Datasets:

SINAI

/

MCE-Corpus

like 0

Follow

Grupo de investigación en Sistemas Inteligentes de Acceso a la Información (SINAI) de la Universidad de Jaén 13

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/651

Plissken

Alatriste

muchocine

I hope that they conform with the box office success, because at the cinematographic level, the most awaited Spanish production of the year has been in a kind of trailer for two hours and a half.

There are things that can not be, as much as one try. Not to cover a trunk of Redwood with arms. Not to drink more beer than fits in the own stomach at a stroke. Five books in one movie can not be adapted. That is the lesson that should be drawn Agustín Díaz Yanes and his team of the final outcome of 'Alatriste'.I hope that they conform with the success at the box office, because to cinematographic level, the most anticipated of the year Spanish production has become a kind of trailer for two hours and a half, in which concepts as basic as the narrative pace, character development, or searching for the action/reaction is obviate almost altogether, grew the faithful followers of the literary with battering of the type "ten years later" and confusing to the ignorant of the Pérez-Reverte saga (myself, for example), to be assumed that "this the public already knows". This negative impression is accentuated because the director is halfway between the over-production of adventures and palatial intrigue of unspectacular appearance, with the film irritating to all sorts of audiences alike.On the positive side of the balance, emphasizes the powerful atmosphere (especially costumes) and care photo treatment of Paco Femenia, as well as the presence of Viggo Mortensen, despite the handicap of his accent than I cloudy, defends his character with great dignity; and unlike Sergio Peris-Mencheta in 'Los Borgia', you can with the weight of the film (or the trailer, at least). Enrico Lo Verso, Juan Echanove, Ariadna Gil, Francesc Garrido, Javier Cámara, and above all, Eduard Fernández, also take their roles in solvency. And some isolated chapter (the site of Flanders, personally is the part that I liked) serves as the point of what this film could have been, in other hands.Because on the negative side, apart from some bump in the casting errors (why Unax Ugalde can't put another face, still ahead of Elena Anaya or the French Cavalry? to what das Pilar López de Ayala, Pilar Bardem, Cristina Marcos or Paco Tous as insignificant roles? why Blanca Portillo doing of Inquisitor? why, just why?)(Do, Eduardo Noriega?), la palma is the absence of narrative that makes what you do not know if you attend a chronicle of the twilight of the Spanish Empire, a follow-up of the main character, a choral drama or a collection of highlights of the whiskered protagonist. He spoke of 'Los Borgia' throwing in face the precipitation in solving history. But this is worse, this is not what count.And the worst, knowing not how to tell it, because Díaz Yanes is limited to put us in a situation with a "Madrid, ten years later," and enter any of the "occurred" shows with greater or lesser success, without giving the opportunity to hear why everyone wants him to betray turn to profane in the universe of Alatristefor example, or why Íñigo Balboa is hired one day murderer and prisoner of galleys the other, or how Alatriste manages to convince the selfsame Conde Duque de Olivares that makes it a personal favor. Díaz Yanes suppressing the very necessary scenes of transition to readjust to the spectators, and achieved what the flojita 'Los Borgia' could not: get me. A 3, by the work of some actors and the setting.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3194

Iñaki Bilbao

Un funeral de muerte

muchocine

Nice British comedy with genuine English taste. Sparkling dialogues, endearing characters and crazy situations arising for the sake of a hallucinogenic substance intake.

Nice comedy with the pleasant aroma of the genuine English film which virtually disappeared with the former and missed Ealing Studio. Here, given the times, humour it contains abundant concomitancias more, as well as a couple of eschatological scenes which, frankly, are the best of the film. A film that, in what in my regard, takes a while to enter in the field, being a poquillo sosa at first. They are the scenes in which we discover the various characters, very necessary for understanding and delectation of what will happen next.And it is that, as they pass the minutes, it becomes more and more fun, with moments descacharrarrantes, reaching an end simply descojonante. This is due to a right direction of the American Frank Oz, who already had experience in narrating the vicissitudes of unconventional people, and a group of British performers, as well as the nature of New Jersery Peter Dinklage, comprising his roles with simple mastery. Since people here and now quite unknown to distinguished veterans as Peter Vaughan as the ineffable Uncle prevented in a wheelchair.A movie with sparkling dialogues, endearing characters and crazy situations arising for the sake of a hallucinogenic substance intake. It is less more and leaving the viewer has a smile from ear to ear. Totally recommended.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/670

Rafa Ferrer

Corrupción en Miami

muchocine

Film action, well planned and well shot although it is intended to accompany a, already cult series for those who we rondamos the thirty, little, not to say nothing, has to do with the original.

Adaptation to the big screen in the series "Miami Vice", where the only link between this and the film that runs one of the producers of the same, Michael Mann, lies only in the title and in the name of the protagonists (Colin Farrell and Jamie Foxx in its fair measure), the tape is lost between a quite normal argumenta setting which reminds "Collateral" and "Heat", and a photo and a luminosity opaque and quite dark.Michael Mann, has been able to accompany the Ribbon, a noisy soundtrack, by what this current cinema mania? where only musical references to that style 1980s MTV, is a home of the main theme (chords only), and the theme of Phill Collins that closes it.On the other hand, descataría to side 2 of luxury of the film, on the one hand, Luis Tosar, as the bad guy movie (it Mania has given Hollywood to us as the bad), and on the other side to Gong Li, which we enjoy in "Memoirs of a Geisha", as the vase woman that accompanies the protagonists.Film action, well planned and well shot although it is intended to accompany a, already cult series for those who we rondamos the thirty, little, not to say nothing, has to do with the original.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1049

Ramón Balcells

La sombra de la sospecha

muchocine

A topical bad film, however, fulfilling its mission: entertain.

Summer movies tend to be, as you can see, palomiteros blockbusters, tapes of intrigue and action, sequels, more sequels and remakes. Of course, us we can always find a few exceptions, a film not necessarily commercial, rather independent, with a good and orignal script (such as the not yet released the girl of water). Since recently, with the intention to only entertain me and not worry large scripts or addresses impeccable, I went to see, I guess that by the attractive cast and the nothing orignal, but repeatedly entertained, argument (the attempted assassination of a President). It is of (do not think that her you already seen by the title, which must be the simplest and little original this year) the shadow of suspicion. Is starring an aged Michael Douglas (who bears a resemblance more than reasonable to Matías Prats, but without the segurata sunglasses), Kiefer Sutherland (which makes the same role as in the extraordinary television series 24), Eva Longoria (do not know how can have entered such production coming from the also excellent series desperate housewives) and Kim Basinger (that only who know say "going to kill")("Care, a weapon!" or similar crap). As you can see, the cast is nothing out of this world, but is quite right and above all, appealing to the public.The shadow of suspicion (The Sentinel is the original title, also is simple, but passable) tries to create a television environment (a chapter of the aforementioned series 24) in a film. The attempt, in my opinion, has not served to nothing, or rather, is much more less than the series of Jack Bauer. The film only would be it missing to transucurriera in real time so that he could call 24, the film. Ultimately, that is not orignal, but entertaining (which is what I was).The argument I can only say little, that little thing. I believe that with the phrase "the attempted assassination of the President impeded by a few federal agents and a conspiracy in the White House" can be summarized the shadow of suspicion. Ah!, and if you do not guess who is the traitor in the half hour of the film is that you have no experience (just kidding). I just want to say that it looks a lot.A topical bad film, however, fulfilling its mission: entertain (but not as much as 24, which a day longer I speak more carefully).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2404

Oscar Cantero

Quédate a mi lado

muchocine

A drama in every rule, that magnificent interpretation and the popularity of its protagonist terceto, save to a movie and make it a good movie.

I've always thought that for dramas, real life is, unfortunately, an inexhaustible source. In addition, I think the film as a way of escape the routine of everyday life and problems, and perhaps why science fiction is one of my favorite genres and the drama the less appreciated.Stay by my side is a drama in every rule, that talent and the popularity of its two main female protagonists, Susan Sarandon and Julia Roberts, saved from being a TV movie.The terrible story that recounts is a separate mother is diagnosed with cancer and dedicated his last months to prepare their children to live with their farcical and his new wife, which until then had not had good relationship, but which will entrust the care of its offshoots.The interrelations between the characters, the gradual acceptance among some and others and the approach of the two women formerly faced, constitute the linchpin of this film that stretches for two hours.Being an issue so thorny and delicate, which must pass many people, the least you can ask it is concerned with the lower possible ruggedness, what we need to recognize that it has tried to do successfully.Obviously in a production of this kind, the technical aspects are, to put it somehow secondary. The soundtrack is perfectly seated to the tempo of the film, helping to intensify the perceptions of the viewer at any given time.Little more I can say about this film, except that I have been forced to see her by the stubbornness of my sister, who enjoys with the dramones as a small child in a swimming pool. It is the responsibility that I has been so bad taste by the sadness caused by contemplating a tragedy that can happen to anyone. In any case, acceptable as a film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1306

Kiko de España

Apocalypto

muchocine

Apocalypto is an action-adventure movie that turns to topics that seemed forgotten.

Says George Lucas in connection with the Supercine of time roll Cecil B. De Mille in the documentary of fashion blogs, A Personal Journey with Martin Scorsese Through American Movies than anyone currently do a sequence with two thousand extras taking technological advances that has American cinema.And I say: let us hope a couple of movies more than Mel.Apocalypto is an action film. As cornered, like predator or as a lethal weapon. It is very well shot, it of course (it was already for my higher the passion of the Christ) and has moments of wonderful stealth film.But is a movie action-adventure that turns to topics that seemed forgotten (the waterfall of the fugitive.) and modern theatrics of the type "time announcement of Pirelli" (Ronaldinho with jaguar behind.) the sea of entertaining.And it is a movie of author. I does not attract more than Marie Antoinette but if rather than flags of our fathers.PS: It may he suffer the syndrome of "all have already seen and say that it is fucking great" or that note interfere with the Lord that snoring lying!!!! in three seats with his wife (I got up, started them to stock and they largaron at the height of the attack of the village) or the MOM Disney who exclaimed Oooohhhh! every time that a child appeared on the screen. I exclaimed it everytime someone was destripado. And there are not so many. There is more blood in the back of James Caviezel as in the village of Jaguar Paw.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3347

Ana Belén Pacheco

Zombies party

muchocine

Shaun of The Dead should be declared a cult Film for posterity. A slogan can be defined: making fun of everything and everyone: of the clichés of the clichés of the slow, serious movies zombies. Maquiavélicamente perfect.

I will not go to try to explain that combination of alcohol and psychotropic substances translators decided to put the incredible title of Zombies Party to Shaun of the Dead, once discarded to make the title more "Castilian" prefer to simply fantasize about crazy bet carried out to try to boycott one of the best comedies in contemporary of our time in a terrible way.This perlite will have gone unnoticed for the majority of mortals because it is English, had little or no promotion and its main strengths are that the director and actors had collaborated successfully in the series Spaced issued in Great Britain where it has many acolytes (all of them recruited to make zombies at the end of the tape of voluntarily and the symbolic 1 pound amount) but that Spain nobody knows."Shaun is an English medium: lives in a House shared in the London neighborhood of Crouch End, has a mediocre job and his main hobby is to go to your favorite Pub the"Winchester"to paint". Obviously his girlfriend is fed up with him and responsible teammate does not support his family has more and minuses that his stepfather is not exactly charming. The problem is that one tomorrow Shaun rises and its around start to happen strange things. At the beginning doesn't notice, course, the English are rare people and drunks from two in the afternoon, I also percataría me of the unusual fact that have become Zombies who want to eat it.There are several things that I love in this film. One of them is that after seeing her in 2004 the fate did to work right next to where his characters lived so I can boast of having bought milk many times in the shop that Shaun came and where he began to see their monstrous friends. This anecdote only thing that makes is feel even more sympathy for this tape forced vision to any lover of good cinema. Half of my acquaintances have been threatened with death so they see and given that 95% are agree with me that almost suffered an embolism for the attacks of laughter I think that Shaun of The Dead should be declared a cult Film for posterity.The brilliance of the script is owe to Edgar Wright and Simon Pegg (the first director of the creature and the second its protagonist). A real fan of the genre films beyond the basic jokes recocerá iconography series say mentioning: George a. Romero, Peter Jackson, Robert Rodriguez, Tarantino, phrases of the own Spaced and so long that it would be impossible to concretize list. If you are not a supporter of this type of film you can enjoy much discovering great truths of humanity to escape a zombie that is very slow pointless or any bad disc can be a good weapon if necessary.A slogan can be defined: making fun of everything and everyone: of the clichés of the clichés of the slow, serious movies zombies Maquiavélicamente perfect.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/448

Jeremy Fox

Alatriste

muchocine

Spanish cinema has lost an historic opportunity to create a jewel easily exportable to much of the planet. Had material to do so and we have failed. Again will be.

Big advertised as the most expensive film in the history of the Spanish cinema (cost 24 million euros), came to the end to our screens "Alatriste" of Agustín Díaz Yanes.Como everybody knows, is the adaptation of the five novels by Arturo Pérez-Reverte on the adventures of Captain Alatriste (Viggo Mortensen) and his friends in which the battles they in Flanders and palatial intrigue of the count-Duke of Olivares (Javier Cámara)Fray Emilio Bocanegra (Blanca Portillo) or King Philip IV are dotted with references to Velazquez or Quevedo (Juan Echanove) forming the whole a good portrait of the Spain of the 17TH century.This historical fresco is one of the strengths of the film Diaz Yanes, due among other factors to their beautiful soundtrack of Roque Baños and its wonderful art direction (Benjamín Fernández) and costumes (Francesca Sartori). Because if something get the film is moving to Madrid from the 17TH century with great effectiveness, dirty and dark streets, their social differences, their morality? The option of realism is evident in scenes of battles in which Díaz Yanes decides to renounce the showmanship and great typical mass movements of the blockbusters and offer us General plans in which we can clearly see that the soldiers in contention are a few tens.Photography (Paco Femenia) is also an authentic delicacy, imitating the style of some paintings of that time and helping to create that pessimistic atmosphere that envelops the entire film. Fully justified being, pessimism in a way, of the portrait of a society and an empire began to crumble.With regard to the actors I can not complain me because they are all fine. To those already mentioned, it should be added to Elena Anaya, Antonio Dechent, Eduard Fernández, Ariadna Gil, Pilar López de Ayala, Eduardo Noriega and Unax Ugalde. For me all are equal but that aspen me if I know why Fray Emilio Bocanegra is portrayed by a woman (the great Blanca Portillo).But, above all, the soul of the film is Viggo Mortensen, who composed a perfect, fatalistic, Alatriste disenchanted, ruthless with enemies but loyal with friends. An actor with a magnificent presence which, although it is true that has a strange accent is so stuck in the paper that there comes a time in which convinces me that no one else could have been Alatrsite and that rare voice is the perfect for the character.So far it seems that everything works in the movie, right? Well not. Everything actually works in the film, except for the film. I do not know if it is a failure of script because of wanting to do too much (remember that he fits five different novels about the character) or Assembly by having excessively cut footage to give a more commercial period. What is clear is that the rhythm is never right, to the point of becoming imperdonablemente boring in some passages. Also lacks strength and narrative pulse that does not help to make attractive the least boring moments.The sensation is in the Viewer is watching a lavish television series which you have cut half of the scenes for its passage by the cinemas. So we skip a few scenes to others without solution of continuity, without giving time to create the right atmosphere and with ellipsis that they cry out to heaven. A trailer for two hours and a half which could have been a great movie for four or five hours.Final "Alatriste" demonstrates, once more, a blockbuster that nothing we can do with money on the table have envy to the Americans in the final product. The trouble is that we have failed to know better than they do them and one is left with the impression that Spanish cinema has lost an historic opportunity to create a jewel easily exportable to much of the planet. Had material to do so and we have failed. Again will be.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4294

Daniel Galindo

Hacia rutas salvajes

muchocine

Confirmed as accurate director, with their own style to tell things, Sean Penn proposed a story simple although of epic proportions, more so it has that false claims of greatness.

They say that to delve into the big issues facing human beings only we must look within oneself. The search for the truth and one's identity is already almost a genre in every rule in the literature, in the film now this title combines both formats - could include here the musical, thanks to the superb soundtrack-, although the best-selling book becomes a semi-autor film.The actor got to filmmaker leaves the urban drama to which we had become accustomed and opts for a story calling beautiful panoramic, risky levels and shots in which time seems to stop. Too idyllic to the story so hard that presents us with? It may be, now well, it doesn't matter that a such raw story, the way of overcoming that undertakes a lost young man, has a suggestive wrapper, the problem is that sometimes you forget the tragedy suffered by the character with the inclusion of Visual effects such as the writing on the screen. One of the bets of this production was the young actor Emile Hirsch, tanning in TV series and short appearances on the big screen. Get impregnated really a character that could have been lost between so much literary ínfula that can Sin a soliloquy, but Penn resolves the ballot with a montage which are not at all agile, relieves at times - while this story requests shouts two hours of our time, at least 120 minutes of concentration and avoidance of reality.Speaking of footage, the film only has a few drawbacks: extend in certain stages of the voyage; the protagonist Leonardo DiCaprio - this remember not to blame the poor-; the action is descompense because the visual is imposed on narrative; and that, in general terms, the tape see diminished its qualities for a lot of critics to denote it as a committed, philosophical or initiatory work none of that! Towards wild routes is not more than a choice of life, a lesson in cinema.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/917

Oscar Cantero

The holiday

muchocine

With a simple plot, a development slow and absurd bored to the painted and a good dose of frivolity in the treatment of the things, The Holiday is a production that appears to have been made by copying and pasting scenes and dialogues of other films.

In case the Christmas is not a time steeped in traditions of all kinds, many years ago that the American film industry brings a bit dedicated to bombard us with romantic comedies that premiere during these dates. They tend to be films of simple script, predictable and saturated with sparsely witty jokes, end in which the lives of the protagonists, almost always embodied by familiar faces, radically changes in record time. Nancy Myers has already demonstrated that dominated the genre with titles such as when least you expect them or what women think, and The Holiday aims to follow in the footsteps of success and social acceptance which accounted for his previous works. But let us not deceive ourselves; We are faced with a film in which resorts to all existing topics, to the most extreme sentimentality and which even the most decent interpretation of Cameron Diaz, Kate Winslet and Jude Law is capable of giving the slightest viso of credibility and quality. With a simple plot, a slow and absurd development bored to the painted and a good dose of frivolity in the treatment of the things, The Holiday is a production that appears to have been made by copying and pasting scenes and dialogues of other films, and far from being emotional, can cause the hilarity of the spectator in the supposedly tender scenesWhile the comic fail to boot or more minimum atisbo smile. To make matters worse evils, the presence of the abject and always grotesque Jack Black, contributes to making more unpleasant viewing of this millionaire nonsense. To forget.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/37

Tito Chinchan

Camaron

muchocine

I gave very good roll

The film is about the life of Jose Monge, better known as Camarón de la Isla. Tells us, with the help of his music, his life from childhood until his death. Born in a neighborhood of Cádiz, he failed as a bullfighter, which made him flush with flamenco. Friend of Paco de Lucía, quickly shows its worth becoming a myth, even a Messiah. The bad of his life, were their continuous tonteos with cocaine and heroin, which accelerated his early death.Not be why was, but the film gave me a good vibe. And it is not it is especially happy, but music of shrimp and the good Flemish guitarreos give a festive air which is fine. The actor main does Camaron, has deservedly won the Goya, given that does a role very, very good. Not be as it would be shrimp, but this kid plays a very realistic and very suffered. I'll take a phrase from the movie: "that has clavao the DART" representing perfectly the face of estreñido of the above. In bad, Verónica Sánchez, who has become the substitute of Lina Morgan as eternal schoolgirl. Not intended it to us we create is a 15 year old girl? Come on man, by God, if instead of the test of the handkerchief he was made of the sheet (little santa). If I am not saying this I bust and filled it all of viscera.In short, deserves much see the movie. As an anecdote, the protagonist is the same "November", which gives him very good references.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1929

Francisco Bellón

Dame 10 razones

muchocine

Give me 10 reasons is a fun, interesting and intelligent comedy that pretending to be a very entertaining while the Viewer, that you not offended or takes it for fool.

American independent cinema is experiencing in recent years a second golden age after several years of almost absolute mediocrity. In fact, with a few Honorable exceptions of Hollywood, most of the best American films of recent times are independent. There are some genres that is most noticeable this trend, especially in the comedy, given the shameful examples of major American studios.Give me 10 reasons is the story of a famous actor in low hours (Morgan Freeman), who visits a supermarket in a suburb of Los Angeles to investigate a charge character. There he meets Scarlet (Paz Vega), a vigorous cashier. Both engage in a peculiar and special relationship that will learn from each other. After his early work in Hollywood, Brad Silberling writes and directs this fun and interesting human comedy, never trying to be pretentious or moralizing. The script is agile and resourceful, with some especially acidic moments in what refers to the life of a big star of the interpretation. The tape has several virtues that deserve to be featured, as the sense of veracity that transmits like the pace that prints Silberling, suitable for a comedy of these features. There will be who critique its duration, but is another virtue that adding scenes for the sole purpose of extending the film is somewhat absurd, and in most cases end up harming. Another great virtue is the end, that we did not desvelaremos here, anyone who wants to discover what you need to come to the nearest cinema. The two protagonists are some very fresh and natural, performances with Morgan Freeman playing and laughing at himself, and a Paz Vega ever more based on American lands through papers such as this.Give me 10 reasons is a fun, interesting and intelligent comedy that pretending to be a very entertaining while the Viewer, that you not offended or takes it for fool. Let us hope that Brad Silberling will continue in this line and abandon the line of work as A series of catastrophic misfortunes of Lemony Snicket.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1436

F. José Lorite

La Novia Cadaver

muchocine

Life and death are never so particularly represented as to when this Tim Burton, giving a ludicrous treatment, thus criticizing the current society.

Return to a world apart, the world of Tim Burton where he directs with Mike Johnson the new installment of this own universe, where the dead are not both and the living do not appear to be so.Tim Burton continued with its aforementioned own universe, in the line of nightmare before Christmas, now recreating an old Russian legend, that fits perfectly in that style obsessive seeking refined forms and impossible within the characteristic atmosphere of grim and ghostly, we already showed in works such as Bitelchus or Eduardo hands scissors, but away from the colorism of some of his latest works such as Big Fish and Charlie and the factory of Chocolate.Para recreation of this Russian legend Burton uses a technique as previously used as stop-motion, for the creation of the characters and the story has served a great team of animators include two Catalan brothers, the brothers Grangel which have achieved that his creations seem significantly to its dubbers, include Johnny Deep voice that puts Victor Van DortHelena Bonham Carter, which gives voice to the bride corpse, and Emily Watson to Victoria Everglot, giving life to their respective characters.In this legend, Victor Van Dort, rich family but without cache and Victoria Everglot aristocrats ruined family, two young men belonging to the Victorian era are going to marry without being known before, is a marriage for convenience although quickly emerged the spark between the two, in the trial of the wedding Victor is not able to pronounce their votes so dead of fear runs and practicing for a scary forest fits the ring in an old branch turns out to be the finger of a defunct, dead on the day of her wedding, dragged as well to the world of the dead, making his fiancée wait desolate in the world of the living.Life and death are never so particularly represented as to when this Tim Burton, giving a ludicrous treatment, thus criticizing the current society. In this new film proposed us two worlds, the world of the living and the world of the dead. The world of the living distilled hypocrisy, conventions and interests which causes a sad society off and without any color, while the world of the dead is more simple, giving importance to the feelings of its inhabitants looking for his happiness, causing a world of colorful, fun spontaneous and sincere, proof of this is the warmth with which receive new guests. Intelligent use of the music and the songs included in the film, having the exact time and without getting tired, are into perspective.Splendid film that you catch with all its tenderness and spontaneity, making you feel participate the travel of its protagonists towards his love, providing exquisite touches of love and nostalgia that hechizan in his fabulous staging.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3724

Rafa Ferrer

Soy leyenda

muchocine

A tape that will crush lockers, but that will no longer cold to the fans of the novel in which it is based, including myself, and I know that it is easy to leave the film saying the ubiquitous "I liked more the book..."

Is already here Will Smith to disrupt the Christmas box office, taking advantage of the pull of the novel of Richard Matherson, highly recommended to the tape, we have Mr. Smith on his umpteenth tape where exercises of Saviour of the world, although this time, it is slightly different from everything what has been done to us for a time this part, althoughafter previous as "Independence Day" "MIB" and similar one expected much more of Will (even that his voice is always, something that it has not happened here).We find ourselves before, as I have already said umpteenth grossing bomb, but seeking equal treatment both habitual consumer of action cinema popcorn maker, with the cult of reader of novels, out of the film I found the position to listen to the 2 sides (whom they had loved, that they had not read the novel) and those who were horrified by the little affection that Matherson lyrics had moved to the screen.It is also true that, in this case, in the trailers already showed us perfectly what they would teach on screen, and is, as says my best friend Isa, today, these "mini - I" movies, show more than what would be interested to see or hear the same (thanks to along with the screening have put us excellent trailers of "Crimes of Oxford" and "The Dark Knight"); Should begin to boycott the producers of Trailers?The cast is short, aside from Will, we find Alice Braga, niece of the famous Brazilian actress Sonia Braga, with which it shares artistic surname, and Charlie Tahan small and Willow Smith, think Will is getting little by little to their children the bug for the performance, the first being his son in "In search of happiness" and now his daughter, that, that, sweeping to House.Is true that the tape is full of Visual effects, given that the risk of New York deserted, as "The dark seekers" require such effects, and manage to impress (and scare, equal parts) to the audience, but if we only manage to save a film by "a few things" bad will. Ah! I can not forget me "Last man alive", which was the first adaptation of the novel that now brings us, and where a great Charlton Heston to honors killing vampires (which even gave more bad feeling that these).Finally, a tape that will crush lockers, but that will no longer cold to the fans of the novel in which it is based, including myself, and know that it is easy to leave the film saying the ubiquitous "I liked more the book."

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2515

Bloody Will

Next

muchocine

It is consumed as fast as the medium popcorn cardboard. Even in a cinema session of Terrace, with prices in half and the possibility of seeing two followed, this film is perfect.

Who said that this summer was no mutants?. Do after enjoying / punish with?Spider-Man 3 ′, and waiting for two weeks to come here?The 4 fantastic? with its sequel, the surprise of halftime occurs: Nicolas Cage, the visionary alias. He has caught the taste to this powers? and now step to the side of bland in their roles. ?Next? It is not a film: is a short story with just duration, and actors that do what they can to ensure that it does not become the most crappy 2007. The thing did not give more than the 88 minutes that lasts the tape.Does lee Tamahori has already forgotten the aesthetics of film printed to his best work?Do Mullholland Falls?, to focus on the worst of their ways, repeated like hotcakes in?It die another day? or?XxX 2 ′. With a solid as a short story by Philip k. Dick (?) 1954(The_Golden_Man?), and whose work as prolific has given wonders as?Blade Runner? or the semi-decente?Does Minority Report?, the director has due meets this time with the worst of his enemies, the typical writer of Hollywood that adapts and destroys one idea that seemed fairly consistent with a hobby that is becoming a classic of our times: make up for failures of script with a succession of scenes of action dressed with the latest in digital effects. Voila, we already have the film for release.The main premise is what would you do if you knew what is going to happen in the next two minutes?. To me I would not be much, but Chris Johnson (Cage), a magician from Las Vegas, given to be all one piece hunting desired by a get smart national security (Moore), and somewhat disorganized terrorists. After one sequence more than stupid that presents us with the powers of the subject in question and causes the warning illogical federal, the following is the race against time to stop a group of villains who, after stealing a nuclear bomb, intended to destroy everything, and who incidentally also want to apprehend the protagonist I don't know very well why. Between all, Johnson began one relationship rather than unnecessary con una chica, Liz (Jessica Biel), who will be trapped in the heart and will serve as insulting piece of exchangeable meat.(Only) to highlight all the scenes where Cage Dodge bullets, da esquinazo agents that lurk, or causes real avalanches where zafa controlled way by mm and that serve to hinder the rest of their persecutors. Did the powers of prediction that initially shows Johnson give to much and that? vision of the future? that only covers two minutes is a better gift than flying, be invulnerable or some good x-rays that pass through the clothes of Biel. Do as a good Bond, Cage ends by guide towards the Elimination of terrorists in a tour of a few stores that are more entertaining in the film good? and here is over all positive, the rest is to forget.If you ask an explanation about the powers of the protagonist, ye shall not have her. If you want an explanation of the obsession with national security by Johnson, you will not have her. If you want an explanation of the suitability of starting an affair when you are in search and capture, you will not have her. Even if you want an explanation of why Liz alert Johnson of the intentions of the Feds when they have told him that he is a criminal and knows it one day, not her you are going to find. And if you want an explanation for one of the endings more firecrackers this year, I have not. And what about Nicolas Cage. Do do this man begins to be a classic in our list of? the worst of the worst?. His choice of work in recent years is unfortunate or the less than deserved rebuke, because I say I do to read the scripts before you sign?. Again the face of cardboard in the situations of action, again the same ways and again his face of lap dog in the scenes with girl sharing level. I already begin to tremble each time that presents a film with Cage as the protagonist, and is not anything good. Julianne Moore is not to sign their best work, but to do so regularly exceeds vengeance to Cage in the scenes that share. Biel is a mere pretty face ever, and as they had to include scenes with a girl good looking, what better than she.If there is no further remedy and you are not equipped to take two hours in the cinema?Next? It is consumed as fast as the medium popcorn cardboard. Even in a cinema session of Terrace, with prices in half and the possibility of seeing two followed, this film is perfect. If not, refrain from such loss of an hour and a half little of his life and they expect that in three months it will be on DVD.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3417

Iñaki Bilbao

La Torre de Suso

muchocine

Hilarious comedy with a fund that could not be more dramatic.

