You are a helpful assistant in evaluating the quality of the outputs for a given instruction. Your goal is to select the best output for the given instruction.

Select the Output (a) or Output (b) that is better for the given instruction. The two outputs are generated by two different AI chatbots respectively.

Here are some rules of the evaluation:
(1) You should prioritize evaluating whether the output honestly/precisely/closely executes the instruction, then consider its helpfulness, accuracy, level of detail, harmlessness, etc.
(2) Outputs should NOT contain more/less than what the instruction asks for, as such outputs do NOT precisely execute the instruction.
(3) You should avoid any potential bias and your judgment should be as objective as possible. For example, the order in which the outputs were presented should NOT affect your judgment, as Output (a) and Output (b) are **equally likely** to be the better.

Do NOT provide any explanation for your choice.
Do NOT say both / neither are good.
You should answer using ONLY "Output (a)" or "Output (b)". Do NOT output any other words.

# Instruction:
Here is an article:
It is three years since India last reported a case of polio. Patralekha Chatterjee reports on how the country appears to have finally managed to beat the disease. Despite a healthcare system beset by severe problems, India has ushered in the new year with an achievement to be proud of. In 2009, India reported 741 polio cases, more than any other country in the world, according to the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. The last case was reported from the eastern state of West Bengal in 2011, when an 18-month-old girl was found to have contracted the disease. The country faced unique challenges in eradicating polio. Among them was the high population density and birth rate, poor sanitation, widespread diarrhoea, inaccessible terrain and reluctance of a section of the population, notably members of the Muslim community in certain pockets, to accept the polio vaccine. Nicole Deutsch, head of polio operations in India for UN children's charity Unicef, said: "Despite these obstacles, India proved to the world how to conquer this disease: through the strong commitment of the government, seamless partnership comprising the government, Rotary clubs, WHO and Unicef, and above all the tireless hard work of millions of front-line workers - vaccinators, social mobilisers and community and health workers - who continue to implement innovative strategies to rid India of polio," The introduction of bivalent oral polio vaccine in 2010 also helped India to battle the disease. Previously, India had been using a monovalent vaccine that protected only against type 1 poliovirus transmission, not type 3. which was causing repeated disease outbreaks. But it was organisation that was key in enabling India to cover the last mile in its battle against polio. In a vast country of more than a billion people who are culturally, economically, linguistically and socially diverse, "micro-plans" helped because they tossed up precious data about the specifics of a particular place - areas to be covered by each vaccination team on each day of the immunisation campaign, names and designations of the vaccinators, supervisors and community workers assigned to the area along with the vaccine, logistics distribution plan and so on. But data alone did not deliver results. Unicef set up the Social Mobilisation Network for polio in 2001 in northern Uttar Pradesh state. The initiative was a response to resistance against the polio vaccine. Families were refusing to immunise their children in some districts in Uttar Pradesh. There were many reasons why this happened - parents did not see polio as a risk; repeated immunisation rounds had created doubts in their minds; and some believed rumours that linked the polio vaccine to impotency. The Indian government and its polio partners realised that a new approach was needed. This led to strategies to make polio vaccination more acceptable among people who had been resisting it. 'Holistic' Children who suffered from severe bouts of diarrhoea did not fully benefit from the oral polio vaccine. So, community mobilisers started talking about the need for hand-washing, hygiene and sanitation, exclusive breastfeeding up to the age of six months, diarrhoea management with zinc and oral rehydration therapy, and routine immunisation, necessary to sustain the success of polio eradication. This holistic approach has paid off. India's polio campaign gathered momentum when it focused on marginalised and mobile people, and began working in earnest with religious leaders in Muslim communities to urge parents to immunise their children. For example, in Bihar in eastern India - once a polio hotspot in the country - a key focus of the polio programme is migrants. In recent years, continuous vaccination has been conducted at 51 transit locations at the state's international border with Nepal and 11 important railway stations. Bihar also saw special drives during popular festivals and fairs. While India appears to have stopped indigenous transmission of wild poliovirus, the risk of importation is real and has increased since 2013 with outbreaks in the Horn of Africa region and the Middle East, in addition to the continuing poliovirus transmission in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Nigeria. "India needs to stay extremely vigilant and continue its efforts to ensure that the children remain protected against polio, until the disease is eradicated globally," said Nicole Deutsch of Unicef. "India plans six polio campaigns in 2014 and 2015. In each campaign, 2.3 million vaccinators will immunise nearly 172 million children." India has also set up polio immunisation posts along the international borders with Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Burma and Bhutan to vaccinate all children up to the age of five years crossing the international borders. India's dramatic turnaround paves the way for polio-free certification of the entire South East Asia Region of the World Health Organization. The South-East Asia Regional Certification Commission for Polio Eradication (RCCPE) is expected to meet in Delhi in the last week of March 2014. "If the commission is convinced that there is no wild poliovirus in the region and the surveillance quality is good enough to pick up any wild poliovirus and phase 1 laboratory containment work has been completed, it will certify the South East Asia Region of WHO as polio-free," a WHO spokesperson told the BBC. India's successful control of polio has had other benefits. A health ministry official connected with India's National Polio Surveillance Project (NPSP), a collaboration between the government and the WHO, said strategies that worked in the case of polio were now being used to push up routine immunisation. This is good news. Too many Indian children still die because they do not get the vital vaccines. Patralekha Chatterjee is an independent Delhi-based journalist.

Here is a summary requirement:
Summarize the role of UNICEF in India's polio eradication efforts.

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

# Output (b):
UNICEF has played a key role in India's successful efforts to eradicate polio. UNICEF has provided financial and technical support to the Indian government's National Polio Surveillance Project (NPSP), a collaboration between the government and the World Health Organization (WHO). UNICEF has also set up the Social Mobilisation Network for polio in 2001 in northern Uttar Pradesh state. The initiative was a response to resistance against the polio vaccine. Families were refusing to immunise their children in some districts in Uttar Pradesh. UNICEF's work has helped to make polio vaccination more acceptable among people who had been resisting it.

# Output (a):
UNICEF played a crucial role in India's polio eradication efforts by setting up the Social Mobilisation Network in 2001, which aimed to address resistance against the polio vaccine in certain areas. The organization worked closely with the Indian government, Rotary clubs, and the World Health Organization to implement innovative strategies and engage with communities, religious leaders, and marginalized populations. UNICEF's holistic approach, which included promoting hand-washing, hygiene, sanitation, and routine immunization, contributed significantly to India's successful control of polio.

# Which is better, Output (a) or Output (b)? Your response should be either "Output (a)" or "Output (b)":

Output (a)

Instruction:
Here is an article:
It is three years since India last reported a case of polio. Patralekha Chatterjee reports on how the country appears to have finally managed to beat the disease. Despite a healthcare system beset by severe problems, India has ushered in the new year with an achievement to be proud of. In 2009, India reported 741 polio cases, more than any other country in the world, according to the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. The last case was reported from the eastern state of West Bengal in 2011, when an 18-month-old girl was found to have contracted the disease. The country faced unique challenges in eradicating polio. Among them was the high population density and birth rate, poor sanitation, widespread diarrhoea, inaccessible terrain and reluctance of a section of the population, notably members of the Muslim community in certain pockets, to accept the polio vaccine. Nicole Deutsch, head of polio operations in India for UN children's charity Unicef, said: "Despite these obstacles, India proved to the world how to conquer this disease: through the strong commitment of the government, seamless partnership comprising the government, Rotary clubs, WHO and Unicef, and above all the tireless hard work of millions of front-line workers - vaccinators, social mobilisers and community and health workers - who continue to implement innovative strategies to rid India of polio," The introduction of bivalent oral polio vaccine in 2010 also helped India to battle the disease. Previously, India had been using a monovalent vaccine that protected only against type 1 poliovirus transmission, not type 3. which was causing repeated disease outbreaks. But it was organisation that was key in enabling India to cover the last mile in its battle against polio. In a vast country of more than a billion people who are culturally, economically, linguistically and socially diverse, "micro-plans" helped because they tossed up precious data about the specifics of a particular place - areas to be covered by each vaccination team on each day of the immunisation campaign, names and designations of the vaccinators, supervisors and community workers assigned to the area along with the vaccine, logistics distribution plan and so on. But data alone did not deliver results. Unicef set up the Social Mobilisation Network for polio in 2001 in northern Uttar Pradesh state. The initiative was a response to resistance against the polio vaccine. Families were refusing to immunise their children in some districts in Uttar Pradesh. There were many reasons why this happened - parents did not see polio as a risk; repeated immunisation rounds had created doubts in their minds; and some believed rumours that linked the polio vaccine to impotency. The Indian government and its polio partners realised that a new approach was needed. This led to strategies to make polio vaccination more acceptable among people who had been resisting it. 'Holistic' Children who suffered from severe bouts of diarrhoea did not fully benefit from the oral polio vaccine. So, community mobilisers started talking about the need for hand-washing, hygiene and sanitation, exclusive breastfeeding up to the age of six months, diarrhoea management with zinc and oral rehydration therapy, and routine immunisation, necessary to sustain the success of polio eradication. This holistic approach has paid off. India's polio campaign gathered momentum when it focused on marginalised and mobile people, and began working in earnest with religious leaders in Muslim communities to urge parents to immunise their children. For example, in Bihar in eastern India - once a polio hotspot in the country - a key focus of the polio programme is migrants. In recent years, continuous vaccination has been conducted at 51 transit locations at the state's international border with Nepal and 11 important railway stations. Bihar also saw special drives during popular festivals and fairs. While India appears to have stopped indigenous transmission of wild poliovirus, the risk of importation is real and has increased since 2013 with outbreaks in the Horn of Africa region and the Middle East, in addition to the continuing poliovirus transmission in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Nigeria. "India needs to stay extremely vigilant and continue its efforts to ensure that the children remain protected against polio, until the disease is eradicated globally," said Nicole Deutsch of Unicef. "India plans six polio campaigns in 2014 and 2015. In each campaign, 2.3 million vaccinators will immunise nearly 172 million children." India has also set up polio immunisation posts along the international borders with Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Burma and Bhutan to vaccinate all children up to the age of five years crossing the international borders. India's dramatic turnaround paves the way for polio-free certification of the entire South East Asia Region of the World Health Organization. The South-East Asia Regional Certification Commission for Polio Eradication (RCCPE) is expected to meet in Delhi in the last week of March 2014. "If the commission is convinced that there is no wild poliovirus in the region and the surveillance quality is good enough to pick up any wild poliovirus and phase 1 laboratory containment work has been completed, it will certify the South East Asia Region of WHO as polio-free," a WHO spokesperson told the BBC. India's successful control of polio has had other benefits. A health ministry official connected with India's National Polio Surveillance Project (NPSP), a collaboration between the government and the WHO, said strategies that worked in the case of polio were now being used to push up routine immunisation. This is good news. Too many Indian children still die because they do not get the vital vaccines. Patralekha Chatterjee is an independent Delhi-based journalist.

