Datasets:
Neuronovo
/
neuronovo-utc-data-glue-mnli

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
x
stringlengths
41
1.99k
y
int64
0
1
label_id
int64
0
2
text
stringlengths
13
1.91k
id
int64
0
393k
In the context of 'She always says the right thing, does the right thing, wears the right clothes.', does 'She does, says, and wears everything perfectly, consistently. ' stand alone without direct association?
0
1
She always says the right thing, does the right thing, wears the right clothes.###She does, says, and wears everything perfectly, consistently.
242
Analyze if the hypothesis is in clear contradiction to the premise. Premise: She always says the right thing, does the right thing, wears the right clothes. Hypothesis: She does, says, and wears everything perfectly, consistently.
0
2
She always says the right thing, does the right thing, wears the right clothes.###She does, says, and wears everything perfectly, consistently.
242
Does the premise 'Leave the river briefly to loop east around Talcy, with its Romanesque church and the 13th-century chateau of Thizy, before ending your trip at Montr??al.' naturally result in the hypothesis 'It is recommended that you leave river briefly before ending your trip at Montréal.'
1
0
Leave the river briefly to loop east around Talcy, with its Romanesque church and the 13th-century chateau of Thizy, before ending your trip at Montr??al.###It is recommended that you leave river briefly before ending your trip at Montréal.
243
Is there no direct logical correlation between 'Leave the river briefly to loop east around Talcy, with its Romanesque church and the 13th-century chateau of Thizy, before ending your trip at Montr??al.' and 'It is recommended that you leave river briefly before ending your trip at Montréal.', indicating neutrality?
0
1
Leave the river briefly to loop east around Talcy, with its Romanesque church and the 13th-century chateau of Thizy, before ending your trip at Montr??al.###It is recommended that you leave river briefly before ending your trip at Montréal.
243
Is 'Leave the river briefly to loop east around Talcy, with its Romanesque church and the 13th-century chateau of Thizy, before ending your trip at Montr??al.' in direct disagreement with the statement 'It is recommended that you leave river briefly before ending your trip at Montréal.'
0
2
Leave the river briefly to loop east around Talcy, with its Romanesque church and the 13th-century chateau of Thizy, before ending your trip at Montr??al.###It is recommended that you leave river briefly before ending your trip at Montréal.
243
Instruction: Does the hypothesis follow logically from the premise? Premise: yeah and i you know i think defense really is what wins wins uh in the long run you can have the best half back there is or the best quarterback but if they don't have any blocking maybe they can't do anything Hypothesis: I think a good defense is the most important thing you need to win games.
1
0
yeah and i you know i think defense really is what wins wins uh in the long run you can have the best half back there is or the best quarterback but if they don't have any blocking maybe they can't do anything###I think a good defense is the most important thing you need to win games.
244
Evaluate if the hypothesis neither contradicts nor follows from the premise. Premise: yeah and i you know i think defense really is what wins wins uh in the long run you can have the best half back there is or the best quarterback but if they don't have any blocking maybe they can't do anything Hypothesis: I think a good defense is the most important thing you need to win games.
0
1
yeah and i you know i think defense really is what wins wins uh in the long run you can have the best half back there is or the best quarterback but if they don't have any blocking maybe they can't do anything###I think a good defense is the most important thing you need to win games.
244
Given 'yeah and i you know i think defense really is what wins wins uh in the long run you can have the best half back there is or the best quarterback but if they don't have any blocking maybe they can't do anything', does 'I think a good defense is the most important thing you need to win games.' present an opposing view?
0
2
yeah and i you know i think defense really is what wins wins uh in the long run you can have the best half back there is or the best quarterback but if they don't have any blocking maybe they can't do anything###I think a good defense is the most important thing you need to win games.
244
Does 'The number of Arawak had already fallen dramatically, so the Spanish began to import slaves from Africa to work the land; the first Africans arrived in 1517.' serve to directly refute the premise presented in 'The Spanish had plenty of Arawak to use as slaves.'
1
2
The number of Arawak had already fallen dramatically, so the Spanish began to import slaves from Africa to work the land; the first Africans arrived in 1517.###The Spanish had plenty of Arawak to use as slaves.
247
Based on the premise 'The number of Arawak had already fallen dramatically, so the Spanish began to import slaves from Africa to work the land; the first Africans arrived in 1517.', does it logically lead to the hypothesis 'The Spanish had plenty of Arawak to use as slaves.'
