Datasets:

---

Ramitha

/

alqa-contextembs-mistral

like 0

"What does the Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998 require(...TRUNCATED)

"The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998, as outlined in t(...TRUNCATED)

"AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose (...TRUNCATED)

"The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998 for Beechcraft 30(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the purpose of the Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued for Beechcraft 300 Series Aeroplanes(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: According to the snippet provided, the purpose of the Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued f(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What is the purpose of the Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39(...TRUNCATED)

"**Answer:**\n\nThe purpose of the Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) (...TRUNCATED)

"What specific actions are required to be taken in relation to Beechcraft 300 Series Aeroplanes in a(...TRUNCATED)

"In accordance with the Airworthiness Directive issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998, th(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998 requires (...TRUNCATED)

"The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998 requires that the(...TRUNCATED)

"The provided text describes an Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued for the Beechcraft 300 Series Ae(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.7771510481834412, 2.376387119293213, -2.2221953868865967, -1.4531033039093018, 6.521387100219727(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.945505142211914, 1.7554802894592285, -0.46648108959198, -1.3965058326721191, 8.328594207763672, (...TRUNCATED)

"[1.3124765157699585, 1.183045506477356, 0.3087456524372101, -1.5714020729064941, 6.713678359985352,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.8451954126358032, 0.38253140449523926, 0.963709831237793, -1.8075459003448486, 6.566987037658691(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.8579881191253662, 0.8227360248565674, -0.515674352645874, -0.16990706324577332, 6.07941293716430(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.074584722518921, 1.3871748447418213, -1.654208779335022, -1.938354730606079, 5.026557922363281, (...TRUNCATED)

"[0.5425280928611755, 1.8084583282470703, 0.5316799879074097, -1.5015403032302856, 5.151553630828857(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.04094227775931358, 0.8656237721443176, 0.5880917310714722, -2.485365390777588, 5.985538005828857(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.143824815750122, 1.9279711246490479, -0.8815341591835022, -0.4470565915107727, 7.353119373321533(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.2263876497745514, 0.4225991368293762, -0.3770129382610321, -2.3387961387634277, 6.9326553344726(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.6946324706077576, 0.0024464824236929417, -0.3562007546424866, -2.548922538757324, 6.698065280914(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.525338888168335, 0.8577262163162231, 1.0905680656433105, -0.8695388436317444, 8.864389419555664,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.5497230887413025, 0.4382484257221222, 0.22406668961048126, -2.482654571533203, 7.57282018661499,(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the definition of a non-member spouse, splitting agreement, splitting order, and superannua(...TRUNCATED)

"Under the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), a non-member spouse is defined as a (...TRUNCATED)

"non‑member spouse means a non‑member spouse within the meaning of Part VIIIB or VIIIC of the Fa(...TRUNCATED)

"A \"non-member spine\" is a term defined under Part VIIIB or VIIIC of the Family Law Act 1975, and (...TRUNCATED)

"What is the legal definition of a \"non-member spine\" under Part VIIIB or VIIIC of the Family Law (...TRUNCATED)

"According to the snippet provided, the legal definition of a \"non-member spouse\" under Part VIIIB(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What does the term \"non-member spouse\" mean within the meaning of Part VIIIB or VII(...TRUNCATED)

"answer:\n\n**Answer:**\n\nThe term \"non-member spouse\" within the meaning of Part VIIIB or VIIIC (...TRUNCATED)

"What is a non-member spouse and how is it defined within the context of superannuation splitting ag(...TRUNCATED)

"A non-member spouse is a spouse who is not a member of the superannuation system, but is still enti(...TRUNCATED)

"According to the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), a non-member spouse is define(...TRUNCATED)

"A non-member spouse, splitting agreement, splitting order, and superannuation interest according to(...TRUNCATED)

"answer:\n\nAccording to the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), the definition of (...TRUNCATED)

