Datasets:

ELVISIO
/

incorrect_triplet

Dataset card Viewer Files Files and versions Community

Split (1)

train · 558 rows

doc_regexclean01 stringlengths 126 1.04k	anchor stringlengths 126 1.04k	positive stringclasses 2 values	negative stringclasses 2 values
i never thought an old cartoon would bring tears to my eyes. when i first purchased casper and friends represent spooking about africa and i so much wanted to see the very first casper cartoon entitled the friendly ghost (1945) and but when i saw the next cartoon and there good boos to night (1948) and it made me break down. i couldn not believe how sad and tragic it was after seeing casper fox get killed. i never saw anything like that in the other casper cartoons. this is the saddest one of all. it was so depressing and i just couldn not watch it again. it just like seeing lassie die at the end of a movie. i know it a classic and but it too much for us old cartoon fans to handle like me. if i wanted to watch something old and classic and i rather watch something happy and funny. but when i think about this casper cartoon and i think about my cats.	i never thought an old cartoon would bring tears to my eyes. when i first purchased casper and friends represent spooking about africa and i so much wanted to see the very first casper cartoon entitled the friendly ghost (1945) and but when i saw the next cartoon and there good boos to night (1948) and it made me break down. i couldn not believe how sad and tragic it was after seeing casper fox get killed. i never saw anything like that in the other casper cartoons. this is the saddest one of all. it was so depressing and i just couldn not watch it again. it just like seeing lassie die at the end of a movie. i know it a classic and but it too much for us old cartoon fans to handle like me. if i wanted to watch something old and classic and i rather watch something happy and funny. but when i think about this casper cartoon and i think about my cats.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
i saw his movie in dallas and texas when it came out in 1986. i remember them giving out prizes for showing up to see the movie. after seeing the movie i can see why. the movie was not bad and nor was it great. the problem with this movie was that it tried to tell a side story. they created a new story and new characters and tried to wrap it around the masters saga. my biggest complaint is that the plot is about a second wave of robotech masters attacking the earth. they even used the same scenes from the master saga but with different dialogue. as a kid and i loved the movie. but unfortunately i haven not seen it as an adult and can not give a better review. looking back i was disappointed but now i would love to see the movie and re evaluate my stance on it. that being said and will someone please release this movie for the whole world to judge. i love robotech and can not wait for the shadows chronicles.	i saw his movie in dallas and texas when it came out in 1986. i remember them giving out prizes for showing up to see the movie. after seeing the movie i can see why. the movie was not bad and nor was it great. the problem with this movie was that it tried to tell a side story. they created a new story and new characters and tried to wrap it around the masters saga. my biggest complaint is that the plot is about a second wave of robotech masters attacking the earth. they even used the same scenes from the master saga but with different dialogue. as a kid and i loved the movie. but unfortunately i haven not seen it as an adult and can not give a better review. looking back i was disappointed but now i would love to see the movie and re evaluate my stance on it. that being said and will someone please release this movie for the whole world to judge. i love robotech and can not wait for the shadows chronicles.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
wizards of the lost kingdom is a movie about a young prince (simon) who is banished from his kingdom due to his father (the king) being killed by the cliche evil adviser. this movie about simon adventures. the special effects and plot and acting and and generally everything about this movie is bad. however and it so bad that it funny. you will keep watching this movie simply because it so bad it funny and and and like the other reviewer of the movie said and it so bad it good.	wizards of the lost kingdom is a movie about a young prince (simon) who is banished from his kingdom due to his father (the king) being killed by the cliche evil adviser. this movie about simon adventures. the special effects and plot and acting and and generally everything about this movie is bad. however and it so bad that it funny. you will keep watching this movie simply because it so bad it funny and and and like the other reviewer of the movie said and it so bad it good.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
they filmed this movie out on long island and where i grew up. my brother and his girlfriend were extras in this movie. apparently there is some party scene where they are all drinking beer and (which they told me was colored water and tasted disgusting and and was very hard to keep swallowing over and over again and especially in the funnel scenes). yet none of us ever heard of the movie being released anywhere in any form. it never came out in the theaters (obviously) and it and as far as i knew and was never released on video and and i am sure wasn not released on dvd. yet it looks like it was seen by some people and albeit it probably very few. so there must be something. i would absolutely love to purchase this for my brother and yet there is no way i can find it anywhere. does anybody know anything about when or where or how this movie could be purchased. and which format that would be.	they filmed this movie out on long island and where i grew up. my brother and his girlfriend were extras in this movie. apparently there is some party scene where they are all drinking beer and (which they told me was colored water and tasted disgusting and and was very hard to keep swallowing over and over again and especially in the funnel scenes). yet none of us ever heard of the movie being released anywhere in any form. it never came out in the theaters (obviously) and it and as far as i knew and was never released on video and and i am sure wasn not released on dvd. yet it looks like it was seen by some people and albeit it probably very few. so there must be something. i would absolutely love to purchase this for my brother and yet there is no way i can find it anywhere. does anybody know anything about when or where or how this movie could be purchased. and which format that would be.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
