### Question: Describe the physical and economic landscape of the jurisdiction as outlined in the plan. Include the name of the planning jurisdiction, its location, population, demographics, and average income. Include major geographic features such as mountains, rivers, deserts, and coastline, as well as any key infrastructure like airports or seaports. Highlight details about the local climate, including any mentions of aridity or water challenges. Additionally, summarize the city’s energy production (oil, gas, renewables) and natural resources, and provide information about industries and economic drivers that are crucial to the region.
**Answer:**
**Planning Jurisdiction: Charlotte, North Carolina**
***Location and Population***
- The plan does not explicitly provide detailed information regarding the current population, demographics, or average income of Charlotte.
***Geographic Features***
- The document does not mention specific geographic features such as mountains, rivers, deserts, coastline, or key infrastructure like airports or seaports within Charlotte or its surrounding region.
***Local Climate***
- There is no specific mention of the climate's aridity or water challenges in the provided excerpts.
***Energy Production***
- "North Carolina is a regulated state; therefore customers within it have a specific utility from whom they must buy their electricity and natural gas. In the case of Charlotte, more than 99% of this energy is supplied by Duke Energy Carolinas (DEC) with the small remainder supplied by Energy United." (*Understanding the Current Energy Situation*)
***Natural Resources***
- There is no specific mention of natural resources in the provided excerpts.
***Industries and Economic Drivers***
- "The SEAP focuses on three key pillars that align with the areas where Charlotte’s emissions are highest and where there is the opportunity for drastic reduction in emissions: buildings, transportation, and energy generation." (*Introduction*)
- "Economic development and job creation opportunities range from energy efficiency measures like retrofitting residences and buildings, to installation of solar PVs, to retrofitting internal combustion engine (ICE) cars with electric motors." (*Equitable Economic Development and Jobs*)
***Additional Economic Information***
- "Through the expansion of a low carbon energy sector, employment opportunities expand." (*Equitable Economic Development and Jobs*)
- "Charlotte is fortunate to have many community stakeholders that are actively engaged and knowledgeable in topics relevant to a resilient future." (*A Plan for All: Forming an Action Plan*)
### Question: To what extent does the plan address resilience, mitigation, and adaptation? After providing a brief summary of how it addresses each component, classify the plan as a whole as one of the following: mitigation dedicated, adaptation/resilience dedicated, mitigation only climate action plan, mitigation primary climate action plan, equal mitigation and adaptation climate action plan, or sustainable/green plan.
**Answer:**
### Resilience
The plan addresses resilience by outlining strategies to build a resilient Charlotte that can cope with various shocks and stresses. It emphasizes "collaboration with Mecklenburg County, the community, and other key stakeholders" to "leverage access to additional expertise, innovation, and engagement opportunities" (*A Plan for All: Forming an Action Plan*). The SEAP also aims to establish Resilient Innovation Districts (RIDs) to deliver low carbon, resilient approaches and ensure resilience while maximizing economic advantage (*Action Area 4*).
### Mitigation
The plan is heavily focused on mitigation measures, aiming for a low carbon future by reducing greenhouse gas emissions. It includes specific targets such as striving toward "100% zero carbon municipal buildings by 2030" and "100% zero carbon city fleet by 2030" (*Action Area 5* and *Action Area 6*). The SEAP is a strategy for "GHG emissions reduction" and explores the alignment of economic development policies with actions necessary to transition to a low-carbon energy future (*Introduction*).
### Adaptation
Adaptation is implied through the emphasis on building resilience, particularly in the context of engaging with community stakeholders to understand vulnerabilities and adapt accordingly. However, explicit adaptation measures are less emphasized compared to resilience and mitigation strategies.
### Classification
Based on the content provided, the plan can be classified as an **equal mitigation and adaptation climate action plan**. It presents a balanced approach by addressing both the reduction of GHG emissions and building resilience to adapt to climate impacts, even though explicit adaptation strategies are not as detailed as mitigation efforts.
### Question: Does the plan describe a scenario of climate change the planning jurisdiction will face and for which it is planning climate policies for resilience, mitigation, and adaptation? If so, please summarize any such scenario.
