Datasets:

Siki-77

/

Amazon_Category

like 1

source1_31520824_59

Nonsense. There needs to be clear rules and accountability. Every single public dollar needs to be well spent. Period.

solution:2 specific_points:2

no_non_con:2 unsubstantial:1

no_toxic:2 embarrassment:1

Nonsense . There needs to be clear rules and accountability . Every single public dollar needs to be well spent . Period .

source1_31520824_71

In my opinion, this waste of the taxpayer's hard earned cash is more than a couple of Federal Government ministers being loose with tax dollars for their own benefit....multiply this within the entire Federal government, the ten provinces and three territories, and hundreds of municipal governments... I'm sure it would add up to a significant sum....what makes this situation worse is the perceived entitlement of those in high places....the basic question always need to be asked: is the taxpayer getting value for money expended by these government officials? They obviously need to be reminded that they work for us, not the other way around.

dialogue:2 specific_points:1

no_non_con:2 unsubstantial:1

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1

In my opinion , this waste of the taxpayers hard earned cash is more than a couple of Federal Government ministers being loose with tax dollars for their own benefit ... .multiply this within the entire Federal government , the ten provinces and three territories , and hundreds of municipal governments ... Im sure it would add up to a significant sum ... .what makes this situation worse is the perceived entitlement of those in high places ... .the basic question always need to be asked : is the taxpayer getting value for money expended by these government officials ? They obviously need to be reminded that they work for us , not the other way around .

source1_32604218_121

He does in fact have an obligation to not involve himself in the political process. There is a long standing directive that is renewed every 4 years stating that members of the justice department should not take actions that could be viewed as political in nature within 60 days of an election. He chose instead to ignore this and for what. They did not even know the contents of the emails and given the prior precedent of the recommendation that he made a few months ago it is unlikely that his conclusion will change. Therefore, he could end up handing the election to Trump and costing the Democrats many down ballot seats and then announce once the investigation is concluded that there was no change in the FBIs position on Clinton's activities. That to me is a huge gamble with the electoral process and the reputation of the FBI.

evidence:3 specific_points:2 solution:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:2 teasing:1

He does in fact have an obligation to not involve himself in the political process . There is a long standing directive that is renewed every 4 years stating that members of the justice department should not take actions that could be viewed as political in nature within 60 days of an election . He chose instead to ignore this and for what . They did not even know the contents of the emails and given the prior precedent of the recommendation that he made a few months ago it is unlikely that his conclusion will change . Therefore , he could end up handing the election to Trump and costing the Democrats many down ballot seats and then announce once the investigation is concluded that there was no change in the FBIs position on Clintons activities . That to me is a huge gamble with the electoral process and the reputation of the FBI .

source1_32604218_36

the Editorial Board ignores that, aside from her unpunished crimes, if ms. Clinton had a shred of self respect, dignity and concern for the country, would withdraw her candidacy and possibly run again in four years, after hers and her husband's many issues will have been resolved, hopefully showing her innocence. By the way, in July, the FBI did not 'dismiss' the charges; to the contrary, it found them valid, but chose to let her go, thereby diminishing itself and the entire US judicial system. New, the Director is trying to undo the damage: the ancient Romans used to say: 'Dura Lex Sed Lex' .

specific_points:3 personal_story:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1

the Editorial Board ignores that , aside from her unpunished crimes , if ms. Clinton had a shred of self respect , dignity and concern for the country , would withdraw her candidacy and possibly run again in four years , after hers and her husbands many issues will have been resolved , hopefully showing her innocence . By the way , in July , the FBI did not dismiss the charges ; to the contrary , it found them valid , but chose to let her go , thereby diminishing itself and the entire US judicial system . New , the Director is trying to undo the damage : the ancient Romans used to say : Dura Lex Sed Lex .

source1_32604218_65

The Justice Department could have ordered the FBI not to make a statement. They choose not to exercise that option, one has to wonder why

specific_points:2 evidence:1 dialogue:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:2 inflammatory:1

The Justice Department could have ordered the FBI not to make a statement . They choose not to exercise that option , one has to wonder why

source1_29037053_76

The author forgot to mention Trump's call for a Mexican wall has wide spread appeal, especially for those in the bordering states. With 11 million illegals presently residing in the USA waiting for another amnesty, a physical wall controlling the border crosses both among Democrats and Republicans. Despite criticism from elites, Trump has sold the wall successfully. Gotta love it when the Mexican President uses profanity about the wall and Trump replies back that it will be ten feet taller!

specific_points:3 evidence:2 dialogue:2

no_non_con:5 unsubstantial:1

no_toxic:2 teasing:1

The author forgot to mention Trumps call for a Mexican wall has wide spread appeal , especially for those in the bordering states . With 11 million illegals presently residing in the USA waiting for another amnesty , a physical wall controlling the border crosses both among Democrats and Republicans . Despite criticism from elites , Trump has sold the wall successfully . Got ta love it when the Mexican President uses profanity about the wall and Trump replies back that it will be ten feet taller !

source1_29037053_58

You raise an interesting issue, Margaret, although you don't deal with it adequately. I guess you're saying, in effect, that we don't want a person as seemingly erratic as Trump as president with his fingers on the buttons and all. First off, surely there are now safeguards to overturn decisions of presidents when it comes to nuclear war. At least, I hope there are. Second, Trump at least is opposed to aggressive wars and won't bomb Iran as other Republican candidates have threatened. That's a greater threat to peace than anything Trump has suggested.

specific_points:3 dialogue:2

no_non_con:2 sarcastic:1

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1 inflammatory:1 teasing:1 embarrassment:1

You raise an interesting issue , Margaret , although you dont deal with it adequately . I guess youre saying , in effect , that we dont want a person as seemingly erratic as Trump as president with his fingers on the buttons and all . First off , surely there are now safeguards to overturn decisions of presidents when it comes to nuclear war . At least , I hope there are . Second , Trump at least is opposed to aggressive wars and wont bomb Iran as other Republican candidates have threatened . Thats a greater threat to peace than anything Trump has suggested .

source1_28225596_123

I find it amazing that Conservatives in Canada are experiencing what Labour is experiencing in Britain. Conservatives are currently very popular (vs Labour or LibDems) in Britain and yet as P. Manning argues, they are out of most governments in Canada. Why? I am not sure. I think Harper did a lot of damage. I sometimes think that most Canadians, by nature, are Liberals (or Labour) and not really conservative... and if Liberals don't screw up via another corruption scandal they could be in power for a long time.

specific_points:2 evidence:2

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1 inflammatory:1 embarrassment:1

I find it amazing that Conservatives in Canada are experiencing what Labour is experiencing in Britain . Conservatives are currently very popular ( vs Labour or LibDems ) in Britain and yet as P. Manning argues , they are out of most governments in Canada . Why ? I am not sure . I think Harper did a lot of damage . I sometimes think that most Canadians , by nature , are Liberals ( or Labour ) and not really conservative ... and if Liberals dont screw up via another corruption scandal they could be in power for a long time .

source1_29642815_46

Politicians say a lot of things during the election and govern differently as reality sets in. I will not blame Trudeau for the stupidity of his followers. Yes you who posted repeated about Harper as evil and Trudeau as the second coming you know who you are. Governing is somewhat different than just taking the high moral ground when it costs you more than the other guy. In the Saudi deal Canada would have lost a lot of high paying jobs at a time when they are hard to come by. The Saudis would have laughed to the moralizing and would have gone to another country most happy to fulfill the order for armored cars.

specific_points:3 evidence:1 personal_story:1 dialogue:1

no_non_con:4

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1 inflammatory:1 teasing:1 embarrassment:1

Politicians say a lot of things during the election and govern differently as reality sets in . I will not blame Trudeau for the stupidity of his followers . Yes you who posted repeated about Harper as evil and Trudeau as the second coming you know who you are . Governing is somewhat different than just taking the high moral ground when it costs you more than the other guy . In the Saudi deal Canada would have lost a lot of high paying jobs at a time when they are hard to come by . The Saudis would have laughed to the moralizing and would have gone to another country most happy to fulfill the order for armored cars .

source1_29642815_24

Gerald Butts is either lying to us or is so naive as to never be allowed anywhere near the PM. A non-carbon based economy by 2050? What does he imagine will replace our dependency on fossil fuels, other than greenies wishful thinking? As the article states; it's easy to criticize those who do the work, a lot more difficult to do better when it's your turn.

specific_points:2 personal_story:1

no_non_con:2 unsubstantial:1

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1 inflammatory:1 teasing:1

Gerald Butts is either lying to us or is so naive as to never be allowed anywhere near the PM . A non-carbon based economy by 2050 ? What does he imagine will replace our dependency on fossil fuels , other than greenies wishful thinking ? As the article states ; its easy to criticize those who do the work , a lot more difficult to do better when its your turn .

source1_16350272_66

The York University train of events illustrates that finding an optimum balance between worthy values is no easy task in all cases. It is true that some of us, reviewing this case, will come down strongly on one side or the other but the fact remains that no neat formula or process exists in a few cases like this whereby persons of good will can all agree upon the balance between contending rights that is most appropriate. For what it's worth I would argue that both Professor Grayson and York University each addressed the situation they faced with good will and intelligence and that each tried their best to weigh how the respective rights and dignity of all the persons involved could be best respected. Further, the fact that the Human Rights Code does not provide a ready-made answer in this situation does not negate the value of that Code as a framework within which to strive to resolve difficult cases like this. The truth, arguably, illustrated by this story as a whole is that morals, ethics and legal reasoning are processes rather than fixed outcomes. The point is that we must try to do the right thing realizing that discerning what the best outcome should be is sometimes difficult and that other, no better or worse than ourselves, might honestly come to a different conclusion in the circumstances - and also that the very effort to arrive at the best solution (even if 'best' is murky) is a worthy exercise.

specific_points:4 solution:2 evidence:1 dialogue:1 personal_story:1

no_non_con:4 sarcastic:1 no_respect:1

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1 inflammatory:1 teasing:1 embarrassment:1

The York University train of events illustrates that finding an optimum balance between worthy values is no easy task in all cases . It is true that some of us , reviewing this case , will come down strongly on one side or the other but the fact remains that no neat formula or process exists in a few cases like this whereby persons of good will can all agree upon the balance between contending rights that is most appropriate . For what its worth I would argue that both Professor Grayson and York University each addressed the situation they faced with good will and intelligence and that each tried their best to weigh how the respective rights and dignity of all the persons involved could be best respected . Further , the fact that the Human Rights Code does not provide a ready-made answer in this situation does not negate the value of that Code as a framework within which to strive to resolve difficult cases like this . The truth , arguably , illustrated by this story as a whole is that morals , ethics and legal reasoning are processes rather than fixed outcomes . The point is that we must try to do the right thing realizing that discerning what the best outcome should be is sometimes difficult and that other , no better or worse than ourselves , might honestly come to a different conclusion in the circumstances - and also that the very effort to arrive at the best solution ( even if best is murky ) is a worthy exercise .

source1_16350272_98

I have to agree with this - it reflects much of what I wrote on this website yesterday:'.. the real tragedy is that York's Office of Human Rights put a bigoted and misogynistic request by a student claiming religious beliefs ahead of the values enshrined in a modern Canada: namely equality of all, irrespective of gender. While we all hold some York administrator to account, who is doing the same for the many Offices of Human Rights that have spread like wildfire in the past few decades...?' [1/15/2014 4:26PM]

specific_points:2 evidence:2 solution:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1

I have to agree with this - it reflects much of what I wrote on this website yesterday : .. the real tragedy is that Yorks Office of Human Rights put a bigoted and misogynistic request by a student claiming religious beliefs ahead of the values enshrined in a modern Canada : namely equality of all , irrespective of gender . While we all hold some York administrator to account , who is doing the same for the many Offices of Human Rights that have spread like wildfire in the past few decades ... ? [ 1/15/2014 4:26PM ]

source1_16350272_3

Like most Canadians, I applaud Professor Grayson for his rational approach to this issue. Nevertheless I sense in the writing of this article, the heavy hand of York University's myopic, misogynistic, misguided, overly placative administration. The university president and faculty dean took the route of least resistance, which was to accommodate a bigoted request from one male student at the expense of female students - and all women -everywhere. What this story, the story of the aikido student in Nova Scotia, and the now almost daily incidence of the tolerance of Canadians being tried by religious zealots tells us is that Quebec's Charter of Values is only a first step toward bringing rationality to the interpretation of human rights in this country. These threats can only be thwarted by a concerted move to secularization in our society. Only through secularization can we ensure that gender equality, racial equality and other such innate rights take precedence over the growing array of complex, conflicting, and confounding religious practices being foisted on Canadians. Any accommodation that diminishes and demeans women - such as that insisted upon by York University - must be rejected soundly as gender discrimination. I can tell York what my 17 year old daughter has told me - that York University is no longer on her list of respected, prospective post-secondary institutions.

solution:2 evidence:2 personal_story:1 specific_points:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1 inflammatory:1 teasing:1 embarrassment:1

Like most Canadians , I applaud Professor Grayson for his rational approach to this issue . Nevertheless I sense in the writing of this article , the heavy hand of York Universitys myopic , misogynistic , misguided , overly placative administration . The university president and faculty dean took the route of least resistance , which was to accommodate a bigoted request from one male student at the expense of female students - and all women -everywhere . What this story , the story of the aikido student in Nova Scotia , and the now almost daily incidence of the tolerance of Canadians being tried by religious zealots tells us is that Quebecs Charter of Values is only a first step toward bringing rationality to the interpretation of human rights in this country . These threats can only be thwarted by a concerted move to secularization in our society . Only through secularization can we ensure that gender equality , racial equality and other such innate rights take precedence over the growing array of complex , conflicting , and confounding religious practices being foisted on Canadians . Any accommodation that diminishes and demeans women - such as that insisted upon by York University - must be rejected soundly as gender discrimination . I can tell York what my 17 year old daughter has told me - that York University is no longer on her list of respected , prospective post-secondary institutions .

