Datasets:

Unnamed: 0
int64
0
3.88k
id
stringlengths
44
47
autor
stringclasses
181 values
title
stringlengths
2
71
rank
int64
1
5
maxRank
int64
5
5
source
stringclasses
1 value
summary
stringlengths
9
396
body
stringlengths
352
24.4k
3,200
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2342
Rafa Ferrer
Maderos 091
2
5
muchocine
In the purest style "Torrent" in the film we can see, among others Danny DeVitto (producer of the original series) and The Rock, in a very interesting role. One of those tapes that you can always claim to have not seen.
I know that this is the typical tape around the world will deny seeing this film which one always just eludes and in the unlikely event that does it, will blamed alcohol or various substances, psychotropic, its visonado, is certainly the tape ideal to see with friends at home (in a State of drunkenness) and so be able to enjoy their hilarious situations, and that a sequence including my beloved "generally canon" (although its context is insane).Reading the argument one can think that we we have a tape of action, seen your poster you think in a comedy in the purest style "mad Academy of police." nothing further from both perspectives, this Mockumentary is a Comedy Central series "episode on the big screen" (famous among other things for the mythical "South park"), "Reno 911" series that parodies the famous "Cops" which for a time also aired on Spain. to the purest style "Torrent" in the movie can see, including Danny DeVitto (producer of the original series) and The Rock, in a very interesting role.Finally, along with Borat, one of those tapes that you can always claim to have not seen.
3,201
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1548
Emilio Calvo de Mora
La vida abismal
2
5
muchocine
Vacuous and relamido I contrived that not enough to entertain, although I get an interest in seeing how everything ends, it is something. The abyss was in the armchair.
Ventura Pons has seemed always a literary director and not because it is left to ruin a film by an excess of spoken prose but imagine there was a novel under the film and, in the majority of cases (I think now of Quim Monzó, a prodigious writer), a good novel. Not this is unfortunately the case. Pons pulls a work of Ferran Torrent which has crápulas of night the initiation of a young man in the environments. Then there are whores, people rogue and evil live. Or maybe this is the life and the rest are fringes, appendices, fillings. The virginal young opens this perverse catechism and squeezes it with willingness to learn in a short time what life given in years. This is the experience. Abysmal life disappointed by one more inconvenient mise en scene, which is not credible, that warns chapucera for more than the argument dazzles in loose scenes (perhaps the principle). I have not seen Oscar Jaenada making shrimp, but here he's troubled, confused, despistado, depressed, as the song of Hilario Camacho. He looks not taste and character is as wishing that the film ends. Chinese (so called) is back much, but the actor that gets us on screen not explicit: stays in an impertinent gestures and a face with intentions, although deadpan.Characters living to the limit not fill a movie by far that has what one means that there will be telling the story that we suspect we're going to have, but all agree to precarity when asked what passion (sickly if you want when items that recount are large and require big words or a desire to also great not ruin everything for not taking care of details). Comes now to the memory the (pathetic) scene of the Declaration of love with the French girl. If they put a trailer and give those scenes, does one film?Ventura Pons made the why of things (1993) and Anita noi loses the train (2000). Look for the gentle reader in some video store any one of them or both and you will see that there are ex officio and ways. The first love. Here there is no enchantment, nowhere near.
3,202
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2811
Kiko de España
Cabeza de muerte
2
5
muchocine
With a bit of Asian horror (shadows walking frame to frame, glups!) and a lot of cool modernism tries to look like so many things that it ends up being a complete mess. The mushrooms and the tension does not combine well...
Alexandre Ajá, Rob Zombie, Adam Green (Hatchet) or Zach Snyder are directors with talent. Paddy Breathnach is a director without too much talent who has shot a movie that kids are scared to the brutal volume of "scares".Do with a bit of Asian horror (shadows walking frame to frame, glups!) and a lot of cool modernism tries to look like to so many things that it ends up being a complete mess: two pairs of Yankees and a girl alone that he has his churri in Ireland travel there for? eat mushrooms. It might accuse such an argument be a supine stupidity, but Eli Roth used it in Hostel and worked, because that if I think. Who wants not to go to Holland with colleagues to quit a bit of good grifa? I know people that gets to the a by mushrooms, have never caught a plane to such bullshit.Well, the fact is the grandson of John Huston explains them that there are a few mushrooms debutis, a cursed orphanage, ghosts and mushrooms that should not never eat: cause death almost fixed. If you survive the mushrooms side effects are "spectacular": ability to communicate with the dead (does?), aggressive and uncontrollable force, the power to change shape (do?) and finally, but not least, the ability to see the future.Some more there, but we are sure that it destripa a movie that lacks interest by very cool whatever the dossier that we have given in the pass. So does not help that the genus is respected, because Jason had already been a sack in the chola before putting the mask, oafish native those we recently saw in Calvary and the rest? well, you could say that it is a movie about how a blonde girl gets dirty in the forest. There more plagiarism, but become spoiler tell you that ends up as? quiet, kidding.
3,203
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1597
Emilio Calvo de Mora
Miss Potter
2
5
muchocine
Miss Potter is a sobrevitaminado of sugar candy: an unbearable exercise of simpering emotional ombliguismo. Like putting the language in a jar of jam. And then put it again...
I agree with a friend that put me on notice when he knew my intention to see this film. He came to say that the poster was sweet as a lenguetazo to a jar of jam. He has a habit that continues to strictly: be carried away by the most basic impression, the primary. In this case, not liked at all the advertising Assembly or not (I was, in part, with him) the cover. Then I warned with a more effective strength: you'll see a ñoña film. That adjective disarmed me, but I desatendí my misgivings and me colé in viewing of the subject. It would have been better heed of friendship. The friends are a treasure, as a song it says. This, a couple of them.Miss Potter is a sobrevitaminado of sugar candy: an unbearable exercise of simpering emotional ombliguismo. Da that are just there to avoid the debacle two recent fuste actors such as Ewan McGregor and Renée Zellweger. The precipitate film is inevitable because the pastelón is so overwhelmed magic, rabbits and noble sentiments which cloying with two or three minutes of exposure. The such Beatrix Potter, Rowling in early 20th century, had to be an entreñable Lady, very literary foundations, but the film overwhelms, disturbs, produces the opposite of what you search, we install in some comfortable position of distance. Not just never one to enter at all while the actors (the three main, McGregor, Zellweger and Emily Watson) es´tén frankly well.So nice and well done everything to scale.
3,204
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3292
Juan Fondevila
El viaje de Chihiro
5
5
muchocine
I'm glad that there are still people like Miyazaki without useless sensiblerías and with fair doses of love and pain dares to tell a story out of regular flows of horror and tragedy without sense of many films.
Lately it is difficult that surprised us books, film or art. It seems that the only way to innovate is to be increasingly hard in the arguments and that only you can say new things from the deep pain and stories instances of rape, concentration camps, repressive dictatorships, incest, Sexualities fustradas and other various horrors of humanity. Above all that is necessary to esribir if someone needs to do so, because literature has no limits or restrictions and provide intense looks on humans, but let us not forget that art and the lbros have been distinguished by its diversity and capacity for expression of different forms of thinking of the people and the immense tapestry of colors of the world. Apart from horror there are compassion, will, friendship and imagination. Throughout history have been created worlds like Middle-Earth and extraordinary adventures such as the of the history forever which, without being real, have taught us much more than some wonderful novels less fanciful in facing life in this complex world.For this reason, the other day when I saw spirited away happened to me two things. The first teaching is that the manga, cartoons, can bring to art and cinema treasures if they are well used. We must look out everything above topics, because perhaps it brought me more this film that certain books of brainy intellectuals. The second was the recovery of hope that there is still people who invents and makes art with its weapons, using imagination and the creation of new worlds. Seeing it reminded me of certain stages of my childhood and those nights eternal asking me was the ginger cake that took the Cinco.Me am glad that there are still people like Hayao Miyazaki without useless sensiblerías and with fair doses of love and pain dares to tell a story out of regular flows of horror and tragedy without sense of many filmsbooks and modern art. I will not tell anything about the plot of the movie. The living room of your House, overstuffed sofa, a television and a dvd you will give many more answers than I am about it. Happy holidays!
3,205
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4251
Heitor Pan
La Escafandra y la Mariposa
3
5
muchocine
Schnabel manages to create a bright, honest, hopeful and sometimes film caustic and with certain doses of humor. It dispenses completely with the easy tear and manages to reflect the tenacity and the vitality of a man whose body is dead.
The first thing could one think when you see the lauded movie of Julian Schnabel is in a direct comparison with "Mar adentro" from Amenabar. Not in vain, they share part of the theme, that of a protagonist, in the fullness of life, after an unfortunate fact are doomed to live prostrate in a bed. But there just all their differences.While the film in which Bardem embodies miraculously to Ramón Sanpedro, was a plea for euthanasia, capacity of a man in full possession of their faculties to decide if you want to assemble lifetime, "the Diving Bell and the Butterfly" is an ode to the life of a type which is much worse, utter isolation from the world into a body that does not respondincapable of something as simple as asking to change the channel on the TV when they issued the letter of adjustment.Jean-Dominique Bauby awakens in a hospital bed after having suffered a massive stroke. As he regains consciousness realizes that is unable to communicate, while their capacity to think, recall or imagine remains intact. From here on, Bauby will have to cope with their new situation and decide if you should try to get in touch with the people who try to help you to the only visible action which is capable is the one eye blinking.Thus, the film chronicles the true story of the protagonist, who against any odds, managed to dictate a book poetic and stark, free from the prejudices of the writer, for the sole purpose of recounting the experiences of someone locked up in his own body, as if I lived in a Diving Bell hermetic, but able to let fly the mind without any limit. His relationship with those who wanted him and made him more bearable captivity and, above all, his inner voice. A thought which became their only existence.I admit that the movie surprised me. Knowing the topic, it seemed impossible that director could deprive it of the two characteristics which could more easily hit: the extreme drama and slow (also extreme). But Schnabel manages to create a bright, honest, hopeful and sometimes film caustic and with certain doses of humor. It dispenses completely with the easy tear and manages to reflect the tenacity and the vitality of a man whose body is dead.It took us a while to see front image of the prominence, following its evolution since it comes out of coma from the inside, as if we were caught up with him in those tissues and organs that do not obey our orders. For when finally shows us her figure, we're totally on their side, we have already shared part of their suffering and their change of aspect we hit with more intensity.The only parties that my commitment to the film was less were in the numerous flashbacks about the previous life of the protagonist, little or nothing to bring to his new situation. The vision of his previous work, the relationship with their children, with his ex-wife, or his father, not transmitted me that more desolation by his loss. In those moments I look forward to again display its constant in their new situation struggle, his sense of humor, his Narrator inner voice.After a movie as well, hard to tell someone, "my life is shit" (something that my optimistic nature prevents me from thinking). Perhaps, in many cases, be true the saying and not aware of what have until we lose it.
3,206
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3474
Andrés Pons
El maligno
3
5
muchocine
Temperate film shot with great neatness taking its time in each one of the legends that ends up affecting the family. Breathtaking views of nature where the great photography, elegance in the sets and costumes with the appropriate music accompanied all this in a good script is checked.
Portuguese horror movies is absent, only is recognizable to my a couple of co-productions.Armando de Osorio in the saga of the Templars had production Portuguese as well as the saga of ZE DO CAIXEO half Brazilian and Portuguese capital, apart from that little can highlight one of the most unknown in our lares cinematographies.The couple TIAGO GUEDES and FREDERICO SERRA after some certainly interesting shorts. RAIO, agree now on pointed a talent to describe family relationships. With performers from the culebron two loves, that would probably be the favorite of both authors series that draw from it all its actors.This film confronts several fronts with great elegance, on the one hand traditional legends of his country, where there is no shortage exorcisms, spiritualism and possessions.On the other hand it deepens in family relations with great firmness, helped by the good to make the cast.That nobody expected shrillness nor pure terror, the music is not high, not contemplate murder in mass or psychopaths hungry for blood.It is a temperate film, shot with great neatness taking its time in each one of the legends that ends up affecting the family. Breathtaking views of nature where the great photography, elegance in the sets and costumes with the appropriate music accompanied all this in a good script is checked. It is a serious terror with well described characters arriving to create tension and discover juicy Portuguese folklore.Recommended despite its slow pace.
3,207
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3802
Kiko de España
Indiana Jones y el Reino de la Calavera de Cristal
5
5
muchocine
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is probably the best film which will provide us with the year that is dot to start.
I must admit that Indiana Jones and the last crusade, seen just before the latest installment. It is not aging well. It is the unique adventure of the doctor Jones with downtime and not tedious minutes but little busy. I remember that while revised could not stop thinking in this fourth part, give the stop to the dvd and plug this new adventure. that it discovers as the better and more authentic in the series.Let me: I love the search for the Ark and the damn Temple is megadivertida, but is that the very essence of adventure is concentrated in the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. An (unexpected and majestic) Sean Connery prostrate in a wheelchair, drooling (but classy) puts us in a situation: 1951, Dr. Jones is prejubilado and amateur butt to beekeeping because he believes that can preserve the life of insects in the honey.One day, while the doctor take a NAP in your garden with the foot supported by a strange trunk, Mutt Williams, a musical representative of three to the fourth with a ridiculous mustache, it sneaks into the House to steal a microphone of gold, possession of the doctor, in an attempt to record a catchy single, the song of the summer, with his new signing.Indy has the dream lightweight he wakes and Williams flees on motorcycles until Indy, whip in hand, and with a few f/x left in his underwear to the Transformers, is mounted in the back seat. Then come the tributes and surprise: slope down and without brakes reach the 14th km/h and where they now had trams occurs a leafy pine forest. and a mysterious cave where attempts to hide the bird of prey. Once inside unleashes Madness: aliens, women malvadísimas as you've never seen and a final twist that you could never imagine that you read out there.Full of scatological humor (thought that eschatological linkearía at what Yes?) and without the usual moralina to which we are accustomed to its director, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is probably the best film which will provide us with the year that is dot to start.A 9'5, innocent! (see the day of publication of this criticism)
3,208
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3775
Raccord
El Infierno del Odio
4
5
muchocine
When Kurosawa left the Sake and switched to the Bourbon.
The simple moral dilemmas and the most possible masticaditos, have always plagued the Hollywood Thriller, to try to give depth in the background, mere stories of cops and thieves. Remember the very famous end of Seven: do kill the murderer of your wife if you had a gun in his hand? "Or Dirty Harry" to stop a serial killer is necessary always adhere to laws garantistas? "The hell of the hatred" (1961 Kurosawa) is no exception to the rule: "Do Salvarías life to a child, at the expense of your money?"? And Kurosawa, in one of his less lyrical productions and personal, presents us with a film calcada to the American canon. Since the Westernization of the characters (even children play dresses of the Wild West) up to the pace of the American suspense and its numerous plot twists. Handles with ease the elements of intrigue and wheel a brutal film: but without grace, as if trying to imitate to Fritz Lang or other masters of the classic crime film.There is a hero that his friends leave only, efficient police disturbed by the intelligence of the antagonist, a fourth power willing to collaborate with the order to capture the malefactor, a stroll by the lower depths of the city and a redemption of the villain of the piece at the end of the footage. Or a novelty, or a single element or anything. Perhaps only the sequence of the discotheque, which in 7 minutes is more "Nouvelle Vague" many movies of an hour and a half of Godard.Y is a pity, as we have said, because it is a brilliant story told with mastery and a narrative pulse who never trembles, but with very little originality and exotic charm. 8 But with a tantrum for not putting a 9.
3,209
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3248
Emilio Calvo de Mora
Sunshine
2
5
muchocine
Bump of huge proportions, Sunshine, however, contains details of film in height with a superb technical invoice. Where is the bug? In the lack of interest of what counts, not to believe his proposal in the scrambled of topics.
The epic of Galactic Heroes is to never return. His aura of legend is forged in the stars, which is the environment more conducive to daydreaming and the collective mythification. Science fiction film covers the vacuum that has left the western or inspiration medievalist cinema. Props is obviously different, but the pattern, the archetypes and the narrative structure is, in essence, identical. Sunshine is a perfect show of science fiction; not so much as well as entertainment. Danny Boyle, his manager enthusiastic, naive peca, gets carried away by the apocalyptic game paraphernalia and forgets to attend some promising characters with greater care, but they just lost in the Vertigo of your company. Sunshine promises in his boot: the ship conspired to deposit a nuclear charge that revive in a dying sun. Implausible, away from my emotional experience and, apparently, not confirmed by science, the issue gets out of hand in the middle of the journey and the astronauts are perishing as flies in a glass of vinegar sidereal. The topics are accumulated without possible fracture. Joins bad luck with Galactic predestination and the technological hubbub (homicidal lights, computers that wash their hands like Pontius Pilate) becomes gibberish out of my reach. One is happy to have enjoyed 2001, an Odyssey of the space or the complete series of Alien. I am not, obviously, fan of the genre, but there are measurable incentive, spaces where know one how to move and how to enjoy. Not here: Sunshine despises commercial tapes of similar format as Armaggedon thread and is installed with an almost unbearable complacency in a type of film supposedly more seriously, less satisfied with the ups and downs of the Hollywood production. And in the willful exercise quasi new age sinks. amazes at tedious levels of space interstellar or like you call.The dispute of survival in the ship (save them, save Earth, perhaps missing the cheerleader) is resolved more than quietly, without dramatic fanfare. Everything is left to embrace by a thick boredom, scarcely benefited by the very correct staging of the director and the contained work acting from a cast that could have given him more literary bait. The technical quality, in these times, not moves. We are already saturated lights of colors and roller coasters at the gates of casa.
3,210
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2985
Francisco Bellón
Disturbia
2
5
muchocine
Disturbia is a thriller of adolescents where blends intrigue, suspense, testosterone and the easy scare in equal parts.
The great masterpieces of art history are considered authentic jewelry, a world heritage site. Nobody conceptualize a painter to perform a new version of paintings by Goya and Rembrandt, or a sculptor to update the Venus de Milo or the Discobolus of Myron, or a musician to compose a new piece based on Vivaldi's the four seasons. But when it comes to the seventh art, it seems that there are no problems that are distorting and wrecking real masterpieces.There is no doubt that the window indiscreet, Alfred Hitchocock is one of the films of all time. For this reason, what sense is now doing a remake? Well, not even Disturbia is a proper remake, but it conceals in the magical definition of inspired en. It must be very rewarding to some filmmakers believe that they are capable of improving a movie like the window indiscreet and overcome a master such as Alfred Hitchcock. Disturbia is a thriller of adolescents where blends intrigue, suspense, testosterone and the easy scare in equal parts. The tape takes horrors to boot, being its director deeply concerned to show the viewer the inner and outer world of the protagonist. And incidentally, let the camera will delight in the figure of Sarah Roemer, new Muse of American teen film. D. j. Caruso all efforts made to distance themselves as much as possible from the lengthened shadow of Hitchcock, and in that search is when the film sinks final and fully. The only moments of true intrigue are due to the appearances of the character of David Morse and his disturbing performance far superior to the of a pamphilus Shia LaBeouf.Disturbia is a remake of hidden in one of the best films of all time intrigue, the window indiscreet. If someone was so naive to think that the film of D. j. Caruso could even give the size in so unequal comparison, in the film you will find the sad truth.
3,211
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1481
Emilio Calvo de Mora
Babel
4
5
muchocine
This newly lighted 21st century epic. Generous gift for future generations to illustrate the desquiciamiento of this society now. Emotional gift for those who live here and find this terrible mirror of our differences and our similarities...
Babel is a beautiful exercise in research on solitary confinement. Moving, and emotional, at times bombastic this third film of González Iñarritu complete what the author called "the trilogy of pain" with loves dogs and 21 grams. The brittle narrative of his argument emphasizes the also fragmentary nature of the human condition: good and evil do not exist as sistematizable nomenclature, everything is moldable and melts arbitrated by subtle and sometimes intangible threads. An event that happened in the past can inevitably influence the future. A fortuitous gesture (the gift of a Winchester that a Japanese tourist makes a Moroccan Guide) may condition one huge range of other facts, also incidental, years later. This butterfly effect takes in Babel huge dramatic dimensions, based on universal and developed firmly, without tenderness, splendidly lunchs feelings about a sincere speech that speaks, among many other things, pain and fugal happiness (the marriage going to Morocco to see if there, being alone, they are) or the unlikely concatenation of coincidences that can upset our placid life and our upholstered environment.For all this, González Iñarritu mounts three films in one: is not anything new since loves dogs or 21 grams also developed this narrative technique with different results. Morocco, Japan and the border of Mexico and the United States are the scenarios to put the pieces of this racial, cross-cultural, globalized and babélico crossword ending seize our ability of amazement to leave us mystified by the lightness of being, as I said Kundera, and the bombastic pageantry of random.All the characters of Babel are marked by an error: Moroccan children and the tragic shooting, the Mexican maid that does not take parental authorization to remove us children, girl Japanese sordomuda who has not passed its isolation and the loss of his mother, the American marriage which aims to revive their love in the grey a postcard of the Atlas.Este film has no expiration date: is entrenched in some imperfect virtues, but emotional. It is true that González Iñarritu is already pursuing with this narrative model too anchored in a formal pattern and linguistically surpassed, but we are still feeling an itching, a fresh outburst in the perfect images to this Mexican artist who knows just get into the neon of Tokyo that drag their greedy camera on the trails of dust of the Maghreb. In its says, some elongated episode (the wedding in Mexico) or excessive time which puts the Japanese girl, whose contest (where relevant) does not mark the tone of the events on which the film is based. This does not harm the overall impression: that we are witnessing a masterful piece orchestrated with craft and feeling and that explicit, evil that in spite of us, the barbaric of the world, their disenchantment... In a necessary aside, I note the pleasant feeling of reduction in cache that have been offered divos as Brad Pitt Cate Blanchett to take charge of their characters or do an honest and free from glamour to which we are accustomed. Támden González Iñárritu-Arriaga, director and script writer, seems to have agreed a separation. As it should be. The combined dolor-emoción - tragedy is already sufficiently exploited.Only by the very methodical process of assembling the film chapter in the history of cinema with independence that is being nourished by both award and is there already deserves bound (then you have to correct or enhance the post) to lie (Eastwood, Scorsese) heavyweights in the Oscars to come.
3,212
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1428
Florinda Chic
Shortbus
5
5
muchocine
The bigoted Viewer or you feel rejection to contemplate pornography not aguantará or three minutes of projection. The cured of ghosts will enjoy a fun film that speaks for all of us at some point in our lives.
Do three years Michael Winterbottom inaugurated with 9 songs what one might call? indie-porn?, independent film with numerous explicit sex scenes. The film showed plainly the exchange of fluids of a couple that combine this activity with go from concert to concert. The sex in this tape - large silences - was pure exhibition at the service of a plot without rhyme or reason.Everything that was superfluous and free in the above sense of the excellent Shortbus cobra. The director signed a comedy that could well have done some sueltecitos Robert Altman or Woody Allen. Does John Cameron Mitchell, shows sex Yes, but in all its splendor: solo sex, sex to escape from loneliness, group sex? but as a vehicle to express the emotional situation of each character, not as they excuse to show flesh.The shortbus of the title is the name given to the bus carried school children with difficulties that need more attention and the club libertine where the protagonists come together. In this place all can give free rein to their fantasies. There agree a gay couple in search of a third party which avive their relationship, a sex counselor anorgásmica and a dominatrice unable to maintain emotional bond with any human being without the whip in his hand.In general, lost souls and bodies. As a New York Fund which, as one of the characters says is the city where goes the people to redeem their sins. And speaking of sins, this film contains lots: ejaculations, cunnilingus, fellatio, sodomy? nothing is hinted, is live sex.The bigoted Viewer or you feel rejection to contemplate pornography not aguantará or three minutes of projection. The cured of ghosts will enjoy a fun film that speaks for all of us at some point in our lives. But saying that Shortbus is pornography, is like saying that eating, drinking, love is a film about Asian cuisine. I am much more injured in my sensitivity when I look on the big screen the Bacchanalian gore of Mel Gibson - for example - that genital feasts, but I am so rare and spirited.I would also point out that I do not agree with sentences of advertising claim of this tape:?Do if Almodóvar rodase for the first time, you do this film?. Not to mention. More or less daring scenes of Pepi Luci Bom or labyrinth of passion were pure provocation and transgression in a given historical moment. In Shortbus no bad taste of any kind, as there it in the bed of two lovers.
3,213
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1574
Silvia Giner
Manuale D'Amore 2
5
5
muchocine
The film rocks you between comedy and drama in a delicious way, no doubt an experience which you will not regret to say what they say some. Your make case to the ironcita...
Giovani Veronesi with 32 scripts to their backs, 10 films directed and performed 5, arrives with the continuation of the italianamente famous "Amore Manuale", film of little impact on Spain (I think that this gives it the climate), but very famous in Italy and the rest of Europa.Hay who highlight that this Italian film exceeds its predecessor in all aspects (Manuale d´amore). The actors (including Elsa who I think has done the best role of her fateful career) are enormous, the screenplay is fresh, fast, fun and the movie has some spectacular levels, as for example those of Monica Belucci just at the end, without words I was to see it. Fantastic makeup (subtle, invisible, natural), endearing band sound e insist a great script.I recommend highly to see her in original version, it can be a little heavy at first but when the ear is usually is much better, as you can appreciate all the viz comic already alone has Italian tonality. By the way that Elsa Pataki, passes successfully this course with a great accent.The great Belucci is a Panther of the camera is as always spectacular, but as you say the full cast is beautifully directed.The film rocks you between comedy and drama in a delicious way, no doubt an experience which you will not regret to say what they say some. Your make case to the ironcita.