**Answer:**
Yes, the plan describes scenarios of climate change that the planning jurisdiction, Charlotte, will face and for which it is planning climate policies for resilience, mitigation, and adaptation. The plan specifically outlines the use of the Greenhouse Gas Regional Inventory Protocol (GRIP), a three-stage process, to form energy action plans at the local level. It includes the creation of future scenarios aimed at reducing overall emissions to achieve or exceed set targets.
**Summary of Scenario:**
- **Population Projections:** The scenarios account for population projections of 1.1 million by 2030 and 1.4 million by 2050. Each scenario session opted for different levels of economic growth, varying between an average of 1.5% and 2.5% annually over the period (page 34).
- **Emissions Reduction Targets:** All scenario sessions achieved emissions reductions by 2050, with two of the three meeting the targeted reduction for 2030. The scenarios showed broad similarities with each delivering similar levels of emissions reductions overall.
- **Sectors of Focus:** The largest emissions reductions in each session came from residential and commercial buildings, followed by transportation, largely driven by a low carbon electricity supply. Efficiency in building stock and appliances, along with transportation electrification, resulted in significant efficiency gains (page 34).
- **Energy Supply:** The scenarios included grid mixes dominated by nuclear power, aligning with Duke Energy’s Integrated Resource Plan, due to extending the life of existing plants.
- **Innovation and Efficiency:** A drive for efficiency in building stock and appliances, as well as behavioral changes, were significant factors in the scenarios (page 34).
The plan indicates a comprehensive approach to addressing climate change through systematic scenario planning, focusing on energy efficiency and transitioning to a low carbon future.
### Question: What climate hazards does the plan identify as presenting climate risks for the planning jurisdiction? For each identified climate hazard, summarize the plan’s description of: 1. The climate hazard. 2. The climate risks it poses to the planning jurisdiction. 3. Areas or populations with the most climate vulnerability to the identified climate hazard.Generate a numbered list of every hazard identified in the plan. Make the list as long as necessary to accomodate every single hazard.
**Answer:**
1. **Climatic Events (Shocks)**
- **Description:** Climatic events such as floods.
- **Risks:** These events can cause significant disruptions to the city's infrastructure and operations.
- **Vulnerable Areas/Populations:** The plan does not specify particular areas or populations, but implies that all parts of the city need to be resilient to such shocks. (Action Area 4: Develop and Implement Resilient Innovation Districts)
2. **Income Inequality and High Unemployment (Stresses)**
- **Description:** Stresses include issues such as income inequality and high unemployment.
- **Risks:** These stresses weaken the city's social and economic fabric, potentially exacerbating the impacts of climate hazards.
- **Vulnerable Areas/Populations:** Populations facing income inequality and high unemployment are most vulnerable. (Action Area 4: Develop and Implement Resilient Innovation Districts)
3. **Lack of Affordable Housing, Poor Education, and High Rates of Crime (Stresses)**
- **Description:** Other stresses include a lack of affordable housing, poor education, and high rates of crime.
- **Risks:** These stresses contribute to social instability and can hinder recovery from climatic events.
- **Vulnerable Areas/Populations:** Those living in areas with inadequate housing, education, and high crime rates are most vulnerable. (Action Area 4: Develop and Implement Resilient Innovation Districts)
### Question: What resilience options are identified in the plan? For each option, summarize: 1. The specific climate threat it addresses; 2. Details on cost, timeframe, and location, including any references found in tables, charts, or images that might contain this data; 3. Other important attributes, such as economic, environmental, or infrastructural considerations.
**Answer:**
**Resilience Options Identified in the Plan**
1. **Resilient Innovation Districts (RIDs)**
- **Climate Threat Addressed:** This option addresses the threat of *climatic events such as floods* as well as the loss of industries (Section: ACTION AREA 4).
- **Details on Cost, Timeframe, and Location:** Specific cost details are not provided. Timeframe involves ongoing engagement with stakeholders and is linked to the City’s Comprehensive Plan process in FY21 (Section: Task 1: Formalize the Concept of a Resilient Innovation District).
- **Other Attributes:** RIDs integrate Energy Innovation Zones, Resilient Innovation Neighborhoods, and the Smart Cities Concept to deliver low carbon, resilient approaches. They focus on economic benefits, job creation, and overcoming policy barriers (Section: ACTION AREA 4).