Hilarious comedy with a fund that could not be more dramatic. But Tom Fernandez, thanks to a few interpreters in State of grace, get that the Viewer is laugh it at all times to account of the vicissitudes of a few quite streams characters, with more flaws in his life than a shotgun in fair, but also with overflowing vitality and sympathy.This is achieved with a lot of script, which does not lose face at any time to the various dramas that compose the human mosaic swarming by the tape, but get us'm with them, and at the end they love.Moments of great tenderness, where friendship is the current currency, even if it must pass various tests throughout the footage.No, it is not that the argument is credible, it is rather plausible, although there is no who creates various events, for example the change that gives one of the friends, the "first officer". But Tom Fernandez makes to us what we traguemos with potatoes given its positivity and sympathy.The truth is that you spend very well and leaves a superb taste, inter alia due to excellent performances and a script with great humanity and a beautiful music.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2561

Caty

El Experimento

muchocine

It is the type of movies returning to those films of suspense that made you will not move the legs in the projection or not the hands of the arms of the Chair or armchair, soltaras full to nervousness and impatience.

"Seeking volunteers for a social experiment for a period of 2 weeks, high remuneration;" refrain go those which can withstand extreme situations "with this disturbing announcement begins"Das Experiment"(the experiment), a sultry thriller inspired by real events (the experiment of the prison of Stanford in 1971, remembered as an aberration and a few events that ended in tragedy), directed by Oliver Hirschbiegel, debutant in the film but with great experience on German television and that"removing some defects, typical in the operas premiums of many directors, resolves a film where his Totem is the story tells us quite well. All items (music, sets, costumes, actors), dance around the chilling plot. Das Experiment won all possible awards in his country, Germany, and caused a sensation beyond where it happened.Tarek Fahd is a taxi driver, former reporter, while it ojea newspaper with apathy, found of face to face with the announcement of yore. With the idea of infiltrate, he attends the newspaper in which he worked and proposes to make a story with hidden camera everything living in that period of time. Enroll in the experiment, in which 20 men are divided into two groups, prisoners (12) and watchmen (8) an experiment where they have to live 2 weeks in a simulated prison, taking the roles that are assigned by lot, either prisoner or guard. It is easy money, and the participants of such experiment is normal, everyday, people people wanting to earn money. The problem comes when one of the rules to participate is to waive certain civil rights and when they warn us that we will be constantly monitored by cameras. Only with stand two weeks, you have your award, but you have to resist to the end.The first days are considered a joke, nobody takes his role seriously, but as they go through the days, everything changes brutally. Increasingly climate (aseptic, too "clean", it gives the feeling of being observing laboratory rats by a window), is becoming more claustrophobic, more heavy, and finally participants are becoming aware of the roles that have to play part of the experiment. Since they remember all the first day, peaceful coexistence so that everyone can reach the end and take their reward, they are happening, in the course of time the formation of leaders both on the side of the prisoners and the of the guards, small quarrels, which will increase, grow, up to become a monster that everyone escapes Manus and in an explosion of violence final, and converge in a belief of his roles, in such way that come to believe that this micro-mundo in which are living, is part of the reality.The only black point of the film: the somewhat absurd story of love has the protagonist made from flash backs and memories, that diverts attention from what is the main argument and really adds nothing interesting to the end result.Is of those movies returning to those suspense films that make you not pairs of legs move in the projection or that you not drop the hands of the arms of the Chair or armchair, full of nervousness and impatience, therefore, quite entertaining, with a surprise after another who manage us inmiscuyamos completely in the movie. Made to embarrass us, to draw conclusions about human behavior in extreme situations, and how about seemingly normal people in day to day they can become tyrants, cruel and aberrant beings.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/54

Vsancha

En la cuerda floja

muchocine

Good evening, I'm Johnny Cash

Slack the rope on which wanders the film only underpinned by the performances of its main protagonists grandisimas and a music to me personally I love. The biopic are fashionable and if they have much more the life of music legend, raze at the box office and especially in awards, last year was Ray Charles who inundated our screens with good jazz and we also had our own in Spain with shrimp. Now it is up to Cash make us enjoy the best country. Without a doubt the best of the film is the duo protagonist, Joaquin Phoenix, splendid as Johnny Cash and Reese Witherspoon that brings a sweetness to her character, June Carter, special (the Oscar is yours). There is a brutal chemistry between the two on screen that makes points the film to a clumsy and topical narrative with a perfectly structured script to move and thrill with the rise to fame and subsequent descent into the hell of drugs and the final redemption with the help of his beloved. But the film accomplishes perfectly and has good dose of entertainment, such as concerts with Elvis Presley, Jerry Lee Lewis, Carl Perkins, Roy Orbinson? No doubt an entertaining but insufficient film tribute to the Troubadour of the losers, with a custom sound between sad and melancholic sound of country music, the rebellion of rock and folk emotions, an authentic legend of American popular culture. But it could always be worse. "You you wear black that you didn't have another thing to put you, your music is so accidentally, and kiss me you were going to give has been unintentionally." "Once in a while you'd have to give you some merit".

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/907

Silvia

Pequeña miss sunshine

muchocine

Mid tender, funny, surreal moments as life itself.

"In this life there are two kinds of people: the winners and the losers." Do you know what's the difference? "That the winners fighting for what they want".The father of Olivia (Greg Kinnear) has very clear what the alleged recipe for success. As a good optimistic dreams of his family to achieve success and therefore supports his small daughter of seven years in its decision be submitted to a beauty contest child in which the winner is crowned as little Miss Sunhine.Toda the film focuses on the bumpy journey undertaken by this peculiar family in his dilapidated van to California , place where the contest is held. But as in all roadmovie self-respecting, the trip will change the lives of the (perfectly interpreted) characters and will strengthen the relationship between the members of the strange family.A family in which live a shameless and funny (Allan Arkin) grandfather addicted to drugs, a suicidal uncle, a brother that makes strike of silence until do not allow you to join a school of pilots, a mother of innocent personality (Tonny Collette) but which serves as a main axis of the family and an obsessive father with success. Paradoxically, the person that shows more mature family is the small Olivia (Abigail Breslin).The girl does not seem to quite fit into the prototype of beauty they seek in the contest (it has separate teeth and used huge glasses) but his dream is to become a model and shall strive our utmost to achieve this. Although the illusion sometimes wane and the girl will fall into the discouragement and feel unsuccessful. His grandfather explains that she is not an unsuccessful because "the losers are those who resign to try for fear to not get it" and she does not cease trying. With one nod to Proust in another of his scenes, the film shows us the triumph in life is something relative and that it does not have to match the image of success in society. A critique of fierce, seemingly lightweight of the American dream, represented in the obsessive father figure and beauty contests. The competitiveness of society sees exemplified in talent tests which are subjected the participants of the contest. Because society compels us to demand us increasingly more than ourselves, and leads to frustration front the successes of others. As raised the character of the little Olivia's brother, "life is a contest of beauty after the other".Despite the indisputable drama suggests, little Miss Sunshine is a tender, funny, surreal moments as life itself. Because life is full of moments in which we feel a few losers, and others in which the greatest triumph is to be ourselves.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2382

Silvia Giner

Shrek Tercero

muchocine

An animated film essential, with a perhaps not as good as in the 2nd soundtrack delivers but very valid and a very enjoyable pace, so it made me short.

Let's go do not be so hard critical puppy. It is amazing as it has improved graphically the life work and miracles of this good-natured OGRE than admitamosló, we love. Much has happened since that we saw for the first time the appearance of this character in the film, but despite all this time and above improved graphics, Sherk retains all its freshness, its ingenuity and originality.The writers of Sherk once more have hit the nail on, an excellent script, we live an excellent evening of cinema. The film meets the expectations expected and what I still hallucinating, is that form of combining "the moral" of life, of the tales. with a visual and verbal language absolutely current and intelligible for any type of audience (children, elderly, geeks).Characters such as Rasquitín or our beloved cat with boots and their looks delightful you will win certainly. New in this release we have a molotov cocktail of story characters that are masterfully introduced into the story. An animated film essential, with a perhaps not as good as in the 2nd soundtrack delivers but very valid and a very enjoyable pace, so it made me cut the movie.It could be that that in this film we have seen details of Sherk in his married life, its evolution as a character towards parenthood and the struggle to retain his emotional stability (values to be inculcated to the new generation of oafs approaching us) reveals a 4th sequel, as we are in the era of the sequels because miraat least of this type are expected and celebrated by his genius.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1502

Luis Zueco

Klimt

muchocine

Sad waste of money, effort and above all to a character, so special, so different than the inept that made this attempt to film.

This film to which followed the track since the end of last year when you had to be released, has been one of the biggest cinematographic disappointments of recent years. With a history like the life of Klimt, not needed nor invent delusions, hallucinations, or extravagant attitudes. It often happens that reality surpasses fiction, and in this case a figure so suggestive as of Klimt has devoured both director and actor who gives life, John Malkovich, who already thinks only his personal showcasing.With a scenario as the capital of the Empire earlier this century, with the first world war, with the universal exhibition in Paris and the artists there, with the movement of the Austrian secession, with Shiele and Klimt. With the sensuality of his art, the beauty of its allegories, with its unique style, with all of this. Why? Why does it take invent so many other things? Focus on things without importance with the sole intention to impress the spectator, which actually ends what is bored of so much mediocrity, while trying to see background of works by Klimt. Try to follow the film is impossible, because there is no such film, only a suction of scenes without any thread than one, only John Malkovic, never giving the size. In addition to be able to admire some of his works, and the continuous parade of naked women, little more there interesting in this film. And now I understand its delay and the fact that only project in two rooms of Madrid.Lamentable waste of money, effort and above all to a character, so special, so different than the inept that made this attempt to film. A missed opportunity to make a great movie. In addition it had been very well received in Madrid after two recent exhibitions there of his work in the capital and the Juan March Foundation in the Mapfre Foundation.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1965

Rafa Ferrer

Seduciendo a un extraño

muchocine

A film begins as round and just being square.

Lately the wisdom of Miss Berry choice movies is very much in question, while the later interpreted in "Catwoman" is on the decline and connects failure with failure as who ata a long cord, this time, and by joining another cord to the Strip, returned to do the same, accompanied of an already "viejuno" Bruce Willis, in narrow Thrillerthat puts in a home all the meat on the grill and the end is lost in a thousand byways that little matter to us and which end up being heavy, boring, little important and seen on more than one occasion, so a boat soon comes me to mind the tape starring Antonio Banderas and Rebecca Mornay "Never talk to strangers" how it relates to this that brings us a thousand Parallels.James Foley famous for legendary the who's that girl? He starred in a Madonna jovencisima, here lost the roles as a director, not getting or print the pace at which the film needs, or with good casting that has, do the most minimum to get a good result to the tape, disservice the script, that makes him more than surprise bored and sucks.In short, a tape starts being round and it just being square.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4075

Francisco Bellón

En el valle de Elah

muchocine

In the Valley of Elah, the new masterpiece of Paul Haggis, dissects with great poise, restraint and without a drop of cynicism the devastating effects of the Iraq war in American society.

Less than four years ago, Paul Haggis caused an earthquake in the world of cinema with Crash, his first film as director. From one of the scripts more humane, exciting and full of truth of recent years, Haggis built one of those memorable films, which are themselves in film history, and remain in the collective memory.After a few years in which has developed over his facet as writer, leaving its mark in films such as flags of our fathers, letters from Iwo Jima or Casino Royale, Paul Haggis presents his second film as director. Entry you have to praise the courage of Paul Haggis to deal with something so hard and thorny as the war in Iraq, roundly view from the perspective of young soldiers coming home. The research that a father carries out to unravel the mysterious disappearance of his son is used by Haggis to portray an American living content of war horror and the terrible consequences on those who participated in it. And does so without looking distorted the facts count, rejecting the bombast and focusing on a small community, a microcosm that refelja the reality of society as a whole. It is a harsh and harrowing, film that has moments of an extraordinary emotion, capable of putting out of breath up to the coldest Viewer. And when the story seems to have concluded, Paul Haggis gives that wonderful flat end, which sums up the feeling of the film. Of course, interpretative level of the tape is very high, with some extraordinary Tommy Lee Jones, Charlize Theron and Susan Sarandon.En the Valley of Elah, Paul Haggis's new masterpiece, dissects with great poise, restraint and without a drop of cynicism the devastating effects of the Iraq war in American society. It's a great film, bashed in his country and unjustly forgotten face award.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4154

Carlos Giacomelli Puig

Juno

muchocine

'Juno' is a positive, entertaining, fable and with charming characters. Thanks to a brilliant script, Reitman Gets an immediate connection with the audience.

More or less once a year, the indie film gets fashion with the appearance of a film that breaks lockers and awakens passions beyond where treads. "American Splendor", "Little Miss Sunshine", or "forget me!" are just a few examples so fruitful cinematographic current, whose quality has been amply demonstrated in the form of nominations and awards of all kinds, as well as the unanimous endorsement by critics and the public.Now it is the turn to "Juno", which continues the path of its predecessors (has four nominations for the Academy Award, including best picture and screenplay, and is one of the movies more views of the current American box office) becoming the success (in) waited of the year.Directed by Jason Reitman, the film introduces us to Juno MacGuff (Ellen Page, rather than convincing), a sixteen-year schoolgirl who becomes pregnant from one of her classmates (Michael Cera). Deciding to go ahead with the pregnancy, you are looking for a couple to adopt the baby when it is born, and is as well as meet the Loring (Jason Bateman and Jennifer Garner), seemingly happy and perfect marriage. But that depends on the point of view that look.At this point everyone knows what a movie like "Juno" can offer. Because if something characterises American independent cinema, is the excessive resemblance between his productions, primarily at the level of visual and auditory, although never cease to resemble each other many of the stories that they tell.Thus, the three minutes from the beginning of the film by Reitman, one has already stylish indie through a couple of acoustic songs in charge of Belle & sebastian or The Kinks, a few titles of entrance to the purest style "American Splendor", and a few levels so beautiful and austere as effective, impersonal.The same applies to the characters and the situation in which are involved. As in "Little Miss Sunshine" (to give just one example), no one in "Juno" stands out for its heroism or class, rather the opposite. They are normal and ordinary, nearby, people that happens to them something that could well happen to anyone, and any attempt to put solution.If outside, the protagonist can not remember Natalie Portman in "Something in common" (not only speak and think like, if not that up dressed very similarly), as well as the role of the could have played perfectly by Zach Braff.Entonces, what does this film for having received so much praise? Because, to date, the formula continues to operate perfectly. Because after all, what matters from a film is tells the story, and 'Juno' is a positive, entertaining, fable and with charming characters. Thanks to a brilliant script, in charge of (customer name) Diablo Cody, Reitman Gets an immediate connection with the audience, who immediately accepts the rules of the game and let it have fun and thrill in equal parts to the sound of a wonderful soundtrack.Of course much of this achievement is due to a few actors in State of grace, from the first to the last, with particular emphasis on the amazing Ellen Page, which shows that "Hard Candy" was not only a breath of inspiration, but especially in the prodigious couple Loring, a server is by far the best at all of the film.There will be some who complain of some depletion of the machine, but the truth is that more than one director would like to achieve so much, with so little. Simply exquisite.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3926

Carlos Giacomelli Puig

Alien vs Predator 2

muchocine

An invisible script prevents him from being at the height of the original sagas, but it is still a spectacular and entertaining reverential exercise.

After the immense success which saw the premiere of the "Alien versus Predator" (Paul W.S. Anderson) entertaining, it was expected that its sequel, reached the screens even taking into account the end blatantly opened the first.This time, those responsible for directing the function are brothers Colin and Greg Strause, until now designers of special effects for films like "300" or "Poseidon", which adapted a script of the fearsome Shane Salerno ("Shaft", "UC: Undercover" series).A ship Predator crashes on Earth, releasing several facehuggers (go, creatures similar to hands that adhere to the face of the dam to deposit an embryo inside), and the powerful PredAlien, a monstrous crossing between two alien races causative of the accident to kill all the crew Predator.En the planet of predatorsthe collision not overlooked and immediately sends a Hunter to Earth to eliminate any trace of the ship, the PredAlien, and the other Xenoformos that have been reproduced. Thus, while the Alien are devoted to kill any human that is put in front left and right, returns to begin the hunt, the struggle for racial supremacy.Many changes can be seen in this film in relation to the previous delivery. In fact, it almost looks managers re-confirmed from the original "AvP", which he criticized above all the lack of clashes between the beasts that give title, and the almost total absence of blood.On this occasion struggles are constants and, above all, much longer. In addition, violence has increased, by placing the action in an inhabited village, the human victims are literally countless. Just look at the first few minutes to confirm the intentions of managers: two human deaths, adding to the already mentioned fight causing the crash of the ship, including no less than a child (see suffer childhood tends to be something unheard of in American action films).Another great decision which had the tape of Anderson was a wastage of well-known sagas offer. "AvP" was a normal and ordinary, survival that well could have been starring a brand new alien species. Clearly, the Strause brothers are much more fans so well known bugs, since his film is a constant nod to the mythical works of Scott Cameron, McTiernan and company, with almost identical to the original moments. Any lover of the original sagas will enjoy of greatly with the House that moves slowly away from the terrified eyes of actors and gradually goes up to teach us the flayed by a victim of the Predator, the water attacks the Alien, or with clashes between these and the army. Even some of the phrases are taken directly from its precursor.Such is the attempt to distance itself from the original "AvP", which even chooses here to renew the physiognomy of the aliens. Thus, the Alien approaching greatly which are designed to "Aliens." "The return" (James Cameron), while the Predator leave the armor looked in the first part.But we do not release bells on-the-fly. Because if something do seem to the (so far) two deliveries, is that lack of a minimally decent script. Between homage and tribute, the story told is bland and predictable, with absolutely incoherent situations and characters flat and inconsequential. None has nothing that makes it worthwhile, to the point of be so bothersome that the viewer will want their deaths impatient. There is some decent action, a link between character and public, but to round out the slaughter Reiko Aylesworth (of the series "24") could at least be and company complete some too apathetic and amazing work. This means that, after several early and spectacular ten minutes, the film within its more tedious stretch with the presentation of each of them.Fortunately, it's just twenty minutes, because just after the action is reactivated and turns into a maelstrom of persecution, fights and death (the double beheading and impalement with a disc of tips are spectacular), who certainly do not have any sense, but in the end is what one wants to see before productions as well.Thus, "Aliens versus Predator: Requiem" meets its goal of entertaining and correct the mistakes of the previous delivery. Increases the dose of fighting and violence, while you delight any fan of the universe formed by Xenoformes and predators showing an infinite succession of tributes. An invisible script prevents him from being at the height of the original sagas, but it is still a spectacular reverential exercise.And the end, as it could not be otherwise, open to one more possible third party.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2673

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Snake eyes (Ojos de serpiente)

muchocine

There is no harmony between image and content. It is not a very good movie because it disregards the plot and the emphasis in the marvelous, Yes, elegant and addictive collection of images from the master of Palma.

In the unlikely event that someone had the idea of doing a remake of Snake Eyes, am almost predict a resounding thud, a now it more than likely disaster of foreseeable consequences. What happens is that Brian de Palma is an amazing director and knows his craft as sufficiently well enough to compensate for the narrative shortcomings with a prodigious operation of the camera or a hypnotic dance of absolutely disturbing scenes. It does not move us go advance the plot but the muscled choreography montage. Does not absorb us the interpretation of its cast (do Nicolas Cage is last lap, above all in the first twenty or twenty-five minutes and Gary Sinise is reckless, as alien to what? little - that is cooked) or nor the brilliance of the story but the syncopated chained of situations and environments that leave you, in the armchair, violated, given to this massive mess that it is not possible to exit without any wound in self-esteem or consideration alien.That David Koepp (do Jurassic Park, Carlito? s way, the war of the worlds, the next Spider-man or the next Indy) firm fiasco does not exonerate the signatories. The plot is simple, has no hook and is denying itself until you reach a final disastrous, unworthy of what we saw in the fantastic start of the film.The technique to return to recount events already occurred and, therefore, seen, but housed in another point of view (viva Tarantino) advises the trend of De Palma to become pure ego kept in an exercise of personal statement engolosina by its visual proposal - histrionic, effervescent, Baroque - but decaying his films by his (occasionally) disinterest in literary.We are left with priceless images (those first minutes so highly recommended or the vibrant persecution of a girl by the two protagonists from a room of a casino to the adjoining hotel room). Also with a magnificent soundtrack (Sakamoto). After: I tedio, deception, that feeling of bittersweet have had a good meal, but be sure that digestion is going to be complicated. Nevertheless, this chronicler enjoyed with the eloquence of the images, with its plasticity boredom-proof.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2329

Rafa Delgado

Jarhead

muchocine

An interesting proposal, but disappointing and somewhat deflated, it stays in something correctito, but forgettable. I expected much more of Mendes.

Does Sam Mendes seems an interesting and with a style director in storytelling quite attractive, which pulled out to perfection in?Do American Beauty?, and who then improved even more with?Road to perdition?. Was his next job?Do do Jarhead?, film in the first Gulf war, where American soldiers are waiting orders in the desert of Saudi Arabia. maybe the only thing attractive in my opinion of?Jarhead? they are the actors, and the signing of Mendes, which its essence, so present in his two other works already mentioned, seems to have vanished in this last, though it appears in some master sequences (that you can count on the fingers of one hand, by the way). Jake Gyllenhaal and Jamie Foxx are splendid, brutal, monsters. Worst of all is that the film becomes too long, and as not account anything, as that is a kind of deflated balloon that fails to petar because two people do not want (Gyllenhaal and Foxx).In short: an interesting proposal, but disappointing and somewhat deflated, it stays in something correctito, but forgettable. And it is that you expected me much more of Mendes, after those two PE-LI - CU-LO-NES which were?American Beauty? and?Road to perdition?.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/874

Dragon negro

El perfume

muchocine

Really well made and staged that despite running a time of downturn meets expectations and it did not disappoint the fans of the book, a shame from being one step away from being a great movie.

Jean-Baptiste Grenouille was born in the neighborhood more smelly and dirty Paris, amid the debris of a fish market and is abandoned by his mother. Collected by a hospice and brought up in the, soon realize that it is not equal to the rest of children. And it is that he has an extraordinary sense of smell that makes them special and different. Later sold to a Tanner of hides, passed his childhood and adolescence to survive in a bad way. One day, attracted by the smell of a beautiful woman, will discover that his mission in life is the capture the smell of things and preserve it. His eagerness to create the perfect perfume takes you to commit murders of beautiful women to use their smell, once distilled, as ingredients.Tom Tykwer is responsible for directing this European overproduction, with a great staging and characterization of a dirty and nasty Paris, also get, and was not easy to make credible, grim and distant to Jean-Baptiste, the interpretation of Ben Whishaw manages to convey all that and create a repulsive character and at the same time connecting with the viewer and awakens a feeling of worth despite their atrocities.Tykwer opts for a fidelity to the book worthy of praise, but that in turn is what makes the film at times somewhat weary and too long. There lies its virtue and its defect. Its virtue because anyone who enjoyed the book, myself included, are grateful has occurred the story as it is and suffered changes are really few. And failing because the adaptation of a book of such a scale is an excessive length, especially in the second half, reaching have moments in which one begins to look at the clock.This is because to fail to keep the continued interest on the film during its footage, as the film combines moments really achieved, especially in the first half, which is practically perfect and gets you to flying, where attended the birth and life of Jean-Baptiste and come to become adjutant of the decorative Baldini, with Dustin Hoffman in a short but great role. But it starts to wane upon his arrival in Grase, where he began his career of killings, which the film resolves rapidly and contrasts with scenes somewhat slow in their attraction to the young Laura, a young Rachel Hurd-wood of great beauty and precious eyes.As I am one who at the time enjoyed the book, I cannot, despite everything, pleased by the choice taken to be faithful to the book, above all to an end. A truly breathtaking scene and where it shows that the film is a European production, that I am quite sure that we had a final much more toned from being a Hollywood film, despite the fact that also did me something elongated and that it might be ridiculous depends of look at it, although to my I liked.A really well made and staged film that despite having some time in downturn complies with the expectations and not disappoint fans of the book, a shame from being one step away from being a great movie.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1821

Iñaki Bilbao

Nuestro hombre en la Havana (Our man in Havana)

muchocine

How Carol Reed not needed to Orson Welles to get a small masterpiece.

Very good and funny movie of Carol Reed, a great director who unfairly has been relegated to a second-order, to believe for many years that his best film "the third man" was actually directed by Orson Welles, something only in a small part true. Before us is beautifully directed and performed.Alec Guinness is superb, the film has a wonderful scene, very good use of the Cinemascope release, with a beautiful black and white photography. Fine English humor that is intoxicating, and acerados dialogue and double-edged. In sum, a film where one is at all times with a smile on your mouth, when not with the grateful laughter. If you have the opportunity to see this little masterpiece, Miss it will be a very bad idea.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/429

Enrique Colmena

United 93

muchocine

Do made with nerve and tone? cinema verité?, with a nervous camera on his shoulder, which in this case is fully justified. Quality, honesty and rigour.

