input
stringlengths 833
15.3k
| output
stringlengths 2
16
| instruction
stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|
risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector in recent years . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 301.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>53.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>56.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>194.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2012</td><td>410.0</td></tr></table> our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .
Question: what was the change in pre-tax catastrophe losses from 2015 to 2016?
| 247.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector in recent years . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 301.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>53.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>56.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>194.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2012</td><td>410.0</td></tr></table> our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .
Question: what was the change in pre-tax catastrophe losses from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 247.4
Question: and what was the total of pre-tax catastrophe losses in 2015?
| 53.8 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector in recent years . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 301.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>53.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2014</td><td>56.3</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2013</td><td>194.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2012</td><td>410.0</td></tr></table> our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .
Question: what was the change in pre-tax catastrophe losses from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 247.4
Question: and what was the total of pre-tax catastrophe losses in 2015?
Answer: 53.8
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this total, in percentage?
| 4.59851 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
welltower inc . notes to consolidated financial statements is no longer present ( and additional weight may be given to subjective evidence such as our projections for growth ) . the valuation allowance rollforward is summarized as follows for the periods presented ( in thousands ) : year ended december 31 , 2017 2016 2015 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>year ended december 31 2017 2016</td><td>year ended december 31 2017 2016</td><td>year ended december 31 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 96838</td><td>$ 98966</td><td>$ 85207</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expense ( benefit )</td><td>30445</td><td>-2128 ( 2128 )</td><td>13759</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 127283</td><td>$ 96838</td><td>$ 98966</td></tr></table> as a result of certain acquisitions , we are subject to corporate level taxes for any related asset dispositions that may occur during the five-year period immediately after such assets were owned by a c corporation ( 201cbuilt-in gains tax 201d ) . the amount of income potentially subject to this special corporate level tax is generally equal to the lesser of ( a ) the excess of the fair value of the asset over its adjusted tax basis as of the date it became a reit asset , or ( b ) the actual amount of gain . some but not all gains recognized during this period of time could be offset by available net operating losses and capital loss carryforwards . during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , we acquired certain additional assets with built-in gains as of the date of acquisition that could be subject to the built-in gains tax if disposed of prior to the expiration of the applicable ten-year period . we have not recorded a deferred tax liability as a result of the potential built-in gains tax based on our intentions with respect to such properties and available tax planning strategies . under the provisions of the reit investment diversification and empowerment act of 2007 ( 201cridea 201d ) , for taxable years beginning after july 30 , 2008 , the reit may lease 201cqualified health care properties 201d on an arm 2019s-length basis to a trs if the property is operated on behalf of such subsidiary by a person who qualifies as an 201celigible independent contractor . 201d generally , the rent received from the trs will meet the related party rent exception and will be treated as 201crents from real property . 201d a 201cqualified health care property 201d includes real property and any personal property that is , or is necessary or incidental to the use of , a hospital , nursing facility , assisted living facility , congregate care facility , qualified continuing care facility , or other licensed facility which extends medical or nursing or ancillary services to patients . we have entered into various joint ventures that were structured under ridea . resident level rents and related operating expenses for these facilities are reported in the consolidated financial statements and are subject to federal , state and foreign income taxes as the operations of such facilities are included in a trs . certain net operating loss carryforwards could be utilized to offset taxable income in future years . given the applicable statute of limitations , we generally are subject to audit by the internal revenue service ( 201cirs 201d ) for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and subsequent years . the statute of limitations may vary in the states in which we own properties or conduct business . we do not expect to be subject to audit by state taxing authorities for any year prior to the year ended december 31 , 2011 . we are also subject to audit by the canada revenue agency and provincial authorities generally for periods subsequent to may 2012 related to entities acquired or formed in connection with acquisitions , and by the u.k . 2019s hm revenue & customs for periods subsequent to august 2012 related to entities acquired or formed in connection with acquisitions . at december 31 , 2017 , we had a net operating loss ( 201cnol 201d ) carryforward related to the reit of $ 448475000 . due to our uncertainty regarding the realization of certain deferred tax assets , we have not recorded a deferred tax asset related to nols generated by the reit . these amounts can be used to offset future taxable income ( and/or taxable income for prior years if an audit determines that tax is owed ) , if any . the reit will be entitled to utilize nols and tax credit carryforwards only to the extent that reit taxable income exceeds our deduction for dividends paid . the nol carryforwards generated through december 31 , 2017 will expire through 2036 . beginning with tax years after december 31 , 2017 , the tax cuts and jobs act ( 201ctax act 201d ) eliminates the carryback period , limits the nols to 80% ( 80 % ) of taxable income and replaces the 20-year carryforward period with an indefinite carryforward period. .
Question: what is the change in the balance valuation allowance rollforward during 2017 as a percentage of the beginning balance in that year?
| 0.31439 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
welltower inc . notes to consolidated financial statements is no longer present ( and additional weight may be given to subjective evidence such as our projections for growth ) . the valuation allowance rollforward is summarized as follows for the periods presented ( in thousands ) : year ended december 31 , 2017 2016 2015 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>year ended december 31 2017 2016</td><td>year ended december 31 2017 2016</td><td>year ended december 31 2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 96838</td><td>$ 98966</td><td>$ 85207</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>expense ( benefit )</td><td>30445</td><td>-2128 ( 2128 )</td><td>13759</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 127283</td><td>$ 96838</td><td>$ 98966</td></tr></table> as a result of certain acquisitions , we are subject to corporate level taxes for any related asset dispositions that may occur during the five-year period immediately after such assets were owned by a c corporation ( 201cbuilt-in gains tax 201d ) . the amount of income potentially subject to this special corporate level tax is generally equal to the lesser of ( a ) the excess of the fair value of the asset over its adjusted tax basis as of the date it became a reit asset , or ( b ) the actual amount of gain . some but not all gains recognized during this period of time could be offset by available net operating losses and capital loss carryforwards . during the year ended december 31 , 2016 , we acquired certain additional assets with built-in gains as of the date of acquisition that could be subject to the built-in gains tax if disposed of prior to the expiration of the applicable ten-year period . we have not recorded a deferred tax liability as a result of the potential built-in gains tax based on our intentions with respect to such properties and available tax planning strategies . under the provisions of the reit investment diversification and empowerment act of 2007 ( 201cridea 201d ) , for taxable years beginning after july 30 , 2008 , the reit may lease 201cqualified health care properties 201d on an arm 2019s-length basis to a trs if the property is operated on behalf of such subsidiary by a person who qualifies as an 201celigible independent contractor . 201d generally , the rent received from the trs will meet the related party rent exception and will be treated as 201crents from real property . 201d a 201cqualified health care property 201d includes real property and any personal property that is , or is necessary or incidental to the use of , a hospital , nursing facility , assisted living facility , congregate care facility , qualified continuing care facility , or other licensed facility which extends medical or nursing or ancillary services to patients . we have entered into various joint ventures that were structured under ridea . resident level rents and related operating expenses for these facilities are reported in the consolidated financial statements and are subject to federal , state and foreign income taxes as the operations of such facilities are included in a trs . certain net operating loss carryforwards could be utilized to offset taxable income in future years . given the applicable statute of limitations , we generally are subject to audit by the internal revenue service ( 201cirs 201d ) for the year ended december 31 , 2014 and subsequent years . the statute of limitations may vary in the states in which we own properties or conduct business . we do not expect to be subject to audit by state taxing authorities for any year prior to the year ended december 31 , 2011 . we are also subject to audit by the canada revenue agency and provincial authorities generally for periods subsequent to may 2012 related to entities acquired or formed in connection with acquisitions , and by the u.k . 2019s hm revenue & customs for periods subsequent to august 2012 related to entities acquired or formed in connection with acquisitions . at december 31 , 2017 , we had a net operating loss ( 201cnol 201d ) carryforward related to the reit of $ 448475000 . due to our uncertainty regarding the realization of certain deferred tax assets , we have not recorded a deferred tax asset related to nols generated by the reit . these amounts can be used to offset future taxable income ( and/or taxable income for prior years if an audit determines that tax is owed ) , if any . the reit will be entitled to utilize nols and tax credit carryforwards only to the extent that reit taxable income exceeds our deduction for dividends paid . the nol carryforwards generated through december 31 , 2017 will expire through 2036 . beginning with tax years after december 31 , 2017 , the tax cuts and jobs act ( 201ctax act 201d ) eliminates the carryback period , limits the nols to 80% ( 80 % ) of taxable income and replaces the 20-year carryforward period with an indefinite carryforward period. .
Question: what is the change in the balance valuation allowance rollforward during 2017 as a percentage of the beginning balance in that year?
Answer: 0.31439
Question: and what it is for the year 2016?
| -0.0215 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the grant-date fair value of the award will be estimated using option-pricing models . in addition , certain tax effects of stock option exercises will be reported as a financing activity rather than an operating activity in the statements of cash flows . we adopted sfas 123r on january 1 , 2006 under the retrospective transition method using the black-scholes pricing model . the effect of expensing stock options under a fair value approach using the black-scholes pricing model on diluted earnings per common share for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 is disclosed on page 69 . in addition , the classification of cash inflows from any excess tax benefit associated with exercising stock options will change from an operating activity to a financing activity in the consolidated statements of cash flows with no impact on total cash flows . we estimate the impact of this change in classification will decrease operating cash flows ( and increase financing cash flows ) by approximately $ 15.5 million in 2005 , $ 3.7 million in 2004 , and $ 15.2 million in 2003 . stock option expense after adopting sfas 123r is not expected to be materially different than our pro forma disclosure on page 69 and is dependent on levels of stock options granted during 2006 . 3 . acquisitions in january 2006 , our commercial segment reached an agreement to acquire cha service company , or cha health , a health plan serving employer groups in kentucky , for cash consideration of approximately $ 60.0 million plus any excess statutory surplus . this transaction , which is subject to regulatory approval , is expected to close effective in the second quarter of 2006 . on december 20 , 2005 , our commercial segment acquired corphealth , inc. , or corphealth , a behavioral health care management company , for cash consideration of approximately $ 54.2 million , including transaction costs . this acquisition allows humana to integrate coverage of medical and behavior health benefits . net tangible assets acquired of $ 6.0 million primarily consisted of cash and cash equivalents . the purchase price exceeded the estimated fair value of the net tangible assets acquired by approximately $ 48.2 million . we preliminarily allocated this excess purchase price to other intangible assets of $ 8.6 million and associated deferred tax liabilities of $ 3.2 million , and non-deductible goodwill of $ 42.8 million . the other intangible assets , which consist primarily of customer contracts , have a weighted average useful life of 14.7 years . the allocation is subject to change pending completion of the valuation by a third party valuation specialist firm assisting us in evaluating the fair value of the assets acquired . on february 16 , 2005 , our government segment acquired careplus health plans of florida , or careplus , as well as its affiliated 10 medical centers and pharmacy company . careplus provides medicare advantage hmo plans and benefits to medicare advantage members in miami-dade , broward and palm beach counties . this acquisition enhances our medicare market position in south florida . we paid approximately $ 444.9 million in cash , including transaction costs . we financed the transaction with $ 294.0 million of borrowings under our credit agreement and $ 150.9 million of cash on hand . the purchase price is subject to a balance sheet settlement process with a nine month claims run-out period . this settlement , which will be reflected as an adjustment to goodwill , is not expected to be material . the fair value of the acquired tangible assets ( assumed liabilities ) consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 92116</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>premiums receivable and other current assets</td><td>6510</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>property and equipment and other assets</td><td>21315</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>medical and other expenses payable</td><td>-37375 ( 37375 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-23359 ( 23359 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other liabilities</td><td>-5915 ( 5915 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net tangible assets acquired</td><td>$ 53292</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of medical and other expenses payable, in thousands?
| 37375.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the grant-date fair value of the award will be estimated using option-pricing models . in addition , certain tax effects of stock option exercises will be reported as a financing activity rather than an operating activity in the statements of cash flows . we adopted sfas 123r on january 1 , 2006 under the retrospective transition method using the black-scholes pricing model . the effect of expensing stock options under a fair value approach using the black-scholes pricing model on diluted earnings per common share for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 is disclosed on page 69 . in addition , the classification of cash inflows from any excess tax benefit associated with exercising stock options will change from an operating activity to a financing activity in the consolidated statements of cash flows with no impact on total cash flows . we estimate the impact of this change in classification will decrease operating cash flows ( and increase financing cash flows ) by approximately $ 15.5 million in 2005 , $ 3.7 million in 2004 , and $ 15.2 million in 2003 . stock option expense after adopting sfas 123r is not expected to be materially different than our pro forma disclosure on page 69 and is dependent on levels of stock options granted during 2006 . 3 . acquisitions in january 2006 , our commercial segment reached an agreement to acquire cha service company , or cha health , a health plan serving employer groups in kentucky , for cash consideration of approximately $ 60.0 million plus any excess statutory surplus . this transaction , which is subject to regulatory approval , is expected to close effective in the second quarter of 2006 . on december 20 , 2005 , our commercial segment acquired corphealth , inc. , or corphealth , a behavioral health care management company , for cash consideration of approximately $ 54.2 million , including transaction costs . this acquisition allows humana to integrate coverage of medical and behavior health benefits . net tangible assets acquired of $ 6.0 million primarily consisted of cash and cash equivalents . the purchase price exceeded the estimated fair value of the net tangible assets acquired by approximately $ 48.2 million . we preliminarily allocated this excess purchase price to other intangible assets of $ 8.6 million and associated deferred tax liabilities of $ 3.2 million , and non-deductible goodwill of $ 42.8 million . the other intangible assets , which consist primarily of customer contracts , have a weighted average useful life of 14.7 years . the allocation is subject to change pending completion of the valuation by a third party valuation specialist firm assisting us in evaluating the fair value of the assets acquired . on february 16 , 2005 , our government segment acquired careplus health plans of florida , or careplus , as well as its affiliated 10 medical centers and pharmacy company . careplus provides medicare advantage hmo plans and benefits to medicare advantage members in miami-dade , broward and palm beach counties . this acquisition enhances our medicare market position in south florida . we paid approximately $ 444.9 million in cash , including transaction costs . we financed the transaction with $ 294.0 million of borrowings under our credit agreement and $ 150.9 million of cash on hand . the purchase price is subject to a balance sheet settlement process with a nine month claims run-out period . this settlement , which will be reflected as an adjustment to goodwill , is not expected to be material . the fair value of the acquired tangible assets ( assumed liabilities ) consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 92116</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>premiums receivable and other current assets</td><td>6510</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>property and equipment and other assets</td><td>21315</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>medical and other expenses payable</td><td>-37375 ( 37375 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-23359 ( 23359 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other liabilities</td><td>-5915 ( 5915 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net tangible assets acquired</td><td>$ 53292</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of medical and other expenses payable, in thousands?
Answer: 37375.0
Question: and what was the value of other current liabilities, also in thousands?
| 23359.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the grant-date fair value of the award will be estimated using option-pricing models . in addition , certain tax effects of stock option exercises will be reported as a financing activity rather than an operating activity in the statements of cash flows . we adopted sfas 123r on january 1 , 2006 under the retrospective transition method using the black-scholes pricing model . the effect of expensing stock options under a fair value approach using the black-scholes pricing model on diluted earnings per common share for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 is disclosed on page 69 . in addition , the classification of cash inflows from any excess tax benefit associated with exercising stock options will change from an operating activity to a financing activity in the consolidated statements of cash flows with no impact on total cash flows . we estimate the impact of this change in classification will decrease operating cash flows ( and increase financing cash flows ) by approximately $ 15.5 million in 2005 , $ 3.7 million in 2004 , and $ 15.2 million in 2003 . stock option expense after adopting sfas 123r is not expected to be materially different than our pro forma disclosure on page 69 and is dependent on levels of stock options granted during 2006 . 3 . acquisitions in january 2006 , our commercial segment reached an agreement to acquire cha service company , or cha health , a health plan serving employer groups in kentucky , for cash consideration of approximately $ 60.0 million plus any excess statutory surplus . this transaction , which is subject to regulatory approval , is expected to close effective in the second quarter of 2006 . on december 20 , 2005 , our commercial segment acquired corphealth , inc. , or corphealth , a behavioral health care management company , for cash consideration of approximately $ 54.2 million , including transaction costs . this acquisition allows humana to integrate coverage of medical and behavior health benefits . net tangible assets acquired of $ 6.0 million primarily consisted of cash and cash equivalents . the purchase price exceeded the estimated fair value of the net tangible assets acquired by approximately $ 48.2 million . we preliminarily allocated this excess purchase price to other intangible assets of $ 8.6 million and associated deferred tax liabilities of $ 3.2 million , and non-deductible goodwill of $ 42.8 million . the other intangible assets , which consist primarily of customer contracts , have a weighted average useful life of 14.7 years . the allocation is subject to change pending completion of the valuation by a third party valuation specialist firm assisting us in evaluating the fair value of the assets acquired . on february 16 , 2005 , our government segment acquired careplus health plans of florida , or careplus , as well as its affiliated 10 medical centers and pharmacy company . careplus provides medicare advantage hmo plans and benefits to medicare advantage members in miami-dade , broward and palm beach counties . this acquisition enhances our medicare market position in south florida . we paid approximately $ 444.9 million in cash , including transaction costs . we financed the transaction with $ 294.0 million of borrowings under our credit agreement and $ 150.9 million of cash on hand . the purchase price is subject to a balance sheet settlement process with a nine month claims run-out period . this settlement , which will be reflected as an adjustment to goodwill , is not expected to be material . the fair value of the acquired tangible assets ( assumed liabilities ) consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 92116</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>premiums receivable and other current assets</td><td>6510</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>property and equipment and other assets</td><td>21315</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>medical and other expenses payable</td><td>-37375 ( 37375 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-23359 ( 23359 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other liabilities</td><td>-5915 ( 5915 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net tangible assets acquired</td><td>$ 53292</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of medical and other expenses payable, in thousands?
Answer: 37375.0
Question: and what was the value of other current liabilities, also in thousands?
Answer: 23359.0
Question: what would, then, be the total sum of those two values?
| 60734.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the grant-date fair value of the award will be estimated using option-pricing models . in addition , certain tax effects of stock option exercises will be reported as a financing activity rather than an operating activity in the statements of cash flows . we adopted sfas 123r on january 1 , 2006 under the retrospective transition method using the black-scholes pricing model . the effect of expensing stock options under a fair value approach using the black-scholes pricing model on diluted earnings per common share for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 is disclosed on page 69 . in addition , the classification of cash inflows from any excess tax benefit associated with exercising stock options will change from an operating activity to a financing activity in the consolidated statements of cash flows with no impact on total cash flows . we estimate the impact of this change in classification will decrease operating cash flows ( and increase financing cash flows ) by approximately $ 15.5 million in 2005 , $ 3.7 million in 2004 , and $ 15.2 million in 2003 . stock option expense after adopting sfas 123r is not expected to be materially different than our pro forma disclosure on page 69 and is dependent on levels of stock options granted during 2006 . 3 . acquisitions in january 2006 , our commercial segment reached an agreement to acquire cha service company , or cha health , a health plan serving employer groups in kentucky , for cash consideration of approximately $ 60.0 million plus any excess statutory surplus . this transaction , which is subject to regulatory approval , is expected to close effective in the second quarter of 2006 . on december 20 , 2005 , our commercial segment acquired corphealth , inc. , or corphealth , a behavioral health care management company , for cash consideration of approximately $ 54.2 million , including transaction costs . this acquisition allows humana to integrate coverage of medical and behavior health benefits . net tangible assets acquired of $ 6.0 million primarily consisted of cash and cash equivalents . the purchase price exceeded the estimated fair value of the net tangible assets acquired by approximately $ 48.2 million . we preliminarily allocated this excess purchase price to other intangible assets of $ 8.6 million and associated deferred tax liabilities of $ 3.2 million , and non-deductible goodwill of $ 42.8 million . the other intangible assets , which consist primarily of customer contracts , have a weighted average useful life of 14.7 years . the allocation is subject to change pending completion of the valuation by a third party valuation specialist firm assisting us in evaluating the fair value of the assets acquired . on february 16 , 2005 , our government segment acquired careplus health plans of florida , or careplus , as well as its affiliated 10 medical centers and pharmacy company . careplus provides medicare advantage hmo plans and benefits to medicare advantage members in miami-dade , broward and palm beach counties . this acquisition enhances our medicare market position in south florida . we paid approximately $ 444.9 million in cash , including transaction costs . we financed the transaction with $ 294.0 million of borrowings under our credit agreement and $ 150.9 million of cash on hand . the purchase price is subject to a balance sheet settlement process with a nine month claims run-out period . this settlement , which will be reflected as an adjustment to goodwill , is not expected to be material . the fair value of the acquired tangible assets ( assumed liabilities ) consisted of the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents</td><td>$ 92116</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>premiums receivable and other current assets</td><td>6510</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>property and equipment and other assets</td><td>21315</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>medical and other expenses payable</td><td>-37375 ( 37375 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other current liabilities</td><td>-23359 ( 23359 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other liabilities</td><td>-5915 ( 5915 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net tangible assets acquired</td><td>$ 53292</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of medical and other expenses payable, in thousands?
Answer: 37375.0
Question: and what was the value of other current liabilities, also in thousands?
Answer: 23359.0
Question: what would, then, be the total sum of those two values?
Answer: 60734.0
Question: including now the value of other liabilities, what would then be the total sum, in thousands?
| 66649.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2012 ( in mmboe ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.s .</td><td>canada</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2011</td><td>403</td><td>379</td><td>782</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>extensions and discoveries</td><td>134</td><td>68</td><td>202</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revisions due to prices</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td><td>9</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revisions other than price</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>conversion to proved developed reserves</td><td>-73 ( 73 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>-90 ( 90 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2012</td><td>407</td><td>433</td><td>840</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2012 , devon had 840 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves . this represents a 7 percent increase as compared to 2011 and represents 28 percent of its total proved reserves . drilling and development activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 203 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 90 mmboe , or 12 percent , of the 2011 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves . costs incurred related to the development and conversion of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves were $ 1.3 billion for 2012 . additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 16 mmboe primarily due to its evaluation of certain u.s . onshore dry-gas areas , which it does not expect to develop in the next five years . the largest revisions relate to the dry-gas areas at carthage in east texas and the barnett shale in north texas . a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2012 largely related to its jackfish operations . at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 429 mmboe and 367 mmboe , respectively . development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35000 barrel daily facility capacity . processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity , steam-oil ratios and air quality discharge permits . as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years . currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends though the year 2031 . price revisions 2012 - reserves decreased 171 mmboe primarily due to lower gas prices . of this decrease , 100 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 25 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2011 - reserves decreased 21 mmboe due to lower gas prices and higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . 2010 - reserves increased 72 mmboe due to higher gas prices , partially offset by the effect of higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . of the 72 mmboe price revisions , 43 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 22 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . revisions other than price total revisions other than price for 2012 and 2011 primarily related to devon 2019s evaluation of certain dry gas regions noted in the proved undeveloped reserves discussion above . total revisions other than price for 2010 primarily related to devon 2019s drilling and development in the barnett shale. .
Question: what were proved undeveloped reserved in canada for 2011?
| 379.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2012 ( in mmboe ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.s .</td><td>canada</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2011</td><td>403</td><td>379</td><td>782</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>extensions and discoveries</td><td>134</td><td>68</td><td>202</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revisions due to prices</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td><td>9</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revisions other than price</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>conversion to proved developed reserves</td><td>-73 ( 73 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>-90 ( 90 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2012</td><td>407</td><td>433</td><td>840</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2012 , devon had 840 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves . this represents a 7 percent increase as compared to 2011 and represents 28 percent of its total proved reserves . drilling and development activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 203 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 90 mmboe , or 12 percent , of the 2011 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves . costs incurred related to the development and conversion of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves were $ 1.3 billion for 2012 . additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 16 mmboe primarily due to its evaluation of certain u.s . onshore dry-gas areas , which it does not expect to develop in the next five years . the largest revisions relate to the dry-gas areas at carthage in east texas and the barnett shale in north texas . a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2012 largely related to its jackfish operations . at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 429 mmboe and 367 mmboe , respectively . development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35000 barrel daily facility capacity . processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity , steam-oil ratios and air quality discharge permits . as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years . currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends though the year 2031 . price revisions 2012 - reserves decreased 171 mmboe primarily due to lower gas prices . of this decrease , 100 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 25 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2011 - reserves decreased 21 mmboe due to lower gas prices and higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . 2010 - reserves increased 72 mmboe due to higher gas prices , partially offset by the effect of higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . of the 72 mmboe price revisions , 43 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 22 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . revisions other than price total revisions other than price for 2012 and 2011 primarily related to devon 2019s evaluation of certain dry gas regions noted in the proved undeveloped reserves discussion above . total revisions other than price for 2010 primarily related to devon 2019s drilling and development in the barnett shale. .
Question: what were proved undeveloped reserved in canada for 2011?
Answer: 379.0
Question: what were they in 2012?
| 433.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2012 ( in mmboe ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.s .</td><td>canada</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2011</td><td>403</td><td>379</td><td>782</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>extensions and discoveries</td><td>134</td><td>68</td><td>202</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revisions due to prices</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td><td>9</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revisions other than price</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>conversion to proved developed reserves</td><td>-73 ( 73 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>-90 ( 90 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2012</td><td>407</td><td>433</td><td>840</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2012 , devon had 840 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves . this represents a 7 percent increase as compared to 2011 and represents 28 percent of its total proved reserves . drilling and development activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 203 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 90 mmboe , or 12 percent , of the 2011 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves . costs incurred related to the development and conversion of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves were $ 1.3 billion for 2012 . additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 16 mmboe primarily due to its evaluation of certain u.s . onshore dry-gas areas , which it does not expect to develop in the next five years . the largest revisions relate to the dry-gas areas at carthage in east texas and the barnett shale in north texas . a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2012 largely related to its jackfish operations . at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 429 mmboe and 367 mmboe , respectively . development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35000 barrel daily facility capacity . processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity , steam-oil ratios and air quality discharge permits . as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years . currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends though the year 2031 . price revisions 2012 - reserves decreased 171 mmboe primarily due to lower gas prices . of this decrease , 100 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 25 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2011 - reserves decreased 21 mmboe due to lower gas prices and higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . 2010 - reserves increased 72 mmboe due to higher gas prices , partially offset by the effect of higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . of the 72 mmboe price revisions , 43 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 22 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . revisions other than price total revisions other than price for 2012 and 2011 primarily related to devon 2019s evaluation of certain dry gas regions noted in the proved undeveloped reserves discussion above . total revisions other than price for 2010 primarily related to devon 2019s drilling and development in the barnett shale. .
Question: what were proved undeveloped reserved in canada for 2011?
Answer: 379.0
Question: what were they in 2012?
Answer: 433.0
Question: what is the sum?
| 812.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2012 ( in mmboe ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.s .</td><td>canada</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2011</td><td>403</td><td>379</td><td>782</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>extensions and discoveries</td><td>134</td><td>68</td><td>202</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revisions due to prices</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td><td>9</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revisions other than price</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>conversion to proved developed reserves</td><td>-73 ( 73 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>-90 ( 90 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2012</td><td>407</td><td>433</td><td>840</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2012 , devon had 840 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves . this represents a 7 percent increase as compared to 2011 and represents 28 percent of its total proved reserves . drilling and development activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 203 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 90 mmboe , or 12 percent , of the 2011 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves . costs incurred related to the development and conversion of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves were $ 1.3 billion for 2012 . additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 16 mmboe primarily due to its evaluation of certain u.s . onshore dry-gas areas , which it does not expect to develop in the next five years . the largest revisions relate to the dry-gas areas at carthage in east texas and the barnett shale in north texas . a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2012 largely related to its jackfish operations . at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 429 mmboe and 367 mmboe , respectively . development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35000 barrel daily facility capacity . processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity , steam-oil ratios and air quality discharge permits . as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years . currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends though the year 2031 . price revisions 2012 - reserves decreased 171 mmboe primarily due to lower gas prices . of this decrease , 100 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 25 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2011 - reserves decreased 21 mmboe due to lower gas prices and higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . 2010 - reserves increased 72 mmboe due to higher gas prices , partially offset by the effect of higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . of the 72 mmboe price revisions , 43 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 22 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . revisions other than price total revisions other than price for 2012 and 2011 primarily related to devon 2019s evaluation of certain dry gas regions noted in the proved undeveloped reserves discussion above . total revisions other than price for 2010 primarily related to devon 2019s drilling and development in the barnett shale. .
Question: what were proved undeveloped reserved in canada for 2011?
Answer: 379.0
Question: what were they in 2012?
Answer: 433.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 812.0
Question: what was the canadian value in 2011?
| 379.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2012 ( in mmboe ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.s .</td><td>canada</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2011</td><td>403</td><td>379</td><td>782</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>extensions and discoveries</td><td>134</td><td>68</td><td>202</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revisions due to prices</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td><td>9</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revisions other than price</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>conversion to proved developed reserves</td><td>-73 ( 73 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>-90 ( 90 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2012</td><td>407</td><td>433</td><td>840</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2012 , devon had 840 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves . this represents a 7 percent increase as compared to 2011 and represents 28 percent of its total proved reserves . drilling and development activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 203 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 90 mmboe , or 12 percent , of the 2011 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves . costs incurred related to the development and conversion of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves were $ 1.3 billion for 2012 . additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 16 mmboe primarily due to its evaluation of certain u.s . onshore dry-gas areas , which it does not expect to develop in the next five years . the largest revisions relate to the dry-gas areas at carthage in east texas and the barnett shale in north texas . a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2012 largely related to its jackfish operations . at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 429 mmboe and 367 mmboe , respectively . development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35000 barrel daily facility capacity . processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity , steam-oil ratios and air quality discharge permits . as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years . currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends though the year 2031 . price revisions 2012 - reserves decreased 171 mmboe primarily due to lower gas prices . of this decrease , 100 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 25 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2011 - reserves decreased 21 mmboe due to lower gas prices and higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . 2010 - reserves increased 72 mmboe due to higher gas prices , partially offset by the effect of higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . of the 72 mmboe price revisions , 43 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 22 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . revisions other than price total revisions other than price for 2012 and 2011 primarily related to devon 2019s evaluation of certain dry gas regions noted in the proved undeveloped reserves discussion above . total revisions other than price for 2010 primarily related to devon 2019s drilling and development in the barnett shale. .
Question: what were proved undeveloped reserved in canada for 2011?
Answer: 379.0
Question: what were they in 2012?
Answer: 433.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 812.0
Question: what was the canadian value in 2011?
Answer: 379.0
Question: what is that value over the sum value?
| 0.46675 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) proved undeveloped reserves the following table presents the changes in devon 2019s total proved undeveloped reserves during 2012 ( in mmboe ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.s .</td><td>canada</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2011</td><td>403</td><td>379</td><td>782</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>extensions and discoveries</td><td>134</td><td>68</td><td>202</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>revisions due to prices</td><td>-47 ( 47 )</td><td>9</td><td>-38 ( 38 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>revisions other than price</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-16 ( 16 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>conversion to proved developed reserves</td><td>-73 ( 73 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>-90 ( 90 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 2012</td><td>407</td><td>433</td><td>840</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2012 , devon had 840 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves . this represents a 7 percent increase as compared to 2011 and represents 28 percent of its total proved reserves . drilling and development activities increased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 203 mmboe and resulted in the conversion of 90 mmboe , or 12 percent , of the 2011 proved undeveloped reserves to proved developed reserves . costs incurred related to the development and conversion of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves were $ 1.3 billion for 2012 . additionally , revisions other than price decreased devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves 16 mmboe primarily due to its evaluation of certain u.s . onshore dry-gas areas , which it does not expect to develop in the next five years . the largest revisions relate to the dry-gas areas at carthage in east texas and the barnett shale in north texas . a significant amount of devon 2019s proved undeveloped reserves at the end of 2012 largely related to its jackfish operations . at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , devon 2019s jackfish proved undeveloped reserves were 429 mmboe and 367 mmboe , respectively . development schedules for the jackfish reserves are primarily controlled by the need to keep the processing plants at their 35000 barrel daily facility capacity . processing plant capacity is controlled by factors such as total steam processing capacity , steam-oil ratios and air quality discharge permits . as a result , these reserves are classified as proved undeveloped for more than five years . currently , the development schedule for these reserves extends though the year 2031 . price revisions 2012 - reserves decreased 171 mmboe primarily due to lower gas prices . of this decrease , 100 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 25 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . 2011 - reserves decreased 21 mmboe due to lower gas prices and higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . 2010 - reserves increased 72 mmboe due to higher gas prices , partially offset by the effect of higher oil prices . the higher oil prices increased devon 2019s canadian royalty burden , which reduced devon 2019s oil reserves . of the 72 mmboe price revisions , 43 mmboe related to the barnett shale and 22 mmboe related to the rocky mountain area . revisions other than price total revisions other than price for 2012 and 2011 primarily related to devon 2019s evaluation of certain dry gas regions noted in the proved undeveloped reserves discussion above . total revisions other than price for 2010 primarily related to devon 2019s drilling and development in the barnett shale. .
Question: what were proved undeveloped reserved in canada for 2011?