2. **Decentralized Energy Grid**
- **Climate Threat Addressed:** Addresses the threat of *dependence on finite resources like oil, gas, and coal* (Section: Resiliency).
- **Details on Cost, Timeframe, and Location:** No specific cost or timeframe provided. The focus is on localized energy generation and zero carbon energy procurement.
- **Other Attributes:** Aims to increase the use of renewable energy and develop a resilient future while minimizing environmental impacts (Section: Resiliency).
3. **Retrofitting Vehicles to Electric Drivetrain**
- **Climate Threat Addressed:** Addresses the threat of *GHG emissions from transportation* (Section: Task 4).
- **Details on Cost, Timeframe, and Location:** Pilot projects are suggested for FY21, involving retrofitting at the City maintenance facility. No specific cost details provided.
- **Other Attributes:** Offers job opportunities and aligns with the City’s circular economy strategy. It provides a closed-loop approach to waste management and additional revenue streams (Section: Task 4).
4. **Charging Network Using Gas Station Canopies**
- **Climate Threat Addressed:** Addresses the need for a *resilient energy supply for electric vehicles* (Section: Step 4).
- **Details on Cost, Timeframe, and Location:** Aimed for implementation by 2025, using existing gas station infrastructure. Cost specifics are not detailed.
- **Other Attributes:** Incorporates solar opportunities for resilience and supports the transition to electric transportation (Section: Step 4).
5. **Data Collection and Visualization for Resilience**
- **Climate Threat Addressed:** Addresses threats stemming from *lack of data-driven decision-making* (Section: Step 4).
- **Details on Cost, Timeframe, and Location:** Implementation involves establishing consistent data collection and visualization techniques. No specific costs or locations mentioned.
- **Other Attributes:** Enhances communication, education, and informed decision-making, promoting resilience (Section: Step 5).
These resilience options collectively aim to enhance Charlotte's ability to cope with climate hazards by focusing on energy decentralization, innovation, and data-driven strategies.
### Question: What mitigation options does the plan identify? For each identified mitigation option, summarize the information provided in the plan regarding cost, timing, location, and other important attributes.
**Answer:**
**Mitigation Options Identified in the Plan**
1. **Energy Service Company (ESCO) Model**
- *Description*: The ESCO model acts as a project developer for energy efficiency actions, assuming technical and performance risks, with compensation linked to actual energy cost savings.
- *Cost*: Not specified.
- *Timing*: Immediate exploration suggested.
- *Location*: Citywide deployment.
- *Attributes*: Potential to generate savings that could be funneled back into energy efficiency projects. (Chapter: Innovative Funding)
2. **Lighting Control Technologies**
- *Description*: Evaluation and implementation of lighting control technologies to adjust lighting based on scheduling and occupancy.
- *Cost*: Not specified.
- *Timing*: Short-term goal (2019-2022).
- *Location*: At least three city facilities.
- *Attributes*: Part of efforts to shift energy demand. (Appendix 4: CREDIT Timeline)
3. **Deep Energy Retrofits**
- *Description*: Implementation of deep energy retrofits based on audit findings to reduce energy consumption.
- *Cost*: Not specified.
- *Timing*: Short-term goal (2019-2022).
- *Location*: Citywide facilities.
- *Attributes*: Aims to reduce workspace needs and energy consumption through changes in work practices and facility renovations. (Appendix 4: CREDIT Timeline)
4. **Electrification of Heating Systems**
- *Description*: Investigate electrification of heating needs for city-owned facilities to remove gas sources.
- *Cost*: Not specified.
- *Timing*: Short-term goal (2019-2022).
- *Location*: City-owned facilities.
- *Attributes*: Part of efforts to change energy consumed. (Appendix 4: CREDIT Timeline)
5. **Solar Installations**
- *Description*: Investigation of solar installations on all new facilities under design.
- *Cost*: Not specified.
- *Timing*: Short-term goal (2019-2022).
- *Location*: New city facilities.