3,214
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1170
Matías Cobo
El truco final (The Prestige)
2
5
muchocine
The smart will solve the game of deception earlier than others, but the feeling of all at the end of the long function believe that it is tantamount to having completed a complex sudoku.
In recent years, few Directors have pointed out so many ways shortly after to walk his career as Christopher Nolan. I do not know I can think of a more resounding cover letter as having directed and written Memento, a tape original, brain and with a power of seduction that, shortly after release (year 2000), became a cult movie instantly. It is logical that the offers more attractive and wealthy llovieran you just after this phenomenal success. His next album, another thriller with characters in distressing situations, already featured actors such as outstanding as to Al Pacino. Insomnia is an interesting film, but low brilliance. This film was followed his debut in a blockbuster with Batman Begins. Nolan again demonstrated its ability to make art with almost everything it touches, it has or not billions after Yes. For all cash had deposited many expectations in the final trick (The Prestige), and for this reason, some we've stayed with honey on the lips this time.The film is limited to offer the typical Russian dolls game in which the spectator is surmising what lies at the end of every plot turn. The smart will solve the game of deception earlier than others, but the feeling of all at the end of the long function believe that it is tantamount to having completed a complex sudoku. It finishes even hook the story of friendship turned hatred between two of the best magicians of his time. And despite the fact that all its artistic elements (interpretations, locker rooms or picture) rallen a height more than estimable, one is left with the feeling of having attended one it tape excessively cold and only concerned about carefully hide all their plot recesses.It is curious that this tape has coincided with another of similar context as the magician and that, in both cases, the magic has been absent rather. It seems that, after both surfeit of tricks, in none of the two works we have achieved see the desired prestige all great magician must provide at the end of his performance.
3,215
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3213
Bruji
El Orfanato
3
5
muchocine
The directorial debut of Jota Bayonne, alternating sequences achieved absolute master of film with those of an expert filmmaker videoclipero. A clear example in which a virtually perfect script aspires to masterpiece.
So far, there is much what we learned in the field of terror. Final destination, for example, was in charge of claiming that the plans outlined by the death are difficult to Dodge. House on Haunted Hill noted how the status of one of the protagonists, maintained secret, knew to influence the course of events. Mythical titles as the entity or Poltergeist showed that, in his day, thought us of science fiction: the possibility not only to detect, but also to measure with sophisticated instruments the alleged presence of other dimensions. The Lair, for its part, made understand that the facts that produce fear in adults come often from child's play. And while thirteen ghosts pursues the piece that is missing; The others, the last step or Amityville recall that the great mysteries remain always hidden in attics, basements and sheds... or at the end of corridors endless, as it warned Kubrick on the shining. On the basis of these premises, between the friends of fear, an obvious question arises. Would the creation of a new story that, fleeing from the evils of contemporary cinema, regardless of material of offal and the abuse of sound effects to scare, was able to shake the viewer be possible?. Yes-- is in the script selected by the Sundance Institute, in origin, giving rise to a short called I know that you're there, and ended by calling the attention of producer Guillermo del Toro. Shot on sets of Pharaonic dimensions in the purest style of the classic Hollywood, the orphanage draws on a multitude of predetermined concepts of gender to give shape to an intense drama. All of this is treated with an extreme meticulousness that away her of plagiarism and the attractive temptation of the tribute. Don't talk about a typical horror film, although small hands that the role of the walls start to step to the initial credit titles already produced concern. The script by Sergio g. Sánchez, as it has come to the screen, presents two fissures unforgivable, if we take into account that this was revised and perfected for a year and a half. The first of them kicks off the agonising dramatic load of the plot, ignores the basic recommendations of the Spanish Ministry of Social Welfare and contradicts both the present and the past of the protagonist with his partner. The second should be sought in the police files created on own account. However, his greatness lies in that both go unnoticed in a hypnotic and enveloping, history that deprived of the Faculty of thinking and banishes the sense of deception. The central axis of the argument, by itself alone, is so powerful and impressive, as capable of feeding real fears that calan in the mood and remain in the memory of the Viewer; leaving the film, difficult it will be repair in its shortcomings, and liberating exhale a sigh of relief, because it was not even a nightmare, just a good movie that disrupts the soul. Now good to repair in the execution of the script-after praise the meticulous production design and the exquisite art direction of Joseph Rosell - the set ends not convincing; still, perhaps attributable this unpleasant impression to the address of a novel technical team. While the soundtrack remains in a flat second discrete; the Assembly, undoubtedly correct, not you appreciated or a single virguería that makes it worthy of mention, reaching a photograph that, at no time, reaches the height of the product. The director, for his part, alternates achieved sequences of absolute master of film with those of a video-clip, the latter corresponding to the filming taking place in open spaces. It won't be easy to forget the sway of the camera in the English hideaway with adult Laura, nor the creation of contaminated passages of a rarefied atmosphere from the best classic horror, nor memorable frames that show close-ups of a brilliant performance, nor the tenderness of two looks intersect with a piano. Unfortunately, they are not easy to forget the shots to the ground, desencuadrados frames nor you retimes them beach. This irregularity reaches to the heart of the orphanage, Belén Rueda, who fails to establish any chemical with Fernando Cayo nor with the young Prince Roger, brilliant in all interventions. A character who, as the woman that gives life, knows traced from nothing all of the mock actress with the face of panic after the cry of action!, to the aspect that should have the fortitude if it decided to personify it. To configure the rest of the cast, the direction of strong bet casting by the secondary actors, with the priceless stage presence of Geraldine Chaplin and the invaluable collaboration of a great Lady of Catalan Theatre, Montserrat Carulla. In all cases, the orphanage is a major success of the Spanish film, insofar as it provides a clear and concise about the type of film response that the public wants to see and why pay (an important fact) in the halls of projection (those who might be closed). The kind of film which reconciles to critique and masses, perhaps to contain an undeniable American touch that both like the viewer and so little patriotic filmmakers. And is the first still believe that you to get lost in "the most personal film of..""there will always be time, or not." Acclaimed by European critics, acquired by the American industry, unbeatable springboard of a rookie team; for the obsessive fixation of this servant by the "flashbacks", it will always be the essential reference that leads to the magisterial resolution of a plot with only three flashes. Fast. Decisive. Sharp. One, two, three, touches the wall!.
3,216
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1216
Yojimbo
Banderas de nuestros padres
2
5
muchocine
Alarming improper this director's boredom is mixed with some childish critical intentions.
I record I told him more than one that this film gave me bad spine since that I saw the trailer. I tend to make mistakes, but in this case I not missed.Clint Eastwood returns to the fray with 2 movies on a same historical fact, in the manner of marketing of Quentin Tarantino and his Bodrio-Bill, but with a lot more attractive, obviously. And yet with this first film has had one of their biggest film stumbles. It seems not only invaded by a nostalgic sense of times past, but it is also a historical fact in a way nothing attractive when it could have exploited masterly as tends it to do.Alarming improper this director's boredom is mixed with some childish critical intentions linking directly to that "nana" used as the main theme of the soundtrack he composed.A story of soldiers idolized during the battle of Iwo Jima could have been an exemplary portrait of an uncomfortable but necessary situation for many people for different reasons. However in this film stays with 3 characters with whom little is empatiza and with a structure of such child as warmed-over flashbacks.The shadow of Spielberg is elongated, and in this film for two reasons. The first because an opportunity with big budget that rarely has had, and the second because after the Normandy landings in saving private Ryan, all sequences of war seems that they cut by this pattern has given Eastwood. And this is another case. But with better technology, clear. And other trifles that Spielberg did not include. But it seems that Clint passed chupi pumpkin shooting it it.In short, a very great disappointment of someone who directs masterpieces with extreme simplicity but great taste and talent. I hope the second part with more suspicion than to this first.
3,217
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1630
Francisco Bellón
Lola: La película
2
5
muchocine
Lola: The movie falls in all the defects and topics of the biopics, but it also has some exceptional performances as greater virtue.
Until a few years ago, say that someone wore "a life of film" was more a phrase than anything else. But that was before that Hollywood discovered the film potential that had certain public figures, especially artists. Since then we have witnessed an explosion of biographical films or biopic, and as so many trends, it was soon imported by the rest of the world.In Spain it took longer to import such a trend, more than anything because it is difficult to make a tape of these characteristics than something new or different input with the existence of certain television programs. If first Camarón de la Isla, you now is the turn to another of the myths of Spanish flamenco, Lola Flores. Lola: The film tells the first thirty years of life of Lola Flores (Gala Évora), focusing on its human side and his turbulent personal life and various relations maintained with men as Manolo Caracol (José Luis García Pérez). Miguel Hermoso (who went to Lola Flores in Truhanes) faces the challenge with courage, but unfortunately fails to give the film such a vision that distinguishes it from typical biopic. The film lacks originality and freshness, it is full of very well-worn situations, and incurred a large number of topics. The pace prints Miguel Hermoso is not the most appropriate, such slow that just becoming tedious and monotonous. However, and despite its flaws, the film manages to convey a great deal of realism, with a very elegant atmosphere. The best of the film, is undoubtedly its exceptional cast, bright all, although particularly highlights a great José Luis García Pérez and Ana Fernández, David Arnaiz. Big words deserve exceptional interpretation of Gala Évora, genuine revelation of the season, away completely from the imitation, giving his work a great strength and sensitivity. The young actress Cadiz full screen in each appearance, and no doubt we recommend actively go looking site for the Goya Award for best actress.
3,218
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3065
Daniel Galindo
Líbero
4
5
muchocine
An opera prima close, concrete and intelligent, so is the debut in the direction of an actor that coexists with the need to tell stories that, since simplicity, trap even to the most elite Viewer.
When premiered a production of our neighbours, I do not know you, but I always think of all the other tapes that have fallen by the wayside, so to a certain extent is understandable to all the films of Italian invoice that we receive provide a remarkable level of quality.This mosaic of feelings rebuilt by a clever and endearing little in keeping with a new way of communicating that it is giving as a light counterattack to the cinema of mass consumption: actor Kim Rossi Stuart has clear ideas and has the precise mechanisms, as well as the necessary experience - tanning under the orders of others has served him-, to set up an account that articulates everyday elementsnarrated from the simplicity of approach and without the pretensions of many who believe they were born knowing.It is only necessary to flee the pretension and treat the Viewer as an equal, and not as a mere consumer to forget quickly, to enter the elite club to which already belong the brothers Ulloa, Sánchez-Arévalo and certainly veterans as Icíar Bollain, Manuel Poirier, Nanni Moretti and Gracia Querejeta – by reducing it to the Mediterranean area. Líbero is another example of how film-making on the basis of a concise idea not to miss in emotional subterfuges that cost out or reload footage with unnecessary embellishments.Here it is important the well that word at the right time, the hypnotic power of a look, the value of silence. The film avoids rapid tear, melancholy component usually sweetening unnecessarily. We would appreciate that the father of the creature does not have recourse to how easy and on the other hand to play with us putting us always on the cutting edge, on the edge of the precipice, with little evidence and challenges.Returning to our theory on what comes or not to trade screens, the problem is not that there little permeability in our face to the Italian film industry, but that the owners of the roost ever were interested in less a close, simple and well told story. Unfortunately and, with exceptions, it is something inherent to all cinemas of the old continent.
3,219
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2365
Bruji
La vida de los otros
4
5
muchocine
We we have a practically perfect development, that part of one of the last decades more intelligent approach to lead in an impeccable direction of actors.
Fifteen minute. Scarcity of production, poor art direction, photography of dubious quality, excessive recuperated planes, absence in the synchronization of the Assembly, predictable initial dialogues. With these components, eighty percent of American films are sentenced. German films still has not spoken his last word."Clumsy devise" leads us to a conclusion so shocking as desperate, a friend who lacks answers and a situation that begins to be nearby. In the end, "what does an author if it cannot write?." Same as a projectionist without film, that a Miller without wheat. "There's nothing". In how many times is formularían this question many Spanish writers in 1936?. On the other hand, is how he felt Luis Rosales?.A point of inflection, and the work, according to the compositional procedure of the piece of music that praises, accentuating the existing contrast between exposure of technical factors and the development of the script, faces a trajectory of ascending evolution culminating in the film jewel as we know it.It is likely that Lenin had to leave to hear the Apasionata, number 23 of Beethoven to be able to complete the revolution. It is certain that the sonata Gabriel Yared engaged in a good man manages to tear down the walls of incomprehension, the stronger we are able to build human beings of thought.From this moment, the directorial debut of Florian Henckel Von Donnersmarck radiates a supernatural magnetism that envelops the Viewer, supersedes the prejudices that could survive against European cinema, the less commercial, and satisfies the critical sense. The shortage of production is justified. Do the pale picture in which the sky is never blue and the painful art direction? often chaotic - which comes from the wing this history are not offset by an excellent script, they are relegated to a background of intentionally, deprived of any attractive element that seeks to undermine the role to the account, which can distract from the plot. It is then when the Assembly demonstrates its consistency and can be seen clearly notable printed narrative rhythm based plot, in which the most accurate predictions is diluted.We are, therefore, to a practically perfect development, that part of one of the last decades more intelligent approach to lead in an impeccable direction of actors.The impressive bet casting is based on a curious and cash triangle. The insecure and easily impressionable character of the Martha delicious, Martina Gedeck. The almost British phlegm of the impassive German conformist, so well portrays Sebastian Koch on the character that both recalls which interpreted Ralph Fiennes in the faithful gardener. The penetrating and indecipherable gaze of the captain of the Stasi to the life-giving Ulrich Mühe, actor fetish of Michael Haneke, worthy successor of the best dramatic records of Anthony Hopkins.Esta film is positioned within the emerging German film of recent years, placing his debutant film director in that quarry of Directors than with exquisite precision has managed to confront its history. We should not forget the audacity of the sinking of Oliver Hirschbiegel, who, in the year 2004, dared to treat the figure of the Führer from a human perspective. Not the look nostalgic that throws Wolfgang Becker in Good Bye Lenin!. Now the news reaching US from the "democratic" Germany, dated just twenty years ago, and that they seem science fiction, so far away from the adventures filled with Western supporters that we met in 1966 due to the Rasgada curtain of Hitchcock.Tres essential titles that obey a common denominator, the ability of their filmmakers to incorporate the public sharingmaking us participants, direct witnesses of the facts which are narrated. An important lesson about how has to tell a story.Obviously, Hollywood rewards it. Its peculiar and always tendentious approach not repaired in the impressive work of the main actor in the majestic direction, nor on the quality of his original screenplay, but recognizes it as a whole, perhaps due to not only film. Is possible that also by the longing for the old days, those that still had a tangible enemy of easy location. In any case, black lists, the search of delatores confidants, espionage and the marginalization of the possible subversive foci, not them are unknown.
3,220
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2037
Luna
Alta sociedad
2
5
muchocine
Not noted any actor and our Penelope makes waters as regards credibility incarnating the role of a luxury prostitute coming less troubled cancer.
The second film Martha Fiennes as Director does not convince the criticism and will have to wait until its premiere on 18 may, to know if it convinces the Spanish public. In 2005 this film closes Cannes Film Festival and has had to wait, for reasons that the own Director known until 2007 for power release in movie theaters. As a curious note, will debut soon in Spain than in the Kingdom Unido.Martha Fiennes tells existential vacuum in refined and stiff high English society through the life of a lawyer of success (Damian Lewis) and his wife (Kristin Scott Thomas), an art dealer. However, all the narrative approach is bombastic, abusing in excess of planning was let go by the grandeur of the environments and an excessively high soundtrack.Not noted any actor and our Penelope makes waters as regards credibility incarnating the role of a luxury prostitute coming less troubled cancer. It like all those fans of "Pe" and "The English patient" because repeated the couple protagonist of this film on this, from a subsidiary relationship this time.
3,221
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3120
Adrian Bravo
Rec
3
5
muchocine
The film works more as a comedy than as a horror film, although before viewing announced trumpeted that those who suffer from heart problems or have epilepsy refrain see it...
You've been ever in any passage of terror? Probably yes. Reactions tend to be very many-colored. There are people who you say: Damn, I never go into a site, still trembling me legs. And other: psé, because it was not bad, it's always, blood, monsters, already expected me. As well, do case to the reactions of your body against this type of attractions to predict what you expect out of the pasaje del terror is Rec, whose premiere was in Sitges the past October 5. Another clear reference to talk about the new film of the director of fragile or Darkness is The Blair Witch Project. It is inevitable to think about her when you see the film, there are practically modelled scenes. However, in this new version there are more joke and nasty, much more Picardy and above all, laughter. Because let us not forget that Rec is a film of old-style zombies though clothed digitally and as a reality show televised (gentlemen, the mockumentary is fashion, we're going to do), and that gives much but to much laughter. The argument is simple, as it should be in such proposals. Occurs an emergency in a block of flats since before adorable snowing alarm to the neighborhood with horrible screams. Nobody even knows that an evil virus and that of course it becomes bloody zombies to the holiest has flooded throughout the community, and a reporter and his camera, which are making a reportage about the firefighters nocturnal life, head over there hoping to clarify the matter. Once there are locked at the mercy of the virus, since police forces have sealed the building. Ta ta cháan!!! With this premise, it begins the dance, the blood and the bad ostia. It is important little more. I think that the film works more as a comedy as horror film, although before viewing announced to trumpeting those who suffer heart problems or have epilepsy refrain see it (we may notify because the heart accelerates with laughter), although I have no doubt that the most sensitive can be more than one good scare and have wanted to do pee. If you are thinking of visiting a park of attractions for Halloween, think twice. Go see Rec in the cinema you can get much cheaper.
3,222
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4288
Iñaki Bilbao
Forajidos de Siam
2
5
muchocine
Mediocre Thai action desenfrendada film, with what the exoticism is served, along with the lack of rigor.
"Three most dangerous gangs join to steal all the jewelry of a peaceful and prosperous people." In fact, they achieve their purpose, after killing some people and cause great damage. The police don't know where hiding, though they know that the head is remote somewhere in the jungle. "But a shrewd police inspector follows them and is gradually capturing several members of the band that carried them the rest."Mediocre Thai action desenfrendada film, with what the exoticism is served, along with the lack of rigor. Everything is excessive, from violence, to performances, except in two or three cases. The tape could have been indigesta, but his lack of great pretensions and a desire to lùdico inherent in any time in history, manage, ultimately to be something nice. No good, no, but it is funny at some point and, surprisingly, entretenidilla. Cast bells on-the-fly, because everything is quite seen but not bored.Best thing is the photo which highlights the impressive landscapes where with these beautiful jungles, the film is shot with their streams and so. And also the character of the head of the band, a kind of zany Demi-God of evil, almost indestructible. The truth is that it is not anything good, but can be seen.
3,223
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2024
Emilio Calvo de Mora
Cache Escondido
2
5
muchocine
The film is deception, the end and Cape. Haneke dominates the medium of film, but mocks a spectator who manipulates with style. The film is at the end, after handling.
Intellectuals, in France, are legion, are a few heroes, are admirable, respected. The Gallic intellectual he relieves the mundane with a Stakhanovite work routines and proletarian commitment and he deals in a microphone or gives a column to live free of the beauties of the vulgar and on that altar despotrique with dispassion against the discourse of the social, the political plot and forms of culture. The protagonist of this film, Georges Laurent, superbly played by Daniel Auteil, is that hero: the character that does not construct his life under the avatar of the epic to the classic mode, but escalafona in society as the Warrior of yesteryear and occupies an irreplaceable place, the place of the critic. That, in Spain, is still unthinkable. France, in terms of secularism in these fringes of culture, leads forty years ahead.Haneke, director, is one critic: one that has arrobado the public disclosure of political correctness bass which pulsate, bitter, lies, disasters, miseries and barbaric of varied coat.Haneke is a fable about the hostility of the welfare State, a moral tale about the fragility of this Europe of alliances and pacts fragmented by imperatives too powerful local, represented by a man of letters, a well-known intellectual that warns how something or someone filmed you and sent the tapes of that recording. That feeling of being spied produces a series of foreseeable consequences, but one misses the logic, which is the one that supports the bulk of the plot of the film. Laurent begins to seriously question his life to the point of inquire with calling cuasidetectivesca on its own existence on its own past. Yours is the past of France since the World War II pre-feed wounds of centuries of resignations and social fractures.Incorporated in a flamboyant design of thriller, cache exhibits a more than convincing domain of narrative. The plot is opening new frames and certainly closing others. However, the degree of suspense is abruptly aborted.It is not possible to liven up a film of this political depth without that trade concessions, at times, seem too light. As if Haneke knew that it should reduce the doctrinal and apocalyptic tone and allow scraps of sanity, fresh aires, kites that fly the hope of redemption. Language, overly elliptical, fragmented, as a broken post, forced to take a very active position in the viewing of the film: fiction and reality, the traditional instruments of literary composition, is engarzán here added formidably.The tapes are traps of the real ideological pumps that dinamitan the placid book life of a marriage entirely functional, integrated and, above all, Yorick shielded to the rigors of the reality. When the protection mechanisms are disabled, life becomes thriller, adopts nuances of pure suspense and ends, bound and stubbornly, questioning the true nature of the human soul, which connects the banal with the tragic, the strictly cultural with the pathological.The film closes without closing it: proposes everything without giving valid solutions. There is a sense of deception. The film is deception, the end and Cape. Haneke dominates the medium of film, but mocks a spectator who manipulates with style. The film is at the end, after handling.
3,224
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3642
Sara Rodriguez
La Torre de Suso
4
5
muchocine
A fun, entertaining and charming film that tells a story of people like you or like me and let a good taste out of the film.
The film begins when Cundo (Javier Cámara) returns to Asturias after 10 years to attend the funeral of his best friend, Suso. "When plan is to spend a couple of days in the village, getting drunk with his friends from childhood and go by where he had come, but that's not going to be as easy as he thinks: ex girlfriends, ex lovers and parents are loose ends that need a solution and to make matters worse discovers that Suso also had left a case pending so his stay extends far more than I had planned.""La Torre de Suso" is a sometimes bittersweet comedy, but also fun and upbeat, is above all a tribute to friendship. This friendship with capital letters that supports the passage of time, distance, loss and the routine. The friendship that he is able to overcome anything and "survive" even to the death.Best thing about the movie is (apart from Javier camera to see how improves with age!) its simplicity. Without a super eloquent and memorable dialogues is able to get hooked and make you connect in some way with the characters. And it is this simplicity that allows linking a portrait of life in mining communities with a story about feeling lost and not knowing where is heading your life, friendship, drugs or love and give us really unforgettable scenes.Ultimately, there is not a movie that go expecting a super big production with metaphysical dialogues or anything of the sort. It is a fun, entertaining and charming film that tells a story of people like you or like me and let a good taste out of the cinema. so glad to Spanish film support!
3,225
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3171
Rafa Delgado
High School Musical
3
5
muchocine
High School Musical is a production dedicated in particular to the youth audience is predictable and topical to say enough is enough, but that is quite fun, very nice and very entertaining.
I saw her pass in the channel four original Disney Channel High School Musical production, a phenomenon that has stuck strong well with teenagers from all over the world and, above all, in States Unidos.El movie has broken all records since its original transmission on January 20. With its multiple reruns on the Disney Channel has already garnered an audience of 30 million American viewers, while the soundtrack reached the top of the Top 10 Hits. Deserves a special mention his six nominations at the Academy Awards on television, the Emmy (best cast of actors, best choreography, best direction, Best Original Soundtrack, outstanding children's programming), which was made with two (choreography and outstanding children's programming).Cemented in (some of) the plot basis for Grease or Dinty Dancing, High School Musical is a production dedicated in particular to the youth audience (although there is also an aptísimo product for the whole family) that is predictable and topical to say enough is enough, but is quite fun, very nice and very entertaining. It does nothing or deceive anyone. It is sincere and contains a positive plot full of values of the family films of earlier, correct interpretations, catchy songs everywhere and much youthful energy. Highly recommended though not advised see it if one is very biased with this kind of movies.
3,226
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/361
Raccord
Vértigo
2
5
muchocine
Completely overrated and worst of Hitchcock. A story too stupid to take it seriously
Praised by critics, and considered one of the best films in the history of the cinema, to my seems completely overrated and worst of Hitchcock. A story too stupid to take it seriously and a completely sloppy character development, with touches of fantasy film stuck with shoehorn. Another bike trying to sell us. Hitchcock appears to have problems to create characters with whom the viewer identify. In fact it is the common denominator of his more loose films (are Topaz, to catch a thief, the shadow of a doubt?). But also appears on some of the best, as for example Rebecca: they are technically brilliant films, with very elaborate plots, but instances of cold and flat characters, that they do not connect with the viewer and which are little credible. In "Vertigo" ", I care very little, what happen to James Stewart, if you have fear of heights, or if he has fallen in love with a spirit." It is that honestly not have given me information that I identify with him and see him wander with the face of concern throughout the film, without the minimum interest for what should happen and believe me its character or a moment.Another recurring feature of Hitchcock is to show two readings of his characters, making the darker side of his personality, hidden to the other characters, is many times the real driving force for their actions. Great successes, are sometimes achieved but in Vertigo, it is very difficult to realize the intentions of the director and the interpretation of the strange behavior of the protagonist is already taken absolutely far-fetched. If you do not read the famous book of conversations with Truffaut, surely not you realize, that I actually wanted to do the orondo director was a study of necrophilia. Surprising, but adds nothing when enjoy the film, and in the case of the preceding paragraph; It produces only indifference. Furthermore I believe that he says little about the quality of his work, who is unable to show its purposes in a clear and understandable way, and expose them cryptically that only fans can decipher them.If we add to this a plot soporifera, improper English master, which consists of discovering with the friend James if Kim Novak this dead, mad, or asshole, we have left a very poor film. There are some tricks of very advanced special effects for its time and a pretty good soundtrack. The rest is boring and very pretentious.