Answer: 379.0
Question: what were they in 2012?
Answer: 433.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 812.0
Question: what was the canadian value in 2011?
Answer: 379.0
Question: what is that value over the sum value?
Answer: 0.46675
Question: what is that times 100?
| 46.67488 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
13 . pension and other postretirement benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees in the united states and in certain of its international subsidiaries . as a result of plan design changes approved in 2011 , beginning on january 1 , 2013 , active participants in merck 2019s primary u.s . defined benefit pension plans are accruing pension benefits using new cash balance formulas based on age , service , pay and interest . however , during a transition period from january 1 , 2013 through december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn the greater of the benefit as calculated under the employee 2019s legacy final average pay formula or their new cash balance formula . for all years of service after december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn future benefits under only the cash balance formula . in addition , the company provides medical benefits , principally to its eligible u.s . retirees and their dependents , through its other postretirement benefit plans . the company uses december 31 as the year-end measurement date for all of its pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans . net periodic benefit cost the net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans consisted of the following components: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31</td><td>pension benefits 2013</td><td>pension benefits 2012</td><td>pension benefits 2011</td><td>pension benefits 2013</td><td>pension benefits 2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 682</td><td>$ 555</td><td>$ 619</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 110</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>665</td><td>661</td><td>718</td><td>107</td><td>121</td><td>141</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-1097 ( 1097 )</td><td>-970 ( 970 )</td><td>-972 ( 972 )</td><td>-126 ( 126 )</td><td>-136 ( 136 )</td><td>-142 ( 142 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net amortization</td><td>336</td><td>185</td><td>201</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>termination benefits</td><td>58</td><td>27</td><td>59</td><td>50</td><td>18</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>curtailments</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-86 ( 86 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>23</td><td>18</td><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net periodic benefit cost</td><td>$ 644</td><td>$ 466</td><td>$ 543</td><td>$ 72</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 122</td></tr></table> the increase in net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans in 2013 as compared with 2012 is largely attributable to a change in the discount rate . the net periodic benefit cost attributable to u.s . pension plans included in the above table was $ 348 million in 2013 , $ 268 million in 2012 and $ 406 million in in connection with restructuring actions ( see note 3 ) , termination charges were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans related to expanded eligibility for certain employees exiting merck . also , in connection with these restructuring activities , curtailments were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans . in addition , settlements were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on certain domestic and international pension plans . table of contents .
Question: what was the change in the net amortization from 2012 to 2013?
| 151.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
13 . pension and other postretirement benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees in the united states and in certain of its international subsidiaries . as a result of plan design changes approved in 2011 , beginning on january 1 , 2013 , active participants in merck 2019s primary u.s . defined benefit pension plans are accruing pension benefits using new cash balance formulas based on age , service , pay and interest . however , during a transition period from january 1 , 2013 through december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn the greater of the benefit as calculated under the employee 2019s legacy final average pay formula or their new cash balance formula . for all years of service after december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn future benefits under only the cash balance formula . in addition , the company provides medical benefits , principally to its eligible u.s . retirees and their dependents , through its other postretirement benefit plans . the company uses december 31 as the year-end measurement date for all of its pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans . net periodic benefit cost the net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans consisted of the following components: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31</td><td>pension benefits 2013</td><td>pension benefits 2012</td><td>pension benefits 2011</td><td>pension benefits 2013</td><td>pension benefits 2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 682</td><td>$ 555</td><td>$ 619</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 110</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>665</td><td>661</td><td>718</td><td>107</td><td>121</td><td>141</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-1097 ( 1097 )</td><td>-970 ( 970 )</td><td>-972 ( 972 )</td><td>-126 ( 126 )</td><td>-136 ( 136 )</td><td>-142 ( 142 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net amortization</td><td>336</td><td>185</td><td>201</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>termination benefits</td><td>58</td><td>27</td><td>59</td><td>50</td><td>18</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>curtailments</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-86 ( 86 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>23</td><td>18</td><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net periodic benefit cost</td><td>$ 644</td><td>$ 466</td><td>$ 543</td><td>$ 72</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 122</td></tr></table> the increase in net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans in 2013 as compared with 2012 is largely attributable to a change in the discount rate . the net periodic benefit cost attributable to u.s . pension plans included in the above table was $ 348 million in 2013 , $ 268 million in 2012 and $ 406 million in in connection with restructuring actions ( see note 3 ) , termination charges were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans related to expanded eligibility for certain employees exiting merck . also , in connection with these restructuring activities , curtailments were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans . in addition , settlements were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on certain domestic and international pension plans . table of contents .
Question: what was the change in the net amortization from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 151.0
Question: and what was that net amortization in 2012?
| 185.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
13 . pension and other postretirement benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees in the united states and in certain of its international subsidiaries . as a result of plan design changes approved in 2011 , beginning on january 1 , 2013 , active participants in merck 2019s primary u.s . defined benefit pension plans are accruing pension benefits using new cash balance formulas based on age , service , pay and interest . however , during a transition period from january 1 , 2013 through december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn the greater of the benefit as calculated under the employee 2019s legacy final average pay formula or their new cash balance formula . for all years of service after december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn future benefits under only the cash balance formula . in addition , the company provides medical benefits , principally to its eligible u.s . retirees and their dependents , through its other postretirement benefit plans . the company uses december 31 as the year-end measurement date for all of its pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans . net periodic benefit cost the net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans consisted of the following components: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31</td><td>pension benefits 2013</td><td>pension benefits 2012</td><td>pension benefits 2011</td><td>pension benefits 2013</td><td>pension benefits 2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 682</td><td>$ 555</td><td>$ 619</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 110</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>665</td><td>661</td><td>718</td><td>107</td><td>121</td><td>141</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-1097 ( 1097 )</td><td>-970 ( 970 )</td><td>-972 ( 972 )</td><td>-126 ( 126 )</td><td>-136 ( 136 )</td><td>-142 ( 142 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net amortization</td><td>336</td><td>185</td><td>201</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>termination benefits</td><td>58</td><td>27</td><td>59</td><td>50</td><td>18</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>curtailments</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-86 ( 86 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>23</td><td>18</td><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net periodic benefit cost</td><td>$ 644</td><td>$ 466</td><td>$ 543</td><td>$ 72</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 122</td></tr></table> the increase in net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans in 2013 as compared with 2012 is largely attributable to a change in the discount rate . the net periodic benefit cost attributable to u.s . pension plans included in the above table was $ 348 million in 2013 , $ 268 million in 2012 and $ 406 million in in connection with restructuring actions ( see note 3 ) , termination charges were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans related to expanded eligibility for certain employees exiting merck . also , in connection with these restructuring activities , curtailments were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans . in addition , settlements were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on certain domestic and international pension plans . table of contents .
Question: what was the change in the net amortization from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 151.0
Question: and what was that net amortization in 2012?
Answer: 185.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2012 net amortization, in percentage?
| 0.81622 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
interest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.2 million , $ 0.8 million , and $ 0.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 6 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2016 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2016 as well as significant operating lease agreements entered into during the period after december 31 , 2016 through the date of this report : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 114857</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>127504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>136040</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>133092</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>122753</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 and thereafter</td><td>788180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 1422426</td></tr></table> included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements . included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . sports marketing and other commitments within the normal course of business , the company enters into contractual commitments in order to promote the company 2019s brand and products . these commitments include sponsorship agreements with teams and athletes on the collegiate and professional levels , official supplier agreements , athletic event sponsorships and other marketing commitments . the following is a schedule of the company 2019s future minimum payments under its sponsorship and other marketing agreements as of december 31 .
Question: what was the rent expense in 2016?
| 109.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
interest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.2 million , $ 0.8 million , and $ 0.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 6 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2016 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2016 as well as significant operating lease agreements entered into during the period after december 31 , 2016 through the date of this report : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 114857</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>127504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>136040</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>133092</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>122753</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 and thereafter</td><td>788180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 1422426</td></tr></table> included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements . included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . sports marketing and other commitments within the normal course of business , the company enters into contractual commitments in order to promote the company 2019s brand and products . these commitments include sponsorship agreements with teams and athletes on the collegiate and professional levels , official supplier agreements , athletic event sponsorships and other marketing commitments . the following is a schedule of the company 2019s future minimum payments under its sponsorship and other marketing agreements as of december 31 .
Question: what was the rent expense in 2016?
Answer: 109.0
Question: and what was it in 2015?
| 83.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
interest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.2 million , $ 0.8 million , and $ 0.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 6 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2016 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2016 as well as significant operating lease agreements entered into during the period after december 31 , 2016 through the date of this report : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 114857</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>127504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>136040</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>133092</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>122753</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 and thereafter</td><td>788180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 1422426</td></tr></table> included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements . included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . sports marketing and other commitments within the normal course of business , the company enters into contractual commitments in order to promote the company 2019s brand and products . these commitments include sponsorship agreements with teams and athletes on the collegiate and professional levels , official supplier agreements , athletic event sponsorships and other marketing commitments . the following is a schedule of the company 2019s future minimum payments under its sponsorship and other marketing agreements as of december 31 .
Question: what was the rent expense in 2016?
Answer: 109.0
Question: and what was it in 2015?
Answer: 83.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 26.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
interest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.2 million , $ 0.8 million , and $ 0.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 6 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2016 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2016 as well as significant operating lease agreements entered into during the period after december 31 , 2016 through the date of this report : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 114857</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>127504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>136040</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>133092</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>122753</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 and thereafter</td><td>788180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 1422426</td></tr></table> included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements . included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . sports marketing and other commitments within the normal course of business , the company enters into contractual commitments in order to promote the company 2019s brand and products . these commitments include sponsorship agreements with teams and athletes on the collegiate and professional levels , official supplier agreements , athletic event sponsorships and other marketing commitments . the following is a schedule of the company 2019s future minimum payments under its sponsorship and other marketing agreements as of december 31 .
Question: what was the rent expense in 2016?
Answer: 109.0
Question: and what was it in 2015?
Answer: 83.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 26.0
Question: what was the rent expense in 2015?
| 83.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
interest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.2 million , $ 0.8 million , and $ 0.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 6 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2016 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2016 as well as significant operating lease agreements entered into during the period after december 31 , 2016 through the date of this report : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 114857</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>127504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>136040</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>133092</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>122753</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 and thereafter</td><td>788180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 1422426</td></tr></table> included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements . included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . sports marketing and other commitments within the normal course of business , the company enters into contractual commitments in order to promote the company 2019s brand and products . these commitments include sponsorship agreements with teams and athletes on the collegiate and professional levels , official supplier agreements , athletic event sponsorships and other marketing commitments . the following is a schedule of the company 2019s future minimum payments under its sponsorship and other marketing agreements as of december 31 .
Question: what was the rent expense in 2016?
Answer: 109.0
Question: and what was it in 2015?
Answer: 83.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 26.0
Question: what was the rent expense in 2015?
Answer: 83.0
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2015 amount, in percentage?
| 0.31325 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
2011 compared to 2010 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2011 decreased $ 540 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2010 . the decrease primarily was attributable to lower volume of approximately $ 665 million due to the absence of the dris program that supported the 2010 u.s . census and a decline in activities on the jtrs program . this decrease partially was offset by increased net sales on numerous programs . is&gs 2019 operating profit for 2011 increased $ 60 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , compared to 2010 . operating profit increased approximately $ 180 million due to volume and the retirement of risks in 2011 and the absence of reserves recognized in 2010 on numerous programs ( including among others , odin ( about $ 60 million ) and twic and automated flight service station programs ) . the increases in operating profit partially were offset by the absence of the dris program and a decline in activities on the jtrs program of about $ 120 million . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 130 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to the substantial completion of various programs in 2011 ( primarily odin , u.k . census , and jtrs ) . the decrease in backlog during 2011 compared to 2010 mainly was due to declining activities on the jtrs program and several other smaller programs . trends we expect is&gs 2019 net sales to decline in 2013 in the mid single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 primarily due to the continued downturn in federal information technology budgets . operating profit is expected to decline in 2013 in the mid single digit percentage range consistent with the expected decline in net sales , resulting in margins that are comparable with 2012 results . missiles and fire control our mfc business segment provides air and missile defense systems ; tactical missiles and air-to-ground precision strike weapon systems ; fire control systems ; mission operations support , readiness , engineering support , and integration services ; logistics and other technical services ; and manned and unmanned ground vehicles . mfc 2019s major programs include pac-3 , thaad , multiple launch rocket system ( mlrs ) , hellfire , javelin , joint air-to-surface standoff missile ( jassm ) , apache fire control system ( apache ) , sniper ae , low altitude navigation and targeting infrared for night ( lantirn ae ) , and sof clss . mfc 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7457</td><td>$ 7463</td><td>$ 6930</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1256</td><td>1069</td><td>973</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>16.8% ( 16.8 % )</td><td>14.3% ( 14.3 % )</td><td>14.0% ( 14.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>14700</td><td>14400</td><td>12800</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 mfc 2019s net sales for 2012 were comparable to 2011 . net sales decreased approximately $ 130 million due to lower volume and risk retirements on various services programs , and about $ 60 million due to lower volume from fire control systems programs ( primarily sniper ae ; lantirn ae ; and apache ) . the decreases largely were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 95 million due to higher volume from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) and approximately $ 80 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 187 million , or 17% ( 17 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher risk retirements and volume of about $ 95 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) ; increased risk retirements and volume of approximately $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about $ 45 million from a resolution of contractual matters . partially offsetting these increases was lower risk retirements and volume on various programs , including $ 25 million for services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 145 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. .
Question: what is the change in operating profit from 2010 to 2011?
| 96.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
2011 compared to 2010 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2011 decreased $ 540 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2010 . the decrease primarily was attributable to lower volume of approximately $ 665 million due to the absence of the dris program that supported the 2010 u.s . census and a decline in activities on the jtrs program . this decrease partially was offset by increased net sales on numerous programs . is&gs 2019 operating profit for 2011 increased $ 60 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , compared to 2010 . operating profit increased approximately $ 180 million due to volume and the retirement of risks in 2011 and the absence of reserves recognized in 2010 on numerous programs ( including among others , odin ( about $ 60 million ) and twic and automated flight service station programs ) . the increases in operating profit partially were offset by the absence of the dris program and a decline in activities on the jtrs program of about $ 120 million . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 130 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to the substantial completion of various programs in 2011 ( primarily odin , u.k . census , and jtrs ) . the decrease in backlog during 2011 compared to 2010 mainly was due to declining activities on the jtrs program and several other smaller programs . trends we expect is&gs 2019 net sales to decline in 2013 in the mid single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 primarily due to the continued downturn in federal information technology budgets . operating profit is expected to decline in 2013 in the mid single digit percentage range consistent with the expected decline in net sales , resulting in margins that are comparable with 2012 results . missiles and fire control our mfc business segment provides air and missile defense systems ; tactical missiles and air-to-ground precision strike weapon systems ; fire control systems ; mission operations support , readiness , engineering support , and integration services ; logistics and other technical services ; and manned and unmanned ground vehicles . mfc 2019s major programs include pac-3 , thaad , multiple launch rocket system ( mlrs ) , hellfire , javelin , joint air-to-surface standoff missile ( jassm ) , apache fire control system ( apache ) , sniper ae , low altitude navigation and targeting infrared for night ( lantirn ae ) , and sof clss . mfc 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7457</td><td>$ 7463</td><td>$ 6930</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1256</td><td>1069</td><td>973</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>16.8% ( 16.8 % )</td><td>14.3% ( 14.3 % )</td><td>14.0% ( 14.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>14700</td><td>14400</td><td>12800</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 mfc 2019s net sales for 2012 were comparable to 2011 . net sales decreased approximately $ 130 million due to lower volume and risk retirements on various services programs , and about $ 60 million due to lower volume from fire control systems programs ( primarily sniper ae ; lantirn ae ; and apache ) . the decreases largely were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 95 million due to higher volume from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) and approximately $ 80 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 187 million , or 17% ( 17 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher risk retirements and volume of about $ 95 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) ; increased risk retirements and volume of approximately $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about $ 45 million from a resolution of contractual matters . partially offsetting these increases was lower risk retirements and volume on various programs , including $ 25 million for services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 145 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. .
Question: what is the change in operating profit from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 96.0
Question: what is the operating profit in 2010?
| 973.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
2011 compared to 2010 is&gs 2019 net sales for 2011 decreased $ 540 million , or 5% ( 5 % ) , compared to 2010 . the decrease primarily was attributable to lower volume of approximately $ 665 million due to the absence of the dris program that supported the 2010 u.s . census and a decline in activities on the jtrs program . this decrease partially was offset by increased net sales on numerous programs . is&gs 2019 operating profit for 2011 increased $ 60 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , compared to 2010 . operating profit increased approximately $ 180 million due to volume and the retirement of risks in 2011 and the absence of reserves recognized in 2010 on numerous programs ( including among others , odin ( about $ 60 million ) and twic and automated flight service station programs ) . the increases in operating profit partially were offset by the absence of the dris program and a decline in activities on the jtrs program of about $ 120 million . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit rate adjustments described above , were approximately $ 130 million higher in 2011 compared to 2010 . backlog backlog decreased in 2012 compared to 2011 primarily due to the substantial completion of various programs in 2011 ( primarily odin , u.k . census , and jtrs ) . the decrease in backlog during 2011 compared to 2010 mainly was due to declining activities on the jtrs program and several other smaller programs . trends we expect is&gs 2019 net sales to decline in 2013 in the mid single digit percentage range as compared to 2012 primarily due to the continued downturn in federal information technology budgets . operating profit is expected to decline in 2013 in the mid single digit percentage range consistent with the expected decline in net sales , resulting in margins that are comparable with 2012 results . missiles and fire control our mfc business segment provides air and missile defense systems ; tactical missiles and air-to-ground precision strike weapon systems ; fire control systems ; mission operations support , readiness , engineering support , and integration services ; logistics and other technical services ; and manned and unmanned ground vehicles . mfc 2019s major programs include pac-3 , thaad , multiple launch rocket system ( mlrs ) , hellfire , javelin , joint air-to-surface standoff missile ( jassm ) , apache fire control system ( apache ) , sniper ae , low altitude navigation and targeting infrared for night ( lantirn ae ) , and sof clss . mfc 2019s operating results included the following ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 7457</td><td>$ 7463</td><td>$ 6930</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1256</td><td>1069</td><td>973</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>operating margins</td><td>16.8% ( 16.8 % )</td><td>14.3% ( 14.3 % )</td><td>14.0% ( 14.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>backlog at year-end</td><td>14700</td><td>14400</td><td>12800</td></tr></table> 2012 compared to 2011 mfc 2019s net sales for 2012 were comparable to 2011 . net sales decreased approximately $ 130 million due to lower volume and risk retirements on various services programs , and about $ 60 million due to lower volume from fire control systems programs ( primarily sniper ae ; lantirn ae ; and apache ) . the decreases largely were offset by higher net sales of approximately $ 95 million due to higher volume from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) and approximately $ 80 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily pac-3 and thaad ) . mfc 2019s operating profit for 2012 increased $ 187 million , or 17% ( 17 % ) , compared to 2011 . the increase was attributable to higher risk retirements and volume of about $ 95 million from tactical missile programs ( primarily javelin and hellfire ) ; increased risk retirements and volume of approximately $ 60 million for air and missile defense programs ( primarily thaad and pac-3 ) ; and about $ 45 million from a resolution of contractual matters . partially offsetting these increases was lower risk retirements and volume on various programs , including $ 25 million for services programs . adjustments not related to volume , including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above , were approximately $ 145 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011. .
Question: what is the change in operating profit from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 96.0
Question: what is the operating profit in 2010?
Answer: 973.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.09866 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
entergy texas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 442.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-4.6 ( 4.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>-3.3 ( 3.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securitization transition charge</td><td>9.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-10.1 ( 10.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 440.9</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the unbilled sales period . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization revenue related to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007 . the securitization transition charge variance is primarily due to the issuance of securitization bonds . in june 2007 , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds . the fuel recovery variance is primarily due to a reserve for potential rate refunds made in the first quarter 2007 as a result of a puct ruling related to the application of past puct rulings addressing transition to competition in texas . the other variance is primarily caused by various operational effects of the jurisdictional separation on revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased $ 229.3 million primarily due to the following reasons : an increase of $ 157 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased usage , partially offset by interim fuel refunds to customers for fuel cost recovery over-collections through november 2007 . the refund was distributed over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the interim refund and the puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements ; an increase of $ 37.1 million in affiliated wholesale revenue primarily due to increases in the cost of energy ; an increase in transition charge amounts collected from customers to service the securitization bonds as discussed above . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds ; and implementation of an interim surcharge to collect $ 10.3 million in under-recovered incremental purchased capacity costs incurred through july 2007 . the surcharge was collected over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the incremental capacity recovery rider and puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements. .
Question: what was the net revenue in 2008?
| 440.9 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
entergy texas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 442.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-4.6 ( 4.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>-3.3 ( 3.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securitization transition charge</td><td>9.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-10.1 ( 10.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 440.9</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the unbilled sales period . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization revenue related to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007 . the securitization transition charge variance is primarily due to the issuance of securitization bonds . in june 2007 , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds . the fuel recovery variance is primarily due to a reserve for potential rate refunds made in the first quarter 2007 as a result of a puct ruling related to the application of past puct rulings addressing transition to competition in texas . the other variance is primarily caused by various operational effects of the jurisdictional separation on revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased $ 229.3 million primarily due to the following reasons : an increase of $ 157 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased usage , partially offset by interim fuel refunds to customers for fuel cost recovery over-collections through november 2007 . the refund was distributed over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the interim refund and the puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements ; an increase of $ 37.1 million in affiliated wholesale revenue primarily due to increases in the cost of energy ; an increase in transition charge amounts collected from customers to service the securitization bonds as discussed above . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds ; and implementation of an interim surcharge to collect $ 10.3 million in under-recovered incremental purchased capacity costs incurred through july 2007 . the surcharge was collected over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the incremental capacity recovery rider and puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements. .
Question: what was the net revenue in 2008?
Answer: 440.9
Question: and that in 2007?
| 442.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
entergy texas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 442.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-4.6 ( 4.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>-3.3 ( 3.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securitization transition charge</td><td>9.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-10.1 ( 10.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 440.9</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the unbilled sales period . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization revenue related to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007 . the securitization transition charge variance is primarily due to the issuance of securitization bonds . in june 2007 , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds . the fuel recovery variance is primarily due to a reserve for potential rate refunds made in the first quarter 2007 as a result of a puct ruling related to the application of past puct rulings addressing transition to competition in texas . the other variance is primarily caused by various operational effects of the jurisdictional separation on revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased $ 229.3 million primarily due to the following reasons : an increase of $ 157 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased usage , partially offset by interim fuel refunds to customers for fuel cost recovery over-collections through november 2007 . the refund was distributed over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the interim refund and the puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements ; an increase of $ 37.1 million in affiliated wholesale revenue primarily due to increases in the cost of energy ; an increase in transition charge amounts collected from customers to service the securitization bonds as discussed above . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds ; and implementation of an interim surcharge to collect $ 10.3 million in under-recovered incremental purchased capacity costs incurred through july 2007 . the surcharge was collected over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the incremental capacity recovery rider and puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements. .
Question: what was the net revenue in 2008?
Answer: 440.9
Question: and that in 2007?
Answer: 442.3
Question: so what was the change in value between these two years?
| -1.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
entergy texas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 442.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>-4.6 ( 4.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>-3.3 ( 3.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>securitization transition charge</td><td>9.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fuel recovery</td><td>7.5</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>-10.1 ( 10.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 440.9</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is primarily due to decreased usage during the unbilled sales period . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization revenue related to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007 . the securitization transition charge variance is primarily due to the issuance of securitization bonds . in june 2007 , entergy gulf states reconstruction funding i , a company wholly-owned and consolidated by entergy texas , issued securitization bonds and with the proceeds purchased from entergy texas the transition property , which is the right to recover from customers through a transition charge amounts sufficient to service the securitization bonds . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds . the fuel recovery variance is primarily due to a reserve for potential rate refunds made in the first quarter 2007 as a result of a puct ruling related to the application of past puct rulings addressing transition to competition in texas . the other variance is primarily caused by various operational effects of the jurisdictional separation on revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased $ 229.3 million primarily due to the following reasons : an increase of $ 157 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased usage , partially offset by interim fuel refunds to customers for fuel cost recovery over-collections through november 2007 . the refund was distributed over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the interim refund and the puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements ; an increase of $ 37.1 million in affiliated wholesale revenue primarily due to increases in the cost of energy ; an increase in transition charge amounts collected from customers to service the securitization bonds as discussed above . see note 5 to the financial statements for additional information regarding the securitization bonds ; and implementation of an interim surcharge to collect $ 10.3 million in under-recovered incremental purchased capacity costs incurred through july 2007 . the surcharge was collected over a two-month period beginning february 2008 . the incremental capacity recovery rider and puct approval is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements. .
Question: what was the net revenue in 2008?
Answer: 440.9
Question: and that in 2007?
Answer: 442.3
Question: so what was the change in value between these two years?
Answer: -1.4
Question: and the percentage change?
| -0.00317 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
concentration of credit risk credit risk represents the accounting loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counterparties failed to perform as contracted . the company believes the likelihood of incurring material losses due to concentration of credit risk is remote . the principal financial instruments subject to credit risk are as follows : cash and cash equivalents - the company maintains cash deposits with major banks , which from time to time may exceed insured limits . the possibility of loss related to financial condition of major banks has been deemed minimal . additionally , the company 2019s investment policy limits exposure to concentrations of credit risk and changes in market conditions . accounts receivable - a large number of customers in diverse industries and geographies , as well as the practice of establishing reasonable credit lines , limits credit risk . based on historical trends and experiences , the allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate to cover potential credit risk losses . foreign currency and interest rate contracts and derivatives - exposure to credit risk is limited by internal policies and active monitoring of counterparty risks . in addition , the company uses a diversified group of major international banks and financial institutions as counterparties . the company does not anticipate nonperformance by any of these counterparties . cash and cash equivalents cash equivalents include highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased . accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts accounts receivable are carried at their face amounts less an allowance for doubtful accounts . accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and generally do not bear interest . the company estimates the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts by analyzing accounts receivable balances by age and applying historical write-off and collection trend rates . the company 2019s estimates include separately providing for customer balances based on specific circumstances and credit conditions , and when it is deemed probable that the balance is uncollectible . account balances are charged off against the allowance when it is determined the receivable will not be recovered . the company 2019s allowance for doubtful accounts balance also includes an allowance for the expected return of products shipped and credits related to pricing or quantities shipped of $ 15 million as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 and $ 14 million as of december 31 , 2013 . returns and credit activity is recorded directly to sales . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 81</td><td>$ 73</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>bad debt expense</td><td>26</td><td>23</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( a )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 75</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 81</td></tr></table> ( a ) other amounts are primarily the effects of changes in currency translations and the impact of allowance for returns and credits . inventory valuations inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market . certain u.s . inventory costs are determined on a last-in , first-out ( lifo ) basis . lifo inventories represented 39% ( 39 % ) and 37% ( 37 % ) of consolidated inventories as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . lifo inventories include certain legacy nalco u.s . inventory acquired at fair value as part of the nalco merger . all other inventory costs are determined using either the average cost or first-in , first-out ( fifo ) methods . inventory values at fifo , as shown in note 5 , approximate replacement during the fourth quarter of 2015 , the company improved estimates related to its inventory reserves and product costing , resulting in a net pre-tax charge of approximately $ 6 million . separately , the actions resulted in charge of $ 20.6 million related to inventory reserve calculations , partially offset by a gain of $ 14.5 million related to the capitalization of certain cost components into inventory . both of these items are reflected in note 3. .
Question: what was the percent of lifo inventories as a percent of consolidated inventories as of december 31, 2015?
| 39.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
concentration of credit risk credit risk represents the accounting loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counterparties failed to perform as contracted . the company believes the likelihood of incurring material losses due to concentration of credit risk is remote . the principal financial instruments subject to credit risk are as follows : cash and cash equivalents - the company maintains cash deposits with major banks , which from time to time may exceed insured limits . the possibility of loss related to financial condition of major banks has been deemed minimal . additionally , the company 2019s investment policy limits exposure to concentrations of credit risk and changes in market conditions . accounts receivable - a large number of customers in diverse industries and geographies , as well as the practice of establishing reasonable credit lines , limits credit risk . based on historical trends and experiences , the allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate to cover potential credit risk losses . foreign currency and interest rate contracts and derivatives - exposure to credit risk is limited by internal policies and active monitoring of counterparty risks . in addition , the company uses a diversified group of major international banks and financial institutions as counterparties . the company does not anticipate nonperformance by any of these counterparties . cash and cash equivalents cash equivalents include highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased . accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts accounts receivable are carried at their face amounts less an allowance for doubtful accounts . accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and generally do not bear interest . the company estimates the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts by analyzing accounts receivable balances by age and applying historical write-off and collection trend rates . the company 2019s estimates include separately providing for customer balances based on specific circumstances and credit conditions , and when it is deemed probable that the balance is uncollectible . account balances are charged off against the allowance when it is determined the receivable will not be recovered . the company 2019s allowance for doubtful accounts balance also includes an allowance for the expected return of products shipped and credits related to pricing or quantities shipped of $ 15 million as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 and $ 14 million as of december 31 , 2013 . returns and credit activity is recorded directly to sales . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 81</td><td>$ 73</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>bad debt expense</td><td>26</td><td>23</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( a )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 75</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 81</td></tr></table> ( a ) other amounts are primarily the effects of changes in currency translations and the impact of allowance for returns and credits . inventory valuations inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market . certain u.s . inventory costs are determined on a last-in , first-out ( lifo ) basis . lifo inventories represented 39% ( 39 % ) and 37% ( 37 % ) of consolidated inventories as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . lifo inventories include certain legacy nalco u.s . inventory acquired at fair value as part of the nalco merger . all other inventory costs are determined using either the average cost or first-in , first-out ( fifo ) methods . inventory values at fifo , as shown in note 5 , approximate replacement during the fourth quarter of 2015 , the company improved estimates related to its inventory reserves and product costing , resulting in a net pre-tax charge of approximately $ 6 million . separately , the actions resulted in charge of $ 20.6 million related to inventory reserve calculations , partially offset by a gain of $ 14.5 million related to the capitalization of certain cost components into inventory . both of these items are reflected in note 3. .
Question: what was the percent of lifo inventories as a percent of consolidated inventories as of december 31, 2015?
Answer: 39.0
Question: and what was that in 2014?
| 37.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
concentration of credit risk credit risk represents the accounting loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counterparties failed to perform as contracted . the company believes the likelihood of incurring material losses due to concentration of credit risk is remote . the principal financial instruments subject to credit risk are as follows : cash and cash equivalents - the company maintains cash deposits with major banks , which from time to time may exceed insured limits . the possibility of loss related to financial condition of major banks has been deemed minimal . additionally , the company 2019s investment policy limits exposure to concentrations of credit risk and changes in market conditions . accounts receivable - a large number of customers in diverse industries and geographies , as well as the practice of establishing reasonable credit lines , limits credit risk . based on historical trends and experiences , the allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate to cover potential credit risk losses . foreign currency and interest rate contracts and derivatives - exposure to credit risk is limited by internal policies and active monitoring of counterparty risks . in addition , the company uses a diversified group of major international banks and financial institutions as counterparties . the company does not anticipate nonperformance by any of these counterparties . cash and cash equivalents cash equivalents include highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased . accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts accounts receivable are carried at their face amounts less an allowance for doubtful accounts . accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and generally do not bear interest . the company estimates the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts by analyzing accounts receivable balances by age and applying historical write-off and collection trend rates . the company 2019s estimates include separately providing for customer balances based on specific circumstances and credit conditions , and when it is deemed probable that the balance is uncollectible . account balances are charged off against the allowance when it is determined the receivable will not be recovered . the company 2019s allowance for doubtful accounts balance also includes an allowance for the expected return of products shipped and credits related to pricing or quantities shipped of $ 15 million as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 and $ 14 million as of december 31 , 2013 . returns and credit activity is recorded directly to sales . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 81</td><td>$ 73</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>bad debt expense</td><td>26</td><td>23</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( a )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 75</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 81</td></tr></table> ( a ) other amounts are primarily the effects of changes in currency translations and the impact of allowance for returns and credits . inventory valuations inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market . certain u.s . inventory costs are determined on a last-in , first-out ( lifo ) basis . lifo inventories represented 39% ( 39 % ) and 37% ( 37 % ) of consolidated inventories as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . lifo inventories include certain legacy nalco u.s . inventory acquired at fair value as part of the nalco merger . all other inventory costs are determined using either the average cost or first-in , first-out ( fifo ) methods . inventory values at fifo , as shown in note 5 , approximate replacement during the fourth quarter of 2015 , the company improved estimates related to its inventory reserves and product costing , resulting in a net pre-tax charge of approximately $ 6 million . separately , the actions resulted in charge of $ 20.6 million related to inventory reserve calculations , partially offset by a gain of $ 14.5 million related to the capitalization of certain cost components into inventory . both of these items are reflected in note 3. .