We are in the days in which commemorates the fifth anniversary of the tragic events of September 11, 2001, when several Islamic fundamentalists hijacked planes destroyed the two twin towers in New York, and part of the Pentagon in Washington. For these purposes, the collapse of the Workd Trade Center can compare with the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo, causing the spark that would lead to the first world war. Of course, the New York drama was infinitely more seriously, not only because of the thousands of human lives lost, but because instantly transmitted "urbi et orbi", produced a huge trauma at the global level, not to mention within American society itself. As often happens in these cases of very strong emotional upheaval, has taken some time so the USA film dares to put in images that national catastrophe, whose consequences later (call the disastrous invasion of Iraq and the polarization of the world in Islamic East and the Christian West faced each other, although they do not want to admit it, a new covert war whose outcome is unpredictable) have had occasion to see during these years. "United 93" (also "World Trade Center", Oliver Stone, without brand new in Spain when writing these lines) is the first approximation in cinema to that ill-fated day, and tells a plausible reconstruction of what might have happened on the fourth plane hijacked by Muslim fundamentalists, United Airlines 93, which is only known that you crashed in Pennsylvaniaclose to achieve its goal, the Capitol or the White House. As there were no survivors, Paul Greengrass, screenwriter and director, has made a reconstruction based on interviews with loved ones of the deceased, crew and passengers, and in your recent calls to their families, friends and loves. Made with nerve and tone "cinema verité", with a nervous camera on his shoulder which in this case is fully justified, and using little-known actors that there no rift in the spectator, Greengrass makes a stimulating work, hour and a half which reproduces those long hours in the morning of 9-11, when the world lost the innocence and New York went from being happy and confident city to a sullen city thatat least in the early days, he distrusted everything and everyone. It is true that perhaps in the Greengrass film abused the scenes set in the control of American airspace flight, and not say sequences shot in the military stays trying to understand and tackle those unusual events, with a jargon often only to initiates. But is also true that, when it comes to the truth, and the crew and passengers realize that going to the slaughterhouse, the film momentum grows (I better not say "raises the flight" do, as it will weld metaforizar in these cases?) and becomes a thrilling race against time, much more shocking that we know what happened in that plane was authentic and that the end is none other than the death of all that the they occupied. That documentary tone especially suits this last stretch, with passengers killed of fear but willing to fight for their lives. By the way that this is a success of Greengrass as a writer: when the tragedy occurred, was speculated that the crew and passengers, to realize that would be scrambled against some emblematic building, as had happened with the other aircraft, decided qualms that not happen; Greengrass opts for another possibility, perhaps less heroic but more likely: according to the same passengers rioted because they wanted to regain command of the aircraft, counting among them with a small plane pilot. It is certainly less bombastic, but it is a very plausible view: rather than thinking about crashing without killing others, thought that they could save their lives if they take the controls before they crashed them. Well is that the American film begins to exorcise the ghosts of the 11-S; already did, and with a result of whatever stripe, with the Viet Nam Guerra. Hopefully whatever is done about that unlucky day have, at least, the same level of quality, honesty and rigor to this dramatic, tense, stinging film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2428

Rafa Ferrer

Harry Potter y la orden del Fénix

muchocine

Tape more than Potter and only remaining 2 to its final, it will please fans, and it horrorizará that have never stopped or even to read the books

As I promised, and despite work this week on night shift, and having slept only 3 short hours, as a good fan of Potter and thanks to Muchocine.net and Warner, I came, almost giving me punched in the eyes, to the press of the 5th pass installment of the adventures of the wizard of the scar on his forehead.Say that the film follows the line of the above, I believe that it is the best way to give the kick-off to this, my opinion of the film, however, is far from that for me is the best tape in the series, the only led Alfonso Cuarón, much darker than the rest of the following tapes, whileOnce again, the press has airy that it was darker than the previous ones.It is nothing short of that curious that one of the longer books of J.K. Rowling has been brought to the screen in a tape of only 2: 10 min. duration, the shorter the tape of the "child magician" for the time being, and that the book had quite a few chapters that were little more than "straw" until the final beating.Entering the interpretive chapter, I would say that they are just "bad" <-eye to quotes, which I liked most see Gary Oldman (right that now understand the quotes?) on screen, on the one hand, and by another Helena Bohan Carter as Beatrix Lestrange and Ralph Fienness as "Who should not be named", as well as Imelda StautonIt manages to match the role of Dolores Umbridge of the book.So Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and Emma Watson are perfect in the roles that have led them to fame, and it shows the love that have, as you know give in packaging on screen that they require, moreover, Watson suggests ways to become a "face with Angel" and in a few years, if not timeWe will see more than followed on screen it, incidentally Radcliffe it will cost Dios and help remove the role of Potter above, for many works of theatre that makes naked.In terms of special effects!What would this film without them! Note that point to all kinds of CGI graphics animations, are you catching and both the Thestrals, such as Centaurs, transformations of Ninfadora Tonks as well as Grawp the giant brother of Hagrid, based, which gollum in the capture of actor Tony Maudsley movements are quite well made.Nicholas Hooper carried out an excellent work on the soundtrack, with a few touches that equate the tape musically speaking with original score by John Williams, I dare say that we are, with permission of the Williams, one of the best scores of the saga of Potter.En definite, a tape of Potter and only remain 2 to its finalIt will please fans and horrorizará who have never stopped or even to read the books.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/428

Illaq

United 93

muchocine

I have the impression that this is a great movie. I went to the cinema to see something "known". When I left the cinema, he had just seen something "new".

Today 5 years of terrible events which refers this film. Especially in North America, it has been discussed much about the advisability or not of the same. However, in view of the reception in the same United States given, it seems obvious that it has arrived in good time, the cinematographic work, both as a reminder of those who died in that sad, puzzling and unforgettable date. United 93 is a film whose outcome we know. There is, therefore, the game of the director with the Viewer to see if it hits the end. Thus, there are only two possibilities. The first, dealing with a sort of docudrama: a notarial acts that occurred dramatic story. The second, something similar to what I understand as the "essence" of cinema: telling a story through predominantly Visual elements. When turn off the lights of the room, almost without more ADO, we find ourselves in a hotel room in which some Muslims pray. They are young. Their faces express tension. Obviously, the Viewer, like them, knows the reason for the tension. But worldwide, the film world, not yet known. It is night. After dawn, young people are directed to the Newark Airport. The route, in a wall, is a great banner: "GOD BLESS AMERICA". "The other" also pray. In my view, the film revolves around a great contrast between the earlier and the later, between the before flight 93 and later, when, traveled the track, there is no turning back. The first scenes show men and women going to theirs. In the background, routines, comments without greater importance, the inner world of each one and that wishes to show to others. There are no heroes; There is neither good nor bad. They are not abstractions or cartoons; just ordinary people. Everything changes, but on the horizon of what predictable. Much of what happened on the plane that carried out this flight is unknown. It is known that at 9: 24 a.m. September 11, 2001, the Commander of the Flight 93 of United Airlines requested confirmation of an alert message that he had received. You know also that two minutes later, the hijackers beat in the cabin and took control of the aircraft, probably killing the pilots and a flight attendant. It is known that to the 03, once passengers broke the door of the cabin, the aircraft, a Boeing 757-222 crashed in a Pennsylvania field, killing all its occupants. Greengrass, based on various sources, including the official report and the testimonies of relatives, follows the course of the report, devoting most of the screen time to the period between the takeoff and the terrible moments immediately prior to the fall of the aircraft. If, at the time of take-off, the pace has been enough to keep the attention: jumps of characters to others, by way of presentation of these anonymous creatures, with their concerns, interests, hopes, more or less minor, by usual, pointing us already masterfully the nature of some of them, the takeoff marks the great transformation. Obviously, see us on the screen still do not know anything, but Greengrass and us Yes and therefore imposes a clear rhythm change. It is as if the race takeoff of the Boeing 757 indicate symbolically this acceleration to make vibrating. The viewer expects that "something happens" familiar, but the director maintains the tension of the spectator, inviting him to participate in fact, doing that you shelved what they know to enter into action, so that it transforms the question as to the "why" for the question "when". Not cease this new pace until the end of the film. The camera, which quickly jumps of characters to others, the natural dialogues, entrecortados, fragments that overlap each other, make copper narration a verisimilitude of reportage, without, however, losing its status as "film". But United 93 not only presents what happened on the plane; also shows the confusion, panic and chaos that attached to all those responsible for air traffic that morning, symbol - as it seems - confusion, panic and chaos which seized the "first world". Maybe the director thought that it would be too much lock ourselves in the aircraft cabin for the 35 minutes that mediate between the abduction of the apparatus and its end. Well because it difficult to maintain the narrative tension in a very minimal environment or perhaps because I would like to give us an overview of what happened that day, employs a narrative strategy always has given game in the film: the story of the "United 93" is the story of all those involved, through continuous and increasingly faster, cuts that come and go from the plane to air traffic controlsthe command of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) post and the command of the aerospace defense of North America (NORAD) command center, where people that there are (as the first world) trying to understand what is happening. While the camera jumps from one place to another, there are some faces that stand out: Ben Sliney, the director of operations directed at the FAA command center on 11 September 2001, one of nine persons of the FAA and the armed forces of the United States.UU. that are interpreted to themselves in the film; mayor James Fox in the Northeast sector of NORAD, and again asking where are the Chairman and the Vice-Chairman, highlighting the lack of leadership that became apparent that day. Of course, there are images of the two planes that crashed against the twin towers of the World Trade Center, but, in my opinion, I think that marginal notes are that could have been dispensed. In summary, I have the impression that this is a great movie. As I said at the beginning, I went to the cinema to see something "known". When I left the cinema, had just seen something "new" to a certain extent, a sample of cinematographer: still important facts as narrated and maintaining a credible fidelity to the actual events, I have not had the impression of seeing a documentary, but a constructed play so that the viewer enters the function, side by side with those in it involved, keep the attention constantly and enter into the atmosphere of tension that surrounds all the work. United 93 takes 115 minutes and has been written and directed by Paul Greengrass. Barry Ackroyd is, in my opinion, excellent director of photography. Music, adjusted to action anytime, was provided by John Powell. Tim Bevan, Eric Fellner, Lloyd Levin and the director have been producers. A curiosity of the translation: in a scene for the NORAD command center (prepare for a fictional tactical exercise), an officer refers to the "Russian bears will enter by Alaska". Obviously alludes to the Russian bombers Tupolev TU-95, whose name in code which NATO is Bear. Recommended audience: it is easy, anyone who likes the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3545

Andrés Pons

Evil Spawn

muchocine

This film doesn't fool anyone that from their debtors it tell you clearly, this is a frika performed in a couple of days with a script that was written in a night of drunkenness where the photography, music, address is conspicuous by its absence.

This film doesn't fool anyone that from their debtors it tell you clearly, this is a frika performed in a couple of days with a script that was written in a night of drunkenness where the photography, music, address is conspicuous by its absence.I tell you from sharing because as soon as you see the name of the director you you remember other products his "DR ALIEN, the House in the middle of the road". Performers are those who point to all folly shaped film to win the chickpeas.GORDON Mitchell "Mission cobra, SHE" or RICHARD HARRISON "NINJA Holocaust" accompanied by actresses from very good to see that they live undress in stronger direct to DVD.If quality is expected with all the great professionals their story will see KUROSAWA that is not for your stomach. If by the upset they want to see sex, GORE, ass of infarction, operated breasts and some special effects that cause laughter sit to enjoy the art of exploitation without damage.Because that is another, the film happily copy everything which moves through Reanimator to fly with doses of Alien. Look where in the midst of madness filmmaker "is a saying" it is so hot dog pounding mercilessly the scene of HOLLYWOOD and the vanity of their stars, in a review I more would like her to productions of greater artistic value without the freshness of this series Z.Es fun if you see without complexes.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/66

Tito Chinchan

Crash

muchocine

A very tough film with a masterful script and an incredible development

There are very good, good, bad, very bad films, signals, etc. There are films that appeal to a group of people with certain criteria, these same to another group makes them vomit. But there are movies that, regardless of whether you like or not, you have to say "what peliculón". This is one of them.The film is about the different racial factions in the city of Los Angeles. A collision of initial car, leads to a plot incredible how people interact and as each of our acts ends up triggering some events or other. A xenophobic police, another pardillo, a pair of black thieves, a pair of white "respectable", an inspector with ideals, a good Hispanic, a Persian (Iranian) a little schizophrenic, etc. Each and every one of them is related to a specific event of the film. And that is all about.It is impossible to explain this film. This must be seen. It gives very bad feeling, during almost all of it, to the point of wanting to stop seeing her. But I have to take off the hat and say, often peliculón. The plot is intertwined in an incredible way, without making heavy but it is distressing. The actors are sublime, in roles of horrible people that have been absorbed by an unjust and cruel city. And the script is great, do more I can say?In short, a very tough film with a masterful script and an incredible development. Just a nice scene, in which I cried like a Magdalene. That wonder.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1542

Ramón Balcells

Juegos secretos

muchocine

Inspire in that they inspire, Todd Field has a unique, special movie, cuativadora, sensitive and atrapadora.

I love this kind of movies that seem to be one thing and end up becoming another, wholly or partially different. With Little Children (or secret games, if the preferéis) is exactly the same. The promotion made about the movie was excellent hand, but on the other hand, empty, as it only seemed to address an issue: the love triangle. Although fortunately the bestial Todd Field film is much more than that: it is a choral, intimate, strange, frightening and exciting film.What stands out most is the wonderful script, based on the novel by Tom Perrota and written by this same and director. Perhaps the only thing that takes away points in favor (very few) is already directed by Sam Mendes-American Beauty in which, rather than inspire, takes note of it, without copying it at any time, clear. But there is also another thought, is that secret games as a reference (at times) to the novel by Cheever, Madame Bovary (which was mentioned during one of the best parts of the movie). Inspire in that they inspire, Todd Field has a unique, special movie, cuativadora, sensitive and atrapadora. One of the most interesting resources of the script is that magnetic and quasi perfect voice-over, which leads to the film until they almost disappeared, so that we see with our eyes, the fatal outbreak of an outcome, which will soon be "helped" by this mysterious voice. So I have to congratulate his writers for work impeccable, worthy of veterans, although Field is not.If the secret games script is wonderful, we would say that the direction close to perfection. Yes, it seems that me is going on with the movie, but it is what to me has seemed: practically, a masterpiece. Minimalist and overwhelming at the same time, the direction of Todd Field manages to catch us with an incredible force up let us facts powder once completed the film. Not only that, but the splendid and original montage accompanies the film to be precise, exact. It has, the movie, a couple or three of really impressive sequences, as the swimming pool, the park or the aforementioned discussion on the novel Madame Bovary. It is precisely these scenes which enrich the film and make it be perfectionist, unique. As I said earlier, this is a choral film, in which, apart from a love triangle (narrated with an incredible pulse), appear stories of a pedophile (the best of all of them, no doubt) and a retired policeman who hides a terrible past. These three interesting stories of inhabitants of a neighborhood of medium class of Massachusetts combine unexpectedly reaching a child conclusion (in the good sense, although only entendedor if the film has been) where more than one life collides in extravagant way.There was not, at least for me, best title to Little Children to this movie. As you come to understand during the footage, adults behave like their own children, or of a child way and without much sense (tuned to the scene of the station with Patrick Wilson). SPOLIER LIGHT! This moral to reach to fully understand one time ends the film, when the protagonists reject their dreams and ambitions to return with what they have more security (their children, in this case). And behold, probably one of the best quotes of the film (the daughter of Winslet's intentándo soothe his mother, what should be the other way around). END OF THE SPOLIER.Interpretations of secret games could be a synonym of prodigious. Perhaps this film with best performances from Crash, which I find some similarities (SPOLIER!!!!) (Emmerich helping Haley or Dillon helping Newton), the cast is absolutely credible, sensational, close. Although, in all of them, would highlight the immense Kate Winslet, the best role of her career, which seems more a girl that not an adult; Jackie Earle Haley, an interpretation that is outstanding, perfect, terrifying and painful. Perhaps the best role of the film, since it had been never before treated a pederast with such depth; Noah Emmerich, where especially shines in the denouement of the film; Phyllis Somerville as the mother of the paedophile, in a tremendously appealing role, because very few times had been the family of a child molester in a film, and the truth is that it is arguably tragic. They highlight not so much, interpretations of Patrick Wilson and Jennifer Connelly are also great, but perhaps do not reach the perfection of the other roles are somewhat more empty.In short, he claimed that secret games rubs the master being one of the best films of the year early. Some may have another detail that is a both failed, as the speed and excessive hectic that is used in the outcome, but this is just to mention something "bad". I did not see in the room (the previous and first film of Todd Field), but there is no doubt that, having seen this wonder, me the I think rent at least. An absolutely incredible film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2741

Kiko de España

El Infierno vuelve a Frogtown

muchocine

What begins as a descojones ends up coming out of mother and touching the "Landismo" but you expect, do Hamlet?

Roddy Piper is Sam Hell in this post-apocalyptic comedy in which mutants, a few frogmen not term to understand as they are called, (the copy of it looked very well, but the audio stank), are the main threat of the man.The case is that the first fifteen minutes are the comedy anthology and the close-ups of the prota are great, is a species of the snake Plissken but cowardly and gordo.Hell is the only man on Earth who has not been sterile and the main hope of humanity.Clear, women are prickly and want to grab him, but takes a shell in its parts can fly into a thousand pieces that reserved you for fertile women güays. What begins as a descojones ends up coming out of mother and touching the "Landismo" but you expect, do Hamlet?The mid-term onwards it rubs the unbearable and the laughs are forgotten. Painfully bad.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2946

Bloody Will

Un Corazón Invencible

muchocine

Tape that this stage of the year seems to me almost perfect. A jewel among so much garbage millionaire and is able to with your images that you feel the emotion and pain of the main protagonist.

Well who I would say: the first movie of Angelina Jolie that I like in years?Daniel Pearl, journalist of?The Wall Street Journal? He disappeared on January 23, 2002 to investigate radical Islamic groups and their links with the terrorist network Al Qaeda in Pakistan. In February of 2002 Pakistani police received the video of the execution of the journalist, which still circulates on the internet, and wasn't until 16 may when found body decapitated on the outskirts of Karachi. Impressive history, and similarly it has resulted in the screen.Michael Winterbottom (? does 24 hour party people?) he has done a great job to print the feeling that history, deserves this drama (finally) ceases to be the typical Hollywood product to deal with the drama of the Pearl if they release a documentary, and with that I am not saying they are going to flood data, dates or political issuesmuch less?A mighty heart? It is a film which tells a story of unconditional love truncated by stupid fanaticism without bore us explaining how many terrorist groups there are in Pakistan, or who are the good and bad.I have to say that without doubt the use of flashbacks to tell in a way parallel the final journey of Daniel Pearl and the intense search for Mariane print to tape a pace which would have easily been void in case of first having the kidnapping of journalist and later the two months of investigations and interrogation until the fateful outcome.With how easy that was falling into the cakes melodrama of a pregnant woman who collapses when her husband is going to die insurance, the result is the opposite: a woman who fights without barely shed a tear to pull the wire and reach the captors of her husband, while maintaining an unprecedented strength. He is appreciated.All the credit goes to Angelina Jolie. Do chop jumbles has marked the actress for that now, under the production of Brad Pitt, firm his best role since?Do girl, interrupted?, there is nothing. Imitate the French accent is often a genuine jod ** nda for who gets involved in a role that it requires, but Jolie makes it as natural that only you know. The reaction of the protagonist when he receives the news of the death of her husband is a scene so round that I was her he recorded Jolie in the butt to remind you that there are roles that are worthwhile. It is brilliant, and I promise that I never thought that I could use bright and Jolie in the same sentence.Now that you know that if are you looking for the truth about why Daniel Pearl was murdered it is not going to find in the film. In the film is given to understand that it was the Jewish status of Pearl and even because they confused it with an agent of the CIA, however investigations that the journalist was still two months after the attacks of 9-11 are the cause of that is now tell their story, but of course, one thing is to make a film with few Mexico claims and other is condemning it to eliminate the Chambers at the first opportunity.Anyway, leaving the inaccuracies in the script that are imperceptible to us that we do not live the media barrage mounted in the USA, we have a tape that at this stage of the year seems to me almost perfect. A jewel among so much trash millionaire and told through the eyes of a director, which marks a before and after in his filmography, and is able to with your images that you feel the emotion and pain of the main protagonist.It has caught me at a very low point, or possibly is the very best that premiered in months in the Spanish charts.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3302

Jack Torrance

The invasion

muchocine

The end product is a correct thriller science fiction with quite a few moments of terror and tension, although it's not absolutely I anodino, if that is quite irrelevant.

The current socio-political State in the world is a suitable breeding ground for the horror movies & science fiction, always reflects the climate of his time, including images that are significant of the events globally in the time in which it was created. However the current study films have cut wings and believe that the imagery of the film has to do with the collective subconscious is something naive, because what really moves the production of such films is profitable business. So, we have before us a new Remake: the fourth version of "Invasion of the body snatchers" called simply invasion. What a priori may be little right, given the relative closeness of the new version in the 1990s, becomes suggestive thanks to the situation of dementia and paranoia in which we live submerged. Unfortunately the interesting Olver Hirschbiegel director's vision has been mutilated and overhauled to conform to more complacent parameters. The merits of the film are concentrated in scattered moments that make suspicious are isolated scenes shot by the original director. However, the final product is a correct thriller science fiction with quite a few moments of terror and tension, although it's not absolutely I anodino, if that is quite irrelevant. There are several details that resemble a good independent film, with characters and unusual performances in the big Blockbusters, and there are several things it does well they resemble the previous works of the director of "The sinking", do not have continuity during the film. In general, the moments in which the invasion is taking shape are well developed and manage to reflect the phenomenon on a global scale in an effective way. The passages in which the protagonist realizes that something has changed and how has to not be discovered are also successful. The best of this new version is how definitively accepted that invasion really mean a possible change for good, and raises the question of whether really worth that the human race continues to exist.This is exemplified very well on a subtle level ending in the eyes of Nicole Kidman to teammate when everything seems to be remitido(un_final_que_huele_a_imposición_de_hollywood).A look that uncovers their sense of possible mistake. would not have been better to have been left to carry? is perhaps the most radical idea posed by this new version, which in the Fund, despite the final Hollywood aftertaste, is much more pessimistic others, considering that humans have no salvation from ourselves. Despite its many successes, the film, as a whole it is a failed experience. A montage of abrupt, without any kind of course makes the first minutes of the tape something that doesn't seem to be what he really wants. Sequences cut by a pattern that does not correspond to what it seems they wanted to translate to shoot them, as if needed few seconds more to ensure that they function correctly. If we add to this stupid and unnecessary flashbacks, horrendous infographics plans of targeted cells and a narrative drift due to the "inserts" the Wachosky, have a fresco of what not to do in a movie, right next to scenes that are within the best of the year. A monstrosity that simply can be seen and doesn't bother too, but that leaves a sediment of bitterness for not be able to see the original version as it was conceived. Perhaps this does not improve the present and even be too bland. But n invasion there are too many signs that are sensed a good movie that someone has tried to turn into something else. The result is a light work, passion without claw, but nor is any disaster and manages to entertain enough to Miss viewing.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3376

Rafa Ferrer

Cube Zero

muchocine

Entertaining movie and prequel of cube, where either by remotely approaching the quality of l °, but it has seemed better than the 2nd.

Entertaining movie and prequel of cube, where either by remotely approaching the quality of l °, but it has seemed better than the 2nd. Very few things we clarify on the cube, but we have an idea of because they are the chosen people cube (not all). I think that it's the chip in the head of the soldiers have left. At least can take the same environment that the first part (is that the second is so bad). In fact there are moments where I felt quite identified with the film (which I also work of operator) and see "operators of the cube" has made me see things I usually do in my job quite often. If you like Cube think you spend a fun with this time. It has an ending that could be a loop with the first part.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1322

Marta

Babel

muchocine

Get show with coherence and without superficiality completely different worlds, narrate tragedies without falling into sentimentality and transmit tenderness despite all the imperfections and mistakes of the characters.

Finally I've labeled "Babel" of the list, it was time. And I was delighted; undoubtedly one of the best movies I've seen lately. Alejandro González Iñárritu's first feature film, "love dogs", I liked a lot - not "21 grams", that left me something cold - but "Babel" surpasses all that. I understand that it is quite long. I dunno, to me I went flying. The four stories had me completely hooked until the end. The Japan, despite being possibly the least "tragic" and the more desligada of the rest - or precisely - why, I touched especially by this way to portray a much less obvious drama. Interpretations of the actors are spectacular. It is also the agility and, above all, humanity with which the director has put in scene this magnificent but difficult, script by Guillermo Arriaga. Among all have managed to show consistency and without superficiality completely different worlds, narrate tragedies without falling into sentimentality and transmit tenderness despite all the imperfections and mistakes of the characters. For a change, I had to do bent. How occur to someone bending this film? I suppose it would have been even better in the original version, but in any case, "Babel" won that increasingly more difficult as the years pass. I left the cinema excited, "played", feel different to as had entered and reflecting on what he had just seen. And why I recommend her you do not let pass.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1096

Dino

Rocky Balboa

muchocine

The film is not worth much, but at least not ashamed as the poker of absurdities that Stallone launched after the overwhelming success of the original.

The film is home to the legends. The celluloid are born, grow, multiply with unnecessary sequels and you prequels, and if one day they die, is that they never deserved similar consideration. We see characters with which we would like to have a drink, to which we would like to get to know, and that they probably felt a special affection. For a generation, Rocky Balboa is a legend. Belatedly, for me also. And Yes, influences my particular passion for boxing and the film subgenre that has created this sport. I am of thrill me with Paul Newman in "Marked by hatred", by Robert de Niro in "Wild Bull", and even Russell Crowe in "Cinderella Man". "Nod for Robert Ryan in" The Set-Up ", of the master Robert Wise.""Rocky" (1976) us (I) touched as the typical story of a normal type of the heap by pulling little thing. It was a character who was offered a fistful of dollars so a boxing champion won three times and engordara his pride. It cost spun four consecutive sentences. He was shy, but with a clever point, more for his innocence than anything else. But above all, it rose to a ring knowing that it was going to take a beating. Gave him equal. Because in that wonderful film of John g. Avildsen, Rocky taught us that many times not importantly win in this life, but keep you standing and endure the stakes when it hits hard, let him know that you are not afraid and that shall pass over yours earlier that throw the towel. "The victory is not a title, but an emotional state.""Rocky Balboa" is a shadow of that wonder of 1976. 30 Years have passed. And the film has the same pattern that the four continuations who tried to exploit the story of unhappy that conquest glory without success. They were garbage, designed to make money with a myth, mistakenly thinking that they though the legend. Da nausea remind Rocky incorporated in the trousers with the colors of USA sticking with that meaner Russian Ivan Drago. Now, there is an old, decadent, type who lives tell war stories in his restaurant, widower, and just needs to feel alive again. The film is not worth much, but at least not ashamed as the poker of absurdities that Stallone launched after the overwhelming success of the original.This does not make you cry. Just takes you to remember when Rocky listened, in the last moments of the first film, and with the unmistakable melody of Bill Conti's background, the "ring announcer" by Victor gave Apollo Creed, but his sole concern was to embrace with the fragile Adrian, that presence lurks "Rocky Balboa" and is not anywhere. Stallone pays homage to himself, or perhaps it simply seeks to that, keep alive a legend not seeing its present, but giving reasons to recall the past. You can look for transport then the emotions his film not already raised. However, it remains within decent formally. That is the spirit of Rocky, the "Italian Colt", though it may not of his films. Long live the legend, champion.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3789

José A. Peig

Hook

muchocine

Synthesizing, the irregularity predominates in this film at all levels, while being an interesting magical tale about innocence lost and recovered, a product of entertainment that drinks from the musical and the disneyano universe.