whether it a good movie or not and films of this kind has to be made and i think. it remembers me of i love huckabees and a overwhelmingly puzzling movie with isabelle huppert being sodomized by a young american in a mud pond and in a merry sadistic masochist way (. ). i hope the director will go on stepping across the border and as though i felt the choices vincenzo natali made and were not always subtle (some of the scenes were unhappily kind of tarte à la crème and like a childish slapstick) and speaking about script and cinematography the color of cube was black and nothing is white and more cheerful and surprisingly and than the former films of natali.	whether it a good movie or not and films of this kind has to be made and i think. it remembers me of i love huckabees and a overwhelmingly puzzling movie with isabelle huppert being sodomized by a young american in a mud pond and in a merry sadistic masochist way (. ). i hope the director will go on stepping across the border and as though i felt the choices vincenzo natali made and were not always subtle (some of the scenes were unhappily kind of tarte à la crème and like a childish slapstick) and speaking about script and cinematography the color of cube was black and nothing is white and more cheerful and surprisingly and than the former films of natali.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
not the most successful television project john cleese ever did and strange case has the feel of a first draft that was rushed into production before any revisions could be made. there are some silly ideas throughout and even a few clever ones and but the story as a whole unfortunately doesn not add up to much. arthur lowe is a hoot and though and as dr. watson and bionic bits and all. good lord.	not the most successful television project john cleese ever did and strange case has the feel of a first draft that was rushed into production before any revisions could be made. there are some silly ideas throughout and even a few clever ones and but the story as a whole unfortunately doesn not add up to much. arthur lowe is a hoot and though and as dr. watson and bionic bits and all. good lord.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
this game show lasted just one season and but was intriguing to audiences because it required visual aptitude and a steady hand. one false move would disqualify the contestant from winning the prize and even though it was clear the contestant knew the correct answer. it was always exciting as the contestant began drawing and wondering if they would complete the drawing or be buzzed out while allowing the other contestant to easily win the contest. it was a light hearted show and but it was clear that the contestants were often times embarrassed from a silly mistake made unintentionally. rarely seen and the game show did not survive past one single season. only a seasoned game show addict will remember this show and as it proved to be quite unpopular and even though game shows were making a big return to the tv screen after the scandals of the 1950 game shows. but it was a unique concept for a game show and and one that has as yet never been seen again.	this game show lasted just one season and but was intriguing to audiences because it required visual aptitude and a steady hand. one false move would disqualify the contestant from winning the prize and even though it was clear the contestant knew the correct answer. it was always exciting as the contestant began drawing and wondering if they would complete the drawing or be buzzed out while allowing the other contestant to easily win the contest. it was a light hearted show and but it was clear that the contestants were often times embarrassed from a silly mistake made unintentionally. rarely seen and the game show did not survive past one single season. only a seasoned game show addict will remember this show and as it proved to be quite unpopular and even though game shows were making a big return to the tv screen after the scandals of the 1950 game shows. but it was a unique concept for a game show and and one that has as yet never been seen again.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
no other movie has made me feel like this before. and i do not feel bad. like and i do not want my money back or the time that i waited to watch this movie (9 months) nor do i feel bad about using two hours of a sunny summer day in order to view this ______. the reason i say _____ is because no matter how hard i wrack my brain i just can not seem to come up with a word in any of the seven languages that movie was in to sum it up. i have no idea what was going on the entire time and half way through the movie i needed a breather. no movie has ever done this to me before. never in my life have i wanted cauliflower and milk and and baguettes this much. thank you. eduh. clears throat no words. no thoughts. i do not know. i truly do not know. cait.	no other movie has made me feel like this before. and i do not feel bad. like and i do not want my money back or the time that i waited to watch this movie (9 months) nor do i feel bad about using two hours of a sunny summer day in order to view this ______. the reason i say _____ is because no matter how hard i wrack my brain i just can not seem to come up with a word in any of the seven languages that movie was in to sum it up. i have no idea what was going on the entire time and half way through the movie i needed a breather. no movie has ever done this to me before. never in my life have i wanted cauliflower and milk and and baguettes this much. thank you. eduh. clears throat no words. no thoughts. i do not know. i truly do not know. cait.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
who ever came up with story is one sick person. i rented it for our slumber party sleepover and all six of us got freaked out cause were all in an acting class together and and we know a couple of the actors from class. besides everybody screaming the whole freaky night and i had freaky nightmares. i kept thinking oh my god and if i get up to go to the bathroom to pee i am going to be stabbed in the middle of wiping or something. i couldn not even go to the bathroom because we watched this gruesome horror movie. i also thought why are all the girls topless in this movie but we do not any of the boys units. you should make a horror film where the killer is a girl and chopping off units. i would watch that over and over. call it hard or soft or something stupid like that. i am only giving this movie a 9 because you freaked me out freaks.	who ever came up with story is one sick person. i rented it for our slumber party sleepover and all six of us got freaked out cause were all in an acting class together and and we know a couple of the actors from class. besides everybody screaming the whole freaky night and i had freaky nightmares. i kept thinking oh my god and if i get up to go to the bathroom to pee i am going to be stabbed in the middle of wiping or something. i couldn not even go to the bathroom because we watched this gruesome horror movie. i also thought why are all the girls topless in this movie but we do not any of the boys units. you should make a horror film where the killer is a girl and chopping off units. i would watch that over and over. call it hard or soft or something stupid like that. i am only giving this movie a 9 because you freaked me out freaks.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