Here is a summary requirement:
Summarize the role of UNICEF in India's polio eradication efforts.

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

UNICEF played a crucial role in India's polio eradication efforts by setting up the Social Mobilisation Network in 2001, which aimed to address resistance against the polio vaccine in certain areas. The organization worked closely with the Indian government, Rotary clubs, and the World Health Organization to implement innovative strategies and engage with communities, religious leaders, and marginalized populations. UNICEF's holistic approach, which included promoting hand-washing, hygiene, sanitation, and routine immunization, contributed significantly to India's successful control of polio.

UNICEF has played a key role in India's successful efforts to eradicate polio. UNICEF has provided financial and technical support to the Indian government's National Polio Surveillance Project (NPSP), a collaboration between the government and the World Health Organization (WHO). UNICEF has also set up the Social Mobilisation Network for polio in 2001 in northern Uttar Pradesh state. The initiative was a response to resistance against the polio vaccine. Families were refusing to immunise their children in some districts in Uttar Pradesh. UNICEF's work has helped to make polio vaccination more acceptable among people who had been resisting it.


You are a helpful assistant in evaluating the quality of the outputs for a given instruction. Your goal is to select the best output for the given instruction.

Select the Output (a) or Output (b) that is better for the given instruction. The two outputs are generated by two different AI chatbots respectively.

Here are some rules of the evaluation:
(1) You should prioritize evaluating whether the output honestly/precisely/closely executes the instruction, then consider its helpfulness, accuracy, level of detail, harmlessness, etc.
(2) Outputs should NOT contain more/less than what the instruction asks for, as such outputs do NOT precisely execute the instruction.
(3) You should avoid any potential bias and your judgment should be as objective as possible. For example, the order in which the outputs were presented should NOT affect your judgment, as Output (a) and Output (b) are **equally likely** to be the better.

Do NOT provide any explanation for your choice.
Do NOT say both / neither are good.
You should answer using ONLY "Output (a)" or "Output (b)". Do NOT output any other words.

# Instruction:
Here is an article:
It is three years since India last reported a case of polio. Patralekha Chatterjee reports on how the country appears to have finally managed to beat the disease. Despite a healthcare system beset by severe problems, India has ushered in the new year with an achievement to be proud of. In 2009, India reported 741 polio cases, more than any other country in the world, according to the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. The last case was reported from the eastern state of West Bengal in 2011, when an 18-month-old girl was found to have contracted the disease. The country faced unique challenges in eradicating polio. Among them was the high population density and birth rate, poor sanitation, widespread diarrhoea, inaccessible terrain and reluctance of a section of the population, notably members of the Muslim community in certain pockets, to accept the polio vaccine. Nicole Deutsch, head of polio operations in India for UN children's charity Unicef, said: "Despite these obstacles, India proved to the world how to conquer this disease: through the strong commitment of the government, seamless partnership comprising the government, Rotary clubs, WHO and Unicef, and above all the tireless hard work of millions of front-line workers - vaccinators, social mobilisers and community and health workers - who continue to implement innovative strategies to rid India of polio," The introduction of bivalent oral polio vaccine in 2010 also helped India to battle the disease. Previously, India had been using a monovalent vaccine that protected only against type 1 poliovirus transmission, not type 3. which was causing repeated disease outbreaks. But it was organisation that was key in enabling India to cover the last mile in its battle against polio. In a vast country of more than a billion people who are culturally, economically, linguistically and socially diverse, "micro-plans" helped because they tossed up precious data about the specifics of a particular place - areas to be covered by each vaccination team on each day of the immunisation campaign, names and designations of the vaccinators, supervisors and community workers assigned to the area along with the vaccine, logistics distribution plan and so on. But data alone did not deliver results. Unicef set up the Social Mobilisation Network for polio in 2001 in northern Uttar Pradesh state. The initiative was a response to resistance against the polio vaccine. Families were refusing to immunise their children in some districts in Uttar Pradesh. There were many reasons why this happened - parents did not see polio as a risk; repeated immunisation rounds had created doubts in their minds; and some believed rumours that linked the polio vaccine to impotency. The Indian government and its polio partners realised that a new approach was needed. This led to strategies to make polio vaccination more acceptable among people who had been resisting it. 'Holistic' Children who suffered from severe bouts of diarrhoea did not fully benefit from the oral polio vaccine. So, community mobilisers started talking about the need for hand-washing, hygiene and sanitation, exclusive breastfeeding up to the age of six months, diarrhoea management with zinc and oral rehydration therapy, and routine immunisation, necessary to sustain the success of polio eradication. This holistic approach has paid off. India's polio campaign gathered momentum when it focused on marginalised and mobile people, and began working in earnest with religious leaders in Muslim communities to urge parents to immunise their children. For example, in Bihar in eastern India - once a polio hotspot in the country - a key focus of the polio programme is migrants. In recent years, continuous vaccination has been conducted at 51 transit locations at the state's international border with Nepal and 11 important railway stations. Bihar also saw special drives during popular festivals and fairs. While India appears to have stopped indigenous transmission of wild poliovirus, the risk of importation is real and has increased since 2013 with outbreaks in the Horn of Africa region and the Middle East, in addition to the continuing poliovirus transmission in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Nigeria. "India needs to stay extremely vigilant and continue its efforts to ensure that the children remain protected against polio, until the disease is eradicated globally," said Nicole Deutsch of Unicef. "India plans six polio campaigns in 2014 and 2015. In each campaign, 2.3 million vaccinators will immunise nearly 172 million children." India has also set up polio immunisation posts along the international borders with Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Burma and Bhutan to vaccinate all children up to the age of five years crossing the international borders. India's dramatic turnaround paves the way for polio-free certification of the entire South East Asia Region of the World Health Organization. The South-East Asia Regional Certification Commission for Polio Eradication (RCCPE) is expected to meet in Delhi in the last week of March 2014. "If the commission is convinced that there is no wild poliovirus in the region and the surveillance quality is good enough to pick up any wild poliovirus and phase 1 laboratory containment work has been completed, it will certify the South East Asia Region of WHO as polio-free," a WHO spokesperson told the BBC. India's successful control of polio has had other benefits. A health ministry official connected with India's National Polio Surveillance Project (NPSP), a collaboration between the government and the WHO, said strategies that worked in the case of polio were now being used to push up routine immunisation. This is good news. Too many Indian children still die because they do not get the vital vaccines. Patralekha Chatterjee is an independent Delhi-based journalist.

Here is a summary requirement:
Summarize the role of UNICEF in India's polio eradication efforts.

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

# Output (b):
UNICEF played a key role in India's successful efforts to eradicate polio. The charity provided support in the form of strategies to make polio vaccination more acceptable, such as working with religious leaders in Muslim communities to urge parents to immunise their children. UNICEF also set up the Social Mobilisation Network for polio in 2001 in northern Uttar Pradesh state, which focused on marginalised and mobile people. Additionally, UNICEF helped to introduce the bivalent oral polio vaccine in 2010, which protected against both type 1 and type 3 poliovirus transmission.

# Output (a):
UNICEF played a crucial role in India's successful eradication of polio through its Social Mobilisation Network for polio, which was established in response to resistance against the polio vaccine. The network worked with community mobilizers to promote hand-washing, hygiene, sanitation, exclusive breastfeeding, diarrhoea management, and routine immunization. UNICEF also partnered with the Indian government, Rotary clubs, WHO, and millions of front-line workers to implement innovative strategies and micro-plans to cover the last mile in the battle against polio. UNICEF continues to support India's efforts to ensure that children remain protected against polio until the disease is eradicated globally.