Question: what was the percent of lifo inventories as a percent of consolidated inventories as of december 31, 2015?
Answer: 39.0
Question: and what was that in 2014?
Answer: 37.0
Question: what was, then, the combined percent of lifo inventories as a percent of consolidated inventories for both years?
| 76.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
concentration of credit risk credit risk represents the accounting loss that would be recognized at the reporting date if counterparties failed to perform as contracted . the company believes the likelihood of incurring material losses due to concentration of credit risk is remote . the principal financial instruments subject to credit risk are as follows : cash and cash equivalents - the company maintains cash deposits with major banks , which from time to time may exceed insured limits . the possibility of loss related to financial condition of major banks has been deemed minimal . additionally , the company 2019s investment policy limits exposure to concentrations of credit risk and changes in market conditions . accounts receivable - a large number of customers in diverse industries and geographies , as well as the practice of establishing reasonable credit lines , limits credit risk . based on historical trends and experiences , the allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate to cover potential credit risk losses . foreign currency and interest rate contracts and derivatives - exposure to credit risk is limited by internal policies and active monitoring of counterparty risks . in addition , the company uses a diversified group of major international banks and financial institutions as counterparties . the company does not anticipate nonperformance by any of these counterparties . cash and cash equivalents cash equivalents include highly-liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased . accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts accounts receivable are carried at their face amounts less an allowance for doubtful accounts . accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and generally do not bear interest . the company estimates the balance of allowance for doubtful accounts by analyzing accounts receivable balances by age and applying historical write-off and collection trend rates . the company 2019s estimates include separately providing for customer balances based on specific circumstances and credit conditions , and when it is deemed probable that the balance is uncollectible . account balances are charged off against the allowance when it is determined the receivable will not be recovered . the company 2019s allowance for doubtful accounts balance also includes an allowance for the expected return of products shipped and credits related to pricing or quantities shipped of $ 15 million as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 and $ 14 million as of december 31 , 2013 . returns and credit activity is recorded directly to sales . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning balance</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 81</td><td>$ 73</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>bad debt expense</td><td>26</td><td>23</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>write-offs</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td><td>-21 ( 21 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( a )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ending balance</td><td>$ 75</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 81</td></tr></table> ( a ) other amounts are primarily the effects of changes in currency translations and the impact of allowance for returns and credits . inventory valuations inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market . certain u.s . inventory costs are determined on a last-in , first-out ( lifo ) basis . lifo inventories represented 39% ( 39 % ) and 37% ( 37 % ) of consolidated inventories as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . lifo inventories include certain legacy nalco u.s . inventory acquired at fair value as part of the nalco merger . all other inventory costs are determined using either the average cost or first-in , first-out ( fifo ) methods . inventory values at fifo , as shown in note 5 , approximate replacement during the fourth quarter of 2015 , the company improved estimates related to its inventory reserves and product costing , resulting in a net pre-tax charge of approximately $ 6 million . separately , the actions resulted in charge of $ 20.6 million related to inventory reserve calculations , partially offset by a gain of $ 14.5 million related to the capitalization of certain cost components into inventory . both of these items are reflected in note 3. .
Question: what was the percent of lifo inventories as a percent of consolidated inventories as of december 31, 2015?
Answer: 39.0
Question: and what was that in 2014?
Answer: 37.0
Question: what was, then, the combined percent of lifo inventories as a percent of consolidated inventories for both years?
Answer: 76.0
Question: and what is the average annual percent for that same period?
| 38.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the regulatory credit resulting from reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate variance is due to the reduction of the vidalia purchased power agreement regulatory liability by $ 30.5 million and the reduction of the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation regulatory liabilities by $ 25 million as a result of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act , in december 2017 , which lowered the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) . the effects of the tax cuts and jobs act are discussed further in note 3 to the financial statements . the grand gulf recovery variance is primarily due to increased recovery of higher operating costs . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge in 2016 for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales , partially offset by an increase in industrial usage . the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to new customers in the primary metals industry and expansion projects and an increase in demand for existing customers in the chlor-alkali industry . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 1542</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fitzpatrick sale</td><td>-158 ( 158 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nuclear volume</td><td>-89 ( 89 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fitzpatrick reimbursement agreement</td><td>57</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nuclear fuel expenses</td><td>108</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2017 net revenue</td><td>$ 1469</td></tr></table> as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 73 million in 2017 primarily due to the absence of net revenue from the fitzpatrick plant after it was sold to exelon in march 2017 and lower volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more outage days in 2017 as compared to 2016 . the decrease was partially offset by an increase resulting from the reimbursement agreement with exelon pursuant to which exelon reimbursed entergy for specified out-of-pocket costs associated with preparing for the refueling and operation of fitzpatrick that otherwise would have been avoided had entergy shut down fitzpatrick in january 2017 and a decrease in nuclear fuel expenses primarily related to the impairments of the indian point 2 , indian point 3 , and palisades plants and related assets . revenues received from exelon in 2017 under the reimbursement agreement are offset by other operation and maintenance expenses and taxes other than income taxes and had no effect on net income . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the sale of fitzpatrick , the reimbursement agreement with exelon , and the impairments and related charges . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what was the value change in net revenue from 2016 to 2017?
| 73.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
the regulatory credit resulting from reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate variance is due to the reduction of the vidalia purchased power agreement regulatory liability by $ 30.5 million and the reduction of the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation regulatory liabilities by $ 25 million as a result of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act , in december 2017 , which lowered the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) . the effects of the tax cuts and jobs act are discussed further in note 3 to the financial statements . the grand gulf recovery variance is primarily due to increased recovery of higher operating costs . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge in 2016 for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales , partially offset by an increase in industrial usage . the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to new customers in the primary metals industry and expansion projects and an increase in demand for existing customers in the chlor-alkali industry . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016 net revenue</td><td>$ 1542</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>fitzpatrick sale</td><td>-158 ( 158 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nuclear volume</td><td>-89 ( 89 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fitzpatrick reimbursement agreement</td><td>57</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nuclear fuel expenses</td><td>108</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2017 net revenue</td><td>$ 1469</td></tr></table> as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 73 million in 2017 primarily due to the absence of net revenue from the fitzpatrick plant after it was sold to exelon in march 2017 and lower volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more outage days in 2017 as compared to 2016 . the decrease was partially offset by an increase resulting from the reimbursement agreement with exelon pursuant to which exelon reimbursed entergy for specified out-of-pocket costs associated with preparing for the refueling and operation of fitzpatrick that otherwise would have been avoided had entergy shut down fitzpatrick in january 2017 and a decrease in nuclear fuel expenses primarily related to the impairments of the indian point 2 , indian point 3 , and palisades plants and related assets . revenues received from exelon in 2017 under the reimbursement agreement are offset by other operation and maintenance expenses and taxes other than income taxes and had no effect on net income . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the sale of fitzpatrick , the reimbursement agreement with exelon , and the impairments and related charges . entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .
Question: what was the value change in net revenue from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 73.0
Question: what was the percent change?
| 0.04969 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
management 2019s discussion and analysis 110 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report 2012 compared with 2011 net loss was $ 2.0 billion , compared with a net income of $ 919 million in the prior year . private equity reported net income of $ 292 million , compared with net income of $ 391 million in the prior year . net revenue was $ 601 million , compared with $ 836 million in the prior year , due to lower unrealized and realized gains on private investments , partially offset by higher unrealized gains on public securities . noninterest expense was $ 145 million , down from $ 238 million in the prior year . treasury and cio reported a net loss of $ 2.1 billion , compared with net income of $ 1.3 billion in the prior year . net revenue was a loss of $ 3.1 billion , compared with net revenue of $ 3.2 billion in the prior year . the current year loss reflected $ 5.8 billion of losses incurred by cio from the synthetic credit portfolio for the six months ended june 30 , 2012 , and $ 449 million of losses from the retained index credit derivative positions for the three months ended september 30 , 2012 . these losses were partially offset by securities gains of $ 2.0 billion . the current year revenue reflected $ 888 million of extinguishment gains related to the redemption of trust preferred securities , which are included in all other income in the above table . the extinguishment gains were related to adjustments applied to the cost basis of the trust preferred securities during the period they were in a qualified hedge accounting relationship . net interest income was negative $ 683 million , compared with $ 1.4 billion in the prior year , primarily reflecting the impact of lower portfolio yields and higher deposit balances across the firm . other corporate reported a net loss of $ 221 million , compared with a net loss of $ 821 million in the prior year . noninterest revenue of $ 1.8 billion was driven by a $ 1.1 billion benefit for the washington mutual bankruptcy settlement , which is included in all other income in the above table , and a $ 665 million gain from the recovery on a bear stearns-related subordinated loan . noninterest expense of $ 3.8 billion was up $ 1.0 billion compared with the prior year . the current year included expense of $ 3.7 billion for additional litigation reserves , largely for mortgage-related matters . the prior year included expense of $ 3.2 billion for additional litigation reserves . treasury and cio overview treasury and cio are predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding and structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks , as well as executing the firm 2019s capital plan . the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off-balance sheet assets and liabilities . cio achieves the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high-quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s afs and htm investment securities portfolios ( the 201cinvestment securities portfolio 201d ) . cio also uses derivatives , as well as securities that are not classified as afs or htm , to meet the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives . for further information on derivatives , see note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . for further information about securities not classified within the afs or htm portfolio , see note 3 on pages 195 2013215 of this annual report . the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio primarily consists of u.s . and non-u.s . government securities , agency and non-agency mortgage-backed securities , other asset-backed securities , corporate debt securities and obligations of u.s . states and municipalities . at december 31 , 2013 , the total treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was $ 347.6 billion ; the average credit rating of the securities comprising the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) . see note 12 on pages 249 2013254 of this annual report for further information on the details of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . for further information on liquidity and funding risk , see liquidity risk management on pages 168 2013173 of this annual report . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , treasury and cio value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) and the firm 2019s structural interest rate-sensitive revenue at risk , see market risk management on pages 142 2013148 of this annual report . selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2013 2012 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities gains</td><td>$ 659</td><td>$ 2028</td><td>$ 1385</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( average )</td><td>353712</td><td>358029</td><td>330885</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) ( a )</td><td>347562</td><td>365421</td><td>355605</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mortgage loans ( average )</td><td>5145</td><td>10241</td><td>13006</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>mortgage loans ( period-end )</td><td>3779</td><td>7037</td><td>13375</td></tr></table> ( a ) period-end investment securities included held-to-maturity balance of $ 24.0 billion at december 31 , 2013 . held-to-maturity balances for the other periods were not material. .
Question: in the year of 2013, what what was the balance in the investment securities portfolio, in billions?
| 347.562 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
management 2019s discussion and analysis 110 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report 2012 compared with 2011 net loss was $ 2.0 billion , compared with a net income of $ 919 million in the prior year . private equity reported net income of $ 292 million , compared with net income of $ 391 million in the prior year . net revenue was $ 601 million , compared with $ 836 million in the prior year , due to lower unrealized and realized gains on private investments , partially offset by higher unrealized gains on public securities . noninterest expense was $ 145 million , down from $ 238 million in the prior year . treasury and cio reported a net loss of $ 2.1 billion , compared with net income of $ 1.3 billion in the prior year . net revenue was a loss of $ 3.1 billion , compared with net revenue of $ 3.2 billion in the prior year . the current year loss reflected $ 5.8 billion of losses incurred by cio from the synthetic credit portfolio for the six months ended june 30 , 2012 , and $ 449 million of losses from the retained index credit derivative positions for the three months ended september 30 , 2012 . these losses were partially offset by securities gains of $ 2.0 billion . the current year revenue reflected $ 888 million of extinguishment gains related to the redemption of trust preferred securities , which are included in all other income in the above table . the extinguishment gains were related to adjustments applied to the cost basis of the trust preferred securities during the period they were in a qualified hedge accounting relationship . net interest income was negative $ 683 million , compared with $ 1.4 billion in the prior year , primarily reflecting the impact of lower portfolio yields and higher deposit balances across the firm . other corporate reported a net loss of $ 221 million , compared with a net loss of $ 821 million in the prior year . noninterest revenue of $ 1.8 billion was driven by a $ 1.1 billion benefit for the washington mutual bankruptcy settlement , which is included in all other income in the above table , and a $ 665 million gain from the recovery on a bear stearns-related subordinated loan . noninterest expense of $ 3.8 billion was up $ 1.0 billion compared with the prior year . the current year included expense of $ 3.7 billion for additional litigation reserves , largely for mortgage-related matters . the prior year included expense of $ 3.2 billion for additional litigation reserves . treasury and cio overview treasury and cio are predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding and structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks , as well as executing the firm 2019s capital plan . the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off-balance sheet assets and liabilities . cio achieves the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high-quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s afs and htm investment securities portfolios ( the 201cinvestment securities portfolio 201d ) . cio also uses derivatives , as well as securities that are not classified as afs or htm , to meet the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives . for further information on derivatives , see note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . for further information about securities not classified within the afs or htm portfolio , see note 3 on pages 195 2013215 of this annual report . the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio primarily consists of u.s . and non-u.s . government securities , agency and non-agency mortgage-backed securities , other asset-backed securities , corporate debt securities and obligations of u.s . states and municipalities . at december 31 , 2013 , the total treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was $ 347.6 billion ; the average credit rating of the securities comprising the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) . see note 12 on pages 249 2013254 of this annual report for further information on the details of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . for further information on liquidity and funding risk , see liquidity risk management on pages 168 2013173 of this annual report . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , treasury and cio value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) and the firm 2019s structural interest rate-sensitive revenue at risk , see market risk management on pages 142 2013148 of this annual report . selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2013 2012 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities gains</td><td>$ 659</td><td>$ 2028</td><td>$ 1385</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( average )</td><td>353712</td><td>358029</td><td>330885</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) ( a )</td><td>347562</td><td>365421</td><td>355605</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mortgage loans ( average )</td><td>5145</td><td>10241</td><td>13006</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>mortgage loans ( period-end )</td><td>3779</td><td>7037</td><td>13375</td></tr></table> ( a ) period-end investment securities included held-to-maturity balance of $ 24.0 billion at december 31 , 2013 . held-to-maturity balances for the other periods were not material. .
Question: in the year of 2013, what what was the balance in the investment securities portfolio, in billions?
Answer: 347.562
Question: and what would be that balance without the htm securities?
| 323.562 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
management 2019s discussion and analysis 110 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report 2012 compared with 2011 net loss was $ 2.0 billion , compared with a net income of $ 919 million in the prior year . private equity reported net income of $ 292 million , compared with net income of $ 391 million in the prior year . net revenue was $ 601 million , compared with $ 836 million in the prior year , due to lower unrealized and realized gains on private investments , partially offset by higher unrealized gains on public securities . noninterest expense was $ 145 million , down from $ 238 million in the prior year . treasury and cio reported a net loss of $ 2.1 billion , compared with net income of $ 1.3 billion in the prior year . net revenue was a loss of $ 3.1 billion , compared with net revenue of $ 3.2 billion in the prior year . the current year loss reflected $ 5.8 billion of losses incurred by cio from the synthetic credit portfolio for the six months ended june 30 , 2012 , and $ 449 million of losses from the retained index credit derivative positions for the three months ended september 30 , 2012 . these losses were partially offset by securities gains of $ 2.0 billion . the current year revenue reflected $ 888 million of extinguishment gains related to the redemption of trust preferred securities , which are included in all other income in the above table . the extinguishment gains were related to adjustments applied to the cost basis of the trust preferred securities during the period they were in a qualified hedge accounting relationship . net interest income was negative $ 683 million , compared with $ 1.4 billion in the prior year , primarily reflecting the impact of lower portfolio yields and higher deposit balances across the firm . other corporate reported a net loss of $ 221 million , compared with a net loss of $ 821 million in the prior year . noninterest revenue of $ 1.8 billion was driven by a $ 1.1 billion benefit for the washington mutual bankruptcy settlement , which is included in all other income in the above table , and a $ 665 million gain from the recovery on a bear stearns-related subordinated loan . noninterest expense of $ 3.8 billion was up $ 1.0 billion compared with the prior year . the current year included expense of $ 3.7 billion for additional litigation reserves , largely for mortgage-related matters . the prior year included expense of $ 3.2 billion for additional litigation reserves . treasury and cio overview treasury and cio are predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding and structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks , as well as executing the firm 2019s capital plan . the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off-balance sheet assets and liabilities . cio achieves the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high-quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s afs and htm investment securities portfolios ( the 201cinvestment securities portfolio 201d ) . cio also uses derivatives , as well as securities that are not classified as afs or htm , to meet the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives . for further information on derivatives , see note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . for further information about securities not classified within the afs or htm portfolio , see note 3 on pages 195 2013215 of this annual report . the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio primarily consists of u.s . and non-u.s . government securities , agency and non-agency mortgage-backed securities , other asset-backed securities , corporate debt securities and obligations of u.s . states and municipalities . at december 31 , 2013 , the total treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was $ 347.6 billion ; the average credit rating of the securities comprising the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) . see note 12 on pages 249 2013254 of this annual report for further information on the details of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . for further information on liquidity and funding risk , see liquidity risk management on pages 168 2013173 of this annual report . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , treasury and cio value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) and the firm 2019s structural interest rate-sensitive revenue at risk , see market risk management on pages 142 2013148 of this annual report . selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2013 2012 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities gains</td><td>$ 659</td><td>$ 2028</td><td>$ 1385</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( average )</td><td>353712</td><td>358029</td><td>330885</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) ( a )</td><td>347562</td><td>365421</td><td>355605</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mortgage loans ( average )</td><td>5145</td><td>10241</td><td>13006</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>mortgage loans ( period-end )</td><td>3779</td><td>7037</td><td>13375</td></tr></table> ( a ) period-end investment securities included held-to-maturity balance of $ 24.0 billion at december 31 , 2013 . held-to-maturity balances for the other periods were not material. .
Question: in the year of 2013, what what was the balance in the investment securities portfolio, in billions?
Answer: 347.562
Question: and what would be that balance without the htm securities?
Answer: 323.562
Question: and in the previous year, what was the total of litigation reserves?
| 3.7 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
management 2019s discussion and analysis 110 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report 2012 compared with 2011 net loss was $ 2.0 billion , compared with a net income of $ 919 million in the prior year . private equity reported net income of $ 292 million , compared with net income of $ 391 million in the prior year . net revenue was $ 601 million , compared with $ 836 million in the prior year , due to lower unrealized and realized gains on private investments , partially offset by higher unrealized gains on public securities . noninterest expense was $ 145 million , down from $ 238 million in the prior year . treasury and cio reported a net loss of $ 2.1 billion , compared with net income of $ 1.3 billion in the prior year . net revenue was a loss of $ 3.1 billion , compared with net revenue of $ 3.2 billion in the prior year . the current year loss reflected $ 5.8 billion of losses incurred by cio from the synthetic credit portfolio for the six months ended june 30 , 2012 , and $ 449 million of losses from the retained index credit derivative positions for the three months ended september 30 , 2012 . these losses were partially offset by securities gains of $ 2.0 billion . the current year revenue reflected $ 888 million of extinguishment gains related to the redemption of trust preferred securities , which are included in all other income in the above table . the extinguishment gains were related to adjustments applied to the cost basis of the trust preferred securities during the period they were in a qualified hedge accounting relationship . net interest income was negative $ 683 million , compared with $ 1.4 billion in the prior year , primarily reflecting the impact of lower portfolio yields and higher deposit balances across the firm . other corporate reported a net loss of $ 221 million , compared with a net loss of $ 821 million in the prior year . noninterest revenue of $ 1.8 billion was driven by a $ 1.1 billion benefit for the washington mutual bankruptcy settlement , which is included in all other income in the above table , and a $ 665 million gain from the recovery on a bear stearns-related subordinated loan . noninterest expense of $ 3.8 billion was up $ 1.0 billion compared with the prior year . the current year included expense of $ 3.7 billion for additional litigation reserves , largely for mortgage-related matters . the prior year included expense of $ 3.2 billion for additional litigation reserves . treasury and cio overview treasury and cio are predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding and structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks , as well as executing the firm 2019s capital plan . the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off-balance sheet assets and liabilities . cio achieves the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high-quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s afs and htm investment securities portfolios ( the 201cinvestment securities portfolio 201d ) . cio also uses derivatives , as well as securities that are not classified as afs or htm , to meet the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives . for further information on derivatives , see note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . for further information about securities not classified within the afs or htm portfolio , see note 3 on pages 195 2013215 of this annual report . the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio primarily consists of u.s . and non-u.s . government securities , agency and non-agency mortgage-backed securities , other asset-backed securities , corporate debt securities and obligations of u.s . states and municipalities . at december 31 , 2013 , the total treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was $ 347.6 billion ; the average credit rating of the securities comprising the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) . see note 12 on pages 249 2013254 of this annual report for further information on the details of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . for further information on liquidity and funding risk , see liquidity risk management on pages 168 2013173 of this annual report . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , treasury and cio value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) and the firm 2019s structural interest rate-sensitive revenue at risk , see market risk management on pages 142 2013148 of this annual report . selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2013 2012 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities gains</td><td>$ 659</td><td>$ 2028</td><td>$ 1385</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( average )</td><td>353712</td><td>358029</td><td>330885</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) ( a )</td><td>347562</td><td>365421</td><td>355605</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mortgage loans ( average )</td><td>5145</td><td>10241</td><td>13006</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>mortgage loans ( period-end )</td><td>3779</td><td>7037</td><td>13375</td></tr></table> ( a ) period-end investment securities included held-to-maturity balance of $ 24.0 billion at december 31 , 2013 . held-to-maturity balances for the other periods were not material. .
Question: in the year of 2013, what what was the balance in the investment securities portfolio, in billions?
Answer: 347.562
Question: and what would be that balance without the htm securities?
Answer: 323.562
Question: and in the previous year, what was the total of litigation reserves?
Answer: 3.7
Question: what was it in 2011?
| 3.2 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
management 2019s discussion and analysis 110 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report 2012 compared with 2011 net loss was $ 2.0 billion , compared with a net income of $ 919 million in the prior year . private equity reported net income of $ 292 million , compared with net income of $ 391 million in the prior year . net revenue was $ 601 million , compared with $ 836 million in the prior year , due to lower unrealized and realized gains on private investments , partially offset by higher unrealized gains on public securities . noninterest expense was $ 145 million , down from $ 238 million in the prior year . treasury and cio reported a net loss of $ 2.1 billion , compared with net income of $ 1.3 billion in the prior year . net revenue was a loss of $ 3.1 billion , compared with net revenue of $ 3.2 billion in the prior year . the current year loss reflected $ 5.8 billion of losses incurred by cio from the synthetic credit portfolio for the six months ended june 30 , 2012 , and $ 449 million of losses from the retained index credit derivative positions for the three months ended september 30 , 2012 . these losses were partially offset by securities gains of $ 2.0 billion . the current year revenue reflected $ 888 million of extinguishment gains related to the redemption of trust preferred securities , which are included in all other income in the above table . the extinguishment gains were related to adjustments applied to the cost basis of the trust preferred securities during the period they were in a qualified hedge accounting relationship . net interest income was negative $ 683 million , compared with $ 1.4 billion in the prior year , primarily reflecting the impact of lower portfolio yields and higher deposit balances across the firm . other corporate reported a net loss of $ 221 million , compared with a net loss of $ 821 million in the prior year . noninterest revenue of $ 1.8 billion was driven by a $ 1.1 billion benefit for the washington mutual bankruptcy settlement , which is included in all other income in the above table , and a $ 665 million gain from the recovery on a bear stearns-related subordinated loan . noninterest expense of $ 3.8 billion was up $ 1.0 billion compared with the prior year . the current year included expense of $ 3.7 billion for additional litigation reserves , largely for mortgage-related matters . the prior year included expense of $ 3.2 billion for additional litigation reserves . treasury and cio overview treasury and cio are predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding and structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks , as well as executing the firm 2019s capital plan . the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off-balance sheet assets and liabilities . cio achieves the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high-quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s afs and htm investment securities portfolios ( the 201cinvestment securities portfolio 201d ) . cio also uses derivatives , as well as securities that are not classified as afs or htm , to meet the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives . for further information on derivatives , see note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . for further information about securities not classified within the afs or htm portfolio , see note 3 on pages 195 2013215 of this annual report . the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio primarily consists of u.s . and non-u.s . government securities , agency and non-agency mortgage-backed securities , other asset-backed securities , corporate debt securities and obligations of u.s . states and municipalities . at december 31 , 2013 , the total treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was $ 347.6 billion ; the average credit rating of the securities comprising the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) . see note 12 on pages 249 2013254 of this annual report for further information on the details of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . for further information on liquidity and funding risk , see liquidity risk management on pages 168 2013173 of this annual report . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , treasury and cio value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) and the firm 2019s structural interest rate-sensitive revenue at risk , see market risk management on pages 142 2013148 of this annual report . selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2013 2012 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities gains</td><td>$ 659</td><td>$ 2028</td><td>$ 1385</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( average )</td><td>353712</td><td>358029</td><td>330885</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) ( a )</td><td>347562</td><td>365421</td><td>355605</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mortgage loans ( average )</td><td>5145</td><td>10241</td><td>13006</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>mortgage loans ( period-end )</td><td>3779</td><td>7037</td><td>13375</td></tr></table> ( a ) period-end investment securities included held-to-maturity balance of $ 24.0 billion at december 31 , 2013 . held-to-maturity balances for the other periods were not material. .
Question: in the year of 2013, what what was the balance in the investment securities portfolio, in billions?
Answer: 347.562
Question: and what would be that balance without the htm securities?
Answer: 323.562
Question: and in the previous year, what was the total of litigation reserves?
Answer: 3.7
Question: what was it in 2011?
Answer: 3.2
Question: by how much, then, did it increase from 2011 to 2012?
| 0.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
management 2019s discussion and analysis 110 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report 2012 compared with 2011 net loss was $ 2.0 billion , compared with a net income of $ 919 million in the prior year . private equity reported net income of $ 292 million , compared with net income of $ 391 million in the prior year . net revenue was $ 601 million , compared with $ 836 million in the prior year , due to lower unrealized and realized gains on private investments , partially offset by higher unrealized gains on public securities . noninterest expense was $ 145 million , down from $ 238 million in the prior year . treasury and cio reported a net loss of $ 2.1 billion , compared with net income of $ 1.3 billion in the prior year . net revenue was a loss of $ 3.1 billion , compared with net revenue of $ 3.2 billion in the prior year . the current year loss reflected $ 5.8 billion of losses incurred by cio from the synthetic credit portfolio for the six months ended june 30 , 2012 , and $ 449 million of losses from the retained index credit derivative positions for the three months ended september 30 , 2012 . these losses were partially offset by securities gains of $ 2.0 billion . the current year revenue reflected $ 888 million of extinguishment gains related to the redemption of trust preferred securities , which are included in all other income in the above table . the extinguishment gains were related to adjustments applied to the cost basis of the trust preferred securities during the period they were in a qualified hedge accounting relationship . net interest income was negative $ 683 million , compared with $ 1.4 billion in the prior year , primarily reflecting the impact of lower portfolio yields and higher deposit balances across the firm . other corporate reported a net loss of $ 221 million , compared with a net loss of $ 821 million in the prior year . noninterest revenue of $ 1.8 billion was driven by a $ 1.1 billion benefit for the washington mutual bankruptcy settlement , which is included in all other income in the above table , and a $ 665 million gain from the recovery on a bear stearns-related subordinated loan . noninterest expense of $ 3.8 billion was up $ 1.0 billion compared with the prior year . the current year included expense of $ 3.7 billion for additional litigation reserves , largely for mortgage-related matters . the prior year included expense of $ 3.2 billion for additional litigation reserves . treasury and cio overview treasury and cio are predominantly responsible for measuring , monitoring , reporting and managing the firm 2019s liquidity , funding and structural interest rate and foreign exchange risks , as well as executing the firm 2019s capital plan . the risks managed by treasury and cio arise from the activities undertaken by the firm 2019s four major reportable business segments to serve their respective client bases , which generate both on- and off-balance sheet assets and liabilities . cio achieves the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives generally by investing in high-quality securities that are managed for the longer-term as part of the firm 2019s afs and htm investment securities portfolios ( the 201cinvestment securities portfolio 201d ) . cio also uses derivatives , as well as securities that are not classified as afs or htm , to meet the firm 2019s asset-liability management objectives . for further information on derivatives , see note 6 on pages 220 2013233 of this annual report . for further information about securities not classified within the afs or htm portfolio , see note 3 on pages 195 2013215 of this annual report . the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio primarily consists of u.s . and non-u.s . government securities , agency and non-agency mortgage-backed securities , other asset-backed securities , corporate debt securities and obligations of u.s . states and municipalities . at december 31 , 2013 , the total treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was $ 347.6 billion ; the average credit rating of the securities comprising the treasury and cio investment securities portfolio was aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available and where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings that correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) . see note 12 on pages 249 2013254 of this annual report for further information on the details of the firm 2019s investment securities portfolio . for further information on liquidity and funding risk , see liquidity risk management on pages 168 2013173 of this annual report . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange and other risks , treasury and cio value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) and the firm 2019s structural interest rate-sensitive revenue at risk , see market risk management on pages 142 2013148 of this annual report . selected income statement and balance sheet data as of or for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2013 2012 2011 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>as of or for the year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>securities gains</td><td>$ 659</td><td>$ 2028</td><td>$ 1385</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( average )</td><td>353712</td><td>358029</td><td>330885</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>investment securities portfolio ( period 2013end ) ( a )</td><td>347562</td><td>365421</td><td>355605</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>mortgage loans ( average )</td><td>5145</td><td>10241</td><td>13006</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>mortgage loans ( period-end )</td><td>3779</td><td>7037</td><td>13375</td></tr></table> ( a ) period-end investment securities included held-to-maturity balance of $ 24.0 billion at december 31 , 2013 . held-to-maturity balances for the other periods were not material. .
Question: in the year of 2013, what what was the balance in the investment securities portfolio, in billions?
Answer: 347.562
Question: and what would be that balance without the htm securities?
Answer: 323.562
Question: and in the previous year, what was the total of litigation reserves?
Answer: 3.7
Question: what was it in 2011?
Answer: 3.2
Question: by how much, then, did it increase from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 0.5
Question: and what is this increase as a percentage of the reserves?
| 0.15625 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
amount of unrecognized tax benefit related to permanent differences because a portion of those unrecognized benefits relate to state tax matters . it is reasonably possible that the liability for uncertain tax positions could increase or decrease in the next twelve months due to completion of tax authorities 2019 exams or the expiration of statutes of limitations . management estimates that the liability for uncertain tax positions could decrease by $ 5 million within the next twelve months . the consolidated federal income tax returns of the pnc financial services group , inc . and subsidiaries through 2003 have been audited by the internal revenue service and we have resolved all disputed matters through the irs appeals division . the internal revenue service is currently examining the 2004 through 2006 consolidated federal income tax returns of the pnc financial services group , inc . and subsidiaries . the consolidated federal income tax returns of national city corporation and subsidiaries through 2004 have been audited by the internal revenue service and we have reached agreement in principle on resolution of all disputed matters through the irs appeals division . however , because the agreement is still subject to execution of a closing agreement we have not treated it as effectively settled . the internal revenue service is currently examining the 2005 through 2007 consolidated federal income tax returns of national city corporation and subsidiaries , and we expect the 2008 federal income tax return to begin being audited as soon as it is filed . new york , new jersey , maryland and new york city are principally where we were subject to state and local income tax prior to our acquisition of national city . the state of new york is currently in the process of closing the 2002 to 2004 audit and will begin auditing the years 2005 and 2006 . new york city is currently auditing 2004 and 2005 . however , years 2002 and 2003 remain subject to examination by new york city pending completion of the new york state audit . through 2006 , blackrock is included in our new york and new york city combined tax filings and constituted most of the tax liability . years subsequent to 2004 remain subject to examination by new jersey and years subsequent to 2005 remain subject to examination by maryland . national city was principally subject to state and local income tax in california , florida , illinois , indiana , and missouri . audits currently in process for these states include : california ( 2003-2004 ) , illinois ( 2004-2006 ) and missouri ( 2003-2005 ) . we will now also be principally subject to tax in those states . in the ordinary course of business we are routinely subject to audit by the taxing authorities of these states and at any given time a number of audits will be in process . our policy is to classify interest and penalties associated with income taxes as income taxes . at january 1 , 2008 , we had accrued $ 91 million of interest related to tax positions , most of which related to our cross-border leasing transactions . the total accrued interest and penalties at december 31 , 2008 was $ 164 million . while the leasing related interest decreased with a payment to the irs , the $ 73 million net increase primarily resulted from our acquisition of national city . note 22 summarized financial information of blackrock as required by sec regulation s-x , summarized consolidated financial information of blackrock follows ( in millions ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total assets</td><td>$ 19924</td><td>$ 22561</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total liabilities</td><td>$ 7367</td><td>$ 10387</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-controlling interest</td><td>491</td><td>578</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>stockholders 2019 equity</td><td>12066</td><td>11596</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total liabilities non-controlling interest and stockholders 2019 equity</td><td>$ 19924</td><td>$ 22561</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>year ended december 31</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total revenue</td><td>$ 5064</td><td>$ 4845</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total expenses</td><td>3471</td><td>3551</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>operating income</td><td>1593</td><td>1294</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>non-operating income ( expense )</td><td>-574 ( 574 )</td><td>529</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>income before income taxes and non-controlling interest</td><td>1019</td><td>1823</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>income taxes</td><td>388</td><td>464</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>non-controlling interest</td><td>-155 ( 155 )</td><td>364</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 786</td><td>$ 995</td></tr></table> note 23 regulatory matters we are subject to the regulations of certain federal and state agencies and undergo periodic examinations by such regulatory authorities . the access to and cost of funding new business initiatives including acquisitions , the ability to pay dividends , the level of deposit insurance costs , and the level and nature of regulatory oversight depend , in large part , on a financial institution 2019s capital strength . the minimum us regulatory capital ratios are 4% ( 4 % ) for tier 1 risk-based , 8% ( 8 % ) for total risk- based and 4% ( 4 % ) for leverage . however , regulators may require higher capital levels when particular circumstances warrant . to qualify as 201cwell capitalized , 201d regulators require banks to maintain capital ratios of at least 6% ( 6 % ) for tier 1 risk-based , 10% ( 10 % ) for total risk-based and 5% ( 5 % ) for leverage . at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , each of our domestic bank subsidiaries met the 201cwell capitalized 201d capital ratio requirements. .