0
0
The number of Arawak had already fallen dramatically, so the Spanish began to import slaves from Africa to work the land; the first Africans arrived in 1517.###The Spanish had plenty of Arawak to use as slaves.
247
Does 'The number of Arawak had already fallen dramatically, so the Spanish began to import slaves from Africa to work the land; the first Africans arrived in 1517.' neither support nor refute 'The Spanish had plenty of Arawak to use as slaves.', instead existing independently?
0
1
The number of Arawak had already fallen dramatically, so the Spanish began to import slaves from Africa to work the land; the first Africans arrived in 1517.###The Spanish had plenty of Arawak to use as slaves.
247
Is 'and enjoy nature and uh kind of wipe out the stress of everyday life i'd always' a fitting logical lead-up to 'I like to get out in nature and de-stress.'
1
0
and enjoy nature and uh kind of wipe out the stress of everyday life i'd always###I like to get out in nature and de-stress.
248
Given 'and enjoy nature and uh kind of wipe out the stress of everyday life i'd always', does 'I like to get out in nature and de-stress.' exist in a neutral realm, neither confirming nor denying the premise?
0
1
and enjoy nature and uh kind of wipe out the stress of everyday life i'd always###I like to get out in nature and de-stress.
248
Does 'and enjoy nature and uh kind of wipe out the stress of everyday life i'd always' stand in direct opposition to the premise 'I like to get out in nature and de-stress.'
0
2
and enjoy nature and uh kind of wipe out the stress of everyday life i'd always###I like to get out in nature and de-stress.
248
In relation to 'I'd call it a bad date.', does 'I'd consider it a bad date because the girl was rude to the waiter.' represent a neutral and unrelated viewpoint?
1
1
I'd call it a bad date.###I'd consider it a bad date because the girl was rude to the waiter.
251
Given the premise, is the hypothesis an unavoidable conclusion? Premise: I'd call it a bad date. Hypothesis: I'd consider it a bad date because the girl was rude to the waiter.
0
0
I'd call it a bad date.###I'd consider it a bad date because the girl was rude to the waiter.
251
Does 'I'd call it a bad date.' stand in direct opposition to the premise 'I'd consider it a bad date because the girl was rude to the waiter.'
0
2
I'd call it a bad date.###I'd consider it a bad date because the girl was rude to the waiter.
251
If 'Traditionally a poor island, the native population has happily embraced the new seasonal lifestyle that has brought them proserity, and the old ways have almost completely disappeared.' is true, does it logically mean that 'The old ways of the native population has almost completely faded away.' also is?
1
0
Traditionally a poor island, the native population has happily embraced the new seasonal lifestyle that has brought them proserity, and the old ways have almost completely disappeared.###The old ways of the native population has almost completely faded away.
252
Does 'Traditionally a poor island, the native population has happily embraced the new seasonal lifestyle that has brought them proserity, and the old ways have almost completely disappeared.' neither support nor refute 'The old ways of the native population has almost completely faded away.', instead existing independently?
0
1
Traditionally a poor island, the native population has happily embraced the new seasonal lifestyle that has brought them proserity, and the old ways have almost completely disappeared.###The old ways of the native population has almost completely faded away.
252
In relation to 'Traditionally a poor island, the native population has happily embraced the new seasonal lifestyle that has brought them proserity, and the old ways have almost completely disappeared.', does 'The old ways of the native population has almost completely faded away.' express a contradictory stance?
0
2
Traditionally a poor island, the native population has happily embraced the new seasonal lifestyle that has brought them proserity, and the old ways have almost completely disappeared.###The old ways of the native population has almost completely faded away.
252
Is there a neutral relationship between 'For adventurous travelers looking for an introduction to the South, the rewards are rich.' and 'For those who prefer more safety, other options are available.', lacking direct logical ties?
1
1
For adventurous travelers looking for an introduction to the South, the rewards are rich.###For those who prefer more safety, other options are available.
253
With the premise 'For adventurous travelers looking for an introduction to the South, the rewards are rich.', is 'For those who prefer more safety, other options are available.' a logical derivative?
0
0
For adventurous travelers looking for an introduction to the South, the rewards are rich.###For those who prefer more safety, other options are available.
253
Given 'For adventurous travelers looking for an introduction to the South, the rewards are rich.', is 'For those who prefer more safety, other options are available.' its antithesis?
0
2
For adventurous travelers looking for an introduction to the South, the rewards are rich.###For those who prefer more safety, other options are available.