- *Attributes*: Part of efforts to generate energy on-site and achieve zero-carbon facilities. (Appendix 4: CREDIT Timeline)
6. **Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) with Duke**
- *Description*: Assess entering into PPAs to purchase solar or wind energy.
- *Cost*: Not specified.
- *Timing*: Short-term goal (2019-2022).
- *Location*: Citywide energy procurement.
- *Attributes*: Intended to purchase the remainder of energy requirements from zero-carbon sources. (Appendix 4: CREDIT Timeline)
7. **Building Efficiency Improvements**
- *Description*: Improvements to building stock through new construction and behavioral changes for energy efficiency.
- *Cost*: Not specified.
- *Timing*: Long-term goal, contributing to 2030 and 2050 targets.
- *Location*: Residential and commercial buildings.
- *Attributes*: Includes efficiency gains from electrification in transportation and improvements in appliances. (Chapter: Delivering the Plan)
8. **Shift to Zero-Carbon Energy for Municipal Buildings and Transportation**
- *Description*: Transition to sourcing 100% zero-carbon energy for municipal buildings and transportation.
- *Cost*: Dependent on technological advancements and resource availability.
- *Timing*: Medium-term goal by 2030.
- *Location*: Citywide municipal operations.
- *Attributes*: Involves structural changes and larger infrastructure projects. (Chapter: Delivering the Plan)
These mitigation options reflect a comprehensive approach to reducing greenhouse gas emissions through energy efficiency, renewable energy adoption, and infrastructure improvements.
### Question: What mitigation options does the plan identify? For each identified mitigation option, summarize the information provided in the plan regarding cost, timeframe, location, and other important attributes.
**Answer:**
The plan identifies several mitigation options as part of its strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and transition to a low carbon future. Below is a summary of the mitigation options along with information regarding cost, timeframe, location, and other important attributes as provided in the plan:
### **Mitigation Options**
1. **Lighting Control Technologies**
- **Action**: Implement lighting control technologies across City-owned facilities.
- **Timeframe**: Short-term (1-3 years) for initial evaluation at least three facilities.
- **Attributes**: Adjust lighting based on scheduling and occupancy to reduce energy consumption. (_Appendix 4: CREDIT Timeline_)
2. **Energy Treasure Hunt**
- **Action**: Conduct an energy treasure hunt per Energy Star guidelines.
- **Timeframe**: Short-term (1-3 years).
- **Attributes**: Engage employees to identify energy-saving improvements. (_Appendix 4: CREDIT Timeline_)
3. **Deep Energy Retrofits**
- **Action**: Implement deep energy retrofits based on audit findings.
- **Timeframe**: Both short-term (1-3 years) and mid-term (4-7 years).
- **Attributes**: Focus on changing work practices and renovating facilities to increase efficiency. (_Appendix 4: CREDIT Timeline_)
4. **Electrification of Heating Systems**
- **Action**: Investigate electrification of heating needs for City-owned facilities.
- **Timeframe**: Short-term (1-3 years).
- **Attributes**: Aim to remove gas sources from heating systems. (_Appendix 4: CREDIT Timeline_)
5. **Solar Installation and PV Assessment**
- **Action**: Investigate solar installation on new facilities and continue closing gaps for onsite PV at sites with available space.
- **Timeframe**: Short-term (1-3 years) for new facilities; mid-term (4-7 years) for existing facilities.
- **Attributes**: Evaluate opportunities for solar energy generation to reduce reliance on non-renewable energy. (_Appendix 4: CREDIT Timeline_)
6. **Zero-Carbon Facility**
- **Action**: Achieve one zero-carbon facility, with Fire Station 43 being designed to zero-carbon standards.
- **Timeframe**: Short-term (1-3 years).
- **Attributes**: Design to be replicated for additional stations. (_Appendix 4: CREDIT Timeline_)
7. **ESCO Model**
- **Action**: Explore the Energy Service Company (ESCO) model to achieve municipal goals.
- **Attributes**: ESCOs act as project developers for energy efficiency actions, assuming technical and performance risks. Compensation is linked to actual energy cost savings. (_Innovative Funding_)
8. **Teleconferencing/Videoconferencing**
- **Action**: Shift from travel between facilities for meetings to teleconferencing/videoconferencing.