source1_16350272_71

We seem to forget that many of mainstream religions discriminate against women and have been doing so for ages often formally sanctioned within religious school systems. Ironically this seems to be perfectly acceptable- and blatantly hypocritical. Men and women meeting in public may be OK but can you aspire to be a Catholic priest if you are a woman? Not a chance. Talk about engrained gender bias and separation of the sexes where it really counts.

specific_points:2 dialogue:2 solution:1 evidence:1

no_non_con:2 provocative:1

no_toxic:2 inflammatory:1

We seem to forget that many of mainstream religions discriminate against women and have been doing so for ages often formally sanctioned within religious school systems . Ironically this seems to be perfectly acceptable- and blatantly hypocritical . Men and women meeting in public may be OK but can you aspire to be a Catholic priest if you are a woman ? Not a chance . Talk about engrained gender bias and separation of the sexes where it really counts .

source1_21820448_91

Dare one hope that The G & M will gather courage to pen an editorial now, albeit a little too late, and admit that endorsing Harper was an unmitigated mistake?

specific_points:3 evidence:1

no_non_con:2 provocative:1

no_toxic:2 teasing:1

Dare one hope that The G & M will gather courage to pen an editorial now , albeit a little too late , and admit that endorsing Harper was an unmitigated mistake ?

source1_31696963_32

Canada needs to get its head out of the sand and ditch the PC editorials as well. I just got back from continental Europe and there is a very strong anti-immigrant (from the Middle East) chorus growing and I'm not talking about that from the far right. These are people who in the past supported an open door immigration policy, but who are now saying hold on there EU bureaucrat we want to have some say in who enters our 'house' and who doesn't. That debate is much further advanced in Europe, but really comes down to not diluting down what it means to be Dutch, French, German, or the like. You cannot allow in people from the desert region who have completely different software installed on their hard drive which says that women are inferior to men and that a certain religious text should be followed first before the laws of their adopted country. Critical thinking skills and equality of men and women are frowned upon. It is high time we realized that Western democratic values are not compatible with 800 year old Middle Eastern tribal values. We would welcome immigrants from that region of the world (say the Ismailis) who are educated, able to separate mosque from state, and who will state that they are Canadian first before any other slelf-identifier. The rest can stay home and modernize their own backyards before applying to come here.

specific_points:4 evidence:2

no_non_con:4

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1

Canada needs to get its head out of the sand and ditch the PC editorials as well . I just got back from continental Europe and there is a very strong anti-immigrant ( from the Middle East ) chorus growing and Im not talking about that from the far right . These are people who in the past supported an open door immigration policy , but who are now saying hold on there EU bureaucrat we want to have some say in who enters our house and who doesnt . That debate is much further advanced in Europe , but really comes down to not diluting down what it means to be Dutch , French , German , or the like . You can not allow in people from the desert region who have completely different software installed on their hard drive which says that women are inferior to men and that a certain religious text should be followed first before the laws of their adopted country . Critical thinking skills and equality of men and women are frowned upon . It is high time we realized that Western democratic values are not compatible with 800 year old Middle Eastern tribal values . We would welcome immigrants from that region of the world ( say the Ismailis ) who are educated , able to separate mosque from state , and who will state that they are Canadian first before any other slelf-identifier . The rest can stay home and modernize their own backyards before applying to come here .

source1_31696963_55

What Leitch has accomplished is setting herself apart from the other aspirants in becoming a national figure seeking office of a powerful political Party. She has accomplished this. The others are having a prolonged breakfast at the starting gate. She has raised a question of a question that should be asked of all immigrants in what motivates them to want to live in this country. Answering honestly and not with pro-Canada jingoism. Yes, it requires thoughtfulness as the consequences of becoming Canadian is til death do us part. A few more workers hired to interview and read. The benefits will impact for generations. Sadly, there will be opposition to her as a woman of Conservative opinion who declare open season to demean her. She has to remain focused of expressing with the intellect that God granted her. So far, she has been correct that mutilations to women, apparel designed to shame women, are outlawed. No more objectification of women which is not an ideal. It is a right. Leitch is the emerging candidate. She clearly differentiates from Trudeau. She has to show what it takes to be another Merkel or Thatcher or even E2. Intellect versus image. Game on.

specific_points:4 solution:2 evidence:2 dialogue:1

no_non_con:5 unsubstantial:1

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1 inflammatory:1 teasing:1 embarrassment:1

What Leitch has accomplished is setting herself apart from the other aspirants in becoming a national figure seeking office of a powerful political Party . She has accomplished this . The others are having a prolonged breakfast at the starting gate . She has raised a question of a question that should be asked of all immigrants in what motivates them to want to live in this country . Answering honestly and not with pro-Canada jingoism . Yes , it requires thoughtfulness as the consequences of becoming Canadian is til death do us part . A few more workers hired to interview and read . The benefits will impact for generations . Sadly , there will be opposition to her as a woman of Conservative opinion who declare open season to demean her . She has to remain focused of expressing with the intellect that God granted her . So far , she has been correct that mutilations to women , apparel designed to shame women , are outlawed . No more objectification of women which is not an ideal . It is a right . Leitch is the emerging candidate . She clearly differentiates from Trudeau . She has to show what it takes to be another Merkel or Thatcher or even E2 . Intellect versus image . Game on .

source1_31696963_60

'who-gets-to-decide-what-canadian-values-are' That's an excellent question. Those who set the rules of political correctness decide what Canadian values are. But millions of Canadians feel that Canadian values are eroding, largely due to wave after wave of immigrants. The G & M wants us to believe the hodge podge of multicultural, multireligiousvalues that serves Canada's corporatist economy is tolerable, workable, most of all profitable, and therefore, expediently politically correct.'There are no prescribed religious or cultural beliefs, just a vow to respect our constitution and our laws, and to accept the consequences of failing to do so.' But how many people are familiar with the intricacies of Canada's constitution? Conservatives tend to have the attitude that 'You can do anything you want, but lay off of my blue suede fiscal policy'. Liberals are conservatives who believe in legalized pot and smiling a lot. The G & M, like the establishment in general, likes to keep Canadian values ambiguous, ambivalent, undefined, and amorphously changing. That way political correctness rules. And it's the media like the G & M who gets to decide what political correctness is. But the fact is, if Canadian values are shifting from democratic European to authoritarian Asian, elitists like the G & M are quite happy about that.

dialogue:2 no_con:1 specific_points:1 evidence:1

no_non_con:2 provocative:1

no_toxic:2 teasing:1

who-gets-to-decide-what-canadian-values-are Thats an excellent question . Those who set the rules of political correctness decide what Canadian values are . But millions of Canadians feel that Canadian values are eroding , largely due to wave after wave of immigrants . The G & M wants us to believe the hodge podge of multicultural , multireligiousvalues that serves Canadas corporatist economy is tolerable , workable , most of all profitable , and therefore , expediently politically correct.There are no prescribed religious or cultural beliefs , just a vow to respect our constitution and our laws , and to accept the consequences of failing to do so . But how many people are familiar with the intricacies of Canadas constitution ? Conservatives tend to have the attitude that You can do anything you want , but lay off of my blue suede fiscal policy . Liberals are conservatives who believe in legalized pot and smiling a lot . The G & M , like the establishment in general , likes to keep Canadian values ambiguous , ambivalent , undefined , and amorphously changing . That way political correctness rules . And its the media like the G & M who gets to decide what political correctness is . But the fact is , if Canadian values are shifting from democratic European to authoritarian Asian , elitists like the G & M are quite happy about that .

source1_31696963_134

If people move to Canada, they should be allowed freedom of belief. Their actions are governed by the justice code and the constitution. Some of the comments are pretty Orwellian. We could end up with as paralyzed a society as the ones from the outside that we seem to be afraid of. Canada is an open and healthy society. Our attitudes should reflect and ,in fact, spread this. I meet a lot of new Canadians, say 25 years and less, living in Canada. I observe that most of them are very happy to be here, and not because they are allowed to behave in some nefarious way, but because it is friendly, safe a and free. If you believe in the boogey man, it exists.

personal_story:2 evidence:1 dialogue:1

no_non_con:2 no_respect:1

no_toxic:2 teasing:1

If people move to Canada , they should be allowed freedom of belief . Their actions are governed by the justice code and the constitution . Some of the comments are pretty Orwellian . We could end up with as paralyzed a society as the ones from the outside that we seem to be afraid of . Canada is an open and healthy society . Our attitudes should reflect and , in fact , spread this . I meet a lot of new Canadians , say 25 years and less , living in Canada . I observe that most of them are very happy to be here , and not because they are allowed to behave in some nefarious way , but because it is friendly , safe a and free . If you believe in the boogey man , it exists .

source1_25141317_77

The LPC began its death march the moment Dion signed the 'coalition' document. You didn't need to read this article, I've been commenting about the demise of the LPC for years, and the necessity of a two part system in Canada to properly represent the electorate. Canadians will be far better off when the LPC is gone forever.

specific_points:2 personal_story:1 solution:1 evidence:1

no_non_con:2 provocative:1

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1 inflammatory:1

The LPC began its death march the moment Dion signed the coalition document . You didnt need to read this article , Ive been commenting about the demise of the LPC for years , and the necessity of a two part system in Canada to properly represent the electorate . Canadians will be far better off when the LPC is gone forever .

source1_25141317_45

I don't understand the fear and loathing that the left has with Mr. Harper. He has done a good job with the economy in these horrid times and he has been good with foreign affairs. He knows who the enemies are and he knows that the global warming alarmists are full of BS. He is wrong on the pot issue, but pretty much right with most other issues. Much-hair will sink the ship, Justin Clouseau will burn it to the water level. Harper will keep it afloat. This next election is about economy and we should leave ideology out of it .... vote for prosperity, without it, nothing much else matters ... you know ... food, rent, transportation, work ... etc.

specific_points:2 dialogue:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:2 teasing:1 embarrassment:1

I dont understand the fear and loathing that the left has with Mr. Harper . He has done a good job with the economy in these horrid times and he has been good with foreign affairs . He knows who the enemies are and he knows that the global warming alarmists are full of BS . He is wrong on the pot issue , but pretty much right with most other issues . Much-hair will sink the ship , Justin Clouseau will burn it to the water level . Harper will keep it afloat . This next election is about economy and we should leave ideology out of it ... . vote for prosperity , without it , nothing much else matters ... you know ... food , rent , transportation , work ... etc .

source1_25141317_115

Quebec was the Liberal's stronghold from Trudeau onward. The Liberals have continued to focus on Quebec native sons to lead the party in order to maintain their Quebec stronghold. The leaders post Martin have proved to be weak and unable to gain the confidence of the country. As for Quebec being a stronghold, even if the Liberals were to win Quebec, it would not be enough to win the country. And with Trudeau at the helm, the possibility of the Liberal party being beaten badly is quite likely.

specific_points:3 solution:1

no_non_con:2 no_respect:1

no_toxic:2 inflammatory:1

Quebec was the Liberals stronghold from Trudeau onward . The Liberals have continued to focus on Quebec native sons to lead the party in order to maintain their Quebec stronghold . The leaders post Martin have proved to be weak and unable to gain the confidence of the country . As for Quebec being a stronghold , even if the Liberals were to win Quebec , it would not be enough to win the country . And with Trudeau at the helm , the possibility of the Liberal party being beaten badly is quite likely .

source1_11579462_142

It may be within the rules to send out such mailings, but it's not right. Parties should use public money for public service and party money for party purposes. It doesn't matter if this has been standard procedure for many years in various forms, it's wrong.

specific_points:3 solution:2 evidence:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:2 inflammatory:1

It may be within the rules to send out such mailings , but its not right . Parties should use public money for public service and party money for party purposes . It doesnt matter if this has been standard procedure for many years in various forms , its wrong .

source1_11579462_32

Thanks for doing this, Jeffrey. It would be very interesting to follow this up with an article on how Parliament's Board of Internal Economy works (or not), and how MP allocations are used (or abused).Taxpayers may be interesting in knowing how their MP spends their money. The Member's Expenditure Report below provides the latest audited breakdown by member, including line items for printing expenses and postage, and specifically the notorious 'ten-percenters.'www.parl.gc.ca/PublicDisclosure/MemberExpenditures.aspx?Language=E&Year=2011-2012

specific_points:2 personal_story:1 solution:1

no_non_con:2 unsubstantial:1

no_toxic:2 inflammatory:1

Thanks for doing this , Jeffrey . It would be very interesting to follow this up with an article on how Parliaments Board of Internal Economy works ( or not ) , and how MP allocations are used ( or abused ) .Taxpayers may be interesting in knowing how their MP spends their money . The Members Expenditure Report below provides the latest audited breakdown by member , including line items for printing expenses and postage , and specifically the notorious ten-percenters.www.parl.gc.ca/PublicDisclosure/MemberExpenditures.aspx ? Language=E & Year=2011-2012

source1_19639369_67

Ms Wente, is deadly accurate. I am a health provider and am frequently shocked and saddened at the 'nanny society' that we are creating. Public and authorities have lost any sense of balance and perspective, and seem so terrified of 'overlooking ' real abuse, that like in the MacCarthy era in the US there are imagined threats everywhere. We need to trust parents to care for their children- most do so very well. Smothering our children by accompanying them to every park and play activity, does not foster independent play, problem solving and socialization. We must teach our children to be safe but not by smothering them, and making them fearful of the entire world and everyone in it.Thank you Margaret Wente.