253
Evaluate if the hypothesis neither contradicts nor follows from the premise. Premise: It covers most but not all close Senate and gubernatorial races.) Hypothesis: The radio station covers most close gubernatorial races
1
1
It covers most but not all close Senate and gubernatorial races.)###The radio station covers most close gubernatorial races
254
With the premise 'It covers most but not all close Senate and gubernatorial races.)', is 'The radio station covers most close gubernatorial races' a reasonable conclusion?
0
0
It covers most but not all close Senate and gubernatorial races.)###The radio station covers most close gubernatorial races
254
Does the hypothesis 'It covers most but not all close Senate and gubernatorial races.)' logically conflict with the premise 'The radio station covers most close gubernatorial races'
0
2
It covers most but not all close Senate and gubernatorial races.)###The radio station covers most close gubernatorial races
254
Does 'The component may also be a contractor.' serve to directly refute the premise presented in 'They were prohibited from being a contractor.'
1
2
The component may also be a contractor.###They were prohibited from being a contractor.
255
Considering 'The component may also be a contractor.', can one logically arrive at 'They were prohibited from being a contractor.'
0
0
The component may also be a contractor.###They were prohibited from being a contractor.
255
Given the statement 'The component may also be a contractor.', is 'They were prohibited from being a contractor.' neither a logical follow-up nor a contradiction?
0
1
The component may also be a contractor.###They were prohibited from being a contractor.
255
Instruction: Is the hypothesis unrelated or neutral to the premise? Premise: The point is not that investing in foreign companies is necessarily a mistake. Hypothesis: Putting money into foreign companies poses a great risk.
1
1
The point is not that investing in foreign companies is necessarily a mistake.###Putting money into foreign companies poses a great risk.
256
Does the narrative of 'The point is not that investing in foreign companies is necessarily a mistake.' logically evolve into 'Putting money into foreign companies poses a great risk.'
0
0
The point is not that investing in foreign companies is necessarily a mistake.###Putting money into foreign companies poses a great risk.
256
Given 'The point is not that investing in foreign companies is necessarily a mistake.', is 'Putting money into foreign companies poses a great risk.' its antithesis?
0
2
The point is not that investing in foreign companies is necessarily a mistake.###Putting money into foreign companies poses a great risk.
256
Consider the premise. Does the hypothesis stand independently without contradicting or following it? Premise: Currently OASI and DI make payments to that Account, and HI receives payment. Hypothesis: The Account is the easiest way to keep track of payments made by OASI and DI on an annual basis.
1
1
Currently OASI and DI make payments to that Account, and HI receives payment.###The Account is the easiest way to keep track of payments made by OASI and DI on an annual basis.
257
From 'Currently OASI and DI make payments to that Account, and HI receives payment.', can we infer that 'The Account is the easiest way to keep track of payments made by OASI and DI on an annual basis.' follows logically?
0
0
Currently OASI and DI make payments to that Account, and HI receives payment.###The Account is the easiest way to keep track of payments made by OASI and DI on an annual basis.
257
Does the statement 'Currently OASI and DI make payments to that Account, and HI receives payment.' conflict with the idea presented in 'The Account is the easiest way to keep track of payments made by OASI and DI on an annual basis.'
0
2
Currently OASI and DI make payments to that Account, and HI receives payment.###The Account is the easiest way to keep track of payments made by OASI and DI on an annual basis.
257
Does 'In addition to the effects on household saving choices, individual accounts may also affect the relationship and interactions between Social Security and private pensions.' neither support nor refute 'Individual accounts would reduce demand for private pensions.', instead existing independently?
1
1
In addition to the effects on household saving choices, individual accounts may also affect the relationship and interactions between Social Security and private pensions.###Individual accounts would reduce demand for private pensions.
258
Starting from 'In addition to the effects on household saving choices, individual accounts may also affect the relationship and interactions between Social Security and private pensions.', does it naturally lead to the conclusion 'Individual accounts would reduce demand for private pensions.'
0
0
In addition to the effects on household saving choices, individual accounts may also affect the relationship and interactions between Social Security and private pensions.###Individual accounts would reduce demand for private pensions.
258
Does 'In addition to the effects on household saving choices, individual accounts may also affect the relationship and interactions between Social Security and private pensions.' logically negate the premise 'Individual accounts would reduce demand for private pensions.'
0
2
In addition to the effects on household saving choices, individual accounts may also affect the relationship and interactions between Social Security and private pensions.###Individual accounts would reduce demand for private pensions.
