 21 months . note 12 : shareholders' equity during 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , we repurchased $ 4.15 billion , $ 359.8 million and $ 540.1 million , respectively , of shares associated with our share repurchase programs . a payment of $ 60.0 million was made in 2016 for shares repurchased in 2017 . during 2018 , we repurchased $ 2.05 billion of shares , which completed the $ 5.00 billion share repurchase program announced in october 2013 and our board authorized an $ 8.00 billion share repurchase program . there were $ 2.10 billion repurchased under the $ 8.00 billion program in 2018 . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were $ 5.90 billion of shares remaining under the 2018 program . we have 5.0 million authorized shares of preferred stock . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , no preferred stock was issued . we have an employee benefit trust that held 50.0 million shares of our common stock at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , to provide a source of funds to assist us in meeting our obligations under various employee benefit plans . the cost basis of the shares held in the trust was $ 3.01 billion at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , and is shown as a reduction of shareholders 2019 equity . any dividend transactions between us and the trust are eliminated . stock held by the trust is not considered outstanding in the computation of eps . the assets of the trust were not used to fund any of our obligations under these employee benefit plans during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and .\nQuestion: from 2016 to 2017, what was the variation in the total amount spent on share repurchase?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "-180.3", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: shareholder value award program svas are granted to officers and management and are payable in shares of our common stock . the number of shares actually issued , if any , varies depending on our stock price at the end of the three-year vesting period compared to pre-established target stock prices . we measure the fair value of the sva unit on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation model . the model utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the award grant and calculates the fair value of the award . expected volatilities utilized in the model are based on implied volatilities from traded options on our stock , historical volatility of our stock price , and other factors . similarly , the dividend yield is based on historical experience and our estimate of future dividend yields . the risk-free interest rate is derived from the u.s . treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant . the weighted-average fair values of the sva units granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 48.51 , $ 66.25 , and $ 48.68 , respectively , determined using the following assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( percents )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.00% ( 2.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.31</td><td>1.38</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>22.26</td><td>22.91</td><td>21.68</td></tr></table> pursuant to this program , approximately 0.7 million shares , 1.1 million shares , and 1.0 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 1.0 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested svas was $ 55.7 million , which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of 20 months . restricted stock units rsus are granted to certain employees and are payable in shares of our common stock . rsu shares are accounted for at fair value based upon the closing stock price on the date of grant . the corresponding expense is amortized over the vesting period , typically three years . the fair values of rsu awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 70.95 , $ 72.47 , and $ 71.46 , respectively . the number of shares ultimately issued for the rsu program remains constant with the exception of forfeitures . pursuant to this program , 1.3 million , 1.4 million , and 1.3 million shares were granted and approximately 1.0 million , 0.9 million , and 0.6 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 0.8 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested rsus was $ 112.2 million , which will be amortized over the weighted- average remaining requisite service period of 21 months . note 12 : shareholders' equity during 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , we repurchased $ 4.15 billion , $ 359.8 million and $ 540.1 million , respectively , of shares associated with our share repurchase programs . a payment of $ 60.0 million was made in 2016 for shares repurchased in 2017 . during 2018 , we repurchased $ 2.05 billion of shares , which completed the $ 5.00 billion share repurchase program announced in october 2013 and our board authorized an $ 8.00 billion share repurchase program . there were $ 2.10 billion repurchased under the $ 8.00 billion program in 2018 . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were $ 5.90 billion of shares remaining under the 2018 program . we have 5.0 million authorized shares of preferred stock . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , no preferred stock was issued . we have an employee benefit trust that held 50.0 million shares of our common stock at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , to provide a source of funds to assist us in meeting our obligations under various employee benefit plans . the cost basis of the shares held in the trust was $ 3.01 billion at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , and is shown as a reduction of shareholders 2019 equity . any dividend transactions between us and the trust are eliminated . stock held by the trust is not considered outstanding in the computation of eps . the assets of the trust were not used to fund any of our obligations under these employee benefit plans during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and .\nQuestion: from 2016 to 2017, what was the variation in the total amount spent on share repurchase?\nAnswer: -180.3\nQuestion: and what is this variation as a percentage of that amount in 2016?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "-0.33383", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: shareholder value award program svas are granted to officers and management and are payable in shares of our common stock . the number of shares actually issued , if any , varies depending on our stock price at the end of the three-year vesting period compared to pre-established target stock prices . we measure the fair value of the sva unit on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation model . the model utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the award grant and calculates the fair value of the award . expected volatilities utilized in the model are based on implied volatilities from traded options on our stock , historical volatility of our stock price , and other factors . similarly , the dividend yield is based on historical experience and our estimate of future dividend yields . the risk-free interest rate is derived from the u.s . treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant . the weighted-average fair values of the sva units granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 48.51 , $ 66.25 , and $ 48.68 , respectively , determined using the following assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( percents )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.00% ( 2.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.31</td><td>1.38</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>22.26</td><td>22.91</td><td>21.68</td></tr></table> pursuant to this program , approximately 0.7 million shares , 1.1 million shares , and 1.0 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 1.0 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested svas was $ 55.7 million , which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of 20 months . restricted stock units rsus are granted to certain employees and are payable in shares of our common stock . rsu shares are accounted for at fair value based upon the closing stock price on the date of grant . the corresponding expense is amortized over the vesting period , typically three years . the fair values of rsu awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 70.95 , $ 72.47 , and $ 71.46 , respectively . the number of shares ultimately issued for the rsu program remains constant with the exception of forfeitures . pursuant to this program , 1.3 million , 1.4 million , and 1.3 million shares were granted and approximately 1.0 million , 0.9 million , and 0.6 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 0.8 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested rsus was $ 112.2 million , which will be amortized over the weighted- average remaining requisite service period of 21 months . note 12 : shareholders' equity during 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , we repurchased $ 4.15 billion , $ 359.8 million and $ 540.1 million , respectively , of shares associated with our share repurchase programs . a payment of $ 60.0 million was made in 2016 for shares repurchased in 2017 . during 2018 , we repurchased $ 2.05 billion of shares , which completed the $ 5.00 billion share repurchase program announced in october 2013 and our board authorized an $ 8.00 billion share repurchase program . there were $ 2.10 billion repurchased under the $ 8.00 billion program in 2018 . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were $ 5.90 billion of shares remaining under the 2018 program . we have 5.0 million authorized shares of preferred stock . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , no preferred stock was issued . we have an employee benefit trust that held 50.0 million shares of our common stock at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , to provide a source of funds to assist us in meeting our obligations under various employee benefit plans . the cost basis of the shares held in the trust was $ 3.01 billion at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , and is shown as a reduction of shareholders 2019 equity . any dividend transactions between us and the trust are eliminated . stock held by the trust is not considered outstanding in the computation of eps . the assets of the trust were not used to fund any of our obligations under these employee benefit plans during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and .\nQuestion: from 2016 to 2017, what was the variation in the total amount spent on share repurchase?\nAnswer: -180.3\nQuestion: and what is this variation as a percentage of that amount in 2016?\nAnswer: -0.33383\nQuestion: and over the next year, what was that variation in this amount, counted in millions?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "3790.2", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: shareholder value award program svas are granted to officers and management and are payable in shares of our common stock . the number of shares actually issued , if any , varies depending on our stock price at the end of the three-year vesting period compared to pre-established target stock prices . we measure the fair value of the sva unit on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation model . the model utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the award grant and calculates the fair value of the award . expected volatilities utilized in the model are based on implied volatilities from traded options on our stock , historical volatility of our stock price , and other factors . similarly , the dividend yield is based on historical experience and our estimate of future dividend yields . the risk-free interest rate is derived from the u.s . treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant . the weighted-average fair values of the sva units granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 48.51 , $ 66.25 , and $ 48.68 , respectively , determined using the following assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( percents )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.00% ( 2.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.31</td><td>1.38</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>22.26</td><td>22.91</td><td>21.68</td></tr></table> pursuant to this program , approximately 0.7 million shares , 1.1 million shares , and 1.0 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 1.0 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested svas was $ 55.7 million , which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of 20 months . restricted stock units rsus are granted to certain employees and are payable in shares of our common stock . rsu shares are accounted for at fair value based upon the closing stock price on the date of grant . the corresponding expense is amortized over the vesting period , typically three years . the fair values of rsu awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 70.95 , $ 72.47 , and $ 71.46 , respectively . the number of shares ultimately issued for the rsu program remains constant with the exception of forfeitures . pursuant to this program , 1.3 million , 1.4 million , and 1.3 million shares were granted and approximately 1.0 million , 0.9 million , and 0.6 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 0.8 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested rsus was $ 112.2 million , which will be amortized over the weighted- average remaining requisite service period of 21 months . note 12 : shareholders' equity during 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , we repurchased $ 4.15 billion , $ 359.8 million and $ 540.1 million , respectively , of shares associated with our share repurchase programs . a payment of $ 60.0 million was made in 2016 for shares repurchased in 2017 . during 2018 , we repurchased $ 2.05 billion of shares , which completed the $ 5.00 billion share repurchase program announced in october 2013 and our board authorized an $ 8.00 billion share repurchase program . there were $ 2.10 billion repurchased under the $ 8.00 billion program in 2018 . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were $ 5.90 billion of shares remaining under the 2018 program . we have 5.0 million authorized shares of preferred stock . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , no preferred stock was issued . we have an employee benefit trust that held 50.0 million shares of our common stock at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , to provide a source of funds to assist us in meeting our obligations under various employee benefit plans . the cost basis of the shares held in the trust was $ 3.01 billion at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , and is shown as a reduction of shareholders 2019 equity . any dividend transactions between us and the trust are eliminated . stock held by the trust is not considered outstanding in the computation of eps . the assets of the trust were not used to fund any of our obligations under these employee benefit plans during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and .\nQuestion: from 2016 to 2017, what was the variation in the total amount spent on share repurchase?\nAnswer: -180.3\nQuestion: and what is this variation as a percentage of that amount in 2016?\nAnswer: -0.33383\nQuestion: and over the next year, what was that variation in this amount, counted in millions?\nAnswer: 3790.2\nQuestion: and what percentage did this variation represent in relation to the 2017 amount spent on share repurchase?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "10.53419", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase in electricity usage in the residential and commercial sectors due in part to a 4% ( 4 % ) increase in the average number of residential customers and a 3% ( 3 % ) increase in the average number of commercial customers , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales . gross operating revenues gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to : a decrease of $ 16.2 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates ; a decrease of $ 15.4 million in gross gas revenues primarily due to lower fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of lower fuel rates and the effect of milder weather ; and formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 , as discussed above . the decrease was partially offset by an increase in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and more favorable volume/weather , as discussed above . 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 net revenue</td><td>$ 243.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>17.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gas revenue</td><td>14.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of 2009 rate case settlement</td><td>-6.6 ( 6.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>5.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 272.9</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 348 gwh , or 7% ( 7 % ) , in billed retail electricity usage primarily due to more favorable weather compared to last year . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to more favorable weather compared to last year , along with the recognition of a gas regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plans . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the formula rate plan settlement . the effect of 2009 rate case settlement variance results from the april 2009 settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s rate case , and includes the effects of realigning non-fuel costs associated with the operation of grand gulf from the fuel adjustment clause to electric base rates effective june 2009 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement . other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to the deferral in 2011 of $ 13.4 million of 2010 michoud plant maintenance costs pursuant to the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s 2010 test year formula rate plan filing approved by the city council in september 2011 and a decrease of $ 8.0 million in fossil- fueled generation expenses due to higher plant outage costs in 2010 due to a greater scope of work at the michoud plant . see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the 2010 test year formula rate plan filing. .\nQuestion: what was the total net revenue for 2009 and 2010?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "515.9", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase in electricity usage in the residential and commercial sectors due in part to a 4% ( 4 % ) increase in the average number of residential customers and a 3% ( 3 % ) increase in the average number of commercial customers , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales . gross operating revenues gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to : a decrease of $ 16.2 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates ; a decrease of $ 15.4 million in gross gas revenues primarily due to lower fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of lower fuel rates and the effect of milder weather ; and formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 , as discussed above . the decrease was partially offset by an increase in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and more favorable volume/weather , as discussed above . 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 net revenue</td><td>$ 243.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>17.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gas revenue</td><td>14.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of 2009 rate case settlement</td><td>-6.6 ( 6.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>5.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 272.9</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 348 gwh , or 7% ( 7 % ) , in billed retail electricity usage primarily due to more favorable weather compared to last year . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to more favorable weather compared to last year , along with the recognition of a gas regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plans . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the formula rate plan settlement . the effect of 2009 rate case settlement variance results from the april 2009 settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s rate case , and includes the effects of realigning non-fuel costs associated with the operation of grand gulf from the fuel adjustment clause to electric base rates effective june 2009 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement . other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to the deferral in 2011 of $ 13.4 million of 2010 michoud plant maintenance costs pursuant to the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s 2010 test year formula rate plan filing approved by the city council in september 2011 and a decrease of $ 8.0 million in fossil- fueled generation expenses due to higher plant outage costs in 2010 due to a greater scope of work at the michoud plant . see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the 2010 test year formula rate plan filing. .\nQuestion: what was the total net revenue for 2009 and 2010?\nAnswer: 515.9\nQuestion: and the change in net revenue between these two years?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "29.9", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase in electricity usage in the residential and commercial sectors due in part to a 4% ( 4 % ) increase in the average number of residential customers and a 3% ( 3 % ) increase in the average number of commercial customers , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales . gross operating revenues gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to : a decrease of $ 16.2 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates ; a decrease of $ 15.4 million in gross gas revenues primarily due to lower fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of lower fuel rates and the effect of milder weather ; and formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 , as discussed above . the decrease was partially offset by an increase in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and more favorable volume/weather , as discussed above . 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009 net revenue</td><td>$ 243.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>17.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gas revenue</td><td>14.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>effect of 2009 rate case settlement</td><td>-6.6 ( 6.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>5.3</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$ 272.9</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 348 gwh , or 7% ( 7 % ) , in billed retail electricity usage primarily due to more favorable weather compared to last year . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to more favorable weather compared to last year , along with the recognition of a gas regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plans . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the formula rate plan settlement . the effect of 2009 rate case settlement variance results from the april 2009 settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s rate case , and includes the effects of realigning non-fuel costs associated with the operation of grand gulf from the fuel adjustment clause to electric base rates effective june 2009 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement . other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to the deferral in 2011 of $ 13.4 million of 2010 michoud plant maintenance costs pursuant to the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s 2010 test year formula rate plan filing approved by the city council in september 2011 and a decrease of $ 8.0 million in fossil- fueled generation expenses due to higher plant outage costs in 2010 due to a greater scope of work at the michoud plant . see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the 2010 test year formula rate plan filing. .\nQuestion: what was the total net revenue for 2009 and 2010?\nAnswer: 515.9\nQuestion: and the change in net revenue between these two years?\nAnswer: 29.9\nQuestion: so what was the growth rate of this value during this time?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.12305", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: contributions and future benefit payments we expect to make contributions of $ 28.1 million to our defined benefit , other postretirement , and postemployment benefits plans in fiscal 2009 . actual 2009 contributions could exceed our current projections , as influenced by our decision to undertake discretionary funding of our benefit trusts versus other competing investment priorities and future changes in government requirements . estimated benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid from fiscal 2009-2018 as follows : in millions defined benefit pension postretirement benefit plans gross payments medicare subsidy receipts postemployment benefit ......................................................................................................................................................................................... . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>defined benefit pension plans</td><td>other postretirement benefit plans gross payments</td><td>medicare subsidy receipts</td><td>postemployment benefit plans</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 176.3</td><td>$ 56.0</td><td>$ -6.1 ( 6.1 )</td><td>$ 16.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>182.5</td><td>59.9</td><td>-6.7 ( 6.7 )</td><td>17.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>189.8</td><td>63.3</td><td>-7.3 ( 7.3 )</td><td>18.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>197.5</td><td>67.0</td><td>-8.0 ( 8.0 )</td><td>18.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>206.6</td><td>71.7</td><td>-8.7 ( 8.7 )</td><td>19.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2014 2013 2018</td><td>1187.3</td><td>406.8</td><td>-55.3 ( 55.3 )</td><td>106.3</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans the general mills savings plan is a defined contribution plan that covers salaried and nonunion employees . it had net assets of $ 2309.9 million as of may 25 , 2008 and $ 2303.0 million as of may 27 , 2007.this plan is a 401 ( k ) savings plan that includes a number of investment funds and an employee stock ownership plan ( esop ) . we sponsor another savings plan for certain hourly employees with net assets of $ 16.0 million as of may 25 , 2008 . our total recognized expense related to defined contribution plans was $ 61.9 million in fiscal 2008 , $ 48.3 million in fiscal 2007 , and $ 45.5 million in fiscal 2006 . the esop originally purchased our common stock principally with funds borrowed from third parties and guaranteed by us.the esop shares are included in net shares outstanding for the purposes of calculating eps . the esop 2019s third-party debt was repaid on june 30 , 2007 . the esop 2019s only assets are our common stock and temporary cash balances.the esop 2019s share of the total defined contribution expense was $ 52.3 million in fiscal 2008 , $ 40.1 million in fiscal 2007 , and $ 37.6 million in fiscal 2006 . the esop 2019s expensewas calculated by the 201cshares allocated 201dmethod . the esop used our common stock to convey benefits to employees and , through increased stock ownership , to further align employee interests with those of stockholders.wematched a percentage of employee contributions to the general mills savings plan with a base match plus a variable year end match that depended on annual results . employees received our match in the form of common stock . our cash contribution to the esop was calculated so as to pay off enough debt to release sufficient shares to make our match . the esop used our cash contributions to the plan , plus the dividends received on the esop 2019s leveraged shares , to make principal and interest payments on the esop 2019s debt . as loan payments were made , shares became unencumbered by debt and were committed to be allocated . the esop allocated shares to individual employee accounts on the basis of the match of employee payroll savings ( contributions ) , plus reinvested dividends received on previously allocated shares . the esop incurred net interest of less than $ 1.0 million in each of fiscal 2007 and 2006 . the esop used dividends of $ 2.5 million in fiscal 2007 and $ 3.9 million in 2006 , along with our contributions of less than $ 1.0 million in each of fiscal 2007 and 2006 to make interest and principal payments . the number of shares of our common stock allocated to participants in the esop was 5.2 million as of may 25 , 2008 , and 5.4 million as of may 27 , 2007 . annual report 2008 81 .\nQuestion: what was the total recognized expense related to defined contribution plans for the years of 2007 and 2008, combined?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "110.2", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: contributions and future benefit payments we expect to make contributions of $ 28.1 million to our defined benefit , other postretirement , and postemployment benefits plans in fiscal 2009 . actual 2009 contributions could exceed our current projections , as influenced by our decision to undertake discretionary funding of our benefit trusts versus other competing investment priorities and future changes in government requirements . estimated benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid from fiscal 2009-2018 as follows : in millions defined benefit pension postretirement benefit plans gross payments medicare subsidy receipts postemployment benefit ......................................................................................................................................................................................... . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>defined benefit pension plans</td><td>other postretirement benefit plans gross payments</td><td>medicare subsidy receipts</td><td>postemployment benefit plans</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 176.3</td><td>$ 56.0</td><td>$ -6.1 ( 6.1 )</td><td>$ 16.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>182.5</td><td>59.9</td><td>-6.7 ( 6.7 )</td><td>17.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>189.8</td><td>63.3</td><td>-7.3 ( 7.3 )</td><td>18.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>197.5</td><td>67.0</td><td>-8.0 ( 8.0 )</td><td>18.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>206.6</td><td>71.7</td><td>-8.7 ( 8.7 )</td><td>19.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2014 2013 2018</td><td>1187.3</td><td>406.8</td><td>-55.3 ( 55.3 )</td><td>106.3</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans the general mills savings plan is a defined contribution plan that covers salaried and nonunion employees . it had net assets of $ 2309.9 million as of may 25 , 2008 and $ 2303.0 million as of may 27 , 2007.this plan is a 401 ( k ) savings plan that includes a number of investment funds and an employee stock ownership plan ( esop ) . we sponsor another savings plan for certain hourly employees with net assets of $ 16.0 million as of may 25 , 2008 . our total recognized expense related to defined contribution plans was $ 61.9 million in fiscal 2008 , $ 48.3 million in fiscal 2007 , and $ 45.5 million in fiscal 2006 . the esop originally purchased our common stock principally with funds borrowed from third parties and guaranteed by us.the esop shares are included in net shares outstanding for the purposes of calculating eps . the esop 2019s third-party debt was repaid on june 30 , 2007 . the esop 2019s only assets are our common stock and temporary cash balances.the esop 2019s share of the total defined contribution expense was $ 52.3 million in fiscal 2008 , $ 40.1 million in fiscal 2007 , and $ 37.6 million in fiscal 2006 . the esop 2019s expensewas calculated by the 201cshares allocated 201dmethod . the esop used our common stock to convey benefits to employees and , through increased stock ownership , to further align employee interests with those of stockholders.wematched a percentage of employee contributions to the general mills savings plan with a base match plus a variable year end match that depended on annual results . employees received our match in the form of common stock . our cash contribution to the esop was calculated so as to pay off enough debt to release sufficient shares to make our match . the esop used our cash contributions to the plan , plus the dividends received on the esop 2019s leveraged shares , to make principal and interest payments on the esop 2019s debt . as loan payments were made , shares became unencumbered by debt and were committed to be allocated . the esop allocated shares to individual employee accounts on the basis of the match of employee payroll savings ( contributions ) , plus reinvested dividends received on previously allocated shares . the esop incurred net interest of less than $ 1.0 million in each of fiscal 2007 and 2006 . the esop used dividends of $ 2.5 million in fiscal 2007 and $ 3.9 million in 2006 , along with our contributions of less than $ 1.0 million in each of fiscal 2007 and 2006 to make interest and principal payments . the number of shares of our common stock allocated to participants in the esop was 5.2 million as of may 25 , 2008 , and 5.4 million as of may 27 , 2007 . annual report 2008 81 .\nQuestion: what was the total recognized expense related to defined contribution plans for the years of 2007 and 2008, combined?\nAnswer: 110.2\nQuestion: including the year of 2016, what then becomes the total?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "155.7", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: contributions and future benefit payments we expect to make contributions of $ 28.1 million to our defined benefit , other postretirement , and postemployment benefits plans in fiscal 2009 . actual 2009 contributions could exceed our current projections , as influenced by our decision to undertake discretionary funding of our benefit trusts versus other competing investment priorities and future changes in government requirements . estimated benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid from fiscal 2009-2018 as follows : in millions defined benefit pension postretirement benefit plans gross payments medicare subsidy receipts postemployment benefit ......................................................................................................................................................................................... . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>defined benefit pension plans</td><td>other postretirement benefit plans gross payments</td><td>medicare subsidy receipts</td><td>postemployment benefit plans</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2009</td><td>$ 176.3</td><td>$ 56.0</td><td>$ -6.1 ( 6.1 )</td><td>$ 16.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2010</td><td>182.5</td><td>59.9</td><td>-6.7 ( 6.7 )</td><td>17.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2011</td><td>189.8</td><td>63.3</td><td>-7.3 ( 7.3 )</td><td>18.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>197.5</td><td>67.0</td><td>-8.0 ( 8.0 )</td><td>18.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>206.6</td><td>71.7</td><td>-8.7 ( 8.7 )</td><td>19.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2014 2013 2018</td><td>1187.3</td><td>406.8</td><td>-55.3 ( 55.3 )</td><td>106.3</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans the general mills savings plan is a defined contribution plan that covers salaried and nonunion employees . it had net assets of $ 2309.9 million as of may 25 , 2008 and $ 2303.0 million as of may 27 , 2007.this plan is a 401 ( k ) savings plan that includes a number of investment funds and an employee stock ownership plan ( esop ) . we sponsor another savings plan for certain hourly employees with net assets of $ 16.0 million as of may 25 , 2008 . our total recognized expense related to defined contribution plans was $ 61.9 million in fiscal 2008 , $ 48.3 million in fiscal 2007 , and $ 45.5 million in fiscal 2006 . the esop originally purchased our common stock principally with funds borrowed from third parties and guaranteed by us.the esop shares are included in net shares outstanding for the purposes of calculating eps . the esop 2019s third-party debt was repaid on june 30 , 2007 . the esop 2019s only assets are our common stock and temporary cash balances.the esop 2019s share of the total defined contribution expense was $ 52.3 million in fiscal 2008 , $ 40.1 million in fiscal 2007 , and $ 37.6 million in fiscal 2006 . the esop 2019s expensewas calculated by the 201cshares allocated 201dmethod . the esop used our common stock to convey benefits to employees and , through increased stock ownership , to further align employee interests with those of stockholders.wematched a percentage of employee contributions to the general mills savings plan with a base match plus a variable year end match that depended on annual results . employees received our match in the form of common stock . our cash contribution to the esop was calculated so as to pay off enough debt to release sufficient shares to make our match . the esop used our cash contributions to the plan , plus the dividends received on the esop 2019s leveraged shares , to make principal and interest payments on the esop 2019s debt . as loan payments were made , shares became unencumbered by debt and were committed to be allocated . the esop allocated shares to individual employee accounts on the basis of the match of employee payroll savings ( contributions ) , plus reinvested dividends received on previously allocated shares . the esop incurred net interest of less than $ 1.0 million in each of fiscal 2007 and 2006 . the esop used dividends of $ 2.5 million in fiscal 2007 and $ 3.9 million in 2006 , along with our contributions of less than $ 1.0 million in each of fiscal 2007 and 2006 to make interest and principal payments . the number of shares of our common stock allocated to participants in the esop was 5.2 million as of may 25 , 2008 , and 5.4 million as of may 27 , 2007 . annual report 2008 81 .\nQuestion: what was the total recognized expense related to defined contribution plans for the years of 2007 and 2008, combined?\nAnswer: 110.2\nQuestion: including the year of 2016, what then becomes the total?\nAnswer: 155.7\nQuestion: and what is the average recognized expense related to defined contribution plans between those three years?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "51.9", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the allocation of the purchase price was finalized during the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the following table summarizes the allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : purchase price allocation . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>final purchase price allocation</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-current assets</td><td>$ 2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>property and equipment</td><td>3590</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>intangible assets ( 1 )</td><td>1062</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other non-current liabilities</td><td>-91 ( 91 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value of net assets acquired</td><td>$ 4563</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>goodwill ( 2 )</td><td>89</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 0.4 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 0.7 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . colombia 2014colombia movil acquisition 2014on july 17 , 2011 , the company entered into a definitive agreement with colombia movil s.a . e.s.p . ( 201ccolombia movil 201d ) , whereby atc sitios infraco , s.a.s. , a colombian subsidiary of the company ( 201catc infraco 201d ) , would purchase up to 2126 communications sites from colombia movil for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $ 182.0 million . from december 21 , 2011 through the year ended december 31 , 2012 , atc infraco completed the purchase of 1526 communications sites for an aggregate purchase price of $ 136.2 million ( including contingent consideration of $ 17.3 million ) , subject to post-closing adjustments . through a subsidiary , millicom international cellular s.a . ( 201cmillicom 201d ) exercised its option to acquire an indirect , substantial non-controlling interest in atc infraco . under the terms of the agreement , the company is required to make additional payments upon the conversion of certain barter agreements with other wireless carriers to cash paying lease agreements . based on the company 2019s current estimates , the value of potential contingent consideration payments required to be made under the amended agreement is expected to be between zero and $ 32.8 million and is estimated to be $ 17.3 million using a probability weighted average of the expected outcomes at december 31 , 2012 . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , the company recorded a reduction in fair value of $ 1.2 million , which is included in other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. .\nQuestion: on july 17, 2011, what was the aggregate purchase price of the communications sites acquired from colombia movil?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "182.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the allocation of the purchase price was finalized during the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the following table summarizes the allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : purchase price allocation . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>final purchase price allocation</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-current assets</td><td>$ 2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>property and equipment</td><td>3590</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>intangible assets ( 1 )</td><td>1062</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other non-current liabilities</td><td>-91 ( 91 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value of net assets acquired</td><td>$ 4563</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>goodwill ( 2 )</td><td>89</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 0.4 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 0.7 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . colombia 2014colombia movil acquisition 2014on july 17 , 2011 , the company entered into a definitive agreement with colombia movil s.a . e.s.p . ( 201ccolombia movil 201d ) , whereby atc sitios infraco , s.a.s. , a colombian subsidiary of the company ( 201catc infraco 201d ) , would purchase up to 2126 communications sites from colombia movil for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $ 182.0 million . from december 21 , 2011 through the year ended december 31 , 2012 , atc infraco completed the purchase of 1526 communications sites for an aggregate purchase price of $ 136.2 million ( including contingent consideration of $ 17.3 million ) , subject to post-closing adjustments . through a subsidiary , millicom international cellular s.a . ( 201cmillicom 201d ) exercised its option to acquire an indirect , substantial non-controlling interest in atc infraco . under the terms of the agreement , the company is required to make additional payments upon the conversion of certain barter agreements with other wireless carriers to cash paying lease agreements . based on the company 2019s current estimates , the value of potential contingent consideration payments required to be made under the amended agreement is expected to be between zero and $ 32.8 million and is estimated to be $ 17.3 million using a probability weighted average of the expected outcomes at december 31 , 2012 . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , the company recorded a reduction in fair value of $ 1.2 million , which is included in other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. .\nQuestion: on july 17, 2011, what was the aggregate purchase price of the communications sites acquired from colombia movil?\nAnswer: 182.0\nQuestion: and what was the number of those sites?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "2126.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the allocation of the purchase price was finalized during the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the following table summarizes the allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : purchase price allocation . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>final purchase price allocation</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-current assets</td><td>$ 2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>property and equipment</td><td>3590</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>intangible assets ( 1 )</td><td>1062</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other non-current liabilities</td><td>-91 ( 91 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value of net assets acquired</td><td>$ 4563</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>goodwill ( 2 )</td><td>89</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 0.4 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 0.7 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . colombia 2014colombia movil acquisition 2014on july 17 , 2011 , the company entered into a definitive agreement with colombia movil s.a . e.s.p . ( 201ccolombia movil 201d ) , whereby atc sitios infraco , s.a.s. , a colombian subsidiary of the company ( 201catc infraco 201d ) , would purchase up to 2126 communications sites from colombia movil for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $ 182.0 million . from december 21 , 2011 through the year ended december 31 , 2012 , atc infraco completed the purchase of 1526 communications sites for an aggregate purchase price of $ 136.2 million ( including contingent consideration of $ 17.3 million ) , subject to post-closing adjustments . through a subsidiary , millicom international cellular s.a . ( 201cmillicom 201d ) exercised its option to acquire an indirect , substantial non-controlling interest in atc infraco . under the terms of the agreement , the company is required to make additional payments upon the conversion of certain barter agreements with other wireless carriers to cash paying lease agreements . based on the company 2019s current estimates , the value of potential contingent consideration payments required to be made under the amended agreement is expected to be between zero and $ 32.8 million and is estimated to be $ 17.3 million using a probability weighted average of the expected outcomes at december 31 , 2012 . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , the company recorded a reduction in fair value of $ 1.2 million , which is included in other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. .\nQuestion: on july 17, 2011, what was the aggregate purchase price of the communications sites acquired from colombia movil?\nAnswer: 182.0\nQuestion: and what was the number of those sites?\nAnswer: 2126.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the average purchase price per site?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.08561", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the allocation of the purchase price was finalized during the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the following table summarizes the allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : purchase price allocation . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>final purchase price allocation</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>non-current assets</td><td>$ 2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>property and equipment</td><td>3590</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>intangible assets ( 1 )</td><td>1062</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other non-current liabilities</td><td>-91 ( 91 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value of net assets acquired</td><td>$ 4563</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>goodwill ( 2 )</td><td>89</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 0.4 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 0.7 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . colombia 2014colombia movil acquisition 2014on july 17 , 2011 , the company entered into a definitive agreement with colombia movil s.a . e.s.p . ( 201ccolombia movil 201d ) , whereby atc sitios infraco , s.a.s. , a colombian subsidiary of the company ( 201catc infraco 201d ) , would purchase up to 2126 communications sites from colombia movil for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $ 182.0 million . from december 21 , 2011 through the year ended december 31 , 2012 , atc infraco completed the purchase of 1526 communications sites for an aggregate purchase price of $ 136.2 million ( including contingent consideration of $ 17.3 million ) , subject to post-closing adjustments . through a subsidiary , millicom international cellular s.a . ( 201cmillicom 201d ) exercised its option to acquire an indirect , substantial non-controlling interest in atc infraco . under the terms of the agreement , the company is required to make additional payments upon the conversion of certain barter agreements with other wireless carriers to cash paying lease agreements . based on the company 2019s current estimates , the value of potential contingent consideration payments required to be made under the amended agreement is expected to be between zero and $ 32.8 million and is estimated to be $ 17.3 million using a probability weighted average of the expected outcomes at december 31 , 2012 . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , the company recorded a reduction in fair value of $ 1.2 million , which is included in other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. .\nQuestion: on july 17, 2011, what was the aggregate purchase price of the communications sites acquired from colombia movil?\nAnswer: 182.0\nQuestion: and what was the number of those sites?\nAnswer: 2126.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the average purchase price per site?