Update README.md

README.md

@@ -3,25 +3,270 @@ license: apache-2.0
 base_model: google/flan-t5-large
 tags:
 - generated_from_trainer
+- NLPPaper_to_Question_Generation
 model-index:
-- name: Prompting-NLP-Paper-to-QA-Generation-abstract-only
+- name: FLAN-T5-NLP-Paper-to-Question-Generation
  results: []
-
 widget:
-- text: "Generate Question, Answer pair correspond to the following research paper. [Abstract] The dominant sequence transduction models are based on complex recurrent or convolutional neural networks in an encoder-decoder configuration. The best performing models also connect the encoder and decoder through an attention mechanism. We propose a new simple network architecture, the Transformer, based solely on attention mechanisms, dispensing with recurrence and convolutions entirely. Experiments on two machine translation tasks show these models to be superior in quality while being more parallelizable and requiring significantly less time to train. Our model achieves 28.4 BLEU on the WMT 2014 English-to-German translation task, improving over the existing best results, including ensembles by over 2 BLEU. On the WMT 2014 English-to-French translation task, our model establishes a new single-model state-of-the-art BLEU score of 41.8 after training for 3.5 days on eight GPUs, a small fraction of the training costs of the best models from the literature. We show that the Transformer generalizes well to other tasks by applying it successfully to English constituency parsing both with large and limited training data. [Introduction] Recurrent neural networks, long short-term memory [13] and gated recurrent [7] neural networks in particular, have been firmly established as state of the art approaches in sequence modeling and transduction problems such as language modeling and machine translation [35, 2, 5]. Numerous efforts have since continued to push the boundaries of recurrent language models and encoder-decoder architectures [38, 24, 15]. Recurrent models typically factor computation along the symbol positions of the input and output sequences. Aligning the positions to steps in computation time, they generate a sequence of hidden states ht, as a function of the previous hidden state ht−1 and the input for position t. This inherently sequential nature precludes parallelization within training examples, which becomes critical at longer sequence lengths, as memory constraints limit batching across examples. Recent work has achieved significant improvements in computational efficiency through factorization tricks [21] and conditional computation [32], while also improving model performance in case of the latter. The fundamental constraint of sequential computation, however, remains. Attention mechanisms have become an integral part of compelling sequence modeling and transduction models in various tasks, allowing modeling of dependencies without regard to their distance in the input or output sequences [2, 19]. In all but a few cases [27], however, such attention mechanisms are used in conjunction with a recurrent network. In this work we propose the Transformer, a model architecture eschewing recurrence and instead relying entirely on an attention mechanism to draw global dependencies between input and output. The Transformer allows for significantly more parallelization and can reach a new state of the art in translation quality after being trained for as little as twelve hours on eight P100 GPUs. \n Question, Answer:"
- example_title: "Attention Is All You Need"
-- text: "Generate Question, Answer pair correspond to the following research paper. [Abstract] In this work, we explore prompt tuning, a simple yet effective mechanism for learning soft prompts to condition frozen language models to perform specific downstream tasks. Unlike the discrete text prompts used by GPT-3, soft prompts are learned through backpropagation and can be tuned to incorporate signal from any number of labeled examples. Our end-to-end learned approach outperforms GPT-3's few-shot learning by a large margin. More remarkably, through ablations on model size using T5, we show that prompt tuning becomes more competitive with scale: as models exceed billions of parameters, our method closes the gap and matches the strong performance of model tuning (where all model weights are tuned). This finding is especially relevant in that large models are costly to share and serve, and the ability to reuse one frozen model for multiple downstream tasks can ease this burden. Our method can be seen as a simplification of the recently proposed prefix tuning of Li and Liang (2021), and we provide a comparison to this and other similar approaches. Finally, we show that conditioning a frozen model with soft prompts confers benefits in robustness to domain transfer, as compared to full model tuning. [Introduction] With the wide success of pre-trained large language models, a range of techniques has arisen to adapt these general-purpose models to downstream tasks. ELMo (Peters et al., 2018) proposed freezing the pre-trained model and learning a task-specific weighting of its per-layer representations. However, since GPT (Radford et al., 2018) and BERT (Devlin et al., 2019), the dominant adaptation technique has been model tuning (or fine-tuning), where all model parameters are tuned during adaptation, as proposed by Howard and Ruder (2018).More recently, Brown et al. (2020) showed that prompt design (or priming) is surprisingly effective at modulating a frozen GPT-3 model’s behavior through text prompts. Prompts are typically composed of a task description and/or several canonical examples. This return to freezing pre-trained models is appealing, especially as model size continues to increase. Rather than requiring a separate copy of the model for each downstream task, a single generalist model can simultaneously serve many