258
Does 'Washington Post reports two attempts by private companies to grow embryos--a practice banned among federally funded researchers but allowed in the private sector.' stand independently of the premise 'The Washington Post was the first company to report on attempts of private companies growing embryos.', neither following nor contradicting it?
1
1
Washington Post reports two attempts by private companies to grow embryos--a practice banned among federally funded researchers but allowed in the private sector.###The Washington Post was the first company to report on attempts of private companies growing embryos.
259
Given 'Washington Post reports two attempts by private companies to grow embryos--a practice banned among federally funded researchers but allowed in the private sector.', would 'The Washington Post was the first company to report on attempts of private companies growing embryos.' be a logical outcome?
0
0
Washington Post reports two attempts by private companies to grow embryos--a practice banned among federally funded researchers but allowed in the private sector.###The Washington Post was the first company to report on attempts of private companies growing embryos.
259
Given 'Washington Post reports two attempts by private companies to grow embryos--a practice banned among federally funded researchers but allowed in the private sector.', is 'The Washington Post was the first company to report on attempts of private companies growing embryos.' its antithesis?
0
2
Washington Post reports two attempts by private companies to grow embryos--a practice banned among federally funded researchers but allowed in the private sector.###The Washington Post was the first company to report on attempts of private companies growing embryos.
259
If we start with 'a plausible increase in the penetration of computer ownership by households over the course of a single year.', does it make sense to conclude with 'Computer ownership by households usually increases in a year.'
1
0
a plausible increase in the penetration of computer ownership by households over the course of a single year.###Computer ownership by households usually increases in a year.
260
In the context of 'a plausible increase in the penetration of computer ownership by households over the course of a single year.', does 'Computer ownership by households usually increases in a year.' stand alone without direct association?
0
1
a plausible increase in the penetration of computer ownership by households over the course of a single year.###Computer ownership by households usually increases in a year.
260
Does 'a plausible increase in the penetration of computer ownership by households over the course of a single year.' challenge or dispute the premise 'Computer ownership by households usually increases in a year.'
0
2
a plausible increase in the penetration of computer ownership by households over the course of a single year.###Computer ownership by households usually increases in a year.
260
Instruction: Is the hypothesis unrelated or neutral to the premise? Premise: But the explanation is institutional, not ideological. Hypothesis: Many experts have argued that it's impossible to separate the institutional from the ideological in the circumstances.
1
1
But the explanation is institutional, not ideological.###Many experts have argued that it's impossible to separate the institutional from the ideological in the circumstances.
261
Starting from 'But the explanation is institutional, not ideological.', does it naturally lead to the conclusion 'Many experts have argued that it's impossible to separate the institutional from the ideological in the circumstances.'
0
0
But the explanation is institutional, not ideological.###Many experts have argued that it's impossible to separate the institutional from the ideological in the circumstances.
261
Does 'But the explanation is institutional, not ideological.' provide a contradiction to the established premise 'Many experts have argued that it's impossible to separate the institutional from the ideological in the circumstances.'
0
2
But the explanation is institutional, not ideological.###Many experts have argued that it's impossible to separate the institutional from the ideological in the circumstances.
261
If 'You and Tuppence have been sticking together like Siamese twins.' is true, does it logically mean that 'You and Tuppence have been hand in glove.' also is?
1
0
You and Tuppence have been sticking together like Siamese twins.###You and Tuppence have been hand in glove.
262
From 'You and Tuppence have been sticking together like Siamese twins.', can we conclude that 'You and Tuppence have been hand in glove.' is unrelated and maintains neutrality?
0
1
You and Tuppence have been sticking together like Siamese twins.###You and Tuppence have been hand in glove.
262
In relation to 'You and Tuppence have been sticking together like Siamese twins.', does 'You and Tuppence have been hand in glove.' express a contradictory stance?
0
2
You and Tuppence have been sticking together like Siamese twins.###You and Tuppence have been hand in glove.
262
Given the context of 'Below the Rond-Point, the mood changes and a pleasant park leads you past two the Petit Palais, all steel and glass, and the Grand Palais.', does 'The mood changes below the Rond-Point, and a pleasant park leads you past two the Petit Palais, all steel and glass, and the Grand Palais.' emerge logically?
1
0
Below the Rond-Point, the mood changes and a pleasant park leads you past two the Petit Palais, all steel and glass, and the Grand Palais.###The mood changes below the Rond-Point, and a pleasant park leads you past two the Petit Palais, all steel and glass, and the Grand Palais.