specific_points:2 personal_story:2 dialogue:1 evidence:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1 inflammatory:1 teasing:1 embarrassment:1

Ms Wente , is deadly accurate . I am a health provider and am frequently shocked and saddened at the nanny society that we are creating . Public and authorities have lost any sense of balance and perspective , and seem so terrified of overlooking real abuse , that like in the MacCarthy era in the US there are imagined threats everywhere . We need to trust parents to care for their children- most do so very well . Smothering our children by accompanying them to every park and play activity , does not foster independent play , problem solving and socialization . We must teach our children to be safe but not by smothering them , and making them fearful of the entire world and everyone in it.Thank you Margaret Wente .

source1_19639369_101

I have children and I work with children with a youth organization at the age where they start to get freedom and work/play independently. I tend to err on the side of more supervision rather than less supervision both for their benefit and mine.

personal_story:3 specific_points:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1 inflammatory:1 teasing:1 embarrassment:1

I have children and I work with children with a youth organization at the age where they start to get freedom and work/play independently . I tend to err on the side of more supervision rather than less supervision both for their benefit and mine .

source1_19639369_82

As an often 'overprotective' mother myself, I wholeheartedly agree with Wente's position here. It bothers me that other people can be so judgemental of parents these days. It's particularly irksome to be given unsolicited advice and unwelcome criticism from people who were parents in a more lax era of parenting. One person I know, who was parenting in the 70s and 80s, smoked while pregnant and went frantically searching for her 3-year-old when she lost track of her at a party once in the late 70s. She faced no ramifications or public censure at that time, but there is no end to the criticism she doles out about us parents these days!

dialogue:2 personal_story:2

no_non_con:2 provocative:1

no_toxic:2 teasing:1

As an often overprotective mother myself , I wholeheartedly agree with Wentes position here . It bothers me that other people can be so judgemental of parents these days . Its particularly irksome to be given unsolicited advice and unwelcome criticism from people who were parents in a more lax era of parenting . One person I know , who was parenting in the 70s and 80s , smoked while pregnant and went frantically searching for her 3-year-old when she lost track of her at a party once in the late 70s . She faced no ramifications or public censure at that time , but there is no end to the criticism she doles out about us parents these days !

source1_19639369_8

I agree with Margaret. People are very quick with their cellphones and suddenly a justifiable action on the part of the parent is all over the news. It's hard to find that nuanced position.

specific_points:3 evidence:2 solution:1

no_non_con:2 no_respect:1

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1 inflammatory:1 teasing:1 embarrassment:1

I agree with Margaret . People are very quick with their cellphones and suddenly a justifiable action on the part of the parent is all over the news . Its hard to find that nuanced position .

source1_19639369_71

As a parent I couldn't agree more - question is - what can we do to fix this mess? I don't want my kids growing up in a world where they are constantly sheltered until they turn 18. Then I guess suddenly they're on their own without any practice...

specific_points:4 evidence:2 dialogue:2

no_non_con:4 unsubstantial:1

no_toxic:2 abusive:1 personal_attack:1 inflammatory:1 teasing:1

As a parent I couldnt agree more - question is - what can we do to fix this mess ? I dont want my kids growing up in a world where they are constantly sheltered until they turn 18 . Then I guess suddenly theyre on their own without any practice ...

source1_19704906_28

I'm not into anything that leaves wealthier people untouched, sorry. If we have a carbon problem, then do what they did in WWII with gasoline, ration it. As it is now it's lower income people that have to worry about being able to pay the hydro bill so can't afford air conditioning or have to keep the heat to just above freezing in the winter. My in-law makes his money off of the green energy thing, turned him into a multi millionaire, his family walks around in summer tank tops and shorts in January, drive big SUVs, jet everywhere on vacation multiple times a year.

solution:3 specific_points:3 evidence:3 personal_story:2 dialogue:1

no_non_con:4

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1 inflammatory:1 teasing:1 embarrassment:1

Im not into anything that leaves wealthier people untouched , sorry . If we have a carbon problem , then do what they did in WWII with gasoline , ration it . As it is now its lower income people that have to worry about being able to pay the hydro bill so cant afford air conditioning or have to keep the heat to just above freezing in the winter . My in-law makes his money off of the green energy thing , turned him into a multi millionaire , his family walks around in summer tank tops and shorts in January , drive big SUVs , jet everywhere on vacation multiple times a year .

source1_19704906_78

Carbon Tax? Is it better than Carbon Credits? Carbon Tax at the Tarsands level or the pump, or the natural gas pipeline feeding into hydrogen fuel cell plants? Carbon credits makes sense to the wealthy. They can buy them from a remote island and retire there. The rest of us get milked, especially when our government makes no effort at all to reduce the emissions. Politics works in Australia. People have a responsive system when it comes to abuses that threaten our health and agriculture. Something Harper can't and won't act on. He needs to find a job, after 2015.

specific_points:5 evidence:2 dialogue:1

no_non_con:5 no_respect:1

no_toxic:2 teasing:1

Carbon Tax ? Is it better than Carbon Credits ? Carbon Tax at the Tarsands level or the pump , or the natural gas pipeline feeding into hydrogen fuel cell plants ? Carbon credits makes sense to the wealthy . They can buy them from a remote island and retire there . The rest of us get milked , especially when our government makes no effort at all to reduce the emissions . Politics works in Australia . People have a responsive system when it comes to abuses that threaten our health and agriculture . Something Harper cant and wont act on . He needs to find a job , after 2015 .

source1_19704906_91

If you don't believe that the ever increasing carbon concentration in our atmosphere is, and will destroy our environment, then please don't read on. Keep your head in the (tar) sand. Instead, the 60's called, and want your confirmation that cigarettes are good for your health. Do you accept that since 1997 every month of the year has had a new global high temperature? That drought, flooding, polar vortex, super storms, migration of pests northward, reduction in ice caps, and a myriad of other events/trends that 1000's of scientists confirm threaten our health just may be due to the fact that the earth really isn't one big toxic waste site that we can continue to go to dump. If you think carbon is a problem, you will be prepared to pay more in tax or higher priced products, to deal with it. Why would you think we need to wait until all the other countries in the world have sorted out their emissions? Canada will be one of the worst off countries when climate change gets into full swing. Instead we could use our talents to lead the world in innovation.

specific_points:3 solution:1 evidence:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:2 teasing:1

If you dont believe that the ever increasing carbon concentration in our atmosphere is , and will destroy our environment , then please dont read on . Keep your head in the ( tar ) sand . Instead , the 60s called , and want your confirmation that cigarettes are good for your health . Do you accept that since 1997 every month of the year has had a new global high temperature ? That drought , flooding , polar vortex , super storms , migration of pests northward , reduction in ice caps , and a myriad of other events/trends that 1000s of scientists confirm threaten our health just may be due to the fact that the earth really isnt one big toxic waste site that we can continue to go to dump . If you think carbon is a problem , you will be prepared to pay more in tax or higher priced products , to deal with it . Why would you think we need to wait until all the other countries in the world have sorted out their emissions ? Canada will be one of the worst off countries when climate change gets into full swing . Instead we could use our talents to lead the world in innovation .

source1_19704906_61

A carbon tax makes only sense if there is an effort to replace the fossil fuel with a renewable fuel. In BC the carbon tax is a con job as the government bureaucracy actually hinders and delays the installation of renewables and the gutless politicians are unable and unwilling to intervene. Just look to G.B. as an example how taxes and so financed incentive can bring real carbon fuel use reduction. Any country that encourages carbon fuel use reduction is rewarded with new industries, jobs and helps in the global quest. A carbon tax alone is just a tax grab, that's why Australia failed and BC's feeble attempt to give carbon reduction goals is failing.

specific_points:3 solution:2 evidence:1

no_non_con:3

personal_attack:2 teasing:2 embarrassment:2 inflammatory:1 no_toxic:1

A carbon tax makes only sense if there is an effort to replace the fossil fuel with a renewable fuel . In BC the carbon tax is a con job as the government bureaucracy actually hinders and delays the installation of renewables and the gutless politicians are unable and unwilling to intervene . Just look to G.B . as an example how taxes and so financed incentive can bring real carbon fuel use reduction . Any country that encourages carbon fuel use reduction is rewarded with new industries , jobs and helps in the global quest . A carbon tax alone is just a tax grab , thats why Australia failed and BCs feeble attempt to give carbon reduction goals is failing .

source1_19704906_49

British Columbians do not love the carbon tax. It has been a regressive tax for both individuals and companies that use fuel. It has lead to an increase in people in border communities going to Washington State or Alberta to gas up. The people hardest hit by the tax are the working poor who can't afford a newer, more fuel efficient car, never mind the time and mileage to cross the border to fill up.It's been a tax grab from, perhaps ironically, schools and municipalities, who have had to pay for carbon credits out of their funds, which of course all come from taxes, so taxes are paying taxes, which is just ridiculous. Then there is the whole Pacific Carbon Trust fiasco.

specific_points:3

no_non_con:2 unsubstantial:1

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1

British Columbians do not love the carbon tax . It has been a regressive tax for both individuals and companies that use fuel . It has lead to an increase in people in border communities going to Washington State or Alberta to gas up . The people hardest hit by the tax are the working poor who cant afford a newer , more fuel efficient car , never mind the time and mileage to cross the border to fill up.Its been a tax grab from , perhaps ironically , schools and municipalities , who have had to pay for carbon credits out of their funds , which of course all come from taxes , so taxes are paying taxes , which is just ridiculous . Then there is the whole Pacific Carbon Trust fiasco .

source1_11084876_99

Capitalism isn't a dirty word, but it sure does have an ugly side to it.If we as consumers aren't willing to use our capital to influence behavior, then we have no soapbox on which to stand. How many people people complaining about outsourcing, TFW etc. shop at Walmart? How many of you own Nike shoes? If you are upset about corporations leveraging the economic status of other countries, then you need to really evaluate your purchasing decisions. And let me be the first to say, I'm not any better. I've aided and abetted this practice. It can be nearly impossible to find ethically sourced goods, and when you do, you can bet they are much more expensive. You really have to question how committed you are in your beliefs, and what you're willing to give up, because you can't have it all. Not yet anyways.

solution:2 specific_points:2 evidence:1

no_non_con:2 no_respect:1

no_toxic:2 teasing:1

Capitalism isnt a dirty word , but it sure does have an ugly side to it.If we as consumers arent willing to use our capital to influence behavior , then we have no soapbox on which to stand . How many people people complaining about outsourcing , TFW etc . shop at Walmart ? How many of you own Nike shoes ? If you are upset about corporations leveraging the economic status of other countries , then you need to really evaluate your purchasing decisions . And let me be the first to say , Im not any better . Ive aided and abetted this practice . It can be nearly impossible to find ethically sourced goods , and when you do , you can bet they are much more expensive . You really have to question how committed you are in your beliefs , and what youre willing to give up , because you cant have it all . Not yet anyways .

source1_11084876_74

Amanda: 'It's in the DNA of a business to want to grow. To do that, businesses work extremely hard at maximizing efficiency – to pay as little as possible for their cost of production, and get as much as they can for their end product.'Me: So, at $12.6 million per annum, Gord Nixon is the lowest-cost CEO available in the world to run RBC? There isn't a single qualified business executive in India or the Philippines willing to make a competitive bid for the job? LOL!

specific_points:2 dialogue:1

no_non_con:2 unsubstantial:1

no_toxic:2 inflammatory:1 teasing:1 embarrassment:1

Amanda : Its in the DNA of a business to want to grow . To do that , businesses work extremely hard at maximizing efficiency – to pay as little as possible for their cost of production , and get as much as they can for their end product.Me : So , at $ 12.6 million per annum , Gord Nixon is the lowest-cost CEO available in the world to run RBC ? There isnt a single qualified business executive in India or the Philippines willing to make a competitive bid for the job ? LOL !

source1_11084876_6

The words of people such as Amanda Lang threaten the health of democracy. She claims that unfettered capitalism has done more for human prosperity than anything else in history. Regrettably her knowledge is restricted to a small part of the human experience. She isolates business and economics from their social, political, even religious environment. Britain experienced phenomenal economic growth in the 17th and 19th centuries. The economy evolved alongside developments in family and government. The early modern late-marriage family, working and living in a household, stimulated the economy because wives closer in age to their husbands acted as partners and joint decision-makers, not as master and servant. 17th century democratic politics grew out of the need to justify a revolution that cost King Charles his life. The trauma inspired brilliant minds such as John Locke, who explained government as an association of people, who all expected benefits and responsibilities. Everybody had a right to protection from the government, not just the rich and the successful. Government's policies needed to meet the needs of the peasants and worker, not only those of the nobility and the capitalists. Contrary to the narrow perspective of today's capitalists, 18th century England provided Josiah Wedgwood, an inventor, manufacturer and social reformer. He took pride in efficient factory organization as well as the jobs her provided for the working class of England. People such as Lang see only the interests of profits for the entrepreneurs. Democracy works well only insofar as government preserves this organic shared existence. Early modern and Enlightenment England, America and continental Europe authored policies and built government for all the people. The notion of all the people expended in the course of the 19th and 20th centuries. Democracy and freedom will erode if governments ignore the interests of the weak trusting Lang's unsubstantiated assumption that eventually the poor will catch up.

specific_points:6 evidence:3 solution:2 dialogue:2 personal_story:1

no_non_con:7 no_respect:1 provocative:1

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1 inflammatory:1 teasing:1 embarrassment:1