different tasks. Unfortunately, prompt-based adaptation has several key drawbacks. Task description is error-prone and requires human involvement, and the effectiveness of a prompt is limited by how much conditioning text can fit into the model’s input. As a result, downstream task quality still lags far behind that of tuned models. For instance, GPT-3 175B fewshot performance on SuperGLUE is 17.5 points below fine-tuned T5-XXL (Raffel et al., 2020) (71.8 vs. 89.3) despite using 16 times more parameters. Several efforts to automate prompt design have been recently proposed. Shin et al. (2020) propose a search algorithm over the discrete space of words, guided by the downstream application training data. While this technique outperforms manual prompt design, there is still a gap relative to model tuning. Li and Liang (2021) propose prefix tuning and show strong results on generative tasks. This method freezes the model parameters and backpropagates the error during tuning to prefix activations prepended to each layer in the encoder stack, including the input layer. Hambardzumyan et al. (2021) simplify this recipe by restricting the trainable parameters to the input and output subnetworks of a masked language model, and show reasonable results on classifications tasks. In this paper, we propose prompt tuning as a further simplification for adapting language models. We freeze the entire pre-trained model and only allow an additional k tunable tokens per downstream task to be prepended to the input text. This soft prompt is trained end-to-end and can condense the signal from a full labeled dataset, allowing our method to outperform few-shot prompts and close the quality gap with model tuning (Figure 1). At the same time, since a single pre-trained model is recycled for all downstream tasks, we retain the efficient serving benefits of frozen models (Figure 2). While we developed our method concurrently with Li and Liang (2021) and Hambardzumyan et al. (2021), we are the first to show that prompt tuning alone (with no intermediate-layer prefixes or task-specific output layers) is sufficient to be competitive with model tuning. Through detailed experiments in sections 2–3, we demonstrate that language model capacity is a key ingredient for these approaches to succeed. As Figure 1 shows, prompt tuning becomes more competitive with scale. We compare with similar approaches in Section 4. Explicitly separating task-specific parameters from the generalist parameters needed for general language-understanding has a range of additional benefits. We show in Section 5 that by capturing the task definition in the prompt while keeping the generalist parameters fixed, we are able to achieve better resilience to domain shifts. In Section 6, we show that prompt ensembling, learning multiple prompts for the same task, can boost quality and is more efficient than classic model ensembling. Finally, in Section 7, we investigate the interpretability of our learned soft prompts. In sum, our key contributions are: 1. Proposing prompt tuning and showing its competitiveness with model tuning in the regime of large language models. 2. Ablating many design choices, and showing quality and robustness improve with scale. 3. Showing prompt tuning outperforms model tuning on domain shift problems. 4. Proposing prompt ensembling and showing its effectiveness. \n Question, Answer:"
- example_title: "PEFT (2104.08691)"
-- text: "Generate Question, Answer pair correspond to the following research paper. [Abstract] For the first time in the world, we succeeded in synthesizing the room-temperature superconductor (Tc≥400 K, 127∘C) working at ambient pressure with a modified lead-apatite (LK-99) structure. The superconductivity of LK-99 is proved with the Critical temperature (Tc), Zero-resistivity, Critical current (Ic), Critical magnetic field (Hc), and the Meissner effect. The superconductivity of LK-99 originates from minute structural distortion by a slight volume shrinkage (0.48 %), not by external factors such as temperature and pressure. The shrinkage is caused by Cu2+ substitution of Pb2+(2) ions in the insulating network of Pb(2)-phosphate and it generates the stress. It concurrently transfers to Pb(1) of the cylindrical column resulting in distortion of the cylindrical column interface, which creates superconducting quantum wells (SQWs) in the interface. The heat capacity results indicated that the new model is suitable for explaining the superconductivity of LK-99. The unique structure of LK-99 that allows the minute distorted structure to be maintained in the interfaces is the most important factor that LK-99 maintains and exhibits superconductivity at room temperatures and ambient pressure. [Introduction] Since the discovery of the first superconductor(1), many efforts to search for new roomtemperature superconductors have been carried out worldwide(2, 3) through their experimental clarity or/and theoretical perspectives(4-8). The recent success of developing room-temperature superconductors with hydrogen sulfide(9) and yttrium super-hydride(10) has great attention worldwide, which is expected by strong electron-phonon coupling theory with high-frequency hydrogen phonon modes(11, 12). However, it is difficult to apply them to actual application devices in daily life because of the tremendously high pressure, and more efforts are being made to overcome the high-pressure problem(13). For the first time in the world, we report the success in synthesizing a room-temperature and ambient-pressure superconductor with a chemical approach to solve the temperature and pressure problem. We named the first room temperature and ambient pressure superconductor LK-99. The superconductivity of LK-99 proved with the Critical temperature (Tc), Zero-resistivity, Critical current (Ic), Critical magnetic field (Hc), and Meissner effect(14, 15). Several data were collected and analyzed in detail to figure out the puzzle of superconductivity of LK-99: X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (EPR), Heat Capacity, and Superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) data. Henceforth in this paper, we will report and discuss our new findings including superconducting quantum wells associated with the superconductivity of LK-99.\n Question, Answer:"