263
Considering 'Below the Rond-Point, the mood changes and a pleasant park leads you past two the Petit Palais, all steel and glass, and the Grand Palais.', does 'The mood changes below the Rond-Point, and a pleasant park leads you past two the Petit Palais, all steel and glass, and the Grand Palais.' maintain an independent stance?
0
1
Below the Rond-Point, the mood changes and a pleasant park leads you past two the Petit Palais, all steel and glass, and the Grand Palais.###The mood changes below the Rond-Point, and a pleasant park leads you past two the Petit Palais, all steel and glass, and the Grand Palais.
263
Analyze if the hypothesis is in clear contradiction to the premise. Premise: Below the Rond-Point, the mood changes and a pleasant park leads you past two the Petit Palais, all steel and glass, and the Grand Palais. Hypothesis: The mood changes below the Rond-Point, and a pleasant park leads you past two the Petit Palais, all steel and glass, and the Grand Palais.
0
2
Below the Rond-Point, the mood changes and a pleasant park leads you past two the Petit Palais, all steel and glass, and the Grand Palais.###The mood changes below the Rond-Point, and a pleasant park leads you past two the Petit Palais, all steel and glass, and the Grand Palais.
263
Given the premise, is the hypothesis maintaining a neutral stance? Premise: Participants generally agreed that improvements in corporate governance will bring about improvements in auditing. Hypothesis: The participants only agreed on a few subjects.
1
1
Participants generally agreed that improvements in corporate governance will bring about improvements in auditing.###The participants only agreed on a few subjects.
264
Is 'Participants generally agreed that improvements in corporate governance will bring about improvements in auditing.' a fitting logical lead-up to 'The participants only agreed on a few subjects.'
0
0
Participants generally agreed that improvements in corporate governance will bring about improvements in auditing.###The participants only agreed on a few subjects.
264
Given the premise, is the hypothesis presenting a conflicting viewpoint? Premise: Participants generally agreed that improvements in corporate governance will bring about improvements in auditing. Hypothesis: The participants only agreed on a few subjects.
0
2
Participants generally agreed that improvements in corporate governance will bring about improvements in auditing.###The participants only agreed on a few subjects.
264
Is the premise sufficiently strong to logically lead to the hypothesis? Premise: AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING Hypothesis: Granting permission.
1
0
AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING ###Granting permission.
265
Does 'AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING ' neither support nor refute 'Granting permission.', instead existing independently?
0
1
AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING ###Granting permission.
265
Does 'AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING ' challenge or dispute the premise 'Granting permission.'
0
2
AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING ###Granting permission.
265
Considering the premise 'Ever see a contemplative Power Ranger?', is 'Ever see a Power Ranger consider the consequences of their actions?' a statement that stands on its own?
1
1
Ever see a contemplative Power Ranger?###Ever see a Power Ranger consider the consequences of their actions?
266
Given 'Ever see a contemplative Power Ranger?', would 'Ever see a Power Ranger consider the consequences of their actions?' be a logical outcome?
0
0
Ever see a contemplative Power Ranger?###Ever see a Power Ranger consider the consequences of their actions?
266
In the context of 'Ever see a contemplative Power Ranger?', does 'Ever see a Power Ranger consider the consequences of their actions?' serve as a direct counterargument?
0
2
Ever see a contemplative Power Ranger?###Ever see a Power Ranger consider the consequences of their actions?
266
Is there a fundamental disagreement between 'However, I believe that additional actions by the board and AICPA management will be needed to restore trust and confidence in the Institute over the longer-term.' and 'Trust and confidence in the Institute have been lost forever.'
1
2
However, I believe that additional actions by the board and AICPA management will be needed to restore trust and confidence in the Institute over the longer-term.###Trust and confidence in the Institute have been lost forever.
267
Is 'However, I believe that additional actions by the board and AICPA management will be needed to restore trust and confidence in the Institute over the longer-term.' a logical precursor to the hypothesis 'Trust and confidence in the Institute have been lost forever.'
0
0
However, I believe that additional actions by the board and AICPA management will be needed to restore trust and confidence in the Institute over the longer-term.###Trust and confidence in the Institute have been lost forever.
267
In the context of 'However, I believe that additional actions by the board and AICPA management will be needed to restore trust and confidence in the Institute over the longer-term.', does 'Trust and confidence in the Institute have been lost forever.' stand alone without direct association?