\nAnswer: 0.08561\nQuestion: and in the next year, concerning the total fair value of the net assets acquired, what percentage did the hard assets represent?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.78676", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: liquidity and capital resources during the past three years , we had sufficient financial resources to meet our operating requirements , to fund our capital spending , share repurchases and pension plans and to pay increasing dividends to our shareholders . cash from operating activities was $ 1436 million , $ 1310 million , and $ 1345 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . higher earnings increased cash from operations in 2011 compared to 2010 , but the increase was reduced by cash used to fund an increase in working capital of $ 212 million driven by our sales growth in 2011 . cash provided by working capital was greater in 2009 than 2010 and that decline was more than offset by the cash from higher 2010 earnings . operating working capital is a subset of total working capital and represents ( 1 ) trade receivables-net of the allowance for doubtful accounts , plus ( 2 ) inventories on a first-in , first-out ( 201cfifo 201d ) basis , less ( 3 ) trade creditors 2019 liabilities . see note 3 , 201cworking capital detail 201d under item 8 of this form 10-k for further information related to the components of the company 2019s operating working capital . we believe operating working capital represents the key components of working capital under the operating control of our businesses . operating working capital at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 2.7 billion and $ 2.6 billion , respectively . a key metric we use to measure our working capital management is operating working capital as a percentage of sales ( fourth quarter sales annualized ) . ( millions ) 2011 2010 operating working capital $ 2739 $ 2595 operating working capital as % ( % ) of sales 19.5% ( 19.5 % ) 19.2% ( 19.2 % ) the change in operating working capital elements , excluding the impact of currency and acquisitions , was an increase of $ 195 million during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . this increase was the net result of an increase in receivables from customers associated with the 2011 increase in sales and an increase in fifo inventory slightly offset by an increase in trade creditors 2019 liabilities . trade receivables from customers , net , as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 17.9 percent , down slightly from 18.1 percent for 2010 . days sales outstanding was 66 days in 2011 , level with 2010 . inventories on a fifo basis as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 13.1 percent level with 2010 . inventory turnover was 5.0 times in 2011 and 4.6 times in 2010 . total capital spending , including acquisitions , was $ 446 million , $ 341 million and $ 265 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . spending related to modernization and productivity improvements , expansion of existing businesses and environmental control projects was $ 390 million , $ 307 million and $ 239 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively , and is expected to be in the range of $ 450-$ 550 million during 2012 . capital spending , excluding acquisitions , as a percentage of sales was 2.6% ( 2.6 % ) , 2.3% ( 2.3 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . capital spending related to business acquisitions amounted to $ 56 million , $ 34 million , and $ 26 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . we continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and expect to use cash in 2012 to fund small to mid-sized acquisitions , as part of a balanced deployment of our cash to support growth in earnings . in january 2012 , the company closed the previously announced acquisitions of colpisa , a colombian producer of automotive oem and refinish coatings , and dyrup , a european architectural coatings company . the cost of these acquisitions , including assumed debt , was $ 193 million . dividends paid to shareholders totaled $ 355 million , $ 360 million and $ 353 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . ppg has paid uninterrupted annual dividends since 1899 , and 2011 marked the 40th consecutive year of increased annual dividend payments to shareholders . we did not have a mandatory contribution to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 ; however , we made voluntary contributions to these plans in 2011 totaling $ 50 million . in 2010 and 2009 , we made voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 250 and $ 360 million ( of which $ 100 million was made in ppg stock ) , respectively . we expect to make voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2012 of up to $ 60 million . contributions were made to our non-u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 71 million , $ 87 million and $ 90 million ( of which approximately $ 20 million was made in ppg stock ) for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , some of which were required by local funding requirements . we expect to make mandatory contributions to our non-u.s . plans in 2012 of approximately $ 90 million . the company 2019s share repurchase activity in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was 10.2 million shares at a cost of $ 858 million , 8.1 million shares at a cost of $ 586 million and 1.5 million shares at a cost of $ 59 million , respectively . we expect to make share repurchases in 2012 as part of our cash deployment focused on earnings growth . the amount of spending will depend on the level of acquisition spending and other uses of cash , but we currently expect to spend in the range of $ 250 million to $ 500 million on share repurchases in 2012 . we can repurchase about 9 million shares under the current authorization from the board of directors . 26 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating working capital</td><td>$ 2739</td><td>$ 2595</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating working capital as % ( % ) of sales</td><td>19.5% ( 19.5 % )</td><td>19.2</td><td>% ( % )</td></tr></table> liquidity and capital resources during the past three years , we had sufficient financial resources to meet our operating requirements , to fund our capital spending , share repurchases and pension plans and to pay increasing dividends to our shareholders . cash from operating activities was $ 1436 million , $ 1310 million , and $ 1345 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . higher earnings increased cash from operations in 2011 compared to 2010 , but the increase was reduced by cash used to fund an increase in working capital of $ 212 million driven by our sales growth in 2011 . cash provided by working capital was greater in 2009 than 2010 and that decline was more than offset by the cash from higher 2010 earnings . operating working capital is a subset of total working capital and represents ( 1 ) trade receivables-net of the allowance for doubtful accounts , plus ( 2 ) inventories on a first-in , first-out ( 201cfifo 201d ) basis , less ( 3 ) trade creditors 2019 liabilities . see note 3 , 201cworking capital detail 201d under item 8 of this form 10-k for further information related to the components of the company 2019s operating working capital . we believe operating working capital represents the key components of working capital under the operating control of our businesses . operating working capital at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 2.7 billion and $ 2.6 billion , respectively . a key metric we use to measure our working capital management is operating working capital as a percentage of sales ( fourth quarter sales annualized ) . ( millions ) 2011 2010 operating working capital $ 2739 $ 2595 operating working capital as % ( % ) of sales 19.5% ( 19.5 % ) 19.2% ( 19.2 % ) the change in operating working capital elements , excluding the impact of currency and acquisitions , was an increase of $ 195 million during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . this increase was the net result of an increase in receivables from customers associated with the 2011 increase in sales and an increase in fifo inventory slightly offset by an increase in trade creditors 2019 liabilities . trade receivables from customers , net , as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 17.9 percent , down slightly from 18.1 percent for 2010 . days sales outstanding was 66 days in 2011 , level with 2010 . inventories on a fifo basis as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 13.1 percent level with 2010 . inventory turnover was 5.0 times in 2011 and 4.6 times in 2010 . total capital spending , including acquisitions , was $ 446 million , $ 341 million and $ 265 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . spending related to modernization and productivity improvements , expansion of existing businesses and environmental control projects was $ 390 million , $ 307 million and $ 239 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively , and is expected to be in the range of $ 450-$ 550 million during 2012 . capital spending , excluding acquisitions , as a percentage of sales was 2.6% ( 2.6 % ) , 2.3% ( 2.3 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . capital spending related to business acquisitions amounted to $ 56 million , $ 34 million , and $ 26 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . we continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and expect to use cash in 2012 to fund small to mid-sized acquisitions , as part of a balanced deployment of our cash to support growth in earnings . in january 2012 , the company closed the previously announced acquisitions of colpisa , a colombian producer of automotive oem and refinish coatings , and dyrup , a european architectural coatings company . the cost of these acquisitions , including assumed debt , was $ 193 million . dividends paid to shareholders totaled $ 355 million , $ 360 million and $ 353 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . ppg has paid uninterrupted annual dividends since 1899 , and 2011 marked the 40th consecutive year of increased annual dividend payments to shareholders . we did not have a mandatory contribution to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 ; however , we made voluntary contributions to these plans in 2011 totaling $ 50 million . in 2010 and 2009 , we made voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 250 and $ 360 million ( of which $ 100 million was made in ppg stock ) , respectively . we expect to make voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2012 of up to $ 60 million . contributions were made to our non-u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 71 million , $ 87 million and $ 90 million ( of which approximately $ 20 million was made in ppg stock ) for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , some of which were required by local funding requirements . we expect to make mandatory contributions to our non-u.s . plans in 2012 of approximately $ 90 million . the company 2019s share repurchase activity in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was 10.2 million shares at a cost of $ 858 million , 8.1 million shares at a cost of $ 586 million and 1.5 million shares at a cost of $ 59 million , respectively . we expect to make share repurchases in 2012 as part of our cash deployment focused on earnings growth . the amount of spending will depend on the level of acquisition spending and other uses of cash , but we currently expect to spend in the range of $ 250 million to $ 500 million on share repurchases in 2012 . we can repurchase about 9 million shares under the current authorization from the board of directors . 26 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .\nQuestion: what was the cost, in millions, of the total share repurchase activity in the year of 2011?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "858.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: liquidity and capital resources during the past three years , we had sufficient financial resources to meet our operating requirements , to fund our capital spending , share repurchases and pension plans and to pay increasing dividends to our shareholders . cash from operating activities was $ 1436 million , $ 1310 million , and $ 1345 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . higher earnings increased cash from operations in 2011 compared to 2010 , but the increase was reduced by cash used to fund an increase in working capital of $ 212 million driven by our sales growth in 2011 . cash provided by working capital was greater in 2009 than 2010 and that decline was more than offset by the cash from higher 2010 earnings . operating working capital is a subset of total working capital and represents ( 1 ) trade receivables-net of the allowance for doubtful accounts , plus ( 2 ) inventories on a first-in , first-out ( 201cfifo 201d ) basis , less ( 3 ) trade creditors 2019 liabilities . see note 3 , 201cworking capital detail 201d under item 8 of this form 10-k for further information related to the components of the company 2019s operating working capital . we believe operating working capital represents the key components of working capital under the operating control of our businesses . operating working capital at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 2.7 billion and $ 2.6 billion , respectively . a key metric we use to measure our working capital management is operating working capital as a percentage of sales ( fourth quarter sales annualized ) . ( millions ) 2011 2010 operating working capital $ 2739 $ 2595 operating working capital as % ( % ) of sales 19.5% ( 19.5 % ) 19.2% ( 19.2 % ) the change in operating working capital elements , excluding the impact of currency and acquisitions , was an increase of $ 195 million during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . this increase was the net result of an increase in receivables from customers associated with the 2011 increase in sales and an increase in fifo inventory slightly offset by an increase in trade creditors 2019 liabilities . trade receivables from customers , net , as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 17.9 percent , down slightly from 18.1 percent for 2010 . days sales outstanding was 66 days in 2011 , level with 2010 . inventories on a fifo basis as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 13.1 percent level with 2010 . inventory turnover was 5.0 times in 2011 and 4.6 times in 2010 . total capital spending , including acquisitions , was $ 446 million , $ 341 million and $ 265 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . spending related to modernization and productivity improvements , expansion of existing businesses and environmental control projects was $ 390 million , $ 307 million and $ 239 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively , and is expected to be in the range of $ 450-$ 550 million during 2012 . capital spending , excluding acquisitions , as a percentage of sales was 2.6% ( 2.6 % ) , 2.3% ( 2.3 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . capital spending related to business acquisitions amounted to $ 56 million , $ 34 million , and $ 26 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . we continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and expect to use cash in 2012 to fund small to mid-sized acquisitions , as part of a balanced deployment of our cash to support growth in earnings . in january 2012 , the company closed the previously announced acquisitions of colpisa , a colombian producer of automotive oem and refinish coatings , and dyrup , a european architectural coatings company . the cost of these acquisitions , including assumed debt , was $ 193 million . dividends paid to shareholders totaled $ 355 million , $ 360 million and $ 353 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . ppg has paid uninterrupted annual dividends since 1899 , and 2011 marked the 40th consecutive year of increased annual dividend payments to shareholders . we did not have a mandatory contribution to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 ; however , we made voluntary contributions to these plans in 2011 totaling $ 50 million . in 2010 and 2009 , we made voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 250 and $ 360 million ( of which $ 100 million was made in ppg stock ) , respectively . we expect to make voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2012 of up to $ 60 million . contributions were made to our non-u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 71 million , $ 87 million and $ 90 million ( of which approximately $ 20 million was made in ppg stock ) for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , some of which were required by local funding requirements . we expect to make mandatory contributions to our non-u.s . plans in 2012 of approximately $ 90 million . the company 2019s share repurchase activity in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was 10.2 million shares at a cost of $ 858 million , 8.1 million shares at a cost of $ 586 million and 1.5 million shares at a cost of $ 59 million , respectively . we expect to make share repurchases in 2012 as part of our cash deployment focused on earnings growth . the amount of spending will depend on the level of acquisition spending and other uses of cash , but we currently expect to spend in the range of $ 250 million to $ 500 million on share repurchases in 2012 . we can repurchase about 9 million shares under the current authorization from the board of directors . 26 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating working capital</td><td>$ 2739</td><td>$ 2595</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating working capital as % ( % ) of sales</td><td>19.5% ( 19.5 % )</td><td>19.2</td><td>% ( % )</td></tr></table> liquidity and capital resources during the past three years , we had sufficient financial resources to meet our operating requirements , to fund our capital spending , share repurchases and pension plans and to pay increasing dividends to our shareholders . cash from operating activities was $ 1436 million , $ 1310 million , and $ 1345 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . higher earnings increased cash from operations in 2011 compared to 2010 , but the increase was reduced by cash used to fund an increase in working capital of $ 212 million driven by our sales growth in 2011 . cash provided by working capital was greater in 2009 than 2010 and that decline was more than offset by the cash from higher 2010 earnings . operating working capital is a subset of total working capital and represents ( 1 ) trade receivables-net of the allowance for doubtful accounts , plus ( 2 ) inventories on a first-in , first-out ( 201cfifo 201d ) basis , less ( 3 ) trade creditors 2019 liabilities . see note 3 , 201cworking capital detail 201d under item 8 of this form 10-k for further information related to the components of the company 2019s operating working capital . we believe operating working capital represents the key components of working capital under the operating control of our businesses . operating working capital at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 2.7 billion and $ 2.6 billion , respectively . a key metric we use to measure our working capital management is operating working capital as a percentage of sales ( fourth quarter sales annualized ) . ( millions ) 2011 2010 operating working capital $ 2739 $ 2595 operating working capital as % ( % ) of sales 19.5% ( 19.5 % ) 19.2% ( 19.2 % ) the change in operating working capital elements , excluding the impact of currency and acquisitions , was an increase of $ 195 million during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . this increase was the net result of an increase in receivables from customers associated with the 2011 increase in sales and an increase in fifo inventory slightly offset by an increase in trade creditors 2019 liabilities . trade receivables from customers , net , as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 17.9 percent , down slightly from 18.1 percent for 2010 . days sales outstanding was 66 days in 2011 , level with 2010 . inventories on a fifo basis as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 13.1 percent level with 2010 . inventory turnover was 5.0 times in 2011 and 4.6 times in 2010 . total capital spending , including acquisitions , was $ 446 million , $ 341 million and $ 265 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . spending related to modernization and productivity improvements , expansion of existing businesses and environmental control projects was $ 390 million , $ 307 million and $ 239 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively , and is expected to be in the range of $ 450-$ 550 million during 2012 . capital spending , excluding acquisitions , as a percentage of sales was 2.6% ( 2.6 % ) , 2.3% ( 2.3 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . capital spending related to business acquisitions amounted to $ 56 million , $ 34 million , and $ 26 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . we continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and expect to use cash in 2012 to fund small to mid-sized acquisitions , as part of a balanced deployment of our cash to support growth in earnings . in january 2012 , the company closed the previously announced acquisitions of colpisa , a colombian producer of automotive oem and refinish coatings , and dyrup , a european architectural coatings company . the cost of these acquisitions , including assumed debt , was $ 193 million . dividends paid to shareholders totaled $ 355 million , $ 360 million and $ 353 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . ppg has paid uninterrupted annual dividends since 1899 , and 2011 marked the 40th consecutive year of increased annual dividend payments to shareholders . we did not have a mandatory contribution to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 ; however , we made voluntary contributions to these plans in 2011 totaling $ 50 million . in 2010 and 2009 , we made voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 250 and $ 360 million ( of which $ 100 million was made in ppg stock ) , respectively . we expect to make voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2012 of up to $ 60 million . contributions were made to our non-u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 71 million , $ 87 million and $ 90 million ( of which approximately $ 20 million was made in ppg stock ) for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , some of which were required by local funding requirements . we expect to make mandatory contributions to our non-u.s . plans in 2012 of approximately $ 90 million . the company 2019s share repurchase activity in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was 10.2 million shares at a cost of $ 858 million , 8.1 million shares at a cost of $ 586 million and 1.5 million shares at a cost of $ 59 million , respectively . we expect to make share repurchases in 2012 as part of our cash deployment focused on earnings growth . the amount of spending will depend on the level of acquisition spending and other uses of cash , but we currently expect to spend in the range of $ 250 million to $ 500 million on share repurchases in 2012 . we can repurchase about 9 million shares under the current authorization from the board of directors . 26 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .\nQuestion: what was the cost, in millions, of the total share repurchase activity in the year of 2011?\nAnswer: 858.0\nQuestion: and how many shares were repurchased in that process, in millions?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "10.2", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: liquidity and capital resources during the past three years , we had sufficient financial resources to meet our operating requirements , to fund our capital spending , share repurchases and pension plans and to pay increasing dividends to our shareholders . cash from operating activities was $ 1436 million , $ 1310 million , and $ 1345 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . higher earnings increased cash from operations in 2011 compared to 2010 , but the increase was reduced by cash used to fund an increase in working capital of $ 212 million driven by our sales growth in 2011 . cash provided by working capital was greater in 2009 than 2010 and that decline was more than offset by the cash from higher 2010 earnings . operating working capital is a subset of total working capital and represents ( 1 ) trade receivables-net of the allowance for doubtful accounts , plus ( 2 ) inventories on a first-in , first-out ( 201cfifo 201d ) basis , less ( 3 ) trade creditors 2019 liabilities . see note 3 , 201cworking capital detail 201d under item 8 of this form 10-k for further information related to the components of the company 2019s operating working capital . we believe operating working capital represents the key components of working capital under the operating control of our businesses . operating working capital at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 2.7 billion and $ 2.6 billion , respectively . a key metric we use to measure our working capital management is operating working capital as a percentage of sales ( fourth quarter sales annualized ) . ( millions ) 2011 2010 operating working capital $ 2739 $ 2595 operating working capital as % ( % ) of sales 19.5% ( 19.5 % ) 19.2% ( 19.2 % ) the change in operating working capital elements , excluding the impact of currency and acquisitions , was an increase of $ 195 million during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . this increase was the net result of an increase in receivables from customers associated with the 2011 increase in sales and an increase in fifo inventory slightly offset by an increase in trade creditors 2019 liabilities . trade receivables from customers , net , as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 17.9 percent , down slightly from 18.1 percent for 2010 . days sales outstanding was 66 days in 2011 , level with 2010 . inventories on a fifo basis as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 13.1 percent level with 2010 . inventory turnover was 5.0 times in 2011 and 4.6 times in 2010 . total capital spending , including acquisitions , was $ 446 million , $ 341 million and $ 265 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . spending related to modernization and productivity improvements , expansion of existing businesses and environmental control projects was $ 390 million , $ 307 million and $ 239 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively , and is expected to be in the range of $ 450-$ 550 million during 2012 . capital spending , excluding acquisitions , as a percentage of sales was 2.6% ( 2.6 % ) , 2.3% ( 2.3 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . capital spending related to business acquisitions amounted to $ 56 million , $ 34 million , and $ 26 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . we continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and expect to use cash in 2012 to fund small to mid-sized acquisitions , as part of a balanced deployment of our cash to support growth in earnings . in january 2012 , the company closed the previously announced acquisitions of colpisa , a colombian producer of automotive oem and refinish coatings , and dyrup , a european architectural coatings company . the cost of these acquisitions , including assumed debt , was $ 193 million . dividends paid to shareholders totaled $ 355 million , $ 360 million and $ 353 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . ppg has paid uninterrupted annual dividends since 1899 , and 2011 marked the 40th consecutive year of increased annual dividend payments to shareholders . we did not have a mandatory contribution to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 ; however , we made voluntary contributions to these plans in 2011 totaling $ 50 million . in 2010 and 2009 , we made voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 250 and $ 360 million ( of which $ 100 million was made in ppg stock ) , respectively . we expect to make voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2012 of up to $ 60 million . contributions were made to our non-u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 71 million , $ 87 million and $ 90 million ( of which approximately $ 20 million was made in ppg stock ) for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , some of which were required by local funding requirements . we expect to make mandatory contributions to our non-u.s . plans in 2012 of approximately $ 90 million . the company 2019s share repurchase activity in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was 10.2 million shares at a cost of $ 858 million , 8.1 million shares at a cost of $ 586 million and 1.5 million shares at a cost of $ 59 million , respectively . we expect to make share repurchases in 2012 as part of our cash deployment focused on earnings growth . the amount of spending will depend on the level of acquisition spending and other uses of cash , but we currently expect to spend in the range of $ 250 million to $ 500 million on share repurchases in 2012 . we can repurchase about 9 million shares under the current authorization from the board of directors . 26 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating working capital</td><td>$ 2739</td><td>$ 2595</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating working capital as % ( % ) of sales</td><td>19.5% ( 19.5 % )</td><td>19.2</td><td>% ( % )</td></tr></table> liquidity and capital resources during the past three years , we had sufficient financial resources to meet our operating requirements , to fund our capital spending , share repurchases and pension plans and to pay increasing dividends to our shareholders . cash from operating activities was $ 1436 million , $ 1310 million , and $ 1345 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . higher earnings increased cash from operations in 2011 compared to 2010 , but the increase was reduced by cash used to fund an increase in working capital of $ 212 million driven by our sales growth in 2011 . cash provided by working capital was greater in 2009 than 2010 and that decline was more than offset by the cash from higher 2010 earnings . operating working capital is a subset of total working capital and represents ( 1 ) trade receivables-net of the allowance for doubtful accounts , plus ( 2 ) inventories on a first-in , first-out ( 201cfifo 201d ) basis , less ( 3 ) trade creditors 2019 liabilities . see note 3 , 201cworking capital detail 201d under item 8 of this form 10-k for further information related to the components of the company 2019s operating working capital . we believe operating working capital represents the key components of working capital under the operating control of our businesses . operating working capital at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 2.7 billion and $ 2.6 billion , respectively . a key metric we use to measure our working capital management is operating working capital as a percentage of sales ( fourth quarter sales annualized ) . ( millions ) 2011 2010 operating working capital $ 2739 $ 2595 operating working capital as % ( % ) of sales 19.5% ( 19.5 % ) 19.2% ( 19.2 % ) the change in operating working capital elements , excluding the impact of currency and acquisitions , was an increase of $ 195 million during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . this increase was the net result of an increase in receivables from customers associated with the 2011 increase in sales and an increase in fifo inventory slightly offset by an increase in trade creditors 2019 liabilities . trade receivables from customers , net , as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 17.9 percent , down slightly from 18.1 percent for 2010 . days sales outstanding was 66 days in 2011 , level with 2010 . inventories on a fifo basis as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 13.1 percent level with 2010 . inventory turnover was 5.0 times in 2011 and 4.6 times in 2010 . total capital spending , including acquisitions , was $ 446 million , $ 341 million and $ 265 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . spending related to modernization and productivity improvements , expansion of existing businesses and environmental control projects was $ 390 million , $ 307 million and $ 239 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively , and is expected to be in the range of $ 450-$ 550 million during 2012 . capital spending , excluding acquisitions , as a percentage of sales was 2.6% ( 2.6 % ) , 2.3% ( 2.3 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . capital spending related to business acquisitions amounted to $ 56 million , $ 34 million , and $ 26 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . we continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and expect to use cash in 2012 to fund small to mid-sized acquisitions , as part of a balanced deployment of our cash to support growth in earnings . in january 2012 , the company closed the previously announced acquisitions of colpisa , a colombian producer of automotive oem and refinish coatings , and dyrup , a european architectural coatings company . the cost of these acquisitions , including assumed debt , was $ 193 million . dividends paid to shareholders totaled $ 355 million , $ 360 million and $ 353 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . ppg has paid uninterrupted annual dividends since 1899 , and 2011 marked the 40th consecutive year of increased annual dividend payments to shareholders . we did not have a mandatory contribution to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 ; however , we made voluntary contributions to these plans in 2011 totaling $ 50 million . in 2010 and 2009 , we made voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 250 and $ 360 million ( of which $ 100 million was made in ppg stock ) , respectively . we expect to make voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2012 of up to $ 60 million . contributions were made to our non-u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 71 million , $ 87 million and $ 90 million ( of which approximately $ 20 million was made in ppg stock ) for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , some of which were required by local funding requirements . we expect to make mandatory contributions to our non-u.s . plans in 2012 of approximately $ 90 million . the company 2019s share repurchase activity in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was 10.2 million shares at a cost of $ 858 million , 8.1 million shares at a cost of $ 586 million and 1.5 million shares at a cost of $ 59 million , respectively . we expect to make share repurchases in 2012 as part of our cash deployment focused on earnings growth . the amount of spending will depend on the level of acquisition spending and other uses of cash , but we currently expect to spend in the range of $ 250 million to $ 500 million on share repurchases in 2012 . we can repurchase about 9 million shares under the current authorization from the board of directors . 26 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .\nQuestion: what was the cost, in millions, of the total share repurchase activity in the year of 2011?\nAnswer: 858.0\nQuestion: and how many shares were repurchased in that process, in millions?\nAnswer: 10.2\nQuestion: what was, then, the cost of each share repurchased?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "84.11765", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: liquidity and capital resources during the past three years , we had sufficient financial resources to meet our operating requirements , to fund our capital spending , share repurchases and pension plans and to pay increasing dividends to our shareholders . cash from operating activities was $ 1436 million , $ 1310 million , and $ 1345 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . higher earnings increased cash from operations in 2011 compared to 2010 , but the increase was reduced by cash used to fund an increase in working capital of $ 212 million driven by our sales growth in 2011 . cash provided by working capital was greater in 2009 than 2010 and that decline was more than offset by the cash from higher 2010 earnings . operating working capital is a subset of total working capital and represents ( 1 ) trade receivables-net of the allowance for doubtful accounts , plus ( 2 ) inventories on a first-in , first-out ( 201cfifo 201d ) basis , less ( 3 ) trade creditors 2019 liabilities . see note 3 , 201cworking capital detail 201d under item 8 of this form 10-k for further information related to the components of the company 2019s operating working capital . we believe operating working capital represents the key components of working capital under the operating control of our businesses . operating working capital at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 2.7 billion and $ 2.6 billion , respectively . a key metric we use to measure our working capital management is operating working capital as a percentage of sales ( fourth quarter sales annualized ) . ( millions ) 2011 2010 operating working capital $ 2739 $ 2595 operating working capital as % ( % ) of sales 19.5% ( 19.5 % ) 19.2% ( 19.2 % ) the change in operating working capital elements , excluding the impact of currency and acquisitions , was an increase of $ 195 million during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . this increase was the net result of an increase in receivables from customers associated with the 2011 increase in sales and an increase in fifo inventory slightly offset by an increase in trade creditors 2019 liabilities . trade receivables from customers , net , as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 17.9 percent , down slightly from 18.1 percent for 2010 . days sales outstanding was 66 days in 2011 , level with 2010 . inventories on a fifo basis as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 13.1 percent level with 2010 . inventory turnover was 5.0 times in 2011 and 4.6 times in 2010 . total capital spending , including acquisitions , was $ 446 million , $ 341 million and $ 265 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . spending related to modernization and productivity improvements , expansion of existing businesses and environmental control projects was $ 390 million , $ 307 million and $ 239 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively , and is expected to be in the range of $ 450-$ 550 million during 2012 . capital spending , excluding acquisitions , as a percentage of sales was 2.6% ( 2.6 % ) , 2.3% ( 2.3 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . capital spending related to business acquisitions amounted to $ 56 million , $ 34 million , and $ 26 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . we continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and expect to use cash in 2012 to fund small to mid-sized acquisitions , as part of a balanced deployment of our cash to support growth in earnings . in january 2012 , the company closed the previously announced acquisitions of colpisa , a colombian producer of automotive oem and refinish coatings , and dyrup , a european architectural coatings company . the cost of these acquisitions , including assumed debt , was $ 193 million . dividends paid to shareholders totaled $ 355 million , $ 360 million and $ 353 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . ppg has paid uninterrupted annual dividends since 1899 , and 2011 marked the 40th consecutive year of increased annual dividend payments to shareholders . we did not have a mandatory contribution to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 ; however , we made voluntary contributions to these plans in 2011 totaling $ 50 million . in 2010 and 2009 , we made voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 250 and $ 360 million ( of which $ 100 million was made in ppg stock ) , respectively . we expect to make voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2012 of up to $ 60 million . contributions were made to our non-u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 71 million , $ 87 million and $ 90 million ( of which approximately $ 20 million was made in ppg stock ) for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , some of which were required by local funding requirements . we expect to make mandatory contributions to our non-u.s . plans in 2012 of approximately $ 90 million . the company 2019s share repurchase activity in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was 10.2 million shares at a cost of $ 858 million , 8.1 million shares at a cost of $ 586 million and 1.5 million shares at a cost of $ 59 million , respectively . we expect to make share repurchases in 2012 as part of our cash deployment focused on earnings growth . the amount of spending will depend on the level of acquisition spending and other uses of cash , but we currently expect to spend in the range of $ 250 million to $ 500 million on share repurchases in 2012 . we can repurchase about 9 million shares under the current authorization from the board of directors . 26 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating working capital</td><td>$ 2739</td><td>$ 2595</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating working capital as % ( % ) of sales</td><td>19.5% ( 19.5 % )</td><td>19.2</td><td>% ( % )</td></tr></table> liquidity and capital resources during the past three years , we had sufficient financial resources to meet our operating requirements , to fund our capital spending , share repurchases and pension plans and to pay increasing dividends to our shareholders . cash from operating activities was $ 1436 million , $ 1310 million , and $ 1345 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . higher earnings increased cash from operations in 2011 compared to 2010 , but the increase was reduced by cash used to fund an increase in working capital of $ 212 million driven by our sales growth in 2011 . cash provided by working capital was greater in 2009 than 2010 and that decline was more than offset by the cash from higher 2010 earnings . operating working capital is a subset of total working capital and represents ( 1 ) trade receivables-net of the allowance for doubtful accounts , plus ( 2 ) inventories on a first-in , first-out ( 201cfifo 201d ) basis , less ( 3 ) trade creditors 2019 liabilities . see note 3 , 201cworking capital detail 201d under item 8 of this form 10-k for further information related to the components of the company 2019s operating working capital . we believe operating working capital represents the key components of working capital under the operating control of our businesses . operating working capital at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 2.7 billion and $ 2.6 billion , respectively . a key metric we use to measure our working capital management is operating working capital as a percentage of sales ( fourth quarter sales annualized ) . ( millions ) 2011 2010 operating working capital $ 2739 $ 2595 operating working capital as % ( % ) of sales 19.5% ( 19.5 % ) 19.2% ( 19.2 % ) the change in operating working capital elements , excluding the impact of currency and acquisitions , was an increase of $ 195 million during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . this increase was the net result of an increase in receivables from customers associated with the 2011 increase in sales and an increase in fifo inventory slightly offset by an increase in trade creditors 2019 liabilities . trade receivables from customers , net , as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 17.9 percent , down slightly from 18.1 percent for 2010 . days sales outstanding was 66 days in 2011 , level with 2010 . inventories on a fifo basis as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 13.1 percent level with 2010 . inventory turnover was 5.0 times in 2011 and 4.6 times in 2010 . total capital spending , including acquisitions , was $ 446 million , $ 341 million and $ 265 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . spending related to modernization and productivity improvements , expansion of existing businesses and environmental control projects was $ 390 million , $ 307 million and $ 239 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively , and is expected to be in the range of $ 450-$ 550 million during 2012 . capital spending , excluding acquisitions , as a percentage of sales was 2.6% ( 2.6 % ) , 2.3% ( 2.3 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . capital spending related to business acquisitions amounted to $ 56 million , $ 34 million , and $ 26 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . we continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and expect to use cash in 2012 to fund small to mid-sized acquisitions , as part of a balanced deployment of our cash to support growth in earnings . in january 2012 , the company closed the previously announced acquisitions of colpisa , a colombian producer of automotive oem and refinish coatings , and dyrup , a european architectural coatings company . the cost of these acquisitions , including assumed debt , was $ 193 million . dividends paid to shareholders totaled $ 355 million , $ 360 million and $ 353 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . ppg has paid uninterrupted annual dividends since 1899 , and 2011 marked the 40th consecutive year of increased annual dividend payments to shareholders . we did not have a mandatory contribution to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 ; however , we made voluntary contributions to these plans in 2011 totaling $ 50 million . in 2010 and 2009 , we made voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 250 and $ 360 million ( of which $ 100 million was made in ppg stock ) , respectively . we expect to make voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2012 of up to $ 60 million . contributions were made to our non-u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 71 million , $ 87 million and $ 90 million ( of which approximately $ 20 million was made in ppg stock ) for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , some of which were required by local funding requirements . we expect to make mandatory contributions to our non-u.s . plans in 2012 of approximately $ 90 million . the company 2019s share repurchase activity in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was 10.2 million shares at a cost of $ 858 million , 8.1 million shares at a cost of $ 586 million and 1.5 million shares at a cost of $ 59 million , respectively . we expect to make share repurchases in 2012 as part of our cash deployment focused on earnings growth . the amount of spending will depend on the level of acquisition spending and other uses of cash , but we currently expect to spend in the range of $ 250 million to $ 500 million on share repurchases in 2012 . we can repurchase about 9 million shares under the current authorization from the board of directors . 26 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .\nQuestion: what was the cost, in millions, of the total share repurchase activity in the year of 2011?\nAnswer: 858.0\nQuestion: and how many shares were repurchased in that process, in millions?\nAnswer: 10.2\nQuestion: what was, then, the cost of each share repurchased?\nAnswer: 84.11765\nQuestion: considering that same cost per share, what would be the total cost, in millions, to repurchase the remaining 9 million shares?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "757.05882", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: liquidity and capital resources during the past three years , we had sufficient financial resources to meet our operating requirements , to fund our capital spending , share repurchases and pension plans and to pay increasing dividends to our shareholders . cash from operating activities was $ 1436 million , $ 1310 million , and $ 1345 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . higher earnings increased cash from operations in 2011 compared to 2010 , but the increase was reduced by cash used to fund an increase in working capital of $ 212 million driven by our sales growth in 2011 . cash provided by working capital was greater in 2009 than 2010 and that decline was more than offset by the cash from higher 2010 earnings . operating working capital is a subset of total working capital and represents ( 1 ) trade receivables-net of the allowance for doubtful accounts , plus ( 2 ) inventories on a first-in , first-out ( 201cfifo 201d ) basis , less ( 3 ) trade creditors 2019 liabilities . see note 3 , 201cworking capital detail 201d under item 8 of this form 10-k for further information related to the components of the company 2019s operating working capital . we believe operating working capital represents the key components of working capital under the operating control of our businesses . operating working capital at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 2.7 billion and $ 2.6 billion , respectively . a key metric we use to measure our working capital management is operating working capital as a percentage of sales ( fourth quarter sales annualized ) . ( millions ) 2011 2010 operating working capital $ 2739 $ 2595 operating working capital as % ( % ) of sales 19.5% ( 19.5 % ) 19.2% ( 19.2 % ) the change in operating working capital elements , excluding the impact of currency and acquisitions , was an increase of $ 195 million during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . this increase was the net result of an increase in receivables from customers associated with the 2011 increase in sales and an increase in fifo inventory slightly offset by an increase in trade creditors 2019 liabilities . trade receivables from customers , net , as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 17.9 percent , down slightly from 18.1 percent for 2010 . days sales outstanding was 66 days in 2011 , level with 2010 . inventories on a fifo basis as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 13.1 percent level with 2010 . inventory turnover was 5.0 times in 2011 and 4.6 times in 2010 . total capital spending , including acquisitions , was $ 446 million , $ 341 million and $ 265 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . spending related to modernization and productivity improvements , expansion of existing businesses and environmental control projects was $ 390 million , $ 307 million and $ 239 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively , and is expected to be in the range of $ 450-$ 550 million during 2012 . capital spending , excluding acquisitions , as a percentage of sales was 2.6% ( 2.6 % ) , 2.3% ( 2.3 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . capital spending related to business acquisitions amounted to $ 56 million , $ 34 million , and $ 26 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . we continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and expect to use cash in 2012 to fund small to mid-sized acquisitions , as part of a balanced deployment of our cash to support growth in earnings . in january 2012 , the company closed the previously announced acquisitions of colpisa , a colombian producer of automotive oem and refinish coatings , and dyrup , a european architectural coatings company . the cost of these acquisitions , including assumed debt , was $ 193 million . dividends paid to shareholders totaled $ 355 million , $ 360 million and $ 353 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . ppg has paid uninterrupted annual dividends since 1899 , and 2011 marked the 40th consecutive year of increased annual dividend payments to shareholders . we did not have a mandatory contribution to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 ; however , we made voluntary contributions to these plans in 2011 totaling $ 50 million . in 2010 and 2009 , we made voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 250 and $ 360 million ( of which $ 100 million was made in ppg stock ) , respectively . we expect to make voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2012 of up to $ 60 million . contributions were made to our non-u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 71 million , $ 87 million and $ 90 million ( of which approximately $ 20 million was made in ppg stock ) for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , some of which were required by local funding requirements . we expect to make mandatory contributions to our non-u.s . plans in 2012 of approximately $ 90 million . the company 2019s share repurchase activity in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was 10.2 million shares at a cost of $ 858 million , 8.1 million shares at a cost of $ 586 million and 1.5 million shares at a cost of $ 59 million , respectively . we expect to make share repurchases in 2012 as part of our cash deployment focused on earnings growth . the amount of spending will depend on the level of acquisition spending and other uses of cash , but we currently expect to spend in the range of $ 250 million to $ 500 million on share repurchases in 2012 . we can repurchase about 9 million shares under the current authorization from the board of directors . 