"[1.4478214979171753, 3.0922350883483887, -0.4322068989276886, -5.381718635559082, 2.997316837310791(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.259676694869995, 4.18271017074585, -2.534651041030884, -5.307722568511963, 3.750795602798462, -1(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.0675411224365234, 3.8901026248931885, -0.9559034109115601, -6.170055866241455, 2.771599054336548(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.2998392581939697, 2.7636842727661133, -0.6564720869064331, -5.617212772369385, 2.432013273239135(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.4599876403808594, 2.5798559188842773, -0.5847527980804443, -4.9444050788879395, 2.72960114479064(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.8416552543640137, 3.861767292022705, -2.0369296073913574, -4.657527446746826, 3.0572597980499268(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.5689687728881836, 2.624403953552246, -2.2674739360809326, -2.839932918548584, 3.1545839309692383(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.181020498275757, 3.852837562561035, -1.0130196809768677, -6.4695587158203125, 2.3397343158721924(...TRUNCATED)

"[-1.0427531003952026, 2.276553153991699, 0.5676459074020386, -6.059630870819092, 3.656442165374756,(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.191680431365967, 3.1616058349609375, -1.529845118522644, -5.864874362945557, 2.6297168731689453,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.2639213800430298, 2.2542636394500732, -0.4812609553337097, -7.118178844451904, 2.618113040924072(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.336599349975586, 2.341667652130127, 1.8403854370117188, -7.11154317855835, 3.6490299701690674, -(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.0832459926605225, 3.6077721118927, -0.6439634561538696, -6.240518569946289, 2.4213762283325195, (...TRUNCATED)

"Who were the parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1652, the (...TRUNCATED)

"ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA V402 OF 1999 BETWEEN: HOPE DOWNS MA(...TRUNCATED)

"The parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron Pty Ltd (...TRUNCATED)

"What were the parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iro(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron (...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What are the parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Ir(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersley Ir(...TRUNCATED)

"The parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron (...TRUNCATED)

"The parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron Pty Ltd (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Ir(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.7829921245574951, 2.275529384613037, 0.7530416250228882, -0.9072563052177429, 5.211573600769043,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.012979304417967796, 2.715606927871704, -2.1397643089294434, -1.6856693029403687, 4.3331789970397(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.0618088245391846, 1.8865300416946411, 0.18176499009132385, -3.2181739807128906, 5.04320716857910(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.468442678451538, 1.8379203081130981, -0.2734076976776123, -2.7598040103912354, 5.122934818267822(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.5447406768798828, 2.2875006198883057, 0.28157541155815125, -0.8988119959831238, 4.79431390762329(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.0066864490509033, 2.210925340652466, 0.9195934534072876, -2.3040730953216553, 4.210450649261475,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.4540318250656128, 2.409938097000122, 0.28111815452575684, -0.8394152522087097, 4.750682830810547(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.52008855342865, 2.2782678604125977, 0.15226010978221893, -3.7755651473999023, 4.715654373168945,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.366351842880249, 2.0189173221588135, 0.525958776473999, -3.6223983764648438, 4.940392017364502, (...TRUNCATED)

"[1.726158618927002, 1.6586596965789795, 0.011791273951530457, -3.529944896697998, 3.814398765563965(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.287724494934082, 2.577430486679077, 0.02314189448952675, -3.383657693862915, 4.746417999267578, (...TRUNCATED)

"[1.2966947555541992, 2.210212469100952, 0.3374600112438202, -3.9394872188568115, 4.991615295410156,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.726158618927002, 1.6586596965789795, 0.011791273951530457, -3.529944896697998, 3.814398765563965(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings according to the decision in Pol(...TRUNCATED)

"In the decision of Police v Horsfield; Police v Dowd [2013] NSWLC 17, it was noted that the purpose(...TRUNCATED)

"13His Honour noted in his judgment that there is a specific provision of the Legal Aid Commission A(...TRUNCATED)

"The purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings, according to the decision in Police v H(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings, according to the decision in Po(...TRUNCATED)

"According to the decision in Police v Horsfield; Police v Dowd [2013] NSWLC 17, the purpose behind (...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What is the purpose of awarding costs in legal proceedings according to the decision (...TRUNCATED)

"**Answer:**\n\nAccording to the decision in Police v Horsfield; Police v Dowd [2013] NSWLC 17, the (...TRUNCATED)

"What is the purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings, and how does it differ from the(...TRUNCATED)

"In Dunlevy LCM v Police, the purpose of awarding costs to the Legal Aid Commission is to indemnify (...TRUNCATED)

