text
stringlengths
12
440
cluster
stringclasses
3 values
He forgave her for that. He feels like she owes him something because she knows that he's worried about her going out and drinking and she did it five nights in a row.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary is not accurate; the poster accidentally offended their friend whose mother died recently by telling her that their mother is alive.
2) Content Accuracy
The author doesn’t say she is worried about him cheating in the post but the summary does. She is actually concerned that he might have been hurt.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary states that the girl was his girlfriend but in the post it was just a girl he liked and she had turned the idea of a relationship down.
2) Content Accuracy
This is an accurate account of the information that was in the post
2) Content Accuracy
I don't think he's concerned the dog is aggressive, concerned about bath time aggression alone.
2) Content Accuracy
This should explain that they want to get back together with their ex, and that the “rules” is playing games.
2) Content Accuracy
John is not straight
2) Content Accuracy
Author states everything is okay now and not the biggest stressor.
2) Content Accuracy
This summary reads like the man broke up with his girlfriend but it was actually the other way around.
2) Content Accuracy
This is not a good reflection of the post. To be precise, the poster says she looked like a street walker not that she was a street walker.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary is not accurate; the poster does not like it when their parents go through their stuff, but they let them do it.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary doesn't mention the author being a young man anywhere.
2) Content Accuracy
unfair to her husband that she can't enjoy sex when she's down-not exactly what she states. More along the lines of she sees herself as disgusting and it ruins the mood.
2) Content Accuracy
The drunk boyfriend is the one who said "I love you" first.
2) Content Accuracy
Author is asking for advice on how not to be institutionalised so this summary is pretty off in terms of context
2) Content Accuracy
This isn’t accurate, the girlfriend does want a long distance relationship but the poster doesn’t.
2) Content Accuracy
that we don't talk much should read "after not having a conversation in awhile". He's known her for awhile.
2) Content Accuracy
This is not a clear reflection of the post. They are not both trying because she has not been receptive of his efforts to help her change her behavior.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary says that they lost the friendship but in the post they said they are worried they are losing the friendship, not that it’s happened yet.
2) Content Accuracy
This is a good summary but should clarify that the past infidelity was with a past boyfriend.
2) Content Accuracy
I think this isn’t completely accurate because a lot of the post is how she’s in love with her best friend which could be him, but he’s not sure.
2) Content Accuracy
The author is also disinterested in all of his classes.
2) Content Accuracy
It seems to me that the money is not actually child support, which the author says he has been paying faithfully, but an extra expense outside of that.
2) Content Accuracy
This is a bit weirdly written because it implies the author is dating more than one person.
2) Content Accuracy
This is an accurate summary of what happened to the author.
2) Content Accuracy
The author wasn't scared that he would be unable to perform, she just thought that would be the case.
2) Content Accuracy
The sisters friend is the one who laces the dress too tight, not the authors sister.
2) Content Accuracy
The poster does not say that she does not know what to do about the situation but is confused about it.
2) Content Accuracy
This is not accurate. The grilfriend is the one who purchased a card for the author, not the other way around.
2) Content Accuracy
The PhD student is female.
2) Content Accuracy
I think this should clarify what she’s doing when she’s going out and how he’s okay with the situation but isn’t sure how to handle it.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary is partly inaccurate; the poster does not want to call their friend not because she is out of the country, but because they do not want to hear her voice. There is also no indication that the poster is female.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary is misleading as it sidesteps the intention of the comment and paints it as overt and blatant rather than a misconstrued situation involving a gross comedic misstep.
2) Content Accuracy
This is accurate, but it should point out the goal is for their site to be epic.
2) Content Accuracy
His girlfriend his hurt is missing.
2) Content Accuracy
Boyfriend and girlfriend live together and his mother wouldn't allow her to move his things and accused her of stealing money for a car.
2) Content Accuracy
The post says that they don’t want to break up over IM like the summary is stating.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary is not exactly accurate; the poster does not mention thinking that her boyfriend will not forgive her.
2) Content Accuracy
It isn't quite accurate about their passion for art, its just the thing driving him to want to pursue it is also telling him not to bother. It's the drive to get really good at programming that they lack.
2) Content Accuracy
The post doesn’t mention that the boyfriend will definitely be proposing soon, just that they’ve gotten serious about the possibility of it.
2) Content Accuracy
Man said something about her family
2) Content Accuracy
This is an accurate summary of what was mentioned in the post
2) Content Accuracy
The summary says that the guy she was seeing was a boyfriend but the post states that they were just friends with benefits and nothing serious.
2) Content Accuracy
Who's moving out? Him or his mother?
2) Content Accuracy
This is an accurate cummary of what was mentioned in the post
2) Content Accuracy
The summary is inaccurate.
2) Content Accuracy
It is not true that the wife is bored generally; she and her husband have become bored in their relationship.
2) Content Accuracy
She propositioned him after he quit talking to her because she's too pessimistic.
2) Content Accuracy
The poster does not feel unsexy but wonders if helping her partner with housework makes her unsexy.
2) Content Accuracy
Both children have special needs, though one is more severe than the other.
2) Content Accuracy
Guy wants to know if he should pursue a relationship. They were both accepted at their top college but she turned down the offer.