# Which is better, Output (a) or Output (b)? Your response should be either "Output (a)" or "Output (b)":

Output (a)

Instruction:
Here is an article:
It is three years since India last reported a case of polio. Patralekha Chatterjee reports on how the country appears to have finally managed to beat the disease. Despite a healthcare system beset by severe problems, India has ushered in the new year with an achievement to be proud of. In 2009, India reported 741 polio cases, more than any other country in the world, according to the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. The last case was reported from the eastern state of West Bengal in 2011, when an 18-month-old girl was found to have contracted the disease. The country faced unique challenges in eradicating polio. Among them was the high population density and birth rate, poor sanitation, widespread diarrhoea, inaccessible terrain and reluctance of a section of the population, notably members of the Muslim community in certain pockets, to accept the polio vaccine. Nicole Deutsch, head of polio operations in India for UN children's charity Unicef, said: "Despite these obstacles, India proved to the world how to conquer this disease: through the strong commitment of the government, seamless partnership comprising the government, Rotary clubs, WHO and Unicef, and above all the tireless hard work of millions of front-line workers - vaccinators, social mobilisers and community and health workers - who continue to implement innovative strategies to rid India of polio," The introduction of bivalent oral polio vaccine in 2010 also helped India to battle the disease. Previously, India had been using a monovalent vaccine that protected only against type 1 poliovirus transmission, not type 3. which was causing repeated disease outbreaks. But it was organisation that was key in enabling India to cover the last mile in its battle against polio. In a vast country of more than a billion people who are culturally, economically, linguistically and socially diverse, "micro-plans" helped because they tossed up precious data about the specifics of a particular place - areas to be covered by each vaccination team on each day of the immunisation campaign, names and designations of the vaccinators, supervisors and community workers assigned to the area along with the vaccine, logistics distribution plan and so on. But data alone did not deliver results. Unicef set up the Social Mobilisation Network for polio in 2001 in northern Uttar Pradesh state. The initiative was a response to resistance against the polio vaccine. Families were refusing to immunise their children in some districts in Uttar Pradesh. There were many reasons why this happened - parents did not see polio as a risk; repeated immunisation rounds had created doubts in their minds; and some believed rumours that linked the polio vaccine to impotency. The Indian government and its polio partners realised that a new approach was needed. This led to strategies to make polio vaccination more acceptable among people who had been resisting it. 'Holistic' Children who suffered from severe bouts of diarrhoea did not fully benefit from the oral polio vaccine. So, community mobilisers started talking about the need for hand-washing, hygiene and sanitation, exclusive breastfeeding up to the age of six months, diarrhoea management with zinc and oral rehydration therapy, and routine immunisation, necessary to sustain the success of polio eradication. This holistic approach has paid off. India's polio campaign gathered momentum when it focused on marginalised and mobile people, and began working in earnest with religious leaders in Muslim communities to urge parents to immunise their children. For example, in Bihar in eastern India - once a polio hotspot in the country - a key focus of the polio programme is migrants. In recent years, continuous vaccination has been conducted at 51 transit locations at the state's international border with Nepal and 11 important railway stations. Bihar also saw special drives during popular festivals and fairs. While India appears to have stopped indigenous transmission of wild poliovirus, the risk of importation is real and has increased since 2013 with outbreaks in the Horn of Africa region and the Middle East, in addition to the continuing poliovirus transmission in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Nigeria. "India needs to stay extremely vigilant and continue its efforts to ensure that the children remain protected against polio, until the disease is eradicated globally," said Nicole Deutsch of Unicef. "India plans six polio campaigns in 2014 and 2015. In each campaign, 2.3 million vaccinators will immunise nearly 172 million children." India has also set up polio immunisation posts along the international borders with Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Burma and Bhutan to vaccinate all children up to the age of five years crossing the international borders. India's dramatic turnaround paves the way for polio-free certification of the entire South East Asia Region of the World Health Organization. The South-East Asia Regional Certification Commission for Polio Eradication (RCCPE) is expected to meet in Delhi in the last week of March 2014. "If the commission is convinced that there is no wild poliovirus in the region and the surveillance quality is good enough to pick up any wild poliovirus and phase 1 laboratory containment work has been completed, it will certify the South East Asia Region of WHO as polio-free," a WHO spokesperson told the BBC. India's successful control of polio has had other benefits. A health ministry official connected with India's National Polio Surveillance Project (NPSP), a collaboration between the government and the WHO, said strategies that worked in the case of polio were now being used to push up routine immunisation. This is good news. Too many Indian children still die because they do not get the vital vaccines. Patralekha Chatterjee is an independent Delhi-based journalist.

Here is a summary requirement:
Summarize the role of UNICEF in India's polio eradication efforts.

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

UNICEF played a crucial role in India's successful eradication of polio through its Social Mobilisation Network for polio, which was established in response to resistance against the polio vaccine. The network worked with community mobilizers to promote hand-washing, hygiene, sanitation, exclusive breastfeeding, diarrhoea management, and routine immunization. UNICEF also partnered with the Indian government, Rotary clubs, WHO, and millions of front-line workers to implement innovative strategies and micro-plans to cover the last mile in the battle against polio. UNICEF continues to support India's efforts to ensure that children remain protected against polio until the disease is eradicated globally.

UNICEF played a key role in India's successful efforts to eradicate polio. The charity provided support in the form of strategies to make polio vaccination more acceptable, such as working with religious leaders in Muslim communities to urge parents to immunise their children. UNICEF also set up the Social Mobilisation Network for polio in 2001 in northern Uttar Pradesh state, which focused on marginalised and mobile people. Additionally, UNICEF helped to introduce the bivalent oral polio vaccine in 2010, which protected against both type 1 and type 3 poliovirus transmission.


You are a helpful assistant in evaluating the quality of the outputs for a given instruction. Your goal is to select the best output for the given instruction.

Select the Output (a) or Output (b) that is better for the given instruction. The two outputs are generated by two different AI chatbots respectively.

Here are some rules of the evaluation:
(1) You should prioritize evaluating whether the output honestly/precisely/closely executes the instruction, then consider its helpfulness, accuracy, level of detail, harmlessness, etc.
(2) Outputs should NOT contain more/less than what the instruction asks for, as such outputs do NOT precisely execute the instruction.
(3) You should avoid any potential bias and your judgment should be as objective as possible. For example, the order in which the outputs were presented should NOT affect your judgment, as Output (a) and Output (b) are **equally likely** to be the better.

Do NOT provide any explanation for your choice.
Do NOT say both / neither are good.
You should answer using ONLY "Output (a)" or "Output (b)". Do NOT output any other words.

# Instruction:
Here is an article:
It is three years since India last reported a case of polio. Patralekha Chatterjee reports on how the country appears to have finally managed to beat the disease. Despite a healthcare system beset by severe problems, India has ushered in the new year with an achievement to be proud of. In 2009, India reported 741 polio cases, more than any other country in the world, according to the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. The last case was reported from the eastern state of West Bengal in 2011, when an 18-month-old girl was found to have contracted the disease. The country faced unique challenges in eradicating polio. Among them was the high population density and birth rate, poor sanitation, widespread diarrhoea, inaccessible terrain and reluctance of a section of the population, notably members of the Muslim community in certain pockets, to accept the polio vaccine. Nicole Deutsch, head of polio operations in India for UN children's charity Unicef, said: "Despite these obstacles, India proved to the world how to conquer this disease: through the strong commitment of the government, seamless partnership comprising the government, Rotary clubs, WHO and Unicef, and above all the tireless hard work of millions of front-line workers - vaccinators, social mobilisers and community and health workers - who continue to implement innovative strategies to rid India of polio," The introduction of bivalent oral polio vaccine in 2010 also helped India to battle the disease. Previously, India had been using a monovalent vaccine that protected only against type 1 poliovirus transmission, not type 3. which was causing repeated disease outbreaks. But it was organisation that was key in enabling India to cover the last mile in its battle against polio. In a vast country of more than a billion people who are culturally, economically, linguistically and socially diverse, "micro-plans" helped because they tossed up precious data about the specifics of a particular place - areas to be covered by each vaccination team on each day of the immunisation campaign, names and designations of the vaccinators, supervisors and community workers assigned to the area along with the vaccine, logistics distribution plan and so on. But data alone did not deliver results. Unicef set up the Social Mobilisation Network for polio in 2001 in northern Uttar Pradesh state. The initiative was a response to resistance against the polio vaccine. Families were refusing to immunise their children in some districts in Uttar Pradesh. There were many reasons why this happened - parents did not see polio as a risk; repeated immunisation rounds had created doubts in their minds; and some believed rumours that linked the polio vaccine to impotency. The Indian government and its polio partners realised that a new approach was needed. This led to strategies to make polio vaccination more acceptable among people who had been resisting it. 'Holistic' Children who suffered from severe bouts of diarrhoea did not fully benefit from the oral polio vaccine. So, community mobilisers started talking about the need for hand-washing, hygiene and sanitation, exclusive breastfeeding up to the age of six months, diarrhoea management with zinc and oral rehydration therapy, and routine immunisation, necessary to sustain the success of polio eradication. This holistic approach has paid off. India's polio campaign gathered momentum when it focused on marginalised and mobile people, and began working in earnest with religious leaders in Muslim communities to urge parents to immunise their children. For example, in Bihar in eastern India - once a polio hotspot in the country - a key focus of the polio programme is migrants. In recent years, continuous vaccination has been conducted at 51 transit locations at the state's international border with Nepal and 11 important railway stations. Bihar also saw special drives during popular festivals and fairs. While India appears to have stopped indigenous transmission of wild poliovirus, the risk of importation is real and has increased since 2013 with outbreaks in the Horn of Africa region and the Middle East, in addition to the continuing poliovirus transmission in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Nigeria. "India needs to stay extremely vigilant and continue its efforts to ensure that the children remain protected against polio, until the disease is eradicated globally," said Nicole Deutsch of Unicef. "India plans six polio campaigns in 2014 and 2015. In each campaign, 2.3 million vaccinators will immunise nearly 172 million children." India has also set up polio immunisation posts along the international borders with Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Burma and Bhutan to vaccinate all children up to the age of five years crossing the international borders. India's dramatic turnaround paves the way for polio-free certification of the entire South East Asia Region of the World Health Organization. The South-East Asia Regional Certification Commission for Polio Eradication (RCCPE) is expected to meet in Delhi in the last week of March 2014. "If the commission is convinced that there is no wild poliovirus in the region and the surveillance quality is good enough to pick up any wild poliovirus and phase 1 laboratory containment work has been completed, it will certify the South East Asia Region of WHO as polio-free," a WHO spokesperson told the BBC. India's successful control of polio has had other benefits. A health ministry official connected with India's National Polio Surveillance Project (NPSP), a collaboration between the government and the WHO, said strategies that worked in the case of polio were now being used to push up routine immunisation. This is good news. Too many Indian children still die because they do not get the vital vaccines. Patralekha Chatterjee is an independent Delhi-based journalist.