well it was a nice surprise after all. its trailer did not predict a good film at all and it was even a bit misleading. especially the part of jeff bridges was a positive surprise and well written and sardonic and funny. less real though and i do not think a guy who got where he got would show signs of such irreverence towards everything that his current company stands for. one does not become a top suit just to doubt it all suddenly again. the ending of the film and during the showing of dolce vita and was too corny and cliché and quite disappointing. and of course a guy like pegg character would not last past his first week in a blitz new york magazine like this. i hope one day i will see a decent role written for megan fox and here she looked a poor actress playing a bimbo. and by the way and i do not see why she is the sex symbol of the year and i see hotter girls on nearly every cover of every magazine.	well it was a nice surprise after all. its trailer did not predict a good film at all and it was even a bit misleading. especially the part of jeff bridges was a positive surprise and well written and sardonic and funny. less real though and i do not think a guy who got where he got would show signs of such irreverence towards everything that his current company stands for. one does not become a top suit just to doubt it all suddenly again. the ending of the film and during the showing of dolce vita and was too corny and cliché and quite disappointing. and of course a guy like pegg character would not last past his first week in a blitz new york magazine like this. i hope one day i will see a decent role written for megan fox and here she looked a poor actress playing a bimbo. and by the way and i do not see why she is the sex symbol of the year and i see hotter girls on nearly every cover of every magazine.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
this musical is decidedly mixed and and none of the elements really fit together and but it somehow manages to be mostly enjoyable. the plot contains some of the elements of wodehouse novel and but none of its virtues and though he co wrote the script. the songs and though charming and have nothing to do with this particular film and and are unusually crudely squeezed into the plot and even by pre oklahoma standards. burns and allen do their usual shtick quite competently and but it misses the tone of the rest of the film by about forty iq points. there are a few high points. reginald gardiner does good work when he remembers that this is a talkie and and stops mugging like a silent actor. and there are a few bits of writing which could only have been written by wodehouse and though most of the film feels like the production of one of the hollywood meetings he later parodied.	this musical is decidedly mixed and and none of the elements really fit together and but it somehow manages to be mostly enjoyable. the plot contains some of the elements of wodehouse novel and but none of its virtues and though he co wrote the script. the songs and though charming and have nothing to do with this particular film and and are unusually crudely squeezed into the plot and even by pre oklahoma standards. burns and allen do their usual shtick quite competently and but it misses the tone of the rest of the film by about forty iq points. there are a few high points. reginald gardiner does good work when he remembers that this is a talkie and and stops mugging like a silent actor. and there are a few bits of writing which could only have been written by wodehouse and though most of the film feels like the production of one of the hollywood meetings he later parodied.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
just two comments. seven years apart. hardly evidence of the film relentless pulling power. as has been mentioned and the low budget telemovie status of 13 gantry row is a mitigating factor in its limited appeal. having said that however the thing is not without merit either as entertainment or as a fright outing per se. true and the plot at its most basic is a re working of the amityville horror only without much horror. more a case of intrigue. gibney might have made a more worthwhile impression if she had played halifax investigating a couple of seemingly unconnected murders with the house as the main suspect. the script is better than average and the production overall of a high standard. it just fails to engage the viewer particularly at key moments. having picked the dvd up for a mere $3. 95 last week at my regular video store and i cannot begrudge the expenditure. $10. 95 would be an acceptable price for the film. just do not expect fireworks.	just two comments. seven years apart. hardly evidence of the film relentless pulling power. as has been mentioned and the low budget telemovie status of 13 gantry row is a mitigating factor in its limited appeal. having said that however the thing is not without merit either as entertainment or as a fright outing per se. true and the plot at its most basic is a re working of the amityville horror only without much horror. more a case of intrigue. gibney might have made a more worthwhile impression if she had played halifax investigating a couple of seemingly unconnected murders with the house as the main suspect. the script is better than average and the production overall of a high standard. it just fails to engage the viewer particularly at key moments. having picked the dvd up for a mere $3. 95 last week at my regular video store and i cannot begrudge the expenditure. $10. 95 would be an acceptable price for the film. just do not expect fireworks.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
a series of vignettes and most of them spoofing television of the 1970 and but also with some digs at the government and corporate america. one of the longest segments and the dealers is not that funny to me and i do not know what it is parodying. some of the others and though and are absolutely side splitting. i particularly enjoy the cooking show segment. most of the foul words i know are used in the movie and and and if you object to full frontal nudity and stay away.	a series of vignettes and most of them spoofing television of the 1970 and but also with some digs at the government and corporate america. one of the longest segments and the dealers is not that funny to me and i do not know what it is parodying. some of the others and though and are absolutely side splitting. i particularly enjoy the cooking show segment. most of the foul words i know are used in the movie and and and if you object to full frontal nudity and stay away.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
this show has all the typical characters in a comedy represent the good guy and the idiot and the pervert and the rich girl. but it set on the 70 . that the only difference that it has with other tv comedies. i do not know how you can like this show. its humor is pathetic. i mean and the jokes are so direct. a typical dialog is this represent fez represent oh and jackie i want to have sex with you. (audience laughs) jackie represent fez youre a pervert. (audience laughs) fez represent oh yes i am. (audience cheers and applauds) this isn not funny. i think that if it do not have those laughs (i do not know how you call that in english and sorry) you do not laugh at all. this isn not intelligent comedy and this is an insult to the public. i like most of the american comedies and but this isn not good at all. i would give it negative . (sorry for my poor english again. ).	this show has all the typical characters in a comedy represent the good guy and the idiot and the pervert and the rich girl. but it set on the 70 . that the only difference that it has with other tv comedies. i do not know how you can like this show. its humor is pathetic. i mean and the jokes are so direct. a typical dialog is this represent fez represent oh and jackie i want to have sex with you. (audience laughs) jackie represent fez youre a pervert. (audience laughs) fez represent oh yes i am. (audience cheers and applauds) this isn not funny. i think that if it do not have those laughs (i do not know how you call that in english and sorry) you do not laugh at all. this isn not intelligent comedy and this is an insult to the public. i like most of the american comedies and but this isn not good at all. i would give it negative . (sorry for my poor english again. ).	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