The words of people such as Amanda Lang threaten the health of democracy . She claims that unfettered capitalism has done more for human prosperity than anything else in history . Regrettably her knowledge is restricted to a small part of the human experience . She isolates business and economics from their social , political , even religious environment . Britain experienced phenomenal economic growth in the 17th and 19th centuries . The economy evolved alongside developments in family and government . The early modern late-marriage family , working and living in a household , stimulated the economy because wives closer in age to their husbands acted as partners and joint decision-makers , not as master and servant . 17th century democratic politics grew out of the need to justify a revolution that cost King Charles his life . The trauma inspired brilliant minds such as John Locke , who explained government as an association of people , who all expected benefits and responsibilities . Everybody had a right to protection from the government , not just the rich and the successful . Governments policies needed to meet the needs of the peasants and worker , not only those of the nobility and the capitalists . Contrary to the narrow perspective of todays capitalists , 18th century England provided Josiah Wedgwood , an inventor , manufacturer and social reformer . He took pride in efficient factory organization as well as the jobs her provided for the working class of England . People such as Lang see only the interests of profits for the entrepreneurs . Democracy works well only insofar as government preserves this organic shared existence . Early modern and Enlightenment England , America and continental Europe authored policies and built government for all the people . The notion of all the people expended in the course of the 19th and 20th centuries . Democracy and freedom will erode if governments ignore the interests of the weak trusting Langs unsubstantiated assumption that eventually the poor will catch up .

source1_13201485_91

several efforts have been made....after massive flood damage... to discourage... or even BAN development in flood prone areas......sooner or later... the development creeps in...and ..when the fecal matter hits the circular rotating cooling device.. cries go out for disaster assistance... funded by tax payers , of course. Here is the way to go....publish the already identified areas that have... or likely will be flooded !!Any development in those areas are .....willingly doing so ...without any hope of public disaster assistance... but still must comply with any and all rules and regs... not to mention pay taxes. The property buyer or owner must show that they know that they are developing or buying property that is flood prone.

specific_points:3 personal_story:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:2 abusive:1 personal_attack:1 inflammatory:1 teasing:1

several efforts have been made ... .after massive flood damage ... to discourage ... or even BAN development in flood prone areas ... ... sooner or later ... the development creeps in ... and ..when the fecal matter hits the circular rotating cooling device.. cries go out for disaster assistance ... funded by tax payers , of course . Here is the way to go ... .publish the already identified areas that have ... or likely will be flooded ! ! Any development in those areas are ... ..willingly doing so ... without any hope of public disaster assistance ... but still must comply with any and all rules and regs ... not to mention pay taxes . The property buyer or owner must show that they know that they are developing or buying property that is flood prone .

source1_27403291_0

I find this column to be very strange. Regular readers will know that I am no big cheerleader of the current PM, and that I thought Mulcair was a much stronger and more deserving performer in the debates. But I find this column strange. I find myself actually wanting to defend the Prime Minister. The writer is trying to ascribe some kind of cunning, manipulative intention upon the Prime Minister, as if the PM is some brilliant but diabolical villain who is up to no good, in complex, convoluted ways. Sorry, I do not see it. I may not agree with the PM's timetable or policy, but I think the straightforward analysis is more like accurate: That is, what you see is what you get, a promise made shall be a promise kept. That's it, that is what is going on with the PM and the refugee matter. There is no 'there' there, so to speak - sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. Two other strange things in the column: No, wrong, Canadians do not all see it as 'smooth and banal' and part of the normal 'underlying hum of the country, that it’s barely noticed', having these huge immigration levels we have. Plenty of Canadians actually firmly believe the rates should be cut back. And Europe has troubles with immigration for a reason not mentioned (strangely): Unlike Canada, they do not filter and select for highly intelligent well educated families. That is actually what mainly leads to our success, it is our filtering - it is actually NOT our multicultural-mosaic-kumbaya stuff that makes Canada peaceful and low on violence. It is the smarts of our carefully selected immigrants.

specific_points:3 solution:1 evidence:1

provocative:2 no_non_con:1 sarcastic:1

no_toxic:2 teasing:1

I find this column to be very strange . Regular readers will know that I am no big cheerleader of the current PM , and that I thought Mulcair was a much stronger and more deserving performer in the debates . But I find this column strange . I find myself actually wanting to defend the Prime Minister . The writer is trying to ascribe some kind of cunning , manipulative intention upon the Prime Minister , as if the PM is some brilliant but diabolical villain who is up to no good , in complex , convoluted ways . Sorry , I do not see it . I may not agree with the PMs timetable or policy , but I think the straightforward analysis is more like accurate : That is , what you see is what you get , a promise made shall be a promise kept . Thats it , that is what is going on with the PM and the refugee matter . There is no there there , so to speak - sometimes a cigar is just a cigar . Two other strange things in the column : No , wrong , Canadians do not all see it as smooth and banal and part of the normal underlying hum of the country , that it ’ s barely noticed , having these huge immigration levels we have . Plenty of Canadians actually firmly believe the rates should be cut back . And Europe has troubles with immigration for a reason not mentioned ( strangely ) : Unlike Canada , they do not filter and select for highly intelligent well educated families . That is actually what mainly leads to our success , it is our filtering - it is actually NOT our multicultural-mosaic-kumbaya stuff that makes Canada peaceful and low on violence . It is the smarts of our carefully selected immigrants .

source1_16758865_95

If a majority government can change the rules for elections in Canada over the objections of all other parties and the very loud objections of experts and citizens alike, then why can they not change them in more dramatic ways. For example, how about making it a matter of election law that the only candidate name to appear on the ballot is that of the Conservative candidate. Citizens are free to vote for this candidate or not. The deeper issue here is the process not the content of these changes. If CPC doesn't understand that voting rule changes have to be non-partisan and enjoy broad public support, then it what way are they a democratic party?

specific_points:3 evidence:2 dialogue:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:2 teasing:1

If a majority government can change the rules for elections in Canada over the objections of all other parties and the very loud objections of experts and citizens alike , then why can they not change them in more dramatic ways . For example , how about making it a matter of election law that the only candidate name to appear on the ballot is that of the Conservative candidate . Citizens are free to vote for this candidate or not . The deeper issue here is the process not the content of these changes . If CPC doesnt understand that voting rule changes have to be non-partisan and enjoy broad public support , then it what way are they a democratic party ?

source1_16758865_49

Not a huge fan of Andrew Coyne's neo-liberal economic stance, but to give him credit he HAS been a consistent and vocal critic of Harper's attempts to subvert Canadian democracy and parliamentary process. Ths whole piece (in the NP) is worth a read; compare its tone to the tepid adminishment in this paper.'What’s of interest here is what it reveals of Tory thinking. That is, the problem it was intended to solve would seem to be that the elections investigator was too powerful, too dogged, too independent. This is a nervy position to take for a party that has itself been the frequent subject of Elections Canada investigations — that was indeed found, by that same Federal Court judge, to have done everything it could to thwart the case in front of him, notwithstanding that its own database was used in the fraud. But it fits with the broader Conservative theme, heavily reinforced to its own supporters, that Elections Canada is just another of the seemingly limitless list of agencies, institutions and organizations that are out to get them...'(This last bit is darn-right Fordian. Is that all that neo-cons have left?)Write your conservative MP; tell him him/her to grow a backbone...

specific_points:4 evidence:3 dialogue:3 solution:1 personal_story:1

no_non_con:6

personal_attack:2 no_toxic:1 teasing:1 embarrassment:1

Not a huge fan of Andrew Coynes neo-liberal economic stance , but to give him credit he HAS been a consistent and vocal critic of Harpers attempts to subvert Canadian democracy and parliamentary process . Ths whole piece ( in the NP ) is worth a read ; compare its tone to the tepid adminishment in this paper.What ’ s of interest here is what it reveals of Tory thinking . That is , the problem it was intended to solve would seem to be that the elections investigator was too powerful , too dogged , too independent . This is a nervy position to take for a party that has itself been the frequent subject of Elections Canada investigations — that was indeed found , by that same Federal Court judge , to have done everything it could to thwart the case in front of him , notwithstanding that its own database was used in the fraud . But it fits with the broader Conservative theme , heavily reinforced to its own supporters , that Elections Canada is just another of the seemingly limitless list of agencies , institutions and organizations that are out to get them ... ( This last bit is darn-right Fordian . Is that all that neo-cons have left ? ) Write your conservative MP ; tell him him/her to grow a backbone ...

source1_16758865_75

Should this editorial, specifically exemplified by the last paragraph, represent the overall majority of the Board of Directors sentiments, there may yet be hope for this country's MSM. The G&M's former endorsement of the CPC/Harper government has made me sick - perhaps they've seen the light and critical journalism will, once again, play an active role in educating Canadian citizenry.

specific_points:2 solution:1 dialogue:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1 inflammatory:1 teasing:1 embarrassment:1

Should this editorial , specifically exemplified by the last paragraph , represent the overall majority of the Board of Directors sentiments , there may yet be hope for this countrys MSM . The G & Ms former endorsement of the CPC/Harper government has made me sick - perhaps theyve seen the light and critical journalism will , once again , play an active role in educating Canadian citizenry .

source1_27264082_68

A platoon of Special Forces doesn't constitute anywhere near the 2+ divisions needed to defeat ISIL. Then you have to hold what you captured. Six F-18s are just a drop in the bucket. If they were flying in support of an active military campaign, that would be different. Truth be told, it has to be Muslim/Arab troops but I don't see any country, even Iraqi Shias willing to take them on. Kurds will go a certain distance - perhaps even Mosul because they want the oil. There is no appetite even by the war hungry US Republicans for more body bags. I fear ISIL will not be defeated militarily.

specific_points:2 personal_story:1

no_non_con:2 sarcastic:1

no_toxic:2 teasing:1

A platoon of Special Forces doesnt constitute anywhere near the 2+ divisions needed to defeat ISIL . Then you have to hold what you captured . Six F-18s are just a drop in the bucket . If they were flying in support of an active military campaign , that would be different . Truth be told , it has to be Muslim/Arab troops but I dont see any country , even Iraqi Shias willing to take them on . Kurds will go a certain distance - perhaps even Mosul because they want the oil . There is no appetite even by the war hungry US Republicans for more body bags . I fear ISIL will not be defeated militarily .

source1_27264082_40

If we attacked the cause of all this, it would mean invading and ruthlessly ruling our darlings in the Middle-East.

specific_points:3 evidence:2 solution:1

no_non_con:2 unsubstantial:1

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1 teasing:1 embarrassment:1

If we attacked the cause of all this , it would mean invading and ruthlessly ruling our darlings in the Middle-East .

source1_28705123_24

The current political show that is currently being played out, is becoming a protest vote against the current elite. The dis-function of congress and in particular, the GOP swing to the far right, has allowed the likes of Trump and Cruz to percolate to the surface, with Cruz being the most dangerous of all the candidates. Trump is in the lead because he is giving voice to the 'protest' movement as people feel they have become disenfranchised and feel helpless in the face of the increased power of the elites. Saunders is doing the very same, as the 40's and under are flocking to his support, because they feel the middle class American dream, is no longer attainable. When you have Mitt Romney stating that 47% of Americans pay no federal taxes, what he is saying is that that 47% are impoverished even though they work full time jobs at $8.00 per hours and getting food stamps to maintain basic living standards. This in essence is corporate welfare for the Walmarts of the world, as their employees are on food stamps because they do not receive a basic living wage, all in the persuit of profits. An excellent TVO documentary to view is 'The super rich and Us' which outlines the hollowing out of the middle class, to support the rich elite and the 47% at the bottom. Who bailed out the banks (super rich) but the tax payer and then we are told that we have to cut their taxes even further , yet we are told we will have to cut health benefitsBernie and the Donald are lightening rods for that anger and feeling of helplessness currently being felt by the electorate.

specific_points:2 personal_story:1

no_non_con:2 provocative:1

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1 inflammatory:1 teasing:1 embarrassment:1

The current political show that is currently being played out , is becoming a protest vote against the current elite . The dis-function of congress and in particular , the GOP swing to the far right , has allowed the likes of Trump and Cruz to percolate to the surface , with Cruz being the most dangerous of all the candidates . Trump is in the lead because he is giving voice to the protest movement as people feel they have become disenfranchised and feel helpless in the face of the increased power of the elites . Saunders is doing the very same , as the 40s and under are flocking to his support , because they feel the middle class American dream , is no longer attainable . When you have Mitt Romney stating that 47 % of Americans pay no federal taxes , what he is saying is that that 47 % are impoverished even though they work full time jobs at $ 8.00 per hours and getting food stamps to maintain basic living standards . This in essence is corporate welfare for the Walmarts of the world , as their employees are on food stamps because they do not receive a basic living wage , all in the persuit of profits . An excellent TVO documentary to view is The super rich and Us which outlines the hollowing out of the middle class , to support the rich elite and the 47 % at the bottom . Who bailed out the banks ( super rich ) but the tax payer and then we are told that we have to cut their taxes even further , yet we are told we will have to cut health benefitsBernie and the Donald are lightening rods for that anger and feeling of helplessness currently being felt by the electorate .

source1_19704906_83

To say “most Canadians are not nearly as enlightened as they (BC) are” is false. It is reporters like Ms Wente who are not explaining that a carbon tax is 'job creating' when the revenue is returned to the public and not into government coffers. There are reports in the public realm which support this. The latest is by well recognized Regional Economic Modeling, Inc. (REMI). Their report shows 2.1 million jobs would be created with a steadily rising fee on carbon over 10 years, with revenue recycled to households. Emissions would be reduced by 33 per cent, 13,000 lives would be saved and the GDP would increase by $85 billion. The report can be viewed on Citizens Climate Lobby. org. Canadians can understand this very clearly. It first takes journalists who understand, then report it in their articles.