26 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>operating working capital</td><td>$ 2739</td><td>$ 2595</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating working capital as % ( % ) of sales</td><td>19.5% ( 19.5 % )</td><td>19.2</td><td>% ( % )</td></tr></table> liquidity and capital resources during the past three years , we had sufficient financial resources to meet our operating requirements , to fund our capital spending , share repurchases and pension plans and to pay increasing dividends to our shareholders . cash from operating activities was $ 1436 million , $ 1310 million , and $ 1345 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . higher earnings increased cash from operations in 2011 compared to 2010 , but the increase was reduced by cash used to fund an increase in working capital of $ 212 million driven by our sales growth in 2011 . cash provided by working capital was greater in 2009 than 2010 and that decline was more than offset by the cash from higher 2010 earnings . operating working capital is a subset of total working capital and represents ( 1 ) trade receivables-net of the allowance for doubtful accounts , plus ( 2 ) inventories on a first-in , first-out ( 201cfifo 201d ) basis , less ( 3 ) trade creditors 2019 liabilities . see note 3 , 201cworking capital detail 201d under item 8 of this form 10-k for further information related to the components of the company 2019s operating working capital . we believe operating working capital represents the key components of working capital under the operating control of our businesses . operating working capital at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 was $ 2.7 billion and $ 2.6 billion , respectively . a key metric we use to measure our working capital management is operating working capital as a percentage of sales ( fourth quarter sales annualized ) . ( millions ) 2011 2010 operating working capital $ 2739 $ 2595 operating working capital as % ( % ) of sales 19.5% ( 19.5 % ) 19.2% ( 19.2 % ) the change in operating working capital elements , excluding the impact of currency and acquisitions , was an increase of $ 195 million during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . this increase was the net result of an increase in receivables from customers associated with the 2011 increase in sales and an increase in fifo inventory slightly offset by an increase in trade creditors 2019 liabilities . trade receivables from customers , net , as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 17.9 percent , down slightly from 18.1 percent for 2010 . days sales outstanding was 66 days in 2011 , level with 2010 . inventories on a fifo basis as a percentage of fourth quarter sales , annualized , for 2011 was 13.1 percent level with 2010 . inventory turnover was 5.0 times in 2011 and 4.6 times in 2010 . total capital spending , including acquisitions , was $ 446 million , $ 341 million and $ 265 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . spending related to modernization and productivity improvements , expansion of existing businesses and environmental control projects was $ 390 million , $ 307 million and $ 239 million in 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively , and is expected to be in the range of $ 450-$ 550 million during 2012 . capital spending , excluding acquisitions , as a percentage of sales was 2.6% ( 2.6 % ) , 2.3% ( 2.3 % ) and 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . capital spending related to business acquisitions amounted to $ 56 million , $ 34 million , and $ 26 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . we continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and expect to use cash in 2012 to fund small to mid-sized acquisitions , as part of a balanced deployment of our cash to support growth in earnings . in january 2012 , the company closed the previously announced acquisitions of colpisa , a colombian producer of automotive oem and refinish coatings , and dyrup , a european architectural coatings company . the cost of these acquisitions , including assumed debt , was $ 193 million . dividends paid to shareholders totaled $ 355 million , $ 360 million and $ 353 million in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . ppg has paid uninterrupted annual dividends since 1899 , and 2011 marked the 40th consecutive year of increased annual dividend payments to shareholders . we did not have a mandatory contribution to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 ; however , we made voluntary contributions to these plans in 2011 totaling $ 50 million . in 2010 and 2009 , we made voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 250 and $ 360 million ( of which $ 100 million was made in ppg stock ) , respectively . we expect to make voluntary contributions to our u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2012 of up to $ 60 million . contributions were made to our non-u.s . defined benefit pension plans of $ 71 million , $ 87 million and $ 90 million ( of which approximately $ 20 million was made in ppg stock ) for 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively , some of which were required by local funding requirements . we expect to make mandatory contributions to our non-u.s . plans in 2012 of approximately $ 90 million . the company 2019s share repurchase activity in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 was 10.2 million shares at a cost of $ 858 million , 8.1 million shares at a cost of $ 586 million and 1.5 million shares at a cost of $ 59 million , respectively . we expect to make share repurchases in 2012 as part of our cash deployment focused on earnings growth . the amount of spending will depend on the level of acquisition spending and other uses of cash , but we currently expect to spend in the range of $ 250 million to $ 500 million on share repurchases in 2012 . we can repurchase about 9 million shares under the current authorization from the board of directors . 26 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .\nQuestion: what was the cost, in millions, of the total share repurchase activity in the year of 2011?\nAnswer: 858.0\nQuestion: and how many shares were repurchased in that process, in millions?\nAnswer: 10.2\nQuestion: what was, then, the cost of each share repurchased?\nAnswer: 84.11765\nQuestion: considering that same cost per share, what would be the total cost, in millions, to repurchase the remaining 9 million shares?\nAnswer: 757.05882\nQuestion: and what would be that cost if not in millions?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "757058823.52941", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: table of contents capital deployment program will be subject to market and economic conditions , applicable legal requirements and other relevant factors . our capital deployment program does not obligate us to continue a dividend for any fixed period , and payment of dividends may be suspended at any time at our discretion . stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total stockholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2015 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/9/2013</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>american airlines group inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 219</td><td>$ 175</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amex airline index</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>152</td><td>127</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>114</td><td>113</td></tr></table> purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers since july 2014 , our board of directors has approved several share repurchase programs aggregating $ 7.0 billion of authority of which , as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 2.4 billion remained unused under repurchase programs .\nQuestion: what was the change in the value of the american airlines group inc ., considering its value in 2015 and the original amount invested in it in september 2013?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "75.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: table of contents capital deployment program will be subject to market and economic conditions , applicable legal requirements and other relevant factors . our capital deployment program does not obligate us to continue a dividend for any fixed period , and payment of dividends may be suspended at any time at our discretion . stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total stockholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2015 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/9/2013</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>american airlines group inc .</td><td>$ 100</td><td>$ 103</td><td>$ 219</td><td>$ 175</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amex airline index</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>152</td><td>127</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100</td><td>102</td><td>114</td><td>113</td></tr></table> purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers since july 2014 , our board of directors has approved several share repurchase programs aggregating $ 7.0 billion of authority of which , as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 2.4 billion remained unused under repurchase programs .\nQuestion: what was the change in the value of the american airlines group inc ., considering its value in 2015 and the original amount invested in it in september 2013?\nAnswer: 75.0\nQuestion: and how much does this change represent in relation to this original amount invested?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.75", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , options for 5 million and 6 million shares of common stock were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 55.42 and $ 56.21 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised was approximately $ .1 billion during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately $ .1 billion , $ .1 billion and $ .2 billion , respectively . the tax benefit realized from option exercises under all incentive plans was insignificant for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were approximately 39 million shares at december 31 , 2016 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under all equity compensation plans totaled approximately 40 million shares at december 31 , 2016 . during 2016 , we issued approximately 2 million common shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . incentive/performance unit awards and restricted share/restricted share unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit awards and restricted share/restricted share unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock on the date of grant with a reduction for estimated forfeitures . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals . additionally , certain incentive/ performance unit awards require subsequent adjustment to their current market value due to certain discretionary risk review triggers . the weighted-average grant date fair value of incentive/ performance unit awards and restricted share/restricted share unit awards granted in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 78.37 , $ 91.57 and $ 80.79 per share , respectively . the total intrinsic value of incentive/performance unit and restricted share/ restricted share unit awards vested during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately $ .1 billion , $ .2 billion and $ .1 billion , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . table 78 : nonvested incentive/performance unit awards and restricted share/restricted share unit awards 2013 rollforward ( a ) shares in millions nonvested incentive/ performance units shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted share/ restricted weighted- average grant date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>shares in millions december 31 2015</td><td>nonvested incentive/ performance units shares 2</td><td>weighted- average grant date fair value $ 79.27</td><td>nonvested restricted share/ restricted share units 3</td><td>weighted- average grant date fair value $ 79.26</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>granted ( b )</td><td>1</td><td>$ 77.77</td><td>1</td><td>$ 78.71</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vested/released ( b )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>$ 71.59</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>$ 65.53</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2016</td><td>2</td><td>$ 81.42</td><td>3</td><td>$ 83.27</td></tr></table> ( a ) forfeited awards during 2016 were insignificant . ( b ) includes adjustments for achieving specific performance goals for incentive/ performance unit share awards granted in prior periods . in table 78 , the units and related weighted-average grant date fair value of the incentive/performance unit share awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash if and when the underlying shares are issued to the participants . blackrock long-term incentive plans ( ltip ) blackrock adopted the 2002 ltip program to help attract and retain qualified professionals . at that time , we agreed to transfer up to four million shares of blackrock common stock to fund a portion of the 2002 ltip program and future ltip programs approved by blackrock 2019s board of directors . in 2009 , our obligation to deliver any remaining blackrock common shares was replaced with an obligation to deliver shares of blackrock 2019s series c preferred stock held by us . in 2016 , we transferred .5 million shares of blackrock series c preferred stock to blackrock in connection with our obligation . at december 31 , 2016 , we held approximately .8 million shares of blackrock series c preferred stock which were available to fund our obligations . see note 23 subsequent events for information on our february 1 , 2017 transfer of .5 million shares of the series c preferred stock to blackrock to satisfy a portion of our ltip obligation . we account for our blackrock series c preferred stock at fair value , which offsets the impact of marking-to-market the obligation to deliver these shares to blackrock . see note 6 fair value for additional information regarding the valuation of the blackrock series c preferred stock . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 139 .\nQuestion: what was the intrinsic value of incentive/performance unit and restricted share/ restricted share unit awards vested during 2016, in billions?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.1", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , options for 5 million and 6 million shares of common stock were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 55.42 and $ 56.21 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised was approximately $ .1 billion during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately $ .1 billion , $ .1 billion and $ .2 billion , respectively . the tax benefit realized from option exercises under all incentive plans was insignificant for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were approximately 39 million shares at december 31 , 2016 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under all equity compensation plans totaled approximately 40 million shares at december 31 , 2016 . during 2016 , we issued approximately 2 million common shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . incentive/performance unit awards and restricted share/restricted share unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit awards and restricted share/restricted share unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock on the date of grant with a reduction for estimated forfeitures . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals . additionally , certain incentive/ performance unit awards require subsequent adjustment to their current market value due to certain discretionary risk review triggers . the weighted-average grant date fair value of incentive/ performance unit awards and restricted share/restricted share unit awards granted in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 78.37 , $ 91.57 and $ 80.79 per share , respectively . the total intrinsic value of incentive/performance unit and restricted share/ restricted share unit awards vested during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately $ .1 billion , $ .2 billion and $ .1 billion , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . table 78 : nonvested incentive/performance unit awards and restricted share/restricted share unit awards 2013 rollforward ( a ) shares in millions nonvested incentive/ performance units shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted share/ restricted weighted- average grant date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>shares in millions december 31 2015</td><td>nonvested incentive/ performance units shares 2</td><td>weighted- average grant date fair value $ 79.27</td><td>nonvested restricted share/ restricted share units 3</td><td>weighted- average grant date fair value $ 79.26</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>granted ( b )</td><td>1</td><td>$ 77.77</td><td>1</td><td>$ 78.71</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vested/released ( b )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>$ 71.59</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>$ 65.53</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2016</td><td>2</td><td>$ 81.42</td><td>3</td><td>$ 83.27</td></tr></table> ( a ) forfeited awards during 2016 were insignificant . ( b ) includes adjustments for achieving specific performance goals for incentive/ performance unit share awards granted in prior periods . in table 78 , the units and related weighted-average grant date fair value of the incentive/performance unit share awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash if and when the underlying shares are issued to the participants . blackrock long-term incentive plans ( ltip ) blackrock adopted the 2002 ltip program to help attract and retain qualified professionals . at that time , we agreed to transfer up to four million shares of blackrock common stock to fund a portion of the 2002 ltip program and future ltip programs approved by blackrock 2019s board of directors . in 2009 , our obligation to deliver any remaining blackrock common shares was replaced with an obligation to deliver shares of blackrock 2019s series c preferred stock held by us . in 2016 , we transferred .5 million shares of blackrock series c preferred stock to blackrock in connection with our obligation . at december 31 , 2016 , we held approximately .8 million shares of blackrock series c preferred stock which were available to fund our obligations . see note 23 subsequent events for information on our february 1 , 2017 transfer of .5 million shares of the series c preferred stock to blackrock to satisfy a portion of our ltip obligation . we account for our blackrock series c preferred stock at fair value , which offsets the impact of marking-to-market the obligation to deliver these shares to blackrock . see note 6 fair value for additional information regarding the valuation of the blackrock series c preferred stock . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 139 .\nQuestion: what was the intrinsic value of incentive/performance unit and restricted share/ restricted share unit awards vested during 2016, in billions?\nAnswer: 0.1\nQuestion: what was the intrinsic value of incentive/performance unit and restricted share/ restricted share unit awards vested during 2015, in billions?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.2", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , options for 5 million and 6 million shares of common stock were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 55.42 and $ 56.21 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised was approximately $ .1 billion during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately $ .1 billion , $ .1 billion and $ .2 billion , respectively . the tax benefit realized from option exercises under all incentive plans was insignificant for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were approximately 39 million shares at december 31 , 2016 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under all equity compensation plans totaled approximately 40 million shares at december 31 , 2016 . during 2016 , we issued approximately 2 million common shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . incentive/performance unit awards and restricted share/restricted share unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit awards and restricted share/restricted share unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock on the date of grant with a reduction for estimated forfeitures . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals . additionally , certain incentive/ performance unit awards require subsequent adjustment to their current market value due to certain discretionary risk review triggers . the weighted-average grant date fair value of incentive/ performance unit awards and restricted share/restricted share unit awards granted in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 78.37 , $ 91.57 and $ 80.79 per share , respectively . the total intrinsic value of incentive/performance unit and restricted share/ restricted share unit awards vested during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately $ .1 billion , $ .2 billion and $ .1 billion , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . table 78 : nonvested incentive/performance unit awards and restricted share/restricted share unit awards 2013 rollforward ( a ) shares in millions nonvested incentive/ performance units shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted share/ restricted weighted- average grant date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>shares in millions december 31 2015</td><td>nonvested incentive/ performance units shares 2</td><td>weighted- average grant date fair value $ 79.27</td><td>nonvested restricted share/ restricted share units 3</td><td>weighted- average grant date fair value $ 79.26</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>granted ( b )</td><td>1</td><td>$ 77.77</td><td>1</td><td>$ 78.71</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vested/released ( b )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>$ 71.59</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>$ 65.53</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2016</td><td>2</td><td>$ 81.42</td><td>3</td><td>$ 83.27</td></tr></table> ( a ) forfeited awards during 2016 were insignificant . ( b ) includes adjustments for achieving specific performance goals for incentive/ performance unit share awards granted in prior periods . in table 78 , the units and related weighted-average grant date fair value of the incentive/performance unit share awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash if and when the underlying shares are issued to the participants . blackrock long-term incentive plans ( ltip ) blackrock adopted the 2002 ltip program to help attract and retain qualified professionals . at that time , we agreed to transfer up to four million shares of blackrock common stock to fund a portion of the 2002 ltip program and future ltip programs approved by blackrock 2019s board of directors . in 2009 , our obligation to deliver any remaining blackrock common shares was replaced with an obligation to deliver shares of blackrock 2019s series c preferred stock held by us . in 2016 , we transferred .5 million shares of blackrock series c preferred stock to blackrock in connection with our obligation . at december 31 , 2016 , we held approximately .8 million shares of blackrock series c preferred stock which were available to fund our obligations . see note 23 subsequent events for information on our february 1 , 2017 transfer of .5 million shares of the series c preferred stock to blackrock to satisfy a portion of our ltip obligation . we account for our blackrock series c preferred stock at fair value , which offsets the impact of marking-to-market the obligation to deliver these shares to blackrock . see note 6 fair value for additional information regarding the valuation of the blackrock series c preferred stock . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 139 .\nQuestion: what was the intrinsic value of incentive/performance unit and restricted share/ restricted share unit awards vested during 2016, in billions?\nAnswer: 0.1\nQuestion: what was the intrinsic value of incentive/performance unit and restricted share/ restricted share unit awards vested during 2015, in billions?\nAnswer: 0.2\nQuestion: what is the sum for 2015 and 2016?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.3", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , options for 5 million and 6 million shares of common stock were exercisable at a weighted-average price of $ 55.42 and $ 56.21 , respectively . the total intrinsic value of options exercised was approximately $ .1 billion during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 . cash received from option exercises under all incentive plans for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately $ .1 billion , $ .1 billion and $ .2 billion , respectively . the tax benefit realized from option exercises under all incentive plans was insignificant for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 . shares of common stock available during the next year for the granting of options and other awards under the incentive plans were approximately 39 million shares at december 31 , 2016 . total shares of pnc common stock authorized for future issuance under all equity compensation plans totaled approximately 40 million shares at december 31 , 2016 . during 2016 , we issued approximately 2 million common shares from treasury stock in connection with stock option exercise activity . as with past exercise activity , we currently intend to utilize primarily treasury stock for any future stock option exercises . incentive/performance unit awards and restricted share/restricted share unit awards the fair value of nonvested incentive/performance unit awards and restricted share/restricted share unit awards is initially determined based on prices not less than the market value of our common stock on the date of grant with a reduction for estimated forfeitures . the value of certain incentive/ performance unit awards is subsequently remeasured based on the achievement of one or more financial and other performance goals . additionally , certain incentive/ performance unit awards require subsequent adjustment to their current market value due to certain discretionary risk review triggers . the weighted-average grant date fair value of incentive/ performance unit awards and restricted share/restricted share unit awards granted in 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 78.37 , $ 91.57 and $ 80.79 per share , respectively . the total intrinsic value of incentive/performance unit and restricted share/ restricted share unit awards vested during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was approximately $ .1 billion , $ .2 billion and $ .1 billion , respectively . we recognize compensation expense for such awards ratably over the corresponding vesting and/or performance periods for each type of program . table 78 : nonvested incentive/performance unit awards and restricted share/restricted share unit awards 2013 rollforward ( a ) shares in millions nonvested incentive/ performance units shares weighted- average date fair nonvested restricted share/ restricted weighted- average grant date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>shares in millions december 31 2015</td><td>nonvested incentive/ performance units shares 2</td><td>weighted- average grant date fair value $ 79.27</td><td>nonvested restricted share/ restricted share units 3</td><td>weighted- average grant date fair value $ 79.26</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>granted ( b )</td><td>1</td><td>$ 77.77</td><td>1</td><td>$ 78.71</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>vested/released ( b )</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>$ 71.59</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td><td>$ 65.53</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2016</td><td>2</td><td>$ 81.42</td><td>3</td><td>$ 83.27</td></tr></table> ( a ) forfeited awards during 2016 were insignificant . ( b ) includes adjustments for achieving specific performance goals for incentive/ performance unit share awards granted in prior periods . in table 78 , the units and related weighted-average grant date fair value of the incentive/performance unit share awards exclude the effect of dividends on the underlying shares , as those dividends will be paid in cash if and when the underlying shares are issued to the participants . blackrock long-term incentive plans ( ltip ) blackrock adopted the 2002 ltip program to help attract and retain qualified professionals . at that time , we agreed to transfer up to four million shares of blackrock common stock to fund a portion of the 2002 ltip program and future ltip programs approved by blackrock 2019s board of directors . in 2009 , our obligation to deliver any remaining blackrock common shares was replaced with an obligation to deliver shares of blackrock 2019s series c preferred stock held by us . in 2016 , we transferred .5 million shares of blackrock series c preferred stock to blackrock in connection with our obligation . at december 31 , 2016 , we held approximately .8 million shares of blackrock series c preferred stock which were available to fund our obligations . see note 23 subsequent events for information on our february 1 , 2017 transfer of .5 million shares of the series c preferred stock to blackrock to satisfy a portion of our ltip obligation . we account for our blackrock series c preferred stock at fair value , which offsets the impact of marking-to-market the obligation to deliver these shares to blackrock . see note 6 fair value for additional information regarding the valuation of the blackrock series c preferred stock . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 139 .\nQuestion: what was the intrinsic value of incentive/performance unit and restricted share/ restricted share unit awards vested during 2016, in billions?\nAnswer: 0.1\nQuestion: what was the intrinsic value of incentive/performance unit and restricted share/ restricted share unit awards vested during 2015, in billions?\nAnswer: 0.2\nQuestion: what is the sum for 2015 and 2016?\nAnswer: 0.3\nQuestion: what is the total value including 2014?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.4", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) sales of businesses and investments 2013 primarily includes realized gains and losses relating to the sales of businesses , cumulative translation adjustment balances from the liquidation of entities and sales of marketable securities and investments in publicly traded and privately held companies in our rabbi trusts . during 2009 , we realized a gain of $ 15.2 related to the sale of an investment in our rabbi trusts , which was partially offset by losses realized from the sale of various businesses . losses in 2007 primarily related to the sale of several businesses within draftfcb for a loss of $ 9.3 and charges at lowe of $ 7.8 as a result of the realization of cumulative translation adjustment balances from the liquidation of several businesses . vendor discounts and credit adjustments 2013 we are in the process of settling our liabilities related to vendor discounts and credits established during the restatement we presented in our 2004 annual report on form 10-k . these adjustments reflect the reversal of certain of these liabilities as a result of settlements with clients or vendors or where the statute of limitations has lapsed . litigation settlement 2013 during may 2008 , the sec concluded its investigation that began in 2002 into our financial reporting practices , resulting in a settlement charge of $ 12.0 . investment impairments 2013 in 2007 we realized an other-than-temporary charge of $ 5.8 relating to a $ 12.5 investment in auction rate securities , representing our total investment in auction rate securities . see note 12 for further information . note 5 : intangible assets goodwill goodwill is the excess purchase price remaining from an acquisition after an allocation of purchase price has been made to identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values . the changes in the carrying value of goodwill for our segments , integrated agency networks ( 201cian 201d ) and constituency management group ( 201ccmg 201d ) , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 are listed below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>ian</td><td>cmg</td><td>total 1</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of december 31 2007</td><td>$ 2789.7</td><td>$ 441.9</td><td>$ 3231.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year acquisitions</td><td>99.5</td><td>1.8</td><td>101.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>contingent and deferred payments for prior acquisitions</td><td>28.9</td><td>1.1</td><td>30.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( primarily foreign currency translation )</td><td>-128.1 ( 128.1 )</td><td>-13.9 ( 13.9 )</td><td>-142.0 ( 142.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance as of december 31 2008</td><td>$ 2790.0</td><td>$ 430.9</td><td>$ 3220.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current year acquisitions2</td><td>5.2</td><td>2014</td><td>5.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>contingent and deferred payments for prior acquisitions</td><td>14.2</td><td>2014</td><td>14.2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( primarily foreign currency translation )</td><td>76.2</td><td>4.5</td><td>80.7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance as of december 31 2009</td><td>$ 2885.6</td><td>$ 435.4</td><td>$ 3321.0</td></tr></table> 1 for all periods presented we have not recorded a goodwill impairment charge . 2 for acquisitions completed after january 1 , 2009 , amount includes contingent and deferred payments , which are recorded at fair value on the acquisition date . see note 6 for further information . see note 1 for further information regarding our annual impairment methodology . other intangible assets included in other intangible assets are assets with indefinite lives not subject to amortization and assets with definite lives subject to amortization . other intangible assets primarily include customer lists and trade names . intangible assets with definitive lives subject to amortization are amortized on a straight-line basis with estimated useful lives generally between 7 and 15 years . amortization expense for other intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 19.3 , $ 14.4 and $ 8.5 , respectively . the following table provides a summary of other intangible assets , which are included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. .\nQuestion: what is the balance of the goodwill for integrated agency networks at the end of 2009?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "2885.6", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) sales of businesses and investments 2013 primarily includes realized gains and losses relating to the sales of businesses , cumulative translation adjustment balances from the liquidation of entities and sales of marketable securities and investments in publicly traded and privately held companies in our rabbi trusts . during 2009 , we realized a gain of $ 15.2 related to the sale of an investment in our rabbi trusts , which was partially offset by losses realized from the sale of various businesses . losses in 2007 primarily related to the sale of several businesses within draftfcb for a loss of $ 9.3 and charges at lowe of $ 7.8 as a result of the realization of cumulative translation adjustment balances from the liquidation of several businesses . vendor discounts and credit adjustments 2013 we are in the process of settling our liabilities related to vendor discounts and credits established during the restatement we presented in our 2004 annual report on form 10-k . these adjustments reflect the reversal of certain of these liabilities as a result of settlements with clients or vendors or where the statute of limitations has lapsed . litigation settlement 2013 during may 2008 , the sec concluded its investigation that began in 2002 into our financial reporting practices , resulting in a settlement charge of $ 12.0 . investment impairments 2013 in 2007 we realized an other-than-temporary charge of $ 5.8 relating to a $ 12.5 investment in auction rate securities , representing our total investment in auction rate securities . see note 12 for further information . note 5 : intangible assets goodwill goodwill is the excess purchase price remaining from an acquisition after an allocation of purchase price has been made to identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values . the changes in the carrying value of goodwill for our segments , integrated agency networks ( 201cian 201d ) and constituency management group ( 201ccmg 201d ) , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 are listed below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>ian</td><td>cmg</td><td>total 1</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of december 31 2007</td><td>$ 2789.7</td><td>$ 441.9</td><td>$ 3231.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year acquisitions</td><td>99.5</td><td>1.8</td><td>101.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>contingent and deferred payments for prior acquisitions</td><td>28.9</td><td>1.1</td><td>30.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( primarily foreign currency translation )</td><td>-128.1 ( 128.1 )</td><td>-13.9 ( 13.9 )</td><td>-142.0 ( 142.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance as of december 31 2008</td><td>$ 2790.0</td><td>$ 430.9</td><td>$ 3220.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current year acquisitions2</td><td>5.2</td><td>2014</td><td>5.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>contingent and deferred payments for prior acquisitions</td><td>14.2</td><td>2014</td><td>14.2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( primarily foreign currency translation )</td><td>76.2</td><td>4.5</td><td>80.7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance as of december 31 2009</td><td>$ 2885.6</td><td>$ 435.4</td><td>$ 3321.0</td></tr></table> 1 for all periods presented we have not recorded a goodwill impairment charge . 2 for acquisitions completed after january 1 , 2009 , amount includes contingent and deferred payments , which are recorded at fair value on the acquisition date . see note 6 for further information . see note 1 for further information regarding our annual impairment methodology . other intangible assets included in other intangible assets are assets with indefinite lives not subject to amortization and assets with definite lives subject to amortization . other intangible assets primarily include customer lists and trade names . intangible assets with definitive lives subject to amortization are amortized on a straight-line basis with estimated useful lives generally between 7 and 15 years . amortization expense for other intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 19.3 , $ 14.4 and $ 8.5 , respectively . the following table provides a summary of other intangible assets , which are included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. .\nQuestion: what is the balance of the goodwill for integrated agency networks at the end of 2009?\nAnswer: 2885.6\nQuestion: what about at the end of 2008?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "2790.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) sales of businesses and investments 2013 primarily includes realized gains and losses relating to the sales of businesses , cumulative translation adjustment balances from the liquidation of entities and sales of marketable securities and investments in publicly traded and privately held companies in our rabbi trusts . during 2009 , we realized a gain of $ 15.2 related to the sale of an investment in our rabbi trusts , which was partially offset by losses realized from the sale of various businesses . losses in 2007 primarily related to the sale of several businesses within draftfcb for a loss of $ 9.3 and charges at lowe of $ 7.8 as a result of the realization of cumulative translation adjustment balances from the liquidation of several businesses . vendor discounts and credit adjustments 2013 we are in the process of settling our liabilities related to vendor discounts and credits established during the restatement we presented in our 2004 annual report on form 10-k . these adjustments reflect the reversal of certain of these liabilities as a result of settlements with clients or vendors or where the statute of limitations has lapsed . litigation settlement 2013 during may 2008 , the sec concluded its investigation that began in 2002 into our financial reporting practices , resulting in a settlement charge of $ 12.0 . investment impairments 2013 in 2007 we realized an other-than-temporary charge of $ 5.8 relating to a $ 12.5 investment in auction rate securities , representing our total investment in auction rate securities . see note 12 for further information . note 5 : intangible assets goodwill goodwill is the excess purchase price remaining from an acquisition after an allocation of purchase price has been made to identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values . the changes in the carrying value of goodwill for our segments , integrated agency networks ( 201cian 201d ) and constituency management group ( 201ccmg 201d ) , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 are listed below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>ian</td><td>cmg</td><td>total 1</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of december 31 2007</td><td>$ 2789.7</td><td>$ 441.9</td><td>$ 3231.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year acquisitions</td><td>99.5</td><td>1.8</td><td>101.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>contingent and deferred payments for prior acquisitions</td><td>28.9</td><td>1.1</td><td>30.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( primarily foreign currency translation )</td><td>-128.1 ( 128.1 )</td><td>-13.9 ( 13.9 )</td><td>-142.0 ( 142.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance as of december 31 2008</td><td>$ 2790.0</td><td>$ 430.9</td><td>$ 3220.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current year acquisitions2</td><td>5.2</td><td>2014</td><td>5.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>contingent and deferred payments for prior acquisitions</td><td>14.2</td><td>2014</td><td>14.2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( primarily foreign currency translation )</td><td>76.2</td><td>4.5</td><td>80.7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance as of december 31 2009</td><td>$ 2885.6</td><td>$ 435.4</td><td>$ 3321.0</td></tr></table> 1 for all periods presented we have not recorded a goodwill impairment charge . 2 for acquisitions completed after january 1 , 2009 , amount includes contingent and deferred payments , which are recorded at fair value on the acquisition date . see note 6 for further information . see note 1 for further information regarding our annual impairment methodology . other intangible assets included in other intangible assets are assets with indefinite lives not subject to amortization and assets with definite lives subject to amortization . other intangible assets primarily include customer lists and trade names . intangible assets with definitive lives subject to amortization are amortized on a straight-line basis with estimated useful lives generally between 7 and 15 years . amortization expense for other intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 19.3 , $ 14.4 and $ 8.5 , respectively . the following table provides a summary of other intangible assets , which are included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. .\nQuestion: what is the balance of the goodwill for integrated agency networks at the end of 2009?\nAnswer: 2885.6\nQuestion: what about at the end of 2008?\nAnswer: 2790.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "95.6", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) sales of businesses and investments 2013 primarily includes realized gains and losses relating to the sales of businesses , cumulative translation adjustment balances from the liquidation of entities and sales of marketable securities and investments in publicly traded and privately held companies in our rabbi trusts . during 2009 , we realized a gain of $ 15.2 related to the sale of an investment in our rabbi trusts , which was partially offset by losses realized from the sale of various businesses . losses in 2007 primarily related to the sale of several businesses within draftfcb for a loss of $ 9.3 and charges at lowe of $ 7.8 as a result of the realization of cumulative translation adjustment balances from the liquidation of several businesses . vendor discounts and credit adjustments 2013 we are in the process of settling our liabilities related to vendor discounts and credits established during the restatement we presented in our 2004 annual report on form 10-k . these adjustments reflect the reversal of certain of these liabilities as a result of settlements with clients or vendors or where the statute of limitations has lapsed . litigation settlement 2013 during may 2008 , the sec concluded its investigation that began in 2002 into our financial reporting practices , resulting in a settlement charge of $ 12.0 . investment impairments 2013 in 2007 we realized an other-than-temporary charge of $ 5.8 relating to a $ 12.5 investment in auction rate securities , representing our total investment in auction rate securities . see note 12 for further information . note 5 : intangible assets goodwill goodwill is the excess purchase price remaining from an acquisition after an allocation of purchase price has been made to identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimated fair values . the changes in the carrying value of goodwill for our segments , integrated agency networks ( 201cian 201d ) and constituency management group ( 201ccmg 201d ) , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 are listed below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>ian</td><td>cmg</td><td>total 1</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of december 31 2007</td><td>$ 2789.7</td><td>$ 441.9</td><td>$ 3231.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current year acquisitions</td><td>99.5</td><td>1.8</td><td>101.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>contingent and deferred payments for prior acquisitions</td><td>28.9</td><td>1.1</td><td>30.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( primarily foreign currency translation )</td><td>-128.1 ( 128.1 )</td><td>-13.9 ( 13.9 )</td><td>-142.0 ( 142.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance as of december 31 2008</td><td>$ 2790.0</td><td>$ 430.9</td><td>$ 3220.9</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current year acquisitions2</td><td>5.2</td><td>2014</td><td>5.2</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>contingent and deferred payments for prior acquisitions</td><td>14.2</td><td>2014</td><td>14.2</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( primarily foreign currency translation )</td><td>76.2</td><td>4.5</td><td>80.7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance as of december 31 2009</td><td>$ 2885.6</td><td>$ 435.4</td><td>$ 3321.0</td></tr></table> 1 for all periods presented we have not recorded a goodwill impairment charge . 