"According to the decision in Police v Horsfield; Police v Dowd [2013] NSWLC 17, the purpose behind (...TRUNCATED)

"In accordance with the decision in Police v Horsfield; Police v Dowd [2013] NSWLC 17, the purpose b(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings according to the decision in (...TRUNCATED)

"[1.4544767141342163, 1.3869469165802002, -0.36969801783561707, -1.0271939039230347, 2.7439286708831(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.1501970291137695, 3.0901384353637695, -2.3992438316345215, -1.4106932878494263, 2.78120660781860(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.3060107231140137, 0.20574966073036194, -0.9036598205566406, -2.283653974533081, 3.87593650817871(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.4203702211380005, -0.3330426514148712, -1.7778011560440063, -2.5337533950805664, 2.9334702491760(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.5131341218948364, 1.376116156578064, -1.318254828453064, -1.6011415719985962, 2.4893240928649902(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.380699634552002, 0.8145902752876282, -0.6037055850028992, -2.1620028018951416, 2.209903001785278(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.455119013786316, 1.047509789466858, -0.21968156099319458, -1.0520541667938232, 2.372320890426635(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.8500935435295105, -0.2554512917995453, -0.1078808456659317, -2.606036424636841, 3.81150865554809(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.7578569650650024, -0.8673838376998901, -2.0570404529571533, -1.838836908340454, 3.15529036521911(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.583612322807312, -0.14665673673152924, -0.763729453086853, -1.966451644897461, 4.251577377319336(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.432896375656128, -0.20912069082260132, 0.22097940742969513, -1.9846876859664917, 3.7150497436523(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.5960304737091064, 0.19450166821479797, -1.6425392627716064, -1.7737866640090942, 3.5768046379089(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.583612322807312, -0.14665673673152924, -0.763729453086853, -1.966451644897461, 4.251577377319336(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the case of Moles v(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of Moles v The University of Adelaide [2001] FCA 1666, the Court refused the applicants(...TRUNCATED)

"REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 On 25 September 2001, the applicants filed an application and accompanying s(...TRUNCATED)

"The outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the case of Moles v The Univ(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the case of Moles v(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the snippet provided, the outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief (...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What was the purpose of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the c(...TRUNCATED)

"**Answer:**\n\nThe applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the case of Moles v The Univ(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the case of Moles v(...TRUNCATED)

"The outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief was that the Court refused to m(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: The outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the case of Moles v (...TRUNCATED)

"The outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief was that the Court refused to m(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the snippet, the outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the ca(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.1561109572649002, 2.385449171066284, -0.2965782880783081, -0.939990222454071, 3.535632848739624,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.7876265048980713, 3.858767509460449, -1.6595087051391602, -0.7702944278717041, 3.788103342056274(...TRUNCATED)

"[-1.1378613710403442, 2.0661230087280273, -1.9437060356140137, -2.2453880310058594, 3.5018167495727(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.8026083111763, 2.0883095264434814, -0.9968575835227966, -0.2598552703857422, 3.1945154666900635(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.20475263893604279, 2.0190112590789795, -0.7385063171386719, -0.17077581584453583, 2.317654609680(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.373769074678421, 2.058715581893921, -0.15469397604465485, -2.164059638977051, 3.684767723083496,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.20475263893604279, 2.0190112590789795, -0.7385063171386719, -0.17077581584453583, 2.317654609680(...TRUNCATED)

"[-2.257577419281006, 1.4166558980941772, -0.7740084528923035, -2.3956682682037354, 4.10320901870727(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.4475706815719604, 3.218981981277466, -0.6840951442718506, 1.1783833503723145, 2.152763605117798,(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.35337015986442566, 0.3585779070854187, -0.8490320444107056, -0.32220298051834106, 2.43153858184(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.7245692610740662, 0.3018191456794739, -0.49616023898124695, -2.2654213905334473, 3.471293926239(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.073901891708374, 2.318997383117676, -0.8949375152587891, 0.177712082862854, 3.0918755531311035, (...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.9656765460968018, 1.3970226049423218, -1.5130457878112793, -1.2196288108825684, 3.1274209022521(...TRUNCATED)

"What are the specifications of the $1 and $2 coins as per the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) Dete(...TRUNCATED)