Peter Banning is the model of the materialistic and stressed man who only lives for his work. In our society today there is much talk of children abandoned by irresponsible parents who have forgotten childhood, and implying having children and care for their needs. His son Jack reminds him that his problem is fear to fly, which goes beyond the literal interpretation in the filmic text (fear to go flying out of the window of the plane), as was already implicit in the original work of James Barrie; fly means to break the shackles with schemes, obligations and conventions of adults. Be a child does not mean to be irresponsible, but free, innocent and a bit malicious. Peter asks his son Jack to stop being a child and when the family comes to London to visit the home of Wendy, this requires a unique condition:!Children, let grow.! For Peter Banning it is already too late, even recalls his childhood and, moreover, the Wendy grandmother tells us one of the central themes: Peter, you've become a pirate. The pirate is a symbol of aggressive man that eyebrow not reaching their financial benefits at the expense of whatever. The subsequent sequence emphasizes that connection with a marked dream-like tone. London becomes a sinister city and nestled in the past, while Peter Banning ascends the stairs that lead up to the fourth child, - the old room of Wendy, John and Michael - and once inside he meets the image of the pirate ship and Captain Hook profile drawn on the walls of the room. Now, Peter and hook are one only. Banning is that kind of men that builds a wall of isolation to its around to ensure the material success, losing part of their humanity and deteriorating relations with his wife and children. The viewing of Spielberg is direct and concise, and not devoid of dramatic intensity from a circumstantial elements in appearance: Banning, in the Hall of the House, talking on the phone with one of his co-workers, whose profile is situated on the left side of the image, and in the background his wife and children running around and trying to encourage Peter to play with them. But Peter does not know to play, only interested in the money. A mild contrapicado emphasizes the isolation of Peter with regard to his family the shadow Jack projected onto the wall grows in tune with the irritation of Peter, unless the situation explodes in the final reprimand. After the revelation of Wendy (you are Peter Pan!) and the subsequent appearance of the fairy Tinker Bell, Banning travel to the country of Neverland, where will soon encounter a captain hook that is expressed with continuous laughing and ironies, isolated from his men, depressed and tired himself and live in Neverland, and obsessed with meet the child who did not want to growonly that it can return to give a raison d ' être (here there is no adventure). Hook pain is worse when he discovers that Peter has become something very similar to himself; Cod!. You do not are not the shadow of Peter Pan. In the country of Neverland, hook is a character so pathetic, as flatulent and so cartoonish as it was Banning in the real world. There is the antithesis between Peter and hook, that is why many people say: that is not Peter Pan!, as also says the own Banning. If you want to recover their children, Peter needs to learn to play, to sleep in the trees, to fight with the sword, to use the imagination, Crow and fly. But lost, insensitive and innocent, children recognize the enemy: all adults are pirates. Death to the lawyer!. Indeed, for them, there is not much difference between a lawyer and a pirate. This cannot be Peter Pan!.!! However, when one of the children playing with the face of Banning, stretching with the hands the contours of his rigid face, appears in the face of Banning the magic and insolent grin of the eternal child. Hence these, Peter!.!! But it was an image held hands, forced to the skepticism of Banning. There to help him recover the spontaneity. For its part, hook discovers that the best way to take revenge and attract to Peter Pan is to make children of Peter want you, that the children will forget his family, that they understand that their parents hate their children. Hook does nothing more than make explicit and carried its maximum impact Banning isolation with regard to his family. The misfortune of a father is, in fact, have had children, statement that reflects an attitude which hook and Banning share an affinity. In the imaginary dinner, and motivated by the leader of the lost boys (Rufio), Peter is learning to play, use the imagination, forget about "good manners" and freedom from the conventions of the well educated and bored adult who had become. Going slowly recovering the insolence and freedom, while hook comes with the small Jack to the Museum of broken clocks, place where hook aims to stop time and invites Jack to destroy all the clocks that enslaves the conscience of the adult represented the father: for not letting me do bubbles in chocolate! for not letting me jump in bed! do never anything with me!. In short, hook, as analogous to Banning character, uses his knowledge on the slavery of adults to exorcise and free Jack's influence and bad memories associated with his father. The better know your opponent better know where must attack him. This is how hook culminates its plan to manipulate the mind of Jack. The pirate baseball game, Banning discovers that hook has supplanted him as Jack's father. This causes a reaction in the consciousness of Banning, seeing that he has lost his son. You do not value what you have until you lose them. I have to learn to fly!.!! Find out when the consequences of the bad father who has been - and what supposed to be an adult who has completely lost its connection with the original innocence - is when it feels real need to change and to recover all lost. An accidental blow to the head, Banning is approaching a bed and contemplates with amazement, reflected in the waters, the image of the child who did not want to grow (and much attention to how the music of John Williams highlights the magic of that moment, one of the best melodies of this great composer, perfect evocation of nostalgia and childhood recovered). In this film, the innocence contained - and is thus symbolized - in a cup (as in the original work of J.) (Barrie). In the interior of the tree that was built to Wendy, Banning placed the Cup on his finger. Wendy. A Cup is a kiss. The innocence. I remember!. And once more the music of Williams immerses us in the nostalgia (Wendy sat in the rocking chair while he burst socks and told us stories) and even for a few seconds, Banning children is the children of all. Banning relive the past to understand the present. Peter Pan wanted to grow because the granddaughter of Wendy, he met and fell in love with her, and wanted to give him a kiss, but a kiss of truth. When the lips of Peter include Moyra, the finger of Peter loses his Cup, and is rolling on the ground, as the lost innocence. Peter wanted to grow and be a father, and that happy thinking that will make you fly and be free. Contrary to the established handling by hook and reinforced hitherto in the attitude of Banning, paternity - assumed aware and responsibly - can be a source of freedom. I found my happy thought!. Banning, even under the guise of pirate, contradicts to hook, and then is drawn on his face, the smile of the child happy and insolent (looking directly at the camera), and begins to rise, and flies, and, in a burst of magic that accompanies the revival of youth and adventure, the gesture and the unmistakable silhouette of Peter Pan appears emerging from the branches of the tree (with its suit freshly made juices of tree leaves)(, symbol of freedom and innocence, shedding the guise of pirate that symbolized the corruption of the adult man who hates her children), the blue of the sea bottom, and Peter rises towards the Sun. Again, in this sequence that begins with Peter emerging from the branches of the tree and until his arrival in the Sun, the soundtrack of Williams reinforces the significance of the image with emotion and although alone they are three few seconds, by the magnificent visual execution and what it means in relation to the narrated above, the image of the reborn Peter Pan that rises with its cheerful flight towards the Sun of NeverlandIt is one of the best Visual moments of entire Filmography of Steven Spielberg, in collaboration with the piece of music that accompanies it. Peter Pan is back!. The analogy between Peter and hook becomes the traditional antithesis, which hook may not use their knowledge of himself to disrupt the world of Peter and his family. In a way, hook always has represented a dark reflection of the same Peter Pan, noting the duality in the personality of Barrie, as they have claimed many analysts of the literary work. But Peter - and here we have an apparent internal inconsistency problem and in the speech - you have forgotten that his next adventure is to save them and their children. When Bell asks a kiss, Peter returns to resort to the Cup as a sign of innocence. But Bell calls a kiss of truth, and that Kiss returns to awaken the memories of Moyra and his paternity. Ran your adventures, Peter. It does not matter. However, to make clear that Hook is a film failed, and one of the most imperfect and frustrating of Spielberg, who attempted and intended to offer us a crepuscular Peter Pan to be the definitive Peter Pan for the history of cinema. The idea was good, a masterpiece potential, discover the child who did not want to grow from a decadent optics, and its revival after the understanding of the need to mature and be responsible. With this libérrima vision with respect to the original, Spielberg could speak of himself as updating the themes and designs that give way to the country of Neverland, being this one of his films more personal in which human being, so much that he wanted to offer, slipped her hands. And that it was not only intended to be intimate insight and a somewhat sinister re-reading the classic, but also a total spectacle. All this does not exclude the fact that - seventeen years after its premiere - remains a misunderstood and film, in part, underestimated, ignored by much of the public, tasted with nostalgia by others who saw in it the best possible Peter Pan update. In any case, Hook has two facets: family film entertainment and dense in concepts work. As film entertainment, although irregular, works pretty well. When it fails the Mise en scène, the soundtrack by John Williams guarantees the fun with a varied musical record which, at times, reach a few levels of adequacy to the image, the rhythms and bombastic sense that Spielberg intends to give to its history, exceeding everything imaginable. Apart from the examples mentioned in preceding paragraphs, is indispensable cited the sequence in which Smee (Bob Hoskins), followed by Peter Banning (Robin Williams) and an Entourage of pirates (Yes, Yes, the hook is here), carries the hook from the pirate village, passing through the gateway that ascends up to the ship and the room in which Captain Hook (Dustin Hoffman) expects to announce the news of the abduction of children. The score of Williams is a huge boost to the already on their enormous sense of the show showing Spielberg, taking maximum advantage of the bombast of the decor, especially in the case of a scene of pure transit. As work of introspection and personal analysis of the author, often critics noted internal inconsistencies, which, in the light of what I have already said, are quite relative, and that kind of trials they are rather fruit of errors in reading and interpretation of the text. Hook, indeed, is a film that has many objectives, and often the narration loses the fluidity, it stretches and will espesando into a megalomaniac story in which, especially in its final stretch, predominates the kitsch of the worst Spielberg. But the backbone that gives shape and meaning to history, under an eye attentive, comprehensive and freed from the prejudices caused by the desire to see a story true to the original work of J. Barrie, presents one more than acceptable development, as we have already explained in detail. And it should not be forgotten that Hook, as indicated by the title, is more a film about Captain hook that on Peter Pan. We insist: Peter Banning and hook are the same, and this analogy dominates most of the footage. Interestingly, the film loses much interest from the moment in which it appears Peter Pan, that thereafter he hoped a circus rather bland and insubstantial. Let us turn now to mention their most obvious defects; There are clear - and high-profile - errors of casting, as the election of Julia Roberts to play Bell. It is not only regrettable action actress, they the Bell character is virtually out of the story and this is an error in which the writers have part of the responsibility. And speaking of the script, in a work who walks among the lyrical fantasy and humor, dialogues and description of situations do not always keep the proper balance of tones, being very clever in some parts, and others are absolutely childish. But the more serious problem of Hook - and this would have been unthinkable, trying to Spielberg - is its irregularity in the Mise en scène. In certain passages, we run into a staging cold and empty, a default very well disguised - as we have already said - with energy, the bombast and the magic of the music of John Williams. In the first segment of the film, which takes place in London and the home of Wendy, impeccable Spielberg narrative fits into a dark atmosphere that implies the imminent arrival of hook. The mess starts when we arrived at Neverland and we find ourselves with a photograph of Dean Cundey. Photography is a crucial element for achieving the narrative quality, and is not otherwise used properly according to a meaning or a narrative intention lighting. It is important that a natural lighting filmmaker will create an abstraction depending on what you want to express. Unfortunately, in the scenes filmed in the pirate village and on the deck of the ship from hook, apparently the photographic work is limited to illuminate the scene with light, with which we have a world of impersonal Neverland, a spectacular and excessive decor without the abstraction characteristic to the worlds of fantasy and magic. This error damages especially in the final leg of the story, in the overwhelming battle between the pirates and the lost boys, and the subsequent duel between Peter and hook sword, but lacks meaning and dramatic force because of a colourful and absolutely banal image processing. Synthesizing, the irregularity predominates in this film at all levels, while being an interesting magical tale about innocence lost and recovered, a product of entertainment that drinks from the musical and the universe disneyano, a modernized vision of the original work that inspires, capable of significant things to say both to the mind of a child as an adult. Ideal in any case for Preparatoria - possibly with the heat of a fire - on dates Christmas, so conducive to return to our origins, to visit parents and grandparents, and remind the child that we were.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/943

Silvia Giner

Casino Royale

muchocine

Casino Royale takes place with good pace, maintains an interesting pulse with the viewer during the poker game. A very successful script to show us as James Bond became.

Director Martin Campbell, which we already entertained (and long) with "The mask of Zorro" and "The legend of Zorro" among others, surprises us now with a new sequel to the most famous secret agent James Bond. Previously he already led quite less fortunate "GoldenEye" than the current "Casino Royale".Sincerely I went to the cinema to see this movie practically forced, that in addition to not like me at all none of the previous 007 (specifically GoldenEye seemed colossal boring), but I have to admit that I found a pleasant surprise.Martin Campbell has left the skin in this film (imagine after the shit from the previous sequel), told us the story of a young Bond which premieres as a double agent zero, with its mistakes his sweat in the chest (arf arf), anyway, more humane and what I always say "believable". and who is the new macizorro? AI nenas is Daniel "pout" Craig (aaaaaa I have weakness for the blondes), an actor most secondary cases, with 47 movies under his belt, still had the opportunity to show its splendour as in this film. If my daughters is making bread and wet? Since then and with great distinction the best James Bond who has known this legend (although that carries the movie becoming pout).And who is the companion of this Stallion? (do anda? that you are willing to start the despelle) as Eva Green! Recovered from baldness who flogged his tree in "The Kingdom of heaven" becomes a pavisosa bond girl. Eva is a great actress, we like, we respect, we fell in love with in "Dreamers" has a peculiar beauty (I will skip the part where I say that we can play quietly on his forehead to pelota), but? honestly it is not the type of actress I had chosen as a bond girl, not paste anything, we are going and much less since that has thinned so much that he has that look of "I'm doing a diet that you shit and I want bread bread bread" i.e. the eyes desencajados by hunger, much better in "Dreamers", Eva, we like with curves? This role was for Evangeline Lily (lost) or Vahina Giocante (Lia says), this had been an espectacularísima-bond girl, above all for playing Vesper? anyway maybe is that Martin wanted to give a touch of sosez to this character.Casino Royale takes place with good pace, maintains an interesting pulse with the viewer during the poker game. A very successful script to show us as James Bond became. Finally note the impeccable Judy Dench, an actress who should honor urgently and that repeated along with Daniel in the continuation of "Casino Royale" whose premiere is scheduled for 2008 and which will bear the name of "Bond 22", yet by confirms bond girl and rest of cast.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/779

Cándida

Volver

muchocine

Pere Lope Prus is the protagonist. It is very beautiful, it is very nice.

From muchocine.net we welcome to the largest, the criticism among the criticisms, the unsurpassed Candida. This is your special tribute to Pedro Almodovar, manchego more international filmmaker. Enjoy with the criticism because it has no waste.Vorvé. Pere Lope Prus is the protagonist. It is very beautiful, it is very nice. It turns out that it is a girl cleaning the cemetery goes home and meets a lot of cans to the husband and tells him give me a botellí and he says but good if you've tomao forty you have to go to work and it says "Nooo", because I am tired of working so this is going to end.Then she picks up and down to see his aunt who is blind lost, tia you do not you can be alone because you're going to die here and it says clear with your husband cannot and belly down with a puddle of blood is the husband. Pere Lope Prus protagonist eh, vorvé. Listen to the criticism of return of Candida gomaespuma.com (notice: Ponte helmets if you're currando, that you're playing the extra pay.)

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4323

Renegado

Hitman

muchocine

Sporadic action scenes, a character that conveys little and too irregular pace at times, make this a film purporting to most of what ends up offering.

With honorable exceptions as they could be, in my modestísima opinion, the saga of "Resident Evil" and "Tomb Rider" (and this only because it is Angelina and that justifies anything), until today attempts to film movies based on famous video games have not been very successful to say.Although probably had the best of intentions when it comes to production, the final results achieved never managed to transport the necessary to conquer fans mystique of the original games to the big screen, or managed to round out a product that capture the interest of the public in general as to make these tapes a genuine success.Thus, years ago were attempts with classic games like "Mortal Kombat" or "Street Figther" failed miserably leading to films that actually better not to remember. Much more recently in the time, landed in theaters two productions based on the popular "Doom" and "Silent Hill" games which, although quite improved the level, have gone through billboards without penalty or glory.In the case of this film, "Hitman", I think that unfortunately qualify to swell the list of the latter.The story focuses on the activities of a relentless, almost infallible, killer created through genetic manipulation of DNA from criminals and murderers more dangerous in the world (as, not is Charles Manson, Al Capone, Casaca (jojojo that spark), Blas Giunta, Professor Neurus, José Luis Chilavert, and many others), and coached by an independent international secret organization known as "The Organization" (is that the silver had been spent training assassins and were not left) (anything to hire a creative that invent them a cornered name), which does not respond to any Government, or movement, or political party, and which offers its services (consisting of killing people, walk dogs and prosecute unfaithful wives) to the highest bidder, whoever.The Association of that salad of genes of evil with this unscrupulous company comes from this man become an almost perfect machine kill, strictly professional, elegant, meticulous, cold and lethal. A man without feelings, without remorse, without hair, and extremely attached and obsessive with his work (i.e. killing people).A man without a name, known only as Agent 47 (although there in the company colleagues called him Cacho).His life was normally as any relentless killer: a murder here, a trip, another murder there, another journey, a degollado, a poisoned beyond. Nothing out of the ordinary.However, (and luckily because but the film would have been even more boring), a day is assigned a seemingly very routine like any other mission, consisting of flying the sabiola to a so-and-so and quite important.The peeled, goes, hit the shot, save everything and turns away making pasito murga.When returns to his hotel (because always stops at hotels to be more cool) report you that in carrying out its mission something that seems to have failed, with the aggravating circumstance that, in addition, there was a risk to be identified by an occasional witness (which coincidentally is more good to miss a Monday to school). In other words, the message was "Che gilastrún, note that it seems that flower crap you sent to you." Now not going to collect a sope. "To mourn the Church".The 47 (Cacho) says "Cannot." "If I do not you erro never to anything" and there just to check, with your eyes closed spits a seed of an orange which was eating, and her take on an ashtray was on the other side of the room.At that time, and thanks to its extraordinary deductive powers developed during the comprehensive years of hard mental training to which it was subjected, but more than anything because passed you a piece of paper under the door that said "Sos ballot forros head." "Signed: the Organization", realizes that that last assignment had been a trap mounted in order to eliminate it.Hence the peeled gets like crazy, not only because they had been told "head of forros" knowing that you don't like, but because also realizes that killing him was a form of fire him without paying him compensation nor the unused vacation and that, after many years of service, is intolerable.From then on, and then choose to disaffiliate from the SACG (Union of assassins created genetically) do not feel represented, will undertake the Mission of discovering who and why he wants to do on their own ballot, why you do not want to recognize the antiquity, why is peeled and why demons has no name if not it cost them a hell put him one.Of course to achieve this must evade police forces who seek him for the little that that killed a lot of types, in addition to having to deal with those who until recently were their "brothers", or assassins so effective, cold, lethal, peeled and expressionless as he.The film itself, ends up being difficult to define.Obviously it is action, but he succeeds only at times. In other passages becomes slow, and others is that it seems that you are booting with everything and stays in the threat.There are many shots, fighting, blood, explosions and everything that one would expect to see a tape of this genus, but developed in a way that does not seem to reach to round out a film in accordance.Admittedly, they strove to include shots that seem really taken directly of the game, especially those in which sees the protagonist walking by corridors of hotels and other (and speaking of which, the type walks very rare.) Not is if trying to mimic the game or why, but it seems that he walk holding a carrot with the ass, so everything straight and medium shirring), but otherwise, no longer a tape of ordinary shots with little support.As for the cast, we find Timothy Olyphant in the leading role as Agent 47, in a work that never ends convince. His performance lacked almost completely of expressivity, depth and above all charisma, making the viewer will be quite difficult to excite with the protagonist. Accompany it with the beautiful Olga Kurylenko as Nika, Dougray Scott as Mike Whittier, Robert Knepper as Yuri Marklov, Urlich Thomsen as Belicof, Michael Offei as Jenkins and Henry Ian Cusik as Udre Belikof.La film was directed by Xavier Gens which should perhaps play a little more with the Playstation before get to adapt the game to the film format.Rating: 2 forsaken and a half (does not become bad, but good either.) A bit more than regular it would be good. (Sporadic action scenes, a character that conveys little and too irregular pace at times, make this a film purporting to most of what ends up offering).Recommendations: If you is a fan of the game and just want to see his character coming to life in a movie, go. Sure he likes.If you expect a dizzying and violent action film, go by the violence, but not ilusione with the Vertigo.If you are depressing because he believes little expressive, go; see the protagonist and will find consolation.If you are of those laburo, and one, and one to win the romantic favors of a lady and still most of the time fails; go, and retuérsace of indignation seeing such wasted every opportunity with a mine as I would say the Bambino "Esss a mannnnteca!". "!!"

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/898

Enrique Colmena

El camino de los ingleses

muchocine

How not are you going to forgive Antonio that makes a failed movie, even though it is so pleasantly failed? So, finally, to the best sweeps up at box office and all.

We must recognize value to Antonio Banderas: to make his second film as director not only comes to Spain, when commercial prospects would be much higher in United States, where it is settled three decades ago, but it also makes a version very lyrical, barely grossing novel of a poet, Antonio Soler, for more inri undertakes solo script, with what the load poetics (sometimes touching the kitsch) of the novel wanders its shadow throughout the film. And it is that, although it seems a truism, not always a good book can be a good movie; in fact the experience comes to say quite the opposite. In addition, languages are not equal, and what works in a book (the voice of the narrator in film, generally resulting from more shocking: here is an example) does not have why to do it in a film. It is clear that fascinated the Soler novel flags: the atmosphere of the Malaga of the tardofranquismo, in the mid-1970s, just the time in which he was approximately the same age of the characters in the novel and the film, and probably also lived and met the same places in which the action of the book and the film unfolds. It is also true that the tone that has given flags (and his screenwriter Soler) to this "camino de los ingleses", between the poetic and dreams, with allegorical reflections (that initial, so atypical scene in modern commercial cinema), bathed in ubiquitous Antonio Meliveo music, with chords more reminiscent of the jazz to flamenco (better as well: not always the cinema in Andalusia has to resort to the jondo)(, although some people so creates it), is pure poison for the box office, not accustomed the public to such licenses. Said which will have to say that "The road." neither succeeds with the tone: history tells us is curious, albeit not precisely not going more than originality. In addition, flags, which has counted on a budget (EUR 7 million) than what is the it style in Spain for a production as this (without known actors, nor complicated special effects, and scenes of masses), seems that it has been self-absorbed in the beauty of the images, and so the film is too precocious, as if the director had regodeado in a dream to Malagacertainly only exists in his Magin and the of those who knew her, more than thirty years ago. All of which should not overshadow the merits of the film, the story of a boy with one less kidney, in love with a girl who in turn is tempted by another man of more possible than her boyfriend; It is also the story of their friends, the son of the rich who is forced to leave the girl who wants to, and the son of the "strip-teuse" that makes sex on stage in London. It is also the story of aspiring announcer of radio, perhaps a reflection of own novelist and screenwriter, Antonio Soler, although eventually his radio "speechs" remember more programmes of the fool of the Hill of the 1970s. And in addition to all that, why not say it? Antonio is the girl in the eyes of the Spaniards, and not to mention the Andalusians. His triumph in Hollywood so enjoy as their own, as in the 1960s with the successes of Manolo Santana tennis or now Fernando Alonso in racing. So, how does not gonna you forgive make a failed movie, even though it is so pleasantly failed? So, finally, to the best sweeps up at box office and all.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2411

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Tu la letra, yo la música

muchocine

Put the language in a jar of jam and polite viciously glass.

Viva harmless film, Strawberry mermalada and Wham melodies: you the lyrics, I music is harmless, off film of all claim to survive or remove any social, political or even aesthetic awareness in the public. It is not that speech in his foundational libretto; It sobreabunda the tedium, one viscous and jingle Christmas machine-gunned a Superficie.Como great invisible speakers all romantic comedy, lacks philosophical pretensions (up Matrix had halo of mystical sandwiched in a tatami infógrafico kung-fu) and does not break any of the many conventions of the genre: triumphs of love while the couple flirts with uncertainty andfor the greater glory of the sweet ferment of all romance, they bypass difficulties that are compensated by a glamorous and apparently ending a long dozen of times and although we have many WINS lend fuel and turn her, the film touches our sensitive heart.Who felt a tremor effervescent in the heart to hearing a pop melody, who has heard in his memory the notes of his song choice at the head in a bus queue at the very moment that you are going to meet in the Delicatessen, this is your film. There will be no disappointment. Hugh Grant is a correct - not the Cary Grant who tried to sell - comedian, an actor cómodoamente installed in a series of dramatic patterns that has internalized with appalling trade. Drew Barrymore is giving away the inconveniences of this melifluo film to then put the hand and his name not to be missed in the tangible warp of the divas that are on track to be. In any case, nothing remarkable in this graciosillo toy, nothing relevant: not intended. The tape passes its legitimate Olympus of frivolity paid to a sentimental Cookbook as predictable as inane and inconsequential. It is not possible to be too rogue to write a few lines which, although they will never/never be laudatory, nor enter fiercely in the flesh, digging in the pure viscus

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2851

Naty Buqué

¿Qué he hecho yo para merecer esto?

muchocine

Excellent film by Pedro Almodóvar, with characters in-cre-í-bles, live, wonderful performances, a setting that falls from kistch and a series of adventures suitable for burst of laughter.

Excellent film by Pedro Almodóvar, with characters in-cre-í-bles, live, wonderful performances, a setting that falls from kistch and a series of adventures suitable for burst of laughter.But also the movie, starring a Carmen Maura 10, explores, as always, or almost always, certain traits of the female Constitution which, if in other films it is very psychoanalyst and macho somewhere, as defines almost categorically what being a woman, and the woman is almost a clown (always with good intentions, of course, but that is no excuse)in this film the inquiry is rather sociological order and there is a search of what being a woman but did it (ergo the patriarchal order, ergo the man) society.The answer, in a final falling of perfect. Her husband he killed him - albeit accidentally-, to his younger son sold it to a child molester dentist to buy an iron hair, the pet lizard was killed by a police officer and his eldest son just go with her grandmother (her mother) to the hometown of the latter. The House is single. Finally, she is not wife, or mother or homemaker. It will throw off the balcony.But then comes his younger son (who realizes that is very young to sit head with the dentist.) Note: the nene is as 11 years old) and she is saved. Maura already falls by the balcony because you who hold. He returned to being a mother.Women is defined, in what I have done?, by negativity. Being a woman is to be mother, daughter-in-law (not even daughter, that is something too own), housewife, Maid in outside houses, wife (if we look at the other characters add: or bitch or bad parent).Almodóvar exposes the impossibility of women constitute as such: is a pure external determination.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2285

Rafa Delgado

300

muchocine

The sequences epicismo and heroism, nor entertaining battles (in slow motion?) has the film, sweet and the sour sensation of having witnessed an absolute smallness, compared to what could have been really have been able to remedy.

First of all, I would like to say that I am of those they loved Sin City (although her I have not seen since its release in theaters, waiting to come out an Edition on DVD at the height of the circumstances), but not of those who have read the graphic novels by Frank Miller in which the aforementioned are based, and the film before this text: 300, directed by Zack Snyder (director of the very enjoyable dawn of the dead), so do not know if it is a faithful and adaptation to the height of the work of the Lord.I wanted to see this film, thanks to the magnificent trailers and clips from the movie Warner us has been offering as bait for which more expected to see her, all the time we have been waiting for this release. But the fact is that created high expectations for a film of considerable relevance artistic and economically speaking, such as 300, might be a blunder. And is that I could not help me feel a tad disappointed by the end of the projection. 300 is an audiovisual show unique and true to the style of Frank Miller, as already occurred in Sin City. A delight to the eye (there are levels that are true works of art, and does not detract any merit which are a copy of the drawings of Miller) and ear (the soundtrack is fantastic, an explosive mixture of genres without precedent in the peplum). There are battles of spear and sword to give and take: A real feast violently explicit and entertaining, which seems to be no place for historical accuracy. In addition, the cast is one hundred percent (Gerald Butler, King Leonidas, huge for my taste).But unfortunately in this case is not gold that glitters (although it might have been perfectly).From my point of view, the best way to define 300 is compared to a "gift-matriuska": make you delivery of a huge box with very colorful wrap, touching the exquisiteness. You open as if wishing you was life in this, to see what is inside, but you're with another smaller box. So once, and another, and another, until you find a small box which is inside the gift, that to see it, you like, but what you also think nothing out of this world for both envoltorio.300 so. It is technically perfect, but something goes wrong. History not found me nothing of another Thursday. At first it interest, but that interest will deflate as it is spending time. In my opinion part of blame for this is her argument, which does not give almost two horazas duration (there are several "scenes of stretching" quite boring for the crux of the film.), and the complaint and absolutely excessive use of slow motion, which just overloading, and gets only loathe and put more sticks to the wheel of the already irregular rhythm of the film.But in what may be, her I enjoyed, but sequences of epicismo and heroism, nor the battles (in camera slow.) which owns the film, have been able to remedy a bittersweet feeling of having witnessed an absolute smallness compared to what could have been really.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3851

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Mr Brooks

muchocine

Failed because it aspires to much, but convincing, Mr. Brooks gives an at least worthy spectacle, which provides the unbiased viewer a return of outstanding nut to the clichés about the psycho-killer so burned by Hollywood...

The role of the psychokiller, of the serial killer taken from a manual of Criminology or America's deep and disturbed, has delivered an estimable Philo of commercial and even artistic possibilities to those who manage the crematístico matter in the all-powerful Hollywood. It was as if the murderer in question heeling his addiction to kill trails planned and exploited (the inexhaustible series of Halloween, Friday the 13th, nightmare on Elm Street and similar) or looked at the intellectual side of the bloody act of depriving the lives of others so that they arose depraved towering coefficients, illustrated in baroque painting and a conversation at the height of any circumstance the estimable Hannibal Lecter-style, absolute reference in the genre and on their own merits, inmarcesible deity of the popular terrifying imagery. The novelty of the contribution of the Harris/Demme/Hopkins támden is the appearance of the psychopath, his complete lack of physical signs that reveal the degree of disturbance that suffers from. Acts, on the other hand, betray it for what it is: a diabolical type until the naúsea. They were also brothers of guts and horror, now remember, Henry (a wonderful Michael Rooker) or himself John Doe (Kevin Spacey) in the fantastic Seven.Algunos were anointed by the breath of God and others not needed any divine breath and enough a childhood of abuse or a father ingeniously bastard for desastrar the life of the future star of evil, frivolous and coincidentally all said. Not to mention, but we will, to provoke the reader complicit smile and versed in national disasters, the presence of the black Tuno psychockiller, an infamous product of the desire that we copy outside it without commitment, style or (perhaps) knowledge. To tumultuous assassins have Pascual Duarte or Jarrapellejos, present in varying degrees in some hypothetical list of thugs in the history of cinema. Some had an alter-ego jodiente and barely presentable in society that incited them to perpetrate acts which the good soul, the civilized, either no known either it repudiated from the deeper his altered essence. In any case, I repeat not for this thread. I am not nor an expert on the subject and this is precisely not the gender that has most excited my cinephiles.Something like what happens to Mr. Brooks who plays (very decently) Kevin Costner in this failed, in part, great film. Everything is quite apparently not astonished, said Vicente Aleixandre in a poem. Costner amazed because it abandons the friendly side, buenetón, methodical parent family or respectable agent in order to deliver his craft (and it has more than) to shape a dark man necessarily tormented party by the inevitable presence of a reverse scary (William Hurt) that it precipitates you evil and we could almost say that it offers the predictable moral alibi to save his conscience and paid you to the lecherous and orgiastic sack of the outside lives. Evil in Mr. Brooks is a not very hectic cocktail suggestions and sufficiently explicit situations as the avid adrenaline Viewer out enraged and the movie buff of more restful taste and wish to see an elegant entertainment smile and understand that, without being a masterpiece, without even being a good film, round, compactrecommended without fissures, they have given for the euros of rigor is a classic film than it seems, away from the apocalyptic winds that blow and, above all, an accomplice in a way already almost forgotten to film, which is the amaze and make pleasant surprise without resorting to brutal twists of the plot or to see indications that everything has been writtenfilmed and canned to trick us. what fails then? Barely worked the script, hooked in an absolute way and it loses excessive moral disquisition and inconvenient sub-plots that never provide sensitive material to the primary. It is clouded by an excess of ambition. It malea its rich premise with a go reprise that had been able to be ignored so that the tape lasted one hour earlier. As this is not possible, they have thrown by the easiest way. Have two films in one or mount two episodes (one excellent and one very bad) in a same narrative gimmick. The devil Mr. Brooks has as malignant escort for much and dries up too soon, although the best moments (philosophies and separate lounge misticismos) give when healthy laugh about the perversion of their misdeeds and argue as two perfect partners in crime on the tricks to deploy so that the police is not silly, not caught them by too early. Mr. Brooks, the schizoid character, then surrenders to the problematic mess of guilt and there ceases to be a serial killer as some would like to mutate into a priest eaten by doubt about whether God exists or is the invention of a holding company headquartered in the Vatican. In the end.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3297

Iñaki Bilbao

Stardust

muchocine

Nice film of fantastic adventures, that will not go to the history of the cinema precisely.