specific_points:3 evidence:2

no_non_con:2 provocative:1

no_toxic:3 teasing:1

To say “ most Canadians are not nearly as enlightened as they ( BC ) are ” is false . It is reporters like Ms Wente who are not explaining that a carbon tax is job creating when the revenue is returned to the public and not into government coffers . There are reports in the public realm which support this . The latest is by well recognized Regional Economic Modeling , Inc. ( REMI ) . Their report shows 2.1 million jobs would be created with a steadily rising fee on carbon over 10 years , with revenue recycled to households . Emissions would be reduced by 33 per cent , 13,000 lives would be saved and the GDP would increase by $ 85 billion . The report can be viewed on Citizens Climate Lobby . org . Canadians can understand this very clearly . It first takes journalists who understand , then report it in their articles .

source1_32163847_46

When the Globe & Mail could find out Canada's Minister for Democratic Institutions Maryam Monsef was born in Iran, why couldn't the Canadian federal government and Canadian immigration officials? It seems to raise some questions about whether the Canadian immigration screening and vetting process for refugees is sufficiently thorough. It seems to raise some questions about whether the screening and vetting process for federal Cabinet ministers is sufficiently thorough. Does the government of Afghanistan say Maryam Monsef is a citizen of Afghanistan?

specific_points:3 dialogue:2 evidence:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

When the Globe & Mail could find out Canadas Minister for Democratic Institutions Maryam Monsef was born in Iran , why couldnt the Canadian federal government and Canadian immigration officials ? It seems to raise some questions about whether the Canadian immigration screening and vetting process for refugees is sufficiently thorough . It seems to raise some questions about whether the screening and vetting process for federal Cabinet ministers is sufficiently thorough . Does the government of Afghanistan say Maryam Monsef is a citizen of Afghanistan ?

source1_32163847_87

Lots pf people who lived on the Russia Poland border were surprised after the Soviet Union fell to find out where they had actually been born when parents spilled the beans. This happens a lot in zones of oppression or conflict.

specific_points:2 dialogue:2 evidence:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

Lots pf people who lived on the Russia Poland border were surprised after the Soviet Union fell to find out where they had actually been born when parents spilled the beans . This happens a lot in zones of oppression or conflict .

source1_32163847_2

Deflections and obfuscation, that's what this article consists of. It's not about Monsef's actual place of birth. Rather it is a legitimate question - in light of mounting evidence - of whether she deliberately lied about her place of birth in order to perpetuate a specific narrative about her life and further her political ambitions. It is also a question of whether she deliberately lied about her place of birth while taking certain solemn oaths to this nation. The Obama birther issue is completely different because there never was any evidence to begin with that he was born somewhere other than Hawaii, so the 'birthers' were essentially just making accusations from thin air without merit. That is not the case with Monsef's critics.

specific_points:3 dialogue:2

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

Deflections and obfuscation , thats what this article consists of . Its not about Monsefs actual place of birth . Rather it is a legitimate question - in light of mounting evidence - of whether she deliberately lied about her place of birth in order to perpetuate a specific narrative about her life and further her political ambitions . It is also a question of whether she deliberately lied about her place of birth while taking certain solemn oaths to this nation . The Obama birther issue is completely different because there never was any evidence to begin with that he was born somewhere other than Hawaii , so the birthers were essentially just making accusations from thin air without merit . That is not the case with Monsefs critics .

source1_32163847_7

Ludicrous. First, this is what happens now in politics: the opposition hammers the government on things that have very little to do with anything. The Liberals did it to the Tories and now the Tories will do it to the Liberals. Another manifestation of the overall diminishment of our political process. Second, and others have pointed this out, is that the birther movement alleges President Obama was not born in the US which would preclude him from being POTUS. This is a question of which foreign country Ms Monsef happened to be born in. In the Obama case it was tinfoil hat stuff with constitutional consequences. In the Monsef case its simply banal. Finally, this article is actually really depressing because it is clear that the author and some other fellow travellers to compare this to the Birther mess because Canada lacks sufficient home-grown scandal. A hackneyed version of putting words in peoples' mouths then calling them out for it.

specific_points:3 dialogue:2

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

Ludicrous . First , this is what happens now in politics : the opposition hammers the government on things that have very little to do with anything . The Liberals did it to the Tories and now the Tories will do it to the Liberals . Another manifestation of the overall diminishment of our political process . Second , and others have pointed this out , is that the birther movement alleges President Obama was not born in the US which would preclude him from being POTUS . This is a question of which foreign country Ms Monsef happened to be born in . In the Obama case it was tinfoil hat stuff with constitutional consequences . In the Monsef case its simply banal . Finally , this article is actually really depressing because it is clear that the author and some other fellow travellers to compare this to the Birther mess because Canada lacks sufficient home-grown scandal . A hackneyed version of putting words in peoples mouths then calling them out for it .

source1_26023945_89

Right, Mr Simpson. Nobody who writes for the G&M ever goes over the top on the Harper bashing. Our betters like Tabitha Southey and Elizabeth Renzetti get the vapors over anything that Mr Harper does, but never espouse any left-wing bias against him. Got it.

specific_points:3 dialogue:2

no_non_con:2 sarcastic:1

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1

Right , Mr Simpson . Nobody who writes for the G & M ever goes over the top on the Harper bashing . Our betters like Tabitha Southey and Elizabeth Renzetti get the vapors over anything that Mr Harper does , but never espouse any left-wing bias against him . Got it .

source1_26023945_14

The comments here demonstrate that Conservative supporters consider anything other than unending cheering for the PM is bias. I can't wait for the 'An Act Respecting Responsible Media' to be introduced in the event of a Tory majority. Each newsroom will have a monitor appointed by the government to review all editorial content. Margaret and Ibbitson will be the main competitors for the position as Director of the program.

specific_points:2 dialogue:2 evidence:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

The comments here demonstrate that Conservative supporters consider anything other than unending cheering for the PM is bias . I cant wait for the An Act Respecting Responsible Media to be introduced in the event of a Tory majority . Each newsroom will have a monitor appointed by the government to review all editorial content . Margaret and Ibbitson will be the main competitors for the position as Director of the program .

source1_26023945_34

The laughable part is that the mainstream media outlets are generally conservative since the media outlets are pretty much all owned by big corporations. The Globe and Mail's editorial board has consistently endorsed the Harper government in election after election, DESPITE past abuses that have included prorogation, contempt of parliament, document tampering (the Bev Oda affair), the lies about the cost of the F-35 fighter jets, the turning of nine years of budget surpluses into nine years of budget deficits, the Dimitri Soudas scandal involving a former communications director for Harper ......The list of incidents of power abuses, contempt and scandals has been piling up over the course of nearly a decade now ... and yet, the Globe editorial board has steadfastly supported Harper and probably will again. (I would almost faint if it endorsed anyone else.)Same with the National Post and many other newspapers across the country. It could be argued that the TO Star and the CBC are somewhat more liberal, but they too cater to corporate agendas. So it's a bit of a joke that the Conservative Party is begging for money on the basis of having to fight a 'left wing' media. The only truly left-wing media are maybe some of the online sites like Rabble. ca but they have very little money and small audiences.

specific_points:3 dialogue:2 personal_story:1 evidence:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

The laughable part is that the mainstream media outlets are generally conservative since the media outlets are pretty much all owned by big corporations . The Globe and Mails editorial board has consistently endorsed the Harper government in election after election , DESPITE past abuses that have included prorogation , contempt of parliament , document tampering ( the Bev Oda affair ) , the lies about the cost of the F-35 fighter jets , the turning of nine years of budget surpluses into nine years of budget deficits , the Dimitri Soudas scandal involving a former communications director for Harper ... ... The list of incidents of power abuses , contempt and scandals has been piling up over the course of nearly a decade now ... and yet , the Globe editorial board has steadfastly supported Harper and probably will again . ( I would almost faint if it endorsed anyone else . ) Same with the National Post and many other newspapers across the country . It could be argued that the TO Star and the CBC are somewhat more liberal , but they too cater to corporate agendas . So its a bit of a joke that the Conservative Party is begging for money on the basis of having to fight a left wing media . The only truly left-wing media are maybe some of the online sites like Rabble . ca but they have very little money and small audiences .

source2_33444228_54

It's racism in its most pernicious form, clothed in the self-indulgence of victimhood, and it needs to dragged into the light and called what it is. 'I'm the more perfect victim because my genes aren't contaminated.'Unfortunately, we have in Canada a small industry built on the base of perpetuating victimhood eternally and demanding never-ending reparations. I suppose whoever is closest to the genetic centre will receive a preferential portion of the spoils.

specific_points:3 dialogue:2 solution:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

Its racism in its most pernicious form , clothed in the self-indulgence of victimhood , and it needs to dragged into the light and called what it is . Im the more perfect victim because my genes arent contaminated.Unfortunately , we have in Canada a small industry built on the base of perpetuating victimhood eternally and demanding never-ending reparations . I suppose whoever is closest to the genetic centre will receive a preferential portion of the spoils .

source2_33444228_44

My Father was in the WW2 with some Indians friends (I try not to use the I word anymore). Our family leasedland on their reserve and built a cottage. Our parents are gone but we're still there. We have a few years left on a 50 year lease which we a trying to extend. We leased the land off an individual not the band. We have alwaysbeen treated fairly. I find most of the comments here, either outright racist or with a hidden racist undertone. Most of the commenters only see the radical element, not the underlying quality and warmth of the people. I find that Native people are like a huge family united in a mutual struggle; Grievances are a by-product.Although there are two groups on the reserve: Native and Non-Native; there is a lot less racism than you wouldassume. On this reserve many Non-Natives are family members. The most racist people I have encountered on this reserve were visitors who abused the hospitality they were so graciously given.

specific_points:2 dialogue:2 personal_story:2

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

My Father was in the WW2 with some Indians friends ( I try not to use the I word anymore ) . Our family leasedland on their reserve and built a cottage . Our parents are gone but were still there . We have a few years left on a 50 year lease which we a trying to extend . We leased the land off an individual not the band . We have alwaysbeen treated fairly . I find most of the comments here , either outright racist or with a hidden racist undertone . Most of the commenters only see the radical element , not the underlying quality and warmth of the people . I find that Native people are like a huge family united in a mutual struggle ; Grievances are a by-product.Although there are two groups on the reserve : Native and Non-Native ; there is a lot less racism than you wouldassume . On this reserve many Non-Natives are family members . The most racist people I have encountered on this reserve were visitors who abused the hospitality they were so graciously given .

source2_33444228_88

Hayden King, one of those practicing identity politics, thinks that Boyden is suppressing struggling indigenous artists. I would argue that he is actually raising awareness of them. His books are very well written with captivating plots and very human characters. Three Day Road and Through Black Spruce are books that draw attention to injustices suffered by First Nations People in two different eras. The Orenda is a snap shot of life in Canada 400 years ago and chronicles a culture under siege by the Iroquois Nation and the first hints of the European invasion in the form of a Jesuit missionary. I would think that few people who enjoyed these books care what the author identifies as but all definitely gain a richer knowledge of North American aboriginal history and issues that haunt many today. Without authors like Boyden, First Nations culture and proud history will fade into obscurity and will be replaced by Identity politics and other petty complaints.

specific_points:3 dialogue:2 solution:1 evidence:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

Hayden King , one of those practicing identity politics , thinks that Boyden is suppressing struggling indigenous artists . I would argue that he is actually raising awareness of them . His books are very well written with captivating plots and very human characters . Three Day Road and Through Black Spruce are books that draw attention to injustices suffered by First Nations People in two different eras . The Orenda is a snap shot of life in Canada 400 years ago and chronicles a culture under siege by the Iroquois Nation and the first hints of the European invasion in the form of a Jesuit missionary . I would think that few people who enjoyed these books care what the author identifies as but all definitely gain a richer knowledge of North American aboriginal history and issues that haunt many today . Without authors like Boyden , First Nations culture and proud history will fade into obscurity and will be replaced by Identity politics and other petty complaints .

source2_33444228_80

Very great idea not including the vast array and sources of criticism towards Boyden's work or use of a FN identity. His description and identifying as 'two-spirit' alone renders this article wrong on the point of his sincerity. Somehow in the vast amount of research he has done into aboriginal culture and history he has missed key important identities and information.

specific_points:3 dialogue:2

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

Very great idea not including the vast array and sources of criticism towards Boydens work or use of a FN identity . His description and identifying as two-spirit alone renders this article wrong on the point of his sincerity . Somehow in the vast amount of research he has done into aboriginal culture and history he has missed key important identities and information .

source1_28920847_5

It would have been a more interesting read if Manning had admitted that neither of the alternative leaders would be presenting a balanced budget had they won last October. By 'betting the farm' on Alberta oil at the expense of promoting innovation in green energy, Harper put Canada in a position where no one, not even him, could deliver a balanced budget.

specific_points:3 dialogue:2

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

It would have been a more interesting read if Manning had admitted that neither of the alternative leaders would be presenting a balanced budget had they won last October . By betting the farm on Alberta oil at the expense of promoting innovation in green energy , Harper put Canada in a position where no one , not even him , could deliver a balanced budget .