3,227
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/457
Calaf
Alatriste
3
5
muchocine
It is seen in the film? Then if. It has enough interesting items than to enjoy, despite its excessive footage, although it is quite far from being a round movie.
I start by tell me I have not read the books of Reverte, and that did not expect much from the movie after the comments that I had arrived. They say that when used to highlight the picture setting. It is because the film is bad. No I would say both, but it is true the artistic direction acquired notoriety by their own merits and says of other sections like the script, the worst of the film. Alatriste like pieces, is a missed opportunity but to praise.I will try to not roll me much. To do this, nothing better than to synthesize what I liked and what is not.The good news: the audacity of production Yes. Each and every one of those technical paragraphs called: setting, locations, costumes, photography. The music will have to listen to it separate, but even the departure of band of people not has been able to appear me more accurate in the final battle. More impossible Spanish. I liked Viggo Mortensen. It has personality and magnetism. Transmits bitterness. The characterizations of historical characters, magnificent. It is a joy to enjoy some images - pictures. Spanish film shows once more know shooting history.The bad: is made to pieces. There is no connection in the history. It gives the feeling that they could have eliminated many scenes and nothing would have happened. That is not good, is a script problem.Other sequences become longer unnecessarily (the theatre, some inconsequential link landscapes) when not enough directly (which commits suicide when they will stop, a duel) because none of the character has not been explained and therefore the viewer cares a damn.The movie lacks humor. You can shoot a grim story and not lose the touch of humor inherent even in the most jodidas situations. Some salpicones blood stand out without.The question. It is seen in the film? Then if. It has enough interesting items than to enjoy, despite its excessive length, even if it is quite far from being a round and consistent movie. Despite all applaud her only for the attempt, media, and because more than one politician "missions of peace" put you the colorada face (although not fall that breva) of what was the Spanish army.
3,228
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3959
Monica Jordán
Juno
3
5
muchocine
The script environment and objective. We miss the audacity to Reitman in that aspect, but the film manages to entertain and look in the eye to a public tired of bland comedies with child spirit.
Jason Reitman debuted two years ago with his opera prima Thank you for smoking of which had also written the script. It was a comedy with an incisive script that portrayed with irony the hypocrisy of American society today. Sundance recognized him for his work and took several awards at different international festivals. With his new film, Juno, Reitman seems determined to repeat career and scheme: again a comedy, again, a script that beyond being the skeleton of the film is also their means and goal, again missing hand of direct and cynical humor, and again that criticism (something lighter than in Thank you for smoking) to American society. In short, the director seems to channel his career to a style of film that does work and which not only is good but that assures the success of independent festivals both from the point of view of the jurors (Sundance) and the popular (Gijón).Juno is not the young teenage American media. Juno is mature, cynical, ironic and a conception of the world very different from the rest of his teammates: on the basis of its cultural references (musical, cinematic and literary), passing by the type of guy who likes and ending with family relationship with his stepmother and his father. Juno, the film and the protagonist, seem to reach the screens with the healthy intention of remove all established, break stereotypes and molds to demonstrate how different also exists and is also much better than usual. This differentiation the causes the intelligent work of screenwriter Diablo Cody (already contracted by Spielberg to sign his next television project) who knows to capture in his character that view outsider who has failed a prototypical life. Their dialogues, acids and intelligent, are the great starting point of the film, and are supported by the excellent interpretation of Ellen Page, who has already demonstrated with Hard Candy that his talent is proportionally inverse to their age.Although Juno part of a good script and base an interpretation which gives the time, the direction of Reitman becomes invisible in that "wanting to demonstrate" how different is of great value. All ingenious script lies in the film because the address is allowed to give the leading role and opt for a construction of the film the invisible address. Something that, although can be seen as a recognition of the director to the script (in the purest style Hawks) also can be understood as a disability directive give this script a way that was also in line with the spirit of the film. We miss the audacity to Reitman in that aspect, but the film manages to entertain and look in the eye to a public tired of bland comedies with child spirit.
3,229
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1883
Lara Croft
La vida de los otros
2
5
muchocine
Its development is almost accommodating. It has in its representatives of the regime to characters that cause aversion. There is no contrast, the villain is just that.
Before the overwhelming majority of reviews positive heme here again disitiendo. It is not that the film has not liked, something that well was, but the lack of creativity to paint the characters. Made me a very long film to tell the history that had to tell and above all more American history of the films of the old continent I saw lately.With some exceptions, I usually consider the American film as easy cinema, for recreation. With this I am not saying that it is good or bad, each will have their tastes. But is itself a film too explained almost stereotypical characters and linear stories that for good or for evil seek to satisfy everyone.The lives of others has many of these characteristics. Its development is almost accommodating. It has in its representatives of the regime to characters that cause aversion. There is no contrast, the villain is just that. There is also a climber that exercises its power with arrogance and of course our protagonist who ends in love with art as it could not be otherwise changes life and his perspective on things.Always there are viewers looking for messages in the films, to all them perhaps sufficient conviction that all art it can, that the ideas are not killed and that sooner or later the good triumphs over evil (although in this case the triumph is something so alien to the core of the story as the fall of the wall).I read somewhere that after winning the Oscar for best foreign language film in Hollywood already they are thinking about doing a remake. I can assure you that the adaptation will be very simple, I think that only suffice to translate it into English.
3,230
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1020
Daniel Galindo
Quinceañera
3
5
muchocine
After a touching and funny movie halo hides a portrait (one more, it must be said) of the Hispanic community in the illusory Californian society.
The working class, the Group of workers behind a country, has starred in some of the best dramatic romances in the history of the cinema. If we had doubt of the emotional hook that have these beings on the big screen here we have the classic love story between two young Hispanics conditioned, not by family or social conventions, but for the price of housing. Forget it, is the story.American friends really like the end happy, extrapolated in recent years to describe happy all the footage. This is the slice of life in spanglish in the dream of a future better. This escalation was a come better maintains active parents, elders of the community. On the contrary Quinceañera narrates the vicissitudes of second generation immigrants, the wishes of a teenager born in United States but anchored in marshy ground because of the inherited customs.The protagonist dreams of his coming-out, logic between the americanitas serving 15 years. The concrete fact item is the conglomeration of ideas arising from this interesting work about the clash of cultures and the necessary assimilation of uses unrelated to the life we had traditionally been. Tape makers add to the mix racial tensions and a nothing subtle critique of homophobia and religious prejudices.In line with ' Costumbrismo ' with pretensions of titles like my family, when I left cuba and goal! It suggests ways as a social portrait. As entertainment product also works. Not we left the film with heart in a fist or malaise, so it meets its main functions. Perhaps peca offer us a dulcificada image of what more or less Intuit, but this is the price of making a feature film that like everyone, most.The Sundance Festival usually every year an excellent crop of independent court and, in some form, offender in form and substance. Being sincere, all titles not them perceive the same way here in Europe. This may be the case of this film that managed to join jury and audience in the latest edition of the alternative event: real feat or new marketing strategy? I.e. pass by the known contest, and I cover of glory or what is the same, free advertising. Judge you.
3,231
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2472
Emilio Calvo de Mora
Harry Potter y la orden del Fénix
2
5
muchocine
Harry Skywalker has returned to postpone ineluctables plans of fate, but.... (are pending libraries, hamburger and establishments in the industry)
Francis Bacon said based they have that science and magic tended to the same goal. This complicity was broken when the Science left behind the magic to apply as a more efficient method to achieve this goal. All that knew J.K. Rowling when it began the saga of Harry Potter. I knew that a magician with a wand child needed a fabulous props and founded a dazzling universe of train stations false, verbal charms to the old-fashioned and worlds hidden beneath the apparent with its formidable battles Vertigo, litigation and even schools erected daunting landscapes. Literature gave the go-ahead to the film and was born a marvelous franchise, one of the best views recently, billed with imagination and desires of pleasing the teen eye than before, with greedy fruition had devoured hundreds of sheets. And the film has found in the adventures of Wizard Potter a robust, unaffordable to discouragement, well equipped Philo of the usual round of tricks that will delight the épila, albeit without neglecting the patient assistance of adults, not initiated into the mystery books Revelation and unrelated to the symbolic alphabet of the universe fundancional. But we have reached the summer five or six, I do not know now, Potter was and the product enabled the circumstances is not dark, as it was checked by Cuarón, or complicit in these technical watermarks so pleasant to the vicissitudes of the magician has strengthened with no new pirotecnica which encandile the eye.Everything that once was basically clean exercise fantastic, vitamin rich characters, good articulation dramatic and overwhelming visual imagery has been now diminished, reduced to a correct, but dreary, cumbersome film of easy assimilation and easier still evacuation.Already the fact that part of the bizarre propaganda machine of the film trust your hitch with the public prepubescent or already lúbricamente pubescent a stylized Kiss Harry good plant moza accomplice of their mystery Arts it scale. The reckless Potter, before his magical brain sort the deserving dramatic chapters of his childhood, does not find love: what has entered its ojito is the carnal passion, the pull of hormones to muscle his voice and ensures that the adult Wizard has entered into scene for the greater glory of future clashes with the Unnamable, true spiritual mentor of all the adventure and, apparently, brazen plot remake of another series already sufficiently known, Stars Wars. Potter is a Skywalker of darker legend with his Darth Vader-family Fund, which draws as the hero to the Propp obstacles common to invest as hero or villain all the sidereal Lucas pilot wielding a spectacular lightsaber, only candy of children around the world, and Harry wields a wand of spells and incantations arguments. Logistical support is the same.Fascinate, however, some specific episodes: the scene of the balls of the prophecies or the majestic and clean of unnecessary barroquismos final match. Mention apart the character of Dolores Umbridge, a sobreactuada, but effects Imelda Staunton. Or a sweet and captivating Ivanna Lynch in the role of Luna Lovegood (of the pudding, Yes, with the face and the voice closest to the ether of woman who is Nawja Nimri) the creature of J.K. Rowling has yet bread that cut into the table of these summers of big screen and terrifying tails in view of that the next literary installment (half-blood Prince) for the brass bands symphonic in press and similar. It is at the bottom of alfombrar following delivery, start preparing personnel in new initiatory rites and lead them with estimable style and naturalness to the next queue. We will be there.
3,232
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4310
Jaime Martínez
Bajo las estrellas
5
5
muchocine
Movie Viscarret, offers us a return trip to the roots for a second chance, found in oneself. One of the great Spanish bets of last year and a movie that invites you to dream.
It was released as brand new winner in the latest edition of the Festival de Málaga awards for best film, director, actor (Alberto San Juan) and novel screenplay under the arm. Under the tutelage in the production of one of the great conductors and Spanish producers, Fernando Trueba, director beginner Felix Viscarret, signing one of the best Spanish films seen in the rooms in many years, and one of the great surprises (at least for my) 2007. Watching "under the stars", you realize that to the better is still a glimmer of hope to save the current Spanish film. The magic that transmits the character of Alberto San Juan (in his best role to date), the freshness of the Assembly, this mesmerizing soundtrack that transports you to the selfsame navarro people where the film takes place, and of course this unusual niño-adulto relationship develops throughout the film and which evolves to unsuspected for the Viewer.The tragicomedy that gives us Viscarret, smells that good Spanish movies before, but with the media now. And we have no because being hotly contested classicism and today if sign works like this. Viscarret knows how to insert humor in some dialogues that still making you smile you don't confuse and not fall into the easy laugh.The magic that has succeeded in creating the director in his first long work, and that magic wrap all the footage from the film without rest or a single frame is fascinating. This mix of everyday simplicity and at the same time film poetry that has the work makes this film a cinematic wonder. One bold and brave movie which I hope will become a key part of the future of the Spanish film.Alberto San Juan is simply sublime. Get transmit everything what proposed without just act. It has that innate ability to act in a natural way. Throughout the viewing seems a mere Theatre improvisation. With a perfectly defined character, San Juan sella which is for me, the best performance of his career. After a somewhat hesitant in "Days of the cinema", San Juan gives us a stellar performance, a momentous evolution of his character Benito through some superb dialogues (great also Viscarret writing the screenplay of the novel by Fernando Aramburu) where to find the perfect tone always between comedy and drama.Emma Suárez for his part is simply correct. The truth is that her expected much more from in this role, but fails to fill her scene wherever it appears.The girl, Violeta Rodriguez, is really good. It represents an introverted creature, by the lack of affection and care of an abandoned mother. It shows that it has fitted perfectly with San Juan, and in every scene they have together is overflowing with the chemistry between them on all sides. Encounters between Benito and 'Puerquita' are the best in the following between the two feature a subtle to complete in a mutual love friendship. The evolution of his character, and the complicity that this acquired with Benito is more natural, highlighting the scene in which both characters that are known. They do not need to speak to understand the game of the two eyes says it all in certain sequences. 'Puerquita', which is how St. John refers to the way girl loving, located in the figure of Benito the father that has both sought in his childhood and finally found.Finally, Julián Villagrán, which makes St. John's brother is claimed as an actor giving us a very poignant role mainly by his bonda and innocence, complement to perfection with his other half, his brother Benito.La truth is that unwittingly, Alberto San Juan obscures somehow interpretations of his companions, falling on him all the weight of the film and leaving not only graceful, but adopted with note.As regards the section of sound, Mikel rooms sealed a phenomenal job worthy of the selfsame Alberto Iglesias in any movie by Julio Medem (except for the failed "Caótica Ana"). A perfectly chosen soundtrack, and fits in the movie which gear on a clock. To emphasize, the beginning and end of the film, and the scene that gives title to the film, in which San Juan runs the way back to the people under a blanket of stars. Excellent music and photography in this scene work.Movie Viscarret, offers us a return trip to the roots for a second chance, found in oneself. In short, one of the great Spanish bets of this year, a film that invites to dream; because at the end and life after they are dreams
3,233
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4068
Silvia Giner
Plan de Vuelo (Desaparecida)
1
5
muchocine
Jodie Foster we have come lately to the jumbles and this film passes to complete its list of películas-basura, whose scripts we accept players when there are no better else to do and the end of the month we drowns.
This is one of those movies is I still pending to see and hopefully had not seen because its screening has proven to be an absolute torpor without limits.Jodie Foster we have come lately to the jumbles and this film passes to complete its list of películas-basura, whose scripts we accept players when there are no better else to do and the end of the month we drowns.The almost non-existent script, overwhelms us with a whole series of inconsistencies and stupid things worthy of a film series Z.La film is totally absurd, boring until the madness with a stinky cast, are going is that neither the soundtrack, osea, nothing, a real pretentious and meaningless garbage.It is incredible that a girl lost in an aircraft but less credible still is the development of the events. What thought the writers for God's sake?I said, nothing advisable.
3,234
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1642
Emilio Calvo de Mora
Sneakers (Los fisgones)
4
5
muchocine
A film that guarantee entertainment and where, unlike so many with more name and best critic, not enough or a minute. Or lack.
Sneakers or the snoopers takes place entirely in a chapter of novels of espionage at the time when the Russian spy and Americans were being monitored. Or it was upside down or happening both at the time and we will put skewers of tortillo tourists in Fuengirola. Sneakers is not worthy of a Clancy or a Forsyth material, but in cinema is a worthy example of entertainment with message, although everything is here diluted kindly thanks to the skillful layer of overwhelming commercialism that fills all the footage. Hide, however, a relevant discourse about the consequences of high technology in society highly tech and to embroider the joke, let us dive (without air, sweet bareback bottle) the responsibility of open one than another civic awareness regarding the Muskat argument proposes: a kind of decoder that accesses any computer network of the world (behold the omniscient God)(, the eye that monitors, the old theory of the demiurge constantly on alert by the barbarism of its creation).Sneakers opts for not apabullar with social ramifications: it wasn't Robert Redford then for messing the blanket to the head after the fiasco of Havana or indecent proposal, and here gets in the hands of a skilled director who puts on a platter of gold a dramatic, novel, film show where there is side of luxury (Dan Aykroyd)River Phoenix before falling to the ground sobrevitaminado of adrenaline, Sidney Poitier, Ben Kingsley and James Earl Jones. ).The script takes here and there until the mcguffin hitchcokiano us costs and can tell us the story they want because already swallow. The final inconsequential, that not knowing what we're playing really, but how nice game have had, (loosely) refers to games of war, John Badham, but are different films made at very different times even if they are ten or perhaps less the years that separate them. Thus the times. The writers of that are the writers of this. Case of Snekers had been filmed in Europe by European hand, we would have a more genuinely social Ribbon, a banked product exploitation of the political bis that arañara (a zarpazos if they could) the consciousness of the Viewer without either spending excessive rooms.As the film is made in Hollywood, rather than scratching consciences, it rubs, slightly plays, hedgehog skin with much tact, not going to be flaming fire of artifice that we have sold to affect us too much and we descreamos the system to the point that not him let the current as we have been doing so far. All of these signs are evidence of the direction the American cinema of the early nineties was catching: narrative shortcomings offset with verve and ex officio, with distributions of bells and (almost always) measured expectations.Today (again) times are changing. Bob Dylan said. And with its trogloditas Loquillo. And now what I say because seeing some years later gives extra information, a plus in purely objective kind, i.e., in the informed idea of what you are seeing is a good film, one good, really, without folds, live, endowed with sufficient charms to forget its frivolous nature in the background, although exposed cartoon has its miga and its nasty.
3,235
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3577
Francisco Bellón
El Atardecer
3
5
muchocine
The sunset is a sober and elegant melodrama despite respond to the clichés of the genre, not falling into the temptation to seek easy tear.
The melodrama is a rather special genus, is a very popular and almost all films of this type tend to be quite profitable. But it is also true that some of these stories working is needed a good Director who can maintain the appropriate pulse of the narration and a special group of actors.Sunset at least meets more than the second of these features, while there first more doubts, that it is the second film of Lajos Koltai, a brilliant director of photography, and if it is not enough to remember his collaborations with the no less great István Szabó. Based on the novel by Susan Minot, the sunset could be considered a typical melodrama, with a story that doesn't lack any of the usual ingredients: impossible love, remorse, errors, tormented characters, tragic loss the story kicks off with an old woman on her deathbed, and is in these final moments in which recalls his youth days, which marked its existence of life. These minutes are something disconcerting, because Koltai jumps without notice at a time to another, embarullando the plot and complicating it without, and Dizzy the viewer with so many changes. Luckily, the film acquired a tone more sedate and paused, much more appropriate for a story in which the feelings and emotions of his characters above all take precedence. In fact there are moments in which slows down the pace too much, and there are sequences in which do clear the origins of Koltai, because it seems more concerned to seek levels of great aesthetic beauty that by the appropriate narrative of the plot. But for the Hungarian filmmaker it must be said that it avoids the temptation of falling into sentimentality cheap and free; on the contrary, just signing a sober and elegant, moving and exciting film into perspective. Excellent staff of interpreters, who are largely responsible for the credibility and humanity of history, should highlight a great and contained Claire Danes, a sober and forceful Patrick Wilson, and a Hugh Dancy which outboard a character complex and full of nuances. Vanessa Redgrave, Meryl Streep and Glenn Close, it is not necessary to say anything, obviously.The sunset is a sober and elegant melodrama despite respond to the clichés of the genre, not falling into the temptation to seek easy tear. Lajos Koltai brings to history the serenity and tranquillity you need, while the magnificent roster of actors make credible his characters, and give the right touch of emotion to the tape.
3,236
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1206
Francisco Bellón
Más extraño que la ficción
1
5
muchocine
It is intended to be a comedy of height as a drama about human feelings, although the resulting product is closer to pure and simple pathos that to something else.
All the arts have been always interrelated, have always drunk each other for mutual benefit. Since it appeared the seventh art, it has maintained a close relationship with literature, not only by the number of novels or plays brought to the big screen, but also for the good of many writers, creators of real gems, desiring to be considered as formalized most of being recognized as pure writers.Charlie Kaufman is, and that there is no who can discuss it, one of the best writers of screenplays in the global film scene. His imagination have come true masterpieces, and waiting for his directorial debut, here comes more stranger than fiction. That despite not included your name anywhere, the original idea of the movie is yours, idea developed by Zach Helm. Harold Crick (Will Ferrell) is a nondescript man, which takes a gray existence, until one day begins to hear a voice that narrates his life. Was it Karen Eiffel (Emma Thompson), an author who is writing his next novel, which plans to kill Harold Crick? Thus begins the new tape of Marc Forster, aires and very literary aspirations, which has not necessarily a defect, as many believe. Since then, developing the idea initial, which could have resulted a brilliant history, was an arduous task, and unfortunately the novel Zach Helm is not the height. Signing a script bombastic, with aspirations of small great author, full of inconsistencies and plot decisions looming everywhere. Desdibujados, lost and stereotyped until the end, the characters are more flat than a whistle encephalogram. It is intended to be a comedy of height as a drama about human feelings, although the resulting product is closer to pure and simple pathos that to something else. The plot suffers several mysterious and unexplained mutations, because it begins as a comedy to then move on to the tragedy, to finally become a stodgy cake. If that little was the ordeal, the weight of the tape lies with Will Ferrel, an actor full of nuances, specifically two: of the personified hieratismo can become the best approximation of the evil doll. Emma Thompson and Dustin Hoffman met in their roles without disheveled, while Maggie Gyllenhaal, only positive point of the film, is a good interpretation, eating at every level to Ferrell. more stranger that fiction is, without doubt, a film of great contrasts, which will not leave indifferent anybody – or you love or you are, there is no middle ground. And if still doubted by which option we opted, we do deeply by the second.
3,237
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2499
Tito Chinchan
Flyboys: héroes del aire
3
5
muchocine
Film about world war I aviators. It stays halfway of a romantic story in hard times and one of flying action. It can be improved much.
There are inventions of humanity that I shall never end to understand. Am not going to list them all, with what I will focus on the Zeppelin, an invention that have always found me absurd for military purposes. As you get on the battlefield something full of helium that can explode easily? Additionally, only serving for bombing and had to go super escorted. That things as silly this of the Zeppelin.The film is about a group of Americans enrolled in the French air force during the first world war. It shows the training they received the pilots, as they were relationships between colleagues, feelings, etc. In addition to, of course, the dogfights.Buff, when the film found it me slow and heavy criticism will make me very uphill. The idea is interesting, with the first military aviators in history (remember that the aircraft was invented shortly before the war). But the development is very heavy, with many main characters who are keen to show us his life and miracles. The action scenes are great, recreating a thousand wonders what should be mounted in a flying coffee of those. But lacks finish, lacking in action and have too you much trash. Either that not sell us is an action film. They prefer. Very remarkable photography, spectacular, as the soundtrack, although this last will in tastes.In short, film about world war I aviators. It stays halfway of a romantic story in hard times and one of flying action. It can be improved much.
3,238
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4199
Rafa Ferrer
Habitación sin salida
1
5
muchocine
Sad, bad, pretentious, with enormous failures of script is ideal for see, forget show and here nothing has happened.
To anything today called horror film, honestly the movie is boring, pretentious, poorly shot, worse written and performed much worse, maybe the only good thing that has the movie was the news that filming the 2 actors cannot be or see that the film's story, and, as happens in other many tapes of this styleone is pulled good thinking of part of the footage as stupidly fools who are the protagonists and as you like, with some hatred that both give matarile soon better; especially when the story does not give for more.A couple that is on the verge of divorce are lost (typical) and intend to give a road Motel where it seems they spend shooting snuff film with the unsuspecting who sits there, reading these lines one need not know more than so infamous show.Or similar to thesis (already would), nor to murder in 8 mm (already would), nor to anything decent, where attempts to give a claustrophobic air, and all you get is more a comedy than a thriller horror that can give something of fear, and look that the undersigned is quite scary and easily impressionable.The soundtrack of Michael Fakesch falls into the common sounds heard over and over again on the tapes of this caliber, music that intends to enter by the ears to be scary, but is so like that honestly, it fails.Sad, bad, pretentious, with enormous failures of script is ideal for see, forget show and here nothing has happened.
3,239
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1884
Bloody Will
Sunshine
2
5
muchocine
All are saved are the special effects, and the performance of almost all stakeholders, based on extensive of his role obviously stressing Cillian Murphy.