Question: in 2008, what was the difference between the total assets and the total liabilities?
| 12557.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
amount of unrecognized tax benefit related to permanent differences because a portion of those unrecognized benefits relate to state tax matters . it is reasonably possible that the liability for uncertain tax positions could increase or decrease in the next twelve months due to completion of tax authorities 2019 exams or the expiration of statutes of limitations . management estimates that the liability for uncertain tax positions could decrease by $ 5 million within the next twelve months . the consolidated federal income tax returns of the pnc financial services group , inc . and subsidiaries through 2003 have been audited by the internal revenue service and we have resolved all disputed matters through the irs appeals division . the internal revenue service is currently examining the 2004 through 2006 consolidated federal income tax returns of the pnc financial services group , inc . and subsidiaries . the consolidated federal income tax returns of national city corporation and subsidiaries through 2004 have been audited by the internal revenue service and we have reached agreement in principle on resolution of all disputed matters through the irs appeals division . however , because the agreement is still subject to execution of a closing agreement we have not treated it as effectively settled . the internal revenue service is currently examining the 2005 through 2007 consolidated federal income tax returns of national city corporation and subsidiaries , and we expect the 2008 federal income tax return to begin being audited as soon as it is filed . new york , new jersey , maryland and new york city are principally where we were subject to state and local income tax prior to our acquisition of national city . the state of new york is currently in the process of closing the 2002 to 2004 audit and will begin auditing the years 2005 and 2006 . new york city is currently auditing 2004 and 2005 . however , years 2002 and 2003 remain subject to examination by new york city pending completion of the new york state audit . through 2006 , blackrock is included in our new york and new york city combined tax filings and constituted most of the tax liability . years subsequent to 2004 remain subject to examination by new jersey and years subsequent to 2005 remain subject to examination by maryland . national city was principally subject to state and local income tax in california , florida , illinois , indiana , and missouri . audits currently in process for these states include : california ( 2003-2004 ) , illinois ( 2004-2006 ) and missouri ( 2003-2005 ) . we will now also be principally subject to tax in those states . in the ordinary course of business we are routinely subject to audit by the taxing authorities of these states and at any given time a number of audits will be in process . our policy is to classify interest and penalties associated with income taxes as income taxes . at january 1 , 2008 , we had accrued $ 91 million of interest related to tax positions , most of which related to our cross-border leasing transactions . the total accrued interest and penalties at december 31 , 2008 was $ 164 million . while the leasing related interest decreased with a payment to the irs , the $ 73 million net increase primarily resulted from our acquisition of national city . note 22 summarized financial information of blackrock as required by sec regulation s-x , summarized consolidated financial information of blackrock follows ( in millions ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total assets</td><td>$ 19924</td><td>$ 22561</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total liabilities</td><td>$ 7367</td><td>$ 10387</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>non-controlling interest</td><td>491</td><td>578</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>stockholders 2019 equity</td><td>12066</td><td>11596</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total liabilities non-controlling interest and stockholders 2019 equity</td><td>$ 19924</td><td>$ 22561</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>year ended december 31</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total revenue</td><td>$ 5064</td><td>$ 4845</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total expenses</td><td>3471</td><td>3551</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>operating income</td><td>1593</td><td>1294</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>non-operating income ( expense )</td><td>-574 ( 574 )</td><td>529</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>income before income taxes and non-controlling interest</td><td>1019</td><td>1823</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>income taxes</td><td>388</td><td>464</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>non-controlling interest</td><td>-155 ( 155 )</td><td>364</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 786</td><td>$ 995</td></tr></table> note 23 regulatory matters we are subject to the regulations of certain federal and state agencies and undergo periodic examinations by such regulatory authorities . the access to and cost of funding new business initiatives including acquisitions , the ability to pay dividends , the level of deposit insurance costs , and the level and nature of regulatory oversight depend , in large part , on a financial institution 2019s capital strength . the minimum us regulatory capital ratios are 4% ( 4 % ) for tier 1 risk-based , 8% ( 8 % ) for total risk- based and 4% ( 4 % ) for leverage . however , regulators may require higher capital levels when particular circumstances warrant . to qualify as 201cwell capitalized , 201d regulators require banks to maintain capital ratios of at least 6% ( 6 % ) for tier 1 risk-based , 10% ( 10 % ) for total risk-based and 5% ( 5 % ) for leverage . at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , each of our domestic bank subsidiaries met the 201cwell capitalized 201d capital ratio requirements. .
Question: in 2008, what was the difference between the total assets and the total liabilities?
Answer: 12557.0
Question: and how much does this difference represent in relation to the total liabilities?
| 0.58668 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
stock-based compensation 2013 we have several stock-based compensation plans under which employees and non-employee directors receive stock options , nonvested retention shares , and nonvested stock units . we refer to the nonvested shares and stock units collectively as 201cretention awards 201d . we issue treasury shares to cover option exercises and stock unit vestings , while new shares are issued when retention shares vest . we adopted fasb statement no . 123 ( r ) , share-based payment ( fas 123 ( r ) ) , on january 1 , 2006 . fas 123 ( r ) requires us to measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees and directors , including stock options . compensation expense is based on the calculated fair value of the awards as measured at the grant date and is expensed ratably over the service period of the awards ( generally the vesting period ) . the fair value of retention awards is the stock price on the date of grant , while the fair value of stock options is determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . we elected to use the modified prospective transition method as permitted by fas 123 ( r ) and did not restate financial results for prior periods . we did not make an adjustment for the cumulative effect of these estimated forfeitures , as the impact was not material . as a result of the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we recognized expense for stock options in 2006 , in addition to retention awards , which were expensed prior to 2006 . stock-based compensation expense for the year ended december 31 , 2006 was $ 22 million , after tax , or $ 0.08 per basic and diluted share . this includes $ 9 million for stock options and $ 13 million for retention awards for 2006 . before taxes , stock-based compensation expense included $ 14 million for stock options and $ 21 million for retention awards for 2006 . we recorded $ 29 million of excess tax benefits as an inflow of financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . prior to the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we applied the recognition and measurement principles of accounting principles board opinion no . 25 , accounting for stock issued to employees , and related interpretations . no stock- based employee compensation expense related to stock option grants was reflected in net income , as all options granted under those plans had a grant price equal to the market value of our common stock on the date of grant . stock-based compensation expense related to retention shares , stock units , and other incentive plans was reflected in net income . the following table details the effect on net income and earnings per share had compensation expense for all of our stock-based awards , including stock options , been recorded in the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 based on the fair value method under fasb statement no . 123 , accounting for stock-based compensation . pro forma stock-based compensation expense year ended december 31 , millions of dollars , except per share amounts 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>millions of dollars except per share amounts</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income as reported</td><td>$ 1026</td><td>$ 604</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>stock-based employee compensation expense reported in net income net of tax</td><td>13</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value 2013based method for allawards net of tax [a]</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pro forma net income</td><td>$ 989</td><td>$ 582</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic as reported</td><td>$ 3.89</td><td>$ 2.33</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma</td><td>$ 3.75</td><td>$ 2.25</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted as reported</td><td>$ 3.85</td><td>$ 2.30</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted pro forma</td><td>$ 3.71</td><td>$ 2.22</td></tr></table> [a] stock options for executives granted in 2003 and 2002 included a reload feature . this reload feature allowed executives to exercise their options using shares of union pacific corporation common stock that they already owned and obtain a new grant of options in the amount of the shares used for exercise plus any shares withheld for tax purposes . the reload feature of these option grants could only be exercised if the .
Question: what was earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma in 2004?
| 2.25 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
stock-based compensation 2013 we have several stock-based compensation plans under which employees and non-employee directors receive stock options , nonvested retention shares , and nonvested stock units . we refer to the nonvested shares and stock units collectively as 201cretention awards 201d . we issue treasury shares to cover option exercises and stock unit vestings , while new shares are issued when retention shares vest . we adopted fasb statement no . 123 ( r ) , share-based payment ( fas 123 ( r ) ) , on january 1 , 2006 . fas 123 ( r ) requires us to measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees and directors , including stock options . compensation expense is based on the calculated fair value of the awards as measured at the grant date and is expensed ratably over the service period of the awards ( generally the vesting period ) . the fair value of retention awards is the stock price on the date of grant , while the fair value of stock options is determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . we elected to use the modified prospective transition method as permitted by fas 123 ( r ) and did not restate financial results for prior periods . we did not make an adjustment for the cumulative effect of these estimated forfeitures , as the impact was not material . as a result of the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we recognized expense for stock options in 2006 , in addition to retention awards , which were expensed prior to 2006 . stock-based compensation expense for the year ended december 31 , 2006 was $ 22 million , after tax , or $ 0.08 per basic and diluted share . this includes $ 9 million for stock options and $ 13 million for retention awards for 2006 . before taxes , stock-based compensation expense included $ 14 million for stock options and $ 21 million for retention awards for 2006 . we recorded $ 29 million of excess tax benefits as an inflow of financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . prior to the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we applied the recognition and measurement principles of accounting principles board opinion no . 25 , accounting for stock issued to employees , and related interpretations . no stock- based employee compensation expense related to stock option grants was reflected in net income , as all options granted under those plans had a grant price equal to the market value of our common stock on the date of grant . stock-based compensation expense related to retention shares , stock units , and other incentive plans was reflected in net income . the following table details the effect on net income and earnings per share had compensation expense for all of our stock-based awards , including stock options , been recorded in the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 based on the fair value method under fasb statement no . 123 , accounting for stock-based compensation . pro forma stock-based compensation expense year ended december 31 , millions of dollars , except per share amounts 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>millions of dollars except per share amounts</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income as reported</td><td>$ 1026</td><td>$ 604</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>stock-based employee compensation expense reported in net income net of tax</td><td>13</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value 2013based method for allawards net of tax [a]</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pro forma net income</td><td>$ 989</td><td>$ 582</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic as reported</td><td>$ 3.89</td><td>$ 2.33</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma</td><td>$ 3.75</td><td>$ 2.25</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted as reported</td><td>$ 3.85</td><td>$ 2.30</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted pro forma</td><td>$ 3.71</td><td>$ 2.22</td></tr></table> [a] stock options for executives granted in 2003 and 2002 included a reload feature . this reload feature allowed executives to exercise their options using shares of union pacific corporation common stock that they already owned and obtain a new grant of options in the amount of the shares used for exercise plus any shares withheld for tax purposes . the reload feature of these option grants could only be exercised if the .
Question: what was earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma in 2004?
Answer: 2.25
Question: what were earnings per share 2013 diluted pro forma in 2004?
| 2.22 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
stock-based compensation 2013 we have several stock-based compensation plans under which employees and non-employee directors receive stock options , nonvested retention shares , and nonvested stock units . we refer to the nonvested shares and stock units collectively as 201cretention awards 201d . we issue treasury shares to cover option exercises and stock unit vestings , while new shares are issued when retention shares vest . we adopted fasb statement no . 123 ( r ) , share-based payment ( fas 123 ( r ) ) , on january 1 , 2006 . fas 123 ( r ) requires us to measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees and directors , including stock options . compensation expense is based on the calculated fair value of the awards as measured at the grant date and is expensed ratably over the service period of the awards ( generally the vesting period ) . the fair value of retention awards is the stock price on the date of grant , while the fair value of stock options is determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . we elected to use the modified prospective transition method as permitted by fas 123 ( r ) and did not restate financial results for prior periods . we did not make an adjustment for the cumulative effect of these estimated forfeitures , as the impact was not material . as a result of the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we recognized expense for stock options in 2006 , in addition to retention awards , which were expensed prior to 2006 . stock-based compensation expense for the year ended december 31 , 2006 was $ 22 million , after tax , or $ 0.08 per basic and diluted share . this includes $ 9 million for stock options and $ 13 million for retention awards for 2006 . before taxes , stock-based compensation expense included $ 14 million for stock options and $ 21 million for retention awards for 2006 . we recorded $ 29 million of excess tax benefits as an inflow of financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . prior to the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we applied the recognition and measurement principles of accounting principles board opinion no . 25 , accounting for stock issued to employees , and related interpretations . no stock- based employee compensation expense related to stock option grants was reflected in net income , as all options granted under those plans had a grant price equal to the market value of our common stock on the date of grant . stock-based compensation expense related to retention shares , stock units , and other incentive plans was reflected in net income . the following table details the effect on net income and earnings per share had compensation expense for all of our stock-based awards , including stock options , been recorded in the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 based on the fair value method under fasb statement no . 123 , accounting for stock-based compensation . pro forma stock-based compensation expense year ended december 31 , millions of dollars , except per share amounts 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>millions of dollars except per share amounts</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income as reported</td><td>$ 1026</td><td>$ 604</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>stock-based employee compensation expense reported in net income net of tax</td><td>13</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value 2013based method for allawards net of tax [a]</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pro forma net income</td><td>$ 989</td><td>$ 582</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic as reported</td><td>$ 3.89</td><td>$ 2.33</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma</td><td>$ 3.75</td><td>$ 2.25</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted as reported</td><td>$ 3.85</td><td>$ 2.30</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted pro forma</td><td>$ 3.71</td><td>$ 2.22</td></tr></table> [a] stock options for executives granted in 2003 and 2002 included a reload feature . this reload feature allowed executives to exercise their options using shares of union pacific corporation common stock that they already owned and obtain a new grant of options in the amount of the shares used for exercise plus any shares withheld for tax purposes . the reload feature of these option grants could only be exercised if the .
Question: what was earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma in 2004?
Answer: 2.25
Question: what were earnings per share 2013 diluted pro forma in 2004?
Answer: 2.22
Question: what is the difference?
| 0.03 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
stock-based compensation 2013 we have several stock-based compensation plans under which employees and non-employee directors receive stock options , nonvested retention shares , and nonvested stock units . we refer to the nonvested shares and stock units collectively as 201cretention awards 201d . we issue treasury shares to cover option exercises and stock unit vestings , while new shares are issued when retention shares vest . we adopted fasb statement no . 123 ( r ) , share-based payment ( fas 123 ( r ) ) , on january 1 , 2006 . fas 123 ( r ) requires us to measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees and directors , including stock options . compensation expense is based on the calculated fair value of the awards as measured at the grant date and is expensed ratably over the service period of the awards ( generally the vesting period ) . the fair value of retention awards is the stock price on the date of grant , while the fair value of stock options is determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . we elected to use the modified prospective transition method as permitted by fas 123 ( r ) and did not restate financial results for prior periods . we did not make an adjustment for the cumulative effect of these estimated forfeitures , as the impact was not material . as a result of the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we recognized expense for stock options in 2006 , in addition to retention awards , which were expensed prior to 2006 . stock-based compensation expense for the year ended december 31 , 2006 was $ 22 million , after tax , or $ 0.08 per basic and diluted share . this includes $ 9 million for stock options and $ 13 million for retention awards for 2006 . before taxes , stock-based compensation expense included $ 14 million for stock options and $ 21 million for retention awards for 2006 . we recorded $ 29 million of excess tax benefits as an inflow of financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . prior to the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we applied the recognition and measurement principles of accounting principles board opinion no . 25 , accounting for stock issued to employees , and related interpretations . no stock- based employee compensation expense related to stock option grants was reflected in net income , as all options granted under those plans had a grant price equal to the market value of our common stock on the date of grant . stock-based compensation expense related to retention shares , stock units , and other incentive plans was reflected in net income . the following table details the effect on net income and earnings per share had compensation expense for all of our stock-based awards , including stock options , been recorded in the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 based on the fair value method under fasb statement no . 123 , accounting for stock-based compensation . pro forma stock-based compensation expense year ended december 31 , millions of dollars , except per share amounts 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>millions of dollars except per share amounts</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income as reported</td><td>$ 1026</td><td>$ 604</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>stock-based employee compensation expense reported in net income net of tax</td><td>13</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value 2013based method for allawards net of tax [a]</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pro forma net income</td><td>$ 989</td><td>$ 582</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic as reported</td><td>$ 3.89</td><td>$ 2.33</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma</td><td>$ 3.75</td><td>$ 2.25</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted as reported</td><td>$ 3.85</td><td>$ 2.30</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted pro forma</td><td>$ 3.71</td><td>$ 2.22</td></tr></table> [a] stock options for executives granted in 2003 and 2002 included a reload feature . this reload feature allowed executives to exercise their options using shares of union pacific corporation common stock that they already owned and obtain a new grant of options in the amount of the shares used for exercise plus any shares withheld for tax purposes . the reload feature of these option grants could only be exercised if the .
Question: what was earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma in 2004?
Answer: 2.25
Question: what were earnings per share 2013 diluted pro forma in 2004?
Answer: 2.22
Question: what is the difference?
Answer: 0.03
Question: what was the eps 2013 basic pro forma?
| 2.25 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
stock-based compensation 2013 we have several stock-based compensation plans under which employees and non-employee directors receive stock options , nonvested retention shares , and nonvested stock units . we refer to the nonvested shares and stock units collectively as 201cretention awards 201d . we issue treasury shares to cover option exercises and stock unit vestings , while new shares are issued when retention shares vest . we adopted fasb statement no . 123 ( r ) , share-based payment ( fas 123 ( r ) ) , on january 1 , 2006 . fas 123 ( r ) requires us to measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees and directors , including stock options . compensation expense is based on the calculated fair value of the awards as measured at the grant date and is expensed ratably over the service period of the awards ( generally the vesting period ) . the fair value of retention awards is the stock price on the date of grant , while the fair value of stock options is determined by using the black-scholes option pricing model . we elected to use the modified prospective transition method as permitted by fas 123 ( r ) and did not restate financial results for prior periods . we did not make an adjustment for the cumulative effect of these estimated forfeitures , as the impact was not material . as a result of the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we recognized expense for stock options in 2006 , in addition to retention awards , which were expensed prior to 2006 . stock-based compensation expense for the year ended december 31 , 2006 was $ 22 million , after tax , or $ 0.08 per basic and diluted share . this includes $ 9 million for stock options and $ 13 million for retention awards for 2006 . before taxes , stock-based compensation expense included $ 14 million for stock options and $ 21 million for retention awards for 2006 . we recorded $ 29 million of excess tax benefits as an inflow of financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . prior to the adoption of fas 123 ( r ) , we applied the recognition and measurement principles of accounting principles board opinion no . 25 , accounting for stock issued to employees , and related interpretations . no stock- based employee compensation expense related to stock option grants was reflected in net income , as all options granted under those plans had a grant price equal to the market value of our common stock on the date of grant . stock-based compensation expense related to retention shares , stock units , and other incentive plans was reflected in net income . the following table details the effect on net income and earnings per share had compensation expense for all of our stock-based awards , including stock options , been recorded in the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 based on the fair value method under fasb statement no . 123 , accounting for stock-based compensation . pro forma stock-based compensation expense year ended december 31 , millions of dollars , except per share amounts 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>pro forma stock-based compensation expense</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>millions of dollars except per share amounts</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income as reported</td><td>$ 1026</td><td>$ 604</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>stock-based employee compensation expense reported in net income net of tax</td><td>13</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value 2013based method for allawards net of tax [a]</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>pro forma net income</td><td>$ 989</td><td>$ 582</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic as reported</td><td>$ 3.89</td><td>$ 2.33</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma</td><td>$ 3.75</td><td>$ 2.25</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted as reported</td><td>$ 3.85</td><td>$ 2.30</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>earnings per share 2013 diluted pro forma</td><td>$ 3.71</td><td>$ 2.22</td></tr></table> [a] stock options for executives granted in 2003 and 2002 included a reload feature . this reload feature allowed executives to exercise their options using shares of union pacific corporation common stock that they already owned and obtain a new grant of options in the amount of the shares used for exercise plus any shares withheld for tax purposes . the reload feature of these option grants could only be exercised if the .
Question: what was earnings per share 2013 basic pro forma in 2004?
Answer: 2.25
Question: what were earnings per share 2013 diluted pro forma in 2004?
Answer: 2.22
Question: what is the difference?
Answer: 0.03
Question: what was the eps 2013 basic pro forma?
Answer: 2.25
Question: what is the difference over that eps?
| 0.01333 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
through the certegy merger , the company has an obligation to service $ 200 million ( aggregate principal amount ) of unsecured 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) fixed-rate notes due in 2008 . the notes were recorded in purchase accounting at a discount of $ 5.7 million , which is being amortized over the term of the notes . the notes accrue interest at a rate of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) per year , payable semi-annually in arrears on each march 15 and september 15 . on april 11 , 2005 , fis entered into interest rate swap agreements which have effectively fixed the interest rate at approximately 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) through april 2008 on $ 350 million of the term loan facilities ( or its replacement debt ) and at approximately 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) through april 2007 on an additional $ 350 million of the term loan . the company has designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges in accordance with sfas no . 133 . the estimated fair value of the cash flow hedges results in an asset to the company of $ 4.9 million and $ 5.2 million , as of december 31 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively , which is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in other noncurrent assets and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes . a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is reclassified into interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on the term loan facilities . the company 2019s existing cash flow hedges are highly effective and there is no current impact on earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness . it is the policy of the company to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . principal maturities at december 31 , 2006 ( and at december 31 , 2006 after giving effect to the debt refinancing completed on january 18 , 2007 ) for the next five years and thereafter are as follows ( in thousands ) : december 31 , january 18 , 2007 refinancing . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 31 2006</td><td>january 18 2007 refinancing</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 61661</td><td>$ 96161</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>257541</td><td>282041</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>68129</td><td>145129</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>33586</td><td>215586</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>941875</td><td>165455</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1646709</td><td>2105129</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3009501</td><td>$ 3009501</td></tr></table> fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates consolidated and combined financial statements notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the fair value of cash flow hedges in 2006?
| 4.9 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
through the certegy merger , the company has an obligation to service $ 200 million ( aggregate principal amount ) of unsecured 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) fixed-rate notes due in 2008 . the notes were recorded in purchase accounting at a discount of $ 5.7 million , which is being amortized over the term of the notes . the notes accrue interest at a rate of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) per year , payable semi-annually in arrears on each march 15 and september 15 . on april 11 , 2005 , fis entered into interest rate swap agreements which have effectively fixed the interest rate at approximately 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) through april 2008 on $ 350 million of the term loan facilities ( or its replacement debt ) and at approximately 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) through april 2007 on an additional $ 350 million of the term loan . the company has designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges in accordance with sfas no . 133 . the estimated fair value of the cash flow hedges results in an asset to the company of $ 4.9 million and $ 5.2 million , as of december 31 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively , which is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in other noncurrent assets and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes . a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is reclassified into interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on the term loan facilities . the company 2019s existing cash flow hedges are highly effective and there is no current impact on earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness . it is the policy of the company to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . principal maturities at december 31 , 2006 ( and at december 31 , 2006 after giving effect to the debt refinancing completed on january 18 , 2007 ) for the next five years and thereafter are as follows ( in thousands ) : december 31 , january 18 , 2007 refinancing . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 31 2006</td><td>january 18 2007 refinancing</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 61661</td><td>$ 96161</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>257541</td><td>282041</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>68129</td><td>145129</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>33586</td><td>215586</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>941875</td><td>165455</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1646709</td><td>2105129</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3009501</td><td>$ 3009501</td></tr></table> fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates consolidated and combined financial statements notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the fair value of cash flow hedges in 2006?
Answer: 4.9
Question: what was the fair value of cash flow hedges in 2005?
| 5.2 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
through the certegy merger , the company has an obligation to service $ 200 million ( aggregate principal amount ) of unsecured 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) fixed-rate notes due in 2008 . the notes were recorded in purchase accounting at a discount of $ 5.7 million , which is being amortized over the term of the notes . the notes accrue interest at a rate of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) per year , payable semi-annually in arrears on each march 15 and september 15 . on april 11 , 2005 , fis entered into interest rate swap agreements which have effectively fixed the interest rate at approximately 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) through april 2008 on $ 350 million of the term loan facilities ( or its replacement debt ) and at approximately 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) through april 2007 on an additional $ 350 million of the term loan . the company has designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges in accordance with sfas no . 133 . the estimated fair value of the cash flow hedges results in an asset to the company of $ 4.9 million and $ 5.2 million , as of december 31 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively , which is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in other noncurrent assets and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes . a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is reclassified into interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on the term loan facilities . the company 2019s existing cash flow hedges are highly effective and there is no current impact on earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness . it is the policy of the company to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . principal maturities at december 31 , 2006 ( and at december 31 , 2006 after giving effect to the debt refinancing completed on january 18 , 2007 ) for the next five years and thereafter are as follows ( in thousands ) : december 31 , january 18 , 2007 refinancing . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 31 2006</td><td>january 18 2007 refinancing</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 61661</td><td>$ 96161</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>257541</td><td>282041</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>68129</td><td>145129</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>33586</td><td>215586</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>941875</td><td>165455</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1646709</td><td>2105129</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3009501</td><td>$ 3009501</td></tr></table> fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates consolidated and combined financial statements notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the fair value of cash flow hedges in 2006?
Answer: 4.9
Question: what was the fair value of cash flow hedges in 2005?
Answer: 5.2
Question: what is the net difference?
| -0.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
through the certegy merger , the company has an obligation to service $ 200 million ( aggregate principal amount ) of unsecured 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) fixed-rate notes due in 2008 . the notes were recorded in purchase accounting at a discount of $ 5.7 million , which is being amortized over the term of the notes . the notes accrue interest at a rate of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) per year , payable semi-annually in arrears on each march 15 and september 15 . on april 11 , 2005 , fis entered into interest rate swap agreements which have effectively fixed the interest rate at approximately 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) through april 2008 on $ 350 million of the term loan facilities ( or its replacement debt ) and at approximately 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) through april 2007 on an additional $ 350 million of the term loan . the company has designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges in accordance with sfas no . 133 . the estimated fair value of the cash flow hedges results in an asset to the company of $ 4.9 million and $ 5.2 million , as of december 31 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively , which is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in other noncurrent assets and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes . a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is reclassified into interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on the term loan facilities . the company 2019s existing cash flow hedges are highly effective and there is no current impact on earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness . it is the policy of the company to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . principal maturities at december 31 , 2006 ( and at december 31 , 2006 after giving effect to the debt refinancing completed on january 18 , 2007 ) for the next five years and thereafter are as follows ( in thousands ) : december 31 , january 18 , 2007 refinancing . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 31 2006</td><td>january 18 2007 refinancing</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 61661</td><td>$ 96161</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>257541</td><td>282041</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>68129</td><td>145129</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>33586</td><td>215586</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>941875</td><td>165455</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1646709</td><td>2105129</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total</td><td>$ 3009501</td><td>$ 3009501</td></tr></table> fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates consolidated and combined financial statements notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the fair value of cash flow hedges in 2006?
Answer: 4.9
Question: what was the fair value of cash flow hedges in 2005?
Answer: 5.2
Question: what is the net difference?
Answer: -0.3
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.05769 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
zimmer biomet holdings , inc . 2015 form 10-k annual report through february 25 , 2016 , we repurchased approximately $ 415.0 million of shares of our common stock , which includes the $ 250.0 million of shares that we repurchased from certain selling stockholders on february 10 , 2016 . in order to achieve operational synergies , we expect cash outlays related to our integration plans to be approximately $ 290.0 million in 2016 . these cash outlays are necessary to achieve our integration goals of net annual pre-tax operating profit synergies of $ 350.0 million by the end of the third year post-closing date . also as discussed in note 20 to our consolidated financial statements , as of december 31 , 2015 , a short-term liability of $ 50.0 million and long-term liability of $ 264.6 million related to durom cup product liability claims was recorded on our consolidated balance sheet . we expect to continue paying these claims over the next few years . we expect to be reimbursed a portion of these payments for product liability claims from insurance carriers . as of december 31 , 2015 , we have received a portion of the insurance proceeds we estimate we will recover . we have a long-term receivable of $ 95.3 million remaining for future expected reimbursements from our insurance carriers . we also had a short-term liability of $ 33.4 million related to biomet metal-on-metal hip implant claims . at december 31 , 2015 , we had ten tranches of senior notes outstanding as follows ( dollars in millions ) : principal interest rate maturity date . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>principal</td><td>interest rate</td><td>maturity date</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 500.0</td><td>1.450% ( 1.450 % )</td><td>april 1 2017</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1150.0</td><td>2.000</td><td>april 1 2018</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>500.0</td><td>4.625</td><td>november 30 2019</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>1500.0</td><td>2.700</td><td>april 1 2020</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>300.0</td><td>3.375</td><td>november 30 2021</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>750.0</td><td>3.150</td><td>april 1 2022</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2000.0</td><td>3.550</td><td>april 1 2025</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>500.0</td><td>4.250</td><td>august 15 2035</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>500.0</td><td>5.750</td><td>november 30 2039</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>1250.0</td><td>4.450</td><td>august 15 2045</td></tr></table> we issued $ 7.65 billion of senior notes in march 2015 ( the 201cmerger notes 201d ) , the proceeds of which were used to finance a portion of the cash consideration payable in the biomet merger , pay merger related fees and expenses and pay a portion of biomet 2019s funded debt . on june 24 , 2015 , we also borrowed $ 3.0 billion on a u.s . term loan ( 201cu.s . term loan 201d ) to fund the biomet merger . we may , at our option , redeem our senior notes , in whole or in part , at any time upon payment of the principal , any applicable make-whole premium , and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption . in addition , the merger notes and the 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) senior notes due 2021 may be redeemed at our option without any make-whole premium at specified dates ranging from one month to six months in advance of the scheduled maturity date . we have a $ 4.35 billion credit agreement ( 201ccredit agreement 201d ) that contains : ( i ) a 5-year unsecured u.s . term loan facility ( 201cu.s . term loan facility 201d ) in the principal amount of $ 3.0 billion , and ( ii ) a 5-year unsecured multicurrency revolving facility ( 201cmulticurrency revolving facility 201d ) in the principal amount of $ 1.35 billion . the multicurrency revolving facility will mature in may 2019 , with two one-year extensions available at our option . borrowings under the multicurrency revolving facility may be used for general corporate purposes . there were no borrowings outstanding under the multicurrency revolving facility as of december 31 , 2015 . the u.s . term loan facility will mature in june 2020 , with principal payments due beginning september 30 , 2015 , as follows : $ 75.0 million on a quarterly basis during the first three years , $ 112.5 million on a quarterly basis during the fourth year , and $ 412.5 million on a quarterly basis during the fifth year . in 2015 , we paid $ 500.0 million in principal under the u.s . term loan facility , resulting in $ 2.5 billion in outstanding borrowings as of december 31 , we and certain of our wholly owned foreign subsidiaries are the borrowers under the credit agreement . borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest at floating rates based upon indices determined by the currency of the borrowings plus an applicable margin determined by reference to our senior unsecured long-term credit rating , or at an alternate base rate , or , in the case of borrowings under the multicurrency revolving facility only , at a fixed rate determined through a competitive bid process . the credit agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default for an unsecured financing arrangement , including , among other things , limitations on consolidations , mergers and sales of assets . financial covenants include a consolidated indebtedness to consolidated ebitda ratio of no greater than 5.0 to 1.0 through june 24 , 2016 and no greater than 4.5 to 1.0 thereafter . if our credit rating falls below investment grade , additional restrictions would result , including restrictions on investments and payment of dividends . we were in compliance with all covenants under the credit agreement as of december 31 , 2015 . commitments under the credit agreement are subject to certain fees . on the multicurrency revolving facility , we pay a facility fee at a rate determined by reference to our senior unsecured long-term credit rating . we have a japan term loan agreement with one of the lenders under the credit agreement for 11.7 billion japanese yen that will mature on may 31 , 2018 . borrowings under the japan term loan bear interest at a fixed rate of 0.61 percent per annum until maturity . we also have other available uncommitted credit facilities totaling $ 35.8 million . we place our cash and cash equivalents in highly-rated financial institutions and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one entity . we invest only in high-quality financial instruments in accordance with our internal investment policy . as of december 31 , 2015 , we had short-term and long-term investments in debt securities with a fair value of $ 273.1 million . these investments are in debt securities of many different issuers and , therefore , we believe we have no significant concentration of risk with a single issuer . all of these debt securities remain highly rated and we believe the risk of default by the issuers is low. .