source1_27865553_84

Be thankful it's only money, just billions of dollars Wynne is wasting. Humans have taken blame for climate change since the beginning of recorded history. The ancient Greeks often dealt with climate change and even the weather by offering human sacrifices. Our native Americans danced and also offered human sacrifices. Europeans as recently as a few hundred years ago used witchcraft and human sacrifices, including witches, to deal with climate change. Thank goodness Wynne is not into human sacrifice or witchcraft yet. Well, Paris conference was sorta like a rain dance - no offence intended- no lives lost. just dollars.

specific_points:3 dialogue:2 evidence:1

no_non_con:2 sarcastic:1

no_toxic:3

Be thankful its only money , just billions of dollars Wynne is wasting . Humans have taken blame for climate change since the beginning of recorded history . The ancient Greeks often dealt with climate change and even the weather by offering human sacrifices . Our native Americans danced and also offered human sacrifices . Europeans as recently as a few hundred years ago used witchcraft and human sacrifices , including witches , to deal with climate change . Thank goodness Wynne is not into human sacrifice or witchcraft yet . Well , Paris conference was sorta like a rain dance - no offence intended- no lives lost . just dollars .

source1_27865553_117

Normally, when I read something from the Canadian Taxpayers' Federation, I immediately discount it. I know their biases and know what their take on any given issue will turn out to be. On this one, though, I've got to say I think she's pretty much bang-on. The Wynne government is not taking prudent care of our finances. So far, I'm less than impressed. In our rush to hasten Hudak's departure from politics, we gave majority government to a group of people without enough competence to manage it well. Don't get me wrong, Hudak was unelectable by any rational standard. Minority government would have been much better for the province.

specific_points:3 dialogue:2

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

Normally , when I read something from the Canadian Taxpayers Federation , I immediately discount it . I know their biases and know what their take on any given issue will turn out to be . On this one , though , Ive got to say I think shes pretty much bang-on . The Wynne government is not taking prudent care of our finances . So far , Im less than impressed . In our rush to hasten Hudaks departure from politics , we gave majority government to a group of people without enough competence to manage it well . Dont get me wrong , Hudak was unelectable by any rational standard . Minority government would have been much better for the province .

source1_28775443_56

What credentials and where do they come from? who issues them? You can't possibly accommodate the whole herd of people who call themselves 'media' today, thanks to the Internet. Someone needs to look at this question and come up with an answer for all governments. Sounds like the Alberta NDP plan to do just that: maybe you should all get on board and make a decision that is followed across the country.

specific_points:3 dialogue:2 solution:1 evidence:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

What credentials and where do they come from ? who issues them ? You cant possibly accommodate the whole herd of people who call themselves media today , thanks to the Internet . Someone needs to look at this question and come up with an answer for all governments . Sounds like the Alberta NDP plan to do just that : maybe you should all get on board and make a decision that is followed across the country .

source1_28775443_30

Anyone going into Canadian Politics knows full well that along with any office comes mud slinging. This has gone on forever. The internet has changed the news media landscape forever and yes blogs, youtube are now part of the media. No need for a TV Station or newspaper. Notley should not be trying to judge who is media and who isn't just because they criticize her and one thing for sure is the mud will still fly.

specific_points:3 dialogue:2 solution:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

Anyone going into Canadian Politics knows full well that along with any office comes mud slinging . This has gone on forever . The internet has changed the news media landscape forever and yes blogs , youtube are now part of the media . No need for a TV Station or newspaper . Notley should not be trying to judge who is media and who isnt just because they criticize her and one thing for sure is the mud will still fly .

source1_11484180_87

The need to look for the 'root causes' of terrorism attacks is obvious. No one disputes that this is necessary, that we need to understand the when, where, who, why, how. This was not Justin's point, however. He said: 'But there is no question that this happened because there is someone who feels completely excluded. Completely at war with innocents. At war with a society. And our approach has to be, where do those tensions come from?'This simplistic, reductionist, naive and frankly, ignorant statement shows how out of his depth Justin is. The recent attackers in the United States were not socially excluded; they were integrated, went to university, and the elder brother had even married an American and had a child. Similarly the prototypical terrorists such as Al Qaeda are often wealthy, educated, and come from the middle or upper classes in their society. Aside from the rare Unabomber-type, social exclusion is not even a factor, much less the root cause. It was almost surreal to hear this know-it-all Liberal opinion before the attackers were even caught. This is the problem with a party leader who doesn't have any experience nor apparently the ability to analyse and understand complex issues. Liberals say that it's OK that Justin has never formulated any legislation and doesn't have any formulated policy positions; that he can make it up as he goes along. No, it's not OK, because you can't run a party, much less a country, with such a lack of understanding of basic issues and the ability to analyze problems and issues.

specific_points:2 evidence:2 personal_story:1 dialogue:1 solution:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3 abusive:1 personal_attack:1 inflammatory:1 teasing:1 embarrassment:1

The need to look for the root causes of terrorism attacks is obvious . No one disputes that this is necessary , that we need to understand the when , where , who , why , how . This was not Justins point , however . He said : But there is no question that this happened because there is someone who feels completely excluded . Completely at war with innocents . At war with a society . And our approach has to be , where do those tensions come from ? This simplistic , reductionist , naive and frankly , ignorant statement shows how out of his depth Justin is . The recent attackers in the United States were not socially excluded ; they were integrated , went to university , and the elder brother had even married an American and had a child . Similarly the prototypical terrorists such as Al Qaeda are often wealthy , educated , and come from the middle or upper classes in their society . Aside from the rare Unabomber-type , social exclusion is not even a factor , much less the root cause . It was almost surreal to hear this know-it-all Liberal opinion before the attackers were even caught . This is the problem with a party leader who doesnt have any experience nor apparently the ability to analyse and understand complex issues . Liberals say that its OK that Justin has never formulated any legislation and doesnt have any formulated policy positions ; that he can make it up as he goes along . No , its not OK , because you cant run a party , much less a country , with such a lack of understanding of basic issues and the ability to analyze problems and issues .

source1_11484180_89

Kingsley10: 13 AM on April 23, 2013My sense is that these so-called gaffs registered far higher on your radar than they did with voters.---------------...seems so?...CBC-Navigator-Jaime Watt(Conservative)-Political Traction-Justin Trudeau-Ottawa-45%-Canada-14%...cbc.ca/player/News/Politics/ID/2381187130/

specific_points:2 evidence:1

no_non_con:2 provocative:1

no_toxic:2 abusive:1 personal_attack:1 inflammatory:1 teasing:1

Kingsley10 : 13 AM on April 23 , 2013My sense is that these so-called gaffs registered far higher on your radar than they did with voters. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - ... seems so ? ... CBC-Navigator-Jaime Watt ( Conservative ) -Political Traction-Justin Trudeau-Ottawa-45 % -Canada-14 % ... cbc.ca/player/News/Politics/ID/2381187130/

source1_21959702_72

I've always had friends younger than me. Had my daughter when I was 40. For past 20 years my best friends are about 7 to 10 years younger and they have never made me feel older than them. When they start talking about how it feels to get old, I just smile. I don't say I told you so.....because everyone will get there. I'm 60 but don't look it. In fact I've never looked my age. I still had to show proof of age at 32 in a bar. Good genes in my family (both sides). My dad is 86 but doesnt look any older than 75 and he still plays hockey once a week, stakes 3x's a week and golfs 2 or 3 times a week (arizona here we come). Embrace whatever age you are as it will bring happiness to you and keep you young at 'heart'.

personal_story:2 specific_points:2 solution:1 evidence:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

Ive always had friends younger than me . Had my daughter when I was 40 . For past 20 years my best friends are about 7 to 10 years younger and they have never made me feel older than them . When they start talking about how it feels to get old , I just smile . I dont say I told you so ... ..because everyone will get there . Im 60 but dont look it . In fact Ive never looked my age . I still had to show proof of age at 32 in a bar . Good genes in my family ( both sides ) . My dad is 86 but doesnt look any older than 75 and he still plays hockey once a week , stakes 3xs a week and golfs 2 or 3 times a week ( arizona here we come ) . Embrace whatever age you are as it will bring happiness to you and keep you young at heart .

source1_17357856_72

We need to accept that there is an element of Quebec society that will always pine for their own country. Canada will never be able to appease these folks because of the emotional aspect of those feelings. These folks cannot be bought. In many ways you have to admire their commitment and perseverance. Not every one within the rest of Canada is happy with the country either. There is a small but growing republicanism movement for example. At some point these folks might force a referendum on that issue. The PQ may have many objectionable policies but at the end of the day, it is up to the people of Quebec to accept or reject those policies. Whatever they might be, those policies only affect the people of Quebec. One area that the other provinces should have input on however, is the area of equalization payments, because those payments do affect everyone. Maybe Canada should establish an entity similar to the IMF that can go into a province that is constantly at the equalization trough, and Quebec is not alone, and specify measures that should be taken to eliminate the need to be subsidized. The era of free lunches has passed. At the end of the day, if Quebec ever votes to separate, we should let them go but not with the same borders because if Canada is divisible, so is Quebec and there are enough Canadians within Quebec that would like to remain in Canada who should not have to be sacrificed.

specific_points:4 solution:2 evidence:1 no_con:1

no_non_con:4 sarcastic:1 unsubstantial:1

no_toxic:3

We need to accept that there is an element of Quebec society that will always pine for their own country . Canada will never be able to appease these folks because of the emotional aspect of those feelings . These folks can not be bought . In many ways you have to admire their commitment and perseverance . Not every one within the rest of Canada is happy with the country either . There is a small but growing republicanism movement for example . At some point these folks might force a referendum on that issue . The PQ may have many objectionable policies but at the end of the day , it is up to the people of Quebec to accept or reject those policies . Whatever they might be , those policies only affect the people of Quebec . One area that the other provinces should have input on however , is the area of equalization payments , because those payments do affect everyone . Maybe Canada should establish an entity similar to the IMF that can go into a province that is constantly at the equalization trough , and Quebec is not alone , and specify measures that should be taken to eliminate the need to be subsidized . The era of free lunches has passed . At the end of the day , if Quebec ever votes to separate , we should let them go but not with the same borders because if Canada is divisible , so is Quebec and there are enough Canadians within Quebec that would like to remain in Canada who should not have to be sacrificed .

source1_17357856_47

Let Quebec go, they may become another Sweden, but keep the land below the St.Lawrence in Canada. That maintains our road, rail and air rights of way, and it is Quebec, not Canada, that must ask themselves if partitioning is right for them.

solution:1 specific_points:1 evidence:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

Let Quebec go , they may become another Sweden , but keep the land below the St.Lawrence in Canada . That maintains our road , rail and air rights of way , and it is Quebec , not Canada , that must ask themselves if partitioning is right for them .

source1_17357856_104

They should have a referendum subject to the rest of the Canadian people through their federal Government are consulted on the question with the understanding that should Quebec votes to separate they are obligated to pay their share of the debt, no Canadian dollar or passport, Access to the St. Laurence seaway and to Eastern Canada. Good luck to them, Cannot wait to see them conduct business with the rest of the World in French.

specific_points:4 solution:2 evidence:1

no_non_con:4

no_toxic:3

They should have a referendum subject to the rest of the Canadian people through their federal Government are consulted on the question with the understanding that should Quebec votes to separate they are obligated to pay their share of the debt , no Canadian dollar or passport , Access to the St. Laurence seaway and to Eastern Canada . Good luck to them , Can not wait to see them conduct business with the rest of the World in French .

source1_17357856_127

The ROC should weigh their response to any separatist demands or actions very carefully. While more than 350K taxpayers left Quebec between 1977 and 1982 to join the ROC, the PQ was cobbling together the foundation for the political fortress that will, always, leave them in a position of power against the ROC. Their biggest ally in the political war against the ROC came in the form of Brian Mulroney. His covert efforts to bolster Quebec's war chest made inroads while the ROC was squawking. In 1991 the biggest piece was put in place when Mulroney appointed Marcel Masse Minister of Defense. In his two year tenure, he managed to transfer all the Armed Forces supply chain to the military base here in east end Montreal. Anything the military requires for their troops has to come from or through Montreal. The Liberals bellowed they would change that but never did and Harper is to busy selling our future to corporate big wigs to care. To my knowledge, based on acquaintances of mine in the Armed Forces, this coup d'état remains Mulroney's biggest legacy among separatists and nothing has changed. To coin an American standard, the person holding the gun makes the rules; in this case, it's Quebec.

dialogue:2 solution:1 specific_points:1 personal_story:1

no_non_con:2 provocative:1

no_toxic:3

The ROC should weigh their response to any separatist demands or actions very carefully . While more than 350K taxpayers left Quebec between 1977 and 1982 to join the ROC , the PQ was cobbling together the foundation for the political fortress that will , always , leave them in a position of power against the ROC . Their biggest ally in the political war against the ROC came in the form of Brian Mulroney . His covert efforts to bolster Quebecs war chest made inroads while the ROC was squawking . In 1991 the biggest piece was put in place when Mulroney appointed Marcel Masse Minister of Defense . In his two year tenure , he managed to transfer all the Armed Forces supply chain to the military base here in east end Montreal . Anything the military requires for their troops has to come from or through Montreal . The Liberals bellowed they would change that but never did and Harper is to busy selling our future to corporate big wigs to care . To my knowledge , based on acquaintances of mine in the Armed Forces , this coup détat remains Mulroneys biggest legacy among separatists and nothing has changed . To coin an American standard , the person holding the gun makes the rules ; in this case , its Quebec .