Where is the tension in this film? Why I had to swallow almost hour and a half of footage to reach something minimally? disturbing?; I might add that final part of the tape is equally disturbing that return you less cents after paying for a ciabatta in the bakery in your neighborhood.All what you promised?Sunshine? in all the trailers that we have seen over these months it crumbles completely when Palm first of the crew of the Icarus II spacecraft that travel the characters in our story, in the future year 2057, with the laudable goal of trying to save the final dying of the astro Sol.Y is that this film is of those who dies until the pointer. And of course, that you know almost surely, with a minimum margin of error, in what order it will happen; most have a face of fiambre that sings in length.The case is that I have always praised the cast of?Sunshine? in previous posts, and I opt not from what I have said so far. Do is a good casting, some actors are better that others is clear, but thanks to their performances, and other technical details, saves this film to be rated as? forgettable?. I think that the problem is in the direction. Do so that the spectator suffer for what is happening on screen, and theme for the life of any of his characters, is necessary to start with a presentation? open heart?, i.e. showing removed calzón the virtues, defects, vulnerabilities and potential of every speaker in history, to make it more close to the public. It may seem that you know of chiquitillos.Only thus you feel their loss, and obviously so it strains your body when you see have death attached to the rear, and when eventually moving to another district. Well, Danny Boyle has focused so much on show us the beautiful special effects has managed for the film, that we care about a pepper who, when and how dies a character or another. Man, as the film goes on, you have more attachment to one another, for his way of dealing with the crisis; but to none you so llevarías your home or for a coffee.With this little blood, the tension of the film is practically non-existent. And when you see how the first victim of the plot, with the tombstone hanging from the neck, her espicha hardly interest-free, you you fear the worst. There is more tension in the meetings of my community of neighbors than in this film.Only a detail to detect boredom: instinctively I searched in 6 or 7 times a more comfortable position in the armchair to continue watching the tape, and the kid in front has stretched so much in the end credits that have given me wanting to find a bed that will lend a sueñecito before you go.And to make matters worse, the peak, as it is the outcome of the story, with a medio-monstruo as the final villain, is mounted as psychedelic (with scenes in slow motion ending in hiatus, subliminal images or unexplained blurs) that makes you lose the reference of what is happening. So eager to had Boyle do an apotheosis end that unintentionally you crazy.I said, that all are saved are the special effects, some very cool (some other props do you grace, as the Golden space suits which makes them resemble the crew who wear them a chocolate Ferrero Rocher) and the performance of almost all stakeholders, based on extensive of his role obviously stressing Cillian Murphy (for his portrayal of good about the movie) and Chris Evans (by his learned role of rebel).Ah, I recommend you bring you forth sunglasses to the cinema and her have at hand because the going to need.
3,240
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/805
Tito Chinchan
El ilusionista
4
5
muchocine
Entertaining film of time, that is original on the approach and even more so in the resolution.
See how we say this without us lapiden, but to me reminded me, saving the abyss, to perpetual chain. Ay, ay, ay, no me tireis stones, that truth that look like, and if not vedla and I say if you do not remember. By the way, that great film chain Perpetura, if not have seen, marchad video club urgently for her.The film is about a couple of kids, she a Duchess and he son of Carpenter, who want to live an impossible friendship in the late 19th Austria. Over the years, they return to find him become the best illusionist magician in the world and she in the future wife of the heir to the Empire. And between police investigations, unsolved crimes palatial intrigue incredible tricks and clandestine amorios runs the narration.Well, the movie I liked. My medium Zucchini said some fifteen times that it seemed slow, and some reason was, but to me I do not care. The performance of Mr Norton is fine, but is not the best. The tricks that are shocking and the atmosphere seems very sensible. The argument is not bad, with several interwoven stories, not of great depth, but let's film fun and entertain us, not burn neurons. And the end seemed wonderful, that needed me one thing, without violence, magical and beautiful.In short, entertaining movie of time, that is original on the approach and even more so in the resolution. We would appreciate that special effects are the fair and necessary, without fanfare.
3,241
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3895
José A. Peig
La noche de Halloween
4
5
muchocine
The structure of streets and houses, the geometry of Haddonfield is the universe of Michael Myers, and the superb staging (creates the stifling of suspense and horror without resorting to sensationalism hemoglobínico or the grotesque gesture) is the best expression of the attributes that define Myers.
On the basis of the iconography that commonly identifies the feast that gives title to the film, John Carpenter made a construct of terror rooted in a space and a cyclic time; Michael Myers, character whose ambiguous psychological universe is derived from the mythical halo that characterizes - almost supernatural, watching the conclusion of the film - and which is the look and the essential point of view used to explore the myth and folklore associated, in this case, to the town of Haddonfield.El icon par excellence - the image of the pumpkin approaching from the side of the screen - expresses the popular mythology associated with the uncanny and the morbid industryperfectly well–timed with notes, musical (work of the own Carpenter) thus constituting one of the most disturbing home credits which have been. Located in Haddonfield, in the night of the dead, the travelling and the subsequent flat sequence we are approaching the Myers House to describe the sexual game between two teenagers, game monitored by the movement of a subjective camera that comes to be the conscience of the small Michael, thereby introducing a reason essential in the story that subtly draw the tormented inner world of the protagonist: sex and, perhaps, the need of affection (which could be translated in misogynistic hatred). An introspective prologue that immerses us in the mind of the murderer, and which plays an essential role when Michael puts the mask on his face, and the sound of breathing is accentuated by the image of the plane sequence to acquire the subjective value that dominates much of the representation, prior to the murder. This is summarized (in a single movement of exploration and description of sensations and the environment) as an ambiguous psychology, some reason, a time and a space on those who return to complete the cycle.Fifteen years later, Laurie (Jamie Lee Curtis) is the austere and intelligent girl who embodies the antithesis regarding teen fashion and the first sexual flirtations expressed in his group of friends, the factor that motivates the murderer from the shadows of the interior of a car or from the hieratic coldness in the light of the day in the ends and corners of the streets of Haddonfield. The narrative explores the folklore of the rural world (space) in the specific date (time), the myth of the "sack man", underlining reason that follows a progression from the field of folklore, until the reality embodied in the presence of Michael Myers. Thus, the prospect of the murderer (omniscient, the consciousness that it plans to the crime as a consummate Act) adheres the perspective of its victims, in principle situated in the mythological context of a pagan celebration, to later face the real threat.As we enter the night of Halloween, the picture of Dean Cundey draws the contrasts and shadows in the streets and homes, the Hideout from which the murderer monitors to their victims. The structure of streets and houses, the geometry of Haddonfield is the universe of Michael Myers, and the superb staging (creates the stifling of suspense and horror without resorting to sensationalism hemoglobínico or the grotesque gesture) is the best expression of the attributes that define Myers.El Dr. Loomis (Donald Pleasence) - insubstantial character limited to articulate an unnecessary speech about the demonic evil of Myers - comes to the aid of Lauriethe only female that has been capable of disrupting the lethal attacks of the homicide, which can be interpreted as the consequent aggressive potential of the Suppression of the sexual instincts (and moralina the subtext that this entails). Myers survives the shooting of Dr. Loomis and his profile acquires supernatural range. In the final sequence, photographs of the interiors and the different spaces of Haddonfield accompany the breathing of the masked face of Michael Myers that extends to all areas of the geometry of Haddonfield. Myers is the soul of Haddonfield, a mythical and supernatural, immortal element, which cyclically returns to the origin, as we have seen in their endless sequels.
3,242
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2640
Francisco Bellón
2 Días en París
2
5
muchocine
The main failure of 2 days in Paris is the obsession by Julie Delpy in emulate Richard Linklater and her work, which to be honest is not that it was no gem.
It is ironic to think of the number of actors and actresses who in recent years have decided to make the leap to the address. Not by the fact itself, which is a natural step, but by the surprise and even indignation that this causes. Here we have Julie Delpy showing us his directorial debut, a story that looks suspiciously like his works on the orders of Richard Linkleter. The irony is that prior to becoming an actress, Delpy studied direction and script writing, and in these years has failed to financing for their projects.That the success of before of the sunset, including its nomination for the Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay (the own Delpy was partly responsible for), has led to the realization of 2 days in Paris is more than evident. It's a story with clear similarities and parallels with that, a couple as epicentre of the plot that wanders by a city and their emotional troubles. Such troubles become tedious after few minutes, reaching the audience a profound boredom which is difficult to recover. The tape is full of worn-out clichés and as expected adds nothing to an obsolete genus and endangered. Only the appearances of the characters of Albert Delpy and Marie Pillet (the best of the film) succeed in improving the scene infusing him some much-needed small doses of humor. Through the film, Delpy offers a portrait of part of the current French society, but fails in his attempt to become Paris taxi drivers their unique samples of study.The main failure of 2 days in Paris is the obsession by Julie Delpy in emulate Richard Linklater and her work, which to be honest is not that it was no gem. It will have to wait to be able to see the real Julie Delpy Director, in a more personal project and not a commercial commissioned as 2 days in Paris.
3,243
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2949
JohnTrent
La Jungla 4.0
3
5
muchocine
The jungle 4.0 is a good action movie, a good show without more pretensions that provide a decent entertainment to those who come to see her, but from there to pay tribute to her as the very best of the year, not.
Already almost twenty years ago was released a film called Die Hard, here known as die hard, causing sensation at the box office and creating what today we already know as a popular icon of action cinema. Its protagonist, Bruce Willis, fresh out of the successful series light of moon, portraying a police officer named John McClane in a position limit. And it is that while visiting a large building to see his ex-wife, the building is taken over by terrorists, so McClane ended becoming a hero and the only hope of the people kidnapped in the interior. Formulates it created school, coming after so many films that they based their plot in a closed place, terrorists and a hero that faces them, but almost always with lower results, or at least not so mythical. Only two years later came the inevitable sequel, which in this case would be new (and lower) director John McTiernan was replaced by Renny Harlyn, and step what happened, than Die Hard 2, aka the jungle of glass. Red alert, despite overcoming the first fund-raising figures give, flojeo of artistic results. But already in 1995, no less than five years later, he gave back to McTiernan by take charge of the saga, placing after the cameras of the third, the jungle of glass. The revenge, which became a commercial success and, at least from my point of view, the best of the first three. If there are people who think that something is already five years later to continue with a series, imagine that they must think the same of what he then analyze: Live Free or Die Hard, i.e., jungle 4.0, the fourth installment of the adventures of McClane arriving twelve years after the third, with a Bruce Willis already well entered the fiftyno hair and without showing its classic white suspenders shirt that will disfigure as it progresses each one of the previous films. Do it this last by age, or by a leap of costume to the character?. Do whatever the case, what is clear is that Willis is no longer the thirty years that I began in this action film, and that for any mortal would be a detail to take into account when it comes to pick up weapons, hold, running to all host, skip, Peel melee or? mounted in the wing of a jet fighter in mid-air and without pilot. Agreed, but in case this is not a film, it is not magic? Therefore ¡que viva magic! The plot is not something important, because basically tells us about always in this type of movies: very bad terrorist (or rather, than any other seems to come out of a Disney movie) plan to give a devastating blow to United States through the "absolute cases", i.e., a computer process that basically destabilize the country completely. Without giving many laps, called Willis quickly before it comes into action. The case is that, at this stage, it is the best possible option. Let me explain. If so first, without knowing anything to the character and as the first installment of the saga, we saw a police cincuentón and bald, quite crushed to be considered as the only hope for the country facing a threat as destructive, we would sound a joke, but those responsible know well that they play with a complicity by the fans, and that will make anything, or almost anyone can be valid without having to extend the presentations. It is why the fifteen minutes we have to McClane distributing estopa forcefully, and 1930s reached one more overly spectacular sequences of function (collision of the car against the helicopter, vista already so many times in the traileres). The good thing about the jungle 4.0 is that, far from losing bellows after those impressive first minutes, maintains the sense of the show until the end, although between scene and scene of action, the moments that connect them are flojillos, so it lost the pace and let interested what this happening, it blames also have on-screen to a villainplayed by Tymothy Olyplath, as such leaves a little to be desired, which intimidates not the slightest. Having said that, is clear in the jungle 4.0 what really matters are the explosions, shots, gaps of action hero which is marked an even more powerful McClane in the heroic sense that the previous (for what to be adapted to the new times, although the McClane always remains in the background). Heard shit of all kinds, but also many good things. There are those who claim that you it's the best four deliveries, a return to the height of the saga and the best action film of what it far this year. But also there are those who say that this is a hoax, a betrayal of the series and the character of McClane, who has lost everything he had. Let's say if I have to position, not I would be with any of the two parts of the discussion, because the jungle 4.0 is a good action movie, a good show without more pretensions to provide a worthy entertainment for those who come to see her, but hence to extol her as the very best of the year not, and neither of the sagabecause I I still staying with the third, although it is by far better than the second and almost put her at the first level. What the alleged betrayal of the spirit of the McClane character I think Dante soplapollez. Where do see those people treason?. What more has remained in the series in this installment is certainly the spirit of the character: his irony, his bravado and their tacos are still present every minute, and the only thing that has changed has been the age. If you can miss more blood, more violence graphic (and not so stylized), but it is what has the desire to make more money by producers (hence the rating PG13 in United States instead of the expected R, which prohibits entry to persons under 18 years if not accompanied by an adult)(, and a charismatic character who accompanies Willis, as it was Samuel L Jackson in the third installment, and here it is replaced by a more bland Justin Long). So, which you have not yet seen the film, and if you are fans of the saga, remember these words: the jungle 4.0 is action, only that. The to look over what I have commented so far, look another proposal on the Bulletin Board. Finally point out that the work of Les Wisseman, new director in the saga, and formerly architect of that thing called Underworld, is pretty decent, and maintains the bluish and gray colors that were already in the aforementioned film of vampires and licántropos, providing a change of look to the series and demonstrating that, in its own way, is something akin to an author. That if, here at least takes the best of his opera prima, the action, and elevates it to the cube.
3,244
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/512
Juan David
Waiting
1
5
muchocine
The jokes are not funny not even original. It is a bad comedy and worst of all is an opportunity malgastada to do something interesting and really funny. Do not lose time.
Perhaps not understood her... I had heard interesting things of this film by the disappointment was even greater after discovering that it was that kind of films where he is apparently going to happen something very funny and not nothing happens, one of the films most frustrating that I have seen and the worst thing is I do not remember having laughed at any time only spreads smiles from time to time. Even worse is the fact that has a good cast with actors who have made good comedies and that therefore one expects something more than half-finished characters and nonsensical.Waiting aims to be one of those comedies more close to the style of Porky? s, however alleged gags are not even original funny. The film tells the story of a group of young people working in a restaurant, so we have excuses to see scenes of fluids in the meals of the unpleasant clients, but nothing that has not been; Perhaps the only thing original is the game that practiced the characters that is mutually show genitals in a surprising way, however after a while it no longer has much grace.As I said the characters are vaguely written, only in the case of the character of Justin Long, a boy that faces at the decision to continue his life working in the restaurant or do anything else, seems to be more defined but not even that?.In short Waiting is a bad comedy and worst of all is an opportunity malgastada to do something interesting and really funny. Do not lose time. A star.
3,245
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3953
Iñaki Bilbao
Inocencia y Juventud
4
5
muchocine
Excellent film by Hitchcock, one of his last works in Britain, before embarking on the road to Hollywood.
"A morning appears dead on the beach a prestigious actress." The woman has been murdered with a man jacket belt.A young, from the top of the cliff he sees the body and descends to see how it is. Runs in search of the police and two women see you running away from the body. Calling southern while he explains everything to the police, they Lebanon you assassination, so dedice to flee to discover the true murderer. "Will help you, not without reluctance, the daughter of the Chief of police, which will be gradually falling for the young".Excellent film by Hitchcock, one of his last works in Britain, before embarking on the road to Hollywood. It is very good, cleverly mixing humor with the intrigue. The protagonist couple has great chemistry and both he and she are endearing and delicious.It has long and good humor, above all by the continuous dialogues between the two young men who are thrown puyitas full of irony and wit.For its part, intrigue, major asset in most of the tapes of the English magician, is well worn, with the last minutes in the pub where the murderer plays drums with the face painted black but its contiuos tics in his eyes, made by what can be recognized.Moments like the car being swallowed by the Earth in the old mine, the flight of the young of the police or the dinner of the girl with his younger brothers, are pure Hitchcock film. A superb movie with a title that could lead to deception.
3,246
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2750
Alvaro Oliva
Pathfinder, el guía del desfiladero
1
5
muchocine
With this premise, people may think that it will be a thrilling film (do with some traits of?)(Apocalypto?), but that is not fooled. On this occasion, the adventure, the battles and the epic have been somewhere else...
Markus Nispel presents an epic film, which could well resemble "Conan the barbarian", but that never reaches the category. I have to say that you it's a remake, which presents the experiences of a young Viking who is left on American soil and adopted by an indigenous family. After being accepted by the tribe, the boy grows up to become a warrior. One day your peace of mind (and yours) is cracked before the arrival of a new hour of Wild Viking.With this premise, people may think that it will be a thrilling film (with some features of "Apocalypto"), but they are not fooled. On this occasion, the adventure, the battles and the epic made elsewhere, that we cannot get in the skin of the character (played by Karl Urban), or move to the facts that we are witnessing. One of the few aspects that would highlight is the picture, as Daniel C. Pearl gives images an interesting dark (which also can take many detractors), that can camouflage the shortcomings of the script and carrying out a little, but dejan beautiful prints in the retinas of the Viewer.
3,247
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3304
José A. Peig
Eva al desnudo
5
5
muchocine
The dialogues are an exemplary example of organization, building character and sense of narrative, irony, laughing, melancholy, humor, replicas and contrarreplicas that leave us out of breath before the overwhelming dramatic force.
All about eve is a furious look at the world of film and theatre stars. Idolatry and the ambition to occupy the center of gravity in lathe which revolve the feelings, the need to see recognized the merits and compensate for the weakness with the love of the public. And forgive this emphasis, because the set of relationships described points to the need - so common and elemental - be loved, despite being part of a game without another rule to the manipulate others with the purpose of achieving stardom or staying in an influential position.On the one hand have a contradictory and personality full of edges that have an impact on the lives of their close to Margo Channing (Bette Davis), human expression of the idol, and, at the same time, it affects the entire development of the argument. She is the pálpito-antítesis of Eva, stir consciences and develops the conflict of a plot that is entangled in a choral drama where each character's actions expand items, interact and lead the development until its conclusion. Margo resignation to their status and, somehow, it represents the antithetical to the Eva's stance, since Margo attitudes underlying the desire to break the chains of the success, flee from fame to win love, leaving behind a mock youth. Eva, on the other hand, does not fear old age and will do everything to resemble his idol. Not hesitate to sell their feelings to win fame. The well-known phrase of Margo, has been very well, Eva, but I wouldn't worry both of the heart: you can always put that trophy in his stead, replacement of humanity expresses the vanity of who puts the hit above the true appreciation to their peers.Joseph l. Mankiewizc developed a fierce Chronicle on how a loser passionate about the art world ascends through the manipulation and foul play, to achieve his goal. He manages to synthesize in the character of Eva (Anne Baxter) two psychological dimensions; the sincere bonhomie and falsehood, a complex character that moves between these two lands until, in the end, faced with Addison (George Sanders), discover all their cards and reveals their weakness on the eve of a performance that will make it worthy of winning the trophy. The look of Mankiewizc ranges from satire and pessimism, links to the interpretive set through a smart game of complicity and mistrust, dissecting various records that make up the humanity of each character with enormous versatility. The dialogues are an exemplary example of organization, building character and sense of narrative, irony, laughing, melancholy, humor, replicas and contrarreplicas that leave us out of breath before the overwhelming dramatic force.The flat end is anthological; Multiple image expressed through a game of mirrors that synthesizes the struggle of egos developed throughout the entire film. Perfect image, ultimately, unhealthy idolatry that has inspired Eva in their climb to success.
3,248
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/294
Bloody Will
A todo gas 3: Tokyo race
2
5
muchocine
If the first two you you already hartaste see pranced in Tokyo is skidding. Your partner will appreciate you that don't think therein to accompany you to see her.
Film ideal for conducting film to your summer League and who know first that tí, films with emotional content and script worked, or fu fa. In the first ten minutes a busty blonde auction between her boyfriend and the prota for who win a street race to stay with her. It takes longer. It is thus easier to make criticism of this film as saying there are rows of seats in the cinema.Sean is a kid of Institute (do your interpreter Lucas Black has 24 years?) who, after getting into a mess of illegal races must take trip to Tokyo to live with his father and avoid prison. There conocero another type of car racing, rather more dangerous, where the Japanese mafia is the last to have the word.Translate the original title, Tokyo Drift, its literal sense would be "Tokyo drift" has been avoided in Spain. This is the movie, if the first two you you already hartaste see pranced and nitrosa injection, Tokyo is skidding, and this third part has a race between the bad maloso and the good Bandit is just stalling in a parking lot. An ode to safe driving.Not be if there in Japan is the card points, but only the protagonist must already be 300 points before the end of the film. The grace of the film is to make all infringements of traffic as possible, as if his Commission was a synonym for "I'm the best". If the protagonist flees the USA to avoid prison, in Tokyo he perpetrated offences twice, so well you would need a jail of those that went to Claire Danes and Kate Beckinsale movie.Nathalie Kelley debutant is Neela, the log that is metera between eye and look at the prota until that her get carreritas and spinning tops. Normal, being the sister of the malo-mafioso, a graduate in mathematics you won't.It was irony, to see this film must go plan of Homer Simpson: empties the brain and take a beer. Testosterone out on all sides, the script is null, and macho is as a film of pajares-esteso, but repeat, empties the brain, take a beer, and is the week peliculón.It has been # 1 on the Neanderthal Box-Office. Your novia-esposa - couple will appreciate you that you don't think therein to accompany you to see her.
3,249
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1046
Ramón Balcells
United 93
5
5
muchocine
The film more impressive, realistic, human, touching, brave, tragic, intense and direct for years.
I would venture to say that United 93 is the film more impressive, realistic, human, touching, brave, tragic, intense and direct for years. With so many positive adjectives you can verify that the film of Paul Greengras is not missing anything, it's perfect. As we all know, United 93 has the real and tragic story of the abduction of the 93 on September 11 in the United States plane. But, along with other three flights, also abducted by Islamic terroritas, he was the only one not to reach its objective, and all thanks to the bravery and courage of its passengers. The film, narrated in real time, is divided into two intense parts. In the first fragment the events occur from the point of view of the towers of control, terrified see as their country is endangered: the World Trade Center and the Pentagon have been attacked by three aircraft and soon discover that the 93 also plane has been hijacked. The second shows the events in this aircraft which all know their destination. This courageous proposal, carried out by the already named Paul Greengras (English director of authentic quality entertainment such as Bloody sunday and the myth of Bourne), is not intended to have the events of patriotic and sentimental way as insurance will make Oliver Stone with the not yet released World Trade Center. What he wants is to show us the terrible move causing such abductions for the control centres and throughout the country and at the same time to immerse ourselves in a plane full of passengers who know the fate that awaits them, and which therefore will fight knowing that fate will be the same although his enemies die: death. Not only that, but that also wants to, in general, show us how the world is today: into chaos. You would stress primarily, along with the direction of the great Greengras, the cast of unknown actors. Some of them are relatives of the victims, others interpret themselves (as Patrick St. Esprit) and others that simply did not know them. Of all of them, would deploy Christian Clemenson (which in the last minutes of his life speaks with his wife and decides to find out that they have attacked more buildings with airplanes, create a plan to assassinate the terrorists), Ben Sliney (in the photo below, who plays himself), Trish Gates (the blonde stewardess), greenhorns Jackson (the passenger of the CAP who narrowly loses the flight) and several others of those who now I don't know the name. But in general is a casting of the rightness in which they all meet their duty: create realism. The film is how filmed an interview with the camera on his shoulders (which makes perfect sense because that gives it a touch of impressive realism), and therefore with a picture nothing convincing (although lately several directors her being used in his films, such as Fernando Meirelles, Michael Winterbottom and Michael Mann). Technical aspects, I should also highlight elaborate mount and the wonderful soundtrack of irregular John Powell. This is a hard and cruel movie. In many moments puts you goose bumps or you fall a tear. It's purely exciting. The interesting thing about it is that it isn't one of those stories based on real facts that you have everything happened perfectly. It is not, because it is not known exactly what happened on that plane. The relatives of the deceased passengers without air controllers, United 93 would not exist. It is a film totally necessary to know what is happening exactly here, in the world. Shows you the reactions of people to such facts, the nervousness both of which are in the Earth like that are in the air, and it shows you a sense of immediacy absolutely descorcentante. This is a masterful re-creation of a few facts that unfortunately have existed. We have the most touching and tragic film (based on a real event) of the last years or even decades. Before a masterpiece.
3,250
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1109
Plissken
El truco final (The Prestige)
4
5
muchocine
A treatise on obsessions that move and even can endanger lives, but also a great foray into the world of magic and mechanisms, psychological and physical, that handles.
It is terrible to see a movie you like and not having anything to not reveal too much. That happens to me with 'The Prestige', the brand new film by Christopher Nolan, which adapted the novel of the same name by Christopher Priest. A treatise on obsessions that move and even can endanger lives, but also a great foray into the world of magic and mechanisms, psychological and physical, that handles. And also, a reflection on the art of entertaining and his ultimate goal, condensed in one sentence, which I am not going to reveal.Very convincing Jackman and Bale, excellent Michael Caine, Andy Serkiss and David Bowie, and Scarlett Johansson, Rebecca Hall and Piper Perabo reduced to little more than mere comparsas by the argument, but with some scenes of showcasing (special mention at the time bra of Scarlett Johansson, in which I seem to remember that also passed something in the film).Tremendous photography (Wally Pfister) and the art direction (Nathan Crowley & Kevin Kavanaugh), at the service of storytelling and not contrary, as in other cases.Only fat failure as a trend to the sobreexplicación that is beginning to be pandemic in world cinema, in my view, clear. That and some are confused and are created that the important thing in this magic trick is to discover more than enjoy it. A 8'5.
3,251
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3947
Francisco Bellón
Sweeney Todd
4
5
muchocine
The story moves to the rhythm of the bloody navajazos of this peculiar Barber (how not, a master Johnny Depp) and the tribulations of a no less strange Baker (an excellent Helena Bonham Carter).