Pretty pretty fantastic adventure film, full of action and fantasy, appropriate for all ages, although not precisely for the smallest of the House because you have violence and assassinations, although almost always shown with a black humor, can't be violent and unpleasant (again, for the little ones).It is well told, with clarity and without stun to the respectable with abstruse scenes. Here the argument is fácilcemente and the characters quite well defined, are sharp from the start.The only thing negative can be its long, slightly more than two hours to tell a story that would have sufficed with just over an hour and a half. But there are scenes of filling half of the film, which are irregular in their interest and that bedevil the good rhythm that, in general, has the tape. An imaginative tape, with action, humor and love, full of romanticism, and also, as I said earlier, of violence.All this under the prism of fantasy, which is the Foundation which supports an argument where the good fight against evil, an evil which manifests itself in human greed, lust for power and the search for eternal youth.Arguably, it is positive because the human virtues are imposed, in unequal battle, defects, criminal acts of petty things.The best thing is its first half-hour, where they feel the bases of history, and the character played by Robert de Niro, this time something more active than in other tapes where the great actor often simply comply (and charge), without further. Here she plays an atypical character, with substance, which is in line with the new times where deeper human values are imposed on the choice which one to choose, by more politically and socially incorrect seem. Something exemplary in the background, although unfortunately there are samples of parody and some coarse salt in the representation of that character, something that makes laughter, but that would have perhaps required something more serious.But, in General, it's a very entertaining movie, where imagination overflows to each frame and contains good moments and characters, such as the goat turned into humans. Gets very well the time, although I am afraid that it leaves not much footprint in memory after a while.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1302

Elena Suárez

Klimt

muchocine

Too many Visual pretensions to disguise a little work of documentation and, gentlemen, in this case gender submitted to us it is a biography.

I remember the criticism that, a few months ago he received the film "Goya's ghosts"; most were not very good and almost all were based on a false concept according to which the work intended to be a biography of the excellent painter and clear, from this point of view was poor, and even incorrect. At the time, I said that the film was not, under any circumstances, a biography, but that, based on the philosophy and life of the painter, Milos Forman, was able to introduce a historical character in an imaginary plot (something that is not as simple as it seems). Having said that, you ask everyone, and tale of what is it now? So very simple, these same critics that cursed both the direction of the Lord form, talked about wonders at the exit of the pass press "Klimt", a biography rather chaotic on one of the most outstanding painters of the 19th century.Well, my first recommendation is that if you don't know the work and life of the painter, you have two options: either documented on the life of Klimt or not you go see the movie. Do notice you, if he comes to see her without knowing data about the artist, come with the same notions, well, not exaggerate? You will know something more: painted nude ladies, had a great friend with right to rubbing, his art didn't like some of his contemporaries and syphilis badly damaged his nervous system. In addition to this content, you will see a stunning work of art. Both the picture and the colors are extremely cared to bring us into the symbolism of Gustav Klimt, but otherwise, the film has more mistakes than successes: true is that this painter was known for his love for the female body and that there are a lot of oil paintings and drawings on the physiognomy of the woman with all luxury of details, but is not less false that not only selected for this thin young but, also, he showed us the ajado body of elderly or the redondeces of pregnant women.It is true that he had a great friendship (perhaps more) with Emile Louise Flogë and, for this reason, it is said that when the painter died of an apoplexy attack asked to bring her to his side, data that the director not him interested, for him Klimt died saying "flowers".Klimt had a great fondness for his mother, and after his death, his palette became more sober and dark, because it is not important for Raoul Ruiz, moreover, we conclude the film simply mother and sister shared illness and hallucinations.So we could follow a few points but I do not intend to bore you too much, so, to sum up, too many Visual claims to disguise a little work of documentation and, gentlemen, in this case gender submitted to us it is a biography.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/705

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Maleficio

muchocine

We are already tired of American charms, which seems out of Tennessee, Nebraska, Nevada or Wichita Falls there Poltergeist or possessed. It is what happens to them for having a very small story.

As one is innocent and is believed to foot juntillas everything what you have, I am assuming that this film is based on real events. Otherwise, deleted the innocence, annulled the sentimental goodness that everyone tells the truth, imagines what they have done is copy and paste scenes of the exorcists who there are loose and some other bad tape series B with curses and girls are shaking up in the bed, dams of some invisible form of the topical Mal.El haunted house dresses here of nineteenth-century haunted housea Gothic point. Nor have been careful in excess in adapt the era (19th century) with the history tells us. Predictable too, gives a nervous camera sweeps the screen and puts the nerves the patient spectator that at no time has been really pushed to show a minimum interest. At times I thought a premieres tv with a loose budget and two actors of posh (Sissy Spacek and Donald Sutherland), but none gives the story dramatic support because the writers have most enjoyed in Concatenate impact scenes which, in many cases, we are too familiar, instead of spinning the episode of spirits with amenity going and coming as I am pleased by the 19th century stairs.It has not been the such Solomon delete movie fan collective memory that grain which was dragons and dungeons, although the épila lose the brains by going to the cinema to its ration of petition fantasy. The badly burned resource of the startle thick: welcomes the idea of the horror film works based on noise and crackles of staircase, girls that appear and disappear in a swing or shots in black and white so we advise (is that we are idiots) who is the ghost or spirit or the sobresaltador of turn which looks and we, silly, really, look for their terrifying eyes. Everything already on the Asian.Tobe Hopper is more truculenta, but knows the subject better. Up a commanded as Sidney j. Furie made a significant entity, which is to say more or less the same, but without setting. Is that we are already fed up with American charms, which seems out of Tennessee, Nebraska, Nevada or Wichita Falls there Poltergeist or possessed. It is what happens to them for having a very small story: who must pull anecdotes and become national episode that outside its borders is absolute bullshit.We hope, anxious, Clint Eastwood and its flags of our fathers. This story is at least stronger: affects most everyone. I already do not want more fantasmadas.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4108

Heitor Pan

8 mujeres

muchocine

See the Deneuve move the arms in an attempt to sensuality to the rhythm of a song plumbate is a rarity as worthy of witness as to forget.

Her had postponed an infinite number of times by laziness or carelessness, but at the end, the recommendation of a friend has given to an end with a verdict expected: Although we agree in a comprehensive film, something proven taste in our trips to the cinema, will continue to have our particular irreconcilable dark sides. This film was an event in France, because it brought together for the first time to a number of the great ladies of French cinema in a strange film, mixture of the heir to the novels of Agatha Christie film and musical melodrama. Great performers of several generations as Catherine Deneuve, Isabelle Huppert, Fanny Ardant, Emmanuelle Beart and Virginie Ledoyen and Ludivine Sagnier composed a filmed play, in which 8 women try to discover the murderer of the only man of the House.In a mansion isolated by snow, eight women discover the corpse of the husband of one of them. So this woman, as his mother, his sister, his daughters, his sister-in-law or the maids of the family can hide some reason for having killed a man in cold blood. Between surprises and musical numbers, women will seek to clarify the mystery by discovering the miseries and secrets of a very unusual family.Each one of the actresses gives life to a female character, all full of eccentricities, dark secrets and hidden desires in a plot that begins a classic, recalling such films as "negritos 10", but as it progresses begins to be possessed by the spirit of a screenwriter of telenovelas. The story is complicated by setting impossible relationships among women or giving rise to unexpected turns of script that I missed the characters to some Luis Alfredo or to hear the actors speaking with the classic Venezuelan accent.If that wasn't enough to impress the public, to the actresses of the draught of the of the film, typical of a dense and dramatic film, see navigate in a script as psychoactive, every time it occurs before the bewildered eyes of the spectator a musical number that brings little to the plot, without any musical interest and choreographies arriving at times cause the embarrassment. See the Deneuve move the arms in an attempt to sensuality to the rhythm of a song plumbate is a rarity as worthy of witness as to forget.It is possible that there who take everything as a parody to this kind of movies and enjoy with the showcasing of some actresses are able to fill the screen with the dialogues in other mouths would lead to flight, but I was unable to see the screen with that perspective. Just as I enjoyed with the musical numbers on "The other side of the bed" or with the hilarious detective intrigues of the classic "A corpse to the desserts", I bored in a sovereign manner with the comings and goings of characters without spark, incapable of drawing a smile or involve me in a story too marciana for my taste.I don't know how the script on paper, would be it is impossible to deduce a priori the success of a film, but it is quite complicated to me thinking that all these actresses have been in a similar story a good movie, unless they access under duress or under the weight of a lot of green billetitos.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1578

Taliesin

El buen alemán

muchocine

With the good German, Soderbergh plays to shoot as fifty years ago and, although interesting, is closer to the experiment to the masterpiece.

Just need to compare the good German with Casablanca posters for ententer the Declaration of intent by Steven Soderbergh could not be clearer. The good German is film noir, black white, and with many of the Archetypes of the genre. Again the second world war and the reunion of two lovers. Again a plot full of conspirators and Crusader interests. Again the murders and sex with the look. But, nevertheless, this is not Casablanca. The film takes us to the Berlin defeated in 1945, the Potsdam Conference to be held. Captain Jacob Geismer (Clooney) comes as a journalist, and the violent death of an American soldier will take you to get into more trouble than thought. Soon you will find with Lena Brandt (Cate Blanchett), who was her lover in Berlin a few years ago. Not desvelaré much more of the plot, but if you say that you have other meeting points with the classic starring Bogart, including the final scene at the airport. And this can be both an advantage and a disadvantage. The advantage is the classic aftertaste that keeps the tape and reinforced by a great work of photography and a meticulous post-production. The disadvantage is that the attempt of tribute lastra both characters and script, so that the viewer has just realizing the trap and can discover where did address both.In the section of the interpretation, in addition to the histrionic character of Tobey Maguire (aka Spider-man), is remarkable of the protagonists. Clooney quite well, as always, but not just give the character the character you need and Blanchett with a beauty cold closer to Marlene Dietrich to Bergman. By the way the scenes of no-sexo star perhaps be the best of the film.Ultimately, the good German is an entertaining film, although it is ballast at times by the rigour that Soderbergh has self-imposed to be faithful to the film you want to honor. To highlight the protagonist couple and the care that has been the setting, both artistic and technical levels. For this reason, although it is not one of the best works of the director, today it is the best in billboard. Interesting.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/759

Jeremy Fox

Un buen año

muchocine

If by the script would be a real horror film. As Scott is the director of worship, many are left to deceive and see quality where there.

I can't imagine how was conceived "A good year" (A Good Year). Ridley Scott has just come out of a box office failure, "The Kingdom of heaven", and is about to embark on an ambitious project ("American Gangster") so the best thing is to make a simple one, cheap, fast shooting and film a genre that enjoyment of popular fervour.Finally wheel a dramatic comedy of (allegedly) romantic Court, with an attractive and charismatic protagonist such as Russell Crowe, a few women of impressive body (se ve te the Duster, Ridley), beautiful landscapes, one bike cool so the prota moves slightly (do homage to some film of his brother?), a pinch of philosophy (cheap) and a lot of dialogues (ridiculous in good measure).If by the script would be a real horror film because, being a more typical history, on top of that it is full of topics about life, love, money and other. Nothing differentiates the screenplay for this film from the of many others of similar theme aimed at adolescents.But of course, Ridley Scott is headed by and this has two implications. The first is that the film is directed with correction and has an entretenidillo pace, although the action to move forward a little to tronpicones topic in topic, which makes that the two-hour film is not excessively long (although she is to notice).The second is that, as Scott is the director of worship, many are left to deceive and see quality where there. Not dealt with by the director of masterpieces such as "Alien" or "Blade Runner" this film would have received brutal criticism sticks. Reasons would not lack.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3343

José A. Peig

El sueño de Cassandra

muchocine

Tragedy marks the House, somewhat dodgier, but it has the potential to leave a bitter sediment in the sensitive spectator, complying with the essential objective of a modest product.

On Match Point, Woody Allen pondered the ambition that weakens the nobility of the human being in a universe ruled by chance. Cassandra's dream is another twist on the same object back and using very similar dramatic elements, offers us a bitter dissertation on the (so-called) American dream, without forgetting the usual comic pulse. Based on a theme, as recurring in the recent Filmography of Allen, the representation draws a pathetic smile through which the Viewer provides the life of characters desperate pessimism of the creator-driven.History of two losers who yearn to have the comfort and material goods through minimal effort. When they ask for help his wealthy uncle Howard, Providence imposes an unexpected price, an effort which in this case becomes the moral dilemma that holds all the discourse. As always, the characters are defined with millimeter accuracy and the development of chemical and conflicting attitudes has a clear plot reason, with which we have a film with a fairly solid development (contrary to what has been said since the first press passes). And it is that simplicity is a virtue here. Film apparently connotative and doomed to topics, but Allen doesn't forget the story you want to tell and gets to the end of his narration of thesis without getting his traps to produce an irreparable bias. The story works in its formal aspects, but is noticeable in excess the hand of the writer; the words of Ian and Terry are the same conscience of Allen, repeating the same dilemma already mentioned in earlier works, and thus often cease to be themselves to become the "thesis" of the film, with what the story loses in depth to rave in the megalomaniac speech, referred to in a certain superficiality very well disguised by unquestioned narrative agility in what to the scheme and the general progression. Film, in short, bright when you look at her on the basis of its scheme external until you reach a final situation resolved consistently, but failed according to the richness of nuances that tries to offer from the tragedy that beats in the background.In the speech, some issues include: Ian almost nihilist unconscious, and defends the stark reality of nature. The life feeds on death, and here the character exposes a wrong approach, since that own the natural world variables applied to the same culture of the American dream, obviating the necessary distinction between these two strata of life human. Terry is the obvious cliché of social consciousness. Each lost in their egoism, the other in the confusion of a weak soul together staged failure and frustrated dreams. The last shot, we see the boat "Cassandra's dream" rocking between the waves, the last witness to the end of an illusion. Thus, concludes with a clear reference to the first images of the film, when the two brothers go to port to buy at the best price.Finally, tragedy marks the House, somewhat dodgier, but it has the potential to leave a bitter sediment in the sensitive spectator, complying with the essential objective of a modest product.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1519

Kiko de España

Bosque de sombras

muchocine

If ever someone speaks badly of my directorial debut will mean several things, among them has been released, which is cause for celebration in this our country.

If ever someone speaks badly of my directorial debut will mean several things, among them has been released, which is cause for celebration in this our country.Forest of shadows, the much anticipated directorial debut of Koldo Serra (very highly recommend mother's love, I like more than the winning Witch's train) is halfway between the tribute and personal debut.A story that does not exist, characters that do not know and a resolution without claw and cold do not help to improve the work.Positive aspects for example, Oldman and Considine are well (which not very) Homar has a role with many secrets and intricacies that unfortunately we will not ever know.I don't know, expected me something more of claw and a bit more of chicha, notably paragraph SPOILER and trigger of "la movida".Anyway, despite its flaws, I am sure that Serra will make something very big in the near future.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/495

Bloody Will

La increíble historia de Caperucita Roja

muchocine

Do it is equally funny that?Shrek? or perhaps even higher. I do not remember that the Green OGRE and company make me laugh both as whole group of characters who in this film share dialogs in a distributed manner.

That nobody be fooled with the name. This is the best adult animation film. Her will understand children and even is so it will be good, but not so children will attend a series of dialog boxes that are as hilarious as intelligent. Nothing of cheap jokes. This appearance of CGI animation of all one hundred is supplied with an idea so original and well resolved that should shake to their competitors. do Acusarías to the tooth Pérez of extortion and housebreaking?. So here we have a C.S.I. mounted after the famous scene of "grandmother, that larger teeth have". Of course, in this story all are suspects: Red Riding Hood, Wolf, the grandmother and up the woodcutter passing by. Technically, in animation, the film is light years from any of Pixar, that is quite clear, but the argument and its screenplay leave behind most of products pixelated which have been released without ton or over these years.The attempted robbery of the grandmother recipes as main offence leads to the not so sweet hood to tell the story from a perspective that you had never imagined, not counting that the Wolf has a paid profession, grandmother far from being entered into a senior citizens residence, and the woodsman has more artistic aspirations that remain all his life throwing down trees. The plot contrivance to get sweets monopilo must be resuleta by a Commissioner of bulging eyes and some policemen of pig aspect (cogeis metaphor?). But not only the main protagonists lives this film. When he appears in action the goat and his banjo you are going from, without forgetting the squirrel oscuras and a rabbit something chinchón.With clear references to "Matrix", "Kill Bill" and the Chevy Chase Fletch detective series, the film relies on continuous flashbacks that Iran comprising as you will tell the same story from all those involved. Tell you more about the film would be muss you several surprises that must not be disclosed. I could tell you that it is just as fun as "Shrek" but it might be even higher. I do not remember that the Green OGRE and company make me laugh both as whole group of characters who in this film share dialogs in a distributed manner.In short, you can see with a child in another seat, or no child, because her you will enjoy in the same way. In a word: brilliant. This is the only film that I anxiously hope a sequel.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2706

Matías Cobo

Los 4 Fantásticos y Silver Surfer

muchocine

To the defined better what search the public a tape of this kind? relax awhile?, production has followed more in this proposal an as lawful as single purpose: entertain without great pretensions.

Given the proliferation of adaptations of cartoons heroes, no longer seems so simple that guaranteed success which seemed to bless each film inspiration comiquera when these were exceptions to the rule in the action genre. That is why I surprised this sequel to fantastic four, whose initial chapter I am far in his reception of a thunderous box office success and the welcome of the followers of the creation of the tandem Lee-Kirby.Es more, many of the most devout of this Quartet of Heroes found that introductory chapter of more mediocre. In my case, I've always been more a confessed follower of Spider-man, the tape left me rather cold. The combination of action with digital effects seemed poor and jokes at the expense of squabbles between the human torch and the thing of the weakest.Starting a Ribbon at very low altitude, the improvement was not a titanic mission. And certainly can be considered this second installment an improved version, in all aspects of its predecessor. But because of its adherence to the script set in the first film, the predictable result reduces this to a distracted pastime. I doubt very much that contente to staunch the paper version, but yes I believe that it will provide expected to those who attend the aware of the characteristics of a tape of this type film.Arguably, the film is the richest to focus on one of the most legendary comic in the fantastic four series: the arrival of Star Silver (Silver Surfer) to our planet with the mission to destroy it and the stubborn defence that Reed Richards and his will he face so powerful rival. Also reappears, although in a secondary place, the traditional enemy of the protagonists heroes: Doctor Muerte.El longer footage dedicated to action, at the expense of weak jokes or tramas seudodramáticas as the tension prior to the wedding of Richards (Ioan Gruffudd) and Sue Storm (Jessica Alba), make more bearable and enjoyable viewing of the film. Perhaps here lie the improved result of this the fantastic four and Silver Surfer. To the defined better what search the public a tape of this kind? relax awhile?, production has followed more in this proposal an as lawful as single purpose: entertain without great pretensions.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2531

Tito Chinchan

Transformers

muchocine

Film about robotos that is tranforman in vehicles and vice versa. Palomitera one hundred per cent, has the problem that you are going to be the mouth as esparto of the amount of exploited corn that gives you time to eat. Less roll and more call.

Your dear Special Envoy in Toledo has gone to cinemas in the periphery to inform you of the this movie of the car that transforms into robots. Not a month ago that it premiered, and a Friday at nine in the evening we were in the film five people, plus two of those put at four in the afternoon in the film and will be changing rooms until ending the session. Me I don't even imagine if I get in a room with Spanish film, they would be to plant these dry West movies.The film is a kid his father he subsidizes half a fardón car but made a shit. The boy what he wants, as it is logical in the late teens (of these American adolescents who do not already meet the 25), it is put it in marinade with the girl of the captain of the football team (which is as a cheese ball, everything is said). Total, resulting in what the boy is with triggered pheromones in the ass of the world, the most powerful army and Savior of free Nations is brutally attacked by something that dismantled it in two seconds. So while one fight that the human race is not extinguished, the others do the same. The eternal dilemma of the make love and not war, but with robots.Let's see, the movie is very long and becomes hiperlarga. Why? Let's analyse it in a nice list of things surely that clarify you everything: fighting robots-> Mooooooolan maaaaaazo.Robots that are tranforman-> Mooooolan.Robots that give the sheet-> Bueeno, come, for freedom and stuff.Comic robots-> funny touch necessary and essential.Explosions and special effects in two words,-> im presionantes.Soldiers-> in his role.Elders who make stupid-> to exterminate them and take his remains to the sharks.Teenage kids-> mortal coil.Scene girl that repairs car while guy lifts the car without cat-> wow!Footage-> excessive. We want more robots and less human.Final-> as should be, Fireworks.As you can see, everything to with robots has been plated. We can get you a couple of drawbacks. On the one hand, the stubbornness to the sheet with the goodness of the human, which is fine, but bored. And on the other hand those fights occur too much speed. That is, if the fighting were bad, because that move them fast. But it cannot be that as the Minister helicopter they slow down and then the struggles are at full blast. There was needed more detail for tired eyes.In short, film about robotos that is tranforman in vehicles and vice versa. Palomitera one hundred per cent, has the problem that you are going to be the mouth as esparto of the amount of exploited corn that gives you time to eat. Less roll and more call.I did not understand the puerile winks that do not contribute anything.Besitos.P.D: The robot Scorpion scene is great, in all senses.Pd2: The little robot I love.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/568

José Córdoba

Los Borgia

muchocine

Example of how a good direction can camouflage many defects, but not save a project when things as important as the acting and the script, play against.

Alatriste comes another Spanish historical production of "great" budget: Los Borgia. Big-budget is a saying of course, because little more than ten million euros for a historical film is very little. He had certain hopes for the film for its director, one of the best and least recognized there in Spain, Antonio Hernández, director of Lisbon and in the city without limits (also of the great Martian, but that explains why it was one of the creators of the program of TV innocent, innocent). Although it also had my misgivings because the film is a reduced version of a miniseries A3 premiering soon. The result is grey.The Borgias narrates the history of the saga of the Valencia family since the appointment as Pope Alexander VI until his death. A story full of palatial intrigue, violence and sex. It would today be a Venezuelan soap opera, we will. For more than two hours attended the ins and outs of the corruption of power, carried out by the Borgia, but most notably in one of the sons, Cesare Borgia, played by Sergio Peris Mencheta, character that served as a model to Machiavelli to write "The Prince".A film of these characteristics comparison with its precedent Alatriste is inevitable and plays in his favor, since the film, as a whole, Hernández is superior to Diaz Yanes. Also, perhaps, one tends to be more condescending to a product that has received less than half of the budget of the other. Well, as positive and last, point the direction of Antonio Hernández. It is successful, with many Visual ideas, is not happy to put the camera where less bother. Scenes such as dinner in the House of the Orsiny or muerte-nombramiento of new Pope (with the zenith level) show that the filmmaker has been involved in the film, which is equal to the best of our paísa, albeit unfortunately an unknown to the general public. Also sections such as costumes and art direction are also very accomplished, but it also helps the fact of having shot in the city of Rome itself. Photography is functional and little more to add, in this case "Alatriste" was more successful (in spite of, as already pointed out in its commentary, some scenes). The music of Ángel Illarramendi is present during all of the footage, and still remarkable, isn't at the height of his other works as the zeal, also suffers from resemble other works, if not for the melody, yes your orchestrations and other elements. But even with everything, gives packing the images, also aided by the fact that the scenes have not been comebacks, destroying the music as it occurs in Alatriste.En the downside the fact it is the reduced version of a television series, so several plot threads are left unfinished, although this is a detail in favourthe plot does not appear episodic, owing mainly to the leadership of Hernández which gives the narration of an enviable fluency. The performances of the cast are more diverse. On the one hand, Lluís Homar which performs a very risky approach to his character, touching the madness but without exaggeration (although there are moments which resembles characters played by Leslie Nielsen in their parodies), is difficult to categorize and perhaps for this reason cause controversy; on the other hand, Sergio Peris Mencheta leaves not stopped the lance, her performance without being exemplary or spectacular, is not negligible. Side as Antonio Dechent or Roberto Álvarez, are always well. But the rest of young faces proves to be the great mistake of the film, in fact, many of them, they are bent by dubbing actors. Special mention for María Valverde and his Lucrezia Borgia, a character which is able to detach from the legend, making it appear a girl's dad ñoña and silly, but at least she not has been dubbed. The rest of her teammates cast, with the exception of Ángela Molina and Paz Vega, have been. Perhaps they sought only beautiful bodies because abundant female nudity in the film. On the other hand, the script nor deepens in the plots or characters, being more oriented to the folletinesco side of the plot that delve a little on the characters.The film, despite the laudable efforts of Hernández, would need a larger budget to have a pack, a visual Bill much better. In short, it is an example of how a good direction can camouflage many defects, but not save a project when things as important as the acting and the script, play against. The funny thing is that even with everything, it is a pretty decent film.PS: I would put two and a half stars, I think that it is better than mediocre, but he would not consider her a good movie.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3004

Silvia Giner

Guardianes del día

muchocine

It is a film that is worth seeing and that eventually will become a cult film.

Timur Bekmambetov director of Soviet origin, attacks again after his success with "Guardian of the night" (Nochnoy dozor) releasing "Guardians of the day" (Dnevdoi dozor). If the first film in this series was good, this is even better. Particularly the way in which the director has embodied this Russian legend on the equilibrium of the forces of light and laoscuridad to my seems fascinating to me. Gives you a totally realistic perspective within the context fantastic Hollywood will serve to place securely between one of the most talented of the moment.Taking into account that a production is Russian, and the "limited" media and budgets that have these productions, "Guardians of the day" is a real achievement and success, as well as pride. Two and a half hours of footage that has made me enjoy as a dwarf, not only because faithful follower dce is this genre but because it is a film in which meet good special effects, good script and excellent interpretation.Talking about actors, as I have already said the direction of these seems fantastic, I can not put any but, because I can not find, all the characters from the fantastic point of view are accurately built and each of them has his personal inner drama, which enrriquece the plot of the film NO APTA PARA TODOS LOS PALATES.Aleksei Chadov is the great discovery of this saga. 25 years old and 15 films since 2002, has been an unstoppable career since it jump to fame thanks to "Guardians of the night" (Nochnoy dozor). For the moment is limited to productions Russian, but I'm sure that the talent of this Moscow will not go unnoticed by the Hollywood industry. Its freshness and naturalness to give life to the vampire kostya, make his face is unforgettable.Very notable interpretations of Mariya Poroshina (Svetla) and Konstantin Khabensky (Anton) both Russian and like Aleskei focused on cinema of this origin, although in the case of Konstantin has already managed to make the leap to Hollywood (thanks to the director of the saga) and currently shooting with Angelina Jolie and Morgan Freeman "Wanted", directed by Timur Bekmambetov and which will be released in Spanish cinemas on April 4, 2008.Para enjoy this film must be understood within its genre and context, as well as experience the flair of each of the creatures that make up the legend. Inexplicably critical eyes or the earthly public might perhaps find it strange or even boring, but this is no more than a sample of a low adaptive capacity and knowledge to what you see. "Guardians of the day" is a film that is worth seeing and that eventually will become a cult film. Concerning the past battles scenes, are very well shot and flat really beautiful General. I would like to mention the moment "Shower" of the two girls, that it seemed absolutely original and exciting. The soundtrack on occasions can be excentrica, good pro is typically Russian and as we do not have the ear accustomed therefore has a little bit.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1645

Luis Zueco

Closer

muchocine

Chive Owen, performed an interpretation of the sublime in his relationship with Julia Roberts, despite their corpulence of his physique, knows occur as helpless, weak and desperate.

