File size: 6,714 Bytes
840246d a8bda09 06cc836 a8bda09 06cc836 90867ec 0c1ac5e 90867ec 06cc836 0c1ac5e 7ef7cf6 0c1ac5e 7ef7cf6 57f345d 7ef7cf6 0c1ac5e b289481 0c1ac5e b289481 0c1ac5e b289481 0c1ac5e |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 |
---
license: apache-2.0
datasets:
- TIGER-Lab/VideoEval
language:
- en
metrics:
- accuracy
library_name: transformers
pipeline_tag: visual-question-answering
---
[Paper] | [Website](https://tiger-ai-lab.github.io/MantisScore/) | [Github](https://github.com/TIGER-AI-Lab/MantisScore) | [Datasets](https://huggingface.co/datasets/TIGER-Lab/VideoEval) | [Model](https://huggingface.co/TIGER-Lab/MantisScore) | [Demo](https://huggingface.co/spaces/Mantis-VL/MantisScore)
## Introduction
- MantisScore is a video quality evaluation model, taking [Mantis-8B-Idefics2](https://huggingface.co/TIGER-Lab/Mantis-8B-Idefics2) as base-model
and trained on [VideoEval](https://huggingface.co/datasets/TIGER-Lab/VideoEval),
a large video evaluation dataset with multi-aspect human scores.
- MantisScore can reach 75+ Spearman correlation with humans on VideoEval-test, surpassing all the MLLM-prompting methods and feature-based metrics.
- MantisScore also beat the best baselines on other three benchmarks EvalCrafter, GenAI-Bench and VBench, showing high alignment with human evaluations.
## Performance
### Evaluation Results
We test our video evaluation model MantisScore on VideoEval-test, EvalCrafter, GenAI-Bench and VBench.
For the first two benchmarks, we take Spearman corrleation between model's output and human ratings
averaged among all the evaluation aspects as indicator.
For GenAI-Bench and VBench, which include human preference data among two or more videos,
we employ the model's output to predict preferences and use pairwise accuracy as the performance indicator.
| metric | Final Sum Score | VideoEval-test | EvalCrafter | GenAI-Bench | VBench |
|-------------------|:---------------:|:--------------:|:-----------:|:-----------:|:------:|
| MantisScore (reg) | 278.3 | 75.7 | 51.1 | 78.5 | 73.0 |
| MantisScore (gen) | 222.4 | 77.1 | 27.6 | 59.0 | 58.7 |
| Gemini-1.5-Pro | 158.8 | 22.1 | 22.9 | 60.9 | 52.9 |
| Gemini-1.5-Flash | 157.5 | 20.8 | 17.3 | 67.1 | 52.3 |
| GPT-4o | 155.4 | 23.1 | 28.7 | 52.0 | 51.7 |
| CLIP-sim | 126.8 | 8.9 | 36.2 | 34.2 | 47.4 |
| DINO-sim | 121.3 | 7.5 | 32.1 | 38.5 | 43.3 |
| SSIM-sim | 118.0 | 13.4 | 26.9 | 34.1 | 43.5 |
| CLIP-Score | 114.4 | -7.2 | 21.7 | 45.0 | 54.9 |
| LLaVA-1.5-7B | 108.3 | 8.5 | 10.5 | 49.9 | 39.4 |
| LLaVA-1.6-7B | 93.3 | -3.1 | 13.2 | 44.5 | 38.7 |
| X-CLIP-Score | 92.9 | -1.9 | 13.3 | 41.4 | 40.1 |
| PIQE | 78.3 | -10.1 | -1.2 | 34.5 | 55.1 |
| BRISQUE | 75.9 | -20.3 | 3.9 | 38.5 | 53.7 |
| Idefics2 | 73.0 | 6.5 | 0.3 | 34.6 | 31.7 |
| SSIM-dyn | 42.5 | -5.5 | -17.0 | 28.4 | 36.5 |
| MES-dyn | 36.7 | -12.9 | -26.4 | 31.4 | 44.5 |
## Usage
### Installation
```bash
pip install git+https://github.com/TIGER-AI-Lab/MantisScore.git
```
### Inference
```python
import av
import numpy as np
def _read_video_pyav(
frame_paths:List[str],
max_frames:int,
):
frames = []
container.seek(0)
start_index = indices[0]
end_index = indices[-1]
for i, frame in enumerate(container.decode(video=0)):
if i > end_index:
break
if i >= start_index and i in indices:
frames.append(frame)
return np.stack([x.to_ndarray(format="rgb24") for x in frames])
MAX_NUM_FRAMES=16
REGRESSION_QUERY_PROMPT = """
Suppose you are an expert in judging and evaluating the quality of AI-generated videos,
please watch the following frames of a given video and see the text prompt for generating the video,
then give scores from 5 different dimensions:
(1) visual quality: the quality of the video in terms of clearness, resolution, brightness, and color
(2) temporal consistency, both the consistency of objects or humans and the smoothness of motion or movements
(3) dynamic degree, the degree of dynamic changes
(4) text-to-video alignment, the alignment between the text prompt and the video content
(5) factual consistency, the consistency of the video content with the common-sense and factual knowledge
for each dimension, output a float number from 1.0 to 4.0,
the higher the number is, the better the video performs in that sub-score,
the lowest 1.0 means Bad, the highest 4.0 means Perfect/Real (the video is like a real video)
Here is an output example:
visual quality: 3.2
temporal consistency: 2.7
dynamic degree: 4.0
text-to-video alignment: 2.3
factual consistency: 1.8
For this video, the text prompt is "{text_prompt}",
all the frames of video are as follows:
"""
video_path="examples/video1.mp4"
# sample uniformly 8 frames from the video
container = av.open(video_path)
total_frames = container.streams.video[0].frames
if total_frames > MAX_NUM_FRAMES:
indices = np.arange(0, total_frames, total_frames / MAX_NUM_FRAMES).astype(int)
else:
indices = np.arange(total_frames)
frames = [Image.fromarray(x) for x in _read_video_pyav(container, indices)]
eval_prompt = REGRESSION_QUERY_TEMPLATE.format(text_prompt=video_prompt)
num_image_token = eval_prompt.count("<image>")
if num_image_token < len(frames):
eval_prompt += "<image> " * (len(frames) - num_image_token)
flatten_images = []
for x in [frames]:
if isinstance(x, list):
flatten_images.extend(x)
else:
flatten_images.append(x)
flatten_images = [Image.open(x) if isinstance(x, str) else x for x in flatten_images]
inputs = processor(text=eval_prompt, images=flatten_images, return_tensors="pt")
inputs = {k: v.to(model.device) for k, v in inputs.items()}
with torch.no_grad():
outputs = model(**inputs)
logits = outputs.logits
num_aspects = logits.shape[-1]
aspect_scores = []
for i in range(num_aspects):
aspect_scores.append(round(logits[0, i].item(),ROUND_DIGIT))
print(aspect_scores)
```
### Training
see [MantisScore/training](https://github.com/TIGER-AI-Lab/MantisScore/training) for details
### Evaluation
see [MantisScore/benchmark]((https://github.com/TIGER-AI-Lab/MantisScore/benchmark)) for details
## Citation
|