0
1
However, I believe that additional actions by the board and AICPA management will be needed to restore trust and confidence in the Institute over the longer-term.###Trust and confidence in the Institute have been lost forever.
267
Does 'Every tube contained a body, and every body was a famous figure from history.' offer a contrasting position to 'The tubes held everyday people.'
1
2
Every tube contained a body, and every body was a famous figure from history.###The tubes held everyday people.
268
From 'Every tube contained a body, and every body was a famous figure from history.', can we infer that 'The tubes held everyday people.' follows logically?
0
0
Every tube contained a body, and every body was a famous figure from history.###The tubes held everyday people.
268
Given 'Every tube contained a body, and every body was a famous figure from history.', can 'The tubes held everyday people.' be seen as maintaining a distinct, neutral position?
0
1
Every tube contained a body, and every body was a famous figure from history.###The tubes held everyday people.
268
Is there a direct logical conflict between the premise and the hypothesis? Premise: Four sikhara domes rise above the entrance-porch in addition the mandapa hall for worshippers; a larger hall for dancing-girls; and the inner sanctuary, surrounded by an ambulatory for walking around the image of the deity. Hypothesis: Visitors are not permitted to walk around the image of the deity, but must sit quietly in front of it.
1
2
Four sikhara domes rise above the entrance-porch in addition the mandapa hall for worshippers; a larger hall for dancing-girls; and the inner sanctuary, surrounded by an ambulatory for walking around the image of the deity.###Visitors are not permitted to walk around the image of the deity, but must sit quietly in front of it.
269
Analyze if the hypothesis is a logical continuation of the premise. Premise: Four sikhara domes rise above the entrance-porch in addition the mandapa hall for worshippers; a larger hall for dancing-girls; and the inner sanctuary, surrounded by an ambulatory for walking around the image of the deity. Hypothesis: Visitors are not permitted to walk around the image of the deity, but must sit quietly in front of it.
0
0
Four sikhara domes rise above the entrance-porch in addition the mandapa hall for worshippers; a larger hall for dancing-girls; and the inner sanctuary, surrounded by an ambulatory for walking around the image of the deity.###Visitors are not permitted to walk around the image of the deity, but must sit quietly in front of it.
269
Given 'Four sikhara domes rise above the entrance-porch in addition the mandapa hall for worshippers; a larger hall for dancing-girls; and the inner sanctuary, surrounded by an ambulatory for walking around the image of the deity.', does 'Visitors are not permitted to walk around the image of the deity, but must sit quietly in front of it.' exist in a neutral realm, neither confirming nor denying the premise?
0
1
Four sikhara domes rise above the entrance-porch in addition the mandapa hall for worshippers; a larger hall for dancing-girls; and the inner sanctuary, surrounded by an ambulatory for walking around the image of the deity.###Visitors are not permitted to walk around the image of the deity, but must sit quietly in front of it.
269
Considering 'The great Kanto earthquake of 1923 destroyed some 60,000 homes in Yokohama and took over 20,000 lives.', does 'Yokohama took a long time to recover from the earthquake.' maintain an independent stance?
1
1
The great Kanto earthquake of 1923 destroyed some 60,000 homes in Yokohama and took over 20,000 lives.###Yokohama took a long time to recover from the earthquake.
270
With the premise 'The great Kanto earthquake of 1923 destroyed some 60,000 homes in Yokohama and took over 20,000 lives.', is 'Yokohama took a long time to recover from the earthquake.' a reasonable conclusion?
0
0
The great Kanto earthquake of 1923 destroyed some 60,000 homes in Yokohama and took over 20,000 lives.###Yokohama took a long time to recover from the earthquake.
270
Does the statement 'The great Kanto earthquake of 1923 destroyed some 60,000 homes in Yokohama and took over 20,000 lives.' conflict with the idea presented in 'Yokohama took a long time to recover from the earthquake.'
0
2
The great Kanto earthquake of 1923 destroyed some 60,000 homes in Yokohama and took over 20,000 lives.###Yokohama took a long time to recover from the earthquake.
270
Instruction: Does the hypothesis follow logically from the premise? Premise: oh was that good i heard oh okay Hypothesis: Yes, I heard that was really good.
1
0
oh was that good i heard oh okay###Yes, I heard that was really good.
271
Can 'oh was that good i heard oh okay' be viewed as neither a logical extension nor a contradiction of 'Yes, I heard that was really good.'