- example_title: "LK-99 (Not NLP)"
-- text: "Generate Question, Answer pair correspond to the following research paper. [Abstract] Abstract Evaluation practices in natural language generation (NLG) have many known flaws, but improved evaluation approaches are rarely widely adopted. This issue has become more urgent, since neural NLG models have improved to the point where they can often no longer be distinguished based on the surfacelevel features that older metrics rely on. This paper surveys the issues with human and automatic model evaluations and with commonly used datasets in NLG that have been pointed out over the past 20 years. We summarize, categorize, and discuss how researchers have been addressing these issues and what their findings mean for the current state of model evaluations. Building on those insights, we lay out a long-term vision for NLG evaluation and propose concrete steps for researchers to improve their evaluation processes. Finally, we analyze 66 NLG papers from recent NLP conferences in how well they already follow these suggestions and identify which areas require more drastic changes to the status quo. [Introduction] There are many issues with the evaluation of models that generate natural language. For example, datasets are often constructed in a way that prevents measuring tail effects of robustness, and they almost exclusively cover English. Most automated metrics measure only similarity between model output and references instead of fine-grained quality aspects (and even that poorly). Human evaluations have a high variance and, due to insufficient documentation, rarely produce replicable results. These issues have become more urgent as the nature of models that generate language has changed without significant changes to how they are being evaluated. While evaluation methods can capture surface-level improvements in text generated by state-of-the-art models (such as increased fluency) to some extent, they are ill-suited to detect issues with the content of model outputs, for example if they are not attributable to input information. These ineffective evaluations lead to overestimates of model capabilities. Deeper analyses uncover that popular models fail even at simple tasks by taking shortcuts, overfitting, hallucinating, and not being in accordance with their communicative goals. Identifying these shortcomings, many recent papers critique evaluation techniques or propose new ones. But almost none of the suggestions are followed or new techniques used. There is an incentive mismatch between conducting high-quality evaluations and publishing new models or modeling techniques. While general-purpose evaluation techniques could lower the barrier of entry for incorporating evaluation advances into model development, their development requires resources that are hard to come by, including model outputs on validation and test sets or large quantities of human assessments of such outputs. Moreover, some issues, like the refinement of datasets, require iterative processes where many researchers collaborate. All this leads to a circular dependency where evaluations of generation models can be improved only if generation models use better evaluations. We find that there is a systemic difference between selecting the best model and characterizing how good this model really is. Current evaluation techniques focus on the first, while the second is required to detect crucial issues. More emphasis needs to be put on measuring and reporting model limitations, rather than focusing on producing the highest performance numbers. To that end, this paper surveys analyses and critiques of evaluation approaches (sections 3 and 4) and of commonly used NLG datasets (section 5). Drawing on their insights, we describe how researchers developing modeling techniques can help to improve and subsequently benefit from better evaluations with methods available today (section 6). Expanding on existing work on model documentation and formal evaluation processes (Mitchell et al., 2019; Ribeiro et al., 2020), we propose releasing evaluation reports which focus on demonstrating NLG model shortcomings using evaluation suites. These reports should apply a complementary set of automatic metrics, include rigorous human evaluations, and be accompanied by data releases that allow for re-analysis with improved metrics. In an analysis of 66 recent EMNLP, INLG, and ACL papers along 29 dimensions related to our suggestions (section 7), we find that the first steps toward an improved evaluation are already frequently taken at an average rate of 27%. The analysis uncovers the dimensions that require more drastic changes in the NLG community. For example, 84% of papers already report results on multiple datasets and more than 28% point out issues in them, but we found only a single paper that contributed to the dataset documentation, leaving future researchers to re-identify those issues. We further highlight typical unsupported claims and a need for more consistent data release practices. Following the suggestions and results, we discuss how incorporating the suggestions can improve evaluation research, how the suggestions differ from similar ones made for NLU, and how better metrics can benefit model development itself (section 8). \n Question, Answer:"
- example_title: "NLG-Eval (2202.06935)"
+- text: >-
+ Generate Question, Answer pair correspond to the following research paper.