- **Attributes**: Reduce transportation emissions. (_Shift Energy Demand_)
9. **EV Charging Stations**
- **Action**: Expand EV charging stations at 10 city facilities.
- **Attributes**: Use solar energy where practical to support the adoption of electric vehicles. (_Change Energy Consumed_)
10. **Alternate Fuel Vehicles**
- **Action**: Increase the number of alternate fuel vehicles (CNG, biogas, biodiesel).
- **Attributes**: Reduce reliance on fossil fuels for the city fleet. (_Change Energy Consumed_)
The plan does not provide specific cost details for each mitigation option, but it emphasizes the need for innovative funding solutions, such as government and international grants, private-sector investment, and leveraging local relationships. The timeframe for implementation ranges from short-term to medium-term for different projects, with a focus on achieving the 2030 GHG reduction target and transitioning to zero-carbon energy. The plan covers various locations with an emphasis on City-owned facilities and infrastructure.
### Question: What adaptation options does the plan identify? For each identified adaptation option, summarize: 1. The climate threat it is addressing. 2. Information provided in the plan regarding cost, timeframe, location, and other important attributes.
**Answer:**
Based on the provided excerpts from the plan, the adaptation options identified are as follows:
### **Resilient Innovation Districts (RIDs)**
1. **Climate Threat Addressed:**
- The RIDs are designed to address multiple climate threats, such as shocks from climatic events (e.g., floods) and stresses that weaken a city, including income inequality, high unemployment, lack of affordable housing, poor education, and high crime rates. Ensuring resilience at various scales (city, neighborhood, district) requires understanding vulnerabilities across communities, government agencies, city departments, businesses, and utilities.
- *"A resilient city is one that can deal with shocks and stresses. Shocks may include climatic events such as floods, or it could be the disappearance of an industry upon which the city is highly dependent."* (Action Area 4)
2. **Cost, Timeframe, Location, and Other Attributes:**
- The RIDs are a combination of Energy Innovation Zones (EIZs), Resilient Innovation Neighborhoods, and the Smart Cities Concept, aiming to establish business models for low carbon, resilient approaches that can be deployed elsewhere.
- *"The proposed Resilient Innovation Districts are a combination of Energy Innovation Zones (EIZs), Resilient Innovation Neighborhoods, and the Smart Cities Concept. They are there to deliver low carbon, resilient approaches in order to establish the business models that can see their deployment elsewhere."* (Action Area 4)
### **General Adaptation Strategy**
1. **Climate Threat Addressed:**
- The SEAP addresses the need for adaptation to the overall impacts of climate change, such as energy poverty, resilience needs, and equitable economic development.
- *"Charlotte’s development of the SEAP shows the City’s leadership in their desire to address the fact that the impacts of climate change significantly affect all communities, and the need for solutions that are effective, fair, and equitable."* (Addressing Climate Change and Associated Challenges)
2. **Cost, Timeframe, Location, and Other Attributes:**
- The SEAP is a long-term action plan with a 32-year implementation timeline aimed at achieving a low carbon, resilient future by 2050.
- *"The SEAP is a long-term action plan with a 32-year implementation timeline with Action Areas, tasks, recommendations, targets, and projects that span this period."* (Next Steps)
### **General Resilience Building**
1. **Climate Threat Addressed:**
- The plan aims to build resilience against chronic stresses and acute shocks experienced by individuals, communities, institutions, businesses, and systems within the city.
- *"Resiliency is defined as 'the capacity of individuals, communities, institutions, businesses, and systems within a city to survive, adapt, and grow, no matter what kinds of chronic stresses and acute shocks they experience.'"* (SEAP Overview)
2. **Cost, Timeframe, Location, and Other Attributes:**
- Specific costs and timeframes are not detailed in the excerpts, but the plan involves citywide strategies and requires collaboration with various stakeholders.
- *"The SEAP is an ambitious, aggressive action plan for delivering a low carbon, resilient Charlotte. It is intended to improve the quality of life for all citizens of Charlotte."* (A Plan for All: Forming an Action Plan)
The plan identifies these adaptation options as part of broader strategies to increase resilience and reduce the impacts of climate change, with implementation spanning several years and involving multiple stakeholders.