Question: what is 2.5 times 1000?
| 2500.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
zimmer biomet holdings , inc . 2015 form 10-k annual report through february 25 , 2016 , we repurchased approximately $ 415.0 million of shares of our common stock , which includes the $ 250.0 million of shares that we repurchased from certain selling stockholders on february 10 , 2016 . in order to achieve operational synergies , we expect cash outlays related to our integration plans to be approximately $ 290.0 million in 2016 . these cash outlays are necessary to achieve our integration goals of net annual pre-tax operating profit synergies of $ 350.0 million by the end of the third year post-closing date . also as discussed in note 20 to our consolidated financial statements , as of december 31 , 2015 , a short-term liability of $ 50.0 million and long-term liability of $ 264.6 million related to durom cup product liability claims was recorded on our consolidated balance sheet . we expect to continue paying these claims over the next few years . we expect to be reimbursed a portion of these payments for product liability claims from insurance carriers . as of december 31 , 2015 , we have received a portion of the insurance proceeds we estimate we will recover . we have a long-term receivable of $ 95.3 million remaining for future expected reimbursements from our insurance carriers . we also had a short-term liability of $ 33.4 million related to biomet metal-on-metal hip implant claims . at december 31 , 2015 , we had ten tranches of senior notes outstanding as follows ( dollars in millions ) : principal interest rate maturity date . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>principal</td><td>interest rate</td><td>maturity date</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 500.0</td><td>1.450% ( 1.450 % )</td><td>april 1 2017</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1150.0</td><td>2.000</td><td>april 1 2018</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>500.0</td><td>4.625</td><td>november 30 2019</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>1500.0</td><td>2.700</td><td>april 1 2020</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>300.0</td><td>3.375</td><td>november 30 2021</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>750.0</td><td>3.150</td><td>april 1 2022</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2000.0</td><td>3.550</td><td>april 1 2025</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>500.0</td><td>4.250</td><td>august 15 2035</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>500.0</td><td>5.750</td><td>november 30 2039</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>1250.0</td><td>4.450</td><td>august 15 2045</td></tr></table> we issued $ 7.65 billion of senior notes in march 2015 ( the 201cmerger notes 201d ) , the proceeds of which were used to finance a portion of the cash consideration payable in the biomet merger , pay merger related fees and expenses and pay a portion of biomet 2019s funded debt . on june 24 , 2015 , we also borrowed $ 3.0 billion on a u.s . term loan ( 201cu.s . term loan 201d ) to fund the biomet merger . we may , at our option , redeem our senior notes , in whole or in part , at any time upon payment of the principal , any applicable make-whole premium , and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption . in addition , the merger notes and the 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) senior notes due 2021 may be redeemed at our option without any make-whole premium at specified dates ranging from one month to six months in advance of the scheduled maturity date . we have a $ 4.35 billion credit agreement ( 201ccredit agreement 201d ) that contains : ( i ) a 5-year unsecured u.s . term loan facility ( 201cu.s . term loan facility 201d ) in the principal amount of $ 3.0 billion , and ( ii ) a 5-year unsecured multicurrency revolving facility ( 201cmulticurrency revolving facility 201d ) in the principal amount of $ 1.35 billion . the multicurrency revolving facility will mature in may 2019 , with two one-year extensions available at our option . borrowings under the multicurrency revolving facility may be used for general corporate purposes . there were no borrowings outstanding under the multicurrency revolving facility as of december 31 , 2015 . the u.s . term loan facility will mature in june 2020 , with principal payments due beginning september 30 , 2015 , as follows : $ 75.0 million on a quarterly basis during the first three years , $ 112.5 million on a quarterly basis during the fourth year , and $ 412.5 million on a quarterly basis during the fifth year . in 2015 , we paid $ 500.0 million in principal under the u.s . term loan facility , resulting in $ 2.5 billion in outstanding borrowings as of december 31 , we and certain of our wholly owned foreign subsidiaries are the borrowers under the credit agreement . borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest at floating rates based upon indices determined by the currency of the borrowings plus an applicable margin determined by reference to our senior unsecured long-term credit rating , or at an alternate base rate , or , in the case of borrowings under the multicurrency revolving facility only , at a fixed rate determined through a competitive bid process . the credit agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default for an unsecured financing arrangement , including , among other things , limitations on consolidations , mergers and sales of assets . financial covenants include a consolidated indebtedness to consolidated ebitda ratio of no greater than 5.0 to 1.0 through june 24 , 2016 and no greater than 4.5 to 1.0 thereafter . if our credit rating falls below investment grade , additional restrictions would result , including restrictions on investments and payment of dividends . we were in compliance with all covenants under the credit agreement as of december 31 , 2015 . commitments under the credit agreement are subject to certain fees . on the multicurrency revolving facility , we pay a facility fee at a rate determined by reference to our senior unsecured long-term credit rating . we have a japan term loan agreement with one of the lenders under the credit agreement for 11.7 billion japanese yen that will mature on may 31 , 2018 . borrowings under the japan term loan bear interest at a fixed rate of 0.61 percent per annum until maturity . we also have other available uncommitted credit facilities totaling $ 35.8 million . we place our cash and cash equivalents in highly-rated financial institutions and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one entity . we invest only in high-quality financial instruments in accordance with our internal investment policy . as of december 31 , 2015 , we had short-term and long-term investments in debt securities with a fair value of $ 273.1 million . these investments are in debt securities of many different issuers and , therefore , we believe we have no significant concentration of risk with a single issuer . all of these debt securities remain highly rated and we believe the risk of default by the issuers is low. .
Question: what is 2.5 times 1000?
Answer: 2500.0
Question: what was the amount of principal paid in 2015?
| 500.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
zimmer biomet holdings , inc . 2015 form 10-k annual report through february 25 , 2016 , we repurchased approximately $ 415.0 million of shares of our common stock , which includes the $ 250.0 million of shares that we repurchased from certain selling stockholders on february 10 , 2016 . in order to achieve operational synergies , we expect cash outlays related to our integration plans to be approximately $ 290.0 million in 2016 . these cash outlays are necessary to achieve our integration goals of net annual pre-tax operating profit synergies of $ 350.0 million by the end of the third year post-closing date . also as discussed in note 20 to our consolidated financial statements , as of december 31 , 2015 , a short-term liability of $ 50.0 million and long-term liability of $ 264.6 million related to durom cup product liability claims was recorded on our consolidated balance sheet . we expect to continue paying these claims over the next few years . we expect to be reimbursed a portion of these payments for product liability claims from insurance carriers . as of december 31 , 2015 , we have received a portion of the insurance proceeds we estimate we will recover . we have a long-term receivable of $ 95.3 million remaining for future expected reimbursements from our insurance carriers . we also had a short-term liability of $ 33.4 million related to biomet metal-on-metal hip implant claims . at december 31 , 2015 , we had ten tranches of senior notes outstanding as follows ( dollars in millions ) : principal interest rate maturity date . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>principal</td><td>interest rate</td><td>maturity date</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 500.0</td><td>1.450% ( 1.450 % )</td><td>april 1 2017</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1150.0</td><td>2.000</td><td>april 1 2018</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>500.0</td><td>4.625</td><td>november 30 2019</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>1500.0</td><td>2.700</td><td>april 1 2020</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>300.0</td><td>3.375</td><td>november 30 2021</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>750.0</td><td>3.150</td><td>april 1 2022</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2000.0</td><td>3.550</td><td>april 1 2025</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>500.0</td><td>4.250</td><td>august 15 2035</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>500.0</td><td>5.750</td><td>november 30 2039</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>1250.0</td><td>4.450</td><td>august 15 2045</td></tr></table> we issued $ 7.65 billion of senior notes in march 2015 ( the 201cmerger notes 201d ) , the proceeds of which were used to finance a portion of the cash consideration payable in the biomet merger , pay merger related fees and expenses and pay a portion of biomet 2019s funded debt . on june 24 , 2015 , we also borrowed $ 3.0 billion on a u.s . term loan ( 201cu.s . term loan 201d ) to fund the biomet merger . we may , at our option , redeem our senior notes , in whole or in part , at any time upon payment of the principal , any applicable make-whole premium , and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption . in addition , the merger notes and the 3.375% ( 3.375 % ) senior notes due 2021 may be redeemed at our option without any make-whole premium at specified dates ranging from one month to six months in advance of the scheduled maturity date . we have a $ 4.35 billion credit agreement ( 201ccredit agreement 201d ) that contains : ( i ) a 5-year unsecured u.s . term loan facility ( 201cu.s . term loan facility 201d ) in the principal amount of $ 3.0 billion , and ( ii ) a 5-year unsecured multicurrency revolving facility ( 201cmulticurrency revolving facility 201d ) in the principal amount of $ 1.35 billion . the multicurrency revolving facility will mature in may 2019 , with two one-year extensions available at our option . borrowings under the multicurrency revolving facility may be used for general corporate purposes . there were no borrowings outstanding under the multicurrency revolving facility as of december 31 , 2015 . the u.s . term loan facility will mature in june 2020 , with principal payments due beginning september 30 , 2015 , as follows : $ 75.0 million on a quarterly basis during the first three years , $ 112.5 million on a quarterly basis during the fourth year , and $ 412.5 million on a quarterly basis during the fifth year . in 2015 , we paid $ 500.0 million in principal under the u.s . term loan facility , resulting in $ 2.5 billion in outstanding borrowings as of december 31 , we and certain of our wholly owned foreign subsidiaries are the borrowers under the credit agreement . borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest at floating rates based upon indices determined by the currency of the borrowings plus an applicable margin determined by reference to our senior unsecured long-term credit rating , or at an alternate base rate , or , in the case of borrowings under the multicurrency revolving facility only , at a fixed rate determined through a competitive bid process . the credit agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default for an unsecured financing arrangement , including , among other things , limitations on consolidations , mergers and sales of assets . financial covenants include a consolidated indebtedness to consolidated ebitda ratio of no greater than 5.0 to 1.0 through june 24 , 2016 and no greater than 4.5 to 1.0 thereafter . if our credit rating falls below investment grade , additional restrictions would result , including restrictions on investments and payment of dividends . we were in compliance with all covenants under the credit agreement as of december 31 , 2015 . commitments under the credit agreement are subject to certain fees . on the multicurrency revolving facility , we pay a facility fee at a rate determined by reference to our senior unsecured long-term credit rating . we have a japan term loan agreement with one of the lenders under the credit agreement for 11.7 billion japanese yen that will mature on may 31 , 2018 . borrowings under the japan term loan bear interest at a fixed rate of 0.61 percent per annum until maturity . we also have other available uncommitted credit facilities totaling $ 35.8 million . we place our cash and cash equivalents in highly-rated financial institutions and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one entity . we invest only in high-quality financial instruments in accordance with our internal investment policy . as of december 31 , 2015 , we had short-term and long-term investments in debt securities with a fair value of $ 273.1 million . these investments are in debt securities of many different issuers and , therefore , we believe we have no significant concentration of risk with a single issuer . all of these debt securities remain highly rated and we believe the risk of default by the issuers is low. .
Question: what is 2.5 times 1000?
Answer: 2500.0
Question: what was the amount of principal paid in 2015?
Answer: 500.0
Question: what is the ratio of principal paid to outstanding borrowings?
| 0.2 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes receivable in 2014 , we entered into a $ 3.0 million promissory note with a privately held company which was recorded at cost . the interest rate on the promissory note is 8.0% ( 8.0 % ) per annum and is payable quarterly . all unpaid principal and accrued interest on the promissory note is due and payable on the earlier of august 26 , 2017 , or upon default . 5 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we lease various operating spaces in north america , europe , asia and australia under non-cancelable operating lease arrangements that expire on various dates through 2024 . these arrangements require us to pay certain operating expenses , such as taxes , repairs , and insurance and contain renewal and escalation clauses . we recognize rent expense under these arrangements on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease . as of december 31 , 2015 , the aggregate future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases consist of the following ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 6306</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>6678</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>6260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>5809</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>5580</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>21450</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum future lease payments</td><td>$ 52083</td></tr></table> rent expense for all operating leases amounted to $ 6.7 million , $ 3.3 million and $ 3.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . financing obligation 2014build-to-suit lease in august 2012 , we executed a lease for a building then under construction in santa clara , california to serve as our headquarters . the lease term is 120 months and commenced in august 2013 . based on the terms of the lease agreement and due to our involvement in certain aspects of the construction such as our financial involvement in structural elements of asset construction , making decisions related to tenant improvement costs and purchasing insurance not reimbursable by the buyer-lessor ( the landlord ) , we were deemed the owner of the building ( for accounting purposes only ) during the construction period . we continue to maintain involvement in the property post construction completion and lack transferability of the risks and rewards of ownership , due to our required maintenance of a $ 4.0 million letter of credit , in addition to our ability and option to sublease our portion of the leased building for fees substantially higher than our base rate . due to our continued involvement in the property and lack of transferability of related risks and rewards of ownership to the landlord post construction , we account for the building and related improvements as a lease financing obligation . accordingly , as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we have recorded assets of $ 53.4 million , representing the total costs of the building and improvements incurred , including the costs paid by the lessor ( the legal owner of the building ) and additional improvement costs paid by us , and a corresponding financing obligation of $ 42.5 million and $ 43.6 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 1.3 million and $ 41.2 million were recorded as short-term and long-term financing obligations , respectively . land lease expense under our lease financing obligation included in rent expense above , amounted to $ 1.3 million and $ 1.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . there was no land lease expense for the year ended december 31 , 2013. .
Question: what was the minimum payment for operating leases in 2016, converted to single digits?
| 6.306 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes receivable in 2014 , we entered into a $ 3.0 million promissory note with a privately held company which was recorded at cost . the interest rate on the promissory note is 8.0% ( 8.0 % ) per annum and is payable quarterly . all unpaid principal and accrued interest on the promissory note is due and payable on the earlier of august 26 , 2017 , or upon default . 5 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we lease various operating spaces in north america , europe , asia and australia under non-cancelable operating lease arrangements that expire on various dates through 2024 . these arrangements require us to pay certain operating expenses , such as taxes , repairs , and insurance and contain renewal and escalation clauses . we recognize rent expense under these arrangements on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease . as of december 31 , 2015 , the aggregate future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases consist of the following ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 6306</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>6678</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>6260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>5809</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>5580</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>21450</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum future lease payments</td><td>$ 52083</td></tr></table> rent expense for all operating leases amounted to $ 6.7 million , $ 3.3 million and $ 3.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . financing obligation 2014build-to-suit lease in august 2012 , we executed a lease for a building then under construction in santa clara , california to serve as our headquarters . the lease term is 120 months and commenced in august 2013 . based on the terms of the lease agreement and due to our involvement in certain aspects of the construction such as our financial involvement in structural elements of asset construction , making decisions related to tenant improvement costs and purchasing insurance not reimbursable by the buyer-lessor ( the landlord ) , we were deemed the owner of the building ( for accounting purposes only ) during the construction period . we continue to maintain involvement in the property post construction completion and lack transferability of the risks and rewards of ownership , due to our required maintenance of a $ 4.0 million letter of credit , in addition to our ability and option to sublease our portion of the leased building for fees substantially higher than our base rate . due to our continued involvement in the property and lack of transferability of related risks and rewards of ownership to the landlord post construction , we account for the building and related improvements as a lease financing obligation . accordingly , as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we have recorded assets of $ 53.4 million , representing the total costs of the building and improvements incurred , including the costs paid by the lessor ( the legal owner of the building ) and additional improvement costs paid by us , and a corresponding financing obligation of $ 42.5 million and $ 43.6 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 1.3 million and $ 41.2 million were recorded as short-term and long-term financing obligations , respectively . land lease expense under our lease financing obligation included in rent expense above , amounted to $ 1.3 million and $ 1.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . there was no land lease expense for the year ended december 31 , 2013. .
Question: what was the minimum payment for operating leases in 2016, converted to single digits?
Answer: 6.306
Question: and the difference between this value and the rent expense for all operating leases in 2015?
| -0.394 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes receivable in 2014 , we entered into a $ 3.0 million promissory note with a privately held company which was recorded at cost . the interest rate on the promissory note is 8.0% ( 8.0 % ) per annum and is payable quarterly . all unpaid principal and accrued interest on the promissory note is due and payable on the earlier of august 26 , 2017 , or upon default . 5 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we lease various operating spaces in north america , europe , asia and australia under non-cancelable operating lease arrangements that expire on various dates through 2024 . these arrangements require us to pay certain operating expenses , such as taxes , repairs , and insurance and contain renewal and escalation clauses . we recognize rent expense under these arrangements on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease . as of december 31 , 2015 , the aggregate future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases consist of the following ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 6306</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>6678</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>6260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>5809</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>5580</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>21450</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum future lease payments</td><td>$ 52083</td></tr></table> rent expense for all operating leases amounted to $ 6.7 million , $ 3.3 million and $ 3.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . financing obligation 2014build-to-suit lease in august 2012 , we executed a lease for a building then under construction in santa clara , california to serve as our headquarters . the lease term is 120 months and commenced in august 2013 . based on the terms of the lease agreement and due to our involvement in certain aspects of the construction such as our financial involvement in structural elements of asset construction , making decisions related to tenant improvement costs and purchasing insurance not reimbursable by the buyer-lessor ( the landlord ) , we were deemed the owner of the building ( for accounting purposes only ) during the construction period . we continue to maintain involvement in the property post construction completion and lack transferability of the risks and rewards of ownership , due to our required maintenance of a $ 4.0 million letter of credit , in addition to our ability and option to sublease our portion of the leased building for fees substantially higher than our base rate . due to our continued involvement in the property and lack of transferability of related risks and rewards of ownership to the landlord post construction , we account for the building and related improvements as a lease financing obligation . accordingly , as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we have recorded assets of $ 53.4 million , representing the total costs of the building and improvements incurred , including the costs paid by the lessor ( the legal owner of the building ) and additional improvement costs paid by us , and a corresponding financing obligation of $ 42.5 million and $ 43.6 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 1.3 million and $ 41.2 million were recorded as short-term and long-term financing obligations , respectively . land lease expense under our lease financing obligation included in rent expense above , amounted to $ 1.3 million and $ 1.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . there was no land lease expense for the year ended december 31 , 2013. .
Question: what was the minimum payment for operating leases in 2016, converted to single digits?
Answer: 6.306
Question: and the difference between this value and the rent expense for all operating leases in 2015?
Answer: -0.394
Question: and the value for 2015 specifically?
| 6.7 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes receivable in 2014 , we entered into a $ 3.0 million promissory note with a privately held company which was recorded at cost . the interest rate on the promissory note is 8.0% ( 8.0 % ) per annum and is payable quarterly . all unpaid principal and accrued interest on the promissory note is due and payable on the earlier of august 26 , 2017 , or upon default . 5 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we lease various operating spaces in north america , europe , asia and australia under non-cancelable operating lease arrangements that expire on various dates through 2024 . these arrangements require us to pay certain operating expenses , such as taxes , repairs , and insurance and contain renewal and escalation clauses . we recognize rent expense under these arrangements on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease . as of december 31 , 2015 , the aggregate future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases consist of the following ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 6306</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>6678</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>6260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>5809</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>5580</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>21450</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum future lease payments</td><td>$ 52083</td></tr></table> rent expense for all operating leases amounted to $ 6.7 million , $ 3.3 million and $ 3.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . financing obligation 2014build-to-suit lease in august 2012 , we executed a lease for a building then under construction in santa clara , california to serve as our headquarters . the lease term is 120 months and commenced in august 2013 . based on the terms of the lease agreement and due to our involvement in certain aspects of the construction such as our financial involvement in structural elements of asset construction , making decisions related to tenant improvement costs and purchasing insurance not reimbursable by the buyer-lessor ( the landlord ) , we were deemed the owner of the building ( for accounting purposes only ) during the construction period . we continue to maintain involvement in the property post construction completion and lack transferability of the risks and rewards of ownership , due to our required maintenance of a $ 4.0 million letter of credit , in addition to our ability and option to sublease our portion of the leased building for fees substantially higher than our base rate . due to our continued involvement in the property and lack of transferability of related risks and rewards of ownership to the landlord post construction , we account for the building and related improvements as a lease financing obligation . accordingly , as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we have recorded assets of $ 53.4 million , representing the total costs of the building and improvements incurred , including the costs paid by the lessor ( the legal owner of the building ) and additional improvement costs paid by us , and a corresponding financing obligation of $ 42.5 million and $ 43.6 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 1.3 million and $ 41.2 million were recorded as short-term and long-term financing obligations , respectively . land lease expense under our lease financing obligation included in rent expense above , amounted to $ 1.3 million and $ 1.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . there was no land lease expense for the year ended december 31 , 2013. .
Question: what was the minimum payment for operating leases in 2016, converted to single digits?
Answer: 6.306
Question: and the difference between this value and the rent expense for all operating leases in 2015?
Answer: -0.394
Question: and the value for 2015 specifically?
Answer: 6.7
Question: so what is the growth rate during this period?
| -0.05881 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
available information . the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8- k , proxy statements and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestregroup.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector during the fourth quarter of 2014 . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . subsequent to april 1 , 2010 , we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 10.0 million , before corporate level reinsurance and taxes . prior to april 1 , 2010 , we used a threshold of $ 5.0 million . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 62.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>195.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>410.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1300.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2010</td><td>571.1</td></tr></table> our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .
Question: what is the sum of accumulated pre-tax catastrophe loss in 2010 and 2011?
| 1871.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
available information . the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8- k , proxy statements and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestregroup.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector during the fourth quarter of 2014 . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . subsequent to april 1 , 2010 , we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 10.0 million , before corporate level reinsurance and taxes . prior to april 1 , 2010 , we used a threshold of $ 5.0 million . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 62.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>195.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>410.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1300.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2010</td><td>571.1</td></tr></table> our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .
Question: what is the sum of accumulated pre-tax catastrophe loss in 2010 and 2011?
Answer: 1871.5
Question: what is the sum including 2012?
| 2281.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
available information . the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8- k , proxy statements and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestregroup.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector during the fourth quarter of 2014 . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . subsequent to april 1 , 2010 , we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 10.0 million , before corporate level reinsurance and taxes . prior to april 1 , 2010 , we used a threshold of $ 5.0 million . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 62.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>195.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>410.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1300.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2010</td><td>571.1</td></tr></table> our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .
Question: what is the sum of accumulated pre-tax catastrophe loss in 2010 and 2011?
Answer: 1871.5
Question: what is the sum including 2012?
Answer: 2281.5
Question: what is the sum of accumulated pre-tax catastrophe loss in 2013?
| 195.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
available information . the company 2019s annual reports on form 10-k , quarterly reports on form 10-q , current reports on form 8- k , proxy statements and amendments to those reports are available free of charge through the company 2019s internet website at http://www.everestregroup.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the securities and exchange commission ( the 201csec 201d ) . item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector during the fourth quarter of 2014 . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . subsequent to april 1 , 2010 , we define a catastrophe as an event that causes a loss on property exposures before reinsurance of at least $ 10.0 million , before corporate level reinsurance and taxes . prior to april 1 , 2010 , we used a threshold of $ 5.0 million . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calendar year:</td><td>pre-tax catastrophe losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( dollars in millions )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 62.2</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2013</td><td>195.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2012</td><td>410.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1300.4</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2010</td><td>571.1</td></tr></table> our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .
Question: what is the sum of accumulated pre-tax catastrophe loss in 2010 and 2011?
Answer: 1871.5
Question: what is the sum including 2012?
Answer: 2281.5
Question: what is the sum of accumulated pre-tax catastrophe loss in 2013?
Answer: 195.0
Question: what is the total sum?
| 2476.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
million excluding a gain on a bargain purchase price adjustment on the acquisition of a majority share of our operations in turkey and restructuring costs ) compared with $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) in 2012 and $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our then joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 . sales volumes in 2013 were higher than in 2012 reflecting strong demand for packaging in the agricultural markets in morocco and turkey . in europe , sales volumes decreased slightly due to continuing weak demand for packaging in the industrial markets , and lower demand for packaging in the agricultural markets resulting from poor weather conditions . average sales margins were significantly lower due to input costs for containerboard rising ahead of box sales price increases . other input costs were also higher , primarily for energy . operating profits in 2013 and 2012 included net gains of $ 13 million and $ 10 million , respectively , for insurance settlements and italian government grants , partially offset by additional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may 2012 which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly reflecting higher demand for packaging in the industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to gradually improve as a result of slight reductions in material costs and planned box price increases . other input costs should be about flat . brazilian industrial packaging includes the results of orsa international paper embalagens s.a. , a corrugated packaging producer in which international paper acquired a 75% ( 75 % ) share in january 2013 . net sales were $ 335 million in 2013 . operating profits in 2013 were a loss of $ 2 million ( a gain of $ 2 million excluding acquisition and integration costs ) . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower than in the fourth quarter of 2013 . average sales margins should improve reflecting the partial implementation of an announced sales price increase and a more favorable product mix . operating costs and input costs are expected to be lower . asian industrial packaging net sales were $ 400 million in 2013 compared with $ 400 million in 2012 and $ 410 million in 2011 . operating profits for the packaging operations were a loss of $ 5 million in 2013 ( a loss of $ 1 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with gains of $ 2 million in 2012 and $ 2 million in 2011 . operating profits were favorably impacted in 2013 by higher average sales margins and slightly higher sales volumes compared with 2012 , but these benefits were offset by higher operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to be seasonally soft . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 285 million in 2013 compared with $ 260 million in 2012 and $ 285 million in 2011 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 . printing papers demand for printing papers products is closely correlated with changes in commercial printing and advertising activity , direct mail volumes and , for uncoated cut-size products , with changes in white- collar employment levels that affect the usage of copy and laser printer paper . pulp is further affected by changes in currency rates that can enhance or disadvantage producers in different geographic regions . principal cost drivers include manufacturing efficiency , raw material and energy costs and freight costs . printing papers net sales for 2013 were about flat with both 2012 and 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were 55% ( 55 % ) lower than in 2012 and 69% ( 69 % ) lower than in 2011 . excluding facility closure costs and impairment costs , operating profits in 2013 were 15% ( 15 % ) lower than in 2012 and 40% ( 40 % ) lower than in 2011 . benefits from lower operating costs ( $ 81 million ) and lower maintenance outage costs ( $ 17 million ) were more than offset by lower average sales price realizations ( $ 38 million ) , lower sales volumes ( $ 14 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 99 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 34 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2013 included costs of $ 118 million associated with the announced closure of our courtland , alabama mill . during 2013 , the company accelerated depreciation for certain courtland assets , and diligently evaluated certain other assets for possible alternative uses by one of our other businesses . the net book value of these assets at december 31 , 2013 was approximately $ 470 million . during 2014 , we have continued our evaluation and expect to conclude as to any uses for these assets during the first quarter of 2014 . operating profits also included a $ 123 million impairment charge associated with goodwill and a trade name intangible asset in our india papers business . operating profits in 2011 included a $ 24 million gain related to the announced repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill to produce fluff pulp and an $ 11 million impairment charge related to our inverurie , scotland mill that was closed in 2009 . printing papers . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6205</td><td>$ 6230</td><td>$ 6215</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>271</td><td>599</td><td>872</td></tr></table> north american printing papers net sales were $ 2.6 billion in 2013 , $ 2.7 billion in 2012 and $ 2.8 billion in 2011. .
Question: what is the net sales of printing papers in north american in 2013, in billions?
| 2.6 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
million excluding a gain on a bargain purchase price adjustment on the acquisition of a majority share of our operations in turkey and restructuring costs ) compared with $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) in 2012 and $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our then joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 . sales volumes in 2013 were higher than in 2012 reflecting strong demand for packaging in the agricultural markets in morocco and turkey . in europe , sales volumes decreased slightly due to continuing weak demand for packaging in the industrial markets , and lower demand for packaging in the agricultural markets resulting from poor weather conditions . average sales margins were significantly lower due to input costs for containerboard rising ahead of box sales price increases . other input costs were also higher , primarily for energy . operating profits in 2013 and 2012 included net gains of $ 13 million and $ 10 million , respectively , for insurance settlements and italian government grants , partially offset by additional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may 2012 which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly reflecting higher demand for packaging in the industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to gradually improve as a result of slight reductions in material costs and planned box price increases . other input costs should be about flat . brazilian industrial packaging includes the results of orsa international paper embalagens s.a. , a corrugated packaging producer in which international paper acquired a 75% ( 75 % ) share in january 2013 . net sales were $ 335 million in 2013 . operating profits in 2013 were a loss of $ 2 million ( a gain of $ 2 million excluding acquisition and integration costs ) . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower than in the fourth quarter of 2013 . average sales margins should improve reflecting the partial implementation of an announced sales price increase and a more favorable product mix . operating costs and input costs are expected to be lower . asian industrial packaging net sales were $ 400 million in 2013 compared with $ 400 million in 2012 and $ 410 million in 2011 . operating profits for the packaging operations were a loss of $ 5 million in 2013 ( a loss of $ 1 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with gains of $ 2 million in 2012 and $ 2 million in 2011 . operating profits were favorably impacted in 2013 by higher average sales margins and slightly higher sales volumes compared with 2012 , but these benefits were offset by higher operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to be seasonally soft . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 285 million in 2013 compared with $ 260 million in 2012 and $ 285 million in 2011 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 . printing papers demand for printing papers products is closely correlated with changes in commercial printing and advertising activity , direct mail volumes and , for uncoated cut-size products , with changes in white- collar employment levels that affect the usage of copy and laser printer paper . pulp is further affected by changes in currency rates that can enhance or disadvantage producers in different geographic regions . principal cost drivers include manufacturing efficiency , raw material and energy costs and freight costs . printing papers net sales for 2013 were about flat with both 2012 and 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were 55% ( 55 % ) lower than in 2012 and 69% ( 69 % ) lower than in 2011 . excluding facility closure costs and impairment costs , operating profits in 2013 were 15% ( 15 % ) lower than in 2012 and 40% ( 40 % ) lower than in 2011 . benefits from lower operating costs ( $ 81 million ) and lower maintenance outage costs ( $ 17 million ) were more than offset by lower average sales price realizations ( $ 38 million ) , lower sales volumes ( $ 14 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 99 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 34 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2013 included costs of $ 118 million associated with the announced closure of our courtland , alabama mill . during 2013 , the company accelerated depreciation for certain courtland assets , and diligently evaluated certain other assets for possible alternative uses by one of our other businesses . the net book value of these assets at december 31 , 2013 was approximately $ 470 million . during 2014 , we have continued our evaluation and expect to conclude as to any uses for these assets during the first quarter of 2014 . operating profits also included a $ 123 million impairment charge associated with goodwill and a trade name intangible asset in our india papers business . operating profits in 2011 included a $ 24 million gain related to the announced repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill to produce fluff pulp and an $ 11 million impairment charge related to our inverurie , scotland mill that was closed in 2009 . printing papers . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6205</td><td>$ 6230</td><td>$ 6215</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>271</td><td>599</td><td>872</td></tr></table> north american printing papers net sales were $ 2.6 billion in 2013 , $ 2.7 billion in 2012 and $ 2.8 billion in 2011. .
Question: what is the net sales of printing papers in north american in 2013, in billions?