fair drama or love story movie that focuses on the lives of blue collar people finding new life thru new love. the acting here is good but the film fails in cinematography and screenplay and directing and editing. the story or script is only average at best. this film will be enjoyed by fonda and de niro fans and by people who love middle age love stories where in the coartship is on a more wiser and cautious level. it would also be interesting for people who are interested on the subject matter regarding illiteracy.	fair drama or love story movie that focuses on the lives of blue collar people finding new life thru new love. the acting here is good but the film fails in cinematography and screenplay and directing and editing. the story or script is only average at best. this film will be enjoyed by fonda and de niro fans and by people who love middle age love stories where in the coartship is on a more wiser and cautious level. it would also be interesting for people who are interested on the subject matter regarding illiteracy.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
when an orphanage manager goes on vacation and his father takes over the details of the center and winds up renting the kids. when a well off and got it made couple with a nice apartment and great life get the notion to adopt this idea was tailor made for them. why would they want to spoil their elegant existence with a trio of hairbrained carpet creepers. no way would people like these two need kids to make life wonderful. this movie makes it look like the real world works this way and but i am the picture of dubiety.	when an orphanage manager goes on vacation and his father takes over the details of the center and winds up renting the kids. when a well off and got it made couple with a nice apartment and great life get the notion to adopt this idea was tailor made for them. why would they want to spoil their elegant existence with a trio of hairbrained carpet creepers. no way would people like these two need kids to make life wonderful. this movie makes it look like the real world works this way and but i am the picture of dubiety.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
actually i liked this movie very and very much. not because of it plot and acting and jokes and no. i liked it and because it one of the worse movies ever created. it so lame and so bad and that it becomes terribly funny. some jokes are actually cool and but the rest makes me pray for unemployment for the scriptwriter. men in white are so dumb and stupid and that you can do only two things. turn the tv off or roll on the floor laughing (beer helps a lotpositive. i chose the second option.	actually i liked this movie very and very much. not because of it plot and acting and jokes and no. i liked it and because it one of the worse movies ever created. it so lame and so bad and that it becomes terribly funny. some jokes are actually cool and but the rest makes me pray for unemployment for the scriptwriter. men in white are so dumb and stupid and that you can do only two things. turn the tv off or roll on the floor laughing (beer helps a lotpositive. i chose the second option.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
in the white balloon and crimson gold and the two other films by jafar panahi that i have seen and the director mines surprising amounts of depth in subjects that seem and on the surface and slight. in offside and panahi seriocomic tribute to iranian women standing up for their rights and i do not think he as successful. not that what he saying isn not important and of course (and it too bad that and like pretty much every other panahi film and iranians can not see it). but and after a while and the film feels a tad flat and and it feels long even at 90 minutes. not saying i do not like it and though. the actors are all fantastic and and the celebration at the end of the film is infectious. but it not an important work and in my opinion.	in the white balloon and crimson gold and the two other films by jafar panahi that i have seen and the director mines surprising amounts of depth in subjects that seem and on the surface and slight. in offside and panahi seriocomic tribute to iranian women standing up for their rights and i do not think he as successful. not that what he saying isn not important and of course (and it too bad that and like pretty much every other panahi film and iranians can not see it). but and after a while and the film feels a tad flat and and it feels long even at 90 minutes. not saying i do not like it and though. the actors are all fantastic and and the celebration at the end of the film is infectious. but it not an important work and in my opinion.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
cat soup has two hello kitty type kittens embarking on a bizarre trip through the afterlife and where anything can happen and and does. this mind tripping asian short uses no dialog and substituting word balloons instead. there is no way of describing this demented cartoon except to tell you to see it for yourself. and make sure no one under 10 is in the room. dismemberment and cannibalism and cruelty and savagery and sudden death and callous disregard for others are common themes. honest. perhaps the most memorable image is that of an elephant composed of water that the kitties swim through and in and and also ride. but like practically everything else in this film and that silly and picaresque interlude soon comes to a horrible end.	cat soup has two hello kitty type kittens embarking on a bizarre trip through the afterlife and where anything can happen and and does. this mind tripping asian short uses no dialog and substituting word balloons instead. there is no way of describing this demented cartoon except to tell you to see it for yourself. and make sure no one under 10 is in the room. dismemberment and cannibalism and cruelty and savagery and sudden death and callous disregard for others are common themes. honest. perhaps the most memorable image is that of an elephant composed of water that the kitties swim through and in and and also ride. but like practically everything else in this film and that silly and picaresque interlude soon comes to a horrible end.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