The film remains one of the few able to arts give surprises, and if not here's an example that illustrates this approach perfectly. How can that to a declared no admirer of Tim Burton and enthusiastic of the musicals as the who signs these lines, nothing can liking a movie that combines both elements it be?Sweeney Todd, which we will refer to the short version of his title, is without a doubt one of the films of the season, and that sound with force in the face of the most prestigious awards in United States. Sweeney Todd is a Tim Burton in its purest form, adapting a musical telling the legend of a Barber in 19th century London. From the opening credits already note the personal narrative style and the powerful aesthetics Burton gives all of his works, and feels well soon that this time, blood that will reach the River, almost literally. Sweeney Todd is the story of a betrayal, lost love and his subsequent revenge, which is flavored by a few musical numbers of great wit and formal beauty, although the latter no longer a contradiction in itself. The story moves to the rhythm of the bloody navajazos of this peculiar Barber (how not, a master Johnny Depp) and the tribulations of a no less strange Baker (an excellent Helena Bonham Carter). The film loses strength with the scenes of the soft Jamie Campbell Bower, and a greater presence of the great Rickman.Sweeney Todd Alan would have appreciated: El Diabólico Barber of Fleet Street is the last great epic visual and aesthetic of Tim Burton, which in addition to the form, succeeds fully in the background. It entusiasmará to fans of Burton and the rest us comforting that it has left of childish tales and he has returned to this kind of gruesome stories, which dominates perfectly.
3,252
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/731
Tito Chinchan
Clerks 2
3
5
muchocine
Eschatological and absurd humor for this kind of nonsense Phanes. Those looking for cultured and intelligent humor that does not pass through here.
The truth is, commercially, the poster is shit. On the one hand, the five characters not hooked, the slogan is worthless for anything and these letters seem very cheap comedy. And if you believe that everyone has seen the one, are very wrong (damn, is that it is the 94). So it could have been something more currado the poster advertising, right?The film is about two friends, one journal and silly and somewhat wiser friend, working in a store for those who have everything. For things that do not come to the case, leave the work and get into a burger bar to work. The wise has a girlfriend with giant clitoris (like a small cock, joke of the film) and the other simply breathe by that has lungs. And make nonsense, they talk about crap until at the end is termina.¿Que what I think? Because the truth is that the principle seemed to me very bad, given that not him he got the wave to the argument. Later, when I I made sure there was no argument, I I relajé and laughed a lot with some scenes. In particular that of the Lord of the rings and the donkey. And as I have not seen the first, I came because everything new. It is certainly a very particular and offensive humor with conversations that may be unpleasant (such as the ass mouth) but I felt like a marrano in a puddle, the truth.In short, eschatological and absurd humor for this kind of nonsense Phanes. Those looking for cultured and intelligent humor that does not pass through here. I thought I meaba with a scene at the end.
3,253
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/166
Jeremy Fox
El caso Slevin
3
5
muchocine
The tape is ingenious, the original idea is good and perfectly fulfills the role of entertain more unpretentious
"The case Slevin" (Lucky Number Slevin) Paul McGuigan is the films that needed a certain complicity of the Viewer to be fully satisfactory. If one accepts the approach (what might be called "get in the game") you can enjoy the history while that if it does not likely will be disappointed.It is difficult to explain the plot of the film without gutting anything so I will comment on that history is a mixture of film noir with touches of comedy and some dialogues with spark. This mixture can mislead those who go looking for a more classic film noir (something type "Usual suspects" that we understand). For example the character of Lucy Liu, ready to investigate a disappearance of someone of good first, reminded me of the style of characters played Katharine Hepburn in "Bringing up baby" and other tapes of Screwball Comedy (bridging the gap, is clear). Even the villains of the function are friendly and somewhat cartoony.It is clear that if we have too many questions the film falls apart because there are some loose ends, which do not have much logic or elements are not well explained. The alleged great surprises are not so much if one is trying to discover them before they happen (which I don't do), and those that are seem somewhat improvised. By finishing with the defects of the film I would add that I think can spare you explanatory flashbacks which were not needed to understand the plot twists.So I think that it cannot be denied is that the tape is ingenious, the original idea is good and complies perfectly with the role of its leaders that is to entertain more unpretentious (what is welcome). It also boasts a very charismatic actors (Morgan Freeman, Ben Kingsley, Stanley Tucci, Bruce Willis) and others that are not so but carry out their duties (Lucy Liu and Josh Hartnett performed his best role here).As conclusion I will say that when I leave the film happy and humming the main melody from the soundtrack (a more than correct work of Joshua Ralph) I do not have any cause for complaint.
3,254
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2438
Rafa Ferrer
Transformers
3
5
muchocine
Since then that his script has more gaps and holes than any other film of similar characteristics, but well, you're the film happy with apparently and no other claim, if the script had already accompanied if that had been the milk.
We will start clarifying the tape there is no history, that the argument is so simple that in some moments raya the absurd, and that 2: 10 min. that hard, are just an excuse to get the robots when more time on screen better than best, sitting the bases and admitted everything bad in the tape, must admit (with the hand on the heart) that I I had as a boy child, and it is that see both to the transformers (those that enjoyed on TV in my childhood), as this action packed film, explosions and special effects, make that time which has lasted for the projection it has happened to me in a pis-pas, and the ALAAAAAA! I has left the mouth in at least a hundred times.Always say, repeat, and requeterepito, (ea!) that one can not go to see, with the same claims, "Transformers" that any more or less serious film tape, gentlemen, this is a summer blockbuster made only intended to entertain, getting 2 hours of footage to pass in a "santiamen" and we eat popcorn and we drink coca-cola of rigourwithout looking deeper (which there), or greater significance (which does not exist).The soundtrack, epic online that likes Michael Bay in his films, in some moments and closing their eyes, just listening to the music, I've transported both "Armaggedom" and "The island", musically speaking, is that epic chords and that characteristic sound, only appears in the films of M.BayLos special effectsbrilliantly created by ILM, and is that, gentlemen, in view of the robots, its transformations and movements (the fight scenes aren't so confusing as, for example, in "Spiderman 3") seem to as well as credible, 100% real; It is even easy to fond is with according to digital characters, a merit by the CGI animators.And last but by no means least, we have the interpretations, the vast majority of them simple, and where the only ones that stand out are Shia LaBeouf (which soon will see making company "Indy", Megan Fox, more than his "acting" I focus in its beauty, great body and big eyes, Jon Voight, trying to give something to her role as vacuum packaging)John Turturro, who has sincerely dose 0 for comedy, as well as Josh Duhamel, which I have not been able to off of her character in "Las Vegas" TV series.Since then that his script has more gaps and holes than any other film of similar characteristics, but well, you're the film happy with apparently and no other claim, if the script had already accompanied if that had been the milk.
3,255
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/108
Jose Contreras
Zathura
3
5
muchocine
Allsburg knows the small gap between the game's fiction
Chris van Allsburg already created another story from a game titled Jumanji, very similar to this. Also is the creator of Polar express, that I do not I liked nothing. Jon Favreau is the director of Elf. And the screenwriter David Koepp is the most solvent stocks. He worked in Jurassic Park and in several of De Palma as Snake Eyes, caught up by his past or mission Imposible.Dos children from 6 to 10 years stay alone at home, under the tutelage of a teenage sister. The smallest is an age-old game of Tin that works with a wrench to give rope and two spacecraft that compete to reach the goal. When you start the game its home is transferred to outer space. They don't want to keep playing because the evidence of the boxes put at risk their lives. But they have to move, they want the game to end. What most strikes me from this film is as confirmed by each of the rules that Huizinga found to define a game. But as each one of these rules is equally applicable to the game and fiction. The film starts with the daily life of the two brothers. The largest despises the small and beats all. The small hides in the dumbwaiter when he feels bad. When they begin the game the two are transferred to another space. It is playful space the viewer knows to perfection. Knows what is, knows that the two children are in danger. Those who do not know how to play, nor what the rules are children. This is the strong point of the film. The viewer anticipates things and wants to still the lucky ship, children are entertained in children's quarrels.The older sister is passed half criogenizada film and the other half sleeping. I wonder he paints. On the other hand the astronaut gives them the best lesson of history. Van Allsburg knows the small gap between the game of fiction. The game contains in itself, the fiction teaches us to know us.
3,256
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3965
Tito Chinchan
Los dinamiteros
5
5
muchocine
Film about three elderly proposed dock the mutual safe. Delicious and intimate performance of three big players in a nice history comic with dyes of protest in front of the bureaucracy. This type of film for taste.
Director: Juan g. Atienza. duration: hour and a half.Release date: November 2, 1964 in Madrid, cinema Capitol.Espectadores: 95 of human beings, which had to add was on vacation or was a commercial failure or the website of the Ministry is not reliable at 100%.Older people do not go in the current film. Indeed, even in the television series. And when they go out have roles or hiperdramáticos, or as much of secondary endearing or funny. So see a comedy where the protagonists are three elderly people and young people are nothing more than side, because it crashes quite. Even the rest of the actors are people of more than 50 years. How change the audiovisual trends. By the way, the great Pepe Isbert, always been old? I leave the question in the air.The film is about three elderly, tired of bureaucracy and the misery that gives them the mutual, decide to do a robbery as the films and novels. Shows how millimeter planned the robbery in the mutual that so many headaches has given them, until even the fruit of their deeds. Deliciosa.Este type of movies must see them sentadito on the sofa, very agustito and relajadito. Why? Because you must taste, calmly, without strain or stress. We just have to let us go by three elders, their sympathy-laden dialogues with his critical dot, to spend a very nice time. We will not change the life this movie, but if we are going to leave very tiernecitos, with a friendly sonrisilla, thinking that the world can be much better. By the way, one of the elders spoke with the voice of Alfred Hitchcock, but I think that it is not the official dubber, given that it is Italian. I guess that the so-called dubber would do likewise with this ancianito grump.In short, film about three elderly proposed dock the mutual safe. Delicious and intimate performance of three big players in a nice history comic with dyes of protest in front of the bureaucracy. This type of film for taste at home.It has very funny moments.Besitos.P.D: Anecdotally, one of the actors is called Felipe González. Nothing to do with the former President.
3,257
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3433
Bruji
Las 13 Rosas
3
5
muchocine
Martínez-Lázaro puts the humanism ideology to rescue thirteen names of oblivion.
Martínez-Lázaro performs an accurate portrait of the two Spains of 1939. Captivating from the opening credits, brilliantly performed, precise artistic direction and breathtaking soundtrack Spanish film puts the humanism ideology to rescue thirteen names of oblivion.Away from history books, small episodes human that comprise the so distant, so this war of 36 and its implications, have come to many of us in the form of simple testimonies told in first person, which is not always corresponded with what the film told us. Perhaps that is why the flat, nearly linear tone which takes the narrative of Las 13 Rosas, is, for the first time, close. The film of Martínez-Lázaro will always be history that rescued thirteen names from oblivion, and did it as it had never before addressed the Spanish film: by putting the humanism ideology, in an exemplary exercise in good European cinema.When a director decides to show a fact historical - clearly, impressive - so exquisite delicacy and impartially, without fanfare, highlights and colors peaks, it shows not only a huge respect for the memory of the protagonists and their families, but also for the Viewer. Inherent in the own period, indignation and sorrow, are eclipsed, in not a few passages, by the sense of continuous fear that characterizes the society of all dictatorial regime. Remember the recent life of the others, set in another country, different time, different thinking.Las 13 Rosas, as a whole, is notable for its successful plot approach, unfortunately, lost in the first half of the footage, showing a poor choral. Flat sequence not always manage to link the different sub-plots, by which they are introduced in a forced manner and at the wrong time. Mounting tape, captivating from the opening credits, seems now insufficient to show the scraps of five lives touching the confusion.All this, however, does not deprive of cinematic delight that produce many of their scenes to compose valuable documents. The intentional improbability of the opening level, in which some "bad actresses" encourage resistance to some few citizens tired that they yearn for peace, not must have been very different from that lived in 1939. The blessed unconsciousness of the youth and its powerful ideals trying to avoid the disaster of a lost war: "What is peace without freedom, without dignity?". The relationship of existing affection between members of the two Spains, that culminates with the repeated warnings that Félix Gómez (magnificent and impressive performance) dedicated to Julia: "You do not know how things are". Pain and powerlessness that followed. The uncertainty of the vanquished chokes against the joy of the winners, splashing of anguish and fears to the Spanish referred to them in seventy years later. The young Falangist requiring the greeting to a depressed town, that few years earlier was governed by other symbolism. The second part of the story manages to be transmitted with greater solidity with a single approach. The thirteen players agree prison for an unexpected path without return. It's that time where movie fan memory, inevitably, recover the figure of Salvador and the last death sentence signed in this country, to see the injustice of a cursed stage in which the murders that came in the form of attack - as any killing, unjustifiable - saldaban making use of the "red prisoners" tothen populated prisons. Nothing had progressed in thirty-five years of history. At a technical level, the tape get overcome with more than the average of the latest national productions. The overwhelming and masterful soundtrack composed by Roque Baños is the perfect replica in the precise and well documented artistic direction, the excellent photography of José Luis Alcaine, the work of clothing, hair and makeup. Neither the composition of the script performs Martínez de Pisón, nor of course the staging of a quarry of young actors that can give great satisfaction to contemporary cinema passes unnoticed. Pilar López de Ayala, always a step above, heads a cast that Veronica Sanchez performs the best role of her career, Gabriella Pession and Nadia Santiago give moments of invaluable interpretative beauty and the great Marta Etura begins to take off. The outcome, very decently treated, leaves a window open to the hope that pleading the lack of rancor. A message conciliator, collected numerous testimonies of the surviving protagonists of difficult assimilation, which is shaping up as the only one able to close wounds that are still open.
3,258
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2392
Oscar Cantero
Regreso al paraíso
3
5
muchocine
An invitation to reflection on the values of the human being and its ability to react and act accordingly in limit situations.
When three Americans are known during a rampant and initiatory trip which leads them by various Asian countries, among which are Malaysia, little or nothing could make them think its excesses and his love of the herb, could play them the trick which eventually saw them in a country that severely punishes the simple fact of being found in the possession of the same.Framed within the dramatic genre and deep philosophical ramifications, return to paradise escarba in the depths of human nature and encourages reflection on the limits of loyalty, honesty and the co-responsibility of the person for their peers.Joaquin Phoenix emphasizes on its co-stars with a character who although it is not the main of the film by minutes of appearance, is by transcendence, and dramatic merit. Vince Vaughn and Anne Heche, without reaching the levels of Phoenix, not clashing, and in general is that the work of the cast is good, as well as the work of Joseph Ruben to address when he did this work, I enjoyed the revenues and the successes that had reported the train of money and sleeping with his enemy assault.Great photography in the scenes that take place in Malaysia and the lighting contrasts that are used at certain times, work together to intensify the feeling of anguish that at times transmits the film.In any case, it's an entertaining movie and encourages the Viewer to reflect, though after seeing carefully twice, I still have the feeling that you are missing something; something that I am not right to define, but that makes me to stay somewhat dissatisfied.
3,259
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4378
Iñaki Bilbao
CORAZONES DEL OESTE (Hearts of the West) 1975
2
5
muchocine
Well-intentioned but mediocre film, where it is looking back with a laudable attempt to homage to a now extinct world of incipient talkie filmed outdoors and under conditions, sometimes precarious.
"A young man you want to be a writer of novels of the West, in the manner of Zane Grey, moved to the West to see in situ the Cowboys, Indians, if any, etc., to soak the idiosyncrasies of these good and honest people to admire both."However, his arrival begins with an attempted robbery by two malefactors. In their flight, grab them, without wanting to, money, so it will be followed by them."Meanwhile, meet people of rolling western cinema, starting a new life of extra".Well-intentioned but mediocre film, where it is looking back with a laudable attempt to homage to a now extinct world of incipient talkie filmed outdoors and under conditions, sometimes precarious.Through humor are seeing parade characters, some endearing, others somewhat jets that they disappear from the movie without leaving traces, and customs that might be curious.But all this under a television planning, with a direction rather flat, with a hyphen not too lucky, perhaps emotional, but no spark.Yes there are some good things, as the interpretation of Bridges, Blythe Danner, Gwylneth Paltrow mother (Incidentally, Danner in this film is the living portrait of his daughter as it stands now the latter), and wing Arkin as the director Grump that treats get even blood to their extras.No, has nothing really remarkable this movie, although at certain times contains a sympathetic humor rather naive, as the moment in which the good bridges presents volunteer for a dangerous scene: throw from atop a saloom to the saddle of his horse. Needless to say what happens to fall from great height to the saddle. "Omelet" in effect.
3,260
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/860
Pablo López
Pret a porter
1
5
muchocine
This film with pretensions of mystery film is the worst thing that has gone through my DVD player...
This film's cast of bells with pretensions of film of mystery (HA!), is the worst thing that happened by my DVD player. without grace, without storyline set, with eight thousand plots open, flat, stupid, incoherent, characters with thematic poor, uncomfortable, and blatant advertising with disparate lines of dialogue, with Rossy de Palma. It is that you can not get worse!All salvageable is, without doubt, Milo or ' Brannigan, the character played by Stephen Rea, a photographer sobrado, bastard, unscrupulous, cold blood, last thread, but more so than a Saint. To appear on stage brings some interest, a certain curiosity, go, entertaining, because the rest of the film, not even that.
3,261
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/877
Jessica Delgado
El perfume
4
5
muchocine
The adaptation is good, very good. But I think that some licenses that have been taken by the writers or the director were not needed.
"The Perfume" narrates in third person the life of Jean-Baptiste Grenouille, born in France in the s. XVIII in the midst of all the most detestable smells that may exist. I had an uncertain future, I didn't have much chance of surviving.It íba to entertain me to explain the plot of the film, but I will not. Because I have given much war with the book and the film. I prefer to discuss the impression that I have brought, I hope that you not bother that this time my criticism is that, pure and hard. Why it took longer to write it, because when I already thought to have it made, I decided to re - write it.The film begins with a scene that is situated almost at the end of the book, revealing a little filnal than him espra, or not, our protagonist. I will start commenting on my impression about the actors. A 10 for English Ben Whishaw. It was not an easy role, because before opening the film, producers already accusing the director does not achieve the olfactory effect won the author of the bestseller. And I think it borda.Another big film that outboard its role is Dustin Hoffman. Great its role as old glory perfumer, which takes advantage of the poor young "desodorado". Short paper, but enough to show it off. Reminded me at times to hook in "Peter Pan", another great character to which he gave life, therefore Baldini happens to be surprised by the young talent, to be sorependido to be delighted to end up being full. A repertoire of expressions, go.The young Laura is very correct in her role as "Miss", without wishing to offend. And it is coming from family well, everything in it should be correct. Thus, his character is just that. Anyway, I liked their faces of fear. Not all the actors know "be afraid".Found me the rest of characters, "normal". Not they caught my attention, for better or for worse.To tell the truth, yes I was surprised that the first victim was by accident, and after making a cast. The adaptation is good, very good. But I think that some licenses that have been taken by the writers or the director were not needed. And this is one of them. Not cost anything reflect the murder within the framework which describes the book. Like the second, I can't remember any passage from the book which explains how Jean Bautiste pays an prostutita to get to put the fat.Also I sorpendió that avoided that Madame Arnulfi was widowed, to dress in black and Druot was his lover and not her husband. Because, if I do not get to know the history, it would have not guessed it. It seems silly, but the author insists quite in that and how Druot treats the young apprentice.It is the only drawback (which unfortunately is repeated many times) in the film: that there are details that are not true to the book. And they are insignificant details that do not change the thread of the story, but make that adaptation away from the story that Patrick Süskind describes in his work.But that, only "complain" that have read us the book, because they do not affect the course of history.Although Yes it take less a scene writer reflects on the book in detail. And it is that when Jean Bautiste is in the mountains when discovers that it has no smell. But it takes several years to "discover" it. The writer entertains to describe each smell the protagonist discovers in the mountain, the cave or at the entrance of the same.Go down, there is no smell and this is evident, because they confuse him with a man of the mountains and even use him as an example of a study. I will not go in much odetalle, for those who are unaware of the work and may want to read it.That scene help much to understand why our protagonist becomes obsessed with the pursuit of its smell. Pity that they have captured in the film as something so temporary, for me is one of the most important.On the other hand, and having seen the famous and controversial scene choreographed by la Fura dels Baus, glad that I not caught in the casting. Not because it is not worth me, eh? But, not wanting to teach my beautiful buttocks, as they would say in more than one western.Honestly, in the book is very well explained why people are crazy of pleasure and is mounted a massive orgy. In the film, to the hear the comments from the people of my around, and after revealing that they had not read the book, it must not be well understood, something must be missing. Maybe Yes it is true that to see the film the Viewer is not able to "smell" that the director explains, something that does manage to make the author of the book.I can't find an easy task, the truth. Reading a book mind "plays" much to the imagination and is able to "fly" much and far away. Seeing a scene, narrowly explicit who is or by lot of information to give us, we are not able to imagine the same as reading the book.With regard to other aspects of the film, and leaving the script, "destroy" the affection, as say a friend of mine, I would like to praise the music. Chord with every scene. Really, it reaches pnerte tense when you have to be afraid, and produces you tenderness when you have to feel it. That is what a wait of a good soundtrack.The costume I found very detailed, very careful. And few special effects I saw, seemed very realistic. Because the baby was a doll, I hope. I suffered much in that scene, because if it is a doll to my me confused. And if it is a baby of truth, I do not know how the parents agreed that their infant shot so famous film surrounded by as much dirt as much as copper. It's a baby, man!In short, not her I destroyed as much as I thought it would. A Council, read the book before or after going to see the film, but do it. Will understand many things and in a better way. And you will enjoy the description of odors.
3,262
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/118
Yojimbo
Volver
4
5
muchocine
Almodovar returns to talk about women and turns them into the absolute protagonists of his story
Good thing about artists is that they may provoke loves, hatreds but almost always curious. There are who hates Almodóvar. And who revered. There are those who try to see his films without influence by the stir he created as a character (I might add, is a lousy). And without bias (although see the criminal trailer is a shock) I went to see his latest film. Do talk to her felt me absolutely wonderful and I did not see the bad education because no one had spoken to me well it, wanted to satisfy my curiosity with its Volver.Que stating that the best return is its title: returns to his earth, returns to his subjects always, demonstrates once again that you have music taste, returns to his actresses fetish? and the verb conjugará in future time that he will return to the Academy, will return to win Goyas, will return to earn international reputation?The film is unclassifiable, as you said my companion of HL (although the score do not share at all) I am familiar with the "manchego" world that portrays, why I see that one of the movie's weakest points is shuffle onto a glamorous Penelope Cruz the weight of the protagonist. We will, that equal parts is out of place and elsewhere get thrill. In fact, and that specialists may tell you me, cross is lit differently. Come on, as they did with the divas of Hollywood. Does anyone know the details of the contract of Pe as an actress? I remember perfectly when commented me the long-winded and complex which was the contract and conditions of Salma Hayek to put it in the great life of Antonio Cuadri.El most attractive aspect of the film is the "fantastic". The always fantastic Carmen Maura. Reconcile a story with that element (not specific more because I believe that it would be a spoiler) it's great and gives the film a without weight, little seen in our cinema. The actresses are very well directed. Lola Dueñas does a good job, as well as Blanca Portillo and Chus Lampreave (known to little and which should have been more comic).Almodovar returns to talk about women and turns them into the absolute protagonists of his story; do not hesitate to return to its "man bastard who only lives to torment" constants. The music by Alberto Iglesias see misguided, but it works well at times. Alcaine photography is notable and the Assembly of very successful Salcedo.A movie interesting, quite uneven in its pace and pretensions, but of the most original and personal Spanish current film.Without going any further, I think that the best analysis of the film (very detailed and spoilers) is Mambotaxi, fervent admirer of don Pedro.
3,263
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3268
Tito Chinchan
El número 23
3
5
muchocine
Ten fingers, ten toes toes, more cock and balls added 23. Rare is that do not reference this figure in the film. It is worth to see it, although you do not have big expectations.
Mother who streaked with the number 23 of the balls. Do you know that to Julio Cesar put you 23 stab wounds? That cruelty, Hey. Insurance had mania, by to give so many can not say that it is a suicide, even that was unintentionally. Well, and now when I thought that we have 23 pairs of chromosomes, hair like hooks I made. And you will say, what has taken the Tito to say these things? Nothing, my children, nothing other than usual, clear. What happened was that I spent the entire film looking for the number 23 on all sides. That obsession more foolish.The film is about a type that becomes obsessed with the number 23. OLE, so then you say that do not synthesize.If we quitásemos the film obsession that can generate in the Viewer by the number 23, would certainly be quite flojota. But has a very suitable ritmillo to evade you think things that add up to 23, or failing that 32. Another example, my pseudonym to write is "Ramiro grasses Povedilla" coincidentally totaling 23 letters. In two days I tatúo 23 in the front, good, no, to see if gets me some on the chepa screaming "To Plaza Castilla". Well, the film is very curious to see, but only by the anecdote of the 23. If it weren't for this, it would be boring, given that the obsession of protagonist fails to understand at all. And that to two stories in parallel I tide.In short, ten fingers, ten toes toes, more cock and balls added 23. Rare is that do not reference this figure in the film. It is worth to see it, although you do not have big expectations.In addition I'm going against my medium Zucchini, who said that shit go. Today I sleep on the couch.kisses.
3,264
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1628
Kamala
Paris je t'aime
3
5
muchocine
Best thing is that not all the shorts revolved around the idyllic Paris of lovers, but the real European city, with their problems and their adversities. For this reason, this movie made of minipelículas can be found some wonderful pearls.