Yesterday he had the pleasure to see the film "Closer" again, and the truth is that I liked more than when he saw brand new. Of course there are two performances on leave on the Quartet of actors, the two that we consider most secondary within the fame which have four. Are Clive Owen, excellent, intelligent at the same time simple. But a simplicity of those which is not exactly a bad thing, but just the opposite, of a man who makes her his strength. Someone who sees things so clear that they have the intelligence of draw roads as who draws straight lines with a ruler on a map on the table. The great Natali Portman, of which you can not fall in love over and over again. Here it's an excellent role, especially in the scene in which leaves her boyfriend, how someone can happen to a person madly to let her love, not hate her, but simply not wanting.But turning to chive Owen, performed an interpretation of the sublime in his relationship with Julia Roberts, despite their corpulence of his physique, knows as someone helpless, weak and desperate. Thus making guilty to Julia Roberts, who is vilely emotionally blackmailed by him. What makes Clint in the film happens in reality though normally not we realize. There are cases in which a person to retain your partner, who already don't feel absolutely anything for her, what does is play to make her feel guilty. And no one likes to feel guilty of the evils of other, even more if we wanted them to ever. Guilt is a great weapon in the hands of someone like Clive who know how to use it in such a way that it binds first to Julia Roberts and then pulls her until he returned to his side, which will hardly already separate. Here Clive demonstrates the strength of the weak, that not for the sensitive. Clive romantically manipulates Julia Roberts as you want, using his sense of guilt, while the really sensitive, helpless and insecure is the other male protagonist, Jude Law, however it at least does not use guilt, not takes advantage of this. That happens that at the end end of losing everything, just to have something of dignity. But in love, in life, we must choose, or have enough dignity to not manipulate people or take advantage of it, which hardly we reach something, or if, by what you surely get much of what we propose, even happiness, but at that price.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1580

Caruco

Cartas desde Iwo Jima

muchocine

May it lack of exceptional originality, or maybe that you like more or less, but it is a gift for the good lover of cinema.

"Letters from Iwo Jima" has its own entity, it is autonomous. But it is inevitable to see as the reverse, or the complement, "Flags of our fathers", the diptych that Clint Eastwood has done so many eager energy, despite his 76 years.Now, this invisible enemy, these almost-Martians who emerged from the underground with their weapons, or appeared in the middle of the night to jump over their victims in "Flags of our fathers", materialize and become flesh and blood, and also alma. Becoming in addition the contrast of these photogenic heroes that raised a flag in the Suribachi.Unos mount, Americans, used as icons of mass to raise funds for the war coffers. The other, heroes anonymous, whose last letters even reach their recipients.And together, the two movies, compose a recovery of the historical memory. Eastwood, during the massive presentation in "Letters from Iwo Jima" Japan, it seemed outrageous that the majority of young repudiation completely what has happened on the island of Iwo Jima in the World War II, where more than 20,000 compatriots lost their lives.We are all human beings.But above all, and was not to expect less, it is a story full of humanity. It highlights what should prevail is the individual above the absurdity of the war (or not so absurd to those who benefit economic, political or strategic), even if it is rational over the concept of the collective of "patria".It is clear that, for someone who poses his eyes in the Empire of the rising sun, the gaze of Eastwood is a Westerner. Although support in the indent of a Japanese Rookie, Iris Yamashita, the end and Cape, is a Connecticut Yankee in the Japanese Court who dares talk about characters and concepts far removed from his mind and world.However, his perspective is appropriate because, ultimately, what tells us is exactly the same. A Baker of Osaka or Tokyo, is what you want to translate Eastwood, just like one of Oklahoma or Kentucky; and all feel their fears, all have left behind something or simply all struggle to prevent their "homeland", or the future of their children, from falling into the hands of foreign barbarians.It is the battle of human beings with the same feelings of doubt and fear, with the family, wives, children and that life they had and who was forced to leave. In one of those details that are more significant than they appear to the naked eye, even the protagonist, general Kuribayashi (Ken Watanabe), professional, worship and tight, almost apologizes in one of his letters to his wife for the fact of having left outstanding, so everyday things how to fix the floor of the kitchen.The true triumph.Eastwood gives his vision of the Japanese perspective more intimate, and away from the parallel Assembly, between the front and the media circus that underwent the American heroes return to the United States.UU. The music of Michael Stevens and his son Kyle Eastwood, is as minimalist as effective, and appeals directly to the sensitivity. And the monocromatismo of photography, adapted to the coldness of this volcanic rock which is Iwo Jima, gives the film a more virtuous.It is also extraordinary, elegant, balanced and charismatic, the interpretation of Ken Watanabe, and Tsuyoshi Ihara, as Baron Nishi, and Olympic "hero" in riding.It may the content of "Letters from Iwo Jima" lack of an exceptional originality, or maybe you like more or less, but it is a gift for the good lover of cinema. And, like Mel Gibson in "Apocalypto", to highlight the courage of its author in this effort so that copies are exhibited worldwide in original version subtitled. This will make that they dramatically reduced sales of popcorn and entries in the multiplex; but the film, and in a way no less splendid, win.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/308

Oscar Cantero

Bandidas

muchocine

Bandidas is closer to a movie on a certain scale than to a feature-length film. Mediocre.

Sara Sandoval and María Álvarez (Penélope Cruz and Salma Hayek) are two girls from opposing social classes. While the first enjoys all the privileges and leads a quiet and affluent life, the other is the daughter of a humble agricultural pawn. Under normal conditions, prevailing in the nineteenth century social immobility and rigidity, these two girls have never engaged in friendship; but when a few mercenaries murder the families of both and steal their land for handing them over to a few greedy and greedy businessmen, have just been reunited and fighting together in pursuit of a vendetta that it eventually turn them into atracadoras and prófugas of justice. Directed by Joachim Roenning (producer of the three burials of MILTIADES Estrada and Transporter 2) and Espen Sandberg, Bandidas is a half of the Western film and half comedy, but precisely because of this duality will not just be nothing in particular. Penelope Cruz, however much that put it in lists of glamorous or favorite of the public, is an actress that exceptions, has not done anything to have the popularity and the cache which enjoys; It is extremely deadpan, poor records and artificial in the interpretation. Salma Hayek sins otherwise than our compatriot: is too exaggerated in the gesture, full of unnecessary fuss. Unfair would be not to mention the more than correct interpretation of Sam Shepard, jutting from the mediocrity. Its main writer Luc Besson has demonstrated on other occasions that it is capable of doing rather better, and broadly Bandidas is closer to a movie on a certain scale than to a feature-length film. Mediocre.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2327

Rafa Delgado

Memorias de una Geisha

muchocine

The film adaptation of the best-selling?Memoirs of a geisha? He is victim of a mediocre direction and a script with more holes than a Gruyère cheese. Its excessive length and its claims to great movie make viewing becomes slow and heavy.

A couple of master sequences, an excellent technical invoice and a few actresses on their site, not save to a suspense film. The film adaptation of the best-selling?Memoirs of a geisha? He is victim of a mediocre direction and a script with more holes than a Gruyère cheese. Its excessive length and its claims to great movie make the projection becomes slow and heavy, especially in large part from the beginning and from the half. Does rob Marshall leaves in evidence the excellent?Chicago? He went of chiripa, fruit of his remarkable talent with music, something that demonstrates perfectly in two or three scenes of the film which holds this critical.Sigh to think about what you could have done Steven Spielberg if instead of producing it had directed (that was on the verge) this literary adaptation of the novel by Arthur Golden. And even if they had left the project in the hands of a director, Japanese and Japanese cast. Eeeen fin, a pity?

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/213

Jose Luis

El código Da Vinci

muchocine

A tape that is intended to be serious and realistic, but forget altogether that the novel original is a novel entertainment

A couple of years ago a film unwittingly I take hair to many of the viewers and it is not that you have lied them, but that if it presented the plot in a realistic way, almost like a documentary, what caused that many people be her projected asking, inquiring and browsing the newly emerging internet trying to discover if the plot of the film had happened really. The film is called the project of the Blair Witch, and the phenomenon apparently is about to derepetirse the code Da Vinci.Y film is that all we like stories of mystery and conspiracy and more if a tape like this, "reveals" more or less credibly a "secret" jealously guarded for centuries, with the "potential" to change our history, because the truth does not need us much on our side to create a realistic fantasy.I must confess that I am one of the millions of readers who have been seduced by the "Developer" book and that I remained until the wee hours of the morning reading and reading trying to figure out what the next track, which is the next key to be resolved, so entertaining and intriguing was that on more than one occasion reached exclaim: "one chapter and I sleep."Change the tape, on the other hand, rather than take advantage of the exciting and fun book, aspect focuses on creating a drama, a tape that claims to be serious and realistic, forgets completely that the novel is a novel entertainment. So intense persecution, threats and fights are replaced by scenes quenarran the "true story" of Mary Magdalene, with two separate produced Flash backsque go back to two thousand years ago.The long minutes and even hours that Robert Langdon and company spend trying to decipher the intricate mysteries and codes, in the tape are resolved instantly with a photographic memory and other more characteristic of a X-Men.Y skills although it seems impossible, writer failed to copy the plot as is and in its attempts to "improve" became a long experiencetedious and cold flooded abusively flashbacks trying to tell the past of some of the characters, but forgetting altogether give growth during the plot, blurring them only as one ingredient, to make complete the gimmick and not as true drivers of history.And fails, in addition, to the portray with more strength the relationship between the two protagonists, which in the book is very important and in the beginning of the tape her force, so a few minutes both are fleeing.But perhaps the most unforgivable mistake, to my point of view, is that production achievement strain to the Museum of Louvre, filming in the Grand Hall, managed to have access to the most famous painting in the world, to waste a couple of simple shots. A great failure for all involved, except for Sir Ian McKellen, printing charm to his character and now one of my favorite actors.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4082

Rafa Ferrer

Los Crímenes de Oxford

muchocine

From the beginning one intuits that is before something big with this excellent level sequence where we can see the characters, the best I've seen in movies much, long, in addition to the dialogues; an excellent work of Alex de La Iglesia...

Said Alex of the Anglican (its director) in one of the multitudinous interviews granted on the occasion of the premiere of the film, which had distanced himself a bit of commercial cinema because he did not want to go asking permission always producers to make "his" film, am sorry to say, Mr of the Church that if there is a film of his career to bitto say nothing, have to do with it is this that today brings us, where we see or phlegm geek that often accompany him, nor the bad baba of many of his scripts, or that air distracted and sometimes maquiavelicamente illustrated their previous tape; Moreover, and returning to his words I would say that while he categorically stated that he didn't want to make a film in Hollywood of test, I would say that perhaps, and surreptitiously this was (along with the bizarre "Perdita Durango") the best letter of presentation of the Basque director towards the Anglo-Saxon market perhaps should believe us that a tape with Elijah Wood and John Hurt (which in Spain have given by baptize as "Elijah")?Leonor Watling, Julie Cox, Burn Gorman, Anna Massey and Jim Carter among others. You will only see in our country? Leaving aside that this is perhaps the most impersonal tape of the Church (only the bizarre character of Alex Cox is part of this monstrous visual imagery of the Basque director), are faced with a great movie.From the beginning one intuits that is before something big with this excellent level sequence where we can see the characters, the best I've seen in movies much, long, in addition to the dialogues; I had read for why this tape was lost in dialogue impossible, however for my all that verbiage mathematical isn't over a tape where the mystery is in the theorems and other formulas and says it someone is not very versed in theorems and always 2 + 2 is equal to 5. the setting of Oxford, the University City, the Salamanca of England is one character again, with their large roofs, their students from here to there and the racking, frantic quasi of the great Anglo-Saxon towns.Of the actors, I'll take both Hurt (overflows on screen just appear), as Elijah that not can stand out from his role as Frodo Baggins in no time as well as sexy Leonor Watling that. In short, impossible to express in words what that woman transmits with her eyes and her body (and some part of her upper Anatomy), apologize in advance for comment so unfortunate to feminists who I read.Is true that the final resolution (and with this term) is somewhat dodgier, but ultimately we have a Mystery Thriller and always, or almost always, the culprit is who is less imagine, and much more stupid resolution of what our heads could devise.In short, an excellent work of Alex de La Iglesia, outside their usual environment.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/756

Francisco Bellón

Yo soy la juani

muchocine

More than a fiction film should be considered only as an exemplary testimony to the reality of a good part of the youth Spanish current, and as such it is worth seeing her.

There are some filmmakers that for one reason or another, by the talent they have, the themes, or a mixture of both, never leave anyone indifferent. There are many makers that fit this description in Spanish film, and Catalan Bigas Luna is without doubt a clear example. Films such as the ages of Lulu, ham, ham or eggs of gold are already part of the mythology of the cinematography Spanish (not only for having discovered and consecrated to Javier Bardem and Penelope Cruz), and assumed a new way of understanding the narration in the film. Now, five years after Son of sea, Bigas Luna presenting to the public its vision of the icon of Spanish modern women, Juani.Con this new film, Bigas Luna was looking also for the discovery of a new actress, and this was dedicated six months looking for the perfect interpreter to give life to this new icon. Juani (Verónica Echegui) is a young woman who dreams of becoming an actress and be a great Star, despite his ailing father and the neighborhood where he lives, a backwater of the peripheries of a big city. Her boyfriend Jonah (Dani Martin) are passionate about the tuning, to the point of live dedicated to body and soul. The Juanita and her best friend Vane (Laya Martí) decide to go to Madrid to succeed, but once there they discover that success doesn't conquer so easily. The best quality of Bigas Luna in the film is the portray a social reality that a good part of the population is unknown or facing another part. The characters, their character, their environment, the way in which expressed their dreams and ambitions, through tuning, are reflected to perfection. However, admittedly fiction that stands on such recreation is quite weak, without force or excitement. The script is simple and predictable, the characters neither move nor evolve, and the plot is unable to or engage the viewer more predisposed to do so; that Yes, sometimes is seen submerged in a visual and musical binge without apparent end. Note to the League intended to make a sequel, if accompanied by the blessing of the ever-changing public. For its part, the actors are in general in a tone of medium-high, although without fanfare by none of them.I am the Juani, rather than a fiction film should be considered only as an exemplary testimony of the reality of a good part of today's Spanish Youth, and as such worth seeing her.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1980

JLO

Fuimos soldados

muchocine

Film false, hypocritical and sanctimonious you will need much the people of the North after 11/09 but here makes it they lengthen the minutes and be shortened more patience, with an unbearable war movie.

War film describes based on real events, the leadership of Colonel Hal Moore (Mel Gibson) at the head of his troops, sent to Viet Nam to meet a kamikaze mission, interspersed with family relations of these and their regret.Its director, Randall Wallace (brave heart, Pearl Harbor) is showing us the side of more humane war - if any - next to the relations between the soldiers and their environment without depriving yourself of the bloody scenes of combat (which they are not bad but they are not much), and countless cheap shots that have more than two hours of this film.All are brave, they are all good, all are great soldiers; all stereotypes and characters already displayed a thousand times too much, these past years (the soldier Ryan, the fall of the Black Hawk, codes of war).The most successful is the gaze of the Vietnamese Colonel, parallel to Colonel Moore, reflecting their similarities knowing that they are the two side of the same coin. Although really, if one does memory and recalls the portrait and human profile of recruits of born to kill shown by Kubrick, or below, the lyricism of Terrence Mallick's La Delgada line red, it ceases to be original to become a school manual look.Another case is that of Mel Gibson. Being a conservative Puritan fan in real life, choose (or imposes?) roles with a strong religious connotation (signals) that already in these times begins to tire.With all the elements trodden the gender and exaggerated until the exasperation: dies first the black, then the recent father, Yankee flying in the foreground every twenty minutes, flag with final obvious, chato and corny, phrases of the style: "Tell my wife that I love her" - of course, one second before you die-, make this, a film false, hypocritical and sanctimonious you will need much the people of the North after 11/09, but here does is they lengthen the minutes and be shortened more patience, with an unbearable war movie.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2067

Emilio Calvo de Mora

La maldición de la flor dorada

muchocine

A relevant movie, a visual spectacle of first order which made me remember, at times, the hue between the circus and the transcendent of Cirque Soleil. Pure gold: a unique visual entertainment, a remarkable finding.

Zhang Yimou is no longer the poet intimate, Chinese director who signed / filmed the Red Lantern, back in the early nineties: now is the dazzling artifice of visual pirotecnica rare, stunning and beautiful. Yimou is a master whose talent is to seek us beauty, give us an exercise in low plastic affectation the that fascinating, flows a way of understanding the film to which we were not accustomed. The brittle, weak and melodramatic hisatoria of this Chinese dynasty enfangada betrayals, deceit and passions to the purest style SOAP Televisa accurate so overwhelming wrap, incorporated in a suit, so rich and expensive, so hypnotic that there comes a time in which the story not have her characters nor are his dialogues that explicit plot developments but the costumes, the apotheosis of mass movements in battles, choreographed with a sense of the detail cuasipornográfico had already wanted to Yes Zack Snyder in his wonderful 300. The bombastic staging not abotarga the viewer's attention: it adrenaliza, subjected her to an iconic overload that comes out unscathed, although crippled, fascinated. That the story is leaden seal, plumbate and plañidera? Delighted to agree who thus intends to lower the film and aesthetic - pictorial magnificence which are three different issues although vectorized into a same essence, pleasure, knowledge, art - this film? Even the reduced set of scenes of martial arts has seemed competent, not being me - whatsoever - fervent fan of such excesses. There are characters to middle ride, stories that come from old and placed on the story before the film and are not convincingly told, there are actors that are not at the height (the children, in general), there are aspects that did not go unnoticed by very trudge we have the experience to chromatic level, their textures in his admirable and more than fluid mounting: all apologized, everything that I excuse. The curse of the Golden Flower is a relevant film, a visual spectacle of first order which made me remember, at times, the hue between the circus and the transcendent of Cirque Soleil, which I could see and enjoy this summer in Malaga. And that it seems by the enthusiasm on the iconic plan the narrative thing has been neglected: the script, with a few very fragile mimbres, with a simple story worthy of cthat a NAP with TV humming an archetypal SOAP, is worn with care, bringing the essence that suits each level (when custom debieramos think that the level is which goes to look at each tab of the script of the film).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/164

Jamfris

Ice age 2 el deshielo

muchocine

Succession of very good gags hilvanados with a little story with small interludes of the squirrel

Do a couple of weeks ago we went to the cinema to see this film to the film, as he was eager to? already with the first I enjoyed it very much, and hoped that this not me disappointment. I loved the movie.The argument is not too complicated, basically, a fairly large group of animals kills the time in a valley next to the glacier, the prehistoric squirrel still in search of its do nut? It avellana?, and the mammoth Manny, believed to be the last of its species is a female specimen with which try to flirt? a from there little secret.I think that compared to the first, this suffers from a much less elaborate script, is rather a succession of very good gags hilvanados with a little story with small interludes of the squirrel, some posts a little with shoehorn. Something like what's happening with Shrek 1 and 2. The history of the first is very good, and in the second they are limited to chaining jokes.Do anyway that not worthy the final result, which is very fun, especially with the inclusion of two new characters, opossums, comic relief? and very comical. They have a pair of stellar moments (when making the gesture of "I am watching" or the farewell to the rapper) and in general are the best of the film. Others maintain the level, Diego teeth less fierce sable and a kind of parody of and-go-a-la-ruin scurry (reference Prachettiana), which would be able to sell his mother.At a technical level, is the animation really elaborated, especially regarding animal hairs, although the can of water is also very well done? do while in this type of films becomes a secondary argument? I am referring, of course, important thing is more history/characters, although it is always appreciated that the representation is worked.No doubt a highly recommended film for all audiences, ideal to spend a fun and entertaining film time.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2929

Rafa Delgado

Hairspray

muchocine

Imagine a musical film in which there nor an only moment of relaxation, nor a single moment in which the rate decline, and that almost most of its footage you enter a terrible get up seat and get dancing desire.

Imagine a musical film in which there is a single moment of rest, nor a single moment in which the rate decline, and that almost most of its footage you enter a terrible get up seat and get dancing desire.Well, thats Hairspray.Salvo Christopher Walken (which, as said in the journal news images, is somewhat clueless) and John Travolta (it's funny in all of his appearances, but expressivity is zero), all the cast, especially young people (although Zac Efron not convinced), is immense. Note that James Marsden that passes it big, and a Michelle Pfeiffer playing his character perfectly.All give the size in a musical where the discrimination of any kind has no place. That is precisely the message of a film that is all optimism, color, sense of humor and rhythm, much rhythm. Because the soundtrack (winner of 8 Tony, the Broadway Oscar Awards) is a real delight within the genre of musical film, and there is no number that do not move, at least a couple of times the skeleton. Highlight of the entire film Good morning Baltimore, I can hear the bells (hilarious musical numbers that serve as presentation of the character of Tracy Turnblad), Nices kids in town, Welcome to the 60's, Run and tell that, Big, blonde & Beautiful, Without Love, and an Orgasmic finale of more than ten minutes to the rhythm of the best song from the musical, You can't stop the beatIt's worth its three puntacos in the final grade for the film.It is a movie for you pass it well, and leave out any movie buff prejudice that you get to have normally in a movie theater.Some of the drawbacks without much importance in the film are some plot inconsistencies (a crush sudden, as if by magic), some dialogues and situations a tad corny (though I think that dubbing has much of the blame. Although it is not a voice for nothing wrong) and topical, something disneyanos, but you forget everything nothing more start any musical number, because these are the real driving force of the film. Or also all the music belongs to the score of the musical, and that not be smell anything at all music of the sixties and its freshness, as it could be in the original movie of the same title by John Waters.Respecto to the differences between the original of John Waters, and this adaptation of the Broadway musical, are obvious: athe original, is, as told me a friend on MSN, more hardcore and perraca, with a more irreverent and politically incorrect humor, mark of the House of John Waters, the King of the film garbage and/or freak (title who has won at pulse). And most recently, as it has much to do with the original, but at the same time not. It is the same story, but in terms of music, and much more sweetened and politically correct than the other; but social criticism is still present. Me of John Waters, despite Divine and some comic points quite aplaudibles, not me eventually convince, but it does. For something as simple as me I had better seeing it.I am convinced that many people will enter the room with many prejudices, for several reasons. To begin with, is a musical, and that is something that in our country do not like too, and I do not understand why, if they are a joy, and the ultimate expression of what is likely to do in a movie (that operates almost all media existing in the film). Would then be the same prejudices which criticizes the film: physicists and racial, but above all physicists. I bet a hand to someone loose a derogatory comment out loud to see how hypnotically menea skeleton Nikki Blonsky, or see how a guaperas guy prefers a fat girl to a blonde despamanante. and already qualify for the film of directly shit. Because people are so of garrula.I am also convinced that many people allegedly movie fan will not accept the film because it is so optimistic that spreads. And clear, the optimistic and even repipi, which is full of colorful and preaching the flower-power, it seems fashion for those who carry glasses of pasta. Unless it comes signed by managers typically turn cools.Since they lose it.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2005

Tito Chinchan

Spiderman 3

muchocine

Fairly loose movie with great special effects and some other things. But with a convoluted storyline with characters that try to be complex, but become ridiculous. Why not they do this? We want to eat popcorn while desenganchamos the brain.

It already begins, it starts already. That, which aren't trailers. Papa, when does the bat? That is another, do not you learn. Chissst, that is already beginning. Yum, yum, yum, chup chup chup, rasss, rassss. There goes piderman, there goes, there goes. Give them strong. Pope have pis. Tooomaaa, tooomaaa. Mabuuuurroooo. Is how much it? Are you going to die? Pope, I have dream. Ñiaaaauuuunnnn. (Note from a server, not her see in morning session, which is filled with children, heh, heh)The film is about a boy that has a superpower that makes man Spider (for those who do not know the saga). The plot of this third installment is divided into several stories. On the one hand Spider-man has become popular hero and all is well, with you something external you have to ruin the life. His girlfriend goes from triumphant to the harsh reality. Their enemies are still hating. UM, now that I think about always.I have to admit that I bored as a sleepless bear during hibernation. On the positive side we have that special effects are amazing, but as we are already getting used to these things, therefore not surprise us. Soundtrack says my medium Zucchini which is also fine, but my felt me appropriate in some fight scenes. And some moments of Peter Parker are very funny. In the flat, else negative. The argument is very strange, given that in a film where we hope a frenetic pace, put us much roll. The man of sand is too Mystic. The Spiderman with teeth if that cool, resentful and bad host. The normal Spider-man does rare things that are not understood. Black Spiderman also cool. And the son of the Goblin is bland and even absurd.In short, fairly loose movie with great special effects and some other things. But with a convoluted storyline with characters that try to be complex, but become ridiculous. Why not they do this? We want to eat popcorn while desenganchamos the brain.A roll.Besitos.P.D: The kiss of Spider-man did not believe nobody, is absurd.Pd2: As mola dentudo spidy, shame to leave so little.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3400

Andrés Pons

El anticristo

muchocine

Horrifically evil moments filmed with an aura of nightmare that could be felt at every level, totally credible interpretations above all of the dazzling star accompanied by a spectral soundtrack gave him a pesadillesco aspect today not leave indifferent.

Alberto de MARTINO is another of the great Italian directors of the time that exploited piece any success of the moment or fashion with lower budgets.Author among others of Holocaust 2000, puma man etc. Amply demonstrated the talent of a good worker of the genre which confers always entertainment pleasant despite modest budgets and little original scripts or literally copied.Other names are in all good exploitation, screenwriter VINCENZO MANNINO was a collaborator of RUGGERO DEODATO in work not too familiar "The conquerors of Atlantis or gang of future".On the picture one of the key names of the time provided their services, JOE D´ AMATO author among many of GOMIA. Terror in the Aegean Sea.Among the cast include ARTHUR KENNEDY that same year acted in the Spanish, not desecrate the dead dream, great MEL FERRER who with his career playing end could not stop participate in series b, death trap, the attack of the Atomic including ZOMBIES. The protagonist CARLA GRAVINA had enormous prestige films in his filmography. RUFUFU, first love, showed his great acting.With all these names under the good the Director you can enjoy a dignísima sample of visceral horror. A really terrifying principle with great atmosphere in all its scenes contributed you a really chilling dramatic density.Horrifically evil moments filmed with an aura of nightmare that could be felt at every level, totally credible interpretations above all of the dazzling star accompanied by a spectral soundtrack gave him a pesadillesco aspect today not leave indifferent.Little budget left to notice a makeup and Visual effects something poor though not claw him removed at any time.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3818

Andrés Pons

La Búsqueda: El Diario Secreto

muchocine

Repeats the director returns to manage effectively the loose budget to provide an effective entertainment and little more.

Do not think to roll me the slightest to comment on a film which is a photocopy of the search of about three years ago. Neither better nor worse simply more of the same to try to repeat the success that especially the protagonist NICOLAS CAGE after failures of the caliber of NEXT, the Remake of the WICKER MAN needs urgently to succeed at the box office to keep his star status.Repeats the same cast with contributions from ED HARRIS "goodbye little goodbye" or the escarizada by the Queen HELEN MIRREN in food roles to keep their accounts in high.Repeats the director returns to manage effectively the loose budget to provide an effective entertainment and little more.All the technical effects are of the highest level not in vain the producer is the Almighty JERRY BRUCKHEIMER is currently the Messiah of entertainment with sagas so productive as pirates of the Caribbean.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/183

Enrique Colmena

Misión imposible 3

muchocine

To see if it will now have to apologize for entertain the public with dignity...