magellan33 said represent you can only do so much when the two stars of the show can only be seen by one fellow cast member. i assume and then and that you never heard of topper. which and in addition to the two stars who could only be seen by one member of the cast and had a dog and ditto. this was the kind of program that had not gonna make it written allover it from the first episode it was like an arcade video game where you actually have to read the instructions to play while no one (well and very few of us and apparently) wants to watch a comedy program that has a basic premise that actually requires thought to grasp.	magellan33 said represent you can only do so much when the two stars of the show can only be seen by one fellow cast member. i assume and then and that you never heard of topper. which and in addition to the two stars who could only be seen by one member of the cast and had a dog and ditto. this was the kind of program that had not gonna make it written allover it from the first episode it was like an arcade video game where you actually have to read the instructions to play while no one (well and very few of us and apparently) wants to watch a comedy program that has a basic premise that actually requires thought to grasp.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
sorry to say i have no idea what hollywood is doing. sure give us movies like batman begins. oh and by the way hollywood i think they may cover the story line in the movie batman and but please do not entertain us what we would really want to see batman and superman together. i really hated this trailer because it left me wanting for more. i was looking around to see when it was coming out. it was like a terrible practical joke. the graphics where good the story line seemed solid and it had all the trappings of a great movie. unfortunately it not going to happen for now. to the producers and directors and all the actors great job but i hate you for doing this to me. you left me wanting more.	sorry to say i have no idea what hollywood is doing. sure give us movies like batman begins. oh and by the way hollywood i think they may cover the story line in the movie batman and but please do not entertain us what we would really want to see batman and superman together. i really hated this trailer because it left me wanting for more. i was looking around to see when it was coming out. it was like a terrible practical joke. the graphics where good the story line seemed solid and it had all the trappings of a great movie. unfortunately it not going to happen for now. to the producers and directors and all the actors great job but i hate you for doing this to me. you left me wanting more.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
this movie is a remake of two movies that were a lot better. the last one and heaven can wait and was great and i suggest you see that one. this one is not so great. the last third of the movie is not so bad and chris rock starts to show some of the comic fun that got him to where he is today. however and i do not know what happened to the first two parts of this movie. it plays like some really bad b movie where people sound like they are in some bad tv sit com. the situations are forced and it is like they are just trying to get the story over so they can start the real movie. it all seems real fake and the editing is just bad. i do not know how they could release this movie like that. anyway and the last part isn not to bad and so wait for the video and see it then.	this movie is a remake of two movies that were a lot better. the last one and heaven can wait and was great and i suggest you see that one. this one is not so great. the last third of the movie is not so bad and chris rock starts to show some of the comic fun that got him to where he is today. however and i do not know what happened to the first two parts of this movie. it plays like some really bad b movie where people sound like they are in some bad tv sit com. the situations are forced and it is like they are just trying to get the story over so they can start the real movie. it all seems real fake and the editing is just bad. i do not know how they could release this movie like that. anyway and the last part isn not to bad and so wait for the video and see it then.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
while a pleasant enough musical and what stuck with me about this movie was the unexpected comedic chemistry between basil rathbone and as the has been composer and and oscar levant as his assistant. playing a high strung and distracted artistic type (a far cry from his more familiar roles as either menacing villains or the coolly logical sherlock holmes) and rathbone character looks like he couldn not find his way out of bed without help. and that help is starbuck and played with his usual droll humor by oscar levant. upon hiring crosby character as his ghost song writer and rathbone introduces him to starbuck by saying and he does all my thinking for me. and to which levant responds and ah and it only a part time job. of course this goes right past (or over) rathbone and who too busy fretting about where his next hit song will come from. as another reviewer said and who knew rathbone could be so funny. too bad he do not have more opportunities to display his comedic talent.	while a pleasant enough musical and what stuck with me about this movie was the unexpected comedic chemistry between basil rathbone and as the has been composer and and oscar levant as his assistant. playing a high strung and distracted artistic type (a far cry from his more familiar roles as either menacing villains or the coolly logical sherlock holmes) and rathbone character looks like he couldn not find his way out of bed without help. and that help is starbuck and played with his usual droll humor by oscar levant. upon hiring crosby character as his ghost song writer and rathbone introduces him to starbuck by saying and he does all my thinking for me. and to which levant responds and ah and it only a part time job. of course this goes right past (or over) rathbone and who too busy fretting about where his next hit song will come from. as another reviewer said and who knew rathbone could be so funny. too bad he do not have more opportunities to display his comedic talent.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
this is why i still have nightmares. this terrifying film (a musical) was considered appropriate for children in the 1970s. a boy leaves on a magical journey to an island. the mayor of the island and pufnstuf and allegedly a dragon and looking more like a newt with conjunctivitis to me and and a magic talking flute are targeted by a witch (billie halliday and who was considered a bit of alright at the time). the flute is recovered at an interesting witches convention and with the witches having a gay old time. the boy dresses in drag then as a fairy to recover the flute. not suitable for children.	this is why i still have nightmares. this terrifying film (a musical) was considered appropriate for children in the 1970s. a boy leaves on a magical journey to an island. the mayor of the island and pufnstuf and allegedly a dragon and looking more like a newt with conjunctivitis to me and and a magic talking flute are targeted by a witch (billie halliday and who was considered a bit of alright at the time). the flute is recovered at an interesting witches convention and with the witches having a gay old time. the boy dresses in drag then as a fairy to recover the flute. not suitable for children.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