2 for acquisitions completed after january 1 , 2009 , amount includes contingent and deferred payments , which are recorded at fair value on the acquisition date . see note 6 for further information . see note 1 for further information regarding our annual impairment methodology . other intangible assets included in other intangible assets are assets with indefinite lives not subject to amortization and assets with definite lives subject to amortization . other intangible assets primarily include customer lists and trade names . intangible assets with definitive lives subject to amortization are amortized on a straight-line basis with estimated useful lives generally between 7 and 15 years . amortization expense for other intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 19.3 , $ 14.4 and $ 8.5 , respectively . the following table provides a summary of other intangible assets , which are included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. .\nQuestion: what is the balance of the goodwill for integrated agency networks at the end of 2009?\nAnswer: 2885.6\nQuestion: what about at the end of 2008?\nAnswer: 2790.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 95.6\nQuestion: what percentage does this represent?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.03427", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: potentially responsible parties , and existing technology , laws , and regulations . the ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties involved , site- specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties , the degree of contamination by various wastes , the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites , and the speculative nature of remediation costs . current obligations are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use third-party actuaries to assist us with measuring the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . annual expenses for personal injury-related events were $ 240 million in 2006 , $ 247 million in 2005 , and $ 288 million in 2004 . as of december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had accrued liabilities of $ 631 million and $ 619 million for future personal injury costs , respectively , of which $ 233 million and $ 274 million was recorded in current liabilities as accrued casualty costs , respectively . our personal injury liability is discounted to present value using applicable u.s . treasury rates . approximately 87% ( 87 % ) of the recorded liability related to asserted claims , and approximately 13% ( 13 % ) related to unasserted claims . estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation . our personal injury claims activity was as follows : claims activity 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>claims activity</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>open claims beginning balance</td><td>4197</td><td>4028</td><td>4085</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>new claims</td><td>4190</td><td>4584</td><td>4366</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>settled or dismissed claims</td><td>-4261 ( 4261 )</td><td>-4415 ( 4415 )</td><td>-4423 ( 4423 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>open claims ending balance at december 31</td><td>4126</td><td>4197</td><td>4028</td></tr></table> depreciation 2013 the railroad industry is capital intensive . properties are carried at cost . provisions for depreciation are computed principally on the straight-line method based on estimated service lives of depreciable property . the lives are calculated using a separate composite annual percentage rate for each depreciable property group , based on the results of internal depreciation studies . we are required to submit a report on depreciation studies and proposed depreciation rates to the stb for review and approval every three years for equipment property and every six years for road property . the cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable railroad property retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation , and no gain or loss is recognized . a gain or loss is recognized in other income for all other property upon disposition because the gain or loss is not part of rail operations . the cost of internally developed software is capitalized and amortized over a five-year period . significant capital spending in recent years increased the total value of our depreciable assets . cash capital spending totaled $ 2.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , depreciation expense was $ 1.2 billion . we use various methods to estimate useful lives for each group of depreciable property . due to the capital intensive nature of the business and the large base of depreciable assets , variances to those estimates could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements . if the estimated useful lives of all depreciable assets were increased by one year , annual depreciation expense would decrease by approximately $ 43 million . if the estimated useful lives of all assets to be depreciated were decreased by one year , annual depreciation expense would increase by approximately $ 45 million . income taxes 2013 as required under fasb statement no . 109 , accounting for income taxes , we account for income taxes by recording taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns . these .\nQuestion: what was the difference in the beginning balance of open claims between 2005 and 2006?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "169.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: potentially responsible parties , and existing technology , laws , and regulations . the ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties involved , site- specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties , the degree of contamination by various wastes , the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites , and the speculative nature of remediation costs . current obligations are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use third-party actuaries to assist us with measuring the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . annual expenses for personal injury-related events were $ 240 million in 2006 , $ 247 million in 2005 , and $ 288 million in 2004 . as of december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had accrued liabilities of $ 631 million and $ 619 million for future personal injury costs , respectively , of which $ 233 million and $ 274 million was recorded in current liabilities as accrued casualty costs , respectively . our personal injury liability is discounted to present value using applicable u.s . treasury rates . approximately 87% ( 87 % ) of the recorded liability related to asserted claims , and approximately 13% ( 13 % ) related to unasserted claims . estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation . our personal injury claims activity was as follows : claims activity 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>claims activity</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>open claims beginning balance</td><td>4197</td><td>4028</td><td>4085</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>new claims</td><td>4190</td><td>4584</td><td>4366</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>settled or dismissed claims</td><td>-4261 ( 4261 )</td><td>-4415 ( 4415 )</td><td>-4423 ( 4423 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>open claims ending balance at december 31</td><td>4126</td><td>4197</td><td>4028</td></tr></table> depreciation 2013 the railroad industry is capital intensive . properties are carried at cost . provisions for depreciation are computed principally on the straight-line method based on estimated service lives of depreciable property . the lives are calculated using a separate composite annual percentage rate for each depreciable property group , based on the results of internal depreciation studies . we are required to submit a report on depreciation studies and proposed depreciation rates to the stb for review and approval every three years for equipment property and every six years for road property . the cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable railroad property retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation , and no gain or loss is recognized . a gain or loss is recognized in other income for all other property upon disposition because the gain or loss is not part of rail operations . the cost of internally developed software is capitalized and amortized over a five-year period . significant capital spending in recent years increased the total value of our depreciable assets . cash capital spending totaled $ 2.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , depreciation expense was $ 1.2 billion . we use various methods to estimate useful lives for each group of depreciable property . due to the capital intensive nature of the business and the large base of depreciable assets , variances to those estimates could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements . if the estimated useful lives of all depreciable assets were increased by one year , annual depreciation expense would decrease by approximately $ 43 million . if the estimated useful lives of all assets to be depreciated were decreased by one year , annual depreciation expense would increase by approximately $ 45 million . income taxes 2013 as required under fasb statement no . 109 , accounting for income taxes , we account for income taxes by recording taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns . these .\nQuestion: what was the difference in the beginning balance of open claims between 2005 and 2006?\nAnswer: 169.0\nQuestion: so what was the percentage change during this time?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.04196", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: note 4 : property , plant and equipment the following table summarizes the major classes of property , plant and equipment by category as of december 31 : 2015 2014 range of remaining useful weighted average useful life utility plant : land and other non-depreciable assets . . . . . . . . . . $ 141 $ 137 sources of supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 705 681 12 to 127 years 51 years treatment and pumping facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3070 2969 3 to 101 years 39 years transmission and distribution facilities . . . . . . . . . 8516 7963 9 to 156 years 83 years services , meters and fire hydrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3250 3062 8 to 93 years 35 years general structures and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1227 1096 1 to 154 years 39 years waste treatment , pumping and disposal . . . . . . . . . 313 281 2 to 115 years 46 years waste collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 473 399 5 to 109 years 56 years construction work in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404 303 total utility plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18099 16891 nonutility property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405 378 3 to 50 years 6 years total property , plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 18504 $ 17269 property , plant and equipment depreciation expense amounted to $ 405 , $ 392 , and $ 374 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively and was included in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . the provision for depreciation expressed as a percentage of the aggregate average depreciable asset balances was 3.13% ( 3.13 % ) for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and 3.20% ( 3.20 % ) for years december 31 , 2014 and 2013 . note 5 : allowance for uncollectible accounts the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s allowances for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td><td>$ -34 ( 34 )</td><td>$ -27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amounts charged to expense</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>-37 ( 37 )</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amounts written off</td><td>38</td><td>43</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>recoveries of amounts written off</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance as of december 31</td><td>$ -39 ( 39 )</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td><td>$ -34 ( 34 )</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the change in the property, plant and equipment depreciation expense from 2013 to 2015?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "31.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: note 4 : property , plant and equipment the following table summarizes the major classes of property , plant and equipment by category as of december 31 : 2015 2014 range of remaining useful weighted average useful life utility plant : land and other non-depreciable assets . . . . . . . . . . $ 141 $ 137 sources of supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 705 681 12 to 127 years 51 years treatment and pumping facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3070 2969 3 to 101 years 39 years transmission and distribution facilities . . . . . . . . . 8516 7963 9 to 156 years 83 years services , meters and fire hydrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3250 3062 8 to 93 years 35 years general structures and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1227 1096 1 to 154 years 39 years waste treatment , pumping and disposal . . . . . . . . . 313 281 2 to 115 years 46 years waste collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 473 399 5 to 109 years 56 years construction work in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404 303 total utility plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18099 16891 nonutility property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405 378 3 to 50 years 6 years total property , plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 18504 $ 17269 property , plant and equipment depreciation expense amounted to $ 405 , $ 392 , and $ 374 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively and was included in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . the provision for depreciation expressed as a percentage of the aggregate average depreciable asset balances was 3.13% ( 3.13 % ) for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and 3.20% ( 3.20 % ) for years december 31 , 2014 and 2013 . note 5 : allowance for uncollectible accounts the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s allowances for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td><td>$ -34 ( 34 )</td><td>$ -27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amounts charged to expense</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>-37 ( 37 )</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amounts written off</td><td>38</td><td>43</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>recoveries of amounts written off</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance as of december 31</td><td>$ -39 ( 39 )</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td><td>$ -34 ( 34 )</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the change in the property, plant and equipment depreciation expense from 2013 to 2015?\nAnswer: 31.0\nQuestion: and what was that expense in 2013?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "374.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: note 4 : property , plant and equipment the following table summarizes the major classes of property , plant and equipment by category as of december 31 : 2015 2014 range of remaining useful weighted average useful life utility plant : land and other non-depreciable assets . . . . . . . . . . $ 141 $ 137 sources of supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 705 681 12 to 127 years 51 years treatment and pumping facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3070 2969 3 to 101 years 39 years transmission and distribution facilities . . . . . . . . . 8516 7963 9 to 156 years 83 years services , meters and fire hydrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3250 3062 8 to 93 years 35 years general structures and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1227 1096 1 to 154 years 39 years waste treatment , pumping and disposal . . . . . . . . . 313 281 2 to 115 years 46 years waste collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 473 399 5 to 109 years 56 years construction work in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404 303 total utility plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18099 16891 nonutility property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405 378 3 to 50 years 6 years total property , plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 18504 $ 17269 property , plant and equipment depreciation expense amounted to $ 405 , $ 392 , and $ 374 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively and was included in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . the provision for depreciation expressed as a percentage of the aggregate average depreciable asset balances was 3.13% ( 3.13 % ) for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and 3.20% ( 3.20 % ) for years december 31 , 2014 and 2013 . note 5 : allowance for uncollectible accounts the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s allowances for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td><td>$ -34 ( 34 )</td><td>$ -27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amounts charged to expense</td><td>-32 ( 32 )</td><td>-37 ( 37 )</td><td>-27 ( 27 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>amounts written off</td><td>38</td><td>43</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>recoveries of amounts written off</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance as of december 31</td><td>$ -39 ( 39 )</td><td>$ -35 ( 35 )</td><td>$ -34 ( 34 )</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what was the change in the property, plant and equipment depreciation expense from 2013 to 2015?\nAnswer: 31.0\nQuestion: and what was that expense in 2013?\nAnswer: 374.0\nQuestion: how much does that change represent in relation to this 2013 expense?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.08289", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: a valuation allowance has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to the impairment of investments . accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2011 and 2010 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : beginning balance gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions settlements with taxing authorities lapse of statute of limitations foreign exchange gains and losses ending balance $ 156925 11901 ( 4154 ) 32420 ( 29101 ) ( 3825 ) $ 163607 $ 218040 ( 7104 ) 15108 ( 70484 ) ( 7896 ) $ 156925 as of december 2 , 2011 , the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns and included in non-current income taxes payable was approximately $ 12.3 million . we file income tax returns in the u.s . on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are the u.s. , ireland and california . for california , ireland and the u.s. , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2005 , 2006 and 2008 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from the current examination . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . in august 2011 , a canadian income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2005 through 2008 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was approximately $ 35 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we reclassified approximately $ 17 million to short-term income taxes payable and decreased deferred tax assets by approximately $ 18 million in conjunction with the aforementioned resolution . the $ 17 million balance in short-term income taxes payable is partially secured by a letter of credit and is expected to be paid by the first quarter of fiscal 2012 . in october 2010 , a u.s . income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2005 through 2007 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was $ 59 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we paid $ 20 million in conjunction with the aforementioned resolution . a net income statement tax benefit in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 of $ 39 million resulted . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of current and non-current assets and liabilities . the company believes that before the end of fiscal 2012 , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both . given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential decreases in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 40 million . these amounts would decrease income tax expense under current gaap related to income taxes . note 11 . restructuring fiscal 2011 restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 , in order to better align our resources around our digital media and digital marketing strategies , we initiated a restructuring plan consisting of reductions of approximately 700 full-time positions worldwide and we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $ 78.6 million related to ongoing termination benefits for the position eliminated . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 156925</td><td>$ 218040</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions</td><td>11901</td><td>9580</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions</td><td>-4154 ( 4154 )</td><td>-7104 ( 7104 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions</td><td>32420</td><td>15108</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-29101 ( 29101 )</td><td>-70484 ( 70484 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-3825 ( 3825 )</td><td>-7896 ( 7896 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>foreign exchange gains and losses</td><td>-559 ( 559 )</td><td>-319 ( 319 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 163607</td><td>$ 156925</td></tr></table> a valuation allowance has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to the impairment of investments . accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2011 and 2010 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : beginning balance gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions settlements with taxing authorities lapse of statute of limitations foreign exchange gains and losses ending balance $ 156925 11901 ( 4154 ) 32420 ( 29101 ) ( 3825 ) $ 163607 $ 218040 ( 7104 ) 15108 ( 70484 ) ( 7896 ) $ 156925 as of december 2 , 2011 , the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns and included in non-current income taxes payable was approximately $ 12.3 million . we file income tax returns in the u.s . on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are the u.s. , ireland and california . for california , ireland and the u.s. , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2005 , 2006 and 2008 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from the current examination . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . in august 2011 , a canadian income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2005 through 2008 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was approximately $ 35 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we reclassified approximately $ 17 million to short-term income taxes payable and decreased deferred tax assets by approximately $ 18 million in conjunction with the aforementioned resolution . the $ 17 million balance in short-term income taxes payable is partially secured by a letter of credit and is expected to be paid by the first quarter of fiscal 2012 . in october 2010 , a u.s . income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2005 through 2007 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was $ 59 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we paid $ 20 million in conjunction with the aforementioned resolution . a net income statement tax benefit in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 of $ 39 million resulted . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of current and non-current assets and liabilities . the company believes that before the end of fiscal 2012 , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both . given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential decreases in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 40 million . these amounts would decrease income tax expense under current gaap related to income taxes . note 11 . restructuring fiscal 2011 restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 , in order to better align our resources around our digital media and digital marketing strategies , we initiated a restructuring plan consisting of reductions of approximately 700 full-time positions worldwide and we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $ 78.6 million related to ongoing termination benefits for the position eliminated . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what was the change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during the year of 2010?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "-61115.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: a valuation allowance has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to the impairment of investments . accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2011 and 2010 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : beginning balance gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions settlements with taxing authorities lapse of statute of limitations foreign exchange gains and losses ending balance $ 156925 11901 ( 4154 ) 32420 ( 29101 ) ( 3825 ) $ 163607 $ 218040 ( 7104 ) 15108 ( 70484 ) ( 7896 ) $ 156925 as of december 2 , 2011 , the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns and included in non-current income taxes payable was approximately $ 12.3 million . we file income tax returns in the u.s . on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are the u.s. , ireland and california . for california , ireland and the u.s. , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2005 , 2006 and 2008 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from the current examination . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . in august 2011 , a canadian income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2005 through 2008 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was approximately $ 35 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we reclassified approximately $ 17 million to short-term income taxes payable and decreased deferred tax assets by approximately $ 18 million in conjunction with the aforementioned resolution . the $ 17 million balance in short-term income taxes payable is partially secured by a letter of credit and is expected to be paid by the first quarter of fiscal 2012 . in october 2010 , a u.s . income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2005 through 2007 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was $ 59 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we paid $ 20 million in conjunction with the aforementioned resolution . a net income statement tax benefit in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 of $ 39 million resulted . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of current and non-current assets and liabilities . the company believes that before the end of fiscal 2012 , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both . given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential decreases in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 40 million . these amounts would decrease income tax expense under current gaap related to income taxes . note 11 . restructuring fiscal 2011 restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 , in order to better align our resources around our digital media and digital marketing strategies , we initiated a restructuring plan consisting of reductions of approximately 700 full-time positions worldwide and we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $ 78.6 million related to ongoing termination benefits for the position eliminated . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 156925</td><td>$ 218040</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions</td><td>11901</td><td>9580</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions</td><td>-4154 ( 4154 )</td><td>-7104 ( 7104 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions</td><td>32420</td><td>15108</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>-29101 ( 29101 )</td><td>-70484 ( 70484 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-3825 ( 3825 )</td><td>-7896 ( 7896 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>foreign exchange gains and losses</td><td>-559 ( 559 )</td><td>-319 ( 319 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 163607</td><td>$ 156925</td></tr></table> a valuation allowance has been established for certain deferred tax assets related to the impairment of investments . accounting for uncertainty in income taxes during fiscal 2011 and 2010 , our aggregate changes in our total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits are summarized as follows ( in thousands ) : beginning balance gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions gross decreases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 prior year tax positions gross increases in unrecognized tax benefits 2013 current year tax positions settlements with taxing authorities lapse of statute of limitations foreign exchange gains and losses ending balance $ 156925 11901 ( 4154 ) 32420 ( 29101 ) ( 3825 ) $ 163607 $ 218040 ( 7104 ) 15108 ( 70484 ) ( 7896 ) $ 156925 as of december 2 , 2011 , the combined amount of accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions taken on our tax returns and included in non-current income taxes payable was approximately $ 12.3 million . we file income tax returns in the u.s . on a federal basis and in many u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . we are subject to the continual examination of our income tax returns by the irs and other domestic and foreign tax authorities . our major tax jurisdictions are the u.s. , ireland and california . for california , ireland and the u.s. , the earliest fiscal years open for examination are 2005 , 2006 and 2008 , respectively . we regularly assess the likelihood of outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and have reserved for potential adjustments that may result from the current examination . we believe such estimates to be reasonable ; however , there can be no assurance that the final determination of any of these examinations will not have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial position . in august 2011 , a canadian income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2005 through 2008 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was approximately $ 35 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we reclassified approximately $ 17 million to short-term income taxes payable and decreased deferred tax assets by approximately $ 18 million in conjunction with the aforementioned resolution . the $ 17 million balance in short-term income taxes payable is partially secured by a letter of credit and is expected to be paid by the first quarter of fiscal 2012 . in october 2010 , a u.s . income tax examination covering our fiscal years 2005 through 2007 was completed . our accrued tax and interest related to these years was $ 59 million and was previously reported in long-term income taxes payable . we paid $ 20 million in conjunction with the aforementioned resolution . a net income statement tax benefit in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 of $ 39 million resulted . the timing of the resolution of income tax examinations is highly uncertain as are the amounts and timing of tax payments that are part of any audit settlement process . these events could cause large fluctuations in the balance sheet classification of current and non-current assets and liabilities . the company believes that before the end of fiscal 2012 , it is reasonably possible that either certain audits will conclude or statutes of limitations on certain income tax examination periods will expire , or both . given the uncertainties described above , we can only determine a range of estimated potential decreases in underlying unrecognized tax benefits ranging from $ 0 to approximately $ 40 million . these amounts would decrease income tax expense under current gaap related to income taxes . note 11 . restructuring fiscal 2011 restructuring plan in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 , in order to better align our resources around our digital media and digital marketing strategies , we initiated a restructuring plan consisting of reductions of approximately 700 full-time positions worldwide and we recorded restructuring charges of approximately $ 78.6 million related to ongoing termination benefits for the position eliminated . table of contents adobe systems incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .\nQuestion: what was the change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits during the year of 2010?\nAnswer: -61115.0\nQuestion: and how much does that change represent in relation to the beginning balance of that year?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "-0.28029", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: fair valuation the following table shows the expected versus actual rate of return on plan assets for the u.s . pension and postretirement plans: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected rate of return</td><td>7.75% ( 7.75 % )</td><td>8.0% ( 8.0 % )</td><td>8.0% ( 8.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>actual rate of return</td><td>( 5.42 ) % ( % )</td><td>13.2% ( 13.2 % )</td><td>14.7% ( 14.7 % )</td></tr></table> for the foreign plans , pension expense for 2008 was reduced by the expected return of $ 487 million , compared with the actual return of $ ( 883 ) million . pension expense for 2007 and 2006 was reduced by expected returns of $ 477 million and $ 384 million , respectively . actual returns were higher in 2007 and 2006 than the expected returns in those years . discount rate the 2008 and 2007 discount rates for the u.s . pension and postretirement plans were selected by reference to a citigroup-specific analysis using each plan 2019s specific cash flows and compared with the moody 2019s aa long-term corporate bond yield for reasonableness . citigroup 2019s policy is to round to the nearest tenth of a percent . accordingly , at december 31 , 2008 , the discount rate was set at 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) for the pension plans and at 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) for the postretirement welfare plans . at december 31 , 2007 , the discount rate was set at 6.2% ( 6.2 % ) for the pension plans and 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) for the postretirement plans , referencing a citigroup-specific cash flow analysis . as of september 30 , 2006 , the u.s . pension plan was remeasured to reflect the freeze of benefits accruals for all non-grandfathered participants , effective january 1 , 2008 . under the september 30 , 2006 remeasurement and year-end analysis , the resulting plan-specific discount rate for the pension plan was 5.86% ( 5.86 % ) , which was rounded to 5.9% ( 5.9 % ) . the discount rates for the foreign pension and postretirement plans are selected by reference to high-quality corporate bond rates in countries that have developed corporate bond markets . however , where developed corporate bond markets do not exist , the discount rates are selected by reference to local government bond rates with a premium added to reflect the additional risk for corporate bonds . for additional information on the pension and postretirement plans , and on discount rates used in determining pension and postretirement benefit obligations and net benefit expense for the company 2019s plans , as well as the effects of a one percentage-point change in the expected rates of return and the discount rates , see note 9 to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements on page 144 . adoption of sfas 158 upon the adoption of sfas no . 158 , employer 2019s accounting for defined benefit pensions and other postretirement benefits ( sfas 158 ) , at december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded an after-tax charge to equity of $ 1.6 billion , which corresponds to the plans 2019 net pension and postretirement liabilities and the write-off of the existing prepaid asset , which relates to unamortized actuarial gains and losses , prior service costs/benefits and transition assets/liabilities . for a discussion of fair value of assets and liabilities , see 201csignificant accounting policies and significant estimates 201d on page 18 and notes 26 , 27 and 28 to the consolidated financial statements on pages 192 , 202 and 207. .\nQuestion: what was the net change in the expected return from 2007 to 2008?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "10.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: fair valuation the following table shows the expected versus actual rate of return on plan assets for the u.s . pension and postretirement plans: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected rate of return</td><td>7.75% ( 7.75 % )</td><td>8.0% ( 8.0 % )</td><td>8.0% ( 8.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>actual rate of return</td><td>( 5.42 ) % ( % )</td><td>13.2% ( 13.2 % )</td><td>14.7% ( 14.7 % )</td></tr></table> for the foreign plans , pension expense for 2008 was reduced by the expected return of $ 487 million , compared with the actual return of $ ( 883 ) million . pension expense for 2007 and 2006 was reduced by expected returns of $ 477 million and $ 384 million , respectively . actual returns were higher in 2007 and 2006 than the expected returns in those years . discount rate the 2008 and 2007 discount rates for the u.s . pension and postretirement plans were selected by reference to a citigroup-specific analysis using each plan 2019s specific cash flows and compared with the moody 2019s aa long-term corporate bond yield for reasonableness . citigroup 2019s policy is to round to the nearest tenth of a percent . accordingly , at december 31 , 2008 , the discount rate was set at 6.1% ( 6.1 % ) for the pension plans and at 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) for the postretirement welfare plans . at december 31 , 2007 , the discount rate was set at 6.2% ( 6.2 % ) for the pension plans and 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) for the postretirement plans , referencing a citigroup-specific cash flow analysis . as of september 30 , 2006 , the u.s . pension plan was remeasured to reflect the freeze of benefits accruals for all non-grandfathered participants , effective january 1 , 2008 . under the september 30 , 2006 remeasurement and year-end analysis , the resulting plan-specific discount rate for the pension plan was 5.86% ( 5.86 % ) , which was rounded to 5.9% ( 5.9 % ) . the discount rates for the foreign pension and postretirement plans are selected by reference to high-quality corporate bond rates in countries that have developed corporate bond markets . however , where developed corporate bond markets do not exist , the discount rates are selected by reference to local government bond rates with a premium added to reflect the additional risk for corporate bonds . for additional information on the pension and postretirement plans , and on discount rates used in determining pension and postretirement benefit obligations and net benefit expense for the company 2019s plans , as well as the effects of a one percentage-point change in the expected rates of return and the discount rates , see note 9 to the company 2019s consolidated financial statements on page 144 . adoption of sfas 158 upon the adoption of sfas no . 158 , employer 2019s accounting for defined benefit pensions and other postretirement benefits ( sfas 158 ) , at december 31 , 2006 , the company recorded an after-tax charge to equity of $ 1.6 billion , which corresponds to the plans 2019 net pension and postretirement liabilities and the write-off of the existing prepaid asset , which relates to unamortized actuarial gains and losses , prior service costs/benefits and transition assets/liabilities . for a discussion of fair value of assets and liabilities , see 201csignificant accounting policies and significant estimates 201d on page 18 and notes 26 , 27 and 28 to the consolidated financial statements on pages 192 , 202 and 207. .\nQuestion: what was the net change in the expected return from 2007 to 2008?\nAnswer: 10.0\nQuestion: what was the percent change?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.02096", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: related employer payroll tax costs ) . the contributions of these amounts are due by march 15 of the calendar year following the year in which the company realizes the benefits of the deductions . this arrangement has been accounted for as contingent consideration . pre-2009 business combinations were accounted for under a former accounting standard which , among other aspects , precluded the recognition of certain contingent consideration as of the business combination date . instead , under the former accounting standard , contingent consideration is accounted for as additional purchase price ( goodwill ) at the time the contingency is resolved . as of december 31 , 2013 , the company accrued $ 20.9 million related to this arrangement within other current liabilities , as the company realized the tax benefit of the compensation deductions during the 2013 tax year . the company made the related cash contribution during the first quarter of 2014 . 11 . earnings per share the numerator for both basic and diluted earnings per share is net income . the denominator for basic earnings per share is the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period . the 2013 denominator was impacted by the common shares issued during both the ipo and the underwriters' exercise in full of the overallotment option granted to them in connection with the ipo . because such common shares were issued on july 2 , 2013 and july 31 , 2013 , respectively , they are only partially reflected in the 2013 denominator . such shares are fully reflected in the 2014 denominator . see note 9 for additional discussion of the ipo . the dilutive effect of outstanding restricted stock , restricted stock units , stock options , coworker stock purchase plan units and mpk plan units is reflected in the denominator for diluted earnings per share using the treasury stock method . the following is a reconciliation of basic shares to diluted shares: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted-average shares - basic</td><td>170.6</td><td>156.6</td><td>145.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of dilutive securities</td><td>2.2</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average shares - diluted</td><td>172.8</td><td>158.7</td><td>145.8</td></tr></table> there was an insignificant amount of potential common shares excluded from diluted earnings per share for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , as their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect . 12 . deferred compensation plan on march 10 , 2010 , in connection with the company 2019s purchase of $ 28.5 million principal amount of its outstanding senior subordinated debt , the company established the restricted debt unit plan ( the 201crdu plan 201d ) , an unfunded nonqualified deferred compensation plan . the total number of rdus that could be granted under the rdu plan was 28500 . as of december 31 , 2014 , 28500 rdus were outstanding . rdus vested daily on a pro rata basis over the three-year period from january 1 , 2012 ( or , if later , the date of hire or the date of a subsequent rdu grant ) through december 31 , 2014 . all outstanding rdus were vested as of december 31 , 2014 . participants have no rights to the underlying debt . the total amount of compensation available to be paid under the rdu plan was initially to be based on two components , a principal component and an interest component . the principal component credits the rdu plan with a notional amount equal to the $ 28.5 million face value of the senior subordinated notes ( the \"debt pool\" ) , together with certain redemption premium equivalents as noted below . the interest component credited the rdu plan with amounts equal to the interest that would have been earned on the debt pool from march 10 , 2010 through maturity on october 12 , 2017 , except as discussed below . interest amounts for 2010 and 2011 were deferred until 2012 , and thereafter , interest amounts were paid to participants semi-annually on the interest payment due dates . the company used a portion of the ipo proceeds together with incremental borrowings to redeem $ 324.0 million of the total senior subordinated notes outstanding on august 1 , 2013 . in connection with the ipo and the partial redemption of the senior subordinated notes , the company amended the rdu plan to increase the retentive value of the plan . in accordance with the original terms of the rdu plan , the principal component of the rdus converted to a cash-denominated pool upon the redemption of the senior subordinated notes . in addition , the company added $ 0.1 table of contents cdw corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements .\nQuestion: what is the sum of the value of weighted average diluted shares in 2013 and 2014?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "331.5", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: related employer payroll tax costs ) . the contributions of these amounts are due by march 15 of the calendar year following the year in which the company realizes the benefits of the deductions . this arrangement has been accounted for as contingent consideration . pre-2009 business combinations were accounted for under a former accounting standard which , among other aspects , precluded the recognition of certain contingent consideration as of the business combination date . instead , under the former accounting standard , contingent consideration is accounted for as additional purchase price ( goodwill ) at the time the contingency is resolved . as of december 31 , 2013 , the company accrued $ 20.9 million related to this arrangement within other current liabilities , as the company realized the tax benefit of the compensation deductions during the 2013 tax year . the company made the related cash contribution during the first quarter of 2014 . 11 . earnings per share the numerator for both basic and diluted earnings per share is net income . the denominator for basic earnings per share is the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period . the 2013 denominator was impacted by the common shares issued during both the ipo and the underwriters' exercise in full of the overallotment option granted to them in connection with the ipo . because such common shares were issued on july 2 , 2013 and july 31 , 2013 , respectively , they are only partially reflected in the 2013 denominator . such shares are fully reflected in the 2014 denominator . see note 9 for additional discussion of the ipo . the dilutive effect of outstanding restricted stock , restricted stock units , stock options , coworker stock purchase plan units and mpk plan units is reflected in the denominator for diluted earnings per share using the treasury stock method . the following is a reconciliation of basic shares to diluted shares: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted-average shares - basic</td><td>170.6</td><td>156.6</td><td>145.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of dilutive securities</td><td>2.2</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average shares - diluted</td><td>172.8</td><td>158.7</td><td>145.8</td></tr></table> there was an insignificant amount of potential common shares excluded from diluted earnings per share for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , as their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect . 12 . deferred compensation plan on march 10 , 2010 , in connection with the company 2019s purchase of $ 28.5 million principal amount of its outstanding senior subordinated debt , the company established the restricted debt unit plan ( the 201crdu plan 201d ) , an unfunded nonqualified deferred compensation plan . the total number of rdus that could be granted under the rdu plan was 28500 . as of december 31 , 2014 , 28500 rdus were outstanding . rdus vested daily on a pro rata basis over the three-year period from january 1 , 2012 ( or , if later , the date of hire or the date of a subsequent rdu grant ) through december 31 , 2014 . all outstanding rdus were vested as of december 31 , 2014 . participants have no rights to the underlying debt . the total amount of compensation available to be paid under the rdu plan was initially to be based on two components , a principal component and an interest component . the principal component credits the rdu plan with a notional amount equal to the $ 28.5 million face value of the senior subordinated notes ( the \"debt pool\" ) , together with certain redemption premium equivalents as noted below . the interest component credited the rdu plan with amounts equal to the interest that would have been earned on the debt pool from march 10 , 2010 through maturity on october 12 , 2017 , except as discussed below . interest amounts for 2010 and 2011 were deferred until 2012 , and thereafter , interest amounts were paid to participants semi-annually on the interest payment due dates . the company used a portion of the ipo proceeds together with incremental borrowings to redeem $ 324.0 million of the total senior subordinated notes outstanding on august 1 , 2013 . in connection with the ipo and the partial redemption of the senior subordinated notes , the company amended the rdu plan to increase the retentive value of the plan . in accordance with the original terms of the rdu plan , the principal component of the rdus converted to a cash-denominated pool upon the redemption of the senior subordinated notes . in addition , the company added $ 0.1 table of contents cdw corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements .\nQuestion: what is the sum of the value of weighted average diluted shares in 2013 and 2014?\nAnswer: 331.5\nQuestion: what is the total sum including 2012?