Let's go by parts: has dispatched critical this third segment of the saga of "Mission impossible" Kashmiris it, disparagingly, as "pure entertainment". So what? Pure entertainment are not masterpieces such as "Treasure island", "Journey to the center of the Earth" or "Moby Dick"? To see if it will now have to apologize for entertain the public with dignity.Having said that, do not want to say that "Mission: Impossible III" is a masterpiece, or much less: it has great strength in an electrifying start, reminiscent of the best Tarantino sadomasochism, and continues with good pulse, with action scenes splendidly settled, such as the persecution of the helicopters in the field of ghostly mills of wind or the fighter attack on the bridge. Then certainly the tone decays, especially when we have to begin to explain the reasons for the betrayals (what would the series, despite the quasi redundancy, without betrayal), but even so the tone is, in general, satisfactory. There, it is true, reading about issues, but nor asked, as no one in their right mind is what he had asked, in due course, to the splendid eponymous television series that arrulló children's dreams of an entire generation that today is (or appears to be). adult.They are, of course, the typical facial masks that hide figures, which is one of the "leitmotif" inevitable in the series, both television and film, and there is certainly impossible scenes, such as balancing the hero of a building to another in Shanghai, with free fall through an inclined roof, a nonsense of impossibility, but that is more alluring. So things, J.J. Abrams, the creator of series televisvas of worship as "Lost", is confirmed as a man of good pulse also as director, which is his first big screen film. Cruise is already very secure in his role as Ethan Hunt, which he has taken the measure, and is convincing. But what takes the cake is, certainly a Philip Seymour Hoffman, newly oscarizado by "Truman Capote", which makes here a villain that leave footprint: cold, absolutely devoid of scruples and feelings, a bad beast with esmóquin that may require from a post in the Olympus of the big bad of the film.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4202

Tito Chinchan

La quinta del porro

muchocine

Anti mili pamphlet with the word truño which fits perfectly. It has three funny expressions, a type that looks like Eugene and a girl in pelotas. And even so, I has repugnado. Fuck that bad.

Director: Francesc Bellmunt. duration: 107 minutes.Release date: 21 January 1989, although authorized in the 1980s, with what we have another errata, or it is that so great shit there was no güevos to release soon.Spectators: 1.237.461 human beings, since is this data, I have frozen pussy of the scare.In life there are films that a person may be called truño, being so wide. But when that Word mentions it a server who has swallowed cagarros and the size of a trolebus Cairns, it takes another dimension. So great is the truño, I'm going to inaugurate the truñoteca for those movies worse than bad. Of those that you are sure that the director is is starting laughing at home saying, "and people are viewing the kidding this I did for everyone laugh".The film is about a fifth (rather than beer) that have to be incorporated to the mili from Barcelona to Morocco. So a train is with all future soldiers, chosen motifs among the stereotypes more absurd that you can lend to the face. And then some arkhan, others makes it crap and you think incredulous "do so little worth my time so I am losing with such truño?".Poor Álvaro de Luna, of hardship that had to happen in life to accept this "film". The script is a total and absolute nonsense. But not a funny and absurd, if not a shit boat nonsense. The actors are the worst of the worst, '' embutidos '' in tontísimos stereotypes. The plot is non-existent, and the worst comes when approaching the end. It is they breaking us an anti-war pamphlet that to me, a declared military anti me stirred the guts up to almost convince me to enlist me. But if I was not able to move couch to turn off the TV, as to go to hit shots. Than more bad laziness.In short, pamphlet anti mili with the word truño which fits perfectly. It has three funny expressions, a type that looks like Eugene and a girl in pelotas. And even so, I has repugnado. Fuck that bad.Besitos.P.D: I have the doubt to see that more than one million people have seen the film. If someone from the time her went to see the film, I would ask your opinion. It is that I can't believe that someone you may like this.Pd2: Another question, why such monstrosity needed five writers? Me he surprised when I saw the credits, but has come me to mind now.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1785

Emilio Calvo de Mora

La cosecha

muchocine

Muddy and predictable ration of biblical ghosts of Apostolic disasters that smell blockbuster of giant poster on the door of the video store, infumable sweet for some palates and attractive pasa-ratos for whom, in the background, not asking for much, except a bit of amenity. In that regard, entertaining, very biblical, is.

There as an archaeology of the Apocalypse, desire to confine the chaos and the enigmas of biblical nature in noveladas frames, suitable for immediate commercial consumption. As if theology could be reduced to distraimiento's Sunday supplement. The side effects of the tsunami Dan Brown dan frugal phenomena media who appeal to the religious startle, to the remote and revolutionary possibility of subverting the metaphorical or mythological scaffolding of Christianity and turn it into a master hack, in a deception lasted for two miraculous millennia.Just go to the shelf of any Bookstore news to understand the monstrous extent of this trend which now seems an epidemic. The harvest joins this anthology of the Ecumenical nonsense and confirms the idea that the viewer undemanding - soon of happy - going to leave happy and proud, convinced that their natural supernatural concerns have had a messianic, majestic, overwhelming and undeniable audio-visual support. Biblical plagues, miracles, antichrists and bastardías several of our Lord Jesus Christ snatch the formal believer and distract who only seek distraction. To all the others who create or not, are happy to care of forms and a competent livelihood of dramatic films such as harvesting bring fresco. Open you a little more eyes on the forced scenes of infographic luxury (here is, there is no doubt) and will break in yawning when the director deal with intermediate footage with gilipollescos dialogues and pseudoscientific justifications. The thin line between faith and superstition comes from the master in the management of a computer with a graphics card potenta.Frivolous, halfway between the biblical thriller and the apocalyptic docudrama, the film dispenses with all literary interest and makes his possible interest (not is it arrebatemos soon) in the expertise of the post-production, of course. This fantasy of loose budget adheres to a potentially harmful gender: the apocalyptic thriller, suspense with mystical speculative. I fear the worst: fear they freedom these incursions in the old and New Testament books fantastic, in the literal sense of the term, but indicators, ultimately, of the little imaginative bravery of the new writers of the cinema, that they are fleeing risk as if it were a cloud of locusts and embrace, impúdicamente, to this inexhaustible Philo and, to the amazement of producers, golosísimo for the viewer easily impressionable. It is only a matter of wait a few weeks and see how the film argues on screen, stealing his poster to other proposals which are less spectacular but more vitamin of cinema, of interest, of honesty.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/456

Marta

La joven del agua

muchocine

An extrañísima, too forced, story told as if such a thing. The result, as well as predictable and disappointing, it is boring.

I believe that there are few directors capable of having a career so short and at the same time as irregular as M. Night Shyamalan. It is difficult to believe the infumable "signals", with Mel Gibson taking advantage to give lessons in morality as he flees the alien's work of the same Director that "The sixth sense", one of the best films of suspense in recent years. Thus, the premiere of "The girl in the water" was a mystery. It would be great? Would it be acceptable? It would be very bad? To me I found disappointing. Very disappointing. I have read several reviews that praise. Normally, they claim a kind of right to create worlds full of fantasy film. All of that is great. Personally, I like the idea of raising what would happen if the magic entered the world of the everyday. Equal to make already in the "protected", where showed us the emergence of a typical superhero comic - included - in a family environment characteristic and supervillain uniform, Shyamalan not puts the actors in "The girl in the water" in an enchanted forest, but the pool of a few blocks of buildings. The characters in the story have their correspondence in ordinary people and the environment is familiar, as if what happens could happen, in fact, to anyone. The problem of the film is not this approach, but the way to solve it. Unlike "The sixth sense", where the viewer would discover the secrets little by little, the narrative pace of "The girl in the water" is excessively precipitate. Not allow to immerse themselves in the history to the rhythm of the protagonist, but soon since everything happened. She is already there, we all know who is and what is happening and nobody has had time nor surprising. Only have to wait the end, arriving after a couple of turns very simplistic and predictable - nothing to do with, for example, "the forest" (to cite one example that is not "The sixth sense"). The characters, on the other hand, are too flat. How can be a group of seemingly so different people react exactly like an incredible situation? Shyamalan knows this. Not me. Finally, the "explanation", appearing in the form of neighbouring tale, is too forced. An extrañísima story, told as if such a thing. And it is already. The result, as well as predictable and disappointing, it is boring. What could have been a beautiful film about the fantasy that could come at any time in our day to day is something to forget. Some say that Disney must be suffering for having let slip to M. Night Shyamalan. I rather think that it is breathing relieved.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/888

Daniel Galindo

El camino de los ingleses

muchocine

In this suggestive and suicide formal bet coldness guides us by marshy land, emotional spaces that accomplice who trust in him comes the director with the help.

Feelings and painful memories, pirouettes risky with the camera and editing. Flags has made a difficult film but it is, that no doubt, his film.The most thorny paths are that, upon completion, give more satisfaction. It is this proposal new, different and difficult to defend against the purists. A flight of conventional makes the story of Antonio Soler shine with force on the screen although it is sometimes lost between daydreams and details. Easy to argue, difficult to contextualize in formal terms, the tape has in their top 5 minutes the best business card. A sequence in a hospital, with many elements anticipatory, keeps us in tension to make way for a more manners tale, 4 friends arriving in a swimming pool. After the sample of courtesy, filmmaker chooses to straighten the road and delete all halo of realism.We not raise the question of if a filmmaker must do a film for him, for the enjoyment of the majority, to make some with fewer ties to enter their world. We have the film more staff that can become an author, which travels through the land of emotions with the maxim, always present, looking back is painful.Permeates flags photography sadness and melancholy. They surround the imagined and therefore biased portrayal: you can't see the whole levels are foreshortening, abound insignificant details in appearance and play with the frames. Works with sensitive material, so its characters may be lost? and with them the viewer - in the existential anguish. Still points to the optimism that only they can count on enough courage not to deal with the destination, but to live to the fullest, precisely because the capricious fate imposed when it wants to.Domina poetic accent without that language is artificial. Translate metaphors in images, escape the costumbrismo, also of the action and perhaps sinneth spend footage to present the characters, but it is in fact nothing happens and everything happens. As Pablo Aranda in his novel the other city, its own city, with scarce set flags relating to foreigners and few anchorages at the time, have fairly with his interior and airtight, world away from social and political events. We know that is based on the novel of Soler, but that only persists the germ: everything is new on this nothing RESTful trip for a summer dominated by anxiety.In this suggestive and suicide formal bet coldness guides us by marshy land, emotional spaces that accomplice who trust in him comes the director with the help. This viewer will have felt the Canora that tells emotions, memories and dreams, making the pinch in the stomach does not allow to relax until the end, 10 minutes where the Swans sing his agonizing singing. In the skin of revered authors for their upset the film concept, why won't have to endure the comments of those who wait the typical generational film of young people seeking to make their way. Out by the tangent and thank many was you, maybe when you spend some time: poetic and evocative reflection will be like one of those gems that many recur years after having criticized. And flags, the director, will remain in constant search of his own way. You will see.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3181

Rafa Ferrer

Lío embarazoso

muchocine

A tape that judging by its title you can reject, and that however, and removing a good handful of absurdities may become like some and terrify others, specially dedicated to all those who intend to become pregnant in the near future.

For some time this part one is starting: Park the animosity I feel towards the romantic comedy (and just seeing the force thanks / because of my wife), and I try to appreciate, measure if it is worth or not, sometimes I come to value only by the actors involved in it, others for the title; This film that brings us today has all the ballots to be completely rejected for a movie buff Pro, but, as I am not I've willing to see it.I think that who is behind the film Judd Apatow, and the large group formed by Paul Rudd, Seth Rogen and Jonah Hill (excellent in "supersalidos"), if Adam Sadler and Santiago segura put his friends, that Seth Rogen and Apatow not can do the same? Accompanied by the famous Katherine Heigl ("Grey Anatomy") I loved the multitude of current references that appear on screen, from "Lost" to "Munich", through "Spiderman", "Monk", "Brokeback Mountain" or "Transmerica" and "Desperate housewives" series.In one of the journals of cinema that I often read monthly they referred to this film as tied in a new series of "Catholic tendencies" which demonstrate that, practise unprotected sex brings dire consequences, as well as the controversy over abortion and some thing rather than the movie, plays; If seen in this film that allegation is "beyond" look and if there were critics who saw in "300" a critique of Bush and the war in Iraq, or in the most recent "the strange that there are in my" an invitation to free will, here the only thing I see is a very Disney comedy (below invoice "Virgin at 40") and little else, ah! not I forget her excellent website.Excellent appearances in lightweight cameos of director Harold Ramis, and actress Joanna Kerns (famous in Spain for being the mother of "the problems grow", Maggie Seaver).On the negative plot, say the film lasts too (two hour and peak long reach tire), the party that takes place in Las Vegas Needless perhaps does not City casinos quite promotion with the myriad of Teleseryes taking place there? Its too feminist language in some moments, especially a phrase that says the sister of the main character related to the great self tender offer and which has in its context criticize = lose = change is perhaps my ex - was the same writer?Aside, once again, and this happy ending, is an attempt to moralize, and educate viewers on how great the experience of being parents (soon to my I have become to remove the desire).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3958

Ivan Villamel

Death Sentence

muchocine

A film that only highlights for the visually narrative work and implementation onstage by its director, with a bad script and an irregular narrative rhythm, not to speak extremely unbalanced

Yet recent premiere of their previous "silence from evil" (partially interesting but failed due to a bad script full of clichés of the genre) film, director James Wan returns to give us a work irregular, again failed, which shows once more their visual capabilities, but also a lack of criterion to choose their projects using a solvent and narrativamente fluid script.Prior to the aforementioned film, this Malaysian filmmaker had surprised with a great work as Saw that despite being accused by certain sectors of cheat (ignoring that the film itself same is a cheater art, the art of making us believe what does not exist), became a thriller of those who remain and maintain their effectiveness in their own right (although not reaching the masterful quality of the short film on which it was based)(one of the best ever seen by a server).In "Death Sentence", we have Nick Hume, an exemplary family guy, with a work of analyst and a perfect wife, two charming children, the oldest a young promise of hockey. His life is idyllic until the moment in which a unwelcome visit to a petrol station after collecting his eldest son, becomes the greatest tragedy that could imagine Nick, Brendan was assassinated by a group of gang members in a rite of passage by one of them. The responsible is identified, is a young man of 23 years and is brought to trial, but surprisingly Nick declares against the identification of the person responsible for the death of his son, with the intention of creating himself his own justice.The work of Wan after the cameras is the only notable aspect of this mediocre course, creating a sunset in effective scene (which not dramatic, unlike his argument) and that allows passing narration with much nerve and a visual style production, proving once again that their visual ability is beyond all shocking. This contributes to certain scenes of the film are extremely bright, especially that concerning a couple of moments Summit in its drama, the chase through the streets ending in the parking of cars, which carried the Group of gang members with the intention of ending Nick, and the final scene, in which the work after the Malaysian film camerasit reaches its absolute height with nervous and full of claw camera moves.One of the major problems of the film comes from a script (or as I say always, which has been on the transfer of the written script to the final result screen) too unbalanced, that does not help much to make believable certain attitudes, and even manages to create a narrative decompensation in the story. During the first 25 minutes we are witnessing the creation of the basis of the story through the family description, the murder and the trial, still all too abrupt and spot sick-superficial way, to then move on to the development of revenge, with a third final act where the history already falls into the empty more absolute. This decompensation makes does not believe a human drama from the murder of the son of Nick, nor to develop in-depth moral approach that may lead to the Act of revenge, becoming all too much effects and debtor of a cinema of the 1980s where revenge showed in his original political and reactionary, as Charles Bronson anyone and their "Yo soy la Justicia". Term which incidentally is used occasionally in a way quite erroneous, although not as well for the film that concerns us, the revenge something timeless and why not susceptible of being considered a reactionary attitude, unless behind this revenge justified certain political or ideological ideas alien to a fair and liberal vision of the things.In "Death sentence" the reactionary term lies in several of its passages, resulting especially revealing the idyllic vision of the family well-off compared to the life difficult for the Group of gang members, in a vision rather Manichean and distorted reality, a reactionary vision going. One can remember the initiation gang and his paroxista view of the world they belong.In addition, all the elements of the story have a whiff of moral hypocrisy in the message, striving to make a denunciation of violence as a creator of violence, but in turn using the gloating in violent and void scenes of an underground message.The work of actors can not overcome as manipulative script and only Kevin Bacon gives samples, rarely of a solvency that can't beat the hangover is a character described as manipulative manner, but that shows at least decent in their performance. Of the rest of the cast noted that meet each and every one of them to topics and archetypes already seen until exhaustion, and that does not help the credibility of the story.Unlike the excellent "The fire of vengeance" (where Tony Scott showed that you can delve into the soul of a character driven by the desire for revenge), James Wan can't overcome the platitudes of a genre so dramatic, and where even resorted to copying scenes or attitudes of infinitely superior films such as "Taxi Driver", the masterpiece on the descents into madness, in a final scene where a photocopy that final extraordinary.In short, a film that only highlights for the visually narrative work and start-up scene by its director, with a bad script and an irregular narrative rhythm, not to say extremely unbalanced, as well as a message of doubtful morality and who plays on the edge of the most reactionary attitude. Worrying the path undertaken by this promising director as he progresses his filmography.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1111

Natalia Eseverri

Banderas de nuestros padres

muchocine

You would recommend it without doubt to have the opportunity of seeing something different in war movies and also with an interesting message. It has become one of my films of the year and I hope more...

Watching movies like this, you really give account of why Clint Eastwood beats the battle directors as Martin Scorsese at the ceremony of the Oscar.No only because it manages to make a wonderful film in which both the script and the history, quality exceeds and even get to the work of the actors, very well done that issee overflowed by the plot and the mastery with which this film is directed. But because in addition, Clint Eastwood dares to deepen with something very difficult which is essential in life and American history as it is the pride and to criticize the search for heroes in something so cruel as it is the war.From the beginning, the intention of the film is shown through the testimonies of persons who took part in that famous photo of the lifting of the American flag at the battle of Iwo Jima, that for me is novel, that in most of the films release us a bland moral at the end is almost of joke and that in the majority of those times could have been saved. Then we can see details that we remember much the principle of saving private Ryan and being Mr Spielberg, one of the producers, I am not surprised that any advice or suggestion has shown in the film. But as things notable, especially stress the two main that I recommend this film: A magnificent address by Mr Eastwood, not only by its planes from camera, to which more risky. But to come accompanied by an extraordinary photography and a way of approaching a war film in a very different way to them that they were observing usually that is an original vision welcome. Increasingly, Mr Clint Eastwood demonstrates me its versatility when it comes to address issues of diverse nature and which is becoming, but it is already, in one of my favorite directors.And above all a script, which confirms that the relationship Paul Haggis - Clint Eastwood, is more productive and surprising. Through many flash-backs, us are telling the history of such frivolity, without losing even a second the pace of the plot and without losing the thread of what is happening to the Viewer. This, coupled with magnificent dialogue that manage to make you move from laughter to tears of one scene to another, succeed in getting the message of the film directly and without hesitation with scenes superflúas that lead nowhere.If I have to add some sticks, would be a poor music accompanying sometimes not to what is happening in some scenes and a somewhat poor use of the computer in some scenes of the battle which is quite noticeable that the scenes are not real.And already Finally, I her I would recommend without doubt to have the opportunity of seeing something different in war movies and also with an interesting message. It has become one of my films of the year and I hope you have more.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/822

Rafa Ferrer

El truco final (The Prestige)

muchocine

Although the film is a bit dodgier, the result not inferior in any way, perhaps, the only drawback that I see is a slump at the beginning of the second Act.

Second press pass to which I go, thanks to Warner, new film by Christopher Nolan, where we wonder with the picture that already showed us both "Insomnia" and "Batman Begins", where shares one of the protagonists, Christian Bale (tremendous in all its splendor), accompanied by Hugh Jackman, which little by little and after "Scoop" by Woody AllenIt seems that it begins to erase the traces of Wolverine who had left in the international movie buff scene, a Michael Caine (who also appeared in the new adventures of the bat man) in State of grace, and a Scarlett Johansson appearing of mere comparsa, to show off type, should talk about Bowie, but step why his character bores me, in addition to seem me little credible, as well as the short walk of Andy Serkis on screen.Film that leaves a good taste in the end, where one leaves the thoughtful film, and although the film is a bit dodgier, the result not inferior in any way, perhaps, the only downside I see is a slump at the beginning of the second Act, where the movie stops to launch dive until the end, go, almost like a roller coasterI can not forget me great setting and time, which leaves surprised more than one costume.In short, that we should expect eager to January 12, for its premiere.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3674

Oscar Martínez

Hitman

muchocine

Nor its choreography and its flat continuous slow-motion fail approaching John Woo more decadent, its history we sounds like a rehash, and Timothy Olyphant is still less credible in his role of villain in the jungle 4.0.

Hitman is the film adaptation of the popular game designed by the Danish company IO interactive, which has become already a series of several deliveries since its launch in the year 2000 of Hitman: codename 47.Dirigida by Frenchman Xavier Gens, director of the film presented in the Festival de Sitges Frontiere (s) past, and starring Timothy Olyphant, Dougray ScottRobert Knepper and Olga Kurylenko among others, the film tells the story of a Hitman known only as 47, whose mission is to end the purposes designated by the enigmatic grouping known as the Agency. During a mission in Russia, 47 will be victim of an ambush, becoming the target of the other Hitman.Como due to the shortage of scripts that is decimating the originality of Hollywood for a few years, adaptations of video games, comic books and remakes, have become a sort of goose that lays the golden eggs for the producers: movies like Resident Evil, Alone in the dark, Silent Hill, Tomb Raider or House of the dead flooded the screens more and more frequently, with quite mixed, although generally not too flattering results.Well, Hitman is a clear example of this.With a relamido script, performances of the 1980s telefilm, and alleged explicit violence that has made the film to reach United States with an inexplicable R, Hitman classification is not because it offers no novelty to the gender thing which nor expected, but is not even able to distract us fairly; Neither slowed cameras, enhanced levels, nor the constant gunfire accompanied by industrial music nor shoestring dresses of Olga Kurylenko are able to deliver us from a torpor that is beginning to be alarmingly tangible reality to the fifteen minutes of footage.It is not a server find tremendously convoluted plot, nor much less a few interpretations of Oscar, but fun and action fast-paced, with elaborate and stunning special effects, such and as other products current as the jungle 4.0 or even Shoot' em up Yes we offer.But Hitman not.Nor its choreography and its flat continuous slow-motion fail approaching John Woo more decadent, its history we sounds like déjà vu, or better said, rehash, and Timothy Olyphant is still less credible in his role of villain in the jungle 4.0; exempt from charisma, the killer 47 number parading by Russia and Turkey with its unmistakable bar code tattooed in the neck without being seen - to quote just one of several inconsistencies found along its plot-busting agents of the mafia, Interpol, or Russian intelligence, as well as other Hitman, so neat as bland wayoffering only a few exaggerated jets of hemoglobin.Quite tedious, to tell the truth.I give it a 4 out of 10.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1355

Yojimbo

Elizabethtown

muchocine

Give them my congratulations to all the players. They are great and you know them go excellently.

Dear C.C.Te I write this letter because I feel the need to express my fascination with your Elizabethtown in a more direct way than with an ordinary criticism.Since I saw the trailer for your movie I knew that it was going to be a new nostalgic gem. Between your great merits is convert a reality that sometimes exceeds US and us is totally strange, alienating and surreal in original situations that, at least to me, causing a very pleasant surprise.I was always fascinated by the way you have the Americans to "celebrate" the death. These chapels is not estilan. It must be our religious heritage that prevents us from seeing fondly and rejoice having shared moments with someone whom we wanted to. Toca here crying. Weep and lament. But I have always preferred to your style: already is sad to lose someone, so why not focus on a loving tribute and talk about good experiences with that person (if they exist)?But the death of your story is just an excuse. A great excuse to tell us that we take advantage of the time we have to enjoy it with who we want to. But not crazy. Not to the "almost famous". One could say that there talking of "burn life" to the maximum. It is not the same as the route by car from Orlando Bloom (tell him from me that here is quite well and who can not complain of projects that offer), with this wonderful company. You forgive you've put to flight attendant Kirsten. It is not to have any problem with them, just that at first believed me the rather than vital philosopher. Also forgive you some that another childish sentence and Declaration of intent ñoña in the mouth of the protagonists. There are pretty tacky, even disappointing moments for someone who knows how to write as well as you. But I have no doubt that you have done so on purpose. I do not I like, that is all.Along with Michael Mann I think ye are two current directors who have better musical sense in his films. I am not referring to original music, that also, but to make an outstanding selection of little-known songs and make them as yours, or so of the film that is not conceived these sequences without them.Your movie is a mirror. Many we have surreal situations throughout our lives: the same at a funeral you give someone a cigarette and then he as a sign of gratitude invites you to a beer and buy you another box of tobacco. Because your movie is truffled of such situations. And they are fun. Very funny. And best of all, you help the history and us to enjoy it.Give them my congratulations to all the players. They are great and you know them go excellently.That is why I write this letter. I think you're one of the best current writers and one of the most interesting and original of our time. I hope you are not with many problems for upcoming films. I do not think that Cruise you back at any time. It is that ye do good crumbs. And Tom always seemed to me a guy with good sense of smell to work with professionals.Cuidate much and hope we be surprised with your next film.Hugs, YojimboP.D. Someday I want to what makes Orlando at the end of the movie.And at the end of the road find me what he.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1465

Daniel Galindo

Pulse

muchocine

Repeats the same patterns of most horror films from United States: atmosphere of mystery, pretty girls who die later than his fellow - more ugly than them-, raids and little more.

Wes Craven, become factory, us back surplus story with repetitive elements in the classic titles of terror with and for young people.He repeated on the idea that the dead are among us, more of what some believe, and are no more savvy cabe in what regards to the use of new technologies. These beings of ultratumba already know tricks and we, as viewers, also, although at times, and that is the miracle of the film on the big screen, does not need that we create that tell us to spend a bit cramped in the armchair and I must admit it, entertaining. This is the only virtue of a title that repeats the same patterns of most horror films from United States: atmosphere of mystery, pretty girls who die later than his fellow - more ugly than them-, raids and little more.If you take it as something original? and believe me that it is difficult-, hooked his approach and his design to some extent surprised to go from the typical succession of deaths up to the panoramic view of an apocalyptic present. Criticism to our contemporary way of life is not subtle, but quite the contrary, but we already know that the excesses lead to nothing: footage wears a nervousness and an aesthetic that it just proving to be tired.Wes Craven, forgiveness, filmmaker Jim Sonzero is not modernized but that anchor in formulas that give good results. At the end everything becomes a new review of what have done others - and many of them better. The kitchenettes of terror adapts the action that takes place in the Japanese Kairo, of 2001, and garnished the story with usual young University born in the country of opportunities and typical of his productions scares, whether in the form of dreams or through cybernetic solutions quite catastrophic.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1098

Emilio Calvo de Mora

Hard candy

muchocine

This artifact of macabre entertainment not disappoint anyone with a Meridian interest by see where will new intellectual cinema, author

Films on pedophiles not abound: is a matter of thorny treatment that often little interest among the public. The merit of Hard candy is take an argument about moral anomaly that repugnant to who has well dressed the roof with traces of highly successful thriller halfway between the thesis of the cinema of trials and the Freudian drama.Throughout the film rests on two actors and barely out of the living room of a House does that everything is valued more strongly because has (also) the character amateur (in the sense of first-time) director David Slade, who comes from the video and leaves his clipero label in many plans and references to pop icons to the mtv (Goldfrapp). The film has an unpleasant time: solve it requires a point of effort, but that value plus then brings a reward, albeit in its resolution, in my opinion, imperfect, but acceptable. It was difficult to complete with verve, successfully, an argument so excellently done.Raw milk in abundance (the scene of the destesticulización, said crudely), is based on the story of a hard candy (Internet is named girls made pass for females to hold chats with adults), a cultured and malevolent, gut absolutely Machiavellian extremes to its particular vendetta against the slob photographer who seeks and which remains. A murder of a girl as a backdrop and a nutritional dose of dialogs to clarify / darken the reasons of amorality of paedophilia cover footage without the friendly viewer aware at any time that is attending a thriller as a cathedral, oddly at times a film of trials (the girl Hayley is the Prosecutor and the photographer Jeff is the pathetic accused) or a theatre play hardcore and edgy.Allowed to lead by byways then somewhat weak in credibility with the story of a bride who the photographer was, but anyway, isn't thing (of course) of uncovering the Pandora of this artifact of macabre entertainment that does not disappoint anyone with a Meridian interest by see where will new intellectual cinema, copyright (we can call it that).