i caught the last half of this movie on cable one night and was struck by just how morbid it was. even when one of the two victims is at his most deteriorated and the camera keeps going. the lingering shots of his corpse being uncovered and his concentration camp figure being zipped into a body bag are both moving and depressing. do not watch this movie if your already depressed. then again do not watch it if your feeling really good.	i caught the last half of this movie on cable one night and was struck by just how morbid it was. even when one of the two victims is at his most deteriorated and the camera keeps going. the lingering shots of his corpse being uncovered and his concentration camp figure being zipped into a body bag are both moving and depressing. do not watch this movie if your already depressed. then again do not watch it if your feeling really good.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
this movie was rather awful vipul shah last movie was good this one was just bad although it a good story and is handled in a great way aatish kapadia who adapted this movie from another gujarati play avjo wahala fari malishu made a good but slow pianful 2 and a half hours to watch there are a lot of flaws in this movie but it still a entertainer songs are rather bleaked out and do not work well but theyre still good overall not a movie you would enthusiastically watch it still a story to take in to account and it good if youre the relationship type pretty good movie with loads of flaws and humor that really not needed even one bit.	this movie was rather awful vipul shah last movie was good this one was just bad although it a good story and is handled in a great way aatish kapadia who adapted this movie from another gujarati play avjo wahala fari malishu made a good but slow pianful 2 and a half hours to watch there are a lot of flaws in this movie but it still a entertainer songs are rather bleaked out and do not work well but theyre still good overall not a movie you would enthusiastically watch it still a story to take in to account and it good if youre the relationship type pretty good movie with loads of flaws and humor that really not needed even one bit.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
let me start out by saying i am a big carrey fan. although i will admit i haven not seen all of his movies coughthe magesticcough. bruce almighty was enjoyable. none of the other reviews have really gone into how cheesy it gets towards the end and i dont know what the writers were thinking. somehow i couldn not help but feel like this movie was a poor attempt at re creating liar liar. on a positive note and the daily show steve correl is hilarious and so is the rest of the cast. see bruce almighty if youre a big jim carrey fan and or if you just want to see a light hearted (que soft piano music) somewhat funny comedy.	let me start out by saying i am a big carrey fan. although i will admit i haven not seen all of his movies coughthe magesticcough. bruce almighty was enjoyable. none of the other reviews have really gone into how cheesy it gets towards the end and i dont know what the writers were thinking. somehow i couldn not help but feel like this movie was a poor attempt at re creating liar liar. on a positive note and the daily show steve correl is hilarious and so is the rest of the cast. see bruce almighty if youre a big jim carrey fan and or if you just want to see a light hearted (que soft piano music) somewhat funny comedy.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
just watched it on sky tv missed the first half an hour. i did wonder if it was a true story so watched it to the end. there was no brief at the end to say what happened to everyone. it did remind me of speed but at the end of the day i do not suppose it was released at the cinema as we did see the following error. the goof that we saw was that they remove the bonnet (hood) and then later on there are two shots of the car with the police car in front trying to slow it down when the bonnet is back on. it did have me on the edge of my seat especially when i thought the baby was going to hit the bridge and of course when the bridge wasn not going to be lowered and then it was. i am afraid i did burst into tears so it wasn not that bad.	just watched it on sky tv missed the first half an hour. i did wonder if it was a true story so watched it to the end. there was no brief at the end to say what happened to everyone. it did remind me of speed but at the end of the day i do not suppose it was released at the cinema as we did see the following error. the goof that we saw was that they remove the bonnet (hood) and then later on there are two shots of the car with the police car in front trying to slow it down when the bonnet is back on. it did have me on the edge of my seat especially when i thought the baby was going to hit the bridge and of course when the bridge wasn not going to be lowered and then it was. i am afraid i did burst into tears so it wasn not that bad.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
i saw this film at the international film festival of brussels. i also met the director of the film. i heard that ed wood wrote the story in 10 years. i am sure he thought his would be his masterpiece his triumph. well and if you take the film seriously (like mr. wood did) it is really one of the worst films you will ever see. and this is cool. the big joke of i woke up early the day i died is that it doesn not even try to be a decent film. this makes the film very and very good. the script is filled with nihilism and anarchism a lot of black humour. billy zane role is absolutely excellent. you see and this is either high art. or low rubbish. or .	i saw this film at the international film festival of brussels. i also met the director of the film. i heard that ed wood wrote the story in 10 years. i am sure he thought his would be his masterpiece his triumph. well and if you take the film seriously (like mr. wood did) it is really one of the worst films you will ever see. and this is cool. the big joke of i woke up early the day i died is that it doesn not even try to be a decent film. this makes the film very and very good. the script is filled with nihilism and anarchism a lot of black humour. billy zane role is absolutely excellent. you see and this is either high art. or low rubbish. or .	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
the photography was beautiful but i had difficulty understanding what was happening. was there a lot of symbolism. the 2 goldfishes do they mean something in thai culture. there not much plot and not much happens and it just meanders along. no real start and no real middle and no real end. rather unsatisfying really. it was difficult to get into the characters as you never felt you got to know them. it was difficult to know which scenes were imaginary and which were real. the move felt chaotic and disjointed. i do not know what the pang brothers were hoping to achieve. maybe if i were thai it would make more sense.	the photography was beautiful but i had difficulty understanding what was happening. was there a lot of symbolism. the 2 goldfishes do they mean something in thai culture. there not much plot and not much happens and it just meanders along. no real start and no real middle and no real end. rather unsatisfying really. it was difficult to get into the characters as you never felt you got to know them. it was difficult to know which scenes were imaginary and which were real. the move felt chaotic and disjointed. i do not know what the pang brothers were hoping to achieve. maybe if i were thai it would make more sense.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