Here is a summary requirement:
Summarize the role of UNICEF in India's polio eradication efforts.

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

# Output (b):
UNICEF played a crucial role in India's polio eradication efforts by setting up the Social Mobilisation Network in 2001, which aimed to address resistance against the polio vaccine in certain areas. The organization worked closely with the Indian government, Rotary clubs, and the World Health Organization to implement innovative strategies and engage with communities, religious leaders, and marginalized populations.

# Output (a):
UNICEF played a crucial role in India's polio eradication efforts by setting up the Social Mobilisation Network in 2001, which aimed to address resistance against the polio vaccine in certain areas. The organization worked closely with the Indian government, Rotary clubs, and the World Health Organization to implement innovative strategies and engage with communities, religious leaders, and marginalized populations. UNICEF's holistic approach, which included promoting hand-washing, hygiene, sanitation, and routine immunization, contributed significantly to India's successful control of polio.

# Which is better, Output (a) or Output (b)? Your response should be either "Output (a)" or "Output (b)":

Output (a)

Instruction:
Here is an article:
It is three years since India last reported a case of polio. Patralekha Chatterjee reports on how the country appears to have finally managed to beat the disease. Despite a healthcare system beset by severe problems, India has ushered in the new year with an achievement to be proud of. In 2009, India reported 741 polio cases, more than any other country in the world, according to the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. The last case was reported from the eastern state of West Bengal in 2011, when an 18-month-old girl was found to have contracted the disease. The country faced unique challenges in eradicating polio. Among them was the high population density and birth rate, poor sanitation, widespread diarrhoea, inaccessible terrain and reluctance of a section of the population, notably members of the Muslim community in certain pockets, to accept the polio vaccine. Nicole Deutsch, head of polio operations in India for UN children's charity Unicef, said: "Despite these obstacles, India proved to the world how to conquer this disease: through the strong commitment of the government, seamless partnership comprising the government, Rotary clubs, WHO and Unicef, and above all the tireless hard work of millions of front-line workers - vaccinators, social mobilisers and community and health workers - who continue to implement innovative strategies to rid India of polio," The introduction of bivalent oral polio vaccine in 2010 also helped India to battle the disease. Previously, India had been using a monovalent vaccine that protected only against type 1 poliovirus transmission, not type 3. which was causing repeated disease outbreaks. But it was organisation that was key in enabling India to cover the last mile in its battle against polio. In a vast country of more than a billion people who are culturally, economically, linguistically and socially diverse, "micro-plans" helped because they tossed up precious data about the specifics of a particular place - areas to be covered by each vaccination team on each day of the immunisation campaign, names and designations of the vaccinators, supervisors and community workers assigned to the area along with the vaccine, logistics distribution plan and so on. But data alone did not deliver results. Unicef set up the Social Mobilisation Network for polio in 2001 in northern Uttar Pradesh state. The initiative was a response to resistance against the polio vaccine. Families were refusing to immunise their children in some districts in Uttar Pradesh. There were many reasons why this happened - parents did not see polio as a risk; repeated immunisation rounds had created doubts in their minds; and some believed rumours that linked the polio vaccine to impotency. The Indian government and its polio partners realised that a new approach was needed. This led to strategies to make polio vaccination more acceptable among people who had been resisting it. 'Holistic' Children who suffered from severe bouts of diarrhoea did not fully benefit from the oral polio vaccine. So, community mobilisers started talking about the need for hand-washing, hygiene and sanitation, exclusive breastfeeding up to the age of six months, diarrhoea management with zinc and oral rehydration therapy, and routine immunisation, necessary to sustain the success of polio eradication. This holistic approach has paid off. India's polio campaign gathered momentum when it focused on marginalised and mobile people, and began working in earnest with religious leaders in Muslim communities to urge parents to immunise their children. For example, in Bihar in eastern India - once a polio hotspot in the country - a key focus of the polio programme is migrants. In recent years, continuous vaccination has been conducted at 51 transit locations at the state's international border with Nepal and 11 important railway stations. Bihar also saw special drives during popular festivals and fairs. While India appears to have stopped indigenous transmission of wild poliovirus, the risk of importation is real and has increased since 2013 with outbreaks in the Horn of Africa region and the Middle East, in addition to the continuing poliovirus transmission in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Nigeria. "India needs to stay extremely vigilant and continue its efforts to ensure that the children remain protected against polio, until the disease is eradicated globally," said Nicole Deutsch of Unicef. "India plans six polio campaigns in 2014 and 2015. In each campaign, 2.3 million vaccinators will immunise nearly 172 million children." India has also set up polio immunisation posts along the international borders with Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, Burma and Bhutan to vaccinate all children up to the age of five years crossing the international borders. India's dramatic turnaround paves the way for polio-free certification of the entire South East Asia Region of the World Health Organization. The South-East Asia Regional Certification Commission for Polio Eradication (RCCPE) is expected to meet in Delhi in the last week of March 2014. "If the commission is convinced that there is no wild poliovirus in the region and the surveillance quality is good enough to pick up any wild poliovirus and phase 1 laboratory containment work has been completed, it will certify the South East Asia Region of WHO as polio-free," a WHO spokesperson told the BBC. India's successful control of polio has had other benefits. A health ministry official connected with India's National Polio Surveillance Project (NPSP), a collaboration between the government and the WHO, said strategies that worked in the case of polio were now being used to push up routine immunisation. This is good news. Too many Indian children still die because they do not get the vital vaccines. Patralekha Chatterjee is an independent Delhi-based journalist.

Here is a summary requirement:
Summarize the role of UNICEF in India's polio eradication efforts.

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

UNICEF played a crucial role in India's polio eradication efforts by setting up the Social Mobilisation Network in 2001, which aimed to address resistance against the polio vaccine in certain areas. The organization worked closely with the Indian government, Rotary clubs, and the World Health Organization to implement innovative strategies and engage with communities, religious leaders, and marginalized populations. UNICEF's holistic approach, which included promoting hand-washing, hygiene, sanitation, and routine immunization, contributed significantly to India's successful control of polio.


You are a helpful assistant in evaluating the quality of the outputs for a given instruction. Your goal is to select the best output for the given instruction.

Select the Output (a) or Output (b) that is better for the given instruction. The two outputs are generated by two different AI chatbots respectively.

Here are some rules of the evaluation:
(1) You should prioritize evaluating whether the output honestly/precisely/closely executes the instruction, then consider its helpfulness, accuracy, level of detail, harmlessness, etc.
(2) Outputs should NOT contain more/less than what the instruction asks for, as such outputs do NOT precisely execute the instruction.
(3) You should avoid any potential bias and your judgment should be as objective as possible. For example, the order in which the outputs were presented should NOT affect your judgment, as Output (a) and Output (b) are **equally likely** to be the better.

Do NOT provide any explanation for your choice.
Do NOT say both / neither are good.
You should answer using ONLY "Output (a)" or "Output (b)". Do NOT output any other words.

# Instruction:
Here is an article:
Malta is the only country in the EU where abortion remains illegal, and is still a taboo subject for many. But now, a ground-breaking play featuring local voices from both sides of the debate is trying to change that. By Mario Cacciottolo Malta It is estimated that hundreds of women leave Malta each year to have an abortion overseas, usually in the UK or Italy. Others illegally buy abortion pills online. Their stories inspired Maltese journalist Herman Grech to write and direct a play called De-terminated. Its script is based on the real-life experiences of abortion of seven people, both women and men, and it premieres in Valletta on Friday night. Tackling taboos "Abortion is not only a taboo here, there's almost a fear of using the 'A' word," said Grech, a prominent Maltese journalist and occasional contributor to the BBC. "When you know hundreds of women are resorting to dangerous methods to get a termination then it becomes a subject that needs to be tackled." One character has had her profession changed in the play, because her real-life counterpart says she would lose her job if the Maltese authorities discovered she had an abortion abroad. Another is based on a man who was sexually abused as a child, became promiscuous, later coerced his pregnant girlfriend into terminating their child, then found God, and now campaigns against abortion. Grech says he didn't write the play to campaign for either side. "In Malta there are only ever two sides to choose from... everything's yes or no, there are no shades of grey," he says. "Stop shouting at each other, and maybe we can actually have a debate about this." A Maltese woman's abortion experience in UK "The abortion hit on the train, after I left the clinic. I literally thought I was bleeding to death. I passed out from the pain on the train, alone." A Maltese woman in her mid-30s, Roberta became pregnant about 10 years ago when her boyfriend's condom split. She flew to a clinic in Birmingham, UK, where she paid €1,000 (£880) for pills to induce a medical abortion. "When I got off the train and to my hotel, I thought I was dying. I thought something had gone wrong," says Roberta - not her real name. "The hotel room looked like the scene of a murder. Blood on everything, projectile vomiting. Again, I'm completely on my own." When she returned to Malta, she bled for 40 days. Her "very religious" gynaecologist told her she had "committed a crime" and should be reported. Malta has a "double effect" law, allowing essential treatment of a sick mother with side effects that may harm the foetus - such as cancer therapy. But the foetus cannot be terminated just to save the mother. Deliberately terminating a pregnancy carries a prison sentence of up to three years. The morning-after pill only became legally available in Malta in December 2016 after a bitter battle that saw death threats made against those calling for the change. 'Holding society back' Lara Dimitrijevic is founder and director of the Women's Rights Foundation (WRF), which is calling for the decriminalisation of abortion in Malta. "It's a breach of the fundamental human rights based on gender discrimination, because it's targeting women and girls," she says. WRF says that in the space of five years 465 women living in Malta tried to buy abortion pills online from a single source. And a local politician has claimed that 300-400 women go abroad for this procedure each year. "This is holding Maltese society back," Ms Dimitrijevic said. "It's holding women back specifically." The Church maintains a great deal of influence in a country that teaches abstinence as its only sexual education, she complains, adding that politicians are afraid to endorse abortion. She hopes the De-terminated play will be a "softer way" to discuss the issue. Women's lives ' safeguarded by law' On the other side of the debate is Klaus Vella Bardon, deputy chairman of the LifeNetwork Foundation Malta. Malta should not even debate the issue, he argues, because that would be "a step towards making it socially acceptable". And he does not believe that the Maltese people are in favour - saying recent liberal reforms were "imposed from the top down" without necessarily being publicly popular, with the exception of divorce which was decided by referendum. "It's codswallop to say a sick pregnant woman is put at risk in Malta. Their lives are safeguarded in Maltese law," he says pointing to the "double effect" rules. "It's the woman and the family's choice. Some women have accepted no treatment or to risk having it later, because they want the child to have a shot at life." When it comes to rape, Mr Vella Bardon says that while it is a "horrible crime, why should the child be sacrificed?" "As a society we're against the death penalty, even for those who commit gratuitous murders, but why do we then accept killing a child?" He also has tickets for De-terminated, which he expects to be a "civil presentation of both points of view". Despite Grech's efforts to provoke debate through staging a play, he does not expect to see abortion introduced within his lifetime. "Women go to the UK for abortions and come back bleeding. There should be help available for them here," he said. "Despite our strict laws, abortions still happen. People should be discussing this issue. Let's try to understand each other." Additional reporting by Diana Cacciottolo.