2) Content Accuracy
Graphic artists of Reddit have given no such advice. This is not accurate.
2) Content Accuracy
The boyfriend never said no to going shooting like the summary states.
2) Content Accuracy
This is not accurate because he has a reason for not texting back
2) Content Accuracy
This summary is not a true reflection of the post because the couple are still having sex.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary suggests that he feels the need to mess around but in the post he clearly states that he doesn’t feel the need and is concerned he may feel it someday.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary doesn't indicate the authors PUA beliefs or that he treats his girlfriend poorly deliberately.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary is inaccurate; the poster has not met her boyfriend's parents yet, and he does not plan on introducing her to them for at least another year.
2) Content Accuracy
This summary reads like it was written from the boyfriend’s perspective but the post was from the girlfriend’s.
2) Content Accuracy
This summary says that the reason USA servers get paid the most is because of entitlement but that is more of an opinion than fact and should be stated as such.
2) Content Accuracy
notjustgold.com doesn't actually exist, it was a hypothetical example.
2) Content Accuracy
This is an inaccurate account of what is in the post. It mentions him leaving which is an assumption the OP is making, not a proven fact.
2) Content Accuracy
This summary implies the author is questioning their current relationship because of the breakup, which isn't true. The author is happy about their current relationship.
2) Content Accuracy
This is an accurate and full summary of the post.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary is not exactly accurate; the poster is wondering if he should support his girlfriend.
2) Content Accuracy
This is an accurate account of what was mentioned in the post.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary is not clear at all and inaccurate. The poster is a female dating a male and they are very much in love. She wants to be with him and have a family with him, but is obsessing over being in a relationship with a woman and wishes she had tried it before meeting her boyfriend.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary is inaccurate; the poster is not unsure if he should stay in it because of the distance.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary should make it clearer that the author confessed her feeling first, not the other way around.
2) Content Accuracy
That wasn't the lie, the lie was about a short fling he had in the summer after they got together but before they were "official."
2) Content Accuracy
The boyfriend was present for the first part of the party but left early so he felt resentful when the party seemed to get more fun after he left. The summary stated that he was resentful because he wasn’t present.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary is inaccurate; the poster is regretting it because they believe that having sex for the first time should be something shared with someone you care about.
2) Content Accuracy
There's no "him" in this story. Both of the people in this story are women. Also the summary needs to include something about how the girlfriend can't cope with the results of the accident.
2) Content Accuracy
The poster's ex-girlfriend's family did not tell the poster that he should wait for her.
2) Content Accuracy
17M should read 17 year old male
2) Content Accuracy
Nowhere in the story does it mention the driver of the vehicle was a woman so that fact from the summary may be incorrect.
2) Content Accuracy
She invited him over to her house but also invited his best friend
2) Content Accuracy
The post never states that they dated, they had an affair as the boyfriend was still with his girlfriend.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary is confusing and misconstrues the events. The friend's garage burned down while the author was in the house. They had attempted to light the wood stove in the garage but it would not take so they moved the gathering into the house. Later, his friend who was outside, alerted him that the garage was on fire. The entire structure burnt to the ground except for the wood stove with the newspapers and logs untouched inside.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary is fairly on point except for the timeline inaccuracies. They dated for four years in high school. They broke up roughly a year ago, given their ages, and she reconnected with him three months ago.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary is inaccurate; the poster helped a friend picked out a bottle of lube at Walmart and gave the cashier the wrong impression that they were two males in a gay relationship and using it for themselves.
2) Content Accuracy
I think this can include that the GF actually went home, and that she also lied about being in the office.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary is good, but states the author threw their phone twice, but they didn't actually throw it, they almost threw it.
2) Content Accuracy
This is accurate and is not missing any key information
2) Content Accuracy
Girl lives over 4 hours away
2) Content Accuracy
Guy thinks she's hiding something.
2) Content Accuracy
The post never states that the woman became a "completely different person" after they started dating.
2) Content Accuracy
She's not a college graduate. She's a high school senior.
2) Content Accuracy
She has a lot of money now, but he makes more money than her, so over time he may have contributed more financially and the prenup will screw him over.
2) Content Accuracy
There is nothing in the passage that mentions the best friend is happier, but this summary suggests it.
2) Content Accuracy
The poster never specified that the friend moving to Korea was her best friend, so the summary is misleading.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary is inaccurate; the poster did not feel odd seeing their first love after 6 years.
2) Content Accuracy
The summary is kind of inaccurate; the poster is asking if they should disclose that they left a job after a month when applying for a new job.
2) Content Accuracy
This summary does not reflect the post correctly because the girl knows how she feels and wants to be with the guy.
2) Content Accuracy
It's not the owner at this point buy may adopt the horse.
2) Content Accuracy
The poster's girlfriend is not graduating high school; she is going to be a senior in high school.
2) Content Accuracy
This is not accurate. The writer has already decided they want to stay
2) Content Accuracy
The summary is slightly inaccurate; the poster finds out that the TV is worth something like $1,700, not over $1,700.
2) Content Accuracy
This summary states that Reddit’s founder posted the plea for Wikipedia but it’s actually Wikipedia’s founder.
2) Content Accuracy