source1_17357856_177

With all his misachievements and misadventures, Harper may go down in history as the PM who lost Quebec. If we can imagine a UK without Scotland this September, than a Canada without Quebec in 2015 is not far fetched. Tough choices indeed. Would Canada allow C$ to remain currency in Quebec? Would Canada demand the return of Ungava? The claim will sound hollow if Canadian sentiment today is for Ukraine not return south and east back to Russia after 50 years. Would Canada demand a narrow passage to the East, or keep Eastern Townships for itself? Would Canada demand West Island to separate from Quebec? The 20th century colonial history is hypocritical at best – divide and rule. Ireland, India, Palestine. The UN that was created to unite the nations blotted its plate by creating new nations. But what goes around, comes around. Sins of past come back to haunt.

specific_points:4 evidence:3 dialogue:2 solution:1

no_non_con:6

no_toxic:3

With all his misachievements and misadventures , Harper may go down in history as the PM who lost Quebec . If we can imagine a UK without Scotland this September , than a Canada without Quebec in 2015 is not far fetched . Tough choices indeed . Would Canada allow C $ to remain currency in Quebec ? Would Canada demand the return of Ungava ? The claim will sound hollow if Canadian sentiment today is for Ukraine not return south and east back to Russia after 50 years . Would Canada demand a narrow passage to the East , or keep Eastern Townships for itself ? Would Canada demand West Island to separate from Quebec ? The 20th century colonial history is hypocritical at best – divide and rule . Ireland , India , Palestine . The UN that was created to unite the nations blotted its plate by creating new nations . But what goes around , comes around . Sins of past come back to haunt .

source1_27072545_81

This article seems to posit that the rejection of the Harper government was based on emotion (vindictiveness) rather than logic. That seems to be the prevailing view expressed in conservative analysis of the election results e.g. we used the wrong tone. If that view proves to be the dominant view within the party it will be hard for them to make the changes necessary to return them to power in 4 years.

specific_points:5 dialogue:3 solution:2 evidence:1

no_non_con:6 provocative:2

no_toxic:3

This article seems to posit that the rejection of the Harper government was based on emotion ( vindictiveness ) rather than logic . That seems to be the prevailing view expressed in conservative analysis of the election results e.g . we used the wrong tone . If that view proves to be the dominant view within the party it will be hard for them to make the changes necessary to return them to power in 4 years .

source1_27072545_181

There are many promises resulting in many expectations. Many of those promises will not survive the first contact with reality. It's better to follow through on a few important areas and do it really well, rather than try to deliver everything and do a poor job of it.

specific_points:3 evidence:2 solution:2

no_non_con:4

no_toxic:3

There are many promises resulting in many expectations . Many of those promises will not survive the first contact with reality . Its better to follow through on a few important areas and do it really well , rather than try to deliver everything and do a poor job of it .

source1_27072545_175

While I agree post-partisanship is a marketing ploy, the fact is that all political messaging falls into the same bucket, and the timing of its use is dictated by circumstances. As for the 'the smiling face of vindictiveness', it is worthy to note that Trudeau explicitly stated '...conservatives are not our enemies, but our neighbors', and the Republicans have upheld their pledge not to cooperate with Obama under any terms during his presidency. There is constituency on either side of the divide whose allegiance to a party is paramount because they do not believe another party could ever represent them. Those of us who are open to new and different ideas wherever they come from tend to tip the balance in Canadian elections. I did not vote for either Conservatives or Liberals, but I was personally drawn to the positive rather than negative messaging. In the end, my vote was based on the policy choices made by the outgoing Conservative government. When a government piles on $180 billion in new debt over a 7 year period, it is rather odd they would campaign against such as ruinous and catastrophic.

specific_points:5 evidence:4 dialogue:2 personal_story:2

no_non_con:5 provocative:2

no_toxic:3

While I agree post-partisanship is a marketing ploy , the fact is that all political messaging falls into the same bucket , and the timing of its use is dictated by circumstances . As for the the smiling face of vindictiveness , it is worthy to note that Trudeau explicitly stated ... conservatives are not our enemies , but our neighbors , and the Republicans have upheld their pledge not to cooperate with Obama under any terms during his presidency . There is constituency on either side of the divide whose allegiance to a party is paramount because they do not believe another party could ever represent them . Those of us who are open to new and different ideas wherever they come from tend to tip the balance in Canadian elections . I did not vote for either Conservatives or Liberals , but I was personally drawn to the positive rather than negative messaging . In the end , my vote was based on the policy choices made by the outgoing Conservative government . When a government piles on $ 180 billion in new debt over a 7 year period , it is rather odd they would campaign against such as ruinous and catastrophic .

source1_26535259_30

Self regulation is one of those myths that free market types like to promote. If you don't back up regulations with regular checks and penalties for non-compliance, companies will cheat. That's human nature. As well as the financial penalties, there should be some criminal charges and jail time for the VW team responsible.

specific_points:2 dialogue:1 solution:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

Self regulation is one of those myths that free market types like to promote . If you dont back up regulations with regular checks and penalties for non-compliance , companies will cheat . Thats human nature . As well as the financial penalties , there should be some criminal charges and jail time for the VW team responsible .

source1_29717540_15

Margaret states that 'Agriculture has always been the greatest destroyer of nature' I have to disagree with this statement. Development is the actually greatest destroyer of nature. Nature can still flourish on the farm but I don't see much of it when I visit cities overrun with concrete, cars and people.

personal_story:1 dialogue:1 evidence:1 solution:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1

Margaret states that Agriculture has always been the greatest destroyer of nature I have to disagree with this statement . Development is the actually greatest destroyer of nature . Nature can still flourish on the farm but I dont see much of it when I visit cities overrun with concrete , cars and people .

source1_29287461_102

I do not support Trump but there is a good chance you will have to eat this column because Trump is tapping into the distrust of the disenfranchised 55% who did not vote in the last federal election in 2012 and who seem to be coming out in droves now. And he is masterful at searing his powerful slogans and messages into their memory, especially after CNN spams them all over the universe the next day ('Trump says riots possible if nomination not received at party convention'). God help us all.

specific_points:2 evidence:1 personal_story:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

I do not support Trump but there is a good chance you will have to eat this column because Trump is tapping into the distrust of the disenfranchised 55 % who did not vote in the last federal election in 2012 and who seem to be coming out in droves now . And he is masterful at searing his powerful slogans and messages into their memory , especially after CNN spams them all over the universe the next day ( Trump says riots possible if nomination not received at party convention ) . God help us all .

source2_8996700_83

Lest anyone thinks that censorship is restricted to the Harper government, please note that any Ontario civil servant has to get permission from the PR people to speak to the press. When I worked in the Ontario Public Service, I had to send a press contact report to the Communications Branch indicating who had requested contact, the nature of the question and the proposed response. As always, the responses had to parrot the government's line. Let's just say that our political masters, no matter the party in power, want to shape the responses to their political advantage.

specific_points:2 solution:1 evidence:1 personal_story:1

no_non_con:2 provocative:1

no_toxic:3

Lest anyone thinks that censorship is restricted to the Harper government , please note that any Ontario civil servant has to get permission from the PR people to speak to the press . When I worked in the Ontario Public Service , I had to send a press contact report to the Communications Branch indicating who had requested contact , the nature of the question and the proposed response . As always , the responses had to parrot the governments line . Lets just say that our political masters , no matter the party in power , want to shape the responses to their political advantage .

source1_25836587_100

Gosh do i get a prize. I really respect Jeffrey Simpson for his writing skills, his knowledge, his wit, and besides hes hot hot hot. Babe magnet. But there is one mistake. In your article. hire me as your fact checker. your article mentions moderate republicans like Gaylord Nelson. Well es wrong Mr. Simpson. Gaylord Anton Nelson (June 4, 1916 – July 3, 2005) was an American politician from Wisconsin who served as a United States Senator and governor. A Democrat, he was the founder of Earth Day, which launched a new wave of environmental activism.

specific_points:3 evidence:2

no_non_con:2 provocative:1

no_toxic:3

Gosh do i get a prize . I really respect Jeffrey Simpson for his writing skills , his knowledge , his wit , and besides hes hot hot hot . Babe magnet . But there is one mistake . In your article . hire me as your fact checker . your article mentions moderate republicans like Gaylord Nelson . Well es wrong Mr. Simpson . Gaylord Anton Nelson ( June 4 , 1916 – July 3 , 2005 ) was an American politician from Wisconsin who served as a United States Senator and governor . A Democrat , he was the founder of Earth Day , which launched a new wave of environmental activism .

source1_14612526_11

The sham is the law. I agree with the free market producers, disagree with the need for a prescription. Regulate the same as alcohol which is sold only to adults. Simple. I also disagree on the prohibition of growing plants at home. There are sufficient laws to deal with people who steal electricity and turn homes into firetraps, no need to criminalize a substance. Legalize, regulate, tax. Same as alcohol. it's the only fair option.

specific_points:3 solution:1 evidence:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

The sham is the law . I agree with the free market producers , disagree with the need for a prescription . Regulate the same as alcohol which is sold only to adults . Simple . I also disagree on the prohibition of growing plants at home . There are sufficient laws to deal with people who steal electricity and turn homes into firetraps , no need to criminalize a substance . Legalize , regulate , tax . Same as alcohol . its the only fair option .

source1_14612526_104

As a cancer physician, Margaret is right on many accounts. The drug is probably being prescribed too liberally for patients who have no business being prescribed the medication (ie. back pain). In addition, there are other medications available which can achieve the same medical effects for which marijuana is prescribed. It doesn't mean that it can't or shouldn't be used (I have prescribed it and am comfortable doing so), but people shouldn't regard it as a miracle drug.

evidence:2 dialogue:1 specific_points:1 personal_story:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1 inflammatory:1 embarrassment:1

As a cancer physician , Margaret is right on many accounts . The drug is probably being prescribed too liberally for patients who have no business being prescribed the medication ( ie . back pain ) . In addition , there are other medications available which can achieve the same medical effects for which marijuana is prescribed . It doesnt mean that it cant or shouldnt be used ( I have prescribed it and am comfortable doing so ) , but people shouldnt regard it as a miracle drug .

source1_14612526_42

Last fall I was diagnosed with 4 prolapsed disks in my neck, and was in crippling pain. None of the prescribed medication helped me at all, only seemed to make me feel worse, physically and mentally. So I tried an alternative... taken internally, and used externally, my muscles relaxed, my mood lifted, and my body was able to heal slowly, without more pharmaceuticals or invasive surgery. The only side effect was a gentle euphoria.

evidence:3 specific_points:2 solution:1 personal_story:1

no_non_con:2 unsubstantial:1

no_toxic:3

Last fall I was diagnosed with 4 prolapsed disks in my neck , and was in crippling pain . None of the prescribed medication helped me at all , only seemed to make me feel worse , physically and mentally . So I tried an alternative ... taken internally , and used externally , my muscles relaxed , my mood lifted , and my body was able to heal slowly , without more pharmaceuticals or invasive surgery . The only side effect was a gentle euphoria .

source1_12468271_24

It's good to see the G&M corrected their mistake in the article on the issue of banked sick days for federal employees. I know their are other unionized groups in provincial and municipal agencies where the banking/payout regime exists. The writer is right in that on its own, this benefit does not make sense. What I'm wondering is where there is a move to take this away, will the unions respond with something like 'Look, in the 1987 contract negotiation, we agreed to that benefit in place of an additional 2% increase over the next 5 years of the contract. So either pay out the accrued sick days now or calculate the back pay on what that increase would have been.' I'm not saying this can't be overcome but it certainly could arise.

specific_points:3 solution:1 evidence:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

Its good to see the G & M corrected their mistake in the article on the issue of banked sick days for federal employees . I know their are other unionized groups in provincial and municipal agencies where the banking/payout regime exists . The writer is right in that on its own , this benefit does not make sense . What Im wondering is where there is a move to take this away , will the unions respond with something like Look , in the 1987 contract negotiation , we agreed to that benefit in place of an additional 2 % increase over the next 5 years of the contract . So either pay out the accrued sick days now or calculate the back pay on what that increase would have been . Im not saying this cant be overcome but it certainly could arise .

source1_12468271_117

I'm a fed public service employee and I welcome the changes. I don't need 6 months of banked leave (which I currently have) and I don't need 15 days of sick leave a year. While most public servants don't abuse the system (which is why there currently is a $5.2B liability), there are some and as someone who has to cover off for those people, please, bring on the amendments and I'll make it clear to my union that I support the changes. One error in the article, we don't get paid out for sick days upon retirement, we lose them, which is the way it should be. G&M needs to make a correction.

specific_points:3

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

Im a fed public service employee and I welcome the changes . I dont need 6 months of banked leave ( which I currently have ) and I dont need 15 days of sick leave a year . While most public servants dont abuse the system ( which is why there currently is a $ 5.2B liability ) , there are some and as someone who has to cover off for those people , please , bring on the amendments and Ill make it clear to my union that I support the changes . One error in the article , we dont get paid out for sick days upon retirement , we lose them , which is the way it should be . G & M needs to make a correction .

source1_32373808_41

I think Federal Reserve sees major problems on the horizon as per the article today in G&M. She has acknowledged that QE/zero interest rate/ use of HFTs to manipulate commodity pricing has failed. She is suggesting an 180 degree swing in policy is about to happen. And Kerry has just today, announced to the world that it is HFCs that are the real problem, 1000 times worse than CO2 and that the temperature rise will now be half of what we have been told as a result of getting rid of HFCs. There are a lot of men choosing to be stay at home moms... there are equally a large number of women who want the challenges of being in the workforce , as I see it. Quite a day.