+ [Abstract] The dominant sequence transduction models are based on complex
+ recurrent or convolutional neural networks in an encoder-decoder
+ configuration. The best performing models also connect the encoder and
+ decoder through an attention mechanism. We propose a new simple network
+ architecture, the Transformer, based solely on attention mechanisms,
+ dispensing with recurrence and convolutions entirely. Experiments on two
+ machine translation tasks show these models to be superior in quality while
+ being more parallelizable and requiring significantly less time to train.
+ Our model achieves 28.4 BLEU on the WMT 2014 English-to-German translation
+ task, improving over the existing best results, including ensembles by over
+ 2 BLEU. On the WMT 2014 English-to-French translation task, our model
+ establishes a new single-model state-of-the-art BLEU score of 41.8 after
+ training for 3.5 days on eight GPUs, a small fraction of the training costs
+ of the best models from the literature. We show that the Transformer
+ generalizes well to other tasks by applying it successfully to English
+ constituency parsing both with large and limited training data.
+ [Introduction] Recurrent neural networks, long short-term memory [13] and
+ gated recurrent [7] neural networks in particular, have been firmly
+ established as state of the art approaches in sequence modeling and
+ transduction problems such as language modeling and machine translation [35,
+ 2, 5]. Numerous efforts have since continued to push the boundaries of
+ recurrent language models and encoder-decoder architectures [38, 24, 15].
+ Recurrent models typically factor computation along the symbol positions of
+ the input and output sequences. Aligning the positions to steps in
+ computation time, they generate a sequence of hidden states ht, as a
+ function of the previous hidden state ht−1 and the input for position t.
+ This inherently sequential nature precludes parallelization within training
+ examples, which becomes critical at longer sequence lengths, as memory
+ constraints limit batching across examples. Recent work has achieved
+ significant improvements in computational efficiency through factorization
+ tricks [21] and conditional computation [32], while also improving model
+ performance in case of the latter. The fundamental constraint of sequential
+ computation, however, remains. Attention mechanisms have become an integral
+ part of compelling sequence modeling and transduction models in various
+ tasks, allowing modeling of dependencies without regard to their distance in
+ the input or output sequences [2, 19]. In all but a few cases [27], however,
+ such attention mechanisms are used in conjunction with a recurrent network.
+ In this work we propose the Transformer, a model architecture eschewing
+ recurrence and instead relying entirely on an attention mechanism to draw
+ global dependencies between input and output. The Transformer allows for
+ significantly more parallelization and can reach a new state of the art in
+ translation quality after being trained for as little as twelve hours on
+ eight P100 GPUs. 
+ Question, Answer:
+ example_title: Attention Is All You Need
+- text: >-
+ Generate Question, Answer pair correspond to the following research paper.
+ [Abstract] In this work, we explore prompt tuning, a simple yet effective
+ mechanism for learning soft prompts to condition frozen language models to
+ perform specific downstream tasks. Unlike the discrete text prompts used by
+ GPT-3, soft prompts are learned through backpropagation and can be tuned to
+ incorporate signal from any number of labeled examples. Our end-to-end
+ learned approach outperforms GPT-3's few-shot learning by a large margin.