Here is a summary requirement:
Summarize why Bardon is against abortion as mentioned in this article in one sentence

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

# Output (b):
Bardon is against abortion because it is a "horrible crime" and the child should not be sacrificed.

# Output (a):
Klaus Vella Bardon is against abortion because he believes that the lives of sick pregnant women are safeguarded by Maltese law and that the child should not be sacrificed, even in cases of rape.

# Which is better, Output (a) or Output (b)? Your response should be either "Output (a)" or "Output (b)":

Output (a)

Instruction:
Here is an article:
Malta is the only country in the EU where abortion remains illegal, and is still a taboo subject for many. But now, a ground-breaking play featuring local voices from both sides of the debate is trying to change that. By Mario Cacciottolo Malta It is estimated that hundreds of women leave Malta each year to have an abortion overseas, usually in the UK or Italy. Others illegally buy abortion pills online. Their stories inspired Maltese journalist Herman Grech to write and direct a play called De-terminated. Its script is based on the real-life experiences of abortion of seven people, both women and men, and it premieres in Valletta on Friday night. Tackling taboos "Abortion is not only a taboo here, there's almost a fear of using the 'A' word," said Grech, a prominent Maltese journalist and occasional contributor to the BBC. "When you know hundreds of women are resorting to dangerous methods to get a termination then it becomes a subject that needs to be tackled." One character has had her profession changed in the play, because her real-life counterpart says she would lose her job if the Maltese authorities discovered she had an abortion abroad. Another is based on a man who was sexually abused as a child, became promiscuous, later coerced his pregnant girlfriend into terminating their child, then found God, and now campaigns against abortion. Grech says he didn't write the play to campaign for either side. "In Malta there are only ever two sides to choose from... everything's yes or no, there are no shades of grey," he says. "Stop shouting at each other, and maybe we can actually have a debate about this." A Maltese woman's abortion experience in UK "The abortion hit on the train, after I left the clinic. I literally thought I was bleeding to death. I passed out from the pain on the train, alone." A Maltese woman in her mid-30s, Roberta became pregnant about 10 years ago when her boyfriend's condom split. She flew to a clinic in Birmingham, UK, where she paid €1,000 (£880) for pills to induce a medical abortion. "When I got off the train and to my hotel, I thought I was dying. I thought something had gone wrong," says Roberta - not her real name. "The hotel room looked like the scene of a murder. Blood on everything, projectile vomiting. Again, I'm completely on my own." When she returned to Malta, she bled for 40 days. Her "very religious" gynaecologist told her she had "committed a crime" and should be reported. Malta has a "double effect" law, allowing essential treatment of a sick mother with side effects that may harm the foetus - such as cancer therapy. But the foetus cannot be terminated just to save the mother. Deliberately terminating a pregnancy carries a prison sentence of up to three years. The morning-after pill only became legally available in Malta in December 2016 after a bitter battle that saw death threats made against those calling for the change. 'Holding society back' Lara Dimitrijevic is founder and director of the Women's Rights Foundation (WRF), which is calling for the decriminalisation of abortion in Malta. "It's a breach of the fundamental human rights based on gender discrimination, because it's targeting women and girls," she says. WRF says that in the space of five years 465 women living in Malta tried to buy abortion pills online from a single source. And a local politician has claimed that 300-400 women go abroad for this procedure each year. "This is holding Maltese society back," Ms Dimitrijevic said. "It's holding women back specifically." The Church maintains a great deal of influence in a country that teaches abstinence as its only sexual education, she complains, adding that politicians are afraid to endorse abortion. She hopes the De-terminated play will be a "softer way" to discuss the issue. Women's lives ' safeguarded by law' On the other side of the debate is Klaus Vella Bardon, deputy chairman of the LifeNetwork Foundation Malta. Malta should not even debate the issue, he argues, because that would be "a step towards making it socially acceptable". And he does not believe that the Maltese people are in favour - saying recent liberal reforms were "imposed from the top down" without necessarily being publicly popular, with the exception of divorce which was decided by referendum. "It's codswallop to say a sick pregnant woman is put at risk in Malta. Their lives are safeguarded in Maltese law," he says pointing to the "double effect" rules. "It's the woman and the family's choice. Some women have accepted no treatment or to risk having it later, because they want the child to have a shot at life." When it comes to rape, Mr Vella Bardon says that while it is a "horrible crime, why should the child be sacrificed?" "As a society we're against the death penalty, even for those who commit gratuitous murders, but why do we then accept killing a child?" He also has tickets for De-terminated, which he expects to be a "civil presentation of both points of view". Despite Grech's efforts to provoke debate through staging a play, he does not expect to see abortion introduced within his lifetime. "Women go to the UK for abortions and come back bleeding. There should be help available for them here," he said. "Despite our strict laws, abortions still happen. People should be discussing this issue. Let's try to understand each other." Additional reporting by Diana Cacciottolo.

Here is a summary requirement:
Summarize why Bardon is against abortion as mentioned in this article in one sentence

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

Klaus Vella Bardon is against abortion because he believes that the lives of sick pregnant women are safeguarded by Maltese law and that the child should not be sacrificed, even in cases of rape.

Bardon is against abortion because it is a "horrible crime" and the child should not be sacrificed.


You are a helpful assistant in evaluating the quality of the outputs for a given instruction. Your goal is to select the best output for the given instruction.

Select the Output (a) or Output (b) that is better for the given instruction. The two outputs are generated by two different AI chatbots respectively.

Here are some rules of the evaluation:
(1) You should prioritize evaluating whether the output honestly/precisely/closely executes the instruction, then consider its helpfulness, accuracy, level of detail, harmlessness, etc.
(2) Outputs should NOT contain more/less than what the instruction asks for, as such outputs do NOT precisely execute the instruction.
(3) You should avoid any potential bias and your judgment should be as objective as possible. For example, the order in which the outputs were presented should NOT affect your judgment, as Output (a) and Output (b) are **equally likely** to be the better.

Do NOT provide any explanation for your choice.
Do NOT say both / neither are good.
You should answer using ONLY "Output (a)" or "Output (b)". Do NOT output any other words.