"According to the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) Determination 2012 (No. 5) (Cth), the $2 coin is (...TRUNCATED)

"Schedule 1 (section 4) Part 1 Specifications of coins Item Denomination Standard composition Standa(...TRUNCATED)

"The specifications of the $1 and $2 coins, as outlined in the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) Dete(...TRUNCATED)

"What are the specifications for the $2 coin, as outlined in the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) De(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: According to the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) Determination 2012 (No. 5), the specifica(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What are the specifications of the $1 and $2 coins as outlined in the Currency (Royal(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the provided snippet, the answer to the question is as specified above. Please let me know(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The $1 and $2 Australian coins have the same specifications. The only difference is that th(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: According to the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) Determination 2012 (No. 5) (Cth), the spe(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The $1 coin is made of copper, aluminium, and nickel and has a diameter of 20.62 mm, a thic(...TRUNCATED)

"answer:\n\nThe specifications of the $1 and $2 coins as per the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) De(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.764514207839966, 1.3088003396987915, -4.424049377441406, -3.6293931007385254, 2.5875184535980225(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.2207694053649902, 2.294379711151123, -5.947979927062988, -2.592341184616089, 1.5081380605697632,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.5341055393218994, 2.1117913722991943, -4.884582996368408, -4.746957302093506, 1.0425810813903809(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.2195827960968018, 2.935870885848999, -4.835725784301758, -3.373029947280884, 1.2948577404022217,(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.005016326904297, 1.5763283967971802, -2.179246664047241, -2.705152988433838, 2.0771520137786865,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.9577058553695679, 1.6348243951797485, -4.133870601654053, -4.849493503570557, 1.103973627090454,(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.800776958465576, 1.4616881608963013, -4.562870502471924, -2.968838930130005, 1.9337661266326904,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.8928298950195312, 1.1334702968597412, -0.4425804018974304, -3.557624101638794, 1.905871987342834(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.19516302645206451, 1.8193790912628174, -4.38613224029541, -3.7474660873413086, 1.187685012817382(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.7410175800323486, 3.2566418647766113, -3.500856399536133, -2.9182255268096924, 0.111536316573619(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.4754951000213623, 1.7626956701278687, -4.2493205070495605, -3.1992576122283936, 0.64086747169494(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.2895101308822632, 2.416149854660034, -5.2336320877075195, -2.953977346420288, 1.0753276348114014(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.1091651916503906, 2.613332509994507, -3.8156485557556152, -3.080857276916504, 0.2864489555358886(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 603,(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 603,(...TRUNCATED)

" 4 When the matter was before the magistrate, the appellant apparently argued the decision of the T(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 603,(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the basis for dismissing the appellant's appeal in the case of NABC v Minister for Immigra(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The basis for dismissing the appellant's appeal in the case of NABC v Minister for Immigrat(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe main issue raised by the appellant in this case is the alleged failure of the Tribun(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the grounds on which the Tribunal made its decision to dismiss the appellant's applicatio(...TRUNCATED)

"The grounds on which the Tribunal made its decision to dismiss the appellant's application for revi(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The appellant in the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous A(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 603,(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nIn the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [200(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.8175928592681885, 1.98162841796875, -1.574920892715454, -3.250676393508911, 3.675140380859375, -(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.395930051803589, 4.354271411895752, -1.4522359371185303, -0.5426538586616516, 1.411112904548645,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.6809821128845215, 3.3039777278900146, -1.34475576877594, -2.390507459640503, 2.9407687187194824,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.5994114875793457, 1.9534796476364136, -1.2542974948883057, -2.449350595474243, 2.519973754882812(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.203383207321167, 2.457209587097168, -0.1755247563123703, -1.7318413257598877, 2.4633660316467285(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.6104209423065186, 1.7341563701629639, 1.03496515750885, -3.3604423999786377, 2.0711238384246826,(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.5994184017181396, 3.2167060375213623, 0.06816127151250839, -1.7521976232528687, 3.08924007415771(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.750572443008423, 1.2667362689971924, 0.7230203151702881, -1.1333519220352173, 3.2467784881591797(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.4939401149749756, 2.8679749965667725, -1.383953332901001, -1.1262385845184326, 2.980579137802124(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.0893834829330444, 1.130841612815857, -1.7983423471450806, -2.6613662242889404, 3.871510267257690(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.3806946277618408, 3.173706293106079, -2.0660650730133057, -2.644247531890869, 3.4861974716186523(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.6943674087524414, 3.1707959175109863, -1.9066835641860962, -2.4695796966552734, 2.58771896362304(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.020813465118408, 2.8303470611572266, -0.6921873092651367, -1.9995485544204712, 2.338418960571289(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 532, was the claim put forward by Mr Reyn(...TRUNCATED)