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2671

José A. Peig

El caso Bourne

muchocine

Simply put: the visualization of Liman isn't at the height of a story that requires a greater psychological penetration. Although handled very well the tempos and the suspense, it is evident that there is a certain imbalance between form and substance, between what the content offered and the representation of the same.

The Bourne Identity is the excuse to delve into the mythology of the espionage film, the character played by Matt Damon here represents the paradox of the common man which is doomed to spiral of frames, mysteries, ins and outs of an apparatus of power serving openly and without that nobody can give explanations. Amnesia is an opportunity to break with the past. The Doug Liman film is a trip to the encounter with himself through the exorcism of the demons that lurk in the interior and abroad: the interiority of lost memories and doubt in a crucial moment that determines the last decision, and an exteriority populated by executing men of death as hidden automata in secrecy.The CIA is the omniscient quasi which seems to control it all, a myth deployed with remarkable scenery and characterization: solitary and armed men who expect the time to kill according to plans that only a few know. Ignorance of Bourne, daughter of amnesia, is a phenomenon parallel to the ignorance of the own ringleaders of the conspiracy, one of them, in the end, also become puppet who handled a macabre game.Alleged ambiguous tonality of the story part of a clever premise, but the visual execution and development do not exceed a routine procedure that ultimately results in a thriller of conventional scheme and situations subject to the clichés of the genre. Simply put: the visualization of Liman isn't at the height of a story that requires a greater psychological penetration. Although handled very well the tempos and the suspense, it is evident that there is a certain imbalance between form and substance, between what the content offered and the representation of the same.Some action scenes wield an unnecessary dramatic, sometimes the story becomes too predictable, when not inane because of the inability of the Narrator to offset the iterative scheme narration (set the reader as throughout the film just happens much more than always the same: búsqueda-desencuentro - search-misunderstanding-búsqueda-desencuentro.) with a progressive depth and penetration in the psychological drama.However, we are dealing with a very decent, entertaining film, it has a couple of very well filmed action scenes and, anyway, you can not disappoint fans of the genre, especially for those nostalgic for those setenteras movies about espionage in the cold war. Circumscribed the scope of cinema as art (the only area that interests us here), just a too warm, although correct and entertaining film, and when you encounter the dreaded cliches so abundant in a specific genre like this, do it with some dignity.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2075

Francisco Bellón

Piratas del Caribe: En el Fin del Mundo

muchocine

Despite its flaws, Pirates of the Caribbean: in the end of the world is an acceptable adventure film, which entertains more that bored, and it will delight fans of this popular series.

The day in which unveiled one of the most anticipated outcomes of recent times has finally come. No, we are not referring to who will be the next champion of League, but the outcome of one of the most blockbuster trilogies of all time, Pirates of the Caribbean. Do the most famous Buccaneers of the contemporary cinema landed finally on the Bank of Spanish theaters to offer us what will be their last adventure? or not? This third adventure begins where stayed the previous one, with the death of Jack Sparrow and the Dutch Errante in the hands of the East India Company. Captain Barbossa (Geoffrey Rush), Will Turner (Orlando Bloom) and Elizabeth Swann (Keira Knightley) depart until the end of the world to rescue the intrepid Jack Sparrow (Johnny Depp) of the Kingdom of Davy Jones (Bill Nighy). With the help of Jack Sparrow, pirates around the world can deal with Lord Cutler Becker (Tom Hollander) and dreaded the Dutch Errante. First and foremost, it must be said that Pirates of the Caribbean: in the end of the world is more in line with the first delivery of the second (hodgepodge of biblical proportions), which is very welcome. This film has a more leisurely pace, there are fewer visual maremagnum and the script and the characters are more polished on the chest of the dead man. But not pears at del olmo, we may ask that the freshness and innovation of the original film (and which it should not have done, at least in the artistic sense) are conspicuous by their absence. To show us the script given new depth, Gore Verbinski gives us a tape that it touches three hours, which leads to moments of sovereign boredom among the respectable, especially in its central part. In history there are many twists and turns of the screw forced and unnecessary plot loopholes and pseudo-dramáticos moments that border the ludicrous. Not to mention some really ridiculous and infumables sequences of its last minute, starting with their own outcome. To speak of the end, a notice to Mariners: after the closing credits, there is a "surprise scene", if there are any brave hold until then. The technical section is very well covered, although still screeching the crew of the Dutch Errante, and the latest is worthy of praise, technically speaking. From here, we welcome the decision to restore the character of Barbossa, which gives us the opportunity to delight us with the great Geoffrey Rush and their confrontations with the no less brilliant Johnny Depp. Orlando Bloom is as boring as always, while Keira Knightley meets perfectly to take forward with total dignity increasingly impaired and less graceful character (both interpretative and physically). Despite its numerous and important judgments, Pirates of the Caribbean: in the end of the world is an acceptable adventure film, which entertains more that bored, and it will delight fans of this popular series.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4245

Plissken

This is England

muchocine

Shane Meadows is a film small and sad in the background, but told with rhythm and color, especially in the first half.

The eighties. That decade that, fortunately, leave of glorificada within a couple of years (played 1990s grunge and the makinote will be fun), gave to much in all senses. And in the bad sense, gave rise to the radicals claimed national symbols to revive old ghosts of hatred and xenophobia throughout Europe. Also gave rise to the new romantics, but that's another story. 'This Is England', the award-winning film of Shane Meadows, the novel is set in the coastal England and lower-class of 1983, stuck in the Middle thanks to its unwavering leader, Margaret Thatcher's Falklands war. Shaun, a boy of 12 years who had just lost his father in the war, leads can be orphaned and poor. And one day, finds a group of skins that accept you as more than one group. Its entry matches the back of Combo, one of the more radical members of the group, which will try to drag them to the darker side of the movement. Shaun must choose between staying with their new friends or honor the patriotic values for which his father died.Shane Meadows is a film small and sad in the background, but told with rhythm and color, especially in the first half. This helps that from minute one, the star of the function is the young protagonist, Thomas Turgoose, which eats the screen to bits next to who you are, and that gives the story a tremendous power. Beside, the endearing 'Snatch', Stephen Graham, Tommy is great in the role of the violent Combo, and a good handful of unknown young give life with much success to this peculiar gang of skinheads.Other aspects to be highlighted are the cuidadísimas photography and ambience, that as soon as we put fully at that time as heterodox (if not tacky) as we move to the more sordid part of the life of Shaun. The inclusion of hits of the time as the mythical 'Come on Eileen' of Dexy´s Midnight Runners or the "Tainted Love" soft Cell contrasts with the intimate music that accompanies the more solitary moments of the Shaun small or the selection of music ska and soul these skinheads hear in their small revelries. Because one of the keys that handles Shane Meadows in which we identify with such extreme characters is different which was the skin movement in the early 1980s, before characters like Combo become it cannon fodder for their nationalist Crusades.On the negative side, outline the short route which has the history itself; When Shaun process could understand months, or even years, to travel from one end to another of the ideology skin, the feeling that remains at the end of the film is that the protagonist has spent a few days with a group of people and then gone. Gives the impression that time required to make sense of the evolution of the characters, or what is the same, this evolution is somewhat hasty way. Against the same is relapse in some cliché of the genre.Moreover, a remarkable example of how having a small history of neighborhood and to reach any audience. They call it universality, and it is a pending issue here. But of course, this is Spain. A 7.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3822

Carlos Giacomelli Puig

Resident Evil Extincion

muchocine

It matters little that the script is not Oscar, or actors sank without remission. You are looking for is fun, and that is neither more nor less what offers "Resident Evil: extinction"

Mila Jovovich gets involved again in the skin of Alice in the third part of "Resident Evil", which presents an apocalyptic world in which the undead campan at ease and that the few survivors must tread with very careful to keep alive. Accompany the cast the spectacular Ali Larter (Nikki in "Heroes"), Oded Fehr, and Mike Epps, and directs the Russell Mulcahy.Sin semidesconocido doubt the ship insignia of the adaptations of video games to the big screen, the "Resident Evil" series has always differentiated from the rest by having that drive and gripper which both missing productions such as "Alone in the Dark", "House of the Dead", or "Silent Hill". And above all, great virtue, especially in the first part, is that it entertains like few, regardless of the quality of the final result.Because if "Resident Evil" is a more than correct film of horror and action, part two, "Apocalypse", left something to be desired becoming nonsense seemed not to know what string cling, lurching between action scenes precitipitadas and dramatic moments of non-existent consistency.Fortunately, the third is much more compensated, and while the introduction of fantastic and supernatural elements subtract you the little credibility that he had the character and therefore the argument in general, the script is much more focused on a dynamic and fast-paced, story which just leaves one minute pause Meanwhile shot and fight live against zombies. And references. Because a new constant for this occasion are clear references to other films of the genre. Will not be at all difficult to recognize almost kidnapping sequences "The hills have eyes", "Birds", "Jurassic Park", and especially to "The day of the dead" by Romero, which until may feel insulted to see how bebe Paul W.S. Anderson (writer of the trilogy and director as well as the first) of their ideas.In another order of things, for this occasion the film style changes, breaks with the characteristic precocious and dark lighting of the previous two installments, which were situated inside the complex first Umbrella and a destroyed city later. Now it's been five years, the land is completely dominated by an infinite number of undead, and large cities like Las Vegas had been overdue and buried by the sands of the desert. For this reason, the film is (apparently) ugly and dirty, empolvada and warm, placing nearly all of the action in full light of day. But that no one be fooled, because everything is calculated to the millimetre: only in this way can be enjoyed throughout his scenes as the cuervos-zombie attack on the convoy of the protagonists, or scenarios as the impressive desert covering Las Vegas. And why not, the choreography so spectacular that it is composed Jovovich to eliminate his enemies.Because ultimately that is the major asset on which it counts Mulcahy film, the spectacular constant action scenes throughout the film. As it is the case with this kind of movies, it matters little that the script is not Oscar, actors sank without remission, or that the address is not precisely Scorsese. You are looking for is fun, and that is no less than what gives "Resident Evil: extinction". That Yes, to starting the end credits, one already is has almost completely forgotten what you have just seen.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1604

Emilio Calvo de Mora

El grito 2

muchocine

Pass through box, stop their euros, if they have nothing to do. If they have, do so. Although it does cost more. Money is not the most important thing in life.

ITodo is becoming too confusing. One believes that he is in a world and then it is another. It opens a door to the waiting to find a garden and what he sees is a slaughterhouse. Close your eyes and search with the imagination a beach with shells and children playing with the waves and that sees is a forest where campan to their wide elves and witches, perhaps a Catholic fundamentalist or a hooligan with mild artistic inclinations. One film is going to spend a good time and get hurt, enpantanado in almost always dark thoughts about the convenience not to return ever again or use more rigorous selective criteria. It weighs even the possibility of not returning to stepping on a film and leave the eyes on home TV. Hence it is always possible to give to the stop and change the disk. Or put any. Reading is a first-rate entertainment. There are excellent books on the market. I have been a voracious reader and leo still with fury when time allows me to. Ah Charles Dickens. Ah Paul Auster. Ah Borges. Ah Gamoneda. If the book thing not strain, is the music. Take one a cd from the shelf, drops in the favorite armchair and closes his eyes. Bill Evans piano can fill all the expectations of happiness that a human being sought. Or some melodies by Billy Joel. Or the symphonic rock of the Genesis of the first time. If the gentle reader still has doubts about how to occupy their time, you can exit to the street. Not everything is cinema, books and CDs, although that can fill very demanding appetites. There are still friends with those who take awhile and discuss the divine and the human with a good bourbon in a winter terrace. Or simply take a walk, be carried away by the wind while the afternoon deposed its rigors and night looks between the roofs of back home. In the end. Life can be wonderful, as says a television announcer of phonetic bombast and poor patch cords as a pariah in the reception of the Rockefeller Center.Y all this came in connection with the film, I remember.It is that last night I saw the cry 2. And left thoughtful, as the gentle reader warns, fatigando pros and cons, being resolved in my minds (I have one, Yes, Mr) over whether to forget this event or incorporate it into the thick list of awkward moments that are entailed the passage of days. I don't know what to do yet. I do not know how to proceed my almost always straight thinking. The best positions to be honest, is not the thing for both. Infumables jumbles of lower moral caladura and this one has seen (what they want to tell you) has to some incombustible instantly. Or maybe a couple or three. Outside this bonanza, the film is a chestnut of considerable size that is undermining our patience until the eyes begin to bite us and the brain (which is wise, dammit) asks loudly (more crying) abandon the room and paseemos by the avenues, outdoors, watching cars, families going and coming through the parks.My friend j. warns me of these excesses mine: Emilio, take care of yourself. Don't go to fall ill. It is very easy (concluded) start with the cry 2 and then swallow entire Filmography of Andres Pajaros and Fernando Esteso, although had tits to galore.And once got in these conaza of the rising sun then it is very difficult to return to Stanley Kubrick or Alfred Hitchcock, that you both liked. So bad is it? Because I am not clear whether the adjective "bad" is entirely appropriate. It is strange. It is a remake of a sequel. It is a gimmick. It is, agree, a package of popcorn a kilometer in height which is eaten in one sitting and then you have left on an empty stomach, as if nothing had entered.By delve into my fault, I admit that I saw the first and me angry not in excess. This second reached me deeper. The curse of the House has come out of the screen and I traded. I'm inoculated. The virus has invaded my critical capacity. This review will end up being benevolent.IILS Japanese cinema is giving us more and more joy. After the incomensurables Dark Water or Pulse (sober inspiration Japan) has fallen on our screens the cry 2. If still has not come to the film, stop what you are doing. Go. To run. Row seven. Eight also. There is excitement and fear in abundance. Requested that the producers should seek another House soon (the same better you if they change the furniture) and launched for Christmas scream 3. And if three cries do not satisfy their yearning for spectral infants in damn houses, go to the nearest video store and rent the Japanese originals. Or buy them. There will be a pack. Tapes mothers tend to be more raw but no less shocking. How beautiful is the cinema. How happy I am today.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/598

Jesus Lens

El laberinto del fauno

muchocine

A free movie, which wasted imagination, that can be enjoyed in every one of their frames and fails to be a teacher only because lacks it a point of emotion to finish snatch to the Viewer.

We must be very well placed balls to imagine, write, draw and shoot a film as "El laberinto del fauno", that cruel, bloody and sinister reality gives the hand with the most boundless, imaginative and unbridled fantasy. In addition, should be much genius and great talent for mixing the Post Spanish Civil War, the maquis and the Francoist repression with a fairy tale. and leave with good of the challenge.Guillermo del Toro is a prolific, protean and Homeric, equipped with an unsurpassed ability to imaginative and visionary, flying free, filmed what pleases and almost always does it masterfully. From "Cronos", wonderful making it the day of the myth of the vampire and the struggle for immortality, until this "Laberinto del fauno", del Toro has left his personal imprint on so intimate as "The Devil's backbone" projects or so supposedly commercial as "Hellboy" or "Blade" products. "And all these movies end up leaving a nice and delicious aftertaste in the Viewer.""El laberinto del fauno" is a fantastic tour de force that, since his sonorous and evocative title, leaves no one indifferent. A car of the Phalanx progresses, barely, by a bad country road. A mother tells her daughter that you read too many books fairy. When the car arrives at its destination and the girl he meets which is going to be his putative father. all of us understand that his only refuge will be, precisely, in this world of fantasy that will open to its around. Because the masterfully played by the always genial character Sergi López is a piece of bastard of a piece, as long we saw not on a cinema screen. A bastard who knows that he is, that enjoy being so and have not the slightest remorse for being. The counterpoint, paradoxically, is that threatening fantasy world in which, however, the little protagonist can find more warmth than the existing between men.Baroque and, at times, bizarre, the oneiric universe which introduces the girl will have consequences in the real world which flees. "So, through the tests under the endearing Faun, small"achieved"that knife that will be critical to Mercedes, will learn how to escape from the villain of the piece and, with their innocence and determination, will bring a ray of hope to make the real world a little, only a little better.""El laberinto del Fauno" is a free film, which wasted imagination, that can be enjoyed in every one of their frames and that fails to be a teacher only because lacks it a point of emotion to finish snatch the viewer and make that tears in the stalls spilling. Although well thought of having it done as well, for sure it had accused of del Toro's sentimental and dramatic. In any case, we have an outstanding movie that confirms that, when there is genius, personality and talent, everything else, including budget, it is secondary.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1608

Rafa Ferrer

Babel

muchocine

New movie Alejandro González Iñárritu Puzzle, this time less mixed than "21 grams" and more of the style of his first tape "Amores Perros", with a series of frames, some collected by hairs, seeking, through harsh images, attract and plotted the Viewer.

New movie Alejandro González Iñárritu Puzzle, this time less mixed than "21 grams" and more of the style of his first tape "Amores Perros", with a series of frames, some collected by hairs, seeking, through harsh images, attract and plotted the Viewer.Honestly the movie found me bella on your Bill, well constructed, but very boring, with few moments coming to sink in the retina of the Viewer, on the other hand, both Pitt, like Blanchett, as the rest of the actors including Gael García Bernal and Elle Fanning (Dakota little sister), are normal, palatable and following his line of typical performance.Of all the stories (linked by a link to each one more jam), I'll perhaps stick with Japan and Morocco, both perhaps the most complicated and hard, a separation of cultures and because of his harsh at times, but not I have never reached shudder in the armchair.Regard to the soundtrack of Gustavo Santaolalla, which has won an Oscar, again I hear the everlasting Melody with guitar, I perhaps stayed with the collaboration of Ruichi Sakamoto, sometimes enlarging a Score, which is tiny.In short, a film that has been given so much hype that it is impossible to be impartial with her.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1138

Alberto Concepción

El truco final (The Prestige)

muchocine

The Prestige is a film that entertains, and since it is designed as such, I think that it does not deserve more trial than intended. Meets and, note, its objective.

If we make a comparison between the film and the magic, we could get many parecidos.y of course, differences. 'The Prestige' is film with magic, and trick. A good story, which never leaves aside the characters and giving you everything what is intended to: Entertainment.The problem is that it seems that from the outset, they are telling us that we we have this trick. A trick, everything must be said, that seems rather a succession of ellos.pero that is relatively easy to realize in the course of the film. And if not? Better, you will most enjoy the tape.Two London magicians of the 19th century, following the tragic death of the wife of one of them, begin a struggle to put an end to the career (and life) of the other. Perhaps simple argument for some, but with the presentation Nolan made the film, and thanks to its protagonists (great deal), makes the film more than interesting, to the point of being highly recommended, that Yes, to a mere enjoyment of the 'magical' film.A remarkable aspect of this last film of Director Christopher Nolan is its continued interest because the Viewer is attentive to the screen. As a magic trick, Yes. And although at the beginning the pace may be somewhat slow, and in fact, it is possible that you on some footage, the expectation increases thanks to a few good shots of effect by the director, the script, the excellent ambiance and the quality of the performances: Hugh Jackman and Christian Bale are the height, as well as Michael Caine (as always)though but it is true that the role of Scarlett Johansson is not as important as for his showcasing (or precisely it was only to show it off?).The Prestige is a film that entertains, and since it is designed as such, I think that it does not deserve more trial than intended. Meets and, note, its objective.

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1418

Emilio Calvo de Mora

El crepúsculo de los dioses

muchocine

One of the two or three favorite movies of this chronicler and more acidic look that the film has written about himself. Needed revision to greater joy of the soul. Movie fan jewel. Finally.... superb sample of human genius

1. "Is still wonderful, isn't it?"And without dialogues! "The history of Sunset Boulevard (being the title here tax superb, the twilight of the gods, the English original is masterful) is narrated by a dead that we see in the first frames floating in a historiated pool of a Hollywood mansion." Joe Gillis (William Holden) is the voice that tells their own death or the story of a writer of second row, eaten by debts, which accidentally takes refuge in the mansion of a silent film diva, insane, fueled by nostalgia and psychotic in her decadent soledad (Gloria Swanson).The crepíusculo of the gods is a treasure for the devoted collector of images of the seventh art. To Scarlett O'Hara swearing with a handful of Earth in the hands against the ochre horizon, vowing that not olverá to go hungry or the Rick of Casablanca with the French inspector consenting to the beginning of a great friendship while a plane part in the fog, join Norman Desmond (immortal Swanson, incredible, prodigious) down the staircase to be arrested by the police between flashes and lights. As a diva in a film festival.Have seen before a travelling to remove his hat (Billy Wilder was always one): a caravan of police cars approaching the mansion with that voice in off telling: "Yes, this is Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, California." They are around five in the morning. It is the homicide Brigade, supplemented by detectives and journalists. They have reported a murder in one of these huge houses of the 10,000 Apple. You can read in the editions of the night, they will tell you on the radio and see on television because an old star is involved, a major star. ". The voice stops before his corpse in the pool. Never before the film had dared to tell us the end with both explicit harshness: the protagonist is the muerto.2. "We needed no dialogues". We had faces! "Wilder had, in the words of William Holden, blades razor in the brain." They just agreed to get the film, who was born silenced for a short and was recorded in secret. The director misled Meyer, the Almighty producer of the underground Hollywood glamour, telling her that it was another, and with another argument, which was being filmed. The reason comes from the nature of the film and its carnalmente homicidal purpose transgreosra, canibal almost. It chronicled the decline of the silent film era and counter-insurgency in acid and bloody way in the ways of Hollywood, your pathetic life codes and the atrophication of the film industry, who preferred not to risk for the sake of political correctness and to the liking of the public never too demanding.The screenplay by Wilder and Charles Brackett perverted the classical structure of film writing. Perhaps for the first time in a very forceful way. It is not only the fact is narrated by who already know who has died but also by the desire to speak of the film within the film and talk with acrimony, harshly, without mincing words in the language. This metalinguistic added formidably later explicitly by the Coens in Barton Fink is reinforced with the successful inclusion of silent film heavyweights, loans generous to give more verismo as cash. It is Erich Von Stroheim (legendary German director of the greed, 1.927 tape) and Cecil B. de Mille (adoptive father of this first-time film coming out of the laboratory for flood screens, which here makes himself, how not, with its natural and curious mode of dress, boots high and gestures of a safari Hunter).Seasoned of fatalism, the script is pure film noir or film black lightened with a Greek drama of much height, although Wilder lighten some topics of one and another and becomes convinced that maybe a very lewd portrait of Hollywood, which he knew well by his screenwriter stage, could not agree that the film had the blessing of the heads.His daring is to slap the Hollywood classic, aristocratic and fetén and not arredra Wilder in pull repertoire also classic and aristrocrático and so are witnessing an amazing letters starting with Buster Keaton's head of cards or the already mentioned Von Stroheim or De Mille. The sordidness in the narrated or continuous recourse of the flashback, a novelty in the usual way of telling things in the film then give the film an artistic tone: as if Wilder had noticed that that material in your hands could revolutionize the history of the Cine.No there is nothing rough in the relationship of norm and Joe: the splendor of the divahis belief in that bright yet late and the failure of the screenwriter (another nod to the mediocrity of the mercenary screenwriter for the worst films of the own subway at the time) do not never acquire a solid, autonomous entity. Standard is a victim of technology (then the video kill the radio star, but that's another story) and are detained in a mansion: it binds to the bovine old with his famous films, it embadurna with all the oils in the world. Cosmetics, makeup, informs us of the true condition of Norma Desmond: it is not the film, it is not the abandonment of the noise of the flashes and the claquetas, is the time, the pressing, that is the real cause of his insanity. The years have devastated his sanity. Lives with whom her first husband and now it's the perfect, cynical and efficient Butler to drunkenness. The arrival of Joe, representing the outside world uncovers his eagerness to asleep by greening fugal fame, the noise of the flashes and the claquetas, time regained such vez.3. "Still I am large;!" "is the film that has made small!"The twilight of the gods, together perhaps to Citizen Kane, is the film has given rise to more bibliography. Wilder wanted Greta Garbo, but already withdrawn, refused the offer. Mary Pickford, another silent glory, demanded more of the account. I wanted a biopic to use and a film about the twilight of an archetype. Mae West, that AVID of male lagartona, alleged that she was younger than Norma Desmond in the script. Gloria Swanson, pushed by George Cukor, was chosen. The transition from silent to sound took it badly and retired to live succulent rents appearing in theatre, radio, or the new Queen, television. For Gillis, before Holden, Montgomery Clift, who argued that his fans, Legion, not paraded him forgive you flirtease on screen with a wrinkled grotesque. Fred MacMurray, liked by Wilder, was rejected by Meyer. Gene Kelly was not a recognizable style in his vertigionosa career film. William Holden was not considered by the director a competent actor. Even in a journal he attacked frontally by saying it was a mediocre actor of serie B, but it ended up accepting and surrendered to her superb performance. But among all, is Gloria Swanson that gives dramatic support to the film: which keeps intact, who has recorded his face stretched, his gestures of exquisite loca, glamour and pathos, the sublime madness and forgotten love in our memory of cinema. Bette Davis would have been a fantastic Norma Desmond, said I. The Repertoire of gestural nuances of the Swanson is the usual inventory of all those actresses of the silent, who said with a grimace which then needed two verbs and adjectives nine. Its perfect parade of ICT has become the history of the cine.4. "Fuck you" A curiosity: the twilight of the gods had a private pass prior to their distribution. It is natural. Louis B. Mayer, the boss of the underground, approached Wilder and he snapped: "you, bastard bastard, has brought to the film industry." Her has been dragged through the mud. It has bitten the hand that made him someone and also gave him to eat. Should be alquitranar him, fledging him and throw the country. "." Wilder replied only: "Fuck you".Another: The first idea of Wilder was to make the film begin with the body of Joe Gillis in the mortuary, under the sheet. talking about. He was convinced by Buckett, his alter-ego in the writing, that that was going to make that everything was taken to chacota.Addenda or PostScript, or what was missing: only by the breathtaking fall of Gloria Swanson by the staircase when you are going to be stopped is worth the penalty the film. This image lingers in the memory of this writer as the blue sky or the Moon cut in the roof of my house. Above, we know that he has killed perhaps so modified the lights the benefit and the flashes of journalists parpadeen as bullets. I read that all the reporters of that scene were not actors but real reporters. And then there is the formidable dead, the talkative body, giving an acid rebound in healthy irony, clean rawness in its Parliament.In year 2,230, the twilight of the gods will be the film was at 1,950 and which has been this evening when I had the absolute pleasure of reverse her. And will...

archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3571

Jesus Lens

Leones por Corderos

muchocine

While guys like Michael Winterbotton filmed excellent films, a director of the old guard, paste failed shots with wet gunpowder, when it has all the resources and means to make good cinema of truth.

Had just passed away ten or fifteen minutes of the film when Sacai whispered me that we had to have seen prior to its consideration of philosophy, in which he had played lecture about whether we could be happy without policy. Because the more recent film that healthy and Ruddy liberalote is Robert Redford goes that precisely, how important is policy and nefarious is the moral and intellectual attrition are doing our youth of today. The film, as if it were an episode of "24", happens virtually in real time. An hour and a half in the life of a handful of people who apparently do not have nothing do with one another, but whose stories are causally linked through a structure very much in the style of González Iñárritu. But the similarities between "Babel" and these "Lions for Lambs" end up there, in the structural will. Because the Redford film lacks the poetic breath and the ability of the film of the Mexican suggestion, to become a some left-wing discourse as moderate as well-meaning. and more exciting, the truth.The three stages of the film, the war is inconsistent; the academic is, at times, to sonrojante and only the relationship of attraction/fascination/repulsion is established between the promising right-wing politician and veteran left-wing journalist played by Meryl Streep, Tom Cruise offers some appeal. Only in his interview/conversation there is some tension and excitement in a soft and listened, film flat, a frustrating no-brainer. War sequence is already taken so narrowly that virtually spare in its entirety. It does not cause anguish, emotion or penalty. Even though the missing soldiers are two good and idealistic boys, war history is irrelevant, especially, to put it in relation to the conversation that the professorial and discursive Redford keeps his he/she student.A film of thesis, without force or hook, that it seems destined for a confused students and that have most mordant, could serve, for example, that the famous judge of minors from Granada, Emilio Calatayud, used her in encouraging troubled youth to straighten out his life and leave an incapacitating that it does not lead to anything good.It is a pity that, while guys like Michael Winterbotton filmed excellent films such as "Road to Guantanamo" or "Untamed heart", a director of the old guard, usually committed with the American militant left, hitting failed shots with wet gunpowder, when it has all the resources and means to make good cinema of truth. And it is that with good intentions is full hell.