# Instruction:
Here is an article:
Malta is the only country in the EU where abortion remains illegal, and is still a taboo subject for many. But now, a ground-breaking play featuring local voices from both sides of the debate is trying to change that. By Mario Cacciottolo Malta It is estimated that hundreds of women leave Malta each year to have an abortion overseas, usually in the UK or Italy. Others illegally buy abortion pills online. Their stories inspired Maltese journalist Herman Grech to write and direct a play called De-terminated. Its script is based on the real-life experiences of abortion of seven people, both women and men, and it premieres in Valletta on Friday night. Tackling taboos "Abortion is not only a taboo here, there's almost a fear of using the 'A' word," said Grech, a prominent Maltese journalist and occasional contributor to the BBC. "When you know hundreds of women are resorting to dangerous methods to get a termination then it becomes a subject that needs to be tackled." One character has had her profession changed in the play, because her real-life counterpart says she would lose her job if the Maltese authorities discovered she had an abortion abroad. Another is based on a man who was sexually abused as a child, became promiscuous, later coerced his pregnant girlfriend into terminating their child, then found God, and now campaigns against abortion. Grech says he didn't write the play to campaign for either side. "In Malta there are only ever two sides to choose from... everything's yes or no, there are no shades of grey," he says. "Stop shouting at each other, and maybe we can actually have a debate about this." A Maltese woman's abortion experience in UK "The abortion hit on the train, after I left the clinic. I literally thought I was bleeding to death. I passed out from the pain on the train, alone." A Maltese woman in her mid-30s, Roberta became pregnant about 10 years ago when her boyfriend's condom split. She flew to a clinic in Birmingham, UK, where she paid €1,000 (£880) for pills to induce a medical abortion. "When I got off the train and to my hotel, I thought I was dying. I thought something had gone wrong," says Roberta - not her real name. "The hotel room looked like the scene of a murder. Blood on everything, projectile vomiting. Again, I'm completely on my own." When she returned to Malta, she bled for 40 days. Her "very religious" gynaecologist told her she had "committed a crime" and should be reported. Malta has a "double effect" law, allowing essential treatment of a sick mother with side effects that may harm the foetus - such as cancer therapy. But the foetus cannot be terminated just to save the mother. Deliberately terminating a pregnancy carries a prison sentence of up to three years. The morning-after pill only became legally available in Malta in December 2016 after a bitter battle that saw death threats made against those calling for the change. 'Holding society back' Lara Dimitrijevic is founder and director of the Women's Rights Foundation (WRF), which is calling for the decriminalisation of abortion in Malta. "It's a breach of the fundamental human rights based on gender discrimination, because it's targeting women and girls," she says. WRF says that in the space of five years 465 women living in Malta tried to buy abortion pills online from a single source. And a local politician has claimed that 300-400 women go abroad for this procedure each year. "This is holding Maltese society back," Ms Dimitrijevic said. "It's holding women back specifically." The Church maintains a great deal of influence in a country that teaches abstinence as its only sexual education, she complains, adding that politicians are afraid to endorse abortion. She hopes the De-terminated play will be a "softer way" to discuss the issue. Women's lives ' safeguarded by law' On the other side of the debate is Klaus Vella Bardon, deputy chairman of the LifeNetwork Foundation Malta. Malta should not even debate the issue, he argues, because that would be "a step towards making it socially acceptable". And he does not believe that the Maltese people are in favour - saying recent liberal reforms were "imposed from the top down" without necessarily being publicly popular, with the exception of divorce which was decided by referendum. "It's codswallop to say a sick pregnant woman is put at risk in Malta. Their lives are safeguarded in Maltese law," he says pointing to the "double effect" rules. "It's the woman and the family's choice. Some women have accepted no treatment or to risk having it later, because they want the child to have a shot at life." When it comes to rape, Mr Vella Bardon says that while it is a "horrible crime, why should the child be sacrificed?" "As a society we're against the death penalty, even for those who commit gratuitous murders, but why do we then accept killing a child?" He also has tickets for De-terminated, which he expects to be a "civil presentation of both points of view". Despite Grech's efforts to provoke debate through staging a play, he does not expect to see abortion introduced within his lifetime. "Women go to the UK for abortions and come back bleeding. There should be help available for them here," he said. "Despite our strict laws, abortions still happen. People should be discussing this issue. Let's try to understand each other." Additional reporting by Diana Cacciottolo.

Here is a summary requirement:
Summarize why Bardon is against abortion as mentioned in this article in one sentence

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

# Output (b):
Bardon is against abortion because it is a "horrible crime" and the child should not be sacrificed.

# Output (a):
Klaus Vella Bardon, deputy chairman of the LifeNetwork Foundation Malta, is against abortion because he believes it is not socially acceptable, Maltese law safeguards the lives of sick pregnant women, and the child should not be sacrificed in cases of rape.

# Which is better, Output (a) or Output (b)? Your response should be either "Output (a)" or "Output (b)":

Output (a)

Instruction:
Here is an article:
Malta is the only country in the EU where abortion remains illegal, and is still a taboo subject for many. But now, a ground-breaking play featuring local voices from both sides of the debate is trying to change that. By Mario Cacciottolo Malta It is estimated that hundreds of women leave Malta each year to have an abortion overseas, usually in the UK or Italy. Others illegally buy abortion pills online. Their stories inspired Maltese journalist Herman Grech to write and direct a play called De-terminated. Its script is based on the real-life experiences of abortion of seven people, both women and men, and it premieres in Valletta on Friday night. Tackling taboos "Abortion is not only a taboo here, there's almost a fear of using the 'A' word," said Grech, a prominent Maltese journalist and occasional contributor to the BBC. "When you know hundreds of women are resorting to dangerous methods to get a termination then it becomes a subject that needs to be tackled." One character has had her profession changed in the play, because her real-life counterpart says she would lose her job if the Maltese authorities discovered she had an abortion abroad. Another is based on a man who was sexually abused as a child, became promiscuous, later coerced his pregnant girlfriend into terminating their child, then found God, and now campaigns against abortion. Grech says he didn't write the play to campaign for either side. "In Malta there are only ever two sides to choose from... everything's yes or no, there are no shades of grey," he says. "Stop shouting at each other, and maybe we can actually have a debate about this." A Maltese woman's abortion experience in UK "The abortion hit on the train, after I left the clinic. I literally thought I was bleeding to death. I passed out from the pain on the train, alone." A Maltese woman in her mid-30s, Roberta became pregnant about 10 years ago when her boyfriend's condom split. She flew to a clinic in Birmingham, UK, where she paid €1,000 (£880) for pills to induce a medical abortion. "When I got off the train and to my hotel, I thought I was dying. I thought something had gone wrong," says Roberta - not her real name. "The hotel room looked like the scene of a murder. Blood on everything, projectile vomiting. Again, I'm completely on my own." When she returned to Malta, she bled for 40 days. Her "very religious" gynaecologist told her she had "committed a crime" and should be reported. Malta has a "double effect" law, allowing essential treatment of a sick mother with side effects that may harm the foetus - such as cancer therapy. But the foetus cannot be terminated just to save the mother. Deliberately terminating a pregnancy carries a prison sentence of up to three years. The morning-after pill only became legally available in Malta in December 2016 after a bitter battle that saw death threats made against those calling for the change. 'Holding society back' Lara Dimitrijevic is founder and director of the Women's Rights Foundation (WRF), which is calling for the decriminalisation of abortion in Malta. "It's a breach of the fundamental human rights based on gender discrimination, because it's targeting women and girls," she says. WRF says that in the space of five years 465 women living in Malta tried to buy abortion pills online from a single source. And a local politician has claimed that 300-400 women go abroad for this procedure each year. "This is holding Maltese society back," Ms Dimitrijevic said. "It's holding women back specifically." The Church maintains a great deal of influence in a country that teaches abstinence as its only sexual education, she complains, adding that politicians are afraid to endorse abortion. She hopes the De-terminated play will be a "softer way" to discuss the issue. Women's lives ' safeguarded by law' On the other side of the debate is Klaus Vella Bardon, deputy chairman of the LifeNetwork Foundation Malta. Malta should not even debate the issue, he argues, because that would be "a step towards making it socially acceptable". And he does not believe that the Maltese people are in favour - saying recent liberal reforms were "imposed from the top down" without necessarily being publicly popular, with the exception of divorce which was decided by referendum. "It's codswallop to say a sick pregnant woman is put at risk in Malta. Their lives are safeguarded in Maltese law," he says pointing to the "double effect" rules. "It's the woman and the family's choice. Some women have accepted no treatment or to risk having it later, because they want the child to have a shot at life." When it comes to rape, Mr Vella Bardon says that while it is a "horrible crime, why should the child be sacrificed?" "As a society we're against the death penalty, even for those who commit gratuitous murders, but why do we then accept killing a child?" He also has tickets for De-terminated, which he expects to be a "civil presentation of both points of view". Despite Grech's efforts to provoke debate through staging a play, he does not expect to see abortion introduced within his lifetime. "Women go to the UK for abortions and come back bleeding. There should be help available for them here," he said. "Despite our strict laws, abortions still happen. People should be discussing this issue. Let's try to understand each other." Additional reporting by Diana Cacciottolo.

Here is a summary requirement:
Summarize why Bardon is against abortion as mentioned in this article in one sentence

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

Klaus Vella Bardon, deputy chairman of the LifeNetwork Foundation Malta, is against abortion because he believes it is not socially acceptable, Maltese law safeguards the lives of sick pregnant women, and the child should not be sacrificed in cases of rape.

Bardon is against abortion because it is a "horrible crime" and the child should not be sacrificed.


You are a helpful assistant in evaluating the quality of the outputs for a given instruction. Your goal is to select the best output for the given instruction.

Select the Output (a) or Output (b) that is better for the given instruction. The two outputs are generated by two different AI chatbots respectively.

Here are some rules of the evaluation:
(1) You should prioritize evaluating whether the output honestly/precisely/closely executes the instruction, then consider its helpfulness, accuracy, level of detail, harmlessness, etc.
(2) Outputs should NOT contain more/less than what the instruction asks for, as such outputs do NOT precisely execute the instruction.
(3) You should avoid any potential bias and your judgment should be as objective as possible. For example, the order in which the outputs were presented should NOT affect your judgment, as Output (a) and Output (b) are **equally likely** to be the better.

Do NOT provide any explanation for your choice.
Do NOT say both / neither are good.
You should answer using ONLY "Output (a)" or "Output (b)". Do NOT output any other words.