"No, in the matter of Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 532, the court did not consider the(...TRUNCATED)

"20. For these reasons, it is not necessary to address the further question, to which the parties de(...TRUNCATED)

"The claim put forward by Mr Reynolds in the case of Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 532 (...TRUNCATED)

"What is the reasoning behind the judge's decision regarding the lack of abuse of process in the cas(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe reasoning behind the judge's decision regarding the lack of abuse of process in the (...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** Does the claim put forward by Mr Reynolds in Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSW(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nMr Reynolds' claim in Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 532 did not give rise t(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the nature of the claim made by Mr Reynolds in the case of Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2(...TRUNCATED)

"Mr Reynolds claimed that Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd was entitled to receive the Service Payment,(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: No, the claim put forward by Mr Reynolds was not considered an abuse of process due to dupl(...TRUNCATED)

"An abuse of process would occur if the claim in the Expedition List Proceedings was an abuse of pro(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nIn the case of Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 532, the claim put forward by (...TRUNCATED)

"[0.9288944005966187, 2.3860020637512207, -1.0409729480743408, -1.3097890615463257, 5.95317554473876(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.5591530799865723, 3.940739870071411, -2.1867072582244873, -0.12818120419979095, 2.29813241958618(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.130063772201538, 2.436711549758911, -0.8977261781692505, -1.0394757986068726, 3.7538697719573975(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.2266770601272583, 1.5683082342147827, -1.0436692237854004, -0.8842334747314453, 3.96264982223510(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.364340305328369, 1.281230092048645, 0.08340834081172943, -2.2422027587890625, 3.9653897285461426(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.3425270318984985, 1.5124249458312988, -0.9637375473976135, -0.8139633536338806, 4.36893749237060(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.4049665927886963, 2.1791036128997803, -0.8224237561225891, -0.8094385862350464, 3.75408673286438(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.1692039966583252, 1.6876171827316284, -0.7279856204986572, -1.1437395811080933, 3.39028787612915(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.9919288158416748, 2.83819580078125, -0.5079828500747681, -1.59409761428833, 2.615943431854248, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.3881962299346924, 0.1661958396434784, 0.4007430672645569, -1.0078403949737549, 4.359721183776855(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.2470647096633911, 1.3515115976333618, -0.26837095618247986, -2.5084333419799805, 4.5653433799743(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.7865426540374756, 1.2952544689178467, -2.65468168258667, -1.5782185792922974, 4.499210357666016,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.6219817399978638, 2.1877057552337646, -2.610067844390869, -0.9110325574874878, 2.897185802459717(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the charge and penalty for the offender in the case of R v David Keith Green [2019] NSWDC (...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of R v David Keith Green [2019] NSWDC 66, the offender was charged with recklessly dama(...TRUNCATED)

"remarks on sentence 1. On 13 March 2019 the offender was arraigned on an Indictment containing the (...TRUNCATED)

"The offender, David Keith Green, was charged with recklessly damaging the Corrective Services cell (...TRUNCATED)

"answer: According to the snippet, the charge brought against David Keith Green was \"recklessly dam(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\n**Answer:** The subject matter of the sentence in this snippet is the offender's damage (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The maximum penalty proscribed for the offence committed by David Keith Green was 10 years (...TRUNCATED)

"answer: According to the snippet provided, the charge and penalty for the offender in the case of R(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe charge and penalty for the offender in the case of R v David Keith Green [2019] NSWD(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.9475064277648926, 2.1214864253997803, 1.2055413722991943, -1.3905848264694214, 2.365183353424072(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.940646171569824, 2.6028857231140137, -3.1933791637420654, -3.770922899246216, 1.913164496421814,(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.5033669471740723, 0.4930403530597687, -1.678159475326538, -3.124035120010376, 3.9559643268585205(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.1337268352508545, -0.35774290561676025, -1.3635348081588745, -2.7464418411254883, 3.495826482772(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.582754373550415, 3.623903512954712, -0.01723419316112995, -1.7997175455093384, 1.755260944366455(...TRUNCATED)