I parí, I Parí? How many atrocities committed in thy name? I know that the quote is distorted, but who says "freedom" can be said "Paris". And who says atrocity can say "short-inside-of-a-movie-of-short".18 shorts in a movie. 18 shorts, but not all of the same quality. I did not know some of the directors (do something positive, because those who Yes knew not surprised me: the short of the Cohen, brilliant, but from the first level you know what Cohen of Isabel Coixet? great Sergio Castellito and Miranda Richardson - is 100% Coixet; Gus Van Sant, is unfortunately, Gus Van Sant? this man is on the decline)do, there who understands you!-?. The only one that surprised me, although it did not excited me, was Wes Craven. (One expects a Craven in pure State if the wheel in Père Lachaise!).Best thing is that not all the shorts revolved around the idyllic Paris of lovers, but the real European city, with their problems and their adversities. For this reason, this movie made of minipelículas can find some wonderful pearls: - the short of Walter Salles and Daniela Thomas, with a wonderful Catalina Sandino Moreno as immigrant mother; - Interestingly, the other Latin American, Alfonso Cuarón, also spoke of motherhood in his short, with Nick Nolte envejecidísimo; - shorter of immigrants: Olivier Schmitz is very hard and pure cinemacomplaint, of tenderness, of love, of mercy? - light, beautiful and hopeful is that of Gurinder Chadha, the Quais de Seine; - the couple Ben Gazzara and Gena Rowlands in a short directed by Frédéric Auburtin and Gérard Depardieu, and written by the own Rowlands. When there is talent don't need nothing more! - the couple Bos Hoskins-Fanny Ardant in a short that isn't at the height of his actors for his screenplay; - Vincenzo Natali short surprised me. Very style comic, refreshing in the progress of the film. That Yes. Elijah Wood doing the role of Frodo, once again. Very nice the metaphor of the "Vampire love"; - sad and lonely of Alexander Payne, which puts an end to the film. Is nothing out of this world, but it is a good culmination and a nice way of saying Paris, je t? aime?
3,265
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4335
Plissken
Rocky Balboa
3
5
muchocine
A brief history of back to the neighborhood, an invitation to look back and see how it has changed everything except the will of iron from a guy recently and limited.
Two of my first film memories are the cruel sea: one is the death of Bambi's mother, and another Rocky Balboa rolling to hosts with Apollo Creed. The first tragic event still I am not able to speak in public, but the second I'm more than obliged after seeing 'Rocky Balboa', the sixth and final part of this series that accompanied us during much of our childhood and adolescence.The fact is that each new installment of the exploits of this expert loser who was in 'Rocky' Balboa seemed to me I lost more and more bellows. As if it were a match for one of those killers that it relies everything to the stuck because they know that they may not endure twelve rounds on foot. What initially was a beloved and limited character was becoming a born winner, in a superhero who fought against horrible people who violated against their most loved, even against his country. After a second notable part, a third entertaining (and with 'The Eye of the Tiger'!) and a fourth in operetta, became a fifth that I took off all the desire to return to see the Italian Colt again.Then came the last time. And I did if people told me "it is not so bad," because my last memory of Rocky was Rocky giving a beating to a brat got Boxer (Tommy Morrison, which was by the wayside due to AIDS). But almost a year after its release, I find what should have been 'Rocky V': a brief history of back to the neighborhood, an invitation to look back and see how it has changed everything except the will of iron from a guy recently and limited.So Stallone surprises with a beautiful and tinged nostalgia boot (first thing that sounds is the great ' Take it Back' to his brother Frank played in 'Rocky'), half an hour that you reconciled again with the character (played by Sly way endearing and ducks). The story then enters a loop of redundancies and warm scenes (a training who know little, and not much more), which are nothing more than an excuse to give us the last fight of Rocky Balboa: a little gem of the sports film filmed in high definition video and it returns us the epic saga. Total: thirty minutes bright, last fifteen minutes bright, and "in the Middle", light.In the technical section, highlights photographic treatment (at times almost documentary) j. Clark Mathis, and the spectacular environment that exists in the last match (took a real match to shoot between 11,000 euphoric fans, including Tyson). Of course, makeup and boxísticas choreographies of the expert Stallone give a far cry from the unreal fight air with Ivan Drago, in one of the best filmed fighting in the saga. The music of the emblematic Bill Conti also brings its grain of sand.And on the negative side, a choice of actors something flojita (the two kids are indeed mediocre, and Antonio Tarver is a boxer, not Marlon Brando) and this second act that takes turns to an unlikely relationship.The feeling that remains is more sweet to sour, however. You know that already never again to hear Rocko terrible jokes, or the rough voice of Paulie, or the eternal 'Gonna Fly Now' with his triumphant fanfare. But you miss a lagrimita, think that that "nothing ends until it ends" is a truth as a fist of heavyweight champion, and you stay glued to watching the end credits to people imitating the most famous race in the history of the cinema. "Gettin' stronger!". A 7.
3,266
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2952
Rafa Delgado
This is England
5
5
muchocine
A recent masterpiece that we should not miss under any circumstances and that leaves in diapers and pacifier films - more or less - the same theme as ' American history X'.
' This is England', the new film by the British director Shane Meadows, shows us the lives of a group of brewers, revellers, authentic skinheads and lovers of good Jamaican music, to host a child of twelve years, without any kind of social relationship, and become you one of them. Everything is twisted when returns Combo, an old friend who, influenced by nationalist and racist ideas, try to sow hatred and xenophobia in the group. The film is shot in an austere manner that comes as a ring to the finger. It has a perfect rhythm that no lapses in no time, and the address of Meadows is exquisite in every way. The story is a blow emotional tremendous, moves to the coldest of men, and that touches on topics as thorny as nationalism, racism, and the delicate moments that went England in the Decade of the eighties, without falling into any kind of partisan discourse. The film shows successful and crudely, almost documentary, the personal consequences of each of the characters before the war of the Falkland Islands, and (one of) the political movements of extreme tendency that emerged by then. Interpretativamente speaking is a joy. All their players look as if it were the last role of his career. Thus, until the protagonist who is twelve years, Shaun (Thomas Turgoose), passing through an inmensísimo Stephen Graham playing the lunatic Combo (fine character: it seems that you're actually seeing a skinhead of "crappy", which caresses dangerously insane that Graham manages to capture with a resounding success), until the tiny group of skinheads protagonists. All are very natural, credible, and on no occasion outlandish. A recent masterpiece that we should not miss under any circumstances and would leave in diapers and pacifier films - more or less - the same theme as ' American history X'.
3,267
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3593
Andrés Pons
Luna de miel zombie
2
5
muchocine
The film has fun of good humour, some well managed scare moments or certain scenes well resolved gores but as a whole suffers from a certainly mediocre makeup.
The unknown DAVID GEBROE apparently charm I ZOMBIE and DEAD CREATURES by ANDREW PARKINSON and he told to quickly copy to see if I get the original thing. Since then the idea of the development of the ZOMBIE phenomenon decanting is by the drama of a disease already did so much better PARKINSON, therefore it got much more humor with a relationship through something akin to deadly ZOMBIE one of the few decent films by YUZNA.The director with a very low budget which oscillates the amateur returns with the same actors in his opera prima, the horrific comedy THE HOMEBOY that unless they put desire and are highlights of general mediocrity.The film has fun of good humour, some well managed scare moments or certain GORES scenes well resolved but as a whole suffers from a certainly mediocre makeup with little force in the development of a story which improves the end to an attempt which had good spirit though it is disappointing and is that not everyone has the talent of Parkinson's that if he saw this film is rare to not put the cry in the sky after seeing their looted ideas.
3,268
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/442
Kiko de España
El hombre del tiempo
5
5
muchocine
Beautiful, funny, cruel, sincere... everything is almost perfect in this farcical story. It justifies leftovers because it has been a failure in his country of origin.
The man of the time with Grizzly Man, The squid and the whale and the hills have eyes form part of my 2006 selection. The picture is spectacular, as well as the use of the Scope and the city of Chicago, a character more.Cage is spectacular and Mr. Caine and his tone of voice are more rewarding this year (attention to when listening to the song in the car) justified well because it has been a failure in its country of origin; It is one of the films of the year.Beautiful, funny, cruel, sincere. everything is almost perfect in this farcical tale of a man who tries to regain his dignity eneste (evil) world in which we live. It seems impossible that it comes from the same of "The ring" "The Mexican" or "Pirates of the Caribbean".The dysfunctional family seen in film that most resembles the father of family. Best film by Verbinski (probably his masterpiece), who walks with ease by the fine wire that separates the Tenenbaum Happiness. Anthology (and very Kaufmaniano) the journey in search of sauce Tartar and very interesting theory of fast food. Impressive recital of the cast. Another outstanding. 9.
3,269
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1704
Emilio Calvo de Mora
Hannibal: El origen del mal
2
5
muchocine
Maybe lambs had to have been silent. They have already mentioned much. They have been told too. Silent lamb, nice lamb. Or lamb with potatoes, but not cheeks. NI on skewer. Anyway... That already desbarra one...
I have yet to Dr. Lecter in my particular bestiary. There was an inargumentable Lair by this bad film bug. Blamed for a perfect Anthony Hopkins, above all. Just like the Hitchcock mcguffin in these stories of bad fascinating do not wish, in any way, dive in the backroom of the myth. It is not necessary to know what games practiced small, if you climbed the slopes to his cousin or if hidden, read manual of comparative anatomy with a principle of baba Chin to fall down. The mystery, once dead, is a photograph in an album. And it seems to me that this installment of the franchise has managed that: dismantle the metaphorical principles of the wickedness of the protagonist, tell us without blushing the origin of their phobias and their vices as if a pink Novella is involved and we pretendiéramos, in two hours, exercise of greedy public of gossip at a psiconalista meeting. Hannibal, the origin of evil, does not compromise the future of the series. The history of Thomas Harris has plots that nor he knows, but will open as HARLOTS procaces as soon as Dino de Laurentiis move the bag of coins and you feel in front of a laptop to remind us of the reasons for the Wolf, as I said a short story.Sobreabunda in gruesomeness: is arroba very dubious category of unpleasant film when we all know that to move or to make us shudder of panic you don't have write a M on the chest of a botched or burst a neck with equestrian traction. Worst thing is that David Webber, the architect of this mess, it took us for fools. You think we're going to be satisfied with four stunts circus cannibalism: that our fascination with capacity enough with a refregón of blood in the jaw of the monster future when (I insist) what you were looking for (and I have not found) is a coherent explanation of what already we know. Let's say that we have screwed up the character with a marranada of three to the fourth with so little discursive intention as psychological depth and that it only deserves to be saved by the setting (never marrada) and some simplifications in the form of telling us the story. This is A more B more C then D finiquitando her. We do not know at any time the underlying causes of their perversion, the birth of his dark side. The episode of the girl is not well unspoken (not desvelemos much plot) or not the revelation of evil as the ideal vehicle to complete revenge we understand, from the outset, rayana in pathos. I see more intent dramaturgical in the parliaments of Grissom in the C.S.I. Monday. This comic book justicialism not school: we have already seen many movies to make us become entangled so easily. And the reference in the silence of the lambs weigh much.And not everything is disappointing. One warns well looked at as a whole, a desire which are choreographed with a loose budget and a desire rather than sincere produce a film at the height of its predecessors which, with ups and downs, were worthy. As soon as I have time, I'm going to store my films and look for an edit twice (with many extras and cardboard box instead of the classic and cold plastic wrapper) the silence of the lambs. I there redimiré me. Come back to the simple appreciation for this cabronazo method that will go down in the history of the cinema as the deranged erudite, intelligent, attractive and fascinating that mother has given birth. And now we know it was Lithuanian and that killed a blast of nazi shrapnel on a cold morning near Kaunas. Oh, and that someone explain to me about the mask. I do not hear.
3,270
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3428
Andrés Pons
Venus Drowning
5
5
muchocine
Again without leaving the parameters of the accused director once again giving a masterful lesson in film sick, degrading, dirty but at the same time beautiful in their obsessions with poetry in his narration.
Unpredictable, brilliant, dazzling, imaginative or simply a genius with a camera, four hard and amateur actors out of the manga magnas works with the ease of anyone who is different or is endowed by the gene of the don to tell stories. Really exhausted me the adjectives to describe all the emotions that ANDREW PARKINSON gives me everytime he decides to bring out their enormous talent.If item ZOMBIE from a perspective totally different to the usual it addressed in his previous outstanding work, developing the phenomenon under the prism of characters that must face his disease and stop living as human beings to transform into monsters.I ZOMBIE and DEAD CREATURES merge drama with al gore taking advantage budgets almost amateurs to achieve surprise under some makeup effects, music, really excellent photography where the author did everything. Repeating with some interpreters of his previous works makes the ZOMBIE phenomenon of side to immerse themselves in a monstrous relationship that seems directly out of the head of the once terrifying DAVID CRONEMBERG.Again without leaving the parameters of the accused director once again giving a masterful lesson in film sick, degrading, dirty but at the same time beautiful in their obsessions with poetry in his narration.We complain about the lack of ideas of current terror, because while in theaters triumphs SAW 4, other European authors take wonders type NEXT DOOR or DEAD CREATURES while anyone to repair them, hopefully this film arrives one day at least in DVD because in cinemas so I do see impossible.
3,271
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2468
Oscar Cantero
Harry Potter y la orden del Fénix
3
5
muchocine
The film dark, bleak and gloomy in the series, in which the cortidiana life is gaining ground to the magic.
Little promotion today need the Harry Potter films. The trajectory of their previous deliveries and the excitement generated by each book that J.K Rowling published adventures of the young Wizard, claim they are more than enough to ensure the success of the movies in which Daniel Radcliffe plays one of the most important fictional characters of the whole history.With a hyphen tremendously complex, marked by the need to condense the denser of the books in the shortest film of the boulders up to now, Harry Potter and the order of the Phoenix, is undoubtedly the film more dark and dark in throughout the series, with an almost total lack of open scenarios and a clear evolution of the charactersthat they cease to be children to become adolescents.David Yates, who has been in charge of directing this installment, has stripped the characters from much of its charm, turning them into something grey beings and no time for trivial conversations and jokes. On the contrary, on this occasion, the Affairs of the earthly life, non-magical, to call it somehow carry more weight in the plot. In any case, is a good film, which although perhaps not reached the height of its predecessors, will delight fans of the young Potter, among which I must confess I find. Because to think otherwise, the Harry Potter films are not appropriate for children; or much less.
3,272
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3652
Andrés Pons
Psychophobia
3
5
muchocine
In the world of amateur short film many kids without a budget but with a terrible desire to experience tend to entertaining products.
In the world of amateur short film many kids without a budget but with a terrible desire to experience tend to entertaining products.ZIRCONIUM 77, FLUFF films or bad attitude among many others engaged in terrorizing the staff with many ideas and a desire to have fun.BLOGS as my dear terror and nothing else they do give small recognition they deserve which I gladly I said.I just saw a small wonder of friends of VINCENT films that in the case of the SLASHER of the whole life they give an attractive approach after the good use of space and a good staging.Great soundtrack, a frenetic montage for an entertainment shot with young people full of energy shamelessness.Obviously I will not criticize his lack of technical effects because photography or make-up are non-existent, but let us not forget that it's productions of zero budget with amateur people who just try to have fun.Anyway I think that they should improve the sound that many sentences are left out making it difficult to follow the plot.Let us hope that VINCENT films continue to improve their performance because they promise. I will be to tell.
3,273
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2042
Jose Contreras
Zodiac
3
5
muchocine
This turn of Fincher is not stylistic. It is not containment, but rigour. I am collecting, as always, the abuse of pampered managers of the industry, which owned the system, sent on producers and refuse to accept the necessary scissors.
«The time has taught me some tricks: avoid synonyms, which have the disadvantage of suggest imaginary differences;» prefer the usual words to the amazing; Insert in a story circumstantial traits; simulate small uncertainties, that if reality is accurate memory is not; telling the facts (this I learned of Kipling and Iceland sagas) as if not understand them at all; Remember that the previous rules are not obligations and that the time will abolirlas.» Borges is in his foreword to "Praise of folly".The prose of Borges is full of hesitation. They serve as he says, to simulate the memory which is imprecise. But not the reality that is accurate, but to the imagination that is always assertive.I quote Borges to inform Fincher. After Seven, Fight Club, panic room, wheel a documentary about the impossibility of knowing who was a serial killer of the 1970s. Away from the Symmetries of Seven Fincher consists a circular work where the same subject of the impossible of a killer search returns over and over again throughout a life which, in a background, is composing stages of a story: courtship, marriage, separation, and in the Centre, the case.I guess that this turn of Fincher is not stylistic. Was it imposed its material: years of research, suspects who could never sit on the bench. Fincher does not give the Viewer none the agrados promises to fiction, punishment, the solution of an enigma, the culmination of a search, because you can not give them. It is not containment, but rigour. Not find, however, mastery of which I speak. I am collecting, as always, the abuse of pampered managers of the industry, which owned the system, sent on producers and refuse to accept the necessary scissors. 170 minutes had also done dent in Casablanca.
3,274
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2790
Rafa Ferrer
Escucha mi voz
1
5
muchocine
The history and all the plot, is made to sell Duff discs like hotcakes, and is that we should not forget that the Duff Empire stretches not only movies, but also to the disks and even diverse merchandising of the this girl.
Let's start with that Hillary Duff, like Lindsay Lohan, Paris Hilton, or to a lesser extent Britney Spears, I fall like a kick in the face, so, I repeat, taking advantage of that this week I'm going to bed nearly with the Lunnis, my wife explores (and exploited) the genre of the romantic comedy in its most distressing aspects.Hillary, here acts as a "girl singer" (long before that operation of face which has left with a face, acojonantemente stretched), recalling some moments to our homeland with an argument, Marisol dramatic theoretically and stand where along with Hillary out, Rita Wilson (wife of Tom Hanks and usual producer of countless films) that should get bored at home, Rebecca DeMornay, who did years ago its figure of Lady Sexy film (something so as Sharon Stone, but in version Hippy), David Keith, secondary on countless films ago here of father of the Duff.La history and the plot is made to sell Duff discs like hotcakes and is that we should not forget that Empire Duff (talk not about the brand of beer Simpsons)(, although it is inevitable to see the name and think Duffman), stretches not only movies, but also to the disks and even diverse merchandising of the this girl.
3,275
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2903
Jeremy Fox
Piratas del Caribe: En el Fin del Mundo
2
5
muchocine
It is clearly the worst of the three adventures but this is not, or should not, no surprise.
This is one of those projects that have never interested me too much. The huge opportunities lost as a result by previous deliveries had removed any possible interest in seeing how remataban slaughter.If above, we add the terrible criticism, even from fans of the previous chapters, we have the causes of my tardiness in pay the entrance fee to see the film. But at the end, I decided to. “ Caribbean Pirates: at the end of the world ” is clearly the worst of the three adventures but this is not, or should not, no surprise. Because, at the risk of repeating myself, I have to say that it has the same defects and the same virtues than its predecessors. The problem is that defects appear here more accentuated and the virtues are less noticeable.Continues to be Johnny Depp the best function although her character begins to be somewhat tiresome at times. To such an extent they knew those responsible without Depp there is no film that, despite how it ended the previous delivery, does not take nor a sigh to appear on it. The rest of the characters are mere comparsas and painful to see how wasted actors such as Geoffrey Rush, Jonathan Pryce and Stellan Skarsgård. the script remains almost non-existent, with fairly empty dialogues and even ridiculous; a mere excuse to create situations that require visual effects, that itself, spectacular. Not stories finish well off, disappearing characters without saying or m3u and it gives us one of the endings more tontitos recent history. And that if one gets to see the credits at the end, which I always do, but those who have stayed only to see that scene have since emerged from the room with a monumental anger.Again the confusion between dramatic and spectacular is the Queen of the function. And it is because, in reality, the tape does not have too many scenes of action, adventure or drama or comedy … its great merit is that, not offering virtually nothing, get that their two hours and three quarters is not excessively long. But that is a very small achievement for a film that was intended to be much, much more.Final evaluation of moonfleet.es: 4 out of 10.
3,276
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/420
Natalia Eseverri
Alatriste
3
5
muchocine
I do not know if with another director's vision had come to enjoy more, but if I was lacking that spark of seeing something spectacular and at the same time have reflected to the Spain of that century.
My recommendation is one of the films most anticipated of the year which has also been able to count with the largest budget that has been granted to a Spanish film.The truth is that I really liked, much respected all the details of the book of Perez Reverte and I believe that the work of the director, Diaz Yanes, in gathering the most important arguments of the three books in the film has reflected great. The landscapes and the work of rebuilding the 17th century Spain has been an outstanding job to which I can not get any hits and also with any touch could also be reflected in some of the paintings of the time, a perspective that has seemed quite original.In history, tells us the life of Diego Alatriste, is not a film with beginning, intermediate, and final as the usual let's see. Narrates his adventures in various battles and at the same time looking at people of her around and also the lives of each one of them, but always focusing on Alatriste as main character. Not be if it is something appropriate to have focused so or on the contrary have sought a story the protagonist that easily could have continued, but guess that try to include important details of the three books, the only way to achieve this was so. To my at least gave me that impression and I see it right.But the essential, although repeat a lot but it is truth is Viggo Mortensen Alatriste, also without any shred of doubt. You see even in their manner of walking, have you got an extremely complicated character and he has it carried its terrain with ease. He and his magnificent interpretation is based that the movie will work.And now comes to me has been able to crash the movie and if it is true that it tells the Spain of the 17th century and as Diaz Yanes said, tells it you better than a school history book, also it's truth that tell in the way that has done it much loses the rhythm of the film and sometimes makes you weary and also tell a story of the Spain without having that reach the roots but also have to think a little in the viewer and offer something to make you enjoy the movie, because my feeling to leave has been to see a good film but without reaching excite me. I do not know if with another director's vision had come to enjoy more, but if I was lacking that spark of seeing something spectacular and at the same time have reflected to the Spain of that century.In any case, in addition to Mortensen, want to highlight many of the side of the film that although they had very few papers have been able to give their own personality and they were fantastic, especially Javier House as count Duke of Olivares and Juan Echanove as Quevedo. In films of this kind should highlight the artistic direction and costumes because they are that more is it curran and his work have made perfect in "Alatriste". Note the very exquisite taste that they have had in choosing both scenery and costumes of each of the characters and that is to be welcomed.And not is because gives me that we are going to hear much Alatriste in the upcoming Goya. I, without hesitation, gave it to Mortensen.
3,277
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2497
Berto
Hostel 2
4
5
muchocine
The conclusion reached after see it, is that it is a film very good and quite strong, not suitable for cardiac? If you like strong emotions, I recommend that you go to see her.
My article today it is the turn to one of horror film produced by Quentin Tarantino and directed by Eli Roth, his title is Hostel 2. Well Hostel 2 is a film that impresses, and much, there are substantial scenes very stunning and impressive. It has an argument that goes on the same line of the first "Hostel" film, but quite unpredictable, or at least to my I was surprised on several occasions, and I believe that the argument you surprise to you also, personally prefer the argument of "Hostel 2" to the first part. In general it is best Hostel 2 film than Hostel. To give you an idea of how is this film I recommend that you see the poster were made for this occasion? are they worth seeing?The film begins with the murder of the only survivor of the Group of guys that went to Slovakia in the first film and the delivery to the leader of the club of hunting of the head of the boy from that point we could say that the relationship that may exist with the first film disappears. In this new installment, there are three girls who attend Slovakia deceived by another girl encountered while they were on a train. Does this time just as in the first film only one survives, that if not tell you or who survives, or how to survive, not because survives? all these data must discover them for yourselves watching this piece of film.The conclusion reached after see it, is that it is a film very good and quite strong, not suitable for cardiac? If you like strong emotions, I recommend that you go to see her. I also would encourage those who have not seen "Hostel" to that see, if you like the horror films Saw type, you are probably like you, and as a moral not go to Slovakia just in case?
3,278
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3497
Emilio Calvo de Mora
Piratas del Caribe: En el Fin del Mundo
2
5
muchocine
More of the same, and it will three.