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "477.3", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: related employer payroll tax costs ) . the contributions of these amounts are due by march 15 of the calendar year following the year in which the company realizes the benefits of the deductions . this arrangement has been accounted for as contingent consideration . pre-2009 business combinations were accounted for under a former accounting standard which , among other aspects , precluded the recognition of certain contingent consideration as of the business combination date . instead , under the former accounting standard , contingent consideration is accounted for as additional purchase price ( goodwill ) at the time the contingency is resolved . as of december 31 , 2013 , the company accrued $ 20.9 million related to this arrangement within other current liabilities , as the company realized the tax benefit of the compensation deductions during the 2013 tax year . the company made the related cash contribution during the first quarter of 2014 . 11 . earnings per share the numerator for both basic and diluted earnings per share is net income . the denominator for basic earnings per share is the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period . the 2013 denominator was impacted by the common shares issued during both the ipo and the underwriters' exercise in full of the overallotment option granted to them in connection with the ipo . because such common shares were issued on july 2 , 2013 and july 31 , 2013 , respectively , they are only partially reflected in the 2013 denominator . such shares are fully reflected in the 2014 denominator . see note 9 for additional discussion of the ipo . the dilutive effect of outstanding restricted stock , restricted stock units , stock options , coworker stock purchase plan units and mpk plan units is reflected in the denominator for diluted earnings per share using the treasury stock method . the following is a reconciliation of basic shares to diluted shares: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted-average shares - basic</td><td>170.6</td><td>156.6</td><td>145.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>effect of dilutive securities</td><td>2.2</td><td>2.1</td><td>0.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average shares - diluted</td><td>172.8</td><td>158.7</td><td>145.8</td></tr></table> there was an insignificant amount of potential common shares excluded from diluted earnings per share for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , as their inclusion would have had an anti-dilutive effect . 12 . deferred compensation plan on march 10 , 2010 , in connection with the company 2019s purchase of $ 28.5 million principal amount of its outstanding senior subordinated debt , the company established the restricted debt unit plan ( the 201crdu plan 201d ) , an unfunded nonqualified deferred compensation plan . the total number of rdus that could be granted under the rdu plan was 28500 . as of december 31 , 2014 , 28500 rdus were outstanding . rdus vested daily on a pro rata basis over the three-year period from january 1 , 2012 ( or , if later , the date of hire or the date of a subsequent rdu grant ) through december 31 , 2014 . all outstanding rdus were vested as of december 31 , 2014 . participants have no rights to the underlying debt . the total amount of compensation available to be paid under the rdu plan was initially to be based on two components , a principal component and an interest component . the principal component credits the rdu plan with a notional amount equal to the $ 28.5 million face value of the senior subordinated notes ( the \"debt pool\" ) , together with certain redemption premium equivalents as noted below . the interest component credited the rdu plan with amounts equal to the interest that would have been earned on the debt pool from march 10 , 2010 through maturity on october 12 , 2017 , except as discussed below . interest amounts for 2010 and 2011 were deferred until 2012 , and thereafter , interest amounts were paid to participants semi-annually on the interest payment due dates . the company used a portion of the ipo proceeds together with incremental borrowings to redeem $ 324.0 million of the total senior subordinated notes outstanding on august 1 , 2013 . in connection with the ipo and the partial redemption of the senior subordinated notes , the company amended the rdu plan to increase the retentive value of the plan . in accordance with the original terms of the rdu plan , the principal component of the rdus converted to a cash-denominated pool upon the redemption of the senior subordinated notes . in addition , the company added $ 0.1 table of contents cdw corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements .\nQuestion: what is the sum of the value of weighted average diluted shares in 2013 and 2014?\nAnswer: 331.5\nQuestion: what is the total sum including 2012?\nAnswer: 477.3\nQuestion: what is the total sum divided by 3?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "159.1", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: securities have historically returned approximately 10% ( 10 % ) annually over long periods of time , while u.s . debt securities have returned approximately 6% ( 6 % ) annually over long periods . application of these historical returns to the plan 2019s allocation ranges for equities and bonds produces a result between 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) and 8.75% ( 8.75 % ) and is one point of reference , among many other factors , that is taken into consideration . we also examine the plan 2019s actual historical returns over various periods and consider the current economic environment . recent experience is considered in our evaluation with appropriate consideration that , especially for short time periods , recent returns are not reliable indicators of future returns . while annual returns can vary significantly ( actual returns for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 were +15.29% ( +15.29 % ) , +.11% ( +.11 % ) , and +14.87% ( +14.87 % ) , respectively ) , the selected assumption represents our estimated long-term average prospective returns . acknowledging the potentially wide range for this assumption , we also annually examine the assumption used by other companies with similar pension investment strategies , so that we can ascertain whether our determinations markedly differ from others . in all cases , however , this data simply informs our process , which places the greatest emphasis on our qualitative judgment of future investment returns , given the conditions existing at each annual measurement date . taking into consideration all of these factors , the expected long-term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension cost for 2012 was 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) , the same as it was for 2011 . after considering the views of both internal and external capital market advisors , particularly with regard to the effects of the recent economic environment on long-term prospective fixed income returns , we are reducing our expected long-term return on assets to 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) for determining pension cost for under current accounting rules , the difference between expected long-term returns and actual returns is accumulated and amortized to pension expense over future periods . each one percentage point difference in actual return compared with our expected return causes expense in subsequent years to increase or decrease by up to $ 8 million as the impact is amortized into results of operations . we currently estimate a pretax pension expense of $ 73 million in 2013 compared with pretax expense of $ 89 million in 2012 . this year-over-year expected decrease reflects the impact of favorable returns on plan assets experienced in 2012 as well as the effects of the lower discount rate required to be used in the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2013 estimated expense as a baseline . table 27 : pension expense - sensitivity analysis change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2013 pension expense ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>change in assumption ( a )</td><td>estimatedincrease to 2013pensionexpense ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate</td><td>$ 21</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets</td><td>$ 19</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate</td><td>$ 2</td></tr></table> ( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant . our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions . investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of required contributions in future years . also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan . we do not expect to be required by law to make any contributions to the plan during 2013 . we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees , which are described more fully in note 15 employee benefit plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 77 .\nQuestion: what is the pension pretax expenses in 2012?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "89.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: securities have historically returned approximately 10% ( 10 % ) annually over long periods of time , while u.s . debt securities have returned approximately 6% ( 6 % ) annually over long periods . application of these historical returns to the plan 2019s allocation ranges for equities and bonds produces a result between 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) and 8.75% ( 8.75 % ) and is one point of reference , among many other factors , that is taken into consideration . we also examine the plan 2019s actual historical returns over various periods and consider the current economic environment . recent experience is considered in our evaluation with appropriate consideration that , especially for short time periods , recent returns are not reliable indicators of future returns . while annual returns can vary significantly ( actual returns for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 were +15.29% ( +15.29 % ) , +.11% ( +.11 % ) , and +14.87% ( +14.87 % ) , respectively ) , the selected assumption represents our estimated long-term average prospective returns . acknowledging the potentially wide range for this assumption , we also annually examine the assumption used by other companies with similar pension investment strategies , so that we can ascertain whether our determinations markedly differ from others . in all cases , however , this data simply informs our process , which places the greatest emphasis on our qualitative judgment of future investment returns , given the conditions existing at each annual measurement date . taking into consideration all of these factors , the expected long-term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension cost for 2012 was 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) , the same as it was for 2011 . after considering the views of both internal and external capital market advisors , particularly with regard to the effects of the recent economic environment on long-term prospective fixed income returns , we are reducing our expected long-term return on assets to 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) for determining pension cost for under current accounting rules , the difference between expected long-term returns and actual returns is accumulated and amortized to pension expense over future periods . each one percentage point difference in actual return compared with our expected return causes expense in subsequent years to increase or decrease by up to $ 8 million as the impact is amortized into results of operations . we currently estimate a pretax pension expense of $ 73 million in 2013 compared with pretax expense of $ 89 million in 2012 . this year-over-year expected decrease reflects the impact of favorable returns on plan assets experienced in 2012 as well as the effects of the lower discount rate required to be used in the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2013 estimated expense as a baseline . table 27 : pension expense - sensitivity analysis change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2013 pension expense ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>change in assumption ( a )</td><td>estimatedincrease to 2013pensionexpense ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate</td><td>$ 21</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets</td><td>$ 19</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate</td><td>$ 2</td></tr></table> ( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant . our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions . investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of required contributions in future years . also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan . we do not expect to be required by law to make any contributions to the plan during 2013 . we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees , which are described more fully in note 15 employee benefit plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 77 .\nQuestion: what is the pension pretax expenses in 2012?\nAnswer: 89.0\nQuestion: what about in 2013?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "73.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: securities have historically returned approximately 10% ( 10 % ) annually over long periods of time , while u.s . debt securities have returned approximately 6% ( 6 % ) annually over long periods . application of these historical returns to the plan 2019s allocation ranges for equities and bonds produces a result between 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) and 8.75% ( 8.75 % ) and is one point of reference , among many other factors , that is taken into consideration . we also examine the plan 2019s actual historical returns over various periods and consider the current economic environment . recent experience is considered in our evaluation with appropriate consideration that , especially for short time periods , recent returns are not reliable indicators of future returns . while annual returns can vary significantly ( actual returns for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 were +15.29% ( +15.29 % ) , +.11% ( +.11 % ) , and +14.87% ( +14.87 % ) , respectively ) , the selected assumption represents our estimated long-term average prospective returns . acknowledging the potentially wide range for this assumption , we also annually examine the assumption used by other companies with similar pension investment strategies , so that we can ascertain whether our determinations markedly differ from others . in all cases , however , this data simply informs our process , which places the greatest emphasis on our qualitative judgment of future investment returns , given the conditions existing at each annual measurement date . taking into consideration all of these factors , the expected long-term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension cost for 2012 was 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) , the same as it was for 2011 . after considering the views of both internal and external capital market advisors , particularly with regard to the effects of the recent economic environment on long-term prospective fixed income returns , we are reducing our expected long-term return on assets to 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) for determining pension cost for under current accounting rules , the difference between expected long-term returns and actual returns is accumulated and amortized to pension expense over future periods . each one percentage point difference in actual return compared with our expected return causes expense in subsequent years to increase or decrease by up to $ 8 million as the impact is amortized into results of operations . we currently estimate a pretax pension expense of $ 73 million in 2013 compared with pretax expense of $ 89 million in 2012 . this year-over-year expected decrease reflects the impact of favorable returns on plan assets experienced in 2012 as well as the effects of the lower discount rate required to be used in the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2013 estimated expense as a baseline . table 27 : pension expense - sensitivity analysis change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2013 pension expense ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>change in assumption ( a )</td><td>estimatedincrease to 2013pensionexpense ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate</td><td>$ 21</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets</td><td>$ 19</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate</td><td>$ 2</td></tr></table> ( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant . our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions . investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of required contributions in future years . also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan . we do not expect to be required by law to make any contributions to the plan during 2013 . we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees , which are described more fully in note 15 employee benefit plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 77 .\nQuestion: what is the pension pretax expenses in 2012?\nAnswer: 89.0\nQuestion: what about in 2013?\nAnswer: 73.0\nQuestion: what is the change in the pension pretax expenses from 2012 to 2013?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "16.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: securities have historically returned approximately 10% ( 10 % ) annually over long periods of time , while u.s . debt securities have returned approximately 6% ( 6 % ) annually over long periods . application of these historical returns to the plan 2019s allocation ranges for equities and bonds produces a result between 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) and 8.75% ( 8.75 % ) and is one point of reference , among many other factors , that is taken into consideration . we also examine the plan 2019s actual historical returns over various periods and consider the current economic environment . recent experience is considered in our evaluation with appropriate consideration that , especially for short time periods , recent returns are not reliable indicators of future returns . while annual returns can vary significantly ( actual returns for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 were +15.29% ( +15.29 % ) , +.11% ( +.11 % ) , and +14.87% ( +14.87 % ) , respectively ) , the selected assumption represents our estimated long-term average prospective returns . acknowledging the potentially wide range for this assumption , we also annually examine the assumption used by other companies with similar pension investment strategies , so that we can ascertain whether our determinations markedly differ from others . in all cases , however , this data simply informs our process , which places the greatest emphasis on our qualitative judgment of future investment returns , given the conditions existing at each annual measurement date . taking into consideration all of these factors , the expected long-term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension cost for 2012 was 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) , the same as it was for 2011 . after considering the views of both internal and external capital market advisors , particularly with regard to the effects of the recent economic environment on long-term prospective fixed income returns , we are reducing our expected long-term return on assets to 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) for determining pension cost for under current accounting rules , the difference between expected long-term returns and actual returns is accumulated and amortized to pension expense over future periods . each one percentage point difference in actual return compared with our expected return causes expense in subsequent years to increase or decrease by up to $ 8 million as the impact is amortized into results of operations . we currently estimate a pretax pension expense of $ 73 million in 2013 compared with pretax expense of $ 89 million in 2012 . this year-over-year expected decrease reflects the impact of favorable returns on plan assets experienced in 2012 as well as the effects of the lower discount rate required to be used in the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2013 estimated expense as a baseline . table 27 : pension expense - sensitivity analysis change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2013 pension expense ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>change in assumption ( a )</td><td>estimatedincrease to 2013pensionexpense ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate</td><td>$ 21</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets</td><td>$ 19</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate</td><td>$ 2</td></tr></table> ( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant . our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions . investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of required contributions in future years . also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan . we do not expect to be required by law to make any contributions to the plan during 2013 . we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees , which are described more fully in note 15 employee benefit plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 77 .\nQuestion: what is the pension pretax expenses in 2012?\nAnswer: 89.0\nQuestion: what about in 2013?\nAnswer: 73.0\nQuestion: what is the change in the pension pretax expenses from 2012 to 2013?\nAnswer: 16.0\nQuestion: what fraction change does this represent?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.17978", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: securities have historically returned approximately 10% ( 10 % ) annually over long periods of time , while u.s . debt securities have returned approximately 6% ( 6 % ) annually over long periods . application of these historical returns to the plan 2019s allocation ranges for equities and bonds produces a result between 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) and 8.75% ( 8.75 % ) and is one point of reference , among many other factors , that is taken into consideration . we also examine the plan 2019s actual historical returns over various periods and consider the current economic environment . recent experience is considered in our evaluation with appropriate consideration that , especially for short time periods , recent returns are not reliable indicators of future returns . while annual returns can vary significantly ( actual returns for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 were +15.29% ( +15.29 % ) , +.11% ( +.11 % ) , and +14.87% ( +14.87 % ) , respectively ) , the selected assumption represents our estimated long-term average prospective returns . acknowledging the potentially wide range for this assumption , we also annually examine the assumption used by other companies with similar pension investment strategies , so that we can ascertain whether our determinations markedly differ from others . in all cases , however , this data simply informs our process , which places the greatest emphasis on our qualitative judgment of future investment returns , given the conditions existing at each annual measurement date . taking into consideration all of these factors , the expected long-term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension cost for 2012 was 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) , the same as it was for 2011 . after considering the views of both internal and external capital market advisors , particularly with regard to the effects of the recent economic environment on long-term prospective fixed income returns , we are reducing our expected long-term return on assets to 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) for determining pension cost for under current accounting rules , the difference between expected long-term returns and actual returns is accumulated and amortized to pension expense over future periods . each one percentage point difference in actual return compared with our expected return causes expense in subsequent years to increase or decrease by up to $ 8 million as the impact is amortized into results of operations . we currently estimate a pretax pension expense of $ 73 million in 2013 compared with pretax expense of $ 89 million in 2012 . this year-over-year expected decrease reflects the impact of favorable returns on plan assets experienced in 2012 as well as the effects of the lower discount rate required to be used in the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2013 estimated expense as a baseline . table 27 : pension expense - sensitivity analysis change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2013 pension expense ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>change in assumption ( a )</td><td>estimatedincrease to 2013pensionexpense ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate</td><td>$ 21</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets</td><td>$ 19</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate</td><td>$ 2</td></tr></table> ( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant . our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions . investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of required contributions in future years . also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan . we do not expect to be required by law to make any contributions to the plan during 2013 . we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees , which are described more fully in note 15 employee benefit plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 77 .\nQuestion: what is the pension pretax expenses in 2012?\nAnswer: 89.0\nQuestion: what about in 2013?\nAnswer: 73.0\nQuestion: what is the change in the pension pretax expenses from 2012 to 2013?\nAnswer: 16.0\nQuestion: what fraction change does this represent?\nAnswer: 0.17978\nQuestion: what about in percentage terms?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "17.97753", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: table of contents the following discussion of nonoperating income and expense excludes the results of the merger in order to provide a more meaningful year-over-year comparison . interest expense , net of capitalized interest decreased $ 249 million in 2014 from 2013 primarily due to a $ 149 million decrease in special charges recognized year-over-year as further described below , as well as refinancing activities that resulted in $ 100 million less interest expense recognized in 2014 . ( 1 ) in 2014 , we recognized $ 33 million of special charges relating to non-cash interest accretion on bankruptcy settlement obligations . in 2013 , we recognized $ 138 million of special charges relating to post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to american 2019s 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . in addition , in 2013 we recorded special charges of $ 44 million for debt extinguishment costs incurred as a result of the repayment of certain aircraft secured indebtedness , including cash interest charges and non-cash write offs of unamortized debt issuance costs . ( 2 ) as a result of the 2013 refinancing activities and the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes in 2014 , we recognized $ 100 million less interest expense in 2014 as compared to 2013 . other nonoperating expense , net in 2014 consisted of $ 114 million of net foreign currency losses , including a $ 43 million special charge for venezuelan foreign currency losses , and $ 56 million in other nonoperating special charges primarily due to early debt extinguishment costs related to the prepayment of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes and other indebtedness . the foreign currency losses were driven primarily by the strengthening of the u.s . dollar relative to other currencies during 2014 , principally in the latin american market , including a 48% ( 48 % ) decrease in the value of the venezuelan bolivar and a 14% ( 14 % ) decrease in the value of the brazilian real . other nonoperating expense , net in 2013 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 56 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 29 million . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on aag 2019s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2013 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )</td><td>$ 1733</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>325</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )</td><td>218</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>professional fees</td><td>199</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total reorganization items net</td><td>$ 2655</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , we agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing .\nQuestion: what were net currency losses in 2014?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "114.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: table of contents the following discussion of nonoperating income and expense excludes the results of the merger in order to provide a more meaningful year-over-year comparison . interest expense , net of capitalized interest decreased $ 249 million in 2014 from 2013 primarily due to a $ 149 million decrease in special charges recognized year-over-year as further described below , as well as refinancing activities that resulted in $ 100 million less interest expense recognized in 2014 . ( 1 ) in 2014 , we recognized $ 33 million of special charges relating to non-cash interest accretion on bankruptcy settlement obligations . in 2013 , we recognized $ 138 million of special charges relating to post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to american 2019s 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . in addition , in 2013 we recorded special charges of $ 44 million for debt extinguishment costs incurred as a result of the repayment of certain aircraft secured indebtedness , including cash interest charges and non-cash write offs of unamortized debt issuance costs . ( 2 ) as a result of the 2013 refinancing activities and the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes in 2014 , we recognized $ 100 million less interest expense in 2014 as compared to 2013 . other nonoperating expense , net in 2014 consisted of $ 114 million of net foreign currency losses , including a $ 43 million special charge for venezuelan foreign currency losses , and $ 56 million in other nonoperating special charges primarily due to early debt extinguishment costs related to the prepayment of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes and other indebtedness . the foreign currency losses were driven primarily by the strengthening of the u.s . dollar relative to other currencies during 2014 , principally in the latin american market , including a 48% ( 48 % ) decrease in the value of the venezuelan bolivar and a 14% ( 14 % ) decrease in the value of the brazilian real . other nonoperating expense , net in 2013 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 56 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 29 million . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on aag 2019s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2013 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )</td><td>$ 1733</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>325</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )</td><td>218</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>professional fees</td><td>199</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total reorganization items net</td><td>$ 2655</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , we agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing .\nQuestion: what were net currency losses in 2014?\nAnswer: 114.0\nQuestion: what were they in 2013?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "56.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: table of contents the following discussion of nonoperating income and expense excludes the results of the merger in order to provide a more meaningful year-over-year comparison . interest expense , net of capitalized interest decreased $ 249 million in 2014 from 2013 primarily due to a $ 149 million decrease in special charges recognized year-over-year as further described below , as well as refinancing activities that resulted in $ 100 million less interest expense recognized in 2014 . ( 1 ) in 2014 , we recognized $ 33 million of special charges relating to non-cash interest accretion on bankruptcy settlement obligations . in 2013 , we recognized $ 138 million of special charges relating to post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to american 2019s 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . in addition , in 2013 we recorded special charges of $ 44 million for debt extinguishment costs incurred as a result of the repayment of certain aircraft secured indebtedness , including cash interest charges and non-cash write offs of unamortized debt issuance costs . ( 2 ) as a result of the 2013 refinancing activities and the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes in 2014 , we recognized $ 100 million less interest expense in 2014 as compared to 2013 . other nonoperating expense , net in 2014 consisted of $ 114 million of net foreign currency losses , including a $ 43 million special charge for venezuelan foreign currency losses , and $ 56 million in other nonoperating special charges primarily due to early debt extinguishment costs related to the prepayment of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes and other indebtedness . the foreign currency losses were driven primarily by the strengthening of the u.s . dollar relative to other currencies during 2014 , principally in the latin american market , including a 48% ( 48 % ) decrease in the value of the venezuelan bolivar and a 14% ( 14 % ) decrease in the value of the brazilian real . other nonoperating expense , net in 2013 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 56 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 29 million . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on aag 2019s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2013 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )</td><td>$ 1733</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>325</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )</td><td>218</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>professional fees</td><td>199</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total reorganization items net</td><td>$ 2655</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , we agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing .\nQuestion: what were net currency losses in 2014?\nAnswer: 114.0\nQuestion: what were they in 2013?\nAnswer: 56.0\nQuestion: what is the net change in values?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "58.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: table of contents the following discussion of nonoperating income and expense excludes the results of the merger in order to provide a more meaningful year-over-year comparison . interest expense , net of capitalized interest decreased $ 249 million in 2014 from 2013 primarily due to a $ 149 million decrease in special charges recognized year-over-year as further described below , as well as refinancing activities that resulted in $ 100 million less interest expense recognized in 2014 . ( 1 ) in 2014 , we recognized $ 33 million of special charges relating to non-cash interest accretion on bankruptcy settlement obligations . in 2013 , we recognized $ 138 million of special charges relating to post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to american 2019s 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . in addition , in 2013 we recorded special charges of $ 44 million for debt extinguishment costs incurred as a result of the repayment of certain aircraft secured indebtedness , including cash interest charges and non-cash write offs of unamortized debt issuance costs . ( 2 ) as a result of the 2013 refinancing activities and the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes in 2014 , we recognized $ 100 million less interest expense in 2014 as compared to 2013 . other nonoperating expense , net in 2014 consisted of $ 114 million of net foreign currency losses , including a $ 43 million special charge for venezuelan foreign currency losses , and $ 56 million in other nonoperating special charges primarily due to early debt extinguishment costs related to the prepayment of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes and other indebtedness . the foreign currency losses were driven primarily by the strengthening of the u.s . dollar relative to other currencies during 2014 , principally in the latin american market , including a 48% ( 48 % ) decrease in the value of the venezuelan bolivar and a 14% ( 14 % ) decrease in the value of the brazilian real . other nonoperating expense , net in 2013 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 56 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 29 million . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on aag 2019s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2013 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )</td><td>$ 1733</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>325</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )</td><td>218</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>professional fees</td><td>199</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total reorganization items net</td><td>$ 2655</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , we agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing .\nQuestion: what were net currency losses in 2014?\nAnswer: 114.0\nQuestion: what were they in 2013?\nAnswer: 56.0\nQuestion: what is the net change in values?\nAnswer: 58.0\nQuestion: what was the 2013 value?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "56.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: table of contents the following discussion of nonoperating income and expense excludes the results of the merger in order to provide a more meaningful year-over-year comparison . interest expense , net of capitalized interest decreased $ 249 million in 2014 from 2013 primarily due to a $ 149 million decrease in special charges recognized year-over-year as further described below , as well as refinancing activities that resulted in $ 100 million less interest expense recognized in 2014 . ( 1 ) in 2014 , we recognized $ 33 million of special charges relating to non-cash interest accretion on bankruptcy settlement obligations . in 2013 , we recognized $ 138 million of special charges relating to post-petition interest expense on unsecured obligations pursuant to the plan and penalty interest related to american 2019s 10.5% ( 10.5 % ) secured notes and 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes . in addition , in 2013 we recorded special charges of $ 44 million for debt extinguishment costs incurred as a result of the repayment of certain aircraft secured indebtedness , including cash interest charges and non-cash write offs of unamortized debt issuance costs . ( 2 ) as a result of the 2013 refinancing activities and the early extinguishment of american 2019s 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes in 2014 , we recognized $ 100 million less interest expense in 2014 as compared to 2013 . other nonoperating expense , net in 2014 consisted of $ 114 million of net foreign currency losses , including a $ 43 million special charge for venezuelan foreign currency losses , and $ 56 million in other nonoperating special charges primarily due to early debt extinguishment costs related to the prepayment of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior secured notes and other indebtedness . the foreign currency losses were driven primarily by the strengthening of the u.s . dollar relative to other currencies during 2014 , principally in the latin american market , including a 48% ( 48 % ) decrease in the value of the venezuelan bolivar and a 14% ( 14 % ) decrease in the value of the brazilian real . other nonoperating expense , net in 2013 consisted principally of net foreign currency losses of $ 56 million and early debt extinguishment charges of $ 29 million . reorganization items , net reorganization items refer to revenues , expenses ( including professional fees ) , realized gains and losses and provisions for losses that are realized or incurred as a direct result of the chapter 11 cases . the following table summarizes the components included in reorganization items , net on aag 2019s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2013 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>labor-related deemed claim ( 1 )</td><td>$ 1733</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aircraft and facility financing renegotiations and rejections ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>325</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of conversion discount ( 4 )</td><td>218</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>professional fees</td><td>199</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total reorganization items net</td><td>$ 2655</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) in exchange for employees 2019 contributions to the successful reorganization , including agreeing to reductions in pay and benefits , we agreed in the plan to provide each employee group a deemed claim , which was used to provide a distribution of a portion of the equity of the reorganized entity to those employees . each employee group received a deemed claim amount based upon a portion of the value of cost savings provided by that group through reductions to pay and benefits as well as through certain work rule changes . the total value of this deemed claim was approximately $ 1.7 billion . ( 2 ) amounts include allowed claims ( claims approved by the bankruptcy court ) and estimated allowed claims relating to ( i ) the rejection or modification of financings related to aircraft and ( ii ) entry of orders treated as unsecured claims with respect to facility agreements supporting certain issuances of special facility revenue bonds . the debtors recorded an estimated claim associated with the rejection or modification of a financing .\nQuestion: what were net currency losses in 2014?\nAnswer: 114.0\nQuestion: what were they in 2013?\nAnswer: 56.0\nQuestion: what is the net change in values?\nAnswer: 58.0\nQuestion: what was the 2013 value?\nAnswer: 56.0\nQuestion: what is the percent change?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "1.03571", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements mexico litigation 2014one of the company 2019s subsidiaries , spectrasite communications , inc . ( 201csci 201d ) , is involved in a lawsuit brought in mexico against a former mexican subsidiary of sci ( the subsidiary of sci was sold in 2002 , prior to the company 2019s merger with sci 2019s parent in 2005 ) . the lawsuit concerns a terminated tower construction contract and related agreements with a wireless carrier in mexico . the primary issue for the company is whether sci itself can be found liable to the mexican carrier . the trial and lower appellate courts initially found that sci had no such liability in part because mexican courts do not have the necessary jurisdiction over sci . following several decisions by mexican appellate courts , including the supreme court of mexico , and related appeals by both parties , an intermediate appellate court issued a new decision that would , if enforceable , reimpose liability on sci in september 2010 . in its decision , the intermediate appellate court identified potential damages of approximately $ 6.7 million , and on october 14 , 2010 , the company filed a new constitutional appeal to again dispute the decision . as a result , at this stage of the proceeding , the company is unable to determine whether the liability imposed on sci by the september 2010 decision will survive or to estimate its share , if any , of that potential liability if the decision survives the pending appeal . xcel litigation 2014on june 3 , 2010 , horse-shoe capital ( 201chorse-shoe 201d ) , a company formed under the laws of the republic of mauritius , filed a complaint in the supreme court of the state of new york , new york county , with respect to horse-shoe 2019s sale of xcel to american tower mauritius ( 201catmauritius 201d ) , the company 2019s wholly-owned subsidiary formed under the laws of the republic of mauritius . the complaint names atmauritius , ati and the company as defendants , and the dispute concerns the timing and amount of distributions to be made by atmauritius to horse-shoe from a $ 7.5 million holdback escrow account and a $ 15.7 million tax escrow account , each established by the transaction agreements at closing . the complaint seeks release of the entire holdback escrow account , plus an additional $ 2.8 million , as well as the release of approximately $ 12.0 million of the tax escrow account . the complaint also seeks punitive damages in excess of $ 69.0 million . the company filed an answer to the complaint in august 2010 , disputing both the amounts alleged to be owed under the escrow agreements as well as the timing of the escrow distributions . the company also asserted in its answer that the demand for punitive damages is meritless . the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment concerning the release of the tax escrow account and in january 2011 the court granted the company 2019s motion for summary judgment , finding no obligation for the company to release the disputed portion of the tax escrow until 2013 . other claims are pending . the company is vigorously defending the lawsuit . lease obligations 2014the company leases certain land , office and tower space under operating leases that expire over various terms . many of the leases contain renewal options with specified increases in lease payments upon exercise of the renewal option . escalation clauses present in operating leases , excluding those tied to cpi or other inflation-based indices , are recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancellable term of the lease . future minimum rental payments under non-cancellable operating leases include payments for certain renewal periods at the company 2019s option because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable tower site and related revenues from tenant leases , thereby making it reasonably assured that the company will renew the lease . such payments in effect at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 257971</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>254575</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>251268</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>246392</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>238035</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2584332</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3832573</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the amount of future minimum rental payments due in 2011?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "257971.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements mexico litigation 2014one of the company 2019s subsidiaries , spectrasite communications , inc . ( 201csci 201d ) , is involved in a lawsuit brought in mexico against a former mexican subsidiary of sci ( the subsidiary of sci was sold in 2002 , prior to the company 2019s merger with sci 2019s parent in 2005 ) . the lawsuit concerns a terminated tower construction contract and related agreements with a wireless carrier in mexico . the primary issue for the company is whether sci itself can be found liable to the mexican carrier . the trial and lower appellate courts initially found that sci had no such liability in part because mexican courts do not have the necessary jurisdiction over sci . following several decisions by mexican appellate courts , including the supreme court of mexico , and related appeals by both parties , an intermediate appellate court issued a new decision that would , if enforceable , reimpose liability on sci in september 2010 . in its decision , the intermediate appellate court identified potential damages of approximately $ 6.7 million , and on october 14 , 2010 , the company filed a new constitutional appeal to again dispute the decision . as a result , at this stage of the proceeding , the company is unable to determine whether the liability imposed on sci by the september 2010 decision will survive or to estimate its share , if any , of that potential liability if the decision survives the pending appeal . xcel litigation 2014on june 3 , 2010 , horse-shoe capital ( 201chorse-shoe 201d ) , a company formed under the laws of the republic of mauritius , filed a complaint in the supreme court of the state of new york , new york county , with respect to horse-shoe 2019s sale of xcel to american tower mauritius ( 201catmauritius 201d ) , the company 2019s wholly-owned subsidiary formed under the laws of the republic of mauritius . the complaint names atmauritius , ati and the company as defendants , and the dispute concerns the timing and amount of distributions to be made by atmauritius to horse-shoe from a $ 7.5 million holdback escrow account and a $ 15.7 million tax escrow account , each established by the transaction agreements at closing . the complaint seeks release of the entire holdback escrow account , plus an additional $ 2.8 million , as well as the release of approximately $ 12.0 million of the tax escrow account . the complaint also seeks punitive damages in excess of $ 69.0 million . the company filed an answer to the complaint in august 2010 , disputing both the amounts alleged to be owed under the escrow agreements as well as the timing of the escrow distributions . the company also asserted in its answer that the demand for punitive damages is meritless . the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment concerning the release of the tax escrow account and in january 2011 the court granted the company 2019s motion for summary judgment , finding no obligation for the company to release the disputed portion of the tax escrow until 2013 . other claims are pending . the company is vigorously defending the lawsuit . lease obligations 2014the company leases certain land , office and tower space under operating leases that expire over various terms . many of the leases contain renewal options with specified increases in lease payments upon exercise of the renewal option . escalation clauses present in operating leases , excluding those tied to cpi or other inflation-based indices , are recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancellable term of the lease . future minimum rental payments under non-cancellable operating leases include payments for certain renewal periods at the company 2019s option because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable tower site and related revenues from tenant leases , thereby making it reasonably assured that the company will renew the lease . such payments in effect at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 257971</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>254575</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>251268</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>246392</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>238035</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2584332</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3832573</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the amount of future minimum rental payments due in 2011?