Answer: 2.6
Question: what about in millions?
| 2600.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
million excluding a gain on a bargain purchase price adjustment on the acquisition of a majority share of our operations in turkey and restructuring costs ) compared with $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) in 2012 and $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our then joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 . sales volumes in 2013 were higher than in 2012 reflecting strong demand for packaging in the agricultural markets in morocco and turkey . in europe , sales volumes decreased slightly due to continuing weak demand for packaging in the industrial markets , and lower demand for packaging in the agricultural markets resulting from poor weather conditions . average sales margins were significantly lower due to input costs for containerboard rising ahead of box sales price increases . other input costs were also higher , primarily for energy . operating profits in 2013 and 2012 included net gains of $ 13 million and $ 10 million , respectively , for insurance settlements and italian government grants , partially offset by additional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may 2012 which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly reflecting higher demand for packaging in the industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to gradually improve as a result of slight reductions in material costs and planned box price increases . other input costs should be about flat . brazilian industrial packaging includes the results of orsa international paper embalagens s.a. , a corrugated packaging producer in which international paper acquired a 75% ( 75 % ) share in january 2013 . net sales were $ 335 million in 2013 . operating profits in 2013 were a loss of $ 2 million ( a gain of $ 2 million excluding acquisition and integration costs ) . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower than in the fourth quarter of 2013 . average sales margins should improve reflecting the partial implementation of an announced sales price increase and a more favorable product mix . operating costs and input costs are expected to be lower . asian industrial packaging net sales were $ 400 million in 2013 compared with $ 400 million in 2012 and $ 410 million in 2011 . operating profits for the packaging operations were a loss of $ 5 million in 2013 ( a loss of $ 1 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with gains of $ 2 million in 2012 and $ 2 million in 2011 . operating profits were favorably impacted in 2013 by higher average sales margins and slightly higher sales volumes compared with 2012 , but these benefits were offset by higher operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to be seasonally soft . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 285 million in 2013 compared with $ 260 million in 2012 and $ 285 million in 2011 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 . printing papers demand for printing papers products is closely correlated with changes in commercial printing and advertising activity , direct mail volumes and , for uncoated cut-size products , with changes in white- collar employment levels that affect the usage of copy and laser printer paper . pulp is further affected by changes in currency rates that can enhance or disadvantage producers in different geographic regions . principal cost drivers include manufacturing efficiency , raw material and energy costs and freight costs . printing papers net sales for 2013 were about flat with both 2012 and 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were 55% ( 55 % ) lower than in 2012 and 69% ( 69 % ) lower than in 2011 . excluding facility closure costs and impairment costs , operating profits in 2013 were 15% ( 15 % ) lower than in 2012 and 40% ( 40 % ) lower than in 2011 . benefits from lower operating costs ( $ 81 million ) and lower maintenance outage costs ( $ 17 million ) were more than offset by lower average sales price realizations ( $ 38 million ) , lower sales volumes ( $ 14 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 99 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 34 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2013 included costs of $ 118 million associated with the announced closure of our courtland , alabama mill . during 2013 , the company accelerated depreciation for certain courtland assets , and diligently evaluated certain other assets for possible alternative uses by one of our other businesses . the net book value of these assets at december 31 , 2013 was approximately $ 470 million . during 2014 , we have continued our evaluation and expect to conclude as to any uses for these assets during the first quarter of 2014 . operating profits also included a $ 123 million impairment charge associated with goodwill and a trade name intangible asset in our india papers business . operating profits in 2011 included a $ 24 million gain related to the announced repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill to produce fluff pulp and an $ 11 million impairment charge related to our inverurie , scotland mill that was closed in 2009 . printing papers . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6205</td><td>$ 6230</td><td>$ 6215</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>271</td><td>599</td><td>872</td></tr></table> north american printing papers net sales were $ 2.6 billion in 2013 , $ 2.7 billion in 2012 and $ 2.8 billion in 2011. .
Question: what is the net sales of printing papers in north american in 2013, in billions?
Answer: 2.6
Question: what about in millions?
Answer: 2600.0
Question: what is the total sales in 2013?
| 6205.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
million excluding a gain on a bargain purchase price adjustment on the acquisition of a majority share of our operations in turkey and restructuring costs ) compared with $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) in 2012 and $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our then joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 . sales volumes in 2013 were higher than in 2012 reflecting strong demand for packaging in the agricultural markets in morocco and turkey . in europe , sales volumes decreased slightly due to continuing weak demand for packaging in the industrial markets , and lower demand for packaging in the agricultural markets resulting from poor weather conditions . average sales margins were significantly lower due to input costs for containerboard rising ahead of box sales price increases . other input costs were also higher , primarily for energy . operating profits in 2013 and 2012 included net gains of $ 13 million and $ 10 million , respectively , for insurance settlements and italian government grants , partially offset by additional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may 2012 which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly reflecting higher demand for packaging in the industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to gradually improve as a result of slight reductions in material costs and planned box price increases . other input costs should be about flat . brazilian industrial packaging includes the results of orsa international paper embalagens s.a. , a corrugated packaging producer in which international paper acquired a 75% ( 75 % ) share in january 2013 . net sales were $ 335 million in 2013 . operating profits in 2013 were a loss of $ 2 million ( a gain of $ 2 million excluding acquisition and integration costs ) . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower than in the fourth quarter of 2013 . average sales margins should improve reflecting the partial implementation of an announced sales price increase and a more favorable product mix . operating costs and input costs are expected to be lower . asian industrial packaging net sales were $ 400 million in 2013 compared with $ 400 million in 2012 and $ 410 million in 2011 . operating profits for the packaging operations were a loss of $ 5 million in 2013 ( a loss of $ 1 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with gains of $ 2 million in 2012 and $ 2 million in 2011 . operating profits were favorably impacted in 2013 by higher average sales margins and slightly higher sales volumes compared with 2012 , but these benefits were offset by higher operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to be seasonally soft . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 285 million in 2013 compared with $ 260 million in 2012 and $ 285 million in 2011 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 . printing papers demand for printing papers products is closely correlated with changes in commercial printing and advertising activity , direct mail volumes and , for uncoated cut-size products , with changes in white- collar employment levels that affect the usage of copy and laser printer paper . pulp is further affected by changes in currency rates that can enhance or disadvantage producers in different geographic regions . principal cost drivers include manufacturing efficiency , raw material and energy costs and freight costs . printing papers net sales for 2013 were about flat with both 2012 and 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were 55% ( 55 % ) lower than in 2012 and 69% ( 69 % ) lower than in 2011 . excluding facility closure costs and impairment costs , operating profits in 2013 were 15% ( 15 % ) lower than in 2012 and 40% ( 40 % ) lower than in 2011 . benefits from lower operating costs ( $ 81 million ) and lower maintenance outage costs ( $ 17 million ) were more than offset by lower average sales price realizations ( $ 38 million ) , lower sales volumes ( $ 14 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 99 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 34 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2013 included costs of $ 118 million associated with the announced closure of our courtland , alabama mill . during 2013 , the company accelerated depreciation for certain courtland assets , and diligently evaluated certain other assets for possible alternative uses by one of our other businesses . the net book value of these assets at december 31 , 2013 was approximately $ 470 million . during 2014 , we have continued our evaluation and expect to conclude as to any uses for these assets during the first quarter of 2014 . operating profits also included a $ 123 million impairment charge associated with goodwill and a trade name intangible asset in our india papers business . operating profits in 2011 included a $ 24 million gain related to the announced repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill to produce fluff pulp and an $ 11 million impairment charge related to our inverurie , scotland mill that was closed in 2009 . printing papers . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6205</td><td>$ 6230</td><td>$ 6215</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>271</td><td>599</td><td>872</td></tr></table> north american printing papers net sales were $ 2.6 billion in 2013 , $ 2.7 billion in 2012 and $ 2.8 billion in 2011. .
Question: what is the net sales of printing papers in north american in 2013, in billions?
Answer: 2.6
Question: what about in millions?
Answer: 2600.0
Question: what is the total sales in 2013?
Answer: 6205.0
Question: what portion does north america represent?
| 0.41902 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements competitive environment and general economic and business conditions , among other factors . pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the spanish , portu- guese and latin american markets and although pullmantur has diversified its passenger sourcing over the past few years , spain still represents pullmantur 2019s largest market . as previously disclosed , during 2012 european economies continued to demonstrate insta- bility in light of heightened concerns over sovereign debt issues as well as the impact of proposed auster- ity measures on certain markets . the spanish econ- omy was more severely impacted than many other economies and there is significant uncertainty as to when it will recover . in addition , the impact of the costa concordia incident has had a more lingering effect than expected and the impact in future years is uncertain . these factors were identified in the past as significant risks which could lead to the impairment of pullmantur 2019s goodwill . more recently , the spanish economy has progressively worsened and forecasts suggest the challenging operating environment will continue for an extended period of time . the unemployment rate in spain reached 26% ( 26 % ) during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is expected to rise further in 2013 . the international monetary fund , which had projected gdp growth of 1.8% ( 1.8 % ) a year ago , revised its 2013 gdp projections downward for spain to a contraction of 1.3% ( 1.3 % ) during the fourth quarter of 2012 and further reduced it to a contraction of 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) in january of 2013 . during the latter half of 2012 new austerity measures , such as increases to the value added tax , cuts to benefits , the phasing out of exemptions and the suspension of government bonuses , were implemented by the spanish government . we believe these austerity measures are having a larger impact on consumer confidence and discretionary spending than previously anticipated . as a result , there has been a significant deterioration in bookings from guests sourced from spain during the 2013 wave season . the combination of all of these factors has caused us to negatively adjust our cash flow projections , especially our closer-in net yield assumptions and the expectations regarding future capacity growth for the brand . based on our updated cash flow projections , we determined the implied fair value of goodwill for the pullmantur reporting unit was $ 145.5 million and rec- ognized an impairment charge of $ 319.2 million . this impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impairment of pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . there have been no goodwill impairment charges related to the pullmantur reporting unit in prior periods . see note 13 . fair value measurements and derivative instruments for further discussion . if the spanish economy weakens further or recovers more slowly than contemplated or if the economies of other markets ( e.g . france , brazil , latin america ) perform worse than contemplated in our discounted cash flow model , or if there are material changes to the projected future cash flows used in the impair- ment analyses , especially in net yields , an additional impairment charge of the pullmantur reporting unit 2019s goodwill may be required . note 4 . intangible assets intangible assets are reported in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and consist of the follow- ing ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indefinite-life intangible asset 2014pullmantur trademarks and trade names</td><td>$ 218883</td><td>$ 225679</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>impairment charge</td><td>-17356 ( 17356 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>3339</td><td>-6796 ( 6796 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 204866</td><td>$ 218883</td></tr></table> during the fourth quarter of 2012 , we performed the annual impairment review of our trademarks and trade names using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method . the royalty rate used is based on comparable royalty agreements in the tourism and hospitality industry . these trademarks and trade names relate to pullmantur and we have used a discount rate comparable to the rate used in valuing the pullmantur reporting unit in our goodwill impairment test . as described in note 3 . goodwill , the continued deterioration of the spanish economy caused us to negatively adjust our cash flow projections for the pullmantur reporting unit , especially our closer-in net yield assumptions and the timing of future capacity growth for the brand . based on our updated cash flow projections , we determined that the fair value of pullmantur 2019s trademarks and trade names no longer exceeded their carrying value . accordingly , we recog- nized an impairment charge of approximately $ 17.4 million to write down trademarks and trade names to their fair value of $ 204.9 million . this impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impairment of pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . see note 13 . fair value measurements and derivative instruments for further discussion . if the spanish economy weakens further or recovers more slowly than contemplated or if the economies of other markets ( e.g . france , brazil , latin america ) 0494.indd 76 3/27/13 12:53 pm .
Question: what was the change in the value of intangible assets from 2011 to 2012?
| -14017.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements competitive environment and general economic and business conditions , among other factors . pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the spanish , portu- guese and latin american markets and although pullmantur has diversified its passenger sourcing over the past few years , spain still represents pullmantur 2019s largest market . as previously disclosed , during 2012 european economies continued to demonstrate insta- bility in light of heightened concerns over sovereign debt issues as well as the impact of proposed auster- ity measures on certain markets . the spanish econ- omy was more severely impacted than many other economies and there is significant uncertainty as to when it will recover . in addition , the impact of the costa concordia incident has had a more lingering effect than expected and the impact in future years is uncertain . these factors were identified in the past as significant risks which could lead to the impairment of pullmantur 2019s goodwill . more recently , the spanish economy has progressively worsened and forecasts suggest the challenging operating environment will continue for an extended period of time . the unemployment rate in spain reached 26% ( 26 % ) during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is expected to rise further in 2013 . the international monetary fund , which had projected gdp growth of 1.8% ( 1.8 % ) a year ago , revised its 2013 gdp projections downward for spain to a contraction of 1.3% ( 1.3 % ) during the fourth quarter of 2012 and further reduced it to a contraction of 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) in january of 2013 . during the latter half of 2012 new austerity measures , such as increases to the value added tax , cuts to benefits , the phasing out of exemptions and the suspension of government bonuses , were implemented by the spanish government . we believe these austerity measures are having a larger impact on consumer confidence and discretionary spending than previously anticipated . as a result , there has been a significant deterioration in bookings from guests sourced from spain during the 2013 wave season . the combination of all of these factors has caused us to negatively adjust our cash flow projections , especially our closer-in net yield assumptions and the expectations regarding future capacity growth for the brand . based on our updated cash flow projections , we determined the implied fair value of goodwill for the pullmantur reporting unit was $ 145.5 million and rec- ognized an impairment charge of $ 319.2 million . this impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impairment of pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . there have been no goodwill impairment charges related to the pullmantur reporting unit in prior periods . see note 13 . fair value measurements and derivative instruments for further discussion . if the spanish economy weakens further or recovers more slowly than contemplated or if the economies of other markets ( e.g . france , brazil , latin america ) perform worse than contemplated in our discounted cash flow model , or if there are material changes to the projected future cash flows used in the impair- ment analyses , especially in net yields , an additional impairment charge of the pullmantur reporting unit 2019s goodwill may be required . note 4 . intangible assets intangible assets are reported in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and consist of the follow- ing ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indefinite-life intangible asset 2014pullmantur trademarks and trade names</td><td>$ 218883</td><td>$ 225679</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>impairment charge</td><td>-17356 ( 17356 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>3339</td><td>-6796 ( 6796 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 204866</td><td>$ 218883</td></tr></table> during the fourth quarter of 2012 , we performed the annual impairment review of our trademarks and trade names using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method . the royalty rate used is based on comparable royalty agreements in the tourism and hospitality industry . these trademarks and trade names relate to pullmantur and we have used a discount rate comparable to the rate used in valuing the pullmantur reporting unit in our goodwill impairment test . as described in note 3 . goodwill , the continued deterioration of the spanish economy caused us to negatively adjust our cash flow projections for the pullmantur reporting unit , especially our closer-in net yield assumptions and the timing of future capacity growth for the brand . based on our updated cash flow projections , we determined that the fair value of pullmantur 2019s trademarks and trade names no longer exceeded their carrying value . accordingly , we recog- nized an impairment charge of approximately $ 17.4 million to write down trademarks and trade names to their fair value of $ 204.9 million . this impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impairment of pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . see note 13 . fair value measurements and derivative instruments for further discussion . if the spanish economy weakens further or recovers more slowly than contemplated or if the economies of other markets ( e.g . france , brazil , latin america ) 0494.indd 76 3/27/13 12:53 pm .
Question: what was the change in the value of intangible assets from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: -14017.0
Question: and the percentage change during this time?
| -0.06404 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements competitive environment and general economic and business conditions , among other factors . pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the spanish , portu- guese and latin american markets and although pullmantur has diversified its passenger sourcing over the past few years , spain still represents pullmantur 2019s largest market . as previously disclosed , during 2012 european economies continued to demonstrate insta- bility in light of heightened concerns over sovereign debt issues as well as the impact of proposed auster- ity measures on certain markets . the spanish econ- omy was more severely impacted than many other economies and there is significant uncertainty as to when it will recover . in addition , the impact of the costa concordia incident has had a more lingering effect than expected and the impact in future years is uncertain . these factors were identified in the past as significant risks which could lead to the impairment of pullmantur 2019s goodwill . more recently , the spanish economy has progressively worsened and forecasts suggest the challenging operating environment will continue for an extended period of time . the unemployment rate in spain reached 26% ( 26 % ) during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is expected to rise further in 2013 . the international monetary fund , which had projected gdp growth of 1.8% ( 1.8 % ) a year ago , revised its 2013 gdp projections downward for spain to a contraction of 1.3% ( 1.3 % ) during the fourth quarter of 2012 and further reduced it to a contraction of 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) in january of 2013 . during the latter half of 2012 new austerity measures , such as increases to the value added tax , cuts to benefits , the phasing out of exemptions and the suspension of government bonuses , were implemented by the spanish government . we believe these austerity measures are having a larger impact on consumer confidence and discretionary spending than previously anticipated . as a result , there has been a significant deterioration in bookings from guests sourced from spain during the 2013 wave season . the combination of all of these factors has caused us to negatively adjust our cash flow projections , especially our closer-in net yield assumptions and the expectations regarding future capacity growth for the brand . based on our updated cash flow projections , we determined the implied fair value of goodwill for the pullmantur reporting unit was $ 145.5 million and rec- ognized an impairment charge of $ 319.2 million . this impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impairment of pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . there have been no goodwill impairment charges related to the pullmantur reporting unit in prior periods . see note 13 . fair value measurements and derivative instruments for further discussion . if the spanish economy weakens further or recovers more slowly than contemplated or if the economies of other markets ( e.g . france , brazil , latin america ) perform worse than contemplated in our discounted cash flow model , or if there are material changes to the projected future cash flows used in the impair- ment analyses , especially in net yields , an additional impairment charge of the pullmantur reporting unit 2019s goodwill may be required . note 4 . intangible assets intangible assets are reported in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and consist of the follow- ing ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indefinite-life intangible asset 2014pullmantur trademarks and trade names</td><td>$ 218883</td><td>$ 225679</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>impairment charge</td><td>-17356 ( 17356 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>3339</td><td>-6796 ( 6796 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 204866</td><td>$ 218883</td></tr></table> during the fourth quarter of 2012 , we performed the annual impairment review of our trademarks and trade names using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method . the royalty rate used is based on comparable royalty agreements in the tourism and hospitality industry . these trademarks and trade names relate to pullmantur and we have used a discount rate comparable to the rate used in valuing the pullmantur reporting unit in our goodwill impairment test . as described in note 3 . goodwill , the continued deterioration of the spanish economy caused us to negatively adjust our cash flow projections for the pullmantur reporting unit , especially our closer-in net yield assumptions and the timing of future capacity growth for the brand . based on our updated cash flow projections , we determined that the fair value of pullmantur 2019s trademarks and trade names no longer exceeded their carrying value . accordingly , we recog- nized an impairment charge of approximately $ 17.4 million to write down trademarks and trade names to their fair value of $ 204.9 million . this impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impairment of pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . see note 13 . fair value measurements and derivative instruments for further discussion . if the spanish economy weakens further or recovers more slowly than contemplated or if the economies of other markets ( e.g . france , brazil , latin america ) 0494.indd 76 3/27/13 12:53 pm .
Question: what was the change in the value of intangible assets from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: -14017.0
Question: and the percentage change during this time?
Answer: -0.06404
Question: what was the total value of intangible assets in 2011 and 2012?
| 423749.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
notes to the consolidated financial statements competitive environment and general economic and business conditions , among other factors . pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the spanish , portu- guese and latin american markets and although pullmantur has diversified its passenger sourcing over the past few years , spain still represents pullmantur 2019s largest market . as previously disclosed , during 2012 european economies continued to demonstrate insta- bility in light of heightened concerns over sovereign debt issues as well as the impact of proposed auster- ity measures on certain markets . the spanish econ- omy was more severely impacted than many other economies and there is significant uncertainty as to when it will recover . in addition , the impact of the costa concordia incident has had a more lingering effect than expected and the impact in future years is uncertain . these factors were identified in the past as significant risks which could lead to the impairment of pullmantur 2019s goodwill . more recently , the spanish economy has progressively worsened and forecasts suggest the challenging operating environment will continue for an extended period of time . the unemployment rate in spain reached 26% ( 26 % ) during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is expected to rise further in 2013 . the international monetary fund , which had projected gdp growth of 1.8% ( 1.8 % ) a year ago , revised its 2013 gdp projections downward for spain to a contraction of 1.3% ( 1.3 % ) during the fourth quarter of 2012 and further reduced it to a contraction of 1.5% ( 1.5 % ) in january of 2013 . during the latter half of 2012 new austerity measures , such as increases to the value added tax , cuts to benefits , the phasing out of exemptions and the suspension of government bonuses , were implemented by the spanish government . we believe these austerity measures are having a larger impact on consumer confidence and discretionary spending than previously anticipated . as a result , there has been a significant deterioration in bookings from guests sourced from spain during the 2013 wave season . the combination of all of these factors has caused us to negatively adjust our cash flow projections , especially our closer-in net yield assumptions and the expectations regarding future capacity growth for the brand . based on our updated cash flow projections , we determined the implied fair value of goodwill for the pullmantur reporting unit was $ 145.5 million and rec- ognized an impairment charge of $ 319.2 million . this impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impairment of pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . there have been no goodwill impairment charges related to the pullmantur reporting unit in prior periods . see note 13 . fair value measurements and derivative instruments for further discussion . if the spanish economy weakens further or recovers more slowly than contemplated or if the economies of other markets ( e.g . france , brazil , latin america ) perform worse than contemplated in our discounted cash flow model , or if there are material changes to the projected future cash flows used in the impair- ment analyses , especially in net yields , an additional impairment charge of the pullmantur reporting unit 2019s goodwill may be required . note 4 . intangible assets intangible assets are reported in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and consist of the follow- ing ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>indefinite-life intangible asset 2014pullmantur trademarks and trade names</td><td>$ 218883</td><td>$ 225679</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>impairment charge</td><td>-17356 ( 17356 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>foreign currency translation adjustment</td><td>3339</td><td>-6796 ( 6796 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>$ 204866</td><td>$ 218883</td></tr></table> during the fourth quarter of 2012 , we performed the annual impairment review of our trademarks and trade names using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method . the royalty rate used is based on comparable royalty agreements in the tourism and hospitality industry . these trademarks and trade names relate to pullmantur and we have used a discount rate comparable to the rate used in valuing the pullmantur reporting unit in our goodwill impairment test . as described in note 3 . goodwill , the continued deterioration of the spanish economy caused us to negatively adjust our cash flow projections for the pullmantur reporting unit , especially our closer-in net yield assumptions and the timing of future capacity growth for the brand . based on our updated cash flow projections , we determined that the fair value of pullmantur 2019s trademarks and trade names no longer exceeded their carrying value . accordingly , we recog- nized an impairment charge of approximately $ 17.4 million to write down trademarks and trade names to their fair value of $ 204.9 million . this impairment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impairment of pullmantur related assets within our consolidated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . see note 13 . fair value measurements and derivative instruments for further discussion . if the spanish economy weakens further or recovers more slowly than contemplated or if the economies of other markets ( e.g . france , brazil , latin america ) 0494.indd 76 3/27/13 12:53 pm .
Question: what was the change in the value of intangible assets from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: -14017.0
Question: and the percentage change during this time?
Answer: -0.06404
Question: what was the total value of intangible assets in 2011 and 2012?
Answer: 423749.0
Question: and the average during this time?
| 211874.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) consistent with prior years , we consider a portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries as subject to repatriation and we provide for taxes accordingly . however , we consider the unremitted earnings and all other outside basis differences from all other foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested . accordingly , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due . as of september 30 , 2019 , we estimate our outside basis difference in foreign subsidiaries that are considered indefinitely reinvested to be approximately $ 1.6 billion . the components of the outside basis difference are comprised of purchase accounting adjustments , undistributed earnings , and equity components . except for the portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries where we provided for taxes , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due upon the reversal of the outside basis differences . however , in the event of a distribution in the form of dividends or dispositions of the subsidiaries , we may be subject to incremental u.s . income taxes , subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits , and withholding taxes or income taxes payable to the foreign jurisdictions . as of september 30 , 2019 , the determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to any remaining undistributed foreign earnings not subject to the transition tax and additional outside basis differences is not practicable . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of fiscal year</td><td>$ 127.1</td><td>$ 148.9</td><td>$ 166.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions related to purchase accounting ( 1 )</td><td>1.0</td><td>3.4</td><td>7.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions taken in current year ( 2 )</td><td>103.8</td><td>3.1</td><td>5.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions for tax positions taken in prior fiscal years</td><td>1.8</td><td>18.0</td><td>15.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions for tax positions taken in prior fiscal years</td><td>( 0.5 )</td><td>( 5.3 )</td><td>( 25.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions due to settlement ( 3 )</td><td>( 4.0 )</td><td>( 29.4 )</td><td>( 14.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>( reductions ) additions for currency translation adjustments</td><td>-1.7 ( 1.7 )</td><td>-9.6 ( 9.6 )</td><td>2.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>reductions as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute oflimitations</td><td>( 3.2 )</td><td>( 2.0 )</td><td>( 8.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at end of fiscal year</td><td>$ 224.3</td><td>$ 127.1</td><td>$ 148.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts in fiscal 2019 relate to the kapstone acquisition . amounts in fiscal 2018 and 2017 relate to the mps acquisition . ( 2 ) additions for tax positions taken in current fiscal year includes primarily positions taken related to foreign subsidiaries . ( 3 ) amounts in fiscal 2019 relate to the settlements of state and foreign audit examinations . amounts in fiscal 2018 relate to the settlement of state audit examinations and federal and state amended returns filed related to affirmative adjustments for which there was a reserve . amounts in fiscal 2017 relate to the settlement of federal and state audit examinations with taxing authorities . as of september 30 , 2019 and 2018 , the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $ 224.3 million and $ 127.1 million , respectively , exclusive of interest and penalties . of these balances , as of september 30 , 2019 and 2018 , if we were to prevail on all unrecognized tax benefits recorded , approximately $ 207.5 million and $ 108.7 million , respectively , would benefit the effective tax rate . we regularly evaluate , assess and adjust the related liabilities in light of changing facts and circumstances , which could cause the effective tax rate to fluctuate from period to period . resolution of the uncertain tax positions could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows or materially benefit our results of operations in future periods depending upon their ultimate resolution . see 201cnote 18 . commitments and contingencies 2014 brazil tax liability 201d we recognize estimated interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had liabilities of $ 80.0 million related to estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits . as of september 30 , 2018 , we had liabilities of $ 70.4 million , related to estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits . our results of operations for the fiscal year ended september 30 , 2019 , 2018 and 2017 include expense of $ 9.7 million , $ 5.8 million and $ 7.4 million , respectively , net of indirect benefits , related to estimated interest and penalties with respect to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits . as of september 30 , 2019 , it is reasonably possible that our unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by up to $ 8.7 million in the next twelve months due to expiration of various statues of limitations and settlement of issues. .
Question: what was the value of gross unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2018?
| 127.1 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) consistent with prior years , we consider a portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries as subject to repatriation and we provide for taxes accordingly . however , we consider the unremitted earnings and all other outside basis differences from all other foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested . accordingly , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due . as of september 30 , 2019 , we estimate our outside basis difference in foreign subsidiaries that are considered indefinitely reinvested to be approximately $ 1.6 billion . the components of the outside basis difference are comprised of purchase accounting adjustments , undistributed earnings , and equity components . except for the portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries where we provided for taxes , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due upon the reversal of the outside basis differences . however , in the event of a distribution in the form of dividends or dispositions of the subsidiaries , we may be subject to incremental u.s . income taxes , subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits , and withholding taxes or income taxes payable to the foreign jurisdictions . as of september 30 , 2019 , the determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to any remaining undistributed foreign earnings not subject to the transition tax and additional outside basis differences is not practicable . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of fiscal year</td><td>$ 127.1</td><td>$ 148.9</td><td>$ 166.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions related to purchase accounting ( 1 )</td><td>1.0</td><td>3.4</td><td>7.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions taken in current year ( 2 )</td><td>103.8</td><td>3.1</td><td>5.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions for tax positions taken in prior fiscal years</td><td>1.8</td><td>18.0</td><td>15.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions for tax positions taken in prior fiscal years</td><td>( 0.5 )</td><td>( 5.3 )</td><td>( 25.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions due to settlement ( 3 )</td><td>( 4.0 )</td><td>( 29.4 )</td><td>( 14.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>( reductions ) additions for currency translation adjustments</td><td>-1.7 ( 1.7 )</td><td>-9.6 ( 9.6 )</td><td>2.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>reductions as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute oflimitations</td><td>( 3.2 )</td><td>( 2.0 )</td><td>( 8.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at end of fiscal year</td><td>$ 224.3</td><td>$ 127.1</td><td>$ 148.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts in fiscal 2019 relate to the kapstone acquisition . amounts in fiscal 2018 and 2017 relate to the mps acquisition . ( 2 ) additions for tax positions taken in current fiscal year includes primarily positions taken related to foreign subsidiaries . ( 3 ) amounts in fiscal 2019 relate to the settlements of state and foreign audit examinations . amounts in fiscal 2018 relate to the settlement of state audit examinations and federal and state amended returns filed related to affirmative adjustments for which there was a reserve . amounts in fiscal 2017 relate to the settlement of federal and state audit examinations with taxing authorities . as of september 30 , 2019 and 2018 , the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $ 224.3 million and $ 127.1 million , respectively , exclusive of interest and penalties . of these balances , as of september 30 , 2019 and 2018 , if we were to prevail on all unrecognized tax benefits recorded , approximately $ 207.5 million and $ 108.7 million , respectively , would benefit the effective tax rate . we regularly evaluate , assess and adjust the related liabilities in light of changing facts and circumstances , which could cause the effective tax rate to fluctuate from period to period . resolution of the uncertain tax positions could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows or materially benefit our results of operations in future periods depending upon their ultimate resolution . see 201cnote 18 . commitments and contingencies 2014 brazil tax liability 201d we recognize estimated interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had liabilities of $ 80.0 million related to estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits . as of september 30 , 2018 , we had liabilities of $ 70.4 million , related to estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits . our results of operations for the fiscal year ended september 30 , 2019 , 2018 and 2017 include expense of $ 9.7 million , $ 5.8 million and $ 7.4 million , respectively , net of indirect benefits , related to estimated interest and penalties with respect to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits . as of september 30 , 2019 , it is reasonably possible that our unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by up to $ 8.7 million in the next twelve months due to expiration of various statues of limitations and settlement of issues. .
Question: what was the value of gross unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2018?
Answer: 127.1
Question: what was the value at the end of 2017?
| 148.9 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) consistent with prior years , we consider a portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries as subject to repatriation and we provide for taxes accordingly . however , we consider the unremitted earnings and all other outside basis differences from all other foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested . accordingly , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due . as of september 30 , 2019 , we estimate our outside basis difference in foreign subsidiaries that are considered indefinitely reinvested to be approximately $ 1.6 billion . the components of the outside basis difference are comprised of purchase accounting adjustments , undistributed earnings , and equity components . except for the portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries where we provided for taxes , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due upon the reversal of the outside basis differences . however , in the event of a distribution in the form of dividends or dispositions of the subsidiaries , we may be subject to incremental u.s . income taxes , subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits , and withholding taxes or income taxes payable to the foreign jurisdictions . as of september 30 , 2019 , the determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to any remaining undistributed foreign earnings not subject to the transition tax and additional outside basis differences is not practicable . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of fiscal year</td><td>$ 127.1</td><td>$ 148.9</td><td>$ 166.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions related to purchase accounting ( 1 )</td><td>1.0</td><td>3.4</td><td>7.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions taken in current year ( 2 )</td><td>103.8</td><td>3.1</td><td>5.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions for tax positions taken in prior fiscal years</td><td>1.8</td><td>18.0</td><td>15.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions for tax positions taken in prior fiscal years</td><td>( 0.5 )</td><td>( 5.3 )</td><td>( 25.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions due to settlement ( 3 )</td><td>( 4.0 )</td><td>( 29.4 )</td><td>( 14.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>( reductions ) additions for currency translation adjustments</td><td>-1.7 ( 1.7 )</td><td>-9.6 ( 9.6 )</td><td>2.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>reductions as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute oflimitations</td><td>( 3.2 )</td><td>( 2.0 )</td><td>( 8.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at end of fiscal year</td><td>$ 224.3</td><td>$ 127.1</td><td>$ 148.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts in fiscal 2019 relate to the kapstone acquisition . amounts in fiscal 2018 and 2017 relate to the mps acquisition . ( 2 ) additions for tax positions taken in current fiscal year includes primarily positions taken related to foreign subsidiaries . ( 3 ) amounts in fiscal 2019 relate to the settlements of state and foreign audit examinations . amounts in fiscal 2018 relate to the settlement of state audit examinations and federal and state amended returns filed related to affirmative adjustments for which there was a reserve . amounts in fiscal 2017 relate to the settlement of federal and state audit examinations with taxing authorities . as of september 30 , 2019 and 2018 , the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $ 224.3 million and $ 127.1 million , respectively , exclusive of interest and penalties . of these balances , as of september 30 , 2019 and 2018 , if we were to prevail on all unrecognized tax benefits recorded , approximately $ 207.5 million and $ 108.7 million , respectively , would benefit the effective tax rate . we regularly evaluate , assess and adjust the related liabilities in light of changing facts and circumstances , which could cause the effective tax rate to fluctuate from period to period . resolution of the uncertain tax positions could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows or materially benefit our results of operations in future periods depending upon their ultimate resolution . see 201cnote 18 . commitments and contingencies 2014 brazil tax liability 201d we recognize estimated interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had liabilities of $ 80.0 million related to estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits . as of september 30 , 2018 , we had liabilities of $ 70.4 million , related to estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits . our results of operations for the fiscal year ended september 30 , 2019 , 2018 and 2017 include expense of $ 9.7 million , $ 5.8 million and $ 7.4 million , respectively , net of indirect benefits , related to estimated interest and penalties with respect to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits . as of september 30 , 2019 , it is reasonably possible that our unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by up to $ 8.7 million in the next twelve months due to expiration of various statues of limitations and settlement of issues. .
Question: what was the value of gross unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2018?
Answer: 127.1
Question: what was the value at the end of 2017?