# Instruction:
Here is an article:
Malta is the only country in the EU where abortion remains illegal, and is still a taboo subject for many. But now, a ground-breaking play featuring local voices from both sides of the debate is trying to change that. By Mario Cacciottolo Malta It is estimated that hundreds of women leave Malta each year to have an abortion overseas, usually in the UK or Italy. Others illegally buy abortion pills online. Their stories inspired Maltese journalist Herman Grech to write and direct a play called De-terminated. Its script is based on the real-life experiences of abortion of seven people, both women and men, and it premieres in Valletta on Friday night. Tackling taboos "Abortion is not only a taboo here, there's almost a fear of using the 'A' word," said Grech, a prominent Maltese journalist and occasional contributor to the BBC. "When you know hundreds of women are resorting to dangerous methods to get a termination then it becomes a subject that needs to be tackled." One character has had her profession changed in the play, because her real-life counterpart says she would lose her job if the Maltese authorities discovered she had an abortion abroad. Another is based on a man who was sexually abused as a child, became promiscuous, later coerced his pregnant girlfriend into terminating their child, then found God, and now campaigns against abortion. Grech says he didn't write the play to campaign for either side. "In Malta there are only ever two sides to choose from... everything's yes or no, there are no shades of grey," he says. "Stop shouting at each other, and maybe we can actually have a debate about this." A Maltese woman's abortion experience in UK "The abortion hit on the train, after I left the clinic. I literally thought I was bleeding to death. I passed out from the pain on the train, alone." A Maltese woman in her mid-30s, Roberta became pregnant about 10 years ago when her boyfriend's condom split. She flew to a clinic in Birmingham, UK, where she paid €1,000 (£880) for pills to induce a medical abortion. "When I got off the train and to my hotel, I thought I was dying. I thought something had gone wrong," says Roberta - not her real name. "The hotel room looked like the scene of a murder. Blood on everything, projectile vomiting. Again, I'm completely on my own." When she returned to Malta, she bled for 40 days. Her "very religious" gynaecologist told her she had "committed a crime" and should be reported. Malta has a "double effect" law, allowing essential treatment of a sick mother with side effects that may harm the foetus - such as cancer therapy. But the foetus cannot be terminated just to save the mother. Deliberately terminating a pregnancy carries a prison sentence of up to three years. The morning-after pill only became legally available in Malta in December 2016 after a bitter battle that saw death threats made against those calling for the change. 'Holding society back' Lara Dimitrijevic is founder and director of the Women's Rights Foundation (WRF), which is calling for the decriminalisation of abortion in Malta. "It's a breach of the fundamental human rights based on gender discrimination, because it's targeting women and girls," she says. WRF says that in the space of five years 465 women living in Malta tried to buy abortion pills online from a single source. And a local politician has claimed that 300-400 women go abroad for this procedure each year. "This is holding Maltese society back," Ms Dimitrijevic said. "It's holding women back specifically." The Church maintains a great deal of influence in a country that teaches abstinence as its only sexual education, she complains, adding that politicians are afraid to endorse abortion. She hopes the De-terminated play will be a "softer way" to discuss the issue. Women's lives ' safeguarded by law' On the other side of the debate is Klaus Vella Bardon, deputy chairman of the LifeNetwork Foundation Malta. Malta should not even debate the issue, he argues, because that would be "a step towards making it socially acceptable". And he does not believe that the Maltese people are in favour - saying recent liberal reforms were "imposed from the top down" without necessarily being publicly popular, with the exception of divorce which was decided by referendum. "It's codswallop to say a sick pregnant woman is put at risk in Malta. Their lives are safeguarded in Maltese law," he says pointing to the "double effect" rules. "It's the woman and the family's choice. Some women have accepted no treatment or to risk having it later, because they want the child to have a shot at life." When it comes to rape, Mr Vella Bardon says that while it is a "horrible crime, why should the child be sacrificed?" "As a society we're against the death penalty, even for those who commit gratuitous murders, but why do we then accept killing a child?" He also has tickets for De-terminated, which he expects to be a "civil presentation of both points of view". Despite Grech's efforts to provoke debate through staging a play, he does not expect to see abortion introduced within his lifetime. "Women go to the UK for abortions and come back bleeding. There should be help available for them here," he said. "Despite our strict laws, abortions still happen. People should be discussing this issue. Let's try to understand each other." Additional reporting by Diana Cacciottolo.

Here is a summary requirement:
Summarize why Bardon is against abortion as mentioned in this article in one sentence

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

# Output (b):
Bardon is against abortion because it is a "horrible crime" and the child should not be sacrificed.

# Output (a):
Klaus Vella Bardon is against abortion because he believes that the lives of sick pregnant women are safeguarded by Maltese law and that the child should not be sacrificed, even in cases of rape.

# Which is better, Output (a) or Output (b)? Your response should be either "Output (a)" or "Output (b)":

Output (a)

Instruction:
Here is an article:
Malta is the only country in the EU where abortion remains illegal, and is still a taboo subject for many. But now, a ground-breaking play featuring local voices from both sides of the debate is trying to change that. By Mario Cacciottolo Malta It is estimated that hundreds of women leave Malta each year to have an abortion overseas, usually in the UK or Italy. Others illegally buy abortion pills online. Their stories inspired Maltese journalist Herman Grech to write and direct a play called De-terminated. Its script is based on the real-life experiences of abortion of seven people, both women and men, and it premieres in Valletta on Friday night. Tackling taboos "Abortion is not only a taboo here, there's almost a fear of using the 'A' word," said Grech, a prominent Maltese journalist and occasional contributor to the BBC. "When you know hundreds of women are resorting to dangerous methods to get a termination then it becomes a subject that needs to be tackled." One character has had her profession changed in the play, because her real-life counterpart says she would lose her job if the Maltese authorities discovered she had an abortion abroad. Another is based on a man who was sexually abused as a child, became promiscuous, later coerced his pregnant girlfriend into terminating their child, then found God, and now campaigns against abortion. Grech says he didn't write the play to campaign for either side. "In Malta there are only ever two sides to choose from... everything's yes or no, there are no shades of grey," he says. "Stop shouting at each other, and maybe we can actually have a debate about this." A Maltese woman's abortion experience in UK "The abortion hit on the train, after I left the clinic. I literally thought I was bleeding to death. I passed out from the pain on the train, alone." A Maltese woman in her mid-30s, Roberta became pregnant about 10 years ago when her boyfriend's condom split. She flew to a clinic in Birmingham, UK, where she paid €1,000 (£880) for pills to induce a medical abortion. "When I got off the train and to my hotel, I thought I was dying. I thought something had gone wrong," says Roberta - not her real name. "The hotel room looked like the scene of a murder. Blood on everything, projectile vomiting. Again, I'm completely on my own." When she returned to Malta, she bled for 40 days. Her "very religious" gynaecologist told her she had "committed a crime" and should be reported. Malta has a "double effect" law, allowing essential treatment of a sick mother with side effects that may harm the foetus - such as cancer therapy. But the foetus cannot be terminated just to save the mother. Deliberately terminating a pregnancy carries a prison sentence of up to three years. The morning-after pill only became legally available in Malta in December 2016 after a bitter battle that saw death threats made against those calling for the change. 'Holding society back' Lara Dimitrijevic is founder and director of the Women's Rights Foundation (WRF), which is calling for the decriminalisation of abortion in Malta. "It's a breach of the fundamental human rights based on gender discrimination, because it's targeting women and girls," she says. WRF says that in the space of five years 465 women living in Malta tried to buy abortion pills online from a single source. And a local politician has claimed that 300-400 women go abroad for this procedure each year. "This is holding Maltese society back," Ms Dimitrijevic said. "It's holding women back specifically." The Church maintains a great deal of influence in a country that teaches abstinence as its only sexual education, she complains, adding that politicians are afraid to endorse abortion. She hopes the De-terminated play will be a "softer way" to discuss the issue. Women's lives ' safeguarded by law' On the other side of the debate is Klaus Vella Bardon, deputy chairman of the LifeNetwork Foundation Malta. Malta should not even debate the issue, he argues, because that would be "a step towards making it socially acceptable". And he does not believe that the Maltese people are in favour - saying recent liberal reforms were "imposed from the top down" without necessarily being publicly popular, with the exception of divorce which was decided by referendum. "It's codswallop to say a sick pregnant woman is put at risk in Malta. Their lives are safeguarded in Maltese law," he says pointing to the "double effect" rules. "It's the woman and the family's choice. Some women have accepted no treatment or to risk having it later, because they want the child to have a shot at life." When it comes to rape, Mr Vella Bardon says that while it is a "horrible crime, why should the child be sacrificed?" "As a society we're against the death penalty, even for those who commit gratuitous murders, but why do we then accept killing a child?" He also has tickets for De-terminated, which he expects to be a "civil presentation of both points of view". Despite Grech's efforts to provoke debate through staging a play, he does not expect to see abortion introduced within his lifetime. "Women go to the UK for abortions and come back bleeding. There should be help available for them here," he said. "Despite our strict laws, abortions still happen. People should be discussing this issue. Let's try to understand each other." Additional reporting by Diana Cacciottolo.

Here is a summary requirement:
Summarize why Bardon is against abortion as mentioned in this article in one sentence

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

Klaus Vella Bardon is against abortion because he believes that the lives of sick pregnant women are safeguarded by Maltese law and that the child should not be sacrificed, even in cases of rape.

Bardon is against abortion because it is a "horrible crime" and the child should not be sacrificed.


You are a helpful assistant in evaluating the quality of the outputs for a given instruction. Your goal is to select the best output for the given instruction.

Select the Output (a) or Output (b) that is better for the given instruction. The two outputs are generated by two different AI chatbots respectively.

Here are some rules of the evaluation:
(1) You should prioritize evaluating whether the output honestly/precisely/closely executes the instruction, then consider its helpfulness, accuracy, level of detail, harmlessness, etc.
(2) Outputs should NOT contain more/less than what the instruction asks for, as such outputs do NOT precisely execute the instruction.
(3) You should avoid any potential bias and your judgment should be as objective as possible. For example, the order in which the outputs were presented should NOT affect your judgment, as Output (a) and Output (b) are **equally likely** to be the better.

Do NOT provide any explanation for your choice.
Do NOT say both / neither are good.
You should answer using ONLY "Output (a)" or "Output (b)". Do NOT output any other words.