There are franchises, more than pelícuasl, we confinamos to indolence: laziness apathy to remind them, see, but who went caught up in jubilation, recognizable in the guise of greedy consumers of adventures, with three screaming and popcorn cinema rows above. Hollywood has its most significant income in this chapter of sale but not the most seminal. Pirates of the Caribbean: At the end of the world relates to this already tired formula of exploiting ad nauseam the baptismal benefits of the product, that is, the fresh and appetizing first installment. Because this Jack Sparrow, Hector Barbosa, Davy Jones or the here revitalized Will Turner and the cohort of Bivalves, agusanados spectra with right to Parliament and mother-of-Pearl eyes that open portals to unknown dimensions is not anything other than a product, one of prodigious invoice and appalling technical means. So far all right: popcorn, pirates, treasures, tentacles and colors to galore. Music not at odds and the figure beloved Captain Sparrow's already well accommodated in the freak of certain generations, Avid heroes of the modern cartoon, characters subject to the marketing and merchandising ad hoc Vertigo. In addition to all this, the tape entertains, missing more, but not as much as it should (at a glance).That entertainment plus takes it before your dedicated operators deploy the magnificent props and get into some laboratory high-tech so that millions of white crabs move a boat by the sand of the desert, which is (by far) the best scene of the tape and almost the complete series, at least for this already talludito chroniclerOf course.Not can one go to the cinema with the certainty that is going to have a bad time. In any case, unless we have the age of my son (10 years) going to lose - that with a small mouth - two hours of our always precious time, we could well have consecrated to admire the granitic purity of the Bogart of his best black series of 1940s or the Magisterium by Siodmak in turning a vulgar melodrama of fumetti (only heaven knows it)(, Imitation of life) in a dramatic prodigy worthy of the best classics. But we do not desabarremos and return to the nervous crab and deception filibuster, the slippery script and the (burdensome) excessive accumulation of branching stories that ultimately impedes an easier understanding of the primary narrative material. And after all, we have a movie made for teenagers. Or is not really so?The meritorious fascination of images override all lowercase reluctance. There are scenes of a breathtaking plasticity, worthy survive in the memory of moviegoers without prejudices and less demanding public, in general. I would like to (and sometimes costs, I know) be spectator more easy happy. The ship in the sand, the sampán flying between stars or the condemned souls that sail in "chalupas" a dark sea of ululantes omens and wonderful mysteries, dialogue with the living, are pastillitas with hear on this lengthy collection of patchwork that just, for work of a lit editor and a certainly responsible direct, in a passable filmdiscreetly passable, when (at the sight of the herein and felt) might be a monumental roll, an affront to the adventure film and a discredit to the intelligence of these adolescents who religiously pay a good handful of euros that industry (that cuasifantasmagórico body) will shape the imagination and build them, in the absence of Julio Verne, Robert Louis Stevenson or Emilio Salgarian accessible inventory of heroes.The great machinery of special effects and humor go to trompicaba genuine and playful the arguments of the previous installments here dwindles outrageously. There is no continuity, but some complicity. Those who have not seen these tapes very bad lead him to get into the skin (scabs and pustules, if you prefer) of it. It was perhaps my case. I got lost in the story and had to be rescued several times to reconnect with the plot and get away at the end, so happy always.Identification with the characters (any child or juvenile literature of quality Foundation) loses the bellows of yesteryear. Sparrow, the humorous and bufonesco captain, has been blurred and no longer of that profile hooligan, histrionic and loquacious and up the damsel of rank that becomes a pirate who plays sosamente Keira Knightley is lost, despite his WAD of lines in a ragbag plot, in excessive with the story that the forge and debt reduced to a fractured compendium of solvents sketches, but inevitably boring.There is a will of sophistication that annuls the primary mechanisms of the film pirates, impregnating the set of a perhaps unwise trend the grandiose spectacle without addressing the basic spirit of things, some simplicity highly desirable to excite, not overwhelm, to entertain without breaking the patience of the Viewer.The trilogy here completed his journey by box office and Windows of toys. Commercial exploitation does not terminate: the pirate continues its journey in the seas of the gain and the forging of a myth. The epics now operate differently: belong to languages less lyrical, although of a strength plastic brutal, devoid of references solid and based on literary models of height, sustained in entangled intrigues that strangle the fluidity of the frame and obstruct any possibility of true enjoyment.Last mention and separate mention is the disturbing presence of the legendary guitarist of the Rolling Stones, Keith Richards, who came to the set of filming drunk and little ductile to be carried away by the orders of the director. What they wanted?
3,279
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3587
Ana Belén Pacheco
Despues de Medianoche
3
5
muchocine
It will please lovers although no end of Excite.
The narrator of this film says that sometimes the story her without the characters, do the landscapes, places. Somehow after watching after midnight is not obliged to give the reason already to Turin, and more specifically the Mole (the Museum of the cinema) a place that seems so magical that any film buff has the need to visit it from the moment that appears on screen for the first time.While I don't agree with experiments of target film in this case I transijo and praise the narration and the ornaments of classic film, Keaton scenarios and corsets of Marilyn Monroe. So curious place develops this tale of love and heartbreak with form of love triangle where Martino, (Giorgio Pasotti, the last Kiss) uncomfortable night guardian of the Museum who lives in the world of silent film with their routines until Amanda just invading his space fleeing from the police after an incident with her boss. The third in discord is Angelo (Fabio Troiano), her official boyfriend but a conflicting type and some badass whose only known work is to steal cars and flirt indiscriminately. Amanda has to hide with Martino and thus will discover the beauty of the Mole and the world of cinema. The Viewer is a sponge that absorbed the beauty of the mind of Martino and the doctrinatica information of his Narrator while the facts are inevitably directed at midnight.It will please lovers although no end of Excite. And as the narrator says: films just but the film ends not never. THE movie data: Won the Caligario award at the Berlin Film Festival recently presented during the international week of film of Valladolid 2004 within the meeting point section.
3,280
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/4266
Rafa Delgado
Monstruoso
3
5
muchocine
It is really entertaining and know create tension in the Viewer, but more based lightning and Thunder that no script.
The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 in New York marked a before and then in all the senses, that there no doubt. The infamous war of Viet Nam was the first unfortunate event in broadcast almost in direct on televisions around the world, but the boom in communications at the end of the 20th century and the way in which lived the nightmare and unfortunate attacks against the twin towers, radically changed the concept. Now everyone had the power to immortalize a moment at your fingertips: video cameras of all types, digital cameras that allow recording of video, mobile phones with camera. Therefore, when the whole world saw how over three thousand people were killed brutally live and live, while New York widespread panic, which were closer to the event not bowed to stay in front of the TV, but grabbed their cameras, took to the streets, and began recording.From this very personal point of view, the new creation of producer j. j. Abrams, Cloverfield is threatened. A disaster on a large scale from the point of view of one of those people that run to save his own life, and the most loved. Abrams wanted to recreate the atmosphere of sadness and confusion to a disaster as Dantesque as the 11-S in his new film. This new "" audiovisual culture that not only he explodes, but the vast majority of television news and news programmes, not to say all have realized that something with potential, and above all is a macabre morbid, it sells. The "we are live" to a monumental disaster.But fortunately Cloverfield is fiction, and narrates the "typical" attack on New York (how not) of a giant monster godzilliano (although of Cloverfield, Godzilla, little), from that point of view: from the eye of a domestic camera of a chavalada which the bug bitter them feast of farewell of his best friend. To as The Blair Witch Project. To the REC (is curious how two very similar projects have coincided in you time in this way without one having proof of the existence of the other).Unfortunately, Cloverfield is far from the excellent film by Jaume Balagueró and Paco Plaza. It is really entertaining and know create tension in the Viewer, but more based lightning and Thunder that no script. It also has a few visual effects, although discrete, met to perfection and are extremely realistic. Not to mention the wonderful sound effects, that if they are not the Oscar next year, would have to be something punishable by death. But despite all this, the script is bullshit, and (more or less correctly interpreted) characters, four subnormaloides whose decisions are the height of absurdity. No one in their right mind would accept entering in ground zero of a catastrophe, and more if there is a giant bug there milling, to save the girl in your friend whose state of health is unknown. In addition to fuck, which carries the camera not the loose while you have the bug before and go it to eating!Very little credible the film in that aspect, but you know, there's no business like show business, the show must go on, and all that stuff.Visually it is not bad, although us perdemos wonderful levels thanks to the ironic mode on, pulse surgeon that carries all the time the camera, ironic mode off. It moves, moves a lot, and there are times when despair. Now I would highlight a level of those that are for framing, if not because it is a spoiler as a cathedral. Good going, a track: Kiss.Confirmed Cloverfield II, by the way, that to know how call her (and will continue, because it is more closed than Lynn Redgrave at the hands of Woody Allen).And speaking of holder films, those responsible for that "translate" titles in this country, have once again demonstrated his incompetence: where is will get this monstrosity of Monstruoso muchachada, if the film is called field of CLOVERS? Very simple: is Monstruous was the phrase. promotional Word the tagline on one of the zillion American progress posters that came out of the movie (and all are equal), and one of these guys thought that it was the title of the movie, and the rest is history. is as if to Rec her they entitled in USA Living Fear!To piss and no echar gota. INCOMPETENCE, as well, in uppercase.
3,281
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1233
Yojimbo
American Dreamz
2
5
muchocine
Weitz is a perfect example of someone who succeeds thanks to the American dream that has been able to make this film.
I imagine Paul Weitz, analyzing the current situation of his country and thinking to himself: "I have to do something about that." "I have to tell the world what I see but making smile."A very laudable purpose in all those writers and directors who want to make social cinema. Yes, Yes, social cinema, as this film.We have on the one hand a current and real basis as the U.S.: a stupid President, terrorists are not so bad and may even be friendly, totally superficial social values reflected in a television with and for morons? go, like that in Spain: DPor across our clear intention to comic director when writing the script: he wants to make clear a clear critique but also a declaration of intent to provide something positive or a solution to these problems. And for that he seeks redemption for all those real characters. And of course, which covers very little press. Only you get to do some cosquillitas, a decaffeinated of international conflicts, a sticker in the portrait of some characters?American Dreamz is a kindly, topical and supposedly critical film that at times resembles a bad Spanish series of comedy (as if there were any good) and other a fun portrait of "the world upside down". However the formula "real 2 comedy" in hilarious tone not here covered and apart from not to provoke laughter, stays in a plea so pro-americano that anyone with two fingers in front will be as follows: the President of USA, surely expect much seen in the most stupid film, remains as a true hero and a great person who is only manipulateda company idiotizada by a tv program is its generational, that the superficiality which provides entertainment to that idiot society (Grant and Moore) can find their soul mate and, finally, that all the characters in the film they succeed in their own way.In fact Weitz is a perfect example of someone who succeeds thanks to the American dream that has been able to make this film. Of the pro-American pamphlets more brazen (and involuntary by a loose script with ingredients that pose uncomfortable) have been in a long time. You still smile a couple of times. Ah! And a joy is to see Dennis Quaid. The rest of the actors, flojillos, though I am amazed to Willem Dafoe as Jolie.
3,282
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/796
Kiko de España
Borat
4
5
muchocine
With times ashamed to himself Johnny Knoxville, Borat is a movie so fucking as necessary. A hilarious insult.
The personality of the year is Borat Sagdiyev, a beloved Kazakh reporter going to California and U to discover the american way of life and apply in your country / village. Filmed almost entire documentary style, Borat brings to light the (infinite) miseries of la peña that surrounds him, (in Kazakhstan and EEU and U), to stick the finger nail on while causing terrible attacks of laughter in the spectator, which is descojona by the unlimited capacity of Cohen to provoke and because he knows that people are (we are) soa shit (as told in due course after seeing Dogville) with moments that ashamed at himself Johnny Knoxville, Borat is a movie so fucking as necessary. A hilarious insult. A 8.PD: full absolute in rooms v.o.s. "cool", of those that are still projecting the gardener or Munich, takes pitch.
3,283
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1801
Tito Chinchan
Descubriendo a los Robinsons
4
5
muchocine
Film animation from adults to children, but bearable. It has comic, tender, emotive and moments of action, as well as a couple of messages that always good recall. I was delighted.
Go ahead, as already know my dear readers, which I like more than a silly animated films a pencil. And if a good animation, join you an interesting plot, its fun moments, its intrigue, its sensitive moments, and a superemotivo end, because her pussy gives me palmas (with forgiveness). So now you know that I am nothing objective with these movies.The film is a child of 12 years who is orphan. His mother abandoned him at the door of the horfanato when he was only a baby, and he dreams of meeting her. In addition to this, it is inventor, with a gifted intelligence, what makes anyone you want to take. Neither he nor his roommate, a very rare kid. Total, which happens to invent something that extracts the memories of his mind, to get to know her mother. But the invention doesn't work very well, which makes him desist remain inventor, until a mysterious kid appears in his life.Well, as supondreis I loved. The beginning of the movie was very infantiloide and did me lose a little illusion, but shortly after this takes another pace, more imaginative and absurd, that I love. The animations are as always, the host by bicycle. The variety of characters usually I assumed a handicap, but find it me very successful. The plot is very good, perhaps too prepared for a film, with an adult can not bored. Moreover, there are two morals or conclusions that can be drawn from the film, and the two I like (see the movie and the know). What most surprised was that they sing at the end (or what I dreamed) given that no sticks to the rest.In short, animated from adults to children, but bearable. It has comic, tender, emotive and moments of action, as well as a couple of messages that always good recall. I was delighted.Very interesting.Besitos.P.D: not be if go to the specialist in compulsive "llorones during watching movies infantiles";-)
3,284
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1414
Francisco Bellón
Dreamgirls
1
5
muchocine
Dreamgirls, is more than a story with musical numbers, a succession of songs with true plot filling between them
As every year, in the months of January and February, most favorite movies of face to the Oscar promptly meet your appointment with the Spanish cinemas. Although this time several of the most nominated films were released in the course of the calendar year, as infiltrators, the Queen, little Miss Sunshine or Babel. What is almost inescapable is among the favourites a musical, or at any rate a biopic (biographical film) musical, and Dreamgirls is the example of this season.Dreamgirls is based on a Broadway musical virtually forgotten, which in turn was freely inspired in the journey of the musical group The Supremes and their leader, Diana Ross. Bill Condon was very impressed by this musical, and hardened in the genus after the indent of Chicago, undertakes its film adaptation. The Dreamettes is a group formed by three friends who want to succeed in the music, and by accidents of fate, are hired to do the vocals of James "Thunder" Early (Eddie Murphy). Hence they give the jump to stardom, but they will soon begin the struggles of egos and clashes. The musical is one of the film genres that more passions rise, both among his admirers as among his detractors, and therefore there is always someone to praise the virtues of Dreamgirls (in their right is). But honestly, Dreamgirls, is more than a story with musical numbers, a succession of songs with true plot filling between them. Some of the musical numbers are well made, but it end up becoming unbearable soon, even for the more staunch lover of the genre. A lack of pace and a more than excessive length do the rest. It is a film made as means of showcasing the great diva Beyoncé Knowles, who succeed in the music of him is not enough, as well as the new star of American media, Jennifer Hudson, winner of American Idol. The sad reality is that Beyoncé, whose vocal talent is cuestioable, has lines of dialogue in the footage, and the few who has little demonstrates his total inability to interpretative. The próximamante oscarizada Jennifer Hudson, alias "triunfita", although it does not reach the ends of the Knowles, nor falls short, making an interpretation flat, devoid of feeling or emotion. Eddie Murphy is in his normal line, the only one that makes a true interpretation, and also good work is Jamie Foxx. There will be more than one spectator, be amazed before such cluster of absurdities, it will throw to the desperate ground, shouting things like someone I boot the eyes! or whispering to his seat-mate please, kill me already and please end my ordeal. The big question is why a filmmaker who has made gods and monsters can get to fall so low?, doubt that it may never be resolved.
3,285
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3725
Rafa Ferrer
Chuecatown
2
5
muchocine
The tape passes from mere entertainment for a rainy afternoon on DVD, these tapes where one cannot lift are several times of the sofa, which reenganchar to it, will have lost thread or rope, or you bother losing 10 or 20 min.
Among my circle of friends, where I have a couple of friends gays and lesbians, me strange basante nobody I speak of this movie, as if they did "Puppy" "Red roses" or "The trouble of Gray", however "Chuecatown" as if her would have swallowed the Earth, that is to say much of the type of tape that we face right?Today, after the new incursion of the Christmas with Will Smith and his "I am Legend" premieres not I really wanted break my head and wanted a comedieta of rapid consumption not I give much to think, or to attend, and the election could not be more accurate, since this film combines not only all possible gay topics (more than the bear type) but that seems above shot most of the possible homofobiassomeone even heterosexual can see and feel sadly angry.Juan Flahn, in the direction, after many shorts, made his debut in this, his second feature, with a script where it shows the shadow of Felix Sabroso and Dunia Ayaso and is that that "quirky" film made in Madrid, can only leave the head of two of them, but with a stick, while in "Descogelate" one started laughing with vivid situations byPepón Nieto, here, the two protagonists characters seem to very desubicados in the District of curious Chueca.Es as the characters of Pepón Nieto and Carlos Fuentes interpreted into two "Geeks" or "Geeks" (insurance so understands better) gay, lovers of comics, science fiction film, and jealous of their relationship, with more normal and without any caution in the neighborhood of Chueca Madridan excellent place of Madrid where can walk with total and absolute tranquility, not with that fear of "cool." which seems that it branded this stupid comedieta.On the other hand, note that Concha Velasco is on the decline, and that, after her excellent role in "Welcome home" of David Trueba, here plays a role for which he does not seem to be made, that fretful mother of one of the protagonists, also join to Rosa Maria Sarda, a major Spanish, another stupid paper film and add to Eduard Soto (an actor that I like frankly) but here seems to be repeating many clichés that we have seen him walk after the television show "Buenafuente".Tape not happens mere entertainment for a rainy afternoon on DVD, these tapes where one can get up several times of the sofa, both to go to the toilet, as for entering the kitchen for French fries, which to reenganchar at the same not be lost thread, or warps, or you bother losing 10 or 20 min. the same, if the Cinema Act obliges us to "swallow us" things like this, bad we are.
3,286
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2696
Iñaki Bilbao
Un buen día lo tiene cualquiera
3
5
muchocine
Nice comedy provided by Santiago Lorenzo, after his groundbreaking "MOM is boba", gets behind the camera for a second time.
Nice comedy provided by Santiago Lorenzo, after his groundbreaking "MOM is boba", gets behind the camera for a second time.I do not do comparisons between the two works because I did not see the first, but I guess this is less good than that. And just for some reason, this, "A good day.." is entertaining and part of a very good idea, but will deflate slowly.Anyway you can enjoy and, above all in its first third, you laugh really, and you descojonas even three or four times, especially hearing perogrullas, philosophy mad and other diatribes of the old spídido, as well as the descharrante visit of the protatonista Hacienda. A man who, if he does not take his daily pill seems a vegetable, but once taken, breaks out in a verbiage without end that crazy to the very Holy Job. here is the best of this, in general lines, funny comedy, good do Juan Antonio Quintana as Onofre. Not sure what will come out of his lips, but it is always something original, that part of reality, but adorned with a concoction of disjointed ineas causing hilarity.However, little by little, as the minutes pass, the pace numbs and everything becomes more or less calm, without much imagination, rather flat. Only in its final part, in the moments where the protagonist must opositar, returns to the messing and quality guionística, flourish with, for example, memorable departure of the President of the Court to the opponent when this tells them his age.In short, it is true that are in solfa important issues as loneliness on the human being, the problem of housing and work, the value of friendship and confidence, but it is no less true that, seeing the work as a whole, we can see clearly that this film would have required to be a medium length rather than a long.
3,287
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/168
Cp
El caso Slevin
3
5
muchocine
Funny, entertaining, at times intriguing, with a great Bruce Willis and a lovely Lucy Liu
All know those movies where you are slowly telling the story. Details at first unconnected, you know that they ended up having sense at the end. Many times, rather than the mystery of history, or where goes the screenwriter, who appreciate is that the explanation. elegant, that it does not appear in a forced way, and that you enjoy. Requirement essential, is not drive you crazy trying to anticipate what the history. Obviously you can not disconnect your brain, and ideas are happening, but you must participate in the game of the director, and let you take. If you do so, you can enjoy much of the film.In this case, if you meet the above, in case Slevin also you find a script full of good dialogue, funny and often interesting. The plot is relatively simple, and the director is shooting very effectively, with some images where stands that look as though that it was the camera and lighting (and if it was well a few times) while not continuing the story.On actions, well, I love Bruce Willis, and here he is completely, so I love. Secondary, or Morgan Freeman, Ben Kingsley, and no more, all of them very, very well. Finally, the main character, Josh Harnett, begins as a version of his character in 40 days, 40 nights, and so already can follow you perfectly, it is simply a little pardillo. Special mention, for Lucy Liu, than this prettier than ever, truly beautiful, and its role is fun, active and you want to return to the screen.In short, funny, entertaining, at times intriguing, with a great Bruce Willis and a lovely Lucy Liu. It is worth going a week night to see her.
3,288
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/203
Jeremy Fox
Xmen3
2
5
muchocine
Entretenidilla without more, in part due to its limited duration, but disappointing and far below the previous two series
"X-Men 3: the decision Final" (X-Men 3: The Last Stand) proposes an interesting premise: a pharmaceutical company has managed to create a serum that, injected into the blood of a mutant, he is able to make him a normal human. This will trigger a doubt among the mutants around the world: live a normal life or accept as they are.As I say, it is an interesting premise; the problem is that it is just one of the plot lines of the film. They have decided, moreover, address one of the sagas more mythical and complex history of the X-Men: the dark Phoenix saga. All this without forgetting the treatment of a number of parallel stories as the birth of El Ángel (Ben Foster), the relationship ice man-Pícara, the Phoenix-Código-Wolverine relationship, the return of the beast (Kelsey Grammer) or the growing leadership of storm in the team. Too many fronts would require a brilliant script to resolve them all. And unfortunately the script far from being brilliant.Because of this excess of claims we have characters who do not paint anything and arriving to disappear from the action, as by magic, you can to avoid the problem of not knowing what to do with them in the scenes end (still the problem becomes clear). In fact I think that purists will be the hands to the head to see how important characters in the comic are here so blurred that his appearance has no other function which serve for the showcasing of the Department of Visual effects and to be able to say that they appear in the film.It is curious that my great fear during the development process of the film was that the director was Brett Ratner. Once seen the film I have to admit that the blame for the outcome perhaps not theirs at all, but the script. I am sure that a director with more personality clear had been forced to Polish the script until it would be much better. On the other hand the Mise en scene of Ratner is purely functional; correct, Yes, but devoid of brilliance while in some scenes their lack of expertise see makeup on the excellent work of the team of Visual effects that allow us to see storm (Halle Berry), to Fenix (Famke Janssen) or Magneto deploy all its power (especially the latter two).On the side positive note the charisma of Hugh Jackman as Wolverine, who asks shouting a movie for him only (hopefully her lead someone better than Ratner), Patrick Stewart as Professor X and Ian McKellen as Magneto. I do not fail to mention the wonderful soundtrack of John Powell; author which raises points every day.In short, a film entretenidilla without more, in part due to its limited duration, but disappointing and far below the previous two series. As curiosity and notice to potential viewers comment that the movie just after the closing credits (although that scene might have been spared).
3,289
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3686
Emilio Calvo de Mora
Rec
3
5
muchocine
Hyperrealism, if they want to, but it matters little: matter is pure cinema, new movies, movies fact to last in the memory, but then (temperate) know what's deceit, what marketing and, above all, how much of what seen here is certainly new.
'[REC]' is based on a plot premise viscerally away from any film pattern: not fiction, there is a gradual and adrenalítica immersion in the pure terror. The fear may be lacking arguments so the Ribbon offers a mcguffin lengthened until the last five minutes (where there is a slight explanation for what we have referred to) and a coherent crescendo of scares and Visual atrocities filmed with an undeniable sense of the show, although cheater because puts us in direct a Spain verismo anyone when in reality (Plaza and Balagueró) makers are making movies, and also not insignificant. '[REC]' is physical film, a corporeality so tangible that hurts: its protagonists are not characters, though they are ontologically, but people and except some actor who note that it is, all away (and has its merit) force a diction or impostar a few gestures. The sensation of watching television (and not film) occupies almost all of the footage. What looks like a televised document makes that we feel as credible what we see. Cinema always deceives us, and we accept the deception as a payment for the happiness that we reported, but the effort of the writers (the cited Plaza and Balagueró more Luis Alejandro Berdejo) approaches the Vertigo and hyperrealist everyday reality shows and videos to the youtube to the big screen and breaks the innocence of Viewer. We are voyeurs, voyeurs with pedigree, if you want to, they have paid an entry and eat popcorn and drinking cola while they ametrallan us misery and vices, textures of the real that sometimes seem to fiction and matters of fiction resembling beauties of the real times, I would say Machado.El format here is the success, the success: are so accustomed to television we shape and positioned to the reality that we do not consider that cinema can also do so. At least, not as instantly. The film makes us better or worse people, gives us culture us dumbs, we enlisted in the army of the people trained and responsible, sensitive and human or makes us mercenaries of the foolish, robotized instruments of mediocrity. '[REC]' has the merit outstanding transfer formats, light film where before there was scattered bits of life that a clever editor has assembled for the benefit of the artistic innovation. Because the film is, above all, a prodigy of pure art. The Blair Witch Project breakthrough, but was a simplistic film--in its complexity - and devoid of hook, even though the idea (foundational) was remarkable. Perceive in '[REC]' what film in its very purest form, and I don't know exactly what I mean by that, but thus I felt. There is a kind of accountability before the small Magisterium of his workers, who handle with a priceless respect terror, which has been trampled, ignored, frivolizado, instrumentalizado and, finally, deformed until the parody by the recent film of masses and now get a rewarding injection of verve and coherence. '[REC]' must be the terror of the twenty-first century tape, or at least one that serve as reference to illustrate the modes of production in line with the times that we live. Shooting, imagine that nothing conventional da for a making of anthological, but is that the tape is in itself a making off of himself, a prodigious display of metacine asking to be referred to in a very strict context. The same must not be see the movie in large room in house. The movie theater is a wonderful place for many reasons. One of them is the ability that has to transform the spectator into true spectator. At home, the film is almost always an extra that sneaks into the relationship of domestic activities. I can prepare dinner and then sit on my high definition screen to watch a movie. Until I can stop it and dispense with all what I offer and return to what it was. Going to the cinema is to participate in a kind of invisible communion with the astonishment and the ritual. '[REC]' requests shouts be seen with more people.In fact, there are forums on the network reported on the reaction of the public with more detail and prose that opinion on the film itself.The mockumentary taken to the extreme of 1809–1865 fiction carries more than one hoax. The absence of a formal and elaborate script is excusable because what matters (and how) is that this deranged alembic of hatches and gloomy corridors we entertained for an hour and a half without, at any time, want to end of the hallucination.The zombie subgenre has found a key that will open new doors: there are already remake USA, apparently. Plaza and Balagueró are doing much for the Spanish film and are (mostly) dignifying a type of film usually cornered on the shelves of video shops, capable of delivering bazofias of the size of a planetary orbit more easily than any other genre, including bird melodrama, which is more reliably where the embarrassment, the misery and the falsity of those who seek to make art and found only a roll of tape which should impress with images.