+ More remarkably, through ablations on model size using T5, we show that
+ prompt tuning becomes more competitive with scale: as models exceed billions
+ of parameters, our method closes the gap and matches the strong performance
+ of model tuning (where all model weights are tuned). This finding is
+ especially relevant in that large models are costly to share and serve, and
+ the ability to reuse one frozen model for multiple downstream tasks can ease
+ this burden. Our method can be seen as a simplification of the recently
+ proposed prefix tuning of Li and Liang (2021), and we provide a comparison
+ to this and other similar approaches. Finally, we show that conditioning a
+ frozen model with soft prompts confers benefits in robustness to domain
+ transfer, as compared to full model tuning. [Introduction] With the wide
+ success of pre-trained large language models, a range of techniques has
+ arisen to adapt these general-purpose models to downstream tasks. ELMo
+ (Peters et al., 2018) proposed freezing the pre-trained model and learning a
+ task-specific weighting of its per-layer representations. However, since GPT
+ (Radford et al., 2018) and BERT (Devlin et al., 2019), the dominant
+ adaptation technique has been model tuning (or fine-tuning), where all model
+ parameters are tuned during adaptation, as proposed by Howard and Ruder
+ (2018).More recently, Brown et al. (2020) showed that prompt design (or
+ priming) is surprisingly effective at modulating a frozen GPT-3 model’s
+ behavior through text prompts. Prompts are typically composed of a task
+ description and/or several canonical examples. This return to freezing
+ pre-trained models is appealing, especially as model size continues to
+ increase. Rather than requiring a separate copy of the model for each
+ downstream task, a single generalist model can simultaneously serve many
+ different tasks. Unfortunately, prompt-based adaptation has several key
+ drawbacks. Task description is error-prone and requires human involvement,
+ and the effectiveness of a prompt is limited by how much conditioning text
+ can fit into the model’s input. As a result, downstream task quality still
+ lags far behind that of tuned models. For instance, GPT-3 175B fewshot
+ performance on SuperGLUE is 17.5 points below fine-tuned T5-XXL (Raffel et
+ al., 2020) (71.8 vs. 89.3) despite using 16 times more parameters. Several
+ efforts to automate prompt design have been recently proposed. Shin et al.
+ (2020) propose a search algorithm over the discrete space of words, guided
+ by the downstream application training data. While this technique
+ outperforms manual prompt design, there is still a gap relative to model
+ tuning. Li and Liang (2021) propose prefix tuning and show strong results on
+ generative tasks. This method freezes the model parameters and
+ backpropagates the error during tuning to prefix activations prepended to
+ each layer in the encoder stack, including the input layer. Hambardzumyan et
+ al. (2021) simplify this recipe by restricting the trainable parameters to
+ the input and output subnetworks of a masked language model, and show
+ reasonable results on classifications tasks. In this paper, we propose
+ prompt tuning as a further simplification for adapting language models. We
+ freeze the entire pre-trained model and only allow an additional k tunable
+ tokens per downstream task to be prepended to the input text. This soft
+ prompt is trained end-to-end and can condense the signal from a full labeled
+ dataset, allowing our method to outperform few-shot prompts and close the
+ quality gap with model tuning (Figure 1). At the same time, since a single
+ pre-trained model is recycled for all downstream tasks, we retain the
+ efficient serving benefits of frozen models (Figure 2). While we developed
+ our method concurrently with Li and Liang (2021) and Hambardzumyan et al.
+ (2021), we are the first to show that prompt tuning alone (with no
+ intermediate-layer prefixes or task-specific output layers) is sufficient to
+ be competitive with model tuning. Through detailed experiments in sections
+ 2–3, we demonstrate that language model capacity is a key ingredient for
+ these approaches to succeed. As Figure 1 shows, prompt tuning becomes more
+ competitive with scale. We compare with similar approaches in Section 4.
+ Explicitly separating task-specific parameters from the generalist
+ parameters needed for general language-understanding has a range of
+ additional benefits. We show in Section 5 that by capturing the task
+ definition in the prompt while keeping the generalist parameters fixed, we
+ are able to achieve better resilience to domain shifts. In Section 6, we
+ show that prompt ensembling, learning multiple prompts for the same task,
+ can boost quality and is more efficient than classic model ensembling.