\nAnswer: 257971.0\nQuestion: what is the amount of future minimum rental payments due in 2012?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "254575.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements mexico litigation 2014one of the company 2019s subsidiaries , spectrasite communications , inc . ( 201csci 201d ) , is involved in a lawsuit brought in mexico against a former mexican subsidiary of sci ( the subsidiary of sci was sold in 2002 , prior to the company 2019s merger with sci 2019s parent in 2005 ) . the lawsuit concerns a terminated tower construction contract and related agreements with a wireless carrier in mexico . the primary issue for the company is whether sci itself can be found liable to the mexican carrier . the trial and lower appellate courts initially found that sci had no such liability in part because mexican courts do not have the necessary jurisdiction over sci . following several decisions by mexican appellate courts , including the supreme court of mexico , and related appeals by both parties , an intermediate appellate court issued a new decision that would , if enforceable , reimpose liability on sci in september 2010 . in its decision , the intermediate appellate court identified potential damages of approximately $ 6.7 million , and on october 14 , 2010 , the company filed a new constitutional appeal to again dispute the decision . as a result , at this stage of the proceeding , the company is unable to determine whether the liability imposed on sci by the september 2010 decision will survive or to estimate its share , if any , of that potential liability if the decision survives the pending appeal . xcel litigation 2014on june 3 , 2010 , horse-shoe capital ( 201chorse-shoe 201d ) , a company formed under the laws of the republic of mauritius , filed a complaint in the supreme court of the state of new york , new york county , with respect to horse-shoe 2019s sale of xcel to american tower mauritius ( 201catmauritius 201d ) , the company 2019s wholly-owned subsidiary formed under the laws of the republic of mauritius . the complaint names atmauritius , ati and the company as defendants , and the dispute concerns the timing and amount of distributions to be made by atmauritius to horse-shoe from a $ 7.5 million holdback escrow account and a $ 15.7 million tax escrow account , each established by the transaction agreements at closing . the complaint seeks release of the entire holdback escrow account , plus an additional $ 2.8 million , as well as the release of approximately $ 12.0 million of the tax escrow account . the complaint also seeks punitive damages in excess of $ 69.0 million . the company filed an answer to the complaint in august 2010 , disputing both the amounts alleged to be owed under the escrow agreements as well as the timing of the escrow distributions . the company also asserted in its answer that the demand for punitive damages is meritless . the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment concerning the release of the tax escrow account and in january 2011 the court granted the company 2019s motion for summary judgment , finding no obligation for the company to release the disputed portion of the tax escrow until 2013 . other claims are pending . the company is vigorously defending the lawsuit . lease obligations 2014the company leases certain land , office and tower space under operating leases that expire over various terms . many of the leases contain renewal options with specified increases in lease payments upon exercise of the renewal option . escalation clauses present in operating leases , excluding those tied to cpi or other inflation-based indices , are recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancellable term of the lease . future minimum rental payments under non-cancellable operating leases include payments for certain renewal periods at the company 2019s option because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable tower site and related revenues from tenant leases , thereby making it reasonably assured that the company will renew the lease . such payments in effect at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 257971</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>254575</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>251268</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>246392</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>238035</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2584332</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3832573</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the amount of future minimum rental payments due in 2011?\nAnswer: 257971.0\nQuestion: what is the amount of future minimum rental payments due in 2012?\nAnswer: 254575.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "512546.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements mexico litigation 2014one of the company 2019s subsidiaries , spectrasite communications , inc . ( 201csci 201d ) , is involved in a lawsuit brought in mexico against a former mexican subsidiary of sci ( the subsidiary of sci was sold in 2002 , prior to the company 2019s merger with sci 2019s parent in 2005 ) . the lawsuit concerns a terminated tower construction contract and related agreements with a wireless carrier in mexico . the primary issue for the company is whether sci itself can be found liable to the mexican carrier . the trial and lower appellate courts initially found that sci had no such liability in part because mexican courts do not have the necessary jurisdiction over sci . following several decisions by mexican appellate courts , including the supreme court of mexico , and related appeals by both parties , an intermediate appellate court issued a new decision that would , if enforceable , reimpose liability on sci in september 2010 . in its decision , the intermediate appellate court identified potential damages of approximately $ 6.7 million , and on october 14 , 2010 , the company filed a new constitutional appeal to again dispute the decision . as a result , at this stage of the proceeding , the company is unable to determine whether the liability imposed on sci by the september 2010 decision will survive or to estimate its share , if any , of that potential liability if the decision survives the pending appeal . xcel litigation 2014on june 3 , 2010 , horse-shoe capital ( 201chorse-shoe 201d ) , a company formed under the laws of the republic of mauritius , filed a complaint in the supreme court of the state of new york , new york county , with respect to horse-shoe 2019s sale of xcel to american tower mauritius ( 201catmauritius 201d ) , the company 2019s wholly-owned subsidiary formed under the laws of the republic of mauritius . the complaint names atmauritius , ati and the company as defendants , and the dispute concerns the timing and amount of distributions to be made by atmauritius to horse-shoe from a $ 7.5 million holdback escrow account and a $ 15.7 million tax escrow account , each established by the transaction agreements at closing . the complaint seeks release of the entire holdback escrow account , plus an additional $ 2.8 million , as well as the release of approximately $ 12.0 million of the tax escrow account . the complaint also seeks punitive damages in excess of $ 69.0 million . the company filed an answer to the complaint in august 2010 , disputing both the amounts alleged to be owed under the escrow agreements as well as the timing of the escrow distributions . the company also asserted in its answer that the demand for punitive damages is meritless . the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment concerning the release of the tax escrow account and in january 2011 the court granted the company 2019s motion for summary judgment , finding no obligation for the company to release the disputed portion of the tax escrow until 2013 . other claims are pending . the company is vigorously defending the lawsuit . lease obligations 2014the company leases certain land , office and tower space under operating leases that expire over various terms . many of the leases contain renewal options with specified increases in lease payments upon exercise of the renewal option . escalation clauses present in operating leases , excluding those tied to cpi or other inflation-based indices , are recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancellable term of the lease . future minimum rental payments under non-cancellable operating leases include payments for certain renewal periods at the company 2019s option because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable tower site and related revenues from tenant leases , thereby making it reasonably assured that the company will renew the lease . such payments in effect at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 257971</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>254575</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>251268</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>246392</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>238035</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2584332</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3832573</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the amount of future minimum rental payments due in 2011?\nAnswer: 257971.0\nQuestion: what is the amount of future minimum rental payments due in 2012?\nAnswer: 254575.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 512546.0\nQuestion: what is the total future minimum rental payments?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "3832573.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements mexico litigation 2014one of the company 2019s subsidiaries , spectrasite communications , inc . ( 201csci 201d ) , is involved in a lawsuit brought in mexico against a former mexican subsidiary of sci ( the subsidiary of sci was sold in 2002 , prior to the company 2019s merger with sci 2019s parent in 2005 ) . the lawsuit concerns a terminated tower construction contract and related agreements with a wireless carrier in mexico . the primary issue for the company is whether sci itself can be found liable to the mexican carrier . the trial and lower appellate courts initially found that sci had no such liability in part because mexican courts do not have the necessary jurisdiction over sci . following several decisions by mexican appellate courts , including the supreme court of mexico , and related appeals by both parties , an intermediate appellate court issued a new decision that would , if enforceable , reimpose liability on sci in september 2010 . in its decision , the intermediate appellate court identified potential damages of approximately $ 6.7 million , and on october 14 , 2010 , the company filed a new constitutional appeal to again dispute the decision . as a result , at this stage of the proceeding , the company is unable to determine whether the liability imposed on sci by the september 2010 decision will survive or to estimate its share , if any , of that potential liability if the decision survives the pending appeal . xcel litigation 2014on june 3 , 2010 , horse-shoe capital ( 201chorse-shoe 201d ) , a company formed under the laws of the republic of mauritius , filed a complaint in the supreme court of the state of new york , new york county , with respect to horse-shoe 2019s sale of xcel to american tower mauritius ( 201catmauritius 201d ) , the company 2019s wholly-owned subsidiary formed under the laws of the republic of mauritius . the complaint names atmauritius , ati and the company as defendants , and the dispute concerns the timing and amount of distributions to be made by atmauritius to horse-shoe from a $ 7.5 million holdback escrow account and a $ 15.7 million tax escrow account , each established by the transaction agreements at closing . the complaint seeks release of the entire holdback escrow account , plus an additional $ 2.8 million , as well as the release of approximately $ 12.0 million of the tax escrow account . the complaint also seeks punitive damages in excess of $ 69.0 million . the company filed an answer to the complaint in august 2010 , disputing both the amounts alleged to be owed under the escrow agreements as well as the timing of the escrow distributions . the company also asserted in its answer that the demand for punitive damages is meritless . the parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment concerning the release of the tax escrow account and in january 2011 the court granted the company 2019s motion for summary judgment , finding no obligation for the company to release the disputed portion of the tax escrow until 2013 . other claims are pending . the company is vigorously defending the lawsuit . lease obligations 2014the company leases certain land , office and tower space under operating leases that expire over various terms . many of the leases contain renewal options with specified increases in lease payments upon exercise of the renewal option . escalation clauses present in operating leases , excluding those tied to cpi or other inflation-based indices , are recognized on a straight-line basis over the non-cancellable term of the lease . future minimum rental payments under non-cancellable operating leases include payments for certain renewal periods at the company 2019s option because failure to renew could result in a loss of the applicable tower site and related revenues from tenant leases , thereby making it reasonably assured that the company will renew the lease . such payments in effect at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 257971</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>254575</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>251268</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>246392</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>238035</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2584332</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3832573</td></tr></table> .\nQuestion: what is the amount of future minimum rental payments due in 2011?\nAnswer: 257971.0\nQuestion: what is the amount of future minimum rental payments due in 2012?\nAnswer: 254575.0\nQuestion: what is the sum?\nAnswer: 512546.0\nQuestion: what is the total future minimum rental payments?\nAnswer: 3832573.0\nQuestion: what is the sum of 2011 and 2012 divided by the total future minimum rental payments?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.13373", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2012 increased $ 69 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 105 million from c-130 programs due to an increase in risk retirements ; about $ 50 million from f-16 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries partially offset by a decline in risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million from f-35 production contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; and about $ 50 million from the completion of purchased intangible asset amortization on certain f-16 contracts . partially offsetting the increases was lower operating profit of about $ 90 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 50 million from decreased production volume and risk retirements on the f-22 program partially offset by a resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 45 million primarily due to a decrease in risk retirements on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit for c-5 programs was comparable to 2011 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 30 million lower for 2012 compared to 2011 . backlog backlog decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to lower orders on f-16 , c-5 , and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on the f-35 program . backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to lower orders on f-35 and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on f-16 programs . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 net sales to increase in 2014 in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2013 primarily due to an increase in net sales from f-35 production contracts . operating profit is expected to increase slightly from 2013 , resulting in a slight decrease in operating margins between the years due to program mix . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions , and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence , and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in federal information technology budgets . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8367</td><td>$ 8846</td><td>$ 9381</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>759</td><td>808</td><td>874</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.3% ( 9.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>8300</td><td>8700</td><td>9300</td></tr></table> 2013 compared to 2012 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 479 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of about $ 495 million due to decreased volume on various programs ( command and control programs for classified customers , ngi , and eram programs ) ; and approximately $ 320 million due to the completion of certain programs ( such as total information processing support services , the transportation worker identification credential ( twic ) , and odin ) . the decrease was partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 340 million due to the start-up of certain programs ( such as the disa gsm-o and the national science foundation antarctic support ) . is&gs 2019 operating profit decreased $ 49 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 55 million due to certain programs nearing the end of their lifecycles , partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 15 million due to the start-up of certain programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were comparable for 2013 compared to 2012 compared to 2011 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2012 decreased $ 535 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 485 million due to the substantial completion of various programs during 2011 ( primarily jtrs ; odin ; and u.k . census ) ; and about $ 255 million due to lower volume on numerous other programs ( primarily hanford; .\nQuestion: what was the overall total decline in net sales?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "815.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2012 increased $ 69 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 105 million from c-130 programs due to an increase in risk retirements ; about $ 50 million from f-16 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries partially offset by a decline in risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million from f-35 production contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; and about $ 50 million from the completion of purchased intangible asset amortization on certain f-16 contracts . partially offsetting the increases was lower operating profit of about $ 90 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 50 million from decreased production volume and risk retirements on the f-22 program partially offset by a resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 45 million primarily due to a decrease in risk retirements on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit for c-5 programs was comparable to 2011 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 30 million lower for 2012 compared to 2011 . backlog backlog decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to lower orders on f-16 , c-5 , and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on the f-35 program . backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to lower orders on f-35 and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on f-16 programs . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 net sales to increase in 2014 in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2013 primarily due to an increase in net sales from f-35 production contracts . operating profit is expected to increase slightly from 2013 , resulting in a slight decrease in operating margins between the years due to program mix . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions , and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence , and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in federal information technology budgets . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8367</td><td>$ 8846</td><td>$ 9381</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>759</td><td>808</td><td>874</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.3% ( 9.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>8300</td><td>8700</td><td>9300</td></tr></table> 2013 compared to 2012 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 479 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of about $ 495 million due to decreased volume on various programs ( command and control programs for classified customers , ngi , and eram programs ) ; and approximately $ 320 million due to the completion of certain programs ( such as total information processing support services , the transportation worker identification credential ( twic ) , and odin ) . the decrease was partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 340 million due to the start-up of certain programs ( such as the disa gsm-o and the national science foundation antarctic support ) . is&gs 2019 operating profit decreased $ 49 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 55 million due to certain programs nearing the end of their lifecycles , partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 15 million due to the start-up of certain programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were comparable for 2013 compared to 2012 compared to 2011 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2012 decreased $ 535 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 485 million due to the substantial completion of various programs during 2011 ( primarily jtrs ; odin ; and u.k . census ) ; and about $ 255 million due to lower volume on numerous other programs ( primarily hanford; .\nQuestion: what was the overall total decline in net sales?\nAnswer: 815.0\nQuestion: and what was the offsetting increase to that decline due to the start-up of certain programs?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "340.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: aeronautics 2019 operating profit for 2012 increased $ 69 million , or 4% ( 4 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $ 105 million from c-130 programs due to an increase in risk retirements ; about $ 50 million from f-16 programs due to higher aircraft deliveries partially offset by a decline in risk retirements ; approximately $ 50 million from f-35 production contracts due to increased production volume and risk retirements ; and about $ 50 million from the completion of purchased intangible asset amortization on certain f-16 contracts . partially offsetting the increases was lower operating profit of about $ 90 million from the f-35 development contract primarily due to the inception-to-date effect of reducing the profit booking rate in the second quarter of 2012 ; approximately $ 50 million from decreased production volume and risk retirements on the f-22 program partially offset by a resolution of a contractual matter in the second quarter of 2012 ; and approximately $ 45 million primarily due to a decrease in risk retirements on other sustainment activities partially offset by various other aeronautics programs due to increased risk retirements and volume . operating profit for c-5 programs was comparable to 2011 . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 30 million lower for 2012 compared to 2011 . backlog backlog decreased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to lower orders on f-16 , c-5 , and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on the f-35 program . backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to lower orders on f-35 and c-130 programs , partially offset by higher orders on f-16 programs . trends we expect aeronautics 2019 net sales to increase in 2014 in the mid-single digit percentage range as compared to 2013 primarily due to an increase in net sales from f-35 production contracts . operating profit is expected to increase slightly from 2013 , resulting in a slight decrease in operating margins between the years due to program mix . information systems & global solutions our is&gs business segment provides advanced technology systems and expertise , integrated information technology solutions , and management services across a broad spectrum of applications for civil , defense , intelligence , and other government customers . is&gs has a portfolio of many smaller contracts as compared to our other business segments . is&gs has been impacted by the continued downturn in federal information technology budgets . is&gs 2019 operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 8367</td><td>$ 8846</td><td>$ 9381</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>759</td><td>808</td><td>874</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>9.3% ( 9.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>8300</td><td>8700</td><td>9300</td></tr></table> 2013 compared to 2012 is&gs 2019 net sales decreased $ 479 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of about $ 495 million due to decreased volume on various programs ( command and control programs for classified customers , ngi , and eram programs ) ; and approximately $ 320 million due to the completion of certain programs ( such as total information processing support services , the transportation worker identification credential ( twic ) , and odin ) . the decrease was partially offset by higher net sales of about $ 340 million due to the start-up of certain programs ( such as the disa gsm-o and the national science foundation antarctic support ) . is&gs 2019 operating profit decreased $ 49 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , for 2013 compared to 2012 . the decrease was primarily attributable to lower operating profit of about $ 55 million due to certain programs nearing the end of their lifecycles , partially offset by higher operating profit of approximately $ 15 million due to the start-up of certain programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters , were comparable for 2013 compared to 2012 compared to 2011 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2012 decreased $ 535 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , compared to 2011 . the decrease was attributable to lower net sales of approximately $ 485 million due to the substantial completion of various programs during 2011 ( primarily jtrs ; odin ; and u.k . census ) ; and about $ 255 million due to lower volume on numerous other programs ( primarily hanford; .\nQuestion: what was the overall total decline in net sales?\nAnswer: 815.0\nQuestion: and what was the offsetting increase to that decline due to the start-up of certain programs?\nAnswer: 340.0\nQuestion: how much, then, does this offsetting increase represent in relation to that overall decline, in percentage?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.41718", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements long-term debt instruments the aggregate contractual principal amount of long-term other secured financings for which the fair value option was elected exceeded the related fair value by $ 361 million and $ 362 million as of december 2016 and december 2015 , respectively . the aggregate contractual principal amount of unsecured long-term borrowings for which the fair value option was elected exceeded the related fair value by $ 1.56 billion and $ 1.12 billion as of december 2016 and december 2015 , respectively . the amounts above include both principal- and non-principal-protected long-term borrowings . impact of credit spreads on loans and lending commitments the estimated net gain attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit spreads on loans and lending commitments for which the fair value option was elected was $ 281 million for 2016 , $ 751 million for 2015 and $ 1.83 billion for 2014 , respectively . the firm generally calculates the fair value of loans and lending commitments for which the fair value option is elected by discounting future cash flows at a rate which incorporates the instrument-specific credit spreads . for floating-rate loans and lending commitments , substantially all changes in fair value are attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit spreads , whereas for fixed-rate loans and lending commitments , changes in fair value are also attributable to changes in interest rates . debt valuation adjustment the firm calculates the fair value of financial liabilities for which the fair value option is elected by discounting future cash flows at a rate which incorporates the firm 2019s credit spreads . the net dva on such financial liabilities was a loss of $ 844 million ( $ 544 million , net of tax ) for 2016 and was included in 201cdebt valuation adjustment 201d in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income . the gains/ ( losses ) reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive loss upon extinguishment of such financial liabilities were not material for 2016 . note 9 . loans receivable loans receivable is comprised of loans held for investment that are accounted for at amortized cost net of allowance for loan losses . interest on loans receivable is recognized over the life of the loan and is recorded on an accrual basis . the table below presents details about loans receivable. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2016</td><td>as of december 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>corporate loans</td><td>$ 24837</td><td>$ 20740</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans to private wealth management clients</td><td>13828</td><td>13961</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loans backed by commercial real estate</td><td>4761</td><td>5271</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loans backed by residential real estate</td><td>3865</td><td>2316</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other loans</td><td>2890</td><td>3533</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total loans receivable gross</td><td>50181</td><td>45821</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>allowance for loan losses</td><td>-509 ( 509 )</td><td>-414 ( 414 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total loans receivable</td><td>$ 49672</td><td>$ 45407</td></tr></table> as of december 2016 and december 2015 , the fair value of loans receivable was $ 49.80 billion and $ 45.19 billion , respectively . as of december 2016 , had these loans been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 28.40 billion and $ 21.40 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . as of december 2015 , had these loans been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 23.91 billion and $ 21.28 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . the firm also extends lending commitments that are held for investment and accounted for on an accrual basis . as of december 2016 and december 2015 , such lending commitments were $ 98.05 billion and $ 93.92 billion , respectively . substantially all of these commitments were extended to corporate borrowers and were primarily related to the firm 2019s relationship lending activities . the carrying value and the estimated fair value of such lending commitments were liabilities of $ 327 million and $ 2.55 billion , respectively , as of december 2016 , and $ 291 million and $ 3.32 billion , respectively , as of december 2015 . as of december 2016 , had these lending commitments been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 1.10 billion and $ 1.45 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . as of december 2015 , had these lending commitments been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 1.35 billion and $ 1.97 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . goldman sachs 2016 form 10-k 147 .\nQuestion: as of 2016, what was the amount from the total loans receivable gross that was backed by commercial real estate?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "4761.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements long-term debt instruments the aggregate contractual principal amount of long-term other secured financings for which the fair value option was elected exceeded the related fair value by $ 361 million and $ 362 million as of december 2016 and december 2015 , respectively . the aggregate contractual principal amount of unsecured long-term borrowings for which the fair value option was elected exceeded the related fair value by $ 1.56 billion and $ 1.12 billion as of december 2016 and december 2015 , respectively . the amounts above include both principal- and non-principal-protected long-term borrowings . impact of credit spreads on loans and lending commitments the estimated net gain attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit spreads on loans and lending commitments for which the fair value option was elected was $ 281 million for 2016 , $ 751 million for 2015 and $ 1.83 billion for 2014 , respectively . the firm generally calculates the fair value of loans and lending commitments for which the fair value option is elected by discounting future cash flows at a rate which incorporates the instrument-specific credit spreads . for floating-rate loans and lending commitments , substantially all changes in fair value are attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit spreads , whereas for fixed-rate loans and lending commitments , changes in fair value are also attributable to changes in interest rates . debt valuation adjustment the firm calculates the fair value of financial liabilities for which the fair value option is elected by discounting future cash flows at a rate which incorporates the firm 2019s credit spreads . the net dva on such financial liabilities was a loss of $ 844 million ( $ 544 million , net of tax ) for 2016 and was included in 201cdebt valuation adjustment 201d in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income . the gains/ ( losses ) reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive loss upon extinguishment of such financial liabilities were not material for 2016 . note 9 . loans receivable loans receivable is comprised of loans held for investment that are accounted for at amortized cost net of allowance for loan losses . interest on loans receivable is recognized over the life of the loan and is recorded on an accrual basis . the table below presents details about loans receivable. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2016</td><td>as of december 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>corporate loans</td><td>$ 24837</td><td>$ 20740</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans to private wealth management clients</td><td>13828</td><td>13961</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loans backed by commercial real estate</td><td>4761</td><td>5271</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loans backed by residential real estate</td><td>3865</td><td>2316</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other loans</td><td>2890</td><td>3533</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total loans receivable gross</td><td>50181</td><td>45821</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>allowance for loan losses</td><td>-509 ( 509 )</td><td>-414 ( 414 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total loans receivable</td><td>$ 49672</td><td>$ 45407</td></tr></table> as of december 2016 and december 2015 , the fair value of loans receivable was $ 49.80 billion and $ 45.19 billion , respectively . as of december 2016 , had these loans been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 28.40 billion and $ 21.40 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . as of december 2015 , had these loans been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 23.91 billion and $ 21.28 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . the firm also extends lending commitments that are held for investment and accounted for on an accrual basis . as of december 2016 and december 2015 , such lending commitments were $ 98.05 billion and $ 93.92 billion , respectively . substantially all of these commitments were extended to corporate borrowers and were primarily related to the firm 2019s relationship lending activities . the carrying value and the estimated fair value of such lending commitments were liabilities of $ 327 million and $ 2.55 billion , respectively , as of december 2016 , and $ 291 million and $ 3.32 billion , respectively , as of december 2015 . as of december 2016 , had these lending commitments been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 1.10 billion and $ 1.45 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . as of december 2015 , had these lending commitments been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 1.35 billion and $ 1.97 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . goldman sachs 2016 form 10-k 147 .\nQuestion: as of 2016, what was the amount from the total loans receivable gross that was backed by commercial real estate?\nAnswer: 4761.0\nQuestion: and what was this total of loans receivable gross?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "50181.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements long-term debt instruments the aggregate contractual principal amount of long-term other secured financings for which the fair value option was elected exceeded the related fair value by $ 361 million and $ 362 million as of december 2016 and december 2015 , respectively . the aggregate contractual principal amount of unsecured long-term borrowings for which the fair value option was elected exceeded the related fair value by $ 1.56 billion and $ 1.12 billion as of december 2016 and december 2015 , respectively . the amounts above include both principal- and non-principal-protected long-term borrowings . impact of credit spreads on loans and lending commitments the estimated net gain attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit spreads on loans and lending commitments for which the fair value option was elected was $ 281 million for 2016 , $ 751 million for 2015 and $ 1.83 billion for 2014 , respectively . the firm generally calculates the fair value of loans and lending commitments for which the fair value option is elected by discounting future cash flows at a rate which incorporates the instrument-specific credit spreads . for floating-rate loans and lending commitments , substantially all changes in fair value are attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit spreads , whereas for fixed-rate loans and lending commitments , changes in fair value are also attributable to changes in interest rates . debt valuation adjustment the firm calculates the fair value of financial liabilities for which the fair value option is elected by discounting future cash flows at a rate which incorporates the firm 2019s credit spreads . the net dva on such financial liabilities was a loss of $ 844 million ( $ 544 million , net of tax ) for 2016 and was included in 201cdebt valuation adjustment 201d in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income . the gains/ ( losses ) reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive loss upon extinguishment of such financial liabilities were not material for 2016 . note 9 . loans receivable loans receivable is comprised of loans held for investment that are accounted for at amortized cost net of allowance for loan losses . interest on loans receivable is recognized over the life of the loan and is recorded on an accrual basis . the table below presents details about loans receivable. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2016</td><td>as of december 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>corporate loans</td><td>$ 24837</td><td>$ 20740</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans to private wealth management clients</td><td>13828</td><td>13961</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loans backed by commercial real estate</td><td>4761</td><td>5271</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loans backed by residential real estate</td><td>3865</td><td>2316</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other loans</td><td>2890</td><td>3533</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total loans receivable gross</td><td>50181</td><td>45821</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>allowance for loan losses</td><td>-509 ( 509 )</td><td>-414 ( 414 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total loans receivable</td><td>$ 49672</td><td>$ 45407</td></tr></table> as of december 2016 and december 2015 , the fair value of loans receivable was $ 49.80 billion and $ 45.19 billion , respectively . as of december 2016 , had these loans been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 28.40 billion and $ 21.40 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . as of december 2015 , had these loans been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 23.91 billion and $ 21.28 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . the firm also extends lending commitments that are held for investment and accounted for on an accrual basis . as of december 2016 and december 2015 , such lending commitments were $ 98.05 billion and $ 93.92 billion , respectively . substantially all of these commitments were extended to corporate borrowers and were primarily related to the firm 2019s relationship lending activities . the carrying value and the estimated fair value of such lending commitments were liabilities of $ 327 million and $ 2.55 billion , respectively , as of december 2016 , and $ 291 million and $ 3.32 billion , respectively , as of december 2015 . as of december 2016 , had these lending commitments been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 1.10 billion and $ 1.45 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . as of december 2015 , had these lending commitments been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 1.35 billion and $ 1.97 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . goldman sachs 2016 form 10-k 147 .\nQuestion: as of 2016, what was the amount from the total loans receivable gross that was backed by commercial real estate?\nAnswer: 4761.0\nQuestion: and what was this total of loans receivable gross?\nAnswer: 50181.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of this total did that amount represent?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.09488", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: the goldman sachs group , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements long-term debt instruments the aggregate contractual principal amount of long-term other secured financings for which the fair value option was elected exceeded the related fair value by $ 361 million and $ 362 million as of december 2016 and december 2015 , respectively . the aggregate contractual principal amount of unsecured long-term borrowings for which the fair value option was elected exceeded the related fair value by $ 1.56 billion and $ 1.12 billion as of december 2016 and december 2015 , respectively . the amounts above include both principal- and non-principal-protected long-term borrowings . impact of credit spreads on loans and lending commitments the estimated net gain attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit spreads on loans and lending commitments for which the fair value option was elected was $ 281 million for 2016 , $ 751 million for 2015 and $ 1.83 billion for 2014 , respectively . the firm generally calculates the fair value of loans and lending commitments for which the fair value option is elected by discounting future cash flows at a rate which incorporates the instrument-specific credit spreads . for floating-rate loans and lending commitments , substantially all changes in fair value are attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit spreads , whereas for fixed-rate loans and lending commitments , changes in fair value are also attributable to changes in interest rates . debt valuation adjustment the firm calculates the fair value of financial liabilities for which the fair value option is elected by discounting future cash flows at a rate which incorporates the firm 2019s credit spreads . the net dva on such financial liabilities was a loss of $ 844 million ( $ 544 million , net of tax ) for 2016 and was included in 201cdebt valuation adjustment 201d in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income . the gains/ ( losses ) reclassified to earnings from accumulated other comprehensive loss upon extinguishment of such financial liabilities were not material for 2016 . note 9 . loans receivable loans receivable is comprised of loans held for investment that are accounted for at amortized cost net of allowance for loan losses . interest on loans receivable is recognized over the life of the loan and is recorded on an accrual basis . the table below presents details about loans receivable. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2016</td><td>as of december 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>corporate loans</td><td>$ 24837</td><td>$ 20740</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>loans to private wealth management clients</td><td>13828</td><td>13961</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>loans backed by commercial real estate</td><td>4761</td><td>5271</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>loans backed by residential real estate</td><td>3865</td><td>2316</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other loans</td><td>2890</td><td>3533</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total loans receivable gross</td><td>50181</td><td>45821</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>allowance for loan losses</td><td>-509 ( 509 )</td><td>-414 ( 414 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total loans receivable</td><td>$ 49672</td><td>$ 45407</td></tr></table> as of december 2016 and december 2015 , the fair value of loans receivable was $ 49.80 billion and $ 45.19 billion , respectively . as of december 2016 , had these loans been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 28.40 billion and $ 21.40 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . as of december 2015 , had these loans been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 23.91 billion and $ 21.28 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . the firm also extends lending commitments that are held for investment and accounted for on an accrual basis . as of december 2016 and december 2015 , such lending commitments were $ 98.05 billion and $ 93.92 billion , respectively . substantially all of these commitments were extended to corporate borrowers and were primarily related to the firm 2019s relationship lending activities . the carrying value and the estimated fair value of such lending commitments were liabilities of $ 327 million and $ 2.55 billion , respectively , as of december 2016 , and $ 291 million and $ 3.32 billion , respectively , as of december 2015 . as of december 2016 , had these lending commitments been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 1.10 billion and $ 1.45 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . as of december 2015 , had these lending commitments been carried at fair value and included in the fair value hierarchy , $ 1.35 billion and $ 1.97 billion would have been classified in level 2 and level 3 , respectively . goldman sachs 2016 form 10-k 147 .\nQuestion: as of 2016, what was the amount from the total loans receivable gross that was backed by commercial real estate?\nAnswer: 4761.0\nQuestion: and what was this total of loans receivable gross?\nAnswer: 50181.0\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of this total did that amount represent?\nAnswer: 0.09488\nQuestion: and what was this same percentage representation for those values in 2015?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.11503", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: during 2015 , continued management actions , primarily the sale or transfer to held-for-sale of approximately $ 1.5 billion of delinquent residential first mortgages , including $ 0.9 billion in the fourth quarter largely associated with the transfer of citifinancial loans to held-for-sale referenced above , were the primary driver of the overall improvement in delinquencies within citi holdings 2019 residential first mortgage portfolio . credit performance from quarter to quarter could continue to be impacted by the amount of delinquent loan sales or transfers to held-for-sale , as well as overall trends in hpi and interest rates . north america residential first mortgages 2014state delinquency trends the following tables set forth the six u.s . states and/or regions with the highest concentration of citi 2019s residential first mortgages. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars state ( 1 )</td><td>in billions of dollars enr ( 2 )</td><td>in billions of dollars enrdistribution</td><td>in billions of dollars 90+dpd% ( 90+dpd % )</td><td>in billions of dollars %ltv >100% ( >100 % ) ( 3 )</td><td>in billions of dollars refreshedfico</td><td>in billions of dollars enr ( 2 )</td><td>in billions of dollars enrdistribution</td><td>in billions of dollars 90+dpd% ( 90+dpd % )</td><td>%ltv >100% ( >100 % ) ( 3 )</td><td>refreshedfico</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ca</td><td>$ 19.2</td><td>37% ( 37 % )</td><td>0.2% ( 0.2 % )</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td><td>754</td><td>$ 18.9</td><td>31% ( 31 % )</td><td>0.6% ( 0.6 % )</td><td>2% ( 2 % )</td><td>745</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>ny/nj/ct ( 4 )</td><td>12.7</td><td>25</td><td>0.8</td><td>1</td><td>751</td><td>12.2</td><td>20</td><td>1.9</td><td>2</td><td>740</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>va/md</td><td>2.2</td><td>4</td><td>1.2</td><td>2</td><td>719</td><td>3.0</td><td>5</td><td>3.0</td><td>8</td><td>695</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>il ( 4 )</td><td>2.2</td><td>4</td><td>1.0</td><td>3</td><td>735</td><td>2.5</td><td>4</td><td>2.5</td><td>9</td><td>713</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fl ( 4 )</td><td>2.2</td><td>4</td><td>1.1</td><td>4</td><td>723</td><td>2.8</td><td>5</td><td>3.0</td><td>14</td><td>700</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>tx</td><td>1.9</td><td>4</td><td>1.0</td><td>2014</td><td>711</td><td>2.5</td><td>4</td><td>2.7</td><td>2014</td><td>680</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>11.0</td><td>21</td><td>1.3</td><td>2</td><td>710</td><td>18.2</td><td>30</td><td>3.3</td><td>7</td><td>677</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total ( 5 )</td><td>$ 51.5</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>0.7% ( 0.7 % )</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td><td>738</td><td>$ 60.1</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>2.1% ( 2.1 % )</td><td>4% ( 4 % )</td><td>715</td></tr></table> total ( 5 ) $ 51.5 100% ( 100 % ) 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) 1% ( 1 % ) 738 $ 60.1 100% ( 100 % ) 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) 4% ( 4 % ) 715 note : totals may not sum due to rounding . ( 1 ) certain of the states are included as part of a region based on citi 2019s view of similar hpi within the region . ( 2 ) ending net receivables . excludes loans in canada and puerto rico , loans guaranteed by u.s . government agencies , loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to long term standby commitments ( ltscs ) . excludes balances for which fico or ltv data are unavailable . ( 3 ) ltv ratios ( loan balance divided by appraised value ) are calculated at origination and updated by applying market price data . ( 4 ) new york , new jersey , connecticut , florida and illinois are judicial states . ( 5 ) improvement in state trends during 2015 was primarily due to the sale or transfer to held-for-sale of residential first mortgages , including the transfer of citifinancial residential first mortgages to held-for-sale in the fourth quarter of 2015 . foreclosures a substantial majority of citi 2019s foreclosure inventory consists of residential first mortgages . at december 31 , 2015 , citi 2019s foreclosure inventory included approximately $ 0.1 billion , or 0.2% ( 0.2 % ) , of the total residential first mortgage portfolio , compared to $ 0.6 billion , or 0.9% ( 0.9 % ) , at december 31 , 2014 , based on the dollar amount of ending net receivables of loans in foreclosure inventory , excluding loans that are guaranteed by u.s . government agencies and loans subject to ltscs . north america consumer mortgage quarterly credit trends 2014net credit losses and delinquencies 2014home equity citi 2019s home equity loan portfolio consists of both fixed-rate home equity loans and loans extended under home equity lines of credit . fixed-rate home equity loans are fully amortizing . home equity lines of credit allow for amounts to be drawn for a period of time with the payment of interest only and then , at the end of the draw period , the then-outstanding amount is converted to an amortizing loan ( the interest-only payment feature during the revolving period is standard for this product across the industry ) . after conversion , the home equity loans typically have a 20-year amortization period . as of december 31 , 2015 , citi 2019s home equity loan portfolio of $ 22.8 billion consisted of $ 6.3 billion of fixed-rate home equity loans and $ 16.5 billion of loans extended under home equity lines of credit ( revolving helocs ) . .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2015, what was the amount of the loans extended under home equity lines of credit?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "16.5", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: during 2015 , continued management actions , primarily the sale or transfer to held-for-sale of approximately $ 1.5 billion of delinquent residential first mortgages , including $ 0.9 billion in the fourth quarter largely associated with the transfer of citifinancial loans to held-for-sale referenced above , were the primary driver of the overall improvement in delinquencies within citi holdings 2019 residential first mortgage portfolio . credit performance from quarter to quarter could continue to be impacted by the amount of delinquent loan sales or transfers to held-for-sale , as well as overall trends in hpi and interest rates . north america residential first mortgages 2014state delinquency trends the following tables set forth the six u.s . states and/or regions with the highest concentration of citi 2019s residential first mortgages. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars state ( 1 )</td><td>in billions of dollars enr ( 2 )</td><td>in billions of dollars enrdistribution</td><td>in billions of dollars 90+dpd% ( 90+dpd % )</td><td>in billions of dollars %ltv >100% ( >100 % ) ( 3 )</td><td>in billions of dollars refreshedfico</td><td>in billions of dollars enr ( 2 )</td><td>in billions of dollars enrdistribution</td><td>in billions of dollars 90+dpd% ( 90+dpd % )</td><td>%ltv >100% ( >100 % ) ( 3 )</td><td>refreshedfico</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ca</td><td>$ 19.2</td><td>37% ( 37 % )</td><td>0.2% ( 0.2 % )</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td><td>754</td><td>$ 18.9</td><td>31% ( 31 % )</td><td>0.6% ( 0.6 % )</td><td>2% ( 2 % )</td><td>745</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>ny/nj/ct ( 4 )</td><td>12.7</td><td>25</td><td>0.8</td><td>1</td><td>751</td><td>12.2</td><td>20</td><td>1.9</td><td>2</td><td>740</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>va/md</td><td>2.2</td><td>4</td><td>1.2</td><td>2</td><td>719</td><td>3.0</td><td>5</td><td>3.0</td><td>8</td><td>695</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>il ( 4 )</td><td>2.2</td><td>4</td><td>1.0</td><td>3</td><td>735</td><td>2.5</td><td>4</td><td>2.5</td><td>9</td><td>713</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fl ( 4 )</td><td>2.2</td><td>4</td><td>1.1</td><td>4</td><td>723</td><td>2.8</td><td>5</td><td>3.0</td><td>14</td><td>700</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>tx</td><td>1.9</td><td>4</td><td>1.0</td><td>2014</td><td>711</td><td>2.5</td><td>4</td><td>2.7</td><td>2014</td><td>680</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>11.0</td><td>21</td><td>1.3</td><td>2</td><td>710</td><td>18.2</td><td>30</td><td>3.3</td><td>7</td><td>677</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total ( 5 )</td><td>$ 51.5</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>0.7% ( 0.7 % )</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td><td>738</td><td>$ 60.1</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>2.1% ( 2.1 % )</td><td>4% ( 4 % )</td><td>715</td></tr></table> total ( 5 ) $ 51.5 100% ( 100 % ) 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) 1% ( 1 % ) 738 $ 60.1 100% ( 100 % ) 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) 4% ( 4 % ) 715 note : totals may not sum due to rounding . ( 1 ) certain of the states are included as part of a region based on citi 2019s view of similar hpi within the region . ( 2 ) ending net receivables . excludes loans in canada and puerto rico , loans guaranteed by u.s . government agencies , loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to long term standby commitments ( ltscs ) . excludes balances for which fico or ltv data are unavailable . ( 3 ) ltv ratios ( loan balance divided by appraised value ) are calculated at origination and updated by applying market price data . ( 4 ) new york , new jersey , connecticut , florida and illinois are judicial states . ( 5 ) improvement in state trends during 2015 was primarily due to the sale or transfer to held-for-sale of residential first mortgages , including the transfer of citifinancial residential first mortgages to held-for-sale in the fourth quarter of 2015 . foreclosures a substantial majority of citi 2019s foreclosure inventory consists of residential first mortgages . at december 31 , 2015 , citi 2019s foreclosure inventory included approximately $ 0.1 billion , or 0.2% ( 0.2 % ) , of the total residential first mortgage portfolio , compared to $ 0.6 billion , or 0.9% ( 0.9 % ) , at december 31 , 2014 , based on the dollar amount of ending net receivables of loans in foreclosure inventory , excluding loans that are guaranteed by u.s . government agencies and loans subject to ltscs . north america consumer mortgage quarterly credit trends 2014net credit losses and delinquencies 2014home equity citi 2019s home equity loan portfolio consists of both fixed-rate home equity loans and loans extended under home equity lines of credit . fixed-rate home equity loans are fully amortizing . home equity lines of credit allow for amounts to be drawn for a period of time with the payment of interest only and then , at the end of the draw period , the then-outstanding amount is converted to an amortizing loan ( the interest-only payment feature during the revolving period is standard for this product across the industry ) . after conversion , the home equity loans typically have a 20-year amortization period . as of december 31 , 2015 , citi 2019s home equity loan portfolio of $ 22.8 billion consisted of $ 6.3 billion of fixed-rate home equity loans and $ 16.5 billion of loans extended under home equity lines of credit ( revolving helocs ) . .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2015, what was the amount of the loans extended under home equity lines of credit?\nAnswer: 16.5\nQuestion: and what was the total citi 2019s home equity loan portfolio?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "22.8", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: during 2015 , continued management actions , primarily the sale or transfer to held-for-sale of approximately $ 1.5 billion of delinquent residential first mortgages , including $ 0.9 billion in the fourth quarter largely associated with the transfer of citifinancial loans to held-for-sale referenced above , were the primary driver of the overall improvement in delinquencies within citi holdings 2019 residential first mortgage portfolio . credit performance from quarter to quarter could continue to be impacted by the amount of delinquent loan sales or transfers to held-for-sale , as well as overall trends in hpi and interest rates . north america residential first mortgages 2014state delinquency trends the following tables set forth the six u.s . states and/or regions with the highest concentration of citi 2019s residential first mortgages. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars state ( 1 )</td><td>in billions of dollars enr ( 2 )</td><td>in billions of dollars enrdistribution</td><td>in billions of dollars 90+dpd% ( 90+dpd % )</td><td>in billions of dollars %ltv >100% ( >100 % ) ( 3 )</td><td>in billions of dollars refreshedfico</td><td>in billions of dollars enr ( 2 )</td><td>in billions of dollars enrdistribution</td><td>in billions of dollars 90+dpd% ( 90+dpd % )</td><td>%ltv >100% ( >100 % ) ( 3 )</td><td>refreshedfico</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ca</td><td>$ 19.2</td><td>37% ( 37 % )</td><td>0.2% ( 0.2 % )</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td><td>754</td><td>$ 18.9</td><td>31% ( 31 % )</td><td>0.6% ( 0.6 % )</td><td>2% ( 2 % )</td><td>745</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>ny/nj/ct ( 4 )</td><td>12.7</td><td>25</td><td>0.8</td><td>1</td><td>751</td><td>12.2</td><td>20</td><td>1.9</td><td>2</td><td>740</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>va/md</td><td>2.2</td><td>4</td><td>1.2</td><td>2</td><td>719</td><td>3.0</td><td>5</td><td>3.0</td><td>8</td><td>695</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>il ( 4 )</td><td>2.2</td><td>4</td><td>1.0</td><td>3</td><td>735</td><td>2.5</td><td>4</td><td>2.5</td><td>9</td><td>713</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fl ( 4 )</td><td>2.2</td><td>4</td><td>1.1</td><td>4</td><td>723</td><td>2.8</td><td>5</td><td>3.0</td><td>14</td><td>700</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>tx</td><td>1.9</td><td>4</td><td>1.0</td><td>2014</td><td>711</td><td>2.5</td><td>4</td><td>2.7</td><td>2014</td><td>680</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>11.0</td><td>21</td><td>1.3</td><td>2</td><td>710</td><td>18.2</td><td>30</td><td>3.3</td><td>7</td><td>677</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total ( 5 )</td><td>$ 51.5</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>0.7% ( 0.7 % )</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td><td>738</td><td>$ 60.1</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>2.1% ( 2.1 % )</td><td>4% ( 4 % )</td><td>715</td></tr></table> total ( 5 ) $ 51.5 100% ( 100 % ) 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) 1% ( 1 % ) 738 $ 60.1 100% ( 100 % ) 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) 4% ( 4 % ) 715 note : totals may not sum due to rounding . ( 1 ) certain of the states are included as part of a region based on citi 2019s view of similar hpi within the region . ( 2 ) ending net receivables . excludes loans in canada and puerto rico , loans guaranteed by u.s . government agencies , loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to long term standby commitments ( ltscs ) . excludes balances for which fico or ltv data are unavailable . ( 3 ) ltv ratios ( loan balance divided by appraised value ) are calculated at origination and updated by applying market price data . ( 4 ) new york , new jersey , connecticut , florida and illinois are judicial states . ( 5 ) improvement in state trends during 2015 was primarily due to the sale or transfer to held-for-sale of residential first mortgages , including the transfer of citifinancial residential first mortgages to held-for-sale in the fourth quarter of 2015 . foreclosures a substantial majority of citi 2019s foreclosure inventory consists of residential first mortgages . at december 31 , 2015 , citi 2019s foreclosure inventory included approximately $ 0.1 billion , or 0.2% ( 0.2 % ) , of the total residential first mortgage portfolio , compared to $ 0.6 billion , or 0.9% ( 0.9 % ) , at december 31 , 2014 , based on the dollar amount of ending net receivables of loans in foreclosure inventory , excluding loans that are guaranteed by u.s . government agencies and loans subject to ltscs . north america consumer mortgage quarterly credit trends 2014net credit losses and delinquencies 2014home equity citi 2019s home equity loan portfolio consists of both fixed-rate home equity loans and loans extended under home equity lines of credit . fixed-rate home equity loans are fully amortizing . home equity lines of credit allow for amounts to be drawn for a period of time with the payment of interest only and then , at the end of the draw period , the then-outstanding amount is converted to an amortizing loan ( the interest-only payment feature during the revolving period is standard for this product across the industry ) . after conversion , the home equity loans typically have a 20-year amortization period . as of december 31 , 2015 , citi 2019s home equity loan portfolio of $ 22.8 billion consisted of $ 6.3 billion of fixed-rate home equity loans and $ 16.5 billion of loans extended under home equity lines of credit ( revolving helocs ) . .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2015, what was the amount of the loans extended under home equity lines of credit?\nAnswer: 16.5\nQuestion: and what was the total citi 2019s home equity loan portfolio?\nAnswer: 22.8\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of this total does that amount represent?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.72368", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: during 2015 , continued management actions , primarily the sale or transfer to held-for-sale of approximately $ 1.5 billion of delinquent residential first mortgages , including $ 0.9 billion in the fourth quarter largely associated with the transfer of citifinancial loans to held-for-sale referenced above , were the primary driver of the overall improvement in delinquencies within citi holdings 2019 residential first mortgage portfolio . credit performance from quarter to quarter could continue to be impacted by the amount of delinquent loan sales or transfers to held-for-sale , as well as overall trends in hpi and interest rates . north america residential first mortgages 2014state delinquency trends the following tables set forth the six u.s . states and/or regions with the highest concentration of citi 2019s residential first mortgages. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars state ( 1 )</td><td>in billions of dollars enr ( 2 )</td><td>in billions of dollars enrdistribution</td><td>in billions of dollars 90+dpd% ( 90+dpd % )</td><td>in billions of dollars %ltv >100% ( >100 % ) ( 3 )</td><td>in billions of dollars refreshedfico</td><td>in billions of dollars enr ( 2 )</td><td>in billions of dollars enrdistribution</td><td>in billions of dollars 90+dpd% ( 90+dpd % )</td><td>%ltv >100% ( >100 % ) ( 3 )</td><td>refreshedfico</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ca</td><td>$ 19.2</td><td>37% ( 37 % )</td><td>0.2% ( 0.2 % )</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td><td>754</td><td>$ 18.9</td><td>31% ( 31 % )</td><td>0.6% ( 0.6 % )</td><td>2% ( 2 % )</td><td>745</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>ny/nj/ct ( 4 )</td><td>12.7</td><td>25</td><td>0.8</td><td>1</td><td>751</td><td>12.2</td><td>20</td><td>1.9</td><td>2</td><td>740</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>va/md</td><td>2.2</td><td>4</td><td>1.2</td><td>2</td><td>719</td><td>3.0</td><td>5</td><td>3.0</td><td>8</td><td>695</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>il ( 4 )</td><td>2.2</td><td>4</td><td>1.0</td><td>3</td><td>735</td><td>2.5</td><td>4</td><td>2.5</td><td>9</td><td>713</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fl ( 4 )</td><td>2.2</td><td>4</td><td>1.1</td><td>4</td><td>723</td><td>2.8</td><td>5</td><td>3.0</td><td>14</td><td>700</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>tx</td><td>1.9</td><td>4</td><td>1.0</td><td>2014</td><td>711</td><td>2.5</td><td>4</td><td>2.7</td><td>2014</td><td>680</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>other</td><td>11.0</td><td>21</td><td>1.3</td><td>2</td><td>710</td><td>18.2</td><td>30</td><td>3.3</td><td>7</td><td>677</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total ( 5 )</td><td>$ 51.5</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>0.7% ( 0.7 % )</td><td>1% ( 1 % )</td><td>738</td><td>$ 60.1</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>2.1% ( 2.1 % )</td><td>4% ( 4 % )</td><td>715</td></tr></table> total ( 5 ) $ 51.5 100% ( 100 % ) 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) 1% ( 1 % ) 738 $ 60.1 100% ( 100 % ) 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) 4% ( 4 % ) 715 note : totals may not sum due to rounding . ( 1 ) certain of the states are included as part of a region based on citi 2019s view of similar hpi within the region . ( 2 ) ending net receivables . excludes loans in canada and puerto rico , loans guaranteed by u.s . government agencies , loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to long term standby commitments ( ltscs ) . excludes balances for which fico or ltv data are unavailable . ( 3 ) ltv ratios ( loan balance divided by appraised value ) are calculated at origination and updated by applying market price data . ( 4 ) new york , new jersey , connecticut , florida and illinois are judicial states . ( 5 ) improvement in state trends during 2015 was primarily due to the sale or transfer to held-for-sale of residential first mortgages , including the transfer of citifinancial residential first mortgages to held-for-sale in the fourth quarter of 2015 . foreclosures a substantial majority of citi 2019s foreclosure inventory consists of residential first mortgages . at december 31 , 2015 , citi 2019s foreclosure inventory included approximately $ 0.1 billion , or 0.2% ( 0.2 % ) , of the total residential first mortgage portfolio , compared to $ 0.6 billion , or 0.9% ( 0.9 % ) , at december 31 , 2014 , based on the dollar amount of ending net receivables of loans in foreclosure inventory , excluding loans that are guaranteed by u.s . government agencies and loans subject to ltscs . north america consumer mortgage quarterly credit trends 2014net credit losses and delinquencies 2014home equity citi 2019s home equity loan portfolio consists of both fixed-rate home equity loans and loans extended under home equity lines of credit . fixed-rate home equity loans are fully amortizing . home equity lines of credit allow for amounts to be drawn for a period of time with the payment of interest only and then , at the end of the draw period , the then-outstanding amount is converted to an amortizing loan ( the interest-only payment feature during the revolving period is standard for this product across the industry ) . after conversion , the home equity loans typically have a 20-year amortization period . as of december 31 , 2015 , citi 2019s home equity loan portfolio of $ 22.8 billion consisted of $ 6.3 billion of fixed-rate home equity loans and $ 16.5 billion of loans extended under home equity lines of credit ( revolving helocs ) . .\nQuestion: as of december 31, 2015, what was the amount of the loans extended under home equity lines of credit?\nAnswer: 16.5\nQuestion: and what was the total citi 2019s home equity loan portfolio?\nAnswer: 22.8\nQuestion: what percentage, then, of this total does that amount represent?\nAnswer: 0.72368\nQuestion: and what percentage did the fixed-rate home equity loans represent?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.27632", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 114 million in gross wholesale revenue due to an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales and an increase in sales to affiliated customers ; an increase of $ 106.1 million in production cost allocation rider revenues which became effective in july 2007 as a result of the system agreement proceedings . as a result of the system agreement proceedings , entergy arkansas also has a corresponding increase in deferred fuel expense for payments to other entergy system companies such that there is no effect on net income . entergy arkansas makes payments over a seven-month period but collections from customers occur over a twelve-month period . the production cost allocation rider is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements and the system agreement proceedings are referenced below under \"federal regulation\" ; and an increase of $ 58.9 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to changes in the energy cost recovery rider effective april 2008 and september 2008 , partially offset by decreased usage . the energy cost recovery rider filings are discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 14.6 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase of $ 106.1 million in deferred system agreement payments , as discussed above and an increase in the average market price of purchased power . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 1074.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>13.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>11.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>deferred fuel costs revisions</td><td>8.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>2.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 1110.6</td></tr></table> the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower wholesale revenues in the third quarter 2006 due to an october 2006 ferc order requiring entergy arkansas to make a refund to a coal plant co-owner resulting from a contract dispute , in addition to re-pricing revisions , retroactive to 2003 , of $ 5.9 million of purchased power agreements among entergy system companies as directed by the ferc . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the deferred fuel cost revisions variance is primarily due to the 2006 energy cost recovery true-up , made in the first quarter 2007 , which increased net revenue by $ 6.6 million . gross operating revenue and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $ 173.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to a decrease in the energy cost recovery rider effective april 2007 . the energy cost recovery rider is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the decrease was partially offset by production cost allocation rider revenues of $ 124.1 million that became effective in july 2007 as a result of the system agreement proceedings . as .\nQuestion: what is the change in revenue from 2006 to 2007?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "36.1", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 114 million in gross wholesale revenue due to an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales and an increase in sales to affiliated customers ; an increase of $ 106.1 million in production cost allocation rider revenues which became effective in july 2007 as a result of the system agreement proceedings . as a result of the system agreement proceedings , entergy arkansas also has a corresponding increase in deferred fuel expense for payments to other entergy system companies such that there is no effect on net income . entergy arkansas makes payments over a seven-month period but collections from customers occur over a twelve-month period . the production cost allocation rider is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements and the system agreement proceedings are referenced below under \"federal regulation\" ; and an increase of $ 58.9 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to changes in the energy cost recovery rider effective april 2008 and september 2008 , partially offset by decreased usage . the energy cost recovery rider filings are discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 14.6 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase of $ 106.1 million in deferred system agreement payments , as discussed above and an increase in the average market price of purchased power . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 1074.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>13.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>11.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>deferred fuel costs revisions</td><td>8.6</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>2.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 1110.6</td></tr></table> the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower wholesale revenues in the third quarter 2006 due to an october 2006 ferc order requiring entergy arkansas to make a refund to a coal plant co-owner resulting from a contract dispute , in addition to re-pricing revisions , retroactive to 2003 , of $ 5.9 million of purchased power agreements among entergy system companies as directed by the ferc . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the deferred fuel cost revisions variance is primarily due to the 2006 energy cost recovery true-up , made in the first quarter 2007 , which increased net revenue by $ 6.6 million . gross operating revenue and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $ 173.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to a decrease in the energy cost recovery rider effective april 2007 . the energy cost recovery rider is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the decrease was partially offset by production cost allocation rider revenues of $ 124.1 million that became effective in july 2007 as a result of the system agreement proceedings . as .\nQuestion: what is the change in revenue from 2006 to 2007?\nAnswer: 36.1\nQuestion: what growth rate does this represent?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.0336", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , our liabilities associated with unrecognized tax benefits are not material . we and our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and various foreign jurisdictions . with few exceptions , the statute of limitations is no longer open for u.s . federal or non-u.s . income tax examinations for the years before 2011 , other than with respect to refunds . u.s . income taxes and foreign withholding taxes have not been provided on earnings of $ 291 million , $ 222 million and $ 211 million that have not been distributed by our non-u.s . companies as of december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 . our intention is to permanently reinvest these earnings , thereby indefinitely postponing their remittance to the u.s . if these earnings had been remitted , we estimate that the additional income taxes after foreign tax credits would have been approximately $ 55 million in 2014 , $ 50 million in 2013 and $ 45 million in 2012 . our federal and foreign income tax payments , net of refunds received , were $ 1.5 billion in 2014 , $ 787 million in 2013 and $ 890 million in 2012 . our 2014 and 2013 net payments reflect a $ 200 million and $ 550 million refund from the irs primarily attributable to our tax-deductible discretionary pension contributions during the fourth quarters of 2013 and 2012 , and our 2012 net payments reflect a $ 153 million refund from the irs related to a 2011 capital loss carryback . note 8 2013 debt our long-term debt consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes with rates from 2.13% ( 2.13 % ) to 6.15% ( 6.15 % ) due 2016 to 2042</td><td>$ 5642</td><td>$ 5642</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>notes with rates from 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) to 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) due 2016 to 2036</td><td>916</td><td>916</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other debt</td><td>483</td><td>476</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>7041</td><td>7034</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less : unamortized discounts</td><td>-872 ( 872 )</td><td>-882 ( 882 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt net</td><td>$ 6169</td><td>$ 6152</td></tr></table> in august 2014 , we entered into a new $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks and concurrently terminated our existing $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility which was scheduled to expire in august 2016 . the new credit facility expires august 2019 and we may request and the banks may grant , at their discretion , an increase to the new credit facility of up to an additional $ 500 million . the credit facility also includes a sublimit of up to $ 300 million available for the issuance of letters of credit . there were no borrowings outstanding under the new facility through december 31 , 2014 . borrowings under the new credit facility would be unsecured and bear interest at rates based , at our option , on a eurodollar rate or a base rate , as defined in the new credit facility . each bank 2019s obligation to make loans under the credit facility is subject to , among other things , our compliance with various representations , warranties and covenants , including covenants limiting our ability and certain of our subsidiaries 2019 ability to encumber assets and a covenant not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio , as defined in the credit facility . the leverage ratio covenant excludes the adjustments recognized in stockholders 2019 equity related to postretirement benefit plans . as of december 31 , 2014 , we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the credit facility , as well as in our debt agreements . we have agreements in place with financial institutions to provide for the issuance of commercial paper . there were no commercial paper borrowings outstanding during 2014 or 2013 . if we were to issue commercial paper , the borrowings would be supported by the credit facility . in april 2013 , we repaid $ 150 million of long-term notes with a fixed interest rate of 7.38% ( 7.38 % ) due to their scheduled maturities . during the next five years , we have scheduled long-term debt maturities of $ 952 million due in 2016 and $ 900 million due in 2019 . interest payments were $ 326 million in 2014 , $ 340 million in 2013 and $ 378 million in 2012 . all of our existing unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness rank equally in right of payment . note 9 2013 postretirement plans defined benefit pension plans and retiree medical and life insurance plans many of our employees are covered by qualified defined benefit pension plans and we provide certain health care and life insurance benefits to eligible retirees ( collectively , postretirement benefit plans ) . we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit pension plans to provide for benefits in excess of qualified plan limits . non-union represented employees hired after december 2005 do not participate in our qualified defined benefit pension plans , but are eligible to participate in a qualified .\nQuestion: what is the change in the balance of net total long-term debt from 2013 to 2014?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "17.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: as of december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , our liabilities associated with unrecognized tax benefits are not material . we and our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and various foreign jurisdictions . with few exceptions , the statute of limitations is no longer open for u.s . federal or non-u.s . income tax examinations for the years before 2011 , other than with respect to refunds . u.s . income taxes and foreign withholding taxes have not been provided on earnings of $ 291 million , $ 222 million and $ 211 million that have not been distributed by our non-u.s . companies as of december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 . our intention is to permanently reinvest these earnings , thereby indefinitely postponing their remittance to the u.s . if these earnings had been remitted , we estimate that the additional income taxes after foreign tax credits would have been approximately $ 55 million in 2014 , $ 50 million in 2013 and $ 45 million in 2012 . our federal and foreign income tax payments , net of refunds received , were $ 1.5 billion in 2014 , $ 787 million in 2013 and $ 890 million in 2012 . our 2014 and 2013 net payments reflect a $ 200 million and $ 550 million refund from the irs primarily attributable to our tax-deductible discretionary pension contributions during the fourth quarters of 2013 and 2012 , and our 2012 net payments reflect a $ 153 million refund from the irs related to a 2011 capital loss carryback . note 8 2013 debt our long-term debt consisted of the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>notes with rates from 2.13% ( 2.13 % ) to 6.15% ( 6.15 % ) due 2016 to 2042</td><td>$ 5642</td><td>$ 5642</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>notes with rates from 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) to 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) due 2016 to 2036</td><td>916</td><td>916</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other debt</td><td>483</td><td>476</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total long-term debt</td><td>7041</td><td>7034</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less : unamortized discounts</td><td>-872 ( 872 )</td><td>-882 ( 882 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total long-term debt net</td><td>$ 6169</td><td>$ 6152</td></tr></table> in august 2014 , we entered into a new $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks and concurrently terminated our existing $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility which was scheduled to expire in august 2016 . the new credit facility expires august 2019 and we may request and the banks may grant , at their discretion , an increase to the new credit facility of up to an additional $ 500 million . the credit facility also includes a sublimit of up to $ 300 million available for the issuance of letters of credit . there were no borrowings outstanding under the new facility through december 31 , 2014 . borrowings under the new credit facility would be unsecured and bear interest at rates based , at our option , on a eurodollar rate or a base rate , as defined in the new credit facility . each bank 2019s obligation to make loans under the credit facility is subject to , among other things , our compliance with various representations , warranties and covenants , including covenants limiting our ability and certain of our subsidiaries 2019 ability to encumber assets and a covenant not to exceed a maximum leverage ratio , as defined in the credit facility . the leverage ratio covenant excludes the adjustments recognized in stockholders 2019 equity related to postretirement benefit plans . as of december 31 , 2014 , we were in compliance with all covenants contained in the credit facility , as well as in our debt agreements . we have agreements in place with financial institutions to provide for the issuance of commercial paper . there were no commercial paper borrowings outstanding during 2014 or 2013 . if we were to issue commercial paper , the borrowings would be supported by the credit facility . in april 2013 , we repaid $ 150 million of long-term notes with a fixed interest rate of 7.38% ( 7.38 % ) due to their scheduled maturities . during the next five years , we have scheduled long-term debt maturities of $ 952 million due in 2016 and $ 900 million due in 2019 . interest payments were $ 326 million in 2014 , $ 340 million in 2013 and $ 378 million in 2012 . all of our existing unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness rank equally in right of payment . note 9 2013 postretirement plans defined benefit pension plans and retiree medical and life insurance plans many of our employees are covered by qualified defined benefit pension plans and we provide certain health care and life insurance benefits to eligible retirees ( collectively , postretirement benefit plans ) . we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit pension plans to provide for benefits in excess of qualified plan limits . non-union represented employees hired after december 2005 do not participate in our qualified defined benefit pension plans , but are eligible to participate in a qualified .\nQuestion: what is the change in the balance of net total long-term debt from 2013 to 2014?\nAnswer: 17.0\nQuestion: what is the average balance for these years?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "8.5", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: part i berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 34000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the north american cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . europe in europe , cruising represents a smaller but growing sector of the vacation industry . it has experienced a compound annual growth rate in cruise guests of approximately 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) from 2007 to 2011 and we believe this market has significant continued growth poten- tial . we estimate that europe was served by 104 ships with approximately 100000 berths at the beginning of 2007 and by 121 ships with approximately 155000 berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 28000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the european cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . the following table details the growth in the global , north american and european cruise markets in terms of cruise guests and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : global cruise guests ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>global cruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>weighted-averagesupplyofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>northamericancruiseguests ( 2 )</td><td>weighted-average supply ofberths marketedin northamerica ( 1 )</td><td>europeancruiseguests</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketed ineurope ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>16586000</td><td>327000</td><td>10247000</td><td>212000</td><td>4080000</td><td>105000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>17184000</td><td>347000</td><td>10093000</td><td>219000</td><td>4500000</td><td>120000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>17340000</td><td>363000</td><td>10198000</td><td>222000</td><td>5000000</td><td>131000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>18800000</td><td>391000</td><td>10781000</td><td>232000</td><td>5540000</td><td>143000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>20227000</td><td>412000</td><td>11625000</td><td>245000</td><td>5894000</td><td>149000</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally , in north america and europe are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . ( 3 ) source : european cruise council for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe as discussed above , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . we compete with a number of cruise lines ; however , our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consum- ers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influ- enced by political and general economic conditions . companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , order to enhance our revenues while continuing to expand and diversify our guest mix through interna- tional guest sourcing , and ensure adequate cash and liquidity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , our brands throughout the world , revitalization of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while expanding our fleet with the new state-of-the-art cruise ships recently delivered and on order , by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , support ongoing operations and initiatives , and the principal industry distribution channel , while enhancing our consumer outreach programs. .\nQuestion: what was the number of global cruise guests in 2011?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "20227000.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: part i berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 34000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the north american cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . europe in europe , cruising represents a smaller but growing sector of the vacation industry . it has experienced a compound annual growth rate in cruise guests of approximately 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) from 2007 to 2011 and we believe this market has significant continued growth poten- tial . we estimate that europe was served by 104 ships with approximately 100000 berths at the beginning of 2007 and by 121 ships with approximately 155000 berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 28000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the european cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . the following table details the growth in the global , north american and european cruise markets in terms of cruise guests and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : global cruise guests ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>global cruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>weighted-averagesupplyofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>northamericancruiseguests ( 2 )</td><td>weighted-average supply ofberths marketedin northamerica ( 1 )</td><td>europeancruiseguests</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketed ineurope ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>16586000</td><td>327000</td><td>10247000</td><td>212000</td><td>4080000</td><td>105000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>17184000</td><td>347000</td><td>10093000</td><td>219000</td><td>4500000</td><td>120000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>17340000</td><td>363000</td><td>10198000</td><td>222000</td><td>5000000</td><td>131000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>18800000</td><td>391000</td><td>10781000</td><td>232000</td><td>5540000</td><td>143000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>20227000</td><td>412000</td><td>11625000</td><td>245000</td><td>5894000</td><td>149000</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally , in north america and europe are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . ( 3 ) source : european cruise council for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe as discussed above , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . we compete with a number of cruise lines ; however , our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consum- ers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influ- enced by political and general economic conditions . companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , order to enhance our revenues while continuing to expand and diversify our guest mix through interna- tional guest sourcing , and ensure adequate cash and liquidity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , our brands throughout the world , revitalization of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while expanding our fleet with the new state-of-the-art cruise ships recently delivered and on order , by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , support ongoing operations and initiatives , and the principal industry distribution channel , while enhancing our consumer outreach programs. .\nQuestion: what was the number of global cruise guests in 2011?\nAnswer: 20227000.0\nQuestion: and in 2007?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "16586000.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: part i berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 34000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the north american cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . europe in europe , cruising represents a smaller but growing sector of the vacation industry . it has experienced a compound annual growth rate in cruise guests of approximately 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) from 2007 to 2011 and we believe this market has significant continued growth poten- tial . we estimate that europe was served by 104 ships with approximately 100000 berths at the beginning of 2007 and by 121 ships with approximately 155000 berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 28000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the european cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . the following table details the growth in the global , north american and european cruise markets in terms of cruise guests and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : global cruise guests ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>global cruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>weighted-averagesupplyofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>northamericancruiseguests ( 2 )</td><td>weighted-average supply ofberths marketedin northamerica ( 1 )</td><td>europeancruiseguests</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketed ineurope ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>16586000</td><td>327000</td><td>10247000</td><td>212000</td><td>4080000</td><td>105000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>17184000</td><td>347000</td><td>10093000</td><td>219000</td><td>4500000</td><td>120000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>17340000</td><td>363000</td><td>10198000</td><td>222000</td><td>5000000</td><td>131000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>18800000</td><td>391000</td><td>10781000</td><td>232000</td><td>5540000</td><td>143000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>20227000</td><td>412000</td><td>11625000</td><td>245000</td><td>5894000</td><td>149000</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally , in north america and europe are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . ( 3 ) source : european cruise council for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe as discussed above , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . we compete with a number of cruise lines ; however , our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consum- ers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influ- enced by political and general economic conditions . companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , order to enhance our revenues while continuing to expand and diversify our guest mix through interna- tional guest sourcing , and ensure adequate cash and liquidity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , our brands throughout the world , revitalization of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while expanding our fleet with the new state-of-the-art cruise ships recently delivered and on order , by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , support ongoing operations and initiatives , and the principal industry distribution channel , while enhancing our consumer outreach programs. .\nQuestion: what was the number of global cruise guests in 2011?\nAnswer: 20227000.0\nQuestion: and in 2007?\nAnswer: 16586000.0\nQuestion: so by how much did this value change between these years?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "3641000.