### Question: What climate policies does the plan identify to advance climate justice? For each climate policy, summarize: 1. The climate threat it is addressing. 2. Areas or populations with the most climate vulnerability to the identified climate hazard.
**Answer:**
The plan does not explicitly mention specific climate policies solely targeting climate justice. However, it does emphasize equitable solutions and the involvement of community stakeholders, which are integral to advancing climate justice. Here are relevant aspects of the plan that indirectly address climate justice:
1. **General Approach to Climate Justice:**
- **Climate Threat Addressed:** The plan addresses various climate threats such as energy poverty, the need for resilience, and equitable economic development.
- **Vulnerable Populations:** Low-income families experiencing energy poverty are highlighted as vulnerable. The plan mentions, "Energy poverty is still an issue for many low-income families in Charlotte" (*Addressing Climate Change and Associated Challenges*).
2. **Public Engagement and Empowerment:**
- **Climate Threat Addressed:** Lack of awareness and community involvement in climate action can exacerbate vulnerability.
- **Vulnerable Populations:** All citizens of Charlotte, particularly those who may lack access to information or resources, are targeted for empowerment through informed decision-making regarding energy generation and consumption. The plan states, "A key goal of the SEAP is to enable and empower Charlotteans to make informed decisions regarding energy generation and consumption" (*A Plan for All: Forming an Action Plan*).
3. **Vision for Sustainability and Resilience:**
- **Climate Threat Addressed:** General environmental degradation and lack of resilience can impact vulnerable communities disproportionately.
- **Vulnerable Populations:** The vision emphasizes equity and resilience across the community. The plan articulates the vision as ensuring "equity and resilience - for today’s and future generations" (*Vision*).
These elements indicate a commitment to equitable climate solutions, although specific policies targeting climate justice are not explicitly detailed in the document.
### Question: Identify any potential unforeseen maladaptive climate policies. For each identified climate policy, summarize: 1. The climate threat it is addressing. 2. The resilience, mitigation, or adaptation option that the climate policy proposes. 3. Why it may cause inadvertent maladaption.
**Answer:**
Based on the provided document, there are no explicit mentions of policies that are identified as potentially causing maladaptation. However, a close analysis of the proposed strategies can highlight areas where unforeseen maladaptive outcomes might occur. Here are some potential areas to consider:
1. **Resilient Innovation Districts (RIDs)**
- **Climate Threat Addressed:** The RIDs aim to address GHG emissions and enhance resilience against climate impacts such as floods.
- **Resilience, Mitigation, or Adaptation Option:** The policy proposes establishing Resilient Innovation Districts to integrate low carbon and resilient business models, which aim to reduce emissions and create economic opportunities. As stated, "The suggested approach is to establish a set of Resilient Innovation Districts...to ‘rid’ itself of CO2e emissions while ensuring resilience and maximizing job opportunities" (Action Area 4).
- **Potential Maladaptation:** While the RIDs are designed to create resilience and reduce emissions, if not carefully managed, they could inadvertently lead to increased inequality or gentrification. By focusing on innovation districts, there is a risk that benefits may not be equitably distributed across all communities, potentially exacerbating social vulnerabilities.
2. **Tree Canopy Management**
- **Climate Threat Addressed:** The policy is aimed at maintaining and enhancing the urban tree canopy to mitigate urban heat and act as a carbon sink.
- **Resilience, Mitigation, or Adaptation Option:** The tree canopy provides cooling effects and reduces CO2 emissions. "Charlotte’s trees provide a cooling effect to the City, helping to drop temperatures caused by the Urban Heat Island Effect. The canopy also acts as a carbon sink" (Charlotte’s Urban Forest).
- **Potential Maladaptation:** If the focus is solely on preserving the existing tree canopy without considering future climate conditions or diverse species planting, there might be a risk of maladaptation. A monoculture approach or failure to account for pests and diseases could lead to a vulnerability in the urban forest, making it less resilient to future climate changes.
3. **Energy Procurement Policies**
- **Climate Threat Addressed:** The policy seeks to address energy consumption and GHG emissions through sustainable procurement practices.