0
1
oh was that good i heard oh okay###Yes, I heard that was really good.
271
Is there an overt contradiction between 'oh was that good i heard oh okay' and 'Yes, I heard that was really good.'
0
2
oh was that good i heard oh okay###Yes, I heard that was really good.
271
Taking 'The only adult males allowed in the Harem were the Black Eunuchs, who were in charge of security and administration.' as a given, does it logically imply 'The Black Eunuchs were responsible for the security and administration of the Harem.'
1
0
The only adult males allowed in the Harem were the Black Eunuchs, who were in charge of security and administration.###The Black Eunuchs were responsible for the security and administration of the Harem.
272
Does the connection between 'The only adult males allowed in the Harem were the Black Eunuchs, who were in charge of security and administration.' and 'The Black Eunuchs were responsible for the security and administration of the Harem.' lack any definitive logical relationship?
0
1
The only adult males allowed in the Harem were the Black Eunuchs, who were in charge of security and administration.###The Black Eunuchs were responsible for the security and administration of the Harem.
272
Given the assertion 'The only adult males allowed in the Harem were the Black Eunuchs, who were in charge of security and administration.', does 'The Black Eunuchs were responsible for the security and administration of the Harem.' offer a contrary position?
0
2
The only adult males allowed in the Harem were the Black Eunuchs, who were in charge of security and administration.###The Black Eunuchs were responsible for the security and administration of the Harem.
272
Is there a direct logical conflict between the premise and the hypothesis? Premise: Due to the amount of information now available, power has shifted from the physician to the patient. Hypothesis: Doctors have more power than ever thanks to better data availability.
1
2
Due to the amount of information now available, power has shifted from the physician to the patient.###Doctors have more power than ever thanks to better data availability.
273
Is 'Due to the amount of information now available, power has shifted from the physician to the patient.' a fitting logical lead-up to 'Doctors have more power than ever thanks to better data availability.'
0
0
Due to the amount of information now available, power has shifted from the physician to the patient.###Doctors have more power than ever thanks to better data availability.
273
Is 'Due to the amount of information now available, power has shifted from the physician to the patient.' an autonomous statement, not logically connected to 'Doctors have more power than ever thanks to better data availability.'
0
1
Due to the amount of information now available, power has shifted from the physician to the patient.###Doctors have more power than ever thanks to better data availability.
273
Is 'i know i am um i don't know anybody in their right mind that says that that i'm doing it because i want to i' in direct disagreement with the statement 'I know there are people who think I'm doing it because I desire to.'
1
2
i know i am um i don't know anybody in their right mind that says that that i'm doing it because i want to i###I know there are people who think I'm doing it because I desire to.
274
Given the context of 'i know i am um i don't know anybody in their right mind that says that that i'm doing it because i want to i', does 'I know there are people who think I'm doing it because I desire to.' emerge logically?
0
0
i know i am um i don't know anybody in their right mind that says that that i'm doing it because i want to i###I know there are people who think I'm doing it because I desire to.
274
Is 'i know i am um i don't know anybody in their right mind that says that that i'm doing it because i want to i' an autonomous statement, not logically connected to 'I know there are people who think I'm doing it because I desire to.'
0
1
i know i am um i don't know anybody in their right mind that says that that i'm doing it because i want to i###I know there are people who think I'm doing it because I desire to.
274
Is 'Isn't that America's last bastion of mobsters, racists, and hacks?' in direct disagreement with the statement 'It's America's first wave of racists. '
1
2
Isn't that America's last bastion of mobsters, racists, and hacks?###It's America's first wave of racists.
275
From 'Isn't that America's last bastion of mobsters, racists, and hacks?', can we infer that 'It's America's first wave of racists. ' follows logically?
0
0
Isn't that America's last bastion of mobsters, racists, and hacks?###It's America's first wave of racists.
275
Considering the premise 'Isn't that America's last bastion of mobsters, racists, and hacks?', is 'It's America's first wave of racists. ' a statement that stands on its own?
0
1
Isn't that America's last bastion of mobsters, racists, and hacks?###It's America's first wave of racists.
275
Is there a neutral relationship between 'Let me try it." She began snapping her fingers and saying the word eagerly, but nothing happened.' and 'She became frustrated when the spell didn't work. ', lacking direct logical ties?
1
1
Let me try it." She began snapping her fingers and saying the word eagerly, but nothing happened.###She became frustrated when the spell didn't work.