+ Finally, in Section 7, we investigate the interpretability of our learned
+ soft prompts. In sum, our key contributions are: 1. Proposing prompt tuning
+ and showing its competitiveness with model tuning in the regime of large
+ language models. 2. Ablating many design choices, and showing quality and
+ robustness improve with scale. 3. Showing prompt tuning outperforms model
+ tuning on domain shift problems. 4. Proposing prompt ensembling and showing
+ its effectiveness. 
+ Question, Answer:
+ example_title: PEFT (2104.08691)
+- text: >-
+ Generate Question, Answer pair correspond to the following research paper.
+ [Abstract] For the first time in the world, we succeeded in synthesizing the
+ room-temperature superconductor (Tc≥400 K, 127∘C) working at ambient
+ pressure with a modified lead-apatite (LK-99) structure. The
+ superconductivity of LK-99 is proved with the Critical temperature (Tc),
+ Zero-resistivity, Critical current (Ic), Critical magnetic field (Hc), and
+ the Meissner effect. The superconductivity of LK-99 originates from minute
+ structural distortion by a slight volume shrinkage (0.48 %), not by external
+ factors such as temperature and pressure. The shrinkage is caused by Cu2+
+ substitution of Pb2+(2) ions in the insulating network of Pb(2)-phosphate
+ and it generates the stress. It concurrently transfers to Pb(1) of the
+ cylindrical column resulting in distortion of the cylindrical column
+ interface, which creates superconducting quantum wells (SQWs) in the
+ interface. The heat capacity results indicated that the new model is
+ suitable for explaining the superconductivity of LK-99. The unique structure
+ of LK-99 that allows the minute distorted structure to be maintained in the
+ interfaces is the most important factor that LK-99 maintains and exhibits
+ superconductivity at room temperatures and ambient pressure. [Introduction] 
+ Since the discovery of the first superconductor(1), many efforts to search
+ for new roomtemperature superconductors have been carried out worldwide(2,
+ 3) through their experimental clarity or/and theoretical perspectives(4-8).
+ The recent success of developing room-temperature superconductors with
+ hydrogen sulfide(9) and yttrium super-hydride(10) has great attention
+ worldwide, which is expected by strong electron-phonon coupling theory with
+ high-frequency hydrogen phonon modes(11, 12). However, it is difficult to
+ apply them to actual application devices in daily life because of the
+ tremendously high pressure, and more efforts are being made to overcome the
+ high-pressure problem(13). For the first time in the world, we report the
+ success in synthesizing a room-temperature and ambient-pressure
+ superconductor with a chemical approach to solve the temperature and
+ pressure problem. We named the first room temperature and ambient pressure
+ superconductor LK-99. The superconductivity of LK-99 proved with the
+ Critical temperature (Tc), Zero-resistivity, Critical current (Ic), Critical
+ magnetic field (Hc), and Meissner effect(14, 15). Several data were
+ collected and analyzed in detail to figure out the puzzle of
+ superconductivity of LK-99: X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron
+ spectroscopy (XPS), Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (EPR), Heat
+ Capacity, and Superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) data.
+ Henceforth in this paper, we will report and discuss our new findings
+ including superconducting quantum wells associated with the
+ superconductivity of LK-99.
+ Question, Answer:
+ example_title: LK-99 (Not NLP)
+- text: >-
+ Generate Question, Answer pair correspond to the following research paper.
+ [Abstract] Abstract Evaluation practices in natural language generation
+ (NLG) have many known flaws, but improved evaluation approaches are rarely
+ widely adopted. This issue has become more urgent, since neural NLG models
+ have improved to the point where they can often no longer be distinguished
+ based on the surfacelevel features that older metrics rely on. This paper
+ surveys the issues with human and automatic model evaluations and with
+ commonly used datasets in NLG that have been pointed out over the past 20
+ years. We summarize, categorize, and discuss how researchers have been
+ addressing these issues and what their findings mean for the current state
+ of model evaluations. Building on those insights, we lay out a long-term
+ vision for NLG evaluation and propose concrete steps for researchers to
+ improve their evaluation processes. Finally, we analyze 66 NLG papers from
+ recent NLP conferences in how well they already follow these suggestions and
+ identify which areas require more drastic changes to the status quo.