# Instruction:
Here is an article:
Malta is the only country in the EU where abortion remains illegal, and is still a taboo subject for many. But now, a ground-breaking play featuring local voices from both sides of the debate is trying to change that. By Mario Cacciottolo Malta It is estimated that hundreds of women leave Malta each year to have an abortion overseas, usually in the UK or Italy. Others illegally buy abortion pills online. Their stories inspired Maltese journalist Herman Grech to write and direct a play called De-terminated. Its script is based on the real-life experiences of abortion of seven people, both women and men, and it premieres in Valletta on Friday night. Tackling taboos "Abortion is not only a taboo here, there's almost a fear of using the 'A' word," said Grech, a prominent Maltese journalist and occasional contributor to the BBC. "When you know hundreds of women are resorting to dangerous methods to get a termination then it becomes a subject that needs to be tackled." One character has had her profession changed in the play, because her real-life counterpart says she would lose her job if the Maltese authorities discovered she had an abortion abroad. Another is based on a man who was sexually abused as a child, became promiscuous, later coerced his pregnant girlfriend into terminating their child, then found God, and now campaigns against abortion. Grech says he didn't write the play to campaign for either side. "In Malta there are only ever two sides to choose from... everything's yes or no, there are no shades of grey," he says. "Stop shouting at each other, and maybe we can actually have a debate about this." A Maltese woman's abortion experience in UK "The abortion hit on the train, after I left the clinic. I literally thought I was bleeding to death. I passed out from the pain on the train, alone." A Maltese woman in her mid-30s, Roberta became pregnant about 10 years ago when her boyfriend's condom split. She flew to a clinic in Birmingham, UK, where she paid €1,000 (£880) for pills to induce a medical abortion. "When I got off the train and to my hotel, I thought I was dying. I thought something had gone wrong," says Roberta - not her real name. "The hotel room looked like the scene of a murder. Blood on everything, projectile vomiting. Again, I'm completely on my own." When she returned to Malta, she bled for 40 days. Her "very religious" gynaecologist told her she had "committed a crime" and should be reported. Malta has a "double effect" law, allowing essential treatment of a sick mother with side effects that may harm the foetus - such as cancer therapy. But the foetus cannot be terminated just to save the mother. Deliberately terminating a pregnancy carries a prison sentence of up to three years. The morning-after pill only became legally available in Malta in December 2016 after a bitter battle that saw death threats made against those calling for the change. 'Holding society back' Lara Dimitrijevic is founder and director of the Women's Rights Foundation (WRF), which is calling for the decriminalisation of abortion in Malta. "It's a breach of the fundamental human rights based on gender discrimination, because it's targeting women and girls," she says. WRF says that in the space of five years 465 women living in Malta tried to buy abortion pills online from a single source. And a local politician has claimed that 300-400 women go abroad for this procedure each year. "This is holding Maltese society back," Ms Dimitrijevic said. "It's holding women back specifically." The Church maintains a great deal of influence in a country that teaches abstinence as its only sexual education, she complains, adding that politicians are afraid to endorse abortion. She hopes the De-terminated play will be a "softer way" to discuss the issue. Women's lives ' safeguarded by law' On the other side of the debate is Klaus Vella Bardon, deputy chairman of the LifeNetwork Foundation Malta. Malta should not even debate the issue, he argues, because that would be "a step towards making it socially acceptable". And he does not believe that the Maltese people are in favour - saying recent liberal reforms were "imposed from the top down" without necessarily being publicly popular, with the exception of divorce which was decided by referendum. "It's codswallop to say a sick pregnant woman is put at risk in Malta. Their lives are safeguarded in Maltese law," he says pointing to the "double effect" rules. "It's the woman and the family's choice. Some women have accepted no treatment or to risk having it later, because they want the child to have a shot at life." When it comes to rape, Mr Vella Bardon says that while it is a "horrible crime, why should the child be sacrificed?" "As a society we're against the death penalty, even for those who commit gratuitous murders, but why do we then accept killing a child?" He also has tickets for De-terminated, which he expects to be a "civil presentation of both points of view". Despite Grech's efforts to provoke debate through staging a play, he does not expect to see abortion introduced within his lifetime. "Women go to the UK for abortions and come back bleeding. There should be help available for them here," he said. "Despite our strict laws, abortions still happen. People should be discussing this issue. Let's try to understand each other." Additional reporting by Diana Cacciottolo.

Here is a summary requirement:
Summarize why Bardon is against abortion as mentioned in this article in one sentence

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

# Output (b):
Bardon is against abortion because he believes that the child should not be sacrificed, even in cases of rape, and that society should not accept killing a child.

# Output (a):
Klaus Vella Bardon is against abortion because he believes that the lives of sick pregnant women are safeguarded by Maltese law and that the child should not be sacrificed, even in cases of rape.

# Which is better, Output (a) or Output (b)? Your response should be either "Output (a)" or "Output (b)":

Output (a)

Instruction:
Here is an article:
Malta is the only country in the EU where abortion remains illegal, and is still a taboo subject for many. But now, a ground-breaking play featuring local voices from both sides of the debate is trying to change that. By Mario Cacciottolo Malta It is estimated that hundreds of women leave Malta each year to have an abortion overseas, usually in the UK or Italy. Others illegally buy abortion pills online. Their stories inspired Maltese journalist Herman Grech to write and direct a play called De-terminated. Its script is based on the real-life experiences of abortion of seven people, both women and men, and it premieres in Valletta on Friday night. Tackling taboos "Abortion is not only a taboo here, there's almost a fear of using the 'A' word," said Grech, a prominent Maltese journalist and occasional contributor to the BBC. "When you know hundreds of women are resorting to dangerous methods to get a termination then it becomes a subject that needs to be tackled." One character has had her profession changed in the play, because her real-life counterpart says she would lose her job if the Maltese authorities discovered she had an abortion abroad. Another is based on a man who was sexually abused as a child, became promiscuous, later coerced his pregnant girlfriend into terminating their child, then found God, and now campaigns against abortion. Grech says he didn't write the play to campaign for either side. "In Malta there are only ever two sides to choose from... everything's yes or no, there are no shades of grey," he says. "Stop shouting at each other, and maybe we can actually have a debate about this." A Maltese woman's abortion experience in UK "The abortion hit on the train, after I left the clinic. I literally thought I was bleeding to death. I passed out from the pain on the train, alone." A Maltese woman in her mid-30s, Roberta became pregnant about 10 years ago when her boyfriend's condom split. She flew to a clinic in Birmingham, UK, where she paid €1,000 (£880) for pills to induce a medical abortion. "When I got off the train and to my hotel, I thought I was dying. I thought something had gone wrong," says Roberta - not her real name. "The hotel room looked like the scene of a murder. Blood on everything, projectile vomiting. Again, I'm completely on my own." When she returned to Malta, she bled for 40 days. Her "very religious" gynaecologist told her she had "committed a crime" and should be reported. Malta has a "double effect" law, allowing essential treatment of a sick mother with side effects that may harm the foetus - such as cancer therapy. But the foetus cannot be terminated just to save the mother. Deliberately terminating a pregnancy carries a prison sentence of up to three years. The morning-after pill only became legally available in Malta in December 2016 after a bitter battle that saw death threats made against those calling for the change. 'Holding society back' Lara Dimitrijevic is founder and director of the Women's Rights Foundation (WRF), which is calling for the decriminalisation of abortion in Malta. "It's a breach of the fundamental human rights based on gender discrimination, because it's targeting women and girls," she says. WRF says that in the space of five years 465 women living in Malta tried to buy abortion pills online from a single source. And a local politician has claimed that 300-400 women go abroad for this procedure each year. "This is holding Maltese society back," Ms Dimitrijevic said. "It's holding women back specifically." The Church maintains a great deal of influence in a country that teaches abstinence as its only sexual education, she complains, adding that politicians are afraid to endorse abortion. She hopes the De-terminated play will be a "softer way" to discuss the issue. Women's lives ' safeguarded by law' On the other side of the debate is Klaus Vella Bardon, deputy chairman of the LifeNetwork Foundation Malta. Malta should not even debate the issue, he argues, because that would be "a step towards making it socially acceptable". And he does not believe that the Maltese people are in favour - saying recent liberal reforms were "imposed from the top down" without necessarily being publicly popular, with the exception of divorce which was decided by referendum. "It's codswallop to say a sick pregnant woman is put at risk in Malta. Their lives are safeguarded in Maltese law," he says pointing to the "double effect" rules. "It's the woman and the family's choice. Some women have accepted no treatment or to risk having it later, because they want the child to have a shot at life." When it comes to rape, Mr Vella Bardon says that while it is a "horrible crime, why should the child be sacrificed?" "As a society we're against the death penalty, even for those who commit gratuitous murders, but why do we then accept killing a child?" He also has tickets for De-terminated, which he expects to be a "civil presentation of both points of view". Despite Grech's efforts to provoke debate through staging a play, he does not expect to see abortion introduced within his lifetime. "Women go to the UK for abortions and come back bleeding. There should be help available for them here," he said. "Despite our strict laws, abortions still happen. People should be discussing this issue. Let's try to understand each other." Additional reporting by Diana Cacciottolo.

Here is a summary requirement:
Summarize why Bardon is against abortion as mentioned in this article in one sentence

Please summarize the above article based on the given requirement:

Klaus Vella Bardon is against abortion because he believes that the lives of sick pregnant women are safeguarded by Maltese law and that the child should not be sacrificed, even in cases of rape.

Bardon is against abortion because he believes that the child should not be sacrificed, even in cases of rape, and that society should not accept killing a child.