276
Is 'Let me try it." She began snapping her fingers and saying the word eagerly, but nothing happened.' a logical precursor to the hypothesis 'She became frustrated when the spell didn't work. '
0
0
Let me try it." She began snapping her fingers and saying the word eagerly, but nothing happened.###She became frustrated when the spell didn't work.
276
Does 'Let me try it." She began snapping her fingers and saying the word eagerly, but nothing happened.' serve to directly refute the premise presented in 'She became frustrated when the spell didn't work. '
0
2
Let me try it." She began snapping her fingers and saying the word eagerly, but nothing happened.###She became frustrated when the spell didn't work.
276
Is 'There is also an archaeological museum that displays older relics, including examples of Mycenaean pottery.' in direct disagreement with the statement 'The museum is completely empty and doesn't have anything in it.'
1
2
There is also an archaeological museum that displays older relics, including examples of Mycenaean pottery.###The museum is completely empty and doesn't have anything in it.
277
Does accepting 'There is also an archaeological museum that displays older relics, including examples of Mycenaean pottery.' as true logically compel one to accept 'The museum is completely empty and doesn't have anything in it.'
0
0
There is also an archaeological museum that displays older relics, including examples of Mycenaean pottery.###The museum is completely empty and doesn't have anything in it.
277
Does 'There is also an archaeological museum that displays older relics, including examples of Mycenaean pottery.' neither support nor refute 'The museum is completely empty and doesn't have anything in it.', instead existing independently?
0
1
There is also an archaeological museum that displays older relics, including examples of Mycenaean pottery.###The museum is completely empty and doesn't have anything in it.
277
Does 'There are nonetheless a number of practices and alternative strategies that senior executives in leading organizations use to help define and institute their CIO positions to effectively meet business needs.' offer a contrasting position to 'There are no practices and strategies that can help CIO positions to meet business needs at the moment.'
1
2
There are nonetheless a number of practices and alternative strategies that senior executives in leading organizations use to help define and institute their CIO positions to effectively meet business needs.###There are no practices and strategies that can help CIO positions to meet business needs at the moment.
278
Considering 'There are nonetheless a number of practices and alternative strategies that senior executives in leading organizations use to help define and institute their CIO positions to effectively meet business needs.', can one logically arrive at 'There are no practices and strategies that can help CIO positions to meet business needs at the moment.'
0
0
There are nonetheless a number of practices and alternative strategies that senior executives in leading organizations use to help define and institute their CIO positions to effectively meet business needs.###There are no practices and strategies that can help CIO positions to meet business needs at the moment.
278
In relation to 'There are nonetheless a number of practices and alternative strategies that senior executives in leading organizations use to help define and institute their CIO positions to effectively meet business needs.', does 'There are no practices and strategies that can help CIO positions to meet business needs at the moment.' represent a neutral and unrelated viewpoint?
0
1
There are nonetheless a number of practices and alternative strategies that senior executives in leading organizations use to help define and institute their CIO positions to effectively meet business needs.###There are no practices and strategies that can help CIO positions to meet business needs at the moment.
278
Does 'By one estimate, Russia's economic output would more than double if the Russians simply sold off their natural resources instead of trying to make something out of them.' exist in a separate context from 'It is possible that Putin wants to develop the financial independence and work skills of Russians and the loss of money in less profit to merely selling off materials is worth the manufacturing expertise gained by his people as they create goods within their own country. ', without logical interdependence?
1
1
By one estimate, Russia's economic output would more than double if the Russians simply sold off their natural resources instead of trying to make something out of them.###It is possible that Putin wants to develop the financial independence and work skills of Russians and the loss of money in less profit to merely selling off materials is worth the manufacturing expertise gained by his people as they create goods within their own country.
279
Is the premise sufficiently strong to logically lead to the hypothesis? Premise: By one estimate, Russia's economic output would more than double if the Russians simply sold off their natural resources instead of trying to make something out of them. Hypothesis: It is possible that Putin wants to develop the financial independence and work skills of Russians and the loss of money in less profit to merely selling off materials is worth the manufacturing expertise gained by his people as they create goods within their own country.
0
0
By one estimate, Russia's economic output would more than double if the Russians simply sold off their natural resources instead of trying to make something out of them.###It is possible that Putin wants to develop the financial independence and work skills of Russians and the loss of money in less profit to merely selling off materials is worth the manufacturing expertise gained by his people as they create goods within their own country.
279