3,290
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/255
Jose Contreras
Las colinas tienen ojos
3
5
muchocine
Wes Craven signed the original. His mark is visible in this version, the heroic solution of the fear in the boy who knows things that nobody wants to hear, in the end...
The Carter family crosses the desert of New Mexico to get to the California coast. The employee of a stinking petrol station indicates a shortcut to save a few hours, but that path leads them rights to an ambush. This area of the desert the habítan the human monsters that caused the test from the middle of the last century.By arbitrary that they may seem from a bloody movie deaths, the author always leaves a pattern. And the viewer leaves the room with this imprint in the head. If the family would have not got that shortcut to go to the coast would have not happened the tragedy. If the father fails to enter the House of the charge of the petrol station looking for her dog, responsible not had indicated them the road of death. I suspect that viewers we submit to the cruelty of cinema of terror in exchange for lessons of this kind. The characters who die first trace the line. The strategy that they have followed her, cry, beg, flee, does not help us. Those who survive only will be saved if they try another.Carter, Bukowski, family son-in-law is a pacifist who repudiates firearms and seeks explanations for the massacre as a good guy. He is the character who most has to change if he wants to go out live from hell. Minors have to overcome their fear.It is a battle for life or death among normal people physically and morally, against egendros are two-way. Contrary to Tim Burton, this type of film teaches us to hate what is different. AJA much slows the response of civilization. Your invitation to join in the orgy of blood is made with all kinds of delays. When the good guys decide highschool is, the public takes hours asking for it. Asians are less sanctimonious when it comes to delivering these banquets.Wes Craven signed the original. His mark is visible in this version, the heroic solution of the fear in the boy who knows things that nobody wants to hear. In the end.
3,291
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2763
Kiko de España
Viscosidad (The incredible Melting Man)
1
5
muchocine
The movie directed by William Sachs is a gap which plays in the same League that I drink your blood or Supersonic Man, the League classic series Z.
How to begin to talk about a film like this?I will tell you that is three sentences: an astronaut to be Saturn becomes viscous and radioactive and is devoted to kill peña to regenerate, to go missing eyes and ears on the way, the very gañán. how many phrases were those?Well, the fact is that the movie directed by William Sachs is a gap which plays in the same League that I drink your blood or Supersonic Man, the League classic series z. Special effects by Rick Baker are, without a doubt, the worst of his career. It is a film, (although it seems a telefilm) that goes straight to the point and five minutes already have seen as the monster is loaded to a slightly idiotic nurse, because it passes through a glass door rather than open it, in one of the most stupid scenes I remember.Then there are the dialogues, which are level E.G.B: do contaminate?, I have found to Frankenstein! or words forgotten as tontaina and beanpole fit in this spectacular film of shit that has the virtue of being only to create a new fantasy genre: the regore.I will try to explain the term: in one scene, the incredible derretible man attacking a fisherman, start you the head and the Strip to the River. The scene shifts and appears a muchachada about ten years smoking a few pitis and thinking if playing hide and seek or doctors. Then the scene changes and we see the head down the River until you reach a waterfall. The head falls to the rocks and breaks into pieces. Sustained Gore. Regore.Y talking about sustained, the levels have a disproportionately ridiculous duration, they are extremely long. And speaking of ridiculous, only I can tell you that there is one impressive scene, attention: A marriage viejuno will drive along a road in the middle of the night. On the sides of the road, as says the Lady of the car, there is "trees that give lemons".Derretible man walks around the area, therefore, the only option that old the palmen is that they stop in the middle of nowhere, early in the morning to collect lemons. And do it. Go laughter.For little more I can tell you. There is some point Z.A.Z. (the old on the stage of the corpse of the fisherman), that there are times in which absolutely nothing happens. Highly recommended for night cannabis.PS: The doctor well of the movie goes in search of "viscosity" with a meter giger, but what need you if the monster leave obvious traces, either in the form of bodies or in the form of viscous mass?PD2: Leaves Jonathan Demme. She plays Matt. It is a game of fun trying to find him. I think that I got.PD3: just edit on dvd.
3,292
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/490
Emilio Calvo de Mora
El perro mongol
4
5
muchocine
It will fill the heart of great lover of cinema that seeks, among so much trash so fire and artificial, a quiet trip to another world. Charged to the film. Go to remove and put in place a Cobblers.
He insists frequently to sign the film which lacks media oozing wit. This argument is not monopoly of the seventh art, but says it with more bombastic evidence. A study not left a paste him/her in a film if you suspect that the product can waver at the box office. Exceptions there are, of course.We are very acsotumbrados to see American films that smell money in each frame. This is not new. What it seems to me new is that a new European cinema of commercial approaches very similar to those who estilan in Hollywood there is. The film is art and business. Or even business and, occasionally, art.As I've been a lot of time without seeing art in recent films, I tend to distract me reviewing classics. Magnificent invention home cinema and dvd. He shadowed one in house conditions which would like to film, which is usually (in addition) contaminated annoying noise of vertiginous popcorn and febrile melodies of semitone in the nine row.This is a case because I just saw a movie which, in essence, is European, but also is Asian. It'll never compete at the box office with posh majors. Very rarely will be executives in the coffee talk at eleven, but it will fill the heart of great lover of cinema that seeks, among so much trash so fire and artificial, a quiet trip to another world.The film in question is called the mongol dog and more than film in the classic manner of the term, is a documentary that invites us to think otherwise. Not should the film do that occasionally? Trafficking in a girl (Nansal) who takes home a dog that has been found in a cave, a puppy, in reality. The father insisted not to host it as it imagines descended from wolves. Superstition occupies all the familiar imagery and the plot focuses on imposing the ancestral superfechería a sediment of reason.The conflict is not entirely Mongolian: is universal. It is entangled in the popular religiosity and take your Ribbon, vigorously, to the most intimate of human feelings: the belief that there is another world and that our soul does not die. In the absence of Christian heaven and right of the father, the Mongolian nomadic believes in reincarnation and arcane somehow suspected that when he died, his spirit will tour plants, trees, and small animals. until giving with a dog, and from there you can jump to a man.The most exciting of the mongol dog is its character of rare bird. Upon seeing her, we know that we are witnessing a unique fact, to the transition from one world to another. Mongolian nomads are doomed to look for the city, which is an extension of the Western City, food of dizziness, fevered by its moral dissipation, geared to grow at the expense of the man. And the alien to that death rattle Viewer is literally stunned by the strength of feeling that the film exhumes. To GLUGs. This is art. Mental detoxification. Opening an old language, but which we are not accustomed lately.I did not see the story of the weeping, the same mongol Director camel. I promise to go to the video store and catch her.Case is not (and that my video store is a jewel among the jewels for the fan film) I will come back home and put some Iranian movie of those lengthy levels and hypnotic music, when not absent. I sleep thinking that all the lights of my people becomes chrysanthemums.Charged to the film. It will be removed and put in place a Cobblers of any niñato posh with hook between the females amphetamine II and hormonadas.
3,293
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/163
Tito Chinchan
Scary movie 4
3
5
muchocine
As a film, is very bad, now, that I could laugh, it jumped me tears
Damn, only to see the poster already I mondo of laughter. And it is that these films have something that I love, and is that you can't sleep you a little while, and when you open the eye, still learning that it is. In a way, it is very similar to a porn movie. And like these, it is difficult to see a complete without becoming bored sovereignty. But this, to me, was an exception and I saw entire willingly.The film has neither argument nor established screenplay, since that is a sequence of funny situations that parodían "serious" films. So, tell you that the movie is about uniting "Saw", "The war of the worlds", "Million Dollar Baby", "Brokeback Mountain", "The forest", "The curse" and the embarrassment of George Bush when the 11-S in the movie parodies without end. Not be if I had missed some parodied film, but with this we have an idea, right? Well, we can see in the scene in which the President of the United States of America some of "Independence Day" above all to see a President of that country to think of a solution, ja, ja, ja.Wow, the film as a film, is very bad. Now, what I could laugh, that jumped me the tears. The argument does not exist, although not spin too bad scenes. The players are very good, highlighting the nonsense to Shaquil O´Neal under the skin of one saw or the poor girl in the war of the worlds. And it is that in these films should not speak of lighting, soundtrack, photography, etc. It is only measured in patochadas and goofiness, and this has surpassed outweigh those than I expected. And to make matters worse, only lasts 75 minutes, so if you don't like, in a moment ends your ordeal.In short, that the movie I really liked, with great moments such as the boxing match.
3,294
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3990
Moebius
Excalibur
4
5
muchocine
The story of Arthur is immortal, and this movie is a good example. J.R.R. Tolkien was, and after all, a simple apprentice. And "Excalibur" is without doubt the best film John Boorman addressed to it.
"Excalibur" is without a doubt the best movie has directed John Boorman (other worthy to see the director's films include Deliverance and El General, latter an entertaining biopic about a famous Irish thief.) (The emerald jungle not I keep a great memory, but I saw many, many years ago). Her particular vision of the Arthurian myth (the film is based on a review of "The death of Arthur", an epic of the 15th century) is excellent. Boorman decided to leave aside any historical point (notably the absence of any Christian reference) to focus on mythical history, but tell the evil, the cycle of life, the man as a being halfway between hope and despair.The cast of the film is excellent, which include a sober Nigel Terry as Arturo, lHelen Mirren as Morgana, and the excellent stage actor (and one of the notable assassins in series Colombo) Nicol Willliamson as Merlin, certainly the central character of the film, rather than the own Arturo. The story progresses with and through the old and twisted Wizard.It's funny, but apparently the United Artists told Boorman who could choose any actor for the role of Merlin, except to Williamson. I do not know until that point is true this story, but apparently finally Boorman came out with yours. God thank you.Perhaps at a first glance it may go unnoticed, but is Merlín who machine the events that are happening behind the curtain. As the good son of the devil that is, Merlín handles men at will to achieve its purpose. The story is simple: Uther Pendragon, with the help of Merlin, manages a difficult peace after years of war. In the celebration of celebration at the castle of his erstwhile enemy, the Duke of Cornwall, Uther Pendragon infatuated women's Duke, Igrayne. As usual, the Duke is not very happy with this idea, and the truce is broken. While the Duke died attacking the camp of Uther, it lies with Igrayne thanks to Merlín, who has granted the appearance of the Duke. Nine months later, Uther and Igrayne have a child that night fruit. But the treatment was that a descendant would be put in charge of Merlin. This leads to the child, and Uther, repentant, runs after him. However, he falls into an ambush. Badly wounded, he sinks his magic sword, Excalibur, in a stone. No one except he could have her.The beginning of the movie gives us an idea of how Merlín uses low human passions and weaknesses to capitalize and bring forward their plans. Although in principle his intentions are good, note that they are not human owners of their own destiny. Is lawful control over lower beings, even if it is for their own good? Should man give up their free will in pursuit of a world better? Merlin this belief, although welfare seeking is actually your own.The story that continues is well known: the son of Uther, Arthur, manages to get the sword of the stone and becomes King. After several years of wars against opponents it manages to unify England under his command with the help of the famous Knights of the round table, and a period of well-being and peace extends over the years. While Morgana begins to conspire, comes the crisis: Arturo discovers the infidelity of his wife Geneva with his best Knight, Lanzarote (this scene was shot by Boorman with an image of great strength, where lovers wake up and see the sword of the King stuck between them). The Earth has been riven by the sword; Meanwhile, Merlín loses its force and he is cheated by Morgana: the order has been lost permanently. Shortly afterwards, Morgana seduces Arthur and becomes pregnant from it.They come years of crisis, famine, uncertainty. A weak Arturo languishes in his Castle, while Morgana and her son Mordred conspire to take over the lands and the throne of Arthur. The last hope is the Holy Grail, the sacred Cup that will return the forces and faith to the King and the Earth will rise again.Ultimately, the Grail will be found, Mordred and Morgana defeated, and a new world will emerge from the ashes of Camelot. Arthur succumb from their wounds and will be held at his funeral boat adrift. The magic sword, Excalibur, will return at the hands of the Lady of the Lake. When they occurring dark times, and all seems lost, Arturo again wielding Excalibur, and will save Inglaterra.El Arthurian myth has many interpretations. In its Genesis is a story about hope, about a happy future, a confidence in a Savior in moments of weakness. With the death of Arturo finish time of Merlin and other mages. The Freemen are left adrift, but free to shape their future.That freedom had its price: on many occasions those men of the British Isles would be dark times: the Roman withdrawal and the barbarian invasions (which fits the historical Arthur), civil wars, Viking raids, the Norman invasion, the world wars. But in any evil is not despair: men suffer, fear, but finally confident in its future, because they know that Arthur will be: is this Arthur a man? Obviously not. A man perhaps convey your message, but the Arturo salvador perhaps the strength of the character, knowing that fighting and not down the arms will be the salvation.Returning to the film "Excalibur" is a film of great visual power, with a large photograph, an excellent script, and one of its most outstanding aspects, an excellent use of the music. The soundtrack lacks original compositions; great masters of classical music such as Richard Wagner and Carl Off sign the melodies of the film. It is probably the film (along with 2001: the Space Odyssey) which makes better use of already existing scores, to such an extent that seem to compound that someday appear in the film.The story of Arthur is immortal, and this movie is a good example. J.R.R. Tolkien was, and after all, a simple apprentice. Very applied and with great talent, but apprentice to the end and Cape.
3,295
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/1335
Elena Suárez
Ases calientes
2
5
muchocine
My desfavoritismo for this film being clear, I must say that I do not believe that you go you poorly at the box office because their dynamic Visual games tend to be digested quite easily by the adolescent population.
There are arguments that require a lot of violence (the Godfather, 1972) and violence without any kind of argument (a Clockwork Orange, 1971). This section could include the last film by Joe Carnahan, "Hot ACEs", alleged action comedy where we can find a deal with such familiar faces such as Ben Affleck, Andy Garcia, Ray Liotta or singer Alicia Keys.La narrative unfolds through several groups of killers who, knowing potential winners of a million of dollars, trying to put an end to the life of a quite disgusting magicianto which the police protect that he testificará against the mafia. The fun will begin when all end up together in the hotel where the alleged victim is hidden. Each draw there worst of if same and, alongside this, array sufficient for ending a barracks of the civil guard. In a story like this we cannot forget we introduce extremely violent and surreal characters because this is very funny and smells like what some call independent cinema (concept, incidentally, never understood that: independent of what or who). In the end, give a twist to the plot and we believe that we have an acceptable script, we, which commonly been called have faith.No doubt, this type of feature films has a quite exponential advantage: If you don't know how to solve a dramatic situation, charge you some of its protagonists, if you don't know how to solve two situations, charge you more. And said and done because as I would say my mother "here are not saved nor pointer". Ultimately, kilos of meat for hamburgers accompanied by their corresponding liters of ketchup and seasoned with a supposed black humor; set which bears more resemblance with a video-clip of the MTV that with a feature length action.My desfavoritismo for this film being clear, I must say that I do not believe that you go you poorly at the box office because their dynamic Visual games tend to be digested quite easily by the adolescent population (as occurs with certain types of food).
3,296
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/857
Emilio Calvo de Mora
La lista de Schindler
5
5
muchocine
These times of conversion of the itself politicians require that a movie like Schindler's list exists so that life triumph.
The experience of a generation is not transmissible to no other: transmitting the details, symbols, but not the history not regenerates, full, corrected, so that the future learn from its mistakes and agrees a hope. It might be thought serve as starting point for understanding a film like this.Cinema is not silent witness to history: is history, inventory of fashions and cultures, ethnicities and religions. Schindler's list is a formidable film and is a page of a book of Historia.El Viewer is deprived of its ambiguity: requires it to take a stance and the images are from a sobriety so brutal that there is no escape.Oskar Schindler (Liam Neeson) opposes the nazis recruited Jews who thus saved his life. This is, very briefly, the plot of the movie, but there's more. It is the horror of the war portrayed as few times: with cold objectivity, with grey demolition, with absolute asepsis. Wants Spielberg did not involve his eye in what filmed: confined to frame, move the camera where the action so requires, but remains pollute by which eye he sees, which is (I insist) foolish man, fear of man, the war man interposed between your happiness and your destination.These times of conversion of the itself politicians require that a movie like Schindler's list exists so that life triumph, and this I write is not a book of phrases rimbonbantes phrase: is the most efficient way of expressing the feeling that remains in the soul after we have seen its exciting plot.Schindler's list is an ode to life from the absence of life. A poem of three and peak with rima canalla in pairs and the odd pain. Tells Oskar Schindler in a scene of bombastic tenebrism to the nazi occupation under the command of the field how power is recognized by the goodwill and flexibility of who exercises. Tells that the accused knows dead before the execution and that it recognizes to the master by the possibility for it to resuscitate or postpone his death. On this conception of the authority, in times of war, Spielberg raised a monument of tenderness and crying with a black and white (only bypassed in the flame of the beginning and the end of the film) exquisite, accurate, beautiful to the absence of words that can express it.Very genuine American, so friend life system of shift to one side or another of prudence and justice, commits the peccadillo of consent to movies like this from time to time: beacon of light that should illuminate the blindness of men prayed in an advertisement for the time of its release.Ben Kingsley and Liam Neeson, even protagonists, do not carry the weight of the film, despite its dramatic ability is at the height of the very serious circumstances representing also.There are no actors: delete the character the actor. Spielberg did their myths of childhood (the alien, the hero with whip, Peter Pan, the dinosaurs) and resulted in an account with the Historia.Su recent Munich can not see from all this perspective, while save undeniable similarities with the list of Schindler.Curiosidades in line with the película:1.-A Jewish custom is go depositing a stone on the grave of a loved one as a token of eternal gratitude. At the end of the film, it looks like a retinue of Jews is leaving stones at the tomb of Schindler. They are Jews who in real life were saved by the own Schindler.2.-Steven Spielberg could not get permission to sign within Auschwitz, so of the death camp scenes were actually filmed on a stage that was intended to be an exact copy of one 3-the screenplay for the film passed through the hands of Martin Scorsese, backed for the sake of his Jewish ancestry and not knowing if it acometería the company with enough objetividad.4.-Tom Hanks and Kevin Costner also aspired to be Oskar Schindler, but Spielberg helped the novice and less well-known Liam Neeson playing the role of his life.Do not have here the best Nazi movie or best film about the Holocaust: is one of the best films of recent years, and undoubtedly the best (in my opinion) by Steven Spielberg. And the soundtrack adapted (along with the piano by Michael Nyman) to the object that Orchestra. John Williams is, no doubt, a teacher.
3,297
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/2633
Matías Cobo
Planet Terror
3
5
muchocine
I still see Robert Rodriguez as an ingenious type that has managed to surround and learn from friends from the world of cinema with more talent and best ideas that he.
The double session Robert Rodriguez and Quentin Tarantino have prepared us for this summer was one of the projects looked more forward. His aesthetic and content of eighties revival constitute an explicit tribute to a kind of cinema of terror and action, popularly known as B movies, of which this couple of friends and irreverent directors have both drunk in their careers. Grindhouse, container name which brings together the two films by this double session opens with the premiere of Planet Terror, the tape of the identifiable Mexican instantly by the powerful symbol in its poster embodies the beautiful Rose McGowan (charmed) with his Orthopedic fusil-pierna. I imagine that, due to the commercial dictates of today day, not been able to brand new Grindhouse which would have been more appropriate and coherent format: in one of the longed double sessions of our childhood. < but going to the grain, the tape of Rodríguez happens what to his previous other works. Provides good ideas, sequences of magnificent Bill (the closing credits of this film again you endorsed as a great filmador of stripteases after her uncover in this aspect with the legendary of the Hayek snake in ready), brutal beatings of humor (the joke about the Pope or the fake trailer for Machete is depart) and moments of action shot with simpar originality. However, when one scratches on its attractive packaging, the package that they reveal is rather poor. For the moment, I still staying with his fidelísima translation of the vignettes to celluloid by Miller Sin City, where the Mexican was a step forward in the adoption of digital technologies in the service of a very specific aesthetic idea and, at the same time, improved her good skills in the composition of scores; which also is noted in the original soundtrack of Planet Terrror, with a sound clearly indebted to Sin City.Debo recognize that Planet Terror not excites me too much because nor did it at the time the kind of cinema that it intends to pay homage. I end up tired exaggerated blood with humorous desire baths or the annihilation of zombies / infected plan video game console. Do yes I like quirky characters such as the pair of brothers? the police and the owner of a ramshackle road bar? in competition lifetime to achieve the best sauce barbecue in the State of Texas. And I also like Rodriguez, Tarantino-style, to recycle in his films known actors of the past that we can now rediscover in unsuspected facets (such as the great Michael Parks, a regular in the recent work of the couple Rodríguez-Tarantino).However, after having viewing Planet Terror, I still see Robert Rodriguez as an ingenious type that has managed to surround and learn from friends from the world of cinema with more talent and best ideas that he. Somehow, still find me a promising disciple starts to chisel a style (such as the indispensable Hispanic touch of all of his works), but which lacks free from so many outside references to offer something more unequivocally theirs.
3,298
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/3844
Jeremy Fox
El Orfanato
3
5
muchocine
Possibly the best product of the Spanish film of the year and the closest thing to a blockbuster that can shoot today in Spain. The problem is that the story is very light and is quite predictable.
Released two months ago and converted almost to the moment in the great success of the Spanish film of 2007, it is high time that comment here my opinion on a film that I took me to see for lack of time and took to comment on due to lack of enthusiasm. "The orphanage" is, I want to make that clear, possibly the best product of the Spanish film of the year. A type of commercial cinema that we should do more in our country: directed by Juan Antonio Bayona (that you predict a great future), with one camera more active than usual in our cinema, a wonderful sound, effective art direction, a good soundtrack, good performances and some really disturbing moments, that manages to maintain the interest of the viewer during the slide. Put another way, the Ribbon is the closest thing to a blockbuster that can shoot today in Spain. In fact, it has nothing to envy to the American blockbusters that burst ticket offices around the world. Every euro invested in the making of the film is seen on screen and it shows, I repeat, the high level of production of the film. The problem, for me, is another. The problem is that the story is very light and is quite predictable. Already been made so many movies of supernatural terror in the history of the film and so many and so many years there already, just, to the surprise of all. By that when the final moments, superbly directed on the other hand, one cannot avoid a disappointment. For example, and without leaving the Spanish film, I have to say that I've found more than one resemblance to "The room of the child", the episode directed by Alex de la Iglesia to the series of tv-movies "Films not sleeping". For this reason, who ends up becoming owner of the function and prove once and for all that she is a good actress that must be taken very seriously is Belen Rueda, able to suffer on screen as few and worthy of all the praise it has received and could be extended, to a lesser extent by having less weight in the final result, to almost all his co-stars. In short, a film that is well, a perfectly topped product but it offers nothing particularly novel and that, in my opinion and despite what they say many, is not the best of the Spanish film of this year. Final rating: 6.5 out of 10.
3,299
archivos_extraidos/MCE-Corpus-main/Dataset/319
Emilio Calvo de Mora
Poseidon
2
5
muchocine
It is as if we now put to make semiotics with the song of the summer and find three feet to a simple cat. Poseidon is the cat of the summer. The fat cat going to box.
There are some strict mood and severe step that cinephiles not transije with products like this because they abound in deception and perhaps are they escoran in excess, and very deliberately, of artistic values. The subgenre of naval disaster has not given remarkable titles in the history of the cinema and Wolfgang Petersen has not done much for bending the rule. Poseidon water lost in the script, and not in the wave of I don't know how many meters that tomb. Little matter that there are actors as nor is it relevant that these actors have given a few phrases. There are currently twenty-minute verbal film and seventy (Luckily the footage is reasonable) special effects. And not bad, exactly. We have heard many times that the film lacks media caters ingenuity. The film is art and, occasionally, business. Or even business and few times, art. Lacking in artistic ambition, Poseidón sinks because you don't need to float to make box office. Requires a vitamin gruesomeness trailer several manifests where pasta producer him/her and not going more in effects. In this case, Poseidón reaches the acceptable average of artifice digital films without stridency. The deception is consented and far from being warning not to repeat such an experience again becomes seed generous future approaches to movies of the same kind, as scandalously commercial (and misaligned of strictly cinematic quality) products which are even excluded from the usual meat of some critics of current press viciously. It is as if we now put to make semiotics with the song of the summer and find three feet to a simple cat. Poseidon is the cat of the summer. The fat cat going to box. Film education, that there is also, like the book or the musical happens to see these clunkers when one has, what was I, acne, or large eyes that open more to the Prodigy of studies and all those gadgets in the service of entertainment pure and simple. Then this friendly, undemanding membership should allow the pleasure of seeing other things. Adolescence, with their dizziness and its líbidos, like last seen one day the diligence of John Ford. Or M, the vampire of Dusseldorf, Fritz Lang. In end, film, art, knowledge, beauty. Evasion also, of course. Having said that, we perhaps allowing see Poseidón in a summer cinema, eating popcorn with one hand and pouring a liter of coke in the other. A good ambigú would give the ideal metaphysical counterpoint. Oh, except for the first two minutes of the film where a comprehensive and perfect camera sweeps the boat. The only thing real is the character that makes running for cover. In fact, we already knew, is merit infographic.