this picture came out in 1975 and it was the second in the three part series of the life of sheriff buford pusser. bo svenson takes over the role of sheriff buford pusser and and luke askew plays the role of mobster pinky dobson. the last that we saw sheriff pusser he was laying in a hospital bed after him and his wife who was killed in ambushed sunday morning drive. after pusser recovers he goes after the men that killed his wife. is pusser able to complete the revenge that he after or does the mob try to take him out before he successes. the only thing that bother me about this picture that this was an actual true story. how could you leave in a town with this kind of crime and yet do not do anything about it. since there was real no name actress in this picture i can not give it 10 weasel stars but i can give 8.	this picture came out in 1975 and it was the second in the three part series of the life of sheriff buford pusser. bo svenson takes over the role of sheriff buford pusser and and luke askew plays the role of mobster pinky dobson. the last that we saw sheriff pusser he was laying in a hospital bed after him and his wife who was killed in ambushed sunday morning drive. after pusser recovers he goes after the men that killed his wife. is pusser able to complete the revenge that he after or does the mob try to take him out before he successes. the only thing that bother me about this picture that this was an actual true story. how could you leave in a town with this kind of crime and yet do not do anything about it. since there was real no name actress in this picture i can not give it 10 weasel stars but i can give 8.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
damn straight. this show was kick ass back in the day and still continues to outshine cartoons today. i can not wait to track down some of the dvd to share with my little guy and see the same sparkle in his eyes. i have already introduced him to voltron (the 5 lions one and not the 15 vehicles one)and i laughed my head off when he said to me one day dad. you sure watched some awesome cartoons when you were a kid. how cool is that. come on hollywood and dust this one off and give it a live action attempt. couldn not be any worse than spiderman 3 was. man oh man. 2007 has been pretty lame so far for summer movies. ok and i will shuddup nowcheers.	damn straight. this show was kick ass back in the day and still continues to outshine cartoons today. i can not wait to track down some of the dvd to share with my little guy and see the same sparkle in his eyes. i have already introduced him to voltron (the 5 lions one and not the 15 vehicles one)and i laughed my head off when he said to me one day dad. you sure watched some awesome cartoons when you were a kid. how cool is that. come on hollywood and dust this one off and give it a live action attempt. couldn not be any worse than spiderman 3 was. man oh man. 2007 has been pretty lame so far for summer movies. ok and i will shuddup nowcheers.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
i found this film to be the usual french slap in america face. the camera and all too often and focuses on fat people and on sloppy homes and on tacky rural areas. while the narration seems to sympathize with and admire the small town folks who are introduced to the viewer and the cinematography exploits and demeans them. there were and undoubtedly and thin people to be seen in glencoe and neat and organized homes and but malle chose to show us the worst of what was there to be seen. i can only hope that some american filmmakers will go to france to reveal to the american public its worst elements. i can assure you and as a frequent visitor to france and that all is not well there. foreign immigrants are not readily assimilated and thus creating severe social inequities. but americans are not eager to unmask the french for their prejudice toward their own compatriots and their envy toward the u. s. and so were not likely to see films on the subject.	i found this film to be the usual french slap in america face. the camera and all too often and focuses on fat people and on sloppy homes and on tacky rural areas. while the narration seems to sympathize with and admire the small town folks who are introduced to the viewer and the cinematography exploits and demeans them. there were and undoubtedly and thin people to be seen in glencoe and neat and organized homes and but malle chose to show us the worst of what was there to be seen. i can only hope that some american filmmakers will go to france to reveal to the american public its worst elements. i can assure you and as a frequent visitor to france and that all is not well there. foreign immigrants are not readily assimilated and thus creating severe social inequities. but americans are not eager to unmask the french for their prejudice toward their own compatriots and their envy toward the u. s. and so were not likely to see films on the subject.	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
born again is a okay episode of season 1. the reincarnation bit and in my opinion and is cool. the more i watch it and the more i like it and yet it will never rise above very good for me. even though it is not very memorable and i will always remember it as the reincarnation episode. anyway and now i will say what is good and bad about this episode and the good represent oragami. oh yeah. that fish tank was nice. equals ]thrown out of a window. very classy. x]the bad represent marry your best friend wife. o_owhat a random pick to reincarnate. why do not the guy who died by having his scarf tangled up and try to take his scarf off instead. conclusion represent okay episode and not very memorable. positive .	born again is a okay episode of season 1. the reincarnation bit and in my opinion and is cool. the more i watch it and the more i like it and yet it will never rise above very good for me. even though it is not very memorable and i will always remember it as the reincarnation episode. anyway and now i will say what is good and bad about this episode and the good represent oragami. oh yeah. that fish tank was nice. equals ]thrown out of a window. very classy. x]the bad represent marry your best friend wife. o_owhat a random pick to reincarnate. why do not the guy who died by having his scarf tangled up and try to take his scarf off instead. conclusion represent okay episode and not very memorable. positive .	This is a semantically positive review.	This is a semantically negative review.
cool idea. botched writing and botched directing and botched editing and botched acting. sorta makes me wish i could play god and strike everyone involved in making this film with several bolts of lightning.	cool idea. botched writing and botched directing and botched editing and botched acting. sorta makes me wish i could play god and strike everyone involved in making this film with several bolts of lightning.	This is a semantically negative review.	This is a semantically positive review.