specific_points:4 dialogue:2 evidence:2 solution:1 personal_story:1

no_non_con:5 sarcastic:1

no_toxic:3

I think Federal Reserve sees major problems on the horizon as per the article today in G & M . She has acknowledged that QE/zero interest rate/ use of HFTs to manipulate commodity pricing has failed . She is suggesting an 180 degree swing in policy is about to happen . And Kerry has just today , announced to the world that it is HFCs that are the real problem , 1000 times worse than CO2 and that the temperature rise will now be half of what we have been told as a result of getting rid of HFCs . There are a lot of men choosing to be stay at home moms ... there are equally a large number of women who want the challenges of being in the workforce , as I see it . Quite a day .

source1_32655412_116

Where were the editorials against redistrcitng, advocating for term limits and criticizing a primary system that is rigged and ended up producing such unpalatable candidates? It's the same system that says trade is 'free' with countries that have no labour, IP or environmental laws. The MSM is indicted more on what they don't report than on how, they report what they do.

specific_points:2 personal_story:1 dialogue:1 evidence:1

no_non_con:3 provocative:1

no_toxic:3

Where were the editorials against redistrcitng , advocating for term limits and criticizing a primary system that is rigged and ended up producing such unpalatable candidates ? Its the same system that says trade is free with countries that have no labour , IP or environmental laws . The MSM is indicted more on what they dont report than on how , they report what they do .

source1_27307063_8

Another simplistic analysis from a partisan con whose only looking to score political pointsHistory will prove who is right. You are caught by emotion and not reason here. Besides read what the French ambassador said - he's not even remotely upset but in fact praising Canada for our help. Which includes taking refugees btw since that helps France too.

dialogue:2 no_con:1 specific_points:1

no_non_con:2 provocative:1

no_toxic:3

Another simplistic analysis from a partisan con whose only looking to score political pointsHistory will prove who is right . You are caught by emotion and not reason here . Besides read what the French ambassador said - hes not even remotely upset but in fact praising Canada for our help . Which includes taking refugees btw since that helps France too .

source1_27307063_10

To keep on doing something that does not work is an even worse move.

specific_points:3 solution:2 evidence:1 dialogue:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

To keep on doing something that does not work is an even worse move .

source1_27307063_99

The token nature of the contribution to the air attack is the real issue in this debate. Canada is spending several hundred million dollars to keep 6 fighter bombers in the region that will make no difference to the outcome of the campaign. Optics are important but so is taking a part that will actually make a difference. The only means to defeat the threat is to create a credible force on the ground that can retake territory. That means training and equipping local forces az there is zero chance that any administration in Washington or any stripe is going to commit troops to another land war in the area. I am still hopeful that an internal struggle will cause it to collapse - the dupes in the front line will eventually get tired of seeing the leadership living well while they manifestly do not. One can't live on religious mania alone for any length of time.

evidence:3 solution:1 specific_points:1 personal_story:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

The token nature of the contribution to the air attack is the real issue in this debate . Canada is spending several hundred million dollars to keep 6 fighter bombers in the region that will make no difference to the outcome of the campaign . Optics are important but so is taking a part that will actually make a difference . The only means to defeat the threat is to create a credible force on the ground that can retake territory . That means training and equipping local forces az there is zero chance that any administration in Washington or any stripe is going to commit troops to another land war in the area . I am still hopeful that an internal struggle will cause it to collapse - the dupes in the front line will eventually get tired of seeing the leadership living well while they manifestly do not . One cant live on religious mania alone for any length of time .

source1_27307063_18

Canada is not withdrawing troops and is supportive with medical aid and training on the ground. So this is a hawkish puff piece or noise and attitude. Iraq, Afghanistan and Syrian bombings have only led to the loss of infrastructure and people's lives besides the 'enemy' and do very little other than blunting offensives. Canada has learned from this and needs to move on.

specific_points:3 evidence:2 solution:1

no_non_con:2 sarcastic:1 provocative:1

no_toxic:3

Canada is not withdrawing troops and is supportive with medical aid and training on the ground . So this is a hawkish puff piece or noise and attitude . Iraq , Afghanistan and Syrian bombings have only led to the loss of infrastructure and peoples lives besides the enemy and do very little other than blunting offensives . Canada has learned from this and needs to move on .

source2_27307063_159

We should make an agreement that all efforts will be made to wipe out ISIS but we should also pledge to end the decades old conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. This is where the seed of hatred was planted and grew to what it is today. The West must accept its share of the blame for todays events and show equal determination to act on both issues. It's time to say 'No' to Israel and make clear that its policies of the past decades have brought us to where we are today. Hamas found its following from the feeling of helplessness amongst Palestinians. ISIS has in many ways found a following amongst those who feel they have little future. Fight to the bitter end for 'Fairness & Freedom' but use an Equitable and Fair Hand. The same set of rules for everyone.

specific_points:3

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

We should make an agreement that all efforts will be made to wipe out ISIS but we should also pledge to end the decades old conflict between Israel and the Palestinians . This is where the seed of hatred was planted and grew to what it is today . The West must accept its share of the blame for todays events and show equal determination to act on both issues . Its time to say No to Israel and make clear that its policies of the past decades have brought us to where we are today . Hamas found its following from the feeling of helplessness amongst Palestinians . ISIS has in many ways found a following amongst those who feel they have little future . Fight to the bitter end for Fairness & Freedom but use an Equitable and Fair Hand . The same set of rules for everyone .

source1_31520824_113

The public focus on the smaller expenditures of ministers can be more readily explained by the fact that the public has a better idea of what a ride to the airport costs, but it has no idea about what it costs to build a road or a subway. The public has to trust that the ministers involved have made the right choices on the big ticket items. That trust is eroded when the ministers spend crazy amounts of money on the smaller items that the public can identify with.

specific_points:2 personal_story:1 dialogue:1 evidence:1

no_non_con:1 unsubstantial:1 provocative:1

no_toxic:3

The public focus on the smaller expenditures of ministers can be more readily explained by the fact that the public has a better idea of what a ride to the airport costs , but it has no idea about what it costs to build a road or a subway . The public has to trust that the ministers involved have made the right choices on the big ticket items . That trust is eroded when the ministers spend crazy amounts of money on the smaller items that the public can identify with .

source1_31520824_67

These people aren't 'grandees', but elected officials who claimed they were running for office for the betterment of all. Imagine helping someone in need out with 2,000 dollars, instead of strutting around in a Lexus.

specific_points:3 evidence:2

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

These people arent grandees , but elected officials who claimed they were running for office for the betterment of all . Imagine helping someone in need out with 2,000 dollars , instead of strutting around in a Lexus .

source1_31520824_147

The expense claims of politicians pale in comparison to the expense claims of business people, which are used to reduce the taxes paid by corporations. Politicians and business people should be forced to follow the expenditure limits of the civil service. That way we would all be on an equal footing.

specific_points:4 solution:3 dialogue:2 personal_story:1

no_non_con:5 sarcastic:1

no_toxic:3

The expense claims of politicians pale in comparison to the expense claims of business people , which are used to reduce the taxes paid by corporations . Politicians and business people should be forced to follow the expenditure limits of the civil service . That way we would all be on an equal footing .

source1_32604218_1

The G&M editorial board has forgotten the FBI thought they had all Clintons emails before this new batch showed up . The G&M editorial board has forgotten it was Clintons team who reviewed all the emails deleting many and forwarded only those they thought appropriate. The G&M editorial board assumes all the emails do not have classified info. The G&M editorial board has forgotten Ms. Clinton broke the law when she did not leave her correspondence with the National Archives. The G&M editorial board has forgotten the FBI had to piece together deleted emails on discarded servers. The G&M board has forgotten Bill met the AG on an Aircraft and therefore left any decision to prosecute up to the FBI Director. Therefore why does the G&M editorial board believe the FBI Director was wrong when a new batch of emails is revealed and must be reviewed when the FBI thought they had all the emails earlier.

specific_points:5 evidence:3 dialogue:2

no_non_con:5 provocative:1

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1

The G & M editorial board has forgotten the FBI thought they had all Clintons emails before this new batch showed up . The G & M editorial board has forgotten it was Clintons team who reviewed all the emails deleting many and forwarded only those they thought appropriate . The G & M editorial board assumes all the emails do not have classified info . The G & M editorial board has forgotten Ms. Clinton broke the law when she did not leave her correspondence with the National Archives . The G & M editorial board has forgotten the FBI had to piece together deleted emails on discarded servers . The G & M board has forgotten Bill met the AG on an Aircraft and therefore left any decision to prosecute up to the FBI Director . Therefore why does the G & M editorial board believe the FBI Director was wrong when a new batch of emails is revealed and must be reviewed when the FBI thought they had all the emails earlier .

source1_29037053_30

If Hillary is the nominee, she will have to seriously embrace a number of Sanders proposals and come off sounding real and genuine about it. She will the spirit and involvement of Sanders' supporters if she has a hope of winning. A fair number of Sanders' supporters are also looking at Trump and at this point it is a toss up for them. If she can persuade those voters she definitely win, the only obstacle to that is the visceral hatred of Hillary among right wing voters.

specific_points:2 dialogue:1 no_con:1 personal_story:1

no_non_con:1 unsubstantial:1 provocative:1

no_toxic:3

If Hillary is the nominee , she will have to seriously embrace a number of Sanders proposals and come off sounding real and genuine about it . She will the spirit and involvement of Sanders supporters if she has a hope of winning . A fair number of Sanders supporters are also looking at Trump and at this point it is a toss up for them . If she can persuade those voters she definitely win , the only obstacle to that is the visceral hatred of Hillary among right wing voters .

source1_28225596_53

It's worth noting that, although the Liberals did, in fact, recruit '… a next-generation, charismatic leader with excellent communications skills, a pleasing personality, and an army of social-media activists,' the leader himself took the novel approach of recruiting a large collection of new, highly qualified candidates. This is an approach that could work toward the benefit of all the parties and of the country. The last government was criticized for its cohort of 'trained seals' who, when they did anything at all, acted like attack dogs. The attack dog style seems to have survived the election although the trainers have left the building. Recruiting candidates who are experienced, well-educated, thinking people could raise the level of political discourse and lead to a general improvement in the quality of government.

specific_points:2 solution:1 dialogue:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:2 personal_attack:1

Its worth noting that , although the Liberals did , in fact , recruit … a next-generation , charismatic leader with excellent communications skills , a pleasing personality , and an army of social-media activists , the leader himself took the novel approach of recruiting a large collection of new , highly qualified candidates . This is an approach that could work toward the benefit of all the parties and of the country . The last government was criticized for its cohort of trained seals who , when they did anything at all , acted like attack dogs . The attack dog style seems to have survived the election although the trainers have left the building . Recruiting candidates who are experienced , well-educated , thinking people could raise the level of political discourse and lead to a general improvement in the quality of government .

source1_16350272_34

This is Canada. Not everyone practices the same religion, but most people know that Women are a vital part of our society and day to day lives. I'm not too religious so to hear that a Canadian Institution of any sort is trying to promote someone's religion over gender equality is disgusting! People can practice, change their religious beliefs whenever they want. A woman who is born a woman can't change who she is. That should not mean they are suddenly inferior to everyone else. This is not the 1700's and not the Mid East. We are proud Canadians, all of us, women included. I believe people of all religious beliefs add value to our society and economy, but the line must be drawn on some issues, this is one of them.

specific_points:4 solution:1

no_non_con:4

no_toxic:3

This is Canada . Not everyone practices the same religion , but most people know that Women are a vital part of our society and day to day lives . Im not too religious so to hear that a Canadian Institution of any sort is trying to promote someones religion over gender equality is disgusting ! People can practice , change their religious beliefs whenever they want . A woman who is born a woman cant change who she is . That should not mean they are suddenly inferior to everyone else . This is not the 1700s and not the Mid East . We are proud Canadians , all of us , women included . I believe people of all religious beliefs add value to our society and economy , but the line must be drawn on some issues , this is one of them .

source2_29405071_25

Readers and columnists should resist the temptation to wear their grief for Rob Ford on their sleeves. The man was well treated by the press during his terms as councilor and mayor. He received all the respect he deserved when he was alive, and his funeral is being well attended; there is no necessity for guilt.

specific_points:2 dialogue:1 evidence:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

Readers and columnists should resist the temptation to wear their grief for Rob Ford on their sleeves . The man was well treated by the press during his terms as councilor and mayor . He received all the respect he deserved when he was alive , and his funeral is being well attended ; there is no necessity for guilt .

source1_25141317_3

I sure hope not because the country was very successful when it was run by Liberals and now it seems to be going downhill fast. But the biggest thing is the polarization of politics. That has got to stop. A country needs to make compromises. It is a reflection of our neighbours to the south and it is bad.

evidence:3 solution:2 specific_points:1 dialogue:1

no_non_con:3

no_toxic:3

I sure hope not because the country was very successful when it was run by Liberals and now it seems to be going downhill fast . But the biggest thing is the polarization of politics . That has got to stop . A country needs to make compromises . It is a reflection of our neighbours to the south and it is bad .

source1_25141317_140

Jean Chretien was the beginning of the Liberal Party being socially conservative. He helped establish the Charter, but he fought medical marijuana all the way up to the Supreme Court. While he did establish the MMAR, he and Paul Martin put in place a regime which didn't really work and which left many patients going to the black market for medicine. They didn't support research into delivery systems other than smoking. They kept vaporizers illegal. Pretty much right wing stuff.

specific_points:3 solution:1 dialogue:1

no_non_con:2 provocative:1

no_toxic:3

Jean Chretien was the beginning of the Liberal Party being socially conservative . He helped establish the Charter , but he fought medical marijuana all the way up to the Supreme Court . While he did establish the MMAR , he and Paul Martin put in place a regime which didnt really work and which left many patients going to the black market for medicine . They didnt support research into delivery systems other than smoking . They kept vaporizers illegal . Pretty much right wing stuff .