Answer: 148.9
Question: what is the net difference?
| -21.8 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) consistent with prior years , we consider a portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries as subject to repatriation and we provide for taxes accordingly . however , we consider the unremitted earnings and all other outside basis differences from all other foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested . accordingly , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due . as of september 30 , 2019 , we estimate our outside basis difference in foreign subsidiaries that are considered indefinitely reinvested to be approximately $ 1.6 billion . the components of the outside basis difference are comprised of purchase accounting adjustments , undistributed earnings , and equity components . except for the portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries where we provided for taxes , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due upon the reversal of the outside basis differences . however , in the event of a distribution in the form of dividends or dispositions of the subsidiaries , we may be subject to incremental u.s . income taxes , subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits , and withholding taxes or income taxes payable to the foreign jurisdictions . as of september 30 , 2019 , the determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to any remaining undistributed foreign earnings not subject to the transition tax and additional outside basis differences is not practicable . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of fiscal year</td><td>$ 127.1</td><td>$ 148.9</td><td>$ 166.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions related to purchase accounting ( 1 )</td><td>1.0</td><td>3.4</td><td>7.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions taken in current year ( 2 )</td><td>103.8</td><td>3.1</td><td>5.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions for tax positions taken in prior fiscal years</td><td>1.8</td><td>18.0</td><td>15.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions for tax positions taken in prior fiscal years</td><td>( 0.5 )</td><td>( 5.3 )</td><td>( 25.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions due to settlement ( 3 )</td><td>( 4.0 )</td><td>( 29.4 )</td><td>( 14.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>( reductions ) additions for currency translation adjustments</td><td>-1.7 ( 1.7 )</td><td>-9.6 ( 9.6 )</td><td>2.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>reductions as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute oflimitations</td><td>( 3.2 )</td><td>( 2.0 )</td><td>( 8.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at end of fiscal year</td><td>$ 224.3</td><td>$ 127.1</td><td>$ 148.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts in fiscal 2019 relate to the kapstone acquisition . amounts in fiscal 2018 and 2017 relate to the mps acquisition . ( 2 ) additions for tax positions taken in current fiscal year includes primarily positions taken related to foreign subsidiaries . ( 3 ) amounts in fiscal 2019 relate to the settlements of state and foreign audit examinations . amounts in fiscal 2018 relate to the settlement of state audit examinations and federal and state amended returns filed related to affirmative adjustments for which there was a reserve . amounts in fiscal 2017 relate to the settlement of federal and state audit examinations with taxing authorities . as of september 30 , 2019 and 2018 , the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $ 224.3 million and $ 127.1 million , respectively , exclusive of interest and penalties . of these balances , as of september 30 , 2019 and 2018 , if we were to prevail on all unrecognized tax benefits recorded , approximately $ 207.5 million and $ 108.7 million , respectively , would benefit the effective tax rate . we regularly evaluate , assess and adjust the related liabilities in light of changing facts and circumstances , which could cause the effective tax rate to fluctuate from period to period . resolution of the uncertain tax positions could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows or materially benefit our results of operations in future periods depending upon their ultimate resolution . see 201cnote 18 . commitments and contingencies 2014 brazil tax liability 201d we recognize estimated interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had liabilities of $ 80.0 million related to estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits . as of september 30 , 2018 , we had liabilities of $ 70.4 million , related to estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits . our results of operations for the fiscal year ended september 30 , 2019 , 2018 and 2017 include expense of $ 9.7 million , $ 5.8 million and $ 7.4 million , respectively , net of indirect benefits , related to estimated interest and penalties with respect to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits . as of september 30 , 2019 , it is reasonably possible that our unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by up to $ 8.7 million in the next twelve months due to expiration of various statues of limitations and settlement of issues. .
Question: what was the value of gross unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2018?
Answer: 127.1
Question: what was the value at the end of 2017?
Answer: 148.9
Question: what is the net difference?
Answer: -21.8
Question: what was the 2017 value?
| 148.9 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
westrock company notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) consistent with prior years , we consider a portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries as subject to repatriation and we provide for taxes accordingly . however , we consider the unremitted earnings and all other outside basis differences from all other foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested . accordingly , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due . as of september 30 , 2019 , we estimate our outside basis difference in foreign subsidiaries that are considered indefinitely reinvested to be approximately $ 1.6 billion . the components of the outside basis difference are comprised of purchase accounting adjustments , undistributed earnings , and equity components . except for the portion of our earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries where we provided for taxes , we have not provided for any taxes that would be due upon the reversal of the outside basis differences . however , in the event of a distribution in the form of dividends or dispositions of the subsidiaries , we may be subject to incremental u.s . income taxes , subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits , and withholding taxes or income taxes payable to the foreign jurisdictions . as of september 30 , 2019 , the determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to any remaining undistributed foreign earnings not subject to the transition tax and additional outside basis differences is not practicable . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at beginning of fiscal year</td><td>$ 127.1</td><td>$ 148.9</td><td>$ 166.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions related to purchase accounting ( 1 )</td><td>1.0</td><td>3.4</td><td>7.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions taken in current year ( 2 )</td><td>103.8</td><td>3.1</td><td>5.0</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additions for tax positions taken in prior fiscal years</td><td>1.8</td><td>18.0</td><td>15.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>reductions for tax positions taken in prior fiscal years</td><td>( 0.5 )</td><td>( 5.3 )</td><td>( 25.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions due to settlement ( 3 )</td><td>( 4.0 )</td><td>( 29.4 )</td><td>( 14.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>( reductions ) additions for currency translation adjustments</td><td>-1.7 ( 1.7 )</td><td>-9.6 ( 9.6 )</td><td>2.0</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>reductions as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute oflimitations</td><td>( 3.2 )</td><td>( 2.0 )</td><td>( 8.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>balance at end of fiscal year</td><td>$ 224.3</td><td>$ 127.1</td><td>$ 148.9</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) amounts in fiscal 2019 relate to the kapstone acquisition . amounts in fiscal 2018 and 2017 relate to the mps acquisition . ( 2 ) additions for tax positions taken in current fiscal year includes primarily positions taken related to foreign subsidiaries . ( 3 ) amounts in fiscal 2019 relate to the settlements of state and foreign audit examinations . amounts in fiscal 2018 relate to the settlement of state audit examinations and federal and state amended returns filed related to affirmative adjustments for which there was a reserve . amounts in fiscal 2017 relate to the settlement of federal and state audit examinations with taxing authorities . as of september 30 , 2019 and 2018 , the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $ 224.3 million and $ 127.1 million , respectively , exclusive of interest and penalties . of these balances , as of september 30 , 2019 and 2018 , if we were to prevail on all unrecognized tax benefits recorded , approximately $ 207.5 million and $ 108.7 million , respectively , would benefit the effective tax rate . we regularly evaluate , assess and adjust the related liabilities in light of changing facts and circumstances , which could cause the effective tax rate to fluctuate from period to period . resolution of the uncertain tax positions could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows or materially benefit our results of operations in future periods depending upon their ultimate resolution . see 201cnote 18 . commitments and contingencies 2014 brazil tax liability 201d we recognize estimated interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income . as of september 30 , 2019 , we had liabilities of $ 80.0 million related to estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits . as of september 30 , 2018 , we had liabilities of $ 70.4 million , related to estimated interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits . our results of operations for the fiscal year ended september 30 , 2019 , 2018 and 2017 include expense of $ 9.7 million , $ 5.8 million and $ 7.4 million , respectively , net of indirect benefits , related to estimated interest and penalties with respect to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits . as of september 30 , 2019 , it is reasonably possible that our unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by up to $ 8.7 million in the next twelve months due to expiration of various statues of limitations and settlement of issues. .
Question: what was the value of gross unrecognized tax benefits at the end of 2018?
Answer: 127.1
Question: what was the value at the end of 2017?
Answer: 148.9
Question: what is the net difference?
Answer: -21.8
Question: what was the 2017 value?
Answer: 148.9
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.14641 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . the accruals for deferred tax assets and liabilities are subject to a significant amount of judgment by management and are reviewed and adjusted routinely based on changes in facts and circumstances . material changes in these accruals may occur in the future , based on the progress of ongoing tax audits , changes in legislation and resolution of pending tax matters . forward-looking estimates we are providing our 2011 forward-looking estimates in this section . these estimates were based on our examination of historical operating trends , the information used to prepare our december 31 , 2010 , reserve reports and other data in our possession or available from third parties . the forward-looking estimates in this report were prepared assuming demand , curtailment , producibility and general market conditions for our oil , gas and ngls during 2011 will be similar to 2010 , unless otherwise noted . we make reference to the 201cdisclosure regarding forward-looking statements 201d at the beginning of this report . amounts related to our canadian operations have been converted to u.s . dollars using an estimated average 2011 exchange rate of $ 0.95 dollar to $ 1.00 canadian dollar . during 2011 , our operations are substantially comprised of our ongoing north america onshore operations . we also have international operations in brazil and angola that we are divesting . we have entered into agreements to sell our assets in brazil for $ 3.2 billion and our assets in angola for $ 70 million , plus contingent consideration . as a result of these divestitures , all revenues , expenses and capital related to our international operations are reported as discontinued operations in our financial statements . additionally , all forward-looking estimates in this document exclude amounts related to our international operations , unless otherwise noted . north america onshore operating items the following 2011 estimates relate only to our north america onshore assets . oil , gas and ngl production set forth below are our estimates of oil , gas and ngl production for 2011 . we estimate that our combined oil , gas and ngl production will total approximately 236 to 240 mmboe . ( mmbbls ) ( mmbbls ) ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>oil ( mmbbls )</td><td>gas ( bcf )</td><td>ngls ( mmbbls )</td><td>total ( mmboe )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . onshore</td><td>17</td><td>736</td><td>34</td><td>174</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>28</td><td>199</td><td>3</td><td>64</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>north america onshore</td><td>45</td><td>935</td><td>37</td><td>238</td></tr></table> oil and gas prices we expect our 2011 average prices for the oil and gas production from each of our operating areas to differ from the nymex price as set forth in the following table . the expected ranges for prices are exclusive of the anticipated effects of the financial contracts presented in the 201ccommodity price risk management 201d section below . the nymex price for oil is determined using the monthly average of settled prices on each trading day for benchmark west texas intermediate crude oil delivered at cushing , oklahoma . the nymex price for gas is determined using the first-of-month south louisiana henry hub price index as published monthly in inside .
Question: what is the amount of gas supplied from us onshore?
| 736.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . the accruals for deferred tax assets and liabilities are subject to a significant amount of judgment by management and are reviewed and adjusted routinely based on changes in facts and circumstances . material changes in these accruals may occur in the future , based on the progress of ongoing tax audits , changes in legislation and resolution of pending tax matters . forward-looking estimates we are providing our 2011 forward-looking estimates in this section . these estimates were based on our examination of historical operating trends , the information used to prepare our december 31 , 2010 , reserve reports and other data in our possession or available from third parties . the forward-looking estimates in this report were prepared assuming demand , curtailment , producibility and general market conditions for our oil , gas and ngls during 2011 will be similar to 2010 , unless otherwise noted . we make reference to the 201cdisclosure regarding forward-looking statements 201d at the beginning of this report . amounts related to our canadian operations have been converted to u.s . dollars using an estimated average 2011 exchange rate of $ 0.95 dollar to $ 1.00 canadian dollar . during 2011 , our operations are substantially comprised of our ongoing north america onshore operations . we also have international operations in brazil and angola that we are divesting . we have entered into agreements to sell our assets in brazil for $ 3.2 billion and our assets in angola for $ 70 million , plus contingent consideration . as a result of these divestitures , all revenues , expenses and capital related to our international operations are reported as discontinued operations in our financial statements . additionally , all forward-looking estimates in this document exclude amounts related to our international operations , unless otherwise noted . north america onshore operating items the following 2011 estimates relate only to our north america onshore assets . oil , gas and ngl production set forth below are our estimates of oil , gas and ngl production for 2011 . we estimate that our combined oil , gas and ngl production will total approximately 236 to 240 mmboe . ( mmbbls ) ( mmbbls ) ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>oil ( mmbbls )</td><td>gas ( bcf )</td><td>ngls ( mmbbls )</td><td>total ( mmboe )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . onshore</td><td>17</td><td>736</td><td>34</td><td>174</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>28</td><td>199</td><td>3</td><td>64</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>north america onshore</td><td>45</td><td>935</td><td>37</td><td>238</td></tr></table> oil and gas prices we expect our 2011 average prices for the oil and gas production from each of our operating areas to differ from the nymex price as set forth in the following table . the expected ranges for prices are exclusive of the anticipated effects of the financial contracts presented in the 201ccommodity price risk management 201d section below . the nymex price for oil is determined using the monthly average of settled prices on each trading day for benchmark west texas intermediate crude oil delivered at cushing , oklahoma . the nymex price for gas is determined using the first-of-month south louisiana henry hub price index as published monthly in inside .
Question: what is the amount of gas supplied from us onshore?
Answer: 736.0
Question: what is the total amount of gas that comes from north america onshore?
| 935.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . the accruals for deferred tax assets and liabilities are subject to a significant amount of judgment by management and are reviewed and adjusted routinely based on changes in facts and circumstances . material changes in these accruals may occur in the future , based on the progress of ongoing tax audits , changes in legislation and resolution of pending tax matters . forward-looking estimates we are providing our 2011 forward-looking estimates in this section . these estimates were based on our examination of historical operating trends , the information used to prepare our december 31 , 2010 , reserve reports and other data in our possession or available from third parties . the forward-looking estimates in this report were prepared assuming demand , curtailment , producibility and general market conditions for our oil , gas and ngls during 2011 will be similar to 2010 , unless otherwise noted . we make reference to the 201cdisclosure regarding forward-looking statements 201d at the beginning of this report . amounts related to our canadian operations have been converted to u.s . dollars using an estimated average 2011 exchange rate of $ 0.95 dollar to $ 1.00 canadian dollar . during 2011 , our operations are substantially comprised of our ongoing north america onshore operations . we also have international operations in brazil and angola that we are divesting . we have entered into agreements to sell our assets in brazil for $ 3.2 billion and our assets in angola for $ 70 million , plus contingent consideration . as a result of these divestitures , all revenues , expenses and capital related to our international operations are reported as discontinued operations in our financial statements . additionally , all forward-looking estimates in this document exclude amounts related to our international operations , unless otherwise noted . north america onshore operating items the following 2011 estimates relate only to our north america onshore assets . oil , gas and ngl production set forth below are our estimates of oil , gas and ngl production for 2011 . we estimate that our combined oil , gas and ngl production will total approximately 236 to 240 mmboe . ( mmbbls ) ( mmbbls ) ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>oil ( mmbbls )</td><td>gas ( bcf )</td><td>ngls ( mmbbls )</td><td>total ( mmboe )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . onshore</td><td>17</td><td>736</td><td>34</td><td>174</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>28</td><td>199</td><td>3</td><td>64</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>north america onshore</td><td>45</td><td>935</td><td>37</td><td>238</td></tr></table> oil and gas prices we expect our 2011 average prices for the oil and gas production from each of our operating areas to differ from the nymex price as set forth in the following table . the expected ranges for prices are exclusive of the anticipated effects of the financial contracts presented in the 201ccommodity price risk management 201d section below . the nymex price for oil is determined using the monthly average of settled prices on each trading day for benchmark west texas intermediate crude oil delivered at cushing , oklahoma . the nymex price for gas is determined using the first-of-month south louisiana henry hub price index as published monthly in inside .
Question: what is the amount of gas supplied from us onshore?
Answer: 736.0
Question: what is the total amount of gas that comes from north america onshore?
Answer: 935.0
Question: what is the ratio of gas from us onshore?
| 0.78717 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . the accruals for deferred tax assets and liabilities are subject to a significant amount of judgment by management and are reviewed and adjusted routinely based on changes in facts and circumstances . material changes in these accruals may occur in the future , based on the progress of ongoing tax audits , changes in legislation and resolution of pending tax matters . forward-looking estimates we are providing our 2011 forward-looking estimates in this section . these estimates were based on our examination of historical operating trends , the information used to prepare our december 31 , 2010 , reserve reports and other data in our possession or available from third parties . the forward-looking estimates in this report were prepared assuming demand , curtailment , producibility and general market conditions for our oil , gas and ngls during 2011 will be similar to 2010 , unless otherwise noted . we make reference to the 201cdisclosure regarding forward-looking statements 201d at the beginning of this report . amounts related to our canadian operations have been converted to u.s . dollars using an estimated average 2011 exchange rate of $ 0.95 dollar to $ 1.00 canadian dollar . during 2011 , our operations are substantially comprised of our ongoing north america onshore operations . we also have international operations in brazil and angola that we are divesting . we have entered into agreements to sell our assets in brazil for $ 3.2 billion and our assets in angola for $ 70 million , plus contingent consideration . as a result of these divestitures , all revenues , expenses and capital related to our international operations are reported as discontinued operations in our financial statements . additionally , all forward-looking estimates in this document exclude amounts related to our international operations , unless otherwise noted . north america onshore operating items the following 2011 estimates relate only to our north america onshore assets . oil , gas and ngl production set forth below are our estimates of oil , gas and ngl production for 2011 . we estimate that our combined oil , gas and ngl production will total approximately 236 to 240 mmboe . ( mmbbls ) ( mmbbls ) ( mmboe ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>oil ( mmbbls )</td><td>gas ( bcf )</td><td>ngls ( mmbbls )</td><td>total ( mmboe )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . onshore</td><td>17</td><td>736</td><td>34</td><td>174</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>canada</td><td>28</td><td>199</td><td>3</td><td>64</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>north america onshore</td><td>45</td><td>935</td><td>37</td><td>238</td></tr></table> oil and gas prices we expect our 2011 average prices for the oil and gas production from each of our operating areas to differ from the nymex price as set forth in the following table . the expected ranges for prices are exclusive of the anticipated effects of the financial contracts presented in the 201ccommodity price risk management 201d section below . the nymex price for oil is determined using the monthly average of settled prices on each trading day for benchmark west texas intermediate crude oil delivered at cushing , oklahoma . the nymex price for gas is determined using the first-of-month south louisiana henry hub price index as published monthly in inside .
Question: what is the amount of gas supplied from us onshore?
Answer: 736.0
Question: what is the total amount of gas that comes from north america onshore?
Answer: 935.0
Question: what is the ratio of gas from us onshore?
Answer: 0.78717
Question: what is that displayed as a percentage?
| 78.71658 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
higher average borrowings . additionally , the recapitalization that occurred late in the first quarter of 2005 resulted in a full year of interest in 2006 as compared to approximately ten months in 2005 . the increase in interest expense in 2005 as compared to 2004 also resulted from the recapitalization in 2005 . income tax expense income tax expense totaled $ 150.2 million , $ 116.1 million and $ 118.3 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . this resulted in an effective tax rate of 37.2% ( 37.2 % ) , 37.2% ( 37.2 % ) and 37.6% ( 37.6 % ) for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . net earnings net earnings totaled $ 259.1 million , $ 196.6 and $ 189.4 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , or $ 1.37 , $ 1.53 and $ 1.48 per diluted share , respectively . segment results of operations transaction processing services ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>processing and services revenues</td><td>$ 2458777</td><td>$ 1208430</td><td>$ 892033</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of revenues</td><td>1914148</td><td>904124</td><td>667078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross profit</td><td>544629</td><td>304306</td><td>224955</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>selling general and administrative expenses</td><td>171106</td><td>94889</td><td>99581</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>research and development costs</td><td>70879</td><td>85702</td><td>54038</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 302644</td><td>$ 123715</td><td>$ 71336</td></tr></table> revenues for the transaction processing services segment are derived from three main revenue channels ; enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international . revenues from transaction processing services totaled $ 2458.8 million , $ 1208.4 and $ 892.0 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the overall segment increase of $ 1250.4 million during 2006 , as compared to 2005 was primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 1067.2 million to the overall increase . the majority of the remaining 2006 growth is attributable to organic growth within the historically owned integrated financial solutions and international revenue channels , with international including $ 31.9 million related to the newly formed business process outsourcing operation in brazil . the overall segment increase of $ 316.4 in 2005 as compared to 2004 results from the inclusion of a full year of results for the 2004 acquisitions of aurum , sanchez , kordoba , and intercept , which contributed $ 301.1 million of the increase . cost of revenues for the transaction processing services segment totaled $ 1914.1 million , $ 904.1 million and $ 667.1 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the overall segment increase of $ 1010.0 million during 2006 as compared to 2005 was primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 848.2 million to the increase . gross profit as a percentage of revenues ( 201cgross margin 201d ) was 22.2% ( 22.2 % ) , 25.2% ( 25.2 % ) and 25.2% ( 25.2 % ) for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the decrease in gross profit in 2006 as compared to 2005 is primarily due to the february 1 , 2006 certegy merger , which businesses typically have lower margins than those of the historically owned fis businesses . incremental intangible asset amortization relating to the certegy merger also contributed to the decrease in gross margin . included in cost of revenues was depreciation and amortization of $ 272.4 million , $ 139.8 million , and $ 94.6 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . selling , general and administrative expenses totaled $ 171.1 million , $ 94.9 million and $ 99.6 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the increase in 2006 compared to 2005 is primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 73.7 million to the overall increase of $ 76.2 million . the decrease of $ 4.7 million in 2005 as compared to 2004 is primarily attributable to the effect of acquisition related costs in 2004 . included in selling , general and administrative expenses was depreciation and amortization of $ 11.0 million , $ 9.1 million and $ 2.3 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively. .
Question: what was the net change in operating income from 2005 to 2006?
| 178929.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
higher average borrowings . additionally , the recapitalization that occurred late in the first quarter of 2005 resulted in a full year of interest in 2006 as compared to approximately ten months in 2005 . the increase in interest expense in 2005 as compared to 2004 also resulted from the recapitalization in 2005 . income tax expense income tax expense totaled $ 150.2 million , $ 116.1 million and $ 118.3 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . this resulted in an effective tax rate of 37.2% ( 37.2 % ) , 37.2% ( 37.2 % ) and 37.6% ( 37.6 % ) for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . net earnings net earnings totaled $ 259.1 million , $ 196.6 and $ 189.4 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , or $ 1.37 , $ 1.53 and $ 1.48 per diluted share , respectively . segment results of operations transaction processing services ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>processing and services revenues</td><td>$ 2458777</td><td>$ 1208430</td><td>$ 892033</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of revenues</td><td>1914148</td><td>904124</td><td>667078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross profit</td><td>544629</td><td>304306</td><td>224955</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>selling general and administrative expenses</td><td>171106</td><td>94889</td><td>99581</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>research and development costs</td><td>70879</td><td>85702</td><td>54038</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 302644</td><td>$ 123715</td><td>$ 71336</td></tr></table> revenues for the transaction processing services segment are derived from three main revenue channels ; enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international . revenues from transaction processing services totaled $ 2458.8 million , $ 1208.4 and $ 892.0 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the overall segment increase of $ 1250.4 million during 2006 , as compared to 2005 was primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 1067.2 million to the overall increase . the majority of the remaining 2006 growth is attributable to organic growth within the historically owned integrated financial solutions and international revenue channels , with international including $ 31.9 million related to the newly formed business process outsourcing operation in brazil . the overall segment increase of $ 316.4 in 2005 as compared to 2004 results from the inclusion of a full year of results for the 2004 acquisitions of aurum , sanchez , kordoba , and intercept , which contributed $ 301.1 million of the increase . cost of revenues for the transaction processing services segment totaled $ 1914.1 million , $ 904.1 million and $ 667.1 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the overall segment increase of $ 1010.0 million during 2006 as compared to 2005 was primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 848.2 million to the increase . gross profit as a percentage of revenues ( 201cgross margin 201d ) was 22.2% ( 22.2 % ) , 25.2% ( 25.2 % ) and 25.2% ( 25.2 % ) for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the decrease in gross profit in 2006 as compared to 2005 is primarily due to the february 1 , 2006 certegy merger , which businesses typically have lower margins than those of the historically owned fis businesses . incremental intangible asset amortization relating to the certegy merger also contributed to the decrease in gross margin . included in cost of revenues was depreciation and amortization of $ 272.4 million , $ 139.8 million , and $ 94.6 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . selling , general and administrative expenses totaled $ 171.1 million , $ 94.9 million and $ 99.6 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the increase in 2006 compared to 2005 is primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 73.7 million to the overall increase of $ 76.2 million . the decrease of $ 4.7 million in 2005 as compared to 2004 is primarily attributable to the effect of acquisition related costs in 2004 . included in selling , general and administrative expenses was depreciation and amortization of $ 11.0 million , $ 9.1 million and $ 2.3 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively. .
Question: what was the net change in operating income from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: 178929.0
Question: what was the operating income in 2005?
| 123715.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
higher average borrowings . additionally , the recapitalization that occurred late in the first quarter of 2005 resulted in a full year of interest in 2006 as compared to approximately ten months in 2005 . the increase in interest expense in 2005 as compared to 2004 also resulted from the recapitalization in 2005 . income tax expense income tax expense totaled $ 150.2 million , $ 116.1 million and $ 118.3 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . this resulted in an effective tax rate of 37.2% ( 37.2 % ) , 37.2% ( 37.2 % ) and 37.6% ( 37.6 % ) for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . net earnings net earnings totaled $ 259.1 million , $ 196.6 and $ 189.4 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , or $ 1.37 , $ 1.53 and $ 1.48 per diluted share , respectively . segment results of operations transaction processing services ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>processing and services revenues</td><td>$ 2458777</td><td>$ 1208430</td><td>$ 892033</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of revenues</td><td>1914148</td><td>904124</td><td>667078</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross profit</td><td>544629</td><td>304306</td><td>224955</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>selling general and administrative expenses</td><td>171106</td><td>94889</td><td>99581</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>research and development costs</td><td>70879</td><td>85702</td><td>54038</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 302644</td><td>$ 123715</td><td>$ 71336</td></tr></table> revenues for the transaction processing services segment are derived from three main revenue channels ; enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international . revenues from transaction processing services totaled $ 2458.8 million , $ 1208.4 and $ 892.0 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the overall segment increase of $ 1250.4 million during 2006 , as compared to 2005 was primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 1067.2 million to the overall increase . the majority of the remaining 2006 growth is attributable to organic growth within the historically owned integrated financial solutions and international revenue channels , with international including $ 31.9 million related to the newly formed business process outsourcing operation in brazil . the overall segment increase of $ 316.4 in 2005 as compared to 2004 results from the inclusion of a full year of results for the 2004 acquisitions of aurum , sanchez , kordoba , and intercept , which contributed $ 301.1 million of the increase . cost of revenues for the transaction processing services segment totaled $ 1914.1 million , $ 904.1 million and $ 667.1 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the overall segment increase of $ 1010.0 million during 2006 as compared to 2005 was primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 848.2 million to the increase . gross profit as a percentage of revenues ( 201cgross margin 201d ) was 22.2% ( 22.2 % ) , 25.2% ( 25.2 % ) and 25.2% ( 25.2 % ) for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the decrease in gross profit in 2006 as compared to 2005 is primarily due to the february 1 , 2006 certegy merger , which businesses typically have lower margins than those of the historically owned fis businesses . incremental intangible asset amortization relating to the certegy merger also contributed to the decrease in gross margin . included in cost of revenues was depreciation and amortization of $ 272.4 million , $ 139.8 million , and $ 94.6 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . selling , general and administrative expenses totaled $ 171.1 million , $ 94.9 million and $ 99.6 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . the increase in 2006 compared to 2005 is primarily attributable to the certegy merger which contributed $ 73.7 million to the overall increase of $ 76.2 million . the decrease of $ 4.7 million in 2005 as compared to 2004 is primarily attributable to the effect of acquisition related costs in 2004 . included in selling , general and administrative expenses was depreciation and amortization of $ 11.0 million , $ 9.1 million and $ 2.3 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively. .
Question: what was the net change in operating income from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: 178929.0
Question: what was the operating income in 2005?
Answer: 123715.0
Question: what was the percent change?
| 1.4463 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
table of contents part ii price range our common stock commenced trading on the nasdaq national market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d on november 5 , 2004 . prior to that date , there was no public market for our common stock . on november 4 , 2004 , the registration statement relating to our initial public offering was declared effective by the sec . the high and low bid information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on march 28 , 2005 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq national market was $ 10.26 . holders there were approximately 188 holders of record of our common stock as of march 28 , 2005 . dividend policy we have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock since our inception . we intend to retain future earnings to finance the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future . in the event we decide to declare dividends on our common stock in the future , such declaration will be subject to the discretion of our board of directors . our board may take into account such matters as general business conditions , our financial results , capital requirements , contractual , legal , and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends by us to our stockholders or by our subsidiaries to us and any such other factors as our board may deem relevant . use of proceeds on november 4 , 2004 , the registration statement relating to our initial public offering ( no . 333-112718 ) was declared effective . we received net proceeds from the sale of the shares of our common stock in the offering of $ 53.9 million , at an initial public offering price of $ 11.00 per share , after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses . additionally , prior to the closing of the initial public offering , all outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock were converted into 14484493 shares of common stock and 4266310 shares of non-voting common stock . the underwriters for our initial public offering were credit suisse first boston llc , j.p . morgan securities inc. , banc of america securities llc , bear , stearns & co . inc . and ubs securities llc . all of the underwriters are affiliates of some of our broker-dealer clients and affiliates of some our institutional investor clients . in addition , affiliates of all the underwriters are stockholders of ours . except for salaries , and reimbursements for travel expenses and other out-of-pocket costs incurred in the ordinary course of business , none of the proceeds from the offering have been paid by us , directly or indirectly , to any of our directors or officers or any of their associates , or to any persons owning ten percent or more of our outstanding stock or to any of our affiliates . as of december 31 , 2004 , we have not used any of the net proceeds from the initial public offering for product development costs , sales and marketing activities and working capital . we have invested the proceeds from the offering in cash and cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities pending their use for these or other purposes . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities november 5 , 2004 december 31 , 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 24.41</td><td>$ 12.75</td></tr></table> .
Question: from november 5 to december 31 of 2004, what was the numerical range of the share price?
| 11.66 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
table of contents part ii price range our common stock commenced trading on the nasdaq national market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d on november 5 , 2004 . prior to that date , there was no public market for our common stock . on november 4 , 2004 , the registration statement relating to our initial public offering was declared effective by the sec . the high and low bid information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on march 28 , 2005 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq national market was $ 10.26 . holders there were approximately 188 holders of record of our common stock as of march 28 , 2005 . dividend policy we have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock since our inception . we intend to retain future earnings to finance the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future . in the event we decide to declare dividends on our common stock in the future , such declaration will be subject to the discretion of our board of directors . our board may take into account such matters as general business conditions , our financial results , capital requirements , contractual , legal , and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends by us to our stockholders or by our subsidiaries to us and any such other factors as our board may deem relevant . use of proceeds on november 4 , 2004 , the registration statement relating to our initial public offering ( no . 333-112718 ) was declared effective . we received net proceeds from the sale of the shares of our common stock in the offering of $ 53.9 million , at an initial public offering price of $ 11.00 per share , after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses . additionally , prior to the closing of the initial public offering , all outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock were converted into 14484493 shares of common stock and 4266310 shares of non-voting common stock . the underwriters for our initial public offering were credit suisse first boston llc , j.p . morgan securities inc. , banc of america securities llc , bear , stearns & co . inc . and ubs securities llc . all of the underwriters are affiliates of some of our broker-dealer clients and affiliates of some our institutional investor clients . in addition , affiliates of all the underwriters are stockholders of ours . except for salaries , and reimbursements for travel expenses and other out-of-pocket costs incurred in the ordinary course of business , none of the proceeds from the offering have been paid by us , directly or indirectly , to any of our directors or officers or any of their associates , or to any persons owning ten percent or more of our outstanding stock or to any of our affiliates . as of december 31 , 2004 , we have not used any of the net proceeds from the initial public offering for product development costs , sales and marketing activities and working capital . we have invested the proceeds from the offering in cash and cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities pending their use for these or other purposes . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities november 5 , 2004 december 31 , 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 24.41</td><td>$ 12.75</td></tr></table> .
Question: from november 5 to december 31 of 2004, what was the numerical range of the share price?
Answer: 11.66
Question: and as of march 28 of the next year, what was the last reported closing price of the common stock on the nasdaq national market?
| 10.26 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
table of contents part ii price range our common stock commenced trading on the nasdaq national market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d on november 5 , 2004 . prior to that date , there was no public market for our common stock . on november 4 , 2004 , the registration statement relating to our initial public offering was declared effective by the sec . the high and low bid information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on march 28 , 2005 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq national market was $ 10.26 . holders there were approximately 188 holders of record of our common stock as of march 28 , 2005 . dividend policy we have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock since our inception . we intend to retain future earnings to finance the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future . in the event we decide to declare dividends on our common stock in the future , such declaration will be subject to the discretion of our board of directors . our board may take into account such matters as general business conditions , our financial results , capital requirements , contractual , legal , and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends by us to our stockholders or by our subsidiaries to us and any such other factors as our board may deem relevant . use of proceeds on november 4 , 2004 , the registration statement relating to our initial public offering ( no . 333-112718 ) was declared effective . we received net proceeds from the sale of the shares of our common stock in the offering of $ 53.9 million , at an initial public offering price of $ 11.00 per share , after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses . additionally , prior to the closing of the initial public offering , all outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock were converted into 14484493 shares of common stock and 4266310 shares of non-voting common stock . the underwriters for our initial public offering were credit suisse first boston llc , j.p . morgan securities inc. , banc of america securities llc , bear , stearns & co . inc . and ubs securities llc . all of the underwriters are affiliates of some of our broker-dealer clients and affiliates of some our institutional investor clients . in addition , affiliates of all the underwriters are stockholders of ours . except for salaries , and reimbursements for travel expenses and other out-of-pocket costs incurred in the ordinary course of business , none of the proceeds from the offering have been paid by us , directly or indirectly , to any of our directors or officers or any of their associates , or to any persons owning ten percent or more of our outstanding stock or to any of our affiliates . as of december 31 , 2004 , we have not used any of the net proceeds from the initial public offering for product development costs , sales and marketing activities and working capital . we have invested the proceeds from the offering in cash and cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities pending their use for these or other purposes . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities november 5 , 2004 december 31 , 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 24.41</td><td>$ 12.75</td></tr></table> .