"[4.6278510093688965, 2.506804943084717, 0.47662535309791565, -2.7271969318389893, 1.783582925796508(...TRUNCATED)

"[4.461450099945068, 0.5067466497421265, 1.9661929607391357, -0.4713490605354309, 3.4512321949005127(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.1988723278045654, 1.9689325094223022, 1.078913688659668, -3.993157148361206, 3.3284313678741455,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.8875945806503296, 1.3801406621932983, -0.989988386631012, -3.317610263824463, 2.2936770915985107(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.902843713760376, 0.31895962357521057, -0.23149195313453674, -3.4082531929016113, 4.2206349372863(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.933396816253662, -0.2516516149044037, -0.3130553662776947, -3.4252214431762695, 3.57470512390136(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.5552775859832764, 0.19127054512500763, 0.17458006739616394, -4.5798115730285645, 2.7272927761077(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.4970483779907227, -0.2181563377380371, -1.3325060606002808, -3.438453197479248, 4.08182334899902(...TRUNCATED)

"What evidence was found during the police investigation of the offender in the case R v Green [2022(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case R v Green [2022] NSWDC 749, the police investigation revealed that the offender had sig(...TRUNCATED)

"ADDITIONAL CHARGES 20. Further police investigations revealed that the offender had signed a standa(...TRUNCATED)

"During the police investigation of the offender in the case R v Green [2022] NSWDC 749 in New South(...TRUNCATED)

"What additional charges were brought against the offender in the case R v Green [2022] NSWDC 749 ba(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: The additional charges brought against the offender in the case R v Green [2022] NSWDC 749 (...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What additional charges were brought against the offender in the case R v Green [2022(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nBased on the evidence discovered during the police investigation in R v Green [2022] NSW(...TRUNCATED)

"What type of firearm(s) did the offender possess, and how did their possession of these firearms vi(...TRUNCATED)

"The type of firearm(s) possessed by the offender is not explicitly stated in the provided snippet. (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: During the police investigation of the offender in the case R v Green [2022] NSWDC 749 in N(...TRUNCATED)

"The evidence found during the police investigation of the offender in the case R v Green [2022] NSW(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe evidence found during the police investigation of the offender in the case R v Green(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.106066346168518, 1.9090663194656372, -0.6207388639450073, -0.7459192872047424, 3.507499456405639(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.4392905235290527, 3.658480167388916, -1.8497817516326904, -3.7252626419067383, 2.945925951004028(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.2309086322784424, 2.633955478668213, -2.023674726486206, -3.968705177307129, 2.8582701683044434,(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.9835124015808105, 1.0009913444519043, -0.8452279567718506, -4.3784260749816895, 1.99858248233795(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.180044412612915, 2.4774625301361084, 1.463459849357605, -4.923882484436035, 3.784947633743286, -(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.2443008422851562, 0.9266977906227112, -0.2552681565284729, -3.538940668106079, 2.681082487106323(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.971743583679199, 1.2733047008514404, -1.269364356994629, -2.573587656021118, 3.4767675399780273,(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.5212514400482178, 1.1129403114318848, -1.2515254020690918, -4.8499627113342285, 2.141357421875, (...TRUNCATED)

"[2.304414987564087, 1.2734724283218384, 1.03545343875885, -4.528260707855225, 3.30619740486145, -1.(...TRUNCATED)

"[3.1744472980499268, 0.8833791017532349, -1.0011529922485352, -5.615509986877441, 3.322659969329834(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.2206575870513916, 1.8613594770431519, -0.879921019077301, -3.698848247528076, 3.050694227218628,(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.135510206222534, 2.0346832275390625, -0.4979098439216614, -3.5946013927459717, 2.654001235961914(...TRUNCATED)

"[1.6505622863769531, 1.1970243453979492, -1.4104644060134888, -3.7003650665283203, 2.66686439514160(...TRUNCATED)