- **Resilience, Mitigation, or Adaptation Option:** Strengthening procurement policies to focus on energy-efficient appliances and lighting, and integrating renewable energy sources. "Change procurement requirements of lighting and appliances" (Internal Action Areas).
- **Potential Maladaptation:** If these procurement policies do not consider the life cycle impacts or the social and economic context of the technologies, they could lead to increased costs and reduced accessibility for certain populations, inadvertently increasing energy poverty.
These areas highlight the importance of inclusive and comprehensive planning to avoid potential maladaptive outcomes.
### Question: In what ways does the plan measure the success or failure of each adaptation, resilience, and mitigation option? List any specific metrics used, such as reductions in CO2 emissions, improvements in air quality, or other quantifiable impacts. Identify the exact units (e.g., tons, percentages, index values) mentioned in the plan for tracking these outcomes. Additionally, outline any concrete goals or targets set for each option, including deadlines or specific numerical objectives.
**Answer:**
**Metrics and Measurement of Success:**
1. **Reductions in CO2 Emissions:**
- The plan includes "annual submissions relating to climate change," which involves "an assessment of energy and emissions within the City" based on the Global Protocol for Cities (GPC) methodology (Action Areas).
- The goal is to achieve emissions reduction targets for both 2030 and 2050. The plan states, "The City’s vision and proposed path toward a low carbon future" and the requirement to report GHG emissions via CDP using GPC methodology (Community Action Areas).
- Concrete goals include sourcing "100% of energy use in municipal facilities and fleet from zero carbon sources by 2030" (Appendix 4: CREDIT Timeline).
2. **Improvements in Air Quality:**
- While specific metrics for air quality improvements are not detailed, the plan's overarching goal of reducing GHG emissions would imply indirect improvements in air quality.
3. **Energy Efficiency and Building Improvements:**
- For building improvements, the plan outlines goals such as achieving "one zero-carbon facility within the short-term range" and investigating "solar installation on all new facilities under design" (Future Building Project Short Term Goals).
- The plan mentions "implement deep energy retrofits based on audit findings" and "evaluate lighting control technology at least three facilities" (Short Term Goals and Objectives).
4. **Data Collection and Reporting:**
- The plan emphasizes the need for "consistent data collection as a step towards resilience" and recommends creating "a dashboard to have all City data in one easily accessible location" (Action Areas).
- The plan states that "monitoring and reporting structure" is crucial, with the SEAP being reviewed after the first two years and then at five-year intervals (Monitoring and Reporting Structure).
5. **Specific Numerical Objectives:**
- The plan aims to meet the "targets for the Paris Climate Accord" to stay below a "temperature increase of 2°C globally" (A Science-Based Target).
- The plan sets a "per capita target," which was discussed and endorsed during stakeholder meetings (Task 2: Develop a Suite of Educational Tools).
6. **Timeline and Review:**
- The SEAP includes a timeline for updating and reviewing progress, stating, "The SEAP will need to be updated and reviewed after the first two years, and then at five-year intervals in the period beyond" (Task 5: Timeline and Measuring Progress).
**Concrete Goals and Targets:**
- **2030 Goals:**
- Achieve emissions reduction targets and source 100% zero carbon energy for municipal buildings and transportation (Delivering the Plan).
- **2050 Goals:**
- The long-term goal is to achieve a "zero carbon energy future" (Delivering the Plan).
The plan consistently emphasizes the importance of data-driven decision-making, transparency, and stakeholder engagement to track and measure progress towards these goals.
### Question: Generate a table that summarizes the following features from the document: Location/City Name, Population, Threats Identified, Measures Identified
**Answer:**
```markdown
| **Feature** | **Details** |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **Location/City Name** | Charlotte, North Carolina |
| **Population** | - Current: Approx. 860,000
- Projected 2030: 1.1 million
- Projected 2050: 1.4 million |
| **Threats Identified** | - Rapid population growth leading to increased demand for housing and infrastructure
- Loss of tree canopy due to mature trees and development
- Climate change impacts |
| **Measures Identified** | - Strategic Energy Action Plan (SEAP) to deliver a low carbon and resilient future by 2050
- Urban forest management to maintain tree canopy
- Development of smart data approaches |
```