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: part i berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 34000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the north american cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . europe in europe , cruising represents a smaller but growing sector of the vacation industry . it has experienced a compound annual growth rate in cruise guests of approximately 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) from 2007 to 2011 and we believe this market has significant continued growth poten- tial . we estimate that europe was served by 104 ships with approximately 100000 berths at the beginning of 2007 and by 121 ships with approximately 155000 berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 28000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the european cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . the following table details the growth in the global , north american and european cruise markets in terms of cruise guests and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : global cruise guests ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>global cruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>weighted-averagesupplyofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>northamericancruiseguests ( 2 )</td><td>weighted-average supply ofberths marketedin northamerica ( 1 )</td><td>europeancruiseguests</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketed ineurope ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>16586000</td><td>327000</td><td>10247000</td><td>212000</td><td>4080000</td><td>105000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>17184000</td><td>347000</td><td>10093000</td><td>219000</td><td>4500000</td><td>120000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>17340000</td><td>363000</td><td>10198000</td><td>222000</td><td>5000000</td><td>131000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>18800000</td><td>391000</td><td>10781000</td><td>232000</td><td>5540000</td><td>143000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>20227000</td><td>412000</td><td>11625000</td><td>245000</td><td>5894000</td><td>149000</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally , in north america and europe are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . ( 3 ) source : european cruise council for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe as discussed above , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . we compete with a number of cruise lines ; however , our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consum- ers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influ- enced by political and general economic conditions . companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , order to enhance our revenues while continuing to expand and diversify our guest mix through interna- tional guest sourcing , and ensure adequate cash and liquidity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , our brands throughout the world , revitalization of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while expanding our fleet with the new state-of-the-art cruise ships recently delivered and on order , by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , support ongoing operations and initiatives , and the principal industry distribution channel , while enhancing our consumer outreach programs. .\nQuestion: what was the number of global cruise guests in 2011?\nAnswer: 20227000.0\nQuestion: and in 2007?\nAnswer: 16586000.0\nQuestion: so by how much did this value change between these years?\nAnswer: 3641000.0\nQuestion: and the value for 2007 again?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "16586000.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: part i berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 34000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the north american cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . europe in europe , cruising represents a smaller but growing sector of the vacation industry . it has experienced a compound annual growth rate in cruise guests of approximately 9.6% ( 9.6 % ) from 2007 to 2011 and we believe this market has significant continued growth poten- tial . we estimate that europe was served by 104 ships with approximately 100000 berths at the beginning of 2007 and by 121 ships with approximately 155000 berths at the end of 2011 . there are approximately 10 ships with an estimated 28000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the european cruise market between 2012 and 2016 . the following table details the growth in the global , north american and european cruise markets in terms of cruise guests and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : global cruise guests ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise guests ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in north america ( 1 ) european cruise guests ( 3 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in europe ( 1 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>global cruiseguests ( 1 )</td><td>weighted-averagesupplyofberthsmarketedglobally ( 1 )</td><td>northamericancruiseguests ( 2 )</td><td>weighted-average supply ofberths marketedin northamerica ( 1 )</td><td>europeancruiseguests</td><td>weighted-averagesupply ofberthsmarketed ineurope ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>16586000</td><td>327000</td><td>10247000</td><td>212000</td><td>4080000</td><td>105000</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>17184000</td><td>347000</td><td>10093000</td><td>219000</td><td>4500000</td><td>120000</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>17340000</td><td>363000</td><td>10198000</td><td>222000</td><td>5000000</td><td>131000</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>18800000</td><td>391000</td><td>10781000</td><td>232000</td><td>5540000</td><td>143000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>20227000</td><td>412000</td><td>11625000</td><td>245000</td><td>5894000</td><td>149000</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise guests , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally , in north america and europe are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . ( 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . ( 3 ) source : european cruise council for years 2007 through 2010 . year 2011 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . other markets in addition to expected industry growth in north america and europe as discussed above , we expect the asia/pacific region to demonstrate an even higher growth rate in the near term , although it will continue to represent a relatively small sector compared to north america and europe . we compete with a number of cruise lines ; however , our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consum- ers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influ- enced by political and general economic conditions . companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . operating strategies our principal operating strategies are to : and employees and protect the environment in which our vessels and organization operate , to better serve our global guest base and grow our business , order to enhance our revenues while continuing to expand and diversify our guest mix through interna- tional guest sourcing , and ensure adequate cash and liquidity , with the overall goal of maximizing our return on invested capital and long-term shareholder value , our brands throughout the world , revitalization of existing ships and the transfer of key innovations across each brand , while expanding our fleet with the new state-of-the-art cruise ships recently delivered and on order , by deploying them into those markets and itineraries that provide opportunities to optimize returns , while continuing our focus on existing key markets , support ongoing operations and initiatives , and the principal industry distribution channel , while enhancing our consumer outreach programs. .\nQuestion: what was the number of global cruise guests in 2011?\nAnswer: 20227000.0\nQuestion: and in 2007?\nAnswer: 16586000.0\nQuestion: so by how much did this value change between these years?\nAnswer: 3641000.0\nQuestion: and the value for 2007 again?\nAnswer: 16586000.0\nQuestion: so what was the percentage change during this time?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.21952", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: table of contents stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 , 2015 . ( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lear corp. , lkq corp. , meritor inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc . company index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company index</td><td>november 17 2011</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>december 31 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>delphi automotive plc ( 1 )</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.98</td><td>$ 179.33</td><td>$ 285.81</td><td>$ 350.82</td><td>$ 418.67</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 ( 2 )</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.80</td><td>116.93</td><td>154.80</td><td>175.99</td><td>178.43</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>automotive supplier peer group ( 3 )</td><td>100.00</td><td>89.62</td><td>109.96</td><td>166.26</td><td>176.25</td><td>171.91</td></tr></table> dividends the company has declared and paid cash dividends of $ 0.25 per ordinary share in each quarter of 2014 and 2015 . in addition , in january 2016 , the board of directors increased the annual dividend rate to $ 1.16 per ordinary share , and declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.29 per ordinary share , payable on february 29 , 2016 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 17 , 2016. .\nQuestion: what was the price of delphi automotive plc as of 12/31/15?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "418.67", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: table of contents stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 , 2015 . ( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lear corp. , lkq corp. , meritor inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc . company index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company index</td><td>november 17 2011</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>december 31 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>delphi automotive plc ( 1 )</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.98</td><td>$ 179.33</td><td>$ 285.81</td><td>$ 350.82</td><td>$ 418.67</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 ( 2 )</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.80</td><td>116.93</td><td>154.80</td><td>175.99</td><td>178.43</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>automotive supplier peer group ( 3 )</td><td>100.00</td><td>89.62</td><td>109.96</td><td>166.26</td><td>176.25</td><td>171.91</td></tr></table> dividends the company has declared and paid cash dividends of $ 0.25 per ordinary share in each quarter of 2014 and 2015 . in addition , in january 2016 , the board of directors increased the annual dividend rate to $ 1.16 per ordinary share , and declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.29 per ordinary share , payable on february 29 , 2016 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 17 , 2016. .\nQuestion: what was the price of delphi automotive plc as of 12/31/15?\nAnswer: 418.67\nQuestion: and the difference between this price and the starting price as of 11/17/11?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "318.67", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: table of contents stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 , 2015 . ( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lear corp. , lkq corp. , meritor inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc . company index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>company index</td><td>november 17 2011</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>december 31 2013</td><td>december 31 2014</td><td>december 31 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>delphi automotive plc ( 1 )</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.98</td><td>$ 179.33</td><td>$ 285.81</td><td>$ 350.82</td><td>$ 418.67</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 ( 2 )</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.80</td><td>116.93</td><td>154.80</td><td>175.99</td><td>178.43</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>automotive supplier peer group ( 3 )</td><td>100.00</td><td>89.62</td><td>109.96</td><td>166.26</td><td>176.25</td><td>171.91</td></tr></table> dividends the company has declared and paid cash dividends of $ 0.25 per ordinary share in each quarter of 2014 and 2015 . in addition , in january 2016 , the board of directors increased the annual dividend rate to $ 1.16 per ordinary share , and declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.29 per ordinary share , payable on february 29 , 2016 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 17 , 2016. .\nQuestion: what was the price of delphi automotive plc as of 12/31/15?\nAnswer: 418.67\nQuestion: and the difference between this price and the starting price as of 11/17/11?\nAnswer: 318.67\nQuestion: and as a percentage of the original value?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "3.1867", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) t . other commitments and contingencies litigation . we are subject to claims , charges , litigation and other proceedings in the ordinary course of our business , including those arising from or related to contractual matters , intellectual property , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , construction defect , insurance coverage , personnel and employment disputes and other matters , including class actions . we believe we have adequate defenses in these matters and that the outcome of these matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on us . however , there is no assurance that we will prevail in these matters , and we could in the future incur judgments , enter into settlements of claims or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of these matters , which could materially impact our results of operations . in july 2012 , the company reached a settlement agreement related to the columbus drywall litigation . the company and its insulation installation companies named in the suit agreed to pay $ 75 million in return for dismissal with prejudice and full release of all claims . the company and its insulation installation companies continue to deny that the challenged conduct was unlawful and admit no wrongdoing as part of the settlement . a settlement was reached to eliminate the considerable expense and uncertainty of this lawsuit . the company recorded the settlement expense in the second quarter of 2012 and the amount was paid in the fourth quarter of 2012 . warranty . at the time of sale , the company accrues a warranty liability for the estimated cost to provide products , parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations . during the third quarter of 2012 , a business in the other specialty products segment recorded a $ 12 million increase in expected future warranty claims resulting from the completion of an analysis prepared by the company based upon its periodic assessment of recent business unit specific operating trends including , among others , home ownership demographics , sales volumes , manufacturing quality , an analysis of recent warranty claim activity and an estimate of current costs to service anticipated claims . changes in the company 2019s warranty liability were as follows , in millions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 107</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accruals for warranties issued during the year</td><td>42</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accruals related to pre-existing warranties</td><td>16</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements made ( in cash or kind ) during the year</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other net ( including currency translation )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 102</td></tr></table> investments . with respect to the company 2019s investments in private equity funds , the company had , at december 31 , 2012 , commitments to contribute up to $ 19 million of additional capital to such funds representing the company 2019s aggregate capital commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to date . the company is contractually obligated to make additional capital contributions to certain of its private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund . the company has no control over when or if the capital calls will occur . capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in the carrying value of the company 2019s investment in the private equity fund when paid. .\nQuestion: what is the balance in company 2019s warranty liability at the end of 2012?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "118.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) t . other commitments and contingencies litigation . we are subject to claims , charges , litigation and other proceedings in the ordinary course of our business , including those arising from or related to contractual matters , intellectual property , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , construction defect , insurance coverage , personnel and employment disputes and other matters , including class actions . we believe we have adequate defenses in these matters and that the outcome of these matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on us . however , there is no assurance that we will prevail in these matters , and we could in the future incur judgments , enter into settlements of claims or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of these matters , which could materially impact our results of operations . in july 2012 , the company reached a settlement agreement related to the columbus drywall litigation . the company and its insulation installation companies named in the suit agreed to pay $ 75 million in return for dismissal with prejudice and full release of all claims . the company and its insulation installation companies continue to deny that the challenged conduct was unlawful and admit no wrongdoing as part of the settlement . a settlement was reached to eliminate the considerable expense and uncertainty of this lawsuit . the company recorded the settlement expense in the second quarter of 2012 and the amount was paid in the fourth quarter of 2012 . warranty . at the time of sale , the company accrues a warranty liability for the estimated cost to provide products , parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations . during the third quarter of 2012 , a business in the other specialty products segment recorded a $ 12 million increase in expected future warranty claims resulting from the completion of an analysis prepared by the company based upon its periodic assessment of recent business unit specific operating trends including , among others , home ownership demographics , sales volumes , manufacturing quality , an analysis of recent warranty claim activity and an estimate of current costs to service anticipated claims . changes in the company 2019s warranty liability were as follows , in millions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 107</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accruals for warranties issued during the year</td><td>42</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accruals related to pre-existing warranties</td><td>16</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements made ( in cash or kind ) during the year</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other net ( including currency translation )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 102</td></tr></table> investments . with respect to the company 2019s investments in private equity funds , the company had , at december 31 , 2012 , commitments to contribute up to $ 19 million of additional capital to such funds representing the company 2019s aggregate capital commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to date . the company is contractually obligated to make additional capital contributions to certain of its private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund . the company has no control over when or if the capital calls will occur . capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in the carrying value of the company 2019s investment in the private equity fund when paid. .\nQuestion: what is the balance in company 2019s warranty liability at the end of 2012?\nAnswer: 118.0\nQuestion: what about at the end of 2011?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "102.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) t . other commitments and contingencies litigation . we are subject to claims , charges , litigation and other proceedings in the ordinary course of our business , including those arising from or related to contractual matters , intellectual property , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , construction defect , insurance coverage , personnel and employment disputes and other matters , including class actions . we believe we have adequate defenses in these matters and that the outcome of these matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on us . however , there is no assurance that we will prevail in these matters , and we could in the future incur judgments , enter into settlements of claims or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of these matters , which could materially impact our results of operations . in july 2012 , the company reached a settlement agreement related to the columbus drywall litigation . the company and its insulation installation companies named in the suit agreed to pay $ 75 million in return for dismissal with prejudice and full release of all claims . the company and its insulation installation companies continue to deny that the challenged conduct was unlawful and admit no wrongdoing as part of the settlement . a settlement was reached to eliminate the considerable expense and uncertainty of this lawsuit . the company recorded the settlement expense in the second quarter of 2012 and the amount was paid in the fourth quarter of 2012 . warranty . at the time of sale , the company accrues a warranty liability for the estimated cost to provide products , parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations . during the third quarter of 2012 , a business in the other specialty products segment recorded a $ 12 million increase in expected future warranty claims resulting from the completion of an analysis prepared by the company based upon its periodic assessment of recent business unit specific operating trends including , among others , home ownership demographics , sales volumes , manufacturing quality , an analysis of recent warranty claim activity and an estimate of current costs to service anticipated claims . changes in the company 2019s warranty liability were as follows , in millions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 107</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accruals for warranties issued during the year</td><td>42</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accruals related to pre-existing warranties</td><td>16</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements made ( in cash or kind ) during the year</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other net ( including currency translation )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 102</td></tr></table> investments . with respect to the company 2019s investments in private equity funds , the company had , at december 31 , 2012 , commitments to contribute up to $ 19 million of additional capital to such funds representing the company 2019s aggregate capital commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to date . the company is contractually obligated to make additional capital contributions to certain of its private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund . the company has no control over when or if the capital calls will occur . capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in the carrying value of the company 2019s investment in the private equity fund when paid. .\nQuestion: what is the balance in company 2019s warranty liability at the end of 2012?\nAnswer: 118.0\nQuestion: what about at the end of 2011?\nAnswer: 102.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "16.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) t . other commitments and contingencies litigation . we are subject to claims , charges , litigation and other proceedings in the ordinary course of our business , including those arising from or related to contractual matters , intellectual property , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , construction defect , insurance coverage , personnel and employment disputes and other matters , including class actions . we believe we have adequate defenses in these matters and that the outcome of these matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on us . however , there is no assurance that we will prevail in these matters , and we could in the future incur judgments , enter into settlements of claims or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of these matters , which could materially impact our results of operations . in july 2012 , the company reached a settlement agreement related to the columbus drywall litigation . the company and its insulation installation companies named in the suit agreed to pay $ 75 million in return for dismissal with prejudice and full release of all claims . the company and its insulation installation companies continue to deny that the challenged conduct was unlawful and admit no wrongdoing as part of the settlement . a settlement was reached to eliminate the considerable expense and uncertainty of this lawsuit . the company recorded the settlement expense in the second quarter of 2012 and the amount was paid in the fourth quarter of 2012 . warranty . at the time of sale , the company accrues a warranty liability for the estimated cost to provide products , parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations . during the third quarter of 2012 , a business in the other specialty products segment recorded a $ 12 million increase in expected future warranty claims resulting from the completion of an analysis prepared by the company based upon its periodic assessment of recent business unit specific operating trends including , among others , home ownership demographics , sales volumes , manufacturing quality , an analysis of recent warranty claim activity and an estimate of current costs to service anticipated claims . changes in the company 2019s warranty liability were as follows , in millions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 107</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accruals for warranties issued during the year</td><td>42</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accruals related to pre-existing warranties</td><td>16</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements made ( in cash or kind ) during the year</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other net ( including currency translation )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 102</td></tr></table> investments . with respect to the company 2019s investments in private equity funds , the company had , at december 31 , 2012 , commitments to contribute up to $ 19 million of additional capital to such funds representing the company 2019s aggregate capital commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to date . the company is contractually obligated to make additional capital contributions to certain of its private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund . the company has no control over when or if the capital calls will occur . capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in the carrying value of the company 2019s investment in the private equity fund when paid. .\nQuestion: what is the balance in company 2019s warranty liability at the end of 2012?\nAnswer: 118.0\nQuestion: what about at the end of 2011?\nAnswer: 102.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 16.0\nQuestion: what is the balance in company 2019s warranty liability at the end of 2011?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "102.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) t . other commitments and contingencies litigation . we are subject to claims , charges , litigation and other proceedings in the ordinary course of our business , including those arising from or related to contractual matters , intellectual property , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , construction defect , insurance coverage , personnel and employment disputes and other matters , including class actions . we believe we have adequate defenses in these matters and that the outcome of these matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect on us . however , there is no assurance that we will prevail in these matters , and we could in the future incur judgments , enter into settlements of claims or revise our expectations regarding the outcome of these matters , which could materially impact our results of operations . in july 2012 , the company reached a settlement agreement related to the columbus drywall litigation . the company and its insulation installation companies named in the suit agreed to pay $ 75 million in return for dismissal with prejudice and full release of all claims . the company and its insulation installation companies continue to deny that the challenged conduct was unlawful and admit no wrongdoing as part of the settlement . a settlement was reached to eliminate the considerable expense and uncertainty of this lawsuit . the company recorded the settlement expense in the second quarter of 2012 and the amount was paid in the fourth quarter of 2012 . warranty . at the time of sale , the company accrues a warranty liability for the estimated cost to provide products , parts or services to repair or replace products in satisfaction of warranty obligations . during the third quarter of 2012 , a business in the other specialty products segment recorded a $ 12 million increase in expected future warranty claims resulting from the completion of an analysis prepared by the company based upon its periodic assessment of recent business unit specific operating trends including , among others , home ownership demographics , sales volumes , manufacturing quality , an analysis of recent warranty claim activity and an estimate of current costs to service anticipated claims . changes in the company 2019s warranty liability were as follows , in millions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 107</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>accruals for warranties issued during the year</td><td>42</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>accruals related to pre-existing warranties</td><td>16</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>settlements made ( in cash or kind ) during the year</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other net ( including currency translation )</td><td>-4 ( 4 )</td><td>-3 ( 3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 118</td><td>$ 102</td></tr></table> investments . with respect to the company 2019s investments in private equity funds , the company had , at december 31 , 2012 , commitments to contribute up to $ 19 million of additional capital to such funds representing the company 2019s aggregate capital commitment to such funds less capital contributions made to date . the company is contractually obligated to make additional capital contributions to certain of its private equity funds upon receipt of a capital call from the private equity fund . the company has no control over when or if the capital calls will occur . capital calls are funded in cash and generally result in an increase in the carrying value of the company 2019s investment in the private equity fund when paid. .\nQuestion: what is the balance in company 2019s warranty liability at the end of 2012?\nAnswer: 118.0\nQuestion: what about at the end of 2011?\nAnswer: 102.0\nQuestion: what is the net change?\nAnswer: 16.0\nQuestion: what is the balance in company 2019s warranty liability at the end of 2011?\nAnswer: 102.0\nQuestion: what percentage change does this represent?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.15686", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 117 lending-related commitments the firm uses lending-related financial instruments , such as commitments ( including revolving credit facilities ) and guarantees , to address the financing needs of its clients . the contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the clients draw down on these commitments or the firm fulfill its obligations under these guarantees , and the clients subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts . most of these commitments and guarantees are refinanced , extended , cancelled , or expire without being drawn upon or a default occurring . in the firm 2019s view , the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is not representative of the firm 2019s expected future credit exposure or funding requirements . for further information on wholesale lending-related commitments , refer to note 27 . clearing services the firm provides clearing services for clients entering into certain securities and derivative contracts . through the provision of these services the firm is exposed to the risk of non-performance by its clients and may be required to share in losses incurred by ccps . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk to its clients through the collection of adequate margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions and can also cease provision of clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement . for further discussion of clearing services , refer to note 27 . derivative contracts derivatives enable clients and counterparties to manage risks including credit risk and risks arising from fluctuations in interest rates , foreign exchange , equities , and commodities . the firm makes markets in derivatives in order to meet these needs and uses derivatives to manage certain risks associated with net open risk positions from its market-making activities , including the counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange-traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) , such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative contracts through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for a further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , refer to note 5 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total net of cash collateral</td><td>$ 54213</td><td>$ 56523</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a )</td><td>-15322 ( 15322 )</td><td>-16108 ( 16108 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total net of all collateral</td><td>$ 38891</td><td>$ 40415</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes collateral related to derivative instruments where appropriate legal opinions have not been either sought or obtained with respect to master netting agreements . the fair value of derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 54.2 billion and $ 56.5 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . derivative receivables represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other group of seven nations ( 201cg7 201d ) government securities ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 15.3 billion and $ 16.1 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily cash , g7 government securities , other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities , and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative contracts move in the firm 2019s favor . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , refer to note 5 . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak represents a conservative measure of potential exposure to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level over the life of the transaction . peak is the primary measure used by the firm for setting of credit limits for derivative contracts , senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be .\nQuestion: in the 2018 review of the net derivative receivable, how much did the total net of cash collateral represent in relation to the liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "3.53825", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 117 lending-related commitments the firm uses lending-related financial instruments , such as commitments ( including revolving credit facilities ) and guarantees , to address the financing needs of its clients . the contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the clients draw down on these commitments or the firm fulfill its obligations under these guarantees , and the clients subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts . most of these commitments and guarantees are refinanced , extended , cancelled , or expire without being drawn upon or a default occurring . in the firm 2019s view , the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is not representative of the firm 2019s expected future credit exposure or funding requirements . for further information on wholesale lending-related commitments , refer to note 27 . clearing services the firm provides clearing services for clients entering into certain securities and derivative contracts . through the provision of these services the firm is exposed to the risk of non-performance by its clients and may be required to share in losses incurred by ccps . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk to its clients through the collection of adequate margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions and can also cease provision of clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement . for further discussion of clearing services , refer to note 27 . derivative contracts derivatives enable clients and counterparties to manage risks including credit risk and risks arising from fluctuations in interest rates , foreign exchange , equities , and commodities . the firm makes markets in derivatives in order to meet these needs and uses derivatives to manage certain risks associated with net open risk positions from its market-making activities , including the counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange-traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) , such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative contracts through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for a further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , refer to note 5 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total net of cash collateral</td><td>$ 54213</td><td>$ 56523</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a )</td><td>-15322 ( 15322 )</td><td>-16108 ( 16108 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total net of all collateral</td><td>$ 38891</td><td>$ 40415</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes collateral related to derivative instruments where appropriate legal opinions have not been either sought or obtained with respect to master netting agreements . the fair value of derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 54.2 billion and $ 56.5 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . derivative receivables represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other group of seven nations ( 201cg7 201d ) government securities ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 15.3 billion and $ 16.1 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily cash , g7 government securities , other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities , and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative contracts move in the firm 2019s favor . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , refer to note 5 . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak represents a conservative measure of potential exposure to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level over the life of the transaction . peak is the primary measure used by the firm for setting of credit limits for derivative contracts , senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be .\nQuestion: in the 2018 review of the net derivative receivable, how much did the total net of cash collateral represent in relation to the liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables?\nAnswer: 3.53825\nQuestion: and what was that net of cash collateral in the year before?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "56523.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 117 lending-related commitments the firm uses lending-related financial instruments , such as commitments ( including revolving credit facilities ) and guarantees , to address the financing needs of its clients . the contractual amounts of these financial instruments represent the maximum possible credit risk should the clients draw down on these commitments or the firm fulfill its obligations under these guarantees , and the clients subsequently fail to perform according to the terms of these contracts . most of these commitments and guarantees are refinanced , extended , cancelled , or expire without being drawn upon or a default occurring . in the firm 2019s view , the total contractual amount of these wholesale lending-related commitments is not representative of the firm 2019s expected future credit exposure or funding requirements . for further information on wholesale lending-related commitments , refer to note 27 . clearing services the firm provides clearing services for clients entering into certain securities and derivative contracts . through the provision of these services the firm is exposed to the risk of non-performance by its clients and may be required to share in losses incurred by ccps . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk to its clients through the collection of adequate margin at inception and throughout the life of the transactions and can also cease provision of clearing services if clients do not adhere to their obligations under the clearing agreement . for further discussion of clearing services , refer to note 27 . derivative contracts derivatives enable clients and counterparties to manage risks including credit risk and risks arising from fluctuations in interest rates , foreign exchange , equities , and commodities . the firm makes markets in derivatives in order to meet these needs and uses derivatives to manage certain risks associated with net open risk positions from its market-making activities , including the counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables . the firm also uses derivative instruments to manage its own credit and other market risk exposure . the nature of the counterparty and the settlement mechanism of the derivative affect the credit risk to which the firm is exposed . for otc derivatives the firm is exposed to the credit risk of the derivative counterparty . for exchange-traded derivatives ( 201cetd 201d ) , such as futures and options , and 201ccleared 201d over-the-counter ( 201cotc-cleared 201d ) derivatives , the firm is generally exposed to the credit risk of the relevant ccp . where possible , the firm seeks to mitigate its credit risk exposures arising from derivative contracts through the use of legally enforceable master netting arrangements and collateral agreements . for a further discussion of derivative contracts , counterparties and settlement types , refer to note 5 . the following table summarizes the net derivative receivables for the periods presented . derivative receivables . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total net of cash collateral</td><td>$ 54213</td><td>$ 56523</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables ( a )</td><td>-15322 ( 15322 )</td><td>-16108 ( 16108 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total net of all collateral</td><td>$ 38891</td><td>$ 40415</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes collateral related to derivative instruments where appropriate legal opinions have not been either sought or obtained with respect to master netting agreements . the fair value of derivative receivables reported on the consolidated balance sheets were $ 54.2 billion and $ 56.5 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . derivative receivables represent the fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the firm . however , in management 2019s view , the appropriate measure of current credit risk should also take into consideration additional liquid securities ( primarily u.s . government and agency securities and other group of seven nations ( 201cg7 201d ) government securities ) and other cash collateral held by the firm aggregating $ 15.3 billion and $ 16.1 billion at december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively , that may be used as security when the fair value of the client 2019s exposure is in the firm 2019s favor . in addition to the collateral described in the preceding paragraph , the firm also holds additional collateral ( primarily cash , g7 government securities , other liquid government-agency and guaranteed securities , and corporate debt and equity securities ) delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions , as well as collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency and collateral that the firm has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . although this collateral does not reduce the balances and is not included in the table above , it is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the client 2019s derivative contracts move in the firm 2019s favor . the derivative receivables fair value , net of all collateral , also does not include other credit enhancements , such as letters of credit . for additional information on the firm 2019s use of collateral agreements , refer to note 5 . while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak represents a conservative measure of potential exposure to a counterparty calculated in a manner that is broadly equivalent to a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level over the life of the transaction . peak is the primary measure used by the firm for setting of credit limits for derivative contracts , senior management reporting and derivatives exposure management . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be .\nQuestion: in the 2018 review of the net derivative receivable, how much did the total net of cash collateral represent in relation to the liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables?\nAnswer: 3.53825\nQuestion: and what was that net of cash collateral in the year before?\nAnswer: 56523.0\nQuestion: what was, then, the decline in that cash from 2017 to 2018?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "2310.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: asset category target allocation total quoted prices in active markets for identical assets ( level 1 ) significant observable inputs ( level 2 ) significant unobservable inputs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>level 3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1 2018</td><td>$ 278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>actual return on assets</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements net</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31 2018</td><td>$ 230</td></tr></table> balance as of january 1 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140 actual return on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 balance as of december 31 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 278 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed- income assets relative to liabilities . the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond- .\nQuestion: what was the balance of level 3 in 2018?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "230.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: asset category target allocation total quoted prices in active markets for identical assets ( level 1 ) significant observable inputs ( level 2 ) significant unobservable inputs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>level 3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1 2018</td><td>$ 278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>actual return on assets</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements net</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31 2018</td><td>$ 230</td></tr></table> balance as of january 1 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140 actual return on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 balance as of december 31 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 278 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed- income assets relative to liabilities . the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond- .\nQuestion: what was the balance of level 3 in 2018?\nAnswer: 230.0\nQuestion: and as of 2017?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "140.0", "role": "assistant" } ]

[ { "content": "Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.\n\nText: asset category target allocation total quoted prices in active markets for identical assets ( level 1 ) significant observable inputs ( level 2 ) significant unobservable inputs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>level 3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance as of january 1 2018</td><td>$ 278</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>actual return on assets</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases issuances and settlements net</td><td>-25 ( 25 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance as of december 31 2018</td><td>$ 230</td></tr></table> balance as of january 1 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140 actual return on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 balance as of december 31 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 278 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed- income assets relative to liabilities . the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond- .\nQuestion: what was the balance of level 3 in 2018?\nAnswer: 230.0\nQuestion: and as of 2017?\nAnswer: 140.0\nQuestion: so what was the change in value during these years?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "90.0", "role": "assistant" } ]