+ [Introduction] There are many issues with the evaluation of models that
+ generate natural language. For example, datasets are often constructed in a
+ way that prevents measuring tail effects of robustness, and they almost
+ exclusively cover English. Most automated metrics measure only similarity
+ between model output and references instead of fine-grained quality aspects
+ (and even that poorly). Human evaluations have a high variance and, due to
+ insufficient documentation, rarely produce replicable results. These issues
+ have become more urgent as the nature of models that generate language has
+ changed without significant changes to how they are being evaluated. While
+ evaluation methods can capture surface-level improvements in text generated
+ by state-of-the-art models (such as increased fluency) to some extent, they
+ are ill-suited to detect issues with the content of model outputs, for
+ example if they are not attributable to input information. These ineffective
+ evaluations lead to overestimates of model capabilities. Deeper analyses
+ uncover that popular models fail even at simple tasks by taking shortcuts,
+ overfitting, hallucinating, and not being in accordance with their
+ communicative goals. Identifying these shortcomings, many recent papers
+ critique evaluation techniques or propose new ones. But almost none of the
+ suggestions are followed or new techniques used. There is an incentive
+ mismatch between conducting high-quality evaluations and publishing new
+ models or modeling techniques. While general-purpose evaluation techniques
+ could lower the barrier of entry for incorporating evaluation advances into
+ model development, their development requires resources that are hard to
+ come by, including model outputs on validation and test sets or large
+ quantities of human assessments of such outputs. Moreover, some issues, like
+ the refinement of datasets, require iterative processes where many
+ researchers collaborate. All this leads to a circular dependency where
+ evaluations of generation models can be improved only if generation models
+ use better evaluations. We find that there is a systemic difference between
+ selecting the best model and characterizing how good this model really is.
+ Current evaluation techniques focus on the first, while the second is
+ required to detect crucial issues. More emphasis needs to be put on
+ measuring and reporting model limitations, rather than focusing on producing
+ the highest performance numbers. To that end, this paper surveys analyses
+ and critiques of evaluation approaches (sections 3 and 4) and of commonly
+ used NLG datasets (section 5). Drawing on their insights, we describe how
+ researchers developing modeling techniques can help to improve and
+ subsequently benefit from better evaluations with methods available today
+ (section 6). Expanding on existing work on model documentation and formal
+ evaluation processes (Mitchell et al., 2019; Ribeiro et al., 2020), we
+ propose releasing evaluation reports which focus on demonstrating NLG model
+ shortcomings using evaluation suites. These reports should apply a
+ complementary set of automatic metrics, include rigorous human evaluations,
+ and be accompanied by data releases that allow for re-analysis with improved
+ metrics. In an analysis of 66 recent EMNLP, INLG, and ACL papers along 29
+ dimensions related to our suggestions (section 7), we find that the first
+ steps toward an improved evaluation are already frequently taken at an
+ average rate of 27%. The analysis uncovers the dimensions that require more
+ drastic changes in the NLG community. For example, 84% of papers already
+ report results on multiple datasets and more than 28% point out issues in
+ them, but we found only a single paper that contributed to the dataset
+ documentation, leaving future researchers to re-identify those issues. We
+ further highlight typical unsupported claims and a need for more consistent
+ data release practices. Following the suggestions and results, we discuss
+ how incorporating the suggestions can improve evaluation research, how the
+ suggestions differ from similar ones made for NLU, and how better metrics
+ can benefit model development itself (section 8). 
+ Question, Answer:
+ example_title: NLG-Eval (2202.06935)
+datasets:
+- UNIST-Eunchan/NLP-Paper-to-QA-Generation
+language:
+- en
+pipeline_tag: text2text-generation
 ---
 
 <!-- This model card has been generated automatically according to the information the Trainer had access to. You
 should probably proofread and complete it, then remove this comment. -->
 
-# Prompting-NLP-Paper-to-QA-Generation-abstract-only
+# FLAN-T5-NLP-Paper-to-Question-Generation
 
 This model is a fine-tuned version of [google/flan-t5-large](https://huggingface.co/google/flan-t5-large) on an unknown dataset.
 It achieves the following results on the evaluation set:
@@ -76,4 +321,4 @@ The following hyperparameters were used during training:
 - Transformers 4.35.2
 - Pytorch 2.1.0+cu118
 - Datasets 2.15.0
-- Tokenizers 0.15.0
+- Tokenizers 0.15.0