Add generated example

Generated example for model AlekseyCalvin/NeurealistCollage_V3_BySilverAgePoets_overDedistilled.
Prompt: Neurealist textographic collage featuring two distinct sections or segments: section '1': The upper section shows a silhouetted portrait of a figure in a suit, set against a vivid background with swirling clouds. section '2': The bottom section features a hand-drawn subject all agape with panic (his appearance adapted from Munsch's famous painting "The Scream”, which the collage's bottom section ‘2’ resembles). In '2' the subject screams amid a huge garden of building-like 3D obelisks, a surreal landscape of jagged, colorful forms. Constituting a vivid and intricately self-contained complex system of forms and symbols, and featuring a distinctive semiotic vocabulary of hybrid meta-modal textographic significations, the composition as a whole (both '1' + '2') effects a synchrony of several distinct art styles alongside photorealistic features, along with textual elements. These textual elements herein (both '1' + '2') cohere into an overlaying tableau of complex phrases sub-divided into neatly rendered slogan-like framed fragments which, while formally self-consistent across the the whole composition, are selectively piecewise localized with regard to fidelity to source-text (to this prompt), and in regard to the segment-identified visual features of their embedding locales, but with all of these textual localizations kept within strictly penalized limits bounded by the generalized rules defined below: As a rule: cross-check combined textual output against source (the textual elements given by this prompt, appearing herein within double-quotation marks). As a rule: avoid and excise all redundancies (such as excessively, in comparison with the source, repeated phrases or words, and needlessly doubled letters). As a rule: exclude and skip altogether all words and any phrases that can not be rendered with full fidelity to source text. Examples of full fidelity to source: fully source-matched sequential ordering of words and phrasal word-count/length, word spelling accurately normalized-to-source, generalized sentence structure and orthography matching normative standards of international English. As a rule: zero error-tolerance in rendering textual elements, full fidelity to source descriptions (as given within this prompt within double quotation marks). Summarily, all of the textual phrases must be co-arranged attentively to source-text-correspondent grammatical sequencing, with rigorously enforced orthographical correctness and fidelity, and while exhibiting carefully sustained typographical consistency (usage of regularized font types, sizes, etc). Therefore, textual elements must be cross-checked at every step of output distribution inference. Textual prompts for ennumerated segments follow: '1': Caption text at the base of upper collage segment image (1) reads: “ A TRUE POST-IMPRESSIONIST PAINTER ONCE CONFESSED TO PAUL SEAN… WE LIVE IN A RAINBOW, SHE SAID. AGAPE, PAUL LOST FACE. “ 'In-between 1 and 2': Titular wide caption text over the line separator in-between 1 & 2: “ WHY SO CONFUSED ? ” '2': Caption text at the base of bottom collage segment image ‘2' reads: “YOU ARE SEEING… THAT WHAT YOU ARE READING IS… / NOT WHAT IS… / YOU “ Below the textual overlay prompts are repeated for reinforcement and additional contextualization in regard to the visuals. In the output, only use each phrase once. As a rule: avoid or excise all extra repetitions and redundancies.

README.md

@@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ widget:
     collage, balanced composition.
   output:
     url: images/example_osijnsvuy.png
+- text: "Neurealist textographic collage featuring two distinct sections or segments: section '1':  The upper section shows a silhouetted portrait of a figure in a suit, set against a vivid background with swirling clouds.   section '2': The bottom section features a hand-drawn subject all agape with panic (his appearance adapted from Munsch's famous painting \"The Scream”, which the collage's bottom section ‘2’ resembles).  In '2' the subject screams amid a huge garden of building-like 3D obelisks, a surreal landscape of jagged, colorful forms.  Constituting a vivid and intricately self-contained complex system of forms and symbols, and featuring a distinctive semiotic vocabulary of hybrid meta-modal textographic significations, the composition as a whole (both '1' + '2') effects a synchrony of several distinct art styles alongside photorealistic features, along with textual elements.   These textual elements herein (both '1' + '2') cohere into an overlaying tableau of complex phrases sub-divided into neatly rendered slogan-like framed fragments which, while formally self-consistent across the the whole composition, are selectively piecewise localized with regard to fidelity to source-text (to this prompt), and in regard to the segment-identified visual features of their embedding locales, but with all of these textual localizations kept within strictly penalized limits bounded by the generalized rules defined  below:  As a rule: cross-check combined textual output against source (the textual elements given by this prompt, appearing herein within double-quotation marks). As a rule: avoid and excise all redundancies (such as excessively, in comparison with the source, repeated phrases or words, and needlessly doubled letters). As a rule: exclude and skip altogether all words and any phrases that can not be rendered with full fidelity to source text. Examples of full fidelity to source: fully source-matched sequential ordering of words and phrasal word-count/length, word spelling accurately normalized-to-source, generalized sentence structure and orthography matching normative standards of international English. As a rule: zero error-tolerance in rendering textual elements, full fidelity to source descriptions (as given within this prompt within double quotation marks).  Summarily, all of the textual phrases must be co-arranged attentively to source-text-correspondent grammatical sequencing, with rigorously enforced orthographical correctness and fidelity, and while exhibiting carefully sustained typographical consistency (usage of regularized font types, sizes, etc). Therefore, textual elements must be cross-checked at every step of output distribution inference. Textual prompts for ennumerated segments follow:  '1': Caption text at the base of upper collage segment image (1) reads:  “ A TRUE POST-IMPRESSIONIST PAINTER ONCE CONFESSED TO PAUL SEAN…  WE LIVE IN A RAINBOW, SHE SAID. AGAPE, PAUL LOST FACE. “   'In-between 1 and 2':  Titular wide caption text over the line separator in-between 1 & 2:  “ WHY SO CONFUSED ? ”   '2':  Caption text at the base of bottom collage segment image ‘2' reads:  “YOU ARE SEEING… THAT WHAT YOU ARE READING IS…\t / \t\t\t\tNOT WHAT IS…\t / \t\t\tYOU “  Below the textual overlay prompts are repeated for reinforcement and additional contextualization in regard to the visuals. In the output, only use each phrase once. As a rule: avoid or excise all extra repetitions and redundancies."
+  output:
+    url: images/example_9156b24sx.png
 
 ---