Question: from november 5 to december 31 of 2004, what was the numerical range of the share price?
Answer: 11.66
Question: and as of march 28 of the next year, what was the last reported closing price of the common stock on the nasdaq national market?
Answer: 10.26
Question: and what was the amount of holders of record of that common stock?
| 188.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
table of contents part ii price range our common stock commenced trading on the nasdaq national market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d on november 5 , 2004 . prior to that date , there was no public market for our common stock . on november 4 , 2004 , the registration statement relating to our initial public offering was declared effective by the sec . the high and low bid information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on march 28 , 2005 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq national market was $ 10.26 . holders there were approximately 188 holders of record of our common stock as of march 28 , 2005 . dividend policy we have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock since our inception . we intend to retain future earnings to finance the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future . in the event we decide to declare dividends on our common stock in the future , such declaration will be subject to the discretion of our board of directors . our board may take into account such matters as general business conditions , our financial results , capital requirements , contractual , legal , and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends by us to our stockholders or by our subsidiaries to us and any such other factors as our board may deem relevant . use of proceeds on november 4 , 2004 , the registration statement relating to our initial public offering ( no . 333-112718 ) was declared effective . we received net proceeds from the sale of the shares of our common stock in the offering of $ 53.9 million , at an initial public offering price of $ 11.00 per share , after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses . additionally , prior to the closing of the initial public offering , all outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock were converted into 14484493 shares of common stock and 4266310 shares of non-voting common stock . the underwriters for our initial public offering were credit suisse first boston llc , j.p . morgan securities inc. , banc of america securities llc , bear , stearns & co . inc . and ubs securities llc . all of the underwriters are affiliates of some of our broker-dealer clients and affiliates of some our institutional investor clients . in addition , affiliates of all the underwriters are stockholders of ours . except for salaries , and reimbursements for travel expenses and other out-of-pocket costs incurred in the ordinary course of business , none of the proceeds from the offering have been paid by us , directly or indirectly , to any of our directors or officers or any of their associates , or to any persons owning ten percent or more of our outstanding stock or to any of our affiliates . as of december 31 , 2004 , we have not used any of the net proceeds from the initial public offering for product development costs , sales and marketing activities and working capital . we have invested the proceeds from the offering in cash and cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities pending their use for these or other purposes . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities november 5 , 2004 december 31 , 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 24.41</td><td>$ 12.75</td></tr></table> .
Question: from november 5 to december 31 of 2004, what was the numerical range of the share price?
Answer: 11.66
Question: and as of march 28 of the next year, what was the last reported closing price of the common stock on the nasdaq national market?
Answer: 10.26
Question: and what was the amount of holders of record of that common stock?
Answer: 188.0
Question: what was, then, the market cap of that common stock as of that date?
| 1928.88 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
$ 25.7 million in cash , including $ 4.2 million in taxes and 1373609 of hep 2019s common units having a fair value of $ 53.5 million . roadrunner / beeson pipelines transaction also on december 1 , 2009 , hep acquired our two newly constructed pipelines for $ 46.5 million , consisting of a 65- mile , 16-inch crude oil pipeline ( the 201croadrunner pipeline 201d ) that connects our navajo refinery lovington facility to a terminus of centurion pipeline l.p . 2019s pipeline extending between west texas and cushing , oklahoma and a 37- mile , 8-inch crude oil pipeline that connects hep 2019s new mexico crude oil gathering system to our navajo refinery lovington facility ( the 201cbeeson pipeline 201d ) . tulsa west loading racks transaction on august 1 , 2009 , hep acquired from us , certain truck and rail loading/unloading facilities located at our tulsa west facility for $ 17.5 million . the racks load refined products and lube oils produced at the tulsa west facility onto rail cars and/or tanker trucks . lovington-artesia pipeline transaction on june 1 , 2009 , hep acquired our newly constructed , 16-inch intermediate pipeline for $ 34.2 million that runs 65 miles from our navajo refinery 2019s crude oil distillation and vacuum facilities in lovington , new mexico to its petroleum refinery located in artesia , new mexico . slc pipeline joint venture interest on march 1 , 2009 , hep acquired a 25% ( 25 % ) joint venture interest in the slc pipeline , a new 95-mile intrastate pipeline system jointly owned with plains . the slc pipeline commenced operations effective march 2009 and allows various refineries in the salt lake city area , including our woods cross refinery , to ship crude oil into the salt lake city area from the utah terminus of the frontier pipeline as well as crude oil flowing from wyoming and utah via plains 2019 rocky mountain pipeline . hep 2019s capitalized joint venture contribution was $ 25.5 million . rio grande pipeline sale on december 1 , 2009 , hep sold its 70% ( 70 % ) interest in rio grande pipeline company ( 201crio grande 201d ) to a subsidiary of enterprise products partners lp for $ 35 million . results of operations of rio grande are presented in discontinued operations . in accounting for this sale , hep recorded a gain of $ 14.5 million and a receivable of $ 2.2 million representing its final distribution from rio grande . the recorded net asset balance of rio grande at december 1 , 2009 , was $ 22.7 million , consisting of cash of $ 3.1 million , $ 29.9 million in properties and equipment , net and $ 10.3 million in equity , representing bp , plc 2019s 30% ( 30 % ) noncontrolling interest . the following table provides income statement information related to hep 2019s discontinued operations : year ended december 31 , 2009 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended december 31 2009 ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>income from discontinued operations before income taxes</td><td>$ 5367</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>-942 ( 942 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income from discontinued operations net</td><td>4425</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gain on sale of discontinued operations before income taxes</td><td>14479</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>-1978 ( 1978 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gain on sale of discontinued operations net</td><td>12501</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>income from discontinued operations net</td><td>$ 16926</td></tr></table> transportation agreements hep serves our refineries under long-term pipeline and terminal , tankage and throughput agreements expiring in 2019 through 2026 . under these agreements , we pay hep fees to transport , store and throughput volumes of refined product and crude oil on hep 2019s pipeline and terminal , tankage and loading rack facilities that result in minimum annual payments to hep . under these agreements , the agreed upon tariff rates are subject to annual tariff rate adjustments on july 1 at a rate based upon the percentage change in producer price index ( 201cppi 201d ) or federal energy .
Question: in the year of 2009, how much did the income tax expense represent in relation to the gain on sale of discontinued operations before income taxes?
| 0.13661 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
$ 25.7 million in cash , including $ 4.2 million in taxes and 1373609 of hep 2019s common units having a fair value of $ 53.5 million . roadrunner / beeson pipelines transaction also on december 1 , 2009 , hep acquired our two newly constructed pipelines for $ 46.5 million , consisting of a 65- mile , 16-inch crude oil pipeline ( the 201croadrunner pipeline 201d ) that connects our navajo refinery lovington facility to a terminus of centurion pipeline l.p . 2019s pipeline extending between west texas and cushing , oklahoma and a 37- mile , 8-inch crude oil pipeline that connects hep 2019s new mexico crude oil gathering system to our navajo refinery lovington facility ( the 201cbeeson pipeline 201d ) . tulsa west loading racks transaction on august 1 , 2009 , hep acquired from us , certain truck and rail loading/unloading facilities located at our tulsa west facility for $ 17.5 million . the racks load refined products and lube oils produced at the tulsa west facility onto rail cars and/or tanker trucks . lovington-artesia pipeline transaction on june 1 , 2009 , hep acquired our newly constructed , 16-inch intermediate pipeline for $ 34.2 million that runs 65 miles from our navajo refinery 2019s crude oil distillation and vacuum facilities in lovington , new mexico to its petroleum refinery located in artesia , new mexico . slc pipeline joint venture interest on march 1 , 2009 , hep acquired a 25% ( 25 % ) joint venture interest in the slc pipeline , a new 95-mile intrastate pipeline system jointly owned with plains . the slc pipeline commenced operations effective march 2009 and allows various refineries in the salt lake city area , including our woods cross refinery , to ship crude oil into the salt lake city area from the utah terminus of the frontier pipeline as well as crude oil flowing from wyoming and utah via plains 2019 rocky mountain pipeline . hep 2019s capitalized joint venture contribution was $ 25.5 million . rio grande pipeline sale on december 1 , 2009 , hep sold its 70% ( 70 % ) interest in rio grande pipeline company ( 201crio grande 201d ) to a subsidiary of enterprise products partners lp for $ 35 million . results of operations of rio grande are presented in discontinued operations . in accounting for this sale , hep recorded a gain of $ 14.5 million and a receivable of $ 2.2 million representing its final distribution from rio grande . the recorded net asset balance of rio grande at december 1 , 2009 , was $ 22.7 million , consisting of cash of $ 3.1 million , $ 29.9 million in properties and equipment , net and $ 10.3 million in equity , representing bp , plc 2019s 30% ( 30 % ) noncontrolling interest . the following table provides income statement information related to hep 2019s discontinued operations : year ended december 31 , 2009 ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended december 31 2009 ( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>income from discontinued operations before income taxes</td><td>$ 5367</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>-942 ( 942 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income from discontinued operations net</td><td>4425</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gain on sale of discontinued operations before income taxes</td><td>14479</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>income tax expense</td><td>-1978 ( 1978 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>gain on sale of discontinued operations net</td><td>12501</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>income from discontinued operations net</td><td>$ 16926</td></tr></table> transportation agreements hep serves our refineries under long-term pipeline and terminal , tankage and throughput agreements expiring in 2019 through 2026 . under these agreements , we pay hep fees to transport , store and throughput volumes of refined product and crude oil on hep 2019s pipeline and terminal , tankage and loading rack facilities that result in minimum annual payments to hep . under these agreements , the agreed upon tariff rates are subject to annual tariff rate adjustments on july 1 at a rate based upon the percentage change in producer price index ( 201cppi 201d ) or federal energy .
Question: in the year of 2009, how much did the income tax expense represent in relation to the gain on sale of discontinued operations before income taxes?
Answer: 0.13661
Question: and what was the income from those discontinued operations, excluding that gain on sale after taxes?
| 4425.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
benefits as an increase to earnings of $ 152 million ( $ 0.50 per share ) during the year ended december 31 , 2016 . additionally , we recognized additional income tax benefits as an increase to operating cash flows of $ 152 million during the year ended december 31 , 2016 . the new accounting standard did not impact any periods prior to january 1 , 2016 , as we applied the changes in the asu on a prospective basis . in september 2015 , the fasb issued asu no . 2015-16 , business combinations ( topic 805 ) , which simplifies the accounting for adjustments made to preliminary amounts recognized in a business combination by eliminating the requirement to retrospectively account for those adjustments . instead , adjustments will be recognized in the period in which the adjustments are determined , including the effect on earnings of any amounts that would have been recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date . we adopted the asu on january 1 , 2016 and are prospectively applying the asu to business combination adjustments identified after the date of adoption . in november 2015 , the fasb issued asu no . 2015-17 , income taxes ( topic 740 ) , which simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes and requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities , as well as any related valuation allowance , be classified as noncurrent in our consolidated balance sheets . we applied the provisions of the asu retrospectively and reclassified approximately $ 1.6 billion from current to noncurrent assets and approximately $ 140 million from current to noncurrent liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2015 . note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations</td><td>299.3</td><td>310.3</td><td>316.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards</td><td>3.8</td><td>4.4</td><td>5.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for dilutedcomputations</td><td>303.1</td><td>314.7</td><td>322.4</td></tr></table> we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented . our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method . there were no anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 . note 3 2013 acquisitions and divestitures acquisitions acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation on november 6 , 2015 , we completed the acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation and certain affiliated companies ( collectively 201csikorsky 201d ) from united technologies corporation ( utc ) and certain of utc 2019s subsidiaries . the purchase price of the acquisition was $ 9.0 billion , net of cash acquired . as a result of the acquisition , sikorsky became a wholly- owned subsidiary of ours . sikorsky is a global company primarily engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture and support of military and commercial helicopters . sikorsky 2019s products include military helicopters such as the black hawk , seahawk , ch-53k , h-92 ; and commercial helicopters such as the s-76 and s-92 . the acquisition enables us to extend our core business into the military and commercial rotary wing markets , allowing us to strengthen our position in the aerospace and defense industry . further , this acquisition will expand our presence in commercial and international markets . sikorsky has been aligned under our rms business segment . to fund the $ 9.0 billion acquisition price , we utilized $ 6.0 billion of proceeds borrowed under a temporary 364-day revolving credit facility ( the 364-day facility ) , $ 2.0 billion of cash on hand and $ 1.0 billion from the issuance of commercial paper . in the fourth quarter of 2015 , we repaid all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility with the proceeds from the issuance of $ 7.0 billion of fixed interest-rate long-term notes in a public offering ( the november 2015 notes ) . in the fourth quarter of 2015 , we also repaid the $ 1.0 billion in commercial paper borrowings ( see 201cnote 10 2013 debt 201d ) . .
Question: what was the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations in 2016?
| 299.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
benefits as an increase to earnings of $ 152 million ( $ 0.50 per share ) during the year ended december 31 , 2016 . additionally , we recognized additional income tax benefits as an increase to operating cash flows of $ 152 million during the year ended december 31 , 2016 . the new accounting standard did not impact any periods prior to january 1 , 2016 , as we applied the changes in the asu on a prospective basis . in september 2015 , the fasb issued asu no . 2015-16 , business combinations ( topic 805 ) , which simplifies the accounting for adjustments made to preliminary amounts recognized in a business combination by eliminating the requirement to retrospectively account for those adjustments . instead , adjustments will be recognized in the period in which the adjustments are determined , including the effect on earnings of any amounts that would have been recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date . we adopted the asu on january 1 , 2016 and are prospectively applying the asu to business combination adjustments identified after the date of adoption . in november 2015 , the fasb issued asu no . 2015-17 , income taxes ( topic 740 ) , which simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes and requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities , as well as any related valuation allowance , be classified as noncurrent in our consolidated balance sheets . we applied the provisions of the asu retrospectively and reclassified approximately $ 1.6 billion from current to noncurrent assets and approximately $ 140 million from current to noncurrent liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2015 . note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations</td><td>299.3</td><td>310.3</td><td>316.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards</td><td>3.8</td><td>4.4</td><td>5.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for dilutedcomputations</td><td>303.1</td><td>314.7</td><td>322.4</td></tr></table> we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented . our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method . there were no anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 . note 3 2013 acquisitions and divestitures acquisitions acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation on november 6 , 2015 , we completed the acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation and certain affiliated companies ( collectively 201csikorsky 201d ) from united technologies corporation ( utc ) and certain of utc 2019s subsidiaries . the purchase price of the acquisition was $ 9.0 billion , net of cash acquired . as a result of the acquisition , sikorsky became a wholly- owned subsidiary of ours . sikorsky is a global company primarily engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture and support of military and commercial helicopters . sikorsky 2019s products include military helicopters such as the black hawk , seahawk , ch-53k , h-92 ; and commercial helicopters such as the s-76 and s-92 . the acquisition enables us to extend our core business into the military and commercial rotary wing markets , allowing us to strengthen our position in the aerospace and defense industry . further , this acquisition will expand our presence in commercial and international markets . sikorsky has been aligned under our rms business segment . to fund the $ 9.0 billion acquisition price , we utilized $ 6.0 billion of proceeds borrowed under a temporary 364-day revolving credit facility ( the 364-day facility ) , $ 2.0 billion of cash on hand and $ 1.0 billion from the issuance of commercial paper . in the fourth quarter of 2015 , we repaid all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility with the proceeds from the issuance of $ 7.0 billion of fixed interest-rate long-term notes in a public offering ( the november 2015 notes ) . in the fourth quarter of 2015 , we also repaid the $ 1.0 billion in commercial paper borrowings ( see 201cnote 10 2013 debt 201d ) . .
Question: what was the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations in 2016?
Answer: 299.3
Question: and in 2015?
| 310.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
benefits as an increase to earnings of $ 152 million ( $ 0.50 per share ) during the year ended december 31 , 2016 . additionally , we recognized additional income tax benefits as an increase to operating cash flows of $ 152 million during the year ended december 31 , 2016 . the new accounting standard did not impact any periods prior to january 1 , 2016 , as we applied the changes in the asu on a prospective basis . in september 2015 , the fasb issued asu no . 2015-16 , business combinations ( topic 805 ) , which simplifies the accounting for adjustments made to preliminary amounts recognized in a business combination by eliminating the requirement to retrospectively account for those adjustments . instead , adjustments will be recognized in the period in which the adjustments are determined , including the effect on earnings of any amounts that would have been recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date . we adopted the asu on january 1 , 2016 and are prospectively applying the asu to business combination adjustments identified after the date of adoption . in november 2015 , the fasb issued asu no . 2015-17 , income taxes ( topic 740 ) , which simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes and requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities , as well as any related valuation allowance , be classified as noncurrent in our consolidated balance sheets . we applied the provisions of the asu retrospectively and reclassified approximately $ 1.6 billion from current to noncurrent assets and approximately $ 140 million from current to noncurrent liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2015 . note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations</td><td>299.3</td><td>310.3</td><td>316.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards</td><td>3.8</td><td>4.4</td><td>5.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for dilutedcomputations</td><td>303.1</td><td>314.7</td><td>322.4</td></tr></table> we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented . our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method . there were no anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 . note 3 2013 acquisitions and divestitures acquisitions acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation on november 6 , 2015 , we completed the acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation and certain affiliated companies ( collectively 201csikorsky 201d ) from united technologies corporation ( utc ) and certain of utc 2019s subsidiaries . the purchase price of the acquisition was $ 9.0 billion , net of cash acquired . as a result of the acquisition , sikorsky became a wholly- owned subsidiary of ours . sikorsky is a global company primarily engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture and support of military and commercial helicopters . sikorsky 2019s products include military helicopters such as the black hawk , seahawk , ch-53k , h-92 ; and commercial helicopters such as the s-76 and s-92 . the acquisition enables us to extend our core business into the military and commercial rotary wing markets , allowing us to strengthen our position in the aerospace and defense industry . further , this acquisition will expand our presence in commercial and international markets . sikorsky has been aligned under our rms business segment . to fund the $ 9.0 billion acquisition price , we utilized $ 6.0 billion of proceeds borrowed under a temporary 364-day revolving credit facility ( the 364-day facility ) , $ 2.0 billion of cash on hand and $ 1.0 billion from the issuance of commercial paper . in the fourth quarter of 2015 , we repaid all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility with the proceeds from the issuance of $ 7.0 billion of fixed interest-rate long-term notes in a public offering ( the november 2015 notes ) . in the fourth quarter of 2015 , we also repaid the $ 1.0 billion in commercial paper borrowings ( see 201cnote 10 2013 debt 201d ) . .
Question: what was the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations in 2016?
Answer: 299.3
Question: and in 2015?
Answer: 310.3
Question: what is the difference between the two years?
| -11.0 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
benefits as an increase to earnings of $ 152 million ( $ 0.50 per share ) during the year ended december 31 , 2016 . additionally , we recognized additional income tax benefits as an increase to operating cash flows of $ 152 million during the year ended december 31 , 2016 . the new accounting standard did not impact any periods prior to january 1 , 2016 , as we applied the changes in the asu on a prospective basis . in september 2015 , the fasb issued asu no . 2015-16 , business combinations ( topic 805 ) , which simplifies the accounting for adjustments made to preliminary amounts recognized in a business combination by eliminating the requirement to retrospectively account for those adjustments . instead , adjustments will be recognized in the period in which the adjustments are determined , including the effect on earnings of any amounts that would have been recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date . we adopted the asu on january 1 , 2016 and are prospectively applying the asu to business combination adjustments identified after the date of adoption . in november 2015 , the fasb issued asu no . 2015-17 , income taxes ( topic 740 ) , which simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes and requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities , as well as any related valuation allowance , be classified as noncurrent in our consolidated balance sheets . we applied the provisions of the asu retrospectively and reclassified approximately $ 1.6 billion from current to noncurrent assets and approximately $ 140 million from current to noncurrent liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2015 . note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations</td><td>299.3</td><td>310.3</td><td>316.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards</td><td>3.8</td><td>4.4</td><td>5.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for dilutedcomputations</td><td>303.1</td><td>314.7</td><td>322.4</td></tr></table> we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented . our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method . there were no anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 . note 3 2013 acquisitions and divestitures acquisitions acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation on november 6 , 2015 , we completed the acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation and certain affiliated companies ( collectively 201csikorsky 201d ) from united technologies corporation ( utc ) and certain of utc 2019s subsidiaries . the purchase price of the acquisition was $ 9.0 billion , net of cash acquired . as a result of the acquisition , sikorsky became a wholly- owned subsidiary of ours . sikorsky is a global company primarily engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture and support of military and commercial helicopters . sikorsky 2019s products include military helicopters such as the black hawk , seahawk , ch-53k , h-92 ; and commercial helicopters such as the s-76 and s-92 . the acquisition enables us to extend our core business into the military and commercial rotary wing markets , allowing us to strengthen our position in the aerospace and defense industry . further , this acquisition will expand our presence in commercial and international markets . sikorsky has been aligned under our rms business segment . to fund the $ 9.0 billion acquisition price , we utilized $ 6.0 billion of proceeds borrowed under a temporary 364-day revolving credit facility ( the 364-day facility ) , $ 2.0 billion of cash on hand and $ 1.0 billion from the issuance of commercial paper . in the fourth quarter of 2015 , we repaid all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility with the proceeds from the issuance of $ 7.0 billion of fixed interest-rate long-term notes in a public offering ( the november 2015 notes ) . in the fourth quarter of 2015 , we also repaid the $ 1.0 billion in commercial paper borrowings ( see 201cnote 10 2013 debt 201d ) . .
Question: what was the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations in 2016?
Answer: 299.3
Question: and in 2015?
Answer: 310.3
Question: what is the difference between the two years?
Answer: -11.0
Question: and the specific value for 2015 again?
| 310.3 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
benefits as an increase to earnings of $ 152 million ( $ 0.50 per share ) during the year ended december 31 , 2016 . additionally , we recognized additional income tax benefits as an increase to operating cash flows of $ 152 million during the year ended december 31 , 2016 . the new accounting standard did not impact any periods prior to january 1 , 2016 , as we applied the changes in the asu on a prospective basis . in september 2015 , the fasb issued asu no . 2015-16 , business combinations ( topic 805 ) , which simplifies the accounting for adjustments made to preliminary amounts recognized in a business combination by eliminating the requirement to retrospectively account for those adjustments . instead , adjustments will be recognized in the period in which the adjustments are determined , including the effect on earnings of any amounts that would have been recorded in previous periods if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date . we adopted the asu on january 1 , 2016 and are prospectively applying the asu to business combination adjustments identified after the date of adoption . in november 2015 , the fasb issued asu no . 2015-17 , income taxes ( topic 740 ) , which simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes and requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities , as well as any related valuation allowance , be classified as noncurrent in our consolidated balance sheets . we applied the provisions of the asu retrospectively and reclassified approximately $ 1.6 billion from current to noncurrent assets and approximately $ 140 million from current to noncurrent liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2015 . note 2 2013 earnings per share the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute earnings per common share were as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations</td><td>299.3</td><td>310.3</td><td>316.8</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted average dilutive effect of equity awards</td><td>3.8</td><td>4.4</td><td>5.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted average common shares outstanding for dilutedcomputations</td><td>303.1</td><td>314.7</td><td>322.4</td></tr></table> we compute basic and diluted earnings per common share by dividing net earnings by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the periods presented . our calculation of diluted earnings per common share also includes the dilutive effects for the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units and exercise of outstanding stock options based on the treasury stock method . there were no anti-dilutive equity awards for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 . note 3 2013 acquisitions and divestitures acquisitions acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation on november 6 , 2015 , we completed the acquisition of sikorsky aircraft corporation and certain affiliated companies ( collectively 201csikorsky 201d ) from united technologies corporation ( utc ) and certain of utc 2019s subsidiaries . the purchase price of the acquisition was $ 9.0 billion , net of cash acquired . as a result of the acquisition , sikorsky became a wholly- owned subsidiary of ours . sikorsky is a global company primarily engaged in the research , design , development , manufacture and support of military and commercial helicopters . sikorsky 2019s products include military helicopters such as the black hawk , seahawk , ch-53k , h-92 ; and commercial helicopters such as the s-76 and s-92 . the acquisition enables us to extend our core business into the military and commercial rotary wing markets , allowing us to strengthen our position in the aerospace and defense industry . further , this acquisition will expand our presence in commercial and international markets . sikorsky has been aligned under our rms business segment . to fund the $ 9.0 billion acquisition price , we utilized $ 6.0 billion of proceeds borrowed under a temporary 364-day revolving credit facility ( the 364-day facility ) , $ 2.0 billion of cash on hand and $ 1.0 billion from the issuance of commercial paper . in the fourth quarter of 2015 , we repaid all outstanding borrowings under the 364-day facility with the proceeds from the issuance of $ 7.0 billion of fixed interest-rate long-term notes in a public offering ( the november 2015 notes ) . in the fourth quarter of 2015 , we also repaid the $ 1.0 billion in commercial paper borrowings ( see 201cnote 10 2013 debt 201d ) . .
Question: what was the weighted average common shares outstanding for basic computations in 2016?
Answer: 299.3
Question: and in 2015?
Answer: 310.3
Question: what is the difference between the two years?
Answer: -11.0
Question: and the specific value for 2015 again?
Answer: 310.3
Question: so what was the change as a percentage of the original value?
| -0.03545 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) corporate and other expenses increased slightly during 2013 by $ 3.5 to $ 140.8 compared to 2012 , primarily due to an increase in salaries and related expenses , mainly attributable to higher base salaries , benefits and temporary help , partially offset by lower severance expenses and a decrease in office and general expenses . liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flow data</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1</td><td>$ 831.2</td><td>$ 598.4</td><td>$ 697.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used in working capital b2</td><td>-131.1 ( 131.1 )</td><td>-9.6 ( 9.6 )</td><td>-293.2 ( 293.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash</td><td>-30.6 ( 30.6 )</td><td>4.1</td><td>-46.8 ( 46.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 669.5</td><td>$ 592.9</td><td>$ 357.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-200.8 ( 200.8 )</td><td>-224.5 ( 224.5 )</td><td>-210.2 ( 210.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities</td><td>-343.9 ( 343.9 )</td><td>-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )</td><td>131.3</td></tr></table> 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 . due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters . our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses . net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income . the improvement in working capital in 2013 was impacted by our media businesses and an ongoing focus on working capital management at our agencies . the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow . in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients . to the extent possible we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients . the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers . our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments . for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year . investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .
Question: what was the cash provided by operating activities?
| 669.5 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) corporate and other expenses increased slightly during 2013 by $ 3.5 to $ 140.8 compared to 2012 , primarily due to an increase in salaries and related expenses , mainly attributable to higher base salaries , benefits and temporary help , partially offset by lower severance expenses and a decrease in office and general expenses . liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flow data</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1</td><td>$ 831.2</td><td>$ 598.4</td><td>$ 697.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used in working capital b2</td><td>-131.1 ( 131.1 )</td><td>-9.6 ( 9.6 )</td><td>-293.2 ( 293.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash</td><td>-30.6 ( 30.6 )</td><td>4.1</td><td>-46.8 ( 46.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 669.5</td><td>$ 592.9</td><td>$ 357.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-200.8 ( 200.8 )</td><td>-224.5 ( 224.5 )</td><td>-210.2 ( 210.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities</td><td>-343.9 ( 343.9 )</td><td>-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )</td><td>131.3</td></tr></table> 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 . due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters . our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses . net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income . the improvement in working capital in 2013 was impacted by our media businesses and an ongoing focus on working capital management at our agencies . the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow . in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients . to the extent possible we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients . the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers . our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments . for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year . investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .
Question: what was the cash provided by operating activities?
Answer: 669.5
Question: what was the cash used for investing activities?
| -200.8 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) corporate and other expenses increased slightly during 2013 by $ 3.5 to $ 140.8 compared to 2012 , primarily due to an increase in salaries and related expenses , mainly attributable to higher base salaries , benefits and temporary help , partially offset by lower severance expenses and a decrease in office and general expenses . liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flow data</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1</td><td>$ 831.2</td><td>$ 598.4</td><td>$ 697.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used in working capital b2</td><td>-131.1 ( 131.1 )</td><td>-9.6 ( 9.6 )</td><td>-293.2 ( 293.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash</td><td>-30.6 ( 30.6 )</td><td>4.1</td><td>-46.8 ( 46.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 669.5</td><td>$ 592.9</td><td>$ 357.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-200.8 ( 200.8 )</td><td>-224.5 ( 224.5 )</td><td>-210.2 ( 210.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities</td><td>-343.9 ( 343.9 )</td><td>-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )</td><td>131.3</td></tr></table> 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 . due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters . our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses . net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income . the improvement in working capital in 2013 was impacted by our media businesses and an ongoing focus on working capital management at our agencies . the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow . in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients . to the extent possible we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients . the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers . our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments . for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year . investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .
Question: what was the cash provided by operating activities?
Answer: 669.5
Question: what was the cash used for investing activities?
Answer: -200.8
Question: what is the sum?
| 468.7 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) corporate and other expenses increased slightly during 2013 by $ 3.5 to $ 140.8 compared to 2012 , primarily due to an increase in salaries and related expenses , mainly attributable to higher base salaries , benefits and temporary help , partially offset by lower severance expenses and a decrease in office and general expenses . liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>cash flow data</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2014</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2013</td><td>years ended december 31 , 2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net income adjusted to reconcile net income to net cashprovided by operating activities1</td><td>$ 831.2</td><td>$ 598.4</td><td>$ 697.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net cash used in working capital b2</td><td>-131.1 ( 131.1 )</td><td>-9.6 ( 9.6 )</td><td>-293.2 ( 293.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>changes in other non-current assets and liabilities using cash</td><td>-30.6 ( 30.6 )</td><td>4.1</td><td>-46.8 ( 46.8 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 669.5</td><td>$ 592.9</td><td>$ 357.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net cash used in investing activities</td><td>-200.8 ( 200.8 )</td><td>-224.5 ( 224.5 )</td><td>-210.2 ( 210.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>net cash ( used in ) provided by financing activities</td><td>-343.9 ( 343.9 )</td><td>-1212.3 ( 1212.3 )</td><td>131.3</td></tr></table> 1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , non-cash ( gain ) loss related to early extinguishment of debt , and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities net cash provided by operating activities during 2014 was $ 669.5 , which was an improvement of $ 76.6 as compared to 2013 , primarily as a result of an increase in net income , offset by an increase in working capital usage of $ 121.5 . due to the seasonality of our business , we typically generate cash from working capital in the second half of a year and use cash from working capital in the first half of a year , with the largest impacts in the first and fourth quarters . our net working capital usage in 2014 was impacted by our media businesses . net cash provided by operating activities during 2013 was $ 592.9 , which was an increase of $ 235.7 as compared to 2012 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 283.6 , offset by a decrease in net income . the improvement in working capital in 2013 was impacted by our media businesses and an ongoing focus on working capital management at our agencies . the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients affects our working capital and operating cash flow . in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients . to the extent possible we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients . the amounts involved substantially exceed our revenues and primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , expenditures billable to clients , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers . our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments . for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year . investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2014 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 148.7 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 67.8 related to acquisitions completed during 2014 , net of cash acquired. .
Question: what was the cash provided by operating activities?
Answer: 669.5
Question: what was the cash used for investing activities?
Answer: -200.8
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 468.7
Question: what is the sum including financing activities?
| 124.8 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|
interest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.2 million , $ 0.8 million , and $ 0.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 6 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2016 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2016 as well as significant operating lease agreements entered into during the period after december 31 , 2016 through the date of this report : ( in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 114857</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2018</td><td>127504</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2019</td><td>136040</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2020</td><td>133092</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2021</td><td>122753</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2022 and thereafter</td><td>788180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 1422426</td></tr></table> included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements . included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . sports marketing and other commitments within the normal course of business , the company enters into contractual commitments in order to promote the company 2019s brand and products . these commitments include sponsorship agreements with teams and athletes on the collegiate and professional levels , official supplier agreements , athletic event sponsorships and other marketing commitments . the following is a schedule of the company 2019s future minimum payments under its sponsorship and other marketing agreements as of december 31 .
Question: what is the interest expense in 2016?
| 26.4 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
|