. for the lt to have chosen this one. first and the film wasn not horrible and it was just hollywood. worst case i need this to happen or we have no movie scenario represent if willis mission was to save the doctor and but she was adamant that her people make it out of the missionary and he would have put her on that first chopper and marched those refugees to the border without her. he would not have compromised his package for the refugees. that not how it works. but and as i pointed out and this is hollywood and we must have drama. this is why we make movies and because reality isn not quite so complicated. however and i did think that willis and the good doctor had workable chemistry. that said and there are also some well done battle scenes in the film. it not a waste of time and tears of the sun is worth the dvd rental fee. check it out on a rainy day and you will be satisfied.	. for the lt to have chosen this one. first and the film wasn not horrible and it was just hollywood. worst case i need this to happen or we have no movie scenario represent if willis mission was to save the doctor and but she was adamant that her people make it out of the missionary and he would have put her on that first chopper and marched those refugees to the border without her. he would not have compromised his package for the refugees. that not how it works. but and as i pointed out and this is hollywood and we must have drama. this is why we make movies and because reality isn not quite so complicated. however and i did think that willis and the good doctor had workable chemistry. that said and there are also some well done battle scenes in the film. it not a waste of time and tears of the sun is worth the dvd rental fee. check it out on a rainy day and you will be satisfied.	This is a semantically negative review.	This is a semantically positive review.
this is one of those so bad it is good films that you always hear about but never see. unlike troma films which are deliberately bad and campy (and i am not amused) this one is 100% pure serious. however with features such as a supposedly super lethal killer robot that prances about like one of the solid gold dancers on an acid trip and a magical first mate that calls down lightning and transforms into the good witch of the east the fact that it takes itself seriously pushes it so far over the edge of bad that makes it full circle around back to entertaining. watcheable enough because of that.	this is one of those so bad it is good films that you always hear about but never see. unlike troma films which are deliberately bad and campy (and i am not amused) this one is 100% pure serious. however with features such as a supposedly super lethal killer robot that prances about like one of the solid gold dancers on an acid trip and a magical first mate that calls down lightning and transforms into the good witch of the east the fact that it takes itself seriously pushes it so far over the edge of bad that makes it full circle around back to entertaining. watcheable enough because of that.	This is a semantically negative review.	This is a semantically positive review.
but and lets face it. it got a few nostalgic sighs out of me. the show is just so consistently great that it is allowed to have a few hiccups. i get a new season and and just power through them like i have 2 days to live. i like the idea of wrapping it up and but it was much more of an end of season episode which would explain the following representdr. cox isn not supposed to be bald for a couple more episodes and only explanation i can think of is they changed the rotation of the episodes or had to re shoot the beginning. and that my friends and is why the hell cox is bald. anyways and the show is awesome. bring on the 7th season.	but and lets face it. it got a few nostalgic sighs out of me. the show is just so consistently great that it is allowed to have a few hiccups. i get a new season and and just power through them like i have 2 days to live. i like the idea of wrapping it up and but it was much more of an end of season episode which would explain the following representdr. cox isn not supposed to be bald for a couple more episodes and only explanation i can think of is they changed the rotation of the episodes or had to re shoot the beginning. and that my friends and is why the hell cox is bald. anyways and the show is awesome. bring on the 7th season.	This is a semantically negative review.	This is a semantically positive review.
ghost of dragstrip hollow was one of the many 50s movies about hot rodding teens encountering the supernatural. in this case and the teens can not pay the rent for their hangout and get evicted. with nowhere else to go and they decide on an apparently haunted house. as you may have guessed and once they arrive and some weird things start happening. and there a twist at the end. there nothing in this movie that you haven not seen in other movies and but it nice entertainment nonetheless. my favorite character was the foul mouthed parrot. well and let me rephrase that represent he do not talk like a character in a quentin tarantino movie and but he said things that we do not expect out of a bird. the movie pure hokum and but harmless.	ghost of dragstrip hollow was one of the many 50s movies about hot rodding teens encountering the supernatural. in this case and the teens can not pay the rent for their hangout and get evicted. with nowhere else to go and they decide on an apparently haunted house. as you may have guessed and once they arrive and some weird things start happening. and there a twist at the end. there nothing in this movie that you haven not seen in other movies and but it nice entertainment nonetheless. my favorite character was the foul mouthed parrot. well and let me rephrase that represent he do not talk like a character in a quentin tarantino movie and but he said things that we do not expect out of a bird. the movie pure hokum and but harmless.	This is a semantically negative review.	This is a semantically positive review.
squeamish 11 year old luke benward (as billy worm boy forrester) moves to a new town. at his new school and young benward is picked on by the other boys. they put worms in his thermos. getting his gag reflex under control and benward tosses a worm on freckle faced bully adam hicks (as joe guire). benward bets he can eat 10 worms in one day without regurgitation. tall and teased hallie kate eisenberg (as erika erk tansy) uses her archery skills to help benward. director and former sctv writer bob dolman promises and no worms were harmed in the making of this movie. in a related note and sctv star andrea martin has one funny scene. how to eat fried worms is loosely based on thomas rockwell popular novel. pre teen kids into gross outs should enjoy the film. how to eat fried worms (8/25/06) bob dolman ~ luke benward and adam hicks and hallie kate eisenberg and alexander gould.	squeamish 11 year old luke benward (as billy worm boy forrester) moves to a new town. at his new school and young benward is picked on by the other boys. they put worms in his thermos. getting his gag reflex under control and benward tosses a worm on freckle faced bully adam hicks (as joe guire). benward bets he can eat 10 worms in one day without regurgitation. tall and teased hallie kate eisenberg (as erika erk tansy) uses her archery skills to help benward. director and former sctv writer bob dolman promises and no worms were harmed in the making of this movie. in a related note and sctv star andrea martin has one funny scene. how to eat fried worms is loosely based on thomas rockwell popular novel. pre teen kids into gross outs should enjoy the film. how to eat fried worms (8/25/06) bob dolman ~ luke benward and adam hicks and hallie kate eisenberg and alexander gould.	This is a semantically negative review.	This is a semantically positive review.